Case ID: so2d_677/html/0198-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. BUTTS, Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CITY OF TUSCALOOSA v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the POLICE & FIREMEN’S PENSION FUND. CITY OF TUSCALOOSA v. Eddie PUGH, et al. Eddie PUGH, et al. v. CITY OF TUSCALOOSA. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the FIREMEN’S AND POLICEMEN’S PENSION & RELIEF FUND v. CITY OF TUSCALOOSA.
    1930463, 1930467, 1930515 and 1930526.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Jan. 19, 1996.
    Rehearing Denied April 12, 1996.
    Burton Flanagan, Asst. City Atty., Robert W. Ennis IV, City Atty., for City of Tuscaloosa.
    Jack Drake of Drake & Pierce, Tuscaloosa, for Eddie Pugh, et al.
    Robert F. Prince and Jonathan Cross of Prince, Baird & Poole, P.C., Tuscaloosa, for Board of Trustees of Firemen’s and Policemen’s Pension & Relief Fund.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R.App.P.

HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES, HOUSTON, KENNEDY, INGRAM, and COOK, JJ., concur.

BUTTS, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.

BUTTS, Justice

(concurring in part and dissenting in part).

I concur in the affirmance of the trial court’s judgments, except to the extent that it affirms that portion of the judgments holding that the non-claims statute, Ala.Code 1975, § 11-47-23, applied to the plaintiffs’ claim regarding tax revenues from fire insurance premiums. I dissent from the affir-mance of that portion.