Case ID: misc_191/html/0929-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Maria Conoscente, Respondent, v. Thomas Manfredi, Appellant.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    June 14, 1948.
    
      Joseph C. Bottitta for appellant.
    
      Abraham L. Siegel for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment should he affirmed, with $25 costs to respondent.

The appeals from the orders are dismissed. No order denying defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict is contained in the record. An order denying a motion to reargue is not appeal-able. (N. Y. City Mun. Ct. Code [L. 1915, ch. 279], § 154; Lehman v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp., 30 N. Y. S. 2d 716; Hygrade-Magnet Corp. v. Supino, 23 N. Y. S. 2d 55; Millstein v. Schwarts, 23 N. Y. S. 2d 357.)

MacCbate, Steinbrixii and Rubenstein, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, etc.