Case ID: nj-eq_76/html/0615-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alexander M. Farrell, respondent, v. Albert Bork, appellant.
    [Argued November 24th, 1909.
    Decided February 28th, 1910.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning.
    
      Mr. Clarence L. Cole, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Ulysses C. Styron, for ,the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated by Vice-Chancellor Learning in deciding the case in the court below.

For affirmance—The Ci-iief-Justice, Swayze, Reed, Tbenciiard, Bergeh, Voobhees, Minturn, Bogeet, Veedenbuegii, Geay, Dill, Cougdou—12.

For reversal—Garrison, Pabiceb, Vroom—3.