Case ID: ohio-st-3d_74/html/0607-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Frease.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Frease (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 607.]
    (No. 95-2130
    Submitted December 6, 1995
    Decided February 28, 1996.)
    
      
      Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
    
      Jerry F. Whitmer, John C. Fiches and John A. Schwemler, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

After reviewing the record, we agree with the board. We adopt its findings of fact and conclusions of law and indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law in Ohio. Furthermore, as a condition for reinstatement, respondent must make full restitution to his clients with interest according to the judgment rate. We tax costs to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Cook, J., dissents and would disbar.