Case ID: f-appx_504/html/0923-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DEEP9 CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BARNES & NOBLE, INC., and Barnesandnoble.Com, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 2013-1031.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    May 13, 2013.
    
      Christian E. Mammen, Hogan Lovells US, LLP, of San Francisco, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel on the brief were Erie B. Fastiff and David T. Rudolph, Lieff, Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, of San Francisco, CA; and Kim D. Stephens and Chase Alvord, Tousley Brain Stephens, PLLC, of Seattle, WA.
    John B. Quinn, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, of Los Angeles, CA, argued for defendants-appellees. Of counsel on the brief were David Eiseman and Jeffrey S. Gerchick, of Washington, DC; and Melissa J. Baily, of San Francisco, CA.
    DYK, O’MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.