Case ID: ad_239/html/0849-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Theresa Caspary, by John Caspary, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Joseph Bardong and Others, Appellants.
   Amended order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence unanimously affirmed, with costs. The motion papers fail to show that any effort was made, prior to the trial, to ascertain where plaintiff was employed. The so-called newly-discovered evidence was available long before the trial and could have been obtained by the exercise of reasonable diligence. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ.