Case ID: sw3d_273/html/0583-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Gary BORDEN, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 90667.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Jan. 20, 2009.
    James Martin, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Christine Coleman, Clayton, MO, for Respondent.
    Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARYK. HOFF, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gary Borden appeals his conviction after a bench trial on a charge of illegal possession of wildlife (§ 252.040 RSMo, 3 CSR 10-4.136). We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No prece-dential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).