Case ID: f-appx_41/html/0955-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel KRAJCA, et al., Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. SOUTHLAND CORP., Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 01-16104.
    D.C. No. CV-99-00020-JBR.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted July 12, 2002.
    Decided July 24, 2002.
    Before FISHER and PAEZ, Circuit Judges, and WHELAN, District Judge.
    
    
      
       The Honorable Thomas J. Whelan, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendant dismissing their claims as barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. We affirm.

Plaintiffs raise a continuing nuisance theory for the first tune on appeal. Because they have failed to show exceptional circumstances that would warrant our consideration of this issue, we decline to address it. See El Paso City of Tex. v. Am. W. Airlines (In re Am. W Airlines, Inc.), 217 F.3d 1161, 1165 (9th Cir.2000). Plaintiffs did not raise them equitable estoppel argument on appeal, and thus this issue is waived. See Thornton v. McClatchy Newspapers, Inc., 261 F.3d 789, 797 n. 5 (9th Cir.2001).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.