Case ID: sw3d_508/html/0171-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carlos BLUE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    ED 103686
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: November 29, 2016
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 19, 2017
    Muhlenkamp & Bernsen Attorneys at Law, L.L.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before Robert M. Clayton III, P. J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carlos Blue (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).