Case ID: so2d_247/html/0290-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Edward B. JOHNSON, Jr., Respondent.
    No. 40563.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    April 22, 1971.
    Patrick A. Podsaid, Coral Gables, and Arnold Nevins, Miami Beach, for The Florida Bar, complainant.
    
      Harold Peter Barkas, Miami, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The referee on February 18, 1971, filed his report recommending certain disciplinary actions against the respondent, Edward B. Johnson, Jr., a member of The Florida Bar.

The accused lawyer has not sought review as permitted by Rule 11.09(3) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, 32 F.S.A. The recommendation of the referee is, therefore, approved and accordingly respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded and directed to show, instanter, to the satisfaction of the Bar that he has instituted an accounting system which will permit complete control of monies entrusted to him. Respondent is further ordered to pay the costs of these proceedings in the amount of $640.50.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, A. C. J., and CARLTON, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.