Case ID: pa_170/html/0296-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Williams,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Commonwealth, Appellant, v. George E. Paul.
    
      Constitutional law — Interstate commerce — Original package — Oleomargarine.
    
    Argued Jan. 18, 1895.
    Appeal, No. 105, July T., 1894, by plaintiff, from judgment of Q. S. Phila. Co., Oct. T., 1893, No. 370, on-special verdict.
    Before Sterrett, C. J., Green, Williams, McGollum, Mitchell, Dean and Fell, JJ.
    Reversed.
    
      See the two next preceding cases.
    
      Carroll B. Williams and John G. Johnson, A. Morton Cooper and George S. Graham, district attorney, with them, for appellant.
    
      Henry B. Edmunds, Bichard C. Bale with him, for appellee.
    October 11, 1895:
   Opinion by

Mr. Justice Williams,

The questions raised in this case are identical with those just disposed of in Commonwealth v. J. Otis Paul, 170 Pa. 284, in which an opinion is this day filed.

For reasons there stated the judgment is reversed and judgment entered in favor of the commonwealth on the special verdict.

The record is remitted for purposes of sentence and execution.