Case ID: ad3d_124/html/1110-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Eric Casey, Petitioner, v Albert Prack, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
    [999 NYS2d 618]—
   Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

A correction officer observed petitioner, a prison inmate, retrieve an unknown item from a cell. After the officer ordered petitioner to submit to a pat frisk, petitioner attacked the officer and had to be forcibly subdued. Petitioner was accordingly charged in a misbehavior report with assaulting staff, engaging in violent conduct, refusing a direct order and refusing a pat frisk. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty as charged. The determination was affirmed upon administrative review, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report and related documentation, as well as the testimony of the correction officer who was assaulted, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Alsaifullah v Fischer, 118 AD3d 1239, 1240 [2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 906 [2014]; Matter of Quezada v Fischer, 113 AD3d 1004, 1004 [2014]). Petitioner maintained that he had been assaulted without provocation and that the officer’s injuries were fabricated, but his testimony presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Alsaifullah v Fischer, 118 AD3d at 1240). Petitioner further contends that documentary evidence and testimony regarding the officer’s injuries were relevant and should have been provided “absent a showing that [such evidence] would jeopardize institutional security” (Matter of Wright v Fischer, 98 AD3d 759, 759-760 [2012]). Any error that may have occurred in that regard is harmless, however, as those injuries were exhaustively detailed by other documents and hearing testimony in the record (see Matter of Felder v Fischer, 120 AD3d 858, 858 [2014]; Matter of Martin v Fischer, 98 AD3d 774, 775 [2012]).

Peters, PJ., Lahtinen, Egan Jr., Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.