Case ID: ala-app_27/html/0630-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "RICE, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

164 So. 915
    Elmer, alias Slim, DICKEY v. STATE.
    8 Div. 149.
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    Dec. 17, 1935.
    Bradshaw & Barnett, of Florence, for appellant.
    A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for the State.
   RICE, Judge.

It is enough to say that the court has read the entire evidence in this case, sitting in banc.

We are of the opinion that it contravenes in no way our holdings in the cases of Dickey v. State, 22 Ala.App. 375, 115 So. 848, and Davis v. State (Ala.App.) 160 So. 266, to hold, as we do here, that the evidence amply supported the verdict returned and the judgment rendered thereon.

The said judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed. 
      
       26 Ala.App. 370.