Case ID: f2d_226/html/0204-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harold Ladd PIERCE, Appellant, v. PERLITE AGGREGATES, Inc., a corporation, and Antonio J. Almeida, Appellees.
    No. 14232.
    United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit
    Oct. 3, 1955.
    Rehearing Denied Nov. 3, 1955.
    See also D.C., 110 F.Supp. 684.
    Jamieson & Gabriel, Los Angeles, Cal., C. J., Goodell, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
    Burns, Doane, Benedict & Irons, James P. Burns, Washington, D. C., for appel-lees.
    Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and STEPHENS and ORR, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

This action, No. 14,232, was consolidated on appeal with the ease of Pierce v. Muehleisen and Muehleisen Perlite Processing, Inc., No. 14,184, 9 Cir., 226 F.2d 200. The validity of the same patent, No. 2,501,962, was in issue in both cases and in each held invalid. What we have said in case No. 14,184 has application to the instant case. Upon authority of case No. 14,184 the judgment in this case, No. 14,232, is affirmed.

Affirmed.