Case ID: njl_91/html/0718-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SOCIETY FOR ESTABLISHING USEFUL MANUFACTURES, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT ET AL., RESPONDENT.
    Argued November 27, 1917
    Decided January 31, 1918.
    On appeal from tlie Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported 'in 90 N. J. L. 469.
    For the appellant, Humphreys & Sumner.
    
    For the respondent, John W. Wescott, Spaulding Frazer, Harry Kalisch and Francis Scott.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Black in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.