Case ID: ala_278/html/0537-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. LAWSON, Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

179 So.2d 286
    Ex parte STATE of Alabama, ex rel. Richmond M. FLOWERS, Attorney General, v. Honorable T. Werth THAGARD, Circuit Judge.
    3 Div. 215.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Oct. 20, 1965.
    Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and Joe Breck Gantt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
    Arthur J. Hanes, Birmingham, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed in this cause having been argued and submitted and duly understood by the Court,

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the Petition be and the same is hereby denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON, GOODWYN and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.

LAWSON, Justice

(specially concurring).

The State of Alabama asks in this petition that we compel the Honorable T. Werth Thagard, by the issuance of a writ of mandamus, to sustain the State’s challenge of certain prospective jurors summoned to try the case of the State of Alabama against Collie Leroy Wilkins in the Circuit Court of Lowndes County.

The State insists that the extraordinary writ of mandamus should issue because the State could not appeal from a judgment of acquittal. But if we were to interrupt the trial of the Wilkins case to review by mandamus the rulings here under consideration we would establish a precedent which would in the future operate to impede the progress of all criminal trials while we reviewed by mandamus various and sundry rulings of trial courts during the progress of those trials.

The State has cited no case decided by this court or by any other court which sustains its position. We have found no such case.

GOODWYN, J., concurs in the views of LAWSON, J.