Case ID: f-appx_79/html/0610-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re William S. GADD, Petitioner.
    No. 03-4675.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 17, 2003.
    Decided Nov. 3, 2003.
    William Sanford Gadd, Petitioner pro se.
    Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

William Sanford Gadd petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to dismiss. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.