Case ID: sw3d_529/html/0925-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Peyton Kyle MCANELLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 104970
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE.
    Filed: October 3, 2017
    Gwenda R. Robinson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
    Joshua D. Hawley, Atty. Gen., Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
    Before James M. Dowd, C.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and Sherri B. Sullivan, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Peyton McAnelly appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prec-edential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2)&(5).