Case ID: njl_74/html/0599-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FLETCHER HUMPHREY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. CHARLES W. EAKELEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted July 9, 1906 —
    Decided January 2, 1907.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiff in error, Alexander Grant and James B. McKee.
    
    For the defendant in error, Theodore Baches.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment brought here by this writ óf error is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Garrison in the Supreme Court, reported in 43 Vroom 425.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Eeed, Trenci-iard, Bogert, Vredenburgii, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 14.

For reversal — None.