Case ID: ga-app_21/html/0078-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

9144.
    Dowdell v. The State.
    Decided October 30, 1917.
   Broyles, P. J.

1. Under the facts of the case the court did not err in ' admitting in evidence, over the objections of the defendant, testimony as complained of in the 1st and 2d grounds of the -amendment to the motion for a new trial.

2. The venue of the offense was sufficiently proved. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth, J., concurs. Harwell, J., disqualified.

Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of LaGrange— Judge Harwell. July 31, 1917.

Arthur Greer, for plaintiff in error.

L. L. Meadors, solicitor, contra.