Case ID: ad_269/html/0948-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Leona Morrison et al., Respondents, v. Albert W. Lloyd, Appellant. Albert W. Lloyd, Plaintiff, v. Henne F. Mead et al., Defendants.
   Cross actions to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage as a consequence of the collision, in a street intersection, of an automobile operated by plaintiff Morrison andi owned by plaintiff Mead, with a truck owned and operated by defendant Lloyd. Judgment in favor of plaintiffs Morrison and. Mead, entered on the verdict of a jury, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The court did not err in its charge. Neither car was in the intersection or so near as to render it likely that a collision would occur” on either version of the incident (Shea v. Judson, 283 N. Y. 393). In any event, if error there was, it was not prejudicial. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 106.) Present— Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ.