Case ID: ga-app_12/html/0220-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Russell, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

4214.
    Alligood v. Daniel & King.
    Decided February 4, 1913.
    Complaint; from city court of Dublin—Judge Hicks. April 12, 1912.
    
      S. P. New, for plaintiff in error.
    
      B. B. Flynt, contra.
   Russell, J.

1. A promise to execute and deliver a policy of life insurance if, after a medical examination, the maker of a note, given for the insurance premium, proves to he an insurable risk, is not an absolute promise to execute and deliver a policy, and will not authorize the original payee to recover on the note, where no offer to deliver the policy has been made; 'and this is true though the maker of the note refused to submit to a medical examination, and, in consequence, his application for insurance was never accepted.

2. The evidence demanded a finding in favor of the defendant, and it was error to render a judgment for the plaintiff. Judgment reversed.