Case ID: nys_6/html/0957-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bartlett, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Weil.
    
      (Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.
    
    July 9, 1889.)
    Appeal from special-term, Hew York county.
    Argued before Van Brunt, P. J., and Macomber and Bartlett, JJ.
    
      Charles E. Miller, for appellants. George L. Sterliitg, for respondents.
   Bartlett, J.

This ease differs from In re Barney, ante, 401, (heard at the present term,) chiefly in the fact that no testimony has ever been taken in the proceedings, and that no order has ever been made purporting to vacate-the assessment. The conclusions reached in that matter, however, apply equally to this, and require an affirmance of the order appealed from. All concur.