Case ID: mont_335/html/0088-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "The Honorable Katherine Irigoin", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL THOMAS, Defendant,
    No. DC-05-519
    Decision
   On February 23, 2006, the defendant was sentenced to the following: Count I: Eight (8) years in the Montana State Prison, with three (3) years suspended, for the offense of Criminal Endangerment, a felony; and Count IV: Commitment to the Yellowstone County Detention Facility for a term of ninety (90) days, to run concurrently with Count I, for the offense of Driving a Motor Vehicle Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drugs, a misdemeanor.

On August 10, 2006, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Sandy Selvey. The state was represented by Mark Murphy.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the majority decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 10th day of August, 2006.

DATED this 21st day of August, 2006.

Alt. Chairperson, Hon. Randal I. Spaulding and Alt. Member, Hon. Douglas Harkin.

The Honorable Katherine Irigoin

dissents.

It is Judge Irigoin’s opinion that the sentence is excessive in that it is not consistent with similar crimes in Yellowstone County and that the defendant had no prior felonies. Judge Irigoin added that her decision would have been to amend the sentence to a five (5) year deferred sentence with a $1,000.00 fine.

Member, Hon. Katherine Irigoin.