Case ID: ny_147/html/0721-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary Hennessy, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn City Railroad Company, Appellant.
    Reported below, 73 Hun, 569.
    (Argued November 1, 1895;
    decided November 26, 1895.)
    Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made December 1, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plain tiff entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
    
      Matthew Male for appellant.
    
      James O. Church for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

All concur, except Gray and Haight, JJ., not sitting.