Case ID: sw3d_320/html/0221-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Douglas HERVEY, Appellant.
    No. ED 93489.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Sept. 14, 2010.
    Timothy Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, John W. Grantham, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Douglas Hervey appeals from a judgment of conviction for tampering in the first degree, in violation of Section 569.080.1(2). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2010).