Case ID: so2d_798/html/0828-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Glenroy SALMON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D01-2143.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 31, 2001.
    
      Glenroy Salmon, in proper person.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and SORONDO, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
   ON MOTION FOR REHEARING, AND OR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

We grant the motion for rehearing. As in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), we certify that we have passed on the following question of great public importance:

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAS A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?