Case ID: f-appx_697/html/0223-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Irma Ivonne LANWGLOIS-ROLDAN, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 16-2445
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: August 28, 2017
    Decided: September 21, 2017
    Anna M. Gallagher, MAGGIO & KAT-TAR, P.C., Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readier, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Dawn S. Conrad, Senior Litigation Counsel, Remi Da Rocha-Afodu, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    
      Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Irma Ivonne Lanwglois-Roldan, á native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her untimely motion to reopen. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including Lanwglois-Roldan’s supporting evidence and conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re Lanwglois-Roldan (B.I.A. Dec. 9, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED