Case ID: a3d_173-2/html/0184-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

EQR-LPC URBAN RENEWAL NORTH PIER, LLC and EQR-Lincoln Urban Renewal Jersey City, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, Defendant-Respondent.
    A-16 Sept. Term 2016 078268
    Supreme Court of New Jersey.
    Argued October 11, 2017 Decided November 15, 2017
    Craig M. White (Baker & Hostetler of the Illinois bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellant (Baker & Hostetler and K & L Gates, attorneys; Craig M. White, Anthony P. La Rocco and Benjamin I. Rubinstein, on the brief).
    Jeremy A. Farrell and Philip S. Adelman argued the cause for respondent (Jeremy A. Farrell, Corporation Counsel, City of New Jersey, attorney; Mary Ann Murphy, Assistant Corporation counsel, on the brief).
   PER CURIAM

The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the PER CURIAM opinion, reported at 452 N.J. Super. 309, 173 A. 3d 243 (App. Div. 2016).

CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER and JUSTICES LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ-VINA, and SOLOMON join in this opinion. JUSTICE TIMPONE did not participate.