Case ID: so2d_653/html/0509-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Betty RUCH, Appellant, v. IDEAL CLEANERS & LAUNDRY and Aetna Life & Casualty Company, Appellees.
    No. 94-395.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    April 25, 1995.
    Thomas A. Vaughan, Orlando, and Bill McCabe of Shepherd, McCabe & Cooley, Longwood, for appellant.
    Daniel DeCiccio and Roland P. Tan of DeCieeio & Associates, P.A., Orlando, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

The judge of compensation claims’s order denying Betty Ruch’s claim for permanent total disability benefits is affirmed. This af-firmance, however, does not preclude Mrs. Rueh from applying for and receiving rehabilitation and retraining under section 440.49, Florida Statutes (Supp.1990), if such retraining is found to be appropriate by the judge of compensation claims.

AFFIRMED.

ZEHMER, C.J., BARFIELD, J., and SHIVERS, Senior Judge, concur.