Case ID: sw2d_943/html/0338-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Sterling EDWARDS, Defendant/Appellant. Sterling EDWARDS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    Nos. 68406, 70483.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    April 8, 1997.
    Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for defendant/appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Gregory L. Barnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

After the defendant was convicted of attempted forcible rape, § 566.030, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1994, he was sentenced by the court as a persistent offender to consecutive terms of twenty five and ten years. He filed a motion under Rule 29.15 which was overruled. He appeals, but raises no points of error relating to the 29.15 motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).