Case ID: so2d_354/html/1361-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. DENNIS, J., TATE, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Louisiana v. Harold BROOMFIELD.
    No. 60823.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Feb. 10, 1978.
    William J. O’Hara, III, Supervising Atty., New Orleans, Edwin G. Foulke, Jr., Student Practitioner, Loyola Law School Clinic, for defendant-appellant.
    William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Philip J. Boudousque, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DENNIS, J.,

concurs for the reasons assigned in the separate opinions in State v. Terrebonne, No. 60,731, La., 354 So.2d 1356.

TATE, J.,

concurs. The substantial issue of constitutionality does not appear to be squarely raised by trial court motion or objection or by assignment of error.