Case ID: cust-ct_6/html/0929-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, Judge:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mamary Bros. v. United States
    No. 5236.
    Entry No. 716729 and 45824.
    Invoices dated Swatow, China, June 26 and August 7, 1936.
    Entered at New York August 10 and September 21, 1936.
    (Decided April 25, 1941)
    
      Lane' & Wallace for the plaintiffs.
    
      Charles D. Lawrence, Acting Assistant Attorney General (Daniel I. Auster, special attorney), for the defendant.
   Tilson, Judge:

The two appeals listed above have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the issue herein is the same as the issue in United States v. Kohlberg, C. A. D. 88; that the market value or price at or about the dates of exportation at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of China, for export to the United States, in usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including all costs, charges, and expenses specified in section 402 (d) of the act of 1930, is the appraised value, less any amount added under duress, and that there was not any higher foreign value.

On the agreed facts I find and hold the proper dutiable export value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser, less any amount added under duress. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.