Case ID: sw3d_216/html/0694-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edward MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 65309.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Feb. 27, 2007.
    Jeannie M. Willibey, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    
      Before SMART, P.J., SMITH and HARDWICK, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Edward Mitchell appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).