Case ID: sw2d_934/html/0016-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Delores C. FAGERBERG, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Charles E. FAGERBERG, Respondent/Appellant.
    No. 69166.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Oct. 15, 1996.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 18,1996.
    Harold G. Johnson, Mitchell D. Johnson, St. Ann, for respondent/appellant.
    Joseph A. Rathert, Fenton, for petitioner/respondent.
    Before CRAHAN, P.J., GRIMM and HOFF, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

ORDER

In this dissolution case, the trial court awarded wife $700 per month maintenance. Husband appeals; we affirm.

Husband raises two points. He alleges the trial court erred in: (1) granting maintenance to wife contrary to § 452.335.1, RSMol994, because she is in good health and able to support herself, and (2) granting maintenance to wife contrary to § 452.335.2 because husband is disabled and, with the maintenance payment, is unable to meet his own needs.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)0.