Case ID: ad2d_94/html/0651-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloom, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Arthur Rothenberg, Respondent, v David Lowey et al., Appellants.
   Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Greenfield, J.), entered on February 5, 1982 unanimoüsly affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Concur — Carro, J. P., Fein, Lynch and Kassal, JJ.

Bloom, J.,

concurs in a memorandum as follows: While I am in agreement with the conclusion reached at Special Term, I am constrained to point out that since the subject of the suit is “wages” rather than “wage supplements” the governing section of the Labor Law is section 198-a and not section 198-c. Although both sections are penal in nature, the law is plain that the statute gives rise to a right of civil action in addition to a right to proceed criminally (cf. Sasso v Millbrook Enterprises, 108 Misc 2d 562; Goldstein v Mangana, 99 Misc 2d 523; Courtney v Brooklyn & Queens Allied Oil Burner Corp., 112 Misc 2d 89). By its terms-section 198-a imposes liability not only on the corporation but upon “the officers and agents of [the] corporation who knowingly- permit the corporation to violate this chapter by failing to pay the wages of any of its employees”. Accordingly, the result reached at Special Term was correct.