Case ID: okla_31/html/0109-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WILLIAMS, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SCOTT v. JACOBS.
    No. 704.
    Opinion Filed March 21, 1911.
    Rehearing Denied December 5, 1911.
    1. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — Statehood—Territorial Laws — Existing Eights. By section 1 of the Schedule to the Constitution, all laws in force in the Indian Territory at the time of the erection of the state, as to existing rights, were continued in force as if no change had taken place in the form of government.
    2. INDIANS — Estates of Decedents — Judicial Notice of Laws and Customs. The laws of descent and distribution of the Creek Nation, having been made to apply as to the distributive share of certain allotted lands and funds of said tribe by section 28 of the act of Congress of March 1, 1901 (31 U. S. St. 861; Bled-soe’s Indian Land Laws, 125), the courts of this state take judicial knowledge of such laws land customs of the Creek Nation.
    (Syllabus by the Court.)
    
      Error from District Court, Hughes County; John Caruthers, Judge.
    
    Action between Agnes Scott and John A. Jacobs. From the judgment Scott brings error.
    Affirmed.
    
      Lewis C. Lawson, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Crump, Rogers & Harris, for defendant in error.
   WILLIAMS, J.

It is insisted by the plaintiff in error that, from the facts as stated in the petition, the land herein involved descended to the heirs according to the laws of descent and dis-tribntion of the Creek Tribes of Indians. (Act Cong. June 28, 1898, 30 U. S. Stat. 495; Bledsoe’s Ind. Land Laws, 125), and, as said laws were not pleaded, the lower court did not take judicial knowledge of same, and for that reason the petition did not state a cause of action. In Bruner et al. v. Sanders et al. 26 Okla. 673, 110 Pac. 733, it was held that the district court of Hughes county did not take judicial notice of the laws and customs of the Seminole Tribe of Indians. In that case the laws and customs of the Seminole Tribe were not made to apply by virtue of an act of Congress. In the case at bar the laws of descent and distribution of the Creek Tribe are made to apply by act of Congress. By section 1 of the Schedule of the Constitution, all laws in force in the territory of the Indian Territory, as to existing rights, were specifically continued as if no change had taken place in the form of government. . Ex parte Curlee, 20 Okla. 192, 95 Pac. 414; Ex parte Buchanan, 20 Okla. 831, 94 Pac. 943. As to such' laws, the courts of this state take judicial knowledge.

It seems to be conceded by the plaintiff in error that if the lower court took judicial knowledge of the laws of descent and distribution of the Creek Nation, no reversible error appears in this record.

The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

All the Justices concur.