Case ID: f2d_295/html/0038-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert P. GRAY, Leslie I. Rogers, Jennings H. Graham, Edward Y. Osborne, d/b/a Gray, Rogers, Graham and Osborne, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
    No. 17156.
    United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
    Oct. 5, 1961.
    McNealy, Merdes & Camarot, Fairbanks, Alaska, for petitioner.
    Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel for N. L. R. B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack and James A. Ryan, Attorneys for N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Charles Henderson, Atty. for N. L. R. B., Seattle, Wash., for respondent.
    Before CHAMBERS, HAMLIN and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges,
   PER CURIAM.

The case involves two temporary employees in a very small operation. We are unable to find sufficient jurisdictional basis for enforcement of the proposed order or that enforcement would effectuate the purposes of the National Labor Relations Act. Cf. N. L. R. B. v. Trama, 9 Cir., 1961, 293 F.2d 28; and N. L. R. B. v. Grunwald-Marx, Inc., 9 Cir., 290 F.2d 210.