Case ID: so2d_571/html/1269-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MADDOX, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte Thomas Geary GRAHAM. (Re State of Alabama v. Thomas Geary Graham).
    89-1024.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Oct. 26, 1990.
    Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and Margaret S. Childers, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    Gary L. Phillips, Gadsden, for Thomas Geary Graham.
   MADDOX, Justice.

By quashing the writ, we should not be understood as approving or disapproving the language used, or the statements of law contained, in the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals. 571 So.2d 1267. Cf. Cooper v. State, 287 Ala. 728, 252 So.2d 108 (1971).

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and ALMON, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.