Case ID: sw3d_73/html/0769-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marilyn BONO, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Morin HANSON, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 79104.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Feb. 26, 2002.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 8, 2002.
    Application for Transfer Denied May 28, 2002.
    Moser and Marsalek, P.C., Robyn G. Fox, Catherine M. Vale, Behr, Mantovani, McCarter & Potter, P.C., Anthony R. Behr, St. Louis, MO, Green, Schaaf & Jacobson, Martin Green, Fernando Ber-mudez, Clayton, MO, for appellant.
    Padberg Law Firm, Matthew J. Pad-berg, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J., and MARY R. RUSSELL, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
   Morin Hanson (Doctor) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Marilyn Bono (Patient) on her action to recover damages based on Doctor’s negligence while performing a surgical excision of a mass in Patient’s neck. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).