Case ID: f-appx_697/html/0342-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anthony WHITEHURST; Anthony Whitehurst, ON BEHALF OF his Minor child M.W., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Thomas L. COUGILL; Charles T. Miers; Richard Simses; Jon C. Vicklund; James L. Ray; Kyle D. Giacco; William T. Green, III; Willingham, Fultz & Cougill, L.L.P.; Winstead, P.C.; Daw and Ray, L.L.P.; William T. Green, P.C.; Bill Burke, Defendants-Appellees
    Summary Calendar No. 17-20302
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    September 6, 2017
    Anthony Whitehurst, Baytown, TX, pro se.
    Kyle Douglas Giacco, Esq., Daw & Ray, L.L.P., Houston, TX, Demetri Anastasiad-is, Office of the Attorney General, Austin, TX, Murray Jules Fogler, Esq., William Tate Green, III, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Thomas L. Cougill, Houston, TX, pro se.
    William T. Green, III, Houston, TX, pro se.
    
      Kyle D. Giacco, pro se.
    Before REAVLEY, SOUTHWICK, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Having read all of Appellant’s brief and also the complaint that was filed to initiate the lawsuit. There is no legal claim of error that would give this court jurisdiction to change the judgment of the district court. Appellant has written well about historical problems and even about courts’ jurisdiction, but he fails to allege any legal right of his that has been violated or personal injury suffered as a consequence, This court must affirm the judgment appealed.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.