Case ID: nj-eq_64/html/0791-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the matter of the probate of the will of George H. Sickles, deceased.
    [Filed November 17th, 1902.]
    On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Ordinary Reed, whose opinion is reported in 18 Dick. Ch. Rep. 233.
    
    
      Mr. Edward Q. Kcasbey, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Louis Hood, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given in the prerogative court.

For affirmance—The Ci-tiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Port, I-Ienwriokson, Pitney, Bogert, Voorhees, Vroom—8.

For reversal—Dixon, Collins, Garretson, Adams, Vredenburgh—5.