Case ID: nj-eq_106/html/0277-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Esther Ross, respondent, v. Charles Ross, appellant.
    [Decided February 3d, 1930.]
    
      Mr. Edward Thomas Moore, for the respondent.
    
      Messrs. Carey & Lane, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in 105 N. J. Eq. 170.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Kalisch, Black, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, McGlennon, Kays, Dear, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Parker, Campbell, Vah Buskirk, Hetfield, JJ. 4.