Case ID: so2d_914/html/1084-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eddie Termaine NEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D05-2342.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Nov. 30, 2005.
    Eddie Termaine Neal, Indiantown, pro se.
    Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Hyndman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Eddie Termaine Neal (Defendant) appeals from an order striking, for lack of jurisdiction, his motion for DNA evidence examination, filed pursuant to rule 3.853, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We reverse and remand for the trial court to consider the merits of the motion.

In striking Defendant’s rule 3.853 motion, the trial court explained that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the matter due to the pending appeal of the denial of Defendant’s motion for postconviction relief, filed pursuant to rule 3.850. Before Defendant filed his motion, this court had affirmed the appeal, and by the time the trial court issued the challenged order, this court’s mandate had already issued. Moreover, even if the postconviction appeal had still been pending, that should not have deprived the trial court of jurisdiction to consider Defendant’s rule 3.853 motion, which raised wholly unrelated matters. Newberry v. State, 827 So.2d 387 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

Accordingly, the order on appeal is reversed and the matter is remanded for the trial court to consider the merits of the rule 3.853 motion.

Reversed and Remanded for further proceedings.

GUNTHER, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.