Case ID: so2d_575/html/1375-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "FRANK, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William CUNNINGHAM a/k/a John Jenken, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 90-01752.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 13, 1991.
    A.R. Mander, III, of Greenfelder, Man-der, Hanson & Murphy, Dade City, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Brenda S. Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   FRANK, Judge.

We affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence imposed following violation of probation. We note, however, that the court made no finding that the appellant was able to pay the costs of supervision, one of the grounds upon which his probation was violated.

We therefore strike from the order of revocation any reference to condition number 2. See Rainey v. State, 528 So.2d 528 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Reynolds v. State, 498 So.2d 607 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.