Case ID: neb_42/html/0846-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Irvine, C.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas P. Stephens v. Ephraim Smith.
    Filed November 21, 1894.
    No. 5957.
    Sufficiency of Evidence to Sustain "Verdict: Review. The evidence examined, and held sufficient to sustain the verdict.
    Error from the district court of Boone county. Tried below before Harrison, J.
    
      N. C. Pratt, for plaintiff in error.
    
      James S. Armstrong and F. 8. Howell, contra.
    
   Irvine, C.

The only assignment of error in this case which is presented in the briefs is that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence. No question of law is involved, and a statement or discussion of the facts would, therefore, be useless. An examination of the record persuades us that while the evidence on behalf of the defendant in error was neither conclusive nor very convincing, it was sufficient to sustain the verdict, and the judgment is, therefore,

Affirmed.

Harrison, J., having presided in court below took no part in the decision.