Case ID: njl_127/html/0602-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LOTTIE SCHLANK ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE DISTRICT OF HOBOKEN, RESPONDENT.
    Argued October 24, 1941 —
    Decided January 9, 1942.
    For the appellants, Jerome G. Eisenberg.
    
    For the respondent, William J. Hanley.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Parker, Bodine, Persicie, Poster, Colib, Dear, Wells, Woles-Keil, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.