Case ID: okla-crim_10/html/0615-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DOYLE, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WALTER MYRICK v. STATE.
    No. A-2038.
    Opinion Filed May 18, 1914.
    (140 Pac. 788.)
    APPEAL — Failure to Prosecute Appeal — Affirmance. Where a defendant appeals froip a judgment of conviction, and no briefs are filed, or argument presented, this court will make an examination of the record projJer, and, if no prejudicial error is apparent, will affirm the judgment.
    
      Appeal from County Court; Choctazv County; W. T. Glenn„ Judge.
    
    Walter Myrick was convicted of carrying a pistol, and appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      Warren & Rogers, for plaintiff in error.
   DOYLE, J.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Choctaw county upon an information which charged a violation of section 2546 of the Penal Code. On May 2, 1913, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, he was by the court sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a'period of 60 days. To reverse the judgment, an appeal was taken.

No briefs have been filed, and, when the case was called for final submission, no appearance was made on behalf of plaintiff in error. Thereupon the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal.

We have examined the record proper, and have discovered no error which will warrant a reversal of the judgment. The motion to affirm the judgment is therefore sustained.

ARMSTRONG, P. J., and FURMAN, J., concur.