Case ID: tex-crim_100/html/0231-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MORROW, Presiding Judge. —", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

C. R. Crawford v. The State.
    No. 9091.
    Delivered May 20, 1925.
    Driving Auto Intoxicated — Affirmed.
    No statement of facts nor bills of exception appearing in the record, the cause is affirmed.
    Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County. Tried below before the Hon. Chas. A. Pippen, Judge.
    Appeal from a conviction of driving an automobile upon the streets of an incorporated city while intoxicated; penalty, ninety days in the county jail.
    No brief filed by appellant.
    
      Shelby S. Cox, District Attorney, Tom Garrard, State’s Attorney, and Grover C. Morris, Assistant State's Attorney, for the State.
   MORROW, Presiding Judge. —

The offense is the driving of an automobile upon the streets of an incorporated city while under the influence of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the county jail for a period of ninety days.

The indictment is not dissimilar from that in Scoggins v. State, 266 S. W. Rep. 513.

The facts are not before this court; neither are the complaints of the rulings of the trial court brought forward by bills of exception. We have not perceived or been referred to anything which demands or authorizes a reversal of the judgment. It is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.