Case ID: ad2d_23/html/0656-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William Squillante et al., Appellants, v. Los Cab Corp. et al., Respondents.
   Judgment in favor of defendants unanimously reversed, on the law, and a new trial ordered, with $50 costs to appellants. After plaintiffs rested in this personal injury action tried before a jury, defendants moved to dismiss the complaint for failure of a prima facie ease. When the motion w]as denied defendants rested and both sides moved for a directed verdict. The count then directed a verdict in favor of defendants on the ground that a verdict by the jury in favor of plaintiff would have had to be set aside as contrary to the weight of the evidence. By denying defendants’ motion to dismiss, the court recognized, in our opinion properly, that the evidence was sufficient to require submission of the issues to the jury. A prima facie ease had clearly been presented by plaintiffs. Direction of a verdict solely on weight of evidence grounds was therefore error (Davis v. Garisto Constr. Corp., 19 A D 2d 518), stemming, it would appear, from the mistaken view that a direction on such grounds is authorized where the motion for a directed verdict has been made by all parties (see CPLR 4401; McTiernan v. City of Little Falls, 284 App. Div. 79). Concur — Boitein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Steuer, JJ.