Case ID: f2d_109/html/1022-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Willis N. VANATTA, Trading Under the firm name and style of Vanatta Manufacturing Co., v. THE PHILAD COMPANY.
    No. 9394.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Feb. 23, 1940.
    Lyon & Lyon, of Los Angeles, Cal., Morris Kirschstein, of New York City, and R. E. Caughey, of Los Angeles, Cal., for Philad Co.
    John Flam, of Los Angeles, Cal., for Willis N. Vanatta.
    Before DENMAN, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered appeal, D.C., 28 F.Supp. 539, and cross-appeal herein dismissed, each party bearing his own costs of appeal, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this court issue forthwith.