Case ID: nj-eq_119/html/0387-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Phillipsburg National Bank and Trust Company, complainant-respondent, v. William Y. Rush and Bertha A. Rush, his wife, and Ridgway & Pfeffer, Incorporated, defendants-appellants.
    [Argued October term, 1935.
    Decided January 31st, 1936.]
    
      
      Messrs. Wall, Haight, Carey & Hartpence, for the defendants-appellants William Y. Rush et ux.
    
      Mr. Clarence Walters, for the complainant-respondent.
   Per Curiam.

From an examination of the record in this case, we are satisfied that the conclusions of the vice-chancellor are supported by the proofs.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 12.

For reversal—None.