Case ID: nj-eq_103/html/0018-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harry Pinsky & Son Company, appellant, v. Edgar L. Wike, treasurer, &c., et al., respondents.
    [Decided May 14th, 1928.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.
    
      Mr. D. Trueman Stachhouse, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Albert 8: Woodruff, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from -will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning, and reported in 101 N. J. Eq. 45.

■ For affirmance — The Ciiiee-Justice, Trenchard, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Parker, Minturn, JJ. 2.