Case ID: ga-app_29/html/0383-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

14021.
    Commercial Credit Company Inc. v. Dean.
    Decided January 11, 1923.
    Complaint; from IJpson superior court — Judge Searcy. September 16, 1922.
    
      Claude Worrill, for plaintiff. James R. Davis, for defendant.
   Broyles, C, J.

There being an acute conflict in the evidence as to whether the note sued upon had been paid, as set up in the defendant’s plea, the court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant.' The evidence did not show an accord and satisfaction.

Judgment reversed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.