Case ID: f-appx_592/html/0949-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SOFTVIEW LLC, Appellant v. KYOCERA CORPORATION, Motorola Mobility LLC, Appellees.
    No. 2014-1599.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    Feb. 9, 2015.
    Morgan Chu, Irell & Manella LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by Samuel Kái Lu, Alan J. Heinrich.
    Eric C. Cohen, Katten Muchin Rosen-man LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appel-lee Kyocera Corporation. Also represented by Michael Tomsa, Michael Adam Dorfman.
    John C. Alemanni, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Winston-Salem, NC, argued for appellee Motorola Mobility LLC. Also represented by Adam Howard Chames; David A. Reed, Candice C. De-caire, Alyson L. Wooten, William Henry Boice, Atlanta, GA; Christopher Schenck, Seattle, WA.
    Joseph Matal, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for interve-nor. Also represented by Scott Weidenfel-ler, Nathan K. Kelley.
    WALLACH, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.