Case ID: njl_76/html/0828-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JAMES W. McCARTHY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. JOHN W. QUEEN, DEFENDANT IN ERROR. EDWARD FRY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. ROBERT DAVIS, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    Argued July 2, 1908
    Decided March 1, 1909.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported ante p. 144.
    For the plaintiffs in error, Merritt Lane.
    
    For the defendants in error, Warren Dixon, William D. Edwards and Charles L. Corbin.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgments under review in these two cases will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Eeed, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dill, J.J. 13.

For reversal—None.