Case ID: so2d_365/html/0667-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronald E. McCASKILL v. TEXACO, INC.
    77-664.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Dec. 22, 1978.
    William H. Saliba, Mobile, for appellant.
    David W. Green, Mobile, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

To prevail on appeal, under well-established rules of review, it is incumbent upon the aggrieved party to show manifest error below prejudicial to the Appellant’s substantial rights. Having carefully considered the entire record on appeal, along with the briefs and arguments of counsel, we find that the Appellant has not met this burden.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.