Case ID: f-appx_699/html/0235-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Steven ROLLAKANTI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee, and William Federick; Andrene Towsen; Johny Niles, Defendants.
    No. 17-1953
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: October 19, 2017
    Decided: October 23, 2017
    Steven Rollakanti, Appellant Pro Se. Robert R. Niccolini, OGLETREE DEA-KINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven Rollakanti appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for an extension of time in which to file an amended complaint after the court had dismissed the complaint in part without prejudice. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Rolla-kanti’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Rollakanti has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the. appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED