Case ID: sw3d_495/html/0224-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anthony WINGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 103518
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Filed: July 26, 2016
    Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.
    Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P. J. and Mary K. Hoff and Roy L. Richter, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Wings appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).