Case ID: njl_104/html/0171-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHARLES H. HAND, APPELLANT, v. MURRAY RUSHMORE, RESPONDENT.
    Submitted May 27, 1927
    Decided October 17, 1927.
    For the appellant, Winfield 8. Angleman.
    
    For the respondent, William A. Coddington.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirm,anee — The Chibe Justice, Trencíiard, Parker, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yah Buskirk, Mc-Glennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Kone.