Case ID: ny_6/html/0467-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

*Overbagh et al. v. Patrie.
    Appeal from the general term of the Supreme Court, in the third district, where a verdict in favor of the plaintiff had been set aside, and a new trial granted. (Reported below, 8 Barb. 28.)
    This was an ejectment for a farm in Coeymans, in the county of Albany, which the plaintiffs claimed in fee. The question presented was the same as that decided in De Peyster v. Michael. There was a verdict, at the circuit, in favor of the plaintiffs, which was set aside by the court at general term, on a motion for a new trial; whereupon, the plaintiffs appealed to this court.
    
      Stevens, for the plaintiff.
    
      Taber, for the defendant.
   Per Curiam.

— Judgment affirmed, for the reasons given in De Peyster v. Michael.