Case ID: so2d_613/html/0481-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carlos E. PACANINS, Appellant, v. Carmen Cleary De PACANINS, Appellee.
    No. 92-1915.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 29, 1992.
    Rehearing Denied March 16, 1993.
    Richey, Munroe, Fine, Goodman & Armstrong, and Alan S. Fine, Miami, for appellant.
    Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik, and Paul A. Louis, and Frank Nussbaum, and John L. Zavertnik, Miami, for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order granting a temporary injunction because appel-lee has failed to show a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, and the likelihood of irreparable harm because of unavailability of an adequate remedy at law. See Russell v. Florida Ranch Lands, Inc., 414 So.2d 1178 (Fla. 5th DCA1982); Oxford International Bank and Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 374 So.2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dismissed, 383 So.2d 1199 (Fla.1980).

Reversed and remanded with instructions to dissolve the temporary injunction.