Case ID: nys_72/html/1114-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

KREIZER, Respondent, v. KITAOKA, Appellant.
    (City Court of New York,
    General Term.
    May, 1901.)
    Action by Bernard Kreizer against Yoshizo ICitaoka.
    Stern, Singer & Barr (William J. Barr, of counsel), for appellant. Fromrne Bros. (James A. Dtiuglas, of counsel), for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from must be affirmed. The record shows willful contempt for the court's mandate. The defendant disposed of his property contrary to the injunction contained in the order for his examination, thereby causing plaintiff’s damage in at least the sum of $250. The order appealed from is affirmed, with costs. Order affirmed, with costs.