Case ID: f-appx_56/html/0173-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Simon KINSINGER, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-2120.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 20, 2003.
    Decided Feb. 26, 2003.
    Simon Kinsinger, Appellant Pro Se. David I. Pincus, Kenneth W. Rosenberg, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Simon Kinsinger appeals from the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion to enforce an IRS summons. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Kinsinger, No. MISC-02-3-5 (W.D.Va. Sept. 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.