Case ID: ohio-st-3d_71/html/0101-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Schumann.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Schumann (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 101.]
    (No. 94-1813
    Submitted October 24, 1994
    Decided December 7, 1994.)
    
      
      Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Hamid F. Craig III, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
    
      William M. Schumann, pro se.
    
   Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.