Case ID: a3d_6/html/0500-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Louis GARZONE, Respondent.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Oct. 14, 2010.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of October 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as phrased by Petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err in removing the cost of employing county detectives and assistant district attorneys from the trial court’s discretion to impose prosecution expenses on a convicted offender?

This matter is to be consolidated with Commonwealth v. Gerald Garzone, — Pa. -, 6 A.3d 499 (2010).