Case ID: ga-app_36/html/0283-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Luke, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

17730.
    Kendrick v. The State.
    Decided January 11, 1927.
    Rehearing denied February 23, 1927.
    Criminal Law, 17 C. J. p. 249, n. 3; p. 255, n. 53.
    Intoxicating Liquors, 33 C. J. p, 580, n. 15; p. 758, n. 83.
   Luke, J.

The defendant’s conviction of knowingly permitting distilling apparatus to be located on his premises was authorized by the evidence; no error of law was committed on the trial; and the motion for a new trial, based on the general grounds only, was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

' Distilling apparatus on premises; from Colquitt superior court— Judge W. E. Thomas. October 25, 1926.

James L. Dowling, for plaintiff in error.

Clifford E. Hay, solicitor-general, contra.