Case ID: so2d_657/html/1288-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas MEDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 94-2075.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Aug. 2, 1995.
    Michael Dubiner of Dubiner & Blumberg, P.A., Boynton Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ettie Feistmann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   OPINION ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We withdraw our previous per curiam af-firmance and substitute the following opinion.

The state concedes having stipulated that the defendant should be permitted to withdraw his plea of guilty to the violation of probation. Thus, the undisputed evidence that the state breached its stipulation to allow appellant to vacate his plea to the probation violation requires reversal of the denial of defendant’s 3.850 motion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER, C.J., and STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.