Case ID: nj_143/html/0333-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

671 A.2d 120
    WALTER MILOS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. EXXON COMPANY, USA RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
    Argued January 29, 1996
    Decided February 22, 1996.
    
      Richard V. Jones argued the cause for appellant (Bressler, Amery & Ross, attorneys).
    
      Jerry M. Finn argued the cause for respondent {Schneider, Goldberger, Cohen, Finn, Solomon, Leder & Montalbano, attorneys).
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Rodriguez of the Appellate Division, reported at 281 N.J.Super. 194, 656 A.2d 1300 (1995).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, STEIN and COLEMAN — 6.

Opposed — none.