Case ID: f-appx_281/html/0152-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anthony Eugene BROOKS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA; Newport News Police Department; Kevin Christopher Hartian, Agent/Policer; United States Attorney; Scott W. Putney, Assistant U.S. Attorney; Department of Justice; Bureau of Prisons, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 08-6143.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 29, 2008.
    Decided: June 5, 2008.
    Anthony Eugene Brooks, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Anthony Eugene Brooks appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brooks v. City of Newport News, No. 2:07-cv-00574-HCM-JEB (E.D.Va. Dec. 18, 2007). We deny Brooks’ motions for appointment of counsel and to provide service. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.