Case ID: f-appx_695/html/0072-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Samuel D. KELKER, Petitioner-Appellant v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee
    No. 17-60061 Summary Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Filed August 10, 2017
    Samuel D. Kelker, Pro Se
    Robert Joel Branman, Esq., David A. Hubbert, Thomas J. Clark, Supervisory Attorney,U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division, Appellate Section, Washington, DC, William M. Paul, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee
    Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The order of the Tax Court is affirmed because all of the procedures have been followed to sustain the notice of determination and the collection due process hearing. The taxpayer Petitioner has had full opportunity to present any objection or evidence on his behalf. The Commissioner was entitled then to move for summary judgment by the Tax Court.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.