Case ID: f-appx_393/html/0117-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

E. George MINNS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Commonwealth of VIRGINIA; Bill Mims, in his official and individual capacities; William (Bill) Watson, in his official and individual capacities; Melvin Hike, in his official and individual capacities; Kim M. Crump, in her individual capacity; John Doe(s), in his or her individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 10-1598.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 17, 2010.
    Decided: Aug. 31, 2010.
    E. George Minns, Appellant Pro Se.
    Stephen Michael Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Ap-pellees.
    Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

E. George Minns appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Minns v. Virginia, No. 2:09-cv-00283-JRS-FBS, 2010 WL 1375266 (E.D. Va. April 1, 2010); (May 3, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.