Case ID: so2d_692/html/1005-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Montas MONTINA, Appellant, v. The STATE OF Florida, Appellee.
    No. 96-2588.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 7, 1997.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Douglas Gurnic, Fort Lauderdale, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The order requiring restitution under review is reversed because the “appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere based in part on the agreement that no restitution would be imposed. See Hunt v. State, 613 So.2d 893 (Fla.1992).” Taylor v. State, 672 So.2d 605, 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).