Case ID: sw2d_865/html/0445-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

P.A.C.T. and James McKenna, Appellants, v. Rudy NAIL, Defendant.
    No. 63716.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Nov. 23, 1993.
    John J. MeMullin, Dan M. Czamanske, Brown & James, P.C., St. Louis, for appellants.
    Craig A. Smith, Suelthaus & Kaplan, P.C., St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before GRIMM, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ.
   ORDER

Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims for money owed by defendant.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).