Case ID: so2d_532/html/0084-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Vicente RANGEL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 88-167.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 18, 1988.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Thomas G. Murray, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Joni B. Braunstein, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The state concedes, and we agree, that the trial court erred in imposing a sentence in excess of the guidelines without providing written reasons. State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985); e.g., Foster v. State, 491 So.2d 328 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). We therefore vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing within the guidelines. Dougfield v. State, 529 So.2d 823 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Contra Waldron v. State, 529 So.2d 772 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) (en banc). See also Brumley v. State, 520 So.2d 275 (Fla.1988); Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987); Harris v. State, 520 So.2d 688 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

VACATED AND REMANDED.