Case ID: sw3d_509/html/0885-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bobby D. RIDENOUR, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 103775
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    FILED: February 7, 2017
    Andrew Edward Zleit, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, Attorney for Appellant.
    Josh Hawley, Attorney General, Shaun J. MacKelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorney for Respondent.
    Before Robert M. Clayton III, P. J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Bobby D. Ridenour (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order denying Movant’s Rule 29.15 claims for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).