Case ID: ohio-cc_18/html/0875-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Swing, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(First Circuit — Hamilton Co., O., Circuit Court
    Jan. Term, 1899.)
    Before Smith, Swing and Cox, JJ.
    KNECHT v. THE CITY OF CINCINNATI.
    
      Intention to improve street — Notice—
    The plaintiff in this case sought to set aside the assessment against his property for the improvement of Beeckman street on the ground that he received no notice of the intention to improve, and he had”no knowledge of the aotual improvement.
    
      Peck & Shafer, for Plaintiff.
    
      Corporation counsel, contra.
   Swing, J.

The question raised in this case was determined in Schmidt v. Elmwood Place, 15 O. 0., 851. And after hearing the argument in this oase, and considering the authorities cited, we adhere to the ruling then made, and judgment will be entered in this case accordingly.