Case ID: sw3d_185/html/0710-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Theodore POLLARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 64689.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Jan. 24, 2006.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 28, 2006.
    Theodore Pollard, Cameron, pro se.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, for Respondent.
    Before: JOSEPH M. ELLIS, P.J., THOMAS H. NEWTON, and LISA WHITE HARDWICK JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Theodore Pollard appeals the denial of his 29.15 post-conviction motion. Mr. Pollard raises four points of error in this appeal, which can be summarized into the following: (1) the motion court erred when it failed to hold a Luleff (abandonment) hearing to determine if post-conviction relief counsel (PCR) abandoned Mr. Pollard; and (2) the motion court erred when it found that Mr. Pollard had effective assistance of trial counsel.

For the reasons set forth in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).