Case ID: f-appx_499/html/0633-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Chadwick Wayne ACISON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 12-2506.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 4, 2013.
    Filed: March 6, 2013.
    Troy K. Stabenow, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Jefferson City, MO (Raymond C. Conrad, Jr., Fed. Public Defender, Kansas City, MO, on the brief), for appellant.
    Jim Y. Lynn, Asst. U.S. Atty., Jefferson City, MO, for appellee.
    Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

After Chadwick Acison stipulated to having violated his release conditions, the district court revoked his supervised release and imposed a sentence of 30 months in prison with no supervised release to follow. Acison appeals, arguing that the court imposed an unreasonable sentence. We disagree. The record shows that the district court properly considered the relevant sentencing factors before imposing a revocation sentence that was authorized by statute and within the applicable Guidelines range. See 18 U.S.C. § 3588(e)(3); United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir.2009) (applying presumption of substantive reasonableness to revocation sentence within Guidelines range); United States v. White Face, 383 F.3d 733, 740 (8th Cir.2004) (court need not list every 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factor when sentencing defendant upon revocation of supervised release).

The judgment is affirmed. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. 
      
      . The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.