Case ID: pa_567/html/0613-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

790 A.2d 281
    Luis CLAUDIO and Sexta Claudio, Individually and as His Wife, Respondents, v. DEAN MACHINE COMPANY, Incorporated; Burton Industries, American Steel Line, Inc.; North American Brass, Inc.; and Hannum Electric Co. Petition of Dean Machine Company, Inc.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Feb. 12, 2002.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of February 2002, WE GRANT the Petition for Allowance of Appeal LIMITED to the following issue:

Whether the trial court erred, pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 227.1, by: (1) conducting a post-trial evidentiary hearing; and (2) granting post-trial relief when the court indicated that the error before or during trial was attributable to Appellees?