Case ID: so2d_624/html/0817-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bernie A. FAIRCHILD, Appellant, v. Jamie M. FAIRCHILD, Appellee.
    No. 92-2615.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Sept. 29, 1993.
    Robert A. Stok of Gest & Stok, P.A., Miami, for appellant.
    Val L. Osinski of Law Offices of Val L. Osinski, Coral Springs, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm all issues except the order holding appellant in contempt, which must be reversed because the trial court did not make a finding that he had the ability to pay the purge amount. Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla.1985); Knowles v. Knowles, 522 So.2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Reversed.

GUNTHER, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.