Case ID: ny_199/html/0545-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Philip O'Connor, Respondent, v. Forty-second Street, Manhattanville and St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
    
      O'Connor v. Forty-second St., M. & St. N. Ave. Ry. Co., 131 App. Div. 901, affirmed.
    (Argued June 14, 1910;
    decided September 27, 1910.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 23, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence.
    
      Bayard II. Ames, John Montgomery and James L. Quackenbush for appellant.
    
      Joseph Fischer and Lords J. Eorhaus for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, -with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.