Case ID: ohio-st-3d_84/html/0359-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Lundberg Stratton, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State ex rel. Fresh Mark, Inc., Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as State ex rel. Fresh Mark, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (1999), 84 Ohio.St.3d 359.]
    (No. 97-2545
    Submitted November 10, 1998
    Decided January 20, 1999.)
    
      Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, L.L.P., and Eleanor J. Tschugunov, for appellant.
    
      
      Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Vincent T. Lombardo, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.
    
      Ward, Kaps, Bainbridge, Maurer & Melvin and William J. Melvin, for appellee Ricky Cummings.
   The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I dissent and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.