Case ID: so2d_751/html/0125-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William PEARSON Appellant, v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD., Appellee.
    No. 3D98-2773.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Jan. 12, 2000.
    Stuart H. Share, Miami, and Mark T. Packo, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    
      Hicks & Anderson and Mark Hicks and Dinah S. Stein, Miami; Canning & Murray, Miami, for appellee.
    Before JORGENSON, COPE, and FLETCHER, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Clement v. Rousselle Corp., 372 So.2d 1156, 1158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)(“A defendant who has answered with a general denial, is entitled to prove, and to argue to the jury, that the accident was due solely to the negligence of a person not party to the suit.”), cert. denied, 383 So.2d 1191 (Fla.1980).