Case ID: f-appx_551/html/0563-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carmelo ROSADO-CURBELO, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carmelo Rosado-Curbelo, Defendant-Appellant.
    Nos. 13-12662, 13-12672
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Jan. 23, 2014.
    Aileen Cannon, Kathleen Mary Salyer, Wifredo A. Ferrer, Jared M. Strauss, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    
      Michael Caruso, Federal Public Defender, Bonnie Phillips-Williams, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Samuel J. Randall, Kenny Nachwalter, PA, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before PRYOR, FAY, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Carmelo Rosado-Curbelo appeals his 33-month (upward variance) sentence; and his 18-month sentence imposed following the revocation of the supervised release in two cases (although he raises no argument on appeal about his 18-month sentence). In context of the record, the district court’s explanation for his 33-month sentence, though brief, was adequate; and that sentence was procedurally reasonable. See United States v. Agbai, 497 F.3d 1226 (11th Cir.2007). The court’s 33-month sentence was also substantively reasonable in the light of the record and the relevant sentencing factors identified in 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a) and 3853(e), particularly given Rosado-Curbelo’s problems with recidivism and with adhering to the terms of his supervised release.

AFFIRMED.