Case ID: ad2d_23/html/0498-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph Dandry, Respondent, v. Patrick Dandry et al., Appellants.
   — In an action for dissolution of a partnership, an accounting and other relief, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 30, 1964, which granted plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of a receiver pendente lite, and which inter alla appointed such receiver. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. In our opinion, under the circumstances here, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to appoint the receiver; an early trial will adequately protect the interests of the parties (S. Z. B. Gorp. v. Buth, 14 A D 2d 678; Glassner v. Kaufman, 19 A D 2d 885). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.