Case ID: so2d_522/html/0101-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Chris Scott PERILLO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 87-1793.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 22, 1988.
    Thornton & Rothman and John Thornton, Miami, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Mark S. Dunn, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
    Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

A trial court may not use as a reason to enhance a criminal sentence an element that has already been factored into the sentencing guidelines. State v. Mischler, 488 So.2d 523 (Fla.1986). Therefore, the sentence under review is reversed with directions to resentence the defendant within the appropriate guidelines.

Reversed and remanded with directions.