Case ID: sw2d_809/html/0479-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Virgil R. UPLINGER, Defendant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent.
    No. 58858.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    May 28, 1991.
    J. Bryan Allee, Columbia, for defendant-appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert P. Sass, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Virgil R. Uplinger, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record and find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).