Case ID: ga-app_36/html/0296-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

17742.
    Eason v. The State.
    Decided January 11, 1927.
    Larceny of cotton; from city court of Baxley — Judge Speer. September 14, 1926.
    
      James R. Thomas & Son, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Wade H. Watson, solicitor, contra.
    Criminal Law, 17 C. J. p. 255, n. 53.
   Broyles, C. J.

1. In the light of the facts of the case and the entire charge of the court, the excerpts from the charge, excepted to, were not error for any reason assigned. The chai’ge was full and fair and correctly presented to the jury the issues in the case and the appropriate law thereon.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.