Case ID: nys_62/html/1134-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CRARY, Respondent, v. DIMOCK et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Coui;t, Appellate Term.
    February 8, 1900.)
    Action by Jessie D. Crary against Julian A. Dimock and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Affirmed. Bradbury C. Chetwood, for appellants. Sidney H. Stuart, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

No question of law is presented for our review, and, as the conflict of fact'was correctly disposed of below, it follows that the judgment must be affirmed. Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.