Case ID: so2d_325/html/0464-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ralph YANNOTTA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 75-62.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Jan. 23, 1976.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Elliot R. Brooks, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Thomas M. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., and James T. Connolly, Legal Intern, State Attorney’s Office, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant, convicted of both false imprisonment and robbery, raises as his sole point on appeal the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction of robbery. The point is without merit. The record discloses sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction of appellant under the aider and abettor statute, Fla.Stat. § 776.011 (1973). See, Davis v. State, 275 So.2d 575 (Fla.App. 1st 1973).

Affirmed.

OWEN, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.