Case ID: ohio-st-3d_136/html/1235-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Akron Bar Association v. Pringle.
    [Cite as Akron Bar Assn. v. Pringle, 136 Ohio St.3d 1235, 2013-Ohio-3168.]
    (No. 1995-2557 —
    Submitted July 11, 2013 —
    Decided July 22, 2013.)
   {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Elbert R. Pringle, Attorney Registration No. 0031357, last known business address in Jacksonville, Florida.

{¶ 2} The court, coming now to consider its order of March 6, 1996, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.