Case ID: okla_40/html/0055-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "KANE, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ST. LOUIS, I. M. & S. RY. CO. v. FARLEY et al.
    
    No. 5098.
    Opinion Filed June 10, 1913.
    Rehearing Denied October 28, 1913.
    (136 Pac. 1196.)
    
      Error from District Court, Rogers County;
    
    
      T. L- Brown, Judge.
    
    Action by W. P. Farley and Heber Skinner, partners as' Farley & Skinner, against the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.
    Dismissed.
    
      Vincent M. Miles, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Seymour Riddle, for defendants in error.
   KANE, J.

This cause comes on to be heard on motion to dismiss the appeal of the plaintiff in error, upon the following grounds: (1) That the case-made of the plaintiff in error herein was not served upon the defendants in error, or upon either of the defendants in error, or upon their attorney, within three days after the rendition of the judgment herein appealed from, nor did the court, or the judge thereof, extend the time for making and serving said case-made. (2) That no order of the court in which said judgment was rendered was made by the court, or by the judge thereof, ancj filed or entered of record herein, extending the time within which the plaintiffs in error should make and serve case-made herein, and that said case-made was not served upon the defendants in error, or either of them, or upon their attorneys, within three days from and after the rendition of the judgment herein appealed from. A great many cases by this court sustain the contention of counsel for defendants in error. The motion to dismiss must be sustained.

All the Justices concur.