Case ID: f-appx_235/html/0628-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo OLMOS-HUERTA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-50366.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 13, 2007 .
    Filed Aug. 22, 2007.
    Michael J. Crowley, Esq., USSD — Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    
      Alfredo Olmos-Huerta, San Diego, CA, pro se.
    Elizabeth A. Missakian, Esq., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Alfredo Olmos-Huerta appeals his conviction following a guilty plea to bringing in illegal aliens without presentation and aggravated identity theft. He contends that the district court erred in denying his motion for substitute counsel. OlmosHuerta’s motion preceded his unconditional guilty plea, which constituted a waiver of the right to appeal all non-jurisdictional antecedent rulings. See United States v. Castillo, No. 05-30401, 496 F.3d. 947, 954, 2007 WL 2120232 (9th Cir. July 25, 2007) (en banc); United States v. Lopez-Armenta, 400 F.3d 1173, 1175 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 891, 126 S.Ct. 199, 163 L.Ed.2d 204 (2005). We therefore dismiss the appeal.

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.