Case ID: njl_64/html/0362-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOSEPH A. OSBORNE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. THE BOROUGH OF SPRING LAKE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted December 12, 1899
    Decided March 5, 1900.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiff in error, Hawkins & Durand.
    
    For the defendant in error, R. Ten Broeck & Wesley B. Stout.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the memorandum filed in that court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Depue, Yak Syckel, Garrison, Lippincott, Gummere, Bogert, Nixon, Hendrickson, Adams, Yredenburgh. 11.

For reversal—None.