Case ID: nc_5/html/0038-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      By the Court.—\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Elizabeth Wynne vs. Mishaw Always.
    
    Appeal to Newbern Superior Court, on a guardianship. r¡r,j(e questions reserved for the opinion of this court were « Whether the choice of a guardian made by a person between the ages of fourteen and twenty-one years, is absolute so as to preclude the exorcise of the judgment of the county court, on any point not relative to the security to be given?” If this question be determined in the negative “ Whether the court, who rejects the choice, is not to give leave to the minor to nominate a more proper person ?” or « Whether the court may not appoint the person to them most proper?”
    If the court are of opinion, that the county court may appoint without regarding the choice of the infant, or offering him a second nomination, the judgment to be for the defendant, otherwise for the plaintiff.
   By the Court.—

Guardianship in socage departed with tenure in socage. The court is uot bound to appoint the next ®f bin, or the person chosen by a minor $b,ove fourteen years of age ; but by virtue of the act of assembly may and ought, to appoint that person who, in their discretion, they believe will best execute the duties of the appointment.