Case ID: cust-ct_4/html/0490-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 43764.
    Protest 751122-G of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) uninflated rubber balls like those the subject of United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) at 30 percent under paragraph 1502; (2) squawker balloons at 45 percent under paragraph 409, Abstract 40493 followed; (3) india rubber articles similar to those the subject of Abstract 41517 at 25 percent under paragraph 1537; and (4) opera glasses at 35 percent under paragraph 228 (b) and the French Trade Agreement, Woolworth v. United States (2 Cust. Ct. 1, C. D. 74) followed.