Case ID: f2d_455/html/0521-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert W. O’CONNELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 29984.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    March 14, 1972.
    Before THORNBERRY, COLEMAN and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.

The judgment below is affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 
      
      . In his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, appellant has alleged that his guilty plea was coerced by the eleven-month delay between his indictment and his arraignment, and consequently was denied the opportunity of having his federal sen-fence run concurrently with a state sentence imposed prior to his indictment.
     
      
      . See N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Clothing-Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.