Case ID: njl_103/html/0698-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SAMUEL KATZ, APPELLANT, v. MICHAEL WILLNER, RESPONDENT.
    Submitted February 11, 1927
    Decided May 16, 1927.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curibm is printed in 4 N. J. Mis. R. 811.
    Por the appellant, Frank G. Turner.
    
    Por the respondent, Meisterman & Katchen.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.