Case ID: sw2d_885/html/0729-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kurt M. HOWARD, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Janice Marie HOWARD, Respondent/Appellant.
    No. 64558.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Aug. 16, 1994.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 19, 1994.
    Lawrence G. Gillespie, Julie K. Morían, Eisen, Gillespie & Hilton, Webster Groves, for appellant.
    Jill A. Silverstein, Merle L. Silverstein, Rosenblum, Goldenhersh, Silverstein & Zafft, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Former wife appeals the denial of her motion to modify the maintenance provisions of a decree of dissolution. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).