Case ID: f-appx_265/html/0462-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos BARAJAS-ROMO, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-50398.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Jan. 22, 2008.
    Mark R. Rehe, Esq., Matthew Gardner, Joseph S. Green, USSD—Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Matthew C. Shaftel, Esq., Janet Tung Fax, FDSD—Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    
      Before KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, KLEINFELD and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER AMENDING MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION AND DENYING PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

The Memorandum disposition filed on August 7, 2007, is amended to reflect the recent decision in United States v. Salazar-Lopez, 506 F.3d 748 (9th Cir.2007). With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and to deny the petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petitioner for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are denied.

No further petitions for rehearing and or petitions for rehearing en banc shall be entertained.