Case ID: f-appx_187/html/0312-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Claude WILSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. J. JENKINS, Sergeant Deputy Sheriff; T. Stephens, Deputy; Phayme, Sergeant Deputy; McGauge, Deputy; Richmond City Sheriff Office, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 06-6307.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted June 22, 2006.
    Decided June 30, 2006.
    
      Claude Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Claude Wilson appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint because he failed to return the “consent to collection of fees” form, as ordered by the court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wilson v. Jenkins, No. 3:05-cv-00874-JRS (E.D.Va. Feb. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED 
      
       The dismissal was without prejudice to Wilson’s right to refile his action.