Case ID: sc_306/html/0481-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

23512
    Mendel SACHS and Yetty Sachs, Petitioners v. K.W. REALTY GROUP, a Consortium of West Virginia Limited Partnerships d/b/a Waipani II Resort and Beach Club and Sea Island Properties, Inc., Respondents.
    (413 S.E. (2d) 9)
    Supreme Court
    
      Brian P. Gibbes, of Law Offices of Gibbes and Gibbes, Hilton Head Island, for petitioners.
    
    
      Michael W. Battle, of Lovelace and Battle, Conway, for respondents.
    
    Heard Oct. 22, 1991;
    Decided Nov. 12, 1991.
    Reh. Den. Feb. 4, 1992.
   ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Per Curiam:

Petitioners ask the Court to consider “after discovered” evidence in reviewing the Court of Appeals’ decision in Sachs v. K.W. Realty Group, et al., Unpublished Opinion No. 91-UP-022 (Ct. App. filed January 16,1991). We now dismiss the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted, finding that this evidence does not constitute “after discovered” evidence. See Ortowski v. Ortowski, 237 S.C. 499, 117 S.E. (2d) 860 (1961).

Dismissed.