Case ID: f-appx_367/html/0473-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. James VASSELL, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 09-7208.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 18, 2010.
    Decided: Feb. 23, 2010.
    
      James Vassell, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Thomas Oliver Muck-low, Assistant United States Attorneys, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Vassell appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motions for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Vassell, No. 3:89-cr-00190-JPB-JES-1 (N.D.W. Va. May 20 & June 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.