Case ID: njl_106/html/0249-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NEW JERSEY ALUMINUM COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. CHARMS COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Submitted May 31, 1929
    Decided February 3, 1930.
    For the respondent, Lum, Tamblyn & Colyer.
    
    For the appellant, Charles S. Smith.
    
   Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.'

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchaed, Parker, Kalisch, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Van Bus-kirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.