Case ID: md_182/html/0570-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PAUL E. RITTER ET ux. v. COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BALTIMORE COUNTY ET AL. CARL STOUTENBERG v. SAME
    [Nos. 12 and 31,
    January Term, 1944.]
    
      Decided January 12, 1944.
    
    The causes were argued before Sloan, C. J., Delaplaine, Collins, Marbury, Melvin, and Bailey, JJ.
    
      Edward L. Ward and Wilfred T. McQuaid for the appellants.
    
      Michael Paul Smith and William C„ Walsh, Attorney General, and D. Heyward Hamilton, Jr., for the appellees.
   The following opinion was filed Per Curiam:

The same question presented in both of the above entitled cases having been submitted, argued and decided in County Commissioners of Anne Arundel County v. English, 182 Md. 514, 35 A. 2d 135, in which the appellee in these cases, with the permission of this court, filed a brief, one of its counsel having argued the appeal on behalf of Anne Arundel County, and these appeals having been submitted by counsel for all parties for such action as this court may consider proper, the decrees appealed from will be reversed.

Decrees inNos. 12 and 31 reversed, with costs.