Case ID: f-appx_589/html/0103-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donnell COPPEDGE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 14-7293.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 18, 2014.
    Decided: Dec. 23, 2014.
    Donnell Coppedge, Appellant Pro Se. Rudulf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Shailika S. Kotiya, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; William Glenn Perry, Office of the United States Attorney, Green-ville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donnell Coppedge appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new sentencing hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Coppedge, No. 4:09-cr-00054-F-l (E.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.