Case ID: nys_33/html/1133-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PILS, Respondent, v. MANHATTAN RY. CO. et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.
    April 11, 1895.)
    Action by John Peter Pils against the Manhattan Railway Company and others.
    Henry J. Hemmens, for appellants.
    Leo C. Dessar, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We think the judgment is in all respects right except upon the question of the award made, which, upon the evidence, we think was too high, and that it should be accordingly reduced, and the rental damages fixed at $900, and the fee damages at $1,200; and, as so reduced, the judgment should be affirmed, without costs.