Case ID: sw3d_485/html/0779-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marcia J. GARLAND, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. AFT ST. LOUIS LOCAL 420, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. ED 103187
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE.
    
    Filed: April 5, 2016
    Douglas B. Ponder, Jaclyn M. Zimmerman, 20 S. Sarah Street, St. Louis, MO 63108, for Plaintiff/Appellant.
    George O. Suggs, 1221 Locust Street, 2nd Floor, St. Louis, MO 63103, for Defendant/Respondent.
    Before Lisa S. Van Amburg, C.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and Sherri B. Sullivan, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Marcia J. Garland (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of AFT St. Louis Local 420 on Appellant’s Petition alleging discrimination under the Missouri Human Rights Act. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not err in refusing to submit Appellant’s proffered verdict director as it amounted to an impermissible roving commission. Klotz v. St. Anthony’s Med. Ctr., 311 S.W.3d 752, 766 (Mo.2010), as modified (May 25, 2010). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).