Case ID: ala-app_24/html/0630-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SAMFORD, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(136 So. 926)
    Comer DOWDY v. STATE.
    8 Div. 396.
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    Aug. 4, 1931.
    Rehearing Denied Oct. 6, 1931.
    F. S. Parnell, of Florence, for appellant.
    Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Att.y. Gen., for the State.
   SAMFORD, J.

We have read the record in this case and considered the exceptions reserved on the trial. The evidence was in sharp conflict, making the question of guilt one of fact for the jury.

The cause was submitted in this court on motion of the Attorney General, without brief or argument by appellant supporting exceptions reserved on the trial and set out in the record, or pointing out wherein the record is supposed to show error prejudicial to appellant.

We have examined the record for errors, as the statute requires, and find none prejudicial to defendant. Without promulgating an opinion, which we deem unnecessary, the judgment is affirmed. Simmons v. State, 17 Ala. App. 153, 82 So. 643; Grisham v. State, 17 Ala. App. 153, 82 So. 643.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.