Case ID: so2d_782/html/0545-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Honore WESBERT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D00-912.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 18, 2001.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Lisa Walsh, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Mark Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before GODERICH and SHEVIN, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s decision revoking defendant’s probation. However, as the State acknowledges, the trial court’s written Order of Probation Violation does not conform to the oral pronouncements made by the trial judge at the time that the probation was revoked. Accordingly, while we affirm the revocation of probation, we remand the cause to the trial court with directions to enter an Order of Revocation that conforms to the' trial judge’s oral pronouncements. See Suarez v. State, 761 So.2d 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)

Affirmed and remanded with directions.