Case ID: a2d_993/html/0869-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Darryl HAWKINS, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Respondents.
    No. 183 EM 2009.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    April 19, 2010.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 19th day of April, 2010, the “Petition for Leave to File Notice of Appeal and Jurisdictional Statement Nunc Pro Tunc,” which is treated as a Petition for Relief per Pa.R.A.P. 123, is DENIED.