Case ID: cma_17/html/0150-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES, Petitioner v BOARD OF REVIEW NOS. 2, 1, 4, U. S. Army Judiciary, Respondents
    17 USCMA 150, 37 CMR 414
    Miscellaneous Docket Nos. 67-4, 67-5, 67-6
    July 21, 1967
    
      Captain William R. Steinmetz argued the cause for Petitioner. With him on the brief were Colonel Peter S. Wondolowski, Lieutenant Colonel David Rarick, Major John F. Webb, Jr., and Captain Robert E. Davis.
    
    
      Major Jack G. McKay argued the cause for Respondent.
    
      Lieutenant Colonel Jacob Hagopian argued amicus curiae.
    
   Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam:

This action involves the same controversy as United States v DuBay, et al, 17 USCMA 147, 37 CMR 411, this day decided. The order of the board of review directing certain steps therein is vacated, and the board is instructed to follow the procedures outlined in United States v DuBay, supra.