Case ID: nys_89/html/1106-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HAWLEY, Appellant, v. HAWLEY, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    June 23, 1904.)
    Action by Sarah M. Hawley against Walter L. Hawley. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. See 88 N. Y. Supp. 606.
    Raphael J. Moses, for appellant.
    Job E. Hedges, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The evidence does not disclose the agreement, alleged in the complaint, “that if plaintiff would marry him [the defendant] he would obtain and keep in force a policy of insurance on Ms life,” but at best only a sanction by the father of the plaintiff of engagement upon conditions affecting the financial capacity of the defendant, who, in a letter to the plaintiff, said: “The conditions he names are just and fair, entirely so, and I am fully confident that I shall be able to comply with all of them very soon, to his entire satisfaction.” The judgment must be affirmed. Judgment affirmed, with costs.