Case ID: f-appx_228/html/0260-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William P. HALEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W. Randolph NICHOLS, Superintendent, Chesapeake Public Schools, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 06-2256.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 31, 2007.
    Decided: June 4, 2007.
    William P. Haley, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jon Barry, David John Sullivan, Kaufman & Cañóles, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

William P. Haley appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Haley v. Nichols, No. 2:06-cv-00361-RAJ (E.D. Va. Oct. 4 & 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.