Case ID: so2d_350/html/0564-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Donnie W. PARKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 77-921.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Oct. 7, 1977.
    Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, Bar-tow, and Stephen 0. Rushing, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed, but this case is remanded for resen-tencing of appellant. The present sentence does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975), Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). Moreover, the sentence imprisons appellant “at hard labor” for which there is no statutory authority. Speller v. State, 305 So.2d 231 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). The appellant does not have to be present at resentencing.

SCHEB, Acting C. J., and OTT and RYDER, JJ., concur.