Case ID: wash_26/html/0322-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 3957.
    Decided October 26, 1901.]
    Benjamin W. Padley, Appellant, v. James Gregg, et al., Respondents.
    
    APPEALABLE ORDER-RULING ON DEMURRER. An order sustaining a demurrer is not an appealable one.
    
      Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Boyd J. Tallman, Judge.
    Appeal dismissed.
    
      II. F. Foster, for appellant.
    
      William Hickman Moore, for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

Motion is made to dismiss the appeal in this case for the reason that said appeal is from an order sustaining a demurrer. The record showing that the appeal was talten from the order of the court sustaining a demurrer to appellant’s complaint, the motion must he sustained, as we have decided in Potvin v. McCorvey, 1 Wash. 389 (25 Pac. 330), and Mason County v. Dunbar, 10 Wash. 163 (38 Pac. 1003), that an appeal will not lie from an order sustaining a demurrer. The case falls within the rule announced in those cases, and the appeal is dismissed.