Case ID: sw2d_11/html/0505-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HARVEY, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dan E. LYDICK, Tr., v. STATE BANKING BOARD OF TEXAS.
    (No. 1103-5016.)
    Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section A.
    Dec. 12, 1928.
    Spencer & Rogers, of San Antonio, for relator.
    Claude Pollard, Atty. Gen., C. W. Truehart, Asst. Atty. Gen., and L. C. Sutton and John W. Goodwin, both of Austin, for respondent.
   HARVEY, P. J.

The Supreme Court has this day adopted the opinion of Section B of the Commission, in the case of Edwin Lacy et al. v. State Banking Board, 11 S.W. (2d) 496. The holdings , in that opinion require the same disposition of this case that is made of that case.

We recommend that the mandamus sought herein be refused.

GREENWOOD and PIERSON, JJ. Opinion of the Commission of Appeals adopted, and mandamus refused.