Case ID: so3d_103/html/0259-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WELLS, Chief Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kimberly Ann MILES and Jody Haynes, Appellants, v. Daniel WEINGRAD, M.D., Appellee.
    No. 3D12-779.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 19, 2012.
    Alex Alvarez; Robert S. Glazier, for appellants.
    Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt and Bruce M. Stanley, Sr., Ft. Myers; Hicks Porter, Ebenfeld & Stein, Dinah Stein and Mark Hicks, for appellee.
    Before WELLS, C.J., and SUAREZ, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
   WELLS, Chief Judge.

Finding no conflict between our prior opinion in Weingrad v. Miles, 29 So.3d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010), and the Supreme Court’s opinion in American Optical Corp. v. Spiewak, 73 So.3d 120 (Fla.2011), we affirm.