Case ID: tex-crim_116/html/0177-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      LATTIMORE, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

P. E. Smith v. The State.
    No. 13532.
    Delivered June 26, 1930.
    Reported in 31 S. W. (2d) 826.
    The opinion states the. case.
    
      Myres & Pressly of Fort Worth, for appellant.
    
      A. A. Dawson, State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.
   LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for transporting intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

The facts show that on an occasion mentioned appellant passed certain officers near the city limits of Fort Worth; that he was driving rapidly, and upon observing the officers increased his speed so that he was going around fifty miles an hour. The officers’ suspicions being aroused, they pursued him, and after overtaking and stopping him, the officers saw through the opened windows of the car a case of whisky. They said they could see the content of the jars and that same was red whisky. They could see this from the outside. They then searched the car and found it to contain twenty-four half-gallons of whisky.

There are three bills of exception, each complaining of the testimony of the officers, based on the proposition that they had no right to search appellant’s car without a search warrant. We do not believe the contention well founded. The officers observed sufficient evidence of the fact that the law was being violated, prior to their search of appellant’s car. We think they had probable cause as that term is defined in numerous authorities.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.