Case ID: sw3d_522/html/0913-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CITY OF KINLOCH, Missouri, Appellant, v. Keith CONWAY, et al., Respondents.
    No. ED 104790
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    Filed: July 18, 2017
    Celestine Dotson, 300 N. Tucker Ste. 301, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Defendants/Respondents Conway and Conway-Buford.
    Felica Ezell Gillespie, 6101 Delmar Ste. A 2nd Floor, St. Louis, MO 63112, For Defendant/Respondent McCray.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

City of Kinloch ( the City) appeals the order and judgment of the trial court finding against it on its request to set aside conveyances of real, property owned by Appellant to Betty McCray, Kena Buford, and Derek Conway (together with Keith Conway, “Defendants”). Appellant alleges these three conveyances were;made in violation of § 432.070 and other Missouri statutes and therefore void. We affirm the judgment of the trial court finding the court did not erroneously declare or apply the law in holding that the deeds should not be . set aside under § 432.070 or § 105.452. The court was not asked to make findings of fact and we presume all factual issues were resolved in accordance with the result reached. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).