Case ID: nj-eq_83/html/0341-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Irma Leigh Earl, petitioner and respondent, v. Binney Woodward Earl, appellant and defendant.
    [Submitted March 23d, 1914.
    Decided June 18th, 1914.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, whose opinion is reported in 81 N. J. Eq. m.
    
    
      Mr. Theodore Baches, for the petitioner and respondent.
    
      Messrs. Gashill é Gctskill, for the appellant and defendant.-
   Per Curiam.

A consideration of the proofs in this cause satisfies us of the soundness of the conclusion reached by the vice-chancellor. The decree under review will be affirmed.

For affirmance — 1The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, .Trencharb, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Vrebenburgh, White, Heppenhetmer — 12.

For reversal — Hone.