Case ID: f-appx_372/html/0050-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bob PETERSON, individually and on behalf of, Fu’s Gold, LLC, John Usher, Deborah Usher, individually and on behalf of, Full Plate, LLC, Jeff Goldt, individually and on behalf of, We 3, Inc., Tony Wong, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants, One Big Mama’s, LLC, Two Big Mama’s, LLC, Howard Goldt, H&J Goldt Corp., Mike Hargreaves, II, Amer Abugherir, individually and on behalf of, Central Florida Land Investments, Inc., RAM003, LLC, David A. Weinberg, individually and on behalf of, Wong Fu’s Noodle House, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, Three Big Mama’s, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, Edmund H. Watkins, III, et al., Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants, v. H. Martin SPROCK, III, Daryl Dollinger, Raving Brands Holdings, Inc., Mama Fu’s Noodle House, Inc., Mama Fu’s Peachtree, LLC, et al., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees, Corporate John Does, X, Y, Z, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 09-11781.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    April 5, 2010.
    K. Brian Roller, Zarco Einhorn Salkow-ski Brito, P.A., Miami, FL, for Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants.
    Robert E. Casey, Jr., Casey, Gilson & Liebel, P.C., Atlanta, GA, Robert Zarco, Robert M. Einhorn, K. Brian Roller, Zarco Einhorn Salkowski & Brito, P.A., Miami, FL, Robert E. Casey, Jr., George P. Shin-gler, Christopher M. Huffines, Casey, Gil-son & Liebel, P.C., Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    Scott A. McIntosh, John F. Dienelt, DLA Piper U.S. LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appel-lees.
    Before BIRCH and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and BUCKLEW, District Judge.
    
      
       Honorable Susan C. Bucklew, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM:

After careful review of the record and briefs of the parties, as well as having had the benefit of oral argument, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.