Case ID: sw2d_829/html/0131-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gregory GARDNER, Claimant/Respondent, v. BUSHNELL CARPET, INC., Employer/Appellant.
    No. 61268.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    May 26, 1992.
    John F. Sander, Riethmann Soebbing and Valentine, St. Louis, for employer, appellant.
    Robert R. Schwarz, Clayton, for claimant, respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employer appeals from an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission allowing compensation and affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge against the employer. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).