Case ID: nys_28/html/1150-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "McCARTHY, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MEAD et al., Respondents, v. HARTWELL et al., Appellants.
    (City Court of New York, General Term.
    May 18, 1894.)
    Action by Charles H. Mead and another against H. Edgar Hartwell and others.
    Argued before EHRLICH, C. J., and VAN WYCK and McCARTHY, JJ.
    J. C. & H. C. Smith & Koepke, for appellants.
    Dill & Chandler, for respondents.
   McCARTHY, J.

There is nothing in the objection of the appellants; it is too finely drawn. The summons complies with the order and its intent. The order is therefore affirmed, with costs. All concur.