Case ID: sw2d_825/html/0071-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gregory BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 59930.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    March 10, 1992.
    David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Rudolph R. Rhodes, IV, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Gregory Brown, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, the transcript and the legal file and find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. In addition, we find that the motion court did not err in denying appellant’s Rule 24.035 motion. Appellant’s appeal of the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion is, therefore, affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.