Case ID: sw2d_949/html/0682-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Chris and Carol ARMACOST, Respondent, v. REDMOND BUILDING CORPORATION, Appellant.
    No. WD 53779.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Submitted May 7, 1997.
    Decided Aug. 12, 1997.
    John E. Redmond, Kansas City, for appellant.
    Steven H. Mustoe, Kansas City, for respondent.
    Before BERREY, P.J., and SPINDEN and SMART, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Redmond Building Corporation appeals the judgment in a breach of contract case. Having considered the arguments on appeal, the court concludes that the judgment should be affirmed. A published opinion would have no precedential value. A memorandum as to the reasons for the decision has been furnished to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).