Case ID: njl_116/html/0178-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ANNA HOLLINGSHEAD ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. NICODEMUS ZEMKOSKI ET AL., APPELLANTS.
    Submitted October 25, 1935 —
    Decided January 31, 1936.
    For the respondents, Jacob Gold and David Raskin.
    
    For the appellants, James H. Sanderson and Abraham I. Feltman.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.