Case ID: so2d_616/html/0631-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael PARKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-2081.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    April 21, 1993.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tanja Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Melvina Racey Flaherty, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Although the state concedes that the trial court erred in refusing to allow appellant to adduce testimony challenging the voluntariness of his statement to a sheriff’s detective, see Palmes v. State, 397 So.2d 648 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 882, 102 S.Ct. 369, 70 L.Ed.2d 195 (1981), the error was harmless in this case. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). We find no error in appellant’s sentence.

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and WARNER,. JJ., concur.