Case ID: sw2d_878/html/0519-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gerry S. ENGER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Daniel LUEPKE, d/b/a Mid-America Outdoorsman Association, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. 64817.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    June 28, 1994.
    Henry F. Luepke, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Gerry S. Enger, pro se.
    Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Daniel Luepke, appeals from an order entered in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Charles requiring him to refund $300.00 to respondent, Gerry S. Enger, on a membership purchased by respondent in appellant’s hunt club. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, as well as the transcripts and the legal file, and find no clear error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We, therefore, affirm the judgement of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.