Case ID: njl_102/html/0724-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NATHAN ROSENBERG, APPELLANT, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
    Argued February 4, 1920
    Decided April 1, 1926.
    Oil appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N. J. Mis. R. 1132.
    For the appellant, Kalisch & Kalisch.
    
    For the respondent, Frank G. Turner.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme’ Court.

For affirmance■ — Trenchard, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.