Case ID: so3d_103/html/0273-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Walter H. WARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D12-2917.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 26, 2012.
    William Earl Ploss, Miami, for appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Natalia Costea, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    
      Before CORTIÑAS, FERNANDEZ and LOGUE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); see also Nelson v. State, 875 So.2d 579, 583 (Fla.2004) (“Under the circumstances of this case, a defendant would be required to allege what testimony defense counsel could have elicited from witnesses and how defense counsel’s failure to call, interview, or present the witnesses who would have so testified prejudiced the case.”).