Case ID: fla_102/html/0460-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

S. D. Creel and his wife, Oveido Creel, Appellants, vs. R. S. Abernethy, Appellee.
    
    136 So. 229.
    Division A.
    
      Opinion filed July 11, 1931.
    
      ZewadsJci & Pierce, for Appellants;
    
      Don Register, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

— The transcript of the reeord in this case has no index attached thereto, as is required by the Eules.

The assignments of error present only the question of the correctness of the findings and deeree of the chancellor based on question of fact.

There appears in the record substantial evidence to support the deeree appealed from and, therefore, such decree should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.