Case ID: nj-eq_110/html/0461-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Camden Mortgage Guaranty and Title Company et al., respondents, v. Elizabeth K. Haines, appellant.
    [Submitted February 12th, 1932.
    Decided May 16th, 1932.]
    
      
      Messrs. French, Richards & Bradley, for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. Blealcly, Stoclcwell & Burling, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning, which rests upon the reasoning of the ease of Camden Mortgage Guaranty and Title Co. v. Borton, above set out.

.For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Van Bus•kiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.