Case ID: cust-ct_59/html/0927-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. R67/122.
    No. R67/123.
    International Packers, Limited v. United States, reappraisement R61/7773 (Charleston, S.C.). International Packers, Limited v. United States, re-appraisement R61/19767 (New Orleans). Wilson & Co., Inc. v. United States, reappraisements R62/13837, R62/15100, and R61/12448 (San Francisco).
    No. R67/124.
   In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in International Packers, Limited v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 636, Heap. Dec. 11147) as to the merchandise appraised on the basis of export value, and International Packers, Limited v. United States (52 Cust. Ct. 472, Reap. Dec. 10696) as to the merchandise appraised on the basis of United States value, the court found and held that export value and United States value as defined in sections 402(b) and 402a (e), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, are the proper bases for determining value of the entered canned meat products, listed on schedule “B,” under the headings “Export Value” and “United States Value,” packed in container sizes identified on such schedule, and exported from Argentina during the period January 1, 1959, through December 31,1959, described on the invoices of the entries covered by these appeals for reappraisement, and that such value per dozen tins, net packed, are the respective values shown as plaintiffs’ claimed values on schedule “B,” for the respective products and sizes of container described on the invoices and stated in the entries and recited in schedule “B,” under the headings “Export Value” and “United States Value,” during those periods which correspond to the respective times of exportation of the schedule “B” canned meats, described under the headings “Export Value” and “United States Value,” covered by these appeals for reappraisement, said schedule “B” being attached to and made a part of these decisions.