Case ID: ala-app_19/html/0518-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "FOSTER, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(98 South. 489)
    (6 Div. 342.)
    COLLINS v. STATE.
    ■ (Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    Dec. 18, 1923.)
    1. Jury ¡&wkey;>25(6) — Demand for jury in circuit court held too late.
    
    Where judgment of conviction of misdemeanor was rendered in .county court on January 30th, and defendant was allowed 5 days in which to appeal to the circuit court under ,Loc. Acts 1919, p. 121, § 30, and on February 3d defendant gave notice of appeal, and on February 7th a certified transcript of the proceedings in the county court was filed with the clerk of the circuit court, the appeal was talc-, en on February 3d, and a demand for a jury made on March 8th, more than 30 days thereafter,, came too late, under Gen. Acts 19Í5, p. 939, § 2..
    2. Criminal law <&wkey;260(!3) — Record must show waiver of complaint or "information on appeal to circuit court.
    Where record does not show complaint or information signed by solicitor as required by Code 1907, § 6730, on appeal to circuit court from county court, or waiver thereof by the defendant, conviction, resting on trial in circuit court on the original affidavit made in the county court, must be reversed.
    «gssFor other cases see same topic and KE*-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
    Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; Walter B. Jones, Judge.
    Lewis E. Collins was convicted of obtaining money under false pretense, and dppeals.
    Reversed and remanded.
    M. B. Grace, of Birmingham, for appellant.
    Appellant was deprived of his constitutional right to a jury trial, and the judgmént should be reversed. Const. 1901, § 11; Lewis v. State, 123 Ala. 86, 26 South. 516; Curlee v. State, 16 Ala.' App. 62, 75 South. 268.
    Jim Davis, Sol., of Birmingham, for the State.
    The demand for trial by jury, not having been made within the time required by law, was properly denied. Acts 1915, p. 939; Loc. Acts 1919, p. 129; Kreutner v. State, 16 Ala. App. 553, 80 South. 127; Benjamin v. City of Montgomery, 16 Ala. App. 653, 81 South. 145; McGaig v. State, 16 Ala. App. 581, 80 South. 155; Ex parte MeCaig, 203 Ala. 699, 83 South. 927.
   FOSTER, J.

The'prosecution was commenced in the Jefferson county court of misdemeanors. . Judgment of conviction was rendered in the county court on January 30, 1923. The defendant was allowed 5 days in which to appeal to the circuit court. Local Acts 1919, p. 121, § 30. On February 3d the defendant gave notice of appeal. On February 7th a certified transcript of the proceedings in the county 'court was filed with the clerk of the circuit court. The appeal was taken on'February 3d. The demand for a jury was made on March 8th, more than 30 days thereafter, and came too late. Acts 1915, p. 939, § 2. -

The cause was tried in the circuit court on the original affidavit m'ade in the county court. No complaint or information was filed by the solicitor, as required by section 6730, Code 1907. There is nothing in the record to show a waiver by the defendant of the filing of such complaint or information.

In the absence of this statement required by statute, or a waiver appearing in the record, it was error to put the defendant to trial on the original affidavit. Moss v. State, 42 Ala. 546; Haynes v. State, 5 Ala. App. 167, 59 South. 325; Kirkhan v. State, 18 Ala. App. 426, 93 South. 56; Peeples v. State, 17 Ala. App. 430, 84 South. 859; Perry v. State, 17 Ala. App. 80, 81 South. 85S; Howard v. State, 17 Ala. App. 9, 81 South. 345.

For the errors above indicated, the judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

“Reversed and remanded.