Case ID: sw3d_47/html/0411-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert Joseph OLK, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Wendy Eversz OLK, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 78474.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    June 19, 2001.
    W. Morris Taylor; Gerald A. Sims; Clayton, MO, for appellant.
    John A. Turcotte, Jr.; Kimberly Bettis-worth; Diekemper, Hammond, Shinners, Turcotte, and Larrew, P.C.; St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Before MARY K. HOFF, Chief Judge and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, Judge and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Joseph Oik (husband) appeals from the circuit court’s judgment granting in part his motion to modify a dissolution decree.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error are without merit. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for them information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).