Case ID: fla_113/html/0717-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

E. P. Duncan, as Liquidator for the Fort Lauderdale Bank & Trust Co., v. John W. Martin, et al.
    
    152 So. 16.
    Opinion Filed January 12, 1934.
    
      
      McCune, Hiaasen & Fleming, for Appellant;
    
      Fred M. Vals and C. E. Farrington, for Appellees.
   Per Curiam.

The appeal here is from a final decree in a case instituted by way of a creditor’s bill, the purpose of which was to set aside alleged fraudulent conveyances of an insolvent debtor. The correctness of the decree, appealed from depends upon whether or not there is evidence sufficient to support the decree. We find in the record substantial evidence to support the decree and as we cannot say that the conclusions of the Chancellor drawn from the evidence are clearly erroneous, the decree should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.