Case ID: sw2d_887/html/0739-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary Elizabeth RENDE, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Richard Joseph RENDE, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
    Nos. 64387, 64388.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Nov. 1, 1994.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 8, 1994.
    Mark Howard Kruger, Randall B. Kahn, Clayton, for appellant.
    Allan F. Stewart, Clayton, Stephen M. Hereford, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before CRANE, P.J., and KAROHL and CRAHAN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal and a cross-appeal from an order of the trial court modifying maintenance. We have reviewed the record and the briefs filed by the parties and find the circuit court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prec-edential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).