Case ID: ohio-law-abs_1/html/0572-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MARX, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SPIEGEL v. KRAUS
    Superior Court, Cincinnati, Hamilton County
    No. 58672.
    Decided July 23, 1923
    SALES — Recovery for goods delivered.
    Attorneys — J. W. Kittering and Dickerson &fl Dickerson, for Spiegel; Harmon, Colston, Goldsmith" & Hoadley, for Kraus.
   MARX, J.,

Cin. Sup.

Epitomized Opinion

Kraus received certain lamp shades from Spiegel and had never returned them to Spiegel and still had possession of them. The evidence disclosed that the lamp shades were still worth the purchase price. The jury rendered a verdict for the purchase price. The court held:

1. “Kraus is not prejudiced in being required to pay the purchase price of the lamp shades.”