Case ID: ny-2d_33/html/0897-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Eugene Kealey, Appellant.
    Submitted December 10, 1973;
    decided December 27, 1973.
   Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following; Upon appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon the following question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Defendant-appellant argued that he had been denied due process of law because the statute under which he was convicted (Penal Law, § 125.10) is unconstitutionally vague. The Court of Appeals held that appellant’s constitutional rights were not violated. [See 33 N Y 2d 818.]