Case ID: f-appx_73/html/0654-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Pete SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 03-6760.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 28, 2003.
    Decided Sept. 8, 2003.
    Pete Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM:

Pete Smith, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the order of a magistrate judge and dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Smith v. United States, No. CA-03-154-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Apr. 24, 2003; entered Apr. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.