Case ID: nys_93/html/1137-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. SPRING and HISCOCK, JJ.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

KUEHN, Respondent, v. SYRACUSE RAPID TRANSIT RY. CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    May 3, 1905.)
    Action by Frederick W. Kuehn against the Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Order denying motion for new trial on the order to show cause affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, on the opinion of Williams, J., in same case on appeal from judgment and order denying motion for new trial on the minutes. 93 N. Y. Supp. 883.

SPRING and HISCOCK, JJ.,

dissent in opinion and memorandum written by them, respectively, on appeal from judgment and order denying motion for new trial on the minutes. ■