Case ID: ohio-st-3d_85/html/0165-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n     Lundberg Stratton, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mayfield City School District Board of Education, Appellant; Aintree Park Apartments, Appellee, v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as Mayfield City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 165.]
    (No. 98-451
    Submitted February 24, 1999
    Decided March 31, 1999.)
    
      Kelley, McCann & Livingstone, L.L.P., Fred J. Livingstone and Robert A. Brindza, for appellant.
    
      
      Fred, Siegel Co., L.P.A., and Annrita S. Johnson, for appellee Aintree Park Apartments.
    
      William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Timothy J. Kollin, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee Cuyahoga County Board of Revision et al.
   Per Curiam.

We affirm this decision on the authority of Worthington City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 156, 707 N.E.2d 499, decided today.

Decision affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I dissent for the same reasons expressed in my dissent in Worthington City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 156, 161-165, 707 N.E.2d 499, 503-505, decided today.

Cook, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.