Case ID: f-appx_63/html/0144-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dora P. PETTIFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES; Carol Donin, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 02-2393.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted April 24, 2003.
    Decided May 19, 2003.
    
      Dora P. Pettiford, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Matthew Woodward, Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Dora P. Pettiford appeals the jury verdict in favor of her former employer, the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Resources, in her civil action in which she alleged retaliatory treatment based upon her complaints of racial discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. In reviewing a jury verdict, we do not weigh evidence or review witness credibility. See United States v. Saunders, 886 F.2d 56, 60 (4th Cir.1989). If, when taken in the fight most favorable to the plaintiff, there is substantial evidence to support the verdict, it must be sustained. Vodrey v. Golden, 864 F.2d 28, 30 n. 4 (4th Cir.1988). Because we conclude substantial evidence supported the jury verdict, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.