Case ID: so2d_533/html/0934-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Otis BROWN, Jr., a/k/a Otis Lamar Brown, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 87-2540.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 22, 1988.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Julie S. Thornton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The defendant contends, the State concedes, and we agree, that findings set forth in Paragraphs 2 and 5 of the Order of Revocation of Probation must be stricken from the Order because the trial court made no such findings at the conclusion of the revocation hearing, and no evidence was adduced to support such findings. See Higgs v. State, 470 So.2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Robinson v. State, 468 So.2d 1106 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Delgado v. State, 423 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Remanded with directions to amend the Order of Revocation of Probation by striking Paragraphs 2 and 5 of the findings.