Case ID: f-appx_283/html/0180-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jesse Leon SPEARMAN, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 07-7521.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 17, 2008.
    Decided: July 9, 2008.
    Jesse Leon Spearman, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Everett James, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Jesse Leon Spearman appeals the district court’s order denying Spearman’s untitled motion seeking relief from his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, without prejudice to Spear-man’s ability to file a motion in the district court to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). United States v. Spearman, No. 3:05-cr-00057 (E.D.Va. Sept. 25, 2007); see also Kimbrough v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.