Case ID: ad3d_107/html/0617-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Definitions Personal Fitness, Inc., Appellant, v 133 E. 58th Street LLC., Respondent.
    [967 NYS2d 647]
   Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered December 19, 2012, which denied plaintiffs motion for a Yellowstone injunction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record demonstrates that plaintiff chronically failed to pay its rent, having forced defendant to bring 10 nonpayment proceedings over the last seven years. This is a breach of a substantial obligation under the lease (see Adam's Tower Ltd. Partnership v Richter, 186 Misc 2d 620, 621 [App Term, 1st Dept 2000]), and is a type of default that plaintiff cannot cure within the 15-day cure period provided for in the lease (see id. at 622). Accordingly, plaintiff was properly denied a Yellowstone injunction, since that relief requires a showing that plaintiff is able to cure (see Graubard Mollen Horowitz Pomeranz & Shapiro v 600 Third Ave. Assoc., 93 NY2d 508, 514 [1999]).

Defendant was not limited to a nonpayment proceeding under the term of the lease that provided for such proceedings for nonpayment. Chronic nonpayment is a violation of a different type than occasional nonpayment (see 326-330 E. 35th St. Assoc. v Sofizade, 191 Misc 2d 329, 331-332 [App Term, 1st Dept 2002]). Nor can plaintiff rely on any defect of the notice of default, since no such notice is even necessary for an action based on chronic nonpayment (see 3363 Sedgwick v Medina, 187 Misc 2d 421 [App Term, 1st Dept 2000]). Furthermore, contrary to plaintiffs contention, there are no equitable considerations that would require a different result. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Renwick, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.