Case ID: sw3d_125/html/0333-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rakesh N. PATEL, Petitioner/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE FOR the STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 82400.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Jan. 6, 2004.
    Carl M. Ward, Clayton, MO, for appellant.
    Kevin A. Nelson, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rakesh N. Patel appeals the trial court’s judgment upholding the Director of Revenue’s suspension of his driver’s license pursuant to Section 302.505 RSMo (2001 Supp.). We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).