Case ID: f2d_174/html/0158-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WONG YANG SUNG, appellant, v. Tom CLARK, Attorney General of the United States, Watson B. [Miller, United States Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization, appellees.
    No. 10009.
    United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
    Argued Feb. 8, 1949.
    Decided April 4, 1949.
    Mr. Leo J. Michaloski, of Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Thomas A. Farrell, of Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.
    Mr. L. Clark Ewing, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. George Morris Fay, U. S. Atty., and Oliver O. Dibble and John D. Lane, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellees.
    Messrs. L. Paul Winings, Gen. Counsel, and Robert L. Jefferys, Atty., Immigration and Naturalization Service, both of Washington, D. C., were also on the brief for appellees.
    Before EDGERTON, PRETTYMAN .and PROCTOR, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the District Court is .affirmed on the opinion of Judge Holtzoff. Wong Yang Sung v. Clark, 80 F.Supp. .235. It is immaterial that appellant entered the United States legally. Azzollini et al. v. Watkins, 2 Cir., 172 F.2d 897.