Case ID: ohio-cc_20/html/0711-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(First Circuit—Hamilton Co., O., Cir’t Court
    Jan. Term, 1899.)
    Before Adams, Douglass and Voorhees, JJ.
    [Of the Fifth Circuit, sitting in the First Cirouit.]
    DROTT v. BATEMAN & HARPER.
    
      Partnership — Pirmname — A firmname showing the surname of the partners only is not a fictitious name within meaning of the act of February 13, 1896 (92 O.L., 25).
    (See s. c., 42 B., 1, 27); Af. in Czatt v. Case, 43 W. L. B.,*77.
    Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county.
    
      S. T. Crawford, for Plaintiff in Error.
    
      Alfred Q. Allen, for Defendants.
   PER CURIAM.

A firm name showing the surnames only of the partners, is not a fictitious name, nor a designation not showing the names of the partners within the meaning of the act of February 13, 1896, 92 O. L., 25, requiring every firm doing business under a fictitious name to file and publish a certificate showing the full names and residences of its members.