Case ID: f-appx_147/html/0153-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gustavo Paz DE LA CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 04-14979
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    D.C. Docket No. 03-00281-CR-T-23-EAJ.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Oct. 25, 2005.
    Todd B. Grandy, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Ronald S. Tulin, Plant City, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Ronald S. Tulin, appointed counsel for Gustavo Paz De La Cruz in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and De La Cruz’s conviction and sentence are AF FIRMED.