Case ID: so2d_677/html/1002-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "FARMER, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael J. CURTIN and Erica Curtin, Appellants, v. The HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP, a Foreign Corporation, Appellee.
    No. 95-0923.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Aug. 14, 1996.
    
      Keith M. Krasnove of The Krasnove Law Firm, P.A., Coral Springs, for appellants.
    Judith W. Simmons and Mark M. Scha-baeker of Frank, Schabacker, Gramling, Simmons & Dunlap, Tampa, for appellee.
   FARMER, Judge.

We reverse the summary judgment in this case upon a conclusion that a deposition on file demonstrated triable issues of fact. Moreover, the record establishes that the opponent of the motion had not completed discovery, especially a deposition of an employee of the moving party which had been rescheduled at the request of the movant for a day after the hearing on the motion. In this latter regard, we find this case indistinguishable from our recent decision in Lubarsky v. Sweden House Properties of Boca Raton Inc., 673 So.2d 975 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

REVERSED.

KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.