Case ID: so2d_93/html/0399-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William O. RAULERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc.
    March 6, 1957.
    Milo I. Thomas, Jr., and Guy Gillen, Lake City, for appellant.
    Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and David U. Tumin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We have examined and considered the record in this case in the light of briefs filed and have also, pursuant to sub-paragraph (2) of Section 924.32, Florida Statutes, 1941, and F.S.A., reviewed the evidence to determine if the interest of justice requires a new trial, with the result that we find no reversible error is made to appear and the evidence does not reveal that the ends of justice require a new trial to be awarded.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., and HOBSON, ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and O’CON-NELL, JJ., concur.

THOMAS, J., not participating because of illness.