Case ID: cust-ct_1/html/0367-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 39164.
    Protests 991737-G, etc., of Judkins & McCormick Co. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Hats and other articles in part of lace similar to those involved in Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Motifs and other articles in chief value of cellulose filaments were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31. Abstract 37230 followed.