Case ID: ad3d_18/html/0787-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(May 31, 2005)
    Matthew Betzold et al., Respondents, v Town of Babylon, Appellant.
    [796 NYS2d 680]
   In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.), dated February 19, 2004, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

On May 16, 2000, the infant plaintiff was injured when the front tire of his bicycle hit a pothole located five feet north of his neighbor’s driveway entrance at 84 West 12th Street, in Deer Park. The infant plaintiff and his mother commenced this action against the defendant, Town of Babylon, claiming, inter alia, that the Town caused or created the defective, dangerous condition. The Town moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The Supreme Court denied the motion and we reverse.

The Town made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law establishing that it did not receive the requisite prior written notice of the alleged defective condition. Thus, it was incumbent upon the plaintiffs to submit competent evidence that the Town affirmatively created the defect (see Amabile v City of Buffalo, 93 NY2d 471 [1999]; Schuman v City of New York, 304 AD2d 643 [2003]; ITT Hartford Ins. Co. v Village of Ossining, 257 AD2d 606 [1999]). Under the circumstances, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to the Town’s negligence, and thus, the Town was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see Woodard v City of New York, 262 AD2d 405, 406 [1999]; ITT Hartford Ins. Co. v Village of Ossining, supra). Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.