Case ID: ad3d_133/html/0837-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Griffin, Appellant.
    [19 NYS3d 432]
   Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Dwyer, J.), dated September 18, 2014, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The People sustained their burden of demonstrating, by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendant properly received a level three classification pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C [hereinafter SORA]) under the circumstances of this case (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 571 [2009]; People v Bright, 63 AD3d 1133, 1134 [2009]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied his request for a downward departure to a level two classification, as the defendant failed to identify and establish the existence of a mitigating factor which was not adequately taken into account by the SORA Guidelines and which would warrant a downward departure in the exercise of the court’s discretion (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 [2014]; People v Sooknanan, 119 AD3d 540 [2014]; People v Harris, 93 AD3d 704, 705-706 [2012]; People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112, 128 [2011]). Mastro, J.R, Dickerson, Miller and Maltese, JJ., concur.