Case ID: f-appx_579/html/0998-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A., and Uniloc USA, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ECLINICAL WORKS, LLC, and Pulse Systems, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 2014-1005.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    Oct. 14, 2014.
    Lawrence M. Hadley, McKool Smith Hennigan, P.C., of Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was Alan P. Block; and Daniel L. Geyser, of Dallas, TX. Of counsel on the brief was James L. Etheridge, Ether-idge Law Group, of Southlake, TX.
    Keith M. Aurzada, Bryan Cave LLP, of Dallas, TX, argued for defendant-appellee, eClinical Works, LLC. With him on the brief was John C. Bush, of Atlanta, GA. Of counsel on the brief was Ryan T. Pum-pian, Bloom Sugarman Everett, LLP, of Atlanta, GA.
    Don V. Kelly, Evans & Dixon, LLC, of Saint Louis, MO, argued for defendant-appellee, Pulse Systems, Inc.
    MOORE, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged.-

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.