Case ID: a2d_580/html/1331-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John T. PEAY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.
    No. 88-678.
    District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
    Oct. 25, 1990.
    John M. Copacino, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
    John R. Fisher, Asst. U.S. Atty., for ap-pellee.
    Before ROGERS, C.J., and NEWMAN *, FERREN *, BELSON, TERRY, STEADMAN, SCHWELB, FARRELL , and WAGNER, Associate Judges, and PRYOR ’, Senior Judge.
    
      
       Associate Judge Farrell has recused himself from this case.
    
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

On consideration of appellee’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the response thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division* that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of May 23, 1990, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en bane on Tuesday, December 11, 1990, at 9:30 a.m. Counsel should be present in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals courtroom, located on the sixth floor, no later than 9:25 a.m. on that day. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before November 5, 1990.