Case ID: pa_635/html/0503-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

138 A.3d 609
    BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF WILLISTOWN TOWNSHIP, Respondent v. MAIN LINE GARDENS, INC. and Coffman Associates, LLC, Petitioners. Board of Supervisors of Willistown Township, Respondents v. Main Line Gardens, Inc. and Coffman Associates, LLC, Petitioners. Board of Supervisors of Willistown Township, Respondent v. Main Line Gardens, Inc. and Coffman Associates, LLC, Petitioners. Board of Supervisors of Willistown Township, Respondent v. Main Line Gardens, Inc. and Coffman Associates, LLC, Petitioners. Board of Supervisors of Willistown Township, Respondent v. Main Line Gardens, Inc. and Coffman Associates, LLC, Petitioners. Board of Supervisors of Willistown Township, Respondent v. Main Line Gardens, Inc. and Coffman Associates, LLC, Petitioners.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    June 7, 2016.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue presented by petitioner and rephrased for clarity is as follows: under Rule 227.1 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, where a trial court rules on post-trial motions and expresses reliance on previously filed briefs that fully argue the post-trial issues, may an appellate court nevertheless dismiss the appeal for failure to file an accompanying brief?