Case ID: f-appx_29/html/0820-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CARGILL-ALLIANT, LLC, Appellant, v. GPU SERVICES, INC.
    No. 01-1605.
    United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
    Argued Jan. 17, 2002.
    Opinion Filed Feb. 1, 2002.
    
      Brad Fagg (Argued), Morgan, Lewis & Brockius, LLP, Washington, DC, Counsel for Appellant.
    Alfred W. Putnam, Jr. (argued), Jeff A. Almeida, Drinker, Biddle & Reath, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Counsel for Appellee.
    Before: ALITO and ROTH, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge.
   MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The facts and procedural background of this case are familiar to the parties. After a bench trial, the District Court properly held for GPU Services. In its 47-page Opinion, the District Court correctly concluded that GPU Services did not breach its contractual obligations to Cargill-Alliant. Therefore, Appellant cannot recover from Appellee for its alleged loss of $2.3 million. We have considered all of Appellant’s arguments and find no ground to reverse.

The Order of the District Court is AFFIRMED.