Case ID: f-appx_234/html/0510-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, Petitioner-Appellee, v. John M. KEEFE, Esq., Respondent-Appellant.
    No. 05-36217.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 5, 2007 .
    Filed June 11, 2007.
    Marsha A. Matsumoto, Esq., Washington State Bar Association, Seattle, CA, for Petitioner-Appellee.
    John M. Keefe, Esq., South Pasadena, CA, pro se.
    Before: LEAVY, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

John M. Keefe, Esq., appeals pro se from the district court’s order remanding to state court the disciplinary and disability proceedings brought against him by the Washington State Bar Association. We dismiss the appeal.

We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s remand order because that order was based on its determination, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); United Investors Life Ins. Co. v. Waddell & Reed Inc., 360 F.3d 960, 963 (9th Cir.2004); see also Seedman v. U.S. Dist. Court for Cent. Dist. of California, 837 F.2d 413, 414 (9th Cir.1988) (per cu-riam) (prohibition on the review of remand orders extends to the district court’s own ability to entertain a motion for reconsideration).

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.