Case ID: ny-2d_13/html/1102-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Claim of Henry Roettinger, Respondent, v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
    Argued November 20, 1963;
    decided December 30, 1963.
    
      
      Gerard L. Peace and Urban S. Mulvehili for appellants,
    
      Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Harry Rackow, Paxton Blair and Darnel Polansky of counsel), for Workmen’s Compensation Board, respondent.
    No appearance for claimant-respondent.
   Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke, Foster and Scileppi. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the ground that there is no substantial evidence that the award is based on any occupational disease.