Case ID: njl_127/html/0228-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MAGGIE T. PLOCH, RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF CLIFTON, APPELLANT.
    Argued May 22, 1941 —
    Decided September 19, 1941.
    Por the respondent, Mendelsohn & Mendelsohn.
    
    Por the appellant, John Q. Dluhy.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bodine, Perskie, Porter, Colib, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Bafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.