Case ID: f-appx_319/html/0303-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel Robert QUEEN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-8240.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 17, 2009.
    Decided: March 23, 2009.
    Samuel Robert Queen, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appel-lee.
    Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Robert Queen, Jr., appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Queen, No. 1:93-cr-00369-AMD-1 (D. Md. filed Sept. 19 & entered Sept. 22, 2008; filed Oct. 1 & entered Oct. 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.