Case ID: iowa_78/html/0753-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Beck, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rice v. Schlapp.
    Liquor Huisance: injunction: answer not responsive as to time. ( Tibbetts v. Burster, 76 Iowa, 176, followed.)
    
    
      Appeal from Lee District Court. — Hon. J. M. Casey, Judge.
    Filed, February 5, 1889.
    Action to restrain and abate a nuisance maintained by keeping a place for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors. A demurrer to the answer was overruled, and plaintiff refusing to further plead, but standing on his pleadings, his petition was dismissed. He now appeals.
    
      Newman & Blake, for appellant.
    No appearance for appellee.
   Beck, J.

The identical questions ruled in Tibbetts v. Burster by this court arise upon similar facts in this case. • Following that decision, 76 Iowa, 176, we direct that the judgment in this case be

Reversed.