Case ID: ny_203/html/0567-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Guillaume Reusens, Appellant and Respondent, v. Oliver M. Arkenburgh, Respondent and Appellant.
    
      Reusens v. Arkenburgh, 138 App. Div. 908, affirmed.
    (Argued October 10, 1911;
    decided October 24, 1911.)
    Cross-appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 24, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court in an action to recover upon an account stated.
    
      Edgar J. Nathan for plaintiff, appellant and respondent.
    
      Herman B. Goodstein and Harry A. Gordon for defendant, respondent and appellant.
   Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ. Absent: Vann, J.