Case ID: so2d_567/html/0554-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sarah Jane COBB, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 90-1683.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Oct. 8, 1990.
    
      David Davis, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Jim Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Huff v. State, 566 So.2d 945 (Fla. 1st DCA, 1990); Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315. We certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance:

DOES A DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATION RESULT FROM THE IMPOSITION OF A PROBATIONARY SPLIT SENTENCE WHEN THE LEGISLATURE HAS NOT EXPLICITLY AUTHORIZED THAT DISPOSITION IN THE SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES FOR SECTION 921.087, FLORIDA STATUTES.

SHIVERS, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.