Case ID: f-appx_297/html/0205-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Rohan St. Joseph KEATING, a/k/a Charles Joe, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 08-6989.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 14, 2008.
    Decided: Oct. 17, 2008.
    Rohan St. Joseph Keating, Appellant Pro Se. Carol M. Marx, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Scott W. Putney, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Rohan St. Joseph Keating appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Keating, No. 2:93-cr-00066-HCM-2 (E.D. Va. filed May 5, 2008; entered May 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.