Case ID: f-appx_405/html/0736-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michelle Johnson BAH; Mountaga Bah, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK NA, Defendant—Appellee, and HSBC Bank USA; Department of the Treasury; Real Time Resolutions, Incorporated; Wells Fargo Bank West N.A.; Hud, Defendants.
    No. 09-2217.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 9, 2010.
    Decided: Dec. 22, 2010.
    Mary E. Goulet, Whitham, Curtis, Christofferson & Cook, P.C., Reston, Virginia, for Appellants. Amy S. Owen, Elizabeth S. Finberg, Cochran & Owen, L.L.C., Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michelle Johnson Bah and Mountaga Bah appeal from the district court’s order dismissing their civil action, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), in which they sought to prevent foreclosure proceedings against their home. We have reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bah v. Wells Fargo Bank NA, No. 8:08-cv-03429-RWT (D.Md. Sept. 23, 2009). We deny the Appellee’s motion to strike and for sanctions, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.