Case ID: so2d_201/html/0088-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Raymond HENNIG, Appellant, v. Robert HENNIG, as Administrator of the Estate of Mary J. Hennig, Deceased, Appellee.
    No. 66-748.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    May 10, 1967.
    On Rehearing July 5, 1967.
    Rehearing Denied Aug. 16, 1967.
    Selkowitz, Corrigan, Fromberg & From-berg, Miami, for appellant.
    J. M. Flowers, Miami, for appellee.
    Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and SWANN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The court, sua sponte, dismisses this appeal, inasmuch as it is an appeal from an order which is not final.

It is so ordered.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY, and SWANN, JJ.

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

This cause was originally dismissed, sua sponte, by the court as an appeal from an order which was not final. Appellant was granted a rehearing on the order of dismissal, at which the appellee conceded that the decree was a final adjudication upon the merits. See old Rule 1.35(b), 1954 Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 30 F.S.A., as amended. We thereupon reinstate this appeal and proceed to consider the issues raised herein. We find this to be of no avail because we have not been provided with a complete and sufficient record upon which to review the issues involved. We must, therefore, affirm.

Affirmed. 
      
      . Morceau v. Meader, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 242; Wilder v. Altman, Fla.App. 1965, 179 So.2d 250; Williams v. Williams, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 488.