Case ID: so2d_817/html/1039-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard L. BRANT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D02-1289.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 5, 2002.
    Richard L. Brant, in proper person.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of appellant Richard L. Brant’s motion for post-conviction relief as to grounds 4 and 5. Denial of defense motions for acquittal, on the charges of possession with intent to sell and for aggravated assault on law enforcement, are not cognizable under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See, e.g. Johnson v. State, 649 So.2d 948 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)(issue which can be brought on direct appeal not cognizable by motion for post conviction relief).