Case ID: neb_235/html/0551-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Arthur D. Skalak and Bernice M. Skalak, appellees, v. James J. Walker and Ruth Ann Walker, appellants.
    456 N.W.2d 109
    Filed June 8, 1990.
    No.88-159.
    Robert V. Dwyer, Jr., and Richard D. Cimino, of Dwyer, Pohren, Wood, Heavey & Grimm, for appellants.
    Richard E Norris for appellees.
    Hastings, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, andFAHRNBRUCH, JJ.
   Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and recommendation of the Appellate Division of the District Court, we find that the evidence supports a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for misrepresentation, but that because of a failure of proof and error of law, the judgment of the district court is reversed with directions to reverse and remand the cause to the county court for a new trial on the issue of damages.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial on the issue of damages .