Case ID: nj-eq_105/html/0250-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lauretta V. O’Brien, appellant, v. Thomas M. O’Brien, respondent.
    [Decided October 14th, 1929.]
    
      Messrs. Wall, Haight, Carey & Hartpence, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. L. Edward Herrman, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Rallón, and reported in 103 N. J. Eg. 214.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ.. 15.

For reversal — Done.