Case ID: so2d_820/html/1051-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Raul RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D01-3080.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 10, 2002.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Robfert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. B’utterworth, Attorney General, and Richard L. .Polin, Assistant Attorney General, and Esperanza Marie Tilgh-man, Certified Legal Intern, for appellee.
    Before GREEN, SORONDO, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

As we conclude that the evidence adduced at the probation revocation hearing was sufficient to support the trial court’s revocation of the appellant’s probation according to its oral pronouncements, we affirm the same. We do, however, remand for the trial court to enter a written order consistent with its oral pronouncements. See Cifuentes v. State, 717 So.2d 136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Taramona v. State, 707 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

Affirmed as modified.