Case ID: misc2d_17/html/0102-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

New Amsterdam Import Company, Inc., Appellant, v. L & S Delivery & Transfer Co., Inc., Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate ¡Term, First Department,
    February 11, 1959.
    
      
      Levy & Sonet (Daniel Levy of counsel), for appellant.
    
      Robert F. Mitchell, Jr., for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Defendant’s unilateral mistake of fact as to the method of delivery required by the contract was not such as would relieve it of its obligations thereunder, since the plaintiff changed its position in reliance upon the agreement (Abner M. Harper, Inc. v. Newburgh, 159 App. Div. 695).

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judg-' ment directed for the plaintiff in the sum of $574.70, with costs.

Concur — Hecht, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.