Case ID: ga-app_45/html/0519-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bkoyi.es, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

22417.
    Hall v. The State.
    Decided August 31, 1932.
    
      P. Z. Geer, for plaintiff in error.
    
      B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general, Bond Almand, contra.
   Bkoyi.es, C. J.

1. The venue of the offense was sufficiently proved.

2. The verdict was demanded by the evidence and the statement of the defendant to the jury, and, therefore, any error in the charge of the court was harmless. Accordingly, the ground of the motion for a new trial, alleging error in an excerpt from the charge, will not be passed upon. The refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Hooper, J., concurs in the judgment.