Case ID: ny-sup-ct_81/html/0640-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Opening of One Hundred and Twenty-seventh Street (Claim of James A. Deering).
   Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. —

Per Curiam

The record upon which this appeal is heard shows beyond dispute that the relation of attorney and client between Peering and James Baird never existed, and as that relation is the necessary foundation for an attorney’s lien, it follows that the attorney has no lien upon the fund. The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

.Present — Yan Brunt, P. J., O’Brien and Follett, JJ.