Case ID: f-appx_369/html/0444-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Victor B. WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FNU TAYLOR; FNU Moss; FNU Sergeant; FNU Smith; FNU Paulk; FNU Childs; FNU Trimmer, Defendants-Appellees, and FNU Smereka; City of Charlotte, North Carolina, Defendants.
    No. 10-1014.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 22, 2010.
    Decided: March 9, 2010.
    Victor B. White, Appellant Pro Se. David John Adinolfi, II, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Sean Francis Perrin, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Victor B. White seeks to appeal the district court’s text orders dismissing some, but not all defendants, and denying reconsideration in this civil rights action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders White seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.