Case ID: f-appx_178/html/0301-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles Franklin HARGETT, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Mr. JACKSON; Ron Bell; Ms. Dial; Paula Smith; Rosemary Jackson; Phillip E. Stover, Defendants—Appellees, Theodis Beck; Boyd Bennett; Brenda Harden; Shirley Green; Judy Fogg; Ms. Boyette; Ms. Carter; George Kenworthy; Mr. Harrison, Defendants.
    No. 05-7862.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 27, 2006.
    Decided: May 4, 2006.
    Charles Franklin Hargett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina; Norwood Pitt Blanchard, III, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P., Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Charles Franklin Hargett, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hargett v. Jackson, No. CA-04-392-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED