Case ID: f-appx_313/html/0646-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. David BOYNTON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-8322.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 19, 2009.
    Decided: Feb. 26, 2009.
    Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Amy Leigh Austin, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Richard Daniel Cooke, Norval George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Boynton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Boynton, No. 3:97-cr-00294-JRS-1 (E.D.Va. Oct. 14, 2008). See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.