Case ID: f-appx_430/html/0581-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rogelio Medina DIAZ-BARRIGA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-30343.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 20, 2011.
    
    Filed April 28, 2011.
    Anthony G. Hall, Esquire, Aaron Nicholas Lucoff, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Boise, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Dennis Michael Charney, Charney & Associates, Eagle, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: RYMER, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes tiiis case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Rogelio Medina Diaz-Barriga appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We dismiss.

We dismiss the appeal based on the valid and enforceable appeal waiver, which encompasses Diaz-Barriga’s right to appeal on the grounds raised, and which was knowingly and voluntarily made. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 985-88 (9th Cir.2009); United States v. VanDoren, 182 F.3d 1077, 1081 (9th Cir.1999) (district court satisfied requirements under Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 regarding mandatory minimum penalty). Contrary to Diaz-Barriga’s assertion, the government did not waive the appeal waiver.

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.