Case ID: pa_329/html/0148-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richardson, Appellant, v. Frick Company, Inc.
    Argued January 12, 1938.
    Before Kephart, C. J., Schaefer, Maxey, Drew, Linn and Stern, JJ.
    
      
      Abraham, Wernielc, for appellant.
    
      Wármele Potter Scott, Knot» Henderson and Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, for appellee, were not heard.
    January 31, 1938:
   Per Curiam,

We are all agreed that the action of the court below in entering judgment n. o. v. was correct. Appellant’s evidence failed to establish a commission contract with appellee. A review of the record shows that all the testimony of appellant is utterly inconsistent with the existence of the alleged contract. As the parties alone are interested in the facts, it is unnecessary to detail the evidence and their contentions.

Judgment affirmed.