Case ID: cole-cas_1/html/0073-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      \n      Per Curiam,\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JULY TERM, 1799.
    Baker ads. Burns.
    
      TEE moved that the defendant be brought up •*-* to take the benefit of the Aft made t; for the “ relief of debtors with refpeft to the imprifonment H of their perfons.”
    
      Munro for plaintiff objefted, iff, That in the inventory ferved on hirn the arms of the defendant are not fpeciiicd in the feheduie; 2d, That the inventory docs not particularize when he owned and had the articles, Ac. 3d, That lie is confined on a fuit for breach of prornife of marriage, and that this is to be confidered as a tort, whereas the Aft only applies to contrafts; 4th, That the inventory is not ftamped. -
    
      Lee contra.
    
   Per Curiam,

All the objections are untenable,

excepting the laft, but the inventory ought to be ftaroped, and that objection is fatal.

Motion denied.