Case ID: sw_160/html/0071-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PRENDERGAST, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

REDO v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Oct. 15, 1913.)
    Cbiminal Law (§ 1101*) — Appeai^-Ajttemance — No Ekrob Shown.
    In the absence of a statement of facts duly signed and approved and of a bill of exceptions, a judgment of conviction will be affirmed; the motion for new trial raising no question which can be considered without a statement of facts.
    [Ed.. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. § 3204; Dec. Dig. § 1101.*]
    Appeal from District Court, Newton County; A. E. Davis, Judge.
    Ethel Thompkins Redo was convicted of burglary, and appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen.’ for the State.
   PRENDERGAST, P. J.

The appellant was convicted of burglary, and the lowest punishment fixed by law — two years in the penitentiary — was assessed.

There is no statement of facts signed by the attorneys for either side, or approved by the judge. There is no bill of exception. There is no question raised by the motion for new trial that can be considered in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.