Case ID: sw2d_678/html/0082-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John R. SHEFFIELD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
    No. 289-84.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.
    July 18, 1984.
    Jack Sanders, Jr., Marshall, for appellant.
    Sam F. Baxter, Dist. Atty., Marshall, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.
   APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the Court of Appeals that appellant’s conviction should be reversed. Ex parte Crisp, 661 S.W.2d 944 (Tex.Cr.App.1983). Accordingly, appellant’s petition for discretionary review will be refused. As is true in every case, refusal of discretionary review by this Court does not constitute an endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals in its opinion. Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

Appellant’s petition for discretionary review is refused.