Case ID: ala-app_25/html/0668-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SAMFORD, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

139 So. 921
    Nelson POE v. STATE.
    
      7 Div. 824.
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    Feb. 16, 1932.
    Cockrell & Riddle, of Talladega, for appellant.
    Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.
   SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted on a charge of violating the prohibition law. The evidence for the state tended to prove the charge as laid. That for the defendant was but a denial. The question was for the jury. There is no prejudicial error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.