Case ID: mass-l-rptr_2/html/0568-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "McHugh, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Elayne Nascimento et al v. Harvard Community Health Plan et al
    Superior Court, Middlesex, SS
    No. 94-2534
    Memorandum Dated August 17, 1994
   McHugh, J.

Motion #7 of Defendants to Stay Discovery, is DENIED. There is no clean-cut answer to the question of the impact on discovery of administrative inability to meet the 15-day deadline. Under the circumstances of this case, I believe that it would be unj ust to wait any longer. In so saying, I recognize that a negative tribunal finding coupled with an electing by plaintiffs to abandon the action may leave defendants without a source for recovery of the costs. The tribunal statute was designed to cover, nevertheless, in this case. Where time is of the essence, the balance of comparative harm suggests that discovery proceed.