Case ID: sw3d_318/html/0770-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bobby G. ROSS, Appellant.
    No. WD 70676.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Aug. 31, 2010.
    Nancy A. McKerrow, Esq., Columbia, MO, for appellant.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, Esq., and Mary H. Moore, Esq., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before Division Two: MARK D. PFEIFFER, P.J., and VICTOR C. HOWARD and ALOK AHUJA, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Bobby Ross appeals from his conviction after a jury trial of statutory sodomy in the first degree. § 566.062, RSMo. In his sole Point Relied On, Ross claims the trial court abused its discretion in overruling his objections to the testimony of two witnesses concerning out-of-court statements made by his minor victim, because the testimony was duplicative and improperly bolstered the victim’s testimony. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).