Case ID: so2d_281/html/0584-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William Henry DRAYTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 71-225, 72-248.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Aug. 22, 1973.
    W. Daniel Kearney, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, and William Henry Drayton, in pro. per., for appellant.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the briefs and record on appeal and find that the appellant’s motion under RCrP 3.850, 33 F.S. A., is without merit.

Affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and LILES and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.