Case ID: f-appx_492/html/0041-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco MEZA-GARCIA, a.k.a. Paco, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 11-13292
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Oct. 11, 2012.
    Joseph A. Cooley, Anne Ruth Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Paul D. Petruzzi, Law Offices of Paul Petruzzi, PA, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    
      Francisco Meza-Garcia, Post, TX, pro se.
    Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and FAY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Paul Petruzzi, counsel for Francisco Meza-Garcia in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Meza-Garcia’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.