Case ID: njl_127/html/0566-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WILLIAM NORTON, APPELLANT, v. CHARLES J. MONKS, CHIEF OF POLICE, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Argued October 22, 1941 —
    Decided January 9, 1942.
    Ror the appellant, Martin Klughaupt.
    
    Ror the respondents, Thomas E. Dufy.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bobine, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.