Case ID: nj-eq_86/html/0240-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William A. Baker, appellant, v. Charles Bagnole et al., respondents.
    [Submitted March 27th, 1916.
    Decided June 19th, 1916.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Advisory Master John Franklin Fort, reported in 98 Atl. Rep. ■ 857.
    
    
      Mr. Gaetano M. Belfafto, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Samuel Roessler and Messrs. Peirce .& Hoover, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Advisory Master Fort.

For affirmance — Ti-ib Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Terhune, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 15.

For reversal — None.