Case ID: okla_63/html/0079-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "KANE, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FIRST STATE BANK OF WARNER v. PORTER.
    No. 8505
    Opinion Filed Jan. 30, 1917.
    (Syllabus by the Court.)
    Appeal and Error — Time for Appeal — Dismissal.
    Proceeding in error dismissed for the reason that same was not commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment complained of, as required by chapter 18, Sess. Daws 1910-11.
    Error from Superior Court, Muskogee Comity; H. C. Thurman, Judge.
    Action between the First State Bank of Warner and S. T. Porter. From the judgment, the former brings error.
    Dismissed.
    Ambrister & Ambrister, for plaintiff in error.
    Neff & Neff, for defendant in error.
   KANE, J.

This cause comes on to be heard upon a motion to dismiss the proceeding in error, upon the ground, among others, that the same was not commenced within the time provided by law. The record shows that the appeal was taken from a judgment rendered on the 12th day of February, 1916, and an order overruling the motion for new tidal therein, which was entered on the first day of April, 1916. No summons in error has been issued or served up to this time. It, therefore, appears that the proceeding in error was not commenced within the time required by chapter IS, Ress. Daws 1910-11, which provides:

“All proceedings for reversing, vacating and modifying judgments or final orders shall be commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of.”

The proceeding in error, therefore, must be dismissed upon the authority of Shelton v. Wallace, 63 Okla. 79, 162 PaC. 1092.

All the Justices concur.