Case ID: sw2d_895/html/0644-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James WEBSTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 66528.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    March 28, 1995.
    Nancy L. Vincent, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Koeot, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the action of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).