Case ID: nj-eq_119/html/0541-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ray Mischne, complainant-appellant, v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, defendant-respondent.
    [Decided January 31st, 1936.]
    
      
      Mr. Remsen Cowenhoven and Mr. Louis L. Hendler, for the complainant-appellant.
    
      Messrs. Bilder, Bilder & Kauffman, for the defendantrespondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 116 N. J. Eq. 305 (under the name of Nischne v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.).

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 12.

For reversal—None.