Case ID: or-app_226/html/0471-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Submitted February 6,
    remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed March 11, 2009
    STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RUDOLPH I. RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    
    Malheur County Circuit Court
    04085218C; A137789
    204 P3d 119
    Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Stephanie Hortsch, Deputy Public Defender, Appellate Division, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
    Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Anna M. Joyce, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
    Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong, Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Defendant, who pleaded guilty to attempted sexual abuse in the first degree, which is a Class C felony, see ORS 163.427(2) and ORS 161.405(2)(c), and who was, consequently, placed on probation, appeals. He contends that the trial court erred when it imposed a 60-month prison sentence after revoking his probation. The state concedes that the trial court so erred and specifically acknowledges that, “[b]ecause the [trial] court originally sentenced defendant in gridblock 6-1, which carries a presumptive sentence of probation, the maximum sentence authorized upon revocation was 6 months.” The state’s concession is well founded, see, e.g., State v. Yarborough, 223 Or App 608, 196 P3d 1032 (2008); State v. Bolf, 217 Or App 606, 176 P3d 1287 (2008), and we accept that concession.

Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.