Case ID: f3d_898/html/0818-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MINNESOTA MAJORITY, Plaintiff
    Minnesota Voters Alliance; Minnesota Northstar Tea Party Patriots; Election Integrity Watch; Susan Jeffers, individually and as an election judge; Dan McGrath; Andy Cilek Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Joe MANSKY, in his official capacity as the Elections Manager for Ramsey County; Virginia Gelms, in her individual and official capacity as the Elections Manager for Hennepin County; Mike Freeman, in his official capacity as Hennepin County Attorney; John Choi, in his official capacity as Ramsey County Attorney ; Steve Simon, in his official capacity as Secretary of State Defendants-Appellees
    Minnesota Majority Plaintiff
    Minnesota Voters Alliance; Minnesota Northstar Tea Party Patriots; Election Integrity Watch; Susan Jeffers, individually and as an election judge; Dan McGrath; Andy Cilek Plaintiffs-Appellees v. Joe Mansky, in his official capacity as the Elections Manager for Ramsey County; Virginia Gelms, in her individual and official capacity as the Elections Manager for Hennepin County; Mike Freeman, in his official capacity as Hennepin County Attorney; John Choi, in his official capacity as Ramsey County Attorney Defendants
    Steve Simon, in his official capacity as Secretary of State Defendant-Appellant
    No. 15-1682 No. 15-1741
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 18, 2018 Filed: August 3, 2018
   PER CURIAM.

This case is on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1876, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2018). In 2010, several organizations and individuals sued the Minnesota Secretary of State and Ramsey and Hennepin county election officials, attacking a statute prohibiting the wearing of political insignia inside a polling place. This court reversed dismissal of the defendants' as-applied First Amendment claim. Minnesota Majority v. Mansky , 708 F.3d 1051, 1059 (8th Cir. 2013). On remand, the district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. This court affirmed, holding that the statute, as applied, did not violate the First Amendment. Minnesota Majority v. Mansky , 849 F.3d 749, 753 (8th Cir. 2017). The Supreme Court reversed and remanded, holding that the statute violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. Mansky , 138 S.Ct. at 1891-92.

In light of the Supreme Court's decision in Mansky , this court reverses the grant of summary judgment for the defendants.

The case is remanded to the district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.