Case ID: nys_133/html/1118-12.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DIXON, Respondent, v. SNOOK, Appellant. MAHANNA, Appellant, v. PHILIPS, Respondent. OTIS, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    October, 1911.)
    Actions by Charles Dixon against Cortland Snook, by Jane Mahanna against Frank Philips, and by James S. Otis against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.
   No opinions. The foregoing cases, having been twice reached in their regular order upon the calendar, and twice passed, are dismissed, under general rule 39. See, also, 65 Misc. Rep. 166, 119 N. Y. Supp. 360; 131 N. Y. Supp. 1127.