Case ID: sw3d_364/html/0269-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Donald Ray CHURCH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 97017.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    April 17, 2012.
    Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, For Movant/Appellant.
    Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, For Respondent.
    Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald Ray Church appeals from the motion court’s denial, following an eviden-tiary hearing, of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 84.16(b). 
      
      . All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2011, unless otherwise indicated.