Case ID: f-appx_262/html/0054-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roger Raymond GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-10131.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 3, 2007 .
    Filed Dec. 28, 2007.
    Glenn B. McCormick, Esq, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for PlaintiffAppellee.
    
      Carmen L. Fischer, Esq., Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Roger Raymond Gonzalez appeals from the sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Gonzalez contends that the sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release is unreasonable. We conclude that the district court did take into account the appropriate sentencing factors and that the ultimate sentence imposed is not unreasonable. See Gall v. United States, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); United States v. Plouffe, 445 F.3d 1126, 1131 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2314, 164 L.Ed.2d 832 (2006).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.