Case ID: f-appx_127/html/0682-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Elizabeth A. REEVES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ST. MARY’S COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; Board of Appeals for St. Mary’s County, Maryland; Department of Planning and Zoning for St. Mary’s County, Maryland; Health Department; Department of Environmental Health; Susan McNeal; Howard Thompson; Spencer Scriber; Terry Miller; Margaret Abraham; Lawrence E. Rowland; Jon B. Grimm; Daniel H. Raley; Shelby P. Guazzo; J. Thomas Mattingly, Jr.; Joseph Anderson; Julie Randall, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 04-1447.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 29, 2005.
    Decided: May 12, 2005.
    Elizabeth A. Reeves, Appellant pro se.
    Daniel Karp, Allen, Karpinski, Bryant & Karp, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    
      Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Elizabeth A. Reeves appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find that the district court properly dismissed the action as barred by res judicata. See Meekins v. United Transp. Union, 946 F.2d 1054, 1057-58 (4th Cir.1991). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Reeves v. St. Mary’s County Comm’rs, 268 F.Supp.2d 576 (D.Md.2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED