Case ID: ohio-st-3d_64/html/0452-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cincinnati Bar Association v. Fehler-Schultz.
    [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Fehler-Schultz (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 452.]
    (No. 92-417
    Submitted June 2, 1992
    Decided September 2, 1992.)
    
      
      Gates T. Richards, Thomas M. Tepe and Edwin W. Patterson III, for relator.
    
      Charles W. Kettlewell, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and agree with the board’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. We also agree with the board’s recommendation and are not persuaded by respondent’s objections thereto. Thus, we order that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio, consistent with the board’s recommendation. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.