Case ID: ohio-st-3d_62/html/0224-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Douglas, J. Wright, J., dissenting.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dayton Bar Association v. Gross.
    [Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Gross (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 224.]
    (No. 91-1251
    Submitted October 15, 1991
    Decided December 18, 1991.)
    
      
      Mark A. Tuss, for relator.
    
      J Robert Gross, pro se.
    
   Douglas, J.

Upon a complete and careful review of this matter, we find that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(1), (3), (4) and (6), and we accept the board’s recommendation that indefinite suspension is the appropriate sanction. Therefore, it is ordered that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in this state. However, under the facts of this case, we find that respondent is entitled to be given credit for the time he has already served since our order of suspension of July 25, 1990. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Sweeney, Holmes, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent.

Wright, J., dissenting.

I would accept the recommendation of the board and not give credit for time served.

Moyer, C.J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.