Case ID: f-appx_675/html/0357-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Matthew WAKEFIELD, In Propria Persona, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CIRCUIT COURT OF VIRGINIA, d/b/a Karin Riley Porter, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 16-7329
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: January 31, 2017
    Decided: February 3, 2017
    Matthew Wakefield, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Matthew Wakefield appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Wakefield v. Circuit Court of Va., No. 1:16-cv-00666-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED