Case ID: sd_78/html/0293-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HILL, Respondent v. LAMPERT LUMBER COMPANY et al., Appellants
    (101 N.W.2d 396)
    (File No. 9767.
    Opinion filed March 2, 1960)
    Gunderson, Farrar & Carrell, Rapid City, for Defendants and Appellants.
    Burnell Hendricksen and Roswell Bottum, Rapid City, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

For our purposes this suit is similar to Holzworth v. Roth, 78 S.D. 287, 101 N.W.2d 393. While it involves a different lot, a different series of deeds with a different ultimate grantee and an action to foreclose different mechanics liens, it presents in the same circumstances the legal issue of whether a suit in equity will lie. This matter is governed by the opinion in Holzworth v. Roth, supra. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed.