Case ID: cust-ct_28/html/0429-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Ford, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 56491.
    protests 889492-G and 952748-G (Seattle).
    Samuel S. Perry v. United States,
   Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of so-called “artificial gut or artificial tegusu,” in chief value of silk, the same in all material respects as the merchandise the classification of which was involved in Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. v. United States (34 C. C. P. A. 17, C. A. D. 338), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.