Case ID: nys_96/html/1129-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HICKS, Respondent, v. EGGLESTON et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    December 29. 1905)
    Action by Willett Hicks against Lorin J. Eggleston and others.
   PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, on the ground that the facts disclosed by the motion papers clearly establish the right of the defendants to be apprised of the items which the plaintiff intends to assail as fraudulent upon the trial. Motion for bill of particulars granted, with costs.