Case ID: sw3d_331/html/0722-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Terry WOODS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 94909.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Feb. 22, 2011.
    
      Jessica Hathaway, St. Louis, MO, For Movant/Appellant.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, For Respondent.
    Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terry Woods appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 without an eviden-tiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).