Case ID: ga-app_194/html/0857-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "McMurray, Presiding Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

A90A0531.
    HOWARD v. THE STATE.
    (392 SE2d 562)
    Decided March 13, 1990.
    
      Herbert Shafer, for appellant.
    
      Tommy K. Floyd, District Attorney, Thomas R. McBerry, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.
   McMurray, Presiding Judge.

This is a direct appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for pretrial bail. Ordinarily, the denial of a motion for pretrial bail is an interlocutory matter requiring a defendant to follow the interlocutory procedure set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See Lane v. State, 247 Ga. 387 (276 SE2d 644). At one time, pursuant to OCGA § 17-6-1 (c), the legislature provided that the denial of bail in such circumstances was directly appealable. See Foster v. State, 165 Ga. App. 137 (299 SE2d 420). Accord Merritt v. State, 169 Ga. App. 523, 524 (313 SE2d 780). Effective July 1, 1988, however, the language allowing for a direct appeal in such circumstances was deleted from the applicable Code section. Ga. L. 1988, pp. 358, 362. Defendant’s motion for pretrial bail is not a final judgment as defined in OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1). Since the defendant has not followed the interlocutory appeal procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Carley, C. J., and Sognier, J., concur.