Case ID: f-appx_192/html/0683-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Harold Henry FIELDS, Defendant— Appellant.
    No. 05-55812.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 24, 2006.
    
    Decided July 27, 2006.
    Becky S. Walker, Esq., Mark Aveis, Esq., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Harold Henry Fields, Atwater, CA, pro se.
    Before: ALARCÓN, HAWKINS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Harold Henry Fields appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, correct and/or set aside his sentence for bank robbery. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Fields has abandoned the sole issue certified on appeal, because he failed to raise it in his briefs to this court. See Williams v. Woodford, 384 F.3d 567, 585 n. 4 (9th Cir.2004).

To the extent that Fields raises issues not included in the certificate of appealability (“COA”), we construe such contentions as a motion to broaden the COA, and we deny the motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); 9th Cir. R. 22-l(e); Hiivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-1105 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition, is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.