Case ID: ohio-st-2d_62/html/0085-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bar Association of Greater Cleveland v. Sato.
    [Cite as Bar Assn. v. Sato (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 85.]
    (D.D. No. 80-3
    Decided April 16, 1980.)
    
      
      Mr. Thomas R. Skulina and Mr. Shia M. Shapiro, for relator.
   Per Curiam.

Upon examination of the record and the findings of the board of commissioners, we conclude that there are ample facts to justify the board’s finding that respondent violated DR 9-102(B)(3), DR 9-102(B)(l) and DR 6-101(A)(3) of the Code of Professional Responsibility.

We confirm the recommendation of the board, that respondent be permanently disbarred from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.