Case ID: ohio-law-abs_1/html/0358-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 338
    MAKRANCZY v. GELFAND, Admr.
    Ohio Court of Appeals, Eighth Dist.
    No. 4279.
    March 26, 1923
    This opinion lias not been published except in Abstract
    ERROR — None found to warrant reversal of judg ment.
    Vickery, Sullivan and Levine, JJ.
    Error to Cuyahoga Common Pleas
    Judgment Affirmed
    Attorneys — Quigley & Byrnes, for Makranczy; Vickery & Vickery, Contra.
   PER CURIAM.

A judgment of $2,000 was rendered in the Commb! Pleas in favor of defendant in error, who had sue¡ as the administrator of his daughter who was killei in an automobile accident. Many errors are allege: why the judgment should be reversed, but we havi gone through the record, and heard the arguments of counsel, but do not find any error that'will warrant us in reversing the judgment.