Case ID: f-appx_570/html/0315-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronnie Lynn MOSS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. MAXIMUS FEDERAL SERVICES; Department of Health and Human Services; Today’s Options, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 13-2469.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 18, 2014.
    Decided: May 2, 2014.
    Ronnie Lynn Moss, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Lynn Moss seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice the particularized complaint he filed in his challenge to the denial of a Medicare claim. The complaint was dismissed after Moss failed to comply with the court’s direction to allege additional facts and provide documentation demonstrating his exhaustion of administrative remedies. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Moss seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order, as Moss may be able to save his action by filing an amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified by the district court. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.