Case ID: ny-st-rep_20/html/0149-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Lott, S.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Estate of Susan A. Brooks, Dec’d.
    
      (Surrogate’s Court, Kings County,
    
    
      Filed February, 1888.)
    Collateral inheritance tax—Laws 1887, chapter 713, not retroactive.
    Laws of 1887, chapter 713, amending Laws 1885, chapter 483 (collateral inheritance tax) is not retroactive.
    Assessment of collateral inheritance tax. The facts are found in the opinion.
    
      James W. Ridgeway, for accounting treasurer; Rufus M. Williams, for executor.
   Lott, S.

The deceased died in January, 1886, and therefore the act, chapter 483 of the Laws of 1885, and not the act chapter 718, Laws of 1887, applies to the taxation of her estate. In my opinion the latter act was not intended to be retroactive.

There is no question but that under the act' of 1885, the tax was due immediately after the death of the testatrix (see secs. 2 and 4). The share of the children of the deceased brother of the testatrix is subject to the inheritance tax. To hold that they took through their father would be to defeat their claim to any portion of the estate. Their father having died before the testatrix, the legacy to him would have lapsed. Van Beuren v. Dash, 30 N. Y., 393. Therefore, they must claim directly from the testatrix.