Case ID: njl_97/html/0324-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ANNIE FISHER, RESPONDENT, v. TIDE WATER BUILDING COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Submitted December 5, 1921
    Decided February 9, 1922.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 96 N. J. L. 103.
    For the respondent, D. Trueman Stackhouse.
    
    For the appellant, Hotoard L. Miller.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Black in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Tbenciiard, Bergen, Mínturn, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Williams, Acicerson, Van Busicirk, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Gardner, J. 1.