Case ID: colo_25/html/0394-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mb. Justice Goddabd \n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 3602.]
    Orman & Crook v. Nelson et al.
    Opinion Eoi/lowed.
    This case is reversed on the opinion in the case of Orman & Crook v. Ryan Bros., ante, p. 383.
    
      Appeal from, the District Court of Pueblo County.
    
    Messrs. Waldbon & Devine, for appellants.
    Mr. John R. Dixon and Messrs. Pattebson, Richabdson & Hawkins, for appellees.
   Mb. Justice Goddabd

delivered the opinion of the court.

The questions presented by the record in this case are the same as those considered and determined in the preceding case of Orman & Crook v. Ryan Bros., ante, p. 383.

For the reasons given in the opinion filed therein, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Beversed and remanded.

Chiee Justice Hayt dissents.

Per Curiam.

The questions involved on this rehearing are the same, in principié, as those decided upon rehearing in the ease of Orman et al. v. Ryan et al., ante, p. 383. The decision in that case is decisive of this, and it follows that our original opinion should be adhered to, and it is so ordered.