Case ID: f-appx_471/html/0739-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re: Avram Moshe PERRY, Debtor. Avram Moshe Perry, Appellant, v. Key Auto Recovery; Chase Auto Finance, Appellees.
    No. 11-60011.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 6, 2012.
    
    Filed March 13, 2012.
    Avram Moshe Perry, Canoga Park, CA, pro se.
    Chad James Brandel, Esquire, Douglas M. Degrave, Esquire, Poliquin & Degrave, Laguna Hills, CA, Holly Jo Nolan, Esquire, Timothy Joseph Silverman, Esquire, Solomon Grindle Silverman Spinella, San Diego, CA, for Appellees.
    
      Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Avram Moshe Perry appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) order denying leave to appeal an interlocutory order of the bankruptcy court setting aside the clerk’s entry of default in an adversary proceeding. We dismiss.

We lack jurisdiction to review the bankruptcy court’s order setting aside the entry of default because it is not an appeal-able final order. See Symantec Corp. v. Global Impact, Inc., 559 F.3d 922, 923 (9th Cir.2009) (order) (entry of default is not a final appealable order); see also Silver Sage Partners, Ltd. v. City of Desert Hot Springs (In re City of Desert Hot Springs), 339 F.3d 782, 787-88 (9th Cir. 2003) (no jurisdiction to review BAP’s exercise of discretion to construe appeal as interlocutory).

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.