Case ID: so2d_616/html/0049-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bennie Lee PEARSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 80488.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    April 8, 1993.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Sheryl J. Lowenthal, Special Appointed Public Defender, Coral Gables, for petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Hollywood, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Pearson v. State, 603 So.2d 676 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), based on express and direct conflict with Lamont v. State, 610 So.2d 435 (Fla.1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The opinion below is quashed to the extent it is inconsistent with Lamont and remanded for reconsideration.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.