Case ID: us_393/html/1054-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Douglas,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 785.
    Cheng Fu Sheng et al. v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service.
    
      David Carliner and Robert S. Bixby for petitioners.
    
      Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Roger A. Pauley for respondent.
   C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas,

dissenting.

I would grant this petition and put the case down for argument.

Under § 243 (h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 66 Stat. 214, as amended, 79 Stat. 918, 8 U. S. C. § 1253 (h) (1964 ed., Supp. Ill), the Attorney General is authorized to withhold deportation of any alien who would, if returned to his country, be subject “to persecution on account of . . . political opinion.”

Taiwan’s intolerance of criticism is well known. Lei Chen, after a one-day military trial, was sentenced to 10 years for trying to form a non-Communist political party in opposition to the Kuomintang. Military trials of men expressing “radical” ideas are common. The pressures to conform to Kuomintang orthodoxy are so great that no more than 5% of the students who go abroad to study return to Taiwan.

These petitioners, who have denounced the Chiang Kai-shek regime as a “police state,” will most assuredly either face a firing squad on their return or receive heavy sentences. Any person critical of the regime is called a “defector.” The list of political victims of Taipei’s intolerance is too long and the secret military trials of dissidents too notorious for me to acquiesce in denial of certiorari here.