Case ID: f-appx_407/html/0685-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kamal S. MUWWAKKIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON; Larry Huffman; John S. Garman; Linda B. Shear; Bryan S. Watson; A.P. Harvey; J. Combs; P. Scarberry; J. McQueen, Sergeant; M. McBride; T. Thompson; Brenda Ravizee; G. Robinson; M. Hensley, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 10-7373.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 16, 2010.
    Decided: Jan. 13, 2011.
    Kamal S. Muwwakkil, Appellant Pro Se. Banci Enga Tewolde, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Jim H. Guynn, Jr., Guynn, Memmer & Dillon, PC, Salem, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kamal S. Muwwakkil appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Muwwakkil v. Johnson, No. 7:09-cv-00318-gee-mfu, 2010 WL 3585983 (W.D.Va. Sept. 12, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.