Case ID: conn-app_18/html/0826-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cheryl A. Ricciardi v. Edward T. Ricciardi
    (7271)
    Daly, Foti and Jacobson, Js.
    Argued May 16
    decision released June 8, 1989
    
      
      Edward T. Ricciardi, pro se, the appellant (defendant).
    
      Mark M. Wrenn, with whom, on the brief, was James P. Caulfield, for the appellee (plaintiff).
   Per Curiam.

The defendant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to modify child support payments.

The defendant, as the appellant, has the burden of showing that there was error in the judgment from which the appeal was taken. Manzin v. United Bank & Trust Co., 6 Conn. App. 513, 517, 506 A.2d 169 (1986). We have carefully considered the defendant’s claims of error and, after affording those claims the appropriate scope of review, we find that the defendant has not met his burden.

There is no error.