Case ID: f2d_788/html/1147-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Paul Edward ARCHIE, et al., Plaintiffs, Paul Edward Archie, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David A. CHRISTIAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 84-2175.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    May 5, 1986.
    Paul E. Archie, pro se.
    Jim Mattox, Atty. Gen., M. Lawrence Wells, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for defendants-appellees.
    
      ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
    (Opinion August 19, 1985, 5 Cir., 1985, 768 F.2d 726)
    Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, HILL, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
   BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc without oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.