Case ID: sw2d_908/html/0920-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Kwan JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant. Kwan JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    Nos. 63365, 66782.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Nov. 7, 1995.
    Alfred A. Speer, Clayton, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL, and DOWD, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals a judgment entered upon convictions by a jury for murder in the first degree and armed criminal action and the denial of post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).