Case ID: njl_45/html/0184-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HENRY G. WAGONER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. CATHERINE WATTS, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    In error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Supreme Court, see 15 Vroom 126.
    For the plaintiff in error, John Schomp.
    
    For the defendant in error, R. V. Lindabury.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the court below should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Knapp, Reed, Scudder, Cole, Green, Kirk, Paterson, Whitaker. 11.

For reversal — None.