Case ID: so2d_635/html/0978-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David LASALA, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 81996.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    May 5, 1994.
    Richard L. Rosenbaum of the Law Offices of Richard L. Rosenbaum, Fort Lauderdale, and Law Offices of Rhonda Rogers, P.A., Hollywood, for petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Joan Fowler, James J. Carney and Melynda L. Melear, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We review the decision of the district court of appeal in State v. Lósala, 625 So.2d 1214 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), in which the district court certified several questions as being of great public importance. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

In Carino v. State, 635 So.2d 9 (Fla.1994), the certified questions were answered to the extent the Court found appropriate. On the authority of the decision in Carino, the decision under review here is approved.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, SHAW, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.