Case ID: so2d_189/html/0506-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. PEARSON, Judge", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

U S 1-163RD STREET CORP., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Dolores GERARDO, Appellee.
    No. 65-1029.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    Aug. 9, 1966.
    Rehearing Denied Sept. 15, 1966.
    
      Sponder & Bloom, North Miami, for appellant.
    Daniel G. Satin, Miami, for appellee.
    Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

By this appeal we are called upon to review a summary final decree of foreclosure entered in favor of the appellee, plaintiff in the trial court.

To the complaint for foreclosure, the defendant filed a general denial answer. Subsequent to taking the deposition of the principal officer of the mortgagor, the plaintiff filed a motion to strike the answer as sham and for entry of a summary final decree. Upon the decree being rendered, this appeal ensued. We find no error and affirm. See: Rule 1.14(a), Florida Rules of. Civil Procedure, 30 F.S.A.; Fink v. Powsner, Fla.App.1958, 108 So.2d 324; McNutt v. Sherrill, Fla.App.1962, 141 So.2d 309; Wingreen Company v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 408; Feng Yeat Chow v. Shaughnessy, S.D.N.Y. 1957, 151 F.Supp. 23.

Affirmed.

PEARSON, Judge

(concurring specially).

I concur in the affirmance because the .affidavit submitted on petition for rehearing did not state a good defense.