Case ID: f-appx_66/html/0140-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Phil P. IVALDY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. The BOEING COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 01-55593. D.C. No. CV-99-01201-DOC.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted June 2, 2003.
    Decided June 12, 2003.
    Before REINHARDT, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
   MEMORANDUM

Phil Ivaldy appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment. The facts and prior proceedings are known to the parties, and are restated herein only as necessary.

We dismiss Ivaldy’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Ivaldy knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in exchange for Boeing’s not seeking attorney fees under the relevant federal and state statutes. He does not raise a valid argument for why the agreement does not comply with the requirements of 29 U.S.C. § 626(f)(2) and should not be enforced. The case is therefore moot. Riverhead Sav. Bank v. National Mortg. Equity Corp., 893 F.2d 1109, 1112 (9th Cir.1990); see also U.S. Bancorp Mortg. Co. v. Bonner Mall P’ship, 513 U.S. 18, 26-29, 115 S.Ct. 386, 130 L.Ed.2d 233 (1994); Lake Coal Co. v. Roberts & Schaefer Co., 474 U.S. 120, 120, 106 S.Ct. 553, 88 L.Ed.2d 418 (1985) (per curiam).

Boeing’s request for double costs and attorney fees is DENIED.

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.