Case ID: or-app_229/html/0088-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

On respondent’s petition for reconsideration filed March 19,
    reconsideration allowed; former disposition withdrawn; former opinion (220 Or App 299,185 P3d 553 (2008)) modified and adhered to as modified; affirmed June 10, 2009
    STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DAMIEN JAY KARP, Defendant-Appellant.
    
    Washington County Circuit Court
    C050534CR; A130751
    209 P3d 858
    John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Erika L. Hadlock, Acting Solicitor General, and Paul L. Smith, Assistant Attorney-in-Charge, Criminal Appeals, for petition.
    Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

The state petitions this court to reconsider its decision in State v. Karp, 220 Or App 299, 185 P3d 553 (2008). In Karp, we affirmed defendant’s convictions but remanded for resentencing. The state now contends that, in light of Oregon v. Ice, 555 US_, 129 S Ct 711, 172 L Ed 2d 517 (2009), we erred in concluding that the imposition of consecutive sentences under ORS 137.123(5) requires findings by a jury rather than a judge. We agree and, accordingly, modify our opinion and affirm.

Reconsideration allowed; former disposition withdrawn; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified; affirmed.