Case ID: sw3d_511/html/0469-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jeffrey S. SAUERBRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    WD 79367
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    ORDER FILED: February 28, 2017
    Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant,
    Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.
    Before Division Three: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, and Victor C. Howard and Gary D. Witt, Judges
   Order

Per Curiam:

Jeffrey Sauerbry appeals the motion court’s denial, following a hearing, of his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15. Sauerbry argues that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion in that he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel failed to object to certain testimony at trial. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).