Case ID: so2d_741/html/0643-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James O’BRIEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 98-4431.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Oct. 6, 1999.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Karen E. Ehrlich, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Debra Rescigno, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s, James O’Brien, revocation of probation. See Williams v. State, 563 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). However, appellee concedes, and we agree, that the order revoking probation must be corrected since it erroneously reflects that appellant violated all six of his conditions of probation. In actuality, the court found that appellant violated only two conditions of probation. Hence, the written order must conform to the court’s pronouncement. See Gonzalez v. State, 712 So.2d 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Affirmed; Remanded with directions.

POLEN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.