Case ID: dc_1/html/0341-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Cranch, C. J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas v. Woodhouse.
    The defendant may, at the trial-court, give notice to anon-resident plaintiff, that security for costs will be required, and the cause will be continued if the plaintiff is not ready to give the security.
    
      Mr. Swann and Mr. E. J. Lee, for the plaintiff.
    
      Mr. Taylor and Mr. Hiort, for the defendant.
   The Court continued this cause to enable the defendant to give notice, (according to law of Virginia, P. P. Ill,) that security for costs will be required.

Cranch, C. J.,

contra, thought that the law did not intend that the plaintiff should be defeated of his trial, unless sixty days’ notice had already been given.