Case ID: hilt_1/html/0530-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HiltoN, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Florence Desmond v. Charles A. Rice and James E. Barker.
    In an action upon negot able paper, which has been lost, the giving of a bond under 'the statute (2 R. S. 406, § 16), with sufficient sureties, conditioned to indemnify the defendant against all claims by any other persons on account thereof, is an essential pre-requisite to any recovery thereon.
    
      Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the Fourth District Court. The action was upon two orders for $10 each, negotiable, given, the one to Cornelius Desmond and the otfier to Kob-ert Williams, and both assigned to the plaintiff. The drafts were lost by the plaintiff, and were not produced on the trial, nor was any bond of indemnity against them tendered. It did not appear that the defendants made any objection to the recovery upon that specific ground, or demanded a bond. Judgment was ran-' dered for the plaintiff, from which the defendants appealed.
    
      Beebe, Bean and Donohue, for the' appellants.
    
      G. N. Reynolds, for the respondent.
   HiltoN, J.

— As a general rule, this court will, upon appeals from inferior courts, disregard all objections not taken at the trial, nor distinctly specified in the notice of appeal; but we do net consider this case one to which this rule should be applied. Here the drafts, or orders sued on, were negotiable; and, it appealing at the trial that they were lost, parol evidence Avas given of their contents. Under such circumstances, the loss being distinctly proved, to entitle the plaintiff to recover, he Avas required to execute a bond to the defendants, in a penalty at least double the amount of the drafts or orders, Avith two sureties, to be approved by the court in Avhich the trial Avas had, conditioned to indemnify, &c., against all claims by any other person on account of such drafts, and against all costs and expenses by reason of such claim. 2 R. S. 406, § 76.

The giving of this bond was a pre-requisite to any recovery against the defendants upon the drafts, and the return not showing affirmatively that any such bond was given, the judgment must therefore be reversed.

Judgment reversed.