Case ID: so2d_596/html/0774-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel Dean HENDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 91-2146.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    April 6, 1992.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Carl S. McGinnes, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Suzanne G. Printy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The sentence imposed against the appellant is a departure sentence, Robinson v. State, 520 So.2d 1 (Fla.1988), but no reasons for departure were given. Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. Because the sentencing transcript reveals that the trial judge did not know that he was imposing a departure sentence, on remand he may consider a departure sentence. See State v. Betancourt, 552 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1989). The trial court is directed to give the appellant credit for all time served as of the date of resen-tencing. See Brown v. State, 584 So.2d 209 (Fla.1991).

BOOTH, BARFIELD and ALLEN, JJ., concur.