Case ID: nj-eq_103/html/0023-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary Watson Reik, respondent, v. Henry O. Reik, appellant.
    [Decided May 14th, 1928.]
    On appeal from an order of the court of chancery.
    
      Messrs. Cole & Cole, for the respondent.
    
      Messrs. Bourgeois & Coulomb, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, and reported in 101 N. J. Eq. 523.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Héteield, Dear, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.