Case ID: f-appx_146/html/0215-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Juan Manuel ORTIZ-CHAVOLLA, a/k/a Juan Manuel Chavolla; et al., Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 04-50327.
    D.C. No. CR-03-01037-SJO.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted Oct. 11, 2005.
    
    Decided Oct. 18, 2005.
    Jaime Guerrero, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Nadine C. Hettle, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before NELSON, T.G., WARDLAW, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Juan Manuel Ortiz-Chavolla appeals the 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a).

Because appellant was sentenced under mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, we remand for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005) (extending Ameline’s limited remand procedure to cases involving non-constitutional error under United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)).

REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.