Case ID: so2d_651/html/0822-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael WONDERLICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 94-0893.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    March 15, 1995.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Publi'c Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions, and the lifetime revocation of his driver’s license. See Novaton v. State, 634 So.2d 607 (Fla. 1994); State v. Wright, 546 So.2d 798 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Onesky v. State, 544 So.2d 1048 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). However, because the parties operated under a misapprehension of the law as to the revocation of appellant’s driver’s license, the affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s filing a motion to withdraw his plea or a rule 3.850 motion. See Gainer v. State, 590 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

GLICKSTEIN, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.