Case ID: sw3d_361/html/0022-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George FULLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 72705.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Sept. 27, 2011.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 1, 2011.
    Ronald E. Partee, for Appellant.
    Karen L. Kramer, for Respondent.
    Before Division Three: VICTOR C. HOWARD, Presiding Judge, ALOK AHUJA, Judge and KAREN KING MITCHELL, Judge.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

George Fuller appeals from the motion court’s denial of his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 post-conviction case. On appeal, Fuller claims that he was entitled to reopen the Rule 29.15 proceedings because he was abandoned by counsel. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).