Case ID: f-appx_386/html/0454-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In Re: Darrell Lamont BOSTICK, Petitioner.
    No. 10-1381.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 24, 2010.
    Decided: June 30, 2010.
    Darrell Lamont Bostick, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
   Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darrell Lamont Bostick petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for reconsideration. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied Bostick’s motion on April 8, 2010. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Bostick’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.