Case ID: so3d_245/html/1006-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HEMPSTEAD MARINE, INC., Appellant, v. R AND I SHIPPING LINE, LLC, etc., Appellee.
    Nos. 3D17-1161 & 3D17-1155
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed May 30, 2018
    Boldt Law Firm and Mario R. Giommoni, Ryan C. Tyler, Cody L. Frank and Kimberly L. Boldt (Boca Raton); Hoffman & Hoffman and John D. Hoffman, Miami, for appellant.
    Xander Law Group, P.A., and Wayne R. Atkins, Miami, for appellee.
    Before SUAREZ, SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See St. Joe Corp. v. McIver, 875 So.2d 375, 381 (Fla. 2004) ("Generally, where the parties acknowledge creation of a contract and the disagreement concerns their varying understandings about certain terms, such questions are properly submitted to a jury."); Pan American Bancshares, Inc. v. Trask, 278 So.2d 313, 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973) (when parties to an oral contract dispute their "understanding as to certain terms," the question is "properly submitted to the jury.").