Case ID: ny-st-rep_66/html/0871-13.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Cullen, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph H. Newins et al., App'lts, v. H. Eckford Rose, Resp’t.
    Sup. Ct., 2 D.,
    May 13, 1895.
    
      George F. Stackpole, for app’ts; Arington H. Carman, for resp’t.
   Cullen, J.

I vote to affirm, without opinion. The testimony of Seaman that he did not sell the goods to defendant was erroneously admitted against •defendant’s objection and exceptions, and was a mere statement of conclusion. He did not state wliat the transaction was, nor deny defendant’s statement, that nothing was said between them reserving the goods plaintiffs had sold Seaman.