Case ID: la_150/html/1025-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PROVOSTY, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(91 South. 441)
    No. 24814.
    SWANN v. RABB et al.
    (March 27, 1922.
    Rehearing Denied April 18, 1922.)
    Appeal from Eirst Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; J. H. Stephens, Jr., Judge.
    Action by Mrs. M. G. Swann against E. A. Rabb and others. Erom a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
    Affirmed.
    IVilkinson, Lewis & Wilkinson, of Shreveport, for appellant.
    Murff & Mabry, of Shreveport, for appellees.
   By Division A, composed of Chief Justice PROVOSTY and Justices OVERTON and LECHE.

PROVOSTY, C. J.

This suit is based on a state of facts exactly similar to that in the case of Duke v. Crawford, Jenkins & Booth (No. 24784; La.) 91 South. 440, this day decided, and involves the same legal propositions. Eor the reasons there stated, judgment affirmed.

Rehearing refused by Division B, composed of Justices O’NIELL, LAND, and BAKER. 
      
       Ante, p. 1023.