Case ID: nh_62/html/0700-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

)[Merrimack,
    June, 1883.]
    Fitch v. Nute & a.
    
    
      Gould $ Martin, for the plaintiff.
    
      Leach Stevens, for the defendants.
   Assumpsit. The objection to the maintenance of the action was, that it was brought in the name of the wrong party. Without deciding the question raised, it was held that the writ might, if necessary, be amended at the trial term, and without terms.

Case discharged.

Allen, J.,.did not sit: the others concurred.