Case ID: njl_100/html/0179-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JESSE LOBSENZ, RESPONDENT, v. F. ROBERT YOUNG, APPELLANT.
    Submitted March 24, 1924
    Decided April 25, 1924.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 99 N. J. L. 28.
    For the respondent, Abraham I. Feliman.
    
    For the appellant, Michael Dunn and Michael J. Murphy.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should, be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Mtnturn, Kaltsci-i, Black, Katzenbaoit, Campbell. Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskiek, Clark, HcGlennon, JJ'. ‘ 13.

For reversal — None.