Case ID: ohio-st-3d_79/html/1456-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Monday, July 14, 1997
    
    DISCIPLINARY DOCKET
    97-1131.
    Disciplinary Counsel v. Daniels.
   On June 5, 1997, movant, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a Motion for Order to Show Cause, requesting the court to issue an order directing respondent, Richard J. Daniels, to appear and show cause why he should not be found in contempt of this court for his failure to cooperate in a disciplinary investigation and to comply with a lawfully issued subpoena. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that the motion be, and is hereby, granted to the extent that respondent show cause by filing a written response with the Clerk of this court on or before twenty days from the date of this order why he should not be found in contempt.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.

Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., would also order Richard J. Daniels to appear.