Case ID: ad2d_304/html/0551-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alex Scialpi, Respondent, v Island Right Homes, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.
    [757 NYS2d 334]
   In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Island Right Homes, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler J.), dated February 25, 2002, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant landlord did not establish its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment. There are triable issues of fact with respect to whether it created a dangerous condition by improperly installing a handrail on the subject premises (see Spencer v Geiger, 269 AD2d 522, 523 [2000]). In any event, even if the landlord did not create the allegedly defective condition, there are triable issues of fact with respect to whether the landlord had notice that the handrail was defective and, if so, whether the landlord was obligated to repair the defect (see Stalter v Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 220 AD2d 577, 578 [1995]; cf. Ross v Lyndhurst, 290 AD2d 432, 433-434 [2002]). The landlord’s failure to sustain its burden required the denial of the motion, regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Altman, J.P., Smith, McGinity and Crane, JJ., concur.