Case ID: f-appx_84/html/0720-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eugene H. MATHISON; Judy R. Mathison, Appellants, v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA; Hoyt Brill; Leann Stone; Charles Zacharias; Five John/Jane Does; United States of America, Appellees.
    No. 03-2233.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 26, 2003.
    Decided Jan. 5, 2004.
    Eugene H. Mathison, pro se, Rochester, MN, Judy R. Mathison, pro se, Sioux Falls, SD, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    Caryn Scherb Glover, Best & Flanagan, Perry F. Sekus, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Eugene H. Mathison and his wife Judy appeal the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment in their lawsuit brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), the Federal Tort Claims Act, and state tort law. Their claims were based on allegations concerning Eugene Mathison’s access to a law library while he was incarcerated at Prairie Correctional Facility in Appleton, Wisconsin—a Correctional Corporation of America (CCA) facility. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Beck v. Skon, 253 F.3d 330, 332-33 (8th Cir.2001) (standard of review), we conclude that the claims against CCA and its employees, and against the United States, were properly dismissed; that the court’s summary judgment ruling was not premature as to the United States; and that the court did not abuse its discretion in declining to exercise jurisdiction over Judy Mathison’s supplemental loss-of-consortium claim, see Labickas v. Ark. State Univ., 78 F.3d 333, 334-35 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 968, 117 S.Ct. 395, 136 L.Ed.2d 310 (1996). We also deny appellants’ pending motion.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Arthur J. Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
     
      
      . Appellants are not challenging the dismissal of Charles Zacharias, a federal marshal.