Case ID: sw3d_532/html/0203-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dennis R. NASH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 104604
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: August 22, 2017
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied October 23, 2017
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Sri-kant Chigurupati, 1010 Market Street, St. Louis, MO 63101.
    ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Christine K. Lesicko, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.
    Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Sherri B. Sullivan and Kurt S. Odenwald, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Nash appeals the judgment of the motion court dismissing his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motions to file “exhibits” out of time, taken with this ease, are denied. The findings of the motion court were not clearly erroneous, and we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).