Case ID: so2d_644/html/0354-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Wayne DILBERT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 94-03424.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Nov. 9, 1994.
   PER CURIAM.

The denial of appellant’s motion for a “proposed order to clarify sentence” is affirmed without prejudice to the appellant seeking relief with respect to gain time by filing either a petition for writ of habeas corpus or mandamus. See Searcy v. Singletary, 590 So.2d 1034 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Hall v. Wainwright, 498 So.2d 670 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.