Case ID: ga_65/html/0302-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rahilly et al. vs. Horton ; The Sum. Mac. R. Co. vs. Bohler ; Cottle et al. vs. Cottle et al.; Franke vs. Berkner et al.
    
    The bill and answer, and the affidavits in support of each, being conflicting, this court will not control the discretion of the chancellor in granting an injunction. Whilst in his order the chancellor stated that he declined to decide the facts in dispute, yet the grant of an injunction shows on which side he considered the evidence preponderated.