Case ID: nys_160/html/1125-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph BUCALOS, respondent, v. Bernhard SCHUBERT, appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    July 28, 1916.)
    Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the finding by the jury that the operator of the ear was engaged in the business of the master at the time of the casualty is contrary to the evidence.
   Jenks, P. J., and Thomas, Carr, Stapleton, and Putnam, JJ., concur.