Case ID: sw2d_941/html/0530-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carl HEIDBRINK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 70251.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Jan. 7, 1997.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 17, 1997.
    Application to Transfer Denied April 29, 1997.
    Nancy L. Vincent, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Carl Heidbrink, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Warren County denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the decision of the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).