Case ID: ny-super-ct_51/html/0531-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE AMERICAN SURETY Co. for a Rule, &c.
    
      Decided February 2, 1885.
    Before Sedgwick, Van Vorst and Freedman, JJ.
    
      Elihu Root, for the application.
   Per Curiam.

The rule asked is substantially a repetition of the statute on the subject, and this statute has now been so often construed in cases reported, that a rule is not needed for the practical application of the statute. If there should be, the opinion of the court being that there is not anything in a rule of the kind which might be intended to direct what the court at special, term should do in each particular litigation, such a rule would contravene the statute which intends that each application shall be passed upon on its own merits after hearing both sides.

The application should be denied.