Case ID: so2d_568/html/0873-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "McMillan, judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Shane Earl HALL v. STATE.
    8 Div. 291.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    March 16, 1990.
    Rehearing Denied June 29, 1990.
   AFTER REMAND FROM THE ALA-BAM A SUPREME COURT

McMillan, judge.

In accordance with Ex parte Hall, 557 So.2d 22 (Ala.1990), and Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255, 109 S.Ct. 1038, 103 L.Ed.2d 308 (1989), it is determined that this cause was affirmed without opinion because the issues raised by the appellant concerning the voluntariness of his statements and their admission into evidence without a hearing outside of the jury’s presence were procedurally barred because there were no objections in circuit court.

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.