Case ID: sw_141/html/0966-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PRENDERGAST, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HICKMAN v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Dec. 20, 1911.)
    Ceiminal Law (§ 1097*) — Appeal—Record— Statement of Facts — Bill of Exceptions.
    Objection that a conviction is contrary to the law, and unsupported by the evidence, cannot be reviewed, in the absence of a. statement of facts.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Dec. Dig. § 1097.*]
    Appeal from Dallas County Court at Law; W. F. Whitehurst, Judge.
    Fred Hickman was convicted of carrying a pistol, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   PRENDERGAST, J.

The appellant was convicted for carrying a pistol, and his punishment assessed at 40 days in the county jail.

There is no statement of facts, nor bill of exceptions in the record.

The only complaint is that the verdict of the jury is contrary to the law and the evidence, and not supported by the evidence. Of course, this cannot be considered in the absence of a statement of facts.

The charge is in regular form. The charge of the court submits the case on a theory that clearly could have been proven under the charge.

The judgment will be affirmed.