Case ID: mo_28/html/0106-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Scott, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ballentine et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Pratt, Defendant in Error.
    1. Judgment affirmed.
    
      Error to Linn Circuit Court.
    
    
      Shackelford and Turner, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      E. B. Ewing, (attorney general,) for defendant in error.
   Scott, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The instructions have been examined, as.well those for the plaintiffs as that for the defendant. The instructions correctly stated the law of the case, and as there was contradictory evidence, it was for the jury to determine its credibility.

Affirmed;

Judge Richardson concurs. Judge Napton absent.