Case ID: sw3d_576/html/0337-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Adonnis SMITH, Appellant.
    No. ED 106499
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    Filed: June 11, 2019
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
    ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Eric Schmitt, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.
    Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Adonnis Smith appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. There was no error in the admission of the child eyewitness's out of court statements and no error in failing to sua sponte intervene in the prosecutor's closing argument. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).