Case ID: f-appx_357/html/0546-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David HARWOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Deborah A. Hickey, Warden, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 09-1918.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 15, 2009.
    Decided: Dec. 17, 2009.
    David Harwood, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Horn, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Harwood appeals the magistrate judge’s order dismissing his Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2006) action against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the magistrate judge’s order. See Harwood v. United States, No. 1:08-cv-00060, 2009 WL 2215080 (S.D.W.Va. July 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).