Case ID: a2d_984/html/0937-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Emanuel BEATTY, Petitioner v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, et al., Respondents.
    No. 115 EM 2009.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Dec. 10, 2009.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of December, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, treated as a Petition for Review, the Petition to Supplement the Record, and the “Motion for Sanctions and to Quash Petition to Supplement the Record of the Permission for Allowance of Appeal” are DENIED.