Case ID: ny-2d_62/html/0690-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Betty O. Muka, Appellant, v Hancock, Estabrook, Ryan, Shove & Hust et al., Respondents.
    Submitted March 26, 1984;
    decided May 1, 1984
   Motion to dismiss appeal granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and $20 costs of motion, upon the grounds that a direct appeal does not lie where questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (CPLR 5601, subd [b], par 2) and where the constitutional questions involved are not substantial, and upon the further ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon appellant’s default (CPLR 5511).