Case ID: so2d_845/html/0294-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hiawatha QUAINTANCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D02-2974.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    May 15, 2003.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and Gary D. Wimsett, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Charlie Crist, Attorney General and Kenneth D. Pratt, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We reverse Appellant’s conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine and remand for a new trial. Appellant was tried for possession of cocaine on January 13, 2002. For any offense occurring prior to May 13, 2002, an essential element of the crime of possession of an illegal substance was knowledge of the illicit nature of the substance.

At trial, Appellant testified and denied possession of any drugs or knowledge that cocaine was present. This denial placed at issue all elements of the offense, including knowledge of the illicit nature of the substance. Failure to instruct the jury on the element of knowledge of the illicit nature of the substance in his possession was reversible error. See Goodman v. State, 839 So.2d 902 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Scott v. State, 808 So.2d 166 (Fla.2002); Chicone v. State, 684 So.2d 736 (Fla.1996).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAVIS, LEWIS, and HAWKES, JJ„ Concur.