Case ID: nj-eq_101/html/0792-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Paul Muller, receiver, &c., respondent, v. Bernard Schram et al., appellants.
    [Decided October 17th, 1927.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Church, whose opinion is reported in 100 N. J. Fq. llfi.
    
    
      Messrs. Bilder & Bilder, for the respondent.
    
      Messrs. Weinberger & Weinberger, for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Church.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.