Case ID: nj-eq_46/html/0608-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert McCulloch, appellant, v. Thomas Dynan, respondent.
    On appeal from a decree of the chancellor, whose opinion is-reported in Dynan v. McCulloch, 1 Dick. Ch. Rep. 11.
    
    
      Mr. Alfred A. Van Movenbefg, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. John 8. Barhalow, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given by the chancellor.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Magie, Scudder, Van Syckel, Brown, Clement,. Cole, Smith, Whitaker — 12.

For reversal — None.