Case ID: so2d_789/html/1204-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James Roy MELTON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 99-789.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    July 18, 2001.
    Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Karen E. Ehrlich, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine M. Germa-nowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   ON REMAND

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the supreme court’s mandate in State v. Melton, 786 So.2d 1168 (Fla.2001), we have reconsidered our opinion in Melton v. State, 746 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), in light of Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000), State v. Cotton, 769 So.2d 345 (Fla.2000), McKnight v. State, 769 So.2d 1039 (Fla.2000), and Ellis v. State, 762 So.2d 912 (Fla.2000). Upon reconsideration, we withdraw our original opinion and remand to the trial court with directions to reinstate the original sentence.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

DELL, GUNTHER, and WARNER, JJ., concur.