Case ID: so2d_830/html/0273-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rolan PEAK, Appellant, v. Phillip GRIFFITTS, Individually, and Richard E. Jackson, Individually, Appellee.
    No. 1D02-3698.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Nov. 18, 2002.
    Henry Lawrence Perry, Panama City, and Robyn B. Bennett, Birmingham, AL, for Appellant.
    D. Lloyd Monroe, IV, and David B. Swi-talski, Coppins & Monroe, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order, dated October 16, 2002, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The order on appeal, Order Granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Count V, dated August 8, 2002, is neither a final appeal-able order nor an appealable partial final order where an interrelated counterclaim for indemnification is pending below. See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97, 99-100 (Fla.1974); Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(k), (m).

DISMISSED.

ALLEN, C.J., DAVIS and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.