Case ID: f-appx_326/html/0234-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Mujaddid Rahim MUHAMMAD, f/k/a Stacey Lamar Marsh, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 08-8176.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 28, 2009.
    Decided: June 3, 2009.
    Mujaddid Rahim Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mujaddid Rahim Muhammad appeals the district court’s order granting his motion to reduce his sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and the order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Muhammad, No. 3:91-cr00114-2 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 28, 2008; Sept. 24, 2008); see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009), petition for cert. filed, 77 U.S.L.W. 3559 (U.S. Mar. 20, 2009) (No. 08-1185). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.