Case ID: okla-crim_8/html/0496-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "ARMSTRONG, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WILL MOORE v. STATE.
    No. A-1489.
    Opinion Filed January 13, 1913.
    (129 Pac. 71.)
    APPEAL AND ERROR — Review—Scope and Extent. When an appeal is taken to this court by a person convicted of violating the criminal laws of this state, and no brief is filed on his behalf, and no appearance made for oral argument, this court will examine the record for fundamental errors only, and, if none be disclosed, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.
    (Syllabus by the Court.)
    
      Appeal from Murray County Court; Harry W. Fielding, Judge.
    
    Will Moore was convicted of violating the prohibitory law, and appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      Emanuel & Broad-bent, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Smith C. Matson and E. G. Spilman, Asst. Attys. Gen., for the State.
   ARMSTRONG, J.

The plaintiff in error, Will Moore, was convicted in the county court of Murray county on a charge of having in his possession, intoxicating liquors for the purpose of selling the same, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days and a fine of $75. We have carefully examined the record and find no error sufficient to justify a reversal of the judgment. No brief was filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error, and no appearance made for oral argument.

This court examined the record for fundamental errors only, and, finding none, the judgment is affirmed; with direction to the trial court to enforce the judgment and sentence.

FURMAN, P. J., and DOYLE, J., concur.