Case ID: ga-app_36/html/0645-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

17886.
    Anderson v. The State.
    Decided April 12, 1927.
    Possessing intoxicating liquor; from city court of Reidsville— Judge Cowart. November 4, 1926.
    
      H. H. Elders, for plaintiff in error.
    
      M. W. Eason, solicitor, contra.
    Criminal Law, 16 C. J. p. 1206, n. 95; p. 1208, n. 97.
   Broyles, C. J.

The overruling of an extraordinary motion for a new trial based solely upon alleged newly discovered evidence is complained of in this case. After a careful consideration of that evidence as disclosed by the record, we are of the opinion that it is not of such a character as would probably produce a different verdict upon another trial. Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.