Case ID: njl_98/html/0249-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

EMIL ALBRECHT, RESPONDENT, v. ALBIN THIEME, APPELLANT.
    Argued June 28, 1922
    Decided October 6, 1922.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 97 N. J. L. 103.
    For the respondent, J. Vincent Barnitt.
    
    For the appellant, Ward & McGinnis.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justiee Katzenbach in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance— Vim Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, White, Heppenheimee, Williams, Gardner, Ackebson, Yan Buskirk, JJ. 12.

For reversal — TJone.