Case ID: sw2d_896/html/0505-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Albert SPICER, Defendant/Appellant. Albert SPICER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    Nos. 62158, 65527.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    April 11, 1995.
    Rosalynn Koch, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Kocot, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury for first degree robbery, § 569.020, RSMo 1994. He was sentenced in accord with the jury’s assessment to a twelve year prison term. He also appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).