Case ID: sw3d_87/html/0888-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Scott BARMORE, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 80201.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Oct. 15, 2002.
    Lawrence L. Pratt, Assistant Public Defenders Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    
      Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Joel A. Block, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Scott Barmore (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty as a prior and persistent offender of first-degree robbery. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s ruling on Appellant’s motion to suppress was supported by substantial evidence. State v. Davis, 32 S.W.3d 603, 610 (Mo.App. E.D.2000). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).