Case ID: f-appx_320/html/0742-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Alberto AMARO-MORALES, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-10274.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 18, 2009.
    
    Filed March 31, 2009.
    James R. Knapp, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.
    
      Daniel L. Kaplan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Luis Alberto Amaro-Morales appeals from the 27-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss.

Amaro-Morales challenges his sentence on multiple grounds. We conclude that the appeal waiver contained in his plea agreement is valid and enforceable and precludes our review of his contentions. See United States v. Nunez, 223 F.3d 956, 958 (9th Cir.2000); see also Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998); United States v. Lopez-Armenta, 400 F.3d 1173, 1176-77 (9th Cir.2005).

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.