Case ID: nj-eq_100/html/0557-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Walter F. Barry, appellant, v. Anna Ruskin, respondent.
    [Decided January 31st, 1927.]
    On appeal from a decree of the conrt of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Berry, whose opinion is reported in 99 N. J. Eq. 730.
    
    
      Messrs. Lum, Tamblyn & Golyer, for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. Lane, Lynch & Smith, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the conrt below by Vice-Chancellor Berry.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenci-iard, Min-turn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Hone.