Case ID: misc2d_54/html/0119-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frostifresh Corporation, Appellant, v. Luis Reynoso et al., Respondents.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    May 24, 1967.
    
      
      Keilson & Keilson (Joseph Keilson of counsel), for appellant. Ira I. Van Leer for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

While the evidence clearly warrants a finding that the contract was unconscionable (Uniform Commercial Code, § 2-302), we are of the opinion that plaintiff should recover its net cost for the refrigerator-freezer, plus a reasonable profit, in addition to. trucking and service charges necessarily incurred and reasonable finance charges.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed, without costs, and a new trial ordered limited to an assessment of plaintiff’s damages and entry of judgment thereon.

Concur — Schwartzwald, Fanelli and Beckinella, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.