Case ID: sw3d_509/html/0153-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gary K. GRANDBERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    WD 79356
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    ORDER FILED: January 31, 2017
    Laura G. Martin, District Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant,
    Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.
    
      Before Division IV: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Chief Judge, and Thomas H. Newton and James Edward Welsh, Judges
   Order

Per Curiam:

Mr. Gary Grandberry appeals the Circuit Court of Jackson County’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion, which was based on claims that his plea counsel provided ineffective legal assistance and coerced him into accepting a plea offer from the State. There being no prece-dential value in our ruling, we have instead provided the parties a legal memorandum explaining our ruling. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).