Case ID: so3d_81/html/0398-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WINDOM, Judge. KELLUM, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert GILL v. STATE of Alabama.
    CR-10-0051.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    Feb. 4, 2011.
    Rehearing Denied April 22, 2011.
    Certiorari Denied Sept. 9, 2011 Alabama Supreme Court 1100888.
    Robert Gill, pro se.
    Troy King and Luther Strange, attys. gen., and J. Thomas Leverette, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.
   WINDOM, Judge.

AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

WELCH, P.J., concurs. KELLUM, J., concurs specially, with opinion.

KELLUM, Judge,

concurring specially.

I write specially to note that this action appears to be Robert Gill’s eighth Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., petition challenging his 1996 conviction for first-degree robbery and his resulting sentence as a habitual felony offender to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. I believe that allowing Gill to file multiple petitions for postconviction relief in which his claims are either precluded or without merit wastes scarce judicial resources. Therefore, I would encourage the circuit court to consider adopting sanctions like those proposed in Peoples v. State, 531 So.2d 323 (Ala.Crim.App.1988), and Procup v. Strickland, 792 F.2d 1069 (11th Cir.1986), to prevent future frivolous litigation on the part of Gill and other similarly situated inmates. See Ex parte Thompson, 38 So.3d 119 (Ala.Crim.App.2009).