Case ID: sw3d_100/html/0834-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WHOLE TRUTH TABERNACLE UNITED PENTECOSTAL CHURCH, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. CHURCH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 80603.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Feb. 11, 2003.
    Motions for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 20, 2003.
    Application for Transfer Denied April 22, 2003.
    Robert W. Cockerham, T. Michael Ward, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Arthur G. Muegler, Jr., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS and BOOKER T. SHAW, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Church Mutual Insurance Company (“insurer”) appeals the judgment of the trial court denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and alternative motion for new trial. Insurer claims that Whole Truth Tabernacle United Pentecostal Church (“church”) faded to make a submissible case under a partial loss theory. Church cross appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing counts of civil conspiracy and fraud against insurer and Bi-State Claims Service, Inc. (“Bi-State”) for failure to state a cause of action.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).