Case ID: sw3d_545/html/0879-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Aaron NISWONGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 105151
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE.
    Filed: February 6, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 22, 2018 Application for Transfer Denied May 22, 2018
    Matthew J. Bell, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
    Joshua D. Hawley, Atty. Gen., Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
    Before James M. Dowd, C.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and Stanley J. Wallach, Sp.J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM

Aaron Niswonger appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2)&(5).