Case ID: so2d_774/html/0760-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anilus BELHOMME, Appellant, v. Gisleine BERTRAND, Appellee.
    No. 3D00-2153.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 22, 2000.
    Langbein & Langbein and Evan J. Langbein, Aventura; David C. Miller; James M. Schiff, Miami, for appellant.
    Brian R. Hersh and Amie Tamayo, Miami, for appellee.
    Before GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

Because the plaintiff met her burden of showing the essential elements necessary for the issuance of a temporary injunction, namely, “a clear legal right or interest in the subject matter of the suit, the likelihood of irreparable harm because of the unavailability of an adequate remedy at law, and a substantial likelihood of success of the merits,” Oxford Int’l Bank & Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 374 So.2d 54, 56 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), we affirm the trial court’s order.

Affirmed.