Case ID: sw3d_543/html/0057-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Elaine DEROUIN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. DISCOVER BANK, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. ED 105664
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: December 12, 2017 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 30, 2018 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 3, 2018
    Nicholas G. Higgins, Eureka, MO, for Plaintiff/Appellant.
    Christopher M. Hohn, Matthew D. Guletz, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant/Respondent.
    Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Elaine DeRouin (DeRouin) appeals from the trial court's judgment granting Discover Bank's (Discover) Motion to Dismiss Count II of DeRouin's Amended Petition asserting a claim pursuant to the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, Sections 407.010 to 407.130. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not err in granting Discover's motion and dismissing Count II of DeRouin's Amended Petition. Fenlon v. Union Elec. Co., 266 S.W.3d 852, 854 (Mo. App. E.D. 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b). 
      
      DeRouin's Motion for Attorney's Fees on Appeal is denied.