Case ID: f_287/html/0720-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "' PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FOLKES et al. v. MITCHELL.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    December 18, 1922.)
    No. 91.
    In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
    Action at law by Lilly V. Eolkes and another against William Mitchell. Judgment for defendant (287 Fed. 719), and plaintiffs bring error.
    Affirmed.
    O. D. Batchelor, of New York City, for plaintiffs in error.
    Bandler & Haas, of New York City (John E. Collins, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant in error.
    Before HOUGH, MANTON, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.
   ' PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.