Case ID: ny_175/html/0481-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles A. McCredy, Respondent, v. Daniel Woodcock, as Attorney for Granville F. Dailey et al., Appellant.
    
      McCredy v. Woodcock, 73 App. Div. 630, affirmed.
    (Argued May 8, 1903;
    decided May 22, 1903.)
    Appeal from a judgment entered June 27, 1902, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department overruling defendant’s exceptions ordered to be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division and directing judgment for the plaintiff upon the verdict. »
    
      Peroival 8. Menken for appellant. '
    
      Frederic R. Coudert, Jr., and John P. Murra/y for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of Hatch v. Central Nat. Bank (78 N. Y. 487); no opinion.

Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Yann, JJ.