Case ID: so2d_585/html/1203-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. Rodney HORN, Appellant, v. HAVERFIELD CORPORATION, Appellee.
    No. 91-1280.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 1, 1991.
    Colson Hicks Eidson Colson & Matthews and Joe Matthews, Miami, for appellant.
    Anderson Moss Parks Meyers & Sher-ouse and Gary S. Koenigsberg, for appel-lee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an injunctive order enforcing a restrictive covenant. We need not determine whether the amendment to § 542.33(2)(a) should be applied in the enforcement of a contract entered into before its effective date or whether we should follow the majority or the dissenting opinion in Hapney v. Central Garage, Inc., 579 So.2d 127 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), because, on any standard, there is no error or abuse of discretion.

Affirmed.