Case ID: ala-app_43/html/0709-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "CATES, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

185 So.2d 149
    Ex parte Troy INGRAM.
    3 Div. 213.
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    April 5, 1966.
    Troy Ingram, pro se.
    Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and David W. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   CATES, Judge.

The writ of habeas corpus is not the proper mode of presenting the questions incident to lack of counsel on arraignment.

Hence, the purported appeal from the Montgomery Circuit Court seeks review of a futile judicial labor.

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution in the Circuit Court.

Dismissed.