Case ID: f-appx_222/html/0637-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel GONZALEZ-CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-10178.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted Feb. 20, 2007 .
    Filed Feb. 26, 2007.
    Claire Kiehl Lefkowitz, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    David Taylor Shannon, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: GOODWIN, TASHIMA and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Daniel Gonzalez-Chavez appeals his sentence following his guilty plea to an illegal reentry offense, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1).

Appellant’s assertion that his state conviction does not constitute a “crime of violence” for sentencing purposes is foreclosed by United States v. Asberry, 394 F.3d 712, 718 (9th Cir.2005) (concluding that a conviction under Oregon Revised Statute section 163.355 is a “crime of violence”).

Accordingly, respondent’s motion for summary affirmance of the district court’s judgment is granted because this appeal is controlled by precedent. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.