Case ID: ad_203/html/0835-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Before State Industrial Board, Respondent. In the Matter of the Claim of Himan Krinsky, for Compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, v. Ward & Gow.
   Motion in so far as it asks for an order in accordance with the mandate of the United States Supreme Court granted, Motion in so far as it asks for the granting of costs in all courts denied, without costs, on the ground that the affirmance by the United States Supreme Court “ with costs ” meant only costs in that court. 
      
       See Ward v. Krinsky (-U. S.-; 66 L. ed.-[U. S. Adv. Ops. 1921-22, p. 616], affg. Krinsky v. Ward, 193 App. Div. 557; affd., 231 N. Y. 525).— [Rep.