Case ID: ga-app_23/html/0809-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Wade, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

10368.
    Hemphill v. Cohutta Banking Company.
    Decided June 12, 1919.
    Complaint; from Murray superior court—Judge Wright presiding. January 6, 1919.
    
      Maddox, McCamy & Shumate, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Little, Powell, Smith & Goldstein, H. H. Anderson, R. N. Steed, W. E. Mann, W. C. Martin, contra.
   Wade, C. J.

The pleadings and the rulings of the lower court thereon ■ in this case being substantially the same as those in Leonard v. Cohutta Banking Co., 21 Ga. App. 777 (95 S. E. 113), the decision there made, that “the court did not err in its rulings on the' pleadings, nor in directing a verdict for the plaintiff,” is controlling, and the judgment of the trial judge is

Affirmed.

Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.