Case ID: so2d_753/html/0555-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PARIENTE, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ricardo JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 94,801.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Dec. 16, 1999.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Assistant Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, Florida, for Petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Celia Terenzio, Bureau Chief, West Palm Beach, and Debra Reseigno, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, Florida, for Respondent.
   PARIENTE, J.

We have for review the opinion in Johnson v. State, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D2419, — So.2d -, 1998 WL 746142 (Fla 4th DCA Oct. 28, 1998), which certified conflict with the opinions in State v. Holland, 689 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), and State v. Perry, 716 So.2d 327 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Hayes v. State, 750 So.2d 1 (Fla.1999), the decision of the Fourth District is hereby quashed. We remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.