Case ID: pa_371/html/0646-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cubiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Griffin Appeal.
    Argued November 20, 1952.
    Before Stern, C. J., Stearns, Jones, Bell, Chidsey and Musmanno, JJ.
    
      
      John M. Smith, Jr., for appellant.
    
      Ralph S. Croskey, with him John Martin Doyle, for appellee.
    November 25, 1952:
   Opinion

Pee Cubiam,

The decree of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of Judges Paeey and Mawhinney.

It was suggested-during the course of the argument that the degree of appellant’s moral turpitude disclosed in the record of the disbarment proceedings did not justify his disbarment, but, at most, his suspension for a limited period of time. This suggestion would, more properly, be for the consideration of the court if an application for reinstatement be filed at some future time.