Case ID: sw2d_987/html/0531-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David RUEGGE, Claimant-Appellant-Cross Respondent, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Employer-Respondent-Cross Appellant, and Treasurer of Missouri, Respondent.
    Nos. 75051, 75059.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    March 23, 1999.
    Susan Kreher Roach, Chesterfield, for appellant.
    Robert M. Evans, Mary Anne Lindsey, Jeffrey Kent Elnicki, St. Louis, for respondents.
    Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, David W. Ruegge, appeals from a workers’ compensation award denying compensation issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. Employer, Chrysler Corporation, cross-appeals from an award of partial costs entered in its favor.

The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

We affirm the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(4). Chrysler’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal, or in the Alternative, to Strike the Appellant’s Brief is hereby denied.