Case ID: wash-2d_120/html/0325-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 59466-0.
    Department Two.
    November 25, 1992.]
    The State of Washington, Respondent, v. Jaysen O.K. Ryland, Appellant.
    
    
      
      Andrew P. Zinner of Washington Appellate Defender Association, for appellant.
    
      Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Theresa Fricke, Senior Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

A Department of this court unanimously adopts the reasoning of the dissent in State v. Ryland, 65 Wn. App. 806, 810, 829 P.2d 806 (1992) (Agid, J., dissenting). Accordingly, the case is remanded to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether the police officer reasonably believed the houseguest had authority to consent to entry. The case is thereafter remanded to the Court of Appeals, Division One, for resolution.

Reconsideration denied December 30, 1992.