Case ID: f-appx_207/html/0331-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Adonica Q. HULL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BALTIMORE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE; AFSCME 92, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 06-1874.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 21, 2006.
    Decided: Nov. 28, 2006.
    Adonica Q. Hull, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Adonica Q. Hull appeals the district court’s order dismissing as untimely filed her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hull v. Baltimore City Cmty. Coll., No. 1:06-ev-01439-WDQ (D.Md. July 5, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.