Case ID: sw2d_939/html/0060-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert W. STROUSE, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Nanette M. STROUSE, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. 70156.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Feb. 25, 1997.
    Nathan S. Cohen, Clayton, for petitioner/appellant.
    Charles E. Bridges, St. Charles, for re-spondeni/respondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from the dissolution decree entered on January 1, 1996. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).