Case ID: f-appx_708/html/0638-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph SPRADLIN, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 17-11629 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    (January 10, 2018)
    Colin P. McDonell, U.S. Attorney Service — Middle District of Florida, U.S. At-tome/s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Rosemary Cakmis, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant
    Joseph Andrew Spradlin, Pro Se
    Before WILLIAM PRYOR, NEWSOM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Stephen J. Langs, appointed counsel for Joseph Spradlin in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Spradlin’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.