Case ID: sw2d_796/html/0117-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Wayne HEARN, Appellant.
    No. 57591.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Sept. 25, 1990.
    Beth A. Davis, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Brad Blake, Asst. Circuit Atty., St. Louis, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after sentencing in accord with jury verdicts on two class A. misdemeanor charges, assault in the third degree, § 565.070 RSMo 1986, and stealing under $150, § 570.030.1 RSMo 1986. We affirm. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only settling forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).