Case ID: sw3d_25/html/0569-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MIDWEST PRECISION CASTINGS COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. MICRODYNE, INC., Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 76681.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    July 11, 2000.
    Jack F. Allen, Clayton, for appellant.
    E. Darrell Davis, St. Charles, for respondent.
    Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, P.J. and MARY K HOFF, J. and JAMES A. PUDLOWSKI, S.J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Microdyne, Inc. appeals the judgment of the trial court granting a motion for a directed verdict in favor of Midwest Precision Castings Company.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).