Case ID: so2d_755/html/0805-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Debbie M. KENT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D99-2295.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    April 17, 2000.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; David A. Davis, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Thomas D. Winokur and Charmaine Millsaps, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, the sole issue raised by appellant was not preserved for review because the argument made on appeal was not made in the trial court. § 924.051(l)(b) & (3), Fla. Stat. (1999). See Terry v. State, 668 So.2d 954, 961 (Fla.1996) (“for an argument to be cognizable on appeal, it must be the specific contention asserted as the legal ground for objection, exception, or motion below”). To the extent any error occurred, it is not “fundamental.” Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

MINER, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., CONCUR.