Case ID: f-appx_563/html/0227-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

La’Tila D. ABBOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARKETSTAR CORP., Defendant-Appellee, and Phillipe Aquilina; Marketing Werks; Cynthia Snoot; Rosalin H. Hall-Smith; EEOC, Defendants.
    No. 13-2442.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 25, 2014.
    Decided: March 27, 2014.
    La’Tila D. Abbott, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Eugene Blue, Ray, Quinney & Nebeker, PC, Salt Lake City, Utah; Tillman J. Breckenridge, Reed Smith, LLP, Washington, DC; Betty S.W. Graumlich, Robert Miltz Luck, III, Reed Smith, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

La’Tila D. Abbott appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abbott v. MarketStar, No. 3:13-cv-00143-HEH-MHL, 2013 WL 5561617 (E.D.Va. Oct. 8, 2013). We deny Abbott’s pending petitions for mandamus, for a jury trial, and to enjoin a non-party from filing documents in this appeal, and her pending motion to suppress, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.