Case ID: f2d_367/html/0579-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ulrich OTTEN, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
    No. 23261.
    United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
    Oct. 27, 1966.
    
      Mitchell S. Rosenheim, San Antonio, Tex., for petitioner.
    John C. Ciolino, Asst. U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., Paul Arthur Nejelski, Atty., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Louis C. Lacour, U. S. Atty., E. D. Louisiana, New Orleans, La., for respondent. Maurice A. Roberts, Atty., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., of counsel.
    Before JONES and DYER, Circuit Judges, and SPEARS, District Judge.
   PER CURIAM:

A review of the entire record discloses that there is substantial evidence in support of the administrative decision, and that the record is free from prejudicial error. No abuse of discretion is made to appear. The administrative order of deportation is

Affirmed.