Case ID: nj_5/html/0434-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HUDSON & MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL., PROSECUTORS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Argued October 2, 1950
    Decided October 23, 1950.
    
      Mr. John Warren argued the cause for the appellants (ilir. Aaron A. Melniher, Messrs. Carpenter, Gilmour <& Dwyer, Mr. Nicholas S. Bago and Mr. Sydney L. Jacobs, attorneys').
    
      Mr. Thomas J. Brogan argued the cause for the respondent '(Mr. John B. Graf, attorney).
   Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Jacobs in the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

For affirmance—Chief Justice Vandebbilt, and Justices Case, Heíiee, Oliehant, 'Wachenebld, Bubling and Ackebson—7.

For reversal—Hone.