Case ID: so2d_598/html/0285-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Willie Lee BEDFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 91-01463.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    May 13, 1992.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and John S. Lynch, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
    
      Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The appellant appeals his revocation of probation and resulting ten year prison sentence. We find no merit in the appellant’s claim that the trial court was without jurisdiction to revoke probation and thus affirm as to the revocation.

On revocation of probation, the trial court in sentencing the appellant departed upward more than one cell based on the appellant’s having had multiple violations of probation. Subsequently, the Florida Supreme Court held that multiple violations of probation are not a proper reason for a guidelines departure. Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 284 (Fla.1992). Williams also held, however, that “where there are multiple violations of probation, the sentence may be successively bumped to one higher cell for each violation.” Therefore, the sentence in this case is set aside and the cause remanded for resentencing consistent with Williams. See also O’Keefe v. State, 595 So.2d 291 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and BLUE, JJ., concur.