Case ID: nj-eq_66/html/0431-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary C. Barrett, respondent, v. The Bloomfield Savings Institution et al., appellants.
    [Argued December 3d, 1903.
    Decided February 29th, 1904.
    Filed March 1st, 1904.]
    On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Pitney, whose opinion is reported in 19 Dich. Gh. Rep. J¡25.
    
    
      Mr. Gilbert Oollins and Mr. 'Edward Oahes, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. Halsey M. Barrett, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney filed in • the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney,.Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray — -12.

For reversal — Hone.