Case ID: so2d_451/html/0954-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eugene ZENOV, Appellant, v. GREENBERG, TRAURIG, ASKEW, HOFFMAN, LIPOFF, QUENTEL & WOLFF, P.A., and Equinational Delvista Towers Joint Venture, a Florida general partnership, Appellees.
    No. 83-2894.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 12, 1984.
    Sidney L. Syna, Miami, for appellant.
    Blackwell, Walker, Gray, Powers, Flick & Hoehl and James C. Blecke, Miami, for appellee Greenberg, Traurig, Askew, Hoffman, Lipoff, Quentel & Wolff, P.A.
    Before HUBBART, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The final order of dismissal under review is affirmed with one modification, to wit: the dismissal herein shall be without prejudice to the plaintiff to file an amended complaint in which the defendants Greenberg, Traurig, Askew, Hoffman, Lipoff, Quentel & Wolff, P.A. are sued solely as nominal party stakeholders of the security deposit herein. See Ullendorff v. Graham, 80 Fla. 845, 852, 87 So. 50, 53 (1920); Lewis v. Howanitz, 378 So.2d 310, 311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Ayers v. Homeowners Ass’n of Killearn Estates, 360 So.2d 1326 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Ossinsky v. Nance, 118 So.2d 47, 49 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960).

Affirmed as modified.