Case ID: njl_105/html/0239-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Ctjbiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROSY KERTESZ, APPELLANT, v. JOSEPH FELDHEIM, RESPONDENT.
    Argued May 17, 1928
    Decided October 15, 1928.
    For the appellant, Isidor B. Glucksman.
    
    For the respondent, Merman Waldman.
    
   Pee Ctjbiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance- — The Chief Justice, Teenchaed, Mintukn, Black, Campbell, White, Yak Buskiek, McGlennoh, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 11.

For dismissal — Paekee, J. 1.