Case ID: utah_2/html/0121-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Emerson, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ISAAC WOOLF, Respondent, v. LORD CLAUD HAMILTON et al., Appellants.
    I. FORMER Case Affirmed. — Kalin et al. v. Hamilton et al., ante, referred to and affirmed, and judgment herein reversed in accordance ■with the views expressed in that case.
    Appeal from the Third Judicial District Court.
    The facts appear in the opinion.
    
      Bosborough c& Merritt and J. G. Sutherland, for appellants.
    See brief in Kahn v. Hamilton, ante.
    
    
      J. B. McBride, for respondent.
    See brief in Kahn v. Hamilton, ante.
    
   Emerson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The demand of the plaintiff in this action had the same origin as that sued for in Kahn et al. v. Hamilton et al., just decided, and the facts on which this plaintiff seeks to charge these defendants are the same as in that case. Therefore, the reasons given for the judgment in that case must govern this. Judgment reversed with costs.

BoRUMAN, J., concurs.

Schaefitee, O. J., dissents.