Case ID: sw2d_803/html/0654-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert WHEADON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. 58590.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Jan. 29, 1991.
    Melinda K. Pendergraph, St. Louis, for movant/appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Millie Aulbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent/respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals after the trial court dismissed his Rule 29.15 motion. His motion was not timely filed. Movant concedes that the Missouri Supreme Court has ruled adversely to his position on this issue in other cases. See Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692 (Mo. banc 1989), cert. denied sub nom. Walker v. Missouri, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 186, 107 L.Ed.2d 141 (1989). An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).