Case ID: sw3d_165/html/0195-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Reginald JONES, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 84743.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    June 21, 2005.
    Michelle Murphy Rivera, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Deborah Daniels, Lisa Kennedy, Co-Counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Reginald Jones (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Batson challenge. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s challenge was not clearly erroneous. State v. Costello, 101 S.W.3d 311, 312 (Mo.App. E.D.2003). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b). 
      
      . Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986).