Case ID: so2d_756/html/1107-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jose A. ARREBOLA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D99-2954.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 10, 2000.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, and Ana D’Costa, Certified Legal Intern, for appellant.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Rosa C. Figarola, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.
    Before COPE, GREEN, and SORONDO, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

As we cannot conclude that the challenged remarks made by the state during its closing arguments in this trial were fundamentally erroneous as urged by the appellant, we affirm his conviction and sentence for burglary of an unoccupied structure. See McDonald v. State, 743 So.2d 501 (Fla.1999); Sandoval v. State, 689 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Affirm.