Case ID: sw3d_216/html/0260-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Troy L. FENTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 66554.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    March 13, 2007.
    Andrew A. Schroeder, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before: ULRICH, P.J., LOWENSTEIN and SMART, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Troy Fenton appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Fenton was found guilty after a jury trial of one count of escape from confinement, Section 575.210. Fenton alleged that he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel failed to object to a State’s question during voir dire. This court has reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and finds no error of law. A written opinion reciting the facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).