Case ID: sw2d_945/html/0585-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary Lee ROST, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Kenneth F. ROST, Sr., Respondent/Appellant.
    No. 70938.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    May 13, 1997.
    Grant W. Smith, Linn, for respondent/appellant.
    Donald K. Althauser, Hermann, for petitioner/respondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

Husband appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion to modify the child custody provision of a decree of dissolution. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).