Case ID: so2d_481/html/1300-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James W. ATKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 86-68.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Jan. 28, 1986.
    James W. Atkins, in pro. per.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before BASKIN, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
   DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.

The trial judge’s disposition of the defendant’s Rule 3.850 motion is a model that is too rarely seen: he has attached to his order denying relief the plea agreement and plea colloquy which, taken together, conclusively show that the defendant’s claim that he was promised six years imprisonment and received twenty-two years instead is totally without merit.

Affirmed.