Case ID: f-appx_325/html/0868-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alan EASON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-15952
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    May 7, 2009.
    Alan Eason, Jesup, GA, pro se.
    Patricia D. Barksdale, Jacksonville, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    
      Before DUBINA, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

W. Charles Fletcher, appointed counsel for Alan Eason in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Eason’s revocation of supervised release and resulting sentence are AFFIRMED. Eason’s request for appointment of appellate counsel is accordingly DENIED AS MOOT.