Case ID: f-appx_34/html/0144-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nathan FISHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREENVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; E.E. Ware, Officer #515; T.D. Hampton, Officer; K.D. Durham, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 02-6073.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted April 30, 2002.
    Decided May 15, 2002.
    Nathan Fisher, Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr., Chapman, Harter & Groves, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Nathan Fisher appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fisher v. Greenville County Sheriff’s Office, No. CA-99-3473-2-08 (D.S.C. Dec. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.