Case ID: sw2d_936/html/0868-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Richard BROWN, Appellant.
    No. 70340.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Jan. 7, 1997.
    Nadine Valeria Nunn, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Fernando Burmudez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Richard Brown, appeals the judgment of conviction for unlawful use of a weapon, RSMo § 571.030.1(1) (1994), entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury trial. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. Because an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).