Case ID: sw3d_506/html/0413-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jaye THOMAS, Respondent, v. Anthony PRATT, et al., Appellants.
    WD 79072
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    FILED: January 10, 2017
    Eric S. Payter and Christopher R. Pla-ter, Raytown, for respondent
    Oscar Patricio Espinoza, Kansas City, for appellant
    Before Division One: Anthony Rex Gabbert, P.J., and Thomas H. Newton and Alok Ahuja, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jaye Thomas was injured in an automobile accident with Thomas Pratt. At the time of the accident, Pratt was acting in the course and scope of his employment for Liberty Hardwoods, Inc. Thomas sued Pratt and Liberty Hardwoods for injuries he sustained in the accident. Following a jury trial, the circuit court entered judgment in Thomas’ favor. Pratt and Liberty Hardwoods appeal, contending that the trial court erred in permitting a chiropractor who treated Thomas to testify concerning the possibility that Thomas may in the future require spinal fusion surgery, and concerning the potential cost of that surgery. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).