Case ID: f2d_526/html/0552-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harold B. and Jean C. DAHL, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 74-3461.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Nov. 7, 1975.
    Mr. and Mrs. Harold Dahl in pro. per.
    Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gilbert E. Andrews, Chief, Appellate Section, Thomas Crowe, Atty., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent-appellee.
    
      
       Honorable Malcolm M. Lucas, United States District Judge for .the Central District of California, sitting by designation.
    
   OPINION

Before BROWNING and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and LUCAS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

In this review of a Tax*Court decision upholding a deficiency assessed under the imputed interest provisions of 26 U.S.C. § 483, we affirm for the reasons stated in the Tax Court opinion below. Harold B. & Jean C. Dahl, 43 P—H Tax Ct.Mem. 755 (1974). The Dahls were not entitled to a jury trial before the Tax Court. See Olshausen v. C. I. R., 273 F.2d 23, 28 (9th Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 363 U.S. 820, 80 S.Ct. 1256, 4 L.Ed.2d 1517 (1960).

Affirmed.