Case ID: f-appx_322/html/0635-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario ONTIVEROS-RUIZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-6006.
    United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
    April 24, 2009.
    Sanford C. Coats, Brandon T. Hale, United States Attorney’s Office, Oklahoma City, OK, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Daniel L. White, Oklahoma City, OK, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before HARTZ, O’BRIEN, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER AND JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the court on the government’s motion to enforce the appeal waiver contained in defendant’s plea agreement. The motion is filed pursuant to United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir.2004) (en banc) (per curiam). In response, defendant concedes that there are no non-frivolous reasons to dispute the government’s motion.

Accordingly, the government’s motion is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 
      
       This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.