Case ID: nys_122/html/1143-15.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROYAL WEAVING CO. v. PRINCE.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    March 24, 1910.)
    Appeal from Special Term, New York County. Action by the Royal Weaving Company against Julius Prince. From an order directing plaintiff to furnish a further bill of particulars, plaintiff appeals.
    Modified and affirmed.
    See, also, 130 App. Div. 903, 115 N. Y. Supp. 1142.
    Ahraham Gruber, for appellant.
    Henry S. Dottenheim, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from should be modified, by striking out the words “and further specifying the hour and minute when the said alleged repudiation, notification, and direction were made, and the hour and minute when the said tender was made, as nearly as the same can be stated,” and, as thus modified, affirmed, without costs to either party.