Case ID: f-appx_589/html/0101-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip James WILLIAMS, a/k/a D, a/k/a PJ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 14-7340.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 18, 2014.
    Decided: Dec. 23, 2014.
    Phillip James Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Phillip James Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his pro se Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion to compel a substantial assistance reduction, as well as its order denying Williams’ motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See United States v. Williams, No. 4:09-cr-00073-TLW-l (D.S.C. June 30, 2014, Aug. 18, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.