Case ID: nys_127/html/1129-12.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LOCKHART, Respondent, v. HAMLIN, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    February 1, 1911.)
    Action by Cassius A. Lockhart against William Hamlin.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

McLennan, P. J., and WILLIAMS, J., dissent, upon the ground that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover upon quantum meruit under the allegations in his complaint. See 190 N. Y. 132, 82 N. E. 1094.