Case ID: f-appx_14/html/0239-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Thomas W. HILL, Petitioner.
    No. 01-1733.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted July 12, 2001.
    Decided July 26, 2001.
    Thomas W. Hill, petitioner pro se.
    Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL and DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Thomas W. Hill filed this mandamus petition seeking to compel the district court to exercise its jurisdiction over his recently dismissed complaint. Where there is another available remedy, mandamus relief is not available. In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Mandamus relief is not a substitute for appeal. In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.1979). Because we conclude Hill has other adequate remedies, we deny Hill’s petition for mandamus relief.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.