Case ID: f-appx_120/html/0520-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jamal MITCHELL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Vincent B. LISSI, individually, and in his official capacity as an agent or employee of the Federal Bureau of Investigations; John C. Bevington, individually, and in his official capacity as an agent or employee of the Federal Bureau of Investigations, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 04-7565.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 9, 2005.
    Decided Feb. 15, 2005.
    Jamal Mitchell, Appellant pro se. Patrick Bernard Kernan, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM.

Jamal Mitchell appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mitchell v. Lissi, No. CA-03-1190-1 (E.D.Va. Aug. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED