Case ID: sw2d_941/html/0561-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Edwin FRANK and Ester Frank, Defendants/Appellants.
    No. 69926.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Jan. 21, 1997.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 17, 1997.
    Application to Transfer Denied April 29, 1997.
    John G. Yound & Evan D. Buxner, St. Louis, for Defendants/Appellants.
    John A. Ross & Patricia Redington, Clayton, for Plaintiff/Respondent.
    Before AHRENS, C.J., CRANDALL, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendants appeal from the judgment entered on a jury verdict assessing damages in this condemnation action.

The evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).