Case ID: f-appx_4/html/0478-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kenneth THUNDERBIRD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Quinn DEWALD; Roselyn White; Melanie White; Tamara Dewald, Defendants, and Irene White; Jodi Winnwalker, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 00-35145.
    D.C. No. CV-99-00675-ALA.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 12, 2001 
    
    Decided Feb. 22, 2001.
    Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      . The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Kenneth Thunderbird, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order filed on December 13, 1999. We have not considered issues in the opening brief that were not raised in Thunderbird’s original complaint. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir.1999). We deny as moot Ronald Sticka’s motion to dismiss the case.

AFFIRMED. 
      
      . This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.