Case ID: sw3d_485/html/0390-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM'", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Derrick BARNES, Appellant.
    No. ED 102908
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    
    FILED: March 29, 2016
    
      Kristina Starke Olson, 1010 Market St., Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Christine Lesicko, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM'

Appellant Derrick Barnes (“Barnes”) was convicted of one count of first-degree robbery and one count of armed criminal action after a bench trial. On appeal, Barnes argues the trial court clearly erred in overruling his motion to suppress Victim’s identification of Barnes in a pretrial photographic (“photo”) lineup, a pretrial physical lineup, and at trial. Barnes contends the pretrial lineups were impermissi-bly suggestive and unreliable, rendering Victim’s resulting identifications inadmissible. Because neither pretrial lineup was impermissibly suggestive, the trial court did not clearly err in denying Barnes’s motion to suppress.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).