Case ID: f2d_12/html/1012-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles D. BARRY et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. R. M. BAILEY COMPANY, Defendant in Error.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    June 1, 1926.)
    No. 361.
    In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
    Fraser, Speir & Meyer (Schuyler M. Meyer and John L. Dunn, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Booth & Hewitt, of New York City (Enos S. Booth, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant in error.
    Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and HAND, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.