Case ID: nys_66/html/1131-08.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FUCHS v. AARONSOHN.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    November 7, 1900.)
    Action by Louis Fuchs against Harris Aaronsohn. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
    Affirmed.
    J. H. Wood, for appellant. I. Marks, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff’s claim was-that at the time of the action the defendant wrongfully detained the chattels in question. The evidence showed that there was no wrongful detention, and therefore the judgment awarding the chattels to the defendant was proper. The defendant, not having unlawfully detained the property, was entitled to recover, and, as he had been deprived of the property, it was proper that it should be restored to him, or that he should have its value. Judgment affirmed, with costs.