Case ID: nj-eq_88/html/0599-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hugh A. Smith, petitioner-appellant, v. Charlotte M. Loveland Smith, defendant-respondent.
    [Decided January 31st, 1918.]
    On appeal front a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Baches, whose opinion is reported in '98 All. Rep. SJfi-
    
    
      Mr. John H. Kafes, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Alexander Trapp, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed front will be affirmed, for thé reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baches.

For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 13.

For reversal — None.