Case ID: f-appx_117/html/0265-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alan Douglas RAMSAY, Plaintiff— Appellant, v. The HOME DEPOT, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 04-1816.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 30, 2004.
    Decided Dec. 22, 2004.
    David M. Kopstein, Dross, Levenstein, Perilman & Kopstein, Seabrook, Maryland, for Appellant. Matthew T. Angotti, Edwin L. Keating, Anderson, Coe & King, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM.

Alan Douglas Ramsay appeals the district court’s orders granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum opinion. See Ramsay v. Home Depot, Inc., No. CA-03-1504-AMD (D. Md. May 27, 2004; June 5, 2004)(paperless order denying reconsideration). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED