Case ID: sw2d_920/html/0143-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LINDELL TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Virginia B. FEINBERG and Daniel B. Feinberg, Defendants/Appellants.
    No. 68482.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    April 16, 1996.
    Gary M. Siegel, David M. Segall, St. Louis, for Virginia Feinberg.
    Jerry A. Klein, Clayton, for Daniel Fein-berg.
    Richard A. Wunderlich, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Virginia Feinberg appeals from the granting of summary judgment in favor of Lindell Trust Company in the amount of $149,752.83. We affirm.

An extended opinion would serve no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).