Case ID: ny_84/html/0668-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per curiam\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harvey J. King, Respondent, v. Oscar B. Arnold, Appellant.
    (Argued March 1, 1881;
    decided March 22, 1881.)
    This was an appeal from order of General Term, affirming an order which denied a motion to vacate an order of arrest herein.
    The motion was made upon the same papers on which the order of arrest was granted.
    
      The court say:
    
      “ 1. The complaint contains causes of action which authorize an arrest under subdivision 8 of section 550 of the Code.
    “ 2. The facts positively stated in the complaint and affidavit are sufficient to sustain the order of arrest. They were sufficient to give the county judge jurisdiction to grant the order; and with the exercise of his discretion we cannot interfere.”
    
      J. W. Palmer for appellant.
    
      LaMott W. Rhodes for respondent.
   Per curiam

opinion for affirmance.

All concur.

Order affirmed.