Case ID: nj-eq_92/html/0463-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George Wilson et al., trading as United Tin Trading Company, respondents, v. Marion E. Sandall, appellant.
    [Decided February 28th, 1921.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported ante p. 130.
    
    
      Mr. Norman Grey, for the respondents.
    
      Mr. Lewis Fisher, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzbnbaci-i, White, ITeprenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Aokerson—15. .

For reversal—None.