Case ID: f-appx_207/html/0342-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Andy Alexander TJHANG, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 06-1286.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 27, 2006.
    Decided: Nov. 29, 2006.
    Matthew W. Rau, Law Office of Matthew W. Rau, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondent.
    Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Andy Alexander Tjhang, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider its prior order, which adopted and affirmed the immigration judge’s denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2006); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir.2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Tjhang, No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ] (B.I.A. Feb. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.