Case ID: so2d_602/html/0695-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PATTERSON, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Donald W. MULLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 91-01581.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Aug. 7, 1992.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PATTERSON, Judge.

The appellant raises two points oh appeal, and we affirm as to the first point. As to the second, we reverse and remand for resentencing in accordance with section 39.059(7)(c) and (d), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1990), pursuant to Croskey v. State, 601 So.2d 1326 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (en banc). Also, on remand, the trial court may impose conditions of probation which reasonably relate to the crimes committed or to the appellant’s rehabilitation. Rodriguez v. State, 378 So.2d 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

LEHAN, C.J., and RYDER, J., concur.