Case ID: f_71/html/0097-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SANBORN, Circuit Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WHITE et al. v. IOWA NAT. BANK OF DES MOINES.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    December 2, 1895.)
    No. 533.
    Writ ok Kins on — Limitations.
    Under Act Mareli 3, 1891, § 11, a writ of error must be sued out within six months in order to authorize a review by the circuit court of appeals.
    In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa.
    Writ of error, sued out by Stephen V. White, Franklin W. Hopkins, and S. V. White & Co., to review a judgment in favor of the Iowa National Bank of Des Moines, Iowa. Writ dismissed.
    C. H. Hatch (C. A. Dudley and N. E. Collin were with him on the brief), for plaintiffs in error.
    A. B. Cummins (Carroll Wright was with him on the brief), for defendant in error.
    Before CALDWELL, SANBORN, and THAYER, Circuit Judges.
   SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

This court has no jurisdiction of this case. The writ of error was sued out on July 9, 1891, to review a judgment of dismissal of the action which was rendered on October 18, 1893. No motion for a new trial was made in the court below, and the judgment was final on that day, more than eight months before the writ of error was issued. Section 11 of the act of March 3, 1891, which created this court, and gave it the right to review the judgments of the circuit courts, provides:

“That no appeal or writ of error by which any order, judgment, or decree may be reviewed in the circuit courts of appeals under the provisions of tills act shall be taken or sued out except within six months after the entry of the order, judgment, or decree sought to be reviewed.” 28 Stat. 829, c. 517; 1 Supp. Rev. St. p. 904.

The writ, must, accordingly, be dismissed, and it is so ordered.