Case ID: nj_71/html/0476-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM SAPP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued September 27, 1976
    Decided October 20, 1976.
    
      
      Mr. Philip Bib erg, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Stanley G. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).
    
      Mr. William F. Bolán, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of Hew Jersey, attorney; Ms. Barbara Ann Villano, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Morgan in her dissenting opinion. 144 N. J. Super. 455 at 460.

Three members of the Court would affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division.

For reversal—Chief Justice Hughes, Justices P ashman and Clifford and Judge Oonfoed—4.

For affirmance—Justices Mountain, Sullivan and Sghreiber—3.