Case ID: so2d_627/html/0524-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Malcolm Bernard WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-1373.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Oct. 11, 1993.
    Opinion on Grant of Clarification Nov. 19, 1993.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Kathleen Stover, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
    
      Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Bradley R. Bischoff, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, SMITH and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OR CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied. However, we grant the motion for clarification as to the basis for our “Per Curiam, affirmed” decision issued on October 11, 1993, by stating that we affirmed the issue regarding simultaneous selection of juries on authority of this court’s decision in Rock v. State, 622 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), decision on jurisdiction pending, no. 82,530, Florida Supreme Court.

BOOTH, SMITH and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.