Case ID: so2d_736/html/0071-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sabina Maria VAN TUYN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 98-1429.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 9, 1999.
    Frederick C. Sake, Miami Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before COPE, GODERICH, and GREEN, JJ.
   REVISED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Based upon this court’s decision in Peart v. State, 705 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 8d DCA), review granted, 722 So.2d 193 (Fla.1998), the appellant’s petition for writ of error coram nobis was properly denied. In so holding, we certify conflict with Gregersen v. State, 714 So.2d 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA), review granted, 728 So.2d 205 (Fla.1998).

Affirmed.