Case ID: ga_174/html/0481-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Farmers State Bank v. Scott.
    No. 8455.
    February 19, 1932.
    
      Hollis Fort, for plaintiff in error.
    
      B. S. Miller, and T. B. Bagley, contra.
   Pee Curiam.

This case comes before this court upon exceptions to the grant of an interlocutory injunction. On this question the Justices of this court are equally divided in opinion. Russell, C. J., and Hill and Hines, JJ., are for affirmance under the pleadings ahd evidence. Beck, P. J., and Atkinson and G-ilbert, JJ., are for reversal. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed by operation of law.