Case ID: so3d_208/html/1253-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William PESTLE, Ph.D., Appellant, v. CITY OF MIAMI, et al., Appellees.
    No. 3D15-2050
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed January 25, 2017
    Ralf Brookes (Cape Coral); Robert N. Hartsell and Sarah M. Hayter (Pompano Beach), for appellant.
    Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alha-deff & Sitterson, P.A., and Eugene Stearns, Grace L. Mead, Maria A. Fehret-dinov and Veronica L. de Zayas, for MDM Development, LLC, and MDM Retail, Ltd.; Victoria Méndez, City Attorney, and Forrest L. Andrews, Assistant City Attorney, for City of Miami, appellees.
    Before EMAS and SCALES, JJ., and SHEPHERD, Senior Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sarasota Citizens for Responsible Gov’t v. City of Sarasota, 48 So.3d 755 (Fla. 2010) (finding private negotiations between deputy county administrator and members of the county board of commissioners, conducted for purposes of developing memorandum of understanding, did not violate Sunshine Law as no final action was taken and any violation would have been cured by subsequent pub-lically noticed meeting of the board); Tolar v. Sch. Bd. of Liberty Cnty., 398 So.2d 427, 429 (Fla. 1981) (“The Board’s action was not merely a ceremonial acceptance of secret actions and was not merely a perfunctory ratification of secret decisions at a later meeting open to the public.”).