Case ID: f-appx_196/html/0227-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re: Sean Lamont DUDLEY, a/k/a John D. Brown, Petitioner.
    No. 06-6452.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 24, 2006.
    Decided: Aug. 30, 2006.
    Sean Lamont Dudley, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    
      Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Sean Lamont Dudley petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court unduly delayed acting on his August 2004 motion for reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket sheet reveals that the district court recently entered a final judgment on Dudley’s motion for consideration. See Dudley v. United States, No. 5:99-cv-00152 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 7, 2006). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED