Case ID: njl_80/html/0466-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. OTTO KIND AND CHARLES KIND, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.
    Submitted July 11, 1910
    Decided November 14, 1910.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported ante p. 176.
    
    For the plaintiffs in error, Garrison ■&, Voorhees.
    
    
      For the defendant in error, J. Hampton Fithian, prosecutor of the pleas.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice-Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenohard, Bergen, Yoorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Dill, JJ. 10.

For reversal—Yone.