Case ID: njl_104/html/0447-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. MICHAEL CORTESE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued October 27, 1927
    Decided December 15, 1927.
    For the defendant in error, Joseph L. Smith.
    
    For the plaintiff in error, Harold Simandl.
    
   Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance, — Trencitabd, Mintuen, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.