Case ID: f-appx_209/html/0954-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

VISIONS EAST, INC., a Florida Corporation, John Stephen Morton, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FAGERDALA THIGER MARINE SYSTEMS, AB, a Swedish Corporation, Fagerdala World Foam, AB, a Swedish Corporation, Fagerdala USA, Inc., a Kentucky Corporation, Master Automation Group, OY, a Finnish Corporation, Tarmo Linna, Pierre Thiger, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 05-15689
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Dec. 12, 2006.
    Daniel N. Brodersen, Beusse, Brownlee, Wolter, Mora & Maire, P.A., Orlando, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    Lucinda A. Hofinann, Daniel B. Rogers, Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., Miami, FL, Leonard K. Samuels, Berger Singerman, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Holiday Hunt Russell, The Law Offices of Holiday Hunt Russell, Chartered, Hollywood, FL, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before TJOFLAT, HULL and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       Honorable Pasco M. Bowman II, United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM:

After review and oral argument, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in conducting the preliminary injunction hearing or in denying the motion for preliminary injunction.

AFFIRMED.