Case ID: f_112/html/0633-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO. v. DAVIS.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    December 13, 1901.)
    No. 66.
    Ai’peau—-Review—Discbbtionaky Rulings.
    Tlie action of a trial court in denying a motion to open a default is not subject to review unless an abuse of discretion is clearly shown.
    In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern-District of New York.
    
      On Application to Review Order Denying Motion to Open Default.
    Theodore H. Lark, for plaintiff in error.
    Geo. C. l3odine, for defendant in error.
    Before WALLACE~, Circuit Judge, and TOWNSEND, District Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed in open court on authority of Means v. Bank, 146 U. S. 620, 13 Sup. Ct. 186, 36 L. Ed. 1107; Isaacs v. U. S., 159 U. S. 487, 16 Sup. Ct. 51, 40 L. Ed. 229; Goldsby v. U. S., 160 U. S. 70, 16 Sup. Ct. 216, 40 L. Ed. 343.