Case ID: ohio-law-abs_2/html/0708-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 737
    WEAVER v. REICHERT
    No. 18657.
    Supreme Court
    ON MOTION TO CERTIFY
    Pending on motion to order Hamilton Appeals to certify record.
    Docketed June, 14, 1924.
    2 Abs. 420.
    85. APPEAL. Does appeal lie from. Cincinnati Municipal Court to Common Pleas.
    Attorneys — Lester Butterworth and Wm. Madden, for Weaver; Otto Spangenberg, for Reichert; all of Cincinnati.
   Epitomized Opinion

Reichert recovered judgment on check against Weaver in Cincinnati Municipal Court. Weaver set up defense that the note was given for gambling debt and by cross-bill of particulars attempted to recover $165 lost by gambling in Reichert’s place. This was dismissed. He then appealed, a general appeal under 11215 GC., to the Common Pleas. Reich-ert moved to .strike appeal from files. Done. This was affirmed on rehearing by Court of Appeals.