Case ID: nj-eq_93/html/0223-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

F. R. Patch Manufacturing Company, respondent, v. William A. Gahagan Company et al., appellants.
    [Decided September 30th, 1921.]
    -On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Griffin, whose opinion is reported in 98 N. J. Eq. 7-8.
    
    
      Mr. Leon. Abbeit. fox the respondent.
    
      Mr. Robert Carey, for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalis oil, Black, Katzenbach, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk — 14.

For reversal — None.