Case ID: nys_121/html/1140-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MITCHELL, Respondent, v. O’GORMAN, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    March 18, 1910.)
    Action by Grace W. Mitchell against William J. O’Gorman.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

THOMAS, J., dissents, u^on the ground that plaintiff’s counsel persisted in asking questions known to him to be improper, and thereby making suggestions that were prejudicial to the defendant.