Case ID: f-appx_201/html/0538-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. John A. McKNIGHT, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 06-30244.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 11, 2006.
    
    Filed Sept. 14, 2006.
    Joshua A. Van De Wetering, Esq., Missoula, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    John P. Rhodes, Esq., Missoula, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
    
      Before: PREGERSON, T.G. NELSON, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

John McKnight appeals the sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. He contends that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment rights in imposing a prison term on the basis of facts neither admitted nor proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. As McKnight concedes, this contention is foreclosed by United States v. Huerta-Pimental, 445 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir. 2006). We therefore affirm his sentence.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.