Case ID: njl_92/html/0631-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

S. MARTIN JACOBSEN, RESPONDENT, v. PETER A. PETERSON, APPELLANT.
    Argued November 22, 1918
    Decided November 26, 1918.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 91 N. J. L. 404.
    For the respondent, Leo Goldberg er and S. Martin Jacobsen.
    
    Por the appellant, Peter A. Peterson.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.