Case ID: nj-eq_93/html/0225-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alfred S. Brown, appellant, v. Emanuel Simandl, respondent.
    [Decided September 30th, 1921.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Fielder, and reported in 93 N. J. Eq. 119.
    
    
      Mr. Edward. S. Atwater, Jr., for the appellant.
    
      Mr. I-Iarold Simandl, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisot-i, Black, Katzenbach, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Gardner, Aokerson, Van Bus-kirk — 1-1.

For reversal — None.