Case ID: ohio-st-3d_100/html/1262-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shramek.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Shramek, 100 Ohio St.3d 1262, 2003-Ohio-6805.]
    (No. 2002-2180
    Submitted December 2, 2003
    Decided December 4, 2003.)
   {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, William Jeffrey Shramek, Attorney Registration No. 0059936, last known address in Amherst, New York.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of April 16, 2003, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year with six months stayed on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that respondent be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier cases, see In re Report of the Comm, on Continuing Legal Edn. (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 1437, 761 N.E.2d 627; and Disciplinary Counsel v. Shramek, 98 Ohio St.3d 441, 2003-Ohio-1636, 786 N.E.2d 869.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.