Case ID: f-appx_234/html/0554-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Juan Carlos PEREZ-FIGUEROA, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 06-30616.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 4, 2007.
    
    Filed June 12, 2007.
    Thomas J. Hanlon, Esq., USYA—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Rebecca L. Pennell, Esq., FDWAID—Federal Defenders of Eastern Washington & Idaho, Yakima, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    
      Before: LEAVY, RYMER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Appellant challenges his sentence of twelve months imposed upon revocation of supervised release. He contends that 18 U.S.C § 3583(e) and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(b)(2) are unconstitutional because they permit punishment for a supervised release violation without a jury verdict in violation of the Sixth Amendment holdings in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). We, however, rejected this argument in United States v. Huerta-Pimental, 445 F.3d 1220, 1225 (9th Cir.2006), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 127 S.Ct. 545, 166 L.Ed.2d 403 (2006). Accordingly, the government’s unopposed motion for summary affirmance of the district court’s judgment is granted.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.