Case ID: nw2d_923/html/0137-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Daniel Lynn GOLDSACK, Defendant and Appellant
    Nos. 20180265 20180266
    Supreme Court of North Dakota.
    Filed February 21, 2019
    Justin J. Schwarz, Assistant State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
    Russell J. Myhre, Enderlin, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
   Per Curiam.

[¶1] Daniel Goldsack appeals from a district court's second amended criminal judgments revoking his probation. Goldsack argues the district court clearly erred in finding a probation violation occurred and the State did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence Goldsack violated the conditions of his probation. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4) and (7). See, e.g., State v. McAvoy , 2007 ND 178, ¶¶ 9, 18, 741 N.W.2d 198 (holding the trial court's factual findings of a probation violation were not clearly erroneous and concluding the court did not abuse its discretion in revoking the defendant's probation).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jon J. Jensen

Jerod E. Tufte