Case ID: so2d_497/html/1315-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BARFIELD, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John J. NEILLY, Jr., Appellant, v. MARK JAY KAUFMAN, P.A., Appellee.
    No. BL-8.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Nov. 25, 1986.
    Stephen A. Rappenecker, of Stephen A. Rappenecker, P.A., Gainesville, for appellant.
    Kenneth E. Brooten, Jr., of Kenneth E. Brooten, Jr., P.A., Gainesville, for appellee.
   BARFIELD, Judge.

The trial court could not properly issue the injunction in this case because there was no showing of continuing conduct with the likelihood of irreparable harm and no showing that an adequate remedy at law was not available. This was not a disciplinary proceeding under the Florida Bar Integration Rule, article XI, Rule 11.14. The preliminary injunction dated December 20, 1985, against John J. Neilly, Jr., is QUASHED.

ERVIN and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.