Case ID: f_241/html/0989-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BALL ENGINEERING CO. v. J. G. WHITE & CO.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    April 17, 1917.)
    No. 209.
    In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut.
    Cummings & Lockwood, of Stamford, Conn. (Charles D. Lockwood, of Stamford, Conn., S. L. Swarts, of St. Louis, Mo., and William M. Parke, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.
    J. Kemp Bartlett, of Baltimore. Md., and Lewis Sperry and Harry W. Reynolds, both of Hartford, Conn., for defendant In error.
    William C. Herron, Huston Thompson, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Thomas J. Spellaey, U. S. Atty., of Hartford, Conn., amici curise.
    Before WARD, ROGERS, and HOUGH, Circuit Judges.
    See, also, 212 Fed. 1009.
   PER CURIAM.

Having examined the record presented by this writ, we are of opinion that it differs in no material fact from that considered in 223 Fed. 618, — C. C. A. —. Therefore the decision then made is binding, the issues have been adjudicated, and the judgment below is affirmed, with costs.