Case ID: sw3d_97/html/0533-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Travis HAUGHTON, Appellant.
    No. ED 80731.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Feb. 11, 2003.
    Raymond Capelovitch, Assistant State Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Charnette Douglass, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Travis Haughton appeals his convictions on one count of robbery, one count of attempted robbery, one count of assault, one count of felonious restraint, two counts of burglary and four counts of armed criminal action. He claims that the trial court’s failure to grant him a new trial based on the State’s alleged discovery violation was plain error.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no plain error. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have, however, been provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision in accordance with our local Rule 405. The judgment is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).