Case ID: sw2d_696/html/0342-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Elmer SCHMITT, Respondent-Appellant, v. Pauline SCHMITT, Appellant-Respondent.
    Nos. 48950, 48882.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
    Aug. 20, 1985.
    Dana Hockensmith, Weier, Sherby, Hock-ensmith & Schoene, Hillsboro, for Elmer Schmitt.
    John B. Kistner, Rothman, Sokol & Adler, St. Louis, for Paulien Schmitt.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Wife appeals from division of property and denial of maintenance provisions of the decree in a dissolution of marriage proceeding. An extended opinion would have no precedential value and the judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).