Case ID: ohio-st-3d_98/html/1569-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Report of the Commission on Continuing Legal Education. Helen Bransztet Mikus (# 0012343), Respondent.
   ENTRY

This matter originated in this court on the filing of reports by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “commission”) pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(A)(1)(b) and (A)(2)(d). The commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education, for the 1997-1998 and 1999-2000 reporting periods.

On January 20, 2000, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(B)(3), this court entered an order adopting the recommendation of the commission found in its report regarding the 1997-1998 reporting period and imposing a fee sanction upon the respondent. On April 5, 2002, this court entered an order adopting the commission’s recommendation related to the 1999-2000 reporting period, suspending the respondent from the practice of law and imposing a fee sanction upon the respondent.

On April 10, 2003, the commission filed a motion to vacate, requesting that the orders of January 20, 2000, and April 5, 2002, pertaining to the above-named respondent, be vacated. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to vacate be, and is hereby, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the orders of January 20, 2000, and April 5, 2002, are hereby vacated, and these matters are dismissed.