Case ID: ohio-law-abs_4/html/0753-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 957
    GORSKI v. GORSKI
    No. 20037.
    Supreme Court
    On motion to certify.
    Dock. Aug. 2, 1926;
    4 Abs. 525.
    997. REAL ESTATE — Can action to quiet title be maintained by one who was not in possession at its commencement, and can a decree in a divorce and alimony suit be attacked in a subsequent action to quiet title?
    Attorneys — C. J. Suffens and A. H. Martin for Plaintiff; F. T. Matia for defendant; all of Cleveland.
   _ The questions are (1) may an action to quiet title be maintained by one not in possession at the time it was instituted? (2) May a divorce and alimony decree, fixing rights to realty, be attacked in a subsequent action to quiet title?