Case ID: f-appx_188/html/0538-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Roy HOGGARD, II, Appellant, v. Mildred DALE, Sgt., Cummins Unit, ADC; John Doe, Assistant Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Appellees.
    No. 05-3668.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 7, 2006.
    Filed: July 12, 2006.
    
      Roy Hoggard, II, Grady, AR, pro se.
    Christine Ann Cryer, Attorney General’s Office, Little Rock, AR, for Appellees.
    Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Arkansas state prisoner Roy Hoggard appeals following the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment and its denial of several post-judgment motions in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude dismissal of the complaint was proper for the reasons explained by the district court. We also conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the post-judgment motions. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. 47A(a). 
      
      . The Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c).