Case ID: misc_133/html/0423-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Isadore Brecher, Appellant, v. 11 West 42nd Street, Inc., Respondent.
    
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    December 21, 1928.
    
      Boskey, Schiller, Marvin & Serling [Saul B. Miners of counsel], for the appellant.
    
      Bond & Babson [Wm. Arthur Babson of counsel], for the respondent.
    
      
       Revg. 132 Mise. 329.
    
   Per Curiam.

Wall v. Hess (232 N. Y. 472) and subsequent authorities relied upon by respondent are inapplicable. A landlord is not privileged to end the tenant’s term by the exercise of an option and at the same time charge him with obligations consistent only with the continuance of the term.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

All concur; present, Bijur, Levy and Crain, JJ.