Case ID: f-appx_17/html/0122-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Raymond L. EDWARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WHITMAN REQUARDT & ASSOCIATES, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 01-1177.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted July 31, 2001.
    Decided Aug. 21, 2001.
    David A. Branch, Law Offices of David A. Branch, P.C., Washington, DC, for appellant.
    Charles R. Bacharach, Gordon, Fein-blatt, Rothman, Hoffberger & Hollander, L.L.C., Baltimore, MD, for appellee.
    Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Raymond L. Edwards appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendant on Edwards’ employment discrimination and related state law claims. Our review of the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Edwards v. Whitman Requardt & Assoc., No. CA-00-1834-S (D.Md. Jan. 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.