Case ID: nys_26/html/1135-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "EHRLICH, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HAY, Respondent, v. MULLER, Appellant.
    (City Court of New York, General Term.
    December 8, 1893.)
    Action by Peter Hay against Rosalie Muller, executrix of the estate of •Gustave Muller, deceased. _
    _ Argued before EHRLICH, O. J., and MCCARTHY, J.
    F. J. Bischoff, for appellant.
    Paul Wilcox, for respondent.
   EHRLICH, C. J.

The complaint sets forth a sufficient cause of action, and the proofs sufficiency established title in the plaintiff, value, demand, and refusal, before suit brought to send the case to the jury. They found on all the issues in favor of the plaintiff. No error was committed to the prejudice of the defendant. The case was fully tried, and intelligently submitted to the jury. The judgment must he affirmed, with costs. ■