Case ID: ad_228/html/0865-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Application of Clarence Dunham for the Examination of Ballots Pursuant to Provisions of Section 333 of the Election Law of the State of New York.
   Order affirmed, without costs. Hinman, Acting P. J., Whitmyer and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur; Davis and Hill, JJ., dissent and vole for reversal on the ground that there were no facts shown upon which the discretion of the justice might be exercised. 
      
      See Laws of 1928, chap. 678, as amd.— [Rep.