Case ID: sw2d_968/html/0270-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LEMAY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, Plaintiff/Appellant. v. CMR CONSTRUCTION, INC., Defendant/Respondent.
    No. 73479.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    June 9, 1998.
    
      W. Dudley McCarter, Christopher L. Kan-zler, St. Louis, for plaintiffyappellant.
    Brian E. McGovern, Michael E. Kaemmerer, Kevin T. McLaughlin, Chesterfield, for defendant/respondent.
    Before CRAHAN, C.J., CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in defendant’s favor on plaintiffs recission action. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).