Case ID: scl_1/html/0173-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Tot. Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Breen against Ingram.
    jjo obligation i°te?al tíiing, as the^btatuie makes only naj negotiable"
    CASE on attachment. This suit was brought upon an agreement from William M-Iniosh, of Georgia, dated 11th December, 1/85, to Thomas Washington, by which he engaged to deliver Washington, or order, Richard Call’s bond for 315/. sterling. This agreement was afterwards negó-dated to the plaintiff Breen, who attached the property of M-hitosh in the defendant luganos hands, to pay this 315/. But resolved per
    
   Tot. Curiam.

This is only a covenant to do a collateral act, although said to be delivered to order, and not a negotiable note under the statute of Anne, which makes notes payable for money only, negotiable. 2 Burr. 764. Esp. 31. 1 Str. 609. 2 Sir. 1151. 1273.