Case ID: ad2d_271/html/0465-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Solivette Vasquez, Appellant.
    [706 NYS2d 879]
   —Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Reinaldo E. Rivera, J.), rendered May 13, 1998, convicting her of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court properly seated a white prospective juror against whom defense counsel and counsel for the codefendant had jointly exercised a peremptory challenge. Counsel for the defendant originally stated that he did not object to the juror, and only offered a race-neutral explanation for the challenge after counsel for the codefendant admitted that he had no basis for his challenge other than a “gut feeling”. Accordingly, the court properly rejected the later, race-neutral explanation (see, People v Kern, 75 NY2d 638, 657-658; People v Jupiter, 210 AD2d 431).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Delgado, 80 NY2d 780, 781-782; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Joy, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.