Case ID: f-appx_101/html/0716-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Paul Michael PHILLIPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 03-56978.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 14, 2004.
    
    Decided June 22, 2004.
    Paul Michael Phillips, One Thousand Oaks, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    
      Leon W. Weidman, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before: LEAVY, THOMAS and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Paul Phillips appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing, for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the orders of the court, his action against the United States. In his brief Phillips states that former Maumee City Judge Wendell Allen should be prosecuted because he “used mental programming technique[s]” on Phillips when he was a child.

We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s Order of Dismissal filed on October 29, 2003.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.