Case ID: f-appx_268/html/0264-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re: Anthony FEURTADO, Petitioner.
    No. 07-7548.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 28, 2008.
    Decided: March 7, 2008.
    Anthony Feurtado, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Anthony Feurtado petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to reconsider the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) filed on August 2, 2006, and amended on August 14, 2006, and his motion to correct clerical error under Fed. R.Crim.P. 36. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Because the district court has now ruled on both motions, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.