Case ID: ohio-law-abs_6/html/0402-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "LLOYD,' J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BALSMEYER v. LANSDALE.
    Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist., Lucas Co.
    Edw. H. Ray, Toledo, for Balsmeyer.
    Ralph Emery, Toledo, for Lansdale ét.
    1159. TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS — 542 Foreclosure — 677 Judgments and Decrees— 1085 Service of Summons.
    Decree, foreclosing lien for taxes, held a nullity as to intervening defendants in suit to quiet title.
   LLOYD,' J.

Decree foreclosing lien for taxes held a nullity as to intervening defendants in suit to quiet title, where notice by publication contained no summary statement of object and prayer of petitions, as required by 11295 GC., in that it did not describe or refer to land owned by such defendants, nor indicate that action concerned them, and decree .found merely that service by publication was made on “large number of defendants and unknown heirs of deceased persons.”

(Richards, PJ., and Williams, J., concur.)

For reference to full opinion, see Omnibus Index, last page, this issue.