Case ID: ohio-st-3d_112/html/0101-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State ex rel. Kelsey-Hayes Company, Appellant, v. Heinlen et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as State ex rel. Kelsey-Hayes Co. v. Heinlen, 112 Ohio St.3d 101, 2006-Ohio-6508.]
    (No. 2006-0569
    Submitted November 15, 2006
    Decided December 27, 2006.)
   Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} Appellant, citing Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, 100 Ohio St.3d 216, 2003-Ohio-5849, 797 N.E.2d 1256, has asked us to overrule State ex rel. Thomas v. Indus. Comm., 97 Ohio St.3d 37, 2002-Ohio-5306, 776 N.E.2d 62. We declined an identical invitation in State ex rel. Internatl. Paper v. Trucinski, 106 Ohio St.3d 203, 2005-Ohio-4557, 833 N.E.2d 728. Accordingly, for the same reasons set forth in Trucinski, we again decline the invitation. The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P., William Michael Hanna, and Greta M. Kearns, for appellant.

Heinzerling & Goodman, L.L.C., and Jonathan H. Goodman, for appellee Rosalinda Heinlen.

Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Douglas R. Unver, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.