Case ID: pa-super_217/html/0282-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam, Hoffman, J.:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Commonwealth v. Hall, Appellant.
    Argued June 11, 1970.
    Before Wright, P. J., Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, and Cercone, JJ.
    
      
      Jules N. Mazis, for appellant.
    
      James D. Crawford, Deputy District Attorney, with him Deborah E. Glass, Assistant District Attorney, Richard A. Sprague, First Assistant District Attorney, and Arlen Specter, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
    September 18, 1970:
   Opinion

Per Curiam,

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Dissenting Opinion by

Hoffman, J.:

This appeal raises a question identical in all relevant respects with the appeal in Commonwealth v. Mills, 217 Pa. Superior Ct. 269, 269 A. 2d 322 (1970). For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in that case, I would vacate judgment of sentence and discharge appellant.