Case ID: so3d_46/html/0606-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Tamra E. PIERCE, Appellant, v. Linda M. PIERCE, Appellee.
    No. 1D10-1872.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Sept. 7, 2010.
    Rehearing Denied Oct. 26, 2010.
    Michael R. Rollo of Michael J. Rollo, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellant.
    Robert O. Beasley and Phillip Pugh of Litvak Beasley & Wilson, LLP, Pensacola, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of July 8, 2010, the Court has determined that the order on appeal, which denied a motion to enforce a mediated settlement agreement and set aside the agreement upon determining it was signed under duress, is not one which finally determines a right or obligation of an interested person in a probate matter. Thus, the order is not subject to immediate review pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(a)(2). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In light of this dismissal, all pending motions are denied as moot.

DAVIS, BENTON, and CLARK, JJ., concur.