Case ID: so2d_634/html/0321-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

R.H., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 93-3584.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    April 7, 1994.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Thomas FalMnburg and Amelia L. Beisner, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from an order of the trial court requiring appellant’s employer to deduct $31 per month from appellant’s pay to satisfy a prior order of restitution. We must reverse because there is no statutory or rule authority permitting the trial court to impose income deduction as part of restitution in juvenile cases. See § 39.058, Fla.Stat. (1991); § 39.054, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1992); contrast § 775.089(12)(a)1, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1992).

BOOTH, ALLEN, and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.