Case ID: nys_63/html/1112-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MEYER, Appellant, v. REIMERS et al.,Respondents.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    March 9, 1900.)
    Action by Arthur Meyer against Hermann Reimers and others. From an order denying plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of a receiver pendente lite (63 N. Y. Supp. 681), he appeals. Affirmed. B. F. Einstein, for appellant. John E. Parsons, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

On the motion for the appointment of a receiver pendente lite, it appeared that the liquidation of the assets of the firm of Reimers & Meyer was being conducted legally and in accordance with the provisions of the articles of co-partnership under which the firm was formed. We are of the opinion, therefore, that theimotion was properly denied. The consideration of the other questions discussed should be reserved until the trial of the action, The order must be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.