Case ID: f-appx_88/html/0211-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mariette DO, Petitioner—Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent—Appellee.
    No. 03-72195.
    U.S. Tax Ct. No. 12528-02L.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 17, 2004.
    
    Decided Feb. 24, 2004.
    Mariette Do, pro se, San Diego, CA, Petitioner-Appellant.
    Charles S. Casazza, Gary R. Allen, Gilbert S. Rothenberg, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee.
    Before FERNANDEZ, W. FLETCHER and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Mariette Do appeals pro se the Tax Court’s summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, finding that the Commissioner could proceed with a proposed collection action to satisfy Do’s 1991 income tax obligations.

The Tax Court correctly rejected Do’s contention that she is not obliged to pay federal income tax because she disagrees with United States government policies. Autenrieth v. United States, 418 F.2d 586, 589 (9th Cir.1969). The Tax Court also correctly determined that Do failed to raise any genuine issue of material fact. Hansen v. United States, 7 F.3d 137, 138 (9th Cir.1993). Accordingly, the Tax Court correctly granted the Commissioner’s summary judgment motion.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.