Case ID: njl_102/html/0226-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. LOUIS ROMMEL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted May 29, 1925
    Decided September 9, 1925.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N. J. Mis. R. 204.
    For the plaintiff in error, Lindabury & Steelman (Harry A. Augenblick, of counsel).
    For the defendant in error, John O. Bigelow, prosecutor of the pleas.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.