Case ID: ga-app_43/html/0423-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

21455.
    Durden et al. v. Moore et al.
    
    Decided June 9, 1931.
    
      J. Alex. Smith, Newton Gaskins, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      I. W. Bountree, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

The exception here is to the first grant of a new trial. The verdict was not demanded by the law and the facts of the case; and therefore, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, the judgment must be

Affirmed. Lulce, J., concurs.

Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.