Case ID: njl_81/html/0574-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ANTONY S. RUDDY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. UNITED ASSOCIATION JOURNEYMEN PLUMBERS, &c., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.
    Submitted December 5, 1910
    Decided March 6, 1911.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 50 Yroom 467.
    For the plaintiffs in error, Joseph A. Beecher and Samuel Kalisch.
    
    For the defendant in error, Samuel Press and Harry Kalisch.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of Mr. Justice Reed in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance-—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Bogert, AAre-DENBURGH, AAllOOM, CONGDON, SULLIVAN, JJ. 12.

For reversal—None.