Case ID: nys_125/html/1140-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

POTTER, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    November 15, 1910.)
    Action by Erastus D. Potter against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. See opinion by SPRING, J., on former appeal in same case, reported at 134 App. Div. 827, 119 N. Y. Supp. 150.

McLennan, P. J., and ROBSON, J., dissent upon the ground that the evidence fails to establish any further duty of defendant as to giving signals at the crossing in question than that required at the ordinary farm crossing.