Case ID: f-appx_208/html/0837-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

This case was not selected for publication in the Federal Reporter
    
    
      NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this order is not citable as precedent. It is a public order.
    
    LUMA CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STRYKER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 2006-1642.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    Oct. 23, 2006.
   ORDER

Upon consideration of Luma Corporation’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss its appeal, for lack of jurisdiction,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.