Case ID: okla_121/html/0295-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CITY OF TULSA v. WOOD.
    No. 17267
    Opinion Filed Oct. 19, 1926.
    Appeal from District Court, Mayes County ; Fred A. Speakman, Assigned Judge.
    Action between the City of Tulsa and Elizabeth J. Wood. From the judgment, the former brings error.
    Reversed and remanded.
    H. O. Bland, Harry Halley, W. B. Robin son, and Langley & Langley, for plaintiff in error.
    R. A. Wilkorson and F. F. Brewster, for defendant in error.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon authority of Ellis v. Outler, 25 Okla. 489, 106 Pac. 957, this cause is reversed and remanded for a new trial for failure of the defendants in error to file a brief as required by rule 7 of this court.