Case ID: sw3d_292/html/0612-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James E. BENNETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 70115.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Sept. 29, 2009.
    Rugh Sanders, Esq., Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, Esq., and Robert J. Bartholomew, Esq., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before: Division One: ALOK AHUJA, Presiding Judge, JAMES M. SMART and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Judges.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Bennett appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, following an evi-dentiary hearing. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the denial of post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b). AFFIRMED.