Case ID: ad2d_22/html/0770-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Andrew Alberti, Petitioner, v. Thomas Dickens, as Justice of the Supreme Court of the County of New York, et al., Respondents.
   Article 78 proceeding unanimously dismissed. The determination sought to he reviewed is an order adjudicating the petitioner guilty of contempt of court for failure to appear before a Grand Jury as a witness in response to a subpoena served upon him. This proceeding does not lie to review such an order. (See Code Crim. Pro., § 619; CPLR 7801; Judiciary Law, § 752; Matter of Grand Jury of County of Kings [Reardon], 278 App. Div. 206; People v. Brayer, 6 A D 2d 437.) The order will bq reviewable on an appeal which the petitioner has also taken. Concur — Rabin, J. P,, Yalente, Eager and Steuer, JJ.