Case ID: so2d_632/html/1152-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Winston Anthony SMITH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 93-2357.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 15, 1994.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Lucrecia R. Diaz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
    Before BARKDULL, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

As the State properly concedes, the written order of revocation of probation must conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement. Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of probation, but direct that the order be modified on remand to conform with the trial court’s oral pronouncement. Manuel v. State, 564 So.2d 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Roberts v. State, 512 So.2d 286 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).