Case ID: so2d_502/html/0080-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DADE TOMATO COMPANY, INC., and State Automobile Insurance Company, Appellants, v. HOMESTEAD TOMATO PACKING COMPANY, INC., Appellee.
    No. 86-2247.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Feb. 10, 1987.
    Lococo & Klein and Stuart Saltzman, North Miami, Gary E. Sherman, Miami, for appellants.
    Ruiz, Skelton & Maloney, Tampa, Scott, McLeod, Himmelberg, Matz, Pires & Price and Kevin F. Meckus and Alexander J. Pires, Jr., Washington, D.C., for appellee.
    Before HENDRY, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Our review of the record discloses that the hearing officer’s findings of fact are supported by substantial, competent evidence, and the record discloses neither an abuse of discretion nor a violation of law by the agency. Cohen v. School Bd. of Dade County, 450 So.2d 1238 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Affirmed.