Case ID: sw2d_910/html/0837-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kristin OBERHELLMANN, Respondent, v. Elmer OBERHELLMANN, Appellant.
    No. 67459.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Nov. 28, 1995.
    Richard E. Schwartz, James E. Parrot, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Catalina Margarita Alvarez, Clayton, for respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., KAROHL, J., and RONNIE L. WHITE, Senior Judge.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Elmer C. Oberhellmann appeals from orders pendente lite and the denial of his motion to extend the time for discovery in this dissolution of marriage action. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended written opinion. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgments of the trial court are affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).