Case ID: sw2d_873/html/0342-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Keith SCOTT, Appellant.
    No. 63728.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    April 12, 1994.
    John A. Klosterman, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Asst. Atty. Gen., F. Martin Dajani, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. Finding no error, we affirm. Further, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.

Judgment and sentence affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).