Case ID: so2d_817/html/0946-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sheila DISANTO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Division of Retirement, Appellee.
    No. 3D01-2161.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 22, 2002.
    Jay M. Levy, Miami, for appellant.
    Larry D. Scott, Tallahassee, for appel-lee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Because there was competent, substantial evidence to support the Commission’s findings of fact, we affirm. Botner v. State, Dep’t of Admin. Div. of Ret., 438 So.2d 94, 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Division of Ret. v. Allen, 395 So.2d 1192, 1192 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Kennedy v. Wiggins, 368 So.2d 454, 455-56 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).