Case ID: ri_19/html/0474-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James E. Kenyon vs. Thomas A. Pierce, Adm’r.
    Exceptions, &c.,
    No. 1877.
    INTERVENING IN SUIT ; REMEDY OF CREDITOR.
    RESCRIPT.
    
      Filed May 16, 1896.
    
   Per Curiam.

The motion to take off the entry of discontinuance is denied. The mover is not a party to the suit, and, if the entry were taken off, could not be permitted to intervene in the suit and to prosecute the petition contrary to the wishes of the defendant. Cross, Petitioner, 17 R. I. 568. If he deems that his interests as a creditor of the estate have been pre jit diced by the discontinuance of the petition and settlement of the suit made by the administrator, he can contest the allowance of the administrator’s account in the Court of .Probate.

Charles J. Arms, for motion.

S. W. K. Allen & W. F. Angelí, contra.