Case ID: sw_197/html/0869-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DAYIDSON, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RAMSEY v. STATE.
    (No. 4582.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Oct. 10, 1917.)
    Ceiminax, Law <&wkey;1114(3) — Appeal—Record —Absence op Evidence and Bill op Exceptions.
    The motion for a new trial having raised the questions of insufficiency of the evidence and refusal of requested instructions, there is. nothing to review, where the evidence is not in the record, and no bill of exceptions was reserved.
    Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; C. A. Pippen, Judge.
    Lawrence Ramsey was convicted of carrying a pistol, and appeals.
    Affirmed.
    E. B. Hendricks, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   DAYIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of carrying a pistol; his punishment being assessed at 30 days’ imprisonment in the county jail.

The motion for a new trial raises the insufficiency of the evidence and the refusal of the court to give requested instructions. The evidence is not in the record, nor was any bill of exceptions reserved. There is nothing, therefore, presented that can be revised.

The judgment will be affirmed.