Case ID: so2d_670/html/0977-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel ECKHART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 95-1381.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Jan. 8, 1996.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; James W. Rogers, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

After careful review of the record in this Anders appeal from a plea of nolo contende-re, having found nothing that would arguably constitute reversible error, we affirm the conviction and sentence for violation of probation. We remand, however, to the trial court for entry of a written order of violation of probation, because none appears in the record. See Wood v. State, 653 So.2d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Wiggers v. State, 652 So.2d 1294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Benton v. State, 652 So.2d 1288 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

BOOTH, JOANOS and BENTON, JJ., concur.