Case ID: nj-eq_83/html/0688-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Floyd H. Bradley, receiver, &c., appellant, v. United Wireless Telegraph Company, respondent.
    [Submitted July 6th, 1914.
    Decided October 1st, 1914.]
    On appeal from a decree of the conrt of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning, whose opinion is reported in 79 N. J. Eq. J/.B8.
    
    
      Messrs. French & Richards, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. William S. Darnell, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Viee-Chancel- ■ lor Learning.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Bogert, Heppenheijtee, Williams — 12.

For reversal — None.