Case ID: so2d_633/html/1200-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George MYLES, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Appellee.
    No. 93-2457.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 29, 1994.
    George Myles, in pro per.
    Robin H. Greene, Miami, for appellee.
    Before NESBITT, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

George Myles appeals an order denying relief from judgment under Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.270(b). See Myles v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 590 So.2d 1053, 1054 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). The trial court was correct in its conclusion that the motion was untimely. See Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Miami, Inc. v. George Constr. .Corp., 153 So.2d 11, 12 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963) (construing similarly worded provision of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.38- [now Rule 1.540]); Legler v. Kwitney, Kroop & Scheinberg, P.A., 520 So.2d 95 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) (construing similarly worded provision of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540); see also Glatstein v. City of Miami, 391 So.2d 297, 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (same); Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Watson, 341 So.2d 1049, 1051 n. 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) (same). Assuming arguendo that the motion was timely filed, we see no reversible error in the trial court’s alternative ruling denying relief on the merits.

Affirmed.