Case ID: ad_269/html/0984-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jack P. Friedman, Doing Business under the Name of Central Electric Alarms, Appellant, v. Elsie Halpern et al., Copartners, Doing Business under the Name of Triboro Burglar Alarm Co., Respondents.
    (Appeal No. 2.)
   In an action to restrain the violation of a covenant against engaging in certain business in a specified area, plaintiff appeals from an order granting defendants’ motion to preclude, unless a bill of particulars in compliance with an earlier order therefor be served within twenty days. Appeal dismissed as academic, with $10 costs and disbursements to respondents, as it appears that a bill of particulars in compliance with the order of preclusion was served by plaintiff prior to his taking the appeal therefrom. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Cars-well, Johnston and Lewis, JJ., concur.