Case ID: sw3d_567/html/0305-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Brandon L. WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 106308
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: February 19, 2019
    Kristina S. Olson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO. 63101, for appellant.
    Richard A. Starnes, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.
    Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Brandon L. Wilson ("Movant") appeals from the judgment of the motion court, denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion following an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant argues trial counsel was ineffective for introducing evidence that the victim identified Movant from a photographic lineup, and for eliciting evidence of Movant's prior arrests. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to MO. R. CIV. P. 84.16(b) (2018).