Case ID: so2d_561/html/0030-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joel P. GORDON, Appellant, v. FORTUNE SAVINGS BANK, Appellee.
    No. 89-2775.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 16, 1990.
    Martin H. Colin of Altman & Colin, Lake Worth, for appellant.
    Paul F. Probst of Larson, Conklin, Stanley & Probst, P.A., Clearwater, for appel-lee.
   PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary final judgment entered in favor of Plaintiff, Fortune Savings Bank, and against Defendant, Joel P. Gordon, because there exists a genuine issue of material fact which precludes entry of summary judgment as a matter of law. That issue is whether or not Fortune Savings Bank was a holder in due course as concerns the promissory note in question that was assigned to it. Seinfeld v. Commercial Bank & Trust, 405 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent herewith.

WALDEN, GUNTHER and GARRETT, JJ., concur.