Case ID: f3d_466/html/0549-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Paul Gregory HOUSE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ricky BELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 00-6136.
    United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
    Oct. 25, 2006.
    Stephen M. Kissinger, Federal Defender Services, Knoxville, TN, for Petitioner-Appellant.
    Alice B. Lustre, Asst. Atty. General, Jennifer L. Smith, Asst. Atty. General, Office of the Attorney General, Michael E. Moore, Solicitor General, Paul G. Summers, Attorney General, Tennessee Attorney General’s, Nashville, TN, for Respondent-Appellee.
   ORDER

This appeal is now before us on remand from the Supreme Court, House v. Bell, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2064, 165 L.Ed.2d 1 (2006). In light of the Court’s opinion (and the Tennessee attorney general’s statement in respondent’s brief before the Supreme Court that unexhausted issues remain under Tenn.Code. Ann. § 40-30-117(a)(2)(4)), we ask that the parties submit letter briefs addressing whether remand to the courts of Tennessee is appropriate in order to allow petitioner to exhaust his state-court remedies on his actual innocence claim.

Letter briefs shall be due within sixty days of this order and shall not exceed fifteen pages.