Case ID: f-appx_124/html/0073-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SIX WEST RETAIL ACQUISITION, INC., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. SONY PICTURES ENTM’T CORP., et al., Defendants-Appellees, Talent Booking Agency, Inc., et al., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees, Sony Elecs. Corp & Sony Theatre Mgmt. Corp. Defendants.
    No. 04-2419.
    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    March 30, 2005.
    Jeffrey H. Howard, Crowell & Moring LLP (Clifton S. Elgarten and Kent A. Gardiner, on the brief), Washington, DC, for Appellant.
    
      Gerson A. Zweifach, Williams & Connolly LLP (John E. Schmidtlein, Christopher N. Manning, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC; Fredric W. Yerman, Phillip A. Geraci, Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, NY, on the brief), Washington, DC, for Sony Appellees.
    Alexander R. Sussman, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP (Brian J. Howard and Sima S. Abuja, on the brief), New York, NY, for Loews Appellees.
    PRESENT: WALKER, Chief Judge, MESKILL, and JACOBS, Circuit Judges.
   SUMMARY ORDER

Six West Retail Acquisition, Inc. appeals from orders of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Loretta A. Preska, Judge): (1) denying its motion for recusal under 28 U.S.C. § 455, Six West Retail Acquisition, Inc. v. Sony Theatre Mgmt. Corp., No. 97 Civ. 5499, 2003 WL 282187 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 7, 2003); (2) denying, by an endorsement dated February 14, 2003, its motion for leave to file an amended complaint; and (3) granting appellees’ motions for summary judgment, Six West Retail Acquisition, Inc. v. Sony Theatre Mgmt. Corp., No. 97 Civ. 5499, 2004 WL 691680 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2004).

Substantially for the reasons stated in the district court’s orders and opinions, we AFFIRM.