Case ID: njl_112/html/0502-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JULIA CONNOLLY, RESPONDENT, v. PALISADES REALTY AND AMUSEMENT COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Submitted February 16, 1934
    Decided April 12, 1934.
    For the respondent, Thomas J. Stanton.
    
    For the appellant, Walter W. Huhley, Jr.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.