Case ID: f-appx_670/html/0239-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Hipolito SEGURA-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant
    No. 15-50337 Summary Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Date Filed: 10/26/2016
    Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Diane D. Kirstein, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Raymond Meza, Jr., Esq., Counsel, Law Office of Ray Meza, Jr., Del Rio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant
    Before JOLLY, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Hipólito Segura-Sanchez appeals the 12-month sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release on the grounds that it is procedurally and substantively unreasonable. Review is for plain error because Segura-Sanchez did not object. See United States v. Whitelaw, 580 F.3d 256, 259-60 (5th Cir. 2009).

Segura-Sanchez fails to demonstrate any error, plain or otherwise. A district court does not procedurally err by weighing some 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors more heavily than others. See United States v. Hernandez, 633 F.3d 370, 375-76 (5th Cir. 2011). His argument fails to rebut the presumption of reasonableness that applies to his consecutive, within-guidelines sentence. See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 809 (5th Cir. 2008); United States v. Candia, 454 F.3d 468, 473 (5th Cir. 2006); U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(f) & cmt. n.4.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.