Case ID: cust-ct_45/html/0280-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Wilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 64578.
    Quimet Stay & Leather Co. v. United States,
    protest 59/5113 (New York).
   Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise in question, invoiced as “4 casks Artificial resin harmless,” was appraised as entered and that no appeal was filed by the collector, although on liquidation he used a higher value, it was held that 'the proper dutiable value of the merchandise was the entered value, as represented by the final appraised value.