Case ID: f-appx_44/html/0277-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Keith THOMAS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Charles D. MARSHALL, Warden; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 00-15312.
    D.C. No. CV-00-00142-TEH.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted Aug. 12, 2002.
    
    Decided Aug. 16, 2002.
    Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Keith Thomas, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing without leave to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging that officials at Pelican Bay State Prison violated his constitutional rights by reading his outgoing non-legal mail. We review de novo dismissals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm.

We conclude that the district court properly dismissed Thomas’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.