Case ID: kan_21/html/0679-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Peter Clippenger v. Hiram C. Hastings.
    At the April Term, 1878, of the Nemaha district court, Hastings had judgment against Clippenger, who brings the case here for review.
    
      Joseph Sharpe, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Simon Conwell, for defendant in error.
   Per Curiam:

Prior decisions of this court dispose of every substantial question in this case, as follows: Turner v. Hale, 8 Kas. 38, on the question whether the findings are supported by the evidence; Marshall v. Shibley, 11 Kas. 114, on the admissibility of the record of the deed; Scoffins v. Grandstaff, 12 Kas. 467 and 471, on the character of the deed and covenants.

The judgment will be affirmed.