Case ID: sw2d_756/html/0599-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard GRIFFIN, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Barbara GRIFFIN, Respondent-Appellant.
    No. 53823.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Aug. 2, 1988.
    Rehearing Denied Sept. 12, 1988.
    Wilson Gray, St. Louis, for respondent-appellant.
    J. Michael Benson, Clayton, for petitioner-respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Wife appeals from a dissolution decree; we affirm. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).