Case ID: f-appx_37/html/0074-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Derek Marquis FLEMING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Keith E. OLSON, Warden, F.C.I. Beckley, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 02-6307.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted May 30, 2002.
    Decided June 6, 2002.
    Derek Marquis Fleming, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Derek Marquis Fleming appeals the district court’s orders (1) denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6), to vacate the court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fleming v. Ol son, No. CA-97-660-5 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 4, 2002; Jan. 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.