Case ID: ny-2d_43/html/0947-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph Lanzi, Appellant, v Arthur Brooks, Respondent.
    Submitted February 13, 1978;
    decided February 22, 1978
   Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: "This determination is without prejudice to an application by appellant to Supreme Court for leave to serve an amended complaint, such application to include a copy of the proposed amended complaint accompanied by a disclosure of the evidentiary facts which would support the claim set forth in the proposed amended complaint and would justify the granting of such leave (cf. CPLR 3211, subd [d]).” [See 43 NY2d 778.]