Case ID: ny-2d_52/html/0916-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Shiseido Cosmetics (America) , Ltd., et al., Respondents, v State Human Rights Appeal Board et al., Respondents, and Joan C. Laufer, Appellant.
    Argued January 5, 1981;
    decided February 10, 1981
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Michael F. Erdheim for appellant.
    
      Lloyd De Vos for petitioners-respondents.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs. We agree, and for the reasons stated by the Appellate Division, that there is not sufficient evidence on the record considered as a whole to support the determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board that respondent discriminated against complainant because of her national origin in violation of the Human Rights Law.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.