Case ID: nj-eq_104/html/0494-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The City National Bank of Hackensack, New Jersey, respondent, v. Antonetta Di Napoli, appellant.
    [Decided May 20th, 1929.]
    
      Messrs. Hart & Venderwart, for the respondent.
    
      Messrs. Wright, Vander Burgh & McCarty, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in 101 N. J. Eq. 392.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekeb, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.