Case ID: so2d_338/html/0112-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DIXON and DENNIS, JJ.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James E. LaCROIX et al. v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO. et al.
    No. 58432.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Oct. 22, 1976.
   In re: James E. LaCroix applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, 333 So.2d 724, Second Circuit, Parish of Winn.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the court of appeal, the result is correct.

DIXON and DENNIS, JJ.,

are of the opinion the writ should be granted to clarify, if we can, Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc. and the per curiam on the denial of rehearing. If anything is clear, it is that Hero does not require ultra-hazardous activity before the neighbors can recover loss of value caused by a 667 violation.