Case ID: so2d_810/html/1093-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rudolph HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 5D02-529.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    March 22, 2002.
    
      Rudolph Harris, Lawtey, pro se.
    No Appearance for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a negotiated plea, Rudolph Harris was convicted of the lesser-included offense of possession of cocaine and received a four year sentence. In his Rule 3.850 motion, he alleges the existence of several errors in his seoresheet. The trial court in its order acknowledges the existence of seoresheet errors but declined to grant any relief because he entered a plea in exchange for a specific term of years.

The trial court ruled correctly. Seoresheet errors are harmless when the sentence is the result of a negotiated plea agreement. See, e.g., Hill v. States 730 So.2d 322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). The transcript reflects that Harris entered his plea in exchange for a four year sentence, not a guidelines sentence. Moreover, as the court points out in its order, he does not seek to withdraw his plea.

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, PLEUS and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur. 
      
      . Rule 3.850, Fla. R.Crim. Pro. (1999).