Case ID: f-appx_50/html/0886-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re: William M. SCHMIDT and Gareth G. Schmidt, Debtors, Patricia Trunnels, Appellant, v. William M. Schmidt and Gareth Schmidt, husband and wife, Appellees.
    No. 01-35783.
    BAP No. MT-00-01349-BrPMo.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Nov. 8, 2002.
    Decided Nov. 15, 2002.
    Before TROTT, T.G. NELSON, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

The judgment of the bankruptcy appellate panel is AFFIRMED for the reasons set forth in the memorandum disposition of the bankruptcy appellate panel filed on July 9, 2001. Because the parties failed to submit excerpts of the adversary proceeding to the bankruptcy appellate panel, it was unable to determine whether the factual findings of the bankruptcy court were clearly erroneous. We have reviewed the entire transcript of the adversary proceeding, and we conclude that the bankruptcy court did not clearly err in its factual findings.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 
      
       This order is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     
      
      . Peklar v. Ikerd (In re Peklar), 260 F.3d 1035, 1037 (9th Cir.2001).