Case ID: ad3d_143/html/0619-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Schlesinger & Company, LLC, Appellant, v SLG 220 News Owner LLC, Respondent, et al., Defendants.
    [39 NYS3d 762]
   Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barry R. Ostrager, J.), entered on or about March 17, 2016, which denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on its cause of action for breach of a brokerage agreement as against defendant SLG 220 News Owner LLC, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff failed to establish prima facie that the successor to the original tenant was, as required by the lease’s limitation on the right to exercise the option to renew, a “successor entity to [the original] Tenant,” i.e., that it had some measure of common ownership with the original tenant (see Matter of TBA Global, LLC v Fidus Partners, LLC, 132 AD3d 195, 210 [1st Dept 2015]). Plaintiff’s alternative interpretation of the limitation clause, that any assignee of the lease was a “successor entity,” would impermissibly read the limitation out of the lease (see God’s Battalion of Prayer Pentecostal Church, Inc. v Miele Assoc., LLP, 6 NY3d 371, 374 [2006]).

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Saxe, Feinman and Kahn, JJ.