Case ID: ga-app_32/html/0779-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Luke, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

15682.
    Bearden v. The State.
    Decided October 7, 1924.
    Indictment for larceny of cotton; from 'Whitfield superior court • — Judge Tarver. May 17, 1924.
    
      George G. Glenn, John G. Mitchell, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Joseph M. Lang, solicitor-general, contra.
   Luke, J.

The conviction not being wholly dependent upon circumstantial evidence, an assignment of error upon the ground that, without request, the court failed to charge the law of circumstantial evidence is without merit.

The evidence amply authorized the conviction, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. Eor none of the reasons assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworlh, J., concur.