Case ID: se2d_794/html/0799-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard O'Neal, Employee v. Inline Fluid Power, Inc. & Automotive Parts Co., Inc., Employer and Auto Owners Insurance Company, Carrier
    No. 261PA15
    Supreme Court of North Carolina.
    April 13, 2016.
    Leonard T. Jernigan, Jr., Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Kristina Brown Thompson, Attorney at Law, M. Hayes Jernigan, Attorney at Law, for O'Neal, Richard.
    Viral V. Mehta, Attorney at Law, Jordan A. Benton, Attorney at Law, Carl M. Short, III, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Inline Fluid Power, Inc. & Automotive Parts Co., Inc., et al.
    ORDER
   Upon consideration of the Plaintiff's Petition for Discretionary Review, the Plaintiff's Petition for Discretionary Review is allowed as to issue number two only. The petition is denied as to any remaining issues. Further, Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Petition for Discretionary Review is allowed; Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Response to Motion to Amend Petition for Discretionary Review is denied.

By order of this Court in Conference, this 13thday of April, 2016.