Case ID: cow_6/html/0041-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      The Court\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anonymous.
    On motion that an argument take preference on the calendar ;
    
    pol^cjsu^a°“^ an incorporated insurance company, not entitled to ^j®fence,llle statute, (sess. 48 fXj Z”5 $ 4 jc ' ’
   The Court

, _ . ,. r . decided that a suit upon a policy ot msur-anee against an incorporated insurance company, was not entitled to preference within the 4th section of the “ Act x to prevent fraudulent bankruptcies by incorporated companies,” &c. passed April 21, 1825, (sess. 48, ch. 325;) a policy not being a contract, note or other evidence of debt, within the meaning of the statute. They said it meant some instrument which is, in itself, evidence of debt; as a note, bill of exchange or bond, 8tc.