Case ID: super-ct-jud_1/html/0193-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Pond vers. Medway. ()
    
      (About an Highway.)
    
    On the Return of a Certiorari no Evidence is admissible dehors the Record.
    
      
      (1) In the MS. this cafe is entitled Wrentham S¡ Mednvay. The petitioners were “ John Pond of Wrentham and others.”
    
   RULED, on Argument, unanimously by all the 5 Judges, — That, on a Certiorari, no Evidence should be admitted, but what came up in the Case: () And the Council was not admitted to mention any Fact, but what appeared from the Record.

1765.

The Reason assigned by the Court was, that it would be Injustice to the Sessions to judge on Matters which from the Record returned, did not appear to have been before them. 
      
      (2) S. P. Rutland v. Worcester, 20 Pick. 78. Per Curiam, “ When the record is before the Court upon the return of the writ, the Court will look only at the record.” See 10 Met. 219.