Case ID: njl_65/html/0681-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MAGDELENA SCHEURLE ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. FRANCIS C. HUSBANDS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted December 11, 1900
    Decided March 4, 1901.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    Por the plaintiff in error, Harrison H. Voorhees.
    
    Por the defendants in error, Howard Carrow.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case rendered in the Supreme Court is affirmed in this court, upon the grounds stated in the -opinion of Chief Justice Depue in that court. Ante p. 40.

For affirmance-—The Chancellor, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Bogert, Krueger, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees. 12.

For reversal—Hone.