Case ID: sw_201/html/0400-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PHILLIPS, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ALTGELT v. GUTZEIT et al.
    (No. 2890.)
    (Supreme Court of Texas.
    March 13, 1918.)
    Statutes &wkey;>94(l) — Local and Special Acts —Road Laws — ‘ ‘Regulating Aeeaies oe County.”
    Const, art. 3, § 56, forbids the enactment of any local or special law regulating affairs of counties. Article 8, § 9, as amended, authorizes the Legislature to adopt a local law as to maintenance of public roads. Vernon’s Sayles’ Ann. Civ. St. 1914, art. 3870, provides that each county commissioner shall receive $3 for each day engaged in holding commissioners’ court. Article 6901 constitutes county commissioners supervisor's of public roads each to receive $3 per day for the time actually so employed. Loc. & Sp. Acts 33d Leg. c. 77, § 5, providing for a road system in Bexar county, requires each precinct county commissioner to supervise the roads in his precinct to perform all the a!cts required by the) court, and fixes a salary of $2,-400 per annum in lieu of all other fees and per diem allowances. Held, that such section of the act so far regulated the affairs of said county as to be unconstitutional as a local and special act.
    [Ed. Note. — For other definitions, see Words and Phrases, First and Second Series, Regulate.]
    Error to Court of Civil Appeals, Fourth Supreme Judicial District.
    Action for injunction by George C. Alt-gelt against Charles X. Gutzeit and others. To review a judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals (187 S. W. 220), affirming a judgment for defendants, plaintiff brings error.
    Judgments reversed, and cause remanded.
    E. P. Lipscomb and Geo. C. Altgelt, both of San Antonio, for plaintiff in error. Boyle & Storey, of San Antonio, for defendants in error.
   PHILLIPS, C. J.

This suit involves the validity of Section 5 of the special act of the Thirty-Third Legislature making provision for a road system for Bexar County. Chapter 77, Regular Session Local and Special Laws.

The section reads:

“Each precinct county commissioner shall inspect and supervise from time to time all roads in his precinct, and shall do and perform any and all acts required of him by the commissioners’ court, and all other duties required of him by law as county commissioner, and shall receive for his services an annual salary of twenty-four hundred dollars ($2,400.00) per annum, to be paid out of the general fund of the road and bridge fund, or any other available fund or the special road and bridge fund, in monthly installments, and shall be in lieu of all other fees and per diem of all kinds now payable or that may hereafter be allowed by general law.”

The question is whether this amounts to a law “regulating the affairs” of the county and hence within the inhibition of Section 56 of Article 3 of the Constitution which declares that, except as otherwise therein provided, the Legislature shall not pass any local or special law regulating the affairs of counties, cities, towns, etc., and, further, that no local or special law shall be enacted where a general law can be made applicable, or is to be held as properly incident to a law for the maintenance of the public roads, such as the Legislature, under amended Section 9 of Article 8, may adopt as a local law without the previous constitutional notice.

We regard the section as a plain attempt to fix the compensation of the commissioners for all services required of them by law. The amounts payable to county commissioners in return for the discharge of their general duties are fixed by general laws, as they should be. It is provided by Article 3870 that they shall each receive three dollars for each day they are engaged in holding a term of the commissioners’ court; but shall receive no pay for holding more than one special term of the court per month. By Article 6901 as amended hy the Acts of 1913 (Acts 33d Leg. c. 123 [Vernon’s-Sayles’ Ann. Oiv. St. 1914, art. 6901]), they are constituted supervisors of the public roads of their counties, and their compensation for services as such is fixed at three dollars per day for the time actually employed in those duties, limited to not more than ten days in one month. By Section 5 of this special act (Loe. & Sp. Acts 33d Leg. c. 77) these general laws are declared as superseded. It says that the annual salary of $2,400.00 for each commissioner of Bexar County there provided shall be “in lieu of all other fees and per diem of all kinds now payable or that may hereafter be allowed by general law.” This simply means that for their general services their compensation shall be no longer as limited by the general law, but shall be as fixed by this law. The salary thus- provided for, in other.words, was intended to cover, not merely their services having to do with the public roads as required by the act, but all services required of them by law. Just what relation a local law making provision for a county road system can properly have to the subject of the general compensation of county commissioners, it is difficult to perceive. No doubt the Legislature, in the passage of local road laws, may, within proper bounds, provide compensation for extra services to be performed by those officials where uncontrolled by general laws* and required by such local laws and directly connected with the maintenance of the public roads. We are not called upon to .determine that question here. But under the guise of such a law it has no authority to legislate upon the subject of their general compensation or to alter the general laws governing it. We think that is what this act plainly attempted to do. We therefore hold the section in question to be unconstitutional.

As indicating the broad scope of this act and throwing light upon the purpose of section 5, though essentially a local law and denominated as an act making provision for a road system for Bexar County, it attempts, in another section, to fix the ex-officio compensation of the county judge at not less than $2,500.00.

The judgments of-the Court of Civil Appeals and the District Court are reversed and the cause remanded to the District Court. 
      dfesEor otter oases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes