Case ID: f-appx_466/html/0195-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gerald HENNEGHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jonathan ROACH; Kristine Roach, a/k/a Krissy Roach, a/k/a Joy Roach; Fedex Corporation; Fedex Office, Defendants—Appellees, and Frederick W. Smith, Chief Executive Officer, Fedex Corporation; Brian D. Phillips, Chief Executive Officer, Fedex Corporation; Joy Roach, Defendants.
    No. 11-2075.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 16, 2012.
    Decided: Feb. 21, 2012.
    Gerald Henneghan, Appellant Pro Se. Joleen Okun, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, PC, Washington, D.C.; Julia Bougie Judkins, Bancroft, McGavin, Horvath & Judkins, PC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Gerald Henneghan appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his amended employment discrimination complaint, denying his motions for reconsideration, and denying various nondispositive motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Henneghan v. Smith, No. 1:11-cv-00247LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. May 3, 2011; May 4, 2011; May 5, 2011; Sept. 1, 2011; Sept. 12, 2011; Sept. 19, 2011; Sept. 30, 2011; Oct. 3, 2011; Oct. 5, 2011). We deny Henneghan’s requests for counsel, recusal, and other relief on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.