Case ID: cust-ct_61/html/0192-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Rao, Chief Judge:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(C.D. 3562)
    
    E. J. Korvette, Inc. v. United States
    United States Customs Court, Second Division
    (Decided September 17, 1968)
    
      Siegel, Mandell & Davidson for the plaintiff.
    
      Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
    Before Rao and Fokd, Judges
   Rao, Chief Judge:

The merchandise covered by the instant protest consists of wool sweaters which were assessed with duty at the rate of 42.5 per centum ad valorem under item 382.03 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, as women’s, girls’, or infants’ lace or net wearing apparel, whether or not ornamented, and other women’s, girls’, or infants’ wearing apparel, ornamented.

It is claimed in said protest that said sweaters are properly dutiable at the rate of 25.5 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of item 741.50 of said tariff schedules, for articles, not specially provided for, of beads, of bugles, of spangles, of imitation gemstones, or of any combination thereof.

This protest has been submitted for decision upon a written stipulation of counsel for the respective parties hereto which réads as follows:

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States:

That the items marked “A” and cheeked JW (Import Spec’s Initials) by Import Specialist J. Wargo (Import Spec’s Name) on the invoices covered by the protest enumerated above, and assessed with, duty at 42.5 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of Item 382.03, TSUS, consist of wool sweaters, fully covered with beads, bugles or spangles.

That said sweaters are, in fact, in chief value of bugles, beads, or spangles and that the wool fabric is not visible in significant part after the beads, bugles or spangles are applied to the sweater.

It is claimed that said merchandise is properly dutiable at 25.5 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of Item 741.50, TSUS, as articles not specially provided for of beads, of bugles, of spangles, or any combination thereof.

That the protest be deemed submitted on this stipulation, the protest being limited to the items marked with the letter “A”, as aforesaid.

Upon the agreed statement of facts, we hold the merchandise here in question, identified by invoice items marked and checked as aforesaid, to be dutiable at the rate of 25.5 per centum ad valorem, under item 141.50 of said tariff schedules, as articles, not specially provided for, of beads, of bugles, of spangles, of imitation gemstones, or of any combination thereof. The claim in the protest to that effect is sustained. All other claims are, however, overruled.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.