Case ID: nj-eq_88/html/0600-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eva P. Cropsey, complainant-appellant, v. Charles D. Cropsey, defendant-respondent.
    [Decided March 4th, 1918.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by 'Vice-Chancellor Backes, whose opinion is reported ante'p. J/91.
    
    
      Messrs. Ziegener & Lane, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Robert Carey, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree apj>ealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White. Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 14.

For reversal — None.