Case ID: so2d_636/html/0715-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lee HYDER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 82601.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    May 12, 1994.
    
      Lee Max Hyder, pro se, Belle Glade, for petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Michele Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We review Hyder v. State, 630 So.2d 1137 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), in which the court certified a question of great public importance. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

On the authority of Roesch v. State, 633 So.2d 1 (Fla.1993), in which the same certified question was answered, we approve the decision of the district court of appeal.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, SHAW, KOGAN and HARDING JJ., concur.