Case ID: sw3d_514/html/0061-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Angelique M. DAILY, Petitioner/Appellant, v. James E. DAILY, IV, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 104218
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    Filed: March 21, 2017
    
      Nathan S. Cohen, 210 S. Bemiston Avenue, Clayton, MO 63105, for For Petitioner/Appellant.
    Mary Ann Weems, 7751 Carondelet Avenue, Suite 505, Clayton, MO 63105, for For Respondent/Respondent.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Angelique M. Daily appeals from the trial court’s Memorandum, Order and Amended Judgment dissolving her marriage to James E. Daily, IV. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the trial court was supported by substantial evidence, was not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law. Ulreich v. Kreutz, 876 S.W.2d 726, 728 (Mo. App. E.D. 1994); Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc. 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).