Case ID: gibb-surr_2/html/0558-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Arnold, S.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Petition of David M. Peyser, as Administrator of Theresa Peyser, Deceased.
    
      (Surrogate's Court, New York County,
    
    
      Filed October, 1898.)
    Discovbky — Recovery or Assets — Insufficient Denials.
    An answer in a proceeding for the recovery of assets which denies the allegation of the petition that intestate left certain property which has come into the possession of the parties cited, and also avers that one of such parties is the owner of all the property described in the, petition or is, entitled to .¡possession. thereof, is, insufficient to require a dismissal of the proceeding.
    
      Application, for examination of respondents as to certain assets in their possession belonging to' the estate.
    Mitchell E. Erlanger, for petitioner; Platzek, Strooek & Herzog, for respondents.
   Arnold, S.

The respondents • deny, by the answers filed by them, that the decedent left any property answering the description of same contained in the petition, or otherwise, except that they admit that she left certain personal property consisting of a. number of bonds, a small amount of money in bank, a claim against one of the respondents, and some wearing apparel, which they are willing to deliver to the petitioner; and aver that one of the respondents is the owner of all the property specifically described in the petition, or is entitled to the possession thereof. These answers do not appear to me to be sufficient under section 2709 of the Code of Civil Procedure to require the dismissal of the proceeding. The petitioner alleges that the decedent was possessed at the time of her decease of certain jewelry, furniture, moneys and other effects, and that these have come into the possession of the respondents, but these allegations are denied by the latter, and they do not admit that any property which ever belonged to the decedent is in their possession or under their control, except as before stated, nor is there any admission that any such property so described ever existed. If they had admitted the existence of such property, that they had the same in their possession or under their control, and then claimed to be the owners thereof, or entitled to the possession of the same by virtue of some lien thereon or special property therein, the nature and extent of which had been stated in the answer, 'the petition might properly be dismissed" exhept as-to those articles which they admit belong to the estate; but I do not see how they can be permitted to deny the existence of property and at the same time claim ownership thereof or right of possession thereto. The petitioner is entitled to an examination of the respondents for the purpose of discovering what knowledge or information they have in respect to any personal property belonging to the decedent’s estate, and such examination should proceed.

Decreed accordingly.

Note. — This decision was affirmed by the Appellate Division in Matter of Peyser, 35 App. Div. 447.