Case ID: ad_171/html/0935-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hirsh & Schofield, Inc., Appellant, v. Aage Gusmer, Respondent.
    Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 10th day of November, 1915, denying a motion for the continuance of a temporary injunction pendente lite.
    
   Per Curiam:

Without determining whether or not the plaintiff would be entitled to an injunction by final judgment after a trial of the action, we think the court was justified in refusing to continue the temporary injunction. The order appealed from is, therefore, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Smith, JJ. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.