Case ID: misc_170/html/0206-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Louis L. Tetelman and Another, Copartners, etc., Respondents, v. Robert C. Fulton and Another, as Trustees, etc., Appellants.
    
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    January 13, 1939.
    
      Montgomery, Peabody, Grace & Derby [Davies, Auerbach & Cornell and Kenneth W. Greenawalt of counsel], for the appellants.
    
      Harry C. Cohen, for the respondents.
    
      
       Revg. 168 Misc. 803.
    
   Per Curiam.

The agreement of January 30, 1932, in reference to the payment of legal services contemplated only the payment of legal services in connection with the future management of the property and did not inure to the benefit of the plaintiffs. Under the circumstances the trial court was in error in granting judgment in favor of the plaintiffs.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

All concur. Present — Hammer, Frankentbaler and Noonan, JJ.