Case ID: nys_35/html/1101-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

KETTLE v. TURL et al.
    (Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.
    December 2, 1895.)
    Appeal—Resettlement op Case.
    After argument and decision of an appeal, it is too late for the defeated party to move for a resettlement of the case.
    Action by James Kettle against John Turl and others. A motion by plaintiff for a new trial on exceptions ordered to be heard at general term in the first instance was denied (34 H. Y. Supp. 75), and plaintiff now moves for a resettlement of the case. Denied.
    Argued before DALY, O. J., and BISCHOFF and PRYOR, JJ.
    George H. Hart (John H. Whiting, of counsel), for plaintiff.
    Hiles & Johnson (William W. Hiles, of counsel), for defendants.
   PER CURIAM.

Motion for resettlement of case. After argument and decision of an appeal it is too late for the defeated party to apply for a resettlement of the case in order to obtain a different statement of facts upon the record by the insertion of questions and answers which he deemed immaterial in making up his case, and which for the first time appear material to him after an adverse decision. It might be different if the proposed amendment were in support of a judgment, and where matter was improperly inserted or omitted by the other party to the controversy.

Motion denied, with $10 costs.