Case ID: mart-os_11/html/0205-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "roRTER, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MAGER vs. LOUISIANA INSURANCE COMPANY.
    East'n District.
    March, 1822.
    If testimony admitted,sworn to, and be contradictory, the supreme court will re-«maud the case for a new trial.
    Appeal from the court of the first district.
    
      Grymes for the plaintiff, Duncan for the defendant.
   roRTER, J.

delivered the opinion ot the rT,, . . ⅜, ' . , court, this case is similar in all its circufi-be stances to that of Barry vs. Louisiana Insurance Company just decided, it must therefore re- . ; ' , _ ceive a Similar judgment,

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the district court be annulled, avoided and reversed, that the cause be remanded for a new trial, and that the appellee pay the costs of this appeal.