Case ID: nj-eq_133/html/0298-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ophelia Latorraca, complainant-appellant, v. Nicola Latorraca et al., defendants-respondents.
    [Argued February 8th, 1943.
    Decided April 30th, 1943.]
    
      Mr. Milton M. Unger, for the complainant-appellant.
    
      Messrs. Lum, Fairlie & Wachenfeld (Mr. Ralph E. hum and Mr. Joseph J. Biunno), for the respondent Joseph Latorraca.
    
      Mr. Nathan A. Whitfield, guardian, pro se.
    
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow and reported at 132 N. J. Eq. 40.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodihe, Dohges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Wells, Rafferty, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.