Case ID: f-appx_668/html/0066-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael CROMWELL, a/k/a Mike Tyson, a/k/a Mikey, a/k/a Charlie, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-6599
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: August 18, 2016
    Decided: August 23, 2016
    Michael Cromwell, Appellant Pro Se, Joseph Evan DePadilla, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
    Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Cromwell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cromwell, No. 2:11-cr-00009-AWA-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legál contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED