Case ID: nys_50/html/1125-10.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

COMMERCIAL BANK, Respondent, v. FOLTZ et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    February 6, 1898.)
    Action by the Commercial Bank against Moses Foltz and Beaman Catto, impleaded, etc.
   No opinion. Order of July 2d, denying motion to correct an order granted June 11, 1896, and order denying motion to strike out Catto’s amended answer, and denying motion to vacate another order granted June 11, 1896, which vacated an order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out the amended answer of Catto, affirmed, without costs to either party. See 41 N. Y. Supp. 183.