Case ID: njl_109/html/0348-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SICKLEY BROTHERS, RESPONDENT, v. MICHEL & MOORE COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Submitted May 27, 1932 —
    Decided October 17, 1932.
    For the respondent, Riker & Riker.
    
    For the appellant, Jacob E. Max.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.

Eor affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Brogan, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.