Case ID: pa_358/html/0069-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "■Pee Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LaPosta v. Himmer et al., Appellants, et al.
    
      Argued October 2,1947.
    Before Maxey, C. J., Drew, Linn, Stern, Patterson, Stearne and Jones, JJ.
    
      
      Sanford M. Chile ote, with him Dickie, Robinson & McCamey, for defendant, appellants.
    
      E. V. Buckley, with him Mercer & Buckley, for plaintiff, appellee.
    
      Samuel W. Pringle, with him Dalzell, McFall, Pringle & Bredin, for additional defendant, áppellée.
    November 24, 1947:
   ■Pee Curiam,

All of the alleged errors covered by the appellants’ assignments on this appeal were painstakingly considered and correctly disposed of by the learned court en banc. As nothing is to be gained by Our reiterating either the facts or the law, the judgment will be affirmed on the opinion of Judge Kennedy for the court below.

Judgment affirmed.