Case ID: f-appx_571/html/0250-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank MARFO, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-4913.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 6, 2014.
    Decided: May 16, 2014.
    Frank Marfo, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frank Marfo appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking the identities and notes of the grand juries that returned the indictment and superseding indictment in this case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Marfo, No. 1:11-cr-00657-MJG-3 (D.Md. Nov. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.