Case ID: f-appx_141/html/0139-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ted Aaron McCRACKEN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Joseph M. NATALE, Defendant—Appellee, and John Doe, Defendant.
    No. 05-1200.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted July 29, 2005.
    Decided Aug. 8, 2005.
    Ted Aaron McCracken, Appellant Pro Se. Robert C. Ekstrand, Ekstrand & Ekstrand, L.L.P., Durham, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Ted Aaron McCracken appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge granting defendant Natale’s motion for summary judgment, and imposing sanctions under Fed.R.CivJP. 11. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McCracken v. Natale, No. CA-04-50-5 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 2, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.