Case ID: so2d_606/html/1289-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lisette MATOS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 91-2682.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Nov. 13, 1992.
    Marc L. Lubet of Law Office of Lubet & Blechman, Orlando, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robin Compton Jones, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in appellant’s contention that the state failed to prove at trial that she embezzled in excess of $20,000 of her employer’s funds. As to the sentence, however, the state acknowledges the combined sentence of community control and probation exceeds the statutory maximum. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment but vacate the sentence and remand for correction.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION.

W. SHARP, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.