Case ID: f2d_851/html/1221-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Danielle FACCHINI, et al. Defendants-Appellants.
    Nos. 86-3094, 86-3097 to 86-3102, 86-3104 to 86-3111, 86-3117, 86-3118, 86-3121 to 86-3123, 86-3127 to 86-3128, 86-3137 to 86-3140, 86-3148, 86-3154, 86-3161, 86-3177.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    July 14, 1988.
    
      Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, and BROWNING, WALLACE, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
   Upon the vote of a majority of the nonre-cused active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.