Case ID: so2d_814/html/0516-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas C. KEARNS, Appellant, v. 8911 NORMANDY BEACH, INC., Appellee.
    No. 3D01-1212.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 24, 2002.
    Stratton & Feinstein, and Douglas D. Stratton, Miami, Beach, for appellant.
    Phillips, Eisinger, Koss, Rothstein & Rosenfeldt, and Jed L. Frankel, Hollywood, for appellee.
    Before COPE, LEVY, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See The Florida Bar v. Joy, 679 So.2d 1165, 1167 (Fla.1996) (citing United Am. Bank of Cent. Fla., Inc. v. Seligman, 599 So.2d 1014, 1016 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)), (“In the absence of an express agreement, written or oral, the law will imply from the circumstances of the escrow that the agent has undertaken a legal obligation (l).to know the provisions and conditions of the principal agreement concerning the escrowed property, and (2) to exercise reasonable skill and ordinary diligence in holding and delivering possession of the escrowed property (i.e., to disburse the escrowed funds) in strict accordance with the principals’ agreement.”).