Case ID: sw3d_497/html/0358-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Keith L. STUBBLEFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 103275
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Filed: August 30, 2016
    Timothy J. Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Keith Stubblefield appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Mov-ant’s motion. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mp. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015). 
      
      . All rule references are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2015) unless otherwise indicated.