Case ID: nj-eq_80/html/0550-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James J. Leyden, complainant-respondent, v. Elijah W. Lawrence et ux., defendants-appellants.
    [Submitted July 8th, 1912.
    Decided November 18th, 1912.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning, whose opinion is reported in 79 N. J. Bq. (9 Buck.) 113.
    
    
      Messrs. French & Bicharás, for the complainant.
    
      Mr. Austin H. Bivachhamer and Mr. John'Caiwalaáer, Jr. (of the Philadelphia bar), for the defendants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in tire opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chiee-Justicb, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Bergen, Voorhbes, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, White, Treacy —14.

For reversal—None.