Case ID: ga_40/html/0492-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

E. A. Hoyt & Co., plaintiff in error, vs. D. J. & J. W. Sheffield, defendants in error.
    Complaint and motion for new trial, from Thomas.
    The writ of error in this case was dismissed by the Court, ex suo mero motu, because counsel for plaintiffs in error failed “ on or before the calling of the cause on the docket for a hearing” to furnish to each of the Judges and to the Reporter a printed or plainly written copy of the bill of exceptions,” as is required by Rule 12th of the Supreme Court. See 38th Georgia Reports, 690.
    'Arthur P. Wright, Lochrane & Clark, for plaintiff in error.
    Hammond & Davis, for defendants in error.