Case ID: so2d_600/html/0043-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Penny PELLITO and James Pellito, her husband, Appellants/Cross Appellees, v. HOME DEPOT, INC., Appellee/Cross Appellant.
    No. 91-1414.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    June 17, 1992.
    Ellis S. Rubin and Eric J. Miller of Rubin, Rubin & Rubin, P.A., Miami, for appellants-cross appellees.
    Shelley H. Leinicke of Wicker, Smith, Tutan, O’Hara, McCoy, Graham & Lane, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee-cross appellant.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Although the rulings of the trial court at trial and on the motion for new trial were not necessarily those which this panel may have made, we cannot conclude that the rulings constituted an abuse of judicial discretion or reversible error. Ford Motor Co. v. Kikis, 401 So.2d 1341 (Fla.1981).

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.