Case ID: f-appx_404/html/0212-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David CASAS-HERRERA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 10-50107.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.
    
    Filed Nov. 22, 2010.
    Christopher Seth Askins, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Timothy Robert Garrison, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

David Casas-Herrera appeals from the 10-month sentence imposed following revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Casas-Herrera contends that the sentence is unreasonable because the district court procedurally erred in failing to adequately address his mitigating arguments and explain the reasons for imposing a 10-month sentence. The record reflects that the district court did not procedurally err. See Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 358-59, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007). The record also reflects that, under the totality of the circumstances, Casas-Herrera’s sentence is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51-52, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); see also United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.