Case ID: ohio-law-abs_6/html/0236-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      KUNKLE, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SPYGLASS v. SPYGLASS.
    Ohio Appeals, 2nd Dist., Clark Co.
    62. ALIMONY — 681. Jurisdiction.
    In action for alimony alone, plaintiff must, by proper process, bring property of defendánt within jurisdiction of court.
    George W. Daniels and C. S. Olinger, Springfield, for plaintiff in error.
    A. C. Link, Springfield, for defendant in error.
   KUNKLE, J.

Where the plaintiff in an action for alimony alone brings suit in the county of her residence, the fact that the. plaintiff has not by any process brought the property of defendant located in the same county within the control of the court prevents the court from taking jurisdiction of the same.

(Allread and Ferneding, JJ., concur.)

For reference to full opinion, see Omnibus Index, last page, this issue.