Case ID: f-appx_45/html/0036-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frank A. PERRELLI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ZALES JEWELRY STORE CO., Defendant-Appellee.
    Docket No. 02-7343.
    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    Sept. 3, 2002.
    Frank Perrelli, East Haven, CT, pro se.
    Present CALABRESI, POOLER, and SACK, Circuit Judges.
   SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Frank Perrelli appeals the district court’s (Thompson, J.) dismissal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), of his suit against Zales Jewelry Co. (“Zales”). Mr. Perrelli claims violation of his rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Mr. Perrelli maintains that Zales had a duty to provide him with a free appraisal, which it refused to perform. We have examined the record and find that Mr. Perrelli does not allege any fact indicating that Zales’ actions were motivated by Mr. Perrelli’s asserted disability or otherwise implicating the Americans with Disabilities Act. Accordingly, Mr. Perrelli fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. While it is possible that Mr. Perrelli may have been wronged, he does not allege a wrong that has a remedy under federal law. We have considered all of Mr. Perelli’s claims and find them meritless. We therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.