Case ID: so2d_837/html/0610-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Chris EVANS, Appellant, v. Deborah Sue HICKS and Jimmy Scott Hicks, Appellees.
    No. 5D02-1865.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Feb. 21, 2003.
    Michael M. Naughton, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
    James L. Nipper, Jacksonville, and Leanna S.A. Freeman, for Appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

The appellant appeals the grant of a summary judgment in favor of the appel-lees in connection with the appellant’s amended petition for specific performance of a contract. Since the record before the trial court reflects that the contract proposal failed to comport with Florida Statutes § 725.01, and was neither accepted, nor delivered, the summary judgment was properly rendered. Likewise, there was no error associated with the timing of the summary judgment hearing. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, C.J, SAWAYA and MONACO, JJ., concur.