Case ID: so2d_73/html/0676-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

H. L. MOORMAN, Appellant v. A. Edward HARNICK, doing business as Edward’s Art Galleries, Appellee.
    Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc.
    July 9, 1954.
    Rehearing Denied July 30, 1954.
    George B. Carter, Orlando, Murray W. Overstreet and Ellis F. Davis, Kissimmee, for appellant
    Thacker & Thacker, Kissimmee, and Richard W. Hobbs, Hot Springs, Ark., for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The conflict in the evidence and the inferences deducible therefrom in this case were such as to require that the question of liability be submitted to a jury, and it was therefore error to direct a verdict in plaintiff’s favor.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from should be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, HOBSON, and DREW, JJ., concur.

SEBRING and MATHEWS, JJ., dissent