Case ID: njl_16/html/0271-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "By the Court,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

VANDERVEER v. CONOVER.
    
      Mr. Hamilton,
    
    in behalf of Mr. Havtshorne, moved for a rule to shew cause why a mandamus be not issued to Monmouth Common Pleas, to vacate their rule setting aside an execution. And cited Rev. L. 676.
    
      H. W. Green, contra,
    cited Penn. R. 431; 1 Green, 97, Jones v. Allen; 3 Halst. 205, State v. Halliday ; 5 Ib. 58; 7 Ib. 179 ; 1 Ib. 157; 2 Halst. 160.
   By the Court,

This is not a proner case for a mandamus.

Rule refused.