Case ID: nys_143/html/1116-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CITRIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ENGINEER CO. v. HERRING-HALL-MARVIN CO.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    October 24, 1913.)
    Appeal from Trial Term, New York County. Action by the Engineer Company against the Herring-Hall-Marvin Company. From a judgment for pIainti~, and denial of new trial, defendant appeals. Affirmed. Harry W. Forbes, of New York City, for appellant. .Tames W. Monk, of New York City, for respondent.
   PER CITRIAM.

This court on the former appeal (154 App. Div. 123, 138 N. Y. Supp. 881) held that there was a question for the jury. The case now having been submitted to the jury, who have found a verdict for the plainti~, which is supported by the evidence, the judgment is therefore affirmed. .Tudgment and order affirmed, with costs.