Case ID: misc_150/html/0901-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Happy Service Garage Corporation, Appellant, v. Francesco Magnante, Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term; First Department,
    March 22, 1934.
    
      
      Anderson, Moss & Merrell [Harry G. Anderson of counsel], for the appellant.
    
      Samuel Mazzola, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

After the discharge of the jury and the entry of a judgment upon a verdict directed for plaintiff the court was without power to vacate that judgment and direct a verdict for the defendant. In any event the evidence sustains plaintiff’s verdict.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment for plaintiff reinstated.

Appeal from order dismissed.

All concur; present, Hammer, Callahan and Frankenthaler, JJ.