Case ID: ga-app_34/html/0039-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodwobth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

16293.
    Hill v. Bennett, superintendent of banks.
    Decided May 14, 1925.
    Complaint; from city court of Nashville—Judge W. B. Smith. January 29, 1925.
    
      Hendricks & Hendricks, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Dewey Knight, contra.
   Bloodwobth, J.

1. There is no merit in the ground of the motion for a new trial which alleges that the court erred in excluding from the jury certain testimony. -

2. The court properly directed a verdict for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.