Case ID: f-appx_500/html/0952-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Christoph GESKES.
    No. 2012-1390.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    March 19, 2013.
    Mark B. Harrison, Venable, LLP, of Washington, DC, for appellant. With him on the brief was Michael E. Hall.
    Raymond T. Chen, Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, for appellee. With him on the brief were Thomas L. Casag-rande and Christina J. Hieber, Associate Solicitors.
    NEWMAN, PLAGER, and PROST, Circuit Judges.
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.