Case ID: njl_98/html/0901-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BRIDGET SHEEHAN, RESPONDENT, v. EDWARD W. LEE, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE AND FINANCE, AND FREDERICK W. DONNELLY ET AL., THE POLICE AND FIRE COMMISSION OF TRENTON, N. J., APPELLANTS.
    Submitted March 26, 1923
    Decided April 20, 1923.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 96 N. J. L. 341.
    Por the appellants, Katzenbach & Hunt.
    
    Por the respondent, Henry M. Hartman.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Kalis ch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heepenheimer, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.