Case ID: kan_66/html/0779-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The City of Holton v. Maggie M. Hicks.
    No. 12,795.
    (71 Pac. 1126.)
    Error from Jackson district court; Marshall G-ephart, judge.
    Opinion filed March 7, 1903.
    Affirmed.
    
      M. A. Bender, city attorney, and Say den da Say den, for plaintiff in error.
    
      John S. Sopkins, Welch di Welch, and Crane <& WoodTyurn, for defendant in error.
   Per Curiam:

No material error was committed by the court in the admission of testimony, nor in charging the jury. There is some confusion in the special findings, but, fairly interpreted, they sustain the general verdict, and the rulings thereon furnish no reason for reversal.

The judgment is affirmed.