Case ID: ala-app_23/html/0613-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SAMFORD, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(123 So. 924)
    Joe BYRD v. STATE.
    (8 Div. 894.)
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    June 25, 1929.
    Nathan, Nathan & Nathan, of Sheffield, for appellant.
    Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.
   SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted on a charge of unlawfully possessing a still. The corpus delicti was proven, but there is no evidence connecting this defendant with the possession of the still. The defendant was entitled to the general affirmative charge. Clark v. State, 18 Ala. App. 217, 90 So. 16; Koonce v. State, 18 Ala. App. 438, 93 So. 214; Knight v. State, 19 Ala. App. 296, 97 So. 163.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.