Case ID: ga-app_41/html/0314-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

20284.
    Boston Dry Goods Company et al. v. Rosa Jarmoulowsky Company.
    Decided April 15, 1930.
    
      Isaac M. Wengrow, Henry II. Tisinger, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Samuel J. Boykin, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

1. The amendment to the motion for a new trial is not argued or referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and, therefore, is treated as abandoned.

2. This case was tried by the judge without the intervention of a jury. The evidence, while conflicting, authorized the judgment rendered, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.