Case ID: f-appx_21/html/0755-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darrell L. HARGROVE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 98-10362.
    D.C. No. CR-95-00260-FMS.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 5, 2001 .
    Decided Nov. 13, 2001.
    Before KLEINFELD, McKEOWN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4
    
   MEMORANDUM

Darrell L. Hargrove appeals his guilty plea conviction for unlawful use of a communication facility, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b). Hargrove contends that the district court erred by sentencing him to a two-year term of supervised release. The maximum term of imprisonment for the charge to which Hargrove pled guilty is more than one year but less than five years; the offense therefore is a “Class E” felony. 18 U.S.C. § 3559(a)(5). The maximum term of supervised release after imprisonment for a Class E felony is one year. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(b)(3). The government concedes this point. We therefore vacate Hargrove’s term of supervised release and order the district court to limit, on remand, the term of supervised release to not more than one year.

VACATED and REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.