Case ID: sw2d_860/html/0393-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sylvester HUGGINS, Defendant-Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent.
    No. 63003.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Aug. 31, 1993.
    S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for defendant-movant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.
    Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Sylvester Huggins, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, after an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted, following a jury trial, of three counts of assault in the first degree and sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 30 years, 20 years, and 20 years.

We have reviewed the record with regard to the motion court’s denial of movant’s Rule 29.15 motion. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).