Case ID: njl_64/html/0726-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BERIAH MATHIS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. SAMUEL B. ROSE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    Argued March 14, 1900
    Decided June 18, 1900.
    On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Su-preme Court, see antep. 45.
    For the plaintiff in error, Clarence L. Cole.
    
    For the defendant in error, Robert H. Ingersoll.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the-reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Van Syckel.

For affirmance — Depue (Chief Justice), Gummere,. Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Vre-

DENBURGH, VOORHEES. 9.

For' reversal—None.