Case ID: f-appx_475/html/0927-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Matthew Spencer O’BRIEN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Mr. SUMMERFIELD, Defendant-Appellee, and Dr. Brooks; Bobby P. Shearin; J. Michael Stouffer; Scott S. Oakley, Defendants.
    No. 12-6812.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 16, 2012.
    Decided: Aug. 21, 2012.
    Matthew Spencer O’Brien, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Christopher Costello, Wharton, Levin, Ehrmantraut, Klein & Nash, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Matthew Spencer O’Brien appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. O’Brien v. Summerfield, No. 1:11-cv-02346-ELH (D. Md. Feb. 21, 2012); 2012 WL 1150797 (Apr. 5, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.