Case ID: sw3d_404/html/0913-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CUIVRE RIVER ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Gary MILLER and Karen Miller, Defendants/Appellants.
    No. ED 99117.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    May 28, 2013.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 24, 2013.
    Jayson B. Lenox, Jeffrey D. Gamber, St. Charles, MO, for Plaintiff/Respondent.
    Kathryn E. Denner, St. Louis, MO, for Defendants/Appellants.
    Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gary and Karen Miller (the Millers, collectively) appeal from the trial court’s judgment entered in favor of Cuivre River Electric Cooperative, Inc. (CREC) on CREC’s Petition to Quiet Title and on Counts I, II and III of the Millers’ counterclaims. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not err in entering judgment in favor of CREC because there is no genuine issue of material fact and CREC is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ITT Comm. Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).