Case ID: ohio-st-3d_69/html/0475-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n     F.E. Sweeney, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 475.]
    (No. 94-490
    Submitted April 19, 1994
    Decided June 22, 1994.)
    
      
      Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
    
      Koblentz & Koblentz, Richard S. Koblentz and Peter A Russell, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. Accordingly, Robert Smith III is hereby suspended from the practice of law for two years, and he is to be credited for the time he has served under our order of April 7, 1993. Additionally, respondent is not to be reinstated to the practice of law prior to the termination of his federal probation. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

F.E. Sweeney, J.,

dissents and would indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law.