Case ID: ga_115/html/0203-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Eish, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jones v. The State.
    Argued March 17,
    Decided March 26, 1902.
    Conviction of manslaughter. Before Judge Falligant. Motion for new trial. Before Judge Barrow. Chatham superior court. January 17, 1902.
    
      Travis & Edwards, for plaintiff in error.
    
      W. W. Osborne, solicitor-general, contra.
   Eish, J.

There was no error in admitting or in rejecting testimony ; the instructions complained of were substantially correct; the charge, as a whole, was a full, fair, and impartial statement of the principles of law involved in the case ; most of the requests to charge were thereby adequately covered ; and the remaining requests were not of sufficient materiality to affect the result; it does not appear that any error was committed by expressing an opinion upon the evidence ; and the evidence warranted the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Little and Lewis, JJ., absent.