Case ID: or-app_66/html/0760-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted January 18,
    reversed and remanded; affirmed on cross-appeal February 1, 1984
    LADUM, Appellant - Cross-Respondent, v. MOORE, Respondent - Cross-Appellant.
    
    ([ AXXXX-XXXXX ]; CA A28127)
    675 P2d 515
    E. J. Simmons, Portland, argued the cause for appellant - cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Rosenbaum & Simmons, Portland.
    Marshall L. Amiton, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent - cross-appellant.
    Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

In this action on four promissory notes, plaintiff, as the prevailing party, was entitled to an award of an attorney fee. See Carlson v. Blumenstein, 293 Or 494, 651 P2d 710 (1982); Illingworth v. Bushong, 61 Or App 152, 656 P2d 370 (1982).

Reversed and remanded for determination of an appropriate award of attorney fees to plaintiff; affirmed as to cross-appeal.