Case ID: f-appx_394/html/0088-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Marco Antonio MARTINEZ-PUENTE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-51099
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Sept. 1, 2010.
    Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    M. Carolyn Fuentes, Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before GARWOOD, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Marco Antonio Martinez-Puente pled guilty to illegal reentry after deportation. He was sentenced to 12 months of imprisonment, to be followed by one year of non-reporting supervised release. On appeal, Martinez-Puente argues only that his sentence is unreasonable because it is greater than necessary to accomplish the goals of sentencing under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

We do not reach the merits of the issue that he presents. Because Martinezr-Puente has prior to this date been released from federal custody and removed from the United States, he is subject only to an undischarged term of supervised release. We cannot grant what he requests because resentencing would require Martinez-Puente to be present at a hearing to consider a new sentence; his deportation creates a legal bar to such an appearance. United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 383 (5th Cir.2007). This appeal therefore has become moot.

The appeal is DISMISSED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.