Case ID: so2d_396/html/0196-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William J. SHERLOCK, Appellant, v. Lorraine M. SHERLOCK, Appellee.
    No. WW-292.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Feb. 2, 1981.
    Rehearing Denied March 27, 1981.
    Frank E. Sheffield of Michaels & Sheffield, Tallahassee, for appellant.
    Felix A. Johnston of Woods, Johnston & Carlson, Tallahassee, and Richard W. Ervin and Byron S. Camp of Ervin, Varn, Jacobs, Odom & Kitchen, Tallahassee, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

McCORD and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., and WOODIE A. LILES (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

The wife moves for rehearing on this Court’s per curiam affirmance of her cross-appeal in this cause. Since the record reveals that arrangements, short of partition, could be worked out for the wife to purchase the husband’s remaining equity in the marital home, we are unable to find an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

Motion for Rehearing is DENIED.

McCORD and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., and LILES, WOODIE A. (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.