Case ID: f-appx_88/html/0201-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Theresa LIECHTI, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. OMNI HOTELS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant—Appellee. Theresa Liechti, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Omni Hotels Management Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 02-57080, 02-57159.
    D.C. No. CV-01-06247-ER.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 2, 2004.
    
    Decided Feb. 19, 2004.
    Lenton Aikins, Esq., The Aikins Law Firm, Long Beach, CA, Dilip Vithlani, Norwalk, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant/Plaintiff-Appellee.
    John P. Zaimes, Esq., Candis Watson Bowles, Weston, Benshoof, Rochefort, Rubalcava and Mac Cuish, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee/DefendantAppellant.
    Before KOZINSKI, O’SCANNLAIN, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

The surveillance by closed circuit television was insufficient to create a hostile working environment, and Omni Hotels Management Corporation took prompt action. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district court’s grant of summary judgment. Because we affirm the summary judgment, we need not reach the issues raised by the cross-appeal. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.