Case ID: f-appx_332/html/0069-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dalton Dion HOPKINS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-6861.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 10, 2009.
    Decided: Sept. 15, 2009.
    Dalton Dion Hopkins, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dalton Dion Hopkins appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for sentence modification. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Hopkins, No. 3:01-cr-00002-FDW-2 (W.D.N.C. April 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.