Case ID: sw3d_251/html/0401-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Darnell LOVE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 68174.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    May 6, 2008.
    Mark A. Grothoff, Esq., Columbia, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen. and Cory Loee Atkins, Esq., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before DIV IV: HOWARD, C.J., HARDWICK, and WELSH, JJ.
   Order

PER CURIAM.

Darnell Love appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, following an eviden-tiary hearing. For reasons explained in the Memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm the motion court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b).