Case ID: f-appx_475/html/0251-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Angrej SINGH, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 10-73659.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 8, 2012.
    
    Filed Aug. 15, 2012.
    Daniela Ramona Razawi, Esquire, Law Office of Daniela R. Razawi, Lincoln, CA, for Petitioner.
    Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Kate Deboer Balaban, Esquire, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before: ALARCÓN, BERZON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Angrej Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his motion to reopen exclusion proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review as moot.

The BIA dismissed Singh’s appeal from the IJ’s order denying his June 23, 2009, motion to reopen on the ground that the motion should have been filed with the BIA in the first instance. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a). We dismiss as moot Singh’s petition challenging the procedural dismissal because, in a subsequent order, the BIA addressed the merits of the same claims.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     
      
      . Singh's petition for review of the later order was dismissed as untimely. See Singh v. Holder, No. 11-71269 (9th Cir. Mar. 12, 2012).