Case ID: so2d_365/html/0229-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "TATE, J., DIXON, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joel T. CHAISSON v. Lanny THOMAS, Charles A. Ferguson, Walter G. Cowan, Ashton Phelps, and the Times-Picayune Publishing Corp.
    No. 63320.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Dec. 1, 1978.
   In re: Defendants-Respondents applying for rehearing.

Application for rehearing denied.

TATE, J.,

concurs. Our writ grant was obviously designed to permit the trial judge to rule on the merits of the plaintiff’s objection to discovery of some matters requested as unduly oppressive or as not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of relevant evidence.

DIXON, J.,

would grant a rehearing, being of the view that the writ was improvidently granted.