Case ID: sw3d_64/html/0867-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Tara Lee MENTE, Respondent, v. Remy Arthur MENTE, Appellant.
    No. ED 78620.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Jan. 15, 2002.
    Stephen Roy Fleddermann, St. Charles, MO, for Appellant.
    Mary Ann Weems, Clayton, MO, for Respondent.
    Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., and SIMON and MARY K. HOFF, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Remy Arthur Mente (“husband”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County dissolving his marriage to respondent Tara Lee Mente (“wife”). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and conclude the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision.