Case ID: f-appx_623/html/0318-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian BLURTON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 14-50301.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Oct. 22, 2015.
    Filed Nov. 19, 2015.
    Jean-Claude Andre, Assistant U.S., Jerry Chenwei Yang, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Elizabeth Richardson-Royer, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: KOZINSKI, IKUTA and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
   MEMORANDUM

The district court erred by ordering restitution without disaggregating “the losses, including ongoing losses, caused by the original abuse of [each] victim ... from the losses caused by the ongoing distribution and possession of images of that original abuse, to the extent possible.” United States v. Galan, No. 14-30145, 804 F.3d 1287, 1291, 2015 WL 6736535 (9th Cir. Nov. 4, 2015).

The restitution order is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with Galan. 
      
      
         This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.