Case ID: f-appx_286/html/0843-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Martin Moreno RUIZ, Plaintiff-Appellant v. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF the MEXICAN REPUBLIC; Mexican Army Department of Infantry 35 Regiment; Osvaldo Bejar Armendariz; Mayor Cordero; Joe Doe 1; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 07-51312
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    April 14, 2008.
    Martin Moreno Ruiz, U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service Processing Center, El Paso, TX, pro se.
    Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Martin Moreno Ruiz, alien detainee # [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. The district court denied Ruiz’s IFP motion and certified that the appeal was not taken in good faith. By moving for IFP status, Ruiz is challenging the district court’s certification. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir.1997).

Aside from conclusional allegations, Ruiz does not challenge the district court’s determination that he failed to present an arguable or non-frivolous issue for appeal. Further, aside from conclusional allegations that his complaint was filed under the Alien Tort Claims Act, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Mexican Military Justice Code, the United Nations Charter, and Article VI of the United States Constitution, Ruiz does not address the district court’s determination that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over his claims. Ruiz’s attempt to incorporate by reference the arguments set forth in his notice of appeal is an insufficient means of raising those arguments in this court. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir.1993). Therefore, these issues are deemed abandoned. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir.1987).

Ruiz has not shown that the district court’s certification was incorrect. The instant appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. Accordingly, Ruiz’s request for IFP status is denied, and his appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Ruiz’s motions for a temporary restraining order (stay of deportation), a transfer or relocation to another facility, and a picture of the district court judge are also denied.

MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.