Case ID: ny-2d_55/html/0701-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Rusciano & Son Corporation et al., Appellants-Respondents, v William E. Roche, as Assessor, et al., Respondents-Appellants. In the Matter of Rusciano & Son Corporation et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Richard R. Blessing, as Assessor, et al., Respondents-Appellants.
    Submitted October 26, 1981;
    decided November 23, 1981
   Motions by respondents-appellants for leave to appeal denied. On the court’s own motion, appeal taken as of right by petitioners-appellants-respondents dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the Appellate Division order (70 AD2d 953) granting a new trial, here brought up for review, did not “necessarily affect” the final order, as required by CPLR 5601 (subd [d]). (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 79, pp 344-345.)