Case ID: ga-l-rep_1/html/0200-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Blandford, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hamilton vs. Eden Gold Mining Co. et al.
    
    Eaa-s vi, or Inmcxction', Dol’oi.ak. Deeds. Estates. Contracts. Mines and Mining. (Before Judge Harris.)
   Blandford, J.

1. Whether in a deed to land a clause reserving to tlm grantor all minerals and mining privileges thereon constitutes a reservation or exemption, and whether it would be void as being a sav'ing as large as the grant, is not decided, because the question was not argued before this court; Shep. Touch., 80; 7 W. & S., 184.

2. Under the facts of this case, there was no error in refusing to grant an injunction to restrain one who held under the grantee of a deed containing such a provision from using certain water on the land and a certain mill, for pounding and washing ore taken by him from an adjacent lot. No harm can come to the complainant thereby; and it is directed that the case be held for a full and final trial before the court and jury.

J. S. James; P. H. Brewster; C. D. Camp, for plaintiff in error.

Thomas W. Latham; A. I. Bartlett, for defendants.

Judgment affirmed.