Case ID: ny_307/html/0932-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edwin F. Borgos et al., Respondents, v. Edward G. Duerstein et al., Appellants.
    Submitted November 29, 2954;
    decided December 3, 1954.
    
      
      Harry G. Herman, County Attorney, for motion.
    
      Julius Garrell and Harry Menoin opposed.
   Motion for leave to appeal dismissed, with $10 costs and necessary printing disbursements, upon the ground that the movant is neither a “ party aggrieved ” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 557, subd. 1) nor a “ person aggrieved who is not a party but is entitled to be substituted in place of a party ” within the meaning of section 557 (subd. 2) of the Civil Practice Act. Motion for an order of substitution dismissed.