Case ID: f-appx_470/html/0138-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles W. WITT, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Dr. CHAUNDRY, Director Medical; Ryan Erwin, Security Officer; Officer Abdussloam, Security Officer, Defendants—Appellees, and Stephen M. Herrick, Acting Director V.C.B.R.; Chad Houser, Director of Security; Duncan Benton, Transportation Security Officer, Defendants.
    No. 11-7740.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 29, 2012.
    Decided: April 3, 2012.
    Charles W. Witt, Appellant Pro Se. Rosalie Fessier, Timberlake, Smith, Thomas & Moses, PC, Staunton, Virginia; Rachel Joan Baer, Allyson Kurzmann Tysinger, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Charles W. Witt appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and granting summary judgment to Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Witt v. Chaundry, No. l:10-cv-01164-LOIDD, 2011 WL 6140959 (E.D.Va. Dec. 9, 2011). We deny Witt’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.