Case ID: f-appx_441/html/0254-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. David Glen METCALF, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 11-50050
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Sept. 16, 2011.
    Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Judy Fulmer Madewell, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Henry Joseph Bem-porad, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED. Appellant concedes his arguments are foreclosed by circuit precedent; to wit: United States v. Johnson, 632 F.3d 912 (5th Cir.2011); United States v. Heth, 596 F.3d 255 (5th Cir.2010); and United States v. Whaley, 577 F.3d 254 (5th Cir.2009). Appellant also indicates that he raises the arguments for possible Supreme Court review. The judgment of the district court is SUMMARILY AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.