Case ID: njl_122/html/0379-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ANGELO DiMEGLIO, RESPONDENT, v. SLONK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Submitted February 17, 1939
    Decided April 21, 1939.
    For the respondent, George Pellettieri.
    
    For the appellant, Samuel D. Lenox.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.