Case ID: so2d_738/html/1030-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

211 EAST CALL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellant, v. P. Kevin DAVEY, Appellee.
    No. 98-2200.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Aug. 25, 1999.
    Carl R. Pennington, Jr., and Cynthia S. Tunnicliff of Pennington, Moore, Wilkinson, Bell & Dunbar, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    David A. Barrett and A. Dean Johnson of Barrett & Pelham, Tallahassee, for Ap-pellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Finding no error in the trial court’s application of law to the undisputed facts, we affirm the summary final judgment. We decline to address the propriety of the trial court’s finding that the “complaint ... fail[ed] to state a justiciable issue of either law or fact” because, there having been no ruling that appellee is entitled to attorney fees on that basis, any issue that might involve that finding is not yet ripe.

AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER, DAVIS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.