Case ID: so2d_541/html/0798-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George SEYMORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 88-0716.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    April 26, 1989.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Susan D. Cline; Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carol Cobourn, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction but remand for resentencing. The state concedes that the sentencing guidelines scoresheet was incorrectly scored so to reflect one of appellant’s previous convictions at a score twelve points higher than mandated. The error resulted in appellant being placed in a higher sentencing category. Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing with a corrected scoresheet.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GARRETT, JJ., concur.