Case ID: pa_353/html/0308-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ockman v. Jones Machine Tool Works, Inc., Appellant.
    Argued January 9, 1946.
    Before Maxey, C. J., Deew, Linn, Steen, Patteeson, Steaene and Jones, JJ.
    reargument refused January 23, 1946.
    
      Charles 8. Thompson and Wade Coble, for appellant.
    
      Edward Unterberger, for appellee.
    January 10, 1946:
   Pee Cueiam,

This appeal raises no substantial question that was not disposed of on the prior appeal: Ockman v. Jones Machine Tool Works, 349 Pa. 527, 37 A. 2d 538. The settled rule is that summary judgment on pleadings may not be entered unless the right is clear. As the court below pointed out in its opinion, issues of fact are raised in this case which should be determined by trial.

Judgment affirmed.