Case ID: f-appx_389/html/0222-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Norman Tyrone DAIS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 10-6612.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 22, 2010.
    Decided: Aug. 3, 2010.
    Norman Tyrone Dais, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Norman Tyrone Dais appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b)(3) motion based on allegations of fraud, misrepresentation and misconduct. We have reviewed the record and find Dais did not establish misconduct by clear and convincing evidence or show that he was prevented from presenting his case. See Schultz v. Butcher, 24 F.3d 626, 630 (4th Cir.1994). Accordingly, we find the court did not abuse its discretion denying the motion. Id. We affirm the court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.