Case ID: sw3d_416/html/0347-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Antoin JOHNSON, Employee/Appellant, v. MERS/MO GOODWILL INDUSTRIES, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 99855.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Dec. 17, 2013.
    Antoin Johnson, St. Louis, MO, Acting Pro Se for Employee/Appellant.
    MERS/Missouri Goodwill Industries, St. Louis, MO, Acting Pro Se for Employer/Respondent.
    Diana Mejia, St. Louis, MO, for Employer/Respondent.
    Bart A. Matante, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.
    Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Antoin Johnson appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying her unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission’s decision is supported by substantial and competent evidence. Berwin v. Lindenwood Female College, 205 S.W.8d 291, 294 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for oúr decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).