Case ID: so2d_958/html/0513-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DIEUTAMY EXILUS ACQUISSA, Appellant, v. Venila JOHNSON, Appellee.
    No. 3D06-2924.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 30, 2007.
    Catherine L. Roselli, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    Francis R. Gil, Miami, for appellee.
    Before GREEN, RAMIREZ, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Broadfoot v. Broadfoot, 791 So.2d 584, 585 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(affirming where there was no indication that the need for statutory findings was called to the attention of the trial court); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (stating that without a transcript, the record is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error).