Case ID: so2d_636/html/0508-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nadine NEVADOMSKI, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 82064.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    May 5, 1994.
    Alan H. Schreiber, Public Defender, and Stacey J. Pastel, Asst. Public Defender, Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Joan Fowler, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Chief, Crim. Law, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We review the decision of the district court of appeal in State v. Nevadomski, 619 So.2d 310 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), in which the district court certified several questions as being of great public importance. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

In Carino v. State, 635 So.2d 9 (Fla.1994), the certified questions were answered to the extent the Court found appropriate. On the authority of Carino, the decision under review is approved.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, SHAW, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.