Case ID: f-appx_121/html/0286-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marshall A. LICHTERMAN, aka Marshall North, Defendant-Appellant.
    
      No. 03-50332. D.C. No. CR-00-00128-GLT-5.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 7, 2005.
    
    Decided Feb. 18, 2005.
    Michael J. Raphael, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, J. Daniel McCurrie, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Santa Ana, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Christopher Johns, Esq., Johns & Allyn, A Professional Corporation, San Rafael, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before FERNANDEZ, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Marshall A. Lichterman appeals from his sentence imposed after his jury trial conviction for wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and interstate travel in execution of a fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a).

In his briefs before this court, Lichterman has raised issues related to his sentence, but not his conviction. We vacate and remand for the district court to resentence Lichterman consistent with the principles announced by the Supreme Court in United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 769, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) and United States v. Ameline, 400 F.3d 646, No. 02-30326, 2005 WL 350811 (9th Cir. Feb.9, 2005).

VACATED AND REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.