Case ID: so2d_516/html/0317-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 86-1291.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Dec. 9, 1987.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Candance M. Sunderland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of probation herein because there was sufficient evidence as to the violations of conditions ‘3’ and However, we remand to strike the reference to violation of condition '1’ because no sufficient evidence was introduced as to that alleged violation.

Affirmed and remanded.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.