Case ID: so2d_452/html/0997-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Annie R. HENNINGTON, Warren C. Wood, Raymond Lee, Edward Kreske and Victoria Kreske, his wife, Alexander Pollack and Rosalind Pollack, his wife, Appellants, v. Lester CUNNINGHAM, Appellee.
    No. 83-2812.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 19, 1984.
    Rehearing Denied July 31, 1984.
    Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Miami, for appellants.
    Edward C. Tietig, Miami, for appellee.
    Before HUBBART, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The trial court's finding of an implied grant of easement will not be disturbed because it is supported by competent and substantial evidence. See Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). We remand, however, with instructions to amend the final judgment to include a legal description of the easement. See Roy v. Euro-Holland Vastgoed, B.V., 404 So.2d 410 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.