Case ID: nj_2/html/0304-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MARY SAINTSING, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. STEINBACH COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued May 16, 1949
    Decided May 23, 1949.
    
      Mr. George F. Lahey, Jr. {Messrs. Lahey <& Gocheler, attorneys) argued the cause for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Isidor Kalisch {Mr. Mortimer Wald, attorney) argued the cause for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Jacobs in the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

For affirmance—Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Case, Heher, Oliphant, Waoheneeld, Burling and Ackerson—7.

For reversal—None.