Case ID: sw2d_904/html/0464-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Constance C. RICE, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Walter RICE, Respondent/Appellant.
    No. 65921.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    June 27, 1995.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 14, 1995.
    Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 19, 1995.
    Charles M. Shaw, James J. Knappenber-ger, Charles M. Shaw Law Firm, Clayton, for appellant.
    Daniel P. Card, II, Paule, Camazine & Blumenthal, P.C., St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from that portion of the circuit court’s amendment to his Decree of Dissolution awarding wife twenty-five percent of husband’s military pension and fifty percent of husband’s civil service pension. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 84.16(b).