Case ID: ala-app_43/html/0354-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "CATES, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

190 So.2d 566
    Ex parte Robert E. ROBERSON.
    2 Div. 147.
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    Sept. 27, 1966.'
    Robert E. Roberson, pro se.
    Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and Jas. H. Davis, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
   CATES, Judge.

This is an original action for mandamus.

Petitioner sought post conviction review while he still had time to take a direct appeal. The circuit court correctly dismissed his petition for coram nobis.

Mandamus is not a substitute for an appeal.

The petition on its face requires that it be and, on motion of the Attorney General, it is hereby

Dismissed.