Case ID: sw2d_963/html/0472-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kevin EDWARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sherri DARDEN, Defendant-Respondent.
    No. 72042.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    March 10, 1998.
    Robert H. Pedroli, Clayton, for plaintiff-appellant.
    Denis C. Burns, Godfrey, Vandover & Bums, Inc., St. Louis, for defendant-respondent.
    Before CRAHAN, C.J., RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J., and GERALD M. SMITH, Senior Judge.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from the denial of his motion for a new trial in his personal injury action against defendant resulting from an automobile accident. The Court’s denial of plaintiffs new trial motion was a proper exercise of its discretion, and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).