Case ID: f-appx_566/html/0269-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James Andrew LACOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IAC, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 13-2507.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 17, 2014.
    Decided: April 21, 2014.
    James Andrew Lacoy, Appellant Pro Se. William Patrick Bingle, Thomas J. Gibney, Eastman & Smith, Ltd, Toledo, Ohio, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Andrew Lacoy appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief in his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lacoy v. IAC, No. 3:13-cv-00273-MOC-DCK, 2013 WL 6056597 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 2013). Lacoy’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.