Case ID: ad2d_308/html/0395-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(September 25, 2003)
    The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Corniel, Appellant.
    [764 NYS2d 626]
   —Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered May 19, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of eight years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to reduce the sentence to seven years, and otherwise affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]).

The trial court’s decision to preclude a defense witness was not an improvident exercise of discretion (see People v Aska, 91 NY2d 979 [1998]).

We reject defendant’s conflict of interest claim, and agree with the reasoning of the court in Skinner v Duncan (2003 WL 21386032, *40-49, 2003 US Dist LEXIS 10102, *144-181 [SD NY, June 17, 2003]), which rejected a similar claim involving the same defense attorney.

We find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Tom, Ellerin, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.