Case ID: so2d_293/html/0120-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. McCORD, Judge", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ruth CARLYLE, Appellant, v. Robert J. CARLYLE, Appellee.
    No. R-260.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    March 19, 1974.
    Rehearing Denied May 8, 1974.
    Jon D. Caminez, Tallahassee, for appellant.
    • Charles Vocelle of Brannon, Brown, Norris, Vocelle & Haley, Lake City, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Ryan v. Ryan, 277 So.2d 266 (Fla.1973).

SPECTOR, Acting C. J., and BOYER, J., concur.

McCORD, J., concurs specially.

McCORD, Judge

(concurring specially).

Appellant contends that she was indigent and was, therefore, entitled to be furnished a free transcript of record for her appeal. Such contention is without merit since she has not shown compliance with Section 57.081, Florida Statutes, F.S. A. No opinion as to whether or not she would be entitled to a free transcript if she had complied with said statute is expressed.

As to appellant’s contention that the chancellor erred in granting dissoulution of the marriage without referring the parties for marriage counseling, appellant has not shown that the chancellor abused his discretion in such regard.

The Supreme Court has ruled contrary to appellant’s contentions that Chapter 61, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., is unconstitutional. See Ryan v. Ryan, Fla., 277 So.2d 266.