Case ID: sw3d_326/html/0827-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOHN BEAL, INC., Respondent, v. Carmen HILL, Defendant, and Jon E. Fuhrer, Co., et al., Appellants.
    No. ED 94660.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Dec. 7, 2010.
    
      Randall Gusdorf, Saint Louis, MO, for Respondent.
    David M. Hocking, Esq., Saint Louis, MO, for Defendants/Appellants.
    Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jon E. Führer, Co., Alternative Funding, LLC, Danyielle Burks, and Sean Bu-channon appeal the trial court’s judgment in favor of John Beal, Inc. (“Beal”) on his petition to enforce a mechanic’s liens. We find that the trial court did not err in its judgment in favor of Beal.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).