Case ID: ohio-st-3d_75/html/0412-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Clark, Appellant.
    [Cite as State v. Clark (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 412.]
    (No. 95-2332
    Submitted February 20, 1996
    Decided April 10, 1996.)
    
      
      Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Karen L. Johnson, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
    
      Lamont Clark, pro se.
    
   Per Curiam.

We affirm the decision of the court of appeals based upon appellant’s failure to demonstrate a genuine issue as to whether his appellate counsel provided constitutionally adequate representation.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Wright, J., not participating.