Case ID: or-app_31/html/[377]-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Submitted on records and briefs September 28,
    affirmed October 24, 1977
    STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROBERT JAMES BETTS, Appellant.
    
    (No. 76A-2315, CA 8538)
    570 P2d 114
    Robert P. Coblens, La Grande, filed the brief for appellant.
    James A. Redden, Attorney General, and Al J. Laue, Solicitor General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
    Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Thornton and Tanzer, Judges.
    PER CURIAM.
   PER CURIAM.

The defendant, having been convicted upon trial to the court of a traffic crime, appeals, contending there was no evidence sufficient to make a question of fact. The testimony of one of the witnesses, if believed, was sufficient to support a finding of guilty. The trial court apparently believed that witness.

Affirmed.