Case ID: nj-eq_120/html/0198-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

May M. Brittingham et al., respondents, v. Huyler's, a New York corporation, et al., appellants.
    [Decided April 24th, 1936.]
    
      Mr. Charles Jones and Messrs. Harrison & Roche, for the respondents.
    
      Messrs. Lum, Tamblyn & Fairlie, for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 118 N. J. Eq. 352.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Llotd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, RAFFERTT, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Donges, WolfsKeil, JJ. 2.