Case ID: ind_64/html/0597-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Howk, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stedman v. The State.
    From the Marion Criminal Circuit Court.
    
      R. B. Duncan. C. W. Smith and J. S. Duncan, for appellant.
    
      T. W. Woollen, Attorney Genera], J. B. Elam, Prosecuting Attorney, C. Baker, T. A. Hendricks, O. B. Hord and A. W Hendricks, for the State.
   Howk, C. J.

The questions presented for decision in this case are substantially the same as those which were considered and decided by this court, in the case of Fry v. The State, 63 Ind. 552, at this term.

For the reasons given in the case cited, the judgment is affirmed in this case, at the appellant’s costs.