Case ID: ad3d_148/html/0942-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eddy Cepeda, Appellant.
    [48 NYS3d 612]
   Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Koenderman, J.), dated April 15, 2013, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant’s contention that he was entitled to a downward departure from a level three sex offender status based upon the aggregate of certain factors is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Figueroa, 138 AD3d 708, 709 [2016]; People v Rosales, 133 AD3d 733, 733 [2015]; People v Fernandez, 91 AD3d 737, 738 [2012]). In any event, the defendant failed to demonstrate that there existed mitigating circumstances of a kind or to a degree not otherwise adequately taken into account by the guidelines that warranted a downward departure from his presumptive level three sex offender status (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 [2014]; People v Sanchez, 138 AD3d 946 [2016]; People v Azeez, 138 AD3d 945 [2016]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly designated the defendant a level three sex offender.

Mastro, J.P., Lev-enthal, Barros and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.