Case ID: so2d_550/html/0496-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William deForest THOMPSON, Appellant, v. Tobitha Crofton THOMPSON, Appellee.
    No. 88-1125.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Oct. 11, 1989.
    Rehearing Denied Nov. 17, 1989.
    Opinion Clarified Jan. 17, 1990.
    Edna L. Caruso of Edna L. Caruso, P.A. ■ and Montgomery, Searcy & Denney, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Jane Kreusler-Walsh of Klein, Beranek & Walsh, P.A. and Law Offices of Ronald Sales, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order adjudicating appellant in contempt. See Kaylor v. Kaylor, 466 So.2d 1253, 1254 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), rev. dismissed, 500 So.2d 530 (Fla.1987). However, because it is conceivable that the amount of periodic alimony awarded to ap-pellee could be affected by a decision of the Florida Supreme Court in Thompson v. Thompson, No. 74,419, we remand with direction to withhold enforcement of the contempt order, pending a decision therein. The husband’s obligations pursuant to the trial court’s final judgment are in no way altered by this decision.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WARNER, JJ., concur.