Case ID: sw3d_352/html/0423-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel W. FOSTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 96661.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Nov. 8, 2011.
    
      Daniel W. Foster, Charleston, MO, pro se.
    Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Foster appeals the motion court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction DNA testing under Section 547.035 RSMo. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the recoi’d on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).