Case ID: so3d_230/html/0413-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David GAL, Petitioner, v. PREPARED INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
    No. SC16-2190
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [November 16, 2017]
    Arnold R. Ginsberg of Arnold R. Ginsberg, P.A., Miami, Florida; and Justin P. Cernitz of Cernitz & Shanbron, P.A., Miami, Florida, for Petitioner
    Elizabeth K, Russo of Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., Miami, Florida; and Maria Medina of Diaz Briscoe Medina, P.A., Miami, Florida, for Respondent
    Kansas R. Gooden of Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Jacksonville, Florida; and Elaine D. Walter of Gaebe, Mullen, Antonelli & DiMatteo, Coral Gables, Florida, for Amicus Curiae Florida Defense Lawyers Association
   PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Prepared Ins. Co. v. Gal, 209 So.3d 14 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016), on grounds of express and direct conflict with Trinidad v. Fla. Peninsula Ins. Co., 121 So.3d 433 (Fla. 2013), and also with Colon v. Lara, 389 So.2d 1070 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Having considered the Fourth District’s opinion and the briefs of the parties, upon further review, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

CANADY, J., concurs in result.

LEWIS, J., dissents.