Case ID: f-appx_303/html/0453-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro PENA, a.k.a. Seal, a.k.a. Dizzy, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-50059.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 1, 2008.
    
    Filed Dec. 12, 2008.
    Scott M. Garringer, Michael J. Raphael, USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Elizabeth A. Newman, Hayne Yoon, FPDCA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: GOODWIN, CLIFTON and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). This court has rejected the argument that the supervised release condition to self-report violates a defendant’s Fifth Amendment rights. See United States v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 441 F.3d 767 (9th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is granted.

We summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.