Case ID: kan_84/html/0891-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James S. Murphy, Appellee, v. The Edgar Zinc Company, Appellant.
    
    No. 16,724.
    Appeal from Wilson district court.
    Opinion on rehearing, filed May 6, 1911.
    Reaffirmed.
    (For original •opinion, see 83 Kan. 627.)
    
      O. P. Ergenbright, for the appellant.
    
      James A. Brady, and Francis M. Brady, for the appellee.
   Per Curiam:

The court adheres to the conclusions reached ■on the former hearing (Murphy v. Edgar, 83 Kan. 627) and the judgment is therefore reaffirmed.