Case ID: f-appx_201/html/0226-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Israel MAGANA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-40831
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Sept. 27, 2006.
    
      Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant>-Appellant.
    Before REAVLEY, GARZA and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Israel Magana appeals the sentence imposed by the district court following the revocation of his term of supervised release. Magana argues that his sentence exceeds the statutory maximum because it includes a one-year term of supervised release in addition to a two-year term of imprisonment.

A district court may revoke a term of supervised release and require a defendant to return to prison. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). Where the offense that resulted in the term of supervised release is a class C felony, as was Magana’s 1999 carjacking offense, the defendant may not be required to serve more than two years in prison. Id.; see 18 U.S.C. § 3559(a)(3).

Under the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h), as that section read at the time of Magana’s carjacking offense, the district court was also permitted to impose a term of supervised release to be served after imprisonment, but only when the term of imprisonment was less than the maximum term of imprisonment authorized under § 3583(e)(3). Section 3583(h) has since been amended; however, the amendment will not be applied retroactively absent a clear statement that Congress so intended. See Johnson v. United States, 529 U.S. 694, 702-03, 120 S.Ct. 1795, 146 L.Ed.2d 727 (2000). The Government, citing ex post facto concerns, properly concedes that § 3583(h) must be applied as it read when Magana committed the underlying carjacking offense.

Because Magana was sentenced to the maximum term of imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3), the district court was prohibited under the applicable version of § 3583(h) from imposing a subsequent term of supervised release. Accordingly, Magana’s sentence is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for resentencing.

VACATED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.