Case ID: so2d_583/html/1095-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Randall S. PIERCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 90-1018.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    July 17, 1991.
    On Motion for Rehearing Aug. 15, 1991.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara L. Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nancy Ryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

GOSHORN, C.J., DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

We grant appellant’s motion for rehearing for the purpose of certifying the following question to be of great public importance:

DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?

Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

AFFIRMED.

GOSHORN, C.J., and DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur.