Case ID: so2d_623/html/1254-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DOREZ ELECTRONICS CORPORATION and Doris M. Anez, Appellants, v. FLEET CREDIT LEASING CORPORATION and Denrich Leasing Group, Appellees.
    No. 92-1938.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 5, 1993.
    Doris M. Anez, in pro. per.
    Hayt, Hayt & Landau and Virginia B. Chosed, Miami, for appellees.
    Before HUBBART, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.
   CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Appellees correctly concede that the trial court erred in granting final summary judgment against defendants. “A summary judgment should not be granted unless the facts are so crystallized that nothing remains but questions of law.” Moore v. Morris, 475 So.2d 666, 668 (Fla.1985). “If the existence of such issues or the possibility of their existence is reflected in the record, or the record raises even the slightest [reasonable] doubt in this respect, the judgment must be reversed.” Briadi Trading Co. v. Anthony R. Abraham Trading Enter., Inc., 469 So.2d 955, 956 (Fla. 3d DCA1985). The record in this case demonstrates that issues of fact exist. Thus, we reverse the final summary judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.