Case ID: or_63/html/0149-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Chief Justice Eakin. Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued June 25,
    decided July 9,
    Petition for Rehearing decided October 15, 1912,
    THRUSH v. THRUSH.
    (125 Pac. 267.)
    (126 Pac. 995.)
    From Douglas: James W. Hamilton, Judge.
    This is a suit by Abram Lincoln Thrush against Abram Thrush and Mary Thrush to set aside a deed to certain lands in Douglas County. There was a decree in favor of plaintiff, and defendants appeal.
    Affirmed.
    For appellants there was a brief over the names of Messrs. Cardwell & Watson, with an oral argument by Mr. James 0. Watson.
    
    For respondent there was a brief over the names of Messrs. Broiun & Eddy, with an oral argument by Mr. B. L. Eddy.
    
   Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Eakin.

This suit presents the same issue as the case of Emry H. Thrush v. Abram Thrush et al., 63 Or. 143 (125 Pac. 267), in which the opinion has been filed .today, but involves the south one-half of the northeast one-quarter and lots 1 and 2 of section 7, township 29 south, range 8 west, Willamette meridian.

The cases were tried together upon the same evidence and briefs, and upon the authority of that case the decree is affirmed. Affirmed.

Decided October 15, 1912.

On Rehearing.

(126 Pac. 995.)

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case is identical in facts with the case of Emry H. Thrush v. Abram and Mary Thrush, 63 Or. 149 (126 Pac. 994), just decided, and for the reasons given in that opinion will be reversed, With costs.

Reversed on Rehearing.