Case ID: f-appx_565/html/0270-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John B. KIMBLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dean WITHERS, CEO; Darlene Sites; F & M Bank Corp, DefendantsAppellees.
    No. 13-2448.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 27, 2014.
    Decided: April 10, 2014.
    John B. Kimble, Appellant Pro Se. David Alvin Penrod, Grant David Penrod, Hoover Penrod PLC, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

John B. Kimble appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss Kimble’s civil action, and its order denying relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kimble v. Withers, No. 5:12-cv-00110-MFU (WD.Va. Nov. 21 & Dec. 12, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Although Kimble did not file a separate notice of appeal from the latter order, we construe his amended informal brief as a notice of appeal from that order. See Smith v. Barry, 502 U.S. 244, 248-49, 112 S.Ct. 678, 116 L.Ed.2d 678 (1992).