Case ID: so2d_586/html/0513-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SABAL CHASE HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Appellants, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, et al., Appellees.
    No. 91-439.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 8, 1991.
    Hyman & Kaplan and Edoardo Meloni, Miami, for appellants.
    Robert A. Ginsburg, County Atty. and Craig H. Coller, Asst. County Atty., Phyllis 0. Douglas, Miami, for appellees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The trial court correctly held that:

The use of Parcel 25A as an elementary school (Scheme “A” proposed site plan) as authorized by Dade County pursuant to Resolution No. R-1016-90 does not violate the restrictive covenants applicable to Parcel 25A and is a permissible use of the property by Dade County.

Affirmed.