Case ID: sw3d_353/html/0099-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Terease BAKER-BELL, Respondent, v. Latham BELL, Appellant.
    No. ED 96145.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Sept. 20, 2011.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 14, 2011.
    Application for Transfer Denied Dec. 20, 2011.
    Jonathan D. Marks, Creve Coeur, MO, for appellant.
    Danna McKitrick and Jayne T. Woods, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Latham Bell (Father) appeals the circuit court’s judgment approving the relocation of his former spouse, Terease Baker-Bell (Mother), and their two children.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).