Case ID: va_13/html/0659-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PEE CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Craigen et al. v. Thorn et al..
    Thursday, October 6th, 1808.
    The transcript of the record, in this case, not having been brought up within two terms after the appeal granted, the appel-lees’ counsel moved to dismiss the appeal; which was opposed by the counsel for the appellants, on the ground that, although he had used every exertion to obtain the necessary information from his client as to the causes which produced the delay in sending up the record, yet his remote situation had prevented him from acquiring the information sought, through the medium of the post-office.
    
      
      Practice — Dismissal oí Suits — Redocketing.—On this question the principal case is cited in foot-note to Thornton v. Corbin, 3 Call 221; Casanova v. Kreusch, 21 W. Va. 739; Perry v. Horn, 21 W. Va. 741.
    
   PEE CURIAM.

Eet the appeal stand dismissed, with costs, unless the appellants shew cause to the contrary on or before the 2d day of December.

Afterwards (on the 8th of November) cause was shewn against dismissing the appeal; the above order nisi was set aside, and the appeal placed on the docket.