Case ID: or_310/html/0774-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Submitted on record and briefs October 23,
    the decision of the Court of Appeals and the judgment of the circuit court reversed, and remanded to circuit court for further proceedings November 26, 1990
    SANDRA FRIAR, Petitioner on Review, v. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review.
    
    (CC 16-89-03424; CA A61784; SC S37495)
    801 P2d 138
    George W. Kelly, Eugene, filed the petition for petitioner on review.
    Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the response to the petition for respondent on review. With him on the response were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
   MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this post-conviction case, the Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the circuit court without opinion. Friar v. State of Oregon, 103 Or App 130, 796 P2d 401 (1990). After the petition for review was allowed, the state filed a response confessing error, stating,

“Consequently, the state agrees that this case should be remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings, in which further testimony need not be taken, but in which the court should reconsider its decision, in the light of petitioner’s testimony concerning her state of mind at the time of her entry of plea.”

Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals and the judgment of the circuit court are reversed. This case is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings.