Case ID: pa_453/html/0619-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam, Mr. Justice Manderino :", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Commonwealth v. Mayberry et al., Appellants.
    
      Argued April 24, 1973.
    Before Jonhs, C. J., Eagan, O’Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix and ManDERINO, JJ.
    
      John J. Dean, Assistant Public Defender, with him George 3. Ross, Public Defender, for appellants.
    
      J. Kent Gulley, Assistant District Attorney, with him Robert L. Eberhardt, Assistant District Attorney, and Robert W. Duggan, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
    July 2,1973:
   Opinion

Per Curiam,

The judgments of contempt are affirmed.

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Manderino :

I dissent because the defendants were entitled to a jury trial. See United States v. Seale, 461 F. 2d 345 (7th Cir. 1972); Commonwealth v. Patterson, 452 Pa. 457, 308 A. 2d 90 (1973) (Manderino, J., dissenting).