Case ID: nj-eq_74/html/0851-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph J. Hartman, complainant and respondent, v. Anna M. Hartman, defendant and appellant.
    [Argued June 18th, 1908.
    Decided November 16th, 1908.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevens, whose opinion is reported in 71 All. Rep. 417.
    
    
      Mr. Ohau-ncy IL. Beasley and Mr. Samuel J. McDonald, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Charles F. Herr, Mr. James M. Trimble and Mr. Samuel Iialisch, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

This case involves only questions of fact. We agree with the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor. The decree under review should therefore be affirmed.

The application for counsel fee is denied.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reep, Trencharp, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees,-Minturn, Bogert, Vrepenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill —16.

For reversal — None.