Case ID: f-appx_31/html/0381-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Roberto HERNANDEZ-LOPEZ, aka, Juan Carlos Hernandez-Lopez, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 00-10585. D.C. No. CR-00-00906-ROS.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 11, 2002.
    Decided Feb. 20, 2002.
    Before B. FLETCHER, T. NELSON and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Roberto Hernandez-Lopez appeals his guilty plea conviction and the 55-month sentence imposed for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Hernandez-Lopez’s attorney has moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), on the ground that there are no issues to raise on appeal.

As part of his plea agreement, Hernandez-Lopez waived his right to appeal the judgment and sentence. Because he received a sentence consistent with the plea agreement, and there is no evidence that the waiver of the right to appeal was not knowing or was not voluntary, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. United States v. Aguilar-Muniz, 156 F.3d 974, 976 (9th Cir.1998).

Because our independent review of the record discloses no arguable issues, counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted and the appeal is

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.