Case ID: nj_60/html/0175-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN THE MATTER OF MILTON YORMARK, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.
    Argued January 11, 1972
    Decided February 7, 1972.
    
      Mr. Frederick C. Vonhof, for the order.
    
      Mr. Milton Yormark, pro se.
   Pee Curiam.

The respondent was convicted of criminal offenses in connection with a conspiracy to defraud an insurance carrier. The convictions were affirmed by the Appellate Division, 117 N. J. Super. 313 (1971), and we have denied certification. 60 N. J. 138 (1972).

The misconduct requires an order of disbarment, and it is so ordered.

We are advised that respondent intends to seek further review of the convictions in other tribunals. Should he prevail in those efforts, he may apply to us for reconsideration of this order.

For disbarment—Chief Justice Weinteaub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctoe, Hall, Schettino and Mountain—7.

Opposed—Hone.