Case ID: f-appx_399/html/0787-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carolyn De GUZMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NIH FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 10-1825.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.
    Decided: Oct. 25, 2010.
    Carolyn de Guzman, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey William Larroca, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, L.L.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
    Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn de Guzman appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on her employment discrimination and retaliation claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Guzman v. NIH Fed. Credit Union, No. 8:08-cv-03213-PJM, 2010 WL 2802127 (D.Md. July 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.