Case ID: ohio-st-3d_138/html/0083-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State ex rel. Ullmann v. JobsOhio et al.
    [Cite as State ex rel. Ullmann v. JobsOhio, 138 Ohio St.3d 83, 2013-Ohio-5188.]
    (No. 2013-1268
    Submitted October 22, 2013
    Decided December 3, 2013.)
    Victoria E. Ullmann, pro se.
    Squire Sanders, L.L.P., and Aneca E. Lasley; and Organ, Cole & Stock, L.L.P., and Douglas R. Cole, for respondents JobsOhio and John Minor.
   {¶ 1} This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.

{¶ 2} Upon consideration of respondents’ motion to dismiss, it is ordered by the court that the motion to dismiss is granted because JobsOhio is specifically exempted from the requirements of R.C. 149.43 by R.C. 187.04(C)(1). Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

O’Donnell, J., not participating.