Case ID: misc2d_154/html/0760-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mark Blecher, Appellant, v Richard Colletti, Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    February 1, 1993
    APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Novick, Edelstein, Reisman, Lubell, Wasserman & Leventhal, P. C., New York City (Paul Finkelstein of counsel), for appellant. AIDS Service Center HIV Law Project, New York City (Theresa M. McGovern and Martha S. Jones of counsel), for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order affirmed with $25 costs.

The parties to this nonpayment proceeding entered into a lease which provided for a discounted rent, the rent being discounted to bring it within the maximum that the Department of Social Services (DSS) would pay, and which further provided that the discount would be forfeited if, inter alla, either party commenced a legal action. When DSS failed to timely pay the second and third months’ rent, landlord commenced this proceeding, seeking to recover the full nondiscounted rent. The trial court struck as unconscionable (Real Property Law § 235-c) the condition providing for a forfeiture of the discount upon either party’s commencement of a legal action. We affirm. The clause in question improperly impinges upon rights granted by the Rent Stabilization Code, inter alla, and is unenforceable. We note the error in payment of rent was promptly corrected.

Aronin, J. P., Joy and Scholnick, JJ., concur.