Case ID: ohio-st_131/html/0331-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The May Co. v. Rowe. The Standard Drug Co. v. Rowe. The Bing Co. v. Rowe.
    (Nos. 25585, 25586 and 25587
    Decided June 3, 1936.)
    
      Messrs. Mooney, Hahn, Loeser S Keough, for plaintiff in error in causes Nos. 25585 and 25586.
    
      
      Messrs. Walpaw & Walpaw, for plaintiff in error in cause No. 25587.
    
      Mr. Jack B. Dworken and Mr. Harry L. Lodish, for defendant in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petitions in error be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said causes.

Petitions in error dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.