Case ID: ga_110/html/0285-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Cobb, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harrell v. Roberts.
    Argued November 9
    Decided December 6, 1899.
    Complaint. Before Judge Smith. Dodge superior court. September term, 1898.
    
      J. H. Martin, for plaintiff in error.
    
      DeLacy & Bishop, contra.
   Cobb, J.

The motion for a new trial presents no new or important question of law or fact; no error of law was committed by the court, and the evidence was sufficient to warrant the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.