Case ID: sw3d_9/html/0657-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Interest of F.A.F.-P. & E.T.F.-P, Respondents, v. R.T.P., Appellant.
    No. ED 75395.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Oct. 26, 1999.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 5, 2000.
    Deborah C.M. Henry, Clayton, for appellant.
    Cynthia Harcourt-Hearring, Clayton, for respondent.
    Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., P.J., KENT E. KAROHL and MARY K. HOFF, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Father, R.T.P., appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights to his children, F.A.F.-P. and E.T.P.-P.

We have reviewed the record and find the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).