Case ID: so2d_756/html/0238-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Reyes VISCIOSO, Appellant, v. David MANZ, an individual, David Manz, P.A., and Greenman & Manz, P.A., Appellees.
    No. 3D99-2082.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 26, 2000.
    Jeffrey A. Norkin ■ and Jonathan M. Drucker, Miami, for appellant.
    Josephs, Jack & Gaebe and Scott A. Cole, Miami, for appellees.
    Before GERSTEN, GODERICH and SHEVIN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Zeidwig v. Ward, 548 So.2d 209 (Fla.1989)(where court determined . that criminal defendant received effective assistance of counsel,, defendant/attorney in subsequent civil malpractice action may defensively assert collateral estoppel); State v. Viscioso, 709 So.2d 650 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(affirming on appeal and cross appeal order granting Rule 3.850 relief); Johnson v. Raban, 702 S.W.2d 134, 138 (Mo.App.E.D.1985)(effective administration of justice would be undermined if prior decision on same issue is ignored).