Case ID: so2d_412/html/0057-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William ARRINGTON and Edith Arwood Arrington, his wife, Appellants, v. CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Beane Exterminating Company, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Smith Cameron, Appellees.
    No. 81-439.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    April 7, 1982.
    Robert V. Romani of Farish, Farish & Romani, West Palm Beach, for appellants.
    Christopher R. Fertig of Fertig & Curtis, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and David Wm. Boone of Law Offices of David Wm. Boone, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellants, plaintiffs in the court below, seek reversal of a judgment based upon an adverse jury verdict for defendant-appellants.

We have carefully considered appellants’ contention that the trial court erred in refusing to grant appellants a new trial because the verdict was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. Unquestionably the verdict surprised appellants arid the trial judge. Nevertheless, the trial judge felt, and we agree, that the issue was one for the jury’s determination.

Accordingly, we find no demonstration of reversible error and affirm the judgment appealed from.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY and HERSEY, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.