Case ID: sw2d_911/html/0671-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John W. HEBB, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. 68386.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Dec. 5, 1995.
    Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J. and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).