Case ID: nw2d_925/html/0880-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN RE ESTATE OF Richard T. GORDON.
    Michael G. Gordon, Appellant, v. Kathleen L. Gordon-Beatty, Justin A. Gordon, and Kelsey A. Gordon, Appellees, and Laureen M. Gordon, Stacy L. David, Nicole M. Gordon, Melissa J. Gordon, Huntington National Bank, and J. Russell Labarge, Jr., Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Richard T. Gordon,Other Parties.
    In re Richard T. Gordon Revocable Trust Agreement.
    Huntington Bank, Laureen M. Gordon, and J. Russell Labarge, Jr., Successor Trustee of the Richard T. Gordon Revocable Trust Agreement, Other Parties, and Justin A. Gordon, Kathleen L. Gordon-Beatty, and Kelsey A. Gordon, Appellees, v. Michael G. Gordon, Appellant.
    In re Laureen M. Gordon Revocable Trust.
    Kathleen L. Gordon-Beatty, Justin A. Gordon, And Kelsey A. Gordon, Appellees, and Fairlane Tool Company, Inc., Douglas Dold, Dold Spath & Kriazis, P.C., Philip E. Bertelsen, Nicole M. Gordon, Stacy L. David, Melissa J. Hessell, Theresa L. Hunrath, John R. Gordon, Julie Gordon, Huntington Bank, and J. Russell Labarge, Jr., Successor Trustee of the Laureen M. Gordon Revocable Trust, Other Parties, v. Michael G. Gordon, Appellant.
    In re Estate of Laureen M. Gordon.
    Michael G. Gordon, Appellant, v. Kathleen L. Gordon-Beatty, Justin A. Gordon, And Kelsey A. Gordon, Appellees, and Stacy L. David, Nicole M. Gordon, Melissa J. Gordon, and J. Russell Labarge, Jr., Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Laureen M. Gordon, Other Parties.
    SC: 158843 SC: 158844 SC: 158845 SC: 158846 COA: 339296 COA: 339297 COA: 339299 COA: 339320
    Supreme Court of Michigan.
    April 30, 2019
    Order
   On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 8, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.