Case ID: f-appx_471/html/0125-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

B. MACON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E.I. DUPONT, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 11-2245.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 30, 2012.
    Decided: April 9, 2012.
    B. Macon, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher M. Michalik, Briton Katherine Nelson, McGuirewoods, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

B. Macon appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting DuPont’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Macon v. DuPont, No. 3:10-cv-00260-MHL, 2011 WL 4925083 (E.D.Va. Oct. 17, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006), the parties consented to have the case heard by a magistrate judge.