Case ID: nys_29/html/1142-17.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DAVIES, Respondent, v. KALBFLEISCH, Appellant.
    (City Court of Brooklyn, General Term.
    June 25, 1894.)
    Action by Welter S. Davies against Froderick W. Kalbfleisch. Edward V. B. Kissam, for appellant. XV. Rapelyea Davies, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The exceptions at pages 12 and 18 •were taken in general language. Counsel, if he claimed that there could be no recovery for use and occupation under the pleadings, should have specifically stated the ground of his objection. Niebuhr v. Schreyer, 135 N. Y. 614, 32 N. E. 13. Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.