Case ID: so2d_961/html/1043-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Bruce Lenard GILCHRIST, Appellee.
    No. 5D06-2967.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    July 20, 2007.
    Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
    
      James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Henry T. Swann, III, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Carter, 835 So.2d 259, 262 (Fla.2002) (holding “[t]he trial court is in a better position to identify the probation violator’s motive, intent, and attitude and assess whether the violation is both willful and substantial.”).

PALMER, C.J., THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.