Case ID: f-appx_686/html/0833-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DeAngelo COOK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, MACON SP, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 16-15311 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    (April 28, 2017)
    DeAngelo Cook, Pro Se
    Clint Christopher Malcolm, Samuel Scott Olens, Attorney General’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Respondent-Appellee
    Before HULL, WILSON and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

In 2009, De Angelo Cook, a Georgia prisoner, filed a federal habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. That petition was dismissed with prejudice as untimely, and Mr. Cook did not appeal.

In 2016, Mr. Cook filed a second habeas corpus petition. The district court dismissed this petition for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because Mr. Cook had not obtained circuit authorization to file a second or successive petition. Mr. Cook now appeals.

We affirm. Because Mr. Cook did not obtain circuit authorization to file a second or successive habeas petition, the district court did not have jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), (b) (4); Tompkins v. Secretary, 557 F.3d 1257, 1259 (11th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.