Case ID: so2d_674/html/1310-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "ALMON, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte Betty G. HACKETT. (Re Francis Veto CLARK v. Betty G. HACKETT).
    1950029.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Jan. 12, 1996.
    Charles B. Langham, Decatur, for petitioner.
    Stuart M. Maples and Robert J. Landry III of Johnston, Johnston & Moore, Huntsville, for respondent.
   ALMON, Justice.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for writ of certiora-ri, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

HOOPER, C.J., and HOUSTON, INGRAM, and BUTTS, JJ., concur.