Case ID: so2d_927/html/0204-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronald EDMUNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 5D05-131.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    April 28, 2006.
    James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Rose M. Levering, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
    Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Espinosa, 686 So.2d 1345, 1348-49 (Fla.1996) (holding a defendant who requests an instruction on a lesser-included offense cannot contest the sufficiency of the evidence on the lesser-included offense when sufficient evidence exists to convict the defendant for the greater offense).

THOMPSON, GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.