Case ID: f-appx_55/html/0197-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re MICROSOFT CORPORATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION. SUN MICROSYSTEMS, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Microsoft Corporation, a Washington corporation, Defendant-Appellant. Wildtangent, Incorporated, Amicus Supporting Appellant.
    No. 03-1116.
    Nos. CA-02-2739-JFM, CA-00-1332-MDL.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Feb. 3, 2003.
    John Bucher Isbister, Tydings & Rosenberg, James Patrick Ulwick, Kramon & Graham, Baltimore, MD, Lloyd R. Day, Jr., James Richard Batchelder, Robert M. Galvin, Day, Casebeer, Batchelder & Madrid LLP, Cupertino, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Michael Francis Brockmeyer, Piper Rudnick, LLP, Baltimore, MD, David Bruce Tulchin, Steven Lyon Holley, Sullivan & Cromwell, New York, NY, Matthew L. Larrabee, Darryl Snider, A. Mari Maz-our, Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    
      Kenneth C. Bass, III, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Amicus Supporting Appellant.
   ORDER

Appellant has filed motions for stay pending appeal, to expedite appeal, and to file a deferred appendix. Appellee has filed a response in opposition to the motion for stay pending appeal, and a response consenting to the motion to expedite and to file a deferred appendix.

Potential intervenor, WildTangent, Inc., has filed a motion for leave to intervene, consented to by appellant. Appellee filed a response in opposition.

The Court grants the motions for stay, to expedite, and to file a deferred appendix. The Court denies the motion for leave to intervene; however, the papers filed by WildTangent, Inc., will be accepted as a brief amicus curiae.