Case ID: vt_105/html/0352-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Moulton, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harry Brammall v. Louis LaRose.
    February Term, 1933.
    Present: Powers, C. J., Slack, Moulton, Thompson, and Graham, JJ.
    Opinion filed May 2, 1933.
    
      Clayton H. Kinney for the defendant.
    
      
      F. G. Hinchey and Fenton, Wing, Morse & Jeffords for the plaintiff.
   Moulton, J.

The facts in this case are the same as those in the ease of Annie Brammall v. Louis LaRose, ante page 345, and the decision is the same for the reasons therein given.

Judgment affirmed, and cause remanded.