Case ID: ga-app_31/html/0292-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Luke, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

14775.
    Bailey v. Gardner.
    Decided December 5, 1923.
   Luke, J.

1. The evidence was conflicting, and the judgment will not be reversed upon the general grounds of the motion for a new trial.

2. The grounds of the motion for a new trial complaining of alleged errors in the introduction of evidence, in the court’s charge, and of the failure to- charge, contain no reversible error.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworih, J., concur.

Action for damages; from Gordon superior court—Judge Tarver. May 12, 1923.

Albert Kemper, A. L. Henson, for plaintiff.

J. G. B. Brwin, for defendant.