Case ID: so2d_443/html/0342-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nathaniel SHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 83-630.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Dec. 28, 1983.
    Jerry Hill, Public Defender, L.S. Alper-stein, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow.
    Nathaniel Shaw, pro se.
    
      Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel Shaw appeals a judgment and sentence rendered following an order denying his motion to discharge under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191.

Shaw’s attorney filed an Anders brief. Upon notification of this fact, Shaw filed a pro se brief. After an independent examination of the record and the law, we find no merit to this appeal.

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur. 
      
      . Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). -•