Case ID: so2d_575/html/0230-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Willis C. WOODY, Jr., Appellant, v. Patricia Ann WOODY, Appellee.
    No. 90-2837.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Jan. 29, 1991.
    Michael A. Flowers of Chesser, Wingard, Barr, Whitney, Flowers & Fleet, Shalimar, for appellant.
    Charles J. Kahn, Jr., of Levin, Middle-brooks, Mabie, Thomas, Mayes and Mitchell, P.A., Pensacola, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant has taken a timely appeal from a final order of dissolution of marriage. After filing of the initial brief, however, appellee moved this court for a remand, conceding that the order on appeal did not have sufficient findings of fact to withstand appellate review. See Kim v. Bradshaw, 569 So.2d 532 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Raehn v. Raehn, 557 So.2d 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Appellant has not timely responded to the motion and accordingly we reverse and remand the order here on appeal for entry of an amended final judgment setting forth findings of fact. Either or both parties may, of course, seek appl-late review of the amended final judgment by initiating a new appellate proceeding.

REVERSED.

SHIVERS, C.J., and WENTWORTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.