Case ID: f-appx_158/html/0424-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Tammy S. MIZELL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SARA LEE CORPORATION, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 05-1754.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 30, 2005.
    Decided Dec. 13, 2005.
    John Michael Loeschen, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. John Richard Erickson, Reed Smith, L.L.P., Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Tammy S. Mizell appeals the district court’s order denying Mizell’s breach of employment contract claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mizell v. Sara Lee Corp., No. CA-05-129-2-JBF (E.D. Va. June 10, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED