Case ID: ad3d_135/html/1248-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tige Smith, Jr., Appellant.
    [23 NYS3d 593]
   Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Richards, J.), rendered August 18, 2014, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defendant was sentenced to a prison term of five years and two years of postrelease supervision following his plea of guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. His sole contention on appeal is that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive. We disagree. County Court made no sentence commitment and imposed a prison term that was less than the maximum permitted by statute (see Penal Law § 70.70 [2] [a] [i]). Notably, while this matter was pending, defendant absconded and was twice arrested and convicted upon a charge of assault in the third degree. Further, a review of the presentence investigation report reflects defendant’s extensive drug-related history. We find no abuse of discretion or extraordinary circumstances warranting modification of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Lasanta, 89 AD3d 1324 [2011]; People v Velazquez, 67 AD3d 1124, 1124 [2009], lv denied 14 NY3d 894 [2010]; People v Williams, 65 AD3d 1423, 1424 [2009]).

Peters, P.J., Garry, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.