Case ID: f-appx_154/html/0396-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Fernando M. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; Kathleen Hawk Sawyer, Director; Harley Lappin, Regional Director; R.D. Glancy, Regional Office; Harrell Watts, National Appeals; General Counsel for Federal Bureau of Prisons; Bobby Shearin, Warden; B.G. Compton, Warden; Mr. Bogdan, Associate Warden; Mrs. Bright, Systems Manager; Mr. McGorty, Food Service Administrator; Mr. Servoss, Assistant Food Service Administrator; Mr. Most, Assistant Food Service Administrator; Mr. Golub, Case Manager; Ms. Geyer, Case Manager; Officer Gambrel, Mailroom; Officer Livengood, Food Service; Officer Shiffer, Food Service; Officer Bittinger, Food Service, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 05-6601.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 3, 2005.
    Decided: Nov. 17, 2005.
    Fernando M. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before LUTTIG and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Fernando M. Smith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Bivens complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-04-2021-8-AW (D.Md. Feb. 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED 
      
      
        Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).