Case ID: ohio-st-3d_67/html/0443-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State ex rel. Baker, Appellant, v. Schiemann, Appellee.
    [Cite as State ex rel. Baker v. Schiemann (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 443.]
    (No. 93-908
    Submitted July 28, 1993
    Decided October 13, 1993.)
    
      
      Saul P. Baker, M.D., pro se.
    
    
      Jeffrey J. Schiemann, pro se.
    
   Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. The trial court has ordered the relief appellant seeks. If he is dissatisfied, he may appeal. Mandamus is not a substitute for appeal. State ex rel. Pressley v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St.2d 141, 40 O.O.2d 141, 228 N.E.2d 631, paragraph three of the syllabus.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.