Case ID: so2d_770/html/0277-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RBES, L.C., et al., Petitioners, v. Armando C. SANTANA, Respondent.
    No. 3D00-2814.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 1, 2000.
    Vila, Padrón & Carrillo, and Pedro R. Carrillo, Coral Gables, for appellants.
    Armando C. Santana, in proper person.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and SHEVIN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Rodriguez-Betancourt & Elso, P.A., has filed this petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash a trial court order dated September 7, 2000, granting a motion to inspect a computer belonging to petitioner, which is a non-party to the litigation. In his response, Armando C. Santana, respondent, asserts that this petition may be rendered moot as petitioner is being served with a subpoena duces tecum, the proper mechanism for obtaining discovery from non-parties. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.351. We interpret this an admission that the petition is well-taken and grant the petition, quashing the order of the trial court.