Case ID: cust-ct_59/html/0909-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Eichardson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Before the First Division,
    November 27, 1967
    No. P67/415.
    No. P67/416.
    No. P67/417.
    No. P67/418.
    No. P67/419.
    Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. v. United States, protests 63/8337-13425, etc. (Chicago). Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. v. United States, protests 63/12262-13573, etc. (Chicago). Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. v. United States, protests 63/15476-13679, etc. (Chicago). Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. v. United States, protests 63/17404-13801, etc. (Chicago). Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. v. United States, protests 64/1275-14098, etc. (Chicago). Dowst Manufacturing Company v. United States, protests 65/5752-14577 and 65/8656-14957 (Chicago).
    No. P67/420.
   Eichardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Gamble Vargish & Co., dba Seabury & Co. v. United States (57 Cust. Ct. 448, C.D. 2834), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.