Case ID: nj_61/html/0578-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CAROL J. DIXON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FRANCIS J. DIXON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Decided December 4, 1972.
    
      Mr. Francis J. Dixon, a member of the New York bar, filed a brief pro se.
    
    
      Mr. Robert A. Pennachio filed a brief for respondent (Messrs. Draesel, Breitenstein & Pennachio, attorneys).
   Per Curiam.

There being no appeal as of right in this matter and the Court having considered the filed papers as a petition for certification, the Court will dismiss this matter as presenting no substantial issue.

For dismissal — Chief Justice Weintraub, Justices Jacobs, Hall and Mountain, and Judges Conford, Sullivan and Lewis — 7.

Opposed — None.