Case ID: so3d_238/html/0324-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Manila LAKMAITREE, Appellant, v. 21ST MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-1263
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [March 7, 2018]
    Brian Korte of Korte & Wortman, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Sonia Henriques McDowell of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

On the Court's own motion we recall our mandate issued on March 23, 2018, withdraw our prior opinion issued on March 7, 2018, and issue the following opinion in its place.

After the court entered an involuntary dismissal against the lender for failing to establish standing, the borrower requested an award of its attorney's fees. The court denied the motion, and the borrower appeals.

This Court answered the question raised in this appeal in our en banc opinion in Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Glass , 219 So.3d 896 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017). We subsequently addressed the issue in several cases, including Christiana Tr., a Div. of Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y, FSB for Normandy Mortgage Loan Tr., Series 2013-18 v. Rushlow , 231 So.3d 558 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017), and, more recently, Sabido v. Bank of New York Mellon , 4D16-2944, --- So.3d ----, 2018 WL 735950 (Fla. 4th DCA Feb. 7, 2018). Furthermore, our sister districts have uniformly reached the same conclusion. Bank of N.Y. Mellon Tr. Co. v. Fitzgerald , 215 So.3d 116 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) ; HFC Collection Ctr., Inc. v. Alexander , 190 So.3d 1114, 1116 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

We reject the borrower's argument that it is inequitable to apply these decisions; and, regardless, this Court's unanimous en banc decision is binding on this panel. Therefore, the circuit court's order is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Gerber, C.J., Gross and Kuntz, JJ., concur.