Case ID: so2d_602/html/0974-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. ANSTEAD, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George Jerome SHOOP, Appellant, v. Joe Ann SHOOP, Appellee.
    No. 91-3242.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    July 8, 1992.
    Rehearing Denied Sept. 9, 1992.
    Ronald E. Jones, Ronald E. Jones, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Martin L. Haines, III, Martin L. Haines, III, Chartered, North Palm Beach, for ap-pellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

GUNTHER, J. and ALDERMAN, JAMES E., Senior Justice, concur.

ANSTEAD, J., dissenting in part with opinion.

ANSTEAD, Judge,

dissenting in part.

I dissent only as to the issue of rehabilitative alimony. There is no evidentiary or legal basis for the court’s order that the former husband pay an additional three years of rehabilitative alimony, in addition to permanent periodic alimony.