Case ID: ga_211/html/0525-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Duckworth, Chief Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

18891.
    Dell et al. v. Suggs.
   Duckworth, Chief Justice.

Since the amended petition, seeking to recover an alleged partner’s share of profits realized by a partnership of which he was a member in the operation of a real-estate brokerage business, alleges that the partnership was duly licensed, which means a license in complete conformity with Code § 84-1415, thus completely rebutting any contention that the petitioner unlawfully operated and hence can not recover, a cause of action is alleged, and the court did not err in overruling the general demurrer.

Argued February 16, 1955

Decided April 1, 1955.

Johnson, Hatcher & Meyerson, Henry M. Hatcher, Jr., for plaintiffs in error.

Noah J. Stone, Joseph J. Fine, F. H. Boney, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.