Case ID: ad2d_19/html/0776-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rochester Park, Inc., Respondent, v. City of Rochester, Appellant.
   — Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: While section 508 ultimately might be found to be unambiguous, Even in the ease of an integrated written contract, the meaning of the words may depend upon various surrounding circumstances that are in dispute; the circumstances must be found as a fact before interpretation can proceed.” (3 Corbin, Contracts, § 554, p. 223.) We pass on no other questions. (Appeal from order of Monroe, Special Term, denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment and for a. declaratory judgment.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ. [38 Misc 2d 714.]