Case ID: kan_77/html/0851-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lee Martin v. The Springfield Crude Oil Company et al.
    
    No. 15,214.
    (92 Pac. 1119.)
    Error from Montgomery district court; Thomas J. Flannelly, judge.
    Opinion filed December 7, 1907.
    Affirmed.
    
      Joseph P. Rossiter, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Ayres & Welch, W. W. Padgett, W. É. Ziegler, J. H. Dana, John J. Jones, and Eugene Mackey, for defendants in error; Lee & Mackey, of counsel. .
   Per Curiam:

The question in this case is the same as that decided in Phillips v. Oil Co., 76 Kan. 783, 92 Pac. 1119, and on the authority of that case the judgment is affirmed.