Case ID: f-appx_713/html/0219-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel H. KING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. T. SMITH, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 17-7433
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: February 20, 2018
    Decided: February 28, 2018
    
      Daniel H. King, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel H. King, a District of Columbia Code offender civilly committed under the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. King v. Smith, No, 5:16-hc-02291-D, 2017 WL 4621778 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 16, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED