Case ID: ad2d_8/html/0949-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alice Cunningham, Appellant, v. Isidore L. Malbin et al., Respondents.
   In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from an order which on reargument adhered to the original decision denying appellant’s application for a preference under rule 9 of the- Kings County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules, unless she consent within a stated time to an ftTrn.minfl.tion by a physician to be designated by the court, in which event the decision on reargument will be held in abeyance. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. On the basis of the medical proof submitted on the application, a denial of a preference was warranted. In the circumstances, the conditional order appealed from was within the bounds of the court’s discretion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.