Case ID: pa-super_62/html/0001-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bogh v. Wilmer & Vincent Theatre Company, Appellant.
    
      Appeals — Quashing appeal — Defective paper-hooks — Assignments of error — Exceptions.
    An appeal will be dismissed where the assignments of error are not printed in appellant’s paper book, and where an assignment of error to the refusal of a point shows no exception taken to such refusal.
    Refusal of a motion for a new trial cannot be assigned as error.
    Argued Dec. 7, 1915.
    Appeal, No. 60, Sept. T., 1913, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Lehigh Co., Sept. T., 1913, No. 60, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Albert E. Bogh v. Wilmer & Vincent Theatre Company.
    Before Bioe, P. J., Orlady, Head, Porter, Henderson, Kephart and Trexler, JJ.
    Appeal quashed.
    Motion to quash appeal.
    The motion to quash was for the following reasons:
    1. The appellant has not printed the assignments of errors in his paper book as required by rule of court.
    2. The assignments of error as filed are not sufficient because as to
    (a) No exception was taken in the court below to its refusal to affirm the point submitted by appellant.
    
      (b) Error will not lie to tbe action of tbe court below discharging appellant’s rule for a motion for, a new trial.
    (c) No assignable error appears upon tbe record.
    
      Dallas Dillinger, Jr., with bim Max 8. Erdman, for appellant.
    
      Olrnde T. Reno, with bim John L. Schwartz, for appellee.
    December 20,1915:
   Pee Cueiam,

Tbe appeal is quashed, at tbe costs of tbe appellant, for tbe reasons .assigned in support of tbe appellee’s motion.