Case ID: f-appx_348/html/0312-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo FLORES-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-50582.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 14, 2009 .
    Filed Oct. 13, 2009.
    Bruce R. Castetter, Randy K. Jones, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Marc B. Geller, Esquire, Marc B. Geller, Attorney at Law, APC, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Ricardo Flores-Gareia appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Flores-Gareia contends that the district court failed to consider properly all of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors when it sentenced him, thereby rendering his sentence unreasonable. Our review of the record shows that the district court considered all of the factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) when it sentenced Flores-Gar-eia, and sentenced him in accordance with those factors. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc). Accordingly, we conclude the district court’s 65-month sentence was reasonable.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.