Case ID: f-supp-2d_341/html/0576-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BULLOCK, District Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rose Mary TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. ROSE FURNITURE COMPANY; William V. Kester; and Robert L. Kester, Defendants.
    No. 1:04 CV 00450.
    United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina.
    Oct. 26, 2004.
    Julie H. Fosbinder, Joshua R. Van Kam-pen, Charlotte, NC, for Plaintiff.
    Wade E. Ballard, Edwards Ballard Bishop Sturm Clark & Keim, P.A., Spartan-burg, SC, for Defendants.
   ORDER

BULLOCK, District Judge.

For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion filed contemporaneously herewith,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ motion [Doc. # 7] to dismiss Plaintiffs first cause of action against all Defendants entitled “Discrimination in Violation of Public Policy” is GRANTED; Defendants’ motion [Doc. # 7] to dismiss Plaintiffs second cause of action under the FMLA against the individual Defendants is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion [Doc. # 11] for a default judgment against Defendant Rose Furniture Company on Plaintiffs claim under the FMLA is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for attorney’s fees and costs is DENIED.