Case ID: nj-eq_138/html/0479-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Roland Tidaback et al., appellants, v. Ruth R. Rude, respondent.
    [Submitted May 31st, 1946.
    Decided September 13th, 1946.]
    
      Messrs. Ward & McGinnis and Mr. Louis G. Friedman (Mr. Peter J. McGinnis, of counsel), for the appellants.
    
      Messrs. Morris, Downing •& Sherred (Mr. Willis H. Sherred, of counsel), for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported at 138 N. J. Eq. 59.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Colie, Oliphant, Waohenfeld, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, McLean, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.