Case ID: so2d_568/html/0962-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David WEISFELD and Pauline Weisfeld, Appellants, v. William S. CASSEL, Weisman, Douglas & Cassel, P.A. and Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick, Schneider & Mager, P.A., Appellees.
    Nos. 89-1011, 89-1590.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 2, 1990.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 28, 1991.
    Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Edward A. Perse, Hoppe, Backmeyer & Nelson, Miami, for appellants.
    Stephens, Lynn, Klein & McNicholas, Robert M. Klein and Philip D. Parrish, Miami, for Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick, Schneider & Mager, P.A.
    Cathy Jackson Lerman, Fort Lauderdale, for Weisman, Douglas & Cassel, P.A.
    Before BARKDULL, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1979).