Case ID: sd_66/html/0404-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHRISTIANSEN, Respondent v. PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS. CO., Appellant
    (284 N. W. 437.)
    (File No. 8173.
    Opinion filed March 14, 1939.)
    
      Boyce, Warren & Pairbank, of Sioux Falls, for Appellant.
    
      Lars A. Bruce, of Yankton, for Respondent. '
   PER CURIAM.

This appeal involves the question as to whether the trial court erred in entering an order extending the period of redemption under what is commonly referred to- as the Moratorium Act, Chapter 207, Laws 1937. The period of redemption was extended to February x, 1939, and from such order defendant has appealed.

The order having expired by its own terms, the Court is of the opinion that the question presented on this appeal has become moot, and that the appeal therefore should be dismissed without cost to either party, as provided in section 10 of the act referred to-.

Order will be entered accordingly.

All the Judges concur.