Case ID: wash_14/html/0701-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 2110.
    Decided March 12, 1896.]
    Seattle Operating Company, Respondent, John J. Cavanaugh et al., Appellants.
    
    Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Richard Osborn, Judge.
    Affirmed.
    
      J. T. Ronald, for appellants.
    
      J. E. Lilly, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order setting aside a verdict and granting a new trial, it being contended that the granting thereof was an abuse of discretion. After an examination of the evidence we are of the opinion that such contention is not sufficiently substantiated, and the order is affirmed.