Case ID: so2d_455/html/0615-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hezekiah SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 83-989, 83-1651 and 83-1844.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Sept. 12, 1984.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Allen J. DeWeese, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Sarah B. Mayer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The sole issue meriting discussion is whether the trial court has jurisdiction to enter sanctions against a youthful offender for violating the terms of his community control program. Following our recent decision in Clem v. State (Fla. 4th DCA, Case No. 81-2243, opinion filed August 29, 1984), the trial court has jurisdiction to consider the violation of the terms of his community control program. Accordingly, we affirm and the same questions certified in Clem v. State, supra, are incorporated herein by reference and likewise certified.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.