Case ID: pa_605/html/0407-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

990 A.2d 724
    WALNUT STREET ASSOCIATES, INC., Petitioner v. BROKERAGE CONCEPTS, INC. and Kimberly Macrone, Respondents.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    March 12, 2010.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of March 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Did the Superior Court err in adopting and applying Restatement (Second) of Torts § 772(a), and holding that truthful statements could not form the basis of a claim for tortious interference with contractual relations?

Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.