Case ID: ad_270/html/0939-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Saul Wolf, Respondent, v. Irving Furie, Appellant.
   Action to recover, by way of damages, the amount of commissions which plaintiff alleges he would have received had not the defendant, as a purchaser of real property, by virtue of a conspiracy, false and fraudulent representations, and breach of contract deprived him thereof. Order denying motion of defendant for judgment on the pleadings reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. There are no factual allegations upon which can be predicated the conclusion that the sale had been effected through the instrumentality of plaintiff as broker. (Newberry & Co. v. Warneche é Co., 267 App. Div. 418, affd. 293 N. Y. 698; Sieven v. Glazer, 267 App. Div. 969, motion for leave to appeal denied, 292 N. Y. 726; Sieven V. Glazer, 268 App. Div. 1052.) Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.