Case ID: f-appx_622/html/0237-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Byron C. BRIGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee, and Raymond P. Lacey, Defendant.
    No. 15-1317.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 29, 2015.
    Decided: Nov. 12, 2015.
    Bikash Roy, Cary, North Carolina, for Appellant. Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, G. Norman Acker, III, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Byron C. Briggs appeals the ■ district court’s orders denying his motion to set aside the Government’s scope-of-employment certification, see 28 U.S.C. § 2679(b)(1), (d)(1) (2012), and granting the Government’s motion to dismiss his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Briggs v. United States, No. 5:13-cv-00844-BR, 2015 WL 72123 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 2015; Feb. 2, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.