Case ID: ohio-law-abs_5/html/0173-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 216
    WEST. RES. BANK v. STATE ex.
    On motion to certify.
    Dock. Feb. 5, 1927,
    5 Abs. 90.
    387. DEPOSITIONS — Does money.deposited in active fund which is not used, become inactive and subject to higher interest rate and is such interest public moneys within purview of Sec. 286 GC?
    First Publication of this Case
    Attorneys — Fillius & Fillius, Warren, for Bank; L. B. Griffith, Warren, and E. C. Turner, Columbus, for State ex.
   The State ex rel contends in Supreme Court that money deposited in bank under active fund for immediated use, which was not used through change in circumstances, can be claimed an inactive fund and that additiosal interest is due thereon; and does interest due upon depository funds constitute public moneys within meaning of Sec. 286 GC?

Note — Motion to certify overruled, 5 Abs. 155.