Case ID: f-appx_331/html/0518-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Julian Rodriguez ALONZO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 06-72373.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 11, 2009.
    
    Filed Aug. 13, 2009.
    Julian Rodriguez Alonzo, Anaheim, CA, pro se.
    Kurt B. Larson, Esquire, Stacy Stiffel Paddack, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
    Before KLEINFELD, M. SMITH, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously Finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Julian Rodriguez Alonzo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order rejecting his motion to reopen for lack of jurisdiction. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing de novo questions of law, Singh v. INS, 213 F.3d 1050, 1052 (9th Cir.2000), we deny the petition for review.

The BIA properly rejected Rodriguez Alonzo’s motion to reopen for lack of jurisdiction. See Matter of Mladineo, 14 I. & N. Dec. 591 (BIA 1974).

Petitioner’s due process claims are unavailing. See id,, at 592.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.