Case ID: so2d_104/html/0611-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. PEARSON, Judge", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edna M. DE VEAUX, Appellant, v. The BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF DADE COUNTY, Florida, a public corporation under the laws of the State of Florida, and Joe Hall, as Superintendent of Public Instruction of Dade County, Florida, Appellee.
    No. 58-88.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    July 30, 1958.
    R. P. Terry, Miami, for appellant.
    Boardman, Bolles, Davant & Lloyd, Miami, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Armistead v. State ex rel. Smyth, Fla.1949, 41 So.2d 879; Bradshaw v. Pinkston, Fla.1951, 53 So.2d 525. See also Pippin v. State ex rel. Town of Blountstown, 73 Fla. 363, 74 So. 653, 655; and State ex rel. Burr v. Tavares & G. R. Co., 78 Fla. 329, 82 So. 833, 835.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON, J., concur.

PEARSON, J., concurs specially.

PEARSON, Judge

(concurring special-bO-

While I agree that the discharge of the writ of mandamus was without error because the object sought to be accomplished was then moot, I feel that this final judgment was not determinative of all the issues in the cause. The petitioner should be left to such other remedy as may be available to her.