Case ID: mich_150/html/0105-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Grant, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HENDERSON v. GRAND RAPIDS ACCIDENT & HEALTH INSURANCE CO.
    -Life Insurance — Premiums — Default of Payment — Forfeiture. »
    Failure of Insured to make a monthly payment on a life-insurance policy does not work a forfeiture, where, at the issuing •of the policy, the agent stated that the company would send a collector to the insured’s house each month, to whom the monthly payment should he made, and the -insured had the money ready for the collector, who failed to come, and no notification was received that payments should or might be made elsewhere. Baker v. Protective Ass’n, 118 Mich. 481, followed.
    Error to Kent; Wolcott, J.
    Submitted October 22, 1907.
    (Docket No. 114.)
    Decided November 5, 1907.
    Assumpsit by Mary E. Henderson against the Grand Rapids Accident & Health Insurance Company on a policy of insurance. There was judgment for plaintiff, and .defendant brings error.
    Affirmed.
    
      McKnight & McAllister, for appellant.
    
      John J. McKenna, for appellee.
   Grant, J.

The facts in Baker v. Protective Ass’n, 118 Mich. 431, are so similar to those in this case as to render a statement unnecessary. This case is ruled by that against the contention of the defendant, and the judgment is affirmed.

Blair, Montgomery, Ostrander, and Hooker, JJ., .concurred.