Case ID: njl_71/html/0682-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE WEST SHORE RAILROAD COMPANY, DEPENDANT IN ERROR, v. C. WILLIAM WENNER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued November 30, 1904
    Decided March 6, 1905.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiff in error, John Grvffin (Hudspeth & Porter, on the brief).
    For the defendant in error, Vredenburgh, Wall & Van Winlcle.
    
   Per Curiam.

The questions of law involved in this case were all disposed of in the opinion of Mr. Justice Dixon when the case was formerly before us. 41 Vroom 233.

The evidence of King justified the finding of the trial judge that there was no consent to any assignment of the lease, or any sub-letting such as would prevent a forfeiture.

The judgment must therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Eort, Garretson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert; Vre-DENBURGH, VROOM, GREEN. 11.

For reversal — None.