Case ID: f-appx_40/html/0502-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James ANDERSON; Patricia Anderson, Defendants. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Proposed Intervenor-Appellant.
    No. 01-15815.
    D.C. No. CV-98-00744-DWH/RAM.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 10, 2002.
    
    Decided June 14, 2002.
    Before O’SCANNLAIN, BERZON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company appeals the district court’s order denying its motion to intervene as a defendant in this diversity action. We dismiss the appeal.

In a separate memorandum issued this day in appeal No. 01-15537, we affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the underlying action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, this appeal is moot.

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.