Case ID: okla_129/html/0218-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CARTER v. FOWLER.
    No. 18612.
    Opinion Filed Feb. 14, 1928.
    (Syllabus.)
    Appeal and Error — Reversal—Failure of Defendant in Error io File Brief.
    Where defendant in error fails to file brief, and the assignments of error are reasonably supported by the authorities cited by plaintiff in error, the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded in accordance with the prayer of the petition in error.
    Error from District Court, Stephens County; M. W. Pugh, Judge.
    Action between G. W. Carter and W. M. Fowler. From the judgment in favor of the latter, the former brings error.
    Reversed.
    Sandlin & Winans, for plaintiff in error.
    Anderson & Hickman, for defendant in error.
   PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error has served and filed brief as required by the rules of this court. Defendant in error has failed to file brief or offer any excuse for not so doing, although the time therefor has long since expired.

We have examined the brief of plaintiff in error, and its assignments of error are reasonably supported by the authorities cited therein. This court is not required to and will not search the record to find a reason why the judgment appealed from should be sustained. The petition in error filed in this court prays that the judgment of the trial court be reversed, set aside, and held for naught and that plaintiff in error be restored to all rights lost by reason of the rendition of this judgment. Under the holdings of this court, the judgment should be reversed and the cause remanded for new trial. Home State Bank v. Oklahoma State Bank, 51 Okla. 368, 151 Pac. 1044.

It is so ordered.

Note.—See 3 C. J. p. 1441, §1604 1/2 (Anno).