Case ID: pa_635/html/0663-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

139 A.3d 1257
    CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Respondent v. FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, FORT PITT LODGE NO. 1, Petitioner.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    June 20, 2016.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

(1) Whether a home rule municipality may amend its home rule charter to eliminate mandatory subjects of bargaining as defined by Act 111 of 1968, the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Act and applicable case law?
(2) Whether a municipality’s home rule charter provision eliminating a mandatory subject of bargaining for its police officers is pre-empted by Act 111 of 1968?