Case ID: ohio-st_169/html/0289-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Regal Realty Co., Appellant, v. Hamilton County Board of Revision, Appellee. Harris, Appellant, v. Hamilton County Board of Revision, Appellee.
    (Nos. 35949 and 35950
    Decided June 3, 1959.)
    
      
      Messrs. Cors, Hair, Hartsock & Schneider and Mr. Irving Harris, for appellants.
    
      Mr. C. Watson Hover, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Raymond C. Wether ell, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

It does not appear from an examination of the records that the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals are against the manifest weight of the evidence or are otherwise unlawful or unreasonable. The decisions are, therefore, affirmed.

Decisions affirmed.

Weygandt, 0. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.

Taet, J., concurs only in judgment with respect to case No. 85950.