Case ID: sw2d_931/html/0881-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BOATMEN’S CREDIT CARD BANK, d/b/a Mastercard and Visa, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. William O. SCHWEITZER, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. 69493.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Aug. 27, 1996.
    Rehearing Denied Oct. 29, 1996.
    William 0. Schweitzer, St. Louis, pro se, defendani/appellant.
    William F. Whealen, Jr., Miller & Steeno, P.C., Clayton, for plaintiff/respondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff for $9,433.19. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).