Case ID: f-appx_256/html/0070-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dianne NELSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. PLACER COUNTY; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 07-15037.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 13, 2007.
    
    Filed Nov. 19, 2007.
    Dianne Nelson, Kasilof, AK, pro se.
    David K. Huskey, Esq., Placer County Counsel County Administrative Center, Auburn, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: McKEOWN, TALLMAN and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Appellant Dianne Nelson appeals the district court’s judgment and order dismissing her second amended complaint with prejudice for failure to prosecute this action. This court reviews the district court’s orders for abuse of discretion, and we affirm. See, e.g., Valley Eng’rs, Inc. v. Electric Eng’g Co., 158 F.3d 1051, 1052 (9th Cir.1998).

Our review of the record and of appellant’s response to this court’s order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See Valley Eng’rs, Inc. v. Electric Eng’g Co., 158 F.3d at 1052; United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.

All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.