Case ID: nj_59/html/0525-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THOMAS B. KING, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Argued December 7, 1971
    Decided December 13, 1971.
    
      Mr. Joseph A. Fusco, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Essex County-Prosecutor, attorney).
    
      Mr. Piar tin L. Greenberg argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Stamley G. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney; Mr. Philip Freedman, on the brief).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed for the reasons expressed in its opinion. (112 N. J. Super. 138)

For affirmance: Chief Justice Weintraub and .Justices Jacobs, Proctor, Halt, and Schettino—5.

For reversal: None.