Case ID: f-appx_333/html/0275-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregorio PENUELAS-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-50314.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 14, 2009.
    
    Filed Sept. 30, 2009.
    Before: SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Gregorio Penuelas-Sanchez appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importing cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Penuelas-Sanchez contends that the 60-month sentence imposed by the district court is unreasonable, in light of the 41-month sentence agreed to by both parties, because the 41-month sentence is sufficient but not greater than necessary to accomplish the goals of sentencing. The record reflects that the sentence imposed is reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. See United States v. Nichols, 464 F.3d 1117, 1124-26 (9th Cir.2006).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.