Case ID: f-appx_320/html/0626-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael F. SCHULZE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Paul SCHULTZ, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 07-15946.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 18, 2009.
    
    Filed March 25, 2009.
    Michael F. Schulze, Ewa Beach, HI, Petitioner-Appellant.
    Bureau Of Prisons, Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Dublin, CA, Thomas E. Flynn, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
    Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Federal prisoner Michael F. Schulze appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we affirm.

Schulze contends that the district court erred by determining that “some evidence” supports the prison disciplinary hearing officer’s determination that he possessed morphine. We conclude that the district court did not err. See Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 454-56, 105 S.Ct. 2768, 86 L.Ed.2d 356 (1985).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.