Case ID: f-appx_651/html/0224-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN RE: Antonio MOSLEY, a/k/a Abdullah Hamid, Petitioner.
    No. 16-1093
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 12, 2016
    Decided: June 8, 2016
    Antonio Mosley, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Petition dismissed in part and denied in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Mosley petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) action in ruling on his motion for access to sealed court records and his motion for bond. He further claims that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction.

Because the district court’s criminal docket reveals that the court denied Mosley’s § 3582(c)(2) motion on February 5, 2016, we dismiss Mosley’s mandamus petition in part as moot. Moreover, our review of the civil docket does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition in part. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny Mosley’s motion for release on bail. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART