Case ID: nj-eq_139/html/0308-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Herbert Heinig et al., respondents, v. Jacob Smellow et al., appellants.
    [Argued October 23d, 1946.
    Decided January 17th, 1947.]
    
      Mr. Morris Bloom, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. Charles C. Babcock, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Woodruff, and reported at 138 N. J. Eq. 119.

For affirmance — The Chibe-Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Heiier, Perskie, Colie, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Wells, Raeeerty, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, McLean, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.