Case ID: f-appx_353/html/0859-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Tommy CARVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Boyd BENNETT; Utilization Review Board; Doctor Campbell; Robert Uhren, M.D.; David R. Mitchell, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 09-7637.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 17, 2009.
    Decided: Nov. 25, 2009.
    Tommy Carver, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tommy Carver appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carver v. Bennett, No. 1:09-cv-00283-GCM (W-D.N.C. Aug. 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.