Case ID: f-appx_127/html/0853-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Diruby Thomas FOSTER, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 04-1273.
    United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
    April 14, 2005.
    Daniel R. Hurley, Elizabeth A. Stafford, U.S. Attorney's Office, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Mark H. Magidson, Detroit, MI, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before MARTIN, COOK, and LAY, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The Honorable Donald P. Lay, Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM.

Diruby Thomas Foster pleaded guilty below to being a felon in possession of a firearm. His plea agreement waived all appellate rights, except with regard to whether the evidence against him, which the district court refused to suppress, was the fruit of an illegal search and seizure. After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, the panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed in this case, Fed. R.App. P. 34(a), and that the district court’s refusal to suppress the evidence was based on a credibility finding that was not clearly erroneous. We therefore affirm the conviction.

We also deny Poster’s motion to remand for resentencing in light of United States v. Booker,—U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738,160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), because Foster waived his right to raise this issue on appeal. See United States v. Bradley, 400 F.3d 459, 465-66, 2005 U.S.App. LEXIS 3970, at *18-*19 (6th Cir.2005) (dismissing Booker claim because defendant’s plea agreement waived right to appeal).