Case ID: sw2d_819/html/0795-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael FOX and Donald Uxa, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. MUNFORD, INC., d/b/a Majic Markets, Michael Towerman, Kenneth A. Goldberg, and Lenette Realty and Investment, Defendants/Respondents.
    No. 59502.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Dec. 24, 1991.
    Laurence D. Mass, Rochelle Kaskowitz, St. Louis, for plaintiffs/appellants.
    R.C. Wuestling, St. Louis, Robert D. Blitz, Suzanne M. Besnia, Howard S. Smot-kin, St. Louis, for defendants/respondents.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of (1) their intentional interference with contract count, as well as (2) their breach of fiduciary duty count.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).