Case ID: f-appx_304/html/0173-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reginald Lamont USSERY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-7069.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 16, 2008.
    Decided: Dec. 22, 2008.
    Reginald Lamont Ussery, Appellant Pro Se. Felice McConnell Corpening, Office of the United States Attorney, Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renter, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM.

Reginald Lamont Ussery appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Ussery, No. 5:94-cr-00095-F-1 (E.D.N.C. June 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.