Case ID: pa_387/html/0192-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sheriff, Appellant, v. Eisele.
    Argued. November 16, 1956.
    Before Stern, C. J., Jones, Bell, Chidsey and Musmanno, JJ.
    
      December 29, 1956:
    
      Herman L. Weary, with him F. Brewster Wickersham, and Weary, Hess & Humer, for appellant.
    
      George F. Douglas, Jr. and J. Boyd Landis, with them Fatter é Douglas and Landis & McIntosh, for appellees.
   Opinion

Per Curiam,

It will suffice to say that Ebersole v. Beistline, 368 Pa. 12, 82 A. 2d 11, and Gayne v. Carey Mfg. Co., 385 Pa. 618, 123 A. 2d 432, are recent analogous cases which further support the able opinion of the lower Court and rule this case in favor of the defendants.

The Order is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Shughart, which is reported in 7 D. & C. 2d 546.