Case ID: f-appx_196/html/0166-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Amar BEY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED; Teamsters Local Union No. 71, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 06-1346.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 24, 2006.
    Decided: Aug. 29, 2006.
    Amar Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Meredith S. Jeffries, Susan Ballantine Molony, Alston & Bird, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; John David James, Smith, James, Rowlett & Cohen, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina; James Francis Walling-ton, Baptiste & Wilder, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
    Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Amar Bey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claim that his employer violated Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”) and that his union breached its duty of fair representation regarding his termination. The district court construed his complaint to be a “hybrid 301” action under the LMRA. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bey v. UPS, No. 5:05-cv-00208 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 13, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.