Case ID: so2d_562/html/1322-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HOUSTON, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte DRUMMOND COMPANY, INC. (Re DRUMMOND COMPANY, INC., as successor to Alabama By-Products Corporation v. Betty LOLLEY).
    89-426.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    March 30, 1990.
    Richard E. Fikes of Tweedy, Jackson & Beech, Jasper, for petitioner.
    Hoyt Elliott and Hoyt Elliott, Jr. of Elliott & Elliott, Jasper, for respondent.
   HOUSTON, Justice.

After carefully reviewing the petition, the record, and the briefs, we conclude that the writ of certiorari is due to be quashed as having been improvidently granted. In quashing the writ, however, we do not wish to be understood as agreeing with the reasoning of the Court of Civil Appeals concerning the applicability of Ex parte St. Regis Corp., 535 So.2d 160 (Ala.1988).

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and JONES, SHORES and KENNEDY, JJ., concur.