Case ID: f-appx_690/html/0665-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Reyna, Circuit Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CROSSROADS SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant v. ORACLE CORPORATION, NetApp Inc., Appellees
    2016-1930
    2016-1931
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    Decided: June 6, 2017
    Robebt P. Courtney, Fish & Richardson P.C., Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented by John A. Drag-seth, Conrad Gosen; Russell T. Wong, Blank Rome LLP, Houston, TX.
    Jared Bobrow, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Red-wood Shores, CA, argued for appellees. Also represented by Amanda Branch, Dereic C. Walter.
    Before. Reyna, Linn, and Chen, Circuit Judges.
   Reyna, Circuit Judge.

Crossroads Systems, Inc. (“Crossroads”) appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (“PTAB”) inter partes review (“IPR”) decisions finding claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 10, 11, 13, and 14-39 of U.S. Patent No. 7,051,147 (“147 patent”) unpatentable as obvious.

Our decision today in Crossroads Systems, Inc. v. Cis-co Systems, Inc. et al., Nos. 2016-2017, -2026, and -2027, addresses. largely the same arguments and finds the same claims of the ’147 patent to be unpatentable. For the reasons articulated in that decision, here too we affirm.

These two appeals further argue that the PTAB erred in finding certain claims obvious over a combination of U.S. Patent No, 6,219,771 (“Kikuchi”) and other references. This is an independent ground of obviousness. Because we have already-found these claims obvious based on other references, we need not reach these arguments.

AFFIRMED

Costs

Each party to bear its own costs.