Case ID: so2d_591/html/0270-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Willie Lee HINES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 91-2058.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Oct. 9, 1991.
    Willie L. Hines, pro se.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carol Cobourn Asbury, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Although we agree with appellant that he was entitled to raise the alleged sentencing error by way of motion under Rule 3.800, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, we find the reasons given by the sentencing court in retaining jurisdiction over appellant’s sentence to be sufficient. Cf. Moore v. State, 392 So.2d 277 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.