Case ID: nys_15/html/0975-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dugro, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bauer, Respondent, v. Consumers’ Ice Co., Appellant.
    
      (Superior Court of New York City, General Term.
    
    October 10, 1891.)
    Appeal from special term.
    Action by Charles C. Bauer against the Consumers’ Ice Co. for personal injuries due to plaintiff’s being run over by a wagon of defendant.
    Argued before Ereedman, Dugro, and Gildersleeve, JJ.
    
      Edwards & Odell, (Hamilton Odell, of counsel,) for appellant. Lachman, Morgenthau & Goldsmith, (Samson Lachman, of counsel,) for respondent.
   Dugro, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor entered upon a verdict, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. A careful examination of the case discloses no error. The case required the submission of the evidence to the jury. The charge was fair, and presented the questions to be determined clearly and impartially. The requests to charge were sufficiently covered for the purposes of the case in the charge of the learned trial judge, and no injustice was done the defendant by the refusals to charge, except as had been charged. Upon the whole ease the judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.