Case ID: ohio-st-3d_104/html/0654-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Lundberg Stratton, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Gill et al.
    [Cite as In re Gill, 104 Ohio St.3d 654, 2004-Ohio-6895.]
    (No. 2003-2017
    Submitted December 14, 2004
    Decided December 22, 2004.)
   {¶ 1} The certified question of state law is answered in the affirmative on the authority of In re Nowak, 104 Ohio St.3d 466, 2004-Ohio-6777, 820 N.E.2d 335.

McFadden & Associates Co., L.P.A., and David A. Freeburg, for petitioner, ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc.

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease L.L.P., and Lisa Pierce Reisz, for respondent, Frederick L. Ransier III, trustee.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 2} I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in In re Nowak, 104 Ohio St.3d 466, 2004-Ohio-6777, 820 N.E.2d 335.

O’Donnell, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.