Case ID: mcgrath_1/html/0501-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MASSMAN ET AL. vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Sanilac),
    No. 16095.
   To vacate an order denying defendants’ motion to strike an amended declaration from the files, in an action against a saloon-keeper and his bondsmen, under 3 How. Stat., Sec. 2283, E. 3.

Denied, with costs, May 1, 1897.

In the original declaration plaintiff (the widow) declared as administratrix. The amended declaration named plaintiff personally and counted upon injuries to her means of support.

It seems that defendants’ counsel, . in consideration of a continuance, stipulated that a “ new declaration” might be’filed.