Case ID: nj-eq_111/html/0356-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Commercial Casualty Insurance Company et al., appellants, v. Southern Surety Company, respondent.
    [Decided October 17th, 1932.]
    
      Messrs'. McCarter ■& English, for the appellants.
    
      Messrs. Bum, Tamblyn <& Colyer, for the respondent.
   Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baekes, and printed in 9 N. J. Mis. R. 687.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Teenohaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Beogan, Van Buskiek, Kays, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Hone.