Case ID: so2d_821/html/0480-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "JOHNSON, Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

TOTAL BENEFITS SERVICES, INC., et al. v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS.
    No. 2002-CC-1544.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    June 12, 2002.
   In re New Orleans City of; United Healthcare;—Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. F, Nos. 2001-10005; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2002-C-1063.

Stay denied. Writ denied.

JOHNSON, J., concurs and assigns reasons.

JOHNSON, Justice

concurring.

The issue in this case stems from the trial court’s denial of Total Benefits’ requests for a preliminary injunction, mandamus, and temporary restraining order. LSA-C.C.P. art. 3612 provides, in pertinent part:

B. An appeal may be taken as a matter of right from an order or judgment relating to a preliminary or final injunction, but such an order or judgment shall not be suspended during the pen-dency of an appeal unless the court in its discretion so orders.

(Emphasis added). Clearly, a suspensive appeal is not allowed under this provision unless the trial court so orders. In this case, the trial court allowed the suspensive appeal as a result of an erroneous instruction from the court of appeal. Thus, I believe that this matter should be converted to a devolutive appeal. Consequently, it would be unnecessary to post a bond.

However, since Total Benefits’ appeal is not limited to the denial of the preliminary injunction and the temporary restraining order, a reduction of the suspensive appeal bond is proper.