Case ID: sw2d_864/html/0405-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Matthew MOOREHEAD, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 64048.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Nov. 2, 1993.
    S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for movant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen. and Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Matthew Moorehead, appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 29.15 motion.. The trial court dismissed his motion as untimely. See Rule 29.15(b).

The order of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The order of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).