Case ID: so2d_379/html/1064-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Louisiana v. Andrew MOODY.
    No. 65497.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Jan. 28, 1980.
    Rehearing Denied March 3, 1980.
    Alex Rubenstein, Gamm, Greenberg & Kaplan, Shreveport, for defendant-appel- • lant.
    William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Paul J. Car-mouche, Dist. Atty., Dale G. Cox, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Having reviewed all the assignments of error filed by the defendant, we find that they present no reversible merit and do not require published explanation because they do not present any question of unsettled law. Therefore, these assignments are discussed in an unpublished, but publicly recorded, appendix to this opinion.

The defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.