Case ID: nys_152/html/1126-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. INGRAHAM, P. J. (dissenting).", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

McLEAN, Respondent, v. STUDEBAKER BROS. CO. OF NEW YORK, Appellant.
    (No. 7056.)
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    April 23, 1915.)
    Appeal from Trial Term, New York County. Action by William McLean against the Studebaker Bros. Company of New York. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals. Affirmed. Clayton J. Heermance, of New York City, for appellant. William F. Purdy; of New York City, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed.

INGRAHAM, P. J. (dissenting).

The plaintiff was not in the employ of the defendant, but in the employ of one who was working for the defendant under an independent contract. In the course of this work he fell off a ladder not furnished by the defendant. The defendant gave no directions as to how the work should be done, and, so far as appears, had no knowledge that the plaintiff wa.s about to work at this particular fan light or window at the time of the accident. Unless it was the duty of the defendant to keep this fan light bolted at all times, I do not see how it would be negligence to have it unbolted at the time the plaintiff selected for cleaning it. I think there is not the slightest proof that the defendant was negligent, or that the accident resulted from any ■ lack of care of the defendant or its employes. I think, therefore, the judgment should be reversed, and the complaint dismissed.

HOTCHKISS, J., concurs.