Case ID: ark_326/html/0465-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Paul SCHLAF and Scott Harford v. Frank GILBERT and Sharon Priest, Secretary of State of the State of Arkansas
    96-1037
    930 S.W.2d 384
    Supreme Court of Arkansas
    Opinion delivered October 28, 1996
    
      
      Oscar Stilley, for petitioners.
    
      Kelly Law Firm, PLC, by: A.J. Kelly, for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

This is the second of two original actions

challenging proposed Amendment 9. On October 21, 1996, this court handed down its opinion in the first case. In that opinion, we held that proposed Amendment 9 was violative of the amendment process provided by Article V of the United States Constitution and, consequently, exceeded the scope of the powers reserved to the people in Amendment 7 of the Arkansas Constitution. We ordered that proposed Amendment 9 not be placed on the ballot, or, alternatively, that the results of the vote on the proposal not be certified. Donovan v. Priest, No. 96-1120 (Ark. Oct. 21, 1996). As a result, this second case has become moot, and, accordingly, we dismiss it.