Case ID: nys_34/html/1147-11.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "GILDERSLEEVE, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SCHUTT, Respondent, v. MANHATTAN RY. CO. et al., Appellants.
    (Superior Court of New York City, General Term.
    June, 1895.)
    Action by Peter S. Schutt against the Manhattan Railway Company and another.
    Davies, Short & Townsend (Julien T. Davies and A. T. Stoutenburgh. of counsel), for appellants.
    R. W. G. Welling (E. A. Hibbard, of counsel), for-respondent.
   GILDERSLEEVE, J.

This is the ordinary equity action to restrain the operation of the elevated railroad of the defendants in front of the plaintiff’s premises, and to procure an assessment of rental damages sustained by the plaintiff, as incidental to the main relief. The premises in question are situated on the west side> of Greenwich street, between Vestry and Desbrosses streets, and are 41 feet 8 inches on Greenwich street, by 80 feet in depth. The property consists of two adjoining brick buildings, and two actions were originally brought, but, prior to the trial, were duly consolidated into one action. The trial court fixed the sum to be paid by the defendants to avoid an injunction at $4,000, and awarded the sum of $2,-543 for rental damages. The learned trial judge seems to have been guided by, and applied, correct rules of law in disposing of the issues raised, and of the motions presented for his consideration. The award for rental damages and the assessment fixed as a condition of avoiding the injunction are fully justified by the attorney. We can find no reason for disturbing the judgment. It should be affirmed, with costs to the respondent.