Case ID: ohio-st-3d_84/html/0214-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Gray, Appellee.
    [Cite as State v. Gray (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 214.]
    (No. 98-2159
    Submitted November 10, 1998
    Decided December 30, 1998.)
    
      Mark E. Mulligan, Ottawa County Prosecuting Attorney, and Paul Skaff, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
   The certification of conflict by the Court of Appeals for Ottawa County is accepted.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

The trial court’s finding that Daniel Gray is a sexual predator is reinstated.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Resnick, J., not participating.