Case ID: f-appx_56/html/0185-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mario L. BALLARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CHIEF OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT STATE POLICE, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 02-7786.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 20, 2003.
    Decided Feb. 26, 2003.
    Mario L. Ballard, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Mario L. Ballard appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny Ballard’s petition for writ of mandamus and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ballard v. Chief of Va. Dep’t State Police, No. CA-02-202 (E.D. Va. Nov. 1, 2002; Nov. 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.