Case ID: nys_48/html/1116-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STRAUSS, Respondent, v. HOADLEY, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    November, 1897.)
    Action by Adolph D. Strauss and others against Russell H. Hoadley, Joshua Piza, and others. A. G. Weil, for appellant. C. Putzel, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

For the reasons assigned

in the opinion in another action, bearing the same title, and decided herewith, the interlocutory judgment should be reversed, and judgment entered sustaining the demurrer, with leave to the plaintiffs to amend upon payment of costs in this court and court below. See 48 N. Y. Supp. 239.