Case ID: f2d_933/html/0798-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael COOPER, husband, in his own capacity and as parent of Abram and Adam Cooper, minors; Lidia Cooper, wife, in her own capacity and as parent of Abram Cooper and Adam Cooper, minors, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Clarence DUPNIK, Sheriff, Pima County; Tom Taylor, an employee of Pima County Sheriff’s Department; Weaver Barkman, an employee of Pima County Sheriff's Department, Defendants-Appellants. Michael COOPER, husband, in his own capacity and as parent of Abram and Adam Cooper, minors; Lidia Cooper, wife, in her own capacity and as parent of Abram Cooper and Adam Cooper, minors, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Clarence DUPNIK, Sheriff, Pima County, Defendant, and City of Tucson; Tucson Police Department; Peter Ronstadt; Karen Wright; Gene Scott; Timothy O’Sullivan; Kay McCall, Defendants-Appellants.
    Nos. 88-15661, 88-15685.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    May 23, 1991.
    Michael P. Callahan, Deputy County Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for defendants-appellants Clarence Dupnik and Tom Taylor.
    David L. Berkman, Murphy, Goering, Roberts & Holt, Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellant Weaver Barkman.
    David F. Toone, Kimble, Gothreau & Nelson, Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellant Peter Ronstadt.
    
      Stephen M. Weiss, Karp, Stoklin & Weiss, Winton D. Woods, Michael J. Bloom, Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiffs-appellees.
    Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, D.W. NELSON, GANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and THOMAS G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
   Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.