Case ID: so2d_553/html/0396-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William G. KING, Sr., Appellant, v. Adelia T. KING, Appellee.
    No. 88-2967.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Dec. 20, 1989.
    William G. King, Sr., Riviera Beach, pro se.
    Susan M. Seigle of Gay, Ramsey & Lewis, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The pro se appellant asserts as error the trial court’s failure to grant his motion to dismiss this dissolution action. The appel-lee takes the position that the motion was evidentiary and directed to the merits of the ease. However, it was not set for hearing before the trial court, nor did appellant appear at the final judgment hearing to assert his position. Since the error, if any, was not preserved in the trial court, we must affirm. Palmer v. Thomas, 284 So.2d 709 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973).

GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and WARNER, JJ., concur.