Case ID: ohio-st-3d_39/html/0340-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "H. Brown, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State, ex rel. Gaeta, Appellee, v. City of Cleveland, Appellant.
    [Cite as State, ex rel. Gaeta, v. Cleveland (1988), 39 Ohio St. 3d 340.]
    (No. 87-1586
    — Submitted October 5, 1988 —
    Decided November 16, 1988.)
    
      Friedman, Chenette, Domiano & Smith Co., L.P.A., and Jeffrey H. Friedman, for appellee.
    
      Marilyn G. Zack, director of law, Robert M. Wolff and Peter N. Kirsanow, for appellant.
   For the reasons stated in Gaeta v. Cleveland (1988), 39 Ohio St. 3d 338, 530 N.E. 2d 1316, decided this date, the appeal is dismissed as being moot.

Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., and H. Brown, J., dissent.

H. Brown, J.,

dissenting. I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissent in Gaeta v. Cleveland, supra.

Moyer, C.J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.