Case ID: so2d_298/html/0205-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Oswaldo RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Eddie Rodriguez, et al., Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 72-175.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 31, 1974.
    Henry Gonzalez, Tampa, for appellants.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard C. Booth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the state made no effort to comply with the wiretap minimization requirements of F.S. § '934.09(5), the judgments are hereby reversed on the authority of Rodriguez v. State, Fla.1974, 297 So.2d 15.

BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., GRIMES, J., and DAKAN, STEPHEN L., Associate Judge, concur.