Case ID: fla_144/html/0437-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. L. Sauls, et al., v. Hardee Farms & Ranch, Inc.
    198 So. 99
    En Banc
    Opinion Filed October 15, 1940
    
      
      W. W. Whitehurst, for Appellants;
    
      Latimer C. Farr and Leitner & Leitner, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

On appeal, appellants challenge the action of the chancellor in closing the time for taking testimony and refusing to open or extend the time for taking testimony beyond the date theretofore fixed by the order of the chancellor.

They also challenge the sufficiency of the testimony to support the decree of the chancellor.

We have examined the record in the light of the briefs and find no reversible error. 1

The decree is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Whitfield, Brown, Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Chapman, J., dissents.