Case ID: f3d_204/html/0680-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rudolph JONES, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF LAKELAND, TENNESSEE, A Tennessee Municipal Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 97-5917.
    United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
    July 29, 1999.
    Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; MERRITT, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:

“The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous’ opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.”

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

It is further ORDERED that the appellants file a supplemental brief not later than Friday, September 3, 1999, and the appellee file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, October 4, 1999. Reargument is tentatively scheduled for Wednesday, December 8,1999.