Case ID: ny-st-rep_56/html/0884-09.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of One Hundred and Twenty-Seventh Street. In the Matter of James A. Deering.
    
      George G. Hunger, for app’lt; Hem'y A. Powell, for resp’t.
   Per Curiam.

The record upon which this appeal is heard shows beyond dispute that the relation of attorney and client between Deering and James Baird never existed ; and as that relation is the necessary foundation for an attorney’s lien, it follows that the attorney .has no lien upon the fund. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.