Case ID: ala-app_22/html/0280-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SAMFORD, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(115 So. 79)
    TRAWICK v. STATE.
    (4 Div. 346.)
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    Nov. 29, 1927.
    Rehearing Denied Dec. 20, 1927.
    D. A. Baker, of Troy, and G,uy W. Winn, of Clayton, for appellant.
    Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.
   SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted on a charge of possessing prohibited liquors, and he appeals.

The evidence in this record has been examined, and we find sufficient facts to authorize a jury in finding the defendant guilty as charged. We further 'are of the opinion that there is no reversible error in any of. the rulings of the court. The judgment of guilt is affirmed.

The sentence as to costs is indefinite, ■ and for that reason the cause is remanded for proper sentence in conformity with section 5291, Code 1923; Collins v. State, 21 Ala. App. 594, 110 So. 479.

Affirmed and remanded for proper sentence.