Case ID: f-appx_685/html/0178-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Timothy E. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAMUEL I. WHITE, P.C.; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Defendants-Appellees, and Universal Composition Services, LLC; Altaf U. Khan, Defendants.
    No. 16-1775
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 30, 2017
    Decided: April 12, 2017
    Bernard E. Goodman, David Ludwig, DUNLAP BENNETT & LUDWIG, PLLC, Vienna, Virginia; Roger C. Simmons, Shawn P. Cavenee, Christopher F. deBettencourt, GORDON & SIMMONS, LLC, Frederick, Maryland, for Appellant. Mary C. Zinsner, S. Mohsin Reza, TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Allison Melton, TROUT-MAN SANDERS LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Lisa Hudson Kim, SAMUEL I. WHITE, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before SHEDD and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy E. Davis appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his amended complaint in which he raised numerous claims arising out of the foreclosure on his property. We. have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and find no error in the district court’s dismissal of Davis’ claims. Specifically, we find no merit to Davis’ claims asserting breach of fiduciary duty or breach of contract under Virginia law; nor do we find an actionable claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (2012). Therefore we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Samuel I. White, P.C., No. 1:16-cv-00036-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. June 10, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED