Case ID: us_195/html/0624-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      \n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 390.
    Seattle Dock Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Seattle and Lake Washington Waterway Company et al.; Cannel Coal Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Seattle and Lake Washington Waterway Company et al.
    and No. 391.
    In error to the Supreme Court of 'the State of Washington.
    Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted October 24,1904.
    Decided October 31, 1904.
    
      Mr. R. A. Ballinger, Mr. M. A. Ballinger„ Mr. J. T ot^ Mr Alfred Battle 
      for the plaintiffs in error.
   Per Curiam.

Judgments affirmed with costs.. New Orleans v. New Orleans Waterworks Company, 142 U. S. 79; Yesler v. Commissioners, 146 U. S. 646; Shively v. Bowlby, 152 U. S. 1; Allen v. Forrest, 8 Washington, 700; Mississippi Valley Trust Company v. Hafins, 20 Washington, 272, and these cases, 77 Pac. Rep. 845.

Mr. Julius F. Hale and Mr. Eugene Semple for defendants in error. v