Case ID: so2d_548/html/0737-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William CONDER and Deloris Conder, Appellants, v. Richard C. RITCHEY and Mary Louise Ritchey, Appellees.
    No. 88-2789.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Aug. 22, 1989.
    Rehearing Denied Sept. 27, 1989.
    Greenfield & DuVal, and Harvie S. Du-Val, North Miami, for appellants.
    Atlas, Pearlman & Trop, and Robin Cor-win Campbell, Ft. Lauderdale, for appel-lees.
    Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Shevin, 354 So.2d 372 (Fla.1977); Union Oil of Cal., Amsco Div. v. Watson, 468 So.2d 349 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 479 So.2d 119 (1985); Neil v. South Fla. Auto Painters, Inc., 397 So.2d 1160 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Procacci v. Zacco, 402 So.2d 425 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).