Case ID: sw3d_165/html/0166-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard KUNKEL, Appellant, v. ANHEUSER BUSCH, INC., et al., Respondents.
    No. ED 83633.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Nov. 2, 2004.
    Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 5, 2005.
    Case Transferred to Supreme Court March 1, 2005.
    Case Retransferred to Court of Appeals May 31, 2005.
    Original Opinion Reinstated June 20, 2005.
    Thomas B. Hayes, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Carmody MacDonald, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Kunkel (“Kunkel”) appeals from the order of the trial court granting the motion of defendants Anheuser-Busch, Inc. and Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. (collectively “Anheuser-Busch”) for summary judgment on Kunkel’s claim of wrongful discharge.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).