Case ID: f-appx_297/html/0223-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nadine BATCHELOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Northrop GRUMMAN, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 08-1491.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 21, 2008.
    Decided: Oct. 23, 2008.
    Nadine Batchelor, Appellant Pro Se. James Joseph Kelley, II, Charys F. Scot-ton, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
    Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Nadine Batchelor appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for reconsideration of the court’s memorandum and order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Batchelor v. Northrop, No. 1:07-cv-01032-WMN (D.Md. Apr. 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.