Case ID: sw2d_872/html/0528-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kathen Roy WYNNE, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.
    No. 64031.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Feb. 1, 1994.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 23, 1994.
    Application to Transfer Denied April 26, 1994.
    Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for movant-appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jennifer A. Glancy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent-respondent.
    Before CRANDALL, P.J. and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Kathen Roy Wynne, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.036 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of conviction sought to be vacated was for stealing property of a value of $150.00 or more for which movant was sentenced, as a prior and persistent offender, to imprisonment for twelve years.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).