Case ID: ny-st-rep_69/html/0781-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mark H. Eisner, Resp’t, v. Joseph Stern, as Executor, etc., App’lt.
    
      (Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,
    
    
      Filed October 18, 1895.)
    
    Appeal from an order, denying a motion to direct the defendant to make his answer more definite and certain.
    
      George W. Carr, for app’lt; Steinhardt & Goldman, for resp’t.
   Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in the case of Eisner v. Eisner (herewith banded down) 69 St. Rep. 779, the order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.