Case ID: ohio-st-3d_29/html/0017-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State, ex rel. Fant, Appellant, v. Sykes, Director of Administrative Services, Appellee.
    [Cite as State, ex rel. Fant, v. Sykes (1987), 29 Ohio St. 3d 17.]
    (No. 86-572
    Decided March 11, 1987.)
    
      
      Henry J. Fant, pro se.
    
    
      Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, and Thomas L. Rosenberg, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Appellant questions the adoption of the referee’s report by the court of appeals inasmuch as the report preceded the actual furnishing of the public record sought herein. Additionally, appellant points to a number of procedural defects at the referee’s level. The questions raised are moot because appellant has been furnished with the public record he is seeking.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the court of appeals granting summary judgment to the appellee, thus denying mandamus relief, is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Douglas, J., concurs in judgment only.