Case ID: nys_150/html/1078-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BREWSTER, Respondent, v. BASTIAN BROS. CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    November 11, 1914.)
    Action by George Brewster against thé Bastían Bros. Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Held, assuming error to been committed in receiving in evidence the opinion of plaintiff’s expert witnesses, to the effect that the machine was not pronerly guarded, still we think the error was not so prejudicial to the defendant as to require a reversal of the judgment. See, also, 149 N. Y. Supp. 1072; 150 N. Y. Supp. 1078.