Case ID: f-appx_141/html/0205-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MORRIS LAW OFFICE, P.C., a Virginia Professional Corporation, Plaintiff—Appellee, and Tee Engineering Company, Incorporated, a Kentucky Corporation, Defendant—Appellee, v. James Eddie TATUM; Ann Tatum, Defendants—Appellants.
    No. 05-1241.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 15, 2005.
    Decided Aug. 24, 2005.
    James Eddie Tatum and Ann Tatum, Appellants Pro Se. Walton Davis Morris, Jr., Charlottesville, Virginia, Peter Booth Vaden, Charlottesville, Virginia; David Brian Rubinstein, Fredericksburg, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

James Eddie Tatum and Ann Tatum appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting, in part, the Morris Law Office’s motion for summary judgment and Tee Engineering’s motion for summary judgment. We find that the Ta-tums failed to file timely objections to the magistrate judge’s report and have therefore waived appellate review of the substance of the recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985); Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir.1985). Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED