Case ID: ny-st-rep_74/html/0371-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Davis v. Bonn.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Dept.,
    Filed March 27, 1896.)
    Motion for reargument or leave to appeal.
    Fromme Bros., for the motion; Manheim & Manheim, opposed.
   PER CURIAM.

The chief ground of the application is that we disposed of the case upon a point not raised in the court below nor discussed in its opinion. It was, however, called to the attention of counsel upon the argument before us, and was suggested by the facts in evidence. The testimony which it is claimed was overlooked would not alter the result. The questions of law involved arise upon facts peculiar to this case, and do not appear to be of general interest, or to affect any other pending or probable litigation.

For these reasons, and those assigned in Hand v. Rogers, 74 St. Rep. 370, and Lynch v. Sauer, 74 id. 369 (opinions filed filed, the motion will be denied, with $10 costs.