Case ID: ad2d_140/html/0989-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William Hughes et al., Respondents-Appellants, v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy et al., Defendants, and Nussbaumer & Clarke, Inc., Appellant-Respondent. Nussbaumer & Clarke, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v Buffalo Sewer Authority, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
    (Appeal No. 2.)
   The affidavits and documents submitted on the motion to reargue were not before the court on the initial application for summary judgment, and those new facts may not be injected at the appellate level (Matter of Bligen v Kelly, 126 AD2d 989; Broida v Bancroft, 103 AD2d 88). Accordingly, we modify that portion of the order settling the record on appeal for the summary judgment proceeding by deleting the material appearing at pages 283 through 336 of the printed record. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Ostrowski, J. — reargument.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.