Case ID: f-appx_265/html/0623-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victorino SANDOVAL-SEPULVEDA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-30143.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted Jan. 14, 2008 .
    Filed Jan. 28, 2008.
    Joshua A. Van De Wetering, Esq., USMI—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Missoula, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Monte L. Jewell, Esq., Missoula, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: HALL, O’SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Victorino Sandoval-Sepulveda appeals from the 6-month sentence imposed following revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for reasonableness, United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1176 & n. 5 (9th Cir.2006), and we affirm.

Sandoval-Sepulveda contends that the district court’s application of U.S.S.G § 7B1.3(f) resulted in an unreasonable sentence. We disagree, and conclude that the district court neither abused its discretion in considering the Chapter 7 policy statement, nor imposed an unreasonable sentence.

See Miqbel, 444 F.3d at 1176 & n. 5.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.