Case ID: a2d_769/html/0133-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BREEZEVALE LIMITED, Appellant, v. Timothy L. DICKINSON, et al., Appellees.
    No. CA10818-94.
    District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
    Jan. 31, 2001.
    Before WAGNER, Chief Judge; TERRY, STEADMAN,* SCHWELB* FARRELL, RUIZ,* REID, GLICKMAN, and WASHINGTON, Associate Judges.
    
      
       Associate Judge Glickman has recused himself from this case.
    
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellees’ petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, the response thereto, appellees’ motion for leave to file the lodged reply brief in support of petition, and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that appellees’ motion for leave to file the lodged reply brief is denied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED by the merits division * that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of September 21, 2000, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall simultaneously file new briefs on or before February 20, 2001, and shall file responsive briefs no later than March 2, 2001. Each party shall file ten copies of its briefs. These new briefs shall be specifically designed for consideration by and addressed to the en banc court and shall supersede all briefs previously filed in this appeal. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that any requests for extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and will be granted only upon a showing of good cause.