Case ID: or-app_76/html/0390-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted October 22,
    judgments vacated and remanded for entry of judgment of conviction for burglary in second degree; otherwise affirmed November 14, 1985
    STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RANDALL SHANE ROGERS, Appellant.
    
    (10-84-07913, 10-84-07914, 10-84-09595, 10-84-09596, 10-84-09597, 10-84-09676; CA A35637 (Control), A35638, A35639, A35640, A35641, A35642)
    (Cases Consolidated)
    708 P2d 650
    Stephen J. Williams, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.
    Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.
    Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Newman, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of six counts of burglary in the first degree. He appeals the convictions on four of the counts which were based on his being armed with burglar’s tools. He contends that his convictions in those cases must be modified to convictions of burglary in the second degree, because the tools in question were not established to be burglar’s tools. ORS 164.235(2). The state concedes that defendant is correct. We agree. State v. Graves, 299 Or 189, 700 P2d 244 (1985); State v. Sells, 299 Or 198, 702 P2d 68 (1985).

In cases 10-84-07913, 10-84-07914, 10-84-09595 and 10-84-09676 the judgments are vacated and remanded for entry of judgment of conviction for burglary in the second degree in each case and for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.