Case ID: ad2d_213/html/0416-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eric Barrett, Appellant.
    [624 NYS2d 879]
   —Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.), rendered November 19, 1992, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that it was error for the court to have permitted into evidence the complainant’s out-of-court statements that the defendant raped her is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bacchus, 175 AD2d 248; People v Alston, 163 AD2d 398). In any event, the testimony complained of on appeal was properly admitted as evidence of the complainant’s "prompt outcry” that she had been raped (see generally, People v McDaniel, 81 NY2d 10; People v Rice, 75 NY2d 929). Rosenblatt, J. P., Lawrence, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.