Case ID: ohio-law-abs_3/html/0298-22.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "ROBINSON, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 18691
    Mary I. Reinbolt v. Joseph F. Reinbolt.
    Error to the Court of Appeals of Sandusky county.
    857. NUNC PRO TUNC ENTRIES—Court cannot make after term, except to make entry truthful.—And not to alter its conclusion.
   ROBINSON, J.

1. The power of the trial court to make an entry nunc pro tunc after term, does not extend beyond the power to make the journal entry speak the truth.

,2. A trial court is without power to alter his conclusion by nunc pro tunc entry at a term subsequent to the term of the original entry.

Judgment affirmed.

T..^?nes’ Matthias, Day, and Allen, JJ., concur. Kmkade, J., not participating.