Case ID: f3d_567/html/1142-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael Robert PULIDO, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Chris CHRONES, Respondent-Appellant. Michael Robert Pulido, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Chris Chrones, Respondent-Appellee.
    Nos. 05-15916, 05-16308.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    June 9, 2009.
    J. Bradley O’Connell, First District Appellate Project, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner-Appellee/Petitioner-Appellant.
    Michael Robert Pulido, Corcoran, CA, pro se.
    Jeremy E. Friedlander, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent-AppellanVRespondent-Appellee.
    Before: ALFRED T. GOODWIN, DIARMUID F. O’SCANNLAIN, and SIDNEY R. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

Petitioner-Appellant’s Petition for Reconsideration of Dispositive Order, filed with this court on March 31, 2009 is GRANTED. The Order remanding the case, filed March 20, 2009 is VACATED.

Petitioner-Appellant’s Motion to file Supplemental Brief Following Supreme Court Remand, filed March 10, 2009 is GRANTED and Petitioner-Appellant’s Supplemental Brief is ordered FILED.

Respondent-Appellant is directed to file a responsive brief to Petitioner-Appellee’s Supplemental Brief to address the application of the harmless error standard of Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619, 113 S.Ct. 1710, 123 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993). Respondent-Appellant shall respond within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, and Respondent-Appellant shall provide this court with ten (10) copies.