Case ID: pa-super_34/html/0472-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Orlady, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Tenth National Bank of Philadelphia v. Smith Construction Company
    October 7, 1907 :
    (No. 2).
    Argued March 13, 1907.
    Appeal, No. 24, March T., 1907, by
    David F. Stauffer, from decree of C. P. York Co., April T., 1905, No. 1, sustaining exceptions to auditor’s report in case of The Tenth National Bank of Philadelphia v. The Smith Construction Company.
    Before Rice, P. J., Porter, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Head and Beaver, JJ.
    Reversed.
   Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

In The Tenth National Bank of Philadelphia (Fourth Street National Bank of Philadelphia, Appellant) v. The Smith Construction Company, 218 Pa. 581, decided by the Supreme Court on June 3,1907, the same question as is presented for our consideration in this appeal was disposed of, and following that decision for the reasons therein stated, the same order is made. The decree in this ease is reversed and the report of the auditor absolutely confirmed, the costs on this appeal to be paid by the appellee.