Case ID: so2d_848/html/0435-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. GREEN, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bienendido GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D02-3031.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 2, 2003.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
    Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Roberta G. Mandel, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before LEVY, GERSTEN, and GREEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Franklin, 836 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Conflict is certified with Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), rev. dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla.2002).

GREEN, J.

(specially concurring).

The doctrine of stare decisis compels me to join in the affirmance of this cause, but I continue to adhere to the view that Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), review dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla.2002), was correct in its conclusion that Chapter Law 99-188, Laws of Florida, violates the single subject rule of the Florida Constitution, accord Carlson v. State, 27 Fla. L. Weekly D2162, — So.2d -, 2002 WL 31202145 (Fla. 5th DCA Oct. 4, 2002).