Case ID: fla_125/html/0304-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

H. S. Smith, et al., v. S. L. Ditto.
    169 So. 924.
    Division B.
    Opinion Filed September 21, 1936.
    
      Stewart & Presson, for Appellants;
    
      
      E. Dixie Beggs, for Appellee.
   Pee Curiam.

— The appeal brings for review final decree in suit to foreclose a mortgage.

There are assignments of error and cross assignments of error.

The real question involved is simply whether or not there is substantial evidence to support the decree, which question we must answer in the affirmative and affirm the decree. •

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis, P. J., and Teeeell and Bufobd, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, C. J., and Beown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.