Case ID: wis_148/html/0290-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Marshall, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Spellum, Respondent, vs. La Crosse & Southeastern Railway Company, Appellant.
    
      January 13
    
    January 30, 1912.
    
    Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Vernon county: E. C. Higbee, Circuit Judge.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    Action to recover compensation on account of taking lands for railway right-of-way purposes. The cause was submitted to the jury on the evidence, resulting in a verdict in plaintiff’s favor upon which judgment was rendered.
    For the appellant there was a brief by ~Wm. S. Burroughs and Chas. W. Gh-aves, and oral argument by Mr. Burroughs.
    
    For the respondent there was a brief by TV. F. & A. C. Wolfe, and oral argument by TV. F. Wolfe.
    
   Marshall, J.

The same points are raised in this case as in Hauge v. La Crosse & Southeastern R. Co., ante, p. 288. The circumstances in the two cases being alike, the judgment must be affirmed for th& reasoning stated for affirming that in the other case.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.