Case ID: njl_109/html/0351-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FILOMENA MIGLIACCIO, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM, ETC., APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC SERVICE RAILWAY COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
    Argued May 19, 1932 —
    Decided October 17, 1932.
    For the appellant, Feinberg & Feinberg.
    
    For the respondent, Henry H. Fryling.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.