Case ID: so2d_573/html/1023-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronald WORLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 90-00490.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Feb. 1, 1991.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Elaine L. Thompson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Consistent with our decisions in Lewis v. State, 574 So.2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) and Scott v. State, 574 So.2d 247 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), we hold the trial court erred in multiplying the points for legal constraint by the number of new offenses committed by appellant while on probation to arrive at appellant’s presumptive guidelines sentence. Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s sentence and remand for correction of the scoresheet and resentencing.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.