Case ID: so2d_427/html/0335-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ADRIAN INVESTMENT CORPORATION and Pedro Adrian, Appellants, v. Antonio JACOMINO and Eugenio Sanson, Appellees.
    No. 82-1308.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 1, 1983.
    Nestor Morales, Miami, for appellants.
    Fine, Jacobson, Block, Klein, Colan & Simon and Joseph H. Serota, Miami, for ap-pellees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and BASKIN, JJ. -
   SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The summary judgment entered below on the appellants’ cross-claim for payment of any brokerage commission which might be recovered against them by the plaintiff in the main action is reversed because the record demonstrates that there is a genuine issue as to whether the appellants agreed to purchase the property in question in reliance upon representations of an agent of the appellees-cross-defendants that he alone, and thus not the plaintiff-broker, was involved in the transaction. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); see Joiner v. McCullers, 158 Fla. 562, 28 So.2d 823 (1947); Watson v. Jones, 41 Fla. 241, 25 So. 678 (1899).