Case ID: f-appx_697/html/0203-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN RE: Giuseppe PILEGGI, Petitioner.
    No. 17-1676
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: September 7, 2017
    Decided: September 14, 2017
    Giuseppe Pileggi, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Giuseppe Pileggi petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in acting on his Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g) motion and 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied Pileggi’s Rule 41(g) motion without prejudice by order entered July 26, 2017, and dismissed his § 2266 motion by order entered September 1, 2017. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Pileggi’s motions, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED