Case ID: ohio-st-3d_91/html/1245-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Cook, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bernad, Appellee, v. City of Lakewood, Appellant.
    [Cite as Bernad v. Lakewood (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 1245.]
    (No. 00-1161
    Submitted March 14, 2001
    Decided April 25, 2001.)
    
      Randall C. Oliver, for appellee.
   The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Cook, J., dissents.

Cook, J.,

dissenting. I disagree with the majority’s decision to dismiss this cause as improvidently allowed. As Judge John T. Patton noted in his dissenting opinion, the rule adopted by the court of appeals could create problems in future replevin cases, for it “equates the [removal] of a disability with re-establishing an immediate right to possession or ownership of earlier confiscated property, * * * where such property has been legally confiscated.” The court of appeals’ decision to return the confiscated gun collection to Bernad might also conflict with R.C. 2933.41(C). That division provides, without qualification, that a person loses any right to possession of property that was the subject of an offense, the offense here being the undisputed possession by Bernad of the guns while under a disability.

Kevin M. Spellacy, Director of Law, and Jennifer L. Swallow, Assistant Law Director, for appellant.