Case ID: f-appx_223/html/0807-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MICHAEL W. McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Teddy Leroy BAILEY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-6356.
    United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
    May 2, 2007.
    Jay Farber, Office of the United States Attorney, Oklahoma City, OK, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Teddy Leroy Bailey, Texarkana, TX, pro se.
    Before BRISCOE, McKAY, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER AND JUDGMENT

MICHAEL W. McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Teddy Leroy Bailey filed what he styled an “Independent Bill In Equity For Relief from Judgment and Action In Aequitas Et In Personam” challenging his previously imposed sentence. The United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma correctly dismissed this action for want of jurisdiction. That judgment is AFFIRMED. Appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. 
      
       After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). This case is therefore submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.