Case ID: f2d_867/html/1330-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Leyda HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The HERTZ CORPORATION, Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alejandro HERNANDEZ, Third Party Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 88-5415.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    March 15, 1989.
    Roland Gomez, Miami Lakes, Fla., for defendant-third party plaintiff-appellant.
    Terry L: Redford, Thornton, David & Murray, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.
    Before TJOFLAT and JOHNSON, Circuit Judges, and BROWN , Senior Circuit Judge.
    
      
       Honorable John R. Brown, Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM:

The appeal in this case is patently frivolous; moreover, the appellant knew that the appeal was frivolous when it was filed. The appeal is dismissed. On receipt of our mandate, the district court shall award the appellee any damages caused by the appeal, including a reasonable attorney’s fee. The appellee is also awarded double costs. See Fed.R.App.P. 38; Collins v. Amoco Production Company, 706 F.2d 1114 (11th Cir.1983).

DISMISSED.