Case ID: ohio-st-3d_64/html/0035-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Columbus Bar Association v. Gaba.
    [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Gaba (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 35.]
    (No. 92-422
    Submitted April 15, 1992
    Decided June 17, 1992.)
    
      
      Bruce A. Campbell and Stanley D. Ross, for relator.
    
      Lawrence Charles Gaba, pro se.
    
   Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, we agree that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4), 6-101(A)(3), and 7-101(A)(1)-(3). We also agree with the sanction recommended by the board. Therefore, respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.