Case ID: f-appx_671/html/0427-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George C. CHATMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 14-56794
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted November 16, 2016 
    
    Filed November 23, 2016
    George C. Chatman, Pro Se.
    Benjamin L. Tompkins, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USLA—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, Richard Caldar-one, Attorney, Robert William Metzler, Supervisory Attorney, DOJ—U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Tax Division/Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

George C. Chatman appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging that defendants violated his constitutional rights and committed various torts against him by instructing him to file tax returns for the years 2010, 2011, and 2012. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

Chatman failed to address any of the district court’s grounds for dismissal, and has therefore waived his appeal of the district court’s order. See Indep. Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[W]e will not consider any claims that were not actually argued in appellant’s opening brief.”); Acosta-Huerta v. Estelle, 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir. 1993) (issues not supported by argument in pro se appellant’s opening brief are waived).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.