Case ID: cust-ct_2/html/0742-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Brown, J. \n      McClelland, P. J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 41555.
    Protests 521410-G, etc., of F. Ducasse & Son (New York).
   Opinion by

Brown, J.

On the authority of Neuman v. United States (24 C. C. P. A. 127, T. D. 48606) and Wile v. United States (T. D. 49494) Madeira, Bercy, Bordelaise, and Newburgh wine sauces were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 775.

Sullivan, J., concurred.

McClelland, P. J.,

said: “I cannot concur in the conclusion reached by Judge Brown for the reason that I am convinced that wine with a small percentage of salt added is not a sauce within either the common or commercial meaning of the term as used in paragraph 775 of the Tariff Act of 1930.”