Case ID: f-appx_10/html/0160-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Keith W. WORMACK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 00-2418.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted April 30, 2001.
    Decided May 23, 2001.
    Stephen F. Shea, Willoner, Calabrese & Rosen, P.A., College Park, MD, for appellant. Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Ariana Wright Arnold, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte J. Hardnett, Acting General Counsel, Frank V. Smith, III, Acting Deputy General Counsel, John S. Sacchetti, Associate General Counsel, Ejike H. Obineche, Office of General Counsel, Social Security Administration, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Keith W. Wormack appeals the magistrate judge’s order entering summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner in Wormack’s action for review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his claim for disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Wormack v. Apfel, No. CA-00-315-L (D.Md. Sept. 5, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).