Case ID: nw2d_906/html/0910-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

2018 ND 40
    Ibrahim Hassan NUR, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
    No. 20170349
    Supreme Court of North Dakota.
    Filed 2/22/2018
    Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck,-ND 58501, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
    ' Tracy E. -Hines (argued), Assistant State’s Attorney, and Tristan J. Van de Streek (on brief), Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND 58108-2806, for respondent and, appellee.
   Per Curiam.

[¶1] Ibrahim Hassan Nur appeals from the district court’s order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Nur argues he did not voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waive his right to counsel, and he argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel. The district court did not err in summarily denying Nut’s application for post-conviction relief for misuse of process on the issue of his waiver to the right to counsel. Also, the district court did not err in denying Nur’s application for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel and its findings of fact were not clearly erroneous. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (6).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte