Case ID: so2d_572/html/1032-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Randy BOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 90-934.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Jan. 17, 1991.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Paolo G. Annino, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David G. Mersch, Daytona Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the lower court; however, as in Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), we certify to the supreme court the following question:

DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?

PETERSON, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.