Case ID: f-appx_34/html/0955-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wallene Antoinette GAITHER, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-6205.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted May 16, 2002.
    Decided May 23, 2002.
    Wallene Antoinette Gaither, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Albert Jamison Lang, Office of the United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Wallene Antoinette Gaither appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for a new trial pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 33, or, in the alternative, for dismissal of the indictment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Gaither, No. CR-98-202 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.