Case ID: f-appx_34/html/0124-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronald NELSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Steven J. GAL, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 02-6310.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted April 17, 2002.
    Decided May 9, 2002.
    
      Ronald Nelson, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Ronald Nelson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Nelson v. Gal, No. CA-01-4588-2-22-AJ (D.S.C. filed Jan. 30, entered Jan. 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.