Case ID: ny-2d_28/html/0923-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Benjamin A. Javits, an Attorney, Appellant. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Respondent.
    Submitted May 3, 1971;
    decided May 13, 1971.
    
      
      John G. Bonomi and Martin J. Linshy for motion.
    
      James H. Hatpin opposed.
   Motion granted and appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the grounds that the Appellate Division dissent is not “on a stated question of law in favor of the party taking such appeal ’ ’ (CPLR 5601, subd. [a], par. [i]) and that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Appellant, if so advised, may move for reargument of his appeal in the Appellate Division if he believes, as he asserts, that some of the charges sustained were found without adequate notice to him.