Case ID: ny-2d_94/html/0887-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[727 NE2d 573, 706 NYS2d 76]
    Amy Zambrana, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.
    Argued January 5, 2000;
    decided February 17, 2000
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Proner & Proner, New York City (Tobi R. Salottolo of counsel), for appellant.
    
      McCabe, Collins, McGeough & Fowler, Mineola (Patrick M. Murphy of counsel), for respondents.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the majority memorandum of the Appellate Division. We further note that plaintiff failed to identify any triable issue of fact with respect to whether defendant had notice of the reckless conduct of other skaters in order to defeat defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.