Case ID: conn_245/html/0422-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROBERT PINEAU v. HOME DEPOT, INC.
    (SC 15768)
    Callahan, C. J., and Katz, Palmer, McDonald and Peters, Js.
    Argued March 26
    officially released July 14, 1998
    
      
      Max F. Brunswick, for the appellant (plaintiff).
    
      Frederick J. Trotta, Sr., with whom was Cynthia K. Sammarco, for the appellee (defendant).
   Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.

The appeal is dismissed. 
      
       We granted the plaintiffs petition for certification limited to the following issue: “Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that the plaintiff was not entitled to a jury instruction on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur?” Pineau v. Home Depot, Inc., 243 Conn. 902, 701 A.2d 332 (1997).