Case ID: or-app_32/html/0175-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued December 20, 1977,
    affirmed January 16,
    reconsideration denied February 23,
    petition for review denied March 28, 1978
    In the Matter of the Marriage of McMULLEN, Respondent—Cross-Appellant, and McMULLEN, Appellant—Cross-Respondent.
    (No. 76-1725, CA 8832)
    573 P2d 1
    Donald A. Bick, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant — cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Bick & Monte, Eugene.
    Eric Haws, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent — cross-appellant. With him on the briefs was Bradley & Haws, Eugene.
    Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Lee and Roberts, Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. No costs to either party. Niedert and Niedert, 28 Or App 309, 559 P2d 515, rev den (1977).