Case ID: ad3d_129/html/1077-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Barbara Falabella, Respondent, v Adam Belits, Appellant.
    [10 NYS3d 875]
   Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Linda M. Boggio, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated November 21, 2013. The order, after a hearing, granted the mother’s petition for sole custody of the subject child, and denied the father’s petition for sole custody of the child.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

“The court’s paramount concern in any custody dispute is to determine, under the totality of the circumstances, what is in the best interests of the child” (Matter of Gooler v Gooler, 107 AD3d 712, 712 [2013] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 171 [1982]). Custody determinations turn in large part on assessments of the credibility, character, temperament, and sincerity of the parties, and such assessments by the Family Court should not be disturbed unless they lack a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Picado v Doan, 90 AD3d 932 [2011]; Matter of Manfredo v Manfredo, 53 AD3d 498 [2008]).

Here, the Family Court’s determination that the best interests of the subject child would be served by awarding sole custody to the mother is supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record, and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Aaron W. v Shannon W., 96 AD3d 960, 961 [2012]; Matter of Laura A.K. v Timothy M., 204 AD2d 325, 326 [1994]).

Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Cohen and Duffy, JJ., concur.