Case ID: f-supp-2d_237/html/1384-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re ENTERPRISE MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE CO., LLC, SECURITIES LITIGATION
    No. 1495.
    Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
    Dec. 16, 2002.
    Before WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman, JOHN F. KEENAN, MOREY L. SEAR, BRUCE M. SELYA, JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, D. LOWELL JENSEN and J. FREDERICK MOTZ, Judges of the Panel.
    
      
       Judge Sear took no part in the decision of this matter.
    
   TRANSFER ORDER

WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman.

This litigation currently consists of the seven actions in the Southern District of New York and one action in the District of Connecticut listed on the attached Schedule A. Before the Panel is a motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, brought by defendants Enterprise Mortgage Acceptance Company, LLC (EMAC); Koch Industries, Inc.; and Koch Capital Services, LLC for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings of this litigation in the Southern District of New York. Plaintiffs in the District of Connecticut action oppose transfer of their action.

On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, the Panel finds that these eight actions involve common questions of fact, and that centralization under Section 1407 in the Southern District of New York will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. These eight actions share allegations that EMAC and others made fraudulent misrepresentations and omissions in connection with the sale of interests in securitized loans to certain institutional investors between 1998 and 2000. Centralization under Section 1407 is thus necessary in order to eliminate duplicative discovery, prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings, and conserve the resources of the parties, their counsel and the judiciary.

The Southern District of New York stands out as the appropriate transferee forum for this litigation. We note that seven of the eight actions are pending in this district and have been consolidated before one judge. In addition, relevant documents and witnesses can be expected to be found within the Southern District of New York because the consulting firm closing the affairs of EMAC, which has ceased operations as an active business, is located there, as are the various investment banks involved in the securities offerings.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, the action listed on the attached Schedule A and pending outside the Southern District of New York is transferred to the Southern District of New York and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Shirley Wohl Kram for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions listed on Schedule A and pending in that district.

SCHEDULE A

MDL-1495—In re Enterprise Mortgage Acceptance Co., LLC, Securities Litigation

District of Connecticut

Diversified Asset Securitization Holdings I, LP, et al. v. Enterprise Mortgage

Acceptance Co., LLC, et al., C.A. No. 3:02-1024

Southern District of New York

In re EMAC Securities Litigation, C.A. No. 1:02-2237

ING Investment Management, LLC, et al. v. Enterprise Mortgage Acceptance Co., LLC, et al., C.A. No. 1:02-2369

Northern Life Insurance Co., et al. v. Enterprise Mortgage Acceptance Co., LLC, et al., C.A. No. 1:02-2941

Nationwide Life Insurance Co., et al. v. Enterprise Mortgage Acceptance Co., LLC, et al., C.A. No. 1:02-4430

Aetna Life Insurance Co., et al. v. Enterprise Mortgage Acceptance Co., LLC, et al., C.A. No. 1:02-4455

Physicians Life Insurance Co. v. Enterprise Mortgage Acceptance Co., LLC, et al., C.A. No. 1:02-4553

Great Southern Life Insurance Co., et al. v. Enterprise Mortgage Acceptance Co., LLC, et al., C.A. No. 1:02-4653