Case ID: so2d_769/html/1040-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dorothy MURPHY, et al., Petitioners, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent. Barbara’s Creative Jewelry, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v. Florida Department of Transportation, Respondent.
    Nos. SC93551, SC93554.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Oct. 5, 2000.
    Amy Brigham Boulris of Brigham, Moore, Gaylord, Schuster, Merlin & Robin, Miami, Florida; and Mark S. Ulmer, Miami, Florida, for Petitioners.
    Pamela S. Leslie, General Counsel, and Marianne A. Trussell, Deputy General Counsel, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in State Department of Transportation v. Barbara’s Creative Jewelry, Inc., 728 So.2d 240 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), which certified a question to be of great public importance. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we find that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

LEWIS, J., dissents.