Case ID: so2d_147/html/0573-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John A. LYDEM, doing business as Mickler & Lyden, Appellant, v. Lilia Rojas DePIERA and Henri F. Withington and Gladys Withington, his wife, Appellees.
    No. 62-290.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    Dec. 18, 1962.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 3, 1963.
    Robert M. Brake, Coral Gables, for appellant.
    Owen S. Freed and Joseph H. Murphy, Coral Gables, for appellees.
    Before HORTON, BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, seeks review of a final judgment rendered in favor of the defendant following a non-jury trial.

Unfortunately, the trial proceedings were not transcribed and the record has not been perfected in accordance with the principles announced in Potash v. Dry & Company, 8 Fla.Supp. 174, which procedure was cited with approval by this court in Moyer v. Moyer, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 638.

Therefore, not having the evidence before us that was taken in the trial court, we have no alternative but to affirm the final judgment. See: Hall v. Davis, Fla.App. 1958, 106 So.2d 599.

Affirmed.