Case ID: f-appx_41/html/0990-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CONSTANCE CENTER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. PEOPLE SOLUTIONS, INC.; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 01-15858.
    D.C. No. CV-00-00682-LKK(DAD).
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 22, 2002 
      .
    
    Decided July 29, 2002.
    Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument and denies Center’s request for oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Constance Center appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in her employment discrimination action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We review summary judgment de novo. Margolis v. Ryan, 140 F.3d 850, 852 (9th Cir.1998). Because the documents Center filed on June 16, 1999 did not constitute a complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a), the district court properly determined that her action was time-barred. See Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 149, 104 S.Ct. 1723, 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (per curiam).

Center’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.