Case ID: so2d_247/html/0763-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jack FINEBERG and Irving Fineberg, Appellants, v. Phillip BROOKS, Appellee.
    No. 70-763.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 11, 1971.
    Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Carson & Wahl and James Knight, Miami, for appellants.
    Rosen & Rivkind, Miami Beach, for appellee.
    Before PEARSON, C. J., and BARK-DULL and SWANN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The defendant has asked that we review the evidence in view of his point on appeal that the evidence before the jury was not sufficient to sustain the verdict. In accordance with appellant’s argument, we have done as requested and find that the testimony and evidence submitted together with the reasonable inferences therefrom were sufficient to support the verdict.

Affirmed.