Case ID: ga_184/html/0698-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "I-Iutcheson, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harden v. The State.
    No. 11903.
    September 15, 1937.
    <7. E. Anderson, for plaintiff in error.
    
      M. J. Yeomans, attorney-general, W. G. Neville, solicitor-general, Ellis G. Arnall, and E. J. Glower, contra.
   I-Iutcheson, Justice.

1. The alleged newly discovered evidence set out in the only special ground of the motion for new trial is not such as would probably produce a different result on another trial of the case.

2. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict, and the court did not-err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Beck, P. J., and Bell, J., absent because of illness.