Case ID: okla-crim_6/html/0716-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ED. ELMS v. STATE.
    No. A-1170.
    Opinion Filed January 16, 1912.
    Appeal from Caddo County Court; C. Ross Hume, Judge.
    Ed. Elms was convicted of violating the prohibitory law,, and appeals.
    Appeal dismissed.
    Bristow & McFadyen, for plaintiff in error.
    Smith C. Matson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State..
   PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Caddo county at the January, 1911, term, on a charge of having the possession of intoxicating liquor with the unlawful intent to sell the same, and his punishment fixed at a fine of two hundred fifty dollars and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of ninety days. Following the rule laid down in the Stumpf case, the Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion is well taken and is sustained. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.