Case ID: a3d_97/html/0741-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Leo E. and Sandra L. SHEDDEN, Petitioners v. ANADARKO E & P COMPANY, L.P., Respondent.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Aug. 14, 2014.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue is:

The [t]rial [c]ourt found as a matter of law that the [l]essors are estopped from denying that an oil[-]and[-]gas lease covered after-acquired oil[-]and[-]gas rights even though the [ljessee only paid the [ljessors in proportion to the [ljessors’ actual interest. Was it error for the Superior Court to affirm the [tjrial [cjourt’s grant of [sjummary [jjudgment in favor of the [ljessee and against the [ljessors?