Case ID: f-appx_178/html/0276-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael F. DEHONEY, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Jonathan E. OZMINT, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; Henry McMaster, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents—Appellees. Henry F. Dehoney, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Jonathan E. Ozmint, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; Henry McMaster, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents—Appellees.
    Nos. 05-7534, 05-7535, 05-7536.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 27, 2006.
    Decided: May 3, 2006.
    Michael F. Dehoney, Appellant Pro Se. Barton Jon Vincent, Davidson, Morrison & Lindemann, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Michael F. Dehoney appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and construing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) and dismissing the complaint and the order denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Dehoney v. Ozmint, Nos. CA-04-21981-HMH-BHH; CA-04-22025-HMH-BHH; CA-04-22026-HMH-BMH (D.S.C. Aug. 10 & 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED