Case ID: nys_66/html/1136-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LEVY et al., Respondents, v. HARLEM, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    November 7, 1900.)
    Action by Julius Levy and others against Edward Harlem. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Joseph Rosenzweig, for appellant. Hayes & Bitterman, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

The only conclusion which the evidence warrants as to compensation is that the plaintiffs were to receive $50. The witness Silverman alone testified as to the amount of the commissions, and he said that the plaintiffs were to get $50. There was no evidence which conflicts with his statement. As to jurisdiction, see Worthington v. Accident Co. (N. Y. App.) 58 N. E. 102. The judgment is therefore modified by reducing it $100, and, as modified, is affirmed, without costs.