Case ID: wis_177/html/0378-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hahn, Plaintiff, vs. Eells and wife, Respondents, and Vick, Appellant.
    
      March 15
    
    June 6, 1922.
    
    
      Appeal and error: Equal division of court.
    
    Where the justices of the supreme court are equally divided in opinion on the question involved on an appeal, the order appealed from will be affirmed.
    Appeal from an order of the county court of Waukesha county: David W. Agnew, Judge.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    The respondents secured a judgment for over $900 against the appellant, who appealed to this court from such judgment and deposited with the clerk of the court $250 as security for costs. The appeal was dismissed without costs, and the respondents served an order to show cause upon the appellant why the rñoney in the hands of the clerk of the court should not be applied on the judgment. The court entered an order directing the payment- of the $250 to the respondents to apply on the judgment, and the appeal is from such order.
    The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of John F. Flint of Milwaukee, and for the respondents on that of G. Holmes Daubner of Waukesha.
   The following opinion was filed April 11, 1922:

Per Curiam.

There being an equal division of the Justices on the question presented by the appeal, the order is affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on June 6, 1922.