Case ID: ga_259/html/0590-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

S89G0271.
    REESE v. THE STATE.
    (387 SE2d 894)
    Decided November 22, 1989.
    
      Hackel & Hackel, Thomas M. Hackel, for appellant.
    
      Harry D. Dixon, Jr., District Attorney, Richard E. Currie, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.
   Per curiam.

After plenary consideration of this matter (Reese v. State, 191 Ga. App. 887 (383 SE2d 149) (1989)), it is found not to satisfy the criteria for the grant of certiorari, and the writ is therefore vacated.

All the Justices concur.