Case ID: so2d_571/html/0401-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "McMILLAN, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronald R. GERBIGE v. STATE.
    8 Div. 429.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    Oct. 12, 1990.
    Cecil M. Matthews, Guntersville, for appellant.
    Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and Sandra Lewis, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
   AFTER REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

McMILLAN, Judge.

Pursuant to Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255 (1989), we hold that the appellant’s claim that the State failed to produce sufficient evidence to sustain his conviction of receiving stolen property in the first degree is precluded under Temp. Rule 20.2(a)(3) and (5), A.R.Cr.P. Appellant’s claim that his appellate counsel was ineffective because of a failure to file a brief on direct appeal is without merit, Ex parte Dunn, 514 So.2d 1300 (Ala.1987), because the appellant consented to his attorney’s not filing a brief.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.