Case ID: ohio-st-3d_65/html/0132-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State ex rel. Jackson, Appellant, v. Lanzinger, Judge, Appellee.
    [Cite as State ex rel. Jackson v. Lanzinger (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 132.]
    (No. 91-2266 —
    Submitted October 13, 1992 —
    Decided November 18, 1992.)
    
      James L. Jackson, pro se.
    
    
      Anthony G. Pizza, Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael C. Mota, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
   The cause is affirmed for the reason stated in the court of appeals’ opinion which denied appellant’s complaint in mandamus for a copy of the transcript of his trial proceedings that “a true and accurate copy of the transcript of proceedings was [already] provided” to him.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.