Case ID: la_128/html/0439-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "LAND, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(54 South. 934.)
    No. 18,743.
    STATE ex rel. FLEMING v. JOYCE, Registrar of Voters, et al.
    (April 10, 1911.)
    
      (Syllabus by the Court.)
    
    Elections (§ 98*) — Registration or Voters.
    A person who would become entitled to vote, in respect to age or residence, within 30 days next preceding any election, cannot be excluded from registration for want of such qualifications at the date of his application for registration. Const, art. 213.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Elections, Cent. Dig. § 93; Dec. Dig. § 98.*]
    Appeal from Tenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Concordia; John S. Boatner, Judge.
    Proceeding by rule by the State, on the relation of D. B. Fleming, against John J. Joyce, Registrar of Voters, and T. Milt Wilson, to erase the name of Wilson from the registration list. Judgment for defendant, and relator appeals.
    Affirmed.
    John S. Boatner, Jr., for appellant. Calhoun & Calhoun, for apx>ellee Wilson. John J. Joyce, pro se.
   LAND, J.

This is a proceeding by rule to erase the name of the defendant T. M. Wilson on the registration roll of the precinct of the village of Ferriday, on the ground that he had not during six months been a bona fide resident of said village.

The preponderance of the evidence shows that the defendant has actually resided in Ferriday since the latter part of September, 1910, more than six months before the municipal election to be held in Ferriday on April 18, 1911.

The contention of relator that the registration of the defendant was unlawful, because at the time he had not resided in the precinct /or six months, is repelled by article 213 of the Constitution, which provides for the registration of persons who, in respect to age or residence, would become entitled to vote within 30 days next preceding any election. It follows that as to age and* residence the date of the election, and not the date of the registration, controls.

The judgment below is therefore affirmed.