Case ID: sw3d_243/html/0436-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael BREIHAN, Claimant/Appellant, v. BANTA & STUDE CONST. CO., INC., Employer, and Treasurer of Missouri Custodian of Second Injury Fund, Respondent.
    No. ED 89685.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Nov. 20, 2007.
    Ray B. Marglous; Robert S. Merlin, Clayton, MO, for Appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Laura C. Wagener, Assistant Attorney General, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
    Before MARY K. HOFF, P. J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Breihan (Claimant) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) ordering the Second Injury Fund (Fund) to begin paying weekly differential payments on December 12, 2005, after the employer’s permanent partial disability payments ended. Claimant argues the Commission erred in setting December 12, 2005 as the date for the Fund to begin the weekly differential payments because Missouri law allows and requires payments to be made by the employer and the Fund concurrently. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).