Case ID: cow_7/html/0367-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

*Gold against Hotchkiss.
    UTICA,
    August, 1827.
    Where the counsefarethe same, only one lowed; the whti shall be an attorney orcounsel fee.
    
      T. Sill, for the plaintiff.
    
      J. A. Spencer, for the defendant.
    On motion to re-tax costs, the court decided, that where f^e attorney was also the counsel in the cause, the party recovering was not entitled to have both an attorney and counsel fee, on trial, taxed; but only one; and he might whicL (Vid. 2 R. L. 15, 16.)