Case ID: so2d_721/html/0424-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frederick C. DAVIS, Appellant, v. Erin P. DAVIS, Appellee.
    No. 97-4674.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Nov. 30, 1998.
    Justin Haberski, Pensacola, for Appellant.
    Laura E. Keene of Beroset & Keene, Pensacola, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

With regard to rehabilitative alimony and distribution of property, we find the final judgment adequate to allow meaningful appellate review, and we affirm. Appellant also questions the order requiring him to pay seventy percent of appellee’s attorneys’ fees. Because no actual award of fees has been made, this question is not ripe for appellate review.

AFFIRMED.

JOANOS, KAHN and DAVIS, concur.