Case ID: ohio-st-3d_72/html/0299-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n     Wright, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cuyahoga County Bar Association v. Glenn.
    [Cite as Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Glenn (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 299.]
    (No. 94-2674
    Submitted March 7, 1995
    Decided June 14, 1995.)
    
      
      Ellen S. Mandell, Laurie F. Starr and Mildred K. Schad, for relator.
    
      Gerald Robert Walton, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record with care and agree that respondent violated DR 1 — 102(A)(1), (4), and (6), and 9 — 102(A)(2) and (B)(4). However, we find the recommended sanction insufficient to redress misconduct of this severity. We, therefore, order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. We further order that respondent may not be readmitted to the Ohio Bar without proof of having made full restitution to the Chicago Bears and Dent, with interest at the judgment rate. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Douglas, Wright and Resnick, JJ., dissent.

Wright, J.,

dissenting. Because I agree with the recommendation of the panel to suspend respondent from the practice of law in Ohio for one year with the last six months stayed upon the condition that respondent provide full restitution, I respectfully dissent.

Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.