Case ID: f-appx_712/html/0434-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Paul Lynn SCHLIEVE, Defendant-Appellant
    No. 14-40577
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Filed February 15, 2018
    Alan Reeve Jackson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Tyler, TX, Maureen Clancy Smith, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Sherman, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    William Jones, Jones Law Firm, Madison, WI, for Defendant-Appellant
    Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the certain reasons set forth in the magistrate judge’s report of August 24, 2010.

The conviction of Schlieve was affirmed by this court in 2005, and then he filed a motion under § 2255 to vacate his sentence. The only point still pursued claims that defense counsel was misled by the prosecutor about evidence on a video that would have been Brady material and could have been suppressed had not counsel been misled. The record fully obliterates that claim, because the defense counsel had possession of the video, as did the jury. No evidence stands to support it.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.