Case ID: ad_268/html/0226-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gida Nelson, Respondent, v. Margaret Brady, Doing Business Under the Name of The Ferncliff School of Individual Development, Appellant.
    First Department,
    October 20, 1944.
    
      Joseph L. Stein of counsel (Stem, Solomon & Simon, attorneys), for appellant.
    
      Aaron I. Schwartz for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

It was error for the court to place in evidence specimens of the plaintiff’s signature, made on the witness stand, for comparison by the jury with other disputed signatures. Signatures made under these conditions are in the nature of self-serving acts (People v. Molineux, 168 N. Y. 264; Hickory v. United States, 151 U. S. 303), which are only admissible at the instance of the adverse party. '

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Mastín, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untebmyeb and Does, JJ., concur.

. Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Settle order on notice.