Case ID: ohio-law-abs_8/html/0419-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PARDEE, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HOSTETLER v NATIONAL ACCEPTANCE CO
    Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Medina Co
    No 98.
    Decided May 6, 1930
    John F. Wilson, Hillsboro and Harold H. Gorman for Hostetler.
    C. W. White, Akron and A. R. Doak, Akron, for Acceptance Co.
   Opinion by

PARDEE, J.

FUNK, PJ. and WASHBURN, J„ concur.

SYLLABUS

The holder of a chattel mortgage upon an automobile who permits the mortgagor, a retail automobile dealer, to place said automobile upon its salesroom floor for the purpose of sale to one who might be attracted ■thereby, will not be permitted to assert its mortgage against an innocent purchaser, who bought the car from said dealer in the ordinary retail way for value and without actual notice of such mortgage.

Fufi opinion will be published later. Watch Omnibus Index.