Case ID: f-appx_691/html/0080-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Qualo Martez LOWERY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 17-6090
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 25, 2017
    Decided: May 31, 2017
    Qualo Martez Lowery, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, Kevin Zolot, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Qualo Martez Lowery appeals the district court’s order denying his postconviction motion to dismiss both the indictment and the information filed by the Government pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 851 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Lowery’s motion for the appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lowery, No. 3:05-cr-00216-RJC-2 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 17, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED