Case ID: f-appx_171/html/0633-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Antonio VILLANUEVA, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 04-10420.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 8, 2006.
    
    Decided March 17, 2006.
    Debra R. Douglas, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Oakland, CA, for PlaintiffAppellee.
    George C. Boisseau, Esq., Santa Rosa, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: CANBY, BEEZER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Antonio Villanueva appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed after his guilty plea to illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The record reflects that the district court would have imposed the same sentence had it been aware that the Sentencing Guidelines were advisory. See United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073,1083 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.