Case ID: ind-app_92/html/0536-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Kime, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stults, Receiver, v. Bank of Linn Grove et al.
    [No. 13,991.
    Filed June 18, 1931.]
    
      Abram Simmons and Virgil M. Simmons, for appellant.
    
      Eichhorn, Gordon & Edris, for appellees.
   Kime, J.

This is an appeal from the same judgment appealed from in the case of Bank of Linn Grove v. Stults, Rec. (1931), 176 N. E. (Ind. App.) 707. In fact, this case was filed in this court before that one.

It is called to our attention by a verified motion filed in Bank of Linn Grove v. Stults, Rec., supra, that the appellant here has voluntarily released, satisfied and accepted the benefit of the judgment appealed from. It appears conclusively that this controversy has been settled and appellant has no further interest therein. Ogborn v. City of New Castle (1912), 178 Ind. 161, 98 N. E. 869, and cases- cited; South Park Floral Co. v. Garvey (1915), 182 Ind. 635, 107 N. E. 68; Payne v. Peugh (1913), 54 Ind. App. 551, 103 N. E. 117; Howard v. Happell (1914), 181 Ind. 165, 103 N. E. 1065; Chicago, etc., Co. v. Lewis, Rec. (1901), 156 Ind. 232, 59 N. E. 466; State, ex rel., v. Indianapolis Gas Co. (1904), 163 Ind. 48, 71 N. E. 139.

For the above reason this appeal is dismissed, at the cost of the appellant.