Case ID: njl_5/html/0825-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "The Court.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hunter against Budd and Jones.
    Ku]e t0 pjea¿ 
    
    THE writ was returned to February term. At May term no proceeding was had. At September, a rule was taken for defendant to plead in thirty days or judgment. A copy of this rule was not served on defendant, and he did not plead. And now there was motion for judgment. But by
    
      
      - vs. Dill, 1 Hal. 168. Snediker vs. Quick, 1 Gr. 245. Sassenburgh vs. Sharer, 2 Hal. 170. Berry vs. Cohanan, 2 Hal. 135. Halsey ads. Miller, 1 Har. 63. Harwood vs. Smethurst, 2 Vr. 502.
      
    
   The Court.

A copy of the rule must be served or judgment cannot be taken.