Case ID: sw3d_16/html/0744-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

A & J.G., INC., Appellant, v. Harry EGGLESTON, Eagle Eye Care Inc., and Cosmetic Laser Center of Creve Coeur, L.L.C., Respondents.
    No. ED 76712.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    May 2, 2000.
    Michael B. Stern, Clayton, for appellant.
    Gregory P. White, Clayton, for respondent.
    Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A & JG Inc. appeals the trial court’s judgment denying it relief on its breach of contract claim against Harry Eggleston, et al. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carrón, 5B6 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(1).