Case ID: nj_43/html/0251-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per CüRIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ABRAHAM EPSTEIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. GRAND UNION COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued September 9, 1964
    Decided September 21, 1964.
    
      
      Mr. Bobert T. QuacTcenboss argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Burton, Seidman & Burton, attorneys).
    
      Mr. Albert W. Seaman argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Seaman, Williams & Seaman, attorneys).
   Per CüRIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WeiNTRaub, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, SOHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal and remandment for new trial as io damages only — Justice Hall — 1.