Case ID: nj-eq_60/html/0446-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James Fee, complainant and respondent, v. Mary A. Sharkey and Malachi Sharkey, her husband, defendants and appellants.
    [Filed March 5th, 1900.]
    On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Pitney, whose opinion is reported in 14 Dick. Ch. Rep. 284.
    
    
      Mr. Frank E. Bradner, for the appellants.
    • Mr. Newion B. Kilchell and Mr. Mahlon Pitney, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons assigned by Vice-Chancellor Pitney for advising it.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Gummere, Ludlow, Bogert, Hendrickson, Nixon, Adams, Vredenburgh — 8.

For reversal — Depue, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins — 5.