Case ID: sw3d_18/html/0116-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Roger A. PEEK, Appellant.
    No. ED 76229.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    April 18, 2000.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 30, 2000.
    Roger A. Peek, Moscow Mills, pro se.
    Mark D. Bradley, Asst. Pros. Atty., Warrenton, for respondent.
    Before: RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Roger A. Peek (Defendant) appeals from the judgment entered pursuant to his conviction in a court-tried case for the offense of trespass in the second degree, in violation of § 569.150 RSMo 1994. Defendant was sentenced to pay a fine of $100.00 and was further required to pay court costs of $69.50. On appeal, Defendant raises the following claims of error: (1) he was charged pursuant to an unlawful procedure; (2) trespass in the second degree is not a prosecutable offense, in that it is statutorily classified as an infraction rather than a felony or misdemeanor; and (8) insufficiency of evidence. We have reviewed Defendant’s brief, the legal file and transcript. The claims of error are without merit, and a written opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). 
      
      . The State has not filed a brief in this matter.