Case ID: sw3d_250/html/0442-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Otto PLOPPER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 90066.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    April 22, 2008.
    S. Kristina Starke, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Anna L. Bunch, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Otto Plopper appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in finding that the sentence imposed upon Plopper was not unconstitutional. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).