Case ID: sw2d_807/html/0224-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Walter JONES, Defendant/Appellant.
    Nos. 57844, 59125.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    April 23, 1991.
    Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, for defendant/ appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Joseph P. Murray, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of burglary, § 569.160, RSMo 1986, and stealing property of at least $150 in value, § 580.030, RSMo 1986, and the dismissal of his Rule 29.15 motion for failure to file within the mandatory time limits.

The judgments are based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).