Case ID: so2d_886/html/0319-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Angel E. ZAVALA, Appellant, v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, etc., et al., Appellees.
    No. 3D03-3276.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 10, 2004.
    Angel E. Zavala, in proper person.
    John D. Maher (Tallahassee), for appel-lees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and WELLS, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The decision below denying unemployment compensation benefits is reversed because the conduct complained of did not, as a matter of law, amount to disqualifying “misconduct.” § 443.036(29), Fla. Stat. (2003); Castillo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 785 So.2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). After remand, the appellant shall be awarded the benefits claimed.