Case ID: ga_147/html/0425-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Eisn, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mungin v. The State.
    No. 453.
    November 17, 1917.
    Indictment for murder. Before Judge Graham. Appling superior court. May 12, 1917.
    
      Padgett & Watson, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Clifford Walker, attorney-general, Alvin V. Sellers, solicitor-general, and M. C. Bennet, contra.
   Eisn, C. J.

1. The remarks of the judge addressed to counsel for the accused in presence of the jury, of which complaint is made in the amendment to the motion for new trial, do not amount to an expression of an opinion on a material matter involved in the case, and do not afford ground for a reversal.

2. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no error in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.