Case ID: nj-eq_122/html/0020-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harry Tiedeck, complainant-respondent, v. Hamilton G. Pedrick, defendant-appellant.
    [Decided April 30th, 1937.]
    
      
      Mr. Waller 8. Keown and Mr. George D. Bothermel, for the complainant-respondent.
    
      Mr. James Mercer Davis, for the defendant-appellant.
   Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Dayis.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teefchaed, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Pebskie, Hetfield, Deak, Wells, WolfsKeil, Raffeety, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Pakkek, Case, Hehee, Cole, JJ. 4.