Case ID: so2d_262/html/0249-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rossie JONES, Jr., a/k/a Jr. Jefferson, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 71-988.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 12, 1972.
    Kenneth A. Studstill, of Twyford & Studstill, Titusville, for appellant.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nelson E. Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and briefs filed in this cause. We are of the opinion that the prosecutor’s statements concerning the defendant’s previous criminal activity were properly admitted under the rule enunciated in Williams v. State, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 654. The remainder of defendant’s arguments are equally without merit. We therefore,

Affirm.

WALDEN, MAGER and OWEN, JJ., concur.