Case ID: so2d_755/html/0765-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DYNABILT TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL CORP., Appellant, v. WARREN HENRY AUTOMOBILES, INC., Appellee.
    No. 3D99-1786.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 5, 2000.
    Greenfield & Duval and Michael D. Hy-man, Pembroke Pines, for appellant.
    Wallace, Bauman, Legón, Fodiman & Shannon, Todd A. Fodiman and Michael G. Shannon, Miami, for appellee.
    Before JORGENSON, GODERICH, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s assessment of attorney’s fees against Dynabilt Technology International Corporation, but reverse as to the amount of fees awarded because the final judgment does not make an express finding as to the number of hours reasonably expended on the litigation and the reasonable hourly rate. We remand for the sole purpose of making these findings. Rodriguez v. Campbell, 720 So.2d 266 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), review denied, 731 So.2d 650 (Fla.1999); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Gil, 573 So.2d 90 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

.The remaining points that the appellant has raised on appeal lack merit.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.