Case ID: pr_44/html/0528-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Hutchison", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The National City Bank of New York, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Francisco de la Torre et al., Defendants and Appellees.
    No. 5884.
    Decided February 16, 1933.
    
      Fiddler & Newsom, Jr., for appellant. J. Ramírez Santibáñez, R~ Martínez Nadal, and Luis Muñoz Morales for appellee Francisco, de la Torre. Luis Llorens Torres, and O’Neill & O’Neill for appellees A. O’Neill and Mercedes de la Torre.
   Mr. Justice Hutchison

delivered the opinion of the Court.

After further consideration of the questions discussed in the brief for appellees, we adhere to the conclusion heretofore reached that an order dissolving or refusing to dissolve an attachment is appealable. A complete answer to the argument for appellees embodied in a brief of fifty-four pages would require more time than can be given to this aspect of the case. Anything short of an exhaustive analysis of the numerous cases relied on by counsel (in order to distinguish them and to meet the argument in the brief for ap-pellees) would not serve any useful purpose.

The motion for a rehearing must be denied.