Case ID: so2d_716/html/0752-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HOOPER, Chief Justice. COOK, Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte David Eugene JOHNSON. (In re David Eugene JOHNSON v. STATE).
    1970829.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    May 22, 1998.
    Frank B. Angarola, Athens, for petitioner.
    No brief filed for respondent.
   HOOPER, Chief Justice.

WRIT DENIED. NO OPINION.

ALMON, HOUSTON, and LYONS, JJ., concur.

COOK, J., concurs specially.

COOK, Justice

(concurring specially).

I concur in the denial of the petition. In doing so, I do not wish to be understood as agreeing with the conclusion of the Court of Criminal Appeals that the years added to a defendant’s sentence by the enhancement provisions of Ala.Code 1975, §§ 13A-12-250 and -270 must run consecutively where the indictment for which the defendant stands convicted has alleged more than one sale. I recognize that this Court has not decided this precise issue; however, because the defendant’s conviction has been reversed for other reasons, this present case is not correctly postured for the Court to decide this issue.