Case ID: ohio-law-abs_30/html/0344-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

VAN CUREN v RYBAK, et
    Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Summit Co.
    No. 2872.
    Decided June 14, 1938
    Schnee & Belden, Akron, for appellant.
    W. E. Pardee, Akron, Hugh A. Sullivan, Akron, and Charles J. Smith, for appellee Emily Rybak.
   OPINION

PER CURIAM:

This appeal on questions of law and fact was heretofore submitted to this court, and an opinion was rendered in favor of the appellant. Afterwards, a motion for a new trial was for good cause granted, and evidence was taken upon an issue not covered in the first trial.

A reconsideration of the case in the light-, of such additional evidence leads us .to the conclusion that, on the issues joined.,- a decree for the' appellees, dismissing the appellant’s petition at her costs, should be entered. It is so ordered..

STEVENS, PJ., WASHBURN, J. and DOYLE, J.,- concur.