Case ID: nj-eq_84/html/0207-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary A. Wootton et al., respondents, v. Michael Seltzer et al., appellants.
    [Argued November 19th, 1914.
    Decided March 1st, 1915.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning, whose opinion is reported in 83 N. J. Eq. 163.
    
    
      Messrs. Wilson & Carr, for the respondents.
    
      Messrs. Bourgeois & Coulomb, for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Leaming.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, Bogert, Vredenburgh, White, Heppenheimer — 12.

For reversal — None.