Case ID: ohio-st-3d_123/html/0087-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Miller, Appellant, v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as Miller v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 123 Ohio St.3d 87, 2009-Ohio-4081.]
    (No. 2009-0555
    Submitted August 11, 2009
    Decided August 19, 2009.)
    Timothy A. Miller, pro se.
    Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Jerri L. Fosnaught, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
   Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Timothy A. Miller, for a writ of habeas corpus. Miller previously filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus that raised the same issues as in this petition. Miller v. Eberlin, 116 Ohio St.3d 1434, 2007-Ohio-6518, 877 N.E.2d 987. Res judicata barred Miller from filing a successive habeas corpus petition. Amstutz v. Eberlin, 119 Ohio St.3d 421, 2008-Ohio-4538, 894 N.E.2d 1219, ¶ 7.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.