Case ID: f-appx_445/html/0251-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Freddy MEDINA-VALENCIA, a.k.a. El Indio, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 10-15752
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Oct. 26, 2011.
    Yvette Rhodes, Christopher Francis Murray, Robert E. O’Neill, David Paul Rhodes, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Cynthia Judith Hernandez, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Jose Freddy Medina-Valencia, Yazoo City, MS, pro se.
    Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Cynthia Hernandez, appointed counsel for Jose Medina-Valencia, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Medina-Valencia, in response, has filed a motion seeking permission to proceed informa pauperis, and to file a pro se brief. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Medina-Valencia’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

Medina-Valencia’s motion seeking permission to proceed informa pauperis, and to file a pro se brief, is DENIED as moot.