Case ID: or_50/html/0561-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Commissioner King.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued 22 October,
    decided 17 December, 1907.
    DOUGLAS COUNTY BANK v. BLOOMER.
    93 Pac. 141.
    From Douglas: James W. Hamilton, Judge.
    For appellant there was a brief and an oral argument by Mr. Albert Abraham.
    
    For respondent there was a brief over the names of' Mr. William IF. Cardwell and Mr. James 0. Watson, with an oral argument by Mr. Cardwell.
    
    Affirmed.
   Opinion by

Mr. Commissioner King.

This is an action by the Douglas County Bank against defendant to recover $300, with interest, alleged to be due plaintiff on a promissory note, in which the points involved are, in effect, the same as in Sutherlin v. Bloomer (decided on this date), 50 Or. 398 (93 Pac. 135), except as to the third error there urged.

The judgment of the trial court must accordingly be affirmed.

Affirmed.