Case ID: f-appx_690/html/0190-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mario Ruben ROBLEDO-DURAN, Defendant-Appellant
    No. 16-11477 Summary Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Filed June 1, 2017
    James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S.. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Mario Ruben Robledo-Duran, Pro Se
    Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Ruben Robledo-Duran has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Roble-do-Duran has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant parts of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal of the conviction presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5th Oír. R. 42.2, and in part as moot based on Robledo-Duran’s completion of the prison term imposed and the absence of a term of supervised release, see United States v. Heredia-Holguin, 823 F.3d 337, 341 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc). 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.