Case ID: sw3d_103/html/0810-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Naketia F. WILSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 81393.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Feb. 25, 2003.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 16, 2003.
    Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen. & Patrick T. Morgan, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Naketia Wilson, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The trial court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).