Case ID: so2d_502/html/0086-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Waitress S. HAILE, Appellant, v. John HAILE, Jr., Appellee.
    No. 4-86-0011.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Feb. 11, 1987.
    Jane Kreusler-Walsh of Klein & Bera-nek, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    William S. Cross of Allsworth, Dumar, Cagel & Curtis, P.A., and Nancy Little Hoffmann of Nancy Little Hoffmann, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

In arriving at the judgment of dissolution of marriage, the trial court did not consider the husband’s pension as a marital asset. At the time of the final hearing the court did not have the benefit of Diffender-fer v. Diffenderfer, 491 So.2d 265 (Fla. 1986).

We reverse those portions of the final judgment relating to alimony and the pension so that they may be reconsidered by the court under Diffenderfer. We make no prejudgment concerning the manner nor extent to which this should alter the final judgment.

With respect to the issue of attorney’s fees, and in all other respects, the final judgment is affirmed.

We therefore reverse in part and remand to the trial court for further proceedings,

DELL, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.