Case ID: okla_176/html/0113-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re CLINTON’S GUARDIANSHIP.
    No. 26253.
    Feb. 18, 1936.
    W. F. Semple, Grady Lewis, and W. E. Foltz, for plaintiff in .error.
    Walker & Lewis, Ében L. Taylor, and Gibson, Maxey & Holleman, for defendants in error.
   PER CURIAM.

Tbe appeal is from an order dismissing an appeal from tbe probate court to tbe district court. A motion to dismiss was sustained by tbe trial judge in the district court, but no copy of the order .of dismissal appears in tbe record.

A motion to dismiss has been filed herein for tbe reason that tbe errors complained of cannot be reviewed by transcript. A response was called for, but no response has been filed. Tbis court has held that a motion to dismiss and the proceedings bad thereon are not a part of tbe record and can only be brought to this court by a bill of exceptions or case-made. Belcher v. Wasson, 13 Okla. 648, 75 P. 1131; Ford v. McIntosh, 22 Okla. 423, 98 P. 341; Black v. Kuhn, 6 Okla. 87, 50 P. 80; McMeachan v. Christy, 3 Okla. 301, 41 P. 382.

This appeal is therefore dismissed.

McNEILL, C. J., and RILEY, WELCH. .-PHELPS, and CORN, JJ., concur.