Case ID: so2d_767/html/0523-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carlos MANDRI, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D99-1367.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 5, 2000.
    Order Granting Motion for Certification and Denying Rehearing Sept. 13, 2000.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Lisa Walsh, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Paulette R. Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before LEVY, GERSTEN and SHEVIN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING/CERTIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We deny defendant’s motion for rehearing. We grant defendant’s motion to certify the following question of great public importance:

WHERE A TRIAL COURT FAILS TO FILE WRITTEN REASONS IN SUPPORT OF A GUIDELINES DEPARTURE SENTENCE BUT, THEREAFTER, IN RESPONSE TO A FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.800(B) MOTION FILED BY DEFENDANT, DOES FILE WRITTEN REASONS JUSTIFYING THE DEPARTURE, IS DEFENDANT ENTITLED TO A REVERSAL AND A REMAND FOR A GUIDELINES SENTENCE, UNDER MADDOX v. STATE, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000)?

Question certified.