Case ID: br_557/html/0228-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN RE: Robert PADULA; Deborah Padula, Debtors. VPSI, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Deborah Padula, Defendant-Appellee. National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, Amicus Supporting Appellee.
    No. 15-2114
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 28, 2016
    Decided: June 9, 2016
    Heather S. Deane, Adam D. Michel, Bonner, Kiernan, Trebach' & Crociata, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. John T. Donelan, Law Office of John T. Donelan, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appel-lee. Tara Twomey, National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, J. Erick Heath, On Brief, San Jose, California, for Amicus Curiae,
    Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

VPSI, Inc., appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting the debtor’s motion for authorization to pursue a state court personal injury suit. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the courts below. See VPSI, Inc, v. Padula, No. 1:15-cv-00612-AJT-IDD (E.D. Va. Aug. 21, 2015); No. 11-12985-BFK (E.D. Va. Apr. 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED