Case ID: mich_11/html/0197-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People on the relation of Aldert Plugger and others v. The Township Board of Fillmore.
    ‘Where cause has been shown in opposition to an application for a mandamus, and an argument is not had until a subsequent term, the case must be noticed* and placed upon the docket for argument as a calender cause, and printed briefs furnished.
    
      Decided April 8th.
    
    Application for a mandamus. An order to show cause having been made, cause was shown at the last January-term, but argument was not had at that term. The question now arising whether the application was to be heard as a motion, or as a calender cause.
    
      A. Russell, for the People.
    N. A. Balch, for respondents.
   The Court held that where, after cause shown, the. application stands over to a subsequent term, it must be noticed and placed upon the docket as a calender cause, and printed briefs be furnished as in other cases.