Case ID: nys_142/html/1124-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JARASHOW, Respondent, v. EMERY, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    May 29, 1913.)
    Action by Israel Jarashow against John W. Emery.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground that plaintiff has not shown complete performance, and has not sustained his burden of proof as to substantial performance, because he has not shown the value of the omitted work.

JENKS, P. J., and PUTNAM, J., dissent.