Case ID: wash_39/html/0702-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(No. 5675.
    Decided May 15, 1905.)
    The State of Washington, Respondent, v. N. A. Harris, Appellant.
      
    
    Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Neal, J., entered September 7, 1904, upon a trial and conviction of the offense of practicing dentistry without a license.
    Affirmed.
    
      John R. Parker and E. J. Brown, for appellant.
    
      Kenneth Mackintosh and Samuel R. Stern, for respondent.
    
      
       Reported in 80 Pac. 1135.
    
   Pee Curiam.

Appellant was prosecuted upon an information charging him with the crime of practicing dentistry without a license, in that he did treat a disease and lesion of the human teeth, and did correct a malposition of the human teeth and jaws, of one W. H. Beebe, in violation of the provisions of the dental laws of chapter 152, Laws of 1901. From a judgment of conviction, he appeals to this court.

The only question raised upon this appeal is the validity of the said dental law. The constitutionality of this law has been sustained by this court in State ex rel. Smith v. Board of Dental Examiners, 31 Pac. 492, 72 Pac. 110; In Re Thompson, 36 Wash. 377, 78 Pac. 899, and many subsequent cases. In consideration of these many decisions, this court is constrained to refuse to enter again upon the consideration of the question presented.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.