Case ID: sw2d_977/html/0029-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Clay B. WRIGHT, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Vincent WRIGHT, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. 71810.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    July 21, 1998.
    Rehearing Denied Sept. 30, 1998.
    Bruce Nangle, Barbara Nangle, Nangle & Nangle, P.C., St. Louis, for appellant.
    Rodolfo Rivera, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals a judgment of dissolution claiming the court erred: 1) in awarding the respondent a lump sum to be distributed over twenty years and 2) in awarding the respondent an interest in appellant’s pension entitlements.

We have read the briefs, reviewed the legal file and transcript. We find no error of law and no jurisprudential purpose will be served by an extended written opinion. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).