Case ID: so2d_582/html/0173-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Elizabeth CUNNINGHAM, Fred N. Harris, James Paul, III, George A. McCoy, Wilma S. Smith, Clifford Brown, Judith Brown, Charles O’Neal, Herman Harris, Hobart G. Creamer, S. Ross Williams, Sr., Nathan P. McLaughlin, Henry Caudill, Jesse D. O’Neal, James E. Lewis, Mary Jane Creamer, Denise Barbara Williams, Joseph N. Hogue, Dinah M. Taylor, Mary Masters, and Teresa Cooner, Appellants, v. ANCHOR HOCKING CORP., a Delaware corporation, formerly known as “Anchor Hocking Glass Corp.”, Anchor Hocking Glass Container Corp., a Delaware corporation, formerly known as “Anchor Hocking Corp.”, and Anchor Glass Container Corporation, a corporation, formerly known as Anchor Hocking Glass Corporation, Appellees.
    No. 89-2072.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    July 18, 1991.
    
      Tyrie A. Boyer of Boyer, Tanzler & Boyer, Jacksonville, for appellants.
    Alan C. Sundberg and Sylvia H. Walbolt of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, P.A., Tampa, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order awarding defendants/appellees costs. That order was entered subsequent to a final order dismissing with prejudice the multi-count complaint of plaintiffs/appellants. An appeal was taken to this court from the order of dismissal. Subsequently, the instant appeal was taken to this court from the costs order. In light of the court’s disposition of the dismissal order in Cunningham v. Anchor Hocking Corporation, 558 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), rev. denied, 574 So.2d 139 (Fla.1991), we reverse the order awarding costs.

REVERSED.

NIMMONS and ALLEN, JJ., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.