Case ID: sw3d_573/html/0763-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel K. MCKAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 106621
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    FILED: May 7, 2019
    Emily S. Danker-Feldman, 120 S. Central Ave., Ste. 130, Clayton, MO 63105, for appellant.
    Gregory L. Barnes, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
    Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM

Daniel K. McKay ("McKay") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing for ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. In his sole point on appeal, McKay argues that appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to cite the proper burden of proof for prejudice in appealing the denial of McKay's speedy trial motion under the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Law ("UMDDL").

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).