Case ID: sw3d_137/html/0548-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Don A. DAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 62709.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    July 6, 2004.
    Irene Earns, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
    Deborah Daniels, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before RONALD R. HOLLIGER, P.J., ROBERT G. ULRICH, and JAMES M. SMART, JR., JJ.
   Order

PER CURIAM.

Don Dailey appeals the denial of his pro se Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing based on the assertion that the motion court erred in not conducting a hearing to determine whether he had been abandoned by post-conviction counsel. We affirm by summary order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).