Case ID: sw3d_143/html/0704-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Fred Greg FENSOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 63323.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Sept. 14, 2004.
    Deborah Daniels, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Susan L. Hogan, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
    Before SMART, P.J., ELLIS and HARDWICK, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Fred G. Fensom appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 Motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. We affirm, finding the allegations in his postconviction motion are refuted by the record. The parties have been provided with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would have no jurisprudential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)