Case ID: sw_278/html/1117-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BERRY, J. PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ike TATOM v. STATE.
    (No. 9637.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Dec. 9, 1925.)
    Appeal from District ■ Court, Houston County; Ben E. Dent, Judge. Nat Patton, of Crockett, for appellant. Sam D. Stinson, State’s Atty., of Austin, and Nat Gentry, Jr.,- Asst. State’s Atty., of Tyler, for the State..
   BERRY, J.

The offense is transporting intoxicating liquor, and the punishment is one year in the penitentiary. The record is before us without any bills of exceptions. We have made a carefpl examination of the statement of facts, and, if the state’s testimony is believed, it is ample to show that the appellant is guilty of transporting intoxicating liquor. The issues were presented to the jury in a charge to which no exception was taken, and the jury has deemed it proper to give full credit to the state’s testimony, and we are not authorized under the facts of this case to disturb their verdict. Finding no -error in tlie record, the judgment is in all things affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.