Case ID: so2d_512/html/1161-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dwight REID, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 86-2176.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Sept. 29, 1987.
    Samek & Besser and Lawrence Besser, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before HENDRY, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Mulvey v. State, 41 So.2d 156 (Fla.1949); Myers v. State, 499 So.2d 895 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). This case presents the same question certified in Bellinger v. State, 513 So.2d 732 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); and Condiles v. State, 512 So.2d 331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987):

IS USE OF THE HABITUAL OFFENDER STATUTE TO EXCEED THE STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED MAXIMUM SENTENCE FOR THE OFFENSE PRECLUDED WHERE THE SENTENCE IMPOSED DOES NOT EXCEED THE RECOMMENDED GUIDELINE SENTENCE?

Question certified.