Case ID: f-appx_592/html/0227-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Howard M. FITZGERALD; Patricia A. Fitzgerald, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF PETERSBURG, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 14-2077.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 12, 2015.
    Decided: Feb. 18, 2015.
    Howard M. and Patricia A. Fitzgerald, Appellants Pro Se. Maurice Scott Fisher, Jr., Harman, Claytor, Corrigan & Well-man, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Howard M. and Patricia A. Fitzgerald appeal the district court’s orders denying their motions for reconsideration. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fitzgerald v. City of Petersburg, No. 3:14-cv-00333-HEH (E.D.Va. Aug. 12, 2014 & Sept. 9, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.