Case ID: wash_70/html/0699-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 10368.
    Department One.
    September 12, 1912.]
    Albert Ping, Respondent, v. J. F. Hill, Appellant.
      
    
    Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for Spokane county, Hinkle, J., entered January 9, 1912, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of tbe plaintiff, in an action on contract.
    Affirmed.
    
      Allen & Allen, for appellant.
    
      McCarthy & Edge and E. E. Cleland, for respondent.
    
      
      Reported in 126 Pac. 411.
    
   Per Curiam.

In so far as the questions involved in this case merit discussion they are the same in substance as the questions presented in Waldrip v. Hill, ante p. 187, 126 Pac. 409. For tbe reasons there assigned, tbe judgment in tbis case is affirmed.