Case ID: f-appx_174/html/0162-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Khruawan SAEVOON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Donald E. POWELL, Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 05-1468.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 30, 2006.
    Decided: April 5, 2006.
    E. Ned Sloan, Sloan & Associates, P.C., Washington, D.C.; S. Howard Woodson, III, Law Offices of S.H. Woodson, III, PC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Rachel C. Ballow, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appel-lee.
    Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Khruawan Saevoon appeals a district court order granting summary judgment to the FDIC on her claim of failure to promote based on gender, race, and national origin discrimination pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, see 41 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000, et seq. (West 2000 & Supp.2005) (Title VII). Saevoon was employed as a computer specialist with the FDIC. The district court held that Saevoon’s discrimination claims failed because she had not shown that the nondiscriminatory reasons given by the FDIC for not promoting her were pretextual.

After reviewing the parties’ briefs and the applicable law, we conclude that the district court correctly decided the issues before it. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Sae-voon v. Powell, No. CA-04-765-1 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 31, 2005 & entered Apr. 6, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED