Case ID: sw_206/html/0927-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PHILLIPS, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FIRST STATE BANK OF TOM BALL v. TINKHAM et ux.
    (No. 3059.)
    (Supreme Court of Texas.
    Dec. 2, 1918.)
    Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Ninth Supreme Judicial District.
    Suit by the First State Bank of Tom Ball against George F. Tinkham and wife. Judgment, giving plaintiff partial relief, was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals (195 S. W. 880), and plaintiff brings error.
    Affirmed.
    Thos. H. Ball, of Houston, for plaintiff in error.
    Fisher, Campbell & Amerman, of Houston, for defendants in error.
   PHILLIPS, C. J.

The main question in this ease is that determined in Red River National Bank v. Ferguson, 206 S. W. 923. The ease is accordingly ruled by that decision.

The judgments of the District Court and Court of Civil Appeals are affirmed.