Case ID: f2d_15/html/1019-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles SIDOTE, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
    December 7, 1926.)
    No. 4676.
    In terror to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio; Paul Jones, Judge.
    Henry A. Pollack, of Cleveland, Ohio (Mooney, McCormack, Roth & Pollack, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for plaintiff in error.
    Mr. John B. Osmun, Asst. U. S. A.tty., of Cleveland, Ohio (A. E. Bemsteen, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for the United States.
    Before DENISON and MOORMAN, Circuit Judges, and HOUGH, District Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The counts for possession and sale were supported by substantial evidence; and the single sentence was permissible under these counts without reference to the nuisance count.