Case ID: ad3d_119/html/0735-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Karl Hucke et al., Appellants, v Suffolk County Water Authority, Respondent.
    [989 NYS2d 333]
   In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J), dated October 31, 2012, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs failed to establish their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1). Their submissions demonstrated the existence of triable issues of fact, including whether the injured plaintiffs fall was caused by the defendant’s failure to provide guardrails on the scaffold he was using or, rather, by the sudden loss of consciousness that he experienced just before he fell (see Munford v Pressmad Corp., 277 AD2d 135, 135 [2000]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1).

Mastro, J.P, Chambers, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.