Case ID: mo_38/html/0357-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Holmes, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William A. Eads, Plaintiff in Error, v. Frederick Vollmer, Defendant in Error.
    Practice— Snpreme Courts — The record not containing a copy of the petition and answer, and being so defective that the court cannot determine whether there be error or no, judgment affirmed.
    
      Error to Gasconade Circuit.
    
    
      T. H. Russell, for plaintiff in error.
    Belch, for defendant in error.
   Holmes, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case the record is so incomplete that we cannot see with any certainty whether there was error in the judgment or not. There is no petition, or complaint, or answer. We are left to gather from the evidence presented in the bill of exceptions what the case was that was before the court.

The plaintiff in error failing to show to this court that any error has been committed, the judgment will be affirmed.

Judge Wagner concurs; Judge Lovelace absent.