Case ID: ohio-st-3d_72/html/0525-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cleveland Bar Association v. Bancsi.
    [Cite as Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Bancsi (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 525.]
    (No. 95-377
    Submitted April 4, 1995
    Decided July 26, 1995.)
    
      
      Stewart & DeChant Co., L.P.A., and Scott E. Stewart; Rabat, Mielziner & Sobel and Christina M. Janice; and Mary Cibella, for relator.
    
      Peterson & Zelasko and Michael H. Peterson, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record and concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommended sanction. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 9-102(A) and (B)(3), and 2-110(A)(2). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.