Case ID: ga-l-rep_1/html/0003-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Jackson, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DECISIONS OF THE SUPPEME COUHT OF GEORGIA,
    
      Rendered October 14, 1885.
    
    Benning vs. Barlow, et al.
    
    Trespass from Lumpkin. Practice in Superior Court. New Trial. (Before Judge Estes.)
    [Blandford, J., being disqualified, did not preside in this case.]
   Jackson, C. J.

It furnished no ground for any extraordinary motion for a new trial at a later term of Court, that,the case was tried near the clo-se of a terra, and counsel did not have time to perfect the motion for a m-w trial, where it appears that, after the trial, the Court drew juries and did other things usual at the heel of aterra; that the dis-. satisfied p’irf.y could have made a motion, and taken an order to perfect .it and file n brief of the evidence afterwards, but that this was neglected Without any sufficient excuse therefor, and that nothing was done until the next term of Court.

Wier Boyd ; M. G. Boyd, for plaintiff in error.

H. H. Perry; W. P. Price, for defendants.

Judgment affirmed