Case ID: ga_118/html/0912-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Candler, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Parantha v. Cable Company.
    Submitted October 30,—
    Decided November 14, 1903.
   Candler, J.

There being no complaint that the court committed any error of law, and the finding in favor of the plaintiff being fully warranted by the-evidence, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial will not be disturbed. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Complaint. Before Judge Toombs. City court of Washington. February 16, 1903.

Golley & Sims, for plaintiff in error.

B. G. Norman, contra.