Case ID: cust-ct_1/html/0470-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dallinger, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 39773.
    Protest 955382-G of Ferdinand Bing & Co.’s Successors (New York).
   Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel atomizers, boxes, inkstands, menu holders, gueridons vases, and photo frames chiefly used on the table, in the household, or hollow ware were held dutiable at 40’ percent under paragraph 339 as claimed. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 47857), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.