Case ID: ohio-law-abs_6/html/0419-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HAMILTON, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SOLOMON v. WAKEM.
    Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist., Butler Co.
    Clinton D. Boyd and Carl J. Mueller, Mid-dletown, for Solomon.
    C. W. Elliott, Middletown, for Wakem.
    1182. TRADE ACCEPTANCES — 163. Bona Fide Purchasers — 480. Evidence.
    Where evidence did not sustain defendant’s claim of bad faith or indorsee of trade acceptances, directed verdict for plaintiff was proper.
   HAMILTON, P. J.

In indorsee’s suit on trade acceptances, where payee, after receiving them in Ohio, sold them to indorsee in Chicago, evidence held not to sustain claim of bad faith on part of plaintiff as indorsee in taking acceptances; hence verdict was properly directed for plaintiff.

(Mills and Cushing, JJ., concur.)

For reference to full opinion, see Omnibus Index, last page, this issue.