Case ID: sw2d_859/html/0276-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jitendra P. SHAH, d/b/a A & R Investments, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Donald V. NANGLE and Jack C. Harper, Defendants/Respondents.
    No. 63057.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Aug. 24, 1993.
    Joel Case, Sally S. Rajnoha, Case & Rajn-oha, Ballwin, for plaintiff/appellant.
    Arthur G. Muegler, Jr., Clayton, for defendant/respondent Donald V. Nangle.
    Feme P. Wolf, Michael B. Marker, St. Louis, for defendant/respondent Jack C. Harper.
    Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-landlord sought to recover unpaid rent from defendants. In this court-tried case, plaintiff appeals from the directed verdict for defendants at the end of all the evidence. We affirm. No error of law appears in the trial court’s judgment; an. extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).