Case ID: so2d_673/html/0189-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lynell CARR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 95-2904.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 15, 1996.
    Norman W. Edwards, Miami, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Joni Braunstein, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The points raised by the defendant attacking his conviction lack merit. However, as the State properly concedes, pursuant to Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994), the trial court improperly sentenced the defendant to a consecutive habitual offender sentence. Accordingly, the defendant’s conviction is affirmed, but his sentence is reversed and this cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing.

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part, and remanded for resentencing.