Case ID: ohio-st-2d_1/html/0108-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gegner, d. b. a. Gegner’s Barber Shop, Appellant, v. Graham, Appellee, et al.
    [Cite as Gegner v. Graham, 1 Ohio St. 2d 108.]
    (No. 38719
    Decided March 3, 1965.)
    
      
      Mr. Harry W. Kyle, for appellant.
    
      Messrs. Sindell, Sindell, Bourne é Markus and Mr. John E. Duda, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Since plaintiff has sold his barbershop and is no longer operating it and since the present owner is giving to Negroes “the full enjoyment of the accommodations, advantages, facilities and privileges of his place of business,” the case is moot. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. Minor v. Witt, City Clerk, 82 Ohio St. 237.

Appeal dismissed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.