Case ID: okla-crim_4/html/0089-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re A. H. HULING.
    No. A-723.
    Opinion Filed June 8, 1910.
    (109 Pac. 576.)
    Application of A. H. Huling for writ of mandamus.
    Writ discharged, and petitioner remanded.
    
      J. T. Shive and Henry Bulow, for petitioner.
    
      W. G. Austin and Shartel, Eeat-on & Wells for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The facts in this case are in all respects identical with those in case No. A-724, In re W. C. Jones, infra, 109 Pac. 570. This petitioner was convicted for violating the same ordinance of the town of Eldorado which Jones was charged with violating; and he makes identically the same contention made by Jones. The decision in that case is controlling in this case.

The writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued in this case will therefore be discharged, and' the petitioner remanded to the custody of the town marshal of Eldorado. It is so ordered.