Case ID: ky-op_6/html/0061-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Judge Pryor:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Commonwealth v. Greenup Nichell.
    Indictment and Information — Allegations of Offense — Bar.
    An indictmen/t must allege tlie offense witli such. Certainty as to enable accused to know what he is called upon to defend, and to constitute a bar to 'any subsequent prosecution for the same offense.
    Larceny — Indictment—Money—Description.
    An indictment which simply charges that a number of United States Treasury notes and National Bank notes were feloniously taken by accused, without any further description of the same, was held insufficient.
    APPEAL PROM ROWAN CIRCUIT COURT.
    December 8, 1872.
   Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

An indictment must allege the offense with such certainty as to enable the accused to know what he is called upon to defend and to constitute a bar to any subsequent' prosecution for the same offense.

In this indictment there is no description of the bank bills alleged to have been stolen either as to the number of bills, or the amount, and no description whatever given, except that a number of United States treasury notes and national bank notes were feloni-ously taken by the accused.

The accused from: this accusation is unable to know whether he is charged with stealing two bank notes or twenty bank notes of the denomination of .five dollars or one hundred dollars, and hence could prepare no defense based upon the idea that he had and owned as his own property certain treasury notes answering the description given by the indictment, as he is in entire ignorance as to the description of the paper the commonwealth will produce evidencing his guilt.

The judgment is affirmed.

-, for appellee.