Case ID: ga_189/html/0164-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Jenkins, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hogg et al. v. Housing Authority of the City of Rome.
    No. 13025.
    October 27, 1939.
   Jenkins, Justice.

1. As to the only two essential questions raised in this petition for injunction by “residents, citizens, and taxpayers of the City of Rome, State of Georgia, and of the United States,” against the housing authority of that city, created under the “housing-authorities law” of this State, as amended (Ga. L. 1937, p. 210; Ga. L. 1939, p. 112), this case is determined adversely to the petitioners by the rulings made on these and other questions in Barber v. Housing Authority of Rome, 189 Ga. 155 (5 S. E. 2d, 425).

(a) As to the first question, the alleged invalidity of the resolution by the city commission creating the defendant housing authority, on the ground that there was no previous hearing or investigation of the facts as a basis for the finding that a need for this authority existed (assuming that the petitioners had such an interest as would authorize this attack), it is without merit, for the reasons stated in division 2 of the opinion in the Barber case.

(b) As to the second question, the alleged invalidity of the defendant’s expenditure of Federal funds, the attack fails for the reasons stated in division 4 of the opinion in the Barber case. The fact that there the petitioners were merely owners of the land sought to be condemned by the defendant, while here they proceed as “residents and taxpayers” of the city, State, and United States, would not make the position of the present petitioners any stronger than that of the petitioner in Mass. v. Mellon, 262 U. S. 447 (4), 468-488 (43 Sup. Ct. 597, 67 L. ed. 1078), cited with other decisions in the Barber case, since in the Mellon ease the suit involving Federal funds was also brought by a “Federal taxpayer.”

2. Under these rulings, the court properly dismissed the petition on genera] demurrer and on special demurrers to the essential paragraphs.

Judgment affirmed.

AU the Justices concur.

Maddox & Griffin, for plaintiffs.

Wright cO Willingham, Dean Covington, and Leon Covington, for defendant.