Case ID: a3d_193/html/0343-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joan P. GROVE, Petitioner v. PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, Respondent
    Joan P. Grove, Petitioner v. Port Authority of Allegheny County, Respondent
    No. 127 WAL 2018 No. 128 WAL 2018
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    August 31, 2018
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 31st day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Commonwealth Court misapprehend basic fundamentals of tort law by holding that the failure to give a per se negligence charge where the jury still found [Petitioner] to be negligent even without the benefit of such charge was somehow relevant to the apportionment of factual cause?