Case ID: ad3d_68/html/0448-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Derek Boulware, Appellant.
    [888 NYS2d 882]
   The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations, including its rejection of defendant’s testimony that each of the two incidents was a drug-related transaction instead of a robbery.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, Renwick and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.