Case ID: neb_54/html/0760-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Irvine, C.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edward T. Staples et al. v. Arlington State Bank.
    Filed April 21, 1898.
    No. 8035.
    Continuance: Exception to Ruling: Review. To review an order denying a continuance it is necessary to take an exception to 'the ruling in the trial court.
    Error from the district court of Washington county. Tried below before Keysor, J.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    
      Davis & Howell, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      W. S. Cook and Frick & Dolezal, contra.
    
   Irvine, C.

The plaintiffs in error complain in their briefs of only-one ruling of the district court the overruling of an. application for a continuance. No exception was taken to the order complained of and it cannot, therefore, be reviewed. (Coad v. Home Cattle Co., 32 Neb. 761.)

Affirmed.