Case ID: f-appx_366/html/0467-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michel Andre DUKES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Detective M.R. RICHARDS, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 09-7711.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 18, 2009.
    Decided: Feb. 24, 2010.
    Michel Andre Dukes, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Christopher Hart, Sumrell, Sugg, Carmichael, Hicks & Hart, PA, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michel Andre Dukes appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant summary judgment on Dukes’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims against him. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Dukes v. Richards, No. 5:06-ct-03094-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.