Case ID: f-appx_531/html/0781-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julian GRAVES, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 12-30268.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 18, 2013.
    
    Filed June 21, 2013.
    Helen J. Brunner, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Marci Lynette Ellsworth, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Jason Brett Saunders, Law Offices of Gordon & Saunders, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    
      Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Julian Graves appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges a supervised release condition imposed following his plea of nolo contendere for receipt of visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2) and (b)(1); and possession of visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B) and (b)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Graves contends that the district court erred by imposing a standard condition of supervised release, which mandates that he “shall not frequent places where controlled substances are illegally sold, used, distributed, or administered,” because the condition is impermissibly vague and over-broad. Graves’s contention is foreclosed. See United States v. Phillips, 704 F.3d 754, 768 (9th Cir.2012), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 2796, 186 L.Ed.2d 864, 2013 WL 497631 (June 10, 2013).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.