Case ID: so3d_271/html/0128-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Isiah GRIFFIN, Appellee.
    No. 3D14-2460
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed March 13, 2019
    Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.
    Rasco Klock Perez & Nieto, and Joseph P. Klock, Jr. and Hilton Napoleon, II, Coral Gables, for appellee.
    Before SALTER , LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.
    
      
      Did not participate in oral argument.
    
    
      
      Did not participate in oral argument.
    
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Born-Suniaga v. State, 256 So.3d 783, 786 (Fla. 2018) (holding that the State is not entitled to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(p)'s recapture period when the State terminates prosecution and files new charges based on the same conduct before speedy trial period expires, but fails to notify the defendant of new charges until after expiration of speedy trial period).