Case ID: f-appx_458/html/0827-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Yvira BAEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. POTAMKIN HYUNDAI, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 11-13568
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Feb. 16, 2012.
    Raymond G. Ingalsbe, Raymond G. In-galsbe, PA, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, Timothy Carl Blake, Attorney at Law Timothy Carl Blake, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Timothy John Grecsek, Kurkin Forehand Brandes, Aventura, FL, Robert Craig Spickard, Kurkin Forehand Brandes, LLP, Tallahassee, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before MARCUS, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The rulings of the District Court in granting the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; in denying the Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and in dismissing the Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint are affirmed for the reasons set forth in the June 14, 2011 Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, which was adopted by the District Court on July 11, 2011.

AFFIRMED.