Case ID: sw3d_113/html/0241-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Steven BANKHEAD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 81627.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Aug. 19, 2003.
    Stacy F. Sullivan, Public Defender, Ma-leaner R. Harvey, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    John Munson Morris, III, Assistant Attorney General, Nicole E. Gorovsky, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Steven Bankhead, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits without an evidentiary hearing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value.

However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).