Case ID: f2d_356/html/0515-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America v. Stanley HUBERMAN, Appellant.
    No. 15570.
    United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
    Argued Feb. 10, 1966.
    Decided March 2, 1966.
    G. Fred DiBona, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
    Francis R. Crumlish, Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa. (Drew J. T. O’Keefe, U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
    Before McLAUGHLIN, FORMAN and GANEY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

We think that appellant’s filing of his notice of appeal was timely under the facts before us. O’Neal v. United States, 272 F.2d 412 (5 Cir. 1943).

Regarding the merits, we find that there is no error of substance in the trial record.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.