Case ID: ga-app_22/html/0273-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

9614.
    Crump v. The State.
    Decided May 1, 1918.
    Accusation of possessing intoxicating liquor; from city court of Macon—Judge Guerry. February 20, 1918.
    
      Nottingham & Holliman, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Will Gunn, solicitor, contra.
   Broyles, P. J.

1. When considered in connection with the qualifying notes of the trial judge, there is no substantial merit in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

■Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworfh and Harwell, JJ., concur.