Case ID: f-appx_711/html/0180-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Wanda J. BURKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James RODGER, Norfolk Neighborhood Development; Cleve Chappell; David Firnstalh; Josh Haight; Ronald Lee; Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority, Renovation Department, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 17-2199
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: February 15, 2018
    Decided: February 16, 2018
    Wanda J. Burks, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wanda J. Burks appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. .R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burks v. Rodger, No. 2:17-cv-00390-MSD-RJK (E.D. Va. Sept. 13, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED 
      
       Although the district court dismissed the action without prejudice, the district court’s order is a final appealable order under Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc,, 807 F.3d 619, 623 (4th Cir. 2015), and Martin v. Duffy, 858 F.3d 239, 247 (4th Cir. 2017) (“repeated, ineffective attempts at amendment suggest that further amendment of the complaint would be futile”).