Case ID: so3d_137/html/1124-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

N.W., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D13-1877.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 26, 2014.
    Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael W. Mervine, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before WELLS, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See I.R. v. State, 385 So.2d 686, 687-88 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (“Where the evidence is in conflict, it is within the province of the trier of fact to assess the credibility of witnesses, and upon evaluating the testimony, rely upon the testimony found by it to be worthy of belief and reject such testimony found by it to be untrue.... The testimony of a single witness, even if uncorroborated and contradicted by other State witnesses, is sufficient to sustain a conviction.”).