Case ID: f-appx_298/html/0673-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin C. WALLA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-30018.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 28, 2008.
    
    Filed Nov. 5, 2008.
    Richard A. Hosley, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, for PlaintiffAppellee.
    R. Hank Branom, Federal Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendant Appellant.
    Before: HAWKINS, RAWLINSON and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Kevin C. Walla appeals from the sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Walla contends that the district court erred by failing to address all of the relevant sentencing factors that must be considered pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) and by failing to give a specific reason for the term of supervised release imposed. Walla also contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. We conclude that the district court did not commit procedural error and that the sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc), cert. denied sub nom. Zavala v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 2491, 171 L.Ed.2d 780 (2008); United States v. Cope, 527 F.3d 944, 951-52 (9th Cir.2008).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.