Case ID: sw3d_32/html/0618-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Steven R. GRANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 77280.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Oct. 17, 2000.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 21, 2000.
    Application for Transfer Denied Dec. 27, 2000.
    Mary S. Choi, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven R. Grant appeals from a judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. The motion court’s judgment is based on findings and conclusions that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).