Case ID: pa-super_223/html/0722-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam :", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Commonwealth v. St. Clair, Appellant.
    Argued September 11,1972.
    
      Barry Simon, with him J. Pennington Straus, and Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, for appellant;
    
      James T. Ranney, Assistant District Attorney, with him James D. Crawford, Deputy District Attorney, Richard A. Sprague, First Assistant District Attorney, and Arlen Specter, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
   Opinion

Per Curiam :

This is ail appeal from a conviction and sentence on charges of burglary and aggravated robbery. From a review of the record we conclude that appellant’s waiver of a jury was valid. However, the court below refused consideration of appellant’s petition for reconsideration of sentence, under the mistaken belief that the petition had not been filed in time.

Reversed and remanded for consideration, on the merits, of appellant’s petition for reconsideration of sentence.