Case ID: a3d_96/html/0986-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dennis L. NESS and John E. Bowders, Petitioners v. YORK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Respondent.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    July 8, 2014.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Commonwealth Court commit an error of law when it determined that a Section 108 post-enactment notice, which was facially deficient, served as a shield against Petitionerfs’] claim that the underlying Zoning and SALDO Ordinances were defective and rendered moot all procedural challenges regarding the adoption of the ordinances?

The matter will be submitted on briefs.