Case ID: f-appx_60/html/0972-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas HOUSER, a/k/a Robert Joiner, a/k/a Thomas Gross, a/k/a Edward Kingman, a/k/a Tommy King, a/k/a Thomas King, a/k/a Ian Hopkins, a/k/a Tim Hopkins, a/k/a Timothy Hopkins, a/k/a Ian King, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Houser, a/k/a Robert Joiner, a/k/a Thomas Gross, a/k/a Edward Kingman, a/k/a Tommy King, a/k/a Thomas King, a/k/a Ian Hopkins, a/k/a Tim Hopkins, a/k/a Timothy Hopkins, a/k/a Ian King, Defendant-Appellant.
    Nos. 03-6164, 03-6165.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted April 17, 2003.
    Decided April 23, 2003.
    Thomas Houser, Appellant pro se.
    Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Thomas Houser appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for transcripts at the Government’s expense and other documents related to his criminal convictions, which he did not appeal following his guilty plea. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Houser, Nos. CR-01-125; CR-02-36 (E.D.Va. Jan. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.