Case ID: sw3d_273/html/0048-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stanley L. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Daniel PINGELTON, Respondent.
    No. WD 69408.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Oct. 21, 2008.
    Stanley L. Williams, Cameron, MO, prose.
    Daniel Pingelton, Columbia, MO, pro-se.
    Before HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, P.J., PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge and VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stanley Williams appeals the order of the trial court denying his motion to set aside a default judgment entered against him in his legal malpractice action. On appeal, Williams claims that the trial court erred in denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum and in denying his motion to set aside the default judgment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The • judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).