Case ID: ny-2d_68/html/0788-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John W. Colgan et al., Appellants, v Town of Hillsdale, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
    Decided September 9, 1986
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      David L. Krech for appellants.
    
      Carl Rosenbloom for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the defendant town’s motion for summary judgment denied.

Although municipalities have no duty to preserve the lateral support to adjacent land in the construction and maintenance of highways and roads (Radcliff’s Executors v Mayor, 4 NY 195, 203; see, New York Steam Co. v Foundation Co., 195 NY 43, 50), municipalities are liable for damages to adjoining property proximately caused by their negligence in construction and maintenance (Radcliff’s Executors v Mayor, supra; Vanguard Tours v Town of Yorktown, 83 AD2d 866). Since factual issues exist concerning the defendant’s conduct in maintaining the drainage ditches and backslope adjacent to plaintiffs’ property, summary judgment is inappropriate (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557; cf. Olan v Farrell Lines, 64 NY2d 1092, 1093).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr., concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, etc.