Case ID: ohio-st-3d_68/html/0005-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dayton Bar Association v. Lewis.
    [Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Lewis (1993), 68 Ohio St.3d 5.]
    (No. 93-1330
    Submitted September 22, 1993
    Decided December 8, 1993.)
    
      
      Dennis A. Lieberman, for relator.
    
      Robert E. Renshaw, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s findings of fact and adopt its recommendation of a two-year suspension. However, we order that the entire suspension be stayed pending respondent’s successful completion of a two-year probationary period under the conditions recommended by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., dissents and would order a two-year suspension with eighteen months stayed.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents and would order a one-year suspension with six months stayed.