Case ID: misc_199/html/0846-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Morris Avenue Operating Corp., Landlord, Appellant, v. Leo Sorrin, Tenant, Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    March 29, 1951.
    
      Kermit Gitenstein for appellant.
    No appearance for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The running of a television wire from outside tenant’s window along the wall of the building without landlord’s permission constitutes a squatting within the purview of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act (165 Corp. v. Haynes, 103 N. Y. S. 2d 305; Prestipino v. Matarazzo, 99 N. Y. S. 2d 606).

The final order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and final order directed for landlord, with costs.

Hofstadter, Schreiber and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.