Case ID: njl_116/html/0177-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LOUISE HOLLINGSHEAD, BY HER NEXT FRIEND ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. NICODEMUS ZEMKOSKI ET AL., APPELLANTS.
    Submitted October 25, 1935 —
    Decided January 31, 1936.
    For the respondents, Jacob Gold and David, Raskin.
    
    For the appellants, James H. Sanderson and Abraham I. Feltman.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.