Case ID: sw2d_835/html/0524-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mark BRADLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 61109.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    July 7, 1992.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 12, 1992.
    Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 22, 1992.
    Deborah B. Wafer, St. Louis, for appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Rudolph R. Rhodes, IV, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Mark Bradley, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, the transcript and the legal files and find the motion court’s finding of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. As we further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the motion court’s ruling pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.