Case ID: nd_24/html/0325-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HAWKINS v. SINCLAIR.
    (140 N. W. 239.)
    Opinion filed November 20, 1912.
    Rehearing denied Jaunary 7, 1913.
    Motion by respondent to dismiss the appeal and also to vacate an order made by a judge of this court permitting a supersedeas undertaking on appeal to be given.
    The motion denied and second motion granted.
    
      Carr & Kneeland and 8. E. Ellsworth, for respondent.
    
      Knauf & Knauf, for appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The motions in the case at bar present the same questions that were just decided by us in the case of Burger v. Sinclair, post, 326, 140 N. W. 235, and the decision in that case controls this. The same order will accordingly be made herein with the exception that no costs are allowed.

Goss, J., being disqualified, did not participate.