Case ID: so3d_149/html/0724-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Derrick G. JAMES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D14-378.
    District. Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 22, 2014.
    Ana M. Davide, for appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before WELLS, EMAS and SCALES, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(h) (providing that “a court may dismiss a second or successive motion if the court finds that it fails to allege new or different grounds for relief and the prior determination was on the merits....”); McCrae v. State, 437 So.2d 1388,1390 (Fla.l983)(hold-ing that a rule 3.850 motion based upon grounds which either were or could have been raised on appeal may be summarily denied, and further holding that a rule 3.850 motion is “successive” when it raises substantially the same grounds as a previous motion and that previous motion was decided on the merits). See also, Zeigler v. State, 632 So.2d 48 (Fla.1993); Foster v. State, 614 So.2d 455 (Fla.1992).