Case ID: njl_127/html/0086-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Porter, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ELIZABETH MacPHERSON, PROSECUTOR, v. STATE BOARD OF TAX APPEALS AND CITY OF JERSEY CITY, RESPONDENTS.
    Submitted May 6, 1941 —
    Decided August 9, 1941.
    Before Justices Bodine, Perskie and Porter.
    For the prosecutor, Louis Bcherzer (Meyer Pesin, of counsel).
    Eor the respondents, James A. Hamill (Frank P. McCarthy, of counsel).
   The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.

This certiorari brings before us for review the judgment of the respondent State Board of Tax Appeals which affirmed a tax assessment made by the City of Jersey City for the year 1938 on personal property in the possession of Elizabeth MacPherson, prosecutrix, as administratrix cum testamento awnexo of the estate of Genevieve Clark Berwick who died a resident of Jersey City on December 24th, 1938.

It appears that the assessment was in the sum of $15,000 and that the estate had assets exceeding that amount on the tax day. The assets consisted of cash on deposit in banks.

The prosecutrix argues that the assessment is contrary to the provisions of statute, N. J. S. A. 54:4-3.23, which exempts from taxation cash on hand or on deposit in banks, &c.

To avail herself of this exemption it was an indispensable prerequisite for the prosecutrix to have hied a sworn claim of such exemption as provided for in N. J. S. A. 54:4-15. Cf. Hardin v. Morgan, 70 N. J. L. 484; affirmed, 71 Id. 342; Union Waxed and Parchment Pager Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 73 N. J. L. 374. This she did not do and for that reason the respondent was right in disallowing the exemption and in affirming the assessment.

The writ is dismissed, with costs.