Case ID: f_195/html/0069-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RAGAN, MALONE & CO. v. COTTON & PRESTON.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    April 2, 1912.)
    No. 2,153.
    Bankruptcy (§ 455)—Appealable Orders—“Judgment Granting or Denying a Discharge.”
    An order by which the findings and conclusions of á’ special master, to whom was, referred a contested application for a discharge, were affirmed, and his report “adopted as the opinion, conclusions, and judgment of the court,” is not a,“judgment granting or denying a discharge,” within Bankr. Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, § 25a (2), 30 Stat 553 (U. S. Comp. 8t. 1901, p. 3432), and is not appealable.
    [Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Bankruptcy, Cent. Dig. § 916; Dee. Dig. § 455.*
    For other definitions, see Words and Phrases, vol. 4. pp. 3827-3842; vol. 8, pp. 7695, 7696.
    Appeal and review in bankruptcy eases, see note to In re Eggert, 43 O. O. A. 9.]
    Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia.
    In the matter of Cotton & Preston, bankrupts. Ragan, Malone & Co., creditors, appeal from an order of the District Court.
    Appeal dismissed.
    
      Victor Lamar Smith, for appellants.
    L. E. Heath, for appellees.
    • Before PARDEE and McCORMICK, Circuit Judges, and MAXEY, District Judge.
    
      
      For other eases see same topic & g isumbkii in Dee. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep*r Indexes .
    
   PER CURIAM.

The record shows that the bankrupts applied for a discharge, and that certain creditors filed objections with specifications thereto; that their application was referred to a special master to hear and determine, and report his findings to the court; that the said special master made an elaborate report, concluding as follows:

“I therefore recommend that the objections filed by Ragan, Malone & Co. to the application of these bankrupts for their discharge should be overruled and dismissed.”

And exceptions were filed to the said report, upon hearing which the court passed the following order:

“After hearing the arguments of counsel, reading and considering the complete and learned report of Hon. Max Isaac, Special Master, and the exceptions thereto, and the record in the cause: It is, upon consideration, adjudged and decreed that the findings of the master are in all respects in accordance with the law, and his conclusions are affirmed, and his report is adopted as the opinion, conclusions, and judgment of the court.”

Than this the record shows no further order or decree of the court, and from the same this appeal was taken. As the order is not one granting or refusing a discharge, and is in no sense final, the appeal is. dismissed. See Walter Scott & Co. v. Wilson, 115 Fed. 284, 53 C. C. A. 76; Stratton v. Dewey, 79 Fed. 34, 24 C. C. A. 435.