Case ID: so2d_632/html/1123-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ART & ART CORP., U.S.A., Appellant, v. Norman FRANK, Appellee.
    No. 93-1879.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 8, 1994.
    Gelb & Spatz and Carl A. Spatz, Miami, for appellant.
    Rosen & Switkes and David Jove, Miami Beach, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and LEVY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The summary judgment for plaintiff entered below is reversed because of the existence of numerous genuine issues of material fact prominently including whether the note sued upon was supported by consideration, subject to a condition precedent, or both.