Case ID: ny_200/html/0592-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eugene L. Waldo et al., Doing Business under the Firm Name of Waldo & McKelvey, Respondents, v. Fedor Schmidt, Individually and as Surviving Partner of the Firm of Remy, Schmidt & Pleissner, Appellant.
    
      Waldo v. Schmidt, 132 App. Div. 929, affirmed.
    (Argued January 6, 1911;
    decided January 27, 1911.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 31, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee in an action to set aside an account stated as fraudulent and for an accounting.
    
      Martin L. Stover and Edwin Blumenthal for appellant.
    
      Clarence De Witt Rogers and Samuel C. Steinhardt for respondents.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.