Case ID: ad_112/html/0894-11.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Application of Louis Lischinsky, Appellant, v. Samuel Hellinger, an Attorney at Law, Respondent.
    Appeal from an order denying a motion to compel an attorney to pay over certain moneys.
   Per Curiam:

To- obviate any question as to the order herein being pleaded as a bar, it should he modified by adding a provision thereto that it is without prejudice to such further action by petitioner as he may be advised, And as so modified it should be affirmed, without costs. Present — O’Brien, P. J., Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke and Houghton, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion, and'as modified affirmed, without costs. Order filed.