Case ID: nj_28/html/0217-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam:.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN THE MATTER OF LOUIS J. MILLER, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.
    Argued November 3, 1958
    Decided November 17, 1958.
    
      Mr. Thomas J. Brogan for the order.
    
      Mr. Joseph MeliTlo for the respondent.
   Pee Curiam:.

The respondent freely admits his violation of the Canons of Ethics. The Hudson County Ethics and Grievance Committee unanimously recommended no discipline beyond reprimand. Under the unusual circumstances of this case we concur in the recommendation of the committee and accordingly the respondent is hereby reprimanded.

Guilty and for reprimand—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Heher, Burling, Jacobs, Eeancis and Proctor—6.

Not guilty—Justice Waoi-ieneeld—1.