Case ID: so2d_529/html/0762-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Francisco CANO, a/k/a Paco Cano, Appellee.
    No. 88-294.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 19, 1988.
    Rehearing Denied Sept. 2, 1988.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Yvette Rhodes Prescott, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
    
      John H. Lipinski, Miami, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s sentence outside of the guidelines is reversed because it is not accompanied by the required written statement delineating the reasons for departure. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6); State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985); Vidal v. State, 516 So.2d 1051 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Reversed and remanded.