Case ID: sw3d_295/html/0232-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Mark MOORE, Appellant.
    No. ED 92216.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Oct. 20, 2009.
    Timothy Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    
      Chris Koster, Terrence M. Messonnier, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Moore (“defendant”) appeals the judgment of the trial court on his conviction for first-degree assault and armed criminal action. Defendant argues the trial court plainly erred in denying his motion for continuance and in admitting evidence of the out-of-court identification of defendant.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).