Case ID: so2d_351/html/1101-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. DAUKSCH, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Willie HAMPTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 76-924.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Nov. 9, 1977.
    
      Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Henry Prettyman, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert L. Bogen, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Heath, 343 So.2d 13 (Fla.1977).

ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.

DAUKSCH, J., concurs specially, with opinion.

DAUKSCH, Judge,

concurring specially:

This appeal involves the question presented in Pace v. State, 350 So.2d 1075 (Fla. 4th DCA, Opinion filed June 24, 1977), in which I dissented. See also dissent upon denial of rehearing, Opinion filed October 11, 1977. The rule is now established that the trial court may impose the restriction discussed in Pace, supra. Therefore, I concur in the result here but do not recede from my opinion in that dissent.