Case ID: f-appx_691/html/0280-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ARKANSAS WAREHOUSE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. SAINT-GOBAIN CERAMICS & PLASTICS, INC., Defendant-Appellee
    No. 16-4218
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 12, 2017
    Filed: June 15, 2017
    Joseph F. Gilker, Gilker & Jones, Moun-tainburg, AR, for Plaintiff-Appellant
    Stephen Neal Joiner, Byron Jansen Walker, Rose Law Firm, Little Rock, AR, for Defendant-Appellee
    Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

In this diversity action for unjust enrichment, Arkansas Warehouse, Inc. appeals the district court’s grant of for summary judgment to defendant-appellee Saint-Go-bain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.

After careful de novo review, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006), we conclude that the district court’s disposition of the cross-motions for summary judgment was appropriate for the reasons stated its opinion and order. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.