Case ID: f-appx_544/html/0543-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ashekul MOWLA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-50787
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Nov. 6, 2013.
    Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Michael Clark Gross, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Ashekul Mowla has been charged with conspiring to manufacture, distribute, and possess with the intent to distribute a controlled substance and controlled substance analogue and conspiring to commit money laundering. See 18 U.S.C. § 956(h); 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a), 846. He appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to revoke the magistrate judge’s order of detention pending his trial. Mowla contends that he is not a flight risk or a danger to the community.

The record evidence supports the district court’s determination that no conditions exist that would reasonably assure Mowla’s appearance and the safety of the community where he is to be released pending trial. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Mowla’s release pending trial. United States v. Rueben, 974 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir.1992); United States v. Hare, 873 F.2d 796, 798-99 (5th Cir.1989).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.