Case ID: f-appx_671/html/0763-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stacie E. LEIPOLD, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-15683 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Date Filed: 12/15/2016
    Michelle Lee Schieber, Danial Edward Bennett, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Macon, GA, Melvin E. Hyde, Jr., Michael J. Moore, U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Columbus, txA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Tim Saviello, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Columbus, GA, Christina Lee Hunt, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Macon, GA, Stacie E. Leipold, FCI Tallahassee— Inmate Legal Mail, Tallahassee, FL, for Defendant-Appellant
    Before ROSENBAUM, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Dodson, appointed counsel for Stacie E. Leipold in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Leipold’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.