Case ID: f-appx_474/html/0976-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bradley Shane SHEPPARD, Petitioner—Appellant, v. WARDEN OF FCI ESTILL, Respondent—Appellee, and United States of America, Respondent.
    No. 12-6603.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 26, 2012.
    Decided: Aug. 2, 2012.
    Bradley Shane Sheppard, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bradley Shane Sheppard, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order construing his post-judgment motion as a Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sheppard v. Warden of FCI Estill, No. 1:10-cv-03220-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 19, 2012). Further, we deny Sheppard’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.