Case ID: f-appx_114/html/0566-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Peter C. ANDRESEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PROVIDENT BANK OF MARYLAND; Gary A. Rosen, Trustee; Defendants—Appellees, and United States Trustee for the District of Maryland, Trustee—Appellee.
    No. 04-2032.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 18, 2004.
    Decided Nov. 23, 2004.
    Peter C. Andresen, Appellant pro se. Mark S. Devan, Covahey, Boozer, Devan & Dore, P.A., Towson, Maryland; Gary A. Rosen, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    
      
      Affirmed by unpublished PEE CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Peter C. Andresen appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Andresen v. Provident Bank, No. CA-03-3567-AW; BK-01-25370 (D. Md. filed June 30, 2004 & entered July 1, 2004; July 14, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED