Case ID: f-appx_17/html/0703-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

T. RASP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUPERIOR/REINHARDT INSURANCE CO., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 00-56227.
    D.C. No. CV-00-603-NAJ/JAH.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 13, 2001.
    
    Decided Aug. 30, 2001.
    Before HAWKINS, TASHIMA, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

T. Rasp appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing her action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. Virgin v. San Luis Obispo, 201 F.3d 1141, 1142 (9th Cir.2000) (per curiam).

We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order entered on June 1, 2000.

Rasp’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.