Case ID: tex_36/html/0201-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Walker, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. C. Barker and another v. The State.
    It was not error for the court helow to call the attention of the jury to the fact that there was other evidence in a felony case tending to corroborate the evidence of the State, which consisted in the testimony of an accomplice ; but leaving the jury to give the evidence such weight as they saw fit to ascribe to it.
    Appeal from McLennan. Tried below before the Hon. J. W. Oliver.
    There is no necessity for a statement of the facts.
    
      J. C. Barker and Newton Boyd, for themselves.
    
      Wm. Alexander, Attorney-General, for the State.
   Walker, J.

There is no assignment of errors in this case, nor are we able to discover upon the record any error which would authorize us in reversing the judgment.

The appellants were indicted for the larceny of dry goods and ready-made clothing. Several others were charged in the same indictment, and one Saunders, who appears to have been implicated in the larceny, gave evidence for the State.

There was certainly other evidence tending to show the guilt of appellants, and it was not error in the court to call the attention of the jury to this fact.

There is no comment upon the weight of the evidence, nor is the charge of the court at all unfavorable to the appellants.

The verdict is responsive to the evidence. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.