Case ID: nys_147/html/1147-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

VICTORIA SAND CO., Appellant, v. EMPIRE LIMESTONE CO., Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    May 20, 1914.)
    Action by the Victoria Sand Company against the Empire Limestone Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed with costs. Held: (1) That the damages awarded upon the plaintiff’s second cause of action are not shown to be inadequate, even if the jurjr found the contract to be as therein alleged ; it appearing that there was an available market for the undelivered sand, and no proof that as much could not be realized therefor in the market as the contract price. (2) That a sufficient consideration was shown to support the contract set forth in the defendant’s counterclaim.