Case ID: f-appx_297/html/0656-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Adrian NUNEZ-NEVAREZ, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 06-56567.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 16, 2008.
    
    Filed Oct. 27, 2008.
    Tracy L. Wilkison, Esq., USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Adrian Nunez-Nevarez, Adelanto, CA, pro se.
    
      Before: LEAVY, RYMER, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Adrian Nunez-Nevarez, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his motion to correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo, see Tablada v. Thomas, 533 F.3d 800, 805 (9th Cir. 2008), and we affirm.

In district court, Nunez-Nevarez challenged the calculation of his concurrent sentences by the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”). However, as Nunez-Nevarez concedes in his opening brief, this claim fails. See 18 U.S.C. § 3585.

Nunez-Nevarez also contends for the first time on appeal that his sentence is unreasonable. We conclude that Nunez-Nevarez has waived this contention by failing to raise it in his § 2255 motion in district court. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir.1999); Sanchez v. United States, 50 F.3d 1448, 1456 (9th Cir.1995).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.