Case ID: or-app_9/html/0428-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PEE CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Submitted on brieis April 14,
    dismissed by opinion April 21,
    petition for rehearing denied May 25,4972
    TILLAMOOK CITY, Respondent, v. BOGART, Appellant.
    
    496 P2d 34
    Oscar D. Hewlett, Portland, for appellant.
    Douglas E. Kaufman, and McMinimee & Kaufman, Tillamook, for respondent.
    Before Schwab, CMef Judge, and Langtry and Thornton, Judges.
   PEE CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on court’s own motion for want of jurisdiction since no constitutional issue is presented in this appeal from conviction for violation of a city ordinance. ORS 221.360. See, City of Portland v. Trumbull Asphalt, 2 Or App 1, 463 P2d 606, Sup Ct review denied (1970); City of Salem v. Kimball, 5 Or App 49, 482 P2d 191 (1971).

In situations like this city attorneys would he well advised to file motions to dismiss, as we previously suggested in footnote 1 in City of Salem v. Kimball, supra.

Appeal dismissed.