Case ID: njl_87/html/0329-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. LEON O. HART, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted July 10, 1914—
    Decided March 25, 1915.
    On error to the Supreme Court, in which court the following per curiam was filed:
    
      “Per curiam—The indictment in this case must be quashed. The case cannot be distinguished from State v. Nugent, 48 Vroom 157.”
    Eor ilie plaintiff in error, Harlan Besson and Mark Townsend, Jr.
    
    Eor the defendant in error, Robert H. Hudspeth, prosecutor of the pleas.
   Per Curiam.

The court being equally divided in opinion, the judgment under review must be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee Justice, Parker, Minturn, Kalisct-i, Bogeet, Vredenburgh, Williams, JJ. 7.

For reversal—The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenohard,' Black, White, Terhune, Hepeenheimer, JJ. 7.