Case ID: f-appx_714/html/0260-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Erick Aldair PORTILLO-SANCHEZ, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Respondent.
    No. 16-1741
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 30, 2017
    Decided: March 9, 2018
    Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Jessie M. Bless, Senior Litigation Counsel, Colette J. Winston, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Erick Aldair Portillo-Sanchez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and Portillo-Sanchez’s claims and conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B)(2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Portillo-Sanchez (B.I.A. June 7, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the.facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED