Case ID: ala-app_23/html/0628-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SAMEORD, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(121 So. 922)
    Budd GANN and Joe Gann v. STATE.
    
      (7 Div. 484.)
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    March 19, 1929.
    Merrill & Field, of Anniston, for appellants.
    Charlie C. McCall,1' Atty. Gen., and Merwin T. ICoonce, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   SAMEORD, J.

Defendants were convicted of manufacturing whisky. There is no question of merit presented in this record for review. The defendants have had a fair trial, according to the forms of law. There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.