Case ID: so2d_458/html/0001-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re ESTATE OF Emma G.W. VOSBURGH, Deceased. William Reed VOSBURGH, Jr., Appellant, v. Lester George WARD, William Ward, and Harvey Schonbrun, as Administrator Ad Litem, Appellees.
    No. 83-2548.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 22, 1984.
    Rehearing Denied Sept. 19, 1984.
    Susan Vernon Mikul of Albury, Morgan & Hendrick, P.A., Key West, for appellant.
    H. Eugene Johnson, Tampa, for appel-lees Lester George Ward and William Ward.
    Harvey Schonbrun of Harvey Schonbrun, P.A., Tampa, for appellee Harvey Schon-brun, as Adm’r Ad Litem.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

OTT, C.J., and GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Appellant incorrectly suggests in his motion for rehearing that this court held that a will could not be set aside on the basis of a nonbeneficiary’s exercise of undue influence. Rather, the rationale for our affirmance was based on a determination that appellant’s bare allegations of undue influence by a nonbeneficiary were insufficient to state grounds for relief.

Accordingly, appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.