Case ID: f-supp_834/html/0632-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SAND, District Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Louis MIANO, Plaintiff, v. AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant. Michael R. WIDENER, Plaintiff, v. AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant. Morton WEINSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant.
    Nos. 91 Civ. 1280 (LBS), 91 Civ. 1676 (LBS) and 91 Civ. 3906 (LBS).
    United States District Court, S.D. New York.
    Aug. 19, 1993.
   ’ENDORSEMENT

SAND, District Judge.

The Orders of Magistrate Judge Katz of Feb. 25, 1993, 148 F.R.D. 68, and of May 6, 1993 are adopted and approved.

The Court finds no error in Judge Katz’s thoughtful and thorough opinion and ruling.

So Ordered.