Case ID: ohio-st-3d_77/html/1202-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. King.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. King (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 1202.]
    (No. 95-378
    Submitted and decided October 7, 1996.)
   This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent James C. King, a.k.a. James Coulter King, Attorney Registration No. 0000774, last known address in Lima, Ohio.

The court coming now to consider its order of February 28, 1996, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that James C. King, a.k.a. James Coulter King, be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. King (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 612, 660 N.E.2d 1160.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.