Case ID: so2d_518/html/0945-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The BEHRENS COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. B.D. RAWLS, et al., Appellees.
    No. 87-2363.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 29, 1987.
    Rehearing Denied Feb. 11, 1988.
    James C. Blecke, Miami, for appellant.
    Rice & Reiser, Daniels & Hicks and Patrice Talisman, Miami, Spear & Hoffman, Coral Gables, for appellees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The trial court did not err in granting the appellee’s motion for dissolution pursuant to section 607.274(l)(a)(2), Florida Statutes (1985), because the evidence clearly indicates that the shareholders are hopelessly deadlocked at present and have been so for a number of years. Accordingly, we affirm the order under review.