Case ID: f-appx_184/html/0627-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randall J. BEMIS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-35199.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 5, 2006.
    
    Filed June 9, 2006.
    Stephen Gunnels, AUSA, Eugene, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Randall J. Bemis, Sheridan, OR, pro se.
    Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

We have reviewed the opening brief. This appeal is appropriate for summary disposition under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-6 because appellant challenges his sentence based on United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), but Booker does not apply to cases on collateral review. United States v. Cruz, 423 F.3d 1119, 1120-21 (9th Cir.2005) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.