Case ID: ark_296/html/0503-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James Elgin WHITE v. STATE of Arkansas
    RC 88-37
    758 S.W.2d 705
    Supreme Court of Arkansas
    Opinion delivered October 10, 1988
    
      
      Wilson & Associates, P.A., by: Ronald C. Wilson, for appellant.
    No objection.
   Per Curiam.

It has been our practice when a record is presented, which has not been prepared by a certified court reporter, to not allow review unless two things are done. First, all parties agree the record is accurate. Second, the mistake will not be repeated.

The first condition has been satisfied. If the trial judge will write our clerk noting that in the future his regular certified court reporter will record all such juvenile cases in the future, we will accept the record.