Case ID: ad2d_91/html/1099-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of John Reidy et al., Appellants, v William G. Connelie, as Superintendent of the Division of the New York State Police, Respondent.
   — Motion for clarification denied, without costs. Since the matter was remitted to respondent for the conduct of proceedings (Matter of Reidy v Connelie, 82 AD2d 986), it is for respondent to determine the format of such proceedings. Petitioners may, of course, raise this issue upon judicial review of any ultimate adverse determination. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.