Case ID: nj_51/html/0025-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THOMAS McKINLAY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued December 18,1967
    Decided January 4,1968.
    
      Mr. Sidney B. Kaufman for appellant (Messrs. Sheldon & Kaufman, attorneys).
    
      Mr. David J. Hughes for respondent (Mr. Leo Kaplowitz, attorney).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, 98 N. J. Super. 280, 237 A. 2d 274.

For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Prancis, Proctor, Goldmann, Schettino and Haneman—7.

For reversal—None.