Case ID: nj_66/html/0139-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HAROLD FINKLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued November 18, 1974
    Decided December 4, 1974.
    
      Mr. Harold Finkle, of the New York Bar, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Morgan F. Thomas, attorney).
    
      Mr. Robert A. Rubenfold, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. 128 N. J. Super. 199.

Clieeobd, J., concurs in the result.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes, Justices Jacobs, Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman, Clieeobd and Judge Col-lestee — 7.

For reversal — None.