Case ID: nys_104/html/1126-11.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DUIS, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    April 19, 1907.)
    Action by George W. Duis against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.
   PER CURIAM.

The motion is made so late as to justify an imputation of laches, and the third party who might be sued for the injury could now raise the statute of limitations. Therefore the order is reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with costs.