Case ID: so2d_479/html/0105-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE FLORIDA BAR, RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE INTEGRATION RULE OF THE FLORIDA BAR, ARTICLE II AND ARTICLE VIII, AND THE INTEGRATION RULE BYLAWS, ARTICLE II AND ARTICLE VIII.
    No. 61736.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Nov. 14, 1985.
    Patrick G. Emmanuel, President, Pensacola, Joseph J. Reiter, President-elect, West Palm Beach, Phyllis Shampanier, Chairman, Integration Rule & Bylaws Committee, Miami Beach, Thomas M. Ervin, Jr., Chairman, Disciplinary Procedure Committee, Tallahassee, and John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, for The Florida Bar, petitioner.
   PER CURIAM.

It appears to the Court that the amendments to The Integration Rule of The Florida Bar proposed in the amended petition in this proceeding should be reconsidered in conjunction with the more comprehensive revisions subsequently proposed in separate proceedings. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed and remanded to the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar for further consideration.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, McDonald, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.