Case ID: so2d_420/html/0651-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MIAMI-DADE WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY, Appellant, v. BISCAYA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Bonavida Condominium Owners Association, Inc., Bona-Vista Condominium Association, Inc., Bravura Condominium Association, Inc., Eldorado Towers Condominium Association, Inc., and Ensenada Condominium Association, Inc., Appellees.
    No. 81-2392.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 19, 1982.
    
      Worley & Harnage and Henry Harnage, Miami, for appellant.
    Howard M. Neu, North Miami, for appel-lees.
    Before NESBITT, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The partial summary judgment and order dismissing the appellant’s supplemental counterclaim, both of which were incorporated into the final judgment appealed from, are affirmed. The court properly construed the contract between Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Authority and the developer to preclude the Authority from requiring guaranty deposits from the condominium association. Dismissal of the supplemental counterclaim for declaratory judgment was nonprejudicial because it did not assert a compulsory counterclaim and therefore may be the subject of an independent action.

Affirmed.