Case ID: us_322/html/0713-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 992.
    Weber v. Henderson et al., Executrices, et al.
    
      Messrs. Meyer M. Semel and Geo. H. Ro-senstein for appellant.
    
      Mr. Michael J. Bruder for ap-pellees.
    May 29, 1944.
   Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Memphis v. United States, 97 U. S. 293, 295, 297; McFaddin v. Evans-Snider-Buel Co., 185 U. S. 505, 510-13; Graham & Foster v. Goodcell, 282 U. S. 409, 429-30; Paramino Lumber Co. v. Marshall, 309 U. S. 370, 377-79. (2) Richmond Mortgage Corp. v. Wachovia Bank Co., 300 U. S. 124, 130-31; Gelfert v. National City Bank, 313 U. S. 221, 235.