Case ID: ad2d_98/html/0994-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frank P. Pleto, Jr., Appellant, Linda M. Pleto, Respondent.
   — Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Except in the most compelling circumstances, which are not present in this case, the parties to a matrimonial action should not waste their assets and court’s time seeking review of an order of temporary alimony (see Sterlace v Sterlace, 63 AD2d 450, 453). A prompt trial is the most effective means to resolve any claimed inequities in temporary alimony awards (see Chernofsky v Chernofsky, 90 AD2d 765; Hahn v Hahn, 65 AD2d 782; Steinfink v Steinfink, 65 AD2d 621). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Cook, J. — temporary maintenance and child support.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green,

O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.