Case ID: sw3d_332/html/0923-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Arlando M. NAYLOR, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 95505.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    March 1, 2011.
    Brocea Smith, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Timothy A. Blackwell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Arlando M. Naylor (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.085 without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).