Case ID: pa-commw_20/html/0206-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Judge Rogers,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Charles E. Leib, Appellant.
    Argued June 6, 1975,
    before Judges Wilkinson, Jr., Menceé and Rogers, sitting as a panel of three.
    
      David C. Harrison, for appellant.
    
      Daniel R. Schuckers, Assistant Attorney General, with him Sydney Reuben, Assistant Attorney General, and Robert P. Kane, Attorney General, for appellee.
    
      July 10, 1975:
   Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

The sole question in this case is whether pension benefits paid to the appellant are to be offset against unemployment compensation benefits pursuant to Section 404(d) (iii) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess. P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §804 (d) (iii) (Supp. 1974-1975). We have twice squarely held that they are. Etter v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 12 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 642, 316 A.2d 659 (1974); Ettelson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 12 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 617, 316 A.2d 661 (1974). The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania denied the prayer of a petition for allocatur in Etter and we adhere to our prior determination.

Order

And Now, this 10th day of July, 1975, it is ordered that the instant appeal be and it is dismissed, and the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review be and it is affirmed.