Case ID: f-appx_228/html/0725-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Efren ROSALES-ROSALES, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-30091.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 16, 2007 .
    Filed April 18, 2007.
    Josh Van De Wetering, USMI—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Missoula, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Cynthia K. Smith, Esq., Smith Law Offices, P.C., Missoula, MT, for Defendants Appellant.
    Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Efren Rosales-Rosales appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 168-month sentence imposed for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) & 846.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Rosales-Rosales’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.