Case ID: cust-ct_4/html/0486-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 43736.
    Protests 663708-G, etc., of Louis Wolf & Co. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel uninflated rubber balls the same as those passed upon in United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1502. Uninflated animal characters in chief value of india rubber like those the subject of Abstract 41517 were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1537.