Case ID: dc_3/html/0068-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Cranch, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

D. Kurtz, Trustee of the Bank of Columbia, v. Hollingshead’s Heirs and Personal Representatives.
    If a'complainant in equity has lost his legal lien and priority, a court of equity will not set it up against other creditors equally meritorious.
    This was a bill in equity for the sale of real estate mortgaged in August 1814, by Hollingshead to Kurtz, as trustee for the Bank of Columbia, by two deeds which were not recorded, and are now lost.
    Mr. Melvin, one of the defendants, who indorsed other notes of Hollingshead, objects to the complainant’s claim of priority, or lien upon the land.
    The two deeds were in possession of the bank at the commencement of this suit, and the bill prayed that they might be recorded agreeably to the 11th section of the Act of Maryland, 1785, c. 72, which also provides that such deed, so recorded, should not “in any manner affect the creditors of the party making such deed, who may trust such party after the date of the
    
      The bill also prayed that the mortgages might be foreclosed, and the property sold for the payment of the debt.
   Cranch, C. J.

The complainants are now seeking, in equity, to establish a legal priority. “ Equity is equality.” The equity of the other creditors is equal to that of the bank, and the bank has lost its legal priority. I think the bill must- be dismissed, but without costs, as the deeds have been lost since the bill was filed.

Thruston, J. concurred. Morseul, J., doubted*

Bill dismissed.