Case ID: f-appx_610/html/0296-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alexander Otis MATTHEWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael Richard PAUZE, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 15-6372.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 23, 2015.
    Decided: July 27, 2015.
    Alexander Otis Matthews, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alexander Otis Matthews appeals the district court’s order granting his motion to correct misfiling and dismissing his complaint alleging prosecutorial misconduct. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Matthews v. Pauze, No. 1:14-cv-00248-LO-TRJ (E.D.Va. Feb. 12, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.