Case ID: ga-app_1/html/0446-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Powell, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

130.
    James v. Bowser.
    Hammond, J. The .suit was for the purchase-pi'ice of a tank. The basis of the suit was a written contract. This contract was assailed because of failure of consideration, ambiguity, and fraud. We think the issues presented were fairly submitted by the judge of the trial court to the jury, which returned a verdict for the plaintiff; and therefore the judge , of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari and refusing to order a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
    
    Certiorari, from Early superior court — Judge Sheffield. April 3, 1906.
    Argued February 25,
    Decided March 19, 1907.
    
      Glessner & Poitle, for plaintiff in error. W. G. Park, contra.
   Powell, J.,

being disqualified, Judge Hammond, of the Augusta circuit, was •designated to preside in his stead.