Case ID: f-appx_264/html/0660-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Angel RAYA-MENDOZA, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 07-10246.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 14, 2008 .
    Filed Jan. 22, 2008.
    Joseph A. Fazioli, USSJ-Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Jose, CA, for PlaintiffAppellee.
    Mark D. Eibert, Esq., Half Moon Bay, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: HALL, O’SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Angel Raya-Mendoza appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Raya-Mendoza contends that his sentence is unreasonable because he did not receive a larger downward adjustment for his relatively minor, non-violent criminal history. We disagree. The district court conducted a thorough analysis of the sentencing factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and we conclude that Raya-Mendoza’s sentence is not unreasonable. See Gall v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 597-98, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.