Case ID: app-dc_34/html/0198-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Chief Justice Shepard", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

COSPER v. GOLD. (2)
    This case is governed by- the decision of the Court in Cosper v. Gold, ante, page 194.
    No. 600.
    Patent Appeals.
    Submitted November 17, 1909.
    Decided December 7, 1909.
    
      Hearing on an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an interference case.
    
      Appeal dismissed.-
    
    
      Mr. Charles Necuve and Mr. Robert N. Pierson for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Otto R. Barnett for the appellee.
   Mr. Chief Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court:

. This .is a branch of the main case No. 599, and presents - a like question as to the right to appeal from an interlocutory order dissolving an interference. For the reasons given in No. 599 (Cosper v. Gold, ante, 194) the appeal must be dismissed.

It is so ordered, and that this decision be certified to the Commissioner of Patents. Appeal dismissed.