Case ID: nys_156/html/1127-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HIRSH & SCHOFIELD, Inc., v. GUSMER.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    December 10, 1915.)
    Appeal from Special Term, New York County. Action by Hirsh & Schofield, Incorporated, against Aage Gusmer. From an order denying a motion for the continuance of a temporary injunction pendente lite, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. See, also, 155 N. Y. Supp. 1113.
   PER CURIAM.

Without determining whether or not the plaintiff would be entitled to an injunction by final judgment after a trial of the action, we think the court was justified in refusing to continue the temporary injunction. The order appealed from is therefore affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.