Case ID: ga-app_88/html/0199-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Worrill, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

34353, 34354.
    Rowe v. Johnson; and vice versa.
    
    Decided April 22, 1953
    Rehearing denied May 13, 1953.
    
      John Henry Poole, for plaintiff in'error.......
    
      John T. Ferguson, contra.
   Worrill, J.

1. An order sustaining certain special demurrers to the peti tion and limiting the action to one arising ex contractu, which left the suit pending in the lower court, was not a final judgment from which a direct bill of exceptions would lie. Harrell v. Southern Ry. Co., 13 Ga. App. 409 (79 S. E. 240); Woodland v. Woodland, 33 Ga. App. 167 (125 S. E. 732); Joyner v. Hamilton, 79 Ga. App. 106 (53 S. E. 2d 133); Fickett v. Fuller, 171 Ga. 190 (154 S. E. 784). The main bill of exceptions was, therefore prematurely sued out, and must be dismissed.

2. Where the cross-bill of exceptions was not tendered within twenty days from the date of the order complained of, even though such order would have been a final order had it been rendered as contended by the plaintiff in error in such cross-bill, but was tendered within the time allowed by law for cross-bills of exceptions, it came too late to be treated as a main bill of exceptions, and since the main bill of exceptions has been dismissed, the cross-bill must likewise be dismissed. Perdue v. Anderson, 137 Ga. 512 (2) (73 S. E. 1050).

Main bill and cross-bill of exceptions dismissed.

Sutton, C. J., and Felton, J., concur.