Case ID: so2d_566/html/0372-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Philip NEWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 89-2508.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Sept. 12, 1990.
    Arthur P. Cohen, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Miles Ferris, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We hold that appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief as originally filed adequately specifies the facts supporting the motion, as Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 requires. We reverse the trial court’s order denying the amended motion, and remand for consideration of the motion on its merits.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.