Case ID: so2d_577/html/0699-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cynthia KLUTSE, Appellant, v. Harold ROSE, etc., et al., Appellees.
    No. 90-1912.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 9, 1991.
    Teresa M. Pooler, Miami, for appellant.
    Adorno & Zeder and Raoul G. Cantero, III, and Gloria L. Johnson, Coconut Grove, Carmen Dominguez Frick, Miami, for ap-pellees.
    Before BASKIN, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Based on the evidence presented, the trial court had ample basis on whiclj to conclude that the best interests of the children required denial of visitation at this time. See Adams v. Adams, 376 So.2d 1204, 1205 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert, denied, 388 So.2d 1109 (Fla.1980). The order under review is affirmed.