Case ID: f-appx_135/html/0060-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Levi Samuel LABUFF, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 04-30162.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 8, 2005.
    
    Decided June 13, 2005.
    Bernard F. Hubley, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Helena, MT, for Plaintiff— Appellee.
    Edmund F. Sheehy, Jr., Esq., Helena, MT, for Defendant — Appellant.
    
      Before: TASHIMA, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Appellant’s conviction is affirmed. See United States v. LaBuff, 03-30273.

The case is remanded to the district court to consider whether “the sentence [it] imposed would have differed materially if [it] were applying the Guidelines as advisory rather than mandatory....” United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1085 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). If so, the sentence should be vacated and the defendant re-sentenced. Id.

Conviction AFFIRMED and sentence REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.