Case ID: md_237/html/0652-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JACKSON v. STATE
    [No. 177,
    September Term, 1964.]
    
      Decided March 4, 1965.
    
    The cause was argued before Prescott, C. J., and Hammond, Marbury, Sybert and Barnes, JJ.
    
      John R. Hargrove, with whom were Howard & Hargrove on the brief, for appellant.
    
      John A. Blondell, Special Attorney, with whom were Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General, Charles B. Moylan, Jr. and Ed
      
      ward G. Wyatt, State’s Attorney and Assistant State’s Attorney, respectively, for Baltimore City, on the brief, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

On this appeal the appellant contends that the evidence presented was insufficient to support his convictions in a non-jury trial on separate charges of robbery with a deadly weapon and of assault, and that his two consecutive sentences of seven and one-half years each were excessive.

We have reviewed the evidence and find that it was ample to warrant the convictions. The sentences were within the limits permitted by law and thus are not reviewable by us.