Case ID: nev_94/html/0122-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JAMES LOUIS BRUNER, Appellant, v. CAROL R. BRUNER, Respondent.
    No. 9140
    March 15, 1978
    575 P.2d 928
    
      David M. Schreiber, of Las Vegas, for Appellant.
    
      
      Dickerson, Miles & Pico, of Las Vegas, for Respondent.
   OPINION

Per Curiam:

We are asked to annul a discretionary order denying a father’s motion to change the custody of his son. There was substantial evidence submitted to support the apparent conclusion of the court that the child’s welfare would not be enhanced by a change of custody.

Affirmed.