Case ID: pa_585/html/0044-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

887 A.2d 1238
    Mark and Elizabeth WISNISKI t/d/b/a Saturn Surplus v. BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PA, Donald Blood and Will Rineer, EMC Ins. Co. and Scott W. Ahlstrom Appeal of Brown & Brown Ins. Co. of PA, Donald Blood and Will Rineer.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Argued Dec. 5, 2005.
    Decided Dec. 21, 2005.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Superior Court is hereby VACATED. The matter is remanded to the Superior Court for reconsideration of whether a duty exists by applying the five-prong test as set forth in Althaus v. Cohen, 562 Pa. 547, 756 A.2d 1166 (2000), and for an opinion in support thereof.

Jurisdiction relinquished.

Justice NIGRO did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.