Case ID: ga-app_43/html/0770-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

21591.
    Wilson v. The State.
    Decided September 4, 1931.
    
      C. G. Grodeett, W. W. Larsen Jr., for plaintiff in error.
    
      Fred Kea, solicitor-general, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

1. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court a ground of a motion for a new trial can not be considered by the reviewing court when the ground is not unqualifiedly approved by the trial judge. In the instant case special grounds 1 and 2 of the motion for a new trial are not so approved.

2. The remaining special ground of the motion for a new trial is expressly disapproved by the judge.

3. The verdict was amply authorized, if not demanded, by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.