Case ID: so3d_113/html/1035-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HRGS, INC., Ron Van Der Kuijl, et al., Appellant, v. Vincent GOODWIN, Lovery Goodwin, et al., Appellee.
    No. 5D11-3651.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    May 31, 2013.
    A. Anthony Giovanoli, A. Anthony Giova-noli, P.A., Winter Park, and John W. Zie-linski, NeJame Law, NeJame, Lafay, Jan-cha, Ahmed, Barker, Joshi & Moreno, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.
    Edward P. Jordan II, of Edward P. Jordan II, P.A., Clermont, for Appellees, Edward P. Jordan II, Esq., and Edward P. Jordan, II, P.A.
    E. Dusty Aker, Aker Law Firm, P.A., Sarasota, for Appellees, Kenneth T. Lester, Sr., Kenneth T. Lester, Jr., and Rodolfo Olea.
    No appearance for Appellees, Vincent Goodwin and Lovery Goodwin.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of an award of attorney’s fees to Appellants as we find no abuse of the court’s discretion. See T &W Developers, Inc. v. Salmonsen, 31 So.3d 298, 301 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). However, we reverse the trial court’s order denying Appellants an award of costs. See Wolfe v. Culpepper Constructors, Inc., 104 So.3d 1132, 1137 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); Granoff v. Seidle, 915 So.2d 674, 677 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). On remand, the trial court shall award Appellants their reasonable, taxable costs.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

ORFINGER, C.J., GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.