Case ID: njl_82/html/0729-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MICHAEL J. BROWN, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. WOLFGANG WINTER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted December 11, 1911
    Decided March 4, 1912.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 51 Vroom 632.
    For the plaintiff in error, Howe & Davis.
    
    For the defendant in error, Charles F. LigMhipe.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bergen in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Voorhees, Minturn, Kalisck, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Congdon, White, Treacy, JJ. 14.

For reversal—Xone.