Case ID: nys_147/html/1146-09.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UHL, Respondent, v. INTERNATIONAL RY. CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    March 25, 1914.)
    Action by Rosina Uhl, as executrix, etc., against the International Railway Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

KRUSE, P. J., dissents, upon the ground thai under the rule of law charged by the trial judge no negligence was shown entitling the plaintiff to recover.