Case ID: nys_92/html/1124-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FRANKEL, Respondent, v. STOCKMAN et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    March 21, 1905.)
    Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Thirteenth District. .Action by Isador Frankel against Samuel Stockman arid another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Reversed. Ignace Irving Apfel, for appellants. Charles Frankel, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The evidence fails to show either an actual or an implied agreement on the part of defendants to pay plaintiff for services rendered to Schwartz. Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event.