Case ID: f-appx_415/html/0478-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Matthew BOROWSKI; Carianne Borowski, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Teresa POLINSKE, in her official and individual capacities; Steven D. Ep-ple, in his official and individual capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 10-2107.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 18, 2011.
    Decided: March 9, 2011.
    Matthew Borowski, Carianne Borowski, Appellants Pro Se. Alexander Francuzen-ko, Cook, Kitts & Francuzenko, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    
      Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Matthew and Carianne Borowski appeal a district court’s order granting Detective Stephen D. Epple’s and Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Teresa Polinske’s motions to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Borowski v. Polinske, No. 1:10-cv-00197-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 24, 2010; entered Aug. 25, 2010). We deny the Borowskis’ motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.