Case ID: neb_119/html/0859-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

State, ex rel. O. S. Spillman, Attorney General, v. Dannebrog State Bank, appellant: H. P. Petersen, appellee.
    Filed January 8, 1930.
    No. 26981.
    
      C. M. SMles, Taylor & Spikes and Better & James, for appellant.
    
      Haggart & Haggart, contra.
    
    Heard before Rose, Dean, Good, Thompson, Eberly and Day, JJ., and Foster, District Judge.
   Per Curiam.

H. P. Petersen, appellee herein, filed a claim in the receivership proceedings brought to wind up the affairs of the Dannebrog State bank, based on two certificates of deposit in the amounts of $1,666.67 and $2,500, respectively. The district court for Howard county found the $1,666.67 item to be a general claim and the $2,500 item to be a preferred claim and allowed both as an off-set against a $7,000 note of Petersen and entered judgment in favor of the receiver of the Dannebrog State Bank and against Petersen for $4,384.66. The receiver has appealed.

We have carefully examined the record and find it to be free from prejudicial error. The judgment of the district court is therefore

Affirmed.