Case ID: ny-super-ct_59/html/0583-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jacob H. Deitsch, Respondent v. Frederick Schanning, et al., Appellants.
    Decided April 16, 1891.
    Appeal from a judgment entered Upon a verdict .and from an order denying a motion for a new trial upon the minutes.
    Joseph N. Goldbacher, for appellants.
    Adolph L. Sanger, for respondent.
    Before Truax and Dugro, JJ.
   The Court (Dugro, J., writing, Truax,. J., concurring) held, that the verdict was in excess of what was warranted by the evidence, and reversed the judgment unless the appellant consented to a reduction and in case of such consent affirmed it, without costs,