Case ID: f-appx_331/html/0711-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antoine Wilbert JEAN-LOUIS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-16177
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Aug. 13, 2009.
    Antoine Wilbert Jean-Louis, Jesup, GA, pro se.
    
      Susan Hollis Rothstein-Youakim, U.S. Attorney’s Office/Mfl, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Before BLACK, BARKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Joseph C. Bodiford, appointed counsel for Antoine Wilbert Jean-Louis in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jean-Louis’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Nevertheless, we VACATE the judgment and commitment order due to a clerical error and REMAND the case to the district court with instructions for it to correct this order to reflect the correct period of supervised release announced at sentencing — namely, eight years on Count 1 and three years on Count 2, to run concurrently.