Case ID: f-appx_164/html/0934-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard HINDS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-11166
    D.C. Docket No. 04-60072-CR-KAM.
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Jan. 31, 2006.
    Abe Anselheart Bailey, Abe A. Bailey, P.A., Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Anne R. Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Before ANDERSON, DUBINA and HULL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

In this direct appeal, Hinds challenges only his sentence. In light of the Eleventh Circuit’s recent decision, United States v. Garcia, 405 F.3d 1260 (11th Cir.2005), which was handed down after the decision of the district court, we vacate and remand Hinds’ sentence for the purpose of determining Garcia’s relevance, if any, to the instant case. We express no opinion on the merits of the issues in the case.

The judgment of conviction is AFFIRMED, but the sentence is VACATED and REMANDED.