Case ID: f-appx_4/html/0524-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sandra DANIELS; Timothy Marsolf, Lead Relator and on behalf of all relators; Gary Haugen; George C. Stone; Terry L. Perkins; William W. McCoy, Jr.; John T. Davis; Tod J. Callahan; Shawn M. Newcomb; William J. Adams; David R. Taylor; David L. Robins; Teddy G. Dummire; David E. Hart; Clayton L. Howard; David W. Tribett, Plaintiffs, and Keith Christenson; Robert W. Johnston; Neil D. Pake; Scott R. Smith; David R. Durham; Robert A. Collins; Mark S. Huesser; Richard Grooms; Terry J. Staley, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bill COGSWELL; Ira Blalock; Elizabeth Browne; Chalmers Jones; Elizabeth L. Taylor, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 00-35299.
    D.C. No. CV-79-0651-HA.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 12, 2001.
    
    Decided Feb. 23, 2001.
    Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      . The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument and denies appellants’ request for oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Nine Oregon state prisoners appeal pro se the district court’s order denying their various post-judgment motions, including motions to reactivate a 1979 judgment to bring in new claims.

We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order filed on February 17, 2000.

AFFIRMED. 
      
      . This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.