Case ID: wis_224/html/0236-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Neyers, Respondent, vs. Seelow, Defendant: Sampson-O’Connell, Inc., Appellant.
    
      February 10
    
    March 9, 1937.
    
    For the appellant there was a brief by Crawford & Crawford of Superior, and oral argument by Raymond A. Crawford.
    
    For the respondent there was a brief by Cadigan & Cadi-gan, John C. Fritschler, and John H. Chisholm, all of Superior, and oral argument by Mr. Fritschler.
    
   Per Curiam.

The case is ruled by the decision in Anderson v. Seelow, ante, p. 230, 271 N. W. 844. The judgment of the superior court is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion in that case.