Case ID: f-appx_564/html/0273-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lennie R. SENTER, Plaintiff-Appellant v. STERICYCLE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 13-3511.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 7, 2014.
    Filed: July 11, 2014.
    Lennie R. Senter, Urbandale, IA, pro se.
    Steven Hamann, Cara J. Ottenweller, Vedder & Price, Chicago, IL, Jonathan Paul Norrie, Bassford & Remele, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before BYE, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Lennie R. Senter appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment in his Title VII action against his former employer, Stericycle, Inc. (Stericy-cle). Upon de novo review, we agree with the district court that Stericycle met its burden of showing that there were no genuine issues of material fact, and that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Senter’s claims that he was subjected to racial harassment and discrimination, and that he suffered retaliation in violation of Title VIL See Whisenhunt v. Sw. Bell Tel., 573 F.3d 565, 568 (8th Cir.2009). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.