Case ID: okla-crim_6/html/0728-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHARLEY OLIVER and E. NICHOLSON v. STATE.
    No. A-1205.
    Opinion Filed January 23, 1912.
    Appeal from Seminole County Court; T. S. Cobb, Judge.
    Charley Oliver and E. Nicholson were convicted of violating the prohibitory law, and appeal.
    Affirmed.
    Crump, Fowler & Skinner, for plaintiffs in error.
    Smith C. Matson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs in error were convicted in the county court of having the possession of intoxicating liquor for the unlawful purpose of sale. Thereafter, on the 13th day of March, Charley Oliver was sentenced to pay a fine of two hundred dollars, and be imprisoned in the county jail for sixty days, and E. Nicholson to pay a fine of one hundred fifty dollars, and be confined in the county jail for a period of thirty days. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiffs in error, and no appearance made for oral argument. The Attorney General has filed a motion to affirm for want of prosecution under rule 4 of this court. The motion is well taken and is sustained. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.