Case ID: sw_198/html/0146-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DAVIDSON, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

VANCE et al. v. STATE.
    (No. 4642.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Oct. 24, 1917.)
    Criminal Law <©=>1053 — Appeal — Exceptions.
    Where no exceptions were reserved to the charges or any other matter arising on the trial, a conviction must be affirmed; the evidence not being before the appellate court.
    Appeal from District Court, Potter County; .Hugh L. Umphres, Judge. '
    Jim Vance and another were convicted of burglary, and they appeal.
    Affirmed.
    E. B. Hendricks, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellants were convicted of burglary, and their punishment assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary each.

The court gave a charge, and an additional charge. There were no exceptions reserved to the charges, or any other matter arising on the trial, and the evidence is not before us. So far as we are able to discover from the record, there is nothing requiring a reversal. In fact, the matters presented in the motion for new trial cannot be intelligently revised without the evidence.

The judgm’ent will thereafter be affirmed. 
      other cases see same topic and KEt-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes