Case ID: a3d_144/html/0040-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Karen A. CACO, Respondent.
    No. 16-BG-467.
    District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
    Filed Aug. 4, 2016.
    Bar Registration No. 992216, DDN: 284-15.
    
      Before: GLICKMAN, Associate Judge, and NEBEKER and FARRELL, Senior Judges.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certifiéd order suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Florida for a period of one year, this court’s June 3,2016, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing her to show cause why the functionally-equivalent reciprocal discipline of a one year suspension with a fitness requirement should not be imposed, the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, the statement , of respondent wherein she consents to the imposition of reciprocal discipline, and respondent’s D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit filed on June 30, 2016, it is

ORDERED that Karen A. Caco is hereby suspended from the practice" of law in the District of Columbia for a period of one year nunc pro .tunc to June 30, 2016. Reinstatement is contingent upon a showing of fitness. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate).