Case ID: f-appx_589/html/0223-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: ‘", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Keith Earl GODWIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold CLARKE, Director; Robert F. Haley, II, Commonwealth Attorney; Chesapeake Circuit Court Judge, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 14-7534.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 15, 2015.
    Decided: Jan. 21, 2015.
    Keith Earl Godwin, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: ‘

Keith Earl Godwin appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Godwin v. Clarke, No. 2:13-cv-00691-RAJ-TEM (E.D.Va. Sept. 25, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.