Case ID: cal-2d_42/html/0873-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      THE COURT.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

267 P.2d 819]
    [Sac. No. 6350.
    In Bank.
    Mar. 1, 1954.]
    LAWRENCE L. PICKENS et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent.
    F. H. Bowers and Thomas F. Sargent for Petitioners.
    McAllister & Johnson and Walter C. Frame for Respondent.
   THE COURT.

This is a mandamus proceeding in which the judgments in consolidated actions reviewed on appeal in Pickens v. Johnson, ante, p. 399 [267 P.2d 801], are attacked on one of the grounds urged on that appeal. Inasmuch as the appeal disposes of that issue, the petition for the writ is denied and the alternative writ discharged. (See California Toll Bridge Authority v. Durkee, 40 Cal.2d 341 [253 P.2d 673].)

Dooling, J. pro tem, sat in place of the Chief Justice, who deemed himself disqualified.