Case ID: f-appx_382/html/0543-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MEMORANDUM \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anastacio GALVAN-FELIX, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 09-70008.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted May 25, 2010.
    
    Filed June 3, 2010.
    Anastacio Galvan-Felix, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
    
      Andrew Nathan O’Malley, Trial, OIL, Ernesto Horacio Molina, Jr., Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Le-Fevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
    Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Anastacio Galvan-Felix a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denying his motion to reconsider the underlying denial of his application for cancellation of relief based on his failure to establish the requisite hardship to a qualifying relative. The BIA denied the motion as untimely.

Galvan-Felix contends that the BIA erred by not finding exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his United States citizen wife. Galvan-Felix also contends that his due process rights were violated.

Galvan-Felix has not raised any challenges to the BIA’s denial of his motion to reconsider as untimely, and therefore he has waived any challenge to that decision. See Martinez-Serrano v. I.N.S., 94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir.1996) (issues not supported by argument in a brief are deemed abandoned).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.