Case ID: sw3d_482/html/0451-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dejuan L. TUCKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    ED 102870
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    
    Filed: February 9, 2016
    Maleaner Harvey, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Gregory L. Barnes, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson, City, MO 65102, for respondent.
    Before: Philip M. Hess, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J. and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

DeJuan Tucker (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s, judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs .of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memor randum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).