Case ID: johns_3/html/0144-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

M‘Intyre against Rowan.
    A ca. sa. on fendant* had" been taken, was allowed to be amended, S-Msmcfau.se
    A JUDGMENT was entered - up in this cause on default, and a ca. sa. issued to the sheriff of Washington county, on which the defendant was taken, and remained ..... . , m prison. • The venue was laid m the county or Albany, anc* the attorney, by mistake, omitted to insert the testatum clause in the ca. sa. Crary, for the plaintiff, now moved to amend the capias ad satisfaciendum, by inserting the testatum clause.
   Per Curiam.

Amendments of this nature are always in the discretion of the court- Take your rule.

Rule granted.