Case ID: ad2d_267/html/0060-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joel Jimenez, Appellant.
    [700 NYS2d 123]
   —Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard Fried, J.), rendered June 23, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 22V2 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Although it is undisputed that the deceased was killed by nine millimeter bullets fired from a nine millimeter pistol, the court properly received in evidence .380 caliber ammunition recovered from defendant’s bedroom one week after the shooting. A ballistics expert testified that .380 caliber ammunition, while not ideally suited for such purpose, could be discharged from a nine millimeter pistol (see, People v Mirenda, 23 NY2d 439, 453; People v Del Vermo, 192 NY 470, 478-482; People v Matias, 112 AD2d 897, affd 67 NY2d 1032). This evidence was admissible as tending to prove defendant’s possession of a nine millimeter pistol around the time of the incident, and, therefore, his identity as the perpetrator, and its probative value outweighed any prejudicial effect. We note that the court gave limiting instructions and the jury was never asked to consider this evidence as demonstrating a propensity to commit crimes. In any event, were we to find that the court erred in admitting the ammunition, we would find such error to be harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt, including the testimony of two eyewitnesses, one of whom was acquainted with defendant. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.