Case ID: pa-super_244/html/0583-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: WATKINS, P. J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

371 A.2d 863
    Commonwealth v. Rohde, Appellant.
    Submitted March 8, 1976.
    Neil E. Jokelson and Mitchell S. Lipschutz, for appellant; Oscar F. Spicer, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
   OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The case is remanded for a hearing under the Post Conviction Hearing Act. See Commonwealth v. Doria, 468 Pa. 534, 364 A.2d 322 (1976).

PRICE and VAN der VOORT, JJ., dissent.

WATKINS, P. J.,

dissents on the basis of this Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Doria, 232 Pa.Superior Ct. 439, 335 A.2d 472 (1975).