Case ID: ny_137/html/0592-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alfred Roe et al., Executors, etc., et al., Respondents, v. Caroline A. Strong et al., Appellants.
    (Argued February 2, 1893;
    decided February 28, 1893.)
    Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered (upon an order made May 12,1892, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
    The following is the memorandum of opinion: “ Judgment affirmed with costs on authority of previous opinon of this court (119 N. Y. 316) and upon the opinion rendered below at Special Term; the difficulty suggested with respect to the boundaries in the Brewster-Seaton deed is to be satisfactorily resolved, upon careful consideration, in the way suggested by Judge Bartlett.”
    
      A. A. Spear for appellants.
    
      John J. Macklin for respondents.
   Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Order affirmed.