Case ID: so2d_316/html/0660-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Henry Bernard SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. X-472.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Aug. 13, 1975.
    Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and David J. Busch, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We have carefully examined the record on appeal and the briefs filed by able counsel. Although the evidence giving rise to the entry of the judgment and sentence here appealed was in conflict those conflicts were resolved by the trier of fact for whose judgment we may not substitute ours. We find no error of law as applied to those facts. Further, the briefs of the parties reveal that each point here presented has been heretofore determined by decisions of the Supreme Court and other appellate courts of Florida. Nothing would be added to the jurisprudence of this state by again discussing those points here.

Appellant having failed to demonstrate prejudicial error, the judgment and sentence appealed are

Affirmed.

BOYER, C. J., and RAWLS and McCORD, JJ., concur.