Case ID: so2d_593/html/1237-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Roberto Jose VASQUEZ, etc., et al., Appellants, v. MOTOPORT, U.S.A., INC., etc., et al., Appellees.
    Nos. 90-1718, 90-2317 and 91-376.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 10, 1992.
    Kaplan & Miller, James C. Blecke, Perse & Ginsberg and Arnold Ginsberg, Brumer, Cohen, Logan, Kandell & Kaufman, Miami, for appellants.
    Blackwell & Walker, and James E. Trib-ble and Angela C. Flowers, Miami, Conrad, Scherer & James, and Linda R. Spaulding, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Sakon v. PepsiCo, Inc., 553 So.2d 163 (Fla.1989). Trespalacios v. Valor Corp., 486 So.2d 649 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Dade County Police Benev. Ass’n, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 452 So.2d 6 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); review denied, 461 So.2d 114 (Fla.1985). Winfield v. Noe, 426 So.2d 1148 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Cassisi v. Maytag, 396 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).