Case ID: ne2d_894/html/0529-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Randall J. KNUTH, Respondent.
    No. 98S00-0803-DI-150.
    Supreme Court of Indiana.
    June 3, 2008.
   ORDER IMPOSING RECIPROCAL DISCIPLINE

The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission filed a “Verified Notice of Foreign Discipline and Petition for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause,” advising that Respondent was disciplined by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USP-TO”) and requesting, pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23(28), that reciprocal discipline be imposed in this state. On April 1, 2008, this Court issued an “Order to Show Cause,” to which Respondent has not responded. This case is now before this Court for final resolution.

Respondent was admitted to practice law in Indiana in 1991. On February 21, 2008, the USPTO found Respondent’s conduct violated the USPTO’s Code of Professional Responsibility. For this misconduct, Respondent was suspended from the practice of law before the USPTO for three years.

The Court finds that there has been no showing, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23(28)(c), of any reason why reciprocal discipline should not issue in this state.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in this state immediately. Respondent is ordered to fulfill the duties of a suspended attorney under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(26). Respondent shall not be eligible to petition for reinstatement in this state pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23(4) until reinstated to the practice of law before the USPTO or until further order of this Court.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward notice of this Order to Respondent or Respondent’s attorney, to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, to the USPTO, and to all other entities entitled to notice under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(3)(d), governing suspension.

All Justices concur.