Case ID: sw3d_448/html/0361-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel BAKER, Petitioner/Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent/Appellant.
    No. ED 101232
    Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO
    Filed: November 18, 2014
    Adam S. Rowley, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65109, for appellant.
    Travis L. Noble, Jr., Sindel, Sindel & Noble, 8000 Maryland Avenue, Suite 350, Clayton, Missouri 63105, for respondent.
    Before Sherri B.-Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

The Director of Revenue (the Director) appeals the trial court’s judgment reinstating the driver’s license of Daniel Baker (Petitioner). The Director claims that the trial court erred as a matter of law by reinstating Petitioner’s driving privileges because Petitioner did not properly invoke his request for counsel, in that the officer did not hear Petitioner’s request. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).