Case ID: ohio-law-abs_4/html/0738-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 930
    MOTOR FINANCE CO. v. HUNTSBERGER
    No. 20044.
    Supreme Court
    On motion to certify.
    Dock. Aug. 4, 1926;
    4 Abs. 541.
    147. BILLS & NOTES — Can auto finánce company recover upon notes purchased before maturity, when seller of automobile does not deliver specified model, but another which buyer accepts for temporary use only?
    Attorneys — Amerman & Mills, Canton, for Company.
   The Automobile Finance Company contends in the Supreme Court that it may recover upon notes purchased before maturity, given in payment of specified model of automobile to be delivered in future, even though specified model was^not delivered and another model was, which purchaser accepted but contends was for temporary use only.