Case ID: cust-ct_2/html/0757-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 41629.
    Protests 10249-G, etc., of Stern Bros. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel Normandy lace articles, embroidered cushions, sachets, doilies, and net handkerchiefs were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed. United States v. Amrein Freudenberg (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396), and United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809) followed.