Case ID: ny-st-rep_60/html/0444-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Sedgwick, Ch. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George Lewis Prentiss, as General Guardian, etc., Resp’t, v. Ellen Bowden, App’lt.
    
      (New York Superior Court, General Term,
    
    
      Filed May, 1894.)
    
    Time—Computation.
    Courts take notice of the fractions of a day when there are conflicting rights, for the determination of which it is necessary for them to do so.
    Appeal by defendant from judgment entered upon the decision of a judge at special term.
    
      Benjamin Pattepson and George Bell, for app’lt; William B. Wilder, for resp’t.
   Sedgwick, Ch. J.

The action was in the nature of a creditor’s bill, designed to reach real property that had been conveyed by the debtor to the defendant. The plaintiff, in order to succeed in the action, had to prove that an execution had been issued against the debtor’s property and had been returned unsatisfied. Adsit v. Butler, 87 N. Y. 585. An execution had been issued and returned, but it was void. It had been levied on the day of the debtor’s death, and about five hours after his death. Section 1879 of the Code of Civil Procedure forbids that being" done. Wallace v. Swinton, 64 N. Y. 188.

The counsel for respondent invokes the principle by which, in certain cases, courts do not take notice of the fractions óf a day. They do, however, take notice of them when therfe are conflicting rights, for the determination of which it is necessary for them to do so. Broom’s Leg. Max. 134. First and last, the fact that the judgment debtor had died would be decisive that an execution could not issue.

For this reason the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Freedmah and Mo Adam, JJ., concur.