Case ID: f-appx_653/html/0082-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Supap KIRTSAENG, D/B/A bluechristine99, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 14-344-cv
    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    August 4, 2016
    
      For Plaintiff-Appellee: Paul M. Smith, Jenner & Block LLP, Washington, D.C., Matthew J. Oppenheim, Oppenheim + Zebrak, LLP, Washington, D.C.
    For Defendant-Appellee: AndRew D. SilveRMAn (E. Joshua Rosenkranz, Annette L. Hurst, Lisa T. Simpson, on the brief), Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, New York
    Present: ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Chief Judge, JOHN M. WALKER, JR., DENNY CHIN, Circuit Judges.
   SUMMARY ORDER

After our decision in John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Kirtsaeng, 605 Fed.Appx. 48, 49 (2d Cir. 2015), affirming the district court’s denial of attorney’s fees to prevailing defendant Supap Kirtsaeng, Kirtsaeng petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. The Supreme Court granted the writ of certiorari, vacated the decision of this Court, and remanded the case. See Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 579 U.S.-, 136 S.Ct. 1979, 195 L.Ed.2d 368 (2016).

'We now VACATE the judgment of the district court and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.