Case ID: f-appx_146/html/0687-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Mohammed HAMMOUDE, a/k/a Mohammad Hammoudeh, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 05-6045.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 19, 2005.
    Decided Oct. 26, 2005.
    Mohammed Hammoude, Appellant Pro Se. Robert William Wiechering, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Mohammed Hammoude appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for termination of supervised release. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion or reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Hammoude, CR-00-9-A (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 10, 2005; entered Jan. 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED