Case ID: sw3d_482/html/0449-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anthony K. MACK, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 102763
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    
    Filed: February 9, 2016
    Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Mov-ant/Appellant.
    
      Dora A. Fichter, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.
    Before Lisa S. Van Amburg, C.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony K. Mack appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and .the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth ,the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b). 
      
      , All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2014, unless otherwise indicated.