Case ID: f3d_815/html/0733-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stan MOTLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 15-11628
    Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    March 16, 2016.
    Harlan S. Miller, III, Parks Chesin & Walbert, PC, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Sandy R. Burney, Kaye Woodard Bur-well, Jerolyn Webb Ferrari, Lanna Renee Hill, Nwakaego Nkumeh, R. David Ware, Kristen B. Williams, Fulton County Attorney’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges, and KALLON, District Judge.
    
      
       The Honorable Abdul K. Kallon, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Alabama, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM:

Following a review of the record, and with the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment. This is one of those rare cases where, despite the existence of a prima facie case and sufficient evidence of pretext, no rational jury could conclude that the termination was discriminatory. See Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 530 U.S. 133, 148, 120 S.Ct. 2097, 147 L.Ed.2d 105 (2000); Flowers v. Troup County, 803 F.3d 1327, 1339 (11th Cir.2015); Schnabel v. Abramson, 232 F.3d 83, 90-91 (2d Cir.2000).

AFFIRMED.