Case ID: so2d_505/html/0010-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. ANSTEAD, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George L. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. John Douglas WILSHUSEN, an individual, John H. Wilshusen Trust a/k/a John H. Wilshusen Trust No. 1 and No. 3, John H. Wilshusen, an individual, and Robert A. Sullivan, an individual, Appellees.
    No. 4-86-2426.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    March 25, 1987.
    Rehearing Denied April 13, 1987.
    Jeffrey C. Roth of Jeffrey C. Roth, P.A., Coral Gables, for appellant.
    J. Doug Wilshusen, as one of the Trustees of the John H. Wilshusen Trust No. 1 and No. 3, Spring, Tex., pro se appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., dissents with opinion.

ANSTEAD, Judge,

dissenting.

This is an appeal from an order granting a motion to quash service of process upon the appellee trustee, a resident of Texas. The only ground set out in the trustee’s motion to quash is that the complaint “fails to allege a basis for jurisdiction” as to the trustee. I believe the complaint more than adequately sets out a basis for jurisdiction against the trustee, including detailed allegations as to his residence in Texas, his execution of a loan agreement, his default under the loan agreement, the pledge of trust-owned stock under the loan agreement, as well as attaching executed copies of the written loan agreement and the stock certificates. For that reason I would reverse the trial court’s order.