Case ID: f-appx_707/html/0169-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN RE: James B. CURRY, Petitioner.
    No. 17-1998
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: December 21, 2017
    Decided: December 27, 2017
    James B. Curry, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James B. Curry petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has failed to follow this court’s instruction to determine whether he received the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. After this court remanded to the district court to make the determination, the district court found that Curry might not have received the report and recommendation and ordered the district court clerk to resend it to Curry. The district court docket reflects that Curry has received the report and recommendation and filed objections to it. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition, the supplemental petitions, and Curry’s pending motions to investigate misconduct, to compel, and to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED