Case ID: njl_45/html/0187-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NATHAN GASKILL ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. E. L. B. WALES, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    In error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiffs in error, F. Voorhees.
    
    For the defendant in error, W. A. Barrows.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

For affirmance — Hone.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Dixon, Knapp, Magie, Reed, Scudder, Yan Syckel, Clement, Cole, Green, Kirk, Paterson, Whitaker. 15.