Case ID: f-appx_440/html/0186-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Taylor Stone WITT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CABLE AD CONCEPTS, INCORPORATED, a Washington corporation; Northland Cable Communications Corporation, a Washington corporation, Defendants-Appellees, and Cable Ad Concepts; Northland Cable Communications Corporation, Defendants.
    No. 11-1400.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 21, 2011.
    Decided: July 25, 2011.
    Taylor Stone Witt, Appellant pro se. Thomas Allen Bright, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Taylor Stone Witt appeals the district court’s order denying as untimely her motion to amend her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. As Witt filed her motion after the district court dismissed her complaint with prejudice, the motion was clearly untimely. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.