Case ID: sw2d_956/html/0464-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Roy L. FRANKLIN, Appellant.
    No. WD 53361.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Dec. 16, 1997.
    Irene Kams, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.
    Before SPINDEN, P.J., and LAURA DENVIR STITH and EDWIN H. SMITH, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Roy Franklin appeals his conviction for first-degree tampering with a motor vehicle. He claims that the trial court erred in denying him a mistrial after inadmissible evidence of other crimes was admitted. We disagree and hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for a mistrial. Finding no precedential value to our decision, we affirm by this summary order but have provided the parties with a memorandum setting out the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).