Case ID: cust-ct_2/html/0798-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Brown, Judge:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

H. S. Dorf & Co., Inc. v. United States
    No. 4487.
    Invoice dated Gdynia, Poland, June 5, 1936.
    Entered at New York, September 19, 1936.
    Entry No. 736523.
    (Decided January 9, 1939)
    
      Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley S. King of counsel) for the plaintiff.
    
      Webster J. Oliver, Assistant Attorney General (Dorothy C. Bennett, special attorney), for the defendant.
   Brown, Judge:

Tte issue here on conflicting- evidence is a pure question of fact, no question of law being involved. The question is not easy of solution, but on the whole it is considered that the weight of the evidence leans in favor of the appraiser’s action. The appraised value is accordingly affirmed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.