Case ID: f-appx_271/html/0568-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Claudia Annette Garcia MACIEL, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 05-72944.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 18, 2008.
    
    Filed March 24, 2008.
    Claudia Annette Garcia Maciel, Whittier, CA, pro se.
    District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Kristin A. Cabral, Nancy E. Friedman, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
    Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Claudia Annette Garcia Maciel, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review from a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. Maciel sought cancellation of removal based on hardship to her United States citizen children.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of petitioner’s motion to reopen, which alleged that her children would suffer hardship if she was removed. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 600 (9th Cir.2006) (concluding that this court lacks jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of motion to reopen for failure to establish a prima facie case if a prior adverse discretionary decision was made by the agency).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.