Case ID: ny-super-ct_51/html/0536-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Otto Geisenheim, et al., respondents, v. Charles C. Dodge, et al., appellants.
    Decided December 8, 1884.
    Appeal from judgment.
    Dill & Chandler, for appellants.
    Baldwin & Blackmar, for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

None of the appellants’ exceptions are well taken. The judgment is right, and must be affirmed with costs, on the opinion of the referee, which correctly disposed of the questions involved. Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., Van Vorst and Freedman, JJ. (See ante, p. 169).