Case ID: ga-app_30/html/0284-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Beoyi.es, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

14341.
    Allen v. This State.
   Beoyi.es, C. J.

While the preponderance of the evidence was in the defendant’s favor, it cannot be held that his conviction was unauthorized by any evidence; and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere with it.

Decided May 16, 1923.

Accusation of possessing liquor; from city court of Dublin — Judge Sturgis. January 27, 1923.

T. P. Stephens, for plaintiff in error.

William Brunson, solicitor, contra. ■

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.