Case ID: so2d_453/html/0453-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. DELL, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

KIRSCH HOLDING COMPANY, Some Other Place, Inc., Stanley Kirsch and Ramblewood Associates, Inc., Petitioners, v. G.C.L. DEVELOPMENT CORP. and Thomas Erling, Respondents.
    No. 84-896.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    July 11, 1984.
    Rehearing Denied Aug. 14, 1984.
    Joel D. Kenwood of Heeg, Kenwood & Stone, P.A., Boca Raton, for petitioners.
    Douglas E. Thompson of Farish, Farish & Romani, West Palm Beach, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied. Lindsey v. Sherman, 402 So.2d 1349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

DOWNEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

DELL, J. concurs with opinion.

DELL, Judge,

concurring:

I concur with the majority’s denial of certiorari because the petitioner has an adequate remedy by appeal. However, in my opinion, the trial judge’s order directing this matter to be tried by a special master constitutes a denial of petitioner’s right to trial by jury, and therefore is a departure from the essential requirements of law. See, Spring v. Ronel Refining, Inc., 421 So.2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).