Case ID: njl_117/html/0115-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHARLES La BETT, APPELLANT, v. HEYMAN BROTHERS, INCORPORATED, RESPONDENT.
    Argued June 2, 1936
    Decided October 2, 1936.
    For the appellant, Thomas Brunetto.
    
    For the respondent, Abner Feinberg.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Raffeety, JJ. 10.

For reversal — N one.