Case ID: sw3d_313/html/0236-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Derrick PRUITT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 93440.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    June 15, 2010.
    Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, John M. Reeves, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Derrick Pruitt (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his amended motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 after an evi-dentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).