Case ID: colo_37/html/0422-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 5976.]
    In the Matter of the Application of Henry L. Doherty for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
    Former Opinion Followed.
    This proceeding dismissed in accordance with the opinion in In re Stidger, ante, p. 407.
    
      Original Proceeding.
    
    Application by Henry L. Doherty for a writ of habeas corpus. Writ denied.
    Decision en banc.
    
    
      Dismissed.
    
    Mr. Justice Goddard and Mr. Justice Bailey dissenting.
    Mr. J. F. Vaile, Mr. W. V. Elliott and Mi\ E. J. Bardwell, for petitioners.
   Per Curiam.

For reasons assigned in No. 5887, “In the Matter of the Application of George Stidger for a Writ of Habeas Corpus,” lianded down this date, this proceeding will he dismissed.

Decision en banc. Dismissed.

Mr. Justice Goddard and Mr. Justice Bailey dissent. _