Case ID: so2d_606/html/1286-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO., Appellant, v. RAYPO CONSTRUCTION, INC., and Raymond T. Poccia, Sr., Appellees.
    No. 91-3083.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Nov. 12, 1992.
    Robert K. Tucker and Leonel R. Benitez, Zack, Hanzman, Ponce & Tucker, P.A., Miami, for appellant.
    Raymond T. Poccia, Sr., appellee, pro se.
   PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. We agree with appellant that the guaranty provision of the retail installment contract was not ambiguous and that the trial court erred in permitting parol evidence to vary the terms of the guaranty. See Manufacturers’ Leasing, Ltd. v. Florida Dev. & Attractions, Inc., 330 So.2d 171 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.