Case ID: ad_252/html/0666-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jack A. Kaufman, Appellant, v. Goldman Stores Corporation, Respondent.
    
    First Department,
    December 23, 1937.
    
      
      Maurice Knapp of counsel [Murray C. Spett and Ralph H. Wiener with him on the brief; Weisman, Quinn, Allan & Spett, attorneys], for the appellant.
    
      Arthur A. McGivney of counsel [Walter T. Stern with bim on the brief; Stern & McGivney, attorneys], for the respondent.
    
      
       Affg. 161 Mise. 773.
    
   Per Curiam.

The determination of the Appellate Term should be affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the facts adduced in this record clearly show that the acts of the employee constituted an acceptance by him of the termination of the alleged oral employment agreement.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Determination unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements.