Case ID: ad3d_78/html/1597-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Verizon New York, Inc., Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.
    [910 NYS2d 725]
   —Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Jeremiah J. Moriarty, III, J.), entered July 8, 2009. The interlocutory judgment apportioned liability 35% to defendant and 65% to claimant.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Claimant commenced this action alleging that defendant damaged its underground telecommunication line while performing “sidewalk/bridge” repairs in the City of Niagara Falls. After a nonjury trial on the issue of liability, the Court of Claims determined that both parties were negligent and apportioned liability 65% to claimant and 35% to defendant.

We conclude upon our review of the record that the court properly attributed a greater portion of the fault to claimant (see Denio v State of New York, 11 AD3d 914, 915 [2004], amended on rearg 13 AD3d 1231 [2004], affd 7 NY3d 159 [2006]; Schmidt v State of New York, 21 Misc 3d 1114[A], 2005 NY Slip Op 52377[U] [2005], affd for reasons stated 39 AD 3d 1237 [2007]; see generally Stewart v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 60 AD3d 445, 445-446 [2009]). Present— Martoche, J.E, Sconiers, Green and Pine, JJ.