Case ID: f-appx_197/html/0635-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joan HORTON; et al., Plaintiffs—Appellees, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON; et al., Defendants—Appellants.
    Nos. 05-35048, 05-35052.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted Aug. 7, 2006.
    
    Decided Aug. 11, 2006.
    Linda K. Williams, Esq., Kafoury & McDougal, Daniel W. Meek, Esq., Attorney at Law, Portland, OR, for PlaintiffsAppellees.
    Agnes Sowle, Esq., Office of Multnomah County Attorneys, Charles F. Hinkle, Esq., Stoel Rives, LLP, Portland, OR, Stephen K. Bushong, Esq., Timothy Wood, Esq., Richard D. Wasserman, Esq., AGOR-Office of the Oregon Attorney General, Salem, OR, for Defendants-Appellants.
    Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, REINHARDT and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Appellant State of Oregon’s unopposed motion for summary reversal is granted. The district court’s orders are reversed and the matter is remanded for reconsideration in light of Caruso v. Yamhill County, 422 F.3d 848 (9th Cir.2005).

REVERSED AND REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.