Case ID: ad3d_40/html/0908-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William Davitt, Plaintiff, v City of New York et al., Appellants, and M.A.C.C. Construction, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendant.
    [836 NYS2d 651]
   In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants City of New York, New York City Transit Authority, and American Bridge Company appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J), dated February 27, 2006, which denied their motion for summary judgment on their cross claim for contractual indemnification against the defendant M.A.C.C. Construction, Inc.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff allegedly sustained injuries when he stepped on a piece of plywood covering a portion of a sidewalk that had been excavated in connection with the ongoing repair of columns supporting an elevated subway line above the sidewalk. The Supreme Court properly denied the appellants’ motion for summary judgment on their cross claim for contractual indemnification against the defendant subcontractor M.A.C.C. Construction, Inc., because they failed to establish, as a matter of law, that the appellant American Bridge Company, the general contractor, was free from negligence (see Itri Brick & Concrete Corp. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 89 NY2d 786, 795 [1997]; Coque v Wildflower Estates Devs., Inc., 31 AD3d 484, 489-490 [2006]; Watters v R.D. Branch Assoc., LP, 30 AD3d 408, 409-410 [2006]). Miller, J.P., Ritter, Covello and Balkin, JJ., concur.