Case ID: f-appx_182/html/0173-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Caroline Adhiambo OKELLO, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
    Nos. 04-2391, 05-1367.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 24, 2006.
    Decided: May 12, 2006.
    Randall L. Johnson, Johnson & Associates, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Respondent.
    
      Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Petitions denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated petitions for review, Caroline Adhiambo Okello, a native and citizen of Kenya, petitions for review of two separate orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”): (1) denying her motion to reopen, and (2) denying her motion to reconsider its denial of her motion to reopen immigration proceedings.

We have reviewed the record and the Board’s orders and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying either Okello’s motion to reopen or her motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2006); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir.2006). We therefore deny both petitions for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In Re: Okello, No. [ AXXXXX-XXX ] (B.I.A. Oct. 8, 2004 & Feb. 9, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITIONS DENIED.