Case ID: ad2d_13/html/0769-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ann G. Pennington, Respondent, v. Edmund Ziman, Appellant.
   Order entered on July 28, 1960, denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint under rule 106 and subdivision 4 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion granted, with $10 costs, with leave, however, for the plaintiff-respondent to replead, if so advised, upon a showing by allegation of ultimate facts that a rescission of the agreement would accomplish some proper purpose, since equity will not suffer the making of a vain arder. (Cf. Sivakoff v. Sivakoff, 280 App. Div. 106, 108.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.