Case ID: nys_79/html/1136-15.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LANSING v. SCHENECTADY RY. CO.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.
    December 12, 1902.)
    Action by-Caroline Paige Lansing against the Schenectady Railway Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Order (77 N. Y. Supp. 889) reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion to vacate injunction denied, with $10 costs. Injunction modified by striking out that part thereof which reads as follows: “And that they be further enjoined.- and restrained, until the further order of the-court, from interfering with the restoration of the street by the plaintiff herein, and from, in any way using the pole which it has put upon the premises,”—upon opinion in Paige v. Railway Co. (decided herewith) 79 N. Y. Supp, 266.

KELLOGG, J., dissenting.