Case ID: njl_109/html/0413-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HYMAN HORDES, RESPONDENT, v. J. I. KISLAK, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT.
    Submitted May 27, 1932 —
    Decided October 17, 1932.
    For the appellant, John W. Ockford.
    
    For the respondent, Saul Mendelson.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court, ubi supra.

For affirmance — Teenchard, Case, Donges, Beogan, Kays, Wells, JJ. 6.

For reversal — Parker, Yan Buskiek, Keeney, JJ. 3.