Case ID: fla_117/html/0631-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bernice Crouch v. Pedro Miro, et ux.
    
    158 So. 130.
    Opinion Filed December 13, 1934.
    
      
      E. L. Bryan, for Appellant;
    
      Leroy Allen, for Appellees.
   Per Curiam.

The appeal in this case is from final decree in -a mortgage foreclosure suit in which the defendant interposed the defense of usury.

The defense was sustained by the terms of the final decree and deductions made accordingly.

The assignments of error challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the decree. There is substantial evidence to; support the decree and, therefore, the same will not be disturbed by the appellate court.

Decree affirmed.

So ordered.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.