Case ID: njl_69/html/0675-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FRANK E. BENNETT, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. THE CITY OF ORANGE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted July 10, 1903
    Decided November 16, 1903.
    On error to thfe Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiff in error, Thomas A. Davis and Malcolm MacLear.
    
    For the defendant in error, William A. Lord.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment brought up by this writ of error is affirmed, .on the grounds set forth in the opinion of Mr. Justice Hendrickson in the Supreme Court, reported ante p. 176.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Voorhees, Yroom, Green, Gray. 12.

For reversdl—None.