Case ID: mann-unrep-cas_1/html/0264-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Spencer, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 952.
    S. C. Huey et al. vs. Jemima Huey et al.
    The fact that a husband uses his own money in the purchase of property during the community does not divest the community of it. The property thus bought belongs to the community, and the husband becomes its creditor pro tanto.
    
    The fact that a piece of real estate was put on the inventory as separate property of the husband does not conclude the widow from claiming it as community.
    An administrator has nothing to do with partitioning successions. After paying the debts, his duty is to deliver the property to the heirs.
    Appeal from the District Court for Lincoln, Pearce, J. ad hoc.
    
    
      Gaskins and Barksdale for Plaintiffs Appellants. Young & Vaughn for Defendants.
   Spencer, J.,

delivered the opinion amending the judgment.