Case ID: f-appx_42/html/0625-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Lee BOYD, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-6439.
    United. States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted July 19, 2002.
    Decided Aug. 5, 2002.
    John Lee Boyd, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
    
      Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

John Lee Boyd seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2002), based upon Amendment 599 to the sentencing guidelines. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses that, although the court may have erroneously concluded that Amendment 599 applied to Boyd’s conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (1994), there is nevertheless no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Boyd’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.