Case ID: f2d_555/html/1378-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Gabriel Francis ANTELOPE, Appellant.
    No. 74-2741.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    June 20, 1977.
    Allen V. Bowles, Moscow, Idaho, argued for appellant.
    Gabriel Francis Antelope, pro se.
    Marion J. Callister, U. S. Atty., Mikel H. Williams, Asst. U. S. Atty., D. Idaho, Boise, Idaho, argued for appellee.
    Before KILKENNY, CHOY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The facts leading up to the appellant’s trial and conviction are stated in our opinion, United States v. Antelope, 523 F.2d 400 (CA9 1975). That decision was reversed by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Antelope,-U.S.-, 97 S.Ct. 1395, 51 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977), and the cause remanded to us for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court opinion.

Inasmuch as the Supreme Court rejected appellant’s sole contention, the judgment of conviction must be affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.