Case ID: ny-st-rep_70/html/0888-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bryan McAveney, App’lt, v. Thomas H. Brush et al., Resp’ts.
    N. Y. C. P.,
    December 2, 1895.
    Motion for reargument of appeal.
   Per Curiam.

As the adjudication that the defendant was in contempt was-made at the general term upon appeal from an order holding otherwise for legal reasons, and the fine was imposed at the general term, we will allow a reargument upon the facts. Motion granted, without costs.