Case ID: cust-ct_2/html/0575-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dallinger, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 40627.
    Protests 730011-G, etc., of Lord & Taylor et al. (New York).
   Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of bookends, candelabra, corks for bottles, and atomizers, chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. As they were plated with silver they were held dutiable at 50 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373), and Abstract 34153 followed.