Case ID: sw3d_188/html/0001-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John KING, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 85958.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Dec. 27, 2005.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 21, 2006.
    Application for Transfer Denied May 2, 2006.
    John King # 504822, Charleston, MO, appellant acting pro se.
    Dora A. Fiehter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John King, movant, appeals from a judgment dismissing his second Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief as untimely filed. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).