Case ID: f-appx_70/html/0984-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DUNKIN’ DONUTS INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. BARR DONUT LLC, A New York Limited Liability Company, Defendant, and Alexander BARRETT, et al., Defendants— Appellants.
    No. 02-16933.
    D.C. No. MC-02-00008-WDB.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 17, 2003.
    
    Decided Aug. 8, 2003.
    Before KLEINFELD, WARDLAW, Circuit Judges, and POGUE, CIT Judge.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
    
      
       The Honorable Donald Pogue, U.S. Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Appellee was granted summary judgment in the civil action underlying this Privacy Act appeal. The franchise agreement is terminated, and no timely appeal has been filed in the S.D.N.Y. action. There is no “effectual relief’ this panel could grant under Church of Scientology v. United States. This appeal is therefore moot.

APPEAL DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     
      
      . 5 U.S.C. § 552a.
     
      
      . See Dunkin’ Donuts v. Ban Donut, 242 F.Supp.2d 296 (S.D.N.Y.2003).
     
      
      . 506 U.S. 9, 113 S.Ct. 447, 121 L.Ed.2d 313 (1992).