Case ID: f_178/html/1006-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. PER CÜRIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES v. TIFFANY & CO.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    April 4, 1910.
    On Petition for Rehearing, June 6, 1910.)
    No. 184 (5,454).
    Appeal from the Circuit Court of the JDnited States for the Southern District of New York.
    For decision below, see 172 Fed. 300, affirming a decision by the Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 6.864 (T. D. 29,542), which had reversed the assessment of duty by the collector of customs at the port of New York.
    D. Frank Lloyd, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Charles Duane Baker, Sp. Atty., of counsel), for the United States. Arthur M. King, for. appellees.
    Before WARD, and NOYES,. Circuit Judges, and HOLT, District Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

We come to the same conclusion in this case as in our former decision in Citroen v. U. S., 92 C. C. A. 365, 166 Fed. 693. Judgment affirmed.

On petition for rehearing or íot special leave to file a petition, for rehearing at -a later term of the court, under rule 29 (150 Fed. xxxiv, 79 C. C. A. xxxiv).

PER CÜRIAM.

Petition denied.