Case ID: f2d_166/html/0299-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harry R. JONES v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.
    No. 9424.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
    Argued Dec. 1, 1947.
    Decided Jan. 6, 1948.
    Philip Price, of Philadelphia, Pa. (J. Peter Williams, and Barnes, Dechcrt, Price, Smith & Clark, all of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
    Joseph S. Lord, 3rd, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Richter, Lord & Farage, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
    Before BIGGS, MARIS, and KALOD-NER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Careful examination of the briefs and record and consideration of the oral arguments in the appeal at bar convince us that the court below did not commit reversible error in the admission or introduction of testimony or in its instructions to the jury. We conclude therefore that the judgment of the court below, 75 F.Supp. 855, must be affirmed. An order will be entered accordingly.