Case ID: so3d_273/html/0189-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THOMAS MACHINERY, INC., Petitioner, v. AINSWORTH INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Respondent.
    No. 3D19-0013
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed May 1, 2019
    Zebersky Payne Shaw Lewenz, LLP, and Jordan A. Shaw and Kimberly A. Slaven (Fort Lauderdale), for petitioner.
    Joseph E. Altschul, LLC, and Joseph E. Altschul and Alexandria L. Beaton (Pembroke Pines), for respondent.
    Before LOGUE, SCALES and HENDON, JJ.
    ON MOTION TO DISMISS
   PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, defendant below, Thomas Machinery, Inc., seeks certiorari review of a non-final order of the trial court denying Petitioner's motion for leave to file an amended answer and affirmative defenses. We grant Respondent's motion to dismiss the petition because we lack certiorari jurisdiction to review the subject order; any error in denying Petitioner's leave to amend its pleadings is reviewable on plenary appeal. Harry Pepper & Assocs., Inc. v. City of Cape Coral, 369 So.2d 969, 970 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Petition dismissed.