Case ID: f-appx_122/html/0386-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re: GLOBAL HEALTH SCIENCES, INC., Debtor, Global Health Sciences Creditor Trust, as assignee of the assets of Global Health Sciences, Inc., and successor to Plaintiff/Appellant the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, Appellant, v. Richard D. Marconi, Appellee.
    No. 03-55794.
    D.C. No. CV-02-04642-TJH.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Feb. 14, 2005.
    Decided Feb. 25, 2005.
    John M. Grenfell, Robert L. Wallan, Pillsbury Winthrop, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Appellant.
    Mark B. Frazier, Penelope W. Parmes, Rutan & Tucker, Costa Mesa, CA, for Appellee.
    Before KOZINSKI, TROTT, Circuit Judges, and SAND, Senior District Judge.
    
    
      
       Hon. Leonard B. Sand, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation,
    
   MEMORANDUM

The district court did not err in affirming the order of the Bankruptcy Court dismissing the complaint. The creditors’ action to rescind the settlement agreement is barred by California’s litigation privilege, Cal. Civ.Code § 47(b). See Silberg v. Anderson, 50 Cal.3d 205, 266 Cal.Rptr. 638, 786 P.2d 365, 369-72 (1990); Rubin v. Green, 4 Cal.4th 1187, 17 Cal.Rptr.2d 828, 847 P.2d 1044, 1051-54 (1993). Although the litigation privilege does not apply to actions that “sound [] only in contract,” see Bardin v. Lockheed Aeronautical Sys. Co., 70 Cal.App.4th 494, 82 Cal.Rptr.2d 726, 731 (1999), the creditors’ “rescission claim” is in essence based on fraud, a tort.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.