Case ID: so2d_555/html/0427-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Olga M. FRAGA, Appellant, v. Antonio O. FRAGA, Appellee.
    Nos. 88-853, 88-2200 and 88-2292.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 26, 1989.
    Rehearing Denied Feb. 13, 1990.
    Young, Stern & Tannenbaum and Glen Rafkin and Andrew S. Berman, North Miami Beach, for appellant.
    Barranco, Kellough & Kircher, Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton Meadow & Olin; Daniels & Hicks and Angela C. Flowers and Sam Daniels, Miami, for appellee.
    Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We find no abuse of discretion in the overall equitable distribution, Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). We note, however, that the amended final judgment, section V, contains the incorrect statement that the permanent alimony award is predicated upon appellant’s receiving certain tax-free payments. Under the amended judgment there will be no tax-free payments. We therefore remand for correction of the amended final judgment and such further consideration of the terms of the award as may be equitable under the circumstances.

Affirmed and remanded for further consistent proceedings.