Case ID: cust-ct_5/html/0447-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, Judge:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Philip Labe v. United States
    No. 4939.
    Entry Nos. 731518, etc.
    Invoices dated Swatow, China, July 25, 1936, etc.
    Entered at New York, September 9, 1936, etc.
    (Decided June 19, 1940)
    
      Fred Bennett (Harry M. Farrell of counsel) for the plaintiff.
    
      Webster J. Oliver, Assistant Attorney General (William J. Vitale, special attorney), for the defendant.
   Tilson, Judge:

The two appeals listed above have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation, entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties:

That the issue involved in the above-mentioned reappraisement appeals is the same in all material respects as the issue involved in the case of The United States v. Alfred Kohlberg, Inc., Customs Appeal No. 4245, decided January 4, 1940, C. A. D. 88.
That the market value or price at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of China, for exportation to the United States, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States is the appraised value thereof, less the amount added under duress.

That the proper basis of appraisal of the merchandise herein is the export value.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact I find and bold tbe proper dutiable export value of tbe merchandise covered by these appeals to be tbe value found by tbe appraiser, less any amount added under duress. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.