Case ID: nc_192/html/0503-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Stacy, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

TAYLOR & FETZER v. R. F. GENTRY.
    (Filed 10 November, 1926.)
    Judgments — Pleadings — Default — Meritorious Defense — Appeal and Error.
    An order of tbe lower court setting aside a judgment by default will be reversed in tbe Supreme Court, when it is not made to appear that tbe defendant bas a meritorious defense.
    Appeal by plaintiff from Lane, J., at February Term, 1926, of' ROCKINGHAM.
    Motion to set aside judgment by default final, rendered by tbe recorder’s court of tbe town of Reidsville, 13 October, 1925. Motion allowed by tbe recorder, and tbis ruling was affirmed on appeal to tbe Superior Court at tbe February Term, 1926. Plaintiff appeals.
    
      J. 0. Brown for plaintiff.
    
    
      No counsel appearing for defendant.
    
   Stacy, C. J.

Plaintiff obtained judgment by default final in tbe recorder’s court of tbe town of Reidsville on 13 October, 1925. Tbis was set aside fourteen days thereafter, on motion of tbe defendant, on tbe ground of “mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect,” under O. S., 600. On appeal by tbe plaintiff to tbe Superior Court tbe order setting aside tbe judgment in tbe recorder’s court was affirmed.

Plaintiff takes two positions: First, that tbe recorder’s court was without authority to entertain tbe motion, and, as tbe Superior Court could exercise derivative jurisdiction only, it was also without authority to decide tbe question. Sewing Machine Co. v. Burger, 181 N. C., 241. Second, that on tbe facts found, tbe defendant is not entitled to have tbe judgment vacated or set aside.

Without passing upon tbe merits of tbe first position, we deem it sufficient to say that there is no allegation or finding of a meritorious defense. . It is useless to set aside a judgment where there is no real or substantial defense on tbe merits. Land Co. v. Wooten, 177 N. C., 248; Norton v. McLaurin, 125 N. C., 185. “One who asks to be relieved from a judgment on the ground of excusable neglect must show merit, as otherwise the court would be asked to do the vain thing of setting aside a judgment when it would be its duty to enter again the same judgment on motion of the adverse party.” Allen, J., in Crumpler v. Mines, 174 N. C., 283.

On the record, there was error in setting aside the judgment.

Reversed.