Case ID: cust-ct_35/html/0211-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Johnson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Before the Third Division,
    July 7, 1955
    No. 59213.
    protest 244338-K (New York).
    Lansen-Naeve Corp. v. United States,
   Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, the collector’s memorandum was offered in evidence wherein it is stated that, following the customs regulations, the merchandise would now be liquidated free of duty under paragraph 1607 and that, the collector’s period of review having expired, he would have no objection to a stipulation to that effect. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.