Case ID: ad2d_249/html/0983-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ABR-Amtliches Bayerisches Reisebuero GmbH, Respondent, v Blue Bird Coach Lines, Inc., et al., Appellants.
    [671 NYS2d 383]
   —Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in granting a conditional order of protection (see, Nama Air Cargo Co. v Unitrans Consol., 208 AD2d 604, 605; see also, Oneto v Hotel Waldorf-Astoria Corp., 65 AD2d 520, 521). The IAS Court is vested with broad discretion in supervising disclosure (see, Blumenthal v Tops Friendly Mkts., 182 AD2d 1105, 1106; Matter of Love Canal Actions, 161 AD2d 1169, 1170). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J. — Discovery.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pigott, Jr., Callahan and Fallon, JJ.