Case ID: ny-st-rep_51/html/0142-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Fitzsimons, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sarah McHugh, Adm’rx, Resp’t, v. Jules Astrophe, Ex’r, App’lt.
    
      (City Court, of New York, General Term,
    
    
      Filed February 8, 1893.)
    
    1. Calendar — Short cause.
    Any cause may be taken out of its regular place on the calendar and made a preferred cause, and a speedy trial ordered, if justice so requires, even though it be an equity case.
    2. Same.
    The fact that the order recites that the trial shall take place in a part of the court not designated for the trial of equity causes is not material where it has been regarded as a clerical error, and the cause placed on the calendar of the proper part.
    3. Same — Motion costs.
    Such an order should not be granted where the plaintiff has failed to pay motion costs awarded to defendant by a prior general term.
    Appeal from order directing that the cause be placed on the short cause calendar.
    
      Emile B. Morel, for resp’t; Booraem, Hamilton & Beckett, for app’lt.
   Fitzsimons, J.

This being an equity action the trial must be without a jury.

The order appealed from does not attempt to take away that right

The action was ordered for trial as a preferred cause on the short cause calendar, which is in the court a calendar made up of equity causes and actions on contract that may be tried within one hour.

The fact that the said order recites that the trial shall take place in Part 2 instead of Part 4, the latter being the equity trial part, is inconsequential, plainly a clerical error, and was so regarded by the calendar clerk and the attorneys for the parties hereto, because the action was actually placed on Part 4 calendar and there appeared and was answered to by said attorneys.

The justice sitting in that, part when it appeared for trial will try it without a jury as are all equity actions tried.

The justice who made the order had a right to do so, if in the interests of justice he deemed it proper to order a speedy trial herein.

The appellant cannot complain, having received due notice of trial.

Any cause may be taken out of its regular place on the calendar by the court and made a preferred cause and a speedy trial ordered if, as above stated, justice so requires.

• This is an inherent right which the court has and does not depend upon nor is it restricted by any section of the Code of Civil Procedure. 5 Civ. Pro., 66.

The only objection to the order is, that respondent failed to pay the costs awarded appellant by a prior general term of this court

The costs so awarded were motion costs, and until paid all proceedings of respondent are stayed by virtue of § 779 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

For this reason the order appealed from must be reversed; but without costs, with leave to respondent to apply again for such an order upon payment of the unpaid costs just mentioned.

McGrOwn and Van Wyck, JJ., concur.