Case ID: so2d_351/html/0738-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SMITH, Acting Chief Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. W. WHITTENTON, Sr., et ux., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW SMYRNA BEACH, Appellee.
    No. EE-59.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Nov. 4, 1977.
    Rehearing Denied Dec. 1, 1977.
    Richard S. Graham of Landis, Graham, French, Husfeld, Sherman & Ford, P. A., Daytona Beach, for appellants.
    Charles A. Hall, New Smyrna Beach, for appellee.
   SMITH, Acting Chief Judge.

Viewed in a light favorable to the City, the evidence supports the trial court’s decision that the City is not estopped to enforce its zoning ordinance proscribing the use of appellants’ house by paying boarders. The evidence on the elements of estoppel was conflicting and did not establish appellants’ right to continued use as a matter of law. City of North Miami v. Margulies, 289 So.2d 424 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN and MELVIN, JJ., concur.