Case ID: so2d_485/html/0024-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Douglas Earl DAVIS, Appellee.
    No. 85-1049.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 14, 1986.
    
      Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.
    Jack T. Edmund and Marshall Slaughter, Bartow, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

From our review of the record, which includes the tape recording of the polygraph examinations and the transcript of appellee’s confessions which immediately followed, we cannot say that the court erred in suppressing the confessions as the product of an unacceptable level of psychological coercion exerted by the polygraph examiner on the appellee. See Brewer v. State, 386 So.2d 232 (Fla.1980).

Affirmed.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.