Case ID: f-appx_503/html/0192-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kirk Lee LONEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mark SIMS, Officer, Richmond Police Department, sued in both official and individual capacity; UNKNOWN # 1, Officers, Fed. State and City; George, Trooper, Virginia State Police, sued in individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees, and M.A. Harrison, Officer, Badge # 1925, Richmond Police Department, sued in both official and individual capacity; C.L. Martin, Officer, Richmond Police Department, sued in both official and individual capacity; Herman Loney, Captain, Richmond Police Department, sued in both official and individual capacity; Hixson, Officer, Richmond Police Department, sued in both official and individual capacity; Unknown # 2, Officers, Richmond Police Department; Unknown # 3, Trooper George’s Supervisor, Virginia State Police, sued in individual capacity; Unknown # 4, Police and Agents, Virginia State Police, sued in individual capacity; Unknown # 5, E.R. Staff, Hospital Staff and Sheriff Deputies, V.C.U. Health Care Systems, sued in both official and individual capacity; C.T. Woody, Sheriff, Richmond City Jail, sued in both official and individual capacity; Kernelle William Burnette, Richmond City Jail, sued in both individual and official capacity; Unknown # 6, Captain of Medical, Richmond City Jail, sued in both individual and official capacity; Unknown # 7, Captain of Jail House Operations, Richmond City Jail, sued in both individual and official capacity; Unknown # 8, Captain of Records Department, Richmond City Jail, sued in both individual and official capacity; Unknown # 9, All Medical Staff, Richmond City Jail, sued in both individual and official capacity; Unknown # 10, All Deputies Working A-2 left and Deputies who worked my hospital stay, Richmond City Jail, sued in both individual and official capacity; Jeffrey Frazier, Superintendent, Northern Neck Regional Jail, sued in individual capacity; Sudduth, Captain, Northern Neck Regional Jail, sued in individual capacity; Unknown # 11, Nursing Staff and Doctors, Northern Neck Regional Jail, sued in individual capacity; Unknown # 12, Correctional Officers, Northern Neck Regional Jail, sued in individual capacity; Hickey, Captain, Northern Neck Regional Jail, sued in individual capacity; Frederick, Ms., Grievance Coordinator, Northern Neck Regional Jail, sued in individual capacity; Unknown # 13, Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearm Agents, sued in individual capacity; Patricia R. Stansberry, Warden, FCC Petersburg, sued in individual capacity; Evans, Captain, FCC Petersburg, sued in individual capacity; Tushar C. Shah, Dr., FCC Petersburg, sued in individual capacity; Benjamin Rice, Dr., FCC Petersburg, sued in individual capacity; Alejandro Hadded, P.A., FCC Petersburg, sued in individual capacity; Yerga, P.A., FCC Petersburg, sued in individual capacity; Pugh, Dr., FCC Petersburg, sued in individual capacity; Engel, Associate Warden, FCC Petersburg, sued in individual capacity; Cuffee, Counselor, FCC Petersburg, sued in individual capacity; Brown, Case Manager, FCC Petersburg, sued in individual capacity; Kiddy, Unit Manager, FCC Petersburg, sued in individual capacity; Nagal, Dr., FCC Petersburg, sued in individual capacity; Douglas L. Wilder, Mayor, sued in both official and individual capacity; Rodney Monroe, Ex-Richmond Police Chief, sued in both official and individual capacity; Drew, Captain, Richmond Police Department, sued in both official and individual capacity, Defendants.
    No. 12-6568.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 27, 2012.
    Decided: Oct. 1, 2012.
    Kirk L. Loney, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Kraig Telfair, Deputy City Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; George Walerian Chaba-lewski, Office Of The Attorney General Of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appel-lees.
    Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kirk Lee Loney appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Loney v. Sims, No. 3:08-cv-00820-REP, 2012 WL 617977 (E.D.Va. Feb. 24, 2012 & Apr. 9, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.