Case ID: pa_588/html/0661-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

906 A.2d 531
    AUH-HAHNEMANN, Petitioner, v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (Ersie ABEJO), Respondents.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    July 27, 2006.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of July 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is denied.

Mr. Justice Saylor dissents, as he views the Commonwealth Court’s present holding, which precludes Employer from requesting an IRE based upon its failure to make such a request within the sixty-day time limitation of Section 306(a.2)(l), see 77 P.S. 511.2(1), as inconsistent with the reasoning of Gardner v. WCAB (Genesis Health Ventures), 585 Pa. 366, 382-84, 888 A.2d 758, 768 (2005).