Case ID: sw3d_18/html/0736-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re William ROBERTS.
    
    No. 04-00-00129-CV.
    Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio.
    March 8, 2000.
    Tomas Ramirez, III, Law Office of Tomas Ramirez III, Devine, George W. Baugh, San Antonio, for appellant.
    Kristen L. Calvert, George Carroll, Susan D. Reed, Criminal Dist. Atty., San Antonio, for appellee.
    Sitting: ALMA L. LÓPEZ, Justice, PAUL W. GREEN, Justice, KAREN ANGELINI, Justice.
    
      
      . William Roberts is a child who is the subject of a Suit Affecting the Parent-Child Relationship brought by the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services.
    
   OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The court has considered the relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and the relator’s motion for emergency relief, and is of the opinion that relief should be denied because the trial court’s ruling on a motion to show authority can be remedied by appeal. See State Board of Insurance v. Williams, 736 S.W.2d 259, 260 (Tex.App.—Austin 1987, no writ) (denying mandamus relief because error in ruling on motion to show authority could be remedied by appeal). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and request for temporary relief are denied. Relator shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding.