Case ID: ohio-st-3d_62/html/0227-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dayton Bar Association v. Wiechel.
    [Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Wiechel (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 227.]
    (No. 91-1255
    Submitted September 11, 1991
    Decided December 18, 1991.)
    
      
      Richard S. Sutton, for relator.
    
      David C. Greer, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We agree that respondent violated DR 6-101(A)(3) as found by the board. We also concur in the board’s recommendation and hereby publicly reprimand respondent. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.