Case ID: so2d_507/html/0740-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HALL, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David COX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 86-1873.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    May 20, 1987.
    
      James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and D.P. Chanco, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Erica M. Raffel, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   HALL, Judge.

Appellant David Cox appeals his judgment and sentence for resisting a law enforcement officer with force. Appellant raises several issues in this appeal, but we find merit only in his contention that the trial court erred in departing from the sentencing guidelines when imposing sentence upon him.

The trial court wrote as its sole reason for departure that appellant had been classified as a habitual offender. Habitual offender status is an invalid reason for departure from the sentencing guidelines. Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla. 1986).

Accordingly, this case is remanded for resentencing within the guidelines. Affirmed in all other respects.

RYDER, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.