Case ID: f_75/html/0001-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "TOWNSEND, District Judge", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LANGERMAN & PETTY v. UNITED STATES.
    (Circuit Court, S. D. New York.
    April 9, 1896.)
    • '.is.Duties — Ouassiitcatton—Zmc Kiikjcts.
    _ , ' ’■’'‘ifp'ap.hic zinc sheets,” commercially so known, being sheets of zinc 1 nit , . Il« f.m'é'írom the rolling mill, but coated on one side with a_preparation suiting them for use by lithographers, were dutiable as “zinc in ' fleets,” under paragraph 213 of the act of 1890, and not as manufactures u )t specially provided for, under paragraph 215.
    This • 'as an application by Langerman & Petty, importers, for a review of a decision of the board of general appraisers, sustaining the collector’s classification for duty of certain merchandise imported under the act of October 1, 1890.
    Albert Comstock, for importers. .
    Henry D. Sedgwick, Asst. TJ. fá. Atty.
   TOWNSEND, District Judge