Case ID: f-appx_613/html/0243-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nashibkuma PATEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. 7-ELEVEN, INC., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Seven and I Holdings Co., Ltd., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 14-2359.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 29, 2015.
    Decided: Aug. 25, 2015.
    Gerald A. Marks, Justin M. Klein, Marks & Klein, LLP, Red Bank, New Jersey, for Appellant. Joseph J. Aronica, Duane Morris LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
    Before KEENAN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nashibkuma Patel appeals the district court’s order dismissing his amended complaint against 7-Eleven, Inc., and denying his oral motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), 15(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Patel v. 7-Eleven, Inc., No. 1:14-cv-00664-GBL-TRJ (E.D.Va. Nov. 14, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.