Case ID: me_115/html/0554-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Henry M. Young vs. Lewiston, Augusta and Waterville Street Railway.
    Androscoggin.
    Decided October 28, 1916.
    
      Tascus Atwood, for plaintiff. Newell & Woodside, for defendant.
   In this case the plaintiff was the owner of the team driven by the plaintiff in case of Taylor v. L. A. & W. St. Ry., and he seeks to recover damages for the injury to the team caused by the collision. The case is governed by the same rules of law as Taylor v. L. A. & W. St. Ry., and the judgment must be the same as the judgment in that case. Motion overruled.