Case ID: so2d_168/html/0139-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James SHAKESPEARE, Petitioner, v. BURDICK CONSTRUCTION, Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers’ Mutual Casualty Insurance Company, and the Florida Industrial Commission, an administrative agency, Respondents.
    No. 33672.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Oct 23, 1964.
    C. J. Budzinski, Miami, for petitioner.
    D. J. McDonald, Coral Gables, for Bur-dick Construction, Pennsylvania Thresher-men & Farmers’ Mutual Casualty Ins. Co.
    Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 30, 1964.

f We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the ¡record and brief of the petitioner leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied:

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.