Case ID: ny-st-rep_40/html/0983-08.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Supreme Court—General Term—First Department.
    Filed October 16, 1891.
    James F. Malcolm, Resp’t, v. The Manhattan Railway Co., App’lt.
    Appeal from judgment of the special term granting injunction unless certain damages are paid.
    
      J. E. Lord, for app’lt; E. W. Tyler, for resp’t.
   Per Curiam

All the questions of any moment involved in this appeal have already been frequently passed upon by this court, and it is not necessary now to rediscuss them.

Upon an examination of the evidence in respect to the amount of damages awarded, no injustice to the defendants appears to have been done. The theory which is attempted to be asserted, that the defendants are entitled to be credited with benefits, has been heretofore sufficiently discussed so as not to need further elaboration.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.