Case ID: ny-super-ct_54/html/0555-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Opinion Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

National Bank of Virginia, Respondent, v. Robert A. Mills, et. al., Appellants.
    Decided December 30, 1886.
    Appeal from judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from two orders denying defendants’ motion for a new trial. Aaron J. Vanderpoel, for appellants. Edward P. Wilder, for respondent.
   Opinion Per Curiam.

Before Sedgwick, J., Van Vorst and Freedman, JJ. Judgment and order denying defendants’ motion for new trial on the minutes affirmed, with costs. Order denying defendants’ motion for new trial on the ground of surprise and newly discovered evidence affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.