Case ID: misc_20/html/0716-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Julius Jacob, Respondent, v. The E. V. Cranfall Co., Appellant.
    . Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict.
    Herman Herst, for appellant.
    William King Hall, .for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The sole question in dispute herein is: Did the-plaintiff perform the duties required from him by virtue- of his contract with the defendant? That question of fact, in our opinion, was properly submitted, to the jury and the evidence fully justifies their finding in plaintiff’s favor and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed, with costs. :

Present: Yaw Wyck, Ch. J,., McCarthy and Eitzsimows, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.