Case ID: sw3d_518/html/0858-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Karen LITTLE, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Respondent, v. Anthony BROWN, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Appellant.
    NO. ED 103368
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    Filed: April 25, 2017
    Anthony T. Brown, Bellevue, Nebraska, Pro se.
    Jayson B. Lenox, St. Charles, Missouri, for Respondent.
    Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Anthony Brown appeals the trial court’s judgment upon jury verdicts in favor of his divorce lawyer, Karen Little, after Little filed a suit on account to recover her fees and Brown countersued for malpractice. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).