Case ID: so2d_479/html/0796-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. WALDEN, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mort KORAN, Appellant, v. Leo G. HACKER and Lillian Hacker, jointly and individually, Appellees.
    No. 85-839.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Dec. 4, 1985.
    Arthur G. Meyerson of Law Offices of Arthur G. Meyerson, Tamarac, for appellant.
    Leonard Feiner of Law Offices of Maurice Berkowitz, Fort Lauderdale, for appel-lees.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY, J., concur.

WALDEN, J., dissents with opinion.

WALDEN, Judge,

dissenting:

In my opinion the aggrieved parties had an adequate remedy at law so as to make the equitable remedy of rescission inappropriate. Degge v. First State Bank of Eustis, 145 Fla. 438, 199 So. 564 (1941); Liza Danielle, Inc. v. Jamko, Inc., 408 So.2d 735 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Lake Tippecanoe Owners Association, Inc. v. National Lake Developments, Inc., 390 So.2d 185 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). Thus, I respectfully dissent.