Case ID: sw3d_2/html/0848-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, ex rel. John STEELE, Timothy Arnold, Lester Sewald, Rick Lemar, Don Lassing, Conrad Aubuchon, Randy Church, Mark Maples and Dennis Self, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. THE CITY OF FESTUS, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. ED 75670.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Sept. 21, 1999.
    Rick Barry, St. Louis, for appellants.
    William C. Dodson & Kurt D. Breeze, Hillsboro, for respondent.
    Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, P.J., KENT E. KAROHL, and MARY K. HOFF. JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs-police officers appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant-city on their action to recover additional wages for work performed.

We have reviewed the record on appeal and find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).