Case ID: so2d_513/html/0718-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carl LINDBACK, III, Appellant, v. Niki LESKO and Loran Van Vleet, Appellees.
    No. 87-9.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Sept. 22, 1987.
    Rehearing Denied Oct. 21, 1987.
    Kenneth H. Smith, Tavernier, for appellant.
    Tittle & Tittle and Gus H. Crowell, Tav-ernier, for appellees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY  and JORGENSON, JJ.
    
      
       Judge Hendry did not hear oral argument.
    
   PER CURIAM.

We find no abuse of discretion in the order under review granting a new trial on the well-articulated and fully supported grounds that the jury verdict was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence and indicated that the jury had been influenced by considerations outside the record. See Ford Motor Co. v. Kikis, 401 So.2d 1341 (Fla.1981); Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So.2d 669 (Fla.1959).

Affirmed.