Case ID: so2d_440/html/0693-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NEW SOUTH INVESTMENTS, INC., Appellant, v. Albert I. HAIMES and Harold B. Haimowitz, Appellees.
    No. AS-150.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Nov. 23, 1983.
    John F. Callender of Turner, Ford & Cal-lender, Jacksonville, for appellant.
    Ellis E. Neder, Jacksonville, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

New South Investments, Inc. appeals an order dismissing, with prejudice, its second amended complaint for a real estate broker’s commission. We reverse.

The second amended complaint for a real estate broker’s commission sufficiently alleges a cause of action as required by Rule 1.110(b), Fla.R.Civ.P. Accordingly, the order of dismissal is reversed and the cause is remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

MILLS, THOMPSON and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.