Case ID: f3d_83/html/1040-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Victor DAY, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA; Pill Soon Song, Appellees.
    No. 95-4073NE.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted May 13, 1996.
    Decided May 22, 1996.
    
      James C. ZalewsM, argued, Lincoln, NÉ, for appellant.
    David R. Buntain, argued, Lincoln, NE (John C. Wiltse, on the brief), for appellee.
    Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Victor Day appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in Day’s civil rights action. Day v. Board of Regents, 911 F.Supp. 1228 (D.Neb.1995). Day contends the University of Nebraska’s decision to pay him less than other professors in his department was age-based and deprived him of an array of constitutional rights. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude Day is not entitled to relief. Because the controlling law is clear, our review satisfies us that an opinion would have no precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.