Case ID: nc_203/html/0667-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Connor, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IRA VANCE and S. C. VANCE, Administrators of T. B. VANCE, v. ERNEST VANCE and Others, Heirs at Law of T. B. VANCE, Deceased.
    (Filed 14 December, 1932.)
    Executors and Administrators E d — Within twenty days from sale of land to make assets clerk may order resale under statutory provisions.
    ■Where in a special proceeding before the clerk the intestate’s lands have been sold to make assets, the statute requires the clerk to order a resale if an increased bid according to the provisions of the statute is made within ten days, and after the expiration of the ten days and before the expiration of the twenty days which must elapse before confirmation, the question of resale is one within the clerk’s discretion, C. S., 763, 2591, and the last and highest bidder at the sale being merely a proposed purchaser prior to confirmation, is not a party and has no right to object to the clerk’s discretionary order of resale.
    Appeal by plaintiffs from Moore, J., at April Term, 1932, of Aveet.
    Reversed.
    This is a special proceeding for the sale of land for assets, begun and pending before the clerk of the Superior Court of Avery County.
    On 21 December, 1931, the commissioner appointed by the court in an order theretofore made in the proceeding, filed his report of a sale made by him pursuant to an order for the resale of the lands described in the petition, at which E. 0. Guy was the last and highest bidder in the sum of $5,000.
    On 1 January, 1932, an order was made in the proceeding in words as follows:
    “Whereas Faucette Company, Incorporated, has filed a five per cent bid on the purchase money, paid for the above described land, and has paid the same to me,
    Now, therefore, it is ordered, considered and adjudged that J. W. Ragland, commissioner, advertise said land for resale fifteen days in some newspaper published in Avery County, as provided by law.
    This 1 Januáry, 1932. Eugene Elleb, clerk Superior Court.”
    
    
      E. C. Guy, tbe last and bigbest bidder at tbe sale reported by tbe commissioner, objected to said order, and upon bis objection being overruled, appealed therefrom to tbe judge of tbe Superior Court.
    Thereafter, at April Term, 1932, judgment was entered in tbe proceeding, in words as follows:
    “Tbe above entitled action coming on for bearing at tbe present term upon appeal from an order of tbe clerk made herein, refusing to confirm tbe sale of tbe lands involved made by tbe commissioner appointed herein, and directing a resale of said land by said commissioner; and it appearing to tbe court, and tbe court finding as a fact that tbe sale of said land was duly made and reported; that no raised bid was made and filed within tbe time provided by law, to wit: Said raised bid was not made ten days after said sale:
    It is, therefore, on motion of W. C. Berry, attorney, considered, ordered and adjudged by tbe court that tbe order of the clerk, refusing to confirm said sale and ordering a resale of said lands, be and tbe same is hereby overruled; and tbe commissioner is hereby ordered and directed to make, execute and deliver a deed for said land to tbe purchaser upon bis compliance with tbe terms of bis bid.
    Waltee E. Moore, Judge Presiding."
    
    From tbe foregoing judgment tbe plaintiffs appealed to tbe Supreme Court.
    
      Charles Hughes for plaintiffs.
    
    
      W. C. Berry for E. C. Guy.
    
   Connor, J.

In Parker v. Dickinson, 196 N. C., 242, 145 S. E., 231, it is said: “Until a judicial sale has been confirmed, the purchaser is a mere preferred proposer. Confirmation is an act of consent and approval which the court gives to tbe sale, and for all practical purposes, tbe court is the vendor in such cases, and within the limitations prescribed by law, may give or withhold its consent in its discretion. Harrell v. Blythe, 140 N. C., 415, 53 S. E., 232.”

In the instant case, the clerk bad no power to confirm the sale reported by the commissioner until the expiration of twenty days from the date on which the report was filed. C. S., 763. If within ten days from the date of the sale, the bid bad been increased five per cent, and this amount paid to the clerk, it would have been the duty of the clerk to order a resale. Tbe clerk would have bad no discretion, in that case, as to whether be should make the order. C. S., 2591. But notwithstanding ten days bad elapsed from the date of the sale, at the time the increased bid was made, the clerk bad the power, in bis discretion, to order a resale, without waiting for the expiration of twenty days within which parties to the proceeding might file exceptions to the sale. During this time E. C. Guy, the purchaser at the sale was not a party to the proceeding, and therefore had no right to appear and object to the order of resale. He had no right to appear and move in the proceeding until the expiration of twenty days. Upchurch v. Upchurch, 173 N. C., 88, 91 S. E., 702. His appeal from the order of the clerk should have been dismissed.

There is error in the judgment reversing the order of the clerk, and directing the commissioner to execute a deed to the purchaser at the sale reported by the commissioner on 21 December, 1931. The judgment is

Eeversed.