Case ID: so2d_542/html/1070-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Interest of J.J., a child.
    No. 88-1095.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 17, 1989.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Marcy K. Allen, Asst. Public Defender, and Sim Gershon, Legal Intern, West Palm Beach, for appellant — J.J., a child.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joy B. Shearer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee— State of Fla.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon a review of the evidence in the record, we affirm the appellant’s adjudication of delinquency for grand theft. We note that the error in admitting the irrelevant contents of an unidentified telephone call was harmless. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). However, the state concedes that appellant’s additional adjudication for petty theft should be reversed. See Hearn v. State, 55 So.2d 559 (Fla.1951). The order of delinquency is therefore reversed and remanded for modification.

HERSEY, C.J., and STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.