Case ID: ga-app_10/html/0012-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Hill, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

3258.
    Arnold et al. v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.
    Decided November 7, 1911.
    Complaint; from city court of Waycross — Judge McDonald.
    February 6, 1911.
    
      Allen B. Spence, James B. Thomas, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Patterson & Copeland, Wilson, Bennett & Lamb dim, contra.
   Hill, C. J.

The positive evidence proved that all the sacks of guano sold to the defendants were branded and tagged and came fully up to the requirements of the statute. The evidence to the contrary was negative in character and without 'probative value. No error of law appears, and the verdict as directed was demanded by the evidence. The case is controlled by the decision of the Supreme Court in Ilolt v. Havassa Guano Co., 114 Ga. 666 (40 S. E. 735). Judgment affirmed.