Case ID: misc_18/html/0728-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SUPREME COURT —APPELLATE TERM
    —OCTOBER, 1896. .
    Isabella Horowitz, Respondent, v. The Hamburg American Packet Co., Appellant.
    Motion for leave to appeal to .the Appellate Division.
    J. J. Frank, for motion.
    Mashbir & Cukor, opposed.
   Per Curiam

We consider that the point in respect to which the justices of this term differed, viz., whether the question of permanent injuries- should have been submitted to the jury in. the absence of the evidence of medical experts; is of sufficient importance to justify the granting of the motion.

Motion granted' upon condition that the appellant files a stipulation that for the purpose of such appeal it will waive all objections to the judgment except those which raised that point.

Present: Daly, P. J., MoAdam and Bischoff, JJ.

Motion granted;