Case ID: so2d_441/html/0183-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BOALT PROPERTIES, INC., and William E. Hutton, III, Appellants, v. RONALD J. GORDON-SMITH CORP., a Florida corporation, Ronald J. Gordon-Smith, Joseph M. Demauro and Annette Demauro, Appellees.
    No. 82-2446.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Nov. 23, 1983.
    James H. Schnare, II, Fleming, Haile & Shaw, Palm Beach, for appellants.
    James A. Farrel, Steel, Hector, Davis, Burns & Middleton, Palm Beach, and Jane Kreusler-Walsh and Larry Klein, West Palm Beach, for appellees, Ronald J. Gordon-Smith Corp., and Ronald J. Gordon-Smith, individually.
    Dean J. Rosenbach of Lewis, Vegosen & Rosenbach, Palm Beach, and Jane Kreusler-Walsh and Larry Klein, West Palm Beach, for appellees, Joseph M. Demauro and Annette Demauro.
   PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amended Complaint, based upon the theory of an intentional interference with a business relationship, was dismissed. Plaintiffs appeal. We reverse.

We have surveyed the complaint, mindful that the well-pleaded allegations must be accepted as true. Suffice it to say, we feel that its content was legally sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss. We reverse upon authority of Franklin v. Brown, 159 So.2d 893 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964); Mead Corp. v. Mason, 191 So.2d 592 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1966); Symon v. J. Rolfe Davis, Inc., 245 So.2d 278 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971); and Krieger v. Ocean Properties, Ltd., 387 So.2d 1012 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

REVERSED

DOWNEY, BERANEK and WALDEN, JJ., concur.