Case ID: so2d_529/html/0888-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Steven V. VENABLE, et ux. v. Gregory C. SMITH, et al.
    No. W88-899.
    Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
    Aug. 26, 1988.
    Bernard S. Smith, Lafayette, for defendant-applicant.
    Jack P. Showers, Lafayette, for plaintiff-respondent.
    Michael S. O'Brien, David S. Cook, Lafayette, for defendant-respondent.
    Before FORET, LaBORDE and KNOLL, JJ.
   WRIT DENIED: There is no error in the ruling complained of. An in camera inspection by the trial court to determine whether or not an attorney’s file contains discoverable material is not a violation of C.C.P. art. 1422 et seq. Also, see McHugh v. Chastant, 503 So.2d 791 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1987).