Case ID: so2d_608/html/0132-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles Nathan FOX, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-835.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 10, 1992.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Consuelo Maingot and Francine Thomas, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ
   PER CURIAM.

Because the appellant’s sole point on the merits presents only harmless error, State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986), the convictions under review are affirmed. The cause is remanded for resentencing within the appropriate cell without including legal constraint points under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701 d. 6. The fact that the defendant was on felony bond when the offenses were committed does not permit such an assessment. Brown v. State, 569 So.2d 1223 (Fla.1990); Mosely v. State, 543 So.2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Mize v. State, 495 So.2d 845 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.