Case ID: so2d_568/html/1011-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael MAGULA and Steve Magula, Appellants, v. Robert L. GOSSETT and Gossett, McDonald, Gossett & Crawford, P.A., Appellees.
    No. 89-1546.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Oct. 31, 1990.
    Steve Maguía, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.
    Ronald P. Gossett of Gossett, McDonald, Gossett & Crawford, P.A., Hollywood, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal a judgment on the pleadings entered in favor of defendants in a legal malpractice action. We reverse.

After reviewing the complaint and answer, we are of the opinion that, inarticulate though it may be in some places, the complaint did state a cause of action and factual questions remain. Therefore, judgment on the pleadings was inappropriate in this instance. McAbee v. Edwards, 340 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); See also General GMC Truck Sales And Serv. v. Simm, 430 So.2d 998 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Riccio v. Stein, 559 So.2d 1207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) rev dismissed, 567 So.2d 436 (Fla.1990).

REVERSED.

DELL, WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.