Case ID: f-appx_141/html/0232-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard MORRIS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Patricia STANSBERY, Respondent—Appellee, and United States of America; United States Parole Commission, Respondents.
    No. 05-6432.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 17, 2005.
    Decided: Aug. 26, 2005.
    Richard Morris, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, . Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Richard Morris, a federal parolee, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Morris v. Stansbery, No. CA-04-147-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED