Case ID: nj-eq_104/html/0205-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary M. Schultz et al., respondents, v. Louis Pollock et. al., appellants.
    [Decided February 4th, 1929.]
    
      Mr. Michael J. Tansey, for the respondents.
    
      Mr. J. Harry Levin, for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the' court below by YiceChancellor Church, and reported in 103 N. J. Eq. 157.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Tkeetchakb, PakKEK, KaLISCH, KatZEETBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, Yah Buskibk, McGleetetoet, Kays, Heteield, Deak, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.