Case ID: f-appx_285/html/0660-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anne WHEATLEY, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee, v. MOES SOUTHWEST GRILL, LLC, Mama Fus Noodle House, Inc., Raving Brands Holdings, Inc., H. Martin Sprock, III, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees Cross-Appellants, John Doe, Jane Doe, Defendants.
    No. 07-14390.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    July 18, 2008.
    Robert E. Casey, Jr., Guy Hagai Weiss, Casey, Gilson & Liebel, P.C., Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee.
    David R. Hughes, Davis, Pickren & Seydel, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees Cross-Appellants.
    Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, PRYOR, Circuit Judge, and JOHNSON, District Judge.
    
      
       Honorable Inge P. Johnson, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Alabama, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM:

This diversity case centers on a controversy on whether Plaintiff was entitled to restricted or unrestricted shares of stock. Plaintiff says unrestricted. The District Court granted summary judgment to Defendants on the ground that no enforceable contract existed between the parties for unrestricted shares of stock. We affirm the judgment: as a matter of law, insufficient evidence supports the contention that unrestricted shares were contemplated by the parties.

On the issues dealing with sanctions, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion.

AFFIRMED.