Case ID: ind_23/html/0100-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Parish v. Lane.
    APPEAL from the Dearborn Common Pleas.
    
      D. 8. Major, for appellant.
    
      McDonald $ Roadie, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

No question is made in this case, except as the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. The evidence, however, can not be regarded as in the record, the 30th rule not being complied with. Hamilton v. Johnson, 20 Ind. 392.

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.