Case ID: so2d_323/html/0294-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert Edward DANIEL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 75-588.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 9, 1975.
    Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Mark King Leban, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William L. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
    Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted of possession of heroin and sentenced to a term of five years in the state penitentiary.

Appellant seeks reversal on the ground that the trial court erred in restricting the cross-examination of a witness for the state.

The ground relied on for reversal has been carefully considered in the light of the record and briefs, and we have concluded that no reversible error has been shown. Harris v. State, Fla.App.1969, 229 So.2d 670; Maycock v. State, Fla.App. 1973, 284 So.2d 411; patera v. State, Fla.App.1969, 218 So.2d 180.

Affirmed.