Case ID: f-appx_267/html/0494-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Rose ADELIA-MARTINEZ, Appellant.
    No. 07-1765.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 26, 2008.
    Filed: Feb. 29, 2008.
    
      Lynnett M. Wagner, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Lincoln, NE, for Appellee.
    Michael D. Nelson, Omaha, NE, for Appellant.
    Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Rose Adelia-Martinez (Adelia-Martinez) challenges the sentence the district court imposed after Adelia-Martinez pled guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1) and 846. For reversal, Adelia-Martinez argues the district court erred in finding she was not eligible for safety-valve relief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) and U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2.

Upon careful review of the record, we conclude the court did not clearly err in finding Adelia-Martinez did not truthfully provide the government with all the information and evidence she had concerning offenses related to the conspiracy. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f); United States v. Soto, 448 F.3d 993, 995-96 (8th Cir.2006) (stating the clear-error standard of review; upholding a denial of safety-valve relief where the defendant’s story about his role in the offense, contradicted interviews of the co-defendants; noting an appellate court generally does not disturb the district court’s credibility findings).

We affirm. 
      
      . The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.