Case ID: so2d_587/html/1322-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Matthew KENNY, Respondent.
    No. 77611.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Nov. 7, 1991.
    
      Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and David R. Gemmer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for petitioner.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Robert D. Rosen, Asst. Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review State v. Kenny, 576 So.2d 302 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), based on express and direct conflict with Carter v. State, 571 So.2d 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), and Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We recently quashed Flowers and Carter and approved cases that reached the same result as the court below. Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla.1991); Carter v. State, 586 So.2d 340 (Fla.1991); State v. Worley, 586 So.2d 338 (Fla.1991). Accordingly, the opinion below is approved. We disapprove the opinion in Walker.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, barkett, grimes, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.