Case ID: cma_19/html/0488-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Darden, Judge: Ferguson, Judge", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES, Appellee v RICHARD L. MAINARD, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant
    19 USCMA 488, 42 CMR 90
    No. 22,887
    June 5, 1970
    
      Colonel Daniel T. Ghent and Captain Monte Engler were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.
    
      Major Edwin P. Wasinger was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.
   Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

Evidence of Article 15 punishment was introduced after the court found the appellant guilty of robbery and assault with a deadly weapon committed on June 23, 1969. For the reasons stated in United States v Johnson, 19 USCMA 464, 42 CMR 66 (1970), this was error. The nature of the inadmissible evidence, the seriousness of the offenses charged, and a comparison of the punishment resulting with the maximum that could have been imposed convince us that the military judge was uninfluenced by the Article 15 punishment in sentencing Mainard. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the Court of Military Review.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Ferguson, Judge

(dissenting) :

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Johnson, 19 USCMA 464, 42 CMR 66 (1970).