Case ID: njl_131/html/0092-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MAX SILBERG, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JACOB KLARFIELD, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
    Submitted October 5, 1943
    Decided January 5, 1944.
    Before Justices Case, Donges and Porter.
    For the plaintiff-appellant, Rothbard, Greenstone & Harris.
    
    For the defendant-appellee, no appearance.
   Per Curiam.

Plaintiff-appellant sued in the Pirst District Court of the City of Newark to recover $50 on each of six counts, plus attorney’s fees and costs, upon the allegation that the defendant-appellee had demanded and received from the plaintiff the sum of $35 per month for six months, from April, 1943, to October, 1943, for a dwelling unit, while the maximum rent permitted under a regulation established by the Administrator of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1943 was $33 per. month. The trial judge held “that this suit was in fact a proceeding to collect penalties not imposed or authorized by any statute of the State of New Jersey; that this court had no jurisdiction and dismissed the suit.” Plaintiff thereupon took this appeal.

We conclude that this appeal is controlled by the recent opinion of this court in Beasley v. Gottlieb, 131 N. J. L. 117, which leads to a reversal of the judgment in this ease. Costs to abide the event.