Case ID: f-appx_234/html/0669-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sixto Humberto SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-50298.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 5, 2007.
    
    Filed June 15, 2007.
    Michelle P. Jennings, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    William R. Burgener, Esq., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: LEAYY, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Sixto Humberto Sanchez appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking supervised release.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Sanchez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Sanchez has not filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the Government has not filed an answering brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.