Case ID: sw2d_852/html/0433-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mark A. PATTERSON, Claimant/Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Employer/Respondent.
    No. 62613.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    May 18, 1993.
    James J. Logan, McMichael & Logan, Chesterfield, for claimant, appellant.
    Richard J. Fitzgerald, Luke & Cunliff, P.C., St. Louis, for employer, respondent.
    Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) affirming the dismissal, for failure to prosecute, of his workers’ compensation claim. We affirm. The Commission’s award is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).