Case ID: f-appx_646/html/0324-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerome SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-7778.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 21, 2016.
    Decided: April 25, 2016.
    Jerome Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Eugene Anthony, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Smith appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for a reduction in his sentence based on a retroactive amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines and imposing a proportionate reduction. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). ^Because Smith’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Smith has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.