Case ID: njl_50/html/0175-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE STATE, EX REL. FRANCIS T. F. RANDOLPH, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. R. FRANK WOOD, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For opinion of Supreme Court, see 20 Vroom 85.
    For the plaintiff in error, A. H. Gangewer and Mark JR. Sooy.
    
    For the defendant in error, Alfred Flanders.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court in its opinion.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Dixon, Eeed, Scudder, Yan Syckel, Brown, Clement, McGregor, Paterson, Whitaker. 10.

For reversal — None.