Case ID: so2d_447/html/0396-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard Oliver BEECHAM, Appellant, v. Silvia Ladove BEECHAM, Appellee.
    No. 83-2287.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 20, 1984.
    Shellie Sachs, Miami, for appellant.
    Barry J. Clyman, Miami, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARK-DULL and HUBBART, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review, which was entered pursuant to our decision in Beecham v. Beecham, 407 So.2d 237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), is in complete accordance with that opinion and represents an unassailable exercise of the trial court’s discretion in the light of the record as supplemented by evidence taken after remand. Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So.2d 203 (Fla.1983); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

Affirmed.