Case ID: ga-app_13/html/0660-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Hill, O. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

5121.
    Cameron v. The State.
    Decided October 28, 1913.
    ■ Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of LaGrange— Judge Harwell. June 34, 1913.
    
      Mooty & Andrews, for plaintiff in' error.
    . Henry Beeves, solicitor, contra.
   Hill, O. J.

1. The written request .to charge was pertinent and material to the contention of the accused. The entire charge is not in the record, but the trial judge in his order overruling the motion for a new trial states that he submitted to the jury the contentions of the accused embraced in the written request, and incorporated in his order the substance of his instructions on the contentions covered by the request, and an examination of these instructions shows that they clearly covered the -substance of the written request.

2. No other error of law except' as above stated being complained of, and, the verdict being supported by evidence, the judgment must be Affirmed.