Case ID: nj_186/html/0157-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

892 A.2d 680
    IN THE MATTER OF HOWARD A. GROSS, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 035181992).
    March 9, 2006.
   ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 05-216, concluding that HOWARD A. GROSS of CAMDEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 7.3(d) (giving of something of value to a non-lawyer in exchange for the procurement of clients);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having concluded on the basis of the passage of time since the last act of unethical conduct that the term of suspension should be suspended;

And HOWARD A. GROSS having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that HOWARD A. GROSS is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months; and it is further

ORDERED that the term of suspension is hereby suspended; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.