Case ID: nj-eq_131/html/0474-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sol Levin, appellant, v. Nathan Levine, respondent.
    [Decided April 23d, 1942.]
    
      Messrs. Thompson & Lloyd (Mr. John Lloyd, Jr., of counsel), for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Edward I. Feinberg, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Sooy, and reported at ISO N. J. Eg. 1^59.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justioe, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Raeeertv, Thompson, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.