Case ID: ala-app_23/html/0619-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "RICE, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(120 So. 924)
    Marcus DANIEL v. STATE.
    (8 Div. 716.)
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    Feb. 26, 1929.
    G. O. Chenault, of Decatur, for appellant.
    Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.
   RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of burglary. The court has read the entire evidence, sitting en banc. We are of the opinion that it fails, by any legal tendency, to connect the appellant with the commission of the offense charged. For that reason, the general affirmative charge in his favor, duly requested, should have been given to the jury, and, for the error in its refusal, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.