Case ID: f-appx_677/html/0347-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Martin MIRANDA-BUERAS, a.k.a. Luis Bueras-Miranda, a.k.a. Luis Miranda-Bueras, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-10027
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted February 10, 2017
    
    Filed February 14, 2017
    Christina Marie Cabanillas, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USTU—Office of the US Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee
    Luis Martin Miranda-Bueras, Pro Se
    Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Luis Martin Miranda-Bueras appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his conviction and 25-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(D). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Miranda-Bu-eras’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Miranda-Bueras the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Miranda-Bueras has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.