Case ID: ad_240/html/0790-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Rhodes, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Third Department,
    September, 1933.
    In the Matter of the Claim of Harold Eisenberg, Respondent, against Erie Railroad Company, Appellant. State Industrial Board, Respondent.
   Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Hill, P. J., Crapser Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Rhodes, J., dissents, with a memorandum.

Rhodes, J.

(dissenting). I dissent. The claimant worked substantially the whole of the year preceding his injury, but was a five-day worker. The wage rate should, therefore, be computed in accordance with subdivision 3 of section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (See Matter of Remmert v. Weidenmeyer, 237 App. Div. 147; affd., 262 N. Y.-.)