Case ID: sw3d_102/html/0559-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lawrence MYRICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 60712.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    April 22, 2003.
    Vanessa Caleb, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Patrick Morgan, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before ELLIS, C.J., and HOWARD and HARDWICK, JJ.
   Order

PER CURIAM.

Lawrence Myrick appeals from the Honorable Charles E. Atwell’s denial of his Rule 29.16 motion. He seeks vacation of his convictions and sentences for second-degree robbery and armed criminal action and remand of the underlying case for a new trial. Mr. Myrick’s sole point on appeal alleges the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 29.15 motion because trial counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel by precluding him from testifying on his own behalf.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).