Case ID: f-appx_589/html/0188-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Flaubert MBONGO; Charlotte J. Dikongue, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 14-1921.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 15, 2015.
    Decided: Jan. 20, 2015.
    Flaubert Mbongo, Charlotte J. Dikongue, Appellants Pro Se. Chad King, John Sears Simcox, Simcox & Barclay, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Flaubert Mbongo and Charlotte Dikongue appeal the • district court’s order dismissing based on res j,udicata their civil action related to a mortgage modification plan under the federal Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mbongo v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 8:14-cv-01620-PWG, 2014 WL 3845443 (D.Md. Aug. 4, 2014).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.