Case ID: so2d_407/html/0389-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Luerain FRISON, Appellant, v. WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC., Appellee.
    No. 81-584.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 22, 1981.
    Kosdan & Pariser and Brian W. Pariser, Miami, for appellant.
    Vemis, Bowling, West, Montalto & Goodman and Stephen N. Montalto, Coconut Grove, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ, and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., (Ret.), Associate Judge.
   DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.

Directing a verdict for the defendant, Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., the trial judge declared that a dangerous condition would be created only if the glass bottles of Pine-Sol (a slippery liquid cleanser) were displayed on the defendant’s grocery store shelves so that more than fifty per cent of the three-to-four-inch base of the bottles overlapped the edges of the shelves. Under this restrictive view of “dangerous condition,” only store customers caught in an avalanche of Pine-Sol bottles falling to the floor as a result of imbalance and gravity could possibly recover for injuries. Since Mrs. Frison was admittedly not the victim of freely falling bottles, but instead, while reaching for a less accessible, smaller bottle of Pine-Sol, she apparently dislodged the larger bottles which were stacked so as to protrude an inch beyond the edges of the shelves, she was denied recovery by the trial court.

Winn-Dixie’s argument, here and below, that the bottles could not fall down by themselves is hardly a basis for a finding that, as a matter of law, the store was not negligent, even if the plaintiff herself was negligent. See Pittman v. Volusia County, 380 So.2d 1192 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Whether Winn-Dixie was negligent in shelving the glass bottles so that they precariously protruded an inch beyond the edges of the shelves is most assuredly a jury question. Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment entered upon the directed verdict in favor of Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. and remand the cause for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.