Case ID: sw3d_153/html/0350-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Paul DAY, Appellant Pro Se, v. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DIVISION OF the BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, and, Fannie Gaw, Member Division of Board of Probation and Parole, Respondents.
    No. WD 63650.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Jan. 25, 2005.
    Paul Day, Jefferson City, pro se.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Deborah Daniels, Office of Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.
    Before RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Presiding Judge, PATRICIA A. BRECKENRIDGE, Judge, and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge.
   ORDER

Paul Day and his parents brought a declaratory judgment action alleging that Day was entitled to a new parole hearing and that he was improperly denied jail time credit by the Missouri Department of Corrections. The circuit court granted summary judgment to the defendants and the Days appeal. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).