Case ID: ohio-st-3d_71/html/1213-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Moyer, C.J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Berger et al., Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. City of Port Clinton, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.
    [Cite as Berger v. Port Clinton (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 1213.]
    (No. 93-1399
    Submitted October 12, 1994
    Decided December 27, 1994.)
    
      Spitler & Williams-Young Co., L.P.A., Steven M. Spitler, Marc G. Williams-Young and Debra M. Jennings, ■ for appellants and cross-appellees.
    
      Flynn, Py & Kruse, L.P.A., and John A. Coppeler, for appellee and cross-appellant.
   This cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., dissents.

Moyer, C.J.,

dissenting. I dissent. I would affirm the well-reasoned decision of the court of appeals.