Case ID: ne3d_100/html/0445-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "O'Donnell, J., dissents.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

State v. Jones
    2018-0601
    Supreme Court of Ohio.
    June 27, 2018
    CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS
    MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS
   On review of an order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are ordered to brief the issue stated at page 1 of the court of appeals' entry filed April 3, 2018: "Must a dog have been previously designated as a 'dangerous dog' under Chapter 955 of the Ohio Revised Code before its owner may be prosecuted for a violation of R.C. 955.22 ?"

The conflict case is State v. Crocker, 5th Dist. Coshocton No. 2012 CA 0021,2013-Ohio-3100.

O'Donnell, J., dissents.

Fischer, J., not participating.