Case ID: ga-app_43/html/0343-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

21403.
    Cordell v. The State.
    Decided May 13, 1931.
    
      B. B. Neal, Porter & Mebane, for plaintiff in error.
    
      M. Neil Andreius, solicitor-general, Bean Owens, Horace B. Shat-tuck, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

1. There is no error in the instructions given the jury and of which complaint is made in the motion for a new trial, when the excerpt quoted is read in connection with the entire charge.

Z. There is some evidence to support the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and hulee, J., concur.