Case ID: or_124/html/0540-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued March 6,
    affirmed March 13, 1928.
    In Re BUCKLEY’S ESTATE. DR. M. G. McCORKLE, v. MINNIE F. BUCKLEY, Executrix.
    (264 Pac. 1119.)
    Executors aud Administrators, 24 C. J., p. 1050, n. 4.
    From Multnomah: George Tazwell, Judge.
    Department 2.
    Affirmed.
    For appellant there was a brief over the name of Messrs. Hoy & Childers, with an oral argument by Mr. Harry Hoy.
    
    For respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Mr. Jolm G. Shillock.
    
   PER CURIAM.

This appeal is predicated on the alleged error of the lower court during term time in setting aside an order approving a final account in the estate of Charles A. Buckley, deceased.

We fail to see wherein the court abused its discretion in reopening this estate.

It follows that the d.ecree is affirmed.

Affirmed.