Case ID: nj-eq_85/html/0211-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Wendel Andreas, respondent, v. Hattie Andreas, appellant.
    [Submitted July 5th, 1915.
    Decided November 15th, 1915.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Howell, whose opinion is reported in 84 N. J. Eq. 868.
    
    
      Messrs. McCarter & English, for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. Vredenburgh, Wall & Carey, for the respondent. .
   Per Curiam.

The decree order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reas.ons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Howell.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Vredenburgi-i, I-Iepbeni-ieimer, Williams, Taylor—13.

For reversal—None.