Case ID: ad2d_253/html/0489-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ida Schultz, Appellant, v New York Racing Association, Respondent.
    [677 NYS2d 149]
   In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Goldstein, J.), dated June 6, 1997, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff slipped and fell outside the Club House at Aqueduct Race Track as she walked down an exterior incline that was allegedly strewn with litter. The plaintiff, while noticing debris in the area, did not see the debris which caused her to fall, and did not present any evidence as to how long the debris had been present. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant was negligent in failing to maintain the area in a safe condition.

Absent any evidence that a defendant created the dangerous condition or had actual notice of it, and absent a showing of evidentiary facts from which a jury could infer constructive notice from the amount of time that the dangerous condition existed, the complaint was properly dismissed (see, Fasolino v Charming Stores, 77 NY2d 847, 848; Cafiero v Inserra Supermarkets, 195 AD2d 681, affd 82 NY2d 787; Anderson v Klein’s Foods, 139 AD2d 904). It is well settled that a general awareness that litter may be present is insufficient to charge a defendant with notice of the condition alleged to have caused the accident (see, Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 837; Paolucci v First Natl. Supermarket Co., 178 AD2d 636). Thus, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.