Case ID: f-appx_583/html/0180-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl Eric HOPKINS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-7814.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 11, 2014.
    Decided: Sept. 11, 2014.
    Carl Eric Hopkins, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carl Eric Hopkins appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed.R. Crim.P. 35(b) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hopkins, No. 3:02-cr-00540-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2013). We deny Hopkins’ motion to appoint/assign counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.