Case ID: f-appx_170/html/0707-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald James AMISON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-10978
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    D.C. Docket No. 04-00298-CR-H-S.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    March 15, 2006.
    Brett M. Bloomston, Bloomston & Calla-way, Birmingham, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Laura Drinkard Hodge, U.S. Attorney, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and BIRCH, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Brett M. Bloomston, appointed counsel for Ronald James Amison in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and tiled a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Amison’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.