Case ID: ohio-law-abs_5/html/0826-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "LOBINSON, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LINK v. HILL.
    Ohio Supreme Court.
    No. 20413.
    Decided Dec. 14, 1927.
    Error to Hamilton Appeals.
    Judgment reversed.
    297. CONTRACTS — Implication that agreement to pay, upon sale of certain property, is agreement to pay within reasonable time,, does not obtain where facts and circumstances preclude such intention.
   LOBINSON, J.

The implication that.an agreement to repay upon the sale of certain property is an agreement to repay within a reasonable time, without the sale of the property, does not obtain where the facts and circumstances relative to the entering into such agreement preclude the existence of any such intention on the part of the contracting parties at such time.

(Marshall, CJ., Allen, Kinkade and Matthias, JJ., concur. Day and Jones, JJ., dissent.)