Case ID: sw3d_313/html/0744-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles W. EZELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 70532.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    July 6, 2010.
    Laura G. Martin, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
    Jayne T. Woods, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, C.J., JAMES EDWARD WELSH, and GARY D. WITT, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Charles W. Ezell appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Ezell asserts that trial counsel was ineffective for causing the introduction of damaging credibility evidence.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).