Case ID: nw2d_911/html/0886-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert Duane BEETER, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
    No. 20180032
    Supreme Court of North Dakota.
    Filed June 5, 2018
    Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, N.D., for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
    Ashlei A. Neufeld, Assistant State's Attorney, Minot, N.D., for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.
   Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Robert Beeter appeals from a district court judgment summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. Beeter argues that the district court erred by concluding his application was barred by the statute of limitations. He contends the 2017 amendment to N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-23(1)(a)(2) is a new interpretation of law and the district court should have retroactively applied it to his case. See N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-01(3)(a)(3). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7), concluding Beeter's application was time-barred. See State v. Iverson , 2006 ND 193, ¶¶ 6-8, 721 N.W.2d 396 (denying retroactive application of statute that became effective after final conviction).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jon J. Jensen