Case ID: mo_7/html/0292-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Napton, Judge.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rennick v. Walton.
    
      A verdict found upon conflicting testimony will not bo disturbed by tills, court.
    found u^on'st conflicting _ nof^distur-<-ourt this
    Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lafayette county.
    
    Burden for Appellant
    French & Sawyer for Appellee.
   Opinion of the Court, delivered by

Napton, Judge.

This was an action by petition in debt by William P. Walton against Andrew E. Rennick. Plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment for nine hundred and sixty-eight dollars and eighty six cents. Plaintiff remitted sixty-five dollars. After yprdict, the defendant moved for a new trial, because the court had admitted improper and illegal testi-and because the verdict was against the weight of testimony. It does not appear from the bill of exceptions that defendant objected to the testimony when it was °®'ere^> aQd a verdict found upon conflicting testimony will not be disturbed by this court.

Judgment affirmed.