Case ID: so2d_207/html/0488-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

COVENANT PALMS OF MIAMI, INC., a/k/a Covenant Palms of Miami, a non-profit corporation, Appellant, v. Oscar Arthur GUSTAFSON and Amy Esther Gustafson, his wife, Appellees.
    No. 67-285.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    Feb. 27, 1968.
    Rehearing Denied March 22, 1968.
    Butler, Swope & Manning, Miami Shores, for appellant.
    Montague Rosenberg, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.
    Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The basic question in this appeal is whether the evidence before the chancellor sufficiently supports the decree in favor of the appellee, defendant-counter-claimant. We have carefully examined the record on appeal and find no basis for disturbing the decree appealed. Alvarez v. Dumont, Fla.App.1965, 178 So.2d 352; Central Bank and Trust Co. v. Banner Trading Co., Fla.App.1963, 157 So.2d 201; Turner v. Noto, Fla.App.1963, 151 So.2d 303; DiMarco v. King, Fla.App.1962, 139 So.2d 750.

Affirmed.