Case ID: so2d_608/html/0550-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mark Anthony CINNANTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-0439.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Nov. 18, 1992.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joseph A. Tringali, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We agree with appellant that, contrary to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830, the judgment of contempt does not include “a recital of those facts upon which the adjudication of guilt,” is based. Although a technical error, it requires a reversal and remand for correction of the judgment. Woods v. State, 600 So.2d 27 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

LETTS, HERSEY and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.