Case ID: ohio-st-3d_21/html/0015-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Russo.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Russo (1986), 21 Ohio St. 3d 15.]
    (D.D. No. 85-24
    Decided January 2, 1986.)
    
      
      Angelo J. Gagliardo, disciplinary counsel, and Mark H. Aultman, for relator.
    
      Paul H. Hentemann and Donald J. Huffman, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, findings of fact and conclusions of law of the board, this court determines that there are ample facts to justify the board’s findings that Russo violated DR 6-101(A)(3); 7-101(A)(l), (2) and (3); 7-102(A)(4), (5) and (6); 9-102(A) and (B); and 1-102(A)(3), (4), (5) and (6).

Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that Russo be permanently disbarred from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.