Case ID: f-cas_17/html/1147-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "THE COURT", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Case No. 10,006.
    NALLY v. LAMBELL.
    [1 Cranch, C. C. 365.] 1
    Circuit Court, District of Columbia.
    Dec. Term, 1806.
    Witness — Attachment for Fees — Demand in Name of Witness.
    ■The court will not grant an attachment against a party for not paying his witness, unless payment shall have been demanded by a person having authority to receive payment, and unless that authority appear.
    Motion for attachment by witness against the person at whose request he was summoned. Affidavit by Spaulding, that he was requested by Nally to demand, and .that he did demand payment, which was refused.
   THE COURT

(PITZHUGH, Circuit Judge, absent,)

refused the attachment,, because Spaulding’s authority did not appear,