Case ID: ad_268/html/0817-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Toffik Shalala et al., Petitioners, against John F. O'Connell et al., Individually and as Members Constituting the State Liquor Authority, Respondents.
   Determination confirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. All concur, except Dowling, J., who dissents and votes for annulling the determination in the following memorandum: The findings and determination of the Authority are not supported by any substantial evidence as required by section 1296 of the Civil Practice Act. The determination, therefore, should be annulled and the proceedings should be dismissed. (Matter of Konopka v. Bruckman, 290 N. Y. 777; People v. Rankin, 92 Misc. 62, 75.) (Proceeding to review the determination of the State Liquor Authority which revoked petitioners’ restaurant liquor license.) Present — Cunningham, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.