Case ID: f2d_625/html/1310-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, et al., Defendants-Appellees, v. FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, CITY OF MIAMI LODGE NO. 20, Kenneth R. Harrison, President, and the Miami Police Benevolent Association, Defendants-Appellants.
    No. 77-1856.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Aug. 26, 1980.
    Irving Weinsoff, Miami, Fla., for defendants-appellants.
    David L. Rose, Squire Padgett, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-ap-pellee.
    George F. Knox, Jr., Miami, Fla., for City of Miami.
    ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
    (Opinion, 5 Cir., 1980, 614 F.2d 1322).
    Before COLEMAN, Chief Judge, BROWN, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, CHARLES CLERK, RONEY, GEE, TJO-FLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE, KRAVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., GARZA, HENDERSON, REAVLEY, POL-ITZ, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON, THOMAS A. CLARK and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
   BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc.

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.