Case ID: paige-ch_4/html/0479-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "The Chancellor.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marten vs. Van Schaick & Bloodgood.
    Upon a bill filed by one of the partners to close up a partnership concern, it is a matter of course to appoint a receiver if the parties cannot agree among themselves as to the disposition and control of the property. And where it is necessary to preserve the good will of the business, the receiver may be directed to carry it on, under the direction of the court, until a sale can be effected.
    The bill in this cause was filed for the purpose of dissolving a partnership which had existed between the parties, and to settle the partnership accounts and distribute the property and effects of the firm.
    July 15.
    
      
      J. Rhoades, for the complainant,
    moved for the appointment of a receiver to take charge of the partnership effects, consisting of a printing establishment, and the subscription list and advertising custom of a public newspaper.
    S. Stevens, for the defendants,
    opposed the application, on the ground that the principal value of the property consisted in the good will of their business, which would be lost by the appointment of a receiver.
   The Chancellor.

Each partner has an equal right in this case to the possession and control of the partnership effects and business, and if they cannot agree among themselves, it is a matter of course to appoint a receiver, upon a bill filed to close the partnership concerns, on the application of either party. If a receiver is appointed, he must proceed and sell the establishment without delay; and in the mean time the business must be carried on by him, as usual, so that the good will thereof may be secured to the purchaser, and the full value of the establishment realized by the partners, on such sale. But the court will not take upon itself the responsibility of continuing the publication of a political paper, by a .receiver, any longer than is absolutely necessary to prevent a sacrifice of the property. Until a sale can be effected, the defendants may continue to superintend the editorial department of the paper, as they have heretofore done; but the paper must be published under the direction of the receiver, who will be personally responsible for any publication therein which is improper.

There must be a reference to a master to appoint a receiver, without delay.