Case ID: f-appx_637/html/0053-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

TRADEWINDS AIRLINES INC., Coreolis Holdings, Inc., Tradewinds Holdings, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. George SOROS, Purnendu Chatterjee, Defendants-Appellees.
    Nos. 15-1381-CV, 15-1366-CV.
    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    March 10, 2016.
    
      Cory S. Buland (William C. Carmody & Shawn J. Rabin, on the brief), Susman Godfrey LLP, New York, NY, for Trade-Winds Airlines Inc., Ellen R. Werther (Bruce J. Ressler, on the brief), Ressler & Ressler, New York, NY, for Coreolis Holdings, Inc., & TradeWinds Holdings, Inc., for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    Martin B. Klotz, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, New York, NY, for George Soros, Raymond L. Fitzgerald & David J. McCarthy, Butler, Fitzgerald, Fiveson & McCarthy, P.C., New York, NY, for George Soros, Dustin F. Hecker, Poster-nak Blankstein & Lund LLP, Boston, MA, for Purnendu Chatterjee, Kirstin T. Roy, Morrison Cohen LLP, New York, NY, for Purnendu Chatterjee, for Defendants-Ap-pellees.
    PRESENT: JOSÉ A. CABRANES, DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON and GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judges.
   SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from the District Court’s March 31, 2015 grant of summary judgment to defendants-appel-lees. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.

“This Court reviews a grant of summary judgment by the district court de novo.” Lamence + Mem’l Hosp. v. Burwell, 812 F.3d 257, 264 (2d Cir.2016). Upon de novo review of the record and relevant law, we affirm, substantially for the reasons stated by the District Court in its thorough March 31, 2015 opinion and order. See TradeWinds Airlines, Inc. v. Soros, 101 F.Supp.3d 270 (S.D.N.Y.2015).

CONCLUSION

We have considered all of plaintiffs-ap•pellants’ arguments on appeal and found them to be without merit. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the District Court’s March 31,2015 judgment.