Case ID: cust-ct_6/html/0806-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, Judge:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard Shipping Corp. v. United States
    No. 5134.
    Entry Nos. 722749, etc.
    Invoices dated Yokohama, Japan, August 1, 1935, etc.
    Certified August 2, 1935, etc.
    Entered at New York, August 30, 1935, etc.
    (Decided February 28, 1941)
    
      Jordan & KKngaman (J. L. Klingaman of counsel) for the plaintiff.
    
      Charles D. Lawrence, Acting Assistant Attorney General (Daniel I. Auster, special attorney), for the defendant.
   Tilson, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the issue herein and in United States v. Nippon Dry Goods Co., Reap. Dec. 5006, is the same, and that the appraised value of certain items, less any amount added by reason of the so-called Japanese consumption tax, represents the export value, and that there was no higher foreign value.

On the agreed facts I find and hold the proper dutiable export value of the rayon wearing apparel and the rayon footwear on the invoices covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser, less any amount added by reason of the so-called Japanese consumption tax. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.