Case ID: sw3d_205/html/0324-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cary BECKER, Respondent, v. Deborah NUELLE, Appellant.
    No. ED 86654.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Nov. 14, 2006.
    James M. Martin, Heidi L. Leopold, Saint Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Daniel M. Roddy, Saint Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Deborah Nuelle appeals the judgment ordering the sale of certain real property owned by her and her brother, Cary Becker, as joint tenants and the court’s non-responsive denial of her request to be reimbursed for money she spent settling their deceased mother’s estate. The judgment was supported by substantial evidence, and the court did not misstate or misapply the law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).