Case ID: ad_245/html/0791-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William A. Fabian, Jr., an Infant, by Wilhelmina Fabian, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Schenectady Rapid Transit, Inc., Appellant.
   Appeal by defendant from an order denying its motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. There is nothing in the newly-discovered evidence which would justify the conclusion that it would change the result if a new trial were granted. The same judge who presided at the trial heard the motion for a new trial and denied the application. The order appealed from is discretionary and should be affirmed. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.