Case ID: ohio-st-3d_71/html/0614-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Senne.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Senne (1995), 71 Ohio St.3d 614.]
    (No. 94-2307
    Submitted January 10, 1995
    Decided March 22, 1995.)
    
      
      Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
    
      Richard McCune, for- respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record in this case, we agree with the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(5) and (6), 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(2) and. Gov.Bar R. VI(1) and (3). We also concur in the recommended sanction. Accordingly, we order that respondent be suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.