Case ID: or-app_120/html/0220-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted October 28, 1992,
    reversed and remanded with instructions May 12, 1993
    STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. IVY FRANCINE CONGER, Appellant.
    
    (90-10-1676-C; CA A72340)
    851 P2d 636
    David E. Groom, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.
    Robert B. Rocklin, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Mary H. Williams, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.
    Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals her conviction for delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. In her first assignment, she contends that the court erred by denying her motion to quash the indictment on the ground that the grand jury that returned it had only six members. The parties stipulated that one grand juror had been excused during the time that the indictment in this case was being considered.

The court erred in denying the motion. Goodwin v. State of Oregon, 116 Or App 279, 840 P2d 1372 (1992).

Reversed and remanded with instructions to quash the indictment.