Case ID: so2d_238/html/0169-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HIGH, CLARKE & FENEIS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation, Appellee.
    No. 69-1046.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 28, 1970.
    Rehearing Denied Aug. 24, 1970.
    George & McQuade, Miami, for appellant.
    Bolles, Goodwin, Ryskamp & Ware, and Robert Lane, Jr., Miami, for appellee.
    Before PEARSON, C. J., and BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The defendant counterclaimant appeals from a final judgment for the plaintiff after a jury found for the appellee upon its claim and against the appellant upon its counterclaim.

The sole point presented on appeal asserts that the instruction given by the trial court incorrectly stated the law applicable to the case. The record reveals that the judgment must be affirmed without our passing upon the sufficiency of the instruction, because appellant did not raise at the time of the charge conference the objection it urges here. Its sole objection below was so general in nature as to fail to inform the court of the objection raised here. Henningsen v. Smith, Fla.App. 1965, 174 So.2d 85, 87.

Affirmed.