Case ID: f-appx_377/html/0597-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of: Alexis Mager LAKUSTA, Debtor, Alexis Mager Lakusta, Appellant, v. Mark H. Evans; et al., Appellees.
    No. 07-17014.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 5, 2010.
    
    Filed April 20, 2010.
    Alexis Mager Lakusta, pro se.
    Julie Marie Glosson, Esquire, U.S. Trustee, Esquire, Office of the U.S., Trustee, San Francisco, CA, James Roberts, Roberts & Eliott, LLP, San Jose, CA, for Appellees.
    Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Alexis Mager Lakusta appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his Chapter 7 case. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review decisions of the bankruptcy court independently without deference to the district court’s determinations. Leichty v. Neary (In re Strand), 375 F.3d 854, 857 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm.

The bankruptcy court did not improperly dismiss Lakusta’s claims on any of the grounds asserted.

Evans’s request for sanctions is denied.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.