Case ID: sw3d_191/html/0678-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James COX, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 86133.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    May 9, 2006.
    Nelson G. Wolff, Schlichter, Bogard & Denton, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Thomas E. Jones, James W. Erwin, Heath H. Hooks, Thompson Coburn LLP, Belleville, IL, for appellant.
    Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for plaintiff in a FELA case. The evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient. No error of law appears.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).