Case ID: br_19/html/1703-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NORTHERN PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION CO., appellant, v. MARATHON PIPE LINE COMPANY and United States.
    No. 81-150.
    Supreme Court of the United States.
    March 22, 1982.
   Facts and opinion, In the Matter of Northern Pipeline Construction Company, Bkrtcy., 6 B.R. 928; D.C., 12 B.R. 946.

The motion of Beneficial Corporation for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for additional time for argument is denied. The motion of Commercial Law League of America to reconsider order denying motion for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for additional time for argument is denied.