Case ID: sw2d_870/html/0478-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Margaret GORDON, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Lawrence HERRON, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. 63670.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Feb. 22, 1994.
    Lori Koch, Goffstein, Kraus, Sherman, Seigel & Weinberg, St. Louis, for defendant/appellant.
    Richard C. Homire, Homire & Wilkes, P.C., St. Louis, for plaintiff-respondent.
    Before CRANE, P.J., and KAROHL and CRAHAN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment in a negligence action for property damage resulting from an automobile collision. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence and no error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).