Case ID: f-appx_191/html/0620-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gustavo REYES, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 05-10368.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 24, 2006.
    
    Filed July 26, 2006.
    Dawrence W. Rice, Jr., Esq., USF— Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Carolyn D. Phillips, Esq., Fresno, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: ALARCÓN, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Gustavo Reyes appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 78-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base and marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Reyes has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Reyes filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the briefs and the record, pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.