Case ID: so2d_693/html/0625-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David POWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 95-03829.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 26, 1997.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and A. Victoria Wiggins, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

David Powell appeals his conviction and sentence for grand theft in violation of section 812.014, Florida Statutes (1993). We affirm Powell’s conviction without discussion, but strike court costs of $250 imposed as part of his sentence because the trial court failed to orally pronounce or cite supportive statutory authority for the costs. See Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Brown v. State, 506 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 515 So.2d 229 (Fla.1987).

On remand, the state may seek to have the costs reimposed with reference to the appropriate statutory authority. Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and QUINCE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.