Case ID: so2d_755/html/0180-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stephen J. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 2D99-1707.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 12, 2000.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Douglas Chanco, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Stephen J. Smith appeals the revocation of his probation. Because the evidence supports the trial judge’s finding as to the violation of condition 5, we affirm the revocation. The finding in the written order that Smith violated condition J must be stricken because the trial judge’s oral findings did not include a violation of that condition.

The order of revocation is affirmed, but the finding that Smith violated condition J is stricken.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and BLUE and STRINGER, JJ„ Concur.