Case ID: nj_53/html/0497-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THOMAS STASILOWICZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued February 17, 1969
    Decided March 31, 1969.
    
      Mr. Eugene P. Kenny argued the cause for appellant.
    
      Mr. Abel Goldstein argued the cause for respondent {Mr. James A. Tumulty, Jr., Hudson County Prosecutor, attorney; Mr. William J. Curmane, on the brief).
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Leonard in the Appellate Division, reported, at 105 N. J. Super. 151.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Ebancis, Proctoe, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 7.

For reversal — None.