Case ID: f-appx_692/html/0204-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Raul CESARIO-MENDO, Defendant-Appellant
    No. 16-40761 Summary Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Filed July 5, 2017
    Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Raul Cesario-Mendo, Pro Se
    Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Raul Cesario-Mendo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cesario-Mendo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. In light of the nonreversible error in describing the offense as a marijuana offense, the judgment of the district court is REFORMED to show that Cesar-io-Mendo was convicted and sentenced for possession of five kilograms or more of cocaine with intent to distribute. See, e.g., United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 369 (5th Cir. 2009). 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47,5.4.