Case ID: nj_60/html/0504-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cukiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN THE MATTER OF GEORGE REEVES, CHARGED WITH CONTEMPT OF COURT.
    Argued May 8, 1972
    Decided June 5, 1972.
    
      Mr. Michael 8. Bolear argued the cause for appellant.
    
      Ms. Joan W. Murphy, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the Attorney General of New Jersey, amicus curiae {Mr. Stephen Sleillman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
   The opinion of the Court was delivered

Pee Cukiam.

Defendant was convicted of contempt and sentenced to 60 days in jail. We certified his appeal before argument in the Appellate Division. We do not reach the issue which prompted certification because the conviction must be reversed for failure to comply with the rules relating to summary prosecutions for contempt. What started out as a proceeding to enforce a litigant’s right to moneys due from defendant under a support order became, without notice, a penal prosecution resulting in a fixed jail sentence. This, of course, violated the clear mandate of R. 1:10-2 to 4. See New Jersey Dep’t of Health v. Roselle, 34 N. J. 331 (1961); In re Carton, 48 N. J. 9 (1966). The rule relating to enforcement of a support order, R. 4:79-9(b), expressly refers to the basic contempt rules we have just cited.

The judgment is therefore reversed.

For reversal—Uhief Justice Weintkaub and Justices Jacobs, Ekancis, Peoctok, Hall, Schettino and Mountain—7.

Eor affirmance—Uone.