Case ID: cal_70/html/0022-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Thornton, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 9350.
    Department Two.
    June 17, 1886.]
    In the Matter of the Estate of W. J. TANNER, an Insolvent.
    Appeal—Insolvency—Order Settling Account—Abstract or Evidence —Record. — On an appeal from an order settling the final account of an assignee in insolvency, a paper embodied in the transcript, certified by the trial judge as containing “an abstract of the evidence given on the hearing of the settlement of the account of the assignee,” forms no part of the record, and will be disregarded.
    Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco settling the final account of an assignee in insolvency.
    The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
    
      Robert Ash, for Appellant.
    
      A. D. Splivalo, for Respondent.
   Thornton, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco settling the final account of Julius Buhlert, assignee of the estate of the insolvent above named.

There is in the transcript a paper, certified by the judge of the court below as containing an abstract of the evidence given on the hearing of the settlement of the account of said assignee.”

We know of no law authorizing this court to notice the contents of this paper. It must therefore be disregarded.

We find nothing erroneous in the record.

Order affirmed.

McKee, J., and Sharpstein, J., concurred.