Case ID: sw3d_143/html/0759-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hubert E. WHITNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 62531.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Sept. 21, 2004.
    Andrew A. Schroeder, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
    Deborah Daniels, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before SPINDEN, P.J., HOLLIGER and HARDWICK, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Hubert Whitney appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion following an eviden-tiary hearing. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment. The parties have been provided with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).