Case ID: f-appx_265/html/0450-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. J. Isidro Gerardo CORONA-CASTANEDA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-10534.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 14, 2008.
    
    Filed Jan. 22, 2008.
    Steven M. Crass, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Robert W. Rainwater, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Fresno, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: HALL, O’SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

J. Isidro Gerardo Corona-Castaneda appeals from the 77-month sentence imposed upon re-sentencing following remand pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Corona-Castaneda contends that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court gave too much weight to the Sentencing Guidelines thereby creating a de facto mandatory sentence. We disagree. The district court conducted a thorough analysis of the sentencing factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and we conclude that Corona-Castaneda’s sentence is not unreasonable. See Gall v. United States, -U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 586, 597-98, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.