Case ID: a3d_64/html/0627-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Julia Y. DYCKMAN, Petitioner v. Dennis V. DYCKMAN, Respondent.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    March 27, 2013.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(lp Does the Superior Court decision markedly conflict with the plain wording of section 3105(c) of the divorce code, 23 Pa.C.S.A. § 3105(c)?
(1) Does the Superior Court decision markedly conflict with a series of other decisions of the Superior Court, including Sorace v. Sorace, 440 Pa.Super. 75, 655 A.2d 125 (1995); Gaster v. Gaster, 703 A.2d 513 (Pa.Super.1997); McMahon v. McMahon, 417 Pa.Super. 592, 612 A.2d 1360 (1992) (en banc); Peck v. Peck, 707 A.2d 1163 (Pa.Super.1998) and Miller v. Miller, 2009 PA Super 197, 983 A.2d 736 (2009)?