Case ID: f-appx_474/html/0391-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jewel D. HILL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, and their agents, representatives, attorneys, et al., Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 12-1380.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 19, 2012.
    Decided: July 23, 2012.
    Jewel D. Hill, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jewel D. Hill appeals the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice her civil suit for damages relating to an automobile accident and denying her motions to certify constitutional questions to the United States and Virginia Attorneys General and for judicial recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hill v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., No. 3:12-cv-00130-HEH (E.D. Va. Feb. 23 & Feb. 24, 2012). We deny Hill’s motions for a transcript at Government expense and to certify questions to the United States and Virginia Attorneys General. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.