Case ID: sw2d_797/html/0793-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Emmett PENDERGRAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 42905.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Sept. 4, 1990.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 2, 1990.
    Application to Transfer Denied Nov. 20, 1990.
    David S. Durbin, Appellate Defender, Terri L. Backhus, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Stewart M. Freilich, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and KENNEDY and ULRICH, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

From denial of a Rule 27.26 (repealed) motion, the movant raises two points: 1) his motion for new trial should have been sustained because of newly discovered evidence, and 2) counsel failed to advise him of the right to a change of judge.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).