Case ID: ohio-st-3d_59/html/0067-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cincinnati Bar Association v. Wang.
    [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Wang (1991), 59 Ohio St. 3d 67.]
    (No. 90-2534
    Submitted February 13, 1991
    Decided April 24, 1991.)
    
      
      Hollis A. Moore III and Richard J. Ruebel, for relator.
    
      John H. Burlew, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and in its recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.