Case ID: f-appx_301/html/0587-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gabriele Elizabeth LOPEZ, aka Gabriele Elizabeth Koenig, Nee Konig, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-35389.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Oct. 30, 2008.
    Stephanie A. Van Marter, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    
      Beth M. Bollinger, Esquire, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Tarik S. Adlai, Law Offices of Tarik S. Adlai, Pasadena, CA, Sheryl Gordon McCloud, Esquire, Law Offices of Sheryl Gordon McCloud, Seattle, WA, for Amicus Curiae.
    Before: FISHER, GOULD and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

Defendant-Appellant Gabrielle Elizabeth Lopez’s Petition for Rehearing is granted. The parties are instructed to file simultaneous briefs addressing: (1) whether the term “second or successive” in 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244 and/or 2255 contains an exception for second in time petitions containing claims based on certain types of newly discovered evidence; and (2) whether construing the term “second or successive” to allow a legitimate excuse exception for second in time petitions containing claims based on new evidence would render superfluous the gate-keeping provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244 and/or 2255.

The supplemental brief of each party shall not exceed fifteen (15) pages in length and shall be filed on or before twenty-one (21) days from the date of filing of this order. The briefs shall conform with Ninth Circuit Rule 32-3.