Case ID: f-appx_265/html/0568-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ibis ZAMUDIO-GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ibis Zamudio-Gomez, Defendant-Appellant.
    Nos. 07-30052, 07-30053.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 14, 2008 .
    Filed Jan. 24, 2008.
    James E. Seykora, Esq., USBI—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    
      Leo Sanford Selvey, Selvey Law Firm, Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: HALL, O’SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Ibis Zamudio-Gomez appeals from the 138-month sentence imposed following his conviction on twelve counts, all in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and 21 U.S.C. § 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Zamudio-Gomez contends that the district court’s denial of a three- or four-level downward adjustment for his role in the offense was clearly erroneous. We disagree and conclude that the district court did not clearly err in declining to apply more than a two-level downward adjustment. See United States v. Davis, 36 F.3d 1424, 1436-37 (9th Cir.1994); see also U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, cmt. n. 3-4.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.