Case ID: sw2d_832/html/0022-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert OSWALD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 60695.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    June 23, 1992.
    Jeannie Arterbum, St. Louis, for appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Rudolph R. Rhodes, IV, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Robert Oswald, appeals from an order of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the transcript, legal file and the briefs of the parties and find that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As this court further finds that no precedential purpose would be served by a full opinion, we affirm the order of the circuit court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.