Case ID: ohio-st-3d_20/html/0016-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Head.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Head (1985), 20 Ohio St. 3d 16.]
    (D.D. No. 85-22
    Decided October 30, 1985.)
    
      
      Angelo J. Gagliardo, disciplinary counsel, and Carl J. Corletzi, for relator.
    
      Robert D. Head, pro se.
    
   Per Curiam.

Respondent was found guilty of a felony theft offense. Inasmuch as respondent has filed no objection to the recommendation of the board, we agree that the appropriate sanction for such egregious conduct is an indefinite suspension.

Accordingly, we adopt the findings and recommendations of the board and hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law for an indefinite period.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.