Case ID: njl_97/html/0571-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MINNIE KNAUBER. INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. MANUFACTURERS’ LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY AND TIETJEN & LANG DRY DOCK COMPANY, APPELLANTS.
    Submitted March 27, 1922
    Decided April 28, 1922.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which the following per curiam was filed :
    “This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in the Hudson County Court of Common Pleas against the appellants, the Manufacturers’ Liability Insurance Company and the Tietjen & Lang Dry Dock Company for $350 and costs. The identical questions are presented in this case by the appellants as are presented in the ease of Duties v. Manufacturers’ Liability Insurance Co. and Tietjen & Lang Dry Dock Co., and which has just been decided. 96 N. J. L. 107.
    “For the reasons given in that opinion, the judgment in this ease will be affirmed, with costs.”
    
      For the appellants, Randolph Perkins.
    
    For the respondent, Charles M. Egan. '
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackersox, Van Bus-kirk, JJ. 13.

For reversal — -None.