Case ID: ga-app_46/html/0692-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

23001.
    Sangster v. The State.
    Decided April 5, 1933.
    
      Jack Taggart, D. L. Henderson, for plaintiff in error.
    
      T. Hoyt Davis, solicitor-general, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

Under the counter-showing made by the State, and the discretion vested in the trial judge, he did not err in overruling the ground of the motion for a new trial based on alleged newly discovered evidence.

2. The evidence amply supports the verdict; the testimony of the defendant’s accomplice was sufficiently corroborated; and the refusal to- grant a new trial was not error for any reason assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.