Case ID: or_125/html/0250-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued April 11,
    affirmed April 17, 1928.
    M. E. BARR v. YAMHILL COUNTY.
    (266 Pac. 1119.)
    From Marion: Percy R. Kelly, Judge.
    Department 2.
    Affirmed.
    For appellant there was a brief over the name of Messrs. Carson, Carson <& Carson, with oral arguments by Mr. Wallace Carson and Mr. Earl A. Nott, District Attorney.
    For respondent there was a brief over the name of Messrs. Vinton é Toose and Mr. Eugene E. Marsh, with an oral argument by Mr. Walter L. Toose.
    
   PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered all of the questions raised by the appellant and we find no reversible error. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed. Affirmed.