Case ID: so2d_354/html/0974-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Francisco CHURRUCA et al., Appellants, v. MIAMI JAI-ALAI, INC., et al., Appellees.
    No. 75-838.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Feb. 8, 1978.
    Heller & Kaplan, Miami, for appellants.
    Frates, Floyd, Pearson, Stewart, Proenza & Richman and Ira H. Leesfield, William R. Dawes, Miami, Subin, Shams, Rosenbluth & Moran, Orlando, Joseph M. Murasko, Fern Park, J. Riley Davis, Tallahassee, Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appellees.
    Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and HEN-DRY and NATHAN, JJ.
   ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on September 14, 1976 (338 So.2d 228) affirming the order of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida in the above styled cause, and

WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed November 17, 1977, 353 So.2d 547 and mandate now lodged in this court quashed a portion of this court’s judgment,

NOW, THEREFORE, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court issued in this cause on November 2, 1976 is withdrawn, the opinion and judgment of this court filed September 14, 1976 insofar as it is in conflict with or fails to conform to the views expressed in the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida aforesaid is withdrawn and vacated, and the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of' this court, and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the Circuit Court (Rulé 3.16(b), Florida Appellate Rules).