Case ID: neb_235/html/0702-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dean Earl Hammel, appellant, v. Transit Authority of the City of Omaha, doing business as Metro Area Transit, appellee.
    457 N.W.2d 274
    Filed July 6, 1990.
    No. 88-831.
    David F. Eaton and James E. Schaefer, of Gallup & Schaefer, for appellant.
    Timothy M. Kenny and Sandra L. Maass, of Abrahams, Kaslow & Cassman, for appellee.
    Hastings, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, and Fahrnbruch, J J.
   Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and recommendation of the Appellate Division of the District Court, we determine that the record supports a finding that the negligence of the plaintiff-appellant was more than slight when compared to the negligence, if any, of the defendant-appellee, which was less than gross, and accordingly the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.