Case ID: f-appx_696/html/0624-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ABRASIVES-SOUTH INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AWUKO ABRASIVES WANDMACHER GMBH & CO KG; Wandmacher GMBH; Marty Korte, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 16-2295
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: August 16,- 2017
    Decided: August 24, 2017
    John B. Kern, JOHN B. KERN INTERNATIONAL LAW, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Russell S. Abrams, Karen E. Spain, K & L GATES LLP, Charleston, South Carolina, for Ap-pellees.
    Before TRAXLER, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Abrasives-South, Inc., which brought this action against Defendants asserting several state law claims, including claims of interference with contractual relations, fraud and deceit, and unfair trade practices claims, appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants summary judgment and denying its Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See Abrasives-South Inc. v. Awuko Abrasives Wandmacher GMBH & Co KG, No. 2:16-cv-00768-RMG (D.S.C. Aug. 17, 2016 & Oct. 4, 2016); see also Hooper v. Ebenezer Sr. Servs. & Rehab. Ctr., 386 S.C. 108, 687 S.E.2d 29, 33 (2009) (“Equitable tolling may be applied where it is justified under all the circumstances ... [but it] is a doctrine that should be used sparingly and only when the interests of justice compel its use.”). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED