Case ID: misc_49/html/0644-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Scott, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George Freeman, Respondent, v. Joseph Polstein, Appellant.
    Big. ,rs — Compensation — Right to compensation — Employment by person sought to he charged: Failure to consummate.
    Appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, Twelfth District, borough of Manhattan.
    Samuel Sturtz, for appellant.
    Respondent filing no brief.
   Scott, J.

This is an action by a real estate broker for commissions. Unlike most of such actions, it is brought against the purchaser. The plaintiff brought to defendant’s attention some houses which were for sale and was authorized to buy them upon certain terms. The sale was never consummated, and the property was sold' to some one else. Plaintiff, persisting, next solicited authority from the defendant to negotiate for the purchase of the contract of sale. He was unable, however, to negotiate such a purchase on terms acceptable to the defendant; and, while he was working, at it, another broker stepped in and procured an offer acceptable to and accepted by defendant.. To charge a purchaser with liability for commissions requires satisfactory proof of a special contract to that effect; for, in the usual course of business, it is the seller, and not the purchaser, who pays the commission. There is no proof of such a contract, and there is positive proof that plaintiff never brought about the sale. Doubtless he was active and energetic in his efforts, but he failed. There is nothing in the evidence to justify the judgment. Upon the plaintiff’s own testimony, the complaint should have been dismissed.

Glegbrioh and Geexenbatjm, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event