Case ID: cust-ct_58/html/0726-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      WatsoN, Judge:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(R.D. 11309)
    Shalom & Co. v. United States
    Entry Nos. 472817; 477467.
    (Decided May 23, 1967)
    
      Lane, Young & Fox for the plaintiff.
    
      CarlJUardley, Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
   WatsoN, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties herein:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the above appeals for reappraisement consists of human hair wigs exported from Hong Kong subsequent to February 27,1958.
That said wigs are not identified in the Final List, published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958; and that said merchandise was entered for consumption subsequent to February 27,. 1958.
That on or about the dates of exportation of the said merchandise, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold, or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of Hong Kong, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the appraised value less the buying commission, as stated on the invoices.
It is further stipulated and agreed that the above appeals for reap-praisement may be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1980, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here in question and that such value in each case was the appraised value, less the buying commission as stated on the invoices.

Judgment will issue accordingly.