Case ID: nj-eq_65/html/0764-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Emil Schultz, Jr., et al., respondents, v. Howard J. Van Doren et al., appellants.
    [Filed August 25th, 1903.]
    
      Mr. Robert E. McCarter, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. Edward A. Day, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from in this case is affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, filed in the court of chancery, and reported in 19 Dick. Ch. Rep. 465.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syokel, Dixon, Garrison, Port, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Voori-iees, Vroom, Green- — 13.

For reversal — None.