Case ID: sw3d_125/html/0353-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sam HOYT, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF ARNOLD, The Personnel Board of Review of the City of Arnold, Brenda Zimmermann, Glennon Portell, and Connie Doty, Defendants/Respondents.
    No. ED 82633.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Jan. 13, 2004.
    
      Timothy K Kellett, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Michael D. Hart, St. Louis, MO, for respondents.
    Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Sam Hoyt, appeals from a judgment affirming the decision of the Personnel Board of Review of the City of Arnold sustaining his termination.

The decision of the Personnel Board is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).