Case ID: cust-ct_48/html/0390-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Johnson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 66625.
    Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States,
    protests 60/30721 and 61/1406 (New York).
   Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of porcelain furniture sets similar in ail material respects to those the subject of J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc. v. United States (34 Cust. Ct. 145, C.D. 1695), the merchandise was held dutiable under paragraph 1513 of the act or under said paragraph, as modified, supra, at the rate in effect at the time the respective items were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption.