Case ID: nys_122/html/1129-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GILMOUR, Respondent, v. FLATBUSH AMUSEMENT CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    May 6, 1910.)
    Action by A. Lincoln Gilmour igainst the Flatbush Amusement Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment of the Municipal 3ourt reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to ibide the event, upon the ground that the plain-:if£ has not established bj; a fair preponderance >f evidence any valid action on the part of the lirectors or stockholders of the defendant company that he should be compensated for his services, or fixing the amount of such compensaion.