Case ID: minn_240/html/0562-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WILLIAM J. WOODROW v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY., 
    
    December 4, 1953.
    No. 36,277.
    See, 239 Minn. 530, 60 N. W. (2d) 49.
    
      A. C. Erdall, S. W. Rider, Jr., and G. F. Bennett, for appellant.
    
      William A. Tautges, Eugene A. Rerat, and Peterson & Brady, for respondent.
    
      
       Reported in 61 N. W. (2d) 240.
    
    
      
       Certiorari denied, 347 U. S. 935, 74 S. Ct. 630, 98 L. ed. 1085.
    
   Per Curiam.

Appeal from a judgment. The case was here before on appeal from an intermediate order and our opinion filed July 3, 1953. Woodrow v. C. M. St. P. & P. R. Co. 239 Minn. 530, 60 N. W. (2d) 49. For the reasons given in the previous opinion the judgment appealed from is affirmed.