Case ID: njl_132/html/0169-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per. Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GEORGE H. MILLER, TRADING AS, ETC., APPELLANT, v. WINSTON PAUL ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Submitted May 26, 1944 —
    Decided September 14, 1944.
    For the appellant, Samuel Rosenblatt and Joseph J. Corn.
    
    For the respondents, Brunetto & Welsh.
    
   Per. Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehbr, Pbrskie, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rapeerty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.