Case ID: pa_334/html/0210-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Drew,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Drasin v. Philadelphia School District et al., Appellants.
    Argued January 26, 1939.
    Before Kephart, C. J., Schaefer, Maxey, Drew, Linn, Stern and Barnes, JJ.
    
      Robert von Mosehzisker and Franklin 8. Edmonds, for appellants.
    
      
      Wesley Hurst Caldwell, with him Abraham Koppel-man, for appellee.
    
      Wm. A. Schnader, with him Louis F. Floge and Bernard C. Segal, for United Committee, under Rule 61.
    March 30, 1939:
   Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

The facts in this case raise the identical questions of law as those presented in the case of Smith v. Philadelphia School District, 334 Pa. 197. For the reasons therein stated, the School District was entitled to reduce appellee’s salary in the instant case by the resolution of January 11, 1938. Therefore, appellants should be directed to enter into a contract in the manner and form prescribed by the Tenure Act in the sum of $2,200. The record is remitted to the court below for the purpose of entering a judgment in conformity herewith.

Judgment, as modified, affirmed; costs to be paid by appellants.