Case ID: so2d_350/html/1141-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

King Edward BRILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. GG-177.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Oct. 24, 1977.
    
      King Edward Brill, in pro per.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Patti Englander, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant could have raised his complaint concerning the jury instructions on direct appeal. That issue is therefore not properly raised in a motion to vacate judgment and sentence. Ashley v. State, 350 So.2d 839 (Fla.1st DCA 1977).

AFFIRMED.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and MELVIN, JJ., concur.