Case ID: f-appx_455/html/0342-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jacob D. PEYTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. CARICO, Sergeant; R. Robinson, Defendants-Appellees, and Bryan Watson; Harvey; c/o Roberts; Scarberry, Defendants.
    No. 11-6720.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 31, 2011.
    Decided: Nov. 29, 2011.
    Jacob D. Peyton, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appel-lees.
    Before KING, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jacob D. Peyton appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Peyton’s excessive force claim in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Peyton v. Carico, No. 7:09-cv-00492-JPJ-PMS, 2011 WL 1979041 (W.D.Va. May 20, 2011). We further deny Peyton’s motion for injunctive relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.