Case ID: ind-app_83/html/0365-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "McMahan, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

American Creosoting Company v. Reddington.
    [No. 11,409.
    Filed February 18, 1925.
    Rehearing denied April 28, 1925.
    Transfer denied June 30, 1925.]
    
      Judgment.—Review of judgment not permissible after time for. appeal has expired.—An action to review a judgment cannot be prosecuted where the time for taking an appeal has expired.
    From Decatur Circuit Court; John D. Megee, ‘Special Judge.
    Action by the American Creosoting Company against William Reddington. From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals. Appeal-dismissed. By the second division.
    
      Goddard & Hite and Watson & Esarey, for,appellant.
    
      Charles L. Tindall, Donald L. Smith, John H. Kipling er, Ed K. Adams and Thomas E. Davidson, for appellee.
   McMahan, J.

On February 16, 1915, appellant filed its complaint to review a judgment rendered against it and in favor of appellee, March 21, 1914; a motion for a new trial having been overruled prior to the rendition of the judgment.

From a judgment denying the review, appellant appeals. Appellee, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for the reason that appellant’s complaint to review was filed more than 180 days after the original judgment was rendered and at a time when there was no right to an appeal from that judgment.

On authority of Talge Mahogany Co. v. Astoria Mahogany Co. (1923), 195 Ind. 433, 141 N. E. 50, 145 N. E. 495, motion to dismiss is sustained, and appeal dismissed.