Case ID: del-cas_3/html/0224-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ELEUTHERE IRENEE DU PONT, JACQUES BIDERMAN AND BUREAU DE PUSY v. PETER BAUDUY.
    Court of Chancery. New Castle.
    Account begins,
    
      Ridgely’s Notebook III, 466.
    
    Hearing on the cross-bill exceptions above. Counsel for Bauduy (defendant to this cross-bill) argues that the Court of Chancery has no jurisdiction in this cause since there is an adequate remedy at law. Counsel for Du Pont, (complainant in cross-bill) maintains that defendant cannot ignore the cross-bill, but can be required to plead, answer, or demur.
    (At this point, the report ends abruptly.)