Case ID: nys_29/html/1148-16.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RIPLEY v. JAUSSEN.
    (Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.
    August 1, 1894.)
    Action by Anna J. Ripley against Virginia Jaussen. J. F. Higgins, for appellant. W. W. Foster, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Error, merely, does not suffice to support an appeal. To authorize a reversal, the error must have operated prejudicially to the appellant. No possible prejudice here resulted from the judgment rendered, for it merely accomplished what appellant was concededly willing to have occur at the time of the trial. The order must be affirmed, with costs.