Case ID: sw3d_165/html/0498-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Emile HENRY, Appellant.
    No. ED 84803.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    April 26, 2005.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 30, 2005.
    Stephen Reynolds, Clayton, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Leslie E. McNamara, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    
      Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Emile Henry (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction of two counts of robbery in the first degree. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in allowing certain closing argument by the prosecutor, and in allowing evidence of defendant’s uncharged misconduct.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).