Case ID: ga-app_28/html/0529-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Hill, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

13053.
    Parrott v. Bradley & Company.
    Decided May 6, 1922.
    Certiorari; from Murray superior court — Judge Tarver. October 6, 1921.
    
      H. H. Anderson, for plaintiff in error.
   Hill, J.

A motion for a continuance was made by tbe defendant in the justice court, on the ground that his attorney was absent on account of sickness. The magistrate passed upon the issue of fact involved in this motion and refused to continue the case. The judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to interfere with the discretion of the magistrate and in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.