Case ID: njl_88/html/0729-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOHN McNALLY, RESPONDENT, v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Argued November 26, 1915
    Decided March 6, 1916.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 87 N. J. L. 455.
    For the appellant, Walter L. Glenney.
    
    For the respondent, Richard Doherty.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kaliseh in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chief Justice, Gabeison, Teenchabd, Beegen, Mintubn, Black, Teehune, Heppeftiieimek, Williams, Tayloe, JJ. 10.

For reversal—None.