Case ID: so2d_844/html/0778-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Oscar J. RODRIGUES, Appellant, v. Celso CASSIANO, Appellee.
    No. 3D02-2383.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 14, 2003.
    A. Margaret Hesford, Margate, for appellant.
    Arthur J. Morburger, Miami, for appel-lee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FLETCHER, J., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Mangus v. Present, 135 So.2d 417, 419 (Fla.1961)(either a benefit or advantage to the promisor, or detriment or inconvenience to the promisee, is legal consideration for a contract); 11 Fla. Jur 2d Contracts § 88, Benefit or Detriment (2003).