Case ID: f-appx_710/html/0275-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Antonio Jose ALONZO Defendant-Appellant
    No. 17-2261
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: January 24, 2018
    Filed: January 29, 2018
    Megan A. Healy, Christopher C. Myers, Brett M. Shasky, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of North Dakota, Fargo, ND, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Antonio Jose Alonzo, Pro Se
    Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Antonio Jose Alonzo appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Following de novo review, we agree with the district court that Alonzo was ineligible for the requested sentence reduction based on an amendment to the United States Sentencing Guidelines because his original sentence was derived from the applicable statutory minimum. See United States v. Moore, 734 F.3d 836, 837-38 (8th Cir. 2013). We affirm the judgment and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. 
      
      . The Honorable Ralph R, Erickson, then • United States District Judge for the District of North Dakota, now United States Circuit Judge.