Case ID: fla_43/html/0140-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Newman D. Wainright as Administrator of the Estate of David L. Alvarez, Deceased Joseph G. Alvarez and William H. Rivers, Appellants, vs. Thomas V. Porter, Hellen A. Richard, J. M. Johns, J. L. Wynn, William T. Dixon and John B. Dixon, Partners as William T. Dixon & Bro.; E. P. Pinney and C. H. Johnson, Partners as Pinney & Johnson; Samuel J. Berry, J. Wisner and H. F. Lohman, Partners as Berry, Wisner & Lohman, and Frank D. LaLanne, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Frank D. LaLanne & Co., Appellees.
    Appellate Practice — -Consideration of case on abstract of record.
    Where a cause is submitted to the appellate court upon extracts of the record as prescribed by the rules of practice for the government of such court, and no exceptions to such abstracts are interposed they are thereby admitted to be true and correct; and, under the rules, the appellate court is required, in such a case, to consider and dispose of the cause upon such abstracts alone without reference to the transcript of the record; and if no error is made to appear by such abstracts the decree of the court below will be affirmed.
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County.
    
      Thomas E. Bugg and J. T. Wills for Appellants.
    No appearance for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

This cause coming on for final adjudication in its regular order on the docket and being submitted to the .court .upon abstracts of the record that are not excqited to and therefore admitted to be true and correct, which, under the rules, requires our consideration of ■ the case upon such abstracts alone without reference to the transcript of the record; and upon due consideration the court finds that no errors are made to appear by the said abstracts, it is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the decrees of the court below in said cause are hereby affirmed at the cost of the appellants.