Case ID: so2d_492/html/0471-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Sherman DOUGLAS, Appellee.
    No. 85-2121.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Aug. 12, 1986.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Susan Odzer Hugentugler, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Joel DeFabio, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the trial court correctly granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.190(c)(4) on the ground that the undisputed facts demonstrated that he had complied with the requirements of section 316.062(2), Florida Statutes (1983), and was therefore not in violation, as charged, of section 316.027(1), Florida Statutes (1983).

Affirmed.