Case ID: ohio-st-3d_28/html/0308-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sheipline et al., Appellants, v. Like, Appellee.
    [Cite as Sheipline v. Like (1986), 28 Ohio St. 3d 308.]
    No. 86-4
    Decided December 22, 1986.
    
      Williams, Jilek & Lafferty Co., L.P.A., Martin W. Williams and Drew R. Masse, for appellants.
    
      Gooding, Evans & Huffman, Lawrence S. Huffman and Matthew C. Huffman, for appellee.
   The judgment of the court of appeals in case No. 1-84-38, pursuant to appellants’ Proposition of Law No. 1 with respect to the issue of due process, is hereby reversed on authority of Mominee v. Scherbarth (1986), 28 Ohio St. 3d 270, and the cause is remanded to the trial court.

Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown and Douglas, JJ., concur.

Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.