Case ID: sw2d_789/html/0895-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Betty L. DEAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Duane BENTON, Director of Revenue, Respondent-Respondent.
    No. 57204.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    June 5, 1990.
    Charles A. Hurth, III, Pacific, for appellant.
    Duke A. McDonald, Asst. Pros. Atty., Union, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Driver appeals from the denial of her petition for review of an administrative revocation of her driver’s license based on her refusal to submit to a chemical blood analysis. We affirm. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).