Case ID: ohio-st_174/html/0420-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The Pennsylvania Rd. Co., Appellant, v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Appellee.
    
      (No. 37648
    Decided April 24, 1963.)
    
      Messrs. Bricher, Evatt, Barton, EcJcler é Niehoff, Mr. Robert H. Bierma and Mr. Cornelius P. Callahan, Jr., for appellant.
    
      Mr. William B. Saxbe, attorney general, Mr. Andrew R. Sarishy and Mr. Jay C. Flowers, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

It is the contention of appellant that the order of the commission is unreasonable and should be reversed.

The record contains conflicting evidence supporting the contentions of both parties. Ordinarily, this court will not substitute its judgment on questions of fact for that of the commission; It does not appear from an examination of the record that the order of the commission is against the manifest weight of the evidence or is otherwise unlawful or unreasonable. The order is, therefore, affirmed.

Order affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Sherer, JJ., concur.

Sherer, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Gibson, J.