Case ID: nys_147/html/1113-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. LAMBERT, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GALUSHA, Appellant, v. HUGHES et al., Respondents.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    April 4, 1914
    Action by Irving Galusha against Elizabeth K. Hughes and others.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide event. Held, that the bringing of the action and the other circumstances are sufficient to establish a repudiation by the plaintiff of the contract on the ground of fraud. Gould v. Cayuga County Nat. Bank, 86 N. Y. 75; Davis v. Rosensweig, 192 N. Y. 128, 84 N. E. 943, 20 L. R. A. (N. S.) 175, 127 Am. St. Rep. 890; Cox v. Stillman, 132 App. Div. 433, 116 N. Y. Supp. 931.

LAMBERT, J.,

dissents, upon the ground that there is a failure of proof to establish fraud as a basis of rescission.