Case ID: so3d_122/html/0996-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. MAKAR, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dan SOWELL, Bay County Property Appraiser, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE In re the Matter of Certain Decisions of the 2012 Bay County Value Adjustment Board, Appellee.
    No. 1D13-2799.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Oct. 11, 2013.
    Loren E. Levy and Ana C. Torres, of The Levy Law Firm, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Nancy Terrel, General Counsel, Department of Revenue, Tallahassee, for Appel-lee.
   PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

ROBERTS and SWANSON, JJ., concur; MAKAR, J., concurs with written opinion.

MAKAR, J.,

concurs with written opinion.

The filing of a petition for mandamus, though entailing a separate filing and related expense, is available to the property appraiser to contest the Department’s position that its probable cause review is an agency investigation and not a final agency action subject to judicial review. Students for Online Voting v. Machen, 24 So.3d 1273, 1274 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (granting mandamus due to university’s “failure to perform its statutory duty to render the order.”). Whatever economic efficiency that might be gained in this case by resolving this issue now is outweighed by muddying the relatively clear doctrinal line that mandamus is the proper vehicle to advance the property appraiser’s legal position, if it chooses to do so.