Case ID: ga-app_27/html/0757-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

12750.
    Aarons v. Myers et al.
    
    Decided December 13, 1921.
    Complaint; from city court of Bainbridge — Judge Spooner. July 25, 1921.
    
      J. C. Hale, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Hartsfield & Conger, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

Where the law and the evidence do not demand the verdict, the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed, although ’ based solely upon a special ground; nor will this court determine whether or not that ground was meritorious. Cox v. Grady, 132 Ga. 368 (64 S. E. 262); and authorities cited; Parks v. Stevens, 21 Ga. App. 180 (94 S. E. 60), and citations.

(a) Under the above ruling and the facts of the instant case, the judgment granting a new trial is

Affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, J.J., ooneur.