Case ID: ga_249/html/0389-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

38141.
    WOOD et al. v. COLE.
    Decided April 29, 1982
    Rehearing denied May 18, 1982.
    
      Alexander & Vann, William U. Norwood, for appellants.
    
      H. Lamar Cole, District Attorney, pro se.
   Per curiam.

It is undisputed that the issues raised in this appeal are moot. While we agree with appellants’ argument that there are issues “capable of repetition yet evading review” (see Gannett Co. v. DePasquale, 443 U. S. 368, 373 (99 SC 2898, 61 LE2d 608) (1979), we also find that the record in this case is such that we are unable to adequately consider the issues.

It is therefore the judgment of this court that the case be dismissed as moot.

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Weltner, J., who is disqualified.