Case ID: fla-supp-2d_1/html/0073-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Before KNIGHT, SMITH & DURANT.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BHB SKYLAKE CORPORATION v. PAUL
    80-323-AP
    Circuit Court, Eleventh Circuit, Appellate Division
    August 20, 1981
    
      Rudolph F. Aragon, Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Quentel & Wolff, P.A. Miami, for appellant.
    Seymour Paul, in Proper Person, appellee.
   Before KNIGHT, SMITH & DURANT.

This appeal is from a Final Judgment in which the trial Court awarded Appellee $150.00 plus costs. On consideration of the record, briefs, and argument of counsel, we find merit in«Appellant’s contentions that an agreement for the sale of real property, which has merged into a subsequent purchase agreement, cannot be rescinded, Dix v. Dix, 191 So.205 (Fla. 1939), and that there is no requirement under Florida law that a developer build a condominium unit in accordance with its building plan unless deviations from such plan rise to the level of breach of warranties. David v. B & J Holding Corp., 349 So.2d 676 (Fla.3d DCA 1977). Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is reversed.