Case ID: ad3d_90/html/1480-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edward Cunningham, III, Appellant, v LeChase Construction et al., Respondents. Frederico Wrecking Co., Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v Contour Erection and Siding Systems, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. LeChase Construction Services, LLC, et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v Contour Erection and Siding Systems, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
    [934 NYS2d 731]
   It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying those parts of the motions of defendants-third-party plaintiffs and third-party defendant seeking summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim and the Labor Law § 241 (6) claim to the extent that it is premised on a violation of 12 NYCRR 23-3.3 (h), reinstating those claims and denying that part of the motion of third-party defendant seeking summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaints and reinstating the third-party complaints, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs (see Charney v LeChase Constr., 90 AD3d 1477 [2011]). Present — Scudder, EJ., Smith, Centra, Green and Gorski, JJ.