Case ID: ad2d_191/html/0218-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Toth & Watanabe, Inc., Respondent, v New York State Liquor Authority, Appellant.
    [594 NYS2d 199]
   —Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Finger-hood, J.), entered June 29, 1992, which granted petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent’s denial of petitioner’s application for an on-premises liquor license, and directed respondent to issue the license, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent’s finding that petitioner’s lack of experience would prevent it from effectively running a bar is mere speculation that has no rational basis in the record (see, Matter of Sled Hill Cafe v Hostetter, 22 NY2d 607, 612-613), which demonstrates that three of the four principals operated their own business, that one of the principals ran a restaurant that sold liquor, and that petitioner hired a general manager with extensive liquor experience. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.