Case ID: so2d_427/html/0338-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Vidonio MERCADO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 82-1682.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 1, 1983.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Ginsburg, Nagin & Rosin, Coral Gables, and Stephen Rosin, Sp. Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Faith Mesne-koff, Certified Legal Intern, and Diane Leeds, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before HUBBART, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Mullins v. State, 366 So.2d 1162 (Fla.1978) (Alderman, J., concurring), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 883, 100 S.Ct. 173, 62 L.Ed.2d 113 (1979); Wright v. State, 418 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Neely v. State, 402 So.2d 477 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Login v. State, 394 So.2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); State v. Ramos, 378 So.2d 1294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

We have examined the issue presented by the cross-appeal and find the cross-appeal to be without merit.