Case ID: so2d_627/html/0613-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

S.D., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 93-33.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 14, 1993.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Patti E. Phillips, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Mark C. Katzef, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

In accordance with the appellee’s appropriate concession, the adjudicatory order below shall be amended to reflect the trial judge’s oral pronouncement that the respondent was guilty of petit theft rather than grand theft as the order now erroneously states.