Case ID: sw3d_530/html/0613-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURlAJVf.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Elton NEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    ED 105261
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    Filed: October 17, 2017
    Randall G. Brachman, Assistant Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
    Robert J. Bartholomew, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
    Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
   ORDER

PER CURlAJVf.

.Elton Neal (“Movant”) appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.036 post-conviction relief motion. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial .court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).