Case ID: nys_31/html/1129-16.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LYNCH, Respondent, v. LOVE, Appellant.
    (Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.
    January 7, 1895.)
    Action by Thomas A. Lynch against Catharine Love.
    James R. Angel, for appellant.
    William F. Browne, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment in favor of the plaintiff is found to be supported by the evidence, and, while the record presents a conflict of testimony, there is no such preponderance in favor of the appellant’s contention as should justify a reversal. The record contains no excentions to rulings made below. Judgment affirmed, with costs.