Case ID: ind_8/html/0473-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The Same Case.
    ON PETITION for a Rehearing .
    
      
       The opinion overruling the petition for rehearing was delivered on the 21st of May, 1857; hut for convenience it is printed here. ,
    
   Per Curiam.

The point on which the petition for a rehearing is rested, is decided at'the May term, 1857, in the Jeffersonville Railroad Company v. Butler, .

To avoid the embarrassment constantly occurring in giving construction to ambiguous language, as in the case of Montgomery v. Doe, 4 Ind. R. 266, the 30th rule was adopted. Its policy to secure accuracy, and to lead this Court at once to the mam question, is obvious; and compliance with it easy.

The petition is overruled.

Same counsel as above. 
      
      
        Post, vol. 9 of these Reports.