Case ID: njl_110/html/0607-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THOMAS GRAVES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. BURNS, LANE & RICHARDSON, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
    Submitted February 17, 1933
    Decided May 15, 1933.
    For the defendant-appellant, Collins & Corbin (Edward A. Marlcley).
    
    For the petitioner-respondent, Arthur C. Dunn.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The evidence examined abundantly supports the findings of the Supreme Court. The judgment is therefore affirmed, for the reasons stated in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court reported supra.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.