Case ID: f-appx_633/html/0210-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David CRAWLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George M. HINKLE; Gregory Holloway; W.R. Hensley; M.B. Sturgill; S.T. Isbell, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 15-7511.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 17, 2016.
    Decided: March 21, 2016.
    . David Edward Crawley, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Ap-pellees.
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Edward Crawley appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crawley v. Hinkle, No. 7:14-cv-00300-MFU-JCH, 2015 WL 5026158 (W.D.Va. Aug. 25, 2015). We deny Crawley’s motion for appointment of counsel and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.