Case ID: f_276/html/0108-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LUGO et al. v. BENITEZ et al.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
    November 1, 1921.)
    No. 1478.
    Appeal from the Supreme Court of Porto Rico.
    Action by Carlota Gonzalez Lugo and others against Jose J. Benitez and others. From a final judgment of the Supreme Court of Porto Rico, reversing a judgment of a District Court for plaintiffs, the latter appeal.
    Reversed and remanded, with directions.
    Asa P. French, of Boston, Mass., and Arturo Aponte, Jr., of Humacao, Porto Rico (Jose A. Poventud, of Ponce, Porto Rico, on the brief), for appellants.
    Henry G. Molina, of San Juan, Porto Rico (Francisco Gonzalez Fagundo, of Humacao, Porto Rico, on the brief), for appellees.
    Before BINGHAM, JOHNSON, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of the Supreme Court of Porto Rico, reversing a judgment of the District Court of Ponce.

The only question raised by the appeal is whether authorization to sell the property of minors can be given by the District Court of a district in which the property is not situated.

In Agenjo et al. v. Agenjo et al., 275 Fed. 105, handed down by us at this term, we have determined that question in the negative. Other questions were raised in the District Court and covered by its judgment. These were not dealt with by the Supreme Court. We do not pass upon them, but leave them to be dealt with after the case has been remanded.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is reversed, with costs to the appellants in this court, and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion, as amplified and explained by the opinion in Agenjo et al. v. Agenjo et al., supra.