Case ID: ark_341/html/0523-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel W. JOHNSON v. STATE of Arkansas
    CR 00-476
    17 S.W.3d 499
    Supreme Court of Arkansas
    Opinion delivered June 1, 2000
    
      The James Law Firm, by: Steven R. McNeely and William O. “Bill” James, Jr., for appellant.
    
      Mark Pryor, Att’y Gen., by: C. Joseph Cordi, Jr., Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

[1] Appellant Danny W Johnson has filed a petition AM. review pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 1-2 and 2-4, stating that he is entitled to a review because the Arkansas Court of Appeals erroneously affirmed appellant’s second-degree murder conviction for noncompliance with our abstracting requirements. We have determined that review is proper on the issue of whether appellant’s conviction was properly affirmed for noncompliance with Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2. Because determination of this issue involves the interpretation and application of Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2, we grant review on this question only.