Case ID: so2d_934/html/0544-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael SKIPWITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D04-3581.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 31, 2006.
    Rehearing Denied May 31, 2006.
    Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine M. Germanowiez, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   On Motion foe ClaRification

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for clarification is hereby granted, and we clarify that this court’s per curiam affirmance of this case is without prejudice to appellant’s raising his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied.

POLEN, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.