Case ID: or-app_121/html/0101-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted May 3,
    reversed and remanded for reconsideration June 9, 1993
    In the Matter of the Compensation of Carl A. Cox, Claimant. ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS, Petitioner, v. Carl A. COX, Respondent.
    
    (WCB 91-07564; CA A75023)
    853 P2d 323
    Adam T. Stamper, Medford, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Cowling & Heysell, Medford.
    Edward J. Harri and Malagon, Moore, Johnson, Jensen & Correll, waived appearance for respondent.
    Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Landau, Judges.
   PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. SAIF v. Herron, 114 Or App 64, 836 P2d 131, rev den 315 Or 271 (1992).