Case ID: ohio-st-3d_112/html/0323-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

American Financial Services Association et al., Appellants, v. City of Toledo, Appellee.
    [Cite as Am. Financial Servs. Assn. v. Toledo, 112 Ohio St.3d 323, 2006-Ohio-6569.]
    (Nos. 2005-1240 and 2005-1241
    Submitted December 13, 2006
    Decided December 20, 2006.)
    Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, L.L.P., John Winship Read, and John J. Kulewicz, for appellant American Financial Services Association.
    Jim Petro, Attorney General, Douglas R. Cole, State Solicitor, and Sharon A. Jennings and Holly J. Hunt, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellant Attorney General.
   {¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Am. Financial Servs. Assn. v. Cleveland, 112 Ohio St.3d 170, 2006-Ohio-6043, 858 N.E.2d 776, and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Am. Financial Servs. Assn. v. Cleveland, 112 Ohio St.3d 170, 2006-Ohio-6043, 858 N.E.2d 776.