Case ID: cow_3/html/0298-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "The Court\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The same against Robert Chew.
    On judgment for plaintiff in ejectment, the sheriff and coroner being members of a corporation which claimed to own the premises in question, and had demised them to the defendant, and defended the action, at their own expense, through their tenant, the court appointed elizors to execute the writ of possession.
    Eliz.ors were appointed to execute the writ of possession jn this cause, on affidavit of the facts detailed in the last ¡cause, touching the interest of the Sheriff and Coroner of JVcar-Yorlc.
    
    A. Burr, for the motion, cited Co, Jjitt. 156, 157. Bac. Abr. SherijfifiM)
    
    
      M. Ulshoeffer, contra.
   The Court

said the Sheriff and Coroner had a direct interest in the execution of this process, and the motion must, therefore, be granted, without regard to the probable influence which it might have upon them.

Rule accordingly.

acexs 
      
       Substantially they were parties to the cause. (Wash. Ins. Co. v. Price, 1 Hopkins’ Chancery Rep. 1.)