Case ID: njl_58/html/0696-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PHILOMENA BRENNAN ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. JOHN WATSON, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiffs in error, Garret I). W. Vroorn and. William M. Banning.
    
    For the defendant in error, Symmes B. Hutchinson and Chauncy H. Beasley.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Depue, Dixon, Gummere, Mague, Yan Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Krueger. 9.

For reversal—None.