Case ID: so2d_385/html/0150-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Irwin N. PASKOW and Joan B. Paskow, his wife, Appellants, v. Leo MARTIN and Gloria Martin, his wife, Appellees.
    No. 79-769.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 24, 1980.
    Rehearing Denied July 18, 1980.
    Bartel & Shuford and Bill Shuford, Jr., Miami, for appellants.
    Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Edward A. Perse, Miami, Smith, Mandler, Smith, Wer-ner, Jacobowitz & Fried, Miami Beach, for appellees.
    Before HENDRY, HUBBART and BAS-KIN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The final judgment under review, which was entered by the trial court upon remand after our prior decision in Martin v. Paskow, 339 So.2d 266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), is affirmed based on the rules of law stated in Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13, 16 (Fla.1976); Cuna Mutual Insurance Society v. Adamides, 334 So.2d 75, 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Delalio v. Food Palace, Inc., 330 So.2d 835, 836-837 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).