Case ID: sw2d_913/html/0111-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

M.S.S., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. D.D., Respondent/Respondent.
    No. 68059.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Dec. 26, 1995.
    Wittner, Poger, Rosenblum & Spewak, P.C., Barbara L. Greenberg, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Allan F. Stewart, Catherine W. Keefe, Braun, Stewart & Keefe, P.C., Clayton, for respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Natural father appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion to set aside his consent to the adoption of his child. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are not erroneous; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished -with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).