Case ID: ny_236/html/0587-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Application of the Interocean Mercantile Corporation, Respondent, for the Appointment of an Arbitrator. Herman W. Hoops et al., Appellants.
    
      Practice — arbitration — motion for commission to take testimony without the state denied.
    
    
      Matter of Interocean Mercantile Corporation, 204 App. Div. 284, affirmed.
    (Argued May 29, 1923;
    decided June 12, 1923.)
    Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 17, 1923, which reversed an order of Special Term granting a motion for a commission to take testimony without the state and denied said motion. The following question was certified: “ Has the Supreme Court of the state of New York power to direct by order that a commission issue to take the testimony, upon interrogatories and cross interrogatories annexed thereto, of witnesses outside the state of New York, for use in an arbitration proceeding, directed by the order of the said Supreme Court, in which an arbitrator was appointed by the said court on the application of one of the parties to a written contract which provided that differences thereunder should be determined by arbitration, but which said contract was not acknowledged or proved as required by section 1449 of the Civil Practice Act.”
    
      Francis X. Carmody and Samuel Sculnick for appellants.
    
      Richard Krause and Edwin J. Johnson for respondent.
   Order affirmed, with costs; question certified answered In the negative; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting: Pound and Crane, JJ.