Case ID: sw2d_834/html/0263-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Harold R. LAMASTER, Appellant.
    Nos. WD 43718, WD 45360.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Aug. 25, 1992.
    Anthony C. Cardarella, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Joan P. Edwards, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before TURNAGE, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and HANNA, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from conviction of second degree robbery. Section 569.030 R.S.Mo. 1986. This appeal has been consolidated with his appeal from the denial of a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, after an evidentiary hearing. Rule 29.-15(1).

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

The appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief is dismissed for failing to raise any issues with respect thereto. State v. Gillispie, 790 S.W.2d 519, 520 (Mo.App.1990); State v. Mayo, 784 S.W.2d 897 (Mo.App.1990).