Case ID: ri_20/html/0552-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George E. Vernon, Executor, et al. vs. Gardiner B. Reynolds.
    NEWPORT
    JUNE 1, 1898.
    Present: Matteson, O. J.. Stiness and Tillingliast, JJ.
    When the persons interested in the subject-matter of a suit in equity are numerous, a bill may be hied by one or more complainants in his or their behalf, and in behalf of all others interested who may come in and take on themselves the XJrosecution of the suit.
    Bill in Equity for an accounting and discovery.
    Heard on demurrer to the bill averring that all persons interested had not been made parties to the suit.
   Per Curiam.

Though the general rule is that all persons interested in the subject-matter of the suit should be made parties, an exception is allowed where the parties are numerous. In such case a bill may be filed by one or more complainants in his or their behalf, and in behalf of all others interested who may come in and take on themselves the prosecution of the suit. 1 Dan. Ch. Pr., 6 Am. ed. *p. 216, note 6; Adams Eq. 5 Am. Ed. *pp. 320-21, and note 1; Story Eq. PI. & Pr., 10 ed. § 97. The bill in the present case comes within this exception. Our opinion is, therefore, that it is sufficient, and that the plea of want of parties should be overruled.

Charles Acton Ives, for complainants.

Samuel B. Honey, for respondent.