Case ID: nj-misc_1/html/0284-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HARRY R. SHAW, PLAINTIFF, v. JOHN EGGIE AND JOSEPH EGGIE, TRADING AS PARKSIDE MOTOR CAR COMPANY, DEFENDANTS.
    Submitted March 22, 1923
    Decided June 5, 1923.
    Salesmen’s! Commissions — Automobiles—Accord and Satisfaction.
    On defendant’s rule to show cause.
    Before Justices Parker, Bergen and Minturn.
    For the plaintiff, Patrick H. Harding.
    
    For the defendants, Sydney T. Smith..
    
   Per Curiam.

This is defendants’ rule to show cause. The claim is for commissions as auto salesman, claimed to have been earned on three several transactions. The case is submitted on briefs and no brief for plaintiff is before us. On examination of the testimony we find, in addition to facts and circumstances casting serious doubt on the correctness of plaintiff’s claim both as to validity and amount, very satisfactory testimony that all matters between the parties were settled and disposed of by an accord and satisfaction some time after plaintiff ceased to have any relations with the defendant.

The rule will be made absolute.