Case ID: f-appx_596/html/0526-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Pierre WATSON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 14-3265.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 12, 2015.
    Filed: March 17, 2015.
    
      Tracy Berry, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Saint Louis, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Emily Nyman Kaiser, Kaiser & Kaiser, PC, Saint Charles, MO, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Pierre Watson, Forrest City, AR, pro se.
    Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

While Pierre Watson was serving a period of supervised release on a federal criminal sentence, he admitted to the district court that he had violated several release conditions. The court revoked supervised release and imposed a revocation sentence of 8 months in prison and 48 months of additional supervised release. On appeal, Watson contends that the court abused its discretion by failing to articulate its consideration of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-16 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review); United States v. Gray, 533 F.3d 942, 943-44 (8th Cir.2008). The judgment is affirmed. 
      
      . The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.