Case ID: so2d_664/html/0017-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carl McCOY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 95-3005.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 8, 1995.
    Carl McCoy, in pro. per.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before HUBBART, LEVY and GREEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Based upon our review of the record, we find appellant’s argument that his written judgment and sentence as a habitual offender did not conform with the trial court’s oral pronouncement of sentence to be wholly without merit. The trial court’s denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence therefore was not error.

Affirmed.