Case ID: so2d_419/html/0358-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James Daniel BURCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 82-707.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Sept. 10, 1982.
    E. Summers Sheffey, Dade City, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We strike from the conditions of defendant’s probation condition # 12, which states that the defendant “[m]ust not father any children during probation period.” See Rodriguez v. State, 878 So.2d 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). Otherwise, we affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentences.

SCHEB, A. C. J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.