Case ID: nj-misc_7/html/0501-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NAHM TARZY, PLAINTIFF, v. UNITED PIECE DYE WORKS, DEFENDANT.
    Submitted January term, 1929
    Decided May 7, 1929.
    Before Justices Black, Campbell and Case.
    For the rule, John W. Ochford.
    
    
      Contra, Kellogg & Chance.
    
   Pee Curiam.

In an action for negligence the defendant has a verdict, and under this rule the plaintiff seeks to set it aside for the reasons:

1. It is against the weight of the evidence.

2. It is contrary to the charge of the court.

3. It indicates prejudice and partiality.

There was a fair dispute of facts presented by the proofs and our examination thereof does not bring us to the conclusion that the verdict was the result of mistake, prejudice or passion, and therefore the rule to show cause is discharged, with costs.