Case ID: ga-app_49/html/0139-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

23864.
    Roberts v. The State.
    Decided April 20, 1934.
    
      Price Edwards, for plaintiff in error.
    
      S. W. Ragsdale, solicitor-general, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

“In a criminal case, where the accused has exercised his statutory right to make a statement and the statement is contradictory of the testimony of the State’s witness [or witnesses], it is the duty of the trial judge, even in the absence of a written request, to instruct the jury that they have the right to believe the statement in preference to the sworn testimony.’’ (Italics ours.) Rivers v. State, 8 Ga. App. 694 (70 S. E. 47), and cit. Under the foregoing ruling and the facts of the instant case, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial must be and is Reversed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.