Case ID: njl_86/html/0704-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. JAMES J. KELLY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted July 3, 1914
    Decided September 25, 1914.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 84 N. J. L. 1.
    For the defendant in error, Robert 8- Hudspeth.
    
    For the plaintiff in error, Marshall Van Winkle and John J. Fallon.
    
   Per Curiam.

, The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchaed, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Bogert, Vredenburgh, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Bone.