Case ID: ohio-law-abs_1/html/0340-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 315
    CLEVELAND, C. C., etc., RY. CO v. UNITED STATES
    U. S. Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit
    No. 3709.
    Jan. 11, 1923
    286 Fed. 135
    INTERNAL REVENUE — Interest properly include» in judgment for excise tax.
    Knappen, Denison and Donahue, JJ.
    Error to Judgment of the District Court, S. D. Ohio W. D.
    W. D., John W. Peck, Judge
    Attorneys — Harmon, Colston, Goldsmith & Hoad ley, Cincinnati, for the Railway; Thos. H. Morroijv Dis. Atty., for the U. S. t.
   PER CURIAM:

Epitomized Opinion

The government obtained judgment against th Railway Company in an action to recover excís taxes, and in it interest was included. |

The court of appeals herein held this was prop'e as under the statute act, Aug. 5, 1909, § 38, t!¡i< excise tax itself drew interest. ^