Case ID: ny_207/html/0773-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Abraham H. Baraschick, Respondent, v. Leo Ritter et al., Appellants.
    Reported below, 153 App. Div. 899.
    (Submitted March 10, 1913;
    decided March 18, 1913.)
    Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 22, 1912, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract.
    The motion was made upon the grounds that the action was one to recover for breach of a contract specified in subdivision 2 of section 191 of the Code of Civil Procedure; that the decision of the Appellate Division was unanimous; that permission to appeal had not been obtained; that no question of law was involved, and that the exceptions were frivolous,
    
      
      Otto A. Samuels for motion.
    
      Joseph Gans opposed.
   Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.