Case ID: f-appx_171/html/0175-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Israel ARREOLA-CONTRERAS, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 05-30330.
    D.C. No. CR-03-60082-HO.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 8, 2006.
    
    Decided March 15, 2006.
    Stephen Gunnels, Eugene, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    
      Bryan E. Lessley, Esq., Office of the Federal Public Defender, Eugene, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before CANBY, BEEZER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Israel Arreola-Contreras appeals from the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry of a deported alien, possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, and felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and 18 U.S.C. § 922(g); respectively.

We conclude that the appeal waiver is valid and we dismiss. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179,1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered into knowingly and voluntarily); see also United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that the changes in sentencing law imposed by United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), did not render waiver of appeal involuntary and unknowing).

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.