Case ID: ga_129/html/0246-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Eish, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Giddens et al. v. Giddens.
    Submitted June 28,
    Decided August 12, 1907.
    Application lor year’s support. Before Judge Little. Talbot superior court. November 3, 1906.
    
      J. J. Bull, for plaintiffs in error. Persons & Mcú-eUee, contra.
   Eish, C. J.

No complaint being made that any error of law was committed upon the trial, the only grounds of the motion for a new trial being that the verdict was contrary to law and to the evidence, and without evidence to support it; and the evidence, though conflicting, being amply sufficient to authorize the verdict, there was no abuse of discretion in. refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concw.