Case ID: f-appx_75/html/0613-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Khadijah JACOB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO SECURITY GUARD SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 02-17482.
    D.C. No. CV-00-01855-MMC.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 8, 2003.
    
    Decided Sept. 15, 2003.
    Khadijah Jacob, pro se, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Linda Claxton, Esq., Louis C. Klein, Esq., Lewis Fisher Henderson & Claxton, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendanb-Appellant.
    Before PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Khadijah Jacob appeals pro se the district court’s judgment, after two jury trials, in favor of Wells Fargo Security Guard Services in her action alleging sex and age discrimination in violation of Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We dismiss the appeal.

We grant Jacob’s motion to supplement the record, but we are unable to review her apparent contentions that defense counsel introduced perjured, prejudicial and undisclosed evidence during trial and that the district court interfered with plaintiffs ability to conduct cross-examination because Jacob has failed to provide a trial transcript. See Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(2); Syncom Capital Corp. v. Wade, 924 F.2d 167, 169 (9th Cir.1991) (per curiam) (holding that court may dismiss appeal or refuse to consider appellant’s contentions when appellant fails to supply a trial transcript).

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.