Case ID: fla_126/html/0304-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

E. H. Armstrong v. Duron W. Browning and Reliance Life Insurance Company of Pittsburgh.
    170 So. 839.
    Division B.
    Opinion Filed November 23, 1936.
    
      ' Leon'J. C. Hartón, for Appellant;
    
      ■Paul W. Harvey, for Appellees.
   Per Curiam.

In this case the appeal is from final decree adjudicating in effect that án assignment Of a life- insurance policy absolute on its face was in fact an assignment to secure repayment of money advanced by the assignee to pay premiums on the policy, and therefore, constituted a lien-on the proceeds of the policy payable at the death of 'the insured.

, The allegations of the Bill of Complaint were sufficient to.state the cause of action and, if proved, to' warrant the relief sought. .

Thre was ample legal evidence to support the .allegations of the Bill of Complaint and to constitute sound basis for the decree.

We find no reversible error and the decree appealed from is therefore affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.