Case ID: f-appx_624/html/0092-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel Lee KELLEY, Jr., a/k/a Little Boot, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-7184.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 30, 2015.
    Decided: Dec. 4, 2015.
    Samuel Lee Kelley, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. James Bradsher, Seth Morgan Wood, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Lee Kelley, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Kelley, No. 7:10-cr-00099-D-1 (E.D.N.C. July 9, 2015); see United States v. Black, 737 F.3d 280, 286 (4th Cir.2013) (finding that Black was not eligible for § 3582(c)(2) sentence reduction where he was sentenced to a mandatory minimum because “his sentence was not based on ‘a sentencing range’ that the Sentencing Commission subsequently lowered”). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.