Case ID: so2d_451/html/0893-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sidney LEVY, Appellant, v. Lynn D. LEVY, Appellee.
    Nos. 83-925, 84-37.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 29, 1984.
    Rehearing Denied July 3, 1984.
    Trenam, Simmons, Kemker, Scharf, Bar-kin, Frye & O’Neil and Dale F. Webner, Miami, for appellant.
    Sams, Ward, Newman, Beckham & El-ser, and Frank D. Newman, Miami, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The interpretation of a contract is a matter within the purview of the trial court. That interpretation will not be reversed on appeal unless it is clearly incorrect and unsupported by the evidence. Murphy v. Murphy, 370 So.2d 403 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 383 So.2d 1199 (Fla.1980). The record in this case supports the trial court’s interpretation of the agreement. Accordingly, we affirm.

Affirmed.