Case ID: sw3d_105/html/0505-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Myrtle CANADY d/b/a Community Child Care Academy, Appellant, v. Gary J. STANGLER, et al., Respondents.
    No. WD 60504.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    April 22, 2003.
    Motion for Transfer Denied May 27, 2003.
    Myrtle Canady, Kansas City, pro se.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Mark E. Long, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondents.
    Before: NEWTON, P.J., and ULRICH and EDWIN H. SMITH, JJ.
   Order

PER CURIAM.

Myrtle Canady appeals the trial court’s judgment for the respondents, the former and present directors of the State Department of Social Services, Division of Family Services, and the State Department of Health, on her claim that she was owed money by the State for child care sendees that she had provided over a period of years from 1984 to 1994.

Although the appellant raises what she denominates as four points on appeal, her claims in Points I and III are essentially the same. In those points, she claims that the trial court erred in entering judgment for the respondents on her breach of contract claim because it was against the weight of the evidence. In Point II, she claims that the trial court erred in admitting, over her objection, certain exhibits of the respondents because that evidence was not provided in discovery as requested. In Point IV, she claims that the trial court erred in entering judgment for the respondents on her quantum meruit claim because it was against the weight of the evidence.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).