Case ID: f-appx_63/html/0734-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tina Louise PEELE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-6301.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted May 15, 2003.
    Decided May 22, 2003.
    Tina Louise Peele, Appellant Pro Se. Raymond Edward Patriceo, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Tina Louise Peele seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Peele has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.