Case ID: nj-eq_38/html/0653-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Henry H. Voorhis et al., appellants, v. Minna De Kay et al., respondents.
    
      Mr. Charles H. Voorhis, for appellants.
    
      Mr. John Linn, for respondents.
    On appeal from a part of the decree of the chancellor (not disposed of by the appeal reported in Hackensack Water Co. v. De Kay, 9 Stew. Eq. 548), whose opinion is reported in De Kay v. Voorhis, 9 Stew. Eq. 37.
    
   Per Curiam.

This decree affirmed for the reasons given by the chancellor.

For affirmance — Chief-Justice, Depue, Knapp, Magie, Parker, Reed, Scudder, Van Syckel, Brown, Paterson, Whitaker — 11.

For reversal — Dixon—1.