Case ID: nj-eq_83/html/0347-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles H. Blohm, respondent, v. John M. Hannan et al., appellants.
    [Argued March 23d, 1914.
    Decided May 8th, 1914.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, whose opinion is reported in 82 N. J. Eq. 192.
    
    
      Mr. J. Emil Walscheid, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. Charles E. Blohm and Messrs. McDermott '& Enright, for the respondent.
   Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons' stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisoh, Bogert, Hepreni-ieimer — 6.

For reversal — Bergen, Minturn, Vredenburgh, White — 4.