Case ID: cust-ct_57/html/0797-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Landis, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. P66/166. —
    No. P66/167. —
    No. P66/168. —
    No. P66/169. —
    China Dry Goods Co. and Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. v. United States, protests 330184-K and 59/25667 (San Francisco). United China & Glass Company v. United States, protests 58/715, etc. (Houston). Ucagco, Inc. v. United States, protests 63/937, 59/ 15773, and 60/16355 (Boston). New York Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United States, protest 64/20170 (Portland, Oreg.).
   Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of W. Kay Company, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.