Case ID: so2d_781/html/1148-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Conrad LOWMAN, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D00-544.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    March 15, 2001.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Robert Friedman, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Edward C. Hill, Jr., and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm all issues. In regard to appellant’s specific claim that section 893.13(l)(e), Florida Statutes (1997), is unconstitutionally vague and denies equal protection of the law, we note that this court recently rejected a similar challenge to the statute in State v. McClellan, 765 So.2d 807 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, WEBSTER and LEWIS, JJ., concur.