Case ID: f-appx_427/html/0333-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Antonio TYSON, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Walter REED, District Attorney; Robert C. Tanner, Warden; Louisiana State, Respondents—Appellees.
    No. 10-31162
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    June 3, 2011.
    Antonio Tyson, Angie, LA, pro se.
    
      Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Antonio Tyson, Louisiana prisoner # 331834, has filed a motion for a certificate of appealability (COA) challenging his convictions for forcible rape, armed robbery, and aggravated burglary. Tyson seeks to appeal the denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion.

To the extent that a COA is required, it is denied. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000). To the extent that a COA is not required, the district court’s judgment denying the Rule 60(b) motion is affirmed. See Bailey v. Cain, 609 F.3d 763, 767 (5th Cir.2010), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 931, 178 L.Ed.2d 774 (2011); Seven Elves, Inc. v. Eskenazi, 635 F.2d 396, 402 (5th Cir. Unit A Jan.1981). The motion for appointment of counsel is also denied. See Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep’t, 811 F.2d 260, 261-62 (5th Cir.1986) (per curiam); Schwander v. Blackburn, 750 F.2d 494, 502-03 (5th Cir.1985).

AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.