Case ID: njl_104/html/0669-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HARRY R. YOUNG ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. JAMES R. CRUMBIE, APPELLANT.
    Argued February 16, 1928
    Decided May 14, 1928.
    For the respondents, Bourgeois & Coulomb.
    
    For the appellant, Louis A. Bepetto.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Katzenbach, Campbell, Yan Buskirk, Mc-Glennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.