Case ID: njl_127/html/0564-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MARGARET SCOTT, RESPONDENT, v. HOBOKEN BANK FOR SAVINGS, ETC., APPELLANT.
    Submitted October 31, 1941 —
    Decided January 9, 1942.
    Por the respondent, Collins & Corbin.
    
    Por the appellant, Townsend & Doyle.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, He her, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.