Case ID: kan_80/html/0795-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frank Erath v. W. M. Glenn.
    No. 15,947.
    Error from Greeley district court; Charles E. Lob-dell, judge.
    Opinion filed April 10, 1909.
    Affirmed.
    
      D. R. Beckstrom, for the plaintiff in error.
    
      George A. Kline, for the defendant in error.
   Per Curiam:

The point of contention here is, Was there evidence to sustain the finding of the trial court that the defendant had notice of the commencement and pendency of the original action? It appears from the record that there was at least sufficient evidence to uphold the finding. The judgment is affirmed.