Case ID: ad2d_228/html/0246-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(June 13, 1996)
    Summit Rovins & Feldesman, Respondent, v Fonar Corporation, Appellant.
    [643 NYS2d 343]
   The IAS Court properly rejected defendant’s document demands since information concerning plaintiff’s billings to other clients is not material and necessary to the defense of the action (CPLR 3101 [a]).

Upon reargument, the unpublished decision and order of this Court entered on April 23, 1996 (Appeal No. 57633) recalled and vacated and a new decision and order substituted therefor, decided simultaneously herewith. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ellerin, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.