Case ID: so2d_596/html/0533-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re ESTATE OF Frederick MYERSON, Deceased.
    No. 91-1920.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    April 22, 1992.
    James R. George and Samuel S. Smith of Ruden, Barnett, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A., Miami, for appellants-Joseph Garb and Sylvia Schultz.
    Russ Bohn, Rose Lee Ferstenberg and Stephen C. Beiner, Boca Raton, and Edna L. Caruso of Edna L. Caruso, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee-Ann Marie Abend.
   PER CURIAM.

We find no abuse of discretion by the trial court in extending the time in which appellee was permitted to file a probate claim. See Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. Pope, 485 U.S. 478, 108 S.Ct. 1340, 99 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988); In re Estate of Vickery, 564 So.2d 555 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). However, we agree that the court erred in enjoining the disposition of any estate assets, without conducting a hearing on the request for a temporary injunction and requiring the appellee to prove up her entitlement to injunctive relief.

Accordingly, we affirm the grant of extension and reverse the order of injunction, but without prejudice to the appellee to seek such relief in appropriate proceedings below.

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and GARRETT, JJ., concur.