Case ID: ad3d_83/html/0963-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Johnson, Appellant.
    [920 NYS2d 710]
   Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Braun, J.), rendered November 18, 2009, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the factfinder’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004], cert denied 542 US 946 [2004]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt with respect to two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]; People v Tutt, 194 AD2d 575, 575-576 [1993]; People v Delvas, 181 AD2d 740, 740 [1992]). A police officer, who had pulled the defendant’s vehicle over for failing to use a turn signal, retrieved a loaded firearm from inside the vehicle, after he observed it protruding from a bag located on the front passenger-side floor. Under the circumstances of this case, the factfinder properly invoked the “automobile presumption” pursuant to Penal Law § 265.15 (3) in finding the defendant guilty of two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. Dillon, J.P., Florio, Chambers and Miller, JJ., concur.