Case ID: ohio-cc-ns_9/html/0412-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DISTRIBUTION OF RENT OF DEVISED PROPERTY.
    [Circuit Court of Hamilton County.]
    Mary C. Capelle et al v. Wm. F. Wieman et al.
    Decided, March 8, 1907.
    
      Devise — Death of Life Tenant — Apportionment of Current Rents — .Executors — Equity.
    Gotten, J.; Swing, J., and Smith, J., concur.
    This action was commenced to recover $20.15 received by the defendants as rent under the following circumstances:
    Henry Wieman devised the premises to his widow, Mary Wieman, for life with remainder to plaintiffs. The rent was due and payable from one of the tenants on the 15th of each month, and from the other tenants on the 1st of each month. Mary Wieman, the life tenant, died on the 12th day of November. 1905. The monthly rent due and payable on the 15th of November and the 1st of December following was collected by the defendant, W. F. Wieman, and apportioned between the plaintiffs and the defendant, as executor of the last will and testament of Mary Wieman, deceased.
    At common law when the life tenant dies during the term, neither party could recover any portion of the rent; by statute in England and some of the states, the rent is apportioned among 'such claimants. But no such statute prevails in Ohio, and the rent having been apportioned between the plaintiffs and the defendant executor according to principles of natural justice and equity, the former were not entitled to any relief, and the judgment dismissing their petition will be affirmed. Van Hayes, Executor, v. West, 3 C. C., 64'.
    
      John B. Von 8 eg gem, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Furber & Jachson, for defendants in error.