Case ID: njl_75/html/0938-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

OTTO H. URBANECK, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued January 6, 1908 —
    Decided June 15, 1908.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiff in error, Vredenburgh, Wall & Carey.
    
    For the defendant in error, Weller & Lichtenstein.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Reed, delivered in the court below, reported in 45 Vroom 393.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Bogert, Vroom, Green. Gray, Dill, J.J. 11.

For reversal — None.