Case ID: njl_117/html/0101-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SAMUEL SLAVIN, RESPONDENT, v. FRANCIS H. LEGGETT & COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Argued February 4, 1936
    Decided May 14, 1936.
    For the respondent, Manuel Weiner.
    
    For the appellant, Edwards, Smith & Dawson.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Bodine, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 7.

For reversal — The Chief Justice, Heher, Wells, JJ. 3.