Case ID: so2d_737/html/0629-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sandra BLACKMON, Appellant, v. Scott HEAD, Appellee.
    No. 98-1573.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    July 27, 1999.
    Eugene K. Polk, of McKenzie & Solo-way, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellant.
    Scott Head, Pro Se, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

There is no basis for the trial court’s finding that appehee pled comparative negligence, and no competent substantial evidence supports the court’s findings that appellant knew or should have known ap-pellee-was impaired or that appellee was impaired. Accordingly, the trial court erred in determining that appellant was comparatively neghgent and in reducing appellant’s damage award. We reverse. On remand the trial court shall enter judgment for the full amount for appellant.

BARFIELD, C.J., MINER and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.