Case ID: sw3d_172/html/0501-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Betty J. STOWELL, Appellant.
    No. WD 64058.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Sept. 27, 2005.
    
      Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Amy M. Bartholow, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
    Before HARDWICK, P.J., BRECKENRIDGE and SPINDEN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Betty Stowell appeals from her conviction on two counts of possessing a controlled substance in violation of Section 195.202, RSMo.2000. She contends the trial court abused its discretion in disallowing certain inquiries during voir dire.

Upon review of the record, we find no abuse of discretion and affirm the convictions. We have provided the parties with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).