Case ID: so2d_448/html/0068-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alfred Herbert CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 83-1657.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 10, 1984.
    Alfred Herbert Cunningham, in pro per.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s written order revoking the defendant’s probation does not conform to its oral pronouncement finding that the defendant had not violated conditions 6 and 9, and upon remand, these findings should be stricken from the written order. In all other respects, the order revoking probation is affirmed.

Affirmed as modified.