Case ID: nj-misc_5/html/0311-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROBERT A. ALTSCHULER AND ARTHUR L. ROBINSON, PROSECUTORS, v. CHARLES W. OWEN AND THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF BERGEN, DEFENDANTS.
    Argued February 23, 1927
    Decided February 26, 1927.
    Attachments — Controversy Involves Substantial Questions of Law and Fact — Writ to Bring up Case but Not to Stay Proceedings by Auditor Appointed in Case of Keppler v. Owen.
    On application for writ of certiorari to review order of the Circuit Court discharging auditor appointed in the case of Altschuler v. Owen, in attachment.
    Before Justices Parker, Black and Campbell.
    For the prosecutors, Bex A. Altschuler.
    
    For the defendants, Sidney W. Eldridge.
    
   Per Curiam.

It is manifest that the controversy involves substantial questions of both law and fact, touching the validity and priority of conflicting attachment liens, which questions should be fully presented and argued, and maturely considered and determined.

A writ is therefore allowed, to bring up the order of December 31st, 1926, in the attachment suit of Altschuler v. Owen in the Circuit Court, and the proceedings relative thereto; but without staying proceedings by the auditor appointed in this court in the suit of Keppler v. Owen by way of selling the various items of attached property and the conversion of the same into money; the proceeds of the said various items to be separately accounted for by said auditor, and to remain subject to the further order of this court in the premises.