Case ID: sw3d_510/html/0896-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ceral L. ROBINSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 104298
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    Filed: February 21, 2017
    Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, For Movant/Appellant
    Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, For Respondent/Respondent
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ceral L. Robinson appeals from the motion court’s denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b). 
      
      . All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2013, unless otherwise indicated.