Case ID: so2d_664/html/0066-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mark WEINSTOCK, Appellant, v. CITY OF PLANTATION, Appellee.
    No. 94-2434.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Dec. 13, 1995.
    Edna L. Caruso of Caruso, Burlington, Bohn & Compiani, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Marvin B. Nodel of Abramowitz & Pomerantz, Sunrise, for appellant.
    Bruce Johnson and Michael R. Piper of Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke & George, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand for a new trial on future economic damages only. See Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Tompkins, 651 So.2d 89 (Fla.1995). Albeit harmless, the errors asserted in appellant’s third and fourth issues on appeal are not to be repeated. We find no reversible error on these two issues nor any of the remaining issues not discussed hereinabove and affirm as to same.

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.