Case ID: sw_194/html/1157-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HODGES, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

YATES MERCANTILE CO. et al. v. FARMERS’ GUARANTY STATE BANK OF JACKSONVILLE.
    (No. 1750.)
    (Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.
    Feb. 22, 1917.)
    Appeal and Ebbor ®=c499(4), 501(4) — Scope op Review — Record—Preservation op Exceptions.
    Where the record contains no objections nor exceptions to the charge, assignments of error predicated upon the giving thereof cannot be considered.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig. §§ 2298, 2304.]
    Appeal from District Court, Cherokee County; L. D. Guinn, Judge.
    Action by the Farmers’ Guaranty State Bank of Jacksonville against the Yates Mercantile Company and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.
    Affirmed.
    W. J. Townsend, Jr., of Jacksonville, for appellants. B. D. Dashiell, of Jacksonville, and Perkins & Perkins, of Rusk, for appel-lee.
   HODGES, J.

This suit was filed in the court below by the appellee against the appellants, seeking a judgment for §100 with interest and attorney’s fees on a promissory note. The note was executed by E. T. Yates and W. B. Yates as principals, and its payment was guaranteed by the appellants and other parties who did not appeal. At the conclusion of the evidence, the court below gave a peremptory instruction directing a verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount sued for. The assignments of error present different reasons why that instruction should not have been given.

The record contains no objections nor exceptions to the charge, and for that reason the assignments cannot be considered. Pearce v. Supreme Lodge, 190 S. W. 1156; Thorne v. Dashiell, 189 S. W. 987; Ry. Co. v. Wheat, 173 S. W. 974; Needham v. Cooney, 173 S. W. 979; Ry. Co. v. Feldman, 170 S. W. 133; Donaldson v. McElroy, 184 S. W. 1100; Commonwealth, etc., v. Bryant, 185 S. W. 97,9; McCall v. Roemer, 186 S. W. 409.

The judgment will be affirmed.

WILLSON, C. J., did not sit in this case.