Case ID: so2d_182/html/0421-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Monserrate Albin RODRIGUEZ, as surviving spouse of Dolores Rodriguez, deceased, etc., Petitioner, v. The HOUSTON CORPORATION, a nonresident corporation, Respondent. Monserrate Albin RODRIGUEZ, as surviving spouse of Dolores Rodriguez, deceased, etc., Petitioner, v. 76TH STREET CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Respondent.
    Nos. 33937, 33937-A.
    Supreme Court of Florida
    Sept. 8, 1965.
    Rehearing Denied Feb. 28, 1966.
    Paul A. Louis, Bertha Claire Lee and Sinclair, Barfield & Louis, Miami, for petitioner.
    S. O. Carson, John H. Wahl, Jr., and Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Atkins, Carson & Wahl, Miami, for The Houston Corporation.
    Dixon, Dejarnette, Bradford, Williams, McKay & Kimbrell and James A. Dixon, Jr., Miami, for 76th Street Corporation.
   PER CURIAM.

The petition for certiorari initially suggested a jurisdictional conflict of decisions. Rodriguez et al. v. Houston Corp. et al., Fla.App., 167 So.2d 746. We granted the writ but set the matter for hearing on both jurisdiction and merits.

We have heard oral arguments and have carefully examined the decision under review, together with the briefs and supporting record. We have now concluded that a jurisdictional conflict is not present, so the writ must be discharged as having been improvidently issued.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., THOMAS, ROBERTS and DREW, JJ., and KING, Circuit Judge, concur.