Case ID: so2d_617/html/0454-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jose Danilo CRUZ and Richard Manuel Milian, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-934.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 4, 1993.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Harvey J. Sepler, Asst. Public Defender, for appellants.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Stephanie G. Kolman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and LEVY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We vacate defendants’ sentences because the court imposed sentences in excess of the statutory maximum for second degree misdemeanors. Shaktman v. State, 529 So.2d 711, 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), approved, 553 So.2d 148 (Fla.1989); § 775.-082(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1989).

Defendants’ remaining point lacks merit. William v. State, 591 So.2d 664 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Flanagan v. State, 536 So.2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Convictions affirmed; sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing.