Case ID: nys_121/html/1147-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SCHULTZ, Respondent, v. BARBER ASPHALT PAVING CO., Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    March 4, 1910.)
    Action by Mike Schultz against the Barber Asphalt Paving Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Order of the County Court of Queens County reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion to dismiss complaint for failure to prosecute granted, with costs, on the authority of Regan v. Milliken Bros., 123 App. Div. 72, 107 N. Y. Supp. 722. See, also, 127 App. Div. 305, 111 N. Y. Supp. 281.

WOODWARD and THOMAS, JJ., dissent.