Case ID: ny_53/html/0647-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Peckham, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Petition of Henry Ellsworth to Vacate Assessment for Sewers, etc., in New York. In the Matter of the Petition of Edward H. Stead to Vacate Assessment for Sewers, etc, in New York.
    (Argued September 30, 1873 ;
    decided October 7, 1873.)
    Under the provisions of the act in relation to sewerage and drainage in the city of Mew York (chap. 381, Laws of 1865), the number and extent of the sewerage districts to be laid out, and the power to modify and change them, is entirely within the control and discretion of the Oroton Aqueduct Board. This court has no power to review that discretion, and it seems that no tribunal is vested with such power. (Andrews, J., dissenting.)
    These were applications to vacate assessments for sewers in One Hundred and Fifteenth, One Hundred and Sixteenth and One Hundred and Seventeenth streets, in the city of New York, between Third and Fourth avenues, and in One Hundred and Twenty-sixth street and Fourth avenue. The assessments were claimed by the petitioners to be void, because, as alleged, no general sewerage districts had been laid out, or maps or plans devised, before contracting for the work as required by section 1, chapter 381, Laws of 1865. Prior to the contract, maps embracing the particular sewers, and none others, had been made and adopted by the Croton Aqueduct Board, marked and described as “ District Map.” Subsequently a general map or plan of sewerage was adopted, extending over a large area and embracing these sewers. Held, as above stated.
    
      T. F. Neville for petitioners, appellants.
    
      D. J. Dean for Mayor, etc., respondents.
   Peckham, J.,

reads for affirmance.

All concur, except Andrews, J., dissenting, and Batallo, J., not voting.

Order affirmed.