Case ID: ny-2d_68/html/0884-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Sharon Fulton and Others, on Behalf of Themselves and Their Minor Children, Appellants-Respondents, and Patricia Cossley, Intervenor-Appellant, v James Krauskopf, as Commissioner of the Human Resources Administration of the City of New York, and of the New York City Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents-Appellants, and Cesar Perales, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, Respondent.
    Submitted August 18, 1986;
    decided October 16, 1986
   Motion by respondents Krauskopf and Burdick, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed that part of an order granting petitioners’ motion for a preliminary injunction, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as dismissed the article 78 proceeding against Perales, dismissed upon the ground that Krauskopf and Burdick are not aggrieved by the dismissal against Perales (CPLR 5511).