Case ID: so3d_73/html/0339-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Manuel J. CRIOLLO, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, Appellee.
    No. 1D11-2182.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Oct. 31, 2011.
    John Strohsahl and Bradford J. Beilly of Bradford J. Beilly, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, for Petitioner.
    Garnett W. Chisenhall, Chief Appellate Counsel, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellee’s confession of error, the final order is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to enter a new order which either accepts the penalty recommendation of the Administrative Law Judge or reimposes the increased penalty stating with particularity the reasons for increasing the penalty as required by section 120.57(1)(l), Florida Statutes (2010). See Shah v. Dep’t of Health, 804 So.2d 615 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK, and ROWE, JJ., concur.