Case ID: f_170/html/1020-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE MATANZAS.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    May 25, 1909.)
    No. 264.
    Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
    For opinion" below, see 166 Fed. 985.
    B,0binson, Biddle & Benedict (W. S. Montgomery, of counsel), for appellant. Wing, Putnam & Burlingham (Charles C. Burlingham, of counsel), for ap-pellee.
    Before LACOMBE, COXE, and NOYES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

There seems to be more than the usual number of contradictions, inconsistencies, and untrustworthy estimates in this record. We are not inclined to reverse the findings of fact or the conclusions of the District Judge who heard all the libelant’s witnesses and the more important ones called by the claimant. Decree affirmed, with costs.