Case ID: ind-app_29/html/0704-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam. Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company v. Greb.
    [No. 3,738.
    Filed October 10, 1901.
    Rehearing denied May 22, 1902. ]
    Prom Porter Circuit Court; J. II. Gillelt, Judge.
    Action by Carl Greb against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    
      N. O. Ross and G. B. Ross, for appellant.
    
      H. S. Barr, J. Kopelke and T. II. Heard, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of tlic trial court is in all things hereby affirmed.

On Petition Eor Rehearing.

Pee Cueiam.

No new reasons are advanced in appellant’s petition for a rehearing, why the judgment in this cause should be reversed. The motion to make more specific is not in any proper way a part of the record, so that no question is raised upon the action of the trial court in overruling this motion.

The complaint is sufficient. It charges the appellant with negligently permitting the fire to escape from its premises; it avers that' appellee was without fault. Upon these averments the evidence went to the jury and the jury by its general verdict decided both issues in favor of appellee. The evidence was sufficient upon which the verdict and judgment could legally rest, and the general verdict and facts specially found are not irreconcilable.

The petition for a rehearing is overruled.