Case ID: f-appx_297/html/0259-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Eugene REED, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-7710.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 15, 2008.
    Decided: Oct. 28, 2008.
    Larry Eugene Reed, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Smythers, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
    Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Larry Eugene Reed appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp.2008) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Reed, No. 4:96-cr-00022-RAJ-3 (E.D. Va. July 9 & Aug. 4, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED