Case ID: so2d_643/html/0001-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Paul DIMARE and Dimare Homestead, Inc., Appellants, v. BARNETT BANK OF SOUTH FLORIDA, N.A., Appellee.
    No. 93-2283.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 19, 1994.
    On Motion for Rehearing Aug. 9, 1994.
    Mishan, Sloto,' Hoffman & Greenberg, and Steven Mishan and Carol L. Cox, Miami, for appellants.
    Baker & McKenzie, and Richard J. Ovel-men and Gary M. Carman, Miami, for appel-lee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and LEVY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We adhere to our original opinion affirming the trial court with the exception that we reverse that portion of the trial court’s order which denied Appellants prejudgment interest. In connection with that sole issue, the cause is remanded with directions to the trial court to grant Appellants prejudgment interest beginning on August 13, 1987.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part with directions.