Case ID: ad_173/html/0962-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam: The", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Application of Candee, Smith & Howland Company, Appellant, for Leave to Sue in Its Own Name on the Undertaking given by Cleonice Policastro and Another to Discharge a Mechanic’s Lien Filed by Petitioner; Illinois Surety Company, Respondent.
    Appeal from an order, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 7th day of February, 1916, denying a motion by petitioner for leave to sue the Illinois Surety Company on its undertaking given to discharge a mechanic’s lien.
   Per Curiam: The

order appealed from is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that no leave to sue is necessary. (Pierce, Butler &Pierce Mfg. Co. v. Wilson, 118 App. Div. 662; Vitelli v. May, 120 id. 448.) Present—Clarke, P. J., Scott, Dowling, Smith and Page, JJ. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.