Case ID: ala-app_23/html/0686-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "RICE, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(119 So. 927)
    Hiram WEAVER v. STATE.
    (6 Div. 418.)
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    Jan. 22, 1929.
    J. J. Curtis, of Jasper, for 'appellant.
    Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.
   RICE, J.

The court has read and considered the entire evidence in this case, sitting en bane. We have reached the conclusion that it tends in no legal way to connect the defendant (appellant) with the possession of the still, etc., which was found. The general affirmative charge in his favor, which he requested, should therefore have been given, and for the error in its refusal the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.