Case ID: pa_636/html/0390-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

143 A.3d 889
    THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS, INC., Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, BUREAU OF LABOR LAW COMPLIANCE, Respondent Elizabeth Haubrich, Intervenor.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Aug. 2, 2016.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner is:

(1) Whether the Pennsylvania Personnel File Act [43 P.S. §§ 1321-24]’s definition of “current employee” means former employee, as was held by the Commonwealth Court in this case when it erroneously relied on nonpre-cedential dieta in an earlier Commonwealth Court decision (Beitman v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 675 A.2d 1300 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996))?