Case ID: fla_121/html/0416-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frank Cummings v. State.
    163 So. 924.
    Opinion Filed October 14, 1935.
    /. J. Murray, for .Plaintiff in Error;
    
      Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant, for the'State.
   Per Curiam.

-The writ of error here brings for review judgment of conviction of manslaughter under an information charging murder in the second degree.

The only question presented is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment.

A careful reading of the Bill of Exceptions contained in .the transcript of record discloses ample substantial evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment.

Therefore, the judgment should he affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.