Case ID: f-appx_710/html/0138-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jamaal GITTENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NC DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 17-2106
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: January 30, 2018
    Decided: February 1, 2018
    
      Jamaal Gittens, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamaal Gittens appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint in which he asserted claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gittens v. NC Dep’t of Revenue, No. 3:17-cv-00522-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED