Case ID: so2d_734/html/1200-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ralph Nathaniel MILLER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 98-2561.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 7, 1999.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Godfrey, Julie M. Levitt, and Beth C. Weitzner, Assistant Public Defenders, Miami, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Christine E. Zahralban, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before GODERICH, SHEVIN and SORONDO, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Because the reason given by the trial court for entering the departure sentence is not supported by the record, see Scurry v. State, 489 So.2d 25, 28-29 (Fla.1986), we reverse and remand for resentencing within the guidelines. See Lattimore v. State, 571 So.2d 99, 100-01 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), dismissed, 584 So.2d 998 (Fla.1991). As this issue is dispositive, the remaining issue raised by the defendant is moot.

Reversed and remanded.