Case ID: f-appx_100/html/0908-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

S.L., by her mother, Cynthia Lee, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 03-2405.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted April 30, 2004.
    Decided June 17, 2004.
    Cynthia Lee, Appellant pro se.
    Mary Ellen McGowan, Siciliano, Ellis, Dyer & Boccarosse, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM.

S.L., a minor, by her mother, Cynthia Lee, appeals the district court’s order entered on October 27, 2003, denying her motion to reconsider the court’s order denying her motion to set aside the judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See S.L. v. Prince William County School Bd., No. CA-02-1216-A (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 24, 2003 & entered Oct. 27, 2003). We also deny S.L.’s motion to expedite; we grant S.L.’s motion to amend her docketing statement. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED 
      
       Because S.L.’s notice of appeal is not timely as to either the underlying judgment or her first motion to set aside the judgment, we consider the appeal only as it relates to the order entered October 27, 2003.