Case ID: so2d_110/html/0015-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER. CURIAM, THORNAL, Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ed C. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION FOR COUNTY OF SUMTER, State of Florida, Appellee.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    March 25, 1959.
    Raymond, Wilson, Karl & Fink, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
    Askew, Wehle, Earle & Holley, St. Petersburg, for appellee.
   PER. CURIAM,

This Court, reserved .jurisdiction in its opinion filed October... 30th, 1957, Fla., 100 So.2d 403, to tax costs upon due application to this Court. Application has now been made .to this..Court .by appellant, supported by affidavit, to tax costs in said cause in the amount of $406.49 against the Board -of Public Instruction for the County of Sumter. The Court has examined the items set forth in the application and there being no objections to the correctness or taxability of any such items of costs by the appellee, it is, thereupon, •

. Ordered that the appellant Ed C. Wright do have and recover of and from the appellee Board of Public Instruction for the County of Sumter, State of Florida, a body corporate, the sum of $406.49.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, HOBSON, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

ROBERTS and THORNAL, JJ., concur in order.

TERRELL, C. J., dissents.

THORNAL, Justice

(concurring).

While I disagreed with the views of the majority in the original judgment I consider myself bound by it and therefore concur in this order.

ROBERTS, J., concurs.