Case ID: ga-l-rep_1/html/0347-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Hall, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Russell, Executor, vs. Hubbard.
    'Complaint, from City Court of Atlanta. Practice in Superior Court. Administrators and Executors. Comity. Set-off. Newly Discovered Evidence. (Before Judge Clarke.)
   Hall, J.

1. The striking of pleas because- filed after'default, and the allowance of judgment by default, are matters addres:ed tq the sound discretion of the court, and a refusal to strike pleas and -enter judgment will not be overruled, unless it appear that the discretion.of the court was grossly abused. 57 Ga., 25; 23d Rule of practice, Code, p; 1348. * ■

(a) Where there has .been an entry of an answer on the docket at the return term of the writ, the general issue shall be considered as filed, and that plea may be amended by filing others as a, matter of right, without delay and without the payment of costs, except .such as the court, in his discretion, may compel the amending party to pay his adversary, where there has been negligence in respect to the matter of amendment; and the court may further place upon him reasonable and equitable terms not touching the real merits of the cause in controversy.. Code, §§3458, 3482.

R. B. Barnes, for plaintiff in error.

Mynatt & Howell, for defendant.

2. Where a suit was brought in this state by a foreign executor,, on a cause of action accruing to the testator in his lifetime, the defendant could plead a set off as though the action had been instituted under letters of administration granted in this state; and the statutory requirements of the state of the administration as to the presentation and filing of claims against estates would not apply to such a defense. 13 Ga., 140; 5 Id., 357.

(a) There was no suggestion of insolvency, and therefore there-was no reason for such a verdict or judgment as would have been proper if plene adminiatravit or plene administravit praeter had been replied to-the set-off. The verdict conforms to the pleadings. If the judgment-does not conform to it, it may be amended; but no such point having been passed on below, it will not be determined here.

2. Newly discovered evidence which is merely cumulative, and-which might have been procured before the trial by the exercise of proper diligence, furnishes no ground for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.