Case ID: sw2d_821/html/0135-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anna BILIC, Claimant/Appellant, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES, Employer/Respondent.
    No. 60083.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Jan. 14, 1992.
    Ray B. Marglous, Julia L. Gray, Ray B. Marglous, P.C., St. Louis, for claimant/appellant.
    
      Larry D. Valentine, Rietmann & Goess-ing, St. Louis, for employer/respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission allowing compensation and affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge against her former employer. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to 84.16(b).