Case ID: njl_102/html/0432-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JULIUS BIELECKI, APPELLANT, v. MAX HERTZ LEATHER COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
    Submitted October 29, 1925
    Decided February 1, 1926.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N. J. Mis. R. 375.
    For the appellant, Jacob L. Newman.
    
    For the respondent, Joseph C. Paul.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Rone.