Case ID: f-appx_275/html/0889-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold Lee ANDREU, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-11443.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    April 30, 2008.
    James H. Burke, Jr., Federal Public Defender, R. Fletcher Peacock, Jacksonville, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Patricia D. Barksdale, Jacksonville, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Before BIRCH, DUBINA and HILL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Appellant Harold Lee Andreu appeals his 30-month sentence for violation of his supervised release. He argues that the sentence imposed by the district court is a general one which is per se illegal. Because no clearly established rule of law in this circuit or any other circuit in the country holds that a general sentence cannot be imposed for a violation of supervised release, we conclude that the district court did not commit plain error. Accordingly, we affirm Andreu’s sentence.

AFFIRMED. 
      
      . We have held that a general sentence imposed on a judgment of conviction is per se illegal. See United States v. Moriarty, 429 F.3d 1012, 1025 (11th Cir.2005). However, we have never extended the holding of Moriarty to a term of imprisonment imposed on a revocation of supervised release.