Case ID: ad_240/html/1006-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Petition of Emma E. Haar, Appellant, to Render and Settle Her Account as Administratrix with the Will Annexed of All and Singular the Goods, Chattels and Credits Which Were of George Haar, Deceased. Lester F. J. Moller and Others, as Executors, etc., of Annie J. Haar, Deceased, Respondents.
    
    
      
      Affd., 264 N. Y. 681.
    
   That part of the decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county which confirmed the report of the referee and allowed the claim of the executors of the last will and testament of Annie J. Haar, deceased, to the extent of $5,298.92, with interest from January 12, 1932, reversed on the law and the facts and said claim disallowed, with costs to the appellant out of the estate of Annie J. Haar, deceased. In our opinion, the burden was on the representatives of Annie J. Haar to prove the claim of her estate, which burden did not shift and was not sustained by the proofs. In all other respects the decree is unanimously affirmed. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.