Case ID: f2d_35/html/1015-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James ARBOGAST, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    November 18, 1929.
    No. 2917.
    William T. George, of Philippi, W. Va., for appellant.
    Russell L. Furbee, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Fairmont, W. Va. (Arthur Arnold, U. S. Atty., of Piedmont, W. Va., on the brief), for the United States.
    Before WADDILL and PARKER, Circuit Judges, and SOPER, District Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

After a careful consideration of the record herein, we do not think that any of the assignments of error has sufficient merit to justify discussion. The question in the case was a question of fact, which has been resolved against defendant by the jury. There- was no error in the rulings of the court, and its judgment will accordingly be affirmed.

Affirmed.