Case ID: sw3d_573/html/0764-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Richard E. FRENCH, Appellant.
    No. ED 106414
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    FILED: May 7, 2019
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Casey Allen Taylor, 1000 West Nifong, Bldg 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203.
    ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Justin Andrew Moody, Assistant Attorney General, 221 West High St., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
    Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM

Richard E. French ("Defendant") appeals from the trial court's judgment convicting him of burglary in the first degree, in violation of Section 569.160, RSMo 2000. Defendant claims that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). 
      
      Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 2000 as amended.