Case ID: okla-crim_7/html/0702-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. M McNEIL v. STATE.
    No. A-1334.
    Opinion Filed February 3, 1912.
    Appeal from Canadian County Court; W. A. Maurer, Judge.
    J. M. McNeil was convicted of violating the prohibitory law, and appeals.
    Affirmed. ■
    Eoberson & Roberson, for plaintiff in error.
    Smith C. Matson and E. G. Spilman, Asst. Attys. Gen., for the State.
   PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted on the 1st day of May, 1911, in the county court of Canadian .county, on a charge of unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquor from one place to another in this state, and on the 29th day of said month was sentenced to pay a fine of four hundred dollars and be imprisoned in the county jail for a period of ninety days. After a careful examination of the record in this ease we think the judgment should be affirmed under the doctrine announced in the case of Clarence Maynes v. State, 6 Okla. Cr. 487, 119 Pac. 644. It is so ordered.