Case ID: nys_97/html/1139-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. WILLIAMS, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LANE, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. H. R. R. CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, ppellate Division, Fourth Department,
    arch 28, 1906.)
    Action by Frank Lane ainst the New York Central & Hudson River tilroad Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order aimed, with costs.

WILLIAMS, J.,

dissents, upon the ground at no negligence was shown on the part of the fendant, that plaintiff assumed the risk, and at the exceptions as to evidence and the arge of the court present reversible errors.