Case ID: so2d_390/html/0483-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. ANSTEAD, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Johnny YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 79-2043.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Nov. 26, 1980.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and . Robert L. Bogen, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises three points on appeal. As to his first two points, we affirm. The third point is that the written order of revocation of probation recites a violation; namely, giving false information to a police officer, which was not considered by the trial court at the revocation hearing. The state concurs that this was error.

Accordingly, we affirm in part and reverse in part and remand to the trial court with directions that the third alleged violation be stricken from the written order of revocation of probation.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

MOORE and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., dissents with opinion.

ANSTEAD, Judge,

dissenting:

I agree that the order of revocation should be affirmed. However, I also believe that another of the alleged violations, that of possession of stolen property, should be stricken, since the state conceded at the revocation hearing that proof of this charge was predicated entirely upon hearsay testimony.