Case ID: sw3d_571/html/0242-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James NICHOLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    ED 106745
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    Filed: April 9, 2019
    Amy E. Lowe, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
    Eric Schmitt, Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
    Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

James Nichols appeals the motion court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).