Case ID: nys_118/html/1128-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NICOUD, Respondent, v. NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    October 12, 1909.)
    Action by Rose L. Nicoud against the New York Life Insurance Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, because the findings of fact are inconsistent and irreconcilable. See Israel v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 158 N. Y. 624, 53 N. E. 517: Nickell v. Tracy, 184 N. Y. 386, 77 N. E. 391; City of Buffalo v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., 190 N. Y. 84, 82 N. E. 513, 16 L. R. A. (N. S.) 506. In this case the trial court has found all the controlling facts both ways.