Case ID: f_175/html/1021-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HENSON & FRANCESCONI CO. v. BROWN.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    March 8, 1910.)
    No. 1,933.
    In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Alabama.
    Gregory L. Smith, for plaintiff in error. T. M. Stevens and Joseph H. Lyons, for defendant in error.
    Before PARDEE, McCORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

In this suit, upon an account stated for work and labor done, merchandise, goods, and chattels sold, and for money paid at the instance of the defendant, the defense being that the suit is one to recover on gambling transactions, the questions argued in this court relate entirely to the rulings of the trial judge on the sufficiency of pleadings. On consideration, we find no prejudicial error in any of the rulings complained of, aDd the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.