Case ID: so2d_403/html/0546-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kenneth G. RENICK and Susan B. Renick, Appellants, v. Marlene MILLION, Appellee.
    No. 80-2172.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Sept. 2, 1981.
    Rehearing Denied Oct. 7, 1981.
    Glenn H. Mitchell of Spillias & Mitchell, West Palm Beach, for appellants.
    No appearance for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Based on a complaint seeking permanent injunctive relief, Kenneth and Susan Renick obtained a temporary restraining order to prevent Marlene Million from harassing them with threatening and profane phone calls. At a subsequent hearing, the trial court determined that injunctive relief was not proper to restrain a criminal act and, therefore, dissolved the temporary restraining order. We express no opinion on the merits of the action because at issue here is a temporary order, the issuance or dissolution of which is clearly within the discretion of the trial court. We find that appellants have failed to demonstrate any abuse of discretion in the dissolution of the tempo--rary restraining order.

AFFIRMED.

BERANEK, GLICKSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., concur.