Case ID: f-appx_516/html/0269-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jerel SHAW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARAMARK MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 12-2344.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 28, 2018.
    Decided: April 1, 2013.
    Jerel Shaw, Appellant Pro Se. Katherine Lee Hoekman, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerel Shaw appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shaw v. Aramark Mgmt. Servs. Ltd. P’ship, No. 3:11-cv-00483-REP, 903 F.Supp.2d 413 (E.D.Va. Oct. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.