Case ID: mont_23/html/0094-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CITY OF BUTTE, Respondent, v. CALL, Appellant.
    [No 1,410.]
    [Submitted June 27, 1899.
    Decided July 3, 1899.]
    
      Criminal Law — Appeal—Notice of Appeal — Record—Dismissal of Appeal.
    
    The Appellate Court is without jurisdiction to consider an appeal, where the record contains no copy of the notice of appeal, as prescribed by Penal Code, Sec. 2281.
    
      Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; William Clancy, Judge
    
    Action by the City of Butte against Frank Call. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
    Dismissed.
    
      Mr. Chas. O' Donnell, for Appellant.
   PER CURIAM.

— The record in this case shows that the defendant was tried in the police court of the city of Butte, Silver Bow county, on a charge of violating Section 16 of Ordinance 471 of said city of Butte, entitled, ‘ An ordinance providing for the payment of licenses to the city of Butte, and repealing Ordinances Nos. 93, 342, 549, 373, 404 and 453.” He was adjudged guilty as chax*ged, and sentenced to pay a fine. From this * judgment he appealed to the District Court in and for said county, and upon another trial had therein, on May 16, 1898, he was again found guilty, and judgment for a fine entered against him. The record, however, contains no copy of the notice of appeal given, as provided by Section 2281 of the Penal Code. This Court is therefore without jurisdiction to review any question presented therein. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Dismissed.