Case ID: f2d_454/html/1174-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. James Allen DE CLUE, Jr., Appellant.
    No. 71-1648.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Feb. 17, 1972.
    Donald B. Marks, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
    Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., Eric A. Nobles, Chief, Criminal Division, Barry Russell, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
    Before KOELSCH, ELY and TRASK, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

De Clue pleaded guilty to the offense of bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). He appeals from the judgment of conviction, contending (1) that the sentence imposed by the district judge was unduly harsh, (2) that the assistance rendered to him by his trial counsel was ineffective.

Neither of De Clue’s contentions has any merit whatsoever. Accordingly, the judgment is

Affirmed.