Case ID: f-appx_197/html/0258-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert Junior WARDRICK, Petitioner—Appellant, v. WARDEN, Respondent—Appellee.
    No. 06-7110.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 24, 2006.
    Decided: Sept. 1, 2006.
    Robert Junior Wardrick, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Robert Wardrick, a federal inmate, appeals a district court order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Wardrick v. Warden, No. 1:06-cv-01274-AMD (D.Md. May 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials in the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED 
      
       To the extent Wardrick may be seeking authorization under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, challenging the search and seizure warrant, we deny authorization.