Case ID: sw3d_510/html/0364-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Marcell SMITH, Appellant.
    No. ED 104014
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Filed: February 7, 2017
    Rosalynn Koch, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
    Josh Hawley, Christine Katherine Les-icko, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before James M. Dowd, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Marcell Smith appeals his convictions by a St. Louis County jury of one count of first-degree robbery, one count of second-degree assault, and two counts of armed criminal action arising out of the robbery and shooting of Roosevelt Phillips, Jr. (“Victim”). Smith raises two points on appeal: 1) that the trial court abused its discretion in sustaining the State’s objection to Smith calling Victim’s wife to testify at trial; and 2) that the trial court plainly eiTed in failing to sua sponte intervene during the State’s cross-examination of Tiffany Lindewirth. Finding no error, we affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25,