Case ID: f-appx_201/html/0934-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Robert BAREFOOT, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-7980.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 28, 2006.
    Decided: Oct. 4, 2006.
    Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lora M. Taylor, Office of The United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM.

Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., appeals the district court’s granting the Government’s motion for summary judgment and denying Barefoot’s motion to quash the Government’s civil complaint. The district court awarded the Government a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief and imposed on Barefoot a $20,000 civil fine in this case arising under 18 U.S.C. §§ 287, 1345(a) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Barefoot, No. 5:04-cv-888-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.