Case ID: f-appx_407/html/0634-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rodriguez Samuel Da Matha DE SANTANNA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Martin O’MALLEY, Governor (first Representative of Maryland); Glenn Ivey, State’s Attorney (first Public Prosecutor of PG County); Brian Lofton, Commissioner (ID# 5138), Defendants-Appellees, and State of Maryland, In care of Governor O’Malley, Defendant.
    No. 10-1621.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 14, 2010.
    Decided: Oct. 20, 2010.
    Rodriguez Samuel Da Matha De Santanna, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn William Bell, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rodriguez Samuel Da Matha De Santanna appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss in this civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Da Matha De Santana v. O’Malley, No. 8:09-cv-01927-AW, 2010 WL 2106192 (D. Md. filed May 21, 2010 & entered May 24, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.