Case ID: so2d_240/html/0301-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Del O’NEAL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 39787.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Oct. 28, 1970.
    Lloyd H. Moe, Varón & Stahl, Hollywood, for petitioner.
    Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen. and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After oral argument and upon further consideration, we have determined the writ was improvidently issued.

The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., ROBERTS, DREW and CARLTON, JJ., and MURPHREE, Circuit Judge, concur.