Case ID: us_386/html/0280-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

McCLELLAN v. CALIFORNIA.
    No. 69,
    Mise.
    Decided March 13, 1967.
    Petitioner pro se. ' "..
    
      Thomas C. Lynch, -Attorney General of .California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Philip C. Griffin, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The -judgment is vacated, and the case remanded for further 'consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.