Case ID: so2d_596/html/1298-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Louis ST. LAURENT, et al., Appellants, v. Raymond MARTIN, et al., Appellees.
    No. 90-581.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 5, 1992.
    
      Louis S. St. Laurent, in pro. per., and for appellant, Can Am Investments, Inc.
    Gars, Dixon & Shapiro, and M. Jeffrey Speno, Miami, for appellees.
    Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
   CORRECTED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Blanco v. State, 452 So.2d 520 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181, 105 S.Ct. 940, 83 L.Ed.2d 958 (1985); Steelier v. Pomeroy, 253 So.2d 421 (Fla.1971); Trees v. K-Mart Corporation, 467 So.2d 401 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 479 So.2d 119 (Fla.1985).