Case ID: f-appx_522/html/0798-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge Alejandro ANAYA-MEDINA, a.k.a. Cokis, a.k.a. Alberto Zuniga-Ortiz, Martin Arreola-Romero a.k.a. Sergio Placensia, Defendants-Appellants.
    No. 12-12261
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    July 1, 2013.
    Michael V. Herskowitz, Garrett L. Bradford, Gary Scott Hulsey, Lawrence R. Sommerfeld, Lisa Wilson Tarvin, George Jeffrey Viscomi, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Sally Yates, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    E. Vaughn Dunnigan, E. Vaughn Dunni-gan, PC, Akil Kenneth Secret, The Secret Firm, PC, Amy Levin Weil, The Weil Firm, Atlanta, GA, Jorge Alejandro Ana-ya-Medina, D. Ray James Cf-Inmate Legal Mail, Folkston, GA, for Defendants-Appellants.
    Before WILSON, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

E. Vaughn Dunnigan, appointed counsel for Jorge Alejandro Anaya-Medina, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Anaya-Medina’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.