Case ID: f-appx_194/html/0105-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kathleen R. KIRBY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. RICHMOND REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY, Section 8; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 05-2292.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 26, 2006.
    Decided: Aug. 15, 2006.
    Kathleen R. Kirby, Appellant Pro Se. Kristen Marie Calleja, Alexander Jones Brackett, Sr., MeGuirewoods, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Robert P. McIntosh, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Kathleen R. Kirby appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her claims pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kirby v. Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority, No. CA-04-791-REP-MHL (E.D.Va. Sep. 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.