Case ID: so2d_563/html/0215-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David MUNGER, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. CALIFORNIA FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and Richard T. Coley and Susan L. Coley, Husband and Wife, Appellees.
    No. 89-3451.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    July 3, 1990.
    Joanne R. Day and Fred F. Harris, Jr., of Roberts, Baggett, LaFace & Richard, Tallahassee, for appellant/cross-appellee.
    Charles A. Costin of Costin and Costin, Port St. Joe, for appellee/cross-appellant Cal. Federal Sav. and Loan Ass’n.
    No appearance for appellees Richard T. Coley and Susan L. Coley.
   PER CURIAM.

We find that it was not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to set aside the mortgage foreclosure sale. See Maule Industries, Inc. v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co., 91 So.2d 307 (Fla.1956); Surratt v. Fleming, 322 So.2d 39 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), cert. denied, 336 So.2d 600 (Fla.1976); Rosen v. Hunter, 224 So.2d 371 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969).

Because it is not ripe for judicial review, ■ we do not address the attorney’s fee issue raised in appellee’s cross appeal. See City of Tampa v. Fein, 438 So.2d 442 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), receded from on other grounds, Crittenden Orange Blossom Fruit v. Stone, 492 So.2d 1106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, NIMMONS and ALLEN, JJ., concur.