Case ID: ill-app_195/html/0375-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Barnes", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Panagiotis Zisinatos and Andreas Galineas, Appellees, v. Continental & Commercial National Bank and Anton J. Cermak, Bailiff, Appellants.
    Gen. No. 22,017.
    (Not to be reported in full.)
    Abstract of the Decision.
    1. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 10
      
      —when action for trial of ■right to property is of fourth class. A proceeding for the trial of the right to property is an action of the fourth class under the Municipal Court Act, sec. 2, subd. 4 (d) (J. & A. 3314).
    2. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 27
      
      —when extension of time for filing hill of exceptions not in apt time. Where it appears that an extension of the time for filing a bill of exceptions in a fourth-class action under section 2, subd. 4 (d) of the Municipal Court Act (J. & A. If 3314) was not made within thirty days from ttie rendition of the judgment appealed from, the Appellate Court will strike the bill of exceptions on motion of appellee, for the reason that an extension of such filing time is not allowed except within thirty days from the rendition of such judgment.
    Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. R. F. Robinson, Judge, presiding.
    Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1915.
    Appeal dismissed.
    Opinion filed November 16, 1915.
    Statement of the Case.
    Action by Panagiotis Zisinatos and Andreas Galineas, plaintiffs, against the Continental & Commercial National Bank and Anton J. Cermak, bailiff of the Municipal Court of Chicago, defendants, in the Municipal Court of Chicago. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.
    Mayer, Meyer, Austrian & Platt, for appellants.
    G. A. Buresh, for appellees.
    
      
      See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.
    
   Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 24 —when judgment not appeal-able. There being no statute authorizing an appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago in a fourth-class case, an appeal cannot be taken in such case, and if taken will be dismissed.