Case ID: f-appx_320/html/0755-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Aylin AVILES CEREZO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 06-73790.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 18, 2009.
    
    Filed March 31, 2009.
    Aylin Aviles Cerezo, Santa Ana, CA, pro se.
    
      Lisa Marie Arnold, Senior Litigation Counsel, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Kurt B. Larson, Esquire, Stacy Stiffel Paddack, Colette Jabes Winston, Esquire, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
    Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Aylin Aviles Cerezo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA acted within its discretion in denying Aviles Cerezo’s motion to reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the BIA’s March 24, 2006 order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.