Case ID: cust-ct_38/html/0454-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Oliver, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 60610.
    Isaac B. Cohen & Sons Corp. et al. v. United States,
    protests 268572-K, etc. (New York).
   Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” and “B” consist of dime savings banks similar in all material respects to those the subject of M. Pressner & Co. v. United States (36 Cust. Ct. 262, C. D. 1784), the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 12 percent under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), for articles, not specially provided for, wholly or in chief value of tin or tin plate, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at 22){ percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, for manufactures of metal, not specially provided for.