Case ID: f-appx_589/html/0204-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kenneth Valentine AWE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Harold Clarke; Randall MATHENA, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 14-7137.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 15, 2015.
    Decided: Jan. 20, 2015.
    Kenneth V. Awe, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Valentine Awe appeals the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2012), and denying his motion to alter or amend. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,' we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Awe v. Clarke, No. 7:14-cv-00248-JLK-RSB (W.D.Va. July 3 & 18, 2014). We deny Awe’s motion for counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.