Case ID: f-appx_21/html/0104-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Raymond JIMENEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Steven J. GAL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 01-6969.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 24, 2001.
    Decided Oct. 15, 2001.
    Raymond Jimenez, pro se.
    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Raymond Jimenez appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jimenez v. Gal, No. CA-01-2148-4-19BF (D.S.C. May 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.