Case ID: f-appx_688/html/0182-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Christopher M. OXENDINE-BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. David MITCHELL; Terry Lemon; Michael L. Brooks; John Aaron; Jane Mims; Angela Rorie; Kenneth A. Beaver; Kristopher C. Kiker; Milessia Abernathy, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 16-7362
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 28, 2017
    Decided: May 3, 2017
    Christopher M. Oxendine-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly D. Grande, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appel-lees.
    Before WILKINSON, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher M. Oxendine-Bey appeals the district court’s order and judgment granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Oxendine-Bey v. R. Mitchell, No. 3:14-cv-00651-FDW, 2016 WL 4646447 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED