Case ID: a2d_982/html/0061-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Cleveland LOFTON, Petitioner.
    No. 102 EM 2009.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Sept. 3, 2009.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 2009, the Application for Leave to File Oi'iginal Process, the Petition for Writ of Prohibition, and the Application for an Immediate Hearing are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation improper). The Prothonotary is directed to forward these filings to counsel of record. See CP-51-CR-0006383-2007 and CP-51CR-0006399-2007.