Case ID: us_274/html/0723-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 313.
    Real Silk Hosiery Mills v. City of Piedmont, Oliver Ellsworth, Mayor, G. N. Richardson, City Attorney, etc., et al.
    Certificate from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
    Argued April 29, 1927.
    Decided May 16, 1927.
    
      Mr. John G. Milburn, with whom Messrs, Ralph Bamberger, Henry B. Dinkelspeil, and Joseph W. Welsh were on the brief, for appellant.
    
      Mr. Edwin C. Brandenburg, with whom Messrs. G. N. Richardson, C. A. Brandenburg, and Louis M. Denit were on the brief, for- appellees.
   Per Curiam.

Question No. 1 is answered yes on the authority of Real Silk Hosiery v. City of Portland, 268 U. S. 335. Mr. Justice Brandeis and Mr. Justice Sanford dissent. In view of the answer to the first question, the second question needs none.