Case ID: nj-eq_94/html/0494-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph M. W. Kitchen, complainant, v. John O. H. Pitney et al., defendants.
    [Decided February 1st, 1923.]
    On appeal of Harriet Crigler Wright et al.
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Fielder, whose opinion is reported in 94 N. J. Eq. 485.
    
    
      Messrs. McCarter ,& English, for the complainant.
    
      Messrs. Howe <£• Davis, Messrs Lum, Tmiblyn .& Colyer and Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Skinner, for the defendants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

For affirmance — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbaci-i, White, PIeppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—14. • . ■

For reversal—None.