Case ID: nj-super_98/html/0321-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DONALD L. SCOTT AND THEODORE DUNN, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. TOWN OF BLOOMFIELD, RALPH G. CONTE AND H. JOSEPH NORTH, DEFENDANTS, AND BOYS’ CLUB OF BLOOMFIELD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
    Argued December 11, 1967
    Decided December 21, 1967.
    
      Before Judges Sullivan, Eoley and Leonard.
    
      Mr. Paul Alongi for appellant (Messrs. Marin ello, Henkel, Soriano & Klein, attorneys).
    
      Mr. David C. Thompson for respondents (Messrs. Joyce & Brown, attorneys).
    
      Mr. Mias Abelson, Deputy Attorney General, for State of New Jersey, intervenor, (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of Hew Jersey, attorney).
   Pee Curiam.

The Town of Bloomfield, pursuant to a resolution and under the authority of N. J. 8. A. 40:60-45.3, leased certain municipal property for a period of 99 years at a rental of $1 per year to defendant Boys’ Club of Bloomfield. Plaintiffs, taxpayers of the municipality, instituted an action in lieu of prerogative writs challenging the validity of this lease. The trial court entered summary judgment declaring the resolution and lease void. 94 N. J. Super. 592. Defendant Boys’ Club now appeals.

The trial court’s action was based, inter alia, upon the determination that the statutory provision authorizing the lease was a special law that was unconstitutional because the appropriate pre-enactment public notification (R. 8. 1:6-1) required by Art. IY, § 7, par. 8 of our State Constitution had not been given.

We agree and therefore affirm. However, we limit our affirmance to the above determination.