Case ID: a3d_133/html/0737-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cal HEIDELBERG Jr., Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Appellee.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    March 29, 2016.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2016, we VACATE the Order of the Commonwealth Court. We REMAND this case to the Commonwéalth Court for further consideration in its appellate jurisdiction pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 763 (providing that an appeal from an order of a Commonwealth agency is directed to the Commonwealth Court’s appellate jurisdiction) and 42 Pa.C.S. § 708(c) (providing that where a complaint in the nature of mandamus is commenced against a government unit objecting to a governmental determination, where the proper mode of relief is an appeal from that determination, the court shall regard it as an appeal from that determination).