Case ID: ga-app_213/html/0763-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "McMurray, Presiding Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

A94A0908.
    SOUTHEAST REDUCING COMPANY, INC. et al. v. WASSERMAN.
    (445 SE2d 859)
   McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff Wasserman filed this breach of contract action against defendants Southeast Reducing Company, Inc., James Matthews, and Nancy Matthews. Subsequently, plaintiff filed his motion for summary judgment. Defendants filed their response, including a timely request for oral argument as to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 6.3 of the Uniform Rules for the Superior Courts. The superior court entered an order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment without setting a hearing date or conducting a hearing on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Defendants appeal and raise in their first enumeration of error the failure of the superior court to conduct a hearing, as requested, upon plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Held:

Decided July 6, 1994.

Lovett & Hicks, William E. Hicks, for appellants.

Friedman & Montalto, Steven Montalto, Jill A. Barker, for appellee.

It was clearly erroneous for the superior court to fail to afford defendants the opportunity to oppose plaintiff’s motion by oral argument. Kelley v. First Franklin Financial Corp., 256 Ga. 622 (351 SE2d 443). We have previously rejected plaintiff’s suggestion that a harmless error analysis is applicable to these circumstances. Dixon v. McClain, 204 Ga. App. 531 (420 SE2d 66).

Judgment reversed.

Pope, C. J., and Smith, J., concur.