Case ID: ill_187/html/0115-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Elizabeth Boyd et al. v. The City of Chicago.
    
    
      Opinion filed October 19, 1900.
    
    This case is controlled by the decision in Kuester v. City of Chicago, (ante, p. 21.)
    Writ of Error to the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. P. H. Sanford, Judge, presiding.
    George W. Wilbur, for plaintiffs in error.
    Charles M. Walker, Corporation Counsel, Armand F. Teefy, and William M. Pindell, for defendant in error.
    
      
      With this case are decided Nos. 946, Martin v. City of Chicago; 954, Ingalls v. Same; 961, Haines v. Same; and 850, Betcher v. Same.
      
    
   Per Curiam:

The above case, and the four cases decided with it, are writs of error to the county court of Cook county to reverse judgments affirming special assessments for the improvement of streets in the city of Chicago. In all material respects these cases are like the case of Kuester v. City of Chicago, (ante, p. 21,) and on the authority of that case and others therein cited the judgments of the county court must be reversed and the causes remanded.

Reversed and remanded.