Case ID: tex_119/html/0448-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam :", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Adolph Gold et al. v. O. F. Keene.
    Application No. 17620.
    Decided October 29, 1930.
    (31 S. W., 2d Series, 1071.)
    
      
      Cunningham, Moursund & Johnson, for petitioner,
    cited: Colt & Co. v. Head, 292 S. W., 198; Winters v. Coward, 174 S. W., 940; Gustafson v. American Land Co., 234 S. W., 245; Lay v. Midland Farms Co., 8 S. W. (2d), 230; Hallwood Cash Register Co. v. Berry, 80 S. W., 857; Waugh v. Hudson, 159 S. W., 893; Luckenbach v. Thomas, 166 S. W., 99; Dalton Adding Machine Sales Co. v. Wicks, 283 S. W., 642; Black on Rescission and Cancellation, Secs. 590-594 and 596; Wells v. Houston, 67 S. W., 584; Russell v. Industrial Transportation Co., 113 Texas, 440, 258 S. W., 462; American Rio Grande Land & Irrig. Co. v. Bellman, 272 S. W., 550; Kahn v. Kahn, 94 Texas, 114; Johnson v. Johnson, 147 S. W., 1167; Matheson v. C. B. Live Stock Co., 176 S. W., 734; Sullivan v. Schreiner, 222 S. W., 314.
   Per Curiam :

We approve the views expressed in Justice Smith’s concurring opinion.

The application for writ of error is accordingly refused.