Case ID: f-appx_599/html/0523-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jesse G. YATES, III; Melissa Long Yates, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Julie GARRISON, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 14-2394.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 23, 2015.
    Decided: April 27, 2015.
    Jesse G. Yates, III, Melissa Long Yates, Appellants Pro Se. Richard Caldarone, Joan Iris Oppenheimer, United States Department of Justice, Washington D.C., for Appellee.
    ' Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jesse G. Yates, III, and Melissa Long Yates appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) and related claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yates v. Garrison, No. 5:14-cv-00068-RLV-DSC, 2014 WL 6605484 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 2014). We deny the Yateses’ motion to strike the informal response brief and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.