Case ID: f-appx_283/html/0443-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Roberto ZAVALA-RUBALCAVA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 08-71092.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 9, 2008.
    
    Filed June 18, 2008.
    Roberto Zavala-Rubalcava, pro se.
    CAC-Distriet Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, San Francisco, CA, Oil, John S. Hogan, Kiley L. Kane, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Offiee of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before: REINHARDT, BERZON and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing petitioner’s late appeal.

A review of the administrative record demonstrates that petitioner’s notice of appeal to the BIA was not filed within 30 calendar days after the stating of the Immigration Judge’s oral decision. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.38(b); Da Cruz v. INS, 4 F.3d 721 (9th Cir.1993). Accordingly, respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam).

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.