Case ID: sw3d_457/html/0388-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William HUNTLEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 101698
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    FILED: March 10, 2015
    Amanda Page Faerber, Missouri Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

William Huntley (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s “Conclusions of Law and Order” denying Movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief and request for evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).