Case ID: ala_228/html/0699-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "FOSTER, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

153 So. 918
    SOVEREIGN CAMP, W. O. W., v. Minnie DANIEL.
    7 Div. 233.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    March 29, 1934.
    Wm. B. McCollough, of Birmingham, for appellant.
    Culli & Culli and Joe F. Duke, all of Gadsden, for appellee.
   FOSTER, Justice.

The undisputed facts of this ease show that it is controlled by our cases of Higgins v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., 224 Ala. 644, 141 So. 562; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Batty, 227 Ala. 50, 148 So. 811; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Harden, 227 Ala. 700, 150 So. 921.

No ruling assigned by appellant was prejudicial when so considered. The judgment is affirmed on the authority of those eases.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.