Case ID: ga-app_36/html/0214-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

17696.
    Thomas v. The State.
    Decided December 14, 1926.
    Making liquor; from Wilkes superior court — Judge Perryman. October 4, 1926.
    
      Norman & Norman, for plaintiff in error.
    
      M. L. Felts, solicitor-general, contra.
    Criminal Law, 16 C. J. p. 765, n. 60; p. 1180, n. 74.
   Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; the evidence, while wholly circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., conows. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.