Case ID: f-appx_472/html/0653-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Peggy O’Neal GONZALES; Trayvon Guy; Daniel P. Bell; Shanita Lashaun Allen Bell; Latoya Timmons; Crystal McGee; Cesar Sis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF INGLEWOOD; Ronald C. Banks; Detective Brian Bruce; Detective Javier Alcala; Sergeant Hector Ramirez; Detective Joseph Cupo; Detective Chris Wunno; Detective Jose Gonzales; Los Angeles County Probation Department; Debbie A. Nelson; Officer Joe Velasquez; Special Agent Ronald Reed; Sue Dutcher, Defendants-Appellees. Peggy O’Neal Gonzales; Trayvon Guy; Daniel P. Bell; Shanita Lashaun Allen Bell; Latoya Timmons; Crystal McGee; Cesar Sis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. City of Inglewood; Ronald C. Banks; Detective Brian Bruce; Detective Javier Alcala; Sergeant Hector Ramirez; Detective Joseph Cupo; Detective Chris Wunno; Detective Jose Gonzales; Los Angeles County Probation Department; Debbie A. Nelson; Officer Joe Velasquez; Special Agent Ronald Reed; Sue Dutcher, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 08-57039, 09-55785.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 12, 2012.
    
    Filed April 16, 2012.
    Eric C. Jacobson, Ferie C. Jacobson Law Offices, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    George L. Mallory, Jr., Esquire, George L. Mallory, Jr. & Associates, Jonathan McCaverty, Office of the County Counsel, John E. Nordin, II, Assistant U.S., Tim Laske, Esquire, Assistant U.S., USLAOffice of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and TUNHEIM, District Judge.
    
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
    
      
       The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its well-reasoned orders.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.