Case ID: f-appx_39/html/0936-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lenzie Lee MURRAY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 02-6661.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted July 25, 2002.
    Decided Aug. 1, 2002.
    Lenzie Lee Murray, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Lenzie Lee Murray, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for return of property pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 41(e) and motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Murray v. United States, No. CA-01-2188-AMD (D. Md. filed Feb. 13, 2002 & entered Feb. 14, 2002; filed Feb. 19, 2002 & entered Feb. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.