Case ID: nys_129/html/1114-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. BURR, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BOROUGH BANK OF BROOKLYN, Respondent, v. McLAUGHLIN, Appellant, et al.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    June 9, 1911.)
    Action by the Borough Bank of Brooklyn against Edward J. McLaughlin, impleaded with others.
   PER CURIAM.

No sufficient reason appears why the officers of the plaintiff should not be examined before trial. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and order for examination reinstated.

BURR, J.,

dissents, solely upon the ground that the testimony sought would be inadmissible upon the trial. Jamestown Business College Association v. Allen, 172 N. Y. 291, 64 N. E. 952, 92 Am. St. Rep. 740,