Case ID: so2d_561/html/0615-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. GERSTEN, Judge", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THOMSON, BOHRER, WERTH & RAZOOK, a Florida general partnership, et al., Appellants, v. MULTI RESTAURANT CONCEPTS, INC., et al., Appellees.
    No. 89-2455.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 1, 1990.
    Rehearing Denied June 22, 1990.
    Joseph P. Averill, Miami, for appellants.
    James E. Glass & Associates and James E. Glass, Miami, for appellees.
    Before NESBITT, BASKIN and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See, e.g., PaineWebber, Inc. v. Hess, 497 So.2d 1323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Fischer v. Rodriguez-Capriles, 472 So.2d 1315 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Wood-Hopkins Contracting Co. v. C.H. Barco Contracting Co., 301 So.2d 479 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); G & N Const. Co. v. Kirpatovsky, 181 So.2d 664 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966).

NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ., concur.

GERSTEN, Judge

(dissenting).

I respectfully dissent. I believe the provision in question is clear and I would reverse and remand for arbitration.