Case ID: ind_5/html/0164-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State Bank v. Vanslyke.
    ERROR to the Lawrence Circuit Court.
    
      Wednesday, May 31.
    
      G. G. Dunn, for the plaintiff.
    
      R. H. Rousseau and J. S. Watts, for the defendant.
   Per Curiam.

— Assumpsit for dividends. Plea, the general issue. Verdict for the plaintiff, and judgment, over a motion for a new trial, on the verdict.

The only real question presented to this Court is upon the weight of the evidence. It is somewhat conflicting, and was for the jury. We cannot say the Court below erred in refusing to disturb their verdict.

The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs.