Case ID: mass_257/html/0114-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "By the Court.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Horace S. Holt vs. Marion B. Holt.
    Hampden.
    September 23, 1926.
    September 30, 1926.
    Present: Rugg, C.J., Crosby, Carroll, Wait, & Sanderson, JJ.
    
      Probate Court, Jurisdiction. Marriage and Divorce.
    
    This court having determined that a probate court, in which there had been a hearing of a libel for divorce which resulted in a decree of divorce, had been without jurisdiction of the case, that hearing and decree were void and, upon a transfer of the case to a probate court of another county in accordance with a rescript of this court, the second court must proceed to consideration and decision of the case as if there had been no previous hearing and decree.
    Libel for divorce, filed in the Probate Court for the county of Middlesex on October 3, 1923.
    After a decree nisi, the libellee filed objections to a decree absolute which were overruled by Leggat, J. The libellee appealed and this court, in a decision reported 253 Mass. 412, reversed the decree and issued the rescript described below in the opinion.
    The case then was transferred to the Probate Court for the county of Hampden and proceedings there, described in the opinion, occurred before Long, J. From a decree dismissing the libel the libellant appealed,
    
      F. L. Norton, for the libellant.
    
      G. D. Cummings, for the libellee.
   By the Court.

This libel for divorce was brought in the Probate Court for Middlesex County, was tried there and a decree was entered in favor of the libellant. The libellee appealed to this court and the case is reported in 253 Mass. 411. The rescript ordered that, “If within sixty days after September 19, 1925, . . . the libellant moves for a transference to the county of Hampden and it is granted, the entry will be, appeal dismissed; but if not granted, the entry must be, libel dismissed for want of jurisdiction.” Pursuant to that rescript, motion was duly made and granted and the case was transferred to the Probate Court for Hampden County. Thereupon the libellant moved that a decree absolute in favor of the libellant be entered. This motion was denied and the libellant appealed. Thereafter the libel was set down for hearing on its merits and, the libellant failing to appear, the libel was dismissed and the libellant appealed. The sole contention of the libellant is that he was entitled to a decree in his favor on the strength of the hearing and decree in the Probate Court for Middlesex County. That contention cannot be supported. The decision of the case when it was here at its earlier stage was that the Probate Court of Middlesex County was without jurisdiction. Hearing and decree before a court without jurisdiction are void. The force and effect of the decision to that effect were aptly and succinctly stated in the rescript. After the libel was transferred to the court having jurisdiction, such court must proceed to consideration and decision as if there had been no previous hearing and decree. There is no error on this record.

Denial of motion affirmed.

Decree affirmed.