Case ID: neb_42/html/0052-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Ryan, C.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Reuben E. McClain, appellee, v. A. E. Morse et al., appellants.
    Filed October 2, 1894.
    No. 5627.
    Review: Bill of Exceptions: Defective Certificate': Af- ... firman ce. . The sole question being as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings of fact made by a refer.ee, whose allowance of the bill of .exceptions fails to show that it contains all the evidence adduced, the judgment of the district court' is affirmed. Following Turner v. Turner, 12 Neb., 161, and Omaha ... ,' & tN. W. B. Co. v. Menk, 4 Neb., 24. .
    Appeal from the district court of Douglas county. Heard below before Irvine, J. .
    
      Saunders & Maefarland, for appellants.
    
      ■Edgar il. Scott, contra.
    
   Ryan, C.

< This action was brought in the district court of Douglas county by the appellee,'against the appellants, for an accounting in the settlement of a partnership which had existed between the several parties litigant. By this appeal there is presented only the correctness of the findings of fact made by a referee, whose allowance of the alleged' bill of exceptions was as follows:

“This bill of exceptions contains evidence given by both parties at the trial had before me, and is by me duly allowed on presentation by the defendant Clark.
“Frank L. Weaver,
“Referee.”

This fails to show that the evidence given was all that was given; hence; it is impossible for us to review the findr ings of fact of which complaint is made. (Turner v. Turner, 12 Neb., 161; Omaha & N. W. R. Co. v. Menk, 4 Neb., 24.) The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Irvine, C., did not sit.