Case ID: so2d_319/html/0098-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. WALDEN, Chief Judge", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

F. Donald WING and Thomas H. Daly, Appellants, v. NORTON COMPANY, Appellee.
    No. 75-359.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Sept. 26, 1975.
    Paul B. Erickson, of Alley, Maass, Rogers, Lindsay & Chauncey, Palm Beach, for appellant-Wing.
    Earl L. Maxwell, Jr., of Farish & Farish, West Palm Beach, for appellant-Daly.
    Will A. Nason, Nason, Gildan & Yeager, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CROSS and OWEN, JJ., concur.

WALDEN, C. J., dissents with opinion.

WALDEN, Chief Judge

(dissenting):

Under the facts of this case it is my opinion that Norton Company was involved with interstate and intrastate transactions so that the state is empowered to require Norton to qualify to do business. I would reverse upon authority of Eli Lilly and Company v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc., 366 U.S. 276, 81 S.Ct. 1316, 6 L.Ed.2d 288 (1961).

I do, therefore, dissent.