Case ID: nj-misc_7/html/0414-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WALTER M. BROWN, PLAINTIFF, v. MORRISEY & WALKER, INCORPORATED, DEFENDANT.
    Submitted January term, 1929
    Decided April 19, 1929.
    Before Justices Black, Campbell and Case.
    Eor the rule, Quinn, Parsons & Doremus.
    
    
      Contra, Ward Kremer.
    
   Pee Cueiam.

This suit was brought to recover one thousand dollars ($1,000), as a bonus or prize for the sale of real estate.' The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant obtained a rule to show cause and writes down nine.reasons for a new trial. Our reading of the testimony sent up with the rule to show cause and a consideration of the reasons filed thereunder lead us to the conclusion that the rule to show cause should be discharged. The rule is therefore discharged.