Case ID: sarat-ch-sent_5/html/0011-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David Balde v. Henry Smith et al.
    
    Matteson & Doolittle, for complainants; S. Cheever, for defendants.
    without ⅛⅞⅞»™" ° Jud°maU'
    Em,ct0f0ff(ir|n(r ‘°t'yu™ Sjirp‘
   Decided that an accord without satisfaction — as for example, an agreement to receive property in part payment of a judgment, and an endorsed note for the balance — is not a discharge of the judgment, so as to prevent the filing of a creditor’s bill and the appointment of a receiver.

Decided also, that an offer by a defendant in a judgment to turn out to the sheriff sufficient property to satisfy the execution, is no defence to the appointment of a receiver upon a creditor’s bill; as the defendant has his remedy against the sheriff, if he makes a ialse return.

Usual order of reference to a master in the county of Sara-toga to appoint a receiver.