Case ID: so2d_407/html/0997-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kenneth NORRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 81-273.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Dec. 16, 1981.
    Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow,, and Allyn Giambalvo, Asst. Public Defender, St. Petersburg, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael A. Palecki, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The sole issue raised on appeal is,whether appellant’s sentence is illegal under Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1980). This point is raised for the first time on appeal, and because Villery suggests that our supreme court contemplated that this issue be brought to the attention of the trial court in the first instance, we do not consider it on this appeal. However, this affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s raising this issue in the trial court by filing a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

BOARDMAN, A. C. J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.