Case ID: nj-eq_86/html/0242-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lillie M. Brewster, respondent, v. Albertine A. Entz et al., appellants.
    [Submitted March 27th, 1916.
    Decided June 19th, 1916.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Griffin, whose opinion is reported in 85 N. J. Eq. Jfd9.
    
    
      Mr. George Whitefipld Betts, Jr. (Mr. George C, Sprague on the brief), for the respondent.
    
      Mr. Cornelius Doremus, for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree is affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Griffin. By a slip of the pen, he is made to say that he will allow a decree setting aside the assignment. As the point of the opinion is that the assignment was a forgery, the language of the decree itself is correct in adjudging that the assignment is null and void.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohakd, Parker, Bergen, Mjnturn, Kalisoi-i, Black, White, Teri-iune, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 15.

For reversal — None.