Case ID: mass-l-rptr_8/html/0545-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Fremont-Smith, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel F. Case v. Elmer Narrow
    Superior Court, Worcester, SS
    No. 980330B
    Memorandum Dated June 12, 1998
   Fremont-Smith, J.

After hearing, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is denied.

Atlantic Savings Bank v. Metropolitan Bank, 9 Mass.App.Ct. 286 (1980), holds that a subsequent mortgage subordinates a prior homestead to the mortgage lien, id., 288, but does not hold that such a mortgage extinguishes the homestead as to all subsequent creditors. M.G.L.c. 188, §7 provides that “an estate of homestead created under §2 may be terminated during a lifetime of the owner by either of the following methods: — (1) a deed conveying the properly in which an estate of homestead exists ... which does not specifically reserve said estate of homestead; or by (2) a release of the estate of the homestead ...” The statute does not, however, state that a mortgage is to be deemed the equivalent of “a deed,” for this purpose.

To construe this language to extinguish a homestead vis a vis other than the mortgagee would effectively eliminate homestead protection as to all other subsequent creditors each time a homeowner refinanced or otherwise gave a mortgage on property. It is not reasonable to conclude that the legislature, by enacting Chapter 188, §7, intended such a drastic result, and Atlantic Savings Bank does not so hold.