Case ID: sw3d_234/html/0501-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Karl A. RICHARD, Appellant.
    No. ED 87860.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    July 17, 2007.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 29, 2007.
    Application for Transfer Denied Oct. 30, 2007.
    Timothy Forneris, Office of the Missouri Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Victor J. Melenbrink, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, Mo, for respondent.
    Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Karl A. Richard appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of first degree robbery in violation of section 569.020 RSMo 2000, attempted first degree robbery in violation of section 564.011, and two counts of armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015. We find that the trial court did not err in limiting Richard’s counsel’s questions on voir dire. We also find that the trial court did not err in allowing the prosecutor to make certain comments during its closing argument.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 80.25(b). 
      
      . All statutory references are to RSMo 2000.