Case ID: njl_122/html/0467-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. EDWIN W. DORCH, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted February 17, 1939
    Decided April 21, 1939.
    For the defendant in error, David T. Wilentz, attorney-general, and Alexander F. Ormsby, assistant attorney-general.
    For the plaintiff in error, Thomas Brunetto.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment tinder review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.