Case ID: so2d_643/html/0129-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. WARNER, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William D. AMBROSE, Appellant, v. Dwane L. FOLSOM and Violet L. Folsom, Appellees.
    No. 93-0973.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Oct. 19, 1994.
    Robert S. Levy, Law Offices of Robert S. Levy, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Charles L. Simon, Charles L. Simon, P.A., N. Miami, and Louis N. Seholnik, Clark & Seholnik, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.
    R. Hugh Lumpkin and Leslie J. Cecil, Keith, Mack, Lewis, Cohen & Lumpkin, Miami, for amicus curiae-Holthouse.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

WARNER, J., dissents with opinion.

WARNER, Judge,

dissenting with opinion.

I would reverse and remand for further proceedings. In my view of the record there was an issue of fact which could not be resolved on a summary judgment, namely the issue of whether or not the acceleration clause had been modified by agreement.