Case ID: so2d_518/html/0963-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael Fitzgerald LEE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 85-2612.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Jan. 19, 1988.
    H.T. Smith, Miami, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
    Before BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court, and, pursuant to our directions, a de novo hearing on the defendant’s motion to suppress was conducted. See Lee v. State, 499 So.2d 66 (Fla.3d DCA 1987). The trial court again denied the motion to suppress, and we affirm. Roman v. State, 475 So.2d 1228 (Fla.1985); Kee v. State, 504 So.2d 1365 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Williams v. State, 403 So.2d 453 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); James v. State, 223 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969).

Affirmed.