Case ID: misc2d_96/html/0063-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Elizabeth Benlian, Respondent, v Herbert Vartabedian, Defendant. Julius Blaushield, Appellant.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    June 5, 1978
    APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Julius Blaushield, appellant pro se. Maurice Abrahams for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order of the court below (see 91 Misc 2d 968) affirmed, without costs.

While we disagree with the lower court’s finding that plaintiff was not entitled to the appointment of a receiver, nevertheless we agree with its determination denying the receiver’s motion to fix compensation, since special circumstances have not been shown to exist (East Chatham Corp. v Iacovone, 25 AD2d 622; CPLR 5228; 8 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, pars 8004.06, 8004.09).

Concur: Pino, P. J., and Weinstein, J.; Thompson, J., taking no part.