Case ID: f-appx_231/html/0709-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Francisco MARQUEZ, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 06-50544.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted May 7, 2007 .
    Filed May 14, 2007.
    Christina M. McCall, USSD—Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Timothy R. Garrison, FDSD—Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    
      Before: KOZINSKI, GOULD and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

The government’s unopposed motion for summary reversal and remand is granted. The district court failed to provide notice of its intent to sentence appellant outside the range suggested by the Sentencing Guidelines as required by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(h). See United States v. Evans-Martinez, 448 F.3d 1163 (9th Cir.2006). In light of this court’s holding in United States v. Evans-Martinez, we vacate the sentence and remand for proceedings consistent with its holding.

Appellant’s request for remand to a different district judge is denied. Appellant has not made “a showing that the judge ‘would not be able to put out of his mind his previously expressed views or that he would ignore the mandate of this court on remand.’ ” United States v. Peyton, 353 F.3d 1080, 1091 (9th Cir.2003), quoting United States v. Rapal, 146 F.3d 661, 666 (9th Cir.1998).

VACATED AND REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.