Case ID: so2d_622/html/0553-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nellie COHEN and Seymour Cohen, her husband, Appellants, v. SAUNDERS HARDWARE FIVE AND TEN CORPORATION, Appellee.
    No. 92-1855.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Aug. 3, 1993.
    
      Anderson, Moss, Parks & Sherouse and Gary S. Koenigsberg, Miami, for appellants.
    Carey, Dwyer, Eekhart, Mason & Spring and Michael C. Spring, Miami, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and LEVY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final judgment in favor of defendant Saunders Hardware Five and Ten Corporation [Saunders], holding that genuine issues of material fact remain unresolved, including the location where plaintiff Cohen slipped and fell. Additional questions remain as to Saunders’ duty to maintain the area in a reasonably safe condition and its duty to warn invitees of a dangerous condition. See Moore v. Morris, 475 So.2d 666 (Fla.1985); Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Levy v. Home Depot, Inc., 518 So.2d 941 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Shields v. Food Fair Stores of Fla., Inc., 106 So.2d 90 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958).

Reversed and remanded.