Case ID: ad_148/html/0911-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Solomon Katz, an Infant, by Mary Katz, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Charles H. Lott, Respondent.
    Appeal from a judgment entered in the Mew York county clerk’s office on the 23d day of June, 1911, upon a verdict directed by the court and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
   Per Curiam:

We think that there was a question of fact for the jury and that upon the evidence the learned trial judge was not justified in directing a verdict for the defendant. The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Miller and Dowling, JJ.; McLaughlin, J., dissented. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.