Case ID: f-appx_176/html/0808-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Martin Guillermo SINOHUI-BOJORQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-10507.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 5, 2006.
    
    Decided April 12, 2006.
    Raquel Arellano, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff—Appellee.
    Francisco Leon, Esq., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant—Appellant.
    Before: HAWKINS, MCKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Martin Guillermo Sinohui-Bojorquez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 60-month sentence imposed for importation of cocaine and possession with intent to distribute cocaine, all in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a), (b)(l)(A)(ii), 952(a) and 960(b)(l)(b)(ii).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Sinohui-Bojorquez has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Sinohui-Bojorquez has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.