Case ID: sw2d_789/html/0895-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jeffrey WALKWITZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 57329.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    June 5, 1990.
    Mary K. Anderson, Columbia, for appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Frank A. Jung, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Jeffrey Walkwitz, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(j). Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 696[2] (Mo. banc 1989). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been supplied with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment.