Case ID: sw3d_576/html/0615-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael SUTTLES, Appellant.
    No. ED 106859
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    Filed: June 11, 2019
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Stephen P. Ranz, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
    ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Eric Schmitt, Attorney General, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.
    Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Michael Suttles appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for statutory sodomy, sexual misconduct with a child and furnishing pornographic material to a minor. There was no error in the admission of expert testimony regarding the general characteristics of children disclosing allegations of sexual abuse. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).