Case ID: ark_337/html/0372-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Virginia Sue PRICE v. Charles Raymond PRICE
    98-368
    990 S.W.2d 514
    Supreme Court of Arkansas
    Opinion delivered April 29, 1999
    
      Arnold, Arnold & Potter, by: Clarke D. Arnold, for appellant.
    No response.
   Per Curiam.

Appellant Virginia Sue Price moves for a rule on the clerk and shows the court the following facts. On June 17, 1997, a divorce decree involving the appellant and her husband, Charles Raymond Price, was signed by the trial court. On August 8, 1997, Charles Raymond Price died. On June 19, 1998, the divorce decree was entered of record, and on December 11, 1998, a notice of appeal was filed by the appellant.

The notice of appeal was clearly not filed within thirty days of the final decree as required by Ark. R. App. P.—Civil 4(a). The appellant, however, cites this court to the case of Childress v. McManus, 282 Ark. 255, 668 S.W.2d 9 (1984), for the proposition that the death of a party nullifies the validity of a subsequent divorce decree. We agree that that is the holding of the Childress case. In Childress, however, we also said: “It is not necessary to appeal from a void order because it never became effective. A void order is subject to collateral attack.” (Citing authority.) Childress, 282 Ark. at 258, 668 S.W.2d at 11.

The motion for rule on the clerk is denied. The appellant’s remedy, as stated in Childress, is to attack the void divorce decree collaterally.