Case ID: ad3d_50/html/0914-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George Cruz, Appellant.
    [854 NYS2d 676]
   Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Braun, J.), rendered May 9, 2006, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the trial court’s verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. While the defendant argues that the testimony of the People’s witnesses was inconsistent and incredible, resolution of issues of credibility is primarily a matter to be determined by the factfinder, which saw and heard the witnesses (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633, 644-645 [2006]). Its determination is accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88 [1974]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power (see CPL 470.15 [5]), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]; People v Prahalad, 295 AD2d 373 [2002]; People v Booker, 158 AD2d 700 [1990]). Skelos, J.P., Covello, Eng and Leventhal, JJ., concur.