Case ID: ad3d_131/html/0892-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Mildred R., Appellant, v Elizabeth R., Respondent.
    [16 NYS3d 730]
   Order, Family Court, New York County (Marva A. Burnett, Referee), entered on or about August 12, 2014, which, after a fact-finding hearing, dismissed the petition for an order of protection against respondent, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Family Court properly determined that petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case that respondent, her daughter, committed any of the family offenses alleged in the petition to warrant issuance of an order of protection. Petitioner testified in conclusory fashion that her daughter entered her home without permission, stole property, and broke the door, but she did not testify she personally observed her daughter do so, or how she otherwise knew that her daughter committed the alleged offenses (see Matter of Charles E. v Frank E., 72 AD3d 1439 [3d Dept 2010]).

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.