Case ID: sw2d_941/html/0709-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John PRAPOTNIK, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. 70365.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Feb. 25, 1997.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 31, 1997.
    Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for movant/appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Fernando Bermudez, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondenVre-spondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).