Case ID: f-appx_42/html/0617-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Timothy LAYTON, Petitioner.
    No. 02-6987.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted July 19, 2002.
    Decided Aug. 1, 2002.
    Timothy Layton, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

Timothy Layton has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, asking this Court to direct the district court to rule on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2002) petition based on undue delay. Although we find that mandamus relief is not warranted because the delay is not unreasonable, we deny Layton’s petition for a writ of mandamus without prejudice to his ability to file a new petition for mandamus relief if the district court does not act expeditiously. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mandamus before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.