Case ID: sw2d_938/html/0302-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DOWD, Presiding Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John Gilbert SKAGGS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Beverly Ann SKAGGS, Respondent.
    No. 70454.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Jan. 28, 1997.
    R. Scott Harness, Crystal City, for petitioner-appellant.
    David P. Senkel, Hillsboro, for respondent.
   DOWD, Presiding Judge.

John Gilbert Skaggs (“Husband”) appeals from the dismissal of his motion to modify a prior decree of legal separation. We dismiss the appeal.

In June 1994, Husband and Beverly Ann Skaggs (“Wife”) entered into a separation agreement which was incorporated into a Decree of Legal Separation. In June of the following year, Husband filed a motion to modify and convert the Decree of Separation into a Decree of Dissolution. Wife made a special appearance to contest the sufficiency of the allegations in the motion and the service of process. The trial court dismissed the motion without prejudice.

Although not addressed by either party, we must consider, sua sponte, issues which determine whether this court has jurisdiction to consider Husband’s appeal. White v. Pruneau, 913 S.W.2d 959 (Mo.App. E.D.1996). Here, the trial court specifically dismissed Husband’s motion “without prejudice.” The general rule is that a dismissal without prejudice is not a final judgment. Id.; Waltrip v. Davis, 899 S.W.2d 147, 148 (Mo.App. E.D.1995). An appeal from such a dismissal is proper only if it has the practical effect of terminating the litigation in the form in which it is cast or in the plaintiffs chosen forum. Fitzpatrick v. Hannibal Re gional Hosp., 922 S.W.2d 840, 842 (Mo.App. E.D.1996).

We find no such effect here and therefore dismiss the appeal.

REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ., concur.