Case ID: conn-app_120/html/0836-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MARK HEINONEN v. JAMES M. MANDRACCHIA ET AL.
    (AC 30858)
    Flynn, C. J., and Graendel and West, Js.
    
    Argued February 17
    officially released May 4, 2010
    
      
      Mark Heinonen, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).
    
      J. Kevin Golger, for the appellees (defendants).
    
      
       The listing of judges reflects their seniority status on this court as of the date of oral argument.
    
   Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this negligence action, the plaintiff, Mark Heinonen, appeals from the judgment, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the defendants, James M. Mandracchia and Cheryl Mandracchia. After a thorough review of the record, transcripts, briefs and oral argument, and affording those claims that properly are before this court careful consideration, we conclude that the plaintiffs claims are without merit.

The judgment is affirmed.