Case ID: f-appx_478/html/0020-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edward Harold SAUNDERS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth E. LAY, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 12-6883.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 4, 2012.
    Decided: Sept. 12, 2012.
    
      Edward Harold Saunders, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
    . Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edward Harold Saunders, Jr. appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Saunders v. Lay, No. 5:11-cv-00566-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.