Case ID: so2d_605/html/1353-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "CALOGERO, C.J., and DENNIS, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Louisiana v. Patricia VAN WINKLE.
    No. 92-KK-2832.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Oct. 28, 1992.
   In re Van Winkle, Patricia; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 92-KW-0942; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “O”, No. 91-3400.

Stay order denied. Writ denied.

CALOGERO, C.J., and DENNIS, J.,

concur in the denial but point out that, under La.C.Cr.P. art. 719, the state is required to turn over not only exculpatory evidence but all results or reports of examinations or experiments which the state, within reasonable foreseeability, intends to use at trial. “Results” includes written and unwritten results, provided that such material falls within this definition of “intended for use at trial.”