Case ID: f-appx_82/html/0502-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rahjah JAHHAR, Appellant, v. AT & T COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Appellee.
    No. 03-2656.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 3, 2003.
    Decided Dec. 9, 2003.
    Rahjah Jahhar, pro se, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    R. Scott Davies, Tamika R. Nordstrom, Briggs & Morgan, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before BYE, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
   [UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Rahjah Jahhar appeals the district court’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful review of the record, see Gordon v. Hansen, 168 F.3d 1109, 1113 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam) (de novo standard of review), we agree that Jahhar failed to state a claim because he did not allege any state action, see Youngblood v. Hy-Vee Food Stores, Inc., 266 F.3d 851, 855 (8th Cir.2001) (“Only state actors can be held liable under Section 1983.”), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1017, 122 S.Ct. 1606, 152 L.Ed.2d 621 (2002). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.