Case ID: sw3d_129/html/0455-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Julius T. COLLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 82799.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    March 16, 2004.
    Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and MARY R. RUSSELL, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Julius T. Collins (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).