Case ID: f-appx_46/html/0155-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Demetrious Eric BROWN, a/k/a Denrick Eric Brown, a/k/a Demmrick Eric Brown, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director; Gene M. Johnson, Deputy; Refus Fleming, Regional Director; David Garraghty, Chief Warden; S.J. Avent, Administrative Assistant Warden; J.D. Oaths, Medical Administrator for the Virginia Department of Corrections; J. Capps, Human Rights Advocate; Charles Allen, Unit Manager; B. Phillips, Medical Administrator for CMS; Ella Klug, Regional Administrator for CMS; Beth Kennedy, Regional Manager for CMS; Mike Pfeiffer, Medical Operation Manager for CMS; Annette Holmes, Medical Administrator of CMS; K. Hamlin, Head Nurse for CMS; D. Sloan, LPN for CMS; C. Manning, LPN for CMS; Roy P. Harris, Prison Guard, Lieutenant; Vincent M. Gore, Doctor for CMS; M. Vernon Smith, Doctor, Health Care Director; Doctor Swether; Doctor Salih; Gloria Sloan; Roy J. Harrison, Lieutenant; Doctor Swetter, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 02-6685.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 29, 2002.
    Decided Sept. 5, 2002.
    Demetrious Eric Brown, Appellant Pro Se. John D. McChesny, Rawls & NcNelis, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Demetrious Eric Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2002) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Brown’s motion to appoint counsel, and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v. Angelone, No. CA-01-144-AM (E.D. Va., filed Mar. 28, 2002; entered Mar. 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.