Case ID: f-appx_155/html/0693-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harold W. FOSTER, Plaintiff—Appellant, and Phillip Turpen; Michael Simmons, Plaintiffs, v. Theodis BECK; Willard Jobe; Sandra Pitman; Jack Louder; Utilization Review Board, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 05-7159.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 17, 2005.
    Decided: Nov. 29, 2005.
    Harold W. Foster, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Harold W. Foster appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Foster v. Beck, No. CA-05-232-03-MU-1 (W.D.N.C. filed July 7, 2005 & entered July 8, 2005). We deny Foster’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED