Case ID: so2d_216/html/0434-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Emanuel BROWN, Petitioner, v. ARKIN CONSTRUCTION CO. et al., Respondents.
    No. 37907.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Dec. 16, 1968.
    Jerome H. Wolf son, Miami, for petitioner.
    C. E. Miller, of Wieland & Miller, Orlando, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date August 14, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10 subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

Accordingly the petitions for certiorari and attorney’s fee are denied.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.