Case ID: ne3d_126/html/1187-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. SKOLNICK.
    No. 2017-1735
    Supreme Court of Ohio.
    Submitted March 7, 2019 Decided March 11, 2019
    {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Howard Evan Skolnick, Attorney Registration No. 0061905, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio.
    {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of August 1, 2018, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year, with the final six months stayed on condition, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).
    {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
    {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).
    {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Skolnick , 153 Ohio St.3d 283, 2018-Ohio-2990, 104 N.E.3d 775.
    O'Connor, C.J., and Kennedy, French, Fischer, DeWine, Donnelly, and Stewart, JJ., concur.