Case ID: okla_131/html/0162-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GOODMAN v. SKLAR.
    No. 18222.
    Opinion Filed June 5, 1928.
    (Syllabus.)
    Appeal and Error — Reversal in Absence of Answer Brief.
    The syllabus in the case of City National Bank v. Coatney, 122 Okla. 233, 253 Pac. 481, is hereby adopted as the syllabus in this case.
    Error from District Court, Osage County; Jesse J. Worten, Judge.
    Action by Samuel B. Sklar against Goldie Sklar Goodman. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
    Reversed and remanded.
    Preston A. Shinn, for plaintiff in error.
    John L. Arrington, for defendant in error.
   PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Osage county, wherein the defendant in error was plaintiff.

Plaintiff in error in due time served and filed her brief in full compliance with the rules of this court, but the defendant in error has wholly failed to file any brief, pleading, or otherwise appear in this court upon the merits of the case, nor has he offered any excuse for his failure to do so.

‘‘Where plaintiff in error has served and filed its brief in compliance with the rules of this court, and the defendant in error has neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse for his failure to do so, this court is not required to search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment of the trial court may be sustained, but may, where the authorities cited in the brief filed, appear reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, reverse the cause, with directions, in accordance with the prayer of the petition in error.” City National Bank v. Coatney et al., 122 Okla. 233, 253 Pac. 481; Harbour-Longmire Furniture Co. v. Kennedy Mercantile Co., 108 Okla. 267, 236 Pac. 409; Ahfonoke v. Bullett, 114 Okla. 243, 246 Pac. 385.

In this ease the petition in error prays that the judgment of the trial court be reversed and set aside, and we find, upon examination of the authorities cited by plaintiff in error, they reasonably support her contention, and we therefore reverse the judgment of the lower court and direct it to vacate its former judgment in said cause.