Case ID: okla_165/html/0086-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GRANT v. HARRIS.
    No. 22234.
    Sept. 19, 1933.
    
      Everest, Dudley & Brewer, for plaintiff in error.
    Edwards and Robinson, for defendant in error.
   PER CURIAM.

M. L. Harris, the defendant in error herein, has moved the court to dismiss the appeal or in the alternative to' compel the giving of supersedeas bond or to award the right to issue execution.

On the ISth day of July, 1932, it was made to appear to this court that the bond formerly given herein to protect the right of M. L. Harris was entirely insufficient, and the court ordered the appellant to file an additional supersedeas bond in the amount of $3,500 within 20 days from the 8th day of July, 1932.

That bond -has not been filed, nor has any additional bond in lieu thereof been filed.

Under the authority of Kirk v. Leeman, 165 Okla. 261, 18 P. (2d) 1088, the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied, as the appellant has the right of appeal without regard to the worth of the supersedeas bond.

However, it was held therein that, unless the order of the court was complied with and a new bond made, the proper remedy for the defendant in error was to vacate the order superseding the right to issue execution and permit the plaintiff in the court below to seek such remedy by execution as be might wish.

The motion to dismiss is, therefore, denied, but it is the order of this court that the order superseding the judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county be, and the same is hereby, vacated and set aside, and the plaintiff below is permitted to issue execution as if no bond had been executed.