Case ID: pa-super_110/html/0377-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cubiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Morris v. Bulletin Co., a Corp., Appellant.
    Argued October 5, 1933.
    Before Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Parker and James, JJ.
    
      
      Louis Wagner, and with him Richard A.. Smith and Thomas J. Clary, for appellant.
    
      
      Leon Glaser, and with him Louis Wolfe Schlisman, for appellee.
    October 26, 1933:
   Pee Cubiam,

Thei judgment is affirmed, on the opinion of the learned court below. .

Appellant a.sks for an interpretation of that clause of the Act of April 13, 1927, P. L. 186, sec. 5, which provides: “Whenever any claim for compensation ......is finally adjudicated in favor of the claimant, the amounts of compensation actually due at the time the first payment is made after such adjudication, shall bear interest at the rate of six per centum per annum.” We think the meaning is sufficiently clearly expressed. If an appeal is taken by the employer or insurance carrier from an award! of compensation, thus delaying or postponing the instalments of weekly compensation, and the appeal is unsuccessful, the claimant shall be entitled to receive, at the time of the first payment made on the award, not only the accumulated unpaid instalments of compensation then due and payable, but also interest: at six per cent on the- respective instalments from the time they would have been paid if the appeal had not been taken. The effect of the Act is to put the claimant, when his right to compensation is finally adjudicated in his favor, after appeal, in the same position as if no appeal had been, taken, considering interest at six per cent equivalent to the loss of the use of the money.