Case ID: conn_247/html/0915-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BERDON, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DANTE BOND
    
      Glenn W. Falk, special public defender, in support of the petition.
    
      Linda N. Howe, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided September 29, 1998
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 183 (AC 16306), is denied.

BERDON, J.,

dissenting. I would grant the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal on the following issues:

“ 1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s comment about the existence of a criminal conspiracy, made during its jury instruction on accomplice testimony, only implicated general principles of credibility and, therefore, did not merit review under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 567 A.2d 823 (1989)?

“2. If review is warranted, did the trial court’s comment deprive the defendant of a fair trial?”