Case ID: f-appx_18/html/0167-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eddie CURRENCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRUCE HARDWOOD FLOORING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a Bruce Hardwood Flooring; Triangle Pacific Corporation, d/b/a Bruce Hardwood Flooring, a Division of Triangle Pacific Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 00-2393.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted May 31, 2001.
    Decided Sept. 10, 2001.
    Eddie Currence, pro se. Edward Bo-grad, Frederick Martin Thurman, Jr., Shu-maker, Loop & Kendrick, Charlotte, NC; Frank P. Bush, Jr., Bush & Bush, Elkins, WV, for appellees.
    Before WILKINS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Eddie Currence appeals the district court’s order granting relief for Defendants in Currence’s action claiming age discrimination in employment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Currence v. Bruce Hardwood Flooring Ltd. P’ship, No. CA-99-101-2 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.