Case ID: f-appx_464/html/0126-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Myles SPIRES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lieutenant HARBAUGH; Officer Crowe, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 11-7127.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 9, 2012.
    Decided: Feb. 13, 2012.
    Myles Spires, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Myles Spires appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his motions for appointment of counsel and to supplement the complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Spires v. Harbaugh, No. 1:10-cv-01597-RDB, 2011 WL 3489883 (D. Md. filed Aug. 5,.2011; entered Aug. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.