Case ID: f-appx_390/html/0223-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Howell W. WOLTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dennis BAILEY, individually and in his official capacity; James Pendergraph, individually and in his official capacity; Mecklenburg County Jail, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 09-7119.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 27, 2010.
    Decided: Aug. 4, 2010.
    Howell W. Woltz, Appellant pro se.
    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Howell W. Woltz appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Woltz v. Bailey, No. 3:09-ev-00211-GCM, 2009 WL 1564142 (W.D.N.C. June 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.