Case ID: nj-eq_112/html/0290-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harry S. Katzin, Herman Z. Baum, Moritz L. Cohen and Samuel Katzin, complainants-respondents, v. Kruvant-Mayzel Company, a corporation of New Jersey, and Harry Kruvant, defendants-appellants.
    [Submitted October term, 1932.
    Decided January 31st, 1933.]
    
      
      Messrs. Xanter & Xanter (Mr. Elias A. Xanter, of counsel), for the appellants.
    
      Mr. Theodore Silver (Mr. Thomas B. Healey, of counsel), for the respondents.
   Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry. We have considered the allowance of counsel fee made by the vice-chancellor, and find nothing in the record to indicate that it was excessive. We therefore conclude it should not be disturbed.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Teenchaed, Pabkee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Beogan, Hehee, Kays, Heteield, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.