Case ID: so2d_604/html/0844-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bradford H. KATZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 91-01264.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 24, 1992.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Elaine L. Thompson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Hollywood, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The appellant pled no contest to charges of possession of cocaine, possession of dia-zepam, and possession of cannabis. On this appeal he raises three issues concerning his plea and the conditions and provisions of the order of probation entered by the trial court. We find merit in only one point.

For the reason stated in Tillman v. State, 592 So.2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), we strike the special condition of probation numbered 6 which prohibits the appellant from using intoxicants to excess and visiting places where intoxicants, drugs or other dangerous substances are unlawfully sold, dispensed or used.

Affirmed as modified.

DANAHY, A.C.J., ALTENBERND, J., and BENTLEY, E. RANDOLPH, Associate Judge, concur.