Case ID: ark_278/html/0641-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robyn MASINGILL v. STATE of Arkansas
    CR 83-15
    648 S.W.2d 62
    Supreme Court of Arkansas
    Opinion delivered March 21, 1983
    
      Felver A. Rowell, Tom Donovan, and John Wesley Hall, Jr., for petitioner.
    
      Steve Clark, Atty. Gen., by: Victra L. Fewell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The Court of Appeals reversed appellant’s conviction of tampering with evidence. Masingill v. State, 7 Ark. App. 90, 644 S.W.2d 614 (1983). We granted the State’s petition to review that reversal. After carefully studying the issues presented and the record, we are of the view that the petition was granted under a misconception. Consequently, we dismiss the petition. As we have said, a denial of a petition for review does not imply approval or disapproval of the decision. Wilson v. City of Pine Bluff, 278 Ark. 65, 643 S.W.2d 569 (1983); Moose v. Gregory, 267 Ark. 86, 590 S.W.2d 662(1979).

Petition dismissed.