Case ID: so2d_906/html/1139-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David Lee POWELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D05-868.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 15, 2005.
    Rehearing Denied Aug. 5, 2005.
    David Lee Powell, in proper person.
    Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before LEVY, C.J., and RAMIREZ, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sampson v. State, 798 So.2d 824, 826 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(finding that the issue of a general notice of enhancement was not preserved for appellate review because the defendant did not argue that the notice was deficient); Cook v. State, 816 So.2d 773, 774 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)(stating that “[t]he proper vehicle to challenge the State’s alleged failure to properly seek habitual felony offender sentencing is a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.”).