Case ID: ad2d_279/html/0590-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jimmy Hilliard, Appellant.
    [719 NYS2d 600]
   Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D. Friedman, J.), rendered June 18, 1997, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that certain remarks made by the prosecutor during summation were improper is unpreserved for appellate review since he raised only general objections to the challenged remarks, did not request curative instructions when his objections were sustained, and did not move for a mistrial (see, People v Nuccie, 57 NY2d 818; People v Davis, 277 AD2d 248 [case No. 1]; People v Feliciano, 254 AD2d 496; People v Oreckinto, 253 AD2d 896; People v Scotti, 220 AD2d 543). In any event, most of the challenged remarks either constituted fair comment, or were made in response to the defense counsel’s arguments on summation, and none was so prejudicial as to require reversal (see, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396; People v Davis, supra; People v Jones, 255 AD2d 600; People v Feliciano, supra). Krausman, J. P., Luciano, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.