Case ID: so2d_558/html/0556-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "CALOGERO, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Louisiana v. Stanley PROPHET.
    No. 89-K-2947.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    March 30, 1990.
   In re Prophet, Stanley; Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KA88 1782; Parish of East Feliciana, 20th Judicial District Court, Div. “A” No. 9-86-48306.

Prior report: La.App., 552 So.2d 773.

Denied.

CALOGERO, J.,

concurs in denial.

“Harmlessness” under Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967) does not turn on whether the erroneously admitted evidence is “cumulative.”