Case ID: so3d_174/html/0574-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Benjamin MENDOZA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D14-1227.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Sept. 2, 2015.
    Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Lesley N. Clark, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allen R. Geesey, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the convictions entered in this case. The arresting officer had probable cause to stop appellant pursuant to section 316.0875, Florida Statutes (2013). See Lomax v. State, 148 So.3d 119, 121 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). The later search of the defendant falls under the inevitable discovery doctrine. Having made a valid stop, the officer would have asked appellant for his driver’s license, which would have led to the discovery that it was revoked and to his arrest and the subsequent search. See Hatcher v. State, 834 So.2d 314, 317-18 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Cummings v. State, 956 So.2d 559, 560-61 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.