Case ID: ri-dec_10/html/0088-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "CHURCHILL, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ruth Peters vs. United Electric Railways Co.
    No. 87232.
    October 4, 1933.
    For plaintiff: Hogan & Hogan.
    For defendant: Clifford Whipple,' Earl Sweeney'.
   CHURCHILL, J.

Heard on motion to file additional count.

Inasmuch as the plaintiff did not accompany her motion with a copy of the proposed additional count, or otherwise give the substance of the proposed count, the Court is unable to rule on the matter.

The motion is therefore denied but without prejudice to the right of the plaintiff to renew such motion when accompanied by a copy of the proposed additional count.