Case ID: nj-eq_112/html/0089-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John H. Miller et al., respondents, v. William F. Headley et al., appellants.
    [Decided January 5th, 1933.]
    
      Messrs. King <& Vogt and Mr. Samuel C. Meyerson, for the respondents.
    
      Mr. William F. Headley, for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder, and reported in 109 N. J. Eq. 436.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 16.

For reversal — Hone.