Case ID: so2d_843/html/0831-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "STUART, Justice. \n      JOHNSTONE, Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte Dee Cee SKINNER. (In re Dee Cee Skinner v. State of Alabama).
    1011869.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Aug. 30, 2002.
    Susan G. James of Law Firm of Susan G. James & Associates, Montgomery, for petitioner.
   STUART, Justice.

WRIT DENIED. NO OPINION.

HOUSTON, SEE, LYONS, BROWN, HARWOOD, and WOODALL, JJ., concur.

MOORE, C.J., and JOHNSTONE, J., dissent.

JOHNSTONE, Justice

(dissenting).

I respectfully dissent from the denial of the petition for a writ of certiorari. In my opinion, we should grant the writ and review the decision by the Court of Criminal Appeals to the extent that it overrules Williams v. State, 665 So.2d 955 (Ala.Crim.App.1994), and to the extent that it holds the omission of allegations of enhancement factors in an indictment not to be a jurisdictional bar to enhancement of a sentence.