Case ID: f2d_386/html/0997-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Elmer DAVIS, aka Robert Brown, Appellant, v. Leroy R. EIDE et al., Appellees.
    No. 21726.
    United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
    Dec. 21, 1967.
    Elmer Davis, in pro. per.
    Roger Arnebergh, City Atty., John A. Daly, Asst. City Atty., Thomas M. Rosenberg, Deputy City Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.
    Before BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and McNICHOLS, District Judge.
    
      
       Hon. Ray McNiehols, United States District Judge, Boise, Idaho, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM:

The judgment is reversed, and the matter is remanded to the district court. It appears obvious to us that the complaint states a cause of action. From the order entered below (C.T. 38-39), we cannot ascertain which of the two grounds set forth in appellees’ motion, was relied upon by the district court in dismissing the action.