Case ID: nj_33/html/0299-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

TIMOTHY HIGGINS, AN INFANT, ETC., PLAINTIFF, AND CHARLES A. HIGGINS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM A. SCHNEIDER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Argued September 27, 1960
    Decided October 10, 1960.
    
      Mr. Stanley W. Greenfield argued the cause for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Edward G. Hillis argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Harley, Winhelried & Hillis, attorneys).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Haneman in the court below.

Mr. Chief Justice Weintbaub and Mr. Justice Schettino vote to reverse the judgment for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Ereund.

For affirmance — Justices Bueling, Jacobs, Ebancis, Pkoctok and Hall — 5.

For reversal — Chief Justice Weinteatjb, and Justice Schettino — 2.