Case ID: f-appx_539/html/0289-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William Leslie BARRETT, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. USA-SOCIAL SECURITY; Kathleen Sebelius; USA/Eric Holder, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 13-1589.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 24, 2013.
    Decided: Sept. 26, 2013.
    William L. Barrett, Appellant Pro Se. Edward D. Gray, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellees.
    Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Leslie Barrett, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint for failure to state a claim and denying his motion for reconsideration. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Barrett’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Barrett has forfeited appellate review of the court’s orders. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barrett v. United States, No. 5:10-cv-00469-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 20, 2013; Apr. 24, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.