Case ID: ala-app_21/html/0684-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BICE, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(106 So. 921)
    Bill MALONE v. STATE.
    (1 Div. 637.)
    (Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    Nov. 24, 1925.
    Rehearing Denied Dec. 15, 1925.)
    Appeal from Circuit Court, Monroe County; John D. Leigh, Judge. Bill Malone was convicted of violating the prohibition, laws, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Malone v. State, 100 So. 912.
    
    Ilybart & Hare, of Monroeville, for appellant. Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    Counsel argue for error in rulings on the trial, but without citing authorities.
    There was sufficient evidence to support the verdict; the affirmative charge was properly refused. Arthur v. State, 19 Ala. App. 311, 97 So. 158.
    
      
       214 Ala. 699.
    
   BICE, J.

The appellant was convicted of the offense of unlawfully having in his possession a still, etc- There was ample evidence to support the verdict returned. Walker v. State, 19 Ala. App. 20, 95 So. 205; Gilbert v. State, 19 Ala. App. 104, 95 So. 502; White v. State, 18 Ala. App. 275, 91 So. 888; Layman v. State, 18 Ala. App. 441, 93 So. 66; Williams v. State, 18 Ala. App. 286, 92 So. 28; Johnson v. State, 18 Ala. App. 72, 88 So. 353. We have examined each of the few exceptions reserved upon the admission or rejection of testimony, and find no merit in any of them. The rulings in each case involved only elementary principles of law, which have been many times discussed by this court. The defendant appears to-have had a fair trial, and, no prejudicial error any-where appearing, the judgment will be affirmed. Affirmed.