Case ID: sw2d_945/html/0048-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James R. BRYAN, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Jo Ann BRYAN, Respondent.
    No. 70556.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    May 6, 1997.
    Todd N. Hendrickson, St. Louis, for petitioner/appellant.
    Timothy H. Battem, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James R. Bryan (Husband) appeals from the trial court’s Judgment and Decree of Dissolution, awarding maintenance to Jo Ann Bryan (Wife). Husband alleges the award is against the weight of the evidence and misapplies the law. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum detailing our reasons for affirming the judgment of the trial court. Rule 84.16(b).