Case ID: so2d_348/html/1160-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Donald L. SCOTT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 76-45.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 7, 1976.
    William N. Hutchinson, Jr., Miami, for appellant.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Margarita Esquiroz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
    Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAV-ERFIELD, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant was found guilty by a jury of robbery and the use of a firearm in a criminal offense. On this appeal, he urges error upon several rulings of the trial judge during the trial. We find that the proof of appellant’s guilt was clear and evident and that the rulings upon which error is assigned could not have deprived defendant of a fair trial. Affirmed. See Section 924.33, Florida Statutes (1975).