Case ID: f-appx_19/html/0081-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kent J. ASHTON, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION; City of Concord, North Carolina, Respondents. Kent J. Ashton, Petitioner, v. Federal Aviation Administration; City of Concord, North Carolina, Respondents.
    Nos. 00-2134, 01-1562.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 13, 2001.
    Decided Sept. 20, 2001.
    Kent J. Ashton, petitioner pro se. Kenneth P. Quinn, Frank San Martin, Federal Aviation Administration, Anthony Alan Yang, Michael Jay Singer, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC; Keith J. Merritt, David Betts Hamilton, Kilpatrick Stockton, L.L.P., Charlotte, NC, for respondents.
    Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated proceedings, Kent J. Ashton filed two petitions for review of final agency decisions issued by the Associate Administrator for Airports for the Federal Aviation Administration. We have reviewed Ashton’s arguments, the record, and the orders issued by the Director, Office of Airport Safety and Standards, and the Associate Administrator and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petitions for review. We deny motions to strike informal briefs and grant Ashton’s motion to file a corrected informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITIONS DENIED.