Case ID: nj_8/html/0085-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PENNSYLVANIA-READING SEASHORE LINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
    Argued October 15, 1951
    Decided October 22, 1951.
    
      Mr. John Lloyd, Jr., argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Lloyd & Horn, attorneys).
    
      Mr. Frank A. Mathews, Jr., argued the cause for the respondents (Mr. Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney-General).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Eastwood in the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

For affirmance—Chief- Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Case, Waoheneeld, Burling and Ackerson—5.

For reversal—None.