Case ID: so2d_679/html/0020-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Todd Jay JONAS, Appellant, v. Howard E. LANDAU, et al., Appellees.
    No. 96-308.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 31, 1996.
    Wampler, Buchanan & Breen and Larry L. Cook and Donna L. Deconna, Miami, for appellant.
    Michael A Levin and Howard Landau, Miami, for appellees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and SHEVIN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Jonas, an architect, appeals from an order dismissing Count I of his three count complaint. Each of the three counts seeks the same damages for the same services against the same defendants based on separate legal theories, respectively the imposition of a construction lien (Count I), breach of contract (Count II), and unjust enrichment (Count III). Because Counts II and III remain pending below, it is obvious that the dismissal of Count I is not appealable at this time. Mendez v. West Flagler Family Assoc., 303 So.2d 1 (Fla.1974); Roper v. Wilcox, 596 So.2d 532 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Lavey v. Tattoli, 491 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); One Thousand Oaks, Inc. v. Dade Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 417 So.2d 1135 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Appeal dismissed.