Case ID: sw3d_225/html/0207-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BAYER CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Miguel VALVERDE, Appellee.
    No. 08-05-00059-CV.
    Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso.
    Dec. 15, 2005.
    Katherine D. Mackillop, Houston, for Appellant.
    Charles S. Siegel, Waters & Kraus, LLP, Dallas, for Appellee.
    Before BARAJAS, C.J., McCLURE, and CHEW, JJ.
   OPINION

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice.

Pending before the Court is an agreed motion for reversal and remand for entry of judgment consistent with the parties’ settlement agreement. The parties have settled all matters in controversy. By their motion, the parties have agreed that the underlying judgment should be reversed and the cause should be remanded for entry of a take-nothing judgment. Pursuant to tex.R.AppP. 42.1(a)(2)(B), we grant the agreed motion, reverse the trial court’s judgment, and remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of a take-nothing judgment. The motion does not specify that the parties have reached an agreement regarding costs. Accordingly, costs are taxed against Appellant. See tex.R.App.P. 42.1(d).

CHEW, J., not participating.