Case ID: so3d_174/html/0550-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DAMOORGIAN, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as trustee for J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2007-CH1, Asset Backed Pass through Certificates, Series 2007 CH1, Appellant, v. Janet STONE and Robert Stone, Appellees.
    No. 4D14-2514.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Aug. 26, 2015.
    William L. Grimsley, of McGlinchey Stafford, Jacksonville, and N. Mark New II and Jennifer M. Chapkin of McGlinchey Stafford, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    Jerome L. Tepps, Sunrise, and Jordan L. Rappaport of Rappaport Osborne Rap-paport & Kiem, PL., Boca Raton, for ap-pellees.
   On Confession of Error

DAMOORGIAN, J.

Appellant, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“Deutsche”), appeals the trial court’s order involuntarily dismissing its foreclosure action before the close of its case-in-chief. Appellees concede, and we agree, that the trial court reversibly erred in involuntarily dismissing the foreclosure action before Deutsche rested its case. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.420(b) (providing that in bench trials, “[a]fter a party seeking affirmative relief ... has completed the presentation of evidence, any other party may move for a dismissal on the ground that on the facts and the law the party seeking affirmative relief has shown no right to relief .... ”); see also Wachovia Mortg., FSB v. Montes, 156 So.3d 1105, 1106 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (agreeing with other Florida courts that “pursuant to rule 1.420(b), a trial court may not order an involuntary dismissal of a case before a plaintiff rests its case.”).

This error was compounded by the fact that the trial court based its decision to involuntarily dismiss the foreclosure action on its incorrect ruling regarding the admissibility of the notice of default letter. See Haskin v. Haskin, 677 So.2d 376, 377 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (holding that in considering a motion for involuntary dismissal, a trial court judge may not weigh the evidence). Based on the trial testimony of Deutsche’s witness, the notice of default letter should have been admitted under the business records hearsay exception pursuant to our holding in Bank of New York v. Calloway, 157 So.3d 1064, 1069-72 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). We therefore reverse and remand for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.