Case ID: so2d_347/html/1023-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edward LILLIS, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 50186.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    June 30, 1977.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Thomas G. Murray, Asst. Public Defender, for petitioner.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen, and Sidney M. Pertnoy and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON; C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.