Case ID: nj_18/html/0104-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WALTER R. HOBLITZELL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. W. FRANCK HOWARD, WILLIAM C. HOBLITZELL, H. O. B. MOTORS, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, JOHN E. TOOLAN AND JOSEPH J. SEAMAN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.
    Argued March 21, 1955 —
    Decided March 28, 1955.
    
      Mr. George F. Hetfield argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant, cross-respondent (Messrs. Hetfield and Het field, attorneys).
    
      Mr. Meyer F. Ruback argued the cause for the defendants-respondents, cross-appellants, W. Franck Howard, William C. Hoblitzell, John E. Toolan and Joseph G. Seaman (Messrs. Ruback, Albach and Weisman, attorneys).
    
      Mr. Daniel G. Kasen argued the cause for the defendant-respondent, cross-appellant, H. O. B. Motors, Inc., (Messrs. Kasen, Schnitzer and Kasen, attorneys).
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Ereund in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Wachenfeld, Jacobs and Brennan — 5.

For affirmance of disallowance of counsel fees to plaintiff and for reversal with instructions to enter judgment for defendants — Justices Oliphant and Burling — 2.