Case ID: so2d_627/html/1349-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Vincent WALSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-3630.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Dec. 29, 1993.
    
      Michael D. Gelety, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James T. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand for resentencing within the guidelines. See Smith v. State, 598 So.2d 1063 (Fla.1992); Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990). The appellant has also pointed out conflicting orders concerning credit for time served. Upon resentencing, this conflict should be resolved and the trial court should specify the dates of incarceration for which appellant is being credited.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and FARMER, JJ., concur.