Case ID: ark_335/html/0546-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DUGAL LOGGING, INC. v. ARKANSAS PULPWOOD COMPANY, INC., et al.
    
    98-973
    983 S.W.2d 126
    Supreme Court of Arkansas
    Opinion delivered December 21, 1998
    
      
      Vickery & Landers, PLLC, by: Michael R. Landers; and Burbank, Dodson & McDonald, by: Gary D. McDonald, for appellants.
    
      Harrell & Lindsey, P.A., by: Paul E. Lindsey, for appellees.
   Per Curiam.

On October 23, 1998, the court of appeals certified this matter to this court because it found that the case presented a question pertaining to interpretation of a rule. After reviewing the briefs filed by the parties, we have determined certification is proper on the issue of whether a motion to extend the time for filing the record was properly granted. Because determination of this issue involves the interpretation and application of Ark. R. App. P. — Civ. 5 and may result in dismissal of the appeal as requested by several of the appellants, we accept certification on this question only.