Case ID: mass_7/html/0079-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      The Court,\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

* Hannah Jenne, Libellant, versus Abner Jenne.
    Where a libellant stated her original name to have been Launders, and in the copy published, to give notice to the other party, the name was written Saunders, the notice was held insufficient.
    This was a libel for a divorce a vinculo. Upon the suggestion of the libellant that the respondent was absent from the commonwealth, notice had been ordered by publishing an attested copy of the libel and order thereon in a public newspaper.
    The libellant stated her maiden name to have been Launders In the copy published the name was Saunders.
    
   The Court,

for this variance, refused to consider the notice as sufficient to authorize them to proceed; and the respondent having been defaulted, the default was taken off, a further notice ordered, and the cause continued.