Case ID: f-appx_407/html/0490-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cora HOUSTON, Appellant v. SECTEK, INC., Appellee.
    No. 10-7022.
    United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
    Jan. 31, 2011.
    Lisa Alexis Jones, Esquire, Lisa Alexis Jones, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Appellant.
    Alan S. Block, Andrew Butz, Bonner Kiernan Trebach & Crociata, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
    BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and HENDERSON and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This case was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments by counsel. It is

ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed.

Appellant Cora Houston, a black female, brought suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 against her former employer, SecTek, Inc., alleging race-based disparate treatment, hostile work environment and constructive discharge. The district court granted summary judgment to SecTek. For the reasons stated in the district court’s memorandum opinion filed January 28, 2010, we affirm.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41(a)(1).