Case ID: ga_103/html/0560-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Lumpkin, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Solomon v. Whitehurst et al.
    
    Submitted October 25,
    Decided December 20, 1897.
    Equitable petition, etc. Before Judge Smith. Twiggs superior court. July 30, 1897.
    
      Hardeman & Moore, for plaintiff in error.
    
      F. Chambers and L. D. Shannon, contra.
   Lumpkin, P. J.

This court will not interfere with the discretion of a trial judge in overruling a motion for a new trial, based on the general grounds that the verdict is contrary to law and to the evidence, when it appears that the evidence, though conflicting, was amply sufficient to support the conclusion reached by the jury and expressed in the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.