Case ID: cust-ct_58/html/0883-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Oliver, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BEFORE THE FlRST DIVISION,
    April 25, 1967
    No. P67/118.
    No. P67/119.
    No. P67/120.
    No. P67/121.
    No. P67/122.
    Louis Marx & Co. v. United States,
    protest 326711-K (New York).
    Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United States,
    protests 62/18615, etc. (Cleveland).
    Craig Panorama, Inc., et al. v. United States,
    protests 64/16799, etc. (Los Angeles).
    L. E. McIntyre and Company v. United States,
    protests 64/16812 and 64/16849 (Los Angeles).
    Paul E. Sernau, Inc. v. United States,
    protest 66/2747 (New York).
   Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of James G. Wiley Co., a/c Ungar Electric Tools, Inc. v. United States (49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.