Case ID: f_176/html/1023-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WRIGHT et al. v. BLACK.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    February 21, 1910.)
    No. 909.
    In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.
    J. P. Hund-ían and Henry M. Russell, for plaintiffs in error.
    William Erksltine, Benjamin g. Allison, and Edward Kibler, for defendant in error.
    Before PRIT-CHARD, Circuit Judge, and BRAWLEY and CONNOR, District Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

This was an action in assumpsit to recover compensation for personal services. It involved questions of fact that seem to us to have been fairly submitted to the jury, and a careful examination of the record and of the printed arguments submitted fails to satisfy us that any reversible errors were committed on the trial. The judgment of the court below is therefore affirmed.