Case ID: so2d_606/html/1286-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marie Rose BUCKLAND and Robert Buckland, her husband, Appellants, v. CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE and St. Lucie County, Appellees.
    No. 91-2370.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Nov. 12, 1992.
    Eric J. Bruning, Goldman, Bruning & Angelos, P.A., Port St. Lucie, for appellants.
    
      Lyman H. Reynolds, Jr. and Leigh E. Lassiter, Roberts & Reynolds, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We find no error in the trial court’s holding that a municipality could not be held legally responsible for any impairment to a driver’s view of a stop sign caused by the glare of the setting sun. See Payne v. Broward County, 461 So.2d 63 (Fla.1984).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.