Case ID: njl_117/html/0114-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BOROUGH OF WOODCLIFF LAKE, APPELLANT, v. STATE BOARD OF TAX APPEALS ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Argued May 28, 1936
    Decided October 2, 1936.
    For the appellant, Donald M. Waesche.
    
    For the respondents, Chandless, Weller & Selser.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Lloyd, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 6.

For reversal — The Chief Justice, Heher, Perskie, JJ. 3.