Case ID: app-dc_47/html/0315-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Eobb", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

EISINGER v. GILL. EISINGER v. GILL.
    Those appeals are governed by the decision of the Court in Misinger v. Gill, ante, 312.
    Nos. 3056 and 3057.
    Submitted December 11, 1917.
    Decided February 4, 1918.
    Hearing on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, under the 73d rule for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, in an action on a promissory note.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    The facts are stated in the opinion.
    3fr. Tidy den Johnson and Mr. Thos. H. Patterson for the appellant.
    
      Mr. P. H. Marshall for the appellee.
   Mr. Justice Eobb

delivered the opinion of the Court:

By stipulation of counsel, these eases were to abide by the decision in No. 3055, ante, 312. It follows, therefore, that the judgments in these cases will be affirmed, with costs.

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Sikdonp, of the Supreme Court of tlie District of Columbia, sat with the Court in the hearing and determination of this appeal, in the place of Mr. Justice Van Orsdel.