Case ID: nj-eq_83/html/0346-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William Bayley, appellant, v. Sarah Bayley, respondent.
    [Argued March 4th, 1914.
    Decided March 4th, 1914.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Advisory Master Halsey M. Barrett.
    
      Mr. Absalom P. Bachman, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Jerome 1). Q-edney, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court -below by Advisory Master Halsey M. Barrett.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, White — 11.

For reversal — Hone.