Case ID: sw3d_497/html/0353-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN the INTEREST OF: M.M.L., A Minor.
    No. ED 103963
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District. Division Four.
    Filed: August 30, 2016
    
      Christopher M. Braeske, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Chimene Y. Laskley, Atty. for Juvenile Officer, Clayton, MO, Crista L. Chenow-eth-Beracha, Guardian Ad Litem, Brent-wood, MO, Richard J. Childress, Atty. for MO Dept, of Soc. Serv., St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
    Before James M. Dowd, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

J.N.L. (“Mother”) appeals the juvenile court’s judgment terminating her parental rights to her son, M.M.L. (“Child”). Mother raises two points on appeal: 1) there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s finding that Mother neglected Child; and 2) there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s finding that termination of Mother’s parental rights was in the best interest of Child. Finding that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, we affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for then-information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).