Case ID: f-appx_698/html/0158-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Douglas C. CHARNOCK, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia; Edward W. Hanson, Jr.; Frederick B. Lowe, Jr., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 17-1049
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: September 19, 2017
    Decided: October 11, 2017
    Michael D.J. Eisenberg, LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL D.J. EISENBERG, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.
    Mark R. Herring, Attorney General of Virginia, Samuel T. Towell, Deputy Attorney General, Nicholas F. Simopoulos, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Christian A. Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Douglas C. Charnoek, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Charnock v. Virginia, No. 2:16-cv-00493-RAJ-LRL (E.D. Va. Jan. 5, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED