Case ID: cust-ct_2/html/0663-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dallingee, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 41057.
    Protests 909367-G, etc., of Schall & Co. (A Corp.) et al. (New York).
   Opinion by

Dallingee, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel baskets and bookends chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339. Baskets and candelabra plated with silver were held dutiable at 50 percent under the same paragraph. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445) and Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816) cited.