Case ID: njl_97/html/0351-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOHN ZICK, RESPONDENT, v. JOHN F. SMITH, APPELLANT.
    Submitted December 5, 1921
    Decided February 2, 1922.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 95 N. J. L. 388.
    For the respondent, Atwood G. Wolf.
    
    For the appellant, Collins & Corbin.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in) the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice ICatzenbach in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayzb, Trenchaed, Parker, Minturn, Iyalisch, Black, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskiek, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.