Case ID: f-appx_332/html/0605-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Edward BOLYARD, a.k.a. Hill, a.k.a. Hillbilly, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-15653
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Aug. 26, 2009.
    Susan Hollis Rothstein-Youakim, US Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Daniel Edward Bolyard, Pensacola, FL, pro se.
    Before BIRCH, HULL and HILL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Thomas Ostrander, appointed counsel for Daniel Edward Bolyard in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bolyard’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Bolyard’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED AS MOOT.