Case ID: so2d_435/html/0421-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DENNIS, Justice,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frances Radosta De Felice, wife of and Stephen J. DE FELICE v. Herbert J. GARON and Rufus M. Carimi.
    No. 66993.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Aug. 9, 1983.
   DENNIS, Justice,

concurring.

I respectfully concur.

Because the record in this case has been found insufficient to support partial summary judgment in plaintiff’s favor, I concur in the remand to the trial court. Since I believe that the validity vel non of the “voting trust” contract is likely to retain significance in plaintiff’s claim for damages, I cannot fully endorse the majority’s treatment of the mootness issue. I must point out that this court has not ruled on the validity of the contract, and if trial proceeds on plaintiff’s claim for damages for wrongful interference, the trial court is not bound to uphold it.