Case ID: njl_86/html/0376-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Cue cam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

EDMUND D. VANDERBILT, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. KATE A. MIAL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Submitted December 15, 1913
    Decided March 16, 1914.
    Oil appeal from the Hudson County Circuit Court.
    Bor the plaintiff-respondent, Rudolph Schroeder and John D. Pierson.
    
    Bor the defendant-appellant, Samuel A. Besson.
    
   Per Cue cam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons firstly and secondly expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chancellor in the ease of Davis v. Mial, at the present term of this court, ante p. 167.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, White, Heppen-HEIMER, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Hone.