Case ID: f-appx_612/html/0584-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William E. JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-10018
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Aug. 11, 2015.
    Adam W. Overstreet, Kenyen Ray Brown, Vicki M. Davis, Michele Carstens O’Brien, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    William Gregory Hughes, W. Gregory Hughes, PC, Mobile, AL, for Defendant Appellant.
    Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

William Gregory Hughes, appointed counsel for William E. Jackson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396; 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jackson’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.