Case ID: ad_235/html/0623-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Allie Rosenfeld, Appellant, v. Edward B. Hittleman, Respondent.
   Order denying plaintiff’s motion for an injunction pendente lite affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In the circumstances the denial was not error and, under the rule in Schenck v. Underhill (205 App. Div. 162), the exercise of discretion by the Special Term should not be disturbed. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.