Case ID: sw2d_891/html/0584-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Jerome KING, Defendant/Appellant. Jerome KING, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    Nos. 64399, 65842.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Jan. 31, 1995.
    Deborah B. Wafer, Dist. Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Kocot, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and CRAHAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury for rape, § 566.030.3, RSMoSupp.1990, and sodomy, § 566.060.3, RSMoSupp.1993. He was sentenced in accord with the jury’s assessment to concurrent twenty year prison terms. He also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. Movant has not addressed any points on appeal to the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion and that appeal is considered abandoned. An opinion would have no prec-edential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).