Case ID: ind_12/html/0315-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Littler and Another v. Lamb.
    
      Monday, May 30.
    
    APPEAL from the Fontain Court of Common Pleas.
   Per Curiam.

Suit upon a promissory note executed by Elijah Littler and Jackson King to Barnabas Lamb, and by him assigned to Jacob Lamb, the plaintiff. The note is for 1,000 dollars, due ten days after date.

Answer, setting up that at the time Littler and King gave the note to Barnabas Lamb, Littler held a note for 1,000 dollars against said Barnabas; that King is simply a surety on the note to Barnabas, and hence, the defendants claim that it is a set-off to the note in suit. ’ This note held by Littler, was assigned to him by E. C. Sumner, a few days before he gave the note in question to Barnabas Lamb.

Replication, that the consideration for the note made payable to Barnabas, was cattle sold by Jacob Lamb, to Littler; that the note was made payable to Barnabas by fraud; and that Littler,in purchasing the cattle, was acting secretly for Sumner, and resorted to the mode adopted in giving the note to Barnabas, for Jacob's cattle, at Sumner's instigation, as a means of obtaining the payment of Sumner's note.

The questions to be tried were of fact, alone, and related to the facts of beneficial interest, and fraud.

The cause was first submitted to a jury, who failed to agree, and were discharged. It was subsequently tried by the Court, who rejected the set-off, and found for the plaintiff upon the note sued on.

I Ristine and D. W. Voorhees, for the appellant.

J A. Rice, for the appellee.

There is evidence tending to sustain the finding of the Court. The credibility of the witnesses could be estimated by the Court below more accurately than it can be by this Court.

The judgment is affirmed with 1 per cent, damages and costs.