Case ID: njl_104/html/0649-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CITY OF BURLINGTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, RESPONDENT.
    Argued February 8, 1928
    Decided May 14, 1928.
    
      Eor the appellant, Ernest Walts and V. Claude Palmer.
    
    For the respondent, Bourgeois & Coulomb.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion .delivered by Judge Jess in the Circuit Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfibld, Dear, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.