Case ID: f2d_931/html/0291-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROHNER GEHRIG COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TRI-STATE MOTOR TRANSIT, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 89-6246.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    April 29, 1991.
    Stuart W. Lapp, Chris C. Pappas, Dunn, Kacal, Adams, Pappas & Law, Houston, Tex., and Thomas V. Bender, Kyle E. Krull, Linde Thomsom Langworthy Kohn & Van Dyke, P.C., Kansas City, Mo., for defendant-appellant.
    
      A. Douglas Shackelford, Jr., Billings & Solomon, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appel-lee.
   On Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc.

(Opinion February 15, 1991, 5 Cir., 1991, 923 F.2d 1118).

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.