Case ID: f-appx_696/html/0631-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bismark Kwaku TORKORNOO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nina HELWIG, Esq.; John C. Monahan, Esq.; Mary Torkornoo; Jacqueline Emanga Ngole, Esq., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 17-1674
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: August 17, 2017
    Decided: August 25, 2017
    Bismark Kwaku Torkornoo, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bismark Kwaku Torkornoo seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part his motion to enforce this Court’s judgment and mandate. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Torkornoo seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with' oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED