Case ID: mich_483/html/1130-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Grievance Administrator v Cote,
    No. 138313.
   Summary Disposition July 9, 2009:

The application for leave to appeal is denied, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is also considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we vacate the March 6, 2009, order of the Attorney Disciplinary Board and we remand this case to the Attorney Disciplinary Board for consideration as on reconsideration granted. The board should reconsider its vacation of conditions A through D of the hearing panel’s June 25, 2008, order of suspension in light of the documentation provided by the Grievance Administrator. In all other respects, the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant is denied, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court. ADB: 07-83-GA.