Case ID: ga_173/html/0162-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam. Hines, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Smith v. Cochran.
    No. 7944.
    July 25, 1931.
   Per Curiam.

Under the pleadings and the evidence, the judge, to whom the ease was submitted for decision without the intervention of a jury, did not err in finding for the defendant and rendering the judgment to which exception is taken.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Sines, J., who dissents, and Gilbert, J., absent.

Hines, J.

dissenting. See Anderson v. Goodwin, 125 Ga. 663, 670 (54 S. E. 679), and cases cited in Smith v. Bennett, ante, 159.

C. W. Foy, for plaintiff. Homer Beeland, for defendant.