Case ID: njl_50/html/0177-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE INHABITANTS OF THE TOWNSHIP OF EATONTOWN, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. MONTILLON WOLLEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For opinion of the Supreme Court, see 20 Vroom 386.
    For the plaintiffs in error, James Steen.
    
    For the defendant in error, Wilbur A. Heisley.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Mague, Reed, Scuddee, Van Syckel, Beown, Clement, McGregor, Pateeson, Whitakee. 11.

For reversal — None.