Case ID: ala_215/html/0107-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.*", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(109 So. 891)
    BIRMINGHAM ELECTRIC CO. v. PUTMAN.
    (6 Div. 757.)
    (Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Oct. 21, 1926.)
    Certiorari to Court of Appeals.
    W. S. Pritchard and J. D. Higgins, both of Birmingham, for petitioner.
    Bradley, Baldwin, All & White, and Wm. Douglas Arant, all of Birmingham, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.*

Petition of John S. Putman for certiorari to Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Birmingham Electric Co. v. Putman, 21 Ala. App. 431, 109 So. 890.

Petition dismissed for failure of compliance with Supreme Court rule 44, Code 1923, vol. 4, p. 894.

SOMERVILLE, GARDNER, THOMAS, and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.