Case ID: ga_163/html/0760-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

East v. Henry Darling Incorporated.
    No. 5235.
    February 18, 1927.
    Petition for injunction. Before Judge Maddox. Eloyd superior court. December 8, 1925.
    
      M. B. Súbanles, for plaintiff.
    
      Willingham, Wright & Covington, for defendant.
    Injunctions, 32 C. J. p. 57, n. 34; p. 61, n. 55; p. 65, n. 89.
   Per Curiam.

The court did not err in refusing a temporary injunction, because the petitioner had an adequate remedy at law as provided in Civil Code (1910), § 3289.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.