Case ID: so3d_18/html/1252-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert KINGSLAND and B.K. Ranch, L.C., Appellants, v. MATEER & HARBERT, P.A., et al., Appellees.
    No. 5D08-2544.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Oct. 9, 2009.
    James D. Kisio, of James D. Kisio, P.A., Longwood, for Appellant.
    W. Scott Gabrielson and John D. Hane-brink, of Mateer & Harbert, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee, Mateer & Harbert, P.A.
    Charles J. Meltz and T’Anjuiming A. Marx, of Grower, Ketcham, Rutherford, Bronson, Eide & Telan, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee, Baker & Fuller, P.A.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the amended order of the trial court dismissing the third-party complaint filed by appellants, Robert Kings-land and B.K. Ranch, L.C., against the appellees, Mateer & Harbert, P.A., and Baker & Fuller, P.A. We note for the benefit of the parties and the trial court, however, that our disposition of this appeal does not serve as an adjudication on the merits of the current first-party claim by the appellants against the appellees.

AFFIRMED.

MONACO, C.J, PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.