Case ID: njl_92/html/0524-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SPLITDORE ELECTRICAL COMPANY, A CORPORATION, RESPONDENT, v. ANNA KING, ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND MARGARET KING, APPELLANT.
    Submitted July 8, 1918
    Decided October 11, 1918.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 90 N. J. L. 421.
    Por the appellant, William P. Murphy.
    
    Por the respondent, Kalisch ,& Kalisch.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bergen in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.