Case ID: ad2d_217/html/0736-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "White, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Margaret Houck et al., Respondents, v Golub Corporation, Doing Business as Price Chopper Supermarkets, Appellant.
    [628 NYS2d 1021]
   White, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Hughes, J.), entered August 24,1994 in Albany County, which denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute.

This appeal arises from Supreme Court’s denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for plaintiffs’ failure to comply with a 90-day demand to file a note of issue (CPLR 3216). We affirm.

Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in accepting plaintiffs’ proffered excuse of law office failure as there is no indication in the record that plaintiffs failed to diligently pursue this lawsuit or engaged in dilatory tactics (see, Jeune v O.T. Trans Mix Corp., 202 AD2d 640; Pastore v Golub Corp., 184 AD2d 827). Moreover, the lack of demonstrable prejudice to defendant caused by plaintiffs’ delay and the fact that plaintiffs’ verified complaint and bill of particulars indicates that their cause of action may have merit are important factors militating against the dismissal of this action (see, Amy L. M. v Board of Educ., 199 AD2d 477; Lichter v State of New York, 198 AD2d 687, 688).

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.