Case ID: f-appx_203/html/0121-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Hugo GARCIA-RIZO, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-50180.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 11, 2006.
    
    Filed Oct. 17, 2006.
    Kyle W. Hoffman, USSD-Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Stephen D. Demik, Esq., FDSD-Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant — Appellant.
    Before: TASHIMA, W. FLETCHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Appellee’s unopposed motion for summary vacation of the district court judgment revoking supervised release and imposing sentence after revocation is granted. We vacate the judgment and remand to enable the district court to conform the written judgment to the oral pronouncement. See United States v. Hicks, 997 F.2d 594, 597 (9th Cir.1993) (remanding to permit district court to conform written judgment to oral pronouncement).

VACATED AND REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.