Case ID: f-appx_376/html/0362-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mark HOLPER, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-30775
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    April 20, 2010.
    James Walter Green, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Baton Rouge, LA, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.
    Christopher Albert Aberle, Mandeville, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Mark Holper has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Holper has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Holper’s response discloses no nonfrivo-lous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.