Case ID: nys_51/html/1142-12.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HARRIS, Appellant, v. BROWN, Respondent.
    (City Court of- New York, General Term.
    May 10, 1898.)
    Action by Mina Harris against Louisiana Brown. Samuel F. Hyams, for appellant. Robert B. Bach, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The allowances made by the referee, we think, were proper and just, and within the provisions of lease. If the expenditures were not necessarily made, the plaintiff was certainly in a position (she being, the tenant in possession of the demised premises) to prove the fact that they were unnecessary or extravagant. This she failed to do; in fact, made no attempt to do so. The plaintiff’s testimony shows that all repairs made were necessary, and the charges therefor reasonable. The new roof was put on under an agreement whereby plaintiff agreed to bear the expense thereof. The judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.