Case ID: ad2d_298/html/0604-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Exantheras Nunn, Appellant.
    [748 NYS2d 690]
   Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Honorof, J.), rendered April 16, 2001, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to establish that he had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the stolen printer. Thus, he lacked standing to challenge the validity of the search of the printer (see People v Ramirez-Portoreal, 88 NY2d 99, 108-109; People v Walker, 192 AD2d 734, 735; People v Jaime, 171 AD2d 884, 885; People v Metz, 168 AD2d 515, 516).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Smith, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Crane, JJ., concur.