Case ID: f-appx_584/html/0416-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ESTATE OF John James RYAN, Plaintiff, and Mykal S. Ryan, Special Administrator for Estate of John James Ryan, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Timothy M. HYDEN, a California resident and as Trustee of the John and Christy Ryan Family Trust; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 13-55041.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 22, 2014.
    
    Filed July 31, 2014.
    Mykal S. Ryan, San Diego, CA, pro se.
    
      Before: GOODWIN, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. 
        See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Mykal S. Ryan, Special Administrator for the Estate of John James Ryan, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due process and equal protection violations in connection with the enforcement of a default judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to comply with a pre-filing order. In re Fillbach, 223 F.3d 1089, 1090 (9th Cir.2000). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing this action because Ryan failed to comply with the vexatious litigant order entered against him, which required him to obtain court approval before filing an action involving these defendants and issues. See id.

We reject Ryan’s contentions of alleged judicial bias and prejudice.

We deny Ryan’s outstanding requests.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.