Case ID: ny_199/html/0574-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

American Ferrofix Brazing Company, Respondent, v. Nathaniel R. Potter et al., Appellants.
    
      American Ferrofix Brazing Co. v. Potter, 133 App. Div. 938, affirmed.
    (Argued October 4, 1910;
    decided October 25, 1910.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the. Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered June 7, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover upon a promissory note.
    
      8. D. Bentley for appellants.
    
      William W. Armstrong for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Cli. J., Yann, Werner, Willabd Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.