Case ID: nys_47/html/1147-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RHODES, Respondent, v. CLARK et al., Defendants (RUSSELL, Appellant).
    (City Court of New York, General Term.
    October 26, 1897.)
    Action by Benjamin T. Rhodes, Jr., against Milton Clark and others and Charles T. Russell.
    Hoadly, Lauterbach & Johnson, for appellant.
    Cantor & Van Schaick, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The notice of dishonor sent to the appellant was sufficient. It was only necessary to notify him of the fact of the nonpayment of the notes in suit within a reasonable time after the nonpayment. Such notice was certainly given in this instance. The evidence certainly sustains the verdict, and, in our opinion, preponderates in plaintiff’s favor; and therefore the judgment is affirmed, with costs.