Case ID: nj_16/html/0454-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOSEPH KURTZ AND DAVID BUSCH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BENJAMIN OREMLAND, PEARL OREMLAND, DAVID LEWIS AND ALBERT M. GREENFIELD & CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. JOSEPH KURTZ AND DAVID BUSCH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. DUNN’S ENGLISH LEATHER SHOP, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, AND LOUIS W. DUNN AND JESSIE R. DUNN, AND ALBERT M. GREENFIELD & CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
    Argued November 8 and 15, 1954
    Decided November 22, 1954.
    
      Mr. Bernard Hellring argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Greene \& Hellring, attorneys).
    
      Mr. David M. Perslcie, Mr. William Elmer Brown, Jr., and Mr. Garl Kisselman argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Perslcie and Perslcie, and Messrs. Brown and Franlc, attorneys).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Haneman in the court below. 33 N. J. Super. 443 (Ch. Div. 1954).

For affirmance — Justices Heher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld and Burling — 4.

For reversal — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Jacobs and Brennan — 3.