Case ID: f-appx_529/html/0360-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WEST VIRGINIA CWP FUND, as carrier for Premium Energy, Inc., Petitioner, v. Herman PECK; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents.
    No. 12-2192.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted May 31, 2013.
    Decided June 19, 2013.
    Ashley M. Harman, Jeffrey R. Soukup, Jackson Kelly PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Petitioner. Joseph E. Wolfe, Ryan C. Gilligan, Wolfe, Williams, Rutherford & Reynolds, Norton, Virginia; M. Patricia Smith, Solicitor of Labor, Rae Ellen James, Associate Solicitor, Gary K. Stearman, Counsel for Appellate Litigation, Jonathan P. Rolfe, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
    Before NIEMEYER, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

West Virginia Coal Workers’ Pneumoco-niosis Fund seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2006). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Peck v. Premium Energy, Inc., No. 11-0698-BLA (B.R.B. July 31, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.