Case ID: njl_40/html/0615-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE, HUNT, PROSECUTOR, v. RAHWAY.
    On,error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiff in error, J, H. Stone.
    
    For the defendant in error, Leslie Lupton.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is, affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of that court. 10 Vroom 646.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, ChIef Justice,Dalrimple, Depue, Knapp, Reed, Scudder, Van Syckel, Woodhull, Green, Lathrop. 11.

For reversal—None.