Case ID: so2d_526/html/1046-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sonya MICHL, Appellant/Cross-appellee, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and Gray Stores, Inc., Appellees/Cross-appellants.
    No. 87-755.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 21, 1988.
    Kirkpatrick & Lockhart and Jeffrey A. Tew and Robert B. Galt, III and Daniel A. Casey, Miami, for appellant.
    Blackwell, Walker, Fascell & Hoehl and Douglas H. Stein, Miami, for appellee.
    Before HUBBART, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
    
      
      
         Judge Ferguson did not participate in oral argument.
    
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant Sonya Michl raises several points on appeal. She maintains that the trial court erred in: failing to permit certain rebuttal testimony; refusing to permit introduction of correspondence between consumers and appellee General Electric Company; denying requested jury instructions; and limiting cross-examination of an expert witness. Finding no merit in these contentions, we affirm. See Giordano v. Ramirez, 503 So.2d 947 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Riveron v. Jervis B. Webb Co., 488 So.2d 547 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Gencorp, Inc. v. Wolfe, 481 So.2d 109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), review denied, 491 So.2d 281 (Fla.1986); 3-M Corp.—McGhan Medical Reports Div. v. Brown, 475 So.2d 994 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Thomas v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 424 So.2d 36 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Coral Plaza Corp. v. Hersman, 220 So.2d 672 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 229 So.2d 867 (Fla.1969); see also Robison v. Faine, 525 So.2d 903, 905 n. 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Cf. State, Dept. of Transportation v. Alvarez, 490 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 500 So.2d 543 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.