Case ID: so2d_191/html/0068-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Agnes Mary SOBOL, Appellant, v. Robert SOBOL, Appellee.
    No. 66-67.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    Oct. 11, 1966.
    Rehearing Denied Nov. 8, 1966.
    Thomas A. Testa, Miami, for appellant.
    Freed & Weill and Richard A. Beiley, Miami, for appellee.
    Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Morrison v. Morrison, Fla.App.1960, 122 So.2d 199, 201, wherein the court states: “It is settled principle of law in this state that a court of equity possesses no power to go back and grant a new right, or impose a new duty not adjudicated in its former decree after it has become final and absolute.” See also McEachin v. McEachin, Fla.App.1963, 154 So.2d 894.