Case ID: so2d_661/html/1311-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nakia Shae HUGGINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 95-1801.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 1, 1995.
    Nakia Shae Huggins, in pro. per.
    
      Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the order denying the appellant’s 3.850 motion, except that we find that the three-year minimum-mandatory sentences as to Counts II and III are to be served concurrent to each other and consecutive to Count I, and do hereby modify said sentences in this regard. In all other respects the order under review is affirmed.

Affirmed as modified.