Case ID: pa-super_97/html/0113-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Steinberg v. Canady, Appellant.
    Argued October 2, 1929.
    Before Porter, P. J., Trexler, Keller, Linn, Gawthrop, Cunningham and Baldrige, JJ.
    
      October 7, 1929:
    
      J. Jerome Katz, and Philip Dorfman, for appellant.
    
      Abraham Berhoivitz, and I. Sidney Bass, for appellee.
   Per Curiam,

This was an action of assumpsit to recover on a check of which payment had been stopped. The appeal raises no question worthy of discussion.

The judgment is affirmed.