Case ID: f-appx_97/html/0802-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Daryl MCDONALD, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-10436.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted May 11, 2004.
    
    Decided May 27, 2004.
    Edward Torpoco, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for PlaintiffAppellee.
    Mark D. Eibert, Half Moon Bay, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: O’SCANNLAIN, SILER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
    
      
       The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.
    
   ORDER

McDonald has completed the entirety of his sentence and has established no collateral consequences — stigmatic or otherwise — sufficient to maintain the appeal. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998).

DISMISSED AS MOOT. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.