Case ID: njl_106/html/0236-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam. •", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WILLIAM DEFFUR ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. MICHAEL J. TANSEY, APPELLANT.
    Argued May 31, 1929
    Decided February 3, 1930.
    For the respondents, Keating & Keating.
    
    For the appellant, Michael J. Tansey.
    
   Pee Cueiam. •

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Paekee, Kalisch, Campbell, Case, Bodine, Van Buskiek, McG-lennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Hone.