Case ID: pa_295/html/0099-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Garland, Appellant, v. Gordon.
    
      January 7, 1929:
    Argued December 3, 1928.
    Before Moschzisker, C. J., Frazer, Walling, Simpson, Kephart, Sadler and Schaffer, JJ.
    
      W. A. Griffith, of Griffith, Truxall & Pruger, for appellant.
    
      George H. Calvert, of Galvert, Thompson & Berger and Robert J. Dodds, of Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, for appellee, were not heard.
   Per Curiam,

In its opinion granting a new trial, the court below stated: “We have reviewed and carefully considered all evidence and are of opinion that a just disposition of the case requires that it be retried.” In Fertax Co. v. Spiegelman, 292 Pa. 139, 140, we very recently said that, where a trial court states in its opinion that “the interests of right and justice require that the case shall be retried......we do not interfere on appeal”; that authority rules this case.

The order appealed from is affirmed.