Case ID: or-app_91/html/0170-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted April 28,
    fine vacated; order otherwise affirmed May 11, 1988
    MICHAEL SUMMERHALDER, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Respondent.
    
    (07-87-309; CA A45469)
    753 P2d 958
    Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.
    Jan Londahl, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Scott McAlister, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.
    Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary which found him guilty of a disciplinary rule and imposed a $100 fine. He argues that there is not sufficient evidence to support the finding of guilty. There is. He also contends that the fine is unlawful. It is. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).

Fine vacated; order otherwise affirmed.