Case ID: ga-app_20/html/0799-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "G-eobge, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

8687.
    Haggerty v. Holmes & Barber.
    Decided September 13, 1917.
    Action for damages; from city court of Yaldosta—Judge Cranford. March 20, 1917.
    
      Greene F. Johnson, James M. Johnson, for plaintiff.
    
      E. K. Wilcox, Whitaker & Dukes, for defendants.
   G-eobge, J.

An examination of the record discloses no substantial error upon any controlling issue in the case. This being the second verdict in favor of the defendant, and there being evidence to sustain the verdict, the judgment overruling the plaintiff’s motion for new trial will not be reversed.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Luhe, J., concur.