Case ID: sw2d_867/html/0717-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

R. BEUC ARCHITECTS, INC., Respondent, v. Richard NEMETH and Betty C. Nemeth, Appellants.
    No. 63159.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Dec. 28, 1993.
    Theodore Dennis Dealing, Clayton, for appellants.
    Jill S. Bollwerk, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and SIMON and PUDLOWSKI, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Richard and Betty Nemeth, appeal from the trial court’s order entered in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County granting respondent’s, R. Beuc Architects, Inc.’s, motion for new trial. We affirm.

The action of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. In addition, no error of law appears. As we find an opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the trial court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).