Case ID: miss_246/html/0468-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      McGehee, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Fish Meal Company v. Brondum, et al.
    No. 42602
    March 4, 1963
    150 So. 2d 432
    
      
      Ebb J. Ford, Jr., Gulfport; Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, New Orleans, La., for appellant.
    
      Robert W. Oswald, Pascagoula, for appellee.
   McGehee, C. J.

(Hn 1) The issue in this case was fully covered and determined by us in the case of Fish Meal Co. v. Brondum, et al, 242 Miss. 573, 135 So. 2d 825, when on the interlocutory appeal' therein we held that the release of the primary endorser, whose endorsement was individual, unqualified and unlimited, resulted in the release of all of the endorsers who were secondarily liable. We affirmed and remanded the case in order that the chancellor might determine as an issue of fact whether or not the release of the principal endorser on the note, upon his payment of $44,000 thereon, was consented to by the remaining defendants. That issue has since been determined in the negative by the chancellor and we affirm his decree in that behalf.

Affirmed.

Arrington, McElroy, Rodgers, and Jones, JJ., concur.