Case ID: ad2d_155/html/0243-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Cowen & Company et al., Appellants, v Jeffrey M. Anderson, Respondent.
   — Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Saxe, J.), entered March 28, 1989, in this CPLR article 75 proceeding, denying a stay of arbitration, is unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The parties, the respondent customer demanding arbitration and the petitioners’ stock broker and representative, agreed to arbitration "in accordance with the rules [of] * * * the American Stock Exchange”. The rules allow a customer to select arbitration before the American Arbitration Association. This was done, and nothing in the agreement between the parties limited the arbitration to the American Stock Exchange. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Asch, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ.