Case ID: nc_179/html/0680-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HORACE R. DOWELL v. RALEIGH SAVINGS BANK AND TRUST COMPANY.
    (Filed 7 April, 1920.)
    Appeal by plaintiff from Guión, J., at the October-November Term, 1919, of Wake.
    
      Manning, Kitchin & Mébane, and Armistead Jones & Son for plaintiff.
    
    
      R. N. Simms for defendant.
    
   Per Curiam.

We have carefully examined this case, and can see no error in it which is sufficient ground for a reversal of the judgment. The ruling of the judge upon the evidence appears to be correct, and when the other exceptions are- considered, we agree with the court that there was not any evidence which could be held as sufficient in law to support a verdict.for the plaintiff; and the judgment of nonsuit was properly allowed. This would still be our conclusion if the rejected evidence had been admitted.

No error.