Case ID: ad_188/html/0975-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Philip B. Gaynor, Appellant, v. Village of Port Chester, Respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Rich, Putnam and Jaycox, JJ., concurred; Blackmar, J., dissented upon the ground that the learning of Wakefield v. Brophy (67 Misc. Rep. 298; affd., sub nom. Wakefield v. Gaynor, 144 App. Div. 905; affd., 207 N. Y. 772) does not apply, inasmuch as the express statute has declared the claim is for a village purpose; with whom Jenks, P. J., concurred. 
      
      See Laws of 1911, chap. 513.— [Rep. '