Case ID: f_50/html/0072-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Lacombe, Circuit Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Herter Bros.
    
      (Circuit Court, S. D. New York.
    
    October 13, 1891.)
    At Law. Application to review a decision of the board of general appraisers as to the classification of certain marble blocks.
    
      W. Wickham Smith, for importers.
    
      James T. Van Rensselaer, for the United States.
   Lacombe, Circuit Judge.

In disposing of this case there is very little to add to the suggestions and construction of the statute which appear in the charge of Judge Coxe in the case of Baumgarten v. Magone, 50 Fed. Rep. 69, which of course is the law of this court until reversed, if it ever should be, by the court of appeals. These articles are manifestly small blocks of marble, and I cannot find in the testimony sufficient to warrant a conclusion that the general trade and commerce of this country has given a special trade meaning to the words “marble in blocks'1 other and different from its ordinary meaning in the speech of everyday life. It may be that it has, but there is not enough in this testimony to show that fact. For that reason, I shall reverse the decision of the appraisers, and direct the assessment of duty upon these articles as marble in blocks, at 65 per cent.