Case ID: f-appx_450/html/0317-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jerome DIXON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Audrey HAZELWOOD; Chandra Johnson; John Hazelwood, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 11-1443.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 19, 2011.
    Decided: Oct. 19, 2011.
    Jerome Dixon, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Dixon appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dixon v. Hazelwood, No. 3:11-cv-00080-REP (E.D.Va. Feb. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.