Case ID: so2d_498/html/1066-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Irving BERKOWITZ, Appellant, v. HOLLAND & KNIGHT, Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A., and Chicago Title Insurance Company, Appellees.
    No. 85-2822.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Dec. 24, 1986.
    
      Larry Klein of Klein & Beranek, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Rex Conrad and Valerie Shea of Conrad, Scherer & James, Fort Lauderdale, for ap-pellee-Holland & Knight.
    Terrence J. Russell and Thomas R. Bolf of Ruden, Barnett, McClosky, Schuster & Russell, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appel-lee-Barnett Bank.
    Paul R. Regensdorf of Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee-Chicago Title Insurance Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Reversed. We believe the appellant’s amended complaint stated a cause of action for tortious interference with an existing contractual relationship against all of the appellees. See Wackenhut Corporation v. Maimone, 389 So.2d 656 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), rev. denied, 411 So.2d 383 (Fla.1981).

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.