Case ID: f-appx_141/html/0212-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John Patrick MCSHEFFREY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Kathleen HAWK-SAWYER, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons; Margaret C. Hambrick, Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Annapolis, Maryland; Gregory Bogdan, in his individual and official capacity as Associate Warden, Cumberland Federal Correctional Institution; William Henderson, in his individual and official capacity as Associate Warden, Cumberland Federal Correctional Institution; Jeffrey Bolyard, in his individual and official capacity as Superintendent of Industries, Cumberland Federal Correctional Institution; Jerry Lewis, in his individual and official capacity as Lieutenant, Cumberland Federal Correctional Institution; Shirley Crump, in his individual and official capacity, Cumberland Federal Correctional Institution; R. Dulla, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 05-6453.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 18, 2005.
    Decided Aug. 24, 2005.
    John Patrick McSheffrey, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Jennifer A. Wright, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; Beverly M. Russell, Office of the United States Attorney, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
    Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

John Patrick McSheffrey appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McSheffrey v. Hawk-Sawyer, No. CA-04-1195-AMD (D.Md. filed Jan. 28, 2005 & entered Jan. 31, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED