Case ID: nys_84/html/1143-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BLANCHARD, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROBBINS, Respondent, v. BRIDGMAN, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    November 18, 1903.)
    Action by Marcus Robbins against Malcolm L. Bridgman. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
    Charles H. Luscomb, for appellant.
    Maas & Goldberg, for respondent.
   BLANCHARD, J.

The only question which appears to have been seriously litigated in this action was whether or not the plaintiff’s assignor was able, to secure a theatrical license, as contemplated by the agreement of August, 1902. ¿This was a question of fact, which the trial justice resolved in favor of the plaintiff, and we think his determination is fully justified by the evidence in the case. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.