Case ID: conn-app_36/html/0912-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Foti, J. O’Connell, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

State of Connecticut v. Scott Cavell
    (10605)
    O’Connell, Foti and Heiman, Js.
    Submitted September 19
    decision released October 18, 1994
    
      Richard Emanuel, assistant public defender, for the appellant (defendant).
    
      Susan C. Marks, assistant state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, were James E. Thomas, state’s attorney, and John Massameno, assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).
   Foti, J.

This matter is before us on remand from our Supreme Court. We previously considered it in State v. Cavell, 34 Conn. App. 276, 641 A.2d 426, remanded for reconsideration, 231 Conn. 902, 645 A.2d 1021 (1994). The Supreme Court ordered us to reconsider our judgment in light of State v. Robinson, 230 Conn. 591, 646 A.2d 118 (1994). Having reconsidered, we affirm our prior judgment.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

In this opinion Heiman, J., concurred.

O’Connell, J.,

dissenting. For the reasons set forth in State v. Cavell, 34 Conn. App. 276, 295-303, 641 A.2d 426, remanded for reconsideration, 231 Conn. 902, 645 A.2d 1021 (1994) {O’Connell, J., dissenting), I adhere to my dissent from that decision.