Case ID: ad3d_69/html/0454-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Irina Zak, Appellant, v Betty Mintz, Respondent.
    [891 NYS2d 280]
   There was no evidence that defendant refused to obey an order for disclosure or wilfully failed to disclose information. Plaintiff declined the court’s offer to submit interrogatories or to conduct a continued deposition of defendant. Accordingly, denial of the motion was a proper exercise of the court’s discretion (Gross v Edmer Sanitary Supply Co., 201 AD2d 390 [1994]). Concur—Saxe, J.E, Catterson, Moskowitz, DeGrasse and AbdusSalaam, JJ.