Case ID: so3d_151/html/0521-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marcus Tramaine TERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D12-4291.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Nov. 5, 2014.
    Rehearing Denied Dec. 5, 2014.
    Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public Defender, Wes,t Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and. Mark J. Hamel, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We agree with appellant that a rule 3.800(b) motion is an appropriate means for asserting an unpreserved procedural error in the sentencing process relating to whether appellant was properly habitual-ized by the court. Jackson v. State, 983 So.2d 562, 572 (Fla.2008) (citing Brannon v. State, 850 So.2d 452, 454 (Fla.2003)). Defendants may raise such constitutional challenges to a sentence in a rule 3.800(b) motion. Miller v. State, 788 So.2d 330, 331 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). However, we affirm on all other issues raised by appellant on the merits.

Affirmed.

GERBER, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.