Case ID: f-appx_390/html/0282-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Larry Edward HENDRICKS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Henry MCMASTER; State of South Carolina, Respondents—Appellees.
    No. 10-6193.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 20, 2010.
    Decided: Aug. 11, 2010.
    Larry Edward Hendricks, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larry Edward Hendricks appeals the district court’s orders adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Hendricks’ petition for a writ of audita querela and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hendricks v. McMaster, No. 3:09-cv-01924-DCN (D.S.C. Sept. 17, 2009; Jan. 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.