Case ID: so2d_235/html/0328-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bernice RIEMER, Appellant, v. David RIEMER, Appellee.
    No. 69-794.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 19, 1970.
    Bloom & Saks, Miami, for appellant.
    Wallace & Kreutzer, Miami, for appel-lee.
    Before CHARLES CARROLL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Carlton v. Carlton, Fla.1958, 104 So.2d 363, on the issue of insufficiency of proof as to the allegations of extreme cruelty; see Martin v. Martin, Fla.1953, 66 So.2d 268, as to the general rule of proper corroboration of testimony.