Case ID: nys_67/html/1146-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SHEPPARD et al., Respondents, v. BERNEY, Appellant.
    (City Court of New York, General Term.
    December 13, 1900.)
    Action by Franklin L. and Howard R. Sheppard against Rose Berney. From a judgment for plaintiffs, and an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Abram S. Jaffer, for appellant.
    Roger Foster, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

In support of the appeal it is urged that there is no proof in the testimony of the value of the property alleged to have been converted at the time of the demand, and that the verdict of the jury is excessive and against the weight of evidence. We have carefully examined the record, and find ample proof Of value, and in other respects the verdict is supported by the evidence. Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs.