Case ID: f2d_200/html/0560-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles J. KOHLHOFER, Appellant, v. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee.
    No. 11604.
    United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
    Dec. 12, 1952.
    Manuel Zimmerman, Toledo, Ohio, for appellant.
    Joel Rhinefort, Toledo, Ohio, for appel-lee.
    Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

This case having been considered on the record, briefs and oral arguments of counsel for respective parties;

And the Court being of the opinion that considering the testimony in the list most favorable to the appellant, it was not error for the District Judge to direct a verdict for the appellee; Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R. Company v. Rohrs, 114 Ohio St. 493, 151 N.E. 714; Woodworth, Admx. v. New York Central R. Company, 149 Ohio St. 543, 80 N.E.2d 142; Baltimore & Ohio R. Company v. Joseph, 6 Cir., 112 F.2d 518, certiorari denied 312 U.S. 682, 61 S.Ct. 551, 85 L.Ed. 1121, rehearing denied 312 U.S. 714, 61 S.Ct. 710, 85 L.Ed. 1144; Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R. Company v. Yeley, 6 Cir., 165 F.2d 375,

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed.