Case ID: conn-app_21/html/0821-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stanley V. Tucker v. Pace Investments Associates et al.
    (8504)
    Borden, O’Connell and Foti, Js.
    Argued April 10
    decision released April 19, 1990
    
      Stanley V. Tucker, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).
    
      PaulD. Buhl, with whom were I. Milton Widem and, on the brief, Charles F. Corcoran III and Robert E. Pace, for the appellees (named defendant et al.).
   Per Curiam.

This case must be dismissed because of a lack of a final judgment for purposes of appeal. See Practice Book § 4002 (d) and (e).

The appeal is dismissed.