Case ID: f-appx_5/html/0302-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James M. DEBARDELEBEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Walter E. BLACK, Jr., U.S. District Judge; Juliet A. Eurich, Assistant U.S. Attorney, District of Maryland; Tarra Deshields-Minnis, Assistant United States Attorney, District of Maryland; Robert D. Bernardi, Prosecutor, Burlington County, New Jersey; Jack Johnson, States Attorney; George A. Swope, Police Sergeant, Prince George’s County, Maryland, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 00-7596.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted March 8, 2001.
    Decided March 15, 2001.
    James M. Debardeleben, pro se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, Allen F. Loucks, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.
    Before DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

James M. Debardeleben appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Debardeleben v. Black, No. CA-00-2391-WMN (D.Md. filed Sept. 7, 2000; entered Sept. 8, 2000). Debardeleben’s motion to file a supplemental pro se brief is denied, and his motion for decision is denied as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.