Case ID: mich_40/html/0063-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

People ex rel. Albert Ives v. The Circuit Judge for Muskegon County.
    
      Injunction to restrain action at law.
    
    Mandamus will not lie to compel a court to proceed with a trial that has been enjoined.
    The sufficiency of an injunction bill cannot be reviewed-in collateral proceedings.
    Motion for order to show cause why mandamus should not issue to require the circuit judge to proceed with the trial of a cause after an injunction to restrain it has been allowed.
    Submitted January 7.
    Denied January 8.
    
      F. A. Baker for the writ.
   Per Curiam.

Mandamus will not lie to compel a circuit court to proceed to trial when a bill has been filed and injunction allowed to restrain it. The sufficiency of the bill cannot be reviewed collaterally, whether the bill is in the same or another court.