Case ID: sw2d_897/html/0203-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

66 DRIVE-IN, INC., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. HYCEL PARTNERS III, L.P., Hycel III, Inc., and Schnuck Markets, Inc., Defendants/Respondents.
    No. 66845.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    May 2, 1995.
    
      Daniel T. Rabbitt, Matthew J. Sauter, Rabbitt, Pitzer & Snodgrass, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Gerard T. Carmody, Dan M. Lesicko, Bryan Cave, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before AHRENS, P.J., GRIMM, C.J., and KAROHL, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff 66 Drive-In appeals the dismissal of its petition against the guarantors of a development agreement for interest on plaintiffs condemnation award after the developer abandoned the condemnation of plaintiffs land.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).