Case ID: nj-eq_119/html/0467-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edwin A. Dill, administrator, &c., appellant, v. Daniel Mountford Dill et al., respondents.
    [Decided January 31st, 1936.]
    
      Messrs. Child, Riker, Marsh & Shipman, for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. Budd & Larner, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, and reported in 118 N. J. Eq. 374.

For affirmance—Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, JJ. 7.

For reversal—The Chief-Justice, Case, Heher, Hetfield, Rafferty, JJ. 5.