Case ID: so2d_860/html/0529-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, Petitioner, v. In re 1997 AND 1998 CLAIMS OF ECUADORIAN SHRIMP FARMERS, Respondent.
    No. 4D03-3048.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Dec. 10, 2003.
    Jane Kreusler-Walsh, Rebecca Mercier-Vargas of Jane Kreusler-Walsh, P.A., West Palm Beach; Daniel F. Molony of Shook, Hardy & Bacon, L.L.P., Tampa; Thomas M. Sherouse of Shook, Hardy & Bacon, L.L.P., Miami; for petitioner.
    Walter G. Campbell, Jr., Robert McKee, Ivan Cabrera of Krupniek, Campbell, Malone, Roselli, Buser, Slama, Hancock & McKee; Bruce Rogow and Beverly A. Pohl of Bruce S. Rogow, P.A., Fort Lauderdale; for respondent.
   ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

We deny petitioner’s motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc but issue the following revised opinion in lieu of our slip opinion issued on October 8, 2003:

Although we find the affidavit in support of prohibition signed by petitioner’s in-house counsel, Ms. Kittredge, meets the requirements of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.160(c) in this case, we deny the petition as the motion for disqualification was legally insufficient.

GUNTHER, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur. 
      
      . Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Parsons, 644 So.2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).