Case ID: ad3d_19/html/0958-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Nicholas De Matteis, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
    [797 NYS2d 642]
   Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating facility package procedures and the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting smuggling after an unauthorized powdered dietary supplement, along with the directions for its use, were discovered disguised as Kool-Aid in a package sent to petitioner by his cousin. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the misbehavior report and the letter from his cousin outlining the directions for the use of the supplement, combined with his admission at the hearing that he had spoken to his cousin about the supplement and had requested the directions for its use, provide substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt (see Matter of Sartori v Selsky, 297 AD2d 839, 839-840 [2002]; Matter of Nunez v Selsky, 276 AD2d 962, 962 [2000]). Petitioner’s assertion that he requested the directions but not the supplement raised a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Herrera-Martinez v Selsky, 294 AD2d 633, 634 [2002]; Matter of Nunez v Selsky, supra at 962). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including the claim that the Hearing Officer was biased, have been considered and are rejected.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.