Case ID: f-appx_327/html/0407-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John Alan MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE, AND PARDON SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 09-6251.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 18, 2009.
    Decided: June 24, 2009.
    John Alan Miller, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

John Alan Miller appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Miller v. South Carolina Dept, of Probation, Parole and Pardon Svcs., No. 2:08-cv-03836-JFA (D.S.C. Feb. 25, 2009). We deny Miller’s motion for punitive damages, his motion to impose sanctions, his motion to compel all documents and evidence, his motion for judgment, and his motion to intervene. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.