Case ID: f-appx_388/html/0999-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

TESSERA, INC., Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and Elpida Memory, Inc. and Elpida Memory (USA) Inc., Intervenors, and Smart Modular Technologies, Inc., Intervenor, and Acer, Inc., Acer America Corporation, Nanya Technology Corporation, Nanya Technology Corporation U.S.A., and Powerchip Semiconductor Corporation (now known as Powerchip Technology Corporation), Intervenors, and Ramaxel Technology, Ltd., Intervenor, and Kingston Technology Company, Inc., Intervenor.
    No. 2010-1176.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    Aug. 5, 2010.
    Before LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
   ON MOTION

ORDER

Tessera, Inc. moves for leave to file a reply brief not to exceed 12,000 words. The intervenors oppose. Tessera replies.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is ORDERED That:

The motion is granted in part; Tessera’s reply brief, not to exceed 10,000 words, is due within 14 days of the date of filing of this order.