Case ID: nj-eq_99/html/0876-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert Berry, respondent, v. Thomas E. Stewart et al., appellants.
    [Decided April 1st, 1926.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.
    
      Mr. John 0. Reed, for the respondent.
    
      Messrs. Oole & Cole, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, and reported in S N. J. Mis. R. 1057.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Mc-Glennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.