Case ID: f-appx_6/html/0563-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Daniel J. WHITT, Appellant.
    No. 00-2723WM.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted May 24, 2001.
    Decided June 5, 2001.
    Before LOKEN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

After a hearing, the District Court found that Daniel J. Whitt had violated the conditions of his supervised release, revoked it, and sentenced him to six months imprisonment and one year supervised release. Whitt appeals.

We have reviewed the district court record and appellant’s brief. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the District Court. When the District Court imposed sentence on revocation of supervised release, the punishment selected was less than the statutory maximum, less than the three years of supervised release originally received by the defendant, and at the lower range of the term suggested by the Guidelines, U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4(a). Violations that Whitt admitted (testing positive for marijuana), standing alone, were sufficient to support the Court’s action.

Affirmed. 
      
      . The Hon. Dean Whipple, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.