Case ID: ga_71/html/0863-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Prothro vs. Grubbs & Camp.
    Where a person was employed to labor on a farm at a stipulated price for six months, but, by the terms of his contract, he could call, at any time during his service, for such portion of his earnings as he might require to supply his necessities, his wages were not subject to garnishment. Code, §3551; 25 Ga., 571, 025; 51 Id., 576; 46 Id., 466-8; 54 Id., 108.
    November 6, 1883.
   Judgment reversed.

Hall, Justice.