Case ID: nj-eq_83/html/0693-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mignonette M. Riker, respondent, v. Samuel McD. Riker, appellant.
    [Submitted July 6th, 1914.
    Decided October 16th, 1914.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Howell, whose opinion is reported ante p. 198.
    
    
      Mr. Ghauncey G. Farleer, for the respondent.
    
      Messrs. Oonlt & Smith, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion hied in the conn below by Vice-Chancellor Howell.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justioe, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker. Bergen, Minuten, Xalisci-i, Black, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Heppenhetmer, Williams — 13.

For reversal — Hone.