Case ID: ga_139/html/0145-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Beck, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hood et al. v. Southern Railway Company.
    December 12, 1912.
    Petition for injunction. ' Before Judge Jones. Jackson superior court. January 6, 1912.
    IF. W. Stark and Cobb & Erwin, for plaintiffs.
    
      John J. & Boy M. Strickland, for defendant.
   Beck, J.

1. While certain documentary evidence tending to show the width of the defendant company’s right of way remote from the place at which its agents were constructing a side-track, the act against which an injunction was sought, was irrelevant, it was not of sufficient materiality to require a reversal of the judgment of the court below.

2. There was no abuse of discretion in refusing the interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.