Case ID: sw2d_938/html/0294-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joan SCHULTZ, Employee/Appellant, v. NIEMAN MARCUS, Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent.
    No. 70824.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Jan. 28, 1997.
    Gary J. Sanguinet, Brown and Crouppen, P.C., St. Louis, for employee/appellant.
    Charles W. Weinstock, Riethmann, Valentine and Rouse, St. Louis, for employer/respondent.
    
      Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Jeffrey K. ElnicM, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Louis, for Second Injury Fund.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals the denial of her claim for workers’ compensation benefits and her claim against the Second Injury Fund by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission). The decision of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).