Case ID: sw3d_113/html/0684-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hossein ROKHIFAR, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 82313.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Sept. 2, 2003.
    Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    
      Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John Munson Morris, III, Linda Lemke, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR. and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Hossein Rokhifar, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. He contends he involuntarily pleaded guilty because his plea counsel assured him he would receive a sentence totaling ten years’ imprisonment.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).