Case ID: f-appx_489/html/0732-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Douglas G. WHITFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer LEE; Officer Stancil; Lieutenant Smith, Defendants-Appellees, and Dick Jenkins, Sheriff; Randle Smith, Lieutenant; Darrel Land, Detective, Defendants.
    No. 12-7110.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 20, 2012.
    Decided: Nov. 26, 2012.
    Douglas G. Whitfield, Appellant Pro Se. Sonny Sade Haynes, Womble Carlyle San-dridge & Rice, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Douglas G. Whitfield appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the defendants on his claims filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Whitfield v. Lee, No. 5:10-ct-03151-D, 2012 WL 2374659 (E.D.N.C. June 22, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.