Case ID: ga-app_29/html/0286-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

14006.
    Jones v. The State.
    Decided December 12, 1922.
    Indictment for larceny from house; from Wilkes superior court — Judge Shurley. September 20, 1922.
    
      Hugh B. Combs, for plaintiff in error.
    
      M. L. Felts, solicitor-general, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

The evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt; and, the special grounds of the motion for a new trial not being argued or insisted upon in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error, the judgment of the lower court refusing a new trial is

Affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Lulce, J., concur.