Case ID: f-appx_691/html/0378-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alvaro SANCHEZ-ORTEGA, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 12-73829
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Filed May 19, 2017
    Submitted May 19, 2017  Pasadena, California
    Charles Lee Gillig, Attorney, CASA Cornelia Law Center, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner
    Dana Michelle Camilleri, Tracey McDonald, OIL, Anthony ‘ Cardozo Payne, Senior Litigation Counsel, Colette Jabes Winston, Esquire, Attorney, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent
    Before: PREGERSON, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       Oral argument was vacated. The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for de-cisión without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   ORDER

The case is submitted as of the date of this order.

Respondent’s motion to remand is granted. This case is remanded to the Board of Immigration Appeals for further consideration in light of Bringas-Rodriguez v. Sessions, 850 F.3d 1051 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc).

Costs on appeal are awarded to petitioner. This order shall serve as the mandate of the court. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.