Case ID: ga_148/html/0659-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Atkinson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sirmans et al. v. Rose.
    No. 914.
    January 15, 1919.
    Equitable petition. Before Judge Thomas. Lowndes superior court. March 16, 1918.
    
      W. D. Buie, Whitaker & Dukes, and Candler-, Thomson & Kirsch, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      E. K. Wilcox and Dan R. Bruce, contra.
   Atkinson, J.

The assignments of error on the rulings upon admissibility of evidence show no error. The portions of the charge excepted to stated correct principles of law, and were properly adjusted to the pleadings and evidence. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict for the plaintiff, and there was no error in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.