Case ID: ad2d_112/html/0172-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Peterson, Appellant.
   Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Giaccio, J.), rendered July 5, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Despite certain inconsistencies in the complainant’s testimony and the fact that complainant had a criminal record, the resolution of his credibility was a matter for the trier of fact and his testimony does not “compel the conclusion that a reasonable doubt existed as a matter of law” (People v La Borde, 76 AD2d 869, 870).

Defendant’s other contentions are without merit. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.