Case ID: f-appx_4/html/0473-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Albert R. SALMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert E. ROSE, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 00-16546.
    D.C. No. CV-00-00037-JLQ.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 12, 2001.
    
    Decided Feb. 22, 2001.
    Before GOODWIN, LEAVY, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      . The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Albert R. Salman appeals pro se the district court’s partial order of dismissal which granted the motion to dismiss filed by Nevada Supreme Court Chief Justice Robert Rose in Salman’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of his civil rights.

Rose’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction because the district court’s order was not a final, appealable judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir.1981). 
      
      . This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.