Case ID: neb_48/html/0897-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Ragan, C.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph G. Armstrong v. William W. Wood.
    Filed June 16, 1896.
    No. 6764.
    Review: Sufficiency of Evidence. Evidence examined, and held to sustain the finding of the district court, and the judgment affirmed.
    Error from the district court of Sheridan county. Tried below before Bartow, J.
    
      Thomas L. Bedlon, for plaintiff in error.
    
      W. S. Westover, contra.
    
   Ragan, C.

William W. Wood, an attorney at law, sued Joseph G. Armstrong in the district court of Sheridan county to recover the value of certain professional legal services rendered by the former for the latter at his request.. The case was tried to the court without a jury and resulted in a judgment in favor of Wood, and against Armstrong, for $55, to reverse which Armstrong has filed here a petition in error.

The only argument relied on here for a reversal of this judgment is that the finding of the court on which it is based is not sustained by sufficient evidence. There is no merit whatever in this contention. The evidence abundantly sustains the finding of the court and its judgment is

Affirmed.