Case ID: utah_102/html/0534-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WOLFE, Chief Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Maude O’GORMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant v. UTAH REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO., a corporation, Roy Chapman, Ruth Hampton and Eli Hampton, Defendants and Respondents.
    No. 6456.
    Decided January 20, 1943.
    (133 P. 2d 318.)
    For former opinion, see 102 Utah 523; 129 Pac. 2d 981.
    
      C. E. Norton, of Salt Lake City, for appellant.
    
      Ball & Musser, E. F. Richards, and Romney, Faux & Boyer, all of Salt Lake City, for respondents.
   WOLFE, Chief Justice.

On petition for rehearing our attention is called to the fact that we reversed this cause as to all the defendants. Since our opinion 102 Utah 523, 129 P. 2d 981, discloses that there were no errors in the judgment of the lower court as to the defendants Utah Realty and Construction Company and Roy Chapman, the judgment as to them should stand. Therefore, our order should-be modified to read as follows: “for the reason that the findings do not support the judgment on the counterclaim, the cause is reversed with instructions to grant a new trial as between plaintiff O’Gorman and Ruth and Eli Hampton. As to the issues raised between plaintiff and Utah Realty and Construction Company and Roy Chapman, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.”'

With this modification, the petition for rehearing is. denied.

LARSON, McDONOUGH, and MOFFAT, JJ., concur.

WADE, J., votes to grant a rehearing.