Case ID: f2d_374/html/0109-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. PITTSBURGH NATIONAL BANK, a Corporation.
    No. 16035.
    United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
    Argued Jan. 17, 1967.
    Decided Feb. 9, 1967.
    
      Harry W. Miller, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Thomas Levendos, Royston, Robb, Leonard, Edgecombe & Miller, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
    Thomas M. Kerr, Jr., Pittsburgh, Pa. (Richard B. Tucker, Jr., Edward A. Mihalik, Patterson, Crawford, Arensberg & Dunn, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
    Before HASTIE, GANEY and SEITZ, Circuit Judges.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from summary judgment entered for the defendant after these facts were established without contradiction. An employee of the plaintiff, May Department Stores Co., fraudulently caused the plaintiff to draw its checks payable to fictitious suppliers. The wrongdoing employee then forged the endorsements of the fictitious payees, cashed the checks at the defendant bank and converted the proceeds. The bank charged the sums thus paid against the plaintiff’s account.

The plaintiff then sued the bank for illegally charging its account with amounts paid on forged endorsements. On the record before it, and in the absence of any allegation or showing of countervailing circumstances by the plaintiff, the district court properly concluded that the bank was protected by the following provision of the Uniform Commercial Code as in force in Pennsylvania.

“(1) An indorsement by any person in the name of a named payee is effective if
******
(c) an agent or employee of the drawer has supplied him with the name of the payee intending the latter to have no such interest.” 12A P.S. § 3-405(1) (c).

The judgment will be affirmed.