Case ID: so2d_694/html/0772-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard Steven ATLAS, Appellant, v. William H. STOLBERG, Stolberg and Pence, Appellees.
    No. 95-3344.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    April 23, 1997.
    Rehearing and Clarification Denied June 18, 1997.
    Richard Steven Atlas, North Lauderdale, pro se.
    Jonathan J. Davis and Deborah Poore Knight of Walton Lantaff Sehroeder & Carson, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm as to all issues. Appellees are immune under the principles of Levin, Middlebrooks, Mabie, Thomas, Mayes & Mitchell, P. A. v. United States Fire Insurance Co., 639 So.2d 606 (Fla.1994). Appellees may raise this affirmative defense in a motion to dismiss as it appears on the face of the complaint. See Stern v. First Nat’l Bank of S. Miami, 275 So.2d 58 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). With respect to appellant’s claim that the attorneys are liable under 42 U.S.C. section 1983, it is well settled that private lawyers are not state actors for purposes of section 1983 liability. See Barnard v. Young, 720 F.2d 1188 (10th Cir.1983); Black v. Bayer, 672 F.2d 309, 314 (3d Cir.1982).

Affirmed.

GUNTHER, C.J., and WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.