Case ID: ad2d_226/html/1052-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frederick Webber et al., Respondents-Appellants, v City of Dunkirk, Appellant-Respondent.
    (Appeal No. 2.)
    [642 NYS2d 852]
   Order affirmed without costs. Same Memorandum as in Webber v City of Dunkirk (226 AD2d 1050 [decided herewith]).

All concur except Lawton and Balio, JJ., who dissent in part and vote to modify in the same dissenting Memorandum as in Webber v City of Dunkirk (226 AD2d 1050, 1051 [decided herewith]). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Gerace, J.—Labor Law.) Present—Denman, P. J., Law-ton, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.