Case ID: sw_158/html/0812-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DAVIDSON, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BROWN v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    June 27, 1913.)
    Criminal Law (§ 1090*) — Appeal — Statement op Facts — Bill op Exceptions — Review.
    In the absence of a statement of facts or bill of exceptions, the denial of a motion for new trial for want of evidence to support a conviction cannot be revised on appeal.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2653, 2789, 2803-2822, 2825-2827, 2927, 2928, 2948, 3204; Dec. Dig. § 1090.*]
    Appeal from Dallas County Court at Law; W. F. Whitehurst, Judge.
    D. M. Brown was convicted of crime, and be appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for tbe State,
   DAVIDSON, P. J.

This record is before us without any statement of facts or bill of exceptions. Tbe case was submitted to tbe court; a jury being waived by appellant. Tbe only ground of the motion for new trial is tbe want of sufficient evidence to support tbe judgment. There is nothing in this to revise.

Tbe judgment will therefore be affirmed.