Case ID: ohio-law-abs_1/html/0282-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 241
    PUGH v. STATE
    Ohio Court of Appeals, Cuyahoga County
    No. 4634.
    March 12, 1923
    PRACTICE — Bill of exceptions deficient.
    Error to Cleveland Municipal Court
    Attorneys — V. J. Conrad, for Pugh; Lee E. Skeel, for State.
   PER CURIAM:

Epitomized Opinion

The record in this case is in such a condition that the Court of Appeals can do nothing but reverse the case because the bill of expections, as presented to us, approved and signed by the trial judge, purports to contain all the evidence introduced' in the court below, and the same contains no evidence upon which to base a'conviction. Judgment reversed and remanded to the Municipal Court.