Case ID: njl_65/html/0686-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam;.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WILLIAM M. LANNING, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. CHARLES H. BAKER, RECEIVER OF TAXES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
    Submitted December 11, 1900
    Decided March 4, 1901.
    On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Supreme Court, see ante p. 133.
    
      William M. Lanning, pro se.
    
    For the defendant in error, John Rellstab.
    
   Per Curiam;.

The judgment of the court below in this case is affirmed, upon the grounds stated in the memorandum -filed in that court, and the opinion of Chancellor Magie, filed at this term in Mechanics National Bank of Trenton v. Charles H. Baker, Receiver, ante p. 549.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Garrison, Port, Garretson, Bogert, Krueger, Hendrickson, Adame, Vredenburgi-i, Voorhees. 11.

For reversal—None.