Case ID: so3d_275/html/0263-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael Allen CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D18-2472
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    July 10, 2019
    Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the revocation of Appellant's probation and the resulting judgment and sentence. We note, however, that the written revocation order does not conform to the trial court's oral pronouncement in that it indicates Appellant violated conditions three and five of his probation, when the court found only a violation of condition three. On remand, the court should enter a corrected order accurately specifying the basis for the revocation.

See Wilkerson v. State , 82 So. 3d 1201 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with directions.

Ray, C.J., and Wetherell and Winokur, JJ., concur.