Case ID: misc_8/html/0680-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NEW YORK COMMON PLEAS — GENERAL TERM,
    MAY, 1894.
    John Allen, Respondent, v. Francis A. Clark, Appellant.
    Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the City Court, affirming a judgment -entered upon the report of a referee.
    
      /S'. Lobenthal, for appellant.
    
      Parley <& Prendergast, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

It is clear that we cannot review the evidence in order to determine whether there is a preponderance on the one side or the other. The General Term of the City Court has passed upon that, and its decision is final. The claim that the verdict is against the preponderance of evidence admits that there is some evidence to support the verdict. There is no other question raised in the points of the appellant, and the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Bookstaver, Bischoff and Pryor, J’J.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.