Case ID: so3d_157/html/1100-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jonathan A. WALDEN, Petitioner, v. Elizabeth A. WALDEN, Respondent.
    No. 1D14-3972.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    March 9, 2015.
    Stefani K. Nolan and Shachar D. Spiegel of Kenny Leigh & Associates, P.A., Jacksonville; and Brian P. North, Mary Esther, for Petitioner.
    Christopher M. Taylor, Jacksonville, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Welden, 483 So.2d 487, 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (“[W]here the moving party’s allegations raise a colorable entitlement to rule 1.540(b)(3) relief, a formal evidentiary hearing on the motion, as well as permissible discovery prior to the hearing, is required.”).

ROWE, RAY and BILBREY, JJ„ concur.