Case ID: ny-super-ct_59/html/0592-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Felix A. Duffy, Appellant v. James H. Work, et al., as Executors, etc., Respondents.
    Decided July 2, 1891.
    Appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint entered upon the findings and decision of a judge at special term. The main question involved. was as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the plaintiffs case.
    Redfield & Redfield, for appellant.
    A. L. Pincoffs, for respondents.
    Before Freedman, Dugro and Gildersleeve, JJ..
   The Court (Dugro, J., writing, Freedman and Gildersleeve, JJ., concurring) held the evidence insufficient and affirmed the judgment, with costs. •"