Case ID: so2d_652/html/0892-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Interest of D.S. and J.V., minor children.
    Nos. 94-0295, 94-0296.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    March 15, 1995.
    Rehearing Denied April 27, 1995.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Eric M. Cumfer, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellants D.S. and J.V.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Melvina Racey Flaherty, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee State.'
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellants’ juvenile adjudications for the offense of simple battery. Any eiTor in allowing Officer Warren’s hearsay testimony regarding whether the call to police concerning the battery came before a call from the same locale concerning a shooting, is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). (There is no suggestion that an alleged shooting had anything to do with the offense for which D.S. and J.V. were adjudicated.)

We further affirm the trial court’s imposition of a condition of community control that appellant D.S. “not associate with gang members.” However, we clarify this provision to the effect that, just as any violation of probation must include the element of intent, there would have to be a showing that D.S. knew the individuals were gang members before he could be found guilty of knowingly violating such a provision.

AFFIRMED.

STONE, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.