Case ID: misc_15/html/0684-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George A. Nerjes, Respondent, v. Addie V. Roe, Appellant.
    Appeal from judgment of the Eighth Judicial District Court.
    
      David Levy, for appellant.
    
      P. C. Talman, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

It is obvious from an examination of the lease, under which the plaintiff claims, that the tenant’s dapiages were to be measured by the number of days during which his occupancy was .deferred, and the amount deducted, at an agreed rate, from the accruing ■ rent. Here there was no occupancy whatsoever and the tenant could look to the advance payment of the three months’ rent only at'the end of that period. • '

The assignment of his “ claim ” against the lessor by the tenant to this plaintiff , at the beginning, of the second nionth was valueless as a transfer of a right of action, for there was no existing claim at that time. At the end of the three months the tenant would have had a cause of action for the advance rent paid, but the lease was annulled by the parties some few days after the assignment of the purported claim, the tenant then receiving back his full advance payment as made;

Had the plaintiff delayed bringing his action until the .expiration of the three months, which he did not, he still would have had no'cause for action, since'the contract was no-longer in existence at that time.

- Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed.

Present: Bookstaver and Bischofe, JJ.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed.