Case ID: nj-eq_55/html/0588-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary A. McTague, appellant, v. Austin Finnegan et al., respondents.
    On appeal from a decree of the chancellor, whose opinion is reported in McTague v. Finnegan, 9 Dick. Ch. Rep. 454.
    
   Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given by the chancellor.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Collins, Depul, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Bogert.,- Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon — 13.

For reversal — None.