Case ID: njl_77/html/0616-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PHILADELPHIA AND CAMDEN FERRY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. INTER-CITY LINK RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    Argued December 3, 1908
    Decided March 1, 1909.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 47 Vrooni 50.
    For the plaintiff in error, Gaskill & Gaskill.
    
    For the defendant in error, Marlin V. Bergen, Jr.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Garrison in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—Tiie CiiaNCEllor, Ci-tief Justice, Reed, T'RENCHARD, PARKER, BERGEN, VOORHEES, MlNTÜRN, Bo-GERT, VrEDENBUEGH, VrOOM, GRAY, DlLL, J.J. 13.

For reversal—None.