Case ID: f-appx_212/html/0848-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie Chevell CAMERON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-13633
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Dec. 26, 2006.
    Spiro T. Kypreos, Pensacola, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    E. Bryan Wilson, Tallahassee, FL, for Appellee.
    Before BIRCH, CARNES and COX, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Spyro Theodore Kypreos, appointed counsel for Willie Chevell Cameron on this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cameron’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. 
      
      . Count One of the indictment, to which Cameron pled guilty, charged conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, marijuana, and methamphetamine (R.l-24). He only pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine (R.3-84 at 14, 27-28). The written judgment, however, lists the nature of the offense as conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana, cocaine, and methamphetamine. (R.l-72 at 1.) Therefore, the judgment does not correctly reflect the offense of conviction. While this error does not undermine Cameron’s conviction or affect his sentence in any way, the district court is instructed to correct the written judgment to properly describe the offense of conviction as involving only a conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine.