Case ID: sw2d_52/html/0053-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PEE CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stanley ORR et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. S. M. N. MARRS et al., Defendants in Error.
    No. 18892.
    Supreme Court of Texas.
    July 6, 1932.
    Woolworth & Baker, of Carthage, for plaintiffs in error.
    Brachfield & Wolfe, of Henderson, for defendants in error.
   PEE CURIAM.

The question as to whether or not the bonds Involved in this suit could have been abrogated or canceled by authority of an election and vote of the people, held for that purpose, is not before us, and we express no opinion upon that question. We have therefore dismissed the application for writ of error under the statute for want of jurisdiction.