Case ID: f2d_121/html/0452-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. BANCITALY CORPORATION, Respondent. BANCITALY CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
    No. 9841.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    June 16, 1941.
    Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. P. Wenchel, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C. , for Commissioner.
    George H. Koster, of San Francisco, Cal., Charles D. Hamel, of Washington, D. C., Monroe Goldwater, of New York City, and John Enrietto, of Washington, D. C., for Bancitaly Corporation.
    Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and HANEY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the joint motion of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the petitions to review herein be dismissed, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and mandate of this court issued forthwith.