Case ID: so2d_858/html/0371-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. GREEN, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel G. JONES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 3D02-3086, 3D03-2092.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 5, 2003.
    Daniel G. Jones, in proper person.
    Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Erin K. Zack and Meredith L. Balo, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GREEN, and WELLS, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Franklin, 836 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA)(en banc), review granted, Nos. SC03-413, 03-532, 854 So.2d 659 (Fla. Sept.19, 2003). Conflict is certified with Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla.2002).

GREEN, J.

(specially concurring).

The doctrine of stare decisis compels me to join in the affirmance of this cause, but I continue to adhere to the view that Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), review dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla.2002), was correct in its conclusion that Chapter Law 99-188, Laws of Florida, violates the single subject rule of the Florida Constitution.