Case ID: ohio-st-3d_75/html/0556-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Foster, Appellant.
    [Cite as State v. Foster (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 556.]
    
      (No. 95-2631
    Submitted April 15, 1996
    Decided June 5, 1996.)
    
      Mark C. Fleegle, Muskingum County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
    
      William H. Foster, pro se.
    
   Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals, since appellant has failed to demonstrate “a genuine issue as to whether * * * [he] was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel on appeal.” App.R. 26(B)(5).

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.