Case ID: f-appx_226/html/0660-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edmundo RUBI, Defendant-Appellant, and Luisa Rubi; et al., Defendants.
    No. 06-56387.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 20, 2007 .
    Filed Feb. 26, 2007.
    U.S. Atty. CAS, USSD-Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Edmundo Rubi, Taft, CA, pro se.
    Morris Sankary, Esq., Del Mar, CA, John L. Morrell, Esq., Higgs Fletcher & Mack, LLP, San Diego, CA, for Defendants.
    Before: GOODWIN, TASHIMA and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

The district court docket shows that the docketing and filing fees were paid for this appeal on September 27, 2006. Thus, no docketing and filing fees are due.

A review of the record and the response to the order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.