Case ID: sw_151/html/1048-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DAYIDSON, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GERRON v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Dec. 11, 1912.)
    1. Criminal Law (§ 1090*) — Appeal—Record — Sufficiency.
    The sufficiency of the evidence to support a verdict and judgment cannot be reviewed, where the record contains no statement of facts or bills of exception.
    [Ed. Note. — Por other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2653, 2789, 2803-2827, 2927, 2928, 2948, 3204; Dec. Dig. §, 1090.*]
    2. Criminal Law (§ 1090*) — Appeal—Record— Sufficiency.
    Rulings on the admission of evidence cannot be reviewed, where the bills of exception thereto are not contained in the record.
    [Ed. Note. — Por other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2653, 2789, 2803-2827,2927, 2928, 2948, 3204; Dec. Dig. § 1090.*]
    Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; Barry Miller, Judge.
    Henry Gerron was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   DAYIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of burglary; his punishment being assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The grounds of the motion for new trial are based on the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and judgment, and two additional grounds allege that the court erred in excluding evidence and in admitting evidence as set out in bills of exception. The bills of exception are not in the record.

The judgment is affirmed.