Case ID: nj-super_105/html/0474-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ARTHUR A. PELOSO AND MARILYN PELOSO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CONNECTICUT CORPORATION, AND SOPHIE STEIN SCHILLER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
    Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
    Argued May 5, 1969
    Decided May 14, 1969.
    Before Judge Gaulkif, Collester and Labrecque.
    
      Mr. 8am Weiss argued the cause for appellants.
    
      Mr. William B. McGuire argued the cause for respondent Hartford Pire Insurance Company (Messrs. Bum, Biunno & Tomplcins, attorneys; Mr. William J. McGee, on the brief).
   Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs appeal from the entry of summary judgment dismissing their suit to recover against the defendant for a fire loss.

The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Mehler reported at 102 N. J. Super. 357 (Law Div. 1968). See also Staehle v. American Employers Ins. Co., 103 N. J. Super. 152 (App. Div. 1968).