Case ID: ny_233/html/0556-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Regina Bussman, as Administratrix de Bonis Non of the Estate of Anton Bussman, Deceased, Respondent, v. Peter W. Van Peyma et al., Appellants.
    
      Executors and administrators — action to recover on administrator's bond.
    
    
      Bussman v. Van Peyma, 194 App. Div. 951, affirmed.
    (Argued March 7, 1922;
    decided March 21, 1922.)
    Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 23, 1921, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury.
    The action was brought against the sureties upon an administrator’s bond to recover the amount of an adjudged shortage in his accounts.
    
      Frank M. Loomis for appellants.
    
      Dilworth M. Silver for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan and Crane, JJ.