Case ID: minn_293/html/0415-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE v. DALE RICHARD OLSON.
    196 N. W. 2d 444.
    March 31, 1972
    No. 42774.
    
      C. Paul Jones, State Public Defender, and Rosalie E. Wahl, Assistant State Public Defender, for appellant.
    
      Warren Spannaus, Attorney General, Curtis Forslund, Solicitor General, and Richard G. Mark, Special Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
    Heard before Murphy, Peterson, Kelly, and Mason, JJ.
   Per Curiam.

Defendant, who was charged with kidnapping, theft, and simple robbery, pleaded guilty to simple robbery. He appeals from that conviction, asserting for the first time on this appeal that he should be permitted to withdraw his plea of guilty on the ground that the prosecution failed to fulfill its part of an alleged plea bargain with respect to the sentence imposed. Although we might infer from the proceedings that there was some form of plea bargain, the record does not disclose the terms of the agreement. We are accordingly unable to decide the question without the kind of record which an evidentiary hearing in a postconviction proceeding would establish. State v. Coe, 290 Minn. 537, 188 N. W. 2d 421 (1971).

Affirmed.