Case ID: nj-tax_6/html/0351-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SOUTHBRIDGE PARK, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF FORT LEE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Superior Court of New Jersey-Appellate Division
    Argued February 28, 1984
    Decided April 5, 1984.
    Before Judges ANTELL, JOELSON and McELROY.
    
      Saul A. Wolfe argued the cause for appellant (Skoloff & Wolfe, attorneys; Saul A. Wolfe of counsel and on the brief).
    
      
      Steven Muhlstock argued the cause for respondent {Melvin Gittleman, attorney; Steven Muhlstock on the brief).
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the Tax court, substantially for the reasons given by John J. Hopkins, J.T.C. in his opinion in this matter published in 4 N.J.Tax 30 (1981). We add that by reason of the stipulation entered into by plaintiff at the pretrial conference we conceive no reason for a remand.

Affirmed.