Case ID: so2d_216/html/0037-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ralph MELORO, Appellant, v. Samuel SMITH, Appellee.
    No. 67-1033.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    Dec. 3, 1968.
    Max B. Kogen, Miami, for appellant.
    Dunn & Johnson and Thomas A. Horkan, Jr., Miami, for appellee.
    Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We have fully considered appellant’s points on appeal and have concluded that the trial court was correct in holding that service of process was lawfully made and that the court obtained jurisdiction of the defendant. See: Lienard v. DeWitt, Fla.1963, 153 So.2d 302; L. P. Evans Motors, Inc. v. Meyer, Fla.App.1960, 119 So.2d 301.

No harmful error having been made to appear, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.