Case ID: ad3d_49/html/0820-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Karolyn Kenedics, Respondent, v Igor Ribolo, Defendant, and Irina Kravis, Appellant.
    [853 NYS2d 903]
   In support of her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her, the defendant Irina Kravis made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). However, in opposition to the motion, the plaintiff raised triable issues of fact (see id.; Fontecchio v Esposito, 108 AD2d 780 [1985]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly denied the defendant’s motion. Prudenti, P.J., Skelos, Miller, Covello and McCarthy, JJ., concur.