Case ID: kan_82/html/0859-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Susie A. Starr, Appellant, v. A. W. Maupin et al., Appellees.
    
    No. 16,523.
    Appeal from Shawnee district court; Alston W. Dana, judge.
    Opinion filed May 7, 1910.
    Affirmed.
    
      J. S. Ensminger, and J. R. McNary, for the appellant.
    
      D. H. Branaman, for the appellees.
   Per Curiam:

Giving to the evidence the strongest interpretation of which it is susceptible in the plaintiff’s favor, it is legally insufficent to establish want of legal capacity. This being true the action was barred by the statute of limitations. Likewise the charges of fraud and undue influence were not proved. Part of the rejected evidence was improper and the remainder was sufficiently covered by other questions and answers.

The judgment is affirmed.