Case ID: nj-eq_71/html/0768-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Arthur L. Andrews v. Guayaquil and Quito Railway Company et al.
    [Argued June 22d, 1906.
    Decided June 25th, 1906.]
    On appeal of Robert C. Pruyn from an order of the court of chancery, advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevens, whose opinion is reported in i&9 N. J. Fq. (3 Robb.) 211.
    
    
      Mr. Fdivin B. Williamson, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Charles L. Corbin, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.

For affirmance—'The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Eeed, Trenohard, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray—13!

For reversal—None.