Case ID: so2d_454/html/0984-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edna Ruth STEPHENS v. Charles A. RUSH.
    83-651.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    July 20, 1984.
    W.M. Beck, Sr. of Beck & Beck, Fort Payne, for appellant.
    Stephen P. Bussman, Fort Payne, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed as to Issue No. 1 (failure to plead adverse possessior) on the authority of A.R.Civ.P. 15(b) and Bischoff v. Thomasson, 400 So.2d 359 (Ala.1981); affirmed as to Issue No. 2 (sufficiency of the evidence to support claim of adverse possession) or the authority of Code 1975, § 6-5-200, et seq., and Hand v. Stanard, 392 So.2d 1157 (Ala.1980).

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.