Case ID: sw2d_817/html/0255-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles E. DODD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant-Respondent.
    No. 59555.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Aug. 13, 1991.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 23, 1991.
    Application to Transfer Denied Nov. 19, 1991.
    James C. Ochs, Schwarz & Ochs, St. Louis, for plaintiff-appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Joan F. Edwards, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for defendant-respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals denial of his Rule 24.-035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Appellant’s claims of error fail because the record conclusively refutes them, and the sentences assessed are within the statutory range. Appellant is not entitled to relief. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are supported by the record, hence, not clearly erroneous. Judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).