Case ID: nys_8/html/0933-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Minto et al., Respondents, v. Bauer et al., Appellants.
    
      (Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.
    
    January 24, 1890.)
    Argued before Van Brunt, P. J., and Brady and Daniels, JJ.
    
      J. Kearney, for appellants. J. C. De la Mare, for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The appellant by bis stipulation admitted that the court would be justified in sustaining the order appealed from so far as it affects the lien of the attorney. The judgment heretofore rendered by the general term is modified so that it should affirm the order appealed from as to the attorney’s right to proceed for his agreed compensation; and the order should therefore be reversed in the other respects mentioned in the previous opinion.

On reargument. For former reports, see 6 N. Y. Supp. 444, and 7 N. Y. Supp. 950.