Case ID: so2d_682/html/0675-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles S. ZITO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 96-2024.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Nov. 6, 1996.
    Charles S. Zito, Belle Glade, pro se.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carol Cobourn Asbury, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. However, as in Freeman v. State, 679 So.2d 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), we certify to the supreme court the following question as-oné of great public importance:

IS STATE V. GRAY, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla.1995) RETROACTIVE?

AFFIRMED.

DELL, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.