Case ID: njl_103/html/0207-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DAVID WILENSKY, APPELLANT, v. GEORGIA CASUALTY COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
    Submitted May 28, 1926
    Decided October 18, 1926.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N. J. Mis. R. 95.
    For the appellant, Ward & McGinnis.
    
    For the respondent, Frank G. Turner.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, KaLISH, KaTZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.