Case ID: wash_76/html/0700-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 11326.
    Department One.
    December 5, 1913.]
    Feed D. McCullough, Respondent, v. Puget Sound Realty Associates, Appellant.
      
    
    Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered March 14, 1913, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
    Affirmed.
    
      Oorwin 8. Shank and Horatio O. Belt, for appellant.
    
      Louis E. Shela, for respondent.
    
      
       Reported in 136 Pac. 1146.
    
   Per Curiam.

This is a suit upon an express parol contract for the recovery of a money judgment. There was a judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed.

The appeal involves questions of fact only. We cannot say upon the record that the court was in error in concluding that the plaintiff had established his case by a preponderance of the evidence.

Affirmed.