Case ID: br_308/html/0041-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Barrett L. CRAWFORD, Trustee — Appellant, v. John Robert MULLINS, Defendant— Appellee.
    No. 03-2242.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 27, 2004.
    Decided March 19, 2004.
    Richard M. Mitchell, Mitchell, Railings, Singer, McGirt & Tissue, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. John Roberts Mullins, Appellee pro se.
    Before WILLIAMS, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Barrett L. Crawford, the bankruptcy trustee in John Robert Mullins’ Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting in part motions to quash subpoenas issued by Crawford to three law firms seeking the production of documents from the law firms related to the firms’ representation of Mullins or any communications between Mullins and the law firms. We have reviewed the record and lower courts’ opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Crawford v. Mullins, Nos. CA-03-12-5-V, BK-98-50517, AP-00-5013 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED