Case ID: cow_2/html/0456-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Curia.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hammond and Campbell against Mather and Mather.
    Two writs of fi. fa. may issue on the same judgment, into different counties at the same time.
    C. P. Kirkland, moved to set aside they?, fa. in this cause which had issued against the defendants’ property in the county of Otsego; and one ground which he took was, that a fi. fa. had previously issued in the same cause into the county of Herkimer, returnable at last October term, which had been levied on the defendants’ property, and before the sale under the first, this fi. fa. was issued into Otsego, returnable at this term ; so that there were two writs of fi. fa. running at the same time, in two different counties.
    
      A. Conkling, contra
    to show that this was correct practice, cited 2 Tidd, 912,1 Archb. 216, 2 Dunl. 771.
   Curia.

The books ff practice agree that this is regular.

Motion denied.