Case ID: ohio-st-3d_71/html/0628-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McDonald.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. McDonald (1995), 71 Ohio St.3d 628.]
    (No. 94-2303
    Submitted January 10, 1995
    Decided March 29, 1995.)
    
      
      Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Alvin E. Mathews, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
   Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record in this case and agree that respondent violated DR 1 — 102(A)(4), (5), and (6), 3 — 101(B), and 9 — 102(B)(1). However, we cannot concur in the recommendation to impose further disciplinary measures where previous sanctions have been ignored with relative impunity. Therefore, we order that respondent be permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.