Case ID: ohio-st-3d_69/html/0415-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

May, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Tandy Corporation, Appellee; Diamantis, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.
    [Cite as May v. Tandy Corp. (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 415.]
    (No. 93-1402
    Submitted January 11, 1994
    Decided June 1, 1994.)
    
      Nurenberg, Plevin, Heller & McCarthy Co., L.P.A, Richard C. Alkire, Jeffrey A Leikin and Sandra J. Rosenthal, for appellant and cross-appellee.
    
      William J. Coyne & Associates Co., L.P.A, Terrance P. Gravens and Michael E. Stinn, for appellee and cross-appellant.
   The judgment on appeal is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court on authority of Sorrell v. Thevenir (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 415, 633 N.E.2d 504, decided today. The cross-appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent. .