Case ID: ga-app_31/html/0184-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

14986, 14987.
    Daniel v. The State (two cases).
    Decided November 15, 1923.
    Indictment for assault and battery, etc.; from Randolph superior court—Judge Custer presiding. July 28, 1923.
    
      Charles W. Worrill, for plaintiff: in error.
    
      B. T. Casiellow, solicitor-general, B. B. Arnold, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

There is sufficient evidence to support the finding of the jury, which is approved by the trial judge, and, as no error of law was committed, the court properly refused a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., eoneur.