Case ID: sw3d_465/html/0076-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Darryl J. WALTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 101404
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    FILED: June 30, 2015
    Srikant Chigurupati, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
    Chris Foster, Gregory L. Barnes, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for respondent.
    Before Patricia L. Cohen, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Darryl Walton (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion after an evidentiary hearing. After a jury trial, Movant was convicted of two counts of distribution of a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.211, RSMo (Cum.Supp. 2011); one count of second degree drug trafficking, in violation of Section 195.223; and one count of possession of a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.202. He was sentenced as a prior and persistent drug offender to twelve years of imprisonment on each count with all sentences to run concurrently. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).