Case ID: ga_188/html/0212-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Duckworth, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Holmes et al. v. Crane, executor, et al.
    
    No. 12758.
    June 14, 1939.
    
      W. J. Laney and Harold F. Boland, for plaintiffs.
    
      Sam C. Crane, for defendants.
   Duckworth, Justice.

No error is assigned upon any ruling of tlie court made during the trial; but the motion for new trial contains only the general grounds that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it. Upon an examination of the brief of evidence contained in the record it appears that the verdict was authorized by the evidence. The judgment refusing a new trial is

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.