Case ID: ohio-st_172/html/0340-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Baker v. Sacks, Warden.
    (No. 36913
    Decided June 14, 1961.)
    
      Mr. James N. Baker, in propria persona.
    
    
      Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, and Mr. Aubrey A. Wendt, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Habeas corpus cannot be used to review alleged irregularities in the resentencing of an accused by a court of competent jurisdiction. Ex parte Shaw, 7 Ohio St., 81; Ex parte Hagan, 25 Ohio St., 426.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Bell, Radcliee and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.