Case ID: pa_420/html/0629-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam, Mr. Justice Roberts:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Commonwealth ex rel. Meholchick, Appellant, v. Rundle.
    January 4, 1966:
    Submitted November 11, 1965.
    Before Bell, C. J., Musmanno, Jones, Eagen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.
    
      Raymond Meholchick, appellant, in propria persona.
    
      Anthony B. Panaway, Assistant District Attorney, Robert J. Hourigan, First Assistant District Attorney, and Thomas E. Mack, District Attorney, for appellee.
   Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from an order below dismissing an action of habeas corpus without hearing.

The order was correct. The issues raised are adequately discussed and answered in Commonwealth ex rel. Fox v. Maroney, 417 Pa. 308, 207 A. 2d 810 (1965), and Commonwealth ex rel. Cuevas v. Rundle, 418 Pa. 373, 211 A. 2d 485 (1965).

Order affirmed.

Concurring Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts:

I concur for the reasons stated in my concurring opinion in Commonwealth ex rel. Hargrove v. Maroney, 420 Pa. 120, 215 A. 2d 635 (1966).