Case ID: ohio-st-3d_99/html/1541-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

2003-0886.
    Franklin v. Am. Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co.
   Cuyahoga App. No. 81197, 2003-0hio-1340. Discretionary appeal allowed on Propositions of Law Nos. I, III, and IV.

Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J.,

concur but would allow Propositions of Law No. I and II and hold for the decision in 2002-1245 and 2002-1271, Estate of Houser v. Motorists Ins. Co., Auglaize App. No. 2-02-02, 2002-Ohio-2845; would allow Proposition of Law No. Ill and hold for the decision in 2002-0932, Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, Summit App. No. 20784, 2002-0hio-1502; and would allow Proposition of Law No. IV and hold for the decision in 2002-1956, Tucker v. Wilson, Clermont App. No. CA2002-01-002, 2002-0hio-5142.

Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs but would allow all propositions of law without holding.

O’Donnell, J., concurs but would allow Propositions of Law Nos. I and III and hold for the decision in Galatis; and would allow Proposition of Law No. IV and hold for the decision in Tucker.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.