Case ID: f-appx_669/html/0814-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles SWIFT, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Wadie THOMAS; Matthew Kahler, Defendants-Appellees
    No. 16-3200
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: October 20, 2016
    Filed: October 21, 2016
    Charles Swift, Pro Se.
    Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Charles Swift appeals after the district court dismissed, without prejudice, his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint requesting that the district court impose directions upon a state-court judge. Upon careful review, and for the reasons stated by the district court, we conclude that the dismissal was proper. See Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal is reviewed de novo).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska,