Case ID: f-appx_502/html/0628-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stephanie A. MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Patrick R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service; Mailhandler Union, Local 297, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 12-2597.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 19, 2013.
    Filed: April 22, 2013.
    Stephanie A. Martin, Kansas City, KS, pro se.
    Thomas M. Larson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, MO (Tammy Dickinson, U.S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee Patrick R. Donahoe.
    Lori D. Elrod, Blake & Uhlig, P.A., Kansas City, MO, for appellee Mailhandler Union, Local 297.
    Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Stephanie Martin appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment in her pro se Title VII employment-discrimination action. Upon careful de novo review, see Tusing v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 639 F.3d 507, 514 (8th Cir.2011), this court finds no basis for reversal and concludes that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Martin’s motions for appointment of counsel. See Phillips v. Jasper County Jail, 437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir.2006) (district court’s denial of appointed counsel will be reversed only if it constitutes abuse of discretion). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.