Case ID: pa_572/html/0274-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

815 A.2d 557
    In the Matter of Eugene A. STEGER, Jr.
    No. 482 Disciplinary Docket No. 2.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Dec. 12, 2002.
   PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 12th day of December, 2002, a Rule having been issued upon Eugene A. Steger, Jr., to show cause why an order denying reinstatement should not be entered, upon consideration of the responses filed, the Rule is discharged, the Petition for Reinstatement is hereby granted and petitioner’s request for oral argument is dismissed as moot.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Disciplinary Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.