Case ID: f-appx_671/html/0769-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alex NEGRETE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-11018 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Date Filed: 12/16/2016
    Robert J. Brady, Jr., Wifredo A. Ferrer, Emily M. Smachetti, Nalina Sombuntham, U.S. Attorney’s Office, MIAMI, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Alex Negrete, Pro Se
    Before HULL, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Scott Sakin, appointed counsel for Alex Negrete in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L,Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Negrete’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.