Case ID: ad2d_27/html/0662-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Anna E. Gassner, Appellant, v. Board of Examiners of the City of New York, Respondent.
   Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 16, 1966, reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remitted to Special Term for a hearing to determine the objectivity of the standards contained in the rating schedule applied in measuring petitioner’s relative training and experience. No questions' of fact were considered. Petitioner’s qualifications must be rated by objective standards (Matter of Fink v. Finegan, 270 N. Y. 356). The requirement of objectivity is not meaningful in this case unless the rating schedule employed is open to review by the courts. Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur. [51 Misc 2d 467.]