Case ID: so2d_723/html/0361-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George JANNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 97-02834.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Dec. 23, 1998.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Bruce P. Taylor, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
    Robert A Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Angela D. McCravy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

George Janney challenges the order of restitution entered after he pleaded guilty to a charge of dealing in stolen property. Some of the arguments Janney advances in this appeal were not presented to the trial court. “It is well settled that the specific legal ground upon which a claim is based must be raised at trial and a claim different than that raised below will not be heard on appeal.” See Rodriguez v. State, 609 So.2d 493, 499 (Fla.1992). Furthermore, the evidence presented at the restitution hearing was sufficient to support the trial court’s order. Therefore, we affirm.

BLUE, AC.J., and FULMER and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.