Case ID: day_3/html/0279-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Livingston, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rhinelander, Hartshorne and others against Peleg P. Sanford and others.
    September, 1808.
    A motion for mtá guardian to an mtant party, must be in wnlmS> an(l must state the name of the person proposed, and his be
    BRISTOL moved ore tenus for the appointment of a guardian to Peleg P. Sanford, one of the defendants, who was a minor.
   Livingston, J.

This motion is too loose. Whenever there is an application for the appointment of a ,. , , . , , ... guardian, even pro hac vice, it must be by a petition m writing, therein naming the person proposed, and stating his consent to be appointed.

Motion denied.