Case ID: conn_154/html/0729-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert Hartling et al. v. George Sawicksky et al.
    
      Hyman Wilensky, for the appellants (named plaintiff et al.), and David A Beiser, assistant attorney general, for the appellant (state as intervening plaintiff).
    Argued November 1
    decided November 1, 1966
   It appearing that the plaintiffs in the above-entitled case have failed to prosecute their appeal from the Superior Court in New London County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.