Case ID: nj-super_128/html/0198-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

S. C., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. A. C., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
    Argued April 23, 1974
    Decided May 3, 1974.
    Before Judges Carton, Loea and Seidman.
    
      Mr. Monroe Ackerman argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Rudd and Ackerman, attorneys; Mr. Charles E. Carlson, Jr. on the brief).
    
      Mr. Everett M. Scherer argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Riker, Danzig, Scherer and Brown, attorneys; Mr. Thomas C. C. Humick on the brief).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the written opinion of Judge Consodine reported at 123 N. J. Super. 566 (Ch. Div. 1973).