Case ID: f-appx_682/html/0814-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ian M. BOWENS, a.k.a. New Man, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-10228 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    (March 17, 2017)
    Lindsay Feinberg, Michael J. Moore, U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Macon, GA, Leah E. McEwen, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Albany, GA, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee
    Barry Debrow, Jr., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Columbus, GA, Christina Lee Hunt, Martin J. Vogelbaum, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Macon, GA, for Defendant-Appellant
    Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Dodson, appointed counsel for Ian Bowens in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel ⅛ motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bowens’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.