Case ID: f-appx_418/html/0242-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Melvin QUICK, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-6869.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 8, 2011.
    Decided: March 21, 2011.
    Melvin Quick, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Melvin Quick appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United, States v. Quick, No. 3:96-cr-00134-FDW-6 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 2009). We deny Quick’s pending motion to compel the district court to rule on his § 3582(c)(2) motion and his motion for transfer to a handicapped accessible facility. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.