Case ID: sw3d_138/html/0739-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas GLAUB and Cynthia Glaub, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CENTRAL GARDEN & PET CO., et al., Defendants/Respondents.
    No. ED 82124.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    July 29, 2003.
    Althea P. Johns, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Peter von Gontard, Nancy L. Cai'dinale, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, Thomas Glaub and Cynthia Glaub, appeal from the judgment dismissing their action that alleged Thomas Glaub suffered injuries when he used a flea treatment. No error of law appears and an opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).