Case ID: njl_95/html/0545-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Cueiajvl", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FREDERIC L. HULME, APPELLANT, v. FREDERICK W. DONNELLY ET AL., BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF TRENTON, RESPONDENTS.
    Submitted December 6, 1920
    Decided February 28, 1921.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 95 N. J. L. 30.
    For the appellant, Charles E. Bird.
    
    For the respondents, Ilenry M. Hartman.
    
   Per Cueiajvl

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The ChaNCedloR, Chief Justioe, TREXCirARD, PARKER, BERGEN, MlNTÜRN, KaDISCIÍ, KaT-zeNBACU, White, HeppüNTIeimer, WilliaMS, Taylor, GARDNER, AOKBRSON, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.