Case ID: so2d_516/html/0102-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gabriel CRISTANCHO, Maria Cristancho, Miquel Mendez, Elsa Mendez, Santo Mazzei, Ligia Landazuri, L. Martin, Miquel Martin, Neri Martin, Teresa DeRestrepo, Patricia L. Arango, Edgar Torney, Guillermo Cubillos Escobar, Celmira Escobar, Stella DeFonrrodna, Donald Jackrel, Miriann Jackrel, Luis F. Restrepo, Henry Cabal, Edilma Cabal, Jose Mattei, Carmen Mattei, Pelaez Lopez, Silvio Lopez, Mercedes Lopez, Javier Restrepo, Eugenia Restrepo, Phillip Lifshtz, Claire Lifshtz, Mauricio Daes, Alicia P. Daes, Goya Zaffatil Waisman, Juan C. Verhookm, Agustin Fontes, Roas de Fontes, G. Morales, Eduardo Morales, Alicia Morales, Dawm L. Spring, Robert M. Spring, Basilio Magurno, Giuseppe De Michele, Frances Smith, Myron Schwartz, Sandra Schwartz, Martin F. Wajeman, Betty Wajeman, Nino S. Doloreto, Gary W. Lugo, Rosemarie Ahing, Jose Saul Dominquez, Alba Dominquez, I. Rafael Lale, Rafael Mendoza Morales, Medin Morales, and Charles Mallorca, Appellants, v. VILLAGE HOMES IN BONAVENTURE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida corporation not-for- profit, Gale Housing Corporation, a Florida corporation, Gale Venture Corporation, a Florida corporation, Bon West, Inc., a Florida corporation, Robert J. Gale, Henry E. Marks, Eric D. Isenbergh, Arnold H. Gottfried, Stan Fried, Shirley Reeves, Ron Grossman, and Joe Hefferman, jointly and severally, Appellees.
    No. 4-86-2974.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Dec. 9, 1987.
    Dennis S. Lefkowitz, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
    
      Shelley H. Leinicke of Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Tutan, O’Hara, McCoy, Graham & Lane, Fort Lauderdale, for Village Homes in Bonaventure Homeowners Ass’n, Inc.
    Barry S. Franklin of Young, Stern & Tannenbaum, P.A., North Miami Beach, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

The trial judge correctly concluded that the second amended complaint fails to state a cause of action. However appellants have satisfied us that if given the opportunity they could plead sufficient ultimate facts to support a proper cause of action. Therefore we reverse the trial court’s order of dismissal with prejudice and remand this cause with instructions to permit appellants to file a third amended complaint.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DOWNEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.