Case ID: njl_110/html/0026-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GUSSIE BLAND, RESPONDENT, v. DAVID GROSS, APELLANT.
    Submitted October 28, 1932
    Decided January 23, 1933.
    Bor the respondent, Meyer C. Ellenstein.
    
    Bor the appellant, Charles Btockdell Cray.
    
   Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 446.

For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Kays, Hetfield, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.