Case ID: f-appx_15/html/0386-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harry James SUTTON, Appellant, v. U.S. PROBATION OFFICE; Timothy M. Scharr, U.S. Probation Officer; Kathleen M. Hawk, Director of Bureau, Appellees.
    No. 00-3830.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted July 26, 2001.
    Decided Aug. 1, 2001.
    Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Harry James Sutton appeals the district court’s 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal of his action" under the Privacy Act, in which he alleged that his presentence report contained “inaccurate” information. This appeal is frivolous, and therefore we dismiss it. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). 
      
      . The HONORABLE STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.