Case ID: nc_70/html/0458-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "ByNüM, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROB’T. H. AUSTIN, County Treasurer, v. HENRY T. CLARKE
    All questions of practice and procedure as to amendments and continuances arising on atrial in the Court below, are nrthe discretion of the presiding Judge, from whose judgment thereon there is no appeal.
    C. C. P. sec. 133.
    Civil actjoN, motion to file an amended answer, tried by Moore, J., at the Fall Term, 1873, of the Superior Court of EdgecoMbe County.
    The plaintiff', Treasurer of Edgecembe County sued the defendant, the former Chairman of the Court of Pleas and. Quarter Sessions of that county, for the balance of a fund in his hands, belonging to the county. Defendant answers the complaint, and the plaintiff demurred to the answer. Ilis .Honor sustained the demurrer, whereupon the plaintiff moves for judgment, and defendant moves for time to file amended answer. The plaintiff’s motion is refused and time given to defendant.
    From this judgment plaintiff appealed.
    
      
      Battle cé Son, for appellant.
    No counsel contra in this Court.
   ByNüM, J.

The C. C. P. invests the Court with ample powers, in all questions of practice and procedure, both as to amendments and continuances, to be exercised at the discretion of the J udge presiding, who is presumed’, best, to know what orders and what indulgence will promote the ends of justice, in each particular case- With the exercise of this discretion, we cannot interfere, and it is not the subject of appeal. C. C. P., sec. 133.

There is no error.

Pee Cueiam. Judgment affirmed.