Case ID: monaghan_2/html/0664-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mercur, C. J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Morrison v. Bachert.
    Only one counsel will be heard in argument of a case in the supreme court, where there is no appearance for defendant in error and no argument to which to make reply.
    March 9, 1888.
    March 9, 1886.
    Upon argument of Morrison v. Bachert, error to C. P. Northampton Co., No. 204, Jan. T., 1886, reported in 112 Pa. 322. Before Mercur, C. J., Gordon, Paxson, Trunkey, Sterrett and Green, JJ. Clark, J., absent.
    
      H. J. Steele, with him Russell C. Stewart, Carroll R Williams, R. Jones Monaghan and James Monaghan, for plaintiff in error.
    No counsel appeared for defendant in error.
   Mercur, C. J.,

As there is no appearance for defendant in error and no argument to reply to, we can hear only one counsel in argument.

See, also, the next case.