Case ID: f-appx_78/html/0169-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stanley J. SHAFTEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Aly S. DADRAS, Defendant-Appellee.
    Docket No. 02-9391.
    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    Oct. 17, 2003.
    
      Esther G. Dinovitser, Law Office of Esther G. Dinovitser, Great Neck, NY, for Appellant.
    Andrew N. Krinsky, Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP (Richard S. Ciacci, of counsel), New York, NY, for Appellee.
    PRESENT: LEVAL, SACK, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN, District Judge.
    
      
       Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.
    
   SUMMARY ORDER

Stanley J. Shaftel appeals from a judgment of the district court issued July 22, 2002, following a bench trial. (A 123) On the appeal of a judgment after a bench trial, we review the district court’s factual findings for clear error, Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a); White v. White Rose Food, 237 F.3d 174, 178 (2d Cir.2001), and its conclusions of law de novo, United States v. Coppola, 85 F.3d 1015, 1019 (2d Cir.1996). In this appeal, Shaftel challenges only the district court’s findings of fact, particularly its credibility determinations. We have no basis for concluding that those findings were clearly erroneous.

The judgment of the district court is therefore hereby AFFIRMED.