Case ID: ohio-st-3d_83/html/0304-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cleveland Bar Association v. Allanson.
    [Cite as Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Allanson (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 304.]
    (No. 98-753
    Submitted June 10, 1998
    Decided September 30, 1998.)
    
      
      Martin J. Murphy and Cathleen M. Bolek, for relator.
   Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. Respondent’s failure to pursue his clients’ interests, his misrepresentation to U’Ren about the status of a claim, and his failure both in this instance and on previous occasions to cooperate in relator’s investigation warrant the suspension. We therefore adopt the recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.