Case ID: ad_246/html/0775-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jack Pulichene, Respondent, v. Frank Nightingale, Rose Marie Stoddard, Defendants, and Paul Pulichene, Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Jack Pulichene, Respondent, v. Frank Nightingale, Rose Marie Stoddard, Defendants, and Paul Pulichene, Appellant. (Action No. 2.) Mary Pulichene, Respondent, v. Frank Nightingale, Rose Marie Stoddard, Defendants, and Paul Pulichene, Appellant. (Action No. 3.)
   Three actions for damages arising out of an automobile collision. By stipulation they were consolidated and tried together. Appeal by defendant Paul Pulichene from the judgment and also from the order denying his motion for a new trial. Judgment and order of the County Court of Dutchess county unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present— Young, Hagarty, Davis and Johnston, JJ.; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.