Case ID: f_160/html/1022-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CONNOLLY v. BOUCK et al.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    May 9, 1908.)
    No. 2,498.
    Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado.
    Hugh Butler, for appellant. H. Riddell, for appellees.
    Before SANBORN and HOOK, Circuit Judges, and PHILIPS, District Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

The appeal in this case is dismissed, upon the ground that the decree which it challenges is an interlocutory and not a final decree, upon the authority of Railway Company v. Simmons, 123 U. S. 52, 8 Sup. Ct. 58, 31 L. Ed. 73, Parsons v. Robinson, 122 U. S. 112, 7 Sup. Ct. 1153, 30 L. Ed. 1122, Chase v. Driver, 92 Fed. 780, 783, 784, 34 C. C. A. 668, 671, 672, and the cases there cited.