Case ID: f2d_77/html/1005-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LOCAL RETAIL CODE AUTHORITY FOR CHICAGO v. IRMA HAT CO.
    No, 5319.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
    June 7, 1935.
    For opinion below, see 7 F. Supp. 687.
    Dwight H. Green, U. S. Atty., of Chicago, Ill., Plarold M. Stephens, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Carl McFarland, A. H. Feller, Basil H. Pollitt, and Henry W. Edgerton, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for appellants.
    Samuel E. Hirsch and Julian H. Levi, both of Chicago, Ill., for appellee.
    Before EVANS, SPARKS, and FITZHENRY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

The questions presented by this appeal have all been disposed of adversely to appellants by the decisions of the Supreme Court in A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corporation et al. v. United States (United States v. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corporation et al.), 55 S. Ct. 837, 79 L. Ed. -, decided May 27, 1935; Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, 293 U. S. 388, 55 S. Ct. 241, 79 L. Ed. -.

A discussion of the facts and issues is therefore unnecessary.

The decree is affirmed.