Case ID: sw2d_958/html/0072-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Karl HARMS, Employee/Appellant, v. E & L WRIGHT BRICK & BLOCK, Employer/Respondent, and American Family Mutual Insurance Company, Insurer/Respondent.
    No. 72437.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Dec. 16, 1997.
    James E. Lownsdale, St. Louis, for employee/appellant.
    Todd D. Hilliker, St. Louis, for employer/respondent.
    Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Karl Harms, appeals from a workers’ compensation award issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.

The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).