Case ID: f-appx_618/html/0655-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jesse LOOR, individually, and as next friend for J.L. a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Saily PUENTE, Caridad Hermida, Lissette Tarrago, Officer J. Horovitz, # 7578, Metro Dade Police Department, Officer Rossi, #5731, Metro Dade Police Department, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 14-15431
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Oct. 7, 2015.
    Jesse Loor, individually, and as next friend for J.L. a Minor, Miami, FL, pro se.
    Metro West Detention Warden, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Before WILSON, JORDAN, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Jesse Loor, a state pretrial detainee proceeding informa pauperis, appeals pro se from the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). After considering Loor’s brief and conducting a de novo review of the record on appeal, we find that the issues and arguments Loor raises are unavailing. Since Loor is proceeding pro se, we liberally construe his pleadings; however, we may not rewrite Loor’s complaint. See Snow v. DirecTV, Inc., 450 F.3d 1314, 1320 (11th Cir.2006); Tannenbamn v. United States, 148 F.3d 1262, 1263 (11th Cir.1998) (per curiam). Loor failed to state a facially plausible claim for relief against any of the named defendants. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009); see also § 1915(e)(2)(B) (compelling dismissal when an in forma pauperis case fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted). Accordingly, Loor’s action was properly dismissed, and we affirm the district court.

AFFIRMED.