Case ID: blume-sup-ct-trans_5/html/0084-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WILLIAM McDONALD versus JOHN MILLER, JAMES C. EDGERLY, and WILLIAM OLDS.
   Journal Entries (1827-31): Journal 4: (1) Motion to dissolve injunction and to dismiss bill *p. 134; (2) demurrer set for argument *p. 182; (3) continued *p. 216; (4) demurrer argued, submitted *p. 292; (5) demurrer overruled *p. 308; (6) case submitted *p. 375; (7) plea deemed an answer, leave given to answer further, motion for decree pro confesso *p. 376; (8) bill taken as confessed *p. 377; (9) motion to confirm master’s report and to take bill as confessed *p. 413; (10) master’s report confirmed nisi, bill taken as confessed nisi *p. 440.; (11) rule confirming master’s report and taking bill as confessed made absolute, decree *p. 448.

Papers in File: (i) Bill of complaint, fiat for injunction; (2) recognizance for injunction; (3) transcript of J. P. record; (4) writ of injunction and return; (5) writ of subpoena and return; (6) receipt for costs of serving subpoena; (7) motion to dissolve injunction and to dismiss bill; (8) demurrer; (9) plea; (10) notice of hearing; (11) exceptions to plea, motion for reference; (12) report of master on exceptions; (13) answer; (14) draft of decree; (15) writ of ca. sa. for costs, return.

Chancery Case 83 of 1827.