Case ID: so2d_648/html/0249-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Arline NEUFELD, Appellant, v. Scott NEUFELD, Appellee.
    No. 94-2774.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 28, 1994.
    Elser, Greene & Hodor and Cynthia Greene, Miami, for appellant.
    Beth Tyler Vogelsang, Miami, for appellee.
    Before COPE, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The record contains substantial competent evidence to support the trial court’s ruling. There is no legal basis for this Court to disturb the trial court’s determination regarding the credibility of the witnesses. Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13, 16 (Fla.), on remand to, 336 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Povia v. Melvin, 66 So.2d 494, 494 — 95 (Fla.1953); Ross v. Bandi, 566 So.2d 55, 56 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); S. Kornreich & Sons, Inc. v. Titan Agencies, Inc., 423 So.2d 940, 942 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Atkins v. Keller, 400 So.2d 168, 169 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 411 So.2d 380 (Fla.1981). Accordingly, the trial court’s decision is affirmed,