Case ID: so2d_184/html/0167-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harry PEMPEY, Petitioner, v. BAYNARD, BARNES, BISCOE & YOPP FUNERAL HOME, INC., Phoenix Assurance Company of New York, and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents. BAYNARD, BARNES, BISCOE & YOPP FUNERAL HOME, INC., and Phoenix Assurance Company of New York, Cross-Petitioners, v. Harry PEMPEY, and the Florida Industrial Commission, Cross-Respondents.
    No. 34260.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    March 16, 1966.
    Meros & Wilkinson, St. Petersburg, for petitioner and cross-respondent.
    Roney & Beach, St. Petersburg, for respondents and cross-petitioners.
    Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and briefs and have heard oral argument by the parties. We find 'that in entering the order under attack the respondent Commission did not depart from the essential requirements of the law. Accordingly, the petition and the cross-petition for writ of certiorari are both denied. The petition for attorneys’ fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., THOMAS, ROBERTS and O’CONNELL, JJ., and TROW-BRIDGE, Circuit Judge, concur.