Case ID: wash_157/html/0697-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 22189.
    Department One.
    June 10, 1930.]
    Arthur Parsons, Respondent, v. W. F. Clark et al., Appellants.
    
    
      Rigg & Brown, Reynolds, Ballinger, Hutson & Boldt, for appellants.
    
      McAulay & Freece and LeRoy McCann, for respondent.
    
      
      Reported in 289 Pac. 22.
    
   Per Curiam.

-This is a companion case to that of Van Cello v. Clark, ante p. 321, 289 Pac. 19, the cases being before us upon one statement of facts although two transcripts were filed and the causes in this court docketed separately.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Van Cello v. Clark, supra, the judgment appealed from is reversed, with directions to grant appellants’ motion for a new trial.