Case ID: f-appx_112/html/0315-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Christopher C. DAVIS, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 02-4896.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 25, 2004.
    Decided Nov. 15, 2004.
    Ronald E. Justice, Jr., Gasperson & Justice, P.A., Hendersonville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., United States Attorney, Donald D. Gast, Assistant United States Attorney, Ashe-ville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    
      Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Christopher Chad Davis appeals his conviction for assault on an officer with a dangerous weapon, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 111 (West 2000 & Supp.2004), alleging that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction. Construing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, we find that any rational factfinder could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 80, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942). Accordingly, we affirm Davis’ conviction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED