Case ID: so2d_619/html/0996-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Orville Mack BAILEY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Linda BAILEY, n/k/a Linda Redd, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
    No. 92-01871.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    May 12, 1993.
    Rehearing Denied June 16, 1993.
    Gerald C. Surfus and Philip S. Prosch, Surfus & Prosch, Sarasota, for appellant, cross-appellee.
    Stevan T. Northcutt, Levine, Hirsch, Se-gall & Northcutt, Tampa, for appellee, cross-appellant.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the amended final judgment in this dissolution proceeding in all respects. The order taxing attorney’s fees and costs contains a miscalculation that inadvertently omitted $6,330.00 in taxable costs. On remand, this error should be corrected. As a result, the balancé due to the wife’s attorneys in the order taxing attorney’s fees and costs should be increased from $17,-529.52 to $23,859.52.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.