Case ID: nys_94/html/1145-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ELLENBOGEN, Respondent, v. S. C. BECKWITH SPECIAL AGENCY et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    June 22, 1905.)
    Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District. Action by Samuel K. Ellenbogen against the S. C. Beckwith Special Agency and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.
    Reversed in part.
    Frank A. Hutson, for appellants.
    Abraham A. Joseph, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The execution of the undertaking by the S. C. Beckwith Special Agency was not properly proven, and the judgment as against that defendant must be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. There was legal proof of execution by the sureties, and the judgment against them must be affirmed, with costs.