Case ID: ind_9/html/0181-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Brown v. The Newcastle and Richmond Railroad Company.
    APPEAL from the Cass Court of Common Pleas.
    
      Monday, June 1.
    
      L. Chamberlain, H. P. Biddle, and B. W. Peters, for the appellant.
    
      D. D. Pratt and S. C. Taber, for the appellees.
   Per Curiam.

In this case there was a motion for a new trial; but the evidence-is not set out in the record. There is no bill of exceptions; nor does it appear that the rulings of the Court were excepted to in any mode known to the law. There is, therefore, no point of inquiry properly before us .

The judgment is affirmed, with 10 per cent. damages and costs. 
      
       See Irwin v. Anthony, 8 Ind. R. 470; Jolly et al. v. The Terre Haute Bridge Co., post, and cases cited.