Case ID: ohio-st-3d_59/html/0061-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State, ex rel. Carter, Appellant, v. General Tire & Rubber Company et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as State, ex rel. Carter, v. General Tire & Rubber Co. (1991), 59 Ohio St. 3d 61.]
    (No. 90-615
    Submitted February 5, 1991
    Decided April 24, 1991.)
    
      Michael J. Muldoon, for appellant.
    
      Roetzel & Andress, George A. Clark and Orlando J. Williams, for appellee General Tire & Rubber Co.
    
      Lee I. Fisher, attorney general, and Michael L. Squillace, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.
   Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in State, ex rel. Noll, v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St. 3d 203, 567 N.E. 2d 245, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and issue a limited writ returning the cause to the commission to identify the nonmedical disability factors on which it relied and to briefly explain the reasons for its decision.

Judgment reversed and limited writ issued.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.