Case ID: so2d_591/html/1164-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Steven FORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 91-2809.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Jan. 29, 1992.
    Steven Ford, pro se.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Jacqueline Barakat, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant contends the trial court erred when it summarily denied his motion for post-conviction relief. The trial court stated in its order that it had attached “that portion of the files and records which conclusively show that [appellant] is entitled to no relief.” The state concedes that the order in the record on appeal does not contain a copy of any attachments.

4 , , , . Accordingly, we reverse and remand this cause to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing or for an attachment of those portions of the record that refute appellant’s claim of improper calculation of points for victim injury,

REVERSED and REMANDED,

LETTS, DELL and GARRETT, JJ., concur