Case ID: ny_175/html/0498-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bartholomew Devaney, Respondent, v. The DegnonMcLean Construction Company, Appellant.
    Reported below, 79 App. Div. 62.
    (Submitted June 1, 1903;
    decided June 5, 1903.)
    Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department entered January 26, 1903, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
    The motion was made upon the grounds that the record presents no question that can be reviewed by the Court of Appeals and that the order allowing said appeal was obtained without notice of the application therefor to the respondent’s attorney
    
      George W. Roderick for motion.
    
      Nadal, Smyth, Carérre & Trafford opposed.
   Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.