Case ID: f-appx_96/html/0491-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Cenobio Herrera LANZ, aka Bert Herrera, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 03-50091.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 22, 2004.
    
    Decided April 26, 2004.
    Ronald L. Cheng, Esq., R. Stephen Kramer, Esq., Steven J. Olson, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Cenobio Herrera Lanz, Terminal Island, CA, pro se.
    James M. Crawford, Esq., Orange, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: O’SCANNLAIN, RYMER, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Cenobio Herrera Lanz appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 33-month sentence for wire fraud and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Lanz has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and-a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Lanz has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

Lanz’s motion for extension of time to file a supplemental brief is denied.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.