Case ID: f3d_121/html/0168-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sandra Jean Dale BOGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas F. BOGGS, Harry M. Boggs and David B. Boggs, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 94-30178.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Aug. 20, 1997.
    Marian M. Livaudais, Livaudais & Livaudais, Mandeville, LA, James F. Willeford, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Susan Rees, Plan Benefits Security Division, N-4611, Office of Solicitor, U.S. Dept, of Labor, Washington, DC, for Dept, of Labor, Amicus Curiae.
    Thomas F. Boggs, Monroe, LA, Pro Se.
    Guy L. Deano, Jr., Deano & Deano, Mandeville, LA, for Harry Boggs & David Boggs.
    Before WISDOM, KING and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The district court’s order granting summary judgment in the above-styled action is VACATED. The case is REMANDED to the district court for proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s pronouncement in Boggs v. Boggs, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 1754, 138 L.Ed.2d 45 (1997).