Case ID: so2d_724/html/1274-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DAUKSCH, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David C. YOUMANS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 98-2477.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Feb. 12, 1999.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Nancy Ryan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Patrick W. Krechowski, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
   DAUKSCH, J.

This is an appeal from a sentence which violates the rule set out in Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993). Thus we must vacate the sentence and remand for a proper one. The question posed in Tripp was:

IF A TRIAL COURT IMPOSES A TERM OF PROBATION ON ONE OFFENSE CONSECUTIVE TO A SENTENCE OF INCARCERATION ON ANOTHER OFFENSE, CAN JAIL CREDIT FROM THE FIRST OFFENSE BE DENIED ON A SENTENCE IMPOSED AFTER A REVOCATION OF PROBATION THE SECOND OFFENSE?

The supreme court said no, so we all must follow that dictate. In addition, it appears the sentencing seoresheet should be corrected regarding points for victim injury, and the sentence rendered accox-dingly.

SENTENCE VACATED, REMANDED.

W. SHARP and THOMPSON, J., concur.