Case ID: conn_158/html/0625-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard Jameson et al. v. Patrick Brinkley et al.
    King, C. J., Alcorn, House, Thim and Ryan, Js.
    Argued December 9
    decided December 10, 1969
    
      
      William V. Dworski, for the appellants (plaintiffs) .
    
      Manuel B. Clark, for the appellee (defendant Dignazio).
   Per Curiam.

The charge failed to distinguish between an admission and an inconsistent statement. Sears v. Curtis, 147 Conn. 311, 315, 160 A.2d 742.

There is error, the judgment is set aside and a new trial is ordered.