Case ID: f-appx_40/html/0780-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Jamal A. AZEEZ, Petitioner.
    No. 02-6642.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted June 19, 2002.
    Decided July 10, 2002.
    Jamal Azeez, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Jamal A. Azeez petitions this court for a writ of mandamus to compel the district court to rule on his pending petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). The granting of a writ of mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used in extraordinary circumstances. In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Azeez’s petition does not set forth exceptional circumstances as would warrant the issuance of a writ of mandamus at this time. We note, however, that no significant action has been taken in the district court for over seven months.

Accordingly, we deny Azeez’s mandamus petition without prejudice to his refiling it should the district court fail to act within a reasonable time. We grant Azeez’s application to proceed on appeal in forma pau-peris and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.