Case ID: nj-eq_73/html/0738-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary E. Schlicher and William Schlicher, appellants, v. Charles H. Keeler et al., respondents.
    [Argued December 6th, 1907.
    Decided March 2d, 1908.]
    On appeal from a decree of the former chancellor advised by Vice-Chancellor Bergen, whose opinion is reported in 62 Atl. Rep. A
    
      Mr. Alan II. Strong, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. Charles C. Rommann, for the respondents, George W. Keeler and wife.
    
      Mr. John V. B. Wicoff, for the respondent, Charles Keeler.
   Per Curiam.

The decree under review herein will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Bergen in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenohard, Bogert, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill — 11.

For reversal — None.