Case ID: idaho_100/html/0198-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

595 P.2d 1093
    Virgil FAIRCHILD, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. John HATFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 12803.
    Supreme Court of Idaho.
    June 5, 1979.
    Michael B. Sweet and R. Brad Masingill of Ryan & Sweet, Weiser, for defendant-appellant.
    Lary C. Walker of Walker & Sanders, Weiser, for plaintiff-respondent.
    Before SHEPARD, C. J., DONALDSON, BAKES and BISTLINE, JJ., and SCOGGIN, J. Pro Tem.
   PER CURIAM:

Defendant appellant Hatfield brings this appeal from a district court judgment which awarded plaintiff respondent Fair-child $2,820 in damages plus costs and $750 in attorney fees on a claim arising from an arrangement the parties entered into with respect to a used 1950 model D-8 Caterpillar bulldozer. We have reviewed the record in the above cause and find no prejudicial error. I.R.C.P. 52(a); Obray v. Mitchell, 98 Idaho 533, 567 P.2d 1284 (1977). Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs to respondent.

BAKES, J., dissenting.