Case ID: nj-eq_75/html/0293-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Florence Boyle, by next friend, complainant-respondent, v. John Boyle, defendant-appellant.
    [Argued November 20th, 1908.
    Decided March 1st, 1909.]
    On appeal from a decree of the former chancellor advised by Vice-Chancellor Howell, whose opinion is reported in '67 Atl. Rep. 690.
    
    
      Mr. Spaulding Frazer (with whom were Messrs. Riher •& RzTcer), for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Thomas S. Henry, for the respondent.
   Pee Curiam.

The decree under review herein will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Howell.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Vooriiees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dill—15.

For reversal—None.