Case ID: sw3d_210/html/0310-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. James ISBELL, Appellant.
    No. ED 86996.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Oct. 24, 2006.
    Motion For Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 4, 2006.
    Application for Transfer Denied Jan. 30, 2007.
    Lawrence Gillespie, Clayton, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Roger W. Johnson, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Isbell (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction of one count of sexual misconduct involving a child. Defendant claims the trial court erred in entering its judgment because there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 80.25(b).