Case ID: pa_321/html/0567-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Barnes,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Germantown Trust Company, Guardian, v. Emhardt, Appellant
    (No. 2).
    Argued January 15, 1936.
    Before Kephart, C. J., Schaefer, Maxey, Drew, Linn and Barnes, JJ.
    
      Robert P. Shick, for appellant.
    
      George V. Strong, for appellee.
    April 20, 1936:
   Opinion by

Mr. Justice Barnes,

The principles governing this case are stated in our opinion in Germantown Trust Co., Guardian, v. Emhardt, 321 Pa. 561. The facts of the two cases are almost identical, the only differences being that in this case the plaintiff appears as guardian of the estate of Mary Elizabeth Mareolina, and that the bond and mortgage, which is for a like sum, is secured upon premises 82 West Sharpnaek Street, Philadelphia. The pleadings, except for these factual differences, are identical. However, in this case plaintiff’s rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense was sustained, and judgment entered accordingly. For the reasons given in our opinion at 321 Pa. 561, the judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.