Case ID: nys_99/html/1135-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BOOTH, Respondent, v. MILLIKEN, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    July 12, 1906.)
    Appeal from Special Term, New York County. Action by Arthur C. Booth against William A. Milliken. From an order denying an application to vacate a warrant of attachment, defendant appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Ernest W. Marlow, for appellant.
    R. Burnham Moffat, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from should be affirmed. We observe, however, that the undertaking here is inadequate; but that is a matter which the defendant can remedy by a proper application in the court below. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.