Case ID: sw2d_901/html/0352-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tron HALL, Appellant.
    No. 66344.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    June 30, 1995.
    Raymund J. Capelvotieh, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and CRAHAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment following his conviction by a jury of unlawful use of a weapon in violation of § 571.030.1(1) RSMo 1994. Defendant was sentenced to four years imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detañed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth our reasoning. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).