Case ID: f-appx_3/html/0054-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stanley SPITZER; Rose Spitzer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TRANS UNION, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 00-2079.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 29, 2000.
    Decided Feb. 7, 2001.
    Stanley Spitzer, Rose Spitzer, pro se. Keith Man Williams, Greenville, NC; Bruce S. Luckman, Satzberg, Trichon, Kogan & Wertheimer, Philadelphia, PA, for appellee.
    Before WILKINS, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Stanley and Rose Spitzer appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging violations of the Fair Credit Report Act. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Spitzer v. Trans Union, LLC, 140 F.Supp.2d 562 (E.D.N.C.2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.