Case ID: sw3d_512/html/0841-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David B. CHICK, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 104537
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    FILED: March 7, 2017
    Timothy Forneris, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Mov-ant/Appellant.
    Josh Hawley, Attorney General, Nathan J. Aquino, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.
    Before Robert M. Clayton III, P. J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

David B. Chick (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment denying Movant’s Rule 24.035 claims for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).