Case ID: ga_150/html/0671-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Eisii, 0. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nelson v. Nelson.
   Eisii, 0. J.

1. On the hearing of a rule requiring the respondent to show cause why he should not be adjudged in contempt for failure to pay alimony in pursuance of an order formerly granted, while the evidence was conflicting, there was evidence submitted in behalf of the respondent which authorized the judge to find that subsequently to the grant of alimony the petitioner and the respondent had voluntarily lived together and cohabited as husband and wife for something like a month, that he afterwards left her by reason oE the discovery for the first time that she had committed adultery after the allowance of alimony and between the date of their separation and their rccohabitation, and that later ho obtained a total divorce from her on the ground of her adultery. Held, that this was sufficient cause to warrant the judge in refusing to make the rule absolute. See Jennison v. Jennison, 136 Ga. 202 (3a), 2l0 (71 S. E. 244, Ann. Cas. 1912C, 441).

No. 2047.

November 11, 1920.

Attachment for contempt. Before Judge Terrell. Coweta superior court. April 21, 1920.

Stanford Arnold and W. L. Stallings, for plaintiff.

T. G. Farmer Jr., for defendant.

2. It was not error to admit in evidence, on behalf of the respondent, the record of the divorce proceedings; nor was there error in the other rulings as to the admission of evidence, which requires a reversal.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.