Case ID: ad3d_149/html/0554-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Maritza P., as Mother and Guardian Ad Litem of Ismael Daniel M., an Infant, et al., Respondents, v Devereux Foundation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.
    [50 NYS3d 268]
   Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Geoffrey D. Wright, J.), entered on or about December 17, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants-appellants’ (defendants) motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants having satisfied their initial burden on summary judgment, the burden shifted to plaintiffs to raise a triable issue of fact (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). In satisfaction of their burden, plaintiffs offered competent proof in the form of deposition testimony, medical records and police records, which raised triable issues (see generally N.X. v Cabrini Med. Ctr., 97 NY2d 247 [2002]; Kelly G. v Board of Educ. of City of Yonkers, 99 AD3d 756 [2d Dept 2012]).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz, Feinman and Kapnick, JJ.