Case ID: ga-app_27/html/0723-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Hill, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

12631, 12645.
    Auld v. City of Elberton; and vice versa.
    
    Decided November 29, 1921.
    Action for damages; from Elbert superior court — Judge W. L. Hodges. May 23, 1921.
    
      Grogan & Payne, for plaintiff.
    
      L. B. Nall, Putt & Brown, for defendant.
   Hill, J.

1. The judgment of the trial court granting a new trial was based specially upon two grounds of the motion therefor. It was the first grant of a new trial. It not appearing that no other verdict than the one rendered could possibly have been rendered under the law and the facts of the case, this court will not reverse the judgment. Parks v. Stevens, 21 Ga. App. 180 (94 S. E. 60).

2. There was no harmful error in any of the portions of the charge of the court excepted to in the cross-bill of exceptions, nor was there any merit in the other assignments of error therein.

Judgment on both bills of exceptions affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.