Case ID: ohio-st-3d_141/html/1459-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

2013-1804.
    Birdsall v. Miller.
   In Habeas Corpus. This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of petitioner’s requests for findings of faci/conclusions of law. It is ordered by the court that the requests are denied. The habeas petition was dismissed because petitioner was on parole, and parole constitutes detention for purposes of escape under R.C. 2921.34. See State v. Thompson, 102 Ohio St.3d 287, 2004-Ohio-2946, 809 N.E.2d 1134.