Case ID: so2d_163/html/0293-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert HARRISON, Petitioner, v. DORAL COUNTRY CLUB, INC., et al., Respondents.
    No. 33158.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    April 17, 1964.
    Richard A Sicking and Kaplan, Ser, Abrams & O’Malley, Miami, for petitioner.
    Jerry V. Wilkey, Miami, for Doral Country Club, Inc., and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Paul E. Speh and Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 29, 1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us tq conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.