Case ID: cust-ct_3/html/0460-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dallinger, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 42571.
    Protests 971619-G, etc., of E. Leitz, Inc., et al. (New York).
   Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

On the agreed facts the cameras and parts in question were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1551. United States v. Leitz (24 C. C. P. A. 139, T. D. 48622) and United States v. Zeiss (id. 145, T. D. 48624) followed.