Case ID: f-appx_225/html/0128-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Riley ALEXANDER, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-4813.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 30, 2007.
    Decided: May 4, 2007.
    
      Peter Adolf, Federal Defenders of Western North Carolina, Inc., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Amy E. Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

James Riley Alexander was found guilty of violating his supervised release and was sentenced to sixty months of imprisonment, the top of his advisory Sentencing Guidelines range. On appeal, Alexander alleges that his sentence was erroneous. Because we find that Alexander’s sentence is not plainly unreasonable, United States v. Crudup, 461 F.3d 433, 437 (4th Cir.2006) (stating review standard), we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.