Case ID: sd_24/html/0530-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WHITING, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GIBSON v. KITTERMAN et al.
    (Opinion filed Jan. 12 1910.)
    Appeal from Circuit Court, Brule County. Hon. Frank B. Smith, Judge.
    Action by Charles E. Gibson against F. F. Kitterman and others. From a judgment for defendants, and an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeal's.
    Affirmed.
    
      W. F. Mason, for appellant. James Brown and John D. Rivers, for respondents.
   WHITING, P. J.

The questions of law raised upon this appeal are identically the same as some of those passed upon in the case of Gibson v. Smith et al. (decided at' this term of court), reported in 24 S. D. —, 124 N. W. 733. The plaintiff and appellant is the same in each case, and the defendants are claiming under the same tax deed in each case, this case, therefore, being controlled in all things by the above-mentioned case, is, for the reasons stated in such opinion affirmed.

The judgment of the lower court and the order denying a new trial are affirmed.