Case ID: misc2d_35/html/0176-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

2564 Company, Appellant, v. Angelo D’Addario, Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    November 30, 1961.
    
      Bernstein & Moche (Leonard H. Moche of counsel), for appellant. Marinello & Musicant (Morris Musicant of counsel), for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Where the landlord has presented irrefutable proof that the tenant violated a substantial obligation of his tenancy by repeated and unjustified refusal to pay his rent when due, which necessitated 11 separate dispossess proceedings over a period from October, 1958 to May, 1960, or one every three months, a final order in favor of the landlord should, have been granted (Gilbert v. Becker, 142 N. Y. S. 2d 888; 974 Realty Corp.v. Ledford, 9 Misc 2d 240; Rental Realty Corp. v. Lawrence,. 14 Misc 2d 1070).

The final order in favor of tenant should he reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed in favor of landlord as prayed for in the petition, with costs.

Concur — IIofstadter, J. P., Tilzer and Gold, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.