Case ID: misc_145/html/0425-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Howell, S.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Estate of Arthur W. Watson, Deceased.
    Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County,
    April 21, 1931.
    
      Hughes, Schurman & Dwight, for the petitioner.
   Howell, S.

I cannot find in this will an authority to hold these stocks as a permanent investment. I do feel that the trustees should have such time as good sound judgment may require to protect the estate against the sale of sound securities in a market that is of common knowledge depressed.

There is no advantage to an estate to arbitrarily, even under statute, deplete the estate.

The trustees are held to a diligent protection of the estate, and such exercise of judgment in the present condition of the market should not be marked arbitrarily by months.

I like the rule laid down in Matter of Weston (91 N. Y. 502), where the court says: “ Where no modifying facts are shown to shorten or lengthen the reasonable time, the period of eighteen months may serve as a just standard,” although it was also held that while such period furnishes a convenient guide where no special circumstances exist, it must, after all not be taken as a fixed or arbitrary standard. The test must remain, the diligence and prudence of prudent and intelligent men in the management of their own affairs.”