Case ID: yeates_2/html/0473-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Sed per our.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

AT NISI PRIUS, AT HARRISBURGH,
    OCTOBER ASSIZES 1799
    CORAM, YEATES AND SMITH, .JUSTICES.
    William Frantz against Jacob Harman.
    A deed produced by the adverse party on notice, shall be presumed to have been duly executed, and read in evidence without further proof.
    In trespass guare elausiom f regit, the plaintiffs counsel called for a deed from Henry Stump to him, in the defendant’s possession, pursuant to notice given, which being produced by the defendant, he contended that the same should not be read in evidence, without proof of its execution.
    Mr Laird, pro quer. Mr. Fisher, pro def.
    
   Sed per our.

Such a deed shall be presumed to have been duly executed and so are the late cases. 2 Term Rep. 41. Espin. 773.

Verdict pro quer.