Case ID: mann-unrep-cas_1/html/0194-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Spencer, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 5786.
    Heirs of Gutierrez vs. B. & W. Croner et al.
    Attachment: is not justifiable when the defendants have on hand a large stock of goods- and are not involved, although they were advertising that they were selling at great sacrifices, and were removing their goods to another store in a different part of the-city, the removal being openly and publicly carried on and with the avowed intention to continue business at the new stand.
    Bills of exception never submitted to the opposing counsel, and not presented to the court nor filed therein until one month after appeal taken and bond filed, will not be-considered if objected to by the opposing counsel.
    It is a part of the law of landlord and tenant that the latter is at once bound, for the rent of the whole term if, without lawful cause, he abandons the premises before the expiration of the lease.
    Appeal from the Sixth District Court of New Orleans. Saucier, J.
    
      Bright for Plaintiffs. Gotton & Levy for Defendants Appellants.
   Spencer, J.,

delivered the opinion setting aside the attachment and in other respects affirming the judgment. Manning, C, J., delivered the opinion on rehearing refusing to disturb the decree theretofore entered.