Case ID: nj-eq_97/html/0547-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Coriam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nellie T. Kelleher, complainant-appellant, v. George H. Bragg, defendant-respondent.
    [Argued January 23d, 1925.
    Decided March 16th, 1925.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, whose opinion is reported in 96 N. J. Eq. 25.
    
    
      Messrs. Collins & Gorlin, Mr. Edward. A. Marlcley and Mr. David. A. Newton, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Charles M. Mason, for the respondent.
   Per Coriam.

The bill of complaint was filed in this case to compel the specific performance of a contract to sell real estate. The property is known as Nos. 2709, 2711, 2718 and 2718A Boulevard, Jersey City. Vice-Chancellor Lewis, before whom the case was heard, refused to advise a decree for specific performance, but did advise a decree dismissing the bill of complaint.

Our consideration of the case leads us to the same conclusion as that advised by the learned vice-chancellor.

The decree of the court of chancery is therefore affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.

For reversal—None.