Case ID: ad_114/html/0909-12.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

First Department,
    July, 1906.
    Arthur C. Booth, Respondent, v. William A. Milliken, Appellant.
    from an order denying an application to vacate a warrant of attachment. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Order filed.
   Per Curiam:

The order appealed from should be affirmed. We observe, however, that the undertaking here is inadequate, but that is a matter which the defendant can remedy by a proper application in the court below. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present &emdash; O'Brien, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Houghton, JJ.