Case ID: sw3d_502/html/0767-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Fletcher PRYOR, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 103905
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    FILED: November 22, 2016
    Amanda P. Faerber, St. Louis, Missouri, for Movant/Appellant.
    Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, Missouri, for Respondent.
    Before Angela T. Quigless, 'P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Fletcher prior appeals from the circuit court’s judgment denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have'reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose Would' be served by a written' opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).