Case ID: ny_92/html/0657-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Danforth, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Thomas McDonnell, Appellant.
    Where, to an indictment for murder, the defendant pleaded “guilty to manslaughter in the first degree,” held, that an acceptance of the plea and a judgment thereon was proper ; that it was not necessary to aver in the indictment the facts which, if proven, would constitute the lesser crime.
    (Submitted May 2, 1883;
    decided May 11, 1883.)
    The defendant was indicted for murder in the first degree. He pleaded “ guilty to manslaughter in the first degree,” and after sentence by the General Sessions and judgment thereon, appealed to the Supreme Court, where the judgment was affirmed. The court here say:
    “In this conclusion we find no error. The indictment charges the commission of the offense under circumstances constituting its highest degree. Upon trial he might have been convicted of a lower degree (2 B. S. 702, § 27; Keefe v. People, 40 N. Y. 348), and in that case could not again be tried or convicted of a different degree thereof. (2 B. S. 702, § 28.) The same result follows a plea of guilty. It was not necessary to aver in the indictment the facts or circumstances which, if proven, would constitute the lesser crime. These are matters of evidence for the benefit of the accused. People v. Butler (3 Park. Or. 377), cited by the appellant, is not to the contrary, but recognizes the rule that an indictment under the common-law form is sufficient notwithstanding the statute, and permits a conviction for the offense charged in any degree according to the evidence. Nor do the cases referred to by his counsel support Ms contention.”
    
      
      William F. Kintzing for appellant.
    
      John Vincent for respondent.
   Danforth, J.,

reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.