Case ID: nd_52/html/0431-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "ChristiansoN, Ch. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GOLDEN VALLEY COUNTY, a Municipal Corporation, Respondent, v. HUGH EGAN, et al. Appellants.
    (203 N. W. 320.)
    Tixis ease is governed by the decision rendered in Golden Valley County v. Lundin, ante, 420.
    Opinion filed March 21, 1925.
    Appeal from the District Court of Golden Valley County, Pugh, J.
    Defendants appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to' the complaint.
    Affirmed.
    
      Crawford, Cain & Burnett, for appellants.
    
      H. L. Tlalliday, and Murtha & Sturgeon, for respondent.
   ChristiansoN, Ch. J.

This case was submitted witb Golden Valley County v. Lundin, ante, 420, 203 N. W. 317. Tbe question involved in the two cases are identical. And on the authority of Golden Valley County v. Lundin, supra, the order appealed from in this case is affirmed.

Birdzjgix, Nuessee, Burxe, and JohNsow, JJ. concur.