Case ID: ga-app_43/html/0267-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bell, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

20909.
    Smith v. Becker Roofing Company.
    Decided April 20, 1931.
    
      8. H. Dyer, for plaintiff,in error. Hall & Jones, contra.
   Bell, J.

In this suit for the purchase-price of certain roofing, in which the defendant pleaded total failure of consideration, the evidence authorized a finding that the consideration had only partially failed, and the verdict for the plaintiff, in a materially reduced amount, was supported by the evidence. No error of law being complained of, the court did not err in refusing the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

JenMns, P. J., cund Stephens, J., concur.