Case ID: f-appx_220/html/0663-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Louis Gerard GOERES, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC.; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 05-15282.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Feb. 12, 2007.
    Filed Feb. 14, 2007.
    Teresa S. Renaker, Esq., Lewis Feinberg Renaker & Jackson, PC, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Kim Zeldin, Esq., Liner Yankelevitz Sunshine & Regenstreif, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: REINHARDT, RYMER, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
   MEMORANDUM

We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order granting the motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Med. Servs., Inc., — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 1869, 1875, 164 L.Ed.2d 612 (2006), does not undermine the district court’s reasoning and Peralta v. Hispanic Business, Inc., 419 F.3d 1064, 1076 (9th Cir.2005), supports it.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.