Case ID: njl_121/html/0587-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FEIST & FEIST, INC., RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM P. HURLEY, APPELLANT.
    Argued October 21, 1938
    Decided January 13, 1939.
    For the respondent, Schotland, Harrison & Schotland.
    
    For the appellant, Harry Unger.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bodine, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 12.

For reversal — -Heher, Walker, JJ. 2.