Case ID: nj-eq_63/html/0804-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frederick Hemsley, complainant and appellant, v. The Marlborough Hotel Company, defendant and respondent.
    [Filed June 23d, 1902.]
    
      Mr. Samuel H. Grey, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Clarence L. Cole, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Reed filed in the court below. See 17 Dick. Ch. Rep. 164.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, G-arretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Adams, Vredbnburgh, Voorhees, Vroom—14.

For reversal—None.