Case ID: ga-app_9/html/0396-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Powell, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

3173.
    Durden et al. v. De Loach, administrator.
    Decided June 7, 1911.
    Complaint; from city court of Swainsboro — Judge Mitchell. December 10, 1910.
    
      Saffold & Larsen, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      G. S. Jolmston, Williams & Bradley, contra.
   Powell, J.

The determination of the questions presented-depends upon a consideration of the evidence. The record contains no legal brief of the evidence, as the documents which were introduced at the trial are copied into what purports to be a brief of the evidence in extenso, and without any attempt at condensation or abridgment. Following the Uniform practice of this court and of the Supreme Court as to this, the judgment must be Affirmed.