Case ID: so2d_568/html/0976-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Raul F. VERGARA, Appellant, v. Stephen H. BUTTER, Appellee.
    No. 90-1029.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 9, 1990.
    Rehearing Denied Nov. 20, 1990.
    Raul F. Vergara, in pro. per.
    Stephen H. Butter, in pro. per.
    Before NESBITT, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Raul Vergara, plaintiff below, appeals a final order dismissing his second amended complaint with prejudice. After review of the briefs and record herein, we concur with the trial court that the second amended complaint did not state a cause of action, see Nickolauson v. Rhyne, 529 So.2d 365 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), and that if any cause of action did exist, it would be barred by the statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4), Fla.Stat. (1989). The order under review is therefore affirmed.