Case ID: so2d_524/html/1173-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Barry DISNEY, individually, B. Disney International, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Micro Computer Consultants, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. DISCOUNT DRUGS, INC., Barad Holding Corporation, and Arnold Barad, individually, jointly and severally, Appellees.
    No. 87-1781.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 25, 1988.
    Marvin Quittner, Plantation, for appellants.
    Peter S. Roumbos and Elliot S. Shaw of Taplin & Howard, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

After review of the record on appeal we conclude that the trial court did not err in finding, pursuant to section 78.067(2), Florida Statutes (1987), that it is reasonably probable that appellee is entitled to possession of the disputed IBM equipment. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, C.J., DOWNEY and STONE, JJ., concur.