Case ID: sw3d_18/html/0555-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Brenda Louise DYE, Appellant, v. Elliott Hoyt DYE, Respondent.
    No. ED 76625.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    May 30, 2000.
    Aaron S. Dubin, Clayton, for appellant.
    Elliott Hoyt Dye, Granite City, IL, pro se.
    Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Brenda Louise Dye appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to modify the parties’ decree of dissolution. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(1).