Case ID: f-appx_687/html/0295-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William DEEL, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 17-6285
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 25, 2017
    Decided: April 28, 2017
    
      William Deel, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Zachary T. Lee, Assistant United States Attorneys, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinoin.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Deel appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Deel, Nos. 1:09-cr-00018-JPJ-PMS-1; 1:09-cr-00022-JPJ-PMS-1 (W.D. Va. May 9, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED