Case ID: f_193/html/1022-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROSENSTEIN v. UNITED STATES.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
    January 2, 1912.)
    No. 1,783.
    In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
    George L. Schwein, for plaintiff in error.
    James H. Wilkerson, Harry A. Parkin, and Edwin W. Sims, •' ü. S. Atty., for the United States.
    Before BAKER and SEAMAN, Circuit Judges, and SANBORN, District Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

We find in the record no error of such substance as to require or justify an order for a new trial. Counsel for plaintiff in error,, however, have called our attention to the matter of a proposed showing that the punishment should be less in view of extenuating circumstances which plaintiff in error excusably failed to bring before the District Court. As we have no jurisdiction to adjust the sentence, and as it seems proper that the matter should be inquired into, the judgment is vacated and the cause remanded for a resentence.