Case ID: ad3d_147/html/1511-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Eastbrooke Condominium, by its Board of Managers on Behalf of All Homeowners and Brighton Eastbrooke Homeowners, Respondent, v Elaine Ainsworth, Assessor, et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Eastbrooke Condominium, by its Board of Managers on Behalf of All Unit Owners, Respondent, v Elaine Ainsworth, Assessor, et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 2.) In the Matter of Eastbrooke Condominium, by its Board of Managers on Behalf of All Unit Owners, Respondent, v Town of Brighton Board of Assessment Review et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 3.)
    (Appeal No. 2.)
    [46 NYS3d 814]
   Appeal from an amended modified order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (John J. Ark, J.), entered November 18, 2015. The amended modified order granted in part the motion of petitioner to modify an order and judgment entered March 27, 2015 to the extent of designating owners entitled to refunds.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Villar v Howard, 126 AD3d 1297, 1300 [2015], affd 28 NY3d 74 [2016]).

Present — Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Curran, Troutman and Scudder, JJ.