Case ID: njl_92/html/0251-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NED K. FINKELSTEIN, RESPONDENT, v. HERMAN GEISMAR, APPELLANT.
    Submitted March 25, 1918
    Decided May 3, 1918.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 91 N. J. L. 46.
    For the respondent, McDermott & Enright.
    
    For the appellant, Weller & Lichtenstein.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal — ISTone.