Case ID: va-cir_5/html/0051-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "By JUDGE WILLARD I. WALKER", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
    J. West Construction Co., Inc. v. Fidelity and Deposit Co. et al.
    April 16, 1982
    Case No. LE-572
   By JUDGE WILLARD I. WALKER

After considering the pleadings, arguments and memoranda of this case, I hold that defendants' demurrers be sustained with prejudice.

The plaintiff's motion for judgment fails to state a cause of action on which relief can be granted against either defendant. There is no duty owed by either defendant to the plaintiff. The plaintiff had a contract with the general contractor, not with the owner or the architect. The plaintiff’s proper action is against the general contractor, not the architect and/or owner. Plaintiff alleges that since the owner retained the right to approve or disapprove of the subcontractor, the owner is legally obligated to notify the subcontractor of the general contractor's default. I know of no legal precedent for this theory and none, has been cited to me. As to the architect, his duty runs to the owner with whom he has a contract and not to the subcontractor.

For the foregoing reasons, the demurrers are sustained with prejudice.