Case ID: njl_98/html/0555-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF NEWARK, APPELLANT.
    Submitted December 11, 1922
    Decided February 1, 1923.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 97 N. J. L. 52.
    For the respondent, Pitney, Hardin & 8'kinner.
    
    For the appellant, Jerome T. Congleton.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bergen in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chtbe Justice, Swayze, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.