Case ID: f-appx_3/html/0644-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard Samuel DARLING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Terry L. STEWART; Dave Stevenson; T. Smith, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 99-17287.
    D.C. No. CV-97-2671-ROS.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 12, 2001.
    
    Decided Feb. 21, 2001.
    Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      . The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Richard “Samuel Darling, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the judgment of the district court dismissing with prejudice his civil rights complaint pursuant to the screening provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s orders filed on December 19, 1998 and September 13,1999.

AFFIRMED. 
      
      . This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     
      
      . Defendants made no appearance before the district court or in this court.