Case ID: ind_15/html/0187-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Fillson v. Scott.
    
      Wednesday, December 5.
    APPEAL from the Huntington Common Pleas'.
    
      L. M. Ninde and H. N, Puckett, for appellant.
   Per Curiam.

Proceedings supplementary to execution, under § 519, 2 R. S. 1852, p. 152. The complaint was not sworn to, as it should have been; nor was it sufficiently certain in describing what articles, and where, the defendant had, subject to execution ; but these defects were waived by answer to the merits.

The Court found against the defendant, to the amount of $135, over the $300 exempt from execution.

We have not been able to find proof of the existence of the money in the defendant’s hands.

The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded, &e.