Case ID: pa_566/html/0212-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

779 A.2d 1142
    PANTUSO MOTORS, INC., Alfred D. Pantuso, Sr., and Judith Pantuso, Respondents v. CORESTATES BANK, N.A., Successor-In-Interest to Third National Bank & Trust Company of Scranton, Petitioner. Pantuso Motors, Inc., Alfred D. Pantuso, Sr., and Judith Pantuso, Petitioners v. Corestates Bank, N.A., Successor-In-Interest to Third National Bank & Trust Company of Scranton, Respondent.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Aug. 22, 2001.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2001, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, No. 181 M.D. Alloc. Dkt.2000, is granted limited to the following issues:

1. Did the Superior Court err by holding that the statute of limitations applicable to a cause of action under 21 P.S. § 682 begins to run anew with each new request for entry of satisfaction of a mortgage?

2. Did the Superior Court err by holding that a plaintiff who makes multiple requests for entry of satisfaction of a single mortgage may obtain an award of damages under 21 P.S. § 682 for each such request?

The Petition for Allowance of Appeal, No. 183 M.D. Alloc. Dkt.2000, is also granted limited to the following issue:

1. Whether successive demands for satisfaction of an open judgment either revive the initial cause of action or constitute a new and distinct cause of action under 42 Pa.C.S. § 8104?