Case ID: so2d_356/html/0058-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DAUKSCH, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carmine MARTUCCI, Appellant, v. Ames BENNETT, Aia, Richard Garfield, Bliss & Nyitray, Inc., etc., and Moseley Collins, et al., Appellees. Carmine MARTUCCI, Appellant, v. BLISS & NYITRAY, INC., etc., Richard Garfield, et al., Appellees. Carmine MARTUCCI, Appellant, v. Moseley COLLINS and Richard Garfield, et al., Appellees.
    Nos. 77-57, 77-88 and 77-89.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    March 14, 1978.
    Larry Klein, West Palm Beach, for appellant. '
    Gregory B. Dickenson, of Warwick, Campbell, Dickenson & Hewitt, Palm Beach, for appellee Moseley Collins.
    Richard A. Henry, Palm Beach, for appel-lee Ames Bennett.
   DAUKSCH, Judge.

This case comes to us after a summary final judgment was entered for Appellees against Appellant. There are material issues of fact raised within the pleadings and the depositions which cannot be resolved by summary judgment at this point. For example, there is a question of the authority of an alleged agent to bind the Appellant as a principal and there is a question as to whether the claims of lien were filed on time. These issues and any others which may become apparent must be resolved before a final judgment can be rendered. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and CROSS, J., concur.