Case ID: f2d_525/html/0986-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Albert ROSETTI, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Caspar WEINBERGER, Secretary, Health, Education & Welfare, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 75-1893.
    United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
    Dec. 17, 1975.
    Irwin W. Barkan, Barkan, Barkan & Neff, David Dachner, Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiff-appellant.
    William W. Milligan, U. S. Atty., Thomas D. Thompson, Columbus, Ohio, Robert J. Kielty, Asst. U. S. Atty, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant-appellee.
   ORDER

Before WEICK, PECK and LIVELY, Circuit Judges.

This appeal, perfected from an order of the district court affirming the defendant-appellee’s denial of social security disability benefits, has been submitted on the record on appeal and on the briefs and oral arguments of the parties. It is concluded that there is substantial evidence in the record to support the appellee’s finding that appellant is possessed of the residual physical capacity to perform light work and his finding that such light work is available in the local and natiorial economy, and therefore,

It is ordered that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is affirmed.