Case ID: nys_26/html/1133-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JACOBS et al. v. HOWARD INS. CO. OF NEW YORK.
    (Superior Court of New York City, General Term.
    December 29, 1893.)
    Action by Julius Jacobs and George Easton against the Howard Insurance Company of New York.
    Argued before FREEDMAN, McADAM, and GILDERSLEEVE, JJ.
    Hatch & Wickes, for appellants.
    T. Henry Dewey, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The case seems to have been carefully tried and considered by the learned referee, and the judgment directed by him must, for the reasons assigned in his opinion, be affirmed, with costs. The allowance-granted by the special term judge was within the statutory limit, so that there was no abuse of power; neither was there any abuse of discretion;, hence the order must likewise be affirmed, with costs.