Case ID: so2d_443/html/1085-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY and Kevin Dowling, Appellants, v. Dwight BARNES, Appellee.
    No. 83-1593.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Jan. 24, 1984.
    
      Shutts & Bowen and John T. Kolinski and Sally M. Richardson, Miami, for appellants.
    duFresne & Bradley and Amy Lehman and Elizabeth duFresne, Miami, for appel-lee.
    Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We find that publication of slander can occur in intra-corporation communications. See: Glynn v. City of Kissimmee, 383 So.2d 774 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Drennen v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, 328 So.2d 52 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Arison Shipping Company v. Smith, 311 So.2d 739 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Restatement 2d of Torts, § 596. We do not read Pledger v. Burnup & Sims, Inc., 432 So.2d 1323 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) to prohibit such a finding. We also find no error in this case in submitting the question of qualified privilege to a jury. Hartley & Parker, Inc. v. Copeland, 51 So.2d 789 (Fla.1951); Abraham v. Baldwin, 52 Fla. 151, 42 So. 591 (1906); Riggs v. Cain, 406 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 3th DCA 1981); Lewis v. Evans, 406 So.2d 489 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

Therefore the final judgment on the jury verdict be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.