Case ID: ad3d_12/html/0447-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Mohammed Karimzada, Petitioner, v Justices of Supreme Court, State of New York, Queens County, et al., Respondents.
    [783 NYS2d 855]
   Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition and mandamus, inter alia, to prohibit the trial in the action entitled People v Karimzada pending the Supreme Court, Queens County, under indictment No. 807/03, and to dismiss the indictment as time-barred.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]; see Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]). Similarly, the extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]).

The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Adams and Lifson, JJ., concur.