Case ID: ad3d_125/html/0972-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Erich Milord, Petitioner, v New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Respondent.
    [1 NYS3d 854]—
   Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles Appeals Board dated May 28, 2013, which confirmed the determination of an administrative law judge dated January 18, 2013, after a hearing, finding that the petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 392, and imposed a penalty.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Judicial review of an administrative determination made after a hearing at which evidence was taken is limited to whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence based upon the entire record (see CPLR 7803 [4]). Moreover, the courts may not weigh the evidence or reject the choice made by an administrative agency where there is conflicting evidence and room for choice exists (see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 444 [1987]).

Here, substantial evidence supports the determination of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles Appeals Board that the petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 392 (see Matter of Wagner v Fiala, 113 AD3d 694 [2014]). Dillon, J.P., Leventhal, Chambers and Roman, JJ., concur.