Case ID: f-appx_320/html/0552-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shanadoa Wayne JOHNSON, aka Shaun Wayne Wise, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-30292.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 18, 2009.
    
    Filed March 24, 2009.
    Michael S. Lahr, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Helena, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    John Rhodes, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Defenders of Montana, Missoula, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Shanadoa Wayne Johnson appeals from the six-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for false representation of a social security number, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(7)(B). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Johnson contends that the district court imposed a proeedurally and substantively unreasonable sentence by disregarding the parsimony clause of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). He contends that the district court compounded this error by ordering that he serve the sentence consecutive to his state sentence. We conclude that the district court did not proeedurally err, and that the sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.