Case ID: ohio-st-2d_26/html/0157-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Vroman Ice Cream Co., Appellant, v. Porterfield, Tax Commr., Appellee.
    [Cite as Vroman Ice Cream Co. v. Porterfield (1971), 26 Ohio St. 2d 157.]
    (No. 70-676
    Decided May 26, 1971.)
    
      
      Messrs. Shatvaker & Smith and Mr. Charles J. Smith, for appellant.
    
      Mr. William J. Brown, attorney general, and Mr. Dwight C. Pettay, Jr., for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Appellant now seeks a review by this court of the decision below solely on a question of value, which is peculiarly a question of fact.

“It is not the function of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the Board of Tax Appeals on factual issues.” Citizens Financial Corp. v. Porterfield (1971), 25 Ohio St. 2d 53.

This court cannot find that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is unreasonable or unlawful, and it is, therefore, affirmed.

Decision affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Schneider, Herbert, Duncan, Corrigan, Stern and Leach, JJ., concur.