Case ID: sarat-ch-sent_4/html/0027-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph Burger et al. v. Samuel I. Tobias et al.
    
    S. B. H. Judah, for complainants; R. B. Kimball, for defendants.
    Examinations of fore^^naster?'*'"
   Decided that the examinations of defendants on oath, before a master, are evidence against them, although they have refused to sign such examinations. That it is to be presumed, examinations taken down before a sworn officer of the court, in the discharge of his duty, are taken down correelly ; until the contrary is shown.

Decree of the vice chancellor as to Newstadt affirmed with sosts, The part,of the decree appealed from by defendant-Tobias also affirmed with costs,