Case ID: f-appx_470/html/0139-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Denise L. SEVERINO-TODD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. WAL-MART, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 12-1095.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 29, 2012.
    Decided: April 3, 2012.
    Denise L. Severino-Todd, Appellant Pro Se. Julie Kerr Adams, Angela Byrd Cummings, Littler Mendelson PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Denise L. Severino-Todd appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant's motion to dismiss her employment discrimination action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp. 2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Severino-Todd v. Wal-Mart, Inc., No. 5:ll-cv-336-BR, 2011 WL 6370483 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.