Case ID: f-appx_83/html/0238-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michel WITHERS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-50136.
    D.C. No. CR-97-01085-R-01.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 8, 2003.
    
    Decided Dec. 16, 2003.
    Ronald L. Cheng, Christopher M. Bran-win, USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Michel Withers, pro se, Adelanto, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Federal prisoner Michel Withers appeals pro se the denial of his motion for production of wiretap orders and affidavits. We lack jurisdiction to review this non-appealable order. Cf. 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.