Case ID: so2d_591/html/0356-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Louisiana v. David A. MARKS.
    No. K91-919.
    Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
    Aug. 23, 1991.
    Writ Granted March 26, 1992.
    
      David A. Marks, pro se.
    Paul Reggie, Asst. Dist. Atty., Lake Charles, for the State.
    Before GUIDRY, FORET and KING, JJ.
   WRIT DENIED: Dilaudid is a narcotic drug, see La.R.S. 40:961(23) and R.S. 40:964 Schedule II(A)(1)(1), and the proper sentencing provision for Dilaudid is La.R.S. 40:967(B)(1). We note that our decision in this matter differs from that reached in State v. Jenkins, 573 So.2d 218 (La.App. 5 Cir.1990) and the footnote in State v. Cutrera, 558 So.2d 611 (La.App. 1 Cir.1990). We respectfully disagree with those decisions.