Case ID: okla-crim_25/html/0422-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RED McGOVERN v. STATE.
    No. A-4395.
    Opinion Filed Dec. 22, 1923.
    (221 Pac. 1118.)
    Appeal from County Court, Oklahoma County; W. R. Taylor, Judge.
    Red McGovern was convicted of unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquor, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    O. P. Estes, for plaintiff in error.
    The Attorney General, for the State.
   PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Red McGovern, was convicted in the county court of' Oklahoma county of the offense of unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquor, and punishment fixed at imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days and to pay a fine of $50. Judgment was rendered on the 6th day of March, 1922. A proper extension of time having been allowed, the appeal was lodged in this court on the 3d day of July, 1922. The cause was finally submitted on the 8th day of November, 19231 No brief has been filed in behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearance was made to orally argue the cause at the time it was submitted. Rule 9 of this court provides: “When no counsel appears, and no briefs are filed, the court will examine the pleadings, the instructions of the court and the exceptions taken thereto, and the judgment and sentence, and if no prejudicial error appears, will affirm the judgment.”

After an examination of the pleadings, the instructions of the court, and the judgment and sentence, the court finds that no prejudicial error occurred sufficient to authorize a reversal of this judgment, and the same is therefore of-firmed.