Case ID: nj-eq_63/html/0802-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edward G. Duffy, complainant and appellant, v. Alfred Hargan et al., defendants and respondents.
    [Filed June 23d, 1902.]
    
      Mr. James R. Nugent, for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. Sommer & Adams, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated by Vice-Chancellor Stevens in the opinion delivered in the court below. See 17 Dick. Ch. Rep. 588.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Vooritees, Vroom —15.

For reversal—None.