Case ID: ga-app_36/html/0120-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

17593.
    Waldrip v. The State.
    Decided November 9, 1926.
    Incest; from Crisp superior court — Judge Crum. July 3, 1926.
    
      Dorris & Brown, for plaintiff in error.
    
      J. B. Wall, solicitor-general, Strozier & Gower, contra.
    Criminal Law, 16 C. J. p. 1180, n. 74; p. 1217, n. 45; 17 C. J. p. 271, n. 41.
   Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; there was some evidence authorizing the verdict, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.