Case ID: ark_344/html/0625-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WESTERN CARROLL COUNTY AMBULANCE DISTRICT (aka WCCAD); Bayard Biossat, Jack Faulkner, and William W. Woodward, in Their Official Capacities as Commissioners of WCCAD; City of Eureka Springs, Arkansas; Carroll County, Arkansas; Carolyn Williams, Phillip Jackson, Kay Phillips, Cindy Vowell, and Shirley Doss, In Their Official Capacities as Assessor, County Judge, Collector, Treasurer, and Clerk for Carroll County, Arkansas v. C. Rodney JOHNSON, Leonard R. Fowler, and Marvin D. Hoffman
    00-1271
    42 S.W.3d 495
    Supreme Court of Arkansas
    Opinion delivered May 8, 2001
    
      
      John Casteel, Prosecuting Att’y, for appellants.
    
      Oscar Stilley, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

On February 8, 2001, appellants timely filed their brief in this matter. Under Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-4(b), appellee had thirty days from February 8, 2001, to file his brief with this court. According to counsel for appellee, he attempted to mail his brief on March 5, 2001, but the brief was sent to a mail recovery center in Atlanta, Georgia. Once the mistake was discovered, he filed a motion for belated brief on May 2, 2001, and he also tendered appellee’s brief on that date. In his motion, counsel for appellee states that appellants’ counsel, Mr. John Casteel, acknowledged timely receipt of appellee’s brief and authorized appellee’s attorney to state that Mr. Casteel has no opposition to the court allowing the belated filing of the brief.

Unlike the requirement for timely filing a record, as discussed in Ortho-Neuro Medical Assoc. v. Jeffery, 343 Ark. 466, 37 S.W.3d 577 (2001), the court has discretion to consider the belated filing of a brief tendered late. We note that the motion was filed before the case was taken under submission by this court, and that opposing counsel does not object to the belated filing.

Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-4(b) clearly states that appellee’s brief is due thirty days after the filing of appellant’s brief. Counsel made no inquiries concerning this case from the time his brief was due until the motion for a belated submission of the brief was tendered on May 2, 2001. Therefore, a copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. See Board of Trustees v. Stodola, 326 Ark. 581, 931 S.W.2d 443 (1996).

Motion granted.