Case ID: so3d_96/html/1097-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Pedro CIFUENTES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D11-3972.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Sept. 5, 2012.
    Pedro Cifuentes, West Park, Pro Se.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of appellant’s motion for postconviction relief, which challenged his 1996 no contest plea to charges of resisting with violence and battery. His claims are procedurally barred as untimely. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b). We reject his claim that Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), is retroactive. Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), rev. granted, 81 So.3d 414 (Fla.2012); Davis v. State, 69 So.3d 315 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Further, even if Padilla is found to be retroactive, appellant does not allege that the court failed to give the standard deportation warning of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172(c)(8), and his claim is insufficient to merit relief. See Flores v. State, 57 So.3d 218 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), petition for review pending, No. SC11-989.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.