Case ID: sw2d_948/html/0137-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anishika WARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 70494.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    May 6, 1997.
    David C..Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, III, Jacqueline K. Hamra, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anishika Ward appeals from the denial of her Rule 24.035 motion following an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).