Case ID: f2d_873/html/1406-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re William D. KRAEMER, Debtor. William D. KRAEMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Glynn H. CROOK, Cynthia M. Crook, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 88-8839
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    May 24, 1989.
    Tash J. Van Dora, Saveli & Williams, S. Lester Tate, III, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.
    William Eugene Otwell, Austell, Ga., for defendants-appellees.
    
      Before TJOFLAT, FAY and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

We affirm the district court’s judgment for the reasons stated in its dispositive order of October 4, 1988. See Kraemer v. Crook, 94 B.R. 207 (N.D.Ga.1988).

AFFIRMED.