Case ID: sw2d_979/html/0211-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SWEET SURRENDER, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE AMERICAN BAGEL COMPANY, d/b/a Chesapeake Bagel Bakery System, et al., Defendant-Respondent.
    No. 73477.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Sept. 22, 1998.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 6, 1998.
    Green, Schaaf & Margo, P.C., Martin M. Green, David T. Butsch, Clayton, for appellant.
    Don R. Sherman, Lori R. Koch, Goffstein, Raskas, Pomerantz, Sherman, Ruthmeyer & Susman, L.L.C., St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before HOFF, P. J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.
    
      
      . The trial court dismissed other parties to this lawsuit, and those parties are not before us on appeal.
    
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sweet Surrender, Inc. (Surrender) appeals from the trial court’s granting of the motion to dismiss filed by The American Bagel Company, d/b/a Chesapeake Bagel Bakery System (Bagel). Bagel urged the court had no subject matter jurisdiction due to the forum selection clauses contained in the agreements between these parties.

Forum selection clauses should be enforced “unless it is unfair or unreasonable to do so.” High Life Sales Co. v. Brown-Forman Corp., 823 S.W.2d 493, 494 (Mo. banc 1992).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).