Case ID: ny-st-rep_70/html/0733-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Conlan, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James Farrell, Resp’t, v. Roger Harrison, App’lt.
    
      (New York City Court, General Term,
    
    
      Filed November 26, 1895.)
    
    Husband and wipe—Earnings op wife.
    Where husband and wife live together, and the wife keeps boarders in the house where they are living, the husband is entitled to ihe money paid for board, unless a special agreement is shown between them, allowing the wife to have that claim for her sole property.
    Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff, entered on a verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
    
      Mulqueen & Mulqueen, for app’lt; August P Wagener, for resp’t.
   Conlan, J.

Appeal from a judgment entered on the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. This action was brought to recover for moneys claimed to have been converted by the defendant. The answer denies the complaint, and sets up a counterclaim for board and lodging furnished toplaintiS between August, 1894, and March, 1895. The evidence shows that the defendant was a married man during the period aforesaid, and tended to show that he kept house, and that the plaintiff lived in the family, and that his board and lodging was worth three dollars per week. At the close of this case, defendant’s counsel asked the court to charge that where husband and wife lived together, and the wife kept boarders, and the boarders are kept in the house, the husband is entitled to the money paid for board, unless a special agreement is shown between the husband and wife, allowing the wife to have that claim for her sole property. The court refused to charge as requested, and defendant’s counsel duly excepted. We think this was error. The defendant was entitled to have the proposition charged as requested, and we cannot say that the refusal did not prejudice the defendant.

Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.