Case ID: ad_274/html/0780-09.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jose A. Gandus, Respondent, v. Sassoon S. Shamash et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of S. Shamash & Sons, Appellants.
   Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ., concur on the ground that they do not pass upon the legal sufficiency of the causes of action alleged in the complaint.