Case ID: okla_89/html/0232-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PALMER et al. v. MURRAY et al.
    No. 12429
    Opinion Filed May 8, 1923.
    (Syllabus. 1
    Appeal and Error — Case-Made—Filing Below — Necessity.
    A case-made filed in this court which does not show that it has been filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court is a nullity, and where such a case-made remains in this court after the expiration of the statutory time in which to perfect an appeal, on motion, the appeal will be dismissed.
    Error from District Court, Atoka County; J. H. Linebaugh, Judge.
    Action between Wilson and Elias Palmer, minors, by their guardian, Watson Palmer, and J. I. Murray and Peter Homer. Prom the judgment; the foymer bring error.
    Dismissed.
    I. O. Correll, for plaintiffs in error.
    George Trice and J. G. Ralls, for defendants .in error.
   PER CURIAM.

Came on to be heard in the above-entitled and numbered cause defendants in error’s motion to dismiss the appeal herein, upon the grounds that the pe-' tition in error does not have attached to it any case-made or certified transcript of the record that was filed in the office of the court clerk of the district court of Atoka county where said cause was originally tried.

The record discloses that the above cause was tried and judgment rendered on the 7th day of January, 1921, in said district court of Atoka county, and that more than six months have expired since rendition of the judgment therein, and that no petition in error with copy of case-made or duly certified copy of the transcript, as required by law, has been filed in this court.

Record discloses that the purported case-made was never filed- in the trial court. It, therefore, follows that the motion to dismiss is well taken, and the same must be sustained. Butler v. Chateau et al., 83 Okla. 259, 201 Pac. 660; Bank v. Watson, 40 Okla. 450, 139 Pac. 306; Gibbs v. Tanner, 43 Okla. 477, 143 Pac. 189; Wagnon v. Davidson, 79 Okla. 209, 192 Pac. 565.

It is ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed.