Case ID: nj-eq_76/html/0337-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stephen L. Tingley, appellant, v. International Dynelectron Company et al., respondents.
    [Argued June 24th, 1909.
    Decided November 15th, 1909.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in If N. J. Ftj. (f Buck.) 588.
    
    
      Mr. Frank F. Bradner, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Flwood <7. Harris, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Emery.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Eeed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dill, Congdon—15!

For reversal—None.