Case ID: f-appx_334/html/0568-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael MOMENT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of MARYLAND; Martin O’Malley, Governor; Douglas F. Gansler, Attorney General; Montgomery County Maryland; Ike Leggeil, County Executive for Montgomery County, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 09-1544.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 20, 2009.
    Decided: Oct. 23, 2009.
    
      Michael Moment, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Moment appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Moment’s motion for injunctive relief and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moment v. Maryland, No. 8:09-cv-01081-DKC (D.Md. May 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED. 
      
      
        Dist. of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923).