Case ID: ohio-st-3d_83/html/1459-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

98-1733.
    State ex rel. Licking Cty. v. Licking Mem. Hosp.
    In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. On October 5,1998, respondent filed a motion for leave to file a reply to relators’ memorandum contra respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. Whereas S.CtPrae.R. XI(4) prohibits a reply to a memorandum opposing a motion,
    IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to file a reply to relators’ memorandum contra respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings be, and hereby is, denied.