Case ID: ohio-law-abs_2/html/0539-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MARX, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 542
    VANGEROVSKY v. ZETER
    Cincinnnati Superior Court
    No. 68961.
    Decided May 17, 1924
    297. CONTRACTS — Purchaser of real estate not compelled to accept deed and warranty, from an undisclosed principal.
    Attorneys — H. P. Karch, for Vangerovsky; Charles H. Hoffmeister, for Zeter; both of Cincinnati.
   MARX, J.

Epitomized Opinion

In memorandum of opinion held that a party having contracted to purchase real '.estate from a definitely named party cannot be forced to accept the deed of conveyance and warranties of ah unnamed and undisclosed principal,. with whom the buyer did not contract. Motion for new trial overruled.