Case ID: so2d_665/html/1152-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jack MASSENGALE, Appellant, v. Michael D. RAY, et al., Appellees.
    No. 94-2911.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Jan. 10, 1996.
    Jack Massengale, in pro per.
    Neil D. Kolner, Miami, for appellee Michael D. Ray.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and GODERICH, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Because Ray’s third-party complaint did not allege a claim for either indemnification, subrogation or contribution, the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, we reverse. See Rupp v. Philpot, 619 So.2d 1047 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).