Case ID: nys_149/html/1094-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. INGRAHAM, P. J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LYNCH, Respondent, v. MURPHY, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    November 6, 1914.)
    Action by Margaret A. Lynch against Anna Murphy. R. Victor, of New York City, for appellant. B. E. Messler, of New York City, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

D~termination (81 Misc. Rep. 180, 142 N. Y. Supp. 373) affirmed, with costs. Order filed. -

INGRAHAM, P. J.,

dissents, on the ground that the contract sued on was not in writing and was void under the statute of frauds. See, also, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1127.