Case ID: so2d_185/html/0169-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jack JENNINGS, Petitioner, v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., etc., Respondent. Jack JENNINGS, Petitioner, v. BEEMAN INVESTMENT COMPANY, etc., Respondent.
    No. 34567.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    April 13, 1966.
    Harlan Tuck, of Giles, Hedrick & Robinson, Orlando, for petitioner.
    J. Thomas Gurney, of Gurney, Gurney & Plandley, Orlando, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.