Case ID: ohio-st-3d_62/html/1222-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Toledo Bar Association v. Browarsky.
    [Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Browarsky (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 1222.]
    (No. 90-2078
    Submitted and decided December 20, 1991.)
   On Application for Reinstatement.

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Phillip Browarsky.

The court coming now to consider its order of June 5, 1991, suspending respondent, Phillip Browarsky, from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(7)(c), finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that Phillip Browarsky be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent comply with the registration requirements of Gov.Bar R. VI.

For earlier case, see Toledo Bar Assn. v. Browarsky (1991), 60 Ohio St.3d 100, 573 N.E.2d 72.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.