Case ID: so2d_572/html/0005-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. CENTENNIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
    No. 90-788.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 4, 1990.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 28, 1991.
    Thompson and Associates and Timothy M. Ingram and Scott M. Whitley, Miami, for appellant.
    Howland & Krieger and Edwin Krieger, Coral Gables, for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

There being no bona fide dispute on this record that the insured, at the time he applied for an automobile insurance policy in Colorado, notified the issuing company that he was a resident of the State of Florida, we affirm the trial court’s summary judgment, which refused to enforce as contrary to Florida law the “other insurance clause of the contract” pursuant to Gillen v. United Services Automobile Association, 300 So.2d 3 (Fla.1974); Gordon v. Russell, 561 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Gustafson v. Jensen, 515 So.2d 1298 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Adams v. Brannan, 500 So.2d 236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Therefore the summary judgment under review is affirmed.