Case ID: miss_168/html/0691-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Griffith, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nash v. Stanley.
    (In Banc.
    Jan. 22, 1934.)
    [152 So. 294.
    No. 30866.]
    Blair & Anderson and Claude F. Clayton, all of Tupelo, for appellant.
    
      J. W. P. Boggan, of Tupelo, for appellee.
   Griffith, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The principles of law applicable to this case are well settled; hence only the findings of fact by the chancellor are involved in review. There is sufficient proof to support the decree and we are, therefore, without authority to reverse.

Affirmed.

Anderson, J., takes no part.