Case ID: ad3d_127/html/0045-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[4 NYS3d 532]
    In the Matter of Michael M. Lippman (Admitted as Michael Martin Lippman), an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, Petitioner.
    Second Department,
    April 1, 2015
    APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Gary L. Casella, White Plains {Forrest Strauss of counsel), for petitioner.
    
      
      Murray M. Rickman, Bronx, for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

On September 30, 2014, the respondent pleaded guilty in the Supreme Court, Bronx County, to two counts of grand larceny in the third degree, class D felonies, in violation of Penal Law § 155.35 (1). As the former Public Administrator in and for Bronx County, the respondent admitted that he stole property valued at $88,209 from the estate of Cushman and property valued at $57,620.50 from the estate of Rizzo. In each instance, the value of the stolen property exceeded $50,000.

The Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District now moves to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b) based upon his felony conviction. The respondent has been served via his counsel and has not opposed or otherwise responded to the instant motion.

By virtue of his felony conviction, the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a), and was automatically disbarred on September 30, 2014. Accordingly, the Grievance Committee’s motion to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b) is granted, to reflect the respondent’s automatic disbarment on September 30, 2014.

Eng, P.J., Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Roman, JJ., concur.

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a), the respondent, Michael M. Lippman, admitted as Michael Martin Lippman, is disbarred, effective September 30, 2014, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b); and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent, Michael M. Lippman, admitted as Michael Martin Lippman, shall comply with this Court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, the respondent, Michael M. Lippman, admitted as Michael Martin Lippman, is commanded to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that if the respondent, Michael M. Lippman, admitted as Michael Martin Lippman, has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency and the respondent shall certify to the same in his affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.10 (f).