Case ID: ala-app_23/html/0634-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BRICKEN, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(119 So. 921)
    Martin HANCOCK v. STATE.
    (3 Div. 597.)
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    Jan. 22, 1929.
    Hybart, Hare & Dickey, of Evergreen, for appellant.
    Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.
   BRICKEN, P. J.

This appellant was convicted for- violating the prohibition law by having whisky in his possession. Prom the judgment of conviction he appealed.

The case as tried in the court below presented a clear-cut issue of fact for the determination of the jury. Prom a careful consideration of the whole record, this court is of the opinion that the accused was accorded a fair and impartial trial, free from injurious error; therefore the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken is affirmed.

Affirmed.