Case ID: f-appx_545/html/0703-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edgar MENDOZA-ZAPATA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 12-10081.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 19, 2013.
    
    Filed Nov. 25, 2013.
    Christina Marie Cabanillas, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Vincent Lawrence Lacsamana, Esquire, Vincent L. Lacsamana PC, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Edgar Mendoza-Zapata appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 18-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Because Mendoza-Zapata has fully served his custodial sentence and is not subject to a term of supervised released, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir.1999).

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.