Case ID: cal_162/html/0762-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      THE COURT.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[L. A. No. 3009.
    Department Two.
    March 2, 1912.]
    MAIME L. EICHLER, as Administratrix with the Will Annexed of the Estate of Emily J. Tedford, Deceased, Respondent, v. SARAH J. TEDFORD, as Executrix of the Estate of Asa C. Tedford, Deceased, Appellant.
    Order affirmed on authority of Tedford, v. Michler, ante, p. 214, [121 Pac. 730].
    APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County refusing a new trial. Walter Bordwell, Judge.
    The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Ted-ford v. Bidder, ante, p. 214, [121 Pac. 730].
    Will D. Gould, and G. L. Whitham, for Appellant.
    D. C. Surrey, and Harris & Swanwick, for Respondent.
   THE COURT.

The above entitled cause presents the same propositions considered in Tedford v. Eichler, (L. A. No. 2772), ante, p. 214, [121 Pac. 730], and was submitted with the last mentioned case for decision. For the reasons there given the order appealed from is affirmed.

Hearing, in Bank denied.