Case ID: so2d_357/html/0783-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MID-OSCEOLA UTILITIES, INC., Appellant, v. CITICORP BUSINESS CREDIT, INC., Appellee.
    No. 77-950.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 25, 1978.
    
      Corlett, Merritt, Killian & Sikes and Gerald E. Rosser, Miami, for appellant.
    Smathers & Thompson and Hugh J. Turner, Jr., Miami, for appellee.
    Before HUBBART and KEHOE, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

The summary judgment appealed from is affirmed, on the ground that the trial court correctly held the appellee’s security interest was superior to that of the appellant. See: Nasco Equipment Co. v. Mason, 291 N.C. 145, 229 S.E.2d 278, 284-285 (1976).