Case ID: ohio-st-3d_74/html/0592-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baldwin.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Baldwin (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 592.]
    (No. 95-2529
    Submitted January 24, 1996
    Decided February 28, 1996.)
    
      
      Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Harold F. Craig III, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
    
      Frank J. Micheli, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.