Case ID: f-appx_305/html/0986-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Quinton D. RAINEY, a/k/a Q, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 08-7259.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 18, 2008.
    Decided: Jan. 9, 2009.
    Quinton D. Rainey, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, Office of the United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Quinton D. Rainey appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rainey, No. 4:94-cr-00069-RBS-l (E.D. Va. May 21, 2008; July 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.