Case ID: ad_284/html/0874-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Caroline Wenzel, Respondent, v. Anton Wenzel et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
   Order denying motion to dismiss complaint unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent. The defense of Statute of Frauds is not available because the complaint alleges sufficient facts to constitute a constructive trust. The defense of Statute of Limitations is based on the fifteen-year statute (Civ. Prac. Act, § 34), but the affidavits do not show that the Statute of Limitations has run. A trial of the issues is required. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Breitel and Botein, JJ.