Case ID: njl_112/html/0503-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PASQUALE IMPERATO, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. CONCORD CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Argued February 8, 1934
    Decided April 12, 1934.
    For the respondent, Kalisch <& Kalisch.
    
    For the appellant, Frank 0. Turner.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.