Case ID: sw2d_948/html/0257-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Margaret DENT, Employee/Appellant, v. THE BODY SHOP, Employer/Respondent.
    No. 71632.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Six.
    July 8, 1997.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.
   ORDER

Claimant appeals the denial of her claim for workers’ compensation benefits by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission). We affirm.

The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).