Case ID: f-appx_203/html/0458-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick Lewis RUDD, a/k/a One-Eyed Louie, a/k/a Louie, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-7040.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 17, 2006.
    Decided: Oct. 20, 2006.
    Patrick Lewis Rudd, Appellant Pro Se. J. Frank Bradsher, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Patrick Lewis Rudd appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to reinstate the appeal period. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rudd, No. 7:97-er00063-H-3 (E.D.N.C. filed May 13, 2006; entered May 19, 2006 & filed May 15, 2006; entered May 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.