Case ID: nys_116/html/1134-10.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DUNCAN, Respondent, v. NASSAU ELECTRIC R. CO. et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    April 23, 1909.)
    Action by Lorenzo Duncan against the Nassau Electric Railroad Company and the Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment reversed on re-argument, and new trial granted before the court, costs to abide the event, unless the plaintilf consent to reduce the damages to $3,000, in which case the judgment, as so reduced, is affirmed, without costs here. See, also, 127 App. Div. 252, 111 N. Y. Supp. 210.