Case ID: cust-ct_1/html/0343-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dallinger, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 39025.
    Protests 389619-G, etc., of Ferdinand Bing & Co.’s Successors (New York).
   Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of lamps, bookends, boxes, vases, bottles, sugars, inkstands, coupes, trays, atomizers, plates, photo frames, salts, gueridons, baskets, tantalus sets, liquor sets and glasses chiefly used'on the table, in the kitchen, or in the household for utilitarian purposes, or hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph ■339 was sustained on the authority of United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373).