Case ID: f-appx_612/html/0783-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Oscar RODRIGUEZ-ALBIR, also known as Oscar Rodriguez-Elvir, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-40043
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Aug. 14, 2015.
    As Revised Aug. 17, 2015.
    Terri-Lei O’Malley, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Scott Andrew Martin, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Oscar Rodriguez-Albir, Laredo, TX, pro se.
    Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Oscar Rodriguez-Albir appeals the district court’s reimposition of a $100 special assessment after the court revoked his supervised release. A review of the revocation hearing transcript reveals that the district court made no findings as to whether Rodriguez-Albir satisfied the special assessment imposed at his original sentencing and did not orally reimpose the special assessment. Thus, as the Government concedes, there is a conflict between the oral pronouncement and the written judgment, and the oral pronouncement controls. See United States v. Martinez, 250 F.3d 941, 942 (5th Cir.2001). Accordingly, we VACATE IN PART and REMAND for the district court to delete the reimposition of the $100 special assessment from the written judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.