Case ID: njl_110/html/0015-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHARLES HORTMAN, APPELLANT, v. J. H. MORRIS COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
    Argued October 25, 1932
    Decided January 5, 1933.
    For the appellant, Frank I. Casey.
    
    For the respondent, James J. McGoogan.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 262.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.