Case ID: so2d_386/html/0063-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Francisco DOMINGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 80-635.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 29, 1980.
    
      Mitchell Denker, Key West, Franklin, En-tin, Kimler & Marks, North Miami Beach, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Susan Minor, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Francisco Dominguez, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and this Court having considered the record presented and the briefs on appeal, we determine (1) that it conclusively appears that petitioner is entitled to no relief; (2) that the issue raised on the petitioner’s Rule 3.850 motion was decided adversely to him on direct appeal, Dominguez v. State, 374 So.2d 1016 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), and may not be reconsidered. Thomas v. State, 383 So.2d 261 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Affirmed.