Case ID: so2d_473/html/0298-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Josefina PAEZ, Appellant, v. SUSQUEHANNA BROADCASTING CORPORATION, Appellee.
    No. 84-2657.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Aug. 6, 1985.
    Taylor, Brion, Buker & Greene and Ar-naldo Velez, Miami, for appellant.
    Paul & Burt and Dan Paul, Miami, for appellee.
    Before HENDRY, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary judgment entered by the trial court upon a holding that no genuine issue exists as to any material fact. Whitten v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co., 410 So.2d 501 (Fla.1982); Johnson v. Gulf Life Insurance Co., 429 So.2d 744 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Proprietors Insurance Co. v. Siegel, 410 So.2d 993 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Appellant’s failure to comply with contest terms set forth by appellee precludes recovery. See Endres v. Buffalo Automobile Dealers Assoc., 29 Misc.2d 756, 217 N.Y.S.2d 460 (Sup.Ct.1961); Bowlerama of Texas, Inc. v. Miyakawa, 449 S.W.2d 357 (Tex.Civ.App.1969); see also Webster Lumber Co. v. Lincoln, 94 Fla. 1097, 115 So. 498 (1927); Strong & Trowbridge Co. v. H. Baars & Co., 60 Fla. 630, 54 So. 92 (1910); Sullivan v. Economic Research Properties, 455 So.2d 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Restatement (Second) of Contracts, §§ 58, 60 (1979).

Affirmed.