Case ID: or_245/html/0239-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued November 3,
    dismissed December 21, 1966
    MARTIN v. VAN HOOMISSEN et al
    421 P. 2d 369
    
      William C. Martin, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Dusenbery, Martin, Beatty, Parks & Templeton, John C. Beatty, Jr., and Frederick T. Smith, Portland.
    
      Willis A. West, Chief Civil Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, Portland.
    Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and Perry, Sloan, O’Connell, Goodwin, Denecke and Holman, Justices.
   PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court for Multnomah county which approved the ballot title for an initiative measure to repeal the Multnomah County Home Rule Charter. This is the same initiative measure involved in our decision in Stuart v. Weldon, 245 Or 203, 421 P2d 367 (1966). That decision makes this case moot and the case is, therefore, dismissed.