Case ID: f-appx_19/html/0122-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pierre DANIELS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 01-4277.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 20, 2001.
    Decided Sept. 26, 2001.
    Robert B. Rigney, Protogyrou & Rigney, Norfolk, VA, for appellant. Kenneth E. Melson, United States Attorney, Joseph E. DePadilla, Assistant United States Attorney, Thomas Scott Liverman, Third Year Law Student, Norfolk, VA, for appellee.
    Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Following his conviction and sentence for unlawful possession of a weapon by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g) (West 2000), Pierre Daniels appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to suppress evidence of his possession of a firearm. He contends that the officers did not have reasonable suspicion to stop him, and therefore the discovery of the gun was in violation of the Fourth Amendment. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the parties’ briefs and find no reversible error. See United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 9, 109 S.Ct. 1581, 104 L.Ed.2d 1 (1989). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying Daniels’ motion to suppress. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.