Case ID: ohio-st-3d_52/html/0088-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Application of Stineman.
    [Cite as In re Application of Stineman (1990), 52 Ohio St. 3d 88.]
    (No. 89-1979
    Submitted March 13, 1990
    Decided June 27, 1990.)
    
      
      Clark & Eyrich and Stephen T. MacConnell, for applicant.
    
      Michael M. Schmieg, for the Cincinnati Bar Association.
   Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and its recommendation. Accordingly, applicant’s application for admission without examination is hereby denied. However, applicant is permitted to reapply for admission. He shall undergo further character and fitness examination and, if approved, be required to take the Ohio bar examination.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Stephenson, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Earl E. Stephenson, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting for Wright, J.