Case ID: so2d_537/html/0675-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BARFIELD, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Klenton McLEMORE, Appellant, v. Penny McLEMORE, Appellee.
    No. 88-703.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Jan. 20, 1989.
    Rehearing Denied Feb. 20, 1989.
    Daniel S. Dearing, Tallahassee, for appellant.
    Jeffrey P. Whitton, Panama City, for ap-pellee.
   BARFIELD, Judge.

Klenton McLemore appeals from a final order awarding child support, alimony and distribution of marital assets. We hold that the trial court’s awards of child support and alimony satisfy the reasonableness test enunciated in Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). However, the distribution of marital property pursuant to paragraph ten is unclear and inconsistent with the alimony award. Therefore, we reverse and remand for clarification and further distribution of real property pursuant to paragraph ten of the final order.

Additionally, we provisionally grant ap-pellee’s motion for attorney’s fees on appeal and remand to the trial court for determination of a reasonable fee amount, in accordance with the rationale of Dresser v. Dresser, 350 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

JOANOS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.