Case ID: f-appx_571/html/0508-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re John O. MURRIN, III, Respondent-Appellant.
    No. 14-1371.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 17, 2014.
    Filed: July 22, 2014.
    John O. Murrin, III, Long Beach, CA, pro se.
    Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Attorney John Murrin appeals the district court’s order effectively reinstating an earlier court order suspending him from practicing law in the District of Minnesota. Upon careful review, we con-elude that Murrin’s constitutional arguments are without merit, and we find no abuse of discretion. See In re Hoare, 155 F.3d 937, 940 (8th Cir.1998) (disciplinary orders are reviewed for abuse of discretion; district court’s authority to suspend attorney is inherent power derived from attorney’s role as officer of court). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.