Case ID: so2d_558/html/0149-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Elisha GILBERT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 89-1831.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 13, 1990.
    Elisha Gilbert, in pro. per.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The errors asserted in defendant’s second petition for post-conviction relief were either presented or could have been presented in defendant’s first petition. Thus, his second petition is procedurally barred. Tafero v. State, 524 So.2d 987 (Fla.1987); Booker v. State, 503 So.2d 888 (Fla.1987); Witt v. State, 465 So.2d 510 (Fla.1985); Williams v. State, 557 So.2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

Affirmed.