Case ID: f-appx_46/html/0581-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Christopher BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Naomi SCHWARTZ, et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 02-55288.
    D.C. No. CV-01-07861-CM.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 9, 2002.
    
    Decided Sept. 20, 2002.
    Before HUG, O’SCANNLAIN and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Christopher Brown appeals pro se the district court’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal without leave to amend of his complaint against the County of Santa Barbara, County Supervisor Naomi Schwartz and County Counsel Shane Stark.

The district court correctly dismissed Brown’s First Amended Complaint because it was time-barred and he failed to establish any proper ground for tolling of the one-year statute of limitations. Fink v. Shedler, 192 F.3d 911, 914 (9th Cir.1999) (42 U.S.C. § 1983); Johnson v. State of California, 207 F.3d 650, 653 fn. 2 (9th Cir.2000) (42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1985).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.