Case ID: f-appx_391/html/0614-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard Lee HELLMAN, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 09-50173.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 2, 2010.
    
    Filed Aug. 4, 2010.
    Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Nancy Spiegel, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    David E. Durchfort, Kosnett & Durch-fort, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Ap-pellee.
    Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, REINHARDT, Circuit Judge and WHYTE, District Judge.
    
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
    
      
       The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

The government failed to object below and hasn’t shown a “reasonable probability that [Heilman] would have received a different sentence but for the district court’s error.” United States v. Gonzalez-Zotelo, 556 F.3d 736, 741 (9th Cir.2009).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.