Case ID: f2d_241/html/0416-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Boyd R. RINGHISER, Appellant, v. The CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellee.
    No. 12898.
    United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
    Dec. 19, 1956.
    Alex S. Dombey, Willi C. Richard Grieser, Col appellant. iam A. Richards, umbus, Ohio, for
    Wilson & Rector, Col appellee. umbus, Ohio, for
    Before MARTIN, M' MILLER, Circuit Judgbi pALLISTER and s.
   PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel for appellant, the court havi mission to counsel for mit its case on the brief being duly advised, ing granted per-appellee to sub-f; and the court

Now, therefore, it is o rdered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and i£ hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Cecil, sustaining appellee’s motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict. 148 F.Supp. 529.