Case ID: ny-super-ct_43/html/0562-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "The Court,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WILLIAM B. CANFIELD, and others, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. THE BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendants and Appellants.
    
      Decided November 5, 1877.
    Before Curtis, Ch.- J., Sanford and Freedman, JJ.
    Appeal from a judgment and order denying motion for new trial.
    The action was brought against the defendant as a common carrier, for the loss of certain goods shipped by plaintiff. Plaintiff had a verdict. Defendants appealed from the judgment entered on the verdict, and also from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
    
      Hutchins & Platt, attorneys, Austin G. Fox and Waldo Hutchins, of counsel, for appellant.
    
      Estes & Barnard, attorneys and of counsel, for respondent.
   The Court,

without writing an opinion, affirmed the judgment and order.