Case ID: conn-app_5/html/0633-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

City of Hartford v. Stanley V. Tucker et al.
    (3285)
    Hull, Daly and Bieluch, Js.
    Argued November 11
    decision released December 24, 1985
    
      Stanley V. Tucker, pro se, the appellant (named defendant).
    
      Frederick D. Augenstern, for the appellees (third party defendants Frances Gionfriddo et al.).
    
      Michael G. Durham, for the appellee (third party defendant Western Surety Co.).
    
      
      James F. Kane, for the appellees (third party defendants Frank Smith et al.).
    
      Larry P. Levesque, for the appellee (plaintiff).
   Per Curiam.

The named defendant has appealed the dismissal of his third party complaints against the receivers of rents and their respective sureties as a result of the defendant’s failure to obtain the requisite prior permission of the court.

We carefully reviewed the named defendant’s claims in these matters and find them to be without merit. See Tucker v. American Ins. Co., 3 Conn. App. 397, 399, 488 A.2d 1278 (1985).

There is no error. 
      
       There are four cases involved in this appeal which present the same issues: Hartford Superior Court docket numbers 287787, 287788, 287789 and 287790.