Case ID: sw2d_804/html/0800-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Thomas BAGWELL, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 58017.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Jan. 8, 1991.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 7, 1991.
    Gerald M. Dunne, Daniel V. O’Brien, St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., John P. Pollard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction of the sale of a schedule I controlled substance.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).