Case ID: kan_74/html/0895-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

M. G. Bowman v. A. N. Pitsenberger.
    No. 14,665.
    (85 Pac. 1134.)
    Error from Morris district court; Oscar L. Moore, judge.
    Opinion filed June 9, 1906.
    Affirmed.
    
      John Maloy, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Nicholson & Pirtle, for defendant in error.
   Per Curiam:

The only question presented in this case is that the verdict is not sustained by the evidence. No objections are made to the admission or rejection of evidence and none to the instructions given to the jury.

This court cannot weigh or reconcile evidence. The conclusion reached by the jury was reasonable and fully justified by the testimony given. There is nothing to indicate mistake, passion, or prejudice. The judgment is affirmed.