Case ID: nj-eq_110/html/0069-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stephen G. Van Hoesen et al., respondent, v. Samuel Gelfen et al., appellant.
    [Decided February 1st, 1932.]
    
      Mr. Harold Bouton, for the respondent.
    
      Messrs. Kraemer, Siegler & Siegler, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan, and reported in 103 N. J. Eq. 234.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.