Case ID: f-appx_73/html/0633-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adolfo VALDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-6495.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 28, 2003.
    Decided Sept. 4, 2003.
    Adolfo Valdez, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM:

Adolfo Valdez seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis filed under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. A writ of error coram nobis is available only when the petitioner is not in custody. See, e.g., United States v. Sawyer, 239 F.3d 31, 37 (1st Cir.2001). Because Valdez is in federal custody and has filed a prior motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), he may not circumvent the gatekeeping provisions of § 2255 H 8 and 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000), by filing a petition under § 1651. United States v. Noske, 235 F.3d 405, 406 (8th Cir.2000). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.