Case ID: ny_185/html/0585-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary E. Strong, Respondent, v. Emma Googins, Appellant.
    
      Strong v. Googins, 104 App. Div. 631, affirmed.
    (Argued May 22, 1906;
    decided June 5, 1906.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 6, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to compel the specific performance of a contract for the exchange of t'wo parcels of real property.
    
      Franklin Bien for appellant.
    
      Allen McCulloh and Henry Hill Pierce for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner and Hiscock, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.