Case ID: ad_221/html/0769-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Max Fine & Sons, Inc., Respondent, v. The Lindarose, Inc., and Others, Defendants. Wolf Gelband, Appellant.
   Motion for reargument denied. While this court affirmed upon the opinion at Special Term, nevertheless the question of compliance with the statute hi regard to the necessary steps to effect the composition or agreement amongst the lienors and the owners was fully considered by the court. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Present — Kelly, P. J., Young, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ. 
      
       See 220 App. Div. 616.— [Rep.
     
      
       See Lien Law, § 26 et seq., as added by Laws of 1916, chap. 507.— [Rep.