Case ID: sw2d_888/html/0408-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lynn DEERFIELD, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. PARK PLAZA APARTMENT, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. 65459.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Dec. 13, 1994.
    Mark D. Hirschfeld, Clayton, for appellant.
    H. Todd Iveson, Green, Hoffmann & Dankenbring, Clayton, for respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff filed a claim in small claims court seeking the return of her security deposit held by defendant. After judgment for defendant in small claims court, plaintiff petitioned for a trial de novo in the circuit court. Following the trial de novo, the circuit court entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals; we affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).