Case ID: f-appx_583/html/0370-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Francisco SIERRA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-40773
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Oct. 27, 2014.
    Katherine Lisa Haden, Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Yolanda Evette Jarmon, Esq., Law Office of Yolanda Jarmon, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Francisco Sierra challenges the 200-month term of imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute approximately 1,234 kilograms of marijuana. As in the district court, Sierra contends that he was entitled to a mitigating role adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 because his role in the offense was limited to driving a tractor-trailer containing marijuana. Additionally, Sierra contends that, in denying a role reduction, the district court improperly considered his prior criminal convictions as relevant conduct.

The role adjustments of § 3B1.2 are not available to defendants sentenced under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. See United States v. Cashaw, 625 F.3d 271, 274 (5th Cir.2010). Because Sierra’s offense level was calculated under § 4B1.1, we find no error. See id.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.