Case ID: f-appx_638/html/0401-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Johnny COX, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-50633
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    March 11, 2016.
    Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    John Scott Peterson, Waco, TX, for Defendant-Appellant,
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Johnny Cox, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v, California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Cox has not filed a response. Although Cox remains subject to a term of supervised release, he has completed the term of imprisonment imposed upon the revocation of his probation. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivólous issue for appellate • review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw, is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, see United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir.2007). 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5,- the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in ,5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.