Case ID: nev_89/html/0024-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

EDWARD W. CHAUNCEY, Appellant, v. WARDEN, NEVADA STATE PRISON, Respondent.
    No. 6899
    January 18, 1973
    505 P.2d 292
    
      
      Gary A. Sheerin, State Public Defender, for Appellant.
    
      Robert List, Attorney General, and Robert A. Groves, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.
   OPINION

Per Curiam:

Convicted of first degree burglary in the Second Judicial District Court in 1962, Appellant Edward Chauncey, presently an inmate of the state prison, petitioned the First Judicial District Court for post-conviction habeas corpus relief. Upon the State’s motion, that court dismissed the petition, ruling that under NRS 177.315 a petition for post-conviction relief could only be brought in the district court wherein the defendant was convicted.

In Marshall v. Warden, 83 Nev. 442, 445 (1967), we held that notwithstanding the 1967 Post-Conviction Act (NRS 177.315) which gave post-conviction jurisdiction to the convicting district, traditional habeas corpus brought in the district court wherein the petitioner is incarcerated is still an available remedy.

Reversed.