Case ID: so3d_263/html/0133-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Norma Jo SMITH and DGT, Inc., Respondents.
    No. 1D18-844
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    November 13, 2018 Rehearing Denied January 22, 2019
    Christopher M. Cobb and Kayla A. Haines of Jimerson & Cobb, P.A., Jacksonville, for Petitioner.
    Alexander D. Brown and Adam S. Goldman of The Concept Law Group, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Respondents.
   Per Curiam.

In this certiorari proceeding, Petitioner seeks review of the order allowing Respondents to amend their counterclaim against Petitioner to assert a claim for punitive damages. The scope of our review is limited to determining whether the trial court complied with the procedural requirements in section 768.72, Florida Statutes ; we do not have jurisdiction to review the sufficiency of the evidence proffered to support the punitive damages claim. See Simeon, Inc. v. Cox , 671 So.2d 158, 160 (Fla. 1996) ; Globe Newspaper Co. v. King , 658 So.2d 518, 520 (Fla. 1995) ; Munroe Health Systems, Inc. v. Estate of Gonzales , 795 So.2d 1133, 1134 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

Here, the trial court complied with the applicable procedural requirements. Respondents proffered evidence to support their punitive damage claim, and after a hearing, the trial court entered a thorough order finding the proffer to be sufficient to support the claim. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Wetherell and Winsor, JJ., concur..