Case ID: ala-app_22/html/0288-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "RICE, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(115 So. 78)
    BARLOW v. STATE.
    (3 Div. 566.)
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    Jan. 10, 1928.
    
      Hamilton & Jones, of Evergreen, for appellant.
    Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., and J. W. Brassell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   RICE, J.

It was unnecessary to file a complaint in the circuit court, but, on appeal from the county court, the prosecution might proceed under the original affidavit. Code 1923, § 4646.

The court may never tell the jury how they shall consider testimony. Hence appellant’s written charge A was properly refused.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.