Case ID: ad2d_29/html/0875-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ernesto Morales, as Administrator of the Estate of Carlos Morales, Deceased, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant, et al., Defendant.
   Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 14, 1966, which granted plaintiff’s motion to serve a complaint nunc pro tune, reversed, on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. The delay in serving the complaint of over 58 months is inordinately long. Plaintiff’s excuse that his attorney misplaced the file is legally insufficient (Gallagher v. City of New York, 19 A D 2d 623; Steuerman v. Feinman, 19 A D 2d 847; Francisco V. Walgreen Eastern Co., 25 A D 2d 681). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.