Case ID: f-appx_305/html/0055-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Randy L. THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ynez OLSHAUSEN; Mary Ellen McDonald; Peter Gorman; Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police; Charlotte-Mecklenburg; State of North Carolina, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 08-1769.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 10, 2008.
    Decided: Dec. 11, 2008.
    Randy L. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Weston Johnson, McGuirewoods, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Richard Harcourt Fulton, Sardar Mujeeb Shah-Khan, Office of the City Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Thomas J. Ziko, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Randy L. Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Olshausen, No. 3:07-cv-00130-GCM, 2008 WL 2468738 (W.D.N.C. filed June 16, 2008) & (entered June 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.