Case ID: nys_152/html/1100-10.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BRINKMAN, Appellant, v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO., Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    March 17, 1915.)
    Action by Michael ICearon Brink-man against the Pennsylvania Railroad Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order rev'ersed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the evidence presents a question of fact as to whether the defendant was negligent in failing to adopt a reasonable and proper system of inspection of the chains furnished plaintiff in the performance of his work.

FOOTE, J., dissents.