Case ID: so2d_724/html/0117-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nacho MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 98-1277.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 12, 1998.
    Michael A. Catalano, for Appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Dominique T. Suite-Brown, Assistant Attorney General, for Appellee.
    BEFORE: NESBITT, GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Because the uneontroverted evidence showed that the defendant did not have the ability to pay the court-ordered restitution, the trial court erred by finding that the defendant had willfully violated his probation. Therefore, we reverse the order extending his probation. See Hewett v. State, 613 So.2d 1305 (Fla.1993); White v. State, 693 So.2d 119 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Laing v. State, 622 So.2d 560 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

Reversed.