Case ID: mann-unrep-cas_1/html/0249-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Spencer, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 948.
    Elizabeth F. Bailey, Tutrix, vs. David Ward.
    Pull ownership consists of three rights, — ustw.fructus, and dbusus, — and each may he vested in a different person. All are real rights, and are movable or immovable according to the nature of the property.
    A right to the use and occupancy of land does not necessarily or by implication imply any right of ownership therein, and may be proved by parol. So, parol testimony is admissible to prove the understanding or agreement under which one built a dwelling on another’s land, and the purposes for which it was built, and the circumstances under which one commenced to occupy the same, and the mutual understanding as to the continuance of that occupancy.
    Appeal from the District Court for Union. Lewis, J.
    
      Ramsey for Plaintiff.
   Spencer, J.,

delivered the opinion remanding the case.