Case ID: f-appx_75/html/0597-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ramon AVITIA-NUNEZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
    No. 02-71849.
    INS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 25, 2003.
    
    Decided Sept. 3, 2003.
    
      James M. Byrne, Esq., Elhaam Hashemi, Byrne, Bogue & Byrne, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.
    Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Papú Sandhu, Emily A. Rad-ford, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before GRABER, WARDLAW, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

This case raises the same issues as Padilla v. Ashcroft, 334 F.3d 921 (9th Cir.2003). For the reasons stated in that opinion, the petition is DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.