Case ID: f-appx_346/html/0197-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gloria Lucia SALMERON SANCHEZ; et al., Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 04-71689.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 14, 2008.
    
    Filed Sept. 17, 2009.
    Konrad K. Larson, Anaheim, CA, for Petitioners.
    Gloria Lucia Salmerón Sanchez, Apple Valley, CA, pro se.
    Richard M. Evans, Esquire, Assistant Director, Susan Houser, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
    Before: HALL, O’SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Gloria Lucia Salmerón Sanchez, her husband J. Baudelio Barrera Guzman, and their three sons, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“U”) order denying the parents’ applications for cancellation of removal. We deny the petition for review.

Petitioners do not challenge the IJ’s denial of their applications for cancellation of removal. Instead, they request that their case be remanded so that Barrera Guzman can apply for adjustment of status. We deny petitioners’ request.

Petitioners’ challenge to the BIA’s decision to streamline their case is foreclosed by Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 855 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.