Case ID: cust-ct_3/html/0361-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 41993.
    Protest 105406-G of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United Slates v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) and United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809) Normandy laces, embroidered cotton curtains, and embroidered silk veilings were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Merchandise in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those the subject of Abstract 38230 was held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31.