Case ID: so2d_549/html/0799-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DANIEL, Chief Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Curtis JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 89-702.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Oct. 5, 1989.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Daniel J. Schafer, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dee R. Ball, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
   DANIEL, Chief Judge.

Appellant, Curtis Johnson, appeals his conviction and sentence for unlawful sale or delivery of a controlled substance.

We find Johnson’s appeal without merit, but remand to the trial court for the entry of a corrected judgment. Johnson was charged in count I of the information with unlawful sale or delivery of a controlled substance, section 893.13(l)(a)(l), which is a second degree felony. However, the written judgment stated that he was convicted of section “893.13(l)(a)(l), F-3.” The judgment should have read “893.13(l)(a)(l), F-2.” Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is affirmed but the case is remanded for correction of the scrivener’s error in the written judgment.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for entry of a corrected judgment.

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ„ concur.