Case ID: sw3d_43/html/0460-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Steven M. TRUST, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 78310.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    April 17, 2001.
    Edward S. Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR. and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Steven Trust, pled guilty to violating section 195.211, RSMo 2000, sale of a controlled substance, and section 195.202, RSMo 2000, misdemeanor possession of a controlled substance. He now appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).