Case ID: or-app_131/html/0261-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted October 13, reversed in part;
    affirmed in part November 2,
    petition for review denied December 27,1994 (320 Or 493)
    In the Matter of the Guardianship/Conservatorship for William C. Rochat, an Incapacitated/Protected Person. William C. ROCHAT, Appellant, v. Mary Ellen ROCHAT and Anna L. Carlson, Respondents.
    
    (9305-90736; CA A82273)
    883 P2d 1338
    William Carl Rochat argued the cause and filed the brief pro se.
    
    James R. Cartwright argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.
    Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Landau, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Petitioner appeals from two orders of the Mult-nomah County Circuit Court, one appointing guardians for petitioner and the other appointing conservators. We reject petitioner’s arguments concerning the guardianship. The respondents concede that they did not request a conservator-ship and that the trial court, under the pleadings, should not have appointed conservators.

Order appointing conservators reversed; order appointing guardians affirmed.