Case ID: nj_1/html/0356-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ANNA LOTT, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM LOTT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Argued January 17, 1949
    Decided January 24, 1949.
    
      Mr. S. Sidney Silver argued the cause for the petitioner-appellant.
    
      Mr. Charles M. Grosman argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Robert D. and Charles M. Grosman, attorneys).
   Per Curiam.

We concur in the conclusion reached in the court below that the appellant failed to prove and corroborate the allegations of her petition. The decree is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance: Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Case, Heher, Wacheneeld, Burling, and Ackerson—6.

For reversal: None.