Case ID: sw2d_862/html/0523-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jeffrey BELL, Appellant. Jeffrey BELL, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    Nos. 62099, 63887.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Oct. 12, 1993.
    Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Jeffrey Bell, appeals from his conviction, after a jury trial for possession of a controlled substance. He was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to imprisonment for twenty years. Defendant also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion regarding defendant’s direct appeal. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

The judgment of the trial court denying defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).