Case ID: f-appx_705/html/0616-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Catherine HILL, individually and as heir of Dillon M. Hill and as special administrator of the Estate of Dillon M. Hill, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 16-16260
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted October 17, 2017  San Francisco, California
    Filed December 5, 2017
    Samuel B. Benham, Esquire, Attorney, Steven M. Burris, Attorney, Law Offices of Steven M. Burris, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellant
    Craig R. Anderson, Esquire, Director, Kathleen A. Wilde, Esquire, Attorney, Marquis & Aurbach, LeAnn Sanders, Trial Attorney, Shirley Blazich, Michael McLoughlin, Alverson, Taylor, Mortensen & Sanders, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellee
    Before: WALLACE, CALLAHAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Catherine Hill appeals from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department in this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Nevada state law. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C, § 1291, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

AFFIRMED 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.