Case ID: ohio-st-3d_74/html/0616-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mitchell.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Mitchell (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 616.]
    
      (No. 95-2531
    Submitted January 24, 1996 —
    Decided February 28, 1996.)
    
      
      Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Stacy M. Solochek, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
    
      Theodore F. Stebbins, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s findings of misconduct, but disagree with its recommended sanction. Accordingly, given the gravity of respondent’s crime, respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.