Case ID: misc_190/html/0695-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hyman Portnow, Landlord, Appellant, v. “ Frank ” La Rosa et al., Tenants, Respondents.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    January 14, 1948.
    
      Moses Block for appellant.
    
      Anthony W. Fiero for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

Memorandum The petition is defective inasmuch as it describes the petitioner as the owner in fee of the premises when admittedly he is a co-owner. Section 1415 of the Civil Practice Act requires that he and his co-owner should join in the petition and state their interests in the premises. (Lucchesi v. Johnson, N. Y. L. J., Dec. 14, 1946, p. 1749, col. 6.)

The final order should be unanimously modified on the law by inserting a provision that the dismissal of the proceeding was without prejudice, and, as so modified, the final order should be affirmed, without costs.

MacCrate, Steinbrink and Fennelly, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.