Case ID: ohio-st_128/html/0049-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hummell v. Mercier. (Two Cases.)
    (Nos. 24456 and 24457
    — Decided March 14, 1934.)
    
      Messrs. King, Flynn & Frohman, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Messrs. Krueger, Bosino & Moore, for defendants in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and. the same is hereby, affirmed on authority of Wyant v. Russell, 109 Ohio St., 167, for the reason that the record discloses that the Municipal Court of Sandusky rendered judgment as of May 25, 1932, which judgment was entered on the civil docket of that court as required by law and was not vacated, and the limitation for perfecting appeal ran from the judgment of May 25, 1932.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.