Case ID: sw2d_886/html/0218-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cary W. LANG, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., and Union Pacific Railroad Co., Defendants/Appellants.
    No. 65373.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Nov. 1, 1994.
    Stephen M. Buckley, St. Louis, for appellants.
    Jerome J. Schliehter, Robert S. Bogard, Steven L. Groves, Schliehter, Bogard, & Denton, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this jury-tried ease, defendants appeal a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $185,000 in an action pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51, et seq.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).