Case ID: nj-super_110/html/0033-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DOUGLAS ZOLD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
    Argued April 13, 1970
    Decided April 24, 1970
    Before Judges Coneorb, Collester and Kolovsky.
    
      Mr. Daniel R. Coburn, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause fur appellant (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).
    
      Mr. Robert L. Messick, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. A. Donald Bigley, Camden County Prosecutor, attorney).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons given by Judge Peel in his opinion denying post-conviction relief. 105 N. J. Super. 194 (Law Div. 1969).

All 'other questions raised are concluded against defendant by the opinion (unreported) of this court affirming the conviction on the direct appeal.

Judgment affirmed.