Case ID: ga_160/html/0302-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Long v. The State.
    No. 4710.
    May 14, 1925.
    Question certified by Court of Appeals (Case No. 15420).
    
      Orrin Roberts and II. II. Chandler, for plaintiff in error.
    
      W. 0. Dean, solicitor-general, contra.
   Per Curiam.

Tlie question propounded in this ease is identical with the first question propounded in the ease of Long v. State, ante, 292; and the question here propounded is therefore answered in the negative.

All the Justices concur, except Bussell, O. J., and Hill, J., dissenting, and G-ilberi, J., absent for providential cause.