Case ID: f-cas_7/html/0313-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "THE COURT", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Case No. 3,718.
    DE BUTTS v. McCULLOCH.
    [1 Cranch, C. C. 286.] 
    
    Circuit Court, District of Columbia.
    March Term, 1806.
    Depositions—Notice or Taking.
    It is not necessary that the notice of taking a deposition under the act of congress should state the reason for taking it.
    DE BUTTS (McCULLOCH v.). See Case No. 8,730.
    E. J. Lee objected to the deposition of Joseph Grant, taken under the act of congress, that the notice did not state the reason of taking it.
   THE COURT

overruled the objection to the deposition, and suffered it to be read.