Case ID: njl_60/html/0592-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "•Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MOSES JAMES, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. ANDREW KEYS, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiff in error, Francis E. Marsh.
    
    For the defendant in error, Thomas Anderson.
    
   •Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.

For affirmance—Collins, Dixon, Garrison, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Adams, Bogert, Hendrickson, Nixon. 9.

For reversal—None.