Case ID: f-appx_697/html/0618-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Antonio LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-11940 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    (August 29, 2017)
    Sandra J. Stewart, George L. Beck, Jr., Tommie Brown Hardwick, Curtis Ivy, Jr., U.S. Attorney’s Office, Montgomery, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Before HULL, MARCUS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Thomas M. Goggans, retained counsel for Christopher Antonio Lewis in this appeal from the denial of Lewis’s 18 U.S.C. § 3682(c)(2) motion for a reduction in sentence, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the order denying Lewis’s motion is AFFIRMED.