Case ID: f2d_109/html/1015-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

H. W. FINDLEY, Defendant-Appellant, v. The F. D. CUMMER & SON COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee.
    No. 7208.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
    Jan. 3, 1940.
    Clarence B. Nixon, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.
    Elder W. Marshall, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.
    Before BIGGS, MARIS, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion of the district court, 30 F.Supp. 884, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial and upon the authority of Second National Bank of Reading v. Yeager, 268 Pa. 167, 111 A. 159; Speier v. Michelson, 303 Pa. 66, 154 A. 127, and Philadelphia Record Co. v. Sweet, 124 Pa.Super. 414, 188 A. 631, the judgment appealed from is affirmed..