Case ID: nj-misc_3/html/0194-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

EDISON FIXTURE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GEORGE GOLDBERG, TRADING, ETC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
    Argued October 8, 1924
    Decided February 5, 1925.
    On appeal from tlie District Court of the city of Camden
    Before Justices Teen chard, Mikturn and Lloyd.
    Por the appellant, Herman B. J. Weclcstein.
    
    For the appellee, Frank 17. Davis.
    
   Per Curiam.

Our examination of the record discloses no error justifying reversal. This case was argued with Edison Fixture Co., Inc., v. Copoulos, No. 475, of the present term, but it differs from that in a material matter. Here, the evidence permitted of the inference by the trial judge, sitting without a jury, that the-plaintiff deceived the defendant as to the fact that he was signing a contract, by the false representation that he was signing, as a matter of form, a paper having no obligatory force.

This testimony furnishes a basis for the jndment in favor of the defendant, which will be affirmed, with costs.