Case ID: f-appx_547/html/0997-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

OPTIMUM POWER SOLUTIONS LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Optimum Power Solutions LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sony Electronics, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. Optimum Power Solutions LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lenovo (United States), Inc., Defendant-Appellee. Optimum Power Solutions LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dell Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
    Nos. 2013-1277, 2013-1278, 2013-1279, 2013-1280.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    Dec. 12, 2013.
    Bryan Guy Harrison, Esq., Attorney Jeffrey T. Breloski, Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Paul Alexander, Senior Counsel, Arnold & Porter, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before DYK, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The judgments of non-infringement in favor of the defendant-appellees Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Electronics, Inc., Lenovo, Inc., and Dell, Inc. are affirmed. We base our decision solely on our agreement with the district court’s construction of the phrase “wherein the power control means supply power to said memory integrated circuit.” Under the parties’ stipulation, our agreement with this aspect of the district court’s claim construction is sufficient to support the non-infringement judgment. We do not reach any other issues raised on appeal.

AFFIRMED