Case ID: sw3d_411/html/0867-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CITIBANK, N.A., Respondent, v. Chris CACIOPPO, Appellant.
    No. WD 75927.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Oct. 22, 2013.
    Michael H. Berman and J. Brock Row-att, Kansas City, MO, for respondent.
    James L. Baker and Bruce E. Strauss, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
    Before Division Three: KAREN KING MITCHELL, Presiding Judge, and LISA WHITE HARDWICK and GARY D. WITT, Judges.
   Order

PER CURIAM:

Chris Cacioppo appeals the trial court’s judgment entered in favor of CitiBank, N.A., on its claims for breach of contract and account stated, resulting from defaulted credit obligations on a business credit account issued by CitiBank in Cacioppo’s name. Cacioppo argues that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by substantial evidence insofar as there was no evidence that Cacioppo, rather than Tera-source (the business he worked for), was the account holder and therefore primarily responsible for complying with the terms of the credit agreement. Because the evidence and reasonable inferences derived therefrom support the trial court’s judgment, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).