Case ID: so2d_461/html/0989-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Henry ESTES and Cleo Estes, his wife, Appellants, v. Frances E. ROCKINSON, et al., Appellees.
    No. AZ-178.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Dec. 17, 1984.
    David A. Barrett and Albert Craig Pen-son of Barrett & Bajoczky, Tallahassee, for appellants.
    Jeanette M. Andrews and S. William Fuller, Jr. of Fuller & Johnson, Tallahassee, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment on the pleadings entered by the trial court is affirmed. In affirming the judgment, we hold that a dental hygienist, when cleaning teeth, is a provider of health care within the meaning of section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1983).

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.