Case ID: nh_120/html/0446-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hillsborough
    No. 79-418
    Cameron K. Wehringer v. Mary S. Bullen
    June 18, 1980
    
      Cameron K. Wehringer, by brief, pro se.
    
      Hatfield & Henderson, of Hillsborough, by brief for the defendant.
   Memorandum Opinion

Plaintiff sought specific performance of a contract to purchase land from the defendant. The Trial Court {Goode, J.) found that the contract price of $30 per acre for land worth $200 per acre was “so grossly inadequate as to shock the conscience of the court,” that the defendant was recently widowed and emotionally weakened at the time of the contract and that she was without legal advice. It was also found that the plaintiff, an attorney, had entered into a very personal relationship with the defendant and had performed legal service for her without charge.

The court denied specific performance, relying upon Gregoire v. Paradis, 100 N.H. 21, 117 A.2d 328 (1955) for the proposition that specific performance is a discretionary remedy, depending upon the facts of each case, and is not to be decreed as a matter of right. Because the evidence supports the trial court’s findings, they will not be disturbed. Laconia Clinic, Inc. v. Cullen, 119 N.H. 804, 408 A.2d 412 (1979). The discretionary denial of specific performance was proper. Gulf Oil Co. v. Rybicki, 102 N.H. 51, 149 A.2d 877 (1959); see American Home Improvement Co. v. MacIver, 105 N.H. 435, 201 A.2d 886 (1964).

Affirmed.