Case ID: nj_48/html/0360-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MUNOZ REALTY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF VERONA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Argued November 21 and November 22, 1966—
    Decided December 21, 1966.
    
      Mr. Newton H. Porter, Jr. argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Porter & Hobart, of counsel).
    
      Mr. Emil E. Mascia argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Sarcone & Mascia, of counsel).
   The opinion of the court was delivered

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division of the Superior Court is affirmed for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division.

For affirmance ■ — ■ Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman— 6.

For reversal —None.