Case ID: njl_106/html/0596-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

AMELIA SANTOS, EXECUTRIX, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. ELIZABETH ANDERSON ET AL., APPELLANTS.
    Submitted October 26, 1928
    Decided May 20, 1929.
    For the respondent, Irving Siegler.
    
    For the appellants, Michael J. Bruder.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Campbell, White, Yan Buskirk, McGlennon, Kats, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.