Case ID: utah-2d_21/html/0367-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HENRIOD, Justice:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

445 P.2d 983
    STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. David Eugene MAESTES, Defendant and Appellant.
    No. 11227.
    Supreme Court of Utah.
    Oct. 17, 1968.
    
      David Eugene Maestes, pro se.
    Phil L. Hansen, Atty. Gen., Gerald G. Gundry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.
   HENRIOD, Justice:

M appeals from a jury verdict and judgment of conviction for stealing a stereo. Affirmed.

Pie says 1) he was not afforded the interdictions of Miranda v. State of Arizona, which appears not so; 2) that there was insufficient evidence to convict, which the record reflects is not so; 3) that it was error for the police officer not to disclose his informant, — no one asking him to and this point being raised for the first time on appeal, and not being a point on appeal in any event; and 4) that a refused requested instruction constituted error, which is not so.

CROCKETT, C. J., and CALLISTER and TUCKETT, JJ., concur.

ELLETT, Justice, concurs in the result. 
      
      . 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974 (1966).