Case ID: nj-eq_83/html/0345-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Henry D. Phillips, appellant, v. Jennie F. Phillips, respondent.
    [Submitted April 11th, 1914.
    Decided May 4th, 1914.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Baches, whose opinion is reported in 81 N. J. Eq. 459.
    
    
      Messrs. Yroom, 'Dickinson <& Scammell, for the appellant!
    
      Mr. Linton Satterllmcdte, for the respondent..
   Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons' stated in the opinion died in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baches.

For affirmance — The Chile-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Teenohard, Berg km, Minturn, EJaliscii, Bogert, Vredenbuegii, White, Hepplnheimer — 11.

For mversal — None.