Case ID: ad_240/html/0892-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sarah Butensky, Appellant, v. Herman D. Goldberg, Respondent.
   Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. There was a question of fact as to the negligence of defendant. (Greenley v. Miller’s, Incorporated, 111 Conn. 584.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm. (Wein v. Woolworth Co., 223 App. Div. 794; Woolworth & Co. v. Conboy, 170 Fed. 934; Lord v. Sherer Dry Goods Co., 205 Mass. 1.)