Case ID: sd_64/html/0641-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "P'ER CXJRIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE FEDERAL LAND BANK OF OMAHA, Appellant, v. SCHIAGER, et al, Respondents.
    (269 N. W. 567.)
    (File No. 7983.
    Opinion filed November 16, 1936.)
    
      Bidski, ElUott & McQuillen, of Sioux Falls, and Clair L. Kintz, of Omaha, Neb., for Appellant.
    
      Louis H. Smith, of Sioux Falls, for Respondents.
   P'ER CXJRIAM.

This appeal presents the same question involved' in the case of Kapaun v. Federal Land Bank of Omaha, 64 S. D. 635, 269 N. W. 564, opinion this day filed. By stipulation of counsel approved' 'by this court, it has been agreed that the present appeal should abide the result of the Kapaun Case. Pursuant to the views stated in the Kapaun opinion, the order here appealed from will also' be reversed, and the matter remanded, with directions for the entry of an order dismissing the petition of the mortgagors.

All the Judges concur, excepting RUDOLPH, J., who deems himself disqualified, and does not sit.