Case ID: sw2d_902/html/0326-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re MARRIAGE OF Douglas F. ADAMS and Karen J. Adams. Douglas F. ADAMS, Petitioner/Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. Karen J. ADAMS, Respondent/Respondent/Cross-Appellant.
    Nos. 65202, 65278.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    June 6, 1995.
    Rehearing Denied July 24, 1995.
    W. Morris Taylor, William K. Meehan, W. Morris Taylor, P.C., St. Louis, for appellant/respondent.
    Allan H. Zerman, Cary J. Mogerman, Zer-man & Mogerman, Clayton, for respondent/appellant.
    Before CRANE, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Both parties appeal from the trial court’s judgment in a dissolution case. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detañed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).