Case ID: sw3d_530/html/0613-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Noah SMITH, Appellant, v. RECONDITIONED APPLIANCES, Respondent.
    ED 105433
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    Filed: October 17, 2017
    Noah Smith, 3431 Pestalozzi Street, St. Louis, MO 63118, pro se.
    Reconditioned Appliances, c/o Bill Johnson, 701 N. Belt W, Swansea, IL 62226, pro se.
    Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

After a bench trial, Noah Smith appeals the judgment in his favor awarding $500 in damages against Reconditioned Appliances. Appellant contests the trial court erred by: (I) improperly applying the wrong measure of damages; (II) failing to award consequential and incidental damages; (III) failing to find Respondent liable for the damage allegedly caused by Respondent; and (IV) failing to submit his cause to a jury. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).