Case ID: misc_155/html/0586-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Consolidated Construction Corporation, Appellant, v. Board of Education of the City of New York, Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    May 10, 1935.
    
      
      Teck & Teck, for the appellant.
    
      Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

It was error to deny plaintiff’s application for leave to discontinue the action made before plaintiff completed its proofs. (2 Carmody New York Prac. 1464; Civ. Prac. Act, § 457; Dailey v. Northern N. Y. Utilities, 129 Misc. 183, at p. 186.)

Judgment and orders reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and motion for discontinuance granted upon payment of costs within ten days, the costs awarded by this court to be set off against the costs upon discontinuance.

All concur; present, Hammer, Callahan and Shientag. JJ.