Case ID: f-appx_247/html/0066-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. German XINGU-GUTIERREZ, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 06-30216.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 13, 2007.
    
    Filed Aug. 22, 2007.
    Helen J. Brunner, Esq., Annette L. Hayes, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    William T. Hines, Esq., Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

German Xingu-Gutierrez appeals from the 23-month and one-week sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for unlawful entry by eluding examination and inspection by immigration officers, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Xingu-Gutierrez contends that the district court erred by not articulating on the record its consideration of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Because the record reflects that Xingu-Gutierrez and the government agreed upon a proposed sentence, and the district court set forth “a reasoned basis” for the sentence, we conclude that the district court did not err. See Rita v. United States, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2468, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.