Case ID: so_146/html/0487-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "LE BLANC, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ozeme FRUGE v. D. M. LANGLEY et al.
    No. 1090.
    Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.
    March 7, 1933.
    Guillory & Guillory, of Yille Platte, for appellant.
    S. W. Gardiner, of Ville Platte, and L. A. Pontenot, of Opelousas, for appellees.
   LE BLANC, Judge.

The issue in this ease is the same as that presented in the accompanying case of Buddy Fruge v. Langley (La. App.) 146 So. 486, this day decided.

The plaintiff here is the party who held the mortgage notes bearing on the automobile which was seized, and who it is alleged in the exception referred to in that case intervened in the proceeding in the justice of the peace court. The issue is governed by our decision in the Buddy Pruge Case.

Por the reasons assigned in that ease, it is now ordered adjudged and decreed that the judgment herein sustaining the plea of lis pendens be, and the same is hereby, set aside, avoided, and reversed, and that the case be remanded to the district court for the purpose of having produced before that court and put in the record such evidence as tends to support the plea of lis pendens, or, in default thereof, that the case be proceeded with according to law.

Defendant appellee to pay the costs of this appeal, all other costs to abide the final determination of this suit.