Case ID: sw_282/html/0591-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HAWKINS, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ANDRA v. STATE.
    (No. 10102.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    April 14, 1926.)
    Criminal law <&wkey;>!090(!4).
    Objection to charge Cannot be considered, in absence of bills of exception in record or statement of facts.
    Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 2, Dallas County; C. A. Pippen, Judge.
    Harry Andra was convicted of theft of an automobile of over the value of $50, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    A. H. Mount, of Dallas, for appellant.
    Sam D. Stinson, State’s Atty., of Austin, and Robt. M. Lyles, Asst. State’s Atty., of Groesbeck, for the State.
   HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for theft of an automobile of over the value of $50. The punishment is four years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

No bills of exception are found in the record, nor is it accompanied by a statement of the facts proven upon the trial. The only exception of any kind is one addressed to a clause of the charge, based upon the assertion that the evidence failed to authorize such instruction. Manifestly, without the evidence before us this objection to the charge cannot be appraised.

The judgment is affirmed.