Case ID: blackf_7/html/0307-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dewet, J. \n      Per Curiam,.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State v. Newer.
    
      Saturday, December 7.
    
    A plea in abatement to an indictment, that the grand juror# who found the indictment, were selected by the board of commissioners on the 6th of May, 1841, and that they had no authority to make the selectiofl on that day, is bad for not showing, that said 6th of May was not included in the May session of the board in that year.
    ERROR to the Fountain Circuit Court.
   Dewet, J.

— This was a prosecution against a licensed grocery keeper for selling spirituous liquor to an intoxicated person. The indictment was found at the September term, 1841, of the Fountain Circuit Court. The defendant pleaded in abatement, that the grand jurors, who found the indictment, were selected by the board of commissioners of Fountain county on the sixth day of May, 1841; and that they were not authorized by law to make such selection, or do any other county business, on that day. Demurrer to the plea overruled, and the indictment quashed.

S. C. Willson, for the state.

By the law in force when the grand jurors in question were selected, the board doing county business in each county, was required to select grand and petit jurors at'the May session, which was to be held on the first Monday of that month, and might continue for five days. R. S. 1838, pp. 358, 151. No statute, exempting the county of Fountain from the operation of this general provision, has been pointed out to us ; and we know of none. The plea does not show that the 6th of May, the day on which the grand jurors were selected, was not included in the May term” of the board of commissioners, and is, therefore, bad. The general allegation, that the commissioners had no authority to make the selection on that day, is too vague for a plea in abatement. The board was authorized to select the grand jurors at the May session, which might, for aught that appeal’s, have embraced the day on which the selection was made. The demurrer should have been sustained.

Per Curiam,.

— The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.