Case ID: us_308/html/0514-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      \n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 468.
    Roedenbeck Farms, Inc., et al. v. Broussard et al.
    November 6, 1939.
    
      Mr. John H. Crooker for appellants. Messrs. E. B. Pickett, E. E. Easterling, and Will E. Orgain for appellees. 
      Messrs. William D. Gordon and E. E. Easterling for Marrs McLean, appellee.
   Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. McGrew, 188 U.S. 291, 308; Zadig v. Baldwin, 166 U. S. 485, 488; Home for Incurables v. City of New York, 187 U. S. 155, 158; (2) Roberts v. City of New York, 295 U. S. 264, 278; Seattle Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 U. S. 568, 570; Cross Lake Shooting & Fishing Club v. Louisiana, 224 U. S. 632, 638; Ross v. Oregon, 227 U. S. 150, 162.