Case ID: ohio-st-3d_53/html/0128-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      \n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Leibold.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Leibold (1990), 53 Ohio St. 3d 128.]
    (No. 90-453
    Submitted April 17, 1990
    Decided August 22, 1990.)
    
      J. Warren Bettis, disciplinary counsel, and Charles T. Broum, for relator.
   Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly re-viewed the record, we find sufficient evidence from which to conclude that respondent violated each of the Disciplinary Rules cited in the complaint. Moreover, we agree with the board’s recommendation. Therefore, respondent is ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.