Case ID: sw3d_560/html/0919-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Scott G. PRATT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 106128
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    Filed: November 13, 2018
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Christian Lehmberg, Woodrail Centre, 1000 W. Nifong, Bldg. 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203.
    ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.
    Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Scott Pratt appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find no clear error in the motion court's denial of his motion and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).