Case ID: f-appx_266/html/0514-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Miguel PEREZ-TORRES, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 05-70253.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Nov. 7, 2007.
    Filed Jan. 4, 2008.
    Frank P. Sprouls, Esq., Law Office of Ricci and Sprouls, Dylan Bradley Carp, Esq., Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.
    Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Patricia A. Smith, Esq., Christopher P. McGreal, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before: SCHROEDER, HALL and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
   MEMORANDUM

Miguel Perez-Torres petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ discretionary determination that he failed to satisfy the “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” requirement for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b). We have explicitly held that this court lacks jurisdiction to review a discretionary hardship determination under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i). Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 888 (9th Cir.2003).

Petitioner fails to raise any credible argument that would require us to resolve the question we left open in Romero-Torres. See Id. at 891 n. 5.

We DISMISS the petition for lack of jurisdiction. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.