Case ID: f3d_208/html/0918-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John D. CHAPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AI TRANSPORT; American International Adjustment Company, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellees,
    Nos. 97-8838, 97-9086 and 97-9269.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    April 3, 2000.
    R. Lawrence Ashe, Jr., Nancy E. Ra-fuse, William B. Hill, Jr., Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP, Michael Dubus, Atlanta, GA, David N. Schaeffer, Kidd & Vaughan, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    James J. Oh, Allison Zousmer Stein, P. Kevin Connelly, Martin Harris, Connelly, Sheehan & Moran, Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
   BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.