Case ID: nj-eq_100/html/0560-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles R. Hedden Company, respondent, v. Walter J. Dozier, appellant.
    [Decided January 31st, 1927,]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, whose opinion is reported in 99 N. J. Eq. 543.
    
    
      Messrs. Lum, Tamblyn & Colyer, for the respondent.
    
      Messrs. McCarter & English, for the appellant.
   Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Tbenchaed, Mintuen, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaoh, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.