Case ID: f-appx_668/html/0474-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dontay CARTER-EL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Scott S. OAKLEY; Robin Woolford; Lenora Adegbesan; Paula Williams; Warden Frank Bishop; Lt. Brad Wilt; Warden Richard Graham, Jr.; James Tichnell, Case Manager; Capt. Butler, Investigations, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 16-6093
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: August 25, 2016
    Decided: August 29, 2016
    Dontay Carter-El, Appellant Pro Se. Ankush Nayar, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dontay Carter-El appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carter-El v. Oakley, 1:14-cv-02545-JFM, 2015 WL 7012708 (D. Md. filed Nov. 10, 2015 & entered Nov. 12, 2015; filed Jan. 11, 2016 & entered Jan. 12,2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED