Case ID: f-appx_435/html/0867-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Kevin PUCKETT, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 10-14144
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    July 25, 2011.
    Donna Barrow Dobbins, Eugene Seidel, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Steven E. Butler, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Raymond Arthur Pierson, Attorney at Law, Mobile, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    
      Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and FAY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Raymond A. Pierson, appointed,, counsel for James Kevin Puckett in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Puckett’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.