Case ID: wash_136/html/0695-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 18897.
    
      En Banc.
    
    November 7, 1925.]
    William Heaton, Sr., Respondent, v. William H. Smith et al., Appellants.
    
    Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Lindsley, J., entered February 25, 1924, in favor of the plaintiffs, notwithstanding the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendants, in a landlord’s action to recover possession of leased premises.
    Reversed.
    W. D. Scott and R. L. Campbell, for appellants.
    
      Randall & Danskin, for respondent.
    
      
       Reported in 240 Pac. 362.
    
   On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

— Upon a rehearing En Banc, a majority of the court adhere to the opinion heretofore filed herein, and reported in 134 Wash. 450, 235 Pac. 958. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to set aside the judgment already entered and pass upon the respondent’s motion for a new trial.