Case ID: sw3d_493/html/0052-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Earl Chance PITT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 103286
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    FILED: June 30, 2016
    FOR, APPELLANT: Matthew Hucke-by, 1010 Market street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.
    FOR RESPONDENT: Chris Foster, Mary H. Moore, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
    Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Roy L. Richter,. J,
   ' ORDER

PER CURIAM

■ Earl. Chanpe Pitt (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his amended motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no. error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).