Case ID: so2d_541/html/0166-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. William MANGHAM, Appellee.
    No. 88-2105.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 11, 1989.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Susan Odzer Hugentugler, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.
    
      Before BARKDULL, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellee concedes that the sentence must be reversed because the trial court failed to give written reasons to support a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. See State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985); State v. Dixon, 539 So.2d 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Vickery, 536 So.2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Martinez, 534 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Wayda, 533 So.2d 939 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Adams, 528 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

The sentence is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.