Case ID: nys_134/html/1131-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DUNN, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    March 13, 1912.)
    Action by Elizabeth F. Dunn, as administratrix, etc., against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. See, also, 133 N. Y. Supp. 1119.

KRUSE, J., dissents, upon the ground that in view of the defendant’s rules and orders and the signals given, and the unfamiliarity of the deceased with the road and conditions at the place of the accident, the question of contributory negligence, as well as that of the defendant’s negligence, was for the jury.