Case ID: pa_635/html/0418-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

137 A.3d 572
    Kevin PITTMAN, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondent.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    May 23, 2016.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Parole Board abuse its discretion by summarily denying petitioner credit against his maximum sentence for time that he spent at liberty on parole following his recom-mitment as a convicted parole violator?