Case ID: f-appx_676/html/0204-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ri’Cha ri SANCHO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANDERSON SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUR, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 16-1960
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: January 30, 2017
    Decided: February 16, 2017
    
      Ri’Cha ri Sancho, Appellant Pro Se. Allison Aiken Hanna, Mary Allison Caudell, CHILDS & HALLIGAN, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ri’Cha ri Sancho appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Anderson School District Four on her claims of a hostile work environment, disparate treatment, and retaliation; in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000&-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sancho v. Anderson Sch. Dist. Four, No. 8:15-cv-01353-HMH, 2016 WL 4123910 (D.S.C. Aug. 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED 
      
       To the extent that Sancho requests a payment plan for her mediation fee, Sancho should direct her request to the district court in the first instance.