Case ID: f-appx_547/html/0211-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Anthony McQUEEN, Petitioner.
    No. 13-2066.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.
    Decided: Nov. 25, 2013.
    Anthony McQueen, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Anthony McQueen petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion filed in his 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.2013) proceeding. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. After reviewing the district court’s docket, we confirmed that the district court ruled on McQueen’s motion on November 1, 2013. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.