Case ID: so2d_514/html/1013-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James McCONICO, Jr.v. PICKARD AND HUGHES, P.C., et al.
    86-841.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Sept. 25, 1987.
    James McConico, Jr., pro se.
    Robert Wyeth Lee, Jr., of Wininger & Lee, Birmingham, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from the denial of his Rule 60(b), A.R.Civ.P., motion (on the ground of newly discovered evidence of his lawyer’s alleged conflict of interest) to vacate the summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants. We affirm on the authority of McLeod v. McLeod, 473 So.2d 1097 (Ala.Civ.App.1985).

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.