Case ID: so2d_626/html/0654-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Curtis Lee McCRAY, Respondent. Curtis Lee McCRAY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    Nos. 80966, 81035.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Oct. 28, 1993.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., James W. Rogers, Bureau Chief, Crim. Appeals, and Charlie McCoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for petitioner, cross-respondent.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Lynn A. Williams, Asst. Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, for respondent, cross-petitioner.
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review McCray v. State, 609 So.2d 159 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), in which the district court certified a question of great public importance. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We answered the certified question in State v. Johnson, 616 So.2d 1 (Fla.1993). On the authority of Johnson, we approve the decision under review. It is not necessary to discuss the issues raised by the cross-petition.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.