Case ID: ala-app_21/html/0692-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(110 So. 925)
    Jim RYALS and Dib Ryals v. STATE.
    (4 Div. 198.)
    (Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    Dec. 14, 1926.)
    Appeal from Circuit Court, Crenshaw County; A. E. Gamble, Judge.
    Frank B. Bricken, of Luverne, for appellants. Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Robt. G. Tate, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   PER CURIAM.

The court has read the evidence in this case en banc, and we are of the opinion that the saíne fails to identify the car found in the possession of the defendants as the car alleged to have been stolen. It follows that the general affirmative charge, requested by appellants, should have been given, and for the error in its refusal the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.