Case ID: ny_236/html/0662-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William H. Whaley, Appellant, v. Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, Respondent.
    
      Insurance — action to recover on -policy of accident insurance — insufficiency of notice — extent of disability.
    
    
      Whaley v. Mass. Bonding & Ins. Co., 199 App. Div. 952, affirmed.
    (Argued October 5, 1923;
    decided October 23, 1923.)
    Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 25, 1921, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term. The action was to recover upon a policy of accident insurance. The defense was that notice of the accident had not been sent to the company within thirty days after the accident; and second, that plaintiff had not been immediately, continuously and wholly disabled and prevented from attending to any and every kind of duty pertaining to his occupation, as provided in the poilcy.
    
      Louis E. Fuller for appellant.
    
      Thomas D. Powell for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.