Case ID: f-appx_564/html/0266-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jaime Lamon ESQUIVEL, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-3426.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 21, 2014.
    Filed: May 6, 2014.
    Bruce Gillan, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Lincoln, NE, Lyn-nett Wagner, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Omaha, NE, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Jaime Lamon Esquivel, Waymart, PA, pro se.
    Before BYE, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Jaime Esquivel appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for review of his sentence. After careful review, we conclude that the motion amounted to an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h) (authorization requirements); United States v. Lambros, 404 F.3d 1034, 1036 (8th Cir.2005) (per curiam) (inmates cannot bypass authorization requirement of § 2255 by purporting to invoke some other procedure). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.