Case ID: fla_111/html/0829-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Doris Courtney v. L. M. Courtney.
    150 So. 137.
    (See 108 Fla. 276, 146 So. 229-.)
    Division B.
    Decision Filed September 18, 1933.
    
      Wallace Tervin, for Appellant.
    
      
      Grimes & Rowe, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree.herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by this Court that the decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Bufórd, J. J., concur.