Case ID: njl_111/html/0241-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WILLIAM PALANSKY, APPELLANT, v. MAX REICH ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Argued May 24, 1933
    Decided September 27, 1933.
    Eor the appellant, Walter V. Schwartz.
    
    Eor the respondents, Ghandless, Weller «§ Selser.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Supreme Court, and printed in 11 N. J. Mis. R. 106.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchabd, Parker, Case, Hehee, Perskie, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — -None.