Case ID: f-appx_10/html/0228-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Herbert FOY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. D.A. BRAXTON, Warden of the Buckingham Correctional Center, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 00-7574.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted May 22, 2001.
    Decided June 5, 2001.
    
      Herbert Foy, pro se. Steven Andrew Witmer, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.
    Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Herbert Foy appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Foy v. Braxton, No. CA-99-1863-AM (E.D.Va. Sept. 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.