Case ID: so2d_88/html/0147-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Laszlo BEKE and Maria Beke, his wife, Appellants, v. The ESTATE of Frank MOLNAR, and John H. Coker, Devisee under the Last Will and Testament of Frank Molnar and Piroska Gedon Molnar, Appellees.
    Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A.
    July 18, 1956.
    Rehearing Denied Sept. 13, 1956.
    Philip G. Nourse, Fort Pierce, for appellants.
    Willes & Bittan, Fort Pierce, for Estate of Frank Molnar.
    Raymond E. Ford, Fort Pierce, for John H. Coker, Devisee.
    Sumner & Sumner, Fort Pierce, for Pi-roska Gedon Molnar.
   PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

TERRELL, Acting C. J., and THOMAS, HOBSON and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.