Case ID: njl_110/html/0026-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. MAX BARNETT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued October 28, 1932
    Decided January 23, 1933.
    Bor the defendant in error, Louis A. Repetto.
    
    Bor the plaintiff in error, Cole ■& Cole.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court, and reported in 109 N. J. L. 193.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Kays, Hetfield, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.