Case ID: ga-app_40/html/0504-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

19994.
    CLARK v. THE STATE.
    Decided November 12, 1929.
    
      
      M. B. Huíanles, Norman Shattuclc, for plaintiff in error.
    
      M. Neil Andrews, solicitor-general, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

This case is controlled by the principle announced in Cummings v. State, 25 Ga. App. 427 (103 S. E. 687), and the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial. See Turner v. State, 25 Ga. App. 234 (102 S. E. 847); Kennedy v. State, 23 Ga. App. 141 (97 S. E. 894); Reeves v. State, 23 Ga. App. 9 (97 S. E. 263).

As a new trial must follow the foregoing ruling, it is unnecessary to pass upon the allegéd errors referred to in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles; C. J., and Luhe, J., concur.