Case ID: ohio-law-abs_43/html/0598-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HAYMAN, Admx., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
    Ohio Appeals, Second District, Franklin County.
    No. 3804.
    Decided May 28, 1945.
    Messrs. Burr, Porter, Stanley & Treffinger, Columbus, for defendant-appellee, and for the motion.
    Messrs. Benoy, Saxby & Sebastian, Columbus, for plaintiff-appellant, and contra the motion.
   OPINION

BY THE COURT:

Submitted on motion of the defendant-appellee to dismiss the appeal, because no assignment of errors as required by the Code and by Rule VII of the Rules of this Court, has been filed within the time prescribed by law and the claimed ground or grounds of error is or are not readily ascertainable from an examination of the record and the brief.

The motion will be overruled. We believe the question presented is readily ascertainable from the brief and the files in cause.

HORNBECK, P. J., GEIGER and MILLER, JJ., concur.