Case ID: so2d_296/html/0057-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Roderick Bruce McCLOUD and Frank Conyers, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. U-216 and U-265.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 20, 1974.
    Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and David J. Busch, Asst. Public Defender, for appellants.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We have read the entire record and the excellent briefs filed by the attorneys for each of the parties. We have also read and considered the supplemental brief of appellant Roderick Bruce McCloud prepared by his “advocate.” Several pages could be devoted to a recitation of the factual background of these cases; and numerous other pages to citations, quotations and discussions of applicable law, none of which would add to the jurisprudence of this State nor to the enlightenment of either the appellants or' appellee. Suffice to say that our consideration of the record and briefs fails to reveal demonstrable prejudicial error. Indeed, we find no error at all.

Appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgments and sentences appealed are

Affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and BOYER and Mc-CORD, JJ., concur.