Case ID: f-appx_358/html/0995-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MEMORANDUM \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven KINNEY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-10306.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted Nov. 17, 2009.
    
    Filed Dec. 17, 2009.
    Nancy J. Koppe, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Robert Lawrence Ellman, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Camille W. Damm, Assistant U.S., Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Nancy J. Koppe, Esquire, Camille W. Damm, Robert Lawrence Ellman, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Steven Kinney, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Steven Kinney, Safford, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Steven Kinney appeals pro se from the district court’s May 29, 2008, order denying his requests for documents and to unseal a portion of the record. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Kinney’s post-judgment motions.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.