Case ID: so2d_598/html/0109-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "THREADGILL, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert L. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 90-02142.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 3, 1992.
    Rehearing Denied May 12, 1992.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Cecilia A. Traina, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Katherine V. Blanco, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   THREADGILL, Judge.

Robert Scott appeals from his judgment and sentence following the revocation of his probation. First, he argues that the trial court erred in revoking his probation. We find that the revocation was supported by competent evidence, and we therefore affirm the judgment.

Scott also argues that the trial court erred in sentencing him as an habitual offender upon the revocation of his probation. This court in King v. State, 597 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), has decided this issue adversely to the appellant’s position. The record supports his classification as an habitual felony offender. Accordingly, we affirm the appellant’s sentence.

Affirmed.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CASE, JAMES, R., Associate Judge, concur.