Case ID: conn_158/html/0622-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rosie S. Williams v. Commission on Civil Rights of the State of Connecticut et al.
    King, C. J., Alcorn, House, Thim and Ryan, Js.
    Argued November 12
    decided November 13, 1969
    
      William I. Mark, for the appellant (plaintiff).
    
      Robert L. Hirtle, Jr., assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Robert K. Killian,. attorney general, and F. Michael Ahern, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (named defendant).
    
      John D. Fassett, for the appellee (defendant General Motors Corporation).
   Per Curiam.

It is clear from the record that the trial court, assuming that it had jurisdiction of the subject matter, reached a correct decision on the merits. Even if the court were in error in holding that it had jurisdiction of the subject matter, that error could not have harmed the plaintiff.

There is no error.