Case ID: ad_5/html/0620-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William M. Hoes, as Public Administrator, etc., as Administrator, etc., of Alexander Hume, Deceased, Appellant, v. Thomas Hume, Respondent.
    Judgment affirmed, with costs.
   Per Curiam:

The rule laid down upon the previous appeal (Stebbins v Hume, 16 N. Y. St. Repr. 128) is the law of this case, so far as this court is concerned. The trial judge ruled precisely in accordance with the views there expressed by the General Term. We should, therefore, affirm his ruling. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. Present — Van Brunt, P. J., Barrett, Rumsey, O’Brien and Ingraham, JJ.