Case ID: so2d_512/html/1016-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Interest of P.A.P., J.P. and J.A.P., Each a Child. Jeanine Pyritz LUKACH, Appellant, v. James Andrew PYRITZ, Appellee.
    Nos. BO-174, BM-280.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Aug. 27, 1987.
    Michael J. Pugh of Mann, Lang, Staples & Pugh, Pensacola, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Joseph Lewis, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee/Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services.
    Charles J. Kahn and Richard E. Scher-ling of Levin, Warfield, Middlebrooks, Ma-bie, Thomas, Mayes & Mitchell, Pensacola, for appellee/Pyritz.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the dependency order appealed in Case No. BO-174. Such order superseded the earlier custody modification order which is the subject of the appeal in Case No. BM-280. Affirmance of the dependency order renders moot the appeal in BM-280. Accordingly, the appeal in the latter case is hereby dismissed.

ERVIN, NIMMONS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.