Case ID: f-appx_584/html/0116-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Albert Shaw NELSON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 14-6791.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 22, 2014.
    Decided: Oct. 1, 2014.
    Albert Shaw Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman, Robert Claude Jendron, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, KING, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Albert Shaw Nelson appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion to Amend Motion to Set Aside Pursuant to Rule 60, in the Alternative an Independent Action for Relief from Judgment Under Rule 60(d)(1) and (3) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Nelson, No. 5:95-cr-00333-CMC5 (D.S.C. May 8, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.