Case ID: ark_320/html/0392-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Benny REED v. STATE of Arkansas
    CR 95-392
    897 S.W.2d 556
    Supreme Court of Arkansas
    Opinion delivered May 1, 1995
    
      
      John D. Lightfoot, for appellant.
    No response.
   Per Curiam.

Appellant Benny Reed, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed, but neither appellant nor his current attorney, admit fault. As such, the motion for rule on the clerk does not state good cause for granting the motion as discussed in our per curiam issued February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964. If appellant’s current attorney, John D. Lightfoot, will concede by affidavit that it was his fault that the record was not filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted. The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.