Case ID: or_303/html/0686-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted June 3,
    affirmed August 4,
    reconsideration denied October 20,1987
    CHARLES STANLEY KIMBALL, Petitioner on review, v. BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent on review.
    
    (CA A41562; SC S33873)
    740 P2d 779
    Lawrence E. Hall, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. On the petition for review was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.
    J. Scott McAlister, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Petitioner was convicted for sodomy and rape in the first degree and was sentenced to five- and nine-year terms of imprisonment, to run concurrently.

At petitioner’s prison term hearing, the Board of Parole (Board) established a history/risk score of 11, crime category 6 with a matrix range of 30 to 40 months and determined that a 36-month prison term was appropriate with a release date of March 2, 1989.

Petitioner appealed from the final order of the Board dated August 1,1986. The Court of Appeals affirmed from the bench.

Petitioner seeks review, claiming that the Board failed to consider mitigation in setting his prison term at 36 months. His claim for mitigation is that he is innocent, which is without merit.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.