Case ID: f-appx_333/html/0281-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Atlas Valentino LOMELI, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 08-50300.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 14, 2009 .
    Filed Sept. 30, 2009.
    Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Jerry Chenwei Yang, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Elizabeth Newman, FPDCA — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Atlas Valentino Lomeli appeals from the 36-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Lomeli contends that the district court erred at sentencing by placing special emphasis on the criminal conduct underlying his revocation, and by improperly seeking to punish him for such conduct. The record reflects that the district court sentenced Lomeli pursuant to factors that are appropriate under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e). See United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th Cir.2007). Accordingly, the district court did not err and the sentence imposed upon revocation is reasonable. See id. at 1061.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.