Case ID: f-appx_197/html/0615-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JIANBIN WANG, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 05-76593.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 7, 2006.
    
    Decided Aug. 11, 2006.
    Jianbin Wang, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
    CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, David E. Dauenheimer, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, REINHARDT and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Respondent’s unopposed motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction in part and summarily deny it in part is granted. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.38(b) (stating that an appeal must be filed with the Board of Immigration Appeals within 30 days of the Immigration Judge’s decision); Da Cruz v. INS, 4 F.3d 721, 722 (9th Cir.1993) (holding that the time to file an appeal with the Board of Immigration Appeals is mandatory and jurisdictional).

DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.