Case ID: f-appx_71/html/0242-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Misrak AYALEW, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 02-2232.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted July 29, 2003.
    Decided Aug. 12, 2003.
    
      Mikre-Michael Ayelle, Arlington, VA, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Linda S. Wernery, Senior Litigation, John M. McAdams, Jr., Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Misrak Ayalew, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) order denying her motion to reconsider and reconsider en banc. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Ayalew’s motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2003); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Ayalew, No. [ AXXXXX-XXX ] (B.I.A. Sept. 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.