Case ID: f-appx_191/html/0023-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Claude GALLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eric MARGULES, 75th Street Properties, Margules Properties, John Doe, and Jane Doe, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 05-5683-cv.
    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    July 6, 2006.
    Claude Galland, pro se, New York, N.Y., for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Stacie Bryce Feldman (Michael D. Nachtome, on the brief), Kossoff & Unger, New York, N.Y., for Defendants-Appellees.
    PRESENT: Hon. ROGER J. MINER, Hon. GUIDO CALABRESI, Circuit Judges, and Hon. JANE A. RESTANI, Chief Judge, United States Court of International Trade .
    
      
       The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Chief Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.
    
   SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-Appellant Claude Galland (“Galland”) appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Eric Margules, 75th Street Properties, Margules Properties, John Doe, and Jane Doe. The trial court issued a memorandum of decision, dismissing Galland’s complaint sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We presume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, the procedural history, and the scope of the issues presented on appeal.

We affirm, substantially for the reasons set forth in the district court’s August 2005 memorandum of decision. Galland’s alleged injuries, if true, are unfortunate but we conclude that redress for them is not available in federal court.

We have considered all of Galland’s arguments and find them to be without merit. The decision of the district court is therefore AFFIRMED.