Case ID: fla_146/html/0560-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

City of Hollywood, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. State ex rel. Davis, Attorney General, and Salida Investment Company, et al. Defendants in Error.
    1 So. (2nd) 574
    En Banc
    Opinion Filed April 8, 1941
    
      John W. Whelan, for Plaintiff in Error;
    /. Tom W,atson, Attorney General, and Chas. H: Crim, for Defendants in Error.
   Per Curiam.

This is a quo warranto proceeding to oust certain lands from the jurisdiction of the City of Dania and the City of Hollywood. The Court below granted the relief prayed for. The record and the briefs have been examined and each question raised carefully considered but we find nothing that has not been adjudicated by former opinions on the subject. The judgment appealed from was fair and just and is in all respects affirmed.

Affirmed.

Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Terrell, Buford, Chapman, Thomas and Adams, J. J., concur.