Case ID: f-appx_56/html/0433-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mildred SINGH, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. William J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General, of the United States Postal Service; John E. Potter, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service, Defendants — Appellees.
    No. 01-56400.
    D.C. No. CV-00-11785-AHM.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 17, 2003.
    
    Decided Feb. 24, 2003.
    
      Before FRIEDMAN, KOZINSKI and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
    
      
       The Honorable Daniel M. Friedman, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Appellant Mildred Singh failed to raise a material issue of fact regarding her discrimination action, as her appeal to the EEOC was untimely. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.402(a). The district properly granted summary judgment in favor of the United States Postal Service. See O’Connor v. Boeing N. Am., Inc., 311 F.3d 1139, 1149 (9th Cir.2002); see also Foss v. Thompson, 242 F.3d 1131, 1133-34 (9th Cir.2001).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.