Case ID: njl_135/html/0205-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MAUDE ZEMETRA ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. FENCHEL REALTY CO., INC., RESPONDENT.
    Submitted October 25, 1946
    Decided January 17, 1947.
    For the appellants, Alfred Brenner.
    
    For the respondent. Wall, Haighl, Carey & Hartpence, and Gerald F. O’Mara.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review heroin is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice ('ase in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, McGeehan. McLean. JJ. 13.

For reversal — ’None.