Case ID: white-w_1/html/0046-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "White, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

E. & J. Greenwood v. J. A. Watts.
    (No. 1112, Op. Book No. 3, p. 442.)
    Appeal from Karnes County.
    February 2, 1881.
   Opinion by

White, J.

§ 114. Discontinuance. If a plaintiff does not insist upon service of citation upon one of several defendants in the court below, but proceeds to trial against the other defendants, it will be considered as a discontinuance of-the suit as to the defendant not served. [Houston v. Ward, 8 Tex. 124; Burton v. Varnell, 5 Tex. 139.]

§ 115. Where there is no statement of facts. In the absence of a statement of facts in the record, the appellate court will presume that whatever facts are necessary to support the judgment of the court below were ¡iroved on the trial.

§ 116. Jurisdiction; county court has none to remove eloucl from title to land. The county court has no jurisdiction of a suit to remove cloud from title to land.

Affirmed.