Case ID: wash_20/html/0715-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 3191.
    Decided January 21, 1899.]
    Lucy A. Boardman et al., Appellants, v. City of Spokane et al., Respondents.
    
    Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County.—Hon William E. Richardson, Judge.
    Affirmed.
    
      Lewis & Lewis, for appellants.
    A. G. Avery, for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The allegations of error in this case are (1) That a writ of review was not the proper remedy; and (2) that even though the writ was a proper one, the record did not show such a state of facts as under the law would entitle the plaintiffs to any relief.

Without passing on the first proposition, we are satisfied that under the law as announced by a long line of recent decisions on the subject of street assessments, the judgment in this case was correct. It will, therefore, be affirmed.