Case ID: so2d_633/html/1067-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nathaniel H. THOMAS, Petitioner v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    Nos. 80624, 81657.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    March 24, 1994.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and M.A. Lucas, Asst. Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, for petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Nancy Ryan and Rebecca Roark Wall, Asst. Attys. Gen., Daytona Beach, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel H. Thomas seeks review of two decisions of the district court of appeal, State v. Thomas, 604 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), and State v. Thomas, 616 So.2d 637 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), on the ground of conflict. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We consolidate the two review proceedings for disposition in one opinion.

On the authority of our recent decision in State v. Bamber, 630 So.2d 1048 (Fla.1994), we quash both decisions under review and remand for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Bamber.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

McDONALD, J., dissents.