Case ID: ny-st-rep_52/html/0929-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sarah Lazarus et al., Resp'ts, v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co. et al., App'lts.
   Per Curiam.

It was the intention of the court, in the exacting the stipulation in question, that it should only preclude the railway company from instituting condemnation proceedings in case the judgment should be finally affirmed, but it would not prevent them from instituting such proceedings in case the judgment was reversed. We, therefore, see no reason for interfering with the order made, and the same should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and dis-" bursements.