Case ID: f-appx_672/html/0717-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

D. L. TAYLOR, a.k.a. Ivory Curtis, a.k.a. I. C. Taylor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. J. JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 16-15257
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted December 14, 2016 
    
    Filed December 23, 2016
    D. L. Taylor, Pro Se
    Jay M. Goldman, Michael James Quinn, Deputy Attorney Generals, AGCA—Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, Virginia I. Papan, Esquire, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, California Department of Justice, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee
    Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

D. L. Taylor, a.k.a. Ivory Curtis, a.k.a. I. C. Taylor, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Brodheim v. Cry, 584 F.3d 1262, 1267 (9th Cir. 2009), and for the reasons stated by the district court we affirm.

Taylor’s requests for judicial notice are denied.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.