Case ID: f-appx_47/html/0678-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paris Tiwand PULLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-4262.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 27, 2002.
    Decided Oct. 10, 2002.
    Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, G. Alan DuBois, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Paris Tiwand Pulley appeals from the sixty-month sentence he received for the revocation of his supervised release. On appeal, he alleges that the sentence was unreasonable and that he should have been sentenced within the guideline range of thirty to thirty-seven months as calculated under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“USSG”) § 7B1.4(a) (2001). We affirm Pulley’s sentence as the guideline range in USSG § 7B1.4(a) is advisory only, United States v. Davis, 53 F.3d 638, 640-41 (4th Cir.1995), and the sentence imposed was not unreasonable. We dispense with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.