Case ID: minn_139/html/0490-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JAMES B. BRADSHAW AND ANOTHER v. J. G. SIBERT.
    
    December 14, 1917.
    No. 20,646.
    Guaranty — law of the case.
    On a second trial the evidence did not change the material facts or qualify defendant’s liability as expressed in the written contract. The decision on the former appeal is therefore followed. [Reporter.]
    After the former appeal reported in 134 Minn. 186, 158 N. W. 830, the case was tried upon stipulated facts before Catherwood, X, who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of plaintiffs for $200.10 and interest. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, defendant appealed.
    Affirmed.
    
      Henry A. Morgan, John F. D. Meighen and Bennett O. Knudson, for appellant.
    
      David R. Thomas, for respondent.
    
      
       Reported in 165 N. W. 1074.
    
   Per Curiam.

This cause was before the court on a former appeal. 134 Minn. 186, 158 N. W. 830. It was then held that the contract involved in the action was a continuing guaranty, subjecting defendant to liability in the sum of $400. On a second trial of the action the letter referred to in the former opinion was received in addition to the evidence as it appeared on the first appeal. We are of opinion that the letter in no way changes the material facts, or in any way qualifies defendant’s liability as expressed in the written contract, and the former decision is therefore followed as the law of the case.

Judgment affirmed.