Case ID: f-appx_140/html/0508-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marvin LOVEJOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard CATHCART, State Attorney; Henry D. McMaster, Attorney General for the State of South Carolina; David M. Tatarsky, General Counsel for the South Carolina Department of Corrections; Jon Ozmint, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 05-6416.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted July 27, 2005.
    Decided Aug. 4, 2005.
    Marvin Lovejoy, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Marvin Lovejoy appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lovejoy v. Cathcart, No. CA-04-22155-8-24BI (D.S.C. Feb. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED