Case ID: f-appx_714/html/0291-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Brett KIMBERLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patrick FREY, Defendant-Appellee, and National Bloggers Club; Ali Akbar; Erick Erickson; Michelle Malkin; Glenn Beck; Aaron Walker; William Hoge; Lee Stranahan; Robert Stacy Mccain; James O’Keefe; Mandy Nagy; Breitbart.com; The Franklin Center; Simon and Schuster, Inc.; Lynn Thomas, a/k/a Kimberlinunmasked; Mercury Radio Arts; The Blaze; Ace of Spades; Redstate; Db Capital Strategies; Dan Backer; Twitchy; American Spectator, Defendants.
    No. 17-1970
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: February 27, 2018
    Decided: March 14, 2018
    Brett C. Kimberlin, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald David Coleman, MANDELBAUM SALSBURG, Roseland, New Jersey, for Appellee.
    ■Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brett C. Kimberlin appeals the district court’s order granting Appellee summary judgment on Kimberlin’s First Amendment retaliation claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find mo reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kimberlin v. Frey, No. 8:13-cv-03059-GJH, 2017 WL 3141909 (D. Md. filed July 21, 2017; entered July 24, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED