Case ID: so2d_204/html/0539-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ruth E. BERNSTEIN, Appellant, v. GOODBODY & COMPANY, a New York Limited Partnership, Appellee.
    No. 67-207.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    Dec. 5, 1967.
    Rehearing Denied Dec. 21, 1967.
    Howard A. Rose and Norman Scvin, Miami, for appellant.
    Dixon, Dejarnette, Bradford, Williams, McKay & Kimbrell and Carl K. Ploffmann, Miami, for appellee.
    Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Automatic Canteen Company of America v. Butler, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 712; 21 Fla.Jur., Limitation of Actions, § 37; §§ 95.11(4), 95.11(5) (c), Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; Vol. 1, Williston on Contracts, 3rd Ed., §§ 73, 83, 85, 86.