Case ID: ad_230/html/0749-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sarah Barton, Respondent, v. Samuel Paul, Appellant. 
    
    
      
       Revd., 255 N. Y.-.
    
   Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Hinman, Davis, Whitmyer and Hasbrouek, JJ., concur; Van Kirk, P. J., votes to reverse and dismiss complaint because of the contributory negligence of the plaintiff on undisputed evidence. (Baker v. Close, 137 App. Div. 529; affd., 204 N. Y. 92; Knapp v. Barrett, 216 id. 226, 232: Dolfini v. Erie R. R. Co., 178 id. 1, 4; Wood v. Pace, 220 App. Div. 386; affd., 250 N. Y. 556; Barker v. Savage, 45 id. 191.)