Case ID: f-appx_310/html/0959-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth DOWAI, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-10063.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Jan. 14, 2009.
    Filed Feb. 2, 2009.
    Kevin P. Rooney, Assistant U.S., USF-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    John Frederick Garland, Fresno, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: FARRIS, NOONAN and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
   MEMORANDUM

Dowai argues that the prosecution did not meet its burden of proof on all elements of the crime of assault with a dangerous weapon. We reject the argument. Dangerous weapons include objects that are simply used in a manner capable of causing death or serious bodily injury. U.S. v. Riggins, 40 F.3d 1055, 1057 (9th Cir.1994). The district court found there was strong evidence that the victim suffered extreme physical pain. Dowai argues that expert testimony was required to show that feet are capable of causing severe bodily injury or extreme physical pain. On this record the jury could properly deduce whether Dowai’s shod feet were capable of causing serious bodily injury. See U.S. v. Smith, 520 F.3d 1097, 1106-07 (9th Cir.2008). The record includes sufficient evidence that the victim suffered serious bodily injury and extreme physical pain.

Defendant argues that his 96-month sentence is unreasonable. He claims that the district court placed too much emphasis on the nature of the offense and his criminal history. The record indicates that the district court considered all mitigating factors. Nothing more was required. Further, the 96-month sentence was within the middle of the relevant Guidelines range.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.