Case ID: so2d_405/html/1079-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Warren Edward HULL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 81-881.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Nov. 18, 1981.
    Jerry Hill, Public Defender, and William H. Pasch, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David T. Weisbrod, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence. However, we remand for clarification of the order relating to the trial judge’s statement that he retain jurisdiction for armed robbery, inasmuch he did not state with individual particularity the basis for retaining such jurisdiction as required by section 947.-16(3), Florida Statutes (1979).

SCHEB, C. J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.