Case ID: scl_18/html/0407-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per O’Neali., J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

H. H. Covington v. John M. Rogers, Adm’r.
    At the execution of a writ of inquiry, the defendant is restricted to eviidence in mitigation of damages, where they are uncertain: He cannot go into evidence in discharge of the action, or of payments, or other discounts.
   Per O’Neali., J.

confirming the decision of Mr. Justice (xantt, at Darlington, Spring Term, 1831.

Johnson, J. and Harper, J. concurred.