Case ID: f-appx_78/html/0365-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Youa Lor YANG, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-10312.
    Conference Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Oct. 21, 2003.
    
      Delonia Anita Watson, US Attorney’s Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Steven Jay Rozan, Kuniansky & Rozan, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Youa Lor Yang (‘Yang”) appeals his guilty-plea conviction for importing opium into the United States. For the first time on appeal, Yang argues that his counsel was ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress, not arguing in support of his motion for downward departure at sentencing, and not arguing that the Government should have filed a motion for downward departure based upon his substantial assistance.

Because Yang did not raise his claims in the district court, there is no evidentiary record on these issues. Consequently, the record has not been developed sufficiently for us to consider Yang’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims on direct appeal. See United States v. Maria-Martinez, 143 F.3d 914, 916 (5th Cir.1998). Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is AFFIRMED without prejudice to Yang’s right to raise his ineffective assistance of counsel claims in a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We express no view on the merits of such a motion. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.