Case ID: ga-app_31/html/0163-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodwortii, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

15005.
    Toney v. The State.
    Decided November 14, 1923.
    Indictment for possession of liquor; from Fulton superior court —Judge Shurley (motion for new trial before Judge Humphries). August 8, 1923.
    
      G. G. Battle, for plaintiff in error.
    
      John A. Boyhin, solicitor-general, B. A. Stephens, contra.
   Bloodwortii, J.

1. Under all the facts of the case, there is no merit in any of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.

2. There is ample evidence to support the verdict, which is approved by the judge who tried the case; and, as no error of law was committed, this court is powerless to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.