Case ID: nj-eq_140/html/0182-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dorothy Richards Hopkins, complainant, v. Edward J. Dimock, &c., et al., defendants.
    [Submitted February 14th, 1947.
    Decided May 15th, 1947.]
    
      Messrs. Si-ryker, Tams £ Ilorner (Mr. James E. M. Tams, of counsel), and Messrs. Wall, Haight, Carey £ Harlpenc.e (Mr. William Ii. Carey, of counsel), for the defenclantsappellants.
    
      Messrs. Pitney, Hardin, Ward ■£ Brennan (Mr. Mahlon Pitney, of counsel), and Mr. Harold M. Kain, for the defendants-respondents-cross appellants.
    
      Messrs. Siickel £ Sliclcel, for the defendant-respondent.
    
      Mr. Sydney G. Soons (Mr. Harrison P. Durand, of counsel), for the complainant-respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion died in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Kays and reported at 188 N. J. Eq. 434.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-,'Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, PIeiier, Colie, Waci-ienebld, Eastwood, Wells, Eaeeerty, Freund, McGeehan, McLean, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.