Case ID: nc_186/html/0780-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cuexam:.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. F. FAULKNER v. C. C. CARPENTER.
    (Filed 5 December, 1923.)
    Appeal by defendant from Lyon, J., at May Term, 1923, of Meok-LENBURG.
    Civil action tried upon tbe following issues:
    “1. Was tbe plaintiff’s automobile injured by tbe negligence of tbe defendant, as alleged in tbe complaint? Answer: 'Yes/
    “2. Was tbe plaintiff, or person driving bis automobile, at tbe time of tbe collision, guilty of negligence wbicb caused or contributed 'to tbe injury to bis car, as alleged in tbe answer? Answer: No.’
    “3. Wbat damages, if any, is tbe plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: '$650.’ ”
    Judgment on tbe verdict in favor of tbe plaintiff. Defendant appeals, assigning errors.
    
      Frank H. Kennedy for plaintiff.
    
    
      J. F. Flowers for defendant.
    
   Pee Cuexam:.

We are constrained to believe and to conclude, from a careful perusal of tbe entire record, tbat tbis case has been tried substantially in accordance with tbe law bearing on tbe subject. No ruling or action on tbe part of tbe trial court bas been discovered by us wbicb we apprehend should be held for reversible error. Tbe verdict and judgment, therefore, will be upheld.

No error.