Case ID: njl_70/html/0828-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. WALTER HARDCASTLE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. STILES & McCLAY, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.
    Argued March 17, 1904
    Decided September 30, 1904.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiffs in error, Eli E. Chandler.
    
    For the defendant in error, William Iff. Clevenger.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment in this cause is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Van Syekel in the Supreme Court, reported, in 40 Vroom 551.

For affirmance — Tiie Chancellor., Dixon, G-arrison, Fort, Pitney, Swayzb, Bogert, AHiedenbuegii, Vroom, Green, Gray. 11.

For reversal — None.