Case ID: njl_111/html/0396-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROSEVILLE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, RESPONDENT, v. SOLOMON GRUDIN, APPELLANT.
    Argued May 17, 1933
    Decided September 27, 1933.
    
      For the appellant, Tumarlcin & Kasen (William B. Kasen, of counsel).
    For the respondent, Philip Mandelbaum (Herman Marx, of counsel).
   Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Smith in the Circuit Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chiee Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Case, Bodine, Donges, ECehee, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.