Case ID: f-appx_120/html/0411-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Mark RODRIGUEZ, Ramon Luis Martinez, Jamie Coburn, Defendants, Miguel Martinez, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-1643.
    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    Feb. 10, 2005.
    Tina Schneider, Portland, ME, for Appellant.
    John-Claude Charbonneau, Assistant United States Attorney (David V. Kirby, Acting United States Attorney for the District of Vermont, on the brief), United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Vermont, Rutland, VT, for Appellee.
    Present: KEARSE, CABRANES and SACK, Circuit Judges.
   SUMMARY ORDER

Following the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), this Court has issued an opinion in United States v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103, No. 03-1675, 2005 WL 240916, 2005 U.S.App. LEXIS 1699 (2d Cir. Feb. 2, 2005), setting forth the procedure that we will normally follow with respect to appeals of criminal sentences rendered by district courts prior to Booker. Appellant is directed to submit to the Clerk of this Court by 5 p.m. on Monday, February 14, 2005, a one-page statement indicating whether appellant seeks a remand for consideration of whether resentencing should occur in light of Booker and Crosby.