Case ID: so2d_447/html/0382-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carrie MASTRONARDI a/k/a Carrie Turino, Appellant, v. CHASE FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company and Standard Fire Insurance Company, Appellees.
    No. 83-1215.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 13, 1984.
    McDermott, Will & Emery and J. Michael Fitzgerald, Miami, for appellant.
    Del Castillo & Knott, Coral Gables, for appellees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

In view of the factual issues presented, and the possibility that different reasonable inferences might be drawn even from the undisputed facts, a summary judgment for the defendant was improper. Dawson v. Scheben, 351 So.2d 367 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

Reversed and remanded.