Case ID: nys_134/html/1144-08.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROCHESTER HOTEL CORP., Respondent, v. FOSTER & GLIDDEN ENGINEERING CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    March 27, 1912.)
    Action by the Rochester Hotel Corporation against the Foster & Glidden Engineering Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Order, so far as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

SPRING and KRUSE, JJ., dissent, and vote for modification by limiting the amount of costs imposed to the trial fee and disbursements of the trial, besides costs of the motion.