Case ID: ga-app_30/html/0049-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

14097.
    Huling v. Hargett.
    Decided March 7, 1923.
    Trover; from Harris superior court — Judge Munro. October 7, 1922.
    
      J. B. Lunsford, for plaintiff in error.
    
      G. 17. Huling contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial requires a reversal of the judgment below.

Jugment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, J.J., concur.