Case ID: tex-civ-app_21/html/0344-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "KEY, Associate Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company v. T. M. Dinwiddie.
    Decided May 31, 1899.
    Railway — Station Agent — Contract to Furnish Cars.
    A railway company is not bound by the contract of its agent at one station to furnish cars for shipping at another station, in the absence of authority on the part of the agent to make such contract, or of notice to and ratification by the company.
    Appeal from the County Court of Tom Green. Tried below before Hon. T. C. Wynn.
    
      Chas. E. Lee and J. W. Terry, for appellant.
    Ho briefs for appellee were on file.
   KEY, Associate Justice.

This is an action brought by appellee to recover from appellant dmages for breach of a contract to furnish appellee cars and transport for him twenty-nine carloads of wood from Bangs station, on appellant’s railroad, in Brown County, to San Angelo, in Tom Green County.

The undisputed evidence shows that the contract sued upon was made with appellant’s station agent at San Angelo; that said agent had no authority to make contracts for appellant for cars to be furnished at Bangs, or any station other than San Angelo; that he did not report to appellant any contract or agreement made by him to furnish cars to appellee at Bangs station; that appellant had no notice of any such contract with said agent, and did not ratify such contract.

Under these facts, it must be held that the contract sued upon was not binding upon appellant. Railway v. Belcher, 32 S. W. Rep., 518, same case, 35 S. W. Rep., 6; Railway v. Hodge, 10 Texas Civ. App., 543.

The case appears to have been fully developed, and as upon the undisputed facts appellee has no cause of action against appellant, the judgment of the County Court will reversed and judgment here rendered for appellant.

Reversed and rendered.