Case ID: nj-eq_120/html/0607-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marie F. Sweeney, respondent, v. Grant Silk Manufacturing Company, Incorporated, appellant.
    [Decided October 2d, 1936.]
    
      Mr. Edward F. Merrey, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. Barnett Berr, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in 119 N. J. Eq. 321,

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Eaeeerty, Cole, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.