Case ID: sw2d_823/html/0004-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jerry NISHKE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. 59170.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    July 30, 1991.
    
      Jeannie Arterburn, St. Louis, for movant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
   ORDER

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-eonviction relief. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).