Case ID: nj-tax_24/html/0415-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MICHAEL & HELEN KAPLAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. MORRIS & SANDRA LISMAN-KAPLAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
    Argued January 27, 2009
    Decided February 11, 2009.
    
      Ronald S. Blumstein, argued the cause for appellants.
    Ramanjit K. Chawla, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Anne Milgram, Attorney General, attorney; Lewis Scheindlin, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Ms. Chawla, on the brief).
    Before Judges SKILLMAN, GRAVES and GRALL.
   PER CURIAM.

The judgments of the Tax Court are affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Kuskin’s opinion reported in 23 N.J.Tax 594 (2008).