Case ID: ad_247/html/0786-10.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rose Nicoletti and Anthony Nicoletti, Appellants, v. Union Railway Company of New York City, Respondent.
    (Appeal No. 2.)
   Defendant moved at Special Term for an order dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiffs had not complied with an ex parte order requiring them to furnish security for costs. Said motion was granted, and judgment entered. Judgment and order granting motion to dismiss complaint reversed, without costs, and motion denied. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.