Case ID: so2d_546/html/1192-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Leonard YANKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 87-03400.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Aug. 4, 1989.
    Robert L. Doyel of Doyel and McKinley, Bartow, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Stephen A. Baker and Can-dance M. Sunderland, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in defendant’s contentions on appeal except for his contention that his sentencing guidelines score was erroneously calculated. We agree with that contention. See Yanke v. State, 540 So.2d 848 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 547 So.2d 1212 (1989).

Defendant’s convictions are affirmed, the sentence is reversed, and the cause is remanded for resentencing.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and LEHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.