Case ID: ad3d_48/html/1072-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

County of Niagara, Respondent, v Town of Royalton, Appellant.
    [849 NYS2d 822]
   Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), entered May 31, 2007. The order denied defendant’s pre-answer motion to dismiss the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order denying its pre-answer motion seeking dismissal of the complaint on the grounds that plaintiff, County of Niagara (County), lacks the capacity to sue and that the action is time-barred. Contrary to defendant’s contention, the County was authorized by a resolution of the County Legislature to commence this action through the County Attorney and thus did not lack capacity to sue (cf. County of Sullivan v Town of Thompson, 99 AD2d 574, 574-575 [1984]). In addition, the six-year statute of limitations applies to this action because it is one for “money had and received [and thus] is one of quasi-contract or of contract implied-in-law” (Board of Educ. of Cold Spring Harbor Cent. School Dist. v Rettaliata, 78 NY2d 128, 138 [1991]; see CPLR 213 [2]; see also Strough v Jefferson County, 119 NY 212, 219-220 [1890]), and this action thus is not time-barred. We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are lacking in merit. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Centra, Fahey, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.