Case ID: idaho_101/html/0580-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

618 P.2d 321
    Ed HARROP and Thelma Harrop, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mr. and Mrs. Robert CAMPBELL, husband and wife, and Steven Campbell, Defendants-Respondents.
    No. 13147.
    Supreme Court of Idaho.
    Sept. 26, 1980.
    Steven G. Wood, Pocatello, for plaintiffs-appellants.
    James B. Green and Jim D. Pappas, Pocatello, for defendants-respondents.
   PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff appellants appeal from a district court summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ claim for damages. Plaintiff Thelma Harrop was injured while descending the front steps of defendants’ home after having made a social and religious visit. The trial court concluded that there were no material issues of fact and, based upon the record presented below, ruled that the plaintiffs were “licensees” as a matter of law, relying on our decision in Wilson v. Bogert, 81 Idaho 535, 347 P.2d 341 (1959). The court further ruled that the defendants “violated no duty owed to plaintiffs.”

We affirm. Springer v. Pearson, 96 Idaho 477, 531 P.2d 567 (1975). Costs to respondents.