Case ID: so3d_232/html/0441-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Levine, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Roger E. CARUTHERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-1567
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [December 13, 2017]
    Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Levine, J.

In a motion for rehearing, the state for the first time cites Dean v. State, 230 So.3d 420, 2017 WL 3774647 (Fla. Aug. 31, 2017), an opinion which issued before oral argument in this case. In a concurring opinion in. Dean, three justices stated that “where the evidence supports the charged offense as well as the requested instruction on a necessarily lesser included offense, any error in failing to give the requested instruction is harmless because the defendant is not entitled to an opportunity for a jury pardon.” See id. (Polston, J., concurring). Because Dean did not involve, a majority, we are compelled to follow Daugherty v. State, 211 So.3d 29 (Fla. 2017). See Santos v. State, 629 So.2d 838, 840 (Fla. 1994) (“Under the Florida Constitution, both a binding decision and a binding prec-edential opinion are created to the extent that at least four members of the Court have joined in an opinion and decision.”) (citing art. V, § 3(a), Fla. Const.) (footnotes omitted); Accordingly, the motion for rehearing is denied.

Gerber, C.J., and May, J., concur.