Case ID: sw3d_270/html/0520-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Scottie CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 68704.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Dec. 9, 2008.
    S. Kate Webber, Esq., Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, Esq., and Richard A. Starnes, Esq., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before DIVIV: HOWARD, C.J., LOWENSTEIN and SMART, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial after eviden-tiary hearing of his Rule 24.035 motion. His one point on appeal, that plea counsel said there was a “good chance” he would receive a lighter sentence, is without merit. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).