Case ID: f-appx_388/html/0256-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Veenu MEHTA, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service, a Federal Agency, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 09-1755.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 4, 2010.
    Decided: July 14, 2010.
    Veenu Mehta, Appellant Pro Se. Dana James Boente, Kevin J. Mikolashek, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Veenu Mehta appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mehta v. Potter, No. 1:07-cv-01257-AJT-TRJ, 2009 WL 1598403 (E.D. Va. filed June 4, 2009 & entered June 5, 2009). We deny Mehta’s motion to file a formal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.