Case ID: so2d_739/html/0098-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Versiah M. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 98-1100.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Sept. 11, 1998.
    Jim Husbands, Panama City; Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and David P. Gauldin, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellant’s motion for certification, and certify to the supreme court the same question we certified in Griffis v. State, 703 So.2d 522 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), review granted, Case No. 92,160, — So.2d - (Fla.1998):

SHOULD THE HOLDING IN STATE v. GURICAN, 576 So.2d 709 (Fla.1991), BE RE-EVALUATED IN LIGHT OF ORTEGA-RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES, 507 U.S. 234, 113 S.Ct. 1199, 122 L.Ed.2d 581 (1993)?

BARFIELD, C.J., and KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.