Case ID: so2d_836/html/0009-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WEIMER, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Danny SANCHEZ v. GEORGIA GULF CORPORATION, et al.
    No. 2002-CC-2198.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Nov. 27, 2002.
   In re Georgia Gulf Corporation et al.;-Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Iberville, 18th Judicial District Court, Div. A, No. 54,227; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2002 CW 0904.

Writ granted. This matter is remanded to the court of appeal for briefing, argument and opinion to address the relationship between the drug testing requirements set forth in La. R.S. 49:1001 et seq. and the employment at-will doctrine.

WEIMER, J., concurs with reasons.

WEIMER, J.,

concurring.

I concur in the writ grant.

In denying the writ, the court of appeal alluded to this court’s opinion in Independent Fire Insurance Co. v. Sunbeam Corp., 99-2181 (La.2/29/00), 755 So.2d 226, which dealt with expert affidavits. Apparently, the court felt summary judgment was inappropriate because Georgia Gulf did not present an expert affidavit to counter plaintiffs expert affidavit regarding the accuracy of the drug testing. However, it is clear that there is no factual dispute concerning the validity , of the drug testing because Georgia Gulf conceded it did not follow the statutory provisions. Quite simply, Georgia Gulf takes the position that even if the test was inaccurate, it had the power to terminate plaintiff at will. Thus, the question of whether the test was accurate or not is not an issue of fact that would preclude the consideration of a motion for summary judgement.