Case ID: ad_247/html/0806-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: Esther Alpern, Judgment Creditor, Respondent, v. Edwin S. Denham and Edwin A. Denham, Judgment Debtors, Appellants, and Elsa Denham, Judgment Debtor.
   Order appointing receiver in proceedings supplementary to execution reversed on the law, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. Inasmuch as the proceedings were brought in the County Court, a justice of the Supreme Court was without jurisdiction to appoint a receiver. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.