Case ID: f-appx_411/html/0584-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Salame M. AMR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eddie N. MOORE, Jr.; Larry C. Brown; Keith M. Williamson; Nasser Rashidi; Gerald Burton; Donna Crawford; Gloria Young; Ali Mohamed; Oliver W. Hill, Jr.; Wondi Mersie; Andrew Kanu; Stephan Wildeus; Sharon Evans; American Society of Engineering Education; American Association For University Professors; Virginia State University Board of Visitors, The, Defendants-Appellees.
    
      No. 10-2041.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 10, 2011.
    Decided: Feb. 16, 2011.
    Salame M. Amr, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Clayton Fleming, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Margaret Sander, Thompson McMullan PC, Richmond, Virginia; Jeremy David Capps, Harman, Claytor, Corrigan & Wellman, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Salame M. Amr appeals the district court’s orders, both entered on August 9, 2009, adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendations and dismissing his complaint, and denying Amr’s subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Amr v. Moore, No. 3:09-cv-00667-REP, 2010 WL 3154567 (E.D.Va. Aug. 9, 2010). We deny Amr’s motions to supplement, for default judgment, for subpoenas, and for reconsideration and relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.