Case ID: ala-app_22/html/0299-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SAMFORD, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(115 So. 72)
    THOMPSON v. STATE.
    (1 Div. 730.)
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    Jan. 10, 1928.
    Tisdale J. Touart, of Mobile, for appellant.
    Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State. ■
    No briefs reached the Reporter.
   SAMFORD, J.

But two exceptions are reserved for review, and they relate to the oral charge of the court. A defendant may be an accessory to the possession of a still, just' as he may be an accessory to any other crime, and if one is in possession of a still, and is aided and abetted by another, both are equally guilty. The court’s charge was free from error, and, there being no error apparent on the trial, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

The sentence is indefinite, and therefore the cause is remanded to the circuit court for proper sentence. Tuggle v. State, 19 Ala. App. 539, 98 So. 700.

Affirmed, and remanded for sentence.