Case ID: nj-eq_121/html/0255-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Helen E. T. Kelly, petitioner-respondent, v. William J. Kelly, defendant-appellant.
    [Submitted October term, 1936.
    Decided January 22d, 1937.]
    
      
      Mr. Louis L. Ilendler, for the defendant-appellant.
    
      Messrs. Theodore Strong «£• Son (Mr. Stephen V. R. Strong), for the petitioner-respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We are satisfied from our examination of the proofs that the findings of the learned advisory master were proper.

The decree is, therefore, affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.