Case ID: ohio-law-abs_5/html/0251-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 283
    UNCAPHER v. CURL
    No. 20316.
    Supreme Court
    On mot. to cert.
    Dock. Feb. 9, 1927,
    5 Abs. 105.
    323. COUNTY COMMISSIONERS — Is there statutory liability in damages for taking of land for highway widening or is injunction the remedy?
    Attorneys — H. E. Hill, Marion, and T. B. Mateer, Mt. Gilead, for Uncapher; C. H. Conway, Mt. Gilead, for Curl.
   It is contended in the Supreme Court that there is no statutory liability upon county commissioners for damage to abutting owners, when same is taken for highway widening, but. that the only remedy lies in injunction.

Note — Motion to certify allowed, 5 Abs. 154.