Case ID: f-appx_361/html/0502-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Raphael MENDEZ, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. W. Earl BRITT, Federal Judge; James B. Craven, III, Federal Appointed Counsel; Alan DuBois, Federal Appointed Attorney; Jane E. Pearce, Federal Appointed Attorney, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 09-8104.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 14, 2010.
    Decided: Jan. 22, 2010.
    Raphael Mendez, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
   Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raphael Mendez seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal as frivolous. We also deny the motion to “notice of error”. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.