Case ID: cust-ct_7/html/0294-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 46449.
    Protest 10616-K of Anco Import Corp. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the items consist of spangles slung, similar to those involved in Fashion Trimming Cory. v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 462), the claim at 60 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1503 was sustained, holding the merchandise in question dutiable as “articles not ornamented with beads, spangles, or bugles, not embroidered, tamboured, appliqued, or scalloped, composed wholly or in chief value of spangles.”