Case ID: misc_30/html/0763-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MacLean, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Helen Wilson, Respondent, v. Margaret Hogan, Defendant, and Timothy Hogan, Appellant.
    Appeal by the defendant, Timothy Hogan, from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, .rendered in the Municipal Court, sixth district, borough of Manhattan.
    Edward G. Whitaker, for appellant.
    Ellis B. Southworth, for respondent.
   MacLean, J.

As it does not appear upon the record that the defendant resided within the jurisdiction of the court below, the judgment must be reversed, even if a collocation of the evidence may establish the home ” of the defendant to have been Eighty-sixth street,” in whatever locality that may be, for that does not sufficiently establish residence within the jurisdiction. Frees v. Ford, 6 N. Y. 176; Gilbert v. York, 111 id. 544.

Freedman, P. J., and Leventbitt, J., concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.