Case ID: ohio-st-3d_132/html/0479-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State ex rel. Hart, Appellant, v. Turner, Warden, Appellee.
    [Cite as State ex rel. Hart v. Turner, 132 Ohio St.3d 479, 2012-Ohio-3305.]
    (No. 2012-0396
    Submitted July 11, 2012
    Decided July 24, 2012.)
   Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, David Hart, for a writ of habeas corpus. Hart’s speedy-trial claim is not cognizable in habeas corpus, and he had an adequate remedy by appeal from his sentencing entry to raise his claim. Tisdale v. Eberlin, 114 Ohio St.3d 201, 2007-Ohio-3833, 870 N.E.2d 1191, ¶ 7; Boles v. Knob, 130 Ohio St.3d 339, 2011-Ohio-5049, 958 N.E.2d 554, ¶ 1. Hart also waived the additional claims he raises on appeal — ineffective assistance of counsel and denial of his rights to due process and equal protection — because he failed to raise them in the court of appeals. State ex rel. Compton v. Sutula, 132 Ohio St.3d 35, 2012-Ohio-1653, 968 N.E.2d 476, ¶ 4. In addition, these claims are also not cognizable in habeas corpus, and Hart had an adequate remedy by appeal to raise them. See, e.g., Everett v. Eberlin, 114 Ohio St.3d 199, 2007-Ohio-3832, 870 N.E.2d 1190, ¶ 6 (ineffective assistance of counsel); Austin v. Sacks, 172 Ohio St. 292, 175 N.E.2d 175 (1961) (due process).

David Hart, pro se.

Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Jerri L. Fosnaught, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee, Neil Turner.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.