Case ID: so2d_479/html/0793-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FLORIDA EASTERN PROPERTIES, INC., Appellant, v. SOUTHEAST COMMERCIAL DEVELOPERS, INC., Appellee.
    Nos. 84-1673, 85-116.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Nov. 21, 1985.
    Rehearing Denied Dec. 26, 1985.
    Gregory E. Tucci of Berk & Tucci, P.A., Ocala, for appellant.
    Adam G. Adams, III of Adams & Adams, Jacksonville, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Based upon this court’s reading of Conklin v. Hurley, 428 So.2d 654 (Fla.1983), we affirm. However, we certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court as being of great public importance pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v):

DO IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF FITNESS AND MERCHANTABILITY EXTEND TO FIRST PURCHASERS FROM DEVELOPERS OF REAL ESTATE WITH COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES ON THE LAND?

AFFIRMED.

COBB, C.J., and ORFINGER and SHARP, JJ., concur.