Case ID: n-mar-i_5/html/0124-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

American Construction, Inc., and American International Knitters Corporation, Petitioners/Appellees, v. Epifania Salgado, Department of Labor And Immigration, Thomas O. Sablan, Linn H. Asper, Commonwealth Health Center, and Office of The Attorney General, Respondents/Appellants.
    Appeal No. 96-051
    Civil Action No. 95-1043
    November 20, 1997
    Submitted on the briefs July 21, 1997
    Counsel for Appellant: Robert B. Dunlap, Office of Attorney General, Saipan. Celeste E. Andersen, Department of Public Health Saipan.
    Counsel for Appellee: Steven P. Pixley, Saipan.
    BEFORE: TAYLOR, Chief Justice, VILLAGOMEZ and ATALIG, Justices.
   PER CURIAM:

The appellants appeal the Superior Court’s order dated December 2, 1996, granting the appellee’s request for a declaratory ruling that they are not liable for medical expenses incurred by Epifania Salgado during his hospitalization at the Commonwealth Health Center. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to title 1, § 3102(a) of the Commonwealth Code. We affirm.

DISCUSSION

We review a trial court’s review of agency action de novo. Camacho v. Northern Marianas Retirement Fund, 1 N.M.I. 362, 366 (1990).

i We adopt the factual findings and reasoning of the Superior Court which held:

1. When an employee’s contract for employment has expired but that employee has filed a complaint with the Chief of Labor, there does not need to be a Labor Department hearing before that employee can be deemed to have been terminated;
2. An employer is responsible for medical coverage of a nonresident worker for up to 96 days after the date the employment contract has expired when that employee files a complaint with the Chief of Labor for alleged labor violations; and
3. An employer does not have an affirmative duty to advance a labor complaint such that a failure to do so constitutes a waiver of the employer’s rights to have a Labor Department hearing within the thirty day period under 3 CMC § 4447(b).

CONCLUSION

" For the reasons set forth above, we hereby AFFIRM Superior Court’s order dated December 2, 1996.