Case ID: f-appx_312/html/0589-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Annis Recardo LLOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Connie JORDAN; Judge J. Hockenbury; Judge Lanier; Roddey Brown, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 08-8377.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 19, 2009.
    Decided: Feb. 27, 2009.
    
      Annis Recardo Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Annis Recardo Lloyd appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Lloyd v. Jordan, No. 5:08-ct-03119-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.