Case ID: a3d_166/html/1236-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MEYER, DARRAGH, BUCKLER, BEBENEK & ECK, P.L.L.C., Petitioner v. LAW FIRM OF MALONE MIDDLEMAN, PC, and Candace A. Eazor and Richard Eazor, as Executors of the Estate of Richard A. Eazor, Respondents Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C., Petitioner v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, P.C. and Candace A. Eazor and Richard Eazor as Executors of the Estate of Richard A. Eazor, Respondents
    No. 397 WAL 2016
    No. 398 WAL 2016
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    February 22, 2017
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of February, 2017, the Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court erred in vacating the Judgment of the Court of Common Pleas with respect to Meyer Darragh’s quantum meruit claim when Meyer Darragh performed legal work and incurred expenses on behalf of the client and doing so would force Meyer Darragh to engage that client, who has already paid its legal fees in full, in litigation or allow Malone Middleman to be unjustly enriched.