Case ID: ad_246/html/0573-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Yvonne Alexandrine Cotnareanu and Daniel E. Finn, Sheriff of the County of New York, Respondents, v. The Chase National Bank of the City of New York and Edwin A. Lee and Others, a Copartnership, Trading under the Firm Name of Lee & Co., Appellants, Impleaded with Another, Defendant.
   Order, so far as appealed from, granting plaintiffs’ motion to strike out the first, second, third, fourth and fifth defenses contained in the amended answer of defendants-appellants, on the ground of insufficiency, affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Glennon, JJ.; O’Malley, J., dissents as to the first and third defenses in the amended answer of said defendants and votes to reverse the order appealed from in so far as the same strikes out said defenses, and to deny the motion to strike out said defenses.