Case ID: f-appx_265/html/0449-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Edward ADAMIC, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-10558.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted Jan. 14, 2008 .
    Filed Jan. 22, 2008.
    Thomas E. Flynn, Esq., USSAC-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Alister McAlister, Esq., Wilton, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: HALL, O’SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      
         The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

James Edward Adamic appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his conditions of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Adamic contends that the special condition of probation that prevents him from possessing or using a computer with any “on-line computer service” was not contemplated in his plea agreement and that the condition is excessive and unreasonable. Because this court previously concluded that Adamic’s challenge to his conditions of supervised release was foreclosed by his valid appeal waiver, Adamic’s contention is precluded under the law of the case doctrine. See United States v. Scrivner, 189 F.3d 825, 827-28 (9th Cir.1999).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.