Case ID: f-appx_559/html/0591-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jose SOREQUE-SANDOVAL, Petitioner v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of United States, Respondent.
    No. 13-2299.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 27, 2014.
    Filed: April 4, 2014.
    Raymond Reza Bolourtchi, Cofinan & Bolourtchi, Ladue, MO, for Petitioner.
    Karen Yolanda Drummond, Richard M. Evans, Lori Warlick, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Mexican citizen Jose Soreque-Sandoval petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), upholding an immigration judge’s denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings, and denying his request to remand his case to - the immigration judge. Upon careful review, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s decision not to exercise its discretionary “sua sponte” authority to reopen the removal proceedings. See Tamenut v. Mukasey, 521 F.3d 1000, 1001, 1004-05 (8th Cir.2008) (en banc) (per curiam). We further conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion either in upholding the immigration judge’s determination that Soreque-Sandoval’s motion to reopen was untimely, see Valencia v. Holder, 657 F.3d 745, 748-49 (8th Cir.2011) (BIA did not abuse its discretion in upholding denial of untimely motion to reopen), or in denying his request for a remand, see Clifton v. Holder, 598 F.3d 486, 490-93 (8th Cir.2010) (denial of request for remand is reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.