Case ID: nys_101/html/1122-09.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GEORGE R. READ & CO., Respondent, v. ORR, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    November 14, 1906.)
    Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Third District. Action by George R. Read & Co. against Margaret Y. Orr. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed. David Orr, for appellant. Wentworth, Lowenstein & Stern, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

In our opinion the second action was not a judicial action or proceeding pending in a court of this state, within the meaning of these words as used in section 2, c. 516, p. 1405, Laws 1906, and therefore the law repealed was not applicable in it. As the record shows no reason for a reversal, the judgment will he affirmed, with costs.