Case ID: f_158/html/1022-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES v. LA MANNA, AZEMA & FARNAN. SAME v. AUSTIN, NICHOLS & CO.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    March 10, 1908.)
    Nos. 167, 168 (4622, 4681).
    Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
    For decision below in the La Manna Case, see 154 Fed. 927.
    There was no opinion below in the Austin Case.
    D. Frank Lloyd, Asst. U. S. Atty. Hatch & Clute (Walter F. Welch, of counsel), for Austin, Nichols & Co. Brooks & Brooks (Frederick W. Brooks, of counsel), for La Manna, Azema & Farnan.
    Before LACOMBE, WARD, and NOYES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Decisions of Circuit Court affirmed.