Case ID: sw3d_7/html/0457-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ra Khem THOTH, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Lena Mae BRADLEY, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. ED 74368.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Oct. 5, 1999.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied. Dec. 1, 1999.
    Application for Transfer Denied Jan. 26, 2000.
    Joseph L. Bauer, Jr., Michael L. Nep-ple, Bauer & Baebler, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Carl D. Kraft, Kraft & Harfst, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s entry of judgment in defendant’s favor in accord with the jury verdict in plaintiffs negligence action. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).