Case ID: ny-sup-ct_98/html/0639-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dykman, J.:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Patrick P. O'Hehir and Another, Respondents, v. The Middletown-Goshen Traction Company, Appellant.
   Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.—

Dykman, J.:

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment entered in the County Court of Orange county upon the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiffs, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial upon the minutes of the court. The action was for the recovery of $522.20 for a balance claimed to be due from the defendant to the plaintiffs for services in blasting rock in a cut along the line of the defendant’s road. There was a, dispute respecting the amount of work done, and the defense of payment was also set up by the defendant. There was testimony introduced on botli sides which tended to show the theories of each party, and the question of fact involved was submitted to the jury by the county judge. The defendant complains of the charge respecting the legal effect of the receipt, but the complaint is without cause. The receipt was for the money called for by the bill upon which it was rendered, and is not a receipt in full. The testimony respecting the circumstances under which it was given is contradictory, and was submitted to the jury. The judge refused to charge that the receipt was evidence of a final settlement, and that was 2’ighfc, 212 view of the evidence. It must now be assumed that the jury found in favor of the plaintiffs upon the question in dispute, and there being evidence to sufficiently support such finding, we cannot disturb the verdict upon that ground. We find no errors of law in the case, and the judgment and order denying tho motion for a new trial should be affirmed.

Brown, P. J., and Pratt, J., concurred.