Case ID: f2d_10/html/1019-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Louis HURWITZ, Trading as United Postcard Supply Company, Appellant, v. J. Frank MEYER, Trading as the Exhibit Supply Company, Appellee.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
    February 23, 1926.)
    No. 3371.
    Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Thompson, Judge.
    For opinion below, see 5 F.(2d) 370.
    Thomas C. Egan, John M. Patterson, and Wolf, Patterson, Block & Schorr, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
    Kennard N. Ware, Charles H. Howson, Howson & Howson, and Robert T. McCracken, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.
    Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

On presentation of affidavits and after hearing the parties, the court below granted a preliminary injunction, the effect of which is to preserve the status in quo and prevent any further alleged injury to the plaintiff’s current business. After due consideration had, we find no ground for convicting the court of error in so doing, as it has, in its opinion, sufficiently vindicated its present action at this stage of the case.

The appeal is therefore dismissed, at the appellant’s cost.