Case ID: f-appx_713/html/0350-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jason RAZIEN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. MICRO FOCUS (US), INCORPORATED; Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Defendants-Appellees
    No. 17-50724 Summary Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Filed February 23, 2018
    Kaushik Rambhotla, Esq., Rambhotla Law Firm, P.L.L.C., Austin, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant
    Thomas Martin Fulkerson, Esq., Fulk-erson Lotz, L.L.P., Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellee Micro Focus (US), Incorporated
    Darren Glenn Gibson, Salvador Davila, Littler Mendelson, P.C., Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellee Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Jason Razien appeals the dismissal of his Title VII complaint. The court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs, complaint, and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no error of law or reversible error of fact. The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED for essentially the same reasons articulated by that court. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.