Case ID: sw3d_90/html/0545-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Randy HENDRIX, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 80615.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Nov. 19, 2002.
    Raymond J. Capelovitch, Assistant State Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Randy Hendrix, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. He contends his plea attorney failed to inform him about his right to testify, thereby rendering his guilty plea unknowing and involuntary.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a mem’oran-dum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).