Case ID: wash_1/html/0006-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Anders, O. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 565.
    Decided January 15, 1890.
    Coral H. Danforth v. J. Wilson Paxton.
    
      Appeal from District Court, Pierce Comity.
    
    Appellant brought suit against appellee to secure cancellation of tbe record of a deed, wrongfully procured from tbe custody of a person bolding same in escrow, and praying that tbe appellee be compelled to again place tbe deed in escrow. Appellee filed a demurrer, wbicb was overruled, and a decree, prepared by appellee, was entered in favor of appellant. Thereafter, during tbe same term, appellant moved that the decree in bis favor be set aside and vacated. This motion was denied, tbe court, however, modifying the language of tbe decree, of its own motion, and over the protest and objections of appellant. From tbe order denying said motion to vacate tbe decree, appellant brings this appeal.
    
      Lewis Cass Branson and W. 3. Pritchard, for appellant.
    
      John Arthur, for appellee.
   Anders, O. J.

For tbe reasons stated in tbe opinion of this court in tbe case of Lilienthal v. Wright, ante, p. 1, tbe appeal herein is dismissed.

Scott, Stiles and Hoyt, JJ., concur.

Dunbar, J., not sitting.