Case ID: so2d_884/html/0380-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, Appellant, v. Elmer Daniel PATTERSON, Appellee.
    No. 2D04-47.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Sept. 10, 2004.
    John C. Wolfe, City Attorney, and Ernest Mueller and Thomas Bustin, Assistant City Attorneys, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.
    Jennifer J. Card and Scot E. Samis of Abbey, Adams, Byelick, Kiernan, Mueller & Lancaster, L.L.P., St. Petersburg; and Diane Bailey of Law Offices of Diane Bailey, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, the City of St. Peters-burg challenges an order of the circuit court granting mandamus relief. We affirm and direct the Civil Service Board of the City of St. Petersburg to convene and consider Petitioner Patterson’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs.

Affirmed.

FULMER, DAVIS, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.