Case ID: so2d_670/html/0190-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mirta ORTEGA, Appellant, v. Omar ORTEGA, Appellee.
    No. 95-2910.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 27, 1996.
    Anthony Dieguez, for appellant.
    Frank U. Pintado, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Because the parties properly stipulated at oral argument that an additional twelve hours of work should be imputed to the husband for the purposes of calculating temporary alimony and child support, we reverse and remand this case for an imputation of income to the husband and a recalculation of his temporary alimony and child support obligations.

Reversed and remanded with directions.