Case ID: njl_87/html/0726-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WILLIAM H. YOUNG, APPELLANT, v. BERNARD L. STAFFORD, RESPONDENT.
    Submitted March 22, 1915—
    Decided June 14, 1915.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 86 N. J. L. 422.
    
    
      For the appellant, Hunziker & Randall.
    
    For the respondent, John A. Stafford.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Garrison in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Swayze, Treno hard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, Yredenbttrgti, White, Terhune, Heppeniteimer, JJ. 11.

For reversal—Hone.