Case ID: so2d_453/html/0932-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Samuel HALL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 83-556.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Aug. 14, 1984.
    
      Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Sharon B. Jacobs, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Renee E. Rus-ka, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARK-DULL and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s convictions of robbery and aggravated assault are affirmed. Rose v. State, 425 So.2d 521 (Fla.1983); Welty v. State, 402 So.2d 1159 (Fla.1981); Spinkellink v. State, 313 So.2d 666 (Fla. 1975); Machado v. State, 363 So.2d 1132 (Fla.3d DCA 1978). However, the minimum-mandatory three-year sentences, pursuant to the provisions of Section 775.-087(2) Florida Statutes (1981), should have been ordered to be served concurrently. Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983); Parson v. State, 450 So.2d 924 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Whitehead v. State, 446 So.2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

Therefore the convictions are affirmed and the sentences are affirmed except as modified by this opinion to make the minimum-mandatory three-year sentences run concurrently rather than consecutively.

Affirmed as modified.