Case ID: njl_77/html/0618-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CuRIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SAMUEL KIRBY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. EDWARD S. LEE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued November 27, 1908
    Decided March 1, 1909.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported ante p. 68.
    For the plaintiff in error, Bennet Van Stjclcel and Bourgeois & Sooy.
    
    For the defendant in error, William M. Clevenger and Joseph II. Gashill.
    
   PER CuRIAM.

The judgment of the Supreme Court should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Reed in that court.

For affirmance—The ChaNcellor, Chief Justice, Gar-KISON, SWAYZE, TRENCIIARD, PARKER, MlNTHRN, BOGERT, VhedeNburgii, Vroom, GRAY, Dill, J.J. 12.

For reversal—None.