Case ID: okla-crim_43/html/0040-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "EDWARDS, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re OPINION OF THE JUDGES. In re CLAUDE (BLACKIE) HAGER.
    No. A-7356.
    Opinion Filed May 11, 1929.
    (277 Pac. 283.)
   To His Excellency, the Governor of the State of Oklahoma — Sir:

In response to your official communication of April 26, 1929, addressed to this court, asking for an opinion as provided in section 2786, Comp. Stat. 1921, in the matter of the conviction of Claude (Blackie) Hager for the crime of murder in the district court of Ottawa county on February 18,1929, and by judgment of said court sentenced to death 'by electrocution on May 10, 1929, within the walls of the state penitentiary at McAlester, we hereby submit the following opinion of the judges:

EDWARDS, P. J.

The record submitted, and to which is attached your request for opinion, discloses that the defendant, Claude (Blackie) Hager, was charged with murder in the district court of Ottawa county. Upon a trial of said charge he was convicted, and sentence of death was rendered February 18, 1929. Under the Constitution and laws of this state, any person convicted of felony may appeal within six months from the time judgment is rendered. Section 2808, Comp. Stat. 1921. This time does not expire until August 18, 1929, but on April 30, 1929, defendant filed in this court his appeal from the judgment and sentence aforesaid. It has been the uniform holding of this court that the provisions of section 2786 of the statute contemplates an advisory opinion, where an appeal has not been taken from the judgment and sentence of death. To render an advisory opinion where an appeal has been perfected, and before the same has been briefed, argued, and submitted, would be to prejudge a case upon an ex parte proceeding.

The appeal having been lodged in this court, such appeal automatically gave the accused a right to suspension of execution of the sentence of death until his appeal has been determined. An order staying execution has been made by this court, and the case will be duly reviewed on the appeal.

DAVENPORT and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.