Case ID: f-appx_476/html/0413-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Reginald YOUNG, Petitioner.
    No. 12-2100.
    United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
    Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R.App. P. May 3, 2012.
    Opinion filed: May 17, 2012.
    Reginald Young, Greenville, IL, pro se.
    Karen L. Grigsby, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for United States of America, R. Barclay Sur-rick.
    Before: SLOVITER, FISHER and WEIS, Circuit Judges.
   OPINION

PER CURIAM.

In this petition for mandamus, Reginald Young asks us to direct the “respondent” to rule on his application for a certificate of appealability. In form, the petition reads less like a request for mandamus and more like a motion to expedite proceedings. In any case, it is moot; we denied Young’s request for a certificate of appealability. See United States v. Young, C.A. No. 12-1577. Therefore, this “mandamus petition” will be denied, as Young has obtained the ruling he seeks to compel. See Carr v. Am. Red Cross, 17 F.3d 671, 684 (3d Cir.1994).