Case ID: neb_181/html/0747-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Newton, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Valuation and Equalization of Real Property in the State of Nebraska for 1966. County of Perkins, appellant, v. State Board of Equalization and Assessment of the State of Nebraska, appellee.
    150 N. W. 2d 883
    Filed May 19, 1967.
    No. 36456.
    Frederick E. Wanek, for appellant.
    
      Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General, and Homer G. Hamilton, for appellee.
    Heard before White, C. J., Spencer, Boslaugh, Smith, McCown, and Newton, JJ., and White, District Judge.
   Newton, J.

This is an appeal from the State Board of Equalization and Assessment. It is the contention of appellant that both rural and urban lands in Perkins County were not properly equalized with such property in other Nebraska counties. S'ales-assessment ratios for Perkins County were: Rural 45.77 and urban 50.27.

It is not necessary to delve further into this case. The opinion rendered in the consolidated cases of S. K. “Bob” Hanna v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment, ante p. 725, 150 N. W. 2d 878, is determinative here and the action of appellee regarding the assessment of rural, urban, and suburban lands and improvements is reversed.

Reversed.

Smith and McCown, JJ., concur in result.