Case ID: so2d_616/html/0195-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jose V. SILVA and Alma E. Silva, Appellants, v. Serafin HERNANDEZ, Appellee.
    No. 91-2240.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 13, 1993.
    Gonzalez & Vidal and Jorge L. Gonzalez, Coral Gables, for appellants.
    Michelle B. Alvarez, Coral Gables, for appellee.
    Before NESBITT, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
   ON CONSIDERATION PURSUANT TO REMAND

PER CURIAM.

We revisit this cause upon remand from the Florida Supreme Court. Silva v. Hernandez, 612 So.2d 1377 (Fla.1993). Pursuant to the court’s directive, we have considered Silva’s affidavit as timely filed. The record demonstrates that Hernandez has failed to rebut Silva’s legally sufficient affirmative defense: genuine issues of material fact remain unresolved. Duke v. Reed, 396 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). See Haven Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Kirian, 579 So.2d 730, 733 (Fla.1991). Accordingly, the trial court erred in entering summary judgment. We, therefore, reverse the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.