Case ID: ohio-st-3d_88/html/0324-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mascio.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Mascio (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 324.]
    (No. 99-1865
    Submitted December 1, 1999
    Decided March 29, 2000.)
    
      
      Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, and Kenneth R. Donchatz, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
    
      J. Craig Wright and Kirk A. Lindsey, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundbeug Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas, J., concurs in judgment only.