Case ID: how-pr_2/html/0273-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bronson, Chief Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John Constantine agt. John S. Van Winkle.
    On a motion for re-taxation of costs, the moving party should show affirmatively, ly affidavit, how the bill was taxed, and what items were objected to, before the taxing officer. (Nee 1 Howard, 136.)
    
      September Term, 1846.
    Motion by plaintiff for re-taxation of costs.
    The plaintiff moved for re-taxation of costs in this cause, but did not produce any affidavit stating the objections before the taxing officer, or how the bill was taxed.
    E. Sandford, plaintiff's counsel.
    
    Sandfords & Porter, plaintiff's attcyrneys.
    
    M. T. Reynolds, defendant's counsel.
    
    A, H. Wallis, defendant's attorney.
    
   Bronson, Chief Justice.

Denied the motion with costs, on the ground that the moving party did not produce an affida- ' vit showing how the bill of costs was. taxed, before the taxing officer.