Case ID: so2d_696/html/0884-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "FARMER, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BURGER KING CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Frieda Arkoulis KASTOGIANIS, as Administrator of the Estate of Gus Arkoulis, Appellee.
    No. 96-0438.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    June 11, 1997.
    Rehearing and Clarification Denied July 10, 1997.
    
      Shelley H. Leinicke of Wicker, Smith, Tu-tan, O’Hara, McCoy, Graham, & Ford, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    Richard A. Kupfer of Richard A. Kupfer, P.A., and Wagner, Johnson, & McAfee, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   FARMER, Judge.

We affirm on all issues on the main appeal. In particular, we find no abuse of discretion in the grant of new trial because of erroneous instructions on the burden of proof. As to the issue on cross appeal, we expressly hold that the trial court is free in the new trial to revisit its earlier decision as to the admissibility of other acts to show foreseeability.

STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.