Case ID: cust-ct_1/html/0545-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dallinger, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 40165.
    Protests 303906-G, etc., of A. Steinhardt & Bro. et al. (New York).
   Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the atomizers and thimbles in question are chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes or are hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.