Case ID: f-appx_193/html/0192-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Luther JENKINS, IV, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 06-6303.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 25, 2006.
    Decided: Aug. 1, 2006.
    Luther Jenkins, IV, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Luther Jenkins, IV, appeals the district court’s order denying his “Place Holder Motion Challenging Subject Matter Jurisdiction Pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 1331[sic].” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jenkins v. United States, No. 3:99-er-00021-ALL, 2006 WL 247906 (W.D.N.C. filed Feb. 7, 2006 & entered Feb. 8, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.