Case ID: f-appx_698/html/0381-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alexander C. BAKER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clair MARLO, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-56893
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted September 26, 2017 
    
    FILED OCTOBER 5, 2017
    Alexander C. Baker, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
    Michael Anthony Dinardo, Kelly, Lowry & Kelley, LLP, Woodland Hills, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Clair Mario appeals from the district court’s judgment in a copyright action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. New-Gen, LLC v. Safe Cig, LLC, 840 F.3d 606, 616 (9th Cir. 2016) (grant of motion to enter default judgment); Brandt v. Am. Bankers Ins. Co. of Fla., 663 F.3d 1108, 1110 (9th Cir. 2011) (denial of motion to set aside entry of default and denial of motion to set aside default judgment). We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s orders entered on August 8, 2016, September 23, 2016, and December 1, 2016.

Appellee’s motion to take judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 10) is denied as unnecessary.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.