Case ID: ad_258/html/0851-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Earl Hauss, Appellant, v. Rochester Button Company, Respondent.
   Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: As we read the pleadings, it wifi be open to the plaintiff to prove under the existing complaint ah that he sets forth in the proposed amended complaint. All concur. (The order denies plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve an amended complaint in an action for damages sustained by reason of contracting silicosis.) Present—Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.