Case ID: so2d_782/html/0546-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David Joseph MERCADO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D00-1093.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 18, 2001.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Manuel Alvarez, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Michael Neimand, Assistant Attorney General, and Ana Cristina Lloyd, Certified Legal Intern, for appellee.
    Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Collier v. State, 701 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (contents of BOLO report were admissible where report contained no accusatory information and was not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, but to establish sequence of events); Williams v. State, 714 So.2d 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(tape recorded 911 calls made by victim and her son were admissible as excited utterances).