Case ID: sw3d_559/html/0059-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re the Marriage of: Gary GALLEBERG, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Kristen GALLEBERG, Appellant.
    No. ED 105879
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    Filed: September 11, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied October 15, 2018
    Samuel J. Hais, Clayton, MO, for appellant.
    Terry L. Jones, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Sarah S. Pleban, Guard Ad Litem.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM

In this consolidated case, mother, Kristen Schattgen Galleberg, and father, Gary Galleberg, appeal the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County dissolving their marriage, distributing the property and debt, and ordering maintenance, child support, and payment of the child's private-school tuition. The parties settled child-custody issues before trial. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the trial court's judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(1). 
      
      Father's motion to strike mother's cross-response and reply brief is denied. Mother's motion to strike father's reply brief is granted. Rule 84.04(i) states in relevant part that "[t]he respondent may file a reply brief in reply to appellant's response to the issues presented by respondent's appeal." In his reply brief, however, father again argues in opposition to mother's points on appeal rather than countering mother's responsive arguments to father's points on appeal.