Case ID: so2d_844/html/0663-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Inalvis CASERO, Appellant, v. Edith B. MARTINEZ, Appellee.
    No. 3D02-1271.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 19, 2003.
    Rehearing Denied May 14, 2003.
    Joseph F. Lopez, Coral Gables, for appellant.
    Hinshaw & Culbertson and Gina E. Caruso and Nickolas C. Berry, for appellee.
    Before COPE, GERSTEN and WELLS, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The summary judgment is affirmed on authority of Spector v. Ahrenholz, 107 So.2d 34, 36 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958); see also Mills v. Mills, 112 So.2d 298 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959); Rappaport v. Kalstein, 156 Fla. 722, 24 So.2d 301 (1946). It is our view that the trial court correctly applied the principles described in those decisions to the case now before us.

Affirmed.