Case ID: sw2d_930/html/0035-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel HORGAN, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. BARNES HOSPITAL and Barnes St. Peters Hospital, Defendants/Appellants.
    No. 68155.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    July 30, 1996.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 9,1996.
    Application to Transfer Denied Oct. 22,1996.
    Kathleen L. Pine, Sandberg, Phoenix & Von Gontard, P.C., St. Louis, for defendants/appellants.
    George L. Fitzsimmons, Gray & Ritter, P.C., St. Louis, for plaintiff/respondent.
    Before GERALD M. SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.
   MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Defendants appeal from a judgment based upon a jury verdict in a medical malpractice case. The evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a statement of the reasons for our affirmance. The judgment is affirmed in compliance with Rule 84.16(b).