Case ID: f2d_453/html/1364-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Angel AVILA-DIAZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 71-2262
    Summary Calendar.
    
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Dec. 27, 1971.
    Before THORNBERRY, MORGAN and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      
         Rule 18, 5 Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.
    
   PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 
      
      . In his motion to vacate judgment and sentence filed in the District Court the appellant challenges the validity of his guilty plea on grounds that: (1) he did not understand the proceedings against him because he was unable to speak or comprehend the English language; (2) his plea of guilty was not freely or voluntarily entered, but was entered on counsel’s promise that he would receive only a two-year sentence; and (3) counsel rendered ineffective service by assuring him of false consequences of the plea.
     
      
      . See N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.