Case ID: njl_41/html/0192-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

W. W. CONOVER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. STAPLES AND LAFETRA, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiff in error, W. L. Dayton and J. D. Bedle.
    
    For the defendant in error, F. D. Gillmore.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dahrimple, Dixon, Reed, Woodhull, Clement, Dodd, Green, Lathrop, Lilly, Wales — 12.

For reversal — None.