Case ID: sw3d_473/html/0209-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David Germaine WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 102604
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    
    Filed: October 27, 2015
    Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, Saint Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
    Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65105, for respondent.
    Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Germaine White (“Movant”) appeals the judgement of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion without an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purposé. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015). 
      
      . All rule references are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2015) unless otherwise indicated.