Case ID: f-appx_654/html/0422-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nathan E. OHUCHE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Bac Home Loans Servicing, LP, f.k.a. Countrywide Home Loan Servicing LP, Federal National Mortgage Association, McCalla Raymer LLC, Defendants-Appellees, Michael Allengood, Individually, Defendant.
    No. 14-15248
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Date Filed: 06/17/2016
    
      Michael Julian Gottlieb, Ryan Y. Park, Boies Schiller & Flexner, LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Michael T. Hosmer, Charlotte, NC, Matthew Allen Fitzgerald, Richmond, VA, McGuireWoods LLP, Jarrod Sean Mendel, McGuireWoods, LLP-GA, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees Bank of America Corporation, Bac Home Loans Servicing, LP, formerly known as Countrywide Home Loan Servicing L.P., Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, Federal National Mortgage Association.
    Andrew G. Phillips, McGuireWoods, LLP-GA, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees Bank of America Corporation, Federal National Mortgage Association.
    Steven James Flynn, Brett Christian Giordano, Jimmy Thomas Howell, Jr., Kimberly Anne Wright, McCalla Raymer, LLC, Roswell, GA, for Defendant-Appel-lee McCalla Raymer LLC.
    Before HULL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and MORENO, District Judge.
    
      
       Honorable Federico A. Moreno, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation.-
    
   PER CURIAM:

After review of the record and the parties’ briefs, with the benefit of oral argument, and for the reasons fully explored at oral argument, we find no reversible error in (i) the district court’s October 22, 2014 order denying plaintiff Ohuche’s motion for reconsideration (of the district court’s September 10, 2014 order dismissing certain claims, remanding certain state law claims to the Superior Court of Fulton County, and denying Ohuche’s motion 'to amend his complaint), and (ii) “all other orders and judgments of the [district] court.”

As aptly stated by the district court, “after numerous attempts to amend his Complaint and refine his theory of liability,” Ohuche appears to “have no other valid claims, or at least no valid federal claims that are not time-barred.” Thus, under these circumstances, Ohuche’s “remaining state law claims would be best litigated in state court, where this ease originated.”

AFFIRMED.