Case ID: f-appx_49/html/0480-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carey Floyd FAIRCLOTH, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-7200.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 24, 2002.
    Decided Oct. 31, 2002.
    Carey Floyd Faircloth, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Carey Floyd Faircloth seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Faircloth has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Faircloth, No. CR-98-23-F; CA-99-180-7-F (E.D.N.C. filed May 1 & June 28, 2002; entered May 2 & July 1, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal ability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.