Case ID: va-cir_6/html/0045-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "By JUDGE EDWARD L. RYAN, JR.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK
    Commonwealth of Virginia v. Bradley Peirsol
    May 18, 1983
   By JUDGE EDWARD L. RYAN, JR.

Statements made during a custodial interrogation and while intoxicated are not per se involuntary or inadmissible. The test is whether the defendant’s "will was overborne" or whether the statements were the "product of a rational intellect and a free will." Yarborough v. Commonwealth, 217 Va. 971 (1977) (citing United States Supreme Court and Circuit Court of Appeal cases).

The evidence shows generally that defendant was intoxicated but there was also sufficient evidence to show that defendant’s will was not overborne.

Defendant’s motion to suppress is overruled.