Case ID: so2d_458/html/1150-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas James TAYLOR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 83-2988.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 30, 1984.
    Rehearing Denied Dec. 17, 1984.
    Chaykin, Karlan & Jacobs and Sharon Jacobs, Coral Gables, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before HENDRY, BASKIN and JOR-GENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We hold that under the totality of the circumstances the identification was reliable, and there was no substantial likelihood of misidentification, even though the confrontation procedure was suggestive. We therefore affirm the judgment of conviction. Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 97 S.Ct. 2243, 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 93 S.Ct. 375, 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972); Grant v. State, 390 So.2d 341 (Fla.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 913, 101 S.Ct. 1987, 68 L.Ed.2d 303 (1981); Lecoin v. State, 418 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Affirmed.