Case ID: misc_35/html/0828-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Morris Brodsky, Respondent, v. The Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Appellant.
    Appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, fifth district, borough of Manhattan.
    H. A. Robinson (G. Glenn Worden, of counsel), for appellant.
    I. Cohen, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Although the evidence might well lead to a different conclusion from that reached by the learned justice in the court below, it was, nevertheless, conflicting, and there is not a preponderance in defendant’s favor sufficiently strong to warrant this court in disturbing the verdict.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.