Case ID: so2d_425/html/0646-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SUN BANK OF RIVERSIDE, a Florida banking corporation, Appellant, v. Gerald TAINES, Harold Z. Taines, and Sue Taines, Appellees.
    Nos. 82-640, 82-1079.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Jan. 25, 1983.
    Maro & Soto and Jack Maro, Miami, for appellant.
    Smith & Mandler and Patricia M. Silver, Miami Beach, for appellees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUB-BART and NESBITT, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The summary final judgments in favor of the defendants are reversed since there were material issues of fact remaining as to whether the renewal of the guaranty obligation sued upon was executed contemporaneously with the further extension of credit to the primary obligor. Jones v. McConnon & Co., 100 Fla. 1158, 130 So. 760 (1930); Gordon v. Corporate Insurance Services, Inc., 374 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Cf. Brandon v. Pittman, 117 Fla. 678, 158 So. 443 (1934); Gibbs v. American National Bank of Jacksonville, 155 So.2d 651 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963), cert. discharged, 170 So.2d 821 (Fla.1964).

Reversed and remanded.