Case ID: ne3d_95/html/0072-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "All Justices concur.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the MATTER OF: Andrew C. EGGERS, Respondent
    Supreme Court Case No. 18S-DI-188
    Supreme Court of Indiana.
    Filed April 24, 2018
    Published Order Approving Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline
    Pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23 (12.1)(b), the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and Respondent have submitted for approval a "Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline" stipulating agreed facts and proposed discipline as summarized below.
    Stipulated Facts: Based on an incident on March 26, 2017, Respondent pled guilty to operating a vehicle with a BAC of .08 or more, a class C misdemeanor. At the time of his arrest, he was a deputy prosecutor for Johnson County.
    The parties cite no facts in aggravation. The parties cite the following facts in mitigation: (1) Respondent has no disciplinary history; (2) Respondent's misconduct was not due to a dishonest or selfish motive; and (3) Respondent has cooperated with the disciplinary process.
    Violation: The parties agree that Respondent violated Indiana Professional Conduct Rule 8.4(d), which prohibits engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.
    Discipline: The parties propose the appropriate discipline is a public reprimand. The Court, having considered the submissions of the parties, now approves the agreed discipline and imposes a public reprimand for Respondent's misconduct.
    The costs of this proceeding are assessed against Respondent.
   All Justices concur.