Case ID: so2d_617/html/0403-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Betty T. CHEUNG, Appellant, v. EXECUTIVE CHINA DORAL, INC., and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees.
    No. 92-2134.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 20, 1993.
    Thomas Eugene Zamorano, Miami, for appellant.
    
      William T. Moore, Tallahassee, for appel-lees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and COPE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Because the appeals referee’s determination that the appellant was laid off due to lack of work was supported by competent evidence, it was unjustifiably reversed by the Unemployment Appeals Commission on the basis of its own finding that she voluntarily quit. Iglesias v. Eagle Nat’l Bank of Miami, 598 So.2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Accordingly, the order below is reversed with directions to afford Cheung the unemployment benefits claimed.