Case ID: utah_4/html/0483-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Boreman, J.:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHARLES DUCHENEAU, Respondent, v. HIRAM HOUSE, Appellant.
    Justicie op the Peace. — Jurisdiction.
    On petition for rehearing, ante p. 369.
    
      Mr. ,T. N. Kimball, for respondent,
    Mr. C. S. Varian, for appellant.
   Boreman, J.:

The petition for rehearing states no new facts or grounds for a reversal of the judgment of the lower court. It is mainly a reargumént of the case. We have repeatedly called attention to the fact that no rehearing will ■ be granted where nothing new and important is offered for our consideration. We again say that we cannot grant a rehearing unless a strong showing- therefor be made. A reargument or an argument, with the court upon the points of the decision, with no new light given, is not such a showing..

The rehearing is denied.

Powers, J., concurred. Zane, C. J., dissented.