Case ID: njl_65/html/0311-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOSEPH A. VAN MATER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. FIELDING G. LUCAS, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    Argued June 19, 1900
    Decided November 19, 1900.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    Eor the plaintiff in error, Alan II. Strong.
    
    Eor the defendant in error, Freeman Woodbridge.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment in this ease is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Dixon in the Supreme Court. 35 Vroom 182.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Yan Syckel, Garrison, Fort, Bogert, Hendrickson, Yreden-BURGI-I, YoORHEES. 9.

For reversal—None.