Case ID: f-appx_624/html/0581-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Santos Marleny VELASQUEZ DE CARCAMO, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 11-72100.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 9, 2015.
    
    Filed Dec. 15, 2015.
    Miguel Angel Olano, Miguel Olano, Attorney at Law, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.
    Gregory Darrell Mack, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
    Before: WALLACE, RAWLINSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument, See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Santos Marleny Velasquez de Carcamo, a native and citizen of El Salvador,' petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying- her motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.

In her opening brief, Velasquez de Carcamo fails to make any argument that the BIA abused its discretion in denying her motion to reconsider. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1260 (9th Cir.1996) (denying the petition for review where petitioner failed “to address how the BIA abused its discretion by denying his motion to reopen and reconsider its decision”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.