Case ID: ad_224/html/0874-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James E. Hanley, Appellant, v. James B. Price, Respondent.
   Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the question of defendant’s negligence was for the jury; that there was evidence sufficient to require the submission of the question to the jury. We are not now passing upon the question whether a verdict for plaintiff would have been against the weight of the evidence, as we did in the ease of Froehlich v. Trevor (219 App. Div. 863). All concur. Present — Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Sears, Crouch and Sawyer, JJ.