Case ID: njl_110/html/0014-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HARRY KATZ, APPELLANT, v. FANNIE ZAPELA ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Submitted October 28, 1932
    Decided January 5, 1933.
    Por the appellant, Emil Neblo.
    
    Por the respondents;, Minium & Weinberger.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam, in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 258.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Brogan, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.