Case ID: f-appx_158/html/0513-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Clester Earlis CARTER, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
    No. 05-6301.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 22, 2005.
    Decided Dec. 29, 2005.
    Clester Earlis Carter, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    
      Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Clester Earlis Carter, a federal prisoner, appeals from the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition, which challenges the Bureau of Prisons’ computation of good time credits, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Carter v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-871-5 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 19, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED