Case ID: f-appx_71/html/0758-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patricia RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-50550. D.C. No. CR-02-00740-TJW.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 17, 2003.
    
    Decided Aug. 13, 2003.
    Before KLEINFELD and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges, and POGUE, Judge.
    
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
    
      
       Honorable Donald C. Pogue, United States Court of International Trade Judge, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Appellant Patricia Rodriguez challenges the district court’s denial of her motion to dismiss the indictment against her, arguing that the grand jury instructions improperly limited the scope of the grand jury’s inquiry in violation of the Fifth Amendment. Appellant’s claim is foreclosed by this Court’s decision in United States v. Marcucci, 299 F.3d 1156, 1159-60 (9th Cir.2002), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 1600, 155 L.Ed.2d 334 (2003). See also United States v. Cedano-Arellano, 332 F.3d 568, 573 (9th Cir.2003). We therefore affirm the district court’s denial of the motion.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.