Case ID: f-appx_122/html/0644-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jackson MOORE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. NEW HANOVER COUNTY GOVERNMENT; County Commissioners; County Manager; Human Relations Commission; Carl A. Byrd; John Davis; Cynthia Stevens, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 04-2185.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 24, 2005.
    Decided: March 4, 2005.
    
      Jackson Moore, Appellant pro se.
    Edwin Holt Moore, III, New Hanover County Attorney’s Office, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Jackson Moore appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000) (“Title VII”); 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1985 (2000); and the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. New Hanover County Gov’t, No. CA-03-195-DEV (E.D.N.C. Aug. 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED 
      
       The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).