Case ID: f-appx_710/html/0147-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Janice Wolk GRENADIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James C. CLARK, Judge, in his Personal and Professional Capacity, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 17-1807
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: January 30, 2018
    Decided: February 1, 2018
    Janice Wolk Grenadier, Appellant Pro Se. Margeaux Showell Serrano, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
    Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Janice Wolk Grenadier appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her suit against a state judge and denying various motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grenadier v. Clark, No. 1:17-cv-00280-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. Apr. 21, 2017; May 23, 2017; June 2 & 23, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts’and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED