Case ID: ny_222/html/0707-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gilbert Mautz, Respondent, v. Consolidated Rendering Company et al., Appellants.
    
      Mautz v. Consolidated Rendering Co., 170 App. Div. 938, affirmed.
    (Argued January 29, 1918;
    decided February 12, 1918.)
    Appeal from a judgment .of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 10, 1915, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee. This action was brought by plaintiff, the owner of three farms described in the complaint, to restrain the defendants from the continuance of certain alleged acts, which the plaintiff claimed resulted in polluting the waters of Headson’s creek, so that the same became unfit for domestic and dairy purposes. The judgment enjoined and restrained defendants from discharging, directly or indirectly, into Headson’s creek, any foul, impure, injurious or deleterious matter which will pollute, contaminate or infect the waters of said creek so as to render them unfit for use by the plaintiff for his milch cows or for other domestic purposes, and also granted damages.
    
      William H. Harding for Consolidated Rendering Company, appellant.
    
      James F. Ray for Village of East Syracuse, appellant.
    
      Leonard T. Haight for T. N. Benedict Manufacturing Company, appellant.
    
      George F. Park for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.