Case ID: sw2d_953/html/0954-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Debra Ann BOLLINGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James Louis KELLOGG, Defendant-Respondent.
    No. 71050.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Oct. 28, 1997.
    Cervantes & Associates, Leonard P. Cervantes & Frank Carretero, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Rabbitt, Pitzer & Snodgrass, P.C., Gary E. Snodgrass, Douglas S. Dove & Paula J. Coughlin, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion would not have precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order. 1-4 Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).