Case ID: okla-crim_16/html/0706-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BERT SHADRICK v. STATE.
    No. A-3266.
    Opinion Filed Sept. 2, 1919.
    (183 Pac. 520.)
    Appeal from County Court, Oklahoma County; Wm. H. Zwick, Judge.
    Bert Shadrick was convicted of a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Pruiett, Sniggs & Patterson, for plaintiff in error.
    The Attorney General and W. C. Hall, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Bert Shadrick, and Charles H. Holden were jointly charged, tried, and convicted on an information charging the' unlawful transporting of 60 half pints of whisky in an Overland automobile from one point to another certain point in Oklahoma City. The jury fixed the punishment of each at confinement for three months in the county jail and a fine of $25C- From the judgments rendered in pursuance of the verdict an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on February 20, 1918, petition in error, with case-made.

The appeal of the defendant Holden was dismissed on account of tus leaving the state without leave of the court. 14 Okla. Cr. 463, 172 Pac. 977. An examination of the record discloses that the testimony on the part of the Gate to prove the allegations of the information is undisputed, and that the errors assigned are destitute of merit.

The judgment against the plaintiff in error, Bert Shadrick, is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.