Case ID: ohio-law-abs_6/html/0359-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "VICKERY, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NEIGHBORS et v. THISTLE DOWN CO. et.
    Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist., Cuyahoga Co.
    Boyd, Cannon, Brooks & Wickham, Cleveland, for Neighbors.
    Geo. W. Spooner, Cleveland, for Thistle Down Co.
    529a. FINAL OEDEES — 1002. Beceiyers — 465. Error Proceedings.
    1. Order appointing receiver held final order.
    2. Order overruling motion to remove receiver, not final order.
    3. Petition in error filed more than 70 days after order appointing receiver, though within 70 days of order overruling motion to remove, not filed in time.
   VICKERY, J.

1. Order appointing receiver for corporation was final order to which petition in error may be prosecuted.

2. Order overruling motion to remove receiver is not an order affecting- substantial rights of parties to which error may be prosecuted.

3. Where receiver was appointed and court subsequently overruled motion to remove receiver, petition in error filed more than seventy days after order appointing receiver was entered by common pleas court, though within seventy days of order overruling motion to remove, was not filed in time.

(Levine, PJ., and Sullivan, J., concur.)

For reference to full opinion, see Omnibus Index, last page, this issue.