Case ID: sw2d_877/html/0166-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Keith JOHNSTON, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 63788.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    May 24, 1994.
    Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for movant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joanne E. Beal, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before CRANDALL, P.J. and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Keith E. Johnston, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).