Case ID: so2d_624/html/0868-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MAPLEWOOD FARMS, INC., and Don Corry, Appellants, v. BAYWOOD MANOR FARMS, INC., Appellee.
    No. 93-270.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 12, 1993.
    Pesetsky & Zack, P.A., and Elliott Zack and Lawrence M. Weisberg, North Miami Beach, for appellants.
    G.P. Della Fera, Miami, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and COPE, JJ.'
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment because, in our view, the appellee’s claim was entitled to priority. We strike, as unnecessary to the adjudication, so much of the order as states that the assignment is void. Because the issue may recur, we note that the assignee attorney is not an insider. See § 726.102(7), Fla.Stat. (1991). The parties’ attention is invited to the terms of subsection 726.104(1), Florida Statutes (1991).

Affirmed.