Case ID: so2d_358/html/1190-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

KENDALL MALL, INC., Appellant, v. CHURCHILL’S HAIR DESIGNER TO MEN AND WOMEN, INC., Appellee.
    No. 77-1889.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 30, 1978.
    Risken & Dishowitz, Hollywood, Savitt, Kotzen & France, North Miami Beach, for appellant.
    Steven M. Siegfried, of Schoninger & Siegfried, Miami, for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, NATHAN and HUBBART, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The only point raised in this appeal by the defendant-lessor from an adverse final money judgment in an action for breach of lease, is that the plaintiff-lessee failed to properly prove its damages. Having considered the contentions raised in the parties’ briefs in the light of the record on appeal and the transcript of the non-jury trial, we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated because the award of damages is supported by unrefuted competent substantial evidence.

Affirmed.