Case ID: ad2d_178/html/0959-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael J. Lyng, Appellant.
   — Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: None of the issues raised by defendant warrants reversal. The trial court did not err in making its Sandoval ruling; the verdict was supported by sufficient evidence and accorded with the weight of the evidence; defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the court’s instruction on interested witnesses unfairly singled out defendant; and the sentence was not harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Jefferson County Court, Clary, J.— Rape, 1st Degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.