Case ID: f-appx_209/html/0898-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Emma MALONE, by and through her father and next friend, James MALONE, James Malone, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MARSHALL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Lowell Smith, Amy Holcomb, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 06-13969
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Dec. 5, 2006.
    Howard Edgar Howard, Ford, Howard & Cornett, P.C., Gadsden, AL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    Katherine C. Hortberg, Mark S. Board-man, Boardman, Carr, Weed & Hutcheson, P.C., Chelsea, AL, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and CARNES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

In its Memorandum Opinion of June 29, 2006, the district court granted appellees summary judgment on alternative holdings: (1) appellants failed to establish the substantive due process right alleged in their complaint; and (2) assuming they established such right, appellants failed to show that the right was clearly established at the time of appellees’ actions. Appellants now appeal the court’s ruling. As we agree with the district court’s alternative holdings (for the reasons the court gave in its June 29 order), we affirm the court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.