Case ID: so2d_677/html/0070-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David SANDERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 94-3576, 94-3582.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    July 15, 1996.
    David Sanders, pro se.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Terry Carley, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Amelia L. Beisner, Assistant Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on consolidated appeal from Sanders’ convictions for possession of cocaine (lower ease no. 94-969) and possession of cocaine and paraphernalia (lower case no. 94-902). We affirm without comment the trial court’s adjudications of guilt in both cases.

However, as for Sanders’ sentences, we remand with directions that the trial court conform the written sentencing documents to its oral pronouncements (or lack thereof) at the sentencing hearing. Specifically, we direct the trial court to:

1. Conform the written sentencing documents to its oral pronouncement that all of Sanders’ sentences would run concurrently, and that he would receive credit for time served, Taylor v. State, 425 So.2d 1191, 1194 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983);
2. Allow Sanders notice and an opportunity to be heard on the amount of his public defender fee, Kirby v. State, 658 So.2d 1232 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); and
3. Strike Sanders’ special conditions of probation that were not specifically pronounced at sentencing (i.e., conditions 11,12 and 15). State v. Hart, 668 So.2d 589 (Fla.1996).

JUDGMENTS AFFIRMED; SENTENCES REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

BOOTH, WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur. 
      
      . Per Sanders' motion, the trial court addressed sentencing in both cases in a single consolidated sentencing hearing.