Case ID: sw_182/html/1119-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PRENDERGAST, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CROCKETT v. STATE.
    (No. 3947.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Feb. 9, 1916.)
    Criminal Law <@=3-1090 — Appeal and Error
    —Questions Reviewable.
    On appeal from conviction of crime, where there is no bill of exceptions, and no complaint is made to the charge of the court, the only question presented is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2653, 2789, 2803-2822, 2825-2827, 2927, 2928, 2948, 3204; Dec. Dig. <@=>1090.]
    Appeal from District Court, Sabine County; A. E. Davis, Judge.
    Wilson Crockett was convicted of manslaughter, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    J. W. Minton, of Hemphill, for appellant. C. C. McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   PRENDERGAST, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of manslaughter, and assessed the lowest punishment. ■

The sole question is whether or not the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction. There is no bill of exceptions, and no complaint to the charge of the court.

We have carefully read the testimony more than once, and think it clear that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict. We can see no necessity for detailing the testimony.

The judgment is affirmed. 
      «©^oFor other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes