Case ID: or_124/html/0584-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PEE CUEIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued March 5,
    affirmed March 20, 1928.
    HAROLD McEWEN v. A. B. CUTLER.
    (265 Pac. 1116.)
    From Multnomah: George Eossman, Judge.
    Department 2.
    Affirmed.
    For appellant there was a brief over the names of Messrs. Senn & Becken and Mr. F. C. McDougal, with an oral argument by Mr. F. 8. Sewn.
    
    For respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Mr. Chester G. Murphy.
    
   PEE CUEIAM.

The court is unanimously of the opinion that there is manifestly no merit in this appeal. Therefore, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.