Case ID: sw_169/html/1151-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HARPER, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HEIDELBERG v. STATE.
    (No. 3210.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Oct. 14, 1914.)
    Criminal Law (§ 1097) — Appeal — Statement of Facts — Necessity.
    The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction cannot be reviewed, where no statement of facts accompanies the record.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2862, 2864, 2926, 2934, 2938, 2939, 2941, 2942, 2947; Dec. Dig. § 1097.)
    Appeal from District Court, Newton County; A. E. Davis, Judge.
    Cal Heidelberg was convicted of murder, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    See, also, 159 S. W. 1187.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    
      
       For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key-No. Series & Rep’r Indexes-
    
   HARPER, J.

Appellant was convicted of murder, and his punishment assessed at 12 years’ confinement in the state penitentiary. The only ground in the motion for a new trial complains of the insufficiency of the evidence. As no statement) of facts accompanies the record, this ground cannot be reviewed.

The judgment is affirmed.