Case ID: f-appx_261/html/0530-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lincoln Monroe BROCK, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-7266.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 17, 2008.
    Decided: Jan. 24, 2008.
    Lincoln Monroe Brock, Appellant Pro Se. Randall Stuart Galyon, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Lincoln Monroe Brock appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Crim. Pro. 33 motion for a new trial predicated on newly discovered evidence. We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Brock’s motion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brock, No. 1:03-cr-00429-JAB (M.D.N.C., Aug. 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED