Case ID: f-appx_6/html/0189-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rodrick B. CHATMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sam McVEY, Detective; Gregory Baker, Detective, Defendants-Appellees, and Warden of Greensville Correctional Center; The City of Bristol, Virginia; Delaware County, Pennsylvania; Bristol City Jail; Powhatan Reception & Classification Center; Bristol, Virginia Sheriff's Department; Stafford County Sheriff's Department; Bristol Police Department; Tinicum Police Department; George M. Warren, Jr., Esquire; Beverly Haney, Esquire; William H. Ryan, Jr., Esquire; Wayne Punshon, Esquire; John F.X. Riley, Esquire; Robert T. Lythegoe, Chief of Police For Tinicum; John A. Doe, Officer; John B. Doe, Officer; John C. Doe, Officer; John D. Doe, Officer; Gray Robinson, Esquire; Darrell Poe, Esquire; Jackson & Robinson; Bradford & Poe; Daniel Finnegan, Esquire; Patrick J. Conner, Esquire; Denise M. Conrad; Patricia Johnson, Esquire; John W. Person, Esquire; Attorney General of Virginia; Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; Stafford County Sheriff's Department; The City of Bristol, Virginia, Defendants.
    No. 00-7385.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted March 22, 2001.
    Decided March 28, 2001.
    
      Rodrick B. Chatman, pro se. Steven Ray Minor, Elliott, Lawson & Pomrenke, Bristol, VA, for appellees.
    Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Rodrick Bernard Chatman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for civil or criminal contempt. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Chatman v. McVey, No. CA-95-1285-7 (W.D.Va. Sept 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.