Case ID: ind_223/html/0178-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Fields v. Hahn.
    [No. 17,256.
    (Appellate Court.)
    Filed February 26, 1945.]
    [For opinion of the Appellate Court, see 115 Ind. App. 365.J
    
      Delph L. McKesson, and Marshall F. Kizer, both of Plymouth, and Kenneth Booz, of Bourbon, for appellant.
    
      Homer, McDowell and Gast, of Winamac, and Stevens and Stevens, of Plymouth, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Appellee’s petition to transfer purports to be grounded on clause (b) of subsection (4), Rule 2-23, 1943 Revision, “that the opinion of the Appellate Court erroneously decides a new question of law.” The petition deals solely with appellee’s contention that appellant was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law, a subject that was not men-tinned in the opinion of the Appellate Court. There is no attempt to comply with either clause (a) or clause (c). No question being presented for our consideration, the petition is dismissed.

Note.—Reported in 59 N. E. (2d) 359.