Case ID: misc_183/html/0599-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Solomon Sheiness, Respondent, v. Leon Tabbot, Defendant. Harry Deutscher et al., Third Parties, Appellants.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    December 12, 1944.
    
      Irving Fmkelstem for appellants.
    No appearance for respondent.
   Memorandum

Per Curiam.

It was error to permit the filing of plaintiff’s garnishee order nunc pro tunc after the third parties had filed their garnishee order.

The order should be reversed and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Hammer, Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.