Case ID: so2d_398/html/0332-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SHORES, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte Thomas Randall WATSON. (In re Thomas Randall Watson v. State of Alabama).
    80-171.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Feb. 20, 1981.
    Sterling G. Culpepper, Jr. of Smith, Bowman, Thagard, Crook & Culpepper, Montgomery, Paul M. Harden of Harden & Mel-son, Monroeville, for petitioners.
    Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., for respondents.
   SHORES, Justice.

The Petitioner has not employed either ARAP 10(f) or 39(k) to present the issue he asserts. Therefore, the merits of his contention are not before us, and we are, therefore, compelled to deny his petition, 398 So.2d 320.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.