Case ID: seld-notes_1/html/0169-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

De Lancey against Ganong.
    
      Lease; forfeiture of term.
    
   The denial, orally, by a tenant for life or years of his landlord’s title, and the assertion that he owns the lands in fee and owes no one rent for them, does not work a forfeiture of the term, or authorize the landlord to maintain ejectment for the lands demised.

Mere words can never work a forfeiture of an estate for life or years.

Default in the payment of the rent, where there is a covenant for its payment, and no condition in the lease providing for a re-entry in case of such default, does not work a forfeiture of the term.

The words “yielding and rendering” in a lease, import a covenant, but not a condition, unless the landlord would otherwise be without remedy in case the rent should not be paid.

(S. C., 12 Barb. 120; 9 N. Y. 9.)