Case ID: njl_68/html/0414-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, PROSECUTOR, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. INHABITANTS OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON, IN THE COUNTY OF MERCER, AND MERCER COUNTY TRACTION COMPANY, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
    Argued June 24, 1902
    Decided November 17, 1902.
    • On error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiff in error, Alan II. Strong and Charles F. Gummere.
    
    For the defendant in error, John H. Baches.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court in this cause is affirmed, on the grounds set forth in the opinion of Mr. Justice Garret-son in that.court, reported under the same title in 38 Vroom 477.

For affrmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Collins, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yoori-iees, Yroom. 10.

For reversal—None.