Case ID: njl_110/html/0529-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ANNA VAN BLUNK, RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES REAL ESTATE COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS.
    Argued February 14, 1933
    Decided April 28, 1933.
    Por the respondent, Oscar LeWine.
    
    Por the appellant, Thompson & Eanstein.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Heher, Van Buskir'k, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, J J. 11.

For reversal — None.