Case ID: cal-unrep_3/html/0265-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WHITE v. WHITE.
    No. 13,331;
    May 9, 1890.
    
      24 Pac. 276.
    Appeal—Interlineations in Transcript—Appeal.—An appeal will not be dismissed because of interlineations in the transcript of the record.
    Appeal.—An Order Allowing Alimony is appealable.
    APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; T. K. Wilson, Judge.
    E. D. Wheeler and Barclay Henley for appellant; Henry E. Highton, H. C. McPike and J. A. Cooper for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal from the judgment in this case on the ground of written interlineations in the transcript of the record. This is not ground for dismissing the appeal, nor was it so held in Green v. McMann, 79 Cal. 561, 21 Pac. 964.

There is also a motion to dismiss the appeal from an order allowing alimony. The order in this case is within the decision in Sharon v. Sharon, 67 Cal. 185, 7 Pac. 456, 635, 8 Pac. 709. We adhere to the ruling in that case. The certificate of the clerk of the superior court to the transcript is in all respects sufficient. Both motions are denied.