Case ID: f-appx_474/html/0288-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David A. HOSKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES Congress; United States of America; United States Supreme Court; State of North Carolina, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 12-6573.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 21, 2012.
    Decided: June 26, 2012.
    David A. Hoskins, Appellant Pro Se.
    
      Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
   Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David A. Hoskins appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hoskins v. United States Cong., No. 5:11-ct-03186-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 22, 2012). We further deny Hoskins’ motion for transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.