Case ID: f2d_354/html/0241-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Morris WEISFELD, d/b/a M & W Fruit Company, Appellant, v. ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
    No. 22278.
    United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
    Jan. 5, 1966.
    Billy B. Goldberg, Houston, Tex., for appellant.
    Newton Gresham, Houston, Tex., Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates & Jaworski, Houston, Tex., for appellee.
    Before JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and DYER, District Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

The district court’s opinion sets forth the facts from which the controversy presented by this appeal have arisen. Weisfeld v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, 236 F.Supp. 496. In its opinion, the district court expresses its view of the controlling principle of law. We are in agreement with the result reached by the district court and its judgment is

Affirmed.