Case ID: f3d_319/html/1079-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Elaine R. MANGINI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Defendant, and Dick Gottsegen, dba Timberline Adventures, aka Timberline Bicycle Tours, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 01-35273.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Nov. 4, 2002.
    Filed Jan. 9, 2003.
    Amended Feb. 10, 2003.
    Sue Ann Love, Jardine, Stephenson, Blewett & Weaver, P.C., Great Falls, MT, for the defendant-appellant.
    Francis X. Clinch, Jardine, Stephenson, Blewett & Weaver, P.C., Great Falls, MT, for the defendant-appellant.
    Joseph P. Cosgrove, Hoyt & Blewett, Great Falls, MT, for the plaintiff-appellee.
    Before: TROTT, NELSON and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

The Opinion filed January 9, 2003, is amended as follows:

At Slip Opinion page 227, line 33: delete footnote 2, and replace with a new footnote 2 stating, “Because of the additional evidence that has come to light, we need not consider whether we would reach a different result were we reviewing Judge Malloy’s decision on the record before him.”
At Slip Opinion page 227, line 25 [after sentence “We also note that the record of Jackson’s contacts with the expert is incomplete .... ”]: add the following sentence, “As the record stands, we find no direct evidence of an intent to deceive Judge Molloy, but nevertheless, Jackson clearly acted as a lawyer in the proceeding and Hoyt & Blewett failed to disclose all the relevant facts.”

With these amendments to the Opinion, the panel has unanimously voted to deny appellee’s petition for a rehearing.