Case ID: ad2d_1/html/1037-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Leo V. Sheehan, Respondent, v. Edward Behr, Appellant, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 1) Lorraine Behr et al., Plaintiffs, v. Esso Standard Oil Co., Defendant. (Action No. 2)
   In a consolidated action to recover damages for personal injuries, Edward Behr, one of the defendants in Action No. 1, appeals from order which, on reargument, granted a motion for a preference, pursuant to rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order modified by striking from the second ordering paragraph everything following the word respects ” and by substituting therefor the word denied ”. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. Destitution and incapacity to work are insufficiently shown. (Farewell v. Milbank, 284 App. Div. 898; Svei v. Minck Bros. & Co., 279 App. Div. 597; Quinlan v. Schaefer Brewing Co., 279 App. Div. 805; O’Callaghan v. Brawley, 276 App. Div. 908.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.