Case ID: sw3d_540/html/0410-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN the INTEREST OF: A.W.:
    Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. C.J.W., IV (Father), Appellant.
    WD 80834
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    FILED: February 20, 2018
    Daniel C. Berezoski, Michael T. Raupp, Sierra J. Faler, Kansas City, for appellant.
    Michael A. Herrin, Lori A. Fluegel, Kansas City for respondent.
    Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judges
    ORDER
   Per Curiam

C.J.W. appeals from the circuit court's judgment terminating his parental rights to his daughter, A.W. He contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the grounds for termination and the best interest findings. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)