Case ID: f-appx_667/html/0383-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David Charles BACH, a/k/a David Bach, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CIA, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 16-1191
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 5, 2016
    Decided: July 11, 2016
    
      David Charles Bach, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Charles Bach seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s report recommending that his civil action be dismissed without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final, orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation Bach seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Furthermore, the district court’s adoption of the report and recommendation after Bach noted his appeal does not overcome the jurisdictional defect in Bach’s appeal because the magistrate judge’s report was not an order that the district court could have certified for immediate appeal. See Equip. Fin. Group v. Traverse Comput. Brokers, 973 F.2d 345, 347-48 (4th Cir. 1992) (holding that doctrine of cumulative finality only applies where order appealed from could have been certified under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED