Case ID: f-appx_325/html/0227-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Tyrone SMITH, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 08-7113.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 21, 2009.
    Decided: May 26, 2009.
    
      Tyrone Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, Craig Jon Jacobsen, I, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Smith appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 8582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Smith, No. 7:01-cr-00092-jct-1, 2008 WL 2522618 (W.D.Va. June 24, 2008). See United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir.2009). We deny Smith’s motion to consolidate and appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.