Case ID: so2d_638/html/0625-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. COPE, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ellen SCHWARTZ and O.M. Schwartz, her husband, Appellants, v. MIAMI HEAT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida Limited Partnership, Florida Basketball Associates, Inc., a Florida corp., Leisure Management Miami, Inc., a Delaware corp., Miami Sports and Exhibition Authority, and Diana Jackson, Appellees.
    No. 93-2136.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 5, 1994.
    Bernard B. Weksler, Coral Gables, for appellants.
    Angones, Hunter, McClure, Lynch & Williams and Christopher Lynch, Miami, for appellees.
    Before HUBBART, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Dean v. Rouillier, 597 So.2d 961 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 606 So.2d 1165 (Fla.1992); see Chateloin v. Flanigan’s Enter., Inc., 423 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ., concur.

COPE, Judge,

specially concurring.

I concur in affirming on authority of Dean v. Rouillier, 597 So.2d 961 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 606 So.2d 1165 (Fla.1992), only. It would be a different case if plaintiffs alleged that the appellees made the decision to route traffic into a high crime area (when a safer alternative was available) and hired the off-duty officer to do so. As pled, the amended complaint only alleges police negligence in the routing of traffic, which, under Dean, is not attributable to appellees.