Case ID: okla_208/html/0358-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WELCH, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SCAGGS v. BARKER.
    No. 35664.
    Feb. 3, 1953.
    Rehearing Denied April 7, 1953.
    
      256 P. 2d 428.
    
    
      Wm. H. McClarin, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.
    Norman Barker, Tulsa, pro se.
   WELCH, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment on a supersedeas bond growing out of the case of DeBose v. Barker, 204 Okla. 607, 232 P. 2d 925.

A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the appeal is without merit and taken for delay only. The motion must be sustained. There was no meritorious defense presented in the trial court and no meritorious defense is suggested in the response to the motion to dismiss. In DeBose v. Barker, 207 Okla. 508, 250 P. 2d 852, we stated:

“Where, from a cursory examination of the record, the allegations made in the motion to dismiss and the response thereto it appears that the appeal is without merit, a motion to dismiss will bé sustained.

Appeal dismissed.

COEN, DAVISON, O’NEAL, WILLIAMS, and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur.