Case ID: f-appx_204/html/0265-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Christopher T. JAMES, Plaintiff— Appellant, v. State of NORTH CAROLINA; Rick Jackson, Defendants— Appellees.
    No. 06-7147.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 17, 2006.
    Decided: Oct. 23, 2006.
    Christopher T. James, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Christopher T. James appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on both his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and subsequent Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See James v. North Carolina, 3:06-cv-00220, 2006 WL 1431639, 2006 WL 1716406 (W.D.N.C. May 17, 2006 & June 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.