Case ID: so3d_209/html/0680-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ADVANCED EYECARE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, Appellant, v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D16-2295
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Opinion filed February 10, 2017
    Jason H. Clark, West Palm Beach, for Appellant.
    Katie E. Sabo, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Advanced Eyecare of Central Florida (“Employer”) appeals from a final order of the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, which affirmed a referee’s decision allowing a terminated employee to receive unemployment benefits. Having carefully considered Employer’s arguments on appeal and the record before us, we affirm. See, e.g., Parker v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 41 So.3d 1090, 1090 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (“An appeal referee’s factual determinations are ordinarily presumed to be correct. Thus, if there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the appeal referee’s findings, ... this court must affirm.” (citation omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.