Case ID: njl_99/html/0525-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

S. L. DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL R. LADEN, APPELLANT.
    Submitted December 10, 1923
    Decided March 3, 1924.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion was reported sub nomine lieinfeld v. Laden, 98 N. J. L. 709.
    For the appellant, Harold Simandl.
    
    For the respondent, Benjamin M. Weinberg.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Black in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chan cellos, Chief Justice, Trengharb, Parker, Minturn, Campbell, Heppenheimee, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, JJ. 10.

For reversal — FTone.