Case ID: cow_6/html/0581-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Curia.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte Wallis.
    ALBANY,
    Feb. 1827.
    í>. B. Tallmadge, moved to make the submission to arbitrators between the relator and Holly a rule of court; and for an attachment for not performing the award, which was in favor of the relator. Performance had been demanded.
    An attachment ing^mawardon court, cannot go till the rule be served and performance demanded.
    
      G. F. Tollman, contra.
   Curia.

Take your motion to make the submission a rule of court. The application for an attachment is premature. That writ is founded on the idea that there has been a contempt of court in disobeying the rule. The party must, therefore, be served with the rule as in other cases, and obedience demanded ; and then if it be not obeyecj, an attachment goes on shewing these facts by affidavit.

Rule accordingly.