Case ID: f-appx_367/html/0464-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jason Allen WOODY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-8210.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 18, 2010.
    Decided: Feb. 26, 2010.
    Jason Allen Woody, Appellant Pro Se. John Lanier File, John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jason Allen Woody appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his § 3582(c) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of the district court’s discretion. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004) (standard). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Woody, No. 5:06-cr-00040-1 (S.D.W.Va. Nov. 17, 2009; Dec. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.