Case ID: so2d_486/html/0028-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary Ellen Wickham Gibson HUBBARD, Appellant, v. Stanley Eugene HUBBARD, Appellee.
    No. 85-2300.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 1, 1986.
    Kaplan, Sicking & Bloom and Kathleen M. Phillips, Joel V. Lumer, Miami, for appellant.
    Holland & Knight and Richard Nichols and Sidney Barrows, Miami, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and BASKIN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Finding that the parties’ settlement agreement, incorporated within the Final Judgment [of] Dissolution of Marriage, provided for reduction of alimony on the occurrence of the former wife’s “remarriage,” (a term specifically defined to include the wife’s cohabitation), we affirm the post-judgment order pertaining to ar-rearages. See Mendel v. Mendel, 257 So.2d 293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); Gale v. Rose, 455 So.2d 476 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Adams v. Adams, 423 So.2d 596, 598 n. 6 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); see also Pusey v. Pusey, 386 So.2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Schwebke v. Schwebke, 347 So.2d 645 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Appellant’s remaining point lacks merit.

Affirmed.