Case ID: ad2d_211/html/0605-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Second Department,
    January, 1995
    (January 4,1995)
    In the Matter of James F. Smith, Petitioner, v Kenneth Gribetz et al., Respondents.
    [621 NYS2d 883]
   Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit the respondents from continuing the prosecution of the petitioner under Rockland County Indictment No. 137/94 on the ground, inter alia, of lack of jurisdiction.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Relief in the nature of a writ of prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only where a court acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569; Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352; Matter of Steingut v Gold, 42 NY2d 311, 315-316). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Rosenblatt, Miller and Thompson, JJ., concur.