Case ID: so2d_590/html/0442-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Maria KANE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Alfred B. Kane, Appellant, v. Marilyn LORD, Michelle Lord, Ellen Lord, and Debra Lord Hirsh, Appellees.
    No. 91-848.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Sept. 24, 1991.
    On Motion for Rehearing Dec. 31, 1991.
    Tescher, Chaves & Hochman and Donald R. Tescher, Miami, for appellant.
    Peter M. MacNamara, Miami, for appel-lees.
    Before NESBITT, BASKIN and GODERICH, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Spohr v. Berryman, 564 So.2d 241 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Scutieri v. Estate of Revitz, 510 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), review denied, 519 So.2d 986 (Fla.1988); Harbour House Properties, Inc. v. Estate of Stone, 443 So.2d 136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellant’s motion for rehearing and reverse the order under review based on the authority of Spohr v. Berryman, 589 So.2d 225 (Fla.1991).

Reversed.