Case ID: so2d_128/html/0130-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Fred S. BALL, Petitioner, v. INLAND MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Huntington, West Virginia, Respondent.
    No. 30794.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    March 22, 1961.
    Headley & Sudduth, Miami, for petitioner.
    Gotthardt, Christie & Shepard, Miami, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflects apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the petition is without merit, therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON, ROBERTS and DREW, TJ., concur.