Case ID: sw3d_377/html/0610-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Patrick D. MOORE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 97925.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Sept. 4, 2012.
    Roxanna A. Mason, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    
      Chris Koster, Attorney General, Richard A. Starnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Patrick Moore, Jr. appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court did not err in denying Moore’s claim for ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).