Case ID: so2d_622/html/0162-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. ANSTEAD, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William P. MOHL, Appellant, v. Peter S. GALATI, D.P.M., Appellee.
    No. 92-1282.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Aug. 11, 1993.
    Roy D. Wasson, Miami, for appellant.
    Peter M. Commette, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

DELL, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN, J., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., dissents with opinion.

ANSTEAD, Judge,

dissenting.

I would reverse the dismissal for lack of prosecution, especially in view of the fact that the then pro se appellant was able to establish that he had submitted to a medical examination requested by the appellee during the period of alleged inactivity.