Case ID: so2d_932/html/0298-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "STRINGER, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael MORGAN, Appellant, v. Marilyn MORGAN, Appellee.
    No. 2D05-2819.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Jan. 4, 2006.
    Elisa S. Worthington of Garvin & Tripp, P.A.; and Stephen D. Thompson of Thompson & Schreiber, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellant.
    Nicole L. Goetz and Victoria M. Ho of Asbell, Ho & Klaus, P.A., Naples, for Ap-pellee.
   STRINGER, Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s order, entered on remand from the parties’ earlier appeal, which imposes a lien on a portion of Michael Morgan’s assets in favor of Marilyn Morgan as replacement security for Michael Morgan’s alimony obligation. However, we remand to the trial court to strike the finding that the security obligation can be construed as lump sum alimony because that finding is outside the scope of our earlier remand and unnecessary to the order.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded with directions.

SALCINES and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.