Case ID: f3d_92/html/1561-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PARK ’N GO OF GA., INC., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 94-8989.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Aug. 29, 1996.
    C. David Johnston, Adam J. Conti, Wagner & Johnston, P.C., Atlanta, GA, for Appellant.
    Ben Kingree, III, Kenton Jones Coppage, Carter & Ansley, Atlanta, GA, for Appellee.
    Before HATCHETT and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges, and GIBSON , Senior Circuit Judge.
    
      
       Honorable John R. Gibson, Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM:

Appellant Park ’N Go appealed the grant of summary judgment to United States Fidelity & Guaranty (USF & G), arguing the district court erroneously concluded that USF & G’s liability was limited to $250,000 and therefore erroneously granted summary judgment in favor of Appellee. We — pursuant to Ga. Const, art. VI, § 6 para. 4; O.C.G.A. § 15-2-9; and Rule 37 of the Supreme Court of Georgia — certified to the Supreme Court of Georgia the question of USF & G’s liability. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Park ’N Go of Georgia, Inc., 66 F.3d 273 (11th Cir.1995).

The Supreme Court has answered the certified question in the affirmative. Park ’N Go of Georgia, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 266 Ga. 787, 471 S.E.2d 500 (1996). In the light of the Supreme Court of Georgia’s opinion, we affirm the decision of the district court.

AFFIRMED.