Case ID: f3d_922/html/1175-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Allari GUZMAN, Defendant - Appellant.
    No. 18-3135
    United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
    Filed May 3, 2019
    ORDER AND JUDGMENT
    
      
      After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
    
   Per Curiam.

This matter is before us on the Response of the United States to Court Order of April 18, 2018, within which was a motion seeking summary affirmance of the district court's judgment. The United States moves for summary affirmance based on this court's recent published decision in United States v. Pullen, 913 F.3d 1270 (10th Cir. 2019), en banc rev. denied April 15, 2019, and the court's earlier decision in United States v. Greer, 881 F.3d 1241 (10th Cir. 2018). While the appellant does not dispute that Greer and Pullen control the outcome of this appeal and does not contest summary affirmance of the district court's judgment, he reserves the right to appeal this matter to the United States Supreme Court for further review.

In light of the foregoing, the tolling of proceedings in this appeal is lifted, and the appellee's motion for summary affirmance is granted. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.