Case ID: nj_58/html/0159-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FIORE DI COSTANZO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MATTHEWS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Argued January 25, 1971 — Reargued April 5, 1971—
    Decided April 12, 1971.
    
      Mrs. Ruth Rabstein argued the cause for appellant (Pellettieri and Rabstein, attorneys; Mr. Robert A. Gladstone, on the brief).
    
      Mr. Fred R. Daniels argued the cause for respondent (Mr. John W. Taylor, attorney; Mr. Fred R. Daniels, of counsel).
   Per Curiam.

The court being equally divided, the judgment of the Appellate Division whose opinion is reported in 110 N. J. Super. 383 (1970) is affirmed.

For affirmance — Justices Erancis, Hall and Mountain —3.

For reversal — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs and Proctor — 3.