Case ID: njl_73/html/0679-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. NICHOLAS MURDACA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued December 5, 1905
    Decided December 6, 1905.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    Eor the plaintiff in error, Charles C. Blade.
    
    For the defendant in error, William II. Speer, prosecutor of the pleas.
   Per Curiam.

An examination of the assignments of error and the bills of exceptions and the causes filed for reversal, and the entire record before us, discloses no ground for reversal.

The judgment will therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dill. 15.

For reversal — None.