Case ID: nj_18/html/0457-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FRANCIS O’BRIEN, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. DADE BROS., INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND MARINE WAREHOUSEMEN’S LOCAL NO. 1478, ETC., DEFENDANT.
    Decided May 23, 1955.
    
      
      Mr. Thomas J. Brogan argued the cause for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Wallace P. Berhowitz argued the cause for the respondents (Mr. Sherwin D. Lester, on the brief).
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam, filed in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Wachenfeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan — 7.

For reversal — None.