Case ID: ga_116/html/0514-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Eish, 3.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Winn v. The State.
    Argued October 20,
    Decided November 12, 1902.
    Indictment for cheating and swindling. Before Judge Little-john. Schley superior court. June 5, 1902.
    
      J. JR. Williams, for plaintiff in error.
    
      F. A. Hooper, solicitor-general ', contra.
   Eish, 3.

There being no complaint that any error of law was committed on the trial, there being evidence to sustain the verdict, and the trial judge being satisfied, therewith, the Supreme Court will not reverse the judgment denying a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumplcin, P. J., absent, and Candler, J., not presiding.