Case ID: nj-eq_45/html/0857-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James Finnegan and Margaret Finnegan, appellants, v. William Tinnock, respondent.
    On appeal from a decree of the chancellor, setting aside certain transfers of chattels and lands made by James Finnegan to his wife, Margaret Finnegan, because fraudulent as to William Tinnock, a judgment creditor of James Finnegan, whose judgment, founded on his endorsement and subsequent payment of a promissory note of James Finnegan, had not been obtained when the transfers were made.
    
      Mr. S. B. Ransom, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. George S. Hilton and Mr. Henry E. Samuels, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

This decree unanimously affirmed.