Case ID: nys_67/html/1149-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED ELECTRIC LIGHT & POWER CO., Respondent, v. GRAND CENTRAL REAL-ESTATE & INVESTMENT CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    December 31, 1900.)
    Action by the United Electric Light & Power Company against Grand Central Real-Estate & Investment Company. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Foster & Speir, for appellant.
    G. W. Simpson, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

In this case, although the contract was made in the names of Tiernan & Somers, it was so made at the request of and for the benefit of the defendant, in order to enable it to get the increased discount. Credit was not given to Tiernan & Somers, but was given to the defendant. The earlier bills appear to have been paid by the defendant. This is not a case of one giving credit to a disclosed principal. Judgment affirmed, with costs.