Case ID: njl_120/html/0304-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JAMES A. SULLIVAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. EDWARD P. STOUT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Submitted February 11, 1938 —
    Decided April 29, 1938.
    
      For the appellant, James A. Sullivan, pro se.
    
    For the respondent, Edward P. Stout, pro se.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Ackerson in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Baeeerty, Walker, JJ. 16.

For reversal — None.