Case ID: njl_127/html/0604-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RINBRAND WELL DRILLING CO., INCORPORATED, APPELLANT, v. L. & H. THEATRES, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Submitted October 31, 1941 —
    Decided January 9, 1942.
    For the appellant, Edward A. Eaffer.
    
    For the respondent, Nathan W. Goldberg.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Donges, Hehbr, Perskie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.