Case ID: sw3d_471/html/0801-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kenneth WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 102622
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    
    Filed: October 6, 2015
    Amy Faerber, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, Saint Louis, Missouri 63101, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 889, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent.
    Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Kenneth Wilson appeals the denial without an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Wilson raises two points on appeal: 1) that trial counsel was ineffective because he was unprepared for trial thereby rendering Wilson’s guilty plea involuntary; and 2) that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to review with Wilson surveillance footage of one of the robberies thereby rendering his plea unknowing. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). •