Case ID: so3d_273/html/0301-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Louisiana v. Michael J. DUFRENE
    No. 2018-KO-1174
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    May 28, 2019
    ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT, PARISH OF TANGIPAHOA
   PER CURIAM:

Writ granted in part, otherwise denied; case remanded. Defendant's sentences are vacated and the case is remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accordance with the provisions of La.C.Cr.P art. 894.1 and La.C.Cr.P. art. 883, including the court's articulation of its reasons for the sentences imposed.

SENTENCES VACATED; CASE REMANDED.

GUIDRY, J., would deny. 
      
      Cf. State v. Green , 16-0107, p. 14 (La. 6/29/17), 225 So.3d 1033, 1042, cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 459, 199 L.Ed.2d 338 (2017) :
      Here, defendant's conduct transpired within a very short period. ... Absent well-articulated reasons from the sentencing court, we decline to say whether it was an abuse of discretion to impose consecutive terms. Thus, we will remand the matter to the trial court to consider whether defendant indeed poses a grave risk to public safety and, at a minimum, to articulate reasons for the consecutive terms.