Case ID: so2d_589/html/1035-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Perry Allen SHEPPARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 90-03351.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Dec. 6, 1991.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Jennifer Y. Fogle, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s convictions for possession of methamphetamine and cannabis.

We do not agree with defendant’s contention that reversal is required by reason of a Richardson violation which occurred through the failure of the state to produce photographs which might tend to exculpate defendant.

The record does not establish that such photographs were in existence and available to the state. See Demps v. State, 395 So.2d 501 (Fla.1981).

Affirmed.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and LEHAN, JJ., concur. 
      
      . Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971).