Case ID: a3d_81/html/1290-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Garland H. STILLWELL, Respondent.
    No. 13-BG-1072.
    District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
    Filed Dec. 26, 2013.
    Before BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judge, and NEWMAN and NEBEKER, Senior Judges.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order indefinitely suspending respondent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, with the right to apply for readmission in 60 days, see Attorney Grievance Com’n of Maryland v. Stillwell, 434 Md. 248, 74 A.3d 728 (2013), this court’s October 21, 2013, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why he should not be suspended from the practice of law for 60 days with a fitness requirement, the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Garland H. Stillwell is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of 60 days with reinstatement contingent upon a showing of fitness. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s period of suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g).