Case ID: f2d_446/html/0224-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Edward Elmer DIXON, Appellant.
    No. 71-1134.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    July 7, 1971.
    Louis L. Deckter (argued), Tucson, Ariz., for appellant.
    Stanley L. Patchell (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Richard K. Burke, U. S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for appellee. •
    Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The main objection is that one exhibit was admitted without sufficient foundation. But we hold there was some identification and that the objection to admission was not specific enough.

As to the necessity of preserving material footprints, the point is a good jury argument, but such procedure is not a legal requirement. United States v. Hull, 9 Cir., 441 F.2d 1165, decided May 10, 1971.