Case ID: nys_133/html/1117-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

COSTIGAN, Respondent, v. NEW YORK & S. RY. CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    January 26, 1912.)
    Action by Michael Costigan against the New York & Stamford Railway Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, with §10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with §10 costs, upon the ground that defendant is not estopped from denying its liability, and has not been guilty of laches in moving to amend its answer.