Case ID: sw3d_516/html/0454-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

A.T.A., Petitioner/Respondent, v. B.S.S., Respondent/Appellant.
    No. ED 104532
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    FILED: April 25, 2017
    Steven A. Waterkotte, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Henry M. Miller, Jr., William P. Grant, Clayton, MO, for Respondent.
    Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

B.S.S. appeals the judgment of the circuit court granting an Order of Protection against him in favor of A.T.A. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for then’ information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).