Case ID: ill-app_44/html/0294-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Gary, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Peter W. Anderson v. Sven O. Olin et al.
    
      Practice—Assignment of Errors.
    
    Appellant having assigned no errors upon the record the appeal is dismissed;
    [Opinion filed April 29, 1892.]
    ■ Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Henry H. Shepard, Judge, presiding.
    Hr. .Frank F. Beed, for appellant.
    
      Messrs. Blanks & Chytraus, for appellee.
   Gary, J.

This is an attempt by the appellant to avoid by another bill in chancery the effect of a former suit to which he was a party, served with process, and which he neglected.

Probably we should find little difficulty in showing that the decree dismissing- the bill is right, if the question were before us; but no errors being assigned upon the record, although the appellees call attention in their brief to the omission, and the appellant files a reply, we can only dismiss the appeal without costs. Waixel v. Harrison, 35 Ill. App. 571.

Appeal dismissed.

Judge Shepard takes no part in this case.