Case ID: nd_48/html/0577-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Grace, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BEN HANSON, Respondent, v. CHAS H. HOUSKA and A. L. MARTIN, Appellants.
    (186 N. W. 256)
    Followed case. See Nasset v. Houska, et al. post, 186 N. W. 255.
    Opinion filed Dec. 12, 1921.
    The judgment appealed from is affirmed. The respondent is entitled to his costs and disbursements on appeal.
    
      Kchoe & Moseley, for appellants.
    
      Sinness & Duffy, for respondent.
    Grace, C. J. and Christianson, Bird.zell, Robinson, Bronson, JJ„ concur.
   Grace, C. J.

The questions presented on appeal in this case are similar to those presented in the case of Karoline Nasset, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Chas. H. Houska and A. L. Martin, Defendants and Appellants, recently decided by this court, post, 668, 186 N. W. 255 and is ruled by the decision in that case.