Case ID: nj-super_137/html/0219-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDITH M. RUSSELL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Supei’ior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
    Submitted November 12, 3975
    Decided November 24, 1975.
    Before Judges Matthews, Lora and Morgan.
    
      Mr. Donald L. Garber, attorney for appellant.
    
      Mr. Joseph C. Woodcock, Jr., Bergen County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Mr. Robert A. Bresin, Assistant Prosecutor, on the brief).
   Per Curiam.

We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Pressler for the Bergen County Court which is reported at 135 N. J. Super. 154 (Law Div. 1975). See also, State v. Bucich, 134 N. J. Super. 111 (App. Div. 1975), certif. den. 68 N. J. 280 (1975).