Case ID: pa-super_217/html/0387-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam, Hoffman, J.:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Commonwealth v. Pugh, Appellant.
    Submitted June 8, 1970.
    Before Wright, P. J., Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, and Cercone, JJ.
    
      
      David Rudovsky and John W. Packel, Assistant Defenders, and Vincent J. Ziccardi, Acting Defender, for appellant.
    
      Joan B. Duncan, Assistant District Attorney, James D. Crawford, Deputy District Attorney, Richard A. Sprague, First Assistant District Attorney, and Arlen Specter, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
    November 13, 1970:
   Opinion

Per Curiam,

Order affirmed.

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by

Hoffman, J.:

Appellant’s convictions on indictment Nos. 409-411, January Term, 1962 raise a question identical in all respects with the appeal in Commonwealth v. Mills, 217 Pa. Superior Ct. 269, 269 A. 2d 322 (1970). For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in that case, I would vacate judgment of sentence and discharge appellant on these charges.