Case ID: f-appx_114/html/0583-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re: Ralph Franklin FREDRICK, Petitioner.
    No. 04-7103.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 22, 2004.
    Decided Dec. 10, 2004.
    Ralph Franklin Fredrick, Petitioner pro se.
    Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM.

Ralph Franklin Fredrick petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition, deny Fredrick’s motion to expand the record, and deny his motion to expedite. Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED