Case ID: ind_18/html/0345-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Williams v. Williams and Another.
    The proceedings upon a guardian’s petition for the sale of real estate of his ward are ex parte in their character, and hence a suit will not lie by the ward to review a judgment rendered therein.
    APPEAL from the Johnson Common Pleas.
    
      S. P. Oyler, D. W. Howe and J. H. Williams, for the appellant.
    
      G. M. Overstreet and A. B. Hunter, for the appellee.
   Per Curiam.

“The proceedings upon a guardian’s petition for the sale of the real estate of his ward are exparte in their character, and hence a suit will not lie by the ward to review a judgment rendered therein.” Davidson v. Lindsay, 16 Ind. 186.

The judgment below is reversed with costs, and the cause remanded.