Case ID: sw2d_861/html/0201-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cornell ALLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 63931.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Sept. 21, 1993.
    John Klosterman, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24-035 motion as untimely. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5).

Further, we find an opinion in this case would have no precedential value and affirm by summary order. Rule 84.16(b). We have provided a memorandum to the parties for their use only.