Case ID: f3d_23/html/1497-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert PITNER, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David M. HANSON, Defendant-Appellant.
    Nos. 90-10299, 90-10318.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    May 4, 1994.
    J. Frank McCabe, Goorjian & McCabe, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellant Robert Pitner.
    Juliana Drous, Tamburello, Hanlon & Brescianai, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellant David Hanson.
    
      Eric J. Swenson, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, CA, for plaintiff-appellee.
    Before: HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, Senior District Judge.
    
      
      The Honorable James M. Bums, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation.
    
   ORDER

Upon consideration of the Supreme Court’s decision in Pitner v. United States, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 873, 127 L.Ed.2d 70 (1994), and Hanson v. United States, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 873, 127 L.Ed.2d 70 (1994), we hereby withdraw the opinion, see 979 F.2d 156 (9th Cir.1993), and unpublished memorandum, see Nos. 90-10299, 90-10318 (9th Cir. Nov. 2, 1992), in the above-captioned cases.

Further, we reverse and remand the appellants’ cases for a new trial consistent with Ratzlaf v. United States, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 655, 126 L.Ed.2d 615 (1994).

REVERSED and REMANDED.