Case ID: f-appx_41/html/0662-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Linwood Earl CHANDLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A.D. NETHERLAND, Acting Captain; W.M. Penn, Lieutenant; David Barnes, Doctor; L. Collins, Inmate Adjustment Hearing Officer; Alton Baskerville, Warden, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 02-6220.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted July 18, 2002.
    Decided July 24, 2002.
    Linwood Earl Chandler, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Linwood Earl Chandler, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and agree that Chandler’s complaint fails to state a claim. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Chandler v. Netherland, No. CA-01-1911 (E.D.Va. Mar. 12, 2002). We also deny Chandler’s motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.