Case ID: mo-app_19/html/0037-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Ellison, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John Sinclair, Respondent, v. The City of Bolivar, Appellant.
    Kansas City Court of Appeals,
    October 26, 1885.
    Affirmance. — Upon granting of appeal leave was given to defendant to file bill of exceptions within ten days. It was not filed until after that time and will be disregarded. McCarty v. Cunningham, 75 Mo. 279 ; Taylor v. Newman, 77 Mo. 257. There being no erroi in the record proper the judgment is affirmed.
    Appeal from Polk Circuit Court, Hon. R. W. Fyan, Judge.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    C. W. Hamlin, for the appellant.
    Smith & Krauthoff, with Theo Gf. Rechow, foi the respondent.
   Ellison, J.

This cause on trial below resulted in a judgment for plaintiff. Defendant thereupon prayed an appeal, which was granted December 20, 1882, and by agreement of parties leave was given to defendant to file a bill of exceptions “within ten days.”

The record, however, shows that the bill was not filed until the first day of January 1883. This was not within the terms of the order and under repeated decisions of the supreme court, the bill of exceptions will be disregarded. McCarty v. Cunningham, 75 Mo. 279 ; Taylor v. Newman, 77 Mo. 257.

Perceiving no error in the record proper, we affirm the judgment.

All concur.