Case ID: njl_65/html/0680-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. HENRY C. KELSEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued November 28, 1900
    Decided January 25, 1901.
    ■'On error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiff in error, William M. Lanning and Richard ¥. Lindabury.
    
    'For the defendant in error, Samuel H. Grey, attorney-general.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Chief Justice Magie. 35 Froom 1. .

For affirmance—Depot (Chief Justice), Dixon; Colxins, Fort, Bogert, Krueger, Hendrickson, Adams, “Fredenburgh, Voori-iees. 10.

JJor reversal—-None.