Case ID: njl_92/html/0636-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

McELIGOT & CHENOWETH COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE TOWN OF NUTLEY, IN THE COUNTY OF ESSEX, RESPONDENT.
    Argued November 29, 1918
    Decided March 3, 1919.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court,, whose opinion is reported in 92 N. J. L. 120.
    For the appellants, Reed & Reynolds.
    
    For the respondent, J. Harry Hull.
    
   Per Curiam.

] The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief .Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 8.

For reversal — Minturn, White, JJ. 2.