Case ID: sw3d_463/html/0809-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William CARSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    ED 101039
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    
    Filed: March 24, 2015
    Andrew E. Zleit, Missouri Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for Appellant.
    Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

William Carson (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims the motion court clearly erred in denying his post-conviction motion because his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to: (1) locate and call a witness at trial; and (2) limit testimony regarding his alleged prior misconduct. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying post-conviction relief. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).