Case ID: so3d_221/html/0995-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "GREMILLION, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Derrick DEAN, M.D. v. ST. MARY EMERGENCY GROUP, LLC, et. al.
    16-1064
    17-66
    Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
    05/17/2017
    Regél Louis Bisso, Robert G. Miller, Jr., Bisso & Miller, 3925 N.I-10 Service Road, West, #227, Metairie, LA 70002, (504) 830-3401, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT: Derrick Dean, ’M.D.
    
      R. Joshua Koch, Jr., Koch & Schmidt, LLC, 650 Poydras Street, Suite 2660, New Orleans, LA 70130, (504) 208-9040, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT: Derrick Dean, M.D.
    James L. Pate, Kenneth W. Jones, Sr., Neuner Pate, P.O. Drawer 52828, Lafayette, LA 70505-2828, (337) 237-7000, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Westport Insurance Corporation
    Celia R. Cangelosi, Attorney at Law, 5551 Corporate Boulevard, #101, Baton Rouge, LA 70821-3036, (225) 231-1453, COUNSEL FOR OTHER APPLICANT: Louisiana Board of Pharmacy
    James Huey, Gibson Stacy Nicole Kennedy, Allen & Gooch, P. O. Box 81129, Lafayette, LA 70598-1129 (337) 291-1000, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS/ RESPONDENTS: The Gachassin Law Firm, Julie Ann SLisa Eve Mayer
    Sara R. Buggs, NeunerPate, P. O. Drawer 52828, Lafayette, LA 70505-2828, (337) 237-7000, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Westport Insurance Corporation
    Court composed of Shannon J. Gremillion, John E. Conery, and David E. Chatelain, Judges.
    
    
      
      . Honorable David E. Chatelain participated in this decision by appointment of the Louisiana Supreme Court as Judge Pro Tempore.
    
   GREMILLION, Judge.

hThe Louisiana Board of Pharmacy (the Board) filed a supervisory writ in this matter. Thereafter, the Board filed an appeal in 17-66. Both sought the reversal of the trial court’s motion to compel the Board to provide information to the defendants-ap-pellees, the Gachassin Law Firm and Julie Ann Savoy (Gachassin). Gachassin filed a motion to dismiss the writ application, which we denied. We granted the writ application for the limited purpose of ordering the consolidation of the writ with the appeal. We affirm the trial court’s ruling as set forth in the opinion rendered in in 17-66.

WRIT CONSOLIDATED WITH APPEAL.