Case ID: f-appx_380/html/0352-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond Douglas MASSENBURG, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-8080.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted May 20, 2010.
    Decided May 25, 2010.
    Raymond Douglas Massenburg, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    
      Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Douglas Massenburg, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion for reconsideration of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Massenburg, No. 3:97-cr-00003-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Sept. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.