Case ID: ny_100/html/0623-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ann Kenney, Respondent, v. The City of Cohoes, Appellant.
    (Argued October 15, 1885;
    decided October 30, 1885.)
    The question in this case was simply as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment.
    The court say: “ There were questions for the determination of the jury, and their verdict having been approved by the trial judge and the General Term we have no jurisdiction to interfere therewith. (Goodfellow v. Mayor, etc.,
      
       ; Bullock v. Mayor, etc., 99 N. Y. 654.”
    
      E. Countryman for appellant.
    
      R. A. Parmenter for respondent.
    
      
      
        Ante, p. 15.
    
   Per Curiam

mem. for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.