Case ID: sw3d_330/html/0867-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Yvatni BROWN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 93606.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Feb. 1, 2011.
    Jo Ann Rotermund, Office of State Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Chris Foster, Attorney General, Mary H. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Yvatni Brown (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment (judgment) denying her Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. We affirm the motion court’s judgment. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).