Case ID: kan_86/html/0212-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n     Johnston, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alice Stratton, as Administratrix, etc., Appellee, v. C. B. Rotrock, Appellant.
    
    No. 16,737.
    OPINION ON "REHEARING.
    Appeal from Ottawa district court.
    Opinion on rehearing, filed December 9, 1911.
    Reversal sustained.
    (For original opinion, see 84 Kan. 198, 114 Pac. 224.)
    
      G. W. Hurd, and Arthur Hurd, for the appellant.
    
      E. C. Sweet, and F. D. Boyce, for the appellee.
   Per Curiam:

The questions presented in this case have been reargued and carefully reconsidered, and the court adheres to the former decision therein. (Stratton v. Rotrock, 84 Kan. 198, 114 Pac. 224.)

Johnston, C. J.

(dissenting): The findings of the trial court • do not, in my opinion, warrant this court in directing that judg■.ment be entered in favor of the appéllant.

Burch, J., also dissents.