Case ID: f-appx_612/html/0192-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anthony E. WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CATERPILLAR LOGISTICS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 15-1062.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 28, 2015.
    Decided: Aug. 14, 2015.
    Anthony E.. White, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Forte Meddin, John Thomas Murray, Seyfarth Shaw, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.
    Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony E. White appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his racial discrimination and retaliation claims filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. White v. Caterpillar Logis tics, Inc., 67 F.Supp.3d 713 (E.D.N.C. 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       On appeal, White does not contest the district court's disposition of his racial harassment and failure to hire or promote claims. He has therefore forfeited appellate review of those claims. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Wahi v. Charleston Area Med. Ctr., Inc., 562 F.3d 599, 607 (4th Cir.2009) (limiting appellate review to arguments raised in the brief).