Case ID: sw2d_850/html/0126-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Henry SIEGLER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Duane Roy SIEGLER, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. 62323.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    April 13, 1993.
    Edward D. Hoertel, Rolla, for plaintiff, appellant.
    Edward C. Clausen, Carson & Coil, Jefferson City, for defendant, respondent.
    Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a jury verdict in favor of defendant in plaintiffs action for conversion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).