Case ID: f3d_798/html/1242-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Fauzia DIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John F. KERRY, Secretary of State; Jeh Johnson, Secretary of Homeland Security; Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States; Richard Olson, Ambassador of the United States Embassy, Islamabad, Pakistan; Christopher Richard, Consul General of the Consular Section at the United States Embassy, Islamabad, Pakistan; P. Michael McKinley, Ambassador of the United States Embassy, Kabul, Afghanistan, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 10-16772.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Aug. 26, 2015.
    Heidi C. Larson Howell, Sidley Austin LLP, Geoffrey D. Deboskey, Esquire, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Sin Yen Ling, Esquire, Asian Law Caucus, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    lia C. Deiss, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, Stacey llene Young, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for DefendantAppellee.
    Before: RICHARD R. CLIFTON and MARY H. MURGUIA, Circuit Judges, and RANER C. COLLINS, District Judge.
    
    
      
       Current cabinet members and diplomatic officers have been substituted for their predecessors pursuant to Rule 43(c)(2) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
    
    
      
       The Honorable Raner C. Collins, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.
    
   ORDER

In light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Kerry v. Din, — U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 2128, 192 L.Ed.2d 183 (2015), the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.