Case ID: f2d_863/html/0008-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ali BOURESLAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARAMCO, Arabian American Oil Co. and Aramco Service Company, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 87-2206.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Dec. 23, 1988.
    James Field Tyson, Neal H. Paster, Perry Archer, Houston, Tex., for Boureslan.
    Charles A. Shanor, Vincent J. Black-wood, Karen MacRae, Attys., EEOC, Washington, D.C., for intervenor EEOC.
    Edward E. Potter, McGuiness & Williams, Washington, D.C., for amicus EEAC.
    John D. Roady, Linda Ottinger Headley, Hutcheson & Grundy, Houston, Tex., for Aramco.
    Lawrence Z. Lorber, John E. Parauda, Breed, Abbott & Morgan, Washington, D.C., for amicus ASPA.
    Cecil J. Olmstead, Steptoe & Johnson, Washington, D.C., for amicus Rule of Law Committee.
   ON SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH and DUHE, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestions for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.