Case ID: nj-eq_112/html/0222-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eva W. Ballentine, complainant-appellant, v. Allen D. B. Ballentine, defendant-respondent.
    [Decided January 23d, 1933.]
    
      
      Mr. E. Garfield Gifford, for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. Kalisch & Kalisch (Mr. Samuel Kalisch, Jr., of counsel), for the respondent.
   Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Advisory Master Reed.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Teenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Beogan, Heher, Kays, Heteield, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.