Case ID: pa-super_28/html/0494-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Campbell v. Harton, Appellant.
    July 13, 1095:
    Argued May 3, 1905.
    Appeal, No. 236, April T., 1905, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1902, No. 815, on verdict for plaintiff in case of S. J. Campbell v. William E. Harton, Contractor, and William E. Hildebrand, owner, with notice to Frank P. Howley.
    Before Beaver, Porter, Morrison and Henderson, JJ.
    Appeal quashed.
   Per Curiam,

This case was tried at the same time in the court below as Hartón v. Hartón, ante, p. 492. It was argued in this court also at the same time.

The indorsement “Bill sealed for defendants generally” is made upon the opinion of the court, refusing a new trial. It is not dated, and, whenever and however made, is no more than in No. 235 a compliance with our rule.

For the reasons therein stated, therefore, the motion to quash must be allowed. Appeal quashed.