Case ID: nys_84/html/1130-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HORENBURGER et al., Appellants, v. ROTH, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    June 22, 1903.)
    Action by Herman Horenburger and others against Isaac . Roth. Judgment for defendant dnd plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.
    A. J. Westermayr, for appellants. Hoffman & Wahle, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

There was nothing but a question of fact to be submitted to the jury in this case. This was done by the trial judge in a charge to which no exception was taken. We see no reason for disturbing the verdict of the jury. Judgment affirmed, with costs.