Case ID: so2d_270/html/0043-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard Donald PIFER, Appellant, v. Ann E. PIFER, Appellee.
    No. 72-208.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Dec. 13, 1972.
    Charles J. Cheves, Jr., of Hazen, Isphord-ing, Hazen & Cheves, Venice, for appellant.
    Archie M. Odom, of Farr, Farr, Hay-mans, Moseley & Odom, Punta Gorda, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The amount ordered for support of these parties’ five children is not unreasonable, but the award of attorney’s fees is predicated upon evidence which clearly takes into account work done by appellee’s lawyers on matters unrelated to the present case, and 'should be reconsidered by the trial judge. See Scanlon v. Scanlon, Fla.App. 1st 1963, 154 So.2d 899.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

PIERCE, C. J., and MANN and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.