Case ID: pa-super_222/html/0478-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Packed, J., Hoffman, J.:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Holmes v. Broodno, Appellant.
    Submitted June 14, 1972.
    Before Weight, P. J., Watkins, Jacobs, Hoppman, Spaulding, Cercone, and Packel, JJ.
    
      September 15, 1972:
    
      Thomas Holmes Goldsmith, for appellant.
    
      Arthur J. Seidner, and Jerome Taylor and Associates, for appellee.
   Opinion by

Packed, J.,

The quashing of the appeal is reversed for reasons stated in Meta v. Yellow Gab Company of Philadelphia, 222 Pa. Superior Ct. 469, 294 A. 2d 898 (1972).

Dissenting Opinion by

Hoffman, J.:

I dissent for the same reasons as set forth in my opinion in Meta v. Yellow Cab Company of Philadelphia, 222 Pa. Superior Ct. 469, 294 A. 2d 898 (1972).

Watkins and Jacobs, JJ., join in this dissenting opinion.