Case ID: so2d_942/html/0921-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David TSCHIDA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 2D06-3291.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Oct. 27, 2006.
    Rehearing Denied Nov. 30, 2006.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Burrows v. State, 890 So.2d 286 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), review denied, 914 So.2d 952 (Fla.2005); Caraballo v. State, 805 So.2d 882 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Contrary to the holding of this court in Burrows, the First District in Isaac v. State, 911 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), on collateral review applied the United States Supreme Court decision in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), retroactively to a sentence that became final before the issuance of the Blakely opinion. As this court did in Hughes v. State, 933 So.2d 1285 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006), we certify direct conflict with Isaac.

Affirmed; conflict certified.

WHATLEY, CASANUEVA, and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.