Case ID: so2d_578/html/0900-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Wilfred ZAHORANSKI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 90-1680.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 8, 1991.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Mallorye Cunningham, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    No appearance for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence but remand the case to the trial court for the limited purpose of entry of an amended judgment which reflects that appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere rather than a plea of guilty; and entry of an amended order of revocation which reflects the trial court’s determination that appellant violated his probation only by violating condition (3) thereof, rather than the several violations erroneously contained therein.

ANSTEAD, STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.