Case ID: nw2d_539/html/0392-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "/s/ Alan C. Page Alan C. Page Associate Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Leland M. HOAGLAND, petitioner, Appellant, v. STATE of Minnesota, Respondent.
    No. C3-95-563.
    Supreme Court of Minnesota.
    Nov. 2, 1995.
    Mark D. Nyvold, Special Assistant State Public Defender, St. Paul, for Appellant.
    Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Minnesota Attorney General, St. Paul, Michael 0. Freeman, Hennepin County Attorney, Beverly J. Wolfe, Assistant County Attorney, Minneapolis, for Respondent.
   ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order of the district court dated March 2,1995, denying defendant, Leland M. Hoagland, a new trial after a remand hearing pursuant to Hoagland v. State, 518 N.W.2d 531 (Minn. 1994) be, and the same is, affirmed. The trial court on remand concluded, on the basis of detailed findings, that the state had met its burden of proving that the state would be unduly prejudiced by having to retry the case. Affirmed.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alan C. Page Alan C. Page Associate Justice