Case ID: sw3d_456/html/0861-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David Ray FUGATE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 100521
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: December 9, 2014
    
      Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appel-'* lant.
    Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
    Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J., and Glenn A. Norton, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

David Ray Fugate appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).