Case ID: ny_144/html/0628-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edwin T. Laidley, Appellant, v. Etta M. Laidley, Respondent.
    (Argued October 22, 1894;
    decided November 27, 1894.)
    ; Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supremé 'Court in the first judicial department, made May 7, 1894, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting a motion by defendant for counsel fee in an action for divorce.
    • • William 8. Bermet for appellant.
    
      W J. Groo for respondent.
   Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.