Case ID: f2d_109/html/0339-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RICHARDSON v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO. et al.
    No. 9357.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
    Jan. 29, 1940.
    John H. Benckenstein and H. C. Keen, both of Beaumont, Tex., for appellant.
    Charles A. McCoy and Alvin O. King, both of Lake Charles, La., and Sumter D. Marks, Jr., of New Orleans, La., for appel-lees.
    Before SIBLEY, HUTCHESON, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

On further consideration of the motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal we are of opinion that there is no such apparent merit in the appeal as for us to waive the rule of the Court requiring printing of the record.

The motion to dismiss is sustained.