Case ID: nys_66/html/1133-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HOLLINGSWORTH, Appellant, v. SPECTATOR CO., Respondent.
    (No. 2.)
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    July 17, 1900.)
    Action by John E. Hollingsworth against the Spectator Company. From an interlocutory judgment overruling plaintiff’s demurrer to paragraphs 4 and 6 of defendant’s answer, plaintiff appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Henry T. Fay, for appellant. Franklin Bartlett, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

For the reasons given in the opinion in Hollingsworth v. Spectator Co. (action No. 1, handed down herewith) 65 N. Y. Supp. 812, the interlocutory judgment should be affirmed, with costs.