Case ID: f-appx_668/html/0501-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ruben GONZALEZ-MACHUCA, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 15-2575
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: August 25, 2016
    Decided: September 12, 2016
    Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, John W. Blakeley, Assistant Director, W. Daniel Shieh, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ruben Gonzalez-Machuca, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s (IJ) order finding that he abandoned his application for cancellation of removal. After thoroughly reviewing the record and considering Gonzalez-Machuca’s arguments, we conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion by agreeing with the IJ that Gonzalez-Machu-ca abandoned his application for cancellation of removal. See Yanez-Marquez v. Lynch, 789 F.3d 434, 444 (4th Cir. 2015) (applying an abuse of discretion standard to review of BIA decisions); Moreta v. Holder, 723 F.3d 31, 34 (1st Cir. 2013) (stating standard of review).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Gonzalez-Machuca, (B.I.A. Nov. 27, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED