Case ID: nj-super_144/html/0352-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DOMINICK A. D’ONOFRIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PHYLLIS D’ONOFRIO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
    Argued October 6, 1976
    Decided October 14, 1976.
    Before Judges Lora, Crane and Michels.
    
      
      Mr. LeBoy D. Safro argued the cause for appellant.
    
      Mr. George D. Rosenthal argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Rosenthal and Rubinowitz, attorneys; Mr. Jerome L. Rubinowitz on the brief).
   Per Curiam.

We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in the written, opinion of Judge Pressler, 144 N. J. Super. 200 (Ch. Div. 1976).