Case ID: ad3d_90/html/0559-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Another Slice, Inc., Appellant, v 3620 Broadway Investors LLC, Respondent.
    [934 NYS2d 705]
   We agree with both parties that the court properly granted a Yellowstone injunction (see First Natl. Stores v Yellowstone Shopping Ctr., 21 NY2d 630 [1968]), and that dismissal was improper. Gold-Land, Inc. v Haskell (248 AD2d 132 [1998]), on which the court relied, presents the opposite factual scenario and gives no support for dismissal. In Gold-Land, dismissal was appropriate because Supreme Court denied Yellowstone relief. Concur — Saxe, J.P, Catterson, Moskowitz, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.