Case ID: sw3d_360/html/0801-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gary HALL, et al., Appellants, v. Larry JACKSON, et al., Respondents.
    No. ED 96631.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Dec. 6, 2011.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 23, 2012.
    Application for Transfer Denied April 3, 2012.
    Kenneth J. Heinz, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    John A. Michener, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
    Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J. and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gary Hall, Janet Fortus, and Robert Gates appeal the grant of summary judgment in favor of Larry Jackson, Kathy Schweitzer, Edward D. Campbell, Sam Craig, Karla Reichelt, Michael Davis, and Dan Bellows (collectively referred to as “Defendants”) on their petition for unlawful expenditure of funds, breach of fiduciary duty, declaratory judgment, injunction, negligence, an accounting, and removal of the trustees and officers. We find that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).