Case ID: f-appx_110/html/0737-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Roy D. MURPHY, Appellant.
    No. 03-2884.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 6, 2004.
    Decided Oct. 13, 2004.
    Jason T. Griess, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Rock Island, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Roy D. Murphy, Texarkana, TX, pro se.
    Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Roy Murphy pleaded guilty to conspiracy to manufacture and distribute at least 50 grams of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A) and § 846. Murphy appeals the sentence imposed by the district court. Murphy’s counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the court erred in including drugs intended for Murphy’s personal use in the Guidelines calculation of offense conduct. This argument, however, falls within the scope of an appeal waiver contained in Murphy’s plea agreement, and after careful consideration of both the language of the appeal waiver and the circumstances of this case, we see no reason not to enforce the waiver. See United States v. Woods, 346 F.3d 815, 817-18 (8th Cir.2003). Accordingly, we will not address Murphy’s argument.

Having found no nonfrivolous issues after reviewing the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. 
      
      . The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.