Case ID: sw3d_567/html/0696-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Keith Neil ESTES, Appellant.
    No. ED 106333
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    Filed: February 13, 2019
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Katherine P. Curry, 1000 West Nifong Blvd., Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203.
    ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Eric Schmitt, Attorney General, Julia E. Rives, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.
    Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Keith Estes appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for felony possession of heroin and misdemeanor possession of paraphernalia with intent to use. There was no error in the exclusion of evidence, nor in the prosecutor's closing argument. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).