Case ID: sw2d_58/html/0820-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

F. H. PIERSON et al. v. Hon. Royall R. WATKINS et al.
    Motion No. 10689.
    Supreme Court of Texas.
    April 1, 1933.
    James V. Allred, Atty. Gen., and Maurice Cheek, Willis E. Gresham, and A. R. Stout, Asst. Attys. Gen., for relators.
   PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to file the petition for writ of mandamus and prohibition is overruled, without prejudice to the rights of relators to again present the subject-matter of the application . to this court, should it be subsequently shown that the available remedies in the district court and Court of Civil Appeals are inadequate to protect the rights of the re-lators.