Case ID: so2d_656/html/0287-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

L.J. CHERRY, Appellant, v. Frank B. ARNALL, Conservation Plans, Inc., and A.B. Blackburn, Jr., Appellees.
    No. 94-1858.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 27, 1995.
    James W. Prevatt, Jr. of Airth, Sellers, Lewis & Prevatt, Live Oak, for appellant.
    P. Campbell Ford of Osborne, McNatt, Shaw, O’Hara, Brown & Obringer, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

We find that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment as factual issues exist as to 1) whether the accord and satisfaction which was executed was intended to preclude appellant from seeking relief against appel-lee, and 2) whether appellant could have justifiably relied on alleged misrepresentations made by appellee.

We, therefore, reverse the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.

WOLF, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.