Case ID: so2d_527/html/0829-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rudolph B. BENDA, Appellant, v. Maria Oliveria BENDA, Appellee.
    No. 87-2638.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    March 2, 1988.
    Donald G. Criscuolo of Genet & Miller, North Miami Beach, for appellant.
    Marjorie G. Miller, Hollywood, for appel-lee.
   UPON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

The motion for rehearing is addressed to this court’s per curiam affirmance without opinion dated January 14,1988, which decision we hereby withdraw and substitute the following:

This appeal is from an order denying appellant’s Motion To Restrict Removal of Minor Child from the Jurisdiction. We affirm. However, such affirmance shall be without prejudice to either party seeking a change or modification of the custody of the minor child in the future.

DOWNEY, LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.