Case ID: ad2d_6/html/0884-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Leo D. Epstein et al., Respondents, v. Harry Heiman, Appellant.
   — In an action by the vendees in a contract of sale of real property, to recover damages for breach of the contract, the vendor counterclaimed for specific performance. The appeal is from so much of an order as denied the vendor’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and for summary judgment in his favor on the counterclaim. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs, and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.