Case ID: sw2d_734/html/0314-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stephen Paul BENSKIN, Respondent-Appellant, v. Eileen Marie BENSKIN, Petitioner-Respondent.
    No. 52712.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Aug. 11, 1987.
    Gary S. Heggs, St. Charles, for respondent-appellant.
    Claude C. Knight, St. Charles, for petitioner-respondent.
   ORDER

Dissolution case. Husband appeals. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).