Case ID: fla_121/html/0175-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Maas Brothers, a Corp., v. H. Walter Fuller, et al.
    
    163 So. 470.
    Opinion Filed October 9, 1935.
    
      
      Hampton, Bull & Crom, for Plaintiff in Error;
    
      Cook & Harris & J. Uhle Bethell, for Defendants in Error;
   Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error states that there are two questions presented in this case. From a perusal of the record, we conceive that there is only one question presented and that is, whether or not there was any evidence which would support a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. This is true because the court directed a verdict in favor of the defendant.

A careful perusal of the bill of exceptions, which we have considered although its propriety in the record is seriously questioned, shows that there was evidence to support a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and, therefore, the judgment should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.