Case ID: f-appx_83/html/0920-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pepe RODRIGUEZ-LOSA, aka Pepe Loza-Rodriguez, Celso Rodriguez-Delgado, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-30421.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted Dec. 8, 2003.
    
    Decided Dec. 15, 2003.
    Kim R. Lindquist, Esq., United States Attorney’s Office, Boise, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Leo N. Griffard, Jr., Esq.,Boise, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before GOODWIN, WALLACE and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Pepe Rodriguez-Losa appeals his 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being a removed alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Rodriguez-Losa’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. There has been an answering brief, but no pro se supplemental brief, filed.

Our examination of the briefs and independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.