Case ID: sw_135/html/0564-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HARPER, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FISHER v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    March 8, 1911.)
    Criminal Law (§ 1144) — Appeal—Review— Presumptions.
    In the absence of a statement of facts on appeal, the presumption is that the court charged the law applicable to the facts produced in evidence.
    [Ed. Note. — Eor other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 3016-3037; Dec. Dig. § 1144.]
    Appeal from District Court, Hunt County; R. L. Porter, Judge.
    Johnnie Eisher was convicted of passing a forged instrument, and appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    
      
      For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Kep’r Indexes
    
   HARPER, J.

Appellant was tried and convicted at the October term of the district court of Hunt county, being charged with passing a forged instrument.

There is neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception in the record. The indictment charges the defendant with passing a forged instrument. The charge submits this offense to the jury. In the absence of a statement of facts, the presumption is that the court charged the law applicable to the facts introduced in evidence.

The judgment is affirmed.