Case ID: nj-eq_116/html/0145-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Leo Kauder, complainant-appellant, v. Solomon Lautman et al., defendants-respondents.
    [Decided March 4th, 1934.]
    
      Mr. Demid Goldstein, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Isaiah Matlock, for the respondents.
   Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 114 N. J. Eq. 197.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Case, Bodine, Donges, Peeskie, Hetfibld, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Paekee, Lloyd, Hehee, Yan Buskiek, Kays, JJ. 5.