Case ID: mcgrath_1/html/0724-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DALY vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Wayne),
    No. 14448,
    102 M., 392.
   To set aside a decree of divorce.

Denied Nov. 7, 1894, with costs.

Relator filed a bill for divorce. Defendant filed an answer in the nature of a cross-bill, to which complainant answered. Defendant was granted a decree March 21, 1894. The cross-bill was verified, but the verification did not contain the averment negativing collusion. June 29, 1894, relator filed a petition asking that the decree be set aside, because (1) no replication to complainant's answer to the cross bill had been filed; (2) defendant's cross-bill was not properly verified; (3) the testimony was taken within four months after the filing of the cross-bill, and (4) the decree was entered within the same time.