Case ID: so2d_499/html/0071-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gilberto Martin BRAVO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 86-1340.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 30, 1986.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and May L. Cain, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before BASKIN, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the adjudication and sentence without prejudice to defendant raising the issue pertaining to ineffectiveness of counsel in a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The remaining point lacks merit. See Mixon v. State, 497 So.2d 720 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Stokes v. State, 476 So.2d 313 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

Affirmed.