Case ID: so2d_739/html/0733-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PINECREST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida Limited Partnership; d/b/a Pinecrest Convalescent Home and Barton D. Weisman, a general partner, Appellees.
    No. 99-1018.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Sept. 13, 1999.
    Wiederhold, Moses, Bulfin & Rubin and Robert D. Moses, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    McGrane & Nosich and Rhea P. Gross-man, Coral Gables, for appellees.
    Before NESBITT, SHEVIN and SORONDO, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final summary judgment as the trial court properly enforced the insurance policy in accordance with its plain language and entered judgment concerning the attorney’s fee issue in favor of appellees. See Wilson v. Wasser, 562 So.2d 339 (Fla.1990); Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Bouchoc, 514 So.2d 52 (Fla.1987); Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Lamm, 218 So.2d 219 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 225 So.2d 529 (Fla.1969).

Affirmed.