Case ID: so3d_186/html/0617-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

URBIETA OIL, INC., Appellant, v. Vivianna RUIZ, Appellee.
    No. 3D15-704.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 2, 2016.
    
      Duane Morris LLP, Scott D. Kravetz and Richard D. Shane, for appellant.
    Rodier & Rodier and Brian M. Rodier, Hallandale, for appellee.
    Before ROTHENBERG, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Koster v. Sullivan, 160 So.3d 385 (Fla.2015); Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC v. Gibraltar Private Bank & Trust Co., 162 So.3d 1058, 1060 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)(stating “[i]f the return [of service] is regular on its face, then the service of process is presumed to be valid and the party challenging service has the burden of overcoming that presumption by clear and convincing evidence.”)(quoting Koster, 160 So.3d at 389).