Case ID: f-appx_585/html/0851-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mark FAREWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James HINGELEY, public defender; Elizabeth Murtagh, deputy public defender, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 14-6781.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 20, 2014.
    Decided: Nov. 24, 2014.
    
      Mark Farewell, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mark Farewell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Farewell v. Hingeley, No. 1:14-cv-00391-JCC-TCB (E.D.Va. May 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.