Case ID: ny-st-rep_21/html/0434-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Barnard, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Patrick Riley, App’lt, v. The Town of Greenburgh, Resp’t.
    
      (Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department,
    
    
      Filed December 10, 1888.)
    
    Highways—Obstruction of—When town not liable for.
    Where a person is injured by falling off the end of a culvert built by the city of Hew York over an artificial passage for water overflowing from the Hew York city aqueduct, under authority of the legislature, the town is not liable. The obstruction in the highway, if it be one, is not' a nuisance, because it was legalized by the act of the legislature.
    Appeal from a judgment entered at a circuit court on the dismissal of the complaint after trial by jury.
    
      William B. Davidson, for app’lt; M. Q. Hart, for resp’t.
   Barnard, P. J.

The evidence fails to show an actionable negligence upon the part of the commissioners of highway of the town of Greenburgh. The accident was occasioned by the plaintiff falling off the end of a culvert. The culvert was not over one of the streams or ravines which crossed the highway but was an artificial passage for water from the aqueduct of the city of New York to the Sawmill river. Although the plaintiff speaks hesitatingly as to an old bridge where the new one was, the proof is overwhelming that there was no culvert until this one was ■erected. The city of New York was authorized to build the .aqueduct and all necessary accessories to its* completion and safety. This structure was one of them, and the city of New York made it to carry off the surplus water. The law is quite well settled in such a case that the obstruction .in the highway, if it be one, is not a nuisance, because it is legalized by act of the legislature. The city must keep the culvert in repair and generally make it safe for travel. Heacock v. Sherman, 14 Wendell, 58; Dygert v. Schenck, 23 id., 446; Hayes v. N. Y. C. and Hudson R. R. Co., 9 Hun, 63.

The town officers not only were free from the duty of protecting the culvert, but any interference with it in course of construction would have been unauthorized. Carpenter v. City of Cohoes, 81 N. Y., 21.

The complaint was therefore properly dismissed, and the judgment should be affirmed with costs.

Pratt, J., concurs; Dykman, J., not sitting.