Case ID: ala-app_16/html/0469-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BRICKEN, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(79 South. 143)
    MULLINAX v. STATE.
    (7 Div. 539.)
    (Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    June 29, 1918.)
    Criminal Law <&wkey;1094 — Appeal — Matters Review able.
    Where no bills of exception have been filed, conviction will be affirmed, where no error is apparent in the record.
    Appeal from Circuit Court, Etowah County; J. E. Blackwood, Judge.
    Gus Mullinax was convicted for buying, receiving, concealing, etc., stolen property, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    J. S. Franklin, of Gadsden, for appellant. F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., for the State.
   BRICKEN, J.

The defendant was indicted for grand larceny, and for buying, receiving, concealing, etc., stolen property, (felony), was convicted for the latter offense, and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of five years.

This appeal is on the record proper, without a bill of exceptions, and shows regular proceedings and judgment of conviction, finding the defendant guilty as above, following the verdict of the jury. The record also shows a sentence imposed upon the defendant, sentencing him to a term of imimprisonment in the penitentiary as provided by law. The certificate of the trial judge shows that the time for filing a bill of exceptions expired, and none has been presented or filed.

■ There is no error apparent in the record; therefore the judgment of conviction is affirmed. (

Affirmed.