Case ID: sw2d_837/html/0024-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Linda J. RINDERER, Claimant/Respondent, v. MAPLEWOOD EYE CARE GROUP, Employer/Appellant.
    No. 61457.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Aug. 11, 1992.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 14, 1992.
    David R. Swimmer, Private Atty., Clayton, for employer/appellant.
    Nancy R. Mogab, Mogab & Hughes, St. Louis, for claimant/respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employer appeals from an award to claimant by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).