Case ID: sw3d_509/html/0115-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the INTEREST OF D.W., Appellant, v. JUVENILE OFFICER, TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, Respondent.
    No. ED 103084
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    FILED: April 26, 2016
    For Appellant: Craig A. Johnston, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203.
    
      For Respondent: Susan C. Guerra, 920 N. Vandeventer Blvd., St. Louis, Missouri 68108.
    Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Roy L. Richter, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

D.W. (“Juvenile”) appeals from the court’s judgment, adopting the juvenile court commissioner’s finding and recommendations that Juvenile committed what would have been, if he were an adult, tampering in the first degree, in violation of Section 569.080, RSMo (Cum. Supp. 2005). Juvenile was ordered to be committed to the care, custody, and control of the Division of Youth Services for appropriate placement. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).