Case ID: f-appx_199/html/0876-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darian TENSLEY, a.k.a. Drac, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 04-10862
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Oct. 6, 2006.
    Susan Hollis Rothstein-Youakim, Tamra Phipps, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Robert C. Port, Cohen Goldstein Port & Gottlieb, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before BLACK, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Robert C. Port, counsel for Darían Tensley in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Tensley’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.