Case ID: so3d_167/html/0506-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "LOGUE, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MAYSVILLE, INC., Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. The WHITING-TURNER CONTRACTING COMPANY, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
    No. 3D14-1681.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 24, 2015.
    Rehearing Denied July 9, 2015.
    Pardo Gainsburg, P.L., and Jeffrey J. Pardo, for appellant/cross-appellee.
    Broad and Cassel, and Michael K. Wilson and George W. (“Trey”) Tate III (Orlando), and Beverly A. Pohl (Fort Lauder-dale), for appellee/cross-appellant.
    Before WELLS, EMAS, and LOGUE, JJ.
   LOGUE, J.

In this condominium project dispute between Maysville, Inc. (“Developer”) and The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company (“General Contractor”), the Developer filed a two-count complaint against the General Contractor and the General Contractor filed several counterclaims. The trial court entered judgment against the Developer on both of its claims. We a£firm those rulings without discussion.

We reverse, however, the involuntary dismissal of the counterclaims. Without a motion being made by the Developer, the trial court involuntary dismissed the counterclaims . before the General Contractor had an opportunity to complete the presentation of its evidence. As the Developer commendably concedes, the trial court erred. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.420(b) (2014) (providing for an involuntary dismissal for lack of evidence only “[a]fter a party seeking affirmative relief in an action tried by the court without a jury has completed the presentation of evidence”); Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co. v. Santiago, 117 So.3d 1146, 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (“Simply put, it is error to direct a verdict before a plaintiff has completed presentation of his evidence .... [T]he same concept applies to an involuntary dismissal.”) (internal citation and quotations omitted).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.