Case ID: so2d_450/html/0250-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lourdes B. ALONSO, Appellant, v. Genaro ALONSO, Appellee.
    No. 83-2342.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 17, 1984.
    Rehearing Denied June 5, 1984.
    Edward C. Yining, Jr., Miami, for appellant.
    Richard M. Gale, Miami, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., DANIEL S. PEARSON, J., and M. IGNATIUS LESTER, Associate Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge

(dissenting).

In the order now before us, the trial court reinstated, without further testimony, the “visitation” provisions of the order this court reversed in its entirety in Alonso v. Alonso, 432 So.2d 174 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). I believe that the present order constitutes an unauthorized departure from our earlier mandate and should therefore itself be reversed. John Crescent Inc. v. Peterson, 401 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), rev. denied, 412 So.2d 469 (Fla.1982); Robinson v. Gale, 380 So.2d 513 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Goodner v. Shapiro, 367 So.2d 1110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).