Case ID: ad2d_20/html/0584-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Claim of Rose Sperling, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.
   What constitutes “good cause” within the meaning of subdivision 1 of section 593 of the Labor Law is a question of fact and thus within the province of the board if its findings are supported by substantial evidence (Labor Law, § 623; Matter of Lipschitz [Lubin], 7 A D 2d 777). On the present record we find no reason to disturb the board’s determination. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present —Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.