Case ID: njl_97/html/0576-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CATHERINE SAFNER, APPELLANT, v. HARRY GOLLIN ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Submitted March 27, 1922
    Decided June 19, 1922.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 96 N. J. L. 431.
    For the appellant, Weinberg ,& Weinberg and Lazarus & Brenner.
    
    For the respondents, Runyon & Autenreith.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Katzenbach in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, CHiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, White, Heppenheimbr, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yan Buskikk, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.