Case ID: so2d_555/html/0195-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "McMILLAN, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jay Cee VAN SCOY v. STATE.
    8 Div. 740.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    March 8, 1988.
    Rehearing Denied May 24, 1988.
    Bryce U. Graham, Tuscumbia, for appellant.
    Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and Cecil G. Brendle, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
   ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING AND RULE 39(k) MOTION

McMILLAN, Judge.

In accordance with the Alabama Supreme Court decision in Ex parte Branch, 526 So.2d 609, modified on rehearing [Ms. 86-500, Dec. 4, 1987] (Ala.1987), this cause is remanded to the trial court to conduct proceedings consistent with the guidelines adopted in the Branch opinion. The trial court is instructed to file findings of facts and conclusions with this Court within a reasonable time after the entry of this remand.

APPLICATION GRANTED; ORIGINAL DECISION OF AFFIRMANCE SET ASIDE; REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.