Case ID: ga-app_114/html/0331-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Jordan, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

42252.
    STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. SEWELL, by Next Friend.
   Jordan, Judge.

Under the decision of this court in Georgia Life &c. Ins. Co. v. Sewell, 113 Ga. App. 443 (1) (148 SE2d 447), which involved the same plaintiff and the same accident and a similar policy provision, the excerpt from the charge complained of was not erroneous for any reasons enumerated, and since the evidence, differing only slightly from that in the above stated case, did not demand a verdict for the defendant the trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for directed verdict and the subsequent motion for a new trial.

Submitted September 6, 1966

Decided September 16, 1966

Rehearing denied September 23, 1966

Heard & Leverett, E. Freeman Leverett, for appellant.

McClure, Ramsay & Struble, Robert B. Struble, Joseph S. Skelton, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.