Case ID: a3d_163/html/0395-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION and Pennsylvania State Police, Petitioners v. STATE EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent Bruce A. Edwards, Joseph R. Kovel, Joseph E. Sarkis, PA State Troopers Association, Intervenors
    No. 76 MAL 2016
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    August 3, 2016
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as framed by Petitioners, is as follows:

Did [the] Commonwealth Court erroneously affirm the decision of the State Employees’ Retirement Board that union stipends, paid to union officers to-work exclusively for the union, are retirement-covered compensation, when that decision was clearly contrary to the mandates of the State Employees’ Retirement Code and inconsistent with decisions of this Honorable Court?