Case ID: so3d_132/html/1114-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Amy HINMAN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. SC12-2501.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Jan. 16, 2014.
    Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, Maria E. Lauredo, Chief Assistant Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Assistant Public Defender, Miami, FL, for Petitioner.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, Richard L. Polin, Bureau Chief Criminal Appeals, and Keri T. Jo-sesph, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, FL, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in State v. Hinman, 100 So.3d 220 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

LEWIS, J., dissents.