Case ID: ny_165/html/0666-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George T. Stoneman, as Assignee of Arthur G. Gray, Appellant, v. Arthur Van Vechten et al., Respondents.
    
      Stoneman v. Tan Veehten, 46 App. Div. 370, affirmed.
    (Argued January 23, 1901;
    decided February 8, 1901.)
    Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered December IS, 1899, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee and granting a new trial.
    
      Samuel S. Hatt for appellant.
    
      Henry F. Stern and Thomas A. Stoddart for respondents.
   Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for the defendants on the stipulation, with costs, on opinion below.

Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.