Case ID: so2d_89/html/0487-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LUBY CHEVROLET COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Robert Elmer KING, Appellee.
    Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.
    Sept. 14, 1956.
    Schwarz & Zinn, Miami, for .appellant.
    Charles J. Bodner, Miami, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of the appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A., Rule 38 of the rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeál are without substantial merit and need no further argument,

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from he, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON and THOMAS, JJ., concur.