Case ID: f-appx_176/html/0842-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Timothy Ray GLOVER, Defendant—Appellant.
    Nos. 04-10223, 05-10702.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted April 5, 2006.
    
    Filed April 19, 2006.
    William L. Shipley, Dawrence W. Rice, Jr., USF—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Ann H. Voris, Esq., FPDCA—Federal Public Defender’s Office, Fresno, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Timothy Ray Glover appeals from two judgments of the district court which revoked his supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Glover’s arguments are foreclosed by Johnson v. United States, 529 U.S. 694, 713, 120 S.Ct. 1795, 146 L.Ed.2d 727 (2000), which held that both custody and an additional term of supervised release could be imposed when the district court revoked supervised release. We reject Glover’s attempt to limit the application of Johnson.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.