Case ID: sw3d_520/html/0836-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NESIMOVIC, LLC, Appellant, v. Will LINDSEY and Andrea Lindsey, Respondents.
    No. ED 104482
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    FILED: June 27, 2017
    Jay L. Kanzler, Jr., 2001 S. Big Bend, St. Louis, MO 63117, for appellant.
    Will and Andrea Lindsay, Pro Se, 4343 Osceola, St. Louis, MO 63116, pro se.
    Before James M. Dowd, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Nesimovic, LLC (“Landlord”), the plaintiff in a rent-and-possession action, appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of defendants Will and Andrea Lindsey (by their first names individually, “the Lind-seys” collectively). Because the record supports a conclusion that the Lindseys did not yet owe any rent under an oral modification to the parties’ lease agreement, the trial court did not err in entering judgment for the Lindseys.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).