Case ID: sd_54/html/0481-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE, Respondent, v. MORSE, et al, Appellants.
    (223 N. W. 600.)
    (File No. 6657.
    Opinion filed February 21, 1929.)
    
      Kelley & Luby, of Huron, for Appellants.
    
      Buell F. Jones, Attorney General Donald B. Montgomery, Assistant Attorney General, and William A. Marble, State’s Attorney, of Emery, for the State.
   PER CURIAM.

Defendants were informed against and convicted of the crime of robbery, the defense being in the nature of an alibi. From the judgment and an order denying their motion for a new trial, they have appealed.

The sole question presented by the appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence, which was conflicting. The testimony introduced by the state, if believed by the jury, furnishes ample support for the verdict.

The judgment and order appeal from are therefore affirmed.

M'ISER, C., sitting in lieu of BROWN, J., absent.