Case ID: wis-2d_73/html/0337-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

State, Respondent, v. Kline, Appellant.
    
    
      No. 75-142-CR.
    
    
      Argued May 5, 1976.
    Decided June 30, 1976.
    
    (Also reported in 243 N. W. 2d 519.)
    For the appellant there were briefs and oral argument by James A. Hanley of Milwaukee.
    For the respondent the cause was argued by Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.
    
      
       Motion for rehearing denied, without costs, on October 19, 1976,
    
   Per Curiam.

The court is equally divided on the question of whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, Mr. Chief Justice Beilfuss, Mr. Justice Hef-fernan, and Mr. Justice Day being of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed, and Mr. Justice Han-ley, Mr. Justice Connor T. Hansen, and Mr. Justice Robert W. Hansen being of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed. The judgment appealed from is affirmed under the rule.

Judgment affirmed.