Case ID: misc2d_17/html/0448-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ignazio Conigliaro, Doing Business as I. & C. Auto Express Co., Respondent, v. Central Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    March 3, 1959.
    
      
      Max J. Gwertzman and Jacob NageTberg for appellant.
    
      Benjamin Massey for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Plaintiff as contract carrier or bailee, in the absence of proof of negligence, was not legally liable for the theft of the cartons in its possession (Claflin v. Meyer, 75 N. Y. 260). Therefore plaintiff as insured was not entitled to recover pursuant to a policy issued by defendant covering its legal liability.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed on the law and facts, with $30 costs to the defendant and complaint dismissed with appropriate costs in the court below.

Concur — Pette, Hart, and Di Giovanna, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.