Case ID: ad_110/html/0866-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Walter E. Park, Respondent, v. Edith Park, Appellant.
    Appeal from an order.denying'a motion for leave to renew an application to,interpose,a supplemental answer.
   Per Curiam:

Considering the nature of the action, we think that the defendant should be allowed to serve a supplemental an'swer. The fact that She did not make, the affidavit is explained by her absence in Europe, sick. The order appealed from should be reversed and the motion granted. Present — O’Brien, P. J., Patterson (dissenting), Ingraham, Laughlin and Clarke, JJ. Order reversed and motion