Case ID: ohio-st-2d_28/html/0213-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State, ex rel. Toerner, Appellant, v. Common Pleas Court of Hamilton County, Juvenile Division, et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as State, ex rel. Toerner, v. Common Pleas Court (1971), 28 Ohio St. 2d 213.]
    (No. 71-396
    Decided December 29, 1971.)
    
      Messrs. Boelter, Fisher & Sullivan and Mr, James H. Sullivan, Jr., for appellant.
    
      Mr. Simon L. Leis, Jr., prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Leonard Kirschner, for appellees.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reason that the complaint for a writ of prohibition does not state a cause of action. Prohibition is not a substitute for appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Schneider, Herbert, Corrigan, Stern and Leach, JJ., concur.