Case ID: misc_32/html/0750-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Conlan, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Max Scheuer et al., Respondents, v. Selig Rosenbaum et al., Appellants.
    Appeal from a judgment, after trial, before a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
    Rose & Putzel (Gibson Putzel, of counsel), for appellants.
    Louis Hess, for respondents.
   Conlan, J.

The simple question before us on this appeal was whether or not certain goods ordered by the defendants from the plaintiffs were delivered.or tendered in time.

Upon this question, the evidence upon the trial was in conflict, and the charge of the trial justice, to which there was no exception, clearly stated the whole case to the jury. In addition to this, the defendants, at the close of all the testimony, asked the court to submit to the jury this precise, question of delivery, and the court acquiesced. The jury determined the whole matter in favor of the plaintiffs, and we have no inclination to disturb their finding

Judgment and order appealed from must, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

Hascall and Schuchman, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.