Case ID: so3d_228/html/1160-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Reiko V. HENRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D17-0404
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed July 24, 2017
    Reiko V. Henry, pro se, Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED as moot. See Toomer v. State, 895 So.2d 1256, 1256-57 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (“Where one is challenging the legality of his sentence or seeking jail credit against that sentence, and he completes the sentence during the pendency of the appeal, the appeal may be dismissed as moot.”).

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.