Case ID: f-appx_338/html/0671-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ernesto PATINO CARCAMO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 06-73334.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 14, 2009.
    
    Filed July 21, 2009. .
    
      Michael S. Cabrera, Esq., Huntington Park, CA, for Petitioner.
    Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Lindsay L. Chichester, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, CAS-District, San Diego, CA, for Respondent.
    Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Ernesto Patino Cárcamo, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings that were conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Sharma v. INS, 89 F.3d 545, 547 (9th Cir.1996). We grant the petition for review.

The IJ abused his discretion in denying Patino Carcamo’s motion to reopen in light of Patino Carcamo’s undisputed statement that he arrived at court 15 minutes late. See Jerezano v. INS, 169 F.3d 613, 615 (9th Cir.1999) (holding that denying a petitioner’s motion to reopen when he arrived 15 to 20 minutes late was an abuse of discretion).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.