Case ID: nj_54/html/0151-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CARDELL, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND J. RICHARD HUDANICH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF MADISON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IN THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND MANZO CONTRACTING CO., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
    Argued June 4, 1969
    Decided June 6, 1969.
    
      
      Mr. Stewart M. Mutt argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Mutt and Berkow, attorneys).
    
      Mr. Marc J. Gordan and Mr. Mark L. Stanton argued the cause for respondents.
   Pee Cueiam.

The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Labrecque in the Appellate Division.

For reversal — Chief Justice Weinteaub and Justices Jacobs, Feanois, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and HaneMAN-7.

For affirmance — None.