Case ID: f-appx_164/html/0963-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eileen HAMALL-DESAI, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.
    No. 05-11869.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Feb. 2, 2006.
    Pamela llene Atkins, Galler & Atkins, LLC, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-AppelleeCross-Appellant.
    Joshua Bachrach, Rawle & Henderson, Philadelphia, PA, Alfred L. Evans, III, Austin & Sparks, P.C., Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.
    Before BLACK, HULL and FARRIS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       Honorable Jerome Farris, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM:

AFFIRMED. See 11th Cir. R. 36-1. 
      
      . 11th Cir. R. 36-1 provides:
      When the court determines that any of the following circumstances exist:
      (a) judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous;
      (b) the evidence in support of a jury verdict is sufficient; (c) the order of an administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole;
      (d) summary judgment, directed verdict, or judgment on the pleadings is supported by the record;
      (e) judgment has been entered without a reversible error of law; and an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment or order may be affirmed or enforced without opinion.