Case ID: tex-crim_91/html/0259-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HAWKINS, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Earl Mobley v. The State.
    No. 6848.
    Decided March 8, 1922.
    Theft of Automobile—Plea of Guilty—Statement of Pacts.
    In the absence of a statement of facts, the indictment being regular, and the judgment and sentence in proper form, matters set up in the motion for new trial cannot be considered on appeal, and the judgment is affirmed.
    Appeal from the District Court of Bexar. Tried below before the Honorable S. G. Tayloe.
    Appeal from a conviction of theft of an automobile; penalty, two years imprisonment in the penitentiary.
    The opinion states the case.
    No brief on file for appellant.
    
      R. G. Storey, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
   HAWKINS, Judge.

—Upon his plea of guilty appellant was convicted for the theft of an automobile and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Notwithstanding the plea of guilty he has perfected an appeal to this court. The record comes before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment is regular and the judgment and sentence are in proper form. The matters set up in the motion for new trial can not be considered in the absence of bills of exception and statement of facts and the regularity of the proceedings must be presumed.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.