Case ID: ga-app_113/html/0554-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Nichols, Presiding Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

41956.
    RHEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. HUTCHESON.
    Argued April 5, 1966
    Decided April 12, 1966
    Rehearing denied April 29, 1966
    
      Long, Weinberg & Ansley, Gregg Loomis, for appellant.
    
      Nall, Miller, Cadenhead & Dennis, Lynn A. Downey, for appellee.
   Nichols, Presiding Judge.

1. Where a petition is voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff and before refiling the plaintiff obtains a statement from the clerk of the court as to the costs due' and pays the amount of costs as shown on such statement, a plea in abatement will not lie to such refiled action because the clerk made a mistake in figuring such costs. See McDonald v. Wimpy, 204 Ga. 617 (50 SE2d 347); Whitsett v. Hester-Bowman Enterprises, Inc., 94 Ga. App. 78 (93 SE2d 788).

2. In the present case the plaintiff paid the costs (which the clerk of the court said were due) accruing from the filing of the first petition which he voluntarily dismissed before the second petition was filed, and the trial court did not err in overruling the defendant’s plea in abatement based upon the ground that all the costs arising from the filing of the first petition had not been paid.

Judgment affirmed.

Hall and Deen, JJ., concur.