Case ID: f-appx_505/html/0957-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OVERSTOCK.COM, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and Newegg, Inc., and Magnell Associate, Inc., (doing business as Newegg.com), Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 2012-1629.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    May 15, 2013.
    Mark C. Fleming, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP, of Boston, MA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Lauren B. Fletcher, Anna Lumelsky and Yin Zhou. Of counsel on the brief were Jan M. Conlin and Emmett J. McMahon, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, LLP, of New York, New York.
    Edward R. Reines, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, of Redwood Shores, CA, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was Timothy C. Sauls-bury. Of counsel on the brief were Kent E. Baldauf, Jr., Daniel H. Brean and Bryan P. Clark, The Webb Law Firm, of Pittsburgh, PA, for defendants-appellees, Newegg, Inc., et al.; John H. Barr, Jr., Jeffrey L. Oldham and Christopher A. Shield, Bracewell & Giuliani, LLP, of Houston, TX, for defendant-appellee, Overstock.com, Inc.
    Before DYK, LINN, and PROST, Circuit Judges.
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.