Case ID: njl_116/html/0506-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CITY OF LONG BRANCH, PROSECUTOR-RESPONDENT, v. STATE BOARD OF TAX APPEALS ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS; BOROUGH OF ALLENHURST AND INTERLAKEN, APPELLANTS.
    Submitted February 14, 1936 —
    Decided May 14, 1936.
    For the appellant borough of Allenhurst, Richard W. Stout.
    
    For the appellant borough of Interlaken, Isaiah Matlack (Frank A. Boettner, Jules F. Tepper and William J. O’Hagan, of counsel).
    For the respondent city of Long Branch, Jacob Steinbach, Jr.
    
    For the respondent borough of Deal, T. Cyril Butler.
    
    For the respondent township of Dover, Ocean county, David A. Veeder.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review, in this ease, is reversed, for the reasons stated in Town of West Orange et al. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 115 N. J. L. 396; 180 Atl. Rep. 770, and affirmed by this court in 116 N. J. L. 414.

For affirmance — None.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 12.