Case ID: dc_1/html/0569-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "The CouRT", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

De Butts v. Bacon et al.
    
    At the hearing of a cause in chancery, the Court will not receive viva voce testimony unless to prove an exhibit.
    
      Mr. Swann, for the plaintiff,
    offered, at the hearing, to prove certain papers not made exhibits; and cited the 30th section of the Judiciary Act of 1789. [1 Stat. at Large, 88.]
    The cause was set for hearing upon the bill, answer, replication, exhibits, and depositions.
    
      Mr. C. Lee stated it to be the practice in the federal courts to examine witnesses at the hearing, and to have the evidence taken down in writing by the clerk.
    
      Mr. Youngs, contra.
    
    Where the evidence has been taken in the usual mode by commission, and the cause set for hearing, no evidence taken afterwards can be received unless by consent or the special order of court. Virginia law, 1792, November 29, § 46, p. 67; 1 Har. Ch. Pr. 595.
   The CouRT

refused to suffer viva voce testimony to prove a letter, produced by the plaintiff at the hearing, not being an exhibit referred to by the bill or answer.

The Court had some doubt upon the 30th section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, but as the practice both here and in Maryland •has been not to receive the testimony at the hearing, and having so decided in the case of Harper & Lyles v. Marine Insurance Company, at the last term, in a full court, they rejected the testimony. See the 12th Rule of practice in this Court.