Case ID: sw_242/html/1091-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BOYCE, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WISEMAN v. COLLINS.
    (No. 1999.)
    (Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Amarillo.
    June 14, 1922.)
    1. Pleading ®=»8(4)— Plea of failure of consideration should state facts specifically as against a special exception.
    A plea of failure of consideration should as against a special exception state the facts specifically.
    2. Pleading <®=8(4) — Plea of want of consideration in general terms sufficient.
    A plea of want of original consideration in general terms may be sufficient, since the very nature of the plea negatives the existence of anything more specific.
    3. Pleading <S=>93(2) — Plea combining allegations of failure of consideration and want of consideration subject to special exception.
    A defendant cannot combine allegations of failure of consideration and want of consideration in one plea and sustain the pleading against a special exception on the ground of generality and uncertainty.
    Appeal from Hartley County Court; W. R. Slaton, Judge.
    Action between John A. Wiseman and E. S. Collins. From judgment rendered, the former appeals.
    Affirmed.
    R. El Stalcup, .of Dalhart, for appellant.
    Yeale & Lumpkin, of Amarillo, for appel-lee.
   BOYCE, J.

A plea of failure of consideration should, as against a special exception, state the facts specifically. Clifton v. Brundage, 25 Tex. 331; Key v. Hickman (Tex. Civ. App.) 149 S. W. 275; Grimes v. Bricson, 94 Minn. 461, 103 N. W. 334; 4 Enc. of Pldg. & Prac. 950. A plea of want of original consideration in general terms might be sufficient because of the fact that, the very nature of the plea negatives the existence of anything more specific. Grimes v. Ericson, ■94 Minn. 461, 103 N. W. 334. But the pleading of a failure of consideration in effect admits an original consideration, and the defendant could not combine the two allegations in one plea and sustain the pleading against a special exception on account of generality and uncertainty. Appellant’s counsel, we think, misunderstands the meaning of the reference he cites to Townes on Pleading. Judge Townes makes it clear that the plea of want or failure of consideration is a plea of confession and avoidance and that the facts must be specifically pleaded. Townes on Pleading, pp. 540 and 542. Affirmed.