Case ID: del_4/html/0284-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOSEPH I. LYNCH’S Executrix vs. NATHANIEL TUNNELL, p. b.
    Judgment cannot be entered by a justice of the peace on a judgment note after the death of the maker" of the note. . .
    The authority given to enter such judgment is revoked by death; and does not extend to authorize a judgment against the executor. .
    Certiorari to Justice Steel.
    The record showed that the judgment in this case was rendered by a justice of the peace against Mary W. Lynch, as administratrix of Joseph I. Lynch, on a judgment note given by the said Joseph I. Lynch in his life time to Nathaniel Tunnell; with authority to any justice of the peace within the State of Delaware to enter judgment before him against the maker.
    On this note was endorsed a regular probate by Nathaniel Tunnell, made before the justice on the 27th of November, 1843, that nothing had been paid or delivered towards satisfaction of the same, and that the sum demanded, viz., $7'42, was justly and truly due. Whereupon justice Steel, on the 3d of August, 1844, and after the death of Joseph 1. Lynch, entered a judgment against Mary W. Lynch, his administratrix, for the amount of the note.
    
      This was the principal error assigned, that the justice had no power to enter judgment upon the warrant of attorney given by Joseph I. Lynch after his death; nor did the entry of judgment against his executrix conform to the authority given to enter a judgment against him.
    
    And for this reason the court set aside the judgment and proceedings. These authorities must be strictly followed, and the judgments rendered in pursuance of them must be entirely conformable to them. The death of Joseph. F¡ Lynch was a revocation of the power of attorney to confess judgment; and the remedy, after that, was by action upon the note in the ustial form against the executrix.
    
      Layton, for the defendant below.
   Judgment reversed.