Case ID: so2d_878/html/0482-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Interest of D.A.G. and T.G., children. D.Z. and D.P., Appellants, v. Department of Children and Family Services, Appellee.
    No. 2D03-4375.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 30, 2004.
    Eugene L. Beil of Beil & Hay, P.A., Hudson, for Appellants.
    Bernie McCabe, State Attorney, and Andrea Lasker Bradford, Assistant State Attorney, Clearwater, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

D.Z. and D.P. (the Relatives), the maternal great-grandfather and the maternal grandmother, respectively, of D.A.G. and T.G., seek review of the trial court’s nonfi-nal order denying their motion for visitation. We do not have jurisdiction to review this nonfinal order as an interlocutory appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(3). However, we elect to treat the Relatives’ timely filed notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(c). We deny the petition. See Sullivan v. Sapp, 866 So.2d 28 (Fla.2004); A.D. v. KS. (In re S.D.), 869 So.2d 39 (Fla. 2d DCA2004).

Petition denied.

DAVIS, CANADY, and WALLACE, JJ., concur.