Case ID: njl_65/html/0686-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ANNA M. LORD ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. THE MAYOR, &c., OF BAYONNE, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
    Argued December 3, 1900
    Decided March 4, 1901.
    On error.
    For the plaintiffs in error, Van BuslcirTc & Parker.
    
    For the defendants in error,.James Benny.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by Mr. Justice Dixon in that court. Ante p. 137.

For a-fjirmance—The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Van Syckel, Fort, Garretson, Bogert, Krueger, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees. 11.

For reversal—None.