Case ID: so2d_448/html/0344-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Paul F. WILLIAMS v. FIRST CITY NATIONAL BANK OF OXFORD, a Corporation, et al.
    82-1215.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    March 23, 1984.
    Charlie D. Waldrep and Greggory M. Deitsch of Gorham, Waldrep, Stewart & Kendrick, Birmingham, for appellant.
    Michael K. Wright of Norman, Fitzpatrick & Wood, Birmingham, for appellee First City Nat. Bank of Oxford.
    Jake B. Mathews, Jr. of Merrill, Merrill, Mathews & Allen, Anniston, for appellee Ray Parris.
   PER CURIAM.

Because the undisputed facts in support of Defendants’ motions for summary judgment leave no genuine issue as to any material facts and entitle the Defendants to respective judgments as a matter of law as to each of Plaintiff’s claims, we have no alternative but to affirm the trial court’s grant jof summary judgment as to each Defendant. See Hart v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation, 437 So.2d 1255 (Ala.1983).

AFFIRMED.

MADDOX, ALMON, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.