Case ID: f-appx_624/html/0225-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED NEUROLOGY, P.A.; Athari Real Estate, Limited, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. HARTFORD LLOYD’S INSURANCE COMPANY, doing business as The Hartford, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 15-20241.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Dec. 11, 2015.
    Wayne D. Collins, Attorney, Collins O’Neal & Swofford, P.L.L.C., League City, TX, Robert Dale Green, Hunter Milam Klein, Green Trial Law, Joseph Todd Trombley, Trombley Law Firm, Houston, .TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    Martin R. Sadler, Esq., Lugenbuhl, Wheaton, Peck, Rankin & Hubbard, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before JOLLY and JONES, Circuit Judges, and MILLS , District Judge.
    
      
       District Judge of the Northern District of Mississippi, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM:

The court has carefully considered all of the issues raised in this appeal in light of the briefs, oral argument, and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, .we find no reversible error of law or fact and affirm for essentially the reasons stated in the district court’s comprehensive opinion. In particular, there is insufficient evidence to create a genuine dispute as to whether the appraisal panel exceeded its authority by improperly allocating damages to “mitigation” rather than to the actual pre-existing condition of the properties. TMM Investments, Ltd. v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co., 730 F.3d 466, 474-75 (5th Cir.2013). The court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.