Case ID: wis_253/html/0629-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Fairchild, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Halvorson, Appellant, vs. Connors, Respondent.
    
      October 12
    
    November 16, 1948.
    
    For the appellant there was a brief by Doar & Knowles of New Richmond, and oral argument by W. T. Doar.
    
    
      Earl Nelton of Balsam Lake, for the respondent.
   Fairchild, J.

The members of the court are equally divided upon this appeal. Mr. Justice Wickhem, Mr. Justice Hughes, and Mr. Justice Martin are of the opinion that' a new trial should be granted. Mr. Chief Justice Rosenberry, Mr. Justice Fritz, and the writer are of the opinion that the order should be reversed and judgment entered for plaintiff.

Under the rule the order appealed from is affirmed.

By the Court. — Order affirmed.

Broadfoot, J., took no part.