Case ID: sw3d_524/html/0067-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Herman LOGAN, Appellant, v. Matthew KAEMPFE, et al., Respondents.
    No. ED 104452
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    Filed: February 28, 2017
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 10, 2017
    Richard J. Magee, Clayton, MO, for Appellant.
    Ira M. Potter, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
    Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Lisa Van Amburg, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Herman Logan (“Appellant”) appeals from the judgment dismissing his claims against defendant Everbank and individual defendants, Andrea . Marx, Roger McGaugh, and Matthew Kaempfe (collectively “Respondents”), Appellant claims the trial court erred in dismissing his cause without prejudice as a sanction for discovery and court order. violations because such dismissal effectively terminated Appellant’s cause of action and Appellant did not have sufficient notice to prevent such dismissal. Appellant further claims that the trial court erred in not enforcing a settlement. agreement prior, to dismissal.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the Appellant’s claims of error to be without merit, and we affirm. We further deny Respondents’ motions to dismiss the appeal and for sanctions.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).