Case ID: f-appx_263/html/0649-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julian CERVANTES-VILLEGAS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-10078.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 14, 2008.
    
    Filed Jan. 18, 2008.
    James R. Knapp, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Julian Cervantes-Villegas, Florence, AZ, pro se.
    David M. Ochoa, Esq., Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: HALL, O’SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds tills case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Julian Cervantes-Villegas appeals from the guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sentence imposed for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss the appeal.

When Cervantes-Villegas entered into a plea agreement with the government, he waived his right to appeal from the district court’s entry of judgment and the imposition of a sentence provided that the sentence was consistent with his plea agreement. Because Cervantes-Villegas was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we enforce the appeal waiver and dismiss this appeal. See United States v. Jeronimo, 398 F.3d 1149, 1153-55 (9th Cir.2005); see also United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182-83 (9th Cir.2000).

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.