Case ID: f-appx_474/html/0999-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anthony MCNEISH, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BIG SARGE BAIL BONDS ASSOCIATES INC.; Manley Yates; John Doe, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 12-6633.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 1, 2012.
    Decided: Aug. 10, 2012.
    Anthony McNeish, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony McNeish appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint after it was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McNeish v. Big Sarge Bail Bonds Assocs., No. 5:1 1-cv-00739-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.