Case ID: ohio-st-3d_69/html/1206-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Douglas, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Schwartz, Appellant, v. Comcorp, Inc., d.b.a. Sun Newspapers, et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as Schwartz v. Comcorp, Inc. (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 1206.]
    (No. 93-588
    Submitted March 30, 1994
    Decided May 4, 1994.)
    
      Kramer & Tobocman Co., L.P.A, and Suzanne M. Nigro; Friedman & Gilbert and Terry Gilbert, for appellant.
    
      Duvin, Cohn, Barnard & Messerman, Andrew C. Meyer and Robert M. Wolff, for appellees.
    
      Spater, Gittes, Schulte & Kolman and Frederick M. Gittes; Louis A Jacobs; and William Johnson, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Employment Lawyers Association.
   The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.

AW. Sweeney, Douglas and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Douglas, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the court of appeals on the election-of-remedy issue but affirm the court of appeals on the merit issue of alleged age discrimination. There is no age discrimination in this case and appellees are entitled to have a final judgment from this court on this issue.

AW. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.