Case ID: a2d_198/html/0909-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Guilford E. NARANJIT, Appellant, v. Amy NARANJIT, Appellee.
    No. 3387.
    Bistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals.
    Argued Feb. 24, 1964.
    Decided March 30, 1964.
    A. Lillian C. Kennedy, Washington, D. C., for appellant. Eugene A. Chase, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appellant.
    Jean F. Dwyer, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
    Before HOOD, Chief Judge, MYERS, Associate Judge, and CAYTON (Chief Judge, Retired).
   PER CURIAM.

This appeal by a husband stems from an •order of the trial court affirming custody ■of three minor children in the wife and increasing support payments by reason of a change in her financial situation since the .original order. The court also found the husband in contempt of the initial order of custody, but imposed no penalty.

Suffice it to say that the record amply supports the findings of the trial court on these issues and we find neither error nor abuse of discretion in the award of custody to the wife and increased support payments.

Affirmed.