Case ID: nys_60/html/1139-08.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HAAS et al., Respondents, v. HENDRICKS, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    October 25, 1899.)
    Action by Samuel Haas and others against Albert Hendricks. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals.
    Reversed.
    Cardozo Bros., for appellant.
    Maurice Meyer, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

The record failing to show that the defendant resides within the jurisdiction of the municipal court, the judgment must be reversed. Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Mise. Rep. 151, 59 N. Y. Supp. 266, 319. Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.