Case ID: nj-eq_139/html/0310-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ruth Auman Norton, respondent, v. Mary M. Miller et al., appellants.
    [Submitted October 25th, 1946.
    Decided January 17th, 1947.]
    
      Mr. Francis J. Tanner, for the appellants.
    
      Messrs. Berry <& Whitson, for the respondent.
   Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Jayne, and reported at 133 N. J. Eq. 235.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Hei-ibr, Perskie, Come, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Wells, Baeebrty, Dill, Breund, McGeehan, McLean, JJ. 15.

For reversal — ISTone.