Case ID: ad_212/html/0884-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles Sirota, Respondent, v. Joseph Shacknovitz and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with Another, Defendant.
   Upon reargument, judgment reversed on the law, and a now trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon authority of Happel v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. (210 App. Div. 461) and O’Connor v. Webber (239 N. Y. 191). Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox and Young, JJ., concur, Kelby, J., dissents on the ground that the situation presented in the .case at bar is different from the Happel ease.