Case ID: f-appx_19/html/0663-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re: Raymond A. EDELMAN and Margaret W. Edelman, Debtors. Raymond A. Edelman, Appellant-Appellant, v. Arnold L. Kupetz, Chapter 7 Trustee; et al., Appellees-Appellees.
    No. 01-55001.
    BAP No. CC-99-01834-RiPMo.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 10, 2001 .
    Decided Sept. 24, 2001.
    
      Before HUG, PREGERSON, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       Because we unanimously find this case suitable for decision without oral argument, we deny Edelman’s request for oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Raymond Edelman appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) decision affirming the bankruptcy court’s denial of his homestead exemption claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the BAP’s legal conclusions and review for clear error the BAP’s factual determinations, McClellan Fed. Credit Union v. Parker (In re Parker), 139 F.3d 668, 670 (9th Cir.1998), and we affirm for the reasons stated in the BAP’s memorandum disposition filed November 28, 2000.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.