Case ID: f-appx_182/html/0187-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Darryl W. LANE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Nora HUNT; Vickie Hardie; Gary Denobrega; Sharon Carthen, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 06-6167.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted May 16, 2006.
    Decided May 23, 2006.
    Darryl W. Lane, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Darryl W. Lane appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Lane v. Hunt, No. 5:05-ct-00770-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 12, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED