Case ID: f-appx_530/html/0263-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ida HAWKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Joe HAIRSTON; Joan Murphy; Margaret A. Howie; Lawrence Schmidt, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 13-1156.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 20, 2013.
    Decided: June 25, 2013.
    Ida Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew G. Scott, Lisa Y. Settles, Leslie Robert Stellman, Pessin & Katz, PA, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ida Hawkins appeals the district court’s order granting the defendants’ Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hawkins v. Hairston, No. 1:12-cv-01366-JKB, 2012 WL 5503839 (D.Md. Nov. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.