Case ID: pa-super_211/html/0125-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Ervin, P. J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Commonwealth v. Siderias, Appellant.
    Argued September 12, 1967.
    Before Ervin, P. J., Wright, Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, and Spaulding, JJ.
    
      November 16, 1967:
    
      Robert C. McFadden, with him William J. Morrissey, for appellant.
    
      Donald B. Corriere, Assistant District Attorney, with him Bernard V. O’Hare, Jr., District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
   Opinion by

Ervin, P. J.,

This case presents the identical questions raised in Com. v. Herb, 211 Pa. Superior Ct. 119, 235 A. 2d 429, which we have decided in an opinion filed concurrently herewith.

The only difference between the cases was that Herb was accused of “following too closely” while Siderias was charged with “unreasonable and improper speed.”

For the reasons set forth in Com. v. Herb, supra, the order of the court below is affirmed.