Case ID: sw3d_280/html/0789-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carl MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 91273.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    April 14, 2009.
    Jo Ann Rotermund, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Chris Roster, Attorney General, Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carl Mitchell appeals the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15. We find that the motion court did not err in denying Mitchell’s motion.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment of the motion court under Rule 84.16(b).