Case ID: ind-app_78/html/0700-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Remy, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hobbs et al. v. King et al.
    [No. 10,600.
    Filed June 28, 1922.]
    From Hamilton Circuit Court; Ernest E. Cloe, Judge.
    Action between William B. Hobbs and others and Cassius M. King and. others. From the judgment rendered, the former appeal.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    
      Thomas E. Kane and Gifford & Gifford, for appellants.
    
      Dan Waugh, S. A. Culver, J. F. Neal and N. C. Neal, for appellees.
   Remy, J.

— Affirmed on authority of Willett v. Larch (1920), 189 Ind. 410, 127 N. E. 546. See, also, Rook v. Straus Bros. Co. (1916), 60 Ind. App. 381, 110 N. E. 1006; Kinniston v. Rarick (1919), 71 Ind. App. 455, 125 N. E. 80; Solimito v. State (1919), 188 Ind. 170, 122 N. E. 578; Campbell v. Nebeker (1877), 58 Ind. 446.