Case ID: ohio-st-3d_51/html/0036-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams (1990), 51 Ohio St. 3d 36.]
    (No. 89-2171
    Submitted February 13, 1990
    Decided May 9, 1990.)
    
      
      J. Warren Bettis, disciplinary counsel, and Mark H. Aultman, for relator.
    
      Charles W. Kettlewell, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the-board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 5-103(A), 5-107(A)(l), and 1-102(A)(5). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.