Case ID: nw2d_592/html/0600-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "AMUNDSON, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

1999 SD 43
    VIRONMENT, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Charles E. LIGHT, Defendant and Appellee.
    No. 20557.
    Supreme Court of South Dakota.
    Considered on Briefs Jan. 14, 1999.
    Decided April 7, 1999.
    Dennis C. McFarland, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, for plaintiff and appellant.
    Timothy L. James of James & Associates, Yankton, South Dakota, for defendant and appellee.
   AMUNDSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] This is a companion case to Yankton Ethanol v. Vironment, #20558, the cases involve identical facts and two identical issues:

1. Whether the court erred in dismissing plaintiffs complaint as barred by the period of limitation set forth in 11 USCS 546(a)(1)(A).
2. Whether the court erred in granting the amended motion to dismiss based upon SDCL 47-7-50.

As to these issues, our decision in Yankton Ethanol controls the motion to dismiss in this case. Therefore, this case is also reversed and remanded

[¶ 2.] MILLER, Chief Justice, SABERS, KONENKAMP, and GILBERTSON, Justices, concur.