Case ID: so2d_212/html/0664-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Milton S. LUBARR, D. D. S., Appellant, v. Samuel WALDMAN et al., Appellees.
    No. 67-980.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    July 30, 1968.
    Talianoff, Waller & Berger, Miami Beach, for appellant.
    Tobias Simon and Beverly Gurevitz, Miami, for appellees.
    Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal and considered the briefs and arguments of counsel. We have concluded therefrom that, notwithstanding the court’s failure to consider the evidence in the light of § 55.56, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., then in effect, defendant’s evidence was sufficient to support the court’s finding in his favor. State Plant Board v. Smith, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 401; Richards v. Samuel, Fla.App.1966, 184 So.2d 516. We further hold that appellant’s remaining points are without substantial merit. Central Hardware Co. v. Stampler, Fla.App.1965, 180 So.2d 205.

No harmful error having been made to appear, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed. 
      
      . Section 56.29(6), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., 1967 Revision.