Case ID: f-appx_381/html/0097-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John P. FALTINGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF RHI-NEBECK, NY, Chief of Police Richard Cunningham, Sergeant Peter Dunn, Police Officer J. Kelly, Carr Property Management Co., Christopher Carr, Barbara Jeek, Linda Miele-Cavallaro, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 09-4226-cv.
    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    June 22, 2010.
    John P. Faltings, Rhinebeck, NY, pro se.
    David L. Posner, McCabe & Mack LLP, Poughkeepsie, NY; Andrew L. Zwerling, Garfunkel Wild, P.C., Great Neck, NY, for Appellees.
    PRESENT: DENNIS JACOBS, Chief Judge, AMALYA L. KEARSE and PIERRE N. LEVAL, Circuit Judges.
   SUMMARY ORDER

John Faltings, pro se, appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), a district court “shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that ... the action ... fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). This Court “review[s] de novo a district court’s ruling pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.” Polanco v. Hopkins, 510 F.3d 152, 155 (2d Cir.2007).

Having conducted a de novo review of the record, we affirm the district court’s judgment for substantially the same reasons stated by the district court in its thorough order of dismissal. See generally Harrington v. County of Suffolk, 607 F.3d 31 (2d Cir.2010). We have considered all of Faltings’s arguments on appeal and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.