Case ID: ga-app_21/html/0653-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Beoyx.es, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

9166.
    Madden & Sons v. Beckham.
    Decided January 22, 1918.
    Action for damages; from Pike superior court — Judge Searcy. July 21, 1917. .
    The error assigned in the bill of exceptions is the overruling of a motion for a new trial, the grounds of which are not stated. The motion for a new trial was not sent up, and was not specified as a part of the record material to an understanding of the ease.
    ’ E. F. Dupree, for. plaintiffs in error. Bedding & Lester, contra.
   Beoyx.es, P. J.

1. No assignment of error having been made upon the direction of a verdict in this case, the Court of Appeals has no authority to decide whether the trial judge erred in so directing. Dickenson v. Stults, 120 Ga. 632 (48 S. E. 173); Arnold v. Ragan, 5 Ga. App. 254 (62 S. E. 1052).

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the judgment refusing to grant a new trial must be

Affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, J.J., concur.