Case ID: conn-app_14/html/0808-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James R. Carr et al. v. Om P. Mehta
    (6447)
    Dupont, C. J., Daly and O’Connell, Js.
    Argued April 13 —
    decision released April 21, 1988
    
      
      Robert K. Lesser, for the appellant (defendant).
    
      Dennis N. Garvey, with whom was Barbara Cox, for the appellees (plaintiffs).
   Per Curiam.

This appeal is an attempt by the defendant to have this court retry the facts found by the trial court. We will not. The defendant also claims that the trial court’s orders are impermissibly vague. We do not agree. Furthermore, any claimed ambiguity could have been clarified for the defendant by the seeking of articulation from the trial court.

There is no error.