Case ID: f-appx_42/html/0661-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark F. COLEMAN, a/k/a Mark Coleman, a/k/a Mark V. Johnson, a/k/a Wakim, a/k/a Y-Kim, a/k/a Mark Coleman, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-6751.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 15, 2002.
    Decided Aug. 20, 2002.
    Mark F. Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Mark C. Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Mark Coleman appeals the district court’s order disposing of several post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Coleman, No. CR-96-325 (D.S.C. Apr. 26, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.