Case ID: f-appx_140/html/0181-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Linda L. HIOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 05-11426
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    July 14, 2005.
    Thomas A. Nash, Jr., Inglesby Falligant Horne, et al., Savannah, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Albert J. Decusati, McLain & Merritt, P.C., Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before BIRCH, BARKETT and COX, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Linda L. Hiott appeals the judgment of the district court, arguing that the district court erred in granting Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment. We agree with the district court that even if we assume the stacked pictures that injured Plaintiff presented a hazard, there is no evidence that the Defendant had superior knowledge of the hazard. See Metts v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 269 Ga.App. 366, 604 S.E.2d 235, 237 (2004); Foodmax v. Fleming, 219 Ga.App. 469, 465 S.E.2d 489, 490 (1995). The judgment of the district court is, therefore,

AFFIRMED.