Case ID: nj_64/html/0548-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee C ubi am.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

D. H. M. INDUSTRIES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CENTRAL PORT WAREHOUSES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND CORBIN-BAY REALTY CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, D. H. OVERMYER, CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND D. H. OVERMYER CO., INC., AN OHIO CORPORATION, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
    Argued March 19, 1974
    Decided April 2, 1974.
    
      
      Mr. Burton T. Cohen, argued the cause for appellant (Walter Henry Jones, attorney).
    
      Mr. David J. Goldberg, argued the cause for respondent D. H. M. Industries, Inc. (Messrs. Warren, Goldberg & Berman, attorneys).
   Pee C ubi am.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority’s per curiam opinion.

For affirmance—Chief Justice Hughes and Justices Hall, Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman and Clieeokd—6.

For reversal—Hone.