Case ID: tex-crim_85/html/0534-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "LATTIMORE, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

C. D. Rogers v. The State.
    No. 5457.
    Decided June 25, 1919.
    Theft—Practice on Appeal.
    Where the indictment is sufficient and no fundamental error appears in the charge of the court, the matter of complaint of the insufficiency of the evidence cannot he considered on appeal, in the absence of a statement of facts and bills of exception.
    Appeal from the Criminal District Court of Harris. Tried below before the Hon. C. W. Robinson.
    Appeal from a conviction of theft over the value of fifty dollars; penalty, two years imprisonment in the penitentiary.
    The opinion states the case.
    No brief on file for appellant.
    
      E. A. Berry, Assistant Attorney General, for the' State.
   LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of theft of property of the value of more than fifty dollars in the Criminal District Court of Harris County, and his punishment fixed by the jury at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

An inspection of the record discloses that there is no statement of facts and no bills of exception, and we have fully considered the matters raised on the motion for a new trial. The indictment appears to sufficiently charge the offense, and no fundamental errors appear in the charge of the court. The matters of complaint of the insufficiency of the evidence as presented in the motion for a new trial cannot be considered by us in the absence of the statement of facts.

No reversible -error appearing, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

Affirmed.