Case ID: misc_31/html/0759-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harry Hirshman, Appellant, v. Morris Shidlovshy, Respondent.
    Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the defendant, upon a trial had without a jury.
    Carl L. Schurz, for appellant
    Eurzman & Frankenheimer (Nathan Ottinger, of counsel), for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The only question, involved upon the appeal is one of fact. Upon the evidence the justice could have found either way, and having decided in favor of the defendant, we discover no reason for disturbing his conclusion.

Present: Beekmah, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gormas, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.