Case ID: so2d_275/html/0238-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Barbara M. Lenz HAYDEN, Petitioner, v. Francis D. CIPOLATO et al., Respondents.
    No. 42884.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    March 28, 1973.
    Heller & Kaplan, Miami, for petitioner.
    Joseph G. Weiss, South Miami, and Fred A. Jones, Jr., Miami, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and dispensed with argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, F. S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.