Case ID: nh_67/html/0598-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam\n      \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

King v. The State. Martin v. The State.
    
      Pred B. Osgood, for the plaintiffs.
    
      Solicitor and James W. Remiche for the state.
   Per Curiam

The facts are substantially the same as in Sylvester v. State, 65 N. H. 193;—see, also, Philpot v. State, 65 N. H. 250, and Leonard v. State, 65 N. H. 671.

Petitions denied.

All concurred. 
      
      ' See foot-note on page 80.