Case ID: f-appx_191/html/0181-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael J. SINDRAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tamara SAUNDERS; John Zacker, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 06-1578.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 20, 2006.
    Decided: July 24, 2006.
    Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Michael Sindram appeals a district court judgment summarily dismissing his complaint for having failed to state a claim and for having failed to comply with the requirements of a pre-filing injunction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons of the district court. See Sindram v. Saunders, No. 8:06-cv-00578-PJM (D.Md. Mar. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.