Case ID: okla_150/html/0092-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "K'ORNEGAY, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GANT et al. v. OKLAHOMA CITY et al.
    No. 21800.
    Opinion Filed May 12, 1931.
    Rehearing Denied June 30, 1931.
    Twyford & Smith and Womack, Brown & Cund, for plaintiffs in error.
    M. W. McKenzie, Municipal Counselor, and A, L. Hull, Asst. Municipal Counselor, for defendants in error.
   K'ORNEGAY, J.

This is a companion case to the case of Walter H. Gant, Knox L. Garvin, and A. D. Hudspeth, Plaintiffs in Error, v. City of Oklahoma City et al., Defendants in Error, No. 21798, decided this day, 150 Okla. 86,_Pac.-, the difference being that the locality is slightly different, but the wells are in the corporate limits of Oklahoma City, and are subject to ihe same regulations.

On the authority of Gant et al. v. Oklahoma City et al., No. 21798, 150 Okla. 86,-Pac._, this case is affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., and OÜLLISON, SWIN-DALL, ANDREWS, and McNEILL, JJ., concur. RILEY and HEFNER, JJ., absent. CLARK, Y. C. J.„ dissents.