Case ID: f-supp_977/html/1140-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SAFFELS, District Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Donna M. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.
    Civil Action No. 95-4190-DES.
    United States District Court, D. Kansas.
    Nov. 13, 1997.
   ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC

SAFFELS, District Judge.

On April 30, 1997, this court entered a Memorandum and Order in the above-captioned case, reported at 961 F.Supp. 1496. Page 1498, paragraph four, lines one through four should read: “The trial court conducted a motions hearing on August 25, 1993, at which all parties, including Prudential, were represented. The court issued an order resolving.... ”

Page 1500, paragraph one, lines five through six should read: “Indeed, the court seriously doubts there is such a distinction. Waiting to file a known claim.... ”

IT IS SO ORDERED.