Case ID: so2d_623/html/0291-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. INGRAM, Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Phillip LUCY and Margaret Lucy v. The HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY.
    1910217.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    June 25, 1993.
    John A. Owens of Phelps, Owens, Jenkins, Gibson & Fowler, Tuscaloosa, for appellants.
    No brief for appellee.
   ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

APPLICATION OVERRULED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES, ADAMS and KENNEDY, JJ., concur.

STEAGALL and INGRAM, JJ., dissent.

INGRAM, Justice

(dissenting).

I dissent from the overruling of the appellants’ application for rehearing. I would grant the rehearing.

It appears to me that the trial was flawed by the admission of illegal and prejudicial evidence that appears to have influenced the jury’s verdict.

STEAGALL, J., concurs.