Case ID: dc_4/html/0350-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      The Court", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Barbara Nixdorff v. Richard Wells.
    To enable a landlord to recover double rent for holding over, the lease must be for a specific term.
    A renting at $60 a year, payable monthly, is not for a specific term, and will not authorize a judgment for double rent.
    Appeal from a justice of the peace, who gave judgment for $10, being double rent for a month, the tenant having held over after the first year, under a demise at $60 a year, payable monthly.
    
      Mr. Marbury, for the appellee.
    No time- for notice to quit is mentioned when the lease will expire by its own limitation. Woodfall, L. & T. 163. A renting at $60 a year, payable monthly, is a renting for one year and no more.
    
      Mr. Redin, contra.
    
    It was a general hiring at $60 a year, not for any limited period. The case of Gordon, in this Court, at the last term, was a specific lease for one year only, and notice to quit was not necessary to recover double rent.
   The Court

(nem. con.) was of opinion that the renting was not clearly shown to be for a specific term, but only at the rate of $60 a year, leaving the term uncertain; and that double rent could not be recovered.

Judgment reversed, with costs.