Case ID: so2d_647/html/0904-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Antoneeze HAYNES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 93-2211.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Nov. 23, 1994.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 26, 1995.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Mallorye G. Cunningham, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm in all respects except one. The State concedes the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences for count I and count III. Therefore, sentences for count I and III should run concurrently.

Accordingly, we affirm the convictions and sentences, except for the State’s concession of sentencing error and remand to the trial court.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., and BARR, ROBBIE M., Associate Judge, concur.