Case ID: f-appx_272/html/0292-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James MACKLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MIRANT SERVICES, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellee, and Potomac Electric Power Company, Defendant.
    No. 05-2370.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 13, 2008.
    Decided: April 8, 2008.
    Timothy B. Fleming, Keir S. Bicker-staffe, Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis, P.L.L.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Neal D. Mollen, Carson H. Sullivan, Courtney Mueller, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Ap-pellee.
    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Macklin appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Mirant Services, L.L.C., on his Title VII complaint alleging race discrimination and retaliation. We have reviewed the record included on appeal and the parties’ briefs and have found no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Macklin v. Mirant Servs., L.L.C., No. CA-05-555-1 (E.D.Va. filed Nov. 4, 2005 & entered Nov. 9, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.