Case ID: ohio-st-3d_87/html/0052-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Wilkerson, Appellant, v. Mitchell, Warden, Appellee.
    [Cite as Wilkerson v. Mitchell (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 52.]
    (No. 99-1033
    Submitted September 15, 1999
    Decided October 13, 1999.)
    
      Randolph D. Wilkerson, pro se.
    
    
      Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Michele M. Schoeppe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Wilkerson’s claims challenge the validity and sufficiency of his indictment and are not cognizable in habeas corpus. See Shie v. Leonard (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 160, 161, 702 N.E.2d 419, 420. Moreover, Wilkerson’s robbery convictions were based on an indictment expressly charging him with those offenses.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.