Case ID: njl_119/html/0427-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MAY RICHTER, RESPONDENT, v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Submitted October 29, 1937
    Decided January 26, 1938.
    For the appellant, Edwin Joseph O’Brien.
    
    For the respondent, George G. Tartar.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chibe Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Heher, Perskie, Deae, WolesKeil, Raeeekty, JJ. 8.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Bodine, Heteield, Wells, Walker, JJ. 5.