Case ID: f-appx_164/html/0438-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William Fernando BEARD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Dorthy TUELL, Manager; Helen F. Fahey, Chairwoman; David N. Harker; Carol Ann Sievers, Defendants—Appellees, and Department of Corrections; Virginia Parole Board, Defendants.
    No. 05-7476.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 26, 2006.
    Decided: Feb. 3, 2006.
    William Fernando Beard, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Office of The Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

William Fernando Beard appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Beard v. Tuell, No. CA-04-764-2 (E.D.Va. Aug. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED