Case ID: so3d_46/html/0120-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Wenzel BELGRAM and Gayle Belgram, Appellants, v. Scott KRUEGER and Cynthia Krueger, Appellees.
    No. 5D09-1629.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Oct. 15, 2010.
    Cesery L. Bullard, of Bullard Law, Orlando, for Appellant.
    Cynthia Krueger and Scott Krueger, Belmont, pro se Appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

We conclude, as the trial court did, that the escrow agreement entered into by the parties was clear and unambiguous. See Abis v. Tudin, D.V.M., P.A., 18 So.3d 666 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (whether ambiguity exists is question of law). Based on the undisputed facts in the record, Appellees were entitled to summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.

LAWSON, EVANDER, and COHEN, JJ., concur.