Case ID: so2d_541/html/0794-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MEAD EMBALLAGE, S.A., Appellant, v. Sean BERNSTEIN, Appellee.
    No. 89-598.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 25, 1989.
    Blackwell, Walker, Fascell & Hoehl and Douglas H. Stein, Miami, for appellant.
    Hessen, Schimmel & DeCastro and Arnold D. Hessen, Joel V. Lumer, Miami, for appellee.
    Before HUBBART, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Asahi Metal Indus. Co. v. Superior Court, 480 U.S. 102, 107 S.Ct. 1026, 94 L.Ed.2d 92 (1987); World Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 100 S.Ct. 559, 62 L.Ed.2d 490 (1980); Ford Motor Co. v. Atwood Vacuum Mach. Co., 392 So.2d 1305 (Fla.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 901, 101 S.Ct. 3024, 69 L.Ed.2d 401 (1981); Life Labs., Inc. v. Valdes, 387 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).