Case ID: f-appx_700/html/0274-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Reina Marisol Ramos DE CHACON; V.K.C.R.; A.J.C.R., Petitioners, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 17-1441
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: October 27, 2017
    Decided: November 3, 2017
    Abdoul Konare, KONARE LAW, Frederick, Maryland, for Petitioners. Chad A. Readier, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Anthony W. Norwood, Senior Litigation Counsel, Greg D. Mack, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Before ÑIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Reina Marisol Ramos De Chacon and her two daughters, natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing their appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of De Chacon’s application for asylum. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of De Chacon’s merits hearing before the immigration court and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED