Case ID: ad3d_101/html/0484-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Roxroy R., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.
    [954 NYS2d 869]
   The disposition was the least restrictive dispositional alternative consistent with appellant’s needs and the community’s need for protection, and was a proper exercise of discretion (see Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947 [1984]). The underlying incident was serious and violent, and the length and conditions of probation were not unduly punitive. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Acosta and Román, JJ.