Case ID: so2d_179/html/0210-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Peter ARIS, Petitioner, v. BIG TEN TAXI CORPORATION, Employers Service Corporation, Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
    No. 34590.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Oct. 20, 1965.
    Howard Silverstein, of Silverstein, Nach-walter, Livedis & Brush, Miami, for petitioner.
    Preddy & Haddad, Miami, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date Tune 24, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

It is further ordered that the petitioner’s petition for allowance of attorneys’ fees be and the same is hereby denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.