Case ID: f-appx_670/html/0087-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carlton CLAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carl MANIS, Warden/Administrator; J.A. Harmon, Institutional Hearing Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 16-6315
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: October 19, 2016
    Decided: October 24, 2016
    Carlton Clay, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before SHEDD, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carlton Clay appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C, § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Clay v. Manis, No. 2:16-cv-00036-AWA-LRL (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED