Case ID: sw3d_458/html/0452-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Piotr CHORAZY, Appellant.
    No. ED 100883
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    
    Filed: March 17, 2015
    Raymond R. Bolourtchi, Coffman & Bol-ourtchi, LLC, 8866 Ladue Road, Suite 250, St. Louis, Missouri 63124, for Appellant.
    Evan' J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Piotr Chorazy (Defendant) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.07(d) motion to set aside his guilty plea following his. convictions for possession of a controlled substance and driving with a suspended license. Defendant claims that his guilty plea was involuntary because his attorney (1) failed to properly inform him of the immigration consequences of his plea and; (2) failed to file a motion to suppress evidence. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that trial court did not err in denying Defendant’s Rule 29.07(d) motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).