Case ID: so2d_584/html/1137-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED MARINE, INC., Appellant, v. Lawrence RAILL, Appellee.
    No. 91-678.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Sept. 10, 1991.
    
      Bailey, Hunt, Jones & Busto, Richard M. Davis, Ellen S. Venzer, and Sara Soto, Miami, for appellant.
    Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Rosen & Quentel, David L. Ross, Marlene K. Silverman and Marc J. Gottlieb, Miami, for appellee.
    Before NESBITT, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

United Marine, Inc., appeals a temporary injunction entered in a suit on a covenant not to compete, asserting that it was entitled to greater injunctive relief than that granted by the trial court. “The granting or denying of a temporary injunction is a matter within the discretion of the trial court, and the exercise of such discretion will not be disturbed on appeal unless a clear showing is made that there was an abuse.” Cordis Corp. v. Prooslin, 482 So.2d 486, 490-91 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Cordis enumerates the factors to be considered, and no abuse of discretion in applying those factors has been shown. See also § 542.33, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1990).

Affirmed.