Case ID: ohio-st-3d_70/html/0075-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 75.]
    
      (No. 92-1328
    Submitted June 15, 1994
    Decided August 24, 1994.)
    
      
      Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
    
      Leroy Reuben Boykin, pro se.
    
   Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, we concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Therefore, we order that Leroy Reuben Boykin be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of eighteen months; however, imposition of this sanction is stayed on the conditions established by the panel and adopted by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent and would indefinitely suspend respondent.