Case ID: nev_92/html/0595-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DIXIE PETERSON DuBOIS, Appellant, v. JOHN BALDWIN DuBOIS, Respondent.
    No. 8469
    October 28, 1976
    555 P.2d 839
    
      Dickerson, Miles & Pico, Las Vegas, for Appellant.
    
      Albright & McGimsey, Las Vegas, for Respondent.
   OPINION

Per Curiam:

Appellant contends the district court abused its discretion in failing to grant her motion to modify a decree of divorce. We disagree.

Pursuant to the modification provision of an integrated separation and property support agreement, appellant sought an increase in alimony payments from her husband. After a hearing, the district court denied her motion. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of the district court’s discretion. Adler v. Adler, 80 Nev. 364, 394 P.2d 350 (1964); see: Porter v. Porter, 473 P.2d 538 (Mont. 1970); Moses v. Moses, 394 P.2d 601 (Colo. 1964); cf. Nace v. Nace, 489 P.2d 48 (Ariz. 1971); Gordon v. Gordon, 266 P.2d 786 (Wash. 1954).

Affirmed.