Case ID: sw3d_396/html/0405-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard HAMPTON, Appellant, v. DAIMLER/CHRYSLER CORPORATION and Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondents.
    No. ED 98767.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Feb. 26, 2013.
    Rehearing Denied April 8, 2013.
    James F. McCartney, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Jason Caudill, Saint Louis, MO, for Respondents.
    Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Hampton (“Claimant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) dismissal of Claimant’s claims for worker’s compensation. We find that the Commission did not err in affirming the ALJ’s orders of dismissal without affording Claimant the opportunity to present additional evidence. Furthermore, the orders of dismissal are consistent with Missouri law and are supported by sufficient competent and substantial evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b) (2012). 
      
      . Daimler/Chrysler Corporation’s motion for sanctions under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.19 (2012) and Claimant’s motion to dismiss Daimler/Chrysler Corporation’s motion for sanctions, both taken with the case, are denied.