Case ID: so2d_447/html/0346-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John MARSHALL and Marion County, Florida, Petitioners, v. The Honorable Carven D. ANGEL, as Circuit Judge of the Fifth Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida; Freeman Keyes; Ocala Stud, Inc.; Leonard H. Lavin and his wife, Berniece E. Lavin; and Red Oak Farm, Inc., Respondents.
    No. 83-1745.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    March 1, 1984.
    Rehearing Denied March 26, 1984.
    Michael Milbrath, County Atty., and John P. McKeever of Pattillo & McKeever, P.A., Ocala, for petitioners.
    Willard Ayres of Ayres, Cluster, Curry, McCall & Briggs, P.A., Ocala, for respondents Ocala Stud, Inc., Leonard H. Lavin and his wife Berniece E. Lavin.
    James A. Cornelius of O’Neill, Cornelius & Cohen, P.A., Ocala, for respondent Freeman Keyes.
    Irwin J. Weiner, Ocala, for respondent. Red Oak Farm, Inc.
   PER CURIAM.

Petitioners, Marion County and John Marshall, seek a writ of prohibition. Because we find that the trial court had jurisdiction over the subject matter of the cause below, we deem prohibition to be an improper remedy. See Moore v. Leisure Pool Service, Inc., 412 So.2d 392 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); School Board of Marion County v. Angel, 404 So.2d 359 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

Certiorari review pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(b)(2)(A), which might otherwise have been available, is precluded here due to petitioners’ failure to comply with the thirty-day requirement of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(c).

Accordingly, the Petition for Writ of Prohibition is

DENIED.

DAUKSCH, COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.