Case ID: f-appx_204/html/0213-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harold SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward F. REILLY, Jr.; Sandra Hilton; Jeffrey S. Kostbar; Charles Lyons; Alberto R. Gonzales; Harley G. Lappin; Richard Holt; John J. Lamanna, Defendants-Appellees. Harold Smith, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward F. Reilly, Jr.; Sandra Hilton; Jeffrey S. Kostbar; Charles Lyons; Alberto R. Gonzales; Harley G. Lappin; Richard Holt; John J. Lamanna, Defendants-Appellees.
    Nos. 06-6225, 06-6315.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 31, 2006.
    Decided: Nov. 3, 2006.
    Harold Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Harold Smith, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition and denying Smith’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Reilly, No. 6:05-cv-03426-HFF (D.S.C. Jan. 9, 2006 & Feb. 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.