Case ID: br_568/html/0302-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William D. CARROLL, Jr.; Carolyn K. Carroll; Pamela Carroll Alonso, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Samera L. ABIDE; XYZ Insurance, Defendants-Appellees
    No. 16-30320
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Date Filed: 12/12/2016
    William D. Carroll, Jr., Pro Se
    Carolyn K. Carroll, Pro Se
    Pamela Carroll Alonso, Pro Se
    Steven Paul Lemoine, Esq., Law Offices of Robert H. Schmolke, Baton Rouge, LA, for Defendant-Appellee
    
      Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

This pro se appeal has been considered in the light of the briefs and pertinent parts of the record. The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated by the district court, Carroll v. Abide, No. 3:14-CV-00503, 2016 WL 1048992, at *3 (M.D. La. 11 March 2016).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.