Case ID: njl_112/html/0496-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

AMERICAN BLOWER CORPORATION, RESPONDENT, v. SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY, APPELLANT. AMERICAN RADIATOR COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Submitted February 16, 1934
    Decided April 12, 1934.
    For the appellants, Frederick F. Richardson.
    
    For the respondents, Smith & Slingerland.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The determinative question involved in these two suits is identical with that of Johnson Service Co. v. Seaboard Surety Co., 112 N. J. L. 493. The essential facts are also identical in character, and are sufficiently set out, mutatis mutandis, in the decision of Judge Porter in the Johnson case. For the reasons there given, the two judgments now under review will be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trbnchard, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskiric, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.