Case ID: ohio-cc-ns_14/html/0347-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ACTIONS FOR SERVICES.
    Circuit Court of Hamilton County.
    George F. Williams v. W. T. Crockett.
    
    Decided, July 9, 1910.
    
      Services — Averment of Wrongful Termination of — Denial of Special Contract — Action on-Implied Quantum Meruit.
    
    
      Burch & Johnson, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Chas. A. J. Walker, contra.
    Gi-eebn, P. J.; Smith, J., and Swing, J., concur.
    
      
       Affirmed by the Supreme Court without opinion, Williams v. Crockett, 84 Ohio St., p. — .
    
   The plaintiff in error not only denied the existence of any special contract with the defendant in error, but made such denial in writing before suit was commenced.

The defendant in error thereupon elected to sue as upon an implied quantum meruit for the value of the services rendered, and recovered a verdict. The judgment should be affirmed. Ralston v. Cole’s Administrator, 30 Ohio St., 92.