Case ID: mo-app_165/html/0005-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "CAULFIELD, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

W. F. HENSON, Respondent, v. PASCOLA STAVE COMPANY, Appellant.
    St. Louis Court of Appeals,
    April 2, 1912.
    The opinion of the Springfield Court of Appeals in this case (151 Mo. App. 234) is adopted as the opinion of the court. •
    NORTONI, J., Dissents.
    Appeal from Pemiscot Circuit Court. — Hon. Henry C. Riley, Judge.
    Reversed and remanded.
    
      
      Faris & Oliver for appellant.
    
      Ward & Collins for respondent.
   CAULFIELD, J.

The case has been argued and submitted here and duly considered. Upon reading the record and considering the arguments, we are persuaded that the majority opinion of the Springfield Court, above referred to, properly disposes of the controversy, and it is adopted as the opinion of this court. For the reasons given in that opinion the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded. It is so ordered.

Reynolds, P. J., concurs. Nortoni, J., dissents, being’ of the opjinion that the plaintiff was not a fellow-servant with those engaged in loading cars in the forest.