Case ID: so2d_581/html/0192-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alan MANDEL, Appellant, v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, Successor by Merger to Commercial Bank & Trust Company, Trustee Under the Will of NAN Peach, Deceased, Appellee.
    No. 90-2704.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 28, 1991.
    Rehearing Denied July 18, 1991.
    Howard, Brawner & Stone, and Philip L. Brawner, Miami, for appellant.
    Swope and Stobs, and Glenn J. Sneider, Miami Shores, for appellee.
    Before LEVY, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from a non-final order appointing a receiver. We affirm.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in appointing a receiver. See Interdevco, Inc. v. Brickellbank Savings Association, 524 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Carolina Portland Cement Co. v. Baumgartner, 99 Fla. 987, 128 So. 241 (1930).

It was not error for the trial court to require only the receiver to post a bond. Shops of Sunset, Ltd. v. Cohen, 551 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Boyd v. Banc One Mortgage Corp., 509 So.2d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Affirmed.