Case ID: sw3d_128/html/0194-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Interest of K.J.D., JR., D.A.D., J.A.D., H.J.D., Plaintiff; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. K.J.D., Sr. (Father), Appellant, T.L.S. (Mother), Defendant.
    Nos. WD 63121-WD 63124.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    March 9, 2004.
    
      Juliann W. Graves, Overland Park, KS, Attorney and Guardian for KJD, Jr., DAD, JAD and HJD.
    John R. Shank, Jr., Kansas City, MO, for respondent Juvenile Officer.
    Steven M. Petry, Kansas City, MO, for appellant KJD Sr.
    Jack A. Lewis, North Kansas City, MO, for defendant TLS.
    Before: HARDWICK, P.J., SPINDEN and NEWTON, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

K.J.D., Sr. (Father) appeals from a judgment terminating parental rights to his four sons, K.J.D., Jr., D.A.D., H.J.D., and J.A.D. Upon review of the record, we find the judgment is supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence of Father’s abandonment of the children, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Father’s motion for continuance. The parties have been provided with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision to affirm the judgment, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).