Case ID: f-appx_329/html/0163-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Juan ARELLANO-OCHOA, Defendant — Appellant.
    No. 06-30052.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 14, 2009.
    
    Filed July 22, 2009.
    Lori Harper Suek, Esq., USBI-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Evangelo Arvanetes, Esq., FDMT-Fed-eral Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Juan Arellano-Ochoa appeals from the 87-month sentence imposed following his jury-trial conviction for distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Arellano-Ochoa contends that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to adequately consider all of the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and that his sentence is excessive in light of his mitigating circumstances. The district court did not procedurally err and Arellano-Ochoa’s sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Stoterau, 524 F.3d 988, 999-1002 (9th Cir.2008).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.