Case ID: fla_125/html/0221-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. W. Whitice v. State
    169 So. 927
    Opinion Filed June 18, 1936.
    
      Errol S. Wittes, for Plaintiff in Error;
    
      Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, and Angus Sumner, State Attorney, for the State.
   Per Curiam.

— Upon consideration of the entire record in this cause, we are convinced that the ends of justice require a new trial. So the judgment of the Circuit Court is hereby reversed. See Coker v. State, 83 Fla. 672, 93 Sou. Rep. 176; Howell v. State, 121 Fla. 327, 163 So. 691; Woodward v. State, 113 Fla. 301, 151 So. 509; Pass v. State, 121 Fla. 336, 163 So. 583; Davis v. State, 76 Fla. 179; 79 So. 450.

Reversed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford; and Davis, J. J., concur.