Case ID: sw3d_381/html/0396-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lance DRUDGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 96795.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Oct. 16, 2012.
    Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
    Chris Foster, Attorney General, Timothy A. Blackwell, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lance Drudge appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).