Case ID: ga_180/html/0224-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Atkinson, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Brown v. The State.
    No. 10273.
    February 12, 1935.
    
      Harvey Hill and Walter Hall, for plaintiff in error.
    
      M. J. Yeomans, attorney-general, John A. Boyldn, solicitor-general, B. D. Murphy, J. T. Goree, H. J. Glower, J. W. LeCraw, and J ohn II. Hudson, contra.
   Atkinson, Justice.

There being-no complaint of any error committed on the trial, and the evidence being sufficient to authorize the verdict, the judgment refusing a new trial will not be disturbed. Canida, v. State, 130 Ga. 15 (2) (60 S. E. 104) ; Stone v. State, ante, 223.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.