Case ID: me_121/html/0582-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Granville F. Fish, alias Granville Fish, Pro Ami, vs. Walter E. Frye.
    Androscoggin County.
    Decided March 16, 1922.
    
      Tascus Atwood, for plaintiff.
    
      Pulsifer & Ludden, for defendant.
   This is an action for malicious prosecution, tried in the Superior Court for the County of' Androscoggin. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of eighty-seven dollars and fifty cents. The case is before the court on the defendant’s general motion.

After a very careful examination of the evidence, we are unable to conclude that the verdict is manifestly wrong. The entry will be. Motion overruled.