Case ID: f-appx_177/html/0649-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kevin Lee LEWIS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. D.L. RUNNELS, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
    No. 04-57010.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued & Submitted April 3, 2006.
    Decided April 18, 2006.
    Kevin Lee Lewis, HDSP-High Desert State Prison, Susanville, CA, pro se.
    Gerson Simon, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
    Robert S. Henry, Esq., AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
    Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, BRIGHT  and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The Honorable Myron H. Bright, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

The facts of this case are known to the parties.

Petitioner Kevin Lee Lewis alleges that his due process rights were violated when the California trial court denied his motion for a continuance and when he was denied access to a law library. We have considered his claims and find that they lack merit. See Kane v. Garcia Espitia, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 407, 163 L.Ed.2d 10 (2005); United States v. Flewitt, 874 F.2d 669, 675 (9th Cir.1989).

Petitioner’s claim that he did not voluntarily waive his right to counsel was not raised before the district court and is not properly before us on appeal. See Young v. Runnels, 435 F.3d 1038, 1044 (9th Cir.2006).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.