Case ID: nd_72/html/0027-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam. Burr, Ch. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[File. No. 6786.]
    HAROLD D. ARNOLD, Respondent, v. CASS COUNTY, NORTH DAKOTA, a Public Corporation, Appellant.
    (4 NW(2d) 224.)
    Opinion filed May 26, 1942.
    
      Ralph F. Croal, State’s Attorney, and Roy K. Redetzke, Assistant State’s Attorney, for appellaxxt.
    
      Nilles, Oehlert & Nilles, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

This case involves precisely the same questions as those which were presented and determined in Re Peschel, ante, 14, 4 NW (2d) 194, and on the authority of the decision in that case the judgment appealed from in this case is affirmed.

Christianson, Morris, Burke, and Nuessle, JJ., concur.

Burr, Ch. J.

(dissenting). I dissent on grounds stated in the Peschel Case.