Case ID: f3d_8/html/0001-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David J. BARRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kirk FORDICE, Governor, in his capacity as Chairman and Commissioner of the State Bond Retirement Commission and in his capacity as Commissioner of the State Bond Commission, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 92-7806.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Nov. 10, 1993.
    Paul M. Neville, Minniece, Hamill, Wilson, Mitts & Neville, Jackson, MS, for plaintiffs-appellants.
    T. Hunt Cole, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Mike Moore, Atty. Gen., Jackson, MS, for defendants-appellees.
    Before GARWOOD and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges, and WALTER, District Judge.
    
      
       District Judge of the Western District of Louisiana, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs-appellants appeal the district court’s dismissal of their suit for want of jurisdiction under the Eleventh Amendment. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its'opinion. Barry v. Fordice, 814 F.Supp. 511 (S.D.Miss.1992).

AFFIRMED.