Case ID: so2d_548/html/1087-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte James Donald LOWE. (Re James Donald Lowe v. State).
    88-1246.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Aug. 25, 1989.
    J. Louis Wilkinson and Virginia A. Vinson, Birmingham, for petitioner.
    Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We deny defendant’s petition for certio-rari. However, in so doing, we are not to be understood to agree with the rationale used by the Court of Criminal Appeals to conclude that Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), does not apply in this case. See the standards we set forth in Ex parte Branch, 526 So.2d 609 (Ala.1986).

WRIT DENIED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, ALMON, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.