Case ID: f-appx_19/html/0054-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Lawrence E. BOWLING, Petitioner.
    No. 01-1957.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 6, 2001.
    Decided Sept. 11, 2001.
    Lawrence E. Bowling, petitioner pro se.
    Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Lawrence E. Bowling petitions this court for a writ of mandamus directing the district judge to disqualify himself and proceed no further in No. CA-01^6-2, currently pending in the Southern District of West Virginia. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary situations. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976). A judge’s involvement in prior proceedings involving the petitioner ordinarily is not cause for granting the writ. Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 551, 114 S.Ct. 1147, 127 L.Ed.2d 474 (1994); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir.1987). Here, we discern no grounds for granting the requested relief. We therefore deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.