Case ID: f-appx_469/html/0268-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Wister KING, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles J. STRAUSS, Judge; R. Bryan Haskins, Attorney for the Commonwealth, Esq., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 11-7483.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 15, 2012.
    Decided: March 19, 2012.
    Wister King, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
    Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wister King, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny King’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. King v. Strauss, No. 1:11-cv-01041-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 17, 2011; entered Oct. 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.