Case ID: conn_155/html/0695-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Elizabeth Loubet v. Albert E. Loubet
    King, C. J., Alcorn, House, Thim and Ryan, Js.
    Argued June 6
    decided June 8, 1967
    
      
      Stephen N. Schaffer, with whom, on the brief, was Bichard S. Weinstein, for the appellant (defendant).
    
      J. Bichard Fay, with whom, on the brief, was Kenneth Garfunkel, for the appellee (plaintiff).
   Per Curiam.

The opposing affidavit of the defendant contained no recital of facts which would be admissible in evidence, nor was any documentary proof submitted to show that there was a genuine issue as to any material fact alleged in the complaint. Practice Book §§ 300, 303; Kasowitz v. Mutual Construction Co., 154 Conn. 607, 613, 228 A.2d 149; Rathkopf v. Pearson, 148 Conn. 260, 263, 170 A.2d 135.

There is no error.