Case ID: ohio-st-3d_90/html/0454-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      \n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Jells, Appellant.
    [Cite as State v. Jells (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 454.]
    (No. 00-1053
    Submitted October 10, 2000
    Decided December 27, 2000.)
    
      William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Reno J. Ordani, J.r., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
    
      Shawn Martin, for appellant.
   Per Curiam.

Based on the reasoning set forth in its opinion, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying appellant’s application for reopening for failing to establish a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on the part of appellate counsel. Spivey, supra, 84 Ohio St.3d at 25, 701 N.E.2d at 697. In none of the six instances has Jells raised “a genuine issue as to whether [he] was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel on appeal” before the court of appeals, as required under App.R. 26(B).

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.