Case ID: so2d_483/html/0504-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Solomon David ROBERTS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 86-3.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Feb. 18, 1986.
    Solomon David Roberts, in pro. per.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Susan O. Hu-gentugler, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and DANIEL PEARSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that appellant is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed. Smith v. State, 445 So.2d 323 (Fla.1983); Runyon v. State, 460 So.2d 494 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Whitchard v. State, 459 So.2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Rosemond v. State, 433 So.2d 635 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Snow v. State, 399 So.2d 466 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Beck v. Wainwright, 381 So.2d 1124 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

Affirmed.