Case ID: sw3d_567/html/0695-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael W. HORTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 106466
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: February 13, 2019
    FOR APPELLANT: Alexandria A. Shah, Asst. Public Defender, Missouri State Public Defender Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
    FOR RESPONDENT: Eric Schmitt, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
    Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Michael W. Horton appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).