Case ID: ad2d_140/html/0423-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael Porcelli, Appellant, v Joseph Zapparo, Respondent.
   We find that the Supreme Court erred in granting the defendant summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The hospital record X-ray report bearing the defendant’s stamped signature constituted admissible documentary evidence (CPLR 4518 [b]) sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant was involved in the alleged erroneous interpretation of the X ray. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.