Case ID: sw2d_890/html/0388-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Walter PAIGE, Jr., Defendant/Appellant.
    No. 63951.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Jan. 3, 1995.
    Daniel P. Reardon, Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and CRAHAN, J.
   PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Defendant appeals following his convictions by a jury of second degree murder, § 565.021 RSMol986, and armed criminal action, § 571.015 RSMol986. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in refusing to submit an instruction on self-defense. We find no error. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).