Case ID: njl_119/html/0025-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CARL WIRTH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Submitted May 28, 1937
    Decided September 22, 1937.
    
      For the appellant, Messrs. Collins & Corbin.
    
    For the respondent, Nathan Baker.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Perskie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.