Case ID: f-appx_315/html/0497-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marty Lorenzo WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-8332.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 26, 2009.
    Decided: March 9, 2009.
    Marty Lorenzo Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Scott W. Putney, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marty Lorenzo Wright appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wright, No. 4:95-cr-00039-RAJ-1; 4:95-cr-00044-RAJ-1 (E.D.Va. Sept. 18, 2008) We deny the Wright’s motion to place the appeal in abeyance for United States Dunphy, as moot, because that opinion has now issued see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009), and grant his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.