Case ID: sadler_1/html/0391-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edwin O. Michener, Assignee, Plff. in Err., v. John G. Michener et ux.
    Evidence held insufficient to rebut presumption oí payment.
    (Decided January 25, 1886.)
    Error to the Common Pleas, No. 1, of Philadelphia County to review a judgment for defendants in á scire facias to renew a mortgage.
    Affirmed.
    
      Hunn Hanson for plaintiff in error.
    
      8. Ar. llich for defendants in error.
    Cited in Gregory v. Com. 121 Pa. 611, 624, 6 Am. St. Rep. 804, 15 Atl. 452.
   Per Curiam:

There was no error in rejecting the evidence. It was wholly insufficient to rebut the presumption of payment. It indicates a desire to have the mortgage satisfied of record, but not an admission that it was unpaid. We discover no error in the charge, nor in directing the jury to render a verdict in favor of the defendants. The other specifications of error have no merit.

Judgment affirmed.