Case ID: f-appx_70/html/0145-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Fredrick WALKER, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-6498.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted July 24, 2003.
    Decided July 30, 2003.
    
      Michael Fredrick Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Michael Fredrick Walker appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking to compel the government to file a motion to reduce his sentence under Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Walker, No. CR-97-443 (D.S.C. Mar. 11, 2003). Walker’s motion to remand is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.