Case ID: ga-app_27/html/0056-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

12325.
    Hindsman v. The State.
    Decided May 11, 1921.
    Accusation of disturbing worship; from city court of Carroll-ton— Judge Hood. February 12, 1921.
    
      Emmett Smith, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Willis Smith, solicitor, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

There is no merit in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial. The evidence authorized the verdict; it is approved by the trial judge, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.