Case ID: f-appx_174/html/0754-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Martha HUSER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 05-2027.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 3, 2006.
    Decided March 16, 2006.
    Martha Huser, Appellant Pro Se. Charles G. Aschmann, Jr., Aschmann & Aschmann, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appel-lee.
    Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Martha Huser appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her civil action alleging employment discrimination and denying her motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Huser v. Antonelli, No. CA-04-1452 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 3, 2005 & entered Aug. 5, 2005; filed Aug. 8, 2005 & entered Aug. 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.