Case ID: sw2d_492/html/0482-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DOUGLAS, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Clarence BENNETT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
    No. 46742.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    April 11, 1973.
    Rehearing Denied April 25, 1973.
    Roy Y. Martin, Austin, for appellant.
    Robert O. Smith, Dist. Atty., and Neal Pfeiffer, Asst. Dist. Atty., Austin, Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., and Robert A. Hut-tash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.
   OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of rape. The court assessed punishment at thirty years.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a brief in which he concludes the present appeal is frivolous. Further, the record reflects that appellant has been served with a copy of appellant’s brief. No pro se brief has been filed. The procedure is in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and the procedure in this State. We have examined the record and agree that the appeal is wholly without merit.

No reversible error being shown, the judgment is affirmed.