Case ID: so2d_222/html/0205-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Roy Charles HULING, Petitioner, v. FICKLING BROTHERS PLASTERING AND DRY WALL, Employers Liability Assurance and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
    No. 38318.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    May 7, 1969.
    Cleveland & Shaaber, Jacksonville, for petitioner.
    George Stelljes, Jr., of Marks, Gray, Yates, Conroy & Gibbs, Jacksonville, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date January 21, 1969.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

Petitioner’s application 'for attorneys’ fees is also denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.