Case ID: so2d_957/html/0031-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carl Kenneth FRAZIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 5D06-1520.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    April 20, 2007.
    
      James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
    Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See San Martin v. State, 717 So.2d 462, 470-71 (noting evidentiary rulings cannot be disturbed absent abuse of discretion); Singleton v. State, 783 So.2d 970, 976 (Fla.2001) (holding that, where counsel did not raise below as grounds for objection the issue argued on appeal, the issue was not preserved for review).

GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.