Case ID: ohio-st_101/html/0512-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte Berger: Berger v. Frietchen et al.
    
      Contempt — Commitment by notary public — Cross-examination of adverse parly by deposition — Sections 11497 and 11526, General Code — Habeas corpus.
    
    (No. 16347
    Decided March 16, 1920.)
    Error to the Court of Appeals of Richland county.
    
      Mr. C. H. Workman and Mr. C. E. McBride, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Messrs. Brucker,' Henkel, Matee & Brucker, for defendants in error.
   Judgment affirmed on authority of In re Rauh, 65 Ohio St., 128.

Judgment affirmed.

Jones, Matthias, Johnson, Wanamaker and Robinson, JJ., concur.