Case ID: gibb-surr_2/html/0446-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Sileman, S.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Estate of Emma E. Wolfe, Deceased.
    
      (Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County,
    
    
      Filed April, 1898.)
    Transfer Tax — Foreign Corporations.
    A foreign corporation, although authorized by chapter 557, Laws of 1893, to take and hold property in this State subject to the restrictions and limitations of existing laws, is, in the absence of, any statutory exemption, liable to taxation on a legacy to it.
    'Appeal from a decree assessing transfer tax.
    Joseph W. Middlebrook, for State Comptroller, appellant; E. S. Clinch, for American Baptist Publication Society, respondent.
   Sileman, S.

This is an appeal from a decree assessing the transfer tax upon the succession to the estate of Emma E. Wolfe. .The decedent died January 8, 1894, and the succession is taxable under chapter 399 of the Laws of 1892. The ground of the appeal is that the decree fails to assess a. tax against the legacy to which the respondent succeeds. I think the appeal must prevail. I am unable to distinguish this case from that of Matter of Prime, 136 N. Y. 349, in which the court said, in referring to a foreign corporation: It is obvious that the corporations now claiming exception from the legacy tax must be able to point to some statute of this State antedating the assessment of the legacy duty which exempts foreign religious and charitable corporations from taxation generally, or specially from taxation under the Inheritance Tax Law.”

The law of 1892 provides for a tax upon the transfer to all persons or corporations not exempt by law from taxation on real or personal property in the following cases.”

The law of 1890, chanter 553, exempts certain corporations. therein reierred to from taxation under the Inheritance Tax Law of 1885, and the acts amendatory thereof.

It has been held that the exemption of the corporations in said act referred to' are domestic corporations only.' The respondent claims that, by reason of an enabling act, chapter 557’ of Laws, of 1893, authorizing them- as follows: “shall have power to receive, take, hold and enjoy any property, real or personal, in the State of New York, by virtue of any devise, bequest, gift, grant, or purchase, subject, in respect to the amount of property it may take and hold, to the restrictions and limitar tions of existing laws, and in respect of devises and bequests from resident® of the State of New’ York, to the provisions of chapter 360 of the Laws of I860,” it is not subject to taxation. The right, to take> hold and enjoy property does not relieve the respondent from taxation any more than an act of the legislature authorizing an alien to take by grant or devise would exempt such alien from taxation under the Transfer Tax Law. That the right to take and hold is made subject to limitations of existing laws and subject to limitations of chapter 360 of the Laws of 1860, cannot be construed to relieve the respondent from the operation of the revenue laws of the State.

The decree must be modified adjudging a tax upon the succession of the respondent. Twenty-five dollars costs of appeal awarded to appellant against the respondent.

Decree modified, with $25 costs to appellant.