Case ID: f-appx_21/html/0674-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Arturo RAMIREZ-DIAZ, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 01-10012.
    D.C. No. CR-00-01048-EHC.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 15, 2001.
    
    Decided Oct. 24, 2001.
    Before REINHARDT, GRABER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jose Arturo Ramirez-Diaz appeals his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

As part of his plea agreement, Ramirez-Diaz waived his right to appeal his sentence. Because Ramirez-Diaz received a sentence within the applicable Sentencing Guideline range and there is no evidence that the waiver of the right to appeal was not knowing or was not voluntary, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. United States v. Aguilar-Muniz, 156 F.3d 974, 976 (9th Cir.1998).

Because our independent review of the record discloses no further arguable issues, counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted and the appeal is

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.