Case ID: f-appx_488/html/0513-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Manohar SHRESTHA, Renu Shrestha, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ross LELIN, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 11-5140.
    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    Nov. 15, 2012.
    
      Manohar Shrestha, pro se, and Renu Shrestha, pro se, Manorvihe, NY, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    Ross Lelin, pro se, Freeport, NY, for Defendant-Appellee.
    . PRESENT: DENNIS JACOBS, Chief Judge, JON O. NEWMAN, REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judges.
   SUMMARY ORDER

Appellants Manohar Shrestha and Renu Shrestha, pro se, appeal the sua sponte dismissal of their complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3), based on the Rook-er-Feldman doctrine. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.

Upon such review, we conclude that the Shresthas’ appeal is without merit substantially for the reasons articulated by the district court in its well-reasoned order. Shrestha v. Lelin, No. 11-cv-4851 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2011). We have considered all of the Shresthas’ remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.