Case ID: se2d_826/html/0699-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The ESTATE OF Anthony Lawrence SAVINO v. The CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, a North Carolina Hospital Authority, d/b/a Carolinas Healthcare System and CMC-Northeast
    No. 18PA19
    Supreme Court of North Carolina.
    May 9, 2019
    Robert R. Marcus, Attorney at Law, Kimberly Sullivan, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Matthew Nis Leerberg, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Brian M. Rowlson, Attorney at Law, Jonathan E. Schulz, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority d/b/a Carolinas Healthcare System and CMCNortheast.
    R. Kent Brown, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, Robert E. Zaytoun, Attorney at Law, Matthew D. Ballew, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Savino, Anthony Lawrence (The Estate of).
    Jon Ryan Moore, Attorney at Law, Charlotte.
    Paige L. Pahlke, Attorney at Law, Charlotte.
    John R. Taylor, Attorney at Law, Raleigh.
    Matthew W. Krueger-Andes, Attorney at Law, Charlotte.
    Burton Craige, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Trisha S. Pande, W. Ellis Boyle, Attorney at Law, for N.C. Advocates for Justice.
    ORDER
   Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th of January 2019 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 7th of February 2019 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of May 2019."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

Davis, J. recused