Case ID: f-appx_219/html/0301-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Oliver HIGUERA-PINEDA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 06-7854.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 15, 2007.
    Decided: Feb. 26, 2007.
    Oliver Higuera-Pineda, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Oliver Higuera-Pineda, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Higuera-Pineda v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-HC2128-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.