Case ID: ny-super-ct_59/html/0575-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas Adams and Company, (Limited,) Respondents v. Saly I. Mayer, et al., Appellants.
    Decided January 5, 1891.
    Appeal from judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff upon the verdict of a jury and from order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
    David Leventritt, for appellants.
    MacFarland, Boardman & Platt, for respondents.
    Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Freedman, J.
   Per Curiam.

The issues in this case have been retried in conformity with the decision of this court upon the former appeal as reported in 56 N. Y. Superior Ct. R. 572. Upon a review of the case as now presented none of 'the exceptions taken constitutes, when all the circumstances are considered, sufficient ground for reversal, nór can it be held that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.