Case ID: ad_219/html/0802-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harold Horton, Appellant, v. The Pennsylvania Exchange Bank, Respondent.
   On reargument, order granting defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, and judgment entered pursuant to such order, reversed upon the law, without costs, and motion denied, without costs, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint upon payment of costs to date. As the pleadings stand, there was no issue of fact raised and the attempt to set up an entirely different cause of action in the reply to the defendant’s counterclaim, was in fact the stating of a new cause of action inconsistent with that stated in the complaint. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.