Case ID: sw2d_972/html/0333-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CITIBANK, SOUTH DAKOTA, Respondent, v. William O. SCHWEITZER, Appellant.
    No. 72941.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    April 14, 1998.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 4,1998.
    Application for Transfer Denied Aug. 25,1998.
    William O. Schweitzer, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeffrey T. Weisman, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, William O. Schweitzer, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 74.05 motion to set aside default judgment. Appellant had previously appealed from the judgment itself and we affirmed the judgment in Citibank, South Dakota v. Schweitzer, 941 S.W.2d 655 (Mo.App. E.D.1997). After this affirmance, Appellant filed his motion to set aside the default judgment with the circuit court. This motion was denied.

We have reviewed the Appellant’s brief and the legal file and find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. Further, as a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment by written order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).