Case ID: f-appx_533/html/0487-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. David WARREN, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-30560
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    June 28, 2013.
    Holly A. Thomas, Esq., Jared H. Fish-man, Jessica Dunsay Silver, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Tracey Nicole Knight, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Michael W. Magner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Julian R. Murray, Jr., Chehardy, Sherman, Ellis, Murray, Recile, Griffith, Stake-lum & Hayes, L.L.P., Richard T. Simmons, Jr., Attorney, Hailey, McNamara, Hall, Larmann & Papale, L.L.P., Metairie, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

David Warren appeals from the orders of the district court denying his motions for release pending trial and reopening of the initial detention proceeding. The denial of those motions was not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Rueben, 974 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir.1992); United States v. Hare, 873 F.2d 796, 798 (5th Cir.1989).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.