Case ID: ohio-st-3d_85/html/0109-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State ex rel. O’Brien, Pros. Atty., et al., Appellants, v. Powerfone, Inc. et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as State ex rel. O’Brien v. Powerfone, Inc. (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 109.]
    (Nos. 98-148 and 98-630
    Submitted February 24, 1999
    Decided March 24, 1999.)
    
      Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Joseph R. Durham, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellants.
   The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Campanelli v. AT&T Wireless Serv., Inc. (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 103, 706 N.E.2d 1267, decided today.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Campanelli v. AT&T Wireless Serv., Inc. (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 103, 108-109, 706 N.E.2d 1267, 1270-1271.