Case ID: sw3d_471/html/0405-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Gary L. FULK, Appellant.
    ED 101887
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    FILED: October 6, 2015
    Margaret M. Johnson, 1000 West Ni-fong, Building 7, Suite 100, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent.
    Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Roy L. Richter, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Gary Fulk (“Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment following a jury trial convicting him of production of a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.211, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013; possession of a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.202, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013; and possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to use, in violation of Section 195.233, RSMo (2000). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).