Case ID: or-app_95/html/0754-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM EDMONDS, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted January 27,
    affirmed March 22, 1989
    In the Matter of the Marriage of RHODES, Respondent, and RHODES, Appellant.
    
    (CV87-0623; CA A48985)
    770 P2d 615
    Larry W. Stuber, Corvallis, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Patrick L. Hadlock, Robert G. Ringo and Ringo & Stuber, P.C., Corvallis.
    Steven P. Allen, Corvallis, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.
    Before Joseph, Chief Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
    Edmonds, J., dissenting.
   PER CURIAM

Even on de novo review, the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate that the trial court erred. McCoy and McCoy, 28 Or App 919, 562 P2d 207 (1977). Appellant has not met that burden, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed. No costs to either party.

EDMONDS, J.,

dissenting.

On de novo review, I would delete the award of permanent spousal support.