Case ID: f-appx_610/html/0962-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Edward CURRY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 14-15608
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    July 29, 2015.
    Robert G. Davies, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, Pamela C. Marsh, Francis Todd Williams, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Gainesville, FL, Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Chet Kaufman, Darren James Johnson, Randolph Patterson Murrell, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before MARTIN, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Randolph Murrell and Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Michael Edward Curry, have filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsels’ assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent review of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels’ motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Curry’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.