Case ID: f-appx_596/html/0589-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando NUNEZ-FLORES, aka Alfonso Barrutia-Gonzalez, aka Fernando Flores Nunez, aka Fernando Nunez Flores, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-10092.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted Feb. 26, 2015 
    
    Filed March 10, 2015.
    Christina Marie Cabanillas, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Jack L. Lansdale, Jr., Esquire, Law Offices of Jack L. Landsdale, Jr., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2)
    
   ORDER

Appellee’s Unopposed Motion to Vacate Sentence and Remand for Resentencing, filed February 4, 2015, is GRANTED. The filing of this order shall serve as the court’s mandate. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3