Case ID: nys_41/html/1116-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "FITZSIMONS, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GILLIN, Respondent, v. CANARY, Appellant (two cases).
    (City Court of New York, General Term.
    October 30, 1896.)
    Action by Robert F. Gillin against Thomas Canary.
    Joseph C. Rosenbaum, for appellant.
    Oppenheim & Severance, for respondent.
   FITZSIMONS, J.

These two actions were, on motion of the defendant, consolidated and made one action, and he now complains because judgment was rendered against him for the sum of $4,227.50, contending that in no event can a judgment for more than $2,000 be rendered in this court. This question was passed upon adversely to the appellant’s contention by this court (Bush v. Abrahams, 2 N. Y. Supp. 391) in a case similar to this one. We have examined the record carefully, and find no reason to question the judgment herein. It is therefore affirmed, with costs. SCHUCHMAN, J., concurs.