Case ID: so2d_586/html/0101-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Samuel J. CHESTNUT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 91-1096.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Oct. 2, 1991.
    Samuel K. Chestnut, pro se.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Patricia G. Lampert, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.
   UPON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner’s motion for rehearing is denied but we substitute the following for our original opinion.

We dismiss Chestnut’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus without prejudice to his filing motions in the circuit court, under Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 8.111 and 3.800(a), for appointment of counsel and correction of a sentence which petitioner alleges is illegal.

ANSTEAD, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.