Case ID: so2d_588/html/0995-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Deona EMBRY, Respondent.
    No. 76199.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Nov. 14, 1991.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Stephen A. Baker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for petitioner.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Andrea Norgard, Asst. Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review State v. Embry, 563 So.2d 147 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), which certified the same question answered by this Court in Hunter v. State, 586 So.2d 319 (Fla. 1991). The opinion under review is quashed, and we remand this cause for reconsideration in light of Hunter.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J. and OVERTON, McDonald, barkett, grimes, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.