Case ID: so2d_91/html/0661-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FLORIDA TITLE & ABSTRACT COMPANY and Irene B. Clyatt, Appellants, v. NATHIDA, Inc., Appellee.
    Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A.
    Dec. 5, 1956.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 21, 1957.
    Green & Bryant, Ocala,, for appellants.
    Sturgis & Sturgis, Ocala, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

■ The decree is affirméd. On the basis of the rule announced in Thomás' v. Thompson, 114 Fla. 833, 155 So.' 321, 'the proof is adequate to meet the requirements of our decision in J. C. Vereen & Sons v.'Houser, 123 Fla. 641, 167 So. 45.

Affirmed.

; DREW, C. J., -HOBSON and -THOR-NAL, JJ., and GILLIS, Associate Justice, ■ concur. - - -, ■