Case ID: nj-eq_120/html/0201-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles E. Jaeckle and Wilbur F. Aurnhammer, on behalf of themselves, &c., complainants-appellants, v. L. Bamberger & Company, a body corporate, defendant-respondent.
    [Submitted February term, 1936.
    Decided April 24th, 1936.]
    
      Mr. Sydney A. Gutkin (Mr. I. Herbert Levy, of counsel), for the appellants.
    
      Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Skinner (Mr. Charles R. Hardin, of counsel), for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree dismissing the bill of complaint is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the learned vice-chancellor.

The question of the jurisdiction of equity to grant the relief sought by complainants is reserved.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, WolfsKeil, JJ. 9.

For reversal — Lloyd, Pebsiue, Raffeety, JJ. 3.