Case ID: f-appx_199/html/0598-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Ignacia HEREDIA-VALDEZ, aka Jose Valdes Heridia, Jose Heredia-Valdez, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 05-10374.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 21, 2006.
    
    Filed Aug. 25, 2006.
    Anne E. Mosher, Esq., USTU-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Evo A. Deeoncini, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    John D. Kaufmann, Esq., Tucson, AZ, for D efendant-Appellant.
    Before: GOODWIN, REINHARDT, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). The request for oral argument is denied.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jose Ignacia Heredia-Valdez appeals from the 48-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Heredia-Valdez contends that the appeal waiver should not be enforced because the district court abrogated the terms of the plea agreement. We conclude the district court properly calculated the offense level and criminal history based upon Heredia-Valdez’s prior convictions, and imposed a sentence within the corresponding range provided in the plea agreement. Absent any violation of the plea agreement, Heredia-Valdez’s appeal waiver must be enforced and we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Schuman, 127 F.3d 815, 818 (9th Cir.1997) (per curiam).

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.