Case ID: ct-intl-trade_28/html/1217-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "RESTANI, Chief Judge:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

AG der Dillinger Hüttenwerke, EKO Stahl GmbH, Salzgitter AG Stahl und Technologie, Stahlwerke Bremen GmbH, and Thyssen Krupp Stahl AG, Plaintiffs, v. United States, Defendant, v. International Steel Group, Inc., and United States Steel LLC, Defendant-Intervenors.
    Court No. 00-00437
   JUDGMENT

RESTANI, Chief Judge:

Upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss, the Government’s cross-motion to dismiss on the grounds of mootness, and all other pertinent papers and proceedings, it is hereby

ORDERED that Defendant’s cross-motion is denied, because the prospective relief afforded pursuant to a changed circumstances review is less than the full relief Plaintiffs sought in initiating this action challenging Commerce’s sunset determination. The remaining justiciable controversy has been resolved by the settlement agreement between Plaintiffs and Defendant-Intervenors, and therefore it is

ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion is hereby granted; and it is further

ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice; and it is further

ORDERED that the court shall retain jurisdiction over this action to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement between Plaintiffs and Defendant-Intervenors.