Case ID: nc_168/html/0081-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Peb Oueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

W. E. GREGORY v. J. R. WALLACE.
    (Filed 16 September, 1914.)
    Trials — Instructions—Issues of Fact.
    Tbis case involves only an issue of fact as to the location of a boundary line between tbe parties from a fixed point given in the deed, and the instructions being correct, no error found.
    Appeal by plaintiff from Ferguson, J., at March Term, 1914, of Cue-RETOOK.
    Civil action, tried upon these issues:
    1. Did the defendant enter and trespass on the lands of the plaintiff, as alleged? Answer; “No.”
    2. What damages, if any, has the plaintiff sustained thereby?
    The plaintiff appealed.
    
      Aydlett & Simpson for plaintiff.
    
    
      Ward & Thompson for defendant.
    
   Peb Oueiam.

• The defendant admitted the ownership of the land to be in plaintiff,- but denied any trespass. So that the only issue was the location of plaintiff’s boundary line, and to determine the location of plaintiff’s boundary line it became necessary, on the trial, to locate a certain gum on the east side of the landing field, which was the gum described in the aforesaid deed, from which the line is to run south 45 degrees east to a navigable water-course.

This involves exclusively a question of fact and was submitted to the jury in a charge free from error.

We have examined the six exceptions to evidence and find them to be without merit.

No error.