Case ID: us_287/html/0563-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 46.
    Brown et al. v. Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. et al.
    Jurisdictional statement submitted September 15, 1932.
    Decided October 10, 1932.
   Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to affirm the decree herein, and for an award of damages pursuant to § 878, Title 28, U. S. Code, is denied. The appeal in this cause is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. Western Crawford Road Improvement District, 266 U. S. 187; Miller & Lux v. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District, 256 U. S. 129; Houck v. Little River Drainage District, 239 U. S. 254.

Messrs. Wm. H. Watkins and A. F. Gardner for appellants. Messrs. Julian C. Wilson and Walter P. Armstrong for appellees.