Case ID: ga-app_47/html/0692-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

23127.
    North Carolina Mutual and Provident Association v. Ross.
    Decided October 6, 1933.
    
      H. A. Woodward, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Josephine W. McDonald, Estes Doremus, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

The special grounds of the motion for a new trial are merely in elaboration of the general grounds of the motion. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial court and no error of law appearing, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., eonmr.