Case ID: sw2d_924/html/0061-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHRYSLER CREDIT CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Peggy M. ST. CIN, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. 68603.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    June 18, 1996.
    F. Patrick Davis, William Z. Shobet, Finch, Bradshaw, Strom & Steele, Cape Girardeau, for appellant.
    Nelson L. Mitten, Riezman & Blitz, Clayton, for respondent.
    Before CRANE, C. J., AHRENS, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment awarding plaintiff creditor possession of a vehicle and $4,080.00 for damages and costs. We affirm.

The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).