Case ID: so2d_223/html/0545-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HOLLYWOOD BANK & TRUST COMPANY and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Petitioners, v. Helen Rose MROFCZA, Respondent.
    No. 38526.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    May 28, 1969.
    Rehearing Denied June 20,1969.
    Charles Desmond Crowley, Fort Lauder-dale, for petitioners.
    Edward Schroll, Miami, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 14, 1969.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is, therefore, dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, ,denied.

Respondent’s petition for attorney’s fees is granted in the sum of $250.00.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.