Case ID: sw2d_925/html/0505-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Adam E. YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 51392.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    July 23, 1996.
    Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before ULRICH, C.J., and FENNER and BRECKENRIDGE, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Adam Young appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion because trial counsel was ineffective for refusing to allow him to testify.

Judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).