Case ID: so2d_629/html/1001-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harold D. HOLDER, Sr., and Dur-O-Matic Water Heaters, Inc., Appellants, v. Lawrence M. TALLEY, Appellee.
    No. 93-1640.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 28, 1993.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 28, 1994.
    DuBosar & Davidson and Holly Davidson, Boca Raton, for appellants.
    Robert Ader, Miami, for appellee.
    Before JORGENSON, COPE and LEVY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

In view of the fact that the record reflects a conflict between the note in question and the “second addendum” that purportedly related to the said note, we hold that it was error for the trial court to have granted the summary judgment entered below. Accordingly, the summary judgment is reversed. This reversal is without prejudice to the ap-pellee filing a renewed motion for summary judgment at a future date, such as after the filing of an affidavit by Mrs. Talley disavowing any interest in any note of which the appellant is the maker.

Reversed.