Case ID: sw3d_448/html/0852-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Antwain D. GRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    WD 76324
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    ORDER FILED: November 18, 2014
    S. Kate Webber, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant
    Todd Smith, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent '
    Before Division One: Thomas H. Newton, P.J., Lisa White Hardwick, and Anthony Rex Gabbert, JJ.
   ORDER

Per Curiam:

Mr. Antwain D. Gray appeals the judgment denying a Rule 24.035 post-conviction motion. Mr. Gray claims that he relied on a statement from plea counsel as to the likely duration of his sentence when entering a guilty plea. He further claims that he was thereby prejudiced because, had he understood that the sentence could be longer than plea counsel stated, he would not have waived his right to a trial.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).