Case ID: ohio-st-3d_36/html/0236-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State, ex rel. Rhodes, Appellant, v. Van Brocklin, Appellee.
    [Cite as State, ex rel. Rhodes, v. Van Brocklin (1988), 36 Ohio St. 3d 236.]
    (No. 88-17
    Decided May 11, 1988.)
    
      Vincent C. Rhodes, pro se.
    
    
      Gary L. Van Brocklin, prosecuting attorney, and Mary Jane Stephens, for appellee.
   On the basis that appellant has an adequate remedy at law, the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the complaint in mandamus (case No. 87 CA 176) is affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.