Case ID: mich_8/html/0099-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James D. Franklin v. James P. Mansfield.
    Notice of Hearing. What is sufficient.
    
      Heard and Decided April 21st.
    Error to Wayne Circuit.
    
      A. Russell, moved to strike this cause from the docket for the want of a proper notice of hearing. The following is a copy of the notice:
    “ State of Michigan. In the Supreme Court for the state of Michigan. James D. Franklin, plaintiff in error v. James P. Mansfield, defendant in error. Detroit, March 2'7, 1860. Sir: .Take notice that the above entitled cause will be brought on for hearing and argument, at the next term of said Court, to be held at the city of Detroit.
    Tours &c.,
    Moore & Blackmar, Att’ys for Deft in error.
    
    To Messrs. Walker & Rvssell, Atty's for Plff. in error.”
    
    Mr. Russell claimed that the notice failed to comply with the rules in three particulars:
    1. It does not show to what clerk’s office the papers were originally returned: Rule 43. 2. It does not name the term at which it is designed to bring the cause to a hearing. 3. It is not a notice of hearing for the first day of the term: Rule 25.
    
    
      W. A. Moore., contra.
   The Coukt held the notice sufficient.