Case ID: so3d_266/html/0881-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

T.L.D., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-1315
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Opinion filed March 29, 2019
    James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Ailene S. Rogers, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
    Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Raleigh , 686 So.2d 621, 622-23 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (rejecting argument that section 800.04, Florida Statutes, is unconstitutional as applied to defendant because it precluded the defense of consent of minor victim, observing that "[i]t cannot be of any constitutional or logical significance to the child victim if the perpetrator is only seventeen-sixteen ... or ten").

WALLIS, LAMBERT, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.