Case ID: sw_227/html/0322-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "LATTIMORE, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ARMSTRONG v. STATE.
    (No. 6038.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Jan. 26, 1921.)
    Criminal law &wkey;> 1094 — Conviction of defendant who pleaded guilty affirmed in absence of statement of facts or bills of exceptions.
    Where defendant charged with unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor pleaded guilty, and his punishment was fixed at the minimum penalty for such offense, the Court of Criminal Appeals will not consider his appeal, in absence of statement of facts or bills of exceptions, but will affirm the judgment.
    Appeal from District Court, Camp County; J. A. Ward, Judge.
    Winfrey Armstrong was convicted of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Alvin M. Owsley, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   LATTIMORE, J.

In this case appellant was convicted of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year. It appears from the record that appellant entered his plea of guilty and his punishment was fixed by the jury at the minimum penalty fixed for the offense charged in the indictment. Appellant having pleaded gMlty, and there being no statement of facts or bills of exceptions in the record, there appears nothing before us to consider.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Grandberry v. State, 216 S. W. 164; Gipson v. State, 216 S. W. 870.