Case ID: so2d_635/html/1050-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronald HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 93-2763.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    April 27, 1994.
    
      Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Joseph R. Chloupek, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carol Cobourn Asbury, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We agree with the state, and the appellant concedes, that since the records of this court reflect that no mandate was issued in the earlier appeal, the resen-tencing imposed while the case was pending in the supreme court was a nullity.

ANSTEAD, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.