Case ID: ad3d_48/html/0286-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Santana, Appellant.
    [852 NYS2d 73]
   Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Margaret Clancy, J.), rendered February 23, 2006, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of five counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 10 to 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

Testimony regarding a narcotics sale by a codefendant in defendant’s presence did not deprive defendant of a fair trial. The evidence in question was relevant to a conspiracy count in the indictment that was still pending at that point in the trial, and evidence of the codefendant’s conduct was not prejudicial to defendant (see People v Delacruz, 24 AD3d 109 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 775 [2006]). Furthermore, the court’s limiting instruction was sufficient to prevent any possibility of prejudice.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Sweeny and Moskowitz, JJ.