Case ID: f-appx_585/html/0049-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anthony C. BARRETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 14-7250.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 16, 2014.
    Decided: Oct. 22, 2014.
    Anthony C. Barrett, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony C. Barrett appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his action filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barrett v. United States, No. 5:14-cv-00010-FPS-JSK, 2014 WL 4084187 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 19, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.