Case ID: so2d_944/html/0341-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Christopher MORRISON, Petitioner, v. Eleonora Bianca ROOS, Respondent.
    No. SC05-2170.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Nov. 30, 2006.
    Elizabeth K. Russo and Jonathan L. Gaines of Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., Miami, FL, and J. Stephen O’Hara, Jr. of O’Hara Spradley, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, for Petitioner.
    Thomas E. Duffy, Jr. of Terrell, Hogan, Ellis and Yegelwel, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision in Roos v. Morrison, 913 So.2d 59 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), based on a question certified by the First District Court of Appeal to be of great public importance. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction of this cause. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.