Case ID: ohio-st-3d_55/html/0017-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n     Resnick, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Immelt.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Immelt (1990), 55 Ohio St. 3d 17.]
    (No. 90-803
    Submitted June 19, 1990
    Decided November 7, 1990.)
    
      J. Warren Bettis, disciplinary counsel, and Mark H. Aultman, for relator.
   Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record in this case, we concur in the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3), (4), and (5), and 9-102(B)(4). We also agree with the board’s recommendation. Therefore, we order that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Respondent is further ordered to show complete restitution and adequate recovery upon any application he makes for readmission to the Ohio Bar. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Resnick, J., dissents.

Resnick, J.,

dissenting. The conduct of the respondent merits his disbarment.