Case ID: f_226/html/1022-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HEYMANN v. HARNESBERGER.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    October 25, 1915.)
    No. 2801.
    Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the1 Southern District of Georgia; Emory Speer, Judge.
    Samuel II. Myers, of Augusta, Ga., and Arthur H. Codington, of Macon, Ga., for appellant. William H. Fleming, of Augusta, Ga., for appellee.
    Before PARDEE and WALKER, Circuit Judges, and FOSTER, District Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

On a careful examination of this record, we conclude that there were no such prejudicial errors in the rulings made- in the District Court as would warrant a reversal. The decree appealed from is affirmed.