Case ID: f_93/html/0989-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PARDEE, Circuit Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SARRAZIN v. AUGUSTUS CRAFT CO., Limited.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    April 11, 1899.)
    No. 789.
    In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
    W. R. Stringfellow and T. M. Gill, for plaintiff in error.
    E. H. Farrar, E. B. Kruttschnitt, B. F. Jonas, and Hewes T. Gurley, for defendant in error.
    Before PARDEE, Mc-CORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.
   PARDEE, Circuit Judge.

The pleadings, rulings, hills of exception, assignments of error, and the questions involved in this case are precisely the same as in Sarrazin v. Tobacco Co. (just decided) 93 Fed. 624, and, for the reasons given in the opinion in that case, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.