Case ID: f-appx_222/html/0668-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lorenzo Eulogio MORALES; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 05-73101.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 20, 2007.
    
    Filed Feb. 27, 2007.
    Jorge I. Rodriguez-Choi, Esq., San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners.
    Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Virginia Lum, Anthony W. Norwood, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Margaret A. O’Donnell, Esq., U.S. DOJ-Office of Enforcement Operations Criminal Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    
      Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Lorenzo Eulogio Morales, Ana Del Carmen Olcese Panduro, and Lorenzo Andre Morales Olcese, natives and citizens of Peru, petition for review from the denial of asylum. Because the Board of Immigration Appeals adopted the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision, we review the IJ’s decision for substantial evidence, and we deny the petition. See Molina-Estrada v. INS, 293 F.3d 1089, 1093 (9th Cir.2002).

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s finding that the unfulfilled threats of the Shining Path guerillas described by Morales did not establish past persecution. See Lim v. INS, 224 F.3d 929, 936 (9th Cir.2000). In addition, we conclude that the IJ properly found that Morales has not shown a well-founded fear of future persecution.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.