Case ID: ohio-law-abs_4/html/0738-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 929
    ROMANOSKI v. HOFF
    No. 20045.
    Supreme Court
    On motion to certify.
    Dock. Aug. 4, 1926;
    4 Abs. 541.
    829. NEGLIGENCE — When child darts out in front of automobile without warning, and driver of same is driving carefully, can action be had for recovery for injury to child?
    Attorneys — F. S. Day for Romanoski; Dustin, McKeehan, Merrick, Arter & Stewart, for Hoff; all of Cleveland.
   The question concerns .the matter of whether one can recover when a person is driving an automobile, as an ordinarily prudent person would, and a child darts out in front of automobile without warning.