Case ID: ga-app_29/html/0282-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodwortii, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

13953.
    Mallard v. The State.
    Decided December 12, 1922.
    Indictment for larceny of hog; from Miller superior court — Judge Worrill. September 2, 1922.
    W. I. Geer, for plaintiff in error.
    
      B. T. Qastellow, solicitor-general, R. R. Arnold, E. C. Hill, contra.
   Bloodwortii, J.

1. Under the particular facts of this case, and in the absence of a proper and timely written request for more specific instructions, the charge as given is correct and sufficiently full, and the judge did not err in failing to charge as complained of in the three special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

2. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Lulce, J., concur.