Case ID: sw3d_352/html/0679-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Quinton C. BENSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 96257.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Nov. 15, 2011.
    Brocea Smith, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before: CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Quinton C. Benson, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).