Case ID: so2d_778/html/1065-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William D. HOPPER and Elaine Hopper, his wife, Appellants, v. Michelle R. RENO and Susanne Reno, Appellees.
    No. 4D99-1450.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Feb. 28, 2001.
    Rehearing Denied March 28, 2001.
    Millard C. Glancy of Law Office of Millard C. Glancy, Coral Springs, for appellants.
    David P. Pakula of Fazio, Dawson, Di-Salvo, Cannon, Abers, Podrecca & Fazio, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

As the jury found the accident at issue was not a legal cause of appellant’s injury, the error, if any, in the jury instructions regarding the amount of damages was harmless. See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1999). The denial of the motion to amend to allege property damages is also harmless because the property damages had already been paid. See id.

Affirmed.

WARNER, C.J., POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.