Case ID: f-appx_697/html/0233-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gerald D. FULLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden Frank B. BISHOP, Jr.; F.S.C. II Larry D. Hanlin; Supervisor; Keefe Commissary Network Sales, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 17-6423
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: August 30, 2017
    Decided: September 22, 2017
    Gerald D. Fuller, Appellant Pro Se. An-kush Nayar, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Davis Fuller appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to defendants in his action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fuller v. Bishop, No. 1:15-cv-02524-WMN, 2017 WL 386536 (D. Md. Jan. 27 & Mar. 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED