Case ID: pa_630/html/0646-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

108 A.3d 28
    Mary E. GLOVER, Individually and on Behalf of other similarly situated former and current homeowners in Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. UDREN LAW OFFICES, P.C., a New Jersey Debt Collector, Respondent.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Jan. 13, 2015.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioners, is:

(1) Does Act 6, § 502 provide a remedy, as the explicit language of the statute establishes, against any statutorily defined “person” collecting statutorily prohibited fees on behalf of residential mortgage lenders?

The Application to File Supplement to Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DISMISSED as moot.