Case ID: f-appx_686/html/0158-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN RE: Franklin C. SMITH, Petitioner.
    No. 17-1020
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 20, 2017
    Decided: April 25, 2017
    Franklin C. Smith, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Franklin C. Smith petitions for a writ of mandamus compelling Charter One Bank to recognize a power-of-attorney document and to allow Smith access to certain funds, and he has filed a motion to recuse the judges of this court due to an alleged conflict of interest arising from the disposition of a prior, unrelated appeal. With regard to the mandamus petition, Smith presents no evidence that “there are no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires,” such as an ordinary civil suit. See In re Braxton, 258 F.3d 250, 261 (4th Cir. 2001) (internal quotation marks omitted) (setting forth standard for granting writ of mandamus). Furthermore, Smith has not identified any valid grounds for recusal. See 28 U.S.C. § 455 (2012) (listing grounds for recusal).

Accordingly, we deny Smith’s motion to recuse and deny his mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED