Case ID: so2d_418/html/0451-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. DAUKSCH, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carolyn W. YAHRLING, Appellant, v. CITY OF ORLANDO, Appellee.
    No. 81-1585.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Aug. 25, 1982.
    Joe B. Weeks, Winter Park, for appellant.
    James 0. Driscoll, of Driscoll, Langston & Kane, P. A., Orlando, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.

DAUKSCH, J., dissents with opinion.

DAUKSCH, Judge,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in a personal injury case and the undisputed facts are that appellant was driving her car along an unfamiliar street in Orlando and as she rounded a curve her car left the roadway and struck a tree, injuring her. There are issues of fact; one of which is whether the city breached a duty to warn of a dangerous curve. Because issues of fact cannot be resolved by summary judgment, I would reverse the same. Wills v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, 351 So.2d 29 (Fla.1977); Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966).