Case ID: f_237/html/1020-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

REITZER et al. v. MEDINA VALLEY IRR. CO.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    December 15, 1916.
    Rehearing Denied January 9, 1917.)
    No. 2980.
    In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas; Wm. B. Sheppard, Judge.
    C. L. Bass, of San Antonio, Tex. (T. T. Vander Hoeven, of San Antonio, Tex., on the brief), for plaintiffs in efcror. Wm. Aubrey, of San Antonio, Tex. (West & McMillan, of San Antonio, Tex., on the brief), for defendant in error.
    Before PARDEE and WALKER, Circuit Judges, and FOSTER, District Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

By uncontradieted evidence, admitted on the trial without objection, it was shown that the defendants had estopped themselves to deny the right of the plaintiff to acquire the land in question by condemnation. This fact renders unavailable many of the assignments of error which have been insisted 'on in argument. Our examination of the record in the light of the arguments and briefs has led us to the conclusion that it does not show that any reversible error was committed. The judgment is affirmed.