Case ID: so2d_240/html/0321-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GENERAL DISTRIBUTOR CORPORATION, Appellant, v. CURTISS NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI SPRINGS, Appellee.
    No. 69-1071.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 27, 1970.
    Rehearing Denied Nov. 18, 1970.
    Jerry Larotonda, Miami, for appellant.
    Broad & Cassel, and Lewis Horwitz, Miami Beach, for appellee.
    Before PEARSON, C. J., and HEN-DRY and SWANN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The appellant sued the appellee alleging a conversion of personal property. This appeal is from a final judgment for the defendant. The judgment was entered after a trial before the court sitting without a jury. The only point presented on this appeal is simply that the trial judge made a wrong determination upon the facts. We affirm the judgment upon the rule that where the judgment is reasonably supported by facts in the record, an appellate court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court. Old Equity Life Ins. Co. v. Levenson, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 50.

Affirmed.