Case ID: f_268/html/1022-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PARKER et al. v. THOMAS.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
    October 14, 1920.)
    No. 2805.
    In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois. Action between Ulysses S. Thomas and Matthew K. Parker and others. Judgment for the former, and the latter bring error.
    Affirmed.
    Edward O. Brown and Rupert Barry, both of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff in error. Edwin H. Cassels, of Chicago, Ill., for defendant in error.
    Before BAKER, ALSCHULER, and PAGE, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment is attacked upon the ground that the record conclusively shows the indorsement by plaintiffs in error of the note in question to have been for the accommodation of defendant in error. The proofs (all appearing by stipulation) afford evidence of the ultimate fact that the indorsement was not for the accommodation of defendant in error, and therefore the judgment must be and is affirmed.