Case ID: f-appx_141/html/0195-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carl Benit COOPER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Arthur F. BEELER, Warden, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 04-7487.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 3, 2005.
    Decided: Aug. 23, 2005.
    Carl Benit Cooper, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Carl Benit Cooper appeals a district court judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Cooper v. Beeler, No. CA-04-551-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 25, 2005). We also deny Cooper’s motion for summary judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED