Case ID: or-app_45/html/0069-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted February 13,
    affirmed in part; reversed in part March 10,
    reconsideration denied April 17,
    petition for review denied May 1, 1980 (289 Or 71)
    In the Matter of the Marriage of GRIFFIN, Respondent, and GRIFFIN, Appellant.
    
    (No. 79-88-E-3, CA 15370)
    606 P2d 1186
    Cecil H. Quesseth, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Quesseth & Donaldson, Salem.
    Phil M. Kelley, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Laurence L. Janke & Associates, Portland.
    Before Joseph, Presiding Judge, Richardson, Judge, and Schwab, C.J.
    
    PER CURIAM
    
      
      Schwab, C.J., vice Lee, J., deceased.
    
   PER CURIAM

In this dissolution proceeding the wife challenges the award of custody of the minor children to the husband and a provision in the decree holding her in contempt of a previous order relating to temporary custody of the children. The award of custody to the husband is affirmed. The paragraph relating to the purported contempt is stricken, for the reason that the statutes concerning proceedings for enforcement of an order or decree pertaining to custody of minor children were not complied with. ORS 33.010(1)(e); ORS 33.040; ORS 23.020. In all other respects the decree is affirmed.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; no costs to either party.