Case ID: so2d_596/html/0952-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "McMILLAN, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Arthur Lee WEARY v. STATE.
    CR-90-928.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    March 27, 1992.
    Arthur Lee Weary, pro se.
    James H. Evans, Atty. Gen., and Yvonne A. Henderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
    Rob Turner, Montgomery, for appellant on return to remand.
   ON RETURN TO REMAND

McMILLAN, Judge.

We remanded this case to the trial court with instructions to determine whether the appellant wished to pursue his direct appeal. The trial court has now filed its return, which states that the appellant, appearing with his counsel in open court, has “informed the court that he does not wish to pursue this appeal.”

For the reason stated, the appeal is due to be, and it is hereby, dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

All Judges concur.