Case ID: sw3d_453/html/0866-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Devin MOSLEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 100915
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    
    Filed: February 3, 2015
    Rosalind Koch, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, for Movant/Appellant.
    Richard A. Starnes, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent/Respondent.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Devin Mosley appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, following an evi-dentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b). 
      
      . All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2013, unless otherwise indicated.