Case ID: ga_68/html/0831-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

McMichael, administratrix, vs. Hardee.
    1. Where the verdict and judgment were for a given principal with $261.03 interest, and the execution stated the interest as $261.00, the variance was immaterial, and was not sufficient to warrant the rejection of the fi.fa. from evidence.
    2. A suit having been brought by a surviving partner, judgment rendered, and execution issued in his favor, but the process attached to the declaration having stated the case in the name of the firm, on the trial of a claim case arising under levy of the ft. fa., the entry of suggestion of death and order that the case proceed in the name of the surviving partner, could be entered nunc pro iunc.
    
    
      (a.) This question having been submitted to the court both on the law and facts, in the absence of anything to show the contrary, we will presume that fie had satisfactory evidence before him that the suggestion had been made and the order granted at the proper time, . but not entered on the minutes.
    Speer, Justice.