Case ID: f-appx_12/html/0125-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Albert MILLER, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patricia BAILEY; David M. Hinds; Joseph E. Swanton; Hashemee Sayd, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 01-6140.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted April 12, 2001.
    Decided April 18, 2001.
    
      Albert Miller, III, pro se. Burén Riley Shields, III, North Carolina Department of Justice, Kari Russwurm Johnson, Cran-fill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P., Raleigh, NC, for appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Albert Miller, III, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Miller v. Bailey, No. CA-00-172-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.