Case ID: f-appx_144/html/0362-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mark Anthony BELL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Mr. BROOKS, Warden; John Doe, Institutional Doctor; Ms. Appante, Hospital Administrator, Defendants—Appellees, and Ms. Apontay, Medical Administrator, Defendant.
    No. 05-6524.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 29, 2005.
    Decided: Oct. 6, 2005.
    Mark Anthony Bell, Appellant Pro Se. Anita Claire Snyder, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    
      Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Mark Anthony Bell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Bivens complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bell v. Brooks, No. CA-03-938-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 14, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED 
      
      
        Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).