Case ID: nj_68/html/0324-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ESTELLE WOLINER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JACK WOLINER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued September 8, 1975
    Decided September 23, 1975.
    
      Mr. Bernard Rudd argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Rudd and Ackerman, attorneys; Mr. Neil Braun on the brief).
    
      Mr. Ernest Prupis argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Weltchek, Prupis and Ritz, attorneys).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for .the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes, Justices Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman, Clifford and Sohreiber and Judge Conford — 7.

For reversal — None.