Case ID: sw3d_295/html/0492-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

M & K CHEMICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC., Appellant, v. MALLINCKRODT, INC., and Tyco Healthcare Retail Group, Inc., Respondents.
    No. ED 92278.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    June 23, 2009.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 18, 2009.
    Application for Transfer Denied Nov. 17, 2009.
    David M. Duree, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Patrick T. McLaughlin, Brad K. Thoe-nen, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
    
      Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

M & K Chemical Engineering Consultants, Inc. (“M & K”) appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Mallinckrodt, Inc. and Tyco Healthcare Retail Group, Inc. (collectively, “Mallinckrodt”) and dismissing M & K’s petition for failure to state a claim.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).