Case ID: ad3d_13/html/0194-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edwardo Diaz, Appellant.
    [785 NYS2d 909]
   Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie Wittner, J), rendered May 23, 2003, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to a term of 16 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s applications to withdraw his guilty plea and for reassignment of counsel (see People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520 [1978]). Although defendant received a sufficient opportunity to present his contentions both in writing and by addressing the court, he did not specify a legal basis for any relief (see e.g. People v Gaskin, 2 AD3d 347 [2003], lv denied 2 NY3d 740 [2004]). The record establishes that defendant’s plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary and was entered with the effective assistance of counsel (see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]).

Defendant’s constitutional challenge to the procedure under which he was sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit (see People v Rosen, 96 NY2d 329 [2001], cert denied 534 US 899 [2001]). Defendant’s mandatory sentence as a persistent violent felony offender was triggered solely by his prior convictions (see Almendarez-Torres v United States, 523 US 224 [1998]). Concur—Williams, J.P., Marlow, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.