Case ID: f-appx_177/html/0149-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ibrahima BARO, Petitioner, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
    No. 02-4513-ag.
    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    April 20, 2006.
    Ronald S. Salomon, New York, New York, for Petitioner.
    For Respondent: Because the Court did not receive a brief from the respondent within fifteen days of the December 12, 2005 due date specified in the scheduling order issued on November 18, 2005, this case has been decided without the benefit of respondent’s brief. See Local Rule 0.29(d).
    PRESENT: Hon. WALKER, Chief Judge, Hon. RALPH K. WINTER, and Hon. ROSEMARY S. POOLER, Circuit Judges.
   SUMMARY ORDER

Ibrahima Baro, though counsel, petitions for review of the BIA decision affirming the decision of an immigration judge (“IJ”) denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case. We note that this case was decided without the benefit of a brief from the government.

The IJ denied Baro asylum on three separate and independent bases, including Baro’s firm resettlement in Senegal. Baro failed to appeal to the BIA the IJ’s firm resettlement finding. Therefore, we lack jurisdiction to consider his appeal on this issue. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1); Gill v. INS, 420 F.3d 82, 86 (2d Cir.2005). We have no need to reach the additional bases on which the IJ denied asylum.

Moreover, Baro failed to raise the CAT claim in his brief to this Court and therefore those claims are deemed waived. Yueqing Zhang v. Gonzales, 426 F.3d 540, 542 n. 1 (2d Cir.2005).

For the foregoing reasons, the petition for review is DENIED. Having completed our review, any stay of removal that the Court previously granted in this petition is VACATED, and any pending motion for a stay of removal in this petition is DENIED as moot. Any pending request for oral argument in this petition is DENIED in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 34(a)(2), and Second Circuit Local Rule 34(d)(1).