Case ID: so2d_216/html/0056-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. \n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gladys CLARIDY, Appellant, v. Samuel CLARIDY, Appellee.
    No. 2299.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.
    Nov. 4, 1968.
    Rehearing Denied Dec. 16, 1968.
    William Murrell, Jr., Orlando, for appellant.
    Pearl R. Ferer, of Ferer & English, Miami, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

On the basis of the record before us, appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. Johanson v. Insua, Fla.App.1964, 161 So.2d 247.

WALDEN, C. J., REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.

PER CURIAM.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

On petition for rehearing, we have reviewed the record and the briefs and reaffirm our decision of November 4, 1968. However, by way of clarification, we would point out that although appellant may have presented as much of the record as it was possible for him to present, the record nonetheless does not show adequate ground for reversal.

Petition for rehearing is denied.