Case ID: sw2d_823/html/0538-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anthony GRAY, Petitioner/Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. 60178.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Feb. 25, 1992.
    Raymond Howard, Jr., St. Louis, for petitioner/appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Theodore A. Bruce, Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent/respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner appeals from a court order sustaining department’s motion to dismiss his petition for review. We affirm. The order of the trial court is not erroneous and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).