Case ID: f-appx_139/html/0241-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan A. CASTRO ANICO, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 04-15408
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    July 5, 2005.
    Thomas H. Ostrander, Abradenton, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Todd B. Grandy, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Before CARNES, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Thomas H. Ostrander, appointed counsel for Juan A. Castro Anico, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Anico’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.