Case ID: f-appx_361/html/0882-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector SANCHEZ-CAMACHO, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-50108.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 15, 2009.
    
    Filed Jan. 11, 2010.
    Dominic Kardum, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.
    Kurt David Hermansen, Law Office of Kurt David Hermansen, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Hector Sanchez-Camacho appeals from the 48-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Sanchez-Camacho contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable because the district court overstated the seriousness of his criminal history, and because the 16-level enhancement that was imposed pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(a) was triggered by a relatively minor and stale narcotics conviction. The record reflects that the district court properly considered Sanchez-Camacho’s individual circumstances and the required factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and that, under the totality of the circumstances, the sentence below the guidelines range is not substantively unreasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51-52, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); United States v. Autery, 555 F.3d 864, 877 (9th Cir.2009).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.