Case ID: f-appx_674/html/0956-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joshua Curtis CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-11543 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Filed (January 17, 2017)
    Adam W. Overstreet, Kenyen Ray Brown, Michele Carstens O’Brien, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Joshua Curtis Clark, Memphis, TN, for Defendant-Appellant
    Before MARTIN, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

William Hughes, appointed counsel for Joshua Clark in. this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Clark’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED,