Case ID: so3d_184/html/1270-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "/s/ John L. Weimer /s/ Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana KNOLL, J., CLARK, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re CONFIDENTIAL PARTY.
    No. 2015-B-2319.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Feb. 26, 2016.
   ORDER

[ Considering the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline filed by respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,

IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline be and hereby is rejected pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20. '

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be remanded for consideration of the previously filed formal charges.

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, this 26th day of February, 2016.

FOR THE-COURT:

/s/ John L. Weimer /s/ Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

KNOLL, J., would conditionally reject ■ the consént discipline.

CLARK, J., would conditionally reject the consent discipline.

KNOLL, J.,

dissents.

|J would conditionally reject the consent discipline.

CLARK, J.

hi would conditionally reject the consent discipline.