Case ID: cust-ct_1/html/0444-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Sullivan, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 39617.
    Protests 772664-G, etc., of Greenberg & Josefsberg (New York).
   Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) beach balls at 30 percent under paragraph 1502, United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) followed; (2) rubber balls like those the subject of Abstract 27179 at 30 percent under paragraph 1502; (3) novelties in chief value of rubber at 25 percent under paragraph 1537 (b); and (4) novelties in chief value of fur at 50 percent under paragraph 1519 (e), Abstract 25607 followed.