Case ID: ny-super-ct_58/html/0584-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "The Court", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Samuel H. Huxford, Respondent v. Matilda S. Stoddart, Appellant.
    Decided June 27, 1890.
    Appeal by defendant from judgment entered in favor of plaintiff upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
    Alexander Thain and George William Hart, Jr., for appellant. Truax & Crandell, for respondent.
    Before Freedman and O’Gorman, JJ.
   The Court

held (Freedman, J., writing, O’Gorman, J., concurring) that the judgment and order should be affirmed with costs.