Case ID: ga-app_28/html/0432-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

10528.
    ENGLISH et al. v. ROSENKRANTZ.
    Under the ruling of the Supreme Court reviewing on certiorari the judgment of this court in this case, that judgment must be vacated; and the judgment of the superior court is reversed on the main bill of exceptions and affirmed on the cross-bill of exceptions.
    Decided April 11, 1922.
    Action on contract; from Eulton superior court — Judge Pendleton. February 11, 1919.
    
      Brewster, Howell & Heyman, Mark Bolding, for English et al.
    
    
      V. A. Batchelor, Spalding, MacDougald & Sibley, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

An opinion in this case was rendered by this court, affirming the judgment of the superior court on both the main and the cross-bill of exceptions. See English v. Rosenkrantz, 26 Ga. App. 234 (105 S. E. 729). A writ of certiorari was granted by the Supreme Court; and upon a hearing of the cause that court affirmed the ruling of this court as to the cross-bill of exceptions, and reversed our ruling as to the main bill of exceptions, holding that “ it was error to overrule the demurrer to the petition as amended.” For the full opinion see 152 Ga. 726 (111 S. E. 198). Under this ruling the judgment formerly rendered by this court must be vacated; and the judgment of the superior court is reversed upon the main bill of exceptions, and affirmed upon the cross-bill.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.