Case ID: nj_195/html/0230-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

948 A.2d 1285
    RAYMOND VAN DUREN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LEIGH E. RZASA-ORMES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    
      Kevin McNulty, argued the cause for appellant (Gibbons and Schepisi & McLaughlin, attorneys; Mr. McNulty, Michael R. Griffinger, John A. Schepisi and Glenn M. Finkel, on the briefs).
    
      Steven R. Klein, argued the cause for respondent (Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, attorneys; Mr. Klein and Susan M. Usatine, on the briefs).
    
      David G. Evans, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Pacific Legal Foundation.
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Parrillo’s opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 394 N.J.Super. 254, 926 A.2d 372 (2007).

For Justice RABNER and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, WALLACE, RIVERA-SOTO and