Case ID: sw_244/html/0381-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HAWKINS, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HOWELL v. STATE.
    (No. 7272.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Oct. 18, 1922.)
    Criminal law <®=>l 144(17)— Presumption in favor of judgment in absence of bill of exceptions.
    In the absence of a statement of facts and bills of exception, everything will be presumed in favor of the validity of the judgment.
    Appeal from District Court, Cass County; Hugh Carney, Judge.
    Joe Howell was convicted for selling intoxicating liquor, and be appeals.
    Affirmed.
    R. G. Storey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for selling intoxicating liquor. Punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

In the absence of a statement of facts and bills of exception, we must presume everything in favor of the validity of the judgment.

The same will be affirmed. 
      other cases see same-topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes