Case ID: f-appx_511/html/0234-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Christopher D. ELLERBE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dennis MARSHALL, Assistant Unit Manager; Billy Jean Weaver, Disciplinary Hearing Officer; Heh, Corrections Officer; Nicholson, Corrections Officer; Pressley, Corrections Officer; Bennett, Corrections Officer; Nance, Corrections Officer; Triplett, Corrections Officer; Sturdivant, Corrections Officer; Stanback, Corrections Officer; Gaddy, Corrections Officer; Campbell, Nurse; Eaves, Nurse; Harris, Nurse; Hinkel, Nurse; Kevin T. King, Assistant Superintendent; Santa Lucia, Nurse, Defendants-Appellees, and Boyd Bennett, Director of Prisons, N.C. Department of Corrections; E.D. Wallace, Grievance Examiner; Rick Jackson, Superintendent; Kory Dalrymple, Assistant Superintendent; Jerline Bennett, Program Director I; Glenn Kinney, Assistant Unit Manager; Goodwin, Corrections Officer; Wyatt, Corrections Officer; Marsden, Corrections Officer; Zimmerman, Corrections Officer; Stevens, Nurse; North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services, Inc., Defendants.
    No. 12-7717.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 21, 2013.
    Decided: Feb. 25, 2013.
    Christopher D. Ellerbe, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Yvette Harper, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Mary Margaret Dillon, Ellis & Winters, LLP, Cary, North Carolina; Molly M. Shah, Jerry Howard Walters, Jr., Littler Mendelson PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   PER CURIAM:

Christopher D. Ellerbe appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ellerbe v. Weaver, No. 3:10-cv-00130-RJC, 2012 WL 4321308 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 20, 2012). In addition, we deny Ellerbe’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.