Case ID: ga-app_33/html/0613-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

16285.
    Hart v. The State.
    Decided March 27, 1925.
    ' Conviction of possessing intoxicating liquor; from Fulton superior court—Judge E. D. Thomas. January 10, 1925.
    
      J. Walter LeCraiv, for plaintiff in error.
    
      John A. Boylcin, solicitor-general, Ralph II. Pharr, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was demanded by the evidence, and none of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial requires a reversal of the judgment refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.