Case ID: f-appx_654/html/0129-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David J. LAUX; Tara K. Laux, a/k/a Tara K. Long, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA; James W. Patterson, Director, Fairfax County Department of Public Works and Environmental Services, Defendants-Appellees, and The Commonwealth of Virginia, Defendant.
    No. 16-1018
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 2, 2016
    Decided: June 10, 2016
    David J. Laux, Tara K. Laux, Appellants Pro Se. David P. Bobzien, County Attorney, Cynthia A. Bailey Deputy County Attorney, Christopher A. Costa, Sara G. Silverman, Assistant County Attorneys, Fairfax County Attorney’s Office, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before KING, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David J. Laux and Tara K. Laux appeal the district court’s order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and the contentions on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Laux v. Bd. Of Supervisors of Fairfax Cty. Va., No. 1:15-cv-01334-LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. Dec. 11, 2015); see Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923); Dist. of Columbia Ct. of App. v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.