Case ID: sw3d_132/html/0338-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Antonio HAYES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 62512.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    May 4, 2004.
    Vanessa Caleb, Kansas City, for Appellant.
    Andrea K. Spillars, Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Andrea M. Follett, Jefferson City, for Respondent.
    Before JOSEPH M. ELLIS, C.J., PATRICIA A. BRECKENRIDGE and THOMAS H. NEWTON, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Antonio Hayes appeals from the judgment of the motion court, which denied his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. For the reasons explained in the memorandum furnished to the parties, we affirm the judgment of the motion court. Rule 84.16(b).