Case ID: sw2d_832/html/0026-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re the MARRIAGE OF Mary Victoria ABSHER and Charles Don Absher. Mary Victoria ABSHER, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Charles Don ABSHER, Respondent/Appellant.
    No. 60691.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    June 30, 1992.
    John L. Oliver, Jr., Michael J. Ponder, Oliver, Oliver, Waltz & Cook, Cape Girar-deau, for respondent/appellant.
    Lenzie L. Leftridge, Flat River, for petitioner/respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order awarding wife maintenance and attorney’s fees pendente lite in a dissolution case. The trial court’s order is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo.banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principals of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).