Case ID: sw_170/html/0144-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HARPER, j.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BOREN v. STATE.
    (No. 3265.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Oct. 21, 1914.)
    Criminal Law (§ 1097) — A:ppea]>-Recobd— Matters Presented foe Review.
    On appeal from a conviction for unlawfully carrying a pistol, the refusal of a special charge, based on accused’s contention that he was on his own premises, could not be reviewed, in the absence of a statement of facts, as it could not be determined whether such issue was raised by the testimony.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2862, 2864, 2926, 2934, 2938, 2939, 2941, 2942, 2947; Dec. Dig. | 1097.]
    Appeal from 'Dallas County Court, at Law; W42P. Whitehurst, Judge.
    S. E. Boren was convicted of unlawfully carrying a pistol, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    
      
      For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key-No. Series & Rep’r Indexes
    
   HARPER, j.

Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of the offense of unlawfully carrying a pistol, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $100.

By the special charge requested we should judge that the contention made by appellant was that he was on his own premises; but as no statement of facts accompanies the record, we cannot determine whether or not that issue was raised by the testimony. In the absence of a statement of facts, no issue is raised in the motion for a new trial which we can review.

Affirmed.