Case ID: sw3d_387/html/0402-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lester A. MINNER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 97793.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Dec. 11, 2012.
    
      Maleaner R. Harvey, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. P.J. and ROY L. RICHTER and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lester Minner (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to offer an instruction on the lesser-included offense of assault in the second degree.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).