Case ID: ad3d_127/html/0668-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Pedro Santiago, Appellant.
    [7 NYS3d 890]
   Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), rendered June 19, 2012, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first and second degrees, grand larceny in the third and fourth degrees and four counts of criminal mischief in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. The evidence supported conclusions that defendant used force to retain control of a stolen van, and not merely to escape or to defend himself (see generally People v Gordon, 23 NY3d 643, 649-651 [2014]), and that, under the circumstances of its use, the van constituted a dangerous instrument (see People v Diaz, 129 AD2d 968 [4th Dept 1987], lv denied 70 NY2d 710 [1987]).

The court’s compromise Sandoval ruling, which allowed inquiry into a portion of defendant’s extensive record without elicitation of any underlying facts, balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion (People v Walker, 83 NY2d 455, 458-459 [1994]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur— Acosta, J.P., Saxe, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.