Case ID: cust-ct_32/html/0514-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Lawrence, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 58139.
    protest 174907-K (New York).
    Ira Furman Co. v. United States,
   Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the merchandise in controversy is metal scrap, to wit, nonferrous metal scrap containing nickel, copper, and zinc, and articles of which nonferrous metal is the component material in chief value; that the material is secondhand, waste, or refuse; and that it is obsolete, defective, or damaged and is fit only to be remanufactured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.