Case ID: so2d_444/html/1027-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gerardo S. URCUYO, Appellant, v. Alvaro S. URCUYO, Appellee.
    No. 83-1479.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Jan. 17, 1984.
    Rehearing Denied Feb. 24, 1984.
    Thomson, Zeder, Bohrer, Werth, Adorno & Razook and Sanford L. Bohrer and Charles V. Senatore, Miami, Wachtell, Man-heim & Grouf and Robert Braunschweig, New York City, for appellant.
    Holland & Knight and John K. Aurell and Elizabeth W. McArthur, Tallahassee, for appellee.
    Before HENDRY, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order under review on the sole basis that the appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing this action between non-residents without prejudice to the appellant’s right to reinstate the action in a more convenient forum. We do not pass upon the other grounds for dismissal of the complaint or any count thereof recited in the trial court’s order, since we are of the view that these grounds, if renewed, must be resolved by the ultimate forum court.