Case ID: f-appx_211/html/0234-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James Edward WILLIAMS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. F.H. BASSETT, III, Doctor at Central Prison; M. Curzan, Doctor at Central Prison; M. Suma, Doctor at Central Prison; Doctor Samidi; Doctor Umesi, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 06-6938.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 21, 2006.
    Decided: Jan. 3, 2007.
    James Edward Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges.
    
      Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

James Edward Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Umesi, No. 5:05-ct-00539-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.