Case ID: so2d_508/html/0542-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. James D. BROWN, Appellee.
    Nos. 86-2688, 86-2689.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 16, 1987.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Julie S. Thornton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
    Joseph W. Gibson, Miami, for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The appellee, James D. Brown, concedes that the trial court did not furnish any reasons, written or otherwise, for its downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. We reverse the sentences imposed and remand to the trial court with directions to resentence the defendant within the guidelines. In so doing, v/e direct the trial court’s attention to Williams v. State, 500 So.2d 501, 503 (Fla.1986), wherein the court stated, “If a departure is not supported by clear and convincing reasons, the mere fact that a defendant agrees to it does not make it a legal sentence.” See also State v. McCarthy, 502 So.2d 955 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

Reversed and remanded with directions.