Case ID: ny_196/html/0559-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Darwin Rudd, Respondent, v. Isaac Winkler et a1., Trading under the Name of Isaac Winkler & Brother, Appellants.
    
      Budcl v. Winkler, 126 App. Div. 950, affirmed.
    (Argued October 28, 1909;
    decided November 16, 1909.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered August 15, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract of sale.
    
      J\dius M. Mayer, Eugene Sondheim and A. S. Gilbert for appellants.
    
      Henry IF Rudd and My Gready Syhes for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Cli. J., Gray, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.