Case ID: f_108/html/0990-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

POOLE v. SMITH et al.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    February 13, 1901.)
    No. 622.
    Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the District of Washington.
    Humes & Lysons and John E. Miller, for appellant.
    Edward Brady, Wilson It. Gay, and Burke, Shepard & MeGjlvra, for appellees.
   Appeal dismissed for failure to print record under rule 23 (31 C. C. A. clxiii., 90 Fed. clxiii.).