Case ID: nj_75/html/0199-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DAVID B. SCHUMM, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued December 13, 1977
    Decided January 5, 1978.
    
      Mr. Daniel J. Matyola argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Wharton, Stewart and Davis, attorneys; Mr. Martin L. Gilbert, on the brief).
    
      Mr. Simon L. Rosenbach argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Stephen B. Champi, Somerset County Prosecutor, attorney).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, 146 N. J. Super. 30.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes and Justices Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman, Clifford, Schreiber and Handler — 7.

For reversal — None.