Case ID: so2d_757/html/1214-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BankATLANTIC, etc., Appellant, v. Charles KANTOR, et al., Appellees.
    No. 3D99-550.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Feb. 16, 2000.
    Rehearing Denied May 24, 2000.
    Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alha-deff & Sitterson and Bradford Swing and Michael C. Marsh, Miami, for appellant.
    Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler and Patricia H. Thompson and Corey B. Collins, Miami; Josephs, Jack & Gaebe and Stephanie E. Demos, Miami, for appellees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and FLETCHER, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The order dismissing the Fourth Amended Complaint with prejudice is entirely reversed upon the determination that every claim asserted by the plaintiff is sufficient to state a claim upon which relief can properly be granted against the respective defendants. See HTP, Ltd. v. Lineas Aereas Costarricenses, S.A., 685 So.2d 1238 (Fla.1996); Moransais v. Heathman, 744 So.2d 973 (Fla.1999); Pershing Indus., Inc. v. Estate of Sanz, 740 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); First Equity Corp. of Florida, Inc. v. Watkins, (Fla. 3d DCA Case Nos. 98-851 & 98-589, opinion filed, July 28, 1999) [24 FLW D1758]; Adams v. Chenowith, 349 So.2d 230 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); § 607.1106(1)(d), Fla. Stat. (1993). The cause is remanded with directions to deny the motions to dismiss and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.