Case ID: ohio-st-3d_94/html/0038-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Alice Robie Resnick, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State ex rel. Gauvey, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as State ex rel. Gauvey v. Indus. Comm. (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 38.]
    (No. 01-1144
    Submitted November 13, 2001
    Decided January 9, 2002.)
   The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Lonas, McGonegal & Tsangeos and Terrance J. McGonegal, for appellant.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Keith D. Blosser, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

Roetzel & Andress, Douglas E. Spiker and Noel C. Shepard, for appellee Handy & Harmon Automotive Group, Inc.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Alice Robie Resnick, J.,

dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and grant relator the requested relief in accordance with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666.

Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.