Case ID: f-appx_472/html/0265-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Mario E. RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a “O”, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 12-6361.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 26, 2012.
    Decided: May 1, 2012.
    Mario E. Rodriguez, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
    
      Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Mario E. Rodriguez appeals the district court’s order denying his motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 8582(c)(2) (2006) seeking a reduction of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rodriguez, No. 5:08-cr-00031-FPS-1 (N.D.W. Va. filed Jan. 17, 2012 & entered Jan. 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.