Case ID: cust-ct_35/html/0363-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Olivee, Chief Judge:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(V. D. 17)
    Manhattan Novelty Corp. et al. v. United States
    Entry No. 56536, etc.
    (Decided June 29, 1955)
    
      Lane,- Young <fc Fox (William H. Fox of counsel) for the plaintiffs.
    
      Warren E. Burger, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
   Olivee, Chief Judge:

These matters are presently before me on a remand from a classification proceeding decided by the first division of this court in Manhattan Novelty Corp. et al. v. United States, 33 Cust. Ct. 423, Abstract 58501. The judgment entered therein stated: “* * * that the matters be remanded to a single judge in reappraisement pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).”

The' matters have been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of the involved merchandise and that such values are as set forth in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof.

I further find such values to be the dutiable values of said merchandise.

The actions having been abandoned insofar as all other items of merchandise are concerned, to that extent they are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Schedule “A”