Case ID: sw3d_164/html/0141-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John LINDSAY, Appellant, v. Karen HOLLAND-COOK, Respondent.
    No. ED 84991.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    May 24, 2005.
    Brown & Crouppen, Seth S. Webb, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    DeFranco Law Firm, Cody S. Moon, O’Fallon, IL, for respondent.
    Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J. and LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J. and MARY K HOFF, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Lindsay appeals the judgment of the trial court granting a motion for a directed verdict in favor of Karen Holland-Cook.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).