Case ID: ala-app_26/html/0693-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SAMFORD, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

153 So. 924
    Clarence SWAFFORD v. STATE.
    8 Div. 840.
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    March 6, 1934.
    Douglass Taylor, of Huntsville, and Milo Moody, of Scottsboro, for appellant.
    Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.
   SAMFORD, Judge.

The trial was in all things regular, and the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict.

Motion for a new trial was made and overruled. The evidence offered on the motion for a new trial was not sufficient to warrant the trial court in setting aside the verdict. The action of the court in overruling the motion was free from error.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.