Case ID: so2d_656/html/0583-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frank ALDERMAN and Elizabeth B. Alderman, Appellants, v. TYNDALL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Appellee.
    No. 94-98.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 20, 1995.
    Rehearing Denied July 20, 1995.
    Frank J. Alderman, Panama City Beach, pro se.
    Melissa D. Munroe of Trimmier & Hayley, Panama City, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s decision comes to this court clothed with a presumption of correctness, and the burden was upon appellants to demonstrate error. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979). A transcript of the trial proceedings was not furnished to this court nor did appellants submit a stipulated statement of the evidence. See Rule 9.200(b)(4) and (e), Fla. R.App.P. Under the circumstances, appellants have failed to demonstrate reversible error, and we AFFIRM.

BOOTH, JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.