Case ID: njl_103/html/0194-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FRANKLIN REALTY AND MORTGAGE COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE ET AL., APPELLANTS.
    Submitted May 28, 1926
    Decided October 18, 1926.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is printed in 4 N. J. Mis. R. 109.
    Por the appellants, Riker & Riker.
    
    Por the respondent, Howe & Davis.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the.opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.