Case ID: ad3d_90/html/0755-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Rachel Fulmer, Appellant, v Michael Buxenbaum, Jr., Respondent.
    [936 NYS2d 550]
   An order of filiation may be vacated on the grounds of “fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party” (CPLR 5015 [a] [3]; see Matter of Jose F.R. v Reina C.A., 46 AD3d 564 [2007]). The Family Court properly denied the mother’s application to vacate the order of filiation entered in the instant proceeding because she failed to make a prima facie showing of fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct (see CPLR 5015 [a] [3]; Matter of Vernon J. v Sandra M., 36 AD3d 912 [2007]).

The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.P, Leventhal, Belen and Roman, JJ., concur.