Case ID: f-appx_688/html/0120-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN RE: Eliston F. GEORGE, Petitioner
    No. 17-1129
    United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
    (Opinion filed: May 4, 2017)
    Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. February 23, 2017
    Eliston F. George, Pro Se
    Pamela R. Tepper, Esq., Su-Layne U. Walker, Esq., Office of Attorney General of Virgin Islands, Department of Justice, St. Thomas, VI, for Defendant-Respondent
    Before: SMITH, CHIEF JUDGE, MCKEE and FUENTES, Circuit Judges
   OPINION

PER CURIAM

Eliston F. George filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that we direct the District Court to rule on his petition for a writ of audita querela. The District Court has since ruled on George’s petition, and George has filed a notice of appeal. In light of the District Court’s action, the question George presented is no longer a live controversy, so we will dismiss his mandamus petition as moot. See, e.g., Lusardi v. Xerox Corp., 975 F.2d 964, 974 (3d Cir. 1992). 
      
       This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.