Case ID: f-appx_329/html/0385-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Michael CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-8415.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 30, 2009.
    Decided: Aug. 3, 2009.
    Michael Curtis, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Curtis appeals the district court’s order granting his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and reducing his sentence to 325 months of imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Curtis, No. 2:89-cr-00054-1 (S.D.W.Va. Oct. 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.