Case ID: okla_111/html/0145-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "THOMPSON, C. By the Court:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WESTERN LAND SECURITIES CO. et al. v. OKLAHOMA FARM MORTG. CO. et al.
    No. 14336
    Opinion Filed May 19, 1925.
    Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Thomas A. Edwards, Assigned Judge.
    Action by the Western Land Securities Company against the Oklahoma Farm Mortgage Company. Judgment for defendants and plaintiffs appeal.
    Affirmed.
    John N. Myers and Geo. A. Fitzsimmons, for plaintiffs in error.
    H. W. Harris and Burford, Miley, Hoffman & Burford, for defendants in error.
   Opinion by

THOMPSON, C.

This action was commenced in the district court of Oklahoma county, Okla., on the 17th day of October, 1921, toy the Western Land Se-, eurities Company, a corporation, et al., plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, against the Oklahoma Farm Mortgage Company, a corporation, et al., defendants in error, defendants below, to enforce the right to redeem lots 9 and 10, in block 1, in Offield’s addition. to Oklahoma ‘City, held by defendants in error by virtue of a foreclosure mortgage sale, and for an accounting for the rents and profits from said property while in possession of the defendants in error and for title after redemption.

This cause was submitted in oral argument and briefs by counsel with cause No. 13667, and it was admitted that the issues made up by the pleadings and the decisive facts in this case are the same as in the above numbered ease, just decided by this court (111 Okla. 138), except in the names of the defendants in error and the numbers of the .lots. Upon said issues, facts and the legal propositions applicable, the decision in the instant case must follow the decision in the above ease, and the opinion in the above case is adopted as the opinion in this ease, and the syllabus of that case is also adopted, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

By the Court:

It is so ordered.