Case ID: so2d_742/html/0488-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Douglas H. POPPELL and John H. Poppell, Appellants, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND and State of Florida, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Appellees.
    No. 99-172.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Sept. 28, 1999.
    Charles R. Gardner and Bruce I. Wiener of Gardner, Shelter, Duggar, Bist & Wiener, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellants.
    Andrew J. Baumann, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee, for Appellee Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund.
    William N. Graham, Senior Attorney, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Tallahassee, for Appellee Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
   PER CURIAM.

Douglas Poppell and John Poppell seek reversal of the final order dismissing their complaint which sought injunctive relief and damages for inverse condemnation. In dismissing the complaint with prejudice, the trial court ruled that the complaint failed to state a cause of action for inverse condemnation and that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm the ruling that the inverse condemnation claim is barred by the statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4), Fla. Stat. (1969); Sarasota Welfare Home, Inc. v. City of Sarasota, 666 So.2d 171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Appellants have made no argument on appeal as to the denial of in-junctive relief. Accordingly, the order under review is AFFIRMED.

JOANOS, LAWRENCE AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.