Case ID: okla_130/html/0258-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HUNT, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

McKown v. McDonald.
    No. 18434.
    Opinion Filed May 1, 1928.
    (Syllabus.)
    Quieting Title — Bight .to Damages — Necessary Expenditures for Removal of CIoudL
    The judgment of the trial court is affirmed upon authority of No. 18426, McKown v. Haught, this day decided (130 Okla. 256).
    Note.- — See 32 Cyc. pp. 1374 (Anno), 1381.
    Error from Superior Court, Pottawatomie County; Leander G. Pitman, Judge.
    Action by Mary McDonald against Omer McKown. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
    Affirmed.
    Goode & Dierker, for plaintiff in error.
    Park Wyatt and S. F. Bailey, for defendant in error.
   HUNT, J.

The identical question here presented was involved in 18426, Omer Me-Kown v. Sherman Haught, this day decided (130 Okla. 156), and by stipulation of the parties these cases were submitted on the same briefs. We have examined the record in the instant case, and find ample evidence to support the findings of the trial court andt the judgment rendered thereon. The decision in McKown v. Haught, supra, is therefore controlling here, and, upon authority of that case, it is ordered that the judgment therein be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

MASON, Y. O. J., and HARRISON, LESTER, CLARK, and RILEY, JJ., concur.