Case ID: njl_121/html/0585-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ANNY PRINZ, APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF PARAMUS, RESPONDENT.
    Submitted October 28, 1938
    Decided January 13, 1939.
    For the appellant, Insley, Decker & Cross.
    
    For the respondent, Charles Schmidt.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Walker, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.