Case ID: ohio-st-3d_67/html/0132-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State ex rel. Russell et al., Appellants, v. Ehrnfelt, Mayor, Appellee.
    [Cite as State ex rel. Russell v. Ehrnfelt (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 132.]
    (No. 93-131
    Submitted April 6, 1993
    Decided August 11, 1993.)
    
      
      Roderick Russell and James Russell, pro se.
    
    
      Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Frank A. DiPiero and James W. Satola, for appellee Walter Ehrnfelt, Mayor.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

R.C. 2731.02 states in part:

“Such writ [of mandamus] may issue on the information of the party beneficially interested.”

In State ex rel. Brophy v. Cleveland (1943), 141 Ohio St. 518, 26 O.O. 87, 49 N.E.2d 175, we held that a nontaxpaying nonresident of a municipal corporation who was merely an agent-purchaser of water for others had no beneficial interest in the municipal water rates. We adhere to that decision. Here, appellants have only a contingent, contractual interest in the rates paid by others.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.