Case ID: f-appx_417/html/0351-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Andre JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT; E.R. Corey, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 10-7393.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 28, 2011.
    Decided: March 18, 2011.
    Andre Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, Davidson & Lindemann, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Andre Jones appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and state law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Camden Police Dep’t, No. 3:09-cv-02161-DCN, 2010 WL 3452338 (D.S.C. Sept 1, 2010; Sept. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.