Case ID: f-appx_471/html/0198-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Nicholas James QUEEN, Sr., Petitioner.
    No. 11-2371.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 4, 2012.
    Decided: April 25, 2012.
    Nicholas James Queen, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Nicholas James Queen, Sr. petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order directing the district court to rule on a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. Our review of the district court’s docket sheet discloses that the court denied the Rule 60(b) motion on March 30, 2012, 2012 WL 1107176. Accordingly, because the district court has ruled on the motion, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.