Case ID: cust-ct_58/html/0868-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Ford, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BEFORE THE SECOND DIVISION,
    February 27, 1967
    No. P67/48.
    No. P67/49.
    No. P67/50.
    No. P67/51.
    No. P67/52.
    The Durst Manufacturing Co., Inc., et al. v. United States,
    protests 322461-K, etc. (New York).
    Globe Importing Company v. United States,
    protests 324444-K, etc. (New York).
    Globe Importing Company v. United States,
    protests 58/22050, etc. (New York).
    The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc., et al. v. United States,
    protests 59/30307, etc. (New York).
    Globe Importing Company v. United States,
    protests 61/16211, etc. (New York).
   Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of strainers in chief value of brass similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies Turner & Company v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.