Case ID: cal_199/html/0780-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "THE COURT.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[S. F. No. 11927.
    In Bank
    August 23, 1926.]
    CALIFORNIA CREDIT & COLLECTION CORPORATION, Respondent, v. EMMA R. D. MOONEY, Appellant.
    
       Promissory Notes — Fraudulent Representations. — Judgment " reversed upon authority of California Credit 4 Col. Corp. v. Bandall (Cal. App). 244 Pac. 958, California Credit 4 Col. Corp. v. Goodin (Cal. App.), 246 Pac. 121, and California Credit 4 Col. Corp. v. Carpenter (Cal. App.), 246 Pae. 126.
    APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Napa County. Edward I. Butler, Judge Presiding. Reversed.
    Clarence N. Riggins for Appellant.
    J. R. Cunnyngham and Daly B. Robnett for Respondent.
   THE COURT.

Upon examination of the record in this case we are satisfied that the trial court was in error as to each of the two main questions presented upon this appeal. We are further satisfied that a practically parallel situation is presented upon this appeal as that presented and considered by the district court of appeal in and for the third appellate district in the cases of California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Randall (Cal. App.), 244 Pac. 958, California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Goodin (Cal. App.), 246 Pac. 121, and California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Carpenter (Cal. App.), 246 Pac. 126.

In the latter two of the above .cases a petition for hearing in this court was denied. Upon the authority of these cases the judgment herein is reversed.