Case ID: cal-unrep_3/html/0106-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "VANCLIFF, C. PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PURDY v. RAHL.
    No. 11,921;
    July 1, 1889.
    21 Pac. 971.
    Appeal—Failure to File Briefs.—Where appellant, long after the time granted by the court to file briefs, fails to file either briefs, points, or authorities, the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.
    APPEAL from Superior Court, Santa Clara County; F. E. Spencer, Judge.
    T. H. Laine for appellant; J. E. Richards for respondent.
   VANCLIFF, C.

On the twenty-fourth day of January, 1889, it was ordered by the court that in this cause appellant be allowed thirty days to file brief, respondent ten days to answer, and appellant five days to reply; and on the twenty-fifth day of March following the court ordered the submission of the cause. But no brief or points and authorities have been filed by either party. We therefore advise that the judgment and order appealed from be affirmed.

We concur: Foote, C.; Hayne, C.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.