Case ID: so2d_638/html/1004-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Matthew BUCK and Alice Buck, his wife, Appellants, v. KENT SECURITY OF BROWARD, INC., a Florida corp., Appellee.
    No. 93-1584.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    June 15, 1994.
    Arnold R. Ginsberg of Perse, P.A. & Ginsberg, P.A., and Jerold Hart, P.A., Miami, for appellants.
    Brian R. Hersh of Law Offices of Brian R. Hersh, Miami, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellants leased storage space in a storage facility. When their goods were stolen appellants sued the security firm providing protection to the facility alleging they were third party beneficiaries of the contract between the facility and the firm. However, their own lease, which was attached to the complaint, negates the allegation that they could be third party beneficiaries, thus rendering the pleading objectionable and subject to dismissal. Harry Pepper & Associates, Inc. v. Lasseter, 247 So.2d 736 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). We also reject their contention that appellee could be liable as a volunteer.

Affirmed.

GUNTHER, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.