Case ID: so2d_385/html/0734-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James Alexander HARLOW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 79-2314.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 9, 1980.
    Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, Bar-tow, and Samuel Robert Mandelbaum, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Hearsay testimony was all that supported the violation of the monthly support condition. Also, there was no specific finding that appellant’s financial condition would allow him to pay the supervisory fee condition. Jones v. State, 360 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Therefore, we remand for the deletion of both those violated conditions on the order of revocation of probation. In all other respects, we affirm.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and OTT and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.