Case ID: fla_150/html/0085-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "TERRELL, J.: THOMAS, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DADE REALTY CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation, v. HARRY SCHOENTHAL, and the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, and the Judges thereof.
    7 So. (2nd) 459
    March 10, 1942
    En Banc
    Patton & Kanner, and Redfearn & Ferrell, for relator.
    Harry Gordon and J. M. Flowers, for respondents.
   TERRELL, J.:

This is a companion case to Dade Realty Corporation v. Esther Schoenthal, et al., decided this date. In the latter case, we prohibited the Circuit Court of Dade County from reviewing the judgment of the County Judge in a distress for rent proceeding. In the case at bar, we are asked to prohibit the Circuit Court of Dade County from requiring the County Judge by mandamus to vacate the same judgment.

The record discloses that the ultimate question involved in both cases is identical, that review by appeal is adequate and that there is no basis shown for mandamus so the writ of prohibition is granted on authority of Dade Realty Corporation v. Esther Schoenthal, et al., decided this date.

BÚFORD, CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

BROWN, C. J., and THOMAS, J., dissent.

WHITFIELD, J., not participating.

THOMAS, J.,

dissenting:

I think this case, in mandamus, is not analogous to the one referred to as its companion and that there is no justification for interference on the part of this Court by writ of prohibition.

BROWN, C. J., concurs.