Case ID: ad3d_12/html/0259-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Stefan Papasoff, Respondent-Appellant, v Elizabeth C. Cockrell, Appellant-Respondent.
    [786 NYS2d 2]
   Order, Family Court, New York County (George L. Jurow, J.), entered on or about March 6, 2003, which granted petitioner father’s application for counsel fees only insofar as to award him $30,000, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to direct that petitioner be awarded the full amount of the fees incurred by him in litigating respondent’s relocation of the parties’ daughter to Colorado, including, to the extent the court in its discretion deems it appropriate, the fees incurred by him in connection with the instant application, and otherwise affirmed, without costs, and the matter remanded for a determination of the additional amount to be awarded.

Despite a recent court order denying her permission to do so, respondent mother relocated the parties’ child from New York to Colorado. The reasonable legal fees incurred by petitioner father in seeking to undo this unilateral, illegal conduct should have been fully recoverable (see Domestic Relations Law § 237 [b]; Kasal v Kasal, 297 AD2d 624 [2002], lv dismissed 99 NY2d 552 [2002]). The court has discretion to grant, in addition, counsel fees incurred by petitioner in connection with the instant fee application (see O’Shea v O’Shea, 93 NY2d 187 [1999]).

Reargument granted and upon reargument, the decision and order of this Court entered herein on May 25, 2004 (7 AD3d 442) is hereby recalled and vacated. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.