Case ID: f-appx_475/html/0473-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Nathaniel JONES, a/k/a Devon Najee Hinton, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 12-6673.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 16, 2012.
    Decided: Aug. 20, 2012.
    Nathaniel Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia L. Norman, Office of The United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel Jones appeals .the district court’s order denying his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the-record and find no reversible error, given that Jones is ineligible for the reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v. Jones, No. 3:06-cr-00044-REP-l (E.D.Va. Mar. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.