Case ID: sw2d_873/html/0342-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Roberta COVINGTON n/k/a Thomas, Appellant, v. Wilfred COVINGTON, Respondent.
    No. 64010.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    April 12, 1994.
    Nathan S. Cohen, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Bruce Eastman, Florissant, for respondent.
    Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals the trial court’s order granting Father’s motion to recover overpaid child support and denying her motion for-reimbursement of necessaries. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 84.16(b)(1). Further, no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

An opinion would have no precedential value. Therefore, we affirm by written order. A memorandum for the parties’ use only has been prepared. Rule 84.16(b).