Case ID: sw3d_77/html/0709-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Tina GORDON, a minor, by and through her next friend, Sophia MARTIN, and Dareisha Brandon, a minor, by and through her next friend, Sophia Martin, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 80464.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    June 18, 2002.
    
      Patricia A. Hageman, City Counselor, Edward J. Hanlon and Michael F. Stelzer, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Devereaux, Stokes, Nolan, Rutledge & Fernandez, P.C., Michael D. Stokes, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J. and MARY R. RUSSELL, J. and MARY K HOFF, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

City of St. Louis (Defendant) appeals from a judgment in the amount of $311,913.00 rendered against it in an action for personal injuries brought by Tina Gordon and Dareisha Brandon, minors, by and through their next friend, Sophia Martin, (Plaintiffs) arising out of the death of their mother, Anita Martin!

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).