Case ID: cal_59/html/0391-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "The Court:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 10,651.
    Department Two.]
    THE PEOPLE v. CHARLES MARSHALL.
    Grand Larceny—Instructions—Definition.—It is not grand larceny to steal property, unless it is of a value exceeding fifty dollars.
    Appeal from a judgment of conviction in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Ferral, J.
    
      Laura de Force Gordon, for Appellant.
    No brief on file for Respondent.
   The Court:

The defendant was charged with the crime of grand larceny, and was convicted of that crime in the Court below. On the trial the Court gave the following charge to the jury: “If they (the prosecution) prove that any of the things herein charged to have been stolen, either singly or altogether, were worth fifty dollars or over, * * * then that would be sufficient to warrant the jury in finding the defendant guilty of grand larceny.”

The things charged to have been stolen consisted of certain articles of jewelry described in the information, and under Section 487 of the Penal Code, it is not grand larceny to steal such property, unless it is of a value exceeding fifty dollars.

The instruction was erroneous, and the judgment must be-reversed. So ordered.