Case ID: so2d_587/html/0676-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

REGENCY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. MATSON INSURANCE AND BONDING, INC., Appellee.
    No. 91-105.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 29, 1991.
    Kluger, Peretz, Kaplan, & Berlin and Alan J. Kluger, Miami, for appellant.
    Touby Smith DeMahy & Drake and Kenneth R. Drake, Miami, for appellee.
    Before FERGUSON, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

A review of the record reflects sufficient evidence, including reasonable inferences that may properly be drawn therefrom, so as to entitle the appellant to have its case submitted to a jury for the determination of the questions of fact. See Brown v. Sims, 538 So.2d 901 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Hernandez v. Motrico, Inc., 370 So.2d 836 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Accordingly, it was error for the trial court to grant the appellee’s Motion for Directed Verdict.

Reversed.