Case ID: f-appx_142/html/0794-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles Edward SCRIVENS, Petitioner — Appellant, v. B.A. BLEDSOE, Warden; K.M. White; Harrell Watts, Administrator, Respondents — Appellees.
    No. 05-6053.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 17, 2005.
    Decided Sept. 16, 2005.
    Charles Edward Scrivens, Appellant pro se.
    Before LUTTIG, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM.

Charles Edward Scrivens, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error because the claim is foreclosed by our recent decision in Yi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 412 F.3d 526 (4th Cir.2005). Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the district court. See Scrivens v. Bledsoe, No. CA-04-725-7 (W.D.Va. Dec. 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED