Case ID: ind_18/html/0296-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Engler v. Davis.
    An answer to the whole of a cause of action, which goes only to a part of it, is bad.
    APPEAL from the Shelby Common Pleas.
    
      T. A. McFarland, for the appellant.
    
      Davis, Wright $ Green, for the appellee.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages, because there is no error in the record. An answer to the whole of a cause of action, which goes only to a part of it, is bad. The judgment is affirmed accordingly, with costs.