Case ID: f-appx_25/html/0554-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Juan C. HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
    No. 99-70614. INS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted June 6, 2001.
    Decided Dec. 19, 2001.
    
      Before KOZINSKI and THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and WHYTE, District Judge.
    
    
      
       The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Hernandez argues that he was denied due process when the immigration judge, acting on Hernandez’s application for suspension of deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1254(a), denied him a continuance so he could seek expungement of two state criminal convictions for providing false identification to a police officer.

We affirm the Board’s finding that Hernandez was not prejudiced by the denial. Although Hernandez eventually obtained expungement of his convictions under California’s rehabilitative statute, Cal.Penal Code § 1203.4, the Board held that the expunged convictions could nevertheless serve as the ground for denying Hernandez suspension of deportation. We have upheld the Board’s interpretation of the term “conviction” in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(48)(A) as allowing the INS to ignore state rehabilitative expungements for immigration purposes. Murillo-Espinoza v. INS, 261 F.3d 771, 774 (9th Cir. 2001).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.