Case ID: f-appx_502/html/0307-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bert V.E. PARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George TRENT; Donna Kuroski; Ashley Ginanni; John Doe, Unknown, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 12-7224.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 21, 2012.
    Decided: Dec. 28, 2012.
    
      Bert V.E. Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Llewellyn Deniker, Sara Ellen Hauptfuehrer, Steptoe & Johnson, PLLC, Bridgeport, West Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bert V.E. Parker appeals the district court’s orders adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing Parker’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and denying Parker’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to amend. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Parker v. Trent, No. l:10-cv-00120-IMK-DJJ (ND.W.Va. Jan. 10 & June 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.