Case ID: f-appx_468/html/0218-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Blake JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 12-6104.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 1, 2012.
    Decided: March 7, 2012.
    Jeffrey Blake Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Blake Johnson appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a reduction in sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Johnson, No. 3:94-cr-00061-JPJ-5 (W.D.Va. Dec. 29, 2011; Dec. 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.