Case ID: f-appx_420/html/0348-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David LYND, Plaintiff-Appellant v. McDONALD’S CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 10-10503
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    March 25, 2011.
    David Lynd, Mesquite, TX, pro se.
    John J. Little, Esq., Little Pedersen Fankhauser, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, David S. Foster, Latham & Watkins, L.L.P., Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.
    
      Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM

David Lynd moves this court for authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this appeal from the denial of his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. Lynd asserts that he is impoverished, that his claims are valid, and that the magistrate judge was biased. These allegations are insufficient to show that Lynd will raise a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. See Carson v. Polley, 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir.1982). Consequently, his IFP motion is DENIED and this appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. All other outstanding motions are likewise DENIED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.