Case ID: f-appx_242/html/0031-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alfred Lee MAULDIN, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Patricia STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
    No. 07-6643.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 21, 2007.
    Decided: June 29, 2007.
    
      Alfred Lee Mauldin, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed as modified by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Alfred Lee Mauldin seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition so he may refile it as an action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 408 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mauldin v. Stansberry, No. 5:07-hc-02002 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 2007). We modify the district court’s order, however, to reflect that the dismissal is without prejudice. We deny Mauldin’s motions to consolidate this appeal with No. 07-6199, an unrelated appeal pending in this court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.