Case ID: sw2d_792/html/0013-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Keven WATSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 56970.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    April 24, 1990.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 30, 1990.
    Application to Transfer Denied July 31, 1990.
    Janis C. Good, David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Frank A. Jung, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Keven Watson, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an eviden-tiary hearing. We affirm.

The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion'would serve no precedential purpose. 'A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, have been provided explaining the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).