Case ID: f-appx_142/html/0925-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert T. MITRIONE and Marla A. Devore, Defendants-Appellants.
    Nos. 02-4222, 02-4224.
    United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
    Aug. 26, 2005.
    Patrick Hansen, Linda L. Mullen, Springfield, IL, Office of the United States Attorney, Rock Island, IL, for PlaintiffAppellee.
    Cathy A. Pilkington, Chicago, IL, Thomas M. Dawson, Leavenworth, KS, for Defendants-Appellants.
    Before ROVNER, EVANS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

After our limited remand under United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 483-84 (7th Cir.2005), the district judge concluded, unequivocally, that knowledge about the advisory status of the sentencing guidelines would not have affected her decision. She would have imposed the same sentence as originally imposed on both Robert Mitrione and Marla DeVore. Those sentences, we conclude, could not be viewed as unreasonable. Accordingly, the defendants’ objections to their sentences are rejected, and the judgments under appeal are AFFIRMED.