Case ID: so3d_192/html/0625-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jose VALDES, Appellant, v. Kimberly VALDES, Appellee.
    No. 4D15-1797.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 25, 2016.
    Jose Valdes, Coral Gables, pro se.
    No appearance for appellee. ■
   PER CURIAM.

The Father appeals the Final Judgment of Dissolution, arguing the trial court abused its discretion by seeking out and inventing its own facts, and that the trial court miscalculated his timesharing. We agree the trial court erred in its calculation of timesharing. The Final Judgment and Parenting Plan awarded the Father 41.87% timesharing. However, the Parenting Plan reflects only 22% of actual timesharing for the Father. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for recalculation. On remand, the trial court should also clarify when the Father’s weekend time-sharing begins.

Reversed and remanded.

STEVENSON, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.