Case ID: sw_288/html/0254-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BARCUS, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROBERTSON et al. v. GONZALES et ux.
    (No. 401.)
    (Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.
    Oct. 14, 1926.
    Rehearing Denied Nov. 11, 1926.)
    Appeal and error <&wkey;>759‘ — In absence of assignments of error in appellants’ brief, fundamental error only can be considered.
    Court of Civil Appeals can consider only fundamental error, where there are no assignments of error contained in appellants’ brief.
    Appeal from Johnson County Court; O. B. McPherson, Judge.
    Action between E. W. Robertson .and others, and P. G. Gonzales and wife. Judgment for the latter, and the former appeal.
    Affirmed.
    Warren & Russell, of Cleburne, for appellants.
    Jackson & Jackson, of Cleburne, for appel-lees.
   BARCUS, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment, rendered for appellees on an instructed verdict by the trial court. There are no assignments of error contained in appellants’ brief. We can therefore consider only fundamental error. Paris v. Estes (Tex. Civ. App.) 283 S. W. 529. There is no fundamental error apparent of record which would authorize this court to reverse the judgment of the trial court.

Appellants present only two propositions in their brief, and neither of them is supported by any assignment of error copied in the brief. We have, however, examined each of said propositions and do not think they show any reversible error.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.