Case ID: ohio-st-3d_71/html/0290-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      \n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Erwin, Appellant.
    [Cite as State v. Erwin (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 290.]
    (No. 94-1685
    Submitted November 29, 1994
    Decided December 23, 1994.)
    
      Robert L. Becker, Licking County Prosecuting Attorney, and Matthew W. McFarland, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
    
      Max R. Erwin, Sr., pro se.
    
   Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its opinion.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.