Case ID: pa-super_210/html/0067-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam, Hoffman, J.:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kozak, Appellant, v. City of Butler.
    Argued April 12,1967.
    Before Ervin, P. J., Wright, Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, and Spaulding, JJ.
    
      William C. Robinson, with him William J. Rockenstein, and Henninger & Robinson, for appellant.
    
      
      John Murrin, City Solicitor, with him Leonard I. Feldstein, Assistant City Solicitor, for City of Butler, appellee.
    June 16, 1967:
   Opinion

Per Curiam,

Judgment affirmed.

Dissenting Opinion by

Hoffman, J.:

The entry of judgment n.o.v. for the defendant in this case seems to me wholly improper. Since reinstatement of the verdict for plaintiff would also be inappropriate, Kersey Manufacturing Company v. Rozic, 422 Pa. 564, 222 A. 2d 713 (1966), I would reverse and remand for a new trial.