Case ID: so2d_611/html/0537-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NEWMAN-GREENSTEIN REAL ESTATE CO., INC., and Leo-Jaeson Corporation, etc., Appellants, v. ARDC CORPORATION, f/k/a Arvida Corporation, Appellee.
    Nos. 92-998, 92-917.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 24, 1992.
    On Motion for Rehearing Feb. 9, 1993.
    Howard A. Rose, Young, Franklin & Ber-man, P.A. and Andrew S. Berman, North Miami Beach, for appellants.
    Nancy Little Hoffman, Bunnell, Woulfe & Keller, P.A., and George E. Bunnell, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellee.,
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Harding Realty, Inc. v. Turnberry Towers Corp., 436 So.2d 983 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

On Motion for Rehearing

As the July 14, 1986 letter expressly states that the July 1 outline does not include every detail, and as the June 23 letter also states that any agreement was subject to approval of appellee’s board of directors, we conclude that the transaction falls within the scope of Restatement (Second) of Agency § 445, comment d & illus. 5 (1958), and summary judgment was properly entered. We have carefully considered appellants’ argument to the contrary, but are not persuaded thereby. Rehearing denied.