Case ID: f-appx_170/html/0826-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Warren A. TAYLOR, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Elaine CHAO, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 05-1893.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 24, 2006.
    Decided: March 14, 2006.
    
      Warren A. Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Kristine Lynn Sendek-Smith, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Warren A. Taylor appeals the district court’s orders granting the Secretary’s motion to dismiss Taylor’s civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying reconsideration thereof. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error or abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny Taylor’s pending motions and affirm both orders on the reasoning of the district court. See Taylor v. Chao, No. CA-04-3273-PJM (D. Md. July 15 and Oct. 11, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED