Case ID: misc_167/html/0127-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George B. Raymond, Respondent, v. George F. Davy, Appellant.
    
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    June 17, 1937.
    
      L. T. Fetzer, for the appellant.
    
      Morrison & Lynn [Charles Roden of counsel], for the respondent.
    
      
      Affg. 160 Misc. 388.
    
   Per Curiam.

While the form of the answer is unimportant on a motion for summary judgment, we think the affidavits justify the conclusion that the answer was sham.

Order and judgment affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

All concur. Present — Lydon, Levy and Frankenthaler, JJ.