Case ID: ny_195/html/0513-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles J. Cummings, Respondent, v. Standard Harrow Company, Appellant.
    
      Cummings v. Standard Harrow Co., 124 App. Div. 915, affirmed.
    (Argued February 26, 1909;
    decided March 16, 1909.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 22, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to recover royalties alleged to be due on a contract licensing the defendant to manufacture and sell certain patented articles.
    
      Richard R. Martin for appellant.
    
      Simon Fleischmann and Fdward C. Hard tor respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward ' T. Bartlett, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Absent r Haight, J.