Case ID: f-appx_465/html/0953-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PAID SEARCH ENGINE TOOLS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. YAHOO! INC., Defendant-Appellee, and Google Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and Microsoft Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 2011-1281.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    Feb. 13, 2012.
    Warren Jeffrey Sefton, Keating, Mue-thing & Klekamp, PLL, of Cincinnati, OH, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was J. Robert Chambers, Wood, Herron & Evans, LLP, of Cincinnati, OH.
    David A. Perlson, Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, of San Francisco, CA, argued for all defendants-appellees. With him on the brief for defendant-appel-lee Google Inc., were Charles K. Verhoe-ven, Emily C. O’Brien and Antonio R. Sistos. On the brief for defendant-appel-lee Yahoo! Inc., were Douglas E. Lumish, Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP, of San Francisco, CA; and Edward R. Reines, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, of Redwood Shores, CA. On the brief for defendant-appellee Microsoft Corp., were Constantine L. Trela, Jr. and Richard A. Cederoth, Sidley Austin LLP, of Chicago, IL; and Bryan K. Anderson, of Palo Alto, CA. of counsel was Tacy F. Flint.
    LOURIE, LINN, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.