Case ID: f-appx_98/html/0252-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Christopher LANGDON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T.L. MALONE; Jerry Brewer; Ed Green, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 03-2493.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 27, 2004.
    Decided: June 2, 2004.
    Christopher Langdon, Appellant pro se.
    Robert Orr Crawford, III, North Carolina Department of Justice, Lisa Carol Glover, North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Christopher Langdon appeals from the district court’s order denying his post-judgment motions to compel discovery and to recuse. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Langdon v. Malone, No. CA-02-189-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 2003). We deny Appellees’ motion for sanctions. We deny Langdon’s motion to consolidate, motion to extend time to file a response to Appellees’ motion for sanctions, and motion to strike Appellees’ motion for sanctions. We also deny Lang-don’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED