Case ID: tex-crim_165/html/0300-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. BELCHER, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Tommie Nathaniel Greer v. State
    No. 29,169.
    June 26, 1957.
    Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing Overruled October 16, 1957.
    Appellant’s Second Motion for Rehearing Overruled (Without Written Opinion) November 13, 1957.
    
      Appellant represented himself.
    
      Dan Walton, District Attorney, Thomas D. White, Assistant District Attorney, Houston, and Leon Douglas, State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.
   PER CURIAM.

The offense is burglary, with prior convictions of felonies less than capital alleged for enhancement; the punishment, life.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

BELCHER, Judge.

A purported statement of facts was received by the clerk of this court on October 9,1957, which was more than two hundred days after notice of appeal was given. The court reporter’s certificate thereto bears the date of October 4, 1957. It fails to show that it had been approved by the trial judge or the appellant and the attorney representing the state. Also, it fails to show that it had been filed with the clerk of the trial court.

Under the record, this court is not authorized to consider such a purported statement of facts.

Art. 759a, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P.; Jaynes v. State, 164 Texas Cr. Rep. 147, 296 S.W. (2d) 934; Keener v. State, 164 Texas Cr. Rep. 439, 300 S.W. (2d) 85; Hankins v. State, 163 Texas Cr. Rep. 553, 294 S.W. (2d) 850; Anaya v. State, 292 S.W. (2d) 108.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.

Opinion approved by the court.