Case ID: ohio-st-3d_50/html/0606-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Holmes, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Brauning, Appellee, v. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Appellant.
    [Cite as Brauning v. Cincinnati Gas & Elec. Co. (1990), 50 Ohio St. 3d 606.]
    (No. 89-494
    Submitted March 14, 1990
    Decided April 11, 1990.)
    
      Condit & Dressing Co., L.P.A., and John H. Metz, for appellee.
    
      Taft, Stettinius & Hollister and Gerald J. Rapien, for appellant.
    
      Sirkin, Piñales, Mezibov & Schwartz, Marc D. Mezibov and Edmund J. McKenna, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.
   This appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.

Holmes, J.,

dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.