Case ID: sw3d_146/html/0439-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Scott T. MOTLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 62829.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Oct. 19, 2004.
    Andrew A. Schroeder, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
    Deborah Daniels, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before: ULRICH, P.J., LOWENSTEIN and EDWIN H. SMITH, J.J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-Appellant Scott Motley appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. This court has reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. Finding no reversible error, the court affirms the denial of the post-trial motion. Because a published opinion reciting the facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, this court affirms by this summary order under Rule 84.16.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).