Case ID: sw2d_53/html/1114-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MORROW, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Chestene HANCOCK v. STATE.
    No. 15664.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Nov. 9, 1932.
    Mathis & Mathis and R. G. Allen, Jr., all of Houston, for appellant.
    O’Brien Stevens, Dist. Atty., and E. T. Branch, both of Houston, and Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.
   MORROW, P. J.

The offense is burglary; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Neither bills of exception'nor statement of facts accompany the record.

In the motion for new trial, appellant complains of some arguments charged to have been made. The complaint, however, is not supported by any bills of exception.

No error having been perceived, the judgment is affirmed.

HAWKINS, J., not sitting.