Case ID: us_292/html/0614-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 1075.
    Hall v. California.
    Jurisdictional statement submitted May 26, 1934.
    Decided June 4, 1934.
    
      Mr. Marshall B. Woodworth for appellant. No appearance for appellee.
   Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed (1) for the want of a properly presented federal question, Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U.S. 341, 343, 344; Appleby v. Buffalo, 221 U.S. 524, 529; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U.S. 692, 700; and (2) for the reason that the decision of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Mims, 242 U.S. 532, 535; Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. McGrew, 188 U.S. 291, 308; Hartford Life Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 249 U.S. 490, 493.