Case ID: sw3d_110/html/0842-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jerry BRANDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 80868.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    June 10, 2003.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 24, 2003.
    Daniel L. Mohs, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Andrea Mazza Follett, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, • C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J. and ROBERT E. CRIST, SR. J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jerry Brandon (“Movant”) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would be of no prece-dential value. We affirm the judgment for the reasons set forth in the motion court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b).