Case ID: or-app_94/html/0445-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted October 7,
    affirmed as modified December 14, 1988
    SCOTT, Appellant, and SCOTT, Respondent.
    
    (87C-31557; CA A48104)
    764 P2d 1382
    Myron L. Enfield, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Enfield, Guimond & Brown, Salem.
    Howard W. Collins, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.
    Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Husband appeals from a dissolution judgment, contending that $350 per month child support for each child and $500 per month spousal support are excessive and that he should not be required to maintain a $100,000 life insurance policy naming wife and children as beneficiaries. The parents share custody of the two children equally. On de novo review, we modify the child support and affirm in all other respects.

On de novo review, we agree that the award of $350 per month per child is excessive. Therefore, we modify the judgment to provide $275 per month per child. Belt and Belt, 65 Or App 606, 672 P2d 1205 (1983).

We have considered husband’s other assignments and find no error.

Judgment modified to provide child support of $275 per month per child; otherwise affirmed. Costs to husband.