Case ID: ga_170/html/0505-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "•Gilbert, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Johns v. Lay-Hall Grocery Company. Ralston v. Lay-Hall Grocery Company.
    Nos. 7605, 7606.
    April 19, 1930.
    
      F. A. Cantrell and J. H. Pas chalí, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Joseph M. Lang, contra.
   •Gilbert, J.

1. The plaintiff in fi. fa. failed to carry the burden of proof. The evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. The court erred in refusing a new trial.

2. None of the grounds of amendment to the motion for new trial show error. Judgments reversed.

All the Justices concur.