Case ID: nj-eq_66/html/0435-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James R. Mott, respondent, v. Rosa E. Rutter, appellant.
    [Argued December 1st, 1903.
    Decided February 29th, 1904.
    Filed March 1st, 1904.]
    On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Grey.
    
      Mr. John J. Crandall and Mr. Charles A. Baalce, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Charles E. Merritt and Mr. John B. Black, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Grey rendered in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixok, Garrisok, Port, Hekdricksok, Pitkey, Swayze, Bogert, Vredekburgh, Vroom, Greek, Gray — 12.

For reversal — None.