Case ID: liquor-tax-rep_3/html/0093-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "McCall, J.:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Supreme Court, New York Special Term.
    Reported. N. Y. L. J.r
    March 5, 1903.
    In the Matter of the Application of Martin Armstrong to Revoke the Liquor Tax Certificate of Martin Anderson.
    
      Joseph P. Joachvmsen, for petitioner.
   McCall, J.:

In this matter I am not at all satisfied that the service made was a proper service but eliminating that feature, the essential requirement of the written consent of the State Commissioner of Excise, as provided for in subdivision 2 of section 28 of the Liquor Tax Law is lacking and upon that ground, if no other, the motion is denied with leave to renew.