Case ID: conn_110/html/0698-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edna V. Cavanaugh vs. The Connecticut Company.
    Third Judicial District, Bridgeport,
    October Term, 1929.
    Wheeler, C. J., Maltbie, Haines, Hinman and Banks, Js.
    Argued October 31st, 1929
    decided March 3d, 1930.
    
      Israel J. Cohn, for the appellant (plaintiff).
    
      Seth W. Baldwin, for the appellee (defendant).
   Per Curiam.

We cannot hold upon the evidence under the rule announced in Rosenthal v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 88 Conn. 65, 89 Atl. 888, as amplified, explained and followed in Belledeau v. Connecticut Co., ante, p. 625, 149 Atl. 127, that the trial court erred in setting-aside the verdict.’

'There is no error.