Case ID: ny-super-ct_46/html/0580-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ADOLPH QUETTING, Appellant, v. THE DRY DOCK, &c., R. R. CO., Respondent.
    Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., Speir and Russell, JJ..
    
      Decided December 6, 1880.
    Appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict of the jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial on the minutes.
    
      A. H. Stoiber, attorney, and T. H. Smith, of counsel, for appellant.
    
      Robinson & Scribner, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We see no ground, upon an examination of the evidence and the exceptions in this case, for interference with the verdict of the jury.

The judgment and the order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.