Case ID: f-appx_467/html/0792-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BOBBY R. BALDOCK, United States Circuit Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Tavis McARTHUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 09-4239.
    United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
    April 11, 2012.
    A. Bryce Dixon, Dixon, Truman, Fisher & Clifford, P.C., St. George, UT, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Stuart H. Schultz, Esq., Andrew D. Wright, Strong & Hanni, Salt Lake City, UT, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before BRISCOE, Chief Judge, BALDOCK and TYMKOYICH, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER AND JUDGMENT

BOBBY R. BALDOCK, United States Circuit Judge.

The Supreme Court of Utah in McArthur v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2012 UT 22, 274 P.3d 981 (Utah 2012), has answered the two questions we previously certified to that Court pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 27.1 and Utah R.App. P. 41. Those answers resolve this appeal as a matter of law without the need of further factual inquiry by the district court. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.