Case ID: ny-st-rep_70/html/0883-18.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      _ Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Emily A. Emerson, App’lt, v. Jessie M. Emerson, Resp’t.
    Sup. Ct., 1 D.
    November 15, 1895.
    Appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for an allowance for counsel fees, to resist a motion made by defendant for a reduction of alimony.
    
      Edward G. Black, for app’lt; Charles J. Hardy, for resp’t.
   _ Per Curiam.

Even if the court could entertain this motion, our examina_ tion of the record leads to the conclusion that the discretion of the special term was not improperly exercised in refusing to allow a counsel fee to the plaintiff, to he employed in securing counsel to oppose defendant’s motion. The order should he affirmed, with $10 costs and printing disbursements.