Case ID: misc_32/html/0737-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Julius Sondheim, Respondent, v. Katherina Schmidt, Appellant.
    Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan.
    A. Goldfarb, for appellant.
    Kurzman & Frankenheimer, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The ruling which sustained the objection to the question: “Did you in July, 1898, have any conversation with Mr. Sondheim as to cancelling the agreement with the defendants? ” was wrong and may have prejudiced the defendant.

The judgment is reversed and a new trial is granted, with costs to abide the event.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event.