Case ID: so2d_429/html/0840-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael J. FINGAR and E. Neal Bonavia, Appellants, v. Roger A. LEVINE and Laura E. Levine, his wife, Appellees.
    No. 82-1318.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 19, 1983.
    Michael J. Fingar, Miami, for appellants.
    Mark Perlman, Fort Lauderdale, for ap-pellees.
    Before HENDRY, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the trial court in favor of the appellees on the appellants’ action for specific performance of a contract to sell real estate is affirmed upon a holding that the contract, as the trial court correctly concluded, lacked the clarity, definiteness, and certainty required for specific performance, see, e.g., Bay Club, Inc. v. Brickell Bay Club, Inc., 293 So.2d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), and that these deficiencies were not overcome by any evidence which would support a contrary conclusion, notwithstanding that the appellants were placed on notice of the necessity of presenting such evidence and failed to avail themselves of the opportunity to do so.

Affirmed.