Case ID: f2d_237/html/0920-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James L. HUSTON and Dayton Bait Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BUCKEYE BAIT CORPORATION, Buckeye Molding Company, and William H. Robinson, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 12718.
    United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
    Oct. 22, 1956.
    Des Jardins, Robinson & Keiser, Cincinnati, Ohio, Henry G. Dybvig, Dayton, Ohio, for appellants.
    Irvin V. Gleim, Dayton, Ohio, Dexter N. Shaw, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees.
    Before ALLEN, McALLISTER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed upon the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the district court and for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Cecil. 145 F.Supp. 600.