Case ID: f-appx_590/html/0225-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Bennie A. MACK, JR., Petitioner.
    No. 14-1696.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 8, 2015.
    Decided: Jan. 13, 2015.
    Bennie A. Mack, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
   Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bennie A. Mack, Jr. petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the magistrate judge has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the magistrate judge to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the magistrate judge has issued a recommendation that Mack’s § 2255 motion be denied. Accordingly, because the magistrate judge has recently acted in Mack’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.