Case ID: sw2d_943/html/0829-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Glennon SWEET, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Paul DELO, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. 71150.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    April 15, 1997.
    Glennon Sweet, Mineral Point, pro se.
    Jeremiah w_ Nixorij GelL) Jef. ferson ^ ^ Att Geii gt ^ for defendanVrespondent.
    Before CRANE, P.J., and GERALD M. SMITH and PUDLOWSKI, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in defendant’s favor on plaintiffs claim that he was denied meaningful access to the courts. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).