Case ID: f-appx_61/html/0097-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Laron A. MOTEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN OF THE AUGUSTA CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 03-6085.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted April 7, 2003.
    Decided April 17, 2003.
    Laron A. Moten, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Laron A. Moten, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000); see Miller El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moten has not satisfied this standard. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED. 
      
       Moten does not challenge on appeal the district court’s dismissal of two claims in a prior order for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or the court’s dismissal of one claim on procedural default grounds. Moten has waived appellate review of these claims by failing to raise them in his informal brief. 4th Cir. R. 34(b).