Case ID: nj-eq_97/html/0371-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Isaac Coltinuk et ux., respondents, v. Lena Hockstein et ux., appellants.
    [Submitted October term, 1924.
    Decided January 19th, 1925.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Church, whose opinion is reported in 95 N. J. Eq. 513.
    
    
      Messrs. Dernbe & Dernbe and Mr. Maximilian T. Rosenberg, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. Carl T. Olson and Mr. Merritt Lane, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The bill of complaint in this case was filed to compel specific performance of a contract to convey real estate, located in the city of Bayonne.

Our reading of the record and a consideration of the briefs lead us to the same conclusion as that of the vice-chancellor, viz., a decree for specific performance should be ordered.

The decree of the court of chancery is therefore affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Min-turn, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Clark, McGlennon, JJ. 8.

For reversal—Parker, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Kays, JJ. 6.