Case ID: so2d_658/html/0927-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SHAW, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Roger Anthony DANIELS, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 83982.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    May 4, 1995.
    Rehearing Denied July 5, 1995.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender and S.C. Van Voorhees, Asst. Public Defender, Dayto-na Beach, for petitioners.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, and Parker D. Thomson and Carol A. Licko, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Miami, for respondent.
   SHAW, Justice.

We have for review State v. Daniels, 639 So.2d 624 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), wherein the district court relied on Bouters v. State, 634 So.2d 246 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), to reverse a trial court order finding Florida’s stalking statute, § 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992), unconstitutional. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We recently reviewed Bouters and found the statute constitutional. See Bouters v. State, No. 83,558, — So.2d - (Fla. Apr. 27, 1995). Accordingly, we approve the district court decision in Daniels.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.