Case ID: ny_184/html/0533-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James W. Purdy, Jr., et al., Respondents, v. Guy S. Brantingham, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.
    
      Purdy v. Brantingham, 100 App. Div. 516, affirmed.
    (Argued January 29, 1906;
    decided February 13, 1906.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 30, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
    
      Alexander Thain for appellant.
    
      Allan C. Rowe for respondents.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Werner, His-cock and Chase, JJ. Not voting: Edward T. Bartlett, J.