Case ID: sd_54/html/0507-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HOFEMANN, Respondent, v. JAMES MURPHY HARMS SUPPLY CO., et al, Appellants.
    (223 N. W. 719.)
    (File No. 6317.
    Opinion filed February 21, 1929.)
    
      Kelley & Luby and Nidi & Royhl, all of Huron, for Appellants.
    
      Bruell & Henderson, of Redfield, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The facts here involved are fully set out in the opinion in Fuller v. James Murphy Harms Supply Company, a Corporation, et al, case No. 6315, 223 N. W. 713 (opinion this day filed), and, upon the authority of that case, the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed.