Case ID: nj-eq_94/html/0571-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marie E. Ziesel, respondent, v. William Ziesel, appellant.
    [Decided November 22d, 1923.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning, whose opinion is reported in 93 N. J. Eq. 153.
    
    
      Mr. D. Trueman Stackhouse, for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. Leap, Sharpless & Way, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance — The ' Chiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Williams, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—12.

For reversal—None.