Case ID: ny_210/html/0627-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary E. Potter, Respondent, v. Fred R. Engert, Appellant.
    
      Potter v. Engert, 151 App. Div. 897, affirmed.
    (Submitted February 13, 1914;
    decided March 24, 1914.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 10, 1912, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to restrain the defendant from interfering with a line fence between property belonging to his wife and the plaintiff’s property and for damages.
    
      F. E. Converse and E. W. Hamn for appellant.
    
      Clyde W. Knapp for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed,' with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Cuddeback, Hogan, Miller and Cardozo, JJ.