Case ID: f-appx_460/html/0276-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David William CONN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth E. STOLLE, Sheriff; Thompson, Captain; Bishop, Sergeant; Apfel, Corporal; Jail Staff; Gleason, Deputy Sheriff; Free, Colonel; Schuster, Chief, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 11-7099.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 6, 2011.
    Decided: Jan. 5, 2012.
    David William Conn, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding px-ecedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David William Conn appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Conn v. Stolle, Case No. 1:11-cv-00758-CMH-TCB, 2011 WL 3321136 (E.D.Va. Aug. 2, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and ai-gument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.