Case ID: nw2d_928/html/0213-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darrell WILDER, a/k/a Darrell John Wilder, a/k/a Darrell J. Wilder, Defendant-Appellant.
    SC: 159001 COA: 327491
    Supreme Court of Michigan.
    June 12, 2019
    Order
   On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 27, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE Part III of the Court of Appeals opinion, and we REMAND this case to that court for reconsideration of the defendant's argument. The Court of Appeals erred in asserting that the erroneously admitted testimony of Tameachi Wilder regarding her knowledge of the defendant's prior firearms-related convictions was harmless due to the "untainted and unequivocal testimony" of two police officers that they saw the defendant in possession of the gun. The Court of Appeals failed to acknowledge that two other witnesses (Charmell Richardson and Carlos Wilder) offered testimony that contradicted that testimony. That failure resulted in the Court of Appeals effectively determining that the officers' testimony was credible and that Richardson's and Wilder's was not. On remand, the Court of Appeals shall engage in "an examination of the entire cause," People v. Lukity , 460 Mich. 484, 495-496, 596 N.W.2d 607 (1999), and reconsider whether it is more probable than not that the error was outcome determinative.

We do not retain jurisdiction.