Case ID: fla_87/html/0448-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lucile Pero, Plaintiff in Error v. Charles J. Corley, Defendant in Error.
    
    Decision Filed May 7, 1924.
    This case was decided by Division B.
    A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Dade County; H. F. Atkinson, Judge.
    
      Jcmies M. Carson and John M. Murrell, for Plaintiff in Error;
    
      Gautier & Neeley, for Defendant in Error.
   Per Curiam.

The declaration herein does not wholly fail to state a cause of action, therefore the demurrer thereto should have been overruled. See Wertz v. Tampa Electric Co., 78 Fla. 405, 83 South. Rep. 270; Peterson v. Oscar Daniels Co., 83 Fla. 29, 90 South. Rep. 621.

The judgment rendered on the demurrer is reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur..