Case ID: f-appx_695/html/0079-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Richard Daniel GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant
    No. 15-40817
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Filed August 14, 2017
    Paula Camille Offenhauser, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Richard Daniel Garcia, Pro Se
    Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and JONES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The panel entered a limited remand in this case in an opinion dated August 1, 2017. Upon receipt of the district court’s order dated August 7, 2017, the panel now files this supplement to our prior opinion. The' district court order states that the district court “did not consider new information in the Addendum to deny Garcia’s motion” for a 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) sentence reduction. The denial of the sentence reduction was based on Garcia’s past criminal history and his continued threat to public safety. Therefore, as the court did not consider the new evidence in the Addendum, there was no error. Therefore we AFFIRM the district court. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.