Case ID: bta_33/html/0872-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Murdock :", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harry O. Johnson, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
    Docket No. 66991.
    Promulgated January 7, 1936.
    
      J. E. Marshall, Esq., for the respondent.
   Murdock :

The Commissioner determined a deficiency of $8,617.33 in the petitioner’s income tax for 1925 and also determined that $4,308.67 was due as a penalty provided by section 275 (b) of the Revenue Act of 1926. Although the petitioner filed a*-so-called petition, he did not appear at the hearing nor did anyone appear on his behalf. The Commissioner in his answer alleged facts to support the imposition of the fraud penalty. No reply to the Commissioner’s answer was filed. The Commissioner, nevertheless, offered evidence to support the imposition of the fraud penalty.

FINDINGS OF FACT.

A part of the deficiency for 1925 was due to fraud with intent to evade tax.

Decision will be entered for the respondent.