Case ID: ny_216/html/0681-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ernest Werner et al., Doing Business under the Firm Name of Werner & Brown, Respondents, v. Ruth N. Heinze, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.
    
      Werner v. Heinze, 158 App. Div. 933, affirmed.
    (Submitted October 18, 1915;
    decided November 16, 1915.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered October 29, 1913, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict directed by the court in an action upon a promissory note and a dismissal of a counterclaim for money alleged to be due defendant appellant by reason of the wrongful sale by plaintiffs of certain convertible bonds purchased by them for defendant appellant’s account.
    
      Ferdinand E. M. Bullowa and Emilie M. Bullowa for appellant.
    
      Benjamin G. Paskus and Norman P. S. Schloss for respondents.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Collin, Hogan, Cardozo, Seabury and Pound, JJ.