Case ID: f-appx_684/html/0643-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

VOGUE INTERNATIONAL, LLC, DBA Vogue International, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 14-56394
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted August 2, 2016 Pasadena, California
    Filed March 21, 2017
    David A. Gauntlett, Attorney, James A. Lowe, Esquire, Gauntlett & Associates, Irvine, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant
    Linda Tai Hoshide, Esquire, Wilson El-ser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, Los Angeles, CA, David Simantob, Tres-sler LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee
    Before: REINHARDT, KOZINSKI, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
   MEMORANDUM

We remanded this appeal to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether there is federal jurisdiction. The district court concluded that there is no jurisdiction and dismissed the case. Because no timely appeal has been filed from that determination, this appeal is DISMISSED.

Appellee’s Motion to Take Judicial Notice, Dkt- #42, and Appellant’s Motion to Supplement the Record on Appeal, Dkt #45, are GRANTED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.