Case ID: sw3d_62/html/0439-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ernest James SCHILLING, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 58922.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Sept. 18, 2001.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 30, 2001.
    Application for Transfer Denied Jan. 22, 2002.
    
      Ernest James Schilling, Colorado Springs, CO, pro se.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Richard A. Starnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before ROBERT G. ULRICH, Presiding Judge, PATRICIA BRECKENRIDGE and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judges.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Earnest James Schilling appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).