Case ID: njl_102/html/0443-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PATHE EXCHANGE, INCORPORATED, RESPONDENT, v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF HUDSON COUNTY ET AL., APPELLANTS.
    Argued October 28, 1925
    Decided February 1, 1926.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N. J. Mis. R. 652.
    For the respondent, Edwards & Smith and Walter L. Glenney.
    
    For the appellants, Kent & Kent.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 12.

For reversal — ISTone.