Case ID: sw2d_936/html/0866-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Donald SCHULZ, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 70311.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Jan. 7, 1997.
    Emmett D. Queener, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for movant-appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay)' Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).