Case ID: f-appx_617/html/0711-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Humberto GOSTELOS-FUENTES, a.k.a. Roberto Flores-Millan, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Humberto Gostelos-Fuentes, a.k.a. Beto, a.k.a. Roberto Flores-Millan, Defendant-Appellant.
    Nos. 14-10332, 14-10333.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 17, 2015.
    
    Filed June 19, 2015.
    James Eric Keller, Assistant U.S., Elizabeth Olson White, Esquire, Assistant U.S., USRE-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Reno, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Robert W. Story, Story Law Group, Reno, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Humberto Gostelos-Fuentes appeals from the district court’s judgments and challenges his guilty-plea convictions and concurrent 135-month sentences for unlawful reentry by a deported, removed, or excluded alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(B)(viii) and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Gostelo-Fuentes’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Gos-telo-Fuentes the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Gostelo-Fuentes has waived his right to appeal his convictions and his 135-month sentences. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waivers, we dismiss the appeals. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.2009).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel is GRANTED.

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.