Case ID: ark_326/html/0468-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

O.C. WILLINGHAM v. STATE of Arkansas
    CR 96-1222
    932 S.W.2d 751
    Supreme Court of Arkansas
    Opinion delivered October 28, 1996
    
      Honey & Honey, P.A., by: Charles L. “Chuck” Honey, for appellant.
   Per Curiam.

Appellant O.C. Willingham, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the record was not timely filed, but neither appellant nor his current attorney admit fault. As such, the motion for rule on the clerk does not state good cause for granting the motion as discussed in our per curiam, In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979). If appellant’s current attorney, Charles L. Honey, will concede by affidavit that it was his fault that the record was not filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted. The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.