Case ID: bta_4/html/1076-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MoRRis:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LAWRENCE SCHILLIG, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
    Docket No. 5638.
    Decided September 27, 1926.
    
      Lawrence Sehillig, Esg., pro se.
    
      A. Colder Mackay, Esq., for the respondent.
    This is a proceeding for the redetermination of a deficiency of $443.35, income tax for 1922. The Commissioner computed the deficiency upon the basis that the husband is the owner of income under the community property laws of California.
    FINDINGS OP PACT.
    Petitioner is a practicing attorney, and during 1922 resided with his wife in Yuba City, Calif. Money received as fees and from investments was placed in a joint account and subject to the check of both husband and wife. For the year 1922, husband and wife made separate returns, dividing the income of the community in half. The wife paid her tax by check on the joint account. The Commissioner refused to allow separate returns to be filed, holding that the husband should be taxed for the income of the community, and determined the deficiency here presented.
   OPINION.

MoRRis:

In view of our decision in the Appeal of D. Cerruti, 4 B. T. A. 682, we are of the opinion that the determination of the Commissioner must be sustained.

Judgrmnt for the Commissioner.