Case ID: njl_64/html/0364-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MARY EIBEL ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. AUGUSTE VON FELL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted December 12, 1899
    Decided March 5, 1900.
    On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Supreme Court, see 34 Vroom 3.
    For the plaintiff in error, McEwan & McEwan.
    
    For the defendants in error, Warren Dixon.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in that court.

For affirmance—Depue, Van Syckel, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Nixon, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh. 10.

For reversal—None.