Case ID: or-app_238/html/0752-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Submitted October 11,
    reversed and remanded November 17, 2010
    In the Matter of H. E., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, v. A. E., Appellant.
    
    Lane County Circuit Court
    09192J;
    Petition Number 09192J01;
    A145662
    243 P3d 138
    James A. Palmer filed the brief for appellant.
    John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Greg Rios, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
    Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Mother appeals a permanency judgment changing the case plan from reunification to adoption. She argues, among other contentions, that the juvenile court erred in failing to make and include in the judgment the statutorily required findings. ORS 419B.449(2); ORS 419B.476(2), (5). The state concedes that the judgment is deficient and should be remanded in order for the juvenile court to include the required findings and determinations. See State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. J .F. B., 230 Or App 106, 115, 214 P3d 827 (2009) (remanding for juvenile court to enter judgments that comply with ORS 419B.476). We agree with and accept the state’s concession. Given our remand, we do not reach the other issues mother raises on appeal. See id. at 118 (“The other issues raised by mother on appeal are premature at this time.”).

Reversed and remanded.