Case ID: ad_261/html/0876-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Emma E. Futherer and Others, Respondents, v. David C. Angelidis, Also Known as Daniel G. Angelidis, Appellant, Charles H. Agnew and Others, Defendants.
   Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the twenty-year, and not the six-year, Statute of Limitations applies to the cause of action set forth in the complaint. (See Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 47, 48; Atlantic Dock Co. v. Leavitt, 54 N. Y. 35; Bowen v. Beck, 94 id. 86; Hyde v. Miller, 45 App. Div. 396; Quackenbush v. Mapes, No. 1, 123 id. 242; Hulbert v. Clark, 57 Hun, 558; affd., 128 N. Y. 295; Greenly v. Greenly, 114 App. Div. 640; Anguish v. Blair, 160 id. 52; affd., 216 N. Y. 746.) All concur. (The order denies defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint in an action to recover installments of interest on a bond secured by a second mortgage.) Present — Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.