Case ID: nj-misc_4/html/1013-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cubiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE, EX REL. DAVID CONKLIN, v. C. FRANKLIN WILSON, JUDGE, ETC. STATE, EX REL. MAX REIDLER, v. C. FRANKLIN WILSON, JUDGE, ETC. STATE, EX REL. JOHN P. WALSH, v. C. FRANKLIN WILSON, JUDGE, ETC. STATE, EX REL. FREDERICK HUBERT, v. C. FRANKLIN WILSON, JUDGE, ETC. STATE, EX REL. DANIEL ALLEN, v. C. FRANKLIN WILSON, JUDGE, ETC. STATE, EX REL. ARTHUR J. McDONNELL, v. C. FRANKLIN WILSON, JUDGE, ETC. STATE, EX REL. EDWARD L. CLARK, v. C. FRANKLIN WILSON, JUDGE, ETC.
    Decided November 30, 1926.
    On return to alternative mandamus.
    
    Before Gummere, Chief Justice, and Justices Trenohaed and Mintuen.
    Por the relators, Elmer W. Romine.
    
    Por the respondent, Charles A. Rathbm.
    
   Pee Cubiam.

Por the reasons stated in the opinion delivered at the present term in the case of State, ex rel. O’Reardon, v. C. Franklin Wilson, Judge, &c., the allowance of the peremptory writs asked for by the respective relators will be denied.