Case ID: f-appx_131/html/0592-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Robert Dale DAVIDSON, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 04-35585.
    D.C. Nos. CV-04-06209-MRH, CR-92-600007-MRH.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted May 9, 2005.
    
    Decided May 16, 2005.
    Sean Hoar, USEU—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Eugene, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Robert Dale Davidson, Sheridan, OR, pro se.
    Before PREGERSON, CANBY, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Robert Dale Davidson appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his “petition to dismiss indictment challenging jurisdiction of district court on fatally flawed filing of indictment pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b) and (a).”

Davidson has already filed several 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motions, and the factual predicate for the instant “petition” states a claim that is appropriate for § 2255 motion. Accordingly, the district court properly denied the petition as an unauthorized second or successive § 2255 motion, as required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(3) and 2255.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.