Case ID: tex_36/html/0151-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Walker, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Leer & Hucherson v. William Sutherland.
    It is not competent for a court to enter up judgment by nil dicit for .coin, in > a suit on a promissory note that does not call for payment in coin ; but the judgment may be reformed by this court.
    Error from Navarro. Tried below before the Hon. F. P. Wood.
    There is no occasion for a statement of the facts.
    Winkler & Bulloch, for plaintiff in error.
    
      R. Q. Mills, for defendant in error.
   Walker, J.

The instrument sued on in this case does not call for payment in coin. The judgment is by nil dicit. The court rendered a judgment for coin, which must be reversed.

This court will render the judgment for dollars and cents, to be computed by the clerk.

Reformed.