Case ID: ad_279/html/0595-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sol Kass et al., Respondents, v. Ralph Kaplan et al., Appellants.
   Ho opinion. Holán, P. J., Carswell, Johnston and MaeCrate, JJ., concur; Sneed, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to dismiss the complaint, upon the ground that the judgment improperly extends, by implication, a restrictive covenant to the fifteen-foot parcel which was never subject thereto. (See Kitching v. Brown, 180 N. Y. 414, 427.)