Case ID: cust-ct_37/html/0404-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Rao, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Before the Second Division,
    November 1, 1956
    No. 60317.
    protests 591898-G, etc. (Los Angeles).
    W. X. Huber Co. v. United States,
   Opinion by

Rao, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the merchandise at bar is of the same class or kind as that involved in the cases of Brin Bros. & Senegram, v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 127, C. D. 11701 and Abstract 58204. The witness for the plaintiff testified that the rags were of a kind chiefly used for papermaking. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.