Case ID: misc_31/html/0813-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Hascall, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Maud Van Buren Holme, Respondent, v. Thomas E. Crimmins, Appellant.
    Appeal from an order granting, in part only, a bill of particulars, and denying motion therefor in part.
    Henry A. Robinson (John T. Little, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.
    Thomas E. Wing, for respondent.
   Hascall, J.

We think the appellant entitled to the full relief sought. It seems, from the papers before us, that the items refused below were quite proper and necessary and should follow those ordered by the Special Term.

So much of the order appealed from as denies further particulars is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements and defendant’s demand in the notice already served is granted.

McCarthy, J., concurs.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs.