Case ID: so2d_336/html/0388-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James H. HALL and H. E. Garrett, Appellants, v. Jack ROSS and LSL Corporation, Appellees.
    No. 75-1124.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 21, 1976.
    Rehearing Denied Sept. 10, 1976.
    Harry M. Hobbs, Tampa, for appellants.
    Charles F. Clark and! Thomas B. Mimms, Jr., of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, for appellee Jack Ross.
    Thomas C. MacDonald, Jr., and Donald A. Gifford, of Shackleford, Farrior, Stal-lings & Evans, Tampa, for appellee LSL Corp.
   PER CURIAM.

After careful consideration of the voluminous trial record, the briefs, the order appealed, and the oral arguments of counsel, it is our judgment that the directed verdict rendered by the trial court in favor of the appellees/defendants, entered at the conclusion of the appellants’/plaintiffs’ case, is

AFFIRMED.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and BOARD-MAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.