Case ID: sw2d_823/html/0047-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richmond C. COBURN, et al., Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. Cesar A. DUNKEL, Individually and as alter ego of Infocast, Inc., Defendants/ Appellants.
    No. 59703.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Oct. 29, 1991.
    Cesar A. Dunkel, pro se.
    Coburn, Croft & Putzell, Charles Wayne Primm, St. Louis, for plaintiffs, respondents.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Cesar A. Dunkel appeals from a jury verdict and judgment for plaintiffs on their claim for attorneys’ fees. The judgment was entered against Cesar A. Dunkel, individually, on a breach of contract claim and against Infocast, Inc., and Cesar A. Dunkel, as alter ego of Infocast, Inc., on claims of quantum merit. The corporation is not a party to this appeal. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would not have precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).