Case ID: so2d_632/html/1143-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PLANTATION KARATE CENTER, INC., Appellant, v. • Richard RANDALL and Florida Amkor Moo Duk Kwan, Inc., d/b/a Nob Hill Karate Center, Appellees.
    No. 92-3041.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    March 9, 1994.
    Jeffrey A. Sarrow of Jeffrey A. Sarrow, P.A., Plantation, for appellant.
    No appearance for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the propriety of the trial court’s order awarding attorney’s fees pursuant to section 57.105(1), Florida Statutes. We agree and reverse. Our review of appellant’s complaint and the transcript of the hearing held in connection with appellant’s request for a temporary injunction leads us to reject the trial court’s finding that there was a complete absence of a justiciable issue of either law or fact raised by appellant’s action for trademark infringement.

REVERSED.

DELL, C.J., and POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.