Case ID: so2d_471/html/1377-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James David WALSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 84-62.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    July 10, 1985.
    James David Walsh, pro se.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Margaret Good, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carolyn V. McCann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. We have considered each of the issues raised by appellant and find no reversible error. In particular, we find no error in the trial court’s withholding of adjudication and sentence on Count II since the offense charged in Count II was a lesser included offense of Count I and appellant could not properly be adjudicated and sentenced under both counts. See Bell v. State, 437 So.2d 1057 (Fla.1983). We construe the court’s order withholding adjudication as simply giving effect to this rule.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and HURLEY, JJ., concur.