Case ID: ohio-st-3d_15/html/0122-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n     Holmes, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Capers.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Capers (1984), 15 Ohio St. 3d 122.]
    (D.D. No. 84-4
    December 31, 1984.)
    
      
      Mr. Angelo J. Gagliardo, disciplinary counsel, and Mr. Carl J. Corletzi, for relator..
    
      Mr. Jay B. White, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Upon careful review and consideration of the evidence, this court concurs in the finding of the board that respondent violated Canon 7A(1)(b) of the Code of Judicial Conduct, and concurs in the recommendation that respondent be given a public reprimand.

Therefore, it is the judgment of this court that respondent be given a public reprimand.

Judgment accordingly.

W. Brown, Sweeney, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Celebrezze, C.J., dissents.

Locher and Holmes, JJ., dissent separately.

Holmes, J.,

dissenting. I do not believe that the actions of respondent rise to a violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct, and would therefore dismiss the complaint.

Locher, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.