Case ID: minn_166/html/0495-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HUGH S. McGINLEY v. IDA L. McGINLEY.
    
    January 28, 1926.
    No. 25,101.
    Divorce vacated.
    Order vacating decree of divorce granted plaintiff for cruel and inhuman treatment was affirmed, being proper exercise of judicial discretion. [Reporter.]
    Action in the district court for Hennepin county for absolute divorce. Defendant did not answer or appear at trial. The case was tried before Bardwell, J., who ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff. Plaintiff appealed from an order vacating the judgment.
    Affirmed.
    
      A. M. Breding, for appellant.
    
      Donald G. Hughes and P. A. Cosgrove, for respondent.
    
      
       Reported in 206 N. W. 954.
    
   PER CURIAM.

Appeal from an order entered on July 29, 1925, setting aside and vacating a .certain judgment and decree of divorce, made and entered on May 6, 1925, wherein the plaintiff was granted a divorce from the defendant upon the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. The matter was heard upon the return of an order to show cause. The parties appeared, with their respective attorneys, and the matter was fully heard and submitted upon certain affidavits, the summons and complaint, the files and records and arguments of counsel. The order to show cause was heard by the same judge who made the order granting the divorce. The showing made a clear case for the exercise of judicial discretion on the part of the court, and we are well satisfied with the disposition made of the matter by the learned trial judge. There was no abuse of discretion and the order appealed from should be and is affirmed.

Affirmed.