Case ID: nj_123/html/0457-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

— A.2d -
    STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DAVID MAURE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RAYMOND HOBBS AND DANIEL HOBART, DEFENDANTS, AND HAROLD PETTY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued February 13, 1991
    Decided April 11, 1991.
    
      Riaz A. Mian argued the cause for appellant David Maure (Voorhees, Bennett & Wherry, attorneys; Riaz A. Mian and E. John Wherry, Jr., on the brief).
    
      Carl L. Taraschi argued the cause for appellant Harold Petty.
    
      Stephen H. Monson, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Baime’s opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 240 N.J.Super. 269, 573 A.2d 186 (1990).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

Opposed — None.