Case ID: nj-misc_3/html/0551-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

EDISON FIXTURE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LOUIS LAZAR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Argued May 5, 1925
    Decided May 19, 1925.
    On appeal from the District Court.
    Before Justices Parker, Mtnturn and Black.
    Eor the appellant, Herman B. J. W eclcsiein.
    
    For the respondent, Charles II. Boemer.
    
   Per Curiam.

This suit was brought in the Passaic District Court to recover the balance due of $14.80 on a written contract. The case was tried by the judge without a jury, resulting in a judgment for the defendant.

The case is controlled by the case of Edison Fixture Co., Inc., v. Copoulos, 3 N. J. Adv. R. (at p. 174); 127 Atl. Rep. 551. In that case, it was said we are unable to find any evidence justifying the judgment. So, in the present case.

The judgment is reversed and a venire de novo awarded.