Case ID: ad3d_91/html/0560-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Bianca R. and Another, Infants. Anne Marie S., Appellant; Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York, Respondent. In the Matter of Giselle S., Petitioner, and Carmelo R., Jr., Respondent, v Ann Marie S., Appellant.
    [937 NYS2d 56]
   The court properly considered the relevant factors when it determined that it was in the child’s best interests to award custody to the father and stepmother. The court found that they had provided the child with structure and a stable home environment, where she was thriving (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 172-173 [1982]). The 11-year old child’s preference to return to respondent mother, although a factor to be considered, is not dispositive (see Matter of Cresean W., 55 AD3d .420, 420-421 [2008]).

The court’s determination had a sound and substantial basis in the record. Although respondent appears to have made progress, she failed to demonstrate that she has overcome the problems which led to the child’s removal from her home. Neither respondent’s therapist nor the court-appointed expert recommend that the child be returned to respondent. Concur— Mazzarelli, J.E, Saxe, Catterson, Acosta and Román, JJ.