Case ID: f-appx_76/html/0219-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JAMES W. FOWLER COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORCHEM, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 02-35240.
    D.C. No. CV-01-01424-HU (AJB).
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Sept. 12, 2003.
    Decided Sept. 30, 2003.
    Jeffrey B. Wilkinson, Stewart, Sokol & Gray, Jon M. Egan, Brayton Purcell, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Jeffrey K. Hanson, Joseph A. Yazbeck, Jr., Allen & O’Halloran LLP, Portland, OR, for Defendani>-Appe]lee.
    Before ALDISERT, LEAVY, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for the reasons set forth in the findings and recommendations of Magistrate Judge Hubei, as adopted by the district court on February 19, 2002. The several issues raised by appellant on appeal were fully reviewed by the Magistrate Judge. The district court did not err.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.