Case ID: sw3d_470/html/0794-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harley J. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 101702
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    Filed: September 22, 2015
    Srikant Chigurupati, 1010 . Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Rachel Flaster, Asst. Atty: Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
    Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Lawrence E. Mooney, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Harley J. Smith appeals the 'motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2) & (5).