Case ID: f-appx_234/html/0535-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Reynaldo PINEDA-CARLOS; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 07-70055.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted June 4, 2007.
    
    Filed June 12, 2007.
    Reynaldo Pineda-Carlos, Santa Ana, CA, pro se.
    Elsa Pineda-Martinez, Santa Ana, CA, pro se.
    Adad Hoazir Pineda, Santa Ana, CA, pro se.
    Adi Guadalupe Pineda, Santa Ana, CA, pro se.
    Tiare Itzayana Pineda, Santa Ana, CA, pro se.
    CAC-District, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, James A. Hunolt, Esq., Song Park, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before: LEAVY, RYMER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      
         This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Petitioners’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect this status.

Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.