Case ID: misc_46/html/0506-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dowling, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Annie C. Haley, Plaintiff, v. Anne Sheridan et al., Defendants.
    (Supreme Court, New York Special Term,
    March, 1905.)
    Real Property Law — Sections 7 and 294 — Mon-resident alien cannot inherit — L. 1897, ch. 593 — Effect of.
    Where a citizen of the United States dies intestate in this State seized of certain real estate therein, acquired by devise from her mother, leaving as her heirs at law an aunt and uncle on her mother’s side, and three cousins, heirs at law of a deceased uncle who was a brother of her mother, the share of the uncle who died a non-resident alien does not deseend to his daughter though, by the naturalization of her husband, she had become an American citizen before her father’s death, but the title thereto vested at once in the People of the State of Hew York.
    Sections 7 and 294 of the Seal Property Law (L. 1896, ch. ¡j-±7) considered and held not applicable, and the ’statutory provision (L. 1897, eh. 593) that “Any citizen of a state or nation which, by its laws, confers similar privileges on citizens of the United States, may take, acquire, hold and convey lands or real estate within this state, in the same manner and with like effect as if such person were, at the time, a citizen of the United States ”, held not to change the situation.
    The share of one of the cousins who died a citizen, unmarried and intestate, leaving as his only heirs at law a mother and two sisters, the other cousins and heirs at law of the intestate herein, descended to his sisters subject to the life estate of their mother.
    Action for partition. The opinion states the case.
    Marshall S. Marsden, for plaintiff.
    John J. Clancy, for defendants Kerr and Tully.
    Julius M. Mayer, Attorney-General (Lewis Ogden O’Brien, of counsel), for defendant State of New York.
   Dowling, J.

Mary McArdle, a citizen of the United Stares, died intestate, in the county of Hew York, Hovember 5, 1903, seized of certain real estate therein which she had acquired by devise from her mother, Rose Monaghan. Her heirs-at-law were Anne Sheridan, a sister of Rose Monaghan, and decedent’s aunt; James Tully, decedent’s uncle, a brother of Rose Monaghan; and Matthew Tully, Maria Tully and Annie C. Haley, cousins, being the lieirs-at-law of Michael Tully, decedent’s deceased uncle, a brother of Rose Monaghan. Matthew Tully thereafter died, unmarried and intestate, leaving his mother, Mary Tully, and his sisters aforesaid, Maria Tully and Annie 0. Haley, his only heirs-at-law. James Tully, the uncle of decedent, a nonresident alien, died intestate in Ireland about April 9, 1904, leaving him surviving his widow, Mary Kerr, and his daughter, Margaret Kerr. James Tully, a citizen of the Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, had never filed any declaration of his intention to become an American citizen. His daughter, Margaret Kerr, however, had become an American citizen December 11, 1903, by the naturalization of her husband. Upon the death of Mary McArdle, intestate, her real estate descended as follows: One-tliird to Anne Sheridan, one-third to James Tully, and one-third to Matthew Tully, Maria Tully and Annie C. Haley in equal shares. R. S., Pt. II, chap. II, § 12. Upon the death of Matthew Tully, a citizen, his one-ninth 'share descended, in equal shares, to his two sisters, Maria Tully and Annie 0. Haley, subject to the life estate of his mother, Mary Tully. R. S., Pt. II, chap. II, § 6. James Tully never took any steps to become a citizen of the Hnited States, nor did he ever make or file the deposition required by section 4 of the Real Property Law. His widow, therefore, upon his death, did not become entitled to dower in his property; which would only follow his citizenship, or his death after filing the deposition and before his admission to citizenship. Real Prop. Law, § 5. An alien having no inheritable blood, upon the death of James Tully, his one-third share vested at once in the People of the State of Hew York. Const. N. Y., art. 1, § 11. Chapter 547 of the Laws of 1896 (Real Prop. Law), whereof section 7 is quoted, as authorizing the descent of title to Margaret Kerr, is only a substantial re-enactment of the provisions of many similar prior acts, such as chapter 49, Laws of 1802 (§ 3) ; chapter 123, Laws of 1807 (§ 9); 1 Rev. Staff, 719 (§ 9); chapter 115, Laws of 1845 (§ 9); chapter 576, Laws of 1857 (§ 1) ; .chapter 513, Laws of 1868 (§ 1) ; chapter 141, Laws of 1872 (§§ 1, 2) ; chapter 358, Laws of 1872 (§ 1) ; chapter 336, Laws of 1875 (§ 1) ; chapter 111, Laws of 1877 (§1). Its only effect is to relieve those who take title from alien purchasers of a subsequent liability to be divested of such title by the State in an action of ejectment, in tho nature of an inquest of office. Fowler Real Prop. Law (2d ed.), 126. Hor does section 294 of the Real Property Law affect the status of defendant Margaret Kerr. It applies to the case of a person capable of inheriting who," answering the description of heir, would have to trace part of his ancestry through an alien ancestor. This is not such a case. Ho one here is capable of inheriting from James Tully, because, as a nonresident alien, he can, in -the view of the law, have no inheritable blood nor transmit by hereditary descent. Hor does chapter 593 of the Laws of 1897 change the situation here. Its provision is: Any citizen of a state or nation which by its laws, confers similar privileges on citizens of the United States, may take, acquire, hold and convey lands or real estate within this state in the same manner and with like effect as if such person were, at the time, a citizen of the. United States.” James Tully having been a citizen of great Britain and Ireland, proof has been made of the English statute, chapter 14, 33 and 34 Victoria (May 12, 1810), in part as follows: “Section 2. Real and personal property of every description may be taken, acquired, held and disposed of by an alien in the same manner in all respects as by a natural-born British subject; and a title to real and personal property of every description may be derived through, Rom, or in succession to an alien, in the same manner in all respects as through, from, or in succession to a natural-born British subject.” It thus appears that the English statute goes much further than our own, and not only authorizes an alien to take, acquire, hold and dispose of real and personal property, but vests him with heritable blood, and enables him to transmit by hereditary descent. This our statute does not do; nor does it insure to aliens residing in this State reciprocal rights and privileges to those which our citizens enjoy in the foreign nation, the alien’s birthplace. It expressly by its terms only confers the right upon an alien to take, acquire, hold and convey lands in this State, and does not confer upon him the privileges of hereditability contained in the latter part of the English statute. Inheritance by descent does not follow as a necessary right upon the power' to take, acquire, hold and convey. The shares of the parties hereto in the premises in question are, therefore, as follows, subject to the mortgage thereon and payment of the transfer tax: Anne Sheridan, one-third; Maria Tully, one-sixth, and Annie C. Haley, one-sixth, whereof one-third of the share so held by said Tully and Haley, or one-eighteenth share of the whole, held by each, is subject to the life estate therein of Mary Tully; the People of the State of Hew York, one-third. Settle findings and judgment* accordingly on notice.

Judgment accordingly.