Case ID: nys_142/html/1148-09.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

VALENTINO et al., Respondents, v. SCHANTZ et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.
    July 8, 1913.)
    Action by Pasquale Valentino and another against Philip Schantz and another.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment appealed from modified, by striking out the provision for extra allowance, and the words "or thing whatsoever" in the fifth provision of the judgment, and, as modified, affirmed, with costs. See, also, 153 App. Div. 934, 138 N. Y. Supp. 1147.

HOWARD, J., not sitting.