Case ID: sw3d_553/html/0900-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Steven MARTIN, Appellant.
    No. ED 105709
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    Filed: August 14, 2018
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Marc D. Goldstein, 7700 Forsyth Blvd., Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63105.
    ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
    Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Steven Martin appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction after a jury trial for burglary in the second degree. The evidence was sufficient and there was no other prejudicial error at trial. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).