Case ID: so2d_613/html/0604-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rufus MILLER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee.
    No. 91-3157.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Feb. 12, 1993.
    Rufus Miller, pro se.
    Kurt E. Ahrendt, Asst. General Counsel, Florida Parole Com’n, Tallahassee, for ap-pellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus. We do not reach any of the issues presented in appellant’s brief, because they were not specifically raised before and ruled upon by the trial court. State ex rel. Flink v. Canova, 94 So.2d 181, 186 (Fla.1967) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, BOOTH and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.