Case ID: sw2d_754/html/0027-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Omer PYATT, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 54052.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    July 19, 1988.
    Donald J. Hager, Public Defender, Steven Eugene Jordon, Asst. Public Defender, Far-mington, for appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert V. Franson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Omer Pyatt, Jr. appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court’s conclusions and judgment are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).