Case ID: cal_162/html/0761-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "THE COURT.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[L. A. No. 3029.
    Department Two.
    March 2, 1912.]
    SARAH J. TEDFORD, Appellant, v. LESLIE F. GAY et al., Respondents.
    Judgment and order affirmed on the authority of Bedford v. Eichler, ante, p. 214, [121 Pac. 730].
    
      APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. W. R„ Hervey, Judge.
    The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Ted-ford v. Bidder, cunte, p. 214, [121 Pac. 730].
    G. L. Whitham, for Appellant.
    Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Hammack & Hammack, E. T. Sherer, and Joseph Smith, for Respondents.
   THE COURT.

The above entitled cause presents the same propositions considered in Tedford v. Eichler (L. A. No. 2772), ante, p. 214, [121 Pac. 730], and was submitted with the last mentioned case for decision. For the reasons there given the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

Hearing in Bank denied.