Case ID: so2d_574/html/0790-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edrel A. CORY v. PEARL, INC., d/b/a Boy Blue & Pinkey’s Florist, et al.
    1900056.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Jan. 4, 1991.
    Darryl C. Hardin, Tuscaloosa, for appellant.
    Jay F. Guin of Tanner & Guin, Tuscaloosa, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court’s judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s claim was obviously based upon “facts” that are now argued on appeal in support of the judgment of dismissal, which “facts” were never before the trial court and thus could not have properly served as the basis for the dismissal, we reverse the judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, HOUSTON and KENNEDY, JJ., concur.