Case ID: njl_120/html/0190-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. HARRY SUCKOW ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.
    Submitted February 11, 1938 —
    Decided April 29, 1938.
    For the plaintiffs in error, Ward Kremer.
    
    For the defendant in error, T. Raymond Bazley.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Pekskie, Poetee, Heteield, Deae, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeeety, Walked, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.