Case ID: so2d_608/html/0581-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. COPE, Judge", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Stephen MAUGERI, Appellee.
    No. 91-2952.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 24, 1992.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Consuelo Maingot, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
    Saul & Kotler, and Scott B. Saul, Miami, for appellee.
    Before NESBITT, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NESBITT and GERSTEN, JJ., concur.

COPE, Judge

(dissenting).

I do not think the disposition in this case is consistent with Allen v. State, 526 So.2d 69, 69-70 & footnote (Fla.1988), and subsection 958.04(2), Florida Statutes (1991) (“In lieu of other criminal penalties authorized by law and notwithstanding any imposition of consecutive sentences, the court shall dispose of the criminal case as fol-lows_”) (emphasis added). I would reverse and remand for resentencing,