Case ID: la-ann_26/html/0608-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Ludeling, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 855.
    D. O’Bryan, Agent v. George McVey.
    The possession of the lessee being only tbat of his lessors, when the fact was disclosed hy the answer of the lessee, who is defendant >n this instance, his lessors should have been made parties to the suit which is a hypothecary action against lands alleged to be mortgaged in favor of the plaintiff and owned by the lessors of defendant. No valid judgment could be rendered in the case without tlio parties interested being before the court.
    Appeal from the Sixteenth Judicial District Court, parish of Vermilion. Mouton, J.
    
      D. O'Bryan, Breaux & F. B. King, for plaintiff and appellee. DeBlane <& Ferry, for defendant and appellant.
   Ludeling, C. J.

-This is a hypothecary action against lands alleged to he mortgaged in favor of the plaintiff, and alleged to be in possession of George McVey.

He answered and averred that lie was the lessee of Robertson & Avery, tlie owners of the lands and asked that they might be notified •of this proceeding.

This the district judge refused to order, and judgment was rendered ordering the property to be seized and sold to satisfy the mortgage, unless the lessee paid the debt within ten days after the notification of this judgment. The defendant appealed. Eobertson & Avery were the owners of the lands encumbered with the mortgage, and therefore the third possessors thereof, the possession of the lessee being only that of his lessors; and when this fact was disclosed by the answer of McVey, his lessors should have been made parties to the suit. No valid judgment could be rendered in this case without the parties interested being before the court.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the court a qua be annulled and that the case be remanded to cite the owners and third possessors of the property mortgaged and to be tried de novo.

It is further ordered that the costs of appeal be paid by the appellee.

Eehearing refused.