Case ID: sw3d_58/html/0062-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James MING, Appellant/Plaintiff, v. Joseph H.D. LEE, Respondent/Defendant.
    No. ED 79124.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Oct. 9, 2001.
    Isidore I. Lamke, Washington, MO, for appellant.
    James Mondl & James Hacking, III St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, James Ming, appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant, Joseph H.D. Lee, in a breach of contract action.

We have reviewed the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).