Case ID: njl_124/html/0565-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NINA L. MURPHY ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. BOROUGH OF POINT PLEASANT BEACH, APPELLANT.
    Argued February 7, 1940 —
    Decided April 25, 1940.
    For the respondents, Ewart & Bennett.
    
    For the appellant, Charles B. Ferguson.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — -Case, Bobine, Peeskie, Heteield, Deas, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeeety, Hague, JJ. 9.

For reversal — Heheb, J. 1.