Case ID: sw3d_524/html/0090-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lonnie SNELLING, Appellant, v. JESSE WOODFIN REMODELING, Jesse Woodfin, John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and Jane Doe, Defendants, and Kashflo, Inc., Respondent.
    No. ED 104699
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    Filed: March 28, 2017
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 16, 2017
    Lonnie Snelling, St, Louis, MO, pro se.
    Robert C. Withington, Clayton, MO, for Respondent.
    Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie Snelling (“Snelling”) appeals the circuit court’s dismissal of the underlying action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Snelling contends the circuit court abused its discretion in dismissing the case because (1) he was actively prosecuting the cause of action, and counsel for Defendant Kashflo, Inc. (“Kashflo”) had entered his appearance and filed a motion to dismiss, and (2) he was not given adequate notice .of the pending dismissal, which denied him of his due, process rights. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the circuit court did not clearly err. Ain extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).