Case ID: njl_106/html/0566-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

EMANUEL DREYFUS, RESPONDENT, v. LUTZ COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Submitted October 26, 1928
    Decided May 20, 1929.
    For the respondent, Mervin Herzfeld.
    
    For the appellant, Kellogg & Chance.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court. '

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Paekee, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yah Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.