Case ID: so2d_778/html/0509-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "POLEN, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles M. NEY, Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION and Croom Construction Co., Appellees.
    No. 4D00-2274.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Feb. 28, 2001.
    Charles M. Ney, Vero Beach, pro se.
    John W. Kunberger, Tallahassee, for ap-pellee State of Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission.
   ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

POLEN, J.

On appellee’s motion for rehearing, we vacate our December 7, 2000, order remanding this case to the Unemployment Appeals Commission (“UAC”) for an evi-dentiary hearing to determine whether appellant timely received a copy of the UAC’s order. We, instead, dismiss this appeal without prejudice so that appellant may petition the UAC to consider vacating its original order and enter a new, appeal-able final order. See Etienne v. Simco Recycling Corp., 721 So.2d 399 (Fla. 3d DCA1998).

KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.