Case ID: sw3d_120/html/0230-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dexter FORD, Appellant.
    No. ED 82305.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Oct. 21, 2003.
    
      Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John Munson Morris, III, Breck Burgess, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dexter Ford appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of second-degree burglary and possession of burglar’s tools. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the judgment was supported by sufficient evidence and the trial court did not err in denying the appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).