Case ID: f-appx_629/html/0570-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David A. BARDES, individually, as a taxpayer, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L. Patrick AULD, Magistrate Judge; Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge; Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior U.S. District Judge; Robert Carr, Ex-Magistrate Judge, in their individual and official capacities; US Courts; United States of America; US Department of Justice; John and Jane Does, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 15-2396.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 14, 2016.
    Decided: Jan. 19, 2016.
    David A. Bardes, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David A. Bardes appeals the district court’s orders dismissing Ms civil complaint as frivolous and denying his motion for reconsideration. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See Bardes v. Auld, No. 1:15-cv-00214-MR-DLH, 2015 WL 5796466 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2015 & Nov. 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.