Case ID: f-appx_697/html/0217-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Starsha M. SEWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 17-1632
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: September 14, 2017
    Decided: September 19, 2017
    Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Gerard J. Stief, Associate General Counsel, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court’s orders dismissing this action alleging discrimination in employment and a conspiracy concerning child custody and denying her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth., No. 8:16-cv-02456-GJH (D. Md. July 19 & Aug. 29, 2016; Mar. 13 & Apr. 28, 2017). We deny the motion for initial hearing en banc and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED