Case ID: nys_155/html/1099-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CONDON, Appellant, v. AARON BUSCHBAUM CO., Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    November 26, 1915.)
    Appeal from Trial Term, New York County. Action by Mary Condon against the Aaron Buschbaum Company. From a judgment dismissing the complaint, after a trial at the Trial Term, plaintilf appeals. Reversed, and new trial ordered. Henry W. Bridges, of New York City, for appellant. Barent L. Visscher, of New York City (Barnetht Cohen, of New York City, on the brief), for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We think a question of fact was presented by the evidence, which should have been sent to the jury. The dismissal of the complaint was therefore error, and the judgment should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Order filed.

INGRAHAM, P. J., dissents.