Case ID: nj-eq_26/html/0295-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "The Chancellor.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The Morris and Essex Railroad Company and The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company vs. Haskins and The Hudson Tunnel Railroad Company.
    The right to tlie injunction which issued on filing the bill depending upon questions, some of which are new and eminently proper to be decided by a court of law, and are awaiting adjudication in such tribunal between the same parties ; motion to dissolve denied.
    On motion to dissolve injunction, on bill and affidavits annexed.
    
      Mr. 11. S. White and Mr. I>. Willhiwson, for the motion.
    . J. Vanatta, contra.
   The Chancellor.

Home of the questions presented by the bill, and on the decision of which the complainants’ claim to relief depends, are new questions of a very important character, and eminently proper to be decided by a court of law. They will probably come up for adjudication before the Court of Errors, at its next term, in proceedings pending in that court between these parties. I deem it proper to await the action of that court in the premises. The present motion will, therefore, be denied, but without costs.