Case ID: fla_108/html/0260-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Henry S. McKenzie, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. S. Lisenby, as Receiver for East Florida Savings & Trust Company, a Banking Corporation, Defendant in Error.
    
    146 So. 572.
    En Banc.
    Decision filed February 10, 1933.
    Rehearing denied March 9, 1933.
    
      Hilburn & Merryday, J. V. Walton and Thomas B. Dowda, for Plaintiff in Error.
    
      Julian C. Calhoun and Richard W. Ervin, Jr., for Defendant in Error.
   Per Curiam.

The questions of law and fact presented in this case are similar to those presented in J. S. Lisenby, as Recéiver of East Florida Savings & Trust Company v, S. J. Motes, decided this date. The judgment below is therefore affirmed on authority of the doctrine ennounced in the latter case.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.