Case ID: f-appx_53/html/0248-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thaddeus D. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 02-1722.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 16, 2002.
    Decided Dec. 19, 2002.
    Thaddeus D. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. James Phillip Naughton, Sara Lynne Berg, Hunton & Williams, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Thaddeus D. Williams appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of United Parcel Service, Inc. on his claims arising under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp.2002). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court, as stated from the bench. See Williams v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., No. CA-01-579 (E.D. Va. June 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.