Case ID: nj-eq_140/html/0104-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Andrew W. Merwin, respondent, Virginia M. Merwin, appellant.
    [Argued February 6th, 1947.
    Decided April 24th, 1947.]
    
      
      Mr. Bichard J. Macicey, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Matthew F. Mélico, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expi-essed in the opinion filed in the Court of Chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Bodinb, Donges, Colie, Wachbnfeld, Eastwood, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, JJ. 10.

For affirmance on the result — Heher, Eafferty, JJ. 2.

For modification — McGeehan, J. 1,