Case ID: so2d_407/html/1089-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sanford S. BACON, Appellant, v. Leslie J. AUGUST, CPA; Lawrence H. Blum, CPA; Martin Chernoff, CPA; Stanley L. Cohen, CPA; Richard Drath, CPA; and Gary Gross, CPA, et al., Appellees.
    No. 81-347.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Jan. 5, 1982.
    Landefeld & Romanik, Hollywood, for appellant.
    Paige & Catlin and Steven H. Hibbe, Miami, for appellees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, BASKIN and JOR-GENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Although the plaintiffs’ attempt to pierce a corporate veil was rejected by an unap-pealed order of involuntary dismissal at the conclusion of their case at the trial, we are unable to find an abuse of discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for attorneys’ fees under Section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1979). Guthartz v. Lewis, 408 So.2d 600 (Fla.3d DCA 1981); Executive Centers of America, Inc. v. Durability Seating & Interiors, Inc., 402 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); City of Deerfield Beach v. Oliver-Hoffman Corp. of Deerfield Beach, 396 So.2d 1187 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Freeman v. Valdez, 393 So.2d 1173 (Fla.3d DCA 1981); Allen v. Estate of Dutton, 384 So.2d 171 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), review denied, 392 So.2d 1373 (Fla.1980); see Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

Affirmed.