Case ID: misc_49/html/0624-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Blanchard, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM,
    JANUARY, 1906.
    Henry Lissner, Respondent, v. Charles Dochtermann et al., Appellants.
    Municipal Courts — Procedure — Motion to amend judgment — Must tie made within five days.
    Municipal Court Act of the city of New York(L. 1902, ch. 580), § 254.
    Appeal from an order of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, Fifth District, borough of Manhattan.
    Maurice H. Gotlieb, for respondent.
    George Freifeld and S. C. Steinhardt, for appellants.
   Blanchard, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants from an order amending the judgment in favor of the defendants by striking therefrom the allowance of thirty dollars for costs and disbursements.

The motion for the order appealed from was made more than five days after the judgt ont was rendered and according to section 254 of the Municipal Court Act was too late. Buchbaum v. Feldman, 43 Misc. Rep. 85.

Scott and Dowling, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, with costs to appellant.