Case ID: f2d_711/html/0035-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John Russell WEBSTER, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees Cross-Appellants, v. The CITY OF HOUSTON, Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee.
    No. 81-2007.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    July 12, 1983.
    David L. Crawford, Legal Dept., James K. Gardner, Timothy James, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant cross-appellee.
    Harvill & Hardy, G.P. Hardy, III, Houston, Tex., K. Michael Mayes, Conroe, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees cross-appellants.
   ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion October 28, 1982, 5 Cir., 1982, 689 F.2d 1220)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, BROWN, GOLDBERG, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.