Case ID: sw3d_46/html/0688-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James P. MARTIN, Plaintiff/Cross-Respondent/Appellant, v. James S. FLOERCHINGER, Defendant/Cross-Claimant/Respondent.
    No. ED 77589.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    June 19, 2001.
    Gregory P. White, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Gregory Brough, Clayton, MO, for respondent. .
    Before MARY K. HOFF, C.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Sr., JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment in defendant’s favor on his claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and quantum meruit. Plaintiff contends that the weight of the evidence supports his unjust enrichment claim. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.1976). No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84 .16(b).