Case ID: ad2d_220/html/0362-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Domingo Rexach, Appellant.
    [633 NYS2d 131]
   —Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Diaz, J.), rendered December 13, 1993, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 41/2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

We reject defendant’s claim that he was improperly adjudicated a second felony offender because his prior Federal conviction for distributing cocaine within 1,000 feet of a public school was based on a statute (21 USC § 841 [a] [1]; former § 845a [a], now § 860 [a]) that is broader than its New York counterpart criminalizing the sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds (Penal Law §§ 220.44, 220.00 [14]). This Court has specifically declined to accept the argument that 21 USC § 841 (a) (1) may not be used to enhance sentence because its requirement of "distribution” is not analogous to the State’s requirement of a "sale” (People v Vasquez, 167 AD2d 236, Iv denied 77 NY2d 912), or because, unlike its New York "sale” counterparts, it is not subject to the defense of agency (People v Pinella, 137 Misc 2d 701, affd 143 AD2d 1072, Iv denied 73 NY2d 925). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Williams, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.