Case ID: nj_53/html/0248-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Ctjeiam :", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued January 7, 1969
    Decided February 3, 1969.
    
      
      Mr. James Hunter, III argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Archer, Greiner, Hunter & Read, attorneys; Mr. Charles Lee Harp, Jr., on the brief).
    
      Mr. Joseph A. Hoffman, Eirst Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Stephen Slcillman. Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).
   Pee Ctjeiam :

Subsequent to the entry of the orders appealed from, the defendant brought itself into sufficient compliance. Despite this, the plaintiff presses its contention that the orders were valid when made and were properly upheld in the Appellate Division, and that the defendant's appeal should therefore now be rejected. We agree and affirm for the reasons expressed by Judge Goldmann in his comprehensive opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 100 N. J. Super. 366 (App. Div. 1968).

Affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintkaub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Hall and Schettino — 5.

For reversal — None.