Case ID: or-app_162/html/0674-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Submitted on record and briefs August 6,
    reversed and remanded September 15, 1999
    STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RICARDO QUINTERO, Appellant.
    
    (97038212C and 97048245C;
    CA A102861 (Control) and CA A102862)
    (Cases Consolidated)
    986 P2d 665
    David E. Groom, Public Defender, and Stephen J. Williams, Deputy Public Defender, filed the brief for appellant.
    Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
    Before De Muniz, Presiding Judge, and Haselton and Wollheim, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from the revocation of his probation, arguing that the record does not support a finding that he Imowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to counsel. The state concedes that the trial court’s failure to advise defendant of his right to counsel requires reversal of his convictions. See generally State v. Meyrick, 313 Or 125, 831 P2d 666 (1992). We agree that the record does not show that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to counsel. We therefore accept the state’s concession of error.

Reversed and remanded.