Case ID: nj-eq_72/html/0434-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James B. Duke, respondent, v. Lillian N. Duke, appellant.
    [Argued November 22d, 1906.
    Decided November 26th, 1906.]
    On appeal from an order of the chancellor, advised by AUee-Cliancellor Pitney, whose opinion is reported in 70 N. J. Eq. (4 Robb.) 135.
    
    
      Mr. Ohauncey G. Parker, for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. Linddbury, Depue ■& Faulks, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The order appealed from in this case is affirmed, for the reasons ’ stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by AUceChancellor Pitney.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Garrison, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Bogert, AJre-DENBURGH, A^ROOM, GliEEN, GRAY, DlLL-14.

For reversal—None.