Case ID: so2d_311/html/0177-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John R. RHODES, Appellant, v. Marion RHODES, Appellee.
    No. 73-1076.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    April 11, 1975.
    Rehearing Denied May 6, 1975.
    James P. O’Flarity and Patrick W. Gil-len, Jr., of Law Offices of James P. O’Flarity, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    R. T. Shankweiler, of Patterson, Malo-ney & Shankweiler, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs and record in this case, including the transcript of the testimony. Though the appellate questions are close, they are essentially questions of fact. The trial judge observed the witness and obviously rejected some aspects of the testimony. This is his prerogative. Accordingly, we feel obligated to affirm the order on appeal.

Affirmed.

CROSS and DOWNEY, JJ., and VANN, HAROLD R., Associate Judge, concur.