Case ID: sw3d_540/html/0442-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eduardo A. MADRID, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 105112
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: February 20, 2018
    Randall Brachman, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant.
    Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, for Respondent.
    Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Sherri B. Sullivan and Kurt S. Odenwald, JJ.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Eduardo Madrid appeals from the judgment entered on his Rule 24.03 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).