Case ID: nj-eq_107/html/0180-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael T. Connolly, appellant, v. Joseph Shannon, respondent.
    [Decided October 20th, 1930.]
    
      Messrs. Homan, Buchanan & Smith, for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. Lindabury, Depue & Faulks, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 105 N. J. Eq. 155.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Busicirk, McG-lennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.