Case ID: misc_180/html/0995-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Memorandum Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Morris Israel, Appellant, v. Goldie Krupa, Defendant, and Robert Krupa, Defendant-Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    June 28, 1943.
    
      
      Solomon C. Stember and Samuel C. Cantor for appellant.
    
      Morris J. Norwick for respondent.
   Memorandum Per Curiam.

Where a guest in plaintiff’s automobile sues plaintiff and defendants for personal injuries suffered as a result of a collision between two automobiles driven by plaintiff and defendant-respondent, the judgment obtained in her favor against plaintiff and in defendants’ favor may not be set up against plaintiff as res judicata in a subsequent action by plaintiff against defendant-respondent for property damage. (Self v. International Ry. Co., 224 App. Div. 238.) The defendant not having appealed from the dismissal of his counterclaim he may not have a second trial. (Ginsberg v. City of Long Beach, 286 K Y. 400, 403.)

Judgment and order so far as appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event, and motion denied.

Hammer, Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur.