Case ID: so2d_667/html/1042-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE ex rel. Nobie HARRIS v. STATE of Louisiana.
    No. 96-KH-0237.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Feb. 16, 1996.
   In re Harris, Nobie; — Plaintiff/s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial 'Writ; Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 40,368.

Writ granted in part. Where “there is a discrepancy between the minutes and the transcript, the transcript must prevail.” State v. Lynch, 441 So.2d 732, 734 (La.1983); see also State v. Godejohn, 425 So.2d 750, 751 n. (“boilerplate type minutes of court” lack reliability and must yield to transcript). The district court is therefore ordered to resen-tence relator in compliance with State v. Harris, 93-1098 (La. 1/5/96), 665 So.2d 1164. In all other respects, the application is denied.