Case ID: ohio-st-3d_106/html/0040-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State ex rel. Bryson, Appellant, v. GAC Merchandising, Inc. et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as State ex rel. Bryson v. GAC Merchandising, Inc., 106 Ohio St.3d 40, 2005-Ohio-3556.]
    (No. 2004-1435
    — Submitted May 10, 2005
    — Decided July 27, 2005.)
    Mark R. Naegel, for appellant.
    Jim Petro, Attorney General, and William J. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.
   {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Resnick and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.