Case ID: ga-app_23/html/0092-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

10040.
    Ridley et al. v. The State.
    Decided November 20, 1918.
    Indictment for manufacturing whisky f from Bandolph superior court—Judge Worrill. July 13, 1918.
    
      Charles W. Worrill, for plaintiff in error.
    
      B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general, R. R. Arnold, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

1. There is no merit in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

2. There is evidence authorizing the verdict, no error of law appears, and the finding of the jury having the sanction of the trial judge, under the repeated and uniform rulings of this and the Supreme Court, a reviewing court is powerless to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.