Case ID: so2d_487/html/1028-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BOWEN, Presiding Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Curtis ANDERSON v. STATE.
    3 Div. 299.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    April 8, 1986.
    Jeffery C. Duffey, of Duffey & Wallace, Montgomery, for appellant.
    Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Robert B. Rinehart, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
   BOWEN, Presiding Judge.

The record reflects, and the Attorney General admits, that the revocation of the appellant’s probation was in violation of Armstrong v. State, 294 Ala. 100, 312 So.2d 620 (1975). Consequently, the judgment of the circuit court is reversed and this cause is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All Judges concur.