Case ID: f_88/html/0989-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "ROSS, Circuit Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PERRIS IRR. DIST. v. SAVINGS & TRUST CO. OF CLEVELAND, OHIO, et al.
    (Circuit Court, S. D. California.
    June 29, 1898.)
    No. 659.
    Wm. J. Hunsaker, for Savings & Trust Co. and others.
    Works & Lee, for Perris Irr. Dist.
   ROSS, Circuit Judge.

The cross bill in this case is substantially similar to that in the case of Alessandro Irr. Dist. v. Savings & Trust Co. of Cleveland (just decided) 88 Fed. 928. For the reasons given by the court for overruling the demurrer to the cross bill in that case, an order will be entered herein overruling the demurrer, with leave to the defendants to answer within 20 days.