Case ID: haw_51/html/0039-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SARAH L. JOHNSON AND CLARENCE R. JOHNSON v. TATSUMI TSUKAHARA
    No. 4694.
    January 20, 1969.
    Richardson, C.J., Marumoto and Abe, JJ.
    
      Albert Could (Cobb & Could of counsel) for the petition.
   Per Curiam.

Rehearing is denied without argument. Since the filing of the opinion in this case, two justices who participated in the decision have retired. But, three justices, constituting a majority, remain. None of the three justices who remain has requested a reply under Rule 5 of the rules of this court. Rehearing will not be ordered merely on the ground that there has been a change in the court. Yoshizaki v. Hilo Hospital, 50 Haw. 40, 429 P.2d 829 (1968).