Case ID: sw2d_787/html/0856-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re the Marriage of Edward Dean PLUNKETT, Appellant, v. Darlene Lawan PLUNKETT, a/k/a Darlene Aubuchon, Respondent.
    No. 56604.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division.
    April 3, 1990.
    Wallace L. Duncan, Grace C. Blaich, Poplar Bluff, for appellant.
    David L. Mayhugh, Flat River, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment in a motion to quash an execution and a motion for costs. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and ■restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).