Case ID: sw3d_359/html/0129-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Stacy Renee KYLE, Appellant.
    No. WD 73733.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Dec. 27, 2011.
    Michael D. Arnold, Gallatin, MO, for appellant.
    Andrea B. Gibson, Gallatin, MO, for respondent.
    Before: ALOK AHUJA, P.J., and THOMAS H. NEWTON and JAMES E. WELSH, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Stacy Renee Kyle was a passenger in a vehicle that was stopped by a Highway Patrol officer for speeding. After the driver consented to a search, the officer recovered marijuana from the glove compartment. Kyle was convicted of possession of up to thirty-five grams of marijuana. She appeals, arguing that the officer’s testimony as to the driver’s statement of consent was inadmissible hearsay, and that the driver’s consent to search was ineffective, because it was given only after the stop should have legally concluded. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).