Case ID: or-app_109/html/0481-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Submitted on record and appellant’s brief August 27,
    reversed and remanded for new trial October 30, 1991
    GEORGE MICHAEL UMTUCH, Appellant, v. BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent.
    
    (90-C12069, 90-C-12069; CA A67210 (Control), A67370)
    818 P2d 1300
    Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Stephen J. Bedor, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.
    Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem, waived appearance for respondent.
    Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Deits, Judge.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

In this habeas corpus action, the trial court, on its own motion after the writ was issued, dismissed it before defendant had filed a return. The state has conceded by a letter waiving its appearance that that was error. Bird v. Maass, 104 Or App 271, 800 P2d 792 (1990). We accept the concession.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial. 
      
       There are 2 appellate case numbers, because 2 notices of appeal were filed by different counsel.