Case ID: ohio-st-3d_70/html/0487-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Moyer, C.J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lance et al., Appellants, v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Appellee.
    [Cite as Lance v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 487.]
    
      (No. 94-998
    Submitted August 31, 1994
    Decided October 5, 1994.)
    
      Elk & Elk Co., L.P.A., Todd 0. Rosenberg and David J. Elk, for appellants.
    
      Rhoa, Folien & Rawlin Co., L.P.A., Ronald V. Rawlin and James H. Crawford, for appellee.
   The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 639 N.E.2d 438, decided today.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., concurs separately.

Wright, J., dissents for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions in Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 485-486, 639 N.E.2d 438, 443.

Moyer, C.J.,

concurring separately. I concur separately in the judgment entry in the above-styled case. As my dissent in Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 485, 639 N.E.2d 438, 443, stated, I do not agree with the law announced in the majority decision. Nevertheless, it is the law on the issue in the above-styled case. As I believe all parties should receive equal application of the law announced by this court, and only for that reason, I concur in the judgment entry.