Case ID: so2d_544/html/1075-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anthony J. WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 88-01034.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 9, 1989.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and- Allyn Giambalvo, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Anthony J. Walker appeals his conviction for sexual battery with slight force on the ground that the trial court improperly allowed the state to introduce the statement made to the sexual battery victim during the attack that he had recently been released from prison. After his arrest on the same evening of the crime, appellant also told the arresting police officer that he had just gotten out of prison.

The trial court did not err in allowing the state to introduce testimony on the statement made during the criminal incident because it was part of the integral facts of the case. Additionally, because identity was an issue at trial, the statements made to the victim and the police officer were relevant to prove the identity of the perpetrator. See Ratushinak v. State, 517 So.2d 749 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), review denied, 525 So.2d 880 (Fla.1988) (testimony detailing defendant’s statement to victim and police that he had recently gotten out of jail for an unrelated crime was relevant to issue of identity, which was a material fact, and was admissible).

Affirmed.

RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK and PARKER, JJ., concur.