Case ID: so2d_561/html/0012-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kenneth GIBSON, and Marie Gibson, his wife, Appellants, v. SUNSHINE STATE POOLS AND SPAS, INC., Appellee.
    No. 89-949.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 8, 1990.
    Holden & Holden, and Thomas Holden, for appellants.
    Mark D. Press, Miami, for appellee.
    Before FERGUSON, JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The parties agreed that an evidentiary hearing was needed in order for the court to determine whether there had been compliance with the terms of a stipulated settlement. According to the appellant, the trial court, without first hearing testimony to resolve disputed issues of fact, entered a final judgment for the appellee. Consequently, there is no record support for the judgment on review. It is a fundamental rule that findings of a trial court which are not supported by the record will be overturned on appeal. Marrone v. Miami Nat’l Bank, 507 So.2d 652 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings. 
      
      . Appellee has not filed an answer brief.