Case ID: ad2d_20/html/0954-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Albert J. Rusch, Respondent, v. Frank Karpick, Appellant.
   Judgment and order and judgment of City Court of Buffalo unanimously reversed on the law, without costs of this appeal to either party, and complaint dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Coneededly, the recovery in this action is based upon the negligent operation of a municipally owned vehicle by an employee of the City of Buffalo, who, at the time of the accident, was acting in the performance of his duties and within the scope of his employment. Although the City of Buffalo was not made a party to the action, it was also conceded that if sued it would toe responsible to plaintiff. Section 50-b of the General Municipal Law imposes upon the City of Buffalo ultimate liability for any recovery against this defendant; consequently service of a notice of claim upon the city as required by section 50-e of the General Municipal Law is a condition precedent to the prosecution and maintenance of this action. Since no such notice was served the complaint must toe dismissed. (General Municipal Law § 50-c; Van Tassell v. Hill, 285 App. Div. 584; Feisthamel v. Roczen, 273 App. Div. 937.) (Appeal from judgment and order of Erie County Court affirming a judgment of City Court of Buffalo in favor of plaintiff in an automobile negligence action.) Present—■ Williams, P. J., Bastow, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.