Case ID: nj-eq_112/html/0171-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Max Berman, complainant, v. One-Forty-Five Belmont Avenue Corporation et al., defendants.
    [Decided January 23d, 1933.]
    
      Mr. Atwood G. Wolf, for the complainant.
    
      Messrs. Lindabury, Steelman, Zinc & Laferty, for the defendants.
   Per Curiam.

The order appealed from -will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, and reported in 109 N. J. Eq. 256.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Kays, Hetfield, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.