Case ID: wis_228/html/0525-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Rosenberry, C. J. Rosenberry, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kalb and another, Appellants, vs. Feuerstein and wife, Respondents.
    
      April 12
    
    June 29, 1938.
    
    
      /. /. McManamy of Madison, for the appellants.
    For the respondents there was a brief by Moran & O’Brien of Delavan, and oral argument by /. Arthur Moran.
    
   The following opinion was filed May 17, 1938:

Rosenberry, C. J.

The question sought to be raised in this case is the same question dealt with in a companion case, Kalb v. Luce, ante, p. 519, 279 N. W. 685, 280 N. W. 725, and for the reasons there stated the order sustaining the demurrer to the complaint should be affirmed.

By the Court. — The order appealed from is affirmed.

The following memorandum was filed June 29, 1938:

Rosenberry, C. J.

(on motion for rehearing). The memorandum in No. 105, Kalb v. Luce, ante, p. 519, 279 N. W. 685, 280 N. W. 725, covers both cases, and for the reasons stated in No. 105, the motion for rehearing is denied.

By the Court. — Motion for rehearing is denied without costs.