Case ID: f-appx_465/html/0226-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rose ISBELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephen FRIEDMAN; Joseph, Greenwald and Laake, PA, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 11-2113.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 9, 2012.
    Decided: Feb. 13, 2012.
    Rose Isbell, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Michael Creed, Veronica B. Nannis, Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, PA, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rose Isbell appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Isbell v. Friedman, No. 8:11-cv-01152-AW, 2011 WL 4381422 (D. Md. filed Sept. 16, 2011, entered Sept. 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.