Case ID: ny_175/html/0476-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Adolph Goldmark, Respondent, v. Magnolia Anti-Friction Metal Company, Appellant.
    
      Goldmark v. Magnolia Ante-Friction Metal Co., 71 App. Div. 617, affirmed.
    (Submitted May 5, 1903;
    decided May 19, 1903.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 15, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
    
      Alexander S. Bacon and Murphy c& Metcalf for appellant.
    
      John Frankenheimer and Constant & Coghill for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.