Case ID: so3d_227/html/0779-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DYCK-O’NEAL, INC., Appellant, v. Angella MASSA & Joseph Massa, Appellees.
    CASE NO. 1D16-4350
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed October 16, 2017
    Consuegra, Chad W. Howard, and Joshua D. Moore of- the Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, Tampa, for Appellant.
    ' Catrina H. Markwalier and J. Morgan Foster, Shutts & Bowén, LLP, Jacksonville, for Appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Higgins v. Dyck-O’Neal, Inc., 201 So,3d 157 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (holding that a party is not entitled to pursue a separate action for deficiency judgment where the foreclosure complaint includes a prayer for a deficiency judgment and the foreclosure court reserves jurisdiction to enter a deficiency judgment); see also Dyck-O’Neal, Inc. v. Lanham, 214 So,3d 802 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (certifying conflict between this Court’s decision in Higgins and decisions by the other four district courts of appeal).

ROBERTS, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.