Case ID: sw3d_557/html/0524-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles E. GENTRY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 106051
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    FILED: September 11, 2018
    Maleaner Ryna Harvey, Office of the State Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Robert Jefferson Bartholomew, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., and Mary K. Hoff, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM

Charles E. Gentry appeals from the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order, Judgment, and Decree of Court" denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).