Case ID: ohio-law-abs_13/html/0508-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      KUNKLE, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SHAW MARCHANT CO v McCRAY REFRIGERATOR SALES CORP
    Ohio Appeals, 2nd Dist, Montgomery Co
    No 1121.
    Decided June 2, 1932
    Cross & Miller for plaintiff in error.
    Pickrel, Harshman & Young, Dayton, for defendant in error.
   KUNKLE, J.

We think the trial court was without jurisdiction to render the judgment' and that the motion objecting to the court’s jurisdiction over the person of the defendant was merely a special appearance. It did not enter the appearance of the defendant below to the merits of the case.

From such judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, error is prosecuted to this court. From a consideration of the briefs of counsel and the record, we are of opinion that the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas was correct and that the same should be affirmed and cause remanded.

ALLREAD, PJ, and HORNBECK, J, concur.