Case ID: a3d_118/html/1106-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David KNELLER, Petitioner v. Marsha C. STEWART, Respondent.
    No. 63 MM 2015.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    July 8, 2015.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2015, as Petitioner may pursue redress in a civil action, mandamus relief is not available. See Relosky v. Sacco, 514 Pa. 339, 523 A.2d 1112 (1987) (holding that a petitioner may not obtain mandamus relief unless he establishes the absence of another adequate remedy). As such, the Petition for Review in the Nature of Mandamus is DENIED, and the Application to Disqualify Counsel is DISMISSED as moot.