Case ID: so2d_766/html/0346-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. SHEVIN, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Willie B. STANLEY, Appellant, v. FIRST STATE BANK and Fernando Fonseca, Appellees.
    No. 3D99-2263.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 5, 2000.
    Donald S. Rose, Miami, for appellant.
    
      Shapiro & Fishman and Susan Minor, Deerfield Beach; Mark S. Sussman, North Miami Beach, for appellees.
    Before GODERICH, SHEVIN and SORONDO, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ., concur.

SHEVIN, J.,

specially concurring.

I am required to concur in this court’s affirmance because, as the Second District found in Sulkowski v. Sulkowski, 561 So.2d 416, 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), “[failure to acquaint oneself with the requirements of a judicial sale cannot constitute an adequate cause to set aside the sale.” I write especially because I find that the procedure in the clerk’s office of accepting plaintiffs’ attorneys trust account checks, but declining defendants’ attorneys trust account checks, is inequitable. This practice should be reconsidered.