Case ID: f-appx_5/html/0751-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LANDMARK CAPITAL II, LLC, a California limited liability company; Roberta K. Lowery, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Fred HAMEETMAN; Cal-American Property Fund III, a California limited partnership; Cal-American Property Fund VI, a California limited partnership; Cal-American Property VII, a California limited partnership; Cal-American Property Fund IV, a California limited partnership, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 99-56701.
    D.C. No. CV-99-03851-RSWL.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted March 6, 2001.
    Decided March 13, 2001.
    Before ALARCÓN, BRUNETTI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
   MEMORANDUM

Limited partnership interests in the partnerships of Cal-American Income Property Funds III, IV, VI and VII do not constitute a cognizable relevant market under 15 U.S.C. § 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. See Queen City Pizza, Inc. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 124 F.3d 430, 436 (3d Cir.1997); Kalmanovitz v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc., 576 F.Supp. 922, 927 (D.Del.1983). Therefore, Landmark II has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.