Case ID: njl_103/html/0206-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. GEORGE OLIVER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted May 28, 1926
    Decided October 18, 1926.
    On error to'the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N. J. Mis. R. 1018.
    For the plaintiff in error, David F. Barkman.
    
    For the defendant in error, Albert H. Holland.
    
   Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.