Case ID: f-appx_707/html/0203-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles Alonzo TUNSTALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank L. PERRY; Beverly Stubbs, R.N.; Dr. Arthur Davis; Clinton Brockington; Dr. Sami Hussan; Jane Welch; Dr. Donald Micklos; Lynda Padgett; Lititia Owens; Lequecia Falcon; Paula Y. Smith; Ms. Carmen S. Hendricks; Dr. Keyser; Peter Woglam, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 17-7023
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: December 21, 2017
    Decided: December 28, 2017
    Charles Alonzo Tunstall, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent.in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Alonzo Tunstall appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing TunstalTs 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tunstall v. Perry, No. 1:16-cv-01434-LCB-JEP (M.D.N.C, July 25, 2017). We dispense with oi’al argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED