Case ID: so2d_199/html/0501-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles Donald GALLAGHER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 66-690, 66-691, 66-692 and 66-697.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    May 31, 1967.
    Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender and Robert D. Josefsberg, Special Asst. Public Defender and Marvin J. Emory, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
    Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Herbert P. Benn, Arden M. Siegendorf and Jesse J. McCrary, Asst. Attys. Gen., for ap-pellee.
    Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The only substantial question presented on this appeal from four convictions for uttering forged instruments is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a continuance of trial. The motion was made at the time the cause was called for trial. The only basis for continuance advanced was appellant’s wish to have a longer time to make restitution. The court had previously granted a continuance for the same purpose.

Error has not been demonstrated. See Vitiello v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 629, 631.

Affirmed.