Case ID: sw3d_159/html/0451-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William FEDERER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Richard A. GEPHARDT, et al., Defendants/Respodents.
    No. ED 84697.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Feb. 1, 2005.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 23, 2005.
    Application for Transfer Denied April 26, 2005.
    Bradley S. Dede, Clayton, MO, and Paul J. Orfanedes, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
    Elizabeth C. Carver, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Federer (“Federer”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his petition. Federer contends that the causes of action in his petition were timely filed within the respective statute of limitation for each cause and that his petition stated claims upon which relief could be granted.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).