Case ID: scl_19/html/0226-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Johnson J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edward Anderson v. Charles Fowler.
    
      Tried before Mr. Justice Evans, at Laurens — Spring Term, 1833.
    This action was brought before a Justice of the peace, to recover the penalty under the act of 1817, for refusing to enter satisfaction on an execution.— The magistrate gave judgment for the penalty, which under $20. On appeal to the Circuit Court, his of-judgment was reversed, and the plaintiff now appeals * tO tlllS vOUit*
    is~bdobt penal statute, & ver” presiribed, Sustpbeciifth? ofPLaw jurisdiction a justice of peace, unless by express grant of the Legisla-tendto°pentities"
   Johnson J.

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The general rule is very clear that when an offence is created by statute under penalty, and no particular mode of recovery is pointed out, the proceeding must be in the superior Court of law, nor can that Court be ousted of its jurisdiction but by express words. Bacon Ab.Courts and their jurisdiction, D. 1. Cates v. Knight, 3 Term Rep. 444. The act of 1817 does not refer the jurisdiction of this offence to any particular tribu» nal, and according to this rule the jurisdiction of it belongs to the superior Courts of law.

The jurisdiction of a Justice of the peace is a limited jurisdiction, ascertained and defined by the act of 1799. (1 Brev. dig. 476) and upon the principle of the rule before laid down, his jurisdiction cannot be extended but by express grant or necessary implication. Bacon Ab. Courts and their jurisdiction. D. 3.

Motion dismissed.

O’Neall J. concurred.

Harper J. absent.