Case ID: nys_127/html/1145-13.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SOSINSKI, Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNKIRK, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court. Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    February 1, 1911.)
    Action by Stella Sosinski against the City of Dunkirk.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Seld, that the questions of negligence and contributory negligence, under the evidence, were for the jury, and should not be determined by the court.

McLennan, P. J.. and ROBSON, J., dissent, upon the ground that the evidence fails to establish negligence on the part of the defendant.