Case ID: f-appx_59/html/0949-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Miguel PANIAGUA-ORTIZ, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 02-50307.
    D.C. No. CRr-02-01032-HBT.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 10, 2003.
    
    Decided March 20, 2003.
    Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T. G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Miguel Paniagua-Ortiz appeals the 18-month sentence and one year term of supervised release imposed following his guilty plea conviction for one count of illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Paniagua-Ortiz’s contention that 18 U. S.C. § 3583 violates Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) is foreclosed by our recent decision in United States v. Liero, 298 F.3d 1175, 1177-78 (9th Cir.2002), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 123 S.Ct. 913, 154 L.Ed.2d 820 (2003).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.