Case ID: f-appx_110/html/0817-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mikic SLAVISA, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 03-70974.
    Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 25, 2004.
    
    Decided Oct. 5, 2004.
    Jerry Levine, Levine Law Offices, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner.
    Regional Counsel, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Legal Officer, San Francisco, CA, Richard M. Evans, Timothy P. Mcllmail, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Mikic Slavisa, Serbian native in Kosovo and citizen of the former Yugoslavia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and for relief under the Convention Against Torture. The record establishes that the petitioner did suffer past persecution as a Serbian living in Kosovo. He fled ethnic cleansing by Albanian Kosavars, and his house and store were burned and looted. Such flight from ethnic cleansing constitutes past persecution. See Knezevic v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 1206 (9th Cir.2004). He is therefore entitled to a presumption of a well-founded fear of future persecution if returned to Kosovo. The BIA’s conclusion that he had failed to demonstrate a well-founded fear of future persecution in Kosovo is therefore not supported by substantial evidence in the record.

The BIA did not consider the issue of whether the petitioner could relocate internally within the former Yugoslavia, and we therefore remand for consideration of this issue. See Knezevic.

The petition for review is GRANTED and the matter REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.