Case ID: so2d_624/html/0866-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frankie Steven CRAVEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-1381.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Oct. 12, 1993.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Paula S. Saunders, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
    
      Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Gypsy Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from judgment and sentence for manufacture of cannabis, possession of more than 20 grams of cannabis, and possession of paraphernalia, appellant contends he was ineffectively represented at trial. He argues that this ease falls within the narrow exception to the rule that claims of ineffectiveness of counsel are collateral matters which must first be raised on motion for post-conviction relief. Stewart v. State, 420 So.2d 862 (Fla.1982). We disagree, and affirm without prejudice to raise the claim of ineffectiveness of trial counsel in an appropriate motion for post-conviction relief.

ERVIN, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.