Case ID: so2d_460/html/0591-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RICHLAND GROVE & CATTLE COMPANY, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Tom EASTERLING, Appellee.
    No. 84-1144.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Dec. 21, 1984.
    A.P. Gibbs of Gibbs, McAlvanah & Hanson, P.A., Dade City, for appellant.
    Donna Sumner Cox of Dayton, Sumner, Luckie & McKnight, P.A., Dade City, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the trial court’s adverse summary judgment. Our review of the record leads us to conclude that there has not been negated the existence of genuine issues of material fact. We therefore reverse the final summary judgment and remand this cause for further proceedings. St. Clair v. Smith, 445 So.2d 1113 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHEB and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.