Case ID: so2d_445/html/0662-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harry O. SEYMOUR, et al., Appellants, v. H.H. HARRIS, III, Appellee.
    No. AT-294.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Feb. 21, 1984.
    
      George Ralph Miller, DeFuniak Springs, for appellants.
    Walter A. Steigleman of Dewrell, Blue & Brannon, Fort Walton Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The trial judge did not err in finding that the option agreement was extended by the appellee’s tender to appellant of the sums required under the terms of the agreement. And although we might have afforded the appellee relief different from that provided for in the final judgment, we cannot say that the equitable relief fashioned by the trial court in this specific performance case constituted an abuse of discretion. We find no reversible error.

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, WIGGINTON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.