Case ID: f-appx_473/html/0346-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Andrea PARRIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BALTIMORE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 11-1891.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 25, 2012.
    Decided: June 4, 2012.
    David A. Branch, Law Office of David A. Branch & Associates, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Leslie R. Stellman, Lisa Y. Settles, Hodes, Pessin & Katz, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Andrea Parris appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in part and the court’s final order granting Defendant’s renewed motion for summary judgment in Parris’ civil action alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Parris v. Baltimore Cnty. Bd. of Educ., No. 1:09-cv-00704-BEL (D. Md. entered Dec. 8, 2010 & July 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.