Case ID: ga-app_5/html/0816-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Russell, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

1668.
    Sirmans v. The State.
    Submitted February 24,
    Decided March 16, 1909.
    
      E. 8. Longley, for plaintiff in error.
    
      W. E. Wooten, solicitor-general, contra.
   Russell, J.

The bill of exceptions should have been certified by the judge who presided in the trial in the lower court. , His successor was. without authority to certify the bill of exceptions; and consequently the writ of error must be dismissed. The ruling is controlled by the decision in Scott v. State, ante, 812 (63 S. E. 936).

Writ of error dismissed.