Case ID: sw2d_948/html/0279-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jimmy PARSONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 71240.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    July 15, 1997.
    S. Paige Canfield, Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    John Munson Morris, III, Attorney General, Breck K. Burgess, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Jimmy Parsons, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 24.085 motion as untimely filed. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. The time limits of Rule 24.035 have been found valid, mandatory, and reasonable. Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo.banc 1989). As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).