Case ID: ind_126/html/0600-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 14,429.
    Hunt, Guardian, et al. v. Williams.
    Filed Jan. 13, 1891.
    From the Hamilton Circuit Court.
    
      J. Buchanan, for appellants.
    
      R. R. Stephenson and W. R. Fertig, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

— This opinion, in which we all concur, was prepared for the court hy the late Judge Mitchell, and expresses the views and the judgment of the court.

The question upon which the merits of the controversy involved in this case must be determined are identical with those settled by the decision in Hunt v. Williams, ante, p. 493. Upon the authority of thatcase the judgment rendered in this case is affirmed, with costs.