Case ID: njl_40/html/0380-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN MATTER OF DRAINAGE ALONG THE PEQUEST RIVER.
    In error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiffs in error, J. Vanatta.
    
    For the defendants in error, E. C. Harris.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court. 10 Vroom 197.

For affirmance—The Chancelloe, Depue, Knapp, Yan. Syckel, Clement, Dodd, Geeen, Lilly, Wales. 9.

For reversal—None.