Case ID: sw3d_464/html/0280-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Phillip D. MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    WD 77516
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    ORDER FILED: June 30, 2015
    Susan Hogan, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant
    Rachel Flaster, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent
    Before'Division One: James Edward Welsh, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, and Karen King Mitchell, JJ.
   ORDER

Per Curiam:

Mr. Phillip D. Martin appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion. He claims' that he was forced to plead guilty to the charged offenses because defense counsel failed to prepare for trial.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).