Case ID: nd_27/html/0456-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GEORGE W. LYNN v. PATTERSON LAND COMPANY.
    (147 N. W. 264.)
    Opinion filed April 13, 1914.
    Appeal from the District Court of Emmons County, Winchester, J.
    Dismissed.
    
      Watson & Young, Eargo, N. D. (Durment, Moore, & Oppenheimer, and Ashley Coffman, of St. Paul, Minn., of counsel), for appellant.
    
      B. N. Stevens, Bismarck, N. D., Harry C. Lynn, Linton, N. D., and Newton, Dullam, & Young, Bismarck, N. D., for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

This appeal involves a motion of the defendant to be relieved from a judgment taken against him upon stipulation. The lands in controversy are those involved in the four cases of Patterson Land Co. v. Lynn, ante, 391, 147 N. W. 256; Hackney v. Lynn, post, 458, 147 N. W. 263; Hoerr v. Lynn, ante, 449, 147 N. W. 263; and Boynton v. Lynn, below, 147 N. W. 263, recently decided by this court. The four cases mentioned above settle the entire controversy, and there is no necessity for a decision upon the errors herein assigned, the same being now merely moot questions. The appeal will be dismissed.