Case ID: sw2d_864/html/0955-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James FENNER, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. PULITZER PUBLISHING COMPANY, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
    No. 62915.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Nov. 16, 1993.
    David S. Ware, St. Louis, for appellant.
    John J. Larsen, Jr., St. Louis, for respondent.
    J. Patrick Chassaing, Keith K. Cheung, St. Louis, for Treasurer of Mo. as custodian of the Second Injury Fund.
    Before CARL R. GAERTNER, P.J., and CRANE and CRAHAN, JJ. '
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

These appeals arise out of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s award in a worker’s compensation claim. Both the claimant, James Fenner, and the employer, Pulitzer Publishing Company, appeal from the Commission’s award. These appeals were consolidated into this action. We affirm the Commission’s award.

An opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no prec-edential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only. This memorandum sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed according to Rule 84.16(b).