Case ID: so3d_245/html/1003-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

U.S. BANK, N.A., etc., Appellant, v. LEASE CAPITAL, LLC, Appellee.
    No. 3D17-369
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed May 16, 2018
    Weitz & Schwartz, P.A. and Sarah T. Weitz (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant.
    Law Offices of Evan M. Rosen, P.A. and Evan M. Rosen (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.
    Before SUAREZ, SCALES and LUCK, JJ.
    ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
   PER CURIAM.

In March 2016, the trial court-correctly, based on our precedent at the time, Deutsche Bank Tr. Co. Americas v. Beauvais, No. 3D14-575, 2014 WL 7156961, at *1 (Fla. 3d DCA Dec. 17, 2014), opinion withdrawn and superseded on reh'g en banc, 188 So.3d 938 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) -granted summary judgment in favor of Lease Capital, LLC on its statute of limitations affirmative defense. Now that our en banc court decided Beauvais, and the Florida Supreme Court ruled as it did in Bartram v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 211 So.3d 1009 (Fla. 2016), Lease Capital commendably confesses that the trial court's summary judgment must be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings. We agree, and do so now.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.