Case ID: f2d_411/html/0990-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Walter Lee ERVIN, Appellant, v. Hoyt C. CUPP, Warden, Appellee.
    No. 22917.
    United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
    May 2, 1969.
    Evelyn N. Scott (argued), Salem, Or., for appellant.
    David H. Blunt (argued), Assfe Atty. Gen., Robert Y. Thornton, Atty. Gen., Salem, Or., for appellee.
    Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and BEEKS, District Judge.
   ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

PER CURIAM:

The appeal is dismissed.

This case began with a state conviction. It was affirmed on appeal. State v. Ervin, 241 Or. 475, 406 P.2d 901 (1965).

Next Ervin files in federal district court asserting many points never submitted at any time.

Oregon has post-conviction remedies, but no attempt has been made to use them.

Duty requires us to interfere with state process from time to time, but in this ease obviously not yet.