Case ID: sw3d_318/html/0795-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Darryl K. NELSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 93053.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Aug. 31, 2010.
    Margaret M. Johnston, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Richard A. Starnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before ROY L. RICHTER, C.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J. and GEORGE W. DRAPER, III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darryl K. Nelson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).