Case ID: sw3d_486/html/0494-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James Edward MUELLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 102456
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    
    FILED: February 9, 2016
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 24, 2016
    Application for Transfer Denied May 3, 2016
    Ron Ribaudo, 361C Quail View Dr., Ball-win, MO 63021, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Daniel N, McPherson, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

A jury convicted James Mueller (“Muel-lér”) of two counts of forcible sodomy, two counts of forcible rape, one count of attempted forcible sodomy, and five associated counts of armed criminal action. Mueller now appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Mueller claims that the.motion court clearly erred for three reasons.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).