Case ID: a3d_151-2/html/0384-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John DOE v. TOWN OF WEST HARTFORD et al.
    Supreme Court of Connecticut.
    Decided November 8, 2016
    Scott M. Karsten, Michael R. McPherson and Laura Pascale Zaino, in support of the petition.
    Josephine Smalls Miller, in opposition.
    The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 168 Conn.App. 354, 147 A.3d 1083 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:
    "1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court's grant of the defendants' motion for summary judgment on the basis of its determination that a genuine issue of material fact existed with respect to the availability of the savings statute, General Statutes § 52-593a ?
    "2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that § 52-593a is available to save a cause of action despite the failure of the serving officer to endorse on the officer's return the date of delivery of the process to such officer pursuant to § 52-593a(b) ?"