Case ID: ad2d_1/html/0893-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Vincent Codella, Respondent, v. William Murray, Doing Business as Murray Auto Sales, Defendant, and Murray Auto Sales, Inc., Appellant.
   — Appeal from so much of an interlocutory judgment as (1) reforms a written contract entered into with respondent, as an employee, so as to have the contract recite that appellant, and not the defendant, was the contracting employer; (2) directs appellant to account to respondent for profits to which he is entitled under said agreement; and (3) refers the matter of taking and stating the account to a referee. Interlocutory judgment, insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.