Case ID: f2d_246/html/0675-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Otto STRAEHLER, Appellant, v. Herbert BROWNELL, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Appellee.
    No. 13605.
    United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
    Argued May 15, 1957.
    Decided June 13, 1957.
    George Eric Rosden, Washington, for appellant.
    Irwin A. Seibel, Atty., Dept, of e, with whom Mr. George B. Searls iss Marbeth A. Miller, Attys., Dept, tice, were on the brief, for appellee.
    re Edgerton, Chief Judge, and “MAN and Fahy, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

is an action under § 34(e) of the ? with the Enemy Act, 40 Stat. amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 34(e), to review the Attorney General’s partial disallowance of a debt claim asserted against property vested under the Act. The plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment for the defendant. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.