Case ID: f-appx_23/html/0176-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard David COOPER; George Wilson; John Trippett; James Britton; Kenney Edwards; William Young; Henry Davis; Gary Bright; Gregory Hamilton; Charles Hill; Anthony Pressberry; Brian Stokeling; Irvin Burns, Jr.; Thomas Mattingly; Vincin Harpster; Henry Harris; Jesse Cobbs; Jonathan Bork; John Carter; Charles Wright; William Baker El; Lowell D. Howell; Donald Fitzgerald Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Everette Pratt, Plaintiff, v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICE, INCORPORATED; Pharmacy Services, Incorporated; Maryland Division of Correction, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 01-6964.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 12, 2001.
    Decided Jan. 11, 2002.
    Richard David Cooper, George Wilson, John Trippett, James Britton, Kenney Edwards, William Young, Henry Davis, Gary Bright, Gregory Hamilton, Charles Hill, Anthony Pressberry, Brian Stokeling, Irvin Burns, Jr., Thomas Mattingly, Vincin Harpster, Henry Harris, Jesse Cobbs, Jonathan Bork, John Carter, Charles Wright, William Baker El, Lowell D. Howell, Donald Fitzgerald, Appellants Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the district court’s order dismissing their 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) medical treatment claim. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Further, we decline to review Appellants’ claims raised for the first time on appeal. See Muth, v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Cooper v. Prison Health Servs ., No. CA-01-1428-S (D.Md. May 23, 2001). We deny Appellants’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.