Case ID: njl_84/html/0762-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LONG DOCK COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THEODORE STRONG ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
    Argued March 17, 1913
    Decided April 24, 1913.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 53 Vroom 21.
    For the plaintiff in error, Collins & Corbin.
    
    For the defendants in error, Edmund Wilson, attorney-general, John Franklin Fort and John R. Hardin.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Garrison in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Oi-iiee Justice, Swayze, Tbenohard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Bogert, Congdon, White, Hbppenheimer, Terhune, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.