Case ID: so2d_638/html/0054-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lawrence B. FOLSOM, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 82289.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    June 9, 1994.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and D.P. Chanco, Asst. Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, for petitioners.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Stephen A. Baker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review State v. Folsom, 630 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), which certified for review questions essentially the same as those answered in Veilleux v. State, 635 So.2d 977 (Fla.1994), and Carino v. State, 635 So.2d 9 (Fla.1994). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. The decision below is approved on the authority of Veilleux and Carino. The fourth issue raised by the State is moot and will not be addressed here.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., and McDONALD, Senior Justice, concur.