Case ID: so3d_255/html/0815-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nathan J. MACK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 2D18-1183
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Opinion filed September 26, 2018
    Nathan J. Mack, pro se.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Mack v. State, 238 So. 3d 765 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) (table decision); Mack v. State, 197 So. 3d 1241 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (table decision); Mack v. State, 182 So. 3d 649 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (table decision); McDonald v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) ; Doby v. State, 25 So. 3d 598 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; Valdez-Garcia v. State, 965 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ; Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ; Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ; Harris v. State, 777 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) ; Harris v. State, 789 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

SILBERMAN, BADALAMENTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.