Case ID: nys_24/html/1150-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SWEENEY, Appellant, v. REDMOND, Respondent.
    (Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.
    August 9, 1893.)
    Appeal from first district court.
    Action by John V. Sweeney against Ellen Redmond for compensation for services as a physician and surgeon. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff-op-peals.
    Affirmed.
    Argued before BISCHOFF and GIEGERICH, JJ.
    T. E. Tomlinson, (Daniel T. Kimball, of counsel,) for appellant.
    John Callahan, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The questions presented for solution on this appeal are only those involving facts, in respect whereof there is a conflict of evidence. Careful consideration of the evidence satisfies us that the decision of the justice was-in all respects correct, and therefore the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.