Case ID: sw3d_577/html/0526-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kavin RACHEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 106679
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    Filed: June 25, 2019
    FOR APPELLANT: N. Scott Rosenblum, Jessica Hathaway, 120 South Central Avenue, Suite 130, Clayton, Missouri 63105.
    FOR RESPONDENT: Evan J. Buchheim, Eric Schmitt, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., James M. Dowd, J., and Robin Ransom, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM

Kavin D. Rachel appeals the denial following an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).