Case ID: so2d_219/html/0429-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STOUFFERS ANACAPRI INN AND RESTAURANT and insurance Company of North America, Petitioners, v. Mary Ann OATES, Respondent.
    No. 37637.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Feb. 26, 1989.
    Frank M. Hamilton, of Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioners.
    John A. Thabes, of Saunders, Curtis, Ginestra & Gore, Fort Lauderdale, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondent;'
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 24, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees filed by respondent is granted in the amount of $250.00.

ERVIN, C. J., and THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKTNS and BOYD, JJ., concur.