Case ID: njl_98/html/0571-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LOUIS SCHEINMAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. FANNIE BLOCH ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Submitted December 11, 1922
    Decided February 1, 1923.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 97 N. J. L. 404.
    For the appellants, Clarence Kelsey.
    
    For the respondents, Frederick K. Hopkins.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenhetmer, Williams, Gardner, Ackérson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 13.

For reversad — None.