Case ID: sw3d_92/html/0313-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James W. SCHOTTEL, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Scott B. MEYER, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. ED 81383.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Dec. 17, 2002.
    James W. Schottel, Jr., Schottel & Associates, P.C., St. Louis, MO, pro se.
    Scott B. Meyer, Belleville, IL, pro se.
    Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, James W. Schottel, Jr., appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his tortious interference action for lack of personal jurisdiction. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).