Case ID: so2d_751/html/0070-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lester SWARTZ, Appellant, v. LASTING IMPRESSIONS PICTURE SOAP, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.
    No. 98-2824.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Dec. 1, 1999.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 27, 2000.
    Lester Swartz, Deerfield Beach, pro se.
    Mitchell T. McRae, Boca Raton, and David B. Pakula of Fazio, Dawson, DiSal-vo, Cannon, Abers, Podrecca & Fazio, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Appellant’s first issue alleges error based on the trial court’s adoption of findings in an earlier proceeding before the Unemployment Appeals Commission. The record reflects that Appellant agreed to the court’s incorporating such findings and invited the error, if any, asserted on appeal. See Bould v. Touchette, 349 So.2d 1181 1186 (Fla.1977). As to all other issues, we also affirm.

STONE, GROSS, JJ„ and JULIAN, JOYCE A., Associate Judge, concur.