Case ID: ohio-st_104/html/0612-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Application of Steve Popinoch for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
    
      Intoxicating liquors — Unlawful manufacture and sale — Excessive fine — Habeas corpus.
    
    (No. 17328
    Decided March 21, 1922.)
    Error to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.
    
      Messrs. Hull & Hull, for relator.
    
      Mr. Edward C. Stanton, prosecuting attorney, contra.
    
   It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; for the reason that it clearly appears from the averments of the application for a writ of habeas corpus itself that the conviction, commitment and restraint of the applicant were not only not in violation of bnt were in pursuance of due process of law.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Johnson, Hough, Wanamaker, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.