Case ID: sw3d_448/html/0874-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bobby D. RIDENOUR, Appellant.
    No. ED 100472
    Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR
    Filed: November 25, 2014
    Amanda Faerber, Assistant Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
    Karen Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
    Before Patricia L. Cohen, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bobby Ridenour (Defendant) appeals the judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of robbery in the first degree, burglary in the first degree, and two counts of armed criminal action. Defendant claims the trial court erred in accepting the jury’s verdict and convicting him of first-degree burglary because the State produced insufficient evidence to establish that Defendant entered the victim’s apartment for the purpose of committing the crime of first-degree robbery.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).