Case ID: ny_169/html/0616-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sarah C. Smith, Respondent, v. The Kingston City Railroad Company, Appellant.
    
      Smith v. Kingston Oity R. R. Go., 55 App. Div. 143, affirmed.
    (Argued January 22, 1902;
    decided January 31,1902.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 24,1900, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
    
      A. T. Clea/rwater for appellant.
    
      John J. Linson for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We think that the case was properly submitted to the jury upon both theories of. negligence on the part of the defendant, the one relating to improper construction and the other to negligent operation of the car.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Parker, Oh. J., Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.