Case ID: cust-ct_60/html/1018-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Ford, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. P68/144.
    protests 65/14051 and 65/15607 (Philadelphia).
    No. P68/145.
    protests 66/9095 and 66/14250 (New York).
    Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc. v. United States, Paul Munk & Co., Inc. v. United States,
   Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of brass sink strainers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies, Turner & Company v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 48, Abstract 69651), the claim of tire plaintiffs was sustained.