Case ID: f-appx_112/html/0302-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Belton HARRIS, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 04-6277.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted April 15, 2004.
    Decided Nov. 9, 2004.
    
      Belton Harris, Jr., Appellant pro se. Stacey Denise Haynes, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM.

Belton Harris, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) and his motion for reconsideration of that order. We have independently reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We therefore affirm both orders on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Harris, Nos. CR-99-1055; CA-03-82 (D.S.C. filed Aug. 18, 2003, and entered Aug. 19,2003; filed Jan. 9, 2004, and entered Jan. 12, 2004). We deny Harris’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.