Case ID: ohio-st_156/html/0115-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Schwer, Admx., Appellee, v. The New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. Co., Appellant.
    (No. 32267
    Decided July 11, 1951.)
    
      
      Messrs. Harrison, Thomas, Spangenberg & Hull, Mr. Norman W. Shibley, and Mr. S, L. Heckman, for appellee.
    
      Messrs. Miller & Hornbeck, Mr. W. R. Price, and Mr. John H. Ritter, for appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The question presented is whether the action of the trial court in granting a new trial amounted to an abuse of discretion. Since the journal entry of the trial court granting the new trial does not disclose on what ground or grounds the motion was allowed, and an examination of the record fails to disclose an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Tart, Matthias, and Hart, JJ., concur.

Middleton, J., not participating.