Case ID: pa-super_218/html/0140-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam, Montgomery, J.:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Krissinger v. Krissinger, Appellant.
    Argued May 19, 1971.
    Before Weight, P. J., Watkins, Montgomeby, Jacobs, Spaulding, and Cebcone, JJ. (Hoffman, J., absent).
    
      
      Fronefield Crawford, with him Sondra K. Slade, Fronefield Crawford, Jr., and Crawford, Frasier & Diamond, for appellant.
    
      Arthur Levy, with him Levy and Levy, for appellee.
    May 20, 1971:
   Opinion

Pee Curiam,

Decree affirmed. Having made an independent study of the entire record we are of the opinion that the court below properly granted a decree in divorce in this case.

Dissenting Opinion by

Montgomery, J.:

My examination of this record convinces me that the appellee, husband, was far from being a paragon of virtue. His actions toward his wife contributed materially to her downfall. For that reason, he was not an injured and innocent libellant to entitle him to a divorce.

Therefore, I respectfully dissent.