Case ID: f-appx_216/html/0627-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rodney Jesse SAN NICOLAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ed ALAMEIDA, individually and as Director of the California Department of Corrections; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 05-17170.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 21, 2006 .
    Filed Dec. 29, 2006.
    Rodney Jesse San Nicolas, San Quentin, CA, pro se.
    Tom Blake, Esq., AGCA—Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds.this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Rodney Jesse San Nicolas, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm because the district court properly concluded that appellant failed to show any genuine issue on his claim that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs, see id. at 1056-57.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.