Case ID: f-appx_294/html/0036-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Brenda SAWADA, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General; Regina Ewing, Supervisor; Lisa Miller, Supervisor, Defendants — Appellees.
    No. 07-1159.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 16, 2008.
    Decided: Sept. 23, 2008.
    
      Michael J. Snider, Ari Taragin, Jeffery C. Taylor, Jason I. Weisbrot, Jacob Stat-man, Snider & Associates, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Aria-na Wright Arnold, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appel-lee.
    Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Brenda Sawada appeals the district court’s order denying her motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(f), and granting Defendants-Appellees’ motion for summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sawada v. Potter, No. l:06-cv-00754-AMD (D.Md. Feb. 9, 2007). We grant the motion to withdraw filed by one of Sawada’s attorneys and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.