Case ID: f2d_715/html/0157-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

EDWARDS COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONOGRAM INDUSTRIES, INC., Monotronics, Inc. and Entronic Company, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 82-2019.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Sept. 2, 1983.
    Larry D. Knippa, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.
    
      Dan Matthews, Houston, Tex., for Monogram Industries, Inc.
    Charles L. Babcock, Dallas, Tex., for amicus curiae Nat. Realty Committee, Inc.
    ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
    (Opinion March 21, 1983, 5 Cir., 1983, 700 F.2d 994)
    Before CLARK, Chief Judge, BROWN, GEE, RUBIN, REAYLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
   BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.