Case ID: ad_235/html/0683-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Farbro Corporation, Respondent, v. A. F. A. Realty Corporation, Appellant, and Others, Defendants.
   -Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur: Lazansky, P. J., dissents on the ground that section 586 of the Civil Practice Act does not apply to an action brought by a vendor who has obtained a judgment of specific performance nor to a case where it is brought to impress a vendee’s hen upon real estate that he contracted to buy.