Case ID: ny-2d_59/html/1021-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, v Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Appellant.
    Decided July 7, 1983
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Norman H. Dachs for appellant.
    A. Paul Goldblum for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (93 AD2d 814). This being an action between carriers for a declaratory judgment as to the division of responsibility between them, the reasoning of Chrysler Leasing Corp. v Public Administrator, N. Y. County (85 AD2d 410) is not apposite.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.