Case ID: so2d_602/html/0700-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. ANSTEAD, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alvin Ray OXENDINE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 91-1352.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Aug. 12, 1992.
    Nelson E. Bailey, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Sarah B. Mayer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and GUNTHER, J., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with opinion.

ANSTEAD, Judge,

concurring specially.

I agree with the majority that the appellant’s conviction should be affirmed. On one issue, that of allowing a police officer to give opinion testimony as to the appellant being the “main guy” in the drug conspiracy alleged, I believe error has been demonstrated. However, upon review of all the evidence, I believe such error was harmless. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).