Case ID: ny-2d_30/html/0768-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of William Rodriguez, a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.
    Submitted April 27, 1972;
    decided May 4, 1972.
    
      Marttie L. Thompson, Arthur D. Meehan and David Rudenstine for appellant.
    
      John A. Murray, John G. De Roos and Helen R. Cassidy for respondent.
   Order reversed and the matter remitted to the Family Court for a new hearing. The respondent [appellant] was entitled to the representation of a lawyer upon th,e hearing (see Family Ct. Act, § 249; Matter of Lawrence S., 29 N Y 2d 206). Petitioner’s [respondent’s] attorney has commendably suggested that, reversal and a new hearing is indicated.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.