Case ID: nj_63/html/0593-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cubiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BERTHA SCHRAMM AND GEORGE SCHRAMM, PLAINTIFFS’RESPONDENTS, v. ARSENAL ESSO STATION, DEPENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND KRAUSZER’S VENDING, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued November 5, 1973
    Decided November 20, 1973.
    
      Mr. Herbert Klein argued the cause for appellant Kraus-zer’s Vending, Inc. (Messrs. Krieger and Klein, attorneys; Mr. William J. Poilinger on the brief).
    
      Mr. Philip M. Lustbader argued the cause for respondent Arsenal Esso Station. (Philip M. Lustbader, David Lust-bader, a Professional Corporation, attorneys).
   Pee Cubiam.

The judgment is affirmed substantally for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. Schramm v. Arsenal Esso Station and Krauszer’s Vending, Inc., reported at 124 N. J. Super. 135 (App. Div. 1973).

For affirmance — Justices Jacobs, Hall, Sullivan, Pash-man and Clieeoed and Judge Coneokd — 6.

Opposed — Hone.