Case ID: sw3d_525/html/0214-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Angela P. BOONE, Respondent, v. PITTSBURGH PIPE & SUPPLY CORPORATION, Appellant, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
    No. ED 105325
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    FILED: August 22, 2017
    
      ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Charles S. Kramer, Paul Adams Grote, Co-Counsel, 7700 Bonhomme Ave., 7th Floor, St. Louis, MO 63105, RIEZMAN & BERGER, P.C.
    ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Ryan Scott Shaughnessy, 1140 Boulder Creek Parkway, Suite 202, O’Fallon, IL 62269, SHAUGHNESSY LAW FIRM, P.C.
    Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Pittsburgh Pipe & Supply Corporation (“Employer") appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”), which found that Angela Boone was not disqualified from unemployment benefits after her termination from Employer because of misconduct connected with work. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The evidence in support of the Commission’s order was not insufficient. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Commission’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).