Case ID: ohio-law-abs_7/html/0639-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DAY, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE ex Hollo v INDUST COMM.
    Ohio Supreme Court
    No. 21903.
    Decided Oct. 23, 1929
   Syllabus by

DAY, J.

EMPLOYER & EMPLOYE

(250 lb) While an award made under the Industrial Commission Act for an injury . to an employe and an additional award made for violation of a specific requirement causing such injury, are separate and distinct awards, yet, growing out of the same probative facts and affecting the same parties, they are to be regarded as so interdependent that the Commission, under the discretion given it by 1465-86 GC, may make ■ such modifications or changes with reference to either of said awards as in its opinion are justified.

Marshall, CJ., Kinkade and Matthias, JJ., concur. Robinson and Jones, JJ., not participating.