Case ID: f-appx_677/html/0130-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Kermit RICHARDS, III, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-7508
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: February 16, 2017
    Decided: February 22, 2017
    Edward Kermit Richards, III, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Sutherland Clark, Seema Mittal, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, Christopher John Romano, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge,- and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edward Kermit Richards, III, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Amendments 782 and 794 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Specifically, both of the Guidelines Amendments under which Richards sought a sentence reduction were in effect at the time of Richards’ February 2016 sentencing. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Richards, No. 1:14-cr-00385-CCB-1 (D. Md. Oct. 21, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED