Case ID: misc_35/html/0791-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Max Fischer, Respondent, v. Joseph Conhaim et al., Appellants.
    Appeal from an affirmance by the General Term of the City Court of the city of Hew York, of a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff at a Trial Term of said court.
    H. V. Rutherford, for appellants.
    J. Wilkenfeld, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The nonpayment of the bonus, was by the contract of employment, made dependent upon an exercise by the defendants of their reserved right to discharge the plaintiff within the year. He was not discharged, but served the full term, without any expression of dissatisfaction. He was, therefore, entitled to the extra compensation.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.