Case ID: njl_103/html/0507-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROBERT STURLA ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT.
    Submitted October 29, 1926
    Decided January 31, 1927.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N. J. Mis. R. 287.
    For the respondents, Stokes & McDermott.
    
    For the appellant, William A. Barkalow.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.