Case ID: sw3d_482/html/0498-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": ". PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Devon Hassan NABORS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 102572
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    
    Filed: February 23, 2016
    Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Rachel Sara Flaster, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent.
    Before Robert M. Clayton III, P. J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
   ORDER

. PER CURIAM

Devon Hassan Nabors pled guilty to first-degree robbery and armed criminal action arising out of an incident in which Nabors forcibly stole a wallet and cell phone from a .victim while displaying and threatening the use of a deadly weapon outside of a movie theatre in St. Louis County. Nabors filed a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.alleging that his trial counsel was ineffective for advising him that if'he pled guilty, he would be placed on probation, and for failing to advocate for a more favorable sentencing disposition by-introducing additional evidence regarding Nabors’ character. Because we do not find the motion court’s findings and conclusions to be clearly erroneous, we affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).