Case ID: okla-crim_15/html/0688-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROSS BECKETT v. STATE.
    No. A-3193.
    Opinion Filed April 5, 1919.
    Appeal from District Court, Garfield County; J. C. Robberts, Judge.
    H. J. Sturgis, for plaintiff in error.
    The Attorney General and W. C. Hall, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tor tne State.
   PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Ross Beckett, was convicted of keeping a place in the city of Enid with the felonious intent and pul-póse of selling intoxicating liquors. To reverse the judgment rendered on the verdict, he appeals. In the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, the statute upon which this prosecution was based, is held unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment is reversed.