Case ID: sw2d_826/html/0088-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re MARRIAGE OF Cheri Rae BUESCHER and Joseph Buescher. Cheri Rae BUESCHER, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Joseph BUESCHER, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. 60098.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Feb. 11, 1992.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 3, 1992.
    Application to Transfer Denied April 21, 1992.
    
      Michael Robert Young, Richard H. Edwards, Edwards, Singer & Wolk, Clayton, for petitioner/appellant.
    Nancy S. Everett, Clayton, for respondent/ respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment in a dissolution case. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).