Case ID: f-appx_473/html/0271-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary Roslyn MIXON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 11-2259.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 24, 2012.
    Decided: May 30, 2012.
    Mary Roslyn Mixon, Appellant pro se. Mary H. Crosby, Stacy Kaplan Wood, Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Mary Roslyn Mixon appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, granting the Defendant’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion and dismissing her employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mixon v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schs., No. 3:11-cv-00228-MOC-DSC, 2011 WL 5075622 (W.D.N.C, Oct. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.