Case ID: or-app_111/html/0108-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Submitted on record and briefs December 19, 1991,
    convictions affirmed and remanded for resentencing January 22, 1992
    STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RICARDO SANCHEZ MEDINA, Appellant.
    
    (C90-05-32645; CA A67219)
    823 P2d 453
    Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Irene B. Taylor, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.
    Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
    Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions by a jury for delivery of a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance as part of a scheme or network. ORS 475.992; OAR 253-04-002(3), App 4. He did not demur to the indictment but, before sentencing, challenged the constitutionality of the scheme or network language. He has preserved his challenge to the sentence imposed. The state concedes that the sentence is improper. State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434, 806 P2d 130, rev dismissed 312 Or 76, 815 P2d 701 (1991). We accept that concession.

Because we remand for resentencing on that ground, we need not address defendant’s other assignment of error.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.