Case ID: so3d_263/html/0285-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CITY OF ORLANDO, Appellant, v. Carlus L. HAYNES and Carlos M. Romero, Appellees.
    Case No. 5D18-953
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Opinion filed February 5, 2019
    Derek J. Angell, of O'Connor & O'Connor, LLC, Orlando, for Appellant.
    Carlus L. Haynes, of Law Office of Haynes and Laurent, P.A., Orlando, pro se, and Bradley N. Laurent, of Law Office of Haynes and Laurent, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.
    No Appearance for Appellee, Carlos M. Romero.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Hayes v. State, 94 So.3d 452, 461 (Fla. 2012) ("[T]he proper remedy when the trial court fails to abide by its duty under the Melbourne[ v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla. 1996) ] procedure is to reverse and remand for a new trial.").

EVANDER, C.J. and GROSSHANS and SASSO, JJ., concur.