Case ID: ga_121/html/0162-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Evans, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bradley v. The State.
    Submitted October 19, —
    Decided November 10, 1904.
    Indictment for murder. Before Judge Bartlett Paulding superior court. July 11, 1904.
    
      C. D. 'McGregor and A. J. Camp, for plaintiff in error.
    
      John C. Hart, attorney-general, and W. K. Fielder, solicitor-general, contra.
   Evans, J.

1. “Though the amendment to the motion for a new trial was ‘allowed,’ it does not appear that the trial judge approved or certified its grounds as true. The assignments of error therein can not be considered.” Sindy v. State, 120 Ga. 202.

2. ■ The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict; it has met with the approval of the trial judge; and as no error of law is made apparent, the judgment denying a hew trial is Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.