Case ID: minn_92/html/0488-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PHŒBE STREETER v. M. R. BROWN and Another.
    
    July 1, 1904.
    Nos. 13,956—(195).
    Boundary,
    Appeal by defendant Katharine Baatz from an order of the district court for Polk county, Watts, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
    Affirmed.
    
      H. Steenerson and Charles Coring, for appellant.
    
      A. A. Miller, for respondent.
    
      
       Reported in 100 N. W. 1126.
    
   PER CURIAM.

The inquiry in this action at the trial in the court below involved the location of the true boundary line between certain lots in the city of Crookston, owned by the respective parties. No controversy upon the law governing the decision of the trial court requires notice or comment. The question involved.was purely one of fact, and upon careful examination of the record we have reached the conclusion that the findings of the learned trial court cannot be disturbed, and are not so palpably against the weight of evidence as to warrant a reversal of its order denying a new trial, which is affirmed.

Order affirmed.