Case ID: cust-ct_1/html/0520-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dallingeb, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 40024.
    Protests 372630-G, etc., of J. E. Bernard & Co. et al. (New York).
   Opinion by

Dallingeb, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of atomizers, bottles, boxes, cream jars, droppers, toothbrush tubes, trays, powder boxes, flacons, and toilet set used chiefly for utilitarian purposes in the kitchen, household, or on the table, or hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) followed.