Case ID: f-appx_174/html/0380-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF ARIZONA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Neale E. SMITH, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 06-15059.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 6, 2006.
    
    Filed March 10, 2006.
    Barbara E. La Wall, Esq., Pima County Attorney’s Office, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Neale E. Smith, Tucson, AZ, pro se.
    Before: BEEZER, T.G. NELSON and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Upon review of the record and appellant’s response to this court’s February 9, 2006 order to show cause, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court’s order remanding the action to state court. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affir-mance appropriate where result is clear from face of record).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.