Case ID: pa-super_255/html/0628-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

387 A.2d 923
    Lloyd, Appellant, v. Atterol Corporation.
    Argued September 15, 1977.
    Bernard Edelson, with him Caine, DiPasqua, Edelson, Patterson & Butler, for appellant;
    Andrew J. Forbes, with him Cramp, D’lorio, McConchie, Forbes & Surrick, for appellee.
   Order affirmed.

HOFFMAN, J., dissented because there were sufficient issues of fact which, if the jury resolved them in appellant’s favor, would create liability.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.