Case ID: ind_17/html/0149-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.-\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Popham v. Snider.
    APPEAL from the Kosciusko Circuit Court.
    
      II. C. Newcomb and J. Tarkington, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.-

In this case, no question is raised except as to the correctness of the ruling of the Court below on a motion for a continuance. On the supposition that the ruling was erroneous, the error was waived, as no new trial was asked for. Kent v. Lawson, 12 Ind. 675.

The judgment below is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs.