Case ID: f-appx_214/html/0361-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Randy L. TORANZO, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 06-7321.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 22, 2006.
    Decided: Jan. 25, 2007.
    Randy L. Toranzo, Appellant Pro Se. Frank DeArmon Whitney, United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Randy L. Toranzo appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to correct alleged clerical errors in his final judgment order pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 36. We have reviewed the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Toranzo, No. 7:02-cr-00075-F (E.D.N.C. May 4, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.