Case ID: f-appx_224/html/0725-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kenneth KINNARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROGERS TRUCKING; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 06-16297.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 12, 2007.
    
    Filed March 16, 2007.
    Kenneth Kinnard, San Francisco, CA, pro se.
    Edwin J. Wilson, Jr., Esq., Erickson Beasley Hewitt & Wilson, LLP, Oakland, CA, Audrey D. Bojack, Esq., The Narayan Law Firm, Burlingame, CA, Martin G. Mamett, Castle & Associates, Los Angeles, CA, Sara Winslow, Esq., USSF — Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: CANBY, TROTT and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

We have reviewed appellant’s many filings in response to this court’s order to show cause. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court order denying the motion for new trial should be affirmed. Although appellant claimed that he was too ill to file a motion for reconsideration on time in the district court, he filed numerous other motions during that same time period. Accordingly, the district court properly denied the motion.

All other pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.