Case ID: so3d_263/html/0277-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Naim STEWART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 1D16-3644 1D16-3646
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    February 5, 2019
    Candice K. Brower, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Michael J. Titus, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

In these Anders appeals, we affirm the orders revoking Appellant's probation and imposing sentence. However, we remand for correction of the written orders of revocation to specify the conditions Appellant was found to have violated. See Davis v. State , 218 So.3d 507 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (affirming revocation of probation in Anders appeal but remanding for court to enter written revocation order specifying conditions of probation violated). Appellant need not be present. See Williams v. State , 145 So.3d 984 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED .

Roberts, Wetherell, and Makar, JJ., concur. 
      
      Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).