Case ID: pa_586/html/0262-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

893 A.2d 66
    Jean A. HOLLOCK, Respondent v. ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Petitioner.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    June 28, 2005.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of June, 2005, Petitioner’s Application for Leave to Supplement its Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issues:

1) Whether conduct of a party during a bad faith action under 42 Pa.C.S. § 8371 is admissible to support a finding of punitive damages.
2) What scope of review should an appellate court apply when reviewing a punitive damages award?