Case ID: nj-eq_102/html/0333-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Oueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edward L. Katzenbach, attorney-general, respondent, v. Armstrong Cork Company, appellant.
    [Decided February 6th, 1928.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.
    
      Mr. Henry J. Gaede, for the respondent.
    
      Messrs. Starr, Summerill & Lloyd, for the appellant.
   Pee Oueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in 99 N. J. Eq. 82.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenohaed, Pakkee, Mintuen, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Deak, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.