Case ID: f-appx_201/html/0487-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Robert MacKellar STORMS, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 05-16153.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 11, 2006.
    
    Filed Sept. 14, 2006.
    Camille Damm, Esq., Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Robert MacKellar Storms, Aliso Viejo, CA, pro se.
    Before: PREGERSON, T.G. NELSON and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Robert MacKellar Storms appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his petition for writ of coram nobis. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Storms contends that he is entitled to relief because of fraudulent conduct by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms which he could not have discovered until he was released from prison. We conclude that the district court did not err in finding that Storms is not entitled to coram nobis relief. See Matus-Leva v. United States, 287 F.3d 758, 760 (9th Cir.2002).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.