Case ID: so2d_618/html/0365-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. FARMER, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ghita Faye WOLPOWITZ, Appellant, v. Allan WOLPOWITZ, Appellee.
    No. 93-0599.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 19, 1993.
    Rehearing and Reconsideration Denied June 17, 1993.
    A. Matthew Miller of Miller, Schwartz & Miller, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant.
    Lee Milich of Lee Milich, P.A., North Miami, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

FARMER, J., concurs specially with opinion.

FARMER, Judge,

concurring specially.

Our action, in affirming the trial court’s decision to deny temporary attorney’s fees under section 61.16, Florida Statutes (1991), in this dissolution of marriage action should not be understood by the trial judge as the law of the case as to either the reasonableness of the fee agreement between the Wife and her lawyer or the reasonableness of the fees he has charged her to date. Both of these subjects remain open for consideration in any future application for fees. In denying fees, the trial judge has not necessarily ruled on these issues.