Case ID: nys_66/html/1125-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

AMER et al., Respondents, v. FOLK et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    November 9, 1900.)
    Action by Edward O. Amer and another against John Folk and another. From a judgment and order of the general term of the city court (65 N. Y. Supp. 1127) affirming a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.
    Affirmed.
    Hastings & Gleason, for appellants. Blumensteil & Hirsch, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

The only question in this case was whether there had been an accord and satisfaction between the parties. This issue was submitted to the jury by a charge which correctly followed the opinion delivered when this case was here on a former appeal. Amer v. Folk, 28 Misc. Rep. 508, 59 N. Y. Supp. 532. The evidence was conflicting, and amply supported the judgment rendered against the defendants. The order denying the defendants’ motion to set aside the verdict is not appealable to this court. Judgment affirmed, with costs.