Case ID: misc_31/html/0762-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Ouriam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hudson P. Rose, Respondent, v. Walter E. Andrews, Appellant.
    Appeal from a determination of the General Term of the City Court of the city of New York, affirming a judgment of the Trial Term rendered on the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiff.
    Charles P. Hallock, for appellant.
    Oliver W. Beals, for respondent.
   Per Ouriam.

We have carefully examined the record and find no reversible error. The questions involved were purely matters of fact, as to which the jury found in plaintiff’s favor. The exceptions are without merit, and as to most of the objections sought to be raised on appeal,- the defendant took neither objection nor exception.

Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Present: Tbuax, P. J., Scott and Dugbo, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.