Case ID: ohio-st_127/html/0038-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The Central United National Bank of Cleveland v. Hendler et al.
    (No. 23998
    Decided June 7, 1933.)
    
      Messrs. Néedham & Smith and Messrs. Fuerst & Brown, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Messrs. Becherman, Booth & Gordon and Mr. William W. Rosensweig, for defendants in error.
   It appearing that the judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of this case (the court now being constituted of but six judges) and are for that reason unable to agree upon a judgment, and the entry of that fact constituting an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, it is ordered that the defendants in error recover from plaintiff in error their costs herein expended.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Í)ay and Jones, JJ., concur.