Case ID: f-appx_86/html/0650-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas Lattie MCLAMB, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. W.F. DALIUS, Warden; Kathleen Hawk-Sawyer, Director; J. Frank Bradsher, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 03-7753.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 29, 2004.
    Decided Feb. 9, 2004.
    Thomas Lattie McLamb, Appellant pro se.
    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM.

Thomas Lattie McLamb appeals the district court’s order and order on reconsideration denying his Bivens claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McLamb v. Dalius, No. CA-03-662-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 8 & Oct. 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED 
      
      
        Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).