Case ID: sd_60/html/0264-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PETERSON, Respondent, v. PETERSON, Appellant.
    (244 N. W. 320.)
    (File No. 7398.
    Opinion filed September 27, 1932.)
    
      I. B. Whiting, of Woonsocket, for Appellant.
    
      R. B. Palmer, of Woonsocket, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon a former appeal in this case an opinion was rendered (56 S. D. 399, 228 N. W. 804, 805) whereby the cause was “remanded with directions to the trial court to enter judgment in conformity to this- opinion.” A subsequent judgment was entered by the trial court, and this is an attempted appeal from that judgment.

We refrain from in any way passing" upon the question of whether an appeal is the proper procedure to present the questions involved to this court. However, from the record as made, it is so apparent to us that the subsequent decree of the trial judge is in conformity to the mandate of this court in its former opinion that without further discussion the judgment as now entered is affirmed.

CAMPBELL, P. J., and HOLLEY, ROBERTS, WARREN, and RUDOLPH, JJ., concur.