Case ID: wend_12/html/0199-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Nelson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sickles vs. Fort.
    
      Referees may require the payment of costs as a condition to the postpone, ment of a hearing.
    The question here was, whether referees may impose the payment of costs as a condition to granting the postponement of a hearing.
    August 7.
   By the Court,

Nelson, J.

For good cause shown, the referees have power to postpone a hearing. 2 R. S. 384, § 43. The postponement being submitted to their discretion, they may impose such, terms as are usually imposed by courts upon putting off trials.