Case ID: f-appx_599/html/0061-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jerome W. JAMES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carl JONES, FSD; Manuel Alfas, FSS; Jennifer Butler, FSS; Annette Chapman, FSS; Vernon Gore, FSS; Earnest Deloach, FSS, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 14-7630.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 16, 2015.
    Decided: March 31, 2015.
    Jerome Will James, Appellant Pro Se. Elloree Ann Ganes, Hood Law Firm, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerome W. James appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, and its subsequent order denying his motion to alter or amend judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. James v. Jones, No. 0:13-cv-01869-DCN, 2014 WL 3867813 (D.S.C. Aug. 6, 2014; Oct. 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.