Case ID: ad2d_228/html/0455-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Calvin Seaya, Appellant.
    [643 NYS2d 410]
   Under the totality of the circumstances, the defendant was not denied meaningful representation by counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137; People v Castro, 211 AD2d 806; People v Hayes, 186 AD2d 268). The defendant’s sentence was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.