Case ID: minn_296/html/0529-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

KENNETH KIVIMAKI v. ANTHONY CVEK.
    208 N. W. 2d 96.
    June 8, 1973
    No. 43736.
    
      M. H. Greenberg and Ben P. Constantine, for appellant.
    
      William R. Ojala, for respondent.
    
      Heard before Knutson, C. J., and Rogosheske, Peterson, and Kelly, JJ.
   Per Curiam.

The issue in this case is simply whether the evidence was sufficient to support the finding of the trial court that a legally binding purchase agreement existed between the parties. We hold that it was.

Affirmed.