Case ID: nj-eq_108/html/0206-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edmund Wright-Ginsburg Company, Incorporated, respondent, v. Carlisle Ribbon Mills et al., appellants.
    [Submitted February term, 1931.
    Decided April 24th, 1931.]
    
      Messrs. Bilder Bilder, for the respondent.
    
      Messrs. Collins é Corbin, for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in 105 N. J. Eq. 411.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Dear, Wells,. JJ. 10.

For reversal—Parker, Van Buskirk, Kays, JJ. 3..