Case ID: njl_109/html/0347-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FRANK M. SPRAGUE, RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH A. PENROSE ET AL., APPELLANTS.
    Argued May 18, 1932 —
    Decided October 17, 1932.
    For the respondent, Geran, Matlack & Laulman.
    
    For the appellants, Walter Carson.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Tbenchabd, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Bbogan, Van Busiciek, Kays, Deab, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.