Case ID: ga-app_34/html/0221-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

16534.
    HOGAN v. THE STATE.
    The verdict finding the accused guilty of burglary was authorized by the evidence.
    Decided July 29, 1925.
    Indictment for burglary; from Eulton superior court—Judge Howard. May 9, 1925.
    
      J. W. LeCraw, for plaintiff in error.
    
      John A. Boylcin, solicitor-general, E. A. Stephens, Ralph H. Pharr, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial contains the general grounds only. The indictment charged the accused with the offense of burglary, for that, with intent to steal, he did break and enter the storehouse of Bill Newman and did privately take, steal, and carry away therefrom “one Smith and Wesson 38-caliber revolver, four boxes of El Toro cigars, and one Norwood cord automobile tire and rim.” Every material allegation in the indictment is supported by evidence, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.