Case ID: nj-eq_100/html/0360-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

F. Bedell Wills et al., respondents, v. N. Ross James et al., appellants.
    [Decided October 27th, 1926.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning, whose opinion is reported in 99 N. J. Eq. 10.
    
    
      Mr. Furman A. DeMaris, Jr., for the respondents.
    
      Mr. Oscar B. Redrow, for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justioe, Teenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, MoGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.