Case ID: sw3d_138/html/0809-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Larry HATCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 62882.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    July 20, 2004.
    Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
    Deborah Daniels, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before SPINDEN, P.J., HOLLIGER and HARDWICK, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry Hatch appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. He asserts his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to impeach the testimony of the State’s primary witness. Upon review of the record, we find no error in the motion court’s determination that trial counsel exercised reasonable trial strategy. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would have no jurisprudential value.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).