Case ID: f-supp_77/html/0937-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HOWELL, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph H. BEUTTAS et al. v. UNITED STATES (two cases).
    Nos. 47867, 47868.
    Court of Claims.
    June 1, 1948.
    P. J. J. Nicolaides, of Washington, D. C. (William F. Kelly, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for plaintiffs.
    Francis X. Daly, of Boston, Mass., and Herbert A. Bergson, Acting Ass’t. Atty. Gen., for defendant.
    Before JONES, Chief Justice, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER, and MADDEN, Judge.
   HOWELL, Judge.

The facts and circumstances in these two cases are identical with those in the case of Beuttas v. United States, Ct.CL, 77 F. Supp. 933, with the exception of the date of execution of the contracts, the location of the particular projects, and the amount of additional costs sought to be recovered.

What we have said with reference to the above case applies equally to these two cases and accordingly, the defendant’s demurrer in each case is overruled.

It is so ordered.