Case ID: so2d_550/html/1182-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

E.W., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 88-625.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 31, 1989.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before NESBITT, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The trial court acted within the bounds of sound discretion in excluding certain of respondent’s statements which had not been disclosed to the defense in discovery. Other statements about which respondent complains were actually made known to the defense in pretrial deposition. The procedure followed by the trial court was consistent with Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971).

Affirmed.