Case ID: f2d_949/html/0378-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VIDEO MONITORING SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 90-8798.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Dec. 3, 1991.
    Christopher P. Bussert, Jerre B. Swann, Kilpatrick & Cody, Atlanta, Ga., Daniel J. Goldstein, Bruce P. Keller, Debevoise & Plimpton, New York City, for defendant-appellant.
    David Nimmer, Kenneth A. Liebman, Robert Aldisert, Irell & Manella, Los Ange-les, Cal., June Ann Sanders, William N. Withrow, Jr., Troutmen, Sanders, Locker-man & Ashmore, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.
    Francis D. Landrey, Charles S. Sims, Jon A. Baumgarten, Carole E. Handler, Pros-kauer, Rose, Goetz & Mendelsohn, New York City, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, Cal., for amicus.
    Peter C. Canfield, Dow, Lohnes & Albert-son, Atlanta, Ga., Sheila F. Anthony, Diane M. Morse, Arnold P. Lutzker, Dow, Lohnes & Albertson, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae A.H. Belo Corp.
   ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.