Case ID: so2d_545/html/0308-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles L. CLEMENTS, Jr., etc., Appellant, v. SUN BANK/MIAMI, N.A., etc., Appellees.
    No. 88-981.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed April 18, 1989.
    Rehearing Denied July 5, 1989.
    Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder & Carson and G. Bart Billbrough, Miami, for appellant.
    Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Strickroot and Roger Traynor and John R. Kelso, Miami, for appellees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., BARKDULL, J., and JOHN W. DELL, Associate Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

The record presents genuine issues of material fact as to whether the appellee acted with reasonable care and expedition in undertaking a reinvestment program of trust assets as represented to the appellant. See Banfield v. Addington, 104 Fla. 661, 140 So. 893 (1932); Floyd v. Video Barn, Inc., 538 So.2d 1322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). The summary judgment under review is therefore reversed.