Case ID: f-appx_323/html/0255-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael McNEILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank STAMPER, Defendant-Appellee, and Sergeant Kinney; Atlantic Diagnostic of Durham; NC Doc Director, Defendants.
    No. 09-6264.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 16, 2009.
    Decided: April 27, 2009.
    Michael McNeill, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, Kelly Elizabeth Street, Young, Moore & Henderson, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    
      Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael McNeill appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s previous order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McNeill v. Stamper, No. 3:08-cv-00162-GCM (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2009). We deny McNeill’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.