Case ID: ny-2d_65/html/0656-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of City of New York, Appellant, v New York State Board of Equalization and Assessment, Respondent, and Donald N. David et al., Intervenors-Respondents.
    Argued April 25, 1985;
    decided May 28, 1985
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (Reed G. Schneider, Gary Schuller and Joseph I. Lauer of counsel), for appellant.
    
      William E. Banfield for Donald N. David, intervenor-respondent.
    
      Mark S. Tulis, intervenor-respondent pro se.
    
    
      Eugene J. Morris, intervenor-respondent pro se.
    
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Order reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Albany County, with directions to remit to the Board for determination of whether the S/I notations are statutorily exempt from disclosure for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Howard A. Levine at the Appellate Division (102 AD2d 987, 987-989).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander. Taking no part: Judge Titone.