Case ID: so2d_195/html/0635-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James RILEY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 7264.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
    March 1, 1967.
    Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, and Carleton L. Weidemeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.
    Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed under the authority of Hinton v. State, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 522; Savage v. State, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 566; Stacey v. State, Fla.App.1964, 165 So.2d 222; and Dias v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 766.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A

ALLEN, C. J., and PIERCE and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.