Case ID: misc_27/html/0011-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Gaynor, J.:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Theodore Goodness, Plaintiff, v. The Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Defendant.
    (Supreme Court, Kings Special Term,
    March, 1899.)
    Practice — When, plaintiff will not be required, by motion, to state Ms residence by street and number.
    A motion by a defendant, a corporation, to require the plaintiff to furnish it his place of residence by street and number will be denied where it does not appear that the plaintiff’s attorney has, on request, refused to furnish these particulars.
    Motion to require the plaintiff to furnish his place of residence by street and number to the defendant.
    
      Henry A. Robinson for motion.
    Frederick G. Wetterau opposed.
   Gaynor, J.:

The court should not be bothered with a motion like this except upon proof that a request has been made to the, attorney for the Opposite side for the information and refused. In this case the order to show cause seems to have, been obtained only as a subterfuge to get an extension of time to answer.

The motion is denied, with' $10 costs and the extension of time to answer is vacated.