Case ID: minn_107/html/0572-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOHN McALPINE v. JOHN MILLEN.
    
    April 23, 1909.
    Nos. 15,832—(19½).
    
    Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Dibell, J., denying a new trial.
    Affirmed.
    
      Boss é Dwyer and J. N. Beoríes, for plaintiff.
    
      L. O. Horris and H. B. Fryberger, for respondent.
    
      
       Reported in 120 N. W. 1134.
    
    
      
       April, 1909, term calendar.
    
   PER CURIAM.

After the disposition of this case on the former appeal (104 Minn. 289, 116 N. W. 583) the plaintiff made a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The motion was denied, and under the established rule (Bunker v. United Order of Foresters, 97 Minn. 361, 107 N. W. 392, and cases therein cited) we cannot, ón this record, say that the court abused its discretion. Affirmed.