Case ID: ny-st-rep_46/html/0962-08.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pratt, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rosalie A. Bleakley, Resp’t, v. Timothy J. Sullivan, Impl’d, App’lt.
    Motion for re-argument. See 42 St. Rep., 814.
    
      C. W. Horton (Calvin Frost and Franklin Couch, of counsel), for motion; D. W. Travis, opposed.
   Pratt, J.

The moving affidavits do not point out any statute-or controlling decision that has been overlooked.

We are still of the opinion that the judgment was properly affirmed.

Motion for re-argument denied; motion to be allowed to appeal to the court or" appeals denied. No costs of motion.

Barnard, P J., and Dykman, J., concur.