Case ID: ark_205/html/0816-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Griffin Smith, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Phillips v. Quapaw Bath House Company.
    4-7069
    170 S. W. 2d 1001
    Opinion delivered May 10, 1943.
    
      Jay M. Rowland, for appellant.
    ■ Martin, Wootton & Martin, for appellee.
   Griffin Smith, C. J.

The judgment (a jury having-been waived) absolved the Bath House Company of negligence, notwithstanding appellant’s shoulder was slightly cut when she came into contact with a piece of rusty tin — which, as she expressed it, ‘ ‘. . . was sticking out the edge of the door. ’ ’

Tbe court found that although in- different circumstances presence of the tin would have constituted negligence, proof was lacking that it had been in a position to cause danger a sufficient length of time to have been discovered by the defendant in the exercise of ordinary care. We cannot say this holding is not supported by substantial evidence.

Affirmed.