Case ID: so2d_603/html/0510-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. GRIMES, Justice,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Henry LANE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 78534.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Sept. 3, 1992.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Ellen Morris, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Joan Fowler, Bureau Chief, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen. and Joseph A. Tringali, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon the authority of Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla.1992), we quash State v. Lane, 582 So.2d 77 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), and remand with directions to reinstate Lane’s community control and probation.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

GRIMES, J., dissents with an opinion, in which HARDING, J., concurs.

McDONALD, J., dissents.

GRIMES, Justice,

dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla.1992).

HARDING, J., concurs.