Case ID: so2d_112/html/0888-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John G. BANKS and Ann H. Banks, Appellants, v. CITY OF TAMPA, Appellee.
    No. 241.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
    May 20, 1959.
    Rehearing Denied June 19, 1959.
    T. Truett Ott, of Hardee & Ott, Tampa, for appellants.
    Ralph A. Marsicano, Neil C. McMullen, and William R. McCown, Tampa, for ap-pellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The record reveals the existence of a genuine issue as to a material fact, namely, whether or not appellant wife saw or should have seen the alleged defect in the sidewalk of the City of Tampa. Accordingly, the summary judgment entered below against the plaintiffs-appellants should be reversed. Rule 1.36(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 30 F.S.A.; Mullis v. City of Miami, Fla.1952, 60 So.2d 174; Smith v. Poston Bridge & Iron, Inc., Fla.1956, 87 So.2d 581; Delany v. Breeding’s Homestead Drug Co., Fla.1957, 93 So.2d 116; Farrey v. Bettendorf, Fla.1957, 96 So.2d 889; Bess v. 17545 Collins Avenue, Inc., Fla.1957, 98 So.2d 490; Buck v. Hardy, Fla.App. 1958, 106 So.2d 428; Mason v. Renick, Fla.App.1958, 107 So.2d 38.

Reversed.

KANNER, C. J., ALLEN, J., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Associate Judge, concur.