Case ID: us_562/html/1269-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 10-8196.
    No. 10-8228.
    No. 10-8516.
    Tomey et ux. v. Lambdin. Tucker et al. v. City of Los Angeles, California. Seisman v. Consumer Protection Division of the Office of the Attorney General of Maryland.
   Ct. Sp. App. Md.;

C. A. 9th Cir.; and

Ct. Sp. App. Md. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until March 28, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.