Case ID: nys_98/html/1109-10.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

OWEN, Appellant, v. WHITEHOUSE, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    March 9, 1906.)
    Action by Percy Owen against James Whitehouse.
   PER CURIAM.

We think the defect complained of was an irregularity merely, amendable under section 721 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure; and, as it clearly appears that the defendant was not misled, the motion to vacate the attachment should have been denied. The order appealed from is reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with costs.

JENKS, J., dissents.