Case ID: sw2d_926/html/0950-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lewis A. ROGERS, Appellant. Lewis A. ROGERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    Nos. WD 49882, WD 51710.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Aug. 20, 1996.
    David Simpson, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for Appellant.
    Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Fernando Bermudez, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.
    Before ELLIS, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lewis Rogers appeals his conviction of possession of a controlled substance in a correctional facility, saying his motion to represent himself pro se should have been granted.

The judgments are affirmed, because 1) no issues pertaining to the denial of the Rule 29.15 motion are presented, and 2) the motion for pro se representation was not unequivocal and was not timely. Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).