Case ID: ark_253/html/0841-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Conley Byrd, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bobby Earl NORFUL and Samuel Edward NORFUL v. STATE of Arkansas
    5795
    489 S.W. 2d 239
    Opinion delivered January 22, 1973
    
      John C. Earl, for appellants.
    
      Ray Thornton, Atty. Gen., by: Julie McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
   Conley Byrd, Justice.

Appellants Bobby Earl Norful and Samuel Edward Norful contend that their robbery conviction should be set aside because of lack of identification. There is no merit to this contention. The record shows eye witness identification, possession of the fruits of the crime within minutes after the robbery, and a signed confession by both appellants.

Affirmed.