Case ID: ohio-st_121/html/0615-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

McCarthy et al. v. Duncan et al.
    (No. 21872
    Decided October 9, 1929.)
    
      Mr. J. M. Howard and Mr. Charles A. Eberly, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Messrs. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Mr. Henry J. Linton and Mr. C. A. Eberly, for defendants in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.

Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., not participating.