Case ID: mich_396/html/0990-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Albert Kahn Associates, Inc v Court of Appeals.
    (Docket No. 58462.)
    
      Sullivan, Ranger, Ward & Bone for plaintiff. Zeff & Zeff for Mildred Silisky.
   Complaint for superintending control, motion for immediate consideration, thereof, motion for oral argument and the supplemental complaint for writ of superintending control filed on behalf of plaintiff are considered. Now, it is therefore ordered, that the motion for immediate consideration be, and the same is granted. The complaint for writ of superintending control, motion for oral argument, and the supplemental complaint for writ of superintending control are denied.