Case ID: sw2d_152/html/0368-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HAWKINS, Presiding Judge. GRAVES, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DAVIS v. STATE.
    No. 21610.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    May 7, 1941.
    Rehearing Denied June 25, 1941.
    Joe' C, Luther, of Dallas, for appellant.
    
      Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.
   HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for theft of property under the value of $50, punishment covered by a fine of $25 and forty days in the county jail.

The information seems to be in proper form. The recor'd contains neither hills of exception nor statement of facts. In this condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant complains in her motion because the allegation in the information as to the party from whom the goods were alleged to have been stolen and the said injured party shown in the proo'f do not correspond, and are not the same. This, point thus raised, if shown by the record, might cause a reversal of this cause, but unfortunately for appellant there is no statement of facts found in the record, and we are therefore unable to pass upon this matter.

She also complains because she says that the trial court did not affirmatively submit her defense in this matter in his charge to the jury. Again we do not know what her defense was in the absence of a statement of facts, and we find no requested charge relative thereto in the record.

There is nothing in this motion that we can review.

The motion is overruled.