Case ID: ala-app_28/html/0027-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "RICE, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

177 So. 353
    SNELLGROVE v. STATE.
    4 Div. 388.
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    Nov. 23, 1937.
    L. A. Farmer, of Dothan, for appellant. 1
    A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., and John J. Haynes, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   RICE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of illegally having in possession “prohibited liquor.”

The State’s evidence made out every element of the offense charged. There was none opposed. The punishment inflicted was the minimum, under the law.

Without stultifying themselves, the jury could not have returned a verdict of acquittal.

So, misconduct on their part, even if it occurred — -which we do not decide — could not have worked prejudice to appellant.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.