Case ID: ohio-st_90/html/0406-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 13965.
    Gilbert v. Eigner.
    Decided March 24, 1914.
    Error to Circuit Court of Portage county.
    
      Messrs. Siddall & Hanselman, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Mr. C. H. Curtiss, for defendant in error.
   Judgment affirmed. See journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; upon the first error assigned by the circuit court for reversal of the judgment, to-wit: That “the court erred in sustaining questions propounded to Peter W. Eigner, as follows : What do you say as to what the usual, ordinary commission is for the sale of secondhand electric machines?’ and also, What would you say it was?’ ” This court finds from the record that no other error intervened in the trial of said cause in the common pleas court.

Johnson, Donai-iue, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.