Case ID: so2d_334/html/0134-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LEATHERBY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Barbara M. MATHERLY, and Earl W. Matherly, her husband, Appellees.
    No. 76-140.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 22, 1976.
    Prunty, Ross, DeLoach & Olsen, Miami, for appellant.
    Frates, Floyd, Pearson, Stewart, Proenza & Richman and George E. Schulz, Jr., Miami, for appellees.
    Before HENDRY and NATHAN, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal by defendant from an order of the circuit court granting partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs, appellees, on the issue of liability.

We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal and have found that it discloses that there are issues of material fact which have not been eliminated by movants so as to entitle them to a partial summary.

Summary judgments are proper only where there is no genuine issue of material fact to be tried. Anderson v. Aamco Transmissions of Brevard, Inc., Fla.1972, 265 So.2d 5; Connell v. Sledge, Fla.App.1975, 306 So.2d 194.

For the reasons stated partial summary judgment should not have been granted.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.