Case ID: pa_390/html/0421-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Forcinal, Appellant, v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.
    Argued October 1, 1957.
    Before Jones, C. J., Bell, Chidsey, Arnold, Jones and Cohen, JJ.
    
      November 11, 1957:
    
      'William I. Crosby, with him Henry E. Rea, Jr., John A. Meta, Jr. and Meta, Coolc, Hanna & Kelly, for appellant.
    
      Leo Daniels, with him James A. Gelta and Prichard, Lawler & Gelta, for appellee.
   Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal comes before us from the refusal of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, en banc, to remove a compulsory nonsuit entered by the trial judge. After the introduction of plaintiffs evidence the trial judge entered the nonsuit because she found the plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

No useful purpose would be served by a detailed recital of the facts presented herein. After a complete review of the record we find no error in the determination of the trial judge or the refusal of the court en banc to remove the nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed.