Case ID: f-appx_189/html/0950-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eric J. RHETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Commissioner Beatrice DISMAN, Debbie Myers, Welfare Director Bruce Henderson, Fadi J. Bejjani, M.D., Douglas D. Bradley, M.D., Hi-Tech Training School, Monica Mehta, M.D., Howard Pecker, M.D. and Thalody Medical Associates, Defendants-Appellees, and Gerard P. Deveaux, DefendantAppellee, and Cynthia Nowlin, Defendant-Appellee, and Mary Nowlin, Defendant-Appellee, and Arnold L. Koster, Defendant-Appellee, and Appeals Council—SSA and Office of Hearing and Appeals—SSA, Defendants-Appellees, and Union County Division of Social Services, Defendant-Appellee. Eric J. Rhett, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Union County Division of Social Services, Defendant-Appellee, and Hi-Tech Training School, Debbie Myers, Bruce A Henderson, Fadi J. Bejjani, M.D., Douglas D. Bradley, M.D., Commissioner Beatrice Disman, Monica Mehta, M.D., Howard Pecker, M.D., and Thalody Medical Associates, Defendants-Appellees, and Appeals Council—SSA and Office of Hearing and Appeals—SSA, Defendants-Appellees.
    Nos. 2006-1460, 2006-1461.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    June 27, 2006.
    Eric J. Rhett, pro se.
    Cynthia Nowlin, pro se.
    Mary Nowlin, pro se.
    Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, LINN and DYK, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of these recently docketed appeals, the court considers whether the appeals should be transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Eric J. Rhett sued the defendants in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey regarding Social Security benefits and medical concerns. In one case, district court case no. 02-5539, the district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. In the other case, district court case no. 03-0950, the district court had previously dismissed the complaint. Rhett filed an amended complaint and various motions. The district court dismissed the amended complaint, denied the motions, and barred future filings without leave of court. In both cases, Rhett had previously appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Rhett now appeals the judgment in district court case no. 02-5539 and the order dismissing his amended complaint in 03-0950, seeking review by this court.

These appeals are clearly not within this court’s jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1295. Thus, we transfer the appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The appeals are transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.