Case ID: ny_209/html/0606-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Samuel C. Pulis, Respondent, v. Edward A. Schmidt, Appellant.
    
      Pulls v. Schmidt, 146 App. Div. 939, affirmed.
    (Submitted November 34, 1913;
    decided December 9, 1913.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 15, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of ■ defendant.
    
      James B. Henney for appellant.
    
      Eugene L. Parocli and Benjamin F. Schreiber for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett, Cuddeback and Hogan, JJ. Absent: Werner, J. Not sitting: Miller, J.