Case ID: njl_129/html/0517-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ALICE DESCHAMPS AND DESIRE JOSEPH DESCHAMPS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. L. BAMBERGER & CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued October 22, 1942
    Decided February 8, 1943.
    For the respondents, John W. McGeehan, Jr.
    
    For the appellant, George F. Lahey, Jr.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court, with the reservation, however, that we do not consider or pass upon the points argued in the briéf of appellant respecting alleged error committed by the trial court in certain rulings on evidence made during the course of the trial, and alleged error contained in the submission of the matter to the jury, for the reason that these points are not properly set forth in the grounds of appeal. Booth v. Keegan, 108 N. J. L. 538.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

For affirmance—Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Dear, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 8.

For reversal—The Chancellor, Case, Colie, Wells, JJ. 4.