Case ID: so2d_643/html/0110-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Donald M. THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 94-02835.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Oct. 7, 1994.
   PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s order granting in part and denying in part the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed. We note, however, that the trial court’s order incorrectly provides that the sentence in 88-15445 runs consecutive to the sentences in 89-20911 and 89-20913. The written plea agreements and sentences attached to the order reflect that all sentences are to run concurrent with each other.

Affirmed.

RYDER, A.C.J., and PARKER and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.