Case ID: ct-intl-trade_17/html/0915-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Restani, Judge:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Floral Trade Council, plaintiff v. United States, defendant, and Visaflor, S.A., Rancho Daisy, Rancho Guacatay, and Rancho Mision el Descanso, defendant-intervenors
    Court No. 92-06-00393
    (Dated August 16, 1993)
   JUDGMENT

Restani, Judge:

This case having been submitted for decision and the Court, after deliberation, having rendered a decision therein; now, in conformity with that decision,

It is hereby ordered : that a remand determination having been issued finding the “all other” rate to be 18.20%, and no objections having been filed, it is hereby

Further ordered that the ITA’s remand determination is sustained and that an 18.20% rate shall be applied as the cash deposit “all other” rate for future entries.