Case ID: ind_17/html/0226-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Buriss v. Tague.
    APPEAL from the Boone Common Pleas.
    
      O. S. Hamilton, for the appellant-.
    
      A. J. Boone, for the appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Suit by Tague against the appellant. Judgment for the plaintiff.

There is no exception in the record, except that taken to the overruling of a motion for a new trial.

It does not appear that any written reasons for a new trial were filed; none are contained in the record.

The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs.