Case ID: nj-eq_88/html/0596-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edna G. Irwin, petitioner-respondent, v. James W. Irwin, defendant-appellant.
    [Decided January 31st, 1918.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised bjr Vice-Chancellor Lewis, whose opinion is reported ante ¶. 189.
    
    
      Messrs. Mackay & Mackay, for the respondent.
    
      Messrs. Colby, Whiting & Moore, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below bjr Vice-Chancellor Lewis.

For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams — 11.

For reversal — None.