Case ID: njl_116/html/0218-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOHN K. P. VOIGHT, RESPONDENT, v. McEWAN BROTHERS, APPELLANT.
    Submitted October 25, 1935 —
    Decided January 31, 1936.
    For the respondent, Herman M. Cone.
    
    For the appellant, Clarence B. Tippiti.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.