Case ID: f-cas_9/html/0973-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "THE COURT", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Case No. 5,144.
    FRYE v. SCOTT.
    [3 Cranch, C. C. 294.] 
    
    Circuit Court, District of Columbia.
    May Term, 1828.
    Mr. Worthington and R. P. Dunlop,
    Mr. Hellen, contra.
    
      
       [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.)
    
   THE COURT

(nem. con.) overruled the-objections, saying that it was not necessary that the appointment of Perley, by the two other arbitrators should be in writing; nor that the award should state that the two had disagreed before they appointed Perley. These facts may be proved by parol. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.