Case ID: so2d_740/html/0576-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Matteo RUSSONIELLO, Appellant, v. HAMILTON BANK, N.A., Appellee.
    No. 99-791.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 21, 1999.
    Rehearing Denied Sept. 29, 1999.
    Homer, Bonner & Delgado, and Luis E. Delgado, and Lawrence B. Lambert, Miami, for appellant.
    Tew & Nowak, and Jeffrey Tew, Miami, for appellee.
    Before GERSTEN, FLETCHER, and SHEVIN, JJ.
    
    
      
       Judge Shevin did not participate in oral argu-menl.
    
   PER CURIAM.

Based upon the doctrine of forum non conveniens, we reverse the trial court’s order with directions to dismiss the fraudulent inducement claim. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.061; Kinney Sys., Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co., 674 So.2d 86 (Fla.1996); Cibar-Geigy Ltd. v. Fish Peddler, Inc., 691 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 699 So.2d 1372 (Fla.1997).

Reversed and remanded with directions.