Case ID: f-appx_359/html/0381-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Javen KIERNAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. P. MCKINLEY, R.N.; Layton Lester, Warden, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 09-7551.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 17, 2009.
    Decided: Dec. 30, 2009.
    Javen Kiernan, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Javen Kiernan appeals the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kiernan v. McKinley, No. 1:09-cv-00387-LMB-TCB, 2009 WL 2175639 (E.D.Va. July 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.