Case ID: nys_109/html/1128-14.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

EHRET, Respondent, v. BROWN, Appellant. SAME v. WELLS.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    March 20, 1908.)
    Appeal from Special Term. Actions by George Ehret against Willard Brown and Charles W. Wells. From orders striking out parts - of the answer as irrelevant, defendants appeal. Orders modified.
    Frank E. Smith, for appellants. Frederic W. Hinrichs, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

So much of the orders appealed from as requires the caption of the second separate defense to add the words “and not as a counterclaim” should be stricken out. As so modified, the orders should he affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the respondent on each appeal.