Case ID: f-appx_275/html/0242-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edson FURTADO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sheila DAVENPORT, CEO; Lawrence Taylor, Capt.; State of Maryland; Paulo Negro, Dr., Defendants-Appel-lees.
    No. 08-6223.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 24, 2008.
    Decided: April 30, 2008.
    
      Edson Furtado, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   PER CURIAM:

Edson Furtado appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Furtado’s motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Furtado v. Davenport, No. 8:07-cv-02996-RWT (D.Md. Jan. 24, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.