Case ID: njl_100/html/0186-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. DANIEL J. KELLY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued March 5, 1924
    Decided April 17, 1924.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 1 N. J. Mis. B. 507.
    For the plaintiff in error, Mott <& Bernheim.
    
    For the defendant in error, John 0. Bigelow, prosecutor of the pleas..
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, 'Clark, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.