Case ID: nj-eq_111/html/0430-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nathan Welitoff, complainant-appellant, v. Fidelity Title and Mortgage Company et al., defendants-respondents.
    [Submitted May 27th, 1932.
    Decided October 17th, 1932.]
    
      Messrs. Melosh, Morion & Melosh, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. James 8. De Turclc, for the respondent.
   Pee Cueiam.

The decree under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the per curiam opinion of Vice-Chancellor Lewis ubi supra.

For affirmance — The Chanoelloe, Teenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Beogan, Van Buskiek, Kays, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.