Case ID: sw2d_767/html/0594-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Barbara E. RIPPEL, Appellant-Respondent, v. Charles WORSTELL and Brenda Worstell, Respondents-Appellants.
    No. WD 40806.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Feb. 28, 1989.
    Rehearing Denied May 2, 1989.
    Everett S. Van Matre of Van Matre & Van Matre, Inc., Mexico, for Barbara E. Rippel.
    C. Christy Barton, Jefferson City, and Dewey L. Crepeau of Crepeau & Roberts, Columbia, for the Worstells.
    Before MANFORD, P.J., and TURNAGE and LOWENSTEIN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Direct appeal from a judgment denying enforcement of promissory notes due to the defense of fraud in the inducement. Cross-appeal from a judgment denying recision and cancellation of the promissory notes and related sales contract, and damages. The appeals are consolidated.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).