Case ID: f-appx_488/html/0733-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sanchez HUDSON, a/k/a Chez, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 12-7268.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 13, 2012.
    Decided: Nov. 15, 2012.
    Sanchez Hudson, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    
      Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sanchez Hudson appeals the district court’s order granting counsel’s motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have considered Hudson’s argument on appeal and conclude there was no abuse of discretion by the district court. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004)(stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.