Case ID: so2d_412/html/0030-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bruce RECARDO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 81-1606.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 2, 1982.
    Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and Gregory E. Like, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.
    
      Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s probation was revoked for failure to pay court costs and costs of probation- supervision. This was improper because there was no evidence from which the court could find that appellant had the financial ability to pay such costs. Coxon v. State, 365 So.2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new hearing on the question of appellant’s ability to pay.

GRIMES, A. C. J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.