Case ID: njl_117/html/0148-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MATTHEWS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. ANTONIO RANALLO, RESPONDENT.
    Submitted May 29, 1936
    Decided October 2, 1936.
    For the appellant, Edwin Joseph O’Brien.
    
    For the respondent, Vincent A. deBennedetto.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.