Case ID: njl_105/html/0488-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HAROLD L. DECKER, APPELLANT, v. AUGUSTUS NASH, RECORDER, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENT.
    Argued October 24, 1928
    Decided February 4, 1929.
    For the appellant, Earl A. Merrill.
    
    For the respondent, Paul Q. Oliver.
    
   Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chiee Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.