Case ID: so2d_280/html/0495-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronald WHEELER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 72-1475.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 24, 1973.
    Pollack, Yocom & Haggard, Alvin E. Entin, Miami, and Michael Litman, for appellant.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant defendant seeks review of his convictions and sentences on the charges of unlawful sale and possession of a narcotic drug.

Upon careful consideration of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, we have concluded that no reversible error regarding appellant’s convictions has been made to appear. However, we have noted, and the state has conceded an error in the sentencing of the appellant. See, Yost v. State, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 469. Accordingly, the convictions are hereby affirmed, but the sentences are vacated, and this cause is remanded with directions that the appellant defendant is presented to the trial court and properly sentenced in accord herewith.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part with directions.