Case ID: so2d_194/html/0916-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard James PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 7372.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
    Feb. 8, 1967.
    Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, Carle-ton, L. Weidemeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.
    Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed under the authority of Thomas v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 328; Linton v. Cox, 358 F.2d 859 (10th Cir. 1966); and Hamrick v. Boles, 231 F.Supp. 507 (N.D.W.Va.1964). Cf. Mason v. United States, 303 F.2d 775 (9th Cir. 1962).

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

ALLEN, C. J., and SHANNON and LILES, JJ., concur.