Case ID: ad_280/html/0940-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James A. Andrews, Respondent, v. Samuel Lebis et al., Defendants, and Brooklyn Trust Company, Individually, Appellant.
   Defendant Brooklyn Trust Company, individually, appeals from so much of an order as denied its motion under subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the third cause of action of a second amended supplemental complaint, which cause of action alleged that the appellant conspired with respondent’s customer to prevent him and did prevent him from earning a commission for the sale of real property. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Holán, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.