Case ID: f-appx_205/html/0151-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bernard Gregory LAMP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carole WALLACE, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 05-6675.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 22, 2006.
    Decided: Oct. 12, 2006.
    Bernard Gregory Lamp, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    
      Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Bernard Gregory Lamp appeals the magistrate judge’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Lamp’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Lamp v. Wallace, No. CA-04-317-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 23 and Apr. 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73.