Case ID: f-appx_708/html/0634-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donna DEMPS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 17-10783 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    (January 9, 2018)
    Linda Julin McNamara, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, Suzanne C. Nebesky, Thomas Nelson Palermo, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, Kristen A. Fiore, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Donna Demps, Pro Se
    Before MARCUS, ROSENBAUM and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Serbo Simeoni, appointed counsel for Donna Demps in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Demps’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.