Case ID: so2d_810/html/0995-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alton McCALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D02-159.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Feb. 20, 2002.
    Alton McCall, Coleman, pro se.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying post-conviction relief. We certify the same question certified in Stretcher v. State, 803 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001):

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

STONE, FARMER, and MAY, JJ„ concur.