Case ID: nj-eq_100/html/0584-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

City of Newark, complainant, v. Hugh. F. Cook et al., defendants.
    [Decided January 31st, 1927.]
    On appeal of Louis K. Liggett Company.
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, whose opinion is reported in 99 N. J. Eq. 527.
    
    
      Messrs. Lindabury, Depue & Paulies, for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. McCarter & English, Messrs. Stein, Stein £ Hannoch and Mr. Cecil II. MacMahon, for the defendants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Min-turn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell,' Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.