Case ID: mcgrath_1/html/0689-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CUMMINS vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Muskegon),
    No. 15847½.
   To set aside a non-suit which was entered because plaintiff, in a suit against a railway company for damages, occasioned by fire from defendant’s right of way, had failed to file or serve a bill of particulars, which had been demanded.

Order to show cause denied October 6, 1896.

Eelator contended that inasmuch as the declaration was ■special, defendant was not entitled to a bill of particulars. Citing

Everett vs. Circuit Judge, 39 M., 437 (332). Kehrig vs. Peters, 41 M., 475; Shadock vs. Plank Road Co., 79 M., 9; Van Vranken vs. Circuit Judge, 85 M., 140 (328).