Case ID: so2d_616/html/1051-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. POLEN, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Matthew WELLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 93-0522.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    March 31, 1993.
    Rehearing Denied May 18, 1993.
    Matthew Wells, pro se appellant.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD and HERSEY JJ., concur.

POLEN, J., concurs specially with opinion.

POLEN, Judge,

concurring specially.

I agree with the majority’s per curiam affirmance of this appeal from the trial court’s denial of appellant’s third rule 3.850 motion. I would further hold that the instant motion and this appeal from its denial is an abuse of process as an impermissible successive 3.850 motion. See Christopher v. State, 489 So.2d 22 (Fla.1986).