Case ID: so2d_658/html/0642-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert MATOS and Teresa Matos, his Wife, Appellants, v. BUDGET RENT A CAR SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee.
    No. 95-13.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 26, 1995.
    Rehearing Denied Sept. 6, 1995.
    Neil Carver, Coral Gables, for appellants.
    Richard A. Sherman and Rosemary B. Wilder, Ligman, Martin & Evans, Ft. Lauder-dale, for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Under the clear pronouncements found in Susco Car Rental System of Florida v. Leonard, 112 So.2d 832 (Fla.1959), the summary judgment under review is reversed and the matter returned to the trial court for further proceedings which will not prevent the trial court from entertaining further motions for summary judgment if the appellee can sustain the fact that the automobile in question was subject to “a species of conversion or theft”.

Reversed and remanded.