Case ID: f2d_469/html/1394-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Raymond M. HAMILTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter E. CRAVEN, Warden, Defendant-Appellant (two cases).
    Nos. 71-2737, 71-2844.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Dec. 21, 1972.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 29, 1973.
    Sanford Svetcov, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), W. Eric Collins, Deputy Atty. Gen., Doris H. Maier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Herbert L. Ashby, Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
    Emil Roy Eisenhardt (argued), Lee Van Boven, of Farella, Braun & Martel, San Francisco, Cal., Michael E. Smith, Berkeley, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
    Before WRIGHT, KILKENNY and CHOY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district judge. Hamilton v. Craven, 350 F.Supp. 1251 (N.D.Cal.1971). We do not reach other issues raised by appellant or by appellee on the cross-appeal.

Judgment affirmed.