Case ID: kan_26/html/0412-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Vadentine, J.:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary E. W. Reid, et al., v. Joseph Dixon.
    
      Error from Rooks District Court.
    
    Action brought by Dixon against Reid and two others, upon an undertaking in appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace. At the October Term, 1880, of the district court, the plaintiff- recovered a judgment for $138.80 and costs against defendants, who bring the case here.
    
      McNulty & Johnson, and R. G.Hays, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Earner & Denney, and Woods & Smith, for defendant in error.
   The opinion of the court was delivered by

Vadentine, J.:

This was an action on an appeal bond. Judgment was rendered in the court below in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants, who bring the case to this court. The plaintiffs in error have not filed any brief in the case, but one of their counsel argued the case orally before us.

We perceive no errors in the rulings or judgment of the court below, and therefore the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.