Case ID: ariz_146/html/0511-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HOLOHAN, Chief Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

707 P.2d 309
    Clayton K. MILLER, III, an unmarried man for himself and as Guardian for Michelle Katherine Miller, Plaintiff/Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Susan UHRICK, an unmarried woman and Title Insurance Company of Minnesota, doing business in Arizona as a Corporation, Defendants/Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
    No. 18189-PR.
    Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.
    Sept. 25, 1985.
    Kathleen McCarthy, Tucson, for plaintiff/appellant.
    Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell & Hanshaw, P.C. by Steven Cox, Tucson, for defendants/ appellees.
   HOLOHAN, Chief Justice.

We granted review in this case to resolve an issue which evaded our review in Sanson v. Gonzales, 141 Ariz. 633, 688 P.2d 641 (1984). The issue is presented again in this case: What is the effect of a clause which provides for nonwaiver of time is of the essence provision in a deed of trust when the holder accepts late payments?

The resolution of the above issue by Division II of the Court of Appeals in this case is consistent with the views of this court, and we, therefore, approve the decision, Clayton K. Miller III v. Susan Uhrick, 146 Ariz. 413, 706 P.2d 739 (App.1985).

GORDON, Vice Chief Justice, and HAYS, CAMERON and FELDMAN, JJ., concur.