Case ID: so2d_573/html/0446-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frank SPRADLING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 90-01102.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Feb. 1, 1991.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
    Robert A.' Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Erica M. Raffel, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence in this case. However, we strike the provision in the judgment which assesses a public defender fee against appellant, because the record indicates these costs were imposed without prior notice or the opportunity to be heard. Our decision is without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition of the fee after adequate notice to appellant.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.