Case ID: f3d_10/html/0753-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Helene Donna ALPERT, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl Henry ALPERT, Defendant-Appellant.
    Nos. 91-8957, 91-9034.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Dec. 13, 1993.
    Alan J. Baverman, Atlanta, GA, for defendant-appellant.
    Martin J. Weinstein, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, GA, for plaintiff-appellee in No. 91-8957.
    Donald F. Samuel, Garland & Samuel, P.C., Atlanta, GA, for defendant-appellant.
    Martin James Weinstein, Asst. U.S. Atty., Joe D. Whitley, U.S. Atty., Atlanta, GA, for plaintiff-appellee in No. 91-9034.
    Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, and FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.
   ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this ease should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.