Case ID: f-appx_698/html/0587-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edwin HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 17-10880 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    (October 3, 2017)
    Jillian M. Jewell, Yvette Rhodes, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, Taylor G. Stout, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Edwin Hernandez, Pro Se
    Before HULL, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Rosanne Brady, appointed counsel for Edwin Hernandez in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L,Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit the appeal is.correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hernán-dez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.