Case ID: f-appx_680/html/0228-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Tafadzwa NHIRA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THOMPSON HOSPITALITY; Compass Group; Maurice Jenoure; Jill Brown; Dina Zaikouk; Dana Mitchell; Dan Kelly; Abdelmajid Zaghari, Defendants-Appellees, and Morgan State University; Bowie State; Todd Burge; Nancy Wediner; Michael Amos; Alessandria Mcgwire, Defendants.
    No. 16-2106
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: February 28, 2017
    Decided: March 13, 2017
    Tafadzwa Nhira, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Patrick Dowd, LITTLER MEN-DELSON PC, Washington, D.C., for Ap-pellees
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tafadzwa Nhira appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants on his whistleblower claim under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1514A (2012), and his claims of retaliation, failure to promote, discriminatory discharge, and discriminatory compensation, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nhira v. Thompson Hospitality, No. 1:14-cv-00676-WMN, 2016 WL 4699414 (D. Md. Sept. 8, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED 
      
       To the extent that Nhira’s informal brief challenges the district court’s dismissal of Morgan State University and Bowie State University, Nhira did not identify the district court’s dismissal orders in his notice of appeal, and consequently, we lack jurisdiction to consider those orders. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(1)(B); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 176-77 (4th Cir. 2014). Furthermore, insofar as Nhira requests remand because the district court decided Defendants’ motion for summary judgment before Defendants answered Nhi-ra’s requests for admissions, we discern no abuse of discretion by the district court. See United States ex rel. Becker v. Westinghouse Savannah River Co., 305 F.3d 284, 290 (4th Cir. 2002).