Case ID: njl_107/html/0192-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ALBINO SCILIMBRACCA, RESPONDENT, v. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT.
    Submitted February 14, 1930
    Decided October 20, 1930.
    For the respondent, Arthur De Vincentis.
    
    For the appellant, William A. Barkalow.
    
   Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chiee Justice, Campbell, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Deae, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Bays, Heteield, Wells, JJ. 3.