Case ID: fla_148/html/0451-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. E. Richardson v. Rogers and Middlebrooks, Inc., a corporation.
    4 So. (2nd) 517
    Division B
    Opinion Filed November 12, 1941
    
      
      Raleigh T. Barber, Donald C. McMullen & Sons, for Plaintiff in Error;
    
      Mabry, Reaves, Carlton & White, and McKay, Macfarlane, Jackson & Ferguson, for Defendant in Error.
   Per Curiam.

Careful study of the record in this case convinces us that the trial court erred in instructing a verdict for the defendant at the conclusion of the introduction of testimony on behalf of the plaintiff, therefore, the judgment is reversed.

, Brown, C. J., Terrell, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.