Case ID: sw3d_175/html/0688-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cynthia KLOCKE, Appellant, v. SSM HEALTHCARE et al., Respondents.
    No. ED 85519.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Nov. 8, 2005.
    Alvin A. Wolff Jr., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Kim Roger Luther, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cynthia Klocke (“Appellant”) appeals the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Dr. Kurt Kloss, Inphynet Contracting Services, Inc., Dr. Robert Gresick and The Ernst Radiology Clinic on Appellant’s 'wrongful death and lost chance of survival claims. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. The trial court’s judgment was supported by substantial evidence on the record. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the general principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).