Case ID: f-appx_713/html/0518-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frederick L. PITCHFORD Plaintiff-Appellant v. Joseph BOECKMANN; Fred Thorne; David Henry Lofton; Jerry Eaves Defendants-Appellees
    No. 17-2504
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: February 14, 2018
    Filed: February 28, 2018
    Frederick L. Pitchford, Pro Se
    Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Frederick L. Pitchford appeals the district court’s dismissal, without prejudice, of his pro se complaint. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

Upon de novo review of Pitchford’s appellate arguments and the district court record, this court finds no basis for reversal. See Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (pre-service dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) is reviewed de novo).

The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable D. P. Marshall, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.