Case ID: me_147/html/0087-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John Pucillo, Jr., pro ami vs. William A. Cummings John Pucillo vs. William A. Cummings
    Sagadahoe.
    Opinion, September 13, 1951.
    
      Harold J. Rubin, for plaintiff.
    
      John W. Quarrington,
    
    
      Charles A. Bartlett, for defendant.
    Sitting: Murchie, C. J., Thaxter, Fellows, Merrill, Nulty, Williamson, JJ.
   Per curiam.

These cases are before this court on the defendants’ exceptions to the refusal of the presiding justice to grant a nonsuit. From the earliest days in this state this court has consistently held that no exceptions lie to the refusal to grant a motion for a nonsuit. The presiding justice should have refused to allow the bill of exceptions. The exceptions must be dismissed as improvidently allowed.

Exceptions dismissed.