Case ID: f-appx_171/html/0106-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jesus AYALA-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 04-72878.
    Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 8, 2006.
    
    Decided March 14, 2006.
    Debra A. Morales, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.
    Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Carl H. McIntyre, Jr., Susan K. Houser, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before CANBY, BEEZER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jesus Ayala-Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision adopting and affirming an immigration judge’s decision pretermitting his application for cancellation of removal for failure to meet the continuous physical presence requirement. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.

Ayala-Hernandez left the United States in 1999. Later that year, he attempted to reenter with false documents. He was found inadmissible and was ordered removed and prohibited from reentering for five years. This expedited removal interrupted Ayala-Hernandez’s continuous physical presence. See Vasquez-Lopez v. Ashcroft, 343 F.3d 961, (9th Cir.2003) (per curiam) (voluntary departure under threat of deportation or removal interrupts continuous physical presence).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.