Case ID: f-appx_383/html/0444-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BARNA CONSHIPPING, S.L., Plaintiff-Appellant v. COMMERCIAL METALS CO., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 09-20611.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    June 23, 2010.
    Frederick William Mahley, Strasburger & Price, Houston, TX, David N. Ventker, Daniel R. Warman, Ventker & Warman, P.L.L.C., Norfolk, VA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    George H. Bowles, Williams Mullen, Virginia Beach, VA, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before JOLLY, SMITH, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

After studying the briefs, hearing argument, and reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court correctly decided this case. Specifically, the appellant’s complaint fails to allege, first, any facts sufficient to show abandonment, see Adams v. Unione Mediterranea Di Sicurta, 220 F.3d 659, 671 (5th Cir.2000); second, it has failed to establish that it is a party to or third-party beneficiary of any maritime contract that would give it a maritime lien, see Norfolk S. Ry. Co. v. Kirby, 543 U.S. 14, 31-32, 125 S.Ct. 385, 160 L.Ed.2d 283 (2004). The judgment of the district court is therefore

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.