Case ID: so3d_266/html/0268-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James LUNDGREN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D18-3303
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Opinion filed March 15, 2019
    James Lundgren, Zephyrhills, pro se.
    No Appearance for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the dismissal of Appellant's petition for writ of mandamus seeking records pursuant to section 119.07, Florida Statutes (2018), because Appellant's argument on appeal necessarily relies on subsequent facts that were not raised in the petition below. Our affirmance is therefore without prejudice.

AFFIRMED, without prejudice.

EDWARDS, EISNAUGLE and SASSO, JJ., concur.