Case ID: f-appx_65/html/0496-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael A. DUNCAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor SHERMAN, Jail Dentist, Defendant-Appellee. Michael A. Duncan, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor Sherman, Jail Dentist, Defendant-Appellee.
    Nos. 03-6231, 03-6351.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted May 29, 2003.
    Decided June 4, 2003.
    Michael A. Duncan, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Duncan appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) and denying his motion to amend. We have reviewed the record and find that these appeals are frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. See Duncan v. Sherman, No. CA 02 1869 AM (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 21, 2003 & entered Jan. 22, 2003; filed Feb. 12, 2003 & entered Feb. 13, 2003). We deny Duncan’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.