Case ID: f-cas_26/html/1137-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "CRANCH, Chief Judge, and DUCKETT, Circuit Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Case No. 15,703.
    UNITED STATES v. McPHERSON.
    [1 Cranch, C. C. 517.] 
    
    Circuit Court, District of Columbia.
    Dec. Term, 1808.
    Jury—Peremptory Challenge.
    Peremptory challenge not allowed in cases of larceny.
    Indictment [against Daniel M’Pherson] for stealing, under the act of congress of April 30, 1790, § 16 (1 Stat. 116).
    It was conceded by Mr. Morsell, for the prisoner, that he had not a right to peremptory challenge.
    
      
       [Reported by Hon. William Craneh. Chief Judge.]
    
   CRANCH, Chief Judge, and DUCKETT, Circuit Judge,

were of opinion, but did not deliver it, that the prisoner was not entitled to a peremptory challenge. In the case of U. S. v. Carrigo [Case No. 14,735], at Alexandria, in January, 1802, it was refused by the court Upon examining W. Craneh’s notes in Washington, he could find no case in which it had been allowed in Washington. It has been lately allowed in Alexandria, by the assent of the attorney for the United States. • It was never allowed in Mr Mason’s time.