Case ID: sw3d_510/html/0900-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Samie J. LOUIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    ED 104060
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    Filed: February 21, 2017
    Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
    Josh Hawley, Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, for respondent.
    Before; James M. Dowd, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sarnie J. Louis (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of. the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2015). 
      
      . All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2015, unless otherwise indicated,