Case ID: ny3d_22/html/1051-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[4 NE3d 370, 981 NYS2d 358]
    Esther York, Appellant, v Joseph York, Respondent.
    Decided January 14, 2014
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Newman & Greenberg, New York City (Richard A. Greenberg, William J. Dobie and Gustave H. Newman of counsel), for appellant.
    
      Snitow Kanfer Holtzer & Millus, LLP, New York City (Frankly n H. Snitow of counsel), for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. The order below was not an abuse of discretion.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.