Case ID: ad2d_80/html/0964-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(March 20, 1981)
    Richard B. Hobart et al., Appellants, v David Schuler, Respondent.
   Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies .that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness óf its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: “Was the order of Special Term, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, correct as a matter of law?” Sweeney, J.P., Main, Mikoll and Casey, JJ., concur.