Case ID: nh_75/html/0607-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hillsborough,
    May 3, 1910.
    Poleti v. Poleti.
    Libel bob Divobce. Trial by the court and decree for the plaintiff. Transferred from the September term, 1909, of the superior court by Pike, J., on the defendant’s exception to the refusal of the court to dissolve an attachment of his property.
    
      Kittredge £ Prescott and Taggart, Tuttle, Burroughs Wyman, for the plaintiff.
    
      Doyle ¿- Bader, for the defendant.
   Per Curiam.

If the court might have ordered the plaintiff to release the attachment as the price of the decree in her favor, it did not do so. The court’s refusal to make such order is a finding that it ought not to be made.

Exception overruled.