Case ID: f-appx_30/html/0174-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael O. DEVAUGHN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dan L. DOVE, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 01-7206.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 21, 2002.
    Decided March 4, 2002.
    Michael O. DeVaughn, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Michael O. DeVaughn seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994), as a motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001), and dismissing his action without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. DeVaughn v. Dove, No. CA-00-3546-4-17BF (D.S.C. June 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.