Case ID: sw2d_998/html/0043-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Timothy STRAUSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 73498.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    May 18, 1999.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 27, 1999.
    Application for Transfer Denied Sept. 21, 1999.
    
      Dave Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Timothy Strauss was convicted of one count of felony stealing, Section 570.030, RSMo 1994, and filed a motion to vacate judgment and sentence under Rule 29.15. Movant now appeals from the judgment denying his motion without an evi-dentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).