Case ID: ohio-st_170/html/0439-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Terrett v. Court of Appeals of the Seventh Appellate District et al.
    (No. 36306
    Decided March 23, 1960.)
    
      
      Mr. Russell Terrett, in propria persona.
    
    
      Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, and Mr. DeForest Mellon, for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The petition fails to state operative facts which show that relator has no adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. A writ of prohibition will ordinarily not be allowed where there is an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law and may not be a substitute for appeal.

The demurrer to the petition is sustained, and the writ of prohibition is denied.

Demurrer sustained and writ denied.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taut, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.