Case ID: pa_624/html/0616-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

87 A.3d 316
    COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Gregorio TORO, III, Petitioner.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    March 12, 2014.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue is:

Whether Superior Court erred because it affirmed the PCRA court but for different reasons; namely, that the [petition was untimely and this determination was made sua sponte by the Superior Court but is erroneous because the issues being adjudicated were raised in a timely PCRA but subsequent PCRA’s [sic] were filed for procedural defects of the Common Pleas Court or abandonment by prior PCRA counsel?