Case ID: nj-eq_63/html/0804-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hiram E. Budd et al., complainants and appellants, v. The Camden Horse Railroad Company et al., defendants and respondents.
    [Filed June 23d, 1902.]
    
      Mr. Francis D. Weaver, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. Edward Ambler Armstrong, for the'respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated by Vice-Chancellor Grey in the opinion filed in the court below. See 16 Dick. Ch. Rep. 543.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom—14.

For reversal—None.