Case ID: okla_178/html/0227-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MORTON v. BAKER.
    No. 27102.
    Nov. 17, 1936.
    Geo. C. Beidleman, Henry M. Beidleman, and Thomas J. Farrar, for plaintiffs in error.
    T. F. Shackleford, Co.chran & Noble, and John L. Norman, for defendant in error.
   PER CURIAM.

A motion to dismiss has been filed because the plaintiffs in error failed to give notice in open court either at the time the judgment was rendered or within 10 days thereafter of intention to appeal -to the Supreme Court and the record not affirmatively showing such notice was given. A response was called for under date of July 27, 1936, but the same has not been complied with. In the case of French v. Bragg, 177 Okla. 43, 5 P. (2d) 953 we said:

“Where the defendant in error has filed a motion to dismiss upon jurisdictional grounds, and this court has ordered the plaintiff in error to respond thereto and no response lias been filed, it is not the duty of this court to inquire further into the jurisdiction where the authorities cited by the movant reasonably sustain the lack of jurisdiction.”

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

MeNEILL, O. X, OSBORN, V. O. X, and BUSBY, WELCH, PHELPS, CORN, and GIBSON, XL, concur. RILEY and BAY-LESS, JX, absent.