Case ID: colo_28/html/0098-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 4279.]
    Beckwith, Secretary of State v. Richards.
    Opinion Followed.
    This case is decided upon the opinion in the case of Beekmith v. Winters et al., ante p. 96.
    
      Upon Review from the District Court of Arapahoe County.
    
    
      Mr. Ben. B. Lindsey and Mr. Sam, W. Bedford for petitioner.
    Messrs. Ward & Ward for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

This case in its essential features is like that of Beckwith v. Winters et. al., ante p. 96, and the decision there governs here. The name of respondent should not appear upon the official ballot as the nominee of the so-called Fusion party. The district court thought it should. Its judgment, however, is reversed, and petitioner is ordered to exclude respondent’s name.

Reversed.