Case ID: f2d_436/html/1379-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Miles RAMSEY, Appellant.
    No. 26245.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Feb. 5, 1971.
    Michael Hegner (argued), San Diego, Cal., for appellant.
    Shelby R. Gott (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Harry Stewart, U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
    Before CHAMBERS, MURRAH  and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The Honorable Alfred P. Murrali, Senior Circuit Judge. Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

On the sufficiency of the evidence, the somewhat weak circumstances presented were shored up on knowledge, transportation and importation by Ramsey’s many inconsistent statements. Taken together, these statements could permit affirmative inferences.