Case ID: conn-app_17/html/0813-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Town of East Hartford v. Ruth E. Cook
    (6412)
    Spallone, Daly and Foti, Js.
    Argued November 9
    decision released December 5, 1988
    
      Ruth E. Cook, pro se, the appellant (defendant).
    
      David J. Wenc, assistant corporation counsel, with whom, on the brief, was Jose R. Ramirez, assistant corporation counsel, for the appellee (plaintiff).
   Per Curiam.

The defendant has attacked the factual findings and the legal conclusions of the trial court. Our review of the record indicates no basis to support her averments of error. Practice Book § 4061.

There is no error.