Case ID: sw3d_350/html/0069-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cristle D. MARTIN, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Joel R. MARTIN, Respondent/Appellant.
    No. ED 96095.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Oct. 11, 2011.
    Lawrence G. Gillespie, Clayton, MO, Dennis L. Beckley, Hazelwood, MO, for Petitioner/Respondent.
    Mark R. Harford, Kirkwood, MO, For Respondent/Appellant.
    Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joel R. Martin appeals from the trial court’s Order and Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage dissolving his marriage to Cristle D. Martin. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Zalmanoff v. Zalma-noff, 862 S.W.2d 941, 944 (Mo.App. E.D. 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).