Case ID: f-appx_72/html/0709-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cyrus N. PLUSH, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 02-36034. D.C. No. CV-02-05280-FDB.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted Aug. 11, 2003.
    
    Decided Aug. 19, 2003.
    Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, HAWKINS and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Cyrus N. Plush, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging defendants denied him access to courts. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

A timely filed notice of appeal is both mandatory and jurisdictional. See Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corrs., 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978). The procedures set forth in Fed. R.App. P. 4 are strictly construed, and there is no exception for prisoners proceeding pro se. Malone v. Avenenti, 850 F.2d 569, 572 (9th Cir.1988). The district court entered judgment in this case on September 4, 2002, and Plush filed a “Request for Certificate of Appealability,” which we construe as a notice of appeal, more than 30 days later, on October 16, 2002. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1). Because this notice of appeal is untimely, see id,., we dismiss the appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction, see Malone, 850 F.2d at 572.

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.