Case ID: ga_81/html/0342-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Blandford, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Creel et al. vs. Bush.
    The verdict was against the weight of the evidence, and there was no error in granting a new trial.
    May 16, 1888.
    New trial. Before Judge Adamson. City court of Carrollton. August term, 1887.
    Report unnecessary.
    Walker & Reese, for'plaintiffs in error.
    Merrell & Cole, contra.
    
   Blandford, Justice.

Bush sued Creel and Lott in the city court of Carroll-ton for the price of a gin. A verdict was had for the defendants. The court granted a new trial. The record shows a great deal of conflicting evidence in the case. It furthermore appears that the verdict was against the preponderance and weight of the evidence; and we think the court did right to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.