Case ID: us_275/html/0487-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam '.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 44.
    Dunbar-Dukate Company, Incorporated, v. The Celeste Sugar Company, Incorporated.
    Error to the Supreme Court of the Stéte of Louisiana.
    Motion to substitute submitted October 10, 1927.
    Decided October 24, 1927.
    
      Messrs. Rush L. Holland, George E. Strong and C. F. Borah for defendant in error in support of the motion. Messrs. John Dymond, A. Griffin Levy and James Wilkinson for plaintiff in error in opposition thereto...
   Per Curiam '.

The motion to substitute party for defendant in error is denied for the reason that the absence of a substantial federal question requires the Court to grant the motion to dismiss on the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147.