Case ID: sw3d_92/html/0308-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Emmett HURT and Dorothy Hurt, his wife, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. Peggy ANDERSON, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 80742.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division.
    Dec. 17, 2002.
    Clinton B. Roberts, Sonya D. Day, Farmington, MO, for appellant.
    David L. Mayhugh, Park Hills, MO, for respondent.
    Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, C.J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., and MARY R. RUSSELL, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Peggy Anderson (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and order denying her motion to set aside the default judgment entered against her. Defendant argues the trial court (1) abused its discretion by erroneously applying a “free from negligence” standard in violation of Rule 74.05, (2) erred in finding that Defendant failed to show good cause, and (3) erred in finding that Defendant failed to establish a meritorious defense. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).