Case ID: sw3d_512/html/0107-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Maurice ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 103693
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    FILED: March 7, 2017
    Kevin B. Gau, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Joshua D. Hawley, Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO; for Respondent.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Maurice Robinson appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).