Case ID: cal_166/html/0779-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "THE COURT.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[Crim. No. 1784a.
    In Bank.
    September 30, 1913.]
    THE PEOPLE, Appellant, v. FRANK DUNLEAVY, Respondent. THE PEOPLE, Appellant, v. HENRY FREEDMAN, Respondent. THE PEOPLE, Appellant, v. A. JOHNSON, Respondent. THE PEOPLE, Appellant, v. JOSEPH SMITH, Respondent.
    [Crim. No. 1784b.
    In Bank.
    September 30, 1913.]
    [Crim. No. 1784c.
    In Bank.
    September 30, 1913.]
    [Crim. No. 1784d.
    In Bank.
    September 30, 1913.]
    Criminal Law—Gambling by Pool-selling, etc.—Joinder of Offenses.—Judgments affirmed on the authority of People v. Plath, ante, p. 227.
    APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George H. Cabaniss, Judge.
    The facts are similar to those stated in People v. Plath, ante, p. 227.
    U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and John H. Riordan, Deputy Attorney-General, for Appellant.
    Harry E. Michael, Herbert Choynski, and James Raleigh Kelly, for Respondents.
   THE COURT.

Each of the appeals in the above entitled causes presents the same questions that are presented in People v. Plath, (Crim. No. 1784), ante, p. 227, [135 Pac. 954.] Upon the authority of the last named case, the action of the trial court in each of the above entitled eases must be affirmed.

The judgments appealed from are affirmed.