Case ID: so2d_696/html/0397-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

TRAVEL ACCESS, INC., Appellant, v. SYSTEM ONE DIRECT ACCESS, INC., Appellee.
    No. 97-398.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 11, 1997.
    Rehearing Denied July 23, 1997.
    Sehoeppl & Burke and Carl F. Sehoeppl, Boca Raton, for appellant.
    Zarco & Pardo and Robert Zarco and Robert M. Einhorn and Omar J. Arcia, Miami, for appellee.
    Before NESBITT, LEVY and GREEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

In view of the fact that the record reveals disputed issues of material fact, particularly relating to the question of whether the contract at issue had become a month-to-month agreement, as well as the unresolved issues relating to the affirmative defenses of the appellant, it was error for the trial court to have granted the appellee’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Accordingly, the said judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith,

Reversed.