Case ID: f-appx_471/html/0212-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Darius Dywane MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN, Defendant-Appellee, and Value Options; Riverside Behavioral Health Center, Defendants.
    No. 12-1150.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 19, 2012.
    Decided: April 25, 2012.
    
      Darius Dywane Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Edward Warmbier, Kaufman & Candes, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Darius Mitchell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mitchell v. Northrop Grumman, No. 4:11-cv-00118-RAJ-DEM (E.D.Va. Jan. 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.