Case ID: ny-super-ct_54/html/0554-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James A. Deering, Appellant, v. Sarah M. Starr, Respondent.
    Decided December 30, 1886.
    Appeal by plaintiff from judgment and from order denying motion for new trial, made upon the minutes. Lewis Sanders, for appellant, Albert Matthews, for respondent.
    Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., Freedman and Ingraham, JJ.
   Per Curiam.

“Judgment- and order affirmed, with costs! An irregularity in the form of the judgment should be corrected. The judgment is as if a verdict had been directed. In fact, upon the trial the complaint was dismissed.”