Case ID: f3d_891/html/0001-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dismissed.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Eduardo ESTERAS-ROSADO, Defendant, Appellant.
    No. 16-1903
    United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
    Entered: January 24, 2017
    Mariana E. Bauza Almonte, Maritza Gonzalez-Rivera, US Attorney's Office, San Juan, PR, for Appellee.
    Alejandro Jose Cepeda-Diaz, McConnell Valdes LLC, Anita Hill-Adames, Anita Hill Law Office, San Juan, PR, Eduardo Esteras-Rosado, Catano, PR, for Defendant, Appellant.
    Before Howard, Chief Judge, Torruella and Thompson, Circuit Judges.
    JUDGMENT
    Eduardo Esteras-Rosado appeals pro se from the district court's interlocutory order denying his motion to dismiss the criminal indictment based on purported speedy trial violations. We DISMISS the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because such orders are not immediately appealable under these circumstances. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292 ; see United States v. Kane, 955 F.2d 110, 110-111 (1st Cir. 1992) (per curiam); United States v. Moller-Butcher, 723 F.2d 189, 190-91 (1st Cir. 1983). Defendant's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED as moot.
   Dismissed.