Case ID: sw2d_871/html/0135-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael HARVEY, Claimant/Appellant, v. ST. LOUIS ART MUSEUM, Employer/Respondent, and Continental Insurance Co., Insurer/Respondent.
    No. 64332.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    March 1, 1994.
    David M. Kenyon, St. Louis, for claimant/appellant.
    R. Kent Schultz, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before CRANE, P.J., and KAROHL and CRAHAN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge denying compensation. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).