Case ID: sw3d_456/html/0517-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard E. ANTROBUS, Appellant, v. Edward O. MORELAND and First Student, Inc., Respondents.
    No. ED 101299
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    Filed: March 10, 2015
    James J. Wieczorek, 1717 Park Avenue, St. Louis, MO 68104, for appellant.
    Thomas J. Magee, 211 North Broadway, Suite 2700, St. Louis, MO 68102, for respondent.
    Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Antrobus appeals from the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict assigning zero fault to each party and awarding Antrobus no damages on his negligence claims. Antrobus seeks plain error review of this judgment, arguing that the verdict finding zero fault by either party should not have been accepted by the trial court. We find no error, plain or otherwise.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).