Case ID: so2d_676/html/0103-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "CALOGERO, C.J., and LEMMON, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Louisiana v. Jimmie EMERSON.
    No. 96-KK-1788.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    July 18, 1996.
   In re Emerson, Jimmie; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW96 1168; Parish of Ascension, 23rd Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 9458.

Denied.

CALOGERO, C.J., and LEMMON, J.,

concurs in the denial insofar as the application seeks to require the trial judge to perform an in camera comparison. Insofar as the application seeks to require the district attorney to compare the grand jury testimony to the witnesses’ other statements, the district attorney has stated that his inspection has revealed no inconsistencies.

JOHNSON, J., not on panel.