Case ID: so2d_218/html/0483-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James WATSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 68-263.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    Jan. 14, 1969.
    Rehearing Denied Feb. 25, 1969.
    James Watson, in pro. per.
    Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
    Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion for relief pursuant to Cr.R.P. 1.850, 33 F.S.A.

It is appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in denying him a full eviden-tiary hearing on this motion. We have carefully considered all points presented by appellant on appeal and have concluded that no reversible error has been shown. Belton v. State, Fla.1968, 217 So.2d 97 [opinion filed December 17, 1968] ; Spencer v. State, Fla.1961, 133 So.2d 729; Blount v. State, 30 Fla. 287, 11 So. 547.

Affirmed.