Case ID: md_138/html/0176-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Urner,, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GORDON H. FOOKS et al. vs. MAMIE C. BAILEY et al.
    
      Decided March 3rd, 1921.
    
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for Wicomico- County, In Equity (Bailey, J.).
    The cause was argued, tog'ether with that next preceding*, before Boyd, C. J., Briscoe, Thomas, Brner, Adkins, and Oeeutt, JJ.
    
      Woodcodc & Webb, submitting* the cause on brief, for- the appellants.
    
      James E. Ellegood, with whom were Ellegood, Frainey & Wades on the brief, for the appellees.
   Urner,, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This appeal presents the same questions of jurisdiction and title as those decided in the case of Herman I. Powell v. Mamie C. Bailey and others, being No. 83 on the docket of this term. The two appeals were from the same order and were brought before us and heard together on the same record. For the reasons stated in the opinion just filed in No. 33 the order- of the court below will be affirmed also with respect to the present appeal.

Order affirmed, the costs in this Cowt to be paid equally by the appellants and the appellees, and the costs in the Oourt below to be paid out of the proceeds of sale as provided by the order of that Oourt.