Case ID: ill-app_209/html/0356-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice O’Connor", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

C. W. Marks Shoe Company, Appellant, v. B. Brotman, Appellee.
    Gen. No. 23,226. (Not to be reported in full.)
    Abstract of the Decision.
    Replevin, § 123
      
      .—when finding properly in favor of defendant. In an action of replevin, evidence held to sustain a finding in favor of defendant.
    Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John Stblk, Judge, presiding.
    Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1917.
    Affirmed.
    Opinion filed January 30, 1918.
    Rehearing denied February 13, 1918.
    Statement of the Case.
    Replevin by C. W. Marks Shoe Company, a corporation, plaintiff, against B. Brotman, defendant. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
    Dulsky & Dulsky, for appellant.
    Abraham Lidsky and Preston Clark, for appellee.
    
      
      See Illinois Notes Digest, Yols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.
    
   Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the e'ourt.