Case ID: f_112/html/1020-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CAMBRIA IRON CO. v. WILKINS.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    December 17, 1901.)
    No. 77.
    In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
    Herman Aaron, for plaintiff in error. Carlos C. Alden, for defendant in error.
    Before BA-COMBE, Circuit Judge, and TOWNSEND, District Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

The questions presented are wholly questions of fact, and were submitted to the jury under a charge which fully instructed them, and to which no exception was taken. If the jury credited the testimony of the plaintiff, and their verdict shows that they did, they were clearly warranted in finding that he was instrumental in bringing about a meeting of the minds of the parties to the sale of the 22,000 tons of rails, and that there was a distinct understanding that he was to be regarded by the seller as broker in that transaction, and entitled to his commission. The judgment is affirmed.