Case ID: sw2d_850/html/0437-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Wendy NICHOLS, Claimant/Appellant, v. SECREST ENGINEERED PRODUCTS, INC., Employer/Respondent.
    No. 62578.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    April 20, 1993.
    
      George J. Miller, the Miller Law Firm, Fenton, for claimant/appellant.
    Jeffrey Estes, Private Atty., Richmond Heights, William R. Gallagher, Private Atty., St. Louis, for employer/respondent.
    Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) reversing the award of the Administrative Law Judge and denying her claim for workers’ compensation benefits. We affirm. The Commission’s order is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).