Case ID: ala_200/html/0697-09.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(76 South. 995)
    COLE v. LAW et al.
    (4 Div. 683.)
    (Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Nov. 25, 1917.)
    Appeal from Chancery Court, Coffee County; O. S. Lewis, Chancellor. Action between Mary Cole and Malinda Law and others. From a decision in favor of the latter, the former appeals.
    Appeal dismissed.
    J. A. Carnley, of Enterprise, for appellant.
    W. L. Parks, of Andalusia, C. W. Simmons, of Enterprise, Claude Riley, of Elba,' and M. S. Carmichael, of Montgomery, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed affidavit of inability to give security for costs, and that she is a married woman, the widow of Nathan Cole; but the court is of the opinion that Acts 1915, p. 715, amending section 2879, Code 1907, does not apply to this appeal. It is therefore ordered that, unless appellants give security for costs within 60 days from May 10, 1917, the appeal be dismissed. Appellants failing to give security as required,- the appeal is dismissed.