Case ID: ill-app_64/html/0538-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Mr. Presiding Justice Gary", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John F. Neagle v. Henry G. Dawson et al.
    1. Practice—Affirmance—Damages for Delay.—A dismissal of an appeal is an affirmance of the judgment for the purpose of giving damages for delay, as well as a remedy upon the appeal bond.
    Assessment of Damages, upon dismissal of appeal. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Henry V. Freeman, Judge, presiding.
    Heard in this court at the March term, 1896.
    Damages assessed in this court.
    Opinion filed March 31, 1896.
    Frank P. Reynolds, attorney for appellant.
    Weigley & Eastman, attorneys for appellees.
   Mr. Presiding Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Oh the first day of this term the appellant dismissed this appeal.

The appellees now ask damages. Sections 23 and 24, Chapter 33, “Costs,” and Section 74, Chapter 110, “Practice,” entitle the appellees to damages.

The dismissal of the appeal is an affirmance of the judgment of the Superior Court, for the purpose of giving damages for delay, as well as for remedy upon the appeal bond. Garrick v. Chamberlain, 97 Ill. 620.

Damages are awarded—ten per cent on the first $100, and five per cent on the residue—as the appeal appears to have been only for delay.