Case ID: sw3d_504/html/0067-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stanford GREENWOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    ED 103195
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
    Filed: May 17, 2016
    Kristina Starke Olson, District Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
    Robert J. Bartholomew, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stanford Greenwood (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief, motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. . We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential valué. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).