Case ID: how-pr_11/html/0576-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SUPERIOR COURT.
    The Republic of Mexico agt. Francisco de Arrangois, Bartolomi Blanco and Ramon Palanca.
    
      General Term,
    
      Dec., 1855.
    Before Oakley, Ch. J., Duer, Campbell and Hoffman, Justices.
   This case, decided at special term by Hoffman, Justice, reported ante page 1, affirmed by the court.

ERRATUM. In the case of The New-York and Erie Bank agt. Robert Codd, on page 224, in the 2d paragraph from the bottom, and in the 3d line from the beginning, after the word “ appeal,” read as follows: “ from an order at special term denying a motion to set aside an attachment issued by a judge at chambers. It was then held, that the plaintiff might read further affidavits at the special term in answer to the defendant’s moving affidavits, and for the purpose of sustaining the attachment. “In White and others agt. Featherstonhaugh, decided at special term in Dec., 1851, (7 How. Pr. R( 375,) a motion was made to set aside an attachment upon affidavits tending ”  
    ERRATUM. In the case of The New-York and Erie Bank agt. Robert Codd, on page 224, in the 2d paragraph from the bottom, and in the 3d line from the beginning, after the word “ appeal,” read as follows: “ from an order at special term denying a motion to set aside an attachment issued by a judge at chambers. It was then held, that the plaintiff might read further affidavits at the special term in answer to the defendant’s moving affidavits, and for the purpose of sustaining the attachment. “In White and others agt. Featherstonhaugh, decided at special term in Dec., 1851, (7 How. Pr. R( 375,) a motion was made to set aside an attachment upon affidavits tending ”