Case ID: f-appx_693/html/0701-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alvar Gante TOLEDO, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-16185
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 11, 2017 
    
    Filed July 17, 2017
    Mark Alexander Inciong, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, DOJ—Office of the US Attorney, Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee
    Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Alvar Gante Toledo appeals from the district court’s order granting in part his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court reduced Toledo’s sentence to 108 months, the bottom of the amended guideline range. .This was the lowest sentence the court could impose. See U.S.S.G. § lB1.10(b)(2)(A). Toledo’s claim that he was eligible for a further reduction fails because he does not meet the requirements of U.S.S.G. § lB1.10(b)(2)(B). See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 cmt. n.3; United States v. Finazzo, 841 F.3d 816, 818-19 (9th Cir. 2016).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.