Case ID: ohio-st-3d_105/html/0176-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State ex rel. Maynard, Appellant, v. Invensys Application Controls et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as State ex rel. Maynard v. Invensys Application Controls, 105 Ohio St.3d 176, 2005-Ohio-1147.]
    
      (No. 2004-0924
    Submitted February 15, 2005
    Decided March 30, 2005.)
    Michael J. Muldoon, for appellant.
    Roetzel & Andress, L.P.A., Charles D. Smith, and Eric S. Bravo, for appellee Invensys Application Controls.
    ■Tim Petro, Attorney General, and Paul H. Tonks, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.
   {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.