Case ID: sw2d_57/html/1117-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "LATTIMORE, Judge. HAWKINS, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Roy BURLESON v. STATE.
    No. 15838.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Feb. 8, 1933.
    Rehearing Denied March 22, 1933.
    M. L. Bennett, of Normangee, and J. T. Ryan, of Centerville, for appellant.
    Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.
   LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for theft of hogs; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. The indictment, the charge of the court, the judgment, and sentence appear regular.

The judgment will be affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

HAWKINS, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing, appellant insists that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. It seems strange that such matter should be urged in the face of the fact that no evidence presented in the trial of the case is before this court. In the absence of a statement of facts, we must presume that the verdict found support in the evidence.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.