Case ID: ind-app_83/html/0020-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Nichols, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Allen v. Allen.
    [No. 12,286.
    Filed April 23, 1925.]
    
      Appeal.—Appellant’s brief must present, the errors for review so they can be determined without resort to the record.—The action of the court in ruling on a demurrer to a pleading is not presented for review if the pleading is not set out in appellant’s brief, as an appellant must so prepare his brief that the questions sought to be presented can be determined without resort to the record.
    From Vigo Superior Court; William T. Gleason, Judge.
    
      Action by Grace B. Allen against Milton Allen. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. Affirmed. By the second division.
    
      Reichman & Douglas, for appellant.
    
      A. Z. Thomas and J. T. Walker, for appellee.
   Nichols, J.

Action by appellee to enjoin appellant from diverting water falling on his land from a natural watercourse, and casting upon the land of appellee. The only error assigned is the action of the court in overruling appellant’s demurrer to appellee’s reply to the second paragraph of answer. Appellant has failed to set out the reply and the demurrer thereto. Appellant must so prepare his brief that the questions sought to be presented therein can be determined without resort to the record. Pugh, Admr., v. Cleveland, etc., R. Co. (1915), 184 Ind. 350, 110 N. E. 193; Whipple v. Cain (1920), 73 Ind. App. 285, 127 N. E. 283.

Nothing is presented.

Affirmed.