Case ID: sw3d_388/html/0601-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charlie HILL, Employee/Appellant, v. PARKWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 98542.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Dec. 18, 2012.
    John J. Ammann, St. Louis, MO, for Employee/Appellant.
    Parkway School District, Chesterfield, MO, Pro Se.
    Michael Eugene Cook Pritchett, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.
    Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charlie Hill appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying him unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission’s decision is supported by substantial and competent evidence. Berwin v. Lindenwood Female College, 205 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum' setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).