Case ID: cust-ct_10/html/0407-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Cole, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Before the First Division,
    February 25, 1943
    No. 48054.
    Protests 63569-K, etc., of Asia Co. et al. (Los Angeles).
   Opinion by

Cole, J.

The issue is whether the fish were packed in oil. Several samples were admitted in evidence and the only witness produced was a Government chemist at the port of entry, who testified in behalf of the plaintiff. The record presented was very meager, but it is undisputed that the fish as imported contained vegetable oil. Following Strchmeyer v. Untied States (5 Ct. Cust. Appls. 527, T. D. 35175) the merchandise was held to be properly dutiable as assessed. United States v. Marks Co. (29 C. C. P. A. 77, C. A. D. 173) distinguished.