Case ID: ga-app_28/html/0313-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Luke, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

13070.
    Evans v. Smith.
    Decided March 7, 1922.
    Attachment; from city court of Eloyd county — Judge Nunnally. September 27, 1921.
    
      James Maddox, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Willingham, Wright & Covington, contra.
   Luke, J.

1. A declaration filed upon an attachment will proceed as at common law, although the attachment itself and the levy made thereunder be dismissed. See Busby v. Elliott, 22 Ga. App. 392 (95 S. E. 1014).

2. The evidence demanded a verdict for the plaintiff, and it was not error for the court to direct the jury to find such a verdict. The several assignments of error are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J, and Bloodworth, J., concur.