Case ID: cal-app_44/html/0790-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WASTE, P. J. \n      THE COURT.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[Civ. No. 2932.
    First Appellate District, Division One.
    November 3, 1919.]
    GREAT WESTERN LUMBER COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA CANNERIES COMPANY (a Corporation), Respondent.
    
       Pleading — Contracts — Condition Precedent. — Judgment affirmed on the authority of California Canneries Co. v. Great Western Lumber Co., ante, p. 69.
    APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. E. P. Shortall, Judge.
    Affirmed.
    The issues involved in this appeal are identical with those in California Canneries Co. v. Great Western Lumber Co., ante, p. 69, [185 Pac. 1008].
    Marcel E. Cerf and C. H. Sooy for Appellant.
    John R. Jones for Respondent.
   WASTE, P. J.

[1] The issues involved in this appeal are identical with those in California Canneries Co. v. Great Western Lumber Co., ante, p. 69, [185 Pac. 1008], By stipulation of the parties the result of that action was embodied in findings and judgment in this cause without a separate trial. The records were presented here in one transcript on appeal.

On the authority of the decision in that case the judgment is affirmed.

Richards, J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on December 2, 1919, and the following opinion then rendered thereon:

THE COURT.

The reasons given in denying the petition for a rehearing in California Canneries Co. v. Great Western Lumber Co., ante, p. 69, [185 Pac. 1008], apply to this, the companion case.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on January 2, 1920.

All the Justices concurred.