Case ID: p2d_607/html/0843-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM: HALL, Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Glade FAATZ, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Warren L. FORSYTHE and Ameriwest, Defendant and Appellant.
    No. 16379.
    Supreme Court of Utah.
    Feb. 27, 1980.
    K. L. Mclff of Jackson, Mclff & Mower, Richfield, for defendant and appellant.
    Tex R. Olsen of Olsen & Chamberlain, Richfield, for plaintiff and respondent.
   PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from that portion of a judgment of the District Court, Sevier County, which awarded plaintiff $755.25. A recitation of the facts would not be illuminating. The sole contention on appeal, in essence, relates to plaintiff’s claim that the findings are not supported by the evidence. We disagree. A review of the record shows that these findings and, hence, the judgment are supported by credible, substantial evidence.

Affirmed. Costs to plaintiffs.

HALL, Justice

(dissenting):

The ruling of the trial court is necessarily based upon inadmissible parol evidence offered for the purpose of varying the terms of the unambiguous contract of the parties.

I would reverse.