Case ID: f-appx_517/html/0168-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Allen HOWELL, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 12-7670.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 25, 2013.
    Decided: April 4, 2013.
    Paul K. Sun, Jr., Ellis & Winters, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Yvonne V. Watford-McKinney, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mark Allen Howell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion as untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Howell, No. 4:08-cr-00041-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 4, 2012); cf. Lo v. Endicott, 506 F.3d 572, 575 (7th Cir.2007); E.J.R.E. v. United States, 453 F.3d 1094, 1098 (8th Cir.2006); Shannon v. Newland, 410 F.3d 1083, 1089 (9th Cir.2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.