Case ID: njl_95/html/0265-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HARRY M. WILSON, RESPONDENT, v. DISTRICT COURT, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT MONMOUTH COUNTY, APPELLANT.
    Submitted July 5, 1920
    Decided October 15, 1920.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is re-23orted in 93 N. J. L. 103.
    
      For the respondent, Charles F. O'oolc.
    
    For the appellant., Lloyd C. Biddle.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. '' - ‘

For affirmance — The Chibe Justice, Swayze, TreN-CHARD, BERGEN, IÍALISCH, BLACK, KaTZENBACPI, Wl-IITE, HePPENI-IEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, AOKERSON, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.