Case ID: f3d_170/html/1157-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael W. SCHLEEPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PURINA BENEFITS ASSOCIATION, a trust, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 98-3127.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted March 11, 1999.
    Decided March 24, 1999.
    
      Before: RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

In this ERISA case, the issue is whether the employee-beneficiary failed to exhaust his administrative remedies by not filing a timely intra-plan appeal. The District Court held the claim barred by failure to exhaust. We affirm.

Plaintiff argues exhaustion would have been futile. But no evidence to support this claim was adduced, and we are unwilling to assume futility. Plaintiff points out that he had already obtained one level of intra-plan review, and that his failure, if any, related only to a second level of intra-plan review. The law does not forbid an intra-plan appellate structure containing two levels.

Affirmed. 
      
      . The Hon. Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Court for the Eastern and Western Districts of Missouri.