Case ID: ad_268/html/0802-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Florence C. Titus, Respondent, v. Travelers Insurance Company, Appellant.
   The action is to recover on a policy of accident insurance issued by defendant. There is no dispute as to the material facts. Plaintiff is the widow of the insured and the beneficiary named in the policy. The claimed accident occurred on January 25, 1943, and the insured died on February 10, 1943. Notice of death was given to defendant on June 7 or June 14, 1943. The policy provided that the insurer shall have the right and opportunity to make an autopsy ” and also provided that written notice given within thirty days of any accident shall be deemed sufficient, unless the notice as herein specified may be shown not to have been reasonably possible.” On July 2, 1943, defendant demanded permission to make an autopsy on the body of the insured and plaintiff refused. The failure of plaintiff to comply with the condition precedent, in that she refused to allow the autopsy, bars any recovery under the policy. (Dvorkin v. Commercial Travelers Mut. Accident Assn., 258 App. Div. 501, affd. 283 N. Y. 629; Gould v. Travelers Insurance Co., 244 App. Div. 274, affd. 270 N. Y. 584.) Assuming that plaintiff did not know of the existence of the policy until March 5, 1943, her failure to give notice to the insurer of the claimed accident and death until June 7, 1943, prevents the enforcement of the policy. (MacKay v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 281 N. Y. 42; Walterman v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Assn., 260 App. Div. 478.) Order denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Close, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ., concur.