Case ID: f-appx_195/html/0191-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Vincent F. RIVERA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alberto GONZALES, United States Attorney General, Judicial Conference of the USA, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 06-6895.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 31, 2006.
    Decided: Aug. 24, 2006.
    Vincent F. Rivera, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Vincent F. Rivera appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion in which he sought relief from the judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rivera v. Gonzales, No. l:05-cv-00246-TSE (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 24, 2006; entered Apr. 25, 2006). We deny Rivera’s motion for appointment of counsel and his motion to supplement the record. Further, we deny as moot Rivera’s motion to expedite the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.