Case ID: so2d_627/html/1329-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eugene RACOND, Appellant, v. Caroline Steinberg RACOND, Appellee.
    No. 93-347.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 14, 1993.
    Abrams & Abrams, and Brenda M. Abrams, Coconut Grove, and Jeannie M. Et-ter, Miami, for appellant.
    Richard J. Burton, Dania, and Deborah Marks, North Miami, for appellee.
    Before HUBBART, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. We find no error in the trial court’s denial of the motion to set aside the dissolution agreement. As recognized by the trial court, counsel, and this court, appellant may seek modification of the agreement upon his retirement pursuant to section 61.14, Florida Statutes (1991).

Affirmed.