Case ID: f-appx_694/html/0741-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael SASSNETT, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 17-10037 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    (July 19, 2017)
    Patricia Green Rhodes, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Augusta, GA, Edward J. Tarver, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Savannah, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Michael Sassnett, Residential Reentry Office, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant
    Before HULL, WILSON and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Brendan Fleming, appointed counsel for Michael Sassnett in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sassnett’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.