Case ID: ohio-cir-dec_12/html/0726-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ATTACHMENT.
    [Hamilton Circuit Court.]
    Wintering v. Corrigan.
    Attachment wire not Hie for Injury by Dog.
    In a suit for injuries by a vicious dog, an attachment will not lie on the ground that the harboring of a vicious dog is in violation of a criminal statute.
    
      Healy & Brannan, attorneys.
   The plaintiff sued for damages on account of a dog bite, and obtained an attachment on the ground that the harboring of a vicious dog by the defendant was in violation of a crimina! statute: Held, that the injury complained of did not tall within the scope ot the statute in question. Attachment discharged.