Case ID: f-appx_388/html/0258-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nathaniel BURRESS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-7461.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 24, 2010.
    Decided: July 15, 2010.
    Brendan S. Leary, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellant. Randolph John Bernard, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel Burress appeals the district court’s orders granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction, and denying his amended § 3582(c)(2) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Burress’s motions for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s orders. United States v. Burress, No. 5:04-cr-00031-FPS-JES-1 (N.D. W. Va. July 17, 2009); 2009 WL 5198296 (Dec. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.