Case ID: f-appx_627/html/0907-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

KAKAWI YACHTING, INC., Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellant, v. MARLOW MARINE SALES, INC., Marlow Marine Service, Inc., Marlow-Merrill-Stevens, LLC, David Marlow, Michael Cannova, Marlow Yachts, Ltd, Marlow Yachts Ltd, Inc., Defendants-Counter Claimants-Appellees.
    No. 14-15526.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Dec. 21, 2015.
    Michael T. Moore, Scott Andrew Wagner, Moore & Company, PA, Coral Gables, FL, John J. Del Rossi, Del Rossi Law Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellant.
    Aubrey Omar Dicus, Jr., Caitlin Colleen Docherty, Howard P. Ross, Battaglia Ross Dicus & McQuaid, PA, St Petersburg, FL, for Defendants-Counter Claimants-Appellees.
    Before WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       Honorable Ronald L. Gilman, United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM:

Kakawi Yachting, Inc. (Kakawi) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants Marlow Marine Sales, Inc., Marlow Marine Services, Inc., Marlow-Merrill-Stevens, LLC, David Marlow, Michael Canriova, Marlow Yachts, Ltd., and'Marlow Yachts Ltd., Inc. (collectively, Marlow) on all claims. Kakawi alleges that the luxury yacht it purchased from Marlow was defective because it did not meet the unrestricted navigation standards required under the purchase contract.

After a review of the district court’s complete and detailed order, the parties’ briefs, and having had the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error. Given our highly deferential standard of review, we are unable to find an abuse of discretion by the district court in excluding Colin Pegrum’s expert testimony and repairs estimate (Estimate) when notice was insufficient to meet disclosure obligations under Rule 26(a)(2). See Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2). Secondly, we find no error in the entry of summary judgment because Kakawi is unable to prove damages without Pegrum’s testimony and Estimate. After a searching review of the briefs, complaint, and record, we are unable to find a request by Kakawi to the court for the remedy of specific performance. Therefore, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.