Case ID: okla_35/html/0394-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WILLIAMS, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ST. CLAIR v. HUFNAGLE et al.
    
    No. 3597.
    Opinion Filed January 28, 1913.
    (131 Pac. 171.)
    APPEAL AND ERROR — Case-Made—Time for Filing — Review. A motion for a new trial, being overruled on February 11, 1911, the petition in error with ease-made attached was filed with the clerk of this court op February 13, 1912. Held, that this court has no jurisdiction to entertain same.
    (Syllabus by the Court.)
    
      Error from Comanche County Court; James H. Wolz'erton, Judge.
    
    Action between P. L. St. Clair and August Plufnagle and others. From a judgment of the court below, P. L. St. Clair brings error.
    Dismissed.
    
      Chas. C. Black, for plaintiff in error.
    
      R. J. Ray, for defefidants in error.
   WILLIAMS, J.

Counsel for defendants in error moves to dismiss this proceeding in error on the ground that “more than one year elapsed after final judgment in the trial court and be^ fore the petition in error was filed in the Supreme Court; that the motion for a new trial was overruled in the trial court on the 11th day of February, 1911, and the petition in error was filed in the Supreme Court on the Í3th day of February, 1912.”

The record bears out the contention of the defendants in error. The motion to dismiss is sustained. Richardson et vir v. Beidleman et al., 33 Okla. 463, 126 Pac. 816.

All the Justices concur.