Case ID: ohio-st-3d_47/html/0045-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State, ex rel. Kirtz, Appellant, v. Corrigan, Judge, Appellee.
    [Cite as State, ex rel. Kirtz, v. Corrigan (1989), 47 Ohio St. 3d 45.]
    (No. 88-1183
    Submitted October 24, 1989
    Decided November 29, 1989.)
    
      Russell P. Kirtz, pro se.
    
    
      Daniel O. Corrigan, pro se.
    
   Upon review of the matter presented to us, we find that appellant, Russell R. Kirtz, has stated a claim for relief. The judgment of the court of appeals dismissing appellant’s complaint in mandamus is reversed and this cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.