Case ID: so2d_651/html/0825-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nancy PRENTICE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 94-552.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 15, 1995.
    Laurie D. Hall, Tavernier, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Sylvie Perez Posner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before HUBBART, COPE and GREEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Nancy Prentice appeals her conviction of being an employee of a gambling house in violation of sections 849.01 and 849.02, Florida Statutes (1993). We conclude that there was no error with regard to the Richardson hearing, and find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s determination that the requirements of paragraph 90.803(18)(e), Florida Statutes (1993), were met.

Affirmed. 
      
      
         Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla. 1971).