Case ID: f3d_686/html/1121-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard STENGEL; Mary Lou Stengel, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MEDTRONIC INCORPORATED, a foreign corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 10-17755.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    July 25, 2012.
    Thomas G. Cotter, Haralson Miller Pitt Feldman & McAnally, PLC, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    Michael Kevin Brown and Lisa Marie Baird, Reed Smith, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, and Timothy James Casey, Esquire, Litigation Counsel, Schmitt, Schneck, Smyth & Herrod PC, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellee.
   ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be dted as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Wardlaw, Murguia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote as to whether the case should be taken en banc.