Case ID: ga_58/html/0605-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bleckley, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cox & Hill et al., plaintiffs in error, vs. William R. Phillips, Jr., et al., defendants in error.
    As a judgment, solemnly pronounced by a judge of the superior court, on a question within his jurisdiction, is presumptively correct, and as the doubts of this court should be given in favor of, and not against such judgment, and as the grant of the injunction was coupled with conditions calculated to secure the defendants in the bill against ultimate loss, the safer and better course, under the facts of this particular case, is not to interfere with the discretion exercised in granting the injunction. It is not clearly apparent that the discretion was abused.
   Bleckley, Judge.