Case ID: so2d_696/html/1293-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ruth Bates PROCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 95-04353.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 16, 1997.
    James Marion Moorman, Pubhc Defender, and Jeffrey M. Pearlman, Assistant Pubhc Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for AppeUee.
   PER CURIAM.

Ruth Bates Prock pleaded nolo contendere to the manufacture of cannabis and was sentenced to eighteen months probation. We have reviewed this ease according to our obhgation under In re Anders Briefs, 581 So.2d 149 (Fla.1991), and affirm Prock’s judgment. We strike from her sentence, however, the $2 cost imposed pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), because it was not orally imposed at the sentencing hearing. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111, 117 (Fla. 2d DCA1995).

Affirmed as modified.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.