Case ID: nj-eq_121/html/0048-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles G. Alberts, executor, &c., complainant-respondent, v. Louisa E. Alberts and Helen L. Muller, defendants-appellants; Public Service Corporation of New Jersey, defendant.
    [Argued May 29th, 1936.
    Decided October 2d, 1936.]
    
      Mr. Samuel Weitzman, for the complainant-respondent.
    
      Messrs. Melosh, Morten ■& Melosh (Mr. Louis O. Morten), for the defendants-appellants.
   Per Curiam.

This case, on another angle, was considered by us in an opinion reported in 119 N. J. Eq. 391. The record was remitted and defendants then sought leave in chancery to submit further proofs. The vice-chancellor decided that the application should be denied. No convincing reason is presented why that conclusion should be disturbed.

The decree below will be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee- Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, RaeEERTY, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.