Case ID: so2d_623/html/1189-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael Anthony DAVIS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 80922.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Sept. 16, 1993.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Brad Permar, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Dale E. Tarpley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We review Davis v. State, 609 So.2d 131 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), based on a certified question. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We answered the question in Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993). The decision of the district court of appeal, insofar as it affected petitioner’s sentencing, is quashed and the case is remanded for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Tripp.

It is so ordered.

BARRETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.