Case ID: pa_543/html/0402-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

672 A.2d 279
    WISSINOMING BOTTLING COMPANY v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA and City of Philadelphia and Honorable Cheryl Weiss, Appellants at No. 49. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, Appellant at No. 50 v. TAX REVIEW BOARD OF CITY OF PHILADELPHIA to the Use of Clement & Muller, Inc.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Argued Jan. 22, 1996.
    Decided Feb. 13, 1996.
    Joseph A. Dworetzky, Philadelphia and Richard Feder, for School District of Phila.
    Stewart M. Weintraub and Ellen M. Gussman, Philadelphia, for Clement, et al.
    
      BEFORE: NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE and NIGRO, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The Court being evenly divided, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed.

NEWMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

FLAHERTY, CASTILLE and NIGRO, JJ., dissent and would reverse the Order of the Commonwealth Court.