Case ID: sw2d_812/html/0539-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Lucy E. RUTLEDGE, Deceased. Michael D. BOBBITT, et al., Petitioners/Appellants, v. Pearl ALBRIGHT, Individually and as Personal Representative, and Earl Ray, Defendants/Respondents.
    Nos. 57802, 57834.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Feb. 5, 1991.
    Russell Anthony Willis, II, St. Louis, for appellants/cross-respondents.
    Harold G. Johnson, Mitchell Johnson, St. Ann, for respondents/cross-appellants.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners appeal from the trial court’s order in a discovery of assets action; defendant Earl Ray cross-appeals. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. As a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).