Case ID: f-appx_674/html/0956-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard ADAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Avery NILES, Commissioner, L. Gale Buckner, Commissioner, Amy Howell, Commissioner, Sarah Draper, Deputy Commissioner, Clay Seabolt, Deputy Commissioner, et al., Defendant-Appellees.
    No. 16-13221 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Filed (January 17, 2017)
    Sidney Leighton Moore, III, The Sum-merville Firm, LLC, Atlanta, GA, Demetra Duan Ford, Ford Law, LLC, Atlanta, GA, Thomas G. Sampson, Thomas Gatewood Sampson, II, Thomas Kennedy Sampson & Tompkins, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant
    Roger A. Chalmers, Attorney General’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appel-lees Avery Niles, L. Gale Buckner, Amy V. Howell, Sarah Draper
    Annarita Leigh McGovern, Kathleen Simcoe, Derrick Lee Bingham, Owen Glea-ton Egan Jones & Sweeney, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellee Clay Seabolt
    Before TJOFLAT, HULL and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

We affirm the district court’s grant of the defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiffs complaint on the basis of Georgia’s statute of limitations and Georgia’s renewal statute, Ga. Code Ann. § 9-2-6, based on the district court’s thorough and well-reasoned order dated May 23, 2016.

AFFIRMED.