Case ID: nj_130/html/0312-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. POLLOCK and GARIBALDI, JJ.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

613 A.2d 1162
    LACEY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LACEY TOWNSHIP EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Argued September 14, 1992
    Decided October 20, 1992.
    
      Arthur Stein argued the cause for appellant {Arthur Stein & Associates, attorneys; Maria Ann Stork and David A. Semanchik, on the brief).
    
      Joel D. Rosen argued the cause for respondent {Wills, O’Neill & Melik, attorneys; Arnold M. Melik, of counsel).
    
      
      Michael F. Kaelber, Associate Counsel, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae New Jersey School Boards Association (Sheila Dow Ford, Director, Legal Department, attorney).
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge D’Annunzio’s majority opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 259 N.J.Super. 397, 613 A.2d 1167 (1991).

POLLOCK and GARIBALDI, JJ.,

dissenting.

We would reverse, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Gruccio’s dissenting opinion, reported at 259 N.J.Super. 397, 400, 613 A.2d 1167, 1169 (1991).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, O’HERN and STEIN — 5.

For reversal — Justices POLLOCK and GARIBALDI — 2.