Case ID: f-appx_111/html/0675-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William Hencely DAVIS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David POWELL, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 04-6889.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 14, 2004.
    Decided: Oct. 20, 2004.
    
      William Hencely Davis, Jr., Appellant pro se.
    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

William Hencely Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Davis v. Powell, No. CA-03-1190-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2004). We deny as moot Davis’ motion and amended motion to consolidate this appeal with Appeal Nos. 04-6890 and 04-6951. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED