Case ID: f-appx_361/html/0490-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kareemah BELL-BOSTON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Glenette M. HILTON, Assistant Chief of Police for Administration, University of the District of Columbia, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 09-2288.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 14, 2010.
    Decided: Jan. 20, 2010.
    Kareemah Bell-Boston, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kareemah Bell-Boston appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and improper venue. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bell-Boston v. Hilton, No. 1:09-cv-01227-LMB-IDD (E.D.Va. Oct. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.