Case ID: so2d_267/html/0207-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BARHAM, J., TATE, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

263 La. 95
    STATE of Louisiana ex rel. William RILEY v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.
    No. 52842.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Oct. 17, 1972.
   In re: William Riley applying for writ of habeas corpus and/or mandamus

Writs denied. In view of the written reasons by the trial judge the showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted. See Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed. 2d 274.

TATE, J.,

dissents.

In the absence of a contemporaneous recording, the conclusion-ary statement in the minutes at the time of the plea of guilty that the Boykin interroT gation was conducted does not justify the denial of an evidentiary hearing on the petitioner’s allegations that no such interrogation took place and that the minutes’ general allegations are not correct.

DIXON, J., dissents from refusal.