Case ID: sw3d_487/html/0492-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Janet PETERS, Appellant, v. Donald W. PETERS, Jr., Respondent.
    No. ED 103460
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    FILED: April 19, 2016
    Susan Kreher Roach, 8000 Maryland Avenue, Suite 760, Clayton, MO 63105, The Roach Law Firm, Attorney for Appellant.
    Michael Louis Sehechter, 8000 Maryland Avenue, Suite 950, Clayton, MO 63105, Sehechter Law Firm, P.C., Attorney for Respondent.
    Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Roy L. Richter, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Janet Peters appeals from the judgment denying her Amended Motion for Attorneys Fees on Appeal. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our - decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).