Case ID: sw2d_833/html/0893-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Esther S. LAUER, Plaintiff/Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. Norbert F. LAUER, Defendant/Respondent/Cross-Appellant.
    Nos. 60013, 60044.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Aug. 18, 1992.
    William James O’Herin, Florissant, for appellant.
    Mark Kruger, Randall B. Kahn, St. Louis, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Both Esther S. Lauer and Norbert F. Lauer, Jr., appeal from a decree which dissolved their marriage. The decree is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence and neither erroneously declares or applies the law. A written opinion would have no precedential value. The trial court’s decree is, therefore, affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). We have provided the parties with a memorandum, solely for their own use, explaining the reasons for our decision.