Case ID: f-appx_184/html/0654-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dana RUSSWORM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James A. YATES; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 05-17404.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 5, 2006.
    
    Filed June 15, 2006.
    Dana Russworm, Coalinga, CA, pro se.
    
      Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Upon review of the record and appellant’s opening brief, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court’s order denying appellant’s premature motion for prehminary injunctive relief. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record); see also, Fed.R.Civ.P. 65 (court can’t grant preliminary injunctive relief prior to service on opposing side).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.