Case ID: ad_165/html/0948-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Paul Bovanizer, Respondent, v. Rufus A. Babcock, Appellant.
    Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Held, that the complaint not being subdivided into separately numbered paragraphs, the denials of the answer are to be deemed to apply to all the material allegations of the complaint, and even if considered as denials of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief, are sufficient to raise an issue as to the allegations of transfer to and ownership by plaintiff. (See Rochkind v. Perlman, 123 App. Div. 808; Curran v. Arp, 141 id. 659.)
   All concurred.