Case ID: ind_6/html/0055-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Stuart, J. \n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hord v. The Corporation of Noblesville.
    
      Monday, December 18.
    A party after moving in arrest of judgment can not move for a new trial.
    APPEAL from the Hamilton Court of Common Pleas.
    
      W. Garver, for the appellant.
    
      D. C. Chipman and J. Robinson, for the appellee.
   Stuart, J.

This was a proceeding before the mayor for a violation of one of the ordinances or by-laws of the town; and was appealed to the Common Pleas. Trial by jury, and fine of 5 dollars.

Here, as in many other cases decided lately, none of the evidence is in the record. The defendant also supersedes his motion for a new trial by first moving in arrest of judgment. Bepley v. The State, 4 Ind. 264.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.