Case ID: cust-ct_1/html/0428-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dallinger, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Before the Second Division,
    October 4, 1938
    No. 39524.
    Protests 418579-G, etc., of Ferdinand Bing & Co.’s Successors (New York).
   Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel boxes, bottles, vases, coupes, atomizers, sugars, plates, inkstands, trays, photo frames, salts, cruets, centerpieces, candlesticks, baskets, menu holders, bookends, cachepots, jardinieres, and lamps were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 47857), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.