Case ID: f-appx_84/html/0299-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joshua FLUELLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Franklin M. EPSTEIN, Neurosurgeon at Aiken Regional Medical Center; L. Guevara, Assistant Health Service Administrator at FCI-Edgefield; J.A. Serrano, MD and Clinical Director at FCI-Edgefield; Fuertes Rosario, Health Service Administrator at Fci-Edgefield, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 03-7480.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 11, 2003.
    Decided Dec. 23, 2003.
    Joshua Fluellen, Appellant pro se. Richard Carson Thomas, Barnes, Alford, Stork & Johnson, Columbia, South Carolina; Raymond Emery Clark, Assistant United States Attorney, Barbara Murder Bowens, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM.

Joshua Fluellen appeals the district court’s order and judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing his claim of deliberate indifference to a serious medical need. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fluellen v. Epstein, No. CA-02-2091 (D.S.C. Aug. 21, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED