Case ID: so3d_260/html/0578-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "LAGOA, Associate Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph SMITH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D18-0991
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed January 23, 2019
    Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Shannon Hemmendinger, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
    Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, and Gabrielle Raemy Charest-Turken, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before EMAS, C.J., and HENDON, J., and LAGOA, Associate Judge.
    ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
   LAGOA, Associate Judge.

Joseph Smith ("Smith") appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of a controlled substance, possession of drug paraphernalia, and resisting an officer without violence, arguing that his trial was fundamentally flawed due to the trial court's failure to instruct the jury as to reasonable doubt. As the State correctly concedes, the trial court's failure to instruct the jury as to Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Criminal) 3.7 Plea of Not Guilty; Reasonable Doubt, and Burden of Proof, or any similar instruction, constituted fundamental error. See Cavagnaro v. State, 117 So.3d 1111, 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (finding fundamental error where the jury charge did not include Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Criminal) 3.7 or any similar instruction); see also Curry v. State, 169 So.3d 1258, 1258 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) ; Burnette v. State, 103 So.3d 1059 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). Accordingly, we reverse Smith's conviction and remand for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.