Case ID: nys_84/html/1136-11.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MURPHY, Respondent, v. MILLIKEN et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    November 25, 1903.)
    Action by Patrick Murphy against Edward F. Milliken and Foster Milliken.
   PER CURIAM.

The statement in the opinion that there was no evidence that Finck signaled at all was too broad. But that statement is not necessary to support the conclusion, reached. It is enough that there was no definite or satisfactory evidence that Finck signaled prematurely. Motion for reargument denied.