Case ID: f-appx_547/html/0362-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ryan O’Neil LANSDOWNE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-7314.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 4, 2013.
    Decided: Dec. 10, 2013.
    Ryan O’Neil Lansdowne, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Kimberly Riley Pedersen, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Ryan O’Neil Lansdowne seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lansdowne, No. 1:00-cr-00185-TSE-l (E.D. Va. filed July 31, 2013 & entered Aug. 1, 2013). We deny Lansdowne’s pending motion for leave to supplement his informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.