Case ID: mont_281/html/0103-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. Russell Rex VanKirk, Defendant.
    NO. ADC 95-156
    DECISION
   On December 7, 1995, it was ordered that for the offense of Deliberate Homicide, a felony, the defendant is sentenced to Montana State Prison for a period of 100 years. It is further ordered that for use of a weapon in the commission of an offense, the defendant is sentenced to Montana State Prison for a period of 10 years. The foregoing sentences shall run consecutively to each other. The defendant is denied eligibility for parole or suspended release, pursuant to Section 46-18-202, MCA. The reasons for the foregoing sentence are that the defendant committed a brutal, savage crime, he left the victim in a field, and he presents a danger to society.

On August 22, 1996, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Defendant was present and was represented by Attorney Dennis Loveless. The state was represented by Mike McGrath, County Attorney of Lewis & Clark County.

Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division provides: "The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive." (Section 45-18-904(3), MCA.) The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 22nd day of August, 1996.

DATED this 16th day of September, 1996.

Chairman, Hon. Ted O. Lympus

Member, Hon. Wm. Neis Swandal

Alternate Member, Hon. Robert Boyd

The Sentence Review Board wishes to thank Attorney Dennis Loveless for representing Russell VanKirk in this matter and also Mike McGrath, County Attorney of Lewis & Clark County, for representing the State.