Case ID: f-appx_405/html/0868-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jeremy Rayshard STANDIFER, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-50820
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Dec. 21, 2010.
    Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    
      Brian Linn Gibson, Groesbeck, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Jeremy Rayshard Standifer, Seagoville, TX, pro se.
    Before DAVIS, SMITH and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Jeremy Rayshard Standifer has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Standifer has filed a response.

The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Standifer’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th Cir.1987).

Our independent review of the record, counsel’s briefs, and Standifer’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Standifer’s motion to dismiss counsel is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir.1998). 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.