Case ID: so2d_675/html/1044-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Enrique CASTILLO, Appellant, v. Vitor WEINMAN, Appellee.
    No. 95-3232.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 3, 1996.
    A.J. Barranco & Associates, Sam Daniels and Robert F. Kohlman, Miami, for appellant.
    Stickney & Sutter, Timothy P. Stickney and Howard T. Sutter, Key Biscayne; Stearns, Weaver, Miller, Weissler, Alhadeff & Sitterson, Eugene E. Stearns and Bradford Swing, Miami, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and FLETCHER, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order under review, but remand for clarification. Specifically, the trial court’s order should clearly indicate that the seller is required to pursue the action to quiet title in good faith. The order should also indicate that if the seller does not prevail in the action to quiet title, the buyer then has the option of either receiving a return of his deposit or accepting title to the property subject to the easement.

Affirmed and remanded with directions.