Case ID: ga-app_7/html/0645-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Hill, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

2225.
    Swift Creek Distilling Company v. Laval.
    Complaint; from city court of Macon — Judge Hodges. September 18, 1909.
    Argued December 20, 1909.
    Decided April 19, 1910.
    
      Boland Bilis, for plaintiff in error.
    
      B. Douglas Feagin, Hunter A. Qibbs, contra.
   Hill, C. J.

1. The suit was based on an express contract, and was to recover the value of services rendered thereon. The allegations of the petition were not indefinite, vague, or uncertain, but plainly and fully set forth a cause of action, and none of the grounds of demurrer contain any merit.

2. ,N° error of law appears; the court fully, fairly and correctly submitted the law applicable to the issues, and there is some evidence to support the verdict. Judgment affirmed.