Case ID: sw3d_518/html/0234-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James BOLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 104637
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: March 28, 2017
    Rehearing Denied May 16, 2017
    James Boley, Mineral Point, MO, Pro Se
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent
    Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Boley, acting pro se, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).