Case ID: mann-unrep-cas_1/html/0094-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "De Blanc, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 6557.
    Charles De Greck & Co. vs. Murphy & Gairns et al.
    When the transcript does not contain the record of another suit offered in evidence, and no application is made for leave to complete the transcript, in the absence of an agreement on such omission, a motion to dismiss the appeal will be sustained.
    Appeal from the District Court for Tensas. Hough, J.
    
      Leach and B. Lewis for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Labatt, Aroni and Clinton for Defendants.
   De Blanc, J.

In this case a motion is made to dismiss the appeal on the grounds, (1) that the transcript does not contain the record of the succession of Thomas R. Sutton, offered in evidence by the plaintiffs; (2) that the clerk’s certificate is wanting in every legal requisite.

The record referred to in appellee’s motion was not copied in the transcript; the certificate of the clerk is but a list and description of documents, and no application was made to have the transcript completed and the error corrected.

Appeal dismissed.