Case ID: so2d_578/html/1251-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

M.A. SPRADLIN v. DRENNEN CADILLAC COMPANY, INC., and Amerisure Insurance Company.
    1900043.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    April 11, 1991.
    M.A. Spradlin, pro se.
    Thomas A. Carraway and Deborah Alley Smith of Rives & Peterson, Birmingham, for appellee Drennen Cadillac Co., Inc.
    Terry McElheny and Sammye Oden Ray of Dominick, Fletcher, Yeilding, Wood & Lloyd, Birmingham, for appellee Amerisure Ins. Co.
   ON REHEARING EX MERO MOTU

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of April 5, 1991, is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor:

This appeal is dismissed because the appellant has failed to submit an argument that contains the “contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes, and parts of the record relied on.” See A.R.App.P. 28(a)(5) and Stephens v. Lindsey, 542 So.2d 278 (Ala.1989).

ORIGINAL OPINION WITHDRAWN; OPINION SUBSTITUTED; DISMISSED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and ALMON, ADAMS, STEAGALL and INGRAM, JJ., concur.