Case ID: so3d_200/html/0801-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Arthur BRITT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D15-2827.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Oct. 7, 2016.
    
      Diana L. Johnson of Johnson and Lufra-no, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Based on the State’s proper concession of error, we reverse and remand for resen-tencing on Counts I and II in accordance with Williams v. State, 186 So.3d 989 (Fla.2016), which held that consecutive mandatory minimum terms under the 10-20-Life statute are permissible but not mandatory where, as here, the defendant shot at multiple victims. In all other respects, we affirm.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED and REMANDED in part.

ROBERTS, C.J., WETHERELL, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.