Case ID: f-appx_713/html/0997-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Robert ERSKINE, Defendant-Appellant
    No. 16-11665 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    (February 27, 2018)
    Steven E. Butler, Adara W. Overstreet, Kenyen Ray Brown, Maria E. Murphy, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Carlos Alfredo Williams, Federal Defender’s Office, Mobile, AL, for Defendant-Appellant
    Michael Robert Erskine, Pro Se
    Before WILSON, MARTIN and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Michael Erskine in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Erskine and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Erskine’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.