Case ID: sw3d_382/html/0192-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Fredrick NELSON, Appellant, v. NORDSTROM, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
    No. ED 98019.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Sept. 4, 2012.
    John J. Ammann, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Kenneth Paul Carp, Clayton, MO, for respondent Nordstrom, Inc.
    Ninion S. Riley, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent Division of Employment Security.
    Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Fredrick Nelson (“Claimant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the dismissal of his claim for unemployment benefits because Claimant failed to participate in the scheduled hearing before the appeals tribunal. We find the Commission did not err in affirming the dismissal of Claimant’s appeal. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).