Case ID: pa_383/html/0536-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Arnold,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lancaster City Annexation Case.
    Argued November 30, 1955.
    Before Stearns, Jones, Bell, Musmanno and Arnold, JJ.
    
      William B. Arnold, for appellant.
    
      January 3, 1956:
    
      John B. Bengier, Assistant City Solicitor, with him Bernard M. Zimmerman, City Solicitor, Louis 8. Mag, W. O. Johnstone, Jr. and Brown & Zimmerman, for appellees.
   Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

These annexation proceedings have to do with the annexation of land, in which appellants claim that there was no physical contiguity of the annexed land at the time of enactment of the ordinance.

This appeal is dismissed on the authority of Lancaster City Annexation Case (No. 4), 374 Pa. 543, 98 A. 2d 33, in which the same question was decided adversely to the appellants.

The order of the court below is affirmed; costs to be paid by the appellant.