Case ID: okla_148/html/0262-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "RILEY, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOHNSON et al. v. DOUGLAS et al.
    No. 19943.
    Opinion Filed April 28, 1931.
    J. B. Campbell, Etha Lawrence, and J. Ralph Knight, for plaintiffs in error.
    A. E. Pearson, Silverman & Rosenstein, Hill & Banta, Cutlip, Horsley & Lott, and A. S. Norvell, for defendants in error.
   RILEY, J.

In this case substantially the same state of facts are pleaded as in En-le-te-ke. et al. v. W. A. Beasley et al., No. 19939, this day decided, 148 Okla. 255, 298 Pac. 611, and with which this case, with others, was consolidated.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., and HEFNER, CTJLLI-SON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, V. C. J., not participating.