Case ID: nj-eq_97/html/0543-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Helene Salman, respondent, v. Ernest O. Salman, appellant,
    [Decided March 16th, 1925.]
    On appeal from, a decree of the court of chancery, advised by Vice-Chancellor Griffin, whose opinion is reported in 97 N. J. Eq. S3.-
    
    
      Messrs. McXirgan .& Gilson, for the appellant
    
      Messrs. Perkins & Dreivin, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.

For affirmance—The Chibe-Justice, Teen chard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, BAys, JJ. 14.

For reversal—None.