Case ID: nys_121/html/1146-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROTHSTEIN, Respondent, v. BRUCK, Appellant, et al.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    October, 1909.)
    Action by Harry Rothstein against Samuel L. Bruck, impleaded with Samuel Abramson and Samuel A. Potter, doing business as copartners under the firm name of Abramson & Potter.
   PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, and motion granted, on conditions stated in memorandum. In default of compliance, order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Settle order on notice.