Case ID: blume-sup-ct-trans_3/html/0135-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DAVID FRARY AND ENOCH FIFIELD versus WILLIAM G. TAYLOR, WOLCOTT LAWRENCE, LOWRIN MARSH AND HEMAN BROWN
   Journal Entries (1820-22): Journal3: (1) Rule to bring bodies *p. 62; (2) death suggested, motion for substitution *p. 195; (3) continued *p. 227; (4) continued *p. 335; (5) continuance taken off, rule for judgment *p. 347.

Papers in File: (i) Precipe for process; (2) capias and return; (3) draft of declaration; (4) declaration; (5) motion for judgment for want of plea; (6) precipe for ca. sa.; (7) petition for stay of proceedings; (8) affidavit of Augustus Thorp; (9) affidavit of Henry Disbrow; (10) affidavit of William G. Taylor; (11) precipe for writ of supersedeas, and allowance; (12) petition for writ of error coram nobis; (13) affidavit of William G. Taylor; (14) precipe for writ of error coram nobis; (15) allowance of writ of error coram nobis; (16) writ of fi. fa., return and receipt; (17) contract for delivery of logs; (18) award of arbitrators.

Office Docket, MS p. 151, c. 76. Recorded in Book B, MS pp. 33-37.