Case ID: sw2d_749/html/0714-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. David WALLIS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 53310.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    May 10, 1988.
    Robert C. Wolfrum, Asst. Public Defender, St. Charles, for defendant-appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert V. Franson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

A jury found defendant guilty of stealing (•§ 570.030, RSMo) and declared punishment at “no imprisonment but a fine, in an amount to be determined by the Court”. The trial court imposed a fine of $2,500.00 for the offense and further ordered defendant to pay $36.00 to the Crime Victims’ Compensation Fund. Defendant appeals asserting his motion for judgment of acquittal should have been sustained because the evidence addressed was legally insufficient to support a conviction for stealing.

We have reviewed the entire record and find there is ample evidence to support defendant’s conviction. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).