Case ID: f-appx_688/html/0712-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando A. NINO, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-15230 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    (May 15, 2017)
    Roberta Josephina Bodnar, U.S. Attorney’s Office — FLM, Ocala, FL, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, Yvette Rhodes, Joseph K. Ruddy, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Rosemary Cakmis, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, Mary A. Mills, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellant
    Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

All Kamalzadeh, appointed counsel for Fernando Nino in this appeal of the denial of Nino’s motion to reduce his sentence, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Nino’s motion to reduce his sentence is AFFIRMED.