Case ID: nj-eq_71/html/0300-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      .Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eureka Fire Hose Company, respondent, v. Eureka Rubber Manufacturing Company, appellant.
    [Argued March 8th, 1906.
    Decided November 19th, 1906.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported, in <6& N. J. Eq. 159. ■ .
    
      Mr. John’V. B. Wicojf, for. the appellant.
    
      Messrs. Crouse cC Perhins, for the respondent.
   .Per Curiam.

Tbe decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Emery.

For affirmance—Garrison, Port, Garketson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Vroom, Gray—10.

For reversal—None.