Case ID: us_203/html/0584-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 110.
    David Lamar, Plaintiff in Error, v. Albert G. Spalding.
    Argued for defendant in error and submitted for plaintiff in error November 16, 1906.
    Decided November 19, 1906.
    
      Mr. Alan H. Strong and Mr. Harry Allen Mendelson for plaintiff in error. Mr. Edmund .Wilson for defendant in error.
   In error to the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. Schmidt, 177 U. S. 230. Case below, 68 N. J. Eq. 686.