Case ID: del_2/html/0445-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROBINSON & PONDER vs. HOLLAND.
    After issue joined, the court will not permit the defendant to withdraw his pleadings for the purpose of demurring specially.
    
    Capias case. .Narr. Pleas. Issue.
    This case was continued on the plaintiff’s application, on account of the absence of material witnesses; and, after the continuance, Frame for defendant, moved for leave to withdraw his pleadings and demur.
    
      Robinson and fVootten, for plaintiffs.
    
      Frame and Ridgely, for defendant.
   The court granted him the leave, restricting him to a general demurrer, on the same principle with the case of Waples vs. M‘Gee & Salmons, (ante 444.)