Case ID: f-appx_55/html/0694-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Troy R. SAUNDERS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-7619.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 6, 2003.
    Decided Feb. 12, 2003.
    Troy R. Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. William Neil Hammerstrom, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Troy R. Saunders appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel specific performance and granting the Government’s motion to withdraw a previously filed motion for sentence reduction under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Saunders, No. CR-97-344 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 7, 2002 & entered Oct. 8, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.