Case ID: f-appx_464/html/0854-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chad Edwin LANGFORD, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 11-12332
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    April 5, 2012.
    Gray M. Borden, Leura Garrett Canary, Brandon K. Essig, Tommie Brown Hard-wick, Monica Anne Stump, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Montgomery, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Daniel Gary Hamm, Daniel G. Hamm, PC, Montgomery, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before MARCUS, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Daniel G. Hamm, appointed counsel for Chad Edwin Langford, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merits of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Langford’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.