Case ID: nj-eq_102/html/0329-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael Larkin et al., respondents, v. Rudolph A. Koether, appellant.
    [Decided February 6th, 1928.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.
    
      Messrs. Lum, Tamblyn & Golyer, for the respondents.
    
      Mr. Frank F. Bradner, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Chaneellor Berry, and reported in 101 N. J. Fq. 116.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Yan Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

For modification — White, J. 1.