Case ID: sw3d_508/html/0188-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PROPULSION CONTROLS COMPANY, LLC, Appellant, v. Redina BURGE and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
    WD 79368
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    FILED: January 24, 2017
    Attorneys: Casey P. Murray, Kansas City, MO for appellant, Bart A. Matante for respondent State of Missouri; Redina Burge, acting pro se
    Before Division One: Anthony Rex Gabbert, P.J., and Thomas H. Newton and Alok Ahuja, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Redina Burge applied for unemployment benefits after her employment with Propulsion Control Company, LLC was terminated in July ,2015. Propulsion protested the claim on the basis that Burge had been discharged for misconduct. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission found that Burge’s termination was not for misconduct connected with work, and that she was therefore eligible for unemployment benefits. Propulsion appeals, arguing that the Commission’s decision is not supported by competent and substantial evidence. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).