Case ID: so2d_544/html/0413-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE ex rel. Charles MARSHALL v. CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, SECTION “J”.
    No. 89-KH-1131.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    June 5, 1989.
   In re Marshall, Charles; — Plaintiffs); applying for writ of mandamus and supervisory and/or remedial writ.; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 282-382.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he has filed. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.