Case ID: ad_265/html/0975-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Boyd H. Wood Company, Respondent, v. Raymond Horgan, Appellant.
   (See Kirshenbaum, v. General Outdoor Adv. Co., 258 N. Y. 489.) Lazansky, P. J., Adel and Close, JJ., concur; Carswell and Johnston, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order of the Appellate Term and the judgment of the Municipal Court, and to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the waiver of section 230, Real Property Law, is contrary to public policy. [178 Misc. 385.]