Case ID: nj-eq_109/html/0131-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George S. Lings, appellant, v. Ethel L. Urquhart, individually, &c., respondent.
    [Decided October 19th, 1931.]
    
      Messrs. Melosh,, Morten <& Melosh, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Edwin G. Adams, for the respondent.
   Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in 106 N. J. Eq. 506.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.