Case ID: misc3d_15/html/0796-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "W. Patrick Falvey, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[832 NYS2d 797]
    Asset Acceptance, LLC, as Assignee of Citibank USA, N.A., Plaintiff, v Wendy Sisson, Defendant.
    Supreme Court, Yates County,
    March 22, 2007
    APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      LeSchack & Grodensky, P.C. (Dean R. Brown of counsel), for plaintiff. Wendy Sisson, defendant pro se.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

W. Patrick Falvey, J.

This is a special proceeding to confirm the award of an arbitrator pursuant to CPLR 7510. The matter was made returnable before this court on March 13, 2007. Neither party appeared, and the court denied the petition on the record, and herein makes this decision in support of said order of denial.

The arbitrator made his decision awarding the petitioner $2,872.80 and pursuant to CPLR 7507 mailed a copy of same to the parties on December 14, 2005, by first class mail, postage prepaid, as shown by the “Acknowledgment and Certificate of Service” (exhibit B of the petition).

The contract between the parties called for binding arbitration (exhibit A of the petition).

The petitioner states that the petition is being brought within one year of the award and the award has not been vacated or modified pursuant to CPLR 7511. Petitioner’s petition provides copies of the arbitration clause in the credit card agreement (exhibit A) and the award (exhibit B).

Petitioner failed to provide proof that the respondent was personally served with the notice of petition and petition; nor did it provide the court with a copy of the notice of arbitration required under CPLR 7506 (b).

Of great concern to the court is the filing of the notice of petition and petition within one year of the award. (CPLR 7510.) Here, the award was served on the parties on December 14, 2005. The notice of petition and petition were filed January 11, 2007. However, the petitioner failed to provide proof to the court that it did not receive notice of the award until on or after January 11, 2006, being one year prior to the filing of the notice of petition and petition.

Andrew Garrett Holding Corp v Singer (NYLJ, Feb. 9, 2005, at 18, col 1 [Sup Ct, NY County, Goodman, J.]), is instructive as it involves an attorney malpractice action arising from a law firm’s alleged failure to confirm an arbitration award. Professor Siegel in New York Practice § 601 (2006 Pocket Part [4th ed]) notes that missing the one-year requirement of CPLR 7510 is a statute of limitations in that it can result in forfeiture of the entire award. The Andrew Garrett case illustrates that if the lawyer for the winner of the award fails to secure confirmation within one year, that lawyer can be sued for legal malpractice.

Therefore, based on the foregoing, the petition is denied, with prejudice.