Case ID: so2d_613/html/0145-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Curtis PRINCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-0213.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Feb. 17, 1993.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Debra Moses Stephens, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carol Cobourn Asbury, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions but agree with appellant and the state that the trial court erred in imposing consecutive mandatory minimum sentences under the circumstances of this case. See Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992). Accordingly, we remand with directions that the sentences be made concurrent.

ANSTEAD and WARNER, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.