Case ID: so2d_193/html/0230-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nathaniel WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. James BRAY, Appellee.
    No. 364.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.
    Dec. 21, 1966.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 18, 1967.
    Norman C. Roettger, Jr., of Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    J. Jay Simons and Sheldon J. Schlesinger of Simons & Schlesinger, Hollywood, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Nathaniel Williams, appeals an order granting plaintiff, James Bray, a new trial. We have reviewed the briefs and the record and find that the court did not abuse its discretion in granting a new trial. Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 669; Collins Fruit Company v. Giglio, Fla.App.1966, 184 So.2d 447. As the granting of a new trial was proper there is no ' need to discuss the remaining points raised on appeal.

Affirmed.

ANDREWS, Acting C. J., WALDEN, J., and TROWBRIDGE, C. PFEIFFER, Associate Judge, concur.