Case ID: ny-st-rep_60/html/0874-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Moses R. Crow et al., App’lts, v. William E. Coffin et al., Resp’ts.
    
      Albertos Perry, for app’lts ; Carlisle Norwood, for resp’ts.
   Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order affirming an order granting ’ respondents an addi.iunal allowance of §1,000. An examination ’ of the voluminous record submitted on this appeal discloses that the subj. ct-matter involved is sufficient to warrant the additional allowance granted by the court below. The trial judge decided this to be a difficult, and extraordinary case, under $ 3233 of the Code of Civil Procedure. We see no reason lor i terfering in this matter. The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. All concur. Order affirmed. Aff’g 50 St. Rep. 882.