Case ID: sw2d_785/html/0158-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kyle Wayne GARNER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
    No. 004-90.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.
    March 7, 1990.
    Lloyd D. Odie, Lewisville, for appellant.
    Jerry Cobb, Dist. Atty., and Gwinda Burns, Asst. Dist. Atty., Denton, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.
   OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of driving while intoxicated. The trial court assessed punishment at ten days in jail and a fine of $300. Appellant’s conviction was reversed. Garner v. State, 779 S.W.2d 498 (Tex.App. — Ft. Worth, 1989).

The State raises two grounds for review. We agree with the Court of Appeals that reversal is required. However, as is true in every case where discretionary review is refused, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning or language employed by the Court of Appeals. Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

With this understanding, we refuse the State’s petition for discretionary review.

WHITE, J., not participating.