Case ID: f-appx_211/html/0213-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Vance Marcel GIBSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 06-7392.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 21, 2006.
    Decided: Jan. 4, 2007.
    Vance Marcel Gibson, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne P. Klauer, Office of the United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Vance Marcel Gibson appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss without prejudice Gibson’s motion for the return of seized property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gibson v. United States, No. 1:06-cv-00461-WLO (M.D.N.C. July 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.