Case ID: f-appx_97/html/0778-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

P.F. LAZOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Scott PATTERSON; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 03-55540.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted May 10, 2004.
    
    Decided May 19, 2004.
    P.F. Lazor, Lancaster, CA, pro se.
    Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

P.F. Lazor, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials violated his constitutional rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir.2002). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Lazor’s action pursuant to section 1915(g) because the record shows that Lazor has, on three or more prior occasions, brought an action that was dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Lazor’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.