Case ID: cust-ct_5/html/0433-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Opinion by Oliver, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 44958.
    Protests 784102-G, etc., of Wm. Shaland (New York).
   Opinion by Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel tin kazoos the same as those the subject of Abstract 32264 were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 397 as claimed, and uninflated rubber balls or so-called beach balls the same as those the subject of Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48231) and United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1502.