Case ID: nj-eq_63/html/0803-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Louis Hanneman et al., complainants and respondents, v. Matilda Richter et al., defendants and appellants.
    [Filed June 23d, 1902.]
    
      Mr. Charles J. Roe, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. Charles H. Hartshorne, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated by the chancellor in the opinion delivered in the court below. See 17 Dick. Ch. Rep. 365.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom—14.

For reversal—Hone.