Case ID: ad_212/html/0829-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mildred Leder and Another, Appellants, v. Louis Skaletsky and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with George Shifter, Respondent.
   Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs, on the ground that the defense of usury is personal to the borrower (Terminal Bank v. Dubroff, 66 Misc. 100), and is not available to the respondent. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.