Case ID: ad3d_7/html/0325-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Madelaine Stein, Respondent, v Gary S. Stein, Appellant.
    [775 NYS2d 850]
   Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Visitacion-Lewis, J.), entered January 17, 2003, which granted plaintiff pendente relief in a matrimonial action, and order, same court and Justice, entered October 3, 2003, which denied defendant’s motion for a downward modification, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant fails to show either exigent circumstances or a failure by the motion court to properly consider the factors specified in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6), § 237 (a) and § 240 (1-b) (c) and (f). His remedy for any perceived inequities in the award is a prompt trial (see Anonymous v Anonymous, 241 AD2d 353 [1997]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Sullivan and Marlow, JJ.