Case ID: f-appx_404/html/0146-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Fortino CHOLULA-RIOS, a.k.a. Fortinio Rios Cholula, a.k.a. Leonardo Cholula, a.k.a. Leopold Fortino Cholula, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 09-73718.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.
    
    Filed Nov. 19, 2010.
    Fortino Cholula-Rios, Eloy, AZ, pro se.
    OIL, David H. Wetmore, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
    Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Fortino Cholula-Rios, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary denial of Cholula-Rios’s cancellation of removal application. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Bermudez v. Holder, 586 F.3d 1167, 1169 (9th Cir.2009) (per curiam). Cholula-Rios’s challenge to the IJ’s weighing of the evidence is not a legal argument that confers jurisdiction.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.