Case ID: so2d_508/html/0561-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John F. CLAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 85-2931.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 17, 1987.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and A.N. Radabaugh, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the revocation of his probation and sentence therefor.

We affirm the revocation of probation. We find no reversible error from his contention that adequate charging documents do not appear in the record. The record reflects that he was charged with certain probation violations of which he was found guilty, and there was no objection to any failure to advise him of the charges.

However, there must be a remand for resentencing. While the trial court orally departed from the sentencing guidelines, no written reasons were provided, and the oral reasons were clearly insufficient under the case law.

Reversed and remanded for resentencing within the guidelines recommended sentencing range.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., LEHAN and FRANK, JJ., concur.