Case ID: ga-app_112/html/0622-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

40914.
    WRIGLEY et al. v. NOTTINGHAM.
    Decided November 9, 1965.
    
      Claude Hambrick, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Grant, Spears & Duckworth, William H. Duckworth, Jr., contra.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of this court in Wrigley v. Nottingham, 111 Ga. App. 404 (141 SE2d 859), having been reversed by the Supreme Court of Georgia in Nottingham v. Wrigley, 221 Ga. 386 (144 SE2d 749), the judgment of this court is vacated. The judgment of this court must be conformed to that of the Supreme Court. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is

Affirmed.

Bell, P. J., Jordan and Eberhardt, JJ., concur.