Case ID: or-app_89/html/0258-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM \n      NEWMAN, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted December 16, 1987,
    affirmed January 13,
    reconsideration denied March 25,
    petition for review allowed April 19, 1988 (305 Or 576)
    HOFFMANN, Plaintiff, and ROTH, Appellant, v. STOLL et al, Respondents.
    
    (8611-07067; CA A44238)
    748 P2d 180
    Stuart K. Cohen, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Timothy E. Brophy and Bernard, Kneeland, Crawford & Brophy, Portland.
    Thomas M. Christ, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Delbert Stoll. With him on the brief was Mitchell, Lang & Smith, Portland.
    Thomas W. Brown, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Richard W. Hagadorn. With him on the brief was Cosgrave, Kester, Crowe, Gidley & Lagesen, Portland.
    Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
   PER CURIAM

Affirmed. Saechao v. Matsakoun, 78 Or App 340, 717 P2d 165, rev dismissed 302 Or 155 (1986).

Newman, J., dissenting.

NEWMAN, J.,

dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons stated by Warren, J., in his dissent in Saechao v. Matsakoun, 78 Or App 340, 348, 717 P2d 165, rev dismissed 302 Or 155 (1986).