Case ID: nj-eq_104/html/0206-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

South Camden Trust Company, respondent, v. Michael Stiefel, appellant.
    [Decided February 4th, 1929.]
    
      Messrs. Siarr, Summerill & Lloyd, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. J oseph BecJc Taylor, for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning, and reported in 101 N. J. Eq. 41.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, ■ Kalisch, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Bus-kirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.