Case ID: so3d_25/html/1283-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Terrance AIKENS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D08-2815.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Jan. 27, 2010.
    Clayton R. Kaeiser, Miami, for appellant.
    Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Rolando A. Soler, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before RAMIREZ, C.J., and CORTIÑAS, J. and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

The claim was time-barred, see Hughes v. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). In addition, under the facts of this case, the erroneous use of “and/or” in the jury instruction did not constitute fundamental error, see Garzon v. State, 980 So.2d 1038 (Fla.2008).