Case ID: f-appx_118/html/0737-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Willie McCULLOUGH, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 04-7444.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 16, 2004.
    Decided: Dec. 23, 2004.
    Willie McCullough, Appellant pro se.
    Olivia N. Hawkins, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Willie McCullough appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United, States v. McCullough, No. CR-01-231 (E.D. Va. June 15, 2004). We grant McCullough’s request to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED