Case ID: ohio-st-2d_46/html/0058-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State, ex rel. Ruffin, Appellant, v. Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, Appellee.
    [Cite as State, ex rel. Ruffin, v. Court of Common Pleas. (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 58.]
    (No. 75-989
    —Decided April 28,1976.)
    
      Mr. John G. Pegg, for appellant.
    
      Mr. Conrad J. Morgenstern, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Appellant’s remedy is by way of appeal, and “prohibition is not a substitute for appeal.” State, ex rel. Gilla, v. Fellerhoff (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 86, 88.

The judgment'of the Court of Appeals, dismissing the complaint in prohibition, is affirmed: '■ '

■Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Ceeebrezze, "W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.