Case ID: f-appx_621/html/0211-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald CASTON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-7012.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 20, 2015.
    Decided: Oct. 23, 2015.
    Donald M. Caston, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Calvin Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donald Caston appeals the district court’s orders denying Caston a sentence reduction, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012), and denying as unauthorized Caston’s motion for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Further, the district court properly recognized that it lacked the authority to entertain a motion for reconsideration in a § 3582(c)(2) proceeding. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.2010). We therefore affirm the orders for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Caston, No. 3:06-cr-00190-REP-1 (E.D Va. May 7, 2015 & June 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.