Case ID: sw2d_863/html/0380-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dwayne MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 62834.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Aug. 31, 1993.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfér to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 4, 1993.
    Application to Transfer Denied Nov. 23, 1993.
    David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., F. Martin Dajani, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Dwayne Miller, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.036 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the motion court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.