Case ID: so2d_534/html/0902-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WIGGINTON, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Russell SNELLING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 87-2080.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Dec. 8, 1988.
    Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and Carl S. McGinnes, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Bradford L. Thomas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
   WIGGINTON, Judge.

We affirm. State v. Pentaude, 500 So.2d 526 (Fla.1987). Although a majority of the reasons for departure were erroneous, we are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the trial court would have departed on the basis of Pentaude and the egregious nature of the underlying reasons for appellant’s violation of probation. Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985).

JOANOS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.