Case ID: f-appx_7/html/0731-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Myesheia SIMPSON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 00-10066. D.C. No. CR-99-00148-03-SOM.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 13, 2001.
    
    Decided April 3, 2001.
    Before HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Myesheia Simpson appeals from her conviction and sentence, pursuant to a guilty plea, for conspiracy and possession of controlled substances with intent to distribute. Simpson’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw on the ground that the appeal does not have merit. Simpson has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. Having conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we conclude that there are no arguable appellate issues.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.