Case ID: ohio-st-3d_71/html/0397-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Thrower, Appellant.
    [Cite as State v. Thrower (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 397.]
    (No. 94-1983
    Submitted November 1, 1994
    Decided December 30, 1994.)
    
      
      Albert D. Thrower, pro se.
    
   Per Curiam.

On appeal, appellant argues that the good-cause requirement denies him due process of law because he had no notice of the ninety-day filing requirement. We reject this argument and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Appellant is not entitled to special notice of changes in the law.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.