Case ID: so2d_554/html/1165-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Peter PISANO, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 74045.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Jan. 11, 1990.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Robert F. Moeller, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and David R. Gemmer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We accepted Pisano v. State, 539 So.2d 486 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), based on apparent conflict with decisions of other district courts of appeal. Upon examination of the record and the briefs, we have determined that jurisdiction was granted improvidently. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED BY THE COURT.