Case ID: f-appx_74/html/0830-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel GARCIA-GAMEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-10220.
    D.C. No. CR-01-00699-JMR.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 8, 2003.
    
    Decided Sept. 15, 2003.
    Christina M. Cabanillas, Lynnette C. Kimmins, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Enrique R. Gonzales, Nogales, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before PREGERSON, THOMAS and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Manuel Garcia-Gamez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sentence for unlawful reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 886 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Garcia-Gamez has filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. GarciaGamez has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no further issues for review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.