Case ID: f-appx_110/html/0398-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Noe SANCHEZ, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-41496.
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Decided Oct. 1, 2004.
    Mitchel Neurock, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Laredo, TX, James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    William Edward May, Jr, Law Offices of Bill May, Corpus Christi, TX, for Defendanh-Appellant.
    Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Noe Sanchez, Jr. appeals the sentence imposed following his jury conviction for conspiracy to transport aliens within the United States and three counts of transporting aliens within the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(ii), (v)(I), and (v)(II). Sanchez argues that his 72-month sentence for the conspiracy offense exceeds the statutory maximum sentence of five years in the absence of a jury finding that the offense was committed for private financial gain. The plain language of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(B)(i) provides that the penalty for conspiracy to transport aliens within the United States is ten years. The statute does not require a showing that the conspiracy offense was committed for commercial advantage or private financial gain. The statute further provides that the penalty for the offense of transporting aliens under 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(ii), (iii), and (iv) , in which the offense was committed for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain, is ten years. Because the portion of the statute applicable to the conspiracy offense does not require proof of commercial advantage or private financial gain, Sanchez’s 72-month sentence for the conspiracy offense does not exceed the ten-year statutory maximum sentence for this offense, and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is inapplicable. Sanchez’s sentence on count one is affirmed.

Sanchez was also convicted for aiding and abetting the transportation of illegal aliens within the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) and (v) (II). The statutory maximum sentence for these offenses is five years. 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(B)(ii); see also United States v. Nolasco-Rosas, 286 F.3d 762, 767 (5th Cir.2002). Sanchez’s 72-month sentence for counts two, three, and four, for transporting aliens within the United States exceeds the five-year statutory maximum sentence for these offenses. Therefore, it is an illegal sentence, and its imposition constitutes plain error. United States v. Sias, 227 F.3d 244, 246 (5th Cir.2000). Sanchez’s sentence on counts two, three, and four is vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing on those counts.

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.