Case ID: ny_195/html/0518-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ray Tompkins, Respondent, v. J. & R. Lamb, Appellant.
    
      Tompkins v. Lamb, 121 App. Div. 366, affirmed.
    (Argued March 3, 1909;
    decided March 23, 1909.)
    Appeal from a judgment entered October 2, 1907, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, which reversed an order of the Trial Term granting a motion to set aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff' and for a new trial and denied said motion in an action to recover for an alleged breach of warranty.
    
      Otto O. Wierum, Jr., for appellant.
    
      F. G. Uerendeen for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hisoook and Chase, JJ.