Case ID: fla_141/html/0774-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lillias A. Leath, a Widow, v. Margaret Hatheway Zoschke and Agnes Hatheway Senter.
    193 So. 842
    Division B
    Opinion Filed February 16, 1940
    
      James J. Jackson, for Appellant;
    
      Bridges & Bridges, for Appellees.
   Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and ’inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error 'in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Ci-iapman, J. J., concur.

Terrell, C. J., concurs in opinion and judgment.

■ Justices Buford and Thomas not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.