Case ID: ccpa_52-2/html/1030-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam :", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

339 F.2d 717; 144 USPQ 1
    John O. Paivinen v. Eugene A. Sands
    (No. 7226)
    United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals,
    February 11, 1965
    
      Fidler, Bradley, Patnaude & Petherhridge (Raymond E. Fidler and Charles W. Bradley, Jr., of counsel) for appellant.
    
      Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Taylor and Adams (J. Phillip Anderegg, of counsel) for appellee.
    Before Rich, Acting Chief Judge, and Martin, Smith, and Almond, Jr., Associate Judges, and Judge William H. Kirkpatrick
    
    
      
      United States Senior District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, designated to participate in place of Chief Judge Worley, pursuant to provisions of Section 294(d), Title 28, united States Code.
    
   On Petition for Correction of Opinion

Pee Curiam :

By order of the Court, appellee’s petition for correction of opinion dated January 11, 1965, is granted only to the extent of changing the language of the original opinion as follows:

On page 21, lines 3 and 4, change comma after the word “oscilloscope” to a period, and delete the remainder of the sentence.