Case ID: ny-2d_97/html/0712-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[765 NE2d 851, 739 NYS2d 355]
    Town of Conklin, Respondent, v Douglas Ritter, Appellant.
    Decided February 7, 2002
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Douglas Ritter, appellant pro se.
    
    
      Coughlin & Gerhart, L. L. P., Binghamton (Keith A. O’Hara of counsel), for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. The courts below correctly concluded that the State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code applies to defendant’s building. Defendant’s remaining arguments are either unpreserved or without merit.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.