Case ID: conn-app_139/html/0146-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ANNE M. BRADLEY v. JERALD S. BARBER ET AL.
    (AC 33793)
    DiPentima, C. J., and Lavine and Bear, Js.
    Argued September 21
    officially released November 13, 2012
    
      
      Anne M. Bradley, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).
    
      Jerald S. Barber, for the appellees (defendants).
   Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, Anne M. Bradley, appeals from the judgment of dismissal rendered pursuant to Practice Book § 14-3. The court has reviewed the record, briefs and oral argument thoroughly in this case and has considered the applicable law. We find no error by the trial court in its order dismissing the action.

The judgment is affirmed.