Case ID: ohio-st-3d_68/html/0545-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Findlay/Hancock County Bar Association v. Higgins.
    [Cite as Findlay/Hancock Cty. Bar Assn. v. Higgins (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 545.]
    (No. 93-2205
    Submitted December 15, 1993
    Decided March 30, 1994.)
    
      
      Bernard K. Bauer and Robert B. Hollister, for relator.
    
      Michael Jilek, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, we order that respondent be publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright and Resnick, JJ., concur.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents and would suspend respondent from the practice of law for six months.

Pfeifer, J., dissents and would suspend respondent from the practice of law for six months, but would stay the suspension and place respondent on probation.