Case ID: f-appx_140/html/0618-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jean Gilchrist BROCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Clement Dale POTTER; State of Tennessee, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 04-6051.
    United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
    Aug. 22, 2005.
    Cynthia'A. Wilson, Cookeville, TN, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Leslie A. Bridges, Asst. Atty. General, Office of the Attorney General, Nashville, TN, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: BATCHELDER and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges; GADOLA, District Judge.
    
      
       The Honorable Paul V. Gadola, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.
    
   BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Jean Gilchrist Brock appeals from the magistrate judge’s final order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Clement Dale Potter and the State of Tennessee on Brock’s claims of discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., violation of her constitutional right to intimate association pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and unlawful discharge in violation of the Tennessee Human Rights Act, T.C.A. § 4-21-101 et seq. After carefully reviewing the record, the applicable law, the parties’ briefs and counsels’ arguments, we are convinced that the magistrate judge’s order contains no reversible error either in its determination that no genuine issues of material fact remain for trial or in its conclusions of law. Because the issuance of a full written opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose and would be duplicative, we AFFIRM the grant of summary judgment on the basis of the magistrate judge’s well-reasoned opinion.