Case ID: so2d_953/html/0780-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sylvia JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D06-2216.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    April 25, 2007.
    Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and John M. Conway, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   ON MOTION FOR WRITTEN OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals an order revoking her probation. She argues the trial court erred in admitting a lab report concerning the results of her urinalysis exam in derogation of Crawford v. Washington. We disagree and affirm.

This court recently joined the First and Fifth District Courts of Appeal in holding that Crawford does not apply in community control and probation revocation proceedings. Jackson v. State, 931 So.2d 1062, 1063 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (certifying the issue to the Supreme Court of Florida). As we did in Jackson, we certify the question to the Supreme Court of Florida:

DOES THE “TESTIMONIAL HEARSAY” RULE SET FORTH IN CRAWFORD V. WASHINGTON, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), APPLY IN COMMUNITY CONTROL AND PROBATION REVOCATION PROCEEDINGS?

Affirmed.

STONE, FARMER and MAY, JJ., concur. 
      
      . 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004).