Case ID: so2d_675/html/0262-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Leah WEAVER, Appellant, v. Frank COX, Peggy Cox, Sallye O. Bates, Anne O. Cox, Sheri C. Wright, Pan American Corporation, Appellees.
    No. 95-3429.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    June 26, 1996.
    
      William S. Isenberg of Latona & Isenberg, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    Robert A. Huth, Jr. of English, McCau-ghan & O’Bryan, P.A., Boea Raton, for appel-lees.
   PER CURIAM.

We agree with the appellant that the trial court erred in concluding that the final judgment on Count I of the complaint precluded her from proceeding on Count VII. Count VII was based on different facts as well as a different theory of recovery, and the final judgment on Count I was not conclusive as to Count VII.

Reversed.

GUNTHER, C.J., and KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.