Case ID: f-appx_342/html/0710-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Marco Fidel CASTELLAR, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-1956-cr.
    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    Aug. 18, 2009.
    Paul S. Brenner, Esq., New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Kathleen A. Zebrowski, David S. Jones, Assistant United States Attorneys, Of Counsel, for Lev. L. Dassin, Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, NY, for Appellee.
    PRESENT: GUIDO CALABRESI, B.D. PARKER and REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judges.
   SUMMARY ORDER

Defendant-Appellant Marco Fidel Cas-tellar appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Rakoff, J.) denying his motion to quash the government’s request for financial disclosure pertaining to the restitution component of his sentence.

28 U.S.C. § 1291 provides that “[t]he courts of appeals ... shall have jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of the district courts of the United States.” Generally, a district court’s decision to compel compliance with a subpoena is not a final decision and therefore is not immediately appealable; to obtain review, the subpoenaed party “must defy the district court’s enforcement order, be held in contempt, and then appeal the contempt order, which is regarded as final under § 1291.” In re Air Crash at Belle Harbor, N.Y. on Nov. 12, 2001, 490 F.3d 99, 104 (2d Cir.2007) (internal quotation marks omitted). Castellar’s appeal is premature because he sought relief in the district court before a subpoena had even been issued, much less enforced.

For the foregoing reasons, this appeal is DISMISSED.