Case ID: sw2d_4/html/1115-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HAWKINS, J. MORROW, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

M. L. MOORE v. STATE.
    (No. 11753.)
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    March 21, 1928.
    Rehearing Denied April 25, 1928.
    Appeal from District Court, Eisher County; W. R. Chapman, Judge.
    
    A. A. Dawson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.
   HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; punishment being one year in the penitentiary, There being in the record neither statement of facts nor bills of exception, nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

MORROW, P. J.

The fact that the record may have been filed in this court more than 90 days after adjournment is not available as a matter of which the appellant can complain. The statement in the motion for rehearing that in the verdict questions Nos. 1 and 2 were not answered “No” is not intelligible, in the absence of some explanatory matter by way of a bill of exceptions. The verdict as found in the record seems perfectly formal. It found the appellant guilty, and assessed against him a punishment of confinement in the penitentiary for one year. The case was tried upon a plea of guilty. The motion for rehearing is overruled.