Case ID: f-appx_579/html/0217-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Duncan Lamarr BURRESS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Timothy PERKINS, Correctional Officer II; Joshua Hypes, Correctional Officer; Jeremy Arbogast, Correctional Officer; Chad Sisk, Correctional Officer; Jesse Foster, Correctional Officer; Charles Legg, Correctional Officer, Lieutenant Shift Commander for Quilliams II; Paul Parry, Assistant Warden Security; David Ballard, Warden; Gary Hinte, Investigator Intelligence Officer; Johnathan Frame, Institutional Investigator; Curtis Dixon, Sergeant, Institutional Investigator; Robert Rhodes, Major, Chief Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 14-6542.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 24, 2014.
    Decided: July 29, 2014.
    Duncan Lamarr Burress, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly M. Bandy, Natalie C. Schae-fer, Shuman, McCuskey & Slicer, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
    
      Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Duncan Lamarr Burress appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burress v. Perkins, No. 2:13-cv-01970 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 20, 2014; Mar. 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.