Case ID: so2d_567/html/1069-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jack Phillip CATLETT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 89-1391.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 16, 1990.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Monique T. Befeler, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the conviction for armed robbery. The prosecutor’s comments during closing argument were made in response to the theory of defense and to defense counsel’s statements during both opening and closing arguments. Error, if any occurred, was both invited and harmless. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

However, we vacate the defendant’s conviction for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. State v. Smith, 547 So.2d 613 (Fla.1989); Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987).

Affirmed in part; vacated in part; remanded for correction of the record.