Case ID: njl_48/html/0371-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "The Chancellor.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE STATE, JAMES DUFFY, PROSECUTOR, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. EUGENE BRITTON, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    Error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Supreme Court see 18 Vroom 251.
    For the plaintiff in error, H. M. Nevius.
    
    For the defendant in error, W. A. Heisley.
    
   The Chancellor.

The judgment of the Supreme Court in this case should be affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Knapp, Mague, Parker, Reed, Van Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, McG-regíor, Paterson, Whitaker. 14.

For reversal—Hone.