Case ID: misc_153/html/0840-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Fannie D. Harris, Appellant, v. New York Athletic Club, Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    December 6, 1934.
    
      Albert Harris, for the appellant.
    
      William A. Earl, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Section 1078 of the Civil Practice Act does not prohibit the plaintiff from pursuing her cause of action on a coupon attached to a bond securing a second mortgage while the action is pending to foreclose a first mortgage. (See Reichert v. Stilwell, 172 N. Y. 83.) It was, therefore, error to deny summary judgment.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted.

All concur; present, Lydon, Hammer and Shientag, JJ,