Case ID: f2d_625/html/0331-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CATALANO, INC., et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TARGET SALES, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    Nos. 77-2221, 77-2222.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted May 27, 1980.
    Decided Aug. 11, 1980.
    Jack B. Owens, Orrick, Herrington, Row-ley & Sutcliffe, San Francisco, Cal., argued, for plaintiffs-appellants; Richard J. Lucas, San Francisco, Cal., James P. Samarco, Fresno, Cal., on brief.
    G. Richard Doty, McCutchen, Black, Ver-leger & Shea, Los Angeles, Cal., argued, for defendants-appellees; J. Wallace Upton, Fresno, Cal., Pamela A. Rymer, Los Ange-les, Cal., Ted R. Frame, Coalinga, Cal., on brief.
    Before WALLACE and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
    
      
       Honorable M. Joseph Blumenfeld, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation.
    
   We remand this case to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with Catalano, Inc. v. Target Sales, Inc., et al., -U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 1925, 64 L.Ed.2d 580 (1980).