Case ID: ohio-st-3d_92/html/0214-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Cook, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Heilman, f.k.a. Bellomy, Appellant, v. Progressive Insurance Company, Appellee, et al.
    [Cite as Heilman v. Progressive Ins. Co. (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 214.]
    (No. 00-2271
    Submitted May 16, 2001
    Decided July 5, 2001.)
   The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with our decisions in Littrell and Clark.

Elk & Elk Co., L.P.A., Bruce S. Rutsky and Todd O. Rosenberg, for appellant.

Eugene G. Gillis and Daniel D. Domozick, for appellee.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Cook, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent based on the reasoning set forth in my dissenting opinion in Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and in my opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part in Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.