Case ID: sw3d_350/html/0065-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harvey ARNOLD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 72396.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Oct. 11, 2011.
    
      Harvey E. Arnold, Appellant pro se.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang and John M. Reeves, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Division Three: JAMES E. WELSH, P.J., JAMES M. SMART, JR., and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Harvey Arnold challenges the .trial court’s denial of his motion to reopen Rule 29.15 post-conviction proceedings. He contends his post-conviction counsel abandoned him by filing an amended post-conviction motion advancing only claims that were either already argued on direct appeal or claims that were restated verbatim from his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).