Case ID: cust-ct_39/html/0488-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Wilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 61334.
    protests 278635-K, etc. (New York).
    Adolph Goldmark & Son Corp. et al. v. United States,
   Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sprats in oil similar in all material respects to those the subject of Arnold Sorensin Co., Inc., et al. v. United States (38 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 1862), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.