Case ID: ad3d_89/html/1096-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Judith Thomas, Petitioner, v Eileen O’Rourke et al., Respondents.
    [933 NYS2d 594]
   The record contains substantial evidence to support the respondents’ determination terminating the petitioner’s participation in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program (see 24 CFR 982.552 [b] [2] [2010]; Matter of Friend v Mulligan, 16 AD3d 685, 686 [2005]; Matter of Douglas v Lannert, 272 AD2d 327 [2000]). In addition, the notice of termination adequately apprised the petitioner of the violations upon which the termination of her benefits from the program was based (see Matter of Block v Ambach, 73 NY2d 323, 333 [1989]; Matter of Friend v Mulligan, 16 AD3d at 686).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Dillon, J.P, Angiolillo, Florio and Dickerson, JJ., concur.