Case ID: njl_86/html/0356-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ENEY GRUPELLI, APPELLANT, v. JACOB ROSEN, RESPONDENT.
    Argued March 10, 1914
    Decided May 19, 1914.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which court the following per curiam was filed:
    
      The question presented in this case was decided by our Court of Errors and Appeals in Mangonaro v. Kare, 84 N. J. L. 408.
    The judgment below will be affirmed, with costs.
    For the appellant, Charles A. Bathbun.
    
    For the appellee, Willard W. Cutler.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review. should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Parker, Bergen, Kalisoii, Bogert, Yredenpurgh, White, Heppenheimer, JJ. 9.

For reversal — JSTone.