Case ID: so2d_626/html/1118-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Willie COLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 93-446.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 30, 1993.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Julie M. -Levitt, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Angelica D. Zayas, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
    Before HUBBART, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. § 90.803(2), Fla.Stat. (1991); Warren v. State, 498 So.2d 472, 477 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (“Generally speaking, an objection is required in these cases in order to preserve for appellate review the propriety of the trial court’s ‘Allen’ charge....”), rev. denied, 503 So.2d 328 (Fla.1987); see also Stephney v. State, 564 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Mitchell v. State, 521 So.2d 185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).