Case ID: wash_53/html/0583-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 7958.
    Decided June 15, 1909.]
    Maria Masoero, Respondent, v. J. A. Campbell & Company et al., Appellants.
      
    
    Appeal — Review—Dismissal—Cessation op Controversy. The dismissal of an appeal carries with it the supersedeas granted therein; and hence an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate the supersedeas will he dismissed, as the controversy has ceased.
    Appeal from an order of the superior court for King ■ county, Morris, J., entered March 6, 1909, denying a motion to vacate a supersedeas or restraining order, after a hearing before the court.
    Dismissed.
    
      Walter A. Keene (Hastings &; Stedman, of counsel), for appellants.
    
      McBurney $ Cummings, for respondent.
    
      
      Reported in 102 Pac. 423.
    
   Per Curiam.

An appeal prosecuted in this action from an order denying a temporary injunction was heretofore dismissed by this court. Masoero v. Campbell Co., 52 Wash. 551, 100 Pac. 1024. After the last-mentioned appeal was taken, the trial court granted a restraining order in the nature of a supersedeas to preserve the fruits of the litigation pending the appeal. The present appeal is prosecuted from an order denying a motion to vacate the supersedeas or restraining order. Inasmuch as the dismissal of the first appeal carried with it the order from which the present appeal is prosecuted, there is no question before us for review, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.