Case ID: cust-ct_2/html/0726-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Sullivan, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 41453.
    Protest 805703-G of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc. (Philadelphia).
   Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) uninflated rubber balls or so-called beach balls the same as those the subject of United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) at 30 percent under paragraph 1502; (2) wooden lacquered cabinets similar to those the subject of Abstract 37636 at 33⅝ percent under paragraph 412; and (3) microscope sets at 45 percent under paragraph 228 (b), United States v. Wolf (26 C. C. P. A. 243, C. A. D. 23) followed.