Case ID: so2d_654/html/0301-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Buddy Dwayne HEMPHILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 94-188.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    May 5, 1995.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and Jamie Spivey, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Douglas Gurnic, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The consecutive habitual offender sentences imposed in Counts I and II are impermissible under Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994), therefore we REVERSE and REMAND for resentenc-ing on those two counts. Resentencing may include restructuring to provide for a probationary period, see Jordan v. State, 568 So.2d 1011 (Fla.App. 1 Dist.1990).

BOOTH, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.