Case ID: so2d_680/html/1089-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Shirley PETRANDIS, Appellant, v. THREE CROWNS & A. STERN, INC., an Ohio Corporation, Larry Eppstein and Sunbelt Heritage, Inc., d/b/a Heritage Greetings, Appellees.
    No. 96-317.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 9, 1996.
    Stewart G. Greenberg; Grossman and Roth and Claudia B. Greenberg, Miami, for appellant.
    Clarke, Silverglate, Williams & Montgomery and Erie L. Lundt, Miami, for appellees.
    Before NESBITT, COPE and SHEVIN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Cantor v. Cochran, 184 So.2d 173 (Fla.1966); Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Kendall, 88 So.2d 276 (Fla. 1956), explained, Keith v. News & Sun Sentinel Co., 667 So.2d 167 (Fla.1995). See also T & T Communications, Inc. v. State of Florida, Dep’t of Labor & Employment Sec., 460 So.2d 996 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); United States Tel. Co. v. State of Florida, Dep’t of Labor & Employment Sec., 410 So.2d .1002 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). See generally Kane Furniture Corp. v. Miranda, 506 So.2d 1061, 1064 (Fla. 2d DCA) (“If a person is subject to the control or direction of another as to his results only, he is an independent contractor; if he is subject to control as to the means used to achieve the results, he is an employee.”), review denied, 515 So.2d 230 (Fla.1987).