Case ID: va_14/html/0954-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rose v. King.
    September Term, 1809.
    Special Demurrer— Ameudment — Costs. — After special demurrer to a bill, the plaintiff may have leave to amend, on payment of costs.
    
      
      Demurrers. — See monographic note on “Demurrers” appended to Com. v. Jackson, 2 Va. Cas. 50!.
    
    
      
       Amended Bills, — See monographic note on “Amended Bills” appended to Belton v. Apperson, 26 Gratt. 20T.
    
    
      
       Costs. — See monographic note on “Costs” appended to Jones v. Tatum, 19 Gratt. 720.
    
   To the bill in this case there was a special demurrer, which the Court inclined to consider as sufficient, and the plaintiff moved for leave to amend his bill in order to remove the objection, to which the Chancellor said there could be no objection, upon paying of costs; and so it was ordered accordingly.