Case ID: a2d_809/html/0243-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Thomas W. DRUCE, III, Petitioner.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Oct. 21, 2002.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of October, 2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby granted, limited to the following issue:

Does a judge’s violation of Judicial Canon 3A(6) establish enough evidence to compel recusal or is more evidence required, i.e., evidence concerning an appearance of bias and prejudice?