Case ID: njl_59/html/0586-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JAMES P. BRUCE AND WILLIAM BRUCE, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM H. PEARSALL, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    On error to the Supreme Court.* For opinion of the Supreme Court, see ante p. 62.
    For the plaintiffs in error, Applegate & Degnan.
    
    For the defendant in error, Edmund Wilson.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Depue, Dixon,, Gummere, Lippincott, Van Syckel, Barkalow, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Krueger, Nixon. 12.

For reversal—None.