Case ID: f-appx_462/html/0378-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Russell G. ROGERS, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 09-6404.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 10, 2012.
    Decided: Jan. 26, 2012.
    Russell G. Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Dana James Boente, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Russell G. Rogers appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and reducing his sentence by one month to the statutory mandatory minimum. We previously remanded this matter to the district court for a determination as to the timeliness of the appeal. The appeal having been determined to be timely, we turn to the merits of the case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rogers, No. 1:03-cr-00609-CMH-1 (E.D. Va. June 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.