Case ID: so2d_407/html/0566-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "TORBERT, Chief Justice. JONES, Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte: State of Alabama (In re: Earl A. BRYARS, Jr. v. STATE of Alabama).
    81-71.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Dec. 11, 1981.
    Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and J. Anthony McLain and James F. Hampton, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., for petitioner.
    Barry Hess and Virginia A. Johnston of Hess, Atchison & Horne, Mobile, for respondent.
   TORBERT, Chief Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

ALMON, SHORES, EMBRY and BEAT-TY, JJ., concur.

MADDOX, JONES and ADAMS, JJ., dissent.

FAULKNER, J., not sitting.

JONES, Justice

(dissenting).

I would grant the petition for writ of certiorari and limit the remand to the issue of sentencing. This case shows the extreme of what the dissent was trying to point out in Ritter v. State, 403 So.2d 154 (Ala.1981). In this case, where the defense is alibi, there is no possibility that the accused could have raised a lesser-included offense. He was there and did it, or was somewhere else and did not do it. How can he be entitled to a new trial because he was denied a lesser-included offense charge?

MADDOX and ADAMS, JJ., concur.