Case ID: pa_563/html/0521-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: CAPPY, Justice,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

762 A.2d 1085
    John W. SIEKIERDA, Appellee, v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING, Appellant.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Dec. 22, 2000.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, the order of the common pleas court is REVERSED, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with Commonwealth v. McCafferty, 568 Pa. 46, 758 A.2d 1155 (2000), and Harrington v. Commonwealth, 563 Pa. 565, 763 A.2d 386 (2000).

Justice CAPPY files a concurring statement.

CAPPY, Justice,

concurring.

I join the per curiam reversal and remand for the reasons set forth more fully in my concurring opinion in Harrington v. Commonwealth, Dep’t of Transp., 563 Pa. 565, 763 A.2d 386. (2000).