Case ID: so2d_165/html/0198-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ole M. HANCOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4638.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
    June 12, 1964.
    W. D. Frederick, Jr., Public Defender, and Joseph X. Dumond, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Orlando, for appellant.
    James W. Kynes, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The record conclusively shows that the defendant was represented by counsel at all essential steps leading to his conviction and imposition of sentence and is, therefore, not entitled to hearing under the provision of Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix.

Affirmed.

SHANNON, Acting C. J., and WHITE and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.