Case ID: f-appx_47/html/0211-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Phillip Anthony DAYE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B.J. BARNES, Sheriff; Willardean Dula, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 02-6941.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 5, 2002.
    Decided Sept. 11, 2002.
    Phillip Anthony Daye, Appellant Pro Se. Susan D. Moore, County Attorney’s Office, Greensboro, North Carolina; Perry Cleveland Henson, Sr., Amanda Mary Willis, Henson & Henson, L.L.P., Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    
      Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Phillip Anthony Daye appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2002) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Daye v. Barnes, No. CA-01-94-1 (M.D.N.C. May 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.