Case ID: ad2d_110/html/0844-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John E. Borg, Appellant.
   The hearing court properly determined that defendant and his wife had voluntarily consented to the searches (see, People v Gonzalez, 39 NY2d 122) and that defendant’s statement to Investigator McKnight after defendant had invoked his right to counsel was admissible as a spontaneous statement (see, People v Rogers, 48 NY2d 167). We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be lacking in merit. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Thompson and Lawrence, JJ., concur.