Case ID: sw3d_463/html/0810-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Latoya CARTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    ED 100855
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    
    Filed: April 14, 2015
    Application for Transfer Denied June 30, 2015
    
      Srikant Chigurupati, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Todd T. Smith, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
    Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Latoya Carter appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b). 
      
      . All rule references aré to Mo.R. Crim.P. 2014, unless otherwise indicated.