Case ID: nj_69/html/0031-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. QUINCY H. LUCARELLO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued November 3, 1975
    Decided December 3, 1975.
    
      Mr. Thomas P. Ford, Jr., argued the cause pro se.
    
    
      Mr. R. Benjamin Cohen, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Anthony J. Fusco, Mr. Harry Robinson, III and Mr. Stephen Rosenfeld, Assistant Prosecutors, of counsel; Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Essex County Prosecutor, attorney).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in its majority opinion reported at 135 N. J. Super. 347 (1975).

For affirmance—Chief Justice Hughes, Justices Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman, Clifford and Schbeiber and Judge Conford—7.

For reversal—None.