Case ID: misc_181/html/0005-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Irving Frankel, Respondent, v. Peerless Sugar Co., Inc., Respondent, and City of New York, Defendant-Appellant.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    October 22, 1943.
    
      Ignatius M. Wilkinson, Corporation Counsel (Daniel A. Riordan of counsel), for defendant-appellant.
    
      Edythe Widdi for plaintiff-respondent.
    
      Charles G. Hill for defendant-respondent.
   Memorandum

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs. Appeal from judgment in favor of the defendant Peerless $ugar Co., Inc., dismissed.

The judgment in favor of the defendant Peerless Sugar Co., Inc., is not appealable by the defendant City of New York. (Price v. Ryan, 255 N. Y. 16; Ward v. Iroquois Gas Corp., 258 N. Y. 124; Epstein v. National Transportation Co., 287 N. Y. 456.)

MacCratb, MoCooiy and Steinbrink, JJ., concur.