Case ID: nj-super_154/html/0173-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HELEN HYJACK, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JOSEPH M. NOLAN, ETC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
    Argued November 9, 1977
    Decided December 1, 1977.
    Before Judges Lynch, Bischoff and Kole.
    
      Mr. Jay Scott MacNeill argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Nolan, Dynes, Bell & Moore, attorneys; Messrs. Mac-Neill and William F. McEnroe on the brief).
    
      Mr. James E. Flynn argued the cause for respondents.
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Kentz in his opinion reported at 144 N. J. Super. 545 (Law Div. 1976).