Case ID: f2d_86/html/0259-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re DODGE. CIERI v. DODGE.
    No. 92.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    Nov. 16, 1936.
    Hobart L. Morris, of Utica, N. Y., for appellant.
    David J. Goldstein, of Utica, N. Y., for appellee.
    Before L. HAND, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

For tlie reasons stated at the argument this order must be affirmed. The case did not raise the question of the effect of the discharge upon the appellant’s judgment and the district court should not have discussed it. It is impossible to reverse an opinion, but we take this occasion to declare that it was extrajudicial, and that it should not be regarded as authoritative for any purpose whatever.

Order affirmed.