Case ID: ga-app_28/html/0364-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Luke, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

12834.
    Cater, adm’r, v. Ayers et al.
    
    Decided March 9, 1922.
    Complaint; from Carroll superior court — Judge Boop. June 30, 1921.
    
      S. Holderness, for plaintiff in error. Boykin & Boykin, contra.
   Luke, J.

This suit was for certain money and the value of a bank certificate of deposit which the plaintiff alleged the defendants converted to their own use. Under the evidence introduced by the plaintiff the court did not err in granting a nonsuit as to Mrs. Ayers, one of the defendants. Under all of the evidence adduced upon the trial, the verdict against the remaining defendant for $80 principal and $14.76 interest was authorized.

The alleged newly discovered evidence is impeaching and cumulative, and would not likely produce a different result upon another trial.

No ground of the motion for a new trial approved by the trial judge shows reversible error.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.