Case ID: sw3d_126/html/0775-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Danisha McBRIDE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 83045.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Jan. 27, 2004.
    
      Daniel L. Mohs, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Andrea Kaye Spillars, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, C.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Danisha McBride appeals from a judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, her motion for post-conviction relief filed under Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b). 
      
      . All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2003, unless otherwise indicated.