Case ID: nys_119/html/1133-10.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LUNESCHLOSS v. ROTHSCHILD.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    December 22, 1909.)
    Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District. Action -by Edgar Luneschloss against Jacob Rothschild. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
    Reversed, and new trial ordered.
    Daniel F. Cohalan, for appellant.
    Weinberg Brothers, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment was clearly against the weight of the evidence. In the letter of May 7, 1907, to the Metropole Construction Company, it is stated that the work was done on the order of Mr. Livingston, not of the defendant, as the witness Smith testified upon the trial. The attempted explanation by this witness as to why such statement was made, and what part Livingston took in the transaction, is not clear, and does not account for the contradiction. The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.