Case ID: ad_247/html/0761-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: Henry Villaume, Judgment Creditor, Respondent, v. Mary Nelson and Max Rothstein, as Executors, etc., of Julius Nelson, Deceased, Judgment Debtors; Max Rothstein, as Executor, etc., of Julius Nelson, Deceased, Appellant.
   In supplementary proceedings under a judgment against executors in their representative capacity, order denying motion to vacate subpoena reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion, the recent amendment to the Civil Practice Act, relating to supplementary proceedings (Laws of 1935, chap. 630), has not changed the effect of the rulings in Collins v. Beebe (54 Hun, 318) and Jones v. Arkehburgh (112 App. Div. 483) that supplementary proceedings may not be maintained against executors or administrators in their representative capacity. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur. [See ante, p. 757.]