Case ID: so2d_782/html/0867-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cedric FRASER, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Respondent.
    No. SC95506.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    March 22, 2001.
    Carl H. Lida, Plantation, FL, for Petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Respondent.
    Katherine Fernandez Rundle, State Attorney, and Israel Reyes, Assistant State Attorney, Miami, Florida; Law Office of Robert S. Glazier, Miami, FL; and Jonathan Goodman of Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson, P.A., on behalf of the City of Hollywood, Miami, FL, for the Office of the State Attorney in and for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, on behalf of the Members of the South Florida Impact Task Force, Amicus Curiae.
   PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision in Fraser v. Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, 727 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), based on alleged express and direct conflict under article V, section 3(b)(3), of the Florida Constitution. Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this case.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.