Case ID: ad_273/html/1002-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Emily S. Jackson, Appellant, v. Raleigh Associates, Inc., et al., Respondents.
   We think that the applicability of the defenses set up in the amended replies should await the trial. Order denying plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve amended replies to the answers of the defendants unanimously reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 821.]