Case ID: so3d_133/html/1174-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Silvana ECHEGUREN, et al., Appellants, v. CITIBANK, N.A., Appellee.
    No. 4D13-2931.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Feb. 27, 2014.
    Silvana Echeguren, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.
    Kathleen E. Angione and Roy A. Diaz of SHD Legal Group, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

This cause is summarily affirmed under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315, as the initial brief fails to present a preliminary basis for reversal. Specifically, the issues raised in the appellants’ brief relate to the 2009 final judgment of foreclosure and appellants’ motion to vacate same. The issues do not relate to the order resetting foreclosure sale, which is the subject of appellants’ notice of appeal.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.