Case ID: or_249/html/0291-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued February 23,
    Attorney General’s Ballot Title affirmed February 28, 1968
    FADELEY, Petitioner, v. THORNTON et al, Respondents.
    
    437 P. 2d 750
    
      Edward N. Fadeley, Eugene, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
    
      Louis S. Bowney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, Salem.
    Before Perry, Chief Justice, and McAllister, Sloan, O’Connell, Goodwin, Denegke and Holman, Justices.
   PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, being dissatisfied with the ballot title prepared by the attorney general for an initiative measure filed with the Secretary of State, has appealed.

His argument on appeal is that the title as prepared violates the spirit of ORS 254.070.

We have carefully examined the ballot title prepared by the attorney general and are of the opinion that the title as prepared is in compliance with the statutes.

The attorney general’s ballot title is affirmed.