Case ID: ny-st-rep_51/html/0929-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Court of Appeals.
    Filed February 28, 1893.
    Alfred Roe et al., Ex’rs, Resp’ts, v. Caroline A. Strong et al., App’lts.
    
      John J. Macklin, for resp’ts; A. A. Spear, for app’lts.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of previous opinion of this court, 119 N. Y., 316; 29 St. Rep., 504, and upon the opinion rendered below at special term; the difficulty suggested with respect to the boundaries in the Brewster-Seaton deed is to be satisfactorily resolved, upon careful consideration, in the way suggested by Judge Bartlett. All concur.