Case ID: so2d_574/html/0313-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard L. NEUBAUER, Jr., Appellant, v. Sylva O. NEUBAUER, Appellee.
    Nos. 90-1820, 90-1821, 90-2403.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Feb. 19, 1991.
    
      George C. Vogelsang and Beth Tyler Vo-gelsang, Miami, for appellant.
    Suarez & Gary, Ruiz & Chesrow, and George W. Chesrow, Coral Gables, for ap-pellee.
    Before NESBITT, JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The final judgment of dissolution of marriage, the order clarifying the final judgment of dissolution of marriage, and the order denying the husband’s exceptions to the General Master’s report dated November 29, 1989, are affirmed. The affirmance is without prejudice to the husband allowing him to seek retroactive modification if he can demonstrate compliance with the standard enunciated in Reep v. Reep, 565 So.2d 814 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).