Case ID: sw2d_863/html/0616-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Roma POOLE, Jr., Appellant.
    No. 61248.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Oct. 13, 1992.
    Sandra Moore-Dyson, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a jury conviction of drug trafficking in the second degree in violation of § 195.223(3) RSMo. (1989). We affirm.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).