Case ID: f-appx_300/html/0245-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Pamela L. BANKS, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 08-7074.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 28, 2008.
    Decided: Nov. 17, 2008.
    Pamela L. Banks, Appellant Pro Se. William David Muhr, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Pamela L. Banks appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to reduce her sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Banks, No. 2:05-cr00131-RAJ-FBS-2 (E.D.Va. May 13, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.