Case ID: f-appx_656/html/0013-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Fred GOAD, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-6436
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: August 25, 2016
    Decided: August 30, 2016
    Christopher Fred Goad, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Ronald Gill, Assistant United States Attorney, Erik Sean Sie-bert, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Fred Goad, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Goad, No. 3:08-cr-00184-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED