Case ID: f-appx_547/html/0246-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dwight A. RUDISILL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M. Travis BRAGG, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 13-7576.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.
    Decided: Nov. 26, 2013.
    Dwight Alexander Rudisill, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Dwight Alexander Rudisill, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2013) petition and motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rudisill v. Bragg, No. 4:13-cv-01327-CMC, 2013 WL 5309152 (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.