Case ID: so2d_431/html/0543-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte Roy E. COOPER. (In re Roy E. COOPER v. KEN HILTON FORD SALES, INC.)
    82-154.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    April 22, 1983.
    Edward L. Ramsey, Birmingham, for petitioner.
    Robert L. Williams of Norman, Fitzpatrick & Wood, Birmingham, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Petition for writ of mandamus is denied. By denying Petitioner extraordinary relief by way of writ of mandamus, we are not to be understood as prejudicing Petitioner’s right to seek whatever other equitable relief, if any, to which Petitioner may be entitled by way of independent action.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.