Case ID: us_374/html/0497-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

REGALADO v. CALIFORNIA et al.
    No. 10, Misc.
    Decided June 17, 1963.
    Petitioner pro se.
    
    
      Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California,.William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and S. Clark Moore, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of California is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Ker v. California, ante, p. 23, and McDonald v. United States, 335 U. S. 451.

Mr. Justice Harlan concurs in the result.