Case ID: f-appx_235/html/0447-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose VARGAS-CISNEROS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-10612.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 9, 2007 .
    Filed July 19, 2007.
    Paul L. Pugliese, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Reno, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Charles C. Diaz, Esq., Law Offices of Charles C. Diaz, Reno, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jose Vargas-Cisneros appeals from his 135-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine and aiding and abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), 841(b)(l)(A)(viii), and 18 U.S.C. § 2.

We reject Vargas-Cisneros’s contention regarding the enforceability of the appeal waiver, and we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir.2005); see also United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084 n. 8 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.