Case ID: us_309/html/0620-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 622.
    Cady et al., doing business as C. M. Cady & Sons v. Detroit et al.
    January 29, 1940.
   Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Euclid v. Ambler, 272 U. S. 365; Cusack Co. v. Chicago, 242 U. S. 526; (2) Hatch v. Reardon, 204 U. S. 152, 160-161; Standard Food Co. v. Wright, 225 U. S. 540, 550; Warehouse Co. v. Tobacco Growers, 276 U. S. 71, 88; (3) Caperton v. Boywer, 14 Wall. 216, 236-237; Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U. S. 441, 442-443.

Mr. Edward N. Barnard for appellants.