Case ID: f-appx_324/html/0671-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard GUTIERREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-10356.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 13, 2009.
    
    Filed April 29, 2009.
    Daniel R. Schiess, Esquire, USLV-Of-fice of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    
      Jason F. Carr, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: GRABER, GOULD, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Richard Gutierrez appeals from the 18-month sentence imposed following revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Gutierrez contends that the district court erred by failing to provide specific reasons for the sentence imposed and because it is impossible to determine whether the district court relied on impermissible factors in fashioning the sentence. We conclude that the district court gave specific reasons for its sentence and properly considered the permissible sentencing factors from 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 995 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc); see also United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062-64 (9th Cir .2007).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.