Case ID: ny3d_25/html/1083-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[34 NE3d 51, 12 NYS3d 23]
    In the Matter of Anonymous, for Admission as an Attorney and Counselor-at-Law, Appellant.
    Decided June 9, 2015
    
      APPEARANCES OP COUNSEL
    
      Tarik Davis, Brooklyn, for appellant.
    
      Maria Matos, Committee on Character and Fitness, New York City, for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Appeal dismissed without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the two-Justice dissent is not on a question of law (see CPLR 5601 [a]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey. Judge Rivera dissents and votes to retain jurisdiction on the ground that the two-Justice dissent is on a question of law and supports an appeal as of right pursuant to CPLR 5601 (a).