Case ID: sw2d_97/html/0954-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "CHRISTIAN, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

KING v. STATE (two cases).
    Nos. 18516, 18517.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Nov. 4, 1936.
    W. H. Scott, of Houston, for appellant.
    Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.
   CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is establishing a lottery; the punishment, a fine of $100.

We find in the transcript a statement by the clerk of the trial court, as follows

“Defendant not in custody.
“Defendant not under recognizance.
“Defendant not under appeal bond.”

Under all of the authorities this court is. without jurisdiction. See Grant v. State,. 110 Tex.Cr.R. 9, 7 S.W.(2d) 90.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals, and approved by the court.