Case ID: ri-dec_8/html/0324-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "FROST, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frank D. McKendall vs. Joseph Weisman, et als.
    No. 66330.
    June 10, 1932.
    For plaintiff: Harlow & Boudreau.
    For defendants: Sallet & Ress.
   FROST, J.

Heard on plaintiff’s motion for new trial after verdict for defendant.

This is an action brought to recover on four promissory notes against tbe four makers and tbe two endorsers thereof. It was tried with another action on promissory notes between tbe same parties, numbered 63577.

Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial is granted for tbe reasons expressed in rescript filed in No. 63577.