Case ID: so2d_874/html/0727-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joe E. MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D04-963.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 9, 2004.
    Joe E. Moore, in proper person.
    Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before COPE, FLETCHER and RAMIREZ, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Johnson v. State, 763 So.2d 283, 284-85 (Fla.2000) (“Prior to the amendments produced by chapter 95-182, robbery was one of the qualifying offenses which allowed a trial court to sentence a defendant as a habitual violent felony offender. See § 775.084(l)(b)l.c., Fla. Stat. (1993). Thus, Johnson would have qualified as a habitual violent felony offender prior to the amendments reflected in chapter 95-182.... In sum, we find that Johnson was not affected by the passage of chapter 95-182.”).