Case ID: kan_81/html/0196-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      \n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

L. K. Bonnewell, Appellant, v. J. T. Lowe, as Trustee, et al., Appellees.
    
    No. 16,178.
    
      Costs — Printing Counter Abstract. Cost of printing a counter abstract retaxed because matter was included not necessary to the decision of the questions of law involved.
    Motion to retax costs.
    Opinion filed November 12, 1909.
    Allowed.
    (For opinion on the merits see 80 Kan. 769.)
    
      W. P. Hackney, and J. T. Lafferty, for the appellant.
    
      L. H. Webb, and O. P. Fuller, for the appellees.
   Per Curiam:

In a motion to retax costs the appellant asks to be relieved of any charge for the printing of the counter abstract prepared by the appellees. The original abstract stated the questions of law sought to be raised, followed by so much of the record as was thought to bear upon these questions. The counter abstract contained other portions of the record, only a small part of which, estimated at one-tenth of the whole, appears to have been necessary for the determination of the controversy in this court. The motion is therefore allowed so far as relates to nine-tenths of the charge made for the counter abstract. (Beck v. Lowell, 78 Kan. 101, 104.)