Case ID: ohio-st-3d_101/html/0183-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Wagner, Appellee.
    [Cite as State v. Wagner, 101 Ohio St.3d 183, 2004-Ohio-706.]
    
      (No. 2002-1808
    Submitted January 21, 2004
    Decided March 3, 2004.)
    Joseph R. Burkard, Paulding County Prosecuting Attorney, and James B. Vanzant, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
   {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Schmitt, 101 Ohio St.3d 79, 2004-Ohio-37, 801 N.E.2d 446.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents and would affirm the court of appeals.

Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Schmitt, 101 Ohio St.3d 79, 2004-Ohio-37, 801 N.E.2d 446, at ¶ 20-22.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.