Case ID: sw3d_50/html/0799-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Montrell WORTHY, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 78162.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    May 9, 2001.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 13, 2001.
    Application for Transfer Denied Aug. 21, 2001.
    Deborah B. Wafer, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Linda Lemke, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    
      Before MOONEY, P.J., SIMON and SULLIVAN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Montrell Worthy, appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).