Case ID: misc_179/html/1061-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Theresa Duchini, Respondent, v. Adolph Duchini, Appellant.
    
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    December 29, 1931.
    
      Irving D. Lipkowitz for appellant.
    
      Sigmund Goldstein for respondent.
    
      
       Revg. 140 Misc. 656.
    
   Per Curiam.

Defendant having breached the separation agreement, the election of the plaintiff to terminate it by serving an answer asking for a separation in the divorce action precludes her from recovering any installments under the separation agreement. (Pinkus v. Pinkus, 230 App. Div. 791.)

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Lydon, Levy and Frankenthaler, JJ., concur.