Case ID: so2d_313/html/0696-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BOYD, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles Hezicki VERRIETT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 45901.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    May 21, 1975.
    Henry Gonzalez, Tampa, for petitioner.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Andrew W. Lindsey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
   BOYD, Justice.

This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, reported at 295 So.2d 323. Conflict has been alleged between the decision sought to be reviewed and Cone v. State and Trousdale v. State. The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further careful consideration of the matter in light of this Court’s recent opinion in Estevez v. State, we have concluded that the issues involved sub judice have been resolved by Estevez, supra.

Accordingly, the writ must be, and hereby is, discharged.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, C. J., ROBERTS and ENGLAND, JJ., and MUSZYNSKI, Circuit Judge, concur. 
      
      . 285 So.2d 12 (Fla.1973).
     
      
      . 287 So.2d 721 (Fla.App.19T4).
     
      
      . Article Y, Section 3(b) (3).
     
      
      . Fla., 313 So.2d 692, opinion filed February 26, 1975.