Case ID: f-appx_519/html/0205-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronald D. WASHINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I, Defendant-Appellee, and United States Postal Service, Defendant.
    No. 12-2524.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 25, 2013.
    Decided: April 29, 2013.
    Ronald D. Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Connor Crook, III, Boyle, Bain, Reback & Slayton, Charlottesville, Virginia; Christopher S. Griesmeyer, Grei-man Rome & Griesmeyer, LLC, Chicago, Illinois, for Appellee.
    Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald D. Washington appeals the district court’s order denying relief in his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. Kroger Ltd. P’ship I, No. 3:11-cv-00074-NKM-JGW, 2012 WL 6025755 (W.D.Va. Dec. 4, 2012). Appel-lee’s motions to strike Washington’s addendum to his informal brief and for sanctions are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.