Case ID: nys_144/html/1133-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

O’CONNOR, Respondent, v. JOHN L. SCHWARTZ BREWING CO., Appellant, et al.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    November 12, 1913.)
    Action by David O’Connor against the John L. Schwartz Brewing Company, impleaded with others.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment (135 N. Y. Supp. 794) reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide event. Held, that, the evidence presented upon the trial was insufficient to show that the assignment of the liquor tax certificate and accompanying power of attorney executed by plaintiff to defendant Brewing Company was without sufficient consideration, nor is said evidence sufficient to impeach said contract for fraud; also that there was no evidence of sufficient probative force to show that the defendant Brewing Company ever failed to furnish plaintiff with ale and beer of marketable quality, and that all findings of the trial court inconsistent herewith be and the same hereby are disapproved.