Case ID: ny-2d_62/html/0718-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marvin R. Neuwirth, as Executor of Kitty Neuwirth, Deceased, Respondent, v Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Greater New York, Blue Cross Association, et al., Appellants.
    Argued March 23, 1984;
    decided May 3, 1984
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      John Colucci, Ellen B. Levin, John L. Shurtleff and Jerrold I. Ehrlich for appellants.
    
      Louis S. Ederer and Marvin S. Cowan for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and, on defendants’ stipulation, judgment granted in favor of plaintiff.

The burden of proving that a claim falls within the exclusions of an insurance policy rests with the insurer (see International Paper Co. v Continental Cas. Co., 35 NY2d 322, 327; Prashker v United States Guar. Co., 1 NY2d 584, 594). Accordingly, the trial court properly ordered a new trial after it recognized that it had erroneously charged the jury that the insured’s representative had the burden of proof as to the application of the exclusions.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wacht-ler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed, etc.