Case ID: so2d_618/html/0368-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Danny J. SCALF, Appellant, v. Harry K. SINGLETARY, Secretary; Department of Corrections, Appellee.
    No. 92-357.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    May 21, 1993.
    Order Granting Clarification but Denying Rehearing July 22, 1993.
    Danny J. Scalf, pro se.
    No brief filed, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus or alternative writ of mandamus, without prejudice to appellant to re-submit his grievance appeal to the Secretary, Department of Corrections, attaching a copy of his formal grievance and response in compliance with Rule 33-29.2007, Florida Administrative Code.

MINER, MICKLE, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellant’s motion for clarification of a rule citation that was printed inadvertently in error and correct our opinion (Fla. 1st DCA May 21, 1993), to substitute Rule 33-29.007 for Rule 33-29.2007, Florida Administrative Code.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied.

MINER, MICKLE, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Associate Judge, concur.