Case ID: nj-eq_135/html/0460-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Quigley Company, Inc., respondent, v. Asbestos Limited, Inc., et al., appellants.
    [Decided September 14th, 1944.]
    
      Mr. George L. Burton, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. Max L. Rosenstein, for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The-order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder, and reported at 134 N. J. Eq. 312.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Pabker, Case, Bodine, Donges, ITeheb, Perskie, Poetes, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.