Case ID: so2d_580/html/0886-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Irwin ZUCKERMAN, et al., Appellants, v. CITIBANK, N.A., etc., Appellees.
    Nos. 89-2446, 90-13.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 11, 1991.
    Rehearing Denied July 16, 1991.
    Miller and Russell, Coral Gables, Kron-gold, Bass & Todd, Daniels & Hicks, and Angela Flowers, Miami, for appellants.
    Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin & Perwin, and Joel Eaton, Miami, for appellees.
    Before NESBITT, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Kaminester, 400 So.2d 804, 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Ed Skoda Ford, Inc. v. P & P Paint & Body Shop, Inc., 277 So.2d 818, 819 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 284 So.2d 395 (Fla.1973); Arrow Beef Corp. v. Dutkin, 183 So.2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Jones v. Royal Palm Ice Co., 145 So.2d 887, 888 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962), cert. denied, 155 So.2d 552 (Fla.1963).