Case ID: sw2d_913/html/0066-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronald Lee CLARK, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Wanda Mariane CLARK, Respondent/Appellant.
    No. 67369.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Dec. 19, 1995.
    Jeffrey P. Dix, Jackson, for appellant.
    John D. Harding, Limbaugh, Russell, Payne & Howard, Cape Girardeau, for respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals from the trial court’s order of modification of the child support provisions of the dissolution decree. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).