Case ID: utah_67/html/0192-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      STRAUP, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anna Andrew PERPINAKIS et al., Plaintiffs, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF UTAH and Utah Fuel Company, Defendants.
    No. 4383.
    Decided May 11, 1926.
    (246 P. 704)
    
      N. J. Cotro-Manes and C. E. Norton, both of Salt Lake City, for plaintiffs.
    
      Harvey H. Cluff, Atty. Gen., and J. Robert Robinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant Industrial Commission.
    
      Ferdinand Erickson, of Salt Lake City, for defendant Fuel Co.
   STRAUP, J.

This is an application to review a proceeding of the Industrial Commission of Utah. The commission denied plaintiff’s application for compensation upon the ground that dependency upon the deceased employee was not established. This application presents the same questions that were presented in Kavalinakis v. Ind. Comm. (Utah) 246 P. 698, just decided and not yet [officially] reported.

Upon the authority of that case the decision of the Industrial Commission in this case must be, and it accordingly is, affirmed.

GIDEON, C. J., and THURMAN, FRICK, and CHERRY, JJ., concur.