Case ID: so3d_267/html/0068-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "In this trip and fall case I would grant and docket the writ application of State of Louisiana/Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) to examine whether the plaintiff has presented sufficient factual support to establish the existence of a genuine issue of material fact: whether DOTD \"had actual or constructive knowledge of the alleged (rug) defect and failed to take corrective measures within a reasonable time\". See La. C.C.P. art. 966(D). See also Fontenot v. Patterson Ins. , 2009-0669 (La. 10/20/09), 23 So.3d 259, 268.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cassandra SMITH v. STATE of Louisiana, et al.
    No. 2019-C-0225
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 8, 2019
    ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT, PARISH OF ORLEANS
    CRICHTON, J., would grant and assigns reasons:
   In this trip and fall case I would grant and docket the writ application of State of Louisiana/Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) to examine whether the plaintiff has presented sufficient factual support to establish the existence of a genuine issue of material fact: whether DOTD "had actual or constructive knowledge of the alleged (rug) defect and failed to take corrective measures within a reasonable time". See La. C.C.P. art. 966(D). See also Fontenot v. Patterson Ins. , 2009-0669 (La. 10/20/09), 23 So.3d 259, 268.