Case ID: liquor-tax-rep_3/html/0061-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Second Appellate Department,
    December, 1902.
    Reported. 77 App. Div. 644.
    In the Matter of the Petition of Patrick W. Cullinan, as State Commissioner of Excise, for an Order Revoking and Cancelling Liquor Tax Certificate No. 21.361, Issued to Charles C.. WlSSEL.
    
      Clarence Edwards, for appellant.
    The proof did not substantiate the allegations, as it applied to another place than that alleged. (Matter of Lyman, 163 N. Y. 536.)
    The certificate sought to be revoked was posted in Pavilion-No. 1, instead of Pavilion No. 2 as alleged. Any violations proven were committed at the former place.
    W. C. Tan Loon, for respondent.
    The testimony of the special agents established that the law was violated at the place for which the certificate was issued, no-matter how designated. The certificate holder is liable for acts of his agents there. (Kinzel v. Malone, 28 Misc. 622; Matter of Lyman v. Texter, 59 App. Div. 217; Matter of Lyman v. Veeder, 29 Misc. 524.)
   Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. All concurred.