Case ID: ad2d_19/html/0866-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lourdes Ramirez et al., Respondents, v. Federico Mezquita et al., Appellants.
   Judgment, entered March 15, 1963, insofar as it is against defendant Raymond Bigham, unanimously reversed on the law and the facts, with costs to said defendant-appellant, and the complaint dismissed. Judgment, insofar as it is in favor of plaintiff Agripina Ramirez, against the defendants, other than Bigham, unanimously affirmed, with costs to said plaintiff-respondent. Judgment insofar as it is in favor of plaintiffs Lourdes Ramirez and Anthony Carrion, unanimously reversed on the law and the facts, and as to said plaintiffs, the action is severed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless said plaintiffs, within 10 days after the service of a copy of the order to be entered hereon, with notice of entry, shall stipulate: (a) to reduce to $10,000 the amount of the verdict in favor of plaintiff Lourdes Ramirez; and (b) to reduce to $500 the amount of the verdict in favor of plaintiff Anthony Carrion, in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is affirmed, without costs. The record fails to demonstrate a prima facie case of negligence in the operation of the Bigham vehicle which was the proximate cause of the three-car collision. Furthermore, in our opinion, the amounts of the verdict as rendered in favor of plaintiffs, Lourdes Ramirez and Anthony Carrion, were clearly excessive. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.