Case ID: us_389/html/0011-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam. Mr. Justice Douglas", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RHOADES et al. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ABINGTON TOWNSHIP et al.
    No. 225.
    Decided October 9, 1967.
    
      Franklin C. Salisbury for appellants.
    
      William C. Bennett, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, John P. McCord, Deputy Attorney General, and Edward Friedman for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and William B. Ball for Paul et al., appellees.
   Per Curiam.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Douglas

is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.