Case ID: so2d_823/html/0299-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Derrick HANNA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D01-3543.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Aug. 14, 2002.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Godfrey, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Consuelo Maingot, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before JORGENSON, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Derrick Hanna appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. During the pendency of this appeal, the trial court corrected a scrivener’s error in the sentencing order in one of the appellant’s cases, so that as corrected, the sentencing orders now are consistent with the sentence length agreed to in the original plea bargain.

The defendant in his pro se submission argues that Walters v. State, 812 So.2d 457 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), prohibits the restructuring of the appellant’s sentences in order to carry out the original sentencing intent. To the contrary, the Walters decision confirms that such a restructuring is permissible.

Affirmed.