Case ID: ala-app_22/html/0119-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "RICE, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(113 So. 318)
    REDDING v. PHENIX CITY.
    (4 Div. 280.)
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    June 7, 1927.
    Frank M. de Graffenried, of Seale, for appellant.
    Roy L. Smith, of Phenix City, for appellee.
    Brief did not reach the Reporter.
   RICE, J.

In a prosecution for the violation of the terms of a city ordinance, except in certain specified cases, of which this is not one (Acts 1915, p. 294), it is essential that the ordinance in question, properly authenticated, be introduced in evidence. Smith v. Town of Eclectic, 18 Ala. App. 329, 92 So. 212. This was not done in this case, and for that reason the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.