Case ID: so2d_866/html/0188-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

S.D., Appellant, v. C.A.T., Appellee.
    No. 2D03-302.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Feb. 20, 2004.
    Edward J. Page, Henry G. Gyden, and Robert E. Biasotti of Carlton Fields, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.
    Alexander Caballero, Tampa, and Ingrid Anderson, Clearwater, of Sessums, Mason & Black, P.A., for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

All issues raised by S.D. are either without merit or subject to the law of the case doctrine. See S.D. v. C.A.T., 761 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Accordingly, the only issue on remand is the determination of the amount of child support.

Affirmed.

WHATLEY, KELLY, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.