Case ID: ny-sup-ct_10/html/0625-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

REUBEN H. MAPLESDEN, Respondent, v. G. TEN EYCK, SHELDON AND ANOTHER, APPELLANTS.
    Appeal from a judgment, entered on the report of a referee. The action was brought to foreclose a mortgage, and the principal question involved was, as to whether the time for its payment had been extended. The referee found, as a fact, that the plaintiff never agreed to extend the time. The evidence was conflicting upon this point, and the General Term affirmed the judgment.
    
      H. Brewster, for the appellants.
    
      George A. Brwndreth, for the respondent.
   Opinion by Barnard, P. J.

Present — Barnard, P. J., Tappen and Donohue, JJ.

. Judgment affirmed, with costs.