Case ID: sw_246/html/0379-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "LATTIMORE, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SAINZ v. STATE.
    (No. 7382.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Dec. 20, 1922.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 17, 1923.)
    Criminal law <©=>1094 — In absence of statement of facts, bill of exceptions, or apparent error, judgment will be affirmed.
    On appeal, where no statement of facts or bill of exception are before the court, and no error appears of record, affirmance will be ordered.
    Appeal from District Court, Bexar County; S. G. Tayloe, Judge.
    Ventura Sainz was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    W. C. Linden, of San Antonio, for appellant.
    R. G. Storey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   LATTIMORE, J.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Bexar county of burglary, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment in two counts charges burglary, one count alleging a nighttime and the other a daytime burglary, and each appear to be framed in accordance with our statute. The charge of the court submits the law of burglary, and, finding no error in the record, an affirmance is ordered. 
      «g^coFor other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes