Case ID: ark_306/html/0401-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jimmy Lane WICOFF v. STATE of Arkansas
    RC 91-44
    814 S.W.2d 267
    Supreme Court of Arkansas
    Opinion delivered September 9, 1991
    
      Christopher O’Hara Carter, for appellant.
    
      No response.
   Per Curiam.

Appellant, Jimmy Lane Wicoff, by his áttor-

ney, Christopher Carter has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late because the ninety-day limit for filing the record in this Court, see Ark. R. App. P. 5(a), was not extended by a new trial motion with respect to which no record was made. See Ark. R. App. P. 4(c).

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1919, In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.