Case ID: f-appx_77/html/0677-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Donald SULLIVAN, Mr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 03-1688.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 9, 2003.
    Decided Oct. 14, 2003.
    Donald Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    
      Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Donald Sullivan appeals the district court’s order dismissing, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Sullivan’s complaint seeking declaratory judgment that the Environmental Protection Agency does not have jurisdiction over his property pursuant to the Clean Water Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sullivan v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, No. CA-02-187-F1-7 (E.D.N.C. May 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.