Case ID: f-appx_32/html/0443-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Susan SHANNON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. William J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 01-15383.
    D.C. No. CV-00-02793 SBA.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 11, 2002.
    
    Decided March 21, 2002.
    Before CANBY, BEEZER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). The panel therefore denies Shannon’s request for oral argument.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Susan Shannon appeals the district court’s summary judgment for defendants in her action alleging employment discrimination and wrongful termination on the basis of disability. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, Leona v. U.S. Dep’t of State, 105 F.3d 548, 550 (9th Cir.1997), and we affirm.

Shannon failed to timely exhaust her administrative remedies prior to filing suit. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105; Vinieratos v. United States, 939 F.2d.762, 768 (9th Cir. 1991). Shannon failed to show a triable issue of material fact regarding her eligibility for either equitable tolling, see Leorna, 105 F.3d at 551, or equitable estoppel, see Stallcop v. Kaiser Found. Hosp., 820 F.2d 1044, 1050 (9th Cir.1987).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.