Case ID: ohio-st_123/html/0666-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Pershing. Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Lederhaus. Cowell, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Sprott. Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Wyre. Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Schick. Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Buser. Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Thomas. Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Doling.
    (Nos. 22314 to 22321, inclusive
    Decided November 19, 1930.)
    
      Mr. Martin 8. Dodd, director of law, and Mr. D. J. O’Rourhe, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Mr. Wesley 8. TJmrstin, for defendants in error.
   It appearing that the Judges of this Court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of these cases, one of the Judges not participating, and are unable for that reason to agree upon judgments, the entry of this fact constitutes an affirmance of the judgments of the Court of Appeals.

Judgments affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Day and Allen, JJ., concur. Kinkade, J., not participating.