Case ID: nj-super_21/html/0330-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Ctjbiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WILLIAM HAYTKO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM CRABB AND CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
    Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
    Argued September 8, 1952
    Decided September 16, 1952.
    Before Judges Jayne, Peoctob, and Schettino.
    
      Mr. Marshall Crowley argued the cause fox appellant (Messrs. Toner, Crowley •& Aclcerman, attorneys; Mr. Robert A. Vanderbilt, on the brief).
    
      Mr. Harry Cohn argued the cause for respondent.
   The opinion of the court was delivered

Pee Ctjbiam.

We concur in the conclusion expressed by Judge Erancis and reported in 17 N. J. Super. 95 (Co. Ct., Law Div., 1951).

Affirmed.