Case ID: nys_140/html/1124-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HOOCK et al. v. WELCH.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    March 28, 1913.)
    Action by Harry F. Hoock and another, as administrators with the will annexed of Catherine Schlotzer, deceased, against Mary L. Welch.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment directed in favor of the plaintiffs upon the submission, without costs, requiring the defendant to accept a deed of the property described in the submission and pay over the balance of the purchase price. The administrator with the wUl annexed had power to make the contract and sell and convey the property.