Case ID: f_91/html/1004-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SAXLEHNER v. NEILSEN.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    January 5, 1899.)
    No. 85.
    Trade-Marks and Trade-Names.
    Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
    Cross Appeals from a Decree of the Circuit Court, Southern District of New York. 88 Fed. 71.
    Antonio Knauth, for complainant.
    Louis C. Raegener, for defendant.
    Before WALLACE and LACOMBE, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

The questions raised in this cause are substantially the same as in Saxlehner v. Eisner (decided herewith) 91 Fed. 536¡. The circuit court held that complainant had no exclusive right in this country to the name “Hunyadi,” in which conclusion we concur. The circuit court further granted an injunction against continued use of the red and blue labels, and an accounting for past infringements by the use of such labels. For reasons stated in the Eisner Case, the decree as to the labels is reversed, and cause remitted, with instructions to dismiss the bill, with costs of this appeal.