Case ID: ad2d_20/html/0876-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel Glick, Respondent, v. Flick Realty Corp. et al., Appellants.
   Order, entered on June 28,1963, denying the motion of the appearing defendants to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellants, and the motions to dismiss the complaint granted, with $10 costs. The failure of the plaintiff to take any steps in the prosecution of this action for some 29 months after the joinder of issue requires that this action be dismissed unless such delay is satisfactorily explained (Sortino v. Fisher, 20 A D 2d 25; Hardware Mut. Gas. Go. v. Rosenberg, 3 A D 2d 988). Plaintiff’s affidavit, offered without a supporting medical affidavit, fails to establish his contention that illness disabled him from communicating the necessary information to his counsel so as to enable the latter to proceed in the action. (iSee, Smallen v. Shermcm Sq. Hotel Corp., 20 A D 2d 527.) It is also to be noted that the affidavit of merits fails to demonstrate the " evidentiary facts * * * in the same manner by which plaintiff expects to prove his case upon a trial” (Sortino v. Fisher, supra, p. 32). 'The affidavit is at belt eonelusory and founded principally upon hearsay. Concur — Breitel, J. P., McNally, Eager, Steuer and 'Staley, JJ.