Case ID: ny_229/html/0564-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per. Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles Fosmire, Respondent, v. National Surety Company, Appellant.
    (Submitted June 1, 1920;
    decided June 8, 1920.)
    Motions for amendment of remittitur, for leave to serve amended complaint and for a re-argument. (See 229 N. Y. 44.)
   Per. Curiam.

The Special Term properly denied the plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, but, in the absence of a counter-motion by the defendant, it erred in going farther and dismissing the complaint.

The remittitur should, therefore, be amended so as to provide that the order of the Appellate Division be reversed and that of the Special Term modified by striking out the direction for judgment of dismissal, and as modified affirmed, without costs to either party, and the question certified answered in the negative.

Except as aforesaid, the plaintiff’s motions for an amendment of the remittitur, for leave to serve an amended complaint, and for a re-argument, are denied.

All concur.