Case ID: f-appx_697/html/0786-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maurice Antwaun MCKNIGHT, a/k/a Weezie, a/k/a Wee, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 17-6899
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: September 26, 2017
    Decided: September 28, 2017
    Maurice Antwaun Mcknight, FCI Edge-field, Edgefield, SC, pro se
    Arthur Bradley Parham, Esq., Office of the United States Attorney, Florence, SC, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, SC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Antwaun McKnight seeks to appeal the district court’s order disposing of the Government’s post-judgment motion. We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s order and, thus, dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED