Case ID: so3d_192/html/0725-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE ex rel. Daniel James MOORE v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 2015-KH-1186.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 22, 2016.
   PER CURIAM.

|,WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct. Rule X § 5.

Relator has now exhausted his right to obtain post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances 'provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period' as set-out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature, in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings.- mandatory. Relator has filed an application for post-conviction relief in the District Court, and the District Court’s ruling denying relief is now final. Hereafter, unless.he can show that one of the narrow exceptions, authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The District Court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.