Case ID: ny_302/html/0560-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Appellant, v. Pauline Casalino, Respondent.
    Submitted January 2, 1951;
    decided January 4, 1951.
   Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended to read as. follows: Order affirmed, with costs, tlpon this appeal there.' was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under a. Federal statute, namely, whether the judgment secured by the; plaintiff was dischargeable in bankruptcy under the Bankruptcy Act (§ 57, subd. [j]; U. S. Code, tit. 11, § 93, subd. [j]). This; court held that the judgment of the plaintiff was dischargedl in bankruptcy. [See 301 N. Y. 715.]