Case ID: kan_73/html/0793-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Art Volle et al. v. Patrick Cook et ux.
    
    No. 14,325.
    (83 Pac. 1116.)
    Error from Marshall district court; Sam Kimble, judge.
    Opinion filed March 10, 1906.
    Affirmed.
    
      R. P. Evans, and W. S. Glass, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      W. W. Redmond, for defendants in error.
   Per Curiam:

The action of the district court from which this proceeding in error arises related to a boundary which it was claimed had been fixed by parol and acquiesced in so as to bind the parties and their subsequent grantees. The only question is if the evidence supports the judgment of the trial court. A careful canvass of the record leads to the conclusion that the evidence is sufficient for that purpose, and the judgment is affirmed.