Case ID: nys_82/html/1115-12.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SLADE, Appellant, v. HALE, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    May 19, 1903.)
    Action by William H. Slade against Gertrude A. Hale, as executrix, etc., and individually.
   PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the court has no jurisdiction of this action against the defendant as executrix; she being a foreign executrix, appointed and acting under the laws of the state of Illinois. Defendant, as such executrix, did not waive her objection to the jurisdiction of the court by appearing in the action and demurring for lack of jurisdiction. Flandrow v. Hammond, 13 App. Div. 325, 43 N. Y. Supp. 143; Wheelock v. Lee, 74 N. Y. 495. Also held, that this action is not maintainable against the defendant as executrix of an executor. Also held, that the complaint does not state, a cause of action against the defendant individually.