Case ID: tex-crim_99/html/0583-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "LATTIMORE, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Paz Barron v. The State.
    No. 8802.
    Delivered April 1, 1925.
    Manufacturing Intoxicating Liquor — Evidence Held Sufficient.
    No bills of exceptions appearing in the record, and the facts being sufficient to sustain the judgment the cause is affirmed.
    Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County. Tried below before the Hon. C. A. Pippin, Judge.
    Appeal from a conviction for manufacturing intoxicating liquor; penalty, two years in the penitentiary.
    No brief filed for appellant.
    
      Tom Garrard, State’s Attorney, and Grover C. Morris, Assistant State’s Attorney, for the State.
   LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas county of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a single bill of exceptions. The State’s evidence sufficiently shows the commission of the offense. Appellant defended on the proposition of an alibi. This defense was submitted to the jury and by them solved adversely to the contention of the appellant.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.