Case ID: so3d_231/html/0608-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:'", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE EX REL. Vincent SMITH v. STATE of Louisiana
    No. 2017-KH-1851
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    12/15/2017
   ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TQ THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON

PER CURIAM:'

I,WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Untimely filed pursuant to La.S.Ct.R. X § 5.

Relator has now exhausted the right to obtain post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr,P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural 'bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator has filed an application for - post-conviction relief in the district court, and the district court’s ruling denying relief is now' final. Hereafter, unless relator can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted the right-to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per cu-riam.