Case ID: ad2d_262/html/0034-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Hamilton, Appellant.
    [690 NYS2d 436]
   —Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Leibovitz, J.), rendered April 3, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first and third degrees, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 15 years to life and 2A!% to 7 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

On the existing record, we find that defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708). Defendant has not shown that he was prejudiced by his counsel’s untimely filing of motions for severance of the robbery counts and suppression of physical evidence, because the record suggests that neither motion would have been successful.

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Mazzarelli, Rubin, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.