Case ID: ga-app_35/html/0593-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bboyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

17419, 17420.
    Maples v. The State.
    Criminal Law, 17 C. J. p. 212, n. 18.
    Decided July 14, 1926.
    Profane language, etc.; from Miller superior court—Judge Yeomans. March 29, 1926.
    
      P. Z. Geer, for plaintiff in error.
    
      B. T. Gastellow, solicitor-general, B. B. Arnold, E. G. Bill, contra.
   Bboyles, C. J.

1. The amendment to the motion for a new trial in' each of these two cases is without merit.

2. The general grounds of the motions for a new trial, not being argued or insisted upon in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodioorth, JJ., eoneur.