Case ID: mcgrath_1/html/0096-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROSENBERG ET AL. vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Clinton),
    No. 14835½.
   To compel the dismissal of a case commenced by attachment, where both plaintiffs and defendants are non-residents of the State.

Denied April 16, 1895.

Certain property was attached in Clinton County, but relators insist that when the debtor is a non-resident, the creditor must be a resident of the State.

Citing, Black on Judgments, Sec. 904; Moore vs. Circuit Judge, 55 M., 84 (620); Pennoyer vs. Neff, 95, U. S., 565; Freeman vs. Alderson, 119 U. S., 185; Towle vs. Wilder, 57 Vt., 622; Great Western Ry. Co. vs. Miller, 19 M., 305; Jacobson vs. Circuit Judge, 76 M., 234 (14). See No. 342.