Case ID: f-appx_575/html/0493-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Adolfo Michael SOSA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-10136
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals; Fifth Circuit.
    July 21, 2014.
    James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Raul Antonio Canez, Attorney, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Adolfo Michael Sosa, Beaumont, TX, pro se.
    Before REAVLEY, JONES, and .'. PRADO, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Adolfo Michael Sosa has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Sosa has filed a letter in response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Sosa’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Sosa’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that Sosa’s appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.