Case ID: nys_121/html/1148-13.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STEIN, Respondent, v. BROOKLYN ASH CAN MFG. CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    March 4, 1910.)
    Action by Samuel Stein against the Brooklyn Ash Can Manufacturing Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs, upon the ground that the evidence conclusively establishes that the contract was with Solomon Redlich personally, and not with the defendant. See Spencer v. Huntington, 100 App. Div. 463, 91 N. Y. Supp. 561, affirmed on opinion below 183 N. Y. 506, 76 N. E. 1109.