Case ID: njl_86/html/0374-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE STATE, RESPONDENT, v. HENRY SCHLOSSER AND JOHN SEIBERT, APPELLANTS.
    Submitted March 23, 1914
    Decided May 8, 1914.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 85 N. J. L. 165.
    
    For the plaintiff in error, Lehlbaó'h & Van Dwyne.
    
    For the state, Louis Hood.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Halisch in the Supreme Court.

For affi'mance — Tt-ie Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze. Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenburgi-i, White, Heppenheimer, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Hone.