Case ID: f-appx_22/html/0150-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William Leith PASCHALL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 01-7169.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 8, 2001.
    Decided Nov. 16, 2001.
    
      William Leith Paschall, pro se. Michael Thomas Judge, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appel-lee.
    Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

William Leith Paschall appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeala-bility and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Paschall v. Angelone, No. CA-01-219 (E.D.Va. July 5, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.