Case ID: sw3d_202/html/0058-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Erik Wayne CASE, Appellant.
    No. WD 65703.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Sept. 29, 2006.
    
      Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before: HOWARD, C.J., ELLIS and HARDWICK, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Erik Case appeals from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance and ten-year prison sentence. He contends the trial court erred in admitting testimony regarding the typical amount of marijuana a user would possess. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the conviction.

The parties have been provided with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).