Case ID: so2d_597/html/0987-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. ANSTEAD, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jean E. GEFFRARD a/k/a Jean Peter, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Appellee.
    No. 91-1370.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 27, 1992.
    Kenneth M. Malnik of Larry S. Davis, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant.
    Sondra R. Schwartz, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We dismiss this appeal as the order sought to be reviewed is a nonfinal, nonap-pealable order.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and POLEN, J., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with opinion.

ANSTEAD, Judge,

concurring specially.

I would not dismiss the appeal, but would affirm the order on review. I disagree that we lack jurisdiction to review a juvenile dependency review order that provides for custody of the appellant’s child to remain with the state. See In Interest of M.A., 593 So.2d 521 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). However, I find no prejudicial error has been demonstrated on appeal.