Case ID: sw2d_936/html/0869-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael MAXWELL, Appellant. Michael MAXWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 66814.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Jan. 7, 1997.
    Judith C. LaRose, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Michael Maxwell, appeals the judgment of conviction for delivery of a con-troEed substance, RSMo § 195.211 (Cum. Supp.1990), entered by the Circuit Court of Ralls County after a jury trial. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of conviction is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). 
      
      . As appellant’s brief raises no issues pertaining to the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, his appeal from that judgment is deemed abandoned. State v. Gaines, 807 S.W.2d 678 n. 1 (Mo.App. E.D.1991).