Case ID: mich_80/html/0615-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People v. George H. Brown, and The People v. George Gooseman.
    [Two oases.]
    
      Criminal law — Police court of Grand Rapids — Jurisdiction.
    •These cases are ruled by People v. Gooseman, ante, 611.
    Exceptions before judgment from superior court op Grand Bapids. (Burlingame, J.)
    Argued May 1, 1890.
    Decided May 9, 1890.
    Respondents were convicted of keeping their saloons open on Sunday.
    Conviction affirmed, and court advised to proceed to judgment.
    The facts are stated in People v. Gooseman, ante, 611.
    
      Eggleston & McBride, for respondents.
    
      B. W. Huston, Attorney General, and W. J. Stuart, 
      Prosecuting Attorney (Stuart, Knappen & Weaver, of counsel), for the people.
   Per Curiam.

These two cases are governed by People v. Gooseman, ante, 611, and the conviction in each is affirmed, and the superior court of Grand Eapids directed to proceed to judgment upon the verdict.