Case ID: f-appx_390/html/0234-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Curtis D. SHULER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John N. VAUGHN, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 10-6228.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 27, 2010.
    Decided: Aug. 5, 2010.
    Curtis D. Shuler, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
    
      Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Curtis D. Shuler appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Shuler v. Vaughn, No. 5:08-ct-03088-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.