Case ID: mann-unrep-cas_1/html/0130-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Manning, C. J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 6900.
    Simon Seiss vs. David Seiss.
    Great latitude is allowed under our system of pleading, but it cannot be enlarged so as to permit a demand for the settlement of a commercial partnership, to be joined with one for the partition of immovable and movable property, in no manner connected with the partnership, or forming part of its effects.
    Appeal from the District Court for Avoyelles.
    
      Irion & Thorpe for Plaintiff. Edwards, Joffrion, and Barbin for Defendant Appellant.
    The suit is between brothers, in which claims and counter-claims were acrimoniously preferred, and resulted in a judgment below of $135.20 for plaintiff, which the court refused to disturb, saying, il faut iaver votre Unge sale en famille.
    
   Manning, C. J.,

delivered the opinion.