Case ID: wash_66/html/0225-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 10054.
    Department Two.
    December 15, 1911.]
    The State of Washington, on the Relation of W. A. Coplen et al., Plaintiff, v. The Superior Court for Spokane County, Respondent.
      
    
    Certiorari — When Lies — Remedy by Appeal. Certiorari does not lie to review an order denying a motion to quasb a summons on tbe ground that tbe service was not made in tbe manner prescribed by law, since tbe same is reviewable on appeal from tbe final judgment.
    Application for a Writ of certiorari filed in the supreme court, December 11, 1911, to review an order of the superior court for Spokane county, Webster, J., entered October 10, 1911, denying a motion to quash a summons on the ground that the service was not made in the manner prescribed by law.
    Denied.
    
      Cannon, Ferris & Swan and John B. White, for relators.
    
      Fred H. Witt, for respondent.
    
      
      Reported in 119 Pac. 383.
    
   Per Curiam.

The relators have applied for a writ of certiorari to the superior court of Spokane county, asking us to review certain orders made by the superior court in a case then pending before it, wherein H. R. Von Dreathen is plaintiff and W. A. Copien and wife are defendants. From an inspection of the application and the record before us, we are of the opinion that all the questions sought to be determined upon this hearing may properly be raised upon appeal. Therefore, following the established practice of this court in such cases, the writ is denied.