Case ID: sw2d_823/html/0070-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. William Wilbert HAACKE, Defendant/Appellant. William Wilbert HAACKE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    Nos. 57852, 59467.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Nov. 19, 1991.
    
      Loyce Hamilton, St. Louis, for defendant/appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Joseph P. Murray, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a conviction and judgment for manufacturing marijuana in violation of § 195.020, RSMo 1986 (repealed 1989) and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).