Case ID: f-appx_599/html/0075-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles M. CASSELL, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FNU DAWKINS, Dr.; David Guinn, P.A., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 14-6997.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 29, 2015.
    Decided: April 2, 2015.
    Charles M. Cassell, III, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

. Charles M. Cassell, III seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(g), 1915A(a), (b)(1) (2012). Although we conclude that Cassell did not have three qualifying previous “strikes” as necessary to justify dismissal' under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), as the district court found, we nonetheless affirm for the reasons given by the district court for dismissal under § 1915A(a), (b). Cassell v. Dawkins, No. 5:14-cv-00089-FDW, 2014 WL 2711847 (W.D.N.C. June'16, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.