Case ID: so2d_770/html/1291-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D00-2035.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 29, 2000.
    Charles Moore, in proper person.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Paulette R. Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and SORONDO, JJ.
   CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Charles Moore challenges the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief upon the grounds that the motion was untimely. The state properly concedes that the motion was timely filed within two years of the date of the mandate in his direct appeal. See Huff v. State, 569 So.2d 1247 (Fla.1990). Accordingly, the denial of the motion is reversed and remanded for consideration of the merits of Moore’s claim.