Case ID: so2d_864/html/0585-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Norton BLOOM, Appellant, v. Sandra KONNER, Appellee.
    No. 3D02-3226.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Feb. 4, 2004.
    Ruden, MeClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell and John H. Pelzer and Kristie J. Myers, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    Akerman Senterfitt and David R. Car-lisle and Nancy A. Copperthwaite, Miami, for appellee.
    Before COPE, GODERICH and FLETCHER, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Given that the appellant’s noncompliance with the court order regarding the deposit was called to the attention of appellant in ample time to cure the deficiency, and he did not do so, we conclude that the trial court acted within its discretion in enforcing the explicit terms of its earlier order. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1203 (Fla.1980).

Affirmed.