Case ID: ad_284/html/0804-09.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(July 22, 1954.)
    (Republished.)
    Anthony Komar, Respondent, v. Dun & Bradstreet Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. Dun & Bradstreet Co., Inc., et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. A. Greene Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
   ‘Judgment modified by reversing that part thereof which grants judgment in favor of plaintiff against defendants, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs and, as so modified, affirmed. Present — Dore, J. P., Callahan, Breitel, Bastow and Botein, JJ. Opinion by Callahan, J. Breitel and Bastow, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and order a new trial unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce the verdict to $60,000 in which event the judgment, as so modified, is affirmed; dissenting opinion by Bastow, J. Order filed.

[Also printed ante, p. 538.— Rep.]