Case ID: f2d_450/html/0336-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael John STINSON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 71-1831.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Oct. 21, 1971.
    
      Neil Horton (argued), of Johnston, Klein, Horton & Solomon, Oakland, Cal., for appellant.
    James Bruen, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), James L. Browning, U. S. Atty., F. Steele Langford, Chief, Crim. Div., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
    Before DUNIWAY and ELY, Circuit Judges, and McNICHOLS, District Judge
    
    
      
       Honorable Ray McNichols, United States District Judge, District of Idaho, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM:

The record shows that when the local board classified appellant 1-A, the decision was made by less than a quorum of the Board. The classification was therefore invalid and cannot support the order of induction. When the mandate goes down, the indictment will be dismissed.

Reversed.