Case ID: sw2d_941/html/0709-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael K. PUTNAM, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. David T. DUNCAN, M.D., et al., Defendants/Respondents.
    No. 70074.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Feb. 25, 1997.
    Rehearing Denied March 31, 1997.
    Michael J. McDonnell, St. Louis, for plaintiff/appellant.
    Theodore G. Pashos, St. Louis, for defendants/respondents.
    Before RHODES RUSSELL, P. J., and PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael K. Putnam appeals from a jury verdict in favor of defendant, David T. Duncan, M.D., in a medical malpractice action involving the death of his wife, Karen Putnam. We affirm.

An extended opinion would serve no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).