Case ID: f-appx_508/html/0202-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eleazar TEODORO-BASILIO, a/k/a J. Eleazar Teodoro-Basilio, a/k/a Chelelo, a/k/a Huichol, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 12-7587.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 22, 2013.
    Decided: Jan. 25, 2013.
    Eleazar Teodoro-Basilio, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Westmoreland Rose, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eleazar Teodoro-Basilio appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Teodoro-Basilio’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       The district court stated that Amendment 750 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines was inapplicable because Teodoro-Basilio's offense did not involve crack cocaine. Teodo-ro-Basilio was convicted of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute marijuana, cocaine, and cocaine base. However, for sentencing purposes, the court held him accountable for only marijuana and cocaine powder. Therefore, Amendment 750 did not apply to Teodoro-Basilio's case.