Case ID: ohio-st-3d_72/html/0075-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Application of Parry.
    [Cite as In re Application of Parry (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 75.]
    (No. 95-354
    Submitted March 21, 1995
    Decided March 30, 1995.)
    
      
      Charles W. Kettlewell, for the applicant.
    
      Harris, McClellan, Binan & Cox and John D. Hvizdos; Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease and Charles A. Schneider, for the Admissions Committee of the Columbus Bar Association.
   Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record in this case and agree with the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Parry is not approved for admission to the practice of law in Ohio. However, irrespective of filing deadlines, Parry may reapply for admission and to take the July 1995 bar examination, the approval of which applications shall remain subject to a favorable evaluation of Parry’s character and fitness.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.