Case ID: f-appx_675/html/0326-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daryl A. GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE CENTECH GROUP; Fernando V. Galaviz; Karen Strawbridge, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 16-2113
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: January 31, 2017
    Decided: February 2, 2017
    Daryl A. Green, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Philip Postol, SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daryl A. Green appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Green v. The Centech Grp., No. 1:16-cv-00753-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. Aug. 25, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional pro cess.

AFFIRMED