Case ID: ny_236/html/0507-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jennie M. Oppenheim, Appellant, v. Martha Kridel, Respondent.
    
      Appeal — reversal on facts as well as law — motion to dismiss appeal denied.
    
    Reported below, 204 App. Div. 305.
    (Submitted April 16, 1923;
    decided April 24, 1923.)
    Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment, entered February 2,1923, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and directing a dismissal of the complaint.
    The motion was made upon the ground that the reversal was upon the facts as well as the law and there being a question of fact in the case the Court of Appeals had no power of review.
    
      Charles A. Brodek for motion.
    
      George Gordon Battle and Isaac H. Levy opposed.
   Motion denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements.