Case ID: sw3d_390/html/0181-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marco McROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 96811.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    May 15, 2012.
    N. Scott Rosenbloom, Clayton, MO, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Jessica P. Meredith, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. P.J., and MARY K. HOFF and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Marco McRoberts (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues the motion court erred in denying his motion for post-conviction relief because his plea counsel failed to: (1) call witnesses with exculpatory testimony, and (2) depose the State’s witness to prevent the introduction of prejudicial hearsay evidence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).