Case ID: ad_263/html/0951-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William H. Silk, Respondent, v. The Bowery Savings Bank and James A. Stenhouse, Appellants, Valden Realty Corporation and Others, Defendants and Appellants Eighty-five Park Avenue Corporation and Conoco Corporation, Defendants.
    (Appeal No. 1) (Appeal No. 2),
   Order entered January 21, 1942, denying motion for a prior and separate trial of certain issues, unanimously reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.