Case ID: cust-ct_60/html/1005-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Landis, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. P68/89.
    protest 62/16073 (New York).
    Bar Zel Expediters v. United States,
   Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of shoivcase locks in chief value of brass, steel, or iron; that following the principle of Shriro Trading Corp. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 422, C.D. 2669), said locks are not locks of cylinder or pin tumbler construction; and that said locks are not cabinet locks or padlocks, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.