Case ID: f-appx_472/html/0736-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ramon CERVANTES-GARIVAY, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 10-72692.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 17, 2012.
    
    Filed April 23, 2012.
    Charles Medina, Law Office of Charles Medina, Buena Park, CA, for Petitioner.
    
      Oil, Corey Leigh Farrell, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
    Before LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Ramon Cervantes-Garivay, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Department of Homeland Security’s order reinstating his 1999 removal order under 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(5). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Garcia de Rincon v. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 539 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir.2008), and we deny the petition for review.

Because Cervantes-Garivay has failed to demonstrate a gross miscarriage of justice in his prior removal proceedings, he may not collaterally attack his 1999 removal order in this petition for review. See id. at 1137-38 (a petitioner may not obtain collateral review of an underlying removal order unless he demonstrates “a gross miscarriage of justice” in the underlying proceedings).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.