Case ID: njl_101/html/0570-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOHN TRICOLO, RESPONDENT, v. DONATO CENTALANZA AND RAFFAELE CENTALANZA, APPELLANTS.
    Argued March 20, 1925
    Decided May 18, 1925.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 100 N. J. L. 231.
    ■ Por the appellants, Thomas Brunetto.
    
    Por the respondent, Gaetano Belfaito.
    
   Per Curiam.

Our examination of this case has led up to the conclusion that a right result was reached in the court below upon the facts, and, therefore, the judgment under review herein should be affirmed.

For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.