Case ID: dallam_1/html/0493-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HEMPHILL, Chief Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JUNE TERM, 1843.
    No. I.
    Bartholomew Manlove v. Thomas Kinney.
    (See .)
    
      Appeal from Bastrop.
    
    
      
      .—Manlove v. Kinney, p. 493.
      Notice of appeal is essential to appellate jurisdiction, and can not be waived. Lockhart v. Lockhart, 1 T., 200; Burr v. Lewis, 6 T., 76; Bennett v. Spillers, 7 T., 600; Hughes v. State, 3.3 T., 683; Thomas v. Childs, 36 T., 148; Loften v. Nalley, 28 T., 127; Holek v. Varona, 63 T., 65; Smithwick v. Kelly, 79 T., 564; Nickerson v. Nickerson, 65 T., 281; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. O’Keefe, 87 T., 423.
    
   HEMPHILL, Chief Justice.

In this case no notice of appeal was given in the court below, nor was any bond filed.

There is then no foundation for the exercise of the jurisdiction of this tribunal, and the case is accordingly ordered to be removed from the docket.