Case ID: f-appx_182/html/0216-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Duane Montrik BURTON, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 06-6441.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted May 16, 2006.
    Decided May 24, 2006.
    Duane Montrik Burton, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Duane Montrik Burton appeals the district court’s sealed January 31, 2006, order denying his sealed motion dated December 21, 2005. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Burton, No. 7:00-CR-105-1-F (E.D.N.C., Jan. 31, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED