Case ID: f-appx_56/html/0172-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Erin Gilland ROBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Randolph ROBY; Estate of Neil 0. Roby; Eva Sowell Roby; Howard County Police Department; Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration; Register of Wills for Howard County, Defendants-Appellees, and Howard County Sheriffs Department; Charles M. Cave, Sheriff of Howard County, Maryland, Defendants. Howard County Government; Anne Ferro; Kay Hartleb, Movants.
    No. 02-2023.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 20, 2003.
    Decided Feb. 26, 2003.
    Erin Gilland Roby, Appellant Pro Se. Robert L. Fila, Law Offices of Robert L. Fila, Columbia, Maryland; Barbara McFaul Cook, County Solicitor, Rebecca Ann Laws, County Solicitor’s Office, Elli-cott City, Maryland; John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Susan Penny White-ford, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Leight Douglas Collins, Assistant Attorney General, Glen Burnie, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Erin Gilland Roby appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying various interlocutory and post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Roby v. Roby, No. CA-01-1413-L (D. Md. Jan. 28, 2002; Apr. 5, 2002; Aug. 6, 2002; filed Aug. 14, 2002, entered Aug. 15, 2002; filed Sept. 3, 2002, entered Sept. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.