Case ID: ala-app_22/html/0084-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BRICKEN, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(112 So. 540)
    SMITH v. STATE.
    (8 Div. 474.)
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    April 19, 1927.
    O. M. Raines, of Scottsboro, for appellant.
    Charlie C. McCall-, Atty. Gen., for the State.
    No briefs reached the Reporter.
   BRICKEN, P. J.

From a judgment of conviction for distilling alcoholic or spirituous liquors, and for the possession of a still to be used for that purpose, this appeal was taken.

There was direct evidence tending to show that this appellant was at work at a still which was in operation. The written charge refused to defendant means nothing. It reads: “I charge you, gentlemen of the jury, if you believe from the evidence you will acquit Def.” It was properly refused. We discover no error of a reversible nature in this record, and therefore order that the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken be affirmed.

Affirmed.