Case ID: so2d_610/html/0070-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Samuel WILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 91-3567.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Dec. 9, 1992.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 13, 1993.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Sarah B. Mayer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We find no reversible error as to appellant’s conviction and affirm that conviction. On the issue of restitution we find no error in the trial court’s order setting the amount of restitution. However, we do find error in the trial court's determination of the periodic payments that appellant must pay. On that issue we reverse with directions that the trial court reserve jurisdiction to determine the amount of periodic payments at a hearing to be initiated by the state and to be conducted after appellant begins his term of probation. Cf. J.M.H. v. State, 589 So.2d 394 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.