Case ID: ad2d_222/html/0328-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frank Briscuso, as Executor of Mary Garnas, Also Known as Mary E. Garnas, Deceased, Respondent, v Edison Parking Corp. et al., Appellants.
    [635 NYS2d 615]
   —Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Arber, J.), entered on or about May 2, 1995, which granted defendants’ motion for preclusion unless plaintiff served a bill of particulars within 60 days of the court’s order, modified, on the law, to make preclusion unconditional, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

There being a conflict between the court’s decision, which grants preclusion unconditionally, and its order, which grants preclusion conditionally, the decision controls, and the order should be resettled accordingly (DiProspero v Ford Motor Co., 105 AD2d 479, 480). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Asch and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Kupferman, J., dissents in a memorandum as follows: I would remand to the IAS Judge.

The IAS Judge obviously had second thoughts on the matter and should be the one to make the choice.