Case ID: sw_286/html/0221-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BERRY, J. ' PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DANIEL v. STATE.
    (No. 10079.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    June 16, 1926.)
    Criminal law &wkey;l092(7), 1099(6).r
    Statement of facts and bills of exceptions, filed more than 90 days after notice of appeal is given, cannot be considered on appeal, in view of Code Cr. Proc. 1925, art. 760, § 5.
    Commissioners’ Decision.
    Appeal from District Court, Hill County; Horton B. Porter, Judge.
    Howard Daniel was convicted of unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquor, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    N. J. Smith, of Hillsboro, for appellant.
    Sam D. Stinson, State’s Atty., of Austin, and Bobt. M. Lyles, Asst. State’s Atty., of Groesbeck, for the State.
   BERRY, J. '

The offense is the unlawful transporting of intoxicating liquor, and the punishment is one year in the penitentiary.

The notice of appeal was given on the 15th day of October, 1925, and the bills of exceptions and statement of facts were not filed until January 23, 1926. We have repeatedly held that a statement of facts and bills of exceptions, filed more than 90 days after the notice of appeal is given, cannot be considered by this court. In this ruling we are following the plain terms of the statutes. Section 5, art. 760, 1925 Revision C. C. P.

In the absence of a statement of-facts and bills of exception, there is no error manifest by this record, and the judgment is in all things affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.