Case ID: okla_164/html/0139-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DURHAM et al. v. BROWN et al.
    No. 22267.
    Opinion Filed June 20, 1933.
    
      . Armstrong & Murphy and Sam Gill, for plaintiffs in error.
    A. M. Beets, D. T. McConnell, Adelbert Brown, and Lewis R. Morris, Co. Atty., for defendants in error.
   PER CURIAM.

On April 7, 1931, plaintiff . in error filed case-made with petition in error in this court, and on November 3, 1981, the brief was filed by plaintiff in error.

The defendants in error have failed to file any brief or offer any excuse for such failure. The case is, therefore, reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate and set aside the order and judgment heretofore rendered and render judgment for the plaintiff in accordance with the prayer of the petition in error. City of Oklahoma City v. Blondin, 163 Okla. 276, 21 P. (2d) 1063.