Case ID: okla_113/html/0186-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FREED v. BANK OF AURORA.
    No. 16669
    Opinion Filed Oct. 20, 1925.
    (Syllabus.)
    Appeal and Error — Case-Made—Extension of Time — Invalidity of Order.
    Where the trial judge makes an order extending the time to serve case-made after the expiration of the time before granted for such extension, the same is void.
    Note. — See under. (1) 4 C. J. p. 350, § 1991; 2 R. C. L. p. 158; 4 R. C. L. Supp. p. 86; 5 R. C. L. Supp. p. 75.
    Error from District Court, Tulsa County; A. C. Brewster, Judge.
    Action between the Bank of Aurora and Abe Freed, sole trader, doing- business in the name of Freed Furniture Company. From the judgment, the latter appeals.
    Dismissed.
    Rogers & Jones, for plaintiff in error.
    C. A. Steele and W. A. Daugherty, for defendant in error.
   PER CURIAM.

This case is appealed from the district court of Tulsa county, and defendant in error moves to dismiss on the ground that case-made was not served within the time provided by statute, nor within any valid extension of time. Judgment was rendered on the 7th day of February, 1925, and plaintiff in error gave notice of appeal and was allowed 30 days from date in which to serve case-made, which expired on the 9th day of March, 1925. On the 10th day of March, 1925, the time was extended 20 days, and after other extensions, case-made was finally served on the 6th day of August, 1925.

The order of March 10th is void and casgmade' is nullity, and this court without jurisdiction' to review the appeal. Hoggard v. Conservative Loan Company, 101 Okla. 14, 222 Pac. 674.

The appeal is dismissed.