Case ID: so2d_404/html/0427-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Larry SAPP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 80-2283, 81-78.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Oct. 14, 1981.
    Larry Sapp, pro se.
    Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and Samuel R. Mandelbaum, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Deborah A. Osmond, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. However, condition (7) is stricken from the order of revocation of probation as there was no determination of appellant’s financial condition such that payment could be made. See Coxon v. State, 365 So.2d 1067 (Fla.2d DCA 1979).

SCHEB, C. J., and HOBSON and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.