Case ID: ny-super-ct_54/html/0558-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John Brooks Leavitt, Respondent, v. Lewis S. Chase, Appellant.
    Decided March 14, 1887.
    Appeal by defendant from order denying defendant’s motion for a further bill of particulars. Edwin R. Leavitt, for appellant. Austin G. Fox, for respondent.
    Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Truax, J.
   Per Curiam.

‘‘ The motion was made before answer served. The learned judge was right in denying the motion. It did not appear that an additional bill of particulars was necessary to defendant, to enable him to answer the complaint. Order affirmed, with $10 costs.”