Case ID: so2d_775/html/0999-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

COMMERCIAL LAUNDRIES, INC., Appellant, v. EUREKA HOUSING CORP., Appellee.
    No. 3D00-1069.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 20, 2000.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 14, 2001.
    Ainslee R. Ferdie, Miami and Tu Chin Om, for appellant.
    Blajdberg, Grayson, Kukoff & Segal and Moisés T. Grayson, Miami and Carmen L. Fanego, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and SHEVIN and SORONDO, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Because genuine material issues remain for appropriate resolution, including but not necessarily limited to questions of standing, implied actual notice of the interests of the tenant, see Lee County Bank v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 126 So.2d 589 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961); Bodden v. Carbonell, 354 So.2d 927 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), and laches, see City of Miami v. Carter, 105 So.2d 5 (Fla.1958); City of Miami v. Gates, 393 So.2d 586 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), review denied, 402 So.2d 608 (Fla.1981), the summary judgment reforeclosing the appellant’s leasehold is reversed for further proceedings.