Case ID: so2d_481/html/0486-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gina C. PYSZKA, Appellant, v. Gerard E. PYSZKA, Appellee.
    No. 85-199.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 5, 1985.
    As Modified on Denial of Rehearing Jan. 28, 1986.
    Lapidus & Stettin and Richard L. Lapi-dus, Miami, for appellant.
    Carroll & Halberg and Daniels & Hicks and Mark Hicks, Miami, for appellee.
    Before HENDRY, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Gina Pyszka appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage which awarded her $3,000 per month in permanent periodic alimony, one-half of the assets from the sale of designated properties after payment of all debts, including the mortgage on the marital home, and the marital home. The husband was awarded his partnership interest in his law firm and the assets remaining after all debts, including appellant’s attorney’s fees, are paid.

We have carefully studied the record on appeal and find that the trial court did not abuse its broad discretion in fashioning an equitable, if not perfect, award. Marcoux v. Marcoux, 464 So.2d 542 (Fla.1985); Walter v. Walter, 464 So.2d 538 (Fla.1985); Mullins v. Mullins, 460 So.2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Affirmed.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

We modify the November 5, 1985 opinion to require appellee-husband to pay the income taxes on the award of permanent alimony. See Carroll v. Carroll, 471 So.2d 1358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Otherwise rehearing is denied.