Case ID: mj_73/html/0255-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Wednesday, March 5, 2014
    No. 12-0516/AF.
    U.S. v. Michael S. Tunstall.
   CCA 37592. Review granted on the following issue:

WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (AFC-CA) VIOLATED UNITED STATES v. BUBER, 62 M.J. 476 (C.A.A.F. 2006), WHEN IT ONLY LOOKED AT THE CHANGE IN THE MAXIMUM POSSIBLE PUNISHMENT TO DETERMINE WHETHER THERE WAS A DRAMATIC CHANGE TO THE PENALTY LANDSCAPE, AND UNITED STATES v. MOFFEIT, 63 M.J. 40 (C.A.A.F. 2006), WHEN IT DID NOT USE THE PROPER STANDARD OF “BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.”

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.