Case ID: nys_102/html/1139-13.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

KNICKERBOCKER TRUST CO. v. ONEONTA, C. & R. S. RY. CO. et al.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.
    January 9, 1907.)
    Action by the Knickerbocker Trust Company, as trustee, against the Oneonta, Cooperstown & Richfield Springs Railway Company.
   No opinion. Motion for leave to go to the Court of Appeals granted. and questions certified as follows: First. May a defendant without the service of an answer by himself require a determination of the ultimate rights of himself and a codefendant as between themselves on an answer demanding such determination served on him by such codefendant? Second. Did the Special Term, under the pleadings and proof herein, properly render a judgment determining as between the defendants the ownership of the bonds?