Case ID: so2d_550/html/0082-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. ANSTEAD, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marvin GARLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 88-2457.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Sept. 20, 1989.
    Rehearing Denied Oct. 25, 1989.
    Marvin Garland, Immokalee, pro se.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, C.J., and WALDEN, J., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., dissents with opinion.

ANSTEAD, Judge,

dissenting.

I would reverse and remand for an evi-dentiary hearing. The transcripts of appellant’s plea proceedings reflect that there is at least an issue of fact as to whether appellant understood the consequences of his plea agreement, which resulted in the imposition of four (4) consecutive minimum mandatory sentences. Appellant’s prior motion for relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 is no bar to his present claim. See Jolly v. State, 392 So.2d 54 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).