Case ID: njl_50/html/0176-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOHN J. CRAIG ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. THE STATE, JAMES BRANDS, PROSECUTOR, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For opinion of the Supreme Court, see 20 Vroom 185.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment in this ease should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Dixon, Reed, Van Syckel, Beown, Clement, Mc-Geeooe, Pateeson, Whitaker. 10.

For reversal — None.