Case ID: f2d_73/html/1015-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. William V. BARTLETT, Appellee.
    No. 7408.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Oct. 26, 1934.
    Peirson M. Hall, TJ. S. Atty., Mansel G. Gallahcr, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Ernest D. Fooks, Atty. Dept, of Justice, all of Los Angeles, Cal., and Will G. Beardslee, Director, Bureau of War Risk Litigation, of Washington, D. C., Randolph C. Shaw, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., Thomas E. Walsh, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., and Armistead L. Boothe, Atty. Dept, of Justice, of Washington, D. C.
    Wm. II. Wilson and Wm. Christensen, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
    Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

The record in this ease does not present the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to justify the judgment. Continental Nat. Bank et al. v. National City Bank of New York (C. C. A.) 69 F.(2d) 312. This being the only assignment of error presented by the appellant, the judgment is affirmed.