Case ID: njl_129/html/0100-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHRIS SPICCIA, RESPONDENT, v. PATERSON SILK THROWING CO., INC., APPELLANT.
    Argued May 19, 1942
    Decided September 18, 1942.
    For the respondent, Hymen D. Goldberg.
    
    For the appellant, Herman Shapiro.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons' expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 12.

For reversal—None.