Case ID: ny-super-ct_47/html/0549-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ADALINE T. SMITH, Respondent, v. EZRA H. LINLEY, et al., Appellants.
    Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., Speir and Freedman, JJ.
    
      Decided June 13, 1881.
    Appeal from order granting plaintiff’s motion to amend complaint.
    Arnoux, Hitch & Woodford, for appellants.
    
      Charles 8. Jackson, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The court is of opinion that the order was within the discretion of the judge below, and that no reason appear for disturbing his exercise of that discretion.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs, and disbursements to be taxed.