Case ID: or-app_48/html/0229-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted June 12,
    affirmed September 15, 1980
    In the Matter of the Compensation of THOMPSON, Petitioner - Cross-Respondent, v. BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION, Respondent - Cross-Petitioner.
    
    (No. 78-7871-E, CA 16118)
    615 P2d 1206
    David W. Hittle, Salem, waived argument for petitioner - cross-respondent. With him on the brief was Olson, Hittle, Gardner & Evans, Salem.
    Paul De Muniz, Salem, argued the cause for respondent - cross-petitioner. With him on the brief was Garrett, Seideman, Hemann, Robertson & De Muniz, P.C., Salem.
    Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Roberts and Campbell, Judges.
    PER CURIAM.
   PER CURIAM.

The attorney’s fees issue argued to us in this case was not adequately preserved before the Board. We are in agreement with the Board’s factual determination.

Affirmed.