Case ID: f-appx_670/html/0821-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennever LIVINGSTON, a/k/a Fatta, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-6952
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: November 17, 2016
    Decided: November 22, 2016
    Dennever Livingston, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia; Darryl James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dennever Livingston appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a modification of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Livingston, No. 2:97-cr-00039-HCM-41 (E.D. Va. filed June 6, 2016; entered June 7, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED