Case ID: so2d_342/html/0505-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. William R. OMASTA, Jr., Respondent.
    No. 48949.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Feb. 3, 1977.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
    Sondra Goldenfarb of Joseph G. Donahey, Jr., Clearwater, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, ENGLAND and KARL, JJ., concur.

BOYD, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., dissent.