Case ID: f-appx_693/html/0226-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard POLIDI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR; John Does 1-5; Jane Does 1-5, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 17-1001
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 20, 2017
    Decided: July 24, 2017
    Richard Polidi, Appellant Pro Se.
    
      Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Polidi appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his civil complaint and denying his Motion for a New Hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Polidi v. North Carolina State Bar, No. 1:16-cv-01322-TSE-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 31, 2016; Nov. 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED