Case ID: cust-ct_1/html/0372-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Evans, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 39193.
    Protests 715830-G, etc., of Nature’s Herb Co. et al. (San Francisco).
   Opinion by

Evans, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held free of duty as follows: (1) oregano leaves under paragraph 1722, United States v. Strohmeyer (25 C. C. P. A. 120, T. D. 49242) followed; (2) savory leaves under paragraph 1722, Abstract 37783 followed; (3) marjoram leaves under paragraph 1722, Knickerbocker v. United States (T. D. 48959) followed; and (4) thyme leaves under paragraph 1669, Seeck v. United States (T. D. 47383) followed.