Case ID: njl_113/html/0506-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

COE L. SMITH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CLARENCE SMITH AND ANNA V. W. SMITH, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
    Argued May 16, 1934
    — Decided September 27, 1934.
    
      Eor the appellant, Ward & McGinnis (Peter J. McGinnis, of counsel).
    Eor the respondent, Dolan Dolan (William A. Dolan, of counsel).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam ini the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Pbrskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.