Case ID: so2d_759/html/0683-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edwin SCOTT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. SC95615.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    May 25, 2000.
    
      Kathleen M. Williams, Federal Public Defender, and Kenneth M. Swartz, Supervisory Assistant Federal Public Defender, Miami, Florida, for Petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorney General, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Scott v. State, 729 So.2d 533 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), which is a per curiam decision citing to Peart v. State, 705 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), quashed, 756 So.2d 42 (Fla.2000). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981). However, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted; thus, the case is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., dissents.