Case ID: nys_149/html/1096-11.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MELE, Appellant, v. WATERBURY CO., Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    October 2, 1914.)
    Action by Giuseppe Mele against the Waterbury Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs, to the extent of giving plaintiff, accompanied by not more than two persons, an inspection of the machine by which he claims to have been hurt, together with its equipment and appurtenances; that such persons be permitted to examine during bu.isiness hours such machine, both in operation and at rest, and to take a photograph of the same; that plaintiff give in writing notice to defendant's attorneys, two days before such inspection, of the day and hour when the same will be had; and that at the time named such inspection and photograph be made within a perIod not exceeding 15 minutes. See Pasuk v. American Manufacturing Co., 160 App. Div. 909, 144 N. Y. Supp. 1134.