Case ID: sw3d_306/html/0196-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kevin J. FRANKLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 93029.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    March 16, 2010.
    Maleaner Harvey, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Terrence M. Messonnier, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Franklin (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his amended motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).