Case ID: nys_35/html/1104-12.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CLARK, Appellant, v. CITY OF BINGHAMTON et al., Respondents.
    (Supreme Court, General Term, Fourth Department.
    February Term, 1895.)
    Action by Edward K. Clark against the city of Binghamton and the board of street commissioners of the city of Binghamton.
   No opinion. Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Held, that the plaintiff’s qualified assent to the paper signed by the other property owners on Front street did not operate as a dedication of the plaintiff’s property that was within the lines of the proposed addition to such street.