Case ID: so3d_95/html/1054-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Barbara ALVAREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D11-1468.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Sept. 12, 2012.
    Jack A. Fleischman of Fleischman & Fleischman, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Luis E. Reynoso of Law Offices of Walter A. Reynoso, P.A., Coral Gables, for appellant.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   On Request To Certify Question to the Florida Supreme Court

PER CURIAM.

We certify the following question, also certified in Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), as a question of great public importance:

SHOULD THE RULING IN PADILLA V. KENTUCKY, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN POSTCONVTCTION PROCEEDINGS?

WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.