Case ID: neb_90/html/0736-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nathan Ray Forsha, appellee, v. Nebraska Moline Plow Company, appellant.
    Filed February 10, 1912.
    No. 16,411.
    Opinion on motion for rehearing of case reported in 89 Neb. 770.
    
      Rehearing denied.
    
   Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the motion for a rehearing, and in view of the rule announced in Chicago, St. P., M. & O. R. Co. v. McManigal, 73 Neb. 585, we are of opinion that no judgment should have been rendered on the verdict in this case.

It is therefore considered that the judgment against-the plaintiff and in favor of defendant Murdock & Son, and the judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the Nebraska Moline Plow Company, should be reversed and the cause remanded to the district court for a new trial, with leave to the plaintiff to proceed against both of the defendants.

The motion for a rehearing is

Overruled.