Case ID: nj_61/html/0515-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT DRAUGHN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued October 25, 1972
    Decided November 6, 1972.
    
      Mr. Edward Weisslitz, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Stanley G. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney.)
    
      Mr. Michael Stieber, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Essex County Prosecutor, attorney; Mr. David Noah Dubrow, Assistant Prosecutor, on the brief.)
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division, 121 N. J. Super. 64 is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in its opinion.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub, Justices Jacobs, Hall and Mountain, and Judge Conford — 5.

For reversal — None.