Case ID: so2d_549/html/1140-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Miguel MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 88-286, 88-2334.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 10, 1989.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Jacqueline M. Valdespino, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and COPE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s revocations of probation and sentences thereon are hereby affirmed. See Russ v. State, 313 So.2d 758 (Fla.1975); Bernhardt v. State, 288 So.2d 490 (Fla. 1974); Godoy v. State, 541 So.2d 1366 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Butler v. State, 330 So.2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). However, the matter is returned to the trial court for a written order conforming to the oral pronouncements in open court. See Clark v. State, 510 So.2d 1202, 1204 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).