Case ID: f-appx_163/html/0805-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ray PLAIR, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-12913
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Jan. 6, 2006.
    David Jonathon Joffe, Joffe & Joffe, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, FL, for PlaintiffAppellee.
    Peter J. Sholl, United States Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before DUBINA, HULL and COX, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

David J. Joffe, appointed counsel for Ray Plair in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Plair’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.