Case ID: f-appx_633/html/0587-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Steven Dixon PRENTICE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Justin ANDREWS; United States of America, Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 15-7542.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Feb. 26, 2016.
    Steven Dixon Prentice, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Ann Kelley, Bureau of Prisons, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit' Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven Dixon Prentice, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Prentice v. Andrews, No. 5:14-hc-02062-BO, 2015 WL 4928953 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 2015; Sept. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       To the extent Prentice challenges the amount collected by the Bureau of Prisons, he failed to show exhaustion of his administrative remedies.