Case ID: sw3d_506/html/0393-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Laron CRENSHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    ED104103
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: December 27, 2016
    Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Laron Crenshaw appeals from a denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).