Case ID: f-appx_234/html/0147-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William P. TROLINGER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. William O.E. HENRY, Chief United States Probation Officer; David Wonneman; United States Probation and Pretrial Services Offices, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 07-6269.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 18, 2007.
    Decided: July 25, 2007.
    William P. Trolinger, Appellant Pro Se. James A. Frederick, Goodell, Devries, Leech & Dann, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

William P. Trolinger appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his challenge to the application of 42 U.S.C. § 14135a (West 2005 & Supp.2007) and the order denying in part his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Trolinger v. Henry, No. 1:06-cv-01551-WMN (D. Md. Dec. 20, 2006; Jan. 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.