Case ID: njl_102/html/0218-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHARLES H. INGERSOLL, RESPONDENT, v. VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE ET AL., APPELLANTS.
    Submitted May 29, 1925
    Decided September 29, 1925.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N. J. Mis. R. 335.
    For the appellants, Riker & Riker.
    
    For the respondent, Howe & Davis.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment appealed from 'will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.