Case ID: ohio-st-3d_101/html/1448-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[Cite as 02/02/2004 Case Announcements, 2004-Ohio-394.]
    CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
    
      February 2, 2004
    
    MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS
    1987-1879.
    State v. Roe.
   Franklin App. No. 86AP-59. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for expedited stay of death sentence, appellant’s motion to supplement motion for expedited stay of death sentence, and appellant’s pro se motion for stay of death sentence,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to supplement be, and hereby is, granted.

F.E. Sweeney and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motions for stay of death sentence be, and hereby are, denied.