Case ID: so2d_625/html/0081-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David MISHLER, et al., Appellants, v. Richard ZAKHEIM, M.D., et al., Appellees.
    No. 92-2499.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Sept. 28, 1993.
    Rehearing Denied Oct. 29, 1993.
    Ward & Caggiano, Karen J. Haas, Miami, for appellants.
    Burt E. Redlus, James C. Blecke, Blackwell & Walker and James E. Tribble, Miami, George V. Lanza, Coral Gables, Magill & Lewis and Fred Lewis, Miami, for appellees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and NESBITT, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Because we find clear error in the trial court’s exclusion of the testimony of the plaintiffs’ proposed expert witnesses under section 766.102, Florida Statutes (1991), the summary judgment entered below on that basis is reversed and the cause is remanded for trial as to all defendants.