Case ID: ad2d_7/html/0903-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gertrude Meyers, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent.
   Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. Under the circumstances of this case, Special Term appropriately exercised its discretion in denying this motion for a preference under rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The plaintiff delayed making this application for a preference under rule 151 for approximately nine months after issue was joined. The papers do not include an affidavit by the plaintiff and no showing of a meritorious cause of action is made. As we have heretofore stated, the plaintiff has the burden of establishing the right to a preference under the rule, and the application may not be lightly granted (see Dodumoff v. Lyons, 4 A D 2d 626). Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, M. M. Frank, McNally and Stevens, JJ.