Case ID: f-appx_252/html/0323-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ann POWERS, Appellant v. Bill CLINTON, Former President of the United States of America, et al., Appellees.
    No. 07-5216.
    United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
    Oct. 24, 2007.
    Ann Powers, Washington, DC, pro se.
    BEFORE: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and HENDERSON and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(3). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed May 23, 2007, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the complaint because it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, its “factual contentions are clearly baseless,” and the action is frivolous. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en bane. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.