Case ID: nj_59/html/0240-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROBERT STUPIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PRIMITIVO SANCHEZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, RESPONDENT.
    Argued September 13, 1971
    Decided September 27, 1971.
    
      Mr. Stephen Mongiello■ argued the cause for appellant.
    
      Mr. Martin L. Sisselman argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. James <& Addas, attorneys).
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Halpern (113 N. J. Super. 84).

For affirmmce—Chief Justice Weinteaub and Justices Jacobs, Eeancis, Peoctoe, Schettino and Mountain—6.

For reversal—None.