Case ID: or_77/html/0050-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rehearing granted November 14, 1914, reargued February 15,
    former opinion sustained July 13, 1915.
    (See 72 Or. 330.)
    MATLOCK v. MATLOCK.
    (150 Pac. 261.)
    From Lane: Lawrence T. Harris, Judge.
    For appellant there was a brief over the names of Mr. J. M. Pipes, Mr. Lark Bilyeu, and Messrs. Woodcock & Smith, with oral arguments by Mr. Pipes and Mr. Bilyeu.
    
    For respondent there was a brief over the names of Mr. W. H. Wilson and Messrs. Thompson & Hardy, with oral arguments by Mr. Wilson and Mr. C. A. Hardy.
    
    
      Department 1.
   Opinion

Per Curiam.

A rehearing of this canse was granted, but upon a reconsideration of the question involved we conclude the former opinion should be adhered to; and it is so ordered. Former Opinion Sustained.

Mr. Justice Harris took no part in the consideration of this cause.