Case ID: f-appx_187/html/0914-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Miguel Porto-Carredo ESTUPINAN, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-16860
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    June 7, 2006.
    Luis Miguel Porto-Carredo Estupinan, Lisbon, OH, pro se.
    Yvette Rhodes Harrison, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Before CARNES, BARKETT and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Luis Miguel Porto-Carrero Estupinan, pro se, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582(c), and/or 3742(a). Because Estupinan’s sentence was final when he filed his motion, the district court correctly determined that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion.

AFFIRMED.