Case ID: ky_69/html/0514-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "JUDGE PETERS", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Case 61 — PETITION ORDINARY —
    February 1.
    Pauer v. Simon.
    APPEAL PROM JEPPERSON COURT OP COMMON PLEAS.
    1. An order of wrest, issued without affidavit, as required by tbe Civil Code, secs. 179, 180, is invalid.
    
    2. Without such affidavit the clerk has no authority to make such order; and if the record does not show that the affidavit was made, the wrest and taláng hail from the defendant in the action were unauthorized.
    
    3. If the proper affidavit had been in fact made before the order of arrest was made, the failure of the record to show that necessary fact should have been corrected in the circuit court.
    
      Í. A bail bond executed by the defendant in a civil action to secure release from an unauthorized order of arrest is invalid.
    
    5. Judgment against the defendant on an invalid bail bond is not a clerical misprision, but is an error appearing on the face of the record, for which the court of appeals will reverse.
    
    Robert J. Elliott,........Eor Appellant.
    Clemmons & Willis,........Eor Appellee.
   JUDGE PETERS

delivered the opinion op the court.

Whether or not tbe order of arrest was properly sustained is tbe only question presented by this appeal.

Section 179, Civil Code, provides tbat a defendant in a civil action can be arrested and beld to bail only upon tbe conditions and in tbe manner prescribed in chapter 1, title 8, Civil Code.

Section 180 (ibid.) provides tbat an order for tbe arrest of tbe defendant shall be made by tbe clerk of tbe court in which tbe action is brought at its commencement, or at any time before judgment, when there is filed in bis office an affidavit of tbe plaintiff stating tbe facts therein set forth.

The affidavit therefore is made an indispensable prerequisite for the order of arrest; without it the clerk has no authority to make such order; and as in this case the record does not show that the affidavit was made, the arrest and taking the bail bond from the defendant in the action were unauthorized.

This is not a clerical misprision, as contended for by counsel for appellee, but is an error appearing on the face of the record, for which this court should reverse the judgment sustaining the order of arrest. If the proper affidavit had been, in fact, made before the order of arrest was made, the failure of the record to show the necessary fact should have been corrected in the court below.

"Wherefore the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded, with directions to discharge the order of arrest, and for further proceedings consistent herewith.