Case ID: nys_94/html/1161-11.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROSENBERG, Appellant, v. COHEN-LEVISON CO., Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    June, 1905.)
    Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Ninth District. Action by Alexander F. Rosenberg against the Cohen-Levison Company. From a Municipal Court judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals.
    Reversed.
    J. S. Bernstein, for appellant
    O. Horwitz, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Defendant upon its brief states that the sole question involved in the appeal is as to the construction of the terms of the contract. An examination of these terms shows quite clearly that an accounting was contemplated to be had at the termination of the contract, when any account found due the plaintiff would be payable, and that during the time of the contract the plaintiff should be entitled to draw $20 a week against such an amount as would otherwise be due him at the termination of the contract. The judgment will be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.