Case ID: sw2d_955/html/0214-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER curiam:.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gary GANDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 71356.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Oct. 21, 1997.
    Dave Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jill La-Hue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.
   ORDER

PER curiam:.

Defendant, Gary Gandy, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).