Case ID: fla_98/html/0460-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Elizabeth Hurshman, a widow, Appellant, v. Anna Montgomery, a feme sole, Appellee.
    
    Division B.
    Decision filed September 23, 1929.
    Petition for rehearing denied October 7, 1929.
    
      E. W. Capshaw, for Appellant;
    
      C. L. Brown, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted t,o the Court upon the transcript of the record of the orders herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there are no errors in the said orders; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that said orders of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, .P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur. ■