Case ID: f-appx_390/html/0280-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce Lee JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 10-6271.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit,
    Submitted: July 20, 2010.
    Decided: Aug. 11, 2010.
    Bruce Lee Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. William E. Day, II, Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorneys, Florence, South Carolina, for Appel-lee.
    Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bruce Lee Johnson appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Dillon v. United States, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010); United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 250-52 (4th Cir.2009). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson, No. 4:02-cr-00579-CWH-2 (D.S.C. Feb. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED