Case ID: f-appx_437/html/0574-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kurt WASHINGTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James A. YATES, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 09-16541.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted May 24, 2011.
    
    Filed June 9, 2011.
    
      Kurt Washington, Coalinga, CA, pro se.
    Krista Leigh Pollard, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
    Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

California state prisoner Kurt Washington appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition challenging the loss of work-time credits following a prison disciplinary proceeding. We dismiss.

Washington contends that the 30-day loss of work-time credits assessed following his prison disciplinary conviction violated his constitutional rights. After briefing was completed in this case, this court held that a certificate of appealability is required to challenge an administrative decision. See Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546, 554-55 (9th Cir.2010) (en banc). Because Washington has not has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, we decline to certify his claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

All pending motions are denied as moot.

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.