Case ID: sw3d_570/html/0675-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the INTEREST OF N.S.:
    Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. L.S. (Father), Appellant.
    WD 82071
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Filed: April 2, 2019
    Bruce B. Brown, Kearney for appellant.
    William E. Shull, Liberty; Joseph W. Vanover, Kansas City and Juliann W. Graves, Overland Park, for respondent.
    Before Division Three: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judges
    ORDER
   Per Curiam

L.S. ("Father") appeals from the judgment terminating his parental rights to his son, N.S. ("Son"). Father contends the evidence was insufficient to support the circuit court's finding that he abandoned Son and that termination of his parental rights was in Son's best interest. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).