Case ID: f-appx_227/html/0884-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Pat GADSON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-15374
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    June 8, 2007.
    Alvin E. Entin, Entin, Margules & Della Fera, P.A., FT Lauderdale, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before WILSON, PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Alvin E. Entin, appointed counsel for Jeffrey Gadson, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issue of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gadson’s revocation of supervise release and sentence is AFFIRMED.