Case ID: f-appx_53/html/0238-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roosevelt BROADUS, a/k/a Supreme, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-7082.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 18, 2002.
    Decided Dec. 16, 2002.
    Roosevelt Broadus, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Roosevelt Broadus seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Broadus has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Broadus, No. CR-91-209-G (M.D.N.C. June 5, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauper-is, and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2000); see Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.