Case ID: ny_103/html/0678-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Earl, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Estate of Elias W. Cady, Deceased.
    (Argued October 26, 1886;
    decided November 23, 1886.)
    The following is the mem. of opinion herein:
    “ We have carefully read and considered the evidence in this case and find it to be abundant to sustain the findings of the surrogate; and those findings conclude us. We agree in the main with the opinions pronounced by the surrogate and at the General Term, and it would be a waste of labor to travel over the same grounds in the exposition of the law applicable to the facts of this case in them so fully and ably set forth.
    
      “ The judgment should be affirmed, with costs against the appellant.”
    
      George E Goodrich and H. V. Howland for appellant.
    
      
      S. D. Halliday for respondents.
   Earl, J.,

reads mem. for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.