Case ID: cust-ct_55/html/0630-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Rao, Chief Judge:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(Reap. Dec. 11088)
    The Hoenig Plywood Corporation v. United States
    Entry No. 721393.
    (Decided October 19, 1965)
    
      Sharp, Solter & Hutchison for tbe plaintiff.
    
      John W. Douglas, Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.
   Rao, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by tbe undersigned, subject to tbe approval of tbe Court:
1. That tbe subject merchandise consists of bardboard exported from Sweden as to wbicb tbe Secretary of tbe Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to tbe Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).
2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and tbe foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to tbe merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of tbe Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, tbe appraiser appraised all of tbe merchandise in tbe appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.
4. That tbe plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to tbe values referred to in tbe above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.
5. That at tbe times relevant herein tbe purchase price and the foreign market value under tbe said Antidumping Act are as specified in tbe aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.
6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.
7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.
8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.