Case ID: ga_116/html/0617-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Fish, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rawis et al. v. The State.
    Argued November 17,
    Decided December 9, 1902.
    Indictment for burglary. Before Judge Fite. Gordon superior court. October 13, 1902.
    
      Cantrell & Bamsaur, for plamtiff in error.
    
      Sam. P. Maddox, solicitor-general, contra.
   Fish, J.

The jury being the judges of the credibility of witnesses, and the testi mony upon which the State relied, if credible, being sufficient to authorize a conviction, and the trial judge being satisfied with the verdict, the Supreme Court will not interfere with the discretion exercised by him in overruling a motion for a new trial, based solely upon the general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.