Case ID: f_178/html/1007-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO. v. LOEWENSTEIN.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    May 21, 1910.)
    No. 959.
    In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Richard H. Bland (Bartiett. Olaggett & Bland, on the brief), for plaintiff in error. W. Harry Holmes (Bruner R. Anderson, on the brief), for defendant in error.
    Before GOFF and PRITCHARD, Circuit Judges, and BOYD, District Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the assignments of error herein, and in view of the circumstances surrounding this case, as well as the stafute in pursuance of which this proceeding was instituted, we are of opinion that substantial justice has been done, and that the learned jiidge who heard this ease was hot in error. Therefore the judgment of the lower court should be affirmed.