Case ID: f2d_948/html/0934-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Barry GREER, Daniel Alvis Wood, Sean Christian Tarrant, Michael Lewis Lawrence, and Lance Jon Jordan, Defendants-Appellants.
    No. 90-1348.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Dec. 3, 1991.
    Jeb Loveless, Dallas, Tex. (court-appointed), for Tarrant.
    
      James M. Murphy, Dallas, Tex. (court-appointed), for Greer.
    J. Craig Jett, Dallas, Tex. (court-appointed), for Wood.
    R. Kristin Weaver, Dallas, Tex., for Jordan.
    Blake Withrow, Dallas, Tex., for Lawrence.
    David L. Botsford, Alvis, Carssow, Cum-mins, Hoeffner & Botsford, Austin, Tex., for amicus curiae, Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Assoc.
    Lisa J. Stark, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., for U.S.
   ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion August 13, 1991, 5 Cir., 1991, 939 F.2d 1076)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, POLITZ, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.