Case ID: so2d_111/html/0034-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Arthur BURTON, Respondent.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    April 17, 1959.
    Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Irving B. Levenson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
    Joseph A. Varón, Hollywood, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction. We issued the writ and set the matter for hearing on the merits as well as on the aspect of this Court’s jurisdiction under Article V, Section 4, Constitution of Florida, F.S.A. After such hearing we have the view that the petition is without merit, therefore, the writ must be and it is hereby discharged. 107 So.2d 140.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, Acting Chief Justice, HOB-SON, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., and TAYLOR, Circuit Judge, concur.