Case ID: f-appx_488/html/0754-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Steven Louis BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Judge William KEESLEY; State Attorney General Alan Wilson; Attorney Daniel Plyler; Attorney Gregory; State Officials, only in their official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 12-7460.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 13, 2012.
    Decided: Nov. 16, 2012.
    Steven Louis Barnes, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven Louis Barnes appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barnes v. Keesley, 4:11-cv-02969-MBS, 2012 WL 2428051 (D.S.C. June 27 & July 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Although the magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation that the complaint be dismissed, the district court relied on different reasoning in dismissing the complaint.