Case ID: f-appx_385/html/0345-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Antrantrino LEE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 10-6069.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 16, 2010.
    Decided: June 29, 2010.
    Michael Antrantrino Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Antrantrino Lee appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Lee’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lee, No. 5:01-cr-00221-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.