Case ID: f-appx_6/html/0215-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nathaniel Smith THURSTON, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mickey RAY; United States Attorney, Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 01-6188.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted March 22, 2001.
    Decided March 30, 2001.
    Nathaniel Smith Thurston, Jr., pro se.
    Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel Smith Thurston, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Thurston v. Ray, No. CA-00-20-3-24BC (D.S.C. filed Jan. 11, 2001; entered Jan. 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.