Case ID: so2d_892/html/1167-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Interest of K.P. and D.P., children. T.P. and D.P., Appellants, v. Department of Children and Family Services, Appellee.
    No. 2D04-947.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Feb. 2, 2005.
    Rehearing Denied March 1, 2005.
    Heather M. Gray, Riverview, for Appellant T.P.
    Michael P. Maddux & Alyssa L. Katz of Michael P. Máddux, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant D.P.
    Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Christopher Perone, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Ap-pellee.
   PER CURIAM.

T.P. (the Mother) and D.P. (the Father) appeal the trial court’s order adjudicating their daughter, K.P., and their son, D.P. to be dependent. The Department of Children and Family Services properly concedes that the adjudication of D.P. as dependent is not supported by competent, substantial evidence with respect to the Mother. We reverse the adjudication of D.P. to be dependent with respect to the Mother only. We affirm the order under review in all other respects.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

SALCINES, STRINGER, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.