Case ID: ohio-st-3d_82/html/0100-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 100.]
    (No. 97-2725
    Submitted March 4, 1998
    Decided June 10, 1998.)
    
      
      Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
   Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. We also note that in August 1994, we suspended respondent for eighteen months, but stayed the suspension on the condition, among others, that he spend the entire time on probation under the guidance of a monitor. Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 75, 637 N.E.2d 296.

Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.