Case ID: f-appx_110/html/0736-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles BAUSLEY, Appellant, v. Kevin DUGAN; Joe Spencer, Appellees.
    No. 04-2642.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 1, 2004.
    Decided Oct. 13, 2004.
    Charles Bausley, Little Rock, AR, pro se.
    Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Charles Bausley appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action claiming defendant jail personnel violated his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by searching his cell and seizing some of his possessions. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons the district court stated. See Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 525-36, 104 S.Ct. 3194, 82 L.Ed.2d 393 (1984) (Fourth Amendment has no applicability to prison cells; no due process violation in unauthorized deprivation of prisoner’s property if adequate state postdeprivation remedy exists); McQuillan v. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp., 331 Ark. 242, 961 S.W.2d 729, 732 (1998) (state-law action for conversion is remedy for wrongful possession or disposition of another’s property). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beverly Stites Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.