Case ID: f-appx_398/html/0319-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William J. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Defendant—Appellee, and Cantwell, Deputy; et al., Defendants.
    No. 09-55451.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 22, 2010.
    
    Filed Oct. 7, 2010.
    William J. Jones, Delano, CA, pro se.
    Peter G. Bertling, Esquire, Steve H. Shlens, Bertling & Clausen, Santa Barbara, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
    
      Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. 
        See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

We do not consider the district court’s disposition of William J. Jones’s claims because he identifies no error that he contends the district court committed and presents no argument challenging any of its rulings. See Acostar-Huerta v. Estelle, 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir.1993) (issues raised in pro se litigant’s brief but not supported by argument are deemed abandoned).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.