Case ID: njl_124/html/0133-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JAY M. ACKLEY, APPELLANT, v. JAMES NORCROSS ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Submitted October 27, 1939
    Decided January 25, 1940.
    For the appellant, William C. Gotshalk.
    
    For the respondents, Albert H. Woodruff.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.