Case ID: nw2d_292/html/0108-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Albert C. KAFKA, Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE of South Dakota, Respondent.
    No. 12703.
    Supreme Court of South Dakota.
    Considered on Briefs Nov. 16, 1979.
    Decided May 7, 1980.
    John P. Abbott, Brandon, for petitioner and appellant.
    Lori Wilbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Pierre, for respondent; Mark ' V. Meierhenry, Atty. Gen., Pierre, on the brief.
   PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from the dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief, Albert Kafka attacks the constitutionality of two jury instructions used in his trial for third-degree burglary. The instructions that he complains of are identical to those decided today # 12704, Rauscher v. State, 292 N.W.2d 106 (S.D.1980). Like Rauscher, Kafka did not object to the instructions at any time prior to the post-conviction proceedings. For the reasons set out in Rauscher, supra, the order of the trial court is affirmed. 
      
      
         State v. Kafka, 264 N.W.2d 702 (S.D.1978).