Case ID: njl_100/html/0406-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

C. EDWARD MYERS COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. THE TOWN OF BOONTON, APPELLANT.
    Submitted June 6, 1924
    Decided October 20, 1924.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court.
    For the appellant, S. G. Garrison.
    
    For the respondent, Philip Goodell.
    
   Per Curiam.

Neither after consideration of the facts, nor of the law involved in this case, are we disposed to disturb the judgment appealed from; for, as was sagely remarked by Lord Coke, "ubi eadem ratio ibi idem jus.” Co. Litt. 10a; Ippollilo v. Ridgefield, 94 N. J. L. 97; Headley v. Cavelier, 82 N. J. L. 637; Jersey City Supply Co. v. Jersey City 71 Id. 631; Ocean Gily v. Shriver, 64 Id. 550.

The judgment will therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 16

For reversal — None.