Case ID: del-cas_1/html/0012-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THOMAS RODNEY v. JOHN JONES.
    Supreme Court.
    April, 1793.
    
      Wilson’s Red Book, 7.
    
    
      
       This case is also reported in Read’s Notebook, 5.
      
    
   Court were divided about a witness. Ld.Raym. 494 cited to show, court divided cannot do a thing nor grant an order. Vide 3 Morg.Ess. 113, 179, Str. 139.

Defendant urged the bond was taken contrary to 2 Body Laws 343 and void, and cited 1 Bl.R. 517, Doug. 242, 2 Salk. 468; and that sole corporations cannot be obligees, 3 Bac.Abr. 696, 4 Co. 65, 1 Bac.Abr. 508.

Verdict for plaintiff for £[-j.

Reasons in arrest of judgment post hoc. 
      
       Blank in manuscript.