Case ID: f-appx_689/html/0329-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Antonio De Jesus RAMIREZ-OLVERA, Defendant-Appellant
    No. 16-11210 Summary Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Filed May 12, 2017
    Timothy W. Funnell, Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Antonio De Jesus Ramirez-Olvera, Pro Se
    Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Antonio De Jesus Ramirez-Olvera appeals from the denial of a postconviction pleading’ in which he purported to reserve the right to challenge his conviction and sentence under Johnson v. United States, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct, 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015). Ramirez-Olvera, in essence, sought 28 U.S.C. § 2255 relief. Thus, his pleading was an unauthorized • successive § 2255 motion that the district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain, and he has appealed from the denial of a meaningless motion. See United States v. Key, 205 F.3d 773, 774 (5th Cir. 2000); United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the’ court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.