Case ID: so2d_550/html/1173-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Laura DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. The FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF REGENTS, Appellee.
    No. 88-2559.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 24, 1989.
    Spencer & Klein and Samuel B. Reiner, II, Miami, for appellant.
    Stuzin & Camner and Jeffrey Sloman and Arlette M.. Molina and Diane Ferraro, Miami, for appellee.
    
      Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The record contains no evidence that the Florida State Board of Regents acted in a “capricious, prejudicial, or arbitrary manner.” Militana v. University of Miami, 236 So.2d 162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 962, 91 S.Ct. 970, 28 L.Ed.2d 245 (1971). No genuine issue of material fact exists and, as a matter of law, appellee is entitled to summary judgment in its favor. Anderson v. Maddox, 65 So.2d 299 (Fla.1953); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(c).

Affirmed.