Case ID: so2d_435/html/0408-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Hector BARO, Appellee.
    No. 82-2654.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Aug. 3, 1983.
    
      Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Sharon Lee Stedman, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    No appearance for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Reversed. We believe the appellee’s motion to dismiss and the state’s traverse thereto raise an issue of material fact as to appellee’s participation in the burglary that formed the basis of the charges against the appellee. Cf. State v. Davis, 243 So.2d 587 (Fla.1971).

ANSTEAD, C.J., and HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.