Case ID: va_2/html/0668-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Terrell Executor of Holt v. Atkinson’s Executor.
    October Term, 1795.
    In Debt on a BUI of Exchange Profert Is Not Necessary.
    This was an appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Williamsburg rendered in favor of the appellee on a bill of exchange. Plea, nil debit.
    The only question was, whether profert of a bill of exchange in an action of debt were necessary? In this case it was not made.
    Wickham for the appellee contended,
    that it was not necessary, but that if it were, the statute of Jeofails cured it after verdict.
   The Court affirmed the judgment.