Case ID: sw3d_461/html/0014-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Manuel CAZARES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    ED 101637
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    
    Filed: April 14, 2015
    Amy Faerber, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Rachel Flaster, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
    Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Manuel Cazares appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief after an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law were not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2014).