Case ID: nw2d_759/html/0891-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "/s/Eric J. Magnuson Chief Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Garrett M. MARSHALL, Employee, v. STEINBRECHER PAINTING, INC., and Meadowbrook Claims Services, Relators, and Minnesota Department of Labor & Industry, Workers’ Compensation Division, Respondent.
    No. A08-1673.
    Supreme Court of Minnesota.
    Jan. 28, 2009.
    T. Michael Kilbury, Peterson, Logren & Kilbury, P.A., St. Paul, MN, for relators.
    Lori Swanson, Atty. Gen., Rory H. Foley, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, MN, for respondent.
   ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 26, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Eric J. Magnuson Chief Justice