Case ID: f-appx_96/html/0881-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Timothy Earl BROWN, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 03-4820.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted April 28, 2004.
    Decided May 11, 2004.
    Timothy Earl Brown, Appellant pro se. Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c))
   PER CURIAM:

Timothy Earl Brown appeals the district court’s order declining to grant a downward sentencing departure, following this Court’s limited remand. The sole contention Brown pursues on appeal is that he was entitled to a new sentencing hearing upon remand so that he could be present during resentencing and be given an opportunity to allocute. We conclude that a new sentencing hearing was unnecessary to decide the issue on remand. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order upon remand. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED