Case ID: misc_10/html/0776-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Fitzsimons, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CITY COURT OF NEW YORK
    GENERAL TERM,
    OCTOBER, 1894.
    Frederick Sackett, Respondent, v. Jacob Lippman et al., Appellants.
    Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiff.
    
      Gcmtor da Van Sehaioh, for respondent.
    
      Einste'm da Townsend, for appellants.
   Fitzsimons, J.

The testimony not only is sufficient to" sustain the verdict, but in our judgment preponderates in plaintiff’s favor.

The judgment is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

Newburger, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.