Case ID: njl_104/html/0436-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JAMES HENDERSHOT, RESPONDENT, v. NEW YORK, SUSQUEHANNA AND WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Argued October 25, 1927
    Decided February 7, 1928.
    For the respondent, William C. Gebhardt & Son.
    
    For the appellant, Hobart & Minard.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.