Case ID: fla_48/html/0318-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ed. Williams, Mc. Johnson, J. E. Haynesworth and I. E. Webster, Appellants, v. N. W. Hackett, Appellee.
    
    This case reversed as to claimants on the authority of Cato v. Easterlin, just decided.
    This case was decided by the court En Banc.
    
    Appeal from Circuit Court for Alachua county.
    The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
    
      Evans Haile for appellants.
    
      W. S. Broome for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

This case is practically on all fours with that of Cato v. Easterlin, just decided. There is no proof of the value of the property claimed by Haynesworth and Webster, nor any basis for the money decree against them, and as to them the decree must be reversed for further proceedings. We find no reversible error in the decree against the mortgagors, Williams and Johnson, and as to them the decree is affirmed.

The cost of this appeal is to be taxed against the appellee.

All concur, except Taylor, C. J., disqualified, and Carter, J., absent.