Case ID: sw3d_377/html/0612-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LVNV FUNDING, LLC, Respondent, v. Carol LAMPKINS, Appellant.
    No. ED 96900.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Sept. 4, 2012.
    Patrie Alexander Lester, Lester and Associates, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Michael Joseph Payne, Frankel, Rubin, Bond, et al., Clayton, MO, for respondent.
    Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carol Lampkins (Lampkins) appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of LVNV Funding, LLC, (LVNV) on LVNV’s petition to collect a credit card debt from Lampkins. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).