Case ID: f-appx_113/html/0561-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harvey E. TUNSTALL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James BEALE, Warden; Gene M. Johnson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 04-7187.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 18, 2004.
    Decided: Nov. 29, 2004.
    Harvey E. Tunstall, Appellant pro se.
    Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Harvey E. Tunstall, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Tunstall has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Tunstall v. Beale, No. CA-04-688-1 (E.D. Va. filed, June 24, 2004; entered, June 25, 2004). Accordingly, we deny Tunstall’s motions for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000).

To the extent that Tunstall’s notice of appeal and appellate brief can be construed as a motion for authorization to file a successive § 2254 petition, we deny such authorization. See United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 995, 124 S.Ct. 496, 157 L.Ed.2d 395 (2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED