Case ID: ga-app_34/html/0785-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodwoeth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

16979.
    Howard v. The State.
    Decided January 13, 1926.
    Conviction of manslaughter; from Fulton superior court—Judge Howard. October 3, 1925.
    
      Branch & Howard', J. W. LeCraw, Shackelford & Shackelford, for plaintiff in error.
    
      John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, Ralph H. Pharr, contra.
   Bloodwoeth, J.

In view of the evidence and the statement of the defendant, and of the entire charge of the court, there is no such material error in any of the excerpts from the charge complained of in the motion for a new trial as requires a reversal of the judgment.

The verdict of voluntary manslaughter was not without evidence to support it.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luhe, J., concur.