Case ID: la_262/html/1165-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SUMMERS, J., BARHAM, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

266 So.2d 446
    Alice Evelyn TITARD et al. v. LUMBERMEN’S MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY.
    No. 52773.
    Sept. 28, 1972.
   SUMMERS, J.,

I am of the opinion the writ should be granted solely for the reason that the Court of Appeal failed to find facts upon which its opinion is based. See Dick v. Phillips, 253 La. 366, 218 So.2d 299 (1969). In my view, based upon the reasons assigned by the trial court, the judgment complained of is correct.

BARHAM, J.,

concurs in the granting of the writ hut would by per curiam, and without docketing, remand to the Court of Appeal for written reasons for its judgment.