Case ID: f2d_168/html/0521-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ARTON STUDIOS, Inc., Respondent.
    No. 9635.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
    Argued May 18, 1948.
    Decided June 8, 1948.
    Harvey Diamond, of Washington, D. C. (David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand Acting Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Owsley Vose, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for petitioner.
    Emil Goldhaber, of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent.
    Before BIGGS, McLAUGHLIN, and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

An examination of the record shows that there is ample evidence to support the findings of fact made by the National Labor Relations Board and that the Board’s conclusions of law are correct. Moreover, we can see no reason, in the light of all the circumstances, why the notice required by the Board’s order to be given by the employer to its employees is too harsh or is improper. A decree enforcing the order of the Board may be submitted.