Case ID: f-appx_308/html/0147-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tomas SALINAS-RUIZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-30168.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 17, 2008.
    
    Filed Jan. 14, 2009.
    Donald E. Kresse, Jr., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.
    Rebecca L. Pennell, Federal Defenders of Eastern Washington & Idaho, Yakima, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: GOODWIN, TROTT, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Tomas Salinas-Ruiz appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss the indictment charging him with being an alien in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Salinas-Ruiz contends that the district court erred by denying his motion to dismiss the indictment because the indictment did not allege that his prior removal occurred subsequent to a felony conviction. This contention fails. See Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 226-27, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998); see also United States v. Salazar-Lopez, 506 F.3d 748, 752 (9th Cir.2007).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.