Case ID: f-appx_286/html/0436-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edgar PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephanie WALKER, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 08-15688.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted July 14, 2008.
    
    Filed July 24, 2008.
    Edgar Perry, pro se.
    Stephanie Walker, pro se.
    Before: SCHROEDER, LEAVY and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

A review of the record, appellant’s opening brief, and the parties’ responses to the order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.