Case ID: misc2d_134/html/0021-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

200 Prince Realty, Appellant, v Seth D. Greenberg, Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    November 19, 1986
    APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Robert M. Olshever and Elliot L. Evans for appellant. Ellen Sackstein for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order entered October 10, 1985 affirmed, with $10 costs, for the reasons stated in that part of the opinion below which holds that respondent Greenberg is entitled to a renewal lease because petitioner’s predecessor knowingly and voluntarily accepted respondent as a successor rent-stabilized tenant in the subject premises.

Hughes, P. J., Riccobono and Parness, JJ., concur.