Case ID: ga-app_35/html/0245-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

17086.
    Powell v. The State.
    Criminal Law, 17 C. J. p. 87, n. 44; p. 271, n. 41.
    Decided April 14, 1926.
    Rehearing denied May 12, 1926.
    Conviction of driving automobile while drunk; from city court of Wrightsville—Judge Blount. December 5, 1935.
    
      J. L. Kent, for plaintiff in error.
    
      J. Roy Rowland, solicitor, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

1. The only special ground of the motion for a new trial is too indefinite to be considered. “Grounds of a motion for new trial should be complete within themselves.” Daniel v. Schwarzweiss, 144 Ga. 81 (1) (86 S. E. 239).

2. There was some evidence to support the verdict, the trial judge approved it, and, no error of law having been committed on the trial, this court is powerless to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.