Case ID: sw3d_414/html/0051-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dominic MAXWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 99822.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Nov. 19, 2013.
    Dominic Maxwell, Jefferson City, MO, pro se.
    Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dominic Maxwell appeals the denial of his motion requesting a hearing to establish his reason for the untimely filing of his Rule 29.15 motion. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).