Case ID: f-appx_2/html/0256-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Gerald David DAVAGE, Petitioner.
    No. 00-7639.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 11, 2001.
    Decided Jan. 19, 2001.
    Gerald David Davage, petitioner pro se.
    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Gerald David Davage, a Maryland inmate, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus requesting that this court vacate orders entered by the district court denying his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000) motion and dismissing his independent action to set aside the § 2255 judgment on the ground that the district court judge was biased against him. Davage also asks that the district court judge recuse himself from any of Davage’s future actions. Because Davage appears dissatisfied merely with the judge’s rulings in his cases and has not established any extrajudicial bias, recusal is not warranted. In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir.1987) (holding that nature of alleged bias must be personal and not arising out of litigation). Finally, we decline to vacate the judge’s prior orders because Davage appealed from those rulings, and we upheld them on appeal. See In re United Steelworkers of Am., 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.1979) (noting that mandamus may not be used as substitute for appeal). Although we grant Davage leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.