Case ID: so2d_611/html/0115-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kenneth R. CRAVEN, Appellant, v. SUN BANK, N.A., and J. Albert Burnett, Appellees.
    No. 91-2506.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Jan. 22, 1993.
    Stephen J. Calvácca of Stephen J. Calvac-ca, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.
    Darryl M. Bloodworth and Renee A. Roche of Dean, Mead, Egerton, Blood-worth, Capouano & Bozarth, P.A., Orlando, for appellee Sun Bank.
    William B. Wilson of Maguire, Voorhis & Wells, P.A., Orlando, for appellee J. Albert Burnett.
   PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in appellant’s contentions on appeal except that appellant, individually, was entitled to assert a claim against appellee, Burnett, for fraud. Nevertheless, based on our review of the record, including appellant’s own extensive deposition testimony, we conclude the lower court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Burnett on the fraud claim was correct.

AFFIRMED.

COBB, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.