Case ID: sw3d_204/html/0675-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Paul CARUTHERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 87234.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Oct. 31, 2006.
    Daniel L. Mohs, Saint Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Paul Caruthers appeals the judgment denying his motion under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035 to vacate, set aside, or correct judgment or sentence. The court erroneously denied Caruthers’s amended motion for untimeliness. The court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law on the merits, however, are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b)(2).