Case ID: f-appx_185/html/0259-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gary D. BEAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 05-2042.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 9, 2006.
    Decided: June 14, 2006.
    David A. Branch, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Emmett F. McGee, Jr., Paul A. Mallos, DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Gary D. Bean appeals a district court order granting summary judgment against him in his employment discrimination action against United Parcel Service, Incorporated. Finding no error, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.