Case ID: f-appx_468/html/0338-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael L. ATWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 11-2187.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 24, 2012.
    Decided: March 1, 2012.
    Michael L. Atwell, Appellant Pro Se. Emmett F. McGee, Jr., Eileen Carr Riley, Jackson Lewis, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael L. Atwell appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on his employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Atwell’s pending motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Atwell v. Am. Sugar Refining, Inc., No. 1:10-cv-01378-WMN, 2011 WL 4501288 (D.Md. Sept. 27, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.