Case ID: f-appx_688/html/0227-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Christopher ODEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eric D. WILSON, Warden, Federal Correctional Complex, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 16-7680
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 7, 2017
    Decided: May 5, 2017
    
      Christopher Oden, Appellant Pro Se,
    Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher William Oden, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Oden v. Wilson, No. 3:15-cv-00196-JAG-RCY, 2016 WL 183469, 2016 WL 6634883 (E.D. Va. Jan. 11, 2016 & Nov. 8, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED 
      
       We have construed Oden's March 9, 2016 motion for a certificate of appealability as a timely notice of appeal from the district court's order denying his § 2241 petition. See Marmolejo v. United States, 196 F.3d 377, 378 (2d Cir. 1999) (holding that motion for certificate of appealability should be treated as notice of appeal).