Case ID: so2d_741/html/0585-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Samuel SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 99-1965.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Aug. 27, 1999.
    Rehearing Denied Oct. 4, 1999.
    Samuel Smith, Mayo, pro se.
    No Appearance for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm this successive appeal from a denial of a motion to correct a sentence. Because appellant has engaged in frivolous and successive appeals we warn him that if he files another appeal regarding the same issue and conviction that he will be subject to a cancellation of good time credits and other sanctions. See Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Wareham v. State, 678 So.2d 432 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. den., 686 So.2d 583 (Fla.1996).

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.