Case ID: misc_15/html/0694-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Conlan, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas F. McCall, Respondent, v. Emma L. Jacquelin, Appellant.
    ■ Appeal from order denying motion to vacate order- for substituted service. ■
    
      Redfield & Redfield, for appellant.
    
      Michael H. Curran, for respondent.
   Conlan, J.

The order for substituted service was properly made and the requirements of the Code observed. Motion - to vacate was properly denied. • •

Order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Fitzsimons and Botty, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, with costs.