Case ID: f2d_368/html/0152-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dorman W. CHANDLER and W. Fred Dryden, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
    No. 22705.
    United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
    Oct. 27, 1966.
    Harold L. Murphy, Howe & Murphy, Tallapoosa, Ga., for appellants.
    Allen L. Chancey, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Charles L. Goodson, U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.
    Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and BROWN and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We have carefully considered the issue raised with respect to the alleged unlawful search of a truck which was found to be carrying parts of a still. Several subsidiary questions need not be reached by us in view of our determination that, without doubt, the search as conducted by the officers was legal.

The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.