Case ID: ind-app_101/html/0456-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Wood, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Melvin et al. v. Hamilton, Administrator.
    [No. 15,194.
    Filed February 6, 1936.]
    
      
      V. J. McCarty, for appellants.
    
      O. W. Hubbard, for appellees.
   Wood, J.

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment of the Franklin Circuit Court. The sole error assigned for reversal is the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial. The appellants have failed to set out a copy of their motion for a new trial or the substance thereof in their brief. The brief also fails to show that any time was given in which to file a bill of exceptions containing the evidence and proceedings of the trial court or that any bill of exceptions approved by such court was ever filed and made a part of the record. Thus no question is presented for our consideration. State ex rel. v. Hinds (1929), 200 Ind. 613, 165 N. E. 754; United Paperboard Co. v. Muncie, etc., Co. (1926), 84 Ind. App. 333, 151 N. E. 365; Indiana Service Corporation v. Daily (1928), 87 Ind. App. 6, 159 N. E. 767; Rule 21, Supreme and Appellate Courts.

The death of appellee having been suggested the judgment is affirmed as of date of submission.