Case ID: wis_20/html/0031-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Cole, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ramsay vs. Davis.
    
      Practice — Meeersdl of Judgment — Five per cent, damages.
    
    1. A judgment will not be reversed because no notice of trial had been served on the party against whom it was rendered, unless there was a motion to set it aside on that ground.
    2. The appeal in this case having manifestly been taken for delay, the judgment is affirmed with five per cent, damages, in addition to the seven per cent, usually allowed.
    ARPEAD from the Circuit Court for Mikvautcee County.
    
      I. P. Walker, for appellant.
    
      B. Mariner, for respondent.
   Cole, J.

"We are furnished with no briefs by the appellant, and we are therefore ignorant of the points upon which he relies for a reversal of the judgment. Neither is there any bill of exceptions. The printed case states that there was no notice of trial served. This objection is not sustained by the record and papers returned to this court. But even if it were true that no notice of trial was given, the defendant should have moved in the court below to set aside the judgment on that ground. "W"e think the appeal was manifestly taken for delay, and we therefore afñrm tire judgment with fiye per cent, damages in addition to tire seven percent, damages given on affirmance'of judgments.

By the Oourt. — Ordered accordingly.