Case ID: nj-misc_9/html/1206-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Ctjeiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STRAUSS EQUIPMENT COMPANY AND SYDNEY PERKINS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. CHARLES WILSON AND ABE NELSON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
    Submitted October 16, 1931
    Decided November 23, 1931.
    Before Justices Campbell, Lloyd and Bodine.
    Eor the defendant-appellant Charles Wilson, Maurice J.. McKeown.
    
    Eor the plaintiffs-appellees, Mantel & Kaplon.
    
   Pee Ctjeiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the Elizabeth District Court. The trial judge sitting without a jury found that the damages for which the plaintiff' sought recovery were caused by the negligent operation of the-defendant’s car by the defendant’s agent.

The proofs set forth in the settled state of the ease indicate-not only that there was adequate proof to support the findings of negligence but also agency.

The judgment will therefore he affirmed, with costs.