Case ID: misc_34/html/0802-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The Railway Advertising Co., Respondent, v. Atmore L. Baggot, Appellant.
    Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, ninth district, borough of Manhattan, made on the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant.
    Milton Mayer, for appellant.
    Einstein & Townsend, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The sole question here is as to the extent of an agent’s authority. The evidence was conflicting. It was submitted to the jury in a fair and careful charge and we see no reason to interfere with their verdict.

Present: Bisohoff, P. J., Leventbitt and Clabke, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.