Case ID: or_26/html/0561-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[Decided November 19,1894.]
    SWANSON v. LEAVENS.
    [S. C. 40 Pac. 230.]
    Practice on Appeal—Rules op Court—Filing Abstract.—Where rule four of this court, (24 Or. 595,) requiring the filing of printed abstracts of the record is not complied with, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed on motion.
    Appeal from Multnomah.
    Action by Peter and Chas. Swanson against J. M. Leavens. Judgment for plaintiffs, from which defendant appealed, but failed to file a printed abstract of the record, or have the time for so doing extended. Respondents move to affirm the judgment.
    Affirmed.
    
      Mr. W. W. Page, for Appellant.
    
      Mr. G. A. Moore, for Respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment herein will be affirmed for failure to comply with rule four of this court, taking effect October first, eighteen hundred and ninety-four.

Affirmed.