Case ID: ad_254/html/0779-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Morris Neinken, Respondent, v. Samuel Brill, Appellant, and Others, Defendants.
   In an action to recover of defendant Brill the possession or the value of certain bonds admittedly stolen from plaintiff, of which that defendant claimed to be a holder in due course and without notice of defect in title, the verdict was for plaintiff. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. (See Neinhen v. Brill, 251 App. Div. 730.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.