Case ID: pa-super_60/html/0340-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Head, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dunn-Salmon Co. v. Edwards, Appellant.
    Argued Feb. 23, 1915.
    Appeal, No. 7, February T., 1915, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Tioga Co., May T., 1914, No. 233, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Dunn-Salmon Company, Incorporated under the laws of New York v. Arthur Edwards.
    Before Rice, P. J., Oread y, Head, Kephart and Trexler, JJ.
    Affirmed.
    
      July 21, 1915:
   Opinion by

Head, J.,

The facts in the present appeal are identical in every respect with those in the case of Putney Shoe Company v. Edwards, in which an opinion has this day been filéd, ante, page 338. For the reasons there given we must hold the conclusion reached by the learned trial judge was the correct one. The assignments of error are consequently overruled and the judgment is affirmed.