Case ID: f-appx_83/html/0595-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Audelio ARZOLA-AMAYA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-50159
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Dec. 9, 2003.
    Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant US Attorney, US Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Audelio Arzola-Amaya, pro se, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Audelio Arzola-Amaya, federal prisoner #38898-080, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion invoking the version of Fed. R.Crim. P. 35 applicable to offenses committed prior to November 1, 1987. Because Arzola-Amaya’s argument concerning his failure to be properly arraigned does not constitute a challenge to his sentence, the district court did not err in construing the Rule 35 motion as a disguised attempt to file an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Accordingly, we AFFIRM. Arzola-Amaya’s motions for the appointment of counsel and to expedite his appeal are DENIED.

AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.