Case ID: so2d_771/html/0428-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DIAL KENNELS OF ALABAMA, INC., d/b/a Alabama Kennels; et al. v. MACON COUNTY GREYHOUND PARK, INC., et al.
    2960492.
    Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.
    May 19, 2000.
    
      Jock M. Smith, Tuskegee; Robert D. Segall of Copeland, Franco, Screws & Gill, Montgomery; and Gregory L. Davis, Montgomery, for appellants.
    Fred D. Gray and Stanley F. Gray of Gray, Langford, Sapp, McGowan, Gray & Nathanson, Tuskegee, for appellee Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc.
    Deborah Hill Biggers, Tuskegee, for ap-pellee Macon County Racing Commission.
   PER CURIAM.

This court, on December 19, 1997, affirmed the trial court’s summary judgment, without an opinion. 736 So.2d 685 (Ala.Civ.App.1997) (table). On certiorari review, the Supreme Court of Alabama affirmed our judgment of affirmance insofar as it related to the breach-of-contract claim, but reversed it insofar as it related to the claims of fraudulent suppression and fraudulent misrepresentation. Ex parte Dial Kennels of Alabama, Inc., 771 So.2d 419 (Ala.1999). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the summary judgment is reversed insofar as it relates to the claims of fraudulent suppression and fraudulent misrepresentation, and this cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

All the judges concur.