Case ID: sw2d_894/html/0254-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas WILLIAMS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. 66658.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    March 7, 1995.
    Nancy L. Vincent, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and CRAHAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the motion court’s dismissal, for untimeliness, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The motion court’s conclusion is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).