Case ID: so2d_332/html/0059-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FARENWALD ENTERPRISES, Appellant, v. Richard G. PECK and Valerie A. Peck, his wife, Appellees.
    No. BB-332.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    May 12, 1976.
    Edna L. Caruso of Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D’Aiuto & Dean, West Palm Beach, James M. McLean, Philip A. Webb, III, of Webb, Swain & Watson, Jacksonville, for appellant.
    J. Richard Moore of Corrigan, Werber & Moore, Jacksonville, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

Having considered the record, briefs and oral arguments of counsel, and finding that the interlocutory appeal is without substantial merit, it is dismissed pursuant to Rule 4.2c, Florida Appellate Rules. See AB CTC v. Morejon, Fla., 324 So.2d 625 (1976).

BOYER, C. J., and McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.