Case ID: f-appx_326/html/0169-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George E. BURDICK, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. PRITCHETT & BIRCH, PLLC; Lloyd C. Smith, Jr.; Regina Parker; Samuel Grimes; Christopher B. McLendon, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 09-1216.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 28, 2009.
    Decided: June 5, 2009.
    George E. Burdick, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Graham Baker, Baker, Jenkins, Jones & Daly, PA, Ahoskie, North Carolina, Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

George E. Burdick appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss his civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burdick v. Pritchett & Birch, PLLC, No.4:08-cv-00053-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 2008; Jan. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.