Case ID: ala-app_23/html/0681-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BRIOKEN, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(125 So. 927)
    Ernest THOMPSON v. STATE.
    (6 Div. 669.)
    Court óf Appeals of Alabama.
    Dec. 17, 1929.
   BRIOKEN, P. J.

There was a general verdict of guilty as charged in the indictment which contained two counts, one for distilling, making, or manufacturing prohibited liquors, and the s'eeond charged the possession of a still, etc., to be used for that purpose.

There is no bill of, exceptions, the appeal being predicated upon the record proper upon which no error appears. The record being regular in all things, the judgment of the circuit court, from which this appeal was taken, is affirmed.

Affirmed.