Case ID: ohio-st-3d_71/html/0437-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Simon.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Simon (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 437.]
    (No. 94-1814
    Submitted October 11, 1994
    Decided December 30, 1994.)
    
      
      Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Harold, F. Craig III, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
    
      Frederick J. Simon, pro se.
    
   Per Curiam.

On review, we agree with the board’s finding of facts, conclusions of law, and recommendation. Accordingly, we publicly reprimand respondent and tax costs to him.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Pfeifer, J., dissenting. I would dismiss the case.