Case ID: f-appx_450/html/0279-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert Lee HOOD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BUNCOMBE COUNTY JAIL; Van Smith, Detective; Mike Downing, Detective; State of North Carolina; Robert W. Fisher, Twenty-eighth Solicitorial District of North Carolina, Asheville, NC, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 11-6710.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 13, 2011.
    Decided: Oct. 17, 2011.
    
      Robert Lee Hood, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis William Euler, Buncombe County Attorney’s Office, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Lee Hood appeals the district court’s order dismissing Hood’s motion to reconsider the denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hood v. Buncombe County Jail, No. 1:91-ev-00078-RJC, 2011 WL 1883825 (W.D.N.C. May 17, 2011). Hood’s motion for appointment of appellate counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.