Case ID: ohio-st_172/html/0135-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Grahl, Appellee, v. Matthews, Appellant.
    (No. 36778
    Decided April 19, 1961.)
    
      
      Messrs. Kilbourne $ Twynham, for appellee.
    
      Messrs. Wiles, Boucher, Tressler é Koons, for appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The defendant did not permit judgment to be taken against her or refuse to plead further. The sustaining of the motion to strike a part of the amended answer, considering such motion as a demurrer, leaves the cause still pending in the trial court. The order of the trial court, considering the motion to strike the second defense from the amended answer as a demurrer and sustaining it, is not a final order from which an appeal may be taken. Holbrook, Admr., v. Connelly, 6 Ohio St., 199.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Herbert, J., not participating.