Case ID: njl_97/html/0585-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROBERT H. WILLIAMS, RESPONDENT, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Submitted April 13, 1922
    Decided June 19, 1922.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 96 N. J. L. 350.
    For the respondent, Alexander Simpson.
    
    For the appellant, Wall, Haight, Carey & Hartpence.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Swayze, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheiwer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Kone.