Case ID: njl_104/html/0163-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DANIEL ALLEN, APPELLANT, v. C. FRANKLIN WILSON, JUDGE, ETC., RESPONDENT.
    Argued May 17, 1927
    Decided October 17, 1927.
    For the appellant, Elmer 17. Bornine.
    
    For the respondent, Charles A. Bathbun.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Kone.