Case ID: f-appx_434/html/0180-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bernard SCARBOROUGH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WALMART CORPORATION, f/k/a WalMart Super Center Stores, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 10-2152.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 24, 2011.
    Decided: June 3, 2011.
    Bernard Scarborough, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Stephen Clarke, Littler Mendelson, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Bernard Scarborough appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination and malicious prosecution action for failure to state a clam. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scarborough v. Walmart Corp., No. 3:10-cv-00263-GCM (W.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.