Case ID: se2d_802/html/0730-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cecelia W. PEOPLES and Ernest A. Robinson, Jr. v. Thomas H. TUCK
    No. 423P16
    Supreme Court of North Carolina.
    August 17, 2017
    Donald J. Dunn, Attorney at Law, Goldsboro, Molly M. Schertzinger, Attorney at Law, Jacksonville, Jonathan M. Smith, Attorney at Law, Goldsboro, for Peoples, Cecelia W., et al.
    David O. Lewis, Attorney at Law, Durham, for Tuck, Thomas H.
    ORDER
   Defendant's petition for discretionary review is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals to reconsider its holding in light of United Community Bank (G.A.) v. Wolfe , --- N.C. ----, 799 S.E.2d 269 (2017). See United Cmty. Bank , --- N.C. at ----, 799 S.E.2d at 272 (recognizing that, under N.C.G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(e), a party may not rest upon an affidavit containing merely "conclusory statement[s] without any supporting facts" to create a genuine issue of material fact).:

"Spec Order by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."