Case ID: ad3d_88/html/1295-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Memorandum:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donald W. Gavenda, Jr., Also Known as Donald Gavenda and Another, Appellant.
    [930 NYS2d 393]
   Memorandum:

On appeal from a judgment convicting him of felony driving while intoxicated (DWI) (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3]; § 1193 [1] [c] [former (i)]), defendant contends that County Court erred in refusing to suppress all evidence obtained when he was stopped at a DWI checkpoint and thereafter arrested. According to defendant, the DWI checkpoint constituted an unreasonable seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and article I, § 12 of the New York Constitution. We reject that contention. The court properly determined that the roadblock jointly conducted by the Genesee County Sheriffs Department and the Batavia Police Department to detect persons who were driving while intoxicated was a constitutionally permissible seizure (see People v LaFountain, 283 AD2d 1013 [2001]; see generally People v Scott, 63 NY2d 518 [1984]). Defendant’s vehicle was stopped “pursuant to a nonarbitrary, nondiscriminatory and uniform procedure, involving the stop of all vehicles” approaching the roadblock (People v John BB., 56 NY2d 482, 488 [1982], cert denied 459 US 1010 [1982]). Moreover, all of the police personnel involved were given explicit verbal instructions on the procedures to be used at the roadblock, including the nature of the questions to be asked of every driver, and those instructions “afforded little discretion to [the] personnel” (Scott, 63 NY2d at 526). Present — Fahey, J.P, Peradotto, Bindley, Sconiers and Green, JJ.