Case ID: f-appx_424/html/0193-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rennie Otis PRICE, a/k/a Ronnie Otis Price, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-6892.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 14, 2010.
    Decided: Jan. 20, 2010.
    Rennie Otis Price, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher John Romano, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rennie Otis Price appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. Price argues that he should have received a lower sentence after application of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). This claim is without merit. See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 251-53 (4th Cir.) (holding that Booker does not apply in § 3582 proceedings), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 2401, 173 L.Ed.2d 1296 (2009). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.