Case ID: or-app_65/html/0696-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted November 7,
    affirmed as modified November 23, 1983
    ESTATE OF MAH, Respondent, v. ESTATE OF SOO, Appellant.
    
    (82-654; CA A27491)
    671 P2d 1208
    David A. Dorsey, Coos Bay, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Bedingfield, Joelson, Gould, Wilgers and Dorsey, Coos Bay.
    Gary D. Rossi, Coos Bay, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Rossi & Borneman, Coos Bay.
    Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Young, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

On de novo review of this proceeding against an estate, the trial court’s decision is modified by deleting sub-paragraph (6) of paragraph SEVENTH of the decree and judgment relating to a condominium located in Hong Kong. In all other respects, the decree and judgment is affirmed.

Decree modified to eliminate award to plaintiff of one-half interest in Hong Kong condominium; affirmed as modified.