Case ID: njl_102/html/0224-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. BERNARD KATZ, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted May 29, 1925
    Decided October 19, 1925.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam .is printed in 3 N. J. Mis. R. 228.
    For the plaintiff in error, Milton M. Unger.
    
    For the defendant in error, John O. Bigelow.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gaedner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.