Case ID: sw3d_70/html/0577-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert E. MEYER, Appellant, v. OAK BLUFF PARTNERS, INC., Respondents.
    No. ED 79541.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Feb. 5, 2002.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 25, 2002.
    Richard A. Wunderlich, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Barry S. Ginsburg, Clayton, MO, for respondent.
    Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert E. Meyer (“Meyer”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his motion for attorneys’ fees for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).