Case ID: f2d_201/html/0512-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

C. Howard HOOK and W. W. Miller, Doing Business as a Partnership Under the Name and Style of Hook & Miller, v. HOOK & ACKERMAN, Inc., Appellant.
    No. 1082.
    United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
    Argued Jan. 22, 1953.
    Decided Feb. 6, 1953.
    Harry Price, New York City (Stoneciptier & Cunningham, by Charles L. Cunningham, Pittsburgh, Pa., Matthew Sidney Birón, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Harold S. Ackerman and Hook & Ackerman, Inc.
    William B. Jaspert, Pittsburgh, Pa., for C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller, ind. and d/b/a Hook & Miller; and R. O. Graffius.
    Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Points presented in this appeal were all discussed in the opihion of Judge Stewart in the district court. Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc., D.C.W.D.Pa.1952, 103 F.Supp. 790. We think that he was right and affirm for the reasons set out in his opinion.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.