Case ID: so2d_776/html/1091-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. RAMIREZ, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

C.A.M., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D00-1453.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Feb. 7, 2001.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Maria E. Lauredo, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Michael Neimand and Darien M. Doe, Assistant Attorneys General, and Ana Cristina Lloyd, Certified Legal Intern, for appellee.
    
      Before LEVY, FLETCHER, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVY and FLETCHER, JJ., concur.

RAMIREZ, J.,

dissenting.

I dissent because the state offered no evidence in its case-in-chief that on the day the defendant was arrested for trespassing he was not “authorized, licensed, or invited” to be on the premises. See § 810.09(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999); Seago v. State, 768 So.2d 498 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).