Case ID: okla_121/html/0123-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DRUM v. DRUM.
    No. 17262
    Opinion Filed July 13, 1926.
    (Syllabus.)
    Appeal and Error — Service of Case-Made After Time a Nullity.
    A case-made served after the expiration of the time for service is a nullity and confers no jurisdiction on the Supreme Court to review the appeal.
    Error from District Court, Osage County; Jesse J. Worten, Judge.
    Action between Charles Drum and Ethel Drum. Judgment for the latter and the former appeals.
    Appeal dismissed.
    Hargis & Yarbrough and O. L. Williams, for plaintiff in error.
    G. B. Sturgell, S. T. Carman, Lydick & McPherren, and M. E. Jordan, for defendant in error.
   PER CURIAM.

This is .a divorce action. Defendant in error was decreed a divorce by the district court ofi Osage county on the 21st day of November, 1925. On the 24th day of November, 1925, plaintiff in error filed a motion for a new trial, and also filed notice of intenticn to appeal, as provided in divorce actions. On the 7th day of December, 1925, motion for a new trial was overruled and plaintiff in error gave notice of appeal and was given 60 days in which to serve case-made, which expired on the 5th day of February, 1926. Case-made was served on the 5th day of March, 1926, one month after the time for service had expired. A case-made served after the expiration.-of the time for service is a nullity and confers no jurisdiction on the Supreme Court to review the appeal. The appeal is dismissed.

Nota. — See 4 C. J. p. 353 §1997.