Case ID: ga-app_28/html/0116-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

12990.
    Davis v. The State.
    Decided January 18, 1922.
    Conviction of shooting at another; from Wilkes superior court — Judge Shurley. September 29, 1921.
    
      Norman & Norman, for plaintiff in error.
    
      M. L. Felts, solicitor-general, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

There is no merit in any of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial: there is ample evidence to support the finding of the jury, which has the approval of the trial judge, and the judgment is Affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, JJ., concur.