Case ID: sw3d_155/html/0835-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dwayne A. JACKSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 84413.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Feb. 1, 2005.
    Amanda R. Schehr, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Evan J. Buchheim, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dwayne A. Jackson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. He alleges his plea counsel provided ineffective assistance by advising him to plead guilty without investigating the facts or researching the law and by failing to request a mental evaluation.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).