Case ID: f-appx_613/html/0255-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Armando Jimenez TAGLE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-6470.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 18, 2015.
    Decided: Sept. 1, 2015.
    
      Armando Jimenez Tagle, Appellant Pro Se. Steven R. Kaufman, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Armando Jimenez Tagle appeals the district court’s order denying without prejudice his motion to dismiss his criminal indictment, conviction, and sentence for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Tagle, No. 3:12-cr-00295-MOC-DCK-1 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.