Case ID: so2d_733/html/0590-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jose ALONSO, Nilda Alonso, and Michael Alonso, Appellants, v. AMERICAN VEHICLE INSURANCE CO., Appellee.
    No. 98-1656.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 2, 1999.
    Lidsky & Vacearo and Charles L. Vacea-ro, for appellants.
    Freud & Abraham and Michael J. Schwartz, for appellee.
    Before NESBITT, JORGENSON, and LEVY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

In view of the fact that the record reflects the existence of disputed issues of material fact relating to (1) whether the second Endorsement Binder purportedly received by the appellee was a forgery or was genuine, if such a document even existed in the first place, and (2) whether Insurance Depot was the agent of the appellant or the appellee, the trial court was in error in granting the appellee’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

Accordingly, the Summary Judgment entered in favor of the appellee is reversed and this cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent herewith.