Case ID: sw_184/html/0509-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PRENDERGAST, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WELLS v. STATE.
    (No. 4008.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    March 29, 1916.)
    Cbiminal Daw <&wkey;1090(l) — Statement op Facts and Bill op Exceptions — Necessity.
    In the absence of statement of facts or bill of exceptions, no question is raised for review on appeal in a criminal case.
    [Ed. Note. — For other oases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2653, 2805-2807, 2825-2827, 3204; Dec. Dig. &wkey;1090(l).]
    Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; Robt. B. Seay, Judge.
    Robert Wells was convicted of robbery, and he appeals.
    Judgment affirmed.
    C. C. McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   PRENDERGAST, P. J.

This is an appeal from a conviction of robbery, without a statement of facts or a bill of exceptions. In the absence of these, no question is raised, which can be reviewed.

The judgment is affirmed. 
      <®ss>For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes