Case ID: ga_166/html/0849-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Pirkle v. Pirkle.
    This case came before the court for decision by a full bench; and the Justices being equally divided in opinion, Russell, C. J., and Hill and Hines, JJ., being in favor of affirmance of the judgment granting an interlocutory injunction, and Beck, P. J., and Atkinson and Gilbert, JJ., being in favor of a reversal, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed by operation of law.
    No. 6303.
    September 12, 1928.
    'Petition for injunction. Before Judge Stark. Barrow superior court. September 24, 1927.
    
      J. G. Pratt, for plaintiff. B. E. Kimball, for defendant.