Case ID: ad3d_90/html/1055-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of R. Bertil Peterson, Petitioner, v State of New York Department of Motor Vehicles et al., Respondents.
    [934 NYS2d 837]
   The determination that the petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1225-c is supported by substantial evidence. The petitioner’s challenge to the administrative determination rests upon an issue of credibility which was primarily for the fact-finder to resolve, and we see no basis to overturn the factfinder’s determination (see Matter of Hildreth v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs. Appeals Bd., 83 AD3d 838 [2011]). Dillon, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.