Case ID: so2d_616/html/1229-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Taylane HUDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-01515.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 30, 1993.
    
      James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Cecilia A. Traína, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dell H. Edwards, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s judgments and sentences. We strike special conditions 6, 10, 11 and 13 from the written order of community control and special condition 6 from the written order of probation because these conditions were neither pronounced at sentencing nor statutorily authorized. Vinyard v. State, 586 So.2d 1301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

HALL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.