Case ID: ga-app_32/html/0746-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

15284.
    Clark v. Athens Railway & Electric Co.
    Decided October 7, 1924.
    Action for damages; from Clarke superior court — Judge Fort-son. December 1, 1923.
    
      Horace & Frank Holden, Stephen G. Upson, for plaintiff.
    
      John J. Strickland, Erwin, Erwin & Nix, for defendant.
   Bloodworth, J.

1. When all the facts are considered and the excerpts from the charge, of which complaint is made, are read in connection with the remainder of the charge, there is no error in any of them that requires the grant of a new trial.

2. There is ample evidence to support the finding of the jury, and the judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed,.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.