Case ID: f-appx_325/html/0254-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Christopher A. ODOM, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Jon OZMINT, Director; Mary Brown, Clerk; Kerrie Specht, Parole Officer; Ralph Hunter, Dho; Mr. Steven, Case Worker; Mrs. Laverette; Mr. Hallman, Defendants—Appellees, and South Carolina Department of Corrections, Insurance Policy Holder, Defendant.
    No. 08-8614.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 21, 2009.
    Decided: May 28, 2009.
    Christopher A. Odom, Appellant Pro Se. Erin Mary Farrell, John Eric Kaufmann, Donald Ray Settana, Jr., McKay, Cauthen, Settana & Stubley, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Christopher A. Odom appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Odom v. Ozmint, No. 3:07-cv-00343-PMD (D.S.C. Oct. 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.