Case ID: so2d_553/html/0287-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carl MULLINGS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 89-2129.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 28, 1989.
    Carl Mullings, in pro. per.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Giselle D. Lylen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
    Before COPE, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Carl Mullings, appeals from a trial court order denying his motion for post-conviction relief under rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm the order of the trial court based upon a holding that the motion was untimely filed; and the issues raised therein were procedurally barred and/or without merit. Rose v. State, 472 So.2d 1155 (Fla.1985); Zeigler v. State, 452 So.2d 537 (Fla.1984); Brown v. State, 430 So.2d 446 (Fla.1983); Ford v. State, 407 So.2d 907 (Fla.1981); Ponder v. State, 530 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Paez v. State, 512 So.2d 263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Williams v. State, 473 So.2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).