Case ID: ga_147/html/0523-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jones v. Coolidge Banking Company.
    No. 43.
    January 16, 1918.
    Claim. Before Judge Thomas. Thomas superior court. December 3, 1916.
    
      Clifford JE. Hay, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Titus, Dekle & Hopkins, contra.
   Per Curiam.

Under the pleadings and the evidence in the case, the verdict directed by the court was the only verdict that could properly have been rendered; and there was no error in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All-the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent.