Case ID: f-appx_401/html/0299-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. B.V.J., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 10-30047.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.
    
    Filed Oct. 28, 2010.
    Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Appellant, a juvenile, appeals from the sentence imposed following his true-plea to an act of juvenile delinquency, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 5031, that constituted aiding and abetting burglary, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2(a); 18 U.S.C. § 1153(a), (b). Appellant was sentenced to official detention for 14 months and to supervision following his release from official detention until his eighteenth birthday. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The record reflects that the district court conducted the requisite “assessment of the totality of the unique circumstances and rehabilitative needs” of appellant. United States v. Juvenile, 347 F.3d 778, 787 (9th Cir.2003). Appellant has not shown that the district court abused its discretion by failing to impose the “least restrictive means to accomplish [appellant’s] rehabilitation.” Id.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.