Case ID: conn_210/html/0805-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

State of Connecticut v. Frank Rogers
    
      Robert M. Casale, in support of the petition.
    
      Harry Weller, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
    Decided January 12, 1989
   The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 16 Conn. App. 245, is granted, limited to the following issue: ,

“Did the Appellate Court err in affirming the defendant’s conviction and holding that the wiretap panel’s failure to make a written determination of probable cause, pursuant to General Statutes §§ 54-41d (7) and 51-41e, that a special need existed to intercept wire communications over a public telephone was not reversible error?”