Case ID: ohio-st_120/html/0058-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "By the Court.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hutson v. Briggs et al.
    (No. 21208
    Decided February 20, 1929.)
    
      Mr. John P. Phillips, Mr. John Logan and Messrs. Vorys, Sater, Seymour é Pease, for plaintiff- in error.
    
      Mr. A. C. Patton, Mr, E. L. Bush and Messrs. Williams, Sinks S Williams, for defendants in error.
   By the Court.

It appearing, that three of the judges of the court, to wit, Kinkade, Jones and. Allen, are of opinion that the judgment herein should be affirmed, and three of the judges of the court, to wit, Robinson, Matthias and Day, are in favor of a judgment of reversal, and one judge, to wit, Marshall, C. J., does not participate, the court being thus equally divided in opinion as to the merits of the case and unable for that reason to agree upon a judgment, the entry of this fact constitutes an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

Judgment affirmed.'

Kinkade, Jones and Allen, JJ., concur.

Marshall, O. J., not participating.