Case ID: so2d_555/html/0939-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Peter LUCHINA, Appellant, v. The Honorable Howard C. BERMAN, in his capacity as Judge of the County Court, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, Appellee.
    No. 88-2258.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Jan. 17, 1990.
    Michael P. Smodish and Michael Dubiner of Dubiner & Blumberg, P.A., Boynton Beach, for appellant.
    David H. Bludworth, State Atty., and Robert S. Jaegers and Mark T. Eissey, Asst. State Attys., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. We agree with appellant that the county court record reflects that the state failed to . establish sufficient grounds to extend the time within which appellant was entitled to be brought to trial under Rule 3.191(d)(2), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (1987). See R.L.K. v. Hastings, 370 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Watts v. State, 516 So.2d 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

ANSTEAD, WALDEN and POLEN, JJ., concur.