Case ID: f2d_329/html/0892-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard E. LEIGH, Appellant, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al., Appellees.
    No. 17928.
    United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 21, 1964.
    Decided Feb. 20, 1964.
    Mr. Max Frescoln, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. David C. Acheson, U. S. Atty., Frank Q. Nebeker and Gil Zimmerman, Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, submitted on the brief, for ap-pellees.
    Before Fahy, Washington and Dana-her, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Deeming the case one over which the District Court obtained jurisdiction we think the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction should not have been granted.

The order dismissing the action is reversed and the case is remanded to the-District Court for disposition by appropriate procedure.

Reversed and remanded.