Case ID: sw3d_2/html/0849-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Katherine MITCHELL, Claimant/Appellant, v. MERCANTILE BANK, N.A., Employer, and Missouri Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, division of Employment Security, Respondent.
    No. ED 75019.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Sept. 28, 1999.
    
      Katherine Mitchell, St. Louis, pro se.
    Mercantile Bank, St. Louis, pro se.
    Larry R. Ruhmann, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DO.WD, Jr., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the decision of the Administrative Law Judge denying compensation. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission .are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Respondent’s motion to strike claimant’s amended brief and to dismiss the appeal is denied.