Case ID: njl_112/html/0499-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JAMES HOROWITZ, PROSECUTOR-RESPONDENT, v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF NEW JERSEY AND SIDNEY M. REINHART, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. JAMES HOROWITZ, RELATOR-RESPONDENT, v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
    Submitted February 16, 1934
    Decided April 12, 1934.
    For the appellant Sidney M. Reinhart, Durand, Ivins & Carton.
    
    For the appellant Civil Service Commission, William A. Stevens.
    
    For the respondent James Horowitz, Merritt Lane.
    
   Pee Cueiam.

The judgments in these cases are affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court, with the qualification that the act justifying the rejection of Reinhart was not chapter 298 of the laws of 1920, but chapter 52 of the laws of 1922, page 98, as amended by chapter 349 of the laws of 1929, page 784.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Teenchabd, Paekee, Lloyd, Hehek, Pekskie, Van Buskikk, Kays, Hetfield, Deaf, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.