Case ID: sw3d_358/html/0584-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Don JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 95899.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Feb. 14, 2012.
    Jo Ann Rotermund, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Chris Foster, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J. and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Don Johnson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postcon-viction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying his request for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment .of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).