Case ID: so2d_557/html/0587-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Barry STEPHENSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 88-2339.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Sept. 27, 1989.
    On Motion for Rehearing Nov. 22, 1989.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Phyllis Malinski, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, LETTS and POLEN, JJ., concur.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted. However, we affirm the judgment and sentences imposed in all respects and reject all of appellant’s points on appeal, including his challenge to the constitutionality of section 893.13(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1987). State v. Burch, 545 So.2d 279 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

The mandate of this court is stayed pending disposition of Burch v. State, 558 So.2d 1 (Fla.1990), by the Supreme Court of Florida.

DOWNEY, LETTS and POLEN, JJ., concur.