Case ID: f-appx_13/html/0079-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dean Russell CARRICO, Plaintiff-Appellant, and DRC Services, Incorporated, a corporation; Bears Real Estate and Rentals, Incorporated; Bears, Incorporated, Plaintiffs, v. VILLAGE OF SUGAR MOUNTAIN; Jack Anderson, individually and as councilman for the Village of Sugar Mountain; Carlene Hall, individually and as Town Manager and Zoning Administrator for the Village of Sugar Mountain, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 00-1842.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 30, 2000.
    Decided June 18, 2001.
    Dean Russell Carrico, pro se. William Alfred Blancato, McCall, Doughton & Blancato, P.L.L.C., Winston-Salem, NC; Stephen Mason Thomas, Patrick, Harper & Dixon, Hickory, NC; Frank J. Contrivo, Frank J. Contrivo, P.A., Asheville, NC, for appellees.
    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Dean Russell Carrico appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing this civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Carrico v. Village of Sugar Mountain, No. CA-99-168-1 (W.D.N.C. May 22, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.