Case ID: f-appx_31/html/0286-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Regina VENGOECHEA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-6120.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted March 14, 2002.
    Decided March 28, 2002.
    
      Regina Vengoechea, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Office of the United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Regina Vengoechea appeals from the district court’s order giving her notice, under Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir.1975), that the Government had moved to summarily dismiss her motion for a reduction of sentence. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order giving Vengoechea Roseboro notice is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.