Case ID: kan_24/html/0571-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Henry E. Russell, et al., v. Isaac Hudson.
    Ejectment, brought in the district court of Wilson county by Hudson against R. G. Chitwood and wife, and Joshua Chitwood and wife, to recover the possession of certain lands situate in that county — the plaintiff’s title thereto being based upon certain tax deeds. The two first above-named defendants were afterward discharged from the action, and Russell was made a party defendant in their stead. Judgment for the plaintiff, at the February Term, 1880, of the district court. The defendants bring the case here.
    
      Gillett & Forde, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      8. 8. Kirhpatrich, for defendant in error.
   Per Curiam:

The judgment of the court below in this case will be reversed, upon the authority of the decision made in the case of Corbin v. Young, ante, p. 198, first point in the syllabus. See Gen. Stat. of 1868, p. 1046, §81; Laws of 1869, p. 240, §1; Laws of 1874, p. 207, §3; Laws of 1876, p. 85, §106; Comp. Laws of 1879, p. 960, § 106. The statutes of Kansas, since 1868, and before, have required that the place of sale of lands for delinquent taxes shall be stated in the county treasurer’s notice of sale. This cause will be remanded to the court below for further proceedings.