Case ID: neb_180/html/0893-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "McCown, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary Kula, appellant, v. Tom Kula, appellee, Joe Kula et al., interveners-appellees.
    146 N. W. 2d 384
    Filed November 18, 1966.
    No. 36469.
    Kelley, Grant & Costello, for appellant.
    Lathrop & Albracht, for appellee.
    Heard before White, C. J., Carter, Spencer, Boslaugh, Smith, and McCown, JJ., and Boyles, District Judge.
   McCown, J.

The defendant and appellee has filed a motion in this court for an order requiring the plaintiff and appellant to surrender possession of a dwelling in accordance with the final decree of the district court in a divorce action. Although the case is now pending on appeal in this court, no supersedeas was filed. The appeal, therefore, does not operate as a stay of proceedings. The district court has jurisdiction and may enforce the award as in the case of any other nonsuperseded judgment. See Hall v. Hall, 176 Neb. 555, 126 N. W. 2d 839. The motion is therefore denied.

Motion denied.