Case ID: ohio-st_175/html/0249-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      \n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State, ex rel. Andrews, v. Board of Elections of Medina County et al.
    (No. 38387 —
    Decided October 18, 1963.)
    
      Mr. Neil W. Whitfield, for relator.
    
      Mr. James W. Foreman, prosecuting attorney, for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

As to the third petition paper above referred to, there has not been a substantial compliance with the mandatory requirements of .the statute (Section 3513.261, Revised Code). The motion by respondents to vacate the default judgment heretofore entered is sustained and a writ of mandamus is denied. See State, ex rel. Allen, v. Board of Elections of Lake County, 170 Ohio St., 19; State, ex rel. Ferguson, v. Brown, Secy, of State, 173 Ohio St., 317.

Writ denied.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Herbert, J., dissents.