Case ID: sw3d_196/html/0654-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Frank W. PETERING, Appellant.
    No. WD 64748.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    July 18, 2006.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Gary E. Brotherton, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
    Before SMITH, C.J., SPINDEN and HARDWICK, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Frank Petering was convicted, following a bench trial, of first-degree promotion of child pornography and second-degree promotion of child pornography. On appeal, he contends: (1) the trial court erred in admitting evidence obtained pursuant to a search warrant that was unsupported by probable cause; (2) the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction for second-degree promotion of child pornography; and (3) the trial court plainly erred in admitting summaries of witness testimony, to which the parties had stipulated.

Upon review of the briefs of the record, we find no error and affirm the convictions. We have provided the parties with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).