Case ID: njl_110/html/0608-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FRANK A. WAGNER, ADMINISTRATOR, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. PRINCETON WORSTED MILLS, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT.
    Submitted February 17, 1933
    Decided May 15, 1933.
    For the respondent, Charles Quinn.
    
    For the appellant, Wall, Haight, Carey <& Hartpence.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.