Case ID: a3d_77/html/0618-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Tyde PASTURE, Respondent.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Sept. 27, 2013.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Following remand of this matter for reconsideration by the Superior Court in light of Commonwealth v. Perry, 612 Pa. 557, 32 A.3d 232 (2011), did the Superior Court, in purporting to distinguish Perry, disregard, for a second time, this Court’s directives in Perry and Commonwealth v. Walls, 592 Pa. 557, 926 A.2d 957 (2007)?