Case ID: f-appx_126/html/0430-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert E. DYER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 04-35695.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted March 23, 2005.
    
    Decided April 22, 2005.
    Robert E. Dyer, Westport, WA, pro se.
    Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Robert E. Dyer appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his action challenging the constitutionality of interstate extradition procedures under 18 U.S.C. § 3182. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal, and we may affirm on any proper ground, even if the district court did not reach the issue or relied on different grounds or reasoning. Vestar Dev. II v. Gen. Dynamics Corp., 249 F.3d 958, 960 (9th Cir.2001). We affirm.

Dyer lacks standing to bring this action because he does not allege any “real or immediate threat” of future extradition. See City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, 111, 103 S.Ct. 1660, 75 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.