Case ID: ga-app_31/html/0546-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodwokth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

15034.
    Smith et al. v. Marion Harper Cotton Oil Co.
    Decided January 16, 1924.
    Action for breach of contract; from Cobb superior court—Judge Blair. September 8, 1923.
    The allegations of the plaintiff’s petition are set out in 28 Ga, App. 663.
    
      Morris, Hawkins & Wallace, for plaintiff in error.
    
      J. Z. Foster, Little, Powell, Smith & Goldstein, contra.
   Bloodwokth, J.

The court properly directed a verdict for the plaintiff, and no legal reason for a reversal of the judgment is shown in any of the grounds of the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., eoneur.