Case ID: so2d_445/html/0643-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eloy GARCIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 83-1410.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Feb. 14, 1984.
    Rehearing Denied March 12, 1984.
    Carlton & Carlton, Lakeland, and Thomas Wills, Miami, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lawrence Price, Certified Legal Intern, for appellee.
    Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

It is unnecessary to address appellant’s main point on appeal which challenges the ruling that his confession was voluntarily and freely given. Even were we to hold the confession inadmissible, the remaining competent evidence was more than ample to “satisfy the conscience of the court” that the conditions of probation had been substantively violated. See Randolph v. State, 292 So.2d 374 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 300 So.2d 901 (Fla.1974); McNeely v. State, 186 So.2d 520 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966).

Affirmed.