Case ID: iowa_65/html/0591-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Reed, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Pontius v. Winebrenner. (Two cases.)
    1. Constitutional Law: Chap. 143, laws of 1884. Littleton v. Frits, ante, p.- 488, followed.
    
      Appeal from Marshall District Cou/rt.
    
    Friday, March 20.
    Plaintiff brought these actions to restrain the defendant from carrying on the business of selling intoxicating liquors in a building and place occupied by him as a saloon, in the city of Marshalltown; The petitions were presented to the judge of the district court, who, after notice to defendant, and a hearing thereon, granted a temporary injunction restraining defendant from carrying on said business, and from this order defendant appeals.
    
      Parker & Childs, for appellant.
    
      Caswell & Meeker, for appellee.
   Reed, J.

The cases are in all respects like that of Littleton v. Fritz, ante, p. 488, and, following that case, the judgments appealed from are

Affirmed.