Case ID: sw2d_770/html/0749-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re the Marriage of Dorothy Jean BARTZ, Appellant, v. Thomas Joseph BARTZ, Respondent.
    No. 54667.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    May 30, 1989.
    Theodore S. Schechter, Cynthia Ann So-bel, Marie-Anne Woodruff, Clayton, for appellant.
    Justin C. Cordonnier, St. Louis, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment in a dissolution case. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight, of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).