Case ID: so2d_496/html/0816-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Sheran PORR, Respondent. Sheran PORR, Petitioner, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
    Nos. 65656, 65674.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Oct. 23, 1986.
    W.C. O’Neal of O’Neal & O'Neal, Gaines-ville, and James 0. Driscoll of Driscoll, Langston, Kane & Hess, P.A., Orlando, for petitioner/respondent.
    Thomas W. Davis and James M. Moran of Barton, Davis, Fernandes and Jamieson, Gainesville, for respondent/petitioner.
   PER CURIAM.

We accepted jurisdiction to review Porr v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 452 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) pending our review of Curtin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 449 So.2d 293 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) which was relied upon by the district court below. We recently dismissed the petition for review in Curtin. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company v. Curtin, 496 So.2d 815 (Fla.1986). Finding no conflict to support this Court’s jurisdiction, the petitions for review of both Porr and State Farm are dismissed.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

OVERTON, J., dissents.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED BY THE COURT. SEE FLA.R.APP.P. 9.330(d).