Case ID: nc_187/html/0856-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

B. E. PARHAM v. W. A. ADAMS COMPANY.
    (Filed 9 April, 1924.)
    Appeal by defendant from Devin, J., at October Term, 1923, of GRANVILLE.
    Civil action, to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury to plaintiff’s tobacco.
    Prom a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals, assigning errors.
    
      Hides & Stem for plaintiff.
    
    
      Parham. & Lassiter and D. G. Brummitt for defendant.
    
   Per Curiam.

Upon controverted issues of fact, tbe jury has determined tbe case in favor of plaintiff. A careful perusal of tbe record convinces us that tbe ease has been tried substantially in agreement with tbe law bearing on tbe subject, and we have discovered no ruling or. action on tbe part of tbe trial court which we apprehend' should be held for reversible error. There is nothing on tbe record which entitles tbe defendant to a new trial. Tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.