Case ID: so2d_595/html/0315-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Steven Leslie PALEY, Appellant, v. Linne D. PALEY, Appellee.
    No. 91-1706.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    April 1, 1992.
    Catherine Rafferty, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    No brief filed for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The sole issue meriting discussion is the trial court’s failure to set a termination date for the payment of rehabilitative alimony. Rehabilitative alimony can only be awarded for a finite period. Strollo v. Strollo, 365 So.2d 189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Zilbert v. Zilbert, 287 So.2d 100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions to the trial court to conduct a hearing and specify a termination date for such an award.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

DOWNEY and LETTS, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.