Case ID: ga_140/html/0345-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Georgia Granite Company v. Austin.
    July ,19, 1913.
    Action for damages. Before Judge Bell. Fulton superior court. June 8, 1913.
    
      Candler, Thomson & Kirsch, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Frank L. Karalson and Robert J. Jordan, contra.
   Per Curiam.

There was no merit in the objections to the rulings of the court upon the admissibility of evidence. And though it may have been doubtful, under the • allegations of the petition, whether the charge in regard to future pain and suffering was proper, in view of the evidence and the amount found by the jury this will not require the grant of a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the- Justices concur.