Case ID: f2d_1/html/1021-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George HAUGHRAN, alias George Miller, and Dallas M. Francis, Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant in Error.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
    November 17, 1924.)
    No. 4134.
    In Error to the District Court of the United Slates for the Eastern Division of the Southern District of Ohio; John E. Sater, Judge.
    C. C. Middleswart, of Marietta, Ohio (Edw. B. Follett, of Marietta, Ohio, on the brief), for plaintiffs in error. Benson W. Hough, Dana F. Reynolds, and W. B. Bartels, all of Columbus, Ohio, for defendant in error.
    Before DONAHUE, MAOK. and KNAPPJBN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

It appears from the record and briefs in this case and the statement of counsel in open court that the sole contention of plaintiffs in error is that the verdict of the jury is manifestly against the weight of the evidence. This court has no authority to consider and determine the weight of the evidence. R. S. § 1011 (Comp. Stat. § 1672); Roth v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 294 F. 475; Bullock v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 289 F. 29, 32. Judgment affirmed.