Case ID: ny-super-ct_47/html/0526-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BENJAMIN WRIGHT, as Receiver, &c., Respondent, v. ELBERT NOSTRAND, et al., Appellants.
    Before Speir and Freedman, JJ.
    
      Decided February 7, 1881.
    Appeal by defendants from an order adjudging that plaintiff’s proceedings in this action are not stayed by the operation of a previous order, which required plaintiff to file either security for the. costs of this action, or the “written consents, duly proved and acknowledged,” of the judgment creditors represented by plaintiff as receiver, that this action be brought at their respective risks.
    
      Thomas & Wilder, attorneys, and Edward P.Wilder, of counsel, for appellants.
    
      Henry D. Betts, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.