Case ID: ad3d_67/html/1459-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stephen DiMarco, Appellant, v Patrick J. Bombard, Individually and as a Member of Bombard Buick Pontiac GMC Truck, LLC, et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Stephen DiMarco, Appellant, v Patrick J. Bombard, Individually and as a Member of 100 Main Street, LLC, et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)
    [887 NYS2d 922]
   Motion for reargument granted and, upon reargument, the memorandum and order entered October 2, 2009 (66 AD3d 1341 [2009]) is amended by adding the following sentence as the last sentence of the memorandum: “Even assuming, arguendo, that the affidavit of plaintiffs attorney, which purports to outline the terms of the stipulation, constitutes a sufficient record upon which we may review plaintiffs contention that the court erred in vacating the settlement agreement, we would nevertheless affirm.” Present—Scudder, EJ., Hurlbutt, Peradotto, Green and Gorski, JJ.