Case ID: nys_26/html/1135-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MCCARTHY, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HAINES, Respondent, v. THOMPSON et al., Appellants.
    (City Court of New York, General Term.
    December 8, 1893.)
    Action by Annie Haines against Denman Thompson and George W. Ryer.
    Argued before EHRLICH, C. J., and MCCARTHY, J.
    Browne & Sheehan, for appellants.
    Dittenhoefer, Gerber & James, for respondent.
   MCCARTHY, J.

We have examined the evidence very carefully, and •find no errors. It involved a question of fact, which was properly and fairly presented to the jury by the trial justice. The jury found for the plaintiff, .and there was sufficient evidence upon which to base their verdict. Judgment should therefore be affirmed, with costs.