Case ID: so2d_365/html/0176-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronald E. STOVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 78-551 through 78-555 and 78-564.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Nov. 15, 1978.
    
      Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, Bar-tow, and Karal B. Rushing, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgments and sentences of the trial court, but we agree with appellant that the phrase “at hard labor” in the sentence imposed for grand larceny is improper. Knight v. State, 349 So.2d 232 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Accordingly, we remand the case to the trial court for removal of the hard labor provision. Appellant need not be present for this correction.

GRIMES, C. J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.