Case ID: f-supp-2d_278/html/0053-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HORNBY, District Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNCLE HENRY’S, INC., Plaintiff v. PLAUT CONSULTING, INC., Defendant
    No. CIV. 01-180-B-H.
    United States District Court, D. Maine.
    Aug. 14, 2003.
    Stephen C. Whiting, Whiting Law Firm, P.A., Portland, ME, Edward P. Watt, Robert Bozelli, Watt & Associates, Austin, TX, for Uncle Henry’s Inc., plaintiff.
    James G. Goggin, Peter S. Black, John P. Dennis, Dale C. Kerester, Verrill & Dana, Portland, ME, for Plaut Consulting Co., Inc., defendant.
   ORDER ON POST-TRIAL MOTIONS

HORNBY, District Judge.

The defendant’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law or in the alternative to alter or amend judgment (Docket No. 169), the plaintiffs renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law (Docket No. 171), and the plaintiffs motion for a new trial (Docket No. 170) are Denied. The plaintiffs motion to alter or amend judgment (Docket No. 172) is Denied in Part in so far as the plaintiff requests relief from this Court’s prior summary judgment ruling. All of these issues have been briefed or argued abundantly already. The defendant has until August 20, 2003 to respond to the remaining portion of the plaintiffs motion to alter the judgment concerning pre- and post-judgment interest.

So Ordered.