Case ID: nys_86/html/1134-11.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ERHARDT, Respondent, v. POTTIER & STYMUS CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    January 7, 1904.)
    Action by William Erhardt against the Pettier & Stymus Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, without costs. The case is distinguishable from Loretz v. Metropolitan St. R. Co., 34 App. Div. 1, 53 N. Y. Supp. 1059, by reason of the fact that here the venue appears to have been laid by the plaintiff in Kings county by mistake, and it appears from the statement of counsel upon the argument that there was an understanding on the hearing that the plaintiff should be regarded as having moved to correct this mistake.