Case ID: ad3d_82/html/0901-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Okechukwu Amaobi, Appellant.
    [918 NYS2d 372]
   Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence. The police pursuit of the defendant and subsequent recovery of a handgun were based on police observations that the defendant was committing a crime and then fled when the police approached him (see People v Holmes, 81 NY2d 1056, 1057-1058 [1993]; People v Wynn, 25 AD3d 576, 577 [2006]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Delgado, 80 NY2d 780, 783 [1992]). Mastro, J.E, Balkin, Leventhal and Miller, JJ., concur.