Case ID: misc_152/html/0293-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Barr & Shoulberg, Respondent, v. Yellow Taxi Corporation and Another, Appellants.
    
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    November 16, 1933.
    
      James A. Doherty, for the appellants.
    
      Maslon & Shapiro, for the respondent.
    
      
      Affg. 148 Misc. 855.
    
   Per Curiam.

While we do not think that the ordinance has any bearing on the case we consider that there was no error in ordering a new trial. Defendants, having received the goods from plaintiff and having without authority delivered them to a stranger, were liable as matter of law.

Order affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs to respondent to abide the event.

All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Callahan, JJ.