Case ID: nj-misc_9/html/1118-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Ctjeiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MYRTIE C. VAN KEUREN, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM, PLAINTIFF, v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
    Argued October 6, 1931
    Decided November 9, 1931.
    Before Justices Tbenchaed, Daly and Donges.
    Eor the application, Hobart & Minard.
    
    
      Contra, Alexander Simpson.
    
   Pee Ctjeiam.

Plaintiff has a verdict and defendants seek a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside and a new trial granted.

Upon consideration of the matters presented, we conclude that the application for a rule to show cause should be denied.

The application is denied, with costs.