Case ID: f-appx_674/html/0596-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Fred HAYWOOD Petitioner-Appellant v. C.V. RIVERA, Warden, FCI-Forrest City Medium Respondent-Appellee
    No. 16-2615
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: January 30, 2017
    Filed: January 30, 2017
    Fred Haywood, Pro Se
    Stacey E. McCord, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR, for Respondent-Appellee
    Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Fred Haywood appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Upon careful de novo review, see Flowers v. Anderson, 661 F.3d 977, 980 (8th Cir. 2011), we conclude the action was properly dismissed for the reasons stated in the district court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable J. Thomas Ray, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).