Case ID: sw3d_193/html/0575-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ST. LUKE’S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL, Petitioner v. Irving W. MARKS, Respondent.
    No. 05-0693.
    Supreme Court of Texas.
    May 5, 2006.
    L. Boyd Smith Jr., Jennifer H. Davidow, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., Houston, for Petitioner.
    James E. Doyle, Michael David Schi-mek, N. Kimberly Bohannon, Michael P. Doyle, Doyle, Restrepo, Harvin & Robbins, L.L.P., Houston, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The petition for review is granted. Without reference to the merits, the court of appeals’ judgment, 177 S.W.3d 255, is vacated and the case is remanded to the court of appeals for further consideration in light of our decision in Diversicare General Partner, Inc. v. Rubio, 185 S.W.3d 842 (Tex.2005). See TEX. R. APP. P. 59.1, 60.2(f).