Case ID: nys_73/html/1131-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. VAN BRUNT, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CATTANO, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    December 6, 1901.)
    Action by Frank Cattano, as administrator of the estate of Paul Cattano, against the Metropolitan Street Railway Company. From a judgment for the plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals. C. F. Brown, for appellant. R. Foster, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed.

VAN BRUNT, P. J.

I dissent. The plaintiff seems to have been thrown from the front platform of the car in some way by the putting on of the brake. If it was caused by the people pressing too closely to the driver, so that he struck them in putting on the brake, I do not see that there was any negligence shown on his part. If the crowded state of the platform made it dangerous for the deceased to ride there, it seems to me that that danger was just as evident to him as it was to the officials in charge of the car. I am unable to see in what the negligence of the defendant consists.