Case ID: nj-eq_81/html/0207-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Ctjeiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Philip J. Bowers, appellant, v. City of East Orange, respondent.
    [Argued November 21st, 1912.
    Decided March 3d, 1913.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in 80 N. J. Eq. (10 Buch.) 1.
    
    
      Mr. Ralph E. Lum (Messrs. Lum, Tamblyn &• Golyer on the brief), for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Borden D. Whiting, for the respondent.
   Pee Ctjeiam.

The decree is affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion in Bowers v. Bloomfield, just decided, ante p. 168.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swaxze, Trenchard, Bergen,- Mjnturn, Kalisoh, Bogbrt, Vredenburgi-i, Congdon, TRBACX — 11.

For reversal — None.