Case ID: so2d_589/html/1040-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Benoit Joseph Jean TARDIF, et al., Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 90-2210, 90-2714.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 10, 1991.
    Alan Jay Braverman, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant Tardif.
    Sonnett Sale & Kuehne and Benedict P. Kuehne, Miami, for appellant Miller,
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Monique T. Befeler, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We reverse based on the authorities of Amado v. State, 585 So.2d 282 (Fla.1991) and Essex v. State, 539 So.2d 559 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

We find that the remaining points raised by the defendants lack merit.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial.