Case ID: pa-super_206/html/0013-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Commonwealth v. Zeid, Appellant.
    
      Argued April 14,1965.
    Before Ervin, P. J., Wright, Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, and Hoeeman, JJ. (Flood, J., absent).
    
      June 17, 1965:
    
      John N. Scales, with him Clarence F. McBride, Caram J. Ahood, and Scales and Shaw, for appellant.
    
      W. Louis Coppersmith, Assistant District Attorney, with him Ferdinand F. Fionas, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
   Opinion

Per Curiam,

The judgment of sentence is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Griffith, as reported in 36 Pa. D. & C. 2d 101, and the appellant-defendant is directed to appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence, or any part of which had not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas.