Case ID: f-appx_333/html/0751-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronnie Junior ELLIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Doctor MARIETTA, Primary Physician of R.R.J.; Peter Ober, P/A of R.R.J.; Jane or John Doe, R.R.J. rep. or Employee Responsible for Major Medical Decisions of Treatment; Jane or John Doe, Unknown Employee or Rep(s) of R.R.J. Responsible for Interferring with Ellis’ Access to Courts, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 09-6976.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 15, 2009.
    Decided: Oct. 21, 2009.
    Ronnie Junior Ellis, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Francuzenko, Cook, Kitts & Francuzenko, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Junior Ellis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny his motion for discovery, deny his motion for a refund, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ellis v. Marietta, No. 2:07-cv-00867-MSD-JEB (E.D. Va. filed May 8, 2009; entered May 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.