Case ID: sd_33/html/0142-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WHITING, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SORG et al., Appellants, v. WELLS, Respondent.
    (144 N. W. 918.)
    Appeal — Briefs—No Assignments of Error — Affirmance.
    Where appellant’s brief -contains no assignments of error, there is nothing for 'consideration by the appellate court; and the judgment will be affirmed.
    (Opinion filed January 12, 1914.)
    Appea-l from Circuit 'Court, Spink County. Hon. A uva ETayuor, Judge.
    Action 'by S. Jennie Sorg and' others against William Wells. From a judgment for defendant, and from an order denying a new trial, plaintiffs, -appeal.
    Affirmed.
    See, also, 32 S. D. 157, 142 N. W. 179.
    
      M. Moriarty, for Appellants.
    
      Sterling and Clark, for Respondent.
   WHITING, J.

We gather -from appellants’ brief thait the appeal herein- is from- the judgment of the trial count, and- also from an order 'denying a new trial. The purported bill of exceptions ■herein was by this court, upon motion of respondent, stricken from the record. There is left nothing upon wh-ioh the order denying- a new ¡trial -can be reviewed. Appellant’s brief contains no assignments of erors, and thus, presents no matter for our consideration; furthermore, the discussion contained in'their brief relates entirely to matters that could only be -considered' upon a record properly settled by the trial court.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.