Case ID: so2d_685/html/0101-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lawrence CUMMINGS, Appellant, v. Susan CUMMINGS, Appellee.
    Nos. 96-2937, 96-3760.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Jan. 8, 1997.
    Arthur J. England, Jr., Elliot H. Scherker, and John G. Crabtree of Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Rosen & Quentel, P.A., Miami, and Donald J. Sasser, Jorge M. Cestero, and Thomas J. Sasser of Donald J. Sasser, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Philip M. Burlington of Caruso, Burlington, Bohn & Compiani, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We reverse the contempt orders. On remand we direct the trial court to determine what portion of the purge amount was necessary for support. Further, we direct that appellant’s present ability to pay also be determined as the record before this court reflects that appellant’s pending bankruptcy frustrates same.

GLICKSTEIN, STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.