Case ID: nys_1/html/0565-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dykitan, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Townsend v. Minford.
    
      (Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.
    
    May 14, 1888.)
    Frauds, Statute of—Agreement not to be Performed within a Tear.
    A contract made in February, pursuant to which plaintiff and his wife were to work for the defendant for one year from April 1st, is a contract not to be performed within one year; and, if not reduced to writing, is void under the statute of frauds.
    Appeal from special term, Dutchess county; J. F. Barnard, Justice.
    Action for damages by George W. Townsend against Thomas Minford, tried, by cónsent, without a jury. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant.
    
      J. W. Bartrum, for appellant. C. 8. Simpkins, for respondent.
   Dykitan, J.

This is an action to recover the damages sustained by the plaintiff by reason of his discharge by the defendant from his service. It was proved upon the trial, and found by the trial judge, that the plaintiff and defendant made an agreement in February, 1884, by which the plaintiff and his wife were to work for the defendant one year from the 1st day of April, 1884. The agreement was not reduced to writing, and the plaintiff and his wife were discharged in December, 1884, after working from the 1st day of April under the contract. The complaint was dismissed on the trial because the contract was void under the statute of frauds. The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment, but the case seems very plain, and .the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.