Case ID: ga-app_30/html/0161-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

14182.
    American Mills Co. v. Pruitt-Barrett Hardware Co.
    Decided April 11, 1923.
   Bloodworth, J.

The court did not err in directing a verdict for the defendant. “The mere fact that there are conflicts in the testimony does not render the direction of a verdict in favor of a party erroneous,' when it appears that the conflicts are immaterial, and that, giving to the opposite party the benefit of the most favorable view of the evidence as a whole and of all legitimate inferences therefrom, the verdict against him is demanded.” Dorris v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 22 Ga. App. 514 (5), 518 (5) (96 S. E. 450), and citations.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J-., conour.

Complaint; from city court of Hall county — Judge Sloan. November 20, 1922.

J. 0. Adams, B. P. Gaillard Jr., for plaintiff.

O. N. Davie, for defendant.