Case ID: sw2d_814/html/0001-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Mark Orin EMRY, Appellant.
    No. WD 43007.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    July 23, 1991.
    As Modified Aug. 27, 1991.
    Mark Orin Emry, Independence, pro se.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.
    Before KENNEDY, P.J., and SHANGLER and ULRICH, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Appeal from conviction of two counts of carrying a concealed weapon, § 571.030, RSMo, and fines of $100 on each count. The case is remanded to the trial court for the nunc pro tunc correction of its written judgment. The judgment reads: “Court fines defendant on Count I and $100 on Count II.” The trial court on remand should insert the figure “$100” after the word “defendant.”

As amended, the judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).