Case ID: so2d_481/html/0991-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Leon SOBEL, et ux., Appellants, v. Barbara S. GOLDMAN and Ivan K. Goldman, Appellees.
    No. 85-522.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Jan. 23, 1986.
    Albert C. Eaton, of Law Offices of Marvin Newman, Orlando, for appellants.
    Mark Ellis Solomon, Orlando, for appel-lees.
   PER CURIAM.

The order denying appellants’ motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum served on them is a non-final order and is not among those non-final orders which may be appealed. Fla.R.App.P. 9.130. If we treat the appeal as a petition for writ of certiora-ri, petitioners have not demonstrated any departure from the essential requirements of law, so they are not entitled to certiorari relief.

Appeal DISMISSED.

DAUKSCH, ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.