Case ID: so2d_353/html/0966-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John Franklin HICKMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 77-1221.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Jan. 13, 1978.
    Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, and Paul C. Helm, Asst. Public Defender, Bar-tow, for appellant.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed. We agree, however, with appellant that there is an imperfection in his sentence. The phrase “at hard labor” is improper. Brooks v. State, 349 So.2d 794 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Accordingly we remand this ease for correction of the sentence. Appellant need not be present at resentencing.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.