Case ID: sw3d_99/html/0493-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Louis JONES, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 81008.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    March 11, 2003.
    Scott Thompson, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Charnette D. Douglass, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., and MARY K. HOFF, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Louis Jones (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence imposed after a jury trial finding him guilty of first degree burglary in violation of Section 569.160 RSMo 2000.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).