Case ID: nys_87/html/1133-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DOYLE, Appellant, v. W. L. DOUGLAS SHOE CO., Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    March 15, 1904.)
    Action by Margaret Doyle against the W. L. Douglas Shoe Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory judgment modified, by inserting provision therein allowing plaintiff costs of the demurrer as a condition for permitting defendant to answer, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs of both appeals to the plaintiff, on the authority of Tallman v. Bernhard, 75 Hun, 30, 27 N. Y. Supp. 6, and Harmon v. Vanderbilt Hotel Co., 79 Hun, 392, 29 N. Y. Supp. 783, affirmed 143 N. Y. 665, 39 N. E. 20.