Case ID: sw3d_477/html/0709-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Artez UPCHURCH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 102617
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    FILED: December 15, 2015
    Matthew W. Huckeby, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for Appellant.
    
      Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent.
    Before Lisa Van Amburg, C.J., Sherri B, Sullivan, P.J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Artez Upchurch appeals from the judgment of the circuit court denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).