Case ID: f-appx_315/html/0492-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Reginald A. McGARY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gene JOHNSON; Bryan Watson; Doctor Lee; Doctor Thompson; M. Stanford; Laila Holmes; Jane & John Does, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 08-7632.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 12, 2009.
    Decided: March 9, 2009.
    Reginald A. McGary, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Reginald A. McGary appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2006), for failure to state a claim and the court’s order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McGary v. Johnson, No. 7:08-cv-00418-jch-mfu, 2008 WL 2943147 (W.D.Va. July 30, 2008; Aug. 8, 2008). We deny MeGary’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.