Case ID: ny-st-rep_62/html/0869-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mayham, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Filed May 26, 1894.
    Robert Dansinger et al., Resp’ts, v. Edward C. White, App’lt.
    
      8. & L. M. Brown, for app’lt; Young .& Kellogg (L. H. Northwp, of counsel), for resp’ts.
   Mayham, P. J.

The conclusions of law reached by the learned judge who tried this case seems to be the proper legal deductions, based upon the facts found by him. The facts found by the judge seem to be based upon undisputed evidence, or upon conflicting evidence, upon which a finding either way would be sustained on appeal. We have carefully examined the various objections and exceptions made by the defendant to the rulings of the trial judge and find no error for which the judgment should be reversed. An opinion, therefore, seems unnecessary. Judgment affirmed, with costs.