Case ID: sw3d_127/html/0715-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William C. KEEGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 62620.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    March 2, 2004.
    Susan L. Hogan, Kansas City, for appellant.
    Andrea K. Spillars, Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before HARDWICK, P.J., SPINDEN and NEWTON, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Keegan appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, alleging ineffective assistance of his trial counsel. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment. The parties have been provided with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)