Case ID: sw2d_817/html/0569-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "ORDER PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Harold THURSTON, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. 59142.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Aug. 20, 1991.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 23, 1991.
    Application to Transfer Denied Nov. 19, 1991.
    
      Kenneth A. Seufert, Farmington, for defendant, appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., John P. Pollard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff, respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of armed robbery in the first degree, armed criminal action, and assault in the second degree. He appeals; we affirm. The judgments are based upon findings of facts that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).