Case ID: sw3d_34/html/0208-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 77366.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Nov. 28, 2000.
    Jennifer S. Walsh, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER, III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

George Robinson (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29 .15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirmed Movant’s convictions for first degree assault, section 565.050, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo 1994, on direct appeal. State v. Robinson, 970 S.W.2d 840 (Mo.App. E.D.1998).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).