Case ID: so3d_227/html/0768-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Desiree Nicole BAILEY, the former wife, Appellant, v. Michael Andrew BAILEY, the former husband, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-453
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed October 16, 2017
    William S. Graessle and Jonathan W. Graessle of William S. Graessle, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.
    Lisa A. March of the Law Office of Lisa A. March, P.A., Jacksonville Beach, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

In this post-dissolution appeal, we agree with the former wife that the trial court erred in requiring the parties to equally split the responsibility of transportation for timesharing because that issue was not pled or tried by consent. Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the challenged order. In all other respects, we affirm the order.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR. 
      
      . Unlike the former wife, we do not read the order to modify the limitation on overnights embodied in the consent final judgment. Instead, as the former husband conceded in his brief, "he is still limited to 130 overnights."