Case ID: njl_73/html/0681-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. RUDOLPH F. HARNED, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted December 12, 1905
    Decided June 18, 1906.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    Eor the plaintiff in error, Samuel Kalisch.
    
    Eor the defendant in error, Samuel A. Atkinson, prosecutor of the pleas.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment brought up by this writ of error is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Port, in the Supreme Court, in the case of State v. Davis, reported in 43 Vroom 345.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill. 12.

For reversal — None.