Case ID: f-appx_95/html/0035-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jerry BLOW, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, Incorporated; BCTW & GM Local Union 203-T, Defendants—Appellees, and James M Harkless, Oscar B. Giles, Jr., Defendants.
    No. 03-2335.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 31, 2004.
    Decided: April 19, 2004.
    Jerry Blow, Appellant pro se.
    Kimberlee W. DeWitt, Hunton & Williams, Richmond, Virginia; James J. Vergara, Jr., Vergara & Associates, Hopewell, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Jerry Blow seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motions for summary judgment in his action under the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185 (2000), in which he attacked an arbitrator’s decision in favor of his former employer. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Blow v. Philip Morris USA No. CA-03-201 (E.D.Va. Oct. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED