Case ID: ny_161/html/0666-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edmund W. Converse et al., Respondents and Appellants, v. Daniel E. Sickles, Sheriff of the City and County of New York, Appellant and Respondent.
    
      Converse v. Sickles, 16 App. Div. 49, affirmed.
    (Submitted February 1, 1900;
    decided February 16, 1900.)
    Cross-appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, transferred from the first tó the second judicial department, entered in the county of New York May 3, 1897, modifying, and affirming as modified, a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court .on trial at Special Term.
    
      A. Blumenstíól for defendant, appellant and respondent.
    
      Frederic B. Kellogg for plaintiffs, respondents and appellants.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Yann and Werner, JJ. Not sitting: Cullen, J.