Case ID: ohio-st-3d_45/html/0088-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cuyahoga County Bar Association v. Gerstenslager.
    [Cite as Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Gerstenslager (1989), 45 Ohio St. 3d 88.]
    (No. 89-252
    Submitted May 30, 1989
    Decided August 16, 1989.)
    
      
      Spangenberg, Shibley, Traci & Lancione, Peter H. Weinberger, Sindell, Ruibenstein, Einbund, Pavlik & Novak and William J. Novak, for relator.
    
      Ward, Marein & Gillette, Patrick J. Carroll, Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley & Howley and Thomas C. Buford, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We concur with the board’s findings and recommendations. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.