Case ID: f2d_313/html/0638-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SOUTHWIRE COMPANY, Respondent.
    No. 20008.
    United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
    March 6, 1963.
    Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Alfred Brummel, Atty., Washington, D. C., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., National Labor Relations Bd., for petitioner.
    Frank M. Swift, Atlanta, Ga., Smith, Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hancock, Atlanta, Ga., Holderness & Word, Carroll-ton, Ga., for respondent.
    Before JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges, and GROOMS, District Judge,
   PER CURIAM.

In this proceeding for the enforcement against the respondent of an order of the petitioner, National Labor Relations Board, the only question before us is whether there is substantial evidence on the record as a whole to sustain the Board’s findings. No purpose would be served by a recital of the evidence or of the fact issues which were resolved by the Board. There is substantial evidence to support the findings. The Board’s order will be

Enforced.