Case ID: sw3d_510/html/0901-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alon MONIGAN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    ED 103821
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    Filed: February 21, 2017
    
      Jessica Hathaway, St. Louis, MO, for Movant/Appellant.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alón Monigan appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Burston v. State, 343 S.W.3d 691, 693 (Mo.App. E.D. 2011). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b). 
      
      . Mo. R. Crim. P. 2015.