Case ID: misc_27/html/0777-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Freedman, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James Jackson, Respondent, v. The New Amsterdam Gas Co., Appellant.
    Appeal by the defendant from a judgment rendered-in favor of the plaintiff in the Municipal Court, second district, borough of Manhattan.,
    Joseph J. Myers, for appellant*
    Henry Daily, Jr., for respondent.
   Freedman, P. J.

There is a direct conflict of testimony on the questions of fact arising in this case, and the trial court decided in favor of the plaintiff.

The record does not disclose that injustice has been done, nor . does it show- either bias, prejudice, or partiality, or that- it is against the weight of evidence. The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed.

MacLean and Leventritt, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.