Case ID: ad_265/html/1022-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Claim of Gustave Schneider, Respondent, against Durst Manufacturing Company et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board et al., Respondents.
   The furnishing of the truss is a payment of compensation within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (Matter of Patti v. Knickerbocker Fireproofing Co., 280 N. Y. 609; Matter of Gabrielli v. City of New York, 258 App. Div. 1015, leave to appeal denied, 282 N. Y. 809.) Decision reopening the case and order directing the carrier to provide a truss affirmed with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Sehenck, JJ.