Case ID: nj-eq_100/html/0566-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Roderick D. Grant, appellant, v. Steenland Construction Company et al., respondents.
    [Decided January 31st, 1927.]
    On appeal from a decree of the conrt of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Baches, whose opinion is reported in 99 N. J. Eq. 82.
    
    
      Mr. Andrew J. Whinnery, for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. Morrison, Lloyd & Morrison, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the conrt below by Vice-Chancellor Baches.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Min-turn, KLalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 11. .

For reversal — None.