Case ID: ga_177/html/0827-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Hill, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

COCHRAN v. SPINKS et al.
    
    No. 9519.
    November 10, 1933.
    
      
      A. E. Wilson, for plaintiff.
    
      V. E. Addms, Ha/rry 8. McCotmn, and O'arl T. Hudgins, for defendants.
   Hill, J.

The allegations of the petition as amended, to the effect that Spinks did not in fact have on deposit $1133 as money belonging to his ward, as he alleged in his application to the court to permit the loan, and that in fact he did not borrow $1050 from his ward’s estate, considered in connection with the other averments, as against a general demurrer, sufficiently alleged fraud in procuring the order of the court and the deed executed by the guardian to his ward, as the basis for a court of equity to decree cancellation; and it was error to sustain the demurrers, except as to the surety company, no relief being prayed as to it.

Judgment reversed.

All the Juslices concur.