Case ID: or-app_105/html/0408-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

On appellant’s petition for reconsideration filed December 19,
    reconsideration allowed; former decision (104 Or App 447, 800 P2d 1093) withdrawn; reversed and remanded January 23, 1991
    DAVID J. RUNNELS, Appellant, v. Carl ZENON, Respondent.
    
    (90-C-10083; CA A63682)
    803 P2d 785
    Noel Grefenson, Salem, for the petition.
    Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Petitioner has filed a petition for review. We treat it as a petition for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15(1), and allow it. We withdraw our earlier decision affirming without opinion, 104 Or App 447, 800 P2d 1093 (1990), and reverse and remand. Bird v. Maass (A64583), 104 Or App 271, 800 P2d 792 (1990).

Reconsideration allowed; former decision withdrawn; reversed and remanded.