Case ID: f2d_816/html/0479-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Norman Ray FREELOVE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 86-3091.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted March 2, 1987.
    Decided May 4, 1987.
    Lance A. Caldwell, Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellee.
    Priscilla L. Seaborg, Portland, Or., for defendant-appellant.
    
      Before SNEED and HALL, Circuit Judges, and LEGGE , District Judge.
    
      
       Honorable Charles A. Legge, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
    
   ORDER

In the case before us the prosecution’s chief witness recanted shortly after trial. Prior to oral argument, counsel informed us that defendant had escaped from custody. To this date he remains a fugitive.

Defendant’s escape does not deprive this court of power to hear this appeal, but it does disentitle the defendant from demanding appeal as of right. Molinaro v. New Jersey, 396 U.S. 365, 366, 90 S.Ct. 498, 499, 24 L.Ed.2d 586 (1970) (per curiam). One may not invoke the power of judicial review only thereafter to obey or disobey the lower court’s mandate as he sees fit.

We therefore dismiss defendant’s appeal with prejudice subject to the following qualification: if defendant surrenders to state authorities within 42 days of the date hereof, his appeal shall be reinstated and decided on the merits as submitted. Cf. United States v. Macias, 519 F.2d 697, 698 (9th Cir.1975).