Case ID: f-appx_375/html/0798-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John Ray MILLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jim BENEDETTI, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 08-16906.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 5, 2010.
    
    
      Filed April 15, 2010.
    John Ray Miller, Las Vegas, NV, pro se.
    Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Nevada state prisoner John Ray Miller appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of the motion for reconsideration he filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Miller contends the district court erred by denying his motion to reconsider. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Miller’s motion to reconsider because he presented no grounds justifying relief under Rule 60(b). See Backlund v. Barnhart, 778 F.2d 1386, 1388 (9th Cir.1985).

Miller’s motion to remand the case because the State did not file an answering brief is denied.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.