Case ID: ohio-law-abs_1/html/0348-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 331
    ANDERSON v. HOLUB
    Ohio Court of Appeals, Summit County
    No. 594.
    Jan. 5, 1923
    LIENS — (1) Plaintiff not entitled to lien on re; estate under the evidence.
    Attorneys — Underwood & Hutchison, for plaintif Sieber, Sieber & Amer, all of Akron, for defendan
   PER CURIAM.

Epitomized Opinion

The court here held that the plaintiff Andersc was not entitled to a lien upon the real estate b longing to defendant, but as the court was divide as to the reasons for so holding, no regular opinjc .was written.