Case ID: us_260/html/0697-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 55. No. 56.
    Sarah F. Donley v. Erwin Ray Van Horn; and Sarah F. Donley v. Prescott West.
    Error to the District Court of Appieal, Second Appellate District, of the State of California.
    Submitted October 11, 1922.
    Decided October 16, 1922.
    
      Mr. A. Haines for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles R. Pierce and Air. John M. Sutton for defendantsdn error;
   Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173, 175; Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission of Louisiana, 226 U. S. 99, 101; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418; Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S. 18, 19.