Case ID: pa_203/html/0249-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Mestrezat,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Grow v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Company, Appellant.
    Argued May 7, 1902.
    Appeal, No. 106, Jan. T., 1902, by-defendant, from order of C. P. McKean Co., June T., 1901, No. 318, refusing a change of venue in case of G. N. Grow v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Company.
    Before McCollum, C. J., Mitchell, Brown, Mestrezat and Potter, JJ.
    Reversed.
    June 4, 1902:
   Opinion by

Mr. Justice Mestrezat,

The reasons assigned in the application for a change of venue in this case are the same as those in Willoughby et al. v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railroad Company, in which an opinion has this day been filed. The same learned judge heard both applications and refused them for the same reasons. We are, therefore, compelled to reverse the order of the court below, and remand the case for a rehearing of the application in accordance with the views expressed in the opinion filed in the Willoughby case.

Order reversed with a procedendo.