Case ID: f-appx_13/html/0069-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nelson BRADLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Douglas VARGO; Alphonso Hicks; Marvin Lee; David Garraghty, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 01-6489.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted May 31, 2001.
    Decided June 11, 2001.
    Nelson Bradley, pro se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for appellees.
    Before WILKINS, TRAKLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Nelson Bradley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bradley v. Vargo, No. CA-99-1230-2 (E.D.Va. Feb. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.