Case ID: so2d_613/html/0614-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joey MORVIANI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-00318.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Feb. 24, 1993.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Tonja R. Vickers, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anne Y. Swing, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Joey Morviani appeals a sentence imposed after multiple violations of probation. We affirm the sentence on the basis of Manuel v. State, 582 So.2d 823 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). In Manuel we held that “bumping” a guideline sentence one cell for violation of probation, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(14), necessarily raises the “permitted range” by one cell also. Contrary to the position taken by Morviani in this appeal, we do not believe that Manuel is inconsistent with Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273 (Fla.1992).

Affirmed.

FRANK, A.C.J., and HALL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.