Case ID: f-appx_63/html/0975-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Frank JARVILL, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-30382.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted May 12, 2003.
    
    Decided May 20, 2003.
    Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Jarvill’s request for oral argument is denied.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Michael Frank Jarvill appeals the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 371, mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1341, and wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742.

We reject Jarvill’s contention that his sentence should be vacated because of inadequate notice for the reason that it does not constitute reversible error.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.