Case ID: misc_35/html/0820-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John J. Brierly, Respondent, v. Martin Connelly, Appellant.
    Appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, second district, borough of The Bronx.
    John P. Flanigan, for appellant.
    Thomas Garret Fennell, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

There were- questions of fact upon which the evidence was conflicting. The case was submitted to the jury under an unexceptionable charge. There are no exceptions in the case calling for comment.

Judgment should be affirmed, with costs, without opinion.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.