Case ID: f-appx_290/html/0057-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. ZHICHENG ZENG, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-10013.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 22, 2008.
    
    Filed Aug. 7, 2008.
    Denise Marie Barton, Barbara J. Valli-ere, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Kari E. Hong, Oakland, CA, Zhicheng Zeng, Pasadena, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    
      Before: B. FLETCHER, THOMAS, and WARD LAW, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Zhicheng Zeng appeals from the six-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for making and using a writing containing a false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(3). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Zeng contends that the government breached his plea agreement when it recommended that the district court impose a six-month term of imprisonment. He contends that the government promised not to recommend a sentence that included prison time. The record belies this contention. Because the government never promised not to recommend a prison sentence, it did not breach the plea agreement. See United States v. Jeronimo, 398 F.3d 1149, 1153 (9th Cir.2005).

Zeng does not dispute that the appeal waiver in the plea agreement was knowing and voluntary. Because the sentence comported with the agreement, we affirm the decision of the district court. See United States v. Bibler, 495 F.3d 621, 623-24 (9th Cir.2007).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.