Case ID: pa_612/html/0485-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

31 A.3d 656
    Paul STEVENS, Respondent v. Lisa JACKSON and Thomas Luther, Petitioners.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Nov. 9, 2011.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of November, 2011, Petitioners’ Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, and the Superior Court’s order quashing Petitioners’ appeal is VACATED. This matter is REMANDED for the Superior Court to consider the substance of Petitioners’ appeal. Estoppel is at issue in this case. The fact that genetic testing has occurred has not mooted out that issue; genetic testing does not resolve estoppel issues, and the estoppel issue is still being contested by the parties. Estoppel issues arising in paternity testing cases are immediately appealable. See Jones v. Trojak, 535 Pa. 95, 634 A.2d 201 (1993) and Freedman v. McCandless, 539 Pa. 584, 654 A.2d 529 (1995). Under this authority, parties are not constrained to wait until they file an appeal regarding a custody order to raise an estoppel argument.

Jurisdiction relinquished.