Case ID: nw2d_525/html/0250-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joan KIEFFER and Peter Kieffer, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Richard W. HUEBNER, Defendant and Appellee, and the unknown driver of a large dark colored motor vehicle, Defendant.
    Civ. No. 940165.
    Supreme Court of North Dakota.
    Oct. 27, 1994.
    Joe A. Johnson of Wegner, Fraase, Nor-deng, Johnson & Ramstad, Fargo, for plaintiffs and appellants.
    Barton J. Cahill, Cahill & Marquart, Moor-head, MN, for defendant and appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Joan and Peter Kieffer appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial. Kieffers argue the trial court’s order of denial was a manifest abuse of discretion.

We affirm under Rule 35.1(a)(4), N.D.R.App.P.

VANDE WALLE, C.J., and SANDSTROM, NEUMANN, LEVINE and MESCHKE, JJ., concur.