Case ID: so2d_699/html/1046-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James BROOKER a/k/a, Roosevelt Brister, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 96-3169.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 8, 1997.
    Nathaniel L. Barone, Jr., for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Doquyen T. Nguyen, Assistant Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
    Before NESBITT, COPE and FLETCHER, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the plea colloquy and sentencing order, we conclude that the plea agreement was for a sentence as a habitual violent felony offender, including the mandatory minimum sentences associated therewith. See § 775.084(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1988); Brister v. State, 622 So.2d 552, 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). That being so, the mandatory minimum sentences were within the legal authority of the court to impose. The order denying motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed.