Case ID: sd_56/html/0001-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER GURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE, Respondent, v. PECK, Appellant.
    (227 N. W. 199.)
    (File No. 6824.
    Opinion filed November 8, 1929.)
    
      T. H. Luby, of Huron, and Geo. J. Dan forth, of Sioux Falls, for Appellant.
    
      M. Q. Sharpe, Attorney General, and R. R. Dre-wry, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
   PER GURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of rape in the first degree and appeals to this court. After a careful examination of the record and attentive consideration to the arguments of counsel, we are of the opinion that the record as preserved and presented to this court fails to show any error prejudicial to the defendant.

The judgment and order appealed from are therefore affirmed.