Case ID: conn_251/html/0924-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MCDONALD, C. J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES v. SULLIVAN ASSOCIATES COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES v. SULLIVAN ASSOCIATES
    (SC 16042)
    
      James H. Lee, in support of the motion.
    
      Raymond P. Pech and David S. Stowe, in opposition.
    Decided December 21, 1999
   The motion by the defendant Sullivan Asociates for reargument or reargument en banc of this court’s decision in Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Sullivan Associates, 250 Conn. 763, 739 A.2d 238 (1999), is denied.

MCDONALD, C. J.,

dissenting. I dissent from the vote denying reargument in this case for the reasons stated in my dissent published in Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Sullivan Associates, 250 Conn. 763, 739 A.2d 238 (1999). I wish to note that the vote on this motion making a vast change in the law of property and landlord and tenant was five to four.