Case ID: del-cas_1/html/0356-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

POLK’S LESSEE v. MINNER and THORN.
    Supreme Court. Sussex.
    October, 1794.
    
      Bayard’s Notebook, 77.
    
    
      Peery, Wilson and Miller for plaintiff. Bidgely, Vining and Bayard for defendant.
    
      
       This case is also reported in Wilson’s Red Book, 22.
      
    
   Upon a common rule to take depositions, notice had been given to Minner, the tenant in possession, but none to Thorn, the landlord. For want of notice to Thorn the depositions were objected to; and the Court ruled that notice should have been given of the taking of the depositions to the landlord; and not having been given, the depositions could not be read.