Case ID: or_246/html/0407-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued October 31, 1966,
    reversed March 29, 1967
    STATE ex rel BARKER, Appellant, v. SHOLES, Defendant-Respondent, and PHILLIPS et ux, Intervenors-Respondents.
    
    425 P. 2d 754
    
      Howard R. Lonergan, Portland, argued the cause and filed briefs for the appellant.
    No appearance was made for defendant-respondent.
    George P. Winslow, Tillamook, filed a brief for intervenors-respondents.
    Before McAllistee, Chief Justice, and Peeey, Sloan, O’Connell, Goodwin, Denecke and Holman, Justices.
    
      
       Holman, J., did not participate in the decision of this case.
    
   PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff Eoland Barker was arrested in Deschutes county upon a bench warrant issued out of the circuit court for Tillamook county. He then filed a petition in habeas corpus in the circuit court for Deschutes county which contested the jurisdiction of the circuit court for Tillamook county to issue the order upon which the warrant was issued. The trial court affirmed the jurisdiction of the circuit court for Tillamook county.

Since this proceeding grows out of the proceedings discussed in Phillips v. Barker, 244 Or 513, 419 P2d 15, wherein we held that the circuit court of Tillamook county was without jurisdiction of the suit, the judgment is reversed with instructions to discharge the defendant and exonerate his bail.