Case ID: f-appx_669/html/0752-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Francisco DE LA CRUZ-TREVINO, Defendant-Appellant
    No. 16-40066 Conference Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Date Filed: 10/18/2016
    Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Philip G. Gallagher, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Francisco De La Cruz-Trevino raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001). In Daugherty, we rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) and held that “the constitutionality of § 922(g) is not open to question.” Daugherty, 264 F.3d at 518 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.