Case ID: ohio-st-3d_90/html/1446-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Tuesday, October 24, 2000
    
    MERIT DOCKET
    00-1830.
    State ex rel. Ohio Heritage Dev. Co. v. Portage Cty. Bd. of Elections.
   In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition regarding an expedited election matter and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the writ of prohibition be, and hereby is, denied.

Motee, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, J., would deny the writ based on laches.