Case ID: a3d_212/html/0499-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edella JOHNSON (a/k/a Edella Robinson a/k/a Edella Robinson Johnson), Eric Johnson, Individually and on Behalf of other Similarly Situated Former and Current Homeowners in Pennsylvania, Petitioners v. PHELAN HALLINAN & SCHMIEG, LLP, Respondents
    No. 11 WAL 2019
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    May 30, 2019
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity is:

Did the Superior Court err in determining the mortgage at issue was not a "residential mortgage" and that petitioners are therefore not entitled to seek damages pursuant to 41 P.S. §§ 406 and 502?