Case ID: sw2d_823/html/0068-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Stanley Wayne DERING, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. 59369.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Nov. 19, 1991.
    Joseph P. Cunningham II, Crystal City, for defendant/appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff /respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury for driving while intoxicated, § 577.-010, RSMo 1986. As it was his third DWI offense, he was sentenced by the court to three years of imprisonment with execution of sentence suspended and placed on five years probation.

The judgment is based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).