Case ID: ohio-st-3d_84/html/0254-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Lundberg Stratton, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[The State ex rel.] ON Environmental Services, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as State ex rel. ON Environmental Serv. v. Indus. Comm. (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 254.]
    (No. 97-1613
    Submitted October 27, 1998
    Decided December 30, 1998.)
    
      Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, L.P.A, George H. Rosin and Grant M. Yoakum, for appellant.
    
      Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and William J. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.
    
      Brian & Brian and Richard F. Brian, for appellee Michelle K. Berns.
   The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Móyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., concur.

Resnick, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals on the basis that the landfill operation does not qualify as “construction.” Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.