Case ID: f-appx_219/html/0640-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto CERVANTES-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-50030.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 27, 2006.
    
    Filed Jan. 19, 2007.
    Steven E. Stone, Esq., San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Robert H. Rexrode, III, Esq., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: BRIGHT, BEA, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
    
      
       The Honorable Myron H. Bright, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Roberto Cervantes-Flores appeals his sentence, which was reaffirmed on a limited remand pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). Cervantes-Flores had no right to allocute during the limited remand under our decision in Ameline, our due process jurisprudence, or Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. See United States v. Silva, 472 F.3d 683, 686-87 (9th Cir.2007).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.