Case ID: ohio-st-3d_124/html/1220-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Disciplinary Counsel v. Margolis.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Margolis, 124 Ohio St.3d 1220, 2010-Ohio-1049.]
    (No. 2006-2331
    Submitted February 25, 2010
    Decided March 4, 2010.)
   {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Loren Jonathan Margolis, Attorney Registration No. 0007957, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 18, 2007, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Margolis, 114 Ohio St.3d 165, 2007-Ohio-3607, 870 N.E.2d 1158.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.