Case ID: f-appx_682/html/0193-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ottis MCGILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jon DAVID, District Attorney; Irine G. Riel, Prosecutor, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 17-6019
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 14, 2017
    Decided: March 17, 2017
    Ottis McGill, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ottis McGill appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McGill v. David, No. 5:15-ct-03079-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 7, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED 
      
       We conclude that the district court's order is final and appealable. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc'y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623-24, 629-30 (4th Cir. 2015).