Case ID: so2d_795/html/0170-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

TRAVEL GUARD GROUP, INC., Appellant, v. Vincent GRUBB, Appellee.
    No. 3D01-686.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Sept. 5, 2001.
    Rehearing Denied Oct. 5, 2001.
    Quarles & Brady and Edmond E. Koes-ter (Naples); Jeffrey O. Davis and Sean M. Scullen (Milwaukee), for appellant.
    Greenspoon, Marder, Hirschfeld, Rafkin, Ross & Berger and Richard E. Epstein and Haas A. Hatic and Kenneth B. Schwartz (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and SORONDO and RAMIREZ, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We find no abuse of the trial court’s discretion in denying temporary injunctive relief for the enforcement of the terms of a non-competitive agreement. See Uro-Care, P.A. v. Montford, M.D., 775 So.2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Bradley v. Health Coalition, Inc., 687 So.2d 329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Lurton v. Muldon Motor Co., 523 So.2d 706 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); see also Kupscznk v. Blasters, Inc., 647 So.2d 888, 891 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), review denied, 658 So.2d 991 (Fla.1995); Cordis Corp. v. Prooslin, 482 So.2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

Affirmed.