Case ID: so2d_699/html/0842-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WHUD REAL ESTATE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Delaware limited partnership; and General Electric Capital Corporation, a New York corporation, Appellants, v. OAK GROVE, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, By and Through its general partners, Burton R. KASSELL and the Palindrome Corporation, Appellee.
    No. 97-755.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 1, 1997.
    Mattlin & McClosky, and Gregg W. McClosky, and Michael J. Ioannou, and David J. Pascuzi, Boca Raton, for appellants.
    Scharlin, Lanzetta, Cohen, Cobb & Ebin and Lewis R. Cohen, Miami, for appellee.
    Before GODERICH, GREEN and SORONDO, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We cannot conclude on the record before us that the lower court’s refusal to compel the appellee’s deposit of rents into the court’s registry pending final adjudication was a clear abuse of discretion granted under section 697.07(4), Florida Statutes (1995). Nor can we find error in the court’s denial of an assignment of the rents to the appellants pursuant to section 697.07(3) where the court correctly determined that there was a bona fide dispute between the parties as to whether the appellee was in default of the mortgage. Accordingly, we affirm the non-final order under review.

Affirmed.