Case ID: f-appx_175/html/0796-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marcus Ruben ELLINGTON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 05-16441.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 8, 2006.
    
    Filed March 16, 2006.
    Marcus Ruben Ellington, Susanville, CA, pro se.
    Monica N. Anderson, Office of the California Attorney General Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA, for DefendantsAppellees.
    Before: CANBY, BEEZER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Marcus Ruben Ellington appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights action for failure to follow court orders and rules. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992), and we affirm.

A district court’s dismissal of an action for failure to comply with a court order “should not be disturbed unless there is a definite and firm conviction that the court below committed a clear error of judgment in the conclusion it reached upon a weighing of the relevant factors.” Id. (internal quotations omitted). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Ellington’s action for failing to comply with numerous court orders and rules. See id. at 1260-61.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.