Case ID: f_239/html/1023-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WILKINS v. SWARTZ.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    February 21, 1917.)
    No. 2952.
    In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Rufus E. Foster, Judge.
    W. B. Spencer, Charles Payne Fenner, Philip S. Gidiere, Esmond Phelps, and W. B. Le Bourgeois, all of New Orleans, La., for plaintiff in error.
    Edward N. Pugh and Walter Lemann, both of Donaldsonville, La., for defendant in error.
    Before WALKER, Circuit Judge, and GRUBB, District Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

We .are of opinion that the action of the trial court in this case in denying the plaintiff’s motion for judgment in his favor was correct. The assignment of that action as error is not sustainable. The judgment under review is affirmed.