Case ID: f_160/html/0558-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WOUVERTON, District Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte DURAND.
    (District Court, D. Oregon.
    March 16, 1908.)
    No. 4,998.
    ' Aliens — Statutes — Reveal — Saving Clause — Effect—Exclusion—ProstiTUTES.
    Act Cong. March 3, 1903, c. 1012, § 2, 32 Stat. 1214, and Act Feb. 20,1907, c. 1134, § 2, 34 Stat. 898, provide for the exclusion of alien prostitutes. Section 21 of the 1903 act (32 Stat. 1218) provides for the deportation of aliens found in the United States “in violation of this act” within three years of their landing. Section 21 of the 1907 act (34 Stat. 905) provides for the deportation of aliens subject to deportation under that act or “any” other federal law within the same period. Section 28 of the 1907 act (34 Stat. 907) provides that such act shall not affect any prosecution, suit, action, or proceeding brought, or any “act, thing or matter, civil or criminal, done or existing at the time of the táking effect of” the act, and that as to all such “acts, things or matters,” etc., the laws or parts of laws repealed or amended are continued in force. Held, that section 28 con-tiiraes in force the 1908 act as to the exclusion of alien prostitutos, and saves the government's right to deport one who landed in 1900, though no proceeding was brought for that purpose until 1908.
    James Gleason, for petitioner,
    Wm. C. Bristol, U. S. Atty„
   WOUVERTON, District Judge.

The applicant is being held on a warrant issued by Hon. Herbert Knox Smith, Acting Secretary of Commerce and Babor of the United States of America, bearing date February 5, 1908, which recites the following:

“That whereas, it appears to me from proof submitted to J. H. Barbour, local inspector at Portland, Oregon, that Louise lieaux, alias Flora Durand, wlio landed at tho port of New York, ex. S. S. Lucania, on the 14th day of January, 1906, in violation of acts of Congress approved February 20, 1907, and March 3, 1903, and that said alien is a prostitute and was such at the time of her entry into the United States, and that she entered the United States for tho purpose of prostitution, and that she was found an inmate of a house of prostitution within throe years after her entry; and whereas, the period of three years after landing lias not elapsed — I, Herbert Knox Smith, Acting Secretary of Commerce and Labor, by virtue of the power and authority vested in me by the laws of the United States, do hereby command you to return the said alien to Hie country whence she came. * * * For doing so this shall be your sufficient warrant.”

It is urged that the petitioner is being unlawfully held by reason of the fact that she landed in the United States while Act Cong. March 3, 1903, c. 1012, 32 Stat. 1213, was in force, and prior to the adoption of Act Feb. 20, 1907, c. 1131, 34 Stat'. 898; it being argued that the latter act repeals the former, without any saving clause adequate to its continuance in force in so far as it relates to the act oí the petitioner in coming within the territory of the United States, being a prostitute. The act of 1903 (by section 2) provides:

“That the following classes of aliens shall be excluded from admission into the United Slates: * * * Prostilutes, and persons who procure or attempt to bring in prostitutes or women for the purpose of prostitution.”

By the twenty-first section of the act it is further provided:

“That in caso tho Secretary of the Treasury shall be satisfied that an alien has been found in tho United States in violation of this act he shall causé such alien, within tho period of three years after landing or entry therein, to be taken into custody and returned to the country whence he came, as provided in section 20 of this act,” etc.

The act of 1907 provides (section 2):

“That the following classes of aliens shall be excluded from admission Into the United States: * * * Prostitutes, or women or girls coming into tho United States for the purpose of prostitution or for any other immoral purpose.”

Section 21 of this act provides as follows:

“That in case the Secretary of Commerce and Labor shall bo satisfied that an alien has been found in tho United States in violation of this act, or that an alien is subject to deportation under the provisions of this act or of any law of the United States, he shall cause such alien within the period of three years after landing or entry therein to be taken into custody and returned to the country whence he came, as provided by section twenty of this act,” etc.

Section 28 provides:

“That nothing contained in this act shall be construed to affect any p-cution, suit, action, or proceedings brought, or any act, thing, or matter, <. or criminal, done or existing at the time of the taking effect of this act; but as to all such prosecutions, suits, actions, proceedings, acts, things, or matters the laws or parts of laws repealed or amended by this act are hereby continued in force and effect.”

And section 43 repeals the act of 1903, except section 34 thereof.

The sole question for consideration is whether the saving clause, or section 28 of the act of 1907, by intendment continues in force the act of 1903 as it relates to the exclusion of prostitutes from admission into the United States. It is conceded t\at, if any suit or proceeding had been pending relative to the deportation of the applicant at the time the act of 1907 took effect, such suit or proceeding would have been saved by section 28; but it is denied that such section is effective as to the act of the individual where no suit or proceeding has been begun. The language of the section is very specific, and relates to “any act, thing, or matter, civil or criminal, done or existing at the time of the taking effect of this act.” As to all of such “the laws or parts of laws repealed or amended by this act are * * * continued in force and effect.” The act of 1903 plainly provided that prostitutes should be excluded. The act of 1907 also provides for the same thing; and they may be deported within three years from the time of their entry into the United States. The act, offense, or transgression of law is the same in both statutes, and to my mind section 28 of the later act clearly continued the former in force as to that act, offense, or transgression of law of the petitioner whereby she is subject to deportation. The saving clause is unusual, by reason of including acts and things not in suit or action; but the very fact that such acts and things are specifically named shows the intendment of Congress to save the old act as to them, as well as to matters in suit or proceedings brought.

Another thought confirms this view. The time after entry into the United States within which deportation may be had is made th? same ■ — three years — in the new act as in the old; and section 21 of the later act is made to apply to an alien “subject to deportatioi under the provisions of this act or of any law of the United States,” while the old law applies to an alien “found in the United States in viola-tien of this act,” thus showing a purpose to embrace any law of the United States, and an intendment to include the act of 1903 so far as in force. So that, construing this section with section 28,, it is made reasonably clear that the act of 1907 was intended to embrace “acts” and “things” falling within the purview of the law of 1903, for which deportation would have been proper if arising within three years.

The petition will therefore be denied.