Case ID: ohio-law-abs_7/html/0149-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WASHBURN, PJ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BRYAN et v FITTS et
    Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Lorain Co
    No 463.
    Decided Dec 21, 1928
    Webber & Symons, Elyria, for Bryan et.
    Baird, Vandemark & Butler, Elyria, for Fitts et. „ ’
   WASHBURN, PJ

We find that plaintiffs’ predecessor in-title dedicated to the public, as a fight of way for road purposes the part of said premises south of said line, and that the proper public authorities accepted said dedication and have a right to continue such uáe, and therefore plaintiffs are not entitled to the relief sought in their petition, and said petition is dismissed at their costs.

Funk, J, and Pardee, J, concur.