Case ID: ny_64/html/0633-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Henry E. P. Sutton, Appellant, v. George T. M. Davis, Executor, etc., Respondent.
    (Argued February 1, 1876;
    decided February 8, 1876.)
    This was an appeal from an order of General Term affirming an order of Special Term denying a motion on the part of plaintiff to attach defendant for alleged contempt.
    The alleged contempt was in the neglect to obey a decree herein requiring defendant to pay over to plaintiff a certain portion of the estate in his hands, and a certain sum for funeral expenses paid. The motion was denied, for the reason that the amount defendant was to pay over, was not specifically or definitely stated, and for the purpose of ascertaining the amount an accounting was directed. Held, that the order, both that portion refusing to punish for the alleged contempt and that directing a reference, was within the discretion of the court, and so not re viewable here; that the latter portion was not a vacation or modification of the decree.
    
      A. J. Requier for the appellant.
    
      Moses Ely for the respondent.
   Per Curiam

opinion for dismissal of appeal.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.