Case ID: kan_73/html/0794-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The City of Liberty v. H. N. Bundy and John Hill.
    No. 14,525.
    (83 Pac. 1116.)
    Appeal from Montgomery district court; Thomas J. Flannelly, judge.
    Opinion filed March 10, 1906.
    Reversed.
    
      Dooley & Keith, for appellants.
   Per Curiam:

This is an appeal from a conviction under a city ordinance the validity of which is assailed under the rule announced in In re Van Tuyl, 71 Kan. 659, 81 Pac. 181. The city has filed- no brief, from which fact we assume that it is admitted that the ordinance is void under that decision. The judgment appealed from is therefore reversed.