Case ID: f-appx_122/html/0653-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. David A. RAIMER, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 04-7691.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 24, 2005.
    Decided: March 7, 2005.
    David A. Raimer, Appellant pro se.
    Michael Lee Keller, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

David Raimer appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(b), (c) (West 2000 & Supp.2004), and his motion to reconsider that denial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Raimer, Nos. CR-98-152-3; CA-04-706-3 (S.D.W. Va. filed July 29, 2004 & entered July 30, 2004; Aug. 24, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED