Case ID: so2d_599/html/0111-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Manuel PARRADO, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 78436.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    April 9, 1992.
    Lee Weissenborn, Miami, for petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Katherine B. Johnson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Parrado v. State, 582 So.2d 146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), which certified the same question of great public importance presented in Smith v. State, 598 So.2d 1063 (Fla.1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. In light of Smith, the opinion under review is approved.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, barkett, grimes, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.