Case ID: ny-st-rep_53/html/0352-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The Union Square Bank of the City of New York, Resp't, v. Theodor Reichmann, Impl’d, App’lt.
    
      (Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,
    
    
      Filed May 12, 1893.)
    
    Appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate a warrant of attachment.
    
      A. W. Kent, for app’lt; Fromme Bros., for resp’t
   Per Curiam.

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, for the reasons stated in the opinion in the case of Hanover Nat. Bank v. Stebbins (decided herewith.)

Van Brunt, P. J., and Follett, J., concur.