Case ID: so2d_624/html/0852-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jack TAUB, Appellant, v. Patricia Ann TAUB, Appellee.
    No. 93-735.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 5, 1993.
    Ruden, Barnett, MeClosky, Smith, Schus-ter & Russell and Nancy W. Gregoire and Gill S. Freeman and Edward A. Licitra, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    Solms & Price and Elizabeth Baker, Miami, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and COPE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We agree with the appellant ex-husband that, under the terms of the parties’ property settlement agreement, the partial liquidation of the fund in question did not trigger the appellee ex-wife’s right to her distributive share of the entire fund. The order under review, which reflects the trial court’s contrary conclusion, is therefore vacated without prejudice to the entry of a judgment reflecting the appellee’s entitlement to her share of the proceeds of a liquidation of the entire fund.

Vacated with directions. 
      
      . Some $300,000.00 of the approximately $1,000,000.00 fund was "liquidated” in the transaction at issue in this case. Under the agreement, however, the husband was to receive the first $483,000.00 of the proceeds of a complete liquidation, with only the remainder split between the parties.