Case ID: njl_102/html/0225-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM MALAY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted May 29, 1925
    Decided September 10, 1925.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N. J. Mis. R. 235.
    Por the plaintiff in error, Elmer W. Romine.
    
    For the defendant in error, James H. Bolitho, prosecutor of the pleas.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion in the Supreme Court.

For affirmanee — Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.