Case ID: nys_3/html/0946-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hall v. Armando.
    
      (Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.
    
    May 7,1888.)
    
      M. Bogersderfer, for appellant. M. Mehling, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The action in the Fourth district court being for the claim and delivery of personal property, the counter-claim for work, labor, and services was properly disregarded, as another action can be brought for that counter-claim. We cannot see that any error was committed by the justice in the trial, and the judgment should therefore be affirmed, with costs.