Case ID: so2d_663/html/0008-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY CO., a Connecticut corporation, Appellant, v. Jean H. STOLL, Appellee.
    No. 95-20.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Nov. 16, 1995.
    Rehearing Denied Dec. 14, 1995.
    
      John A. Forgas, III, of Saalfield, Catlin & Coulson, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.
    Stephen A Hould of Jensen & Hould, Jacksonville Beach, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from a final judgment entered following a directed verdict on causation in a personal injury action. We must reverse and remand for a new trial because evidence on causation was conflicting and should have been presented to the jury for determination. Kowkabany v. Home Depot, Inc., 606 So.2d 716, 719-20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (directed verdict can be upheld only if there is no evidence or inference from the evidence which will support the non-moving party’s position).

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL.

BOOTH, MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.