Case ID: ny-st-rep_62/html/0873-10.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Brooklyn City Court — General Term.
    Filed June 25, 1894.
    Walter S. Davies, Resp’t, v Frederick W. Kalbfleisch, App’lt.
    
      Edward V. B. Kissam, for app’lt; W. Bapelyea Davies, for resp’t.
   Per Curiam.

The exceptions at pages 12 and 18 were taken in general language. Counsel, if he claimed that there could be no recovery for use and occupation under the pleadings, should have specifically stated the ground of his objection. Niebuhr v. Schreyer, 135 N. Y. 614; 48 St. Rep. 73. Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.