Case ID: ga_111/html/0813-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Fish, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Penland v. Bleckley.
    Submitted March 14, —
    Dated April 6, 1900.
    Certiorari. Before Judge Estes. Rabun superior court. February term, 1899.
    
      W. S. Paris, for plaintiff. W F. Findley, contra.
   Fish, J.

As the evidence submitted to the jury trying the case in the justice’s court was sufficient to authorize the verdict rendered, there was no abuse of discretion by the judge of the superior court in overruling a certiorari, when no error of law was complained of, and the only question was whether the verdict was contrary to evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

AU the Justices concurring.