Case ID: pa-super_19/html/0494-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      W. D. Porter,. J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Baltzell, Appellant, v. Cook.
    Argued Nov. 8, 1901.
    Appeal, No, 229, Oct. T., 19.Q1, by plaintiffs-,, f-r,om judgment of C. P. Blair Go.,, Oct., T., 1899, No. 1.53,. for defendants,, non obstante veredicto in cas.e of Charles, E>. Baltzell and J.. T. Baltzell,. Jr., trading as Baltzell. Brothers,, v.. Lucius W. Cook.
    Before Rice, P, J., Beaver,, Oreaba,, W..W. Porter and W. P. Porter, JJ.
    Reversed..
    
      Thomas M- Grreeyy, for appellant.
    
      J., S. Teiseminy,, for appellee,.
    March 14, 1902:
   Qririor- bv

W. D. Porter,. J.,

This record presents; the. same questions which are discussed in the opinion this, day filed in the appeal No, 21.9,. October term,. 1901,, of this court, and the parties, to. the litigation are identical.

The judgment is reversed, and a venire, facias de novo, awarded.