Case ID: ad_224/html/0842-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Benjamin Barkin, Respondent, v. Saul Brynes, Trading as S. Brynes & Company, Appellant.
    (Appeal No. 2.)
   Order granting plaintiff’s motion for defendant’s examination before trial affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. While the notice of motion is improper in the use of the words “ whether or not,” it does not call for reversal on tMs ground. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur.