Case ID: ind-app_79/html/0697-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dausman, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company v. Smith, Administratrix.
    [No. 11,261.
    Filed May 12, 1922.
    Rehearing denied November 22, 1922.]
    From Dearborn Circuit Court; Charles A. Lowe, Judge.
    Action by Susie E. Smith, administratrix, against the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    
      Frank L. Littleton, T. S. Cravens and Forrest Chenoweth, for appellant.
    
      Estel G. Bielby and Richard L. Ewbank, for appellee
   Dausman, C. J.

This is á second appeal. Smith, Admx., v. Cleveland, etc., R. Co. (1917), 67 Ind. App. 397, 117 N. E. 534. The only alleged error presented, which has not been settled by the law of the case as announced in the opinion in the former appeal, is the ruling on the motion for a new trial. We have carefully considered the instructions given and those refused, and we find no reversible error in that regard. We have examined the evidence, and we find that it tends fairly to sustain the verdict in every essential feature.

The judgment is affirmed.