Case ID: f-appx_74/html/0291-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SKIPPY INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIPTON INVESTMENTS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 03-1086.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 29, 2003.
    Decided Sept. 12, 2003.
    Mary Helen Sears, M.H. Sears Law Firm, Washington, DC, for Appellant. William M. Webner, Sughrue Mion, P.L.L.C., Washington, DC, for Appellee.
    
      Before WILKINSON, WIDENER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Skippy Incorporated appeals the district court’s order dismissing its complaint, among other reasons, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have thoroughly reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Skippy Inc. v. Lipton Investments, Inc., No. CA-02-1227-A (E.D.Va. Dec. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.