Case ID: misc_34/html/0518-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bischoff, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jacob Levy, Respondent, v. The Metropolitan Street Railway Co., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term,
    April, 1901.)
    Appellate Term — Interlocutory judgment of City Court when not reviewable— Code C. 3?., § 3189.
    An appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the Trial or Special Term of the City Court of New York lies to its General Term, but no further appeal lies to the Appellate Term, where final judgment has not been directed by the said judgment.
    Levy v. Metropolitan St. R. Co., 34 Misc. Rep. 220, appeal dismissed.
    Appeal from affirmance by General Term of the City Court of the city of Hew York of an interlocutory judgment sustaining a demurrer to certain separate defenses.
    Henry Melville, for appellant.
    Jacob Friedman, for respondent.
   Bischoff, P. J.

An appeal from an interlocutory judgment lies to the General Term (Code, § 3189), but not to the Supreme Court from the determination of the General Term upon that appeal, where final judgment is not directed. Code, § 3191, subd. 1; Monroe-Miller Co. v. Stokes, 9 Misc. Rep. 170; Fuller v. Tuska, 43 N. Y. St. Repr. 523.

Levehtbitt and Clabice, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed, with costs.