Case ID: ohio-st-2d_62/html/0143-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State, ex rel. West, Appellant, v. Price, Judge, Appellee.
    [Cite as State, ex rel. West, v. Price (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 143.]
    (No. 79-1493
    Decided May 7, 1980.)
    
      
      Messrs. Hershey & Browne and Mr. John L. Wolfe, for appellant.
    
      Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs Co., L.P.A., Mr. John M. Glenn and Mr. Robert M. Gippin, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

The orders denying the motions to compel discovery are subject to review on an appeal from the final judgment of the trial court. Mandamus is not a substitute for appeal. State, ex rel. Marshall, v. Keller (1968), 15 Ohio St. 2d 203, 205.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is, therefore, affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.