Case ID: f-appx_121/html/0922-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Anthony A. ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 03-1783.
    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    Feb. 28, 2005.
    
      Max Minzner, Assistant United States Attorney, for Roslynn R. Mauskopf, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York (Emily Berger, on the brief), for Appellant.
    Steven M. Statsinger, Legal Aid Society, New York, NY, for D ef endant-App elle e.
    Present: KEARSE, CALABRESI, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF, District Judge.
    
    
      
       The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.
    
   SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the case be and it hereby is REMANDED.

In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, - L.Ed.2d - (2005), and this Court’s decision in United States v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103 (2d Cir.2005), this case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings in conformity with Crosby.

Any appeal taken from the district court following this remand and resentencing, if it occurs, can be initiated only by filing a new notice of appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 3, 4(b).

A party will not waive or forfeit any appropriate argument on remand or on any appeal post-remand by not filing a petition for rehearing of this remand order.