Case ID: ohio-law-abs_5/html/0172-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 214
    STATE ex HOLMES v. THATCHER
    No. 20317.
    Supreme Court
    In mandamus.
    Dock. Feb. 9, 1927,
    5 Abs. 105.
    747. MANDAMUS — Does Mandamus lie to compel county to pay share of salary of municipal judges and does Sec. 1558-48 GC. which provides for city, county payment violate Art. II, Sec. 20 of the constitution?
    First Publication of this Case
    Attorneys — F. Rubrecht, J. N. Linton, P. M. Herbert & B. W. Gearheart for State ex; J. J. Chester, Jr., L. T. Williams for Thatcher; all of Columbus.
   This is an action in mandamus to compel payment by county of its share of the salary of Municipal Judge and same also raises question as to whether or not Sec. 1558-4 8 GC. which provides for city, county payment of, violates Art. II, Sec. 20 of the constitution.

Note — Demurrer to pet. sustained, and judgment fox defendant, 5 Abs. 154.