Case ID: nj-eq_119/html/0351-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frieda Neuman, substituted administratrix, &c., complainant-respondent, v. Hilda Fantl et al., defendants-appellants.
    [Decided January 31st, 1936.]
    
      
      Mr. Saul J. Zucker, for the appellants.
    
      Messrs. Hannoch & Lasser, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Stein in the court of chancery.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Bodine, Heher, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 8.

For reversal—Lloyd, Donges, Perskie, JJ. 3.