Case ID: so2d_670/html/1027-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard N. FRIEDMAN, Appellant, v. Walter L. REVELL, Appellee.
    No. 95-921.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Feb. 28, 1996.
    Rehearing Denied April 17, 1996.
    Richard N. Friedman, in proper person.
    Ponzoli, Wassenberg & Sperkacz and Richard L. Wassenberg, Miami, for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Rosenblatt v. Baer, 383 U.S. 75, 86 S.Ct. 669, 15 L.Ed.2d 597 (1966); New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 271-280, 84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964); Demby v. English, 667 So.2d 350 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Pullum v. Johnson, 647 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), rev. denied, 654 So.2d 919 (1995); Saro Corp. v. Waterman Broadcasting Corp., 595 So.2d 87 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Cronley v. Pensacola News-Journal, Inc., 561 So.2d 402 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Della-Donna v. Gore Newspapers Co., 489 So.2d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), rev. denied, 494 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1986), cert. denied 479 U.S. 1088, 107 S.Ct. 1294, 94 L.Ed.2d 150 (1987).