Case ID: ga_75/html/0888-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Swint, administrator, vs. The Central Railroad et al.
    
    The presiding judge being dissatisfied with the verdict, and having granted a first new trial, one among many grounds of the motion being that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence, this court will not control his discretion in so doing; nor will it closely scan any views of the law expressed by the judge in granting the new trial, the presumption being that, on the second hearing, he will correct his own errors, if any.
    Judgment affirmed.
    January 26, 1886.
    Jackson, Chief Justice