Case ID: f-appx_191/html/0397-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Monroe L. COLEMAN-BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dan DOVE, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 05-5669.
    United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
    Aug. 1, 2006.
    BEFORE: DAUGHTERY and COOK, Circuit Judges; COLLIER, District Judge.
    
    
      
       The Honorable Curtis L. Collier, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, sitting by designation.
    
   OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Monroe Coleman-Bey, acting pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. After reviewing the record, Mr. Coleman-Bey’s bl'ief, and the applicable law, we conclude no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court upon the reasoning set out by that court in its order and opinion entered on March 24, 2005.