Case ID: sw2d_980/html/0159-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James MALONEY, Appellant, v. MARITZ, INC., Respondent.
    No. 74208.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Nov. 10, 1998.
    Robert A. Bedell, Edward A. Gilkerson, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Lee B. Schaefer, Luke & Cunliff, P.C., St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., and CRAHAN and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Maloney appeals the award denying his claim for compensation against his former employer, Maritz, Inc. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the award is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).