Case ID: f-appx_475/html/0939-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Curtis BURSTON, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 12-6970.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 16, 2012.
    Decided: Aug. 21, 2012.
    Curtis Burston, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Ann Moore, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Burston, Jr., appeals district court orders denying his motion for relief from his sentence and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders, and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Burston, No. 5:04-cr-00371-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 2012; May 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.