Case ID: f-appx_139/html/0586-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Willie Karl BEAN, Petitioner—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; United States Parole Commission; Court Service and Offender Supervision Agency; Federal Bureau of Prisons, Respondents—Appellees.
    No. 05-6557.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 14, 2005.
    Decided: July 27, 2005.
    Willie Karl Bean, Appellant pro se.
    Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Willie Karl Bean appeals the district court order dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bean v. United, States Dep’t of Justice, No. CA-05-253-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 25, 2005). We deny Bean’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED 
      
       Jurisdiction was proper in the District Court for the District of Columbia where this case was originally filed. However, because the district court's disposition of the case is correct regardless of which district court were to review this case, there is no need to transfer the case back to the District Court for the District of Columbia. See 28 U.S.C. § 1631 (2000).