Case ID: ohio-st_117/html/0620-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rudner v. The State of Ohio.
    
      Supreme Court—Dismissals—No debatable constitutional question involved.
    
    (No. 20815
    Decided December 28, 1927.)
    Error to the Court of Appeals of Stark county.
    
      Messrs. Ammerman S Mills, and Mr. George Gordon Battle, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Mr. Henry W. Harter, prosecuting attorney, Mr. C. B. McGlintock, Mr. James M. Aungst, and Mr. Clifton Grabill, for defendant in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Day, Allen, Kinkade, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.