Case ID: nys_31/html/1127-12.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GAGE et al., Respondents, v. LIPPMAN et al., Appellants.
    (Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.
    December 3, 1894.)
    Action by Alvin A. Gage and Henry S. Bennett against Julius Lippman and Louis Levy.
   PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss the appeal) should be denied. The appellants served the printed cases on appeal several years ago, and the respondents could have brought the case on for hearing at any time. The appellants urge that the respondents have violated their stipulation to mark the printed case settled, as containing all the evidence. This allegation is not denied. The cause had better be brought on at the next term, and disposed of in the ordinary way.