Case ID: idaho_14/html/0464-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(March 5, 1908.)
    FARMERS’ CO-OPERATIVE DITCH COMPANY, a Corporation, Respondent, v. RIVERSIDE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, LTD., et al., Defendants and Respondents; NEW YORK CANAL COMPANY, LTD., Defendant and Appellant.
    [94 Pac. 764.]
    APPEAL from the District Conrt of the Third Judicial District for the County of Ada. Hon. George H. Stewart, Judge.
    Action by the plaintiff to have the rights and priorities of the appropriators of water from the Boise river determined and decreed. Cause tried and decree entered for the several claimants. Defendant, the New York Canal Company, appealed from the judgment.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    E. J. Frawley, and W. E. Borah, for Appellant.
    J. C. Rice, Frank Martin, F. J. Smith, Silas Moody, Karl Paine, Walter Griffiths, Smith & Scatterday, S. H. Hays, Ira E. Barber, H. E. Wallace, W. A. Stone, and J. L. Niday, for Respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

This appeal by the New York Canal Company is taken in the same case and from the judgment that has been considered in Farmers’ Co-operative Ditch Company v. Riverside Irrigation District et al., Respondents, and Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District, Appellant, just decided by this court, ante, p. 450, 94 Pac. 761. The same questions are involved in this appeal as on that, and upon the authority of that case the judgment from which this appeal is taken will be affirmed. Costs in favor of respondents.