Case ID: f-appx_380/html/0293-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David J. WASHINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry W. PROPES, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 10-1181.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 20, 2010.
    Decided: May 26, 2010.
    David J. Washington, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David J. Washington appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, as modified, dismissing Washington’s complaint without prejudice and denying his motion for judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. Propes, No. 4:09-cv-03050-RBH, 2010 WL 297796 (D.S.C. Jan. 21, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.