Case ID: ga-app_28/html/0482-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Luke, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

13090.
    Moore v. Griffith.
    Decided April 13, 1922.
    Complaint; from city court of Carrollton — Judge Hood. October 29, 1921.
    
      Willis Smith, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Griffith & Matthews, contra.
   Luke, J.

The charge of the court was full and fair and adjusted to the pleadings and the evidence, the court did not err as complained of with respect to the admission and exclusion of testimony, and the evidence amply supported the verdict. For no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.