Case ID: so2d_540/html/0789-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte State of Alabama. (Re Huey Wayne BROADUS v. STATE).
    87-1456.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    March 31, 1989.
    Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and Charles W. Hart III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
    Robert F. Clark, Mobile, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Our action in quashing the writ of certio-rari in this case should not be taken as an expression of approval regarding the reasoning in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. 540 So.2d 786.

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, JONES, ALMON, SHORES, ADAMS, HOUSTON, STEAGALL and KENNEDY, JJ„ concur.