Case ID: f-appx_692/html/0325-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mark BOWERS Plaintiff-Appellant v. David A. MULLEN, MD, ERDCC; John Williams, MD, MECC; Karl Hardman, RN BN Health Service Administrator Defendants T. Bredeman, Medical Director of Corizon Defendant-Appellee
    No. 16-3926
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 28, 2017
    Filed: July 6, 2017
    Mark Bowers, Pro Se
    Jessica L. Liss, Amy J. White, Jackson & Lewis, Saint Louis, MO, for Defendants
    Before LOKEN, ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Former Missouri prisoner Mark Bowers appeals following the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action claiming deliberate indifference to his medical needs. After de novo review, see Beaulieu v. Ludeman, 690 F.3d 1017, 1024 (8th Cir. 2012), we affirm. Specifically, we find that neither the denial of a requested orthopedic evaluation, nor the delay in reviewing a subsequent request for evaluation, constituted deliberate indifference to Bowers’s serious medical needs. See Holden v. Hirner, 663 F.3d 336, 342 (8th Cir. 2011); Meuir v. Greene Cty. Jail Emps., 487 F.3d 1115, 1118-19 (8th Cir. 2007) (physicians are free to exercise independent medical judgment); Vaughan v. Lacey, 49 F.3d 1344, 1346 (8th Cir. 1995) (mere disagreement, even between physicians, over proper course of treatment is not actionable under Eighth Amendment).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable John A. Ross, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.