Case ID: f2d_790/html/0442-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Curtis Michael RICHENDOLLAR, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. DIAMOND M DRILLING COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, and Baker Shipyards, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 84-2492.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    May 28, 1986.
    Joseph J. Weigand, Jr., Weigand, Weigand & Meyer, Houma, La., White, Huseman, Pletcher & Powers, Bradford M. Condit, Corpus Christi, Tex., for Diamond M Drilling Co.
    Herbert W. Barnes, Michael J. Samanie, Houma, La., for Richendollar.
    Richard A. Schwartz, Thelem, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges, Houston, Tex., for Baker Shipyards, Inc. & Baker Marine.
   ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion March 5, 1986, 5 Cir., 1986, 784 F.2d 580)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, HILL, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc without oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.