Case ID: pa_342/html/0377-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Chief Justice Schaffer,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Susquehanna Collieries Company Appeal.
    Argued May 28, 1941.
    . Before Schaffer, C. J., Maxey, Drew, Linn, Stern, Patterson and Parker, J J.
    
      
      Walter R. Bohn and E. LeRoy Keen, for appellants.
    
      Earl V. Compton, for appellee, was not heard.
    June 30, 1941:
   Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Schaffer,

This is. an appeal by the County of Dauphin, the Township of Wiconisco and the School District of that Township, from the assessment, of-certain coal lands belonging to the Susquehanna Collieries Company.

The Board of Revision assessed the property at $717,964. On the Collieries Company’s appeal to the Common Pleas, the assessment . was reduced to $141,328.50. The figures fixed by the court are based upon 50 per cent of estimated value, that being the ratio of assessment to value in the district.

The property consists of an abandoned and flooded mine. It is the deepest in the anthracite fields, 2200 feet below the mouth of the shaft and in places 2900 feet beneath the surface of the ground. The mine has been operated since prior to 1850. On April 1, 1933, because of' the losses su&tained in operation, it wfis abandoned and permitted to fill with water. In the last five years during which mining was carried' on, the loss amounted to $1,048,840. To restore the mine to production, will involve an initial outlay of $300,000, with no assurance that after this large expenditure, the enterprise will be profitable.

We pointed out in Phila. & Reading Coal Iron Bo. v. Commissioners of Northumberland County, 323 ,Pa. 185, 186 A. 105, that coal under the surface of the land is of little value if it cannot be mined profitably.

There was evidence supporting the value fixed. This being so, the finding of the cdurt must be affirmed: Park’s Appeal, 334 Pa. 193, 5 A. 2d 561; North American Building Corp. v. Phila., 341 Pa. 152, 17 A. 2d 342. Particularly is this so as to this property- When the circumstances connected with it, to which we have adverted, are taken into account. = .

Order affirmed at appellants’ cost.