Case ID: f-appx_79/html/0580-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Vincent Depaul MEDLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. P.A. TERRANGI, Warden; Maxine Porcher, T.C. Director; S. Chris Jones, Assistant Programs, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 03-6683.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted June 18, 2003.
    Decided Oct. 29, 2003.
    Vincent DePaul Medley, Appellant Pro Se.
    
      Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Vincent DePaul Medley appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Medley v. Terrangi, No. CA-03-224-2 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 17, 2003 & entered Apr. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.