Case ID: ga-app_26/html/0204-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

11950.
    Lanier v. The State.
    Decided January 25, 1921.
    Accusation of larceny; from city court of Metter — Judge Lanier. October 28, 1920.
    
      Kirkland & Kirkland, for plaintiff in error.
    
      G. W. Turner, solicitor, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

1. The alleged newly discovered evidence upon which, the amendment to the motion for a new trial was based was merely cumulative and impeaching in its character, and therefore did not require a new trial.

2. The other grounds of the motion for a new trial, not having been argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke a/nd Bloodworth, JJ., concur.