Case ID: ohio-law-abs_16/html/0318-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "By THE COURT", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WALTON v WILKINS
    Ohio Appeals, 2nd Dist, Franklin Co
    No 2233.
    Decided April 21, 1933
    N. L. Greenlee, Columbus, for plaintiff in error.
    W. E. Bigony, Columbus, for defendant in error.
   OPINION

By THE COURT

Submitted, on application of defendant in error for rehearing.

We have examined the case to which our attention has been directed, namely, Justina Gardner v Hengenold, 6 O.D. (Reprint), 997. We do not And that the la\v of this case, so far as it was required to be enunciated by the facts, is in conflict with our decision. We do not believe that the doctrine of merger has such application to the facts in this case as to prevent Walton from asserting his defense against Wilkins.

The application for rehearing will therefore be overruled.

HORNBECK, PJ, KUNKLE and BARNES, JJ.