Case ID: sw3d_502/html/0078-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marka C. WARD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 103569
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    FILED October 25, 2016
    
      Timothy J. Forneris, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, Attorney for Appellant
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorney for Respondent
    Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Marka C. Ward (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Movant’s Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence denying Movant’s Rule 29,15 claims for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).