Case ID: f-appx_11/html/0880-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joyce WANG, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant, Samuel CHEUNG, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 00-15067.
    D.C. No. CV-98-01690-MHP.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 14, 2001 .
    Decided April 9, 2001.
    Before SNEED, FERNANDEZ, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

After de novo review, we affirm the judgment of the district court. There is no evidence in the record based on which a reasonable jury could conclude that the reasons offered by Samuel Cheung for terminating Joyce Wang’s employment were pretextual. The evidence is uncontradicted that Cheung terminated Wang on the basis of her inability to work appropriately with her colleagues.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     
      
      . See Weiner v. San Diego County, 210 F.3d 1025, 1028 (9th Cir.2000).
     
      
      . See Nelson v. Pima Community College, 83 F.3d 1075, 1081 (9th Cir.1996); Wallis v. J.R. Simplot Co., 26 F.3d 885, 890 (9th Cir. 1994).