Case ID: a3d_167/html/0700-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel KING, Petitioner v. RIVERWATCH CONDOMINIUM OWNER’S ASSOCIATION, Respondent
    No. 739 MAL 2016
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    February 28, 2017
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

The Application for Relief Pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 123, filed by Riverwatch Condominium Owners Association, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See King v. Delaware County Court of Common Pleas Judge, 2 MM 2017 (order dated February 28, 2017) (issuing a rule on Petitioners “to show cause why they should not be barred from submitting any further filings in this Court relative to the civil action involving Riverwatch Condominium Owners Association, including any related orders concerning the awards of costs, as well as directives barring Thomas P. Gan-non, Esquire, from representing Daniel King.”).