Case ID: f-appx_358/html/0948-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MEMORANDUM \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis MURILLO-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-50087.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 17, 2009.
    
    Filed Dec. 14, 2009.
    Lara Alaine Stingley, Esquire, Stewart Michael Young, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Ezekiel E. Cortez, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jose Luis Murillo-Rodriguez appeals from the 84-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Murillo-Rodriguez contends that the district court procedurally erred during sentencing by giving undue weight to the need for deterrence and by failing to consider the need to avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities. A review of the record demonstrates that the district court did not procedurally err in fashioning the sentence. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.