Case ID: sw2d_838/html/0521-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri Respondent, v. Raymond Joe SUTTON, Appellant.
    No. 60932.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Oct. 20, 1992.
    Cynthia M. Howlett, Shaw, Howlett & Knappenberger, Clayton, for appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert Alan Kelly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals following his conviction by a jury of unlawful use of a weapon, § 571.030.1(4). We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).