Case ID: so2d_594/html/0305-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anthony FORNEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 76900.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Feb. 27, 1992.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Jeffrey L. Anderson, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Melvina Racey Flaherty, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Forney v. State, 567 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th D.C.A.1990), which certified the same question recently answered by the Court in Barfield v. State, 594 So.2d 259 (Fla.1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We quash the opinion below and remand for reconsideration in light of Barfield.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, barkett, grimes, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.