Case ID: f-appx_416/html/0258-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R.C. MATHENA, Warden; J. Kiser, Assistant Warden; Mr. Baker, Psychologist; D. Vass, ICA Classification Director; Central Classification, Name Unknown; John Garmin, Regional Director; Mr. Former, Counselor; Rod Wicker, Chaplain; Major Newberry, Security; Captain Gayheart, Security; Lieutenant Honaker, Security; Sergeant Ratliff; Sergeant White; Reynolds, C/O; J. Vass, Programs; Miller, C/O, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 10-7686.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 25, 2011.
    Decided: March 10, 2011.
    David W. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees Ratliff and Miller.
    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

David W. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing some of his claims. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 837 U.S. 541, 545-6, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Williams seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appeal-able interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.