Case ID: ohio-st_175/html/0212-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Appeal of Sauter Development Co.: Sauter Development Co., Appellant, v. Hough, Appellee.
    (No. 38106 —
    Decided September 18, 1963.)
    
      Messrs. Bailey, Bailey, Bayer & Bayer, for appellant.
    
      Mr. Gerald R. Leipply, director of lav?, for appellee.
   Tbe appeal as of right herein is dismissed sua sponte for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.