Case ID: f-appx_57/html/0172-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Fatoumata O. CONTE, Petitioner, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE; John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Respondents.
    No. 02-1672.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 7, 2003.
    Decided March 12, 2003.
    
      John T. Riely, Bethesda, Maryland, for Petitioner. Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Carl H. McIntyre, Jr., Senior Litigation, John L. Davis, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
    Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Fatoumata O. Conte seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) decision and order affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s denial of her second motion to reopen immigration proceedings, which she labeled as a “Motion to Accept the Affirmative Application for Relief Nunc Pro Tunc.” We have reviewed the administrative record and the immigration judge’s decision, which was designated by the Board as the final agency determination, and find no abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 3.2(a) (2002); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny Conte’s petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.