Case ID: or-app_265/html/0222-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

On appellant’s petition for reconsideration filed July 14,
    reconsideration allowed; former opinion (264 Or App 183, 331 P3d 1052) modified and adhered to as modified August 27,
    petition for review denied December 11, 2014 (356 Or 575)
    STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JAMIE MARIE ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
    
    Washington County Circuit Court
    C112615CR; A152628
    333 P3d 1250
    Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Kyle Krohn, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, for petition.
    Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Nakamoto, Judge, and Egan, Judge.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Defendant has petitioned for reconsideration in this case because, notwithstanding that the disposition of our opinion said that we had affirmed defendant’s convictions except to the extent that we had otherwise reversed and remanded them, our opinion did not expressly state that we had considered two of her three assignments of error on their merits. We did consider and reject those assignments on their merits. We modify the last sentence in the opinion before the disposition to read: “Accordingly, we do not believe that remand on the issue of venue is appropriate in this case, and we reject defendant’s second and third assignments on their merits without further discussion.” We adhere to our opinion, as modified.

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.