Case ID: so2d_557/html/0247-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Susan M. NEWTON, Appellant, v. LIONEL PLAYWORLD and Crawford & Company, Appellees.
    No. 89-1686.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    March 7, 1990.
    John T. Fryback, Bradenton, for appellant.
    John J. O’Riordan, Sarasota, for appel-lees.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed a notice of appeal from a final order of the judge of compensation claims (JCC). Appellant then informed this court, by way of a motion to remand, that the tapes of the final hearing could not be transcribed. Jurisdiction was relinquished for 30 days to allow the parties to prepare a statement of the evidence, pursuant to Rule 9.200(b)(4), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Appellant now files a motion for remand for trial de novo showing that the parties are unable to reconstruct the record. Ap-pellee has no objection to the motion. The JCC has certified that a statement of the evidence cannot be prepared. Accordingly, the final order of the JCC is vacated and the cause is remanded for a hearing de novo. Arnold Lumber Co. v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

ERVIN, WENTWORTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.