Case ID: f-appx_470/html/0388-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cynthia L. BUTTS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. DRESS BARN, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 11-30739
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    May 17, 2012.
    Cynthia L. Butts, Montgomery, AL, pro se.
    Kate Lesley Birenbaum, Seyfarth Shaw, L.L.P., Houston, TX, Jason Blance Nichols, Cook, Yancey, King & Galloway, a P.L.C., Shreveport, LA, for Defendants Appellee.
    Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The plaintiff has been given extensive attention and opportunity to proceed with her claim despite her refusal to respond to orders and consent to discovery. Judgment was rendered dismissing the case for failure to prosecute.

Plaintiff presents this court no legal error by the district court. Consequently . this court can only affirm.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.