Case ID: ga-app_7/html/0308-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Hill, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

2002.
    Stahl v. Sommer.
    Trover; from city court of Atlanta — Judge Eeid. June 12, 1909.
    Argued October 26, 1909.
    Decided January 21, 1910.
    
      F. B. Radensleben, for plaintiff. W. W. Visanska, for defendant..
   Hill, C. J.

1. In an action of trover to recover possession of a diaznozid ring, where the issue made by the evidence was whether the plaintiff had title to the ring, or had advanced to the defendant the money with which to purchase the ring, it was not error for the court to instruct the jury, in effect, that if they believed the latter to be the truth, the plaintiff’s remedy would be a suit for the mozzey advanced, azzd not a suit for the ring.

2. The evidezzce fully supports the verdict. Judgment affirmed.