Case ID: ohio-st-3d_92/html/0210-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Cook, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Steinbach et al., Appellants, v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellee.
    [Cite as Steinbach v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 210.]
    (No. 00-1224
    Submitted May 16, 2001
    Decided July 5, 2001.)
    
      Swedlow, Butler, Levine, Lewis & Dye Co., L.P.A., Jeffrey M. Lewis and Brett Lieberman, for appellants.
    
      Gallagher, Gams, Pryor, Tallan & Littrell, L.L.P., and James R. Gallagher, for appellee.
   The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur in judgment.

Cook, J.,

concurring in judgment. I concur in judgment based on the reasoning set forth in my dissenting opinion in Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and in my opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part in Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., concur in the foregoing opinion.