Case ID: sw3d_138/html/0782-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Collus K. WATSON, Appellant.
    No. WD 62422.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    July 13, 2004.
    Amy M. Bartholow, Columbia, for Appellant.
    Deborah Daniels, Jefferson City, for Respondent.
    Before SPINDEN, P.J., HOLLIGER and HARDWICK, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Collus Watson was convicted on two counts of distributing a controlled substance within 2,000 feet of a school, Section 195.214, R.S.Mo.2000. On appeal, he contends the trial court plainly erred in allowing and considering evidence of his prior uncharged crimes. We deny plain error review and affirm because Watson has failed to demonstrate that the trial court relied on inadmissible evidence in determining his guilt and sentence. The parties have been provided with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).