Case ID: ga_261/html/0389-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per curiam. Smith, Presiding Justice,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

S91A0745.
    SEIZ v. J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC.
    (406 SE2d 473)
    Decided July 2, 1991.
    
      Sammy J. Hawkins, for appellant.
    
      Whitehurst & Frick, Stephen P. Riexinger, for appellee.
   Per curiam.

Judgment affirmed without opinion pursuant to Rule 59.

All the Justices concur, except Smith, P. J., who dissents.

Smith, Presiding Justice,

dissenting.

I would reverse this case because I believe, by our action today, we put our stamp of approval on juror misconduct.