Case ID: nj-eq_78/html/0297-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harvey K. Partridge, receiver, respondent, v. Mechanics National Bank of Burlington, appellant.
    [Argued November 23d, 1910.
    Decided March 6th, 1911.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Walker, whose opinion is reported in 77 N. J. Eq. (7 Buch.) 208.
    
    
      Messrs. Bleakly & Stockwell, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. Ernest Watts, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed for the- reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Walker.

For affirmance — The Chtee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Congdon — 13.

For reversal — None.