Case ID: so2d_501/html/0728-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BARFIELD, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CALIFORNIA CHEMICAL COMPANY, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD, Appellee.
    No. BN-475.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Jan. 29, 1987.
    Rehearing Denied Feb. 23, 1987.
    
      Terrence F. Lenick of Allen, Knudsen, Swartz, DeBoest, Rhoads & Edwards, Fort Myers, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Clark R. Jennings, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept, of Legal Affairs, Tallahassee, for appellee.
   BARFIELD, Judge.

California Chemical Company’s procedure for the chemical treatment of residential swimming pools through a technique involving the direct infusion of chlorine gas from a portable tank through a diffusion “wand” into the swimming pool water does not require that appellant be licensed under section 489.105(3), Florida Statutes (1985).

REVERSED.

SMITH, and JOANOS, JJ., concur.