Case ID: ga_142/html/0543-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Atkinson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Central of Georgia Railway Company v. Ballard.
    October 1, 1914.
    Action for damages. Before Judge Rawlings. Washington superior court. June 2, 1913.
    
      Lawton & Cunningham, F. H. Sajfold', and J. J. Harris, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Rogers & Knox and Hines ■& Jordan, contra.
   Atkinson, J.

1. When the excerpts from the charge upon which error was assigned are considered in the light of the pleadings and evidence and the charge in its entirety, they furnish no ground requiring the grant of a new trial for any of the reasons assigned.

2. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no abuse of discretion in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

AU the Justices concur.