Case ID: sw3d_14/html/0625-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re the Marriage of Norma Faye MONTENEGRO, Respondent, v. George E. MONTENEGRO, Appellant.
    No. 73962.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    June 8, 1999.
    Thomas E. Osterholt, Jr., Francis X. Neuner, Jr., Dankenbring, Greiman, Os-terholt & Hoffman, P.C., St. Louis, for appellant.
    Karen S. Little, O’Fallon, for respondent.
    Before HOFF, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, and MARY RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, George E. Montenegro (“husband”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, dissolving his marriage to respondent, Norma Faye Montenegro. Husband contends the court lacked personal jurisdiction over him. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript and find the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).