Case ID: f-appx_204/html/0029-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Larry RUTHER, Appellant v. M.J. MAKANDA, Appellee.
    No. 06-7097.
    United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
    Oct. 19, 2006.
    Larry Ruther, Manassas, VA, pro se.
    Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed May 8, 2006, and May 25, 2006, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration of that order.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.