Case ID: f-appx_158/html/0497-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Precious OKEREKE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Charles A. MOYE, Jr., United States District Court for the District of Georgia, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 05-1922.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 22, 2005.
    Decided Dec. 28, 2005.
    Precious Okereke, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    
      Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Precious Okereke appeals the district court’s August 4, 2005 order denying her “Second Motion for Three-Judge Court,” construed as a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Okereke v. Moye, No. CA-05-526 (E.D.Va. Aug. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED