Case ID: ohio-st-3d_98/html/1508-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

2003-0116.
    Goodlett v. Ohio Cas. Group.
   Butler App. No. CA2002-04-090. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Entry Granting Motion to Certify Conflict filed January 10, 2003:

“Where both a person and a corporation are named insureds in a commercial automobile liability policy, is there still ambiguity in the word ‘you’ as found by the Ohio Supreme Court in Scott-Pontzer v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 85 Ohio St.3d 660,1999-Ohio-292, with regard to the definition of Vho is an insured?’ ”

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2003-0038, Goodlett v. Ohio Cas. Group, Butler App. No. CA2002-04-090.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.