Case ID: misc_187/html/0648-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Keller, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edna I. Brannvall, Plaintiff, v. Carl G. Brannvall, Defendant. 
    City Court of the City of New York, Special Term, New York County,
    May 15, 1946.
    
      Lipper, Shinn & Keeley for defendant.
    
      Isidore Levine for plaintiff.
   Keller, J.

The order sued upon is merely an intermediate order in the New Jersey Chancery Court for the payment of alimony pendente lite. It is not a final decree, and calling it that does not make it one. There is less room for argument that this order is enforcible in the State of New York than there was in the case of Rossi v. Rossi (187 Misc. 543, affd. 269 App. Div. 821), in which case the provision for alimony upon which the action was predicated was incorporated in a final decree of divorce.

The motion is granted. The amended complaint is dismissed. Judgment may be entered accordingly in favor of defendant. Execution of judgment for costs is stayed for ten days after service upon the attorney for plaintiff of a copy of this order with notice of entry.