Case ID: so2d_382/html/0325-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. ROBERT SMITH, Jr., J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Raymond E. PARDEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. OO-363.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Dec. 17, 1979.
    Raymond E. Pardee, in pro per.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and A. S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for ap-pellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

BOOTH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., J., dissents.

ROBERT SMITH, Jr., J.,

dissenting:

On this appeal from an order of the trial court denying Pardee’s Rule 3.850 motion, I think the record before the trial court and before this court does not conclusively show that Pardee is entitled to no relief. I do not consider it our function to pass on the credibility of Pardee’s improbable assertions. Therefore, in my opinion, an eviden-tiary hearing is required.