Case ID: mich_498/html/0909-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Orders Granting Oral Argument in Cases Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal Entered October 30, 2015:
    
    People v Douglas,
    No. 150789; Court of Appeals No. 315027.
   The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether People v Lockridge, 498 Mich 358 (2015), by rendering the sentencing guidelines advisory and/or by employing a remedy that does not mandate resentencing, affects (1) whether a defendant can be afforded relief for an unpreserved meritorious challenge to the scoring of offense variables through a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, see People v Francisco, 474 Mich 82, 89 n 8 (2006); and (2) the scope of relief, if any, to which a defendant is entitled when the defendant raises a meritorious challenge to the scoring of an offense variable, whether preserved or unpreserved, and the error changes the applicable guidelines range, whether the defendant’s sentence falls within the corrected range or not. See id. at 89-90; see also People v Kimble, 470 Mich 305, 310 (2004). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.