Case ID: ohio-st-3d_119/html/1405-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "O’Donnell, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

2008-0991.
    Chojnacki v. Rogers.
   Warren App. No. CA2008-03-040. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Entry filed May 5, 2008:

“[Wlhether a decision denying a request for appointment of counsel in a reclassification hearing held pursuant to Ohio’s version of the Adam Walsh Act, Senate Bill 10, is a final appealable order.”

O’Donnell, J.,

dissents.

The conflict case is King v. State (Mar. 19, 2008), Miami App. No. 2008-CA-2.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2008-0992, Chojnacki v. Rogers, Warren App. No. CA2008-03040.