Case ID: misc_181/html/0007-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frances Marks, Trading as Paradise Paint & Wallpaper Company, Respondent, v. Cornwall Shipbuilding Co., Inc., et al., Appellants.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    October 25, 1943.
    
      
      Arthur J. Homans and Alexander Blumenthal for appellants.
    
      Hyman Borman for respondent.
   Memorándum

Per Curiam.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the facts and new trial granted, with costs to defendants to abide the event.

In the absence of any explanation by plaintiff of the written charge for a Smith moulder after the alleged agreement for substitution of an American moulder, the decision for plaintiff was against the weight of the evidence. Plaintiff’s contention that the City Court had no jurisdiction of the counterclaim is answered by section 18 of the New York City Court Act (L. 1926, ch. 539; amd. L. 1936, ch. 324).

MacCrate, McCooey and Steinbrink, JJ., concur.