Case ID: f-appx_667/html/0167-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Michael FISHER, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-1087
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 23, 2016
    Filed: June 28, 2016
    
      John E. Beamer, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Des Moines, IA, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.
    Christopher Michael Fisher, Residential Reentry Office, Kansas City, MO, Pro Se.
    Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Christopher Michael Fisher appeals the sentence imposed by the district court following a revocation hearing. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

At the hearing, Fisher admitted that he had violated the conditions of his supervised release. The district court revoked supervised release and sentenced him to 12 months and one day in prison—a term within the recommended Guidelines revocation range—and 48 months of supervised release. Fisher asserts that the sentence is substantively unreasonable.

This court finds no abuse of discretion. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 917 (8th Cir. 2009) (discussing abuse-of-discretion review for substantive reasonableness of revocation sentence); United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009) (applying presumption of reasonableness to revocation sentence within Guidelines range).

The judgment is affirmed. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. 
      
      . The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.