Case ID: ccpa_57-2/html/1017-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PEE CUKIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

423 F. 2d 1253; 165 USPQ 326
    Donald D. Williams and Hughes Aircraft Company, V. The administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space administration
    (No. 8712)
    United States Court and Patent Appeals,
    April 16, 1970
    
      Robert F. Kemf, attorney of record, for Appellee. Leonard, Rawvicz, John B. FarmaMdes, Paul F. Arseneau, of Counsel.
    
      John M. Lee, Fulwider Patton, Rieber Lee é TJtecht, Richard R. Trexler, Olson, Trexler, "Wolters <£• Bushell and Richard P. Behultze, Attorney for Appellant.
    Before Rich, Almond, Baldwin and Lane, Associate Judges.
    
   PEE CUKIAM:

This 42 U.S.C. 2457 (d) appeal comes before the court on appellee’s motion to dismiss on the ground that a private agreement dated February 28, 1964, stating that neither party shall appeal to the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals any determination by the Patent Office of a right to title in certain listed inventions, divests this court of jurisdiction. Appellant Hughes opposes the motion and alleges that said agreement is null, void and of no legal effect.

The private agreement is not a pant of the Patent Office record on appeal before this court. Since the validity of the agreement has been questioned by Hughes, and since neither party asserts that this court is the proper forum to determine the validity of said agreement, the court will not consider said agreement until such time as the validity theerof has been determined by a court of competent jurisdiction.

Appellee’s motion to dismiss is DENIED.