Case ID: cust-ct_12/html/0299-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Cole,-J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 49372.
    Protests 996736-G, etc., of Suen Mark & Co. (San Francisco).
   Opinion by

Cole,-J.

The merchandise was classified under the same paragraphs and claimed dutiable at the same rates as similar merchandise covered by the decision in Quong Yuen Shing v. United States (31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of said cited case the merchandise at bar was found to contain salt and was therefore excluded from paragraph 5. The protests were sustained to this extent.