Case ID: so2d_216/html/0038-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Paul CASTILLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 68-231.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
    Nov. 27, 1968.
    Milton E. Grusmark and Natalie Baskin, Miami Beach, for appellant.
    Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Affirmed.

LILES, C. J., and PIERCE and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.