Case ID: njl_131/html/0328-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MINNIE F. COHEN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, v. MAX KAFER, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT.
    Submitted February 11, 1944
    Decided March 23, 1944.
    For the prosecutor-appellant, Howard Eastwood.
    
    For the defendant-respondent, Parsons, Labrecque & Borden.
    
   Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court in a workman’s compensation case. The case as presented is purely one of fact. There being testimony to support the finding of the Supreme Court, this court will not weigh the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Porter for the Supreme Court.

For uffirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bobine, Donges, Heiier, Perskie, Colie, Dear, Wells, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.