Case ID: nys_97/html/1143-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PEARSALL v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Diviion, Fourth Department.
    March 28, 1906.)
    letion by David A. Pearsall against the New fork Central & Hudson River Railroad Com->any.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order afirmed, with costs.

KRUSE, J.,

dissents, upon the ground that ividence of the meaning and application of the ule relating to junctions was improperly ex-luded.