Case ID: so2d_511/html/1130-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary Welsh DeHARRIET, Dierdre DeHarriet, Patricia DeHarriet, Michaela DeHarriet, Appellants, v. Enrique PINEDO and Marcelo V. Fagalde, Appellees.
    No. 87-0285.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Sept. 9, 1987.
    Roger C. Lambert of Barnett & Alagia, Palm Beach, for appellants.
    James C. Pilkey of Taylor, Brion, Buker & Greene, Miami, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

Based on what was brought before this court, reversal is insupportable. As was said in Zimmerman v. Vinylgrain Industries of Jacksonville, Inc., 464 So.2d 1353, 1354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), echoing North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber, 143 So.2d 849, 853 (Fla.1962), “[i]f there is any reasonable doubt in the matter of vacating a default, it should be resolved in favor of granting the application and allowing the trial upon the merits.” Accordingly, we affirm.

HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.