Case ID: f-appx_332/html/0437-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edin MUJADZIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doug SERA, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 07-35594.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 20, 2009.
    
    Filed Sept. 1, 2009.
    Edin Mujadzic, Beaverton, OR, pro se.
    Doug Sera, Happy Valley, OR, pro se.
    Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Edin Mujadzic appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his action against a former coworker under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Mujadzic’s action because individual employees cannot be held liable under Title VII. See Miller v. Maxwell’s Int’l Inc., 991 F.2d 583, 587-88 (9th Cir.1993) (explaining that Title VII limits civil liability to the employer).

Mujadzic’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

Mujadzic’s “Motion to Payback Money by 6-22-2009” is denied.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.