Case ID: sw3d_196/html/0655-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel BARRY and Linda Gochenauer, Appellants, v. ASHNER COMPANY, Respondent.
    No. ED 86594.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    July 18, 2006.
    Donald Heck, Attorney at Law, St. Louis, MO, for appellants.
    Thomas G. Berndsen, Attorney at Law, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Daniel Barry (“Barry”) and Linda Gochenauer (“Gochenauer”), appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, entered after a bench trial, denying Appellants’ petition for declaratory judgment, quiet title, slander of title, and specific performance, and granting Respondent’s, Ashner Company (“Ash-ner”), counterclaim requesting, inter alia, the trial court to reform the deed in question. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the decision of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.