Case ID: ala_140/html/0662-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte Turner et al.
    
    Charles L. Bromberg and Massey Wilson, for petitioners.
    No counsel marked as appearing for respondent.
   Opinion

Per Curiam.

Tbe petition in tbis case was addressed to tbe judges of tbe Supreme Court, and asked for a rule nisi to be directed to tbe chancellor of tbe Southwestern Chancery Division, commanding him to show'cause why a peremptory writ of mandamus should not issue commanding him to make an order requiring tbe complainant in a cause pending in tbe chancery court of Mobile county, to furnish security for costs of said cause, as was prayed for in a motion made in said chancery court by tbe petitioners.

Tbe application for tbe rule nisi was denied.