Case ID: ohio-st-3d_42/html/0082-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State, ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer et al., Appellees, v. Court of Common Pleas of Clermont County; Ringland, Judge, Appellant.
    [Cite as State, ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer, v. Court of Common Pleas of Clermont Cty. (1989), 42 Ohio St. 3d 82.]
    (No. 88-1124
    Submitted February 8, 1989
    Decided April 26, 1989.)
    
      Keating, Muething & Klekamp and Richard L. Creighton, Jr., for appellee Cincinnati Enquirer.
    
      Wood & Lamping and William R. Ellis, for appellee Cincinnati Post.
    
      George E. Pattison, prosecuting attorney, and Thomas L. Blust, for appellant.
   Per Curiam.

Appellees have withdrawn their request for access to the transcript and identification of the witness. We cannot simply dismiss the appeal, however, for that would leave appellant bound by the judgment of the court of appeals, whether appellees desire that judgment’s enforcement or not.

Accordingly, we remand this cause to the court of appeals for further proceedings.

Cause remanded.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.