Case ID: f-appx_211/html/0198-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Donald SULLIVAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Carson SMITH, individually and in his capacity as Sheriff of Pender County, North Carolina; Major Keith D. Hinkle; Captain Mark Sloan, individually and in their capacities as officers of the Sheriffs Department of Pender County, North Carolina; Deputy E.S. Wyrick, Jr.; Deputy Reed; Deputy Gonzales; Joe Doe, I; John Doe, II; John Doe III; Jane Doe, individually and in their capacities as deputies in the Sheriff's Department of Pender County, North Carolina; County of Pender; Magistrate Delores R. Helms, individually and in her capacity as an officer of the court for the Fifth Judicial District of North Carolina, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 06-1497.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 21, 2006.
    Decided: Dec. 28, 2006.
    Donald Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. James Redfern Morgan, Jr., Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; David J. Adinolfi, II, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Donald Sullivan appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sullivan v. Smith, No. 7:04-cv-00026-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.