Case ID: f-appx_452/html/0732-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cesar ROMERO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Linda SANDERS, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 10-56249.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 27, 2011.
    
    Filed Oct. 5, 2011.
    Cesar Romero, Lompoc, CA, pro se.
    Margaret L. Carter, Allen W. Chiu, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
    Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Cesar Romero appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Romero contends that, as part of his plea bargain, the government promised that time served as part of a state sentence prior to being sentenced in federal court would be credited toward his federal sentence. This contention is not supported by the record.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.