Case ID: nj-eq_71/html/0790-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The Long Branch Commission, appellant, v. The Tintern Manor Water Company, respondent.
    [Argued July 13th, 1906.
    Decided February 2d, 1907.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery, advised by Vice-Chancellor Pitney, whose opinion is reported in 70 N. J. Eq. (J Robb.) 71.
    
    
      Mr. Clarence G. Temióte and Mr. Robert II. McCarter, attorney-general, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from in this case is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Pitney.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Fort, Hendrickson, Swayze, Reed, Trenci-iard, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray—12.

For reversal—None.