Case ID: f-appx_602/html/0542-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Raheem MUHAMMAD, Appellant v. Kim DINE, United States Capitol Police, et al., Appellees.
    No. 14-5087.
    United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
    April 30, 2015.
    Raheem Muhammad, Washington, DC, pro se.
    R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellees.
    BEFORE: GRIFFITH, KAVANAUGH, and WILKINS , Circuit Judges.
    
      
       Judge Wilkins would remand the case for reconsideration of the dismissal of appellant's complaint and civil action in light of the statute of limitations concerns raised in appellant's motion concerning the filing date, granted in the dismissal order, and his filing of a motion to amend his original complaint. See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 672, 674 (D.C.Cir.2004).
    
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed March 26, 2014 be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing appellant’s complaint and civil action without prejudice for failure to comply with Fed. R.Civ.P. 8(a). See, e.g., Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.