Case ID: f-appx_637/html/0960-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Andrew Michael CHRISTENSEN, Defendant-Appellant.
    Nos. 15-2425, 15-2426.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 22, 2016.
    Filed: March 2, 2016.
    John E. Beamer, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Des Moines, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    
      Andrew Michael Christensen, White Deer, PA, pro se.
    Timothy S. Ross-Boon, Assistant, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Des Moines, IA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

While Andrew Christensen was concurrently serving two periods of supervised release on federal criminal sentences, he admitted to the district court that he had violated his release conditions in both cases. The court revoked both supervised release terms, and imposed concurrent revocation sentences of 24 months in prison and 12 months of supervised release. On appeal, Christensen contends that the revocation sentences are substantively unreasonable. Upon careful review of the record, including the court’s weighing of relevant sentencing factors at the revocation hearing, we find no basis to conclude that the court abused its discretion. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-16 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review). The judgment is affirmed, and we grant counsel leave to withdraw. 
      
      . The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.