Case ID: f-appx_539/html/0752-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricky Alan REESE, aka Ricky A. Reese, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 11-30100.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Aug. 15, 2013.
    Filed Aug. 26, 2013.
    Stephan Alexander Collins, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Thomas Bradley, Jo Ann Far-rington, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Anchorage, AK, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Allison Elizabeth Mendel, Mendel & Associates, Anchorage, AK, for Defendant-Appellant.
    
      Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, BERZON and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
   MEMORANDUM

Reese admits he didn’t see the allegedly defective notice before trial, and doesn’t allege he would have accepted a plea agreement but for the erroneous sentencing information. He therefore hasn’t demonstrated that the alleged error “affected substantial rights.” United States v. Gonzalez-Aparicio, 663 F.3d 419, 428 (9th Cir.2011).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.