Case ID: so2d_198/html/0649-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Earl Larry MASCAREL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 7473.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
    May 17, 1967.
    Joseph G. Spicola, Jr., Public Defender, and Richard C. Edwards, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.
    
      Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1 motion, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. We affirm the trial court on the authority of Johnson v. State of New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882 (1966), wherein the United States Supreme Court held that Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964), and Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), should not be given retroactive effect.

Affirmed.

ALLEN, C. J., and SHANNON and LILES, JJ., concur.