Case ID: ga-app_35/html/0395-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodwobth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

17257.
    Robertson v. The State.
    Criminal Law, 16 C. J. p. 698, n. 88; p. 712, n. 30; p. 714, n. 34.
    Decided May 12, 1926.
    Conviction of manufacture ■ of liquor; from Murray superior court—Judge Tarver. February 20, 1926.
    
      II. H. Anderson, for plaintiff in error.
    
      O. G. Pittman, solicitor-general, contra.
   Bloodwobth, J.

The evidence of the accomplice as to the guilt of the accused was direct and positive, and while the evidence of the accomplice must be corroborated, the extent of the corroboration is entirely for the jury. There being some corroborating testimony, this court will not say that the evidence did not authorize the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.