Case ID: ga-app_7/html/0441-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Powell, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

1976.
    Harbuck v. City of Atlanta.
    Certiorari; from Fulton superior court — Judge Ellis. May 25, 1909.
    Argued July 14, 1909.
    Decided February 22, 1910.
    
      Anderson, Felder, Rountree £ Wilson, for plaintiff in error.
    
      W. P. Hill, J. L. Mayson, contra.
   Powell, J.

1. In the main, the case is governed'by the decision this d'ay rendered in Whitley v. Atlanta, supra (67 S. E. 108).

2. “By analogy to the rule in misdemeanor eases, all who participate either directly or aceessorially in the violation of a municipal ordinance may be held as principals.” Toney v. Atlanta, 6 Ga. App. 356 (64 S. E. 1106).

3. The evidence, though weak and circumstantial, is not, legally speaking, insufficient to support the conviction. Judgment affirmed.