Case ID: or-app_96/html/0288-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted March 24,
    on appeal, modified; affirmed as modified; affirmed on cross-appeal April 26, 1989
    In the Matter of the Marriage of O'DAY, Respondent - Cross-Appellant, and O'DAY, Appellant - Cross-Respondent.
    
    (CV 87-0752; CA A49659)
    772 P2d 451
    Robert G. Ringo, Corvallis, argued the cause for appellant - cross-respondent. On the brief were Patrick L. Hadlock and Ringo & Stuber, P.C., Corvallis.
    Ronald L. Marek, Corvallis, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent - cross-appellant.
    Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Wife appeals a dissolution judgment and challenges the trial court’s spousal support award of “$400 per month from April to December, 1988; $300 per month beginning December, 1988, and each year successively $200 and $100 per month ending December, 1991.” On de novo review, we conclude that spousal support for 1991 should be $200 per month, and that it should continue at that level, ending in December, 1993.

Husband cross-appeals the property division, and we affirm on the cross-appeal.

On appeal, judgment modified to award wife spousal support of $200 per month for 1991,1992 and 1993, ending in December, 1993; affirmed as modified; affirmed on cross-appeal. Costs to wife on appeal and cross-appeal.