Case ID: conn-app_82/html/0903-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FERNANDO SOTO v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
    (AC 24135)
    Schaller, West and DiPentima, Js.
    Submitted on briefs January 23 —
    officially released April 20, 2004
   Per Curiam.

The habeas court denied the petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus and his petition for certification to appeal to this court. After a careful review of the record and briefs, we conclude that the petitioner has not demonstrated that the issues are debatable among jurists of reason, that a court could resolve the issues in a different manner or that the questions raised deserve encouragement to proceed further. See Simms v. Warden, 230 Conn. 608, 616, 646 A.2d 126 (1994); see also Lozada v. Deeds, 498 U.S. 430, 432, 111 S. Ct. 860, 112 L. Ed. 2d 956 (1991).

The appeal is dismissed.