Case ID: a3d_169/html/0003-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC, Respondent v. Rodger LINDSAY, Petitioner
    No. 383 EAL 2016
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    March 7, 2017
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of March, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED with respect to the issue raised, and as presented, by the Petitioner:

Whether the Superior Court erred in determining that a homeowner was not the prevailing party because a residential mortgage foreclosure action does not “arise under Act 6” where the homeowner raised defenses to a mortgage foreclosure under Act 6 and the lender then discontinued the mortgage foreclosure action?