Case ID: so2d_175/html/0593-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harvey VOGEL, Appellant, v. Charlotte VOGEL, Appellee.
    No. 64-921.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    June 1, 1965.
    Michael H. Salmon, Miami Beach, and Alan E. Greenfield, Miami, for appellant.
    Forrest E. Gotthardt; Herman Cohen; and Richard M. Gale, Miami, for appellee.
    Before TILLMAN PEARSON, CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

On this appeal from a divorce decree the appellant-husband contends it was error to require him to pay the wife’s attorney fees and that the alimony allowance was excessive. The appellee-wife on cross assignment contends it was error to decree the cancellation of certain deeds from the husband to her. We have considered these several contentions of the parties in the light of the record and briefs, and we conclude that no reversible error has been shown.

Affirmed.