Case ID: fla_81/html/0167-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Roger R. Hill, Appellant, v. E. W. Histed and Lena Belle Histed, Appellees.
    
    Decision Filed February 15, 1921.
    An Appeal from a Decree of the Circuit Court within and for the County of Palm Beach; E. B. Donnell, Judge.
    
      
      Baker & Baker and M. S. Carmichael, for Appellant;
    
      Metcalf & Blackwell, for Appellees.
   Per Curiam.

This canse having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the Decree aforesaid, and briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said Decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said Decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

All concur.