Case ID: f-appx_546/html/0600-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lucindo A. MAZARIEGOS-HERRERA; Daisy Mabel Mazariegos; Jason J.A. Mazariegos-Garcia; Benjamin Leiva Masariegos, Petitioners v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of United States, Respondent.
    No. 13-1475.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 20, 2013.
    Filed: Dec. 5, 2013.
    Chinedu Igbokwe, Emeka Igbokwe, Banwo & Igbokwe Law Firm, Omaha, NE, for Petitioners.
    Jeffrey Bernstein, Senior Litigation Counsel, Karen Yolanda Drummond, Richard M. Evans, Assistant Director, Joseph Anthony O’Connell, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Lucindo Mazariegos-Herrera, his wife Daisy Mazariegos, his son Jason Mazarie-gos-Garcia, and his uncle Benjamin Leiva Masariegos, citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming an immigration judge’s denial of their renewed and consolidated applications for asylum and withholding of removal. We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s determination that the asylum application of Mazariegos-Herrera and his derivative beneficiaries was barred as untimely filed. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3); Ngure v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 975, 988-89 (8th Cir.2004). After careful review, we conclude that the BIA’s denial of asylum as to Leiva Masar-iegos — and its denial of withholding of removal as to all petitioners — was supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. See Cubillos v. Holder, 565 F.3d 1054, 1056 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review for denial of asylum); Menjivar v. Gonzales, 416 F.3d 918, 920-22 (8th Cir.2005) (standard of review for denial of withholding of removal; discussing “unwilling or unable to control” standard for non-governmental persecution). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.