Case ID: f-appx_195/html/0589-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Donald Eugene LOW, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 04-30440.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 24, 2006.
    
    Filed July 28, 2006.
    Craig W. Haller, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, for Plaintiff— Appellee.
    John P. Rhodes, Esq., Federal Defenders of Montana, Missoula, MT, for Defendant — Appellant.
    Before: ALARCÓN, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Donald Eugene Low appeals from the 21-month sentence imposed for violation of conditions of supervised release, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Low argues the imposition of supervised release increased the maximum penalty provided by the statute of conviction and thereby violated his Sixth Amendment rights. Low’s argument is foreclosed by United States v. Huerta-Pimental, 445 F.3d 1220, 1223-25 (9th Cir.2006).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.