Case ID: ohio-st-3d_126/html/1223-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Disciplinary Counsel v. Young.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Young, 126 Ohio St.3d 1223, 2010-Ohio-3846.]
    (Nos. 2003-1865 and 2006-1261
    — Submitted July 6, 2010
    — Decided July 20, 2010.)
   {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing on September 3, 2009, of a petition for reinstatement by respondent, James Cornell Young. In accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(10)(F), respondent’s petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. The board filed its final report in this court on February 19, 2010, recommending that respondent’s petition for reinstatement be denied. On May 24, 2010, this court denied respondent’s petition for reinstatement. Respondent filed a motion for reconsideration on June 3, 2010. Upon consideration thereof,

{¶ 2} It is ordered by this court that the motion for reconsideration is hereby granted and that respondent, James Cornell Young, Attorney Registration No. 0034227, last known address in Shaker Heights, Ohio, is reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio.

{¶ 3} It is further ordered by the court that respondent be taxed the costs of these proceedings in the amount of $657.96, less the deposit of $500.00, for a total balance due of $157.96 payable by respondent by certified check or money order on or before ninety days from the date of this order. If costs are not paid on or before 90 days from the date of this order, interest at the rate of 10% per annum will accrue until costs are paid in full. It is further ordered that if costs are not paid in full on or before 90 days from the date of this order, respondent may be found in contempt and suspended until all costs and accrued interest are paid in full.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that within 90 days of the date of this order, respondent shall reimburse any amounts that have been awarded against respondent by the Clients’ Security Fund pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F). It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that if, after the date of this order, the Clients’ Security Fund awards any amount against respondent pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), respondent shall reimburse that amount to the Clients’ Security Fund within 90 days of the notice of such award.

{¶ 5} It is further ordered, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form,' number, and timeliness of filings. Ml case documents are subject to Rules 44 through 47 of the Rules of Superintendence for the Courts of Ohio, which govern access to court records.

{¶ 6} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 7} For earlier cases, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Young, 102 Ohio St.3d 113, 2004-Ohio-1809, 807 N.E.2d 317, and 113 Ohio St.3d 36, 2007-Ohio-975, 862 N.E.2d 504.

Brown, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, O’Connor, and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.