Case ID: sw2d_467/html/0408-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Tom KRITSER, Petitioner, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF AMARILLO et al., Respondent.
    No. B-2619.
    Supreme Court of Texas.
    May 12, 1971.
    Rehearing Denied June 9, 1971.
    Hugh L. Umphres, Jr., Amarillo, for petitioner.
    Nelson, McClesky & Harriger, Clarence P. Brazill, Jr., Lubbock, Jim Fullingim, Amarillo, Thompson, Knight, Simmons & Bullion, Harry M. Roberts, Jr., Dallas, Joseph H. Pool, Folley, Snodgrass & Calhoun, Roy Snodgrass, Amarillo, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error, but we do not regard the judgment as making any determination of interest in the land or construction of the deed in the event Anna Belle Kritser should die with grandchildren surviving her but without any child of her own surviving. We do not intend to approve or disapprove the following language in the court of civil appeals opinion: “(3) If all of Anna Belle Kritser’s children and their descendants per stirpes predeceased her, Anna Belle Kritser’s sisters would take the remainder interest.” 463 S.W.2d 751, 757.