Case ID: ga-app_30/html/0619-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, O. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

14664.
    Hill v. The State.
    Decided July 10, 1923.
   Broyles, O. J.

The testimony of the accomplice was sufficiently corroborated by the other facts and circumstance’s of the case; the verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial requires a reversal of the judgment below.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodioorth, JJ., concur.

Indictment for making liquor; from Whitfield superior court — Judge Tarver. May 9, 1923.

M. B. Eubanks, for plaintiff in error.

J. M. Lang, solicitor-general, contra.