Case ID: nj-eq_93/html/0501-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee-Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Francis Luczak and Helena, his wife, respondents, v. John Mariove and Ilone, his wife, appellants.
    [Decided February 2d, 1922.]
    On-appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Foster, whose opinion is reported in 9® N. J. Eq. 877.
    
    
      Mr. John Q. Frey, for the respondents.
    
      Mr. Otto A. Stiefel, for the appellants.
   Pee-Curiam.

■' The decree appealed- from will be-affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Foster.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, ‘Black, Katzenbach, White, Williams, Gardner, Van Buskirk — 12.

For reversal — None.