Case ID: ad_275/html/0847-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ellen M. Garland, Respondent, v. Clarence F. Garland, Appellant.
   Under the circumstances here shown, counsel fee should not have been allowed. (Beadleston v. Beadleston, 103 N. Y. 402, 404; McCarthy v. McCarthy, 137 N. Y. 500; Fishman v. Fishman, 275 App. Div. 777.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.