Case ID: nys_15/html/0976-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dugro, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gabrielson, Respondent, v. Waydell et al., Appellants.
    
      (Superior Court of New York, City, General Term.
    
    October 10, 1891.)
    Appeal from jury term.
    Action by Charles G. Gabrielson against Frederick Waydell and others.
    For opinion on motion to dismiss the complaint, see 14 N. Y. Supp. 125.
    Argued before Dugro and Gildersleeve, JJ.
    
      N. B. Hoxie, for appellants. George P. Gordel, for respondent.
   Dugro, J.

A careful examination of the case fails to disclose merit in exception taken at the trial. Tiie law applicable to the facts presented by the evidence was correctly stated at the trial by the learned judge who presided. The charge was full and fair, and afforded all needed protection to the rights of the parties. The motion for a new trial was properly denied. Delendants’ exceptions are overruled, and judgment is ordered for the plaintiff upon the verdict, with costs.