Case ID: f-appx_522/html/0912-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

APELDYN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU Optronics Corporation America, Defendants-Appellees, and Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Defendants.
    Nos. 2012-1172, 2012-1173.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    July 17, 2013.
    Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Sept. 13, 2013.
    
    Scott G. Seidman, Tonkon, Torp, Galen, Marmaduke & Booth, of Portland, OR, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Jon P. Stride and Don H. Marmaduke.
    Lawrence J. Gotts, Latham & Watkins LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees AU Optronics Corporation, et al. With him on the brief was Elizabeth M. Roesel. Of counsel on the brief were Terry D. Garnett, Vincent K. Yip, Peter J. Wied and Jay C. Chiu, Goodwin Procter LLP, of Los Angeles, CA.
    Donald R. McPhail, Cozen O’Connor, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, et al. With him on the brief was Barry Golob. Of counsel was Kristina Caggiano, Duane Morris, LLP, of Washington, DC.
    LOURIE, SCHALL, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       Circuit Judge Moore did not participate in the vote.
    
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged-.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.