Case ID: f2d_386/html/0449-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Corliss LAMONT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES and R. L. Polk & Co., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 205, Docket 31595.
    United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
    Argued Nov. 28, 1967.
    Decided Dec. 12, 1967.
    Leonard Boudin, New York City (Ra-binowitz & Boudin, Victor Rabinowitz, New York City, David Rein, Washington, D. C., and Joan Goldberg, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.
    Mortimer Sattler, New York City (Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., of the State of New York, Samuel A. Hirsho-witz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and Joel Lewittes, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee, Commissioner of Motor Vehicles.
    Wyllys S. Newcomb, New York City (Royall, Koegel, Rogers & Wells, John M. O’Hara and Guy C. Quinlan, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-ap-pellee, R. L. Polk & Co.
    Before MOORE, SMITH and HAYS, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

We affirm for substantially the reasons contained in the opinion of Judge Frankel reported at 269 F.Supp. 880 (S.D.N.Y.1967).