Case ID: sw2d_807/html/0203-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MERCANTILE BANK, N.A., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Elbert A. WALTON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 58311.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    April 16, 1991.
    Elbert A. Walton, Jr., St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.
    Kathy Vann Quinerly, Joan Kay McMul-len, St. Louis, for plaintiff-respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Elbert A. Walton, Jr., appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, Mercantile Bank, N.A., f/k/a Mercantile Trust Company, N.A., on an action for the balance due on a promissory note. We have reviewed the record on appeal and find that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and that plaintiff-bank was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Rule 74.04(c). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).