Case ID: ad3d_105/html/0654-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Poole, Appellant.
    [963 NYS2d 259]
   Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene D. Goldberg, J.), entered May 24, 2011, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A level three adjudication is appropriate. Both the court’s upward departure to level three, which formed an alternative basis for the adjudication, and its refusal to grant a downward departure were provident exercises of discretion. £<[T]he level suggested by the [risk assessment instrument] is merely presumptive and a SORA court possesses the discretion to impose a lower or higher risk level if it concludes that the factors in the RAI do not result in an appropriate designation” (.People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 568 n 2 [2009]; see also People v Johnson, 11 NY3d 416, 421 [2008]).

The fact that defendant consciously chose a victim who was asleep and thus was particularly vulnerable is a significant aggravating factor. Furthermore, defendant has a serious criminal record, and the fact that he committed sex crimes against children in separate incidents, years apart, suggests a dangerous propensity. The mitigating factors asserted by defendant in support of his request for a downward departure were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument, and were outweighed by the aggravating factors (see e.g. People v Melendez, 83 AD3d 448 [1st Dept 2011]).

Concur—Andrias, J.E, Saxe, DeGrasse, Richter and Gische, JJ.