Case ID: so2d_894/html/0875-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Deanna DOYLE-VALLERY, M.D., et al., Petitioners, v. Julie B. ARANIBAR, et vir., Respondents.
    No. SC03-359.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Jan. 20, 2005.
    Richard R. Garland of Dickinson and Gibbons, P.A., Sarasota, FL, for Petitioner.
    Theodore C. Eastmoore of Matthews, Eastmoore, Hardy, Crauwels and Garcia, P.A., Sarasota, FL, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review the decision in Doyle-Vallery v. Aranibar, 838 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), which certified conflict with the decision in Allstate Insurance Co. v. Sarkis, 809 So.2d 6 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), which this Court subsequently approved in Sarkis v. Allstate Insurance Co., 863 So.2d 210 (Fla.2003). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We accept jurisdiction in this case, summarily quash the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Sarkis.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.