Case ID: sw3d_278/html/0713-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Derek BOMAR, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent.
    No. ED 91161.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Feb. 24, 2009.
    Nadine Nunn, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Nikki Loethen, Gary Gardner, Co-Counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before: NANNETTE A. BAKER, C.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Derek D. Bomar appeals the trial court’s judgment upholding the Director of Revenue’s revocation of his driver’s license pursuant to Section 302.505 RSMo (2007). Bomar argues that the arresting officer lacked probable cause to arrest him because he was not driving the car and his car was not on a public highway at the time of arrest.

We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). Ai opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memoran-

dum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).