Case ID: f-appx_668/html/0860-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mohammed BAH, a.k.a. Little, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-13271 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Date Filed: 08/29/2016
    Phyllis Clerk, Stephanie Gabay-Smith, John Andrew Horn, Lawrence R. Sommer-feld, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Mohammed Bah, Pro Se
    Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Michael J. Trost, appointed counsel for Mohammed Bah in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bah’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Bah’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED AS MOOT.