Case ID: pa-super_136/html/0016-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jennings v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company, Appellant.
    
      Argued April 17, 1939.
    Before Keller, P. J., Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadtfeld, Parker, Rhodes and Hirt, JJ.
    
      June 27, 1939:
    
      P. E. M other al, with him Reed, Smith, Shaw & Mc-Olay, for appellant.
    
      E. D. Brown, with him W. Brown Higbee, for appellee.
   Pee Cueiam,

For the reasons so clearly stated by Judge Caee, of the court below, in his dissenting opinion, which will be found in the reporter’s statement, we are of opinion that the judgment on the award in favor of the claimant must be reversed and judgment entered for the defendant.

It is so ordered. 
      
       See also Elder v. Penna. R. R. Co., 118 Pa. Superior Ct. 137, 148, 180 A. 183; Martini v. Director General, 77 Pa. Superior Ct. 529, 534; Phila. & R. Ry. Co. v. Di Donato, 256 U. S. 327, 329; Bauchspies v. Central R. of N. J., 287 Pa. 590, 135 A. 728; Glunt v. Penna. R. R. Co., 249 Pa. 522, 95 A. 109.