Case ID: wis-2d_27/html/0142-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Graebner and another, Respondents, v. Industrial Commission, Appellant.
    
      March 1
    
    March 30, 1965.
    
    For the appellant the cause was argued by Roy G. Mita, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.
    For the respondents there was a brief and oral argument by Russell /. Mittelstadt, attorney, and Frank A. Ross, Sr., of counsel, both of Madison.
   Per Curiam.

Mr. Justice Wilkie having taken no part in the decision upon this appeal, and the other members of the court being equally divided on the question whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, Mr. Chief Justice Currie, Mr. Justice Fairchild, and Mr. Justice Gordon being of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed, and Mr. Justice Hallows, Mr. Justice Beilfuss, and Mr. Justice Heffernan being of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.