Case ID: conn_97/html/0737-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edward Michael vs. Jacob Greenberg et als.
    First Judicial District.
    Argued January 5th
    decided February 21st, 1922.
    Action to recover money paid for goods sold by sample and upon a warranty, and found on inspection not to conform thereto, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in Hartford County, Haines, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff, and appeal by the defendants.
    
      No error.
    
    
      Nathan O. Friedman, for the appellants (defendants).
    
      Henry J. Calnen, for the appellee (plaintiff).
   Per Curiam.

The appeal is confined to a correction of the finding. The first eight assignments of error do not follow our practice; the last six assignments, while not in the most approved form, cannot be said to be void assignments. We have examined the evidence and find no one of the assignments well taken, assuming all were in due form. The appeal seems to us to present no reviewable question.

There is no error.