Case ID: so2d_538/html/1390-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anthony T. STANLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 88-544.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 14, 1989.
    George T. Yoss, Arthur Joel Berger, Miami, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Debora J. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

None of the grounds asserted by the defendant for reversal of his conviction present either error or harm. See M.H. v. State, 538 So.2d 1389 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). We remand the cause, however, to the trial court for the purposes (a) of correcting the judgment so as accurately to reflect the offense of which the appellant was found guilty and (b) of making the required written findings in support of the determination that Stanley is an habitual offender. See Link v. State, 537 So.2d 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).