Case ID: f2d_131/html/0864-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PARCO, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. PERO & DANIELS, Inc., Defendant, Appellee.
    No. 3815.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit
    Dec. 18, 1942.
    Robert Cushman, of Boston, Mass. (Richard F. Walker and'Roberts, Cushman & Woodberry, all of Boston, Mass., of counsel), for appellants.
    Cedric W. Porter, of Boston, Mass. (George P. Dike, Dike, Calver & Porter, and James R. Hodder, all of Boston,'Mass., of counsel), for appellee.
    Before MAGRUDER, MAHONEY, and WOODBURY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

A careful examination of the record in this case convinces us that the patent in suit is invalid for want of invention for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court. 45 F.Supp. 685.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed with costs to the appellee.