Case ID: nj-eq_92/html/0236-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George D’Annunzio, respondent, v. Bridget D’Annunzio, appellant.
    [Decided October 21st, 1920.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson, whose opinion is reported in 91 N. J. Eq. 186.
    
    
      Mr. Anthony Boiti, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. Edward M. Salley, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbacii, White, PIeppeni-ieimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson—15.

For reversal—None.