Case ID: f-appx_390/html/0705-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mohamed Salaheldin SHARAWI, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 08-71453.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 19, 2010.
    
    Filed Aug. 2, 2010.
    Mohamed Salaheldin Sharawi,.Anaheim, CA, pro se.
    Kevin James Conway, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Richard M. Evans, Esquire, Assistant Director, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
    Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges. ■
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Mohamed Salaheldin Sharawi,- a native and citizen -of Egypt, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order .dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a continuance, Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir.2008) (per curiam), and we deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying a continuance where Sharawi did not demonstrate good cause. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29. (an IJ. may grant a motion for a continuance for good cause shown); Baires v. INS, 856 F.2d 89, 92-93 (9th Cir.1988).

..Sharawi’s remaining contentions are unavailing.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication ánd is not precedent except as provided by 9 th .Cir. R. 36-3.