Case ID: mcgrath_1/html/0554-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WALSH (Pros. Attorney) vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (St. Clair),
    No. 15172½,
    64 N. W., 1045.
   To set aside an order overruling relator’s objections to the consideration of defendant’s answer, in a proceeding for the sale of certain land for delinquent taxes, on the ground that no copy of said answer had been served on relator ten days prior to the first day of the term, and also to set aside an order dismissing said proceedings, because (1) the order published lacked the seal of the court, or a scroll in place thereof, and (2) because there are no dollar marks in the columns or at the head of the columns in the published lists indicating that a money decree is asked for.

Order to show cause denied October 24, 1895.

The court say: “In this matter it appears upon the face of the application that the court,” for the purpose of having the determination by the Supreme Court, “held the objections made to the proceedings good. The court should have passed upon each of the points raised upon its merits. The questions suggested are more properly reviewable on appeal, and the court below should have regarded the matter in that light. In any event, we do not feel called upon to review questions arising during the course of a proceeding, at least until the final judgment of the court below has been given after full consideration. The application will therefore be denied.”