Case ID: f-appx_393/html/0115-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Scott STEELE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. Frederick MOTZ, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 10-1006.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 26, 2010.
    Decided: Aug. 31, 2010.
    
      Scott Steele, Appellant Pro Se. Judith Ann Kidwell, Office of the United States Attorney, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
    Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Scott Steele appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action against the district court judge who presided over a prior action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Steele v. Motz, No. 1:09-cv-00792-FPS (D.Md. Nov. 19, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.