Case ID: wash_2/html/0344-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Anders, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 99.
    Decided April 6, 1891.]
    Elisha P. Ferry et al. v. The County of King et al.
    
    
      Error to District Court, King County.
    
    
      Thomas Burke, and J. C. Haines, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Ronald & Piles, and W. S. Bush, for defendants in error.
   Anders, C. J.

— This action involves precisely the same questions presented in the case of Ferry v. King Co., ante, p. 337. The two causes were submitted together upon the printed briefs of counsel; and for the reasons given in the opinion in the former case, herewith filed, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Stiles, Dunbar, and Scott, JJ., concur.

Hoyt, J., not sitting.