Case ID: sw3d_552/html/0718-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Elbert A. WALTON, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. NORTHEAST AMBULANCE AND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, Defendant/Respondent, and Anthony D. Gray and Johnson Gray, LLC, Third-Party Defendants/Respondents.
    No. ED 105728
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: April 24, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 30, 2018. Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied August 21, 2018
    Dedra M. Brock-Moore, 4601 State Street, Suite 100B-1, East St. Louis, IL 62205, For Appellant.
    Richard K. Johnson, 319 N. Fourth Street, Suite 212, St. Louis, MO 63102, For Respondent Northeast Ambulance and Fire Protection District.
    Gino F. Battisti, William S. Clark, 101 S. Hanley Road, Suite 600, St. Louis, MO 63105, For Respondents Anthony D. Gray and Johnson Gray, LLC.
    Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Elbert A. Walton, Jr. (Appellant) appeals the trial court's summary judgment against him and in favor of Northeast Ambulance and Fire Protection District (the District), Anthony D. Gray (Gray), and Johnson Gray, LLC (Johnson Gray). Appellant also appeals from the trial court's denial of his motion to compel the District to arbitrate the parties' contract dispute and motion to disqualify Gray and Johnson Gray as defense counsel for the District. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b). 
      
      The District's Motion to Dismiss Appeal is denied. Appellant's request for an award of attorney's fees for responding to the District's Motion to Dismiss is denied.