Case ID: f-appx_675/html/0357-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alfred William LASURE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SC MENTAL HEALTH; Cynthia Helff, Program Director, Individually and in her Official Capacity; John McGill, State Director, In his Official and Individual Capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 16-7338
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: January 31, 2017
    Decided: February 3, 2017
    
      Alfred LaSure, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Albert Kinney, Jr,, Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., McKay Law Firm, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alfred William LaSure appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, as modified, and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. LaSure v. SC Mental Health, No. 9:15-cv-01357-RBH, 2016 WL 5027589 (D.S.C. Sept. 20, 2016). In light of this disposition, we deny as moot the Ap-pellees’ motion to strike LaSure’s second informal opening brief and amended informal opening brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED