Case ID: ny-2d_42/html/1010-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Castagna & Son, Inc., Plaintiff, v City of New York, Defendant-Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Gruzen & Partners, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. Wachtel, Duklauer & Fein, Inc., Appellant, v City of New York, Defendant-Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Gruzen & Partners, Third-Party DefendantRespondent.
    Submitted July 18, 1977;
    decided September 13, 1977
   Motion for leave to appeal dismissed, with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements, upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 39, pp 158-159).