Case ID: nys_115/html/1135-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

O’CONNOR, Respondent, v. FORTY-SECOND ST., M., ETC., RY. CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    March 19, 1909.)
    Action by Philip O’Connor against the Forty-Second Street, Manhattanville, etc., Railway Company. B. H. Ames, for appellant. L. J. Vorhaus, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed.

INGRAHAM and LAUGHLIN, JJ., dissent.