Case ID: f-appx_430/html/0239-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Clinton Decarlo COWLES, Sr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. John KULPLINSKI, Administrator; Carl Smith, Jr., Officer; D.L. Arnold, Captain/Director of Personnel and Training, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 11-6251.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 19, 2011.
    Decided: May 24, 2011.
    Clinton Decarlo Cowles, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Clinton Decarlo Cowles, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cowles v. Kulplinski, No. 1:10-cv-00836-LMB-IDD, 2011 WL 586919 (E.D.Va. Feb. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.