Case ID: ohio-st-2d_46/html/0223-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Akron Bar Association v. Holt.
    [Cite as Akron Bar Assn. v. Holt (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 223.]
    (D. D. No. 76-6
    —Decided May 19,1976.)
    
      
      Mr. Joseph P. Wheeler, Mr. Frank P. Kaufmann and Mr. James P. Kelley, for relator.
    
      Freifield, Bruzsese, Wehr, Moreland & Go., Tj. P. A., and Mr. Carl C. Moreland, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The record fully supports the finding of fact made by the board of commissioners. Respondent has filed no objection thereto, and prays this court accept the recommendation of the board. We deem that recommendation appropriate upon these facts, and therefore suspend respondent from the practice of law for an indefinite period.

J udgment accordingly.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.