Case ID: ohio-st-3d_64/html/0032-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Columbus Bar Association v. Baer.
    [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Baer (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 32.]
    (No. 91-2502
    Submitted April 7, 1992
    Decided June 17, 1992.)
    
      
      David S. Bloomfield, Gus Robbins-Penniman and Bruce A. Campbell, for relator.
    
      Charles W. Kettlewell and Mark H. Aultman, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, we order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and Resnick, JJ., concur. H. Brown, J., dissents.

Herbert R. Brown, J., dissenting. I believe that a public reprimand is the appropriate sanction.