Case ID: f-appx_399/html/0848-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Viston Shyrock MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sergeant HATFIELD; T. Lowe, Iho; Sergeant Owens; Randy C. Mathena, Warden, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 10-7053.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.
    Decided Oct. 28, 2010.
    Viston Shyrock Martin, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Viston Shyrock Martin appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Hatfield, No. 7:10-cv-00262-jlk-mfu, 2010 WL 2910008 (W.D.Va. July 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.