Case ID: f-appx_628/html/0743-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darren Christopher ROYAL, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-12121
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Jan. 15, 2016.
    Jason R. Coody, Pamela C. Marsh, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Michael Robert Uffermaii, Michael Uf-ferman Law Firm, PA, Tallahassee, FL, for Defendan1>-Appellant.
    
      Before HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Michael Ufferman, counsel for Darren Royal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Royal’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.