Case ID: f-appx_22/html/0288-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CERES CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. DARRYL LeDUCE; ITO Corporation of Baltimore; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents.
    No. 01-1810.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 30, 2001.
    Decided Dec. 19, 2001.
    Lawrence P. Postol, Seyfarth Shaw, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Michael C. Eisenstein, Baltimore, Maryland; Christopher J. Field, Field, Womack & KawczynsM, L.L.C., South Amboy, New Jersey, for Respondents.
    Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Ceres Corporation seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of longshore benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.2001) and holding that Ceres is the responsible employer. Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See LeDuce v. Ceres Corp., No. 00—839; 00-839-A (BRB May 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.