Case ID: so2d_837/html/1123-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sharon POHL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D01-4823.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Feb. 19, 2003.
    
      Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Donna M. Hoffmann, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions of tampering with a witness, contrary to section 914.22(1), Florida Statute (2000), and retaliation against a witness, in violation of section 914.23, Florida Statutes (2000). We reverse appellant’s conviction of harassing a witness under section 914.22(2), Florida Statutes (2000), because there was no evidence that appellant’s contact with the police informant hindered, delayed, prevented, or dissuaded the informant from engaging in any of the conduct specified in section 914.22(2)(a)-(d).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

STONE, GROSS and MAY, JJ„ concur.