Case ID: sw2d_845/html/0723-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jack L. VAUGHN, D.V.M., Appellant, v. MISSOURI VETERINARY MEDICAL BOARD, Respondent.
    No. WD 46418.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Jan. 26, 1993.
    Earl F. Seitz, Columbia, for appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jane A. Rackers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before LOWENSTEIN, C.J., and FENNER and HANNA, JJ.
    
      
      . The appellant named the Administrative Hearing Commission as a party respondent in this appeal. The administrative hearing agency is not a contending party on appeal. We have deleted the Administrative Hearing Commission as a named respondent. See Geriatric Nursing Facility, Inc. v. Department of Social Services, 693 S.W.2d 206, 209 (Mo.App.1985).
    
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from the respondent’s revocation of appellant’s license to practice veterinarian medicine.

Judgment Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).