Case ID: sw3d_501/html/0506-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Carol A. WHITLEY and John Matthew Kurz, Defendants/Appellants.
    No. ED 103559
    ED103380
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
    FILED: October 18, 2016
    Daniel R. Schramm Chesterfield, Missouri, for Appellant.
    Scott D. Mosier Chesterfield, Missouri, for Respondent.
    Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, J., and Lisa Van Amburg, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Appellants Carol A. Whitley and John M. Kurz appeal the trial court’s judgment denying them separate motions to vacate or amend summary judgment in favor of Flagstar Bank, FSB and for new trial. Appellant Whitley also appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Flagstar. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).