Case ID: so2d_689/html/0999-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "McMILLAN, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Broderick Keith BURKS v. STATE.
    CR-95-1449.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    Nov. 22, 1996.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 17, 1997.
    Robert B. Sanford, Birmingham, for appellant.
    Jeff Sessions, Atty. Gen., and Cedric Col-vin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
   On Return to Remand

McMILLAN, Judge.

This case was remanded in order for the trial court to assess the penalty prescribed under the Demand Reduction Assessment Act for a defendant who is convicted of unlawful distribution of a controlled substance. The court has now filed its return, which reflects that, on remand, the appellant was fined $1,000, as mandated by § 13A-12-281, Code of Alabama 1975.

Therefore, the judgement of the trial court is due to be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All judges concur.