Case ID: so2d_561/html/0123-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE ex rel. Earl DUPAR v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 90-KH-1073.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    May 22, 1990.
   In re Dupar, Earl; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “A”, No. 255-248.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post-conviction relief he claims to have filed on or about December 19, 1989. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon relator’s application which is herewith transferred to the district court.