Case ID: njl_131/html/0571-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE CO., PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY AND THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
    Argued February 2, 1944
    Decided April 13, 1944.
    For the appellant, Harrison & Roche & Darby (Thomas Glynn Walker and Robert F. Darby, of counsel).
    For the respondents, Edward P. Stout.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court, as supplemented by the opinion of this court in the ease of New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. Town of Montclair, decided this day, 131 N. J. L. 564.

For affirmance — Tin® Chancellor, Cm®® Justice, Parker, Bodine, ITelier, Perskie. Porter, Wells, Rafferty, Hague. Thompson, Dili, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Hone.