Case ID: ad_268/html/0967-10.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Louis Eng, Respondent, v. Edward C. Tom et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
   — Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, J J.; Untermyer, J., concurs in the affirmance of the judgment on the ground that the statement complained of was made in the presence of the defendant Barber and that the jury could infer from his failure to deny it an admission of its accuracy. [See post, pp. 1027, 1039.]