Case ID: so2d_961/html/1041-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Isaac SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D01-4710.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    July 18, 2007.
    Rehearing Denied Aug. 27, 2007.
    Isaac Smith, Miami, pro se.
    Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine Germanowiez, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

The Supreme Court of Florida quashed this court’s previous opinion and remanded for reconsideration in light of its decisions in Bates v. State, 887 So.2d 1214 (Fla.2004), and State v. Dickey, 928 So.2d 1193 (Fla.2006). We now affirm.

In this court’s prior opinion, we reversed in part the trial court’s summary denial of Smith’s motion for postconviction relief. We reversed solely as to his second ground, in which he claimed he was prejudiced by the ineffective assistance of his defense counsel for falsely representing to him that his plea would not later be used against him for enhanced sentencing for future crimes.

Under Bates, it appears that the second ground raised in Smith’s motion may have been untimely. In any event, the supreme court decided in Dickey that misadvice about the consequences for a crime not yet committed cannot constitute ineffective assistance of counsel.

Affirmed.

SHAHOOD, C.J., KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur. 
      
      . Smith v. State, 829 So.2d 940 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), quashed, 957 So.2d 556 (Fla.2007).