Case ID: f-appx_71/html/0990-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Derrick Ronard GIBBS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-6920.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 14, 2003.
    Decided Aug. 22, 2003.
    Derrick Ronard Gibbs, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Derrick Ronard Gibbs appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion to Compel Government for Motion for Reduction of Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) and Rule 35(b) Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Gibbs, No. CR-98-192 (W.D.N.C. June 3, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.