Case ID: f-appx_669/html/0708-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gilberto QUINONES-ALONSO, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-10704 Conference Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Date Filed: 10/18/2016
    
      James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Dallas, TX.
    Gilberto Quinones-Alonso, Pro Se, Adelanto, CA.
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gilberto Quinones-Alonso has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Quinones-Alonso has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

However, the judgment contains a clerical error pertaining to Quinones-Alonso’s written judgment. The judgment identifies the statute violated as “8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1)/(2).” The court’s colloquy at re-arraignment and the presentence report, however, advised Quinones-Alonso that he was subject to the maximum ten-year penalty set forth in § 1326(b)(1), and Qui-nones-Alonso was sentenced to less than ten years of imprisonment. We therefore REMAND to the district court for the limited purpose of correcting this clerical error. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.