Case ID: so2d_210/html/0448-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. DREW, Justice PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Katherine HEADRICK, Petitioner, v. CYPRESS GARDENS CITRUS PRODUCTS, INC., Hardware Mutual Insurance Company, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
    No. 37062.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Feb. 28, 1968.
    On Rehearing May 22, 1968.
    J. Mason Wines, of Stanley, Durrance, Woods & Wines, Lakeland, for petitioner.
    V. Patton Kee, Lakeland, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing- date November 30, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fee filed by Petitioner is also denied.

CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

DREW, J., dissents with opinion.

DREW, Justice

(dissenting):

I would have argument. Deputy’s order is erroneous as a matter of law because he overlooks statutory definition of accident as including (since Bonnie Gray) “sudden or unexpected result

ON REHEARING GRANTED

PER CURIAM.

After oral argument on rehearing granted, we adhere to our order of February 28, 1968 denying the petition for writ of cer-tiorari.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., ROBERTS, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., and SPECTOR, District Court Judge, concur.