Case ID: ga-app_24/html/0188-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Stephens, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

10140.
    King et al. v. Rodgers et al.
    
    Decided September 19, 1919.
    Complaint; from Muscogee superior court—Judge Terrell presiding. September 25, 1918.
    
      Ilalcher & Ilalcher, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      J. E. Chapman, A. W. Cozart, contra.
   Stephens, J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the exceptions of law to the auditor’s report.

2. The court erred in directing a verdict against the defendant upon the 1st, 2d, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th exceptions of facts to the auditor’s report, and in thereafter refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.