Case ID: f-appx_294/html/0791-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re: Noah SMITH, III, Petitioner.
    No. 07-2147.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 9, 2008.
    Decided: Sept. 26, 2008.
    Noah Smith, III, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied as moot by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Noah Smith, III, petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that Smith voluntarily withdrew his § 2255 motion on August 22, 2008. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED AS MOOT.