Case ID: nj-misc_3/html/0693-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Míntukn, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SALVATORE TUCCILLO, PLAINTIFF, v. JOHN T. CLARK & SON, INCORPORATED, AND ELERMAN’S WILSON LINE, LIMITED, DEFENDANTS.
    Decided July 6, 1925.
    Pleadings — Motion to Strike Out — Pleading Created Enough Doubt to Warrant Refusal.
    For the plaintiff, Kent <£• Kent.
    
    For the defendant Clark & Son, Collins & Corbin.
    
   The opinion of the court was delivered by •

Míntukn, J.

After an examination of the briefs in the above-entitled action, I have concluded that, in view of the termination of the Chief Justice in Young v. Sterling Leather Works, 96 Atl. Rep. 1016, there is enough doubt in the situation created by the pleading to warrant a refusal of the motion to strike out the complaint as against the defendant John T. Clark & Son, Inc.

Such will be the order.