Case ID: so3d_200/html/0157-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Leonardo PEREZ, Appellant, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, et al., Appellees.
    No. 5D15-1874.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    June 17, 2016.
    
      Leonardo Perez, Apopka, pro se.
    Susan B. Morrison and Lauren E. Wages, Law Office of Daniel C. Consueg-ra, P.L., Tampa, for Appellee, Federal National Mortgage Association.
    No Appearance for other Appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Heilman v. Fla. Dep’t of Revenue, 727 So.2d 958, 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (“[I]n cases involving multiple filings of removal petitions, a state court retains jurisdiction to act when the federal court subsequently denies a removal petition which is based on the same grounds as a previously denied removal petition.” (citing Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. Rub, 481 N.W.2d 451 (N.D.1992))).

TORPY, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.