Case ID: nc_364/html/0425-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. Chief Justice PARKER and Justices TIMMONS-GOODSON and HUDSON", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ROBERT PETER VOGT, JR.
    No. 465A09
    (Filed 8 October 2010)
    . Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 200 N.C. App.-, 685 S.E.2d 23 (2009), affirming an order entered on 3 July 2008 by Judge Beverly T. Beal in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Supreme Court 17 February 2010.
    
      Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Peter A. Regulski, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
    
    
      William D. Aumanfor defendant-appellant.
    
   PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in State v. Bowditch, — N.C. —, — S.E.2d — (2010) (448PA09), the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Chief Justice PARKER and Justices TIMMONS-GOODSON and HUDSON

dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in State v. Bowditch, —N.C. —, — S.E.2d — (2010) (448PA09).

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BILLY RAYMOND ANDERSON

) ) ) ) )

ORDER

No. 269A00

The motions filed by defendant with this Court on 10 August 2010 are determined as follows:

1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Appellant’s Motion Filed in this Court Under the North Carolina Racial Justice Act Without Prejudice to File a Motion Under the Racial Justice Act in Post-Conviction Proceedings If Appellant Is Not [ ] Granted Relief on Direct Appeal or in His Pending MAR filed Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. Sec. 15A-2006 is DISMISSED.
2. Defendant’s Motion in the Alternative to Remand to the Superior Court of Craven County for an Evidentiary Hearing and Other Proceedings is DISMISSED.
3. Defendant’s Motion for Appropriate Relief Pursuant to the Racial Justice Act is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Further proceedings in defendant’s appeal before this Court are stayed until after the trial court’s hearing and determination of defendant’s Motion for Appropriate Relief pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 15A-2005, see, State v. Anderson, 355 N.C. 136, 558 S.E.2d 87 (2002), and defendant’s Motion for Appropriate Relief Pursuant to the Racial Justice Act filed in Superior. Court, Craven County.

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 7th day of September 2010.

Hudson. J.

For the Court

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. IZIAH BARDEN

) ) ) ) )

ORDER

No. 96A01-3

The motions filed by defendant with this Court on 10 August 2010 are determined as follows:

1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Appellant’s Motion Filed in this Court Under the North Carolina Racial Justice Act Without Prejudice tó File a Motion Under-the Racial Justice Act in Post-Conviction Proceedings If Appellant Is Not [ ] Granted Relief on Direct Appeal is DISMISSED.
2. Defendant’s Motion in the Alternative to Remand to the Superior Court of Sampson County for an Evidentiary Hearing and Other Proceedings is DISMISSED.
3. Defendant’s Motion for Appropriate Relief Pursuant to the Racial Justice Act is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Further proceedings in defendant’s appeal before this Court are stayed until after the trial court’s hearing and determination of defendant’s Motion for Appropriate Relief Pursuant to the Racial Justice Act filed in Superior Court, Sampson County.

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 7th day of September 2010.

Hudson. J.

For the Court

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAMES RAY LITTLE III

) ) ) ) )

ORDER

No. 221A09

The motions filed by defendant with this Court on 10 August 2010 are determined as follows:

1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Appellant’s Motion Filed in this Court Under the North Carolina Racial Justice Act Without Prejudice to File a Motion Under the Racial Justice Act in Post-Conviction Proceedings If Appellant Is Not Granted Relief on Direct Appeal is DISMISSED.
2. Defendant’s Motion in the Alternative to Remand to the Superior Court of [Forsyth] County for an Evidentiary Hearing and Other Proceedings is DISMISSED.
3. Defendant’s Motion for Appropriate Relief Pursuant to the Racial Justice Act is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

This case is removed from the 7 September 2010 oral'arguments calendar, and further proceedings in defendant’s appeal before this Court are stayed until after the trial court’s hearing and determination of defendant’s Motion for Appropriate Relief Pursuant to the Racial Justice Act filed in Superior Court, Forsyth County.

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 7th day of September 2010.

Hudson. J.

For the Court

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MICHAEL WAYNE SHERRILL

) ) ) ) )

ORDER

No. 246A09

The motions filed by defendant with this Court on 10 August 2010 are determined as follows:

1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Appellant’s Motion Filed in this Court Under the North Carolina Racial Justice Act Without Prejudice to File a Motion Under the Racial Justice Act in Post-Conviction Proceedings If Appellant Is Not [ ] Granted Relief on Direct Appeal is DISMISSED.
2. Defendant’s Motion in the Alternative to Remand to the Superior Court of Mecklenburg County for an Evidentiary Hearing and Other Proceedings is DISMISSED.
3. Defendant’s Motion for Appropriate Relief Pursuant to the Racial Justice Act is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Further proceedings in defendant’s appeal before this Court are stayed until after the trial court’s hearing and determination of defendant’s Motion for Appropriate Relief Pursuant to the Racial Justice Act filed in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County.

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 7th day of September 2010.

Hudson. J.

For the Court

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HASSON JAMAAL BACOTE

) ) ) ) )

ORDER

No. 360A09

The motions filed by defendant with this Court on 10 August 2010 are determined as follows:

1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Appellant’s Motion filed in this Court Under the North Carolina Racial Justice Act Without Prejudice to File a Motion Under the Racial Justice Act in Post-Conviction Proceedings If Appellant Is Not [ ] Granted Relief on Direct Appeal is DISMISSED.
2. Defendant’s Motion in the Alternative to Remand to the ' Superior Court of [Johnston] County for an Evidentiary Hearing and Other Proceedings is DISMISSED.
3. Defendant’s Motion for Appropriate Relief Pursuant to the Racial Justice Act is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Further proceedings in defendant’s appeal before this Court are stayed until after the trial court’s hearing and determination of defendant’s Motion for Appropriate Relief Pursuant to the Racial Justice Act filed in Superior Court, Johnston County.

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 7th day of September 2010.

Hudson. J.

For the Court

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JOHN ROSWELL REYNOLDS, JR.

) ) ) ) )

ORDER

No. 1P10

The State’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari to review the order of Caswell County, Superior Court, is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding to the trial court for reconsideration in light of Jones v. Keller, 364 N.C. 249, 698 S.E.2d 49 (2010).

By order of this Court in Conference, this 7th day of October, 2010.

Timmons-Goodson. J.

For the Court

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MICHAEL PATRICK RYAN

) ) ) ) )

ORDER

No. 366A10

The motions filed by defendant with this Court on 10 August 2010 are determined as follows:

1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Appellant’s Motion Filed in this Court Under the North Carolina Racial Justice Act Without Prejudice to File a Motion Under the Racial Justice Act in Post-Conviction Proceedings If Appellant Is Not Granted Relief on Direct Appeal is DISMISSED.
2. Defendant’s Motion in the Alternative to Remand to the Superior Court of Gaston County for an Evidentiary Hearing and Other Proceedings is DISMISSED.
3. Defendant’s Motion for Appropriate Relief Pursuant to the Racial Justice Act is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Further proceedings in defendant’s appeal before this Court are stayed until after the trial court’s hearing and determination of defendant’s Motion for Appropriate Relief Pursuant to the Racial Justice Act filed in Superior Court, Gaston County.

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 7th day of September 2010.

Hudson. J.

For the Court

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ANDREW DARRIN RAMSEUR

) ) ) ) )

ORDER

No. 388A10

The motions filed by defendant with this Court on 10 August 2010 are determined as follows:

1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Appellant’s Motion Filed in this Court Under the North Carolina Racial Justice Act Without Prejudice to File a Motion Under the Racial Justice Act in Post-Conviction Proceedings If Appellant Is Not Granted Relief on Direct Appeal is DISMISSED.
2. Defendant’s Motion in the Alternative to Remand to the Superior Court of Iredell County for an Evidentiary Hearing and Other Proceedings is DISMISSED.
3. Defendant’s Motion for Appropriate Relief Pursuant to the Racial Justice Act is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Further proceedings in defendant’s appeal before this Court are stayed until after the trial court’s hearing and determination of defendant’s Motion for Appropriate Relief Pursuant to the Racial Justice Act filed in Superior Court, Iredell County.

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 7th day of September 2010.

Hudson. J.

For the Court