Case ID: so2d_533/html/0938-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rosemary SERAFINO, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, Appellee.
    No. 88-479.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 22, 1988.
    Whitelock and Moldof and Charles T. Whitelock, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    Karen A. Brodeen, Tallahassee, for ap-pellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon the joint stipulation of the parties, the order of January 24, 1988, is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the appellee for a new administrative hearing.