Case ID: njl_112/html/0504-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JAY H. MANS, APPELLANT, v. MORRIS BRODY, CONSTABLE, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Submitted February 16, 1934
    Decided April 12, 1934.
    For the appellant, Ezra Xarhus.
    
    For the respondents, George J. Miller.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justiee Perskie in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Teenciiard, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.