Case ID: alaska-fed_4/html/0734-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

255 F. 992
    SMITH v. UNITED STATES.
    No. 3264.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Feb. 3, 1919.
    R. F. Roth, U. S. Atty., and Harry E. Pratt, Asst. U. S. Atty, both of Fairbanks, Alaska, and Annette Abbott Adams, U. S. Atty., of San Francisco, Cal.
   PER CURIAM.

Motion for dismissal of writ of error for noncompliance by the plaintiff in error with the provisions of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the Rules of Practice of this court (208 Fed. ix, 124 C.C.A. ix) granted, and writ of error dismissed.