Case ID: f-appx_648/html/0737-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Norma J. WINGATE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Megan J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General of the United States, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 13-17266.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted April 13, 2016.
    
    Filed April 19, 2016.
    Norma J. Wingate, San Francisco, CA, pro se.
    Rebecca Ann Falk, U.S. Department of Justice, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before: FARRIS, TALLMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2), Megan J. Brennan is substituted for her predecessor, Patrick R. Donahoe, as Postmaster General.
    
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Norma J. Wingate appeals pro se from the district court’s order in her employment action alleging discrimination in violation of Title VIL We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir.2010). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Wingate’s Title VII discrimination claims because Wingate failed to allege facts sufficient to show that the alleged conduct was due to any of her protected classes. See id. at 341-42 (though' pro se pleadings are liberally construed, plaintiff must allege sufficient facts to state a plausible claim); Leong v. Potter, 347 F.3d 1117, 1124 (9th Cir.2003) (elements of Title VII employment discrimination claim).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       xhis disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.