Case ID: so2d_223/html/0755-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Roland KILCREASE, and Wilma Kilcrease, his wife, Appellants, v. Roland KILCREASE, for the Use and Benefit of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a corporation, and Raymond Harper, and Diane Harper, Appellees.
    No. K-199.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.
    June 19, 1969.
    Tom C. Meers, Jacksonville, for appellants.
    Ronald L. Palmer, of Mathews, Osborne & Ehrlich, and Boyd, Jenerette & Leemis, Jacksonville, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment appealed is affirmed on authority of Shingleton et al. v. Bussey, 223 So.2d 713, decided by the Supreme Court of Florida May 28, 1969.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.