Case ID: ohio-st-3d_39/html/0117-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Curren.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Curren (1988), 39 Ohio St. 3d 117.]
    (No. D.D. 87-28
    — Submitted March 15, 1988 —
    Decided October 12, 1988.)
    
      
      J. Warren Bettis, disciplinary counsel, and Mark H. Aultman, for relator.
    
      Charles W. Kettlewell, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent violated the Disciplinary Rules indicated by the board. Our review of the record, however, requires us to order a more severe sanction than that recommended by the board. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.