Case ID: f-appx_42/html/0940-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Elias GOMEZ-SERRANO, aka Raul Romero-Gomez, aka Francisco Gonzalez-Garcia, aka Jose Arzate-Osorio, aka Elias Serrano-Gomez, aka Ramiro Pineda-Gomez, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 01-50185.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 22, 2002.
    
    Decided Aug. 1, 2002.
    Before: BROWNING, KOZINSKI, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Elias Gomez-Serrano appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Gomez-Serrano’s counsel has filed a motion pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating there are no arguable issues for review and seeking to withdraw as counsel of record. Gomez-Serrano has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues for review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.