Case ID: ny_151/html/0629-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas A. Mills, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn City Railroad Company, Appellant.
    
      Mills v. Brooklyn Oily R. R. Go., 10 Miso. Rep. 1, affirmed.
    (Argued October 27, 1896;
    decided December 1, 1896.)
    Appeal from a judgment of tlie General Term of the City-Court of Brooklyn, entered October 24, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.
    
      P. S. Dudley and Thomas S. Moore for appellant.
    
      J. Stewart Ross for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur, O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin and Vann, JJ.; not voting, Andrews, Ch. J., and Haight, J.; not sitting, Gray, J.