Case ID: sw2d_856/html/0376-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mark C. SUTTON, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Deborah S. SUTTON, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. 62735.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    June 29, 1993.
    Deborah J. Tomich, Knight, Schoeneberg & Tomich, St. Charles, for petitioner, appellant.
    J. Patrick Winning, Janis B. Powell, Patrick Winning & Associates, St. Louis, MO, for respondent, respondent.
    Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals from that portion of the dissolution decree awarding general care, custody, and control of the couple’s minor daughter to mother. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).