Case ID: sw3d_426/html/0017-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Markis F. RUDD, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 99655.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    March 25, 2014.
    Andrew Edward Zleit, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before LISA VAN AMBURG, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Markis Rudd (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury found him guilty of robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in overruling his hearsay objection to witness testimony.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).