Case ID: f-appx_582/html/0733-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Youngsoo S. LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 12-56102.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 25, 2014.
    
    Filed July 7, 2014.
    Youngsoo S. Lee, San Dimas, CA, pro se.
    Christopher L. Dueringer, Brad J. Dugan, Bryan Cave LLP, Santa Monica, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: HAWKINS, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Youngsoo S. Lee appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his action arising from foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the denial of a motion brought under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cnty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir.1993). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Lee’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion predicated on newly discovered evidence because Lee failed to establish grounds for such relief. See id. at 1263 (setting forth grounds for reconsideration under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)).

Lee’s contentions regarding the Securities Act of 1933 are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.