Case ID: nj-super_264/html/0010-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

623 A.2d 1384
    JOYCE CARR, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ARTHUR W. BURGESS, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF H. THOMAS CARR, BARBARA CARR, MICHAEL T. CARR, KATHLEEN P. CARR AND TIMOTHY F. CARR, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND BERLY INVESTMENT CO.; LESLIE GRABOWSKI, JEFFREY KIRSCH, ROBERT ELKINS, RAYMOND BUCK AND AQUAMARINE DEVELOPMENT, INC., INTERVENORS.
    Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
    Argued March 16, 1993
    Decided April 5, 1993.
    Before Judges MICHELS, BIDDER and WALLACE.
    
      Noel S. Tonneman argued the cause for appellants (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys; Warren W. Wilentz, of counsel; Mr. Tonneman, on the brief).
    
      John A. 'Craner argued the cause for respondent (Craner, Nelson, Satkin & Scheer, attorneys; Mr. Craner, on the brief).
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Epstein in his opinion reported at 264 N.J.Super. 191, 623 A.2d 1384 (Ch.Div.1993). We are satisfied that the findings of fact are supported by substantial credible evidence in the record and find no sound reason or justification to interfere with them. See Rova Farms Resort v. Investors Ins. Co., 65 N.J. 474, 484, 323 A.2d 495 (1974).