Case ID: ny-super-ct_54/html/0555-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William M. Keeler, Appellant, v. Barrett’s, Palmer & Heal Dyeing Establishment, Respondent.
    Decided December 30, 1886.
    Appeal from judgment entered in favor of the defendant upon the verdict of a jury. S. F. Kneeland, for appellant. Taylor & Ferris, for respondent. Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Freedman^.
   Per Curiam.

“The appeal being from the judgment only, and no appeal having been taken from the denial of the motion for a new trial, the verdict of the jury must stand as conclusive upon the questions of fact sought to be raised by the points submitted on behalf of the appellant. Judgment affirmed, with costs.”