Case ID: f-appx_618/html/0678-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alexander SHUKH, Plaintiff-Appellant v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC, Seagate Technology, Inc., Seagate Technology, Defendants-Appellees. Unknown Owners and Assignees, Defendant. Seagate Technology PLC, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 2015-1012.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    Oct. 2, 2015.
    Constantine John Gekas, Gekas Law Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
    Chad Drown, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Minneapolis, MN, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by David J.F. Gross, Charles Feeney Knapp, Elizabeth Cowan Wright, Aaron D. Van Oort; Calvin L. Litsey, East Palo Alto, CA.
    Before MOORE, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

In light of our holding in Shukh v. Seagate Technology, LLC, Case No. 14-1406, vacating and remanding in part the district court’s judgment on the merits against Alexander Shukh, we vacate and remand the district court’s costs judgment.

VACATED AND REMANDED

Costs

No costs.