Case ID: so2d_620/html/1228-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eric Ennis RHOADS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 80851.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    June 24, 1993.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, for petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Ann P. Corcoran, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We review the decision of the district court of appeal, Rhoads v. State, 608 So.2d 817 (Fla. 2d DCA1992), on the ground of conflict. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981). The district court’s decision is quashed and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with State v. Johnson, 616 So.2d 1 (Fla.1993).

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.