Case ID: ohio-st-3d_82/html/0305-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n     Lundberg Stratton, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Corporate Exchange Buildings IV & V, Limited Partnership, Appellant, v. Franklin County Board of Revision et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as Corporate Exchange Bldgs. IV & V, L.P. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 305.]
    (No. 97-997
    Submitted January 27, 1998
    Decided July 1, 1998.)
   Per Curiam.

This case concerns the valuation of parcel number 183730 as described in case No. 97-996. The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed on the authority of Corporate Exchange Bldgs. IV &V, L.P. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 297, 695 N.E.2d 743, decided today.

Decision affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Corporate Exchange Blds. IV & V, L.P. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 297, 301-304, 695 N.E.2d 743, 745-748, decided this day, I also dissent with respect to this parcel’s valuation.

Pfeifer, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.