Case ID: sw2d_856/html/0695-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James H. HUDDLESTON, Respondent, v. Kathy Sue HUDDLESTON, Appellant.
    No. 62033.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    July 20, 1993.
    Byron Cohen, Clayton, for appellant.
    James H. Huddleston, pro se.
    Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals the dissolution decree granting Father custody of the child of the marriage. We find the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 84.16(b)(1).

We also determine an opinion in this matter would have no precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm by written order. A memorandum for the parties’ use only has been prepared.

Judgment affirmed.