Case ID: f-appx_609/html/0065-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re James Daniel SPORISH, Petitioner.
    No. 15-1575.
    United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
    Submitted Pursuant to Fed. R.App. Pro. 21 April 23, 2015.
    Opinion filed: July 15, 2015.
    
      James Daniel Sporish, Albion Sci, Albion, PA, pro se.
    Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, GARTH and BARRY, Circuit Judges.
   OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner James Sporish, a Pennsylvania state prisoner, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus .pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on July 19, 2012. The case was referred to a Magistrate Judge. The District Attorney’s Office of Delaware County filed a response on September 13, 2012. In early 2013, Sporish amended his petition, and filed several motions, including a motion for discovery. The state promptly responded to these filings. In October 2013, the case was marked closed and placed in civil suspense pending a report from the Magistrate Judge.

On March 10, 2015, Sporish filed a petition for a writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 with this Court, alleging extraordinary delay in the adjudication of his petition below. Subsequently, on May 7, 2015, the Magistrate Judge denied all of Sporish’s outstanding motions and entered a Report & Recommendation recommending that Sporish’s habeas petition be denied with prejudice. Accordingly, because Sporish has obtained the relief he requested, the mandamus petition will be dismissed as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir.1996). 
      
      
         This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.