Case ID: so3d_184/html/0583-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Iehuda TZYNDER, Appellant, v. Keren EDELSBURG, Appellee.
    No. 3D15-671.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Jan. 27, 2016.
    Nancy A. Hass,. Hollywood, for appellant. ; •
    Kahn, Lewen & Resnik and Greg A. Lewen and Marcy S. Resnik, Dania, for appellee.
    Before WELLS, ROTHENBERG and EMAS, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant Iehuda Tzynder áppeals from a final judgment modifying parental responsibility and timesharing. We affirm the final judgment in all' respects,, save one: the final judgment modifies Tzyn-der’s timesharing with the' minor child by restricting contact to one time per week, and requires that all contact with and access to the minor child be in a supervised setting. However, the final judgment fails to identify what steps Tzynder must take in order to reestablish unsupervised time-sharing. On remand, the trial court shall amend the final judgment to identify the necessary steps which Tzynder must take in order to reestablish unsupervised time-sharing with the parties’ minor child. See Hunter v. Hunter, 540 So.2d 235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Perez v. Fay, 160 So.3d 459 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.