Case ID: blume-sup-ct-trans_3/html/0412-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anonymous.
    Sept. Term 1819.
   Application was made for a continuance of this case to the next Term, but it was contended the affidavit did not contain sufficient matter to warrant the application; and after much dispute, the court decided that on motions for continuances the following causes should be shown by the Affidavit:

Ist That there is a material witness in the case.

ad That such witness is absent from the Territory.

3d That the party has used due diligence to obtain his attendance; and this must be determined by a subpoena taken out and returned non est.

4th That he expects to obtain his attendance at the next Term of the court.

5th That he expects to prove a credit, or something material by the witness.

6th That he is a competent witness,

and 7th That the application is not made for the purpose of delay. —