Case ID: sw3d_482/html/0466-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Raymond J. NIXON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 103109
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    FILED: February 16, 2016
    Erika Renee Eliason, 1000 W. Nifong, Bldg. 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Colette Elaine Neuner, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102; ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT
    Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Roy L. Richter, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Raymond J. Nixon appeals from the motion court’s entry of judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Rule 24.035 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal ‘file, and the record on appeal and find the claim of error' to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting1 the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).