Case ID: nc_3/html/0067-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sawyer vs. Sexton's administrators.
    nnHE defendant had:pleaded several terms ago the general issue, covenants-performed &c. release 8? satisfaction, and nov? Slade moved for leav.e to, enter the plea o-f.A/cwe administravit, and after much argumentas the bar — » ' ' -
   Per curiam.

Haywood, justice, only present.

TheTinglish reporters prove this motion to be allowable and our courts have adopted the same practice the ground they go on is, that an administrator shall not be charged de bonis preprds, if at any. time before he is fixed with a judgment he offers to plead a full administration and will prove it; (he court however will not suffer him to gain any improper advantage by the motion, nor put the other party under any disadvantage by his pleading so late ; he must plead that he had no assets at the time of the suit commenced, nor at any time since wherewith he could satisfy the plaintiff's demand, or he must shew specially what assets he bad at or singe the commencement of the action. Strange, 1075, shews this to have been the practice in the English courts.

The court gave time to file the plea as moved for.