Case ID: pa_582/html/0101-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

870 A.2d 318
    COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner, v. Adam EIDINGER, Respondent.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    March 2, 2005.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of March, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED, inasmuch as it affirms respondent’s judgment of sentence. In all other aspects, the Order of the Superior Court is REVERSED. See Reilly by Reilly v. SEPTA, 507 Pa. 204, 489 A.2d 1291 (1985). Jurisdiction relinquished.