Case ID: so2d_285/html/0051-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eddie HAMMONDS, Appellant, v. The BUCKEYE CELLULOSE CORPORATION and Grace H. Dansby et al., Appellees.
    No. T-420.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Oct. 9, 1973.
    Rehearing Denied Nov. 6, 1973.
    Thomas W. Brown, Brannon, Brown, Norris, Vocelle & Haley, Lake City, and MacFarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, for appellant.
    Byron Butler, Perry, John E. Mathews, Jr., Mathews, Osborne & Ehrlich, Jacksonville, William M. Barr and Paul E. Raymond, Raymond, Wilson, Karl, Conway & Barr, Daytona Beach, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory appeal dismissed.

RAWLS, C. J., and SPECTOR and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

On Petition for Rehearing

PER CURIAM.

Petition for Rehearing denied without prejudice to appellant to apply to the trial court for an injunction in view of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Hammonds v. Buckeye Cellulose Corp., 285 So.2d 7, opinion filed October 10, 1973.

RAWLS, C. J., and SPECTOR and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.