Case ID: f-appx_153/html/0897-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronald DICK, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 05-1470.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 31, 2005.
    Decided: Nov. 14, 2005.
    
      Ronald Dick, Appellant Pro Se. Neil Ray White, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Ronald Dick appeals the district court’s order granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment in his claim challenging the application of the Windfall Elimination Provision to his Social Security benefits. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Dick v. Barnhart, No. CA-04-762-WGC (D.Md. Apr. 7, 2005). We deny Dick’s pending motions to “Supplement the Record on Appeal,” “Regarding MSPB Ruling,” to “Consolidate Issues,” and for “Further Ruling.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED 
      
       The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West Supp.2005).