Case ID: f-appx_217/html/0663-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Howard Preston THOMAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Teresa A. SCHWARTZ, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 05-15135.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 8, 2007 .
    Filed Jan. 11, 2007.
    Howard Preston Thomas, Vacaville, CA, pro se.
    Justain P. Riley, DAG, AGCA—Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
    Before: ALARCÓN, HALL, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

California state prisoner Howard Preston Thomas appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253.

Reviewing de novo, Miles v. Prunty, 187 F.3d 1104, 1105 (9th Cir.1999), we affirm for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations filed on August 18, 2004, and adopted by the district court.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.