Case ID: ohio-st-3d_89/html/0079-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dayton Bar Association v. Susco.
    [Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Susco (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 79.]
    (No. 99-2263
    Submitted February 9, 2000
    Decided May 24, 2000.)
    
      
      David P. Williamson, for relator.
    
      Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter and Geoffrey Stem, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.