Case ID: minor_1/html/0382-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Judge Crenshaw\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rea against Lewis.
    DECEMBER, 1824.
    Declaration for maliciously and wrongfully suing* out attachment ■does not aver the termination of the suit by attach* ment; omission cured by verdict.
    IN the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Lewis declared against Rea, for having maliciously and wrongfully sued out an original attachment against him. General issue, and verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. "The defendant here assigned as Error—That it is not alleged in the declai’ation that the suit instituted by attachment was at an end before the commencement of this action.
    
      Acre, for plaintiff in Error,
    cited 2 Gould’s Esp. 120. I Doug. 215. lEsp. R. 80.
    
      Rust for defendant in Error.
   Judge Crenshaw

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The objection to the declaration would have been fatal on special demurrer, but now it comes too late. It is fair to presume that to the satisfaction, of the Jury all the facts necessary to warrant their verdict were -proved. Hence we are to infer, that on the trial it was proved that the suit instituted by the attachment was at an end when this action was brought.

Let the judgment be affirmed,