Case ID: ohio-st-3d_87/html/0448-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Alice Robie Resnick, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[The State ex rel.] MTD Products, Inc., Appellee, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio; Hall, Appellant.
    [Cite as State ex rel. MTD Products, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (2000), 87 Ohio St.3d 448.]
    (No. 99-485
    Submitted November 16, 1999
    Decided January 12, 2000.)
    
      Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, L.L.P., and David J. Kovach, for appellee.
    
      Dean G. Reinhard Co., L.P.A., and Charles Zamora, for appellant.
   The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Alice Robie Resnick, J.,

dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and reinstate the order of the Industrial Commission.

Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.