Case ID: sw3d_525/html/0215-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jasmine ARMSTRONG, Appellant, v. The SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD OF the TRANSITIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS and St. Louis Public Schools, Respondents, and Joseph Guasto, Defendant.
    No. ED 104929
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    FILED: August 22, 2017
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Kyle Anthony Kleefuss, 1708 Olive Street, St. Louis, MO 63103, Law offices of Deraid L. Gab, PC.
    ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Jerina Dominique Phillips, Bridget Gente-man Hoy, Co-Counsel, 600 Washing Avenue, Suite 2500, St, Louis, MO 63101, LEWIS RICE LLC.
    Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jasmine Armstrong appeals from the trial court’s “Order and Judgment” granting summary judgment in favor of the Special Administrative Board of the Transitional School District of the City of St. Louis and the St. Louis Public Schools District. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).