Case ID: f-appx_668/html/0287-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald WALTERS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-10298
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted August 16, 2016 
    
    FILED August 22, 2016
    Elizabeth Olson White, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USRE — Office of the US Attorney-Reno, Reno, NV, Michael Anthony Humphreys, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Phillip Nelson Smith, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, USLV — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Donald Walters, Jr., Pro Se.
    Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Donald Walters, Jr., appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea convictions and 105-month concurrent sentences for being a felon in possession of firearms, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Walters’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Walters the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Walters’s motion for judicial notice and counsel’s motion to withdraw are GRANTED.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.