Case ID: so2d_804/html/0335-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gary BOHACK, Appellant, v. KELLER INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellee.
    No. 4D00-2493.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    July 5, 2001.
    Rehearing Denied Sept. 19, 2001.
    
      Kenneth D. Cooper of Kenneth D. Cooper, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    Bradley S. Fischer of Melito & Adolfsen, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order granting Keller Industries’ motion for summary final judgment. The record reveals that genuine issues of material fact remain unresolved in this case regarding, inter alia, whether Keller had affixed a duty rating label to its ladder prior to distribution. See Am. Cyanamid Co. v. Roy, 498 So.2d 859 (Fla.1986); Giddens v. Denman Rubber Mfg. Co., 440 So.2d 1320 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). These questions of fact are more properly resolved by a jury. See Moore v. Morris, 475 So.2d 666 (Fla.1985).

REVERSED.

SHAHOOD, HAZOURI, JJ., and MIHOK, A. THOMAS, Associate Judge, concur.