Case ID: f-appx_594/html/0597-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony MOBLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 14-11313
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Feb. 12, 2015.
    R. Brian Tanner, James D. Durham, T. Shane Mayes, Brian T. Rafferty, Edward J. Tarver, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Savannah, GA, Carlton R. Bourne, Jr., U.S. Attorney’s Office, Augusta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee,
    Mark A. Lanier, Law Office of Mark A. Lanier, Portal, GA, Anthony Mobley, Savannah, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Mark Lanier, appointed counsel for Anthony Mobley in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Mobley’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Given our resolution of Lanier’s Anders motion, we DENY AS MOOT Lanier’s motion to withdraw on other grounds, Mobley’s motion for appointment of alternate counsel, and Mobley’s motion for an extension of time to file an appellate brief.