Case ID: so2d_192/html/0053-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Fred Eugene DeMERRITT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 66-71.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    Nov. 22, 1966.
    Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender and Phillip A. Hubbart, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before HENDRY, C. J., and CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

This appeal from a felony conviction charges error by the trial court in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained on a search, contending the affidavit on which the search warrant was issued was inadequate. We have considered the contention of the appellant in the light of the record and briefs and are of the opinion the predicate for issuance of the search warrant was adequate and sufficient under the applicable law.

Affirmed.