Case ID: f-appx_356/html/0374-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HIF BIO, INC. and Bizbiotech Co., Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. YUNG SHIN PHARMACEUTICALS INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD. (doing business as Yung Shin Pharmaceuticals and Yung Shin Pharm. Ind. Co. Ltd.), Yung Zip Chemical Co., Ltd., Fang-Yu Lee, and Che-Ming Teng, Defendants, and Carlsbad Technology, Inc., Defendant-Appellant, and Fish and Richardson P.C., and Y. Rocky Tsao, Defendants.
    No. 2006-1522.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    June 18, 2009.
    
      Bub-Joo S. Lee, Lee Anav Chung, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
    Glenn W. Rhodes, Howrey LLP, San Francisco, CA, Stephanie M. Byerly, Julie S. Gabler, Jesse D. Mulholland, Howrey LLP, Irvine, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, GAJARSA, Circuit Judge, and HOLDERMAN, Chief District Judge.
    
    
      
       Honorable James F. Holderman, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, sitting by designation.
    
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The court has received a certified copy of the judgment from the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States in Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc., 556 U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1862, 173 L.Ed.2d 848 (2009).

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The mandate issued on February 15, 2008, is hereby recalled and the appeal is reinstated.

(2) The case is returned for consideration to the original merits panel.

(3) The Supreme Court reversed the judgment of this court and remanded the case to this court to conduct further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Appellant filed a motion for submission of supplemental briefings and oral argument. The motion is granted to the extent noted below:

(a)Appellant’s initial supplemental brief is due 20 days from the date of filing of this order;
(b) Appellees’ responsive supplemental brief is due 20 days after service of Appellant’s initial supplemental brief;
(c) Appellant’s reply brief is due 10 days from service of Appellees’ responsive initial supplemental brief; and
(d) The two initial briefs are limited to 20 pages and the final reply is limited to 10 pages and in all other respects shall be in accordance with the Court’s rules.

(4)Oral argument may be scheduled if it is deemed necessary.