Case ID: so2d_619/html/0522-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WOLF, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David J. BYRNES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-1133.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 22, 1993.
    Appellant, pro se.
    No appearance by the State.
   WOLF, Judge.

Appellant petitioned the circuit court for a writ of mandamus, arguing that he was improperly denied restoration of forfeited gain time. Appellant failed to demonstrate he had exhausted available administrative remedies, and we therefore affirm without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a new petition correcting these deficiencies. See Tunstall v. Folsom, 616 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

SMITH and MICKLE, JJ., concur.