Case ID: ad_136/html/0936-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anna Berthe Grunspan, Appellant, v. William English Walling, Respondent.
    Appeal from an order- entered on the 8th day of November, 1909, granting a motion for an amended bill of particulars.
   Per Curiam:

The court could not compel the plaintiff by a bill of particulars to elect on which promise she should rely. The order should, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.