Case ID: f-appx_70/html/0144-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kenneth GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNKNOWN SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OFFICIALS; South Carolina Administrative Law Judge Division, Defendants-Appellees, and Clerk of the South Carolina Supreme Court, Defendant.
    No. 03-6496.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted July 24, 2003.
    Decided July 30, 2003.
    Kenneth Green, Appellant Pro Se. Ruskin C. Foster, McCutchen, Blanton, Johnson & Barnette, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Green seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting a magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as to some claims. The court ordered that Green’s suit continue as to remaining claims. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Because it does not dispose of all of his § 1983 claims, the order Green seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.