Case ID: nc_227/html/0697-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. POLK COUNTY: G. C. FEAGAN, E. G. THOMPSON and W. J. SCREVEN, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF POLK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, and MAX H. FEAGAN, Treasurer and Tax Collector of POLK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.
    (Filed 24 September, 1947.)
    Taxation § 38c—
    Where the tax collector is also treasurer of the county, a written demand for the return of taxes paid to him under protest addressed to him in his capacity as tax collector without the appellation “treasurer” is a reasonable compliance with the statute, G. S., 105-267, and will support an action for the recovery of the taxes.
    DEFENDANT’S appeal from Pless, J., at January Term, 1947, of Pole.
    
      W. T. Joyner ancl Jones •& Ward for plaintiff, appellee.
    
    
      J. T. Arledge and S. (?. Bernard for defendant, appellant.
    
   Per Curiam.

The plaintiff paid to Max H. Feagan, who is botb Tax Collector and Treasurer of Polk County, certain taxes under protest, and later demanded their return. G. S., 105-267. The written demand was addressed to “Max IT. Feagan, Tax Collector,” without the appellation, “Treasurer.” It is clear that the tax was illegal and if the demand had been made on Feagan as Treasurer its return would have been proper, and required by law. The only question in the case is whether the demand addressed as stated, is a valid compliance with the statute.

Looking at the reality of the situation the Court is of the opinion that the demand actually brought to the attention of Feagan as Treasurer the demand and the information required by the statute in reasonable compliance with its purpose; and that neither law nor equity is satisfied by withholding the funds.

The judgment of the lower court is

Affirmed.