Case ID: f-supp-3d_222/html/1292-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Leo M. Gordon, Judge", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HANGZHOU YINGQING MATERIAL CO. and Hangzhou Qingqing Mechanical Co., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant.
    Court No. 14-00133
    Slip Op. 17-47
    United States Court of International Trade.
    April 21, 2017
   JUDGMENT

Leo M. Gordon, Judge

Before the court is the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (“Remand Results”), ECF No. 51, in this action. In the Remand Results, Commerce reconsidered its allocation of labor costs, determined that it would continue not to adjust the financial ratios, and provided further explanation for its departure from its decision to adjust the financial ratios based on similar labor expenses in Certain Steel Nails from the People’s Republic of China, 79 Fed. Reg. 19,316 (Dep’t Commerce Apr. 8, 2014) (final results 4th admin. rev.). Remand Results at 12. Commerce also reconsidered its valuation of brokerage and handling (“B & H”) costs, deducted the cost of obtaining a letter of credit from the total amount of B & H expenses, and revised the combination rate weighted-average dumping margin accordingly. Id. All parties agree that the Remand Results address the court’s concerns in Hangzhou Yingqing Material Co. v. United States, 40 CIT -, 195 F.Supp.3d 1299 (2016) (“Hangzhou I”) and that the Remand Results should be sustained. Def.’s Notice Regarding Comments to Remand Results, ECF No. 53.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the final results of the fourth administrative review (and aligned new shipper review) of the antidumping duty order covering steel wire garment hangers from the People’s Republic of China, Steel Wire Garment Hangers from the People’s Republic of China, 79 Fed. Reg. 31,298 (Dep’t Commerce June 2, 2014) (final results 4th admin, rev. and new shipper rev.), except for the matters covered by the Remand Results, are sustained; it is further

ORDERED that the Remand Results are sustained; and it is further

ORDERED that the subject entries enjoined in this action, see ECF No. 14 (order granting consent motion for preliminary injunction), must be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision, as provided for in Section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(e)(2012).