Case ID: so2d_438/html/0202-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mark J. FELDMAN and Mark J. Feldman, P.A., Appellants, v. Donald L. FARBER, P.A., Appellee.
    No. 83-1402.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 11, 1983.
    Mark J. Feldman, Miami, for appellants.
    Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin, and Joel D. Eaton, Miami, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM:

Based on appellee’s confession of error, that an injunction is not a proper remedy in an action at law where monetary damages will adequately compensate, Supreme Service Station Corp. v. Telecredit Service Center, Inc., 424 So.2d 844 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Digaeteno v. Perotti, 374 So.2d 1015 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), we reverse and remand.

Reversed and remanded.