Case ID: so3d_95/html/0321-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas E. SHARP, Appellant, v. Luis E. BARRETO, Appellee.
    No. 3D11-1382.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 18, 2012.
    Rehearing Denied Aug. 28, 2012.
    
      Shutts & Bowen and William Jay Palmer, for appellant.
    Billbrough & Marks and G. Bart Billb-rough, for appellee.
    Before SHEPHERD and FERNANDEZ, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See In re Estate of Paris, 699 So.2d 301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (Stockman requirement is inapplicable to attorney’s fee claims in probate proceeding); Levine v. Keaster, 862 So.2d 876 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (appellant must identify the particular allegedly erroneous items of challenged attorney’s fees award).