Case ID: so2d_668/html/0995-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alphonso RODDY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 86256.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Feb. 29, 1996.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, for Petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Wanda Raiford, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Roddy v. State, 658 So.2d 144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), which certified the same question of great public importance answered by this Court in State v. Daniel, 665 So.2d 1040 (Fla.1995). We have jurisdiction. Art. Y, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Based on Daniel, the decision below is approved.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.