Case ID: ohio-st_121/html/0625-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Snook v. The State of Ohio.
    (No. 22030
    Decided December 24, 1929.)
    
      Mr. E. 0. ■ Ricketts, Mr. Arthur G. Fricke, Mr. Arthur M. Spiegel, Mr. John F. Seidel and Mr. M. C. Seyfert, for plaintiff in error.
    
      
      Mr. John J. Chester, Jr., prosecuting attorney, Mr. Myron B. Gessamcm, Mr. Paul C. Hicks and Mr. Robert J. Odell, for defendant in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

Marshall, C. J., Kinkade, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.