Case ID: f_88/html/0991-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PARRANGE, District Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

VOGEMANN v. KEYSER et al. KEYSER et al. v. VOGEMANN.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    May 31, 1898.)
    No. 656.
    Ben. C. Tuni-son, for H. Vogemann.
    John C. Avery, for W. S. Keyser & Co.
    Before PARDEE and McCORMICK, Circuit Judges, and PARLANCE, District Judge.
   PARRANGE, District Judge.

The issues in this case a,re the same as those in case No. 655, decided this day (Schmidt v. Keyser, 88 Fed. 799), and involving the construction of the “cesser clause,” identical in language with that in case No. 655. The decree appealed from is affirmed.