Case ID: a3d_27/html/0984-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. James Howard NEIMAN, Jr., Petitioner.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Aug. 10, 2011.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of August, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

1. Whether Pennsylvania [Act 152 of 2004] violates the single[-]subject rule of Article III, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.
2. Whether, if Act 152 violates the single-subject rule of Article III, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, Megan’s Law can be sustained by severance of the remaining portions of Act 152 of 2004.