Case ID: a3d_194/html/1043-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Petitioner v. Francis GALDO, Respondent
    No. 181 EAL 2018
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    October 2, 2018
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Was President Judge Pellegrini correct in dissent that the Commonwealth Court Majority's conclusion - that the property here, acquired by the City through a public-purpose condemnation designed to assist the Commonwealth with the construction of I-95, and then held for subsequent resale, was subject to adverse possession - was mistaken and in conflict with Superior Court precedent?