Case ID: ny-st-rep_70/html/0896-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "McCarthy, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jerome P. Uptegrove et al., Respt’s, v. Central R. Co. of New Jersey, App’lt.
    N. Y. C. C.,
    November 26, 1895.
    
      JDeForest Bros., for app’lt; M. P. O’Oonnor, for resp’ts.
   McCarthy, J.

—Both sides, having moved for a direction of a verdict, left the questions of law and fact to the trial justice to determine. We have examined the facts very carefully, and, under Park v. Preston, 108 N. Y. 434, 437; 15 N. E. 705, think the judgment should be affirmed, and it is so ordered, with costs. See Jennings v. Railroad Co., 127 N. Y. 449; 28 N. E. 394.