Case ID: f-appx_467/html/0344-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guadalupe CRUZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 11-40077
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    June 19, 2012.
    Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Jose Salvador Tellez, II, Esq., Law Office of Jose Salvador Tellez II, P.C., Laredo, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Guadalupe Cruz-Garcia, Manchester, KY, pro se.
    Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Guadalupe Cruz-Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Cruz-Garcia has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Cruz-Garcia’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Cruz-Garcia’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.