Case ID: f2d_436/html/0419-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. John Patrick George HASLAM, III, Appellant.
    No. 25442.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Jan. 5, 1971.
    David K. Yamakawa, Jr. (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
    Alan H. Friedman (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Robert L. Meyer, David R. Nissen, Chief, Criminal Division, George G. Rayborn, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los An-geles, Cal., for appellee.
    Before CHAMBERS and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and CONTI, District Judge.
   PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this Dyer Act case is affirmed.

Qn the particular record here we find no error in denying a subpoena of a distant witness, in denying a subpoena for telephone company records in Florida, or in denying the appointment of an investigator. We find the Miranda (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694) point without merit. See United States v. Hilliker, 9 Cir., 436 F.2d 101, decided December 11, 1970.

Other points not here mentioned we find without merit.