Case ID: ind_6/html/0493-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Slaughter v. Kimble.
    
      Saturday, June 16.
    APPEAL from the Franklin Court of Common Pleas.
    
      J. D. Howland, for the appellant.
    
      J. Hyman, for the appellee.
   Per Curiam.

This case turns upon the weight of evidence, as to whether a sale of a lot of wheat had taken place. It depended upon what really were the terms of a parol agreement, subsequent notice, reasonable time, &c.

We can not say the finding upon the-evidence was clearly wrong.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.