Case ID: f-appx_591/html/0238-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Torrence D. CROUELL, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sgt. REED; c/o Fountain; Asst. Supt. F. Taylor; Female Lieutenant, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 14-7451.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 12, 2015.
    Decided: Feb. 18, 2015.
    
      Torrence D. Crouell, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
    Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Torrence D. Crouell, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, and denying his motion to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crouell v. Reed, No. 5:13 — ct— 03239-BO (E.D.N.C. June 2, 2014; Sept. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.