Case ID: nj_3/html/0004-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ARTESIAN WELL AND EQUIPMENT CO., INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ARCHITECTURAL TILING CO., INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Argued October 10, 1949
    Decided October 17, 1949.
    
      Mr. William S. Grimaldi argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Raymond G. Becker, attorney).
    
      Mr. Ilenry Pomerehne argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Brody ,& Brody, attorneys).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge McGeehan in the court below. '

For affirmance—Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Case, Hehee, Oliphant, Waciieneeld, Bueling and Ackeeson—7.

For reversal—Hone.