Case ID: nev_93/html/0552-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JUANITA HARMON, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
    No. 9945
    November 16, 1977
    571 P.2d 108
    
      Morgan D. Harris, Public Defender, and Kirk B. Lenhard, Deputy Public Defender, Clark County, for Appellant.
    
      Robert List, Attorney General, Carson City; George E. Holt, District Attorney, and H. Leon Simon, Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.
   OPINION

Per Curiam:

Convicted by jury verdict of robbery (NRS 200.380), Juanita Harmon claims there is insufficient evidence to support the verdict. We disagree.

The record indicates, inter alia, that (1) Harmon was identified by the victim as the perpetrator of the robbery, and (2) in statements to police officers, Harmon indicated she had committed the crime. In light of these facts, we conclude there is substantial evidence to support the verdict and, thus, it will not be disturbed on appeal. Watkins v. State, 93 Nev. 100, 560 P.2d 921 (1977); Nix v. State, 91 Nev. 613, 541 P.2d 1 (19751, and cases cited therein.

Affirmed.