Case ID: sw3d_377/html/0616-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Maurice WILLIAMS, Appellant.
    No. ED 97306.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Sept. 11, 2012.
    Damien de Loyola, Assistant Appellate Defender, Office of the Public Defender, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
    Shaun Mary Morgan, Assistant Circuit Attorney, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
    Before: LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and KURT S. ODENWALD, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Maurice Williams (Williams) appeals from the trial court’s judgment after a jury convicted him of misdemeanor stealing. Williams asserts that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal because the record contains insufficient evidence to support a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt for misdemeanor stealing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of prejudicial error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).