Case ID: mcgrath_1/html/0972-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HOLTON vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Gratiot),
    No. 16392½.
   To require respondent to settle the testimony in a chancery cause.

Order to show cause denied June 22, 1897.

Relator filed a bill for divorce, an order pro confesso was entered, testimony taken and decree entered dismissing the bill.

Upon presentation of the testimony the court ordered that the testimony taken in a prior case between the same parties be included. Relator contends that said order is oppressive in that it involves an expense which he is unable to pay.