Case ID: f-appx_46/html/0725-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Larry GARY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B.E. DAVID; R.L. Hopper; R.H. Sizemore; B.S. Dobbs, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 02-6840.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 19, 2002.
    Decided Sept. 27, 2002.
    Larry Gary, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Fred Thurman Hamlet, Sr., Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Larry Gary, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. In the briefing order, Gary was warned that this court would not consider issues not specifically raised in his informal brief. See Local R. 34(b). Nonetheless, Gary’s informal brief does not challenge the district court’s finding that he had filed his complaint outside the three-year limitations period, but instead addresses the merits of his claims. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.