Case ID: so3d_207/html/0379-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "COHEN, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Zachary N. LINVILLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D16-1807
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Opinion filed December 30, 2016
    Zachary N. Linville, Wewahitchka, pro se.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.
   COHEN, J.

The State properly concedes that Zachary N. Linville’s motion for return of personal property was legally sufficient. We agree and reverse and remand for further proceedings. See Bolden v. State, 875 So.2d 780, 782-83 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (noting that if motion for return of personal property is facially sufficient, trial court may order State to respond to motion or hold an evidentiary hearing).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.