Case ID: f-appx_710/html/0160-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frederick BANKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Donald J. TRUMP; Ivanka Trump; Jeff Sessions; Steve Bannon; Paul Ryan; Mitch McConnell; Nancy Pelosi; Charles Schumer; Dr. Cahill; Dr. Allissa Marquez; Dr. Logan Graddy; Dr. Heather Ross; Dr. Robert Wettstein; Judge Mark Hornak; Robert Cessar; Adrian Roe; Christopher Asher Wray; Scott Smith; Robert Werner; Sean Langford; Felicia Langford; Joy Flowers Conti; Nora Fischer; Cathy Bissoon; Mike Pompeo; Central Intelligence Agency; Governor of North Carolina; Governor of Pennsylvania; Mike Pence; Supreme Court of the United States; John Roberts; US Marshal Service; United States of America, Respondents-Appellees.
    
      No. 17-7368
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: January 30, 2018
    Decided: February 2, 2018
    Frederick Hamilton Banks, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Banks challenges the district court’s order dismissing' — under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012) — what it construed to be an action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). The district court also recognized that to the extent Banks sought release from custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012), Banks failed to exhaust his available remedies. Banks challenges on appeal only the district court’s exhaustion holding, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), which we conclude is correct. Accordingly, we grant Banks’ application to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm. See Banks v. Trump, No. 5:17-ct-03060-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 27, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED