Case ID: f-appx_17/html/0707-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Paul William JENSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gray DAVIS, Governor; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 01-15402.
    D.C. No. CV-97-06181-REC.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 13, 2001.
    
    Decided Aug. 30, 2001.
    
      Before HAWKINS, TASHIMA, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       Gray Davis, Governor of the State of California, is substituted for his predecessor, Pete Wilson. See Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).
    
    
      
       Because the panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument, see Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2), Jensen’s request for oral argument is denied.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Paul William Jensen, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that he received inadequate medical treatment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s summary judgment, Kohler v. Inter-Tel Techs., 244 F.3d 1167, 1171 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm.

Summary judgment was proper because Jensen failed to create a genuine issue of material fact that Dr. Hiebert acted in deliberate indifference to his medical needs, see Sanchez v. Vild, 891 F.2d 240, 242 (9th Cir.1989); and failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact as to the personal involvement of the remaining defendants in the alleged violations, see Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir. 1989).

All outstanding motions are denied.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.