Case ID: ga-app_24/html/0547-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

10952.
    Garrett v. The State.
    Decided December 9, 1919.
    Indictment for manufacture of liquor; from Terrell superior court—Judge Worrill. September 22, 1919.
    
      Yeomans & Wilkinson, for plaintiff in error.
    
      B. T. Gastellow, solicitor-general, R. R. Arnold, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

1. The court did not err in admitting the testimony complained of in the 1st special ground of the motion for a new trial. Under the facts of the case it was legal and relevant.

2. The excerpt from the charge of the court, excepted to, is not erroneous for any reason assigned.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.