Case ID: so2d_729/html/0483-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BANCO LATINO INTERNATIONAL, Appellant, v. Juan Carlos PADIAL, Appellee.
    No. 98-2398.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 24, 1999.
    Rehearing Denied April 28, 1999.
    Miller, Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin, David S. Cohen and Joshua M. Flum ,Washington, D.C.; Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson and Jonathan Goodman, Miami, for appellant.
    Alvarez, Armas & Borron and J. Alfredo De Armas, Coral Gables, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s entry of partial final summary judgment in favor of Juan Carlos Padial where the terms of the underlying employment agreement were clear and unambiguous. As such, the trial court properly applied the contract’s definition of the term “consideration” when calculating Padial’s commissions.

Affirmed.