Case ID: f-appx_453/html/0347-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Owen HARTY, Individually, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LUIHN FOUR, INC., a Domestic Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 10-2375.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 20, 2011.
    Decided: Nov. 16, 2011.
    
      Pete Monismith, Thomas B. Bacon, P.A., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Thomas B. Bacon, Thomas B. Bacon, P.A., Cooper City, Florida, for Appellant. Richard S. MeA-tee, Paul S. Holscher, Jackson Lewis LLP, Cary, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before GREGORY and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Owen Harty appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his claim arising under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189 (2006), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harty v. Luihn Four, Inc., 747 F.Supp.2d 547 (E.D.N.C.2010); (Nov. 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.