Case ID: so2d_638/html/0196-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David R. FISHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 93-1683.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    June 17, 1994.
    Howard H. Babb, Jr., Public Defender, and Tania Alavi, Asst. Public Defender, Oca-la, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Mark S. Dunn, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Based on the state’s concession of error in this ease, we reverse the judgment holding Fisher in direct criminal contempt. The state agreed the trial judge failed to comply with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830 specifically because it failed to include in its judgment “a recital of those facts on which adjudication of guilt is based prior to the adjudication of guilt ..which is mandated by the rule.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

W. SHARP, GRIFFIN, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.