Case ID: ohio-law-abs_5/html/0075-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 95
    FRANK v. AUTO BODY CO.
    No. 20256.
    Supreme Court
    829. NEGLIGENCE — Where one recovers for injuries sustained while running a circular saw upon ground that same was not properly guarded, can such judgment be reversed as contrary to law upon the ground that such person was president of the company and it was not his duty, to run the saw?
    Attorneys — Preusser & Morris for Frank; O. H. Goudy and Lex Kinter for Company; all of Cleveland.
   Frank contends in the Supreme Court that even if he is president of a company he is entitled to recover for injurits received while running a circular saw which was improperly guarded and such judgment should not be reversed because contrary to law upon ground that it was not his duty to operate the saw.