Case ID: nj_113/html/0508-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOSE RAFAEL PADILLA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. CONCORD PLASTICS, INC., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
    Argued November 28, 1988
    Decided December 29, 1988.
    
      George M. Boyd argued the cause for appellant (Albert W. Seaman, attorney).
    
      Sheldon Schiffman argued the cause for respondent (Fred S. Brause, Jr., attorney).
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 221 N.J.Super. 301 (1987).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN join in this opinion.

Opposed — None.