Case ID: nys_106/html/1147-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

TAMBLIN et al., Respondents, v. DONELY et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    October 2, 1907.)
    Action by James I. Tamblin and others against Frank Donely and others.
   PER CURIAM.

Motion to dismiss appeal as to John F. Donely and Frank Donely denied, with §10 costs and disbursements. Held that, in order to raise on the merits the question here presented, the attorneys for the respondents should have promptly notified the attorney for the appellants that he refused to recognize his notice of appeal for all defendants.