Case ID: so2d_576/html/0931-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DAUKSCH, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Montgomery Scott SHIEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 90-1239.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    March 28, 1991.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Paolo G. Annino, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
   DAUKSCH, Judge.

We affirm the conviction and sentence of appellant and certify the following question of great public importance, as we did in Love v. State, 569 So.2d 1374 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990):

DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?

HARRIS and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.