Case ID: ny-st-rep_32/html/0675-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bischoff, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Israel D. Goodman, Resp’t, v. Jacob Cohen,App’lt.
    
    
      (New York Common Pleas, General Term
    
    
      Filed June 26, 1890.)
    
    Appeal — Reargtjment.
    A reargument will not be granted where an examination of the case and opinion fails to show a misconception concerning the questions presented.
    Appellant’s motion for reargument of appeal.
    
      Benno Loewy, for motion; Merman Joseph, opposed.
    
      
       See 29 N. Y. State Rep., 716.
    
   Bischoff, J.

A careful examination of the case on appeal and an inspection of the opinion delivered on the affirmation of the judgment herein failed to show any misconception concerning the questions presented. Therefore there does not appear to be any sufficient ground for a reargument

The legal questions presented, however, seem to be of sufficient importance within the meaning of rule 16 of the general term of this court, to entitle the appellant to go to the court of appeals. And a certificate to that effect should be granted him.

Larremore, Ch. J., concurs.