Case ID: dc_2/html/0066-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "The Court", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Birch v. Gittings.
    If A replevies from B, who had replevied from A, the Court will quash the 2d re-plevin, and, upon a motion made for a return of the property in the first replevin, will order it to remain with the person who appears to have the right of possession, according to the Maryland law, of 1785, c. 80, § 14.
    BiRch replevied from Gittings, and Gittings from Birch.
   The Court

quashed the 2d replevin and ordered the possession to remain with Gittings, he having the right of possession when Birch replevied. See Maryland law, 1785, c. 80, <§> 14.