Case ID: f-appx_453/html/0358-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Norman Lindsey MAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John ROWLEY, Warden; Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 11-6840.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 15, 2011.
    Decided: Nov. 17, 2011.
    Norman Lindsey Mayes, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Norman Lindsey Mayes appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We agree with the district court that Mayes was afforded sufficient due process. Mayes v. Rowley, No. 1:10-cv-01308-CCB, 2011 WL 1808796 (D. Md. May 12, 2011); (June 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.