Case ID: f-appx_139/html/0914-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kenneth E. TURRENTINE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mike MULLIN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 05-5106.
    United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
    July 1, 2005.
    Kenneth Eugene Turrentine, McAlester, OK, pro se.
    Stephen J. Greubel, Tulsa, OK, for Petitioner-Appellant.
    William L. Humes, Office of the Attorney General State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, for Respondent-Appellee.
    Before LUCERO, McCONNELL, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER AND JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Kenneth Eugene Turrentine, filed an appeal in this matter on July 1, 2005. He appeals two orders entered by the district court on June 21, 2005. The district court’s first order denied Turrentine’s request for the appointment of counsel pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 848(q). The second order granted the withdrawal of Turrentine’s counsel of record, Stephen Gruebel. Taking jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 1331, we order as follows.

We reverse the court’s order denying the appointment of counsel, and direct the district court to obtain replacement counsel for Mr. Turrentine as soon as practicable.

We affirm the district court’s order granting Mr. Gruebel’s motion to withdraw as counsel. 
      
       This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
     
      
      . On June 28, 2005, this court issued an order denying the motion to withdraw of Mr. Turrentine's counsel, Mr. Gruebel. At the time we issued this order, the panel was unaware of the district court’s June 21, 2005 order allowing the withdrawal of Mr. Gruebel on the grounds of conflict of interests. Given the conflict between our June 28 order and the district court's June 21 order, this panel sua sponte withdraws its order denying withdrawal. We hereby grant Mr. Gruebel’s request to withdraw as appellate counsel.