Case ID: ad_258/html/0843-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edward Everdyke, Respondent, v. Edward Esley and Floyd Esley, Appellants.
   Judgment and order reversed on the law and new trial granted, with costs to the appeEants to abide the event. Memorandum: The court erred in not permitting proof of the conviction of the plaintiff. (Schindler v. Royal Insurance Co., 258 N. Y. 310; Matter of Rechtschaffen, 278 id. 336.) AE concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in a civE action for assault. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.