Case ID: f-supp-2d_203/html/1379-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re AIR CRASH AT BELLE HARBOR, NEW YORK, ON NOVEMBER 12, 2001.
    No. 1448.
    Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
    April 22, 2002.
    
      BEFORE: WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman, JOHN F. KEENAN, MOREY L. SEAR, BRUCE M. SELYA, JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, D. LOWELL JENSEN and J. FREDERICK MOTZ, Judges of the Panel.
   TRANSFER ORDER

This litigation currently consists of the 33 actions listed on the attached Schedule A and pending in four federal districts as follows: 21 actions in the Eastern District of New York, six actions in the Northern District of Texas, five actions in the Southern District of New York, and one action in the Central District of California. Before the Panel are three motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings of the actions in this litigation. All movants and respondents support centralization, but they differ on the choice of transferee district.

Common defendants AMR Corporation and American Airlines, Inc. (American Airlines) move the Panel to transfer the actions to the Eastern District of New York. Plaintiffs in two Eastern District of New York actions support transfer to that district. Eight plaintiffs in five Southern District of New York actions move the Panel to transfer the actions either to the Eastern District or to the Southern District of New York. Plaintiffs in 22 actions, thirteen in the Southern District and nine in the Eastern District, support transfer to either of these New York districts. Plaintiff in one Eastern District of New York action also supports transfer to either New York district, but strongly prefers transfer to the Southern District of New York. Plaintiffs in five Northern District of Texas actions move for transfer to that district. Plaintiffs in eight potential tag-along actions in the Northern District of Texas also support transfer to that district.

On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, the Panel finds that the 33 actions in this litigation involve common questions of fact, and that centralization under Section 1407 in the Southern District of New York will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. All actions concern the cause or causes of the crash of American Airlines Flight 587 on November 12, 2001. Centralization under Section 1407 is thus necessary in order to eliminate duplicative discovery, prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings, and conserve the resources of the parties, their counsel, and the judiciary.

We are persuaded that the Southern District of New York is the appropriate transferee forum for this docket. We note that i) given the origination of Flight 587 at John F. Kennedy International Airport and the situs of the crash in Belle Harbor, New York, many witnesses and documents will likely be found in the New York metropolitan area; ii) of the 79 known federal court actions arising from the Flight 587 crash, 24 are pending in the Southern District of New York; iii) the Southern District of New York courthouse in Manhattan provides a convenient and accessible forum for participants in the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings; and iv) the judge to whom we are assigning this litigation has pertinent experience in complex air crash litigation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, the actions listed on the attached Schedule A and pending outside the Southern District of New York are transferred to the Southern District of New York and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Robert W. Sweet for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions listed on Schedule A and pending in that district.

SCHEDULE A

MDL-1448—In re Air Crash at Belle Harbor, New York, on November 12, 2001

Central District of California
Moses Perez De Los Santos, et al. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:01-10120
Eastern District of New York
Ruth Restituyo, etc. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:01-7885
Juan Francisco Bello, etc. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:01-7886
Michael Morley, Jr., et al. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:01-7969
Patricia Elise Mills, etc. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:01-8105
Candida Urena, etc. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:01-8210
Johanne Phanord, etc. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:01-8258
Esther Rodriguez, etc. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:01-8295
Norma Patricia Camac Rodriguez Jimenez, etc. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:01-8529
America Martinez, etc. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:01-8585
Auriacelis Matías, etc. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:01-8586
Rafael Leonardo Alvarez, etc. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:01— 8587
Ana Maria Mena, etc. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:01-8588
Gladys Moralez, etc. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:02-63
Augustina Sarita, etc. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:02-146
Carlos Fernandez, etc. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:02-147
Gabriel Arias, etc. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:02-148
Patricia A. Rosa, etc. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:02-149
Mia Lutz, et al. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:02-302
Yoselin Aurora Estepan de Peralta, etc. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:02-366
Yoselin Aurora Estepan de Peralta, etc. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:02-367
Fabrizio Oskar Carry, et al. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:02-394
Southern District of New York
Margarita del Carmen Montan, etc. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:02-439
Celso Cedeno, etc. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:02-614
Manuel Antonio Ventura, et al. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:02-615
Juan Bautista Abreu, et al. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:02-616
Wendy Araujo, et al. v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:02-617
Northern District of Texas
Jose D. Almonte v. American Airlines, Inc., C.A. No. 3:02-24
Milagros Guillermo Cabrera v. American Airlines, Inc., C.A. No. 3:02-25
Mayra Altagracia Abad, etc. v. American Airlines, Inc., C.A. No. 3:02-44
Rafael Emilio Cuello, et al. v. American Airlines, Inc., C.A. No. 3:02-83
Jose F. Concepcion, et al. v. American Airlines, Inc., C.A. No. 3:02-84
Franhlyn Hernandez, etc. v. American Airlines, Inc., C.A. No. 3:02-85 
      
      . In addition to the 33 actions presently before the Panel, the Panel has been notified of 46 related actions pending in federal courts as follows: nineteen actions in the Southern District of New York, fourteen actions in the Eastern District of New York, ten actions in the Northern District of Texas, and one action each in the Southern District of Florida, the District of Puerto Rico and the District of Rhode Island. These actions and any other related actions will be treated as potential tag-along actions. See Rules 7.4 and 7.5, R.P.J.P.M.L., 199 F.R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001).