Case ID: nys_94/html/1162-08.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SCHENKEL, Appellant, v. LISCHINSKY, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    June 22, 1905.)
    Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District. Action by Jacob Schenkel against Ilochem Lischinsky. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Schleimer & Schleimer, for appellant.
    Samuel Hellinger, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The pleadings were oral. The plaintiff complaining alleged conversion. The defendant, answering, denied generally. The issue thus made was tried, and judgment rendered for the defendant. As there was no evidence of conversion, the judgment will be affirmed, with costs. The issue was not as in Weinberg v. Greenberger (Sup.) 93 N. Y. Supp. 530; hence the result is unlike. Judgment affirmed, with costs.