Case ID: ad_216/html/0736-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dowling, J.:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William S. Evans, Respondent, v. Star Company, Appellant.
    
      Libel — excessive verdict set aside by Appellate Division unless reduction stipulated.
    
    Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on April 10, 1925, upon the verdict of a jury for $125,000, being $100,000 compensatory damages and $25,000 punitive damages, rendered after a trial at the New York Trial Term, and also from an order entered on April 14, 1924, denying a motion for a new trial. (See 124 Mise. 177.)
   Dowling, J.:

In my opinion, upon the record herein the recovery is excessive, and I vote to reverse the judgment and grant a new trial, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless plaintiff consents to a reduction of the verdict to the sum of $50,000. If such stipulation be filed, the judgment as so modified and the order appealed from should be affirmed, without costs. Merrell and Finch, JJ., concur; McAvoy and Martin, JJ., dissent and vote for affirmance. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce the judgment as entered to" the sum of $50,389.84, in which event the judgment as so modified and the order appealed from are affirmed without costs.