Case ID: f-appx_710/html/0433-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antoinette Theresa KNOWLES, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 17-10569 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    (February 1, 2018)
    Edwin F. Knight, Robert G. Davies, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, Christopher P. Canova, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee
    Antoinette Theresa Knowles, Pro Se
    Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, WILSON and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Patricia Jean Kyle, appointed counsel for Antoinette Theresa Knowles in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Knowles’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.