Case ID: ga_100/html/0095-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Lumpkin, J.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DEEN & COMPANY v. CARTER & COMPANY.
    Submitted November 30,
    Decided December 17, 1896.
    Atkinson, J., disqualifled and not presiding.
    Complaint. Before Judge Sweat. Appling superior ■court. Eebruary 15, 1896.
    
      Elisha, D. QreCha-m, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Atkinson d Dnmoody and T. A. Parker, contra.
   Lumpkin, J.

1. Even if the authenticity and correctness of a book purporting to have been kept by the board ,of trade of a given city, and to be a record of the prices of certain commodities ■sold therein, are on the trial of a particular case sufficiently established to render the book admissible in evidence, its rejection will not be cause for a new trial when it does not appear that admitting it would have established any fact beneficial to the party offering it.

:2. The charges complained of were not erroneous for any reason assigned in the motion for a new trial, and the evidence warranted the verdict. Judgment affirmed.