Case ID: ad3d_56/html/1179-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mead Home Improvement, Inc., Respondent, v Jeanette Goldstein, Appellant.
    [866 NYS2d 889]
   — Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (Richard A. Keenan, J.), entered April 3, 2007. The order affirmed a judgment of the Rochester City Court (Teresa D. Johnson, J.), dated September 21, 2006 in favor of plaintiff in a small claims action.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order affirming City Court’s judgment in favor of plaintiff in this small claims action. Contrary to defendant’s contention, we conclude that “substantial justice has . . . been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law,” and thus we affirm (UJCA 1807; see generally Sten v Desrocher, 8 AD3d 915 [2004]; Coppola v Kandey Co., 236 AD2d 871 [1997]). Present — Martoche, J.P, Smith, Centra, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.