Case ID: nys_104/html/1128-15.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HACKETT, Respondent, v. VIEW et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    September, 1906.)
    Action by Blary E. Hackett against George H. View and another.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order denying motion for new trial reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event. Order permitting service of amended reply affirmed. Held, that there was no sufficient evidence of mutual mistake. See opinion of NASH, J., on former appeal. 109 App. Div. 351, 95 N. Y. Supp. 675. Also, that there was no sufficient evidence of waiver or abandonment.