Case ID: dc_1/html/0253-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "The Court", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Burford v. Ringgold & Morsell.
    The Court, at an adjourned session, will not hear a motion to dissolve an injunction upon notice given after the first session of the term.
    Injunction. The answers of the defendants were filed August 10, 1805, and notice of motion to dissolve on the 30th of September, 1805, (the day to which the July term stood adjourned) was served on Burford on the 18th of August, and on Mr. Youngs, his solicitor, on the 21st September, who acknowledged service and promised to attend on this day (October 4, 1805.)
   The Court

refused to hear the motion to dissolve at this time. (See the decision of the Court in Alexandria, in the case of Wright v. West's Executrix, [post] where the Court refused, at the adjourned Court in March, to take up cases which were set for decree or dissolution, subsequent to the original term of November, 1803.)