Case ID: sw2d_805/html/0741-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Suggs WILLIS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 57345.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    March 26, 1991.
    Henry B. Robertson, Loyce Hamilton, Asst. Public Defenders, St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Geoffrey W. Prekshot, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of tampering in the first degree, § 569.080.1(2), RSMo 1986. We affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only which sets forth the facts and the reasons for our order affirming the judgment in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).