Case ID: minn_55/html/0367-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bank of Montreal vs. Peter Richter et al.
    
    Argued Oct. 25, 1893.
    Affirmed Nov. 29, 1893.
    No. 8355.
    Appeal by plaintiff, Bank of Montreal, from an order of the District ‘Court of Wadena County, (?. W. Holland, J., made April 9, 1893, denying its motion for a new trial.
    This action was brought against Peter Richter and nine others upon the two promissory notes, one for $DOO, and the other for $900 mentioned in the statement of the case in the foregoing action {ante, p. 362). The parties to this action were the same as In that. It was tried December 12, 1892. The pleadings, evidence and proceedings were, so far as legal questions were involved, similar to those in the preceding case. Defendants had a verdict. Plaintiff moved for a new trial, but was denied and it appeals.
    (Opinion published 57 N. W. Rep. 62.)
    
      A. G. Broker, for appellant.
    
      Goppernoll Willson, for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The same questions are presented, and the same conclusions' reached, as in the above case, ante, p. 362 (57 N. W. Rep. 61.)

Order affirmed.