Case ID: f-appx_128/html/0095-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

POWERSPORTS, INC., a Florida corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROYAL SUNALLIANCE INSURANCE CO, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 04-11308.
    D.C. Docket No. 03-80238-CV-KLR.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    April 29, 2005.
    Charles M. Auslander, Greenberg Trau-rig, P.A., Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Thomas M. Spitaletto, Douglas R. Noah, Jr., Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, Dallas, TX, James Miller Kaplan, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appel-lee.
    Before BLACK, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See 11th Cir. R. 36-1. 
      
      . 11th Cir. R. 36-1 provides:
      When the court determines that any of the following circumstances exist:
      (a) judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous;
      (b) the evidence in support of a jury verdict is sufficient;
      (c) the order of an administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole;
      
        (d) summary judgment, directed verdict, or judgment on the pleadings is supported by the record;
      (e) judgment has been entered without a reversible error of law; and an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment or order may be affirmed or enforced without opinion.