Case ID: ohio-st-3d_124/html/0474-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Satterfield, Appellant.
    [Cite as State v. Satterfield, 124 Ohio St.3d 474, 2010-Ohio-725.]
    
      (No. 2008-1424
    Submitted January 13, 2010
    Decided March 4, 2010.)
    Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Paula E. Adams, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
    Roger W. Kirk, for appellant.
   {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed as to the court of appeals’ holding on the retrospective application of H.B. 137 on the authority of State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434, 920 N.E.2d 958. R.C. 2929.191 may not be applied to a sentence entered prior to July 11, 2006.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Lanzinger, J., in State v. Singleton.