Case ID: so3d_108/html/0608-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronald W. HENDRICKS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. SC10-1275.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Jan. 31, 2013.
    William J. Sheppard, Daniel Gray Thomas, Matthew R. Kachergus and Bryan Everett Demaggio of Sheppard, White, Thomas & Kachergus, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, for Petitioner.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, and Thomas Howland Duffy, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision in Hendricks v. State, 34 So.3d 819 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss the review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

POLSTON, C.J., and LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE and LABARGA, JJ., recused.