Case ID: f-appx_57/html/0764-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector Paz BONILLAS-ROSAS, aka Hector Pass Bonillas-Rosas, aka Hector Bonita-Rosas, aka Gustavo Barle-ta Rojas, aka Hector Rojas, aka Hector Pas Rojas, aka Hector Bonillas-Rosas Pas, aka Hector Pas Bonillas-Rosas, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 01-10292.
    D.C. No. CR-00-01230-FRZ.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 10, 2003.
    
    Decided March 14, 2003.
    Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Bonillas-Ro-sas' request for oral argument is denied.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Hector Paz Bonillas-Rosas appeals his jury-trial conviction and 84-month sentence imposed for illegally reentering the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Bonillas-Rosas’ attorney has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Bonil-las-Rosas has filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our review of the Anders and pro se briefs and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.