Case ID: ny-super-ct_61/html/0463-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Clark R. Griggs, Respondent v. Melville C. Day, et al., as Surviving Executors, etc., Appellants.
    Decided May 2, 1892.
    Appeal by defendants from order denying motion to strike from the judgment roll plaintiff’s proposed findings of fact and conclusions of the of the referee been in the iff’s favor.
    William R. Bronk, for appellants. John McDonald, for respondent.
    Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., and McAdam, J. The court found that defendants’ attorney had assented to.the incorporation in the judgment roll of said proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.
   Per Curiam.

Order affirmed, with costs.