Case ID: nys_115/html/1136-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. INGRAHAM, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PARKINSON, Respondent, v. LORD’S COURT BUILDING et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    February 26, 1909.)
    Action by Charles Parkinson against the Lord’s Court Building and others. A. R. Hager, for appellants. W. C. Arnold, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order filed.

INGRAHAM, J.,

dissents, on the ground that the evidence is not sufficient to show a consent by the appellant within the lien law.