Case ID: sw3d_156/html/0529-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 63800.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    March 1, 2005.
    Craig A. Johnston Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
    Deborah Daniels, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., SMART, J. and EDWIN H. SMITH, C.J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following his conviction by guilty plea to robbery in the second degree, Section 569.030, James Brown filed a pro se Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing.

Brown appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, alleging that without an evidentiary hearing the court could not determine if appointed counsel complied with Rule 24.035(e) or had instead abandoned him. On this basis, Brown urges the court to reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing, This court affirms the judgment. Rule 84.16(b). 
      
      . All statutory references are to RSMo (2000) unless otherwise indicated.