Case ID: f-appx_42/html/0660-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Oranie Galindo FORBES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dan L. DOVE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 02-6697.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 15, 2002.
    Decided Aug. 20, 2002.
    Oranie Galindo Forbes, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Oranie Galindo Forbes appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Forbes v. Dove, CA-01-30-7-24BG (D.S.C. Apr. 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.