Case ID: f-appx_301/html/0729-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Seth Eagle RICHESON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-30479.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 24, 2008.
    
    Filed Nov. 26, 2008.
    Jo Ann Farrington, Audrey Jane Renschen, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Anchorage, AK, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Sue Ellen Tatter, Esquire, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Anchorage, AK, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Seth Eagle Richeson appeals from the 51-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B), (b)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Richeson contends that the district court procedurally erred by: (1) failing to properly consider the nature and circumstances of his offense; (2) failing to give adequate weight to his history and characteristics; and (3) treating the Guidelines range as presumptively reasonable. These contentions are not supported by the record. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-95 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc). We further conclude that, in light of the totality of the circumstances, the sentence is substantively reasonable. See id. at 993.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.