Case ID: nj_12/html/0607-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PETER J. D’AMICO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
    Argued June 8, 1953
    Decided June 22, 1953.
    
      Mr. Verling C. Enteman argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. McCarter, English & Studer, attorneys; Mr. Stuart A. Young, Jr., of counsel).
    
      Mr. John A. Laird argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Roskein & Laird, attorneys).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the court below.

Burling, J., concurring in result.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Wachenfeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan — 6.

For reversal — Justice Oliphant — 1.