Case ID: ga_125/html/0295-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Lumpkin, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Coody v. The State.
    Submitted April 17,
    Decided May 11, 1906.
    Indictment for misdemeanor. Before Judge Reagan. Butts superior court. May 10, 1906.
    
      Ray & Ray, for plaintiff in error.
    
      O. II. B. Bloodworth, solicitor-general, contra.
   Lumpkin, J.

1. It will not require a new trial that the presiding judge failed to charge the jury that they might consider the state of the feelings of the witnesses for the prosecution toward the accused;' there being no request to charge on that subject.

2. Considering the note of the presiding judge in connection with the grounds of the motion for a new trial, no error of law requiring a new trial was committed; and the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.