Case ID: f-cas_19/html/1205-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Case Wo. 11,349.
    POTTS v. The WILLIAM A. BURDEN.
    [N. Y. Times, April 16, 1864.]
    District Court, S. D. New York.
    1864.
    Collision — Pleading—Twenty-Third Rule.
    [A libel for collision must state the courses of the vessels, their speed, and specific acts of negligence by the respondents.]
    [This was a libel for collision by Frederick A. Potts against the steamboat William A. Burden. Heard on exceptions to the libel.
    Mr. Fithian, for libelant.
    Benedict, Burr & Benedict, for claimant
    Before BETTS, District Judge.
    This case came up on exceptions to the libel. The case was brought for damages caused by a collision. The claimant excepted to the libel, as not conforming to the requirements of the twenty-third rule of the supreme court by setting out allegations of the facts of the collision; that it did not state the courses of the vessels, or their speed, or in what respects the Burden was carelessly managed, or what she ought to have done that she did not do.
   HELD

BY THE COURT:

That no liberality of intendment or indulgence will be permitted to rescue a party from the consequences of diregarding an express direction in law as to the mode of procedure in a suit. That the statements in the libel are in reality no more than suggestions or even inferences that the damages complained of were caused by the negligence or improper conduct of the steamboat. That this is not a fulfillment of the rule of the supreme court, and consequently is inadequate to lay a legal foundation for the action brought. That the exceptions therefore must prevail, but they are so technical and strict that it will be without costs, and with leave to the li-belant to amend within ten days.