Case ID: so2d_498/html/0576-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marianela CACERES, Appellant, v. Jose MILTON, Appellee.
    No. 86-1183.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 2, 1986.
    Rossano, Torrent & Leyte-Vidal and Henry Leyte-Vidal, Miami, for appellant.
    Marlow, Shofi, Connell, DeMahy, Valeri-us, Abrams, Lowe & Adler and Claudia Greenberg, Miami, for appellee.
    Before HUBBART, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Finding that the issue presented in this case is subject to the controlling authority of Russell v. A & L Development, Inc., 273 So.2d 439, 440 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 279 So.2d 308 (Fla.1973), which holds that a party may not “attempt to receive a second satisfaction for the same wrong against a different party,” we affirm the Final Summary Judgment. See Weber v. Tam-Bay Realty, Inc., 490 So.2d 1371 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

Affirmed.