Case ID: f-appx_303/html/0137-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David E. HENDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, FIREARMS, TOBACCO & EXPLOSIVES; Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement; Department of Homeland Security; Judge Mulkasey, United States Department of Justice; Robert Mueller, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 08-2016.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 11, 2008.
    Decided: Dec. 15, 2008.
    David E. Henderson, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

David E. Henderson appeals the district court’s order granting his request to proceed in forma pauperis but dismissing this case as patently frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Henderson v. Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms, Tobacco & Explosives, No. l:08-ev-01845-WDQ (D.Md. Aug. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.