Case ID: sw3d_534/html/0402-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HIGH PERFORMANCE STL, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent.
    WD 80566
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    ORDER FILED: November 7, 2017
    Rehearing Denied December 14, 2017
    William F. Whealen, Jr., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Bart A, Matanic, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before Division One: Cynthia L.-Martin, Presiding Judge, James Edward Welsh, ' ' Judge and Karen King Mitchell, Judge
   ORDER

Per curiam:

High Performance STL'appeals from a decision by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which found that workers engaged as volleyball coaches performed services for High Performance in “employment,” and for “wages,” within the meaning of sections 288.034 and 288.036, respectively. High Performance argues that there was not sufficient competent evidence in the record to support the Commission’s decision. We affirm the Commission’s decision. Rule 84.16(b). '