Case ID: so2d_875/html/0807-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Arlety MERCADO, Appellant, v. Bruce FITELL, P.A. and Tate Management, Inc., Appellees.
    No. 3D03-2036.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 30, 2004.
    Friedman & Friedman, and John S. Sel-igman, Coral Gables, for appellant.
    Blaxberg, Grayson, Kukoff & Segal, and I. Barry Blaxberg, and Ian J. Kukoff, Miami, for appellee.
    Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and SHEPHERD, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court=s order denying the appellant’s right to pursue a negligence claim against a court appointed receiver. Because the appellant filed this negligence complaint within the four year statute of limitations contained in Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (2004), the trial court=s ruling to the contrary constitutes obvious error and requires reversal. See Hardy Equip. Co., Inc. v. Travis Cosby & Assoc., Inc., 530 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Pezzi v. Brown, 697 So.2d 883 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

Reversed.