Case ID: f-appx_104/html/0682-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy L. FROST, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-10242.
    D.C. No. CR-02-00117-1-DAE.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 9, 2004.
    
    Decided Aug. 16, 2004.
    Wes R. Porter, U.S. Attorney Office of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.
    Arthur E. Ross, Honolulu, HI, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, RAWLINSON and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Roy L. Frost appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 27-month sentence for possession of an unregistered firearm, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5845(a), 5861(d).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Frost has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Frost has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.