Case ID: so2d_508/html/0500-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Fernando RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. KLAISLER MANUFACTURING CORP., Appellee.
    No. 86-3062.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 9, 1987.
    Haggard & Kirkland, Coral Gables, James C. Blecke, Miami, for appellant.
    Pyszka, Kessler, Massey, Weldon, Catri, Holton & Douberley and Malcolm W. Weldon, Cooper, Wolfe & Bolotin and Sharon L. Wolfe and Maureen E. Lefebvre, Miami, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The summary judgment from which this appeal is taken is affirmed on the authority of Shaw v. General Motors Corp., 503 So.2d 362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), and we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the same questions which we certified in Shaw. We find no merit in appellant’s argument that there is a genuine issue of material fact as to the date upon which the allegedly defective product was manufactured and sold.

Affirmed.