Case ID: ohio-st_115/html/0509-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "By the Court.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State, ex rel. Janson, v. Eschliman.
    
      Civil service — Municipal—Removal of commissioner by mayor —Section U8B-19, General Code — Provisions for hearing, constitutional — Quo warranto to remove successor and for reinstatement, dismissed — Relator refused to appear at hearing after notice by mayor.
    
    (No. 20089
    Decided December 21, 1926.)
    In Quo "Warranto.
    
      Mr. Price Janson, for relator.
    
      Messrs. Lynch, Day, Fimple, Pontius <& Lynch, for defendant.
   By the Court.

This canse coining on to be heard upon the demurrer to the answer of the respondent herein, the court upon consideration thereof overrules said demurrer, for the reasons:

First, that the court is of the opinion that Section 486-19, General Code, is not in contravention of the provisions of the Constitution of the state of Ohio.

Second, that the petition affirmatively shows that relator “refused to appear in response to the notice of the mayor at said hearing conducted on said charges on the 23d day of August, 1926,” thereby not availing himself of opportunity afforded by law for the protection of his rights, if any, in the premises.

The demurrer filed to the answer herein is therefore overruled, the judgment of ouster prayed for by the relator is denied, and the petition herein is dismissed at the cost of the relator.

Petition dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur.

Robinson, J., not participating.