Case ID: f-appx_316/html/0676-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Douglas R. BOESE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bill SLAUGHTER, Director MDOC; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 07-35313.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 18, 2009.
    
    Filed March 6, 2009.
    Douglas R. Boese, Deer Lodge, MT, pro se.
    Valerie D. Wilson, Esq., Department of Corrections, Helena, MT, David M. McLean, Esq., Browning Kaleczyc Berry & Hoven, Missoula, MT, for Defendants-Ap-pellees.
    Before BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Montana state prisoner Douglas R. Boese appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his medical needs. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Boese failed to create a triable issue of fact as to whether defendants were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs. See id. at 1054, 1057-58.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Boese’s motion to compel discovery because he did not demonstrate that additional discovery would have precluded summary judgment. See Corn-well v. Electro, Cent. Credit Union, 439 F.3d 1018, 1026 (9th Cir.2006).

Boese’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.