Case ID: sw3d_393/html/0620-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Scott T. EISSLER, Claimant/Appellant, v. ALLIED WATERPROOFING CO., Employer, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
    No. ED 98753.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    March 12, 2013.
    John J. Ammann, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    
      Ninion S. Riley, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LISA VAN AMBURG, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Scott T. Eissler, appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the order of the Appeals Tribunal dismissing his appeal from the deputy’s determination. The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the order of Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).