Case ID: ny-super-ct_58/html/0582-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary V. Amerman, Respondent v. Bertha Deane, Appellant.
    Decided April 21, 1890.
    Motion for a re-argument.
    W. J. Townsend, for respondent. John H. Deane, for appellant.
    Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Freedman, J. The decision in respect of which the motion was made will be found in 57 N. Y. Superior Court Rep. 175. The motion was denied, the following opinion being delivered.
   Per Curiam.

The opinion written in the case did not by any expression recognize the fact that equity is said to give fuller compensation than is gained by an action at law. That did not affect the substance of the decision which intended to affirm that neither equity or law would give as damages what in reality was not damages. Motion denied with ten dollars costs.