Case ID: ad_130/html/0903-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles Parkinson, Respondent, v. George H. Munroe and Alexander Munroe, Composing the Firm of Munroe & Munroe, and Others, Impleaded with Lord’s Court Building and The Empire State Surety Company, Appellants.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Ingraham, J., dissented on the ground that the evidence is not sufficient to show a consent by the appellant within the Lien Law. 
      
      See Laws of 1897, chap. 418, § 3.— [Rep.