Case ID: ny-super-ct_49/html/0532-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Clinton H. Blake, et al., appellants, v. Isidor Rosenthal, et al., respondents; Edmund W. Converse, et al., appellants, v. Isidor Rosenthal, et al., respondents; Henry Lewis, et al., appellants, v. Isidor Rosenthal, et al., respondents.
    Decided December 30, 1882.
    Appeal by the plaintiffs in each <of the above entitled actions from the judgment dismissing the complaint upon the merits.
    Marsh, Wilson & Wallace, for appellants. Richard S. Newcomb, for respondents.
   Opinion by Freedman, J.; Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Russell, J., concur. Judgments appealed from severally affirmed, with costs.