Case ID: so2d_579/html/0891-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marilin LARKEN and Marcelo Larken, Appellants, v. BARNETT BANK OF SOUTH FLORIDA, N.A., etc., Appellee.
    No. 90-1571.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 28, 1991.
    Marilin Larken and Marcelo Larken, in pro. per.
    Kris E. Penzell, Miami, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and NESBITT, JJ.
   CORRECTED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The Larkens appeal from a final summary judgment in an action for default on a promissory note.

We affirm the order of final summary judgment. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966). However, we reverse that portion of the order awarding attorneys’ fees to the appellee and remand to the trial court with directions to comply with the requirements of Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.