Case ID: sw3d_510/html/0348-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Matthew B. RANDOLPH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    ED 104224
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    Filed: September 27, 2016
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied October 26, 2016
    Application for Transfer Denied February 28, 2017
    Matthew B. Randolph, Cameron, MO, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before: James M. Dowd, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Matthew B. Randolph appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying without an evidentiary hearing his motion for leave to file his 2012 Rule 29.15 for post-conviction relief out of time. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2016).