Case ID: nj-eq_96/html/0699-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Margaret Moran, guardian, &c., appellant-respondent, v. Mamie Kelley, administratrix, &c., appellant-respondent.
    [Decided October 20th, 1924.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Lewis-, whose opinion is reported in 05-N. J. Eg. 880.
    
    
      Messrs. Drewen & Perkins, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. John Wahl Queen, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons-stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard,. Parker, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd; White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark,. McGlbnnon, Kays—15.

For reversal—None.