Case ID: sw2d_951/html/0763-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Joseph W. BARKO, Appellant.
    No. WD 52924.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Sept. 30, 1997.
    Robert G. Duncan, Kansas City, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David R. Truman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before SMART, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Joseph Barko appeals his judgment of conviction for burglary in the second degree in violation of Section 569.170, RSMo 1994, claiming that there was insufficient evidence to establish that a crime was committed or to find that he participated in that crime. We disagree. Finding no prece-dential value to our decision, we affirm by this summary order but have provided the parties with a memorandum setting out the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).