Case ID: f-appx_1/html/0223-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scotty ROACH, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 00-6837.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 26, 2000.
    Decided Jan. 12, 2001.
    
      Scotty Roach, pro se. John Warren Stone, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, NC, for appellee.
    Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Scotty Roach appeals the district court’s order declining to grant relief from Roach’s court-imposed restitution and denying Roach’s motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Roach, Nos. CR-93-122; CR-93-205 (M.D.N.C. June 2, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.