Case ID: nj-eq_93/html/0255-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George M. LaMonte, as commissioner, &c., appellant, v. Edward D. Dunn, respondent.
    [Decided October 18th, 1921.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevens, whose opinion is reported ante p. ®£9.
    
    
      Mr. Roger Hinds, for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. CoTlim & Corbin, for the respondent-
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenoi-iaed, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaltsci-i, Black, Iyatzenbach, Heppbnhbimeb, Williams, Gardner — 12.

For reversal — None.