Case ID: f2d_356/html/0942-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JONES & GUERRERO COMPANY, Inc., a corporation, Appellant, v. DAIWA NAVIGATION CO., Ltd., Appellee.
    No. 20049.
    United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
    Feb. 17, 1966.
    Arriola, Bohn & Gayle, John A. Bohn, John J. Carniato, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
    Barrett, Ferenz & Trapp, Walter S. Ferenz, W. Scott Barrett, Oakland, Cal., for appellee.
    Before HAMLEY, KOELSCH, and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Upon an examination of the record we conclude that the trial court’s finding that appellant was indebted to appellee was a permissible inference from Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1, the Wiseman deposition, and defense counsel’s statement at pretrial conference. The judgment is therefore affirmed.