Case ID: nj-eq_119/html/0530-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Antonio Pitroni et ux., et al., complainants-respondents, v. Joseph D. Giacomo et al., defendants-appellants.
    [Argued October 17th, 1935.
    Decided January 31st, 1936.]
    
      
      Mr. Emerson L. Richards, for the appellants.
    
      Messrs. Bleakley, Stockwell & Burling, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Sooy.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Lloyd, Bodine, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, JJ. 7.

For reversal—Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Rafferty, JJ. 5.