Case ID: ala-app_31/html/0132-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SIMPSON, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

16 So.2d 203
    Edward HOLDEN v. STATE.
    8 Div. 251.
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    March 16, 1943.
    Rehearing Denied April 6, 1943.
    Jos. A. Padway, of Washington, D. C., and Merwin T. Koonce and A. A. Williams,both of Florence, for appellant.
    Wm. N. McQueen, Acting Atty. Gen., and L. S. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   SIMPSON, Judge.

This case, as to the two controlling questions presented by the appeal, is in pari‘ similibus with the cases of Lash v. State, ante, p. 121, 14 So.2d 235, and Threet v. State, post, p. 133, 16 So.2d 195, this day decided by this court.

In the said Lash and Threet cases, it was pointed out that an affirmance of the judgments of conviction, respectively, was due to be entered pursuant to an opinion delivered to this court by our Supreme Court. Code 1940, Title 13, Sec. 95.

Upon authority, therefore, of said cases (Lash and Threet), the judgment of the lower court in this case is ordered affirmed.

Affirmed.