Case ID: f3d_451/html/0938-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SMITH, Circuit Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Raymond JOHNSON, Appellant, v. Michael KEMNA, Appellee.
    No. 05-1041.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 13, 2006.
    Filed: June 29, 2006.
    
      Kevin L. Schriener, argued, Clayton, Missouri, for appellant.
    Ronald S. Ribaudo, argued, Jefferson City, Missouri, for appellee.
    Before SMITH, HEANEY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
   SMITH, Circuit Judge.

Raymond Johnson appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court dismissed Johnson’s petition as untimely filed, finding that it was filed over one month past the deadline imposed by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1).

AEDPA requires a state prisoner seeking federal habeas corpus relief to file his federal petition within one year after his state conviction becomes final. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). However, this limitations period does not include the time during which a properly filed application for state post-conviction review is “pending” in state courts. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2). The recent decision of this court in Payne v. Kemna, 441 F.3d 570 (8th Cir.2006), which both parties agree is controlling in this matter, instructs that an application for state post-conviction review, under Missouri law, is pending until the mandate is issued. 441 F.3d at 572. When that date is taken into consideration, there is no dispute that Johnson’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus was timely filed before the district court. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment dismissing Johnson’s habeas petition as untimely is reversed, and this case is remanded for further proceedings. See 8th Cir. R. 47(b). 
      
      . Considering the 19 days that elapsed between when Johnson's state conviction became final, June 20, 1998, and the date he initiated post-conviction relief proceedings in state court, July 9, 1998, only 358 days passed between the issuance of the mandate on June 2, 2003, and his filing of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court on May 5, 2004, thus making his petition timely filed.