Case ID: ny_168/html/0649-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The Cahill Iron Works, Respondent, v. Francis R. Pemberton, Appellant.
    
      Cahill Iron Works v. Pemberton, 48 App. Div. 468, affirmed.
    (Argued October 8, 1901;
    decided October 22, 1901.)
    Appeal from a judgment. of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 13,1900, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a hew trial.
    
      Franlt, SulUvmi Smith and G. Walter Artz for appellant.
    
      James H Oaldwell and Robert R. Reed for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Gray,Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.