Case ID: pa_373/html/0307-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dipple v. Pittsburgh, Appellant.
    Argued March 26, 1953.
    Before Stern, C. J., Stearne, Jones, Chidsey, Musmanno and Arnold, JJ.
    
      J. Howard Devlin, Assistant City Solicitor, with him Anne X. Alpern, City Solicitor, and J. Frank McKenna, Assistant City Solicitor, for appellant.
    
      Allen H. Berkman, for appellee.
    April 13, 1953:
   Opinion

Per Curiam,

The appeal in this case was not taken within three calendar months, as prescribed by statute, after the order of the court below was entered. Therefore, lacking jurisdiction, we are obliged to quash the appeal of our own motion, which we do the less reluctantly because of the satisfactory disposition by Judge Marshall, speaking for the court en banc, of the questions submitted to the court in the case stated.

Appeal quashed.