Case ID: f2d_907/html/0141-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FIGURE FLATTERY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 90-1079.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    July 11, 1990.
    Ned H. Marshak, Sharretts, Paley, Carter & Blauvelt, P.C., of New York City, argued, for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Gail T. Cumins.
    Saul Davis, Trial Atty., Intern. Trade Field Office, Dept, of Justice, of New York City, argued, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge.
    Before NIES, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, and BROWNING, District Judge.
    
      
       The Honorable William D. Browning, United States District Court for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 293(a).
    
   PER CURIAM.

The decision of the United States Court of International Trade, Figure Flattery, Inc. v. United States, 720 F.Supp. 1008 (Ct.Int’l Trade 1989), is affirmed. We adopt that court’s opinion.

AFFIRMED.