Case ID: f-appx_299/html/0259-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Paul YONGO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY; Carol Martin; Rhonda Hogge, AIC; Nationwide Claims Department; Nationwide Loss Adjusters; Sharron Stephen-Henley; Arthur Walter; Nationwide Affinity Insurance Company of America; Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company; J. Cater Glass; Harold C. Rhudy, Defendants-Appellees, and Latonya Michele McNeil, Defendant.
    No. 08-1668.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 8, 2008.
    Decided: Nov. 13, 2008.
    Paul Yongo, Appellant Pro Se. George Lee Simpson, III, Law Office of George L. Simpson, III, Raleigh, North Carolina; Benjamin E. Thompson, III, Broughton, Wilkins, Smith, Suggs & Thompson, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Paul Yongo appeals the district court’s orders accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and denying his post-judgment motion to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Yongo v. Nationwide Ins. Co., No. 5:07-cv-00094-D (E.D.N.C. May 16, 2008; May 27, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.