Case ID: sw2d_862/html/0926-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Keith A. BROWN, Defendant/Appellant. Keith A. BROWN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    Nos. 61495, 63460.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Sept. 21, 1993.
    Douglas W. Hartig, Office of the Public Defender, Clayton, Judith Larose, Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
    John Munson Morris III, Breck K. Burgess, Office of the Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction for forcible rape, § 566.030, RSMo 1986, and kidnapping, § 565.110, RSMo 1986. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 Motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find defendant’s claims of error are without merit. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.-16(b).