Case ID: nw2d_928/html/0222-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN RE RHEA BRODY LIVING TRUST, DATED JANUARY 17, 1978, as amended.
    Robert Brody, Intervenor-Appellant, v. Cathy B. Deutchman, Petitioner-Appellee, and Michael Barton, Special Fiduciary, Intervenor, and Jay Brody, Intervenor-Appellant.
    SC: 158599 COA: 330871
    Supreme Court of Michigan.
    June 14, 2019
    Order
   On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 7, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Court of Appeals opinion holding that the terms "child" and "beneficiary" in MCL 700.1105(c) are not modified by the phrase "and any other person that has a property right in or claim against a trust estate," as this holding was unnecessary to resolving this case in light of its conclusion that Petitioner Cathy Deutchman was an "interested person" under MCR 5.125(C)(33)(g) and MCL 700.7603(2). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.