Case ID: kan_27/html/0784-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

R. P. Freeman v. Joseph Duncan.
    At the September Term, 1881, of the district court of Ellsworth county, Duncan, plaintiff, recovered a judgment for $291 and costs against defendant Freeman, who brings the case here.
    
      J. H. Snead, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Lloyd & Evans, for defendant in error.
   Per Curiam:

The judgment in this case is affirmed, on the •authority of the following cases: Bartlett v. Feeney, 11 Kas. 593; Moody v. Arthur, 16 Kas. 419; Abeles v. Cohen, 8 Kas. 180; Bridge Co. v. Murphy, 13 Kas. 35; Shepard v. Allen, 16 Kas. 184.