Case ID: f-appx_267/html/0880-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthew Brent FINDLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-14442
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    March 5, 2008.
    William Gregory Hughes, Mobile, AL, for D efendant-App ell ant.
    Steven E. Butler, Justice Dept., Civil Rights Division, Employment Litigation Section, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and HULL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

William Gregory Hughes, counsel for Matthew Brent Findley in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Findley’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.