Case ID: so2d_564/html/0650-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James HIGDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 89-2228.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Aug. 8, 1990.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Robert Friedman, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard E. Doran, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentence. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in assessing thirty (30) excess points against appellant on the sentencing guidelines scoresheet. However, even with the deletion of these points the trial court’s sentence is well within the permitted and recommended range of sentences set out in the guidelines.

ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and KAHN, MARTIN D., Associate Judge, concur.