Case ID: ga-l-rep_1/html/0373-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Jackson, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anderson vs. Barksdale.
    Case from Wilkes New Trial. Witness. Experts. , Before Judge Lumpkin.)
   Jackson, C. J.

Where, in a suit for injury from the water of a mill dam, whereby the plaintiff’s land was made too wet for cultivation, the evidence was con dieting, this court will not control the discretion of the presiding judge in refusing to grant a new trial on the ground that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence.

VV. M. & M. P. Reese, for plaintiff in error.

Hardeman & Irvin, for defendant.

(a) The weight of all testimony, whether from experts or not, is-for the jury, under proper instructions from the court.

Judgment affirmed.