Case ID: ad_247/html/0351-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Bertha Hertzberg, Respondent, against Morris Hertzberg, Appellant.
    First Department,
    May 1, 1936.
    
      Murray Kurman, for the appellant.
    
      Arthur Bainbridge Hoff, Jr., of counsel [Paxton Blair with him on the brief; Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel, attorney], for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The record contains no proof of the marriage of the parties upon which a finding may be based that defendant under the law owes petitioner support and maintenance. We are consequently unable to support the ruling made in the Domestic Relations Court, and it should be reversed and a new hearing ordered.

Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.

Order unanimously reversed and a new hearing ordered.