Case ID: nys_87/html/1131-10.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CULLINAN, Excise Com’r, v. BURKHARD et al.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    April 6, 1904.)
    Action by Patrick W. Cullinan, as state commissioner of excise, etc., against John F. Burkhard and another.
   PER CURIAM.

Motion to amend decision denied. Held, that this appeal, being from a judgment entered upon a verdict directed upon the application of both parties, as upon undisputed evidence, presents questions of law only, and therefore it is unnecessary for the court to insert in its decision the statement asked for to the effect that the facts have been examined and no error found herein. See 86 N. Y. Supp. 1003.