Case ID: us_273/html/0636-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      \n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 194.
    Dan Bartoncini v. United States.
    Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.
    Motion to dismiss or advance submitted October 4, 1926.
    Decided October 11, 1926.
    
      Solicitor General Mitchell for the United States,'in support of the motion.
   Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195.

Mr. Ernest B. D. Spagnoli for plaintiff in error, in opposition thereto.