Case ID: sw_135/html/0568-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DAVIDSON, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WATKINS v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    March 15, 1911.)
    Criminal Law (§ 1094*) — Appeal—Affirmance — Insufficient Record.
    A conviction must be affirmed, where there is no motion for new trial or bill of exceptions in the record, and nothing in the record on which reversal is asked.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Dec. Dig. § 1094.*]
    Appeal from District Court, El Paso County; James R. Harper, Judge.
    Ed. Watkins, alias Ed. Liggins, was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of burglary; his punishment being assessed at five years’ confinement In the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a motion for new trial or bill of exceptions. There is nothing pointed out in the record upon which appellant bases a ground for reversal.

As the record is presented, the judgment is affirmed.