Case ID: tex-crim_114/html/0408-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MORROW, Presiding Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Willie Cotton v. The State.
    No. 13117.
    Delivered March 12, 1930.
    Reported in 25 S. W. (2d) 857.
    The opinion states the case.
    
      C. W. Falvey and W. S. Poston, both of Lufkin, for appellant.
    
      A. A. Dawson of Canton, State’s Attorney, for the State.
   MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Driving an automobile upon the public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor is the offense; punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars.

State’s counsel makes a motion to dismiss the appeal upon the ground, first, that the recognizance does not describe the offense, and second, that the record reveals no sentence. The first ground is overruled. This is a felony case, and the recognizance is deemed sufficient. See Art. 817, C. C. P., 1925. In a felony case, unless the death penalty is assessed, the sentence is essential as a predicate for an appeal. See Art. 709, C. C. P., Vernon’s Ann. Tex. C. C P., 1925, Vol. 3, p. 150; Ridge v. State, 96 Tex. Cr. R. 496; Carlile v. State, 97 Tex. Cr. R. 477.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.