Case ID: ad2d_247/html/0203-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

1009 Second Avenue Associates, Respondent, v Benenson Capital Company et al., Appellants. (And Other Actions.)
    [668 NYS2d 351]
   Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Cans, J.), entered March 25, 1997, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by defendants-appellants’ brief, granted plaintiffs motion to compel compliance with items 1, 4, 5 and 6 of its supplemental notice of discovery and inspection, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of denying the motion as to documents requested in items 4, 5 and 6, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The record fails to support the motion court’s determination that the disclosure of documents requested in items 4, 5, and 6 of plaintiffs supplemental notice for discovery and inspection are material and necessary to plaintiffs action. Indeed, plaintiff did not attempt to justify its request for these materials on the motion.

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.