Case ID: misc2d_53/html/0644-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Uni-Serv Corp., Appellant, v. Albert W. Frede, Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    March 16, 1967.
    
      Royall, Koegel & Rogers (William J. Ryan and Joseph H. Spam of counsel), for appellant. Van B. Kruchten for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We affirm on the ground that plaintiff has failed to establish the existence of the contract on which it sued. We reach no other issue.

The judgment should be affirmed, with $25 costs.

Concur — Hecht, Jr., J. P., Gold and Hopstadter, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, etc.