Case ID: nys_149/html/1110-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SCHOR, Respondent, v. BRISKMAN Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    October 16, 1914.)
    Action by William Sober against Isaac Briskman.
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment entered in this action, dismissing the complaint of the plaintiff, was a final determination against the right of the plaintiff to an injunction, even though it was entered on plaintiff's default. There is no claim that it has been vacated, so its finality stands unquestioned at this moment. Therefore the defendant was entitled to the relief for which he moved, and the deninl of the same by the learned Special Term was erroneous. The order is reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion of the appellant is granted, with $10 costs.