Case ID: sw3d_516/html/0427-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DISALVO PROPERTIES, LLC, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Deborah B. PURVIS; Elizabeth E. Nolan; NIS Construction Services, LLC; and Jennings Station Crossing, LLC, Defendants, and Gary L. Hall; Bentley Investments of Nevada, LLC; and Penfields Business Centers, LLC, Defendants/Respondents.
    No. ED 105062
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    Filed: April 18, 2017
    Steven W. Koslovsky, Clayton, MO, for PlaintiffAppellant
    William M. Modrcin, Overland Park, KS, for Defendants/Respondents
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

DiSalvo Properties, LLC appeals from the trial court’s summary judgment entered in favor of Gary L. Hall; Bentley Investments of Nevada, LLC; and Pen-fields Business Centers, LLC (Respondents). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude Respondents are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on material facts to which there is no genuine dispute. ITT Commercial Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).