Case ID: nj_54/html/0093-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MATTHEW LANISH, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Argued May 9, 1969
    Decided June 2, 1969.
    
      Mr. Remo M. Groce, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney).
    
      Mr. Victor Friedman argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Louis A. Smith on the brief).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Sullivan in the Appellate Division, 103 N. J. Super. 441.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman. — 7.

For reversal — None.