Case ID: njl_72/html/0262-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HIRAM SNYDER AND WILLIAM H. HENDRICKSON, PARTNERS, &c., DEPENDANTS IN ERROR, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted March 27th, 1905
    Decided November 20th, 1905.
    This case is controlled by Gardner & Meeks Co. v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co., decided by this court at the present term.
    On error to the Hudson County Circuit Court.
    For the plaintiff in error, Edmund W. Wakelee and Vredenburgh, Wall & Van Winkle.
    
    For the defendants in error,- Cornelius E or emus.
    
   Per Curiam.

The questions raised in this ease are the same as those raised in Gardner & Meeks Company v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, decided by this court at the present term (ante ¶. 257). The judgment under review herein will be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Pitney in that case.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Port, Garretson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Yroom, Green, Gray. 13.

For reversal — -None.