Case ID: so2d_464/html/1304-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ALRODO CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. CARL SCHEFFER-KLUTE GMBH & CO., a West German corporation, Appellee.
    No. 83-2108.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 12, 1985.
    Fine, Jacobson, Block, England, Klein, Colan & Simon, Miami, for appellant.
    Blackwell, Walker, Gray, Powers, Flick & Hoehl and Diane H. Tutt, Miami, for appellee.
    Before HENDRY, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The trial court found that appellee breached an exclusive sales agreement, but that (1) no profit losses could be attributed to the breach because appellant had no profit history and its alleged damages were thus too speculative, and (2) the breach did not absolve appellant of liability for an indebtedness incurred prior to the breach. The court’s findings and conclusions will not be disturbed on either the main appeal or the cross-appeal because they are supported by competent substantial evidence. Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Affirmed.