Case ID: so2d_692/html/0293-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Javier ODIO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 96-3002.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 30, 1997.
    Sharpstein & Sharpstein and Ada Manzano Avallone, Miami, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Lara J. Edelstein, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before LEVY, GREEN and SHEVIN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Whren v. United States, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1769, 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996); State v. Holland, 680 So.2d 1041 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), review granted, 689 So.2d 1069 (Fla. 1997); State v. Corvin, 677 So.2d 947 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Petrel v. State, 675 So.2d 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). See generally Saturnino-Boudet v. State, 682 So.2d 188, 191 n. 5 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)(noting District Courts of Appeal’s observation that Whren has substantially altered search and seizure jurisprudence as it pertains to traffic stops), review dismissed, 689 So.2d 1071 (Fla.1997).