Case ID: nc_1/html/0161-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "JONES, J. \n      Doderidge, J. \n      Jones, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Palmer vs. Litherland.
    Trin. 2 Car.
   JONES, J.

When I was in the Common Bench, a question came before us, whether an administrator durante minore ætale, who wastes the goods, shall be charged after the infant comes of age. In 6 Rep. Packman’s case, it is agreed that he shall be charged without saying how; and afterwards in the Common Bench, that he shall be charged as executor de son tort.

Doderidge, J.

I deny this. For at all times he had a lawful power to administer.

Jones, J.

I think like my brother Doderidge. He ought to be charged on the special matter. Postea 267. Noy, 86. 6 Co. 18.