Case ID: ga_116/html/0439-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Eish, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Baird et al. v. Bate.
    Argued October 9,
    Decided October 30, 1902.
    Equitable petition. Before Judge Gober. Cobb superior court. May 5, 1902.
    
      Sessions & Moss, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      B. W. Blair andR. T. Prey, contra.
   Eish, J.

There was no error in admitting or rejecting evidence ; the alleged newly discovered evidence could have been discovered by the exercise of ordinary diligence ; the charges complained of were substantially correct ; and the evidence warranted the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.