Case ID: nys_138/html/1126-12.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LOOMIS et al., Respondents, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    November 20, 1912.)
    Action by Leslie G. Loomis and another against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the words “Grand Street” in the bill of lading indicate-the address of the consignee, and the fact that there is a Grand Street- freight yard does 'not create an ambiguity sufficient to justify submitting to the jury the question of whether the words “Grand Street” were used to designate-such freight yard as a place of delivery.

KRUSE and ROBSON, JJ., dissent.