Case ID: f-appx_710/html/0434-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Homer BERRYHILL, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 17-12496 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    (February 1, 2018)
    R. Brian Tanner, U.S. Attorney Service — Southern District of Georgia, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Savannah, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Homer Berryhill, Pro Se
    Before WILSON, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Marvin Paul Hicks, III, appointed counsel for Homer Berryhill in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Berryhill’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Accordingly, we DENY all remaining motions as moot.