Case ID: ny-st-rep_63/html/0873-12.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

New York Bank Note Co., App’lt, v. Hamilton Bank-Note Engraving & Printing Co., Resp’t.
    (Supreme Court,_ General Term, First Department,
    October 12, 1894.)
   Per Curiam.

Without considering the merits of this action, we think that the special term was right in deferring the relief sought until after the questions at issue could be disposed of upon the merits at the trial. The order appealed from is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.