Case ID: so2d_558/html/0156-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Orrin T. HUNT, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAMINERS, Appellee.
    No. 89-3098.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    March 14, 1990.
    Stephen Marc Slepin, Tallahassee, for appellant.
    Lisa Nelson, for appellee.
   ORDER ON MOTION FOR STAY

PER CURIAM.

Appellant files a motion to stay the final order of the Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Psychological Examiners (Board), pending this appeal. We deny the motion for stay.

The final order of the Board, among other things, placed appellant’s license on probation for two years with specific restrictions. In support of his motion for stay pending appeal, appellant cites to Section 120.68(3), Florida Statutes, which states that “if the agency decision has the effect of suspending or revoking a license, super-sedeas shall be granted as a matter of right....” The final order of the Board neither suspended nor revoked the appellant’s license, accordingly, the automatic stay provision of Section 120.68(3), is not applicable. The motion for stay is denied.

ERVIN, WENTWORTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.