Case ID: f-appx_96/html/0922-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Perry E. THORNLEY, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Ruffus FLEMMING, Regional Director; Hinckle, Chief Warden GRCC; Dugger, Corporal, Corrections Officer, GRCC, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 04-6604.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 13, 2004.
    Decided: May 20, 2004.
    Perry E. Thornley, Jr., Appellant pro se.
    William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Perry E. Thornley, Jr., appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Thornley v. Flemming, No. CA-03-419-3 (E.D.Va. Mar. 25, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED 
      
       The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).