Case ID: so2d_172/html/0450-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DADE NEON SIGN & SERVICE and Highway Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Roberto VIDAL and Consolidated Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents.
    No. 33831.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    March 3, 1965.
    McDonald & McDonald, Miami, for petitioners and cross-respondent.
    Gerald Shapiro, Miami, for respondent and cross-petitioner.
    Howard N. Pelzner, Miami, for Consolidated Mut. Ins. Co., respondent.
    Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission hearing date September 8, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.