Case ID: nj-eq_15/html/0503-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hiram Van Duyne, appellant, and James M. Van Duyne, respondent.
    [Decided at November Term, 1863.]
    This case is reported in Chancery, in 1 McCarter 397.
    The court having in that cause decreed, among other things, that the appellant was “ not entitled to the use of, or any title, interest, or estate in the lands mentioned and described in the second and third clauses of the said will of Martin J. Van Duyne, or in any part thereof, by virtue of any devise made to him, or to or for his use, in and by the said second or third clause of said will.”
    The appellant appealed from that part of the Chancellor’s decree.
    
      Vanatta, for appellant.
    
      Chandler and Bradley, for respondent.
   The part of the Chancellor’s decree appealed from was reversed by the following vote :

For affirmance—Judges Elmer and Vredenburgh—2.

For reversal—Judges Cornelison, Fort, Haines, Kennedy, Ogden, Van Dyke, Whelpley—7.