Case ID: ad2d_249/html/0930-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Ellen Palacz, Appellant, v Richard Palacz et al., Respondents.
    [672 NYS2d 575]
   —Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court did not err in dismissing the petition alleging that Richard Palacz (respondent) violated the visitation provisions of a prior order by his conduct on January 7, 1997. Under the circumstances, no hearing was required (see, Bowie v Bowie, 182 AD2d 1049, 1050). We agree with the court’s conclusion that the single alleged violation apparently arising from a conflict between the visitation schedule and the child’s academic needs, if established, would be too insubstantial to support the conclusion that respondent “defeated, impaired, impeded, or preju-

diced” petitioner’s visitation rights (Judiciary Law § 753 [A]) and thus would not warrant the imposition of sanctions. The court’s admonition to respondent was sufficient in this instance. (Appeal from Order of Livingston County Family Court, Cicoria, J. — Visitation.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.