Case ID: nys_119/html/1116-09.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. McLENNAN, P. j.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BURNS, Respondent, v. STAUNTON et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    November 24,1909.)
    Action by George G. Burns against William Staunton and another.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. See, also, 128 App. Div. 907, 112 N. Y. Supp. 1123.

McLENNAN, P. j.,

dissents, upon the ground that the article was not libelous per se, and that, therefore, the plaintiff is not entitled to recover.