Case ID: ad2d_23/html/0896-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Irving Warren et al., Individually and as Stockholders of Presto Box Corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Leon Summit et al., Respondents.
   In an action to enjoin defendants from using the name “Presto” and for an accounting and damages, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered March 10, 1964 upon the court’s written decision, after a non jury trial, which dismissed the complaint upon the merits. Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents. In our opinion, the record amply supports the finding below that no agreement was made among the corporate shareholders not to nse the name “Presto” after the dissolution, but that the intention of the parties was that all the shareholders of the dissolving corporation could continue to use the art work of the corporation, including the word “Presto.” Beldock, P. J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.