Case ID: ohio-st-3d_61/html/0683-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cox et al., Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. Stolle Corporation, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.
    [Cite as Cox v. Stolle Corp. (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 683.]
    
      (No. 90-2264
    Submitted July 31, 1991
    Decided August 27, 1991.)
    
      McCarthy, Palmer, Volkema & Becker, Dennis M. McCarthy and William C. Becker; Hochman & Roach and James B. Hochman, for appellants and cross-appellees.
    
      William H. Anderson and John C. Greiner, for appellee and cross-appellant.
   The judgment of the court of appeals dismissing on the jurisdictional issue (see [1990], 56 Ohio App.3d 79, 564 N.E.2d 1135) is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court; the judgment of the court of appeals on the constitutional issue is affirmed for the reasons stated in Brady v. Safety-Kleen Corp. (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 624, 576 N.E.2d 722.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.