Case ID: f-appx_329/html/0769-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Khanh PHAM, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. Stewart J. RYAN, Warden of California State Prison; et al., Defendants — Appellees.
    No. 08-55506.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 14, 2009.
    
    Filed July 28, 2009.
    Khanh Pham, Corcoran, CA, pro se.
    Tiffany R. Hixson, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, Office of the California Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App: P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Khanh Pham, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 aetion, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. O’Guinn v. Lovelock Corr. Ctr., 502 F.3d 1056, 1059 (9th Cir.2007). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the action because Pham failed to file an administrative appeal within fifteen working days of the alleged incident as required by title 15, section 3084.6(c) of the California Code of Regulations. See Ngo v. Woodford, 539 F.3d 1108, 1110 (9th Cir.2008) (concluding that inmate’s failure to bring timely administrative complaint constitutes non-exhaustion).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.