Case ID: f-appx_714/html/0982-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leysmilan RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 17-12290 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    (March 6, 2018)
    Laura Thomas Rivero, Lisa Tobin Ru-bio, Emily M. Smachetti, U.S. Attorney Service—Southern District of Florida, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Joseph A. Chambrot, Chambrot Law Office, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant
    Before WILLIAM PRYOR, ANDERSON, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Leysmilan Rodriguez appeals his 78-month sentence, imposed at the low end of the advisory guideline range, after pleading guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit health' care and wire fraud. The doctrine of invited error precludes Rodriguez from arguing that he was not an organizer or leader of this conspiracy: he agreed to recommend that the district court conclude he was an organizer or leader of the criminal activity in question. For background, see United States v. Love, 449 F.3d 1154 (11th Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.