Case ID: misc2d_15/html/0962-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bertha Rothman, Respondent, v. Max Skernick, Appellant.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York County,
    January 7, 1958.
    
      
      William S. O’Connor and George V. O’Haire for appellant.
    
      Noah Seedman for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Plaintiff failed to present any reason or excuse for her delay of more than two years after joinder of issue in bringing the cause on for trial. Under the circumstances here disclosed, it was an improper exercise of discretion to deny appellant’s motion to dismiss the action as against him for lack of prosecution. (Rothman v. Skernick & Morton Bros., N. Y. L. J., Oct. 28, 1957, p. 9, col. 3 and cases cited.)

The order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with

$10 costs and taxable disbursements, and motion granted.

Concur — Pette, Hart and Di Giovanna, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.