Case ID: ga_86/html/0359-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bleckley, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Clay v. Clay et al.
    
    Injunction and receiver. Lis pendens.
    
    December 23, 1890.
    [From Bibb superior court. Before Judge Miller, at chambers, June 10, 1890.
    Hardeman & Nottingham, for plaintiff.
    R. 'W. Patterson, for defendants.
   Bleckley, C. J.

There was no abuse of discretion in denying an interlocutory injunction and receiver. Under the doctrine of lis pendens the fruits of the litigation, if any, as to the corpus of the real estate will be secure]; and as to income, choses in action, etc., the solvency of one of the defendants affords reasonable security against loss. Judgment affirmed.