Case ID: so2d_476/html/0809-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DIXON, C.J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Milton OSBORNE, Jr. v. Jesse N. STONE, Jr. individually and/as President of the Southern University System; B.K. Agnihotri individually and/as Dean of Southern University School of Law; and the Southern University Board of Supervisors.
    No. 85-C-1531.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Oct. 21, 1985.
   In re: Osborne, Milton, Jr.; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; to the Court of Appeal, 472 So.2d 223, First Circuit, Number CA 84 0517; Parish of East Baton Rouge 19th Judicial District Court Div. “H” Number 261,717.

Granted. The contention of laches may not be raised by exception; assuming without deciding that laches' is available in Louisiana, it may be urged only as an affirmative defense. See LSA-C.C.P. art. 1005, Comment (e). The judgments of the trial court and Court of Appeal are vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings according to law.

DIXON, C.J.,

concurs in the grant and reversal and remand. There is no “laches” in La., C.C. 3457. I would remand to determine whether plaintiff abandoned his position or waived his rights.

CALOGERO, J., would simply grant the writ and bring the case up.