Case ID: ga_41/html/0413-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

N. A. SMITH et al., plaintiffs in error, v. A. V. BOATRITE et al. defendants in error.
    (Atlanta,
    June Term, 1870.)
    BILL OF EXCEPTIONS—DECISION AND ERRORS MUST BE PLAINLY STATED.—A bill of exceptions must specify plainly the decision complained of and the error alleged, and if it do not it will be dismissed. (R.)
    Bill of Exceptions. From Marion county. March Term, 1870.
    The bill of' exceptions recited, without more, that the cause of Jackson M. Magill, administrator, etc., against A. V. Boat-rite et al., a bill for. relief, direction and injunction was submitted for final decree, and upon the pleadings “a report of the Master and the things therein contained being considered by the Judge, he rendered a decree which is of record *which is referred to in this bill of exceptions, to which decree the heirs at law, N. A. Smith and others (named), except.”
    Upon motion of defendant’s counsel, the bill of exceptions was dismissed because it did not specify plainly the decision complained of and the errors alleged.
    B. B. Plinton, for plaintiff in error.
    Peabody & Brannon, for defendant.
    
      
      BILL OF EXCEPTIONS—ERRORS MUST BE PLAINLY STATED.'—See foot-note to Taylor v. Flint, 35 Ga. 124.