Case ID: f-appx_172/html/0489-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Virgie B. HUBBARD; Dennis G. Hubbard; Dennis G. Hubbard, Jr., Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. ELLIOTT, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 05-2158.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 23, 2006.
    Decided: Feb. 28, 2006.
    Virgie B. Hubbard, Dennis G. Hubbard, and Dennis G. Hubbard, Jr., Appellants Pro Se. John Headley Shott, Sr., Shott, Gurganus & Williamson, Bluefield, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM:

Virgie B. Hubbard, Dennis G. Hubbard, and Dennis G. Hubbard, Jr., appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge dismissing their civil action for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hubbard v. Elliott, Inc., No. CA-04-589 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.