Case ID: sw3d_461/html/0453-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Timothy CLAY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    WD 77426
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    ORDER FILED: May 19, 2015
    Mark Grothoff, Columbia, MO Counsel for Appellant.
    Richard Starnes, Jefferson City, MO Counsel for Respondent.
    Before Division One: James Edward Welsh, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, and Karen King Mitchell, JJ.
   ORDER

Per Curiam:

Mr. Timothy Clay, Jr., appeals the denial of a 29.15 post-conviction relief motion. He claims trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and call the codefen-dant to corroborate a self-defense theory. He also claims appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to file surveillance video exhibits to support the insufficiency of evidence argument. We affirm.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).