Case ID: f-appx_56/html/0409-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Scott Lee DESHAW, Petitioner— Appellant, v. Terry STEWART, Respondent— Appellee.
    No. 02-15747.
    D.C. No. CV-01-00639-JAT.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 10, 2003.
    
    Decided Feb. 20, 2003.
    Before LEAVY, FERNANDEZ and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

State prisoner Scott Lee Deshaw appeals the district court’s denial of his federal habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We have jurisdiction over this timely filed appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2258(a). We review the district court’s denial of his petition de novo, and its factual findings for clear error. Killian v. Poole, 282 F.3d 1204, 1207 (9th Cir.2002). We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. The state court did not unreasonably apply federal law as established by the Supreme Court. See United States v. Robinson, 485 U.S. 25, 108 S.Ct. 864, 99 L.Ed.2d 23 (1988); United States v. Soulard, 730 F.2d 1292 (9th Cir.1984) (“A prosecutor may properly comment upon the defendant’s failure to present exculpatory evidence, so long as it is not phrased to call attention to the defendant’s own failure to testify.”).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.