Case ID: sw3d_567/html/0306-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mario COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    ED 106060
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    Filed: February 19, 2019
    Susan L. Hogan, 920 Main Street, Suite 500, Kansas City, MO 64105, for appellant.
    Eric S. Schmitt, Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
    Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Mario Coleman (Movant) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).