Case ID: f-appx_131/html/0428-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dawn Dempsy SUTTON, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Gary L. WINKLER, Respondent—Appellee.
    No. 04-7274.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 12, 2005.
    Decided: May 17, 2005.
    Dawn Dempsey Sutton, Appellant pro se.
    Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United. States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Dawn Dempsey Sutton, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Sutton v. Winkler, No. CA-03-847-5-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 22 & June 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED