Case ID: f-appx_283/html/0149-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Preston HANCOCK, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Wendy BROWN, Case Manager Court Legal, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 08-6662.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 19, 2008.
    Decided: June 25, 2008.
    Preston Hancock, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Preston Hancock appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his complaint for failing to return a consent to the collection of fees form. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hancock v. Brown, No. 3:08-cv-00014-HEH (E.D.Va. Apr. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.