Case ID: kan_92/html/1031-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 18,437.
    The First National Bank of Winfield, Appellee, v. Milton A. Bangs et al., Appellees, and Carolina L. Caton et al., Appellants.
    
    Appeal from Cowley district court; Carroll L. Swarts, judge.
    Opinion retaxing costs filed July 6, 1914.
    (For opinion on rehearing see ante, p. 270, 140 Pac. 896.)
    
      F. C. Johnson, S. C. Bloss, and A. M. Jackson, all of Winfield, for the appellants.
    
      W. P. Hackney,- J. T. Lafferty, both of Winfield, and J. Mack Love, of Arkansas City, for the appellee.
   Per Curiam:

The appellant objects to the taxation of the costs of the counter-abstract, amounting to $15. Upon a careful examination the court concludes that the substance of the matter set out in the counter-abstract was contained in the abstract. The objection is therefore allowed, and this item will not be taxed to the appellant.