Case ID: njl_99/html/0284-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOHN H. MARTIN, RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL W. DE YOUNG AND CHARLES GARLLIMUND, PARTNERS, TRADING UNDER THE FIRM NAME AND STYLE OF DE YOUNG & GARRLIMUND, AND LESTER WELSH, APPELLANTS.
    Submitted July 9, 1923
    Decided November 19, 1923.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court.
    Por the appellants, John A. Matthews (Groshen & Moriarity, on the brief).
    Por the respondent, Couli <£• Woodruff (Joseph Couli, Jr., of counsel).
   Per Curiam.

The plaintiff, John H. Martin, was injured in the same accident, as was the plaintiff, in No. 65 of the June term, 1923, and obtained a judgment against the same defendants, from which judgment the latter appealed to this court. The cases were tried together, and the same questions regarding alleged trial errors were involved and discussed on the appeal. Por the reasons given in the opinion filed in the ease of Osbun v. Samuel W. De Young et al., ante p. 204, the judgment in this case is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenohard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbacii, White, IIeppenheimer, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.