Case ID: f-appx_67/html/0215-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dominique Muhammad SALAAM-X, a/k/a Alfred D. Clifton, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jim PENDERGRAPH; N. Carter, Deputy Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 03-6559.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted June 12, 2003.
    Decided June 19, 2003.
    Dominique Muhammad Salaam-X, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Dominique Muhammad Salaam-X appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Salaam-X v. Pendergraph, No. CA-03-37-3-MU-02 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 2003). We deny Salaam-X’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.