Case ID: misc_180/html/0378-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mae Mandula, Respondent, v. Korrol Manufacturing Co., Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.
    
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    May 25, 1943.
    
      Nathan Cooper for appellant.
    
      Emmet L. Holbrook for respondent.
    
      
       See, also, Korrol Mfg. Co., Inc., v. Mandula, 180 Misc. 379. — [Rep.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is -against the overwhelming weight of the credible evidence, oral as well as documentary. The defendant, therefore, is not only entitled to a reversal of the judgment but also to restitution of the sum of $293.23 which represents the judgment obtained by plaintiff in this action.

Judgment, so far as appealed from, reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed in favor of the defendant for $293.23, with costs.

Shientag, Rosbnman and McLaughlin, JJ., concur. 
      
       See Civil Practice Act, § 587. — [Rep.