Case ID: ohio-st-3d_41/html/0713-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Wednesday, February 8, 1989
    MERIT DOCKET
    89-182.
    State, ex rel. Lytle, v. Hottle.
   In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED by the court that said writ be, and the same is hereby, denied, effective February 7, 1989.

Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Douglas, Wright and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Sweeney and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.