Case ID: sw3d_27/html/0844-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.'", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gregory R. WILSEY, Appellant, v. Janet E. WILSEY, Respondent.
    No. ED 76665.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Sept. 26, 2000.
    James M. Martin, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Janet E. Wilsey, Highland, IL, pro se.
    Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., and MARY RHODES .RUSSELL and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.'

Gregory R. Wilsey appeals from the trial court’s judgment dissolving his marriage to Janet E. Wilsey.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).