Case ID: f-appx_670/html/0123-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gwennetta PRATT-MILLER; Curtis Dawkins, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Sheriff Beth ARTHUR, Defendant-Appellee, and Craig Patterson, individually and in his Official Capacity; County of Arlington Virginia; Arlington County Sheriff's Office, Defendants.
    No. 16-1045
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: October 18, 2016
    Decided: November 3, 2016
    
      Sidney Sehupak, LAW OFFICES OF SIDNEY SCHUPAK, LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland, for Appellant. Alexander Fran-euzenko, Broderick Coleman Dunn, COOK CRAIG & FRANCUZENKO, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gwennetta Pratt-Miller and Curtis Dawkins seek to appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the Appellee but allowing the claims against the remaining Defendant to go forward. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory 'and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order the Appellants seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED