Case ID: sw3d_90/html/0547-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Esten KIRBY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 80835.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Nov. 19, 2002.
    Mary Choi, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Esten Kirby, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. He contends his plea counsel’s erroneous advice and lack of advice induced him to plead guilty unknowingly and involuntarily.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).