Case ID: so2d_420/html/0386-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Willie Frank BURNS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 82-142.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 12, 1982.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Harold T. Fields, Jr., Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Penny H. Hershoff, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before NESBITT, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

A trial judge’s findings should not be disturbed unless they are unsupported by the evidence. Sired v. State, 399 So.2d 964 (Fla.1981). In this court, a trial court’s ruling on a Motion to Suppress is clothed with a presumption of correctness, McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410 (Fla.1978), and reasonable inferences favor affirmance of the trial court. See Bova v. State, 392 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Churney v. State, 348 So.2d 395 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Affirmed.