Case ID: ga-app_15/html/0632-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Russell, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

6005.
    Polston v. The State.
    Decided January 20, 1915.
    Accusation of gaming; from city court of Carrollton—Judge Beall. November 11, 1914.
    
      Newell & Spradlin, Adamson & Brown, for plaintiff in error.
    
      G. B. Boop, solicitor, contra.
   Russell, C. J.

1. An acknowledgment of service merely takes the place of service and entry of service by the sheriff, and is evidence that the physical paper was served (Toole v. Geer, 12 Ga. App. 409, 77 S. E. 368) ; and a motion to dismiss a bill of exceptions on the ground that the copy thereof remaining in the clerk’s office shows that no service was perfected or acknowledged, and that counsel has no “recollection” of having „been served or having acknowledged service, will avail the movant nothing, when the original bill of exceptions shows an acknowledgment of service, and there is no evidence of any character tending to dispute the truth of such acknowledgment.

2. A plea of guilty may, as a matter of right, be withdrawn before sentence. Bearden v. State, 13 Ga. App. 264 (79 S. E. 79); Penal Code, § 971. See Also Griffin v. State, 12 Ga. App. 615 (77 S. E. 1080). It was therefore error for the court to refuse to allow the defendant to withdraw his plea of guilty, upon a proper motion made before judgment-was pronounced, no matter what may have been the reasons actuating the defendant in withdrawing h.is plea.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, J., not presiding.