Case ID: ga-app_302/html/0450-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SMITH, Presiding Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

A09A2054.
    EPPINGER v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. (USA).
    (691 SE2d 331)
   SMITH, Presiding Judge.

Martha L. Eppinger appeals from the tried court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Bank of America on a claim for a deficiency on a retail installment contract.

Appellee acknowledges that the notice letter attached to its motion for summary judgment does not comply with OCGA § 10-1-36 (a), and “concedes that it has not, as a matter of law, shown compliance with OCGA § 10-1-36 [(a)]” and that “this case must be remanded to the trial court.”

Decided February 23, 2010.

Don E. Snow, for appellant.

Dennis E. Henry, for appellee.

We therefore do not reach appellant’s remaining enumeration of error.

Judgment reversed.

Phipps and Bernes, JJ., concur.