Case ID: f-appx_396/html/0468-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Leoncio REYES-RIVAS, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 09-71624.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.
    
    Filed Sept. 24, 2010.
    Leoncio Reyes-Rivas, Panorama City, CA, pro se.
    Ari Nazarov, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Ronald E..Le-fevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
    Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Leoncio Reyes-Rivas, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for voluntary departure as a matter of discretion. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that Reyes-Rivas did not merit voluntary departure as a matter of discretion. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(f) (“No court shall have jurisdiction over an appeal from denial of a request for an order of voluntary departure”); Gomez-Lopez v. Ashcroft, 393 F.3d 882, 884 (9th Cir.2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.