Case ID: f-appx_416/html/0874-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Naval Murillo RUIZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 10-11713
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    March 3, 2011.
    Anne R. Schultz, Wifredo A. Ferrer, U.S. Attorney, Kathleen M. Salyer, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for PlaintiffAppellee.
    Sowmya Bharathi, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Kathleen M. Williams, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Naval Ruiz Murillo, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before EDMONDSON, PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Sowmya Bharathi, appointed counsel for Naval Murillo Ruiz in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Murillo Ruiz’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.