Case ID: so2d_569/html/0526-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Isidro GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 90-1508.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 13, 1990.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Harvey J. Sepler, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Patricia Ann Ash, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before NESBITT, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Although we affirm the denial of defendant's motion to suppress, see Quevedo v. State, 554 So.2d 620 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), we remand for correction of the judgment of conviction. The judgment states that defendant entered a plea of nolo conten-dere and the court adjudicated him guilty of burglary of a conveyance, grand theft and possession of cocaine; however, the transcripts of the hearings on the motions to dismiss and to suppress reflect that the trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the burglary and grand theft charges. Upon remand the trial court should conform the judgment to its oral pronouncement.

Affirmed and remanded.