Case ID: f-cas_19/html/0161-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "THE COURT", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Case No. 10,934.
    PENN v. KLINE.
    [4 Wash. C. C. 64.] 
    
    Circuit Court, D. Pennsylvania.
    April Term, 1821.
    Habere Vacias Possessionem — Return.
    The defendant cannot call upon the marshal to return a writ of habere facias possessionem, although the plaintiff may do so.
    Rule obtained by defendant on the marshal to return the writ of habere facias posses-sionem.
    Mr. Peters, for the rule.
    Mr. Binnoy, against it.
    
      
       [Originally published from the MSS. of Hon. Bvtshrod Washington, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, under the supervision of Richard Peters, Jr., Esq.]
    
   THE COURT

decided that the defendant could not call upon the marshal to return the writ, although the plaintiff might do so. Runn. 4S4, and the cases there cited. Rule discharged.