Case ID: fla_102/html/0062-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam. Brown, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles J. Mathews, Appellant, vs. William Pihos, Stella Pihos, his wife, George Pihos, single, Florida-Carolina Development Corporation, a Florida corporation, R. R. Ragen, Ayers Electric Company, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
    
    135 So. 531.
    Division A.
    Decision filed June 17, 1931.
    
      Sherman & Bainum, for Appellant;
    
      Dickinson & Dickinson, for Appellees.
   Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the orders and decrees herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said orders and decrees; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said orders and decrees of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

Buford, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell and Davis, J. J., concur.

Brown, J.

(Concurring in part and dissenting in part) :

I think this ease should be affirmed upon condition that a remittitur of $950.00 be entered.

Whitfield, J., concurs.