Case ID: so2d_686/html/0017-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Miriam ALAMO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 96-00127.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 26, 1996.
   PER CURIAM.

Miriam Alamo challenges the denial of her motion to correct illegal sentence brought under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), alleging she is entitled to credit pursuant to State v. Green, 547 So.2d 925 (Fla.1989). The trial court denied the motion without attaching any documentation which would refute the issue raised by Alamo.

Accordingly we reverse. On remand, should the trial court again deny the motion, it must attach portions of the record which refute Alamo’s claim. See Becton v. State, 668 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Reversed and remanded.

RYDER, A.C.J., and BLUE and QUINCE, JJ., concur.