Case ID: pa-super_220/html/0414-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Hoffman, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ballariel v. Hoagerhyde, Appellant.
    Argued November 10, 1971.
    Before Weight, P. J., Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoeeman, and Cer-oone, JJ. (Spaulding, J., absent).
    
      
      Cosmos J. Reale, for appellant.
    
      Jon L. Friedman, with him Friedman, Friedman and Weisman, for appellee.
    March 24, 1972:
   Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

This appeal presents the same question which was decided by our Court in Szarmack v. Welch, 220 Pa. Superior Ct. 407, 289 A. 2d 149 (1972). For the reasons given in Szarmack, we hold that Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 4007(a) requires the disclosure of the existence and policy limits of liability insurance coverage.

The order of the court below is affirmed.