Case ID: ny_183/html/0581-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bernard Cahill, Respondent, v. The City of Rochester, Appellant.
    (Argued January 15, 1906;
    decided January 30, 1906.)
    
      Cahill v. City of Rochester, 96 App. Div. 557, affirmed.
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 14, 1904, affirming a judgment iii favor 'of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
    
      William W. Webb, Corporation Counsel (John M. Stull of counsel), for appellant.
    
      Henry R. Glynn and Harvey F. Remington for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion;

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Yann, Werner and Willard Bartlett, JJ; Not sitting : Hiscock, J.