Case ID: so2d_562/html/0851-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Olga M. FRAGA, Appellant, v. Antonio O. FRAGA, Appellee.
    Nos. 88-853, 88-2200 and 88-2292.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 19, 1990.
    Young, Stern & Tannenbaum, Glen Raf-kin and Andrew S. Berman, North Miami Beach, for appellant.
    Barranco, Kellough & Kircher, Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin, Daniels & Hicks, Angela C. Flowers and Sam Daniels, Miami, for appellee.
    Before HUBBART, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
   ON APPELLANT’S ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO RECALL OR ENFORCE MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

On remand the court simply deleted the sentence in Part V of the Amended Final Judgment which provided that it had “taken into consideration, in setting the amount of monthly alimony, tax free monies the wife will be receiving from her share of the equitable distribution of the parties’ property.” In that there will be no tax-free monies from her share of the divided property, equity requires that the $500,000 ten-year payout of Mrs. Fraga’s equitable distribution be at present value and secured by a lien against the former’s husband interest in the Douglas Medical Center.

The cause is remanded with instructions to revise the judgment accordingly.