Case ID: misc_33/html/0771-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The United Electric Light & Power Company, Respondent, v. The Grand Central Real Estate & Investment Company, Appellant.
    Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, rendered in • the Municipal Court of the city of Eew York, second district, borough of Manhattan.
    Eorster & Speir, for appellant.
    G. W. Simpson, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

In this case, although the contract was made in the names of Tiernan & S'omers, it was so made at the request of and for the benefit of the defendant, in order to enable it to get the increased discount. Credit was not given to Tiernan & Somers, but was given to the defendant. The earlier bills appear to have been paid by the defendant. This is not a case of one giving credit to a disclosed principal.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugbo, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.