Case ID: nj-eq_69/html/0834-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Louisa Avakian, respondent, v. Hagop Avakian, appellant.
    [Submitted July 10th, 1905.
    Decided March 5th, 1906.]
    On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Pitney, whose opinion is reported ante p. 89.
    
    
      Messrs. Weller & Lichtenstein, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Fuseiius W. Arrow smith, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Pitney.

For affirmance—The Chiee-J ustice, Garrison, Fort, Gabretson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Vroom. Green, Gray, Dill—12.

For reversal—Dixon—1.