Case ID: so2d_537/html/0686-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frank E. SCOTT and Dorothy J. Scott, his wife, Appellants, v. WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. OF FLORIDA, a Florida corporation, and Joseph E. Jack, Robert E. Oliver and Howard Harrenberg, individually, jointly and severally, Appellees.
    No. 88-2469.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Jan. 25, 1989.
    
      Alan E. Brady of Suto, Sider, Doner & Baldovin, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellants.
    Edward D. Schuster of Pyszka, Kessler, Massey, Weldon, Catri, Holton & Douber-ley, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.
   FASTRACK APPEAL

PER CURIAM.

An order simply granting a motion to dismiss a complaint “with prejudice” is not a final appealable order. Russell v. Russell, 507 So.2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). The judicial labor remaining to be accomplished at the trial court level (upon appropriate application) is an order dismissing the complaint with prejudice. Thus, we are without jurisdiction to consider this appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.