Case ID: njl_113/html/0035-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cubiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

INHABITANTS OF THE CITY OF PLAINFIELD, RESPONDENT, v. FRANK L. CLEARY, JUDGE, ET AL., APPELLANTS.
    Argued February 7, 1934
    — Decided May 4, 1934.
    For the respondent, William Newcorn.
    
    For the appellants, Dolliver & Feaster, Horace E. Bunker and Codington, Blatz •& Smalley.
    
   Pee Cubiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Dill, JJ. 7.

For reversal — Heher, Perskie, Kays, Wells, JJ. 4.

For reversal in part — Parker, Lloyd, JJ. 2.