Case ID: so2d_754/html/0742-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel F. WALSH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D99-2913.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Jan. 19, 2000.
    Rehearing Denied March 29, 2000.
    Daniel Walsh, in proper person.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Frank J. Ingrassia, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before JORGENSON, COPE and LEVY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Daniel F. Walsh appeals an order denying postconviction relief, in which he claims that he does not qualify as a habitual offender because a North Carolina conviction should not have been counted as a predicate offense. A review of this court’s records discloses that this exact claim was rejected by this court in Walsh v. State, 727 So.2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). This court’s earlier ruling is dispositive.

Affirmed.