Case ID: f-appx_22/html/0701-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Michael C. HUGHES, Appellant.
    No. 01-1832.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 4, 2002.
    Decided Jan. 8, 2002.
    Before BOWMAN, BRIGHT, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
   [UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Michael C. Hughes pleaded guilty to attempted possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1994), and the District Court sentenced him to fifty-one months’ imprisonment and three years’ supervised release. On appeal, Hughes argues that the Court failed to make factual findings at sentencing concerning his criminal history, and that it was required to do so given his objection to the presentence report (PSR).

After carefully reviewing the record, we cannot agree with Hughes that he objected to the PSR at sentencing. In fact, after the Court rejected a recommended victim-related enhancement, Hughes’s counsel expressly informed the Court that Hughes had no other objection to the PSR. The Court therefore committed no error in adopting the rest of the PSR’s factual findings. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(b)(6)(D) (stating that District Court may accept unob-jeeted-to portions of PSR).

Accordingly, we affirm. 
      
      . The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.