Case ID: nj-misc_3/html/1041-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pek Cuhiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BOROUGH OF LINDEN, NOW CITY OF LINDEN, PLAINTIFF, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, DEFENDANT.
    Decided October 19, 1925.
    On rule for new trial.
    Before Gummeke, Cliiee Justice^ and Justices Kalisch and Campbell.
    For the plaintiff, Whittemore & McLean.
    
    For the defendant, Frank O. Turner.
    
   Pek Cuhiam.

This was a suit upon a bond given to secure the faithful performance of a sewer construction contract.

Plaintiff has a judgment upon verdict for $1,347.63, and defendant has a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside and a new trial granted, assigning several reasons therefor, our examination of which leads us to the conclusion that the verdict should not be disturbed.

The rule to show cause is discharged, with costs.