Case ID: f-appx_511/html/0268-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Darrell Lee WITTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor HARRIS, Institution Doctor, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 12-8134.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 21, 2013.
    Decided: Feb. 26, 2013.
    Darrell Lee Witts, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, Pender & Coward, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   PER CURIAM:

Darrell Lee Witts appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Witts v. Harris, No. 2:11-cv-00423-RAJ-DEM (E.D.Va. Nov. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.