Case ID: f-appx_670/html/0584-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Shirley Venoya REMMERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 15-16471
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted October 25, 2016 
    
    Filed November 7, 2016
    Shirley Venoya Remmert, Pro Se
    Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and • CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. ' See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Shirley Venoya Remmert appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying her leave to file a complaint under a vexatious litigant order. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the application of a vexatious litigant order. Moy v. United States, 906 F.2d 467, 469 (9th Cir. 1990). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Remmert leave to file a complaint against defendants because Remmert attempted to file the complaint in violation of a vexatious litigant ordered entered against her. See id.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.