Case ID: ad2d_139/html/0565-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Patrick Henry, as District Attorney of Suffolk County, Appellant, v Bruce Meinken, Respondent.
   — In an action to recover a civil forfeiture pursuant to CPLR article 13A, the plaintiff District Attorney of Suffolk County appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lama, J.), entered December 11, 1986, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3213 for summary judgment in lieu of complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the appellant’s time to serve a complaint is extended until 20 days after service upon him of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry.

The stipulation signed by the defendant, while arguably providing "for the payment of money only”, is not the type of "commercial paper” envisioned by CPLR 3213 (Interman Indus. Prods. v R. S. M. Electron Power, 37 NY2d 151, 154-155; Wagner v Cornblum, 36 AD2d 427, 428-429; Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3213:3, at 829-830). Further, CPLR 1311 (5) provides that "[a]n action for forfeiture shall be commenced by service * * * of a summons with notice or summons and verified complaint”. Accordingly, the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, properly denied the plaintiff’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3213 for summary judgment in lieu of a complaint. The Supreme Court, Suffolk County, properly converted the plaintiff’s motion to a plenary action and directed the plaintiff to serve a complaint (CPLR 3213). After joinder of issue or upon the default of the defendant, the plaintiff may, if he be so advised, take any appropriate steps for an accelerated judgment. Mengano, J. P., Bracken, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.