Case ID: f-appx_140/html/0505-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert Andrew BARTLETT, Sr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; Theodis Beck; Boyd Bennett; Roby C. Lee; Tony Sanders, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 05-6462.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted July 27, 2005.
    Decided Aug. 4, 2005.
    
      Robert Andrew Bartlett, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
    Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Robert Andrew Bartlett, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bartlett v. North Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-04-576-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED