Case ID: ga-app_37/html/0351-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Brovles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

18321.
    Beavers v. Howell.
    Appeal and Error, 4 C. J. p. 864, n. 32, 33; p. 865, n. 36. New Trial, 29 Cyc. p. 942, n. 95.
    Decided November 16, 1927.
   Brovles, C. J.

1. None of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial (many of them too incomplete within themselves to be considered) shows cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

2. There was some evidence authorizing the verdict, and, the finding of the jui’y having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

10, Trover; from city court of Americus—Judge Harper. 1927.

James A. Fori, for plaintiff in error. Zach. Childers, contra.