Case ID: so2d_194/html/0643-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PENNSYLVANIA LUMBERMEN’S MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Carl SPIEGEL, Appellee.
    No. 66-376.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    Jan. 24, 1967.
    Rehearing Denied Feb. 22, 1967.
    Blackwell, Walker & Gray and Melvin T. Boyd, Miami, for appellant.
    Wilensky, Brannen, Schroll & Druckman, Miami, for appellee.
    Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order confirming an arbitration award made pursuant to the uninsured motorist coverage. The appellant attempted to argue in the circuit court, and later in this court, its version of the weight of the evidence. The chancellor correctly held that the petitioner had failed to state grounds for vacating the award. See Fla.Stat. § 57.22, F.S.A.; Kest v. Nathanson, Fla.App.1966, 184 So.2d 690.

Affirmed.