Case ID: sw3d_543/html/0619-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rickey BASKERVILLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    WD 80021
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    ORDER FILED: JANUARY 30, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 27, 2018 Application for Transfer Denied May 1, 2018
    Susan Lynn Hogan, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.
    Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.
    Before Division Two: Anthony Rex Gabbert, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton, Judge, Gary D. Witt, Judge
    ORDER
   Per Curiam:

Rickey Baskerville appeals a motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, after the Missouri Supreme Court affirmed his convictions and sentences for three counts of capital murder. He contends the court clearly erred, because deficient appellate counsel prejudiced his appeal by failing to address two errors, after trial counsel preserved the alleged errors for appeal: 1) a prosecutor's misstatement of law during closing argument, and 2) the unlawful conditions of Baskerville's pre-trial detention. Rule 84.16(b).