Case ID: sw2d_922/html/0477-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Beverly HENDRICKS, Employee/Appellant, v. CHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATION, Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of The Second Injury Fund, Respondent.
    No. 69251.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    May 28, 1996.
    Susan K. Roach, Chesterfield, for appellant.
    Betsy J. Levitt, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, for respondent Chrysler Motors Corp.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Joseph Miller, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Louis, for Second Injury Fund.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals the denial of her claim for workers’ compensation and her claim against the Second Injury Fund by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission). The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found that claimant had failed to prove that her injury arose out of and in the course of employment, and the Commission adopted the findings and conclusions of the ALJ. We affirm. The findings of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).