Case ID: nys_88/html/1096-11.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DOLL, Respondent, v. SMITH et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    June 10, 1904.)
    Action by Edwin N. Doll against Albert D. Proctor Smith and Carlton R. Mabley.
   PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with costs, on the ground that it is not made to appear that the examination is material or necessary before the trial, rather than after the trial.