Case ID: blume-sup-ct-trans_5/html/0087-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WILLIAM BUCKLEN and JAMES BUCKLIN versus JOHN H. CARPENTER, CONRAD TEN EYCK, THOMAS CHADWICK, JOHNSON KILBOURN, and JOSEPH YOUNG.
   Journal Entries (1828): Journal 4: (1) Writ of injunction ordered issued *p. 163; (2) motion to quash subpoena and to dissolve injunction *p. 175; (3) return set aside, injunction dissolved, bill dismissed *p. 218.

Papers in File: (i) Bill of complaint; (2) fiat for injunction; (3) injunction bond; (4) precipe for writ of subpoena; (5) writ of subpoena and return; (6) answer (incomplete) of John H. Carpenter; (7) motion to quash subpoena and to dissolve injunction; (8) writ of fi. fa. for costs, return.

Chancery Case 97 of 1828.