Case ID: ga-app_31/html/0549-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, 0. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

15112.
    Mitchell v. Whitley.
    Decided January 18, 1924.
    Complaint; from city court of LaGrange—Judge Duke Davis. October 1, 1923.
    
      Wyatt & Branan, for plaintiff in error. E. A. Jones, contra.
   Broyles, 0. J.

Counsel for the plaintiff in error having stated in his brief that he is insisting upon the special grounds only of the motion for a new trial, and none of those grounds, upon a careful consideration thereof, showing cause for a new trial, the judgment below is

Affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.