Case ID: njl_83/html/0639-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MATTIE STOUT, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. EDISON PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted March 25, 1912
    Decided June 20, 1912.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 53 Vroom 133.
    Bor the plaintiff in error, William II. Morrow and Robert II. McCarter.
    
    Bor the defendant in error, William C. Gebhardt.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Yoorhees in that court.

For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Ykedenwrgh, Yroom, Congdon, White, Treacy, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Kone.