Case ID: ohio-law-abs_4/html/0756-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 977
    REALTY HOLDING INC. et v. STATE ex BELL
    No. 20086.
    Supreme Court
    On motion to certify.
    Dock. Sept. 4, 1926;
    4 Abs. 623.
    985. QUO WARRANTO — Can Court of Appeals, under a quo warranto proceeding, grant temporary restraining order, to oust corporation from state?
   The Holding Co. in the Supreme Court contends that the Court of Appeals has no power upon a quo warranto, to oust corporation from doing business in state because it permitted gambling, or to grant temporary restraining order forbidding same company to conduct business in furtherance of its unlawful conduct.

Attorneys — Joseph Heintzman; and Pogue, Hoffheimer & Pogue for Company; Chas. S. Bell for State ex; all of Cincinnati.