Case ID: so2d_887/html/1236-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. David Allen FULLER, Respondent.
    No. SC04-379.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Oct. 21, 2004.
    
      Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, Kellie A. Nielen, Assistant Attorney General and Pamela J. Roller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, FL, for Petitioner.
    Heather M. Gray, Riverview, FL, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The State of Florida petitions for review of Fuller v. State, 867 So.2d 469 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), which certified conflict with the decision in Davis v. State, 710 So.2d 1051 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Although we have jurisdiction, see art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const., given the First District’s recent decision in Kiedrowski v. State, 876 So.2d 692 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004), which followed Fuller and distinguished Davis, we conclude that no actual conflict exists and decline to exercise our discretion to review the case.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, QUINCE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.