Case ID: pa_630/html/0648-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

108 A.3d 29
    WALLER CORPORATION, Respondent, v. WARREN PLAZA, INC., Petitioner.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Jan. 21, 2015.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Should Warren’s Petition for Allowance of Appeal be granted because there are conflicting Pennsylvania Superior Court opinions about whether a good faith refusal to pay a contractor or subcontractor is or is not a factor to be considered when a court is deciding whether to award attorney fees under the Contractor Subcontractor Payment Act which creates uncertainty affecting thousands of businesses in the Commonwealth?