Case ID: or-app_53/html/0432-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted May 27,
    affirmed August 3, 1981
    In the Matter of the Marriage of LIEUALLEN, Appellant, and LIEUALLEN, Respondent.
    
    
      (No. 22,558, CA 18260)
    631 P2d 1391
    Garry L. Reynolds, Hermiston, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Morrison, Reynolds & Bloom, P.C., Hermiston.
    W. Eugene Hallman, Pendleton, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Mautz & Hallman, Pendleton.
    Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Van Hoomissen, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s division of the property was equitable given the duration of the marriage and the parties’ contributions to it. We will not modify a property division unless we are convinced we can make a significantly preferable disposition. Frishkoff and Frischkoff, 45 Or App 1033, 610 P2d 831 (1980).

Affirmed. No costs to either party.