Case ID: ind_107/html/0598-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Howe, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 12,649.
    Rochester, Rensselaer and St. Louis Railway Co. v. Miller. Rochester, Rensselaer and St. Louis Railway Co. v. Spencer. Rochester, Rensselaer and St. Louis Railway Co. v. McKee. Rochester, Rensselaer and St. Louis Railway Co. v. Ferguson. Rochester, Rensselaer and St. Louis Railway Co. v. Edwards. Rochester, Rensselaer and St. Louis Railway Co. v. Cook. Rochester, Rensselaer and St. Louis Railway Co. v. Jenkins. Rochester, Rensselaer and St. Louis Railway Co. v. Fulkerson. Rochester, Rensselaer and St. Louis Railway Co. v. Woodruff.
    
      No. 12,650.
    No. 12,651.
    
      Filed Sept. 15, 1886.
    No. 12,652.
    No. 12,653.
    No. 12,654.
    No. 12,655.
    No. 12,656.
    No. 12,657.
    From the Miami Circuit Court.
    
      J. Slick and E. Myers, for appellant.
    
      W. I. IToxmrd, J. IT. Bibler, M. L. Essick and 6. W. Holman, for appellees.
   Howe, C. J.

In each of the above entitled causes, the same questions

are presented for decision, in the same manner and by the same appellant, as those which were considered and decided by this court, at its present term, in Rochester, etc., R. W. Co. v. Jewell, ante, p. 332. In each of such causes, therefore, we must hold upon the authority of the case cited and for the reasons given in our opinion therein, that no error was committed by the circuit court which would authorize the reversal of its judgment.

In each of the above entitled causes the judgment below is affirmed, with costs.