Case ID: sw2d_982/html/0795-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dominic LACASTRO, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 73425.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Dec. 22, 1998.
    Amy M. Bartholow, Columbia, for appellant.
    John Munson Morris III, Kevin F. Hen-nessey, Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of driving while intoxicated in violation of section 577.010 RSMo 1994; operating a motor vehicle without a valid license in violation of section 302.020 RSMo (Supp.1995); improper passing on the right in violation of section 304.016 RSMo 1994; and failure to yield to an emergency vehicle in violation of section 304.022 RSMo (Supp.1995).

Defendant was sentenced, respectively, to five years imprisonment, fifteen days in jail and a $50 fine, fifteen days in jail, and a $100 fine. The trial court ordered the terms of confinement to run concurrently with each other and consecutively to a previously imposed prison term.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). 
      
      . Defendant’s name is spelled several different ways throughout the proceedings. We refer to defendant by the name on his Notice of Appeal.