Case ID: so2d_568/html/1280-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kaye PEARSON and Yachting Promotions, Inc., Appellants, v. SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY, LBE Marine, Inc., Helen Lewis, Robert Compton, Alfred J. Behrendt, Jr., and Tammy Behrendt, Appellees.
    No. 88-2648.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Sept. 19, 1990.
    Rehearing Denied Nov. 30, 1990.
    
      Richard A. Sherman and Rosemary B. Wilder of Law Offices of Richard A. Sherman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
    McCune, Hiaasen, Crum, Gardner & Duke, P.A. (withdrawn as counsel after filing brief), and Harry S. Raleigh of Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Seaboard Sur. Co.
    Paul R. Regensdorf of Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees Helen Lewis and Robert Compton.
    L. Anton Rebalko, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees LBE Marine and Alfred J. Beh-rendt, Jr.
   ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING AND/OR CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

The following parties have moved for rehearing and/or clarification of our opinion dated May 30, 1990: appellants Kaye Pearson and Yachting Promotions, Inc., ap-pellee Seaboard Surety Company, and ap-pellees Helen Lewis and Robert Compton. We grant the motion in part, and therefore withdraw our opinion appearing in Kaye Pearson and Yachting Promotions, Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Company, 15 F.L.W. 1462 (Fla. 4th DCA May 30, 1990), and substitute the following.

We characterize the proceedings below as essentially a contract dispute among the promoters and participants in a commercial boat show held in Broward County, Florida. The various complaints involve numerous alleged causes of action concerning numerous plaintiffs and defendants. The crux of our decision is founded on the fact that there is still considerable judicial labor to be performed in the trial court, concerning some of those parties and some of those issues. However, as to appellant Kaye Pearson and appellee Seaboard Surety Company, we find that the judgments of the trial court are final judgments disposing of all issues against Pearson and in favor of Seaboard. Those judgments are affirmed.

As to the remaining parties and issues, having heard oral argument, and after considering Mendez v. West Flagler Association, Inc., 303 So.2d 1 (Fla.1974), we dismiss the remainder of the appeal.

ANSTEAD, STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.