Case ID: so2d_561/html/1356-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert CREED, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 88-03472.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    June 6, 1990.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the finding of the trial court that appellant violated the terms and conditions of his probation, as well as the sentence imposed therefor. However, the order of violation must be corrected to reflect that appellant was found guilty of violating condition 5 (commission of a new offense), not conditions 1 (failure to submit written reports) and 2 (failure to pay cost of supervision). Appellant was acquitted of these two technical violations.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.