Case ID: minn_114/html/0516-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SUSAN M. RICHARDSON v. E. H. RICHARDSON and Others.
    
    February 24, 1911.
    Nos. 16,754. — (139).
    
    Case followed.
    Richardson v. Richardson, supra, page 12, followed. [Reporter.]
    Action in the district court for Renville county to recover possession of certain lots in the village of Morton. Tire separate answer of E. H. Richardson contained substantially the same allegations as the complaint in the case of Richardson v. Richardson, page 12, supra. The reply contained substantially the allegations of the answer in the former case. Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings was granted, Qvale, J. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order of court, defendants appealed.
    Affirmed.
    
      John A. Dalzell, for appellants.
    
      Rieke & Hamrum, for respondent.
    
      
      Reported in 130 N. W. 5.
    
    
      
      October, 1910, term calender.
    
   Per Curiam.

The question involved in this action was presented and decided in Richardson v. Richardson, supra, page 12, 130 N. W. 4. The facts made the basis of plaintiff’s cause of action in that case were presented as a defense in this ease, and the decision there rendered controls.

Order affirmed.