Case ID: nys_139/html/1131-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re LORD.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    January 24, 1913.)
    In the matter of John B. Lord, an attorney.
   PER CURIAM.

Motion for reargument denied. The court decided that the evidence submitted, together with the presumption of professional integrity arising from many years’ practice at the bar, and with which the court could not be unacquainted, preponderatingly showed that the respondent was not guilty of the charge. See, also, 138 N. Y. Supp. 1126.

BURR, J., not voting.