Case ID: f-appx_355/html/0094-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stuart Daniel JUAREZ, Appellant, v. LITOW LAW OFFICE, P.C., Appellee.
    No. 09-1019.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 1, 2009.
    Filed: Dec. 9, 2009.
    Stuart Daniel Juarez, Des Moines, IA, pro se.
    Charles L. Litow, Litow Law Office, P.C., Cedar Rapids, IA, for Appellee.
    Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

In this civil suit alleging unfair debt collection practices, Stuart Juarez appeals from the district court’s order (1) denying him permission to file a second amended complaint, and (2) granting summary judgment in favor of Litow Law Office, P.C. After careful review, we affirm. See Popoalii v. Corr. Med. Servs., 512 F.3d 488, 497 (8th Cir.2008) (concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a late-filed motion to amend where the proposed amended complaint contained new theories of recovery); Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir.2006) (reviewing a grant of summary judgment de novo). See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.