Case ID: ohio-st-3d_62/html/0428-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State, ex rel. McCarty, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as State, ex rel. McCarty, v. Indus. Comm. (1992), 62 Ohio St.3d 428.]
    (No. 90-1895
    Submitted November 5, 1991
    Decided February 5, 1992.)
    
      
      Pencheff, King, Forman & Sullivan Co., L.P.A., and Richard J. Forman, for appellant.
    
      Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, Michael L. Squillace and Gerald H. Waterman, for appellee Industrial Commission.
   Per Curiam.

The commission’s boilerplate recitation of nonmedical disability factors does not satisfy the evidentiary requirements of Noll, supra. Pursuant to Noll we hereby affirm the judgment of the court of appeals which directed the commission to issue an order that complies with the directives set forth in that decision.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.