Case ID: sw2d_796/html/0076-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Robert THORNTON, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. 57694.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Sept. 11, 1990.
    Thomas R. Motley, Hannibal, Raymond Legg, Columbia, for defendant/appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of a conviction in a jury-tried case finding defendant guilty of stealing in violation of § 570.030, RSMo 1986.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).