Case ID: f-appx_598/html/0853-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edward REESE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeanine SLATER; Dr. Mattioli; MS. Larken, Defendants-Appellees, and Kieran J. Shanahan; Reuben Young; W. David Guice; George T. Solomon; Carl Joyner; Cynthia Thornton; Frank Perry, Defendants.
    No. 15-6098.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 17, 2015.
    Decided: March 20, 2015.
    
      Edward Reese, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly D. Grande, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina; Nathan Douglas Childs, Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, Young Moore & Henderson, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appel-lees.
    Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edward' Reese appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights action for failure to exhaust his available administrative remedies. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Reese’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Reese has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.