Case ID: so2d_214/html/0724-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CONCREFORM COMPANY, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v. John VAN DORN et al., Respondents.
    No. 37543.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Oct. 9, 1968.
    Rose & Marlow, Miami, for petitioners.
    Jules R. Israel, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lake-land, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 26, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

Accordingly, the petition for certorari is denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.