Case ID: njl_58/html/0409-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HENRY SUTCLIFFE ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. W. H. HUMPHREYS, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Supreme Court, see ante p. 42.
    For the plaintiff in error, Lewis Starr.
    
    For the defendant in error, Thomas B. ¡Tarried.
    
   Per Curiam.

The opinion below is affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief .Justice, Depue, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Brown, Krueger, Sims, Smith, Talman. 11.

For reversal—None.