Case ID: so2d_764/html/0612-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Versie Lee THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 98-3579.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Sept. 29, 1999.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Ellen Griffin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Barbara A. Zappi, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauder-dale, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Rollinson v. State, 748 So.2d 585 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Young v. State, 719 So.2d 1010 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 727 So.2d 915 (Fla.1999); State v. Vixamar, 687 So.2d 300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (holding no constitutional right to enforce plea bargain); Winokur v. State, 605 So.2d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (holding that a defendant is not constitutionally entitled to a plea bargain); Jesus v. State, 565 So.2d 1361, 1365 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (“[I]f sentence is within the limits prescribed by the Legislature, we have no jurisdiction to interfere.”) (quoting Banks v. State, 342 So.2d 469, 470 (Fla.1976)).

GUNTHER, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.