Case ID: cole-cas_1/html/0061-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Cur.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

M'Nealy ads. Morrison.
    SLEIGHT, plaintiff’s attorney, received a notice of retainer from Smith, in J uly ; m September following he received a like notice from Bowman, and twice feemed recognize him as the attorney in the fuit, tho’ he never ferved him with any declaration, but ferved it on Smith, and entered a default for want of a plea, which Bowman now moved to fet afide on the above ftatement of faéls.
   Per Cur.

It was certainly incumbent on Sleight to have told Bowman, when he received his notice of retainer, that he had received a fimilar notice from Smith.

Let the default be fet afide; the coils to abide the event of the fuit.