Case ID: ga-l-rep_1/html/0373-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Jackson, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Decisions Rendered April 6, 1886.
    
    Berry et al. vs. Turner, et al Executors.
    Complaint foe Land, from Hancock. Res Adjudieata. Equitable Pleadings. Words and Phrases. Decrees. New Trial. (Before Judge Lumpkin.)
    Seaborn Tieese; J. T. Jordan, for plaintiffs in error.
    C. W. DuBose; James A. Harley, for defendants.
   Jackson, C. J.

1. Under equitable pleadings in an ejectment case, one issue being what amount the defendants were indebted to the plain- ■ tiffs on account of money for necessaries furnished to the former, and ■oír a former hearing in this court it having been held that the court, ■un;der an equitable plea, would justify “expenditures reasonably neees-sary for her (one of the defendants) and her children,’’ such'reasonable necessaries, including plantation tools, and food for hands and stock on a pdantation where she and her family were supported, and a recovery •therefor, was properly sustained. Berry et al, and Turner et al, (February Term. 1885, pam. p. 2S.)

2 No error in the decree appears, but were the decree wrong, it •would furnish no ground of a motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.