Case ID: sw3d_203/html/0241-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Wally SCOTT, Appellant.
    No. ED 86846.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Oct. 10, 2006.
    Rosalynn Koch, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Victor J. Melenbrink, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J. and GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Wally Scott (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for first-degree child molestation, Section 566.067, RSMo 2000, for which Defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment. On appeal, Defendant argues the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of Dr. Charles Brainerd regarding the techniques used to interview D.S. (Victim). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).