Case ID: so2d_919/html/0671-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jorge ROQUE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 5D05-1303.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Jan. 27, 2006.
    James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
    No Appearance for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Cummings-El v. State, 863 So.2d 246, 254-55 (Fla.2003) (stating “as a practical matter, the trial judge’s inquiry can only be as specific as the defendant’s complaint[;] ... a trial court does not err in failing to conduct a Nelson inquiry where the defendant merely expresses dissatisfaction with this attorney).”

GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.