Case ID: njl_63/html/0353-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

EDWARD A. DAY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. MAYOR, &c., OF MORRISTOWN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued March 9, 1899
    Decided June 19, 1899.
    On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Supreme Court, see 33 Vroom 571.
    For the plaintiff in error, Stephen H. Little.
    
    For the defendant in error, Edward A. Lay.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Collins, Adams, Bogert, Hendrickson, Nixon, Yre-DENBURGH. 8.

For reversal — None.