Case ID: nj-eq_100/html/0583-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

City of Newark, complainant, v. Hugh F. Cook et al., defendants.
    [Decided January 31st, 1927.]
    On appeal of Surety Kealty Company.
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, whose opinion is reported in 99 N. J. Eq. 527.
    
    
      Messrs. Stein, Stein & Bannoch, for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. McOarter & English, Messrs. Lindabury, Bepue & Faullcs and Messrs. Bilder & Bilder, for the defendants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Treeohard, Multure, Kalisch, Black, Katzeebach, Campbell, Lloyd, Vae Buskirk, McGleeeoe, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.