Case ID: sw2d_846/html/0801-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ernestine & Charles POINER, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. SHIRLEY LIQUOR STORES, INC., Charles M. Hinkle, R.A., & Charles M. Hinkle, Defendants/Respondents.
    No. 61987.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Feb. 23, 1993.
    Michael R. Gibbons, Christian Stiegemeyer, Kirkwood, for appellant.
    Respondent, pro se.
    Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, whose property had been levied upon, appeals from an order denying his motion to quash execution. We affirm. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).