Case ID: so2d_835/html/1158-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. GREEN, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Julian DiMASE and Gaetano DiMase, Appellants, v. AQUAMAR 176, INC., & Chicago Title Company, Appellees.
    No. 3D01-915.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Jan. 29, 2003.
    Armstrong & Mejer, P.A., and Alvaro L. Mejer, and Timothy J. Armstrong, Coral Gables, for appellants.
    Robert P. Frankel & Associates, P.A., and Robert P. Frankel, Miami, for appel-lees.
    Before JORGENSON, COPE, LEVY, GERSTEN, GODERICH, GREEN, FLETCHER, SHEVIN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
   ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

The appellants’ motion for rehearing en banc is granted and Judge Ramirez’s dissenting opinion is adopted as the opinion of the court. The judgment under review is therefore reversed.

COPE, LEVY, GERSTEN, GODERICH, FLETCHER, SHEVIN, and RAMIREZ, JJ., concur.

SCHWARTZ, C.J., is recused.

GREEN, J.

(dissenting)

I would deny the motion for rehearing en bane for the reasons expressed in the initial majority opinion of this case.

JORGENSON, J., concurs.