Case ID: fla_146/html/0023-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. A. Hornsby, Appellant, v. State, Appellee.
    200 So. 541
    En Banc
    Opinion Filed February 4, 1941
    Rehearing Denied March 6, 1941
    
      Douglas & Schad, for Appellant;
    
      George Couper Gibbs, Attorney General, and William Fisher., Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

The sole error complained of is that the evidence was insufficient to support a verdict of guilty of grand larceny. We have examined it and are of the opinion that there was ample testimony to justify the verdict and judgment of the court.

It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment be—

Affirmed.

Whitfield, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Brown, C. J., Terrell and Adams, J. J., dissent.