Case ID: so3d_201/html/0665-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Titus Laqual HENLEY, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    Nos. 3D15-1572, 3D15-925.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 30, 2016.
    Titus Laqual Henley, in proper person.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
    Before SALTER, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

On November 4, 2015, this Court issued an opinion denying Titus Laqual Henley’s two most recent petitions for writs of mandamus, which were consolidated. Our opinion denying Henley’s petitions contained an order to show cause why Henley should not be prohibited from filing with this Court any further pro se appeals, petitions, motions or other proceedings related to his criminal sentence in circuit court case numbers 07-17576A and 09-16471A.

Henley responded on November 16, 2015, by filing with this Court a response to the order to show cause. Although Henley argues .in his response that he has not abused the judicial process and has a right to continue to proceed pro se, the tangled record in this case indicates otherwise. Henley’s response raises no new information or argument for our further consideration. Accordingly, we conclude that Henley has not shown good cause to justify further pro se filings of appeals, petitions, motions, or other proceedings with this Court.

As Henley has acknowledged in his response, we must balance Henley’s pro se right of access to courts with this Court’s need to devote finite resources to legitimate appeals. We recognize the seriousness of the sanction when the litigant is a criminal defendant. State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47, 48 (Fla.1999). After an order to show cause and an opportunity to respond, however, a court may prevent such further filings if petitioner fails to show good cause. Id.

It is hereby ordered that the Clerk of the Court of the Third District Court of Appeal shall refuse further filings related to lower tribunal case numbers 07-17576A and 09-16471A; provided, however, that filings related to case numbers 07-17576A and 09-16471A may be accepted by the Clerk if such filings have been reviewed and signed by an attorney who is a licensed member of the Florida Bar in good standing.

Any further and unauthorized pro se filings by Henley will subject him to sanctions, including the issuance of written findings forwarded to the Florida Department of Corrections for consideration by it for disciplinary action, pursuant to section 944.279(1) of the Florida Statutes.

Order issued.