Case ID: so2d_667/html/1007-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Martin MADORSKY, et al., Appellants, v. Marcelino REGALADO, et al., Appellees.
    No. 95-1723.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Feb. 14, 1996.
    Raymond L. Robinson, Miami, for appellants.
    Lionel Barnet, Miami, for appellees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs below, Martin Madorsky, et al., appeal from an order granting final summary judgment in favor of the individual defendants, Marcelino Regalado, Carmen Re-galado, and Delio Trejo. After carefully reviewing the record, we find that the existence of conflicting affidavits demonstrates that genuine issues of material fact remain to be resolved by the fact-finder and that these issues preclude entry of summary judgment. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510; Watson v. Hahn, 664 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Goodman v. Anthony, 269 So.2d 756 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). Therefore, we reverse.

Reversed and remanded.