Case ID: f-appx_628/html/0183-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary ROWE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOLDSBORO WAYNE TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 15-1742.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 30, 2015.
    Decided: Jan. 7, 2016.
    Mary Rowe, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Craven Adams, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before KEENAN, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mary Rowe appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Goldsboro Wayne Transportation Authority on her claim of retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp.2015). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rowe v. Goldsboro Wayne Transp. Auth., No. 5:13-cv-00754-F, 2015 WL 3650086 (E.D.N.C. June 11, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.