Case ID: ga-app_23/html/0736-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

10167.
    Puckett v. Georgia Railway & Power Company.
    Decided May 14, 1919.
    Rehearing denied June 9, 1919.
    Action for damages; from Fulton superior court—Judge Ellis. September 25, 1918.
    
      Loving & Poole, for plaintiff.
    
      Colquitt & Conyers, for defendant.
   Broyles, P. J.

1. Under the pleadings and the evidence, the court did not'err in directing a verdict for the defendant, or in refusing to grant a new trial.

2. Even if the rejection of testimony as complained of in’ the motion for a new trial was error, it does not, under all the facts of the case, require a reversal of the judgment below.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.