Case ID: kan_66/html/0812-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Peter Everhardy v. H. W. Wulfekuhler, etc.
    No. 13,084.
    (72 Pac. 1099.)
    Error from Leavenworth district court; J. H. Gtllpatrick, judge.
    Opinion filed April 11, 1903.
    Affirmed.
    
      F. P. Fitzwilliam, and C. P. Middleton, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Atwood c6 Hooper, and. J. H. Wendorff, for defendant in error.
   Per Curiam:

This was an application to interplead in in a garnishment proceeding. It appears that when the application was made all litigated questions between the original parties had been fully adjusted and settled, and there were no questions pending. The application to interxilead was refused. In this we discover no error,

The judgment is affirmed.