Case ID: f-appx_693/html/0201-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Phillip W. FIELDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David ROBINSON, Chief Corrections Operations; Harold W. Clarke, Director of the Department of Corrections; Gregory Holloway, Regional Administrator; Tracy Ray, Warden; Rick White, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 17-6231
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 20, 2017
    Decided: July 18, 2017
    
      Phillip W. Fields, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appel-lees.
    Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion,

PER CURIAM:

Phillip W. Fields appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants and denying his cross-motion for summary judgment in his civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000ec to 2000cc-5 (2012). Applying a de novo standard of review, Lawson v. Union Cty. Clerk of Court, 828 F.3d 239, 247 (4th Cir. 2016); Henson v. Liggett Grp., Inc., 61 F.3d 270, 274 (4th Cir. 1995), we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the district court’s judgment. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fields v. Robinson, No. 3:15-cv-00455-HEH, 2017 WL 253955 (E.D. Va. Jan. 19, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED