Case ID: sw2d_922/html/0440-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

E.C. & Charles Harter, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Lloyd MIESNER, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. 68786.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    May 21, 1996.
    Charles A. Harter, Washington, for appellants.
    Steven P. Kuenzel, Eekelkamp, Eckel-kamp, Wood & Kuenzel, Washington, for respondent.
    Before GERARD M. SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.
   MEMORANDUM DECISION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from the entry of judgment for defendant in a small claim trial de novo concerning an automobile collision. The trial court acted within its discretion in refusing to allow a rebuttal witness to testify. Plaintiffs’ other claims of error all involve questions of credibility, for which we defer to the trial court. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a statement of the reasons for the Court’s decision.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).