Case ID: f-appx_34/html/0380-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gerard J. REIMERING, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. THE RETIREMENT PENSION PLAN OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION and the California State Automobile Association Inter-Insurance Bureau; California State Automobile Association; California State Automobile Association Inter-Insurance Bureau, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 01-15505. D.C. No. CV-99-04054-THE(JL).
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted April 12, 2002.
    Decided May 10, 2002.
    
      Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, B. FLETCHER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
   MEMORANDUM

The Early Retirement Incentives Program was not under serious consideration until after Reimering’s retirement. Reimering never made a specific inquiry about a possible plan enhancement, and defendants therefore had no duty to inform him of sporadic discussions of the subject. See Bins v. Exxon Co. U.S.A., 220 F.3d 1042, 1048-49 (9th Cir.2000).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.