Case ID: ny_186/html/0603-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frank W. Molloy, Respondent, v. The City of New Rochelle, Appellant.
    
      Molloy v. City of New Rochelle, 110 App. Div. 895, modified.
    (Argued November 27, 1906;
    decided December 11, 1906.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 5, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new tidal in an action to recover for alleged extra work in the performance of a contract.
    
      William D. Sawyer, Corporation Counsel [Joseph T. Brown, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.
    
      L. Laffiin Kellogg and Alfred C. Petté for respondent.
   Judgment of Trial Term modified by deducting therefrom $1,630.55, and reducing the extra allowance proportionately, and as modified affirmed, without costs in this court to either party; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haigi-it, Yann and Chase, JJ. Not sitting: Willard Bartlett, J. Absent: O’Brien, J.