Case ID: nys_72/html/1095-12.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BRIERLY, Respondent, v. CONNELLY, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    June, 1901.)
    Action by John J. Brierly against Martin Connelly.
    John P. Flanigan, for appellant. Thomas Garret Fennell, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

There were questions of fact upon which the evidence was conflicting. The case was submitted to the jury under an unexceptionable charge. There aré no exceptions in the case calling for comment. Judgment should be affirmed, with costs, without opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.