Case ID: cust-ct_8/html/0507-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Oliver, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Before the First Division,
    April 30, 1942
    No. 47133.
    Protest 36757-K/89500 of W. Braun Co. (Chicago).
   Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

A bottle and unground stopper were received in evidence as exhibit 1. Appearing on the bottle were the words “Recher’s Muscatel.” The only witness in the ease, the general manager of the importing concern, testified, among other things, that the bottles filled with wine had been imported specifically for D. Recher & Co. as containers “for their port, sherry, and muscatel wines”; and that all of the bottles were of the same character and appearance excepting the descriptive lettering, some having the lettering “Recher’s Port” and “Recher’s Sherry.” He further testified that while all bottles could be used on the table, generally a bottle that is marked in a commercial manner such as this one is hardly suitable for that purpose. The court was of the opinion that the loose stopper in the instant ease does not render the bottle here involved unsuitable for holding wine, as testified to by the witness, whatever may be said of the unsuitability for transportation purposes. It was held that the uncon-tradicted testimony of this witness as to the use of the merchandise was sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s classification. It was therefore found that the bottles in question were not for table service but for the holding of wine. The claim at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 217 was therefore sustained. DeBoer v. United States (T. D. 44301) cited.