Case ID: sw3d_298/html/0119-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jermaine C. PADEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 69750.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Sept. 15, 2009.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 27, 2009.
    Application for Transfer Denied Dec. 22, 2009.
    S. Kate Webber, for Appellant.
    Robert J. Bartholomew, for Respondent.
    Before Division Two: VICTOR C. HOWARD, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jermaine Paden appeals the circuit court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Paden claims that the circuit court clearly erred in denying his motion because his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).