Case ID: f-appx_673/html/0361-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stephen SATCHER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Leonard ODDO, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 16-7037
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: January 20, 2017
    Decided: January 25, 2017
    Stephen Satcher, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stephen D. Satcher, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Satcher v. Oddo, No. 2:14-cv-00092-JPB-RWT, 2016 WL 3637081 (N.D. W. Va. June 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED