Case ID: colo_78/html/0198-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Adams", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 11,372.
    In re Fushimi.
    Decided October 19, 1925.
    Rehearing denied November 10, 1925.
    On motion to discharge writ of habeas corpus.
    
      Motion Sustained.
    
    1. Adjudicated Cases — Habeas Corpus. This case ruled by the opinion in In re Arahawa, 78 Colo. 193.
    
      Original Proceeding.
    
    Messrs. Allen, Webster & Drath, for petitioner.
    Mr. Donald McCreery, Mr. Hubert D. Waldo, Jr., Mr. J. Paul Hill, for respondent.
    
      En banc.
    
   Mr. Justice Adams

delivered the opinion of the court.

On application for rule to discharge writ of habeas corpus.

Petitioner was a defendant appearing in an action in the district court of Weld county, entitled: “The CoOperative Farmers’ Exchange, Inc. v. Honda, et al”. That court is vested with jurisdiction over the person of the defendant and the subject of the action. An original writ of habeas corpus was issued out of this court upon behalf of the petitioner, and upon his ex parte application, directed to the sheriff and acting jailer of Weld county. Respondent answered and moves to discharge the writ.

Except as to the name of the applicant for the writ, the facts are the same as in case No. 11,371, In the Matter of the Application of J. Arakawa for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 78 Colo. 193, 240 Pac. 940, decided by us on this day. That opinion applies to this case also and a like order will be entered. The writ is therefore discharged, with directions that the petitioner, Frank Fushimi, be remanded to the custody of the respondent as sheriff of Weld county and as jailer thereof, with permission to the petitioner to make such application and to take such further proceedings in the district court of Weld county as he may be advised, in the case there pending.

Mr. Justice Sheafor not participating.