Case ID: ga_175/html/0153-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Gilbert, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Claude Nolan Motor Company v. Cowart.
    No. 9067.
    July 15, 1932.
   Gilbert, J.

1. The single special ground of the motion for a new trial complains that the court erred in admitting, over timely objection, a document called “double guarantee,” shown in the statement of the ease following. Under the pleadings and the evidence this ground does not show error.

2. The verdict is supported by evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Hester & Lewis, for plaintiff in error.

Frederick A. Tuten, contra.