Case ID: or-app_143/html/0313-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted July 22,
    affirmed August 28,
    petition for review denied November 26, 1996 (324 Or 394)
    In the Matter of the Marriage of Vivian M. HOWELL-HOOYMAN, aka Vicky Hooyman, Respondent, and Dennis R. HOOYMAN, Appellant. Dennis R. HOOYMAN, Appellant, and Vivian M. HOWELL, aka Vivian M. Howell-Hooyman, Respondent.
    
    (89C-32030; CA A89692)
    922 P2d 1263
    Dennis V. Messoline argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
    Gilbert Feibleman waived appearance for respondent.
    Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Husband appeals from an order raising his child support obligation. ORS 107.135. He argues that the trial court erred in computing his child support obligation when it failed to consider social security benefits that his children receive.

Husband’s income consists entirely of disability benefits that total $2,500 per month. As a result of certain social security disability benefits husband receives, the parties’ children also receive direct social security benefits of $344 per month. Husband argues that the trial court erred in computing his child support obligation when it failed either to include the $344 per month as income to wife or to credit that amount against his monthly support obligation. According to our reading of the record, the trial court included those benefits as part of wife’s monthly income in its calculation when it increased her monthly income from $2,076 to $2,421 per month. Father’s other arguments do not require discussion.

Affirmed.