Case ID: h-mch_4/html/0351-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GENERAL COURT,
    MAY TERM, 1799
    Dorsey’s Executrix vs. Stevenson’s Administrator.
    Error to Frederick county court. The judgment had been rendered by confession for assets in futuro, without any declaration being filed} the plaintiff’s cause of action is stated in the record.
   The Generar Court reversed the judgment.

Tiie same decision in Green’s ad minissrator vs; (loudens administrator, in two cases, one on the original judgment, an(l ^ie other on fiat on Sci. fa. Vide 3 Harr. and M'Hen., 389, 408, and contra, where there had been a reference to arbitrators, and an award returned, upon which judg - ment was rendered — ./ó. 388.