Case ID: sw2d_752/html/0466-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Raymond L. CRAWFORD, d/b/a Raymond L. Crawford, Construction Company, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HEMPHILL CONTRACTING COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 53787.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    June 14, 1988.
    James Edward Terry, St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.
    Eugene Edward Coon, Jr., Clayton, for plaintiff-respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from trial court jury’s verdict and judgment for plaintiff on its suit for contractual payments. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).