Case ID: ohio-st-3d_75/html/0397-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kay.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Kay (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 397.]
    (No. 95-2129
    Submitted January 24, 1996
    Decided April 10, 1996.)
    
      
      Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Lori J. Brown, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
    
      Abraham Fred Kay, pro se.
    
   Per Curiam.

This court agrees with the findings and recommendations of the board. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Young, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

William W. Young, J., of the Twelfth Appellate District, sitting for Wright, J.