Case ID: f-appx_322/html/0888-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Ray LANGDON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-16297
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    April 10, 2009.
    Ronald Ray Langdon, Herlong, CA, pro se.
    Michelle Thresher Taylor, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.
    Before BIRCH, PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

James W. Smith, III, appointed counsel for Ronald Ray Langdon, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s order denying Langdon’s motion for relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is AFFIRMED.