Case ID: f2d_817/html/0030-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CLEVELAND NEWSPAPER GUILD, LOCAL 1, NEWSPAPER GUILD, AFL-CIO, CLC, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The PLAIN DEALER PUBLISHING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 86-3140.
    United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
    April 29, 1987.
    George W. Palda, Berkman, Gordon, Murray & Palda, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiffs-appellants.
    Karen B. Newborn, Baker & Hostetler, Cleveland, Ohio, Elliot S. Azoff, for defendant-appellee.
    Before LIVELY, Chief Judge, ENGEL, KEITH, MERRITT, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, KRUPANSKY, WELLFORD, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as practicable.