Case ID: sw_220/html/0171-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "I-ITJFF, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

McKAY v. FULGHAM et ux.
    (No. 1616.)
    (Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Amarillo.
    March 3, 1920.)
    Appeal from District Court, Clay County ; Wm. N. Bonner, Judge.
    Action by J. W. Fulgham and wife against It. McKay. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.
    Reversed and rendered.
    Wood & Wood, of Dallas, and Stine & Stine, of Henrietta, for appellant.
    Taylor, Allen & Taylor, Wantland & Dickey, and L. W. Parrish, all of Henrietta, for ap-pellees.
   I-ITJFF, C. J.

This is a companion case with 1615, McKay v. Tally, 220 S. W. 167, this day handed down. The allegations for cancellation of the oil lease are substantially the same as in that case. The terms of the lease are the same here as there, and the facts established on the trial are identical, except that $96 was paid before the time limit expired to the Wor-sham Banking Company.

This ease will be ruled by the Tally Case, and upon the authority of that ease we reverse and render this one.