Case ID: f-appx_710/html/0163-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael CROMWELL, a/k/a Mike Tyson, a/k/a Mikey, a/k/a Charlie, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 17-7389
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: January 30, 2018
    Decided: February 2, 2018
    
      Michael Cromwell, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Evan DePadilla, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Cromwell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cromwell, No. 2:11-cr-00009-AWA-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED 
      
       Because Cromwell does not challenge on appeal the district court's disposition of his claim based on Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines, he has forfeited appellate review of that issue, See 4th Cir. R, 34(b).