Case ID: nys_33/html/1130-10.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MEAD, Respondent, v. NEW YORK EL. R. CO. et al., Appellants.
    (Superior Court of New York City, General Term.
    May 6, 1895.)
    Action by Frederick Mead against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company.
    Davies & Rapallo (Julien T. Davies, Brainard Tolies, and J. C. Bushby, of counsel), for appellants.
    Evarts, Choate & Beaman (Joseph H. Choate, W. V. Rowe, and T. T. Sherman, of counsel), for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The awards herein are supported by a fair preponderance of evidence. The learned trial judge seems to have followed correct principles of law in the trial and determination of the issues raised. We have examined the case with care, and find no substantial reason for disturbing the decision of the court below. The judgment appealed from is affirmed, with costs.