Case ID: ga_108/html/0771-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Little, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Johnson v. The State.
    Submitted March 6,
    Decided March 15, 1899.
    Indictment for gaming. Before Judge Nottingham. City court of Macon. January 25, 1899.
    
      Hardeman & Moore and M. G. Bayne, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Robert Hodges, solicitor-general, contra.
   Little, J.

The necessary absence, in attendance on a superior court, of an attorney who represented the accused being tried in a city court, is no ground for continuance of the latter case, when it appears that the leading counsel of the accused on trial in the city court was present and conducted the defense. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices con,carring.