Case ID: f-appx_692/html/0132-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frederick SELLERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 17-6248
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 20, 2017
    Decided: June 23, 2017
    Frederick Sellers, Appellant Pro Se.
    Erin Carter Tison, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Sellers appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Sellers’ motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sellers v. United States, No. 2:15-cv-00079-JPB-RWT, 2017 WL 634514 (N.D. W. Va., Feb. 16, 2017). However, because the district court, which lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over Sellers’ complaint, dismissed Sellers’ unnecessary surgery claim with prejudice, we vacate this portion of the judgment and remand the case with instructions to dismiss the claim without prejudice. See S. Walk at Broadlands Homeowner’s Ass’n v. OpenBand at Broadlands, LLC, 713 F.3d 175, 185 (4th Cir. 2013) (explaining that dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction must be without prejudice); see also Robb v. United States, 80 F.3d 884, 887 n.2 (4th Cir. 1996) (finding dismissal under independent contractor exception is dismissal for want of subject-matter jurisdiction).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS