Case ID: nj-eq_82/html/0366-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carlotta Heath, appellant, v. Frederick R. Maddock, respondent.
    [Argued June 30th, 1913.
    Decided November 17th, 1913.]
    On appeal from a decree made by the ordinary of the prerogative court, whose opinion is reported in 81. N-. J. Eq. (11 Buck.) iw.
    
    
      Messrs. Edward A. & William T. Day,-for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. Lum, Tamblyn & Colyer, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons 'stated in-the opinion filed in the court below by the ordinary.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaliscit, Vreden-BUHGI-I, CONGDON, WHITE, TERI-IUNE, ITePPBNHÉIMER-13.

■ ■ • For reversal—-None.