Case ID: f-appx_667/html/0066-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lemoyne VENEY, a/k/a Victor Demaris, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-6468
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 23, 2016
    Decided: June 29, 2016
    Lemoyne Veney, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Tamera Lynn Fine, Assistant United States Attorney, Paul Nitze, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding ' precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lemoyne Veney seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying several motions Veney filed in his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) proceeding. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Veney seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED