Case ID: ga-app_29/html/0135-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodwokth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

13231.
    Bray v. Porterfield & Brown.
    Decided October 3, 1922.
    Complaint; from city court of Lexington-—-Judge Joel Cloud. December 22, 1921.
    
      W. W. Armistead, Hamilton McWhorter Jr., for plaintiff in error.
    
      Gordon & Gordon, contra.
   Bloodwokth, J.

As the motion for a new trial in this ease contains only the usual general grounds, the only question for determination by this court is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. There is some evidence to support the finding of the jury, and a verdict supported by any evidence and approved by the trial judge cannot be set aside by this court because of alleged insufficiency of evidence.” Townsend v. State, 26 Ga. App. 82 (105 S. E. 377).

Judgment affirmed.

.Broyles, O. J., and Luhe, J., concur.