Case ID: conn_248/html/0668-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOEL TUCKER
    (SC 16032)
    Borden, Berdon, Norcott, Katz and McDonald, Js.
    Argued April 22
    officially released May 18, 1999
    
      James A. Shanley, Jr., special public defender, for the appellant (defendant).
    
      Stephen J. Sedensky III, senior assistant state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, was Jonathan C. Benedict, state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).
   Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.

The appeal is dismissed. 
      
       We granted the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court; State v. Tucker, 50 Conn. App. 506, 719 A.2d 1170 (1998); limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court, properly conclude that General Statutes (Rev. to 1995) § 53-21 was not unconstitutionally vague as applied to the defendant’s conduct?” State v. Tucker, 247 Conn. 928, 719 A.2d 1170 (1998).