Case ID: njl_121/html/0534-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JACOB KAPLAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JACK EPSTEIN, TRADING AS CENTURY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Submitted October 28, 1938
    Decided January 13, 1939.
    
      For the appellant, Harry Kay.
    
    For the respondent, Goldberg & Goldberg.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion delivered per curiam by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Walker, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.