Case ID: ny_248/html/0647-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Henry D. Bulkley, Respondent, v. Rouken Glen, Inc., Appellant.
    
      Real -property — contract — sale — specific performance — action to compel specific performance of contract for sale of real property or for damages.
    
    
      Bulkley v. Rouken Glen, Inc., 222 App. Div. 570, affirmed.
    (Argued June 19, 1928;
    decided July 19, 1928.)
    Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered February 8, 1928, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to compel specific performance of a contract of sale by defendant to plaintiff of certain real property or for damages, it appearing that defendant could not convey an unincumbered title.
    
      Michael D. Reilly for appellant.
    
      Harold B. Elger for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ. Not sitting: Crane, J.