Case ID: ohio-law-abs_13/html/0512-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "GARVER, PJ.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GALATI et v STATE
    Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co
    No 12276.
    Decided Jan 16, 1933
    
      Ben D. Zieve, Cleveland, and Joseph N. Ackerman, Cleveland, for plaintiffs in error.
    Frank T. Cullitan, Prosecuting Attorney, Cleveland, for defendant in error.
    GARVER, PJ, LEMERT and SHERICK, JJ (5th Dist), sitting.
   GARVER, PJ.

In 12 Ohio Jurisprudence 805, we find the following:

“Where a bill of exceptions is not filed within the statutory time, the judge is without authority to allow and sign such bill, the reviewing court acquires no jurisdiction, and the bill of exceptions must be stricken from the files. And where the errors charged are such as can be disclosed only by a bill of exceptions, the judgment must be affirmed. The bill of exceptions is not available unless filed in the Court of Common Pleas within the time fixed by that court, which under the provisions of §13680 GC (now §13445-1 GC as amended in 113 O.L. 191) cannot be more than thirty days from the overruling of the motion for new trial.”

Therefore, the judgment of the Common Pleas Court is affirmed. Exceptions may be noted.

SHERICK and LEMERT, JJ, concur in judgment