Case ID: so2d_599/html/1053-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Curtis FREEMAN, Appellee.
    No. 91-2402.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    June 17, 1992.
    
      Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the information as being overly broad as to the time frame charged. See State v. Jones, 539 So.2d 535 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Our affirmance is without prejudice to the state filing a new information with the time frame more narrowly drawn.

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, DELL and POLEN, JJ„ concur.