Case ID: so2d_828/html/1053-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David Chappelle WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 2D02-2502.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Oct. 16, 2002.
   PER CURIAM.

David C. Williams challenges the trial court’s order summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm. In his motion, Williams alleged that his plea was involuntary because defense counsel affirmatively misadvised him that these convictions could not be used in the future as prior offenses for sentencing purposes. In Stansel v. State, 825 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), we held that this claim is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion. We certify the same question that we certified in Stansel.

Affirmed.

PARKER, STRINGER and DAVIS, JJ, concur.