Case ID: misc_23/html/0758-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mauro Tenesei, Appellant, v. Societa Italiano Abruzzo Citro Gabriele Rosetti, Respondent.
    Appeal from a judgment of a District Court in favor of defendant.
    Sewards & Sewards, for appellant.
    Thomas J. Purdy, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The justice, in rendering judgment for the defendant, decided that plaintiff had failed to- comply with the bylaws, and furthermore, that his sickness was not such as to prevent him from working. The return fails to show whether, the by-laws of the society were admitted in evidence, but the following appears towards the end of the stenographer’s minutes:

“Articles 67 and 71, and articles 80 and 82, to be looked at.” • We assume from this that; the said provisions were considered by both parties as having been admitted in evidence, and, therefore, a copy of the same should be annexed to .the return in order that we may determine whether such .finding of the justice is supported by the evidence. For these reasons a reargument must be ordered, ‘the return to be amended meanwhile. ■

Present: Beekmau, P. J., Gildebsleeve and Giegebich, JJ.

Reargument ordered, the return to be amended.