Case ID: f-appx_1/html/0135-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NATIONAL GRANGE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, and WOW, Incorporated, t/a Insurance Center of Williamsburg; Deborah Bresna-ham, Third Party Defendants-Appel-lees, v. Richard Lynwood CHISMAN, a/k/a Bay; Joyce Ann Chisman, Defendants-Appellants.
    No. 00-1334.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 20, 2000.
    Decided Jan. 8, 2001.
    Kenneth L. Roberts, Roberts & Roberts, P.C., Newport News, VA, for appellants. Robert Tayloe Ross, Michael L. Rigsby, Midkiff Muncie & Ross, P.C., Douglas M. Palais, McCandlish, Kane & Grant, Richmond, VA, for appellees.
    Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Richard Lynwood Chisman and Joyce Ann Chisman appeal from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees in this action in which National Grange Mutual Insurance Company sought a declaration that the insurance policy it issued to the Chismans was void. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the joint appendix, the supplemental joint appendix, and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. National Grange Mut. Ins. Co. v. Chisman, No. CA-99-362-3 (E.D.Va. Feb. 14, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.