Case ID: f-appx_203/html/0291-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rafael FERNANDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SILVERSTONE INVESTMENTS, INC., Juan C. Martinez, Jean Marc-Rogliano, Elena Fraga, Defendants-Appellees.
    Nos. 06-11352, 06-13188
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Oct. 31, 2006.
    Jamie H. Zidell, J.H. Zidell, P.A., Miami Beach, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Robert M. Einhorn, Zarco & Pardo, P.A., Owei Z. Belleh, Bailey & Dawes, L.C., Miami, FL, for Defendants-Appel-lees.
    Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The district court denied appellant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law notwithstanding the jury’s verdict and alternative motion for a new trial on the issue of damages. The court denied the motion for judgment as a matter of law because the evidence did not point so overwhelmingly in favor of the plaintiff that a reasonable jury could not return a verdict for the defendants. After reviewing the relevant portions of the trial transcript, we agree with the district court and thus affirm its ruling.

AFFIRMED.