Case ID: nj_38/html/0300-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GIUSEPPE DE NARDIS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. STEVENS CONSTRUCTION CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
    Argued September 11, 1962
    Decided September 24, 1962.
    
      Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Thomas E. Weinstoclc argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Bendit & Weinstock, attorneys).
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Sullivan in the Appellate Division.

Mr. Justice Hall and Mr. Justice Haneman vote to reverse the judgment for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion of Judge Price.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintbaub, and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Peoctoe and Sci-iettino — 5.

For reversal — Justices Hall and PIaneman — 2.