Case ID: ad_279/html/1089-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anatole Buxhoeveden, Appellant, v. Estonian State Bank, Respondent, et al., Defendants.
   While we agree with the determination by the trial court that plaintiff’s Exhibit 1 is inadmissible and that plaintiff did not establish a prima facie case, we may not sustain the dismissal of the plaintiff’s complaint. Not having renewed its motions to dismiss and for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence, defendant bank did not preserve its right to move for such relief after a verdict had been received, pursuant to section 457-a, and the trial court erred in directing judgment in its favor. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur. [See 280 App. Div. 806.J