Case ID: ny-super-ct_59/html/0590-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George T. Shambow, Respondent v. The New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company, Appellant.
    Decided July 2, 1891.
    Appeal from judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff upon the' verdict' of a jury, and from order denying defendant’s motion Upon the judge’s minutes for a new trial.
    Page & Taft, for appellant.
    Thomas P. Wickes, for respondent.
    Before Freedman, Dugro and Gildersleeve, JJ,
   The questions involved were as to defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s contributory negligence. The Court (Freedman, J., writing, Dugro and Gildersleeve, JJ., concurring) held, that under the evidence those questions were properly submitted to thé jury, and that the evidence supported the verdict and affirmed the judgment and order, with costs.