Case ID: f-appx_274/html/0563-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ian Juan CIPRIANO, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-10292.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 15, 2008.
    
    Filed April 18, 2008.
    Diane J. Humetewa, USPX-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Trautman Dupont, PLC, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, GOULD and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Ian Juan Cipriano (“Cipriano”) appeals the 51-month term of imprisonment imposed by the district judge upon the second revocation of Cipriano’s supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for reasonableness, United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1176 (9th Cir.2006), and we affirm.

Cipriano argues that the district judge based his above-Guidelines sentence on improper considerations. We disagree, and conclude that the district court relied on permissible factors in revoking Cipriano’s supervised release and formulating his sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583; Miqbel, 444 F.3d at 1182-83.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
     
      
      . Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of this case, we do not recount it in detail here.