Case ID: ohio-st-3d_64/html/0206-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Haynes, Appellant, v. Humphreys, Warden, Appellee.
    [Cite as Haynes v. Humphreys (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 206.]
    (No. 91-1447
    Submitted April 7, 1992
    Decided July 22, 1992.)
    
      
      Donnell Haynes, pro se.
    
    
      Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Donald Gary Keyser, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

In In re Petition of Brown (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 222, 551 N.E.2d 954, and Manning v. Alexander (1990), 50 Ohio St.3d 127, 553 N.E.2d 264, we held that appeal, not habeas corpus, was the proper remedy to claim ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. In State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204, we held at paragraph two of the syllabus:

“Claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel may be raised in an application for reconsideration in the court of appeals or in a direct appeal to the Supreme Court pursuant to Section 2(B)(2)(a)(iii), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution. * * *”

Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals based on Brown, Manning, and Mumahan, supra.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.