Case ID: ohio-st-2d_50/html/0305-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Cwiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cincinnati Bar Association v. Chacksfield.
    (D. D. No. 77-1
    Decided June 29, 1977.)
    
      
      Mr. John J. Getgey, Jr., Mr. Robert M. Bratton, Jr., Mr. Robert L. Davis and Mr. Clement J. DeMichelis, for relator.
    
      Mr. Marvm Kleinman and Mr. Nelson Lancione, for respondent.
   Per Cwiam.

Upon an examination of the record of this action, we find that respondent’s actions were in violation of the following canons of the Code of Professional Responsibility as charged:

Canon 1. “A Lawyer Should Assist in Maintaining the Integrity and Competence of the Legal Profession.”

Canon 7. “A Lawyer Should Represent a Client Zealously Within the Bounds of the Law.”

Canon 9. “A Lawyer Should Avoid Even the Appearance of Professional Impropriety.”

Therefore, we accept the board’s recommendation, and the respondent is indefimtely suspended from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

O’Neill,, C. J., Herbert, Celebrezze, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.