Case ID: f-cas_18/html/1127-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Case No. 10,736.
    PARKER v. HALLOCK.
    [2 Fish. Pat. Cas. 543, note.] 
    
    Circuit Court, Pennsylvania.
    1857.
    
    Patents — Infringement—Limitations.
    Action [by Zebulon Parker against S. B. Hal-lock] for infringement of a patent right. In this case the defendant’s counsel insisted that the plaintiff was barred by the statute of limitations: Belt, that, as no act of congress had been passed to meet the case, and the law of Pennsylvania did not apply to it, there was no statute limiting the time in which a suit might be brought for an infringement of a- patent right. The jury found for the plaintiff, assessing his damages at $68.
    [Cited in Rich v. Ricketts, Case No. 11,762.]
    Fisher and Sweitzer, for .plaintiff.
    Selden, for defendant
    [Before GRIER, Circuit Justice. Nowhere more fully reported; opinion not now accessible. Originally published in 2 Fish. Pat. Cas. 543, as a note to Collins v. Peebles, Case No. 3,-017.]
    
      
       [Reported by Samuel S. Fisher, Esq., and here reprinted by permission.]
    
    
      
       [District not given.]