Case ID: f-cas_10/html/0467-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BLATCHFORD, District Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Case No. 5,476.
    In re GLASER.
    [2 N. B. R. 398 (Quarto, 129).] 
    
    Circuit Court, S. D. New York.
    1869.
    •Contempt — Examination op Witnesses under Commission — Bankruptcy Practice.
    On an application for attachment of witnesses .for contempt in not mnkinsr answers on examination under a commission, held, that attachment must be refused, for. the reason that no written interrogatories accompanied the commission, and no information furnished as to the ■ particular enquiry.
    [In bankruptcy. In the matter of Samuel ■Glaser.]
    Martin & Smith, for application.
    Benedict & Boardman, opposed.
    
      
       [Reprinted by permission.]
    
   BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

The commission issued by the district court for the southern district of Ohio, not being accompanied by any written interrogatories, and not furnishing any information as to what the en-quiry is, to which the examination of the witnesses named in it is to be directed, so that I can determine whether the questions which the witnesses have refused to answer, are or . are not pertinent to such enquiry; it is impossible for me to hold that the witnesses have refused to answer any pertinent or proper •question. The application for the attachment is, therefore, refused.