Case ID: njl_84/html/0769-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

EMMA MANN WRAY, APPELLANT, v. ELIAS BERTRAM MOTT AND NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY, RESPONDENTS.
    Argued March 6, 1913
    Decided May 9, 1913.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 54 Vroom 110.
    For the appellant, Charlton A. Reed.
    
    For the respondent, Edward A. & William T. Day.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Parker.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Bergen, Kaltsou, Bogert, Vrebknburgu, Congdon, White, IIeppeniieimer, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.