Case ID: so2d_565/html/0917-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lavada Cecil WARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 89-862.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Aug. 30, 1990.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Although it appears that the victim’s out-of-court statements were erroneously admitted under section 90.803(23), Florida Statutes (1987), based on our review of the entire record, we conclude the error was harmless. State v. DiGiulio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986); Begley v. State, 483 So.2d 70 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).

AFFIRMED.

DANIEL, C.J., and COWART and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.