Case ID: sw_168/html/0095-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DAYIDSON, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RUSSELL v. STATE.
    (No. 3160.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    June 10, 1914.)
    1. Criminal Law (§ 1099*) — Statement of Facts — Settlement, Signing, and Filing.
    A statement of facts, not signed by the attorneys, nor approved by the court, will not be considered on appeal.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2866-2880; Dee. Dig. § 1099.*]
    2. Criminal Law (§ 1092*) — Bill of Exceptions — Settlement, Signing, and Filing.
    A bill of exceptions, which does not show that it was filed in the trial court, though approved by the judge, will not be considered on appeal.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2803, 2829, 2834-2861, 2919; Dec. Dig. § 1092.*]
    Appeal from Milam County Court; John Watson, Judge.
    John Russell was convicted of misdemean- or theft, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Lyles & Lyles, of Cameron, for appellant. C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   DAYIDSON, J.

Appellant was convicted of misdemeanor theft. The statement of facts found in the record was not signed by the attorneys, nor approved by tbe court. Therefore it cannot be considered.

There is a bill of exceptions in the record also; but this does not show to have been filed in the trial court, although approved by the judge. As these matters are presented, they cannot be considered .by the court, and in their absence the matters urged for reversal cannot be reviewed.

The judgment is affirmed.