Case ID: ohio-st-3d_66/html/1407-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Tuesday, February 2, 1993
    
    MOTION DOCKET
    93-104.
    State ex rel. Lowe v. Judges of the Court of Appeals for the Third App. Dist.
   In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for stay and motion for peremptory writ,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion for stay be, and the same is hereby, denied, effective February 1, 1993.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that said motion for peremptory writ be, and the same is hereby, denied, effective February 1, 1993.

Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., would also dismiss the cause.