Case ID: ad2d_297/html/0323-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Protectors of Pine Oak Woods, Inc., et al., Appellants, v City of New York et al., Respondents.
    [746 NYS2d 264]
   As the Supreme Court correctly noted in its well-reasoned decision, there is no likelihood that the petitioners will succeed on the merits of their underlying petition. Thus, the Supreme Court providently denied the petitioners’ motion for a preliminary injunction (see CPLR 6311; Doe v Axelrod, 73 NY2d 748, 750; Grant Co. v Srogi, 52 NY2d 496, 517; Sheffield Towers Rehabilitation & Health Care Ctr. v Novello, 293 AD2d 182; Mosseri v Fried, 289 AD2d 545). Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.