Case ID: f-appx_517/html/0070-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Tarireef WHITE, Petitioner.
    No. 12-3603.
    United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
    Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R.App. P.
    Nov. 2, 2012.
    Opinion filed: April 16, 2013.
    Tarireef White, Fairton, NJ, pro se.
    Michelle E. Whalen, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Wilmington, DE, for United States of America.
    
      Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, ALDISERT and BARRY, Circuit Judges.
   OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Tarireef White filed a petition for writ of mandamus on September 27, 2012, asking us to order the District Court to render a decision on his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

By order entered on March 18, 2013, the District Court dismissed White’s § 2255 motion and declined to issue a certificate of appealability. Because White has now received the relief he requested in his mandamus petition — a decision on his § 2255 motion — we will deny his mandamus petition as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir.1996).