Case ID: wash_71/html/0697-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 10554.
    Department One.
    November 20, 1912.]
    Curtis Anderson, Respondent, v. Adna Mill Company, Appellant.
      
    
    Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lewis county,. Rice, J., entered January 22, 1912, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained by an employee in a logging camp.
    Affirmed.
    
      Reeves Aylmore, Jr., and A. A. Hull, for appellant.
    
      Forney & Ponder, for respondent.
    
      
      Reported in 127 Pac. 851.
    
   Per Curiam.

Action by Curtis Anderson against Adna Mill Company, a corporation, to recover damages for personal injuries. Prom a judgment in plaintiff’s favor, the defendant has appealed.

The respondent was injured at the same time, and in the same accident involved in the case of Cunningham, v. Adna Mill Co., ante p. 111, 127 Pac. 850. The only issues presented are issues of fact, which the jury upon sufficient evidence resolved in respondent’s favor.

The judgment is affirmed.