Case ID: ny_304/html/0862-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anthony Palazzolo, Respondent, v. Park 75th Corporation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
    Argued October 21, 1952;
    decided December 4, 1952.
    
      
      William F. McNulty for appellants.
    
      Bernard Meyerson, Morris L. Meshel and Gustave G. Rosenberg for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lottghban, Ch. J., Desmond, Dye, Ftjld and Fboessel, JJ. Lewis and Conway, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal and a new trial upon the ground that there was erroneously received in evidence expert testimony that the window sash involved herein was not so constructed that it could be cleaned from the inside within the intendment of the rules and regulations of the Board of Standards and Appeals and of Section 202 of the Labor Law.” (Dougherty v. Milliken, 163 N. Y. 527, 533-534.)