Case ID: misc2d_23/html/0892-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lane Realty Company, a Copartnership Composed of Louis W. Licht, and Another, Respondents, v. Robert F. Fox et al., Appellants.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    January 29, 1960.
    
      Esterman <& Reich (Philip Esterman of counsel), for appellants. Sparago & Sparago (William Sparago of counsel), for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

In this action for brokerage commissions, it was error to exclude parol evidence to show that the binder agreement was conditional (N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinley, 246 N. Y. 40).

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts and a new trial granted, with $30 costs to the defendants to abide the event.

Concur — Hart, Di Giovanna and Brown, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.