Case ID: nj-eq_98/html/0706-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William C. Clough et al., respondents, v. Samuel J. Mesnick et al., appellants.
    [Argued May term, 1925.
    Decided October 19th, 1925.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, whose opinion is reported in 96 N. J. Eq. 482.
    
    
      Messrs. Weinberger & Weinberger, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. Henry G. Whitehead, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.