Case ID: f-appx_335/html/0662-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Roy WALLACE, Appellant, v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES; Mark Morehead, Health Services Administrator, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; Becker, Nurse, East Arkansas Regional Unit; Louis, Nurse, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; Perdue, Nurse, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; Greg Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; Wendy Kelly, Deputy Director of Medical Services, Arkansas Department of Correction, Appellees.
    No. 07-3754.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 19, 2009.
    Filed: June 9, 2009.
    Roy Wallace, Brickeys, AR, pro se.
    Warden-AR-East Arkansas, Arkansas Department of Correction, Brickeys, AR, for Appellant.
    
      Michelle Banks Odum, Humphries & Lewis, White Hall, AR, Ashley Argo Priest, Attorney General’s Office, Little Rock, AR, for Appellees.
    Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Roy Wallace appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, wherein he complained that he did not receive daily accu-checks to monitor his diabetes from September 2006 through January 2007, and that at some point he was without his oral diabetes medication. Defendants argued, among other things, that these claims had not been administratively exhausted. The district court granted summary judgment for defendants on the merits, and this appeal followed.

Upon de novo review, see Popoalii v. Corr. Med. Servs., 512 F.3d 488, 499 (8th Cir.2008), we conclude that the foregoing claims were not fully exhausted, and thus the lawsuit should have been dismissed for lack of administrative exhaustion. See Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 211, 219-20, 127 S.Ct. 910, 166 L.Ed.2d 798 (2007) (unexhausted claims cannot be brought in court or considered); Johnson v. Jones, 340 F.3d 624, 627 (8th Cir.2003) (inmate must exhaust available administrative remedies before filing suit; otherwise dismissal is mandatory).

Specifically, defendants introduced unre-butted evidence that, as of July 2007, Wallace’s only exhausted medical grievance addressed a period of sixteen days in August 2006 when he did not receive daily accu-checks. See Jones, 549 U.S. at 204, 127 S.Ct. 910 (exhaustion permits prison officials to resolve disputes concerning their responsibilities before being brought into court).

Accordingly, we affirm the grant of summary judgment on the basis of lack of administrative exhaustion, see Christoffersen v. Yellow Book USA, 536 F.3d 947, 949 (8th Cir.2008), and we modify the dismissal to be without prejudice, cf. Calico Trailer Mfg. Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 155 F.3d 976, 978 (8th Cir.1998) (in diversity worker’s compensation matter, affirming dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, but — “[consistent with exhaustion principles” — modifying dismissal to be without prejudice). 
      
      . The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
     
      
      . In resisting summary judgment below, Wallace indicated that the alleged problems with treating his diabetes were ongoing. He should remain mindful of the requirement to exhaust fully any future complaints regarding his medical care before filing suit in federal court.