Case ID: ga_164/html/0880-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hill v. Matthews.
    No. 5679.
    October 1, 1927.
    Equitable petition. Before Judge Hardeman. Toombs superior court. August 26, 1926.
    
      L. G. Underwood and J. Wade Johnson, for plaintiff.
    
      W. M. Lewis and Saffold & Sharpe, for defendants.
   Per Curiam.

The petition in this case not plainly, distinctly, and fully setting out any case entitling the plaintiff to reformation of the deed in question, the court below did not err in sustaining a demurrer to the petition and in dismissing the same.

Reformation of Instruments, 34 Cyc. p. 971, n. 26.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Hill, J., absent.