Case ID: cust-ct_1/html/0454-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 39678.
    Protests 979860, etc., of Lord & Taylor et al. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that certain items consist of articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. As to these the claim at 60 percent under paragraph 1430 was sustained. Embroideries similar to those involved in Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) were held dutiable at-75 percent under paragraph 1430.