Case ID: pa-super_21/html/0210-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "W. D. Porter, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Haggart v. California Borough, Appellant.
    Argued April 22, 1902.
    October 13, 1902:
    Appeal, No. 2, April T., 1902, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Washington Co., Aug. T., 1900, No. 125, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Mary E. Haggart v. California Borough.
    Before Rice, P. J., Beaver, Ob-lady, W. W. Porter and W. D. Porter, JJ.
    Affirmed.
   Opinion by

W. D. Porter, J.,

All the questions raised by this record were presented in the ease of Roth well et al. v. California Borough, post, p. 234, and have been considered in that opinion. If the plaintiff shall within twenty days file a stipulation reducing tbe judgment nunc pro tunc, as of March 16, 1901, to $500, the judgment will be affirmed.