Case ID: ga-app_38/html/0192-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodwobth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

18805.
    Rhyne et al. v. Moshell.
    Decided May 15, 1928.
    
      Whitalcer & Whitaker, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Finley & Henson, contra.
   Bloodwobth, J.

There is no merit in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial, and the court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff. Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Lulce, J., eoneur.