Case ID: ohio-st-3d_32/html/0155-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel et al. v. Banig.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Banig (1987), 32 Ohio St. 3d 155.]
    (D.D. No. 86-32
    Decided August 26, 1987.)
    
      
      J. Warren Bettis, disciplinary counsel, and Charles T. Brown, for relator Office of Disciplinary Counsel.
    
      George A. Clark, for relator Akron Bar Association.
   Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, the findings of fact, and conclusions of the board, this court determines that there are ample facts to justify the board’s finding that Ronald A. Banig did in fact violate the Disciplinary Rules as set forth above.

We concur in the recommendation of the board, and hereby indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.