Case ID: ala-app_26/html/0702-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SAMFORD, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

152 So. 927
    Eddie WILLIAMS v. STATE.
    5 Div. 915.
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    Jan. 9, 1934.
    Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.
   SAMFORD, Judge.

This cause was tried by the court sitting without a jury, and, while there are some technical errors appearing in the record, the rulings did not probably injuriously affect the defendant’s rights, and none of these errors is of such nature as would justify a reversal.

Giving to the findings of the court the presumption to which they are entitled, we cannot say that the judgment is error, and, finding no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.