Case ID: ad_275/html/0698-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Walter Case et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Former Employees of R. B. Rogers Companies, Inc., Similarly Situated, Respondents, v. Indian Motocycle Company, Appellant, et al., Defendants. Walter Case et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Former Employees of R. B. Rogers Companies, Inc., Similarly Situated, Respondents, v. John B. Chertok, Appellant, et al., Defendants. Walter Case et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Former Employees of R. B. Rogers Companies, Inc., Similarly Situated, Respondents, v. Indian Motocycle Company et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
   No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents and votes to reverse the orders appealed from and grant the motion to strike from the complaint all reference to the representative character of the action and to require the plaintiffs to servé an amended complaint separately stating and numbering each individual cause of action upon the ground that the plaintiffs do not show sufficient unity of interest to warrant the maintenance of a representative action. [See post, p. 768.]