Case ID: so2d_287/html/0069-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James E. GUSTAFSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 43704.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Dec. 19, 1973.
    H. Franklin Robbins, Jr., James M. Russ, and Michael F. Cycmanick, the Law Offices of James M. Russ, Orlando, for petitioner.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and C. Marie Bernard, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari directed to the 4th District’s opinion reported at 273 So.2d 86 (1973), reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3) (1973), Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby

Discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN and McCAIN, JJ., dissent.