Case ID: us_469/html/0812-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "JUSTICE BRENNAN, JUSTICE MARSHALL, and JUSTICE STEVENS,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 83-6774.
    No. 83-6828.
    No. 83-6881.
    Soong v. Hofstra University. Pepper v. Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles (California, Real Party in Interest). Bradford v. Bradford.
   C. A. 2d Cir.;

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist.; and

Ct. App. D. C. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed inforina pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until October 22, 1984, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 45(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

JUSTICE BRENNAN, JUSTICE MARSHALL, and JUSTICE STEVENS,

dissenting.

For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), we would deny the petitions for writs of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motions to proceed in forma pauperis.