Case ID: nj-eq_103/html/0371-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mayer Hartman et al., appellants, v. Church Construction Company, respondent.
    [Decided October 15th, 1928.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.
    . Messrs. Koehler & Augenbliclc, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. David M. Litiuin, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Church, and reported in 101 N. J. Eq. 513.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Min-turn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Parker, Katzenbach, White, JJ. 3.