Case ID: ohio-cc_3/html/0433-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

W. H. Janes v. Jacob Hoehn.
    
      Misconduct of Jury— What evidence inadmissible■ to show.
    
    The jury agreed to each assess the amount of damages, the' added total to be divided by twelve, and agreed to and did return the quotient as their verdict. This was proved only by the affidavits of jurors.
    
      Reid: The evidence was inadmissible to prove such misconduct. 2 Ohio St. 54.
    
      O. E. Pennewell, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Robinson & White, for defendant in error.