Case ID: so2d_889/html/0985-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Byron R. CLAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D04-3784.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Dec. 22, 2004.
    Byron R. Clay, Miami, pro se.
    Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David M. Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant filing in the trial court a facially sufficient Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion that identifies specific non-hearsay, record evidence that supports his claim. Burgess v. State, 831 So.2d 137 (Fla.2002); Wachter v. State, 868 So.2d 629 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Appellant may raise the alleged violation of Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), in a rule 3.850 motion if he can establish a valid exception to the two-year time limitation. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b).

FARMER, C.J., STONE and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.