Case ID: so2d_256/html/0240-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rudolph ROBINSON, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 71-793.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Jan. 11, 1972.
    Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Alen S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Barry J. Clyman, Legal Intern, for appellee.
    Before SWANN, C. J., CHARLES CARROLL, J., and LESTER M. IGNATIUS, Associate Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

On this appeal by the defendant below following his conviction for robbery, the appellant’s contentions that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress certain evidence (a gun) on the claim that it was the product of an unlawful search, and in denying his motion for continuance made during the trial, have been considered in the light of the record and briefs, and are held to be without merit. No reversible error having been made to appear, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.