Case ID: nj-eq_114/html/0043-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edward H. Barnett, complainant, v. Schickerling Products Corporation, defendant.
    [Decided September 27th, 1933.]
    
      Mr. Merritt Lane, for the complainant.
    
      Mr. Henry Gottfried, Mr. Frederick J. Israel and Mr. Herbert L. Flins, for the defendant.
   Per Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 112 N. J. Eq. 1.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfteld, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.