Case ID: so2d_608/html/0119-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jacqueline SABAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 91-1537.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Nov. 4, 1992.
    Rehearing or Clarification and Rehearing En Banc Denied Dec. 15, 1992.
    Alexander M. Siegel, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Patricia G. Lampert, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence finding there was sufficient evidence presented by the state inconsistent with appellant’s hypothesis of innocence to overcome the motion for judgment of acquittal. See State v. Law, 559 So.2d 187 (Fla.1989). We consider Grover v. State, 581 So.2d 1379 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), factually distinguishable. We find no error in the remaining points on appeal.

DELL, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.