Case ID: conn-app_39/html/0931-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MICHAEL DEVINCENTIS v. VALERIE DEVINCENTIS
    (13609)
    Foti, Lavery and Landau, Js.
    Argued October 31
    decision released December 5, 1995
    
      James V. Somers, with whom, on the brief, were Suzanne L. McAlpine, and John J. Keefe, Jr., for the appellant (plaintiff).
    
      James B. Streeto, for the appellee (defendant).
   PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dissolution. This appeal can best be categorized as a valiant but futile effort to retry the case in this court. No novel principles of law or appellate procedures are involved and to discuss the defendant’s claim would serve no good purpose. See Byrne v. Trice, 170 Conn. 442, 442-43, 365 A.2d 1063 (1976).

The judgment is affirmed.