Case ID: mont_269/html/0009-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. DANNY L. SEVERSON, Defendant.
    NO. 964
    DECISION
    
      DATED this 19th day of November, 1993.
   On July 23, 1993 the Defendant was sentenced to Count I, ten (10) years for Intimidation; Count II, ten (10) years for Disorderly Conduct; Count III, six (6) months for Assault; Count IV, six (6) months; said sentences shall be served consecutively; plus credit for 79 days time served; plus conditions.

On November 19,1993, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Defendant was present and was represented by Liz Honacker, Legal Intern from the Montana Defender Project. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

The reason for the decision is the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct pursuant to Section 46-18-904(3), MCA. The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to deem inadequate or excessive as required to overcome the presumption per Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

Hon. Thomas McKittrick, Chairman, Hon. G. Todd Baugh, Member and Hon. Robert Boyd, Alternate Member.

The Sentence Review Board wishes to thank Liz Honacker, Legal Intern from the Montana Defender Project for her assistance to the defendant and to this Court.