Case ID: sw3d_165/html/0197-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Paul L. DOBBINS, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 84522.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    June 21, 2005.
    
      Maleaner Ryna Harvey, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Deborah Daniels, Dora A. Fichter, Co-Counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Paul L. Dobbins (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession of a controlled substance in violation of Section 195.202 RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not plainly err, State v. Santillan, 1 S.W.3d 572, 578 (Mo.App. E.D.1999), or abuse its discretion, State v. Granado, 148 S.W.3d 309, 311 (Mo.banc2004), in denying Appellant’s motion to suppress evidence, because the evidence was not obtained as a result of an unlawful seizure. State v. Stacy, 121 S.W.3d 328, 332 (Mo.App. W.D.2003). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).