Case ID: so2d_412/html/0046-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PITTSBURGH PARTNERS, LIMITED, etc., et al., Appellants, v. ACCURATE CASH REGISTER, INC., Appellee.
    No. 81-2545.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 6, 1982.
    Burt E. Redlus, Alfred Bieley, Miami, for appellants.
    Before SCHWARTZ and NESBITT, JJ., and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Ret.), Associate Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

The default order under review was erroneously entered after an answer had been filed and is consequently reversed. Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.500(c); Board of Regents v. Hardin, 393 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Chester, Blackburn & Roder, Inc. v. Marchese, 383 So.2d 734 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Freedman v. Freedman, 235 So.2d 544 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970), cert. denied, 241 So.2d 859 (Fla.1970). 
      
      . Pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv). See Doctor’s Hospital of Hollywood, Inc. v. Madison, 411 So.2d 190 (Fla.1982).