Case ID: white-w_1/html/0038-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Winkler, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

W. O. Deball v. R. L. James.
    (No. 773, Op. Book No. 3, p. 449.)
    Appeal from Dallas County.
   Opinion by

Winkler, J.

§ 91. Work and labor done; measure of recovery. In a suit for work and labor done, ordinarily the measure of the plaintiff’s recovery will be the value of such work and labor. If the price of the same had been agreed by the parties, then such price would be the measure of recovery.

February 2, 1881.

Reversed and remanded.