Case ID: cust-ct_62/html/1075-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Watson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Before the First Division,
    March 24, 1969
    No. P69/78.
    protests 67/6429 and 67/6430 (Philadelphia).
    No. P69/79.
    protests 67/43480, etc. (Los Angeles).
    No. P69/80.
    protests 67/90067, etc. (Honolulu).
    F. W. Woolworth Co. v. United States, F. W. Woolworth Co. et al. v. United States, F. W. Woolworth Co. et al. v. United States,
   Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by filie foregoing protests consists of artificial flowers in Chief value of plastic, assembled in the same manner as the plastic artificial flowers in Armbee Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 105, C.D. 3278) and Zunold Trading Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 3279), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.