Case ID: nj-super_21/html/0356-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ANTHONY R. DeMARCO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRANCIS ESTLOW, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
    Argued September 15, 1952
    Decided September 22, 1952.
    Before Judges MoGbbhan, Btgelow and Smalley. .
    
      Mr. James D. Stoclcwell argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Bleakly, Stoclcwell •& Zinlc, attorneys).
    
      Mr. James M. Davis, Jr., argued the cause for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Haneman in his opinion filed in the Chancery Division and reported in 18 N. J. Super. 30.