Case ID: ohio-st-3d_122/html/1225-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Disciplinary Counsel v. Pettigrew.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Pettigrew, 122 Ohio St.3d 1225, 2009-Ohio-3724.J
    (No. 2008-2082
    Submitted July 2, 2009
    Decided July 9, 2009.)
   {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Grady L. Pettigrew Jr., Attorney Registration No. 0029175, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of February 2, 2009, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F), suspended respondent for a period of six months, effective September 12, 2008, to run concurrently with the United States District Court suspension, and ordering that he will not be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio until he is reinstated before the United States Bankruptcy Court, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Pettigrew, 120 Ohio St.3d 1223, 2009-Ohio-706, 901 N.E.2d 230.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.