Case ID: so2d_599/html/0779-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Americo ROSALES, Appellant, v. Elizabeth ROSALES, Appellee.
    No. 91-2820.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 16, 1992.
    Juan M. Bracete and Lilliana Torreh-Bayouth, Miami, for appellant.
    Richard A. Beiley, Miami, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The trial judge correctly sustained the appellee-mother’s exceptions to the general master’s “downward departure” from the child support guidelines. See § 61.30(2), Fla.Stat. (1991); Weinstein v. Steele, 590 So.2d 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Lau v. Lau, 407 So.2d 927 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (income of custodial parent’s new spouse not properly considered in determining noncustodial parent’s child support obligation); Montgomery v. Montgomery, 426 So.2d 1255 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) (same); Fried v. Fried, 375 So.2d 46 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979) (same); Schneider v. Schneider, 348 So.2d 612 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) (same).

Affirmed.