Case ID: pa-super_249/html/0550-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: SPAETH, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

377 A.2d 172
    Commonwealth v. Hall, Appellant.
    Submitted November 8, 1976.
    Duke George, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, and Dante G. Bertani, Public Defender, for appellant;
    Robert G. Weisgerber, Assistant District Attorney, and Albert M. Nichols, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
   OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

SPAETH, J.,

dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Commonwealth v. Walak, 228 Pa.Superior Ct. 404, 411, 323 A.2d 886, 890 (1974). See also Commonwealth v. Bradshaw, 238 Pa.Superior Ct. 22, 36, 364 A.2d 702, 709 (1975) (concurring and dissenting opinion by SPAETH, J.).