Case ID: va-cir_18/html/0469-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "By JUDGE T. J. MARROW", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
    Dailey’s Adm’r v. Joseph C. Baker
    February 16, 1990
    Case No. LR-2687-3
   By JUDGE T. J. MARROW

After the pretrial conference of February 8th, I was to decide whether the economist witness could adjust for income taxes on his earnings estimates or whether defendant could cross-examine or argue this issue. I have concluded that this is an inappropriate and irrelevant issue in estimating the decedent’s earning capacity and should not be entertained as an issue in the trial of this case. See Norfolk Southern v. Rayburn, 213 Va. 812 (1973); Hoge v. Anderson, 200 Va. 364 (1958).