Case ID: f-appx_122/html/0654-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James William BERRY, Sr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Thomas MCBRIDE, Warden, “Newly Appointed”; James Rubenstein, Commissioner of Corrections; Michael Coleman, Deputy Warden; Betty Slayton, Magistrate of M.O.C.C.; Carl Shellings, Unit Manager; William Kincaid, Unit Manager; Petrisha Hendshew, Postal Sup.; Brian Stump, Correctional Officer, Defendants—Appellees. and Correctional Medical Services, Defendant.
    No. 04-7654.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 24, 2005.
    Decided: March 7, 2005.
    James William Berry, Sr., Appellant pro se.
    Charles Patrick Houdyschell, Jr., West Virginia Division of Corrections, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

James William Berry, Sr., appeals from the district court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Berry v. McBride, No. CA-02-856 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED