Case ID: so2d_620/html/1233-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM. BARKETT, Chief Justice,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph INNES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 79902.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    June 24, 1993.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Allyn Giambalvo, Asst. Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Clearwater, for petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Peggy A. Quince and Stephen A. Baker, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Innes v. State, 597 So.2d 966 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), in which the district court asserted conflict with Lang v. State, 566 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We addressed the issue in this case in Sirmons v. State, 620 So.2d 1249 (Fla.1993). Accordingly, we quash the decision below and remand for proceedings consistent with Sirmons.

It is so ordered.

overton, McDonald, shaw, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

BARKETT, C.J., concurs specially with an opinion.

BARKETT, Chief Justice,

specially concurring.

I concur, but with the same reservations I expressed in Sirmons v. State, 620 So.2d 1249 (Fla.1993).