Case ID: so2d_291/html/0246-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HOBSON, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Willie Lee MOORE and Mary Moore, his wife, Appellants, v. R. Huston BABCOCK and Employers Commercial Union Insurance Company, Appellees.
    No. 72-1062.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 6, 1974.
    I. W. Williams of Minnis, Williams & Milton, St. Petersburg, for appellants.
    Richard E. Wolverton of Ramseur, Bradham, Lyle, Skipper & Cramer, St. Pe-tersburg, for appellees.
   HOBSON, Judge.

This cause is a companion with Moore v. School Board of Pinellas County et al., 291 So.2d 244.

Appellants appeal a summary final judgment entered in favor of appellees. We have examined the record on appeal and find that the appellees have satisfied the requirements of Holl v. Talcott, Fla.1966, 191 So.2d 40, as to their entitlement to a summary judgment in this malpractice action. We are mindful of the factors dictating caution in the use of summary judgments, particularly prevailing in this type of negligence action; however, from this record we find that all requirements under Holl, supra, have been met.

Therefore, the summary judgment is

Affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.