Case ID: ny-2d_59/html/0670-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of John L. Lavelle et al., Respondents, v Anna M. Gonzalez, Appellant, and Matteo Lumetta et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents.
    Argued April 29, 1983;
    decided April 29, 1983
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Paul Henry Janis and James R. Sandner for appellant.
    
      Martin E. Connor for respondents.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of that court.

Arguments raised by appellant in our court grounded on the manual and regulations promulgated by the board of education with the approval of the board of elections are unavailing inasmuch as the provisions of the Education Law allow for the promulgation of such regulations only to the extent that they are not inconsistent with the provisions of the Education Law (Education Law, § 2590-c, subd 6, pars [1], [32]). The latter law includes through incorporation by reference the provisions of the Election Law in which the Appellate Division rested its determination. (Education Law, § 2590-c, subd 6, par [31]).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons concur; Judge Fuchsberg taking no part.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.