Case ID: sw2d_949/html/0079-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Billy WOODY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    Nos. 70486, 70523.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    April 22, 1997.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 14,1997.
    Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for movant/appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Fernando Bermudez, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent/respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).