Case ID: f-appx_294/html/0012-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rickie Joseph ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pharmacist Julie FINCH; Lt. Mack; Sgt. K. Hallman; Dr. Connie Vice; Dr. Herbert Myles; Dr. Michael Wein-stein; Daniel Johnson; Judge J.B. Allen; H.G. Alexander, Defendants-Ap-pellees.
    No. 08-6692.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 16, 2008.
    Decided: Sept. 22, 2008.
    
      Rickie Joseph Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Rickie Joseph Anderson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Finch, No. 5:08-ct-03002-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.