Case ID: ad3d_142/html/1341-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Reginald O. Pierce, Appellant.
    [38 NYS3d 460]
   Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Christopher J. Burns, J.), rendered June 19, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [2]) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (§ 265.02 [1]). Initially, we note that, “[b]y pleading guilty, defendant forfeited review of [Supreme] Court’s Molineux ruling” (People v Brown, 305 AD2d 1068, 1068 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 579 [2003]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the court properly refused to suppress his statements to the police inasmuch as the record establishes that defendant spoke “freely and unguardedly” in the presence of two different police officers after voluntarily waiving his Miranda rights (People v Cascio, 79 AD3d 1809, 1811 [2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 893 [2011]; see People v Carbonaro, 134 AD3d 1543, 1547-1548 [2015], lv denied 27 NY3d 994 [2016], reconsideration denied 27 NY3d 1149 [2016]; People v Collins, 43 AD3d 1338, 1339 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 1005 [2007]). Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Present — Smith, J.P., Peradotto, DeJoseph, Troutman and Scudder, JJ.