Case ID: nys_47/html/1146-14.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RENNINGER, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. Co., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    March 24, 1897.)
    Action by John N. Renninger against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.
   No opinion. Motion granted, and order amended as follows: Ordered, that that part of the order which denies a motion for a new trial made on a case and exceptions, on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the evidence, and that it is for excessive damages, affirmed, and that part of the ordei; which denied a motion for a new trial on exceptions taken, and because the verdict is contrary to law, is, together with the judgment, reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. All concur, except WARD, J., dissenting. See 43 N. Y. Supp. 1163.