Case ID: ohio-law-abs_5/html/0074-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 92
    GEIGER v. KANIG
    No. 20241.
    Supreme Court
    On motion to certify.
    Dock. Dec. 31, 1926,
    5 Abs. 27.
    1063. SALES — Can one who has inspected merchandise before consummation of sale, thereafter rescind on ground of false representation of vendor as to quantity of goods, upon alleging that such misrepresentation preceded the inspection?
    Attorneys — Chas. Gallinger and J. W. Mc-Carron for Geiger; E. J. Myers and W. J. Schwenck for Kanig; all of Bucyrus,
   The contention in the Supreme Court is concerning the question of rescission of sales contract for false misrepresentation upon ground that such misrepresentation occurred prior to the time of inspection.