Case ID: fed-cl_128/html/0392-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SUSAN G. BRADEN, Judge", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FAVOR TECHCONSULTING, LLC, Plaintiff, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant.
    No. 16-1365 C
    United States Court of Federal Claims.
    Filed: October 24, 2016
    Temporary Restraining Order RCFC 66(d)
   EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

SUSAN G. BRADEN, Judge

On October 19, 2016, the court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”), temporarily restraining performance of the three Blanket Purchase Agreements (“BPAs”) currently under protest at the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) until October 26, 2016. In the October 19, 2016 Memorandum Opinion, the court instructed the Government to provide documentation demonstrating that the award of the contracts was on September 26, 2016, as opposed to September 27, 2016.

On October 24, 2016, the court convened a telephone Status Conference to discuss the status of the Government’s filing. During the Status Conference, counsel for the Government stated that the Government would make its filing on October 24, 2016. This filing constitutes a Response to Plaintiffs October 19, 2016 Motion For A Temporary Restraining Order. Under the Rules of The United States Court of Federal Claims, a Reply to Response must be filed within 7 days after service of the Response. See RCFC 7.2(a)(2). Therefore, Plaintiffs Reply will be due October 31, 2016.

Pursuant to the October 24, 2016 telephone Status Conference, the October 19, 2016 TRO is extended for the time provided for Plaintiff to Reply to the Government’s Response, plus 3 days. The October 19, 2016 TRO is therefore extended for 10 days until November 3, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.