Case ID: ill_56/html/0044-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Linas W. Halliday v. John Shugart.
    
      Appeal—from a justice of the peace — when it will lie. After a trial in a suit before a justice of the peace, in which the jury failed to agree, the plaintiff dismissed his suit, and the justice thereupon taxed a part of the costs against the defendant: Held, the defendant had a right to appeal from the order of the justice as to costs, not perhaps for the purpose of having the costs re-taxed on the transcript of the justice, but for tbe purpose of a new trial, and after the trial to have the costs taxed by the court.
    Appeal from the Circuit Court of Bureau county; the Hon. Edwin S. Leland, Judge, presiding.
    The opinion states the case.
    Messrs. Fabwell & Heebon, for the appellant.
    Mr. G. G. Gibons, for the appellee.
   Per Curiam:

This was an action brought by Shugart against Halliday, before a justice. After a trial in which the jury did not agree and were discharged, the plaintiff dismissed the suit. The justice thereupon taxed a part of the costs against the defendant, who took an appeal to the circuit court. On motion of the plaintiff the court dismissed the appeal. This was error. Although the court might properly refuse to re-tax the costs on the transcript of the justice, yet the defendant had a right to a trial, and after the trial to have the costs taxed by the court. If the defendant preferred to take the risk of a trial rather than pay the costs taxed against him by the justice, it was his privilege to do so. He had a right to appeal from the order of the justice as to costs.

Judgment reversed.