Case ID: so2d_421/html/0002-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert John HART and Charles Ray Hewitt, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 81-1231.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Aug. 18, 1982.
    Rehearings Denied Nov. 17, 1982.
    Alan Jay Braverman of Law Offices of Alan Jay Braverman, P.A., Fort Lauder-dale, for appellant Hart.
    Jeffrey Mark Harris, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant Hewitt.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert L. Bogen, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. We believe the trial court acted correctly in denying the motion to suppress; State v. Richards, 388 So.2d 573 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), cert. denied 397 So.2d 778 (Fla.1981), 102 S.Ct. 359; in submitting the issue of constructive possession to the jury; Winchell v. State, 362 So.2d 992 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); in denying the motions to dismiss and suppress; Frisbie v. Collins, 342 U.S. 519, 72 S.Ct. 509, 96 L.Ed. 541 (1952); in instructing the jury on constructive possession; Lacy v. State, 387 So.2d 561 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); and in upholding the constitutionality of the drug trafficking statute; State v. Benitez, 395 So.2d 514 (Fla.1981).

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and BERANEK, JJ., concur.