Case ID: fla_158/html/0795-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: BARNS, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HEWALL INVESTMENT COMPANY, a corporation, et al., v. ROBERT SCOTT.
    30 So. (2nd) 625
    January Term, 1947
    April 25, 1947
    En Banc
    Rehearing Denied April 20, 1947
    
      William J. Skinner, for appellants.
    
      Mabry, Reaves, Carlton, Anderson & Fields and H. D. Wentworth, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM:

This decree is affirmed upon the authority of Webb v. Scott, 129 Fla. 111, 176 So. 442.

THOMAS, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., •concur.

CHAPMAN and BARNS, JJ., dissent.

BARNS, J.,

dissenting:

It appears that the final decree appealed should be reversed for like reasons as stated in the case of Thomas Howell Scott v. Robert Scott this day rendered but in this case the •evidence is not clear as to the extent of benefits to the property by reason of the improvements made for payment of which the assessment was made.

Wherefore the decree is reversed with directions to the 'Chancellor to determine same and to proceed not inconsistent with the opinion in the case of Thomas Howell Scott v. Robert Scott, (supra).

CHAPMAN, J., concurs.