Case ID: ga-app_27/html/0095-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Hill, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

12144.
    Heaton v. Brock.
    Decided May 14, 1921.
   Hill, J.

This was a horse-swap ease, and the action was based’ upon the failure of warranty of title. The motion for a new trial, filed by the defendant, was upon the general grounds. While the evidence was highly conflicting, there was some evidence -to support the verdict for the plaintiff:; and the judgment refusing to grant a new trial is therefore affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Complaint; from Carroll superior court •— Judge Terrell. December 23, 1921.

Boykin & Boykin, for plaintiff in error.

Smith & Smith, contra.