Case ID: ohio-st_115/html/0731-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Weintraub v. The Ohio Bell Telephone Co.
    
      Supreme Court — Affirmances—Judges equally divided in opinion.
    
    (No. 19005
    Decided November 16, 1926.)
    Error to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.
    
      Mr. G. Z. Weintraub, and Mr. Frank A. Green, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Messrs. Tolies, Hogsett, Ginn & Morley, Mr. W. T. Kinder, and Mr. J. W. Reavis, for defendant in error.
   It appearing that the judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of the case (one of the judges not participating) and are unable for that reason to agree upon a judgment, the entry of this fact constitutes an affirmance of the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Matthias, Day and Kinkade, JJ., concur.

Jones, J., not participating.