Case ID: so3d_170/html/0972-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CRUTCHER-TUFTS CORPORATION v. Peter COLEMAN, Alise Durand, Douglas J. Durand, Stephanie T. Butler, John Doe, Jane Doe, And System Parking, Inc.
    No. 2015-OC-0340.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    May 22, 2015.
   In re Alise Durand; Douglas J. Du-rand; — Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. N, No. 2013-11628; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2014-C-1416.

Granted. Although the trial court set the return date more than thirty days from the date of the ruling, the court has authority to extend the deadline under Rule 4-3. Relators’ application, filed within the time limit authorized by the trial court, is timely. See Barnard, v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), 675 So.2d 734. Accordingly, the ruling of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside, and the application is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration on the merits.