Case ID: pa_416/html/0559-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Shelburne Sportswear, Inc. v. Philadelphia, Appellant.
    Argued November 17, 1964.
    March 16, 1965:
    Before Bell, C. J., Musmanno, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.
    
      Levy Anderson, First Deputy City Solicitor, with him Gerald Gornish, Assistant City Solicitor, Matthew W. Bulloch, Jr., Deputy City Solicitor, and Edward G. Bauer, Jr., City Solicitor, for City of Philadelphia, appellant.
    
      Richard B. Mails, with him Malls, Malls é Malls, for appellee.
   Opinion

Per Curiam,

An examination of the record in this appeal indicates that the amount in controversy is such that this court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. As in Kungsgaten, Inc. v. Phila., 416 Pa. 352, 206 A. 2d 8 (1965), this appeal under our Rule 68-1/2, was improvidently permitted, and the case must be remitted to the Superior Court.

The matter is remitted to the Superior Court.