Case ID: sw3d_7/html/0412-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Keith BAIN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 75702.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Sept. 21, 1999.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied. Dec. 1, 1999.
    Application for Transfer Denied Jan. 25, 2000.
    
      Jason S. Marks, St. Louis, for appellant.
    John Munson Morris, III, Barbara K. Chesser, Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before: RHODES RUSSELL, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).