Case ID: okla-crim_18/html/0708-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

B. ROSE v. STATE.
    No. 3568
    Opinion Filed Nov. 12, 1920.
    (192 Pac. 1105.)
    Appeal from County Court, Atoka County; J. M. Humphreys, Judge.
    B. Rose was convicted of a violation of the prohibitory liquor law and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. McCasland, for plaintiff in error.
    The Attorney General and W. C. Hall, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, B. Rose, was convicted on an information charging that he did have possession of intoxicating liquor witli the intention of selling the same, and was by the court sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $50. From the judgment an appeal was taken, by filing in .this court on June 12, 1919, a duly certified transcript of the record proper. No brief has been filed, and no appearance made on behalf of plaintiff in error, when the case was called for final submission.

The motion of they Attorney G-eneral to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal is therefore affirmed.