Case ID: f-appx_427/html/0867-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roger GAMBREL, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-16235
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    June 1, 2011.
    R. Brian Tanner, Savannah, GA, James C. Stuchell, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Savannah, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Roger Gambrel, Butner, NC, pro se.
    Before BARKETT, MARCUS and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Jacque D. Hawk, retained counsel for Roger Gambrel in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Gambrel’s pro se motion for the appointment of substitute counsel, remand, or access to the record is DENIED, and Gambrel’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.