Case ID: nj-eq_116/html/0539-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anton Balint and Elizabeth Balint, complainants-respondents, v. Fred Kalita and Mary Kalita, defendants-appellants.
    [Submitted May 25th, 1934
    Decided October 5th, 1934.]
    
      Mr. Samuel S. Gohen and Mr. G. George Goldman, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. Stephen F. Somogyi, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree under review is affirmed, by an equally divided court.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Bodine, Yan Buskirk, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 7.

For reversal — Parker, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heiier, Perskie, Kays, JJ. 7.