Case ID: a2d_991/html/0305-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HIGBY DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Petitioner v. John SARTOR, J. Russell Yerkes, Yerkes Associates, Inc., Lee Ledbetter, Norman Vutz, Daniel Keogh, Uday Patankar and Marietta M. Marquart, Respondents.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    March 23, 2010.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2010, it appearing that the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County erred in granting Respondents’ preliminary objections as to Petitioner’s intentional tort claims on the basis that Petitioner had failed adequately to allege willful misconduct, and it further appearing that the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming that determination, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Commonwealth Court dated July 14, 2008 is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County to reinstate Petitioner’s intentional tort claims.