Case ID: f_229/html/1021-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MARSHALL v. BACKUS, Immigration Com’r.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    February 7, 1916.)
    No. 2486.
    Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the First Division of the Northern District of California ; Maurice T. Dooling, Judge.
    Henry F. Marshall, and Albert Michelson, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
    John W. Preston, U. S. Atty., and Walter E. Hettman, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Gal., for appellee.
    Before GILBERT and ROSS, Circuit Judges, and WOLVERTON, District Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

On the authority of Healy v. Backus, 221 Fed. 358, 137 C. C. A. 166, and Choy Gum v. Backus, 228 Fed. 487, 139 C. C. A. 35, the judgment (213 Fed. 123) is affirmed.