Case ID: f-appx_169/html/0797-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George L. SPENCER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul WILLIAMS, Dr.; Vicki Phipps, Rncb/Don; F. Taylor, Grievance Coordinator; R. Mullins, Grievance Coordinator; Tracy S. Ray, Warden, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 05-7868.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 23, 2006.
    Decided: March 6, 2006.
    George L. Spencer, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

George L. Spencer appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000), his action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), for failure to state a claim and the court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Spencer v. Williams, No. CA-05-627-7 (W.D.Va. Oct. 19, 2005; Nov. 2, 2005). We deny Spencer’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED