Case ID: nys_67/html/0083-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BRINKLEY v. NAUGHTON et al.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    November 27, 1900.)
    
    Appeal—Judgment—Conoltjsiveness.
    A judgment on conflicting evidence will not be disturbed on appeal.
    Appeal from municipal court, borough of Manhattan, Tenth district.
    Action by Robert G. Brinkley against Bernard Naughton and others. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal.
    Affirmed.
    Argued before BEEKMAN, P. J., and GIEGERICH and O’GORMAN, JJ.
    Thomas C. O’Sullivan, for appellants.
    Elmer E. Cooley, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

No question of law being presented by the record, and the judgment having been rendered on conflicting evidence, there must be an affirmance.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.