Case ID: so2d_528/html/0127-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Norman WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 87-1228.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 19, 1988.
    Norman Williams, in pro per.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before HUBBART, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s written order finding that the defendant violated condition number 10 of probation by failing to pay the cost of supervision does not conform to the court’s oral finding. Therefore, the trial court is directed to modify the written order by striking this finding. Roberts v. State, 512 So.2d 286 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). As modified, the order is

Affirmed.