Case ID: cust-ct_59/html/0902-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Beckworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Before the First Division,
    November 6, 1967
    No. P67/379.
    Brechner Bros. Import Corp. v. United States, protest 65/22471 (Boston).
   Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of ladies’ or women’s footwear which on the basis of later received information would have been classified as footwear in chief value of india rubber and not wholly or in chief value of any product of which any synthetic resin or resin-like substance is the chief binding agent, and not wholly or in chief value of any synthetic resin, and on the authority of Adorence Co., Inc. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 369, C.D. 2661), the' claim of the plaintiff was sustained.