Case ID: f-appx_125/html/0100-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. John C. HETHERINGTON, Appellant.
    No. 04-2928.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 28, 2005.
    Decided: March 25, 2005.
    Henry Joseph Shea, III, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellee.
    John C. Hetherington, Taft, CA, pro se.
    Before MELLOY, MCMILLIAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

John Hetherington appeals from the order entered in the District Court for the District of Minnesota denying his motion for reconsideration of the order denying his Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33 motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, and his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) sentence-reduction motion. Because the notice of appeal is not timely as to the underlying order, this appeal raises only the question whether the district court abused its discretion in denying the motion for reconsideration. After careful consideration, we find there was no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.