Case ID: so2d_793/html/0997-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jason Larry ZIEGEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D00-400.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Aug. 30, 2001.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Judith Dougherty Hall, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, Attorneys for Appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Laura M. Fullerton López, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Attorneys for Appellee.
   ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on Appellant’s motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc. We grant the motion for rehearing, and deny rehearing en banc. The opinion of March 27, 2001, erroneously affirmed the revocation of probation. We therefore remand for the trial court to make the requisite findings of whether Appellant had the ability to pay restitution. If, on remand, the trial court revokes Appellant’s probation, it should specify the conditions of probation he was found to have violated.

BOOTH, DAVIS and POLSTON, JJ., CONCUR.