Case ID: so2d_473/html/0721-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Larry LEATHERWOOD, Appellant, v. ROYAL OAKS RENTALS, a company, Royal Oaks Condominium Association, a Florida corporation, Frederick H. Miller, and St. Jean Roofing, a Florida corporation, individually, jointly and severally, Appellees.
    Nos. 84-677, 84-679.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 8, 1985.
    Larry Leatherwood, pro se.
   ON MOTION FOR REHEARING/CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We withdraw our per curiam affirmance of December 19, 1984, and reverse the order quashing service on Royal Oaks Rentals. A motion alleging a defect in personal jurisdiction should set forth sufficient facts to demonstrate the defect in service and how the defect can be cured. See Bodden v. Young, 422 So.2d 1055, 1056 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Over 30 Association v. Blatt, 118 So.2d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960).

We remand for further proceedings below.

HERSEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

HURLEY, J., dissents without opinion.