Case ID: nys_67/html/1145-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROSENBERG et al., Respondents, v. SMOKE, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    December 26, 1900.)
    Action by Jacob Rosenberg and another against Annie Smoke. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Maurice S. Hyman, for appellant.
    Rosalsky & Rosalsky, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The only question in this case is whether the goods, to recover the price of which this action is brought, were sold to the defendant or to her husband. Upon this there was a conflict of evidence, which the trial justice has resolved in favor of the plaintiffs. We see no reason for disturbing his decision in that regard. Judgment affirmed, with costs.