Case ID: so2d_280/html/0699-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Interest of M. H., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 72-1428.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 24, 1973.
    Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender and Lewis S. Kinder, Asst. Public Defender and Gordon Selridge, Legal Intern, for appellant.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant was adjudicated delinquent and seeks reversal of his adjudication on the grounds that the evidence was insufficient to establish his guilt. We have carefully considered the briefs and argument of counsel in the light of the record on appeal and have concluded that there was sufficient competent evidence before the court to support the adjudication and to overcome the hypothesis of innocence. See Carr v. State, 45 Fla. 11, 34 So. 892 (1903) and Betancourt v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 124. Accordingly, the adjudication of delinquency is affirmed.

Affirmed.