Case ID: f-appx_20/html/0241-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric Arthur WALTON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 01-6930.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 3, 2001.
    Decided Oct. 16, 2001.
    Eric Arthur Walton, pro se.
    Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Eric Arthur Walton appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Walton, No. CR-77-83 (N.D.W.Va. May 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.