Case ID: sw2d_287/html/0489-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DICE, Commissioner.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Maude PAULEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
    No. 27961.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Jan. 18, 1956.
    On Motion to Reinstate Appeal Feb. 29, 1956.
    Bourne & Porter, by H. B. Porter, Dumas, for appellant.
    Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.
   DICE, Commissioner.

The conviction is for violation of the liquor law; the punishment, a fine of $250.

In the absence of a bond or recognizance on appeal, or a showing that appellant is in jail, we are without jurisdiction of this misdemeanor appeal. Braun v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 394, 257 S.W.2d 708; Alexander v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 269 S.W.2d 682; Warren v. State,Tex.Cr.App., 269 S.W.2d 682.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal

PER CURIAM.

At a former date, this appeal was dismissed because of the absence of a bond or recognizance or a showing that appellant was in jail.

A proper appeal bond has been filed.''.

Thg appeal ⅛ reinstáted; and the case ⅛ 1 * £ ' ' ; . ”

The record contains no statement of facts of bills of exception, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.