Case ID: fla_142/html/0470-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eddie Smith and Woody Smith v. State.
    194 So. 874
    Division A
    Opinion Filed March 22, 1940
    Rehearing Denied April 12, 1940
    
      Douglas & Schad, Zach H. Douglas and Ira Carter, Jr., for Plaintiffs in Error;
    
      George Couper Gibbs, Attorney General, Thomas J. Ellis and William Fisher, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for Defendants in Error.
   Per Curiam.

On writ of error, we review judgment of conviction of the offense of larceny of hogs.

The only question presented is a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. The evidence has been examined and carefully considered. It is conflicting and the jury resolved the conflicts against the accused.

No reversible error is shown. See Hamlin v. State, 80 Fla. 217, 85 Sou. 685; Strobhar v. State, 55 Fla. 167, 47 Sou. 4; Danley v. State, 135 Fla. 28, 184 Sou. 525.

The judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, J., concurs in opinion -and judgment.

Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.