Case ID: f2d_89/html/1018-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT v. J. N. GILLETT et al.
    No. 8404.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    April 5, 1937.
    Nutter & Rutherford, Philip Cavalero, and Stephen Dietrich, all of Stockton, Cal., for appellant.
    Gillett & Gillett, of Oakland, Cal., Clark, Nichols & Eltse, of Berkeley, Cal., Hugo D. Newhouse, Russell P. Tyler, Peter turn Suden, Richard turn Suden, and Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, all of San Francisco, Cal., and W. Coburn Cook, of Turlock, Cal., for appellees.
    Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of motion of appel-lees to advance cause for hearing, etc., and oral presentation of motion by counsel for opposing parties, ordered motion granted, that a decree of affirmance be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court issue as provided in rule 32.