Case ID: sw3d_226/html/0898-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jemal DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 88642.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    June 26, 2007.
    Jessica M. Hathaway, Saint Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Joshua N. Corman, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J. and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jemal Davis appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting for the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).