Case ID: njl_124/html/0563-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MAX BELL ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. MORRIS SIWOFF, RESPONDENT.
    Submitted February 16, 1940 —
    Decided April 25, 1940.
    For the appellants, Maurice D. Emont.
    
    For the respondent, Vincent M. Rotolo.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Case, Bodine, Hehek, Peeskie, Heteield, Dbae, Wells, WolesKeil, Hague, JJ. 9.

For reversal — Pabkek, Raeeekty, JJ. 2.