Case ID: so2d_168/html/0314-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Petitioner, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Respondents.
    No. 33742.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Oct. 30, 1964.
    Wm. C. Blake, Jr., and Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, for petitioner.
    John McQuigg, of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos & Evans, Tampa, for Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., Li’L General Food Stores, Inc., and Mark E. Goddard, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date July 30, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been do deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.