Case ID: njl_47/html/0347-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

McDERMOTT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE MAYOR, &c., OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the ease of Elmendorf v. Jersey City, (ante p. 283.)

For affirmance — The Chief • Justice, Depue, Dixon, Magie, Parker, Reed, Scudder, Yan Syokel, Brown, Clement, Cole, Paterson, Whitaker. 13.

For reversal — None.