Case ID: ala-app_25/html/0674-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SAMFORD, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

147 So. 926
    Ben T. ROMINE v. STATE.
    8 Div. 630.
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    April 4, 1933.
    Henry D. Jones, of Florence, for appellant.
    Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.
   SAMFORD, Judge.

According to the undisputed evidence in this case, the defendant is guilty of an assault and battery. This would be the case if every objection of the defendant to the admission of testimony had been sustained. It follows that, even if there were some technical errors in the rulings of the court, such rulings could not have been of injury to defendant in view of the fact that the fine assessed was nominal.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.-