Case ID: so2d_275/html/0571-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles CLARK et al., Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 72-726.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 3, 1973.
    Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender and John Lipinski, Asst. Public Defender, for appellants.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ., and SACK, MARTIN, Associate Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

These appellants were tried jointly and found guilty of robbery by a jury. They were each sentenced to a term of twenty years in the State Penitentiary.

lt is their contention on appeal that the trial court erred in denying their motions for a mistrial and a severance.

We have carefully considered appellants’ points in the light of the record on appeal and briefs and have concluded that they are without merit and that no reversible error has been made to appear. Kelly v. State, Fla.App.1967, 202 So.2d 901; Reis v. State, Fla.App.1971, 248 So.2d 666; Woodside v. State, Fla.App.1968, 206 So.2d 426; Washington v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 210 So.2d 290.

Affirmed.