Case ID: so2d_185/html/0784-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ernest SOLOMON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 65-607.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    May 3, 1966.
    Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender and Phillip A. Hubbart, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before HENDRY, C. J., and CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

On this appeal by the defendant below, Ernest Solomon, from a judgment of conviction for breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and for grand larceny, reversal is sought on the ground that his confession, received at trial, should have been excluded because it was the fruit of an unlawful arrest. The trial judge concluded the arrest in this case, made without a warrant under § 901.15(2), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., was lawful in the circumstances presented. On consideration of the record and briefs we find no sufficient ground or reason to disturb that holding.

Affirmed.