Case ID: f-appx_615/html/0799-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Milford WASHINGTON, a/k/a Tessuma Nuballa, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael R. REED; Patrick Gurney; Louis Cei; Daniel Mahon; David Robinson; Ms. Taylor; Ms. Best, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 14-7760.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 9, 2015.
    Decided: Sept. 11, 2015.
    Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Milford Washington seeks to appeal the district court’s order ruling on several discovery and miscellaneous motions, and has filed a motion to remand. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Washington seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an ap-pealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny the motion to remand and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.