Case ID: so2d_467/html/0434-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re the ADOPTION OF A.C.R. and C.W.R.
    No. 84-2362.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 10, 1985.
    Lee S. Damsker of Maney, Damsker & Arledge, Tampa, for appellant.
    Jack M. Larkin of Spicola & Larkin, P.A., Tampa, and Charlie Luckie, Jr., of Dayton, Sumner, Luckie & McKnight, P.A., Dade City, for appéllees.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Kenneth Bryson, appeals the trial court’s order entered in favor of appel-lees, Camille Reynolds and James Larkin Reynolds, holding that the adoption agreement entered into between the parties was valid. Contrary to appellant’s contentions, we find that there was sufficient competent evidence to support the findings of the trial court. Friedman v. U.S. Home Corp., 452 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); In re Estate of Rodgers, 149 So.2d 391 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963).

Accordingly, we affirm.

RYDER, C.J., and CAMPBELL and FRANK, JJ., concur.