Case ID: sw_283/html/0480-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HAUGEN et al. v. JOHNSON et al.
    (Application No. 14668.)
    (Supreme Court of Texas.
    May 12, 1926.)
    On Application for Writ of Error to Court of Civil Appeals, Eirst Supreme Judicial District.
    Dismissed.
    For opinion below, see 282 S. W. 1115.
    Rose & Sample, of Edna, for applicants.
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the trial court was correctly affirmed, regardless of whether the testimony of C. A. Johnson was prohibited by article 3690 of the Revised Statutes 1911.

The application for writ of error will therefore be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.