Case ID: f-appx_591/html/0291-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ruth E. ZUFELT, Plaintiff-Appellant v. HUNTINGTON INGALLS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 14-60240
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Jan. 29, 2015.
    Kaye Johnson Persons, Esq., Kaye J. Persons, P.L.L.C., Biloxi, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Brooks Eason, Michael Vincent Bernier, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C., Jackson, MS, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The court has considered this appeal in light of the briefs, district court opinion, and pertinent portions of the record. We find no reversible error of law or fact and affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the trial court. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.