Case ID: nev_91/html/0117-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FRED SELBY, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent.
    No. 8090
    February 26, 1975
    531 P.2d 1356
    
      Morgan D. Harris, Public Defender, and Kelly H. Swanson, Deputy, Clark County, for Appellant.
    
      Robert List, Attorney General, Carson City; George E. Holt, District Attorney, and Daniel M. Seaton, Chief Deputy, Clark County, for Respondent.
   OPINION

Per Curiam:

In this appeal from an order denying a pretrial petition for habeas corpus, we believe the evidence adduced at the preliminary examination justified the magistrate’s determination that there was probable cause to hold appellant for trial. NRS 171.206. See concurring opinion by Zenoff, J., in Franklin v. State, 89 Nev. 382, 389, 513 P.2d 1252, 1257 (1973).

“[W]e are not now doncerned with the prospect that the evidence presently in the record may, by itself, be insufficient to sustain a conviction.” McDonald v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 326, 327, 512 P.2d 774, 775 (1973).

The order denying habeas relief is affirmed.