Case ID: so2d_220/html/0001-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HAYNES PAINTING & DECORATING and Phoenix Assurance Company, Petitioners, v. Lora MOSLEY and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
    No. 38168.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    March 12, 1969.
    Rehearing Denied March 31, 1969.
    Walsh & Dolan, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioners.
    Harry Goodmark and Plisco & Zalla, West Palm Beach, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari, we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 4, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petitions, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition for certiorari is therefore denied.

Attorneys’ fees in the amount of $250.00 are awarded to respondent-Lora Mosley’s attorneys.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur.