Case ID: nj-eq_84/html/0504-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles S. Hinchman, complainant-respondent, v. Philadelphia and Reading Railway Company, defendant-appellant.
    [Argued November 20th, 1915.
    Decided June 14th, 1915.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Lewis.
    
      Mr. Frank S. Katzenbach, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Gilbert Collins, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

So far as the decree appealed from provides for the appointment of a receiver, and the sequestration of the property of appellant company located within the State of New Jersey,-we think it cannot be sustained. The remaining portions of the decree are justified by the facts proved; and to that extent the decree will be affirmed.

The respondent is entitled to costs.

For affirmance — None.

For reversal — None.

For modification — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Vredenburgh, White, Terhune, Williams — 13.