Case ID: nys_149/html/1115-08.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES ASPHALT REFINING CO. v. TEXAS CO.
    (No. 6190.)
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    October 23, 1914.)
    Appeal from Special Term, New York County. Action by the United States Asphalt Refining Company against the Texas Company. From an order requiring a bill of particulars, defendant appeals. Modified and affirmed. See, also, 149 N. Y. Supp. 1115. (uy Stevens, of New York City, and James L. Nesbitt, of Brooklyn, for, appellant. Jacob Newman, of New York City (Nathan Ballin, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from should be modified as follows: Under the heading "As to the First Defense," in the first paragraph, after the words "for the resale of distillate," insert "of same grade and quality as sample referred to in the contract between the parties." In the second paragraph, strike out the last clause, "If said offers were made in writing, that the defendant annex copies of such written offers." Strike out the fourth paragraph. Under the heading "As to the Second Separate Defense," strike out the second paragraph. Under the heading, "As to the First Counterclaim," strike out the words "and if said offers were made in writing, that the defendant annex copies of said written offers thgreto." As so modified, the order should be affirmed, without costs.