Case ID: f-appx_547/html/0964-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Domenic FLOWERS, Defendant-Appellant.
    Nos. 13-10414, 13-10420
    
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Dec. 13, 2013.
    Randy Scott Chartash, Lawrence R. Sommerfeld, Sally Yates, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Joseph Domenic Flowers, FMC ButnerInmate Legal Mail, Butner, NC, pro se.
    Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      . These cases were consolidated on appeal.
    
   PER CURIAM:

Mary Erickson, counsel for Joseph Flowers, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED, and Flowers’ convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.