Case ID: f-appx_61/html/0101-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anthony DOVE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CITY OF KINSTON; Kinston Fire Department; Kinston Human Resources/Personnel Department; Gregory Smith, Fire Chief; Karl L. Munson, Human Resource Director; County of Lenoir, North Carolina; Lenoir County Sheriffs Department; Lenoir County Jail; Billy Smith, Lenoir County Sheriff; Archie Bruiton, Lenoir County Head Jailer; Branson Vickory, District Attorney for District 8; Imelda Pate, District Attorney for District 8A, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 02-7797.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted April 1, 2003.
    Decided April 17, 2003.
    Anthony Dove, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia A. Piekarski, Constangy, Brooks & Smith, L.L.C., Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Mark Allen Davis, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Raleigh, North Carolina; Gerald Patrick Murphy, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Anthony Dove appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Dove v. City of Kinston, No. CA-02-34-4H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 18, 2002). Because this opinion comports with Dove’s motion for a written opinion, we grant that motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.