Case ID: pa_320/html/0203-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Linn,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Putnam, Appellant, v. United Traction Company of Pittsburgh Putnam, Jr., Appellant, v. United Traction Company of Pittsburgh. Marietta Realty Company, Appellant, v. United Traction Company of Pittsburgh. Bryce, Appellant, v. United Traction Company of Pittsburgh.
    November 25, 1935:
    (No. 2).
    Argued October 10, 1935.
    Before Frazer, O. J., Kephart, Schaffer, Maxey, Drew, Linn and Barnes, JJ.
    
      John M. Reed, for appellants.
    
      Robert L. Kirkpatrick, with him Edwin W. Smith, of Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay and Maynard Teall and E. P. Griffiths, for appellee.
   Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

These appeals were argued together and will be determined in one opinion. They involve the same questions disposed of in Ernest A. Frey v. United Traction Co. of Pittsburgh, 320 Pa. 196. We consider the records amended by marking the suits to the use (as stated in Frey’s Appeal).

The orders appealed from are reversed, the records are remitted to the end that judgment he entered for the plaintiff for such sum as to right and justice may belong unless other legal or equitable cause be shown to the court below why such judgment should not be so entered.