Case ID: ala-app_22/html/0493-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SAMEORD, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(117 So. 396)
    CAMPBELL v. STATE.
    (7 Div. 449.)
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    June 12, 1928.
    Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.
    Brief did not reach the Reporter.
   SAMEORD, J.

The first count, of the indictment charged that the defendant manufactured whisky. The second count that he was in the unlawful possession of a still. .The verdict of the jury was:

“We, the jury, find the defendant guilty of distilling as charged in count 2 of the indictment.”

The judgment of the court followed the verdict. The second count of the indictment did not charge “distilling” and will not support either the verdict of the jury or the judgment of the court, thereon. The orderly administration of justice requires certainty and accuracy in the rendition and recording judgments, both for the protection of the public and for the defendant. The judgmént is erroneous and is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.