Case ID: f-appx_578/html/0993-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PROST, Chief Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CSP TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUD-CHEMIE AG, Sud-Chemie, Inc., Airsec S.A.S., Clariant Produkte Deutschland GMBH, Clariant Corporation, and Clariant Production (France) S.A.S., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 2014-1337.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    Oct. 6, 2014.
    
      James Richard Nuttall, Attorney, John Lloyd Abramic, Attorney, Brandon Cary Helms, Attorney, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Paul H. Berghoff, Esq., Paula Fritsch, Sean Michael Sullivan, McDonnell, Boeh-nen, Hulbert & Berghoff, LLP, Chicago, IL, Jan M. Carroll, Esq., Barnes & Thorn-burg LLP, Indianapolis, IN, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and MOORE, Circuit Judges.
   ON MOTION

PROST, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Appellees move without opposition to dismiss this appeal as premature.

As appellees note, counterclaims for invalidity and patent misuse are unresolved and remain outstanding.

Accordingly, It is Ordered That:

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.