Case ID: ga_155/html/0481-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Gilbert, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Moore, administrator, v. Walton et al.
    
    No. 3507.
    April 13, 1923.
    Rehearing denied June 7, 1923.
    Appeal. Before Judge Ellis. Eulton superior court. October 28, 1922. ■ . -
    
      McDaniel & Neely and J. M. M.oare, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Clement E. Sutton and Anderson, Rountree & Crenshaw, contra.
   Gilbert, J.

The exception in this case is to the first grant of a new trial; and therefore, in order to determine whether the verdict rendered by the jury was demanded, a proper brief of the evidence is essential. What purports to be a brief of the evidence consists, in the main, of a full stenographic report of the testimony, containing all of the questions to the witnesses and their answei's. This is not a sufficient compliance with the statute; and therefore the judgment is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.