Case ID: sw2d_861/html/0200-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kathleen P. COLLINGHAM, Respondent, v. David R. COLLINGHAM, Appellant.
    No. 63182.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Sept. 21, 1993.
    Ira A. Potter, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Allan F. Stewart, Clayton, for respondent.
    Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals the amount of child support and maintenance awarded in his dissolution decree. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears.

An opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm by written order. A memorandum for the parties’ use only has been prepared. Rule 84.16(b).

Judgment affirmed.