Case ID: so2d_654/html/0672-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. David BURTON, Appellee.
    No. 94-2205.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 17, 1995.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Paul M. Gayle-Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Jacqueline Schwartz, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.
    Before HUBBART, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellee’s motion in the trial court was in substance a motion seeking relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, see Venuto v. State, 615 So.2d 255, 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), which the trial court granted after evidentiary hearing. The order is affirmed, contingent on defendant’s supplying the necessary verification of his Rule 3.850 motion on remand.

Affirmed.