Case ID: sw2d_32/html/1114-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MORROW, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Clifford HAMILTON, alias Jack O’Neil, v. STATE.
    No. 14014.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Nov. 12, 1930.
    Henry Houston Jones, of Austin, for appellant.
    Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.
   MORROW, P. J.

Theft by conversion is the offense; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

There are no complaints of the action of the trial court in the introduction of evidence or instruction to the jury. It is stated in the motion for new trial that the evidence is insufficient. This court is not informed as to what evidence was before the court, as no statement of facts accompanies the record. The judgment is affirmed.

HAWKINS, J., absent.