Case ID: ala-app_23/html/0674-09.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BRICKEN,'P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(127 So. 926)
    Hub SISK v. STATE.
    8 Div. 928.
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    March 18, 1930.
    O. M. Rains, of Scottsboro, for appellant.
    Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.
   BRICKEN,'P. J.

From a judgment of conviction for the offense of 'carrying a concealed pistol about his person, this appeal was taken.

Upon the trial, a question of fact only was involved. In our opinion the evidence adduced was ample to justify the jury in returning the verdict of guilty.

No question of law of sufficient import to require the consideration of this court appears to be involved.

The record is regular, and, as the trial prqceeded throughout without prejudicial error, . the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed. •

Affirmed.