Case ID: so2d_200/html/0820-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Martin J. KOLACKOVSKY, Appellant, v. Hazel R. KOLACKOVSKY, Appellee.
    No. 1-205.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.
    July 11, 1967.
    Warren H. Cobb, of Kinsey, Vincent & Pyle, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
    John P. McCoy, of Black, Cobb, Cole, Crotty & Sigerson, Daytona Beach, for ap-pellee.
   PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final decree dissolving the marriage of the parties herein.

Appellant urges as ground for reversal that there was insufficient corroborative evidence introduced tending to support the grounds for divorce asserted in the complaint. We have examined the record on appeal and considered the briefs and oral arguments in this cause, and upon such consideration it is our view that the evidence as a whole, and the reasonable inferences deducible therefrom when considered in a light most favorable to the prevailing party, is supportive of the final decree appealed from.

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur. 
      
      . 24 Am.Jur.2d, Divorce and Separation, § 383; Martin v. Martin, (Fla.App.1958) 102 So.2d 837.