Case ID: so2d_297/html/0867-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William C. MacINNES, Appellant, v. CALADESI NATIONAL BANK OF DUNEDIN, a corporation, et al., Appellees.
    No. 73-358.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 21, 1974.
    Rehearing Denied Aug. 13, 1974.
    Robert R. Feagin, III, of Holland & Knight, Tampa, for appellant.
    Richard T. Earle, Jr., of Earle, Earle & Bryson, St. Petersburg, for appellees Cala-desi National Bank of Dunedin, Baird, Brincklow, MacArthur, O’Dea, Proefke, Prior, Schroder and Williams.
    John W. Hamilton, of Ware, Osborne, Hamilton & Woodruff, James R. Lyle, of Bradham, Lyle, Skipper & Cramer, St. Pe-tersburg, and John P. McKenna of Rowley & Scott, Washington, D. C., for appellee Rowley.
   PER CURIAM.

In this malicious prosecution action plaintiff/appellant appeals from an adverse judgment entered after a non-jury trial. We find no reversible error on dny of the points raised by appellant and must therefore affirm.

One point was raised herein by appellees on cross-appeal, however, and several of appellant’s points were restated by appellee Rowley. Our disposition hereof has rendered the one point raised on cross-appeal moot and Rowley’s restated points need not now be discussed. Additionally, certain facts adverse to appellee Rowley were found by the trial court but were not appealed from. Accordingly, we do not reach any consideration thereof.

Affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and HOBSON and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.