Case ID: cal-app_65/html/0790-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "ST. SURE, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[Civ. No. 4789.
    First Appellate District, Division One.
    December 21, 1923.]
    WILLIAM LOCKE PADDON, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Respondents.
    
       Contempt—Disregard oe Subpoena—Certiorari.—Contempt proceedings affirmed upon authority of Paddon v. Superior Court, aMte, p. 34.
    PROCEEDING in Certiorari to review an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, Walter Perry Johnson, Judge, directing the issuance of a warrant of attachment to answer for contempt. Order affirmed and writ dismissed.
    The questions presented are the same as those involved in Paddon v. Superior Court, ante, p. 34.
    J. L. Smith for Petitioner.
    Preston & Duncan and W. A. Andrews for Respondents.
   ST. SURE, J.

The questions presented in the above-entitled proceeding are the same as those involved in proceeding numbered 4790 of the same title, this day decided. Upon the authority of that case we are of the opinion that the proceedings had in the court below, in the action entitled Una Margaret Locke Paddon, Plaintiff, v. William Locke Paddon et als., Defendants, which said action is numbered 128432, ante, p. 34 [223 Pac. 91., in the office of the county clerk of the city and county of San Francisco, state, of California, are proper and should be affirmed. It is so ordered and the writ is dismissed.

Tyler, P. J., concurred.

A petition for rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on January 19, 1924, and an application by petitioner to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on February 18', 1924.

All the Justices concurred.