Case ID: nj_224/html/0448-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

134 A.3d 27
    ALEXANDER BARDIS AND MONICA BARDIS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. KITTY STINSON AND STINSON CLAIMS SERVICES, DEFENDANTS, AND CUMBERLAND INSURANCE GROUP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued January 19, 2016
    Decided April 27, 2016.
    
      Marc L. Doubling argued the cause for appellant (Methfessel & Werbel, attorneys; Mr. Dembling and Jacqueline C. Cuozzo, on the briefs).
    
      Constantine Bardis argued the cause for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is reversed, and the Law Division’s judgment is reinstated, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Sapp-Peterson’s dissenting opinion, reported at 444 N.J.Super. 227, 240, 132 A.3d 930 (App.Div.2014) (Sapp-Peterson, P.J.A.D., dissenting).

For Reversal — Chief Justice RABNER and Justices LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, SOLOMON and Judge CUFF (temporarily assigned) — 6.

Not Participating — Justice FERNANDEZ-VINA.