Case ID: colo_132/html/0254-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Knauss", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 17,625.
    James T. Gravitt v. Charles R. Sloggett.
    (287 P. [2d] 274)
    Decided August 29, 1955.
    Rehearing denied September 19, 1955.
    Messrs. Buckles & Baker, for plaintiff in error.
    Messrs. McComb, Zarlingo & Mott, for defendant in error.
    
      En Banc.
    
   Mr. Justice Knauss

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Defendant Gravitt invited plaintiff Sloggett to go on a week-end fishing expedition in North Park near Walden, Colorado. Defendant drove his automobile. Sloggett was seriously injured in an accident which occurred on the return trip, and in an action brought against Gravitt had favorable verdict and judgment in the trial court. It is here urged that'the evidence did not show conduct on the part of defendant “consisting of a wilful and wanton disregard to the rights of others” necessary to establish liability under our guest statute.

-There was competent evidence to the effect that defendant drove at an excessive speed, seventy miles per hour or more; that defendant was “exhausted,” “sleepy,” “drowsy” and gave no heed to repeated warnings of plaintiff concerning his driving.

Under proper instructions, the jury resolved the issues in favor of plaintiff and there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support its verdict.

We have said concerning driver hosts, that if conscious of his conduct and existing conditions, he knew that injury would probably result, the requirements of the statute are met. Foster v. Redding, 97 Colo. 4, 45 P. (2d) 940; Dameron v. West, 126 Colo. 435, 250 P. (2d) 592. The question of liability in this case was properly left to the jury.

We have considered the other matters urged for reversal and find them without merit.

The judgment is affirmed.