Case ID: so2d_959/html/0438-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "THOMPSON, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jorge L. HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 5D06-1488.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    July 13, 2007.
    James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Tomislav D. Golik, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
    
      Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
   THOMPSON, J.

AFFIRMED. See Robinson v. State, 32 Fla. L. Weekly D1245, — So.2d -, 2007 WL 1372658 (Fla. 5th DCA May 11, 2007) (“[T]o be preserved for appeal, the specific legal ground upon which a claim is based must be raised at trial and a claim different than that will not be heard on appeal.”); Huck v. State, 881 So.2d 1137, 1144-45 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (affirming where defendant’s purportedly reasonable, uncontroverted hypotheses of innocence were unreasonable and conflicted with evidence presented by State).

SAWAYA and PLEUS, JJ., concur.