Case ID: f-appx_31/html/0491-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David S. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANDREW CORPORATION, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 01-15346. D.C. No. CV-99-00800-GEB(JFM).
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Feb. 13, 2002 .
    Decided March 5, 2002.
    Before WALLACE, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Williams’s need for leave was foreseeable and he did not give the notice required by the California Family Rights Act. See Cal. Gov’t Code § 12945.2(h). Because we affirm the grant of summary judgment against Williams, his request for leave to file a jury demand is moot.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.