Case ID: njl_124/html/0131-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HORTENSE SALSBURY, RESPONDENT, v. BORO BUSSES CORPORATION, APPELLANT.
    Submitted October 27, 1939
    Decided January 25, 1940.
    For the appellant, Quinn & Doremus.
    
    For the respondent, Thomas P. McKenna.
    
   Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchakd, Case, Bodine, Hehee, Perskie, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Woles-Keil, Raeeeety, Hague, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.