Case ID: ohio-st-3d_64/html/0505-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State ex rel. Chrysler Motors Corporation, Appellant, v. Mayfield, Admr., et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as State ex rel. Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Mayfield (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 505.]
    
      (No. 91-766
    Submitted May 12, 1992
    Decided September 2, 1992.)
    
      Mansour, Gavin, Gerlack & Manos Co., L.P.A., Jeffrey M. Embleton and Robert JS'. Blackham, for appellant.
    
      Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Jeffery W. Clark, for appellees.
   Per Curiam.

Subsequent to the decision below and the filing of briefs before this court, Brady v. Safety-Kleen Corp. (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 624, 576 N.E.2d 722, was decided. That decision invalidated R.C. 4121.80 in its entirety, negating any right to reimbursement of settlement money and attorney fees in this case.

For this reason, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Wright, J., concurs in judgment only.

H. Brown, J., not participating.