Case ID: okla-crim_26/html/0114-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BESSEY, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re OPINION OF THE JUDGES. In re HOYT HOWINGTON.
    No. A-5010.
    Opinion Filed Feb. 2, 1924.
    (222 Pac. 280.)
   Opinion of the Judges of the Criminal Court of Appeals in response to a request of the Governor relative to the conviction of Hoyt Howington of the crime of murder.

Honorable M. E .Trapp, Governor of the State of Oklahoma —Sir:

In response to your official communication of January 29, 1924, addressed to this court, asking for an opinion as provided in section 2786, Compiled Statutes 1921, in the matter of the conviction of Hoyt Howington of the crime of murder in the district court of Oklahoma county on the 24th day of January, 1924, by judgment of said court sentenced to be put to death by electrocution on the 4th day of April, 1924, within the walls of the state penitentiary at McAlester, we hereby respectfully submit the following opinion of the Judges:

BESSEY, J.

The record submitted by you is what is known under our practice as a case-made, a complete record of each successive action of th'e trial court at the trial, including the testimony taken. Prom this it appears that the person convicted has served written notice of his intention to appeal from the judgment of the trial court to this court, which under the Constitution and laws of this state he may do at any time within six months from January 24, 1924, and that steps have been taken to complete the appeal.

You are therefore advised that if the appeal is not lodged in this court before April 4, 1924, in order to accord the accused his statutory right to appeal within six months, the execution of the sentence of death should be postponed to some daté after July 24, 1924.

If in the meantime the appeal is perfected and filed in this court, that will automatically give the accused the right of a further suspension of the execution of sentence until the merits of the appeal are finally heard and determined.

MATSON, P. J., and DOYLE, J.. concur.