Case ID: sw3d_351/html/0247-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Donald GIAMMANCO, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 95513.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Oct. 25, 2011.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, Richard A. Starnes, Jefferson City, MO, for Plaintiff/Respondent.
    Rosalind Koch, Columbia, MO, for Defendant/Appellant.
    Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald Giammanco appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of seven counts of first-degree robbery. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court committed no plain error. Rule 30.20; State v. Washington, 260 S.W.3d 875, 879 (Mo.App. E.D.2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). 
      
      . All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.