Case ID: thomp-cook_5/html/0695-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Barnard, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Burling v. Freeman.
    
      Jurisdiction — of county court—when objection to must be taken.
    
    In an action in a county court the complaint was silent as to the residence of defendants, bur they appeared and answered, and made no objection to the jurisdiction of the court. Held, that it was too late after judgment to take the objection that the court had not jurisdiction, because it did not appear in the record that defendants were residents of the county.
    Appeal by defendants from an order of the Kings county court denying a motion to set aside a judgment in favor of plaintiff.
    The judgment had been rendered in an action for the possession of personal property, brought by Mary Burling against Luke Freeman and others.
    
      Anthony Barrett, for appellants.
    
      T. O. Connor, for respondent.
   Barnard, P. J.

The only question passed upon in the opinion is fully set forth in the head-note.

Order affirmed.