Case ID: ohio-st-3d_71/html/1482-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

95-76. No. 67094.
    Cohen v. United Serv. Auto. Assn.
    
      Cuyahoga County,
    
   This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On February 13, 1995, appellee filed a motion for extension of time to file a memorandum in response. Whereas there is no provision in the Supreme Court Rules of Practice permitting the filing of a motion for extension of time to file a memorandum in response, and S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(3)(B) prohibits the filing of requests for extension not permitted by the rules,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, effective February 22, 1995, that appellee’s motion for extension of time bé, and is hereby, stricken.