Case ID: or-app_123/html/0091-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

On respondent’s motion for reconsideration filed July 20, reconsideration allowed; former opinion (120 Or App 246, 851 P2d 635) withdrawn;
    affirmed September 1, 1993
    STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DANIEL GREG VAN DAAM, aka Daniel Gregg Homenyk, aka Daniel Greg Van Dam, Appellant.
    
    (91CR-1656; CA A72465)
    858 P2d 918
    Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, for motion.
    No appearance contra.
    
    Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and Edmonds, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

We allow the state’s motion for reconsideration of our decision in which we affirmed defendant’s conviction for murder but remanded for resentencing. 120 Or App 246, 851 P2d 635 (1993).

Defendant was charged by a 10-count indictment with, inter alia, murder. ORS 163.115. Pursuant to a plea agreement, he pled guilty to a single charge of murder in return for dismissal of all the remaining charges. On appeal, he challenged both the life sentence and 25-year prison term imposed under ORS 163.115.

Defendant’s sentence “resulted from” the agreement and we therefore may not review his claim of error. ORS 138.222(2)(d); State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993); State v. Johnston, 120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1156 (1993). We erred in remanding defendant’s conviction for resentencing.

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion withdrawn; affirmed.