Case ID: so2d_626/html/1277-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SHORES, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Velson Fox DANIEL v. Gene WILSON, individually and as administrator of the estate of Elo Daniel, deceased.
    1920705.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    July 23, 1993.
    Rehearing Denied Aug. 27, 1993.
    
      Richard O. Fant, Jr., Tuscaloosa, for appellant.
    William D. King IV, Carrollton, for appel-lee.
   SHORES, Justice.

Velson Fox Daniel appeals from the final settlement of the estate of his brother, Elo Daniel, in Pickens County, Alabama. The judgment of the trial court is due to be affirmed on the authority of Rule 28, A.R.App.P.; Eady v. Stewart Dredging & Construction Co., 463 So.2d 156 (Ala.1985); Lambert v. Pinckard Agency, Inc., 516 So.2d 697 (Ala.Civ.App.1987); and Cummins v. Slayton, 545 So.2d 783 (Ala.Civ.App.1989). “While we attempt to avoid dismissing appeals or affirming judgments on what may be seen as technicalities, we are sometimes unable to address the merits of an appellant’s claim when the appellant fails to articulate that claim and presents no authorities in support of that claim.” Stover v. Alabama Farm Bureau Ins. Co., 467 So.2d 251, 253 (Ala.1985).

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX and HOUSTON, JJ., concur.

KENNEDY, J., concurs in the result.