Case ID: njl_74/html/0685-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SARAH BURNS AND HUSBAND, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. RICHARD ECKERT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued December 3, 1906 —
    Decided February 2, 1907.
    On error to the Supreme Court. ■
    Por the plaintiff in error, Thomas F. Noonan.
    
    Por the defendants in error, Howard R. Cruse.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment in this cause is affirmed, for the reason given in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Garrison, Hendrickson, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 12.

For reversal — Hone.