Case ID: f_255/html/0992-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SMITH v. UNITED STATES.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    February 3, 1919.)
    No. 3264.
    In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Fourth Division of the Territory of Alaska.
    R. F. Roth, U. S. ,Atty., and Harry E. Pratt, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Fairbanks, Alaska, and Annette Abbott Adams, U. S. Atty., of San Francisco, Cal.
   PER CURIAM.

Motion for dismissal of writ of error for noncompliance by the plaintiff in error with the provisions of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the Rules of Practice of this court (208 Fed. ix, 124 C. C. A. ix) granted, and writ of error dismissed.