Case ID: f-appx_145/html/0422-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wendell Edward BETANCOURT, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-6693.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 29, 2005.
    Decided Oct. 7, 2005.
    
      Wendell Edward Betancourt, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Wendell E. Betancourt appeals for the second time the district court’s December 13, 2004, order denying his motion for recusal. We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal as duplicative because this court previously disposed of his first appeal from the same order. See United States v. Betancourt, 128 Fed. Appx. 335 (4th Cir.2005) (unpublished). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED