Case ID: sw3d_502/html/0069-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William OWENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    ED 103965
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: October 25, 2016
    Gwenda Renee Robinson, District Defender, Office B/Area 68, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Owens (“Movant”) appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).