Case ID: cust-ct_4/html/0436-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Before the Second Division,
    April 9, 1940
    No. 43446.
    Protests 125967-G, etc., of John Wanamaker (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

On the agreed facts embroidered articles similar to those involved in Glemby’s v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397) and Normandy lace like that passed upon in United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) were held dutiable at 75 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1430, Tariff Act of 1922; artificial flowers the same as the merchandise involved in Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1419; and silk wearing apparel like that the subject of Abstract 29972 was held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1210.