Case ID: sw2d_839/html/0387-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lonzo BARBER, Appellant.
    No. 60804.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Nov. 3, 1992.
    John Klosterman, Jeannie Arterburn, St. Louis, for appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Joan F. Edwards, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Lonzo Barber (Defendant) appeals from his conviction for kidnapping and first degree robbery. We affirm per Rule 84.16(b). The verdict is supported by the evidence, and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.