Case ID: so2d_556/html/1126-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Terrance ROGERS, Appellee.
    No. 89-588.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Nov. 8, 1989.
    Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied March 14, 1990.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Alfonso M. Saldana, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing because in sentencing appellee the trial court relied on the guidelines in effect at the time of the sentence as opposed to those in effect at the time of the commission of the crime. State v. Williams, 546 So.2d 809 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

We reject appellant’s challenge to the constitutionality of the statute under which he was convicted because he did not raise it in the trial court when he pled no contest and did not raise the issue below. Furthermore, the constitutionality of the statute has been upheld. State v. Burch, 545 So.2d 279 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WARNER, JJ., concur.