Case ID: f2d_169/html/0982-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LONG v. DAVIS et al.
    No. 12024.
    United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
    Sept. 21, 1948.
    
      Hunter & Liljestrom, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
    Milton V. Backman, of Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellees.
    Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and BONE, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a motion granting a new trial. The appeal was taken on July 9, 1948. Appellees moved to dismiss it on the ground that the order was not a final decision, within the meaning of § 128(a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 225(a), 1946 Edition, then in effect, and hence was not appealable. The motion is well founded. Sentinel v. Dinwiddie, 7 Cir., 41 F.2d 57; Hunt v. United States, 10 Cir., 53 F.2d 333; East Erie Commercial Co. v. Denial, 3 Cir., 66 F.2d 555; Frank Mercantile Corp. v. Prudential Ins. Co., 3 Cir., 115 F.2d 496. Accordingly, it is granted and the appeal is dismissed. 
      
       Now 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291.