Case ID: ohio-st-3d_6/html/0010-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n     Clifford F. Brown, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ohio State Bar Association v. Cantagallo.
    [Cite as Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Cantagallo (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 10.]
    (D.D. No. 83-3
    Decided July 13, 1983.)
    
      
      Mr. John R. Welch, Mr. Albert L. Bell, Mr. Frank P. Anzellotti, Jr., and Mr. Jack C. Harris, for relator.
    
      Mr. Robert R. Disbro and Mr. Robert J. Vecchio, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

After a careful examination and review of the record in this cause, this court concurs with the findings and conclusions of the board that respondent violated DR 9-102 (B)(1), (3), and (4).

It is the judgment of this court that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., dissent.

Clifford F. Brown, J.,

dissenting. In my view, under all the circumstances in this case, a public reprimand of the respondent is a sufficient sanction.

J. P. Celebrezze, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.