Case ID: nys_151/html/1141-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

POWLOWSKI, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    March 3, 1915.)
    Action by Louis Powlowski, an infant, etc., against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence upon the question of the defendant’s negligence and the plaintiff’s contributory negligence, that the weight of the evidence supports the claim that the plaintiff attempted to board the train while it was in motion, and that he was injured through his own carelessness. See, also, 150 N. Y. Supp. 1107.