Case ID: ohio-st-3d_74/html/0218-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanley.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanley (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 218.]
    (No. 95-1672
    Submitted September 27, 1995
    Decided January 10, 1996.)
    
      
      Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
   Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(5), 1-102(A)(6), and 6-101(A)(3), as well as Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D), V(4)(G), and VI. We also agree with the sanction recommended for this misconduct. Respondent is therefore permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.