Case ID: f-appx_282/html/0496-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael O’GRADY, Appellant, v. Robert M.A. JOHNSON; Daniel Klint; Synthia O’Grady; Mort McBain; Thomas Finley; Scott Corbett, Appellees.
    No. 07-1091.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 6, 2008.
    Filed: June 26, 2008.
    Before BYE, M. SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Michael O’Grady appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint. Having carefully considered O’Grady’s arguments on appeal, and upon de novo review, we conclude that dismissal was proper. We agree with the district court that O’Grady either failed to state a claim with regard to his allegations related to child custody and child support enforcement, or failed to assert a basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. The pending motions are denied. 
      
      . The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jeanne J. Graham, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.