Case ID: njl_87/html/0315-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BURLINGTON DISTILLING COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. STATE BOARD OF ASSESSORS, APPELLANT.
    Submitted December 5, 1914—
    Decided March 1, 1915.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 86 N. J. L. 92.
    For the respondent, Harrison H. Voorhees.
    
    For the appellant, John W. Wescott, attorney-general.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, White, Terhune, Williams, JJ. 7.

For reversal—The Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Heppenheimer, JJ. 6.