Case ID: sw3d_576/html/0340-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Amar GREEN-BEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 106523
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    FILED: June 11, 2019
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Lisa M. Stroup, Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
    ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Eric Schmitt, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
    Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM

Amar Green-Bey ("Movant") appeals from the Judgment dismissing his untimely pro se Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm the motion court's dismissal of the underlying post-conviction case based on the untimeliness of the pro se motion.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).