Case ID: cust-ct_47/html/0340-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Ford, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 66147.
    Hartford Spinning, Inc. v. United States,
    protests 276917-K, 280009-K, and 282156-K (Ogdensburg).
   Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waste composed of synthetic materials, not eo nomine specified in the tariff act, and following the principles set forth in United States v. Steinbeg Bros. (47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.