Case ID: ohio-st-3d_82/html/1421-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

97-2419.
    State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. Sheward.
   In Prohibition and Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of prohibition and mandamus. On May 20,1998, respondents filed a motion to strike portions of relators’ reply brief. Whereas it is determined by the court that respondents’ motion is, in substance, a responsive brief to relators’ reply brief; and, whereas S.Ct-Prac.R. VI does not provide for further briefing in response to a reply brief; and, whereas the filing of a brief after the deadlines imposed by S.Ct.Prac.R. VI is prohibited by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua apunte, that respondents’ motion to strike be, and hereby is, stricken.