Case ID: so3d_130/html/0713-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WALLACE, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Victor MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 2D12-6339.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Nov. 27, 2013.
    Victor Miller, pro se.
   WALLACE, Judge.

We affirm the postconviction court’s denial of Victor Miller’s motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) because Mr. Miller did not demonstrate where in the record it can be shown that he is entitled to relief. See Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045, 1051 n. 2 (Fla. 2011). However, our affirmance is without prejudice for Mr. Miller to file a facially sufficient motion.

Although we affirm the denial of Mr. Miller’s motion, we note that constructive possession of a firearm cannot support the imposition of a minimum mandatory sentence enhancement under sections 775.087(1)-(2), Florida Statutes (2000). See Irons v. State, 851 So.2d 798, 798 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

Affirmed without prejudice.

SILBERMAN and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.