Case ID: ohio-st-3d_90/html/0206-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Douglas, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State ex rel. Kmart Corporation, Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al.; Beachman, Appellant and Cross-Appellee.
    [Cite as State ex rel. Kmart Corp. v. Indus. Comm. (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 206.]
    (No. 00-642
    Submitted September 12, 2000
    Decided October 25, 2000.)
    
      Pickrel, Schaeffer & Ebeling, David C. Korte and Michelle D. Bach, for appellee and cross-appellant.
    
      hammer & hammer and David H. Swanson, Jr., for appellant and crossappellee.
   The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Douglas, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and reinstate the order of the Industrial Commission, which granted compensation for permanent total disability.

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.