Case ID: ny-2d_9/html/0889-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Claim of Ethel Domash, Respondent, v. Standard Coat, Apron and Linen Service et al., Appellants, and Special Funds Conservation Committee, Respondent. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.
    Argued April 18, 1961;
    decided April 27, 1961.
    
      
      Bernard F. Farley for appellants.
    
      Louis J. Lefhowits, Attorney-General (Daniel Polanshy, Paxton Blair and Boy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen’s Compensation Board, respondent.
    
      John M. Cullen for Special Funds Conservation Committee, respondent.
    
      Abraham Marhhoff for claimant-respondent.
   Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Ftjld, Froessel, Burke and Foster. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the ground that it is not based on any accident within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.