Case ID: f-appx_205/html/0753-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William J. ABRACZINSKAS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-12811
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Nov. 8, 2006.
    Nancy J. Hess, United States Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    William J. Abraczinskas, Miami, FL, pro se.
    Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Spyro Theodore Kypreos, appointed counsel for William J. Abraczinskas on this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Abraczinskas’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.