Case ID: mont_94/html/0019-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MR. CHIEF JUSTICE CALLAWAY", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

KELLY, Respondent, v. WILLIAMS, Administrator, Appellant.
    (No. 7,019.)
    (Submitted March 14, 1933.
    Decided March 27, 1933.)
    [21 Pac. (2d) 58.]
    
      Mr. L. C. Myers and Messrs. Freeman, Thelen & Freeman, for Appellant, submitted a brief; Mr. J. P. Freeman argued the cause orally.
    
      Mr. N. A. Rotering, for Respondent, submitted a brief and argued the cause orally.
   MR. CHIEF JUSTICE CALLAWAY

delivered the opinion of the court.

This action, brought by the plaintiff against her husband, is grounded upon an alleged tort caused by the husband in negligently operating an automobile in which she was riding. During the pendency of the action the husband died, and Williams, the administrator of his estate, was substituted as party defendant. The plaintiff received judgment, from which the defendant appealed.

The ease is ruled directly by the decision of this court in Conley v. Conley, 92 Mont. 425, 15 Pac. (2d) 922, wherein it was held that the Montana Married Woman’s Act does not authorize a married woman to sue her husband for a personal tort. All the points presented to support the judgment here were decided adversely to plaintiff’s arguments in the Conley Case. It is worthy of remark that the legislature seems satisfied with the statutory construction announced in that case, which was decided October 26, 1932. During its recent session a bill designed to enlarge the rights of the spouses to sue one another, including actions for personal torts, did not receive favorable action even in the house in which it originated.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the district court of Silver Bow county, with direction to dismiss the action.

Associate Justices Angstman, Matthews, Stewart and Anderson concur.