Case ID: ad3d_68/html/0475-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Christine Yuen, Respondent, v Edwin Yuen K. Wong et al., Appellants.
    [888 NYS2d 884]
   In opposition to plaintiffs showing that defendants executed the promissory note and defaulted in payment (see Alard, L.L.C. v Weiss, 1 AD3d 131 [2003]), defendants’ evidence was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact concerning any of the payments they claim should be credited against the note. Concur— Tom, J.P., Nardelli, Renwick, Freedman and Roman, JJ.