Case ID: ny_222/html/0602-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Morris R. Horovitz, Appellant, v. Joseph J. Lack, Respondent.
    
      Horovitz v. Lack, 169 App. Div. 962, affirmed.
    (Submitted December 7, 1917;
    decided December 21, 1917.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 15, 1915, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict. The action was brought to recover the sum of $900 alleged to have been procured by the defendant from the plaintiff by false and fraudulent representations. It was alleged that in a transaction relating to an exchange of real estate between this plaintiff and one Gumberg, this defendant was one of the brokers who brought about the transaction; that'the defendant falsely and fraudulently represented that he, the defendant, would be compelled to pay that sum to Gumberg’s wife as a considerations for having her join in a deed with her husband to the plaintiff; that induced by such representations . and relying thereupon, the plaintiff gave to the defendant his check for $900 for that purpose; that the representations were false and untrue and that the moneys were never paid over to the wife of Gumberg but were retained by the defendant. The answer was a general denial.
    
      Bernard I. Kamen and Frederick R. Ryan for appellant.
    
      Hugo Hirsh, Emanuel Newman and Benjamin Reass for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Hogan, Pound, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.