Case ID: so2d_345/html/0050-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "TATE, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Arthur H. FLEMING v. John J. ROMERO.
    No. 59609.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    May 6, 1977.
   In re: Arthur H. Fleming applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, 342 So.2d 881, Third Circuit Parish of Iberia.

Application denied; the result is correct.

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS, J., are of the opinion that a writ should be granted.

TATE, J.,

dissents from the denial of the

writ: I am of the opinion that the defendant’s agreement to sell was timely accepted in writing by the plaintiff’s attorney (as well as the defendant’s acceptance of a deposit), for the reasons stated by the trial court.