Case ID: f-appx_705/html/0314-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Joseph Louis HENNING, Defendant-Appellant
    No. 16-41187 Summary Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Filed December 5, 2017
    Paul Anderson Hable, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s. Office, Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Joseph Louis Henning, Pro Se
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Joseph Louis Henning has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hen-ning has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cíe. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published'and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.