Case ID: sw3d_520/html/0837-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ryann GREENHOFF, Respondent, v. Jennifer GREENHOFF, Appellant.
    No. ED 104802
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, NORTHERN DIVISION.
    Filed: June 30, 2017
    Rachel E. Reagan-Purschke, Union, Missouri, For Appellant.
    Ryann Greenhoff, Union, Missouri, For Respondent.
    Before Philip M. Hess, C.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., Colleen Dolan, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jennifer Greenhoff (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Franklin County, in favor of Ryann Green-hoff (Respondent), denying her motion to set aside the parties’ judgment of dissolution. Appellant’s sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying her motion because she met the requirements of Rule 74.06(b)(2) to set aside the parties’ judgment of dissolution on the basis of fraud. Finding no error, we affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).