Case ID: or_19/html/0163-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Oueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[Filed April 23, 1890.
    M. FISK, Respondent, v. THE N. P. R. R. CO., Appellant.
    Appeal from Columbia county: F. J. Taylok, judge.
    
      Dolph, Bellinger, Mallory & Siw.on, for Appellant.
    
      R. & E. B. Williams and Sears & Beach, for Respondent.
    Moses v. S.P.R. R. Co., 18 Or. 385, approved and followed.
   Pee Oueiam.

The court below held in this case that the railway company was required under the statute to fence its depot. .

In a recent case—Moses v. S. P. R. R. Co., 18 Or. 385,—we held otherwise, and the reasons therein stated render it unnecessary to further consider that question.

The judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered.