Case ID: fla_152/html/0439-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHARLES J. UHRIG v. ROY A. REDDING and wife, MARY E. REDDING.
    12 So. (2nd) 174
    January Term, 1943
    March 2, 1943
    Division A
    Rehearing' Denied March 17, 1943
    
      
      George Palmer Garret and Garland W. Spencer, for appellant.
    
      Lloyd F. Boyle, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM:

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the final decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said final decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said final decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.