Case ID: f-appx_142/html/0174-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner — Appellee, v. Kenneth N. ZARSKA, Respondent— Appellant.
    No. 05-1153.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 25, 2005.
    Decided: Aug. 30, 2005.
    Kenneth N. Zarska, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    
      Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Kenneth N. Zarska appeals from the district court’s orders: (1) denying his motions to quash a summons issued by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and to dismiss the IRS’s action to enforce the summons, and (2) dismissing the enforcement action on the IRS’s motion after Zarska complied with the summons. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Zarska, No. MISC-04-50 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 10, 2004, Dec. 30, 2004 & Feb. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED