Case ID: nys_101/html/1120-13.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FARRELL, Appellant, v. BAKER, Respondent. SAME, Appellant, v. HACKETT, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    October 30, 1906.)
    Actions by Edward A. Farrell against Robert Baker and Charles A. Hackett.
   PER CURIAM.

The determination of these appeals must abide the event of the appeal being heard today by the Court of Appeals. If the decision in the First Department is affirmed, these orders must be reversed. If that decision is reversed, these orders must be affirmed. If the Court of Appeals declines to determine the controversy on the merits, leaving the decision in the First Department undisturbed, this court will, as matter of uniformity, follow the decision of this court in its First Department. No costs. Settle order before the presiding justice. See 100 N. Y. Supp. 754.