Case ID: f-appx_668/html/0038-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN RE: Julius NESBITT, Petitioner.
    No. 16-1190
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: August 1, 2016
    Decided: August 22, 2016
    Julius Nesbitt, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Julius Nesbitt petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court recently took significant action on Nesbitt’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED