Case ID: so2d_410/html/0999-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Josephine DUBINS and Tamara Swali, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 81-168, 81-327.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 16, 1982.
    Bennett Brummer, Public Defender and Barry Weinstein, Asst. Public Defender, for appellants.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Alan T. Lip-son, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Finding that the phrase “competence to consent to treatment” in Section 394.-467(3)(a), Florida Statutes (Supp.1980), is not unconstitutionally vague, indefinite, uncertain or standardless so as to violate the due process clauses of the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Florida, and that no procedural due process right of either appellant was violated by the hearings conducted, we affirm the orders under review in these consolidated appeals.

Affirmed.