Case ID: cust-ct_43/html/0293-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Rao, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 63201.
    protest 58/16438 (New York).
    Super Speed Printing Machinery, Inc. v. United States,
   Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of automatic feeders the same in all material respects as those the subject of John V. Carr & Son, Inc., et al. v. United States (40 Cust. Ct. 292, C.D. 1996), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.