Case ID: sw2d_956/html/0954-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edward R. BRYANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 54374.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Dec. 23, 1997.
    Emmett D. Queener, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before SPINDEN, P.J., and LAURA DENYIR STITH and EDWIN H. SMITH, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Edward R. Bryant appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Bryant claims that the court erred in denying his motion because his trial counsel misled him by incorrectly stating that he could be sentenced to 10 years as a persistent offender if he went to trial. Mr. Bryant has failed to meet his burden to show prejudice because he did not claim that absent the incorrect information he would not have pleaded guilty and insisted on going to trial. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order and have supplied the parties with a memorandum setting forth our rea-, soning. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).