Case ID: f-appx_309/html/0411-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PARK B. SMITH, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHF INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 2008-1320.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    Feb. 6, 2009.
    Richard A. DePalma, Thompson Hine, LLP, of New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Katheryn M. Ryan, Baker & McKenzie LLP, of New York, New York.
    Stephen L. Sulzer, Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was James P. Calve.
    Before MAYER, SCHALL, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

The district court’s grant of summary judgment of non-infringement to CHF Industries, Inc. was based upon the point of novelty test, which was eliminated by Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., 543 F.3d 665 (Fed.Cir.2008) (en bane). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is vacated and the case is remanded for reconsideration and further proceedings as appropriate in light of Egyptian Goddess.

COSTS

Each side shall bear its own costs.

VACATED AND REMANDED.