Case ID: so2d_442/html/1028-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. ANSTEAD, Chief Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HILLCREST EAST NO. 25, INC., a not-for-profit Florida corporation, Appellant, v. The HOLLYWOOD BEACH HOTEL DEVELOPMENT CO., INC., a Florida corporation, and Ben Tobin d/b/a the Hollywood Beach Hotel Company (not a corporation), Appellees.
    No. 82-692.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Dec. 7, 1983.
    J. Philip Landsman and George I. Platt of Schwartz & Nash, P.A., Fort Lauder-dale, for appellant.
    Vincent E. Damian, Jr., of Williams, Salo-mon, Kanner, Damian, Weissler & Brooks, Miami, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DOWNEY and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

ANSTEAD, C.J., concurs specially with opinion.

ANSTEAD, Chief Judge,

specially concurring:

I agree that the decision of the trial court should be affirmed because there is no real dispute as to the sufficiency of the language creating the easement challenged by the appellant. Neither is there a claim or proof of fraud or misrepresentation as to the extent or creation of the easement. Although there apparently was a question as to the improper allocation of responsibility for taxes on the easement area, this portion of the litigation was settled by the parties. In short, there is simply no proof in the record which would support a holding that the easement in question is unlawful.