Case ID: njl_115/html/0174-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MARIE C. SCHANTZ, RESPONDENT, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Argued February 7, 1935
    Decided May 17, 1935.
    For the respondent, Charles B. McGinley.
    
    For the appellant, Jacob L. Newman.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for ■ the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Parker, Bodihe, Heher, Perskie, Yah Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.