Case ID: nys_122/html/1121-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

AMERICAN WOOLEN CO. v. MOSKOWITZ.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    April 11, 1910.)
    Appeal from City Court of Mew York, Special Term. Action by the Amer-can Woolen Company against Harry Moskoivitz. From an order granting a motion for udgment on the pleadings, on the ground that ;he complaint does not state a cause of action, Dlaintiff appeals.
    Reversed, and motion denied.
    Hays, Hershfield & Wolf (Edwin D. Hays, of :ounsel), for appellant.
    Abraham Goldfarb, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

In our opinion, the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a rause of action. The order is therefore reverssd, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the notion denied, with $10 costs.