Case ID: nj-eq_102/html/0597-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

B. Edward Burr, trustee, v. Joseph Contenti et al.
    [Decided May 14th, 1928.]
    On appeal from a decree in the court of chancery advised by Chancellor Walker.
    
      Messrs. Henn & Burr, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The question presented on this appeal is identical with that considered and determined at the present term in the case of Henn v. Heath, Inc.

For the reason stated in the opinion filed in the case referred to, the portion of the decree appealed from in the present case will be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yan Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 15.

For reversal — -None.