Case ID: f3d_772/html/1183-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "THOMAS, Chief Judge:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES ex rel. Steven J. HARTPENCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KINETIC CONCEPTS, INC.; KCI-USA, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. United States ex rel. Geraldine Godecke, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.; KCI-USA, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
    Nos. 12-55396, 12-56117.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Dec. 3, 2014.
    Michael A. Hirst, Hirst Law Group PC, Davis, CA, Mark Irving Labaton, Esquire, Isaacs Friedberg & Labaton, Los Angeles, CA, Patrick J. O’Connell, Andrea Dawn Rose, Jan Soifer, O’Connell & Soifer LLP, Austin, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Christopher G. Oprison, Esquire, Colin V. Ram, Maya P. Florence, Counsel, Gregory M. Luce, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Washington, DC, Matthew E. Sloan, Esquire, Counsel, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for DefendantsAppellees.
    D.C. No. 2:08-cv-01885-GHK-AGR, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-06403-GHK-AGR.
   ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3.