Case ID: f-appx_693/html/0210-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Albert Shaw NELSON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 17-6347
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 18, 2017
    Decided: July 20, 2017
    
      Albert Shaw Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, KING, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Albert Shaw Nelson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his motion to reconsider the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Nelson, No. 5:95-cr-00333-CMC-5 (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED