Case ID: sw2d_962/html/0944-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David FELLING and Dennis Fitzwilliam, Appellants, v. Larry GILES, Respondent.
    No. 72060.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Feb. 24, 1998.
    Gary Siegel, Wittner, Poger, Rosenblum, Spewak, Clayton, for appellant.
    Hugh R. Law, Lowenhaupt, Chasnof, L.L.C., St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, David Felling and Dennis Fitz-william, appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis entered in favor of respondent, Larry Giles, on plaintiffs’ petition insofar as the court held no partnership existed between the parties and further found appellants were not entitled to an accounting. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript and find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. As no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).