Case ID: sw3d_388/html/0601-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jherrit M. STANSBERRY, Appellant, v. STATE Of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 98472.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Dec. 18, 2012.
    Lisa M. Stroup, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Andrew C. Hooper, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J., and ELLEN LEVY SIWAK, Sp.J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jherrit M. Stansberry appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying his request for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).