Case ID: so2d_816/html/0208-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John F. SALLANO, Appellant, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Appellee.
    No. 3D01-1675.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 8, 2002.
    John F. Sallano, in proper person.
    Robert A. Ginsburg, Miami-Dade County Attorney, Thomas A. Tucker Ronzetti and Warren F.X. Smith, Assistant County Attorneys, for appellee.
    Before JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 57.085(2), Fla. Stat. (2000); Urrutia v. Harrisburg County Police Dep’t, 91 F.3d 451, 458 n. 13 (3d Cir.1996) (under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, merely “submitting an in forma pauperis complaint to the clerk does not result in commencement of the litigation and satisfaction of the statute of limitations.”); Reed v. Mims, 711 So.2d 169, 171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (“It is evident that [§ 57.085] is patterned after similarly worded 28 U.S.C. § 1915.”)