Case ID: mo_155/html/0568-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MARSHALL, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HAAS, Appellant, v. GARNETT et al.
    Division One,
    March 30, 1900.
    CJtley v. Hill, 3 55 Mo. 232, followed and approved.
    Appeal from Saline Circuit Court. — lion. Richard Field, J udge.
    Affirmed.
    
      Nathan Frank, Chas. W. Bates and Benjamin H. Charles for appellant.
    
      Thos. Shackelford, W. M. Williams, John A. Rich, Syd B. Burks and D. D. Duggins for respondents, except Field, administrator.
   MARSHALL, J.

This case in all its essential particulars is exactly like the case of Utley v. Hill, 155 Mo. 232, and the decision in that case controls this. Here there were thirty-six exceptions filed, but the court sustained the same- exceptions that it sustained in the Htley case. Otherwise there is no difference between the two cases, and therefore for the reasons given in the Utley case, the judgment in this case is affirmed.

All concur, except Robinson, J., absent.