Case ID: p2d_661/html/0683-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DUBOFSKY, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William A. DAWSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ed NELSON, Sheriff of Arapahoe County, State of Colorado, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 82SA313.
    Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.
    April 18, 1983.
    David F. Vela, Colorado State Public Defender, Saskia A. Stephenson, Deputy State Public Defender, Littleton, for petitioner-appellant.
    J.D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Charles B. Howe, Deputy Atty. Gen., Joel W. Cantrick, Sol. Gen., Patricia A. Wallace, Asst. Atty.Gen., Denver, for respondent-appellee.
   DUBOFSKY, Justice.

The petitioner-appellant, William Dawson, appeals the Arapahoe County district court’s discharge of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court discharged the writ because the warrant and supporting documents substantially charged the petitioner with the crime of murder in California. On appeal, the petitioner claims that extradition should be denied because he was detained for longer than 30 days after his arrest, in violation of section 16-19-116, C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8). We affirm the district court’s discharge of the petition.

The petitioner was arrested in Arapahoe County on March 11, 1982, based on a report that listed the vehicle he was driving as stolen. He appeared in court on April 15, 1982, 35 days later. Colorado authorities served the petitioner with the Colorado governor’s warrant on or about May 13, 1982. The petitioner filed a petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus on May 14, 1982. The district court discharged the writ on May 20, 1982.

The petitioner contends on appeal that his detention contravenes the mandate of section 16-19-116 that a fugitive awaiting requisition documents be committed to the county jail “for such a time not exceeding thirty days.” For the reasons stated in our opinion in Casler v. Nelson, 661 P.2d 1166 (Colo.1983) we find the petitioner’s argument to be without merit.

Judgment affirmed. 
      
      . Section 16-19-116 provides:
      “If from the examination before the judge it appears that the person held is the person charged with having committed the crime alleged and, except in cases arising under section 16-19-107, that he has fled from justice, the judge shall, by a warrant reciting the accusation, commit him to the county jail for such a time not exceeding thirty days and as specified in the warrant as will enable the arrest of the accused to be made under a warrant of the governor on a requisition of the executive authority of the state having jurisdiction of the offense, unless the accused gives bail as provided in section 16-19-117, or until he is legally discharged.”