Case ID: f-appx_186/html/0481-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Felicia ROBERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 04-41208.
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Decided June 21, 2006.
    Traci Lynne Kenner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Eastern District of Texas, Tyler, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.
    Amy R. Blalock, Wayne R. Dickey, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Eastern District of Texas, Tyler, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Felicia Roberson appeals from a guilty-plea conviction for possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute and for aiding and abetting in the offense. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); 18 U.S.C. § 2.

For the first time on appeal, Roberson argues that the district court erred in imposing a sentence under a mandatory guideline scheme, in violation of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). We review for plain error. See United States v. Valenzuelar-Quevedo, 407 F.3d 728, 732 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 267, 163 L.Ed.2d 240 (2005). Roberson has not shown that the district court would have sentenced her differently under an advisory sentencing scheme. Accordingly, Roberson has failed to show that the district court’s imposition of a sentence under a mandatory guideline scheme was plain error. See id. at 733-34.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.