Case ID: njl_121/html/0589-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LEE COTTON, RESPONDENT, v. N. NELSON KEEN ET AL., APPELLANTS.
    Argued October 21, 1938
    Decided January 13, 1939.
    For the appellants, Hobart, Minard & Cooper.
    
    For the respondent, Frederick P. Schenck.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Walker, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Hehee, J. 1.