Case ID: so3d_252/html/0382-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rubens SOUZA, et al., Appellants, v. NI HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellee.
    No. 3D18-67
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed August 1, 2018
    Bernhard Law Firm, PLLC, and Andrew J. Bernhard, for appellants.
    Waldman Barnett, P.L., and Glen H. Waldman, Michael A. Azre, and Eleanor T. Barnett, for appellee.
    Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Koster v. Sullivan, 160 So.3d 385, 389 (Fla. 2015) (holding that if the return of service is regular on its face, service of process is presumed to be valid, and the party challenging service has the burden of overcoming that presumption by clear and convincing evidence); Robles-Martinez v. Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP, 88 So.3d 177 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (same).