Case ID: pa_635/html/0191-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

133 A.3d 290
    COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Hubert MICHAEL, Respondent.
    No. 78 EM 2015.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    March 7, 2016.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of March, 2016, the Application for Leave to File a Reply is GRANTED, and the Petition for Extraordinary Relief Pursuant to King’s Bench Jurisdiction is DENIED.

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.