Case ID: ad3d_69/html/0863-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Vilma Serra, Petitioner, v Edwin Benitez, Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Edwin Benitez, Respondent, v Vilma Serra, Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)
    [891 NYS2d 912]
   “The extent to which the noncustodial parent may exercise parenting time is a matter committed to the sound discretion of the hearing court, to be determined on the basis of the best interests of the child” (Chamberlain v Chamberlain, 24 AD3d 589, 592 [2005]). The Family Court’s determination regarding visitation was not an improvident exercise of its discretion (cf. Chamberlain v Chamberlain, 24 AD3d at 592). Covello, J.E, Angiolillo, Balkin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.