Case ID: f-appx_156/html/0587-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Shueyb Mossa JOKHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John J. LAMANNA, Warden; J. Wakulsky, Unit Manager; K. Hammond, Case Manager, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 05-6691.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 22, 2005.
    Decided: Dec. 2, 2005.
    Shueyb Mossa Jokhan, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murder Bowens, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Shueyb Mossa Jokhan appeals the district court’s adoption of a magistrate’s recommendation to dismiss his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jokhan v. LaManna, No. CA-04-21874-6-HFF (D.S.C. Apr. 15, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED 
      
       We do not address Jokhan’s claim that he is being discriminated against because of his religion as this claim is raised for the first time on appeal. See Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir.1993) (holding that issues raised for the first time on appeal are generally waived absent exceptional circumstances).