Case ID: nys_110/html/1145-08.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SHEEDEE v. CITY OF NEW YORK.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    May 1, 1908.)
    Action by Kate Sheedee against the city of New York. From an order granting a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, defendant appeals. Reversed, and motion denied.
    Royal E. T. Riggs, for appellant.
    Edward J. Maxwell, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We think that a sufficient case for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence has not been made out. The order appealed from should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 costs.