Case ID: so2d_656/html/0269-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Shanard KING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 94-3234.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    June 21, 1995.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Karen E. Ehrlich, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joan Fowler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The order of revocation of probation is affirmed but remanded to conform to the oral pronouncement of the trial court that the revocation was based on allegations 2, 3, and 4 of the amended affidavit and not on allegations 1, 2 and 3. A corrected order should be entered,

DELL, C.J., and WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.