Case ID: f-appx_436/html/0360-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ruben GOMEZ-LUEVANO, also known as Ruben Gomez, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 10-10712
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Aug. 9, 2011.
    Susan Cowger, Cara Foos Pierce, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Gregory Don Sherwood, Esq., Law Office of Gregory Sherwood, Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    
      Before KING, GARZA, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Ruben Gomez-Luevano on appeal has filed a renewed motion for leave to withdraw and an amended brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gomez-Luevano filed a response to counsel’s initial motion and a supplemental pleading withdrawing his ineffective assistance of counsel claim.

We have reviewed counsel’s amended brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Gomez-Luevano’s response and supplemental filing. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.