Case ID: ga-app_33/html/0354-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

15979.
    Estroff v. Gillis.
    Decided January 15, 1925.
    Complaint; from city court oí Soperton—Judge O. J. Franklin presiding. September 15, 1924.
    
      E. J. Giles, Sajfold & Sharpe, for plaintiff: in error.
    
      Dallam R. Jacicson, N. L. Gillis, George B. Davis, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

Under all the particular facts of the case, and the rulings of this court when it was here before (31 Ga. App. 501, 121 S. E. 339), it can not be held as a matter of law that the trial judge abused his discretion in granting a new trial, although it was the second grant thereof to the same party, and the motion for a new trial was based upon the usual general grounds only; the first new trial being granted because of an erroneous charge by the court.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.