Case ID: f-appx_709/html/0231-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Starsha M. SEWELL, M.Ed, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 17-2083
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: January 22, 2018
    Decided: January 24, 2018
    Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Molis-sa Heather Farber, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Joel William Ruderman, PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
    Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court’s orders dismissing this action alleging employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and denying Sewell’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm’n, No. 8:16-cv-02457-PX, 2017 WL 1196614 (D. Md. Mar. 31, 2017; Sept. 12, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED