Case ID: ad_189/html/0886-10.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Philbin, J.:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

First Department,
    October, 1919.
    Edmund Cockayne, an Infant, by Albert Cockayne, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Thomas J. Healey, Appellant.
    Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, hearing date August 26, 1919, and entered in the New York county clerk’s office denying the defendant’s motion for an order directing the service of an amended complaint.
   Philbin, J.:

The plaintiff apparently relies upon two causes of action but fails to separately state and number them. He should be required to serve an amended complaint either separately stating and numbering the alleged causes of action or eliminating the cause of action upon which he does not place reliance. The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted as above indicated, with ten dollars costs. Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Page and M err ell, JJ., concurred. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, to the extent indicated in opinion.