Case ID: ad3d_107/html/1604-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel S. Smrek, Appellant.
    (Appeal No. 1.)
    [966 NYS2d. 732]
   Appeal from a judgment of the Cattaraugus County Court (Larry M. Himelein, J.), rendered December 20, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of driving while intoxicated, a class D felony.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: In appeal No. 1, defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of felony driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 1192 [3]; 1193 [1] [c] [ii]), and, in appeal No. 2, he appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of felony driving while intoxicated (§§ 1192 [3]; 1193 [1] [c] [ii]), and aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the second degree (§ 511 [2]). Contrary to defendant’s contention in each appeal, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). Defendant’s valid waiver forecloses any challenge by defendant to the severity of the sentence in each appeal (see id. at 255; see generally People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present — Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Sconiers, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.