Case ID: misc_135/html/0482-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Rodenbeck, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Empire State Pickling Co., Inc., and Others, Plaintiffs, v. Walter J. Bennett and Others, Defendants.
    Supreme Court, Ontario County,
    December 31, 1929.
    
      Abbott, Rippey & Hutchens, for the plaintiffs.
    
      Earle S. Warner, for the defendants.
   Rodenbeck, J.

The proposed defendants are not necessary parties. All the bondholders are represented by the trustee. (Jackson v. Tallmadge, 246 N. Y. 133; Vetterlein v. Barnes, 124 U. S. 169; Phœnix Nat. Bk. v. Cleveland Co., 11 N. Y. Supp. 873; Rogers v. Rogers, 3 Paige, 379.) The 31st clause of the complaint is authorized. (Real Prop. Law, § 501, added by Laws of 1920, chap. 930, as amd. by Laws of 1925, chap. 565.) If an adverse claim is set up, an application for a bill of particulars may be applied for. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 247.)

Motions denied, with ten dollars costs to‘abide event.

So ordered.