Case ID: fla_142/html/0767-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Motor Transit Company v. Lila King, et vir
    
    196 So. 192
    En Banc
    Opinion Filed May 17, 1940
    
      Samuel Kassewits, for Plaintiff in Error;
    
      Charles Cook Howell, Charles Cook Howell, Jr., and /. S'. Harrison, for Defendants in' Error.
   Per Curiam.

After a careful inspection of the record in this case and due consideration of the able briefs and arguments which have been submitted in behalf of the respective parties, the Court is of the opinion that there is no error in the record and that the judgment of the court below should be and is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Brown, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Justice Whitfield not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.