Case ID: nys_121/html/1147-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SCHENCK, Appellant, v. SCHENCK, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    March 9, 1910.)
    Action by Frances E. Schenck against Eugene H. Schenck.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the plaintiff proved facts sufficient to establish a cause of action.

McLennan, P. J., and ROBSON, j., dissent.