Case ID: f-appx_332/html/0837-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edgar SEARCY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia STANSBERRY, Warden, F.C.C. Petersburg, Virginia, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 09-6396.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 29, 2009.
    Decided: Oct. 5, 2009.
    Edgar Searcy, Appellant Pro Se. Robert P. McIntosh, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appel-lee.
    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edgar Searcy, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Searcy v. Stansberry, No. 3:08-cv-00050-REP, 2009 WL 424344 (E.D.Va. Feb. 19, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.