Case ID: nj-eq_86/html/0255-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John H. Meeker, trustee, &c., complainant-respondent, v. Katherine G. Forbes et al., defendants-appellants.
    [Argued December 1st, 1915.
    Decided June 19th, 1916.]
    On appeals from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevens, whose opinion is reported in 8J¡- N. J. Fq. 271.
    
    
      Mr. Atwood L. DeCoster, for the complainant.
    
      Mr. August F. Roche, Jr., Messrs. Vredenburgh, Wall & Careij, Mr. Philemon Woodruff, Messrs. McCarter & English and Messrs. Gallagher '& Gallagher, for the defendants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion hied in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Terhune, Heppenheimer, Williams — 12.

For reversal — Hone.