Case ID: ad2d_292/html/0193-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Al Rosa, Appellant.
    [739 NYS2d 41]
   Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Leibovitz, J.), rendered November 6, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 51/2 to 11 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant’s claims are similar to arguments rejected by this Court on the codefendant’s appeal (People v Washington, 289 AD2d 77) and we see no reason to reach a different result herein.

The court’s Sandoval ruling balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion (see, People v Walker, 83 NY2d 455, 458-459; People v Mattiace, 77 NY2d 269, 275-276; People v Pavao, 59 NY2d 282, 292). The People were permitted to elicit the fact that defendant had three felony convictions but were only permitted to identify the most recent conviction as a drug sale conviction even though all three were for selling drugs.

We perceive no basis for a reduction of sentence. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Sullivan, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.