Case ID: sw2d_858/html/0288-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GLASCO ELECTRIC COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Wayne WIEDEFELD, et al., Defendants/Respondents.
    No. 62324.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    July 27, 1993.
    Garry Seltzer, Clayton, for plaintiff, appellant.
    Walter S. Drusch, Lowes & Drusch, Cape Girardeau, for defendants, respondents.
    Before CRANDALL, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Supplier appeals the trial court’s refusal to enforce a mechanic’s lien.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).