Case ID: sw3d_307/html/0228-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Terry E. WASHINGTON, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 93359.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    April 6, 2010.
    Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Dora A. Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terry E. Washington appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion under Rule 29.15 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) Mo. R. Civ. P. 2009. 
      
      . All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2009, unless otherwise indicated.