Case ID: f-appx_612/html/0193-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Ryan Randall RAMEY, Petitioner.
    No. 15-1221.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 7, 2015.
    Decided: Aug. 14, 2015.
    Ryan Randall Ramey, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ryan Randall Ramey petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district' court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for reconsideration in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) proceeding. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied the motion on July 8, 2015. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Ramey’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.