Case ID: ga-app_31/html/0184-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Luke, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

14990.
    RENEW v. THE STATE.
    The evidence authorized the verdict.
    Decided November 15, 1923.
    Indictment for manufacture of liquor; from Randolph superior court—Judge Custer presiding. July 28, 1923.
    
      Charles W. Worrill, for plaintiff in error.
    
      B. T. Gastellow, solicitor-general, B. B. Arnold, contra.
   Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition statute. The evidence was amply sufficient to authorize the conviction. Indeed, the sheriff testified that the defendant confessed his guilt; and the confession was not denied or attacked. The court, after having approved the verdict, property overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed,.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworih, J., concur.