Case ID: so2d_796/html/0532-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Liliana CAHUASQUI, Petitioner, v. U.S. SECURITY INSURANCE CO., Respondent.
    No. SC00-1649.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Sept. 26, 2001.
    
      Juan C. Montes of Lidsky, Vaccaro & Montes, Hialeah, FL, for Petitioner.
    Michael A. Nuzzo, Miami, FL; and David B. Pakula of Fazio, Dawson, DiSal-vo, Cannon, Abers, Podrecca & Fazio, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Respondent.
    Barbara Green, Coral Gables, FL, for The Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers, Amicus Curiae.
    Frances F. Guasch of Luis E. Ordonez & Associates, Miami, FL, for State Farm Insurance Companies and Florida Insurance Council, Amici Curiae.
    Hinda Klein and Mara Shlackman of Conroy, Simberg, Ganon, Krevans & Abel, P.A., Hollywood, FL, for Florida Defense Lawyers Association, Federated National Insurance Company, and Ocean Harbor Insurance Company, Amici Curiae.
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review U.S. Security Insurance Co. v. Cahuasqui, 760 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), based on apparent conflict with Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Pinnacle Medical, Inc., 753 So.2d 55 (Fla.2000). Upon further review we have determined that conflict does not exist and that there is no other valid basis for jurisdiction here. Accordingly, the petition for review was improvidently granted and is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.