Case ID: nys_111/html/1132-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. SPRING and KRUSE, JJ.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NEASE, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. Co., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    May 20, 1908.)
    Action by Samuel Nease against the New York Central •& Hudson River Railroad Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

SPRING and KRUSE, JJ.,

dissent, on the authority of Berkery v. Erie R. Co., 55 App. Div. 489, 67 N. Y. Supp. 189, affirmed 172 N. Y. 636, 65 N. E. 1113. See 109 N. Y. Supp. 1139.