Case ID: ohio-st_172/html/0291-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Johnson v. Eckle, Supt.
    (No. 36695
    Decided May 31, 1961.)
    
      Mr. Elmer Johnson, in propria persona.
    
    
      Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, and Mr. Aubrey A. Wendt, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

A parole violator is not entitled to credit for the period of his declared violations. Consequently, petitioner has not served the maximum sentence imposed and, therefore, is not entitled to his release by habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Radcliee and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.