Case ID: ga-l-rep_1/html/0352-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Blandford J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Tucker vs. Atlanta Street Railroad.
    Case, from City Court of Atlanta. Charge of Court. New Trial. (Before Judge Clarke)
    W. M. Bray; Hulsey & Bateman, for plaintiff in error.
    Hopkins & Glenn, for defendant.
   Blandford J.

1. There is nothing in the general grounds of the motion for a new trial in this case.

2. Although a charge of the court excepted to, if taken alone, may be objectionable, yet if, when considered, in the light of the whole charge, it,is harmless, it will not constitute an error which will require a reversal.

Judgment affirmed,