Case ID: sw2d_11/html/0505-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HARVEY, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FIRST NAT. BANK OF LONGVIEW, TEXAS, et al. v. STATE BANKING BOARD et al.
    (No. 1003-4876.)
    Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section A.
    Dec. 12, 1928.
    Young & Stinchcomb, of Longview, for re-lators.
    . Claude Pollard, 'Atty. Gen., C. W. Truehart, Asst. Atty. Gen., and John W. Goodwm and L.' C. Sutton, both of Austin, for respondents.
   HARVEY, P. J.

The Supreme Court has this day adopted the opinion of Section B of the Commission, in the case of Edwin Lacy et al. v. State Banking Board, 11 S.W. (2d) 496. The holding's in that opinion require the same disposition of this case that 'is made of that case.

We reco&mend that the mandamus sought herein be refused.

GREENWOOD and PIERSON, JJ. Opinion of the Commission of Appeals adopted, and mandamus refused.