Case ID: tex-crim_45/html/0596-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BROOKS, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

A. A. Allison v. The State.
    No. 2781.
    Decided February 17, 1904.
    Indictment—Bribery at Election.
    In an indictment charging the accused with corruptly offering to bribe a qualified voter at a primary election for the purpose of influencing his vote for a candidate for the office' of Congress, it should be alleged that the election was held to elect a nominee for representative to the Congress of the United States, as in law there is no such office as "Congress.”
    Appeal from the County Court of Limestone. Tried below before Hon. A. J. Harper.
    Appeal from a conviction for offering a bribe at a primary election; penalty, a fine of $20.
    No statement is necessary.
    No brief for appellant on file.
    
      Howard Martin, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.
   BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was fined $20 upon conviction under indictment charging substantially as follows: That on or about the 14th day of June, 1902, A. A. Allison “did then and there unlawfully and corruptly offer to bribe and did bribe John Shipp, who was then and there a qualified voter at a primary election, and did then and there unlawfully, wilfully and corruptly offer to give and did give to said John Shipp the sum of three dollars, in money (lawful and current money of the "[Tinted States of America) for the purpose of influencing the said John Shipp at such election to vote and cast his vote at such election for E. E. Prince, who was then and there a candidate for the office of Congress. The said primary election being authorized by law, and being a primary election held by authority of the Democratic party on the 14th day of June, 1903, in all election precincts in Limestone County, for the purpose of nominating a candidate for Congress,” etc. Appellant made a motion to quash the indictment on the ground that there is no such office as "Congress” known to the law. In ordinary parlance, where a candidate is elected as the representative of the people of a district of a State to Congress, he is known and designated as congressman, or a ' candidate for Congress while running. But in law there is no such office as "Congress.” Nor can an election be held to elect a candidate for the office of Congress. Article 1, section 3, of the Constitution of the United States designates the office as "representative,” and hence the election was held to elect a nominee for "representative to the Congress of the United States.” We can not indulge presumptions to aid an indictment. The indictment must be drawn with legal accuracy and express the exact legal status of the position that the person seeks. It follows, therefore, that the indictment is defective in the particular pointed out. The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

jReversed and dismissed.