Case ID: cow_4/html/0056-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      \n      Curia.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

May against Richardson and others.
    for a bill of particulars beluteajinstüié plaintiff, the movodaformaa rule that the and™ pay the costs of the motion, or that judgment of SH? l°
    the 30th September last, an Order for a bill of particulars was made absolute against the plaintiff upon a regular or^er t° show cause, and served on the agent of the plaintiff’s attorney on the 9th October.
    A motion was now made for judgment of non-pros; and that the plaintiff pay the costs of this motion,
    
      J. S. Tallmadge, for the motion,
    A. C. Paige, contra.
   Curia.

Upon an order for a bill of particulars absolute against the plaintiff, the defendant moves this Court, who. make a rule for judgment of non-pros, nisi. As the party disobeying the order is in fault, it is reasonable that he should pay the costs of the motion. In this case, let the plaintiff deliver a bill in 20 days, and pay the costs of this motion or judgment of non-pros may be entered.

Rule accordingly.