Case ID: ad_232/html/0840-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alsop Holding Corporation, Appellant, v. Pauline Reisman and Others, Respondents.
    (Appeal No. 1.)
   Order reversed • upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Under the facts and circumstances disclosed here, we think the cancellation of the Us pendens upon filing an undertaking for $80,000 was an improper exercise of discretion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.