Case ID: sw3d_113/html/0244-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John Louis Gerard RAAF, Appellant, v. ST. LOUIS POLICE DEPT., et al., Respondents.
    No. ED 82256.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Aug. 19, 2003.
    John Louis Gerard Raaf, Kirkwood, pro se.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David F. Barrett, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before GLENN A NORTON, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and Mary K. Hoff, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Louis Gerard Raaf appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his Petitions for Expungement.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).