Case ID: f-appx_12/html/0111-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Darryl Orvett PAYNE-BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer SWIGER, Sergeant; Officer Lewis, Hearing Officer; L.W. Huffman, Regional Director, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 00-7699.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted April 12, 2001.
    Decided April 17, 2001.
    Darryl Payne-Bey, pro se.
    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Darryl Payne-Bey appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Payne-Bey v. Swiger, No. CA-00-806-2 (E.D.Va. Nov. 2, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.