Case ID: pa-super_106/html/0486-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Davis, Appellant, v. Mundy et al.
    Argued October 11, 1932.
    Before Tbexler, P. J., Keller, Gawthrop, Cunningham, Baldbige, Stadteelu and Parker, JJ.
    
      Lynn L. Detweiler of Detweiler and Detweiler, for appellant.
    
      H. A. Barton and Swartz $ Campbell, for appellee.
    
      November 2, 1932:
   Pee Cueiam,

On March. 17, 1930, judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff in a. suit to recover damages resulting from a collision of two automobiles. On March 6, 1931, an attachment execution was issued thereon against the Employers Reinsurance Corporation of Kansas City, as garnishee, and answers to interrogatories were made, admitting certain matters, but denying liability. A rule for judgment against the garnishee on its answers was entered. The court discharged the. rule. The plaintiff appealed.

The order of the court is interlocutory, and we cannot consider it. The order is not appealable. Brendlinger v. Riegel, 37 Pa. Superior Ct. 474; Quaker City National Bank v. Brooks, 296 Pa. 501.

The appeal is quashed.