Case ID: so2d_626/html/0184-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John C. THOM, III, etc., Petitioner, v. Sybil McADAM, Respondent.
    No. 81378.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Sept. 30, 1993.
    Rehearing Denied Nov. 17, 1993.
    Marguerite H. Davis and Alan Harrison Brents, Katz, Kutter, Haigler, Alderman, Davis & Marks, P.A., Tallahassee, and Terry S. Bienstock and Hector R. Rivera, Bien-stock & Clark, Miami, for petitioner.
    Sam Daniels and Robert M. Sondak, Paul, Landy, Beiley & Harper, P.A., Miami, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review McAdam v. Thom, 610 So.2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), based on express and direct conflict with Waite v. Waite, 618 So.2d 1360 (Fla.1993). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The opinion below is quashed, and this cause is remanded for reconsideration in light of Waite. The nonconflict issues will not be addressed at this time.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.