Case ID: so2d_282/html/0034-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Melton Dadjad BLACKMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 73-256.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Aug. 15, 1973.
    James A. Gardner, Public Defender, Bradenton, and Thomas A. Capelle, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We feel that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is, therefore, dispensed with pursuant to Rule 3.10(e), F. A.R., 32 F.S.A.

Affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.