Case ID: f-appx_432/html/0262-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gil W. JONES, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. State of MARYLAND STATE’S ATTORNEY OFFICE, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 11-1274.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 26, 2011.
    Decided: May 31, 2011.
    Gil W. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gil W. Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Md. State’s Attorney Office, No. 1:10-cv-03427-BEL (D.Md. Mar. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.