Case ID: ad2d_268/html/0438-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark Agard, Appellant.
    [701 NYS2d 620]
   —Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin, J.), rendered April 22, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the fight most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Since identification was not an issue in this case, the defendant was not unduly prejudiced by a detective’s accidental testimony that another detective identified the defendant as the individual who accepted the package containing contraband (see, People v Williams, 148 AD2d 480).

The prosecutor’s summation remarks were a fair response to the defendant’s arguments (see, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396). Sullivan, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and H. Miller, JJ., concur.