Case ID: njl_99/html/0528-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LACLARE L. WELSH, APPELLANT, v. CLYDE POTTS ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Argued December 7, 1923
    Decided April 11, 1924.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 98 N. J. L. 630, sub nom. Welsh v. Morristown.
    
    For the appellant, Congleton, Stallman & Hoover.
    
    For the respondents, Nathaniel C. Toms and Conover English.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief Justice, Minturn, Kaijsctt, Black, Campbell, Gardner, Van Buskirk, JJ. 7.

For reversal — Katzenbaci-i, Clark, JJ. 2.