Case ID: ga-app_33/html/0080-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bell, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

15086.
    Ost v. Merchants & Farmers Bank et al.
    
    Decided November 13, 1924.
    Complaint; from city court of Jesup—Judge M. Price presiding. September 8, 1923.
    
      Gibbs & Turner, J. H. Quarterman, Parker & Parker, for plaintiff.
    
      Thomas & Walker, for defendants.
   Bell, J.

In this action upon a promissory note a verdict was found for the plaintiff, the defendant filed a motion for a new tidal, which the court granted, and the plaintiff excepted. Held: 'Under the ruling of the Supremo Court in answer to a question certified, the evidence demanded a finding in favor of the plaintiff, and the trial court erred in granting a new trial. The material facts as disclosed by the evidence are embraced in the certified question. See Ost v. Merchants & Farmers Bank, 159 Ga. 200 (124 S. E. 883).

Judgment reversed.

Jenldns, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.