Case ID: sw3d_471/html/0403-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael COFFMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 101802
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Filed: October 6, 2015
    Andrew E. Zleit, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 68101, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Mary H. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.
    Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Michael Coffman appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2) & (5).