Case ID: pa-commw_69/html/0381-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carlos Quinones, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent. Julio Matos, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent. Luciano Rosado, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent.
    Submitted on briefs September 13, 1982,
    to President Judge Crumlish, Jr. and Judges Blatt and Mac-Phail, sitting ¡as a panel of three.
    
      
      David A. Scholl, for petitioners.
    
      Charles G. Hasson, Assistant Counsel, with Mm, Richard L. Cole, Jr., Chief Counsel, for respondent.
    October 15, 1982:
   OPINION by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

Carlos Quinones appeals an Unemployment Compensation Board of Review order affirming a referee’s denial of benefits. We vacate and remand.

Quinones was a laborer at Nu-Econo-Brick. Because his work area was poorly heated, he was permitted to leave. Upon returning two days later, his job was gone.

The Employment Security Office found a voluntary quit and denied benefits under Section 402(b) of the Act. On appeal, the referee affirmed the denial but for a different reason of willful misconduct due to excessive absenteeism under Section 402(e). The Board affirmed the referee.

Quinones contends that he was awaiting recall. Neither the Board nor the referee considered this explanation for his absence.

In a willful misconduct ease, the employer has the burden of proving misconduct. Wing v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Pa. , , 436 A.2d 179, 181 (1981).

The question of whether a claimant voluntarily quit or was fired is one of law '.subject .to our review, Wing, as is his burden of rebutting the quit finding. O’Donnell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 66 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 105, , 443 A.2d 864, 865 (1982). There is insufficient evidence for us to make.that legal determination. We will not infer from the absence of findings on a relevant issue that the issue was resolved against a claimant.

Vacated and remanded.

Order

The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review Orders, Nos. B-200356, B-200357 and B-200358, all dated October 20, 1981, are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Board for the making of new and adequate fact finding. 
      
       This appeal was consolidated with the appeals of Julio Matos and Luciano Rosado.
     
      
       Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(b).
     
      
       43 P.S. §802(e).
     
      
       Before this Court, the Board now argues that Quinones voluntarily quit rather than arguing in support of its conclusion that Quinones was guilty of willful misconduct.