Case ID: ga_172/html/0904-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Gilbert, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Brown v. Wells.
    No. 8324.
    June 12, 1931.
    
      Reese, Scarlett, Bennet & Highsmith, for plaintiff in error.
    
      S. 0. Townsend, contra.
   Gilbert, J.

The suit was brought to recover forty acres of land and the timber growing thereon. On the trial it appeared that the real contention was over 18-3/4 acres out of the 40 described in the petition. The verdict was for the plaintiff, and the defendant excepted to the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial. , The only special grounds of the motion were expressly abandoned by the plaintiff in error. Weld, that the verdict is supported by evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.