Case ID: nj-eq_93/html/0224-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alfred R. Tooker et al., complainants, v. Rose Maple et al., defendants.
    [Decided October 14th, 1921.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court, of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes., and reported in!9B N. J. Eg. 3J+0.
    
    Appeal of Walter J. Vreeland et al.
    
      Messrs. Collins & Corbin, for the complainants.
    
      Messrs. Coult & Woodruff, Mr. Carl Saenger and Mr. William A. Lord, for the defendants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbact-i, I-Ieppent-ieimer, Gardner — 8.

For reversal — Tiie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Kalisci-i, Williams, Van Buskirk — 5.