Case ID: conn-supp_1/html/0144-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PEASLEY, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LILLIE E. DICKERMAN vs. LOMAS NETTLETON CO., TRUSTEE, ET AL.
    Superior Court New Haven County
    File #46416
    Present: Hon. FREDERICK M. PEASLEY, Judge.
    H. L. Dickerman, Attorney for the Plaintiff.
    Clark, Hall & Peck, Attorneys for the Defendant.
    
      MEMORANDUM FILED MARCH 28, 1935.
   PEASLEY, J.

The answer in this case is voluminous and in some paragraph violates the rule against the pleading of evidential matters, but threaded through the whole of the nineteen paragraphs a proper, legal defense can be discerned. The motion to expunge would in this case, if granted, perform the function of a demurrer, and it has been repeatedly held that it can not be made to serve that purpose.

The motion to expunge is therefore denied.