Case ID: or_292/html/0784-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      TANZER, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted March 4,
    reversed April 6, 1982
    McIntyre, Respondent on Review, v. WRIGHT, Defendant, and STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND CORPORATION, Petitioner on Review.
    
    (CA 19231, SC 28239)
    643 P2d 338
    Darrell E. Bewley, Appellate Counsel, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the brief were K. R. Maloney, General Counsel, and James A. Blevins, Chief Trial Counsel, Salem.
    Stanton F. Long, Deputy Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the brief were David B. Frohnmayer, Attorney General, William F. Gary, Solicitor General, and Al J. Laue, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.
    Before Denecke, C.J., and Lent, Linde, Peterson, Tanzer and Campbell, JJ.
    TANZER, J.
    
      
       Linde, J., did not participate in this decision.
    
   TANZER, J.

This is a post-decree garnishment proceeding in a dissolution suit. The trial court allowed a continuing garnishment against defendant’s workers’ compensation benefits in the hands of the insurer. The Court of Appeals modified.

The issues in this case are identical to those presented in the case of Satterfield v. Satterfield, 292 Or 780, 643 P2d 336 (1982) (decided this date). Our decision in this case is based upon the reasons expressed in our opinion in Satterfield.

The Court of Appeals allowance of the garnishment is reversed.