Case ID: ga-app_29/html/0047-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

13707.
    Sewell v. The State.
    Decided July 25, 1922.
    Indictment for manufacture of liquor; from Haralson superior court—-Judge Irwin. May 5, 1922.
    
      Griffith & Matthews, for plaintiff in error.
    
      J. R. Hutcheson,- solicitor-general, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

There is no merit in the only special ground of the motion for a new trial. There is some evidence to support the verdict, which is approved by the judge who tried the case. “ Whenever there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has been approved by the trial judge, this court is absolutely without authority to • control the judgment of the trial court.” Owens v. State, 27 Ga. App. 322 (108 S. E. 208).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.