Case ID: minn_294/html/0555-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE v. DAVID BRUNSBERG.
    201 N. W. 2d 824.
    October 27, 1972
    No. 42735.
    
      C. Paul Jones, State Public Defender, and Doris 0. Huspeni, Assistant State Public Defender, for appellant.
    
      Warren Spannaus, Attorney General, Curtis D. Forslund, Solicitor General, and Frank W. Levin and Thomas L. Fabel, Special Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
    Heard before Knutson, C. J., and Otis, Rogosheske, and Schultz, JJ.
   Per Curiam.

Defendant, convicted of indecent liberties, Minn. St. 609.296, subd. 1, contends on this appeal that (1) he met his burden of proving he was insane at the time he committed the act in question; (2) the trial court erred in limiting the scope of cross-examination of prosecution witnesses and in instructing the jury; and (3) the prosecutor made a prejudicially improper closing argument to the jury. After careful consideration of the record and argument of counsel, we find none of these contentions merits discussion.

Affirmed.