Case ID: f-appx_400/html/0557-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., and Honeywell Intellectual Properties Inc., Plaintiff-Appellants, v. NOKIA CORPORATION, Nokia Inc., Fujitsu Limited, Fujitsu America, Inc., Fujitsu Computer Products of America, Inc., All Around Co. Ltd., Boe-Hydis Technology Co. Ltd., Picvue Electronics Limited, Curitel Communications, Inc., Koninklijk Philips Electronics N.V., High Tech Computer Corporation, Wistron Corporation, Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co., Matsushita Electronical Corporation of America, Seiko Epson Corporation, Argus (also known as Hartford Computer Group.), Toshiba America, Inc., and Toshiba Corporation, Defendants, and Fujifilm Corporation and Fujifilm U.S.A., Defendants-Appellees, and Samsung SDI America Inc. and Samsung SDI Co. Ltd., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 2010-1121.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    Nov. 1, 2010.
    Rehearing Denied Dec. 16, 2010.
    Martin R. Lueck, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P., of Minneapolis, MN, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Matthew L. Woods and Stacie E. Oberts.
    Lawrence Rosenthal, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, of New York, NY, argued for defendants-appellees Fujifilm Corporation, et al. With him on the brief were Ian G. Dibernardo, Angie M. Hankins, and Matthew W. Siegal.
    Stephen S. Korniczky, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, of San Diego, CA, argued for defendants-appellees Samsung SDI America Inc., et al.
    Before NEWMAN, LINN, and PROST, Circuit Judges.
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.