Case ID: sw3d_509/html/0860-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Leonardo DRISDEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    ED 103894
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: February 7, 2017
    Kevin B. Gau, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    
      Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Leonardo Drisdel appeals from a denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).