Case ID: ohio-st-2d_45/html/0236-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Noble, Appellant, v. McMaken, Appellee.
    [Cite as Noble v. McMaken (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 236.]
    (No. 75-1041
    Decided March 10, 1976.)
    
      
      Mr. Augustus L. Ross III, for appellant.
    
      Mr. Robert J. Huffman, prosecuting attorney,- for appellee. ' ’
   Per Curiam.

In Freeman v. Maxwell (1965), 4 Ohio St. 2d 4, this court held' “that-the availability of the post-conviction remedies provided by Sections 2953.21 to>2953.24, inclusive, Revised Code, is ground for denial of” a writ of habeas corpus.

Accordingly, on authority of Freeman v. Maxwell, supra, and for the reasons stated therein, the judgment of the Court of Appeals, dismissing appellant’s complaint for a writ of habeas corpus, is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze:, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.