Case ID: nj-eq_121/html/0250-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary A. Daly, complainant-respondent, v. Ripley Watson, defendant-appellant.
    [Submitted October term, 1936.
    Decided January 26th, 1937.]
    
      Messrs. Herr & Xaufmann (Mr. Dougal Herr, Mr. William A. Xaufmann and Mr. Emerson A. Tschupp), for the defendant-appellant.
    
      Mr. I. Edward Herrmann and Mr. Ralph W. Emerson, for the complainant-respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We have examined the proofs in this case, and they abundantly support the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor.

The decree will be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.