Case ID: sw2d_857/html/0473-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lawrence PAYNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 62073.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    June 15, 1993.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 14, 1993.
    Application to Transfer Denied Aug. 17, 1993.
    David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Saleeby, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

We find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Defendant’s Rule 27.26 (repealed) motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 27.26(j). We further find an opinion would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued for the parties’ use only.