Case ID: cust-ct_2/html/0693-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dallinger, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 41248.
    Protests 651448-G, etc., of F. W. Woolworth Co. (New York).
   Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel photo frames were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339. Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 47857) cited. Candleholders, vases, photo frames, candlesticks, boxes, and jewel boxes in chief value of metal plated with silver were held dutiable at 50 percent under paragraph 339. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445) and Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816) cited.