Case ID: f-appx_691/html/0727-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Troy L. PEARSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cecilia REYNOLDS, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 16-7464
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 23, 2017
    Decided: June 8, 2017
    Troy L. Pearson, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Troy L. Pearson seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his 28' U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The magistrate judge recommended dismissing the petition and advised Pearson that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Pearson waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED