Case ID: sw3d_46/html/0663-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Maurice FREEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 58489.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    June 12, 2001.
    Tara L. Jensen, Asst. Public Defender, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Andrea Mazza Follett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judges.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Freeman appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary-hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.1603).