Case ID: ind-app_116/html/0620-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Flanagan, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Leighty et al. v. Renbarger
    [No. 17,469.
    Filed March 28, 1946.
    Rehearing Denied April 26, 1946. Transfer Denied May 28, 1946.]
    
      
      Dan M. Link, of Auburn, and Wm, J. Hull, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellants.
    
      Mountz & Mountz, of Garrett, for appellee.
   Flanagan, C. J.

Appellee has filed herein a motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground that.no question for review has been presented.

The error relied upon for reversal is the overruling of. appellants’ motion for a new trial which attempts to .challenge the sufficiency of the evidence and the legality of the decision. But appellants’ brief does not contain the pleadings, the motion for a new trial, the judgment, nor a statement of the evidence in narrative form. No question is therefore presented. Rule 2-17, Rules of Supreme Court.

Appeal dismissed.

Norn — Reported in 65 N. E. (2d) 637.