Case ID: f-appx_310/html/0567-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Wesley Edward SMITH, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP; Lynn Hollan; John T. Cahill; Bob Marshall; Herb Jarvis; Russ Arnold; Sean Helsel; Johns Berisford; Tim Rosetti; Jeff Stevens; Paulette Aliviti; Michael Fowler; Steve Barberio; Joe Voderic; Richard Simmons; Sharon Sullivan; Eric Mizell; Mike Correa; Jennifer Pankake; Robert Kuenzli; Jesse Washington; Cassandra Atcherson; Yates Brown, M.D.; Jody M. Smitherman; Scott Katrosh; Ashely B. Able; Johnnie Devine; Joseph Jerry Abraham; Irvin Haynes; Tom Mizell; Myra Hill; Roy Miller, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 08-1959.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 16, 2008.
    Decided Dec. 19, 2008.
    Wesley Edward Smith, III, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wesley Edward Smith, III, appeals the district court’s order accepting the of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Pepsi Bottling Group, No. 2:08-cv-02281-DCN (D.S.C. Aug. 21, 2008). Additionally, we deny Smith’s motion to dismiss. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.