Case ID: misc_10/html/0779-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Ehrlich, Ch. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Moses Hertz, Respondent, v. Clara Minzesheimer, Appellant.
    Appeal from a judgment on verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant.
    
      Joel M. Marx, for appellant.
    
      langbei/a Bros. <& Lcmgbe-m, for respondent.
   Ehrlich, Ch. J.

The action was for brokerage, and the contention narrowed down to the question whether the defendant was to pay the plaintiff $500, or one-half of one per cent of the price received by the defendant, which latter sum, amounting to $157.50, defendant paid to the plaintiff, who received the same and claimed it to be on account of the $500.

The evidence is conflicting, and the jury, under a clear and impartial charge, found for the plaintiff.

We find no reason to disturb the verdict, and the judgment entered thereon must be affirmed, with costs.

Newburger, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.