Case ID: misc_203/html/0410-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph Rosenblum et al., Doing Business as Nineteen Building Co., Landlords, Appellants, v. Abraham H. Lanes, Tenant, Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    December 4, 1952.
    
      
      Victor WMtehorn and Joseph Delman for appellants.
    
      Abraham H. Lanes, respondent in person.
   Per Curiam.

Admittedly the squatter erected and maintained the television antenna without landlord’s permission or consent. This constituted an intrusion or squatting within the purview of subdivision 4 of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act. (Maple Lane Apts. v. Berson, N. Y. L. J., Jan 11, 1952, p. 150, col. 4; Maiorana v. Dubnick, N. Y. L. J., March 14,1952, p. 1042, col. 6; Thatford Stone Corp. v. Sassano, N. Y. L. J., June 27, 1952, p. 2521, col. 2; Swill v. Kerne, N. Y. L. J., Oct. 15, 1951, p. 842, col. 4; Mackin Realty Corp. v. Matfus, 113 N. Y. S. 2d 61.)

The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $30 costs to the landlord, and final order directed in favor of the landlord as prayed for in the petition.

Feeeelly, Coldee" and Walsh, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.