Case ID: sw_240/html/0309-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HAWKINS, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LOWE v. STATE.
    (No. 6905.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    April 26, 1922.)
    Criminal law &wkey;>i 144(10, 13) — Court will presume trial properly conducted and verdict supported by evidence in absence of bills of exception and statement of facts.
    The Court of Criminal Appeals, in the absence of bills of exception and statement of facts, must presume that the trial was conducted in an orderly way, and that the verdict is supported by the evidence.
    Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; Robert B. Seay, Judge.
    Walter Lowe was convicted of robbery, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      R. G. Storey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for robbery, punishment being assessed at five years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts or bills of exception accompany the record. The indictment charges an offense under the statute, and, in the absence of bills of exception or statement of facts, we must presume the -trial was conducted in an orderly way, and that the verdict is supported by the evidence.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.