Case ID: f-appx_120/html/1001-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anthony E. HURLEY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. P.F.Z. PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED; Jack Katz, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 04-2189.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 28, 2005.
    Decided Feb. 18, 2005.
    Anthony E. Hurley, Appellant pro se. Elizabeth C. Honeywell, Jason Thomas Sayers, Venable, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM.

Anthony E. Hurley appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claim against Defendants and denying his subsequent Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hurley v. P.F.Z. Prop., Inc., No. CA-04-1545-WDQ (D. Md. filed June 30, 2004 & entered July 1, 2004; Aug. 3, 2004; Aug. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.