Case ID: sw3d_456/html/0079-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Joseph LAMPE, Appellant.
    No. ED 100995
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    
    Filed: February 24, 2015
    Matthew W. Huckeby, Assistant Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
    
      Adam S. Rowley, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
    Before Patricia L. Cohen, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Lampe (Defendant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis convicting him of four counts of possession of a controlled substance. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress and admitting at trial evidence obtained during an unlawful search and seizure.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).