Case ID: how-pr_4/html/0367-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Erastus Sparrow, plaintiff in error, vs. Elizabeth Kingman, defendant in error.
    
      —Judgment reversed, with a venire dé novo by the Supreme Court; costs to abide the event.
    
    H. S. Dodge, for plaintiff in error;
    H. Hill, Jr., for defendant in error.
   This was a case deciding that a quit claim deed, from the husband, did not estop his grantee, or one holding under him, from showing that the husband was not seized of such an estate as entitled his widow to dower. (Reported, 1 Comstock, 242.)