Case ID: f2d_822/html/0510-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Philip LANDRY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Judge J. Robert HOEPFNER and William Guste, Jr., Attorney General, State of Louisiana, Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 85-3784.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    July 9, 1987.
    Mark McTernan, McTernan, Parr & Rumage, New Orleans, La., for petitioner-appellant.
    Dorothy A. Pendergast, Asst. Dist. Atty., Research & Appeals, Gretna, La., for respondents-appellees.
    Rene I. Salomon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baton Rouge, La., for amicus-Da’s.
    E. Pete Adams, Executive Director, La. Dist. Attys. Assoc., Inc., Baton Rouge, La., for amicus-Exec. Dir. La. Da’s Assoc.
   ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion June 3, 1987, 5 Cir., 1987, 818 F.2d 1169)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, HILL, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.