Case ID: so3d_165/html/0748-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Phillip MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D14-4164.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 20, 2015.
    Phillip Mitchell, South Bay, pro se.
    
      Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from the circuit court’s summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. We reverse and remand to allow the defendant an opportunity to amend one claim pursuant to Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007), and Alcorn v. State, 121 So.3d 419 (Fla.2013). Counsel may be ineffective for failing to advise a defendant about the maximum possible penalty when conveying a plea offer. Alcorn, 121 So.3d at 426; George v. State, 132 So.3d 366 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). While the defendant alleges that counsel failed to advise him of potential habitual offender sentencing before he rejected a favorable plea, his motion did not comport with Alcorn’s requirements. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to allow the defendant the opportunity and a reasonable amount of time to correct the pleading deficiency associated with that claim if he can do so in good faith. We affirm the summary denial of appellant’s other claim.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.

MAY, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ„ concur.