Case ID: sw2d_907/html/0804-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David Bruce LLOYD, Appellant.
    Nos. WD 49170, WD 50373.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Oct. 17, 1995.
    Emmett D. Queener, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
    Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.
    Before SPINDEN, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SMART, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Lloyd appeals his conviction for the manufacture and production of a controlled substance and denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. Finding no jurisprudential purpose in publishing a written opinion, we issue this summary order. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).