Case ID: sw2d_829/html/0094-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ernest JACOBS, Jr., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Bruce TIPTON, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. 60964.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    April 28, 1992.
    
      Lloyd J. Jordan, St. Louis, for defendant, appellant.
    Charles L. Ford, Les A. Steinberg, Stein-berg & Crotzer, St. Louis, for plaintiff, respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a denial of his motion to set aside a default judgment entered against him in a breach of contract and conversion case. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).