Case ID: njl_70/html/0828-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BRIDGET O’REILLY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted March 22, 1904
    Decided September 30, 1904.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiff in error, Alan E. Strong and Charles E. Gummere.
    
    For the defendant in error, James L. ICelly and Clarence S. Biddle.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment in this cause is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Dixon in the Supreme Court, reported in 40 Vroom 119.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Garrison, Fort, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Yredenburgi-i, Green, Gray. 9.

For reversal — None.