Case ID: ga-app_31/html/0783-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

15226.
    Holland v. The State.
    Decided March 6, 1924.
    Indictment for bastardy; from Whitfield superior court—Judge Tarver. November 17, 1923.
    
      George G. Glenn, John G. MUchell, for plaintiff in error.
    
      J. M. Lang, solicilor-general, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

1. The alleged newly discovered evidence is cumulative and impeaching and is not of such a character as would likely produce a different verdict upon another trial of the case.

2. There is no substantial merit in any special ground of the motion for a new trial.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodioorth, JJ., concur.