Case ID: so2d_405/html/1368-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John Frank HASS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 80-1448.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Nov. 18, 1981.
    Maurice Graham of Brimmell & Graham, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joy B. Shearer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction. It appears, however, that appellant has been denied access to the factual portions of the presentence investigation report. This report is not part of the record on appeal and we therefore are unable to determine whether disclosure will have an impact on sentencing. We none-the-less are required to vacate the sentence and remand for compliance with Rule 3.713(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and for resentencing.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

BERANEK and HERSEY, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., (Associate Judge, retired), concur.