Case ID: f-appx_6/html/0648-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bradly M. CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James SCHARF; P. Skovold; Mindy Richardson, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 97-36011. D.C. No. CV-96-01678.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 12, 2001 .
    Decided March 29, 2001.
    Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      . The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, we deny appellant’s request for oral argument.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Bradly Cunningham, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing with prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo and affirm. See Barnett v. Centoni, 31 F.3d 813, 816 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam); see also Wash.Rev.Stat. § 4.24.470.

AFFIRMED. 
      
      . This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.