Case ID: sw3d_565/html/0253-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eddie STRONG, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 105928
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    Filed: January 8, 2019
    Mary S. Choi, 1010 Market St. Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.
    Daniel N. McPherson, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.
    Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Eddie Strong ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief and finding that Movant failed to demonstrate that his plea counsel was ineffective. Finding that Movant has failed to demonstrate that the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).