Case ID: njl_102/html/0713-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOHN A. COLL, RESPONDENT, v. LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT
    Argued February 5, 1926
    Decided March 26, 1926.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N. J. Mis. R. 869.
    For the respondent, William C. Gebhardt & Son.
    
    For the appellant, Smith & Smith and Edward A. Markley.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Hetfield, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.