Case ID: ad_279/html/0912-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Giardino Corporation et al., Respondents, v. J. Harry Goldblatt, Appellant.
   Although the granting of the motion did not impinge upon the constitutional right to a trial by jury (Steck v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co., 142 N. Y. 236; 4 Carmody on New York Practice, p. 2692, and cases cited) the record did not warrant the granting of a compulsory order of reference on the ground that the examination of a long account was necessary within the meaning of section 466 of the Civil Practice Act, under long-settled authority. (Davidson v. Sterngass, 279 App. Div. 875, and cases cited therein; Untermyer v. Beinhauer, 105 N. Y. 521.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.