Case ID: sw2d_852/html/0431-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Roger Dale FREEMAN, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.
    No. 62507.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    May 18, 1993.
    Raymond Legg, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for defendant, appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Millie Aulbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff, respondent.
    
      Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRIST and REINHARD, J.J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the dismissal, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears; an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).