Case ID: njl_110/html/0564-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cdeiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MARY E. MUNSON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. H. Y. JOHNSON, J. A. NESBITT AND WILLIAM MILLER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
    Argued February 15, 1933
    Decided April 28, 1933.
    
      For the appellants, Samuel II. Nelson (Thomas L. Par-sonnet,, of counsel).
    For the respondent, Schneider •& Schneider (Jacob Schneider, on the brief).
   Pee Cdeiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Teen-chard, Parked, Lloyd, Case, Heiier, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.