Case ID: misc_33/html/0766-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Benjamin Smusch, Respondent, v. Joseph Ravitch et al., Appellants.
    Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, fourth district, borough of Manhattan.
    Nicholas Aleinikoff, for appellants.
    Jacob Rieger, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The testimony in this case is insufficient to establish a conversion. The defendants did not exercise acts of dominion over the chattels in question to the exclusion of plaintiffs rights as owner, and judgment should have been awarded to the defendants.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.

Present: Beekmaw, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gormaw, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new- trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.