Case ID: nj-misc_21/html/0386-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MAX FISCHBEIN, PETITIONER-DEFENDANT, v. REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, INC., AND COMMERCIAL CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., RESPONDENTS-PROSECUTORS.
    Argued October 6, 1943
    Decided November 12, 1943.
    Before Justices Case, Donges and Porter.
    For the petitioner-defendant, David Roslcein (Harry Cohn, of counsel).
    Por the respondents-prosecutors, Henry M. Grossman (Isidor Ealisch, of counsel).
   Per Curiam.

This is an application by the employer in a compensation case for a writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the Essex County Court of Common Pleas in affirming a judgment and award of the "Workmen’s Compensation Bureau.

An examination of the moving papers leads us to the conclusion that a debatable legal question has been presented and that a writ of certiorari should be allowed. Both parties have leave to take depositions on five days’ notice to be used on the return of the writ.