Case ID: wash_76/html/0699-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 11314.
    Department Two.
    November 15, 1913.]
    New England National Bank, Appellant, v. H. O. Drewery et al., Respondents.
      
    
    Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurston county, Mitchell, J., entered November 8, 1911, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendants, in an action on contract.
    Affirmed.
    
      George H. Funk, for appellant.
    
      Thos. M. "Vance and H. L. Parr, for respondents.
    
      
       Reported in 136 Pac. 1199.
    
   Per Curiam.

An examination of the record in this case discloses that it is identical with National Bank of Commerce v. Drewery, 70 Wash. 577, 127 Pac. 102, the note here sued upon being a second note given in the same transaction there referred to. Both cases raise the same issues upon like law and facts, resulting in like judgments. The only difference between the cases is in the party plaintiff and in the witnesses relied upon by plaintiff to sustain its cause of action. The witnesses are different, but the essential facts are the same. For this reason we do not deem it necessary or helpful to discuss the appeal farther, as all the points now suggested were urged and disposed of in the action upon the first note.

The judgment is affirmed.