Case ID: f-appx_708/html/0132-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frankie L. DOCTOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden MANSUKHANI, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 15-6020
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit,
    Submitted: October 27, 2017
    Decided: January 11, 2018
    Frankie Lane Doctor, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frankie Lane Doctor, Sr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Doctor v. Mansukhani, No. 0:14-cv-00425-JFA, 2014 WL 7670120 (D.S.C. Dec. 19, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED 
      
       We previously granted Doctor’s motion for authorization to file a successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in light of Johnson v. United States, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015). Doctor filed a motion in accordance with that authorization, and the motion is pending in the district court.