Case ID: sw2d_805/html/0708-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Frank McSWEENEY, Appellant.
    No. WD 43020.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    March 19, 1991.
    Michael C. McIntosh, Schaffer, McIntosh & Effertz, Independence, for appellant.
    Hugh C. Harvey, Pros. Atty., Donald G. Stouffer, Asst. Pros. Atty., Marshall, for respondent.
    Before NUGENT, C.J., P.J., and ULRICH and BRECKENRIDGE, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Frank McSweeney appeals from his conviction of exceeding the speed limit in violation of § 304.010 RSMo 1986, alleging the state laid an insufficient foundation for the admission of the radar reading.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).