Case ID: so2d_293/html/0192-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "TATE, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHRYSLER CREDIT CORP. v. Paul M. BERTRAND v. CHRYSLER MOTORS CORP. and Lafayette Motor Co., Inc.
    No. 54660.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 30, 1974.
   In re: Paul M. Bertrand applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Iberia. 290 So.2d 3S0.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law.

TATE, J.,

dissents from denial. Although the issue is characterized as factual (and therefore not ordinarily regarded as ground for certiorari), the majority and dissenting opinions of the court of appeal, and the trial judge’s opinion (entitled to great weight in absence of manifest error) show that the third-party plaintiff is entitled to rescission because of redhibitory defect.