Case ID: f-appx_220/html/0216-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mark HEPBURN, An Incompetent, by Deborah HEPBURN, his Mother and Next Friend, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. NATIONAL CENTER ON INSTITUTIONS AND ALTERNATIVES, INCORPORATED (NCIA); NCIA/SAQ, LLC, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 06-1248.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 26, 2007.
    Decided: March 2, 2007.
    Robert A. Sapero, W. Timothy Sutton, Sapero & Sapero, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Gary R. Jones, Niccolo N. Donzella, Baxter, Baker, Sidle, Conn & Jones, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    
      Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Mark Hepburn appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hepburn v. Nat’l Ctr. on Institutions and Alternatives, Inc., No. 1:05-cv-02568-WDQ (D.Md. Jan. 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.