Case ID: f-appx_607/html/0311-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John Alexander WAGNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John S. BEACHY; Brandon R. Self; Sergeant Jamie C. Farris; Dean W. Rounds, Jr.; Leroy A. Conrad, II; Gary D. Maynard; Roderick Sowers; Jesse Ballard, III; Keith Arnold; Corporal Walker; Sergeant Gillium; Sergeant Janet Puffenbarger; Sergeant Jamie Farris; Gregory R. Shaffer; Corporal Adams; R. Logston; Kristy Cortez; Collin Ottey; Wexford Health Sources, Inc.; William S. Bohrer, Chief of Security; Lieutenant George B. McCalpine; Major Garland; Major Presgraves; Captain Robert Friend, Sergeant; Major Thomas Mellot; Sergeant Walter E. Iser, Sr.; Corporal Parsons; Corporal Turner; Corporal Crowe; Corporal A. Preston; Corporal Christopher; Lieutenant Bradley; S. Caple; Sergeant Brandon; Brian E. Fan; Corporal Sharon; Sergeant Gordon; Sergeant G. Forney; Corporal J. Crites; Corporal Engleson; Corporal Preston; Jesse L. Lambert, III; Sergeant Roach; Justin Gordon; Lieutenant Bradley Wilt; Christopher Preston; Nurse Autumn Durst; Janice Gilmore; William Beeman; J. Michael Stouffer; Tiffany Bennett, Defendants-Appellees, and Corporal Toby W. Tasker, Defendant.
    No. 15-6456.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 18, 2015.
    Decided: June 23, 2015.
    John Alexander Wagner, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas E. Dernoga, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; Elizabeth Erin Pavlick, Carolyn Israel Stein, Bonner, Kiernan, Trebach & Corciata, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
    Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Alexander Wagner seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing some, but not all Defendants, and granting partial summary judgment to those Defendants in this action filed .under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Wagner seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.