Case ID: sw2d_796/html/0896-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Farah DAEE, Claimant-Appellant, v. DRURY’S LTD., Employer-Respondent.
    No. 57783.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    July 24, 1990.
    John J. Larsen, Jr., St. Louis, for claimant-appellant.
    Preston E. Roskin, Clayton, for employer-respondent.
   ORDER

Employee appeals from a final order by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission which denies compensation in a worker's compensation case. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).