Case ID: f-appx_451/html/0281-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angelo SHERMAN, a/k/a Angel Sherman, a/k/a Rodney Lamar Gibbs, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 11-6736.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 18, 2011.
    Decided: Oct. 21, 2011.
    Angelo Sherman, Appellant Pro Se. Brent Alan Gray, Office of the United States Attorney, Sean Kittrell, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Angelo Sherman appeals the district court’s summary order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b)(5) motion asking the district court to reconsider the length of his criminal sentence. Because the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not apply to Sherman’s criminal matter, and since Sherman cites no authority authorizing the district court to reduce his sentence nearly seven years after it was imposed, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Sherman, No. 2:04-cr-00303-PMD-1 (D.S.C. May 23, 2011); see also United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235 n. * (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3530, 177 L.Ed.2d 1110 (2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.