Case ID: ind-app_86/html/0734-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Boxal et al. v. Pavey.
    [No. 12,587.
    Filed February 1, 1927.
    Rehearing denied April 1, 1927.]
    From Delaware Circuit Court; Clarence W. Dearth, Judge. .
    Action between Luther Boxal and others and Mary C. Pavey. From the judgment rendered, the former appeal. Affirmed. By the court in banc.
    
      A. E. Needham and Elmer E. Botkin, for appellants.
    
      F. F. McClellan, D. D. Hensel and L. A. Guthrie, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

— We have gone through the record in this ease; we see no merit in this appeal and are impressed that it was taken simply for the purpose of delay. The judgment is therefore affirmed with ten (10) per cent, damages.