Case ID: ad2d_302/html/0539-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edna Johnson, Appellant.
    [755 NYS2d 267]
   Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lipp, J.), rendered December 20, 1995, convicting her of manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant did not preserve for appellate review her contention that the justification defense was not disproven beyond a reasonable doubt (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]; People v Nery, 243 AD2d 585 [1997]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to disprove the defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court erred in its justification charge is unpreserved for appellate review because she did not except to the charge as given (see CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the Supreme Court essentially gave the defendant the charge she requested concerning the factual issue of whether the store was her dwelling (but see People v Hernandez, 98 NY2d 175, 182-183 [2002]), by telling the jury that the defendant had no duty to retreat if she were in her own dwelling.

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 83 [1982]). Krausman, J.P., Schmidt, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.