Case ID: njl_105/html/0251-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. ROBERT McGRATH, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued May 16, 1928
    Decided June 22, 1928.
    For the plaintiff in error, King & Vogt.
    
    For the defendant in error, Arthur II. Holland.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per euriam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Minturn, Katzenbach, White, Yan Buskirk, MgGlennon, Kays, Dear, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.