Case ID: so2d_932/html/0588-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Shirley A. SMITH, Appellant, v. Carolyn R. SMITH, Appellee.
    No. 5D05-2343.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    June 30, 2006.
    Robert Robins, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
    Richard J. D’Amico, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Pullo v. Pullo, 926 So.2d 448, 453 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (en banc) (Kahn, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (“Florida courts uniformly agree that section 61.14(1), Florida Statutes, does not allow modification of a property distribution.”).

SAWAYA, ORFINGER, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.