Case ID: f2d_145/html/0471-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LUDLOW MANUFACTURING & SALES CO., Appellant, v. DOLPHIN JUTE MILLS, Inc.
    No. 8474.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
    Argued March 9 and 10, 1944.
    Decided Dec. 1, 1944.
    Leslie B. Young, of New York City (Joseph G. Young, of Newark, N. J., and Pennie, Davis, Marvin & Edmonds, of New York City, on the brief), for appellant.
    William S. Pritchard, of New York City (John W. Steward, of Paterson, N. J., Harry H. Levin, of New York City, and John W. Steward, of Paterson, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.
    Before BIGGS, JONES, and Mc-LAUGHLIN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

After study of the briefs and the record in this case we see no occasion for further discussion of the valid reasons cogently and clearly set forth in the opinion of Judge Smith, 50 F.Supp. 395, for declaring the claims of the patent sub judice to be invalid. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.