Case ID: sw2d_955/html/0218-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gerry ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 71749.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Oct. 21, 1997.
    
      S. Page Canfield, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for Appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.
    Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gerry Anderson (Movant) appeals order, judgment and decree denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find and conclude that the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).