Case ID: pa_318/html/0569-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

White et al. v. Atlantic Refining Company, Appellant.
    Argued January 21, 1935;
    reargued May 13, 1935.
    Before Simpson, Kephart, Schaefer, Maxey, Drew and Linn, JJ.
    
      Theodore Lane Bean, for appellant.
    
      Samuel D. Conner, for appellees.
    May 27, 1935:
   Per Curiam,

We are satisfied upon an inspection of the premises that since Judge Knight made his decree December 8, 1933, there is merit in the contention that there has been an encroachment of business within the 600-foot radius found to be exclusively residential. We accordingly direct the record to be returned to the court below and the proceedings remanded for a rehearing in the light of the changes of conditions which have taken place since the hearing of the cause before the chancellor.