Case ID: f2d_158/html/0677-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. CUTLER et al.
    No. 4204.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
    Jan. 3, 1947.
    Arnold Ordman, of Washington, D. C. (Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Gen. Counsel, Morris P. Glushien, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Thomas B. Sweeney, all of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for petitioner.
    Julius Kirle, of Boston, Mass., for respondent Oscar Cutler.
    Before MAHONEY and WOODBURY, Circuit Judges, and FORD, District Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

Since the respondents in this case urged no objections at any stage of the proceedings before the Board, and since no “extraordinary circumstances” are suggested to excuse their failure or neglect to do so, they cannot now object to a decree enforcing the Board’s order. See § 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 454, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e); National Labor Relations Board v. Cheney California Lumber Co., 327 U.S. 385, 388, 389, 66 S.Ct. 553, and eases cited. Moreover an examination of the record discloses that the Board’s order is supported by substantial evidence.

A decree will be entered enforcing the order of the Board.