Case ID: nys_67/html/1143-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PEOPLE ex rel. MANSFIELD v. HANCOCK et al., Civil Service Com’rs.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    December 11, 1900.)
    Proceedings by the people of the state of New York, on the relation of Edward Mansfield, against John M. Hancock and others, as municipal civil service commissioners of the city of Niagara Falls, N. Y.
   PER CURIAM.

The determination under review wholly confirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements in favor of the respondents, against the relator. Held, that the facts relied upon as grounds for annulling the determination do not sufficiently appear in the return. If such facts existed, a further return should have been directed. Code Civ. Proc. S§ 2135, 2138, 2141, 2143; People v. Wurster, 149 N. Y. 549-554, 44 N. E. 298.