Case ID: so2d_458/html/0432-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James LOVE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 83-2563.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Nov. 14, 1984.
    Bruce David Green of Levine & Green, P.A., and Mark S. Solomon, Fort Lauder-dale, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Sarah B. Mayer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We are of the view that there was enough direct testimony, coupled with hearsay testimony, to support the trial judge’s decision to revoke the defendant’s probation. Wheeler v. State, 344 So.2d 630 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1977); Rathburn v. State, 353 So.2d 902 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

As a consequence, we do not find it necessary to address the provisions of Section 827.07(8), Florida Statutes (1983).

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and LETTS and HURLEY, JJ., concur.