Case ID: sw2d_962/html/0891-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Darrell & Ruth SCHUETTE, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. John PURCELL, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. 72484.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division.
    Feb. 3, 1998.
    Rehearing Denied March 24, 1998.
    
      Jeffrey P. Hiñe, Osbum, Hiñe, Kuntze & Yates, L.L.C., Cape Girardeau, for appellant.
    Tom K. O’Loughlin II, O’Loughlin, O’Loughlin & McManaman, L.C., Cape Gir-ardeau, for respondents.
    Before CRAHAN, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs in an action for conversion of a horse trailer. There is sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict. No error of law appears.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).