Case ID: f-appx_165/html/0515-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Xiaolong QI, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 04-72055.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 9, 2006.
    
    Decided Jan. 17, 2006.
    Before: HUG, O’SCANNLAIN, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Xiaolong Qi, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing the appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review sua sponte the question of whether the BIA had jurisdiction. See Da Cruz v. INS, 4 F.3d 721, 722 (9th Cir.1993).

We remand this case to the BIA for it to consider expressly whether it has jurisdiction over Qi’s appeal in light of the “rare circumstances” exception explained in Oh v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 611, 614 (9th Cir.2005). See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-17, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (holding that when an agency has not reached an issue, the proper course is to remand to the agency in the first instance to address).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED and REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.