Case ID: so2d_711/html/1385-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eldrick W. WOODING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 98-100.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 1, 1998.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Suzanne M. Froix, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before JORGENSON, COPE and GREEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Brock v. State, 688 So.2d 909, 911 (Fla.1997)(holding that trial court may validly impose upon a defendant special condition of probation that is rationally related to State’s need to supervise defendant); Rodriguez v. State, 378 So.2d 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).