Case ID: f-appx_648/html/0324-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Barry NAKELL, Respondent-Appellant, v. John M. BARTH, Sr., Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 15-1906.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 29, 2016.
    Decided: May 11, 2016.
    Amended: July 19, 2016.
    
      Matthew Nis Leerberg, Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Michael J. Small, David B. Goroff, Licyau Wong, Foley & Lardner LLP, Chicago, Illinois; Reginald B. Gillespie, Jr., N. Hunter Wyche, Jr., Wilson & Ratledge, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Barry Nakell appeals the district court’s order assessing fees and costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927 (2012), against him for unreasonably multiplying the proceedings in an action in a bankruptcy case. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nakell v. Barth, No. 5:14-cv-00236-F (E.D.N.C. July 10, 2015). We grant Barth’s motion to submit the case on the briefs and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.