Case ID: f-appx_438/html/0804-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric Lamont JOHNSON, a.k.a. William Ayala, a.k.a. Hafeez Malik Hakeem, a.k.a. Johnny Tomas, a.k.a. Chico Moniker, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 10-15576
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Aug. 17, 2011.
    Vernon Wayne McNeal, Corcoran, CA, pro se.
    Kenneth T. Roost, Esquire, AGCA—Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    
      Before BARKETT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Robert Ratliff, appointed counsel for Eric Johnson in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Johnson’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.