Case ID: ne3d_120/html/0865-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE v. JONES
    2019-0187
    Supreme Court of Ohio.
    April 10, 2019
    MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING
    On review of an order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are ordered to brief the issue stated at page 1 of the court of appeals' entry filed January 11, 2019: "Where the state is permitted to exercise more than its allotted number of peremptory challenges in a criminal prosecution, does that circumstance constitute structural error requiring automatic reversal of a conviction, or is the defendant-appellant required to demonstrate that prejudice has resulted from the error?"
    The conflict case is State v. Holloway, 129 Ohio App.3d 790, 719 N.E.2d 70 (10th Dist.1998).
    KENNEDY, DEWINE, and DONNELLY, JJ., dissent.