Case ID: ny_208/html/0626-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The Town of North Hempstead, Respondent, v. Rudolph Oelsner, Appellant.
    
      Town of North Hempstead v. Oelsner, 148 App. Div. 779, affirmed.
    (Argued May 22, 1913;
    decided June 3, 1913.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial • department, entered January 23, 1912, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action of ejectment.
    
      Clarence G. Galston and Arthur Watson for appellant.,
    
      M. Linn Bruce and George B. Stoddard for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that no material question is presented by the record which this court can review. The records, to the receipt of which the appellant objected and excepted, were properly received in evidence. Their construction and effect were submitted to the juiy for its determination without objection to such submission or to the charge of the court on which they were submitted. The unanimous affirmance of the judgment by the Appellate Division precludes us from considering the question of whether the jury properly decided those issues; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett, Chase, Cuddebaoic, Hogan and Miller, JJ.