Case ID: conn_160/html/0546-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Josephine D. Ginise et al. v. Planning and Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Greenwich et al.
    Alcorn, C. J., House, Cotter, Thim and Ryan, Js.
    Argued October 7
    decided October 19, 1970
    
      
      Boceo B. P. Perna, for the appellants (plaintiffs).
    
      Sidney Vogel, with whom was Everett P. Sherwood, for the appellee (defendant Sherwood, trustee).
    
      Joseph A. Izzillo, corporation counsel, with whom was William T. Lapsevic, assistant corporation counsel, for the appellee (named defendant).
   Pee Curiam.

The conclusion of the trial court that the action of the defendant board was not arbitrary, illegal or in abuse of its discretion is amply supported by the record.

There is no error.