Case ID: ad_268/html/0778-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kate Weissberger, Respondent, v. Harry Weissberger, Appellant.
   In an action by a wife for a separation, defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for permission to serve a supplemental answer in order to plead as a defense a judgment between the same parties in an earlier action. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The paper sought to be pleaded in the proposed supplemental answer is not a judgment but an order. We pass upon no other question in the ease. Close, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ., concur.