Case ID: f2d_435/html/1307-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM;", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Basilisa GURION REMO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
    No. 24582.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Jan. 15, 1971.
    Dan P. Danliov, Seattle, Wash., for appellant.
    John N. Mitchell, Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., James L. Browning, U. S. Atty., David R. Urdan, Asst. U. S. Atty., Stephen M. Suffin, Atty., San Francisco, Cal., Eugene Cushing, U. S. Atty., John P. Boyd, Dist. Director, I. N. S., Seattle, Wash., for appellee.
    Before CHAMBERS, DUNIWAY and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM;

The facts of this case strikingly resemble those in Tomboc v. Rosenberg, 9 Cir., 1970, 427 F.2d 677. Under the principles there announced, we are unable to find an abuse of discretion here.

Affirmed.