Case ID: so2d_761/html/0317-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bryan PERRY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. SC97119.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    June 22, 2000.
    
      James B. Gibson, Public Defender and Noel A. Pelella, Assistant Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, FL, for Petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Kellie A. Nielan, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, FL, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review the decision in Perry v. State, 744 So.2d 1199 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), in which the Fifth District Court of Appeal cited as controlling authority its opinion in Maddox v. State, 708 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), approved in part, disapproved in part, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981). We quash the decision below and remand for the Fifth District to consider this case in light of our opinion in Maddox.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.