Case ID: f-appx_650/html/0294-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles SWIFT, Plaintiff-Appellant v. KYLER, Defendant-Appellee Schmadeder, Chief of police; Corhart, Omaha Police, Defendants
    No. 15-3819
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 23, 2016
    Filed: May 26, 2016
    Charles Swift, Pro Se.
    Thomas O. Mumgaard, Ryan John Wiesen, City of Omaha, Legal Department, Omaha, NE, for Defendants-Appellee.
    Before SMITH, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Charles Swift appeals following the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review and careful consideration of Swift’s arguments for reversal, we conclude that the 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal of Swift’s claims against the City of Omaha was proper, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam); and that Swift created no jury questions on his claims against Richard Kyler, a police officer, see Moody v. St. Charles County, 23 F.3d 1410, 1412 (8th Cir. 1994) (party seeking to defeat summary judgment must substantiate allegations with sufficient probative evidence permitting finding in his favor). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable John M. Gerrard, United States District Judge for the District of Ne-braslca.