Case ID: nys_131/html/1141-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

REX, Respondent, v. CONEY ISLAND & B. R. CO., Appellant, et al.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    October 20, 1911.)
    Action by Herbert Rex, an infant, etc., against the Coney Island & Brooklyn Railroad Company, impleaded with others.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

JENKS, P. J„ and HIRSCHBERG, J., dissent, upon the ground that, having reversed the judgment against the Long Island Railroad Company for reasons stated in the per curiam opinion, they deem it wiser to have a new trial as to both defendants. See, also, 131 N. Y. Supp, 326.