Case ID: ad2d_240/html/0575-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Pureza I. de Martinez, Respondent, v Home Indemnity Company, Appellant.
    [659 NYS2d 892]
   In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7510 to confirm an arbitration award dated July 28, 1993, Home Indemnity Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Yoswein, J.), dated May 16, 1995, which granted the petitioner’s motion to confirm the award and denied its cross motion to vacate the award.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, the cross motion is granted, and the proceeding is dismissed.

The appellant insurance carrier did not participate in an arbitration hearing because of its concern that its participation in the arbitration, even though unwilling, might serve as a waiver of its objection to the arbitrability of the claim (see, Matter of Beagle [MVAIC], 19 NY2d 834, 835; Matter of Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v Damaskinos, 227 AD2d 627; Matter of Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v Rothhart, 220 AD2d 509). Since the appellant did not participate in the hearing, it did not waive its right to appeal the denial of its application for a permanent stay of arbitration. Because the stay was improperly denied, the proceeding must be dismissed (see, Matter of Home Indem. Co. v de Martinez, 240 AD2d 580 [decided herewith]; see, e.g., Matter of Hehl v Government Empls. Ins. Co., 203 AD2d 572). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Thompson and Krausman, JJ., concur.