Case ID: cust-ct_36/html/0491-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Oliver, Chief Judge:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(V. D. 22)
    Paramount Import & Export Co. v. United States
    Entry No. 787879.
    (Decided February 8, 1956)
    
      Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Edward N. Clad of counsel) for the plaintiff.
    
      Warren E. Burger, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
   Oliver, Chief Judge:

This is a proceeding which arose by reason of a judgment rendered by the first division of this court in the case of Paramount Import & Export Co. et al. v. United States, 33 Cust. Ct. 409, Abstract 58473. By that judgment, under the terms of the statute (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)), the matters were remanded to a single judge to "determine the proper dutiable value of the merchandise.” The proceeding before me, insofar as protest 211069-K is concerned, has been abandoned by counsel for the plaintiff. It is therefore dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.