Case ID: njl_79/html/0604-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LONG DOCK COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. STATE BOARD OF ASSESSORS ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR. MORRIS AND ESSEX RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. STATE BOARD OF ASSESSORS ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR. CENTRAL RAILROAD OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. STATE BOARD OF ASSESSORS ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.
    Argued March 7, 1910 —
    Decided June 20, 1910.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 49 Vroom 44.
    For the Long Dock Company, Collins & Corbin.
    
    For tiie Morris and Essex Railroad Company, Edwards & Smith.
    
    For the Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, George Holmes.
    
    For the State Board of Assessors, Edmund Wilson, attorney-general .
   Per Cueiam.

The judgments under review herein should lie affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Garrison in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chibe Justice, Sway,zb, Trenchard, Parker, Bogert, Yroom, Gray, Dill, Congdon, JJ. 9.

For reversal — Tub, Chancellor, Minturn, J. 2.