Case ID: f-appx_413/html/0222-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BURFORD’S TREES, INC., Petitioner, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent.
    No. 10-10266
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Feb. 9, 2011.
    James L. Stine, Elizabeth K. Dorminey, Wimberly, Lawson, Steekel, Nelson & Schneider, P.C., Atlanta, GA, for Petitioner.
    Edmund C. Baird, Hilda Solis, USDOL, Office of the Solicitor, Washington, DC, Theresa Ball, Office of the Solicitor, US-DOL, Nashville, TN, for Respondent.
    Before BLACK, HULL and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and having had the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error.

AFFIRMED.