Case ID: nys_126/html/1127-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. SPRING and WILLIAMS, J.T.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DAVIS, Respondent, v. HURWITZ, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, .'Fourth Department.
    November 23, 1910.)
    Acition by Louis J. Davis against Louis Hurwitz.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

SPRING and WILLIAMS, J.T.,

dissent, upon the ground that the quantity of stock purchased by the defendant from the plaintiff should have been determined by the actual weights made, instead of from the inventory.