Case ID: ny_219/html/0550-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James C. De Groff, Respondent, v. Antonio Pansini et al., Appellants.
    Reported below, 173 App. Div. 905.
    (Argued October 2, 1916;
    decided October 10, 1916.)
    Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 20, 1916, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to foreclose a mortgage.
    The motion was made upon the grounds that the Appellate Division had unanimously decided that the findings of fact were supported by the evidence; that the exceptions were frivolous; that the record presented no question for review, and that the appeal was taken solely' for purpose of delay.
    
      Frederick S. Martyn for motion.
    
      Lynn O. Norris opposed.
   Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.