Case ID: so2d_808/html/1234-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "McMILLAN, Presiding Judge. SHAW, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles Malcom HENDERSON v. STATE.
    CR-00-0750.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    May 25, 2001.
    Rehearing Denied Aug. 10, 2001.
    Charles Malcom Henderson, pro se.
    Bill Pryor, atty. gen., and Joseph G.L. Marston III, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.
   McMILLAN, Presiding Judge.

AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

COBB and WISE, JJ, concur. BASCHAB, J, concurs in the result. SHAW, J, concurs in the result, with opinion.

SHAW, Judge,

concurring in the result.

I adhere to the views I expressed in my special writing in Casey v. State, [Ms. CR-98-1661, March 16, 2001] — So.2d - (Ala.Crim.App.2001); therefore, I disagree with the statement in this Court’s unpublished memorandum quoted from the main opinion in Casey that a full pardon ‘is irrelevant for purposes of considering pri- or convictions for sentence enhancement purposes.’ ” Otherwise, I concur.