Case ID: sw3d_452/html/0722-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Trent FAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    WD 77186
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Order filed: January 13, 2015
    Mark A. Grothoff, for Appellant.
    Mary H. Moore, for Respondent.
    Before Division Two: Joseph M. Ellis, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Trent Fay appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief by the Circuit Court of Sullivan County following an evidentiary hearing. Appellant contends that the motion court erred in denying his post-conviction relief motion because his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel by stipulating to the admission of the lab report into evidence at trial. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value; however, a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).