Case ID: colo_86/html/0125-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Adams", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 12,341.
    Ernst v. Eldred.
    Decided May 27, 1929.
    Rehearing denied June 17, 1929.
    Mr. W. K. Ramsey, for plaintiff in error.
    Mr. E. L. Brock, Mr. John P. Akolt, Mr. E. E. Campbell, Mr. Milton Smith, Jr., for defendant in error.
    
      In Department.
    
   Mr. Justice Adams

delivered the opinion of the court.

Action in mandamus, brought by Ada Ernst in the district court, to compel the judge and acting clerk of the county court of Fremont county, to issue execution on a judgment theretofore obtained in said county court. The cause is here for the second time. Ernst v. Eldred, 80 Colo. 425, 252 Pac. 357. It was reversed and remanded, with directions to overrule the demurrer to the alternative writ and proceed with the case. The district court obeyed , our direction,. issues "were joined, and the cause proceeded to- trial. The court found that.certain personal property involved had been returned to Mrs. Ernst after the judgment in the county court, and before the commencement of the mandamus proceedings in the district court. Judgment was accordingly entered in favor of respondent Eldred and against petitioner Ernst, that the latter take nothing, and that the alternative writ be dismissed, which was accordingly done. Mrs. Ernst brings error and has applied for a supersedeas.

Eldred’s counsel has filed a motion that the writ of error be dismissed, on the ground, among other things, that it was not brought within one year from the rendition of the judgment complained of, as required by our rule 18.

As much of the rule referred to as is applicable to the present motion, reads, “A writ of error shall not be brought after the expiration of one year from the rendition of the judgment complained of; * * *”

Judgment was rendered on July 8, 1927. The writ of error was brought on March 30, 1929. It follows that the motion to dismiss is well taken, and it will be granted. Snider v. Ostrander, 62 Colo. 99, 100, 160 Pac. 195.

Other reasons are assigned for dismissal, but it is unnecessary to discuss them. ’ '

Writ dismissed.

Mr. Chief Justice Whitford, Mr. Justice At.ter and Mr. Justice Campbell concur.