Case ID: f-appx_683/html/0545-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Paul VIGLIOTTI Defendant-Appellant
    No. 16-3951
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 14, 2017
    Filed: April 19, 2017
    Anthony R. Morfitt, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Iowa, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Paul Vigliotti, Pro Se
    Before RILEY, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Paul Vigliotti directly appeals the sentence the district court imposed upon revoking his supervised release. His revocation sentence is composed of a ten-month prison term, plus a ten-year term of supervised release, with conditions. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief challenging Vigliotti’s supervised-release term as unduly long. Vigliotti has filed a pro se brief challenging two special conditions of supervised release, and also challenging the length of his supervised-release term.

After care&l review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Vigliotti’s revocation sentence, including the challenged aspects of the supervised release. See United States v. Asalati, 615 F.3d 1001, 1006-07 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review for substantive reasonableness of length of supervision); United States v. Simons, 614 F.3d 475, 478-79 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review for imposition of special conditions of supervised release). We affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. 
      
      . The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.