Case ID: ohio-st-3d_73/html/0719-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n     Douglas, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richland County Bar Association v. Gibson.
    [Cite as Richland Cty. Bar Assn. v. Gibson (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 719.]
    (No. 95-821
    Submitted July 26, 1995
    Decided October 11, 1995.)
    
      
      William T. McIntyre, for relator.
    
      Mark H. Aultman, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings of misconduct. However, we find respondent’s misconduct in the administration of this decedent’s estate deserving of a more severe sanction than the board recommended. Moreover, we agree with relator that three years is too long for this estate to wait for restitution from respondent, who apparently possesses assets from which he could satisfy the judgment against him. Therefore, we order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of two years; however, we suspend imposition of the second year of this suspension period on the condition respondent make full restitution, including interest assessed at the legal rate, in accordance with the probate court’s June 10, 1994 settlement order by the end of the first year. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Wright, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent.

Douglas, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent. I would order the sanction recommended by this court’s Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. Because the majority does not do so, I dissent.

Resnick, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.