Case ID: so2d_875/html/0786-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John FELSO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D01-3210.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 23, 2004.
    Weiner & Ratzan and Jeffrey S. Weiner and Mycki Ratzan, Miami, for appellant.
    Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Consuelo Maingot (Ft. Lauderdale), Assistant Attorney General and Melissa Vaughan Rubin, Certified out-of-state practioner, for appellee.
    Before LEVY, GODERICH, and WELLS, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises two issues on appeal. We affirm the trial court as to both. As to the first issue, concerning the question of the claim of newly discovered evidence, our affirmance is without prejudice to the appellant to file any motion that might be appropriate under Rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.

In view of the fact that we find that appellant’s second point lacks merit, we do not further address it herein.