Case ID: so2d_627/html/0057-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William Andrew BAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-01614.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Nov. 17, 1993.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Cecilia A. Traína, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ron Napolitano, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence in all respects, with the exception of a clerical error in the judgment. On remand, the trial court shall correct the judgment to reflect the jury verdict and the trial court’s oral pronouncement that the conviction on count II was for misdemeanor petit theft rather than grand theft.

RYDER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND; JJ., concur.