Case ID: scl_19/html/0373-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John Taylor, jr. v. George Purvis.
    
      Chesterfield — Fall Term, 1833.
   Whether a credit indorsed on a note, was on ac" count of a payment actually made, or voluntary, and intended to bring the case within the summary jurisdiction, is a question for the determination of the Circut Court. The sum. pro. jurisdiction of the court is limited to £20 sterling, equal to $85 71 3-7; and where the plaintiff’s demand, at the time of action brought, was within the jurisdiction, but at the time trial, by the accumulation of interest, exceeded it, the plaintiff at his election, may take judgement to the extent of the jurisdiction, or declare, and transfer the case to the general jurisdiction. (Vide Gracey & Co. Wright, 2 M’C. 278.)