Case ID: ad2d_25/html/0742-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Schenley Industries, Inc., Respondent, v. Herbert Allen et al., Individually and as Partners Doing Business under the Name of Allen & Co., Appellants.
   Order entered February 24, 1966, granting examination of respondents in order to frame a complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to respondents-appellants, the motion denied and the application dismissed. In order to obtain an examination to frame a complaint, plaintiff; should present facts fairly-indicating a cause of action against the adverse party. (Cotler v. Retail Credit Co., 18 A D 2d 898.) There is no such showing here.

Concur — -Rabin, J. P., McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.