Case ID: so2d_546/html/1324-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DOUCET, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James CURTIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Billy TABOR, Defendant and James Odiorne, Appellant.
    No. 88-329.
    Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
    June 28, 1989.
    Thomas & Dunahoe, Gerard Thomas and Robert Thomas, Natchitoches, for plaintiff/appellee.
    Harrington & Harrington, Rodney Harrington, Natchitoches, Hailey, McNamara, Hall, Larmann & Papale, Michael P. Mentz, Metairie, for defendants/appellants.
    Campbell, Campbell & Johnson, Mark 0. Foster, Minden, Henry H. Bernard, Baton Rouge, Cook, Yancey, King & Galloway, Brian Homza, Shreveport, Fish, Montgomery & Robinson and Roy Fish, Minden, for defendants/appellees.
    Before GUIDRY, FORET and DOUCET, JJ.
   DOUCET, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the consolidated case of Charlotte Krueger v. Billy Tabor, et al, 546 So.2d 1317 (La.App.3rd Cir.1989), rendered this day, the judgment appealed is REVERSED IN PART, AMENDED IN PART, AND AS AMENDED, AFFIRMED in accordance with the views expressed in the companion case.

REVERSED IN PART; AMENDED IN PART, AND AS AMENDED, AFFIRMED.