Case ID: f-supp-2d_495/html/0712-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nathaniel ROBERTS, et al., Plaintiff(s), v. MAHONING COUNTY, etc., et al., Defendant(s).
    No. 4:03 CV 2329.
    United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.
    Aug. 2, 2006.
    Robert P. Armbruster, Armbruster, Kelley, Kot, Honeck & Baker, Akron, OH, for Plaintiffs.
    Sharon K. Hackett, Linette M. Strat-ford, Paul J. Gains, Office of the Prosecuting Attorney, Youngstown, OH, Daniel T. Downey, Mark D. Landes, Isaac, Brant, Ledman & Teetor, Columbus, OH, Thomas N. Michaels, Cleveland, OH, for Defendants.
    Thomas Kelley, Armbruster, Kelley, Kot, Honeck & Baker, Akron, OH.
    BATCHELDER, DOWD and POLSTER, District Judges.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Before the Court is the motion to intervene filed by the City of Youngstown pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3626(a)(3)(F). (Doc. No. 207). The motion is granted.

Counsel for the City of Youngstown is directed to file the Complaint in Intervention which was attached to the motion, taking care to use the event “Intervenor’s Complaint” when making this electronic filing.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 
      
      . Counsel should also be sure to file a clean copy, not the one currently attached to the motion, which contains an automatic header labeling it as Doc. No. 207-3. The ECF system will attached a new header once the new document is filed.