Case ID: ky_14/html/0010-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Judge Mills.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MORREL vs. BARNER, &c.
    
      From the Logan Circuit Court.
    
    
      Crittenden, for appellant; Monroe and Sharp, for appef-Ices.
    Oct. 7.
    If the judgment is a-gains.t one, & the execution on it and re-plevin bond against two, both ought to be quashed.
   Opinion op the Court, by

Judge Mills.

2 3 c-f- (t, O £ C3 O cr co O CD 3 2. S3 C3 -« to C5 -C O rj c O -w £3 to § C2 §3 ri 'TS O .2* P cr P o gj*f o* •‘'error 'coram vobis, One, at least, of the errors assi-gn-''éd' in'that court, if true, was sufficient to quash the execution and bond, to. wit, that the execution issued against’two persons, both of whom had joined in the re-plevin, when the original judgment'was against one only. - There is no exception tothe opinion of the court-, nor is the judgment produced to show that this error is false." Of-course, we must’presume thqtthe court be-ibw.did right in deciding'as it'has done.,

The court of-appeals must presume that error sufficient in law to hare quashed an execution, did not exist in fact, if the inferior court overruled the motion to quash, & the transcript of the record does not show that the error tsxistqd in. fact.

''Tfie judgment must, therefore, be-affirmed with costs.