Case ID: ohio-st-3d_2/html/0011-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dayton Bar Association v. Moore.
    [Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Moore (1982), 2 Ohio St. 3d 11.]
    (D.D. No. 82-23
    Decided November 24, 1982.)
    
      
      Mr. James Weprin, for relator.
   Per Curiam.

After a careful examination and review of the record in this cause, this court concurs with the findings and conclusions of the board that respondent violated DR 6-101(A)(l), DR 6-101(A)(3), and DR 7-101(A)(2).

It is the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.