Case ID: f-appx_296/html/0594-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Etta M. COLLIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; et al., Defendants — Appellees.
    No. 08-55714.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 6, 2008.
    
    Filed Oct. 15, 2008.
    Etta M. Collier, Carson, CA, pro se.
    Russell W. Chittenden, USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Timothy J. Krai, Manning & Marder, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: WARDLAW, W. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

A review of the record and the response to the order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.