Case ID: f-appx_108/html/0448-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Wilson RACKLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-10558.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 11, 2004.
    
    Decided Aug. 20, 2004.
    Serra Marie Tsethlikai, Russell Marsh, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Ralph E. Ellinwood, Esq., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: PREGERSON, KOZINSKI and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

The district court did not abuse its discretion when it found that defendant violated a condition of his supervised release by engaging in sexual conduct with a minor. A.R.S. § 13-1405; see United States v. Verduzco, 330 F.3d 1182, 1184 (9th Cir.2003). The record contains sufficient evidence to support the finding that defendant and the minor engaged in sexual intercourse as defined by A.R.S. § 13-1401(3).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.