Case ID: f-appx_589/html/0194-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re: Jerry Wayne SHARPE, Petitioner.
    No. 14-2236.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 15, 2015.
    Decided: Jan. 20, 2015.
    Jerry Wayne Sharpe, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Wayne Sharpe petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling state officials to process his pardon application and declare him innocent of state convictions. We conclude that Sharpe is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief, a drastic remedy, should be used only in extraordinary circumstances and when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 383 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir.2003). This court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state officials. Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg Cnty., 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir.1969). To the extent Sharpe seeks an order from this court, directing the district court to act on his complaint, we find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court.

Accordingly, although we grant Sharpe leave to amend, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.