Case ID: f-appx_49/html/0125-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Paul Michael PHILLIPS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 02-55705.
    D.C. No. CV-01-09372-DDP.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 7, 2002.
    
    Decided Oct. 10, 2002.
    Before FERNANDEZ, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Phillips' request for oral argument is denied.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Paul Michael Phillips appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his post-judgment motion for “a magistrate discovery motion hearing” and his “notice of procedural discordance.” We agree with the district court that Phillips is not entitled to the relief which he requested, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order of April 10, 2002.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.