Case ID: nys_8/html/0933-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mechanics’ & Traders’ Bank, Appellant, v. Loucheim, Respondent.
    
      (Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.
    
    January 24, 1890.)
    Appeal from special term, New York county.
    For appeal from order denying motion to vacate attachment, see ante, 520.
    Argued before Van Brunt, P. J., and Brady and Daniels, JJ.
    
      A. J. Dittenhoefer, for appellant. Franklin Bien, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The attachment referred to in the complaint in this action having been vacated by a decision handed down herewith, {ante, 520,) the right to an injunction necessarily falls, and the order denying the motion to continue the injunction should be affirmed, with. $10 costs and disbursements.