Case ID: ny_171/html/0676-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary T. Bates, Respondent, v. Bernhard J. Ludwig et al., Appellants.
    
      Bates v. Ludwig, 62 App. Div. 617, affirmed.
    (Argued May 14, 1902;
    decided June 17, 1902.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 21, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying- a motion for a new trial.
    
      Louis Marshall, Samuel H. Guggenheimer and William Strauss for appellants.
    
      Harold Nathan and Edgar M. Leventritt for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of Howard v. Ludwig (171 N. Y. 507); no opinion.

Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.