Case ID: f-appx_269/html/0685-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Francois P. GIVENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 06-16267.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 31, 2007 .
    Filed March 10, 2008.
    Francois P. Givens, Norco, CA, pro se.
    Before: SKOPIL, FERGUSON, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Francois Givens, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action on statute of limitations grounds. Because the district court dismissed the complaint on initial screening, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, without leave to amend, Givens had no opportunity to argue that the statute of limitations should have been equitably tolled. See Cervantes v. City of San Diego, 5 F.3d 1273, 1276-77 (9th Cir.1993) (noting dismissal on statute of limitations grounds is disfavored where matters outside the complaint are not considered and where equitable tolling may apply). We vacate and remand for the district court to determine in the first instance whether equitable tolling applies to the circumstance of this ease.

VACATED and REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.