Case ID: f-appx_186/html/0005-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael R. ATRAQCHI and Irene S. Atraqchi, Appellants v. UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF the FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, et al., Appellees.
    No. 06-5021.
    United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
    June 27, 2006.
    Michael R. Atraqchi, Washington, DC, pro se.
    Irene S. Atraqchi, Washington, DC, pro se.
    Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and BROWN, Circuit Judges.
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellants. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed January 13, 2006, be affirmed. The complaint contains factual allegations that are so implausible as to be “fantastic or delusional.” Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327-28, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989). Accordingly, the district court properly dismissed the ease as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.