Case ID: pa-super_212/html/0173-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Commonwealth v. Jones, Appellant.
    Argued March 21, 1968.
    Before Wright, P. J., Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, and Hannum, JJ.
    
      
      John J. Cannon, for appellant.
    
      Vram Redurian, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, with him Ralph B. D’lorio, Assistant District Attorney, William R. Toal, First Assistant District Attorney, and Stephen J. McEwen, Jr., District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
    March 21, 1968:
   Opinion

Per Curiam,

In the instant case, our Court granted leave to file this appeal nunc pro tunc. It appears, however, that post-trial motions have not been filed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Commonwealth v. Grillo, 208 Pa. Superior Ct. 444, 222 A. 2d 427 (1966). Accordingly, this case is remanded to the lower court to allow appellant to file post-trial motions nunc pro tunc. Should the said post-trial motions be dismissed, appellant shall have the right to appeal nunc pro tunc.