Case ID: cal_4/html/0244-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. .Ch. J. Murray", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JUAN GARCIA, Respondent, v. M. de SATRUSTEGUI, Appellant.
    
       Pleading — Objections to be taken by Demurrer. — An omission to allege delivery in a suit on a bond, can be taken advantage of only on demurrer.
    Appeal from the Fifth Judicial District.
    
      Barbour for Appellant.
    
      Halleck, Peachy, Billings & Park, for Respondent.
    
      
       Cited in Wilkins v. Stidger, 22 Cal. 235. See Mitchie v. Davis, 5 Cal. 453; Sutter y. Coa:, 6 Cal. 415.
    
   Mr. .Ch. J. Murray

Mr. J. Heydeneeldt concurred.

By the previous decisions of this Court we are compelled to decide that the statement in this case has not been made in conformity to the statute, and is no part of the record. The case must therefore rest upon the judgment roll.

The only error relied on, at least of consequence, is, that the declaration does not allege a delivery of the bond sued on. This was a defect in pleading, which might have been taken advantage of on demurrer, but not having been so taken advantage of, is cured by the verdict. (See 1 Chitty’s Pleadings, § 912.)

Judgment affirmed, with costs.