Case ID: sw3d_559/html/0433-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dequan A. HAWKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    WD 80275
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    ORDER FILED: October 30, 2018
    Carol D. Jansen, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
    Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge
    ORDER
   Per curiam:

Dequan Hawkins appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 amended motion following an evidentiary hearing. Hawkins asserts that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion for post-conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel in that his trial counsel failed to object to the admission of a witness's entire videotaped statement to police. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).