Case ID: so2d_447/html/0353-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dolores CECILIO, Appellant, v. Richard CECILIO, Appellee.
    No. 83-1992.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 6, 1984.
    Rehearing Denied April 10, 1984.
    Elizabeth S. Baker, Coconut Grove, for appellant.
    George L. Cardet, Miami, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Finding that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to reconsider child support obligations, we reverse that portion of the order denying modification of child support. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). In light of the parties’ disparate economic circumstances, the trial court erred in denying the wife reasonable attorneys’ fees. Locke v. Locke, 413 So.2d 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Appellant’s other points are without merit.

Reversed and remanded.