Case ID: nys_72/html/1103-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HASCALL, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FOLSOM, Appellant, v. WINTERS, Respondent.
    (City Court of New York,
    General Term.
    May, 1901.)
    Action by John G. Folsom against Elizabeth Winters.
    John M. Ward, for appellant.
   HASCALL, J.

We think that no error was committed by the court below that calls for a reversal of the judgment appealed from. The papers excluded did not tend to prove agency, and none was established. Most of plaintiff’s objections and exceptions are entirely without grounds assigned therefor, and cannot be considered by us upon appeal, while the others cannot avail as against the inherent weakness of appellant’s ease. Judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

CONLAN and O’DWYBR, JJ., concur.