Case ID: nys_101/html/1123-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. KRUSE, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GLEASON, Respondent, v. DELAWARE, L. & W. R. CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    October 17, 1906.)
    Action by Margaret Gleason, as, etc., against the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

KRUSE, J.,

dissents, upon the ground that the movement of the light engine by whistle signals only, which the court charged was safe and proper practice, was no evidence tending to prove the existence of the unsafe and improper practice of moving engines with cars attached by whistle signals only, without the hand flag or lamp signals, and it was error to permit the jury to consider it for that purpose.