Case ID: ny-2d_58/html/0965-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John K. Lind, Appellant, v Violet Lind, Respondent.
    Argued February 16, 1983;
    decided February 23, 1983
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Irving I. Erdheim, Leonard C. Shalleck and Ralph S. Joseph for appellant.
    
      Alan D. Scheinkman and Miriam M. Robinson for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

That court properly resolved the factual disputes before it in the causes of action for separation and divorce (see Hessen v Hessen, 33 NY2d 406, 408) and it not appearing that that court abused its discretion or committed an error of law, its determinations of alimony, counsel fees and the use of the marital property are beyond our review (see Patron v Patron, 40 NY2d 582, 585).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.