Case ID: ad_173/html/0950-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Wachtel-Schuh Horse Company, Appellant, v. Hamilton Trust Company, Respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Rich, J., concurred upon the ground that the finding in the action by Cyrus Rheims," in which the parties to this action were defendants, involving the right to the deposits with interest, and in which the rate of interest was adjudicated as being two per centum per annum, is the law of this case, and res adjudieata. 
      
      
         See Rheims y. Bracken-McAveney Co. (151 App. Div. 14).—[Rep.