Case ID: ga-app_35/html/0659-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Luke, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

17443.
    Southern v. The State.
    Larceny, 36 C. J. p. 899, n. 34.
    Decided August 4, 1926.
    Larceny of automobile; from Gordon superior court—Judge Tarver. April 19, 1926.
    
      Joseph M. Lang, for plaintiff in error.
    
      G. G. Pittman, solicitor-general, contra.
   Luke, J.

The conviction of the offense of larceny was amply authorized by the evidence. The special assignments of error, complaining of the court’s refusal to continue his ease and upon the court’s rulings upon the admissibility of evidence, are without merit. The plaintiff in error has had a legal trial, and for no reason pointed out in the record did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodioorlh, J., concur.