Case ID: ny_137/html/0595-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Andrews, Ch. J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eliza M. Sloane, Respondent, v. The New York Elevated Railroad Company et al., Appellants.
    (Argued February 6, 1893;
    decided February 28, 1893.)
    Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made February 24,1892, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
    • The following is the mem. handed down in this case : “ We think this judgment should be reversed on the principle of the opinions in Sutro et a. v. Manhattan Railway Company
      
       and Bookman v. Same, decided at this term, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide event.”
    
      Arthur O. Townsend, for appellants.
    
      Charles A. B. Pratt, Jr., for respondent.
    
      
      
         Ante, page 592.
    
    
      
      
        Ante, page 302.
    
   Andrews, Ch. J.,

reads mem. for reversal and new trial.

All concur.

Judgment reversed.