Case ID: ohio-law-abs_3/html/0716-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WILLIAM, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 944
    PALMER v. CASE PLOW WORKS CO.
    Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist., Wood Co.
    No. 359.
    Decided Nov. 2, 1925
    148. BILL OF EXCEPTIONS—Court must certify that it contains all the evidence of the trial before Court of Appeals can consider review of case.
    Attorneys—E. V. Bope & Riegle and Cheney for Palmer; N. R. Harrington for Company; all of Bowling Green.
   WILLIAM, J.

J. C. Palmer in this case claims that the court below erred in directing a verdict for the J. I. Case Plow Works Co. As there is no certificate of the trial judge setting out that the. bill of exceptions contains all the evidence, this court cannot consider the question raised as to whether or not the court erred in so ruling. Regan, Admx. vs. McHugh, 78. Ohio' St., 326.

It does not appear from the record that there was any other error in the proceedings. The judgment will therefore be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.