Case ID: so2d_182/html/0025-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. TILLMAN PEARSON, Judge", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ARBAN, DUBLIN, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. MIAMI NATIONAL BANK, a national banking corporation, Appellee.
    No. 65-540.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    Jan. 11, 1966.
    Rehearing Denied Fob. 8, 1966.
    Hansford D. Tyler, Jr., Miami, for appellant.
    Harrison & Kornbluh, Miami, for ap-pellee.
    Before TILLMAN PEARSON, BARK-DULL and SWANN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal questions the propriety of an interlocutory order dissolving a temporary injunction and involves a similar factual situation to that in Horvath v. Five Points National Bank, Fla.App., 182 So.2d 22, opinion filed this date. And, for the reasons therein stated, the order here under review is affirmed and this matter is returned to the chancellor with directions to dismiss the complaint.

Affirmed with directions.

TILLMAN PEARSON, Judge

(concurring specially).

My concurrence is upon the grounds stated in the concurring opinion in Horvath v. Five Points National Bank, Fla.App., 182 So.2d 22, opinion filed this date.