Case ID: ga_144/html/0783-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam. Beck and Hill, JJ.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mayor and Aldermen of Savannah v. Morehead et al. Mayor and Aldermen of Savannah v. Stegin et al.
    
    February 26, 1916.
    Injunction. Before Judge Charlton. Chatham superior court. May 31, 1915.
    
      John Bourke Jr. and D. 8. Atkinson, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Oliver & Oliver and Samuel B. Dighton, contra.
   Per Curiam.

These eases are controlled by the decision this day rendered in the case of Hazleton v. City of Atlanta, ante, 775. The points made in the present cases, additional to those there specifically dealt with, are not sufficient to require a different ruling. Under this ruling, it was error to grant an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment reversed in each case.

All the Justices concur.

Beck and Hill, JJ.

While our opinion as to the questions dealt with in the case of Hazleton v. City of Atlanta, this day decided, has undergone no change, we concur in the judgment of reversal, because of the ruling in that ease.