Case ID: f-appx_42/html/0982-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas Le’Roy HENNAGAN, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Brian T. MALLORY; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 01-17441.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 12, 2002 .
    Decided Aug. 16, 2002.
    Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Hennagan’s request for oral argument is therefore denied.
    
   MEMORANDUM

California state prisoner Thomas Hen-nagan, Jr. appeals pro se the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel in his civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the challenged order is not immediately appealable. See Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir.1993) (order) (concluding magistrate judge’s order was not appealable because the order could not form the basis of a final judgment without subsequent intervention by the district court); Kuster v. Block, 773 F.2d 1048, 1049 (9th Cir.1985) (holding that denial of counsel in section 1983 action is not immediately appealable).

All pending motions are denied as moot.

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.