Case ID: f-appx_484/html/0845-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin TUCKER, a/k/a KT, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 12-6877.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 12, 2012.
    Decided: Oct. 12, 2012.
    Kevin Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appel-lee.
    
      Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Tucker appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Tucker, No. 3:05-cr-00322-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Apr. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.