Case ID: njl_87/html/0328-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MAX RUBINOW, APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC SERVICE RAILWAY COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
    Submitted July 6, 1914—
    Decided March 23, 1915.
    On appeal from the Hudson County Circuit Court.
    For the appellant, Roe, Runyon & Autenreith.
    
    For the respondent, Edwards & Smith.
    
   Per Curiam.

The court being equally divided, in opinion, the judgment under review must be affirmed.

For affirmmce—The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Swayze, Bergen, Yredenburgh, Terhune, Heppenheimer, Williams, JJ. 8.

For reversal—Garrison, Trenoi-iard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Bogert, White, JJ. 8.