Case ID: so2d_813/html/0962-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eduardo VALENZUELA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D00-0816.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Feb. 8, 2002.
    Rehearing Denied April 2, 2002.
    Eduardo Valenzuela, pro se.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and James W. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. The appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) does not affirmatively allege that a prior offense essential to categorize him as a habitual offender does not exist, see Judge v. State, 596 So.2d 73, 78 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), rev. denied, 613 So.2d 5 (Fla.1992), and that the court records will demonstrate a clear entitlement to relief, see Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

BARFIELD, KAHN, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.