Case ID: njl_122/html/0381-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROSE FOLK ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. HACKENSACK WATER COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
    Submitted February 17, 1939
    Decided April 21, 1939.
    For the appellant, Nathan Baker.
    
    For the respondent, Samuel W. Zerman.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.