Case ID: so3d_193/html/1016-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Andrew Olan NOELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D15-5352.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 3, 2016.
    Gilbert A. Schaffnit, Gainesville, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jillian H. R.eding and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm, in part, the denial of the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to strike the appellant’s designation as a sexual offender for count II (unlawful use of a two-way communications device) on the written judgment and sentence, as that offense does not qualify for sexual offender designation under section 943,0435(l)(a)l., Florida Statutes (2012). Because it is a ministerial act, the appellant need not be present. See Bauder v. State, 983 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED in part with directions.

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS and RAY, JJ., concur.