Case ID: f-appx_131/html/0957-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Walter Jacob DAVIS, a/k/a Marcus Swanson, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 05-6127.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted May 19, 2005.
    Decided May 25, 2005.
    Walter Jacob Davis, Appellant pro se. Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM.

Walter Jacob Davis appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider prior orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. - See United States v. Davis, No. CA-94-73-5-1-F (E.D.N.C. filed Oct. 20, 2004 & entered Oct. 21, 2004; filed Nov. 24, 2004 & entered Dec. 9, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED