Case ID: sw2d_983/html/0568-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael FRANK, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Timothy NOBLE, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. 73859.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Oct. 27, 1998.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 28, 1998.
    Application for Transfer Denied Feb. 23, 1999.
    Norton Y. Beilenson, Don V. Kelly, Sus-man, Schermer, Rimmel & Shifrin, Clayton, for Appellant.
    Mark H. Neill, St. Louis, for Respondent.
    Before SIMON, P.J., and CRANE and • MOONEY, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Frank (plaintiff) appeals from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis in favor of Timothy Noble (defendant) on plaintiffs claim for breach of contract. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that no error of law appears. Because an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.