Case ID: ad3d_124/html/0741-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Yancy Marquez, Appellant.
    [998 NYS2d 669]—
   Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Riviezzo, J.), dated October 12, 2012, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a new risk level assessment hearing and a new determination, to be preceded by notice to the defendant in accordance with Correction Law § 168-n (3).

“ ‘A sex offender facing risk level classification under the Sex Offender Registration Act (hereinafter SORA) has a due process right to be present at the SORA hearing’ ” (People v Jackson, 94 AD3d 961, 961 [2012], quoting People v Gonzalez, 69 AD3d 819, 819 [2010]; see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Phillips, 110 AD3d 1050, 1050 [2013]; People v Gutierrez-Lucero, 103 AD3d 89, 99 [2012]; People v Ginyard, 101 AD3d 1095, 1095 [2012]; People v Arrahman, 83 AD3d 680, 680 [2011]). Under the particular circumstances of this case, the defendant’s due process rights were violated when the hearing proceeded in his absence. Accordingly, we reverse the order and remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a new risk level assessment hearing and a new determination, to be preceded by notice to the defendant in accordance with Correction Law § 168-n (3).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the defendant’s remaining contentions.

Rivera, J.R, Dickerson, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.