Case ID: ad2d_251/html/0499-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Ramzan Ali, Petitioner, v Queens County Supreme Court et al., Respondents.
    [673 NYS2d 334]
   —Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to enjoin the respondents from continuing unlawful and illegal proceedings against him, and application for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application is granted; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569; see, Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Copertino and Altman, JJ., concur.