Case ID: so2d_622/html/0620-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "GRIFFIN, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James BRYANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-2395.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Aug. 13, 1993.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Kenneth Witts, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
    
      Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Asst, Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
   GRIFFIN, Judge.

Appellant’s conviction for grand theft and his sentence as a habitual offender are affirmed; however, we remand to the lower court to delete all references in the probation order that pertain to consumption of alcohol or to testing or treatment for use of alcohol. A condition prohibiting the use of illegal drugs and providing for random testing for such drugs is proper, but there is no basis on this record to require appellant to undergo “drug offender probation” or drug treatment. Biller v. State, 618 So.2d 734 (Fla.1993); §§ 948.01(13), 948.03(1)0), Fla.Stat. (1991).

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.