Case ID: so2d_623/html/1190-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Kim HIGGINS, Respondent.
    No. 81262.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Sept. 16, 1993.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and James W. Rogers, Bureau Chief and Amelia L. Beisner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for petitioner.
    John C. Harrison of John C. Harrison, P.A., Shalimar, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We review Higgins v. State, 611 So.2d 604 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), based on a certified question. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We answered the question in State v. Rucker, 613 So.2d 460 (Fla.1993). We quash the decision under review and remand the case for proceedings consistent with our opinion in Rucker.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.