Case ID: f-appx_194/html/0884-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael WARD, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-16988
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Sept. 11, 2006.
    Anne R. Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Kathleen M. Williams, Richard C. Klugh, Jr., Michael T. Caruso, Federal Public Defender, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before BLACK, BARKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Richard C. Klugh, Jr., appointed counsel for Michael Ward in this appeal from Ward’s revocation of supervised release, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ward’s revocation and sentence are AFFIRMED.