Case ID: ny-super-ct_51/html/0535-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael Feely, respondent, v. The Manhattan Ry. Co. et al., appellants.
    Decided December 1, 1884.
    Appeal from order directing bill of particulars. Action for alleged damages to premises in Division street, in the city of New York, arising from the construction and operation of the elevated railroad there. The defendant, The Manhattan Railway Company, was ordered to serve a bill of particulars respecting the tenth defense, as follows : “ This defendant alleges that the plaintiff is barred by his own negligence, acquiescence and the lapse of time for maintaining this action.’
    Deyo, Duer & Bauerdorf, for appellant.
    Roger Foster, for respondent.
    Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., Van Vorst and Freedman, JJ.
   Per Curiam.

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.