Case ID: conn-app_18/html/0808-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frank X. Lo Sacco v. Debra M. Parmelee et al.
    (6815)
    Borden, Daly and Jacobson, Js.
    Argued February 28
    decision released March 13, 1989
    
      Frank X. Lo Sacco, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).
   Per Curiam.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing this case for failure to prosecute with reasonable diligence pursuant to Practice Book § 251, and from the denial of his motion to restore the case to the docket. The court erred in dismissing the case for failure to prosecute with reasonable diligence. Thus, the motion to restore this case to the docket should have been granted by the trial court.

There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded with direction to restore the case to the docket.