Case ID: ny_230/html/0592-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Claim of Michael Sabatelli against Vito De Robertis et al., Respondents. State Industrial Commission, Appellant.
    
      Workmen’s Compensation Law — workmen engaged in hazardous occupation, sent by employer to police station to arrange for bail for third party, injured through being pushed, down stairs by policeman —• claim dismissed on ground injury did not arise out of and in course of employment.
    
    
      Sabatelli v. De Robertis, 192 App. Div. 873, affirmed.
    (Argued January 10, 1921;
    decided January 25, 1921.)
    Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 9, 1920, reversing an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law and directing a dismissal of the claim. The claimant was manager and salesman in a pastry, ice cream and confectionery store at 176 First avenue, New York city; next door was a saloon in which the employer had an interest. One Loblino was arrested at the place for carrying a concealed weapon. The claimant’s employer furnished a man to go upon his bail bond, and sent claimant to the police station to see if the bail offered would be accepted; the bondsman offered was accepted, and the defendant with the bondsman and officer went upstairs, presumably, to execute the papers. Claimant, after waiting for them to come downstairs so that he could ride back to bis work in the automobile in which he came to the station, went upstairs to see what caused the delay; at or near the head of the stairs an officer pushed him so that he fell downstairs and broke his leg. The industrial commission awarded claimant compensation. The Appellate Division held that the accident did not arise out of and in the course of claimant’s employment, nor was the service, as designated, hazardous.
    
      Charles D. Newton, Attorney-General (E. C. Aiken of counsel), for appellant.
    
      Joseph Force Crater and Alfred W. Meldon for respondents.
   Order affirmed, with costs against the state industrial commission; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.