Case ID: f-appx_292/html/0670-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shannon HOLLISTER, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-30536.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 8, 2008.
    
    Filed Sept. 11, 2008.
    Helen J. Brunner, Esq., Bruce F. Mi-yake, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Paula S. Deutsch, Esq., Corey Endo, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Washington, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Shannon Hollister appeals from the 108-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for interstate murder for hire, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1958. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Hollister contends that the district court’s analysis of the sentencing factors set forth by 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) was inadequate and that the district court failed to resolve factual issues, including the nature of her mental disorder, before imposing her sentence. We conclude that the district court did not procedurally err. See Gall v. United States, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 586, 597-99, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); see also United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 994-95 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.