Case ID: md_137/html/0694-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per curiam\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

EMANUEL WANNER vs. HORNBECK & HINTON, Incorporated.
    
      Dismissal of Appeal.
    
    Tbe burden is on tbe appellant to show tbat tbe delay in transmitting tbe record to tbe Court of Appeals was due to tbe neglect or inability of tbe clerk or to tbe appellee.
    
      Decided January 13th, 1921.
    
    Appeal from tbe Superior Court of Baltimore City (Soper, C. J.).
    Tbe cause was argued before Briscoe, Thomas, Urner, Stockbridge, Adkins, and Oeeutt, JJ.
    
      Christopher R. Wattenscheidt and Lav/rie H. Riggs, for tbe .appellant.
    
      Lee I. Hecht, for tbe appellee.
   Per curiam

opinion