Case ID: se2d_783/html/0733-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dana Marie RIBELIN (f/k/a Creel) v. Phillip Ray CREEL.
    No. 112A15.
    Supreme Court of North Carolina.
    April 15, 2016.
    Arlaine Rockey, Marshall, for plaintiff-appellant.
    Kip D. Nelson, Greensboro, for defendant-appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.