Case ID: so2d_481/html/0028-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SAC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. MILAM DAIRY ASSOCIATES, a Florida partnership and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
    No. 84-1968.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 10, 1985.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 21, 1986.
    Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Mallory Horton, Miami, for appellant/cross-appel-lee.
    Irving B. Levenson, Miami Beach, for appellees/cross-appellants.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We do not agree with appellant’s contentions that, in two respects, the trial court erred in setting aside portions of an arbitrator’s award on the ground that they were unauthorized by the underlying agreement. See School Board of Seminole County v. Cornelison, 406 So.2d 484 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), pet. for review denied, 421 So.2d 67 (Fla.1982). Likewise, we find no merit in the claim on cross-appeal that another aspect of the award was beyond the issues submitted to arbitration. See 6 C.J.S. Arbitration § 109 (1975); cf. Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.190(b). Accordingly, the judgment under review, in its entirety, is

Affirmed.