Case ID: la-app_2/html/0128-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "LECHE, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. -
    First Circuit Appeal
    FRED PARKER, PROPRIETOR, ETC., v. BATON ROUGE ELEC. AND MACHINE WORKS
    (April 3, 1925, Opinion and Decree.)
    
      (Syllabus by the Editor.)
    
    .1. Louisiana Digest — Appeal—Par. 625.
    The finding of the district court on a matter of fact being clearly correct is affirmed.
    Appeal from the parish of East Baton Rouge, Hon. W. Carruth Jones, Judge.
    This is a suit to recover the balance due on an electric sign sold and delivered. There was judgment for plaintiff and defendant appealed.
    Judgment affirmed.
    Kernan & Wall, of Baton Rouge, attorneys for plaintiff, appellee.
    C. A. Holcombe, of Baton Rouge, attorney for defendant, appellant.
   LECHE, J.

Plaintiff’s suit is based upon a claim for one hundred and thirty-nine 42/100 dollars, representing a balance on the purchase price together with transportation charges, of an electric sign sold and delivered to defendant. The defense is that the sign was not made according to the specifications in the contract of sale. The district court rendered 'judgment in favor of plaintiff as prayed for and defendant has appealed.

The case is submitted to this court upon the record without brief or argument.

The evidenc in the record consists of the testimony of three witnesses who testified under commission, in behalf of plaintiff. That testimony seems to support the demand of plaintiff and finding no error in the judgment appealed from, we believe it should be affirmed and

It is so ordered.