Case ID: fla_100-2/html/1366-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

W. E. Wright, Plaintiff in Error, v. S. H. Tatarian and W. E. Wright & Company, a Florida Corporation, Defendants in Error.
    
    Special Division A.
    Decision filed November 24, 1930.
    
      Thompson & Thompson and C. C. Youmans, for Plaintiffs in Error;
    
      Huber, Blackwell & Gray, for S. H. Tatarian, one of the Defendants in Error.
   Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, arid briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed on the authority of Crackwaner v. Carlton Natl. Bank, 98 Fla. 792, 124 So. R. 275, and Edgar v. Bacon, 97 Fla. 679, 122 So. R. 107.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J,, concur.