Case ID: f-appx_205/html/0585-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jorge Austria PEDRAZA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 04-71963.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 6, 2006.
    
    Filed Nov. 13, 2006.
    Jorge Austria Pedraza, Santa Maria, CA, pro se. for Petitioner.
    CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Siu P. Wong, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before: LEAVY, GOULD, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jorge Austria Pedraza, a native and citizens of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his motion to reopen. We deny the petition for review.

Austria Pedraza contends the legacy Immigration and Naturalization Service violated his due process and equal protection rights by placing him in removal, rather than deportation, proceedings. However, Austria Pedraza has not demonstrated that the BIA abused its discretion in denying his motion to reopen. See Membreno v. Gonzales, 425 F.3d 1227, 1229 (9th Cir.2005); see also Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that being placed in removal proceedings rather than deportation proceedings does not violate the U.S. Constitution).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.