Case ID: sw2d_936/html/0869-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Omarr MILLETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 70255.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Jan. 7, 1997.
    Richard H. Sindel, Sindel & Sindel, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Lisa A. Fischer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Omarr Millett, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the decision of the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).