Case ID: sw_294/html/0899-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "RANDOLPH, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WEIMHOLD v. HYDE.
    (No. 2830.)
    Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Amarillo.
    May 11, 1927.
    1. Partnership &wkey;o200 — Son under 14, claimed to be partner of defendant carrying on business under assumed name, held not necessary party.
    In suit against defendant trading under assumed name, defendant’s plea of nonjoinder of necessary parties because of failure to make son under 14 party held properly overruled, though son was claimed to be partner.
    2. Parent and child <&wkey;5(l) — Parent has right to services of minor child during minority.
    Parent has right to services of minor child during period of its minority, right being based upon doctrine of compensation resulting from liability to support child.
    3.Parent and child <&wkey;>5(l) — Father’s creditors may subject earnings of unemancipated minor to satisfaction of their claims.
    Until minor has been emancipated, minor’s earnings belong to father, and father’s creditors may subject them, to payment of their claims. . .
    4. Infants <i&wkey;9 — Emancipation of boy under 14 is not presumed.
    Emancipation of boy under 14 years of age cannot be presumed.
    5. Appeal and error <&wkey;731 (5) — Assignment that verdict is against evidence held too general.
    Assignment that verdict of jury is contrary to evidence helé too general for consideration on appeal.
    6. Witnesses <&wkey;345 (2) — Cross-examination as to whether witness was charged with making and cashing bad checks held improper.
    Cross-examination of witness as to whether he was not charged by complaint with making and cashing bad cheeks held improper for purpose of impeachment.
    7. Constitutional law <&wkey;34 — Constitutional provision giving lien for value of labor and materials held self-executing (Const, art. 16, § 37).
    Const, art. 16, § 37, providing lien for mechanics, artisans, and materialmen for value of labor and materials, held -self-executing.
    8. Mechanics’ liens <&wkey;288(l) — Where jury found existence of debt and- performance of labor, court could enter judgment foreclosing mechanic’s lien (Const, art. 16, § 37). .
    Where in suit to establish and foreclose mechanic’s lien under Const, art. 16, § 37, existence of debt was found by jury and fact of performance of labor, trial court could, as court of equity, enter judgment foreclosing lien.
    Appeal from Lamb County Court; E. N. Bur rus, Judge.
    Suit by Jack Hyde against. H. H. Weim-hold,- in which defendant interposed a cross-action. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
    Affirmed.
    J. E. Dryden, of Sudan, for appellant.
    John H. Wood, of Amherst, for appellee.
   RANDOLPH, J.

Appellee, as plaintiff, filed this suit in the county court of Lamb county to recover from appellant, as defendant, certain money alleged to be due him for his personal services, claiming a constitutional lien upon the equipment of the Sudan News, a newspaper published in Sudan, Lamb county, Tex., and praying for a foreclosure of such lien.

Defendant raised the question of nonjoin-der of necessary parties defendant, by sworn plea, setting up the fact that he had complied with the “assumed name” statute; that his son, who was under 14 years of age, was his partner in said enterprise; also pleading payment of the account sued on and a cross-action for debt owing him by plaintiff.

On trial before a jury tbe court rendered judgment in favor of tbe plaintiff for tbe sum claimed by bim, for a foreclosure of bis lien, and also against tbe defendant on bis plea of want of necessary parties and on bis cross-action for debt. It is from that judgment tbe appeal is taken.

Tbe defendant’s assignment of error, presenting tbe plea of nonjoinder of necessary parties because of tbe failure to make bis son, wbo was bis partner, a party, cannot be sustained. Tbe affidavit appellee filed witb tbe county clerk, that tbe assumed name. “Sudan News,” was used by tbe appellant and bis son as partners, rests upon the claim of such partnership witb a minor. Appellant accounts for bis son’s interest in tbe publication by testifying that the said son had paid for such interest witb money earned by bim from tbe sale of peanuts and pop corn.

Tbe parent has tbe right to tbe services of bis minor son, and such right rests primarily upon tbe doctrine of compensation. Tbe parent, being legally bound to support bis infant child, is held to be entitled to its services during minority. Texas, etc., Ry. Co. v. Morin, 66 Tex. 225, 18 S. W. 503; Fort Worth Street Ry Co. v. Witten, 74 Tex. 202, 204, 11 S. W. 1091.

Until tbe minor has been emancipated, iris earnings belong to bis father, and tbe creditors of tbe latter have tbe right to subject them and the property in which they are invested to tbe satisfaction of their claims. Harper v. Utsey (Tex. Civ. App.) 97 S. W. 509; Schuster v. Bauman Jewelry Co., 79 Tex. 179, 15 S. W. 259, 23 Am. St. Rep. 327. There is no evidence of any emancipation of tbe minor in this case, and, tbe boy being of such tender age, none can be presumed.

The assignment that tbe verdict of tbe jury is contrary to tbe evidence is top general for our consideration. This has been held so often that it is not necessary to cite authorities.

Tbe assignment charging error on tbe part of tbe trial court in refusing to require tbe plaintiff while on tbe witness stand to answer tbe question, “Is it not a. fact that you now stand charged by complaint in Lamb county witb the making and cashing of bad checks?” cannot be sustained. Tbe trial court ruled correctly in refusing to permit tbe witness to answer this question. Tbe alleged purpose of tbe evidence was to impeach the witness, and such testimony is not admissible for' that purpose, and was wholly immaterial to any issue in the case. M., K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Creason, 101 Tex. 335, 107 S. W. 527.

It was not necessary for tbe trial court to submit tbe issue as to whether or not tbe appellee' bad a lien on tbe equipment of tbe Sudan News. Beyond proof of tbe fact of tbe existence of the debt, which was found by tbe jury, and tbe fact of tbe labor having been performed, there was no way of submitting tbe question of constitutional lien to tbe jury. Tbe provision of the Constitution, article 16, § 37, is self-executing, and it was proper that tbe trial court, as a court of equity, should enter judgment, foreclosing such constitutional lien. Wichita Falls Sash & Door Co. v. Jackson (Tex. Civ. App.) 203 S. W. 100; City National Bank v. Laughlin (Tex. Civ. App.) 210 S. W. 617.

Having considered all (assignments and proiDositions, and finding no reversible error, we affirm tbe judgment of tbe trial court. 
      ©sjFor other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes