Case ID: ny_191/html/0527-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Christopher Staiger, Respondent, v. Carl Soht et al., Appellants.
    
      Staiger v. So7it, 116 App. Div. 874, affirmed.
    (Argued March 4, 1908;
    decided March 6, 1908.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered February 4, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor -of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for an alleged breach of warranty.
    
      Henry W. Rudd and McCready Sykes for appellants.
    
      Henry Hoelljes for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cüllen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.