Case ID: f-appx_291/html/0039-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Antonio MARCOS-MORA, aka Jose Quintero-Arias, Defendant— Appellant.
    No. 07-30171.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 22, 2008.
    
    Filed Aug. 15, 2008.
    Thomas J. Hanlon, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for PlaintiffAppellee.
    Kristine K. Olmstead, Esq., Federal Defenders of Eastern Washington & Idaho, Yakima, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: B. FLETCHER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   ORDER

The memorandum disposition filed on July 30, 2008, is withdrawn. A replacement memorandum disposition will be filed concurrently with this order.

MEMORANDUM

Antonio Marcos-Mora appeals from the 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being an alien in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Marcos-Mora contends that the district court violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(h) by failing to give adequate notice of its intent to depart upward from the Sentencing Guidelines range. The district court announced its intention to consider the sentence increase at the beginning of the sentencing hearing and Marcos-Mora had a full opportunity to respond. We see no plain error.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.