Case ID: sw_179/html/1186-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HARPER, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RICHARDSON v. STATE.
    (No. 3820.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Nov. 10, 1915.)
    Criminal Law <&wkey;1134 — Exceptions — Questions Presented por Review.
    Where no exceptions were reserved to the introduction of any testimony, nor to the charge of the court as given, and no special charge was requested, the only question presented for review w.as the sufficiency of the testimony.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2587, 2653, 2986-2998, 3056, 3067-3071; Dec. Dig. &wkey;1134.]
    Appeal from District Court, Trinity County.
    Brit Richardson was convicted of selling intoxicating liquor in prohibition territory, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    J. A. Platt, Dist. Atty. of Groveton, and C. C. McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   HARPER, J.

Appellant was convicted of selling intoxicating liquor in prohibition territory, and his punishment assessed at one year’s confinement in the state penitentiary.

No exceptions were reserved, to the introduction of any testimony, nor to the charge of the court as given. No special charge was requested. So the only question presented for review is the sufficiency of the testimony. Tom Kirkwood testified he secured a bottle of whisky from appellant and paid him a dollar for it.

The judgment is affirmed.