Case ID: wis-2d_57/html/0773-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Randall, Respondent, v. Geoffrey and wife, Defendants: Pump, Appellant.
    
      No. 289.
    
    
      Submitted March 1, 1973.
    
    Decided March 27, 1973.
    
    (Also reported in 205 N .W. 2d 164.)
    For the appellant the cause was submitted on the brief of Stan L. Lenchek of Milwaukee.
    For the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of Herbert L. Usow of Milwaukee, attorney, and Jerome E. Randall of counsel, of Brookfield.
   Per Curiam.

This court has repeatedly and recently stated the rules to be applied when reviewing a complaint attacked by demurrer. See Town of Salem v. Kenosha County, ante, p. 432, 204 N. W. 2d 467, and cases cited therein.

Additionally, on demurrer the facts alleged in the complaint are assumed to be true and the difficulty the plaintiff may have in proving them is immaterial. Ritterbusch v. Ritterbusch (1971), 50 Wis. 2d 633, 184 N. W. 2d 865.

Applying these well-established rules the court concludes on this general demurrer to the complaint that the facts alleged are sufficient to state a cause of action on ■ behalf of the plaintiff as assignee against the defendant, the co-assignee, for the proceeds on the note.

The order is affirmed.