Case ID: sw2d_963/html/0267-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bernice WITTMAACK and Chester Wittmaack, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Terry ARNOLD, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. 71840.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Dec. 9, 1997.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 9, 1998.
    Application for Transfer Denied March 24, 1998.
    
      Ray A. Gerritzen, Gerritzen & Gerritzen, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Thomas M. Pavelko, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for defendant in negligence ease arising out of a rear-end automobile collision. There is sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict. No error of law appears.

An opinion reciting the detañed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons' for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).