Case ID: ga_125/html/0113-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Rish, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Beacham v. Kennedy.
    Submitted February 23,
    Decided March 24, 1906.
    Action for money had and received. Before Judge Burch. City court of Dublin. April 27, 1905.
    
      P. L. Wade, for plaintiff in error. Williams & Baldwin, contra.
   Rish, C. J.

1. The extract from the charge upon which error is assigned was substantially correct in regard to the matters therein dealt with, and is not erroneous by reason of the fact that other and distinct propositions relating to the same subject were no't embraced.

2. The evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to authorize the verdict, and no sufficient reason appears for reversing the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.