Case ID: f-appx_239/html/0082-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Nathan REYES, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-10723
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Aug. 30, 2007.
    Christy Lee Drake, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Amarillo, TX, Nancy E. Larson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Bonita L Gunden, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Amarillo, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before WIENER, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Nathan Reyes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed an amended brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Reyes has filed a response in which he claims, inter alia, that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move for a judgment of acquittal.

Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Reyes’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cm. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.