Case ID: so2d_768/html/1097-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hector PEFAUR, Appellant, v. Pilar PEFAUR, Appellee.
    Nos. 95-2624, 95-2720.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 13, 1995.
    Brian R. Hersh, Miami, for appellant.
    Kutner and West and Carolyn W. West, Miami, for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, LEVY and GREEN, JJ.
   ON MOTION TO REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it required appellant to post a $400,000 bond to stay the orders under review on this appeal. In so doing, however, we hasten to add that we have not assessed the merits of this appeal at this time.

Affirmed.