Case ID: so2d_349/html/0810-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HENRY HARTWELL HESTER ARCHITECT A. I. A. a/k/a Architect Henry Hartwell Hester A. I. A. & Associates, Appellant, v. G. A. VAN HEUSDEN and Harold T. Beck et al., Appellees.
    No. DD-307.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Sept. 12, 1977.
    Stephen G. Salley and Gordon H. Harris of Gray, Adams, Harris & Robinson, Orlando, for appellant.
    Curtis R. Mosley and Joe T. Caruso of Wolfe, Kirschenbaum, Caruso & Mosley, Cocoa Beach, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

Having considered the issues under point one of appellant’s brief and having determined that we do not have jurisdiction to consider those issues, Eristavitchitcherine v. Miami Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 154 Fla. 100, 16 So.2d 730 (1944) and Hollywood Inc. v. Clark, 153 Fla. 501, 15 So.2d 175 (1943), that portion of appellant’s appeal incorporated under point one is dismissed.

Having determined from the record and the briefs of the parties there is substantial competent evidence to support the deficiency judgment, the deficiency judgment is affirmed.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and ERVIN, JJ., concur.