Case ID: nj-eq_60/html/0483-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

H. B. Claflin Company, complainant and appellant, v. Julius Freudenthal et al., defendants and respondents.
    [Filed June 18th, 1900.]
    On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in 13 Dick. Ch. Rep. 298.
    
    
      
      Mr. Beuben M. Hart and Mr. Charles J. Roe, fox the appellant.
    
      Mr. Eugene Stevenson, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Emery in the opinion below.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees — 13.

For reversal — Hone.