Case ID: f-appx_381/html/0187-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re: Jamah GROSVENOR, Petitioner.
    No. 09-4383.
    United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
    Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R.App. P. April 30, 2010.
    Opinion filed: May 24, 2010.
    Jamah Grosvenor, Georgetown, DE, pro se.
    Office of Attorney General, Dover, DE, for Defendant-Respondent.
    Before: SCIRICA, WEIS and GARTH, Circuit Judges.
   OPINION

PER CURIAM.

In November 2009, Jamah Grosvenor filed this pro se mandamus petition seeking and directing the District Court to rule upon his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. At the time Grosvenor filed this petition, the District Court had not yet acted on Grosvenor’s motion, which had been pending without activity since March 2007. By order entered on March 1, 2010, 2010 WL 717550, the District Court denied Grosvenor’s motion. Because Grosvenor has now received the relief he sought in filing his mandamus petition — namely, a ruling on his § 2255 motion — we will deny his petition as moot.