Case ID: njl_115/html/0497-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JACK WILLIAMS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RUSSELL HARRIOTT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Submitted May 31, 1935
    Decided October 9, 1935.
    
      For the appellant, Messrs. Collins & Corbin.
    
    For the respondent, Nathan BRabinowitz.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.