Case ID: ga-app_34/html/0134-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Luke, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

16371.
    Pruett v. The State.
    Decided June 9, 1925.
    Indictment for selling liquor; from Milton superior court— Judge Blair. March 14, 1925.
    
      George F. Gober, J. P. Brooke, for plaintiff in error.
    
      John 8. Wood, solicitor-general, contra.
   Luke, J.

Pruett was convicted of violating the prohibition law; and his ■ motion for a new trial assigns error upon the grounds (a) that his conviction was not authorized by the evidence; (&) that the venue was not proved; and- (c) upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. No ground of the motion for a new trial is meritorious.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.