Case ID: cust-ct_2/html/0677-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 41137.
    Protest 203747-G of Nathan Schreiber (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel embroidered articles similar to those involved in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, and articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230 were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31.