Case ID: f_72/html/0688-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LOO WAY v. UNITED STATES.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    February 3, 1896.)
    No. 248.
    In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California.
    This was a proceeding by arrest to determine the right of Loo Way, a Chinaman, to remain in the United States. The circuit court commissioner found the facts as charged, and ordered his removal. This order was affirmed by the district court. 68 Fed. 475. Defendant brings error.
    Haines & Ward, for plaintiff in error.
    Henry S. Foote, for the United States.
    Before MeKENNA and GILBERT, Circuit Judges, and HAWLEY, District Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

The facts of the case are fully stated by the learned judge who tried the case in the district court, and, for the reasons and authorities (to the latter it is only necessary to add Lai Moy v. U. S., 14 C. C. A. 283, 66 Fed. 955, and Lew Jim v. U. S., 14 C. C. A. 281, 66 Fed. 953, decided by this court) expressed and cited by him, the judgment is affirmed.