Case ID: f-appx_332/html/0043-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Earl WILSON, Jr., a/k/a Robert Wilson, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-6107.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 28, 2009.
    Decided: June 8, 2009.
    
      Richard Earl Wilson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Wilson, Jr., appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wilson, No. 2:95-cr-00049-RBS-10 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 28, entered Oct. 30, 2008; filed Dec. 1, entered Dec. 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.