Case ID: f-appx_654/html/0194-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Damaso CASTILLO-CACERES, also known as Damaso Castillo, Defendant-Appellant
    No. 15-40126
    Summary Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Date Filed: 06/17/2016
    Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Damaso Castillo-Caceres, Pro Se.
    Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Da-maso Castillo-Caceres has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castillo-Caceres has filed a response. The record is not' sufficiently developed to.allow us to make a fair evaluation of Castillo-Caceres’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions. of the record reflected therein, as well as Castillo-Ca-ceres’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.