Case ID: ala-app_22/html/0687-11.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SAMPORD, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(116 So. 926)
    Hollis RAMSEY v. STATE.
    (4 Div. 381.)
    Court of Appeals of Alabama,
    May 8, 1928.
    W. L, Parks, Judge.
    D. Á. Baker, of Troy, for appellant.
    Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.
   SAMPORD, J.

Defendant was convicted on a charge of unlawfully possessing a still and appeals. We have read this reborden banc, and without entering into a detailed discussion of the testimony we are. clear to the conclusion that the state has utterly failed to meet the burden of proof resting upon it, and the 'Court should have given the general charge -for the defendant as requested -in writing. Por this error the judgment is reversed and the" cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.