Case ID: sw3d_46/html/0681-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William BRUEGGEMANN, Arlene Brueggemann, Linda Ballowe, Don Wildt, Barb Wildt, Don Dowil, Cheryl Dowil, Don Hull, Jill Hull, Jack Laubinger, Mary Laubinger, Jeanie Epperson, Larry Gildehaus, and Carol Gildehaus, Appellants, v. COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, Franklin County Commission, Gene Scott, Les Bohle, Phyllis Reed, and Eastland Oaks, Inc., Respondents.
    No. ED 78598.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    June 12, 2001.
    
      Edward J. Heisel, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Mark S. Vincent, Union, MO, Isidore I. Lamke, (Eastland Oaks, Inc .) Washington, MO, for respondent.
    Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Brueggemann, Arlene Brueg-gemann, Linda Ballowe, Don Wildt, Barb Wildt, Don Dowil, Cheryl Dowil, Don Hull, Jill Hull, Jack Laubinger, Mary Laubinger, Jeanie Epperson, Larry Gildehaus, and Carol Gildehaus (collectively “Landowners”) appeal from the entry of summary judgment in favor of Franklin County, the Franklin County Commission, Gene Scott, Les Bohle, Phyllis Reed, and Eastland Oaks, Inc. On appeal, Landowners challenge the rezoning of a 105-acre farm from a agricultural/non-urban classification to a residential development classification. We find no error and affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).