Case ID: sw3d_491/html/0253-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles HERVEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 102518
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    
    Filed: March 15, 2016
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 26, 2016
    Application for Transfer Denied June 28, 2016
    Andrew E. Zleit, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Mov-ant/Appellant.
    Evan J. Buchheim,'P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
   ORDER -

PER CURIAM

Charles Hervey appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an eyidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record- on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Brooks v. State, 242 S.W.3d 705, 708 (Mo. banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a- memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b). 
      
      . Mo. R. Crim. P. 2013.