Case ID: a2d_505/html/1330-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Maine v. Leo T. MILLS.
    Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.
    Argued March 13, 1986.
    Decided March 25, 1986.
    John R. Atwood, Dist. Atty., Geoffrey Rushlau (orally), Asst. Dist. Atty., Belfast, for plaintiff.
    Strout, Payson, Pellicani, Cloutier, Hok-kanen, Strong & Levine, Robert J. Levine (orally), Rockland, for defendant.
    Before McKUSICK, C.J., and NICHOLS, ROBERTS, WATHEN and GLASS-MAN, JJ.
    
      
       Nichols, J., sat at oral argument but did not participate further.
    
   MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Leo T. Mills appeals his conviction in Superior Court, Waldo County, of operating under the influence of intoxicating liquor, 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B. Mills contends that the court improperly denied his motion to suppress evidence gathered as a result of the stop of his vehicle. We conclude that the court applied the proper legal standard to the evidence presented and .that the evidence was sufficient to justify the court’s decision. See State v. Chapman, 495 A.2d 314, 317 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.