Case ID: sw2d_871/html/0138-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sidney B. MORICE, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Robert N. MORICE, Respondent/Appellant.
    No. 63963.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    March 1, 1994.
    John M. Mellroy and David Hamilton Ash, Mcllroy & Millan, Bowling Green, for respondent/appellant.
    William E. Albrecht, Private Atty., St. Louis, for petitioner/respondent.
    Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals the trial court’s modification of the support payments portion of a dissolution decree. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).