Case ID: sw2d_130/html/0306-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": ".SMITH, Chief Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. v. BRAKEBILL.
    No. 10703.
    Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.
    July 5, 1939.
    Kerr & Gayer, of San Angelo, and G. A. Wynn, of Sonora, for appellant.
    John C.; Patterson, of Mexia, and C. Si Farmer, of Waco, for appellee.
   .SMITH, Chief Justice.

In this case the parties have filed their joint motion to advance submission and reform and affirm the judgment for a specific amount, or, in the alternative,, to reverse the judgment -and remand the cause to the trial court.for the purpose of entering, jüdgment there, in pursuance of an agreement o'f the parties to compromise and settle the litigation..

We conclude that the better practice is to reverse and remand, as prayed for, and that will be done, at the cost of appellant.

It is so ordered.