Case ID: ohio-st-3d_63/html/0739-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State, ex rel. Albright, Appellee, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio; Matlack, Inc., Appellant.
    [Cite as State, ex rel. Albright, v. Indus. Comm. (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 739.]
    (No. 90-2522
    Submitted February 11, 1992
    Decided June 3, 1992.)
    
      Gallon, Kalniz &. lorio Co., L.P.A., and Theodore A. Bowman, for appellee.
    
      
      Schottenstein, Zox & Dunn Co., L.P.A., Robert D. Weisman and Corey V. Crognale, for appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The court of appeals correctly found that the commission’s boilerplate recitation of nonmedical disability factors was insufficient. See State, ex rel. Noll, v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.