Case ID: sw3d_99/html/0060-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cedric KEEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 81259.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Feb. 25, 2003.
    Gwenda R. Robinson, Assistant State Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Nicole Gorovsky, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, SR. J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cedric Keel (“Movant”) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. Movant claims his counsel was ineffective. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court’s determination that movant’s claims are refuted by the record is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We affirm the judgment for the reasons set forth in the motion court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b).