Case ID: ad_214/html/0733-10.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Julia G. Devine, Appellant, v. Maurice C. Devine, Respondent.
   Orders reversed upon the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. We .think the delay of plaintiff in making tl-is motion was satisfactorily explained in her affidavits presented on the motion to renew. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents and votes to affirm on the ground that plaintiff’s failure to proceed with the trial of her action for the long period of time since its commencement shows such a lack of merit as justified the denial of her motion.