Case ID: so3d_151/html/0493-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Arthur W. FOLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 3D14-1023, 3D14-0627.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 1, 2014.
    Rehearing Denied Nov. 6, 2014.
    Arthur W. Foley, in proper person.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before SUAREZ, EMAS and SCALES, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

On May 5, 2014, in Case Number 3D14-1023, Arthur W. Foley, filed a Notice of Appeal from the trial court’s April 17, 2014, “Order Recommending Sanctions and Directions to the Clerk of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court,” wherein the trial court recommended that Foley be sanctioned for abusing the judicial process and directed the Clerk of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit not to accept any further filings from Foley unless signed by an attorney duly licensed to practice law in Florida.

On July 10, 2014, we consolidated Case Number 3D14-0627 with the instant case, 3D14-1023, and ordered Foley to file his initial brief within twenty days of the date of that order, i.e., by July 30, 2014, limited only to arguments directed in Case Number 3D14-1023.

Having filed no initial brief by July 30, this court, on August 20, 2014, ordered Foley to show cause within ten days why the appeal in Case Number 3D14-1023 should not be dismissed for failure to file an initial brief. To date, Foley has not filed an initial brief.

Therefore, we dismiss the appeal in Case Number 3D14-1023. We further allow Foley twenty days from the date of this opinion to respond to this court’s previous May 28, 2014, show cause order as to why he should not be prohibited from filing any further pro se appeals, pleadings, motion, or petitions relating to lower tribunal number 99-37608. No further extensions shall be granted.

Appeal dismissed; show cause order issued. 
      
      . Foley appealed the denial of the trial court's February 27, 2014, order denying his motion for postconviction relief. On May 28, 2014, this court affirmed the order and simultaneously ordered Foley to show cause why he should not be prohibited from filing further pro se pleadings relating to lower tribunal case number 99-37608 lest he face sanctions. See Foley v. State, 139 So.3d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).
     
      
      . In response to our initial show cause order in Foley, 139 So.3d at 456, Foley urged us to provide him more time in which to respond to the order, contending he had other pending appeals in this court. We implicitly granted Foley's request by consolidating the cases and affording him time to file an initial brief.