Case ID: ohio-st-3d_84/html/1403-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Monday, November 16, 1998
    
    MOTION DOCKET
    98-1274.
    Laidlaw Waste Sys., Inc. v. Consol. Rail Corp.
   Certified State Law Question, No. C2980227. This cause came before the court on the certification of a state law question from the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. On November 12, 1998, petitioner filed a reply brief that was due November 2,1998, under S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII(7). Whereas S.CtPrac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits the untimely filing of a brief,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that petitioner’s reply brief be, and hereby is, stricken.