Case ID: ad2d_202/html/0161-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Luigi Giustino et al., Appellants, v Hollymatic Corporation et al., Defendants, and Siegmeister Saw Service, Inc., Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)
    [608 NYS2d 179]
   —Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered January 20, 1993, which granted the motion by defendant Siegmeister Saw Service, Inc. ("Siegmeister”) for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff has submitted no evidence which would demonstrate that the defendant Siegmeister was negligent in making any of the requested repairs to the meat compressing machine which caused plaintiff’s injury, and in the absence of any evidence that Siegmeister had a contract with plaintiff’s employer for routine or systematic maintenance of the machine, Siegmeister as an independent repairer/contractor, had no duty to install safety devices or to warn plaintiff’s employer of any purported defect (Ayala v V & O Press Co., 126 AD2d 229, 235-236, citing Vermette v Kenworth Truck Co., 68 NY2d 714, 717). Absent such duty or other proof of negligence, summary judgment was properly granted. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Wallach and Tom, JJ.