Case ID: f-appx_164/html/0640-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Anthony AALUND, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 05-30111.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 25, 2006.
    
    Decided Jan. 27, 2006.
    Earl Allan Hicks, Esq., Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Lana C. Glenn, Esq., Law Office of Lana C.C. Glenn, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: RAWLINSON and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, District Judge.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
    
      
       The Honorable Lariy A. Bums, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

We have jurisdiction to review the district court’s consideration of Aalund’s prior convictions for purposes of determining his criminal history category under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. See United States v. Dominguez, 316 F.3d 1054, 1056 (9th Cir.2003).

The district court did not err in considering Aalund’s prior convictions in its criminal history calculation, because those convictions have not been reversed or expunged. See United States v. Guthrie, 931 F.2d 564, 571-573 (9th Cir.1991); see also United States v. Young, 988 F.2d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir.1998).

SENTENCE AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.