Case ID: f3d_317/html/0938-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard PECAROVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 00-55400.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 7, 2001.
    
    Filed Oct. 31, 2002.
    Amended Jan. 28, 2003.
    Robert S. Gerstein, Santa Monica, California; Paul S. Sigelman, Beverly Hills, California, for the plaintiff-appellant.
    Peter H. Klee, Seth M. Friedman, Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, San Diego, California, for the defendant-appellee.
    Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for submission without oral argument pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   ORDER

Judge Browning votes to deny the Petition for Panel Rehearing and recommends denying the Petition for Rehearing En Banc. Judge Reinhardt votes to deny the Petition for Panel Rehearing and the Petition for Rehearing En Banc. Judge Tail-man votes to grant the Petition for Panel Rehearing and the Petition for Rehearing En Banc.

The Petition for Panel Rehearing and the Petition for Rehearing En Banc are DENIED. Allstate’s Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED.

The opinion filed October 31, 2002 is amended. The amendment to the opinion is as follows:

Add the following footnote to the end of the first sentence of the last paragraph on page 13:

11 In its Petition for Rehearing, Allstate argues for the first time that it is precluded from waiving the proof of loss requirement by a guideline in the FEMA Flood Insurance Manual allowing waivers only for claims under $7,500. We do not decide this issue here.

IT IS SO ORDERED.