Case ID: cal_156/html/0203-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      THE COURT.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[L. A. No. 2301.
    Department Two.
    August 24, 1909.]
    E. C. PECK, Appellant, v. O. A. STASSFORTH et al., Respondents.
    Street Assessment—Name of Street—Change of Name on Map.— Judgment and order affirmed on the authority of Peck v. Strassforth, ante, p. 201.
    APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. George H. Hutton, Judge.
    The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Peck v. Stassforth, ante, p. 201.
    A. J. Sherer, and Edward Winterer, for Appellant.
    Shankland & Chandler, for Respondents.
   THE COURT.

For the reasons given in the opinion in E. C. Peck v. O. A. Stassforth et al, ante, p. 201, [103 Pac. 918], this day decided, the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.