Case ID: misc_14/html/0650-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "McCarthy, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CITY COURT OF NEW YORK
    GENERAL TERM,
    OCTOBER, 1895.
    Bernhard McLain, Respondent, v. The British & Foreign Marine Insurance Co., Limited, Appellant.
    , Appeal from judgment in fa-vor of plaintiff entered upon, verdict.
    
      Stewart c& Mdcklin, for appellant. ■
    
      Mylcmd c& Zabrishie, for respondent.
   McCarthy, J.

We have given this case very careful study,, and thjnk that the various objections claimed by the appellant have been inet, and the case was correctly submitted to the jury.

The " complaint was proper in form, -and sufficiently complied with claim of appellant. Code (hv- Pfioc. § 533.

The authority cited by appellant as controlling this case, to-wit, Van Wickle v. Mech. & Traders' Ins. Co., 97 N. Y. 350, 353, is distinguished in the case of Singleton v. Phœnix Ins. Co., 132 id. 298, 303, 304, and in our ‘ judgment meets this-case. ■ .-.

We find no errors, and the judgment must be affirmed, with costs. ■ ’

Van Wygk, J., concurs. . ) .

- Judgment. affirmed, with costs. ■