Case ID: sw3d_414/html/0675-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Paul Ray GOODWATER, Appellant.
    No. WD 75441.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Nov. 19, 2013.
    Timothy A. Blackwell, for Respondent.
    Nancy A. McKerrow, for Appellant.
    
      Before Division II: MARK D. PFEIFFER, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Paul Goodwater appeals from his convictions following a jury trial for twenty counts of possession of child pornography, section 573.037, RSMo Cum.Supp.2012. In his sole point on appeal, he claims that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the proposed testimony of eleven witnesses that he had repaired their computers and had backed up their files as part of the process. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).