Case ID: pa_546/html/0048-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

682 A.2d 1267
    COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Lori RISHEL, Petitioner.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Oct. 2, 1996.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 1996, the petition for allowance of appeal is granted. The judgment of sentence is vacated and case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion in Commonwealth v. Barud, 545 Pa. 297, 681 A.2d 162 (1996).