Case ID: f-appx_235/html/0073-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Veronica CARTIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IMAGE 75, a/k/a Life Style Lift Clinic; Suzanne Kim Doud Galli, M.D., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 07-1340.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 23, 2007.
    Decided: Aug. 28, 2007.
    Veronica Cartier, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Veronica Cartier appeals the district court’s order dismissing her claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) with prejudice for failure to state a claim, and dismissing her remaining claims without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(3). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cartier v. Image 75, No. 1:07-cv-00294-LMB (E.D.Va. Apr. 6, 2007). We further affirm the district court’s order denying Cartier’s Notice of Removal of Material filed for the reasons stated by the district court. Cartier v. Image 75, No. 1:07-cv-00294-LMB (E.D.Va. Apr. 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.