Case ID: ga-app_30/html/0179-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

14226.
    Rosier v. The State.
    Decided April 11, 1923.
    Accusation of possessing liquor, etc.; from city court of Bichmond County — Judge Black. December 13, 1922.
    
      B. B. McGowen, for plaintiff in error.
    
      W. Inman Gurry, solicitor, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

1. There is no merit in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.'

(a) The conviction of the defendant not depending entirely upon circumstantial evidence, the court did not err, in the absence of a timely and appropriate written request, in failing to instruct the jury upon the law of circumstantial evidence.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.