Case ID: or-app_8/html/0570-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PEE CUEIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued February 24,
    affirmed March 30, 1972
    CHIMENTI, Respondent, v. CHIMENTI, Appellant.
    
    (No. D-2855)
    494 P2d 904
    
      Harry F. Samuels, Portland, argned the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Vergeer, Samuels, Eoehr & Sweek, Portland.
    
      DeMar L. Batchelor, Hillsboro, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Schwenn, Bradley, Batchelor & Bailey, Hillsboro.
    Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Langtry and Foley, Judges.
   PEE CUEIAM.

This is an appeal from only that portion of a divorce decree which made division of the property between the parties. We have examined the record in our de novo review and conclude that a recitation of the facts of the property division will serve no purpose. It is sufficient to say we cannot disagree with the division made by the trial court.

Affirmed.