Case ID: ad_223/html/0820-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John Duncan, Respondent, v. Charles A. Stoneham and Another, as Partners, Trading under the Firm Name of Charles A. Stoneham & Co., and Individually, Appellants, Impleaded with Others, Defendants.
    Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on June 25, 1927, and also from an order dated June 9, 1927, and entered in said clerk’s office.
   Per Curiam.

When this action is viewed in the light of a conspiracy to defraud (of which there was ample evidence to sustain the finding of the jury) resulting in transferring the obligation to the bankrupt and leaving the assets with the appellants, the alleged errors largely disappear. Those which remain must be disregarded for the reason stated in the opinion per curiam in.the case of Harford v. Stoneham (ante, p. 820), herewith handed down. The judgment and order appealed from should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs. Present-— Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and Proskauer, JJ. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.