Case ID: us_180/html/0126-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Harlan", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NEELY v. HENKEL
    (No. 2).
    APPEAL FROM- THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.
    No. 406.
    Argued, December 10,11,1900.
    Decided January 14, 1901.
    The decision in this case follows that in No. 387, ante, 109.
    This case was argued with No. 387, ante, 109, by the same counsel.
   Mr. Justice Harlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

The record in this case, it is admitted, shows the same state of facts as in the case just decided. .This was a second application. for a writ of habeas corpus, upon substantially the same grounds as were urged in the other case. The additional allegations in this application for the writ did not materially change the situation.

Eor the reasons stated in the opinion just delivered, the judgment of the Circuit Court is-

Affirmed,