Case ID: nj-eq_67/html/0727-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Elsie M. Folwell, respondent, v. Thomas G. Folwell, appellant.
    [Argued March 16th, 1904.
    Decided September 30th, 1904.]
    On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Reed, whose opinion is reported in 65 N. J. Eq. (20 Bide.) 526.
    
    
      Mr. John F. Earned, for the appellant*.
    
      Mr. Norman Grey, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree of the court of chancery is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Reed.

For affirmance — Dixon, Garrison, Port, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Veedenburgi-i, Vroom, Green, Gray — 10.

For reversal — None.