Case ID: pa-super_217/html/0084-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam, Montgomery, J.:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Commonwealth v. Kriner, Appellant.
    Argued March 17, 1970.
    Before Wright, P. J., Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, and Cercone, JJ.
    
      Leonard J. Gajewski, for appellant.
    
      Grant E. Wesner, Assistant District Attorney, with him Robert L. Van Hoove, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
    June 11, 1970:
   Opinion

Per Curiam,

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Dissenting Opinion by

Montgomery, J.:

I respectfully dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in the companion case, Commonwealth v. Kriner, 217 Pa. Superior Ct. 81, 266 A. 2d 787 (1970). Therefore, I find it unnecessary to comment upon the additional contentions of appellant in support of his motion for a new trial.

Hoffman and Cercone, JJ., join in this dissenting opinion.