Case ID: f-appx_37/html/0906-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gonzalo CASTANEDA-HERNANDEZ, aka Gonzalo Castenada, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 01-10500.
    D.C. No. CR-01-00089-RCC.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted June 10, 2002 .
    Decided June 18, 2002.
    Before RYMER, T.G. NELSON and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, appellant’s request for oral argument is denied. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Gonzalo Castaneda-Hernandez appeals his guilty plea conviction and the 57-month sentence imposed for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Castaneda-Hernandez’s attorney has moved to 'withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), on the ground that the appeal presents no non-frivolous issues.

Because our independent review of the record discloses no arguable issues, counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted and the judgment is

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.