Case ID: f2d_341/html/0378-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Buford WALDROFF, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
    No. 21619.
    United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
    Feb. 2, 1965.
    S. Gunter Toney, Tallahassee, Fla., for appellant.
    John W. Popper, Jr., Floyd M. Buford, U. S. Atty., Sampson M. Culpepper, Asst. U. S. Atty., Macon, Ga., for appellee.
    
      Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and MOORE  and BELL, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       Of the Second Circuit, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of possessing, ^selling, and transporting non-tax-paid 'whiskey. He admitted the acts in question and relied on the defense of entrapment. This defense was submitted to the jury as a fact issue, and this necessarily included all questions relative to inducement and predisposition. The submis-sion was proper under the evidence adduced, and there the matter ended. Ha-gans v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 315 F.2d 67, cert, den., 375 U.S. 826, 84 S.Ct. 68,11 L.Ed.2d 58.

Affirmed.