Case ID: ohio-st-3d_17/html/0043-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Klunk.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Klunk (1985), 17 Ohio St. 3d 43.]
    (D.D. No. 84-19
    Decided April 24, 1985.)
    
      
      Angelo J. Gagliardo, disciplinary counsel, and Carl J. Corletzi, for relator.
   Per Curiam.

Upon a review of the record herein, it is the determination of the court that respondent has violated DR 1-102(A)(1), DR 1-102(A)(3), DR 1-102(A)(4) and DR 1-102(A)(6), and we hereby accept the recommendation of the board of commissioners.

Therefore, it is the order of the court that respondent be permanently disbarred from the practice of law in the state of Ohio. The court further orders that the costs of these proceedings shall be taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.