Case ID: f-appx_323/html/0571-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

INTERNATIONAL NORCENT TECHNOLOGY, a California Corporation, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS, N.V., a Netherlands corporation; Philips Electronics North America Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants — Appellees.
    No. 07-56871.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted April 15, 2009.
    Filed April 22, 2009.
    Bruce G. Chapman, Esquire, Joseph James Mellema, Esquire, Minda R. Schechter, Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Danielle Y. Conley, Esquire, A. Stephen Hut, Esquire, A. Douglas Melamed, Esquire, Ryan Patrick Phair, Esquire, Wil-merhale LLP, Washington, DC, Robert L. Corbin, Esquire, Michael W. Fitzgerald, Esquire, Corbin & Fitzgerald LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, PREGERSON, Circuit Judge and QUIST, District Judge.
    
      
       The Honorable Gordon J. Quist, United States District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

We review de novo the district court’s order dismissing Nor cent’s complaint for failure to state a claim, taking the facts alleged in the complaint as true and construing them in a light favorable to plaintiff. Les Shockley Racing, Inc. v. Nat’l Hot Rod Ass’n, 884 F.2d 504, 507 (9th Cir.1989). Norcent did not plead facts with adequate specificity to state a claim. See Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007); Kendall v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., 518 F.3d 1042 (9th Cir.2008).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.