Case ID: f3d_118/html/0972-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Application of Carl PHILIPS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEWELL CO., Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 2310, Docket 97-7559.
    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    Argued July 15, 1997.
    Decided July 30, 1997.
    Ronald J. Offenkrantz, New York City (Michael H. Smith, of counsel), for Petitioner-Appellant.
    Barry S. Alberts, New York City (Robert J. Hoskins, Paul Serudato, of counsel), for Respondent-Appellee.
    Before: WINTER, Chief Judge, JACOBS and LEVAL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from Judge Leisure’s denial of a petition to stay arbitration. We affirm for the reasons set forth in his opinion. Application of Carl Philips v. Newell Co., No. 96 CIV. 9153, 1997 WL 181191 (S.D.N.Y. April 15, 1997). The cont entions raised by the appellant for the first time on appeal are without merit.