Case ID: njl_76/html/0817-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HERBERT LIGHTHIPE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. CITY OF ORANGE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted July 6, 1908
    Decided November 16, 1908.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 46 Yroom 365.
    For the plaintiff in error, William A. Lad.
    
    For the defendant in error, Ghauncey G. Parher.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review in this case is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Pitney in the court below.

For affirmance—The Chiee Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenoi-iard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 15.

For reversal—Fone.