Case ID: wv-ct-cl_21/html/0030-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

OPINION ISSUED SEPTEMBER 26, 1995
    
    PHYLLIS N. VOORHEES VS. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    (CC-95-184)
    Claimant represents self.
    Carol A. Egnatoff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent's Answer.

Claimant, an employee of the respondent, seeks $972.00 which represents the portion of her increment increase which she did not receive during a ten year period when the amount of her increment increase was incorrectly calculated by respondent. In its Answer, the respondent admits the validity and amount of the claim, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal years with which the correct amount of increment increase could have been paid to the claimant.

In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award in the amount of $972.00.

Award of $972.00.