Case ID: ga-app_37/html/0461-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

18305.
    Scott v. Bradley, for use, etc.
    Decided November 16, 1927.
    Rehearing denied December 13, 1927.
    Complaint; from city court of Decatur—Judge Guess. May 6, 1927.
    
      Oliver G. Hancock, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Boykin & Boykin, John A. Dunaway, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

1. There is nothing in any of the grounds of the motion for a new trial that requires another hearing of the ease.

2. The court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luhe, J., concur.