Case ID: ad2d_202/html/1066-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Donald R. Barrett, Respondent, v Diane P. Barrett, Appellant.
    [608 NYS2d 971]
   —Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Suffolk County Family Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: The Hearing Examiner failed to set forth the factors it considered when it found that respondent’s pro-rata share of the basic child support obligation is unjust or inappropriate (see, Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [g]). Consideration of those factors is mandatory and nonwaivable (Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [g]). We remit the matter, therefore, for findings in accordance with Family Court Act § 413 (1) (g) and a de novo hearing.

We have considered respondent’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Order of Suffolk County Family Court, Abrams, J. — Child Support.) Present— Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.