Case ID: ad_279/html/0606-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gertrude Hartman, Appellant, v. Moritz Hartman, Respondent.
   Since the judgment was on the merits and not a nonsuit, a decision stating the facts which the trial court deemed essential was required. (Mario v. De Oteris, 275 App. Div. 790; Goldberg V. Bruns, Kimball & Co., 276 App. Div. 862.) Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.