Case ID: sw3d_461/html/0847-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lavaris W. ROGERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    ED 101729
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    
    Filed: May 12, 2015
    Greg Doty, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Dora A. Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lavaris Rogers appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Mo. R. Crim. P. 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2014).