Case ID: f-appx_653/html/0896-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonathan Tyler PRIVE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-12032
    Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    (May 24, 2016)
    Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Daniel Brodersen, appointed counsel for Jonathan Prive in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Prive’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Additionally, Prive’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED.