Case ID: ri_112/html/0363-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

310 A.2d 143.
    Sandra M. Hazen vs. Irwin M. Hazen.
    OCTOBER 18, 1973.
    Present: Roberts, C. J., Paolino, Joslin and Kelleher, JJ.
   Per Curiam.

We have issued certiorari to review a support order entered by a justice of the Family Court on July 13, 1972. Our action was prompted by the petitioner’s assertion that the total amount of the support order exceeds his weekly net take-home pay. The petitioner .is an officer and an employee of a family corporation which owns and operates a motel located in East Providence. '

In certiorari proceedings we do not weigh the evidence but merely examine the record to determine if there is any competent evidence which will support the court’s'findings. The petitioner testified that his.net take-home,weekly pay was $128.05. His wife, however, when asked, how much money her husband earned each, week, replied “over $300 a week.” The trial justice specifically found that petitioner’s testimony as it related to the amount of weekly income was unbelievable. -This finding will not be disturbed.

The petition -for certiorari is denied and dismissed-. The writ previously issued is quashed and the papers certified to iis are returned to the Family Court with our -decision endorsed thereon.' ' '

Kirshenbaum & Kirshenbaum, Alfred Factor, for plaintiff-respondent.

Marvin A. Brill, for defendant-petitioner.

Mr. Justice Doris did not participate.