Case ID: so2d_584/html/1138-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

O.D., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 90-2262.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Sept. 17, 1991.
    Harold T. Fields, Miami, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Richard S. Fechter, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
   ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The state has correctly conceded the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the conclusion below that the respondent was guilty as a principal in the crime of robbery. See G.C. v. State, 407 So.2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); J.L.B. v. State, 396 So.2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); J.H. v. State, 370 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 379 So.2d 209 (Fla.1980). Accordingly, the adjudication of delinquency is reversed and the respondent is ordered discharged.