Case ID: f-appx_100/html/0207-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronald E. JARMUTH, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CHARLES SCHWAB AND COMPANY, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 04-1394.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted June 2, 2004.
    Decided June 16, 2004.
    Ronald E. Jarmuth, Appellant pro se. Thomas Ryan Goodwin, Goodwin & Goodwin, L.L.P., Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM.

Ronald E. Jarmuth appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Charles Schwab on his action filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jarmuth v. Charles Schwab & Co., No. CA-03-80-1 (N.D.W.Va. Mar. 3, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED