Case ID: so3d_263/html/0252-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Amarti MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-371
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Opinion filed January 25, 2019
    James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kathryn Rollison Radtke, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
    Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
    CORRECTED
   PER CURIAM.

Amarti Mitchell appeals the judgment and sentence imposed upon him after the trial court found he violated condition five of his order of probation for committing a new law violation. We affirm but remand solely for entry of a proper order revoking probation. See Dolinger v. State, 779 So.2d 419, 421 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (determining trial court erred by failing to enter a written revocation order and remanding for entry of said order); see also Green v. State, 23 So.3d 820, 821 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (remanding for entry of a written order revoking probation where record clearly showed the trial court had revoked appellant's probation).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for entry of revocation order.

ORFINGER and BERGER, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.