Case ID: or-app_188/html/0665-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

On appellant’s and respondent’s joint motion to vacate and remand dated June 19,
    joint motion for order vacating judgment granted; judgment vacated; case remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed July 16, 2003
    STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DAVID LOREN DREW, Appellant.
    
    0103-32132; A118050
    72 P3d 1064
    Jamesa J. Drake, Deputy Public Defender, and Jonathan Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, for motion.
    Before Brewer, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim and Kistler, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

The parties jointly move for an order vacating the judgment and remanding this case for resentencing. ORS 138.227(1). We grant the motion.

Defendant was convicted on three separate counts, including the unlawful use of a weapon, ORS 166.220, which is a Class C felony. Pursuant to ORS 161.610(4)(a), the trial court imposed a sentence of five years’ imprisonment and 24 months’ post-prison supervision. That sentence exceeds the statutory maximum of five years for a Class C felony because a sentence includes incarceration and post-prison supervision. Pursuant to ORS 138.222(5), the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing.

Joint motion for order vacating judgment granted; judgment vacated; case remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed. 
      
       ORS 138.227(1) provides, in part:
      “Upon joint motion of the parties to an appeal in a criminal action, the court may vacate the judgment * * * and remand the matter to the trial court to reconsider the judgment * * *. Upon remand, the trial court shall have jurisdiction to enter a revised judgment or order.”