Case ID: ccpa_69/html/0085-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cubiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(Appeal No. 81-22)
    A. J. Arango, Inc. v. The United States
    (671 F. 2d 485)
    United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals,
    February 18, 1982,
    
      Herbert T. Posner, Esq., of New York, New York, attorney for appellant.
    
      J. Paul McGrath, Asst. Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director, Joseph I. Liebman, Attorney-in-charge, and Susan Handler-Menahem, of New York, New York, attorneys for appellee.
    [Oral argument on February 1, 1982 by Herbert T. Posner for appellant and Susan Handler-Menahem for appellee.]
    Before Mabkey, Chief Judge, Rich, Baldwin, Millee, and Nies, Associate Judges.
    
   Pee Cubiam.

This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade, 1 CIT 271, 517 F. Supp. 698 (1981), dismissing appellant’s complaint that certain torsionally soft couplings, classified as shaft couplings under item 680.50, Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), should be classified as parts of internal combustion engines under item 660.54, TSUS. After careful consideration of appellant’s arguments, we are in full agreement with the reasoning of the opinion of the Court of International Trade, and, accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.