Case ID: f-appx_361/html/0553-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-7515.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 14, 2010.
    Decided Jan. 21, 2010.
    Keith Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith Harris appeals a district court order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). The district court concluded Harris was not entitled to a reduction because after considering Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines, Harris’ range of imprisonment remained the same, the mandatory minimum sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Harris’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.