Case ID: sw3d_543/html/0084-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anthony TABORN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    WD 80540
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    ORDER FILED: March 27, 2018
    Steven B. Willibey, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
    Julia E. Neidhardt, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before Division Four: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Chief Judge, Presiding, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge
    ORDER
   Per curiam:

Anthony L. Taborn appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion and argues that it was error to deny his claim that appellate counsel was ineffective when she failed to raise a claim of error on direct appeal involving the admission of uncharged misconduct evidence at trial. Because appellate counsel's strategic decision not to raise this issue on direct appeal was reasonable, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).