Case ID: njl_117/html/0149-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CARL J. RAHM, APPELLANT, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Argued June 2, 1936
    Decided October 2, 1936.
    Por the appellant, Joseph T. Lieblich.
    
    Por the respondents, Arthur T. Vanderbilt.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.