Case ID: f-appx_148/html/0918-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David MAREK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 05-13058
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Nov. 3, 2005.
    Emily Wortman Lawyer, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    John C. Stoner, Social Security Administration, Mary Ann Sloan, Dennis R. Williams, Office of General Counsel, David A. Cornelius, Atlanta, GA, Susan Roark Waldron, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before: TJOFLAT, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

In this 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) social security disability case, the parties consented to proceeding before the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). After reviewing all the submissions of the parties, including a transcript of the proceedings before the administrative law judge and the exhibits in that proceeding, the magistrate judge entered an order affirming the commissioner’s decision to deny benefits.

David Marek, the claimant, appeals the final judgment entered as a result of the magistrate judge’s order. Marek raises the same claims on appeal that he raised before the magistrate judge. He contends that the ALJ improperly rejected the opinion of his treating physician and did not properly consider the combined effect of all of his impairments and his subjective symptoms.

The district court adequately and correctly addressed all of Marek’s arguments. After careful review of the briefs, the record, and the magistrate judge’s order, we affirm the denial of disability benefits for the reasons articulated in that order.

AFFIRMED.