Case ID: dc_1/html/0173-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "The Court", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Davis, Cope et al. v. James Marshall.
    A defendant, discharged under the insolvent law of Pennsylvania, may appear here and discharge an attachment without giving special bail. a
    Attachment of goods under the Act of Assembly, 1795, e. 56.
    
      Mr. Mason, for the defendant,
    moved to appear without bail, so as to discharge the attachment. The debt was contracted in Maryland. The defendant removed to Pennsylvania, where his creditors arrested him, and he was released under the insolvent law of Pennsylvania. The plaintiffs sued in the General Court of Maryland. On producing the discharge, the General Court admitted an appearance without bail; and the plaintiffs struck off the suit there, and laid this attachment in the District of Columbia.
    
      Mr.Morsell, for the plaintiffs,
    objected, 1st. That the Act is not in force in this district. 2d. That the defendant'cannot dissolve the attachment without giving bail.
   The Court

permitted defendant to appear .on filing common bail.

Cranch, J., did not sit in this case.