Case ID: f-appx_291/html/0841-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arif Ali DURRANI, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-55086.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.
    
    Filed Sept. 4, 2008.
    Leah R. Bussell, Esq., USSD — Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Arif Ali Durrani, FCIV — Federal Correctional Institution (Victorville) Medium I, Adelanto, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds (his case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Arif Ali Durrani appeals pro se from the district court’s December 19, 2006, order directing the United States Marshal to sell various aircraft components seized pursuant to writs of execution. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Durrani contends that the district court’s order deprives him of his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights to retain the attorneys of his choice to assist him in pending litigation. This contention lacks merit. See Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United States, 491 U.S. 617, 624-33, 109 S.Ct. 2646, 105 L.Ed.2d 528 (1989).

Durrani’s remaining contentions similarly lack merit.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.