Case ID: so3d_114/html/0422-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Fernando TROCHE-VAZQUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 5D12-4367.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    May 31, 2013.
    Fernando Troche-Vazquez, Lake City, pro se.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Fernando Troche-Vazquez (defendant) appeals the order entered by the trial court denying his rule 3.800(a) motion claiming additional jail credit. The defendant has failed to present a facially sufficient claim since the alleged additional credit cannot be ascertained from the face of the record. See Cabrera v. State, 62 So.3d 1171 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order without prejudice to the defendant’s presenting his claim in a rule 3.850 motion.

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur. 
      
      . See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a).
     
      
      . We note that the Florida Supreme Court has recently adopted a new procedure for seeking corrective jail credit, rule 3.801 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, effective July 1, 2013. Rule 3.801 requires motions for jail credit to be filed within one year of the date a sentence becomes final. We express no opinion as to the effect of the new rule on claims that would have been timely under rule 3.850’s filing limit but will be untimely under the new one-year filing limit.