Case ID: ny_251/html/0551-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      \n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William J. Byrnes, Appellant, v. Chase National Bank et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others.
    (Argued May 29, 1929;
    decided June 13, 1929.)
    
      L. Barton Case for appellant.
    
      George N. Hamlin for Chase National Bank et al., respondents.
    
      John L. Bigelow for Ernest L. Conant et al., appearing specially.
   Per Curiam.

No appeal having been taken to the Appellate Division from the judgment of the trial court dismissing the complaint as to the defendants Conant and Elliman, the question of the liability of said defendants is not before this court, and they have been erroneously designated as respondents on this appeal.

The judgment of the Appellate Division dismissing the complaint as to the defendants other than Conant and Elliman, should be affirmed with costs.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur; Hubbs, J., not sitting.

Judgment accordingly.