Case ID: f-appx_155/html/0317-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Aniceto VEGA-BEJAR, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 04-30125.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 5, 2005.
    
    Decided Dec. 12, 2005.
    Jack B. Haycock, Esq., USPO — Office of The U.S. Attorney, Pocatello, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Steven V. Richert, Federal Defenders of Eastern Washington and Idaho, Pocatello, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: GOODWIN, W. FLETCHER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Defendant Aniceto Vega-Bejar, Jr., appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We remand to the sentencing court to proceed pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1078 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 755-56, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.