Case ID: fla_147/html/0528-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jessie Bell v. First National Bank of Bradenton and G. B. Knowles.
    3 So. (2nd) 127
    Division A
    Opinion Filed June 17, 1941
    
      Singeltary & Cornwell, for Appellant.
    
      G. B. Knowles, for Appellees. •
   Per Curiam.

The appeal brings for review final decree in favor of the defendant on the pleadings and testimony taken and report of special master.

A careful perusal of the record discloses that the controlling question is whether or not the evidence sustains the decree.

Our conclusion is that the decree is supported by a preponderance of the evidence and, on consideration of the entire record, no reversible error being made to appear, the decree is affirmed.

So ordered.

Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Buford and Adams, J. J., concur.