Case ID: so2d_728/html/1224-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carlos HUDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 97-4728.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    April 6, 1999.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Kathleen Stover, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Denise 0. Simpson, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, appellant raises two sentencing errors: (1) that the judgment incorrectly reflects that aggravated assault is a second-degree, rather than a third-degree, felony, and that attempted armed robbery is a first-degree, rather than a second-degree, felony; and (2) that 18 points were erroneously assessed on the guidelines scoresheet for possession of a firearm. As the state correctly points out, neither issue was preserved, and neither would amount to fundamental error. Accordingly, we affirm. § 924.051(3), Fla. Stat. (1997). See, e.g., Seccia v. State, 720 So.2d 580 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), review granted, 727 So.2d 910 (Fla.1999); West v. State, 718 So.2d 908 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Neal v. State, 688 So.2d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, JOANOS and WEBSTER, JJ., CONCUR.