Case ID: nj-eq_77/html/0589-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Francis E. Larkin et al., appellants, v. James H. Wikoff et al., defendant-respondents.
    [Argued July 8th and 11th, 1910.
    Decided November 14th, 1910.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Walker, whose opinion is reported in 75 N. J. Eq. (5 Buch.) 462.
    
    
      Mr. John V. B. Wicoff, for the defendant-respondents.
    
      Mr. Adrian S. Appelget, for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

So much of the decree as is involved in this appeal will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Walker in the court below.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parke?, Bergen, Voori-iees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Dill, Congdon — 13.

For reversal — None.