Case ID: nj-misc_4/html/0514-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cubiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MARY J. WASSEL, RELATOR, v. HENRY J. GAUTCHEY, BUILDING INSPECTOR, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Submitted May term, 1926
    Decided May 18, 1926.
    Zoning—Case Within Rule in Ignaciunas.v. Risley.
    On rule for mandamus.
    
    Before Justices Pabkeb, Black and Campbell.
    Eor the relator, Viviano & Kehoe.
    
    Por the respondents, William W. Evans.
    
   Pee Cubiam.

This case is before the court on a rule to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue to the building inspector in a zoning case, an agreed state of facts is submitted to the court, in writing, duly signed by the respective attorneys and filed. Upon reading and answering the facts we. are satisfied the cases controlled by the case of State v. Nutley, 99 N. J. L. 389; affirmed, 98 Id., 712, as being directly in point. A rule may be entered, therefore, directing a peremptory writ of mandamus to issue to the building inspector of the borough of Hawthorne, Passaic county.