Case ID: ohio-law-abs_1/html/0395-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "AUCK, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 399
    U. S. PRINTING & LITHO. v. CRITES et al.
    Ohio Appeals, 4th Dist.
    June 16, 1921
    15 App. 63
    ONTRACTS — Subject-matter definite, when — Agreement to supply requirements — Partnership • liability — Similar business but firms not identical:
    Attorneys — C. A. Leist'and Charles H. May, for aintiff in error; Chas. Gerhardt, contra.
   AUCK, J.

Error to Pickaway Common Pleas .; judgment reversed.