Case ID: so2d_571/html/0122-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert Lee ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 90-479.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 26, 1990.
    Robert Lee Alexander, in pro. per.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Patricia Ann Ash, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and COPE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

As the matters contained in appellant Robert Lee Alexander’s post-conviction motion were not cognizable under Rule 3.800(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, the motion was correctly denied, and would have been long ago time barred if asserted by motion under Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Affirmed.