Case ID: f-appx_30/html/0252-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Donald M. ALFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George F. MELTZER, individually and as an employee of Snyder National Carriers, Incorporated; Schneider Specialized Carriers, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees, and Snyder National Carriers, Incorporated, Defendant.
    No. 01-2121.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 25, 2002.
    Decided March 11, 2002.
    Donald M. Alford, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel C. Cooper, Steptoe & Johnson, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Donald M. Alford appeals the district court’s judgment entered pursuant to the jury’s verdict in favor of the Appellees in this civil action and the court’s order denying his motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Alford offers only conclusory assertions in support of his claim that the Appellees were responsible for his automobile accident. In addition, Alford failed to object to Appellees’ cross-examination of Alford regarding his medication, and failed to move for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(b). Accordingly, we affirm. See Alford v. Meltzer, No. CA-99-6-1 (N.D.W. Va. filed Sept. 7, 2001, entered Sept. 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.