Case ID: f-appx_377/html/0603-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antoine M. MERCADEL, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-30280.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 5, 2010.
    
    Filed April 21, 2010.
    Timothy John Ohms, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USSP-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Antoine M. Mercadel, Lompoc, CA, pro se.
    Before: RYMER, MCKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Antoine M. Mercadel appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduced sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Mercadel contends that the district court erred by denying his motion in light of Amendment 706 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. This contention fails because Mercadel was sentenced pursuant to the statutory mandatory minimum. See United States v. Paulk, 569 F.3d 1094, 1095-96 (9th Cir.2009) (per cu-riam) (“Paulk is not entitled to a reduction because his sentence was not based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), but rather was based on the statutory mandatory minimum under 21 U.S.C. § 841.”) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Mercadel’s motion to stay proceedings is denied.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.