Case ID: ohio-st-3d_33/html/0123-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hyatt et al. v. Bettis, Disciplinary Counsel.
    [Cite as Hyatt v. Bettis (1987), 33 Ohio St. 3d 123.]
    (No. 87-1577
    Decided December 2, 1987.)
    
      
      Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue¡ Patrick F. McCartan and John W. Zeiger, for plaintiffs Joel Z. Hyatt, William H. Brooks and Hyatt Legal Services.
    
      J. Warren Bettis, disciplinary counsel, and Mark H. Aultman,- for defendant;
   Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs’ complaint for a declaratory judgment and defendant’s cross-complaint for declaratory judgment are dismissed.

Complaint and cross-complaint dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Wright, J., dissents.