Case ID: ohio-cc-dec_17/html/0496-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ENTAILED ESTATES — APPEALS.
    [Hamilton (1st) Circuit Court,
    1905.]
    Jelke, Swing and Giffen, JJ.,
    Augustus S. Ludlow v. Eliza L. Moore.
    Confirmation of Investment of Proceeds of Sale of Entailed Estate, a Pinal Order, within Purview of the Statute.
    An order confirming the report of a trustee as to the investment or other disposition of the proceeds from the sale of an entailed estate, under favor ' of Lan. R. L. 9340 to 9351 (R. S. 5803 to 5813), is a final order in a civil action in which the right of trial by jury does not exist, and is therefore appealable.
    Motion to dismiss appeal.
    A. S. Ludlow, for plaintiff.
    J. S. Connor, M. R. Waite, Boyce & Boyd and L. M. Mongan, for various defendants.
   PER CURIAM.

Laning R. L. 9340 to 9351 (R. S. 5803 and 5813), provide not only for the sale of entailed estates, but for the investment of the proceeds by a trustee under the direction and approval of the court, and an order confirming the report of the trustee, which shows the investment or other disposition of substantially all of the proceeds of sale, is a final order in a civil action in which the right to demand a jury does not exist and is therefore appealable. Spence v. Basey, 34 Ohio St. 42; Eaton & H. Ry. v. Varnum, 10 Ohio St. 622.

Motion to dismiss appeal overruled.