Case ID: or_247/html/0487-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued July 14,
    affirmed August 23, 1967
    WHITE, Respondent, v. WHITE, Appellant.
    
    430 P. 2d 861
    
      Edward V. O’Reilly, Eugene, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.
    
      Hale G. Thompson, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Thompson, Mumford & Woodrich, Eugene.
    Before Perry, Chief Justice, and Sloan, Goodwin, Denecke and Lusk, Justices.
   PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from a decree of divorce, defendant protests only of the division of the property. Our review of the record reveals that the trial court’s studied judgment resulted in a fair division of the property.

Affirmed.