Case ID: nj_54/html/0579-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. VICTOR PACHECO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued November 5, 1969
    Decided November 17, 1969.
    
      Mrs. Miriam N. Span, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for the appellant {Mr. Stanley G. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).
    
      Mr. Ruston H. Ridgway, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent {Mr. Joseph Tuso, Cumberland County Prosecutor, attorney).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division, 106 N. J. Super. 540.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weirtraub and Justices Jacobs, Erakcis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Hake-mar — 7.

For reversal — None.