Case ID: ad2d_42/html/0951-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(October 19, 1973)
    In the Matter of Donald Cawley, Petitioner v. Joseph Brust et al., Respondents.
   Application for a writ of prohibition unanimously granted only to the extent of vacating the stay of the Police Commissioner’s order transferring the petitioner police captain. (CPLR 5704.) In all other respects the application is denied, without costs and without disbursements. We refrain from further consideration on the merits only because Justice Brust has reserved decision on respondent’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Use of the writ of prohibition has usually been limited to cases where a court acts without jurisdiction. (See, e.g., Matter of Hogan v. Culkin, 18 N Y 2d 330, 335 — 336; People ex rel. Lemon v. Supreme Ct., 245 N. Y. 24.) And while it seems clear that service of the order to show cause on Sunday was “ absolutely void for any and every purpose whatsoever ” (General Business Law, § 11), we refrain from utilizing the extraordinary remedy sought since if error is committed it can readily be corrected on appeal. (See Lee v. County Ct. of Erie County, 27 N Y 2d 432 and cases cited.) The stay contained in Justice Tilzer’s order dated October 10, 1973, is vacated. Concur — McGivern, J. P., Nunez, Murphy, Tilzer and Capozzoli, JJ.