Case ID: f-appx_222/html/0097-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kristin KEEFFE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Toni F. NATALIE, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 06-0652-cv.
    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    April 11, 2007.
    Peter J.W. Sherwin, Proskauer Rose LLP (Douglas C. Rennie, Jonathan Galler, of counsel), New York, New York, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Christian H. Dribusch, Albany, New York, for Defendant-Appellee.
    PRESENT: HomAMALYAL. KEARSE, Hon. SONIA SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judges, Hon. MIRIAM GOLDMAN CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
    
    
      
       The Honorable Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.
    
   SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-appellant Kristin Keeffe appeals from a decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Keeffe v. Natalie, 337 B.R. 11 (N.D.N.Y.2006) (“Keeffe I”), affirming an unreported decision of the Bankruptcy Court (Littlefield, B.J.), granting defendant-appellee Toni Natalie summary judgment and dismissing Keeffe’s claims. We presume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural background of the case and with the issues on appeal.

Revocation of a bankruptcy discharge is an extraordinary remedy, and the party seeking it “has the burden of proving the facts upon which revocation is conditioned by the statute.” In re Popovich, 105 F.2d 154, 155 (2d Cir.1939). Keeffe’s submission of tax warrants purporting to show that Blue Crystal was generating a profit post-petition, without explanation or interpretative guidance provided to the court, was insufficient to carry this burden.

For this foregoing reason, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.