Case ID: cust-ct_3/html/0459-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dallinger, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 42564.
    Protests 763073-G, etc., of Imoto Bros. et al. (New York).
   Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel certain bookends and banks were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339. Bookends and bridge table pencil holders plated with silver were held dutiable at 50 percent under the same paragraph. Woolworth v. United States (26 C. C. P. A. 221, C. A. D. 20), United States v. Friedlaender (21 id. 103, T. D. 46445) and Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816) cited.