Case ID: f-appx_294/html/0047-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gregory RICE, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. Richard BENNETT, Clerk, Defendant — Appellee.
    No. 08-7029.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 16, 2008.
    Decided: Sept. 24, 2008.
    Gregory Rice, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    
      Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Gregory Rice appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rice v. Bennett, No. 8:08-cv-01015-PJM (D. Md. filed June 2, 2008 & entered June 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.