Case ID: ad3d_47/html/0848-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Laquan Rose, Appellant.
    [849 NYS2d 158]
   Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Konviser, J.), rendered May 26, 2005, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions concerning the prosecutor’s remarks during summation are unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gillespie, 36 AD3d 626 [2007]) and, in any event, are without merit.

Furthermore, since the prosecutor’s remarks during summation were proper, the defendant’s contention that he received ineffective counsel based solely upon a failure to object to the prosecutor’s summation is without merit. Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Miller and Dickerson, JJ., concur.