Case ID: mj_10/html/0569-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES v. Airman First Class Stanley K. LONDON, FR [ XXX-XX-XXXX ] United States Air Force.
    ACM 22663 (recon).
    U. S. Air Force Court of Military Review.
    Sentence Adjudged 26 Nov. 1979.
    Decided 31 Oct. 1980.
    
      Appellate Counsel for the Accused: Colonel Larry G. Stephens and Captain Willard K. Lockwood.
    Appellate Counsel for the United States: Colonel James P. Porter and Captain Rich-ard O. Ely, II.
    Before EARLY, ARROWOOD and KASTL, Appellate Military Judges.
   DECISION UPON RECONSIDERATION

PER CURIAM:

In our original decision, United States v. London, 9 M.J. 905 (A.F.C.M.R.1980), we reassessed the sentence because of matters considered improperly by the convening authority in his review of the case. By motion, timely filed, the accused has requested that we reconsider the sentence we approved after reassessment. Noting that the motion is unopposed by appellate Government counsel, we grant the motion.

On the basis of the record as a whole, including the new matters submitted by appellate defense counsel in support of their motion, we modify our previous decision by approving only so much of the sentence as provides for a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for twelve months, forfeiture of $200.00 per month for nine months and reduction to airman.

The findings of guilty and the sentence, as further modified, are

AFFIRMED. 
      
       We note that the accused has been restored to duty.