Case ID: nys_92/html/1146-15.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SPROESSIG, Respondent, v. INTERURBAN ST. RY. CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    March 21, 1905.)
    Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term. Action by Charles H. Sproessig, Jr., against the Interurban Street Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for new trial on the minutes, defendant appeals. Affirmed. Bayard H. Ames and F. Angelo Gaynor, for appellant. Wager, Acker & Wager, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The question of the defendant’s negligence and the plaintiff’s freedom from negligence were fairly submitted to the jury, and there is sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict; and the judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.