Case ID: so2d_593/html/0568-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. ANSTEAD, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ruby Gayle RODDY, Appellant, v. Charles T. RODDY, Appellee.
    No. 91-1400.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Jan. 29, 1992.
    Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied March 16, 1992.
    Charles W. Musgrove, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Joyce A. Conway, Jones, Foster, Johnston & Stubbs, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, J., and FRANK, RICHARD H., Associate Judge, concur.

ANSTEAD, J., dissents with opinion.

ANSTEAD, Judge,

dissenting.

I believe that the appellant is at least entitled to a hearing on the issue of attorney’s fees and costs. It is undisputed that there is a tremendous financial disparity between the parties in favor of the appel-lee. What is lacking is a record demonstrating the nature and amount of fees and costs claimed and a legal and evidentiary basis for denying the claim. On the present record we are left to speculate as to the possible basis for the trial court’s denial.