Case ID: ad_169/html/0919-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Moses Packard and Nathan J. Packard, Respondents, v. Richard Lawler, Appellant.
    Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office onljthe 23d day of February, 1915.
   Per Curiam:

It appears in this case that the whole transaction took place in the city of Syracuse, Onondaga county. The note was dated there, was payable there, and the loan was made to the defendant, who resides there, and if the transaction was usurious, it was the result of an agreement made there. We think this action should be tried where the whole transaction occurred. The order, therefore, is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to transfer the place of trial to Onondaga county granted. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars cests and disbursements, and motion granted. .