Case ID: cust-ct_5/html/0353-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Keefe, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 44508.
    Protests 978254-G, etc., of M. Pressner & Co. et al. (New York).
   Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303) the Rockingham earthenware in question was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 39426 bone lemon picks were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1537.