Case ID: ohio-st-3d_82/html/0261-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bradley.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Bradley (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 261.]
    (No. 98-400
    Submitted April 21, 1998
    Decided June 24, 1998.)
    
      
      Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
    
      Mark H. Aultman, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We agree with the finding, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.