Case ID: ohio-st-3d_69/html/0070-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State ex rel. Yonkings, Appellant, v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 70.]
    (No. 93-2552
    Submitted March 1, 1994
    Decided April 20, 1994.)
    
      Charles B. Yonkings, pro se.
    
    
      Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Joshua T. Cox, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reason stated in the court’s opinion, i.e., declaratory judgment provides an adequate remedy to appellant and its availability was thus an appropriate basis to deny the writ. State ex rel. Citizens for Fair Taxation v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 749, 752, 591 N.E.2d 691, 693; State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovern (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 129, 11 OBR 426, 464 N.E.2d 525, paragraph two of the syllabus; R.C. 2731.05.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.