Case ID: so3d_105/html/0591-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Tania CORDOVES, Appellant, v. Lazaro CORDOVES, Appellee.
    No. 3D11-2492.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 26, 2012.
    Scott Jay Feder, P.A., and Scott Jay Feder, for appellant.
    Harvey D. Rogers, P.A., and Harvey D. Rogers and Nory Diaz, for appellee.
    Before CORTIÑAS, FERNANDEZ and LOGUE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979)(“When there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court cannot properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”); see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.200(b)(4) (2012) (providing a method for preparing a statement of the evidence and proceedings when a transcript is unavailable).