Case ID: so2d_645/html/1128-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FAMOUS AMOS and Alexsis Risk Management, Appellants, v. Daniel WEIL, Appellee.
    No. 93-3501.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Dec. 15, 1994.
    William J. Spradley, III, of Osborne, McNatt, Shaw, O’Hara, Brown & Obringer, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellants.
    James W. Radloff of Hardesty, Tyde & Radloff, Jacksonville, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from the judge of compensation claims’ (JCC) order finding compensability and awarding benefits to appellee Weil. We REVERSE and REMAND with instructions that the JCC address and adjudicate appellants’ Martin v. Carpenter defense. Buckhalter v. University of Florida, 411 So.2d 1327 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 418 So.2d 1278 (Fla.1982); Westberry v. Copeland Sausage Co., 389 So.2d 1214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Dunn Lumber & Supply Co. v. Roy, 382 So.2d 51 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert, denied, 389 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 1980). We AFFIRM without discussion all other issues on appeal not involving appellants’ Martin v. Carpenter defense.

BOOTH, WOLF and MICKLE, JJ., concur. 
      
      . Martin v. Carpenter, 132 So.2d 400 (Fla.1961).