Case ID: pa-super_88/html/0033-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Blumberger, Appellant, v. Nowotavska.
    Argued April 14, 1926.
    Appeal No. 33, April T., 1926, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Indiana County, September T., 1924, No. 119, in the case of I. Blumberger v. Anna Nowotavska.
    Before Porter, P. J., Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn, Gawthrop and Cunningham, JJ.
    Affirmed.
    Judgment by confession opened and case tried. Before Langham, P. J.
    The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.
    Verdict for defendant on which judgment was entered. Plaintiff appealed.
    
      Errors assigned were the various rulings on evidence and the charge of the court.
    
      John L. Getty, for appellant.
    
      E. Walker Smith, for appellee.
    April 30, 1926:
   Per Curiam,

This case was tried below with Blumberger v. Bernot, No. 34, April T., 1926, and was argued here with the appeal in that case.

The questions raised are substantially the same, though an additional assignment of error was printed in. the brief. It does not require separate discussion.

No assignments of error were filed as required by Rule 60; for that reason, and as stated in the opinion this day filed in Blumberger v. Bemot, (supra) this appeal is dismissed.