Case ID: sw3d_75/html/0310-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nathan A. EGGEMEYER, Sr., Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 79870.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    May 14, 2002.
    Nancy A. McKerrow, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Audara L. Charlton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nathan A. Eggemeyer, Sr. (Movant), appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief after an evidentia-ry hearing. Movant contends the motion court erred in denying his postconviction motion in that Movant’s trial counsel was ineffective for failing to (1) depose Trooper William Conway, (2) properly subpoena Trooper Conway, and (3) request a continuance upon Trooper Conway not appearing at trial.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).