Case ID: sw2d_987/html/0495-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Grezegory KOLTUNIAK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WERNER LADDER CO. INC., et al., Defendants. Hudson Company, Third Party Plaintiff/Appellant, v. School Sisters of Notre Dame, Third Party Defendant/Respondent.
    No. 73996.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    March 2, 1999.
    Burroughs, Hepler, Broom, MacDonald & Hebrank, Theodore J. MacDonald, Jr., Amy K. Collignon, Edwardsville, IL, for appellant.
    Evans & Dixon, L.L.C., Stefan J. Gylnias, Edward S. Meyer, Adrian P. Sulser, Todd L. Beekley, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J. and GARY M. GAERTNER, J. and RHODES RUSSELL, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Hudson Company (Hudson) appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of School Sisters of Notre Dame (Sisters) in a third party action focusing on a contractual indemnity provision.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. Upon de novo review, we find no genuine issue of material fact or error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). 
      
      . This appeal only addresses the third party action pursued by Hudson Company against School Sisters of Notre Dame.