Case ID: sw3d_555/html/0478-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David HAIGHT, et ux., Respondents, v. DRIVETIME CAR SALES COMPANY, LLC d/b/a DriveTime, Appellant.
    WD 81164
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    ORDER FILED: May 29, 2018 Motion for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 3, 2018 Application for Transfer Denied September 25, 2018
    Bryce B. Bell and Mark W. Schmitz, Kansas City, MO, Attorneys for Respondents.
    Brian A. Jackson, Michael J. Cappo, and Molly S. Carella, Kansas City, MO, Attorneys for Appellant.
    Before Division IV: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Chief Judge, and Gary D. Witt and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judges
    Order
   Per Curiam:

DriveTime Car Sales Company, LLC appeals from the ruling of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, denying its motion to compel David and Gifty Haight to arbitrate their claims against DriveTime for malicious prosecution, abuse of process, and violation of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The Circuit Court's ruling is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).