Case ID: so2d_303/html/0325-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Florida on the relation of Marie T. COLLIER, Petitioner, v. Thomas H. BARKDULL, Jr., Chief Judge, et al., Respondents.
    No. 45039.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Nov. 13, 1974.
    William Huggett, Miami, for petitioner.
    Kenneth L. Ryskamp, Bolles, Goodwin, Ryskamp & Welcher and Steven R. Berger, Carey, Dwyer, Austin, Cole & Sel-wood, Miami, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard the arguments of the parties. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged, but without prejudice to petitioner’s rights if any to recover for any losses she may have incurred by reason of failure of her counsel to protect her rights in this litigation.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN, DEKLE and OVERTON, JJ, concur.