Case ID: so2d_609/html/0347-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David GRAHAM, Plaintiff-Respondent v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, Defendant-Applicant.
    No. 24930-CW.
    Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.
    Jan. 7, 1993.
    Sutherland, Juge, Horack & Dwyer by Denis Paul Juge and Kristi Lyn Stroebel, New Orleans, for defendant-applicant.
    Curtis Daniel Street, Monroe, for plaintiff-respondent.
    Before SEXTON, BROWN and STEWART, JJ.
   WRIT DENIED.

Upon a review of the record before us, the exercise of this court’s supervisory jurisdiction is not warranted. Due to the unique nature of videotaped surveillance, this evidence is subject to discovery even though intended for impeachment purposes. Collins v. Crosby Group, Inc., 551 So.2d 42 (La.App. 1st Cir.1989), writs denied, 556 So.2d 39 (La.1990) and 556 So.2d 42 (La.1990).