Case ID: so2d_578/html/0004-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Julio JORRIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 89-2428.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Feb. 26, 1991.
    On Motion for Rehearing April 25, 1991.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
    
      Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

We grant the appellant’s timely motion for rehearing in part, reiterate our per curiam affirmance, and certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance:

DOES AN AGREEMENT WHEREBY A CONVICTED DRUG TRAFFICKER WILL RECEIVE A SUBSTANTIALLY REDUCED SENTENCE IN EXCHANGE FOR SETTING UP NEW DRUG DEALS VIOLATE THE HOLDING IN STATE V. GLOSSON, 462 S0.2D 1082 (FLA.1985)?

COBB, W. SHARP and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.