Case ID: minn_158/html/0401-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHARLES KURTZ v. REPUBLIC STATE COMPANY AND ANOTHER.
    
    March 14, 1924.
    No. 23,657.
    Case followed:
    Action in replevin in the district court for Hennepin county for recovery of possession of one Oneida truck or for $1,590, its value, in case recovery could not he had. Defendant company’s motion to strike out certain portions of plaintiff’s reply and for judgment on the pleadings, was granted by Buffington, J. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, plaintiff appealed.
    Affirmed.
    
      Gilger & Babcock, for appellant.
    
      Gobb, Wheelwright, Hoke & Benson, for respondent.
    
      
       Reported in 197 N. W. 842.
    
   Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered against the plaintiff and in favor of the defendant, in the district court in Hennepin county on January 9, 1923, to the effect that the plaintiff take nothing by this action and that the defendant have and recover of the plaintiff its costs and disbursements. The case was submitted to this court largely upon the briefs in the case of the Republic State Co. v. Brown [immediately preceding this case], in which case the opinion of this court was filed concurrently herewith. The facts, so far as we are able to determine from the record before us, are substantially alike. The opinion in that case applies here and leads to affirmance of the judgment appealed from.

Affirmed.