Case ID: misc_30/html/0767-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Isaiah Goldsmith, Appellant, v. Philip Sachs, Respondent.
    Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of Eew York, ninth district, borough of Manhattan.
    Otto H. Droege, for appellant.
    Jacob B. Engel, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The disputed questions of fact whether the note was transferred to the plaintiff before or after maturity and whether any consideration passed between the original parties, were resolved against the plaintiff, and the record presents nothing for our consideration warranting interference with the judgment.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Present: Freedman, P. J.; MacLean and Leventritt, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.