Case ID: or-app_80/html/0587-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted June 9,
    affirmed August 6, 1986
    In the Matter of the Conservatorship of Jean Weinstein, a protected person. ORANS, Appellant, v. WILLIS, Respondent.
    
    (7815 and/or 7915; CA A35365)
    722 P2d 744
    Scott W. McGraw, Corvallis, argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs was Guy B. Rencher II, Corvallis.
    J. Britton Conroy, Corvallis, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.
    Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Young, Judge.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

This appeal arises out of an attempt by a grandson, aided and abetted by his mother, to have the grandmother’s conservator removed. He lost in the trial court and has appealed. The matter is before us on de novo review. On the basis of that review, we determine that the case and the appeal are without any discernible merit whatsoever and should not, in good conscience, have ever been initiated, let alone appealed.

Affirmed.