Case ID: f3d_260/html/1320-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

AT&T WIRELESS PCS INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ATLANTA, Atlanta City Council, Robb Pitts, Vern McCarty, Debi Starnes, et. al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 00-15885.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Aug. 10, 2001.
    G. Wayne Hillis, Jr., Erika C. Birg, Parker, Hudson, Rainer & Dobbs, Atlanta, GA, Carter G. Phillips, Sidley & Austin, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
   BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether rehearing en banc should be granted, and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.