Case ID: f-appx_668/html/0441-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rhonda T. BRANTLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ETHICON, INCORPORATED; Johnson & Johnson, Defendants-Appellees. Shelia L. Bracato, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ethicon, Incorporated; Johnson & Johnson, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 16-1192, No. 16-1194
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: August 12, 2016
    Decided: August 24, 2016
    Tracy W. Houck, Ron Riggle, HOUCK & RIGGLE, LLC, Ruston, Louisiana, for Appellants. Philip Combs, David B. Thomas, Daniel R. Higginbotham, THOMAS COMBS & SPANN, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia; John C. Henegan, Sr., Christy Jones, Susanna Moore Moldo-veanu, BUTLER SNOW LLP, Ridgeland, Mississippi, for Appellees.
    Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rhonda T. Brantley and Shelia L. Bra-cato appeal the district court’s orders dismissing these actions for failure to timely effect service of process. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brantley v. Ethicon, Inc., Nos. 2:12-cv-02605, 2:12-md-02327, 2016 WL 305064 (S.D. W. Va. Jan. 25, 2016); Bracato v. Ethicon, Inc., Nos. 2:12-cv-02697, 2:12-md-02327, 2016 WL 312366 (S.D. W. Va. Jan. 25, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED