Case ID: so2d_445/html/0627-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alfred W. RICCO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 82-2571.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Feb. 8, 1984..
    Rehearing Denied March 14, 1984.
    Dorothy M. Walker of Walker & Vetrick, Belle Glade, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Lydia M. Valenti, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s conviction and sentence for manslaughter are affirmed on the authority of Dolan v. State, 85 So.2d 139 (Fla.1956). In reaching this decision, we have also concluded that the state’s use of the defendant’s grand jury testimony did not constitute fundamental error. Consequently, the various errors assigned to this point cannot be asserted on appeal due to the defendant’s failure to object properly at trial. See Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla.1978).

ANSTEAD, C.J., and HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.