Case ID: ohio-law-abs_7/html/0703-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MARSHALL, CJ.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GEORGE AST CANDY CO v KLING
    Ohio Supreme Court
    No. 21657.
    Decided Nov. 20, 1929
   Syllabus by

MARSHALL, CJ.

AUTOMOBILES

(50 Re) Section 6310-28a GC, does not confer an absolute and unqualified right of way upon the driver of a motor “vehicle approaching from the right,” neither does it excuse the driver of such vehicle from the common law duty to exercise ordinary care. Heidle v. Baldwin, 118 Ohio St., 375, approved and followed.

Kinkade, Robinson, Matthias and Allen, JJ., concur.

Robinson and Day, JJ., dissent.