Case ID: so2d_228/html/0382-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. DREW, Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dudley George HANEMANN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 38677.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Nov. 25, 1969.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 12, 1970.
    Robert P. Miller, Daytona Beach, for petitioner.
    Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and James Robert Yon, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Writ of certiorari having heretofore issued, argument having been heard, and the court having examined the record and briefs, it appears that the writ was improvidently issued. Accordingly, the writ of certiorari heretofore issued in this cause is discharged. See State v. Lowe, 130 So. 2d 288 (Fla.App.1961).

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

DREW, J., dissents with opinion.

DREW, Justice

(dissenting).

I dissent. I am in complete agreement with the views expressed and the judgment reached by Judge Rawls in his dissenting opinion in the district court, appearing at 221 So.2d 230.