Case ID: ad2d_302/html/0213-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Shlomo Saks, Appellant, v New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
    [753 NYS2d 377]
   Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered September 4, 2001, which denied plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion was properly denied on the ground that a complaint verified by counsel who does not claim personal knowledge of the facts is insufficient to support a default judgment (see Francisco v Soto, 286 AD2d 573 [2001]). Absent a complaint or affidavit sworn to by a person with personal knowledge of the facts, defendants were not required to show either a reasonable excuse or a meritorious defense (see Wood- son v Mendon Leasing Corp., 289 AD2d 158 [2001]). Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Buckley and Rosenberger, JJ.