Case ID: f-appx_201/html/0534-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Larry D. SMITH, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 06-30115.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 11, 2006.
    
    Filed Sept. 14, 2006.
    Thomas J. Hopkins, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Tracy Staab, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: PREGERSON, T.G. NELSON, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Larry Dean Smith appeals the sentence of one year and one day of imprisonment and 23 months and 364 days of supervised release imposed following the revocation of his supervised release on a conviction for assault in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 113(a)(6), 1151, and 1153. He correctly contends, and the government concedes, that the district court plainly erred in imposing a sentence that exceeded the three-year statutory maximum set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(b)(2). We therefore vacate the district court’s judgment and remand for the district court to impose a sentence in compliance with § 3583(b)(2). See United States v. Guzman-Bruno, 27 F.3d 420, 423 (9th Cir.1994).

VACATED and REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.