Case ID: wis_171/html/0202-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Knapp, Plaintiff in error, vs. The State, Defendant in error.
    
      February 14
    
    March 9, 1920.
    
    
      Bastardy: Evidence: Sufficiency.
    
    In a bastardy proceeding, the evidence is held to support a conviction.
    Error to review a judgment of the municipal court of Outagamie county: Albert M. Spencer, Judge.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by Ryan & Cary of Appleton, and oral argüment by Thomas H. Ryan.
    
    For the defendant in error there was a brief by the Attorney General and /. E. Messer schmidt, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Mr. Messerschmidt.
    
   Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error was convicted of bastardy and sued out a writ of error. His sole contention is that the judgment is not supported by the evidence. An examination of the record satisfies us that the judgment is supported by the evidence and should not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.