Case ID: f-appx_646/html/0325-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kirk L. LONEY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-7817.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 21, 2016.
    Decided: April 25, 2016.
    
      Kirk L, Loney, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Steven Dry, Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Michael Arlen Jagels, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Matthew Childs Ack-ley, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kirk L. Loney appeals from the district court’s order construing his Fed.R,Civ.P. 60(b) motion as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it on that basis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Loney, Nos. 3:02-cr-000290-REP-1; 3:11-cv-0Q337-REP (E.D.Va. Sept. 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.