Case ID: sw3d_501/html/0910-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Melvis PALMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED103613
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISON TWO.
    Filed: November 1, 2016
    Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, MO, for Plaintiff/Appellant.
    Colette E. Neuner, Jefferson City, MO, for Defendant/Respondent.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J, and Colleen Dolan, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Melvis Palmer (Defendant) appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion alleging there was an insufficient factual basis for the court to accept his plea of guilty to assault in the first degree and sexual assault. We have reviewed thé briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s denial of Defendant’s motion was not clearly erroneous. Morrow v. State, 21 S.W.3d 819, 822 (Mo. banc 2000); Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment of the motion court.