Case ID: ohio-st-3d_62/html/0202-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State, ex rel. Hadlock, Appellant, v. Corrigan, Judge, Appellee.
    [Cite as State, ex rel. Hadlock, v. Corrigan (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 202.]
    (No. 91-1273
    Submitted September 17, 1991
    Decided December 11, 1991.)
    
      Wes Hadlock, pro se.
    
    
      Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Prosecuting Attorney, and Laurence R. Snyder, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. None of appellant’s claims challenges the sentencing court’s jurisdiction; therefore, appeal and post-conviction relief are adequate remedies at law.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.