Case ID: so2d_752/html/0131-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael David August DURRANT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D99-2391.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 8, 2000.
    
      Michael David August Durrant, in proper person.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before JORGENSON, COPE, and LEVY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We concur with appellate counsel that treatment of this appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), is appropriate in this case. By pro se brief appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on count four. Assuming this challenge had been made with particularity in the trial court by motion for judgment of acquittal (it was not), it is nonetheless without merit. The evidence was legally sufficient to go to the jury. See State v. Law, 559 So.2d 187 (Fla.1989).

Affirmed.