Case ID: njl_115/html/0499-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MINNISINK OIL COMPANY, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT, v. LOTTIE A. MILLER, RESPONDENT.
    Submitted May 31, 1935
    Decided October 9, 1935.
    For the appellant, Collins & Corbin.
    
    For the respondent, Frank Scerbo.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam, in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolesKell, Rafferty, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.