Case ID: tenn_6/html/0598-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Wilson v. Drake.
    [.Depositions. — Notice.~\
    
   Per Curiam.

The error assigned is in the rejection, by the judge of the Circuit Court, of a deposition, the notice of the taking of which had been left at the house of the adverse party.

* In North Carolina, WilliaMS and Haywood, Judges, did not agree, being of different opinions. We now decide as follows ; That if notice be left at the residence of the party to be notified, and he be in the house, and conceal himself, or if he be in the neighborhood, that it will be a sufficient service of the notice. But it will be otherwise if he be in a distant part of the State, or in another State. In the latter case service must be on his attorney, and by leaving a notice at his place of residence also. If in the State, he must be personally served.

And the affidavit to prove notice must state his concealment, or being in the neighborhood, at the time of leaving a copy of the notice at the place of his residence. And it must state his being out of the State, when proof is made of notice served on his attorney and of leaving a copy at the house of the principal.

. Judgment accordingly.

See King’s Digest, 5920.