Case ID: f-appx_197/html/0320-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Darryl HENRY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-51537.
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Decided Aug. 30, 2006.
    Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Eva-Marie Elisabeth Leahey, Leahey Law Offices, Odessa, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Darryl Henry appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction of aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute cocaine base. He argues that the district court erred by denying him an offense level reduction based on his acceptance of responsibility, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1.

This court has previously rejected the argument that because a defendant meets other criteria for acceptance of responsibility he is entitled to a § 3E1.1 reduction despite his use of illicit drugs while on release. See United States v. Flucas, 99 F.3d 177, 180 (5th Cir.1996); United States v. Rickett, 89 F.3d 224, 227 (5th Cir.1996). In this case, the district court’s ruling was based on Henry’s continued drug use, as evidenced by urine test results. Additionally, the district court found that Henry’s denials regarding his continued drug use were not credible. Given these facts, it cannot be said that the district court’s ruling is without foundation. See United States v. Washington, 340 F.3d 222, 227 (5th Cir.2003). Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.