Case ID: f-appx_312/html/0584-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ritchie John HORVATH, III, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-8166.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 19, 2009.
    Decided: Feb. 25, 2009.
    Ritchie John Horvath, III, Appellant Pro Se.
    Anthony Paul Giorno, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   • Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.'

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ritchie John Horvath, III, appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for modification of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Horvath, No. 4:05-cr-00008-FFF-6 (W.D.Va. Sept. 2, 2008; Sept. 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.