Case ID: f-appx_126/html/0937-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lawrence LOMBARDI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 04-12691.
    D.C. Docket Nos. 02-00360-CV-4-RH and 99-00071-CR-4-R.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    April 20, 2005.
    Lawrence Lombardi, White Deer, PA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
    
      E. Bryan Wilson, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondent-Appellee.
    Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
    Non-Argument Calendar
   PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, appellant challenges the district court’s decision rejecting his Fed. R.Crim.P. 33 motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence as time-barred because the motion was not filed within the three-year limitations period the rule prescribes. Rule 33’s limitations periods are jurisdictional. United States v. Bramlett, 116 F.3d 1403, 1405 (11th Cir.1997). The district court therefore lacked jurisdiction to consider appellant’s motion.

AFFIRMED.