Case ID: nys_99/html/1049-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. KRUSE, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CITY OF BUFFALO v. DELAWARE, L. & W. R. CO.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    July 12, 1906.)
    Action by the city of Buffalo against the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company. •
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

KRUSE, J.,

dissents on the ground that even if the statute applies, the facts found in the eighteenth and nineteenth findings of fact show that there was not an abandonment of the street, within the meaning of the statute, and that so far as the facts contained in the third conclusion of law are at variance with the facts found in the eighteenth and nineteenth findings of fact, the latter must control. See Nickell v. Tracy, 184 N. Y. 386, 77 N. E. 391.