Case ID: f-appx_33/html/0693-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William H. MATHEWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor BRIGGS; Mr. Roach; L. Fuentes, Dietician; Rosilind Wilson; Prison Health Services; Western Correctional Institution; Doctor Tessema; Warden Galley, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 02-6041.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted April 25, 2002.
    Decided May 6, 2002.
    William H. Mathews, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Joseph Crawford, Adelman, Sheff & Smith, Rockville, Maryland; John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

William H. Mathews appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mathews v. Briggs, No. CA-00-3685-PJM (D. Md. filed Nov. 29, 2001 & entered Nov. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.