Case ID: or-app_91/html/0715-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted March 2,
    affirmed June 22, 1988
    In the Matter of the Compensation of Marshall R. Mann, Claimant. MANN, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION et al, Respondents.
    
    (WCB 86-06228, WCB 86-08885; CA A44301)
    756 P2d 76
    James L. Edmunson, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Karen M. Werner and Malagon & Moore, Eugene.
    Darrell E. Bewley, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
    Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Graber, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

In this workers’ compensation case, the issue is whether claimant’s receipt of benefits under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (LHWCA), 33 USC §§ 901 et seq, excludes him from coverage under ORS chapter 656, Oregon’s Workers’ Compensation Law. The Workers’ Compensation Board held that, under ORS 656.027(4), claimant is excluded from coverage. We affirm.

ORS 656.027(4) provides:

“All workers are subject to ORS [chapter 656] except those nonsubject workers described in the following subsections:
u* * * * *
“(4) A person for whom a rule of liability for injury or death arising out of and in the course of employment is provided by the laws of the United States.”

Because LHWCA, a “law[] of the United States,” provides coverage for claimant’s work-related disability, he is not a subject worker under ORS chapter 656. ORS 656.027(4).

Affirmed. 
      
       The parties do not dispute that claimant’s disability is compensable under LHWCA.