Case ID: cust-ct_57/html/0821-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Rao, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Before the Second Division,
    October 24, 1966
    No. P66/289. —
    No. P66/290. —
    No. P66/291. —
    No. P66/292. —
    No. P66/293. —
    No. P66/294. —
    The American Rolex Watch Corp. v. United States, protests 58/25127, etc. (New York). Paul Breguette Watch Co., Inc. v. United States, protests 58/25128, etc. (New York). Movado Watch Agency, Inc. v. United States, protests 61/13101, etc. (New York). Eterna Watch Co. of America, Inc. v. United States, protests 61/13878, etc. (New York). Concord Watch Co., Inc. v. United States, protests 61/19526, etc. (New York). American Rolex Watch Corp. v. United States, protests 65/19962, etc. (New York).
   Rao, C. J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of watch movements similar in all material respects to those the subject of Benrus Watch Company et al. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 28, C.D. 2469), wherein said watch movements were held to be unadjusted and, accordingly, not subject to any additional duty for adjustments, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.