Case ID: so2d_379/html/1311-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

B. A. D., a child, and T. K. C., a child, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. PP-214, PP-215.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Feb. 13, 1980.
    Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender and Carl S. McGinnes, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellants.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The restitution order attending this probation for the two minor appellants is not erroneous for requiring each to repay $172.00, one-third of the aggregate thefts by appellants and another using the same credit card. Assuming that, an evidentiary hearing is not required on the amount of each child’s separate charges on the card. The words “or such other amount deemed due by the probation counselor” are stricken from the order, which is otherwise

AFFIRMED.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., LARRY G. SMITH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.