Case ID: f-appx_689/html/0965-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LINKGINE, INC., Appellant v. VIGLINK, INC., Skimlinks, Inc., Skimbit, Ltd., Appellees
    2016-2087, 2016-2088
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    May 11, 2017
    Kimberly L. Boldt, Boldt Law Firm, PA, Boca Raton, FL, argued for appellant. Also represented by Jeffrey David Mueller, Mario R. Giommoni; William C. Hear-on, William C. Hearon, PA, Miami, FL.
    Richard Martinelli, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellees. Also represented by Donald E. Daybell, Irvine, CA. Appellees Skim-links, Inc., Skimbit, Ltd. also represented by Catrina Wanning Wang, New York, NY.
    Nathan K. Kelley, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by Scott Weidenfeller, Benjamin T. Hickman, Ka-koli Caprihan.
    (Prost, Chief Judge, Lourie and Stoll, Circuit Judges).
   JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.