Case ID: f-appx_508/html/0222-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Sean Darnell FOWLKES, Petitioner.
    No. 12-2261.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 22, 2018.
    Decided: Jan. 30, 2013.
    Sean Darnell Fowlkes, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
   Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sean Fowlkes petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order directing the district court to modify its order dismissing a criminal case without prejudice to reflect a dismissal with prejudice. We deny the petition.

Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir.2003). Mandamus is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought, id. at 517, and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir.2007).

The relief sought by Fowlkes is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.