Case ID: so2d_894/html/1082-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William E. HARDEE, Appellant, v. Rose Marie HARDEE, Appellee.
    No. 1D04-5630.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    March 4, 2005.
    Wendy S. Loquasto, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Daniel T. O’Connell, Gainesville, for Ap-pellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of January 24, 2005, the Court has determined that the appellant’s untimely motion for rehearing did not delay rendition of the underlying final judgment. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.530(b); Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h). Thus, the notice of appeal was insufficient to timely invoke the Court’s jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as untimely.

WEBSTER, PADOVANO and HAWKES, JJ., concur.