Case ID: ad2d_37/html/0636-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Claim of Margie Rivera, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
   Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed March 11,1970, which disallowed a claim for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. There was substantial evidence to support the board’s finding that claimant’s employment was that of a clerk, not enumerated as a hazardous occupation under section 3 of said law, and that her duties did not require her to operate a hand truck nor was she operating same. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Greenblott, Cooke and Simons, JJ., concur.