Case ID: nj-eq_85/html/0603-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ida Katherine Baker, respondent, v. Ramon Van Arnum Baker, appellant.
    [Submitted December 6th, 1915.
    Decided March 6th, 1916.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Advisory Master Charles H. Hartshorne.
    
      Mr. Addison Fly, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. James 17. Miller, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed* in the court below by Advisory Master Hartshorne.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Terhune, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Taylor—14.

For reversal—-None.