Case ID: nys_98/html/1113-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PERLSTEIN, Respondent, v. HELMAN, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    March 9, 1906.)
    Action by Myer S. Perlstein against Bertha Helman.
   PER CURIAM.

The acceptance of the reduced basement would be a consideration for the reduction of the rent, and it was a question of fact for the jury whether the agreement of reduction on that consideration was made. Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.