Case ID: ga-app_7/html/0712-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "TTtt.t, O. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

2299.
    Bryan v. Yates.
   TTtt.t, O. J.

Where a deed to land described the quantity of acres conveyed as being “80 acres, more or less, ” and there was an alleged' shortage of 26 acres, it was for the jury, and not for the court, to say whether this deficiency was so gross as to authorize a rescission of the contract, or an apportionment of the purchase-price, under §3542 of the Civil Code. - Judgment reversed.

Complaint; from city court of Moultrie — Judge McKenzie. Hovember 13, 1909.

Submitted February 33,

Decided May 12, 1910.

Shipp & Kline, for plaintiff in error.

Branch & Snow, James Humphreys, contra.