Case ID: sw3d_359/html/0541-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Brandy MABERY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 96604.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Feb. 21, 2012.
    Brocea Smith, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Jennifer A. Wideman, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before: CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Brandy Mabery appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(h), (k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Mo. R. Civ. P. (2011). 
      
      . All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P. (2011), unless otherwise indicated.