Case ID: nj-eq_88/html/0598-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edna S. Wilson et al., complainants-appellants, v. George L. Vogel, defendant-respondent.
    [Decided March 4th, 1918.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Lane, whose opinion is reported in 87 N. J. Fq. S8J/..
    
    
      Messrs. Riker & Riker, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. Arthur R. Denman, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lane.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker; Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor — 13.

For reversal — None.