Case ID: sw3d_505/html/0343-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Omoladun Ajoke TIAMIYU, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Owolabi TIAMIYU, Respondent/Appellant.
    No. ED 103853
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    Filed: November 1, 2016
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied December 15, 2016
    Deborah A. Arbogast, St. Louis, MO, for Petitioner/Respondent.
    John E. Richards, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent/Appellant.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Owolabi Tiamiyu appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his Motion to Modify Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage, Verified Motion to Terminate Child Support, Verified Supplemental Motion to Modify and to Terminate Child Support, and Motion for Attorney’s Fees and granting in part Omoladun Ajoke Tiamiyu’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, Kropf v. Jones, 489 S.W.3d 830, 834 (Mo.App. E.D. 2015), and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in its award of attorney’s fees. Lueckenotte v. Lueckenotte, 34 S.W.3d 387, 399 (Mo.banc 2001). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).