Case ID: f-appx_5/html/0002-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kansas MUNICIPALS, Petitioner v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent WILLIAMS GAS PIPELINES CENTRAL, INC. Intervenor
    No. 99-1525.
    United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
    Feb. 26, 2001.
    Before STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, SENTELLE and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.
   JUDGMENT

This petition for review was heard on the record from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the briefs and arguments of counsel. The issues have been accorded full consideration by the Court and occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). Petitioners have failed to show that the agency action was “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” See 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A). It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition for review is denied.

The clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 41(a)(1).