Case ID: f-appx_443/html/0856-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ramona WILLIAMS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Lisa BURGRESS, Officer employed by the local U.S. Marshals Service; DOE # 2, Officer employed by the local U.S. Marshals Service; DOE # 3, Officer employed by the local U.S. Marshals Service; DOE # 4, Officer employed by the local U.S. Marshals Service; DOE # 5, Officer employed by the local U.S. Marshals Service, Defendants—Appellees, and United States Marshals Service; Unknown Officer of Untied States Marshals Service, Defendants.
    No. 10-6798.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 18, 2011.
    Decided: Aug. 22, 2011.
    Ramona Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
    
      Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ramona Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Williams’ civil rights action, and a subsequent order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Burgess, No. 3:09-cv-00115-REP, 2010 WL 1957105 (E.D. Va. May 13, 2010); (June 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.