Case ID: kan_73/html/0793-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sarah G. Shattuck v. Belknap Savings Bank et al.
    
    No. 14,487.
    (83 Pac. 1116.)
    Error from Harvey district court; Peter J. Galle, judge.
    Opinion filed February 10, 1906.
    Affirmed.
    
      S. W. Shattuck, jr., for plaintiff in erro'r.
    
      Whitcomb & Hamilton, for defendants in error.
   Per Curiam:

On the authority of Kelso v. Norton, 65 Kan. 778, 70 Pac. 896, 93 Am. St. Rep. 308, and Henthorn v. Security Co., 70 Kan. 808, 79 Pac. 653, this case is affirmed. Under the uncontroverted facts, the only legal right, if any, the plaintiff has in the land in question is to redeem and have an accounting for rents.