Case ID: so2d_912/html/1274-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The DOCTOR’S OFFICE, d/b/a The Children’s Office, Appellant, v. AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, Appellee.
    No. 4D04-3412.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Nov. 2, 2005.
    Joy A. Bartmon of The Law Offices of Bartmon & Bartmon, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant.
    Garnett W. Chisenhall, Tallahassee, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the Agency for Health Care Administration’s final order accepting the administrative law judge’s recommendations. On appeal, The Doctor’s Office argues that review should be by peer review organization rather than individual peer. This point was not raised below. In the absence of fundamental error, the point is deemed waived on appeal. Perry v. State, 817 So.2d 985, 987 n. 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

STONE, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.