Case ID: so2d_556/html/0747-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lucretia KENNEDY, Appellant, v. AESTHETECH CORPORATION, Appellee. AESTHETECH CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Lucretia KENNEDY, Appellee. NORTH SHORE MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Appellant, v. Lucretia KENNEDY, Appellee.
    Nos. 88-545, 88-605, 88-689, and 88-1072.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 25, 1988.
    James C. Blecke, Miami, for appellant.
    Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Tutan, O’Hara, McCoy, Graham & Lane and Shelley H. Leinicke, Fort Lauderdale, Stephens, Lynn, Klein & McNicholas and Robert Klein, Miami, for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.
   ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of arguments by counsel, we deny appellant Kennedy’s motion for rehearing, dismiss all pending appeals brought by Kennedy, and reverse the order granting a new trial on damages. We remand for entry of a final judgment in accordance with the remittitur. Because we reverse the order granting a new trial, we dismiss the appeals filed by Aesthe-tech and North Shore without prejudice to their appealing upon entry of the final judgment. 
      
      . Aesthetech Corp. v. Kennedy, case No. 88-605.
     
      
      . North Shore Medical Center, Inc. v. Kennedy, case Nos. 88-689 & 88-1072.