Case ID: njl_115/html/0112-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PETER C. BUCKELEW, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Submitted February 15, 1935
    Decided May 17, 1935.
    For the plaintiff-respondent, David T. Wilentz.
    
    For the defendant-appellant, William F. McCloskey.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Mr. Justice Parker.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Heher, J. 1.