Case ID: njl_110/html/0012-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JAMES C. SAPIENZA, INCORPORATED, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT (RESPONDENT BELOW), v. ALEXANDER J. MILMOE, Sr., RESPONDENT (APPELLANT BELOW).
    Submitted October 28, 1932
    Decided January 5, 1933.
    Ror the appellant (respondent below), Milton M. Unger.
    
    Ror the respondent (appellant below), Koehler & Augenbliclc.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 135.

For affirmance — -The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.