Case ID: ark_321/html/0617-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jimmy L. KING v. STATE of Arkansas
    CR 95-884
    906 S.W.2d 306
    Supreme Court of Arkansas
    Opinion delivered September 25, 1995
    
      Thomas A. Potter, for appellant.
    No response.
   Per Curiam.

Jimmy L. King moves for a rule on the clerk to file the record in his appeal. In the circumstances presented, we treat the motion as one for a belated appeal. The record has been refused because the notice of appeal was not filed in a timely manner. It was more than 30 days after a new trial motion was deemed denied pursuant to Ark. R. App. P. 4(c).

Mr. King’s counsel Thomas A. Potter acknowledges that the notice of appeal was untimely and by affidavit he assumes full responsibility for the error. The failure of counsel to perfect an appeal in a criminal case constitutes a denial of effective assistance of counsel and is good cause for granting a belated appeal. Gay v. State, 288 Ark. 589, 707 S.W.2d 320 (1986). A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.