Case ID: nj-eq_86/html/0244-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John Antonio D’Elissa, respondent, v. Rosa D’Amato et al., appellants.
    [Submitted March 27th, 1916.
    Decided June 19th, 1916.]
    On appeal from a decree of the conrt of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Griffin, whose opinion, is reported in 85 N. J. Fq. Jf€6.
    
    
      Mr. Anthony Botti, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. Frank Benjamin, for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Gaebison, Swayze, Teenchabd, Paekee, Beegen, Mintuen, Kalisch, Black, White, Teehune, Heppenheimeb, Williams, Tayloe, Gaednee — 15.

For reversal — None.