Case ID: njl_110/html/0020-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

TROPHEM BORODAEFF, RESPONDENT, v. PROVINCE LINE DAIRY, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT.
    Submitted October 28, 1932
    Decided January 23, 1933.
    Por the respondent, James S. Twrp.
    
    Por the appellant, Coult, Satz & Tomlinson.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court, and reported in 109 N. J. L. 25.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Brogan, Heher, Kays, Heteield, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.