Case ID: ad2d_1/html/0651-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Pavia & Co. S. P. A., et al., Appellants, v. Siegel Chemical Co., Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Great Eastern Parking & Paper Stock Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
   Motion denied. The parties should be able to stipulate to eliminate from the printed record on appeal such parts of the examinations as are not essential to the questions presented on the appeal. Costs and disbursements may be imposed upon respondents if the printed record on appeal is found to be needlessly extended. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Bastow, Botein and Rabin, JJ.