Case ID: njl_113/html/0033-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JAMES GOODMAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. FRANK H. EGGERS, JUDGE, ETC., RESPONDENT.
    Submitted February 16, 1934
    — Decided May 4, 1934.
    For the appellants, Raslcin & Hornstein.
    
    For the respondent, James A. Hamill.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Hehee, Yan Buskirk, Heteield, Dear, Dill, JJ. 8.

For reversal — Parker, Lloyd, Perskie, Kays, Wells, JJ. 5.