Case ID: nys_129/html/1133-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

McCREERY, Appellant, v. HARRAL SOAP CO., Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    April 28, 1911.)
    Action by William A. MeCreery against the Harral Soap Company.
   PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff’s right to recover on the facts is clearly limited to the sum of $7.23. That fact was conceded, but overlooked on the first argument. As no power exists to correct the judgment in that regard, the judgment (141 App. Div. 922, 125 N. Y. Supp. 1129) is reversed on reargument, without costs, and a new trial ordered. See, also, 127 N. Y. Supp. 1130.