Case ID: sw3d_323/html/0859-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel N. ROGERS, Appellant.
    No. WD 71597.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Nov. 9, 2010.
    Craig A. Johnston, Assistant State Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, John W. Grantham, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before Division Two: JAMES EDWARD WELSH, Presiding Judge, and MARK D. PFEIFFER and KAREN KING MITCHELL, Judges.
   Order

PER CURIAM:

This is a child molestation case. The issue is whether there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find that the defendant had the purpose of sexually gratifying any person when he touched the victim’s genitals. We hold that there was. Therefore, we affirm. Rule 80.25(b).