Case ID: so2d_627/html/0641-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WATSON, J., HALL, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re STATE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE XYZ.
    No. 93-O-2790.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Nov. 10, 1993.
   In re District Court Judge XYZ; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs.

Denied.

WATSON, J.,

concurs in the denial but notes his opinion that this is a very close matter and that the Judiciary Commission should exercise care because of its vast power.

HALL, J.,

concurs. The motion to quash subpoena duces tecum should first be filed in the Judiciary Commission. However, the showing made does not warrant quashing the subpoena. Thus, I concur in the denial of the motion to quash, but I would grant the motion to keep the filing confidential in this matter pending before the Commission.

ORTIQUE, J., joins in the concurrence by HALL, J.

DENNIS, J., not on panel.