Case ID: f2d_118/html/1014-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Helen A. SCHAEFER et al., Appellees.
    No. 9771.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    April 2, 1941.
    Wm. Fleet Palmer, U. S. Atty., and Irl D. Brett, Sp. Atty., Lands Division, Department of Justice, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
    Walter I. Lyon, of Los Angeles, Cal., fori appellees Tanner and others.
    Ray H. Fitzgerrell and Lyle W. Rucker, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee McKinney and others.
    Robert W. Daniels, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Paugh.
    Roy Raymond Colby, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Reimiller.
    O’Melveny, Tuller & Myers, and John R. A. Girling, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Baker.
    Will H. Winston, of Long Beach, Cal., for appellee Edgar.
    John L. Schaefer, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Schaefer.
    Before DENMAN, MATHEWS, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

On stipulation of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered appeal herein as to parcels 3, 16, 18, 26, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 39-A dismissed; and on stipulation judgment of District Court amended as to parcels 3, 32 and 33; that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, *and mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.