Case ID: ri_65/html/0443-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eva R. Asselin vs. Byron B. Blount et al.
    
    OCTOBER 11, 1940.
    
      James B. Linehan, for petitioner.
    
      Haslarn, Arnold & Sumpter, Harry A. Tuell, for respondents.
    Present : Flynn, C. J., Moss, Capotosto, Baker and Condon, JJ.
    For former opinion, see 65 R. I. 293.
   Per Curiam.

After our opinion in this cause was filed, the respondents, by leavé of court, filed a motion for reargument.

We have carefully considered the reasons advanced by the respondents in support of their motion and are of the opinion that a reargument is not warranted. We may add that a careful reading of our opinion will show that we did not overlook either of the points raised by the respondents in their motion as reasons for a reargument.

Motion for reargument denied and dismissed.