Case ID: ala-app_24/html/0687-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SAMFORD, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(135 So. 926)
    Richard STATHAM v. STATE.
    6 Div. 793.
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    June 16, 1931.
    A. A. Griffith, of Cullman, for appellant.
    Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.
   SAMFORD, J.

The evidence for the state was sufficient to authorize a verdict of guilt as charged in the indictment, and hence the affirmative charge was properly refused.

Refused charges 2 and 4 assert a correct proposition of law, but were fully covered by the court in his oral charge.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.