Case ID: misc2d_61/html/1019-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Hiram Deeks, Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    December 12, 1969.
    
      
      David B. Siegal send. Jay Martin Siegal for appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The requirement of the ordinance that 100% of the residents living within 200 feet of the 1 ‘ outer extremities of applicant’s property ” must consent to the proposed use was an unconstitutional grant of power, since the capricious exercise of a negative vote by one resident could defeat the application.

The order and judgment dismissing information should be unanimously affirmed.

Concur — Hogan, P. J., Gulotta and Glickman, JJ.

Order and judgment affirmed.