Case ID: so2d_181/html/0575-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Emil MORTON d/b/a Morton Towers, and Markowitz Bros., Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. The MASTAN CO., Inc., a Delaware corporation, Appellee.
    No. 65-425.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    Jan. 4, 1966.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 26, 1966.
    Irving Cypen Law Offices, Miami Beach, and Norman M. Sevin, Miami, for appellants.
    Shapiro, Fried & Weil, Miami Beach, for appellee.
    Before TILLMAN PEARSON, CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of the rule stated in Hardcastle v. Mobley, Fla.App.1962, 143 So.2d 715, and approved in Harvey Building, Inc. v. Haley, Fla.1965, 175 So. 2d 780; i. e., after the movant has offered sufficient admissible evidence to support his claim of the nonexistence of a genuine issue as to any material fact, the party moved against by summary judgment must come forward with facts contradicting those submitted by the movant and demonstrating a real issue between the parties.

Affirmed.