Case ID: ad2d_143/html/0505-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Vincent J. Consiglio, Appellant, v Chris Consiglio et al., Respondents.
   Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, and defendants’ motion denied. Memorandum: Special Term erred in granting defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint pursuant to Partnership Law § 74 on the ground that it was barred by the Statute of Limitations (CPLR 3211 [a] [5]). There is an issue of fact when, if ever, the partnership was dissolved, and thus, when, if ever, the cause of action accrued (see, Bernstein v La Rue, 120 AD2d 476, lv dismissed 70 NY2d 746). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.