Case ID: nj-eq_107/html/0182-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Louis Satanov Real Estate and Mortgage Corporation, respondent, v. Joseph S. Naame Company et al., appellants.
    [Decided October 20th, 1930.]
    
      Mr. Emerson L. Richards, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. Paul M. Salsburg (Messrs. Cole & Cole, of counsel), for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed,.for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, and reported in 103 N. J. Eq. 383, 386; 143 Atl. Rep. 530, 531.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None. 
      
      The opinion referred to was not reported as stated, but is printed at page 621 post.