Case ID: ala-app_26/html/0622-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SAMFORD, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

162 So. 922
    John BRADFORD v. STATE.
    8 Div. 188.
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    June 25, 1935.
    Powell & Powell, of Hartselle, for appellant.
    A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for the State.
   SAMFORD, Judge.

We have read the evidence in this case, and find that the slate has failed to furnish evidence of a guilty scienter on the part of defendant. Defendant’s motion for a new trial should have been granted. Guin v. State, 19 Ala. App. 67, 94 So. 788.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.