Case ID: okla_114/html/0254-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

TULHOMA OIL CO. et al. v. MAYHEW.
    No. 16319
    Opinion Filed April 13, 1926.
    Rehearing Denied May 11, 1926.
    Error from District Court, Noble County; Claude Duval, Judge.
    Action between B. S. Mayhew and the Tul-homa Oil Company and others. From the ■judgment, the latter appeals.
    Reversed and remanded.
    Kleinsehmidt & Johnson, W. M. Bowles, Bell & Fellows, Stanley D. Campbell, and Humphrey & Campbell, for plaintiffs in error.
    Johnston & Paddock, for defendant in error.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon authority of Ellis v. Outler, 25 Okla. 469, 106 Pac. 957, this cause is reversed and remanded for a new trial for failure of the defendant in error to lile a brief as provided in rule 7 of this court.