Case ID: sw3d_465/html/0075-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kerri D. SPINK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 102119
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    Filed: June 30, 2015
    Gwenda Renee Robinson, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Adam Rowley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before Patricia L. Cohen, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kerri D. Spink appeals the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. • We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).