Case ID: so2d_682/html/0710-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      DAUKSCH, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mark W. FRANK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 96-349.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Nov. 15, 1996.
    James G. Gibson, Public Defender, and M.A. Lucas, Assistant Public Defender, Day-tona Beach, for Appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A Nielan Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appel-lee.
   DAUKSCH, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of two counts of DUI with serious bodily injury. He claims that because only one “driving episode” (appellant’s characterization) caused the two persons to be injured, he can only be convicted of one crime. Appellant concedes his argument is inconsistent with the holding in Melbourne v. State, 655 So.2d 126 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. granted, 662 So.2d 982 (Fla.1995), approved, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla.1996).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.