Case ID: mo-app_147/html/0074-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "REYNOLDS, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. J. BICK, Appellant, v. CLARA UMSTADTT et al., Respondents.
    St. Louis Court of Appeals,
    February 21, 1910.
    JUDGMENTS: Bick v. Dixon Followed. The facts being the same as in Bick v. Dixon, ante, that case is followed.
    Appeal from Monroe Circuit Conrt. — Hon. David H. Ebij, Judge.
    Affirmed.
    
      Peter T. Barrett and Abe Lowenhaupt, of counsel; J. J. Bide, appellant, pro se.
    
    
      J. H. Whitecotton for respondent.
   REYNOLDS, P. J.

The facts in this case, so far as relate to the issue of scire facias on a judgment in a case between the parties in this case and an appeal pending on it, and the motion to quash heard on stipulation,, all being, save as to parties, as in the case of Bick v. Dixon, on the authority of the decision in that case, the judgment in this case is affirmed.

All concur.