Case ID: f-appx_452/html/0348-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Teresa A. RATLEDGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, v. United States of America, Party-in-Interest.
    No. 11-1207.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 20, 2011.
    Decided: Oct. 24, 2011.
    
      Jay Ian Igiel, Nealon & Associates, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia; Howard N. Berliner, Berliner Law Firm, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Brian Z. Liss, SAIC, McLean, Virginia; Robert R. Sparks, Jr., Sparks & Craig, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Teresa A. Ratledge appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ratledge v. Science Applications Int’l Corp., No. 1:10-cv-00239-CMH-TCB, 2011 WL 652274 (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 10, 2011; entered Feb. 11, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.