Case ID: pa-super_89/html/0244-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Porter, P. J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Commonwealth v. O’Hearn, Appellant. Commonwealth v. Gleason, Appellant.
    December 10, 1926:
    Argued November 16, 1926.
    Appeals Nos. 176 and 183, October T., 1926, by defendants from judgments of Q. S. Bradford County, September Sessions, 1925, No. 30, on verdict of guilty in the case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. William 0 ’Hearn and Daniel Gleason.
    Before Porter, P. J., Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn, Gawthrop and Cunningham, JJ.
    Affirmed.
   Opinion by

Porter, P. J.,

These appeals, respectively, involve only the same questions which have been considered in opinions this day filed in the cases of Commonwealth v. Hunsinger and Cominonwealth v. Dabbiero, and for the reasons in those opinions stated, the assignments of error are overruled.

The judgments in these appeals are affirmed and the records remitted to the court below; and it is ordered that the defendants, respectively, appear in the court below at such time as they may be there called, and that they be by that court committed until they have complied with the sentence, or any part of it, which had not been performed at the time their respective appeals were made a supersedeas.