Case ID: ga-app_36/html/0090-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

17528.
    Rogers v. Hughes et al.
    
    Decided November 9, 1926.
    Complaint; from Gordon superior court — Judge Tarver. May-24, 1926.
    
      J. M. Lang, for plaintiff. M. B. Eubanlcs, for defendants.
    Appeal and Error, 4 C. J. p. 858, n. 3.
   Broyles, C. J.

The evidence, while in acute conflict, authorized the verdict, and the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial show no cause for another hearing of the case.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.