Case ID: f-appx_472/html/0734-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jaime Feliciano URIAS-REYES, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 11-70752.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 17, 2012.
    
    Filed April 23, 2012.
    Thomas J. Tarigo, Esquire, Law Offices of Thomas J. Tarigo, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.
    Kohsei Ugumori, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Offiee of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
    Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jaime Feliciano Urias-Reyes, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen and rescind his in absentia deportation order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

Nor did the BIA abuse its discretion in denying Urias-Reyes’ motion to reopen because it was filed more than eighteen years after his final order of deportation, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(iii)(A)(l), Urias-Reyes did not establish the due diligence required for equitable tolling, see Iturribarria, 321 F.3d at 897, and UriasReyes’ conceded in his declaration that he received notice of the August 6,1991, hearing at which he was ordered deported in absentia. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252b(c).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.