Case ID: so2d_644/html/0087-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert LUISI, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 82067.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Oct. 27, 1994.
    Alan H. Schreiber, Public Defender, and Stacey J. Pastel, Asst. Public Defender, Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Richard L. Rosen-baum of Law Offices of Richard L. Rosen-baum, Fort Lauderdale, and Rhonda Rogers of Law Offices of Rhonda Rogers, Hollywood, for petitioners.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Joan Fowler, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review State v. Luisi, 619 So.2d 308 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), which certified the same questions of great public importance we answered in Carino v. State, 635 So.2d 9 (Fla.1994). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Based on the answers provided in Carino, the decision below is approved.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.