Case ID: nys_72/html/1108-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

INSKY, Respondent, v. MACHAT, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    June, 1901.)
    Action by Solomon Insky against Benjamin Machat.
    M. M. Greénstein, for appellant. E. Rosenthal, for respondent. .
   PER CURIAM.

The infirmity in the trial, whereof this judgment is the result, is that there is no proof that defendant ever satisfied the debt after having reached majority. The only evidence is that he made a promise to one Schwartz in the summer of 1000. The defendant was bom June 5, 1879. So the promise may have been made prior to June 5, 1900. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event.