Case ID: pa-super_228/html/0880-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam :", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Commonwealth, Appellant, v. Davis.
    Argued March 28, 1974.
    
      David Rich-mam, Assistant District Attorney, with him Ma/rk Bend-row, Assistant District Attorney, Richard A. Sprague, First Assistant District Attorney, and F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellant; Joseph V. Restifo, for appellee.
   Opinion

Per Curiam :

The order of the court below granting a new trial solely to enable appellant to establish the admissibility of a polygraph test is erroneous as a matter of law. Commonwealth v. Brooks, 151 Pa. 75, 309 A. 2d 732 (1973). Reversed and remanded.