Case ID: ohio-st-3d_88/html/0154-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Akron Bar Association v. Bojonell.
    [Cite as Akron Bar Assn. v. Bojonell (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 154.]
    (No. 99-1616
    Submitted October 20, 1999
    Decided February 23, 2000.)
    
      
      Michael A. Saltzer, for relator.
    
      James M. Campbell, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

As we have previously held in a matter very similar to this, representing others by advising them of their rights and communicating on their behalf to adverse parties about settlements of causes of action constitutes the practice of law. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Cromwell (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 255, 695 N.E.2d 243.

Respondent is hereby enjoined from engaging in any further activities that might constitute the unauthorized practice of law. Cost are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.