Case ID: ad3d_153/html/1428-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Carlos M. Diggs, Respondent.
    [60 NYS3d 697]
   Appeal by the People, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the County Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), dated October 15, 2015, as, after a hearing, granted that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, and that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence is denied.

A police officer who saw the defendant commit two suspected violations was justified in pursuing the defendant once he fled from the officer (see People v Morris, 138 AD3d 1239, 1240 [2016]; People v Basono, 122 AD3d 553, 553 [2014]; People v Coba, 78 AD3d 857, 858 [2010]; People v Canty, 55 AD3d 330, 330-331 [2008]; People v Simms, 25 AD3d 425 [2006]; People v Delgado, 4 AD3d 310, 310-311 [2004]). Since the pursuit of the defendant was justified, a handgun found where the defendant fell to the ground was not subject to suppression as the product of unlawful police conduct. The County Court therefore erred in granting that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Rivera, J.R, Lev-enthal, Hall and Duffy, JJ., concur.