Case ID: f-appx_393/html/0074-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ophelia MUNN-GOINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF BLADEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE; Kathryn Geisen, Doctor, in her individual and official capacity; Darrell Page, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 09-2206.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 14, 2010.
    Decided: Aug. 26, 2010.
    
      John W. Gresham, Ferguson, Stein, Chambers, Gresham & Sumter, P.A., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr., William J. McMahon, IV, Robin E. Shea, Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Appellees Board of Trustees of Bladen Community College and Darrell Page moved the Court to reconsider, vacate, and deny appellant Ophelia Munn-Goins’ motion to file reply brief out of time, or to strike appellant’s reply, or for leave to file a sur-reply. We deny appellees’ motion.

Appellant Munn-Goins appeals the district court’s order granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and Munn-Goins’ arguments and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Munn-Goins v. Board of Trustees of Bladen Community College, et al, 658 F.Supp.2d 713 (E.D.N.C. 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.