Case ID: ny_193/html/0619-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael J. Ford, Respondent, v. Adams Dry Goods Company, Appellant.
    
      Ford v. Adams Dry Goods Co., 131 App, Div. 895, affirmed.
    (Argued October 7, 1908;
    decided October 23, 1908.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered August 3, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been received through defendant’s negligence.
    
      Frederick E. Fishel for appellant.
    
      Maurice L. Reidenheimer, Emanuel vam, Dernoot and Louis J. Vorhaus for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Edward T. Bartlett, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Cullen, Oh. J., Haight and Werner, JJ.