Case ID: f-appx_440/html/0516-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Mark L. FLAAEN, Appellant.
    No. 11-2651.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 23, 2011.
    Filed: Dec. 7, 2011.
    Anita L. Burns, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Kansas City, MO (Raymond C. Conrad, Jr., Fed. Public Defender, on the brief), for appellant.
    Mark L. Flaaen, Coleman, FL, pro se.
    Rudolph R. Rhodes IV, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, MO, for appellee.
    Before LOKEN, BYE, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Mark Flaaen appeals the sentence the district court imposed after revoking his supervised release. We conclude that the revocation sentence of 20 months in prison with 40 months of supervised release was not unreasonable. We decline to review at this time Flaaen’s arguments regarding ineffective assistance of counsel and sentence credit. See United States v. Davis, 452 F.3d 991, 994 (8th Cir.2006); United States v. Pardue, 363 F.3d 695, 699 (8th Cir.2004). With respect to Flaaen’s remaining arguments, we find no plain error. See Davis, 452 F.3d at 994 (describing plain-error review); see also United States v. Asalati, 615 F.3d 1001, 1007-08 (8th Cir.2010) (upholding curfew condition of supervised release).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. 
      
      . The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.