Case ID: ala-app_26/html/0170-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SAMPORD, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

155 So. 637
    HORNSBY v. RUSH.
    3 Div. 751.
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    May 22, 1934.
    Rehearing Denied June 5, 1934.
    
      Weil, Stakely & Cater, of Montgomery, for appellant.
    Ball & Ball, of Montgomery, for appellee.
   SAMPORD, Justice.

The action was on a promissory note. The plea was usury, in short by consent. The cause was submitted to the trial judge, sitting without a jury, on an agreed statement of facts.

Under the evidence the consideration for the note sued on was $92.50 and a coupon issued by “Merchants Coupon Service Company” of the face value of $10 and an agreed value of $7.50. The defendant executed the note for $100 and by agreement accepted as the consideration $92.50 in cash and the coupon for $10 at a discount of $2.50. This coupon defendant afterwards used in making payment for a purchase of goods, at its face value. The note called for 8 per cent, interest per annum. This is not usury and the trial court so correctly held. 66 Corpus Juris 172 (§ 61); Hogan v. Thompson, 186 Ark. 497, 54 S.W.(2d) 303.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.