Case ID: pa_420/html/0403-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam;", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Di Chiacchio, Appellant, v. Rockcraft Stone Products Company, Appellant.
    
      March 22, 1966:
    Argued January 5, 1966.
    Before Bell, C. J., Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.
    
      Sheldon L. Albert, with him James E. Beasley, for plaintiff.
    
      John J. O’Brien, Jr., for defendant.
   Opinion

Per Curiam;

Plaintiff, Joseph Di Chiacchio, recovered a jury verdict against Rockcraft Stone Products-Company-in an action of trespass. The jury’s-verdict was in the amount of $25,000. Subsequent to trial, Rockcraft filed a inotión for new trial and, on 'August 10, 1965, the. court en banc entered the.following order: “It is ordered that damages in. excess: of $12,000.00. be remitted within 30 days, otherwise-New Trial granted as to damages only.” On Séptémber 2, 1965, Rockcraft filed its appeal at No. 360. Subsequently, Di. Chiacchio filed, an appeal at No. 364.

Both appeals are premature and must be quashed. While the court below entered an order directing that that portion of the verdict in excess of $12,000 be remitted or new trial granted, Rockcraft filed its appeal within the 30 day period and the new trial order had no opportunity to become effective. In any event, no judgment in any amount having .been entered against Rockcraft and no order precluding its defense as to liability having become effective, Rockcraft’s appeal is premature.

1The same situation exists with respect to Di Chiacchio. While Di Chiacchio could appeal from a new trial order in these circumstances, such order is not, in the present posture of the litigation, effective.

The appeals must therefore be quashed and the record remanded to the court below with directions to allow 20 days from the date of the filing of this - opinion for the election of Di Chiacchio under the Court’s-order to be made.

Appeals quashed and record remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Mr. Justice Musmanno dissents.