Case ID: f-appx_197/html/0520-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Algie R. NEAL, Appellant, v. ENIVA CORPORATION, Appellee.
    No. 05-3305.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 7, 2006.
    Filed: Sept. 22, 2006.
    Algie R. Neal, Chanhassen, MN, pro se.
    David P. Jendrzejek, J. Vincent Stevens, Moss & Barnett, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellee.
    Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Algie Neal appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment in his Title VII suit claiming race discrimination against his former employer, Eniva Corporation. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002) (de novo standard of review), we find the district court’s analysis to be correct, thorough, and well-reasoned. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.