Case ID: vt_98/html/0081-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Slack, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Samuel Shapiro v. Paul Whitman.
    May Term, 1924.
    Present: Watson, C. J., Powers, Taylor, Slack, and Butler, JJ.
    Opinion filed October 7, 1924.
    Action op Replevin brought under G. L. 2099. Heard on defendant’s motions to dismiss at the September Term, 1922, Windham County, Fish, J., presiding. Defendant’s motion to dismiss "writ because of non-compliance with G. L. 2108 and 2109, and as not in accordance with form prescribed by G. L. 7472, Form 12, overruled. The defendant excepted. Defendant’s motion to dismiss action for want of proper bond was granted. The -plaintiff excepted. Plaintiff also filed petition for a new trial. The opinion states the case.
    
      Reversed and remanded. Petition for new trial dismissed.
    
    
      Holden c& Healy for the plaintiff..
    
      Chase & Chase for the defendant.
   Slack, J.

This ease was heard with Shapiro v. Reed reported in the 98 Vt. 76, and presents for review the same questions there raised and considered. On the authority of that case, the instant case must go back for a new trial.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded. Petition dismissed xuithout costs to either party.