Case ID: misc_12/html/0198-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "McCarthy, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Abraham Newkirk, Respondent, v. Walter H. Hooker et al., Appellants.
    (City Court of New York
    —General Term,
    April, 1895.)
    By moving on the original papers to vacate an attachment the defendant concedes all that is stated in the affidavits and their legal intendment.
    An application for an attachment in the City Court of New York is governed hy section 3169 of the Code, and not hy section 636.
    Appeal from order denying motion to set aside an attachment.
    
      Johnson do Dowd, for appellants.
    
      Abraham Kling, for respondent.
   McCarthy, J.

The defendant, by movmg on the original ’ papers to vacate the attachment, concedes all that is stated in the affidavits and their legal intendment.

Section 636, Code of Civil Procedure, does not apply to this court (See § 3160, Code Civ. Proc.), but section 3169 does.

We think the affidavits, although not as full as they might be, are sufficient to sustain this attachment.

Order is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

Ehrlich, Ch. J., and Van Wyck, J., concur.

Order affirmed, with costs.