Case ID: sc_60/html/0047-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Judge Townsend,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROWELL v. McLENDON, TREAS. OF FLORENCE CO.
    Action by W. B. Rowell, as a taxpayer and as guardian ad litem of Herbert M. Rowell, Ann E. Rowell and Emma G. Rowell, on behalf of himself and his wards and all others of like interest, against J. O. McLendon, as treasurer of Florence County, and W. H. Malloy, E. P. Covington, P. A. Wilcox, John L. Barringer and V. M. Hanner, as commissioners of the Florence Graded School, for injunction. Heard by Judge Gary, September, 1900, and complaint dismissed. From this judgment plaintiffs appeal.
    
      
      Messrs. W. F. Clayton and Wm. J. Cherry, for appellants.
    
      Messrs. S. W. G. Shipp and F. S. Willcox, contra,
    cite: Legislature permitted various localities to levy additional taxes for schools: 18 Stat., 640, 231; 19 Stat., 613, 1167; 20 Stat., 1402. Con. 1895, art. 17, sec. XI., par. 1, does not repeal such acts: 22 Stat., 485, 5x4; proviso to art. 17, sec. XI., par. 1. Such acts not contrary to Con. 1868: Con. 1868, art. X.; 13 S. E. R., 120; 57 S. C., 126.
    March 28, 1901.
   The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Judge Townsend,

acting Associate Justice in place of Justice Gary. The object of this action .is to enjoin the commissioners of the Florence Graded School from collecting from the plaintiffs supplementary tuition fees, and to enjoin the county treasurer from paying the poll and constitutional three mill tax for the use of said schools.

This case involves the same principles of law as the case of George P. Ploller and others against the Rock Hill School District and others; and, as the facts in the two cases are similar, the two cases were heard together in this Court. This being the case, it is deemed unnecessary to repeat what has been said in that case. Applying the principles announced in that case to the issues in this case, the Circuit Judge should be sustained.

It is the judgment of this Court, that the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.