Case ID: f-appx_670/html/0777-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles T. LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 16-1675
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: October 31, 2016
    Decided: November 21, 2016
    Charles T. Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Dustin Matthew Dow, John Bruce Lewis, Baker & Hostetler, LLP, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles T. Lee appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lee v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., No. 1:13-cv-00004-MR-DSC, 187 F.Supp.3d 623, 2016 WL 2746626 (W.D.N.C. May 11, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED