Case ID: f-appx_475/html/0851-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES ex rel. Alex ABOU-HUSSEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; Sentek Consulting, Defendants-Appellees, and Eagan Mcallister Associates, Incorporated; Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command, Defendants.
    No. 12-1701.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 21, 2012.
    Decided: Aug. 23, 2012.
    Alex Abou-Hussein, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Kinney Helvin, Michael L. Waldman, Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Unter-einer & Sauber, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Gary K. Brucker, Jr., Christian D. Hum-phreys, McKenna Long and Aldridge, San Diego, California, for Appellees.
    Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alex Abou-Hussein appeals the district court’s- order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abou-Hussein v. Science Applications Int’l Corp., No. 2:09-cv-01858-RMG (D.S.C. May 3, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.