Case ID: sw3d_460/html/0480-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel K. MCKAY, Appellant.
    No. ED 101042
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    
    Filed: April 7, 2015
    Margaret M. Johnston, Woodrail Cen-tre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203, for appellant.
    
      Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 8.99, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for respondent.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Daniel McKay (Defendant) appeals the trial court’s order and judgment entered following remand from this Court for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the State could rebut the presumption of prejudice caused by the delay in bringing Defendant to trial and whether Defendant’s right to a speedy trial was violated. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).