Case ID: njl_127/html/0605-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LESTER CLAYTON, RESPONDENT, v. MARY STOKES CLAYTON, EXRS., ETC., APPELLANT.
    Submitted October 31, 1941 —
    Decided January 9, 1942.
    For the respondent, Quinn & Doremus.
    
    For the appellant, Parsons, Labrecque & Borden.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Bodine, Hei-ier, Porter, Colie, Dear, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 9.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Case, Donges, Wells, JJ. 4.