Case ID: ga-app_34/html/0125-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

16144.
    Southern Railway Company v. Meers.
    Decided June 9, 1925.
    Damages; from Whitfield superior court—Judge Tarver. December 13, 1924.
   Per Curiam.

None of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial shows reversible error. There is some evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Luke, J., dissents.

Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.

Maddox, Maddox & Mitchell, for plaintiff in error.

William E. & Gordon Mann', contra!