Case ID: so2d_936/html/1209-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Judy Ann KEETER, Appellant, v. Cebron L. KEETER, Becky E. Keeter and Robert L. Keefer, Appellees.
    No. 1D05-2908.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Sept. 5, 2006.
    Herbert T. Sussman of Boyer, Tanzler & Sussman, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.
    Kevin S. Sanders, Jacksonville, for Ap-pellees.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant argues that the final summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of appellees should be reversed because of disputed issues of fact. We agree that there is a disputed issue of fact whether appellant fulfilled the obligations required by the Agreement for Deed at issue in the case. Therefore, we REVERSE and REMAND for a trial.

ALLEN, DAVIS, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.