Case ID: misc_187/html/0971-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nicholas Apfelbaum et al., Doing Business under the Name of Sichel & Apfelbaum, Landlords, Appellants, v. Joseph Klutch, Doing Business under the Name of Slender Theme Fashions, Tenant, Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    November 7, 1946.
    
      Solomon E. Star and Henry I. Levine for appellants.
    J. Leonard Stoll for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Memorandum The recovery on the tenant’s counterclaim must be limited to $1,000 exclusive of interest and costs (2525-7th Ave. Corp., v. Knight, 260 App. Div. 733).

The final order and judgment should be modified by reducing the judgment on the counterclaim to $1,000, with interest and costs, and as modified affirmed, without costs.

McLaughlin, Edeb and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Order and judgment accordingly.