Case ID: nj_66/html/0557-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOHN BICANICH, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Argued February 18, 1975
    Decided February 26, 1975.
    
      Mr. Julian Wilsey, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
    
      
      Mr. Daniel J. Carluccio argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Citta, Gasser, Carluccio and Holzapfel, attorneys).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division, 132 N. J. Super. 393.

For affirmance- — -Chief Justice Hughes, Justices Jacobs, Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman and Clifford and Judge Conford — 7.

For reversal — None.