Case ID: so2d_291/html/0068-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William D. SANDERS, Appellant, v. Kenneth C. IMPELLITIER et al., Appellees.
    No. 73-313.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    March 8, 1974.
    
      William D. Sanders and Donald L. Bur-rie, Pompano Beach, for appellant.
    Richard A. Bird of Bird & Carpenter, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

The defendant, in a civil action for damages, filed interlocutory appeal seeking review of an order granting the plaintiffs’ motion for inspection and discovery and denying the defendant’s motion for a protective order. The order is non-appealable and we, therefore, lack jurisdiction. We decline to treat the interlocutory appeal as a petition for common law cer-tiorari as it has not been made to appear that appellant does not have a full, adequate and complete remedy by appeal after final judgment. Kauffman v. King, Fla. 1956, 89 So.2d 24; Simpson v. Broward County, Fla.App.1970, 241 So.2d 193; Bland v. Mitchell, Fla.App.1970, 231 So.2d 224.

Interlocutory appeal dismissed.

OWEN, C. J., and CROSS and DOW-NEY, JJ., concur.