Case ID: so2d_616/html/0414-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "OVERTON, Justice. KOGAN, Justice,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael Lenard HALL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 79237.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Dec. 3, 1992.
    Rehearing Denied Feb. 16, 1993.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and Kathleen Stover, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and James W. Rogers, Bureau Chief, and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.
   OVERTON, Justice.

We have for review Hall v. State, 588 So.2d 1089 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), in which the district court certified the same questions we recently answered in the negative in Tillman v. State, 609 So.2d 1295 (Fla.1992). For the reasons expressed in Tillman, we approve the decision of the district court.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, SHAW, GRIMES and HARDING, JJ., concur.

KOGAN, J., dissents with an opinion, in which BARKETT, C.J., concurs.

KOGAN, Justice,

dissenting.

I dissent on the basis of my dissenting opinion in Tillman v. State, 609 So.2d 1295 (Fla.1992). The petitioner has only been convicted of one violent crime and therefore cannot be a habitual violent felony offender.

BARKETT, C.J., concurs.