Case ID: ga_42/html/0656-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Polly Wynn, plaintiff in error, vs. S. J. Benning, administrator, defendant in error.
    If the hill of exceptions be changed by the Judge after service is acknowledged upon it, it must be served anew. (R.)
    This bill of exceptions appears to have been certified on the 11th of July, 1870. Service was acknowledged upon it on the 16th of July. It appears to have been changed after the original draft, and the certificate of the Judge is dated 30th of July, 1870 — thirty being written over eleven. Counsel for defendant said that the bill of exceptions had been changed since said acknowledgment, and had thereby become a new cause, and the old acknowledgment did not apply to it. It was dismissed for want of service.
    Eamsey & Eamsey, for plaintiff in error.
    H. L. Penning, M. J. Crawford, for defendant.