Case ID: f-appx_215/html/0570-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Julian CASTANEDA, Appellant.
    No. 06-1712.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 2, 2007.
    Filed: Feb. 9, 2007.
    Elizabeth C.L. Peterson, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellee.
    Arthur Ray Martinez, Arthur R. Martinez, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for Appellant.
    Julian Castaneda, Sandstone, MN, pro se.
    Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
   [UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Julian Castaneda appeals the 140-month prison sentence the district court imposed following this court’s remand for resentencing under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), in which he seeks leave to withdraw. We conclude the sentence was not unreasonable. See United States v. Bryant, 446 F.3d 1317, 1319 (8th Cir.2006) (when there is no dispute about applicable Guidelines range, appeals court considers whether sentence imposed is reasonable in light of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors). Further, after our review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues.

Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we affirm the sentence. 
      
      . The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.