Case ID: so_169/html/0614-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RUDISILL v. TYLER.
    Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.
    Aug. 3, 1936.
    James J. Jackson, of Cocoa, for plaintiff in error.
    Carr'& Carr, of Miami, for defendant in error.
   PER CURIAM.

This is the second appearance of this case in this court. See Tyler v. Rudisill, 114 Fla. 801, 155 So. 353.

The opinion adopted by this court, supra, became the law of the case. The court below applied the 'law as stated in that opinion in the subsequent proceedings in the court below, and judgment was rendered accordingly.

It follows that the judgment be affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

ELLIS, P. J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, JJ., concur.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and BROWN and DAVIS, JJ., concur -in the. opinion and judgment.