Case ID: f-appx_57/html/0340-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Coleman M. OSBURN; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee; and Jake MILLER, Trustee.
    No. 02-35394.
    D.C. No. CV-01-03039-EFS.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 10, 2003.
    
    Decided March 13, 2003.
    Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Chapter 7 debtors Coleman M. Osburn and Lola M. Osburn appeal pro se the district court’s judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s summary judgment in favor of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in their adversary proceeding seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and damages. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo, DeRoche v. Arizona Industrial Commission (In re DeRoche), 287 F.3d 751, 754 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm.

Summary judgment was proper because the Osburns failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the IRS failed to make timely assessments against them, see 26 U.S.C. § 6501(c), or whether the IRS failed to follow proper procedures when it levied on their residence, see 26 U.S.C. § 6334(e).

Appellants’ remaining contentions lack merit.

Appellee’s motion to strike is denied.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.