Case ID: sw2d_979/html/0499-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SHAEFER-MEYER SEED-SOD DIVISION, INC., and Greg Shaw, Respondents, v. HILLSIDE GARDENS, INC., Appellant.
    No. 73508.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Oct. 27, 1998.
    David W. Suddarth, Troy, for appellant.
    Frank K. Keefe, EUisville, for respondents.
    Before HOFF, P. J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for defendant in a breach of contract case. The evidence in support of the verdict is not insufficient. No error of law appears.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).