Case ID: f2d_6/html/0709-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "ROBB, Associate Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alfred F. MASURY and August H. Leipert, Appellants, v. Harvey W. BELL, Appellee.
    (Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.
    Submitted May 13, 1925.
    Decided June 1, 1925.)
    No. 1755.
    W. A. Redding and W. B. Greeley, both of New York City, and H. H. Semmes, of Washington, D. C., for appellants.
    J. H. Milans and C. T. Milans, both of Washington, D. C., and Albert C. Nolte, of New York City (Edmund Quincy Moses, of New York City, on the brief), for appellee.
    Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.
   ROBB, Associate Justice.

The invention here is closely related to that involved in the preceding appeal, No. 1754, just decided. — App. D. C. —, 6 F.(2d) 708. The counts of this interference were originally in the other, but-on motion of the senior party the interference was dissolved as to them, and the junior parties filed another application, in which these claims were made. Since the two cases have been submitted on a single record, the conclusion reached in the preceding appeal will be controlling here, as below, and the decision therefore is affirmed.

Affirmed.