Case ID: nj_1/html/0491-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SIMON WOLK, COMPLAINANT-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM WIDLANSKY, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
    Argued February 21, 1949
    Decided February 28, 1949.
    
      Mr. Samuel H. Nelson argued the cause for the complainant-appellant (Mr. Herman H. Anekstein, attorney).
    
      
      Mir. Stephen V. R. Strong argued tHe cause for the defendants-respondents (Messrs. Strong & Strong, attorneys)
   Per Curiam.

The decree under review will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice Chancellor Jayne in the former Court of Chancery.

For affirmance: Chief Justice Vanderbilt and Justices Case, Heher, Wacheneeld, Burling, and Ackerson—6.

For reversal: None.