Case ID: ga_115/html/0763-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Cobb, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Smith v. Hearn.
    Submitted May 1,
    Decided June 11, 1902.
    Complaint. Before Judge Hodnett. City court of Carrollton. October 21, 1901.
    
      Oscar Beese and G. P. Gordon, for plaintiff.
    
      W. JD. Hamrick, for defendant.
   Cobb, J.

There was no error in the rulings on evidence which were complained of, nor in the charges which were assigned as error. The request to charge, so far as legal and pertinent, was covered hy the general charge, which fairly submitted the issue to the jury. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.