Case ID: so3d_225/html/0312-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FABRICA DE FIDEOS RIVOLI, S.A., Appellant, v. FAMEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED, Appellee.
    No. 3D17-10
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed July 19, 2017.
    Dorta Law, and Matías R., Dorta, for appellant.
    Jones & Adams, P.A, and Matthew L. Jones, for appellee.
    Before LAGOA, SCALES and LUCK, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Fabrica de Fideos Rivoli, S.A., the defendant below, appeals a non-final order denying its motion to dismiss the instant action for lack of personal jurisdiction. Concluding that the trial court correctly applied the two-prong test for determining whether personal jurisdiction may be exercised over a nonresident defendant, we affirm. See Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499, 502 (Fla. 1989) (providing that personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant exists where: (1) the complaint alleges sufficient jurisdictional facts to satisfy Florida’s long-arm statute, section 48.193 of the Florida Statutes; and (2) the nonresident defendant has sufficient minimum contacts with Florida to satisfy constitutional due process concerns).

Affirmed.