Case ID: so2d_263/html/0253-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alfred A. COSENTINO and David B. Gam, d/b/a Cosentino and Gam, Engineers, Appellants, v. Jerome ELSON and Heiman and Crary, P.A., Appellees.
    No. 72-41.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 20, 1972.
    Robert J. Ramer, Coral Gables, for appellants.
    
      Heiman & Crary and Charles L. Neu-stein, Miami, for appellees.
    Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The order of the trial court, here under review, be and the same is hereby affirmed. Funds in escrow are not subject to garnishment [see: 6 Am.Jur.2d, Attachment and Garnishment, § 125; 28 Am.Jur.2d, Escrow, § 10; 38 C.J.S. Garnishment § 77c(l); Anno. 10 A.L.R. 741] except where all conditions of the escrow had been completed and the funds without dispute are due to a judgment debtor.

Affirmed.