Case ID: ariz_195/html/0429-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

990 P.2d 23
    STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. William Daniel KING, Appellant.
    No. CR-98-0562-PR.
    Supreme Court of Arizona.
    Dec. 8, 1999.
   ORDER

After hearing oral argument and considering further the pleadings filed, it appears to the Court that the grant of review was improvident. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the order granting review is vacated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Review is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court of Appeals Opinion shall not be published, pursuant to Rule 111(g), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.