Case ID: f2d_185/html/0676-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Frank WALLACE and R. M. Makemson, doing business as Wallace and Wallace, a partnership, Appellees.
    No. 12529.
    United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
    Dec. 20, 1950.
    H. G. Morison, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frank E. Flynn, U. S. Atty., E. R. Thurman, Asst. S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., George A. Frult< Attorney, Dept, of Justice, Wash-ington, D. C., (Joseph M. Friedman, Sp. Asst to Atty- Gen., J- Gregory Bruce and John G. Roberts, Attorneys, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., of counsel) for appellant.
    Evans, Hull, Kitchel & Jenckes and Norman S. Hull, all of Phoenix, Ariz., for appellee.
    Before STEPHENS and HEALY, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed. See United States v. Pacific Fruit and Produce Co., 9 Cir., 1943, 138 F.2d 367, cf. Bolten v. General Motors Corp., 7 Cir., 1950, 180 F.2d 379.