Case ID: so2d_687/html/0367-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anthony PARRISH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 97-0116.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Feb. 12, 1997.
    Anthony Parrish, Immokalee, pro se.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Based on the reasoning of our recent opinion in Freeman v. State, 679 So.2d 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), we affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion but again certify to the supreme court the same question certified in Freeman:

IS STATE v. GRAY, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla.1995), RETROACTIVE?

DELL, PARIENTE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.