Case ID: f-appx_518/html/0236-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alvin DARDEN; Diane Darden, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT, d/b/a Travelers, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 12-2473.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 18, 2013.
    Decided: April 22, 2013.
    Alvin Darden, Diane Darden, Appellants Pro Se. Craig David Roswell, Michael David Stallings, Niles, Barton & Wilmer, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alvin and Diane Darden appeal the district court’s order entering judgment following a jury trial. The record does not contain a transcript of trial proceedings. An appellant has the burden of including in the record on appeal a transcript of all parts of the proceedings material to the issues raised on appeal. Fed. R.App. P. 10(b); 4th Cir. R. 10(c). By failing to produce a transcript or to qualify for the production of a transcript at government expense, the Dardens have waived review of the issues on appeal that depend upon the transcript to show error. See generally Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(2); Keller v. Prince George’s Cnty., 827 F.2d 952, 954 n. 1 (4th Cir.1987). As no error appears on the record before us, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.