Case ID: nj-eq_71/html/0769-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William F. Barclay, respondent, v. Charles Roome Parmele Company, appellant.
    [Argued June 26th, 1906.
    Decided January 2d, 1907.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery, advised by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in 70 N. J. Fq. (J/. Robb.) @18.
    
    iliessrs. Guild, hum & Tamblyn and Mr. Arthur A. Mickell (of the New York bar), for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. Goult, Howell & Sm,iih and Mr. Henry W. Goodrich, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam:.

The decree of the court of chancery is affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Emery in the court below.

For affirmance—Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Eeed, Trenohard, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill—14.

For reversal—None.