Case ID: misc_30/html/0802-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nathan Hutkoff, Respondent, v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Co., Appellant.
    Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff.
    Robinson, Biddle & Ward, for appellant.
    Nathan, Leventritt & Perham, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The evidence of the witness Sammeck warrants a conclusion that the-glass was in good condition when it was delivered upon the car. .

As the defendant’s counsel upon the argument conceded that if this conclusion was warranted the judgment must be affirmed, it is-affirmed, with costs.

Present: Truax, P. J.; Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.