Case ID: ga_138/html/0737-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Fish, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gillespie et al. v. Ewing.
    September 27, 1912.
    Complaint. Before Judge Fite. Gordon superior court. June 21, 1911.
   Fish, C. J.

1. None of the exceptions taken to the instructions given to the jury, when considered in connection with the entire charge, required the grant of a new trial.

2. The evidence, though conflicting, authorized the verdict, and the refusal of a new trial will not he disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

F. A. Cantrell and Maddox, McCamy & Shumate, for plaintiffs in error. O. N. Starr, contra.