Case ID: njl_80/html/0460-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHARLES CHRISTIANSEN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. W. H. & F. W. CANE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    Argued June 23, 1910
    Decided September 16, 1910.
    For the plaintiff in error,. Charles F. 8. Simpson and Bichard Jam,es Donovan (of the Eew York Bar).
    For the defendant in error, Frederick J. Faulks.
    
   Per Curiam.

Eo bill of exceptions has been filed with the writ of error, and although the attention of counsel was called to the defect upon the argument, the lack has not been supplied. Eo error has been made to appear to us and the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Gray, Dill, Congdon, JJ. 14.

For reversal—Eone.