Case ID: f-appx_78/html/0395-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Etus COLLMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-21146.
    Conference Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Oct. 22, 2003.
    James Lee Turner, Assistant US Attorney, US Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Etus Coliman, Pecos, TX, pro se.
    Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Attorney Chris lies, appointed to represent Etus Coliman (“Coliman”), has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Coliman has filed a response raising sentencing issues. Coliman knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his sentence except for an upward departure. United States v. Portillo, 18 F.3d 290, 292 (5th Cir.1994). These issues are therefore waived. Collmaris requests for the dismissal of his appellate counsel and the appointment of new counsel are DENIED. Our independent review of the brief, the record, and Collmaris response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm. R. 47.5.4.