Case ID: sd_50/html/0080-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DILLON, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE ex rel CARLSON et al, Plaintiffs, v. MEDIN, Defendant
    (208 N. W. 404.)
    (File No. 6200.
    Opinion filed April 16, 1926.)
    Mortgages^ — Certiorari—Certiorari Will Not Lie to Vacate Order Confirming Sale on Foreclosure of Mortgage.
    Certiorari will not lie to vacate order confirming sale on execution on foreclosure of mortgage; that being a final appealable order.
    Note. — See, Headnote, American Key-Numbered Digest, Mortgages, Key-No. 526(8), 27 Cyc. 1717.
    Original proceeding in certiorari by the State, on the relation of Orie R. Carlson and others, against John T. Medin and others.
    Writ denied.
    
      Johnson & Simoros, of Sioux Falls, for Plaintiffs.
    
      Boyce, Warren & Fairbanks, of Sioux Falls, for Defendants.
   DILLON, J.

This is an original proceeding in which plaintiffs seek to vacate, by certiorari, the order of John T. Medin, judge of the Second judicial circuit of South Dakota, confirming a sale on execution to defendant Frank Haines on the foreclosure of a mortgage.

Under the decision of this court in Casey v. Smith et al., 153 N. W. 918, 36 S. D, 36, an order of confirmation of sale is a final, appealable order. An appeal is the proper remedy for plaintiffs, and certiorari will not lie. It is true that in State ex rel. Kunz v. Campbell, 60 N. W. 32, 3 S. D. 636, this court did entertain a certiorari proceeding under similar circumstances, but in that case the question was not raised as to whether the order in question was an appealable order.

The writ is denied.

MISER, Circuit Judge, sitting in lieu of SHERWOOD, J.