Case ID: nj_53/html/0344-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LAWRENCE H. ROSENTHAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND t/a INDUSTRIAL REALTY AND FEIST & FEIST, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ART METAL, INC., ETC., AND GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, ETC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
    Argued March 5, 1969
    Decided March 17, 1969.
    
      Mr. Edwin II. Stern argued the cause for appellant, Eeist & Eeist (Messrs. Hellring, Lindeman & Landau, attorneys).
    
      Mr. Joel Sóndale argued the cause for appellant Lawrence H. Rosenthal (Messrs. Olein, Olein & Sóndale, attorneys; Messrs. Schechner & Targan, of counsel).
    
      Mr. William L. Dill, Jr., argued the cause for respondent General Dynamics Corp. (Messrs. Sirylcer, Tams & Dill, attorneys; Mr. W. Hunt Dumont, of counsel).
    
      Mr. Richard R. Hellsiern argued the cause for respondent Art Metal, Inc. (Messrs. Lowenstein, Sandler, Brochin & Kohl, attorneys; Mr. Murry D. Brochin and Mr. Richard R. Hellsiern, of counsel).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, 101 N. J. Super. 156.

For affirmance—Justices Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman—6.

For reversal—None.