Case ID: pa-super_224/html/0336-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cumberledge v. Cumberledge, Appellant.
    June 14, 1973:
    
      Michael A. Donadee, for appellant.
    No oral argument was made, nor brief submitted for appellee.
   Opinion

Per Curiam,

At oral argument, appellant contended that the lower court erroneously entered a judgment of arrearages from a support order without affording him an eviden-tiary hearing to determine financial ability to pay said judgment. Subsequent to argument, this Court was informed that appellant had died, and that therefore, an evidentiary hearing became moot.

As this appeal was limited to the issue of the right to have a hearing despite the existence of arrearages, onr holding in the instant case should not be disposi-tive of or prejudicial to any right of decedent’s estate to appeal on other grounds.

Order affirmed.