Case ID: f-appx_386/html/0957-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dario ESPINOSA, a.k.a. D, a.k.a. Dario Espinosa-Alvarez, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-16143
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    July 23, 2010.
    Christopher Nida Patterson, Christopher N. Patterson, P.A., Panama City, FL, for Appellant.
    Nancy J. Hess, United States Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, E. Bryan Wilson, Tallahassee, FL, for Appellee.
    Before EDMONDSON, BIRCH and HILL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Christopher Patterson, appointed counsel for Dario Espinosa in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Espinosa’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.