Case ID: so3d_251/html/0754-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "FAIR, J., FOR THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jerold Wayne SMITH a/k/a Jerold Smith a/k/a Gerald Wayne Smith a/k/a Jerold W. Smith, Appellant v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee
    NO. 2017-CP-00259-COA
    Court of Appeals of Mississippi.
    February 6, 2018 Rehearing Denied May 29, 2018 Writ of Certiorari Denied August 23, 2018
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: JEROLD WAYNE SMITH (PRO SE)
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: BILLY L. GORE
    BEFORE LEE, C.J., FAIR AND GREENLEE, JJ.
   FAIR, J., FOR THE COURT:

¶ 1. In 1986, Jerold Wayne Smith pled guilty to armed robbery. The court sentenced him to fifteen years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections, to be served either concurrently or consecutively with three prior sentences. In 2016, Smith filed a petition for post-conviction relief (PCR), claiming his fifteen-year sentence had expired. The circuit court dismissed the petition, finding it without merit. In addition, "since the only issue that overcomes the time[-]bar is without merit," the court held the petition to be also "untimely filed outside the applicable statute of limitations." Finding no error, we affirm.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

¶ 2. The circuit court may summarily dismiss a PCR motion without an evidentiary hearing "[i]f it plainly appears from the face of the motion, any annexed exhibits and the prior proceedings in the case that the movant is not entitled to any relief." Miss. Code Ann. § 99-39-11(2) (Rev. 2015). To succeed on appeal, the petitioner must: (1) make a substantial showing of the denial of a state or federal right and (2) show that the claim is procedurally alive. Young v. State , 731 So.2d 1120, 1122 (¶ 9) (Miss. 1999).

¶ 3. Our review of the summary dismissal of a PCR motion, a question of law, is de novo. Id.

DISCUSSION

¶ 4. Mississippi Code Annotated section 99-39-5(2) (Rev. 2015) provides that a petitioner who pleads guilty has three years from the judgment of conviction to file his PCR motion unless his claim fits within one of the specified exemptions; subsection 5(2)(b) states that the three-year limit is excepted in "cases in which the petitioner claims that his sentence has expired." Miss. Code Ann. § 99-39-5(2)(b).

¶ 5. Smith claims that his fifteen-year sentence is expired and he should be granted an exception. However, in its sentencing order, the court directed that Smith's fifteen-year sentence be served concurrently with a prior sentence in Jackson County and another prior sentence in Harrison County, but that the sentence in question be served consecutively to a life sentence in Harrison County. Because Smith's fifteen-year sentence is being served consecutively to a prior life sentence, he cannot successfully argue that his sentence is expired. Consequently, his motion is time-barred.

¶ 6. We acknowledge that "[e]rrors affecting fundamental constitutional rights are excepted from the procedural bars of the [Uniform Post-Conviction Collateral Relief Act]." Williams v. State , 158 So.3d 1171, 1173 (¶ 4) (Miss. Ct. App. 2014) (citation omitted). But "mere assertions of constitutional-rights violations do not suffice to overcome the procedural bar." Id. After review of the record, we find Smith's claims are only "mere assertions" and nothing more. Thus, we affirm the circuit court's judgment that Smith's claim is time-barred and without merit.

¶ 7. AFFIRMED.

LEE, C.J., IRVING AND GRIFFIS, P.JJ., BARNES, CARLTON, WILSON, GREENLEE, WESTBROOKS AND TINDELL, JJ., CONCUR.