Case ID: nj-eq_65/html/0763-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard D. Norton, complainant and respondent, v. William D. Perrine et al., defendants and appellants.
    (Filed August 19th, 1903.]
    
      Mr. Howard IF. 'Hayes, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. ’Adrian 8. Appelget, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

In this case the order of the court of chancery overruling the demurrer is affirmed, for the same reasons assigned in the case of Warwick v. Perrine, decided at the present term. See p. 735 ante.

For affirmance — Yan Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Hendrickson, Swayze, Bogert, Yredenburgi-i, Yroom, Green —10.

For reversal — None.