Case ID: misc2d_43/html/0164-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harold V. McAvoy et al., Respondents, v. Anna Di Leo et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) City or New Rochelle, Plaintiff, v. Frank Di Leo, Defendant. (Action No. 2.)
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    April 22, 1964.
    
      
      Howard H. Schrecke for appellants. Fasso & Belserene (Thomas N. Fasso of counsel), for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

Section 205-a of the General Municipal Law is not available to the plaintiffs in the situation here disclosed.

The order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the second cause of action in each complaint should be unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion granted.

Concur — Benjamin, Gulotta and McDonald, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.