Case ID: sw3d_302/html/0729-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael RUCKER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 92746.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Jan. 26, 2010.
    Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Cause Number 05P-4701, Margaret M. Neill, Judge.
    Jo Ann Rotermund, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    
      Chris Koster, Dora A. Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before: KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J, GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J, and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Rucker appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his amended Motion under Rule 29.15 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b). 
      
      . All rule references are to Mo. R.Crira. P.2008, unless otherwise indicated.