Case ID: nc_332/html/0655-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BRUCE McKINNON MEYERS v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and THE STATE PERSONNEL COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
    No. 119A92
    (Filed 19 November 1992)
    On appeals by the defendants pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 105 N.C. App. 665, 415 S.E.2d 70 (1992), which affirmed the order entered 10 October 1990 by Brown (Frank R.), J., in Superior Court, Craven County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 5 October 1992.
    
      David P. Voerman, for plaintiff-appellee.
    
    
      Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General, by Ann Reed, Senior Deputy Attorney General, for defendant-appellant Department of Human Resources of the State of North Carolina.
    
    
      Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General, by Norma S. Harrell, Special Deputy Attorney General, for defendant-appellant The State Personnel Commission of the State of North Carolina.
    
   PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the opinion by Lewis, J., the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

On 24 June 1992, this Court allowed the petition of the defendant-appellant, State Personnel Commission, for discretionary review of the additional issue as to whether the Personnel Commission is a necessary party. We now determine that discretionary review of that issue was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.