Case ID: misc2d_19/html/0781-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael. J. Prudenti, Respondent, v. Catherine L. Nash, Appellant.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    September 25, 1959.
    
      Terry S. Finch for appellant.
    
      Robert Swaybill and Benjamin Schwarts for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The provisions of the Civil Practice Act (§ 1410 et seq.) do not authorize the maintenance of summary proceedings against the life tenant herein. (Matter of Bigelow, 67 Misc. 545; see, also, Real Property Law, § 33.)

The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $30 costs to the tenant, and petition dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below.

Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.