Case ID: ohio-st-3d_93/html/0498-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Cook, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State ex rel. Routt, Appellee, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellant.
    [Cite as State ex rel. Routt v. Indus. Comm. (2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 498.]
    
      (No. 01-567
    Submitted September 18, 2001
    Decided October 31, 2001.)
    
      Philip J. Fulton & Associates and Jonathan H. Goodman, for appellee.
    
      Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Kimberly M. Connett, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.
   The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Cook, J., dissents.

Cook, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in the opinions of the appellate court’s dissenting judge and the magistrate.