Case ID: so2d_534/html/1246-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carlos NODA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 87-1332.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 20, 1988.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Robert Burke, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Michele L. Crawford, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., HUBBART, J., and EDWARD T. BARFIELD, Associate Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in the contention that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the defendant’s conviction. Neither the appellant’s evidentiary point nor his claim that the jury instructions were misleading was preserved below and neither presents fundamental error. Therefore, the judgment below is

AFFIRMED.