Case ID: nys_95/html/1125-09.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DICKEY, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL RY. CO., Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    November 29, 1905.)
    Action by Adam Dickey against the International Railway Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with costs. Held, that it must be assumed that the order granting the motion for a new trial was granted, upon the ground, among others, that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence, and that, this being so, said order should be affirmed, without passing upon the question whether, as matter of law, the plaintiff was entitled to go to the jury.