Case ID: so2d_814/html/1212-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Adrian McDONALD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D02-514.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    April 24, 2002.
    
      Adrian McDonald, Arcadia, pro se.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Donna M. Hoffmann, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Adrian McDonald alleges that he did not have the predicate convictions to declare him a habitual offender. The trial court denied the motion as not cognizable under Rule 3.800(a). We reverse and remand for the trial court to consider whether it is apparent from the face of the record that McDonald did not have the requisite predicate felonies as a matter of law. Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246 (Fla.2001); Alloway v. State, 807 So.2d 187 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

KLEIN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.