Case ID: f-appx_122/html/0055-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Maurice Anthony KING, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 04-8020.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 9, 2005.
    Decided: Feb. 17, 2005.
    
      Maurice Anthony King, Appellant pro se.
    Olivia N. Hawkins, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Maurice A. King appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for production of transcripts at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. King, No. CR-02-402 (E.D.Va. Dec. 2, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED