Case ID: nj-eq_113/html/0138-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Elmer E. Tarburton, complainant-appellant, v. Edna Johnson, executrix, &c., et al., defendants-respondents.
    [Argued February 15th, 1933.
    Decided April 28th, 1933.]
    
      
      Messrs. French, Richards & Bradley, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Franlc R. Bacon and Mr. LeRoy W. Loder, for the respondents.
   Pee Cueiam.

The decree under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Davis as above.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Peeskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Deae, Wells, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.