Case ID: so2d_474/html/1295-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BLANCHE, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FAUSTINA PIPE LINE COMPANY v. John Austin HEBERT, Annabelle Hebert Sonnier, et al. FAUSTINA PIPE LINE COMPANY v. Percy HEBERT, et al.
    No. 85-C-1215.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 20, 1985.
   In re Faustina Pipe Line Co.; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Number 84-459; Parish of Lafayette 15th Judicial District Court Div. “H” Number 83-0760.

Prior report: 469 So.2d 483.

Denied.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.

BLANCHE, J.,

would grant the writ on the issue of severance damages. The mere existence of a pipeline absent any eviden-tiary support of damage will not support an award for severance damages. Furthermore, encasement costs of a pipeline under unplanned streets in an imaginary subdivision is speculative.