Case ID: f2d_923/html/0047-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael Anthony KLIEBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UPJOHN COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 89-3406.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Jan. 22, 1991.
    C. John Caskey, Baton Rouge, La., for plaintiff-appellant.
    John J. Weigel and Vivian L. Madison, Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carr-ere & Denegre, New Orleans, La., for Upjohn Co.
    Kathleen A. Manning and Henri Wol-brette, III, McGlinchey, Stafford, Cellini & Lang, New Orleans, La., for Pfizer, Inc.
    Wm. F. Bologna, Habans & Bologna, New Orleans, La., for American Cyanamid Co., etc.
    Joseph P. Gordon, Jr., Phillip C. Rouse, and Henry A. Alsobrook, Jr., Adams & Reese, New Orleans, La., for Bristol-Myers Co. and E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.
    Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
   BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.