Case ID: ga_180/html/0187-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bell, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bradham v. The State.
    No. 10455.
    January 19, 1935.
    Rehearing denied February 22, 1935.
    
      H. A. Boykin, for plaintiff in error.
    
      M. J. Yeomans, attorney-general, W. G. Neville, solicitor-general, B. D. Murphy, J. T. Goree, B. L. Moore, and D. A. Bragg, contra.
   Bell, Justice.

1. The evidence, though circumstantial, was sufficient to warrant the charge on the subject of conspiracy, and to authorize the verdict of guilty.

2. The grounds'of the motion for a new trial relating to other questions, not being referred to in the briefs for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.

3. The judgment refusing a new trial was not erroneous for any reason urged.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices ooneur, except Russell, C. J., and Atkinson, J., who dissent.