Case ID: f-appx_122/html/0447-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HARTZ, Circuit Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge Antonio RAMOS-LERMA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 04-1301.
    United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
    March 3, 2005.
    Uy Till, John W. Suthers, U.S. Attorney, Jerry N. Jones, Office of the United States Attorney, Denver, CO, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Raymond P. Moore, Fed. Public Defender, Warren R. Williamson, Asst. F.P.D., Denver, CO, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before SEYMOUR, HARTZ, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER AND JUDGMENT

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Jorge Antonio Ramos-Lerma appeals his sentence after a plea of guilty to the charge of illegal reentry by a previously deported alien, 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He was sentenced at the bottom end of the applicable Guideline range. His sole ground of appeal is that the mandatory Guideline regime under which he was sentenced is unconstitutional under Blakely v. Washington, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403(2004), and its progeny.

Defendant preserved this issue below. In a Rule 28(j) letter the Government eon-cedes, as it should, that this case is governed by United States v. Labastida-Segura, 396 F.3d 1140 (10th Cir.2005), and it consents to remand for resentencing.

We REVERSE Defendant’s sentence and REMAND to the district court for resentencing. 
      
       After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.