Case ID: nys_143/html/1107-13.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BRILL, Appellant, v. HODGENS, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    October 17, 1913.)
    Actiàu by Raphael Brill against Thomas M. Hodgens. A. Benedict, of New York City, for appellant. A. B. King, of New York City, for respondent.
   No opinion. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion to vacate order for examination denied, with $10 costs, the date for the examination of defendant to be fixed on settlement of order. Settle order on notice.