Case ID: so2d_266/html/0446-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SUMMERS, J., BARHAM, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

262 La. 1166
    Alice Evelyn TITARD et al. v. LUMBERMEN’S MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY.
    No. 52773.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 28, 1972.
   In re: Alice Evelyn Titard and her husband, Robert N. Batton, Sr. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Landry, 264 So.2d 382.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.

SUMMERS, J.,

I am of the opinion the writ should be granted solely for the reason that the Court of Appeal failed to find facts upon which its opinion is based. See Dick v. Phillips, 253 La. 366, 218 So.2d 299 (1969). In my view, based upon the reasons assigned by the trial court, the judgment complained of is correct.

BARHAM, J.,

concurs in the granting of the writ but would by per curiam, and without docketing, remand to the Court of Appeal for written reasons for its judgment.