Case ID: f2d_443/html/1180-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

B-E-C-K McLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES, Petitioner and Appellee, v. The RENEGOTIATION BOARD, Appellant.
    No. 24661.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    July 7, 1971.
    James H. Prentice (argued), Special Litigation Atty., L. Patrick Gray, III, Washington, D. C., for appellant.
    Simon Wampold (argued), Josef Diamond, Seattle, Wash., for appellee.
    Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and VON DER HEYDT, District Judge.
   PER CURIAM:

We are unable to find either errors of law by the Tax Court or that the findings of fact are arbitrary or capricious.

The case is affirmed on the opinion of the Tax Court, TC Memo 1969-15; see 1169,015 P-H Memo TC.