Case ID: tex_121/html/0195-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Helen C. Johnson et al. v. Arthur Star.
    Application No. 18,589.
    Decided March 23, 1932.
    (47 S. W., 2d Series, 608.)
    
      C. Huggins and Webb & Webb, of Sherman, and Fred J. Dudley, of Dallas, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      William Endress, Jr., and Renfro, Ledbetter & McCombs, all of Dallas, for defendants in error.
   PER CURIAM.

The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth District in this case is in conflict with that of the Court of Civil Appeals for the Sixth District in the case of Johnson v. Chapman Milling Co., 37 S. W. (2d) 776.. We are convinced, however, that the opinion of the first named court in the instant case is correct, and that the questions at issue have been definitely settled by this court in the cases of Patty-Joiner v. Cummins, 93 Texas, 598, 57 S. W., 566, and Haijek v. Luck, 96 Texas, 517, 74 S. W., 305. We accordingly refuse the application for writ of error.