Case ID: sw3d_407/html/0693-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Hank X. CRUTCHFIELD, Appellant.
    No. WD 75998.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Aug. 6, 2013.
    Rehearing Denied Oct. 1, 2013.
    Kate E. Noland, Liberty, MO, for respondent.
    Michael W. Walker, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
    
      Before Division Three: LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Presiding Judge, MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Hank Crutchfield appeals the trial court’s judgment finding him guilty of driving while intoxicated after a bench trial. Crutchfield claims that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his pretrial motion to suppress which alleged that driver’s license checkpoints are a per se violation of the Fourth Amendment; and (2) admitting evidence of a “Driver License Checkpoint Written Plan” because the Plan did not satisfy requirements for ensuring that a checkpoint is not an unconstitutional random stop. Because there was reasonable suspicion for the stop of Crutchfield, irrespective of the driver’s license checkpoint, we are not required to reach the issues raised by Crutchfield on appeal. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).