Case ID: ohio-st-3d_87/html/1477-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

99-1960.
    State v. Moore.
   Fairfield App. No. 99CA24. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed October 25,1999, at page 2:

“Is the odor of burnt-marijuana, alone, sufficient to provide probable cause to search a defendant’s motor vehicle?”

F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., dissent.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 99-1855, State v. Moore, Fairfield App. No. 99CA24.

The conflict cases are State v. Younts (1993), 92 Ohio App.3d 708, 637 N.E.2d 64; and State v. Haynes (July 19, 1996), Portage App. No. 95-P-0007, unreported, 1996 WL 649167.