Case ID: f-appx_256/html/0156-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marco Antonio HERNANDEZ-ROMERO, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-10115.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 13, 2007.
    
    Filed Nov. 26, 2007.
    Mary Sue Feldmeier, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for PlaintiffAppellee.
    Christopher R. Kilburn, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tucson, AZ, for DefendanL-Appellant.
    Before: TROTT, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Marco Antonio Hernandez-Romero appeals from the 51-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and enhanced by (b)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Hernandez-Romero contends that the district court failed to conduct a proper 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) analysis. We disagree. See Rita v. United States, — U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2469, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007); see also United States v. Perez-Perez, No. 06-30341, 2007 WL 3052985 at 1-2 (9th Cir. Oct.22, 2007).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.