Case ID: so2d_212/html/0064-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George WYNHOFF, Appellant, v. Adna HUNTER and William Hunter, his wife, Appellees.
    No. 67-646.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    June 25, 1968.
    Rehearing Denied July 24, 1968.
    Butler, Swope & Manning, Miami Shores, for appellant.
    Norman F. Solomon, Miami, and Jeffrey Michael Cohen, Miami Beach, for appellees.
    Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We have examined the briefs and considered the arguments of counsel in the light of the record on appeal, and have reached the conclusion that there exists sufficient competent evidence to support the jury verdict of appellees. No reversible error having been shown, the judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed. See: Midstate Hauling Co. v. Fowler, Fla.1965, 176 So.2d 87; Maiborne v. Kuntz, Fla.1952, 56 So.2d 720; § 59.041, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; McCormick, Evidence, § 228, p. 464.