Case ID: so2d_752/html/1259-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNIVERSITY PINE RETIREMENT and Wausau Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Sherri MYERS, Respondent.
    No. 1D99-2546.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    March 13, 2000.
    Kimberly A. Wilson of Sharp & Gay, P.A., Jacksonville, for Petitioners.
    T. Rhett Smith of T. Rhett Smith, P.A., Pensacola, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, the employer/earrier (E/C) petition this court for a writ of certiorari to review an order entered by the judge of compensation claims (JCC). The order at issue granted the claimant’s motion for a protective order and provided that a rehabilitation nurse hired by the E/C could not communicate ex parte with any health care provider involved in this case because the nurse was an independent contractor, not a “direct ‘in-house’ employee” of the E/C. In support of their petition, the E/C argue only that rehabilitation providers are included in section 440.13(4)(e), Florida Statutes, as among those authorized to conduct ex parte communications with a claimant’s health care providers. We deny the petition.

KAHN, WEBSTER, and PADOVANO, CONCUR.