Case ID: f-appx_22/html/0184-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lance Bishop STEGLICH, a/k/a Robert Rock, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 01-4423.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 14, 2001.
    Decided Nov. 21, 2001.
    Peter J. Schwartz, Walter F. Green, IV, Law Office of Walter Green, Harrison-burg, VA, for appellant. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, VA, for appellee.
    Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Lance Bishop Steglich appeals his 200-month sentence imposed after a guilty plea to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1994). We review a district court’s findings of fact for clear error and give due deference to the district court’s application of the guidelines to the facts. United States v. Daughtrey, 874 F.2d 213, 217 (4th Cir.1989). Finding no error, we affirm.

Steglich’s only assignment of error on appeal is that the district court erred in applying a two-point offense level enhancement for committing the instant offense while under a criminal sentence. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4Al.l(d) (2000). We find there was sufficient evidence to support the enhancement. Accordingly, we affirm Steglich’s sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.