Case ID: ga-app_34/html/0505-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bboyx.es, 0. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

16665.
    Wright v. The State.
    Decided November 10, 1925.
    Conviction of larceny of automobile; from Fulton superior court —Judge Howard. June 6, 1925.
    
      Clark Bay, 0. Glen Bay, W. F. Moore, for plaintiff in error.
    
      John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, Balph H. Pharr, contra.
   Bboyx.es, 0. J.

1. The alleged newly discovered evidence is cumulative and impeaching in its character, and is not such evidence as would likely produce a different verdict upon another trial of the case. Furthermore, the supporting affidavit, as to the residence, associates, etc., of the newly discovered witness, is defective in that it is silent as to his associates. Civil Code (1910), § 6086; Ivey v. State, 154 Ga. 63 (6) (113 S. E. 175).

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., eoneur.