Case ID: f-appx_708/html/0652-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nemiah MARBRA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 17-12911 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    (January 11, 2018)
    Yvette Rhodes, U.S. Attorney Service— Middle District of Florida, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Adam Joseph Nate, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tampa, FL, Rosemary Cakmis, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant
    Nemiah Marbra, Pro Se
    Before WILSON, JORDAN and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Stephen Langs, appointed counsel for Nemiah Marbra in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because, independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Marbra’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.