Case ID: ala_225/html/0558-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

144 So. 461
    E. L. GATLIN v. STARR PIANO CO.
    4 Div. 661.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Nov. 10, 1932.
    E. O. Baldwin, of Andalusia, for petitioner.
    A. Whaley, of Andalusia, opposed
   PER CURIAM.

On the authority of Simpson v. State, 214 Ala. 176, 106 So. 898; Messer v. State, 221 Ala. 379, 129 So. 97; Ballard v. State, 219 Ala. 222, 121 So. 502, and Hardy v. First National Bank, 219 Ala. 435, 122 So. 702, we cannot review the opinion of the Court of Appeals on the point argued by petitioner.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.