Case ID: liquor-tax-rep_3/html/0056-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Keener, J.:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Supreme Court, New York Special Term.
    Reported. N. Y. L. J.,..
    December 26, 1902.
    Patrick W. Cullinan v. Otto Kuch, et al.
    
      William E. Schenclc, for plaintiff.
    
      K acial tC- Carr ere, for defendant.
    
      Page & Eekley, for defendant Kucli.
   Keener, J.:

The contention that the bond is void because of a non-compliance with the Liquor Tax Law is not well taken. (Lyman v. Brucker, 26 Misc. 594; 42 App. Div. 624.) The plaintiff is entitled to judgment on the verdict.