Case ID: ohio-st-3d_53/html/0265-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ressing.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Ressing (1990), 53 Ohio St. 3d 265.]
    (No. 90-403
    Submitted April 11, 1990
    Decided September 12, 1990.)
    
      J. Warren Bettis, disciplinary counsel, and Karen B. Hull, for relator.
    
      Charles W. Kettlewell, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Thus, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent for having violated DR 1-102(A)(6). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.