Case ID: so3d_226/html/1085-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Martha ZAMORA and Odilio P. Fuentes, Appellants, v. TOWER HILL PRIME INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
    No. 3D16-1917
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed October 4, 2017.
    David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Perry & Neb-lett, P.A., and David A. Neblett and Jack Wynn, for appellants.
    Methe & Rockenbach, P.A., and Kara Berard Rockenbach (West Palm Beach), for appellee.
    Before LOGUE, LUCK and LINDSEY, JJ.
   ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Martha Zamora and Odilio P. Fuentes, the plaintiffs below, appeal an order granting'final summary judgment in favor of their insurer, Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company. Upon Tower Hill’s commendable confession of error, and because genuine issues of material fact exist as to the amount of the actual cash value of the insured loss at hand, we reverse the final summary judgment and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings. See § 627.7011(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016); Siegel v. Tower Hill Signature Ins. Co., 3D16-1861, 225 So.3d 974, 977, 2017 WL 3722502, at *3 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 30, 2017); Francis v. Tower Hill Prime Ins. Co., 224 So.3d 259 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Reversed and remanded.