Case ID: misc2d_38/html/1024-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Stanton Vollman, Appellant.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    November 29, 1962.
    
      
      Irwin D. Strauss for appellant. Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney (Arthur C. Muhlstock of counsel), for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The record shows that the defendant was committed to an institution for the care of those mentally ill and the court below notified thereof in substantial compliance with section 873 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This constituted a final disposition of the offense, not a crime, with which he was charged, under the express provision of that section. It was, therefore, error to impose sentence, even though the sentence was suspended.

The judgment of conviction should be reversed on the law and facts and complaint dismissed.

Concur — Hecht, J. P., Hoestadter and Gold, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.