Case ID: cust-ct_2/html/0726-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Sullivan, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 41451.
    Protests 663213-G, etc., of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc. (Seattle).
   Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) balls similar to those the subject of United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) and Abstract 27179 at 30 percent under paragraph 1502; (2) tennis rackets similar to those the subject of May v. United States (T. D. 47760) and Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48573) at 30 percent under paragraph 1502; and (3) candy containers at 35 percent under paragraph 1413, Abstract 33265 followed. • - -