Case ID: f-appx_225/html/0173-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re: Dejuan Anderko WATKINS, Petitioner.
    No. 07-6217.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 20, 2007.
    Decided: April 30, 2007.
    Dejuan Anderko Watkins, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Dejuan Anderko Watkins petitions for a writ of mandamus claiming there was undue delay by the district court in disposing of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The Government filed a response noting that the district court entered a judgment and order denying the § 2255 motion. In light of the court’s action, we deny as moot Watkins’ petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.