Case ID: ny-2d_28/html/0665-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Decorative Cabinet Corporation. Hyse Realty Corp. et al., Appellants; Lawrence C. Gutman et al., Respondents.
    Argued January 11, 1971;
    decided February 24, 1971.
    
      
      Copal Mints, George Jacobs and Eli Katz for appellants.
    
      Leo H. Raines for Lawrence C. Gutman, respondent.
   Order affirmed, without costs. It is not necessary to consider the applicability of the parol evidence rule because, in any event, the subsequent creditors and purchasers in good faith would not be bound by the undisclosed arrangements among the parties to the lending transactions. Furthermore, petitioner Hyse Realty Corp. was estopped, as Special Term properly found, because of the nondisclosure of such arrangements.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson. Taking no part: Judge Burke.