Case ID: neb_17/html/0373-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "By the Court.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John S. Gregory, plaintiff in error, v. Asa S. Edgerly, defendant in error.
    ¡Practice in Supreme Court. Assignments of error Which in any manner bring before the court a question presented by the record -will not be stricken out of the petition in error.
   By the Court.

The defendant moves to strike certain assignments of error out of the petition in error, upon the ground that they are not authorized by the record. When improper assignments are made they may be stricken out of the petition as irrelevant matter. This practice, however, is not favored, because only the errors relied upon by the plaintiff in error in his brief will be considered, the others being deemed waived. But in no case will the court strike out assignments of error where they in any manner bring before the court a question or questions presented by the record. The assignments of error in this case seem to be justified by the record, and therefore, are not irrelevant. The motion is overruled.

Brown & Ryan Brothers, for the motion.

John 8. Gregory, contra.

Motion overruled.