Case ID: f-appx_676/html/0610-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Margots KAPACS Plaintiff-Appellant v. Anita JUREVICA, et al. Defendants-Appellees
    No. 16-1885
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: February 7, 2017
    Filed: February 9, 2017
    Margots Kapacs, Pro Se
    Lawrence Herman Crosby, Jay Olson, Crosby & Associates, Saint Paul, MN, for Defendants-Appellees Anita Jurevica, Lawrence Herman Crosby, Jay Olson
    Andrew Tweeten, Assistant Attorney General, Attorney General’s Office, Saint Paul, MN, for Defendants-Appellees Judge Martha Holton Dimick, Minnesota Court of Appeals
    Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Margots Kapacs appeals after the district court dismissed his pro se complaint alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. Upon careful review, we conclude the action was properly dismissed for the reasons stated in the district court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommenda-tíons of the Honorable Franklin L, Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.