Case ID: f-appx_472/html/0906-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Garfield BIRMINGHAM, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 11-14228
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    July 25, 2012.
    Kimberly Dunn Abel, U.S. Attorney’s Office, West Palm Beach, FL, Wifredo A. Ferrer, Anne Ruth Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Garfield Birmingham, FCI Edgefield, Edgefield, SC, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before CARNES, WILSON and FAY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Gary Kollin, appointed counsel for Garfield Birmingham, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Birmingham’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.