Case ID: ala-app_21/html/0029-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BRICKEN, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(104 So. 875)
    CLABORN v. STATE.
    (8 Div. 325.)
    (Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    June 30, 1925.)
    Criminal law <&wkey;>!090(!4, 16) — Rulings of trial court not considered, in absence of a bill of exceptions.
    Rulings on motion for new trial and in refusing written charges requested by defendant could not be considered, in absence of a bill of exceptions.
    Appeal from Circuit Court, Marshall County ; W. W. Haralson, Judge.
    Leonard Claborn was convicted of violation of the prohibition laws, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
   BRICKEN, P. J.

The indictment contained two counts. Count 1 charged that the defendant distilled, made, op manufactured alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or .mixed beverages, a part of which was alcohol. Count 2 charged in proper form and substance the unlawful possession of a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors or beverages. There was a general verdict of guilty returned against this appellant.

The record contains certain demurrers to the indictment, but no ruling of the court upon the demurrers appears, nor is there any exception to the failure or refusal of the court to rule upon the demurrers. There is nothing presented for review in this connection.

There is no bill of exceptions.' The cause is here submitted upon the record. In the absence of a hill of exception the ruling of the court upon motion for new trial cannot he considered, nor can the court’s action in refusing the several written charges requested by defendant be reviewed.

The record proper appears regular. Let the judgment appealed from stand affirmed.

Affirmed. 
      ^=oFor other cases see same topic and KEY-NTJMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes