Case ID: f-appx_84/html/0425-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nelda CHESSEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 03-30540.
    Summary Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Dec. 30, 2003.
    Frank A. Granger, Lake Charles, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Angeline Sue Johnson, Social Security Administration, Office of General Counsel, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Nelda Chesseman appeals the district court’s decision affirming the determination by the Commissioner of Social Security that she is not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act. Chesseman argues that the administrative law judge’s determination that she was not disabled is based on errors of law and is not supported by the evidence.

Having reviewed the record and briefs on appeal, we conclude that the administrative law judge applied the correct legal standard in determining whether Chesseman was disabled, and the administrative law judge’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. See Ripley v. Chater, 67 F.3d 552, 555 (5th Cir.1995).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.