Case ID: misc_16/html/0679-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SUPREME COURT—APPELLATE TERM,
    MARCH, 1896.
    James Butler, Respondent, v. The Third Avenue Railroad Co., Appellant.
    Appeal by defendant from judgment of the Eleventh District Court.
    Hoadly, Lauterbach & Johnson, for appellant.
    John H. Rogan, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The return shows the usual conflict of evidence found in negligence cases.

The evidence was sufficient to warrant the justice in finding that the injuries complained of were the result of the defendant’s negligence, and that the plaintiff' was free from fault. The damages allowed were fully substantiated. .

We find no error.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Present: MoAdam and Bisohoff, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.