Case ID: sw2d_941/html/0767-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Charles MOORING, Jr., Defendant/Appellant. Charles MOORING, Jr., Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    Nos. 67919, 70164.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    March 18, 1997.
    Nancy L. Vincent, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Fernando Bermudez, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of first degree assault, § 565.050, RSMo 1986, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986. The court found defendant to be a Class X offender and sentenced him to consecutive prison terms of twenty-five years for assault and five years for armed criminal action. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).