Case ID: nc_328/html/0564-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROY DUDLEY SMITH v. JAMES ALBERT BOHLEN and BETTY LOU HOLMQUIST BOHLEN
    No. 410A89
    (Filed 3 April 1991)
    Appeal by plaintiff pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30 from a decision by a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 95 N.C. App. 347, 382 S.E.2d 812 (1989), finding no error in the judgment and verdict entered by Morgan, J., at the 11 April 1988 Session of Superior Court, GUILFORD County. Heard in the Supreme Court 15 March 1990.
    
      Smith, Patterson, Follín, Curtis, James, Harkavy & Lawrence, by Michael F. Curtis, for plaintiff-appellant.
    
    
      Frazier, Frazier & Mahler, by Robert A. Franklin and James D. McKinney, for defendant-appellees.
    
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.