Case ID: f-appx_196/html/0229-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Shahborn EMMANUEL, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 06-6618.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 24, 2006.
    Decided: Aug. 30, 2006.
    Shahborn Emmanuel, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Shahborn Emmanuel, a federal inmate, appeals district court orders denying his motion for sentencing credit and denying his motion for a transcript. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See United States v. Emmanuel, No. 3:97-cr-00288-ALL (W.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 2006 & filed May 18, 2006; entered May 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED