Case ID: so2d_462/html/0100-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Javier VALDERRAMA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 84-948.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Jan. 15, 1985.
    Jeffery P. Raffle, Miami, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Jack B. Ludin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUB-BART and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The final judgments of conviction and sentences under review are affirmed upon a holding that the evidence error complained of was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt adduced at trial against the defendant Javier Yalderrama, including the defendant’s own trial testimony. Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223, 93 S.Ct. 1565, 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973); Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969).