Case ID: so2d_666/html/1058-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "GRIFFIN, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kilpatrick HOLTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 95-1891.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Feb. 2, 1996.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Anne Moorman Reeves, Assistant Public Defendant, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori E. Nelson, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appel-lee.
   GRIFFIN, Judge.

Appellant asserts, and the state agrees, that because the trial judge made contradictory oral pronouncements of sentence, remand is necessary in order to clarify the court’s intent. Although it appears that the judge may simply have misspoken in reiterating the sentence, in order to be certain, we remand to the lower court to clarify.

SENTENCE VACATED and REMANDED.

COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.