Case ID: us_293/html/0518-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 163.
    Wade et al. v. Jacksonville.
    Motion submitted September 10, 1934.
    Decided October 8, 1934.
    
      Mr. Thomas B. Adams for appellants. Mr. Oscar O. McCollum for appellee.
   Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed (1) for the want of properly presented federal questions (Dewey v. Des Moines, 173 U. S. 193, 197-200; Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 360, 362, 363; Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Ry. Co. v. McGuire, 196 U. S. 128, 131-133; Archerd v. Oregon, 290 U. S. 604), and (2) for the want of a substantial federal question (Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 681-684; Ballard v. Hunter, 204 U. S. 241, 256, 257; Witherspoon v. Duncan, 4 Wall. 210, 217; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316, 317).