Case ID: f-appx_671/html/0177-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHONG SU YI, People of Similar Situations, Plaintiff-Appellant v. GOLDEN CORRAL, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 16-1721
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: December 15, 2016
    Decided: December 19, 2016
    Chong Su Yi, Appellant Pro Se.
    
      Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chong Su Yi appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no-reversible error. Accordingly, we modify the district court's order to show that the dismissal is without prejudice and affirm as modified for the reasons stated by the district court. Yi v. Golden Corral, No. 8:16-ev-01151-TDC (D. Md. May 31, 2016); see also Nagy v. FMC Butner, 376 F.3d 252, 258 (4th Cir. 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED