Case ID: sw3d_406/html/0088-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Byron EWING, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 98494.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Aug. 13, 2013.
    Edward Scott Thompson, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before ROBERT M. CLAYTON, III, C.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J., and MICHAEL K. MULLEN, Sp. J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Byron Ewing appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court did not clearly err in denying Ewing’s request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).