Case ID: ohio-st-3d_62/html/0252-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Burkhart.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Burkhart (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 252.]
    (No. 91-1769
    Submitted October 9, 1991
    Decided December 18, 1991.)
    
      
      J. Warren Bettis, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, for relator.
    
      Spengler, Nathanson, Heyman, McCarthy & Durfee and Frank T. Pizza, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We find that respondent committed the misconduct found by the board and concur with its recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.