Case ID: ohio-app-3d_64/html/0228-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LANGSAM, Appellant, v. TINDERA, Appellee.
    [Cite as Langsam v. Tindera (1990), 64 Ohio App.3d 228.]
    Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County.
    No. 57812.
    Decided Jan. 22, 1990.
    
      
      Thomas A. Sampliner, for appellant.
    
      James M. Tindera, pro se.
    
   Per Curiam.

We dismiss as moot the plaintiffs appeal. In his single assignment of error, the plaintiff claims that the trial court erred in failing to file findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Civ.R. 52. The record reveals that the trial court filed those requested findings of fact and conclusions of law on June 14, 1989. The trial court retained jurisdiction to make findings of fact and conclusions of law despite the fact that the appeal may have already been filed. Cf. App.R. 9(E); John G. Johnson & Sons Constr. Co. v. A-T-O, Inc. (Sept. 1, 1983), Cuyahoga App. No. 44900, unreported, 1983 WL 4673.

Since there is no issue before this court for review, we hereby dismiss the plaintiffs appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Ann McManamon, C.J., Krupansky and John F. Corrigan, JJ., concur.