Case ID: kan_69/html/0851-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

H. E. Walter v. William Logan et al.
    
    No. 13,592.
    (76 Pac. 1131.)
    Error from Cherokee, district court; A. H. Skidmore, judge.
    Opinion filed May 7, 1904.
    Reversed.
    
      W. B. Cowley, and A. 8. Dennison, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Forhner de Forhner, and Blue c& Hamilton, for defendants in error.
   Per Curiam:

The reply of H. E. Walter to the amended.' answer of Oliver P. and S. F. Hill was sufficiently verified ■ to deny any appointment or authority alleged in the • answer. (Gibson v. Shorb, 7 Kan. App. 732, 52 Pac. 579.)

We have read the evidence in the case and do not find that, in legal effect, it differs materially from the evidence ■ introduced on the former trial, which was held insufficient to support a judgment for defendants below. (Walter v. Logan, 63 Kan. 193, 65 Pac. 225.)

The judgment will be reversed and a new trial granted.