Case ID: pa_396/html/0063-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Pappas v. Keely, Appellant.
    Argued May 5, 1959.
    Before Jones, C. J., Bell, Jones, Cohen and McBride, JJ.
    
      
      John G. Glemmens, with him Body, Rhoda, Stoudt & Bradley, for appellant.
    
      Alan M. Hawman, Jr.,, with him Derr, Hawman and Derr, for appellee.
    May 28, 1959:
   Opinion

Pee Curiam,

These appeals by the defendant, in her individual and representative capacities, are from an order removing a compulsory nonsuit and granting the plaintiff a new trial. Such an order is plainly interlocutory and unappealable. The appeals will, therefore, be quashed. Szmigel v. Director General of Railroads, 266 Pa. 573, 110 A. 639; see also Dellacasse v. Floyd, 332 Pa. 218, 221, 2 A. 2d 860; and DiGregorio v. Skinner, 351 Pa. 441, 446, 41 A. 2d 649.

Appeals quashed.