Case ID: so2d_675/html/0118-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SHAW, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Earl L. CRAMER, Petitioner, v. BROEDELL PLUMBING SUPPLY, et al., Respondents.
    No. 86709.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    June 13, 1996.
    Alex Lancaster and Amy L. Sergent of Lancaster and Eure, P.A., Sarasota, and Claire Hamner Matturro, Cairo, Georgia, for Petitioner.
    James G. Trope and Elizabeth J. Muller of Florida Employers Insurance Service Corporation, Sarasota, for Respondents.
    Edward A. Dion, General Counsel and David C. Hawkins, Senior Attorney, Tallahassee, for Intervenor, Department of Labor and Employment Security, Division of Workers’ Compensation.
   SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Cramer v. Brodell Plumbing Co., 661 So.2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), wherein the district court certified:

Whether section [440.15(3)(b)4.d.], Florida Statutes (1991), is subject to and comports with the requirements of Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have already answered in the affirmative. See Barry v. Burdines, 675 So.2d 587 (Fla.1996). We approve Cramer.

It is so ordered.

KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.