Case ID: cole-cai-cas_1/html/0148-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edmund Seaman v. John Davenport and others, tenants in possession.
    
   IN partition, after service of the petition and notice, Hopkins moved for a rule to appear and answer. The court at first thought this a rule of course ; but on the counsel’s observing, that proof of service was by the act required to be made to the satisfaction of . the court, and that the manner of the service would, according to the act, vary in particular cases, the courts seemed to coincide, but said that the rule must be , drawn qp as the party should be advised.