Case ID: njl_111/html/0237-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ARTHUR ALLORD, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. THE HENRY MUHS COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
    Submitted May 27, 1933
    Decided September 27, 1933.
    For the petitioner-respondent, W. Reading Gebhardt.
    
    For the respondent-appellant, Cox & Wdlburg (Harry F. Wdlburg and Arthur F. Mead, of counsel).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Hone.