Case ID: f-appx_516/html/0266-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Nicholas James QUEEN, Sr., Petitioner.
    No. 13-1070.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 20, 2013.
    Decided: April 1, 2013.
    Nicholas James Queen, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nicholas James Queen, Sr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied relief on the § 2255 motion by order entered on January 28, 2013. Accordingly, because the district court has decided Queen’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.