Case ID: or-app_110/html/0036-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Submitted on record and briefs October 30,
    reversed and remanded November 27, 1991
    LARRY E. KIRKLAND, Appellant, v. Carl ZENON, Respondent.
    
    (90-C-12086; CA A68098)
    820 P2d 1375
    Stephen J. Bedor, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.
    Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Michael M. Pacheco, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
    Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Deits, Judge.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

In this habeas corpus action, defendant concedes that plaintiff s denial of the key factual allegations in defendant’s return created a material factual dispute and that the replication alleged facts which, if true, constitute a denial of plaintiffs constitutional rights for which there is no other available adequate remedy. The trial court, therefore, erred in granting defendant’s motion to strike and in entering final judgment for defendant. We accept the concessions.

Reversed and remanded.