Case ID: nev_91/html/0541-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FRANK LUCKETT, Appellant, v. WARDEN, NEVADA STATE PRISON, Respondent.
    No. 8044
    September 8, 1975
    539 P.2d 1219
    
      Horace R. Goff, State Public Defender, and Michael Griffin, Deputy State Public Defender, Carson City, for Appellant.
    
      Robert List, Attorney General, and Patrick B. Walsh, Deputy Attorney General, Carson City, for Respondent.
   OPINION

Per Curiam:

Frank Luckett, convicted of grand larceny and currently incarcerated under a six-year prison term, is appealing from a district court order denying his petition for post-conviction relief.

The pertinent part of the information upon which he was convicted charged that “Luckett . . . did wilfully and unlawfully steal, take and carry away personal property, to wit: negotiable gambling chips of the value of $800.00,. ..”

His only cognizable contention below, and in this appeal, is that the information is fatally defective because it included the word “negotiable,” when in fact, gambling chips are not freely negotiable.

The contention is without merit. At most we deem the word “negotiable,” as used in the now challenged information, to be mere surplusage. See State v. Lawry, 4 Nev. 161 (1868); Nevada v. Pierce, 8 Nev. 291 (1873). If Luckett felt the word was prejudicial, his remedy was a pretrial motion to have it stricken, pursuant to NRS 173.085. See Carson v. Sheriff, 87 Nev. 357, 359, 487 P.2d 334, 335 (1971).

Affirmed.