Case ID: nys_69/html/1134-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FINCK, Appellant, v. BAKER, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    April 8, 1901.)
    Action by John Finck against HymanD. Baker. From a judgment of the New York municipal court in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals.
    Affirmed.
    William H. Bronk, for appellant. '
    Kantrowitz & Esberg, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The record does not present a case .justifying a review of the evidence under section 3063 of the Code. On a straightforward conflict of fact, the justice below has given credence to the defendant’s story. His decision should stand. Judgment affirmed, with •costs.