Case ID: ri-dec_8/html/0236-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WALSH, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alexander E. Fraser vs. Walter A. Wright
    Eq. No. 10840.
    March 11, 1932.
    For complainant: Huddy & Moulton.
    For respondent: Tillinghast & 'Collins.
   DECISION.

WALSH, J.

Re-argued upon motion of petitioner after decision for respondent.

After ’ a full discussion of the facts and law involved, we are unable to discover any new and material evidence which causes us to change our recent decision. The decision heretofore filed, therefore, must stand.