Case ID: ohio-st-2d_57/html/0069-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State, ex rel. Nakhle, v. Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County et al.
    [Cite as State, ex rel. Nakhle, v. Court of Common Pleas (1979), 57 Ohio St. 2d 69.]
    (No. 78-790
    Decided March 14, 1979.)
    
      
      Reminger & Reminger Co., L. P. A., Mr. Richard T. Reminger, Mr. James L. Malone, Messrs. Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur and Mr. Thomas A. Young, for relator.
    
      Mr. George J. McMonagle, for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

“Due to the extraordinary nature of the relief requested, the existence of an adequate legal remedy by the regular appellate process, and the fact that it has not been shown, at this point, that the respondent judge has no jurisdiction of the subject matter of the cause which relator seeks to prohibit,” State, ex rel. Dayton Power & Light Co., v. Riley (1978), 53 Ohio St. 2d 168, the writ of prohibition is denied.

Writ denied.

Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

Herbert, J., concurs in the judgment.

Holmes, J., not participating.