Case ID: so2d_773/html/1229-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jacqueline SOLOMON, Appellant, v. Ronald SOLOMON, Appellee.
    No. 3D00-1584.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 13, 2000.
    Greenspoon, Marder, Hirshfeld, Rafkin, Ross & Berger and Richard W. Epstein, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    Frederick C. Sake, Miami Beach, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and SHEVIN and SORONDO, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order insofar as it correctly ruled that Jacqueline Solomon is not entitled to a second judgment against debtor Ronald Solomon based on the same $500,000 obligation. However, this affirmance is without prejudice to Jacqueline Solomon’s right to proceed against mortgagor Mortimer Solomon to foreclose on the mortgage based on Ronald Solomon’s failure to remit payments pursuant to the promissory note.

Affirmed.