Case ID: kan_74/html/0897-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State of Kansas v. William Frampton.
    No. 14,965.
    (87 Pac. 1150.)
    Appeal from Allen district court; Oscar Foust, judge.
    Opinion filed November 10, 1906.
    Affirmed.
    
      C. C. Coleman, attorney-general, and C. L. Evans, assistant attorney-general for Allen county, for The State; R. H. Bennett, of counsel.
    
      Ewing, Gard & Gard, for appellant.
   Per Curiam:

Defendant was convicted of two unlawful sales of intoxicating liquor, and also for maintaining a nuisance. By an election the- state designated the transactions upon which it would rely to establish the sales. The proof was sufficient to support the findings on both counts. A sale by defendant’s barkeeper, at defendant’s place of business, and in his presence, is strong proof of a sale by himself. According to the testimony. ,the witness .Kern bought liquor from the defendant directly, and ■ at other times he was served by those who were assisting in the sale of liquor in defendant’s place of business.

■" The judgment is affirmed.