Case ID: so3d_112/html/0143-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Orlance Jonathan SANGSTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D12-3098.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    May 9, 2013.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and M.J. Lord, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See F.B. v. State, 852 So.2d 226, 230 (Fla.2003) (holding that, with two exceptions, a defendant must preserve a claim of insufficiency of the evidence through a timely challenge in the trial court); see also State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412, 423 (Fla.2012) (holding that the Legislature’s decision to make the absence of knowledge of the illicit nature of a controlled substance an affirmative defense rather than an element of Florida’s drug offenses was constitutional).

WOLF, PADOVANO, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.