Case ID: f-appx_229/html/0242-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard C. FOY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION; Elizabeth H. Whitsel; Ken Lewis; Camey P. McMaster, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 06-1324.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 4, 2007.
    Decided: June 6, 2007.
    Richard C. Foy, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Pyle Dion, McGuirewoods, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Richard C. Foy appeals the district court’s orders granting the individual defendants’ motions to dismiss his Title VII, malicious discharge, and defamation claims, denying Foy’s motion for summary judgment, and granting summary judgment to Defendants Whitsel and Bank of America Corporation on Foy’s claims of hostile work environment, sex discrimination, retaliation, malicious discharge, and defamation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Foy v. Bank of America Corp., No. 5:04-cv-00944-FL (E.D.N.C. June 15, 2005; Feb. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.