Case ID: fla_107/html/0392-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

W. H. Markham, Appellant, vs. S. C. M. Thomas, as Sheriff of Marion County, Appellee.
    
    144 So. 885.
    Division B.
    Opinion filed December 12, 1932.
    
      Norris F. Baskin and W. E. Smith, for Appellant;
    
      E. H. Martin, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

This Court having held in the companion case to this one (S. C. M. Thomas, as Sheriff, v. Ferdinand Mills, decided at this Term) that the enforcement of Chapter 15328, Acts of 1931, Laws of Florida, prohibiting livestock from running at large in Marion County, was conditioned upon a compliance by the County Commissioners with Section 8 of the Act, the decree in this ease should be reversed on authority of the decision rendered in said companion case, and also on authority of Gill v. Wilder, 95 Fla. 901, 116 Sou. Rep. 870.

This Court holds said Chapter 15328, Acts of 1931, to be constitutional and valid as a special and local law applicable to Marion County, but that it is enforceable as such only after it has been localized in its effect to the territory of Marion County by compliance with Section 8. Compliance with said Section 8 will necessarily relieve the Act from any other constitutional objection such as has been raised in this ease to the effect that to enforce it against cattle owners of Marion County, without enforcing it, or making it effective, against cattle owners of adjoining counties, deprives Marion County cattle owners of the equal protection of the laws.

The decree herein should be reversed but with leave to enter an appropriate decree permitting enforcement of the Act conditioned upon compliance with Section 8 within a reasonable time.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Whitfield, P.J., and Tereell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.