Case ID: ad_250/html/0828-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michele Mangione, Respondent, v. General Railway Signal Company, Appellant.
   On reargument, order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Chippona v. General Railway Signal Co., 249 App. Div. 255.) All concur. (The order grants plaintiff discovery and inspection of defendant’s plant in an action for personal injuries sustained by contracting silicosis.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ. [See 248 App. Div. 847; 249 id. 921.]