Case ID: ga-app_38/html/0181-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

18795.
    Phillips v. The State.
    Decided May 15, 1928.
   Broyles, C. J.

1. The evidence amply authorized the jury to find that the plaintiff in error and his codefendants entered into a conspiracy to commit the robbery charged. Under tuis ruling the admission of the evidence and the charge of the court complained of in the motion for a new trial were not error for any reason assigned.

2. The alleged newly discovered evidence is cumulative and impeaching, and is not of such a character as would probably produce a different verdict upon another trial.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

H. E. Elders, O. L. Gowari, for plaintiff in error.

J. T. Grice, solicitor-general, contra.