Case ID: idaho_99/html/0827-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

589 P.2d 979
    STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David Allen DALRYMPLE, Defendant-Respondent.
    No. 12498.
    Supreme Court of Idaho.
    Jan. 30, 1979.
    
      David H. Leroy, Atty. Gen., Lynn E. Thomas, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, for plaintiff-appellant.
    Daniel T. Eismann, Homedale, for defendant-respondent.
    Before SHEPARD, C. J., DONALDSON, BAKES and BISTLINE, JJ., and SCOGGIN, J. Pro Tern.
   PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the State from a district court order dismissing the criminal complaint against the defendant on grounds that he had been denied his right to a speedy trial.

We have reviewed the record in this case and have found no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in dismissing the criminal complaint. Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972); State v. Lindsay, 96 Idaho 747, 531 P.2d 236 (1975). The order is affirmed.