Case ID: a2d_665/html/1160-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kathleen M. BYRNES, Appellee, v. Harry D. CALDWELL, Appellant.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Argued Sept. 21, 1995.
    Decided Oct. 10, 1995.
    Francis Recchuiti, Morristown, for H. Caldwell.
    
      Peter E. Moore, Morristown, for K. Byrnes.
    Albert J. Momjian, Philadelphia, PA, Ami-cus.
    Before NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE and MONTEMURO, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Order of the Superior Court is reversed. See Curtis v. Kline, No. 6 Eastern District Appeal Docket 1994, — Pa. -, 666 A.2d 265 (1995).

MONTEMURO , J., joined by CAPPY, J., dissents based on his Dissenting Opinion in Curtis v. Kline, noting in addition “we are cognizant of the issue of retroactivity, but because the majority has declared the Act unconstitutional, this issue is moot.” 
      
       MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.