Case ID: ny-st-rep_71/html/0457-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George A. Nerjes, Resp’t, v. Addie V. Roe, App’lt.
    
      (New York Common Pleas, General Term,
    
    
      Filed December 27, 1895.)
    
    Assignment—Subject-matter.
    A claim, which is not to accrue until the happening of a future event, is not assignable before the happening of such event.
    Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff.
    David Levy, for app’lt;
    P. C. Talman, for resp’t.
   PER CURIAM.

It is obvious, from an examination of the lease under which the plaintiff claims, that the tenant’s damages were to be measured by the number of days during which his occupancy was deferred, and the -amount deducted, at an agreed rate, from the accruing rent. Here there was no occupancy whatsoever, and the tenant could look to the advance payment of the three, months’ rent only at the end of that period. The assignment of his “claim” against the lessor by the tenant to this plaintiff at the beginning of the second month was valueless as a transfer of a right of action, for there was no existing claim at that time. At the end of -the three months, the tenant would have had a cause of action for the advance rent paid, but the lease was annulled by the parties some few days after the assignment of the purported claim, the tenant then received back his full advance payment claim, the tenant then received back his full advance payment as made. Had the plaintiff delayed bringing his action until the expiration of the three months, which he did not, he still would have had no cause of action, since the contract was no longer in existence at that time.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed.