Case ID: f-appx_320/html/0554-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Wilson THOMAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles A. DANIELS, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 07-35640.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted March 18, 2009.
    
    Filed March 24, 2009.
    Wilson Thomas, Taft, CA, pro se.
    Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Federal prisoner Wilson Thomas appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and from the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2258, and we affirm.

Thomas contends that, although the district court denied his petition on res judi-cata grounds, he is entitled to relief in light of House v. Bell, 547 U.S. 518, 126 S.Ct. 2064, 165 L.Ed.2d 1 (2006). This contention is without merit.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.