Case ID: sw3d_275/html/0834-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harold GRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 69325.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Feb. 10, 2009.
    Felicia L. Boles, Kansas City, for appellant.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, Robert Bartholomew, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before DIV II: HARDWICK, P.J., HOWARD and DANDURAND, JJ.
   Order

PER CURIAM.

Harold Gray appeals the circuit court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, following an evi-dentiary hearing. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Rule 84.16(b).