Case ID: sw3d_499/html/0382-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Earnest HOLT, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 103985
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE.
    FILED: September 27, 2016
    Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, -Atty. Gen., Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before Philip M. Hess, C.J., Lawrence E, Mooney, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

The movant, Earnest Holt, appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s judgment denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).