Case ID: misc2d_17/html/0149-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Andrew Sattalich, Appellant, v. Inez Liben, Also Known as Inez Berlin, Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    February 5, 1959.
    
      
      Robert Meers for appellant.
    
      Tingar \& Liven for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

A civil suit though groundless and ill motivated does not give rise to a cause of action for its prosecution.

The orders should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion to dismiss the second counterclaim in the answer granted.

Concur — Heoht, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.

Orders reversed, etc.