Case ID: sw2d_895/html/0641-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Tommy E. REED, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. 66217.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    March 28, 1995.
    Frank A. Anzalone, Clayton, for appellant.
    Andrea Harbin, Asst. Pros. Atty., St. Louis County, Clayton, for respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by the court of the class A misdemeanor of harassment, § 565.090 RSMo Supp.1993. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. A written opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).