Case ID: fla_149/html/0531-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

R. M. RHODEN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
    6 So. (2nd) 378
    En Banc
    February 17, 1942
    Gregory & Towles, E. Paul Gregory, for appellant.
    J. Tom Watson, Attorney General, Nathan Cockrell, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM:

Appellant was indicted charged with the' offense of murder in the first degree and, on trial, was convicted of the crime of manslaughter, from which judgment he has prosecuted this appeal.

The only question presented for our consideration is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment. The transcript of the testimony has been examined and considered and is found to be amply sufficient to have sustained a verdict and judgment of a higher degree of unlawful homicide than manslaughter.

On the entire record no reversible error is made to appear.

The judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BUFORD and THOMAS, JJ., concurring.

CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., dissenting.