Case ID: f2d_458/html/0037-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John William BULLOCK et al., Defendants-Appellants.
    No. 71-3470
    Summary Calendar.*
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    May 1, 1972.
    Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 
      
      . Appellant contended that: 1) the evidence was insufficient for the jury to have inferred the existence of an unlawful agreement; 2) there was improper venue and a lack of jurisdiction; 3) the charge did not sufficiently instruct the jury to consider each defendant separately; and 4) a preliminary instruction to the jury that once there is some evidence of conspiracy, hearsay of co-conspirators may be admissible, amounted to an instruction, as a matter of law, that there was evidence of a conspiracy. We have considered all these specifications of error and find them to be without merit.
     
      
      . See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5 Cir. 1970).