Case ID: ad3d_154/html/0867-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NYCTL 1998-1 Trust et al., Plaintiffs, v Glizer Rodriguez, Appellant, and BH 2105 Atlantic, LLC, Intervenor-Respondent, et al., Defendants.
    [62 NYS3d 283]
   — Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ingrid Joseph, J.), dated October 9, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the cross motion of the defendant Glizer Rodriguez, in effect, for leave to reargue her opposition to a prior motion of the intervenor, BH 2105 Atlantic, LLC.

Cross motion by BH 2105 Atlantic, LLC, inter alia, to dismiss the appeal on the ground that no appeal lies from an order denying reargument. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated June 21, 2016, that branch of the cross motion which is to dismiss the appeal was held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.

Upon the papers filed in support of the cross motion, the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the submission of the appeal, it is

Ordered that the branch of the cross motion which is to dismiss the appeal is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The appeal must be dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see Rosendale v Harrison & Burrowes Bridge Constructors, Inc., 78 AD3d 680 [2010]).

Mastro, J.P., Leventhal, Maltese and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.