Case ID: sw2d_818/html/0722-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lonnie SNELLING, Appellant, v. Lloyd STEPHENSON, Respondent.
    No. 58744.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Oct. 29, 1991.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 18, 1991.
    Application to Transfer Denied Dec. 17, 1991.
    Lonnie Snelling, pro se.
    Lloyd Stephenson, pro se.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an action in slander. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendant after a court tried case. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).