Case ID: ala-app_23/html/0644-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BRICKEN, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(127 So. 922)
    Bill JAMES v. STATE.
    7 Div. 586.
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    March 4, 1930.
    See, also, ante, p. 119, 121 So. 690.
    C. A. Wolfes, of Ft. Payne, for appellant.
    Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.
   BRICKEN, P. J.

The point of decision involved upon this appeal is the action of the court in overruling defendant’s motion for a new trial. We discover no error in this connection. The evidence tended to show that this appellant was in possession óf a fruit can or jar of corn whisky. He testified he was not. This conflict in the evidence made a jury question. We think the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict of the jury.

Affirmed.