Case ID: njl_102/html/0216-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DAVID MAYER BREWING COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM E. ENGLER, RESPONDENT.
    Submitted May 29, 1926
    Decided December 24, 1925.
    The judges being equally divided on the question whether the judgment should be reversed, the judgment is affirmed solely because of such division, which renders any opinion by the court impossible.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court.
    For the appellant, William F. Burke.
    
    For the respondent, Samuel Harber.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, solely because the judges are equally divided on the question as to whether such judgments should be reversed.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Van Buskirk, Kays, JJ. 7.

For reversal — Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Gardner, McGlennon, JJ. 7.