Case ID: ad2d_249/html/0927-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Eleanor Barrera, Respondent, v Frontier Central School District, Appellant.
    [672 NYS2d 218]
   —Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Respondent appeals from a judgment that granted the CPLR article 78 petition alleging that respondent impermissibly terminated petitioner’s employment without a hearing in violation of Civil Service Law § 75. Supreme Court thereby annulled respondent’s determination to accept the “resignation” of petitioner from her position as a school bus driver, reinstated her to that position, and granted her back pay and benefits. Respondent contends that petitioner was not entitled to a hearing before respondent accepted her “resignation” pursuant to a provision of the collective bargaining agreement that deems an absence without leave in excess of 10 consecutive work days to constitute a resignation from employment.

An employer’s acceptance of an employee’s constructive resignation, as provided by a collective bargaining agreement, is not a disciplinary action that entitles the employee to prior notice or a hearing (see, Matter of Plummer v Klepak, 48 NY2d 486, 489-490, cert denied 445 US 952). An agreement between the employer and the union constitutes a waiver of the employee’s protections under Civil Service Law § 75. Further, due process is satisfied by the inclusion of a grievance procedure in the collective bargaining agreement, irrespective of whether petitioner availed herself of that grievance procedure (see, Matter of Plummer v Klepak, supra, at 489-490; see also, Antinore v State of New York, 49 AD2d 6, 10-12, affd 40 NY2d 921; Guilford v City of Buffalo, 177 AD2d 971, 971-972, appeal dismissed and lv denied 79 NY2d 912; Matter of Flemming v Cagliostro, 53 AD2d 187, 189, lv denied 40 NY2d 806; see generally, Civil Service Law § 76 [4]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Doyle, J. — CPLR art IS.) Present — Denman, P. J., Lawton, Pigott, Jr., Balio and Boehm, JJ.