Case ID: ny_192/html/0551-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles E. Rose, Respondent, v. The City of Troy, Appellant.
    
      Rose v. City of Troy, 119 App. Div. 927, affirmed.
    (Argued April 15, 1908;
    decided May 19, 1908.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 10, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have occurred through defendant’s negligence in permitting an obstruction to remain in a public street.
    
      P. H. Russell and G. B. Wellington for appellant.
    
      Frank H. Deal and Thomas F. Powers for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur : Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.