Case ID: pa_401/html/0191-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Eagen, Me. Justice Musmanno:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Pacewicz, Appellant, v. Young.
    June 30, 1960:
    Argued Marcli 15, 1960.
    Before Jones, C. J., Musmanno, Jones, Coiien, Bok and Eagen, JJ.
    
      Nicholas P. Papadakos, with him J. Paul Farrell, for appellant.
    
      J. Lawrence McBride, with him Dickie, McCamey, Chilcote cG Robinson, for appellee.
   Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

The sole legal question raised by this appeal is discussed at length and decided in the case of Neuberg v. Bobowicz, 401 Pa. 146, 162 A. 2d 662.

The order of the court below, sustaining appellee’s preliminary objections to the second count of appellant’s complaint, is accordingly affirmed.

Dissenting Opinion by

Me. Justice Musmanno:

I dissent from the decision of the Court in this case for the reasons set out at length in my Dissenting Opinion in the case of Neuberg v. Bobowicz, filed today, and reported in 401 Pa. 146, 162 A. 2d 662.