Case ID: f-appx_219/html/0001-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

INDUSTRIAL ENERGY USERSOHIO, Petitioner v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent American Electric Power Service Corporation, Intervenor.
    No. 05-1435.
    United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
    Feb. 16, 2007.
    Vasiliki Karandrikas, McNees, Wallace & Nurick LLC, Harrisburg, PA, Samuel Charles Randazzo, McNees, Wallace & Nurick, Columbus, OH, Robert A. Weish-aar, Jr., McNees, Wallace & Nurick, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.
    Robert Harris Solomon, John Stewart Moot, Beth Guralnick Paeella, Attorney, Heidi Marie Werntz, Jeffery Scott Dennis, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Steven Jay Ross, Samuel Thomas Perkins, Mice E. Loughran, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Washington, DC, for Interve-nor.
    Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge and SILBERMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
   JUDGMENT

The petition for review of orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission was considered on the briefs and the joint appendix filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition for review is denied for the reasons stated in paragraphs 23-25 of the Commission’s Order Denying Rehearing, 112 F.E.R.C. ¶ 61,320, at 62,432-33 (2005), in which the Commission adequately considered and responded to petitioner’s arguments.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.