Case ID: ad2d_158/html/0294-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Quintero, Appellant.
   Defendant’s challenge to the supplemental instruction, as well as defendant’s claims with respect to the prosecutor’s summation comments, are unpreserved as a matter of law (see, People v Atkinson, 141 AD2d 743 [2d Dept 1988]). Nor is there any indication that, with respect to the instruction, the court failed to comply with CPL 310.30 (see, People v Malloy, 55 NY2d 296, 301 [1982]) so as to warrant review in the interest of justice. Nor are the summation comments, although waived for review, so egregious as to have cumulatively denied defendant a fair trial warranting review in the interest of justice. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ross, Asch and Smith, JJ.