Case ID: pa_455/html/0645-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "pee Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hall, Appellant, v. Power et al.
    Submitted April 23, 1973.
    Before Jones, C. J., Ea-gen, O’Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix and Manderino, JJ.
    
      Abram P. Piwosky, Abraham J. Gaf ni, and Piwosky and Gafni, for appellant.
    
      Edward V. A. Kussy and Edward A. Hosey, Assistant Attorneys General, Robert W. Cunliffe, Deputy Attorney General, and Israel Packet Attorney General, for Commonwealth, appellee.
    
      November 26, 1973:
   Opinion

pee Curiam,

Tbe order of tbe Commonwealth Court is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Roberts, Mr. Justice Nix, and Mr. Justice Manderino dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinions in Sweigard v. Department of Transportation, 454 Pa. 32, 35, 38, 309 A. 2d 374, 376, 377 (1973); Brown v. Commonwealth, 453 Pa. 566, 577, 579, 580, 305 A. 2d 868, 871, 874, 875 (1973); Biello v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 454 Pa. 179, 187, 301 A. 2d 849, 853 (1973); and Thomas v. Baird, 433 Pa. 482, 485, 252 A. 2d 653, 655 (1969).