Case ID: sw3d_509/html/0804-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Denise JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 103708
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    Filed: October 25, 2016
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 10, 2017
    Application for Transfer Denied February 28, 2017
    
      Timothy J. Fomeris, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Richard A. Starnes, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Lisa Van Amburg, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Denise Jackson appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 24. 035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous, and we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).