Case ID: ga-app_21/html/0544-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Luke, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

8640.
    Hattaway & Rambo v. Sanderlin.
    Decided January 21, 1918.
    Action for breach of contract; from Clay superior court — JudgeWorrill. December 3, 1916.
    
      Zach Arnold, E. B. Eing,.L: M. Bambo, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Ben M. Turnipseed, contra. ■
   Luke, J.

1. The court did not err in sustaining the objections to testimony, as complained of in the fourth, fifth, and sixth grounds of the ■ motion for a new trial.

2. The charge of the court, when read as a whole, fully and fairly submitted the issue's raised by the pleadings. There was evidence au- . thorizing the verdict; and the verdict having the approval of the trial judge, it was not error, for any of the reasons assigned, to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Jenhins, J., concur.