Case ID: ga-app_31/html/0177-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Luke, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

14939.
    HAIR v. THE STATE.
    There was sufficient evidence to authorize the conviction.
    Decided November 15, 1923.
    Accusation of carrying concealed pistol; from city court of Black-shear—Judge Mitchell. July 14, 1923.
    
      Eldon L. Bowen, for plaintiff in error.
    
      B. Thomas Memory, solicitor, contra.
   Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon. His motion for a new trial, which was based upon the general grounds only, was overruled. The evidence was in conflict, but the jury believed, as they had a right to do, the evidence of the State, which authorized the defendant’s conviction. The trial judge approved the verdict. The motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.