Case ID: njl_104/html/0167-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

AARON DICHTER, RESPONDENT, v. HARRY ISAACSON ET AL., APPELLANTS.
    Submitted May 27, 1927
    Decided October 17, 1927.
    For the respondent, Joseph J. Mutnich, Jr.
    
    For the appellants, Winfield 8. Angleman.
    
   Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chiee Justice, Teenchaed, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yah Buskibk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.