Case ID: nj-eq_96/html/0672-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harry H. Tantum, respondent, v. Anna Keller, appellant.
    [Decided October 20th, 1924.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan, whose opinion is reported in 95 N. J. Fq. J/.66.
    
    
      Mr. Gassel R. Ruhlman, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. James J. McGoogan, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion hied in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays-—15.

For reversal—None.