Case ID: cust-ct_26/html/0360-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Cole, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 55240.
    Frederick Stearns & Company, Frederick Stearns & Company Division of Sterling Drug, Inc., Successor v. United States,
    protest 140782-K (Detroit).
   Opinion by

Cole, J.

The undisputed facts in this case established that the beef liver extract, described on the invoice as “Hidago Concentrado 1:20 en Polvo,” is properly dutiable as alleged by plaintiff. In accordance with stipulation of counsel, received in evidence as exhibit 2, that the remainder of the merchandise in question is substantially the same as that passed upon in Roche-Organon v. United States (35 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 378), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was also sustained as to said items.