Case ID: so2d_181/html/0018-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "CARROLL, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lillian PORTERFIELD, James W. Heistand and Malcolm L. Botsford, Appellants, v. C. B. PORTERFIELD, individually and for the Use and Benefit of Miami Metal, Inc., and Alloyed Metals, Inc., Miami Metal, Inc., and Alloyed Metals, Inc., Appellees.
    No. 65-760.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    Dec. 7, 1965.
    Guilmartin & Bartel, William W. Charles, Jepéway & Gassen, Joe N. Unger, Miami, for appellants.
    
      Anderson & Nadeau, Miami, for appel-lees.
    Before HENDRY, C. J., and CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.
   CARROLL, Judge.

This appeal challenges appointment of a receiver. Our opinion and judgment filed this date on the appeal from the final decree (Appeal No. 65-440, 181 So.2d 16) and our order of September 9, 1965, entered in this appeal (No. 65-760), which stayed and in effect set aside the appointment of the receiver, appear determinative of the subject matter of this appeal, making ruling herein unnecessary.

It is so ordered.