Case ID: f-appx_56/html/0616-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kamau KAMBON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAINT AUGUSTINE’S COLLEGE, Defendant-Appellee, and Dianne Suber, Dr.; Beverly Downing, Dr.; Maurice Taylor, Dr., Defendants.
    No. 02-2009.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 24, 2003.
    Decided March 10, 2003.
    Alan McSurely, Ashley Osment, MeSurely & Osment, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellant. Charles T. Francis, Francis & Austin, P.L.L.C., Raleigh, North Carolina; Randall M. Roden, Thar-rington Smith, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    
      Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Kamau Kambon appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Saint Augustine’s College, on his age discrimination claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Kambon v. Saint Augustine’s College, No. CA-00-884-5-BR (E.D.N.C. July 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.