Case ID: so2d_87/html/0811-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William Stanley MILES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Supreme Court of Florida. Division B.
    May 30, 1956.
    John R. Tamm, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
    Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and David U. Tumin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the Rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that skid motion is appropriate and seasonably máde and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.