Case ID: ny_149/html/0607-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The Bank of America, Respondent, v. East River Silk Company, Appellant.
    
      Bank of America v. East River Silk Co., 90 Hun, 608, affirmed.
    (Argued May 25, 1896;
    decided June 9, 1896.)
    Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made November 15, 1895, which affirmed an order of the Special Term denying a motion to vacate an attachment.
    
      John Sabine Smith for appellant.
    
      Charles E. Rushmore for respondent.
   Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

All concur.