Case ID: so2d_152/html/0471-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. DREW, Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sarah LEDFORD, Petitioner, v. SEARS ROEBUCK & CO., Lally Adjustment Bureau and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
    No. 32475.
    Supreme Court of Florida,
    April 24, 1963.
    John P. Grier, Miami, for petitioner.
    Lally, Miller & Hodges and H. Jack Miller, Miami, for Sears Roebuck & Co.
    Burnis T. Coleman and Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on Petition for Writ of Certiorari upon the transcript of record and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, to review the order of the Florida Industrial Commission in said cause, bearing date December 28, 1962, and the Petitioner having failed to show that the essential requirements of law have been violated, it is ordered that said Petition be and the same is hereby denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

DREW, J., concurs specially.

DREW, Justice

(concurring specially).

I concur in the denial of certiorari in this case solely because of Petitioner’s failure to complain, either here or before the full commission, of the palpable insufficiency of Deputy Halpert’s compensation order based on a record containing 180 pages of involved evidence. The questioned order contains nothing but the Deputy’s ultimate findings and judgment.