Case ID: sc_205/html/0276-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

15681
    BOYKIN v. CAPEHART ET AL.
    
    (31 S. E. (2d), 506)
    
      
      Mr. Henry Savage, Jrof Camden, S. C., and Mr. C. T. Graydon, of Columbia, S. C., Counsel for Appellant,
    
      
      Messrs. Robinson & Robinson, and Messrs. Thomas> Cain & Black, all of Columbia, S. C., Counsel for Respondents
    October 3, 1944.
   PER CURIAM.

The Court is satisfied, from a careful study of the questions presented by this appeal, that Judge Bellinger correctly disposed of all issues involved in the case. The decree of the Circuit Court, the order refusing a new trial, and the order confirming the survey and plat of the boundary line, set forth fully the history of the litigation. We are in accord with the reasoning and conclusions of Judge Bellinger in his decree and orders, and affirm the judgment of the lower Court.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Chiee Justice Baker and Messrs. Associate Justices Fishburne,-StukEs^ Tayeor, and Oxner concur.