Case ID: ga_95/html/0500-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cantrell v. The State.
    Bleckley, C. J. — Beading the whole charge of the court together, it conforms substantially to the rule touching the establisment of an alibi and the doctrine of reasonable doubt, set forth .in Harrison v. The State, 83 Qa. 129; and there was no error in denying a new trial.
    October 8, 1894.
    Indictment for robbery. Before Judge Clark. Fulton superior court. March, term, 1894.
    F. R. "Walker, for plaintiff in error.
    C. D. Hill, solicitor-general, contra.
    
   Judgment affirmed,.