Case ID: ny-sup-ct_32/html/0317-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Morris F. Sheppard, Appellant, v. Frank Earle, Respondent.
    
   Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Meld, that as the complaint contains sufficient allegations to constitute a cause of action for the recovery of the money paid, on the ground of an entire failure of consideration, all the other allegations may be disregarded, and a recovery may be had on that ground if the evidence warrants it. (33 N. Y., 581; 42 id., 83.) This point was not passed upon on the former appeal, all that was then held being that an action for a breach of warranty could not be maintained upon the facts proved.