Case ID: sc_203/html/0106-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

15566
    RUSH v. THOMPSON THOMPSON v. RUSH ET AL.
    
    (26 S. E. (2d), 411)
    July, 1942.
    
      
      Mr. Henry E. Davis and Messrs. Royall & Wright, all of Florence, S. C., Counsel for Appellant,
    
      
      Messrs. McEachin & Townsend, of Florence, S- C., Counsel for Respondent,
    
      July 26, 1943.
   PER CURIAM:

After a careful study and consideration of the record in this case, in the light of the issues made by the exceptions, and after considering the briefs of counsel, we are of'the opinion that the Circuit Court in its well-considered decree, correctly decided the case. We adopt that decree as the judgment of this Court. Let it be reported.

Judgment affirmed.

Messrs. Associate Justices Bakeeí, Fishburne and Stukes, and Circuit Judges SeasE and Henderson, Acting Associate Justices, concur.