Case ID: kan_111/html/0765-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 23,877.
    No. 23,878.
    No. 23,879.
    No. 23,880.
    No. 23,881.
    V. H. Hornor, Appellant, v. E. N. Van Hosen et al., Appellees. J. W. Wilson, Appellant, v. E. N. Van Hosen et al., Appellees. W. H. Johnson, Appellant, v. E. N. Van Hosen et al., Appellees. F. C. Randel and G. W. Daugherty, Appellants, v. E. N. Van Hosen et al., Appellees. Orin H. Norton, Appellant, v. E. N. Van Hosen et al., Appellees.
    
    Appeal from Morton district court; Charles E. Vance, judge.
    Opinion filed July 8, 1922.
    Reversed.
    
      G. W. Sawyer, and John C. King, both of Liberal, for the appellants.
    
      A. C. Malloy, R. C. Davis, Warren H. White, all of Hutchinson, and Arthur L. Maltby, of Elkhart, for the appellees.
   Per Curiam:

These cases are reversed and remanded with directions to overrule the demurrers to the petitions for the reasons set out in the opinion in Schmoyer v. Van Hosen, just decided (ante, p. 759), the facts being substantially the same.