Case ID: njl_94/html/0567-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. KATE MORRIS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted March 22, 1920
    Decided June 14, 1920.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 94 H. J. L. 19.
    Eor the plaintiff in error, Frank M. McDermü.
    
    Eor the state, J. Henry Harrison, prosecutor of the pleas, and John A. Bernhard, assistant prosecutor.
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—Swayze, Trenchabd, Bergen, Kaltscit, White, Hepbeniieimeb, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackbrson, JJ. 10.

For reversal—Parees, J. 1.