Case ID: sw2d_949/html/0287-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Colleen STEPHENS, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Harold L. STEPHENS, Respondent/Appellant.
    No. 70700.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Six.
    Aug. 5, 1997.
    Joseph Howlett, Clayton, for respondent/appellant.
    Daniel V. O’Brien, St. Louis, for petitioner/respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.
   ORDER

Husband appeals from a decree dissolving the parties’ marriage. He challenges the award of maintenance and the allocation of debt to the parties. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).