Case ID: bta_34/html/0654-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Sternhagen:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ned R. Harman, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
    Docket No. 79509.
    Promulgated June 2, 1936.
    
      Ned R. Harman pro se.
    
      James H. Teatman, Esq., for the respondent.
   OPINION.

Sternhagen:

The Commissioner regarded the $4,200 salary as exempt, but included the $5,848.30 transcript charges in the petitioner’s gross income and allowed him the deduction of the expenses paid in connection 'with it. The petitioner contends the entire amount is constitutionally immune from Federal tax. He regards himself as wholly an employee of the state, and his income of both classes as equally derived for the performance of his official statutory function, irrespective of the fact that the fees were not received from the state, but from others.

The question has never been presented for decision, although in Victor G. Marquissee, 11 B. T. A. 334; affd., sub nom Lewis v. Commissioner, 47 Fed. (2d) 32, such fees of official state court reporters were tacitly recognized as properly taxable. This, in our opinion, is the correct view. By statute in New York, the petitioner, if called upon by a party for a copy of the transcript, is required to furnish it at a charge of not more than 10 cents per folio, unless by voluntary agreement a higher charge is fixed; but such charges can not be regarded strictly as compensation derived from the state or for services performed for the state. The fact that they are regulated by the state makes them no less the subject of private arrangement, even though the petitioner is required, upon proper demand, to supply the transcripts. In this respect, he is in no different situation from carriers or innkeepers, who are under control of the state, are required to perform services and supply materials upon demand, and are limited in the charges which they may make therefor. Whether in fact to subject this income to Federal tax operates to the detriment of the state, can not be found from the evidence in this record, cf. Bew v. United States, 35 Fed. (2d) 977, nor can it be said that such inference is a priori so clear that it may be taken as a matter of law, cf. Miller v. McCaughn, 27 Fed. (2d) 128. The Commissioner’s determination is sustained.

Judgment will be entered for the respondent.