Case ID: okla_122/html/0094-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PHELPS, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ST. LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO. v. LONG, County Assessor, et al.
    No. 17899
    — Opinion Filed Dec. 7, 1926.
    Error from District Court, Lincoln County ; Hal Johnson, Judge.
    Action by St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company against Ora Long, as County Assessor. and Paul Prince, as County Treasurer, of Lincoln County. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Stuart, Cruce & Franklin, Andrews & Andrews, and E. T. Miller, for plaintiff in error.
    Roscoe Cox, Co. Atty., and Erwin & Erwin, for defendants in error.
   PHELPS, J.

This action was filed by the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company against Ora Long, county assessor, and Paul Prince, county treasurer, of Lincoln county, in the district court of Lincoln county, for an injunction under the provisions of State Question No. 141, Initiative Petition No. 92, adopted by a vote of the people at the regular primary election on August 3, 1926. The defendants filed their answer, challenging the constitutionality of such measure, which contention was by the court sustained and the cause dismissed, from which judgment the plaintiff appeals.

The questions involved in this case are identical with the questions involved in cause No. 17907, Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Ora Long, County Assessor, et al... opinion in which was this day filed, 122 Oisla. 86, 251 Pac. 486. and upon the authorities therein cited we reach the same conclusion 'in this case as we reached in that, and the opinion, conclusions, and syllabus in that case are hereby adopted and applied tu this case.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

BRANSON, V. C. J„ and MASON, HAR BISON, and CLARK, JJ., concur. NIOHOL SON, O J., and LESTER, J., concur in con (fusion. HUNT and RILEY, JJ., dissent.