Case ID: sw3d_97/html/0079-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robin Leigh REYNOLDS, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Mark Paul REYNOLDS, Respondent/Appellant.
    No. ED 80910.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Nov. 26, 2002.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 27, 2003.
    Application for Transfer Denied March 4, 2003.
    Mark Paul Reynolds, Steedman, pro se.
    Michael J. Kuster, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J. and MARY K. HOFF, J. and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Paul Reynolds (Father) appeals from the trial court’s Judgment and Decree of Modification (Judgment) modifying the parties’ dissolution decree so that Robin Leigh Reynolds has sole custody of the parties’ minor child subject to Father’s reasonable visitation rights.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).