Case ID: njl_3/html/0463-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pennington, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHIDESTER against DRAKE.
    OS OEKTIOBABI.
    
      JRunyan, attorney for plaintiff.
   Pennington, J.

The first, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth errors assigned, are not supported by the [*] record. The second and fourth, state no cause of reversal, even if true. The third complains of insufficiency in the state of demand, which consists of a single charge, of a balance on settlement of account, on or about [658] the 29th December, 1810, $30.04, which is fully sufficient. I am of opinion, that judgment be affirmed.

The other judges concurred.

Judgment affirmed.

Cited is Carter v. Lackey, Spenc. 608.