Case ID: so2d_879/html/0112-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "CALOGERO, Chief Justice,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Sarah E. BLEICHNER.
    No. 2004-OB-0902.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    May 14, 2004.
    CALOGERO, C.J., concurs with reasons.
   CALOGERO, Chief Justice,

concurs.

I concur in the majority’s decision to deny the petition, because my contrary opinion expressed in dissent in In re: Bourke, 02-1468 (La.6/14/02), 819 So.2d 1020, citing to In re: Appert, 444 So.2d 1208 (La.1984), and In re: Application of Respondek, 442 So.2d 435 (La.1983), has not borne fruit, and today’s decision follows the recently decided cases on this issue.