Case ID: sw3d_540/html/0427-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DeAngelo WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 105775
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    FILED: February 20, 2018
    Casey A. Taylor, 1000 Wet Nifong, Bldg 7, Suite 100, Saint Louis, MO. 65203, for appellant.
    Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.
    Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

DeAngelo Wilson ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 amended motion for post-conviction relief. Movant argues the motion court erred in denying his motion without an evidentiary hearing because there was an insufficient factual basis to support his guilty plea for second-degree domestic assault. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). 
      
      All rule references are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2016), unless otherwise indicated.