Case ID: nys_74/html/1119-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re ADAMS. In the matter of Alvaro J. Adams, an attorney.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    January 17, 1902.)
   PER CURIAM.

We think that the claim of the petitioners in this matter should be determined upon a summary application at special term, before any action is taken by the appellate division looking toward a further investigation of these charges.' The affidavits submitted by the petitioners in reply to the attorney’s defense are in many respects too vague to be accepted as positive denials. If the summary application results unfavorably to the attorney, this proceeding may be renewed.