Case ID: cust-ct_60/html/0883-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Watson, Judge:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(R.D. 11535)
    Park Benziger Export Corp. v. United States
    Entry No. 587.
    
      (Decided May 28, 1968)
    
      Stitt and Bemmendinger for the plaintiff.
    
      Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
   Watson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:
1. The merchandise which is the subject of the above-captioned reappraisement appeal consists of tennis shoes imported July 5, 1961, under Entry No. 587 through the Port of Los Angeles.
2. The merchandise was returned by the Appraiser as having soles wholly or in chief value of india rubber or substitutes for rubber, dutiable upon the American selling price as defined in -Section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, under the authority of the Presidential Proclamation set forth in 63 Treas. Dec. 232, T.D. 46158; and was assessed at $2.65 per pair less 2%, net packed.
3. The material of chief value of the soles was high styrene resin, which was not rubber or a substitute for rubber and does not fall within the purview of the Presidential Proclamation set forth in 63 Treas. Dec. 232; T.D. 46158, and is, therefore, not subject to appraisement on the basis of American Selling Price.
4. Said footwear is not identified in the Final List, published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54521, effective Febi'uary 27th, 1958.
5. On or about the date of exportation, such or similar footwear was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, at the invoice unit prices, plus packing, plus items marked inland freight and other charges as noted on the invoice, said prices including 'the cost -of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States.
6. The instant appeal for reappraisement may be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such value was the invoice unit price, plus packing, plus items marked inland freight and other charges as noted on the invoice.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.