Case ID: njl_112/html/0088-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOHN A. BOEHME, RESPONDENT, v. SOPHIE SHAPIRO, APPELLANT.
    Submitted October 27, 1933
    Decided January 5, 1934.
    For the respondent, Matlack & Laulman.
    
    For the appellant, William Newcorn.
    
   Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchaed, Paeker, Lloyd, Case, Hehee, Peeskie, Yan Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.