Case ID: njl_130/html/0557-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HENRIETTE GUNTHER, RESPONDENT, v. THE MOREY LARUE LAUNDRY COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Argued May 18, 1943
    Decided September 16, 1943.
    For the respondent, Charles A. Otto, Jr.
    
    For the appellant, Martin P. O’Connor.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 6.

For reversal — The Chief Justice, Case, Donges, Porter, Dear, JJ. 5.