Case ID: ga_76/html/0101-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Blandford, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Byne vs. Smith.
    1. Looking at the whole charge, there was no error in it; it was a full and fair submission of the law covering the facts in the case, and the refusals to charge complained of were substantially covered by the charge given.
    2. The evidence was conflicting, and there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence.
    Judgment affirmed.
    November 3, 1885.
   Blandford, Justice.