Case ID: f3d_763/html/1088-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Dennis APEL, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Dennis Apel, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Dennis Apel, Defendant-Appellant.
    Nos. 11-50003, 11-50004, 11-50005.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Aug. 14, 2014.
    Erwin Chemerinsky, Selwyn Chu (argued) and Matthew Plunkett (argued), law students, University of California, Irvine School of Law, for DefendanL-Appellant.
    André Birotte Jr., United States Attorney, Robert E. Dugdale and Mark R. Yo-halem (argued), Assistant United States Attorneys, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Before: BARRY G. SILVERMAN and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge.
    
    
      
       The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.
    
   OPINION

PER CURIAM:

On February 26, 2014, the United States Supreme Court vacated our opinion at 676 F.3d 1202 and remanded the case to us for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. United States v. Apel, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1144, 186 L.Ed.2d 75 (2014).

In light of the Supreme Court’s decision, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.