Case ID: sw3d_113/html/0685-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Chad W. JONES, Complete Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 82168.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Sept. 2, 2003.
    Ruth B. Sanders, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck Burgess, for respondent.
    Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., J. Lawrence E. Mooney, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Chad W. Jones, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. He contends the motion court clearly erred in finding his claim for jail time credit was not cognizable.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).