Case ID: so2d_785/html/1246-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hoyt PATTERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D98-4215.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 30, 2001.
    Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David M. Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

On appeal, the state concedes that an evidentiary hearing is required to resolve the issues raised in Hoyt Patterson’s post-conviction motion. We agree. The order summarily denying Patterson’s motion is reversed, and the case is remanded to the trial court with direction to hold an eviden-tiary hearing to resolve his claim.

WARNER, C.J., STONE and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.