Case ID: so2d_191/html/0049-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

D. B. BELL, Jr., Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 35010.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Oct. 19, 1966.
    For opinion of District Court of Appeal see 179 So.2d 377.
    
      Robert L. Koeppel and Phillip A. Hub-bart, Miami, for petitioner.
    Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the jurisdictional conflict does not appear. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.