Case ID: pa_638/html/0632-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

158 A.3d 65
    Roulette PRICE, Respondent v. Alan CATANZARITI, D.P.M., Petitioner
    No. 177 WAL 2016
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    September 19, 2016
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to Petitioner’s first issue. The order of the Superior Court is VACATED, as issues neither raised nor preserved for appellate review are waived and may not constitute the basis for reversal of a trial court’s decision. See, e.g., Wiegand v. Wiegand, 461 Pa. 482, 337 A.2d 256 (1975). The case is REMANDED to the Superior Court for determination based upon full consideration of the issues raised and preserved for appeal by Respondent.