Case ID: ohio-st-3d_74/html/0412-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. White, Appellant.
    [Cite as State v. White (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 412.]
    (No. 95-1746
    Submitted November 7, 1995
    Decided January 31, 1996.)
    
      Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Tina I. Ernst, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
    
      Carey White, pro se.
    
   Per Curiam.

We cannot tell from the limited record what claims appellant raised in the court of appeals. The gist of the issue raised in this court seems to be that appellate counsel was ineffective for failure to pursue a claim that a witness at trial may have committed perjury because she was offered immunity from prosecution for her testimony. We agree with the court of appeals that this claim is too speculative to raise a genuine issue.

Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.