Case ID: so2d_760/html/1093-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Vanrea J. BROOKS, Appellant, v. Suzanne SHORE, et al., Appellees.
    No. 3D99-2500.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 28, 2000.
    Leslie Holland, Miami, for appellant.
    Bedzow, Korn, Brown, Miller & Zemel, P.A., and Robert B. Miller and Teri L. Di Giulian, Aventura; Jason Bloch, Assistant County Attorney, for appellees.
    Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and GREEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Mendelsund v. Southern-Aire Coats of Florida, Inc., 210 So.2d 229, 231 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968) (“Generally, there is a presumption that an attorney, as an officer of the court, is duly authorized to act for a client whom he professes to represent. In the absence of some pleading questioning the attorney’s acts ..., the presumption is conclusive.”).