Case ID: nj-eq_88/html/0601-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William S. Ketcham, Jr., complainant-respondent, v. George W. Ketcham, administrator, &c., defendant-appellant.
    [Decided January 31st, 1918.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in 8k N. J. Eq. 577.
    
    
      Mr. William S. Ketcham, Jr., pro se, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. Frank E. Bradner, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Emery.

For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Trenchakd, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner — 12.

For reversal — None.