Case ID: ala-app_20/html/0692-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SAMEORD, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(104 So. 924)
    Henry PEEBLES v. STATE.
    (8 Div. 313.)
    (Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    April 7, 1925.
    Rehearing Denied April 21, 1925.)
    Appeal from Circuit Court, Morgan County; James E. Horton, Jr., Judge. Distilling. Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Ex parte Peebles, 104 So. 917.
    G. O. Chenault, of Albany, for appellant. Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.
   SAMEORD, J.

It could serve no good purpose to recite the evidence as shown by the record. After an examination of the entire evidénee, we are of the opinion that the defendant was not entitled to the general affirmative charge. The rulings of the court upon the admission of testimony were also without error. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.