Case ID: ohio-st-3d_15/html/0125-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shaw.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Shaw (1984), 15 Ohio St. 3d 125.]
    (D.D. No. 84-37
    December 31, 1984.)
    
      
      Mr. Angelo J. Gagliardo, disciplinary counsel, and Mr. Carl J. Corletzi, for relator.
    
      Mr. Richard Cartwright, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

After a careful review of the evidence, this court finds that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(1), (3), (4) and (6), DR 7-101 (A)(3), and DR 9-102(A) and (B) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. Accordingly, we concur in the recommendation of the board of commissioners.

Therefore, it is the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.