Case ID: nys_135/html/1140-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RYCROFT v. PIERCE.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    May 31, 1912.)
    Action by Alice O. Rycroft against Henry O. Pierce.
   PER CURIAM.

Order (135 N. Y. Supp. 447) resettled, by adding to it the following clause: “Without prejudice to an application at Special Term for leave to renew the motion to open the default, upon satisfactory proof that the defendant was unable to come to New York to be present at the trial of the case, and that he has a defense on the merits.”