Case ID: nys_75/html/1128-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LEVINE v. GOLDSMITH et al.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    April 11, 1902.)
    Suit by Julius Levine against Gustavus A. Goldsmith and others. On motion for new trial at appellate division upon exceptions after interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiff, pursuant to Code Civ. Proc. § 1001. Motion granted. See 69 N. Y. Supp. 446. Edmond A. Wise, for appellants. Elek John Ludvigh, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in the ease of Levine v. Goldsmith (decided herewith) 75 N. Y. Supp. 706, the exceptions should be sustained, the interlocutory judgment reversed, the decision and order of ■reference vacated, and a new trial granted, with costs to defendant to abide event.