Case ID: pa-super_159/html/0362-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Aenold, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Supler, Appellant, v. Sonntag.
    Argued April 16, 1916.
    Before Baldeige, P. J., Rhodes, Hiet, Reno, Ditheich, Ross and Aenold, JJ.
    
      George Bloom, with bim Bloom & Bloom, for appellant.
    
      Samuel Goldfarb, for appellee.
    July 19, 1946:
   Opinion by

Aenold, J.,

In this case tbe essential facts are substantially tbe same as in Powell v. Sonntag, 159 Pa. Superior Ct. 354, 48 A. 2d 462. Tbe testimony in each case, before tbe referee, was also offered in tbe companion case.

For the reasons given in Powell v. Sonntag, supra, the order granting rehearing is reversed.

Rhodes, J., dissents.