Case ID: f-appx_138/html/0296-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rick DRUMMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF BRUNSWICK, GEORGIA, Bradford S. Brown, In his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Brunswick, Georgia, and in his individual capacity, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 05-11127
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    June 29, 2005.
    Leon Eugene Highsmith, Eugene Highsmith, Professional Corp., Brunswick, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Phillip E. Friduss, Hall, Booth, Smith & Slover, PC, Atlanta, GA, Norman Daniel Lovein, Hall, Booth, Smith & Slover, PC, Brunswick, GA, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before CARNES, MARCUS and COX, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Rick Drummond (Plaintiff) filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City of Brunswick, Georgia, Bradford S. Brown, and Roosevelt Harris, Jr. (Defendants).

The district court dismissed the Plaintiffs substantive due process claim against all Defendants, and the procedural due process claims against the City, pursuant to the Defendants’ Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion. (R.1-25.) Thereafter, the court dismissed the Plaintiffs procedural due process claims and state law claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress against Brown and Harris on these Defendants’ Rule 56 motion for summary judgment, thereby disposing of all remaining claims. (R.2-68.) The Plaintiff appeals.

The Plaintiff contends that the district court erred: (1) in dismissing the substantive due process claims; (2) in granting summary judgment on the procedural due process claims; and (3) in granting summary judgment on the state law claim.

We discern no reversible error. All claims were properly dismissed for the reasons stated in the district court’s orders referenced in this opinion.

AFFIRMED.