Case ID: fla_113/html/0441-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Spero Zepatos v. Speros George Tragas.
    151 So. 889.
    Decision Filed January 2, 1934.
    
      D. C. Hull and Hull, Landis & Whitehair, for Appellant;
    
      Roger H. West and Sholtz, Green & West, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the order appointing a receiver; it is', therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Brown, J. J., concur.

Ellis and Buford, J. J., dissent.