Case ID: f-appx_586/html/0163-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darrell R. JOHNS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 14-30055
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Dec. 2, 2014.
    Carol Mignonne Griffing, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Robert Watts Gillespie, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Shreveport, LA, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.
    John Broocks Greer, III, Broocks Greer, L.L.C., Shreveport, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before PRADO, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Darrell R. Johns has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Johns has filed a response asserting that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and challenging the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress, the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction, and the district court’s denial of his pretrial pro se motion for the appointment of new counsel.

The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Johns’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to Johns raising them on collateral review. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Johns’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     
      
      . See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.2014), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 123, — L.Ed.2d-(2014).
     
      
      . See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.