Case ID: f-appx_529/html/0341-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jerome ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A.K. PRUITT, Captain; Susan Horan, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 13-6570.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 13, 2013.
    Decided: June 18, 2013.
    Jerome Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert T. Numbers, II, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Anderson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny reconsideration of the court’s earlier order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Pruitt, No. 1:10-cv-00553-NCT-JEP (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.