Case ID: ad2d_50/html/0924-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Regal Extract Company, Inc., Appellant, v H. Schoenfeld & Sons, Inc., et al., Respondents.
   — In a proceeding to vacate an award made in arbitration against petitioner and in favor of respondent H. Schoenfeld & Sons, Inc., in which proceeding said respondent cross-moved to confirm the award and to direct that judgment be entered in its behalf, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered August 22, 1975, in favor of H. Schoenfeld & Sons, Inc., upon an order of the same court, dated August 7, 1975, which denied the application and granted the cross motion. Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent H. Schoenfeld & Sons, Inc. The sales note sent by the broker A.A. Sayia & Company, Inc., which contained a provision for arbitration, was sufficient to make that provision binding on both parties to this appeal (see Matter of Gera Fabrics Div. Peter Fuller Enterprises [Liberty Fabrics of N. Y.] 14 Misc 2d 489, affd 6 AD2d 1001). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.