Case ID: f-appx_584/html/0068-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jermaine BOLDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY LLC, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 14-1319.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 23, 2014.
    Decided: Sept. 30, 2014.
    Jermaine Bolden, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Cantrell, McCABE WEIS-BERG & CONWAY, LLC, Laurel, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jermaine Bolden appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider and amend his complaint alleging violations of consumer protection laws. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bolden v. McCabe, No. 8:13-cv-01265-DKC (D.Md. Mar. 13, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.