Case ID: f-appx_46/html/0469-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rene Joseph DELHOMME, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Susan YEARWOOD, in her official and individual capacity; M. Beams, in his individual and official capacity; Rabbit, MTA, in her individual capacity, Defendants-Appellants, and Charles I. Hooper; et al., Defendants.
    No. 01-16738.
    D.C. No. CV-98-00735-WBS.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 9, 2002.
    
    Decided Sept. 16, 2002.
    Before HUG, O’SCANNLAIN, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Rene Joseph Delhomme, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials refused to provide him with a suitable diet for diabetes, failed to transfer him to a medical facility, and failed to treat related complications with his eyes, ears, teeth and kidneys. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s summary judgment. Margolis v. Ryan, 140 F.3d 850, 852 (9th Cir.1998). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendants because the record does not indicate a triable issue that Dr. Beams, Rabbit, or Warden Year-wood were deliberately indifferent to Delhomme’s medical needs. See McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1061-62 (9th Cir. 1991), overruled on other grounds by WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir.1997).

Delhomme’s remaining contentions lack merit.

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.