Case ID: f-appx_325/html/0252-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In Re: J. Harold SMITH, Petitioner.
    No. 09-1120.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 21, 2009.
    Decided: May 28, 2009.
    J. Harold Smith, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. '
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

J. Harold Smith petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order compelling the district court to rule on his motion and seeking recusal of the district court judge.

Our review of the district court’s docket sheet reveals that the court has ruled on Smith’s motion. Accordingly, because the district court recently decided Smith’s case, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.