Case ID: so2d_611/html/0115-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

INGRAM ENTERPRISES and Aetna Life & Casualty, Appellants, v. Mark LANGSTON, Appellee.
    No. 92-2079.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Jan. 21, 1993.
    Pamela L. Foels of Zimmerman, Shuf-field, Kiser & Sutcliffe, Orlando, for appellants.
    Mark A. Zimmerman, Deland, for appel-lee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek a remand in this workers’ compensation appeal, showing that a transcript of the merits hearing cannot be prepared and the parties are unable to provide a satisfactory substitute for the transcript. In these circumstances, we find we must reverse and remand the order on appeal for a hearing de novo. See Arnold Lumber Co. v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

BOOTH, SMITH and WOLF, JJ., concur.