Case ID: so2d_151/html/0002-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. DREW, Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lillian SADOWSKY and Sidney Sadowsky, Petitioners, v. Benjamin LEVINE and Anna Levine, Respondents.
    No. 31757.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Feb. 13, 1963.
    Rehearing Denied April 2, 1963.
    Green & Hastings and Carr & Warren, Miami, for petitioners.
    Welsh, Cornell, Pyszka & Carlton, Miami, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the petition is without merit. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged, 135 So.2d 776.

It is so ordered.

TERRELL, Acting C. J., THOMAS, CALDWELL, HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and SMITH, Circuit Judge, concur.

DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., dissent.

DREW, Justice

(dissenting).

I would grant certiorari and quash the decision of the district court for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Judge PEARSON, TILLMAN.

O’CONNELL, J., concurs.