Case ID: sw2d_865/html/0794-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Jeffery CRAWFORD, Defendant/Appellant. Jeffery CRAWFORD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    Nos. 61068, 63360.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Oct. 12, 1993.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 10, 1993.
    Application to Transfer Denied Dec. 21, 1993.
    Henry B. Robertson, St. Louis, for defen-danVappellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.
    Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of two counts of unlawful use of a weapon, § 571.030.1(1), RSMo 1986, and one count of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.-020, RSMo Supp.1992. He also appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).