Case ID: ny-2d_59/html/1012-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Hoan Holding Co., Appellant, v Daniel W. Joy, as Commissioner of the Department of Housing Preservation and Development, Respondent, and Homer Price, Intervenor-Respondent.
    Decided July 7, 1983
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Joseph Gaier, P. C., for appellant.
    
      Harry Michelson and Alan W. Ginsberg for respondent.
    
      Fred Weinstein for intervenor-respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs. On this record, it cannot be said that the commissioner’s determination that the landlord had failed to prove continuous owner occupancy for a period of one year (Administrative Code of City of New York, § Y51-3.0, subd e, par 2, cl [i], subcl [3]; New York City Rent and Eviction Regulations, § 2, subd f, par [11]) lacks a rational basis.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.