Case ID: nj-eq_98/html/0692-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bertha Hoffman, respondent, v. Frederick Rauchmiller et al., appellants,
    [Argued May term, 1925,
    Decided October 19th, 1925.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Church, whose opinion is reported in 95 N. J. Eq. 500.
    
    
      Mr. Theodore G. Ilinderlang, for the appellants.
    
      Messrs. LeWbach, Johnson & Ormond, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Church.

■For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, ,TJ. 14.

For reversal — None.