Case ID: ad_208/html/0707-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nathan Freedman and Another, Copartners, etc., Appellants, v. Philip Goldfarb and Others, Respondents.
   Order affirmed, without costs. We are of opinion that the Special Term had jurisdiction to entertain the motion in the circumstances shown by the record, and that it was not an abuse of discretion to open the default. Neither at Special Term nor in this court did the appellants seek the imposition of terms as a condition of opening the default; hence, we affirm the order without terms. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.