Case ID: njl_57/html/0201-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ARTHUR E. BERRY, GUARDIAN, &c., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. ANNA M. POTTER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of Supreme Court, see 27 Vroom 454.
    For the plaintiff in error, Ephraim Cutter.
    
    For the defendant in error, Alan H. Strong.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Abbett, Depue, Garrison, Lippincott, Reed, Van Sycicel, Brown, Sims, Smith. 11.

For reversal — None.