Case ID: cust-ct_62/html/1080-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Ford, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. P69/103.
    protest 63/14388(B) (San Francisco).
    No. P69/104.
    protest 66/59333 (New York).
    No. P69/105.
    protest 68/15569 (New York).
    Import Associates of America, Inc. v. United States, Dan Brechner Co. v. United States, Dan Brechner & Co., Inc. v. United States,
   Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of batteries, classified as entireties with flashlights, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Torch Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States (57 Cust. Ct. 521, C.D. 2863), wherein said batteries were held to be separately dutiable and that no separate value for each of said items had been returned by the appraiser, the protests were dismissed and the matter remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement to determine the separate value of the flashlights and batteries in the mamier provided by law (28 U.S.C., section 2636 (d)).