Case ID: la-ann_26/html/0187-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WxLt, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 5106.
    Succession of William Richardson — Opposition of Elizabeth McQueen et al.
    It is not necessary that tlie appellant should sign the appeal bond} but an appeal granted to Elizabeth McQueen and others can not be perfected by an appeal bond signed by M. McQueen, as principal, and C. B. Austin, as security. The surety of M. McQueen can not be regarded as the surety of Elizabeth McQueen.
    Appeal from th:- Parish Court, parish of East Feliciana. Haralson,, J.
    
      WiohUffe, Fisher & Lealce, for administrator and appellee* Adams, Kernon & Lyons, for opponents and appellants.
   WxLt, J.

The motion to dismiss this appeal because the opponents, who are the appellants, have not given bond, must prevail. The only bond we find in the record is subscribed by M. McQueen, as principal, and Charles B. Austin, as security.

It is not necessary that the appellant should sign the appeal bond; but an appeal granted to Elizabeth McQueen and others can not be perfected by an appeal bond signed by M. McQueen, as principal, and Charles B. Austin, as security. The surety of M. McQueen can not be regarded as the surety of Elizabeth McQueen.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed at the costs of the appellants.