Case ID: so2d_586/html/0451-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Interest of A.D.J. and D.L.J., each a child, Appellee.
    Nos. 90-2797, 90-2798.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Sept. 18, 1991.
    Rehearing Denied Oct. 24, 1991.
    Daniel A. Smith, Jacksonville, for appellant.
    John L. Sullivan, HRS, Jacksonville, for appellee.
    
      Melissa P. Webb, Smith & Hulsey, Jacksonville, for guardian ad litem.
   PER CURIAM.

The trial court did not err in denying the motion for recusal, Moser v. Coleman, 460 So.2d 385 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), or in finding clear and convincing evidence to support the termination of appellant’s parental rights. In the Interest of D.J.S. and J.S.G., 563 So.2d 655, 662 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (en banc). Accordingly, the order under review is affirmed.

BOOTH, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.