Case ID: f-appx_47/html/0207-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mark C. LOVE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph F. MURPHY, Jr.; Deborah S. Eyler; Arrie W. Davis; Peter B. Krauser, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 02-1415.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 9, 2002.
    Decided Sept. 11, 2002.
    Mark C. Love, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Mark C. Love appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for temporary and permanent injunctive relief and subsequent dismissal of his civil action. We have reviewed the record, Love’s brief, and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Love v. Murphy, No. CA-02-682-CCB (D. Md. Mar. 8 & Apr. 1, 2002). We deny Love’s request for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.