Case ID: cust-ct_4/html/0628-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dallinger, Judge:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Osaki Shoten, Ltd., et al. v. United States
    No. 4725.
    Entry Nos. 1663, A-319, etc.
    Invoices dated Kobe, Japan, December 9, 1934, etc.
    Certified December 10, 1934, etc.
    Entered at Honolulu, T. H., December 19, 1934, Hilo, T. H., May 26, 1937, etc.
    
      (Decided February 8, ,1940)
    
      Lawrence & Tuttle (George B. Tuttle of counsel) for the plaintiffs.
    
      Webster J. Oliver, Assistant Attorney General (Daniel I. Auster, special attorney), for the defendant.
   Dallinger, Judge:

The appeals to reappraisement, listed in schedule A, attached to my decision herein and made a part hereof, have been stipulated and submitted for decision by counsel for the parties hereto.

In harmony with the stipulation, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the merchandise involved herein, the invoiced descriptions of which are marked A on the invoices and initialed by the respective examiners, and that such values are the unit invoiced values, plus packing and cases as invoiced, there being no higher foreign value.

As to all other merchandise I find the values to be the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.