Case ID: so2d_912/html/0586-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Andrew GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 2D04-3633.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Dec. 29, 2004.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Boyd v. State, 880 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). After this court held in Boyd that a claim of vindictive sentencing is not cognizable in a motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), the Fifth District in Johnson v. State, 877 So.2d 795 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), reversed a circuit court order denying a rule 3.800(a) motion and remanded for consideration of the claim of vindictive sentencing raised in the motion. We certify direct conflict with Johnson.

Affirmed; conflict certified.

DAVIS, KELLY, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.