Case ID: f-appx_678/html/0194-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos Enrique SAMAYOA-PINEDA, Defendant-Appellant
    No. 15-50671 Summary Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Filed February 23, 2017
    Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of' Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Carlos Enrique Samayoa-Pineda, Pro Se
    Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. .
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Enrique Samayoa-Pineda again has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sa-mayoa-Pineda has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Samayoa-Pineda’s response. Regardless of several nonfrivolous issues we previously identified, it is dispositive that the Government has declined to waive the untimeliness of the appeal. See United States v. Pesina-Rodriguez, 825 F.3d 787, 788 (5th Cir. 2016). Therefore, without prejudice to a future 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion that Samayoa-Pineda may file, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.