Case ID: f-appx_278/html/0972-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ARGO SYSTEMS FZE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIBERTY INSURANCE PTE. LTD., Marine Insurance Services PTE. LTD., DeWitt Stern Group, Inc., DeWitt Stern, Imperatore, Ltd., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 07-15058.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    May 23, 2008.
    Thomas S. Rue, Johnstone, Adams, Bailey, Gordon & Harris, L.L.C., Mobile, AL, Michael C. Bynane, Bynane & Co., PC, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Jon W. Wise, E. Stuart Ponder, New Orleans, LA, Robert Michael Sullivan, Sullivan & Manarel, LLP, New York, NY, Norman M. Stockman, Blane Horton Crutchfield, Hand, Arendall, LLC, Mobile, AL, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before DUBINA and BARRETT, Circuit Judges, and SCHLESINGER, District Judge.
    
      
       Honorable Harvey E. Schlesinger, United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM:

Appellant Argo Systems FZE (“Argo”) appeals the district court’s order granting Appellees Liberty Insurance PTE. Ltd. (“Liberty”) and Marine Insurance Services PTE. Ltd.’s (“MIS”) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and the district court’s judgment entered in favor of Appellee DeWitt Stern, Imperatore, Ltd. (“DeWitt” or “DSI”) on Argo’s professional negligence and negligent misrepresentation claims.

After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs, and having the benefit of oral argument, we conclude that there is no merit to any of the arguments Argo makes in this appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order granting Liberty and MIS’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Moreover, we affirm the district court’s judgment entered in favor of DeWitt after a bench trial on Argo’s professional negligence and negligent misrepresentation claims.

AFFIRMED.