Case ID: ny_195/html/0576-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Samuel Shillak, Respondent, v. William Salmon, Appellant.
    
      Shillak v. Salmon, 125 App. Div. 931, affirmed.
    (Submitted April 29, 1909;
    decided May 18, 1909.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 27, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract of sale.
    
      Benjamin G. Pashm and Sydney Bernheim for appellant.
    
      Frederick Wiener and Otto Ilorwitz for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.