Case ID: sw3d_236/html/0124-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Judith A. DECKER-WEGENER, Appellant, v. Michael H. WEGENER, Respondent.
    No. ED 89380.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Oct. 23, 2007.
    
      Harold G. Johnson, Mitchell D. Johnson, Saint Ann, MO, for appellant.
    Michael A. Gross, Joseph F. Yeckel, Cynthia M. Fox, Saint Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Judith Decker-Wegener (“Wife”) appeals the judgment granting Michael Weg-ener’s (“Husband”) motion for summary judgment on Wife’s petition in equity seeking to reopen the parties’ dissolution decree and set aside the decree’s finding that maintenance is non-modifiable. We find that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Husband. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).