Case ID: a3d_171/html/1282-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT, Petitioner v. JET-SET RESTAURANT, LLC, Respondent
    No. 327 MAL 2017
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    September 13, 2017
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. The isjsue, restated for clarity is:

Does the definition of “frequenting” set forth in Appeal of Speranza, 416 Pa. 348, 206 A.2d 292 (1965) still apply to Section 4-493(14) of the Liquor Code, or do the 2003 Amendments to the Code demonstrate the General Assembly’s intent that a minor may not be inside a licensed premises even a single time unless one of the exceptions enumerated in Section 4-493(14) applies?

Allowance of appeal is DENIED as to all remaining issues.