Case ID: f-appx_456/html/0836-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique RICO-VIDAL, a.k.a. Enrique Vidall, a.k.a. Luis Javier Marrero, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 11-11040
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Feb. 1, 2012.
    Robert G. Davies, David L. Goldberg, Pamela C. Marsh, U.S. Attorneys Office, Pensacola, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Thomas S. Keith, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Pensacola, FL, Gwendolyn L. Spivey, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, Randolph P. Mur-rell, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Gainesville, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Enrique Rico-Vidal, Jonesville, VA, pro se.
    Before DUB IN A, Chief Judge, MARCUS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Enrique Rico-Vidal in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rico-Vidal’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.