Case ID: ga-app_28/html/0442-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

13214.
    Jackson v. The State.
    Decided April 11, 1922.
    Indictment for robbery; from Bibb superior court — Judge Malcolm D. Jones. December 10, 1921.
    
      Hubert F. Rawls, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Charles H. Garrett, solicitor-general, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

There is no merit in any of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial. There is ample evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and this court will not interfere. -Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.