Case ID: nc_1-2/html/0093-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "the Court.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stanly et uxor versus Kean.
    THIS was an ejectment, brought to recover a lot which Mrs. Stanly claimed as heiress to Fonville. The defendant set up a title under the will of Fonville, a copy of which he offered in evidence, the original having been proved in the County Court, by two subscribing witnesses, and thereupon admitted to registration.
    The probate of will in the County Court is prima facie evidence.
    The evidence was objected to, on the ground that one of the witnesses was a legatee under the will, which therefore was irregularly proved ; and that it was only in those cases, where the probate was regular, that a copy could be admistible under the act of 1784, Cap. 10 Sec. 6, which enacts that “ all probates of wills in the county courts, “ shall be sufficient testimony for the devise of real estates ; and the attested copies of such wills, “ or the records thereof by the proper officer, shall “ and may be given in evidence in the same manner as originals."
    
      Badger for the Plaintiff.
    
      Graham for the Defendant.
   By

the Court.

The copy is proper evidence unless there be a suggestion of fraud or irregularity, in the attestation or execution. It has been decided that a probate does not absolutely bind one who is not party to it ; but that he may cause the will to be proved again by calling all parties interested before the court which took the first probate, and re-examining the evidence concerning it.

By such a mode of proceeding, there is no danger of surprize to the parties, who are informed of the grounds upon which the will is to be contested, and may prepare themselves for the enquiry. So, if a foundation is laid for presuming such a fraud as would invalidate the will, the party claiming under it, in the trial of an ejectment, may be called upon to produce the original ; but then, he ought to have notice of the objection to be made, so that he might prepare to resist it. As this will has been admitted to probate and registration, by a court possessing competent authority ; all circumstances necessary to its validity must be presumed to have been duly established before them.

Non-suit.