Case ID: a2d_506/html/1152-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Maine v. Robert HARDING.
    Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.
    Submitted March 4, 1986.
    Decided March 25, 1986.
    Janet T. Mills, Dist. Atty., Kevin J. Re-gan, Asst. Dist. Atty., Auburn, for the State.
    Peters & Randlett, Thomas P. Peters, II, Lewiston, for defendant.
    Before NICHOLS, ROBERTS, VIOL-ETTE, WATHEN, GLASSMAN and SCOL-NIK, JJ.
   MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Robert Harding appeals his conviction in Superior Court, Androscoggin County, of aggravated assault, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 208 (1983), contending that the sanction imposed on the State for discovery violations was inadequate. Harding also objects to a jury instruction, which he had requested, concerning a witness not available for trial. We conclude that the sanction imposed on the State was within the court’s discretion, and we find no obvious error in the jury instruction.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.