Case ID: f-appx_86/html/0670-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re: Marvin R. ANDERSON, Petitioner.
    No. 03-7579.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 28, 2004.
    Decided Feb. 12, 2004.
    Marvin R. Anderson, Petitioner pro se.
    Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM.

Marvin R. Anderson petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court recently denied his motion. See United States v. Anderson, No. CR-99-239 (S.D.W.Va. Dec. 2, 2003). Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Anderson’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED