Case ID: sw_160/html/0681-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DAYIDSON, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BRADFORD v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Nov. 12, 1913.)
    Criminal Law (§§ ' 1092, 1099*) — Appeal — Bill op Exception and Statement op Facts — Eppect op Delay in Filing.
    Where in a criminal case the bills of exception were filed 183 days after the adjournment of court, and the statement of facts 160 days after the adjournment, and no excuse for the delay was given, the matters contained in the bills and statement cannot be considered.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2803, 2829, 2834-2861, 2866-2880, 2919; Dec. Dig. §§ 1092, 1099.*]
    Appeal from District Court, Angelina County; L. D. Guinn, Judge.
    Spence Bradford was convicted of violating the Local Option Law, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   DAYIDSON, J.

This conviction was for violation of the local option law.

The bills of exception were filed something like 183 days after adjournment of court, and no reasons assigned why this delay. The statement of facts was filed about 150 days after the adjournment of court, and no reason given why the same was not filed in time. With the record in this condition, none of these matters can be entertained nor considered. In the absence of a statement of facts and bills of exception, there is nothing that this court can revise.

The judgment is affirmed.