Case ID: sw3d_456/html/0886-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, EX REL. Chris KOSTER, Missouri Attorney General, Respondent, v. Samuel MARTIN, Appellant
    WD 77240
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    ORDER FILED: March 17, 2015
    Michael D. Morris, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Samuel D. Martin, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before Division Three: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge
   Per curiam:

Samuel D. Martin’s inmate account is currently subject to the Missouri Incarceration Reimbursement Act. He seeks to set aside the original judgment as void under Rule 74.06(b)(4). The trial court held that jurisdiction was proper in the original judgment and that adequate due process was afforded. Martin brings this appeal to challenge the trial court’s denial of his motion to set aside the previous judgment. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).