Case ID: ad3d_11/html/0898-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Joseph A. Kraemer, Appellant, v Andrea Kalish, Respondent.
    [782 NYS2d 221]
   Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Joan S. Kohout, J.), entered April 23, 2003. The order denied petitioner’s objections to an order of a Hearing Examiner dismissing the petition for a downward modification of petitioner’s child support obligation.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order of Family-Court denying his objections to a Hearing Examiner’s order that dismissed his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation. We affirm the order inasmuch as the record on appeal is insufficient to enable this Court to determine whether petitioner established a significant change of circumstances and reduced income to entitle him to a downward modification of his child support obligation. “Petitioner therefore has failed to present ‘a sufficient record to allow appellate review of this issue’ ” (People ex rel. Person v Beilein, 306 AD2d 864, 865, [2003], quoting People v Barney, 99 NY2d 367, 374 [2003]; see also Yoonessi v State of New York, 289 AD2d 998, 1000 [2001], lv denied 98 NY2d 609 [2002], cert denied 537 US 1047 [2002]; Usyk v Track Side Blazers, 182 AD2d 1125 [1992]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.