Case ID: so2d_435/html/0861-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rodrick NANCE, Appellant, v. Lisa NANCE, Appellee.
    No. 82-2121.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    June 8, 1983.
    Rehearing Denied Aug. 31, 1983.
    Stephen M. Bell, Plantation, for appellant.
    Victoria L. Semora, Hollywood, for appel-lee.
   PER CURIAM.

The trial court has not been shown to have been in error in concluding that the wife, by terms of the final judgment, was prohibited only from removing the child from the State on a “permanent basis” and that the removal under the circumstances was not permanent so as to require modification.

Affirmed.

LETTS, C.J., and BERANEK and WALDEN, JJ., concur.