Case ID: ad2d_228/html/0355-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Jemrock Realty Co., Appellant, v Lula Anderson et al., Respondents.
    [644 NYS2d 263]
   The rent reductions were imposed for service reductions, including an inoperative elevator, a defective fire door and improperly weather-sealed and non-maintained windows. The factual issues raised by petitioner were for the administrative agency to resolve, and the record reveals that the challenged determination of the agency has a rational basis and was not arbitrary and capricious (see, Matter of 230 E. 52nd St. Assocs. v State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 131 AD2d 349).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Rubin and Williams, JJ.