Case ID: ad2d_297/html/0818-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dwayne Baldwin, Also Known as Dewayne Baldwin, Appellant.
    [747 NYS2d 810]
   The prosecution advanced sufficient race-neutral explanations for exercising peremptory challenges against the prospective jurors in question (see People v Payne, 88 NY2d 172, 183; People v Allen, 86 NY2d 101). The defendant failed to satisfy his burden of proving that the explanations given by the prosecutor were pretextual (see People v Payne, supra; People v White, 289 AD2d 270; see generally Hernandez v New York, 500 US 352, 364-365). Accordingly, the trial court properly denied the defendant’s Batson challenge (see Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). S. Miller, J.P., Crane, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.