Case ID: mass_421/html/1009-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lalit K. Parekh vs. Carlita Q. Parekh.
    January 11, 1996.
    
      Supreme Judicial Court,
    
    Appeal from order of single justice. Practice, Civil, Interlocutory appeal.
    The case was submitted on the papers filed, accompanied by a memorandum of law.
    
      David W. Rifkitt & Patrick Morgan for the plaintiff.
    
      Pamela Casey O’Brien for the defendant.
   This is a purported appeal under S.J.C. Rule 2:21, post 1303 (1995), from the denial pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, of relief from an order entered against the plaintiff appellant in a G. L. c. 209A proceeding. The appellant has omitted necessary papers from the record: a copy of the petition to the single justice and a copy of the docket in the county court. An order entered in a G. L. c. 209A proceeding is not an interlocutory order of the trial court subject to S.J.C. Rule 2:21. For the purposes of appeal in this case, S.J.C. Rule 2:21 is inapplicable. An appeal pursuant to the regular appellate process is the appropriate avenue for the appellant to pursue.

The court need take no action pursuant to S.J.C. Rule 2:21. The appellant may pursue his appeal according to the regular process.