Case ID: misc_159/html/0803-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Morris Emsig, Appellant, v. Sarah Fuchs, Also Known as Sadie Fuchs, Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    May 12, 1936.
    
      Jackson & Lester [Irwin D. Lester of counsel], for the appellant.
    
      Max Fuchs, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

An action on a bond secured by a mortgage on realty is maintainable under sections 1077-b and 1083-b of the Civil Practice Act when an action to foreclose a mortgage would be main-tamable. Moreover, the defendant, where the action is on a bond, must prove reasonable market value of the property by way of set-off.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur. Present — Levy, Hammer and Callahan, JJ.