Case ID: nj-eq_107/html/0597-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Howard Lee Danenhauer, respondent, v. George Edward Danenhauer et al., appellants.
    [Decided February 2d, 1931.]
    
      Mr. Samuel Morris, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. Isadore Sacies, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, and reported in 105 N. J. Eq. 449.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Campbell, Bodine, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Lloyd, Case, Daly, Wells, JJ. 4.