Case ID: nj-eq_81/html/0222-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sarah L. Remer, complainant-respondent, v. Frances J. Benedict et al., defendants-respondents, and James C. Bioren, defendant-appellant.
    [Submitted January 3d, 1912.
    Decided March 5th, 1913.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by ■Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported ante p. 21.
    
    
      Messrs. Coult & Smith and Mr.. Arthur B. Denman, solicitors for and of counsel with James C. Bioren, appellant.
    
      Mr. Charles C. Pilgrim, solicitor for and of counsel with Sarah-L. Remer, respondent.
    
      Messrs. Lum, Tambyln & Colyer, solicitors for and of counsel with Frances J. Benedict and others, respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Emery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice,- Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalis oh, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, Treacy — 12.

For reversal — None.