Case ID: sw3d_520/html/0826-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Clarence ORR, Appellant.
    No. ED 104428
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    Filed: June 20, 2017
    Evan J. Buchheim, 221 W. High St. PO Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Plaintiff/Respondent.
    Maleaner R. Harvey, 1010 Market St. Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Defen-danVAppellant.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J, and Colleen Dolan, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Clarence Orr (“Defendant”) appeals his conviction of one count of class B felony possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute in violation of § 195.211 (Count I) and one count of class A misdemeanor possession of a controlled substance in violation of § 195.202 (Count II). Defendant claims the trial court plainly erred in admitting the substance testing conclusions of the State’s criminalist ■witness Ms. Karen Fox and her lab report concerning State’s Exhibits 1-A and 1-B. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).