Case ID: f-appx_362/html/0615-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique AVALOS-BARRIGA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-56693.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 15, 2009.
    
    Filed Jan. 11, 2010.
    Todd Robinson, Federal Office Building, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Enrique Avalos-Barriga, Adelanto, CA, pro se.
    Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Federal prisoner Enrique Avalos-Barri-ga appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Because Avalos-Barriga’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel during trial has been explicitly addressed in a previous proceeding, we will not reconsider that issue. See United States v. Avalos-Barriga, 21 Fed.Appx. 626 (9th Cir.2001).

We deny Avalos-Barriga’s request to expand the certificate of appealability. See 9th Cir. R. 22 — 1(e); see also Hiivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.