Case ID: nj-eq_96/html/0673-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alice R. Taft, as executrix, &c., respondent, v. Mary Bely et al., appellants.
    [Decided October 20th, 1924.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Griffin, whose opinion is reported in 96 N. J. Eq. im.
    
    
      Messrs. Benny & Gruden, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. Aaron A. Melnik er, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.

For affirmance — Kalisch, Katzehbach, Campbell, White, Vah Buskirk, Clark, McGlekkoh—7.

For reversal—The Chief-Justice, Trestchard, Parker. Mikturk, Black, Llotd, Eats—7.