Case ID: us_215/html/0582-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RAND, McNALLY & CO. v. KENTUCKY.
    ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY.
    No. 136.
    Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 18, 1909.
    Decided November 1, 1909.
    A judgment of the state court affirmed without opinion on authority of previous decisions.
    32 Ky. Law Rep. 1168, affirmed.
    
      
      Mr. Amos C. Miller and Mr. Wm. M. Beckner for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Mr. Frederick S. Tyler and Mr. James C. Sims for defendant in error.
   Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Chanute v. Trader, 132 U. S. 210; Wilson v. North Carolina, 169 U. S. 586; Central Land Co. v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103; Bacon v. Texas, 163 U. S. 207; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; White v. Leovy, 134 U. S. 91; Electric Co. v. Dow, 166 U. S. 489; Pierce v. Somerset Railway, 171 U. S. 641; Shepard v. Barron, 194 U. S. 553; Rand, McNally & Co. v. Commonwealth, 106 S. W. Rep. 238; S. C., 108 S. W. Rep. 892, 32 Ky. Law Rep. 441, 1168; Commonwealth v. Ginn & Co., 111 Kentucky, 110.