Case ID: so2d_990/html/0397-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PITTMAN, Judge. THOMPSON, Presiding Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Angela M. BOWDEN v. William M. BOWDEN.
    2060440.
    Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.
    Nov. 16, 2007.
    Rehearing Denied March 14, 2008.
    
      Lisa C. Robinson, Birmingham, for appellant.
    Submitted on appellant’s brief only.
   PITTMAN, Judge.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(A), Ala. R.App. P.; Rule 28(a)(10), Ala. R.App. P.; FabArc Steel Supply, Inc. v. Composite Constr. Sys., Inc., 914 So.2d 344, 354 (Ala.2005); Ex parte Elliott, 782 So.2d 308, 311 (Ala.2000); TenEyck v. TenEyck, 885 So.2d 146, 159 (Ala.Civ.App.2003); Britt v. Britt, 684 So.2d 1325, 1326 (Ala.Civ.App.1996); Golden v. Golden, 681 So.2d 605, 608 (Ala.Civ.App.1996); Carter v. Carter, 666 So.2d 28, 29 (Ala.Civ.App.1995); Scholl v. Parsons, 655 So.2d 1060, 1062 (Ala.Civ.App.1995); and Silvey v. Silvey, 634 So.2d 138, 140 (Ala.Civ.App.1993).

BRYAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

THOMPSON, P.J., concurs in part and dissents in part, with writing, which MOORE, J., joins.

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

Though I agree that most of the trial court’s judgment is due to be affirmed, I would reverse the trial court’s judgment insofar as it fails to reserve the issue of periodic alimony for the possibility of a future award.

MOORE, J., concurs.