Case ID: f_243/html/0930-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MORTON, District Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ATHERTON et al. v. BEAMAN.
    (District Court, D. Massachusetts.
    April 20, 1917.)
    No. 786.
    Bankruptcy <@=>293(1)—Trustees—Plenary Action.
    Trustees in bankruptcy may resort to a plenary action in the District Court to protect their right to the possession of personal property belonging to the bankrupt.
    In Equity.- Bill by Percy A. Atherton and others, trustees in bankruptcy, against Nathaniel P. Beaman. On motion to dismiss.
    Motion overruled.
    Swift, Friedman & Atherton, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs.
    Foster & Turner, Reginald Foster, Wm. D. Turner, and George Hoague, all of Boston, Mass., for defendant.
   MORTON, District Judge.

If trustees in bankruptcy may resort to a plenary action in this court to protect their right to the possession of personal property belonging to the bankrupt, the present bill of complaint concededly states a case. In Whitney v. Wenman, 198 U. S. 539, at page 553, 25 Sup. Ct. 778, 49 L. Ed. 1157, a plenary suit instituted by trustees in bankruptcy to regain possession of property alleged to belong to the estate was expressly approved by the Supreme Court.

The question raised by the motion to dismiss is concluded by that decision, and the motion must be overruled.