Case ID: f-appx_87/html/0435-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Derron HOSKINS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-60784.
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Feb. 18, 2004.
    William Chadwick Lamar, Assistant US Attorney, Oxford, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    
      Derron Hoskins, pro se, Yazoo City, MS, for Defendantr-Appellant.
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Court-appointed counsel for Derron Hoskins has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Hoskins was sent a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but he has not filed a response. Hoskins filed a motion for an extension of time until January 24, 2004, to file a pro se appellate brief. This motion for extension of time is DENIED.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.