Case ID: f-appx_189/html/0680-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert Dale PUCKETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rick L. BOLLAR; et al., Defendants— Appellees.
    No. 05-36220.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    July 17, 2006.
    
    Filed July 21, 2006.
    Robert Dale Puckett, Rupert, ID, pro se.
    Roger Lee Gabel, Esq., AGID — Office of the Idaho Attorney General, Martin C. Hendrickson, Esq., Moore & Baskin, LLP, Boise, ID, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: B. FLETCHER, HAWKINS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
    
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
    
   MEMORANDUM **

A review of the record and response to the order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.

All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.