Case ID: so2d_935/html/1235-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marvin SULLIVAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 5D05-4141.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Aug. 11, 2006.
    James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Jane C. Almy-Loewinger, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
    Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ann M. Phillips, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Codie v. State, 313 So.2d 754 (Fla.1975) (for the proposition that when a trial court rules upon a motion for judgment of acquittal, all facts introduced into evidence are considered admitted, and the trial court must draw every conclusion and inference from them in favor of the State).

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.