Case ID: f-appx_5/html/0165-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Lee HARRIS, a/k/a Peejack, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 01-6026.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 22, 2001.
    Decided March 1, 2001.
    
      Robert Lee Harris, pro se. Jerri Ulrica Dunston, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.
    Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

Robert Lee Harris appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). Although the district court entered judgment on the merits in favor of the Government, we conclude that the motion was not brought within the one-year period specified by § 2255 and, therefore, was untimely. United States v. Torres, 211 F.3d 836, 837 (4th Cir.2000) (holding that the one-year period commences with this court’s mandate when no petition for certiorari is filed). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the ground that Harris’ § 2255 motion was time-barred. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.