Case ID: ohio-law-abs_4/html/0739-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 932
    PENNA RD. CO. v. PUB. UTIL. COM.
    No. 20028.
    Supreme Court
    On motion to certify.
    Dock. July 30, 1926;
    4 Abs. 525.
    973. PUBLIC UTILITIES — Can commission grant an application for change in schedule, tariff, etc. without hearing because no objection was filed thereto?
    Attorneys — Henderson & Burr, and S. B. Randall for Company; C. C. Crabbe, Atty. Gen. and J. W. Bricker for Commission; all of Columbus.
   The question herein involved is a petition in error filed to order of Public Utilities Commission allowing amendment of time schedule and tariffs subject to a motion to grant without hearing, the commission ruling that hearing was not necessary since no objection was, filed to granting of applicatino for a certificate.