Case ID: pa_619/html/0471-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

65 A.3d 293
    COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner, v. Charles Ray HICKS, Respondent.
    No. 740 MAL 2012.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    April 17, 2013.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of April, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Under what circumstances are rulings limiting or specifying which witnesses a party may call appropriate for consideration before trial under Pa.R.E. 403?