Case ID: so3d_101/html/0911-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel RANGEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D11-2920.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Nov. 21, 2012.
    Daniel Rangel, Arcadia, pro se.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melanie Dale Surber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant raising his claims in a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Any such motion filed by Appellant shall not be considered successive so long as Appellant does not revisit the issue that was the subject of the trial court’s June 11, 2012 order.

MAY, C.J., POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.