Case ID: ad_277/html/1088-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Amy Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Reta E. Wendt, Appellant, and Samuel T. Pascuzzi et al., Respondents.
   Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: The cause of action alleged in the answer against the defendant-appellant is erroneously labeled as a counterclaim. However, it does not state an affirmative cause of action against the defendant-appellant which should not be stricken on motion. When the facts are developed at the trial, if the plaintiff is successful, the court may then determine whether or not defendants-respondents are entitled to the relief asked for against the defendant-appellant. All concur. (Appeal from an order denying a motion to strike out part of an answer which asked affirmative relief against a codefendant.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.