Case ID: so2d_454/html/0682-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael TUPICA and Nina Uglinica, Appellants, v. John MACINA, Appellee.
    No. 83-2622.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Aug. 1, 1984.
    Rehearing Denied Sept. 18, 1984.
    
      Philip J. Padovano, Tallahassee, and Richard B. Mateer of Richard B. Mateer, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellants.
    Gary R. Gromet, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record we believe that there is an adequate evidentiary basis to support the trial court’s judgment can-celling a warranty deed executed by the appellee in favor of the appellants. We also reject appellants’ claim that the trial court erred in failing to reform the terms of the deed, there having been no claim for reformation made by any of the parties in the trial court.

ANSTEAD, C.J., HURLEY, J., and GREEN, OLIVER L., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.