Case ID: so2d_481/html/0107-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stephen SLAWINSKI, Appellant, v. Angela SLAWINSKI, Appellee.
    No. 85-2812.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Jan. 15, 1986.
    Ernon N. Sidaway, III, Fort Pierce, for appellant.
    Richard A. Kupfer of Cone, Wagner, Nu-gent, Johnson, Roth & Romano, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Errol S. Willes, Fort Pierce, for appellee.
   ON MOTION TO REVIEW BOND

PER CURIAM.

The husband has filed a motion, pursuant to Rule 9.310(f), Fla.R.App.P., to review the amount of bond established by the trial court. In response, the wife has confessed error, admitting that the present dollar figure is too high. See generally Rule 9.310, Fla.R.App.P. Accordingly, the trial court’s bond determination is reversed and the cause is remanded for imposition of a more appropriate figure.

GLICKSTEIN, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.