Case ID: fla_151/html/0586-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, and PROPERTY OWNERS, TAXPAYERS, and CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF BROOKSVILLE, and others having or claiming any right, title or interest in property to be affected by the issue of $316,490.31 refunding bonds of City of Brooksville, v. CITY OF BROOKSVILLE in Hernando County, Florida, a body politic and corporate, THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKSVILLE, Hernando County, Florida, and S. R. COLLINS, W. P. MURPHY and J. C. BACON, as and constituting the City Commission of the City of Brooksville, Hernando County, Florida.
    10 So. (2nd) 342
    Division A-
    October 20, 1942
   PER CURIAM:

On appeal we review decree of the Circuit Court validating the refunding ■ bond issue of the City of Brooksville, Florida, to be dated July 1, 1941 in the sum of $316,490.31.

The record shows that these bonds were to refund an outstanding issue of $224,200.00 principal, and $92,290.31 interest.

Among other things, the appellant strenously argues that the obligation for past-due and unpaid interest cannot be included in the refunding bonds. This question was set at rest most recently by our opinion in the case of State of Florida v. Special Road and' Bridge District No. 3 of Palm Beach County, Fla., et al., filed October 6, 1942 and not yet reported.

Other questions stated have been considered and are found to be without merit.

The decree is affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD, and ADAMS, JJ., concur.