Case ID: so2d_486/html/0680-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Donna Johns MUNSEY, Petitioner, v. GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, Paul D. Glassburn, W. Garrett Marks, Jr., L.W. “Bill” Chamberlain, James R. Price, M.E. “Marv” Meyer, and George H. Gage, Respondents.
    No. 86-295.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 11, 1986.
    Robert H. Grizzard, II, Lakeland, for petitioner.
    John McAdams and Marti Phillips of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, P.A., Tampa, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

Petitioner contends the trial judge’s orders departed from the essential requirements of law on two grounds: (1) in denying her request for discovery of a certain document, and (2) in holding that the document and any testimony concerning it will be inadmissible at trial.

We deny the petition; however, as to the second ground relating to admissibility of evidence at trial, our denial is without prejudice to petitioner raising the issue on appeal, if any, from a final judgment.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and LEHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.