Case ID: f-appx_102/html/0597-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Terrill LOVE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. PINNACLE NISSAN, INC.; ABC Nissan; Automotive Investment Group, Inc.; and VT, Inc., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 02-15511.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted May 13, 2003.
    Submission Vacated May 22, 2003.
    Resubmitted June 22, 2004.
    Decided June 22, 2004.
    
      Stephen G. Montoya, Esq., Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    Lonnie J. Williams, Jr., Esq., Quarles & Brady Streich Lang LLP, Phoenix, AZ, Laura M. Franze, Esq., Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Dallas, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: HAWKINS and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and BREYER, District Judge.
    
    
      
       The Honorable Charles R. Breyer, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Terrill Love filed a racial harassment and constructive discharge claim against Pinnacle Nissan under the 1991 amendments to 42 U.S.C. § 1981. The district court dismissed Love’s claim under Arizona’s two-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims and Love appealed to this court. While submission of the appeal was pending, the Supreme Court decided Jones v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 1836, — L.Ed.2d - (2004), holding that claims for racial harassment and constructive discharge pursuant to a post-1990 amendment to § 1981 are governed by the federal “catchall” four-year statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 1658, which preempts application of any state law statutes of limitation. — U.S. at ---, 124 S.Ct. at 1844-46. We accordingly reverse the district court’s dismissal of this case and remand for proceedings in accordance with the proper statute of limitations.

REVERSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.