Case ID: nj-eq_141/html/0366-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stanley Yeskel, &c., appellant, v. Murray Holding Co., &c., respondent.
    [Submitted October 31st, 1947.
    Decided January 29th, 1948.]
    
      Messrs. Scholland •& Scholland (Mr. Joseph J. Schotland, of counsel), for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. Durand, Ivins & Garlón (Mr. James D. Garlón, Jr., of counsel), for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stein, and reported at 140 N. J. Eq. 195.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Colie, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Preund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.