Case ID: sw3d_569/html/0563-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Antron TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 106923
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    FILED: March 12, 2019
    Ryan Fanning, 1010 Market St., Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
    Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr. J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM

Antron Taylor ("Taylor") appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion seeking post-conviction relief. Taylor pleaded guilty to a Class C felony of stealing in violation of Section 570.030. Taylor argues appeal that, pursuant to State v. Bazell, 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. banc 2016), his sentence should have been based on a class A misdemeanor, not a class C felony. Because Bazell does not apply retroactively to Taylor's plea and sentencing, we affirm the motion court's judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).