Case ID: f-appx_306/html/0059-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jason BOWEN, Petitioner-Appellant v. Constance REESE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 08-60022
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Jan. 5, 2009.
    Jason Bowen, Yazoo City, MS, pro se.
    
      Before HIGGIBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Jason Bowen, federal prisoner # 09907-031, appeals the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Bowen alleged that he was subjected to and engaged in sexual activity with Tennessee prison officials and that drugs were planted in his cubicle. Bowen asserted that as a result of these incidents, he was confined in a special housing unit and subsequently was transferred to a prison in Mississippi. Bowen contends that because he is asserting that he is incarcerated in the wrong prison, § 2241 is the proper vehicle for his claims.

Because a favorable determination would not automatically entitle Bowen to accelerated release from custody, his claims do not arise under § 2241. See Carson v. Johnson, 112 F.3d 818, 820-21 (5th Cir.1997). Claims that have no relation to a prisoner’s ultimate date of release from custody are not grounds for habeas relief. Malehi v. Thaler, 211 F.3d 953, 958-59 (5th Cir.2000). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in '5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.