Case ID: so2d_349/html/0175-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STOCKTON, WHATLEY, DAVIN & COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, and New Hampshire Insurance Company, a New Hampshire Corporation, Appellants, v. Richard N. BROCK and Jeanne D. Brock, his wife, Appellees.
    No. CC-455.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    April 13, 1977.
    E. Harper Field and Michael L. Granger of Keen, O’Kelley & Spitz, Tallahassee, for appellants.
    W. J. Oven, Jr., Tallahassee, for appel-lees.
   PER CURIAM.

It is axiomatic that the findings of a trial judge sitting as a trier of fact without a jury are entitled to the same presumption of correctness as is accorded to a jury verdict. Our examination of the record, consideration of the briefs by able counsel and the hearing of oral argument fails to reveal prejudicial error. Accordingly, the final judgment here appealed is

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, C. J., and RAWLS and McCORD, JJ., concur.