Case ID: fla_102/html/0231-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

S. Levenson, Appellant, vs. Walter A. Dunn, Appellee.
    
    135 So. 882.
    Division B.
    Decision filed June 29, 1931.
    
      
      W. A. Pattishall, for Appellant;
    
      C. Arthur Yergey, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record and the final decree herein and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said final decree. It is therefore considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.