Case ID: f-appx_692/html/0689-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Willie PENNIX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sgt STANDFORD; Lt Drummond; Office of the Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 17-6259
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 22, 2017
    Decided: June 27, 2017
    Willie Pennix, Appellant Pro Se. Ankush Nayar, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Willie Pennix appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his .42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pennix v. Standford, No. 1:16-cv-01643-RDB, 2017 WL 639225 (D. Md. Feb. 16, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED