Case ID: f2d_451/html/1026-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charlie Marshall ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 30910.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Dec. 28, 1971.
    Clyde W. Woody, Marian S. Rosen, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant.
    Anthony J. P. Farris, U. S. Atty., C. Leland Hamel, James R. Gough, Asst. U. S. Attys., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
    Before BELL, AINSWORTH and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration, the confession of error offered by the government in this matter is accepted.

The question presented as to the validity of the search may or may not arise on a subsequent trial. We pretermit decision as to that question, having in mind the need for development of the facts on the subsequent trial pertaining to a border search.

The other errors assigned have been considered and are without merit.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.