Case ID: cust-ct_1/html/0519-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dallinger, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Before the Second Division,
    December 6, 1938
    No. 40021.
    Protests 768399-G, etc., of D. Lisner & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).
   Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of bottles, boxes, bookends, bottle holders, trays, inkstands, candelabra, vases, atomizers, and' urns chiefly used on the table or in the household for utilitarian purposes or hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.