Case ID: nj-eq_100/html/0342-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Helen C. Douglass, respondent. v. Charles Cooper Spear et al., appellants.
    [Decided October 27th, 1926.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning, whose opinion is reported in 97 N. J. Eq. 25.
    
    
      Mr. Joseph Beck Taylor, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. David B. Bose, for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Heteield, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.