Case ID: or-app_174/html/0393-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Submitted on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court July 13, 2000,
    reversed and remanded May 23, 2001
    RODGER ROBERT ANSTETT, Appellant, v. S. Frank THOMPSON, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent.
    
    97C-12303; A102496
    25 P3d 414
    Steven H. Gorham for appellant.
    Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Judy C. Lucas, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
    Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Landau, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The crimes for which he is incarcerated took place during the time period when the administrative rule discussed in Peek v. Thompson, 160 Or App 260, 980 P2d 178, rev dismissed 329 Or 553 (1999), was in effect. We reverse and remand with instructions for the trial court to consider plaintiffs arguments in light of Peek and in light of the standard of review enunciated in Hamel v. Johnson, 173 Or App 448, 25 P3d 314 (2001).

Reversed and remanded.