Case ID: f-appx_231/html/0237-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lafayette McKOY, a/k/a L.A., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-6015.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 21, 2007.
    Decided: June 27, 2007.
    
      Lafayette McKoy, Appellant Pro Se. Martin Joseph Clarke, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Lafayette McKoy appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McKoy, No. 1:99-er-00526WMN-8; 1:06-cv-01036-WMN (D.Md. Aug. 31, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.