Case ID: f-appx_697/html/0211-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio R. HALL, a/k/a Mack, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 17-6312
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: August 31, 2017
    Decided: September 18, 2017
    Antonio R. Hall, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr,, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Antonio R. Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. Although the docketed notice of appeal was received after the expiration of the appeal period, Hall asserts that he previously delivered his original notice of appeal to prison officials for mailing on January 20, 2017, within the 60-day appeal period. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B). Because Hall is incarcerated, the notice is considered filed as of the date it was properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988). The record does not conclusively establish that Hall in fact provided a notice of appeal to prison officials for mailing on January 20, 2017. Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to make this finding and to determine whether Hall timely filed his notice of appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED