Case ID: so2d_379/html/0135-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Estate of Bernard J. HERSKOWITZ, Deceased. Judith HERSKOWITZ, Appellant, v. Marvin HERSKOWITZ, Appellee.
    No. 78-1956.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 28, 1979.
    Rehearing Denied Feb. 4, 1980.
    Judith Herskowitz, in pro. per.
    Bartel & Shuford and Stanley Jay Bartel, Miami, for appellee.
    Before PEARSON and HUBBART, JJ., and CHAPPELL, BILL G., Associate Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

The order under review is affirmed upon a holding that (1) the trial court had jurisdiction to enter such order, James v. James, 64 So.2d 534, 536 (Fla.1953), and (2) the appellant waived for appellate purposes any objection thereto by (a) failing to object to, and, indeed, impliedly inviting the order appealed from in the trial court, Hawkins v. Perry, 146 Fla. 766, 1 So.2d 620 (1941); 3 Fla.Jur.2d “Appellate Review” 347 (1978), and (b) failing to appeal from, and complying with a prior order of the trial court which required the appellant to make substantially the same accounting as the order now under review. Hollywood, Inc. v. Clark, 153 Fla. 501, 15 So.2d 175 (1943); Herman A. Thomas, Inc. v. Sharpe, 309 So.2d 592 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).