Case ID: ny_124/html/0647-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George Dintruff, an Infant by Guardian, etc., Respondent, v. The Rochester City and Brighton Railroad Company, Appellant.
    (Argued February 4, 1891;
    decided March 3, 1891.)
    Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made March 25, 1890, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
    
      Thomas Saines for appellant.
    
      Walter S. Hubbell for respondent.
   Agree to affirm ; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.