Case ID: ad_245/html/0097-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York ex rel. Martin Mooney, Appellant, v. The Sheriff of New York County, Respondent.
    First Department,
    June 20, 1935.
    
      James D. C. Murray of counsel [Daniel Kirchman with him on the brief], for the appellant.
    
      Felix C. Benvenga, Assistant District Attorney, of counsel [A. A. DeVito with him on the brief; William Copeland Dodge, District Attorney], for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The privilege extended to witnesses to refuse to respond to inquiries in actions or proceedings in the courts of New York is confined by statute to communications between physician and patient, nurse and patient, attorney and his employees and client, clergyman and penitent and in some instances husband and wife. There is no other privilege extended by statute. Communications made to persons engaged in the occupation of reporter of a newspaper are not included in any statutory privilege. The court may not prescribe such privilege in behalf of a particular class. The Legislature alone may do so.

The order should be affirmed.

Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Order affirmed.