Case ID: f-appx_302/html/0615-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Susano MANRIQUE-CASTRUITA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 05-76710.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted Nov. 24, 2008.
    
    Filed Dec. 2, 2008.
    Gerald K. Roberts, Esquire, Pittsburg, CA, for Petitioner.
    Laure F. Einstein, Esquire, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General NW-NYA, Mark L. Gross, Esquire, Oil, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
    Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Susano Manrique-Castruita, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion an IJ’s denial of a motion to continue, Baires v. INS, 856 F.2d 89, 91 (9th Cir.1988), and we deny the petition for review.

The IJ did not abuse his discretion in denying Manrique-Castruita’s fourth request for a continuance. See id.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.