Case ID: ad_285/html/0998-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anna Gahan, Respondent, v. Oneida National Bank & Trust Co. of Utica, New York, Appellant.
   Judgement reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted;' With 'cost’s to the- appellant ¡ to' abidé the event!‘ Memorandum: The facts as presented on the trial disclose no situation in which the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur could apply1 (George Foltis, Inc., v. City of New York, 287 N. Y. l08); nor Was the doctrine introduced or suggested!by counsel. The5 dharg¿i:óf "the‘trial!'60U'rt'that thiS>:doctriffe’ applied in-this cáse in-patent' error,' and, 'Under ‘the1 Circumstances "of the5 close questions - of- ne'gligetice'-hefe¡‘ presedted,-'. wag prejudicial1’to'the'kppellánt! ■ All'coiicúr. • (Appeal from a júfigm'ent'tif Oneidá; Tfial‘Ten¿;for plaintiff in -a nCgligence action-) Present - McCurn, P.J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.