Case ID: okla_160/html/0097-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "McNEILL, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RUSHING v. CARTER OIL CO. et al.
    No. 23506.
    Opinion Filed Oct. 4, 1932.
    Rehearing Denied Nov. 1, 1932.
    Emerson & Carey, for petitioner.
    J. Berry King, Atty. Gen., Robt. D. Crowe, Asst. Atty. Gen., James A. Veasey, L. G. Owen, and Eorrest M. Darrough, for respondents.
   McNEILL, J.

This is a proceeding to review an order and award of the State Industrial Commission. Attorneys for petitioner introduced their evidence before the Commission in support of their motion for further compensation on the ground of change of condition. The Commission found that the evidence was insufficient, and petitioner seeks to have this judgment reviewed. Suffice it to say that the Commission is the finder of facts. There is competent evidence to support the finding of facts, as made by tbe Commission, that the evidence was insufficient. Affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., CLARK, V. C. J., and RILEY, OULLISON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, and KORNEGAY, JJ„ concur. HEENER, J., absent.