Case ID: f-appx_673/html/0334-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN RE: Catherine Denise RANDOLPH, Appellant.
    No. 16-2306
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: January 17, 2017
    Decided: January 19, 2017
    Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s order returning her complaint because it was not in compliance with the prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED