Case ID: f-appx_139/html/0842-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JBA INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellee, v. CELS ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendant-counter-claimant-Appellant, Geac Enterprise Solutions, Counter-defendant-Appellee.
    No. 03-57032.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 13, 2005.
    
    Decided July 15, 2005.
    Carlos Needham, Esq., Allan D. Johnson, Esq., O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Charles Bachman, Esq., O’Melveny & Myers LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee/Counter-Defendant-Appellee.
    Allan B. Cooper, Heather L. McCloskey, Esq., Ervin, Cohen & Jessup, LLP, Beverly Hills, CA, for Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant.
    Before: FARRIS, D.W. NELSON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   ORDER

We affirm for the well stated reasons in the District Court’s Order. We find no abuse of discretion. Entm’t Research Group v. Genesis Creative Group, Inc., 122 F.3d 1211, 1229 (9th Cir.1997).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.