Case ID: nys_146/html/1088-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CROWE, Respondent, v. MATTES, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    March 6, 1914.)
    Appeal from Special Term, New York County. Action by James J. Crowe against William F. Mattes. From an order denying a motion to vacate an order for examination of defendant before trial, defendant appeals.
    Reversed, and motion granted in part.
    Louis Y. Ebert, of New York City, for appellant.
    Lloyd M. Howell, of New York City, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Order appealed from reversed, and motion granted, to the extent that defendant’s examination will be limited to the question whether or not the purchaser, Skaake, claimed to have been produced by plaintiff, was presented to the defendant by said plaintiff, and the- question as to the price at which defendant sold and. conveyed his café and saloon business to said Skaake, without costs to either party.