Case ID: ad2d_225/html/0557-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Marcella S., Respondent, v Karl T., Appellant.
    [639 NYS2d 86]
   Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Family Court correctly determined that the defense of "contraceptive fraud” is not relevant to the issue of paternity (see, Matter of L. Pamela P. v Frank S., 59 NY2d 1).

We have considered the appellant’s remaining contentions and find that they do not warrant reversal. Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.