Case ID: cole-cai-cas_1/html/0466-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Garrit Bogert v. David Bancroft.
    
    WILLIAMS moved in this cause, on a notice signed by himself, “ for A. B,” the attorney.
    
      W. P. Van Ness
    
    excepted to the signature, as not being that of the attorney himself.
    
      
      Williams in reply. 1 *
    He is in embarrassed circumstances, and could not be found. But independent of this, the signature is sufficient. Stipulations signed by counsel alone, have been held good : so his subscription to a case made at a circuit, is sufficient.
    
      
      
        Wilcox v. Woodhull.
      
    
   Per Curiam.

Under the circumstances of this case, we think the signature sufficient, But we do not by this mean to say, that subjoining the name of a counsel in the cause, is, in these incidental proceedings, adequate to that of the attorney. We rather think it is not.