Case ID: nys_25/html/1146-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DORNBACH et al., Respondents, v. HAHN, Appellant.
    (City Court of Brooklyn, General Term.
    October 23, 1893.)
    Action by Balthazar Dornbach and others against John Hahn.
    August P. Wagener, for appellant.
    Frank Obemier, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

The appellant has not, by. oral argument or printed points, ■called our attention to any exceptioh or ground upon which he claims that this judgment should be reversed. He has simply submitted the appeal book. Our., ■examination of the case discloses no reason for a reversal. Judgment must be -affirmed, with costs.