Case ID: ad3d_95/html/1237-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Erik Johnson, Appellant.
    [943 NYS2d 910] —
   Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lasak, J.), rendered March 25, 2010, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was convicted, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree. The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction. We affirm.

“[E]ven if the Supreme Court erred in denying the defendant’s request for a missing witness charge, any error was harmless, as there was overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt and no significant probability that the error contributed to his conviction” (People v Smalls, 81 AD3d 669, 670 [2011]; see People v Chardon, 83 AD3d 954, 955 [2011]; compare People v Brown, 75 AD3d 515, 516 [2010]). For the same reason, any error in admitting certain hearsay testimony of third parties as to what the victim and one of the witnesses said was harmless (see People v Harvey, 270 AD2d 959, 960 [2000]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Angiolillo, J.P, Lott, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.