Case ID: ad2d_52/html/0839-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary J. Handal et al., Respondents, v Rushmore Products, Inc., Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)
   In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 3, 1975, which denied its motion to vacate a prior order of the same court, dated October 25, 1972, which dismissed its defense of the Statute of Limitations. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. In our view, defendant failed to show a reasonable excuse for its default. Accordingly, it is not entitled to vacatur thereof (see CPLR 5015, subd [a]). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Damiani, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.