Case ID: ny_150/html/0575-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Martin D. Chace, Respondent, v. Warsaw Water Works Company, Appellant.
    (Argued October 8, 1896;
    decided October 27, 1896.)
    
      Chace v. Warsaw W. W. Co., 79 Hun, lot, affirmed.
    Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered June 28, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee, but suspended for six months the operation of an injunction granted.
    
      Eugene M. Bartlett for appellant.
    
      Charles B. Newton for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs, but the operation of the injunction is suspended for six months, on the opinion of Bradley, J., below.

All concur, except Haight, J., not sitting.