Case ID: a3d_173-2/html/0389-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Connecticut v. Mitchell HENDERSON
    Supreme Court of Connecticut.
    Decided June 28, 2017
    Judie Marshall and Walter Bansley IV, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.
    James M. Ralls, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
    The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 173 Conn. App. 119, 163 A.3d 74 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issue:
    "Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant's sentence was not illegal, does not violate the double jeopardy clause, and does not run contrary to legislative intent?"
    ESPINOSA, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.