Case ID: sw3d_16/html/0721-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Interest of M.M.H., a minor. In the Interest of C.E.C., a minor. In the Interest of J.C.C., a minor. In the Interest of I.M.H., a minor. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. C.V.H., Appellant.
    Nos. ED 76099-ED 76102.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    April 18, 2000.
    Robin Ransom Vannoy, Family Court of St. Louis County, St. Louis, for respondent.
    John R. Bird, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Rene’ E. Lusser, Lusser, Hughes & Lusser, St. Louis, guardian ad litem of juveniles.
    Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated appeal, mother appeals from the judgments of the trial court terminating her parental rights to her four minor children. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.1976).

Am opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).