Case ID: ga_249/html/0429-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per curiam. Gregory, Justice,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

38523.
    BAKER v. BAKER et al.
    Decided May 26, 1982.
    
      Fred W. Rigdon, Jr., for appellant.
    
      Larkin M. Fowler, for appellees.
   Per curiam.

Judgment affirmed without opinion pursuant to Rule 59.

All the Justices concur, except Gregory, J., who concurs specially.

Gregory, Justice,

concurring specially.

I concur in the majority decision to affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment. I write only to point out to the parties that our decision does not rest upon the failure to make tender, as we conclude tender was riot necessary.

We have examined the record and determine that, as to fraud, the trial court correctly found there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and appellees are entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Code Ann. § 81A-156 (c).