Case ID: f-appx_600/html/0124-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHONG SU YI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAPITAL ONE N.A., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 15-1015.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 16, 2015.
    Decided: April 21, 2015.
    
      Chong Su Yi, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Allen Fitzgerald, McGuirewoods, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit' Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chong Su Yi appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yi v. Capital One N.A., No. 8:14-cv-03828-GJH (D.Md. Dec. 19, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.