Case ID: njl_83/html/0793-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

OTTO TISCHMAN, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted July 8, 1912
    Decided November 18, 1912.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 52 Vroom 268.
    For the plaintiff in error, Weller & Lichtenstein.
    
    For the defendant in error, Collins &■ Corbin.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reásons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenehard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Bergen, Yoorhees, Minturn, Kaltsoh, Bogert, Congdon, White, Teeacy, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.