Case ID: f-appx_109/html/0856-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jewell SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLARK COUNTY; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 03-15723.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 13, 2004.
    
    Decided Sept. 20, 2004.
    Jewell Smith, Indian Springs, NV, pro se.
    Before: PREGERSON, T.G. NELSON, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jewell Smith, a former Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s order denying Smith’s motion to reconsider the court’s order dismissing Smith’s second amended complaint and granting leave to file a third amended complaint as to certain claims. We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s order because it was not final. See WMX Technologies, Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc) (district court order dismissing claims with leave to amend is not a final appealable order).

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.