Case ID: njl_107/html/0516-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PAUL BENCSKO, RESPONDENT, v. CAESAR A. CANNARA, APPELLANT.
    Submitted October 31, 1930
    Decided February 2, 1931.
    For the respondent, John W. Palmer.
    
    For the appellant, Stein, McGlynn & Hannoch.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Trehchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Bodijste, Daly, Dohges, Yah Buskibk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.