Case ID: so2d_596/html/0902-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sherman HOLLAND, Jr. v. B. G. STRICKLAND, et al.
    1900905.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    March 27, 1992.
    Ralph J. Bolen, Birmingham, for appellant.
    J. Frank Head of Wallace, Ellis, Fowler & Head, Columbiana, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

After a thorough review of the record, the exhibits, and the briefs filed in this case, we are unable to conclude that the trial judge erred in directing a verdict for the defendants. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court based on that verdict is affirmed. See Bailey v. Avera, 560 So.2d 1038 (Ala.1990); Watson v. McGee, 348 So.2d 461 (Ala.1977); Chicago, Mobile Development Co. v. G. C. Coggin Co., 259 Ala. 152, 66 So.2d 151 (1953); Watkins v. Roden Coal Co., 205 Ala. 367, 87 So. 565 (1921).

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and ALMON, ADAMS, STEAGALL and INGRAM, JJ., concur.