Case ID: ohio-st_61/html/0634-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Felch, Assignee v. The Hodgman Mfg. Co. et al.
    Reporter’s Note.
    In printing the syllabus in this case, as reported at page 93 of this volume, there was omitted, by some oversight not now understood, after the word “exceptions” this clause: “and the journal entry made on the 48th day after the overruling shows only that on this day comes the plaintiff and presents his bill of exceptions, which upon examination is found to be true and correct and is by the court hereby allowed, signed, sealed and ordered to be made a part of the record.”
    The omission is of minor importance, however, inasmuch as the matter was subsequently reconsidered, and the order sustaining the motion set aside and the motion overruled. A full report of the final disposition of the motion will be found in volume 62 of these reports.
   Motion by defendant to strike bill of exceptions from the files in cause No. 6778 on the general docket.