Case ID: ad_216/html/0849-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ida E. Thomas, Respondent, v. F. Roebling Geyser, Appellant.
   Order denying motion for judgment dismissing complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Whether the Statute of Limitations is applicable is a question of fact to be determined upon a trial of the action. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur. 
      
      See Civ. Prac. Act, § 50, subd. 1 (malpractice); Rules Civ. Prac. rule 107, subd. 6.— [Rep.