Case ID: so2d_829/html/0901-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. Patrick SWETT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. SC01-1.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Oct. 10, 2002.
    Terrence E. Kehoe and Donald R. West, Orlando, FL, for Petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, FL, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision in State v. Swett, 772 So.2d 48 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), based on alleged express and direct conflict with Frazier v. State, 766 So.2d 459 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), and Daniels v. State, 568 So.2d 63 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this case.

It is so ordered.

ANSTEAD, C.J., SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., and HARDING, Senior Justice, concur.