Case ID: njl_1/html/0534-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Cur.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DENHAM v. CROWELL, ADMINISTRATOR OF HADDON.
    Under a plea of solvit ad diem by intestate, evidence of payment after the day by administrator is admissible.
    This was an action of debt on a bond, to which the defendant pleaded — 1st. That the intestate paid the moneys due on the day mentioned in the condition; and under this plea offered to prove a tender of continental money, made by himself as administrator, after the day.
    
      This evidence was objected to — 1st. Because payment by-administrator will not support the plea of solvit ad diem by intestate. 2d. Because payment after the day must be pleaded specially.
    
      Griffith and Stockton, for plaintiff.
    
      M’lllvaine and Woodruff, for defendant.
   Per Cur.

The first reason is amply sufficient. The evidence is totally inadmissible.