Case ID: sw3d_10/html/0596-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David WICHERN, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Leesa STUCKEY, Cross-Petitioner/Respondent.
    No. ED 75775.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Jan. 25, 2000.
    Thomas J. Piatchek, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Gale L. Toko, St. Louis, for respondent Stuckey.
    Robert N. Hamilton, Kruse, Reinker & Hamilton, L.L.C., Clayton, for respondent guardian ad litem.
    Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his motion to modify the custody provisions of a paternity judgment and granting mother’s cross-motion to modify. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carrón, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

No jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).