Case ID: f2d_769/html/1410-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stanley Mills STANERT, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 84-5128.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Aug. 28, 1985.
    Roger W. Haines, Jr., Maria T. Arroryo-Tabin, Asst. U.S. Attys., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
    Craig E. Weinerman, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
    Before GOODWIN, POOLE, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

The opinion in this case, which was filed June 5, 1985, 762 F.2d 775, is amended by adding a footnote 1 at the end of the third full paragraph in Part III, at p. 780, beginning, “In his motion for an evidentiary hearing before the district judge____” Footnote 1 shall read:

The question whether a defendant has made a sufficient preliminary showing to entitle him to a Franks [v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978)] hearing is reviewable de novo. United States v. Ritter, 752 F.2d 435, 439 (9th Cir.1985).

As amended, the panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing. The mandate shall issue in accordance with Fed.R.App.P. 41(a).