Case ID: f-appx_682/html/0801-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Yanique Chantel COACH, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-15864 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    (March 15, 2017)
    Michelle Thresher Taylor, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, Nicole M. Andrejko, James D. Mandolfo, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Karla Mariel Reyes, Rosemary Cakmis, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant
    Yanique Chantel Coach, Pro Se
    Before HULL, WILSON and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Stephen J. Langs, appointed counsel for Yanique Chantel Coach in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Coach’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.