Case ID: ny-2d_61/html/0976-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Cale Development Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, v Conciliation and Appeals Board et al., Respondents.
    Argued February 21, 1984;
    decided March 22, 1984
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Anthony Napolitano and Jon Michael Probstein for appellants.
    
      Cullen S. McVoy, Ellis S. Franke and Mary Ellen Cronly for Conciliation and Appeals Board, respondent.
    
      Stanley M. Ackert, III, for Daniel Gersen, respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Sullivan (94 AD2d 229). We also note that the Board found that the actual occupants of the apartment under the lease were Robert J. Castle and his wife and that the apartment was not their primary residence. That being so, Michael Castle, their son, had no right to renewal of the lease based upon section 235-f of the Real Property Law (L 1983, ch 403).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.