Case ID: cust-ct_1/html/0475-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 39809.
    Protests 262223-G, etc., of Hattie Carnegie et al. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in .question was held dutiable as follows: (1) cellulose filaments the same as those passed upon in Abstract 37230 at 60 percent under paragraph 31; C2) embroidered articles and embroidered wearing apparel like those the subject of Glemby’s v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397) at 75 percent under paragraph 1430; and (3) artificial flowers the same as those the subject of Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.