Case ID: cust-ct_3/html/0401-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 42217.
    Protests 290295-G, etc., of Saks & Co. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the .authority of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) and Abstract 12951 embroidered laces and embroidered wearing apparel were held dutiable at "75 percent under paragraph 1430. Artificial flowers like those the subject of Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.