Case ID: nys_159/html/1116-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles A. GREVE and Agnes R. Greve, Appellants. v. Fred GRAF, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    June 16, 1916.)
    Appeal from Trial Term, Kings County. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal. Reversed, and new trial granted.
   PER CURIAM.

The court cannot discover any substantial basis for the finding that, beyond the $1,000 invested by defendant, he contributed $740, which should be repaid him. His testimony shows definitely that he drew from the bank about that sum in excess of the $1,000. The parties should, upon a new trial of the simple questions involved, show how the account stood between the partners, what are the assets and what are the debts, inasmuch as a public accountant examined the books. The judgment is reversed, and a new trial granted; costs to abide the final award of costs.