Case ID: f-appx_52/html/0924-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles RATHBUN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mark JOHNSON; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 01-17382.
    D.C. No. CV-00-06713-OWW.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 2, 2002.
    
    Decided Dec. 9, 2002.
    Before GOODWIN, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Charles Rathbun, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Wyatt v. Terhune, 305 F.3d 1033, 1042 (9th Cir.2002). We vacate and remand.

Our intervening decision in Wyatt dictates that we vacate and remand because it is not clear on the face of the amended complaint and exhibits thereto that Rathbun failed to exhaust. See id. at 1044 (holding that failure to exhaust is an affirmative defense that must be raised and proved by the defendant).

VACATED and REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.