Case ID: njl_136/html/0635-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

EDWARD A. MURPHY, RESPONDENT, v. HOMER C. ZINK, ETC., APPELLANT.
    Submitted October 31, 1947
    Decided January 29, 1948.
    For the appellant, Walter D. Van Riper, Attorney-General.
    For the respondent, Milton, McNulty & Augelli (Anthony T. Augelli, of counsel).
   Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Burling in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Donges, Heher, Colie, Eastwood, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.