Case ID: f2d_134/html/0824-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. SPORT-WEAR HOSIERY MILLS.
    No. 9349.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
    April 13, 1943.
    Robert B. Watts, Ernest A. Gross, Howard Lichtenstein, Jacob I. ICarro, and Harry G. Carlson, all of Washington, D. C., and Henry Shore, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for petitioner.
    S. T. Mallen, of Chattanooga, Tenn., and Reuel R. Webb, of Etowah, Tenn., for respondent.
    Before HICKS, SIMONS, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Petition to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board.

The jurisdiction of the Board is conceded.

The Board found that respondent violated Sections 8(1) and 8(3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158 (1 and 3), by the discriminatory discharge of its employees, Horace McConkey and A1 Roper, and by interfering with, restraining and coercing its employees in the exercise of their rights guaranteed in Sec. 7 of the Act, 49 Stat. 449, 29 U.S.C.A., § 151 et seq. We need not enter into a detailed discussion of the findings or the evidence upon which they were based. In this respect we are content to follow the procedure in N.L.R.B. v. Swift & Co. et al., 6 Cir., 127 F.2d 30, and cases there cited. An examination of the record discloses that the findings are supported by substantial evidence and we are not free to set them aside. N.L.R.B. v. Nevada Cons. Copper Corp., 316 U.S. 105, 62 S.Ct. 960, 86 L.Ed. 1305.

Enforcement of the order is decreed. See N.L.R.B. v. Bersted Mfg. Co., 6 Cir., 128 F.2d 738, amending the opinion in the same case in 6 Cir., 124 F.2d 409.