Case ID: ga-app_10/html/0417-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Russell, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

3204.
    Cutts v. Watt-Harley-Holmes Co.
    Decided January 30, 1912.
    Appeal; from Wilcox superior court — Judge Wbipple.
    December 6, 1910.
    
      M. B. Cannon, Max E. Land, for plaintiff in error.
    
      'Hal Lawson, contra.
   Russell, J.

The evidence, though conflicting, supported the verdict rendered, and none of the assignments of error are of sufficient materiality to have required the grant of a new trial. This verdict being the second verdict in behalf of the plaintiff, and being approved by the trial judge, it will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed. Pottle, J., not -presiding.