Case ID: sw3d_576/html/0337-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ricky Pittman SMITH, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    ED 106512
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    Filed: June 11, 2019
    Kristina S. Olsen, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
    Eric Schmitt, Nathan J. Aquino, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
    Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Ricky Pittman Smith, III appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).