Case ID: so2d_681/html/0933-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Humberto GOMEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 95-3144.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 30, 1996.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Sylvie Perez Posner, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before GERSTEN, GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing evidence of collateral sex crimes where both the charged offenses and the collateral crimes occurred in a familial setting and where the collateral crimes were sufficiently similar to the charged offenses. See Saffor v. State, 660 So.2d 668, 672 (Fla.1995); Shipman v. State, 668 So.2d 313 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Affirmed.