Case ID: f-appx_657/html/0176-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kalonji Skou EWING, a/k/a Luck, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-6378
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: August 31, 2016
    Decided: September 14, 2016
    
      Kalonji Skou Ewing, Appellant Pro Se. Dena Janae King, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kalonji Skou Ewing appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. Because the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider Ewing’s motion for reconsideration, we affirm the denial of relief. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding that district court lacks authority to grant motion to reconsider ruling on § 3582(c)(2) motion). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED