Case ID: nys_11/html/0823-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Kennedy, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dasey v. Skinner et al.
    
    
      (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.
    
    September 20, 1890.)
    Case submitted on agreed statement wherein Timothy Dasey was plaintiff, and William Skinner and others, water commissioners oí the village oí Little Falls, were defendants.
    Argued before Kennedy, Martin, and Merwin, JJ.
    
      McEvoy & Jones, for plaintiff. J. D. Beckwith and A. M. Mills, for defendants.
   Kennedy, J.

This, like the preceding case, (ante, 821,) comes here on a statement of facts agreed upon, and with one exception is the same. It appears that the plaintiff was given a day for hearing by, and that he appeared before, the commissioners, and presented his objections to the levy of the tax. It cannot, therefore, be urged that his property was taken without due process of law. The tax was for water-rates accruing subsequent to the passage of chapter 507 of the Laws of 1889. The complaint herein is, therefore, dismissed upon the merits, but without costs. All concur.