Case ID: f-appx_711/html/0170-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Christopher Lee JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; Financials; Department of State; Goldman Sachs; JP Morgan Chase; Citigroup; Morgan Stanley; U.S. Treasury Department; Loyd Blank Fien; Jamie Diamon; James Gorman; U.S. Federal Reserve, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 17-2152
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: February 15, 2018
    Decided: February 16, 2018
    Christopher Lee Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Lee Johnson appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action without prejudice and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Dept of Justice, No. 6:17-cv-01844-MGL (D.S.C. Aug! 31 & Sept. 18, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED