Case ID: ga-app_27/html/0639-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

12792.
    Barclay v. City of Ellijay.
   Broyles, C. J.

“ Where in a certificate to a bill of exceptions the judge certifies that the bill of exceptions ‘ as amended is true, and the amendment referred to consists of a note by the judge which precedes . the certificate and which shows that the bill of exceptions is in part not true, the writ of error must be dismissed. While the judge may supply omissions in a bill of exceptions by interlineations or notes, any interlineation or note which has the effect of showing that some of the averments in the bill of exceptions are not true will work a dismissal of the writ of error, when the bill of exceptions is certified to be true only as amended. Fort v. Sheffield, 108 Ga. 781 [33 S. E. 660], and case cited; Sanges v. State, 110 Ga. 260 [34 S. E. 327]. See also Johnson v. Equitable Security Company, 113 Ga. 1153 [39 S. E. 473], and cases cited.” Jarriel v. Jarriel, 115 Ga. 23 (41 S. E. 262).

Decided November 17, 1921.

Certiorari; from Gilmer superior court —'Judge Blair. July 8, 1921.

A. N. Edwards, T. A. Brown, for plaintiff in error.

Under the above ruling and the facts of the instant case this court has no jurisdiction to consider the bill of exceptions.

Writ of error dismissed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, J., concur.