Case ID: misc_197/html/0384-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Albert Reizen, Doing Business as Inter County Painting Company, Respondent, v. Max Pardes, Doing Business as Crown Paint & Wallpaper Company, Defendant.  Max Pardes, Doing Business as Crown Paint & Wallpaper Company, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Isador Nudelman, Doing Business as Liberty Paint Supply Company, Third-Party Defendant. * Isador Nudelman, Doing Business at Liberty Paint Supply Company, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. United States Gypsum Company, Third-Party Defendant, Appellant. *
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    March 23, 1950.
    
      James Bruce and A. Hayne de Tampert for appellant.
    
      Leon E. Borden and Hyman Stein for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The second third-party defendant having raised issues by its denial of the allegations of the main complaint, is, within the purview of section 288 of the Civil Practice Act to be deemed a party subject to examination before trial by plaintiff.

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs.

Steinbrink, Rubenstein and Golden, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, etc.