Case ID: so2d_492/html/1074-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Alejandro MENDIOLA, Respondent.
    No. 68172.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Aug. 28, 1986.
    
      Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Randi Klay-man Lazarus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for petitioner.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and N. Joseph Durant, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We review Mendiola v. State, 490 So.2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), to answer a certified question of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We previously answered the certified question affirmatively in State v. Cross, 487 So.2d 1056 (Fla.1986). We approve the decision below.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARRETT, JJ., concur. . 
      
      
        Mendiola, at 76:
      Under the 1983 Amendments to Article I, Section 12 of the Florida Constitution, does the exclusionary rule apply in probation revocation hearings?