Case ID: f-appx_279/html/0240-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Leon BROWN, a/k/a Amp, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-6277.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 22, 2008.
    Decided: May 30, 2008.
    Anthony Leon Brown, Appellant Pro Se. John Howarth Bennett, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Anthony Leon Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of its order refusing to compel specific performance of the Government’s Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Brown, No. 5:98-cr-00120-H-1 (E.D.N.C. filed Jan. 21, 2008; entered Jan. 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Because Brown's motion for reconsideration was filed December 5, 2007, see Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988), more than ten days after entry of the underlying order, only the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration is before the court. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e), 60(c); Fed.R.App. P. 4(a)(4)(A), 6(a).