Case ID: sw2d_804/html/0756-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nathan PRESTON, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dolores PRESTON, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. 57152.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Oct. 30, 1990.
    Lisa Randie Rattner, Merle L. Silver-stein, Clayton, Harry Charles, St. Louis, for defendant/appellant.
    Nelson Lewis Mitten, Todd Hendrickson, Clayton, for plaintiff/respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for contempt in a dissolution case.

No jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).