Case ID: sw3d_499/html/0387-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Steven TRAMBLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 103709
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISON TWO.
    Filed: September 27, 2016
    
      Kent Denzel, Columbia, MO, for Petitioner/Appellant
    Rachel S. Flaster, Jefferson' City, MO, for Defendant/Respondent
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Tramble (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).