Case ID: ad_279/html/0598-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Juanita Baynes et al., Respondents, v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
   It is our opinion that this record presented a question of fact upon the control of the area and the duty to maintain it, which should have been submitted to the jury and not determined by the court; and that it was error to charge the jury that they should not consider the lease and to charge that it was appellant’s duty to maintain the area in a reasonably safe condition. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.