Case ID: sw3d_155/html/0788-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Andre REYNOLDS, Appellant.
    No. ED 83984.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Jan. 18, 2005.
    Kristina Starke, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Deborah Daniels, Leslie McNamara (co-counsel), Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, C.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Andre Reynolds appeals the judgment entered on his conviction for drug trafficking. He claims that the trial court erred by admitting hearsay and by repeatedly instructing the jury to continue deliberating and failing to give a “hammer instruction” or declare a mistrial sua sponte.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have, however, been provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).