Case ID: fla_112/html/0257-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anthony Loforte, Inc., et al., v. Aertson P. Keasey, et al.
    
    150 So. 131.
    Special Division B.
    Opinion Filed October 6, 1933.
    
      Gage & Polhill and S’. E. Simmons, for Appellants;
    
      Ed. S. Whitson, for Appellees.
   Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the Order and Decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the reéord having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of' its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said Order and Decree; it is', therefore, considered/ ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said Order and Decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. See Fogg Mill Work & Lumber Co. v. Greer, 102 Fla. 955, 136 Sou. 679 (H. N. 2).

•Affirmed,

Whitfield, P. J., Davis, C. J., and Buford, J., concur.