Case ID: ala_225/html/0160-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

142 So. 587
    UNITED WHOLESALE GROCERY CO. v. MINGE FLORAL CO.
    1 Div. 733.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    June 9, 1932.
    Gordon, Edington & Leigh, of Mobile, for petitioner.
    Lyons, Chamberlain & Courtney, of Mobile, opposed.
   PER CURIAM.

Petition of the Minge Floral Company for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court. in United Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Minge Floral Co., 142 So. 586.

The petition seeks to review the decision of the Court of Appeals on a finding of fact. The writ is denied on authority of Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, O. J., and THOMAS, BROWN, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.