Case ID: f-appx_17/html/0192-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dan OLIVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D. BRAXTON, Warden; T. Fowlkes, Ombudsman; H. Clark, Operational Officer; RN Tweaty; RN Ray; Doctor Warren; RN Casper; Keeling, Assistant Warden; R. Fleming, Regional Director; Wright, of Records, Defendants-Appellees, and Lieutenant Falzt; Officer Williams; Officer Davidson; Sergeant Mosley; Officer Purdy; Lieutenant Barbour; Lieutenant Ross; Officer Wilson; Sergeant Bernard; Sergeant White; Officer Sutton; S. Harrison, Director, Department of Corrections, Defendants.
    No. 01-6741.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 23, 2001.
    Decided Aug. 30, 2001.
    Dan Oliver, pro se.
    Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

Dan Oliver appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Oliver v. Braxton, No. CA-01-121-AM (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 30, 2001; entered Apr. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.