Case ID: njl_94/html/0566-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. STEPHEN CARRIGAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued March 4, 1920
    Decided June 14, 1920.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 93 N. J. L. 268.
    For the defendant in error, J. Henry Harrison.
    
    For the plaintiff in error, Andrew Van Blarcom.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—Swayze, Trenci-iard, Bergen, IIeppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 7.

For reversal—Parker, Kalisch, White, Taylor, JJ. 4.