Case ID: pa_325/html/0048-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sholter’s Appeal.
    Argued November 23, 1936.
    Before Kephart, C. J., Soi-iafeer, Maxey, Linn, Stern and Barnes, JJ.
    
      W. E. Daniels, with him J. Dress Pannell, for appellants.
    
      Geo. Ross Hull, for candidate.
    November 24, 1936:
   Per Curiam,

Upon careful review of the record, we are of opinion that the conclusion of the court below is correct, but, as the question is moot, we can only dismiss the appeal at appellants’ cost.