Case ID: nj-eq_101/html/0291-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Blum Building Company, appellant, v. Charles H. Ingersoll et al., respondents.
    [Decided May 16th, 1927.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, whose opinion is reported in 99 N. J. Eq. 568.
    
    
      Mr. Milton M. Unger, for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. Howe & Davis, for the respondents.
   Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.