Case ID: so2d_637/html/0386-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Grayling L. VEREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 94-691.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    June 10, 1994.
    Grayling L. Vereen, Orlando, in pro. per.
    No appearance for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to resubmit the Rule 3.850 motion with the proper oath. See Van Tassell v. State, 601 So.2d 318 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur. 
      
      . We note that the order denying the 3.850 motion is also insufficient. A copy of that portion of the files and records that conclusively shows that Vereen is entitled to no relief is not attached to the order as required by Rule 3.850(d).