Case ID: so2d_427/html/0186-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Arthur G. BRODSKY, Respondent.
    No. 62913.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Feb. 3, 1983.
    Original Proceeding — The Florida Bar.
    John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, Stanley A. Spring, Staff Counsel and Jack Weiss, Discipline Counsel, Tallahassee, and Richard B. Liss, Bar Counsel and Robert D. Rosenbloom, Asst. Staff Counsel, Miami, for complainant.
    Arthur G. Brodsky, in pro. per.
   PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the Court on Petition for Approval of Conditional Guilty Plea for Consent Judgment and Entry of Final Order of Discipline to violations of Disciplinary Rule 6-101(A)(3) of the Code of Professional Responsibility of The Florida Bar. We approve the Petition and we hereby reprimand Respondent, Arthur G. Brodsky, for these violations. The publication of this order in Southern Reporter shall serve as Respondent’s public reprimand.

Costs in the amount of $385.33 are hereby taxed against the Respondent.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, A.C.J., and BOYD, OVERTON, MCDONALD and EHRLICH, JJ., concur.