Case ID: ind_15/html/0367-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lawrence and Another v. Huffer.
    
      Friday, December 14.
    APPEAL from the Bartholomew Common Pleas.
    
      F. T. Ilord, for appellants.
    
      S. Stansifer, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Suit upon a note. Answer: setting, up a set-off. No reply. Judgment for the plaintiff, for the amount of the note. On the pleadings the set-off was admitted. After the trial, the Court permitted the plaintiff to file a reply. This could not be done. Redman v. Taylor, 3 Ind. 144, and cases cited. It was not shown in this case that a reply had been filed before the trial, nor that the defendant supposed there had been.

The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.