Case ID: us_284/html/0581-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 266.
    Hanson v. Hanson.
    Jurisdictional statement submitted October 12, 1931.
    Decided October 26, 1931.
    
      Mr. John F. Hanson, pro se.
    
    
      Mr. Frank O. Johnson for appellee.
   Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied. On consideration of the unprinted record submitted in this cause it is ordered that the appeal herein be, and it is hereby, dismissed for the want of a substantial federal. question. Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600;. Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.