Case ID: so2d_289/html/0711-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The CITIZENS & PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK OF PENSACOLA, etc., Petitioner, v. Lennie Elizabeth PATE, Respondent.
    No. 43742.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Dec. 20, 1973.
    Rehearing Denied March 8, 1974.
    Joe J. Harrell and Donald H. Parting-ton, Harrell, Wiltshire, Bozeman, Clark & Stone, Pensacola, for petitioner.
    Charles L. Cetti and Artice L. McGraw, Phillips, Williams, McGraw, Cetti & O’Brien, Pensacola, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

CARLTON, C. J., and McCAIN and DEKLE, JT., dissent.