Case ID: so2d_559/html/0384-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alan Ira KARTEN, Appellant, v. Albert KENT and Patricia Kent, Appellees.
    No. 89-1054.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 10, 1990.
    Paul Moms, Coral Gables, for appellant.
    Young, Stern & Tannenbaum, North Miami Beach, and Andrew S. Berman, for ap-pellees.
    Before HUBBART, COPE and LEVY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant Alan Karten, defendant below, appeals a final judgment against him on a claim for conversion. We conclude that the law of conversion was correctly applied, Senfeld v. Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Co., 450 So.2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); that Paul Kent was not an indispensable party, W.R. Cooper, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 512 So.2d 324 (Pla. 3d DCA 1987); and that no reversible error has been shown with respect to the evidentiary rulings.

Affirmed.