Case ID: ohio-law-abs_1/html/0783-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "r THE COURT.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 806
    SZAKAL v. STATE
    Ohio Appeals, 2nd District, Montgomery County
    No. 524.
    Decided June 29, 1923
    5. INTOXICATING LIQUORS.
    Affidavit in the language of the statute relating transporting of liquor, held sufficient.
   r THE COURT.

Epitomized Opinion

Szakal was indicted for transporting whiskey in i City of Dayton. As the affidavit under which ; defendant was convicted did not state the places >m which and to which said transportation was d, or explain a failure so to do, the accused imed that it was insufficient. In sustaining the iviction, the Court of Appeals held:

I. The criminal act charged in the affidavit, ■to/ ;, transport’ng liquor, is definitely set forth in : statute and where the affidavit follows the lan-ige of the statute it is sufficient. (Citing Oras State, decided by Judge Snediker of the Common s Court of Montgomery County.)