Case ID: ohio-st-3d_130/html/0080-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Brock, Appellant, v. Niemeyer, Judge, et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as Brock v. Niemeyer, 130 Ohio St.3d 80, 2011-Ohio-4704.]
    (No. 2011-0470
    Submitted September 7, 2011
    Decided September 21, 2011.)
    Dennis R. Brock, pro se.
   Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment dismissing the complaint and denying the motion of appellant, Dennis R. Brock, to allow his cause to proceed. Brock’s complaint alleged violations of his civil rights pursuant to R.C. 2921.52(E). Brock’s complaint invoked neither the original nor the appellate jurisdiction of the court of appeals. Section 3(B)(1) and (2), Article IV, Ohio Constitution. We also deny appellant’s motions for leave to correct and to direct the appellate court to attach requested documents.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.