Case ID: ad2d_94/html/0676-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Silverman, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(May 20, 1983)
    In the Matter of Michael A. Oliveras et al., Appellants, v Matteo Lumetta et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Yolanda Rivera, Respondent-Respondent. Yolanda Rivera, Respondent, and Matteo Lumetta et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, v Michael A. Oliveras et al., Appellants.
   — Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dorothy Kent, J.), entered on May 18, 1983, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Bloom, Fein and Alexander, JJ.

Silverman, J.,

dissents in a memorandum as follows: I would reverse and invalidate the nomination. The subscribing witness’ attestations on Sheets Nos. 69 and 79 are internally inconsistent to the point of invalidating the sheets; either the date of the attestations or the number of signatures attested to must be false.