Case ID: tex-crim_156/html/0575-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MORRISON, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James E. Metcalf v. State
    No. 25629.
    January 9, 1952.
    Hon. A. A. Dawson, Judge Presiding.
    
      Bert Ashby, Dallas, for appellant.
    
      George P. Blackburn State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.
   MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, four years.

No statement of facts accompanies the record.

Bill of Exception No. 1 is to the admission of testimony. There is no showing in the bill as to what the testimony complained of was. The bill does not show that any objectionable testimony was admitted and, therefore, presents nothing for review. Tex. Dig. Crim. Law 1120(4).

Bill of Exception No. 2 seeks to attack the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. We cannot pass upon such a bill without a statement of facts.

What we have said in discussing Bill of Exception No. 2 applies to Bill of Exception No. 3, wherein appellant complains of absence of corroboration of the accomplice’s testimony.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.