Case ID: ga_153/html/0128-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Gilbert, J.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NELSON et al. v. MADDOX GROCERY COMPANY.
    A petition by heirs at law, to recover land of one in possession of it and claiming under their ancestor, alleging that their ancestor held title to the land at the time of his death and had devised it to one of his sons, etc., but not alleging that their ancestor died seized and possessed of the land, and not negativing a grant of it by him, was properly dismissed on demurrer.
    No. 2926.
    March 18, 1922.
    Complaint for land. Before Judge R. C. Bell. Decatur superior court. November 4, 1921.
    
      
      W. I. Geer, for plaintiffs.
    
      Hartsfield & Conger and John B. Wilson, for defendant.
   Gilbert, J.

A. L. Nelson et al., as the sole heirs at law of Adam Nelson, brought an action for land against Maddox Grocery Company. The petition alleges, in. substance, that the father of Adam Nelson died in 1872 or 1873, leaving a will, which was duly probated, the third item of which, devising the land in question, was as follows: I give and devise to my son, Adam Nelson, and the heirs of his body, and, in default of said heirs at the time of his death, to my daughter, Delphia,” described land, including the land sued for herein; that the testator held title to the land at the time of his death; that plaintiffs claim fee-simple title under their father, Adam Nelson, who died on April 4, 1915, leaving his wife, who is still in life, and plaintiffs, who are his children; that there has been no administration upon the estate of Adam Nelson; and that the defendant, who is in possession of the land, claims under Adam Nelson. The court sustained a general demurrer to the petition, and the plaintiffs excepted.

The petition contains no allegation that Adam Nelson died seized and possessed of the land in controversjr, nor does it negative a- grant by him. It does allege that the defendant has possession and claims under him. The court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer and in dismissing the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent because of sickness.