Case ID: f3d_241/html/0842-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND, SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND, and Howard McDougall, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. KROGER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 99-2257, 99-3014.
    United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
    Argued Feb. 17, 2000.
    Decided Feb. 2, 2001.
    Before WOOD, Jr., COFFEY, RIPPLE, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

The court, on its own motion, corrects an error in the text of the original opinion. See Central States, Areas Pension Fund v. Kroger, 226 F.3d 903 (7th Cir.2000). On page 910 of the published opinion, column 2, line 6, the term “de novo” ought to read “deferentially.” As the remainder of the court’s discussion makes clear, the correct standard was applied in the opinion and this slip of the pen did not impact the court’s analysis or the result in the case.