Case ID: la-ann_22/html/0118-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Taliaferro, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 2578.
    Citizens’ Bank of Louisiana (William T. Brooks, Subrogated), v. Marius L. Bringier.
    A judgment against a garnishee, predicated on answers to interrogatories,«will not be disturbed on a* peal, where no evidence was offered by the defendant on trial of the garnishment in the court below,
    A PPEAL from the Fourth Judicial District, Parish of Ascension. íjl Beauvais, J.
    
      Glarh, Bayne & Bensluiw, for plaintiffs and appellees. William 0. Lames, for defendant and appellant. Trist & Oliver, for garnishees.
   Taliaferro, J.

The plaintiffs obtained judgment on the twenty-second of November, 1866, against the defendant for five hundred and eighty dollars, with interest. Prom this judgment .the defendant has never appealed. Tho plaintiffs, on the twenty-third of November, 1868, issued an execution, upon which the sheriff returned that he had seized, as property of the defendant, certain promissory notes in the hands of Benjamin Smead and wife. Subsequently they made the last-named parties garnishees, and propounded interrogatories to them touching their indebtedness to the defendant. The answers elicited the acknowledgment that they owed the defendant a sum exceeding the amount of the. judgment the plaintiffs obtained against the defendant. There was judgment accordingly rendered against the garnishees, in which they acquiesced. The defendant, however, has taken an appeal; but, as he introduced no evidence in the case on the trial in the lower court against the garnishees,- and we find nothing authorizing us to alter the judgment, it must remain undisturbed.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the district court be affirmed, with costs in both courts.