Case ID: fla_160/html/0579-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "TERRELL, J.: BARNS, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FRANCIS P. CONROY, et al., etc., v. CARDELE BROWER, et al., etc.
    36 So. (2nd) 190
    June 15, 1948
    June Term, 1948
    En Banc
    
      Edwin C. Coffee, for appellant.
    
      Austin Miller, for appellee.
   TERRELL, J.:

At the oral argument this case and the case of Milton Weiss, et al. v. Herberta Leonardy, et al., were consolidated and argued together. The latter case was decided this date. The parties were different and both cases arose from a different source but they were prosecuted under Section 87.01, Florida Statutes 1941, for a common purpose and a similar decree resulted. The questions raised in this case are similar to those presented in Milton Weiss, et al., v. Herberta Leonardy, et al., so the judgment appealed from is affirmed on authority of the latter case.

Affirmed.

THOMAS, C. J., CHAPMAN, ADAMS and HOBSON, JJ., concur.

SEBRING and BARNS, JJ., dissent.

BARNS, J.,

dissenting:

I dissent upon the basis stated in my dissenting opinion in Milton Weiss, et al., v. Herberta Leonardy, et al., this day decided.