Case ID: so2d_165/html/0432-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Louise VOILER and Harry O. Voiler, her husband, Appellants, v. FAN & BILL’S, INC. OF MIAMI, a Florida corporation, d/b/a Chandler’s Restaurant and Chandler’s Restaurant, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
    No. 63-872.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    June 23, 1964.
    Kelner & Lewis, Miami, for appellants.
    Shapiro, Fried & Weil, Miami Beach, for appellees.
    Before CARROLL, HORTON and TILLMAN PEARSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellants proceeded under § 55.24, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. and urge error in the refusal of the Court to appoint a receiver thereunder. An examination of the record reveals that the appellants failed to substantially comply with the requirements of this statute in that their petition was unverified and was not directed to the “circuit court sitting in chancery”. We must decline therefore to hold the trial judge in error upon a refusal to grant the relief requested.

Affirmed.