Case ID: f-appx_367/html/0404-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edward Sabari BRYAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SCDC; Jonathan E. OZMINT, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 09-7953.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 18, 2010.
    Decided: Feb. 25, 2010.
    Edward Sabari Bryan, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Blaine Rosbrugh, Davidson & Lindemann, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edward Sabari Bryan appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment for the Defendants on Bryan’s action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bryan v. SCDC, No. 3:08-cv-00846-RBH, 2009 WL 3166632 (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2009). Additionally, we deny Bryan’s motions to compel and for production of a transcript. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.