Case ID: sw3d_517/html/0677-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jason D. BIRDNO, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 103610
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    Filed: May 9, 2017
    Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
    Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Attorney General, for Respondent.
    Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Lisa Van Amburg, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jason Birdno appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We find no clear error in the motion court’s findings and conclusions. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).