Case ID: us_310/html/0613-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 998.
    Saenger Realty Corp. v. Grosjean, Collector of Revenue.
    May 27, 1940.
   Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U. S. 441, 443. (2) Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U. S. 30, 32; Leffingwell v. Warren, 2 Black 599, 603; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co., 287 U. S. 358, 362.

Mr. Charles Rosen for appellant.

Messrs. F. A. Blanche and E. Leland Richardson for ap-pellee.