Case ID: f-appx_32/html/0393-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael E. ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A.A. LAMARQUE; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 01-16133.
    D.C. No. CV-01-00341-MMC.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 11, 2002.
    
    Decided March 20, 2002.
    Before CANBY, BEEZER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Michael E. Allen, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000), and affirm, see Frost v. Agnos, 152 F.3d 1124, 1130 (9th Cir.1998); Sanchez v. Vild, 891 F.2d 240, 242 (9th Cir. 1989).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.