Case ID: nj-eq_86/html/0251-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George M. LaMonte, commissioner, respondent, v. Charles C. Lurich et al., appellants.
    [Submitted March 27th, 1916.
    Decided June 9th, 1916.]
    On appeal from a decree of the .court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevens, whose opinion is reported ante p. ®6.
    
    
      Mr. Roger Hinds, for the respondent,
    
      Mr. Abram H. Cornish and Mr. Ottó A. Stiefel, for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Terhune, Heppenheimer,-Williams, Taylor, Gardner — M.

For reversal — Hone.