Case ID: nj-eq_104/html/0496-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gaetano Di Tullio, respondent, v. Carmella Di Tullio, appellant.
    [Decided May 20th, 1929.]
    
      Mr. Henry O. Burt, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. Louis H. Miller, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, and reported in 102 N. J. Eq. 141.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, White, Van Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 15.

For reversal— None.