Case ID: se2d_629/html/0850-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

W.D. GOLDSTON, Jr. James E. Harrington, and citizens, taxpayers and bondholders similarly situated v. STATE of North Carolina and Michael F. Easley, Governor, individually and in his official capacity.
    No. 328PA04-2.
    Supreme Court of North Carolina.
    March 2, 2006.
    R. Daniel Boyce, G. Eugene Boyce, Philip R. Isley, Raleigh, Anthony M. Brannon, for Goldston and Harrington.
    John Maddrey, Norma S. Harrell, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, for State of NC.
    Robert F. Orr, Raleigh, Pamela S. Cashwell, Jeanette Doran Brooks, for NCICL.
    ORDER
   Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Plaintiffs on the 25th day of October 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Defendants, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th day of October 2005 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th day of October 2005 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of constitutional issues of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2006."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).