Case ID: sw3d_165/html/0596-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David FITZPATRICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 64187.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    July 5, 2005.
    Ruth Sanders, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
    Deborah Daniels, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before EDWIN H. SMITH, C.J., ROBERT G. ULRICH and JAMES M. SMART, JR., JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Fitzpatrick appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. In his sole point on appeal, Mr. Fitzpatrick contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel failed to depose two witnesses before trial.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).