Case ID: f-appx_188/html/0616-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Tsering TSOMO, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 04-73586.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted June 15, 2006.
    Decided July 3, 2006.
    Jagdip Singh Sekhon, Esq., Sekhon & Sekhon, PLC, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.
    Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, James E. Grimes, Esq., Melissa Neiman-Kelting, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Lit., Marie K. McElderry, Esq., Mark L. Gross, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before: GOODWIN, O’SCANNLAIN, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

The court sua sponte vacates the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision and remands the petition for review for an actual finding of the nationality of the petitioner. The petitioner’s testimony was unworthy of belief, but in declaring it impossible to decide nationality, the IJ disregarded documentary and other evidence tending to show that in all probability she was, in fact, a refugee from Tibet. After making a finding of nationality, the Board should proceed to a decision on the merits of her claim. VACATED and REMANDED. It is so ordered. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.