Case ID: ny-super-ct_55/html/0569-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hannah S. Brick, Appellant v. Robert Campbell, Respondent.
    Decided March 6, 1888.
    Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendant dismissing the complaint. The action was tried before the court without a jury.
    Jacob F. Miller, for plaintiff.
    George W. Van Slyck, ■ for defendant.
    Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., Truax and Dugro, JJ.
   Per Curiam.

The questions in this case other than those that arise on the exceptions to the admission or rejection of evidence were before this court on the former appeal herein (54 Super. Ct. 305), and were then decided adversely to the present appellant. An examination of the exceptions that were taken shows that in view of the law of this case as laid ' down by this court, no injury was done to the appellant. Many of the questions excepted to were not answered so as to injure the appellant. Others were not answered at all. The judgment appealed from is affirmed with costs.