Case ID: nys_123/html/1119-09.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HATTEN, Respondent, v. HYDE-McFARLIN CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    March 29, 1910.)
    Action by John Hatten against the Hyde-McFarlin Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

McLennan, P. j., and WILLIAMS, J., dissent, upon the ground that at the time of the accident the plaintiff was not engaged in the work of the defendant.