Case ID: sw3d_477/html/0001-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kevin P. WILSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 101216
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    FILED: May 12, 2015
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 23, 2015
    Application for Transfer Denied September 22, 2015
    Srikant Chigurupati, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Evan Joseph Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Kevin P. Wilson (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Con-elusions of Law and Judgment on Movant’s Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request . for Evidentiary Hearing denying Movant’s Rule 29.15 claims for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating, the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).