Case ID: ga-app_30/html/0105-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Luke, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

14169.
    Puritan Oil & Paint Co. v. Yates.
    Decided April 10, 1923.
    Complaint; from city court of Swainsboro — Judge Kirkland. November 20, 1922.
    
      Arthur W. Jordan, Grey &' Williams, for plaintiff.
    
      Price & Spivey, for defendant.
   Luke, J.

There was some evidence to authorize the verdict, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. The exceptions to the charge of the court are without merit. The charge of the court was full and fair and submitted correctly the issues of the case as made by the pleadings and evidence. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodic-orth, J., concur.