Case ID: ohio-st-3d_106/html/0430-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Seaford et al., Appellees, v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Appellant.
    [Cite as Seaford v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 106 Ohio St.3d 430, 2005-Ohio-5407.]
    (No. 2005-0172
    — Submitted August 23, 2005
    — Decided October 26, 2005.)
    Brent Coon & Associates, Christopher J. Hickey, and Mary Brigid Sweeney; Kevin E. McDermott, for appellees.
    Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, Kevin C. Alexandersen, Monica A. Sansalone, and Holly M. Olarczuk-Smith, for appellant.
   {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals on the issue raised in appellant’s Proposition of Law No. IV is reversed on the authority of Hess v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 106 Ohio St.3d 389, 2005-Ohio-5408, 835 N.E.2d 679, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for application of Hess.

Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., and Lanzinger, J., dissent.