Case ID: ad_158/html/0913-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The Engineer Company, Respondent, v. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Company, Appellant.
    Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 18th day of February, 1913, on a verdict and from an order entered on the 30th day of February, 1913, denying a motion for new trial.
   Per Curiam:

This court on the former appeal (154 App. Div. 123) held that there was a question for the jury. The case now having been submitted to the jury, who have found a verdict for the plaintiff which is supported by the evidence, the judgment is, therefore, affirmed. The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. _