Case ID: so2d_229/html/0892-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph A. PEEL, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 69-514.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
    Jan. 9, 1970.
    Joseph A. Peel, Jr., in pro. per.
    Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See this court’s opinion at 210 So.2d 14. In addition, this is the second motion for similar relief and as noted in the trial judge’s order there has been no new ground set forth by appellant. CrPR 1.850, 3 F.S.A. expressly provides that the sentencing court shall not be required to entertain a second or successive motion for similar relief on behalf of the same prisoner.

LILES, Acting C. J., and MANN and McNULTY, JJ., concur.