Case ID: nj-super_111/html/0549-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ONONDAGA TRUCK LEASE, INC., A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. VICTOR C. HOVELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND t/a CIRCLE SERVICE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
    Argued October 5, 1970
    Decided October 9, 1970.
    Before Judges Goldmann, Leonard and Mountain.
    
      Mr. Joseph J. Talafous argued the cause for appellant (Mr. George H. Schneider, on the brief).
   Eespondent did not file a brief.

Per Curiam.

We affirm for the reasons stated in the reported opinion of Judge Cozzi, 107 N. J. Super. 463. Since there is no proof that there was an indivisible contract between the parties covering services, repairs and materials furnished to all of the vehicles leased to Seaboard by plaintiff, we are not called upon to determine whether, had such been the ease, defendant would have been entitled to a lien on the specific vehicle seized for the entire amount of his bill for services rendered to all the Seaboard vehicles.