Case ID: ohio-st-3d_57/html/0199-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Columbus Bar Association v. Zolnier.
    [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Zolnier (1991), 57 Ohio St. 3d 199.]
    (No. 90-1127
    Submitted August 29, 1990
    Decided February 20, 1991.)
    
      
      Sally Ann Walters, Timothy J. Ucker and Brace Campbell, for relator.
    
      Russell P. Herrold III, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We concur with the board’s findings and agree with its recommendation that the misconduct warrants a more severe sanction than recommended by the panel. Accordingly, we order that respondent be suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio. Moreover, Gov. Bar R. V(28)(a) requires restitution before reinstatement from an indefinite suspension. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.