Case ID: nj-eq_58/html/0584-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rutherford Boiling Springs and Carlstadt Electric Company, appellant, v. Franklin Trust Company, respondent.
    [Filed March 6th, 1899.]
    On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Pitney, whose opinion is reported in Franklin Trust Co. v. Rutherford Boiling Springs and Carlstadt Electric Co., 12 Dick. Ch. Rep. 42.
    
    
      Mr. Addison Ely, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. William JET. Gorhin, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Nixon, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh — 14.

For reversal — None.