Case ID: wend_19/html/0009-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      By the Court, Nelson, Ch. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bridgman vs. Gregory & Bloodgood.
    An order for a bill of particulars is duly served by delivering a copy; the ‘ original need not be shown.
    The question here was, whether the original order for a August, 1837. bill of particulars must be shown to the party called on for the bill, or whether service of a copy is sufficient.
   By the Court, Nelson, Ch. J.

All orders which do not-require personal service, may be served by copy. See 1 Archb. Pr. 23. So also it was held by this court in The Utica Bank v. Kibby, 7 Cowen, 148.