Case ID: nj-eq_94/html/0799-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Otto Lowy, respondent, v. William V. McMenimen, defendant, and Lowy Laboratory, incorporated, a corporation, appellant.
    [Decided May 10th, 1923.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Baches, whose opinion is reported in 94 N. J. Eq. 75.
    
    For the appellant, Gae-de & Gaede.
    
    For the respondent, Frank F. Bradner.
    
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baches.

For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenciiard, Black, Katzenbaci-i, White, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Van Buskirk—9.

For reversal—Parker, Bergen, Kalisch—3.