Case ID: nys_150/html/1084-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DURYEA, Respondent, v. HENDRICKSON, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    November 20, 1914.)
    Action by Daniel P. Duryea against Pear] Hendrickson.
   PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with- $10 costs and disbursements. The lease to which defendant refers covers only lot 1713, and, without deciding whether the subsequent deed imposed the restriction, it is sufficient to justify the court’s discretion in granting the injunc-

tion that such lot has been united with other lots falling under the covenants. See, also, 150 N. Y. Supp. 1084.