Case ID: njl_102/html/0715-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Cubiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHARLES GILLMAN, RESPONDENT, v. THOMAS SORVEN-TINO, APPELLANT.
    Argued February 3, 1926
    Decided May 17, 1926.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 101 N. J. L. 447.
    For the respondent, Richard Doherty.
    
    For the appellant, Sullivan & Meehan.
    
   Pee Cubiam.

The judgment appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Mr. Justice Minturn.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.