Case ID: f-appx_694/html/0210-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles F. STANSBURY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Honorable Stephen M. WALDRON; Honorable Yolanda L. Curtain; Lisa Hyle Marts; Honorable Angela M. Eaves; Eric P. MacDonnell, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 17-1033
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 20, 2017
    Decided: August 9, 2017
    Charles F. Stansbury, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles F. Stansbury, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief.on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of Stansbury’s claim that Defendant Lisa Hyle Marts fabricated evidence because Stansbury failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012); Bell Atl. Corp, v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 570, 127 S.Ct, 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007); see also Thomas v. Salvation Army S. Territory, 841 F.3d 632, 638 (4th Cir. 2016) (stating we may “affirm the district court on alternate grounds”). We affirm the dismissal of the remaining claims for the reasons stated by the district court. Stansbury v. Waldron, No. 1:16-cv-03888-GLR, 2016 WL 7338430 (D. Md. Dec. 19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED