Case ID: cust-ct_2/html/0775-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 41705.
    Protests 195231-G, etc., of G. & S. Embroidery Co. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the-authority of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) articles embroidered and trimmed with lace and Normandy laces like those the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) were held dutiable at 75-percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.