Case ID: cust-ct_1/html/0363-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dallinger, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 39138.
    Protests 591300-G, etc., of Saks & Co. et al. (New York).
   Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) Atomizers at 40 percent under paragraph 339, Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) followed; (2) brushes at 45 percent under paragraph 1407, Abstract 8950 followed; and (3) mirrors at 50 percent under paragraph 230.