Case ID: f-appx_285/html/0393-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Judge REINHARDT", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel Dean SHEETS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Cal A. TERHUNE; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 06-16755.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 18, 2008.
    
    Filed July 8, 2008.
    Daniel Dean Sheets, Pekin, IL, pro se.
    
      G. Michael German, Esq., Scott John Feudale, Esq., Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   Judge REINHARDT

dissents.

MEMORANDUM

California state prisoner Daniel Dean Sheets appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing, without prejudice, his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Vaden v. Summerhill, 449 F.3d 1047, 1049 (9th Cir.2006), and we affirm.

The district court did not err when it dismissed the action because Sheets did not avail himself of the administrative appeal process prior to filing his complaint. See McKinney v. Carey, 311 F.3d 1198, 1199-1200 (9th Cir.2002) (holding that exhaustion under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) must occur prior to the commencement of the action).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.