Case ID: pa_487/html/0065-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

408 A.2d 1098
    ESTATE of Angelina DURSO, Deceased. Appeal of Edward J. DURSO.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Dec. 21, 1979.
    
      S. Regen Ginsburg, William R. Pomerantz, Lewis Kates, Philadelphia, for appellant.
    John J. Burfete, Jr., John T. Salvucci, Norristown, for appellee.
    Before EAGEN, C. J., and O’BRIEN, ROBERTS, NIX, MANDERINO, LARSEN and FLAHERTY, JJ.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

In this case, the trial court upheld the validity of the will of the decedent and rejected the contention of the appellant that it was the product of undue influence. After a reading of the record, we are completely satisfied that the court applied the correct tests (cf. In re Clark Estate, 461 Pa. 52, 334 A.2d 628 (1975)) in resolving the issue of undue influence, and that the evidence supports its finding and conclusions.

Decree affirmed. Each party to pay its own costs.

MANDERINO, J., did not participate in the decision of this case.