Case ID: nj_171/html/0334-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

793 A.2d 714
    RUDOLPH LAIDLOW AND JEAN LAIDLOW, PLAINTIFFS, v. HARITON MACHINERY COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND RICHARD PORTMAN AND ADVANCED METALLURGY AMI-DDC INC., A DIVISION OF TECHNITROL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
    February 25, 2002.
   ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on an appeal as of right pursuant to Rule 2:2-1(a)(1), and the Court having determined that the matter does not present a substantial constitutional question within the meaning of the Rule or applicable caselaw;

It is ORDERED that the within appeal is dismissed.