Case ID: f2d_526/html/0430-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Louis VARGO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 75-1863.
    United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
    Dec. 10, 1975.
    Leonard Saltzer, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner-appellant.
    Scott P. Crampton, Atty. Gen., Gilbert Andrews, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tax Div., U. S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Elmer J. Kelsey, George G. Wolf, Meade Whitaker, Washington, D. C., for respondent-appellee.
    Before WEICK, CELEBREZZE and McCREE, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

This appeal was assigned by the Chief Judge to the panel for consideration pursuant to the provisions of Rule 3(e), Sixth Circuit.

Upon consideration of the briefs and record before the Tax Court we are of the opinion that the Tax Court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing appellant’s petition for want of prosecution.

It is therefore ordered that the decision of the Tax Court be and it is hereby affirmed. Rule 8, Sixth Circuit.