Case ID: njl_132/html/0170-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JAMES CUNNINGHAM, RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD ASHURST, APPELLANT.
    Argued May 17, 1944
    Decided September 14, 1944.
    For the respondent, James M. Davis, Jr.
    
    For the appellant, Howard Fasiwood.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Donges, Porter, Dear, Wells, Rapeerty, Hague, JJ. 8.

For reversal — Case, Heher, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 4.