Case ID: pa-super_255/html/0622-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

387 A.2d 920
    Commonwealth v. Truitt, Appellant.
    Argued September 15, 1977.
    James M. Potter, with him Liever, Hyman & Potter, for appellant;
    Bernard Mendelsohn, with him Baskin, Mendelsohn & Leisawitz, for Commonwealth, appellee.
   Order affirmed.

HOFFMAN, J., dissented on the grounds that the support order of the lower court is excessive. He would remand to re-evaluate the needs and relative incomes and assets of the parties.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.