Case ID: ny-st-rep_59/html/0629-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pratt, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James C. Brower, Resp’t, v. Leopold Kahn, Impleaded, etc., App’lt.
    
      (Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department,
    
    
      Filed February 12, 1894.)
    
    Attorney and client—Appearance.
    An appearance by an attorney for a party in an action will not be vacated, where the latter is not prejudiced thereby.
    Appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate a notice of appearance interposed on behalf of defendant.
    
      Hahn At Myers (Hmanuel J. Myers, and Arthur A. Alexander, of counsel), for app’lt; William T. Gilbert ( William H. Ford, of counsel), for resp’t.
   Pratt, J.

The appearance of a duly-admitted attorney of the court is prima facie good. Where it is shown that he was not authorized to‘appear, and it is shown that injustice will be done by allowing the appearance to stand, the court, upon the application of a party whose rights are imperiled, will take adequate measures for their protection. That is not this case. Kahn has no rights in the premises, and no interest in the litigation. If the facts which are shown in this application appeared upon the real property records, he would not have been made a party to the litigation. The appearance for him of the attorney does him no injury, and the motion to strike it from the record was properly denied.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.