Case ID: f-appx_699/html/0629-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ismael MAYA-PIZANO, AKA Ismael Maya Pizano, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 17-10130
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted October 12, 2017  San Francisco, California
    Filed October 17, 2017
    Katherine Lydon, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USSAC—Office of the US Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Noa Eva Oren, FPDCA—Federal Public Defender’s Office (Sacramento) Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellant
    Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, REINHARDT, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
    
      
       The Honorable Kathleen M. O'Malley, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Ismael Maya-Pizano appealed the district court’s sentence prior to our decision in United States v. Martinez-Lopez, 864 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 2017). Maya-Pizano concedes that Martinez-Lopez forecloses his appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the sentence.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.