Case ID: nev_88/html/0588-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

VIRLEE OSBORNE, Appellant, v. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT. OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
    No. 6837
    November 16, 1972
    502 P.2d 986
    [Rehearing denied March 6, 1973]
    
      B. Mahlon Brown, III, of Las Vegas, for Appellant.
    
      Peter I. Breen, of Reno, for Respondent.
   OPINION

Per Curiam:

Appellant’s sole contention on appeal is that the record does not support a decision of the Board of Review, Employment Security Department, the effect of which was to deny him unemployment benefits in the sum of $599. In our view, said decision is supported by substantial evidence, which warranted a determination that twice within a two week period, in order to obtain unreduced benefits, appellant falsely stated he had been totally unemployed.

Affirmed.