Case ID: ad2d_187/html/1019-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority, Appellant-Respondent, v Hartford Insurance Company et al., Respondents-Appellants.
   Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The court properly denied the motion and cross motion for summary judgment as premature. Whether coverage B of the insurance policy at issue applies at all depends upon the resolution of questions of fact in the Federal action (see generally, New York Pub. Interest Research Group v Carey, 42 NY2d 527, 531; Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 91 AD2d 317, 325-326). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Lawton, Boehm and Doerr, JJ.