Case ID: ohio-st-3d_91/html/1420-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DISCIPLINARY DOCKET
    96-985.
    Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer.
   This matter is pending before the court upon the filing by respondent of an application for termination of probation on June 14, 2000, and motion to consider termination of probation on December 6, 2000. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent’s motion be and hereby is granted to the extent that relator, Disciplinary Counsel, is ordered to show cause why he will not verify respondent’s compliance with the terms of probation.