Case ID: so2d_929/html/0665-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Douglas TUNSIL, III, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D06-884.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 17, 2006.
    Rehearing Denied June 7, 2006.
    Douglas Tunsil, III, in proper person.
    Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before WELLS, CORTINAS, and ROTHENBERG JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Reese v. State, 899 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (confirming that infirmity in notice of intent to seek enhanced sentence must be raised in a timely Rule 3.850 motion); Tunsil v. State, 797 So.2d 651, 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(re-manding for resentencing as expressly ordered and stating “[defendant need not be present” for same).