Case ID: f-appx_333/html/0156-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Raymond L. SEMLER, Appellant, v. Donna FINCH, Appellee.
    No. 09-1189.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 21, 2009.
    Filed: Sept. 28, 2009.
    Raymond L. Semler Moose Lake, MN, pro se.
    Marsha Eldot Devine, Attorney General’s Office, St. Paul, MN, for Appellee.
    Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Raymond L. Semler appeals the district court’s dismissal of his lawsuit raising 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state-law claims. Upon de novo review, see Allen v. Purkett, 5 F.3d 1151, 1153 (8th Cir.1993) (per curiam), we agree with the district court that dismissal was proper because Semler’s claims were barred by res judicata. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable Joan N. Ericlcsen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Raymond L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.