Case ID: f-appx_57/html/0177-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph BOWLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.K. YOUNG, Warden; A.P. Harvey, Operations, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 02-6970.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted March 3, 2003.
    Decided March 12, 2003.
    Joseph Bowler, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Joseph Bowler appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bowler v. Young, No. CA-01-800 (W.D.Va. June 12, 2002). We also deny Bowler’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.