Case ID: njl_121/html/0585-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MARY ELIZABETH RIDGEWAY, APPELLANT, v. REAL ESTATE OPERATING CO., RESPONDENT.
    Submitted October 28, 1938
    Decided January 13, 1939.
    For the appellant, Sydney A. Gutkin.
    
    For the respondent, Katzenbach, Gildea & Rudner.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Walker, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.