Case ID: sw3d_532/html/0743-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dayton Eugene DURHAM, Appellant.
    No. ED 104876
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: October 31, 2017
    Ellen H. Flottman, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, for Appellant.
    Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Nathan J. Aquino, Asst. Attorney General, P. 0. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, for Respondent.
    Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr,, P.J. and Sherri B. Sullivan and Kurt S.- Odenwald, JJ. .
   ORDER

Per Curiam

Dayton Durham (“Appellant”) appeals from the judgment entered after a jury trial on his convictions for two counts of first-degree Statutory sodomy, enticement of a child, first-degree child molestation and first-degree child endangerment. We find no abu'se of discretion in the admission of the challenged evidencé and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedehtial value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).