Case ID: f-appx_566/html/0216-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Fernando Miguel NUNEZ, Petitioner.
    No. 14-1061.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 1, 2014.
    Decided: April 11, 2014.
    Fernando Miguel Nunez, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Fernando Miguel Nunez petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court entered an order and judgment on March 24, 2014, denying relief on Nunez’s § 2255 motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Nunez’s case, we deny the mandamus petition, amended petition, and corrected petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.