Case ID: f2d_436/html/1377-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. James Alford CHATMAN, Appellant.
    No. 26120.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Feb. 2, 1971.
    Michael Korn, Van Nuys, Cal., for appellant.
    Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., David R. Nissen, Chief, Crim. Div., John W. Horn-beck, Asst. U. S. Atty., .Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
    Before MERRILL, KOELSCH and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The record manifests that the district court’s denial of Chatman’s mid-trial motion to dismiss counsel and to appoint a replacement did not constitute an abuse of discretion.

This conclusion is dispositive of the appeal.

Judgment affirmed. 
      
      . The record likewise demonstrates that counsel afforded Chatman effective legal representation.