Case ID: sw2d_945/html/0699-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Victor LABANTSCHNIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KENWORTH OF ST. LOUIS, INC., and J.W. Ackerman, Defendants-Respondents.
    No. 71030.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    May 27, 1997.
    Marvin Klamen, Clayton, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Bernard A. Reinert, Thomas J. Burnside, St. Louis, for Defendants-Respondents.
    Before CRAHAN, P.J., and GRIMM and HOFF, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Victor Labantschnig appeals from a judgment dismissing his libel and invasion of privacy claims against Kenworth of St. Louis, Inc. and J.W. Ackerman (both referred to as respondents) upon the granting of respondents’ motion to dismiss. That judgment resolved all of Labantschnig’s claims against respondents.

No error of law appears in the judgment. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential or jurisprudential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). 
      
      . After the trial court entered judgment on La-bantschnig’s claims against respondents, the only remaining defendant, Earle J. Niederluecke, filed a motion for clarification and to dismiss. In December 1996, the trial judge granted that motion and clarified the earlier dismissal applied to all parties "such that the entire case is final for appeal purposes.”