Case ID: so2d_215/html/0007-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Fay EHLEBRACHT, Petitioner, v. TROPICAL WINDOW CLEANING, INC., et al., Respondents.
    No. 37684.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Oct. 23, 1968.
    Gerald T. Nolan, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.
    Wicker, Smith, Pyszka, Blomqvist & Davant, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 5, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petitions, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

Accordingly the petitions for certiorari and attorney’s fee are denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting Chief Justice, and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.