Case ID: f-appx_57/html/0126-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, v. Sean JONES, Appellant.
    No. 01-2898.
    United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
    Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) Feb. 10, 2003.
    Decided Feb. 24, 2003.
    
      Before ALITO and McKEE, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZEIt, Senior District Judge.
    
    
      
       The Honorable William W Schwarzer, Senior District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
    
   OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Sean Jones, pled guilty to bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. He was sentenced to eight hours of imprisonment, three years of supervised release, a fine of $600.00, a special assessment of $50.00, and restitution in the amount of $8,255.00. After receiving multiple reports that the defendant had violated his supervised release, the District Court revoked the supervised release and sentenced the defendant to serve four months of imprisonment and two years and eight months of supervised release as well as to continue restitution payments beginning 30 days after his release from custody. This appeal followed.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and Third Circuit Local Appellate Rule 109.2(a), defendant’s counsel certifies that, based on her review of the record, she “can find no non-frivolous issues for appeal.” After engaging in an independent review of the record, see United States v. Youla, 241 F.3d 296, 299-300 (3d Cir.2001), we agree and therefore affirm the judgment of revocation of supervised release commitment. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.