Case ID: nys_92/html/1150-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WESTCOTT, Appellant, v. FIDELITY & DEPOSIT CO. OF MARYLAND, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    February 24, 1905.)
    Appeal from Trial Term, New York County. Action by Robert E. Westcott against the Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland. From a judgment granting insufficient relief," plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. E. H. Benn, for appellant. Albert B. Boardman, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

This case was before this court upon a former appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. 87 App. Div. 497, 84 N. Y. Supp. 731. Upon the new trial the same facts were presented, and the court below followed the decision of this court in directing a verdict for the plaintiff for the sum of $2,348.87, with interest. The plaintiff having, therefore, recovered a judgment for the damages that he has sustained by the breach of the contract to secure the performance of which this bond was given, he was not entitled to a further recovery. It follows that the judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.