Case ID: njl_110/html/0022-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

EDWARD THOMPSON COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. ELWOOD C. WEEKS, APPELLANT.
    Submitted October 28, 1932
    Decided January 23, 1933.
    For the respondent, Robertson <& Robertson.
    
    For the appellant, Elwood G. Weelcs.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 174.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchaed, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Brogan, Heher, Kays, Heteield, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Hone.