Case ID: so2d_956/html/1240-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas SEEBER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D07-1624.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 23, 2007.
    
      Arthur B. Brandt of Brandt & Gufford, Stuart, for appellant.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed, without reference to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), a motion simply titled “Motion to Modify Sentence.” The trial court treated the motion as a rule 3.800(c) motion and, after the sixty-day jurisdictional window expired, denied the motion for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss the appeal as a non-appealable order. See State v. Woodard, 866 So.2d 120 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Grosse v. State, 511 So.2d 688 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), rev. denied, 519 So.2d 987 (Fla.1988).

GUNTHER, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.