Case ID: sw3d_34/html/0218-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Melissa L. LOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barbara M. MUEHLENKAMP, Defendant-Respondent.
    No. ED 77531.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Nov. 28, 2000.
    James S. Collins, II, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Richard C. Wuestling, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Before MOONEY, P.J., SULLIVAN, J., and PUDLOWSKI, Sr. J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Melissa Lott appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in an action arising out of an automobile collision. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).