Case ID: sw3d_34/html/0852-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Debra CARTER, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Derrick CARTER, Respondent/Appellant.
    No. ED 76758.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Dec. 26, 2000..
    Sandford J. Miller, Michael P. Steeno, Law Office of Miller & Steeno, Clayton, for Appellant.
    Michelle S. House-Connaghan, Barbara L. Greenberg, Law Offices of Green, Cor-donnier & House LLP, St. Louis, for Respondent.
    Before MOONEY, P.J., SIMON, J., and SULLIVAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Derrick Carter (Appellant) appeals the trial court’s judgment granting Debra Carter’s (Respondent) Motion to Modify in part, and denying Appellant’s Cross Motion to Modify. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).