Case ID: pr_43/html/0277-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Wole", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Augusto Saavedra Riquelme, Petitioner, v. Hon. Rafael Sancho Bonet, etc., et al., Respondents.
    
      No. 54.
    Argued March 14, 1932. —
    Decided March 30, 1932.
    
      José Sabaten for petitioner. Martínez Nadal & Martirífiz Rivera for respondent spouses, Saavedra-Feliciano.
   Mr. Justice Wole

delivered the opiuiou of the Court.

For the reasons assigned in • the ease of Saavedra v. District Court, mandamus, ante, page 274, we feel bound, to hold that Judge Sancho Bonet had no authority to act, and therefore an order will issue to him prohibiting him from acting in the case of Adolfo Saavedra Solá et ux. v. Augusto Saavedra Riquelme et ux., No. 9,305, to which the petition in this case refers.