Case ID: njl_118/html/0301-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MARTIN TUCKER, RESPONDENT, v. FRANK J. BELTRAMO, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT.
    Argued October 27, 1936
    Decided May 19, 1937.
    For the respondent, Isadore Rabinowitz.
    
    For the appellant, Merritt Lane.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.