Case ID: sw2d_809/html/0188-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Donald DIXON, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 58557.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    May 21, 1991.
    Robert L. Fleming, Columbia, for mov-ant-appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Joan F. Gummels, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant’s, Donald Dixon, sole point on appeal is the trial court was clearly erroneous in denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing and finding of facts and conclusions of law. We have reviewed the record and find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).