Case ID: ad_204/html/0860-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Norman B. Harrington, Respondent, v. Hamilton B. Wills & Co., Ltd., Appellant.
   Motion to amend decision [See 203 App. Div. 878] denied, upon the ground that section 117 of the Civil Practice Act does not provide for a preclusion order in this case, and that the decision in MacDonald v. Wills & Co., Ltd. (199 App. Div. 902, 911) is not a precedent, for the reason that in that case there were affirmative allegations in the answer. 
      
      
        Sic. See Civ. Prac. Act, § 247.— [Rep.