Case ID: njl_71/html/0340-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LOUIS SCHLESINGER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. FREDERICK KESSELL, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    Argued June 20, 1904
    Decided December 9, 1904.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiff in error, Guild, Lum & Tamblyn.
    
    For the defendant in error, Charles F. Iierr.
    
   Per Curiam.

The nonsuit disclosed byr the record was sustained in the Supreme Court upon the authority of Stout v. Humphrey, 40 Vroom 436.

We think this conclusion correct, and the judgment must therefore he affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Dixon, Garrison, Pitney, Bogert, Tredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray. 9.

For reversal — None.