Case ID: nj-eq_136/html/0402-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Max Schulman, appellant, v. Herbert Gold, respondent.
    [Decided April 19th, 1945.]
    
      Mr. Walter V. Schwartz, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. George K. Slingland, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The- decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported at 134. N. J. Eq. 532.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Pbrskie, Porter, Colie, Wells, Rafferty, Thompson, Dill, Freund, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Heher, J. 1.