Case ID: sarat-ch-sent_3/html/0007-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eli Benedict et al. v. Ephraim Smith et al.
    
    ^attoi molti
    E P. Smith and F. M. Haight, for complainants ; O. Hastings, for defendants.
   Decided that under the act of April 1833, (Laws •of 1833, p. 402,) a chattel mortgage must bo filed in the proper clerk’s office, unless there is an immediate delivery of the whole property embraced therein, and a continued change of possession, or the mortgage itself is absolutely and wholly void as to creditors. That a change of possession as to part of the property included in the mortgage, is not a change of possession of the things mortgaged, within the intent and meaning of the statute.

Decree of the vice chancellor affirmed with costs; upon 'the ground that the complainants have ratified the arrangement made by Griffin, by their subsequent acts, and that such subsequent ratification is equivalent to a previous authority.