Case ID: f-appx_267/html/0618-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dee M. ROBY, Esq., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.; Carol Hickey; Debra Whalen; Pat Newton; Does 1-50, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 06-15703.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 13, 2008.
    
    Filed Feb. 20, 2008.
    F. Anthony Edwards, Esq., Seibel Finta & Edwards, Walnut Creek, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Sheila Marie Kiernan, Esq., Nixon Peabody LLP, Paula Champagne, Esq., Littler Mendelson, PC, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: D.W. NELSON, KLEINFELD, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Dee M. Roby (“Roby”) appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to American Airlines, Inc. Pointing to no district court error in her opening brief, she attempts to raise an entirely new claim for the first time on appeal. We do not generally entertain arguments not raised before the district court, Doi v. Halekulani Corp., 276 F.3d 1131, 1140 (9th Cir.2002), and Roby’s claim does not fit within any of the exceptional reasons for deviating from this rule, Bolker v. C.I.R., 760 F.2d 1039, 1042 (9th Cir.1985).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.