Case ID: ad2d_228/html/0632-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

C. Pavlou, Inc., Plaintiff, v Gaetano Gargano et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Cardon Brick Corp., Appellant, v Frank Cusimano et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 2.) Gaetano Gargano et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v Carmine Sirico et al., Third-Party DefendantsAppellants. (Action No. 3.)
    [644 NYS2d 994]
   The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in relieving the default of the third-party plaintiffs in responding to the third-party defendants’ notice to admit (see, CPLR 3123, 2005; Gutenplan v Dauman, 154 AD2d 337). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.