Case ID: fla_112/html/0524-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Tampa Electric Co. v. J. D. Davis.
    150 So. 728.
    Division B.
    Opinion Filed October 31, 1933.
    
      Knight, Thompson & Turner, for Plaintiff in Error.
    
      Barber & Williams, for Defendant in Error.
   Per Curiam.

This cause having been submitted from the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given, in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the judgment of - the circuit court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.