Case ID: f-appx_51/html/0202-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Charles Anthony JOHNSON, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 01-50386.
    D.C. No. CR-98-00918-WDK.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Nov. 18, 2002.
    
    Nov. 22, 2002.
    Before REINHARDT, RYMER, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

C. Anthony Johnson appeals his conviction and sentence following his guilty plea to conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 1029(b)) and three counts of fraudulent use of unauthorized access devices (18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2)). Johnson’s counsel has filed a motion pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating there are no arguable issues for review and seeking to withdraw as counsel of record. Johnson has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues for review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.