Case ID: ny_220/html/0599-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Neponset National Bank, Respondent, v. Harris T. Dunbar et al., as Executors of Charles F. Dunbar, Deceased, Appellants.
    
      Weponset Wat. Bank v. Dunbar, 166 App. Div. 970, affirmed.
    (Argued January 16, 1917;
    decided January 30, 1917.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered April 3, 1915, upon an order reversing a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict directed by the court and directing judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action to recover upon two promissory notes. - The defense was that the notes were delivered for the accommodation of the plaintiff and upon the express understanding and condition that at no time should any liability be predicated upon said notes, and that said notes were delivered and accepted upon the aforesaid express understanding and condition and solely for the accommodation of the plaintiff.
    
      Frederick C. Slee for appellants.
    
      John W. Ryan for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Hogan, Cardozo and Pound, JJ. Not voting: Cuddebaok, J.