Case ID: f-appx_88/html/0262-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Timothy BUFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LEWIS, Dr.; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 02-17034.
    D.C. No. CV-00-02631-CRB.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 17, 2004.
    
    Decided Feb. 25, 2004.
    Timothy Buford, pro se, Wasco State Prison, Wasco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    No appearance, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before FERNANDEZ, W. FLETCHER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

California state prisoner Timothy Buford appeals pro se the denial of his motion to vacate the judgment following the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to vacate, Sch. Dist. No. 1J v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir.1993), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion to vacate the judgment because Buford failed to show that he was entitled to relief from judgment on any of the grounds enumerated in Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). See American Ironworks & Erectors, Inc. v. North American, 248 F.3d 892, 899 (9th Cir.2001).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.