Case ID: sw3d_181/html/0259-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Larry Donnell CAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 64800.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Jan. 10, 2006.
    Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Presiding Judge, ROBERT G. ULRICH, Judge and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry Cain appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).