Case ID: ohio-st-3d_50/html/0156-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cincinnati Bar Association v. Grote.
    [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Grote (1990), 50 Ohio St. 3d 156.]
    (No. 89-2164
    Submitted February 21, 1990
    Decided April 18, 1990.)
    
      
      Carolyn A. Taggart and Joseph L. Trauth, Jr., for relator.
    
      James N. Perry, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We agree that respondent violated DR. 1-102(A)(4) and 6-101(A)(3). However, we find respondent’s misconduct deserving of a more severe sanction than that recommended by the board. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.