Case ID: sw2d_874/html/0413-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

State of California, ex rel. Rosita M. JONES, et al., Respondent, v. Raymond MANNING, Appellant.
    No. WD 47435.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Feb. 15, 1994.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 29, 1994.
    Application to Transfer Denied May 26, 1994.
    Richard L. Colbert, Kansas City, for appellant.
    Claire C. McCaskill, Pros. Atty., Raoul C. Stitt, Cindy M. Flick, Asst. Pros. Attys., Jackson County, Kansas City, for respondent.
    Before HANNA, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and FENNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a paternity action. The putative father asserts error in: (1) the admission of his blood test on the grounds the Uniform Parentage Act (U.P.A.) should not have applied; and, (2) the admission of evidence of the child’s birth date, which differed from that stated in the pleadings, on the grounds it did not give him an adequate opportunity to prepare his defense. The judgement establishing paternity is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).