Case ID: so2d_595/html/1048-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. WARNER, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Barry M. SILVER, Appellant, v. LOLA INVESTMENTS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.
    No. 91-0572.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    March 11, 1992.
    Rehearing Denied April 20, 1992.
    Barry M. Silver, pro se.
    Lynne K. Hennessey, Boca Raton, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY and STONE, JJ., concur.

WARNER, J., dissents with opinion.

WARNER, Judge,

dissenting.

I would reverse the entry of the temporary injunction as appellee neither alleged nor proved, nor did the court find, that appellee had a clear legal right to the relief requested. There is a substantial question as to whether or not the contractual right sought to be asserted is barred by the statute of frauds, and the existence of such a defense appears on the face of appellee’s verified complaint. Furthermore, at the motion to dissolve filed by appellant, the court actually modified the injunction at the request of appellee, all without a proper motion or admissible evidence presented. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.610(d).