Case ID: teiss_7/html/0233-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "ST. PAUL, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 4756.
    (Court of Appeal, Parish of Orleans.)
    HENRY T. ROUX vs. R. L. WITZMANN AND I. ADORNO.
    January 10, 1910.
    Jos. A .Casey, Chas. Rosen for plaintiff and appellee.
    H. B. McMurray, Jr., for defendant and appellant.
   ST. PAUL, J.

The question of law involved in this case is certified to the Supreme Court.

February 9, 1910.

ST. PAUL, J. — This case was certified to the Supreme Court, and the question submitted whether under Act 68 of 1908 the holder and discounter of the note sued on can recover the face .value thereof notwithstanding that the note had been discounted at a higher rate of interest than 8%.

That Court answered that “the note sued on is not usurious. This entitles plaintiff to an affirmance of the judgment appealed from.

Judgment affirmed.