Case ID: ad2d_267/html/0098-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin Smith, Appellant.
    [699 NYS2d 407]
   —Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (George Daniels, J.), rendered February 23, 1998, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 8 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. When the police observed defendant engaging in suspicious behavior, including adjustment of his waistband, in a drug prone location, and observed a large bulge with the shape of a weapon in his waistband (see, People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210, 221), they at least had a founded suspicion of criminality justifying a common-law inquiry. After they approached and got a better look at the bulge, they were convinced that it had the configuration of a machine pistol or large semiautomatic pistol (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 762). Moreover, defendant refused to cooperate and reached toward his waistband (see, People v Benjamin, 51 NY2d 267). These factors amply provided reasonable suspicion, and at the very least permitted the police to touch the bulge (see, People v Moret, 240 AD2d 321, lv denied 90 NY2d 908). The large brick of cocaine was only exposed during defendant’s struggle with the officers which provided probable cause to arrest defendant and to seize what was apparently contraband. Accordingly, the physical evidence and statements were not fruits of an unlawful seizure. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Wallach, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.