Case ID: f2d_119/html/0419-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nathaniel L. ABERSON, and Celia M. Broder, Appellants, v. William KLINGELHUT, Klingelhut Siding Co., William C. Blos-sey and Jacob Greendal, Appellees.
    No. 8931.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
    April 10, 1941.
    Barnes, Kisselle, Laughlin & Raisch, of Detroit, Mich., for appellants.
    Swan, Frye & Hardesty, of Detroit, Mich., for appellees.
    Before HICKS and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the court that a motion to docket and dismiss the appeal has been filed by appellees, together with certificate of the clerk of the District Court as required by Rule 19; on consideration whereof, it is now ordered that the appeal be and the same is docketed and dismissed.