Case ID: nys_16/html/0958-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kane, Respondent, v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co. et al., Appellants.
    (No. 2.)
    
      (Superior Court of New York City, General Term.
    
    December 17, 1891.)
    Appeal from special term.
    Action by Edith Kane against the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company .and another. For former reports, see 6 N. Y. Supp. 526; 7 N. Y. Supp. 653.
    
      Argued before McAdam and Gildersleeve, JJ.
    
      Davies & Rapallo, for appellants. J. A. Weeks, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We have carefully examined the record. The findings were intelligently passed upon according to prevailing practice, and we have failed to discover any error in the rulings which requires a new trial. Judgment affirmed, with costs.