Case ID: sw2d_809/html/0126-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nereida BARRON, Petitioner/Respondent, v. George BARRON, Respondent/Appellant.
    No. 58032.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    April 9, 1991.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 15, 1991.
    Frances E. Grecco, St. Louis, for respondent-appellant.
    Nereida Barron, St. Louis, pro se.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from an order denying his motion to set aside a default judgment in a dissolution decree. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).