Case ID: njl_112/html/0500-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ANNA SOKIERA, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM, RESPONDENT, v. H. A. JAEGER, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT.
    Argued February 9, 1934
    Decided April 12, 1934.
    
      For the respondent, Martin P. O’Connor.
    
    For the appellant, McDermott, Enright Ac Carpenter.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Dill, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.