Case ID: sw3d_578/html/0853-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Adam NAEGER, Appellant, v. ESURANCE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
    ED 107178
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: June 28, 2019 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 29, 2019
    Brian Fellows, Fellows & Blake, LLC, 13421 Manchester Road, Suite 105, St. Louis, MO 63131, for appellant.
    Michael D. Cerulo, Erica L. Briscoe, Baty, Holm, Nurmich & Otto, P.C., 7711 Bonhomme Ave., Suite 901, St. Louis, MO 63105, for respondent.
    Before Lisa P. Page, C.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Adam Naeger ("Naeger") appeals the trial court's judgment granting summary judgment in favor of Esurance Property and Casualty Insurance Company ("Esurance"). We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).