Case ID: so2d_641/html/0930-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John PRIMM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 94-1249.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Aug. 17, 1994.
    Rehearing Denied Sept. 20, 1994.
    John Primm, pro se.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Sharon A. Wood, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We find appellant’s Notice of Appeal to be timely filed pursuant to Haag v. State, 591 So.2d 614 (Fla.1992).

Having considered appellant’s brief and the record, we find no error in the trial court’s denial of appellant’s criminal rule 3.850 motion without evidentiary hearing.

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.