Case ID: sw2d_977/html/0562-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

W.R. ASHCRAFT, Petitioner, v. Donald E. LOOKADOO, Respondent.
    No. 97-0920.
    Supreme Court of Texas.
    April 2, 1998.
    Gary M. Pridavka, Dallas, for Petitioner.
    Gregory A. Whittmore, Dallas, for Respondent.
   OPINION

PER CURIAM.

In denying this petition for review, the Court neither approves nor disapproves of the court of appeals’ discussion of whether the assignment of a promissory note also operated as an assignment of a guaranty of that note. See 952 S.W.2d 907, 911-13. The petition for review is denied.