Case ID: sw3d_493/html/0477-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jeremy Roger HARLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    ED 103110
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: July 12, 2016
    Margaret M. Johnston, Woodrail Cen-tre, 1000 West Nifong,- Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, for Appellant.
    Chris Foster, Attorney General, Mary H. Moore, Asst. Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, for Respondent.
    Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Mary K. Hoff and Roy L. Richter, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

■ Jeremy R. Harley appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying after evi-dentiary hearing his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief based -on claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.-

-We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we affirm. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only;' setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).