Case ID: njl_91/html/0686-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cubiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ALFRED H. ELLIS, ADMINISTRATOR, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Argued November 22, 1917
    Decided November 22, 1917.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 90 N. J. L. 349.
    For the respondent, Warren Dixon.
    
    For the appellant, Vredenburgh, Wall & Carey.
    
   Pee Cubiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Garrison in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chile Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Heppenheimer, Williams, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.