Case ID: pa_639/html/0333-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

160 A.3d 764
    CITY OF ARNOLD, Pennsylvania, Respondent v. WAGE POLICY COMMITTEE OF the CITY OF ARNOLD POLICE DEPARTMENT, o/b/o Pamela Cimino, Petitioners
    No. 238 WAL 2016
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    October 26, 2016
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of October, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Is a dispute between a union and a municipality arising out of a surviving spouse’s pension benefit arbitrable under the Collective Bargaining by Policemen or Firemen Act, 43 P.S. §§ 217.1-217.10, where the benefit was afforded to the surviving spouse of a police officer or firefighter statutorily, and incorporated into the parties collective bargaining agreement?