Case ID: f2d_870/html/0093-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ATLANTIC AVENUE OIL & GAS, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING INC. and Amoco Oil Company, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 889, Docket 88-9049.
    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    Argued March 13, 1989.
    Decided March 30, 1989.
    Hewitt L. Rubel, New York City (Maggin & Swan, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.
    Joseph P. Foley, White Plains, N.Y., for defendant-appellee, Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc.
    Richard R. Lutz, New York City (Michael S. Belohlavek, Mathew S. Rosengart, Townley & Updike, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee Amoco Oil Co.
    Before MESKILL and NEWMAN, Circuit Judges, and CONBOY, District Judge.
    
      
       Honorable Kenneth Conboy, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Nickerson, J., denying the motion of plaintiff-appellant Atlantic Avenue Oil & Gas, Ltd. for a preliminary injunction and dismissing its complaint.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed substantially for the reasons set out in Judge Nickerson’s opinion below, 699 F.Supp. 27 (E.D.N.Y.1988).