Case ID: nw2d_920/html/0454-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the INTEREST OF D.V.A.
    Julie Lawyer, Assistant State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee v. D.V.A., Respondent and Appellant
    No. 20180166
    Supreme Court of North Dakota.
    Filed December 6, 2018
    Ryan A. Keefe (on brief), Assistant State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for petitioner and appellee.
    Kent M. Morrow (on brief), Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellant.
   Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] D.V.A. appeals from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from treatment and finding he remains a sexually dangerous individual. D.V.A. argues the district court erred in denying his application for discharge because the order is not supported by sufficient evidence that he would likely engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct placing others in danger under N.D.C.C. § 25-03.3-01(9). The district court's findings of fact and order are supported by clear and convincing evidence, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jon J. Jensen

Jerod E. Tufte