Case ID: mont_269/html/0050-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. DAVID THURSTON, Defendant.
    NO. BDC 92-262
    DECISION
    DATED this 6th day of May, 1994.
   On December 2,1993, the Defendant was sentenced to twenty (20) years at Montana State Prison for the crime of COUNT I, Sexual Assault, a Felony; and ten (10) years, at Montana State Prison for COUNT II, Sexual Assault, a Felony. COUNT II is suspended, and Counts I and II are to run consecutively. The defendant must adhere to all conditions as stated in the December 2,1993 Judgment. The defendant is given credit for 13 days already served at the Cascade County Jail.

On March 24, 1994, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Defendant was present and proceeded pro se. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall remain the same as originally imposed.

The reason for the decision is the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct pursuant to Section 46-18-904(3), MCA. The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to deem inadequate or excessive as required to overcome the presumption per Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

Hon. G. Todd Baugh, Chairman, Hon. John Warner and Hon. Ted Lympus, Members.

The Sentence Review Board wishes to thank David Thurston for representing himself in this matter.