Case ID: nj-eq_77/html/0588-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

City of Paterson, complainant-respondent, v. East Jersey Water Company, defendant-appellant.
    [Argued July 6th and 7th, 1910.
    Decided November 14th, 1910.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in 74 N. J. Eq. (4 Buch.) 49.
    
    
      Mr. Thomas F. Medran, for the respondent.
    
      Messrs. Collins & Corbin, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed bjr Vice-Chancellor Emery in the court below.

For affirmance — The Chirp-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Voohhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgb, Vroom, Dill — 12.

For reversal — None.