Case ID: njl_116/html/0245-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

AARON H. WOODMAN, APPELLANT, v. OVID C. BIANCHI, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE AND FINANCE OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, RESPONDENT.
    Submitted October 25, 1935 —
    Decided February 11, 1936.
    For the appellant, Seymour & Seymour.
    
    For the respondent, Edmund J. Dwyer.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ciiiee Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bobine, Donges, Yan Busktrtc, Deae, Wells, Woles-Keil, Raeeeety, JJ. l'L

For reversal — None.