Case ID: f2d_319/html/0858-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, for the Use and Benefit of Gerald S. GOODMAN, and Gerald S. Goodman, Appellants, v. R. P. FARNSWORTH & COMPANY, Inc. and Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Appellees.
    No. 20186.
    United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
    June 25, 1963.
    Rehearing Denied Aug. 12, 1963.
    Kenneth G. Burgess, Hugh T. Ward, Peters, Tuck & Ward, Shreveport, La., for appellants.
    
      A. Morgan Brian, Jr., Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, 'New Orleans, La., for appellees.
    Before HUTCHESON, GEWIN, and BELL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

The issues here presented had the careful consideration of the District Court. The findings of fact and conclusions of law set out in the opinion of that court are amply supported, and no prejudicial error otherwise appears. Thus it is that the judgment appealed from should be and is

Affirmed. 
      
      . United States Use and Benefit of Goodman v. R. P. Farnsworth & Co., Inc., D.C., 218 F.Supp. 791.