Case ID: njl_117/html/0526-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WALTER ZULINSKY, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. PETER GREENBLAT, APPELLANT.
    Submitted October 30, 1936
    Decided January 22, 1937.
    For the respondents, Andrew O. Wittreich.
    
    For the appellant, Collins & Corbin.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.