Case ID: so3d_238/html/0839-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James FORNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D17-3854
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [February 28, 2018]
    James Forney, Raiford, pro se.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

We affirm the summary denial of appellant's successive rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We write only to address appellant's claim that the orders entered after he filed a motion to disqualify the trial judge were void. This claim is meritless because appellant failed to serve the motion on the judge. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(c), (j) ; Braddy v. State , 111 So.3d 810, 833 (Fla. 2012) ; Hedrick v. State , 6 So.3d 688, 693 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Affirmed .

Warner, Ciklin and Kuntz, JJ., concur.