Case ID: ala_130/html/0559-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      TYSON, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Central of Georgia Railway Company v. Alabama & Florida Railroad.
    
      Gondem nation Proceedings.
    
    1. Condemnation proceedings j when appeal lies from probate court to Supreme Court. — Under the provisions of the statute (Code, § 1717) in condemnation proceedings, an appeal will lie direct to the Supreme Court from an order of the probate court granting the application of one railroad company for a right to condemn a right of way across the tracks and right of way of another railroad company, if taken within thirty days and before the order of condemnation or the assessment of damages, by the commissioners is entered, under section 1720 of the Code; but if the appeal is not sued out • until after the report of the commissioners and the order of condemnation is entered, it will not be sustained, but on motion will be dismissed.
    Appeal from the Probate Court of Covington.
    Heard before the Hon. J. M. Kobinson.
    The appellee, the Alabama & Florida Railroad, filed its application in the probate court of Covington county to have a right of way condemned across the road of the Central of Georgia Railroad at a point in Andalusia. Upon tlie filing of the petition, a day was set for the hearing of the cause. On the hearing there was testimony offered by each party. After hearing all the evidence, the court rendered a decree in “which it was “ordered, adjudged and decreed by the court that the application of the said Alabama & Florida Railroad be and the same is hereby granted.” It is further ordered that “three certain named persons be appointed as commissioner's to assess the damages and compensation to which the Central of Georgia Railway Company was entitled.” This decree then further ordered that said commissioners should, within ten days from the date of their appointment, report to the court the amount of damage and compensation ascertained and assessed by them. It was further ordered in said decree that the defendant have thirty days within which to prepare and present a bill of exceptions. This decree was rendered on August 26, 1899. The bill of exceptions was presented and signed on September 23, 1899, and the appeal rvas taken by the Central of Georgia Railway Company on said date, by the giving of bond, etc. In this court the appellee made a motion to dismiss the appeal, upon the following ground: “Because the appeal is taken from a preliminary order of the court and not from any final judgment.”
    Powell & Albritton, for appellant,
    cited Woodioard Iron Go. v. Oabaniss, 87 Ala. 328; Postal Tel. Gable Go. v. A. G. 8. B. R. Go., 92 Ala. 331; M. & O'. R. R. Go. v. Hopkins, 108 Ala. 159; M. & G. R. R. Go. v. B., 8. & T. R. R. Go., 96 Ala. 571; Yerby v. Goohrane, 101 Ala. 541; Anniston & Gin. R. R..Go. v. Jacksonville, 82 Ala. 297.
    J. M. Falkner, Henry Opp and Ray Rushton, contra.
    
    The appeal in this case should h.ave been dismissed. — 'Code, §§ 1717, 1720; ilf. 8. R. Go. v. 8anjre, 72 Ala. 443; Woodward-1. Go. v. Gabaniss, 87 Ala. 328; Pos. Tel. Gable Go. v. A. G. 8. R. R. Go., 92 Ala. 331; Ala. Mid. R. Go. v. Newton, 94 Ala. 447.
   TYSON, J.

In 'construing sections 1717 and 1720 of the Code, this court said in Birmingham Railway & Electric Co. v. Birmingham Traction Co., 128 Ala. 110: “The right of appeal under section 1717 may be exercised at any time within the thirty days allowed, provided it is so exercised before any order is made on the report of the commissioners under section 1720 at which time the right of appeal under this latter statute arises.” We have no disposition to depart from the principles declared in that case. Every question involved in the case was thoroughly considered, and what was there said, we now adhere to. The present appeal was not sued out until after the report of the commissioners and an order of condemnation was entered pursuant thereto by the probate court.— 'Code, § 1720. It, therefore, must be dismissed.