Case ID: f-appx_413/html/0181-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tiombe HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-15990
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Feb. 8, 2011.
    Daniel Gary Hamm, Montgomery, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Susan Redmond, Montgomery, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    
      Before PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Daniel G. Hamm, appointed counsel for Tiombe Harris, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal suppoi’ted by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merits of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Harris’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.