Case ID: sw3d_550/html/0584-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronald WARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 105871
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    Filed: July 3, 2018
    FOR APPELLANT: Kristina Starke Olson, District Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
    FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
    Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Ronald Ward appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).