Case ID: wis_74/html/0463-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Cassoday, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cudahy and another, Respondents, vs. Crittenden, imp., Appellant. Eldredge and others, Respondents, vs. Crittenden, imp., Appellant.
    
      September 11
    
    
      September 24, 1889.
    
    
      Nichols v. Crittenden, ante, p. 459, followed.
    APPEALS from the Circuit Court for Milwaukee County.
    For the appellant there were briefs by A. G. Weissert, 
      and for the defendant McGeoch briefs by Finches, Lynde c& Miller, and the causes were argued orally bjr B. K. Miller, Jr.
    
    For the respondents there were briefs by Shepard c& Shepard and Flower, Ferny <& Holstein, and oral argument by O. E. Shepard.
    
   The following opinion was filed in each case:

Cassoday, J.

The record in this case discloses similar facts, and presents the same questions of law for determination as in the case of Nichols v. Crittenden, decided herewith [ante, p. 459]. For the reasons given in the opinion filed in that case, the order of the -circuit court is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings according to law.