Case ID: ohio-st-3d_9/html/0083-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Columbus Bar Association v. Cohodes.
    [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Cohodes (1984), 9 Ohio St. 3d 83.]
    (D.D. No. 83-18
    Decided January 25, 1984.)
    
      
      Mr. J. Raymond Prohaska and Mr. Ira 0. Kane, for relator.
    
      Mr. Harold E. Wonnell, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

After a careful review of the evidence, this court finds that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(1), (3), (4), (5), and (6), DR 9-102, DR 9-102(B)(3), and DR 9-102(B)(4) of the Code of Professional Responsibility and concurs with the recommendation of the board.

It is the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.