Case ID: f-appx_144/html/0857-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

En Xin WU, Petitioner, v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.
    No. 04-12895.
    BIA No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Sept. 30, 2005.
    Thomas Vincent Massucci, New York, NY, for Petitioner.
    Jennie L. Basile, David V. Bernal, Office of Immigration Litigation, Jamie M. Dowd, Ernesto H. Molina, Jr., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before TJOFLAT and BARKETT, Circuit Judges and FULLER, Chief District Judge.
    
      
       Honorable Mark E. Fuller, United States Chief District Judge for the Middle District of Alabama, sitting by designation,
    
   PER CURIAM:

AFFIRMED. See 11th Cir. R. 36-1. 
      
      . 11th Cir. R. 36-1 provides:
      When the court determines that any of the following circumstances exist:
      (a) judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous;
      (b) the evidence in support of a jury verdict is sufficient;
      (c) the order of an administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole;
      (d) summary judgment, directed verdict, or judgment on the pleadings is supported by the record;
      (e) judgment has been entered without a reversible error of law; and an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment or order may be affirmed or enforced without opinion.