Case ID: nys_158/html/1123-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MONROE BREWING CO., respt., v. John F. BARTELS, applt.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    March 22, 1916.)
    Judgment affirmed with costs.
   All concur, except Foote and Merrell, JJ., who dissent upon the ground that the resolution electing defendant as president “for the ensuing year” and fixing Ms salary, is ambiguous as to the term of such employment, and its meaning as intended by the parties should have been submitted to the jury as a question of fact.