Case ID: so2d_558/html/1134-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Louisiana v. Virgil SMITH.
    No. 90-KH-0241.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Feb. 5, 1990.
   In re Smith, Virgil; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 270-776 B.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for Boykin transcript and waiver of rights form he claims to have filed on or about October 31, 1989. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.