Case ID: f-appx_89/html/0385-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mark A. WARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Peter E. MALONEY, Plan Administrator, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 04-1012.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 12, 2004.
    Decided Feb. 23, 2004.
    Mark A. Ward, Appellant pro se. John Edward Pueschel, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, P.L.L.C., Winston-Salem, North Carolina; William McCardell Furr, John T. McDonald, Willcox & Savage, Norfolk, Virginia; Lucretia Smith Guia, Haynsworth, Baldwin, Johnson & Greaves, L.L.C., Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM.

Mark A. Ward seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion for sanctions, delineating discovery, and granting the defendant’s motion for a protective order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Ward seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED