Case ID: ohio-st-3d_74/html/0044-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cleveland Bar Association v. Sweeney.
    [Cite as Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Sweeney (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 44.]
    (No. 95-1198
    Submitted September 13, 1995
    Decided November 22, 1995.)
    
      
      Ulmer & Berne and Kenneth A. Bravo; Dworken & Bernstein Co., L.P.A., and Alec Berezin, for relator.
    
      Charles W. Kettlewell, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is therefore suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio, and his reinstatement is conditioned upon proof of complete reimbursement to the Clients’ Security Fund. Moreover, we add the further condition that, prior to any application for reinstatement, respondent shall also make full restitution to those clients whose claims have not been paid by the Clients’ Security Fund, -with interest at the legal judgment rate. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.