Case ID: f-appx_191/html/0593-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Acharmu Yazaid CROSBY, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as the Governor of the State of California; et al., Respondents—Appellees.
    No. 05-55330.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 24, 2006.
    
    Filed July 26, 2006.
    Acharmu Yazaid Crosby, Blythe, CA, pro se.
    George H. Williamson, Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.
    Before: ALARCÓN, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, appellant's request for oral argument is denied.
    
   MEMORANDUM

California state prisoner Acharmu Yazaid Crosby appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging the conditions of parole imposed following his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo, see White v. Lambert, 370 F.3d 1002, 1005 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm.

The district court correctly determined that Crosby failed to exhaust his state court remedies prior to filing his federal habeas petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1). Accordingly, we decline to address Crosby’s substantive contentions.

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.