Case ID: ohio-app_118/html/0368-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Duffy, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Wetzel, Appellant.
    (No. 7414
    Decided August 13, 1963.)
    
      Mr. John G. Young, city attorney, Mr. Howard P. Lowe and Mr. Gordon L. Sroufe, for appellee.
    
      Mr. James C. Britt, Mr. Willis E. Wolfe, Jr., and Mr. Joseph G. Rotondo, for appellant.
   Duffy, P. J.

The state of Ohio has filed a motion asking for a dismissal of this appeal for the reason that the order for which the defendant, appellant herein, has attempted to appeal is not a final or appealable order, and that jurisdiction has not as yet been conferred on this court. The appeal has been taken from the overruling of a motion to suppress evidence.

The defendant-appellant has not answered the motion, but it appears that the order appealed from is not a final or appeal-able order. See Section 2953.02 of the Revised Code and State v. Holbrook, 105 Ohio App., 414.

The motion to dismiss will be, and hereby is, sustained, and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings according to law.

Motion sustained.

Bryant and Troop, JJ., concur.