Case ID: njl_117/html/0147-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WALTER DRAGAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. NATHAN GROSSMAN ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Argued June 2, 1936
    Decided October 2, 1936.
    For the appellants, Abraham J. Isserman.
    
    For the respondents, Hugh F. Doherty and Hicks, Kuhlthau & Thompson.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.