Case ID: ga_92/html/0572-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mitchell et al. v. Mitchell, executor, et al.
    
    There was no abuse of discretion in granting a temporary injunction.
    July 24, 1893.
    Equitable petition. Before Judge Henry. Eloyd county. At chambers, February 1, 1893.
    The petition prayed that the court settle, by decree, whether defendants were entitled to a second and third year’s support, and the amount thereof, and how certain lands should be partitioned; that an account of the executor be taken to ascertain the assets and liabilities of the estate, and the liability of the legatees; for direction to the executor, general relief, etc. It was further prayed, that defendants be enjoined from prosecuting their applications for second and third year’s support, from hindering and delaying the executor in winding up the estate, and from interfering with its administration. The court granted the injunction as prayed, and ordered that an application made by the executor for sale of the lands be suspended until the hearing before a jury. ■ It is unnecessary to report the case further.
    Dabney & Eouché and J. S. Eouché, for plaintiffs in error. J. Branham, contra.
    
   Judgment affirmed.