Case ID: so2d_601/html/1343-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Elizabeth KING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, et al., Appellees.
    No. 91-2042.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 28, 1992.
    Arthur G. Luongo, Miami, for appellant.
    Steel Hector & Davis and Adalberto Jordan and Edwin Torres, Robin H. Greene, Miami, for appellees.
    Before NESBITT, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Elizabeth King appeals a final order adjudicating her daughter, J.K., dependent. She asserts error in the admission of certain hearsay statements of two of J.K.’s older siblings pursuant to section 90.-803(23), Florida Statutes (1989). Assuming arguendo that there was error in the admission of the siblings’ statements, any error was harmless. The dependency petition asserted multiple grounds for the dependency adjudication. Leaving the siblings’ statements entirely aside, there was an abundance of substantial competent evidence to support the order under review.

Affirmed.