Case ID: so2d_481/html/1278-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Manuel GARCIA and Elia Garcia, his wife, Appellants, v. Hector Vicente GARCIA, Dulce M. Garcia and Old Republic Insurance Company, Appellees.
    No. 85-1397.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Jan. 21, 1986.
    Friedman & Friedman and John S. Selig-man, Coral Gables, for appellants.
    Stinson, Lyons & Schuette and Mark D. Greenberg, Miami, for appellees.
    Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We agree with plaintiff, a dog bite victim, that a genuine issue of material fact was presented as to whether the defendants had posted on the property a conspicuous sign warning of the presence of a “bad dog.” Entry of a final summary judgment for the defendants was therefore erroneous. See Belcher Yacht, Inc. v. Stickney, 450 So.2d 1111 (Fla.1984); Carroll v. Moxley, 241 So.2d 681 (Fla.1970).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.