Case ID: nj_47/html/0210-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cubiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MAURICE A. O’KEEFE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THOMAS G. DUNN, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
    Argued May 9, 1966
    Decided May 23, 1966.
    
      Mr. Edward W. McGrath argued the cause for appellants.
    
      Mr. William Miller argued the cause for respondent.
   Pee Cubiam.

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons given by the trial court in its opinion reported in 89 N. J. Super. 383 (Law Div. 1965).

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weinteatjb and Justices Jacobs, Eeanois, Peootoe, Hall and Schettino — 6.

For reversal — Hone.