Case ID: ad_137/html/0906-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gertrude D. Hawes, Respondent, v. Oliver J. Wells, Appellant, Impleaded with Eliza C. Dunlop and Henry H. Snedeker.
    . Appeal by the defendant Oliver J. Wells from an order entered herein o.n the 2d day of December, 1909, granting plaintiff’s motion to strike out certain portions of the answer of said defendant.
   Per Curiam:

We recently held that this complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute-a cause of action. (See Hawes v. Dunlop, No, 1, 136 App. Div. 629.) Any answer is good enough for a bad complaint. Therefore this answer was good enough. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars Costs. Present — Clarke, McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Order reversed, with tén dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.