Case ID: so2d_174/html/0736-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. DREW, Chief Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bernard F. GRALL, Petitioner, v. Joseph RISDEN, Jr., d/b/a Risden’s Restaurant, Respondent.
    No. 33917.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    May 5, 1965.
    Farish & Farish, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.
    Jones, Adams, Paine & Foster, West Palm Beach, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

After careful re-examination of the record and briefs in this case in the light of the argument of counsel, we conclude that no such conflict has been demonstrated as justifies the exercise of jurisdiction by this court so—

The petition for certiorari is denied.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

DREW, C. J., dissents with opinion.

DREW, Chief Justice

(dissenting):

I think we clearly have jurisdiction. It is my view that the trial court should have submitted the issues to a jury for determination. I would quash the decision of the District Court.