Case ID: ad_227/html/0604-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James S. Woods, Respondent, v. Brooklyn Edison Company, Inc., Appellant, and Annie Fischer and Louis Fischer, Respondents.
   Judgment, as amended, and order denying motion for a new trial unanimously affirmed, with costs. The evidence supports the verdict against appellant and the jury’s finding in favor of defendants Fischer was fully permitted by the testimony. These conclusions render unnecessary a determination of the application and effect of section 211-a of the Civil Practice Act. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Seeger, JJ.