Case ID: ind-app_26/html/0628-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Black, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Fenner v. Simon.
    [No. 3,765.
    Filed May 9, 1901.]
    New Trial. — Reasons.—Specifications.— That the judgment is contrary to the evidence, is not sustained by the evidence and is contrary to law, are not reasons for a new trial as recognized by §568 Burns 1894.
    From the Noble Circuit Court.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    
      T. L. Graves and L. W. Welker, fox appellant.
    
      H. C. Peterson, for appellee.
   Black, J.

The overruling of the appellant’s motion for a new tidal is alone assigned as error. In the motion for a new trial causes were stated as follows: “(1) The judgment of the court is contrary to the evidence; (2) the judgment of the court is not sustained by the evidence in this cause; (3) the judgment of the court is contrary to law.” The statute prescribing the cases in which a new trial may be granted in a civil action does not recognize as a cause fox a new trial any of the reasons stated in this motion. §568 Burns 1894, §559 Homer 1891.

Judgment affirmed.