Case ID: f-appx_101/html/0250-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roland Dean Black Weasel DEROCHE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-30372.
    D.C. No. CR-98-00035-CCL.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 14, 2004.
    
    Decided June 18, 2004.
    Lori Harper Suek, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, for PlaintiffAppellee.
    Michael Donahoe, Federal Defenders of Montana, Helena, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before HALL, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Roland Dean Black Weasel DeRoche appeals his 51-month sentence imposed after the revocation of his term of supervised release. DeRoche was convicted of aggravated sexual assault, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153(a), 2241(a)(1) and (2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for DeRoche has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. DeRoche has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.