Case ID: ny_151/html/0623-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bridget McCruden, Respondent, v. The Rochester Railway Company, Appellant.
    
      McCruden v. Rochester Ry. Oo., 77 Hun, 609, affirmed.
    (Argued October 21, 1896;
    decided December 1, 1896.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered April 13, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial upon the minutes, and also affirmed an order granting a motion for judgment for treble damages.
    
      Charles J. Bissell for appellant.
    
      Thomas Raines for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.

All concur, except Haight, J., not sitting, and Mastín, J., not voting.