Case ID: la-ann_25/html/0227-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Ludeling, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 4624.
    The State ex rel. Nelson & Poppleton v. Judge of the Sixth District Court, Parish of Orleans.
    Where the defendant, after pleading to the merits, made a reconventkmal demai.ti, and the judge refused to fix the cause for trial unless the defendcmt should give security ior costs;
    Held — That there is no known law or practioe which could justify his conduct, and that-none had been referred to by said judge.
    APPLICATION for a Mandamus on Saucier, Judge of the Sixth District Court, parish of Orleans.
    
      George L. Bright, lor relator.
    Justices concurring : Ludeliug, Howell and Morgan.
   Ludeling, C. J.

The suit of the New Orleans and Bay Island Company v. Nelson & Poppleton is pending in the Sixth District Court. The defendant, after pleading to the merits, made a reconventional demand.

The Judge of the Sixth District Court refuses to fix this cause for trial unless the defendcmt shall give security for costs.

We know of no law or practice which would justify his conduct— nor lias he referred us to any.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judge a quo cause the clerk of his court to reinstate the said suit on the jury docket, and that the said case be called and fixed for trial according to law.