Case ID: so3d_127/html/0824-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stephen A. HALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 2D13-1921.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Nov. 27, 2013.
    Stephen A. Hall, pro se.
   PER CURIAM.

The postconviction court’s partial denial of Stephen A. Hall’s motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) is affirmed without prejudice for Hall to file a motion under rule 3.801. If Hall chooses to filé a rule 3.801 motion, it must comply with the requirements outlined in rules 3.801(b), (c), (e), and 3.850(n). Upon receipt of a rule 3.801 motion, the court must follow the procedure outlined in rule 3.850(f). See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.801(e) (effective July 1, 2013). Because it appears that Hall’s time to file a rule 3.801 motion will have expired during the pen-dency of this appeal, if he files such a motion within thirty days of the date this opinion becomes final, it shall not be considered untimely.

Affirmed without prejudice.

SILBERMAN, CRENSHAW, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.