Case ID: f-appx_418/html/0244-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re: James A. ROSE, III, Debtor. Algernon Lee Butler, III, Trustee in Bankruptcy for James A. Rose, III, Trustee-Appellant, v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee; Residential Funding Company, LLC, Defendants-Appellees, and William Walt Pettit, Defendant.
    No. 10-1285.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 15, 2011.
    Decided: March 21, 2011.
    
      Algernon L. Butler, III, Butler & Butler, L.L.P., Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellant. Alan B. Powell, Christopher C. Finan, Roberson, Haworth & Reese, P.L.L.C., High Point, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Algernon L. Butler, III, as trustee in bankruptcy for the estate of James A. Rose, III, appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying the trustee’s motion seeking to invalidate — on the basis of a typographical error — the deed of trust currently held by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas on certain real property of the estate. The bankruptcy court and the district court held that a bona fide purchaser would have been on notice as to the error in the deed and, therefore, the trustee may not avoid the lien under 11 U.S.C. § 544(a) (2006). We have reviewed the record included on appeal, the parties’ briefs, and all supplemental materials before the court and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated below. In re Rose (Butler v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co.), Nos. 7:09-cv-00145-FL; L-08-00080-8-AP, 2009 WL 2226658 (E.D.N.C. July 20, 2009); (Feb. 9, 2010). We deny the Appellant’s motion for reconsideration of this court’s order entered June 10, 2010, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.