Case ID: ad2d_190/html/0863-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rodolfo Grey, Appellant.
   — Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Heller, J.), rendered October 30, 1989, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence adduced at the trial in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The court’s charge to the jury, viewed as a whole, adequately conveyed to the jury the proper standards for evaluating the evidence presented (see, People v Canty, 60 NY2d 830).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit (see, People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245; People v Charleston, 56 NY2d 886; People v Robinson, 137 AD2d 564). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.