Case ID: ohio-st-3d_49/html/0606-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Medley, Appellant, v. J.H. Williams Industrial Products, Inc. et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as Medley v. J.H. Williams Indus. Prod., Inc. (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 606.]
    (No. 88-1937
    Submitted January 9, 1990
    Decided March 7, 1990.)
    
      Powers & Sobieski, Ralph P. Sobieski and DonaldH. Powers, for appellant.
    
      Kirkland & Ellis, Richard C. Godfrey, Chaim T. Kijfel, Sheila W. Elston, Ulmer & Berne and Marvin L. Karp, for appellees Williams, Polaris, Doede, Dines and Hansmann.
    
      Arthur Young & Company, Patricia A. McGovern, Thompson, Hiñe & Flory, Mark Kennedy and Barry L. Lubow, for appellees Arthur Young, Poison and Keider.
   This appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.

Holmes, J., dissenting. I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.