Case ID: so2d_401/html/1161-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re the ESTATE OF Helen G. RUST, Deceased. George SHAMAS, former Personal Representative of the Estate of Helen G. Rust, Appellant, v. Edgar C. BUNDY, Personal Representative of the Estate of Helen G. Rust; Leychester Bonura and Richard Rust, Appellees.
    No. 80-1847.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Aug. 4, 1981.
    Shalle Stephen Fine, Miami, for appellant.
    Edward C. Vining, Jr., Philip Freidin, Charles 0. Farrar, Jr., Miami, for appellees.
    Before BARKDULL, SCHWARTZ and BASKIN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We agree with the trial court’s ruling granting a motion for involuntary dismissal at the conclusion of the opponents’ case on the ground that they had failed to make a prima facie showing that the challenged will had been procured by undue influence. See, Heasley v. Evans, 104 So.2d 854, 857 (Fla.2d DCA 1958); see generally, In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla.1971).

Affirmed.