Case ID: ad3d_56/html/0485-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rudolph Bethea, Appellant.
    [865 NYS2d 922]—
   Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lewis, J.), rendered June 2, 2006, convicting him of robbery in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to consecutive indeterminate terms of 3x/2 to 7 years’ imprisonment on each count.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by providing that the sentences imposed shall run concurrently with each other; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The People failed to meet their burden of establishing the legality of the consecutive sentences with facts demonstrating that the robbery and the possession of the property stolen during the robbery were “separate and distinct acts” (People v Eddie, 87 NY2d 640, 643 [1996]; see People v Hamilton, 4 NY3d 654 [2005]; People v Ramirez, 89 NY2d 444 [1996]; People v Brown, 80 NY2d 361 [1992]; People v Garcia, 287 AD2d 466 [2001]). Thus, the sentences should have been imposed to run concurrently. Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Garni, JJ., concur.