Case ID: f-appx_667/html/0525-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel C. SELUK, Jr.; Andrea D. Seluk, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS, Defendant-Appellee
    No. 16-20002 Summary Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    FILED July 18, 2016
    Daniel C. Seluk, Jr., Houston, TX, pro se.
    Andrea D. Seluk, Houston, TX, pro se.
    Robert William Higgason, Malissa Wilson, Senior Assistant City Attorney, City of Houston Legal Department, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before REAVLEY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is affirmed because the procedural due process claim of the Plaintiffs is alleged to have occurred due to action of the City ending before the sale of the property in May of 2012 and the state court’s encouragement in August of 2012. Plaintiffs filed this suit on April 1, 2015. Because, as the district court has explained to Plaintiffs, limitations had expired and barred this lawsuit.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.