Case ID: ga_123/html/0295-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Candler, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gray v. Wright.
    Submitted April 20,
    Decided June 15, 1905.
    Petition for injunction. Before Judge Fite. Murray superior court. January 21, 1905.
    
      H. A. Langston and G. G Glenn, for plaintiff.
   Candler, J.

1. A consent decree will not be set aside because, “ through accident and mistake,” one of the consenting parties failed to introduce evidence which was in his possession and which might, if submitted on a trial, have resulted in the rendition of a decree different from the one which was taken by consent.

2. It is not error to refuse to entertain a petition to enjoin the cutting of timber on land which, by a decree to which the plaintiff consented, has been legally adjudged to be the property of the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Simmons, C. J., absent.