Case ID: f2d_884/html/0174-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Howard M. ROSENSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 87-1888.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Sept. 7, 1989.
    Sam A. Lindsay, Chandra V. Fripp, Asst. City Attys., Dallas, Tex., for defendant-appellant.
    Bruce A. Pauley, Lyon & Lyon, Rowlett, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
   ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, and DUHE, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.