Case ID: johns_2/html/0480-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Foot and Litchfield against Colvin and others.
    .Amendment of a case, male on affiomission of a fact, through mistak" of the counsel.
    HOFFMAN, in behalf of the defendants, moved to amend the case which had been made, by inserting, “that counsel for the defendants objected, that the plain-_ , tiffs ought not to recover, because they had not shown a joint property in themselves, in the goods in question, which objection was overruled by thejudge, at the trial;" and he read an affidavit to that effect, and that the omission arose from the misapprehension of the counsel, at the trial, that he might avail himself of the objection, on the argument, though it was not stated in the case.
    
      Kirtland, contra.
   Per Curiam.

Take your rule to amend in 20 days, with liberty to the plaintiffs, to make amendments also, on their part.

Rule granted.