Case ID: f2d_806/html/1410-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MOTION PICTURE & VIDEOTAPE EDITORS GUILD, LOCAL 776, I.A.T.S.E., and International Photographers Guild, Local 659, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/Appellees, v. INTERNATIONAL SOUND TECHNICIANS, CINETECHNICIANS AND TELEVISION ENGINEERS OF The MOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION INDUSTRIES, LOCAL 695 (“LOCAL 695”), Defendants/Counter-Claimants/Appellants.
    No. 85-6559.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Dec. 29, 1986.
    Timothy J. Sargent, Bodkin, McCarthy, Sargent & Smith, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants/counter-claimants/appellants.
    Before ANDERSON, PREGERSON, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

The opinion filed September 26, 1986 is amended by adding a new footnote at 800 F.2d at 975, second column, at the end of the first paragraph, as follows:

“We do not intend to suggest by our discussion in the text that the district court did not have jurisdiction over the suit as an initial matter. See United Ass’n of Journeymen of Plumbing Industry, AFL-CIO v. Local 334, 452 U.S. 615, 627 [101 S.Ct. 2546, 2553, 69 L.Ed.2d 280] (1981) (holding that § 301 grants the federal courts jurisdiction over disputes between locals and internationals regarding union constitutions, but leaving open the question of ‘the substantive law to apply’).”

With this amendment, the petition for rehearing is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.