Case ID: f-appx_361/html/0892-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jesus FLORES-MANCERA, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 09-30026.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 15, 2009.
    
    Filed Jan. 11, 2010.
    George Breitsameter, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Boise, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    John Robert Kormanik, Kormanik Hal-lara & Sneed LLP, Meridian, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jesus Flores-Mancera appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Flores-Mancera contends that the district court unreasonably applied the sentencing factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), thereby rendering his sentence substantively unreasonable. A review of the record demonstrates that the judge considered many of the § 3553 factors and that given the totality of the circumstances, Flores-Mancera’s sentence is reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.