Case ID: sw3d_266/html/0333-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Arthur A. SMITH, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 90639.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Oct. 14, 2008.
    Nancy A. McKerrow, Ellen H. Flottman, co-counsel, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, Cory Lee Atkins, co-counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K HOFF, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Arthur Smith appeals the trial court’s conviction on two counts of second-degree domestic assault (§ 565.073). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No prece-dential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).