Case ID: ad2d_112/html/0053-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Gary Knowle et al., Petitioners, v James B. Kane et al., Respondents, and Richard J. Arcara, Intervenor-Respondent.
   Application unanimously denied and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Mandamus, like prohibition, is an extraordinary remedy and it is not appropriate in this case (see, Matter of Legal Aid Socy. v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12,16; see also, Matter of Okereke v Kane, 98 AD2d 990). (Article 78.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, O’Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.