Case ID: sw3d_547/html/0607-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John SARVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 105550
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: May 22, 2018
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Edward S. Thompson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
    ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.
    Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Sherri B. Sullivan and Kurt S. Odenwald, JJ.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

John Sarver appeals from the judgment entered on his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find no clear error in the motion court's denial of an evidentiary hearing on his post-conviction claims. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).