Case ID: ohio-st-3d_73/html/0046-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State ex rel. May, Appellant, v. Cissell, Clerk, et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as State ex rel. May v. Cissell (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 46.]
    (Nos. 95-546 and 95-547
    Submitted June 21, 1995
    Decided August 9, 1995.)
    
      Morris May, pro se.
    
    
      Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Christian J. Schaefer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees.
   The judgments of the court of appeals dismissing the complaints for writs of mandamus are affirmed on the basis that appellant possesses an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law to correct the trial court records via App.R. 9(E). See State ex rel. Howard v. Ferreri (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 587, 592, 639 N.E.2d 1189, 1194-1195, and cases cited therein.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.