Case ID: ga_113/html/1071-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Lumpkin, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Beysiegel et al. v. Rome Mutual Loan Association.
    Argued June 24,
    Decided July 23, 1901.
    Injunction. Before Judge Henry. Floyd superior court. March 30, 1901.
    
      G. A. JET. Harris & Son and JR. L. Ghamlee, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Halsted Smith, contra.
   Lumpkin, P. J.

1. An injunction should not be granted when the plaintiff in the petition therefor has a complete and adequate remedy at law.

2. The defendant in error in the present case had such a remedy by claim, the successful prosecution of which would, for all essential purposes, have been as effectual as the equitable proceeding; nor was this proceeding maintainable on the theory that it was necessary to prevent a multiplicity of suits.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.