Case ID: so2d_246/html/0583-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Minta B. SLATON, Appellant, v. George R. SLATON, Appellee.
    No. 70-1015.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    March 5, 1971.
    Rehearing Denied April 27, 1971.
    R. T. Shankweiler, of Patterson, Maloney & Frazier, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    Thomas B. Mimms, Jr., of Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The issue presented on this interlocutory appeal is whether or not the trial judge committed error in denying a motion to compel answers to certain questions put to the appellee in the course of his deposition. The record, the briefs, and the oral argument leave us with the view that no abuse of discretion has been demonstrated. The order appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

WALDEN, REED and MAGER, JJ., concur.