Case ID: nys_125/html/1124-09.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HOLLYWOOD, Respondent, v. COLLING, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    October 7, 1910.)
    Action by Frances Hollywood againát Henry Colling.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that, while the plaintiff was entitled to recover against the defendant for use and occupation of the premises, there was also sufficient evidence of the value of the cash register to make a prima facie casé in support of the counterclaim.