Case ID: njl_101/html/0418-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOHN THORNE, APPELLANT, v. ANTHONY E. CASALE, RECORDER, ETC., RESPONDENT.
    Submitted February 9, 1925
    Decided March 16, 1925.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported sub nomine Tliome v. Kearnej", in 100 N. J. L. 228.
    For the appellant, John J. Mwphy.
    
    For the respondent, John H. Cooper.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenohard, Parker, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Campbell, Lloyd, Gardner, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Kalisch, Van Buskirk, JJ. 2.