Case ID: so2d_914/html/1005-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

M.D.M., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
    No. 3D04-2247.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 2, 2005.
    Joseph M. Albury, for appellant.
    Calianne P. Lantz, for appellee.
    Before GERSTEN and GREEN, JJ. and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment terminating the appellant’s parental rights because it is supported by competent, substantial evidence. § 39.802, .806(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2005); V.G. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 813 So.2d 298 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). M.A. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 814 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)(failure to visit; express concern for child or pay support warranted termination); In re R.V.F., 437 So.2d 713 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)(same).

Affirmed.