Case ID: cust-ct_21/html/0240-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Before the Second Division,
    November 17, 1948
    No. 52684.
    protests 792809-G and 922749-G (San Francisco).
    Samuel S. Perry v. United States,
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of so-called “artificial gut or artificial teguso,” in chief value of silk, the same in all material respects as the merchandise the classification of which was involved in Bush v. United States (34 C. C. P. A. 17, C. A. D. 338). Upon the established facts and following the cited authority, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.