Case ID: tex-crim_90/html/0260-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "EATTIMORE, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George Palms v. The State.
    No. 6441.
    Decided November 9, 1921.
    Theft — Felony—Practice on Appeal.
    In the absence of a statement of facts and bills of exception, refused requested instructions cannot be considered; and the indictment being good, and the charge of the court in conformity to the law, the judgment must be affirmed.
    
      Appeal from the District Court of Collin. Tried below before the Honorable F. E. Wilcox.
    Appeal from a conviction of theft; penalty, two years.imprisonment in the penitentiary.
    No brief on file for appellant.
    
      R. G. Storey, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
   EATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Collin County of the offense of theft of property of the value of more than fifty dollars, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. There are some questions raised by special charges which were refused, and in the motion for new trial, the correctness of which we can not determine because of the absence of a statement of factg. We have examined the indictment and the charge of the court, which seem to be in conformity with law, and finding no error in the record calling for a reversal an affirmance is ordered.

Affirmed.