Case ID: f3d_232/html/1363-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER'CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lester Javier GUADAMUZ-SOLIS, a.k.a. Lester Javier Guadamuz-Solio, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 00-11508.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Nov. 14, 2000.
    Henry P Bell, Asst. Fed. Pub. Def., Kathleen M. Williams, Fed. Pub. Def., Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Harriet Galvin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Anne R. Schultz, Dawn Bowen, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Before BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges, and GEORGE, District Judge.
    
    
      
       Honorable Lloyd D. George, U.S. District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.
    
   PER'CURIAM:

Lester Javier Guadamuz-Solis (“Solis”) appeals his sentence of 96 months’ imprisonment and 3 years’ supervised release for a conviction for illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2). He argues that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) has called into question the decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which controls this case. Almenda-rez-Torres remains the law until the Supreme Court determines that Almenda-rez-Torres is not controlling precedent. Accordingly, we

AFFIRM.