Case ID: sw3d_559/html/0115-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Jonathan Rommel RICE, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 105719
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    Filed: October 16, 2018
    Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Plaintiff/Respondent.
    Carol D. Jansen, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, For Defendant/Appellant.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Jonathan Rommel Rice appeals from the trial court's judgment entered after a jury trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing a request for adjournment. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).