Case ID: so2d_605/html/1326-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel EARLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 91-02915.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Oct. 14, 1992.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Brad Permar, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order revoking defendant’s community control. We also affirm defendant’s sentence upon revocation of probation of twenty years incarceration followed by a term of probation. See Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161, 164 (Fla.1988). We do not agree with defendant’s contention that at his original sentencing he had received a “true split sentence.” We con-elude instead that he had received straight probation.

However, because we agree with defendant’s contention that the record is ambiguous regarding the number of years probation to which defendant was sentenced upon revocation of probation, we remand this case to the trial court for clarification on that aspect.

LEHAN, C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.