Case ID: f-appx_300/html/0249-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Tyrone Lamont SMITH, a/k/a Blue, a/k/a Tyrone Eady, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 08-6410.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 5, 2008.
    Decided: Nov. 17, 2008.
    Tyrone Lamont Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Spodick Healey, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Lamont Smith appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Smith argues that the district court erred by failing to reduce his sentence under Amendment 706 of the Guidelines, see U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“USSG”) § 2Dl.l(c) (2007 & Supp.2008); USSG App. C, Amend. 706. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith, No. 3:94-cr-00041-jpj-l (W.D.Va. Feb. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.