Case ID: ad3d_26/html/0190-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edward Murphy, Plaintiff, v City of New York et al., Defendants, and Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Respondent. Samruve Operating Corp. et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v Yellowstone Industries, Inc., ThirdParty Defendant-Appellant.
    [807 NYS2d 873]
   Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered October 5, 2005, which denied the motion of third-party defendant-appellant Yellowstone Industries for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Issues of fact as to whether the defect in the roadway was caused in some measure by Yellowstone Industries, which performed excavation work at or near the accident site, mandated the denial of Yellowstone’s summary judgment motion (see Murphy v City of New York, 216 AD2d 110 [1995]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Marlow, Sweeny, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.