Case ID: f-appx_326/html/0137-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew Lewis PRIVOTT, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-6310.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 21, 2009.
    Decided: June 1, 2009.
    
      Andrew Lewis Privott, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Andrew Lewis Privott appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(a) motion to correct purported errors in his presentence investigation report (“PSR”). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Privott, No. 2:02-cr-00090-JBF-FBS-1 (E.D.Va. Feb. 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.