Case ID: so2d_372/html/1011-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BLACK, CROW & EIDSNESS, INC., Petitioner, v. ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY OF FLORIDA, INC., Respondent.
    No. 78-2266.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    July 11, 1979.
    Stephen M. Bull of Lawrence, Bull, Palmer & Dick, Orlando, for petitioner.
    Larry R. Leiby and Stewart J. Bellus of Kavanaugh & Leiby, Miami, and Trotter, Bondurant, Griffin, Miller & Hishon, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

This cause commenced upon the filing of a notice of appeal from an interlocutory order denying a motion for summary judgment. Pursuant to petitioner’s motion to amend the notice of appeal the cause has been treated as a petition for writ of common law certiorari. As such, certiorari is denied. See Chalfonte Development Corp. v, Beaudoin, 370 So.2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).

CERTIORARI DENIED.

DOWNEY, C. J., and ANSTEÁD and MOORE, JJ., concur.