Case ID: f-appx_402/html/0202-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Astarte DAVIS-RICE, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Paul COPENHAVER, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
    No. 08-15968.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.
    
    Filed Oct. 29, 2010.
    Astarte Davis-Rice, San Bruno, CA, pro se.
    Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Federal prisoner Astarte Davis-Rice appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 ha-beas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we remand to the district court for reconsideration.

Davis-Rice contends that the Bureau of Prisons failed to give her credit for time spent in custody prior to sentencing. The district court dismissed her petition as du-plicative of a previously filed action. In her petition, Davis-Rice conceded that she previously raised this claim. However, the district court previously dismissed the claims as unexhausted, and Davis-Rice alleged in her petition that the claims are now exhausted. We remand to the district court for reconsideration because the order did not address Davis-Rice’s allegation that her previously dismissed claims are now exhausted.

REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.