Case ID: cma_22/html/0374-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES, Appellee v THOMAS PETER PLYS, Seaman Apprentice, U. S. Navy, Appellant
    No. 26,677
    June 22, 1973
    
      Captain D. A. Higley, USMC, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.
    
      Lieutenant Colonel G. L. Bailey, USMC, and Lieutenant E. Alan Hécht-kopf, JAGC, USNR, were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam:

In this case, evidence of a proceeding under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 815, in which the accused had been restricted as punishment, was admitted at sentencing. The decision of the Court of Military Review is affirmed. United States v Shamel, 22 USCMA —, — CMR — (June 22, 1973).

Chief Judge Darden would affirm the decision below for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in United States v Alderman, 22 USCMA 298, 46 CMR 298 (1973).