Case ID: f-appx_697/html/0152-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christian Philip PARKER, a/k/a Armani, a/k/a Super P, a/k/a Sup, a/k/a King, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 17-6775
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: August 24, 2017
    Decided: August 29, 2017
    Christian Philip Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Alexander, Mysti Dawn De-gani, Brian David Harrison, Scott Butler Nussbum, Katherine Rumbaugh, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Mary Katherine Barr Daly, Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Karen Ledbetter Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christian Philip Parker appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s prior order granting Parker’s motion for a sentence reduction pursuant . to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012), in which Parker sought a further sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. May, 855 F.3d 271, 274 (4th Cir. 2017) (noting that prohibition on a district court’s consideration of a motion to reconsider a § 3582 order is not jurisdictional and is waived if not invoked by the government). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED