Case ID: f-appx_520/html/0215-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael A. SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH; Kenneth W. Stolle; Paul J. Lanteigne; F.V. Williams; Sylvester Williams; John Newton; Cassandra Lee; Steve Wilke; J. Manigo; John Doe; Marc F. Schuster; Victoria Thomson, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 12-2578.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 19, 2013.
    Decided: May 2, 2013.
    Michael A Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Beverly, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Virginia Beach, Virginia; David Brandt Oakley, POOLE MAHONEY PC, Chesapeake, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Scott appeals the district court orders and judgment granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss, denying his motion to amend the complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Scott v. City of Virginia Beach, No. 2:10-cv-00625-RAJDEM (E.D.Va., Sept. 29, 2011; April 4, 2012; Nov. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.