Case ID: f-appx_136/html/0585-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Danny Antonio JORDAN, Sr., Defendant—Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Brandi Latoya Jordan, Defendant—Appellant.
    Nos. 05-6269, 05-6288.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 23, 2005.
    Decided: June 29, 2005.
    Danny Antonio Jordan, Sr., Brandi LaToya Jordan, Appellants pro se.
    Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Danny Antonio Jordan, Sr., and Brandi LaToya Jordan appeal the district court’s order denying their motion to amend the judgment order entered on November 5, 2003. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Jordan, Nos. CR-01-70031-6-001; CR-01-70031-6-002 (W.D.Va. Jan. 26, 2005). We grant the Government’s motion to file its informal brief out of time, grant Brandi Jordan’s motion to amend her informal brief, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED