Case ID: sw3d_41/html/0558-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re MARRIAGE OF Carol Leigh KRAM and Kenneth Emil Kram. Carol Leigh Kram, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Kenneth Emil Kram, Respondent/Appellant.
    No. ED 77136.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Feb. 13, 2001.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 19, 2001.
    Application to Transfer Denied April 24, 2001.
    Merle L. Silverstein, Rosenblum, Gol-denhersh, Silverstein & Zafft, Clayton, for respondent.
    Allan H. Zerman, Mary E. Niemira, Zerman & Mogerman, L.L.C., Clayton, for appellant.
    Before MARY K. HOFF, KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, Sr J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his motion to modify the support and maintenance provisions of a dissolution decree. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

Husband’s motion to strike wife’s brief is denied.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).