Case ID: sw3d_432/html/0805-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Quintin C. GRAY, Sr., Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 100175.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    June 3, 2014.
    
      Lisa Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Jeff Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before LISA S. VAN AMBURG, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN., J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Quintín C. Gray, Sr., filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. The motion court denied Gray’s motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm the motion court’s denial.

No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).