Case ID: sw3d_4/html/0634-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Patrick J. LAWLER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 75824.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Nov. 9, 1999.
    Jane Berman, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT J. DOWD, Jr., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Patrick J. Lawler, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum for the parties, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).