Case ID: f-appx_31/html/0562-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Keith S. PERKINS, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent.
    No. 01-70100. SEC No. 3-10109.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 11, 2002.
    
    Decided March 21, 2002.
    Before CANBY, BEEZER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       Because this panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument, we deny Perkins' request for oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Keith S. Perkins petitions pro se for review of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) order sustaining the National Association of Securities Dealers’ imposition of a $7,500 fine. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78y(a)(l). We conclude that substantial evidence supports the SEC’s factual findings, and that the SEC properly affirmed the sanction. See Krull v. SEC, 248 F.3d 907, 911-12 (9th Cir.2001).

PETITION DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.