Case ID: cust-ct_59/html/0597-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Watson, Judge:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(R.D. 11330)
    Shalom & Co. v. United States
    (Decided July 6, 1967)
    
      Lane, Young & Foco for the plaintiff.
    
      Oarl Eardley, Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
   Watson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for"decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the above appeal for reappraisement consists of hair wigs exported from Japan subsequent to February 27,1958.

That hair wigs are not identified in the Final List, published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958; and that said merchandise was entered for consumption subsequent to February 27,1958.

That on or about the date of exportation of the said merchandise, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold, or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the appraised value less the buying commission, as stated on the invoice.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the above appeal for reappraisement may be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here in question and that such value was the appraised value, less the buying commission, as stated on the invoice.

Judgment will issue accordingly.