Case ID: sw3d_204/html/0259-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael JACKSON, Appellant.
    No. ED 86773.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Sept. 5, 2006.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 11, 2006.
    Application for Transfer Denied Nov. 21, 2006.
    Irene Kams, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Jerome Jackson (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction by jury of two counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree. Defendant complains that the court plainly erred in allowing certain comments by the prosecutor during the opening statement and in allowing opinion testimony from a physician who examined the victim.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).