Case ID: njl_94/html/0262-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. DONALD R. McCORMACK, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued November 18, 1919
    Decided March 1, 1920.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 93 N. J. L. 287.
    For the defendant in error, Fugem Cole.
    
    For the plaintiff in error, Clarence L. Gold'enberg.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Black, White, I-Ieppenttetmer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 11.

For reversal—None.