Case ID: f-appx_463/html/0920-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "LINN, Circuit Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

AMERANTH, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MENUSOFT SYSTEMS CORPORATION and Cash Register Sales & Service of Houston, Inc. (Doing Business as CRS Texas), Defendant-Cross Appellants.
    Nos. 2011-1469, 2011-1502.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    Jan. 13, 2012.
    James W. Gould, Locke, Lord Bissell & Liddell, LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Marc Louis Delflache, Fulbright & Ja-worski L.L.P., Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before NEWMAN, LINN, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.
   ON MOTION

LINN, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Ameranth, Inc. moves without opposition to remand these appeals due to settlement.

Ameranth states that the parties settled the case and requested an indicative ruling from the district court, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 62.1, whether the district court would defer, deny, or grant a motion to vacate the underlying judgment if the case were remanded. The district court indicated pursuant to Rule 62.1(a)(3) that it would grant the motion.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion is granted. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings as may be appropriate.

(2) Any other pending motions in this court are moot.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.