Case ID: tex-crim_126/html/0300-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "LATTIMORE, Judge. —", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mineola Goston v. The State.
    No. 16882.
    Delivered May 16, 1934.
    The opinion states the case.
    
      King, Mahaffey, Wheeler & Bryson, of Texarkana, for appellant.
    
      Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.
   LATTIMORE, Judge. —

Conviction for robbery; punishment, eight years in the penitentiary.

The record is here without statement of facts or bills of exception. Appellant made a motion in arrest of judgment in which she brings forward the proposition that the indictment in this case is duplicitous in that it alleges that appellant unlawfully, in and upon Willie D. Johnson, made an assault, and did then and there by the said assault, and by violence to the said Willie D. Johnson, and by putting him in fear of life and bodily injury, — and by using and exhibiting a firearm, to-wit: a gun, fraudulently, and without the consent of the said Willie D. Johnson, take from the person and possession of him, the said Willie D. Johnson, etc. In the following cases this form of indictment has been held not duplicitous: Green v. State, 66 Texas Crim. Rep., 452; Robinson v. State, 67 Texas Crim. Rep., 79; Lay, et al. v. State, 82 Texas Crim. Rep., 202; Crouch v. State, 87 Texas Crim. Rep., 115; Todd v. State, 89 Texas Crim. Rep., 99.

The indictment appearing to be in proper form, and perceiving no error, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.