Case ID: so2d_548/html/0284-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas R. UGARTE, Appellant, v. Sharon UGARTE, Marwin S. Cassel, Receiver, and Howard A. Mesh, C.P.A., Appellees.
    No. 89-1066.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Sept. 5, 1989.
    Stanley Jay Bartel and Sheldon Evans, Miami, for appellant.
    Broad & Cassel and Neil J. Berman and Gary Brookmyer, Miami, for appellees.
    Before NESBITT, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order directing the husband to “liquidate from his IRA account, and/or his Pension Fund, or any other source available to [husband] sufficient funds to pay the [accountant] ... and the Receiver.” Furthermore, appellees conceded at oral argument that the order vests sole discretion in the husband to decide the source of the funds with which to pay the appellees’ fees.

Affirmed.