Case ID: so2d_636/html/0181-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "W. SHARP, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kenny Layne HILLMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 93-1677.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    April 29, 1994.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and James T. Cook, Asst. Public Defender, Day-tona Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Asst. Atty, Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
   W. SHARP, Judge.

Hillman appeals a special condition of his three-year probationary sentence, after he pled nolo contendere to burglary of a structure. Hillman argues the trial court erred in setting a provision which requires restitution to be payable at a rate determined by his probation officer. We reverse because this court has held that it is improper for anyone other than a judge to set a payment schedule for amounts owed in restitution. Casto v. State, 615 So.2d 792 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Boss v. State, 613 So.2d 525 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court to set a payout rate on the restitution.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur. 
      
      . Section 810.02(3), Fla.Stat. (1989)