Case ID: sw3d_71/html/0243-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Shawn B. PLATT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 60176.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    March 26, 2002.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
    Susan L. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before ULRICH, P.J., BRECKENRIDGE and HARDWICK, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Shawn B. Platt appeals the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief because it was not filed within the deadline of Rule 24.035. He argues that the dismissal violated his due process rights because good cause existed for his failure to file the motion in a timely manner. The time limits imposed by Rule 24.035 are valid and mandatory. Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo. banc), cert. denied sub nom., Walker v. State, 493 U.S. 866, 110 S.Ct. 186, 107 L.Ed.2d 141 (1989). Since a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).