Case ID: f-appx_279/html/0221-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re: Sean Lamont DUDLEY, a/k/a John D. Brown, Petitioner.
    No. 08-1097.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 22, 2008.
    Decided: May 28, 2008.
    Sean Lamont Dudley, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Sean Lamont Dudley petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking recusal of United States District Court Judge Richard L. Voorhees. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that there are no pending cases or motions in Judge Voorhees’ court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We also deny the motion for stay. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.