Case ID: f-appx_227/html/0709-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wayne Neal JENKINS, Defendant-Petitioner.
    No. 06-35478.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 16, 2007.
    Filed April 20, 2007.
    Leslie K. Baker, Esq., United States Attorney’s Office, Eugene, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Wane Neal Jenkins, Sheridan, OR, pro se.
    Craig J. Gabriel, Esq., Ransom & Blackmon, LLP, Portland, OR, for Defendant-Petitioner.
    Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Wayne Neal Jenkins appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his 360-month sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Jenkins contends that United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), applies retroactively on collateral review and entitles him to relief. These contentions are foreclosed by this court’s decision in United States v. Cruz, 423 F.3d 1119, 1120-21 (9th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S. Ct. 1181, 163 L.Ed.2d 1138 (2006).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.