Case ID: sw3d_549/html/0539-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Leland M. BEASLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 105753
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: June 26, 2018
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Leland Beasley appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).