Case ID: so2d_833/html/0857-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The STATE of Florida, FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL, Appellant, v. James CHANCELOR; [In re: The Forfeiture of: Twenty Nine Thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty ($29,980.00) in U.S. Currency], Appellee.
    No. 3D02-1211.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 26, 2002.
    Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, and Paulette R. Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.
    Stanley Jay Bartel, Miami, for appellee.
    Before LEVY, SHEVIN and RAMIREZ, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Wackenhut Protective Sys., Inc. v. Key Biscayne Commodore Club Condo. I, Inc., 350 So.2d 1150, 1151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)(“Florida case law applies a test of prejudice to the defendant as the primary consideration in determining whether the plaintiffs motion to amend should be granted or denied.”). See also San Martin v. Dadeland Dodge, Inc., 508 So.2d 497 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).