Case ID: so2d_564/html/0538-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Samuel SHERADSKY, Appellant, v. WALSH, THEISSEN & BOYD, P.A., Appellee.
    No. 89-0816.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    July 5, 1990.
    Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Aug. 23, 1990.
    Samuel Sheradsky of Samuel Sheradsky, P.A., Coral Gables, pro se.
    Matthew T. Jones of Walsh, Theissen & Bóyd, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment dividing and awarding attorney’s fees. However, we agree with appellant that he is entitled to prejudgment interest on the portion of his fee that was in dispute and remand for calculation of interest and its addition to the final judgment.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

LETTS, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.