Case ID: ny-super-ct_59/html/0589-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frederick K. Keller, Respondent v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, et al., Appellants.
    Decided May 11, 1891.
    Appeal by defendants from judgment entered upon findings and conclusions made at special term.
    Edward B. Thomas, attorney and of counsel, for appellants.
    Edwin M. Felt, attorney and of counsel, for respondent.
    Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., Freedman and Ingraham, JJ.
   The question involved was whether certain findings and conclusions were inconsistent. The Court (per Curiam) held, that' on a fair construction they were not, and affirmed the judgment, with costs.