Case ID: ga-app_23/html/0577-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Wade, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

9984.
    Davis v. Davis & Joiner Realty Company.
   Wade, C. J.

1. A “broker’s commissions are earned when, during the agency, he finds a purchaser ready, able, and willing to buy, and who actually offers to buy on the terms stipulated by the owner” (Park’s Ann. Code, § 3587, and note) ; and in view of the testimony of the defendant in this case, that the plaintiff (a broker suing for commission) “told me that Mr. Monerief [the would-be purchaser] was ready to take the property on the terms stated; . . I knew that Mr. Monerief was able to pay for the-property,” which evidence was corroborated by the testimony of the broker and of the would-be purchaser, the verdict in favor of the plaintiff can not be set aside by this court on the general grounds of the motion for a new trial.

Decided April 17, 1919.

Complaint; from city court of Thomasville—Judge W. H. Hammond. July 8, 1918.

Titus, Dekle & Hopkins, for plaintiff in error.

C. E. Hay, contra.

2. None of the special grounds show reversible error, and the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial is

Affirmed.

Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.