Case ID: neb_1/html/0408-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Lake, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The Midland Pacific Railroad Co. v. Newman.
    1. The decision in the preceding case of The Midland. Pacific Jlailroad .Company y. McCartney, affirmed.
    This, like the preceding case, was brought up by petition in error, from the - District Court of Otoe county. • It was argued in connection with that cause.
    
      /S. H. Calhoun and J. H, Croxton, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      I. N. Shambaugh, for defendant in error. .....
   Lake, J.

The record in this ease presents precisely the same questions as have already been passed upon in the case, of The-Midland Pacific Railroad v. McCartney, decided at this term of the court. . .

For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment of the District Court in this must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.