Case ID: or-app_27/html/0055-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued September 22,
    affirmed October 4, 1976
    In the Matter of the Dissolution of the Marriage of LELACK, Respondent, and LELACK, Appellant.
    
    (No. 90986, CA 6011)
    554 P2d 635
    
      John L. Hemann, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Garrett, Seideman & Hemann, Salem.
    
      Mark L. B. Wheeler, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Schlegel, Milbank, Wheeler & Jarman, Salem.
    Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Thornton and Tanzer, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

In this dissolution-of-marriage proceeding the appellant-husband contends that the trial court erred in awarding custody of the children to the respondent-mother, in the amount of support awarded and in the property settlement which consisted mostly of a distribution of the family debts. Suffice it to say that we deem the decree of the trial court eminently reasonable in all respects.

Affirmed. Costs to respondent.