Case ID: ohio-st-3d_65/html/0160-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nass.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Nass (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 160.]
    (No. 92-1709 —
    Submitted October 13, 1992 —
    Decided December 9, 1992.)
    
      
      J. Warren Bettis, Disciplinary Counsel, and Harald F. Craig III, for relator.
    
      Kerry M. OBrien, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We concur in the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is, therefore, ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of one year, but we suspend imposition of this sanction on the condition stated by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.