Case ID: f-appx_370/html/0406-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rodriguez Samuel Da Matha DE SANTANNA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP; Eric Frechtel, Attorney, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 09-2154.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 16, 2010.
    Decided: March 19, 2010.
    Rodriguez Samuel Da Matha De Santan-na, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Burnett Smith, Bradley, Arant, Rose & White, Huntsville, Alabama, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rodriguez Samuel Da Matha De Santan-na appeals from the district court order dismissing his claims against the law firm of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP (“Bradley Arant”). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Da Matha De Santanna v. Bradley Arant Cummings LLP, No. 8:09-cv-02438-RWT (D.Md. Sept. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.