Case ID: njl_65/html/0684-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. THOMAS DUGAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued November 20, 1900
    Decided March 4, 1901.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiff in error, Joseph ÍI. Noonan.
    
    For the defendant in error, James S. Erwin, prosecutor of the pleas.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Yan Syckel in that court. Ante p. 65.

For affirmance—-Ti-ie Chancellor, Dixon, Collins, Fort, G-arretson, Bogert, Krueger, Hendrickson, Adams, Yredenburgi-i, Yoorhees. 11.

For reversal—Hone.