Case ID: sw2d_895/html/0204-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gregory LOMAX, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. 66376.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Feb. 14, 1995.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 20, 1995.
    David C. Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before GRIMM, C.J., and REINHARD and CARL L. GAERTNER, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

On June 23, 1993, movant’s jury trial on a charge of possession of heroin began. Apparently before the jury was finally selected, movant indicated his desire to plead guilty. Pursuant to Rule 24.02, the trial court informed movant of his rights and determined that the plea was voluntary.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).