Case ID: f-appx_216/html/0005-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROLE MODELS AMERICA, INC., d/b/a National Role Models Academy-College Corps, Appellant v. PENMAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and James A. LaFleur, Appellees.
    No. 05-5421.
    United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
    Feb. 2, 2007.
    Donald M. Temple, Law Office of Donald M. Temple, Washington, DC, for Appellant.
    Timothy Francis McCormack, Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP, Baltimore, MD, R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellees.
    Before: SENTELLE and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges; and EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This case was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the order of the District Court granting the defendants-appellees summary judgment be affirmed for the reasons well stated in Part II.A.1 of the District Court’s Memorandum Opinion. See Role Models America, Inc. v. PenMar Dev. Corp., 394 F.Supp.2d 121, 130-34 (D.D.C.2005).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.