Case ID: nys_104/html/1150-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WICKS, Respondent, v. BUTLER et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    May 1, 1907.)
    Action by Russell H. Wicks against Harriet L. Butler, individually and as executrix, and another, etc.
   PER CURIAM.

It appearing that appellants have failed to file and serve their printed papers on appeal as required by rule 41, and it not having been shown that a case containing exceptions is necessary, respondent’s motion to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, with $10 costs.