Case ID: f-appx_32/html/0364-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kamal SINGH, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 00-71300.
    INS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted March 11, 2002.
    
    Decided March 19, 2002.
    Before CANBY, BEEZER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Kamal Singh, a native and citizen of Fiji, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s decision finding him removable. We retain jurisdiction to determine whether jurisdiction exists. Aragon-Ayon v. INS, 206 F.3d 847, 849 (9th Cir.2000). Because we conclude that Singh is removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(ii), we dismiss this petition for lack of jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C); Flores-Miramontes v. INS, 212 F.3d 1133, 1135 (9th Cir.2000).

Singh’s motion for stay of removal is denied.

PETITION DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.