Case ID: or_250/html/0515-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued July 12,
    affirmed July 17, 1968
    ANDERSON, Respondent, v. PORTER, Appellant.
    
    443 P. 2d 633
    
      Robert J. Johnston, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.
    
      Frederic P. Roehr III, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Vergeer, Samuels, Cavanaugh & Roehr and Walter H. Sweek, Portland.
    Before Perry, Chief Justice, and Sloan and Goodavin, Justices.
   PER CURIAM.

Action on a promissory note: Defendant appeals a judgment for plaintiff, contending that there was a failure of proof.

Oil the issues made by the pleadings, the plaintiff’s evidence made a question for the trier of fact.

Affirmed.