Case ID: ga-app_8/html/0852-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Russeix, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

2691.
    Peek v. City of Atlanta.
    Decided January 24,
    — Rehearing denied February 22, 1911.
    Certiorari; from Fulton superior court — Judge Bell. April 15, 1910.
    
      F. M. Hughes, Morris Machs, for plaintiff, in error.
    
      J. L. Mayson, W. D. Ellis Jr., contra.
   Russeix, J.

1. There was no error in overruling the certiorari.

2. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the conviction of the defendant for violating what is known as the “traveling blind-tiger ordinance” of the city of Atlanta. All the assignments of error other than that the conviction of the defendant was contrary to evidence are controlled by the rulings in Callaway v. Mims, 5 Ga. App. 9 (62 S. E. 654), Athens v. Atlanta, 6 Ga. App. 244 (64 S. E. 711), Allen v. Jennings, 134 Ga. 338 (67 S. E. 883), and Loeb v. Jennings, 133 Ga. 796 (67 S. E. 101).

Judgment affirmed.