Case ID: f-appx_82/html/0309-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles JONES, a/k/a Nicholas Warner Jones, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CHAIRPERSON OF THE MARYLAND PAROLE BOARD; Jane Doe, Parole Hearing Commissioner/John Doe; M.M. Williams, Parole Hearing Commissioner, Mr.; William W. Sondervan, Mr. Dr.; Patricia Phelps Schupple, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 03-7369.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 19, 2003.
    Decided Dec. 5, 2003.
    Charles Jones, Appellant pro se. David Phelps Kennedy, Joseph A. Curran, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM.

Charles Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Chairperson of the Md. Parole Bd., No. CA-03-615-1-RDB (D. Md. filed July 25, 2003; entered July 28, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED