Case ID: sc_20/html/0581-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "per curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 1497.
    Renneker v. Warren.
    November Term, 1883.
    
      January 16th, 1884.
   Motion refused

per curiam,

This was an application to re-instate on the docket an appeal which had been dismissed by this court. But as no notice of intention to appeal had been given to respondent or his attorney, within ten days after the rising of the court, as imperatively required by statute, (Code, §§ 348, 349,) the court has no power to remedy this omission.