Case ID: minor_1/html/0128-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Judge Saffold.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Waters against Creagh and Shields.
    
      December, 1823.
    On a note to two executors, ecutor of the cannot join in an action ‘with the survivor.
    
      J0HM G- CREAGH, surviving executor of John Mitchell, and S. B. Shields executor of P. F. Bayard, who was 00 execut01' with Creagh of said Mitchell, declared in debt in the Circuit Court of Marengo County, against Stacy B. Waters, on his bill single, payable to Creagh and Bayard executors of Mitchell. Judgment final by default.
    
      Waters prosecuted a writ of Error to this Court; the assignment of Error on which the case was decided appears in the
   Opinion of the Court delivered by

Judge Saffold.

When there are several executors, some of whom die before the administration is completed, the interest devolves exclusively on the last survivor and his executors, if any. Toller, 44. But it is said, that the note being payable to Creagh and Bayard, they had a right, in their individual-characters, to bring an action on it. Admitting that the payees had a discretion to sue, either in their private or representative capacity, yet after the death of one, the action must be by the survivor alone, and the executor or administrator of the deceased cannot be joined, but must seek his remedy against the survivor, for the share of the deceased. 1st Chitty’s Pleadings, 10; and see 3d. Munford, 513. 1st Wash. 257.

It is therefore evident, that whether the debt be received as due to the payees in their private or representative characters, the action should have been in the name of the survivor alone.

It is the unanimous opinion of the Court that the judgment be reversed.