Case ID: wis_139/html/0356-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam. Marshall, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Damman, Appellant, vs. City of Milwaukee, Respondent.
    
      February 16—May 11, 1909.
    
    
      O. Beck Co. v. Milwaukee, ante, p. 340, followed.
    Atpeal from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee county? Lawrence W. Halsey, Circuit Judge.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    For the appellant there was a brief by Kronshage, McGovern, Goff, Frite & Hannan, attorneys, and Walter D. Corrigan, of counsel, and' oral argument by Guy D. Goff.
    
    For the respondent there was a brief by John T. Kelly, city attorney, and Walter H. Bender, assistant city attorney, of counsel, and oral argument by Mr. Bender.
    
   The following opinion was filed March 9, 1909:

Per Curiam.

This case is similar in principle to C. Beck Co. v. Milwaukee, ante, p. 340, 120 N. W. 293, and is ruled by that ease. The order dissolving the injunction must therefore be affirmed.

By the Court. — It is so ordered.

Marshall, J.

(dissenting). See opinion filed in C. Beck Co. v¿ Milwaukee.

A motion for a rehearing was denied May 11, 1909.