Case ID: njl_35/html/0484-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CLAFLIN ET AL. v. VOORHEES.
    Matter of practice.
    
      F. Kingman, for the defendant,
    moved to set aside an alias execution, issued on a judgment obtained in 1858, because no notice was given nor sufficient order made, as required by section forty-two of act of 1855. (Nix. Dig. 788, § 162.)
    Argued before Justices Bedle, Dalrimple, and Scudder.
    
      
      
        Rev., p. 879, § 201.
    
   Per Curiam.

Execution having issued within a year after the recovery of the judgment' and returned unsatisfied, the plaintiff could lawfully issue an alias without a special order. Such is only required in cases where no execution has been issued within six years after the recovery of the judgment.

Motion denied.