Case ID: f-appx_466/html/0259-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kenneth William RAY, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joe DRIVER, Rec Officer; Harold Boyles; Michelle T. Fuseyamore, Regional Counsel, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 11-6164.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 8, 2012.
    Decided: Feb. 16, 2012.
    Kenneth William Ray, II, Appellant Pro Se. Alan McGonigal, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Kenneth William Ray, II, seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on November 17, 2010. The notice of appeal was deemed filed on January 31, 2011. Because Ray failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.