Case ID: f2d_105/html/1016-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER^ CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

EMPLOYEES’ MUTUAL ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. ARMOUR & COMPANY, a Corporation, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
    Nos. 6762, 6769.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
    Oct. 10, 1938.
    Euclid Louis Taylor and J. Warren McCaffrey, both of Chicago, 111., for petitioners.
    Charles Fahy, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
    Before EVANS, SPARKS, MAJOR, and TREANOR, Circuit Judges.
   PER^ CURIAM.

Petitioners’ applications for an injunction pending the disposition of this appeal must be denied upon the authority of In the Matter of the Petition of the National Labor Relations Board for a Writ of Prohibition and for a Writ of Mandamus, decided by the Supreme Court May 31, 1938, 304 U.S. 486, 58 S.Ct. 1001, 82 L.Ed. 1482, and New York Handkerchief Mfg. Company v. National Labor Relations Board, 7 Cir., 97 F.2d 1010, decided by this court May 27, 1938. While the facts, and in some respects the issues are different, we are convinced that the Supreme Court decision is applicable and governs.

The order denying the applications for injunction will be entered.