Case ID: sw2d_272/html/0802-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Otis SANDUSKY, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.
    Court of Appeals of Kentucky.
    Nov. 12, 1954.
    Shumate & Shumate and Thomas D. Shu-mate, Richmond, for appellant.
    J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., Wm. F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We are affirming the judgment in this case for a $50 fine and 60 days in jail because we think (1) the use of the word ‘.‘liquor” in the warrant was sufficient to inform the-appellánt of the nature of the charge against him; and (2) the affidavit in support of the search warrant was regular on its face.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.