Case ID: sw3d_435/html/0089-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rodney FOSTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 100374.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    June 30, 2011.
    Amy Faerber, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Dora A. Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    
      Before: ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, C.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J., and GARY A. KAMP, S.J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rodney Foster (Movant) appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Mo. R.Crim. P. 29.15 (2013). We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2013).