Case ID: so2d_569/html/1371-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Rickey Lane POPE and Stanley Hurst, Appellees.
    Nos. 89-3333, 89-3358.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Nov. 16, 1990.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellant.
    Gary Baker, Callahan, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

We decline to extend the defense of recantation to the charge of tampering with physical evidence. We therefore reverse that portion of the trial court’s order dismissing the tampering charge based on suc^ defense and affirm the order of dismissal in all other respects,

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

WENTWORTH, MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.