Case ID: ohio-st-3d_70/html/1210-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Herald, Appellee, v. Hood, Appellant.
    [Cite as Herald v. Hood (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 1210.]
    (No. 93-1864
    Submitted August 31, 1994
    Decided September 28, 1994.)
    
      Robert A Royer and Suzanne C. Porter, for appellee.
    
      Ted Chuparkoff and Wayne Hassay, for appellant.
    
      Joan Krauskopf urging affirmance for amici curiae, Now Legal Defense and Education Fund and Ohio National Organization for Women, Inc.
   Based upon our decision in Ault v. Jasko (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 114, 637 N.E.2d 870, wherein we applied the discovery rule for purposes of tolling the statute of limitations in child-sexual-abuse-repressed-memory cases, this appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Wright, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Ault v. Jasko (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 114, 637 N.E.2d 870.