Case ID: sw3d_327/html/0629-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Christopher BRUEGGER, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 94169.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Dec. 21, 2010.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, Kate E. Noland, Jefferson City, MO, for Plaintiff/Respondent.
    Margaret M. Johnston, Columbia, MO, for Defendant/Appellant.
    Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.j:, CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Bruegger (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of five counts of sécond-degree statutory sodomy and two counts of second-degree child molestation. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the prosecutor’s line of questioning. State v. Tokar, 918 S.W.2d 753, 770 (Mo.banc 1996). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).