Case ID: sw2d_796/html/0065-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. James E. GLOVER, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 54685.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Sept. 11, 1990.
    Ross W. Buehler, St. Charles, Janet Mur-chie Thompson, Columbia, for defendant-appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert V. Franson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his convictions by a jury of two counts of arson, second degree. § 569.050, RSMo 1986.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).