Case ID: so2d_779/html/0329-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Scott JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 99-00351.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Dec. 8, 1999.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Timothy J. Ferreri, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Mr. Jones appeals the sentence imposed on his violation of probation. He claims that an unpreserved Karchesky error exists on his sentencing scoresheet. Such an error cannot be reviewed on direct appeal. See State v. Montague, 682 So.2d 1085 (Fla.1996). It is not apparent on the face of the record that a Karchesky error actually exists in this case. We cannot determine whether Mr. Jones’ counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the scoresheet. Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to Mr. Jones’ right to file a timely motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and SALCINES, JJ., Concur. 
      
      . Karchesky v. State, 591 So.2d 930 (Fla. 1992).