Case ID: njl_96/html/0293-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Fee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ANTHONY KOWALSKI, RESPONDENT, v. WALKER D. HINES, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILROADS, APPELLANT.
    Submitted March 21, 1921
    Decided June 20, 1921.
    On appeal hom the Supreme Court, whose opinion is re ported in 93 K. J. L. 340.
    For the respondent, Isaac V. Goldenhorn.
    
    Fot the appellant, Wall. Haight, Carey & Haripmc.e.
    
   Fee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kaliscli in the Mupreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Cujee Justice, Hwayze, Trench aed, Parker, Minturn. Kaxzhnbacti, HeppenniiTirer, Wirliams, Gardner, JJ. 10.

For ¡eveisal—"White, J. 1.