Case ID: ad2d_187/html/0563-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cathy Holtman, Respondent, v Harold Holtman, Appellant.
   In an action for divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Leis, J.), dated September 11, 1990, which awarded the plaintiff wife exclusive occupancy of the marital residence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the plaintiff exclusive occupancy of the marital residence (Kurppe v Kurppe, 147 AD2d 533, 534; Preston v Preston, 147 AD2d 464). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.