Case ID: ohio-st_22/html/0371-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      By the Court.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George McKenzie et al. v. Wm. Ruth, Mayor, etc.
    Application for mandamus, Muskingum county.
    
      Evans $ Beard and John W. King, for complainants,
    cited Code of Civil Procedure, sec. 693, ¡3. & C. 1155; Criminal Code, see. 156, 66 Ohio Laws 310; Municipal Code, secs. 179,180,125, 56, 66 Ohio Laws; Justices’ Code, as amended, sec. 93, 66 Ohio Laws, 7.
   By the Court.

Held: In a proceeding In mandamus, the alternative writ must contain a statement of all the facts necessary to justify the order sought for by the. proceeding, and, on the hearing, omissions in the alternative writ can not be supplied by the affidavit, or application, on which it was allowed.

Peremptory writ refused.

Bloeksom § Andrews, for respondent.

No brief on file.