Case ID: sw3d_436/html/0254-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Interest of A.L.S., Appellant, v. JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent.
    No. WD 76904.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    July 15, 2014.
    Patricia A. Harrison, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Daniel G. Barry and Edward E. Moore, Kansas City, MO, for respondent.
    Before Division Four: ALOK AHUJA, Chief Judge, Presiding, CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge and WAYNE P. STROTHMANN, Special Judge.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

A.L.S., a juvenile, appeals from the trial court’s judgment sustaining the Juvenile Officer’s petition, finding that he committed acts that would have constituted resisting arrest if committed by an adult. On appeal, A.L.S. argues that the trial court erred in sustaining the petition because there was insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he knew or reasonably should have known that a law enforcement officer was trying to stop, detain, or arrest him, and that he resisted by fleeing from the officer. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).