Case ID: so2d_828/html/0957-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SHAW, Judge. COBB, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Karen CABARRUBIA v. STATE of Alabama.
    CR-00-1688.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    March 1, 2002.
    Thomas Edgar Dasinger, Daphne, for appellant.
    Bill Pryor, atty. gen., and Joseph G.L. Marston III, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.
   SHAW, Judge.

AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

McMILLAN, P.J., and BASCHAB and WISE, JJ., concur. COBB, J., concurs in the result, and concurs in part and dissents in part as to the rationale, with opinion.

COBB, Judge,

concurring in the result, and concurring in part and dissenting in part as to the rationale.

I concur in the result reached by the majority in its unpublished memorandum. However, as to Issue I, I disagree with the rationale. Based on my review of the record, it appears that Karen Cabarrubia’s objection identified with sufficient particularity the basis of her objection, and it appears that the trial court understood that she was alleging a lack of compliance with the statutory attestation requirements for admission of the document. Because the record was not subject to the requirements of the statute on which Ca-barrubia relies, however, her claim on appeal must fail on the merits.