Case ID: f2d_510/html/1363-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cecil TINER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 74-3835
    Summary Calendar.*
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    April 3, 1975.
    Emily Gassenheimer, Montgomery, Ala. (Court appointed), for petitioner-appellant.
    William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., David W. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., Montgomery, Ala., for respondent-appellee.
    Before THORNBERRY, MORGAN and RONEY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The summary judgment rendered below is vacated and this cause remanded for a hearing to determine whether the appellant deliberately bypassed his state remedies. Should the district court find that appellant did not deliberately bypass such remedies, the constitutional questions presented by the appellant’s petition for habeas corpus warrant a full hearing on the merits.