Case ID: njl_113/html/0399-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BENJAMIN GOLDFARB, APPELLANT, v. HARRY J. REICHER ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Submitted May 25, 1934
    — Decided September 27, 1934.
    Ror the appellant, Saltzman & Bunevich.
    
    Ror the respondents, Max L. Rosenstein.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Tkenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.