Case ID: ala-app_18/html/0157-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BRICKEN, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(89 South. 846)
    ROBBINS v. STATE.
    (6 Div. 846.)
    (Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    May 17, 1921.)
    Criminal law <&wkey;1094 — Judgment affirmed in absence of bill of exceptions and error appearing in record.
    Where the record on appeal appears regular, and no error is apparent thereon, and ■where there is no bill of exceptions before the court, and the lower court has certified that no bill of exceptions has been presented, and that time prescribed therefor lias expired, the judgment must be affirmed.
    Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; William E. Fort, Judge.
    Boh Bobbins was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.
    Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.
   BRICKEN, P. J.

This defendant was convicted under the second count of an affidavit which charged that “ * * * he did keep, or have in his possession, or receive or possess, spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors, or other prohibited alcoholic liquor or beverage,” etc. Failing to pay the fine and cost, the court sentenced defendant to hard labor for the county on October 18, 1920. From the judgment and sentence he appeals. The trial judge certifies to this court that no hill of exceptions has been presented to him in this case for his approval and signature, and that the time prescribed by law for the presentation of a bill of exceptions has expired. The record appears regular, and no error is apparent thereon. It follows that the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.