Case ID: so2d_742/html/0292-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard EMANUEL, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and Harry K. Singletary, Respondents.
    No. 97-4300.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    July 29, 1998.
    R. Mitchell Prugh, Melrose, for petitioner.
    William L. Camper, General Counsel, and Bradley R. Bischoff, Assistant General Counsel, for respondent Florida Parole Commission; Louis A. Vargas, General Counsel and Susan Schwartz, Assistant General Counsel, for respondent Single-tary.
   PER CURIAM.

In accordance with Sheley v. Florida Parole Commission, 703 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), we have treated this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, and we deny relief on the merits. However, to the extent we have undertaken review by certiorari, we certify conflict, as we did in Sheley, with Johnson v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 543 So.2d 875 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

JOANOS and WEBSTER, JJ. and SHIVERS, DOUGLASS B., Senior Judge, concur.