Case ID: so2d_719/html/0991-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary C. EAGER, Appellant, v. George W. EAGER, Sr., Appellee.
    No. 98-374.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 28, 1998.
    Hershoff, Lupino, DeFoor & Gregg and Jay A. Hershoff, Tavernier; Maurice Jay Kutner and Mary A. Swayze, Miami, for appellant.
    Gus H. Crowell, Tavernier, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and SHEVIN and SORONDO, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

On this appeal from orders on attorney’s fees entered by the trial court after Eager v. Eager, 696 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), we reject the contentions of attorney Kutner and affirm the award of fees to him, in accordance with the partial reversal in that decision. However, we reverse the dismissal of attorney Hershoff s claim for supplemental services and remand for an evidentiary hearing on that issue.