Case ID: sw_187/html/0487-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HARPER, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BLOSS v. STATE.
    (No. 4109.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    June 7, 1916.)
    Criminal Law &wkey;>1131(4) — Appeal—Criminal Prosecution — Recognizance.
    Where accused, after conviction, instead of entering into a recognizance, gives an appeal bond and is released from custody, his appeal will be dismissed.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2974, 2976, 2977; Dec. Dig. &wkey;1131(4).]
    Appeal from District Court, Eastland County; Thomas L. Blanton, Judge.
    Edward Bloss was convicted of pandering, and appeals.
    Dismissed.
    C. C. McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   HARPER, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of pandering, and his punishment assessed at five years’ confinement in the state penitentiary.

The record contains no bills of exception, and no statement of facts accompanies the transcript.

The indictment charges an offense, and un-tier such circumstances there is no question presented we can review.

It is further made to appear that while the court was in session, appellant, instead of entering into a recognizance, gave an appeal bond and was released from custody. Consequently, the state’s motion to dismiss the appeal must be sustained.

The appeal is dismissed. 
      <§^>For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Hex-Numbered Digests and Indexes