Case ID: ohio-st-3d_84/html/0014-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Fortman, Appellant.
    [Cite as State v. Fortman (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 14.]
    
      (No. 98-899
    Submitted October 13, 1998
    Decided November 25, 1998.)
    
      Mathias H. Heck, Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Cheryl A. Ross, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
    
      Rudd, Silverberg, Zaharieff & Orlins Co., L.P.A., and Anthony J. Zaharieff, for appellant.
   The judgment of the court of appeals on Proposition of Law No. I is affirmed on the authority of State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

The appeal is dismissed as having been improvidently allowed on Proposition of Law No. II.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.