Case ID: ohio-st_101/html/0507-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "By the Court.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Shaw v. The State of Ohio.
    
      Constitutional law — State Medical Act — Section 1269 et seq., General Code — Practitioners in limited branches — Examinations.
    
    (No. 16335
    Decided January 13, 1920.)
    Error to the Court of Appeals of Summit county.
    
      Messrs. Holloway & Chamberlin, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Mr. C. G. Roetsel, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. W. A. Spencer, assistant prosecuting attorney, for defendant in error.
   By the Court.

After the present case was decided, and before the opinion was prepared, the case of Nesmith v. State, ante, 158, was argued and submitted.

In all essential respects the same questions were raised, but more fully argued by counsel for the plaintiff in error in the Nesmith case than in the present case. The court therefore delayed the opinion in the Shaw case until after the Nesmith case, supra, had been fully considered and decided, and the opinion prepared.

We hold that there was no error in the ruling of the courts below, and that substantial justice has been done.

The judgment of the court of appeals is therefore affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Nichols, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Johnson, Wanamaker and Merrell, JJ., concur.

Robinson, J.,- not participating.