Case ID: a3d_89/html/1064-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Kyle M. COURTNALL, Respondent.
    No. 14-BG-103.
    District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
    Filed May 1, 2014.
    BEFORE: THOMPSON, Associate Judge, and PRYOR and NEBEKER, Senior Judges.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent’s license to practice law in the state of Virginia for a period of 15 months, this court’s February 12, 2014, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why the reciprocal discipline of disbarment should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Kyle M. Courtnall is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of 15 months. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar R. XI, § 14(g).