Case ID: ad_278/html/0561-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Manocraft Clothes, Inc., Respondent, v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Appellant.
   Judgment unanimously reversed, with costs of this appeal to the appellant, and the complaint dismissed upon the ground that the failure to maintain a watchman as prescribed by the policy, while the premises were not open for business, was a bar to recovery, and judgment is directed to be entered dismissing the complaint herein, with costs. Present — Peek P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.