Case ID: sw_145/html/0621-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DAVIDSON, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MARTINEZ v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    March 27, 1912.)
    Criminal Law (§ 1090) — Appeal — Motion por New Trial — Review—Absence of Evidence.
    Grounds of a motion for a new trial cannot be considered on appeal, in the absence of a statement of facts or bill of exceptions.
    TEd. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2803-2861, 2919, 3201; Dec. Dig. § 1090.]
    Appeal from District Court, Howard County; James L. Shepherd, Judge.
    Rafael Martinez was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    
      
      For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Rep’r indexes
    
   DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of burglary; his punishment being assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Tbe grounds of tbe motion for new trial cannot be considered, in tbe absence of tbe evidence.

Tbe judgment is affirmed.