Case ID: so2d_629/html/0928-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard Lee EDDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-3055.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Dec. 3, 1993.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Daniel J. Schafer, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Barbara Arlene Fink, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The State concedes that appellant’s sentencing form contains a scrivener’s error. Accordingly, Eddy’s sentence is corrected to conform to the jury verdict finding him guilty of burglary of a dwelling with a battery or assault. We find Eddy’s remaining point on appeal to be without merit.

Sentence AFFIRMED as corrected.

DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.