Case ID: f-appx_403/html/0877-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David ATKINS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Khairul B. EMRAM, Doctor; Samuel V. Pruett, Warden; Harvard W. Stephens, O.H.S. Medical Director; Linda Shear, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 10-6915.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 30, 2010.
    Decided: Dec. 7, 2010.
    David Atkins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kathryn Anne Grace, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, McLean, Virginia; John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Atkins, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible eiTor. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Atkins v. Emram, No. 1:09-cv-00839-LMB-IDD, 2010 WL 2490965 (E.D. Va. June 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.