Case ID: ga_120/html/0418-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Evans, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jolly et al. v. Matthews.
    Submitted May 24,
    Decided June 9, 1904.
    Complaint. Before Judge Fite. Gordon superior court. August 1, 1903.
    
      Starr & Erwin, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Cantrell & Bamsaur, contra.
   Evans, J.

The errors assigned were that the verdict was contrary to law and without evidence to support it* and contrary to a designated portion of the charge of the court. The evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to authorize the verdict; and the judgment overruling the motion for new trial is

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.