Case ID: f-appx_670/html/0077-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Morris SPEIGHT-BEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles WILLIAMS, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 16-6895
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: October 18, 2016
    Decided: October 21, 2016
    Morris Speight-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Morris Speight-Bey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his original 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and opening a new case with his refiled § 2241 petition, which remains pending below. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Speight-Bey v. Williams, No. 3:16-cv-00069-GMG-MJA (N.D. W. Va. June 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED