Case ID: ad3d_52/html/0412-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nicoll & Davis LLR, Respondent, v Isaac Ainetchi et al., Appellants.
    [859 NYS2d 368]
   Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith J. Gische, J.), entered April 26, 2007, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff law firm’s failure to comply with the rules on retainer agreements (22 NYCRR 1215.1) does not preclude it from suing to recover legal fees for services provided (see Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v Ganea, 41 AD3d 54 [2007]). Concur—Tom, J.P, Gonzalez, Buckley and Catterson, JJ. [See 2007 NY Slip Op 30942(U).]