Case ID: nj_7/html/0345-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HARRY GLIDEAR, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. HAROLD A. CHARLES, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.
    Argued June 18, 1951
    Decided June 25, 1951.
    
      Mr. Raymond L. Gunneen argued the cause for the appellants.
    
      Mr. Benjamin PL. Priest argued the cause for the respondent.
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Rogers in the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

For affirmance—Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Case, Heiier, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling and Ackerson—7.

For reversal—None.