Case ID: f-appx_486/html/0373-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric STUDWELL, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 11-7731.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 26, 2012.
    Decided: Nov. 1, 2012.
    Eric Studwell, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
    Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Studwell appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Studwell, No. 4:04-cr00056-RBS-FBS-1 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 29, 2011; entered Nov. 30, 2011). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.