Case ID: so2d_560/html/0261-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carlos J. MATTOS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 89-2134.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 3, 1990.
    Rehearing Denied May 24, 1990.
    Bierman, Shohat & Loewy and Ira N. Loewy and Donald I. Bierman, Thornton Rothman & Ernas and David Rothman, Miami, for appellant.
    
      Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

A petitioner is not entitled to relief from a judgment of conviction on a writ of cor-am nobis where the facts upon which the petition is based were known to the petitioner when the judgment was entered. Smith v. State, 400 So.2d 956 (Fla.1981); Hallman v. State, 371 So.2d 482 (Fla.1979); State v. Brick, 490 So.2d 1330 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 496 So.2d 142 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.