Case ID: f-appx_303/html/0419-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Fred A. WHITAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 08-16876.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 1, 2008.
    
    Filed Dec. 10, 2008.
    Fred A. Whitaker, Oakland, CA, pro se.
    Thomas A. Blake, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Offiee of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: GOODWIN, CLIFTON and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

A review of the record and appellant’s response to the court’s order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment and the order denying appellant’s motion for reconsideration.

Appellant’s request for oral argument is denied.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.