Case ID: f-appx_125/html/0141-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harvinder SINGH, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 03-73223.
    Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 11, 2005.
    
    Decided March 16, 2005.
    Earle A. Sylva, George T. Heridis, Rai & Associates, PC, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.
    Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Marshall Tamor Golding, David Y. Bernal, Attorney, Richard M. Evans, Russell J.E. Verby, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before WALLACE, RAWLINSON, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 43(c)(2).
    
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Petitioner Harvinder Singh applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture protection. The immigration judge denied his application based on an adverse credibility finding, which the BIA affirmed. Singh now petitions for a rehearing.

The panel reviews the BIA’s denial of asylum or withholding of removal for substantial evidence. Cordon-Garcia v. INS, 204 F.3d 985, 990 (9th Cir.2000). Singh’s testimony contained material inconsistencies. We therefore find that the adverse credibility finding was supported by substantial evidence.

PETITION DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.