Case ID: ohio-st-3d_66/html/0140-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kearns.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Kearns (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 140.]
    (No. 92-2501
    Submitted February 2, 1993
    Decided April 21, 1993.)
    
      J. Warren Bettis, Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
   Per Curiam.

Respondent has failed to show why he should not receive discipline comparable to that imposed by the Supreme Court of Colorado. Accordingly, we hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law in Ohio for the duration of his Colorado suspension. However, before respondent will be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio, he must present evidence that he has made the restitution ordered by the Colorado Supreme Court, as required by Gov. Bar R. V(10)(E)(1). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.