Case ID: nc_188/html/0829-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. K. RAY v. MRS. A. D. ROSS.
    (Filed 12 November, 1924.)
    Appeal by plaintiff from Sinclair, J., at March Term, 1924, of Durham.
    
      Brogden, Beade & Bryant for plaintiff.
    
    
      B. H. Sylces for defendant.
    
   Pee Cueiam.

This was an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit in the court below. From the evidence set out in the record, taken in a light most favorable to plaintiff, we think the case should have been submitted to a jury. The evidence excluded was competent.

¥e think the case is governed by the principle laid down in Taylor v. Lee, 187 N. C., p. 393.

For the reasons given, the judgment must be

Eeversed.