Case ID: so2d_354/html/1242-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Raymond HOWE et al., Appellants, v. Dorothy E. HOWE, as personal representative of the Estate of Howard Howe, Deceased, Appellee.
    No. GG-42.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Feb. 7, 1978.
    Rehearing Denied March 3, 1978.
    Robert J. Gorman of Brennan, McAliley, Albury & Hayskar, Fort Pierce, for appellants.
    William E. Sherman of Landis, Graham, French, Husfeld, Sherman & Ford, P. A., DeLand, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Although the order for sale entered April 4,1977, appears not to have been predicated on an adjudication of the interests of the estate in the property that was subject to the order, the record contains indications of consent by the parties to the court’s exercise of jurisdiction over the property for certain purposes, even absent such an adjudication. The record otherwise provides an unsatisfactory basis for determination of any error in the order from which the appeal was taken. Without prejudice to proceedings for a decisive determination of the estate’s interest in the property, or for reconsideration of the appealed order in the light of subsequent events, the order is

AFFIRMED. See Fla.R.P. & G.P. 5.100; Baker v. Baker, 327 So.2d 205 (Fla.1976).

SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.