Case ID: misc_143/html/0243-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam. Levy, J. Callahan, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Barclay Ball, Respondent, v. Nippon Yusen (Kabushiki) Kaisha and Canadian Pacific Railway Company, Appellants.
    
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    March 25, 1932.
    
      Hardin, Hess & Eder [.Harold B. Elgar and Frank Bashap of counsel], for appellant Canadian Pacific Railway Company.
    
      Burlingham, Veeder, Fearey, Clark & Hupper [Bay Bood Allen and Burton H. White of counsel], for the appellant Nippon Yusen Kaisha.
    
      Single & Single [Gregory S. Bivkins and Frank H. Gerrodette of counsel], for the respondent.
    
      
       Aff'g. 142 Misc. 201.
    
   Per Curiam.

Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of Brown v. Canadian Pacific R. Co. (143 Misc. 239), decided herewith.

Levy, J.

I concur in result for reasons indicated by me in Baltimore Pub. Co. v. Swedish-Am. Mex. Line, Ltd. (143 Misc. 229), decided herewith.

Callahan, J.

I concur for reasons stated by me in Brown v. Canadian Pacific R. Co. (143 Misc. 239), and Baltimore Pub. Co. v. Swedish-Am. Mex. Line, Ltd. (Id. 229), decided herewith.