Case ID: nj-eq_92/html/0257-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

H. J. Jaeger, respondent, v. John M. Hannan, appellant.
    [Decided October 21st, 1920.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, whose opinion is reported in 90 N. J. Eq. 396.
    
    
      Messrs. Weller..& Lichtenstein, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. J. Emil Walscheirl, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis.

For affirmance—Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Katzenbaci-i, White, Williams, Taylor—7.

For reversal—The Chief-Justice, Minturn, Kalisci-t, Black, Heppenheimer—5.