Case ID: nys_147/html/1134-10.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PEOPLE ex rel. ROACHE, Respondent, v. HANBURY, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    April 10, 1914.)
    Proceeding by the People of the State of New York, on the relation of J. Benedict Roache, against Harry A. Hanbury.
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment debtor Flynn’s relation to the check drawn by the Hamilton Trust Company, which appellant indorsed, and to the other persons referred to in the supplementary proceedings, involves a wide field of testimony. An. examination of those parts of this testimony designated by the Special Term as to be included in the appeal record shows no sufficient grounds to change the order below. This court cannot act on the mere assertion that they are not material, without having any detailed grounds of that objection stated. The order of February 21st is therefore affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. See, also, 147 N. Y. Supp. 1134.