Case ID: ny-st-rep_31/html/0187-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "O’Gorman, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hannibal G. Cutugno, Resp’t, v. The Mayor, etc., of New York, App’lt.
    
      (New York Superior Court, General Term,
    
    
      Filed May 5, 1890.)
    
    Civil service—Interpreter op general sessions not within.
    The right to appoint an interpreter to the general sessions in New York city is vested in the recorder, city judge and judge of that court, and such appointments are not governed by the civil service law.
    Appeal from order of special term, sustaining demurrer by plaintiff to a portion of defendant’s answer.
    
      W. H. Olarh, for app’lt; LeBarbier & Brewster, for resp’t.
   O’Gorman, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendants to recover the sum of $999.96, as and for salary alleged by him to have been earned for his services as interpreter to the court of general sessions of the peace of the city and county of New York, between May 1, 1889, and November 1, 1889.

. The defendants, denying certain allegations of the complaint, further allege that the plaintiff had not been appointed in compliance with certain rules established for the regulation of the civil service of the state of New York.

To this part of the defendants’ answer the plaintiff demurred, on the ground that the defence therein contained was insufficient on the face thereof.

This demurrer was sustained at special term,.and the defendant appealed.

The right to appoint an interpreter to the general Sessions of the peace in the city of ¡New York is vested in the recorder, city judge and judge in the court of general sessions. Consolidation Act of the city of New York, §§ 1529,1531.

These appointments are not governed by the civil service laws.

I have not been able to ascertain the reasoning on which any contrary opinion has been founded.

- The appointment being thus made under authority of law, and the services having been rendered for the officers of the city making the appointment, the city is bound to pay the compensation that has been fixed by the Consolidation Act, § 1531.

The order sustaining the demurrer is affirmed, with costs.

Sedgwick, Ch. J., concurs.