Case ID: sw3d_427/html/0891-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jackie ROBINSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 99992.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    April 8, 2014.
    Amanda Page Faerber, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Chris Foster, Attorney General, Gabriel Etter Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jackie Robinson appeals from the motion court’s “Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment” denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 following an evidentiary hearing where he alleged ineffective assistance of plea counsel. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).