Case ID: so2d_595/html/0586-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James BEHAN, Appellant, v. Judith A. BEHAN, Appellee.
    No. 91-00565.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 27, 1992.
    Ann Loughridge Kerr, Clearwater, and Law Offices of Elser, Greene & Hodor, Miami, for appellant.
    
      Carl T. Boake of Wallace, Finck & Boake, St. Petersburg, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We base this affirmance upon our conclusion that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in imputing to Mr. Behan the ability to achieve an income of $120,000 per year, which would satisfy the obligations imposed by the trial court in its final judgment. See Scapin v. Scapin, 547 So.2d 1012 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBÉRND, JJ., concur.