Case ID: f-appx_284/html/0511-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Timothy Jon ROBLES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 07-56270.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 18, 2008.
    
    Filed July 3, 2008.
    Timothy Jon Robles, San Pedro, CA, pro se.
    Christopher M. Brunwin, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
    Before: THOMAS, W. FLETCHER and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Timothy Jon Robles appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his petition for writ of coram nobis. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Robles contends that the Parole Commission acted without authority when it retroactively recalculated his sentence upon parole revocation and reinstated a term of special parole. He also contends that special parole was not authorized by the statute of conviction. We conclude that the district court did not err in denying Robles coram nobis relief. See Matus-Leva v. United States, 287 F.3d 758, 760 (9th Cir.2002).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.