Case ID: so2d_656/html/0222-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rolando CAPPE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 94-999.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 31, 1995.
    Rehearing Denied July 12, 1995.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marisa Tinkler Mendez, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Douglas J. Glaid, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
    Before HUBBART, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Rolando Cappe appeals his convictions for first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit first-degree murder, shooting into a vehicle, and unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense. We conclude that the evidence was legally sufficient and that no evidentiary error was committed. See De Pena v. State, 20 Fla.L.Weekly D901, 652 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 3d DCA Apr. 12, 1995). We find no merit in the claim of jury selection error and the claim of improper closing argument.

Affirmed.