Case ID: okla_26/html/0200-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "TURNER, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BAKER v. PHELPS.
    No. 1335.
    Opinion Filed May 10, 1910.
    (109 Pac. 72.)
    APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal—Failure to File Briefs. The Syllabus in Leavitt et al. v. Commercial National Bank, infra, 109 Pac. 71, is made the syllabus in this case.
    (Syllabus by the Court.)
    
      Error from Wagoner County Court; W. T. Drake, Judge.
    
    Action between Maggie Baker and J. W. Phelps. From the judgment, Baker brings error;
    Dismissed.
    
      J. J. Hughes, for plaintiff: in error.
    
      B. J. Beavers, for defendant in error.
   TURNER, J.

On January 11, 1910) plaintiff in error filed in this court petition in error with case-made thereto attached, whereupon summons issued. On April 15, 1910, defendant in error moved this court to dismiss said appeal, on the ground that plaintiff in error had failed to'comply with rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi), requiring him to file his brief with the clerk.of this court within 40 days after filing said petition in error. Service of said motion was duly had pursuant to rule 5, which reads: • ■ ...

“When a motion is filed with the clerk it must show service upon the opposite, party as to the time it will- be filed, who shall have 10 days thereafter in which to answer the same.”

No response has been filed to said motion,” and as said brief is not yet filed, and is now some two months overdue, said motion is sustained and the appeal is dismissed.

All the Justices concur.