Case ID: nj-eq_99/html/0617-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Church, V. C.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frank J. Bock and Edward H. Wright, as receivers of New Jersey Refrigerating Company, petitioners, v. Columbia Brewing Company, a New Jersey corporation, defendant.
    [Decided May 21st, 1926.]
    Even where receivers and tbeir counsel do excellent work and sell the property involved to the best advantage, in fixing fees, consideration must be'given not only to the work done, but to the quantum of the estate, and an allowance of eighteen per cent, of the fund would be excessive.
    On application for allowances to receivers.
    
      
      Mr. J. Henry Harrison, for the petitioners.
    
      Mr. Merritt Lane, Messrs. Hudspeth & Demarest, Messrs. Perkins & Hrewin, Mr. D. Hugene Blankenhorn, Messrs. Fisk & Fisk, Mr. Shirley N. Carr, Messrs. Wall, Haight, Cm'ey & Hartpence, for the defendant.
   Church, V. C.

This is an application for allowances to counsel and receivers in the matter of the dissolution of the Columbia Brewing Company.

This was a subsidiary of the New Jersey Refrigerating Company, and its stock was owned by the refrigerating company. In the winding up of the affairs of that company it became necessary to appoint receivers for the subsidiary company in order that its assets might be sold and turned over to the parent corporation.

I appointed the same receivers whom I had appointed in the matter of the refrigerating company. They sold the property for $56,000, taking-a small payment in cash and a purchase-money mortgage of $42,000.

The receivers ask for $2,500 each and counsel for $5,000, and they have submitted statements which, in their opinion, justify these allowances. It should be noted that the amount asked for, $10,000, is nearly eighteen per cent, of the corpus of the estate.

While I have no doubt that the receivers and their counsel did excellent work and sold the property to the best advantage, I believe such a percentage of the estate for allowances is excessive. Consideration must be given, not only to the work done, but to the quantum of the estate. Unger v. Newlin Haines Co., 95 N. J. Eq. 16.

I will allow the receivers $1,000 each and counsel $2,500.