Case ID: ga-app_37/html/0476-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

18473.
    Thornton v. Mundy.
    Appeal and Error, 4 C. J. p. 864, n. 33, 34.
   Broyles, C. J.

1. None of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial show cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

2. Under all the facts of the case'as disálosed by the record, this court can not hold that there was no evidence authorizing the verdict, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial court, and no reversible error of law appearing, this court is without authority to interfere. Judgment affirmed.

Decided December 13, 1927.

Complaint; from Clayton superior court—Judge Hutcheson. July 15, 1927.

J. J. Barge, for plaintiff in error. W. M. Wright, contra.

Luloe and BloodwortTi, JJ., eoneur.