Case ID: conn-app_17/html/0801-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

State of Connecticut v. Reliable Refuse, Inc., et al.
    (6366)
    Dupont, C. J., Spallone and Foti, Js.
    Argued October 4
    decision released October 26, 1988
    
      Albert G. Murphy, for the appellant (named defendant).
    
      Eugene A. Cooney, for the appellee (plaintiff).
   Per Curiam.

The named defendant is appealing from the judgment rendered for the plaintiff on the defendants’ counterclaim following a directed verdict.

The defendants did not move to set aside the directed verdict, thereby limiting this court to a plain error standard of review. Practice Book § 4185; Pietrorazio v. Santopietro, 185 Conn. 510, 515, 441 A.2d 163 (1981); Denby v. Voloshin Cadillac, 3 Conn. App. 181, 183, 485 A.2d 1360, cert. dismissed, 196 Conn. 802, 491 A.2d 1105 (1985); Eagar v. Barron, 2 Conn. App. 468, 472, 480 A.2d 567 (1984).

An examination of the record fails to disclose plain error.

There is no error.