Case ID: f-appx_521/html/0928-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED and The Regents of the University of California, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMAZON.COM, INC., and Yahoo! Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and Google Inc., and Youtube, LLC, Defendants-Appellees, and J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 2012-1632.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    July 22, 2013.
    Mike McKool Jr., McKool Smith, P.C., of Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Douglas A. Cawley, of Dallas, TX, and Kevin L. Burgess, John B. Campbell and Joel L. Thollander, of Austin, TX.
    Daryl L. Joseffer, King & Spalding LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was Adam Conrad, for all defendants-ap-pellees. Of counsel on the brief were Douglas E. Lumish, Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP, of Redwood Shores, CA, for defendants-appellees, Google Inc., et al.; Diane K. Lettelleir, J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., Plano, TX, for defendant-appellee for J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.; Edward R. Reines, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, of Redwood Shores, CA, and Jennifer H. Doan, Haltom & Doan, of Texarkana, TX, for defendants-appellees Amazon.com, Inc., et al.; Kevin T. Kramer, Yahoo! Inc., of Sunnyvale, CA, for defendant-appellee, Yahoo! Inc.; and Jeffrey H. Dean, Amazon.com, Inc., of Seattle, WA, for defendant-appellee, Amazon.com, Inc.
    NEWMAN, BRYSON, and PROST, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.