Case ID: ga-app_22/html/0450-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodwoeth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

9459.
    Putney v. Pass.
    Decided June 12, 1918.
    Rehearing denied August 2, 1918.
    Action for breach of contract; from Dougherty superior court— Judge Harrell. November 30, 1917.
    
      Pope & Bennet, for plaintiff in error.
    . B. J. Bacon, B. H. Ferrell, contra^
   Bloodwoeth, J.

Jhe grounds of the amendment to the motion for new trial are without merit. There is evidence sufficient to support the verdict, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.