Case ID: so2d_634/html/1144-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

KAISER INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Appellant, v. STATIA TERMINALS, INC., et al., Appellees.
    No. 93-2458.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 12, 1994.
    Annis, Mitchell, Cockey, Edwards & Roehn and Robert M. Daisley, Wolfgang M. Florin and Mercedes G. Hale, Tampa, for appellant.
    Holland & Knight and R. Thomas Farrar, Miami, for appellees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and LEVY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The summary judgment entered below is reversed because there are genuine issues as to (a) whether the phrase in dispute has the meaning contended for by the appellant and (b) whether, if so, it formed a part of the binding agreement between the parties.