Case ID: f2d_448/html/0652-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Donald Eugene TAYLOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF TEXAS, et al., Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 71-2056
    Summary Calendar.
    
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Sept. 17, 1971.
    Donald E. Taylor, pro se.
    Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Roland Daniel Green, III, Austin, Tex., for respondents appellee.
    Before THORNBERRY, MORGAN and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of N. Y., et al., 431 F.2d 409, Part I (5th Cir. 1970).
    
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. , 
      
      . See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970).
     
      
      . The contentions presented by the appellant in his habeas petition are: (1) he is entitled to credit on his sentence for time spent while on parole; and (2) he is not required to exhaust state remedies prior to filing a Federal habeas petition because Art. 11.07, Vernon’s Ann. Texas Code of Criminal Procedure is unconstitutional, and therefore an inadequate and ineffective State remedy.