Case ID: f-appx_87/html/0664-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kim Thu Thi NGUYEN, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, of Social Security Administration, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 02-57095.
    D.C. No. CV-01-00914-MLG.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 3, 2004.
    
    Decided Feb. 10, 2004.
    Brian C. Shapiro, Rohlfing Law Firm, Steven G. Rosales, Law Offices Of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Santa Fe Springs, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
    Leo R. Montenegro, Office of the General Counsel, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before KOZINSKI, O’SCANNLAIN and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Because the ALJ gave specific and legitimate reasons based on substantial evidence in the record, he did not err in rejecting the testimony of the treating physician. Andrews v. Shalala, 53 F.3d 1035, 1041 (9th Cir.1995). He also did not err in rejecting claimant’s testimony regarding her subjective symptoms, because he gave clear and convincing reasons for doing so. Lester v. Chater, 81 F.3d 821, 834 (9th Cir.1995).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.