Case ID: f-cas_1/html/1127-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "ERSKINE, District Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Case No. 533.
    In re ARLEDGE.
    [1 N. B. R. (1873,) 644, (Quarto, 195.)]
    District Court, S. D. Georgia.
    Bankruptcy — Tne Assignee — Prior Assignment for Benefit of Creditors.
    [An assignment for benefit of creditors, without fraud, of all a man’s property, a year before his petition in bankruptcy, is valid as against the .assignee in bankruptcy, who takes ■only such rights as the bankrupt had at the time of his bankruptcy.]
    [See Mayer v. Heilman, 91 U. S. 496; In re Kimball, Case No. 7,770.]
    [In bankruptcy. Certificate to district -court by register of question arising before him. Affirmed.]
    I, the undersigned, having been designated by the court as the register in bankruptcy before whom the proceedings, in the above matter of the bankruptcy of George H. Arledge are to be had, do hereby certify, that in the due course of such proceedings the following question pertinent to the same arose, and was stated by Peter V. Robinson, assignee of the effects of the said bankrupt, namely: The said George H. Arledge, some twelve months prior to his filing his petition in bankruptcy, conveyed by deed of assignments, for the benefit of all his creditors, all his stock in trade, choses in action, books of account and property of every kind to one John H. Thomas; from the proceeds of the sale of said property a dividend of ten per cent, has been paid by the said Thomas, a balance of money, and the books •of account, still remain in his hand. Is the ■said assignee in bankruptcy entitled to receive from the said John H. Thomas the money and property not yet distributed among the creditors? And the said party requested that the same should be certified to your honor for your opinion thereon. Prank S. Hesseltine, Register in Bankruptcy for Said District.
    Opinion of the Register. It is my opinion that the assignee is not entitled to recover the said money and books of account in the hands of the said John H. Thomas. The deed of assignment conveys to the as-signee “ail the estate, real and personal, of the bankrupt, with afi his deeds, books, and papers relating thereto, and such assignment shall relate back to the commencement of said proceedings in bankruptcy.” Bankrupt Act, § 14, (Rice’s Manual, general clause 46). By this clause of the bankrupt act it appears that all the property of the bankrupt — the title and right to which was in the bankrupt at the time of filing his petition — and that only, passes to the as-signee. Property which previous to that time had been lawfully conveyed or assigned to any person by the bankrupt does not pass to the assignee, the title having gone out of the bankrupt and become vested in the person to whom it was conveyed or assigned. The assignee acquires by the deed of assignment the like right, title, power, and authority to sell, manage, dispose of, sue for, and recover or defend the property or estate as the bankrupt might or could have had if no assignment had been made. Bankrupt Act, § 14, (Rice’s Manual, general clause 52.)
    By section 35 of the act a conveyance or assignment, made by a person being insolvent within four months before the filing of the petition by, or against him, of any part of his property, a person having reasonable cause to believe such a person insolvent, with a view to give a preference to ahy creditor; or a like conveyance within six months before the filing of the petition, with a view to prevent the property from coming to his assignee in bankruptcy, or to defeat the object of, or in any way impair, or delay the operation of this act, &c., are void, and the assignee may recover the property, or the value of it. This section does not apply to this assignment, made more than twelve months before the filing of his petition by the bankrupt, and made for the benefit of ail his creditors. In the case of Mitchell v. Winslow, [Case No. 9,673,] Justice Story says: “that it is a well established doctrine that (except in cases of fraud) assignees in bankruptcy take only such rights and interests as the bankrupt himself had, and could himself claim and assert at the time of his bankruptcy.”
    Lord Hardwicke,
    in the case of Brown v. Heathcote, 1 Atk. 160-162: “The ground that the court go upon is this, that assignees of bankrupts, though they are trustees for the creditors, yet stand in the place of the bankrupt, and they can take in no better manner than he could; therefore assignments of choses in action for a valuable consideration have been held good against such assignees.” In the case of Mitford v. Mitford, 9 Yes. 87, 100, Sir William Grant said: “I have always understood the assignments from the commissioners, like any other assignments by operation of law, passed his (the bankrupt’s) rights precisely in the same plight and condition as he passed them.” See, also, Bedford v. Perkins, 3 Car. & P. 90; [Fisher v. Miller,] 1 Bing. 150; [Xoung v. Taylor,] 2 Moore, 336; [Crowfoot v. Gurney,] 9 Bing. 372. The said Arledge’s right and interest in this property claimed by the assignee, ceased on the execution of the deed of assignment to Thomas, subject to the condition that if, after the payment in fuil of the creditors, there should be a balance in his hands, that remainder would be the property of Arledge, and the right to receive that remainder is all the right his assignees in bankruptcy acquired by the deed of the register. That is the reason why the forms of proceedings in bankruptcy adopted by the supreme court of the United States require that property previously conveyed should be set forth under the heads of Property in Reversión, Remainder and Expectancy, Schedule B, 4. There has been no claim proved against this bankrupt, and he has petitioned for his discharge.
    Prank S. Hesseltine, Register.
   ERSKINE, District Judge.

The decision of the register is affirmed. The clerk will certify accordingly.