Case ID: f-appx_328/html/0531-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Steven FERGUSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS GOLF CLUB, LLC; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 07-16930.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 16, 2009.
    
    Filed July 6, 2009.
    Steven Ferguson, Lompoc, CA, pro se.
    Tami Denise Cowden, Mark E. Ferrario, Esquire, Kummer Kaempfer Bonner Ren-shaw & Ferrario, John M. Sacco, Esquire, Frank M. Flansburg, III, Esquire, Marquis & Aurbach, Sean L. Anderson, Esquire, Leach Johnson Song & Gruchow, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: PAEZ, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Steven Ferguson appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendants in his action alleging violations of the federal Fair Housing Act and various state laws in connection with his residence in a planned community and membership in a golf club. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Universal Health Servs. Inc. v. Thompson, 363 F.3d 1013, 1019 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm.

We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order granting summary judgment, entered on September 20, 2007. Ferguson advances no argument challenging the district court’s order granting summary judgment, and we therefore deem any such argument abandoned. See Indep. Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir.2003) (explaining that issues not argued on appeal are deemed abandoned).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.