Case ID: so2d_519/html/0746-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gustavo NOVO, as personal representative of the Estate of Gustavo Enrique Novo, deceased, on behalf of said Estate, and on behalf of the lawful survivors of Gustavo Enrique Novo, deceased, to wit: Gustavo Novo and Emilia Novo, Appellants, v. The CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 86-1582.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Feb. 9, 1988.
    
      Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Tutan, O’Hara, McCoy, Graham & Lane and Shelley H. Leinicke, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
    John R. Dellagloria, City Atty., for appel-lee.
    Before HENDRY, HUBBART and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Compare Wong v. City of Miami, 237 So.2d 132 (Fla.1970), Alderman v. Lamar, 493 So.2d 495 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), rev. denied, 503 So.2d 326 (Fla. 1987) and Eder v. Dep’t of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, 463 So.2d 443 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) with State, Dep’t of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Kropff 491 So.2d 1252 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) and Weissberg v. City of Miami Beach, 383 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).