Case ID: njl_72/html/0353-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Fort, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. RUDOLPH F. HARNED, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued February 21, 1905
    Decided June 12, 1905.
    On error to Burlington Quarter Sessions.
    Before Gummere, Chief Justice, and Justices Fort and Garretson.
    For the plaintiff in error, Sherrerd Depue and Samuel Kalisch, and Samuel Pennington Rotan (of the Pennsylvania bar).
    For the defendant in error, Samuel A. Atkinson, Theodore Baches and Robert PL. McCarter, attorney-general.
   The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fort, J.

This case is determined by the opinion in the case of State v. Davis, decided at this present term. ,The only difference in the two cases is that the defendant in this case shot at a pigeon as a target and missed it. He intended to hit it. He did not. Such shooting, under the statute, is a misdemeanor.

The judgment is affirmed.