Case ID: del-cas_2/html/0142-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DAVID WILLIAMS v. JAMES CANNON.
    Court of Common Pleas. Sussex.
    April, 1801.
    
      Rodney’s Notes.
      
    
    
      D. Hall, Bidgely, Vining [for plaintiff]. Wilson, Bayard [for' defendant].
    Question, whether a notice in writing was necessary to taking-depositions under a rule by consent.
    
      
       This case is also reported in Wilson’s Red Book, 355.
    
   Per Curiam.

From the practice, heretofore the Court will not exact it in this case it having been proved by paroi, but in future we shall exact it in writing.