Case ID: f-appx_597/html/0804-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Noe PACHECO-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 14-50926
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    March 17, 2015.
    Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Doyle L. Young, Law Office of Doyle L. Young, P.C., Waco, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Noe Pacheco-Garcia, Three Rivers, TX, pro se.
    Before SMITH, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Noe Pacheco-Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Pacheco-Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant parts of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. However, in light of the nonreversible error in categorizing Pacheco-Garcia’s Texas sexual assault conviction as an aggravated felony, the judgment of the district court is REFORMED to show that Pacheco-Garcia was convicted and sentenced under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1). See United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 367-69 (5th Cir.2009). Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.