Case ID: f-appx_234/html/0534-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edward G. STINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALAMEDA COUNTY; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 07-15135.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 4, 2007.
    
    Filed June 12, 2007.
    Edward G. Stinson, Oakland, CA, pro se.
    Before: LEAVY, RYMER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

To date, appellant has not responded to this court’s April 9, 2007 order directing him to show cause, within 21 days, why summary affirmance of this appeal would not be appropriate. A review of the record and appellant’s brief filed February 28, 2007, indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.