Case ID: so2d_594/html/0869-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Brian JACKSON and Gina Jackson, Appellants, v. Vivien Woehler FEIT, as personal representative of the Estate of Gertrude Quillen, Appellee.
    No. 91-1085.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    March 11, 1992.
    J. Stephen Tierney, III, Neill Griffin Jef-fries & Lloyd, Chartered, Fort Pierce, for appellants.
    David N. Sowerby, Melville & Fowler, P.A., Fort Pierce, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We agree with appellants that the trial court erred in denying their motions to amend and for continuance. The manner in which this ease was set for trial violated both the letter and the spirit of Rule 1.440(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure (1991), concerning the method in which cases should be noticed and scheduled for trial. Cf. Ramos v. Menks, 509 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and POLEN, JJ., concur.