Case ID: okla_164/html/0037-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ARMSTRONG et al. v. TAYLOR.
    No. 22715.
    Opinion Filed May 23, 1933.
    Holloway & Holden, for plaintiffs in error.
    Hal Welch, for defendant in error.
   PER CURIAM.

This cause was filed herein August 13, 1931, and thereafter the brief was filed on October 12, 1931. Defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss, which was thereupon denied.

Since Unit date, on April 22, 1933, the defendant in error has filed a confession of error, and asks that the cause be reversed and remanded to the lower court for further proceedings, since the cause has never beeja fully tried in the court below, and it appears upon examination of the petition in error and the prayer thereof that the plaintiff in error seeks to have tEe cause reversed and remanded, with instructions to reinstate plaintiff in error’s answer, and that the cause proceed to trial in accordance with the statutes in such ease made and provided. The cause is, therefore, upon said application and confession of error, reversed and remanded, with directions to proceed in accordance with the prayer of the petition in error.