Case ID: f-appx_605/html/0208-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Deonza Lamar CARMICHAEL, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 14-6205.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 28, 2015.
    Decided: June 4, 2015.
    Deonza Lamar Carmichael, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Deonza Lamar Carmichael appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carmichael v. United States, No. 5:08-cr-00229-FL-2; 5:12-cv-00288-FL, 2014 WL 495437 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 6, 2014); see also United States v. Foote, 784 F.3d 931 (4th Cir.2015), petition for cert. filed (May 12, 2015) (No. 14-9792). We deny Carmichael’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED. '