Case ID: mj_70/html/0219-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Wednesday, June 22, 2011
    No. 11-0467/AR.
    U.S. v. Arthur R. Young Jr.
   CCA 20090092. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, and Appellant’s motion to file a supplemental supplement to the petition for grant of review, it is ordered that said motion to file a supplemental supplement to the petition for grant of review is hereby granted, and that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue specified by the Court:

WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S RECENT OPINIONS IN MEDINA, MILLER, AND JONES.

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.