Case ID: ind-app_36/html/0703-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Myers, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Pere Marquette Railroad Company v. Palmer. Same v. McGovern. Same v. McCaully. Same v. Strobel. Same v. Jones. Same v. Sharzinski. Same v. Kubsch. Same v. Nimmo. Same v. Skurath. Same v. Folk. Same v. Palmer. Same v. Koch. Same v. Black. Same v. McMannis. Same v. Jones.
    
      [No. 5,241.
    [No. 5,242.]
    [No. 5,243.]
    [No. 5,244.]
    [No. 5,245.]
    Filed May 23, 1905.
    Rehearing denied August 1, 1905.
    Transfer denied November 1, 190§.]
    
      [No. 5,246.]
    [No. 5,247.]
    [No. 5,248.]
    [No. 5,249.]
    [No. 5,250.]
    [No. 5,251.]
    [No. 5,252.]
    [No. 5,253.]
    [No. 5,254.]
    [No. 5,255.
    All (except No. 5,241) filed June 30, 1905.
    Petitions for rehearing denied November 2, 1905.]
    From Laporte Superior Court; Harry B. Tuthill, Judge.
    Suits against the Pere Marquette Railroad Company. From decrees againsfr defendant it appeals.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    
      M. T. Krueger and James F. Gallaher, for appellant.
    
      C. R. & J. B. Collins, for appellees.
   Myers, P. J.

The questions presented for our consideration in • each of the fifteen preceding cases being precisely the same as in Pere Marquette R. Co. v. Smith (1905), ante, 439, on the authority of that case and the case of Pere Marquette R. Co. v. Baertz (1905), ante, 408, the judgment of the lower court in each of the above causes is affirmed.