Case ID: nys_124/html/1134-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WILLOUGHBY, Respondent, v. PATTEN, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    July 29, 1910.)
    Action by Charles G. Willoughby against Dana A. Patten.
   PER CURIAM.

Orders of the County Court of Kings county reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, upon the ground that they are improperly based in part upon conduct during examination subsequent to the motion, that such conduct does not justify the punishment, and that the evidence that the creditor’s rights and remedies were prejudiced does not warrant the fine imposed. See, also, 122 N. Y. Supp. 1150.