Case ID: blume-sup-ct-trans_3/html/0233-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROBERT INNIS AND ROBERT GRANT versus JACOB VISGER
   Journal Entries (1822-31): Journal 3: (1) Motion for leave to enter security for costs *p. 294; (2) motion to file bond for costs nunc pro tunc granted, time given to answer *p. 375; (3) death suggested *p. 437. Journal 4: (4) Suit revived, rule to answer MS p. 54; (5) continued MS p. 72; (6) motion for hearing on bill and answer MS p. 98; (7) continued MS p. 113; (8) argument opened MS p. 283; (9) argument closed, case submitted MS p. 284; (10) argument heard, reference to master MS p. 373; (11) motion to confirm master’s report MS p. 376; (12) master’s report confirmed nisi MS p. 378; (13) motion for leave to amend answer MS p. 393; (14) decree passed nisi MS p. 404; (15) decree made absolute, signed MS p. 430.

Papers in File: [None]

Chancery Case 32 of 1822.