Case ID: or-app_176/html/0252-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Submitted on record and briefs July 23,
    affirmed August 22, 2001
    REYNALDO RIOS, Petitioner, v. PSYCHIATRIC SECURITY REVIEW BOARD, Respondent.
    
    84-672; A104844
    30 P3d 1227
    Harris S. Matarazzo filed the brief for petitioner.
    Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Katherine H. Waldo, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
    Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Wollheim, Judge.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB), upon remand to the Board from the Supreme Court, Rios v. PSRB, 325 Or 151, 934 P2d 399 (1997), that continued petitioner’s commitment at a state hospital. See ORS 161.341. We write only to address petitioner’s contention that an Axis I diagnosis of pedophilia or of alcohol abuse cannot constitute a “mental disease or defect” for purposes of ORS 161.341(4), in that those conditions are excluded by ORS 161.295(2) We reject that argument for the reasons stated in the en banc lead opinion in Hanson v. PSRB, 156 Or App 198,965 P2d 1051 (1998), rev’d and rent’d on other grounds 331 Or 626, 19 P3d 350 (2001).

Affirmed. 
      
       ORS 161.295(2) provides that:
      “[T]he terms ‘mental disease or defect’ do not include an abnormality manifested only by repeated criminal or otherwise antisocial conduct, nor do they include any abnormality constituting solely a personality disorder.”