Case ID: nc_147/html/0298-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee. OusiaM :", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. M. MANNING and T. A. MANN v. INTERSTATE TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY.
    (Filed 8 April, 1908).
    Telephone Companies — Partnership—Rates to Partnerships — Persons Entitled to Partnership Rates.
    When the rates of charges by a telephone company fix a certain charge for telephone service for copartnerships, two persons having connecting offices and partners as to some but not as to all matters of their vocation are entitled to the rate of charge allowed to copartners.
    ActioN tried before W. R. Allen, Jat September Term, 1907, of DuRi-iam.
    Defendant appealed. -
    
      Manning & Foushee for plaintiffs.
    
      Fuller & Fuller for defendant.
   Pee. OusiaM :

The Court deems it unnecessary to discuss the subject of what constitutes an unlawful discrimination upon the part of a telephone company. It appears in the record that the fee which defendant is authorized to charge to copartnerships for the use of one ’phone is $3.50 per month. It appears that plaintiffs are copartners in “minor surgery” (whatever that may be) and occupy connecting offices used in the business, and as such use one ’phone in common. The fact that they have private practice not embraced by their copartnership does not make them any the less copartners, and we think as such they come within the schedule of defendant’s rates and must be charged as copartners.

Affirmed.