Case ID: sw3d_529/html/0830-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Frederick SPENCER, Appellant.
    No. ED 104863
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    FILED: June 20, 2017
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied September 25, 2017
    FOR APPELLANT: Frederick Spencer PRO SE, 11971 Rosevalley Lane, St. Louis, MO 63138.
    FOR RESPONDENT; JOSHUA D. HAWLEY, Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Frederick Spencer (“Movant”)- appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 74.06(b) motion to vacate the adverse judgment of his previously denied motions for post-conviction DNA testing, pursuant Section 547.035 (RSMo. Cum. Supp. 2001), without an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted of three counts of forcible sodomy, in violation of Section 566.060 (RSMo. 1994), and one count of attempted rape, in violation of Section 566.030 (RSMo. 1994). Movant was sentenced to 15 years of imprisonment and-was discharged from the Missouri Department of Corrections on -October 5, 2014, after completing his sentence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would • be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for. this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).