Case ID: nev_91/html/0407-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DOROTHY (STRUTZEL) CROCKETT, Appellant, v. EAGLE THRIFTY DRUGS & MARKETS, INC., Respondent.
    No. 7467
    June 18, 1975
    536 P.2d 490
    
      Charles E. Springer, Ltd., of Reno, for Appellant.
    
    
      Hibbs & Bullís, Ltd., of Reno, for Respondent.
    
      
       The case was presented in the district court by Howard W. McKis-sick, Jr., for plaintiff Crockett.
    
   OPINION

Per Curiam:

In this “slip and fall” personal injury action, the jury, upon conflicting evidence, returned a verdict for the defendant. In the factual context of this case, we perceive no prejudicial error in the district court’s rulings on evidence and instructions to the jury, and accordingly we affirm. See American Cas. Co. v. Propane Sales & Serv., 89 Nev. 398, 513 P.2d 1226 (1973); Ginnis v. Mapes Hotel, 86 Nev. 408, 470 P.2d 135 (1970); Eldorado Club, Inc., v. Francis B. Graff, 78 Nev. 507, 377 P.2d 174 (1962); Yturralde v. Barney’s Club, Inc., 87 Nev. 249, 484 P.2d 1079 (1971).