Case ID: f-appx_615/html/0814-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bruce W. KOENIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. K. CORTEZ; Jeffrey Brewer; R. Adkins; F. Shambaugh; G. Mckenzie; Bobby Shearin, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 15-6094.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 9, 2015.
    Decided: Sept. 11, 2015.
    
      Bruce Wayne Koenig, Appellant Pro Se. Gina Marie Smith, Meyers, Rodbell & Rosenbaum, P.A., Riverdale, Maryland; Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bruce W. Koenig appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and related claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Koenig v. Cortez, No. l:13-cv-03603-JFM, 2014 WL 7409720 (D.Md. Dec. 30, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.