Case ID: ny_105/html/0678-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Danforth, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James F. Mooney, Respondent, v. John Loughlin, Appellant.
    (Argued April 29, 1887;
    decided May 13, 1887)
    The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment was the only question presented in this action.
    
      Roger A. Pryor for appellant.
    
      Daniel G. Harriman for respondent.
   Danforth, J.,

reads for affirmance.

All concur, except Raparlo, J., dissenting, and Earl, J., not voting.

Order affirme .