Case ID: ga_181/html/0103-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Atkinson, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bowman v. Darby.
    No. 10596.
    September 20, 1935.
    
      Saffold & Sharpe, for plaintiff. B. P. Jaclcson, for defendant.
   Atkinson, Justice.

The sworn pleadings were read as evidence. Other evidence was also 'introduced by affidavits. On the whole it appears that there was material conflict, and the discretion in refusing an interlocutory injunction will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.