Case ID: sw_157/html/0479-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HARPER, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SPENCER v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    May 21, 1913.)
    Criminal Law (§ 1097) — Appeal—Record— Statement of Facts — Necessity.
    The denial of a motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence cannot be reviewed on appeal, in the absence of a statement of facts.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2862, 2864, 2926, 2934, 2938, 2939, 2941, 2942, 2947; Dec. Dig. § 1097.]
    Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; Robt. B. Seay, Judge.
    Ed. Spencer was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    
      
      For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key-No. Series & Rep’r Indexes
    
   HARPER, J.

Appellant was convicted of burglary, and his punishment assessed at four years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The only ground in the motion for a new trial assigns that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence. No statement of facts accompanies the record; consequently we cannot review this ground.

The judgment is affirmed.