Case ID: so2d_732/html/0323-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael Jon DiPIETRO, et al., Petitioners, v. David GRIEFER, et ux., Respondents.
    No. 93,038.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    April 22, 1999.
    Edward D. Schuster of Massey, Coican & Schuster, LLC, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, and Paula C. Kessler and Raymond O. Holton of Kessler, Massey, Catri, Holton & Kessler, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Petitioners.
    Arthur J. England, Jr., Paul C. Savage, and Brenda Kay Supple of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami, Florida, for Respondents.
    Jack W. Shaw, Jr., Orlando, Florida, for Florida Defense Lawyers Association, Amicus Curiae.
    Philip M. Burlington of Caruso, Burlington, Bohn & Compiani, P.A., West Palm Beach, Florida, for Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers, Amicus Curiae.
   PER CURIAM.

We accepted jurisdiction to review Griefer v. DiPietro, 708 So.2d 666 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), in order to resolve what appeared to be express and direct conflict with Alvarado v. Rice, 614 So.2d 498 (Fla. 1993), and Rockman v. Barnes, 672 So.2d 890 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). See Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. However, upon closer examination, we find no conflict and find review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ„ concur.

ANSTEAD, J., recused.