Case ID: f-appx_470/html/0206-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Howard Dean BAILEY, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 11-1963.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 15, 2012.
    Decided: March 22, 2012.
    Jeanné T. Anderson, Nosuk Pak Kim, Cowardin & Kim, PLC, Newport News, Virginia, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, John S. Hogan, Senior Litigation Counsel, David H. Wet-more, United States Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Howard Dean Bailey, a native and citizen of Jamaica, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motions to reconsider and reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Bailey’s motions. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2011). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Bailey (B.I.A. Aug. 9, 2011). We grant the Attorney General’s motion to strike pages 169-230 of the joint appendix, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.