Case ID: f-appx_604/html/0286-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jeffrey COHEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rod ROSENSTEIN, U.S. Attorney; Harry Gruber, Asst. U.S. Attorney; Joyce McDonald, Asst. U.S. Attorney, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 15-6193.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 19, 2015.
    Decided: May 22, 2015.
    Jeffrey Brian Cohen, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Brian Cohen appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil complaint against federal prosecutors as premature under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915, 1915A (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cohen v. Rosenstein, No. 1:15-cv-00263-WDQ (D.Md. Feb. 3, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED. 
      
      . We have jurisdiction because Cohen cannot cure the defect identified in his complaint by mere amendment. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993).
     
      
      
        . See Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641, 646, 117 S.Ct. 1584, 137 L.Ed.2d 906 (1997); Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994).