Case ID: so2d_631/html/1153-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Floyd J. RIVERE and Janice Mary Rivere v. NPC SERVICES, INC.; NUS Corporation, Exxon Corporation; the Dow Chemical Company; Ethyl Corporation; Allied Chemical Corporation; ICI Americas, Inc. (Formerly Rubicon Chemicals, Inc.); Celanese Corporation (Formerly American Hoechst Corporation; Formerly Foster Grant Company, Inc.); Uniroyal, Inc.; Copolymer Rubber and Chemical Corporation; and Shell Chemical, Inc.
    No. 93-C-2824.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Jan. 13, 1994.
    Rehearing Denied Feb. 26, 1994.
   In re Rivere, Floyd et al; Rivere, Janice Mary; — Plaintiffs); applying for writ of cer-tiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 336-561; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 92CA 1873.

Granted. The judgment of the court of appeal is reversed, summary judgment is denied, and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings. Whether NPC is the alter ego of the nine companies is a genuine issue of material fact for trial.

HALL, J., would' grant and docket for argument.

ORTIQUE, J., not on panel.