Case ID: sw2d_2/html/0513-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BLAIR, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BANKERS’ HEALTH & ACCIDENT CO. OF AMERICA v. WHITEHEAD.
    (No. 7189.)
    Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.
    Jan. 11, 1928.
    Pleading &wkey;>l 11 — Overruling plea of privilege, where plaintiff did not file controverting affidavit, held error (Rev. St. 1925, art. 2007).
    Overruling defendant’s plea of privilege to remove suit to county of domicile, where plaintiff did not file controverting affidavit, held reversible error, under Rev. St. 1925, art. 2007, making uncontroverted plea of privilege prima facie proof of defendants right to change of venue.
    Appeal from Coleman County Court; C. L. South, Judge.
    Action by Dr. J. B. Whitehead against the Bankers’ Health & Accident Company of America. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
    Reversed and remanded, with instructions.
    J. B. Dibrell, Jr., of Coleman, for appellant.
    H. L. Livingston, of Coleman, for appel-lee.
   BLAIR, J.

Appellee sued appellant on a sick benefit or health policy contract on a claim for $201. Appellant filed a plea of privilege to remove the suit to Harris county, its place of domicile. -IThe trial court overruled the plea, notwithstanding no controverting affidavit was filed by appellee. Subject to the plea of privilege appellant answered formally and by pleas setting up special defenses.' The case was tried to the court without a jury and resulted in a judgment in favor of appellee for $176, from which judgment this appeal is perfected.

The judgment must be reversed because of the action of the trial court on the plea of privilege. The statute, providing for pleas of privilege and procedure thereunder, makes the filing of such a plea “prima facie proof of the defendant’s right to change of venue,” and, unless plaintiff shall controvert the plea within the time prescribed and under oath, the court is without further jurisdiction on the venue question, except to hear the plea, and, if fopnd sufficient, is required by the statute to transfer the case. Article 2007, R. S. 1925; Texas Life Ins. Co. v. Black (Tex. Civ. App.) 237 S. W. 622; Wallace v. Adams (Tex. Civ. App.) 243 S. W. 572; Bennett v. Rose Mfg. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 226 S. W. 143; Phenix v. Davis, 265 S. W. 718; Russell Grader Mfg. Co. v. McMillin (Tex. Civ. App.) 271 S. W. 124; Comer v. Landrum (Tex. Civ. App.) 277 S. W. 743; Ryan v. Johnson (Tex. Civ. App.) 284 S. W. 652; Sibley v. Continental Supply Co. (Tex. Sup.) 292 S. W. 155, denying writ of error in (Tex. Civ. App.) 290 S. W. 769; Citizens’ State Bank v. Alexander (Tex. Civ. App.) 274 S. W. 184.

The judgment will be reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions to the trial court to transfer same in accordance with the plea of privilege filed.

Reversed and remanded, with instructions.