Case ID: so2d_526/html/1050-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, Appellant, v. Ana MARINO, Appellee.
    No. 87-2512.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 21, 1988.
    Robert A. Ginsburg, Co. Atty., and Gary Siplin, Asst. Co. Atty., for appellant.
    Friedman and Friedman, Miami Beach, Daniels and Hicks and Patrice A. Talisman, Miami, for appellee.
    Before HUBBART, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Concluding that the trial court’s instruction to disregard the arguably inadmissible testimony sufficiently cured any prejudice that may have resulted from its admission, and that, therefore, a mistrial was not warranted, we affirm the judgment under review. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Guthrie, 321 So.2d 116 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Compania Dominicana de Aviacion v. Knapp, 251 So.2d 18 (Fla.3d DCA 1971).

Affirmed.