Case ID: f-appx_450/html/0680-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kenneth A. SIERRA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRANNIS, Chief Inmate Appeals; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 09-15234.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 27, 2011.
    
    Filed Sept. 29, 2011.
    Kenneth A. Sierra, Corcoran, CA, pro se.
    Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

California state prisoner Kenneth Sierra appeals pro se from the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action on the grounds that Sierra’s complaint was nearly incomprehensible. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court did not err in dismissing Sierra’s action. We agree that the complaint lacks an arguable basis in either law or fact. See 28 U.S.C. § § 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.