Case ID: misc2d_75/html/0104-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

City of New York, Petitioner-Appellant-Respondent, v. Robbins Men and Boys Wear Corp., Respondent-Respondent-Appellant.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    June 27, 1973.
    
      Norman Redlich, Corporation Counsel (Morris Einhorn and Stanley Buchsbaum of counsel), for appellant-respondent. J. Stanley Shaw for respondent-appellant.
   Per Curiam.

Subdivision b of section B15-37.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, with respect to the payment of rent after the vesting of title, applies to “ All persons in possession ” and therefore clearly encompasses one in the position of a subtenant. We also find that the provision made for the determination of rent was a proper exercise of authority by the city (Municipal Home Rule Law, § 10, subd. 1, par. a, cl. [6]; General City Law, § 20, subd. 2).

Final judgment in favor of tenant respondent unanimously reversed, with $30 costs to petitioner landlord, and final judgment directed to be entered in favor of petitioner for the amount sought in the petition.

Concur — Schwartzwald, P. J., Rinaldi and Cone, JJ.