Case ID: us_203/html/0583-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 93.
    Katie Moeschen, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Tenement House Department of the City of New York.
    Argued November 9, 1906.
    Decided November 12, 1906.
   In error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs. Boston Beer Company v. Massachusetts, 97 U. S. 25, 32; Powell v. Pennsylvania, 127 U. S. 678; United States v. Des Moines &c. Company, 142 U. S. 510, 544; Holden v. Hardy, 169 U. S. 366; Atkin v. Kansas, 191 U. S. 207; Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U. S. 11; Gardner v. Michigan, 199 U. S. 325; case below, 89 App. Div. 526; 179 N. Y. 325. And see Health Department v. Rector &c., 145 N. Y. 32; Harrington v. Board of Aldermen, 20 R. I. 233; Commonwealth v. Roberts, 155 Massachusetts, 281.

Mr. Adolph Bloch for plaintiff in error. Mr. Theodore Connoly for defendant in error.