Case ID: nj-eq_99/html/0889-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Louis Peragallo, respondent, v. Philip Oneto et al., appellants.
    [Decided May 17th, 1926.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Griffin, whose opinion is reported in 98 N. J. Eq. 7A
    
      Mr. Anthony P. La Porta, for the respondent.
    
      Messrs. Stuhr & Vogt, for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.