Case ID: a3d_191/html/0749-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GAMESA ENERGY USA, LLC and Gamesa Technology Corporation Inc., Petitioners v. TEN PENN CENTER ASSOCIATES, L.P. and SAP V Ten Penn Center NF G.P. L.L.C., Respondents
    Gamesa Energy USA, LLC and Gamesa Technology Corporation Inc., Respondents v. Ten Penn Center Associates, L.P. and SAP V Ten Penn Center NF G.P. L.L.C., Petitioners
    No. 139 EAL 2018 No. 152 EAL 2018
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    August 20, 2018
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal at 139 EAL 2018 is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioners, are:

1. May a litigant simultaneously pursue inconsistent, alternative remedies in a civil action in Pennsylvania prior to the entry of final judgment?
2. When one party to a contract breaches, should the non-breaching party be permitted to continue performance, if reasonable under the circumstances, and to maintain, in the alternative, causes of action for termination of the agreement if material, or if not material, for damages from the breach?

The Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal at 152 EAL 2018 is DENIED.