Case ID: f-appx_193/html/0260-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Maryann BULLARD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 06-1311.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 28, 2006.
    Decided: Aug. 8, 2006.
    MaryAnn Bullard, Appellant Pro Se. Linda Sue Laibstain, Williams, Mullen, Hofheimer & Nusbaum, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia; David Richard Kresser, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

MaryAnn Bullard appeals the district court’s dismissal of her complaint alleging employment discrimination, retaliatory discharge, sexual harassment and disparate treatment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bullard v. Panasonic Corp. of North Am., 418 F.Supp.2d 802 (E.D.Va.2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.