Case ID: ga_88/html/0068-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Wallace v. Johnson et al.
    
    Practice in Supreme Court.
    Where three creditors petition under the traders’ act of 1881 for injunction and the appointment of a receiver, and the petition is granted after making a fourth creditor a party to the petition, one of the creditors cannot bring to this court a writ of error founded,, not upon the judgment itself, but upon a reason given by the judge to the effect that in granting the injunction and receiver he did not consider this alleged creditor as having a valid debt, such reason being no adjudication of that question, and there being no order dismissing the petition as to any of the creditors. The statement of the judge as to his reason is no adjudication, final or otherwise, upon the rights of this particular creditor.
    November 10, 1891.
    Simmons & Corrigan, for plaintiff in error.
    R. J. Jordan, by brief, contra.
    
   Writ of error dismissed.