Case ID: ny_51/html/0641-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Lott, Ch. C.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William Peck, Respondent, v. Christopher Winne et al., Appellants.
    (Submitted May 22,1872;
    decided September term, 1872.)
    This action was upon a promissory note. Most of the questions raised were disposed of upon the facts of the case.
    To show a consideration for the note, plaintiff proved various items of account and claims against defendant Yan Voorhis, to settle which it was claimed the note was given. Defendants gave evidence tending to show that some of these items hadbeen paid by counter items of account. Plaintiff for the purpose of extinguishing these counter items offered evidence of certain other claims against defendant Van Voorhis. , This was objected to, that no such claims were set up in the complaint, and as immaterial and incompetent. The evidence was received. Held, no error; that the evidence was competent for the purpose for which it was offered.
    
      Quincy Van Voorhis for the appellants.
    
      William H. Smith for the respondent.
   Lott, Ch. C.,

reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.