Case ID: wend_2/html/0246-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      By the Court, Marcy, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Shiland vs. Cory and Doe.
    and ho ca. sa. Me iman^acnuance 1<3c°fl gainst bail. JVM tiel record, no iudement.
    Motion to strike out, or that defendant elect which pies he will abide Jiy. Declaration, debt on recognizance of bail. Pleas, 1. Jful tiel record; 2. No judgment against defend-ant in original suit; 3. No copias ad satisfaciendum, sued out against defendant in such suit; and 4. That the defendants did not enter into the recognizance of bail.
   By the Court, Marcy, J.

The three first pleas are not. incompatible, under the statute allowing double pleading. The fourth plea would probably be held bad on demurrer.

Motion denied.