Case ID: f_203/html/1022-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CAUSEY v. UNITED STATES.
    
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    April 12, 1913.)
    No. 2,420.
    Appeal from the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Wm. I. Grubb, Judge.
    T. M. Miller and J. L. Bradford, both of New Orleans, La., for appellant. Charlton R. Beattie, U. S. Atty., of New Orleans, La.
    Before PARDEE and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and NEWMAN, District Judge.
    
      
       Rehearing denied June 2, 1913.
    
   PER CURIAM.

A majority of the judges are of opinion that the evidence submitted in the court below on the trial of this case fully justifies the finding that the appellant, in obtaining and perfecting his homestead entry, was guilty of such fraud as warrants the decree below vacating the patent. Affirmed.