Case ID: f-appx_103/html/0861-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sharon R. PFENNIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOUSEHOLD CREDIT SERVICES, INC. and MBNA America Bank, N.A. Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 00-4213.
    United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
    July 8, 2004.
    John T. Murray, Sylvia M. Antalis, Murray & Murray, Sandusky, OH, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    William G. Porter, II, John J. Todor, Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, David W. Alexander, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Columbus, OH, Richard C. Pepperman, II, Sharon L. Nelles, Sullivan & Cromwell, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before CLAY and GILMAN, Circuit Judges; and EDGAR, District Judge.
    
    
      
      The Honorable R. Allan Edgar, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, sitting by designation
    
   ORDER

The Supreme Court having reversed the judgment entered by this Court on July 2, 2002 (see opinion reported at 295 F.3d 522), and the Supreme Court having held that the applicable section of Regulation Z is not an unreasonable interpretation of § 1605 (see Household Credit Services, Inc., et al. v. Pfennig, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 1741, 158 L.Ed.2d 450 (2004)). the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio with instructions to dismiss the complaint on grounds not inconsistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.