Case ID: f-appx_590/html/0272-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Doyle R. HAM, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; Dayena Corcoren; John Wolfe; John Lottich; Gary Maynard; Paula Green-Holt; Cynthia Briscoe; Bruce Chapman; Brenda Shell-Eleazer; Rodney Burger; Margaret Chippendale; Brian Kauffman, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 14-1779.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 22, 2015.
    Decided: Jan. 26, 2015.
    Doyle R. Ham, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Judith Ann Barr, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Doyle R. Ham, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ham v. Dep’t of Pub. Safety & Corr. Servs., No. 1:13-cv-03501-JKB (D.Md. filed July 10, 2014 & entered July 11, 2014). We also deny Ham’s motion for injunctive relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.