Case ID: f-appx_114/html/0880-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mark WILSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. David FERNANDEZ, Parole Agent I; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 03-56419.
    D.C. No. CV-03-02570-CBM.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 6, 2004.
    
    Decided Dec. 10, 2004.
    Mark Wilson, Westminster, CA, pro se.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Consuelo B. Marshall, District Judge, Presiding.
    Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Mark Wilson appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his application for leave to file this action without prepayment of the full filing fee. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, and we affirm. Tripati v. First Nat’l Bank & Trust, 821 F.2d 1368, 1369-70 (9th Cir.1987) (“A district court may deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis at the outset if it appears from the face of the proposed complaint that the action is frivolous or without merit.”).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.