Case ID: so2d_333/html/0506-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William R. TEDDER, joined by his wife, Deborah Tedder, Appellants, v. CITY OF FORT PIERCE et al., Appellees.
    No. 75-2053.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 28, 1976.
    Rehearings Denied July 6, 29, 1976.
    Hubert R. Lindsey of Farish & Farish, West Palm Beach, for appellants.
    Marjorie D. Gadarian of Jones, Paine & Foster, West Palm Beach, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon review and consideration of the briefs and record on appeal we are of the opinion that plaintiffs’ cause of action against the individual employees of the City of Fort Pierce was not barred by the one year limitation applicable to cities and villages as prescribed in sec. 95.24, F.S. Insofar as those defendants other than the City of Fort Pierce are concerned the four year limitation period set forth in sec. 95.-11(4), F.S., is applicable. Accordingly, the order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint and the final judgment rendered thereon are affirmed insofar as it relates to the City of Fort Pierce, defendant, and reversed insofar as it relates to the individual defendant-employees of the City of Fort Pierce.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part.

WALDEN, C. J., and CROSS and MA-GER, JJ., concur.