Case ID: nw2d_921/html/0555-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel S. JAMES, Respondent, v. DULUTH CLINIC, Relator,
    BRAC, Administrator.
    A18-1498
    Supreme Court of Minnesota.
    January 8, 2019
    Eric W. Beyer, SiebenCarey, P.A., Duluth, Minnesota, for respondent.
    Edward Q. Cassidy, Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for relator.
    Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.
    ORDER
   Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 21, 2018, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton , 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that "[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $3,500 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ ______________________________

G. Barry Anderson

Associate Justice