Case ID: f-appx_249/html/0378-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Derrick Anthony SARDIN, also known as Xavier James Sardin, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-10411
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Oct. 3, 2007.
    Alan M. Buie, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    James Warren St. John, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    
      Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Derrick Anthony Sardin raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Beydoun, 469 F.3d 102, 108 (5th Cir.2006), which held that there is no Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004) violation when hearsay testimony is used at sentencing, rather than at trial. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.