Case ID: njl_127/html/0228-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HILDA P. PLOG, RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF CLIFTON, APPELLANT.
    Argued May 22, 1941 —
    Decided September 19, 1941.
    Por the respondent, Mendelsohn & Mendelsohn.'
    Por the appellant, John Q. Dluh-y.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bodine, Peeskie, Poetee, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Raffeety, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.