Case ID: ny-2d_58/html/0869-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Martin T. Connell, Appellant, v Robert Ellison et al, Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, and Hilbert F. La Pierre, Third-Party Defendant and Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Mildred M. MacIntyre, Fourth-Party Defendant-Respondent.
    Argued January 6, 1983;
    decided February 10, 1983
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Charles A. Gardner for appellant.
    
      Case, Leader & Ayling for Robert Ellison and another, defendants-respondents.
    
      Sanders D. Heller for Hilbert F. La Pierre, third-party defendant-respondent.
    
      Mahlon T. Clements for Mildred M. MacIntyre, fourth-party defendant-respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (86 AD2d 943). This disposition is without prejudice to either party, if so advised, making application to the trial court to obtain a definition of boundaries of the subject premises.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.