Case ID: nys_88/html/1115-14.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SALTZMAN, Respondent, v. FRIEDMAN et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    May 5, 1904.)
    Action by Harry Saltzma-n against Harris Friedman and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendants, appeal. Affirmed. Shapiro & Shapiro, for appellants. Henry Kuntz and Sigmund Horkimer,. for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

No point is made by appellants on plaintiff’s branch of the ease, and their-contention relates solely to questions connected with the counterclaim interposed by them. They-appear to be mostly questions of fact, which were properly submitted to the jury. The record discloses no errors in the admission of evidence or the charge of the court, and the verdict is sufficiently supported by the evidence. The judgment and order must be affirmed, with-costs.