Case ID: f-appx_696/html/0648-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John CUTONILLI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of MARYLAND, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 17-1667
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: August 24, 2017
    Decided: August 28, 2017
    John Cutonilli, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Holdsworth Bowen, Assistant Attorney General, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appel-lee.
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Cutonilli appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to amend his complaint and dismissing his claims challenging the legality of the Maryland Firearm Safety Act of 2013, Md. Code Ann., Crim. L. §§ 4-301 to 4-306 (West 2017), under Maryland’s Constitution and the Second and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cutonilli v. Maryland, No. 1:15-cv-00629-JKB, 251 F.Supp.3d 920, 2017 WL 1364753 (D. Md. Sept. 29, 2015, Apr. 14, 2017, & May 24, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED