Case ID: f-appx_621/html/0208-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Connell D. HAWKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer KINLAW; Officer Strickland; Officer Russell; Officer Bullard; Officer J. Prince, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 15-6976.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 20, 2015.
    Decided: Oct. 23, 2015.
    Connell D. Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Connell D. Hawkins appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hawkins’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hawkins v. Kinlaw, No. 5:14-ct-03241-F (E.D.N.C. June 12, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.