Case ID: conn-app_13/html/0752-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John G. Burgdorf et al. v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of South Windsor
    (5535)
    Borden, O’Connell and Stoughton, Js.
    Argued January 6 —
    decision released February 10, 1988
    
      Ralph J. Alexander, town attorney, with whom, on the brief, was Richard M. Rittenband, former town attorney, for the appellant (defendant).
    
      
      Ronald P. Sherlock, with whom, on the brief, was James W. Sherman, for the appellees (plaintiffs).
   Per Curiam.

Subsequent to the oral argument in this appeal, the plaintiffs moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground of mootness. On the basis of the briefs of the parties on the motion, and on the hearing held thereon, we conclude that the appeal is moot.

The plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss is granted; the appeal is dismissed.