Case ID: conn-app_15/html/0801-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Parker Benjamin, Inc. v. New London Inn Associates et al.
    (5953)
    Spallone, Stoughton and Foti, Js.
    Argued May 19—
    decision released May 24, 1988
    
      John C. Wirzbicki, for the appellants (defendants).
    
      Glenn E. Coe, with whom, on the brief, was John J. Kindi, for the appellee (plaintiff).
   Per Curiam.

The defendant attacks the factual findings of the trial court and, in addition, challenges the trial court’s construction of the contract between the parties.

We will not retry the issues where, as here, there is ample evidence to support the factual findings; nor will we reconstrue the contract where, as here, the construction made by the trial court reveals no abuse of discretion in that it manifests a lawful, logical and reasonable interpretation of the unambiguous language of the contract.

There is no error.