Case ID: njl_90/html/0703-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LONG DOCK COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT, ETC., RESPONDENT.
    Argued March 13, 1917
    Decided May 24, 1917.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 89 N. J. L, 108.
    (In re reassessments on second-class properly for 1914.)
    For the appellant, Collins & Corbin.
    
    For the respondent, John W. Wescott, attorney-general, John Bentley and John R. Hardin.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam in Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, &c., No. 48 of the present term of 'this court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, 'Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Black, 'White, PIeppeni-ietmer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal—None.