Case ID: ny-super-ct_61/html/0465-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel J. Sprague, Appellant v. The Bartholdi Hotel Company, Respondent.
    Decided October 24, 1892.
    Appeal plaintiff from so much of an order granting his motion to correct the judgment roll, as imposed as a condition the payment of the costs of the trial, which resulted in a dismissal of the complaint.
    J. Noble Hayes, for appellant. Nathaniel Myers, for respondent.
    Before Freedman, P. J., and McAdam J.
   Per Curiam.

Order affirmed,

with $10 costs and disbursements.