Case ID: so2d_954/html/0695-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Garion TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D05-4020.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    April 18, 2007.
    Alexander R. Brumfield, III of Alexander R. Brumfield, III, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Monique E. LTtalien, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant was -convicted of robbery with a firearm and argues, in this direct appeal, that his trial counsel was ineffective for not objecting to an officer and the victim giving opinion testimony. The two witnesses, however, did not give the type of opinion testimony which might be inadmissible. They were merely testifying as to how certain they were in their identification of appellant as the person who had committed the crime. The testimony was accordingly admissible.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, C.J., KLEIN and SHAHÓOD, JJ.,„coneur.