Case ID: nys_65/html/1142-08.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

OBERSTEIN et al., Respondents, v. DIACK, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    June 28, 1900.)
    Action by Abraham Oberstein and another against Susan M. Diack. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Reversed. Charles M. Morgan & Son, for appellant. Leon Sanders, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

From the judgment it seems that the justice found $200 a fair charge for the services claimed to have been rendered for defendant. The evidence does not warrant the finding, as there is no evidence of the value of the wife’s interest in the policy. From the evidence it is not clear that the services were rendered for the defendant. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.