Case ID: nj-eq_141/html/0363-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary Borthwick, respondent, v. Michael Skurzynski, &c., appellant.
    [Submitted October 31st, 1947.
    Decided January 29th, 1948.]
    
      Mr. James D. Connell, for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. Pierson ■£ Brand (Mr. Alfred D’Auria, of counsel), for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Egan, and reported at 139 N. J. Eq. 520.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Colie, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Preund, McLean, JJ. 11.

For reversal — -Heher, Schettino, JJ, 2.