Case ID: so3d_158/html/0752-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Maurice HENRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D14-2134.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Feb. 23, 2015.
    Jeffrey E. Lewis, General Counsel, and Michael J. Titus, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel Region One, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

This court’s independent review of the record and pertinent legal authority, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and In re Anders Briefs, 581 So.2d 149 (Fla.1991), reveals no meritorious point which might support reversal of the conviction and sentence. We commend An-ders counsel for his brief on Appellant’s behalf, which examined points of possible merit to assist in this court’s review. The brief demonstrates a thorough review of the record and meticulous application of the law governing the trial proceedings, including citations to the record and to legal authorities.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.