Case ID: f-appx_551/html/0075-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Abdul-Aziz Rashid MUHAMMAD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Russell A. PURDUE, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 13-7453.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 21, 2014.
    Decided: Jan. 24, 2014.
    Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Jarod James Douglas, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Muhammad v. Purdue, No. 5:12-cv-00129-FPS-JSK, 2013 WL 4508870 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.