Case ID: ny-2d_79/html/0986-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eugene Holman, Appellant.
    Argued March 26, 1992;
    decided April 30, 1992
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Sharon D. Gray for appellant.
    
      Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (Gregory H. Mansfield and Norman Barclay of counsel), for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed. The record establishes that, in considering defendant’s Sandoval motion, the Trial Judge balanced the probative worth of the evidence against the risk of unfair prejudice to the defendant in accordance with People v Sandoval (34 NY2d 371).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Yesawich, Jr. Taking no part: Judge Simons. 
      
       Designated pursuant to NY Constitution, article VI, § 2.