Case ID: nj-eq_69/html/0841-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Monmouth County Electric Company, respondent, v. Thomas P. McKenna, appellant.
    [Argued June 27th, 1905.
    Decided March 5th, 1906.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Pitney, whose opinion is reported in 68 N. J. Eq. 160.
    
    
      Messrs. Collins & Corbin, for the appellant. •
    
      Messrs. Grey, McDermott & Enright,-for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

' The decree appealed.from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in the court, of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Pitney.

For affirmance—Dixon, Fort, Garretson, Pitney, Bogert, Vroom, Green, Gray—8.

For reversal—The Chief-Justice, Swayze—2.