Case ID: f-appx_190/html/0537-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ricardo TORRES-ACOSTA, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 04-10487.
    D.C. No. CR-03-02048-RCC.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    June 22, 2006.
    Bruce M. Ferg, Esq., Anne E. Mosher, Esq., USTU — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Evo A. Deconcini, U.S. Courthouse, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff — Appellee.
    Brian I. Rademacher, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant — Appellant.
    
      Before: D.W. NELSON, RAWLINSON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

The memorandum disposition filed on November 14, 2005 is amended to add the following numbered paragraph on page 3:

6. The record does not reflect that the district court was of the view that it lacked authority to grant a downward departure. In such a circumstance, we lack jurisdiction to review the denial of a downward departure. See United, States v. Govan, 152 F.3d 1088,1095 (9th Cir.1998).

With this amendment, Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing filed on December 9, 2005, is DENIED.

No further filings will be accepted in this case. 
      
       This order is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.