Case ID: ad2d_8/html/0808-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Louis Berkley, Respondent, v. Korcad Corporation, Appellant.
   Order denying defendant’s motion to vacate a warrant of attachment or in the alternative to increase the plaintiff’s bond unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. Defendant’s motion to vacate the warrant of attachment did not constitute a general appearance in the circumstances of this case. (Zabriskie v. Second Nat. Bank, 204 App. Div. 428, 430.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Bréitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.