Case ID: fla_141/html/0859-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Clara Harrison v. Richter Jewelry Company
    194 So. 218
    Division A
    Opinion Filed February 20, 1940
    
      Van C. Swearingen, for Plaintiff in Error;
    
      Herbert U. Feibelman and W. H. Burwell, for Defendant in Error.
   Per Curiam.

AVrit of error was sued out to judgment on demurrer to an amended declaration although at the time of the judgment the plaintiff had filed a second amended declaration for the evident purpose of confessing error under rule 40 of the common law rules. In this situation the entry of the judgment on the demurrer to the first amended declaration' was error.

Reversed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Ct-iapman, J., concurs in' opinion and judgment.

Justices Whitfield and Brown not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.