Case ID: ny-super-ct_59/html/0568-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

AARON ALTMAYER, Respondent v. THE METROPOLITAN ELEVATED RAILWAY COMPANY, et al., Appellants. MARIE T. HAUSER, Respondent v. Same Defendants, Appellants. JOHN BECKER, Respondent v. Same Defendants, Appellants. CHARLES F. HELMS, Respondent v. Same Defendants, Appellants.
    Appeals— Omission in decision of requests found. In the absence of a motion for the correction of the omission and an order thereon, the omission ■ appears to be without objection and a consent is thereby evinced that the cases proceed and appeals be heard on the decision as made.
    
    Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., and McAdam, J.
    
      Decided May 4, 1891.
    
      Appeals from judgments entered on findings and conclusions made by a judge on a trial before the court without a jury.
    
      Davies & Rapallo, attorneys, and Julien T. Davies and J. C. Thomson of counsel, for appellants.
    
      Sackett & Bennett, attorneys, and Charles Gibson Bennett of counsel, for respondents.
   The Court (per Curiam) held as stated in the headnote and affirmed the judgments, with costs.