Case ID: ny_184/html/0542-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert D. Vroom, Respondent, v. Russell Sage, Appellant.
    
      Vroom v. Sage, 100 App. Div. 285, affirmed.
    (Argued February 1, 1906;
    decided February 27, 1906.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 16, 1905, affirming a judgment.in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
    
      
      George W. Wicker sham,, Sidney Smith and Charles A. Gardiner for appellant.
    
      Henry D. Hotchkiss for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Hisoook and Chase, JJ.