Case ID: so2d_207/html/0282-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FRANK RENNOLDS & ASSOCIATES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Scott KELLY and Michael Sisson, d/b/a Michael Sisson Organization, Appellees.
    No. 67-427.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    Feb. 13, 1968.
    Swink & Swink, Miami, for appellant.
    Pallot, Silver, Pallot, Stern & Proby, Miami, for appellee Scott Kelly.
    Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the action of the trial judge in dismissing the amended complaint with prejudice. It sought recovery on a purported advertising contract involving a campaign for political office.

The contract sued upon was not executed by a campaign treasurer or deputy campaign treasurer, in accordance with § 99.161(4) (a) (5) (6), Fla.Stat. (1965), F.S.A. Therefore, the trial judge was eminently correct under the authority of Schaal v. Race, Fla.App.1961, 135 So.2d 252.

Affirmed.