Case ID: f-appx_110/html/0305-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Haywood Allen CANNON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lewis H. SWINDELL, IV, Individually and as a member of the law firm known as Everette and Hite, LLP; Kimberly A. Swank, Authorized agent for Everette and Hite, LLP; Hyman J. Brody, Individually and in his official capacity as authorized agent for the entity known as Birdneck Point, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 04-1450.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 16, 2004.
    Decided: Sept. 21, 2004.
    Haywood Allen Cannon, Appellant pro se.
    Lewis H. Swindell, IV, Appellee pro se.
    Lewis Holmes Swindell, IV, Everett, Warren, Harper & Swindell, Greenville, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Haywood A. Cannon appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil rights action, denying his motion for reconsideration, and imposing a prefQing injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cannon v. Swindell, No. CA-03-204-7-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 2 & Mar. 9, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED