Case ID: ad3d_122/html/0933-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Tamara Williams et al., Fetitioners, v Loren Baily-Schiffman et al., Respondents.
    [995 NYS2d 914]
   Froceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit Loren Baily-Schiffman, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, from enforcing an order dated September 23, 2014, that was issued in a guardianship proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81, pending in that court under index No. 100147/12.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]; see Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]). The petitioners failed to establish a clear legal right to relief in the nature of prohibition.

Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Chambers and Maltese, JJ., concur.