Case ID: sw3d_541/html/0013-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Nanette Sue LITHERLAND, Appellant.
    No. ED 105130
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: February 20, 2018
    Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
    Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Sherri B. Sullivan and Kurt S. Odenwald, JJ.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Nannette Litherland appeals from the judgment entered on her conviction following a jury trial for first-degree murder and first-degree assault. Finding no reasonable probability that the jury would have reached a different conclusion but for the challenged testimony, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).