Case ID: so2d_701/html/0305-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte David DINKINS. (Re David Dinkins v. State).
    1952004.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Aug. 1, 1997.
    James M. Byrd, Mobile, for petitioner.
    Bill Pryor, atty. gen., and J. Thomas Lev-erette, asst. atty. gen., for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is quashed as improvidently granted.

In quashing this writ, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HOOPER, C.J., and ALMON, HOUSTON, COOK, BUTTS, and SEE, JJ., concur.