Case ID: nj-eq_46/html/0609-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lorenzo Hupsch, appellant, v. Mary Resch, respondent.
    On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Pitney, whose opinion is reported in Hupsch v. Resch, 18 Stew. Eq. 657.
    
    
      Mr. R. V. IAndabury, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. S. B. Ransom, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Magie, Reed, Van Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, Smith, Whitaker —:io.

For reversal — None.