Case ID: so2d_188/html/0293-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James BIVINS, Petitioner, v. TALLAHASSEE MOTORS, INC., Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company and F. I. C., Respondents.
    No. 35342.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    July 8, 1966.
    Wilfred C. Varn, of Ervin, Pennington, Varn & Jacobs, Tallahassee, for petitioner.
    Robert D. Canada, of Hall, Hartwell, Hall & Canada, Tallahassee, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 18, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is, therefore, dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

Claimant’s motion for attorney’s fees also is denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.