Case ID: so2d_596/html/1099-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sandra RUBIN, f/k/a Sandra Cohen, Appellant, v. NEW SUNRISE INVESTMENT CORP., Herman Cohen, and Charlotte Vogel, Appellees.
    Nos. 90-2197, 90-2198 and 90-2895.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 3, 1992.
    As Modified on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc May 12, 1992.
    Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik and Leonard H. Rubin, Miami, for appellant.
    Shalle Stephen Fine; Bedzow Korn Kan & Glaser and Allan M. Glaser, Miami, for appellees New Sunrise Inv. Corp'., and Herman Cohen.
    Karen A. Gievers, Miami, for appellee Charlotte Vogel.
    Before HUBBART, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Hynd v. Ireland, 582 So.2d 772 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Steigman v. Danese, 502 So.2d 463 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 511 So.2d 998 (Fla.1987); Tullo v. Horner, 296 So.2d 502 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); § 95.031(2).