Case ID: ga_147/html/0621-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Valdosta Bank & Trust Company et al. v. Arnold et al.
    
    No. 344.
    February 13, 1918.
    Equitable petition. Before Judge Thomas. Lowndes superior court. April 21, 1917.
    
      Woodward & Smith and E. E. Wilcox, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Whitaker & Dukes, contra.
   Per Curiam.

The assignments of error based on excerpts from the charge, when considered in connection with the entire charge and the evidence, do not require a reversal. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Jiistices concur.