Case ID: nys_20/html/0989-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bischoff, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Fulton, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., Appellant.
    
      (Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.
    
    December 5, 1892.)
    Motion for leave to appeal. See 19 N. Y. Supp. 660.
    Argued before Daly, C. J., and Bischoff and Pryor, JJ.
    
      R. & W. Arnoux, for appellant. A. I. Sire, for respondent
   Bischoff, J.

No sufficient ground is assigned in support of this motion. Reference to the opinions (19 N. Y. Supp. 660) disclosed that no novel question of law was involved in the appeal, which is our only justification for adding to the seriously lengthened calendar of the court of last resort. Hence the leave asked for, if granted, could result only in vexations, delay, and expense to the respondent Motion denied, with $10 costs.