Case ID: wash_65/html/0701-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 9643.
    Department One.
    November 14, 1911.]
    W. H. Bolen, Respondent, v. F. W. Llewellyn, Appellant.
      
    
    Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for King county, Ronald, J„ entered February 25, 1911, upon findings in favor of tbe plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before tbe court without a jury, in an action on contract.
    Affirmed.
    
      Fred Llewellyn, pro se.
    
    
      Douglas, Lane & Douglas (W. H. Bolen, of counsel), for respondent.
    
      
       Reported in 118 Pac. 1118.
    
   Per Curiam.

— This was an action to recover damages for tbe breach of an alleged contract of employment. Tbe case was tried to tbe court without a jury. Tbe court found upon tbe evidence that a definite contract bad been entered into between tbe parties and breached by tbe defendant. A judgment for $300 damages was entered for tbe plaintiff. Tbe defendant has appealed.

Tbe only question presented here, as below, is one of fact, and is whether a definite contract was entered into. We have carefully read tbe record and are not convinced that tbe trial court was in error. A review of tbe evidence is unnecessary.

judgment affirmed.