Case ID: so2d_314/html/0819-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. A. D. ALEXANDER and Frank Alexander, Appellees.
    No. 74-1326.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 2, 1975.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Mary Jo M. Gallay, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.
    James A. Gardner, Public Defender, Sarasota, and Harold H. Moore, Asst., Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

The above disposition of this appeal is not to be interpreted as ruling out the admissibility of a subsequent, independent identification by the same witnesses. See Hamrick v. Wainwright, 5th Cir. 1972, 465 F.2d 940, and Commonwealth v. Richards, Pa.1974, 327 A.2d 63.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.