Case ID: ga-app_16/html/0736-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Wade, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

5911.
    City of Rome v. Ragan.
    Decided September 3, 1915.
    Action for damages; from city court of Floyd county — Judge Reece. June 18, 1914.
    
      Max Meyerhardt, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Lipscomb & Willingham, Nathan Harris, contra.
   Wade, J.

1. There was evidence supporting the verdict.

2. It does not appear from either of the two grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial that the cause of the movant was sufficiently prejudiced to have required the grant of a new trial; and the rulings of the court are not, for the reasons stated, erroneous.

Judgment affirmed.