Case ID: ohio-st-3d_102/html/1232-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Lundberg Stratton, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hammock, Appellee, v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, Appellant.
    [Cite as Hammock v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 102 Ohio St.3d 1232, 2004-Ohio-2833.]
    (No. 2003-1972
    Submitted April 13, 2004
    Decided June 16, 2004.)
   {¶ 1} The motion for this court to reconsider its judgment entry in Hammock v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 101 Ohio St.3d 1467, 2004-Ohio-819, 804 N.E.2d 41, is denied.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.

Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., concur separately.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

concurring.

{¶ 2} I concur with the decision to deny reconsideration. However, as I stated in my concurring opinion in Fish v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co., 101 Ohio St.3d 1210, 2004-Ohio-224, 802 N.E.2d 149, I believe that Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, 100 Ohio St.3d 216, 2003-Ohio-5849, 797 N.E.2d 1256, applies to all pending cases where a claim has been raised under Scott-Pontzer v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 660, 710 N.E.2d 1116. Here, the appellate court has remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings. The proceedings on remand should include application of Galatis.

Kohnen & Patton, L.L.P., and Colleen M. Blandford, for appellant.

O’Donnell, J., concurs in the foregoing concurring opinion.