Case ID: mass_306/html/0618-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mamie Karger vs. Eva M. Chase & others.
    June 26, 1940.
    
      H. M. Pakulski, for the defendant George M. Chase.
    
      A. W. Ingalls, for the defendant Eva M. Chase, submitted a brief.
    
      B. N. Vernon, for the plaintiff.
   Decree affirmed with costs. The agreement directly between husband and wife, made on November 30, 1938, was ineffectual. Mr. Buzzell as trustee for the wife remained entitled to the share of the estate of Mulleavey assigned to him by the separation agreement of May 2, 1938. The beneficial interest in that share passed to the wife as her unrestricted property, and from her to the plaintiff. There was nothing in the nature of a spendthrift trust. There was ample consideration for the note held by the plaintiff.