Case ID: ad2d_215/html/0701-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlos Torres, Appellant.
    [628 NYS2d 301]
   Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), rendered December 11, 1992, convicting him of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s specific contention that his absence from a sidebar discussion with a prospective juror during voir dire violated his fundamental right to be present at a material stage of trial thereby mandating a reversal of his conviction pursuant to the Court of Appeals decision in People v Sloan (79 NY2d 386). The sidebar discussion merely involved an inquiry into the juror’s ability to serve impartially in light of her daughter’s employment as a secretary with the Legal Aid Society, the office which also employed the defendant’s trial counsel. As such, the discussion did not fall within the parameters of People v Sloan (supra).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People u Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.