Case ID: f_35/html/0224-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Blatchford, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Union Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. The Bridgeport and The William Burrows. Potts et al. v. Same.
    
      (Circuit Court, E. D. New York.
    
    July 5, 1888.)
    In Admiralty. On appeal from district court, ante, 222.
    
      Sydney Chubb, for Potts.
    
      Carpenter & Mosher, for the insurance company.
    
      Benedict, Taft & Benedict, for the Bridgeport.
    
      Edwin G. Davis, for the Burrows.
   Blatchford, Justice.

'I concur with the district judge in his views and conclusions in his decision in these cases. In the first-entitled case let there be a decree for the libelant for $700, with interest from December 24,1883, and its costs in the district court, taxed at $71.24, and its costs in this court, to be taxed, against the steam-tug; and a decree dismissing the libel as against the steam-boat, with costs to her claimant in the district court, against the libelant, taxed at$48.03, and its costs in this court, against the libelant, to be taxed. In the second-entitled case, let there be a decree for the libelants for $469.05, with interest from October 1, 1883, and their costs in the district court, taxed at $76.13, and their costs in this court, to be taxed, against the steam-tug; and a decree dismissing the libel as against the steam-boat, with costs to her claimant, in the district court, against the libelants, taxed at $57.11, and its costs in this court, against the libelants, to be taxed.