Case ID: ga_114/html/0543-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Little, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas v. The State.
    Submitted January 21,
    Decided February 4, 1902.
   Little, J.

No evidence appears in the record which is sufficient to establish a legal conclusion that the plaintiff in error was guilty of the offense with which he was charged. Therefore a new trial should have been granted.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Indictment for fornication. Before Judge Janes. Haralson superior court. December 19, 1901.

W. R. Hutcheson and 2?. S. <& E. E. Griffith, for plaintiff in error.

W. T. Roberts, solicitor-general, contra.