Case ID: ga_113/html/0724-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "jPish, J.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lane v. The State.
    Submitted July 15,
    Decided July 18, 1901.
   jPish, J.

The only grounds of the motion for a new trial being that the verdict-was contrary to the law and to the evidence, and the evidence being amply sufficient to sustain the verdict, the judgment of the court refusing a new trial is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Indictment for selling crop under lien. Before Judge Adams. City court of Dublin. May 13, 1901.

Howttrd & Armistead, for plaintiff in error.

F. G. Corker, solicitor, contra.