Case ID: ad_159/html/0883-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hugh J. Reilly, Appellant, v. Jose Antonio Frias and Latin American Contracting and Improvement Company, Respondents.
    
      Injunction.
    
    Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 17th day of September, 1913, granting an injunction pendente lite.
    
   Per Curiam:

This court cannot undertake to decide the disputed questions of fact upon the hopelessly contradictory affidavits contained in this record. As those are the very matters put in issue by the complaint, counterclaim and reply, an injunction pendente lite preserving the status quo seems authorized. We think, however, that the bond required of the defendant Latin American Contracting and Improvement Company should be increased to $5,000, and that the plaintiff should have leave to renew the .motion to vacate the injunction if the defendants interpose unreasonable delay to the trial of the action. The order appealed from should be modified accordingly, and as so modified affirmed, without costs in this court to either party. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order modified as indicated in opinion and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.