Case ID: f-appx_84/html/0804-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Felix Claude MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-10419.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 8, 2003.
    
    Decided Dec. 15, 2003.
    Patrick Hanly, Esq., USSC-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    
      Felix Claude Martin, BSS-Behavioral Systems Southwest, Riverside, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before GOODWIN, WALLACE and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Felix Claude Martin appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Because we cannot review the district court’s discretionary decision not to modify Martin’s sentence pursuant to § 3582(c)(2), we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See United States v. Lowe, 136 F.3d 1231, 1233 (9th Cir.1998).

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.