Case ID: f-appx_671/html/0824-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES SUGAR CORPORATION, Petitioner v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent American Chemistry Council, et al., Intervenors American Chemistry Council, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent American Forest & Paper Association, et al., Intervenors
    No. 11-1108
    Consolidated with 11-1124, 11-1134, 11-1142, 11-1145, 11-1159, 11-1165, 11-1172, 11-1174, 11-1181, 13-1086, 13-1087, 13-1091, 13-1092, 13-1096, 13-1097, 13-1098, 13-1099, 13-1100, 13-1103
    No. 11-1141
    Consolidated with 11-1182, 11-1207, 11-1208, 13-1105, 13-1107
    September Term, 2016
    United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
    Filed On: December 23, 2016
    EPA-76FR15608, EPA-78FR7138, EPA-76FR15554, EPA-78FR7488
    Timothy S. Bishop,. Chad Matthew damage, Mayer Brown LLP, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner (Case No. 11-1108).
    Norman Louis Rave, Jr., Perry M. Ro-sen, John Charles Cruden, Assistant Attorney General, Sam Hirsch, U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Environment and Natural Resources Division, Madeline Paradise Fleisher, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, DC, for Respondent (Case No. 11-1108).
    David M. Friedland, Beveridge & Diamond, P.C., Claudia M. O’Brien, Stacey Lynn VanBelleghem, Latham & Watkins LLP, William L, Wehrum, Jr., Charles Howland Knauss, Esquire, Lauren Elizabeth Freeman, Makram B. Jaber, Hunton & Williams LLP, Jeffrey A. Knight, Peter H. Wyckoff, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Harry Moy Ng, John P. Wagner, Senior Attorney, American Petroleum Institute, Lisa Marie Jaeger, Bracewell LLP, James Samuel Pew, Neil Gormley, Attorney, Earthjustice, Quentin Riegel, Deputy General Counsel, National Association of Manufacturers, Washington, DC, William F. Lane, Esquire, Alan Holmes McConnell, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Raleigh, NC, Allen A. Kacenjar, Jr., Esquire, Douglas A. McWilliams, Esquire, Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Cleveland, OH, Shannon S. Broome, Esquire, Attorney, Hunton <& Williams LLP, Hunton & Williams LLP, San Francisco, CA, Ronald A. Shipley Law Office of Ronald A. Shipley, Damascus, MD, Larry Benton Alexander, Esquire, Jones, Foster, Johnston, & Stubbs, P.A., West Plam Beach, FL, Carol F. McCabe, Esquire, Michael Dillon, Attorney, Suzanne llene Schiller, Esquire, Manko, Gold, Katcher & Fox, LLP, Bala Cynwyd, PA, for Interve-nors for Respondent (Case No. 11-1108).
    David M. Friedland, Beveridge & Diamond, P.C., Leslie A. Hulse, American Chemistry Council, Washington, DC, for Petitioner (Case No. 11-1141).
    Madeline Paradise Fleisher, Hogan Lo-vells US LLP, Norman Louis Rave, Jr., Perry M. Rosen, U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Environment and Natural Resources Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent (Case No. 11-1141).
    
      William L. Wehrum, Jr., Hunton & Williams LLP, Neil Gormley, Attorney, James Samuel Pew, Earthjustice, Pamela A. Lacey, American Gas Association, William Pedersen, Nidhi J. Thakar, Esquire, Perkins Coie LLP, Jeffrey A. Knight, Peter H. Wyckoff,- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Harry Moy Ng, John P, Wagner, Senior Attorney, American Petroleum Institute, Robin S. Conrad, Esquire, Partner, Dentons US LLP, Quentin Rie-gel, Deputy General Counsel, National Association of Manufacturers, Lisa Marie Jaeger, Bracewell LLP, James Watson Conrad, Jr., Conrad Law & Policy Counsel, Washington, DC, William F. Lane, Esquire, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Raleigh, NC, for Intervenors for Respondent, Movant-Intervenor (Case No. 11-1141).
    BEFORE: Henderson, Brown, and Griffith, Circuit. Judges
   ORDER

Per Curiam

Upon consideration of the petitions for panel rehearing filed on September 12, 2016 by Louisiana Environmental Action Network, Sierra Club, Clean Air Council, Partnership for Policy Integrity, and Environmental Integrity Project in Nos. 11-1108, et al. and 11-1141, et ah; by American Municipal Power, Inc. in No. 11-1108, et al.; and by EPA in No. 11-1108, et al. as to remedy, and the responses to EPA’s petition, it is

ORDERED that the petition filed by EPA be granted to the extent that the numeric MACT standards set in the Major Boilers Rule for new and existing sources in each of the eighteen subcategories be remanded without vacatur for the agency to conduct further proceedings consistent with the court’s prior opinion, in accordance with the opinion issued herein this date. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the remaining petitions be denied.

The Clerk is directed to enter a new judgment. The Clerk is further directed to issue the mandate'forthwith.