Case ID: nys_159/html/1133-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PEOPLE, respondents, v. EISSING CHEMICAL COMPANY, Inc., appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division. Second Department.
    June 29, 1916.)
   Judgment of conviction by the Court of Special Sessions reversed, and now trial ordered. The fire commissioner’s power to make the order set forth in the information did not sufficiently appear. The ordinances and regulations referred to arc not subjects of judicial cognizance, unless proved. Goetz v. Duffy, 171 App. Div. 680, 682, 157 N. Y. Supp. 590. Jenks, P. J.. and Thomas, Carr, Staple-ton, and Putnam, J.T., concur.