Case ID: neb_42/html/0303-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Ragan, C.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bretta Svanson v. City of Omaha.
    Filed October 16, 1894.
    No. 5387.
    Review: Sufficiency of Evidence. This case examined, and held that the verdict of the jury was supported by sufficient competent evidence, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
    Rehearing of case reported in 38 Neb., 550.
    
      B. G. Burbank and J. W. Roudebush, for plaintiff in error.
    
      W. J. Connell and E. J. Cornish, eontra.
    
   Ragan, C.

This is a rehearing of Svanson v. City of Omaha, 38 Neb., 550, where a sufficient statement of the facts will be found for a proper understanding of the matter in controversy. There is no question of law involved in the case. The finding of the jury is supported by sufficient competent evidence, and we cannot, therefore, disturb it. The case as reported in 38 Neb., 550, is overruled and the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.