Case ID: f-appx_239/html/0782-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel ROSS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. State of NORTH CAROLINA; North Carolina Industrial Commission, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 07-1136.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 15, 2007.
    Decided: Sept. 6, 2007.
    Daniel Ross, Appellant Pro Se. Tracy Chappell Curtner, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Daniel Ross appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ross v. North Carolina, No. 5:06-cv-00218-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 1, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.