Case ID: f-appx_68/html/0526-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Phillip A. CLEMONS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 03-1247.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted June 24, 2003.
    Decided July 21, 2003.
    Phillip A. Clemons, Appellant Pro Se. James Anthony Winn, Assistant Regional, Dina White Griffin, Social Security Administration, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Sara Bugbee Winn, Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Phillip A. Clemons seeks review of the magistrate judge’s order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of Social Security disability insurance benefits to Clemons prior to August 10, 1997, based on its finding that Clemons was not totally disabled until that date. We review the Commissioner’s final decision to determine whether it is supported by substantial evidence and whether the correct law was applied. Pass v. Chater, 65 F.3d 1200, 1203 (4th Cir.1995). We have reviewed the record and conclude the Commissioner’s decision is based upon substantial evidence. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Clemons v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. CA-02-4-4 (W.D.Va. Jan. 28, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       The parties consented to review by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(2) (2000).