Case ID: nh_60/html/0469-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Doe, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Elsher v. Hughes.
    The form of action may be changed by amendment, and the amendment may be made after a verdict for the plaintiff, without a new trial, when the verdict could not have been affected by the amendment if it had been made before the trial.
    Trespass, qu. el. Verdict for the plaintiff.
    
      Dodge and Copeland, for the defendant.
    
      T. J. Smith and Worcester, for the plaintiff.
   Doe, C. J.

The plaintiff is entitled to damages for the defendant’s use and occupation of the plaintiff’s store. The measure of -damages given to the jury was the same as would have been given in assumpsit. Whether, upon the evidence in the case, the value of the occupation should be recovered in trespass or assumpsit, is .an unnecessary question. Merrill v. Perkins, 59 N. H. 343. When the plaintiff amends the declaration by adding a common count in assumpsit, there will be

Judgment on the verdict.

Blodgett, J., did not sit: the others concurred.