Case ID: sc_189/html/0101-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

14788
    GOODRICH SILVERTOWN, INC., v. ROGERS ET AL.
    
    (200 S. E., 91)
    
      
      Messrs. Price & Poag and Blease & Griffith, for appellant,
    
      Messrs. Hingson & Todd, for respondent,
    December 9, 1938.
   Per curiam.

We think that the two questions presented by the appeal in this case, one having to do with the doctrine of accession and the other with the recording acts, were properly disposed of by the Circuit Judge, and we apjprove the result of his decree. Under the admitted facts, the conclusion reached by him as to the first finds general support in the authorities, while his disposition of the second is clearly sustained by our own decisions, including Perkins v. Loan & Exchange Bank, 43 S. C., 39, 20 S. E., 759, relied on by the appellant.

The Circuit order, therefore, which will be reported, is affirmed.

Mr. Chiee Justice Stabler and Messrs. Justices Bonham, Baker and FishburnE concur.

Mr. Justice Carter did not participate on account of illness.