Case ID: ala-app_28/html/0212-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "RICE, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

182 So. 80
    SAVAGE v. NADLER et al.
    7 Div. 349.
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    April 5, 1938.
    Rehearing Denied May 10, 1938.
    Culli & Swann, of Gadsden, for appellant.
    Inzer, Davis & Martin, of Gadsden, for appellees.
   RICE, Judge.

■This appeal is from a judgment in favor of appellees in a suit brought against them, on an alleged joint contract, by appellant.

The case was tried by the court, sitting, without a jury. The rules of review are too well known to need re-statement.

The pleas were “in short by consent.” We are not sure that we understand, exactly, what is meant by that; but the issues that were litigated are simple and not difficult of comprehension from the record.

Appellees denied any joint contract; and claimed that all amounts due appellant by Mrs. Leak had been paid.

The evidence was in conflict; and we see no occasion to overturn the judgment rendered.

It is affirmed.

Affirmed.