Case ID: or-app_31/html/[1027]-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued November 17,
    affirmed December 5, 1977,
    reconsideration denied January 11,
    petition for review denied April 25, 1978
    STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ARCELIOUS DIXON, Appellant.
    
    (No. DA 129045, CA 8792)
    571 P2d 922
    Charles V. Elliott, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
    Kathleen Dahlin, Certified Law Student, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were James A. Redden, Attorney General, and Al J. Laue, Solicitor General, Salem.
    Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Lee and Buttler, Judges.
    PER CURIAM.
   PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that his defense was prejudiced by the state’s failure to comply with the discovery statute, ORS 135.815, and that therefore his conviction for prostitution should be reversed. Not only did defendant not make a record of any specific prejudice, he did not request discovery in accordance with the discovery statute, ORS 135.845.

Affirmed.