Case ID: misc_22/html/0768-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The Weehawken Wharf Co., Respondent, v. The Knickerbocker Coal Co., Appellant.
    Appeal from an order vacating an attachment.
    Edwards & Bryan, for appellant.
    James R. Rogers, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion to vacate the attachment the

The order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.' . The papers upon which said attachment'was. granted were more than: sufficient.

Present: Fitzsimons, Oh. J., O’Dwveb and MoGabthy, JJ.

Order affirmed,, with costs.