Case ID: ad3d_50/html/1151-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Oscar Justin R., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.
    [856 NYS2d 489]
   In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Weinstein, J.), dated July 27, 2007, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated June 19, 2007, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation under the supervision of the Probation Department of the County of Kings for a period of 12 months.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency (see Matter of David H., 69 NY2d 792 [1987]; Matter of Charles S., 41 AD3d 484 [2007]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish that the appellant committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree (see Penal Law § 130.65 [3]).

Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility is primarily a matter to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses, and its determination should be accorded great deference on appeal (see Matter of Tanasia Elanie E., 49 AD3d 642 [2008]; Matter of Christian M., 37 AD3d 834 [2007]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the findings of fact were not against the weight of the evidence (cf. CPL 470.15 [5]).

The appellant’s remaining contention is without merit. Fisher, J.P, Ritter, Florio and Garni, JJ., concur.