Case ID: so2d_338/html/0259-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ORLANDO CENTRAL PARK, INC., Appellant, v. MASTER DOOR COMPANY OF ORLANDO, INC., a Florida Corporation, and Brody Construction, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellees.
    Nos. 75-2141 and 76-108.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Oct. 15, 1976.
    Patricia C. Fawsett and George T. Eid-son, Jr., Akerman, Senterfitt, Eidson & Wharton, Orlando, for appellant.
    Charles J. Collins, Jr., Steed & Collins, Orlando, for appellee-Master Door Co. of Orlando, Inc.
   PER CURIAM.

We consolidate for the purpose of review and disposition interlocutory appeals cases 75-2141 and 76-108.

Upon review of the record on appeal and briefs of the respective parties, we determine that the trial court erred in failing to grant appellant-defendant’s motion to dismiss appellee-plaintiff’s second amended complaint for it fails to state a cause of action sufficient to establish an equitable lien, or for the equity remedy of reformation. Accordingly, the order appealed in Case No. 75-2141 is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to dismiss appellee-plaintiff’s second amended complaint with prejudice. Case No. 76 — 108 is dismissed as rendered moot by the disposition of Case No. 75-2141.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

MAGER, C. J., and CROSS and DOW-NEY, JJ., concur.