Case ID: haw_65/html/0428-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, GENERAL MOTORS OVERSEAS DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees, and HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., HAWAIIAN TELEPHONE COMPANY, and CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, Defendants
    NO. 8354
    (CIVIL NO. 40518)
    NOVEMBER 5, 1982
    RICHARDSON, C.J., LUM, NAKAMURA, PADGETT AND HAYASHI, JJ.
   Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants in a suit between two joint tortfeasors where the plaintiff was found to be 5214% at fault and the defendants 4714% at fault. By entering judgment for the appellees, the court below held, in effect, that the Hawaii Comparative Negligence statute, § 663-31. HRS, governs this action and prevents appellant’s recovery since its fault, under the verdict, exceeded appellees’. We reverse.

We hold that § 663-31, HRS, does not affect an action between two joint tortfeasors under the Uniform Contribution Among Joint Tortfeasors Act, §§ 663-11 through 17, HRS.

Accordingly, the judgment below is reversed and remanded with instructions to enter a judgment in favor of the appellant in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Contribution Amongjoint Tortfeasors Act.

Jeffrey Y. Higashi (Wayne M. Sakai with him on the reply brief, Burke, Ashford, Sakai, McPheeters, Bordner id Gilardy of counsel) for appellant.

Joseph Schneider (Conklin, Schneider id Love of counsel) for appellees.

Reversed and remanded.