Case ID: f-appx_10/html/0519-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James M. WOODS, an individual, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, an Administrative Agency of the United States, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 99-56927.
    D.C. No. CV-98-06148-WDK.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted May 8, 2001.
    
    Decided May 21, 2001.
    Before RYMER, HAWKINS, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The lawyer for appellant was not present in the courtroom, so the case was submitted on the briefs.
    
   MEMORANDUM

We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its thorough and well-reasoned decision and order denying James M. Woods’s (‘Woods”) motion for summary judgment and granting Department of Housing and Urban Development’s motion for summary judgment.

In addition, Woods alleges that the district court failed to resolve his evidentiary objections. This allegation is not correct. The district court disposed of the evidentiary objections in footnote 2 of its decision and order.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.