Case ID: njl_99/html/0532-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HENRY A. ALLEN, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF PATERSON ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Submitted December 10, 1923
    Decided April 17, 1924.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 98 N. J. L. 661.
    For the appellant, Randal B. Lends.
    
    For the respondents, Ilarry J. Breen and Rosencrans & Rosencrans.
    
    For the city of Paterson, Edward P. Merrey.
    
   Per Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn, except that we express no opinion upon that part of the Supreme Court’s deliverance which deals with the validity of any part of tire zoning ordinance of the city of Paterson, because no' reason was filed in the Supreme Court for setting aside the resolution under review, which raised that question.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Then-chard, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.