Case ID: f2d_756/html/1481-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Elizabeth D. DUNCAN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. David B. POYTHRESS, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 84-8076.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    March 20, 1985.
    Kathleen Kessler, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff s-appellants.
    Robert J. Winicki, Jacksonville, Fla., for amicus curiae Winicki.
    Patrick McKee, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellees.
    ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
    Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RO-NEY, TJOFLAT, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
    
    
      
       Judge Hill is recused and did not participate in this decision.
    
   BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.