Case ID: so2d_626/html/0314-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marshall BANKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-3027.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Nov. 10, 1993.
    
      Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Robert Freidman, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, arid Dawn S. Wynn, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The written order of the trial court indicates that the defendant’s probation was revoked because he violated four of its terms. The court actually dismissed three of the alleged violations and announced that, the only condition breached was the one requiring him to file monthly reports. We therefore reverse the order and instruct that on remand the trial court conform the written order to its oral pronouncement.

REVERSED.

DELL, C.J., and STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.