Case ID: so2d_441/html/1146-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marvin A.H. FREIMAN, Appellant, v. Jay HIRSCH, Appellee.
    No. 83-837.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 15, 1983.
    Myers, Kenin, Levinson, Ruffner, Frank & Richards and Terry V. Percy, Miami, for appellant.
    No appearance for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARK-DULL and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The complaint does not allege a basis for subjecting the defendant-appellant Marvin A.H. Freiman, a New York attorney, to service under the Florida long-arm statute, and his unrebutted affidavit affirmatively shows that no such basis exists. Investors Associates, Inc. v. Moss, 441 So.2d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Hyco Manufacturing Co. v. Rotex International Corp., 355 So.2d 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Nichols v. Seabreeze Properties, Inc., 302 So.2d 139 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). The order denying his motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over his person is therefore reversed.