Case ID: d-haw_4/html/0691-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Clemons, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF SHOTARO HOKAMURA FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.
    March 31, 1916.
    
      Aliens — Immigration—Domiciled- aliens: The Immigration Act, 34 Stat. 898, as amended, applies to domiciled aliens returning to Hawaii after temporary absence abroad, regardless of whether they established their domicile here before or after annexation.
    
      Habeas Corpus: Plearing on return to writ.
    
      John W. Cathcart for petitioner.
    
      H. W. Vaughan, U. S. District Attorney, for respondent.
   Clemons, J.

There is no need of any extended discussion of the evidence in this case, it being ample to sustain the 'deportation order of the Secretary of Labor.

As to the contention, that the alien' having come to Hawaii before Annexation, and established a domicil here, and being now here on return from a temporary absence, he is not within the contemplation of the law, — following the ruling of this court in In re Ching Lum, ante, p. 376: This contention is in my opinion, disposed of by Lapina v. Williams, 232 U. S., 78, in view of the fact that after Annexation the alien went out of the country on a year’s visit to Japan. Under the authority just cited, the Immigration Act applies to domiciled aliens returning to the country as well as to aliens coming here for the first time.

Let the writ be dismissed and the petitioner be remanded to the custody of the respondent.