Case ID: ohio-st_115/html/0714-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nixon v. Van Gundy, Treas., et al.
    
      Supreme Court — Dismissals—No debatable constitutional question involved.
    
    (No. 19791
    Decided June 22, 1926.)
    Error to the Court of Appeals of Fairfield county.
    
      Mr. James W. McGleery and Mr. C. W. McGleery, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Mr. W. 8. Dutton, prosecuting attorney, Mr. M. A. Daugherty, and Mr. G. A. Radcliffe, for defendants in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.