Case ID: njl_102/html/0724-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CATHERINE SMITH, RESPONDENT, v. PUBLIC SERVICE RAILWAY COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Argued February 3, 1926
    Decided April 1, 1926.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N. J. Mis. R. 993.
    For the respondent, Henry P. Bedford.
    
    For the appellant, Leonard J. Tynan.
    
   Per Curiam.

Tlie judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Kalisch, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.