Case ID: so2d_626/html/0324-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jon Michael LUND, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 93-439.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 16, 1993.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Avi J. Litwin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and GODERICH, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

As the State properly concedes, the sentences imposed by the trial court on Counts II, III, and V are improper since the sentences exceed the statutory maximum. See §§ 914.22(1), 843.02, 775.082(3)(d), 775.082(4), Florida Statutes (1989). The remaining points raised by the defendant lack merit. Accordingly, we reverse the defendant’s sentences as to Counts II, III, and V, and remand for resentencing consistent with this opinion.