Case ID: nys_28/html/0169-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BOWMAN, THOMPSON & CO., Limited, v. FUERST et al.
    (No. 51.)
    (Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.
    March 16, 1894.)
    Appeal from special term, New York county.
    Action by Bowman, Thompson & Co., Limited, against Joseph F. Fuerst, Albert F. Fuerst, and Jules Fuerst. From an order denying a motion to-vacate an order of arrest, defendants appeal. Affirmed.
    Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and O’BRIEN and FOLLETT, JJ.
    I. M. Dittenhoefer, for appellants.
    James Dunne, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

For the reasons expressed in the case of Bowman, Thompson & Co. v. Fuerst (herewith handed down) 28 N. Y, Supp. 168, the order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.