Case ID: f-appx_414/html/0022-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ron MOSLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S. OROSKI, Respondent-Appellee; Ron Mosley, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S. Oroski, Respondent-Appellee.
    Nos. 08-15327, 08-15389.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Jan. 31, 2011.
    David Shapiro, Oakland, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
    Ron Mosley, San Quentin, CA, pro se.
    Heather M. Heckler, Esquire, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
    D.C. No. CV-05-04260-TEH, Northern District of California, San Francisco.
    Before: ALARCÓN and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
   In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Swarthout v. Cooke, -U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 859, 178 L.Ed.2d 732 (2011) (per curiam), the disposition filed on November 24, 2010 is withdrawn. Further proceedings are stayed pending final resolution of Cooke v. Solis, 606 F.3d 1206 (9th Cir.2010), and Clay v. Kane, 384 Fed.Appx. 544 (9th Cir.2010), in this court. The parties are requested to file a notice memorandum with the Clerk of this court as soon as decisions have been rendered in these cases.