Case ID: ny_184/html/0591-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rudolph M. Haan, Appellant, v. Sarah E. Fox, Respondent.
    
      Haan v. Fox, 99 App. Div. 624, affirmed.
    (Argued March 16, 1906;
    decided April 3, 1906.)
    Appeal from a final judgment, entered March 15, 1905, jzpon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department affirming an interlocutory judgment of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
    
      S. liningston Samuels and Myron 11. Oppenheim for appellant.
    
      John A. Garner for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.