Case ID: so2d_498/html/1065-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jennifer M. PORRO, Appellant, v. Gary M. PORRO, Appellee.
    No. 4-86-2413.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Dec. 19, 1986.
    Gregory S. Burdick, Edna L. Caruso and Philip Burlington of Edna L. Caruso, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Timothy P. McCarthy of Merola, McCarthy & Cox, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We reverse the finding of contempt because we believe the appellant was entitled to testify on her own behalf at the contempt hearing. Our reversal, of course, is without prejudice to the continuation of this contempt proceeding or any other proceedings to support the court’s orders concerning child custody and visitation.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.