Case ID: colo-app_12/html/0510-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 1849.]
    Owens v. The Town of Montrose.
    Appellate Practice — Abstract op Record — Dismissal.
    Under rule 19 of the court of appeals, appeals aud writs of error will be dismissed where the abstract does not present the parts of the record to which reference is made in the assignment of errors.
    
      Appeal from the District Court of Montrose County.
    
    Mr. John Gray, for appellant.
    Messrs. Black & Catlin and Mr. Henry C. Allen, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Motion to dismiss appeal for failure to abstract the record as required by Rule 16 of this court. Error is assigned to a judgment alleged to have been rendered. The rendition of the supposed judgment is the principal error alleged, and the only one of any importance. It does not appear from the abstract on file that any judgment was ever rendered. Our Rule 19 provides for the dismissal of appeals and writs of error in cases where the abstract does not present the parts of the record to which reference is made in the assignment of errors. This abstract is also insufficient in other respects.

The appeal will be dismissed. •

Dismissed.