Case ID: br_572/html/0365-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN RE: YAN SUI, Debtor. Yan Sui, Appellant, v. Richard Alan Marshack, Appellee.
    No. 15-60065
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted May 8, 2017 
    
    Filed May 18, 2017
    
      Yan Sui, Pro Se
    Chad V. Haes, Attorney, Marshack Hays LLP, Irvine, CA, for Appellee
    Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument.
      
        See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Chapter 7 debtor Yan Sui appeals pro se from an order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) dismissing as moot Sui’s appeal of the bankruptcy court’s order approving the sale of real property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the BAP’s determination that a bankruptcy appeal is moot. Nat’l Mass Media Telecomm. Sys., Inc. v. Stanley (In re Nat’l Mass Media Telecomm. Sys., Inc.), 152 F.3d 1178, 1180 (9th Cir. 1998). We affirm.

The BAP properly dismissed Sui’s appeal as moot because the property at issue was conveyed to a third party which prevented the BAP from granting effective relief. See id. at 1180-81 (affirming dismissal on the basis of mootness where the sale of the property to a non-party prevented the court from granting effective relief).

Because Sui’s appeal is moot, we do not consider his arguments addressing the underlying merits of the appeal.

All pending requests and motions are denied.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.