Case ID: ad_179/html/0913-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Terrace Reddin, Appellant, v. Adams Laundry Machine Company, Respondent.
    Judgment of “the Appellate Term reversing the judgment of the Third District Municipal Court of the City of New York, and directing dismissal of the complaint, affirmed, with costs, on both grounds assigned by the Appellate Term, namely, that the vendor did not retake the property until about November 5 or 6, 1915, and that neither the chattel mortgagee nor the plaintiff as his assignee was such a “ successor in interest ” of the vendee as the vendor was required to serve with notice of sale under' section 66 of the Personal Property Law. 
    
    
      
       See Consol. Laws, chap. 41 (Laws of 1909, chap. 45), § 65 et seq.— [Rep.
    
   Jenks, P. J., Stapleton, Rich, Putnam and Blaekmar, JJ., concurred.