Case ID: ohio-st-3d_83/html/0120-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Douglas, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[The State ex rel.] Dayton Walther Corporation, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio; Grimes, Appellee.
    [Cite as State ex rel. Dayton Walther Corp. v. Indus. Comm. (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 120.]
    (No. 96-2380
    Submitted July 8, 1998
    Decided September 16, 1998.)
    
      Dunlevey, Mahan & Furry, L.P.A., Gary W. Auman, William H. Barney III and William P. Allen, for appellant.
    
      E.S. Gallon & Associates and Richard M. Malone, for appellee.
   The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part.

Douglas, J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part. I would affirm, in part, the judgment of the court of appeals and reverse, in part, the judgment of the court of appeals. In so doing, I would reinstate the order of the commission.

F.E. Sweeney, J., concurs in the foregoing opinion.