Case ID: so2d_626/html/1033-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William Bruce HARPER, Jr., and Melinda C. Harper, his wife, and Sarah Ellen Poston Harper, Appellants, v. UNITED NATIONAL BANK, a National Banking Association, Appellee.
    No. 93-923.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 9, 1993.
    
      Harper & Hewitt, and William Bruce Harper, Jr. and Robert G. Hewitt, Miami, for appellants.
    Scharlin, Lanzetta and Cohen, and Lewis R. Cohen, Miami, for appellee.
    Before JORGENSON, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal a partial summary judgment determining liability in a mortgage foreclosure action. We affirm.

Summary judgment was properly entered in this case because there was no genuine issue of material fact on the issue of liability. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966). Appellants’ affidavit in opposition to summary judgment established that they defaulted on the promissory note and mortgage by failing to pay the principal balance due upon maturity. On these undisputed facts, appel-lee, United National Bank, was entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law on liability.

Affirmed.