Case ID: misc_35/html/0829-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Adolph Horowitz, Appellant, v. Charles E. Smith, Respondent.
    Appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the defendant in the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, sixth district, borough of Manhattan.
    J. R. Tressider, for appellant.
    J. E. Brodsky, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

A review of the testimony shows that the court below, upon conflicting evidence as to the status and authority of Skinner, found in favor of the defendant. That conclusion necessarily resulted in a judgment for the defendant, and we are disinclined to disturb it, in face of the conflict in the proofs.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.