Case ID: nj-misc_10/html/0076-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": ". Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

OSCAR LANGE, PETITIONER-DEFENDANT IN CERTIORARI, v. EUREKA PRINTING WORKS, RESPONDENT PROSECUTOR IN CERTIORARI.
    Argued December 23, 1931
    Decided December 31, 1931.
    Before Justices Trenchard, Daly and Donges.
    -Dor the motion, Peder & Rinzler.
    
    
      Contra, Harley, Cox & Walb erg.
    
   . Per Curiam.

This is an application for a counsel fee in the Supreme Court by the prevailing party in a workmen’s compensation ease where the judgment of the workmen’s compensation bureau was brought into the Supreme Court by certiorari pursuant to Pamph. L. 1931, ch. 388, p. 1217.

Our conclusion is that there is no authority for the award of counsel fee in such case, and the application accordingly is denied, with costs.