Case ID: f2d_230/html/0952-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Neal HOEPPNER, by Walter C. Hoepp-ner, his Next Friend, Appellant, v. Nathan COON and Gail B. Coon, Appellees.
    No. 12572.
    United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
    Feb. 28, 1956.
    Frankenstein & Frankenstein, Ft. Wayne, Ind., Milton L. Farber, Columbus, Ohio, for appellant.
    Wiles & Doueher, Columbus, Ohio, Rendigs, Fry & Kiely, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellee.
    Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

This appeal from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict for the appellees in appellant’s action for personal injuries received while a patron of appellees’ bathing beach, was heard upon the record, briefs, and argument of counsel for the parties;

And it appearing that the trial court committed no error prejudicial to the appellant in the admission of evidence, the instructions to the jury, or otherwise;

It is ordered that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is affirmed.