Case ID: f-cas_13/html/0351-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "THE COURT", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Case No. 7,212.
    JANNEY et al. v. GEIGER et al.
    [1 Cranch, C. C. 547.] 
    
    Circuit Court, District of Columbia.
    July Term, 1809.
    Mr. Youngs, for defendants,
    Mr. Swann, contra.
    
      
       [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]
    
   THE COURT

was of opinion that the first count (upon the mere indorsement of a promissory note not payable to order, without stating any consideration) was bad, but gave the plaintiffs leave to amend.

At July term, 1809, THE COURT (Duck-ett, Circuit Judge, absent) was of opinion that the second plea was bad.

Judgment for the plaintiffs.