Case ID: nj-eq_107/html/0505-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Viola Aguero, appellant, v. Alonzo Aguero, respondent.
    [Submitted October term, 1930.
    Decided February 2d, 1931.]
    
      Messrs. Coolc & Stout, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Ward Kremer, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The appellant was the petitioner in the court below seeking a divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. The bill was dismissed and the present appeal resulted.

Our examination of the case and of the grounds of appeal discloses that a question of fact only was presented by the proofs, and we cannot say that the conclusion reached by the learned vice-chancellor was erroneous.

The decree is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.