Case ID: sw3d_142/html/0779-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas FREY, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Joyce GOLDRING, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. ED 82542.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    June 15, 2004.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 10, 2004.
    Application for Transfer Denied Sept. 28, 2004.
    
      Michael Foss Merritt, Creve Coeur, MO, for appellant.
    Jeana D. McFerron, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, C.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Frey (Frey) appeals from a trial court judgment notwithstanding the verdict on his breach of contract claim against Joyce Goldring. Frey argues that the trial court erred in concluding that the alleged contract was invalid because it was missing an essential term, namely a fixed price or a method to ascertain the price. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that because Frey did not make a submissible case for breach of contract, the trial court did not err in entering a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Pikey v. Gen. Accident Ins. Co. of Am., 922 S.W.2d 777, 780 (Mo.App. E.D.1996). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).