Case ID: mich-app_11/html/0643-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PEOPLE v. JOHNSON.
    Criminal Law — Uttering and Publishing — Eorged Check.
    Evidence in prosecution for uttering and publishing forged check held, sufficient to find defendant guilty of offense charged beyond reasonable doubt.
    Reference for Points in Headnote
    36 Am Jur 2d, Forgery § 47 et seq.
    
    Appeal from Macomb, Noe (Alton II.), J.
    Submitted Division 2 April 2, 1968, at Lansing.
    (Docket No. 2,616.)
    Decided June 10, 1968.
    Leave to appeal denied August 15, 1968.
    See 381 Mich 771.
    Richard Lee Johnson was convicted of uttering and publishing a forged check.
    Affirmed.
    
      Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, George N. Parris,
    
      Prosecuting Attorney, Thaddeus F. Maniera, Chief Appellate Lawyer, and Stephen F. Osinski, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.
    
      Martin J. Smith, for defendant.
   Per Curiam.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of the crime of uttering and publishing a forged check, CL 1948, § 750.249 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.446). He appeals.

We have concluded from our examination of the record and briefs that defendant’s allegations of error are without merit. The people presented sufficient evidence to find defendant guilty of the offense charged beyond a -reasonable doubt.

Affirmed.

Lbsinski, C. J., and T. Gr. Kavanagh and T. J. Foley, JJ., concurred.