Case ID: ohio-law-abs_1/html/0298-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": ".PER CURIAM:.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 259
    BRANGLE v. STATE
    Ohio Court of Appeals, Cuyahoga County
    No. 4415.
    Feb. 25, 1923
    ERROR — (1) Judgment of lower court affirmed.
    Error to Cuyahoga Court of Common Pleas
    Attorneys — H. P. Hartrath, for Brangle; E. C. Stanton, for State.
   .PER CURIAM:.

Epitomized Opinion

Brangle was convicted of burglary and larceny in common pleas court and seeks to have the judgment reversed on the ground of prejudicial error in that court. Held by: the Court of Appeals:

1. The court believing that there is abundant' evi-udence 'to support the verdict and not finding any - prejudicial-, error, the judgment is affirmed;