Case ID: ny-2d_56/html/0690-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of New York State Teachers’ Retirement System, Respondent, v Robert Z. Srogi, as Commissioner of Assessment of the City of Syracuse, et al., Appellants.
    Decided May 6, 1982
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      David M. Garber, Corporation Counsel (Eleanor Theodore of counsel), for appellants.
    
      Harry L. Du Brin, Jr., and Karl E. Nisoff for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (84 AD2d 912).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.