Case ID: f-appx_114/html/0941-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ermias GEBRAY, aka Sam Gebray, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 03-35998.
    D.C. No. CV-01-00755-REJ.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 6, 2004.
    
    Decided Dec. 15, 2004.
    Ermias Gebray, Portland, OR, pro se.
    
      Glen McClendon, Esq., Lindsay, Hart, Ned & Weigler, Portland, OR, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Ermias Gebray appeals pro se the district court’s judgment following a two-day jury trial in Gebray’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that his constitutional rights were violated when the Portland International Airport restricted his airport shuttle van’s access to the airport. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We are unable to review Gebray’s contention that the district court judge made improper comments to the jury during his trial because Gebray failed to provide copies of the trial transcripts. See Fed. R.App. 10(b)(2); Syncom Capital Corp. v. Wade, 924 F.2d 167, 169 (9th Cir.1991) (per curiam).

Gebray’s contention that his attorney should have objected to the selection of certain jurors is unpersuasive. See Campbell v. Kincheloe, 829 F.2d 1453, 1464 (9th Cir.1987) (counsel must be allowed a wide latitude with regard to the making of tactical decisions).

Gebray’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.