Case ID: f-appx_582/html/0151-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eric HEMPHILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARAMARK CORPORATION; Aramark Campus Services LLC, Defendants-Appellees, and Aramark, Inc., Defendant.
    No. 14-1326.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 7, 2014.
    Decided: Aug. 20, 2014.
    Eric Hemphill, Appellant Pro Se. Kaiser H. Chowdhry, William J. Delany, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
    Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Eric Hemphill appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hemphill v. Aramark Corp., No. 1:12-ev-01584-ELH, 2014 WL 1248296 (D. Md. filed Mar. 25, 2014; entered Mar. 26, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.