Case ID: sw2d_228/html/0521-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": ". PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte LUCAS.
    No. 24824.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    April 5, 1950.
    See also 211 S.W.2d 222; 216 S.W.2d 820.
    None on appeal for appellant.
    George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.
   . PER CURIAM.

Insofar as the attached petition for the writ of habeas corpus seeks redress because of the failure of the trial court to appoint counsel for relator, in the two cases mentioned, the records of this Court reflect that in one of the cases relator was represented by counsel, while the other is. not of such nature or character as would require the appointment of counsel in order to preserve due process.

Other allegations in the petition attempting to .assert a denial of due process are so vague, indefinite, and uncertain as to be meaningless.

For the reasons stated, the petition for the writ of habeas corpus is, refused.