Case ID: so2d_842/html/0648-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WOODALL, Justice. \n      JOHNSTONE, Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte David CANIDATE. (In re David Canidate v. State of Alabama).
    1011656.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Aug. 16, 2002.
    Joel L. Sogol, Tuscaloosa, for petitioner.
   WOODALL, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

WRIT DENIED. NO OPINION.

MOORE, C.J., and HOUSTON and LYONS, JJ., concur.

JOHNSTONE, J., concurs specially.

JOHNSTONE, Justice

(concurring specially).

While the decision by the Court of Civil Appeals appears to conflict with Carlisle v. State, 512 So.2d 150 (Ala.Crim.App.1987), quoted at pages 1-7 of the petitioner’s brief, the petitioner has not invoked Rule 39(a)(1)(D), Ala. R.App. P., “conflict” as a basis for our certiorari jurisdiction.