Case ID: ny_188/html/0604-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James E. Rock et al., Respondents, v. The Acker Process Company, Appellant. Mary Clifford, Respondent, v. The Acker Process Company, Appellant. Annie F. Joyce et al., Respondents, v. The Acker Process Company, Appellant. John Koelle, Respondent, v. The Acker Process Company, Appellant. Katie Locher, Respondent, v. The Acker Process Company, Appellant. Andrew Wattengel, Respondent, v. The Acker Process Company, Appellant.
    (Argued April 16, 1907;
    decided April 30, 1907.)
    
      Rock v. Acker Process Co., 113 App. Div. 695, affirmed.
    Appeal in each of the above-entitled actions from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 8, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee in an action to restrain an alleged nuisance and to recover damages occasioned thereby.
    
      Mortimer Stiefel for appellant.
    
      P. F. King for respondents.
   Judgments affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, CIi. J., G-bay, Edwabd T. Babtlett, Haight, Webneb, Willabd Babtlett and Hiscook, JJ.