Case ID: so2d_488/html/0870-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BANCO DE COMERCIO, S.A.C.A., Sociedad Financiera De Comercio, C.A., and Inversiones Credival C.A., Petitioners, v. SUN BANKS, INC., et al., Respondents.
    No. 86-505.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 13, 1986.
    Rehearing Denied June 13, 1986.
    Hornsby & Whisenand and Alberto J. Mora, Steven Kamp and Jon Weber, Miami, for petitioners.
    Bedell, Dittmar, DeVault, Pillans & Gentry and C. Harris Dittmar, Jacksonville, Conrad, Scherer & James and Valerie Shea, Ft. Lauderdale, for respondents.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The order disqualifying petitioners’ counsel is a clear departure from the essential requirements of the law as enunciated in, inter alia, Williams v. Wood, 475 So.2d 289 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Cazares v. Church of Scientology of California, Inc., 429 So.2d 348 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), pet. for review denied, 438 So.2d 831 (Fla.1983); and Perez v. State, 474 So.2d 398 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), and is therefore quashed on the authority of those decisions.

Certiorari granted.