Case ID: njl_102/html/0466-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FREDERICK SEFTON, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Argued October 28, 1925
    Decided February 1, 1926.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 101 N. J. L. 294, sub nomine Landell v. State.
    For the appellant, Bleakly, Stockwell & Burling.
    
    For the respondents, Edward L. Katzenbach and John Milton.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Black in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.