Case ID: sw2d_962/html/0411-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 71831.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Jan. 27, 1998.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 18, 1998.
    David C. Hemingway, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Angel Woodruff, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Charles Lee ( “movant”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after his plea of guilty to third offense stealing, RSMo section 570.040 (1994).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find that the judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision is attached solely for the use of the parties involved.