Case ID: f-appx_232/html/0072-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Richard COPELAND, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-0225-cr.
    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    Aug. 20, 2007.
    
      Scott Dunn, Assistant United States Attorney, (F. Franklin Amanat, Emily Berger, Assistant United States Attorneys, on the brief), for Roslynn R. Mauskopf, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, N.Y., for Appellee.
    David A. Lewis, Federal Defenders of New York, Inc., New York, N.Y., for Defendant-Appellant.
    PRESENT: Hon. GUIDO CALABRESI, Hon. REENA RAGGI and Hon. PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges.
   SUMMARY ORDER

Defendant-Appellant Richard Copeland appeals from a judgment of the district court denying his motion to dismiss his indictment for illegal reentry. United States v. Copeland, 369 F.Supp.2d 275 (E.D.N.Y.2005).

In reviewing the record before us, in light of the factors and balancing test outlined in Matter of Marin, 16 I. & N. Dec. 581 (BIA 1978), we agree with the district court in its conclusion that there is not a reasonable probability that had Copeland been informed of, and sought, a Section 212(c) hearing, he would have been granted relief from deportation.

The judgment of the district court is therefore AFFIRMED.