Case ID: del-cas_2/html/0514-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DANIEL THOMPSON’S LESSEE v. JAMES WATSON and JOHN McINTIRE.
    High Court of Errors and Appeals.
    June 17, 1819.
    
      Ridgely’s Notebook II, 450.
    
   On the application and consent of Mr. Reed for the plaintiff in error and Mr. Vandyke and Mr. Rogers, counsel for the defendant in error, the Court allows this cause to be continued, on account of the length of the session of the Court this term and the quantity of other important business before the Court. But it is understood that the consent of counsel for the continuance shall not be, and is not, a sufficient reason for a continuance.