Case ID: nj_28/html/0519-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JULIA SARNER, PLAINTIFF, v. SIDNEY SARNER, DEFENDANT. IN THE MATTER OF SIDNEY SARNER, CHARGED WITH CONTEMPT, APPELLANT.
    Argued December 15, 1958
    Decided January 5, 1959.
    See also 45 N. J. Super. 216, 132 A. 2d 28, certification denied 25 N. J. 103, 135 A. 2d 59.
    
      
      Mr. Aaron IF. Nussman argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Bach, Nussman & Bose, attorneys).
    
      Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Coneord in the court below.

For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Heher, Wacheneeld, Burling, Jacobs, Francis and Proctor—7.

For reversal—Hone.