Case ID: f-appx_20/html/0240-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Steven R. DeWITT, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eddie Lee PEARSON, Warden; Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Corrections, Sussex II State Prison; Officer Jonas, Waverly Prison Staff; Mailroom Personnel, Waverly Prison, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 01-6757.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 25, 2001.
    Decided Oct. 16, 2001.
    Steven R. DeWitt, Sr., pro se.
    Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

Steven R. DeWitt, Sr., appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint alleging denial of access to courts. Inmates have a fundamental right to “adequate, effective, and meaningful” access to the courts. Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817, 822, 97 S.Ct. 1491, 52 L.Ed.2d 72 (1977). We find that DeWitt was not prejudiced by Defendants’ actions. Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 351 52, 354-56, 116 S.Ct. 2174, 135 L.Ed.2d 606 (1996) (discussing prejudice requirement for denial of access to courts claims). Consequently, we affirm. DeWitt’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.