Case ID: so2d_653/html/1149-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. GLICKSTEIN, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David HASKELL, Appellant, v. Deanna ROLLINS, Appellee.
    Nos. 94-0884, 94-1131.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 10, 1995.
    Michelle S. Kohn of Nicoletti, Block, Duffy, Poney & Kohn, P.A., Wellington, for appellant.
    Thomas E. Kingcade of Thomas E. Kingeade, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appel-lee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

DELL, C.J., and FARMER, J., concur.

GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with opinion.

GLICKSTEIN, Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur with the majority on the merits of the action, but disagree on the award of attorneys’ fees by the trial court. As to that, I would reverse and remand with direction to apportion appellant’s responsibility for same in accordance with the interest he received. See § 64.081, Fla.Stat. (1993); Diaz v. Security Union Title Ins. Co., 639 So.2d 1004, 1006 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 649 So.2d 232 (Fla.1994) (holding that cotenants of property each possessing a one-half interest in property are each hable for one-half of the attorneys’ fees awarded); Daugharty v. Daugharty, 441 So.2d 1160 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), rev. denied, 450 So.2d 486 (Fla.1984).