Case ID: ga_143/html/0552-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Hill, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LaFollette Iron Company v. Wiley.
    June 22, 1915.
    Action for damages. Before Judge Fite. Bartow superior court. July 24, 1914.
    
      Neel & Neel, for plaintiff in error.
    
      B. B. Arnold and Colquitt & Conyers, contra.
   Hill, J.

1. The requests to charge, so far as pertinent, were covered by the general charge.

2. While certain portions of the charges complained of were not entirely accurate, they furnish no ground for a new trial.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.