Case ID: ohio-st-3d_82/html/1418-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DISCIPLINARY DOCKET
    98-423.
    Columbus Bar Assn. v. King.
   On May 11, 1998, respondent filed a motion to strike relator’s answer brief filed pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(8). Whereas respondent’s motion is, in substance, a reply brief to relator’s answer brief, and there is no provision under Gov.Bar R. V(8) for the filing of a reply brief,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion to strike relator’s answer brief be, and hereby is, stricken.