Case ID: so2d_504/html/0493-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

W.R. GRACE AND COMPANY, Creative Food’N Fun Company, Appellants, v. MULTI RESTAURANT CONCEPTS, INC., Appellee.
    No. 86-3159.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 24, 1987.
    Rehearing Denied April 20, 1987.
    Therrel, Baisden & Meyer Weiss and Julian R. Benjamin, Miami Beach, for appellants.
    Thomson, Zeder, Bohrer, Werth & Ra-zook and Evan K. Kaplan, Miami, for appel-lee.
    Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Finding no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s ruling that enforcement of the contract would be unreasonable and unjust; that the forum designated in the contract was chosen because of the defendants’ overwhelming bargaining power; and that enforcement of the choice of forum clause would contravene the strong public policy of Texas, we affirm the trial court’s Order Denying Re-Stated Motion to Dismiss. Manrique v. Fabbri, 493 So.2d 437 (Fla.1986); Haws & Garrett General Contractors, Inc. v. Panhandle Custom Decorators & Supply, Inc., 500 So.2d 204 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

Affirmed.