Case ID: so2d_781/html/1083-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lennard LaPoint JENKINS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. SC00-310.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    March 15, 2001.
    
      James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and S.C. Van Voorhees and Barbara C. Davis, Assistant Public Defenders, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, FL, for Petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Kellie A. Nielan, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, FL, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of Jenkins v. State, 747 So.2d 997 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), on the basis of an alleged express and direct conflict with our decision in State v. Houck, 652 So.2d 359 (Fla.1995). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted in this case. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this cause.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ„ concur.