Case ID: pa_418/html/0624-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

King Appeal.
    Argued April 29, 1965.
    Before Bell, C. J., Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.
    
      Norman Seidel, with him Justin K. McCarthy and Daniel L. McCarthy, for appellants.
    
      Alfred T. Williams, Jr., with him H. P. McFadden, and McFadden, Biskin & Williams, for redevelopment authority, appellee.
    May 27, 1965:
   Opinion

Per Curiam,

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Roberts would reverse because of the authority’s failure to comply with a rule of the court below.