Case ID: ad2d_198/html/0774-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Donna R. Spitz et al., Appellants, v State of New York, Respondent.
    (Claim No. 76965.)
    [605 NYS2d 996]
   —Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The Court of Claims’ factual finding that the highest and best use of the subject properties was for industrial and warehouse purposes is not contrary to the weight of evidence. We perceive no reason to disturb the court’s weighing of expert testimony, especially where, as here, the court’s determination was aided by viewing the properties.

We have reviewed claimants’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Court of Claims, NeMoyer, J. — Appropriation.) Present — Den-man, P. J., Callahan, Balio, Boomer and Boehm, JJ.