Case ID: sw3d_41/html/0554-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael MILLER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 77600.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Pour.
    Jan. 23, 2001.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 12, 2001.
    Application to Transfer Denied April 24, 2001.
    Mark A. Grothoff, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondents.
    Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Miller (“Movant”) appeals from a judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b). 
      
      . All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2000, unless otherwise indicated.