Case ID: okla_58/html/0759-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "KANE, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HERTZEL v. CHAMBERS et al.
    
    No. 8370.
    Opinion Filed November 28, 1916.
    (161 Pac. 1198.)
    
      Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Geo. C. Crump, Assigned Judge.
    
    Action between Andrew Hertzel and, Luyanda Chambers and others. From the judgment, Hertzel brings error.
    Dismissed.
    
      Sherman, Veasey & Davidson and J. P. O’Meara, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Fred S. Zick and William Neff, for defendants in error.
   KANE, C. J.

This cause comes on to be heard upon a motion to dismiss the proceeding in error, upon the following grounds :

“(1) No summons in error has been served upon this defendant in error and the final order from which the appeal is taken was made on December 4, 1915, more than eight months ago. (2) The case-made was signed and settled without notice to this defendant in error, who did not appear at the settlement, and did not waive notice of the signing and settling of the case-made.”

The motion to dismiss is.’ not resisted, and, as both grounds for dismissal seem to be well taken, the motion to dismiss will be sustained. It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.