Case ID: kan_28/html/0507-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John G. Woods v. J. S. Danford, et al.
    
    March 9,1882, the judge of the district court of Sumner county, at chambers, made an order dissolving an attachment in an action wherein Woods was plaintiff and Danford and another were defendants, and also refused leave to the plaintiff to amend the affidavit therein; which rulings Woods brings here.
    
      Herrick, George & Graham, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Sterry & Sedgwick, for defendants in error.
   Per Curiam:

The same questions are involved in this case as those decided in the case of Wells, Fargo & Co. v. Danford & Smith; and in accordance with the views therein expressed, the order of the district, judge in this case must be reversed.