Case ID: f-appx_305/html/0148-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David BABB, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee, and William Lunsford, Seizing DEA Agent, Defendant.
    No. 08-1844.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 12, 2008.
    Decided: Dec. 31, 2008.
    David Babb, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

David Anthony Babb appeals from the district court’s oral order in this civil forfeiture case denying his motion to void its earlier judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4). We have reviewed the record and the arguments of the parties and find no reversible error. See Schwartz v. United States, 976 F.2d 213, 217 (4th Cir.1992) (providing standard in Rule 60(b)(4) action). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.