Case ID: ny-super-ct_45/html/0598-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LOUISE DOUAI WEHLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WILLIAM C. CONNER, Sheriff, &c., Defendant and Respondent.
    Before Sedgwick and Van Vorst, JJ.
    
      Decided April 7, 1879.
    Questions appearing on the face of the record, which the court of appeals, in its reversal of the judgment appealed from, do not pass upon, but which, if they had substance, would lead to an affirmance, must be regarded on a new trial ordered by that court (when the questions are for the first time raised), as of no substance.
    Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment entered on a verdict for plaintiff, for six cents damages, directed, by the court.
    
      Charles Wehle, for appellant.
    
      Vanderpoel, Green & Cuming, attorneys, and Almon Goodwin, of counsel, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Opinion for affirmance, with costs.