Case ID: or_289/html/0743-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM. TANZER, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted June 3,
    affirmed October 21, 1980
    STATE OF OREGON, Appellant-Petitioner, v. LEO ALEXANDER, Respondent-Petitioner. STATE OF OREGON, Appellant-Petitioner, v. CLIFFORD ALEXANDER, Respondent-Petitioner. STATE OF OREGON, Appellant-Petitioner, v. MICHAEL A. BRISBOIS, Respondent-Petitioner.
    
    (NO. G-77-104, NO. G-78-43, NO. G-78-44, NO. G-78-45) (NO. G-77-103, NO. G-79-39, NO. G-78-40, NO. G-78-41) (NO. G-77-105, NO. G-78-46, NO. G-78-47, NO. G-78-48) (CA 13568, SC 26909)
    (Cases Consolidated)
    617 P2d 1376
    Robert C. Cannon, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for appellant-petitioner. With him on the briefs were James A. Redden, Attorney General, and Walter L. Barrie, Solicitor General, Salem.
    Edward J. Jones, Oregon City, argued the cause for respondent-petitioners. With him on the briefs was Parkinson, Fontana, Schumann and Jones, Oregon City.
    
      PER CURIAM.
   PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in its decision.

Affirmed.

TANZER, J.,

Specially Concurring.

In this case, the continuing validity of State v. Brown, 262 Or 442, 497 P2d 1191 (1972), is placed squarely in issue. I would reach the issue, and I concur based upon the reasons given in my concurring opinion in State v. Knowles, 289 Or 803, 618 P2d 1245 (1980).