Case ID: nj-misc_5/html/0885-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FREDERICK E. MOHRMANN, PROSECUTOR, v. TOWN OF BLOOMFIELD ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
    Argued September 9, 1927
    Decided September 15, 1927.
    Municipalities — Ordinances—Contracts for Fire Hose — No Irregularity Found.
    On application for writs of certiorari.
    
    Before Justices Trenchard, Kaltsor and Katzenbacii.
    Eor the'prosecutor, Thomas Brunetio.
    
    Eor the defendant Fabric Eire Hose Company, Osborne & Asllrnj.
    
    Eor the defendant town of Bloomfield, Raymond F. Davis.
    
   Two writs are applied for; one to review an ordinance of the town of Bloomfield appropriating money for the purchase of fire hose, and another to review the resolution awarding the contract to the Fabric Fire Hose Company.

After full and careful examination of the points made by the prosecutor in the light of affidavits we are of the opinion that there is no irregularity either in the ordinance or the resolution, or in the proceedings leading up to either, sufficient in our judgment to justify us in awarding either writ applied for.

Both applications are denied accordingly, but without costs.