Case ID: sw2d_941/html/0764-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Daniel KENNEMORE, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. 70235.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    March 18, 1997.
    Steven D. Miller, St. Louis, Brian E. Zink, St. Charles, for Defendant/Appellant.
    Tim Braun, Prosecuting Attorney, Tanya Muhm Williams, Asst. Pros. Atty., St. Charles County, St. Charles, for Plaintiff/Respondent.
    Before CRANE, P.J., and GERALD M. SMITH and PUDLOWSKI, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Kennemore challenges the sufficiency of the state’s evidence and a possible conflict of his defense attorney in his appeal of a class A misdemeanor in the third degree conviction. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).