Case ID: sw3d_469/html/0503-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Damon J. HOUSTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    ED 101793
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    
    Filed: September 8, 2015
    
      Srikant Chigurupati, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Adam Rowley, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.
    Before: Philip M. Hess P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Damon Houston appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2015). 
      
      . All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. (2015), unless otherwise indicated.