Case ID: sw3d_237/html/0242-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Brock Anthony GRIFFITH, Appellant.
    No. WD 67577.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Oct. 30, 2007.
    Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before HOWARD, C.J., and HOLLIGER and SPINDEN, JJ.
   Order

PER CURIAM.

Brock Griffith appeals his convictions of burglary, stealing, and tampering with a motor vehicle. Griffith alleges that the trial court plainly erred by not sua sponte prohibiting the prosecuting attorney from arguing facts not in evidence during closing arguments. Because no facial plain error is evident, we do not grant plain error review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).