Case ID: cust-ct_4/html/0435-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 43443.
    Protests 288934-G, etc., of R. Jabbour & Co. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Venice lace similar to that involved in Littwitz v. United States (3 Cust. Ct. 123, C. D. 217) and linen articles embroidered and trimmed with lace the same as the merchandise passed upon in Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.