Case ID: sw3d_169/html/0580-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nathaniel J. STEPHENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 64359.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Aug. 23, 2005.
    Ruth Sanders, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
    Deborah Daniels, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before SMART, P.J., HOLLIGER and HARDWICK, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel Stephens appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Upon review of the parties’ briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value. Rule 84.16(b).