Case ID: ky_9/html/0023-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Judge Owsley", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WILLIAM RENNICK, appellant, vs. WILLIAM WALTHAL, appellee.
    
    
      On an appeal from a judgment of the Warren crt. court.
    
    It is no cause for a new trial that one of the jurors was not a housekeeper, Vide 1 Marsh. 213, acc.
    8 Oct. 1819.
    
      Hardin for appellant, Bibb contra.
   Judge Owsley

delivered the opinion of the court.

The circumstance of Rennick having discovered, after the trial, that one of the jurors was not a house-keeper, we are of opinion, was correctly held by the court below, not to furnish a sufficient cause for a new trial.

The judgment must be affirmed with cost and damages. 
      
       Absent, Judge Rowan.