Case ID: f-appx_328/html/0275-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joshua Brent MCCLARY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FOWLKES, Mrs., Nurse; Clark, Mrs., Doctor; C.D. Davis, Capt.; J. Merritt, Lt.; W. Best, Defendants-Appellees, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Party-in-Interest-Appellee.
    No. 08-8078.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 8, 2009.
    Decided: July 2, 2009.
    Joshua Brent McClary, Appellant Pro Se. William Wayne Muse, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia; John Otto Easton, Virginia Margaret Sadler, Jordan, Coyne & Savits, LLP, Fairfax, Virginia; Lisa Ehrich, Jeff W. Rosen, Pender & Coward, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joshua Brent McClary appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ summary judgment motions on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims against them. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. McClary v. Fowlkes, No. 1:07-cv-01080-LO-TCB, 2008 WL 3992637 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 27, 2008; entered Aug. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.