Case ID: ga-app_26/html/0116-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Stephens, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

10584.
    Ross v. Garraux, executor.
    Decided January 20, 1921.
    Motion for new trial; from city court of Atlanta — Judge Eeid. March 18, 1919.
    
      Hill & Adams, for plaintiff.
    
      James K. Warren, Brewster, Howell cG Heyman, for defendant.
   Stephens, J.

This court having held that the trial judge erred in dismissing the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial upon the ground that the movant had not presented for approval a brief of the evidence within the time allowed by law (Ross v. Garraux, 24 Ga. App. 601, 101 S. E. 700), and the Supreme Court on certiorari having reversed this judgment (Garraux v. Ross, 150 Ga. 645, 104 S. E. 907), the judgment of reversal originally rendered by this court must be vacated, and the judgment of the trial court affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., mid Sill, J., conew.