Case ID: ad2d_18/html/0906-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Julius Kirzon, Appellant, v. Louis Marcus Corp., Respondent.
   Appeal from order entered November 20, 1961, made on motion of the Justice presiding denying the application for ¡a preference in this action for personal injuries, unanimously dismissed, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-respondent. No appeal lies from an ex parte order. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 609; Weisberg v. McGuigan, 12 A D 2d 450; Gouvakis v. 490 Tenth Ave. Corp., 6 A D 2d 1035.) Appellant’s remedy is a motion for reconsideration. (Vallen v. Fifth Ave. Coach Corp., 5 A D 2d 769.) Concur — Rabin, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.