Case ID: ohio-law-abs_5/html/0075-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 96
    MATUSOFF v. SHALF
    No. 20239.
    Supreme Court
    On motion to certify.
    Dock. Dec. 30, 1926,
    5 Abs. 27.
    997.’ REAL ESTATE- — Is real estate salesman entitled to commission where he procures real estate exchange instead of sale where contract reads that he must procure a purchaser ready and willing to buy?
    Attorneys — W. S. Rhotehamel and I. L. Jackson for Matusoff; J.| H. Shively and C. D. Thompson for Shalf; all of Dayton.
   Isaac Matusoff et contends in the Supreme Court that when he procured an' exchange of real estate, the same entitles him to full commission even though he was working under contract to find a purchaser ready and willing to buy.