Case ID: sw2d_936/html/0235-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Danny NEAL, Defendant/Appellant. Danny NEAL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    Nos. 66057, 69736.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Dec. 17, 1996.
    John M. Schilmoeller, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Lisa A Fischer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of one count of trafficking drugs in the second degree, § 195.223, RSMo Supp. 1993. The court sentenced him in aeeor-dance with the jury’s assessment to a prison term of seven years. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Defendant does not address any points in his appeal to the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. Therefore, that appeal is considered abandoned. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).