Case ID: sw3d_53/html/0167-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas E. WAGNER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. ED 78574.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    June 12, 2001.
    Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 9, 2001.
    Application for Transfer Denied Sept. 25, 2001.
    John E. Counts, Fenton, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon; Attorney General; Charissa L. Watson; Assistant Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, attorney for respondent.
    Before MARY K HOFF, Chief Judge and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, Judge and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas E. Wagner (appellant) appeals from the circuit court’s judgment sustaining the Director of Revenue’s revocation of the appellant’s driving privileges for the appellant’s refusal to submit to a “breath-alizer” test.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error is -without merit. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).