Case ID: nys_24/html/1140-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(70 Hun, 598.)
    FOOTE, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN EL. RY. CO. et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.
    June 30, 1893.)
    Appeal from special term, New York county.
    Action by Blizur V. Foote against the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company and another to enjoin the operation of defendants’ road in front of plaintiff’s premises, and for past damages. From a judgment for plaintiff, granting an injunction and directing mesne damages to be assessed by referees, defendants appeal:
    Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and FOLLETT and PARKER, JJ.
    Davies & Rapallo, (J. T. Davies and Alex. S. Lyman, of counsel,) for appellants.
    Joseph B. Reilly and L. C. Dessar, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The question involved having been previously decided by the general term, (12 N. Y. Supp. 516,) the judgment should be affirmed,with costs.