Case ID: f-appx_427/html/0558-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Faviola PEREZ-ROBLES, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 09-72529.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 5, 2011.
    
    Filed April 13, 2011.
    Philippe Dwelshauvers, Esquire, Fresno, CA, pro se.
    Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Kohsei Ugumori, Emily Anne Radford, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    
      Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Faviola Perez-Robles, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her motion to reopen deportation proceedings conducted in absentia in 1991. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review Perez-Robles’ contention that the IJ should have equitably tolled the time limitation for her motion to reopen, and her contention that the IJ violated due process by failing to consider some of her evidence, because she failed to exhaust these contentions before the agency. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir.2004).

To the extent Perez-Robles challenges the IJ’s decision not to exercise her sua sponte authority to reopen proceedings, we lack jurisdiction to consider this claim. See Mejia-Hernandez v. Holder, 633 F.3d 818, 823-24 (9th Cir.2011).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.