Case ID: misc_8/html/0680-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George H. Meyers et al. Appellants, v. Lena Stix el al., Respondents.
    Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the City Court, affirming a judgment of the trial term of that court, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
    
      
      Charles Meyers, for appellants.
    
      Samuel W. Weiss, for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

We see little or no difference between the facts as presented on the former trial (reported 36 N. Y. St. Repr. 848) and upon this. On the former appeal we held that there was a trilateral agreement between the parties, and we see no reason to recede from that upon the facts presented in this. We think, therefore, this judgment is proper and should be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Bookstaver, Bischoff and Pryor, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.