Case ID: so3d_134/html/1133-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cynthia RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. ARAMARK/SEDGEWICK CMS, Appellees.
    No. 1D13-4138.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Feb. 18, 2014.
    Rehearing Denied April 11, 2014.
    Charles H. Leo of Charles H. Leo, P.A., Orlando, and Richard W. Ervin, III, of Fox & Loquasto, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    James H. Wyman of Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP, Coral Gables, for Appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

Based ' on Castellanos v. Next Door Company, 124 So.3d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), we AFFIRM. In so doing, we certify that our disposition of the instant case passes upon the same question we certified in Castellanos. Id. at 394. We, therefore, decline to follow the Appellant’s suggestion that we certify additional questions of great public importance relating to the instant case.

ROWE, MARSTILLER, and RAY, JJ., concur.