Case ID: sw2d_823/html/0068-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

KORTE FOUNDATIONS, INC., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Ron SMITH, a/k/a R & P Enterprises, et al., Defendants/Appellants.
    No. 58201.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Nov. 19, 1991.
    Lee Allison Bonine, Mertz, Stern & Fra-polli, St. Louis, for defendants/appellants.
    Gerald Julian Bamberger, St. Charles, for plaintiff/respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendants appeal after the trial court entered judgment establishing a mechanic’s lien on their property. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).