Case ID: njl_61/html/0289-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE ESSEX COUNTY ELECTRIC COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. ANDREW KELLY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Supreme Court, see 31 Vroom 306.
    For the plaintiff in error, E. A. & W. T. Day.
    
    For the defendant in error, Samuel Kalisoh.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Collins, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Ludlow, Adams, Bogert, Hendrickson, Krueger, Nixon, Vredenburgh. 13.

For reversal—None. ■