Case ID: f-appx_478/html/0036-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rudolph Valentino MURRAY, a/k/a Trini, a/k/a Rudy, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 12-7160.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 11, 2012.
    Decided: Sept. 14, 2012.
    
      Rudolph Valentino Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rudolph Valentino Murray appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error, given that Murray is ineligible for the reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v. Murray, No. 2:97-cr-00025-AWA-1 (E.D.Va. May 31, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.