Case ID: nj-eq_63/html/0800-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Martha A. McMullin et ux., complainants and respondents, v. Sarah N. Doughty, defendant and appellant.
    [Filed June 23d, 1902.]
    
      Mr. Herbert A. Drake, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. David J. Pancoast, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Grey delivered in the court below. See 17 Dick. Ch. Rep. 252.

For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Van Syokel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Vroom—13.

For reversal—None.