Case ID: ny3d_12/html/0725-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[904 NE2d 495, 876 NYS2d 341]
    In the Matter of the Ancillary Receivership of Reliance Insurance Company. The Yale Club of New York City, Inc., Respondent, v Reliance Insurance Company, by the Superintendent of Insurance, as Ancillary Receiver, Appellant.
    Decided February 11, 2009
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., New York City (David B. Hamm of counsel), for appellant.
    
      Cone & Kilbourn, Mount Kisco (Joseph A. Kilbourn of counsel), for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs. Based on the arguments presented, the Appellate Division did not err in concluding that the insurance company could not rely on the August 1993 letter as the basis to avoid coverage under the claims-made policy.

Concur: Acting Chief Judge Ciparick and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.