Case ID: conn_161/html/0601-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Archibald H. Tunick et al. v. Surha, Inc.
    
      John J. Keogh, Jr., for the appellees (plaintiffs).
    
      Arthur A. Hiller, for the appellant (defendant Moe Tunick).
    
      Stuart I. Levin, for the appellant (defendant David Tunick).
    Argued October 5
    decided October 27, 1971
   The motion of August 10, 1971, by the plaintiffs to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is denied without prejudice to further briefing and argument on appeal.

The motion of August 11,1971, by the plaintiffs to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Fair-field County is denied without prejudice to further briefing and argument on appeal.