Case ID: nys_35/html/1108-12.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HEERWAGEN et al., Respondents, v. RITZMANN, Appellant.
    (Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.
    December 2, 1895.)
    Action by Arnold Heerwagen and another against Charles L. Ritzmann. Motion for reargument of appeal.
   PER CURIAM.

The present motion does not conform to rule 16 of the general term of this court, with regard to motions for reargument. Counsel in effect simply desires to present a more elaborate argument upon the exception which the general term deemed fatal to the judgment, and it does not appear that any question decisive of the ease has been overlooked. Motion denied, with $10 costs.