Case ID: ill-app_195/html/0579-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Maria Peters, Defendant in Error, v. John A. Reddy and Fanny Reddy, Plaintiffs in Error.
    Gen. No. 21,044.
    (Not to be reported in full.)
    Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John R. Newcomer, Judge, presiding.
    Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1915.
    Affirmed.
    Opinion filed December 21, 1915.
    Rehearing denied January 4, 1916.
    
      Abstract of the Decision.
    Bills and notes, § 440
      
      —when evidence sufficient to sustain judgment. In an action to recover on a promissory note, judgment for plaintiff held sustained by the evidence as against defendants’ claim of want of consideration.
    Statement of the Case.
    Action by Maria Peters, plaintiff, against John A. Reddy and Fanny Reddy, defendants, in the Municipal Court of Chicago, to recover on a promissory note. To reverse a judgment for plaintiff, defendants prosecute this-writ of error.
    King, Brower & Hurlbut, for plaintiffs in error.
    John Lace, for defendant in error; Rankin & Dunn and Ode L. Rankin, of counsel.
    
      
      See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.
    
   Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.