Case ID: njl_76/html/0478-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. WILBUR J. FLYNN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted March 23, 1908
    Decided March 1, 1909.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    Por the plaintiff in error, Charles T. Cowenhoven.
    
    Por the defendant in error, George Berdine, prosecutor of the pleas.
   Per Curiam:.

This case raises the same questions that are involved in the case between the same parties, No. 15 of the March Term. Eor the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Chancellor in that ease the judgment under review herein should be reversed.

For affirmance—None.

For reversal—The Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Yoori-iebs, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Gray, Dill, J.J. 13.