Case ID: f-appx_71/html/0682-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-50581. D.C. No. CR-02-00009-VAP.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 21, 2003.
    
    Decided July 28, 2003.
    Before LEAVY, HAWKINS and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Because the sentence imposed by the district court falls within the parameters of what we conclude is an unambiguous waiver of the right to appeal contained in appellant’s written plea agreement, see United States v. Nunez, 223 F.3d 956, 959 (9th Cir.2000), and because the terms and conditions of supervised release imposed by the district court did not affect the fairness of the sentencing proceedings, see United States v. Vences, 169 F.3d 611, 613 (9th Cir.1999), we dismiss the appeal.

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.