Case ID: f-appx_624/html/0250-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Daniel ESCOBAR-ROJAS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-40546
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Dec. 15, 2015.
    Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public
    Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendanb-Appel-lant.
    Before JONES, SOUTHWTCK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Appealing the- judgment in a criminal case, Daniel Escobar-Rojas raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 562-63 (5th Cir.2013) (en banc), in which we held that the generic, contemporary definition of “sexual abuse of a minor” does not require that the age of consent be below 17 years old. The motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R, 47.5.4.