Case ID: okla_169/html/0524-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CUBIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MILLER v. BERRYMAN.
    No. 23462.
    Nov. 27, 1934.
    C. B. Leedy, for plaintiff in error.
    Madden, Adkins, Pipkins & Kiffer and O. L. Aley (H. Adkins, of counsel), for defendant in error.
   PER CUBIAM.

The plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff in the lower court, appealed this cause from a judgment pronounced in favor of defendant in error.

The case-made was certified by the court clerk, settled and signed by the trial judge, and attested by the clerk with the seal of the court thereto attached, but there is no filing mark in the case-made to indicate that the same was filed with the papers in the ease as provided in section 785, O. 0. S. 1921 (section 534, O. S. 1931).

Among other things, this section of the statute provides:

“* * * The case and amendments shall, upon three days’ notice, be submitted to the judge, who shall settle and sign the same, and cause it to be attested by the clerk and the seal of the court to be thereto attached. It shall then be filed with the papers in the case. * *

This court has uniformly held that the statute above quoted is mandatory. St. Louis-I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Burrow, 33 Okla. 701, 127 P. 478; St. Louis-S. & F. R. Co. v. Blassingame & Woodward, 76 Okla. 183, 184 P. 574; Backenstock v. Young, 121 Okla. 156, 248 P. 611: St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Bonham, 43 Okla. 637, 143 P. 660; Hall v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 82 Okla. 158, 198 P. 999.

The case-made not having been filed with the papers in the case after settling and signing by the court and attested by the clerk, this court cannot accept jurisdiction of this appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

The Supreme Court acknowledges the aid of Attorneys Fred M. Carter, Hayes McCoy, and John F. Pendleton in the preparation of this opinion. These attorneys constituted an advisory committee selected by the State Bar, appointed by the Judicial Council, and approved by the Supreme Court. After the analysis of law and facts was prepared by Mr. Carter, and approved by Mr. McCoy and Mr. Pendleton, the cause was assigned to a Justice of this court for examination and report to the court. Thereafter, upon consideration, this opinion was adopted.