Case ID: tenn_1/html/0380-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

KIMBLE vs. JOSLIN.
    Debt, upon a bond with a collateral condition.—The condition was for building a house in a manner specified in a former bond.
    Under the plea of non infregit conventionem, parol evidence was offered to shew what the former bond required, stating it would be proved that the defendant had that bond.
    Parol proof cannot be received to shew the contents of a deed in the possession of the opposite party,unless he had notice to produce the deed.
   Per Curiam.

This evidence cannot be received, unless reasonable notice had been given to produce that bond on the trial, and then, on failure to do so, parol evidence might be received. See 1 John. 340. 1 Day. 103.