Case ID: so3d_237/html/1049-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kahena Kristine GALLERANI, Appellant, v. Cristiano PIQUET, Appellee.
    No. 3D16-2932
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed November 29, 2017 Rehearing Denied December 29, 2017
    Jason B. Giller, P.A., and Tricia Neimand ; Keith D. Silverstein, for appellant.
    Michael Lascelle, P.A., and Jeffrey Greenhaus, for appellee.
    Before SALTER, EMAS, and LOGUE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

"Valid prenuptial agreements regarding post-dissolution support are contracts." Lashkajani v. Lashkajani, 911 So.2d 1154, 1158 (Fla. 2005). Because courts have recently enforced similar provisions, see Weymouth v. Weymouth, 87 So.3d 30, 32 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), we reverse the trial judge's determination that the provision of the prenuptial agreement at issue is void against Florida's public policy, hold that Ms. Gallerani has met the conditions of that provision, and remand for entry of a revised final judgment of dissolution of marriage ratifying, incorporating, and enforcing the prenuptial agreement including the provision at issue.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.