Case ID: f-appx_479/html/0653-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose LARA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 11-40129
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Oct. 1, 2012.
    Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    
      Margaret Loraine Schmucker, Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Jose Lara, Three Rivers, TX, pro se.
    Before BARKSDALE, CLEMENT, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Jose Lara appeals from his guilty-plea conviction of attempting to export more than 500 rounds of ammunition from the United States to Mexico. Lara contends the district court erred in determining his offense subjected him to a higher base-offense level of 26 under Guideline § 2M5.2(a)(l). He asserts the district court read Guideline § 2M5.2(a)(2) too narrowly, and the lower base-offense level of 14 is warranted because: (1) his offense involved only ammunition and not firearms; and (2) the ammunition at issue was designed only for .857 and .38 caliber, non-fully-automatic small arms. He contends his position is supported by the 2011 amended version of Guideline § 2M5.2.

Our court recently rejected materially indistinguishable arguments in United States v. Diaz-Gomez, 680 F.3d 477, 479-82 (5th Cir.2012).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.