Case ID: f-appx_670/html/0133-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jan STEVENS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-6610
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: October 20, 2016
    Decided: November 3, 2016
    Jan Stevens, Appellant Pro Se. Kellen Sean Dwyer, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appel-lee.
    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jan Stevens appeals the district court’s order denying his post-judgment motion to correct a clerical error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Stevens, No. 1:10-cr-00446-LO-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 18, 2016). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED