Case ID: fla_152/html/0276-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RACHEL T. BEATY, et al., v. INLET BEACH, INC., a corporation
    10 So. (2nd) 807
    June Term, 1942
    January 8, 1943
    En Banc
    
      Miller & Fitzsimmons, McCune, Hiaasen <& Fleming, for appellants.
    
      E. F. P. Brigham, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM:

On reconsideration of petition to recall mandate and reconsider our opinion filed herein on September 29, 1942, we delete from our opinion the sentence, viz: “The Hollywood Development and Harbor Co. accepted the over-payment of $32.25 at the mortgage foreclosure sale, and is estopped to claim it was not properly served in the foreclosure proceedings.” The deletion does not affect our judgment and the motion to recall mandate is denied.

So ordered.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

TERRELL and ADAMS, JJ., dissent.