Case ID: mont_94/html/0609-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 7,104
    STATE, Appellant, v. DALE ROSENSTEEL, Respondent.
    Decided April 24, 1933.
    
      Mr. Baymond T. Nagle, Attorney General, and Mr. C. F. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
   PER CURIAM.

On motion of the Attorney General, it is ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed, the question sought’ to be reviewed having become moot by the enactment of Chapter 108, Laws of 1933, declaring that removal of personal property covered by a conditional sale contract, without consent of the vendor, constitutes larceny.