Case ID: njl_84/html/0760-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF JERSEY CITY, RESPONDENT, v. BROOKLYN EASTERN DISTRICT TERMINAL, APPELLANT.
    Argued March 14, 1913
    Decided June 18, 1913.
    On appeal from the Hudson Circuit Court.
    For the plaintiff, James J. Murphy and Warren Dixon.
    
    For the defendant, Edwards & Smith and George Holmes.
    
   Per Curiam.

For the reasons given in the opinion filed in the case of Jersey City v. Washburn Bros. Co., cante p. 719, the judgment in this ease will be reversed to the end that a venire de novo may be awarded.

For affirmance — None.

For reversal — Ti-ie Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Congdon, White, Teri-iune, JJ. 13.