Case ID: so3d_86/html/1158-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronel Orlando WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D10-3034.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    April 25, 2012.
    Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Karen E. Ehrlich, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melanie Dale Surber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Scott v. State, 66 So.3d 923, 930 (Fla.2011) (“[U]nder the ‘invited response’ doctrine, the State is permitted to emphasize uncontradicted evidence for the narrow purpose of rebutting a defense argument since the defense has invited the response.”) (citation and other internal quotations omitted).

TAYLOR, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.