Case ID: ga_116/html/0424-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pish, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Almand v. Nash & Company.
    Argued October 7,
    Decided October 30, 1902.
    Complaint. Before Judge Russell. Gwinnett superior court. April 10, 1902.
    
      W. 0. Wilson, for plaintiff in error. Alonzo Field, contra.
   Pish, J.

The testimony objected to was properly admitted ; the evidence, while conflicting, was sufficient to support the verdict; and there was no abuse of discretion in overruling the motion for a new trial. 1

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.