Case ID: nys_92/html/1130-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SCOTT, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JAMES McCREERY & CO., Appellants, v. OPPENHEIM et al., Respondents.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    February 28, 1905.)
    Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Sixth District. Action by James Mc-Creery & Co. against Albert P. Oppenheim and others. From a judgment for defendants, after a trial before the court without a jury, plaintiffs appeal. Reversed. Gould & Wilkie (Arthur F. Gotthold, of counsel), for appellants. Bandler & Haas, for respondents.
   SCOTT, J.

Whatever may have been the actual agreement between Sadie Jacobs and the defendants, it was not communicated to plaintiffs/ I think that under the circumstances disclosed by the evidence the defendants are estopped from denying responsibility for the amount sued for. The whole arrangement seems to have been devised with a view to giving Miss Jacobs credit on the faith of her apparent connection with defendants, and yet at the same time to leave an avenue of escape open in case of need. The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. All concur.