Case ID: or_246/html/0049-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued February 6,
    dismissed February 15, 1967
    CAMPBELL, Respondent, v. CAMPBELL, Appellant.
    
    423 P. 2d 949
    
      James W. Walton, Corvallis, argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs were Bingo, Walton & McClain, Corvallis.
    
      Karl T. Hutson, Corvallis, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.
    Before Sloan, Presiding Justice, and Denecke and Lusk, Justices.
   PER CURIAM.

In this divorce proceeding plaintiff’s counsel, apparently in the mistaken belief that defendant did not wish to contest this case, obtained an order of default against defendant. Thereafter, defendant filed an answer together with appropriate affidavits seeldng to set aside the order of default. The court denied defendant’s motion and proceeded to hear the case and allowed a divorce in accordance with plaintiff’s complaint. Defendant attempts to appeal from the order refusing to set aside the default.

The challenged order is not an appealable order. Electrical Products Corp. v. Ziegler, 1937, 157 Or 267, 68 P2d 135. Walker v. Clyde et ux, 1956, 206 Or 322, 324, 292 P2d 1083.

Appeal dismissed.