Case ID: sw3d_467/html/0908-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

K.M., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. MISSOURI STATE HIGHWAY PATROL CRIMINAL RECORDS REPOSITORY, Appellant, and City of Crestwood and St. Louis County Police Department, Defendants.
    No. ED 102170
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    
    Filed: August 18, 2015
    Gregory M. Goodwin, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Appellant.
    
      Clayton E. Gillette, Lathrop & Gage, L.C., 10 South Broadway, Suite 1300, St. Louis, Missouri 63102, Gregory S. Kessler, Co-Counsel, Frankel, Rubin, Bond, Dubin, Siegel & Kelin, P.C., 231 South Bemiston, Suite 1111, Clayton, Missouri 63105, for Respondent.
    Kathryn E. Linnenbringer, 41 South Central Avenue, 9th Floor, Clayton, Missouri 63105, Lawrence J. Wadsack, Lash-ley & Baer, P.C., 714 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for Defendants.
    Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

The Missouri State Highway Patrol (MSHP) appeals the trial court’s Judgment and Order of Expungement of Arrest Records in favor of K.M. MSHP argues that the trial court erred in granting KM.’s petition for expungement because K.M. did not prove the elements entitling her to expungement under the statute and that K.M. was otherwise barred from seeking expungement under the doctrine of issue preclusion. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).