Case ID: f_137/html/1020-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BRADFORD, District Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

TRAVELERS INS. CO. OF HARTFORD v. BLACK.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
    May 17, 1905.)
    No. 6.
    In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
    George-M.' Hosack, for plaintiff in error.
    A. T. Black, for defendant in error.
    Before DALLAS and GRAY, Circuit Judges, and BRADFORD, District Judge.
   BRADFORD, District Judge.

The questions now raised fairly come within the decision of this court on a former writ of error in this ease. Black v. Travelers’ Ins. Co., 121 Fed. 732, 58 C. C. A. 14, 61 L. R. A. 500. We do not feel disposed to depart from the principles there laid down; and in accordance with them the judgment below must be and is affirmed, with costs.