Case ID: ohio-st-3d_66/html/0039-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      \n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanford.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanford (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 39.]
    (No. 92-2169
    Submitted January 6, 1993
    Decided March 3, 1993.)
    
      
      J. Warren Bettis, Disciplinary Counsel, and Dianna L. Chesley, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
    
      George D. Jonson, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. Respondent’s crime was a serious breach of trust. However, the record indicates remorse, and we believe there may be potential for rehabilitation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio without credit for time previously spent under suspension. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.