Case ID: misc2d_118/html/0497-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Raymond Steadman et al., Respondents, v Lawrence Anderson, Appellant.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    February 10, 1983
    APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      JudithB. Studebaker and Radhika Nagubandi for appellant. Mark A. Gross for respondents.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment affirmed, without costs.

It is uncontradicted that the City of Mount Vernon operated the premises in question from November, 1980 until October, 1981. During that period the premises were not a housing accommodation subject to rent control (Emergency Housing Rent Control Law, § 2, subd 2, par [e], L 1946, ch 274, § 2, as added L 1961, ch 337, as amd L 1966, ch 509). It follows that, since the premises were not rent controlled at the time the city abolished rent control on July 1, 1981, tenant was not entitled to the extension provided for in subdivision 2-a of section 12 of the Emergency Housing Rent Control Law (L 1971, ch 374, § 3).

Slifkin, J. P., Geiler and Di Paola, JJ., concur.