Case ID: sw3d_14/html/0607-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Antijuian BOHLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 75085.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    May 4, 1999.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 3, 1999.
    Elaine A. Pudlowski, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Daniel W. Follett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before: MARY K. HOFF, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Antijuian Bohlen appeals the trial court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion for relief without an evidentiary hearing.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).