Case ID: sw2d_953/html/0178-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Interest of J.G., P.G., C.G. and B.G., Plaintiffs. JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent, v. R.G. (Natural Father), C.G. (Natural Mother), Appellants.
    Nos. WD 53343, WD 53409, WD 53607.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Oct. 14, 1997.
    Steven G. Sakoulas, Steven R. Sehanker, Bortnick, Komoroski, McKeon & Sakoulas, Kansas City, for Natural Father.
    Brian C. Fries, Kenner & James, Kansas City, for Natural Mother.
    Kyla Grove, Kansas City, for Guardian Ad Litem.
    Robert M. Schieber, Kansas City, for respondent.
    Before HOWARD, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and HANNA, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants C.G. and R.G. appeal the trial court’s order terminating their parental rights to their four children. They claim that the trial court did not have clear, cogent, and convincing evidence to support its judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no reversible error. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order and have supplied the parties with a memorandum setting forth our reasoning.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).