Case ID: nj-eq_58/html/0581-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Catherine A. Salter et al., appellants, v. Stephen D. Ely et al., respondents.
    [Filed March 6th, 1899.]
    On appeal from a decree of the ordinary, whose opinion is reported in Salter v. Fly, 11 Dick. Ch. Rep. 357.
    
    
      
      Mr. Clarence Linn, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. John J. Ely and Mr. Woodbridge Strong, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given by the ordinary in his opinion.

For affirmance — -The Chief-Justice, Depue, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Bog-ert, Nixon, Hendrickson, Adams,- Vredenburgh — 14.

For reversal — None.