Case ID: so2d_665/html/0377-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Giacomo A. TESORIERO, Appellant, v. Kathleen D. TESORIERO, Appellee.
    No. 94-3652, 94-3653 and 95-0586.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Jan. 3, 1996.
    Giacomo A. Tesonero, pro se.
    Kathleen D. Tesonero, pro se.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm both the final judgment of dissolution of marriage and the later order holding appellant in contempt. There is an error, however, in the Income Deduction Order. Although the text of paragraph 1 correctly states that the deduction is to be made biweekly, the calculations at the end of the paragraph incorrectly state weekly. On remand, the trial court shall correct this error.

DELL, FARMER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.