Case ID: or-app_55/html/1028-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted January 15,
    reversed and remanded for trial February 8, 1982
    STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. JAMES N. SCHMITZ, Respondent.
    
    (No. 81-28 and 81-29, CA A21890)
    639 P2d 1317
    Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and William F. Gary, Solicitor General, Salem.
    Gregory J. Leineweber, St. Helens, waived appearance for respondent.
    Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Roberts and Young, Judges.
    PER CURIAM.
   PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s determination that there were no exigent circumstances justifying the warrantless search in this case was erroneous. Reversed and remanded for trial.