Case ID: or-app_241/html/0195-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

On respondent’s petition for reconsideration filed November 30, 2010,
    reconsideration allowed; former disposition (238 Or App 582, 243 P3d 480 (2010)) withdrawn; convictions on Counts 2 and 3 reversed; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed February 23, 2011
    STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JACOB ALAN HARTMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
    
    Malheur County Circuit Court
    08051338C; A140036
    248 P3d 448
    John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Michael A. Casper, Assistant Attorney General, for petition.
    Before Wollheim, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

The state petitions for reconsideration of our decision in this case, State v. Hartman, 238 Or App 582, 243 P3d 480 (2010), arguing that this court erred in its disposition of the case. In our original opinion, we reversed the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence, and, consequently, we reversed and remanded the case. The state points out that the evidence at issue in defendant’s motion concerned only two of the seven counts of which defendant was convicted and, thus, our disposition properly should have been to affirm defendant’s convictions on the counts not affected by our reversal of the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress. The state’s point is well taken.

Reconsideration allowed; former disposition withdrawn; convictions on Counts 2 and 3 reversed; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.