Case ID: nj-misc_13/html/0340-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

VITO LEMONGELLI, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. THE CARLSON COMPANY, RESPONDENT-PROSECUTOR.
    Argued January 16, 1935
    Decided April 15, 1935.
    Before Justices Heher and Perskie.
    For the prosecutor, Kalisch & Kalisch.
    
    For the respondent, Cohen <& Klein.
    
   Per Curiam.

Our study of the record submitted, leads us to the conclusion that it presents no debatable question, and accordingly the writ of certiorari is denied.