Case ID: sw3d_134/html/0795-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael A. RALLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 62393.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    May 25, 2004.
    John M. Sehilmoeller, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Adriane Dixon Crouse, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and EDWIN H. SMITH and HOWARD, JJ.
   Order

PER CURIAM.

Michael A. Ralls appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentia-ry hearing. In his sole point on appeal, Ralls alleges the motion court erred in denying his motion for post-conviction relief, because he received ineffective assistance. Ralls argues his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in failing to request that the trial court submit to the jury an instruction for first-degree trespass, a lesser-included offense of second-degree burglary.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).