Case ID: so2d_576/html/1374-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ralph RIVERA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 90-1848.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    April 4, 1991.
    
      James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Lyle Hitchens, Asst. Public Defender, Day-tona Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Judy Taylor Rush, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

We affirm on authority of Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) and certify the same question we certified in Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990):

DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?

DAUKSCH, COBB and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.