Case ID: sw3d_480/html/0387-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joey ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 101447
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    Filed: April 28, 2015
    Amy M. Bartholow, 1000 W. Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Andrew C. Hooper, Asst. Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, for respondent.
    
      Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and-Gary M, Gaertner, Jr., JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joey Roberts. appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We find the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).