Case ID: ccpa_17-2/html/0802-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "GRAiiam, Presiding Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harold A. Hawn v. Philip Fritz
    (No. 2215)
    United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals,
    February 6, 1930
    
      Chappell & Bari (B. L. Chappell of counsel) for appellant.
    
      Branlc B. Liveranee, jr., and John Boyle, jr., for appellee.
    [Oral argument January 14, 1930, by Mr. Liveranee and Mr. Chappell]
    Before Graham, Presiding Judge, and Bland, Hatfield, Garrett, and Lenroot, Associate Judges
   GRAiiam, Presiding Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The issues in this matter have been fully considered in No. 2214, Philip Fritz v. Harold A. Hawn, decided concurrently herewith, and no further discussion thereof is required. In accordance with our conclusion expressed in the opinion filed in said No. 2214, the decision of the Board of Appeals is affirmed.