Case ID: f-appx_332/html/0599-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafael Cordaniez MILLIGAN, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-14684
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Aug. 19, 2009.
    Amy Lee Copeland, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Savannah, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Rafael Cordaniez Milligan, Edgefield, SC, pro se.
    Before BIRCH, CARNES and FAY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

John J. Pilcher, II, appointed counsel for Rafael Cordaniez Milligan, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Milligan’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.