Case ID: f-appx_533/html/0352-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Samuel Lynn HARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DURHAM; City of Durham Employees; FBI/DOJ, All of their Employees and Educators; EEOC, All of their Employees and Educators; Norment Security Group; Cormetech, Inc.; Doug McNay; CAE USA, Inc.; Darren Ugless; Lockheed Martin; NC DOT, Traffic Engineering Division; Walmart, Lumberton, NC; Goshen Rubber, Inc., (GNC) Wilson, NC; Robeson Community College, Lumberton, NC; Lumberton Senior High School, Lumberton, NC; CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Service Company, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 13-1612.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 18, 2013.
    Decided: July 22, 2013.
    Samuel Lynn Harrison, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Lynn Harrison appeals the district court’s order dismissing his amended complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harrison v. City of Durham, No. 5:13-cv-00082-D (E.D.N.C. Apr. 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.