Case ID: ohio-st-3d_5/html/0145-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cincinnati Bar Association v. Ebel.
    [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Ebel (1983), 5 Ohio St. 3d 145.]
    (D.D. No. 83-11
    Decided June 8, 1983.)
    
      
      Ms. Susan J. Dlott, Mr. Frederick 0. Kiel and Mr. David W. Matthews, for relator.
   Per Curiam.

After a careful examination and review of the record in this cause, this court concurs with the findings and conclusions of the board that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4), DR 6-101(A)(3) and DR 7-101(A)(2) and (3).

It is the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J.P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.