Case ID: f-appx_364/html/0594-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fred COOLER, a.k.a. Snap, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-13624
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Feb. 8, 2010.
    Fred Cooler, Forrest City, AR, pro se.
    Michelle Thresher Taylor, U.S. Attorney’s Office, TAMPA, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Before TJOFLAT, BIRCH and FAY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Clyde M. Collins, Jr., appointed counsel for Fred Cooler in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Cooler’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.