Case ID: ga_102/html/0553-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Fish, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hale v. Hammond.
    Submitted April 14,
    Decided May 6, 1897.
    Complaint on notes. Before Judge Henry. Walker superior court. February term, 1896.
    
      Copeland & Jackson and R. M. W. Glenn, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Lumpkin & Shattuck, contra.
   Fish, J.

This case involves no new legal question; the charges complained of were correct presentations of the law applicable to the issues involved; there was no error at the trial; the evidence, though in many respects conflicting, fully warranted the verdict rendered, and there was no abuse of discretion in denying a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.