Case ID: f-appx_469/html/0275-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Samuel BURT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wanda Carter HALE, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 11-7454.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 15, 2012.
    Decided: March 19, 2012.
    Samuel Burt, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Daniel C. Plyler, Davidson & Lindemann, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; Kristy Markay Grafton, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Burt appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burt v. Hale, No. 3:09-cv-03343-SB, 2011 WL 4479539 (D.S.C. Sept. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.