Case ID: f-appx_46/html/0214-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles A. GULDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas E. WHITE, Secretary, United States Department of the Army, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 02-1675.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 9, 2002.
    Decided Sept. 24, 2002.
    Charles A. Gulden, Appellant Pro Se. Francis Patrick King, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
    
      Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Charles A. Gulden appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Gulden v. White, No. CA-01-1519 (E.D.Va. May 7, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.