Case ID: nj-eq_68/html/0799-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles H. Olden, appellant, v. Uriah Sassman, respondent.
    [Argued March 30th, 1905.
    Decided November 20th, 1905.]
    On appeal from a decree of the. court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Reed, whose opinion is reported in 67 N. J. Eq. 239.
    
    
      Mr. Fergus A. Dennis and Mr. John T. Bird, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Edwin Robert Walker, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth iir the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Reed.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray—13.

For reversal—None.