Case ID: iowa_90/html/0764-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Given, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frank T. Campbell, Spencer Smith and Peter A. Dey, Railroad Commissioners In and For the State of Iowa, v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, Appellant.
    Action to compel conformity to maximum rate schedule: second appeal, 53 N. W. Rep. 351, followed.
    
    
      Appeal from Dyon District Court. — Hon. George W. Wakefield, Judge.
    Tuesday, May 8, 1894.
    Action in equity to compel the defendant to conform its charges to the schedule of maximum rates made by the board of railway commissioners, and applicable to its road. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.
    
    Affitrmed.
    
      John W. Cary and George D. Clarice for appellant.
    
      John T. Stone, Attorney General, and H. G. McMillan, County Attorney, for appellees.
   Given, J.

This case was before this court on a former appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment dismissing their petition, the case having been submitted below on the pleadings and on an agreed statement of facts. See 53 N. W. Rep. 351. Said judgment being reversed, and the ease remanded, it was again submitted on the same pleadings and agreed statement of facts, and judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, from which defendant prosecutes this appeal. The case is now before us upon the same abstract and arguments as on the former submission, and no other or different questions are presented. A careful review of those questions fails to discover to us any reason for changing the conclusions announced in the former opinion, and, the judgment now appealed from being in harmony with that opinion, it is affirmed.