Case ID: so2d_539/html/1180-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Armando AMADOR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 88-267.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 21, 1989.
    Donald L. Ferguson, Coconut Grove, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Jacqueline M. Valdespino, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL and BASKIN, JJ., and JOSEPH P. McNULTY, Associate Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Benefield v. State, 160 So. 2d 706 (Fla.1964); State v. Maya, 529 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Duda, 437 So.2d 794 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Mathes v. State, 375 So.2d 1084 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 99 S.Ct. 421, 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978); Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978); Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 91 S.Ct. 2022, 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971); United States v. Garcia, 741 F.2d 363 (11th Cir.1984).