Case ID: us_282/html/0801-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 443.
    Dunn v. Ohio.
    Jurisdictional statement submitted October 20, 1930.
    Decided October 27, 1930.
   Per Curiam:

Messrs. Rufus S. Day and W. E. Minshall for appellant. Messrs. Gilbert Beitman, Frank R. Hubachek, Henry 8. Brainard, and Alfred Clum for respondent.

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Griffith v. Connecticut, 218 U. S. 563; Mutual Loan Co. v. Martell, 222 U. S. 225, 233; Morgan v. Georgia, 281 U. S. 691. The petition for a writ of certiorari in this cause is denied.