Case ID: so2d_630/html/1215-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Larry WELLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-2363.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Jan. 21, 1994.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Noel A. Pelella, Asst. Public Defender, Day-tona Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s judgments and sentences which were imposed following his pleas of guilty; however, we modify the sentencing orders relative to appellant’s three convictions for attempted forgery, a misdemeanor, to delete the habitual offender designation for these offenses because a misdemeanor conviction “is not subject to enhancement under the habitual felony offender statute.” Brown v. State, 626 So.2d 297, 298 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993):

AFFIRMED as modified.

DAUKSCH, COBB and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.