Case ID: mich_123/html/0695-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JAHN v. FAHEY.
    
    Appeal — Evidence—Foreclosure of Mortgage — Forged Signature.
    A decree of foreclosure, rendered on conflicting evidence as to whether the purported signature of defendant to the mortgage in suit was a forgery, was affirmed.
    Appeal from Wayne; Waite, J.
    Submitted April 11, 1900.
    Decided April 24, 1900.
    Bill by Julius Jahn, Jr., against Sarah J. Fahey, to foreclose a mortgage. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      William E. Walsh, for complainant.
    
      Jonathan Palmer, Jr. (Fred M. Aldrich, of counsel), for defendant.
    
      
       Rehearing denied June 18, 1900.
    
   Per Curiam.

This is. a bill to foreclose a mortgage executed by the defendant. The sole defense is that the mortgage and note were forged. The court below entered a decree for the complainant. The testimony was in direct conflict. A discussion of it would be unprofitable. We think the court below reached the correct conclusion.

Decree affirmed, with costs.