Case ID: pr_12/html/0059-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Me. Justice Wole", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People v. Haddock.
    Appeal from the District Court of Guayama.
    No. 59.
    Decided February 13, 1907.
    Appeal — Bill op Exceptions — Statement op Facts — Manipest Errors.— Where there is no hill of exceptions or statement of facts, and it does not appear from the record that any error has been committed which would warrant the reversal of the judgment appealed 'from, the same should be affirmed.
    Tbe facts are stated in the opinion.
    
      Mr. Bossy, fiscal, for respondent.
    The appellant did not appear.
   Me. Justice Wole

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a prosecution against Jorge Haddock for disturbing the peace. The appeal was apparently taken for the sole purpose of delay, and there has been no appearance for the appellant and no bill of exceptions or brief filed.

We have examined the record, and find no error, and the judgment must be affirmed. d &

7 Affirmed.

Chief Justice Quiñones and Justices Hernández, MacLeary and Wolf concurred.