Case ID: nj-eq_91/html/0153-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Clement E. Eckrode, appellant, v. Endurance Tire and Rubber Corporation of New York, respondent.
    [Decided November 17th, 1919.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Foster, whose opinion is reported in 90 N. J. Eq. 129.
    
    
      Mr. August C. Streittvolf, for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. GoEins •& Corbin, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Foster.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Wi-iite, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Ackerson — 10.

For reversal — Swayze, KalisciI — 2.