Case ID: f-appx_393/html/0506-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ascension HERNANDEZ-PEREZ, aka Jose Asuncion Hernandez, aka Jose Ascencion Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-50321.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted June 10, 2010.
    Filed Aug. 27, 2010.
    Robert Andre Rabbani, Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, United States Attorney Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.
    Kim Savo, Esquire, Kathryn Ann Young, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge, and BENNETT, District Judge.
    
    
      
       The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Ascension Hernandez-Perez failed to show any prejudice from the district court’s failure to comply with Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule S2(i)(l)(A). See United States v. Davila-Escovedo, 36 F.3d 840, 844 (9th Cir.1994). Therefore, any error was harmless. See United States v. Soltero, 510 F.3d 858, 863 (9th Cir.2007).

The district court’s addition of the two § 4Al.l(d) points brought his total criminal history from ten to twelve, but did not change his criminal history category of V, and thus resulted in the same Guidelines sentencing range. See U.S.S.G. Ch. 5, Pt. A. Because this was a “fast track” plea agreement, any error was harmless. See United States v. Cruz-Gramajo, 570 F.3d 1162, 1166 n. 3 (9th Cir.2009).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.