Case ID: so2d_350/html/0498-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael E. PITTARO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 75-1959.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Sept. 20, 1977.
    Rehearing Denied Oct. 25, 1977.
    
      Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Craig S. Barnard, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Marsha G. Madorsky, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the briefs and record on appeal we are of the opinion that the final judgment should be affirmed except that portion which directs defendant-appellant to make restitution “in the amount of $500.00” which the record does not support. At most, the record supports $253.48 as the amount appropriated from the defendant’s employer.

Accordingly, the final judgment containing special condition of probation is modified to the extent that restitution shall be in the amount of $253.48.

AFFIRMED, AS MODIFIED.

DAUKSCH, ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.