Case ID: f-appx_380/html/0337-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael Richard D’ALESSANDRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND; Suzyk Malagary; John Doe, Case Manager; Grant Clark, Property Manager, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 10-6296.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 20, 2010.
    Decided: May 28, 2010.
    Michael Richard D’Alessandro, Appellant pro se. Patricia Lisehora Kane, County Attorney’s Office, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Richard D’Alessandro appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. D’Alessandro v. Montgomery County, No. 8:09-cv00190-PJM (D. Md. filed Jan. 20, 2009; entered Jan. 21, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.