Case ID: nj-eq_99/html/0424-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rose E. Fike, respondent, v. Roy E. Fike, appellant.
    [Decided February 1st, 1926.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised hy Vice-Chancellor Buchanan, whose opinion is reported in 8 N. J. Mis. B. J/8B.
    
    .Messrs. McCarter & English, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. Robert Newton Crane, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below hy Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Pabkee, Mintuen, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gaedneb, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 15.

For reversal — Kone.