Case ID: ad3d_41/html/0172-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Barbara Keleman, Appellant, v Quinton Fitness Equipment, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
    [838 NYS2d 51]
   Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered January 16, 2007, which granted defendants-respondents’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff claims that she fell off a treadmill when it suddenly increased in speed after her hand inadvertently struck the control panel’s acceleration button, and submits an engineer’s opinion that the treadmill was defectively designed in that its acceleration button was located only five inches from the right edge of the control panel where a user might be expected to hold onto the treadmill for balance. However, plaintiff, at her deposition, unequivocally stated that her hands did not touch the speed buttons on the treadmill’s control panel just before the belt unexpectedly speeded up. Given such testimony, neither the alleged design defect, nor any failure to warn against holding onto the edges of the control panel, could have been a proximate cause of the accident. Plaintiffs attempt to defeat summary judgment with an affidavit in opposition recharacterizing the plain meaning of her testimony was properly rejected (see Blackmon v Dinstuhl, 27 AD3d 241 [2006]). We have considered and rejected plaintiffs other arguments. Concur— Sullivan, J.P., Nardelli, Buckley, Catterson and Kavanagh, JJ.