Case ID: idaho_39/html/0327-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      BUDGE, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(June 30, 1924.)
    STATE, Respondent, v. C. O. STARCHER, Appellant.
    [227 Pac. 386.]
    No Appearance — Appeal and Error — Rule 48 — Judgment Affirmed.
    1. Under the provisions of Rule 48 of this court where a cause on the calendar is reached for hearing and neither side has submitted a brief or is represented by counsel, in its discretion this court may dismiss the appeal, which results in an affirmance of the judgment below, or examine the record for fundamental error and render its judgment on the merits.
    2. Record examined and held sufficient to support the judgment.
    APPEAL from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, for Ada County. Hon. Charles F. Reddoch, Judge.
    Appeal from judgment of conviction for unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    Charles H. Edwards, for Appellant.
    A. H. Conner, Attorney General, James L. Boone, Assistant Attorney General, and Elbert S. Delana, for Respondent.
    Counsel file no briefs.
   BUDGE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the crime of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor. A motion for a new trial was overruled. From the judgment of conviction and from the order overruling the motion for a new trial this appeal is prosecuted.

The transcript on appeal was filed in this court on March 21, 1923, but no 'brief has been filed, by appellant. When the cause was reached upon the calendar and set down for hearing appellant was neither present dor represented by counsel. Under such circumstances and in accordance with Rule 48 this court may, in its discretion, either dismiss the appeal, which results in an affirmance of the judgment below or examine the record for fundamental error and render its decision on the merits. We have therefore examined the record but find no fundamental error. The judgment must be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

McCarthy, C. J., and William A. Lee and Wm. E. Lee, 'JJ., concur.