Case ID: wis_120/html/0302-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Siebeoeee, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dawley, Respondent, vs. City of Antigo and another, Appellants.
    
      December 15, 1903
    
    January 12, 1904.
    
    
      Borgman v. Antigo, ante, p. 296, followed
    Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Langlade ■county: John Goodland, Circuit Judge.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    Eor the appellants there was a brief by Henry Hay, attorney, and Max Hoffman, of counsel, and oral argument by .Mr. Hay.
    
    
      Geó. W. Latía, for the respondent.
   Siebeoeee, J.

The plaintiff is a resident and property •owner of the city of Antigo, and brought this action to declare a special tax and assessment for sprinkling certain .streets in the city, invalid, and that the cloud attempted to be created upon the title to lots owned by him, as a result, of such assessment, be removed. The facts in this case are identical with the facts in the case of Borgman v. Antigo, ante, p. 296, 97 N. W. 936, except that respondent in this ■case did not sign a petition for sprinkling any of the streets in the city of Antigo. The case is .ruled by the Borgman ■Case. The judgment must therefore be affirmed.

By the Court. — -The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.