Case ID: ill-app_20/html/0652-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 115—2385.
    Stanwood v. Pratt.
    Judgment was rendered by the court below in favor of appellee and against appellant, for the value of certain shares of telephone stock. There is evidence in the record which clearly supports the finding, and from an examination of the whole evidence, this court is unable to say that it so preponderates against the finding as to justify a reversal.
    Judgment affirmed.
    Opinion filed July 21, 1886.
   Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judge below, Joseph E. Gary. Attorneys, for appellant, Mr. C. C. Bonney and Mr. Lyman M. Paine ; for appellee, Mr. E. F. Runyan.