Case ID: ny-super-ct_61/html/0455-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "The Court (Dugro, J., writing, Gildersleeve, J., concurring)", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LOUISE LANGE, Respondent v. THE MANHATTAN RAILWAY COMPANY, et al., Appellants.
    
      Trial—Defendants should not be allowed to prove their defence on the cross-examination of plaintiff before plaintiff rests.
    
    Before Dugro and Gildersleeve, JJ.
    
      Decided July 5, 1892.
    Appeal by defendants from judgment entered upon verdict in plaintiff’s favor and from an order denying motion for a new trial. The action was brought to recover damages to the use of plaintiff’s premises caused by the maintenance and operation of defendants’ elevated railroad in sixth avenue in front thereof.
    
      Davies, Short & Townsend, for appellants.
    
      Byram L. Winters, attorney, and Edward S. Clinch of counsel, for respondent.
   The Court (Dugro, J., writing, Gildersleeve, J., concurring)

affirmed the judgment and order, with costs.