Case ID: so2d_582/html/1191-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Roy CASSIDAY, Lynn Drury and Hilton Development Co., Appellees.
    No. 90-314.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    March 29, 1991.
    Rehearing Denied June 18, 1991.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Edward C. Hill, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellant.
    Barry W. Beroset of Beroset & Keene, Pensacola, for appellee Roy Cassiday.
    Eliot S. Berkowitz, Pensacola, for appel-lee Lynn Drury.
    L. Charles Hilton, Jr. of Hilton, Hilton, Kolk & Penson, Panama City, for appellee Hilton Development Co.
   PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, the state challenges the dismissal of an amended information by which it sought to charge the appellees with grand theft. The appellees had sought dismissal of the information on numerous grounds, and the circuit court dismissed the information without explanation of its reasons for doing so. Because we are unable to determine the basis for the dismissal, we remand the case for entry of an order which sets forth the trial court’s grounds for dismissal.

BOOTH and MINER, JJ., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.