Case ID: mj_1/html/0213-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: FERGUSON, Senior Judge", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Richard R. RADA, Private, U.S. Army, Appellant.
    No. 30,826.
    U. S. Court of Military Appeals.
    Nov. 7, 1975.
    
      Colonel Alton H. Harvey, Captain Michael R. Caryl, and Captain John M. Nolan were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.
    
      Captain Larry R. McDowell and Captain Richard S. Kleager were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

Here, as in United States v. Cree, 1 M.J. 210 (1975), the accused contends that the staff judge advocate’s post-trial review is erroneous and prejudicial because it includes a summary of the evidence of an offense of which the accused was acquitted. For the reasons set out in our opinion in Cree, we affirm the decision of the Court of Military Review.

FERGUSON, Senior Judge

(dissenting):

For the reasons set forth in my dissent in United States v. Cree, 1 M.J. 210 (1975), I dissent.