Case ID: njl_82/html/0728-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cukiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. HORACE CODINGTON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued June Term, 1911
    Decided June 26, 1911.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 51 Vroom 496.
    Por the plaintiff in error, William V. Steals.
    
    Por the defendant in error, Frederick A. Pope, prosecutor of the pleas.
   Pee Cukiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chief Justice in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellob, Gaeeison, Swayze, Bebgen, Vookhees, Kalisch, Bogeet, Ykedenbuegh, •Congdon, Sullivan, White, JJ. 11.

For reversal—None.