Case ID: f-appx_112/html/0312-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Donald E. LAWTON, Plaintiff-ppellant, v. Deputy FLYNT, Grievance; Sergeant Hall; Lieutenant Chaplin; Major Pinson; Kathy McDougal, Grievance; Sheriff Arthur, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 04-7515.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 4, 2004.
    Decided: Nov. 10, 2004.
    
      Donald Lawton, Appellant pro se.
    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Donald E. Lawton appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lawton v. Flynt, No. CA-03-734-3 (E.D.Va. Sept. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED