Case ID: njl_99/html/0307-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. LAWRENCE RUGLIO, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued June 21, 1923
    Decided September 28, 1923.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 98 N. J. L. 13.
    Por the plaintiff in error, Wilbur A. Heisley.
    
    Por the defendant in error, John 0. Bigelow.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.

:: For affirmance — The Chancellor, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Van Bus-kirk, JJ. 8.

For reversal — Parker, Kalisch, JJ. 2.