Case ID: nj-eq_82/html/0661-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David Potter, trustee, &c., appellant, v. Mary Alice Nixon, administratrix, et al., respondents.
    [Submitted December 6th, 1913.
    Decided March 16th, 1914.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning, whose opinion is reported in 81 N. J. Eq. (11 Buck,.) 888.
    
    
      Messrs. Hampton & Fithian, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Walter H. Bacon, for Mary Alice Nixon, administratrix, respondent.
    
      Mr. John B. B. Nixon, for Mary Nixon Everett, executrix, &c., respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Congdon, White, Heppenheimer—13.

For reversal—None.