Case ID: f-appx_464/html/0131-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jonathan BOLLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS, Defendant-Appellee.
    
      This case was not selected for publication in the Federal Reporter
    
    
      UNPUBLISHED
    
    No. 11-2115.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 9, 2012.
    Decided: Feb. 13, 2012.
    Jonathan Bolls, Appellant Pro Se. Catherine Crooks Hill, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Bolls appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint challenging the constitutionality of the Appellee’s rules governing release of a failed applicant’s essay examination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bolls v. Virginia Board of Bar Examiners, 811 F.Supp.2d 1260 (E.D.Va.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.