Case ID: nys_101/html/1122-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GEIGER, Respondent, v. ROSENBERG et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    November 14, 1906.)
    Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Ninth District. Action by Aehille Geiger against Max Rosenberg and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Affirmed. Nadal, Carrere & Jones, for appellants. Edward Stetson Griffing, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The evidence of the janitor that prior to the accident he saw the hole into which the plaintiff fell was, under the circumstances, sufficient to warrant a finding of negligence by defendants. Judgment affirmed, with costs.