Case ID: sw_236/html/0473-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HAWKINS, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

KOLOS v. STATE.
    (No. 6582.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Jan. 4, 1922.) .
    Criminal law <§=»! 109(3) — Appeal may be dismissed for deficiency in transcript.
    Wliere a transcript on an appeal in a criminal prosecution bears no caption, is not indexed, contains many instruments not necessary, and fails to show a judgment of any kind, the appeal will be dismissed.
    Appeal from Lavaca County Court; J. A. Sommerlatte, Judge.
    Frank Kolos was convicted of using abusive language, and he appeals.
    Appeal dismissed.
    R. G. Storey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for abusive language, and from some of the recitals in the transcript it appears that a fine of $25 was assessed. The transcript bears no caption, is not indexed, contains many instruments not necessary for the transcript to show and is totally deficient in that no final judgment, or judgment of any kind, is shown.

The appeal is therefore ordered dismissed.