Case ID: ga-app_21/html/0747-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

8477.
    Herring v. Southern States Phosphate and Fertilizer Company.
    Decided February 7, 1918.
    • Complaint; from city court of Bainbridge — Judge Spooner. January 29, 1917.
    
      T. 8. Hawes,' for plaintiff in error.
    
      Hartsfield & Conger, William H. Fleming, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

1. When considered in connection with the entire charge of the court, there is not, in the excerpts complained of in the motion for a new trial, sufficient' error to authorize a reversal.- Mere inaccuracies of expression, or slight errors which are not likely to obscure the meaning of the court or mislead the jury, will not authorize this court to set aside a verdict, where the charge is otherwise correct.

2. There was evidence to support the verdict, and the court properly refused a new trial..

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.