Case ID: f-appx_559/html/0971-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Demetrices Tavares MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-13274
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    April 2, 2014.
    David Paul Rhodes, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, Peggy Morris Ronca, Daniel C. Irick, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Demetrices Tavares Mitchell, Miami, FL, pro se.
    Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Charles M. Greene, appointed counsel for Demetrices Mitchell in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Mitchell and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Mitchell’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.