Case ID: f-appx_119/html/0514-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jay R. BROWN, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 04-6831.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 15, 2004.
    Decided: Jan. 13, 2005.
    Jay R. Brown, Appellant pro se.
    Brian Ronald Hood, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Jay R. Brown appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to modify the terms of his supervised release. A district court’s imposition of special conditions of supervised release is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Dotson, 324 F.3d 256, 259 (4th Cir.2003). We have reviewed the record and find that the district court’s refusal to modify the terms of Brown’s supervised release was a proper exercise of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED