Case ID: ohio-st-3d_123/html/0146-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Jones, Appellant.
    [Cite as State v. Jones, 123 Ohio St.3d 146, 2009-Ohio-4689.]
    (No. 2009-0931
    Submitted August 11, 2009
    Decided September 15, 2009.)
    Julia R. Bates, Lucas County Prosecuting Attorney, and David F. Cooper, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
    Deborah Kovac Rump, for appellant.
   {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Harris, 122 Ohio St.3d 373, 2009-Ohio-3323, 911 N.E.2d 882, to the extent that the court of appeals held that robbery as defined in R.C. 2911.02(A)(2) and aggravated robbery as defined in R.C. 2911.01(A)(1) are not allied offenses of similar import. The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further consideration of the animus analysis consistent with State v. Harris.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.