Case ID: a3d_205/html/0204-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the MATTER OF Christopher D. BOYMAN, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 036901987)
    D-73 September Term 2018 082327
    Supreme Court of New Jersey.
    March 27, 2019
    ORDER
   The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 18-255, recommending on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20-4(f)(default by respondent), that Christopher D. Boyman, formerly of Cranford, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, and who has been suspended from the practice of law since February 6, 2012, be disbarred for violating RPC 5.5(a)(1) and Rule 1:20-20(b)(1) (practicing law while suspended), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities);

And Christopher D. Boyman having failed to appear on the Order directing him to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Christopher D. Boyman be disbarred, effective immediately, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys;

ORDERED that Christopher D. Boyman be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing or hereinafter deposited in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by Christopher D. Boyman pursuant to Rule 1:21-6 be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause shown, and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that Christopher D. Boyman comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.