Case ID: so2d_413/html/0155-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Willie Charles BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 81-1379, 81-1380 and 81-1381.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 28, 1982.
    Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and Robert F. Moeller, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael J. Kotler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s probation was revoked for violating conditions (f), (h), and (k). Because no evidence was presented to prove a violation of conditions (f) and (k), we order the finding of a violation of those conditions stricken from the order revoking appellant’s probation. Otherwise, we affirm the order and the judgment and sentence.

SCHEB, C. J., and HOBSON and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.