Case ID: so2d_616/html/0009-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "OVERTON, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Wilfred BEAUBRUM, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 79669.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Jan. 21, 1993.
    Wilfred Beaubrum, in pro. per.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Patricia Ann Ash, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for respondent.
   OVERTON, Justice.

We have for review Beaubrum v. State, 595 So.2d 254 (Fla. 3d DCA1992), in which the district court addressed the same question we recently answered in State v. Johnson, 616 So.2d 1 (Fla.1993). In accordance with our decision in Johnson, we quash, in part, the decision of the district court in the instant case. Nevertheless, we approve Beaubrum’s sentence. The record in this case reflects that none of the amendments to section 775.084, Florida Statutes, contained in chapter 89-280 affected Beaub-rum’s sentence. Consequently, we approve the result of the district court’s decision because Beaubrum’s sentence is not altered by our decision in Johnson.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. 
      
      . We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.