Case ID: so3d_105/html/0550-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Octavius WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 5D12-2748.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Nov. 16, 2012.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 28, 2013.
    Octavius Walker, Arcadia, pro se.
    No Appearance for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying Walker’s rule 3.800(a) motion without prejudice to Walker filing a rule 3.800(a) motion that affirmatively demonstrates on the face of the record his entitlement to additional credit. See Woody v. State, 993 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.