Case ID: so2d_333/html/0062-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George ROLLINS and Margaret Rollins, Appellants, v. Eugene C. THOMAS et al., Appellees.
    No. Z-134.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 14, 1976.
    Robert W. Morrison, Tampa, for appellants.
    L. William Graham of Dell, Graham, Willcox, Barker, Rappenecker, Ryals & Henderson, James E. Clayton, Gainesville, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

We now visit this case for a second time. (See Thomas v. Rollins, Fla.App. 1st 1974, 298 So.2d 186) Since our prior opinion, a trial has been held on the merits following which the trial court entered a final judgment imposing a constructive trust in favor of appellees. From that final judgment this appeal is taken. An examination of the record reveals conflicting evidence. It was the province of the trial judge to resolve that conflict. If appellees’ version of the evidence is accepted as true the requisites for a constructive trust were established. We find no error.

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, C. J., and McCORD and MILLS, J J., concur.