Case ID: f-appx_569/html/0164-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Lamont SLATE, a/k/a Chicago, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 14-6273.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 24, 2014.
    Decided: April 29, 2014.
    William Lamont Slate, Appellant Pro Se.
    Peter Sinclair Duffey, Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

William Lamont Slate appeals a district court order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(B) (2012) motion and his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons of the district court. United States v. Slate, No. 4:97-cr-00041-RBS-2 (E.D.Va. Feb. 5, 2014). We deny Slate’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.