Case ID: f-appx_202/html/0969-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark HADDOCK, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-30071.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 16, 2006.
    
    Filed Oct. 23, 2006.
    Dennis J. Dimsey, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division/Appellate Section, Dirk C. Phillips, Dept, of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Steven V. Richert, Esq., Federal Defenders Eastern Washington and Idaho, Pocatello, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Mark Haddock appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for deprivation of rights under color of law, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242.

We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Jeronimo, 398 F.3d 1149, 1152-53 (9th Cir.2005) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered into knowingly and voluntarily).

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.