Case ID: ohio-st_66/html/0657-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 7263.
    Rienoehl v. Huonker, City Clerk, et al.
    (Decided April 1, 1902.)
    Error to the Circuit Court of Clark county.
    
      Mr. J. K. Mower and Mr. D. F. Beinoehl, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Mr. I). Z GdMner, city solicitor, for defendants in error.
   Judgment affirmed on the ground that the request should have been made of the solicitor in office,, and not of his predecessor; and on the further ground that injunction is not the proper remedy. The remedy is quo warranto.

Williams, C. J., Burket, Spear, Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.