Case ID: f-appx_23/html/0175-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George Thomas O’BRIEN, a/k/a Bluto, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 01-4334.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 17, 2001.
    Decided Jan. 11, 2002.
    Jennifer T. Stanton, J.T. Stanton, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Fernando Groene, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

George T. O’Brien appeals the district court’s order denying modification of his terms of supervised release. O’Brien’s contention that restrictions to his ability to operate a motor vehicle are unnecessary to protect the public and bear no reasonable relationship to his crime effectively attack the district court’s original sentencing decision, and thus provide no basis for modification. See United States v. Lussier, 104 F.3d 32, 34 (2d Cir.1997). Accordingly, the order of the district court is affirmed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.