Case ID: f-appx_177/html/0870-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michelle TINSLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-15995
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    D.C. Docket No. 04-00110-CR-WS.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    April 17, 2006.
    Kristen Gartman Rogers, Carlos Alfredo Williams, K. Lyn Hillman, Federal Public Defender, Mobile, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Elmond T. Rolison, Jr., Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Before ANDERSON, BIRCH and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Michelle Tinsley in this appeal from a revocation of probation, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Tinsley’s probation and resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.