Case ID: so2d_620/html/1241-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marvin TUCKER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 80870.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    June 24, 1993.
    Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict of Decisions, Second District — Case No. 91-03058, Hillsborough County.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Davis G. Anderson, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We review Tucker v. State, 608 So.2d 122 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), on the ground of conflict of decisions. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The district court’s decision affirming petitioner’s habitual offender sentence is approved on the authority of State v. Rucker, 613 So.2d 460 (Fla.1993).

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.