Case ID: misc_2/html/0572-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dttgeo, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NEW YORK SUPERIOR COURT
    GENERAL TERM,
    JANUARY, 1893.
    Henschel v. Harlem Reporter Co. et al.
    
      William G. Me Crea, for plaintiff (respondent).
    
      Charles W. Dayton, for defendant (appellant).
   Dttgeo, J.

A careful examination of the papers fails to show any improper exercise of discretion by the court at Special Term. The original complaint sufficed for one kind of relief. The supplemental complaint is but for more extensive relief. Latham v. Richards, 15 Hun, 129.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.

Sedgwick, Oh. J., and Gtldeksleeve, J., concur.

Order affirmed.