Case ID: f-appx_441/html/0153-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary Ann TEASLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patrick R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General United States Postal Service (Capital Metro Area) Agency, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 11-1401.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 28, 2011.
    Decided: Aug. 1, 2011.
    Mary Ann Teasley, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mary Ann Teasley appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint filed pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Teasley v. Donahoe, No. 1:11-cv-00196-AJT-JFA (E.D.Va. Mar. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.