Case ID: f-appx_397/html/0868-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edith BUDIK, MD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael P. BRAZAITIS, Defendant-Appellee, v. United States of America, Movant-Appellee.
    No. 09-2392.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 31, 2010.
    Decided: Oct. 13, 2010.
    Edith Budik, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Larry David Adams, Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
   Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edith Budik seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting the motion to substitute the United States as defendant in this civil action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Budik seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Maron v. United States, 126 F.3d 317, 321 n. 4 (4th Cir.1997). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.