Case ID: f-appx_3/html/0110-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Blake JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Blake Johnson, Defendant-Appellant.
    Nos. 00-6896, 00-6940.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 8, 2001.
    Decided Feb. 13, 2001.
    Jeffrey Blake Johnson, pro se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, VA, for appellee.
    Before WILKINS, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Blake Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000) and denying his motion for a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny § 2255 relief and the court’s opinion denying a certificate of appealability, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Johnson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Jeffrey, Nos. CR-94-61; CA-98-403-7 (E.D. Va. Apr. 28 & July 3, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.