Case ID: f-appx_658/html/0330-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ignacio DIAZ-PEREZ, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 10-70644
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted May 15, 2013  San Francisco, California
    Filed October 03, 2016
    Christopher John Stender, Federal Immigration Counselors, Phoenix, AZ.
    
      Chief Counsel ICE, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Edward Earl Wiggers, Washington, DC.
    Before: CLIFTON and BEA, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN, Senior District Judge.
    
      
      
         The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
    
      
       The Honorable Edward R. Korman, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.
    
   ORDER

Respondent’s unopposed motion to vacate this Court’s June 3, 2013 disposition and remand the petition to the Board of Immigration Appeals (the “Board”) is granted. Petitioner’s motion to vacate and remand is likewise granted. Petitioner’s removal is stayed pending the Board’ decision on remand.

Petitioner may file a motion to reinstate this petition within 30 days of the Board’ decision. The parties have agreed to bear their own costs and fees.

Petitioner’s motion for panel rehearing is denied as moot.

This order shall act as and for the mandate of the court. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.