Case ID: sw3d_381/html/0376-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jewell SAUNDERS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 96474.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Oct. 2, 2012.
    Ruth B. Sanders, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J„ and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Jewell Saunders, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).