Case ID: nys_18/html/0934-08.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

People ex rel. Putzel, Respondent, v. Simonson et al., Appellants.
    
      (Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.
    
    February 18, 1892.)
    On reargument as to costs. Modified. See 17 N. Y. Supp. 595, mem. See, also, 16 N. Y. Supp. 118; 18 N. Y. Supp. 37.
    Argued before Van Brunt, P. J., and Patterson and O’Brien, JJ.
    
      Chas. T. Eaviland, for appellants. Archibald L. Sessions, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

It was the intention of the court upon the previous reversal to grant only motion costs, which would amount to $20, and disbursements. ’ Ordered accordingly.