Case ID: cust-ct_1/html/0366-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 39159.
    Protests 64915-G, etc., of Lord & Taylor et al. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record certain items were held dutiable at 60' percent under paragraph 31 as articles in chief value of compound's of cellulose,. Amberg v. United States (T. D. 46204) and Abstract 37230 followed.. Embroidered: articles were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430.