Case ID: njl_103/html/0199-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per. Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WILLIAM T. NEWBURY, APPELLANT, v. RULIFF V. LAWRENCE, JUDGE, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Submitted May 28, 1926
    Decided September 16, 1926.
    Oil appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N. J. Mis. R. 267.
    For the appellant, James Mercer Davis.
    
    For the respondents, Slokes & McDermott.
    
   Per. Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Hone.