Case ID: minn_295/html/0541-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE v. RICHARD O. DUNHAM.
    203 N. W. 2d 406.
    January 12, 1973
    No. 43445.
    
      John J. Scanlan, for appellant.
    
      Warren Spannaus, Attorney General, Lyman A. Brink, County Attorney, and Adlai W. Brink, Assistant County Attorney, for respondent.
    Heard before Knutson, C. J., and Rogosheske, Peterson, and Todd, JJ.
   Per Curiam.

Defendant contends on this appeal from an order of the district court quashing a writ of habeas corpus that the state did not produce enough evidence at the preliminary hearing to establish probable cause for believing him guilty of the offense charged. After a careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not err in quashing the writ.

Affirmed.