Case ID: f-appx_54/html/0465-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Kenneth Clinton HEIBER, aka Kenneth Heiber, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 02-10082.
    D.C. No. CR-00-1060 EHC.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Dec. 6, 2002.
    Decided Jan. 14, 2003.
    Before BRUNETTI and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, District Judge.
    
    
      
       The Honorable David A. Ezra, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Kenneth Heiber (“Heiber”) appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Before the district court accepts a plea, a defendant has “an absolute right to withdraw his plea.” United States v. Alvarez-Tautimez, 160 F.3d 573, 576 (9th Cir.1998); see also United States v. Washman, 66 F.3d 210, 212 (9th Cir.1995) (holding that a defendant may withdraw his plea before it is accepted “without offering any reason”). At the time that Heiber moved to withdraw his guilty plea, the district court had not yet accepted his plea. Therefore, the district court erred by not allowing Heiber to withdraw his plea. The judgment is therefore vacated and the case remanded to permit Heiber to withdraw his plea of guilty and for such further proceedings as may be necessary.

VACATED and REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.