Case ID: ohio-st-3d_76/html/0107-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pfeifer, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Casas et al., Appellants.
    [Cite as State v. Casas (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 107.]
    (No. 96-679
    — Submitted April 30, 1996
    — Decided July 24, 1996.)
    
      Dunn & Hare Co., L.P.A., and Kevin W. Dunn, for appellants.
   The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Dayton v. Erickson (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 3, 665 N.E.2d 1091.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, J.,

dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Dayton v. Erickson (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 3, 12, 665 N.E.2d 1091, 1098.