Case ID: f-appx_700/html/0267-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN RE: Francisco SALINAS-CASTILLO, Petitioner.
    No. 17-1604
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: October 24, 2017
    Decided: November 2, 2017
    Francisco Salinas-Castillo, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Francisco Salinas-Castillo petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion to compel. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We have determined that the district court denied Salinas-Castillo’s motion on April 12, 2017. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED