Case ID: so2d_589/html/0467-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Pedro FELICIANO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 91-189.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 3, 1991.
    
      Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Diane Y. Ward, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Marc E. Brandes, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before BASKIN, JORGENSON and COPE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We reverse the conviction pursuant to the controlling authority of Hernandez v. State, 572 So.2d 969 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). The trial court’s inquiry did not comply with the requirements established by Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971). Smith v. State, 500 So.2d 125 (Fla.1986); see Brazell v. State, 570 So.2d 919 (Fla.1990). The cause is remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.