Case ID: ad3d_54/html/0782-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sean Stephen, Appellant.
    [862 NYS2d 906]
    Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (McKay, J.), dated February 16, 2005, which denied his motion for resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2004 (L 2004, ch 738) on his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, which sentence was originally imposed, upon his plea of guilty, on November 20, 2003.
    Ordered that the order is affirmed.
   The defendant’s contention that the resentencing provisions of the Drug Law Reform Act of 2004 (L 2004, ch 738, §§ 1-41) violate his right to equal protection of the laws (NY Const, art I, §11; US Const, 14th Amend) and that he was subject to cruel and unusual punishment by the application of those provisions is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Vasquez, 54 AD3d 783 [2008] [decided herewith]; People v Duke, 40 AD3d 872 [2007]), and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]; People v Baumann & Sons Buses, Inc., 6 NY3d 404, 408 [2006]; People v Felix, 58 NY2d 156, 161 [1983]).

The defendant’s contentions with respect to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005 (L 2005, ch 643, § 1) are not properly before this Court. Spolzino, J.P., Fisher, Carni and Dickerson, JJ., concur.