Case ID: sw3d_209/html/0539-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Pamela Sue VESTER-BATES, Appellant-Employee, v. PONDEROSA STEAK HOUSE, Respondent-Employer.
    No. ED 88108.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Dec. 26, 2006.
    Ray A. Gerritzen, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Mary Flanagan-Dean, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J„ and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Pamela Sue Vester-Bates (“Vester-Bates”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) after the Commission found that Vester-Bates was partially disabled while working for her employer, Respondent Ponderosa Steak House, and awarded her, inter alia, temporary total disability benefits of $79.67/ week.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been given a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).