Case ID: f-appx_463/html/0005-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marshall REEDOM, Jr., Appellant v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Appellee.
    No. 11-1234.
    United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
    April 11, 2012.
    
      Marshall Reedom, Jr., Fort Worth, TX-, pro se.
    Patricia M. Bowman, Trial, Tamara Wenda Ashford, Deputy Assistant, Bruce R. Ellisen, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
    BEFORE: HENDERSON, TATEL, and BROWN, Circuit Judges.
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States Tax Court and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(3). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the United States Tax Court’s decision dismissing appellant’s petition for lack of jurisdiction be affirmed. Although appellant appears to dispute a notice of determination concerning collection action, he has not produced any such notice that would allow him to invoke the Tax Court’s jurisdiction.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.