Case ID: sw2d_958/html/0597-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jeffrey R. HIMMELMANN, Appellant.
    No. 72659.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Jan. 6, 1998.
    Ryals & Softer, P.C., Daniel T. Dalton & Michael J. Beckermann, Clayton, for appellant.
    Tim Braun, Pros. Atty., Tanya Muhm, Asst. Pros. Atty., St. Charles, for respondent.
    Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals sentences for driving while intoxicated, failure to stop for stop sign and two charges of failure to obey traffic control device entered after a jury trial. The trial court did not err and abuse its discretion in allowing cross-examination of defendant on prior convictions on state charges in addition to a prior driving while intoxicated conviction. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The sentences are affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).