Case ID: so2d_874/html/0692-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Keith Sterling GRUNFELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D03-2473.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 26, 2004.
    Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Richard B. Greene, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation but remand for the court to enter a written order conforming the sentence to the oral pronouncement. While the court had orally imposed concurrent sentences on both counts at issue, the final judgment only imposed a sentence on count II, specifying that it was to run concurrent with count I. The court did not issue a written judgment as to count I. The state concedes that the court should also issue a judgment on count I in conformance with its oral pronouncement.

Affirmed but remanded to enter judgment and sentence on count I.

WARNER, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.