Case ID: so2d_666/html/0316-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Louisiana v. Raymond FLANK.
    No. 93-KH-1094.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Jan. 12, 1996.
   In re Flank, Raymond; Defendant; applying for reconsideration of this Court’s Order dated November 13,1995; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “E”, No. 299-809.

Reconsideration denied. Though relator now points out that he filed an application for post-conviction relief in the district court timely, see, e.g., Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988); State ex rel. Gray. v. State, 94-1002 (La. 6/30/95), 657 So.2d 1005, further review reveals that relator raised identical claims on appeal. See State v. Flank, 537 So.2d 236, 238-42 (La.App. 4th Cir.1988). In this case, the interest of justice does not require further consideration of relator’s repetitive claims. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(A).