Case ID: sw_142/html/1197-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DAVIDSON, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HILL v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Jan. 17, 1912.)
    Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; Robt. B. Seay, Judge. Jack Hill was convicted of crime, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Dane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The motion for new trial alleges insufficiency of the evidence, and a general statement that the court erred in the charge. There are no specifications as to what errors were committed by the court in the charge. Without the statement of facts, these matters cannot be revised. The judgment is affirmed.