Case ID: so2d_842/html/0741-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. SHAW, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Timothy Craig ANDERSON v. STATE of Alabama.
    CR-00-0957.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
    Oct. 26, 2001.
    Rehearing Denied Dec. 7, 2001.
    Timothy C. Anderson, pro se.
    William H. Pryor, Jr., atty. gen., and Daniel W. Madison, deputy atty. gen., for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

McMILLAN, P.J., and BASCHAB and WISE, JJ., concur. SHAW, J., concurs in part and dissents in part, with opinion, which COBB, J., joins.

SHAW, Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur to affirm Timothy Craig Anderson’s conviction and sentence for reckless endangerment. However, I believe that the trial court erred when it permitted the State to amend the indictment for trafficking in cocaine to include an enhancement under § 13A-12-231(13), Aal.Code 1975, because I believe the amendment resulted in Anderson’s being charged with a greater offense. See Rule 13.5(a), Ala.R.Crim.P. Therefore, I would reverse Anderson’s conviction and sentence for trafficking in cocaine. See my special writing in Poole v. State, [Ms. CR-99-1200, August 31, 2001] — So.2d -, - (Ala.Crim.App.2001) (Shaw, J., concurring in the result).