Case ID: ga_177/html/0763-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Hill, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Vickery v. Suttles et al.; et vice versa.
    
    Nos. 9670, 9671.
    October 12, 1933.
    
      H. T. Golightly, for plaintiff in error. J. Wilson B writer, contra.
   Hill, J.

Under the pleadings and the evidence the judge, to whom was submitted the questions involved without the intervention of a jury, was authorized to find in favor of the plaintiffs in fi. fa., and against the claimant.

Judgment affirmed on the main bill of exceptions; cross-bill dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, O. J., who dissents.