Case ID: ad3d_83/html/0537-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Chimilio, Appellant.
    [921 NYS2d 234]
   Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John N. Byrne, J.), rendered May 9, 2006, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea, without granting a hearing (see People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520 [1978]). “When a defendant moves to withdraw a guilty plea, the nature and extent of the fact-finding inquiry rest[s] largely in the discretion of the Judge to whom the motion is made and a hearing will be granted only in rare instances” (People v Brown, 14 NY3d 113, 116 [2010] [internal quotation marks omitted]).

The transcript of the plea proceeding demonstrates that the plea was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently made. In his original and supplementary plea withdrawal motions, defendant alleged he was innocent and had been coerced by prior counsel, with particular reference to counsel’s statement that defendant had “no choice” but to plead guilty. Despite ample opportunity to elaborate on his claims, and the assistance of new counsel, defendant did not establish any basis for vacating the plea or conducting a hearing. He did not give the court any reason to believe the allegedly coercive conduct amounted to anything more than frank advice, based on the strength of the People’s case and defendant’s predicted sentencing exposure, to accept the favorable plea offer.

We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining challenges to his plea. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.