Case ID: f-appx_104/html/0710-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daouda TOURE, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Respondent.
    No. 04-9570.
    United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
    Aug. 6, 2004.
    Gerald E. Burns, Chandler, AZ, for Petitioner.
    Emily A. Radford, General Counsel, Shahira M. Tadross, United States Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Mike Comfort, Acting Dist. Dir., Immigration & Naturalization Service, Denver, CO, Thomas W. Hussey, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before SEYMOUR, EBEL, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER AND JUDGMENT

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

On July 16, 2004, we directed petitioner Daouda Toure to show cause within fourteen days why his petition for review should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. On July 21, 2004, the government filed a motion to dismiss. Petitioner’s response to our show cause order was due by July 30, 2004. Having received no response, we hold that we lack jurisdiction over petitioner’s petition for review for the reasons set out in our July 16 order. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the petition for review is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. 
      
       This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.