Case ID: mcgrath_1/html/0788-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

McCARTHY ET AL. vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Monroe),
    36 M., 274.
   To vacate an order denying a motion for a re-sale of certain real estate, which had been sold under a levy, but the sale of which had been set aside.

Denied April 17, 1877.

An application for mandamus to vacate an order made must be heard on the facts disclosed at the hearing in the circuit, and not upon new facts brought into the case upon the application here; and where the record does not disclose what the showing was at the hearing in the circuit, the court cannot say that relators were entitled to any different order than that which was made, and will not grant mandamus to compel the circuit judge to reverse his action.