Case ID: cust-ct_2/html/0771-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 41682.
    Protests 42409-G, etc., of Campbell, Metzger & Jacobson (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel articles embroidered and trimmed with laces similar to those the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396), filet laces the same as those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), and Normandy laces like those passed upon in United States v. Amrein (26 id. 353, C. A. D. 40) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.