Case ID: ohio-st-3d_71/html/0217-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 217.]
    (No. DD 88-30
    Submitted November 16, 1994
    Decided December 20, 1994.)
    
      
      Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
    
      Butler, Cincione, DiCuecio & Dritz and David B. Barnhart, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we concur in the findings and recommendation of the panel. B. Alan Freeman’s probation is revoked and his original six-month suspension is reinstated, but he is given credit for time served. He will not be reinstated until he pays the restitution to the Baileys in full. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Young, Resniok, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

William W. Young, J., of the Twelfth Appellate District, sitting for Wright, J.