Case ID: sc_257/html/0068-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam :", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

19002
    The STATE, Respondent, v. Vance Alexander CURLEY and James Pearson, Appellants.
    (184 S. E. (2d) 80)
    Messrs. Dusenbury & Dusenbury, of Florence for appellants.
    Messrs. Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen., and Emmett H. Clair and Robert H. Hood, Asst. Attys. Gen. of Columbia, and Solicitqr T. Kenneth Summerford, of Florence, for respondent.
    October 20, 1971.
   ORDER

Per Curiam :

It having been determined by the Circuit Court, after an evidentiary hearing conforming with the judgment of this Court heretofore filed (253 S. C. 513, 171 S. E. (2d) 699), that the appellant, Pearson, after receiving the benefit of the procedural safeguards required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. (2d) 694, with respect to the evidence admitted against him, voluntarily and intelligently waived his privilege against self-incrimination, said appellant’s conviction is, therefore, affirmed.