Case ID: kan_67/html/0866-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John W. Blank v. The Thilmany Pulp and Paper Company.
    No. 13,313.
    (74 Pac. 1131.)
    Error from Lyon district court; Dennis Madden, judge.
    Opinion filed November 7, 1903.
    Affirmed.
    
      J. Harvey Frith, for plaintiff in error.
    
      McCarty da Hutchison, for defendant in error.
   Per Curiam:

The questions raised and determined in the court below were questions of fact. We must assume that it was found from the evidence that Heagler & Co. did not assume the Bay debt. This was one of the issues in the case. The existence of fraud was also found by the court, and we cannot disturb such finding; there was some evidence to support it.

The judgment will be affirmed.