Case ID: ind-app_78/html/0657-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Nichols, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sharp et al. v. Pillsbury Flour Mills Company.
    [No. 11,328.
    Filed November 16, 1922.]
    
      Appeal. — Briefs.—Absence of Statement of Evidence. — Questions Presented. — Where appellant’s only assigned error is the overruling of his motion for a new trial, and the grounds for a new trial stated in the motion require a consideration of the evidence, no error is presented where appellant fails to include a statement of the evidence in his brief.
    From Miami Circuit Court; Albert Ward, Judge.
    Action by the Pillsbury Flour Mills Company against Charles Sharp and Ralph Overman, doing business under the firm name and style of Sharp and Overman. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    
      Tillett & Lawrence, for appellant.
    
      Guy R. York and Ellis E. Sluss, for appellee.
   Nichols, P. J.

— Action by appellee against appellants to recover damages for an alleged breach of sale of a written contract for the sale of goods and merchandise. There was a trial by jury and a verdict for appellee, on which judgment was rendered.

The only error assigned is the action of the court in overruling appellants’ motion for a new trial, the causes for which motion each pertain to the evidence. No error is presented for the reason that there is no statement of the evidence in appellants’ brief.

' Judgment affirmed.