Case ID: la_115/html/0249-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "LAND, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(39 South. 447.)
    No. 15,759.
    BARBIER v. NAGEL et al. In re PRESTON et al.
    (July 27, 1905.)
    Action by Henry Barbier against Dr. T. Nagel and others. Judgment for defendants. Application by I. T. and W. Preston for writ of prohibition.
    Denied.
    Rehearing denied November 20, 1905.
    Dufour & Dufour and Henriques & Duchamp, for relators. Respondent judge, pro se. Oregon W. Long and Thomas M. Gill, for respondent Barbier.
   LAND, J.

Considering that prohibition is not a writ of right, and that relators have an adequate remedy by appeal, it is ordered that the provisional writs herein issued 'be recalled, and that relators’ application be denied. State ex rel. Reid v. Judge, 45 La. Ann 947, 13 South. 185; State ex rel. Weber v. Skinner,. 32 La. Ann. 1092; State ex rel. Eollet v. Rightor, Id. 1182.

MONROE and PROVOSTY, JJ., dissent from refusal to grant rehearing.