Case ID: so3d_227/html/0193-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

M.O., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D16-1903
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed May 26, 2017
    Jason D. Sammis and Leslie M. Sammis, Tampa, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cornelius C. Demps, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appel-lee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the circuit court’s adjudication of delinquency and sentence in all respects except the restitution order, which, on the State’s confession of error, we reverse and remand for the court to-render proper findings. See M.W.G. v. State, 945 So.2d.597, 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (“When no evidence of what the child could reasonably be expected to earn is presented at the restitution hearing, the trial court cannot make a finding on this issue.”)

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded.

NORTHCUTT, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.