Case ID: f2d_94/html/1018-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. O. MUTCH, Whose First Name Is Unknown, and Will C. Mee, Appellants, v. Charles W. SEIGNIOUS, Jr., and Cleola Eunice Seignious, His Wife, Appellees.
    No. 7949.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
    Feb. 16, 1938.
    Weadock & Weadock, of Saginaw, Mich., and Clausen, Hirsh & Miller, of Chicago, 111., for appellants.
    Clark & Henry, of Bay City, Mich., for appellees.
    Before HICKS, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the court that a motion to docket and dismiss appeal has been filed, accompanied by certificate of the clerk of the District Court as provided by rule 18, and it further appearing that appellants have failed to file the record or docket the case by or before the return day, and that there has been no extension of time therefor, on consideration whereof, it is ordered that the appeal be, and the same is, docketed and dismissed.

Appeal docketed and dismissed.