Case ID: f-appx_11/html/0767-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Emmanuel Onuoha ACHONU, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
    No. 99-70997.
    INS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 5, 2001.
    
    Decided March 28, 2001.
    
      Before KOZINSKI and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges, and ZAPATA, District Judge.
    
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
    
      
       The Honorable Frank R. Zapata, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Aehonu has presented no evidence that the deportation order entered against him in 1984 was defective, and we thus reject his contention that he was improperly placed in exclusion proceedings. Because Aehonu was properly placed in exclusion proceedings upon his attempted re-entry into the United States, the BIA lacked jurisdiction to entertain his motion to reopen the prior deportation proceedings. See 8 C.F.R. § 3.2(d).

DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.