Case ID: ad2d_212/html/1053-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Patricia J. Tedesco, Appellant, v Leonard J. Murawski, Respondent.
    [624 NYS2d 1007]
   —Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion denied. Memorandum: In the absence of "special, unusual or extraordinary circumstances spelled out in factual detail”, Supreme Court should not have permitted a physical examination of plaintiff after the note of issue and statement of readiness had been filed (Laudico v Sears, Roebuck & Co., 125 AD2d 960, 961; see, 22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]; Siegel, NY Prac §370 [2d ed]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J.—Discovery.) Present—Denman, P. J., Lawton, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.