Case ID: nys_155/html/1098-08.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

C. LUDWIG BAUMANN & CO., BROOKLYN, Respondent, v. BAUMANN et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    October 15, 1915.)
    Action by C. Ludwig Baumann & Co., Brooklyn, against Amelia Baumann and others.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. We think that on the evidence of the defendant Amelia Baumann, and in the light of the proofs adduced by the plaintiff, the trial court was justified in finding that the use of the name "Baumann," without any other designation, by the defendants, was not in gocd faith. See, also, 155 N. Y. Supp. 1098.