Case ID: sw2d_936/html/0866-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Janet R. LINEHAN, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Gerald J. LINEHAN, Respondent-Appellant.
    No. 69380.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Jan. 7, 1997.
    Paul H. Schramm, Daniel R. Schramm, St. Louis, for respondent-appellant.
    Charles P. Todt, Christian A. Stiegemeyer, St. Louis, for petitioner-respondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals firom the judgment and order of the trial court granting his motion to modify the maintenance awarded to Wife. Husband alleges the trial court erred because the maintenance award, although lowered from $2500 per month to $2000 per month, was still excessive. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum detailing our reasons for affirming the judgment of the trial court. Rule 84.16(b).