Case ID: nj-eq_112/html/0088-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph C. Braelow et al., complainants, v. Louis Schlesinger, Incorporated, defendant-appellant; Feist & Feist, Incorporated, defendant-respondent.
    [Decided January 5th, 1933.]
    
      Mr. Jacob L. Newman {Mr. Lionel P. Kristeller and Mr. Saul J. Zuclcer, of counsel), for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Philip J. Schotland, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree in the event below will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Church, and reported in 109 N. J. Eq. 472.

We have noticed a slight misstatement of fact in the opinion which does not at all affect the result.

For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 16.

For reversal — None.