Case ID: f-appx_83/html/0220-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Khaled EL-JASSEM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION; Al Herrera, Warden, Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 02-56862.
    D.C. No. CV-01-05579-CAS.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 8, 2003.
    
    Decided Dec. 15, 2003.
    Khaled El-Jassem, pro se, Pollock, LA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
    Janna B. Sidley, Esq., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, Joey L. Blanch, Esq., USR-U.S. Attorney’s Office, Riverside, CA, for Respondent-Appel-lee.
    Before GOODWIN, WALLACE and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Khaled El-Jassem, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition and dismissing the action with prejudice. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo a district court’s denial of a habeas corpus petition, Benny v. United States Parole Comm’n, 295 F.3d 977, 981 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, adopted by the district court on October 9, 2002.

We also conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying El-Jassem’s two requests for counsel. See Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir.1983).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.