Case ID: pa_422/html/0488-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Jones,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lynch v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Appellant.
    Argued May 4, 1966.
    Before Bell, C. J., Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.
    
      Arthur W. Leibold, Jr., with him Barton J. WinoImr, Owen B. Rhoads, and Beehert, Price & Rhoads, for appellant.
    
      Tom P. Monteverde, with him Charles W. Woolever, and Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, for appellee.
    September 27, 1966:
   Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

Subsequent to a jury verdict in favor of Averlean Lynch against Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (Metropolitan) in an assumpsit action in the Court of Common Pleas No. 7 of Philadelphia County, Metropolitan filed motions for judgment n.o.v. or, in the alternative, a new trial. On November 8, 1965, the court below entered an order dismissing Metropolitan’s motions. From that order the instant appeal was taken.

No judgment on the verdict has ever been entered. In the absence of such judgment no appeal lies. In Menyo v. Sphar, 409 Pa. 223, 224 (footnote), 186 A. 2d 9, we recently said: “Too many members of the Bar mistakenly believe that tbe appeal is from an Order which dismissed their motion for a new trial, instead of from a judgment which was entered on the verdict: [citing authorities].” See also: Denmon v. Rhodes, 416 Pa. 568, 569, 207 A. 2d 860; Gelzhiser v. Fisher, 418 Pa. 88, 208 A. 2d 836.

The instant appeal, being premature, must be quashed. 
      
       The stipulation entered into between the parties’ counsel and approved by the court below as to the amount of the verdict and the interest thereon cannot be construed to take the place of a judgment entered on the verdict.