Case ID: f-appx_124/html/0821-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Aissatou BARRY, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 04-2077.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 25, 2005.
    Decided: April 5, 2005.
    Danielle Beach-Oswald, Noto & Oswald, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Petitioner.
    Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney-General, James A. Hunolt, Senior Litigation Counsel, Wagner D. Jackson, Jr., Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Aissatou Barry, a native and citizen of Guinea, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming and adopting the immigration judge’s order denying her motion to reconsider. Because we find the immigration judge did not abuse her discretion denying the motion to reconsider, we deny the petition for review. Stewart v. INS, 181 F.3d 587, 595 (4th Cir.1999). We further find we have no jurisdiction to review the immigration judge’s order denying Barry’s applications for asylum, withholding from removal and withholding under the Convention Against Torture. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d) (2000); Asika v. Ashcroft, 362 F.3d 264, 267 n. 3 (4th Cir.2004), cert. denied, — U.S. — , 125 S.Ct. 861, 160 L.Ed.2d 769 (2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED