Case ID: ga-app_16/html/0619-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Wade, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

5994.
    Loving & Co. v. Parker, guardian.
    Decided July 30, 1915.
    Action for damages; from city court of Amerieus — Judge Little-john presiding. August 11, 1914.
    
      Shipp & Sheppard, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      L. J. Blalock, J. A. Hiceon, contra.
   Wade, J.

1. There is no substantial merit in any of the exceptions to the charge of the court, when the excerpts complained of are viewed in connection with the entire charge.

2. The evidence sufficiently supported the allegations made in the petition, proof of which this court has heretofore held would warrant a recovery (Parker v. Loving, 13 Ga. App. 284, 79 S. E. 77), and the verdict was authorized.

3. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.