Case ID: so3d_256/html/0254-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Adrian WEBB, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 1D17-5319 1D18-0150 1D18-0151
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    October 31, 2018
    Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Appellant challenges three orders revoking his probation in three separate cases. We consolidate these cases for purposes of this opinion, as all three orders stem from the same hearing and the same allegations presented by the State. We affirm but write only to address an error in the written orders revoking appellant's probation.

Appellant contested the State's allegations that he violated his probation by committing five new law offenses and violating a special condition of his probation. After a hearing the trial court found appellant only committed three new law violations and did not violate the special condition. However, the trial court's three revocation of probation orders state that appellant admitted to all five new law violations and a violation of the special condition.

We AFFIRM the trial court's orders without further comment, and REMAND the cases for entry of corrected revocation of probation orders. Enno v. State , 59 So.3d 149 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

Wolf, Lewis, and Rowe, JJ., concur.