Case ID: ohio-st-3d_134/html/0379-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Beyer et al., Appellees and Cross-Appellants v. Rieter Automotive North American, Inc., Appellant and Cross-Appellee, et al.
    [Cite as Beyer v. Rieter Automotive N. Am., Inc., 134 Ohio St.3d 379, 2012-Ohio-5627.]
    (No. 2012-1283
    Submitted December 4, 2012
    Decided December 5, 2012.)
    Spitler & Williams-Young Co., L.P.A., Marc G. Williams-Young, and Elaine B. Szuch, for appellees and cross-appellants, Thomas H. Beyer and Sherry Beyer.
    Weston Hurd, L.L.P., Shawn W. Maestle, and Jeffrey L. Tasse, for appellant and cross-appellee.
   {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal and cross-appeal are accepted. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Hewitt v. L.E. Myers, 134 Ohio St.3d 199, 2012-Ohio-5317, 981 N.E.2d 795, and judgment is entered in favor of Rieter Automotive North American, Inc.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.