Case ID: f-appx_280/html/0899-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Theodis JONES, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-15694
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    June 5, 2008.
    Anne R. Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Philip Louis Reizenstein, Philip L. Reizenstein PA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and HULL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Philip L. Reizenstein, appointed counsel for Theodis Jones, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of Jones’s motion to reduce his sentence is AFFIRMED.