Case ID: sw2d_689/html/0126-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James Robert RUCKER, Appellant, v. Vickie Sue RUCKER, Respondent.
    No. WD 35953.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    April 2, 1985.
    Joseph Y. DeCuyper and Donnie R. Davis, Kansas City, for appellant.
    Clyde G. Meise, Kansas City, for respondent.
    Before CLARK, P.J., and SOMERVILLE and KENNEDY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from those provisions of decree of dissolution which award wife marital property of the value of $30,419.93 as against marital property awarded to him of the value of $15,880, each including one-half the value of the parties’ real estate; which award wife $2,400 maintenance in gross; and which award wife attorney’s fees totaling $5,000 for trial and appeal.

We have examined the trial record and the contentions of the parties. The trial court was within the range of discretion accorded to him in each of the awards criticized by the husband. The legal principles which govern the case have been thoroughly explicated by cases already printed in the law books. An extended opinion would have no value as precedent. Rule 84.16(b).

Judgment affirmed.