Case ID: nys_150/html/1100-14.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PALM, FECHTLER & CO., Respondents, v. FECHTLER et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    December 31, 1914.)
    Action by the Palm, Fechtler & Co. against Frank Fechtler and another. P. R. Towne, of New York City, for appellants. • E. B. Boise, of New York City, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

SCOTT and HOTCHKISS, JJ., dissent, on the ground that it was error to exclude defendant from proving the expenses involved in making the profit which was charged. Order filed.