Case ID: nj_51/html/0006-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Ctjeiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MOE GREEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, AND JEAN GREEN, PLAINTIFF, v. BUCK BROTHERS CO., AND JOHN R. HAMILTON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS, v. ROSEMARY DAWICKI, ET AL., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS.
    Argued December 19,1967
    Decided December 22,1967.
    
      Mr. John A. Gleeson for appellants (Messrs. Mead, Glee-son, Hansen & Pantages, attorneys; Messrs. Gassert and Murphy, of counsel; Mr. Joseph A. Gtarhen, Jr., on the brief).
    
      Mr. Julius B. Poppinga for respondent (Messrs. Seaman, Williams & Seaman, attorneys; Messrs. McGorler & English, of counsel).
   Pee Ctjeiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Leonard in the Appellate Division, 98 N. J. Super. 187.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weinteatjb and Justices Jacobs, Eeakcis, Peootoe, Goldmark, Schettino and Hanemak—7.

For reversal—None.