Case ID: ohio-st-3d_60/html/0098-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      \n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Toledo Bar Association v. Richardson.
    [Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Richardson (1991), 60 Ohio St. 3d 98.]
    (No. 90-2076 —
    Submitted January 8, 1991 —
    Decided June 5, 1991.)
    
      Frank E. Kane, Dale W. Fallat and John N. MacKay, for relator. '
    
      Robert Z. Kaplan and Richard S. Wcdinski, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We concur with the findings and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.