Case ID: ny-2d_49/html/0745-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Louise R. Spillman, Also Known as Louise S. Bryant, Respondent, v Richard W. Spillman, Appellant.
    Argued January 8, 1980;
    decided February 7, 1980
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Charles F. Darlington, III, for appellant.
    
      Richard C. Fields for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated by that court. In addition we cannot say that the Appellate Division’s conclusion that the reconstructed record was adequate for its review was erroneous as a matter of law.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.