Case ID: njl_116/html/0411-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BLANCHE M. MARRINER, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM, ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. PAUL SO-MAY, Sr., IMPLEADED, RESPONDENT.
    Submitted February 14, 1936 —
    Decided May 14, 1936.
    For the appellants, Quinn, Parsons & Doremus.
    
    For the respondent, Green & Green.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.