Case ID: f-appx_220/html/0200-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ray Wallace METTETAL, Jr., a/k/a Steven Ray Maupin, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 06-6963.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 14, 2007.
    Decided: March 1, 2007.
    Ray Wallace Mettetal, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Ray Wallace Mettetal, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Crim P. 41(g) motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Mettetal’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mettetal, No. 3:96-cr-50034-nkm (W.D.Va. May 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.