Case ID: ga_173/html/0804-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Atkinson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rice et al. v. Rice.
   Atkinson, J.

1. On the issues as to mental capacity of a grantor and undue influence exercised by the grantee in a suit to set aside certain deeds the following evidence'was admissible: “And he [A. J. Rice Sr.] seemed to be suffering from almost a complete loss of memory; and when he would make himself understood at all, his utterances and the thoughts he seemed to be trying to convey indicated a complete loss of mental control.”

No. 8537.

November 13, 1931.

2. On the conflicting evidence the judge did not err, after the grant of a nonsuit, in revoking the order of nonsuit at the same term and in reinstating the ease. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Copeland & Dulces, for plaintiffs in error.

W. E. Perry and Liltle & Dickerson, contra.