Case ID: ny-2d_70/html/0768-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Genevieve Arnault Jackson, Also Known as Genevieve H. Jackson, Appellant.
    Argued September 4, 1987;
    decided October 8, 1987
    APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      John J. Hayden for appellant.
    
      
      Francis D. Phillips, II, District Attorney (Barbara J. Strauss of counsel), for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s primary argument in this court is that her conviction must be reversed because she was denied effective assistance of counsel during the trial. After examining the record and viewing the evidence, law and circumstances of the case in totality, we conclude defendant’s allegations of counsel’s ineffectiveness are not supported by the record and she was not denied meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146-147).

We concur with the Appellate Division’s disposition of defendant’s remaining contentions (see, 121 AD2d 743).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur; Judge Titone taking no part.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.