Case ID: sw3d_8/html/0191-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DAIRYLAND INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Tarron COBBS, et al., Defendants.
    No. ED 75607.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Dec. 7, 1999.
    Gordon W. Neilson, Lawrence Will-brand, St. Louis, for appellant.
    The Hullverson Law Firm, Stephen H. Ringkamp, Scott L. Kolker, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from an interpleader action, appellant, Gordon Neilson, claims that the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis erred in finding that he did not establish an attorney/client relationship with the respondent, Tarron Cobbs. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts, and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. 
      
      . Tarron. Cobbs' motions to dismiss and for sanctions for frivolous appeal, taken with the case, are denied.