Case ID: ohio-st-3d_85/html/1213-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Takach, Appellant, v. American Medical Technology, Inc. et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as Takach v. Am. Med. Technology, Inc. (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 1213.]
    (No. 98-1020
    Submitted March 30, 1999
    Decided May 12, 1999.)
    
      Lancione & Simon, P.L.L., Ellen S. Simon, Cathleen M. Bolek and Christopher P. Thorman, for appellant.'
    
      Walter & Haverfield, P.L.L., Michael T. McMenamin, Nancy A. Noall and Vincent L. Cheverine, for appellees.
    
      Louis A. Jacobs; Spater, Gittes, Schulte & Kolman and Frederick M. Gittes, urging reversal for amici curiae, Ohio Employment Lawyers Association, Committee Against Sexual Harassment, Ohio Chapter of the National Organization of Women, Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers, Ohio Civil Rights Coalition, NOW Legal & Education Fund, and Ohio Citizen Action.
   The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas, J., dissents.

F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.