Case ID: ad_280/html/0890-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

2639 Corporation, Respondent, v. George Daddis, Appellant, et al., Undertenant.
   Application denied, with $10 costs. Whether or not the Appellate Term ruling as to practical construction of the lease was a correct basis for its determination, we see no necessity for granting leave to appeal on the present record. If the landlord claims that sale of hats, including hats not trimmed with fur, is being continued by the tenant, such claim may be made the subject of a new proceeding. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.