Case ID: sw2d_787/html/0786-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronald PRINCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 56495.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    March 6, 1990.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 11, 1990.
    Application to Transfer Denied May 15, 1990.
    Michael C. Todt, Marc B. Fried, St. Louis, for appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Robert P. Sass, Asst. At-tys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial after an evi-dentiary hearing of his motion to vacate sentence pursuant to Rule 27.26 (now repealed). We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).