Case ID: la-app_9/html/0291-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY WHOLE COURT.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 3384
    Second Circuit
    CITY OF MONROE, ET AL. v. COOPER, ET AL. CITY OF MONROE, ET AL. v. BREARD CITY OF MONROE, ET AL. v. HAWKS CITY OF MONROE, ET AL. v. HUDSON CITY OF MONROE, ET AL. v. BREARD, JR.
    No. 3385
    Second Circuit
    No. 3386
    Second Circuit
    No. 3387
    Second Circuit
    No. 3388
    Second Circuit
    (November 12, 1928. Opinion and Decree.)
    H. H. Russell; Theus, Grisham and Davis, of Monroe, attorneys for plaintiffs, appellees.
    Hudson, Potts, Bernstein & Sholars, of Monroe, attorneys for defendants, appellants.
   BY WHOLE COURT.

This Court has no jurisdiction in this case, because the controversy involves the constitutionality or legality of a local improvement assessment imposed by the municipality of the City of Monroe. The Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction in such cases (See Sec. 10, Art. VII, Constitution of 1921).

It is therefore ordered that this case be transferred to the Supreme Court.