Case ID: cust-ct_18/html/0317-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Cole, Judge (Abstract):", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rogers Peet Co. v. United States
    No. 6771.
    Entry No. 703377, etc.
    Invoices dated Edinburgh, Scotland, June 11, 1941, etc.
    Certified June 12, 1941, etc.
    Entered at New York, N. Y., July 15, 1941, etc.
    (Decided January 17, 1947)
    
      Lane & Wallace and Lane, Young & Fox for the plaintiff.
    
      Paul P. Bao, Assistant Attorney Gener’al, for the defendant.
   Cole, Judge (Abstract):

These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (e)). United States v. Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp., 33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

The cited case was incorporated herein by consent of the parties who further agree on a set of facts, embodied in a written stipulation submitting the present eases, showing export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. §1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values are the appraised values of the articles in question, less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances in similar cases.