Case ID: so2d_889/html/0119-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marta RIESCO, Appellant, v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION and Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., Appellees.
    No. 3D03-2113.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 24, 2004.
    
      Teri Guttraan Valdes, Miami, for appellant.
    John D. Maher (Tallahassee), for appel-lee Florida UAC.
    Before GREEN, FLETCHER, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The decision below denying unemployment compensation benefits is reversed because the conduct complained of did not, as a matter law, amount to disqualifying “misconduct.” § 443.036(29), Fla. Stat. (2003); Castillo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 785 So.2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). After remand, the appellant shall be awarded the benefits claimed.