Case ID: nys_39/html/1127-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LEGGETT et al., Respondents, v. RADFORD, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    April 7, 1896.)
    Action by Francis H. Leggett, Albert H. Jones, Lewis Wallace, and John 0. Juhring against Walter Radford.
    John F. Brennan, for appellant. James M. Hunt, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

We think this judgment should be sustained upon the theory that the defendant was the principal, and wholly irrespective of any question of guaranty. The complaint does not seek to charge the defendant as guarantor, nor is there anything about a guaranty in the findings of the referee upon which the judgment was directed. Judgment affirmed, with costs.