Case ID: nys_114/html/1147-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SHOECRAFT, Respondent, v. LOCKE INSULATOR MFG. CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    January 6, 1909.)
    Action by Lee J. Shoecraft against the Locke Insulator Manufacturing Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

MCLENNAN, P. j., and WILLIAMS, J., dissent, upon the ground that plaintiff as matter of law assumed the risk, which was obvious and which he voluntarily assumed; this being an action at common law.