Case ID: njl_87/html/0326-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF PATERSON, APPELLANT, v. THE TOWN OF HARRISON, RESPONDENT.
    Argued November 19, 1914—
    Decided March 1, 1915.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which court the following per curiam was filed:
    
      “Per curiam—The proceedings are affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion'filed in Paterson v. Kearny, 84 N. J. L. 456.”
    For the appellant, Edward F. Merrey, William B. Gourley and John W. Griggs.
    
    For the respondent, Gilbert Collins and Michael T. Barrett.
    
   Per Curiam.

The j udgment under review will be affirmed for the reasons given by us in our 'opinions delivered at the present term in the- cases of The Mayor and Aldermen of Paterson v. The Mayor and Aldermen of Jersey City, ante p. 163, and The Mayor and Aldermen of Paterson v. Town of Kearny, post p. 327.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chieb Justice, Garrison, Trbnciiard, Parker, Bergen, Black, Bogert, Vredenburgh, White, Heppenileimer, Williams, JJ. 12.

For reversal—ISTone.