Case ID: ny_216/html/0761-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

S. Dimon Smith, Respondent, v. Dayton Hedges, Appellant. Same, Respondent, v. Same, Appellant.
    Reported below, 169 App. Div. 115.
    (Submitted January 3, 1916;
    decided January 4, 1916.)
    Motion, in each of the above-entitled actions, to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 24,1915, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff. entered upon a verdict directed by the court.
    The motions were made upon the grounds that the actions were brought to recover compensation for services; that the affirmance by the Appellate Division was unanimous; that permission to appeal had not been obtained, and that the exceptions were frivolous.
    
      Gustav Lange, Jr., for motion.
    
      John B. Vunk opposed.
   Motions denied, without costs.