Case ID: ohio-st-3d_88/html/0492-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Cook, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Klosterman Baking Company, Inc., Appellee, v. Administrator, Ohio Bureau of Employment Services, Appellee; Bakery, Confectionery and Tobacco Workers’ International Union Local # 57 AFL-CIO, An Unincorporated Association, et al., Appellants.
    [Cite as Klosterman Baking Co. v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Serv. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 492.]
    (No. 99-991
    Submitted March 7, 2000
    Decided May 24, 2000.)
    
      Graydon, Head & Ritchey and Daniel E. Burke, for appellee Klosterman Baking Co.
    
      Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and David E. Lefton, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Administrator, Ohio Bureau of Employment Services'.
    
      Leonard S. Sigall, for appellants.
   The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Bays v. Shenango Co. (1990), 53 Ohio St.3d 132, 559 N.E.2d 740.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Cook, J.,

dissenting. The court of appeals heard this case twice, once after remand. In both decisions, it cited Bays v. Shenango Co. (1990), 53 Ohio St.3d 132, 559 N.E.2d 740. Nevertheless, the majority of this court resolves this appeal by reversing and citing the same case the court of appeals cited in both of its decisions. Even if I were to agree that this case should be reversed, I surely would think that more than a citation to Bays v. Shenango would be necessary.

In any event, I also differ from the majority in that I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. I, therefore, respectfully dissent.

Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.