Case ID: sw3d_457/html/0394-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cordell BASS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 101720
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    
    Filed: March 10, 2015
    Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Mov-ant/Appellant.
    Dora A. Fichter, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent/Respondent.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cordell Bass appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Burston v. State, 343 S.W.3d 691, 693 (Mo.App.E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b). 
      
      . All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2011, unless otherwise indicated.