Case ID: us_339/html/0974-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 844. No. 845. No. 846. No. 847.
    Loew’s, Inc. v. United States; Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. et al. v. United States; Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. et al. v. United States; and United States v. Loew’s, Inc. et al.
    
      John W. Davis, J. Robert Rubin and S. Hazard Gillespie, Jr. for appellant in No. 844.
    
      Joseph M. Proskauer and Robert W. Perkins for Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. et al., appellants in No. 845.
    
      James F. Byrnes, Otto E. Koegel, John F. Caskey and Frederick W. R. Pride for Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. et al., appellants in No. 846.
    
      Solicitor General Perlman for the United States, appellant in No. 847.
   Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Per Curiam:

The judgment is affirmed. Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Burton are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the cases set down for argument. Mr. Justice Jackson and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.