Case ID: ind_237/html/0701-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gray v. State of Indiana.
    [No. 0-498.
    Filed November 26, 1957.]
    
      Roscoe H. Gray, pro se.
    
   Per Curiam

Petitioner herein has attempted pro se to perfect an appeal to this court under Rule 2-40. The papers which he has filed contain no proper assignment of error, nor do they contain any of the record necessary to present the questions which petitioner is apparently attempting to raise, nor does it in any manner comply with the provisions of Rule 2-40.

The petition is insufficient to confer jurisdiction on this court under Rule 2-40, and for this reason it should be dismissed. Davis v. Pelley (1952), 230 Ind. 248, 251, 102 N. E. 2d 910; Bolden v. State (1955), 234 Ind. 708, 130 N. E. 2d 52.

Petition dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 145 N. E. 2d 896.