Case ID: so3d_77/html/1195-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MAIN, Justice. MURDOCK, Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte B.V. and D.V. (In re B.V. and D.V. v. Wanda Davidson, Karen Marks, and Clay Brannon).
    1091632.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Aug. 19, 2011.
    
      Robert D. Drummond, Jr., Fairhope, for petitioners.
    Keith S. Miller of Wilkerson & Bryan, P.C., Montgomery, for respondent Clay Brannon; W. Gregory Ward, Lanett, for respondent Karen Marks; and Jackson B. Harrison of The Harrison Firm, Montgomery, for respondent Wanda Davidson.
    Troy King, atty. gen., and Corey L. Maze and James E. Long, deputy attys. gen., and William G. Parker, Jr., asst. atty. gen., for amicus curiae State ex rel. Attorney General Troy King, in support of the respondents.
   MAIN, Justice.

WRIT QUASHED. NO OPINION.

MALONE, C.J., and WOODALL, STUART, BOLIN, PARKER, and SHAW, JJ., concur.

MURDOCK and WISE, JJ., concur specially.

MURDOCK, Justice

(concurring specially).

I was shocked and saddened by the apparently callous and cruel manner (whether or not done on advice of counsel) in which the 18-year-old mentally retarded child in this case was so suddenly taken from the only parents he had ever known, parents who had raised him for almost his entire life. I therefore voted to grant certiorari review in this case. In them brief to this Court, however, the petitioners failed to address legal authority relevant to the issues whether this Court should apply the tort of outrage to conduct of this nature and whether this conduct fell within the protection afforded by the doctrine of state-agent immunity. Accordingly, I concur in the action of the Court today in quashing the writ.

WISE, J., concurs.