Case ID: sw3d_381/html/0402-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mark A. STARKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 97739.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Oct. 16, 2012.
    Maleaner Harvey, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Dora A. Fiehter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Starks (Movant) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).