Case ID: misc2d_19/html/0958-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Samuel Breiter & Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Ward La France Truck Corp. et al., Respondents.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    June 18, 1959.
    
      Joseph Schwartsman and Benedict Ginsberg for appellant.
    
      Emanuel Luria for Ward La France Truck Corp., respondent.
   Per Curiam.

An entry in the records of a defendant showing the amount of a trade-in allowance in a transaction is not admissible, under section 374-a of the Civil Practice Act, as against third persons, to establish the reasonable value of the article traded in.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.

Concur — Steuer, J. P., Hofstadter and Aurelio, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.