Case ID: ohio-st_171/html/0552-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cruikshank v. Sacks, Warden.
    (No. 36714
    Decided March 1, 1961.)
    
      Mr. Edwin Cruikshank, in propria persona.
    
    
      Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, and Mr. Aubrey A. Wendt, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Petitioner had an adequate remedy by wav\ of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence to review the alleged irregularities of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur.