Case ID: nys_133/html/1129-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. BURR, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LAARSON, Respondent, v. CAMERON, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    March 1, 1912.)
    Action by Selma Laarson, as administratrix, etc., against Julia E. Cameron.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

BURR, J.,

dissents, upon the ground that a finding that other and different appliances than those furnished by defendant for shifting belts were in common and general use in connection with such machinery as was here employed is against the weight of the evidence, and upon the further ground that plaintiff’s intestate assumed the risk of the employment.