Case ID: us_154/html/0555-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Swayne", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES v. COOK.
    CERTIFICATE OF DIVISION OF OPINION FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO.
    No. 102.
    Argued February 12 and 13, 1868.
    Decided February 24, 1868.
    
      United States v. Hartwell, 6 Wall. 385, followed.
    The indictment in this case is sufficient.
    The case is stated in the opinion.
   Mr. Justice Swayne

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case was certified up to this court from the Circuit Court of the United States for'the Southern District of Ohio, — the opinions of the judges of that court being opposed upon the points set forth in the certificate.

The first and third questions presented for our consideration are fully met by the opinion just delivered in the case of The United States v. Hartwell, 6 Wall. 385.

In accordance with that opinion they will be answered in the affirmative.

The second question relates to the sufficiency of the indictment in the particulars mentioned. We are of opinion that the indictment is sufficient: We deem this proposition so plain that any discussion of the subject is unnecessary.

Mr. Attorney General and Mr. J. Hubley Ashton for plaintiff.

Mr. H. Hunter for defendant.

This question will be answered accordingly.

The record shows that there is no foundation for the fourth question. It does not arise upon the indictment, and was abandoned by the defendant’s counsel in the argument at the bar.

This question, therefore, needs no answer.