Case ID: f-appx_678/html/0462-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles Ray EDWARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
    No. 16-2603
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 2, 2017
    Filed: March 7, 2017
    Charles Ray Edwards, Pro Se
    
      Richard Pence, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR, for Defendant-Appellee
    Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Charles. Edwards appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment in his suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act. After careful review of the record below, the parties’ submissions on appeal, and the issues properly before us, see Peterson v. Kopp, 754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (de novo review of grant of summary judgment), we conclude that'the district court properly granted summary judgment and that Edwards’s arguments for reversal lack merit.

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable Joe J. Volpe, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).