Case ID: ny_224/html/0602-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edward J. Backenstos, Respondent, v. Celia A. Holmes, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
    
      Backenstos v. Holmes, 183 App. Div. 908, appeal dismissed.
    (Argued September 30, 1918;
    decided October 8, 1918.)
    Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 15, 1918, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to recover a balance alleged to be due upon a stock trading account.
    The motion was made upon the grounds that the exceptions were frivolous and raised no question for review by the Court of Appeals.
    
      Joseph M. Gazzam for motion.
    
      O. B. Thomas opposed.
   Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.