Case ID: sw3d_323/html/0081-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Percy D. WINSTON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 94224.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Oct. 12, 2010.
    Maleaner Harvey, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Percy D. Winston (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his amended Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant argues that the motion court erred because his plea counsel provided him ineffective assistance that impinged on the voluntariness and understanding of his guilty pleas. We affirm the motion court’s judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find Movant is entitled to no relief on appeal. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the motion court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).