Case ID: njl_123/html/0265-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CARL ASCHENBACH, APPELLANT, v. THE INHABITANTS OF THE CITY OF PLAINFIELD ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Argued May 17, 1939
    Decided September 22, 1939.
    For the appellant, Joseph J. Mutnik.
    
    For the respondent, William Newcorn.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.