Case ID: so2d_623/html/1191-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alicia BAILEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 81483.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Sept. 16, 1993.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Carol M. Dittmar, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We review Bailey v. State, 621 So.2d 680 (Fla. 2d DCA1993), based on a certified question. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We answered the question in Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993). The decision of the district court of appeal with respect to petitioner’s sentencing is accordingly quashed and the case remanded for proceedings consistent with our opinion in Tripp.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.