Case ID: a2d_536/html/1084-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. Statement of BELSON, Associate Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HOWREY & SIMON, et al„ Petitioners, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, Respondent, and Edith R. Foster, Intervenor.
    No. 85-1030.
    District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
    Jan. 27, 1988.
    Before PRYOR, Chief Judge, and MACK, NEWMAN, FERREN, BELSON, TERRY, ROGERS, and STEADMAN, Associate Judges.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the stipulation dismissing the petition for rehearing en banc and request for remand, it is

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc is hereby dismissed.

Statement of BELSON, Associate Judge,

with whom TERRY, Associate Judge, joins:

The parties to this appeal have entered into a settlement and for that reason have agreed that Howrey & Simon’s pending petition for rehearing en banc should be dismissed. While settlement is always to be encouraged, this particular settlement at this procedural juncture deprives the en banc court of the opportunity to decide whether it should pass upon the important issue of actual notice of work-related injury that was discussed in the majority opinion and the dissent issued by the division. By entering into a settlement, the parties have halted the appellate process before the full court determined whether it would hear the matter, leaving in place a division opinion which will remain binding unless it is overruled by the full court in a future case. M.A.P. v. Ryan, 285 A.2d 310, 312 (D.C.1971).