Case ID: f-appx_95/html/0229-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jose Antonio TALANCON, akas, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 03-10384.
    D.C. No. CR-03-05032-1-OWW.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 12, 2004.
    
    Decided April 15, 2004.
    
      William L. Sims, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Ann H. Voris, FPDCA, Fresno, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before HALL, O’SCANNLAIN and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jose Antonio appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Talancon has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Talancon has not filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the government has not filed an answering brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     
      
      . To the extent Talancon seeks substitute counsel, his request is denied as unnecessary.