Case ID: nj-eq_91/html/0330-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Emma W. Noll et al., complainants-appellants, v. Rosedale Cemetery Association, respondent.
    [Submitted December 8th, 1919.
    Decided March 1st, 1920.]
    On appeal from the court of chancery.
    
      Messrs. Vail & McLean, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. Ciarle McK. Whiltemore, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. Abram II. Cornish, for the receiver..
   Pee Curiam.

The present ease is precisely similar in its determining features to Bliss v. Rosedale Cemetery Association, No. 20 of the present term. Por tire reasons stated in the per curiam filed in that case, the decree herein will be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Swayze, Trbnoiiard;, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kausoh, Black, White,. Heepeniteimer, Williams, Taylor. Gardner, Ackerson — 14.

For reversal — None.