Case ID: so2d_543/html/0428-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DAUKSCH, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Samuel CHANDLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 88-2009.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    May 18, 1989.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Kenneth Witts, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
    Samuel Chandler, Starke, pro se.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dee R. Ball, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
   DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction in a drug case. Appellant’s attorney filed an Anders brief and appellant then filed a pro se brief. Neither brief brings up anything to warrant reversal but the pro se brief does raise a competency of counsel issue which must first be directed to the trial judge under Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

AFFIRMED.

COWART and GOSHORN, JJ., concur. 
      
      . Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).