Case ID: f-appx_403/html/0853-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Henry BURGESS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Lynn MARTIN; James B. Ellisor; Jim Hodges; Carroll A. Campbell, Jr.; William Doug Catoe, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 10-7191.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 18, 2010.
    Decided: Dec. 2, 2010.
    
      Henry Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Steven Barry Johnson, Lee Erter Wilson Holler & Smith, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Henry Burgess appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burgess v. Martin, No. 4:09-cv-01247-RBH, 2010 WL 2812825 (D.S.C. July 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.