Case ID: ny-sup-ct_94/html/0617-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Cullen, J.:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph H. Newins and Another, Plaintiffs, v. H. Eckford Rose, Defendant.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs.

All concur.

No opinion.

Cullen, J.:

I vote to affirm without opinion. The testimony of Seaman that he did not sell the goods to defendant was erroneously admitted against defendant’s objection and exceptions and was a mere statement of conclusion. He did not state what the transaction was nor deny defendant’s statement that nothing was said between them reserving the goods plaintiffs had sold Seaman.