Case ID: sw2d_982/html/0820-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Melody A. KLING, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Dale G. KLING, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
    Nos. ED 73205, ED 73227.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Dec. 22, 1998.
    Daniel L. Goldberg, St. Charles, for appellant.
    Julius H. Berg, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before SIMON, P.J., and CRANE and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated appeal, Dale G. Kling appeals the denial of his motion to modify the maintenance provision of a dissolution decree, and Melody A. Kling appeals the trial court’s failure to award her attorney’s fees and costs. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).