Case ID: njl_92/html/0248-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOHN B. BURTIS, RESPONDENT, v. EDWARD O. HAINES, APPELLANT.
    Submitted March 25, 1918
    Decided May 3, 1918.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 91 A. J. L. 4.
    For the respondent, J. Mercer Davis.
    
    For the appellant, V. Claude Palmer.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard. Bergen, Minturn, Black, Wi-iite, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.