Case ID: sw2d_282/html/0891-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "POPE, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James W. HILL, Appellant, v. CITY OF CASTLE HILLS, Texas, Appellee.
    No. 12803.
    Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.
    March 23, 1955.
    Rehearing Denied April 20, 1955.
    Harrison & Smallwood, Ronald Small-wood, San Antonio, for appellant.
    Bobbitt, Brite & Bobbitt, San Antonio, for appellee.
   POPE, Justice.

The trial court, after hearing, temporarily enjoined appellant from using certain property in Castle Hills for business purposes, since the property was zoned for residential uses only. Appellant urges .that the penal provision of the ordinance affords the sole instrument for enforcement, that, it is an adequate remedy, and the injunction should not have been granted.

The judgment is affirmed, since Article lOllh, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stats., authorizes the remedy by way of injunction. City of Corpus Christi v. Jones, Tex.Civ.App., 144 S.W.2d 388, 401.

Affirmed.