Case ID: sw3d_383/html/0471-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Derrick CARTER, Appellant, v. ELITE TITLE COMPANY and CitiMortgage, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. ED 98074.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Nov. 6, 2012.
    Kevin J. Dolley, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    John J. Sehoemehl, St. Louis, Mo, for respondent.
    Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J. and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Derrick Carter (Carter) appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of CitiMortgage Inc., (CMI) on his claim for breach of contract.

Carter raises three points on appeal. He contends the trial court erred in granting CMI’s motion for summary judgment because: 1) Carter’s claim was not barred by the statute of limitations, 2) Carter was a third party beneficiary of the contract between CMI and Elite, and 3) CMI breached its duty to cause a closing protection letter to be provided to the title insurance underwriter. We find no error and affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).