Case ID: nj-eq_92/html/0705-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carl Schefrin, respondent, v. Philip Wilensky et al., appellants.
    [Decided June 20th, 1921.]
    On appeal from a decree of tlie court of chancery.
    
      Messrs. Weinberger <£• Weinberger, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. George G. Tennant and Messrs. Sullivan & Sullivan, for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, whose opinion is reported in 92 N. J. Eq. 109.

For affirmance—The Ci-iie,e-Justice, Swayzb, Trenoi-iard, Bergen, Minturn, Tyalisch, Black, PIeppeniieimer, Williams, Gardner—10.

For reversal—Parker, Katzenbacii, White—3.