Case ID: sw2d_892/html/0767-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marianne FENZL, Respondent, v. James GERHARDT, et al., Appellants, v. MAGNA BANK, f/k/a Landmark Bank of St. Charles, Respondent.
    No. 63774.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Jan. 10, 1995.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 22, 1995.
    William James O’Herin, Florissant, for appellant.
    Brian E. McGovern, McCarthy, Leonard, Kaemmerer, Owen, Laderman & Lamkin, Chesterfield, for respondent.
    Before AHRENS, P.J., and KAROHL and CRANE, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this court-tried case, defendants appeal from judgments in favor of plaintiff in consolidated suits on a promissory note and for damages for fraud and misrepresentation.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).