Case ID: so2d_596/html/1286-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. WARNER, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re the Marriage of Judith Maynard FORTUN, Appellant, v. Bryon P. FORTUN, Appellee.
    No. 91-2977.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    April 29, 1992.
    Judith C. Maynard, pro se.
    John E. Marke, Lake Worth, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We summarily affirm under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315.

LETTS and FARMER, JJ., concur.

WARNER, J., dissents with opinion.

WARNER, Judge,

dissenting.

There are several points raised in appellant’s brief, including visitation restrictions, failure to award alimony, and failure to make any equitable distribution of assets which raise meritorious points. Of course, an answer brief may convince us that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in these matters, but I cannot conclude that the brief itself is so non-meritorious as to justify the application of Rule 9.315, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.