Case ID: so_169/html/0100-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

TULANE HARDWOOD LUMBER CO., Inc. v. SINGER LUMBER CO., Inc.
    No. 16324.
    Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.
    June 22, 1936.
    For former opinion, see 168 So. 368.
    Wisdom & Stone and Norton L. Wisdom, all of New Orleans, for appellant.
    Cobb & Jones and Herman M. Baginsky, all of New Orleans, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellant, in application for rehearing, complains of the fact that in our decree we did not reserve to him the right to obtain possession of the merchandise which formed the basis of the suit upon payment by him of the amount of the judgment rendered against him.

No such reservation in the decree is necessai'y. The amount of the decree is the purchase price of the articles, and, obviously, when the amount thereof is paid, defendant will be entitled to possession of the articles for which he will then have paid the purchase price.

The application for rehearing is refused.

Reheáring refused.