Case ID: or-app_78/html/0319-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Submitted on record and briefs February 27,
    reversed April 2, 1986
    KENNEDY, KING & ZIMMER, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Respondent.
    
    (85-T-21; A36288)
    715 P2d 1129
    George W. McKallip, Jr. and Kennedy, King & Zimmer, Portland, filed the brief for petitioner.
    Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, and Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
    Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Petitioner, a partnership of lawyers, seeks judicial review of the referee’s decision holding that it is not entitled to succeed to the experience rating of its predecessor partnership after one of the partners withdrew from the partnership. The Employment Division concedes that petitioner is the successor in interest and that the referee’s decision should be reversed.

Reversed.