Case ID: sw3d_299/html/0032-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Timothy and Catherine BAUER, Appellants, v. OMR CORPORATION, Respondent.
    No. ED 92384.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Nov. 17, 2009.
    Rehearing Denied Dec. 17, 2009.
    Timothy Bauer, St. Louis, MO, pro se.
    Matthew J. Sauter, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE BAKER, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Timothy and Catherine Bauer (Plaintiffs) appeal pro se the trial court’s judgment denying them motion to disqualify the trial judge, Hon. David L. Dowd, and dismissing their petition against OMR Corporation (Respondent).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).