Case ID: njl_125/html/0507-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ANTHONY SASKEL, RECEIVER, APPELLANT, v. HARRY WEINBERGER, RESPONDENT.
    Submitted October 25, 1940
    Decided January 3, 1941.
    For the appellant, Nathan Baker.
    
    For the respondent, Edward Zubalsky.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THe Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Case, Donges, IIeher, Perskib, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.