Case ID: njl_109/html/0394-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ALBERT GRANOWITZ, RESPONDENT, v. HAY FOUNDRY AND IRON WORKS, APPELLANT.
    Argued May 23, 1932 —
    Decided October 17, 1932.
    For the respondent, Samuel Greenstone.
    
    For the appellant, Heine & Laird.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion died in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Teenchakd, Lloyd, Bodustb, Donges, Beogan, Yan Btjskiek, Kays, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.