Case ID: so2d_853/html/0570-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. GREEN, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Aboul Howard BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D03-673.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Sept. 3, 2003.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Lisa Walsh, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
    Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Roberta G. Mandel, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before COPE and GREEN, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of State v. Franklin, 836 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (en banc); but nonetheless certify so as to pair them for review with Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); rev. dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla.2002).

GREEN, J.

(specially concurring).

The doctrine of stare decisis compels me to join in the affirmance of this cause, but I continue to adhere to the view that Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), review dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla.2002), was correct in its conclusion that Chapter Law 99-188, Laws of Florida, violates the single subject rule of the Florida Constitution. 
      
      . Judges Cope and Green dissented.