Case ID: sw2d_886/html/0114-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ernestine HAFERKAMP, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 65462.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Aug. 30, 1994.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 19, 1994.
    Application to Transfer Denied Nov. 22, 1994.
    David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John R. Watson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Ernestine Haferkamp, appeals from the St. Louis County Circuit Court’s denial of her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of the circuit court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s judgment pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.