Case ID: f-appx_670/html/0168-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles LANGHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Lt. R. Wright; Angela Dunbar; Officer Stoots; Officer Malone; Officer Boyd; Physician Assistant Scott; Mr. Duvall, Psychologist; Lieutenant Chase; Tina Scott; Rene Daubon, Defendants-Appellees, and Eric Holder, Attorney General, Defendant.
    No. 16-6252
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: October 18, 2016
    Decided: November 9, 2016
    
      Charles Langham, Appellant Pro Se. Robert J. Dodson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Langham appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants and denying relief on his complaint raising claims pursuant to the Federal Torts Claim Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680 (2012), and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Langham leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we affirm the district court’s order. Langham v. United States, No. 5:14—ct—03143-BO (E.D.N.C. filed Jan. 27, 2016 & entered Jan. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately, presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED