Case ID: njl_97/html/0324-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOSEPH FELDMAN, APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM H. HALPIN, RESPONDENT.
    Submitted December 5, 1921
    Decided February 9, 1922.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 96 N. J. L. 75.
    
    For the appellant, Isador Haber.
    
    For the respondent, Charles William Kappas.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance —■ The Chancellor, Chief Justioe, Bergen, Black, Katzenbach, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 9.

For reversal — Swayze, Parker, JJ. 2.