Case ID: sw3d_151/html/0078-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Garfield WHITE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 83796.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Nov. 30, 2004.
    
      Jessica Hathaway, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Deborah Daniels, Lisa M. Kennedy, co-counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J„ and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Garfield White (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying without an evidentiary hearing his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not clearly err in denying Appellant’s motion without an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b). 
      
      . All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2004, unless otherwise indicated.