Case ID: f-appx_48/html/0089-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jerry L. LINDSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R.C. LEE, Warden; Robert Terry, Jr., Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 02-6994.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 10, 2002.
    Decided Oct. 17, 2002.
    Jerry L. Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Jerry L. Lindsey appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint in which he alleged that he did not receive adequate notice of disciplinary charges prior to a prison disciplinary hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court that no constitutional rights were implicated by the alleged lack of adequate notice. See Lindsey v. Lee, No. CA-02-255-5-H (E.D.N.C. May 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.