Case ID: sw2d_33/html/1119-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SMITI-I, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CURTIS & COX, Appellants, v. J. R. DAVIS et al., Appellees.
    No. 8503.
    Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.
    Dec. 10, 1930.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 14, 1931.
    Mason & Maney, of Pearsall, for appellants.
    S. T. Dowe and Magus Smith, both of Pear-sall, for appellees.
   SMITI-I, J.

This action was brought by Davis, appellee, against Curtis & Cox, appellants, to recover the landlord’s share in five bales of cotton alleged to have been raised by a tenant on ap-pellee’s farm and converted by appellants with notice of the landlord’s lien. As a result of a trial before the court without a jury, judgment was rendered in favor of appellee as prayed for.

As there is no statement of facts in the record, we can look only to the trial judge’s findings, which were reduced to writing and form a part of the record on appeal.

Those findings support the judgment, which will be here affirmed.