Case ID: sw3d_409/html/0580-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Brian S. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 75260.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Sept. 24, 2013.
    Laura G. Martin, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
    Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before Division Three: LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Presiding Judge, MARK D. PFEIFFER and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judges.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Brian Wright appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, after he was convicted of sexual abuse and false imprisonment. Wright contends the motion court clearly erred in denying post-conviction relief because defense counsel was ineffective for failing to present evidence that would have aided his credibility and provided him with a viable defense. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).