Case ID: ny-st-rep_37/html/0390-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Mem.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rosalie A. Oakley et al., Resp’ts, v. Frederick W. Bleckwenn, Treasurer, etc., et al., App’lts.
    
    
      (Court of Appeals,
    
    
      Filed April 28, 1891.)
    
    
      George W. Stephens and J. Langdon Ward, for app’lts ; Joseph H. Choate, for resp’ts.
    
      
       Affirming 35 N. Y. State Rep., 647.
    
   Mem.

The question in this case is the same as that decided by us in case of The People ex rel. Oakley v. Bleckwenn, upon the argument of which this appeal was submitted.

The judgment here appealed from should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs to the respondents.

All concur, exeept Andrews,'J., not voting, and Earl, J., dissenting.