Case ID: sc_223/html/0088-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

16712
    HOBBS v. HUDGENS ET AL.
    
    (74 S. E. (2d) 425)
    
      
      Messrs. Carlisle, Brown & Carlisle, of Spartanburg, and Love, Thornton & Blythe, of Greenville, for Appellant,
    
    
      
      Messrs. Thos. B. Butler, of Spartanburg, and /. D. Todd, Jr., of Greenville, for Respondents,
    
    
      February 4, 1953.
   PER CURIAM.

We are of opinion that the order of the trial Judge granting the motion of the defendants-respondents for judgment in their favor, non obstante veredicto, and from which this appeal is taken, should be affirmed.

Affirmed.