Case ID: ohio-st-2d_69/html/0108-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bar Association of Greater Cleveland v. Nesbitt.
    [Cite as Bar Assn, of Greater Cleveland v. Nesbitt (1982), 69 Ohio St. 2d 108.]
    (D.D. No. 81-10 —
    Decided February 3, 1982.)
    
      
      Mr. William J. Coyne, Mr. A. Richard Valore and Mr. Seymour R. Brown, for relator.
    
      Mr. Milt Schulman, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

After a careful examination and review of the record in this cause, this court concurs with the findings and conclusion of the board that respondent violated DR 5-103(A) and DR 5404(A).

It is the judgment of this court that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky JJ., concur.