Case ID: ga-app_8/html/0380-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Hill, O. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

2843, 2844.
    Moulton v. The State (two cases).
    Decided October 14, 1910.
    Indictment for simple larceny; from Early superior court— Judge Worrill. June 17, 1910.
    
      Hawes & Pottle, for plaintiff in error.
    
      J. A. Laing, solicitor-general, Reuben R. Arnold, contra.
   Hill, O. J.

No error of law appears. The evidence of guilt was weak and unsatisfactory, but there were some circumstances from which the jury might reasonably have inferred guilt, and these circumstances were not satisfactorily explained by the defendant. The verdict was approved by the trial judge, and this court can not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.