Case ID: f-appx_241/html/0956-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Timothy E. GREEN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SUMTER COURT; Tuomey Hospital; Harry Lea Kirby; Housing Authority; Social Security; Congress; Freedom Housing; Health Care Department; Water Department; Vocational Rehabilitation, Defendants—Appellees, and Alfred Quimet; Robert McCabe; Motor Vehicle; Hearing Freedom Housing; TB Drug and Alcohol; TB Health Care Department; HE Bill Vocational Rehabilitation; Education; Overpayment Back Payment; Legal Rights, Defendants.
    No. 07-1735.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 11, 2007.
    Decided: Sept. 13, 2007.
    Timothy E. Green, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Timothy E. Green seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate and dismissing without prejudice his pro se civil action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Green seeks to appeal is not an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.