Case ID: f-appx_594/html/0139-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Julia E. SOUTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF WARREN, a Political Subdivision of Virginia; Warren County Board of Supervisors; Blair Mitchell, Warren County Attorney; Dan Whitten, Assistant Warren County Attorney; Erik Moore, Warren County Zoning Administrator; Douglas Stanley, Warren County Executive/Administrator, Defendants-Appel-lees, and John Kulnis, Warren County Zoning Administrator, Defendant.
    No. 14-2034.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 12, 2015.
    Decided: Feb. 18, 2015.
    Julia E. Souter, Appellant Pro Se. Heather Kathleen Bardot, Julia Bougie Judkins, Bancroft, Megavin, Horvath & Judkins, PC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appel-lees.
    Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Julia E. Souter appeals the district court’s order denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion seeking relief from the district court’s orders dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action and denying her motion to amend the court’s judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Souter v. Cnty. of Warren, No. 5:13-cv-00061-MFU-JGW (WD.Va. Aug. 28, 2014). We deny Souter’s motion to appoint counsel, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.