Case ID: nys_125/html/1122-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. INGRAHAM, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GOSLIN v. MAGHER.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    December 2, 1910.)
    Appeal from Trial Term, New York County. Action by Una Goslin against Annie Irene Magher. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Judgment affirmed.
    Irving L. Ernst, for appellant. Edwin T. Taliaferro, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

INGRAHAM, P. J.

(dissenting). I think the verdict_ was without evidence to support it, as the evidence entirely fails to show that the defendant at any time enticed or induced the plaintiff’s husband to abandon her, or was the procuring cause of the abandonment, or of the interruption of the marital relations between the husband and wife. Buchanan v. Foster, 23 App. Div. 542, 48 N. Y. Supp. 732; Hanor v. Housel, 128 App. Div. 801, 113 N. Y. Supp. 163. I also think the verdict was excessive, and cannot be sustained for the amount that the jury awarded. I therefore dissent.

CLARKE, J., concurs.