Case ID: nw2d_908/html/0299-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SAGINAW EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, Respondent-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee, v. Kathy EADY-MISKIEWICZ, Charging Party-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant.
    Michigan Education Association, Respondent-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee, v. Kathy Eady-Miskiewicz, Charging Party-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant.
    Saginaw Education Association, Respondent-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee, v. Matt Knapp, Charging Party-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant.
    Michigan Education Association, Respondent-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee, v. Matt Knapp, Charging Party-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant.
    Saginaw Education Association, Respondent-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee, v. Jason Laporte, Charging Party-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant.
    Michigan Education Association, Respondent-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee, v. Jason Laporte, Charging Party-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant.
    Saginaw Education Association, Respondent-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee, v. Susan Romska, Charging Party-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant.
    Michigan Education Association, Respondent-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee, v. Susan Romska, Charging Party-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant.
    Standish-Sterling Educational Support Personnel Association MEA/NEA, Respondent-Appellant, v. Mark Norgan, Charging Party-Appellee.
    Grand Blanc Clerical Association and Michigan Education Association, Respondents-Appellants, v. Mary Carr, Charging Party-Appellee.
    Battle Creek Educational Secretaries Association And Michigan Education Association, Respondents-Appellants, v. Alphia Snyder, Charging Party-Appellee.
    COA: 329419 COA: 329425 COA: 329426 COA: 329427 COA: 329428 COA: 329429 COA: 329430 COA: 329431 COA: 331398 COA: 331762 COA: 331875
    Supreme Court of Michigan.
    March 21, 2018
    Order
   On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 2, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.