Case ID: so2d_460/html/0575-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Wiley R. REYNOLDS, III, Appellant, v. TEETERS BROTHERS CONTRACTING COMPANY, d/b/a Teeters Brothers, Inc., Appellee.
    No. 83-2093.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Dec. 19, 1984.
    
      Charles C. Chillingworth of Chilling-worth & Axelrod, P.A., Palm Beach, for appellant.
    J. Michael Burman and Gary Russo of Slawson & Burman Law Offices, North Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Upon examination and review of the record we find that there is competent substantial evidence to support the trial court’s findings both as to the issue of rescission and the amount of any claims due one party from the other. Having made such a determination, we are without authority to disturb the rulings of the trial court challenged on appeal, regardless of our own views on the issues. Horn & Hardart, Florida, Inc. v. Dietz, 417 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

ANSTEAD, C.J., and DOWNEY . and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.