Case ID: ga_105/html/0466-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Fish, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stith v. Satterfield.
    Argued February 18,
    Decided March 24, 1898.
    Motion to reinstate. Before Judge Eite. Bartow superior court. July term, 1897.
    
      J. B. Conyers and J. M. Neel, for plaintiff.
    
      J. W. Harris, J. W. Akin and J. II. Wikle, for defendant.
   Fish, J.

In view of all the facts disclosed by the record, it does not appear that there was any abuse of discretion in refusing to reinstate the plaintiff’s action.

.Judgment affirmed.

All concurring, except Cobb, J., absent.