Case ID: ad3d_59/html/0501-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Barbara Martin, Respondent, v City of New York, Defendant, and Moise Zaytoune et al., Appellants.
    [873 NYS2d 191]
   In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Moise Zaytoune and Jacqueline Zaytoune appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bunyan, J.), dated January 30, 2008, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

“An owner of property abutting a public sidewalk is under no duty to pedestrians to remove snow and ice that accumulates on the sidewalk unless a statute or ordinance specifically imposes tort liability for failing to do so, or the property owner made the sidewalk more hazardous through negligent snow removal efforts” (Jablons v Peak Health Club, Inc., 19 AD3d 369, 370 [2005]; Rao v Hatanian, 2 AD3d 616 [2003]). The complaint alleged that the appellants’ negligent snow removal efforts precipitated the plaintiffs fall.

The appellants failed to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law since they did not establish, prima facie, that their snow removal efforts did not cause, create, or exacerbate the icy condition that precipitated the plaintiffs accident and consequent injuries (see Knee v Trump Vil. Constr. Corp., 15 AD3d 545 [2005]). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied the appellants’ motion for summary judgment regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). Fisher, J.P., Florio, Dickerson and Belen, JJ., concur.