Case ID: ad2d_115/html/0982-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jakob S. Schaechter, Respondent, v Regency Properties, Inc., Doing Business as Regency Properties-Better Homes and Gardens, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff. Ben Di Fiore et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.
    (Appeal No. 2.)
   Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, without costs. Same memorandum as in Schaechter v Regency Props. ([Appeal No. 1], 115 AD2d 981). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Pine, J.—real estate commissions.) Present—Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.