Case ID: ohio-st-3d_85/html/0389-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Alice Robie Resnick, J., Cook, J., \n      Lundberg Stratton, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State ex rel. Schmieder, Appellee, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellants.
    [Cite as State ex rel. Schmieder v. Indus. Comm. (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 389.]
    (No. 98-1755
    Submitted February 23, 1999
    Decided May 5, 1999.)
    
      Fell, Marcus & Koder Co., L.P.A., and George N. Fell II, for appellee.
    
      Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Robert D. Strauss, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant Industrial Commission.
    
      Eastman & Smith Ltd., Thomas J. Gibney and Margaret A. Mattimoe, for appellant Daimler Chrysler Corporation.
   The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Resnick, J., dissents.

Cook, J., dissents.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

Alice Robie Resnick, J.,

dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Cook, J.,

dissenting. Because I would return this cause to the commission pursuant to State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245, I respectfully dissent.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I dissent and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and reinstate the order of the Industrial Commission.