Case ID: f2d_15/html/1018-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary R. ROULLOT, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, and William McDonald and Annie McDonald, as Administrators, Defendants in Error.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    November 19, 1926.)
    No. 84.
    In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
    Wood, Molloy & Prance, of New York City (Melville J. Prance, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.
    Emory R. Buckner, U. S. Atty., of New York City (John M. Ryan, Asst. U. S. Atty., and James T. Brady, both of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.
    Dills & Towsley, of New York City (Prank H. Towsley, of New York City, of counsel), for administrators.
    Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

In principle this ease is

governed by United States v. Sterling (C. C. A.) 12 F.(2d) 921.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.