Case ID: ny-2d_91/html/0999-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[698 NE2d 952, 676 NYS2d 123]
    The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Brewer, Appellant.
    Argued April 1, 1998;
    decided May 14, 1998
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Frank J. Loss, New York City, Rosali Vazquez and Daniel L. Greenberg for appellant.
    
      Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel of New York City (Elizabeth S. Natrella and Leonard Koerner of counsel), for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant argues that he did not receive a prompt probation revocation hearing (see, CPL 410.70 [1]) and that the trial court unreasonably delayed his sentencing (see, CPL 380.30 [1]). We disagree. Trial courts have considerable discretion in administering litigation and in managing their dockets. Given this discretion, the time between the filing of the declaration of delinquency and the final hearing was not unreasonable as a matter of law. Similarly, the shorter period between the final hearing and the sentencing was not unreasonable as a matter of law.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.