Case ID: so2d_657/html/0971-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Felix NEMBHARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 95-119.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 26, 1995.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Donald Tunnage, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Cynthia A. Greenfield, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, GERSTEN and GREEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied appellant’s motions for mistrial where the impermissible testimony was harmless in light of the other overwhelming evidence of guilt. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.