Case ID: f-appx_533/html/0190-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard L. FULTON, a/k/a Kevin, a/k/a Brandon B. Washington, a/k/a Kev, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 12-8121.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 20, 2013.
    Decided: July 17, 2013.
    Richard L. Fulton, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Mitchell Huber, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard L. Fulton appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines. Because Fulton’s original criminal judgment specifically found him responsible for over twenty-five kilograms of crack cocaine, the district court correctly ruled that he is ineligible for a reduction in sentence. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1(c)(1) (2012). In addition, we find that Fulton’s allegations of procedural error constitute, at most, harmless error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.