Case ID: f-appx_463/html/0195-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronald BRUNSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendant—Appellee. Ronald Brunson, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. United States District Court, District of South Carolina; Central Intelligence Agency; Federal Bureau of Investigation; Steve Patterson, Intercity Broadcasting; NAACP, National Association Advancement Colored People; State Executive Director, NAACP; President Ruby Johnson, Defendants—Appellees.
    Nos. 11-2088, 11-2097.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 31, 2012.
    Decided: Feb. 2, 2012.
    Ronald Brunson, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
   Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated cases, Ronald Brunson seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s reports recommending that the district court, dismiss Brunson’s complaints. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Brunson seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor are they appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.