Case ID: sw3d_16/html/0722-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Vernon STROUD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 76453.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    April 18, 2000.
    Mary S. Choi, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Linda Lemke, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, J., and SULLIVAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vernon Stroud (“Defendant”) appeals from a judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. Defendant claims ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). 
      
      . All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2000, unless otherwise indicated.