Case ID: njl_64/html/0364-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JAMES McGRATH, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. HANNAH V. H. T. HERVEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued November 24, 1899
    Decided November 24, 1899.
    On error to the Hudson Circuit.
    For the plaintiff in error, Charles C. Black.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Hudson Circuit is reversed.

For affirmance—None.

For reversal — The Chief Justice, Depue, Vah Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh. 13.