Case ID: nj-eq_85/html/0209-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William A. Copeland et al., respondents, v. United Shoe Machinery Company et al., appellants.
    [Argued June 30th, 1915.
    Decided November 15th, 1915.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevens, whose opinion is' reported in 8Jf N. J. Eq. 276.
    
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Vredgnburgii, Heppenheimer, Taylor—11.

For reversal—None.