Case ID: so2d_176/html/0094-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. DREW, Chief Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Burton R. SIGNER and David Marks, Petitioners, v. Samuel ODELL and David Odell, Respondents.
    No. 34008.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    June 9, 1965.
    Garland M. Budd, Miami, for petitioners.
    Richard L. Lapidus, Miami, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

Initial inspection suggested that the decision under review, Odell et al. v. Signer et al., 169 So.2d 851, was prima facie in •conflict with prior decisions of this Court and another District Court. We granted •certiorari to hear arguments on both juris- • diction and merits

After oral arguments and a careful further study of the record and briefs we have •decided that no jurisdictional conflict of •decisions is present. We therefore conclude 'that the writ was improvidently issued and :it must be discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, CALDWELL, ERVIN and BARNS (Retired), JJ., concur.

DREW, C. J., dissents with opinion.

DREW, Chief Justice

(dissenting).

I think we have jurisdiction and that the decision of the District Court is erroneous.