Case ID: nj-eq_121/html/0614-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ethel Yeomans Sherman, complainant-respondent v. Alton L. Sherman et al., defendants; Alton L. Sherman, defendant-appellant.
    [Submitted February term, 1937.
    Decided April 30th, 1937.]
    
      Mr. Lionel P. Xristeller, for the defendant-appellant.
    
      Messrs. Goult, Satz <& Tomlinson (Mr. Joseph Ooult), for the complainant-respondent.
   Per Curiam.

•The pleadings and proofs have been carefully examined. It is apparent therefrom that the order appealed from vacating the preliminary restraint was a proper exercise of a sound judicial discretion.

The order is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.