Case ID: nj-eq_99/html/0455-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

M. Casewell Heine et al., receivers, &c., respondents, v. Charles R. Hayden et al., appellants.
    [Decided February 1st, 1926.]
    On appeal from an order of the court of chancery advised hy Vice-Chancellor Baches, whose opinion is reported in 98 N. J. Fq. 88, under the name of Stand er v. Sims-Magneto Oo.
    
    
      Mr. William Harris, for the respondents.
    
      Messrs. Lum, Tamblyn &Colyer, for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baches.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchaed, Pabkek, Mintubn, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Kalisch, White, Gaednee, JJ. 3.