Case ID: ad2d_225/html/0627-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of James Morrell, Petitioner, v New York State Racing and Wagering Board, Respondent.
    [639 NYS2d 730]
   Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the respondent’s determination is supported by substantial evidence in the record (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit (cf., Matter of LaChance v Corbisiero, 160 AD2d 293). Thompson, J. P., Joy, Hart and Plorio, JJ., concur.