Case ID: f-appx_332/html/0832-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kali A. HILL, a/k/a Eldridge L. Hill, a/k/a Kali, a/k/a Fly, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-6818.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 24, 2009.
    Decided: Oct. 5, 2009.
    Kali A. Hill, Appellant Pro Se.
    Peter Thomas Phillips, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kali A. Hill appeals the district court’s order summarily denying his motion to clarify the presentence report. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. See United States v. Hill, No. 2:03-cr-00162-PMD-1 (D.S.C. May 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.