Case ID: ad3d_151/html/1879-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Cheris N. Lawrence, Respondent, v Stephen C. Lawrence, Respondent. Susan B. Marris, Esq., Attorney for the Child, Appellant.
    [54 NYS3d 358]
   Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oswego County (Thomas Benedetto, Ref.), entered August 28, 2015 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the Attorney for the Child representing the parties’ oldest child appeals from an order dismissing the mother’s petition seeking modification of a custody order. Inasmuch as “the mother has not taken an appeal from that order [, the] child[ ], while dissatisfied with the order, cannot force the mother to litigate a petition that she has since abandoned” (Matter of Kessler v Fancher, 112 AD3d 1323, 1324 [2013]). A child in a custody matter does not have “full-party status” (Matter of McDermott v Bale, 94 AD3d 1542, 1543 [2012]), and we decline to permit the child’s desires “to chart the course of litigation” (Kessler, 112 AD3d at 1324).

Present—Whalen, P.J., Peradotto, DeJoseph, Curran and Winslow, JJ.