Case ID: nj-eq_93/html/0502-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The Swedesboro National Bank v. John C. Richman et al.
    [Decided February 9th, 1922.]
    On appeal from chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, whose opinion is reported in 92 N. J. Eq. 8f\6.
    
    
      Mr. Jomes Mercer Davis, for tire complainant.
    
      Mr. Joseph J. Swnmerill, for the defendants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed, by Vice-Chancellor Backes in the court below.

For affirmance — The Ci-iief-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzbnbach, Williams, Gardner, Ackersoií, Van Buskirk — 13.

For reversal — None.