Case ID: njl_116/html/0179-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LILLY BRENNAN ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. EMANUEL E. KATZ, INCORPORATED, DEFENDANTRESPONDENT.
    Submitted October 25, 1935 —
    Decided January 31, 1936.
    For the appellants, Martin Bloom.
    
    For the respondents, Daniel De Brier.
    
   Per Curiam.

The facts in this cause bring it within and it is controlled by the conclusions of this court in DenBraven v. Public Service Electric and Gas Co. et al., 115 N. J. L. 543.

Finding no error in the proceedings below the judgment under review is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.