Case ID: nev_90/html/0418-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RICHARD M. GARFINKLE, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent.
    No. 7612
    December 20, 1974
    529 P.2d 794
    
      Stanley H. Brown and Harold G. Albright, of Reno, for Appellant.
    
      Robert List, Attorney General, Carson City; Robert E. Rose, District Attorney, and Michael E. Malloy, Deputy District Attorney, Washoe County, for Respondent.
   OPINION

Per Curiam:

In this appeal from an order denying a pretrial petition for habeas corpus, we believe evidence presented to the grand jury justified its indictment of appellant. At this juncture we need not and do not decide whether such evidence would support a conviction. Cf. McDonald v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 326, 512 P.2d 774 (1973); Maskaly v. State, 85 Nev. 111, 450 P.2d 790 (1969).

Other contentions raised by appellant have previously been considered and rejected. See Cairns v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 113, 508 P.2d 1015 (1973); Mears v. State, 83 Nev. 3, 422 P.2d 230 (1967); and, cf. Schmitt v. State, 88 Nev. 320, 497 P.2d 891 (1972).

The order denying habeas relief is affirmed.