Case ID: me_153/html/0115-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sylvester M. McNally and Dorothy C. McNally vs. Fred M. Patterson and Lillian M. Patterson
    Penobscot.
    Opinion, October 11, 1957.
    
      John H. Needham, for the plaintiff.
    
      Oscar Walker, for the defendant.
    Sitting: Williamson, C. J., Webber, Beliveau, Tapley, Sullivan, Dubord, JJ.
   Per curiam.

This is an action upon a writ of entry. The plaintiff received a verdict with a special finding establishing the disputed property line and an award of damages. The case is before us upon the stereotyped motion for a new trial.

There was substantial, credible evidence to support the verdict in all respects. A discussion of the evidence would be futile. The jury entertained and answered authoritatively a typical, jury question with finality. A careful examination of the record discloses no error of law or of fact in the verdict, which requires correction. McCully v. Bessey, 142 Me. 209, 212.

Motion denied.