Case ID: njl_6/html/0371-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State against Fisler.
    The answer to the interrogations, in case of an attachment for a contempt, must ho delivered ore tenus.
    
    Fisler in this case, being called upon to answer interrogatories upon an attachment for contempt, a question arose whether he should make his answers ore tenus or in writing.
   Per Curiam.

The answers must be made ore tenus.

The defendant being then called up and sworn, the interrogatories were severally proposed to him, and he answered them from a printed paper, which he held in his hand, containing answers to each of the interrogatories; after-wards he signed the printed answers, and they were annexed to the interrogatory. 
      
      The counsel had the, answers printed, because the defendant was incapable of reading manuscript, ut audivi.