Case ID: f-appx_586/html/0579-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leroy CHISHOLM, a.k.a. Fats, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 14-11001
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Dec. 4, 2014.
    R. Brian Tanner, James D. Durham, E. Gregory Gilluly, Jr., Tania D. Groover, Karl I. Knoche, Brian T. Rafferty, Edward J. Tarver, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Savannah, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Mark A. Hendrix, Harvey & Hendrix, PC, Richmond Hill, GA, Leroy Chisholm, FCI Tallahassee, Tallahassee, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    
      Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Mark Hendrix, appointed counsel for Leroy Chisholm in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of-merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Chisholm’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.