Case ID: f_152/html/0616-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BRADFORD et al. v. UNITED STATES.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    March 19, 1907.
    On Rehearing, April 9, 1907.)
    No. 1,564.
    ■ ‘ In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Uouisiana.
    •' Edgar H. Farrar, Frank U. Richardson, and Thos. J. Kernan (Richardson & Soule, on the brief), for plaintiffs in error.
    W. 'W. Howe, U. S. Atty., and Rufus E. Foster, Asst. U. S. Atty.
    Before McCORMICK and SHEEBY, Circuit Judges, and NEWMAN, District Judge. •
   PER CURIAM.

In this case Bradford and Wright were tried together in the Circuit Court and found guilty on certain counts of the indictment. They reserved a bill of exceptions, and sued out a writ of error to this court. The trial judge, Hon. Charles Parlange, annexed to the bill of exceptions an elaborate statement of the case, and of his reasons for his several rulings complained of and to which exceptions were reserved. Those reasons are given in United States v. Bradford et al. (C. C.) 148 Fed. 413, 430. The opinion there reported deals with and decides all the material questions argued at the bar and in the briefs submitted in this court. After careful consideration of the argument and the briefs, we have reached the same conclusions announced by the learned trial judge. We are of opinion, therefore, that there is no reversible error in the record.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

■On Rehearing.

In this cas.e the plaintiffs in error present applications for rehearing. They do not;show any ground therefor that induces us to believe that a rehearing might result in our changing the views announced in the decision of the case heretofore rendered.

eThe application for rehearing is therefore denied