Case ID: pa-super_208/html/0721-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

May 27, 1966
    Commonwealth v. Michelotti.
    Argued April 14, 1966.
    
      Marjorie Hanson Mat-son, for appellant j Edwin J. Martin, Assistant District Attorney, with him Robert W. Duggan, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
   Per Curiam:

Judgment of sentence affirmed and

the defendant is directed to appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence, or any part of it which had not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas. Hoeeman, J., would grant a new trial, because the lower court failed to charge the jury that the testimony of an accomplice, who had been indicted for the same crime as the defendant, should be received with great caution.

Watkins, J., absent.