Case ID: so3d_211/html/0374-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William Kirk ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    CASE NO. 1D16-4656
    1D16-4657
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Opinion filed March 10, 2017
    Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Jennifer J. Moore and Jason W. Rodriguez, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We sua sponte consolidate these appeals for disposition. Appellant seeks review of orders revoking his probation and sentencing him to prison. He argues in each case and the state properly concedes that by failing to conduct an appropriate plea colloquy before revoking appellant’s probation and sentencing him, the trial court reversibly erred and violated the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172(c). See Haug v. State, 151 So.3d 560 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). Accordingly, we REVERSE the orders revoking probation and the judgments and sentences entered thereon, and REMAND for further proceedings.

WOLF, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., CONCUR.