Case ID: f-appx_50/html/0631-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

De’Shon PITT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE; T. Yates; Betty Davis; B.J. Ravizee, Grievance Coordinator; Awo Harvey, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 02-7127.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 7, 2002.
    Decided Nov. 14, 2002.
    De’shon Pitt, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

De’shon Pitt appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). Because Pitt may cure any deficiency by filing an amended complaint, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, because the judgment is not a final, appealable order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.