Case ID: f-appx_382/html/0333-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In Re: Bennie A. MACK, Jr., Petitioner.
    No. 09-2198.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 26, 2010.
    Decided: June 11, 2010.
    Bennie A. Mack, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
   Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bennie A. Mack, Jr. petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting in his civil action. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the court has now adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissed Mack’s action without prejudice to him filing a new complaint correcting the defects cited in the recommendation. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.