Case ID: f-appx_291/html/0038-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy John BOULE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-30378.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Aug. 4, 2008.
    Filed Aug. 14, 2008.
    Eric B. Wolff, Esquire, USBI-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    John P. Rhodes, Esquire, FDMT-Federal Defenders of Montana, Missoula, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

The United States Attorney’s Office has represented that if a hearing is held it will defer to the judgment of Timothy Boule’s probation officer, who does not believe further incarceration is necessary for the alleged violation at issue in this appeal. The hearing, therefore, would be pro forma. This court construes the government’s statement as agreement that no hearing is necessary and so none will be sought. The appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.