Case ID: so2d_541/html/0704-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert VANUCHI, Appellant, v. MIAMI PURVEYORS, INC., and B.M.Z. Corp., d/b/a Mr. Pips, Appellees.
    Nos. 87-3039, 88-0495.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    March 29, 1989.
    Rehearing Denied May 11, 1989.
    
      Michael Winer of Michael Winer, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    A. Norman Drucker, North Miami Beach, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm, concluding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for continuance, nor did it err in awarding plaintiff Miami Purveyors an attorney’s fee based on the legend, providing for same, upon the invoices which accompanied the deliveries and which were signed by some employee of the receiving restaurant.

GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., and KAHN, MARTIN D., Associate Judge, concur.