Case ID: sw2d_34/html/0598-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MORROW, P. J. HAWKINS, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WRIGHT v. STATE.
    No. 13947.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Dec. 3, 1930.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 21, 1931.
    McKinney & Berry, of Cooper, for appellant.
    Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for tbe State.
   MORROW, P. J.

Tbe unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor is tbe offense; penalty, confinement in tbe penitentiary for one year.

Tbe record is here without statement of facts and bills of exceptions. No fault is perceived in tbe procedure.

Tbe judgment is affirmed.

HAWKINS, J., absent.

On Motion for Rehearing.

HAWKINS, J.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is apparently predicated upon tbe assumption that an indictment charging the transportation of intoxicating liquor is not good unless it is averred that such transportation is for the purpose of sale: This is not the law. See Crowley v. State, 92 Tex. Cr. R. 103, 242 S. W. 472; Harrison v. State, 95 Tex. Cr. R. 513, 254 S. W. 975; Turner v. State, 95 Tex. Cr. R. 593, 255 S. W. 439; Harper v. State, 96. Tex. Cr. R. 429, 257 S. W. 1102; Bailey v. State, 97 Tex. Cr. R. 312, 260 S. W. 1057; Gandy v. State, 99 Tex. Cr. R. 143, 268 S. W. 951; Brown v. State, 101 Tex. Cr. R. 495, 276 S. W. 438.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.