Case ID: sw2d_936/html/0178-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Marlon TOLLIVER, Defendant-Appellant. Marlon TOLLIVER, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.
    Nos. 67685, 69856.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Dec. 10, 1996.
    Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Marlon Tolliver (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of one count of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to a term of fifteen years’ imprisonment and from the denial without hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).