Case ID: nev_90/html/0415-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOAN RAISHBROOK, Appellant, v. THE ESTATE OF JUDITH F. BAYLEY, Deceased, Respondent.
    No. 7471
    December 11, 1974
    528 P.2d 1331
    
      Wiener, Goldwater, Galatz & Waldman, Ltd., of Las Vegas, for Appellant.
    
      Foley Brothers and Lionel Sawyer Collins & Wartman, of Las Vegas, for Respondent.
   OPINION

Per Curiam:

Because the record on appeal contains neither a transcript nor any statement of the evidence adduced in the court below, which we deem essential to determination of contentions presented to us, the order appealed from is affirmed. When evidence on which a district court’s judgment rests is not properly included in the record on appeal, it is assumed that the record supports the lower court’s findings. NRAP 10; City of Las Vegas v. Bolden, 89 Nev. 526, 516 P.2d 110 (1973); Meakin v. Meakin, 88 Nev. 25, 492 P.2d 1304 (1972); Leeming v. Leeming, 87 Nev. 530, 490 P.2d 342 (1971); Pfister v. Shelton, 69 Nev. 309, 250 P.2d 239 (1952). 
      
      Appellant’s present counsel were substituted for prior counsel, to argue this appeal, after the time for docketing the record had passed.