Case ID: f-appx_66/html/0501-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter Louis INGRAM, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-7691.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted June 12, 2003.
    Decided June 17, 2003.
    Walter Louis Ingram, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before LUTTIG and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    
    Affirmed by unpublished PER . CURIAM opinion.
    
      
       This case was decided by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).
    
   PER CURIAM.

Walter Louis Ingram appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Ingram, No. CA-92-116-JFM (D.Md. Sept. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.