Case ID: sw3d_144/html/0314-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Opinion by LOWENSTEIN, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Timothy D. STILL, Appellant.
    No. WD 63680.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Sept. 14, 2004.
    Joshua Fay, Moberly, MO, for Appellant.
    Robert W. Wheeler, Keytesville, MO, for Respondent.
    Before NEWTON, P.J., LOWENSTEIN and HOLLIGER, JJ.
   Opinion by LOWENSTEIN, J.

Timothy Still appeals from his conviction for receiving stolen property, Section 570.080.

This court has reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. Finding no reversible error, we affirm the conviction. Because a published opinion reciting the facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, this court affirms by summary order under Rule 30.25(b).

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).