Case ID: f-appx_683/html/0855-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Daniel ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-15030 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    (March 31, 2017)
    
      David Charles Waterman, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, Kristen A. Fiore, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee
    Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL for Defendant-Appellant
    Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Stephen J. Langs, appointed counsel for Donald Daniel Robinson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Robinson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.