Case ID: f-appx_647/html/0396-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ernest D. NEWMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE; Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division; Chaplain Martin, Chaplain of the Powledge Unit; Warden Whiet, Warden of the Powledge Unit; Assistant Warden Ault, Assistant Warden of the Powledge Unit, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 14-20495
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    April 29, 2016.
    Ernest D. Newman, Livingston, TX, pro se.
    Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Ernest D. Newman, Texas prisoner # 1892170, appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as barred by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Newman argues that the dismissal was improper because he was not proceeding in forma pauperis (IFP).

Newman does not challenge the district court’s determination that he is subject to the § 1915(g) bar, and the record reflects that Newman never paid the filing fee in the district court. Because Newman is subject to the § 1915(g) bar, he may not proceed IFP without showing that his “is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” § 1915(g).' Newman has failed to make that showing. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm. R. 47.5.4.