Case ID: ohio-st-3d_61/html/0072-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ohio State Bar Association v. Dye, Judge.
    [Cite as Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Dye (1991), 61 Ohio St.Sd 72.]
    
      (No. 90-2089
    Submitted March 20, 1991
    Decided July 3, 1991.)
    
      
      Albert L. Bell, William L. Burton and Edwin C. Johnston, for relator. Charles W. Kettlewell and James W. Ransbottom, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We adopt the board’s findings of fact and conclusions of law and will accept the parties’ strong recommendation. Thus, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent for having violated Canons 3(A)(2), 3(A)(3), 3(A)(4), 3(A)(5), and 3(B)(1) of the Code of Judicial Conduct. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.