Case ID: neb_61/html/0054-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Holcomb, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Philadelphia Mortgage & Trust Company, appellee, v. Buckstaff Brothers Manufacturing Company et al., appellants.
    Filed December 5, 1900.
    No. 9,318.
    ■Order of Sale: CoiXEIrwation: Limitation. A failure to return an order of sale in the execution of a decree in foreclosure proceeding’s within sixty days, is no sufficient reason for withholding- confirmation of a sale made thereunder.
    Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county. Heard below before Holmes, J.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    
      A. B. Coffroth, for appellants.
    
      S. L. Geisihardt, contra.
    
   Holcomb, J.

On a motion to confirm a sale of real estate made by the sheriff in pursuance of a decree entered in foreclosure proceedings, objections were interposed on the ground that the order of sale was not returned within sixty days. A failure to return an order of sale in the execution of a decree in foreclosure proceedings within sixty days is no sufficient reason for withholding confirmation of a sale made thereunder. Amoskeag Savings Bank v. Robbins, 53 Nebr., 776; Philadelphia Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Hutchins, 61 Nebr., 2, decided at the present sifting.

The judgment is

Affirmed.