Case ID: so2d_444/html/0572-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Shanker S. AGARWAL and Pushpa Agarwal, Appellants, v. BANK OF FLORIDA IN SOUTH FLORIDA, Manuel Olazabal and Jose I. Caballero, Appellees.
    No. 83-116.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Feb. 1, 1984.
    Robert A. Plafsky of Ruden, Barnett, McClosky, Schuster & Russell, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
    Karen B. Bernstein of Blank, Rome, Co-misky & McCauley, Miami, for appellee Bank of Florida in South Florida.
   PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. Upon review of the record we conclude that an issue of material fact does exist as to the appellee bank’s alleged responsibility for the appellants’ inability to timely meet their obligations under the mortgage instrument sued upon. Accordingly, the entry of summary judgment was error.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and BERANEK and WALDEN, JJ., concur.