Case ID: f2d_977/html/1435-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BELLSOUTH ADVERTISING & PUBLISHING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v. DONNELLY INFORMATION PUBLISHING, INC. and the Reuben H. Donnelly Corp., Defendants-Counterclaim Plaintiffs-Appellants, Bellsouth Corporation, et al., Counterclaim Defendants.
    No. 89-5131.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Nov. 4, 1992.
    Douglas C. Broeker, Michael J. Cappucio, Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Strickroot, Miami, Fla., David L. Foster, Theodore Case Whitehouse, Francis J. Men-ton, Jr., Willkie, Farr & Gallager, Baila H. Celedonia, Roger L. Zissu, Cowan, Liebow-itz & Latman, P.C., New York City, for appellants.
    Robert E. Richards, Anthony B. Askew, Jones, Askew & Lunsford, Atlanta, Ga., for BellSouth Advertising.
    John K. Roedel, Jr., Senniger, Powers, Leavitt & Roedel, St. Louis, Mo., for ami-cus ANADP.
    Robert E. Marsh, Blackwell, Sanders, Matheny, Weary & Lombardi, Kansas City, Mo., for amicus US West.
    Robert Alan Garrett, Arnold & Porter, Washington, D.C., for amicus Bell Atlantic.
    
      
       Judges Phyllis A. Kravitch, R. Lanier Anderson, III, Emmett R. Cox and Joel F. Dubina have recused themselves and will not participate.
    
   ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, HATCHETT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.