Case ID: so2d_89/html/0796-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carl GAINEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.
    Oct. 5, 1956.
    Rosetti, Lenas, Berchtold & Greer, St. Petersburg, for appellant.
    Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and David U. Tumin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The record and the briefs in this cause have been examined and the judgment appealed from is affirmed on authority of Cortes v. State, 135 Fla. 589, 185 So. 323; Cross v. State, 96 Fla. 768, 119 So. 380; Parrish v. State, 90 Fla. 25, 105 So. 130; Lopez v. State, Fla., 66 So.2d 807, and Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543, 39 A.L.R. 790; Section 933.13, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, HOBSON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.