Case ID: nj-eq_140/html/0107-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Andrew Stohl, Jr., respondent, v. Mary Stohl, &c., et al., appellants.
    [Submitted February 14th, 1947.
    Decided May 15th, 1947.]
    
      Mr. Earl T. Milsop (Mr. Mortimer L. Mahler, of counsel), for the appellants.
    
      Messrs. Feder >& Binder, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported at 138 N. J. Eq. 220.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Hehbr, Colie, Eastwood, Wells, Rafferty, MoGbehan, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Wachenfeld, Dill, Freund, McLean, JJ. 4.