Case ID: so3d_65/html/0047-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "TOWBIN SINGER, MICHELE, Associate Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, Appellant, v. David POPHAM, Appellee.
    No. 4D09-3300.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 18, 2011.
    Rehearing Denied July 26, 2011.
    Robert F. McLaughlin of Hinshaw & Culbertson, L.L.P., Tampa, for appellant.
    David B. Shelton, Charles P. Mitchell and Steven I. Klein of Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A., Orlando, for Amicus Curiae Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, Inc.
    Patrick St. George Cousins of Cousins Law Firm, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   TOWBIN SINGER, MICHELE, Associate Judge.

Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (“MBUSA”) appeals the trial court’s order awarding attorney’s fees to David Popham (“Pop-ham”), pursuant to section 681.112, Florida Statutes (2010). The underlying facts are as follows: Popham had purchased a new Mercedes-Benz from MBUSA. The car was subsequently declared a “lemon” by the Florida Motor Vehicle Arbitration Board. Neither party appealed the board’s decision and Popham received a refund. Popham’s lawyer (who had represented Popham during the arbitration proceedings) then filed a lawsuit in circuit court seeking recovery of the attorney’s fees pursuant to section 681.112, Florida Statutes. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Popham, ordering MBUSA to pay Popham’s arbitration hearing attorney’s fees.

The issue in this case is whether Florida’s “Lemon Law” authorizes an award of attorney’s fees incurred during arbitration of the refund option. This exact issue was recently addressed and decided in General Motors, LLC v. Bowie, 58 So.3d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). The answer is no, “ ‘damages’ under section 681.112 do not include attorney’s fees incurred in pursuing the refund option through arbitration.” Bowie at 936.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand the final judgment in its entirety and direct the trial court to undertake further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and Remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.