Case ID: cust-ct_6/html/0536-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Keefe, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 45355.
    Protests 3838-K, etc., of Beesemyer Ridnour Co. et al. (Los Angeles).
   Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Stokby v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358) it was held that duty should have been assessed under paragraph 703, Tariff Act of 1930, on the net weight of the contents of the tins less 10 percent allowance for the gelatinous material.