Case ID: f_296/html/0466-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ARMSTRONG et al. v. DE FOREST RADIO TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    January 7, 1924.)
    No. 130.
    Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
    Suit by Edwin H. Armstrong and the Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company against the De Forest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Company. From an orddr declaring defendant in contempt, and imposing pecuniary penalties for the benefit of plaintiffs, it appeals.
    Appeal dismissed.
    Darby & Darby, of New York City (Samuel E. Darby, Jr., and A*. Leo Everett, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
    Charles Neave and Stephen H. Philbin, both of New York City, for appellees.
    Beforé ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Our opinion filed to-day in the case of Perfection Cooler Co. v. Rotax Co., Inc., 296 Fed. 464, completely covers this matter, and requires that the appeal be dismissed without costs.