Case ID: ad2d_269/html/0263-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Lily’s Food Corp., Petitioner, v New York State Liquor Authority, Respondent.
    [703 NYS2d 39]
   —Determination of respondent New York State Liquor Authority dated on or about March 5, 1999, revoking petitioner’s license and forfeiting its license bond in the sum of $1,000, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding, brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [William Wetzel, J.], entered May 5, 1999) dismissed, without costs.

Respondent authority’s finding that petitioner had ceased to operate its premises within the contemplation of its off-premises beer license was supported by substantial evidence, including testimony as to the quantity of beer on display in the store, and invoices of a wholesale beer distributor reflecting delivery of 243 cases of beer to petitioner in a one-month period, the value of which, at 50 cents a beer, exceeded 25 percent of the value of the total store inventory, the ceiling placed by respondent upon petitioner’s beer inventory as a condition of issuing petitioner’s off-premises beer license (see, Matter of Stork Rest, v Boland, 282 NY 256). Respondent, in promulgating the inventory requirement, did not exceed its powers since such requirement was neither irrational nor unreasonable (see, Matter of Best v New York State Liq. Auth., 59 NY2d 906, revg 89 AD2d 893 for reasons stated in dissenting mem of Lazer, J., at 893-894). Finally, the penalty imposed was not so disproportionate to the offense committed as to be “ ‘ “shocking to one’s sense of fairness” ’ ” (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 233). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.