Case ID: nj-eq_78/html/0585-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John R. McNulty, respondent, v. Eugene J. McCarthy et al., appellants.
    [Argued March 15th, 1911.
    Decided June 19th, 1911.]
    On appeal from a decree of tbe conrt of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson, whose opinion is reported ante p. 865.
    
    
      Mr. Edward J. Luce, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. Charles H. Hartshorne, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Stevenson.

For affirmance — The Chiep-Justice, Garrison, Swayzb, Teen chard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenrurgh, Congdon, Sullivan — 12.

For reversal — None.