Case ID: f3d_704/html/1043-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Angelo DAHLIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Omar RODRIGUEZ, individually and as a Lieutenant of the Burbank Police Department; Edgar Penaranda, individually and as a Sergeant of the Burbank Police Department; Jose Duran, individually and as a Sergeant of the Burbank Police Department; Chris Canales, individually and as a Detective of the Burbank Police Department; City of Burbank, a municipal corporation; John Murphy, individually and as a Lieutenant of the Burbank Police Department, Defendants-Appellees, and Tim Stehr, individually, Defendant.
    No. 10-55978.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Dec. 11, 2012.
    Michael Andrew McGill, Esquire, Michael Alan Morguess, Lackie Dammeier & McGill APC, Upland, CA, Scott Matthew Michelman, Scott Lawrence Nelson, Public Citizen Litigation Group, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Angelo Dahlia, Burbank, CA, pro se.
    Michael Simidjian, Kenneth C. Yuwiler, Silver Hadden Silver Wexler 4- Levine, Santa Monica, CA, for Defendant-Appel-lee, Omar Rodriguez.
    Michael Logan Rains, Esquire, Harry S. Stern, Esquire, Lara Cullinane-Smith, Rains Lucia Stern, PC, Pleasant Hill, CA, for DefendanL-Appellee, Edgar Peñaran-da.
    Patricia Kinaga, Arthur B. Walsh, Kina-ga Law Firm, Los Angeles, CA, Gregory Glenn Petersen, Gregory G. Petersen, A Law Corporation, Newport Coast, CA, for Defendants-Appellees, Jose Duran and Chris Canales.
    Richard Terzian, Esquire, Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendanb-Appellee, City of Burbank.
    Eugene Philip Ramirez, Esquire, Steven Jeff Renick, Manning & Kass Ellrod Ramirez, Trester LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for DefendanL-Appellee, John Murphy.
    Carol Ann Humiston, Esquire, Senior Litigating, Office of the City Attorney, Burbank, CA, for Defendants-Appellees, City of Burbank and Tim Stehr.
    D.C. No. 2:09-CV-08453-MMM-JEM.
   ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.