Case ID: p2d_545/html/0512-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HENRIOD, Chief Justice:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SKYLINE LEASING, a Utah Corporation, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DATACAP, a Division of International Computer Systems, Inc., a Utah Corporation, et al., Defendants and Appellants.
    No. 13971.
    Supreme Court of Utah.
    Jan. 9, 1976.
    Kay M. Lewis, of Jensen & Lewis, Salt Lake City, for defendants and appellants.
    Lorin N. Pace, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.
   HENRIOD, Chief Justice:

Appeal from a non jury judgment, incident to a computer equipment lease, where defendant Barnes was adjudged liable as guarantor. Affirmed with costs to Skyline.

The only parts of the record we have before us are the pleadings and the lease, where Skyline was the Lessor and defendant International was Lessee. Barnes, according to the record after discovery process, and presumably from the testimony, none of which latter anyone bothered to designate or refer to here, was found and decreed by the trial court to have been signatory to the lease, as an individual and' not as an agent of the corporation.

There was considerable talk in the defendant’s brief about claimed evidence that is not before us and about statutes claimed to be pertinent as a defense mechanism, but which were not specially pleaded, and about which we do not concern ourselves for the first time on appeal.

ELLETT, CROCKETT, TUCKETT, and MAUGHAN, J J., concur.