Case ID: so2d_228/html/0909-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David E. K. FRISCHKORN, Petitioner, v. Thomasine G. FRISCHKORN, Respondent.
    No. 38793.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Dec. 17, 1969.
    Earl Waldin, Jr., of Smathers & Thompson, Miami, for petitioner.
    Eugene C. Heiman of Heiman & Crary, Miami, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ -and have heard argument of the parties. After argument and 'upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. Therefore, the writ is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

The Motion for Attorney’s Fees is hereby granted in the amount of $350.00.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., and MANN, District Court Judge, concur.