Case ID: cust-ct_8/html/0520-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Keefe, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 47195.
    Protest 44218-K of Rudolf Nathan (Pittsburgh).
   Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the plaintiff limited his claims to certain articles. He testified that one of the articles, binoculars, had been in his possession 6 years prior to his immigrating to this country and that the remaining articles had been in his household for more than a year prior to departure. However, from the evidence presented the court was unable to determine which of the household effects, if any, are entitled to free entry under paragraph 1632. /The binoculars were not shown to be household effects, nor to be exempt from duty under paragraph 1798. On the record presented the protest was overruled in all respects.