Case ID: sw2d_862/html/0518-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rudy T. CORTINAS, Claimant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Employer.
    No. 63805.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Oct. 12, 1993.
    James F. Koester, St. Louis, for claimant.
    Harlan & Harlan, Brian J. Dean, St. Louis, for employer.
    Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Rudy T. Cortinas, appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his claim for Workers’ Compensation Benefits.

The order of the administrative agency is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value.

The order of the administrative agency is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).