Case ID: nys_101/html/1146-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SWEET, Respondent, v. PERKINS et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division. Fourth Department.
    November 14, 1906.)
    Action by Oscar H. Sweet against Charles H. Perkins and others.
   PER CURIAM.

Order denying motion for new trial on the ground of fraud and deceit practiced by plaintiff at the trial affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. See 101 N. Y. Supp. 163.

McLennan, P. j., and NASH, J., dissent.