Case ID: njl_134/html/0254-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HENRY FROST ET UX., RESPONDENTS, v. MORRIS ALPER, APPELLANT.
    Argued February 6, 1946
    Decided April 25, 1946.
    For the appellant, Jerome Alper.
    
    For the respondents, David Weiniclc.
    
   Per Curiam.

The legal situation in this case is similar to that which was considered by this court at length in Zuest v. Ingra, decided on January 31st, 1946. Our opinion in that case is reported in 134 N. J. L. 15.

For the reasons stated in that opinion, the judgment under review will be reversed.

For affirmance — None.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Parker, Donges, Heher, Colie, Oliphant, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, Mc-Geehan, JJ. 11.