Case ID: conn_150/html/0699-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rose Resnick v. David O. Resnick
    Baldwin, C. J., King, Murphy, Shea and Alcorn, Js.
    Argued December 5
    decided December 18, 1962
    
      Henry J. Goldberg, with whom, on the brief, was Jacob Schwolsky, for the appellant (plaintiff).
    
      A. B. Friedman, with whom, on the brief, were Samuel H. Friedman and Myron Friedman, for the appellee (defendant).
   Pee Curiam.

The finding, which is not subject to material correction, amply supports the judgment. Medvedow v. Medvedow, 140 Conn. 698, 700, 103 A.2d 337; Gowdy v. Gowdy, 120 Conn. 508, 510, 181 A. 462; Swist v. Swist, 107 Conn. 484, 490, 140 A. 820.

There is no error.