Case ID: ohio-st_115/html/0729-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Smith, a Taxpayer, v. City of Fremont et al.
    
      Supreme court — Dismissals—No debatable constitutional question involved — Municipal ordinance for water purification plant passed as emergency measure.
    
    (No. 20119
    Decided November 4, 1926.)
    Error to the Court of. Appeals of Sandusky county.
    
      Miss Hasel Fry, Mr. David B. Love, and Mr. Hal C. DeRan, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Mr. Harry Gam, and Mr. I. G. Stout, for defendants in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause, on the authority of Shryock, a Taxpayer, v. City of Zanesville, 92 Ohio St., 375, 110 N. E., 937, and Vansuch, Dir. of Public Safety & Service, v. State, ex rel. Fetch, 112 Ohio St., 688, 148 N. E., 232.

Petition in error dismissed.

Jones, Matthias, Day, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.