Case ID: ny_157/html/0688-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hormisdas De Loge, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
    
      Be Loge v. N. Y. 0. & H. B. B. B. Go., 92 Hun, 149, affirmed.
    (Submitted October 11, 1898;
    decided October 25, 1898.)
    Appeal from a judgment and order of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 9, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
    
      Purcell, Wallter <& Burns for appellant.
    
      Smith cé Smith for respondent.
   Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

All concur, except O’Brien, J., not voting, and Martin, J., not sitting.