Case ID: njl_136/html/0639-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE DE MOTT HOMES AT SALEM, INC., ETC., RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF MARGATE CITY, ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS.
    Argued February 5, 1948
    Decided February 19, 1948.
    For the appellant, Winne & Barita (Walter G. Winne, of counsel).
    For the respondents, Perskie & Perskie (Joseph B. Perskie, of counsel).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Eastwood in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Bodine, Donges, Wachenfeld, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 10.

For reversal — The Chief Justice, Heher, JJ. 2.