Case ID: so2d_387/html/0515-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert R. JOHNSON, husband, Appellant/Petitioner, v. Sharon JOHNSON, wife, Appellee/Respondent.
    Nos. 78-1396, 78-1439 and 78-1592.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Sept. 3, 1980.
    James R. Rich of Christiansen, Jacknin & Myers, Palm Beach, for appellant/petitioner.
    Fred H. Gelston of Tucker & Slawson, P. A., West Palm Beach, for appellee/respon-dent.
   PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence for criminal contempt. Upon review of the record we are of the view that the appellant was entitled to the procedural due process rights provided in Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.840 and that the trial court erred in entering judgment and sentence without first following the procedures set out therein. See Pugliese v. Pugliese, 347 So.2d 422 (Fla. 197); Buzkar v. Buzkar, 368 So.2d 430 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Vines v. Vines, 357 So.2d 243 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). Accordingly, this cause is hereby reversed and remanded for further proceedings in accord herewith.

ANSTEAD, MOORE and BERANEK, JJ., concur.