Case ID: md_236/html/0659-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CRAWFORD v. DIRECTOR OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION
    [App. No. 77,
    
    September Term, 1964.]
    
      Decided December 7, 1964.
    
    Before Henderson, C. J., and Hammond', Peescott, Hoeney, Maebuey, Sybeet and OppenheimBe, JJ.
   Per Curiam.

In this application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency, the applicant raises no contentions that have not been passed on repeatedly by this Court. We find the evidence to be admissible and sufficient. Cf. Silvestri v. Director, 234 Md. 641. In so finding, we do not rely upon the report of his psychiatrist, not offered in evidence below but appearing in the record.

Application denied.