Case ID: tex-crim_151/html/0362-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel Arispe v. The State.
    No. 24010.
    Delivered February 18, 1948.
    
      Wa/yen & Kennedy, of San Antonio, for appellant.
    
      Ernest S. Goens, State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.
   HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for felony theft, punishment two years in the penitentiary. Appellant filed a motion advising this court that he desired to have his appeal dismissed. Later, for reasons satisfactory to the court he requested permission to withdraw his motion to dismiss the appeal, which permission was granted.

The case is before us on the record which contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. What purports to be a bill of exception complaining of the refusal of a continuance appears in the transcript but the bill is not approved by the trial judge. It therefore cannot be considered.

Nothing being presented for review the judgment is affirmed.