Case ID: nj-super_4/html/0369-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JAMES CARONIA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF NEW JERSEY AND CITY OF ORANGE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
    Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
    Argued June 20, 1949
    Decided July 11, 1949.
    
      Before Judges McGeehan, Donges and Colie.
    
      Mr. Abraham L. Friedman (Messrs. Rothbard, Harris & Oxford, attorneys) argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant.
    
      Mr. John W. Griggs, Deputy Attorney General (Mr. Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney General, on the brief) argued the cause for Civil Service Commission of New Jersey.
    
      Mr. Edmond J. Dwyer argued the cause for City of Orange.
   Per Curiam.

Plaintiff appeals from the refusal of the

Civil Service Commission to grant him a hearing on his verified petition alleging that persons appointed by the City of Orange as special officers are performing services which he, as a chanceman of the police department of said city, is entitled to perform. The status of appellant as a chanceman is conceded. Caronia v. Caldwell, 123 N. J. L. 266 (E. & A., 1939); that the special officers are performing service as such appointees for which they are being paid by the City of Orange is, likewise, conceded. Appellant has not been engaged in any service for the municipality since January 1, 1949. The special officers have been on the city payroll for service performed during the period when appellant was not so engaged.

The record before us is meagre and, it is alleged, does not disclose the entire situation and that the Civil Service Commission’s refusal to grant appellant a hearing deprived him of his opportunity to show that his civil service rights were being violated^

The right of the municipality to appoint special officers is not challenged. The question for determination is as to whether the designated special officers are rendering public service that should be performed by chancemen and not by special officers.

We are of opinion that the Civil Service Commission should hear the matter and afford the parties an opportuinty to submit proof of the existing situation. To that end, the cause is remanded to the Civil Service Commission for hearing and determination on the merits.