Case ID: njl_119/html/0431-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROSE GLICKFELD, RESPONDENT, v. SYLVIA A. VENOKUR, TRADING, ETC., APPELLANT.
    Argued October 23, 1937
    Decided January 26, 1938.
    For the appellant, Fast & Fast.
    
    For the respondent, David M. Litwin and Moe A. Litwin.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bodine, Heher,' Perskie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.