Case ID: f-appx_537/html/0921-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Troy HENRY, a.k.a Troy P, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 12-16567
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Oct. 25, 2013.
    Peggy Morris Ronca, Daniel C. Irick, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, Robert E. O’Neill, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Thomas H. Dale, Dale Law Firm, PA, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before MARCUS, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Tom Dale, counsel for Troy Henry in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Henry’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.