Case ID: f-appx_45/html/0253-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Phillip Edward BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E. DAVIS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Car-Freshner Corporation, Defendant-Appellee, Car-Freshner Corporation, Defendant & Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cousin Corporation of America, Third Party Defendant.
    No. 02-1324.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 29, 2002.
    Decided Sept. 4, 2002.
    Phillip Edward Bell, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Holdsclaw Boyles, Kilpatrick Stockton, L.L.P., Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Phillip Edward Bell appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denying various pending motions as moot in this copyright infringement action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum and opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bell v. E. Davis Int’l Inc., No. CA-00-131-1-T (W.D.N.C. filed Feb. 14, 2002 & entered Feb. 15, 2002; Mar. 9, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.