Case ID: f-appx_333/html/0492-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Scott ALDRIDGE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-10646
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Sept. 22, 2009.
    Patricia D. Barksdale, Jacksonville, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Jeffrey Scott Aldridge, Salters, SC, pro se.
    Before BIRCH, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Roland Falcon, appointed counsel for Jeffrey Scott Aldridge, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Aldridge’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.