Case ID: nev_86/html/0161-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ELMO LAW, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
    No. 6033
    March 5, 1970
    466 P.2d 656
    
      James D. Santini, Public Defender, and Robert G. Legakes, Deputy Public Defender, Clark County, for Appellant.
    
      Harvey Dickerson, Attorney General, George E. Franklin, Jr., District Attorney, and Addeliar D. Guy, Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.
   OPINION

Per Curiam:

The briefs and the record on appeal having been given full consideration, and finding that there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the jury verdict below, and that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error, the respondent’s motion to dismiss this appeal is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Sanchez v. State, 85 Nev. 95, 450 P.2d 793 (1969).