Case ID: so2d_885/html/0877-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Claudia LASKOWITZ, Appellant, v. Steven SHIVER, etc., Appellee.
    No. 3D03-3192.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 23, 2004.
    Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Nov. 10, 2004.
    Gary B. Goldman, North Miami Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Ginsburg, Miami-Dade County Attorney, and James K. Kracht, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee Shiver
    Ronald S. Lowy, Miami Beach, for ap-pellees/intervenors.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and SHEVIN, J., and DAUKSCH, JAMES C., JR., Senior Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a Final Summary Judgment denying a Petition for Writ of Mandamus seeking to compel the County Manager to validate eighty-eight petitions filed for the establishment of a taxing district. We reverse.

Claudia Laskowitz petitioned for the establishment of a Sky Lake Security Guard Special Taxing District. Chapter 18 of the Miami-Dade County Code, which governs the creation and establishment of special taxing districts, provides:

Sec. 18-3(a). Petition. There shall be filed with the Clerk of the Board a petition requesting the creation and establishment of a special taxing district under the provisions of this article, signed by the County Manager or by fifty (50) percentum of the resident owners of property embraced within the proposed district.

Because the petition submitted by Las-kowitz contained the signatures of the requisite 50% of the resident property owners, the County should have validated the petitions so that the next phase of the process for establishing a special taxing district could begin. That eighty-eight of the resident property owners later signed an additional petition against the establishment of the special taxing district is of no effect, as the Miami-Dade Code is only concerned with petitions signed for the establishment of the district.

Accordingly, the Final Summary Judgment is reversed and this matter remanded for the entry of judgment for Laskow-itz.

Reversed and remanded.