Case ID: dc_1/html/0399-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "The CouRT", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ramsay v. Riddle & Thornton.
    The Court will not enjoin what, may or may not he nuisance.
    Motion to dissolve an injunction to restrain the converting a wooden warehouse into a bakehouse.
    
      Mr. F. L. Lee, and Mr. G. Lee, for the plaintiffs,
    in support of the injunction, cited 1 Fonb. 29; Amb. 159; 2 Yes. 452 ; Amb. 209; 2 Bro. C. C. 64; Milford, 103, 107; 3 Inst. 201; 3 Bl. Com. 216 ; Ld. Raym. 486; Wood’s Inst. 538 ; Cro. Car. 366; 2 Shower, 327; Strange, 1167; 12 Mod. 342; 16 Vin. 23.
    
      Mr. E. J. Lee, and Mr. Sivann, contra,
    
    cited 4 Bl. Com. 168; 1 Hawk. c. 75, % 12; 3 Bl. Com. 219; Id. 5; 1 Hawk. c. 75; 3 Atk. 21; 12 Mod. 510 ; 3 Atk. 750 ; 1 Fonb. 21, 29, 30; 4 Bro. C. C. 165; 2 Ves. Jr. 42; 16 Vin. 23; 2 Har. Ch. 237.
    
      Mr. Tones, for the plaintiffs,
    cited Fran. Max. 30 ; 1 Burr. 334; 6 Mod. 145; Bac. Ab. tit. Nuisance.
    The injunction was dissolved without costs, (nem. con.)
    
   The CouRT

said, if the house in fitting up, should not be well secured against danger from fire, it might be the ground of an injunction to prevent the use of it as a bakehouse.