Case ID: ga-app_29/html/0305-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

13940.
    Poppin v. The State.
    Decided December 13, 1922.
    Accusation of possessing intoxicating liquor; from city court of Carrollton — Judge Hood. August 5, 1922.
    
      Eugene Spradlin, Smith & Millican, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Willis Smith, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence; the alleged newly discovered evidence was not of such a character as would probably cause a different verdict upon another trial, and, moreover, it was met by a strong counter-showing from the State; and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.