Case ID: f-appx_261/html/0738-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Michael Anthony HOLLOWAY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-51421
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Jan. 14, 2008.
    Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District Of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Michael Holloway was convicted of two charges of possessing cocaine and cocaine base with intent to distribute, and the district court sentenced him to serve 262 months in prison and an eight-year term of supervised release. Holloway appeals his sentence. He contends that his sentence is improper because this court’s post-Booker rulings have effectively reinstated the mandatory sentencing guideline regime condemned in Booker. This argument is foreclosed. See Rita v. United States, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2462, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

We note that there is an apparent clerical error in the judgment. Although textual portions of the judgment show that Holloway was convicted of two charges, the portion of the judgment listing the counts of conviction lists one count only. A review of the rearraignment and sentencing transcripts, as well as the textual portions of the judgment, shows that the omission of Count 2 from that portion of the judgment listing the counts of conviction is a clerical error. Accordingly, this matter is REMANDED TO THE DISTRICT COURT for correction of the clerical error in the judgment pursuant to Fed. R.CrimJP. 36. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     
      
      . United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).