Case ID: f-appx_423/html/0648-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rex I. HATFIELD and Everly Hatfield, Defendants-Appellants.
    Nos. 10-3890, 10-3905.
    United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
    Submitted June 7, 2011.
    Decided June 14, 2011.
    
      Robert L. Garrison, Office of the United States Attorney, Fairview Heights, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Phillip J. Kavanaugh, III, Office of the Federal Public Defender, East St. Louis, IL, for Defendants-Appellants.
    Before RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge, JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge and SAMUEL DER-YEGHIAYAN, District Judge.
    
    
      
       Hon. Samuel Der-Yeghiayan of the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.
    
   ORDER

The defendants were convicted by a jury of distributing illegal drugs with result of causing death to consumers of the drugs, and related offenses, and appealed. We reversed just the convictions relating to some of the deaths, for error in the jury instructions, but affirmed the other convictions, 591 F.3d 945 (7th Cir.2010). On remand to the district court, the government dismissed the charges on which we had reversed, and as a result there was no occasion for a new trial; instead the judge simply resentenced the defendants.

They moved for a new trial of the entire case primarily on the ground that the government had improperly withheld from the defense material the defense could have used to impeach some of the government’s witnesses. The district judge denied the motion for a new trial in a 26-page opinion in which he ruled that the government should have turned over the material but that it would not have altered the result. We have nothing to add to the judge’s analysis. He did not abuse his discretion in denying a new trial.

The judgments are therefore affirmed.