Case ID: misc2d_171/html/0334-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Memorandum.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[659 NYS2d 690]
    Forest Hills Gardens Corporation, Respondent, v Herman Kamp, Appellant.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    March 4, 1997
    APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Herman Kamp, appellant pro se. Ribakove & Ramirez, Forest Hills (Ronald W. Ramirez and Ben Feder of counsel), for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Orders unanimously affirmed without costs.

Under the circumstances presented, the lower court did not abuse its discretion in denying oral argument and limiting disclosure. We find defendant’s other contentions raised on appeal to be without merit.

Kassoff, P. J., Chetta and Patterson, JJ., concur.