Case ID: okla-crim_57/html/0219-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHAS. C. DIAMOND v. STATE.
    No. A-8810.
    June 7, 1935.
    Rehearing Denied June 28, 1935.
    (46 Pac. [2d] 918.)
    Orr & Woodford, for plaintiff in error.,
    J. Berry King, Atty. Gen., and Smith C. Matson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.. ■
   PER CURIAM.

This is a companion case to- No. A-8809, 57 Okla. Cr. 214, 46 Pac. (2d) 966, just decided, involving the same defendant and the same charge except for a different transaction. The same questions are raised, and plaintiff in error’s brief differing from that filed in A-8809 only in referring to page numbers of the record; the state’s brief setting, up no additional matter and referring to its former brief.

Under the rule there laid down, the case is affirmed.