Case ID: so2d_809/html/0102-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. ERVIN, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David W. PRIDGEON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D00-2747.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    March 1, 2002.
    
      Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Phil Patterson, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD and LEWIS, JJ., concur; ERVIN, J., concurs with written opinion.

ERVIN, J.,

concurring.

The child’s identification of appellant during a medical examination was inadmissible under section 90.803(4), Florida Statutes (2000). See State v. Jones, 625 So.2d 821 (Fla.1993). The error was nevertheless harmless, because similar testimony was properly introduced via section 90.803(23).