Case ID: ad2d_155/html/0517-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stacey E. Kruize, Respondent, v Christopher Kruize, Appellant.
   — In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Delaney, J.), entered November 29, 1988, which denied his motion to compel the plaintiff wife to answer certain questions propounded at an examination before trial.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs (see, Roberts v Módica, 102 AD2d 886; Hughson v St. Francis Hosp., 93 AD2d 491). Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.