Case ID: sw3d_60/html/0055-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Brian Neal DUNCAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 79641.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Nov. 20, 2001.
    Rosalynn Koch, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for Appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, John M. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J., and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Brian Duncan, (“movant”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Francois County dismissing his pro se Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant contends the motion court improperly applied the escape rule in dismissing his Rule 24.035 motion. Movant seeks to vacate his conviction and sentence for receiving stolen property, section 570.080, RSMo 1978, for which movant was sentenced to five years imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).