Case ID: so2d_666/html/0554-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rod FIELDS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 95-485.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 15, 1995.
    Rehearing Denied Feb. 7, 1996.
    De la 0, Marko & Wang and Miguel M. de la 0, Miami, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Wanda Raiford, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before BASKIN, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

After a careful review of the record, we find that the trial court did not abuse its broad discretion regarding the admissibility of evidence. Jent v. State, 408 So.2d 1024, 1029 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1111, 102 S.Ct. 2916, 73 L.Ed.2d 1322 (1982). Additionally, if there was any error in the admission of this evidence, that error was harmless in light of the solid eyewitness identification of the defendant. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.