Case ID: so2d_644/html/1039-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronald MINCY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 94-1452.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 23, 1994.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Donald Tunnage, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Leslie Schreiber and Elliot B. Kula, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and GREEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Wright v. State, 586 So.2d 1024, 1029 (Fla.1991) (“Peremptory challenges based on bare looks and gestures are not acceptable reasons unless observed by the trial judge and confirmed by the judge on the record.”); Sloppy v. State, 522 So.2d 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1219, 108 S.Ct. 2873, 101 L.Ed.2d 909 (1988).