Case ID: sw3d_559/html/0114-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Donald R. NAPPIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 105816
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    Filed: October 16, 2018
    Damien De Loyola, Amanda R. Langenheim, Co-Counsel, 920 Main Street, Suite 500, Kansas City, MO. 65203, for appellant.
    Julia E. Neidhardt, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.
    Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Donald R. Nappier appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 (2014) motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b) (2018).