Case ID: a3d_154-2/html/1007-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MEADOWBROOK CENTER, INC. v. Robert BUCHMAN
    Supreme Court of Connecticut.
    Decided February 1, 2017
    Daniel J. Klau, in support of the petition.
    Juri E. Taalman, in opposition.
    The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 169 Conn. App. 527, 151 A.3d 404 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issue:
    "Did the Appellate Court properly rule that the time limitation contained in the rules of practice governing motions for attorney's fees in Practice Book § 11-21 is directory and not mandatory?"
    PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.