Case ID: neb_50/html/0899-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Post, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George W. Douglas, appellant, v. William T. Smith, appellee.
    Filed March 17, 1897.
    No. 7176.
    Review: Questions oe Fact: Bill of Exceptions. One desiring to secure a review in this court of a ruling upon a question of fact is required to preserve the evidence by means of a bill of exceptions, allowed in the manner provided by law.
    Appeal from the district court of Webster county. Heard below before Beall, J.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    
      A. M. Walters, for appellant.
    
      J. S. Gilliam, contra.
    
   Post, C. J.

This was a proceeding by the plaintiff, George W. Douglas, in the district, court for Webster county to foreclose a certain real estate mortgage executed by Smith, the defendant. An answer was filed admitting the execution of the note and mortgage, and alleging as a defense thereto usury and payment in full, and which allegations were put in issue by the reply. A final decree was entered upon a finding in substantial accord with the allegations of the answer, and from which the plaintiff appeals.

No claim is made at this time that the decree is unsupported by the pleadings, the sole ground upon which a reversal is sought being the alleged insufficiency of the evidence. A paper purporting to be a bill of exceptions was at a previous term stricken from the files, on the ground that it was not allowed within the time or by any ■person authorized by law. The record accordingly presents for determination no question of law or fact, and the decree will therefore be affirmed. It is a rule settled by an unbroken line of decisions in this state that the unsuccessful party must preserve the evidence by means of a bill of exceptions in order to secure a review in this court of rulings upon questions of fact.

Affirmed.