Case ID: f-appx_510/html/0305-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Christopher BULLARD; Tony Ginor Sampson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Reuben Franklin YOUNG, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 12-7538.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 21, 2013.
    Decided: Feb. 25, 2013.
    Christopher Bullard, Tony Ginor Sampson, Appellants Pro Se.
    Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bullard v. Young, No. 5:12-ct-03093-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2012). We deny Appellants’ motion to compel an answer and for grant of motions filed in the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.