Case ID: ny-st-rep_46/html/0961-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The Sixth Avenue R. R. Co., Resp’t, v. The Metropolitan El. R. Co. et al., App’lts.
    Appeal from judgment of special term.
    
      E. C. James, for app’lts; J. E. Burrill, for resp’t.
   Per Curiam.

Upon examining the brief of the counsel for the appellants in this case we do not find any questions of law raised which have not been previously considered and disposed of by this court, and, therefore, it is not necessary to reconsider them upon this appeal.

Upon the questions of fact involved it does not appear that the learned judge below has committed any errors which would justify this court in reversing the judgment.

The judgment should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

Van Brunt, P. J., O’Brien and Ingraham, JJ., concur.