Case ID: so2d_861/html/1145-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BROWN, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte Mario G. CENTOBIE. (In re Mario Centobie v. State of Alabama).
    1010462.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Feb. 14, 2003.
    Gail Dickonson, Pell City, for petitioner.
    William H. Pryor, Jr., atty. gen., and Regina F. Speagle, asst. atty. gen., for respondent.
   On Rehearing Ex Mero Motu

BROWN, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. Our denial of the writ should not be construed as approval of the Court of Criminal Appeals’ articulation of the cumulative-error rule in Part XVII of the opinion of that court. Centobie v. State, 861 So.2d 1111, 1143-44 (Ala.Crim.App.2001). See Ex parte Bryant, [Ms. 1990901, June 21, 2002] — So.2d -,-(Ala.2002), and Ex parte Woods, 789 So.2d 941, 942 n. 1 (Ala.2001).

ON REHEARING EX MERO MOTU: WRIT DENIED.

MOORE, C.J., and HOUSTON, SEE, LYONS, JOHNSTONE, HARWOOD, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur.