Case ID: sw_234/html/1108-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SMITH, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SPARK et al. v. LASATER.
    (No. 6634.)
    (Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.
    Nov. 23, 1921.)
    Appeal and error <&wkey;>ll35 — Judgment affirmed where no error shown.
    Where there is no statement of facts, or findings of fact, or conclusions of law in the record, and neither party has filed briefs, and where there is no fundamental error apparent in the record, the judgment must be affirmed.
    Appeal from District Court, Bexar County; Robert W. B. Terrell, Judge.
    Action between George Spark and others and Ed. C. Lasater. From judgment for. the latter, the former appeal.
    Affirmed.
    See, also, 232 S. W. 345, 346; 234 S. W. 717.
   SMITH, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of appellee against appellants in the sum of $38,771.99, being- the amount of certain vendor’s lien notes executed and delivered by appellants to appellee as a part of the consideration for 1,329.5 acres of land situated in Brooks and Jim Wells counties, and foreclosing the vendor’s lien upon said land. The cause was tried before the court below, without a jury. We find no statement of facts, or findings of fact or conclusions of law in the record, and neither party has filed any briefs in the cause. We have examined the transcript of the proceedings in the court below, and have concluded that no fundamental error is apparent in the record. Wherefore the judgment of the court below must be affirmed.

Affirmed. 
      <S&wkey;For other oases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numhered Digests and Indexes