Case ID: so2d_265/html/0514-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ivan STOUT and Helen A. Stout, Appellants, v. William J. KEHLENBACK et al., Appellees.
    Nos. Q-143, Q-144.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    July 13, 1972.
    Rehearing Denied Aug. 28, 1972.
    Paul Bernardini, of Stern and Bernardini, P. A., Daytona Beach, for appellants.
    Robert W. Elton, of Sands, Smalbein, Eubank, Johnson, Rosier & Bussey, Day-tona Beach, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

This appeal questions the correctness of a summary judgment rendered in favor of appellees.

A careful examination of the record on appeal conclusively established the absence of any genuine triable issue of a material fact and that appellees were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed. F.S. Sections 767.01-767.04, F.S.A.; Reid v. Nelson (Sth Cir. 1946) 154 F.2d 724.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and WIGGIN-TON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.