Case ID: us_241/html/0647-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nos. 365 and 367.
    United Railways Company of St. Louis, Plaintiff in Error, v. The City of St. Louis. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The City of St. Louis; United Railways Company of St. Louis, Plaintiffs in Error, v. The City of St. Louis; United Railways Company of St. Louis, Plaintiff in Error, v. The City of St. Louis; United Railways Company of St. Louis. Plaintiff in Error, v. The City of St. Louis; United Railways Company of St. Louis, Plaintiff in Error, v. The City of St. Louis, and St. Louis Transit Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The City of St. Louis.
    
      In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri.
    Argued April 4 and 5, 1916.
    Decided April 10, 1916.
   Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Holden Land Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541; Mellon Co. v. Mc Cafferty, 239 U. S. 134; (2) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14; (3) Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U. S. 61, 78; Chicago Dock Co. v. Fraley, 228 U. S. 680; Denver v. New York Trust Co., 229 U. S. 123, 143; St. Louis &c. Ry. Co. v. Arkansas ex rel. Norwood, 235 U. S. 350, 366.

No. 366.

No. 368.

No. 369.

No. 370.

No. 371.

No. 372.

In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction.

Mr. Henry S. Priest for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Truman P. Young and Mr. Charles H. Danes for the defendant in error.