Case ID: sw3d_497/html/0270-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

C.K., Respondent, v. N.K., Appellant.
    No. ED 103313
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Filed: May 3, 2016
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 30, 2016
    Application for Transfer Denied September 20, 2016
    Steven A. Waterkotte, 7750 Clayton Road, Suite 209, St. Louis, MO 63117, Henderson & Waterkotte, P.C., Attorney for Appellant.
    Chase C. Kohler, Acting Pro Se, 4200 Lockport Drive, Bridgeton, MO 63044, Attorney for Respondent.
    Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

N.K. (“Appellant”) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County granting a full order of protection in favor of C.K. (“Respondent”) pursuant to the Adult Abuse Act, Sections 455.010 through 455.090, RSMo (Cum.Supp.2013) . Appellant asserts the trial court erred because the evidence was insufficient to support the full order of protection. Appellant argues that Respondent failed to prove Appellant’s actions caused alarm or substantial emotional distress to Respondent. Respondent did not file a respondent’s brief. We- have reviewed Appellant’s brief and the record on appeal, and we find the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015). 
      
      . The Adult Abuse Act was revised effective August 28, 2015; however, the prior version was still in effect at the time of the events in this case.