Case ID: f-appx_7/html/0600-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Miguel CARLOS-BANUELOS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 99-50778. D.C. No. CR-99-00354-TJW.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 12, 2001 
    
    Decided March 22, 2001.
    Before WALLACE, SILVERMAN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      . The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jose Miguel Carlos-Banuelos appeals his conviction and 37-month sentence inlposed following a guilty plea to illegal reentry by a previously deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We dismiss.

As part of his plea, Carlos-Banuelos “waive[d], to the full extent of the law, any right to appeal or collaterally attack the conviction and sentence, including any restitution order, unless the Court imposes a custodial sentence greater than the high end of the guideline range based on an adjusted offense level of 21.” Because the district court imposed the sentence based on an adjusted offense level of 20, and Carlos-Banuelos does not contend that the waiver of his right to appeal was unknowing or involuntary, the appeal waiver is enforceable. United States v. Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d 318, 319 (9th Cir.1990) (concluding that if waiver is made voluntarily and knowingly, it is enforceable and does not violated due process or public policy).

DISMISSED. 
      
      . This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.