Case ID: kan_138/html/0007-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 30,872
    Ralph Barrett, Appellant, v. Fred Hurd, Appellee.
    
    (23 P. 2d 1119.)
    Opinion on rehearing filed July 8, 1933.
    (For original opinion of affirmance see 136 Kan. 799, 18 P. 2d 184.)
    
      F. Dumont Smith, Eustace Smith and Claude E. Chalfant, all of Hutchinson, for the appellant.
    
      Harold Payne, of Kinsley, for the appellee.
   Per Curiam:

The original opinion in this case is reported in Barrett v. Hurd, 136 Kan. 799, 18 P. 2d 184. On the motion of appellant a rehearing was allowed and the questions have been re-briefed and reargued. The court again has considered fully the questions involved and is of the opinion the original judgment of affirmance should be adhered to. It is so ordered.