Case ID: so2d_741/html/0392-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SEE, Justice. MADDOX, Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte Donna Marie Mott HOVEY. (Re Reggie James Mott v. Donna Marie Mott Hovey).
    1971544.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    June 25, 1999.
    Kelli D. Taylor-Etheredge of Huntley, Jordan & Associates, P.C., Mobile, for petitioner.
    Floyd C. Enfínger, Jr., Montrose, for respondent.
   SEE, Justice.

The petition is denied on the authority of Ex parte Jenkins, 723 So.2d 649 (Ala. 1998).

WRIT DENIED.

HOOPER, C.J., and LYONS and BROWN, JJ., concur.

MADDOX, J., concurs specially.

MADDOX, Justice

(concurring specially).

The Court, in denying the writ of mandamus, relies on Ex parte Jenkins, 723 So.2d 649 (Ala.1998). While I concur in denying the writ, I point out that I did not concur with all of the main opinion in Jenkins. For a better understanding of my views on the law applicable in cases such as this, see my special writing in that case.