Case ID: so2d_273/html/0140-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Irma JONES, Appellant, v. Floyd KELLY, Appellee.
    No. 72-287.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Feb. 19, 1973.
    Gershon S. Miller, Miami Beach, for appellant.
    Bradford, Williams, McKay, Kimbrell, Hamann & Jennings and Walter S. Holland, Miami, for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment based upon a jury verdict for the defendant in a negligence action. Essentially, appellant contends that a new trial should have been granted because the jury was confused in the application of the trial judge’s instructions on the law to the facts of the case. Our review of the record before us convinces us that the limited record presented is not sufficient to demonstrate error. See Cleeland v. Miami Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., Fla.App.1964, 159 So.2d 260. All other points have been reviewed and do not constitute reversible error.

Affirmed.