Case ID: f-appx_521/html/0163-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Quentin T. SUMNER, Senior Court Judge, Nash County; Rachel Joyner, Clerk, Superior Court, Nash County, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 13-1420.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 25, 2013.
    Decided: May 10, 2013.
    Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Arthur O. Armstrong appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Armstrong v. Sumner, No. 5:12-cv-00425-F, 2013 WL 556209 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.