Case ID: mich-app_11/html/0657-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ADAMS SHEET METAL CORPORATION v. CITY OF ROYAL OAK. CITY OF ROYAL OAK v. CLAIR DITCHY ASSOCIATES.
    Appeal and Error — Trial Court Findings.
    Findings of trial judge in third-party aetion for damages for negligence in maintenance of air conditioner held, not clearly erroneous on record presented (GCR 1963, 517.1).
    Reference for Points in Headnote
    5 Am Jur 2d, Appeal and Error § 839 et seq.
    
    Appeal from Oakland; Adams (Clark J.), J.
    Submitted Division 2 June 5, 1968, at Detroit.
    (Docket No. 3,946.)
    Decided June 10,1968.
    Complaint by Adams Sheet Metal Corporation, a Michigan corporation, against the City of Royal Oak, a municipal corporation, for costs of material and labor in replacement of air conditioner coils. Third-party complaint by City of Royal Oak against Clair Ditchy Associates, a partnership, for negligence in causing damage which necessitated repair. Judgment for principal plaintiff. Judgment of no cause of action in favor of third-party defendant. Third-party plaintiff City of Royal Oak appeals from judgment in favor of third-party defendant.
    Affirmed.
    
      Allan G. Eertler, for third-party plaintiff City of Royal Oak.
    
      Malcolm Eeber, for third-party defendant Clair Ditchy Associates.
   Per Curiam.

Third-party plaintiff appeals from a judgment of no cause of action in favor of third-party defendant entered by the trial court sitting without a jury on the basis that the alleged negligence of defendant had not been established.

A review of the trial record fails to establish that the findings of the trial judge which support his judgment are clearly erroneous. OCR 1963, 517.1.

Affirmed, with costs to third-party defendant.

Quinn, P. J., and Fitzgerald and J. H. G-illis, JJ., concurred.