Case ID: so2d_498/html/0685-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles PAWLEY, Appellant, v. CARIBANK, N.A., Appellee.
    No. 86-245.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 16, 1986.
    Louis L. LaFontisee, Jr., Miami, for appellant.
    Sparber, Shevin, Shapo, Heilbronner & Book and Brian S. Dervishi, Miami, for appellee.
    Before HUBBART, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Finding that appellee’s affidavit filed in support of its motion for summary judgment was insufficient because it failed to establish the prime rate on which interest was calculated, and that genuine issues of material fact remain, we reverse the Final Summary Judgment and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. Pla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(e).

Reversed and remanded.