Case ID: f-appx_378/html/0356-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stephen W. STONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SENECA SOUTH CAROLINA, CITY OF, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 09-1693.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 22, 2010.
    Decided: May 12, 2010.
    
      Mary C. McCormac, Clemson, South Carolina, for Appellant. Vance J. Bettis, Gignilliat, Savitz & Bettis, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stephen W. Stone appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Seneca on all of Stone’s claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stone v. City of Seneca, South Carolina, No. 8:07-cv-03401-HFF (D.S.C. May 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.