Case ID: or-app_27/html/0063-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued September 23,
    affirmed October 4, 1976
    In the Matter of the Dissolution of the Marriage of KASSELL, Appellant, and KASSELL, Respondent.
    
    (No. 91602, CA 6248)
    554 P2d 634
    
      David W. Hittle, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Dye & Olson, Salem.
    
      David Price, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief was Jerry Kleen, Salem.
    Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Fort and Thornton, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

In this dissolution-of-marriage proceeding the husband contends that the property division decreed by the trial court was inequitable and that the trial court erred in allowing the wife $200 on account of attorney fees. We do not agree with either contention.

Affirmed. No costs to either party.