Case ID: f-appx_646/html/0523-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lacey Mark SIVAK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Timothy D. WILSON; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 14-35877.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 15, 2016.
    
    Filed March 25, 2016.
    Lacey Mark Sivak, Boise, ID, pro se.
    Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Lacey Mark Sivak, an Idaho state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his request to file various actions. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the application of a vexatious litigant order. Moy v. United States, 906 F.2d 467, 469 (9th Cir.1990). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in revising a prior pre-filing order to conform to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and in applying the revised order to Sivak’s proposed actions.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.