Case ID: nys_34/html/1147-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ST. LOUIS STAMPING CO., Appellant, v. PIPER, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.
    June 14, 1895.)
    Action by the St. Louis Stamping Company against Elwin S. Piper. For decision at special term, see 33 N. Y. Supp. 443.
    A. v. Briesen, for appellant.
    Samuel Üntermyer, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We do not think that an injunction pendente lite ought to be granted. The order appealed from should be affirmed, with §10 costs and .disbursements.