Case ID: ga_100/html/0090-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Simmons, C. J.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ANDERSON & COMPANY v. NIXON.
    Argued November 30,
    Decided December 7, 1896.
   Simmons, C. J.

1. Under the facts disclosed by the record it does: not appear that any error was committed in allowing the claimant to withdraw -her admission, made at the beginning of the trial, that the defendant in execution was in possession of the-property in dispute at the time of the levy. Irwin et al. v. McKnight, 76 Ga. 670, 673.

2. The evidence warranted the verdict, and there was no error in ■denying a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

levy and claim. Before Judge Smith. Dodge superior-court. March term, 1896.

1Smith <& 'Okments and E. Herrman, for plaintiffs.

DeLacy <& Bishop, for claimant.