Case ID: ad3d_144/html/0934-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Nicholas Zvegintzov, Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority, Respondent.
    [41 NYS3d 715]
   In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York City Transit Authority Transit Adjudication Bureau Appeals Board dated June 25, 2014, affirming a decision of a hearing officer dated March 28, 2014, finding that the petitioner entered into the respondent’s facilities in violation of 21 NYCRR 1050.4 (a) and imposing a fine, the petitioner appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sweeney, J.), dated April 15, 2015, which granted that branch of the respondent’s motion which was, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) and 7804 (f) to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action, and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order and judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, that branch of the respondent’s motion which was, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) and 7804 (f) to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action is denied, the petition is reinstated and granted, the determination dated June 25, 2014, is annulled, and the decision dated March 28, 2014, is vacated.

Under the unique facts and circumstances of this particular case, that branch of the respondent’s motion which was, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) and 7804 (f) to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action should have been denied, the petition should have been granted, the determination dated June 25, 2014, should have been annulled, and the decision dated March 28, 2014, should have been vacated.

Leventhal, J.P., Cohen, Miller and LaSalle, JJ., concur.