Case ID: ad3d_130/html/0609-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Pearl Turner, Respondent, v Pierre Turner, Appellant.
    [10 NYS3d 891]
   Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Hope Schwartz Zimmerman, J.), dated November 25, 2013. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the plaintiff’s motion for an award of an attorney’s fee to the extent of awarding her the sum of $10,000.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in awarding the plaintiff an attorney’s fee in the sum of $10,000. In reaching this determination, the court properly considered the relative financial circumstances of the parties, the relative merit of their positions, and the fact that the defendant’s attorney prolonged the litigation by failing to appear at the scheduled attorney’s fee hearing (see Formica v Formica, 101 AD3d 805, 807 [2012]; Morales v Inzerra, 98 AD3d 484, 485 [2012]; Ventimiglia v Ventimiglia, 36 AD3d 899 [2007]; cf. Baron v Baron, 71 AD3d 807, 810-811 [2010]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are not properly before this Court. Mastro, J.P., Chambers, Maltese and Duffy, JJ., concur.