Case ID: njl_124/html/0129-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RUDOLPH LINDEMANN, RESPONDENT, v. S. S. KRESGE COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Argued October 17, 1939
    Decided January 25, 1940.
    For the appellant, Edwards, Smith & Dawson.
    
    For the respondent, Collins & Corbin.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Trenchard, Donges, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 10.

For reversal—Case, Perskie, JJ. 2.