Case ID: sw2d_878/html/0930-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Garry D. ACUNCIUS, Appellant/Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF AUDRAIN, Respondent/Defendant.
    No. 64368.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Northern Division.
    July 19, 1994.
    Michael F. Dandino, Jerome Wallaeh, Wal-lach Law Firm, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Thomas I. Osborne, Pros. Atty., Audrain County, Mexico, for respondent.
    Before CRIST, P.J., and CRANDALL and CRANE, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant in an action for breach of an employment contract. We affirm.

The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carrón, 586 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).