Case ID: sw2d_986/html/0922-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Craig D. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 73700.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Nov. 24, 1998.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 16, 1999.
    David C. Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Kenneth P. Ferguson, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., C.J., KENT E. KAROHL, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, Senior Judge.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Craig D. Taylor appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).