Case ID: f-appx_6/html/0648-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Albert WIDMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Visuambhara WIDMER, Plaintiff, v. WITTMAN, Sheriff of Tulare County; S. Logue, Detective; Cotton, Detective; Cleek, Detective; Renteria, Detective; Gordon McClaskey, Parole Officer; County of Tulare; Chester Trow, Attorney; Richard Jumpp; Eleanor Noble; Roy Graves, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 99-16111. D.C. No. CV-98-05434-AWI/DLB.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 12, 2001 .
    Decided March 29, 2001.
    Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      . The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Albert Widmer, a Florida state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his action as duplicative of a then pending action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. See Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105 n. 2 (9th Cir.1995).

AFFIRMED. 
      
      . This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.