Case ID: nj-misc_7/html/0898-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOHN FISHER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Decided October 16, 1929.
    Before Gummere, Chief Justice, and Justices Parker and Bodine.
    Eor the defendant-appellant, Bourgeois & Coulomb.
    
    Eor the plaintiff-respondent, Worth •& Worth.
    
   Per Curiam.

Our examination of the testimony in this cause leads us to the conclusion that the accident was contributed to by the negligence of the plaintiff’s servant.

The rule should be made absolute.