Case ID: or_82/html/0480-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Submitted on brief January 3,
    affirmed January 9, 1917.
    MITCHELL v. HOWELL.
    (161 Pac. 1199.)
    From Multnomah: George N. Davis, Judge.
    This is an action by A. E. Mitchell against W. G. Howell, in which plaintiff recovered judgment and defendant appeals. The cause was submitted on brief without argument, under the proviso of Supreme Court Bule 18: 56 Or. 622 (117 Pac. xi).
    Affirmed.
    
      For appellant there was a brief over the names of Mr. Albert M. Smith and Mr. John F. Cahalin.
    
    For respondent there was a brief over the name of Mr. Eugene Broohings.
    
    In Banc.
   Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover upon a contract for services. We find no error upon the trial or in the findings, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.