Case ID: ad2d_228/html/0699-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Lake, Appellant.
    [644 NYS2d 974]
   Contrary to the defendant’s contention, we find that the jury verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Moreover, the defendant’s sentence was not excessive (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not require reversal. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.