Case ID: ark_298/html/0550-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carthel J. HODGES, Sr. v. Mary Ann HODGES
    89-122
    771 S.W.2d 741
    Supreme Court of Arkansas
    Opinion delivered May 1, 1989
    
      Herrods of Arkansas, P.A., by: E.H. “Buz” Herrod, for petitioner.
    
      Steve Clark, Att’y Gen., by: Paul Cherry, Asst. Att’y Gen., for respondent Pulaski County Chancery Court, Second Division.
   Per Curiam.

We deny the petitioner’s request for a writ of prohibition, but we do so because the record and orders presented to us are unclear. In denying such relief, we in no way intend to give validity to the standing master order entered below, but assume that any issue addressing that point would be presented to us along with any other in any appeal.

Hickman, J., not participating.