Case ID: a3d_32/html/0438-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Glenn E. CULPEPPER, Respondent.
    No. 11-BG-1071.
    District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
    Filed Dec. 8, 2011.
    BEFORE: GLICKMAN, Associate Judge, and TERRY and KING, Senior Judges.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction by consent, Attorney Grievance Com’n of Maryland v. Culpepper, 421 Md. 190, 25 A.3d 1023 (2011), this court’s September 19, 2011, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline,

ORDERED that Glenn E. Culpepper is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007), and In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C.2006) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate, including those involving disbarment). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar R. XI, § 14(g).