Case ID: ohio-st-3d_66/html/0334-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cincinnati Bar Association v. Warren.
    [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Warren (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 334.]
    (No. 93-390
    Submitted April 6, 1993
    Decided June 9, 1993.)
    
      
      Wood & Lamping, Henry E. Menninger, Jr., and Naomi C. Dallob, for relator.
    
      Burlew, Caliman & Youngblood Co., L.P.A., and John H. Burlew, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, we suspend respondent from the practice of law for one year, with the suspension stayed upon the following conditions: (1) respondent be placed on probation for two years and be required to meet regularly with a monitoring attorney who has been assigned by relator and who will supervise respondent’s office practices; (2) during the probationary period, respondent take ten hours of continuing legal education courses on law office management in addition to the standard education requirements; (3) during the probationary period, respondent commit no further disciplinary violations; and (4) respondent immediately dismiss her pending litigation against the Jacksons and submit to mandatory binding arbitration before the Fee Dispute Committee of the Cincinnati Bar Association, if the Jacksons so agree.

Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.