Case ID: ga-app_37/html/0379-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

18419.
    Eason v. The State.
    Assault and Battery, 5 C. J. p. 788, n. 2.
    Criminal Law, 16 C. J. p. 1122, n. 65, 70.
    Decided November 16, 1927.
    Assault and battery; from city court of Blackshear—Judge Bowen. July 16, 1927.
    
      A. J. Tuten, Homer L. Causey, for plaintiff in error.
    
      8. Thomas Memory, solicitor, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

There is nothing in the motion for a new trial that requires a retrial of the case. Granting that there were irregularities in the proceedings, they were not of such a character as to demand a reversal of the judgment, especially as the evidence demanded the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.