Case ID: f-appx_474/html/0974-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Drako O. SULLIVAN, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 12-6579.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 26, 2012.
    Decided: Aug. 2, 2012.
    Drako dandis Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Burke Moorman, Office of The United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Drako O. Sullivan appeals the district court’s oral orders denying his self-styled “Motion to Correct Procedural Default” under Fed.R.Crim.P. 32 and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See United States v. Sullivan, No. 6:01-cr-00898-HMH-l (D.S.C. Mar. 6, 2012 & Mar. 15, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.