Case ID: cust-ct_4/html/0388-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 43174.
    Protests 302583-G, etc., of Shalom & Co. et al. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the evidence it was found that certain items consist of Venice laces similar to those involved in Littwitz v. United States (3 Cust. Ct. 123, C. D. 217) and filet lace, Saxony lace, and Normandy lace similar to the merchandise passed upon in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Beyda v. United States (T. D. 46177), and United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.