Case ID: njl_103/html/0204-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. MICHAEL CHIACCIO, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted May 28, 1926
    Decided October 18, 1926.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N. J. Mis. R. 63.
    Por the plaintiff in error, Romulus P. Rimo.
    
    Por the defendant in error, Francis L. Bergen.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Kalish, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.