Case ID: fla_113/html/0442-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard Ramos and Julio Cortez v. State.
    151 So. 705.
    Decision Filed January 4, 1934.
    Petition for Rehearing Denied February 7, 1934.
    
      Chester H. Ferguson, for Plaintiffs in Error;
    
      Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant, for the State.
   Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judg-. ment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Criminal Court of Record be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, Ellis and Buford, J. J., concur.

Davis, C. J., and Terrell, J., dissent.