Case ID: okla-crim_15/html/0695-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. H. COOK et al. v. STATE.
    No. A-3188.
    Opinion Filed April 17, 1919.
    (179 Pac. 624.)
    Appeal from District Court, Garfield County; J. C. Robberts, Judge.
    J. H. Cook and E. J. Brown were convicted of a felony, and they appeal.
    Reversed.
    E. C. Patton, for plaintiffs in error.
    The Attorney General and W. C. Hall, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs in error, J. H. Cook and E. J. Brown,, were jointly tried and convicted in the district'court of Garfield county of keeping a place in the city of Enid with the felonious intent and purpose of selling intoxicating liquor. To reverse the judgments rendered on the verdict, they appealed-.

In the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, the-statute upon which this proescution is based was held unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgments are reversed.