Case ID: ohio-st-3d_68/html/0202-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Leyshon.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Leyshon (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 202.]
    (No. 93-1712
    Submitted September 28, 1993
    Decided February 2, 1994.)
    
      
      Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally A. Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
    
      James N. Perry, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, we suspend respondent from the practice of law for two years, with the final year of the suspension stayed for a probationary period of two years, if during this period the respondent receives continuing treatment from a licensed psychiatrist or psychologist such as Dr. Siddall. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, J., dissents and would suspend respondent from the practice of law for one year, with six months stayed.