Case ID: f-appx_56/html/0825-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mikela MINACIS, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. BOEING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 02-35450.
    D.C. No. CV-01-00697-TSZ.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 24, 2003.
    
    Decided Feb. 28, 2003.
    Before CHOY, FARRIS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Mina-cis’ request for oral argument is denied.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Mikela Minacis (“Minacis”), an African American man, appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of his former employer, the Boeing Company, in Minacis’ action alleging he was terminated on the basis of his race, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s summary judgment, see Oliver v. Keller, 289 F.3d 623, 626 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm.

Although Minacis presented the minimal evidence necessary to establish a prima facie ease of racial discrimination, he failed to rebut Boeing’s legitimate, non-discriminatory basis for his termination. See Ara-gon v. Republic Silver State Disposal Inc., 292 F.3d 654, 659 (9th Cir.2002). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.