Case ID: sw_283/html/0754-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. Mack CRAWFORD v. EL PASO SASH & DOOR CO.
    (No. 14688.)
    (Supreme Court of Texas.
    May 19, 1926.
    On Rehearing, June 9, 1926.)
    On application for writ of error.
    Lea, McGrady, Thomason & Edwards and J ones, Hardie. & Grambling, all of El Paso, for applicant.
   PER CURIAM.

We do not approve the holding on the question that it was necessary to charge the legal .effect of the deed under the issue made in this, case; but the case having been properly reversed (283 S. W. 232), we will dismiss the application for want of .jurisdiction.

On Rehearing.

The motion for rehearing is granted, since it appears from said motion that the witness Evans was allowed to testify to what actually took place between the parties, and the only part of his testimony which was excluded was inadmissible as the opinion of the witness. Hence the reversal cannot be sustained, as warranted by error for the improper exclusion of Evans’ testimony.