Case ID: misc_180/html/0213-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Samuel Burstein, Appellant, v. Arthur Castellano, Defendant, and Pauline Castellano, Defendant-Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    March 24, 1943.
    
      
      Samuel Burstein, appellant in person.
    No appearance for defendant-respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Under section 684 of the Civil Practice Act, plaintiff was entitled to have a garnishee execution. The City Court order fining the defendant for contempt and directing installment payments of five dollars a month is not a bar to obtaining a garnishee execution under section 684 of the Civil Practice Act.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied.

Shientag, Bosenman and McLaughlin, JJ., concur.