Case ID: ga_138/html/0096-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Fish, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Williamson v. Edwards.
    April 12, 1912.
    Complaint. Before oudge Gilbert. Taylor superior court. June 13, 1911.
    
      R. S. Foy and C. ~W. Foy, for plaintiff.
    
      Carson & McCutchen, for defendant.
   Fish, C. J.

There was no contention that any error of law was committed upon the trial. There was evidence to authorize the verdict. Neither the alleged newly discovered evidence, nor the alleged misconduct of certain jurors, relatively to both of which there was conflicting evidence on the hearing of the motion, required the grant of a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.