Case ID: mich_499/html/0984-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Larsen, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Application of Consumers Energy Company for 2012 Reconciliation,
    No. 152762; Court of Appeals No. 321877.
   On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 22, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is denied, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. See In re Application of Consumers Energy Company for Reconciliation of 2009 Costs, 499 Mich 885 (2016).

Larsen, J.

I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting statement in In re Consumers Energy, 499 Mich 885 (2016).

Viviano, J., joined the statement of Larsen, J.