Case ID: ala_233/html/0374-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BROWN, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

172 So. 124
    CITY OF BIRMINGHAM et al. v. ODUM, BOWERS & WHITE.
    6 Div. 42.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Jan. 14, 1937.
    W. J. Wynn, Clarence Mullins, Mullins, Deramus & Stuart, Thos. E. Skinner, and W. B. Harrison, all of Birmingham, for appellant.
    Wm. S. Pritchard and David R. Solomon, both of Birmingham, for appellee.
   BROWN, Justice.

The principles of law applicable to this, appeal are stated in City of Birmingham et al. v. Hood-McPherson Realty Company (Hood-McPherson. Furniture Company, Intervener) (Ala. Sup.) 172 So. 114, this day decided, arid necessitate an affirmance of the decree from which this appeal is prosecuted.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and KNIGHT, JJ., concur. 
      
       Ante, p. 352.