Case ID: nys_35/html/1117-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "FITZSIMONS, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SHAW, Respondent, v. TABERNICKLE BAPTIST CHURCH, Appellant.
    (City Court of New York, General Term.
    October 29, 1895.)
    Action hy Thomas Shaw against Tabernickle Baptist Church.
    R. M. Williams, for appellant. Thornall & Pierce, for respondent.
   FITZSIMONS, J.

As it appears to us, only questions of fact were involved in this action. All of them were properly submitted to the jury, and duly passed upon by them, adversely to the defendant. No meritorious question of law is presented by the appeal book, in our opinion. The judgment is therefore affirmed, with costs. All concur.