Case ID: f-appx_406/html/0816-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Mary PENLAND, Petitioner—Appellant, and 326 Hansa Lane Greer SC; 4318 East North Street; Kenneth C. Anthony, Jr., Parties-in-interest, and Charles W. Penland, Sr., Defendant, and Jerry Saad, Receiver.
    No. 10-7069.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 21, 2010.
    Decided: Jan. 4, 2011.
    Mary Penland, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah Brereton Barbier, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, Alan Lance Crick, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mary Penland appeals the district court’s text order denying her pro se motion to vacate a plea agreement, which the district court further construed as a challenge to a forfeiture order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Penland, No. 7:05-cr-00710-HFF-1 (D.S.C. July 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.