Case ID: pa_575/html/0033-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

834 A.2d 504
    COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Kenneth CATER, Appellant.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Submitted Jan. 10, 2003.
    Decided Oct. 21, 2003.
    Erika P. Kreisman, for Kenneth Cater, Appellant.
    Michael Wayne Streily, Amy Elizabeth Constantine, Karen E. Edwards, Pittsburgh, for the Com. of PA, Appellee.
    Before CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and LAMB, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of October, 2003, the order of the Superior Court is reversed and the case is remanded to the PCRA court to consider whether appellant is entitled to file a Petition for Allowance of Appeal to this Court nunc pro tunc based upon his appellate counsel’s alleged ineffectiveness in failing to file a timely petition for allowance of appeal. See Commonwealth v. Liebel, 825 A.2d 630 (Pa.2003). Jurisdiction is relinquished.