Case ID: ohio-st_113/html/0698-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

State, ex rel. Universal Realty Co., v. Brown, Secretary of State.
    
      Mandamus — Writ denied — Transaction concerning other parties and involving other interests.
    
    (No. 19037
    Decided June 16, 1925.)
    In Mandamus.
    
      Mr. William W. Bosensweig, for relator.
    
      Mr. G. G. Grabbe, attorney general; Mr. H. H. Griswold, and Mr. G. 8. Younger, for respondent.
   The court finds that the plaintiff is not entitled to a writ of mandamus as prayed for in the petition, for the reason that the transaction is one in which other persons are concerned and other interests involved, and the relief sought cannot be afforded by a writ of mandamus.

Writ denied.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.