Case ID: so2d_814/html/0308-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. COBB, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Terell SMITH v. STATE.
    CR-00-0697.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    Sept. 28, 2001.
    Ray L. Huffstutler, Birmingham, for appellant.
    Bill Pryor, atty. gen., and Cecil G. Bren-dle, Jr., asst. atty. gen., for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

McMILLAN, P.J., and BASCHAB and WISE, JJ., concur. COBB, J., concurs in part and dissents in part, with opinion, which SHAW, J., joins.

COBB, Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur to affirm the appellant’s conviction. However, because the § 13A-12-250 and § 13A-12-270, Ala.Code (1975), enhancements were applied, I would reverse the sentence and remand the case for re-sentencing in accordance with Judge Shaw’s special writing in Poole v. State, [Ms. CR-99-1200, August 31, 2001] - So.2d - (Ala.Crim.App.2001), with which I concurred as to this issue. As to those points on which I disagree with Judge Shaw, see my special writing in Poole, - So.2d at -.