Case ID: fla_151/html/0546-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GEORGE HANS HIPPEL v. CORA M. HIPPEL
    9 So. (2nd) 927
    Division A
    October 13, 1942
    Carson, Petteway & Roman, for appellant.
    A. Frank Katzentine & W. Sanders Gramling and Alonzo Wilder, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM:

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the final decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree. It is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.