Case ID: so2d_680/html/0633-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Prentice MATHIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 96-2163.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Oct. 16, 1996.
    Alan H. Sehreiber, Public Defender, and Donald J. Cannarozzi, Assistant Public Defender, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. However, as in Freeman v. State, 679 So.2d 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), we certify to the supreme court the following question as one of great public importance:

IS STATE V. GRAY, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla.1995) RETROACTIVE?

AFFIRMED.

DELL, STONE and GROSS, JJ., concur.