Case ID: so2d_171/html/0583-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Leo HENZEL, Appellant, v. Otto P. CIPRA, Joseph Sambataro, Charles I. Babcock and John N. Gibson, Appellees.
    No. 64-983.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    Feb. 9, 1965.
    Rehearing Denied March 2, 1965.
    Fink & Syna, Miami, for appellant.
    Rutledge & Henry, So. Miami, for ap-pellees.
    Before BARKDULL, C. J., and TILLMAN PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals an order striking his pleading and entering a default against him. The record supports the finding of the chancellor that the defendant, appcl-lant, had wilfully violated the orders of the court.

The order is affirmed. See Rashard v. Cappiali, Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 581 [opinion filed February 9, 1965].

Affirmed.