Case ID: sw3d_99/html/0003-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Javier DIAZ, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent.
    No. ED 80859.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Dec. 17, 2002.
    Carl Ward, Clayton, for appellant.
    
      James A. Chenault III, Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Javier Diaz appeals the judgment sustaining the Director of Revenue’s decision to suspend Diaz’s driver’s license. Diaz argues that the Director failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that there was probable cause to arrest him for driving while intoxicated.

The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).