Case ID: sw2d_882/html/0764-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 65409.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Aug. 30, 1994.
    Tamara L. Detloff, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Traci J. Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before GRIMM, C.J., and CRIST and CRANDALL, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals after the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5).

Further, we find an opinion in this case would have no precedential value and affirm by summary order. Rule 84.16(b). We have provided a memorandum to the parties for their use only.