Case ID: cust-ct_1/html/0423-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 39491.
    Protests 182701-G, etc., of I. Magnin & Co. et al. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Embroidered articles in part of lace similar to those involved in Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and embroidered-net veils were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.