Case ID: cal-app_27/html/0793-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "THE COURT.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[Civ. No. 1555.
    First Appellate District
    April 21, 1915.]
    F. DEPAVO et al., Respondents, v. N. RIZZO et al., Appellants.
    Vendos and Vendee—Construction op Contract.—Judgment and order denying a motion for a new trial reversed on the authority of Depavo y. Bizgo, ante, p. 200.
    APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order refusing a new trial. Wm. H. Donahue, Judge.
    The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Depavo v. Rizzo, ante. p. 200.
    W. E. Rode, and Rose & Glidden, for Appellant Elizabeth Piepenberg.
    Stetson & Koford, for Appellant N. Rizzo.
    Aldrich & Gentry, for Respondents.
   THE COURT.

This is an appeal from the judgment by the defendant Elizabeth Piepenberg and from an order denying her motion for a new trial.

The facts are the same as in the case bearing the same name as the present, ante, p. 200, [149 Pac. 793], but numbered 1494, this day decided. Both appeals are from the same judgment, but taken by different defendants and by different methods. The points here urged in support of the appeal are there considered and decided, and the conclusion reached that the case should be reversed. For the reasons there given the judgment against this appellant should also be reversed, as also the order denying her motion for a new trial, and it is so ordered.