Case ID: so2d_264/html/0030-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Glimmert BECKHAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 71-1207.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 5, 1972.
    Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Bennett H. Brummer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
    Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The contention presented by the defendant as a ground for reversal of his conviction is ineffective assistance of his counsel in the handling of the cause in the trial court. There as here, the appellant was represented by the p'ublic defender. On the authority and reasoning of Geiger v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 449, the judgment is affirmed, without prejudice to apply in the trial court for relief under Rule 3.850 CrPR, 33 F.S.A.

It is so ordered.