Case ID: f-appx_473/html/0641-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lovejit SINGH, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 09-71974.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted May 15, 2012.
    
    Filed May 22, 2012.
    Katherine Lesley Curtis, Adila Law Group, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.
    David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Lance Lomond Jolley, Esquire, Trial, OIL, Anthony Cardozo Payne, Senior Litigation Counsel, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
    Before: CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Lovejit Singh, native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Kumar v. INS, 204 F.3d 931, 933 (9th Cir. 2000). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Singh failed to meet his burden of establishing past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.13(a); see also Halim v. Holder, 590 F.3d 971, 975-77 (9th Cir. 2009). In the absence of past persecution, Singh’s humanitarian asylum claim necessarily fails. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.13(b)(1)(iii).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.