Case ID: f-appx_682/html/0687-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shawn La Velle ROLLINS, Defendant-Appellant. The Federal Public Defender for the Districts of Colorado and Wyoming, Amicus Curiae.
    No. 15-1459
    United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
    Filed March 27, 2017
    Robert Mark Russel, Karl L. Schock, Office of the United States Attorney, District of Colorado, Denver, CO, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Kyle W. Brenton, Shannon Wells Stevenson, Esq., Davis Graham & Stubbs, Denver, CO, for Defendant-Appellant
    Shawn La Velle Rollins, Pro Se
    Josh Lee, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Districts of Colorado and Wyoming, Denver, CO, for Amicus Curiae The Federal Public Defender for the Districts of Colorado and Wyoming
    Before BRISCOE, McKAY, and McHUGH, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER AND JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This matter comes on for consideration of the government’s Unopposed Motion for Summary Affirmance, in which the government moves for summary affirmance of the district court’s sentencing determination in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Beckles v. United States, — U.S. —, 137 S.Ct. 886, 197 L.Ed.2d 145, 2017 WL 855781 (March 6, 2017). Defendant Shawn La Velle Rollins does not oppose the motion.

Upon consideration thereof, the motion is granted. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

The mandate shall issue forthwith. 
      
       This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.