Case ID: so2d_493/html/0545-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Louise C. CARVER, Appellant, v. Jane A. PEARSON and James Pearson, her husband, Appellees.
    No. 86-353.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Sept. 9, 1986.
    Spencer & Taylor and Dean A. Mitchell, Miami, for appellant.
    High, Stack, Lazenby, Palahack & Laca-sa and Glen R. Goldsmith, Coral Gables, for appellees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The order under review granting the plaintiffs a new trial on the ground that the jury verdict was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence does not represent an abuse of discretion and is therefore affirmed. Ford Motor Co. v. Kikis, 401 So.2d 1341 (Fla.1981); Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So.2d 669 (Fla.1959).