Case ID: f-appx_394/html/0085-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SPIRA FOOTWEAR, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. Steven LEBOW; Bryon Lebow; Ungaretti & Harris, Limited, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 10-50027
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Sept. 1, 2010.
    Edmund Link Beck, Esq., Beck & Hall, P.C., El Paso, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Robert Keith Whitt, Esq., Midland, TX, Wiley F. James, III, James & Haugland, P.C., El Paso, TX, for Defendants-Appel-lees.
    Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Our careful review of the record on appeal in this civil matter reflects increasingly severe sanctions for repeated and continuing contumacious conduct by Plaintiff-Appellant Spira Footwear, Inc., culminating in the district court’s dismissal of Spi-ra’s case after repeated and increasingly severe lesser sanctions had failed to accomplish their intended purposes. Our review also satisfies us that all rulings and orders appealed from, including dismissal, represent fully justifiable exercises of the judicial process by the district court for the reasons patiently explained by that court in its several orders.

Accordingly, for essentially the reasons given by the district court, its rulings, orders, and judgment are, in all respects

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.