Case ID: f-appx_119/html/0502-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re: Christopher Lee NEAL, Petitioner.
    No. 04-7339.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 10, 2004.
    Decided: Jan. 12, 2005.
    Christopher Lee Neal, Petitioner pro se.
    Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Christopher Lee Neal petitions for a writ of error coram nobis pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2000), alleging this Court erred in affirming his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (2000). Although we grant Neal leave to file supplemental material and to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we deny the petition because coram nobis relief is not available or appropriate in this case. See United States v. Addonizio, 442 U.S. 178, 186, 99 S.Ct. 2235, 60 L.Ed.2d 805 (1979); United States v. Mandel, 862 F.2d 1067, 1075 (4th Cir.1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED