Case ID: so2d_819/html/0233-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GEORGE’S CRANE SERVICE, INC., and Craven, Thompson & Associates, Inc., Appellants, v. SIGNAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellee.
    No. 4D01-3043.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    June 5, 2002.
    Rosemary B. Wilder of Marlow, Connell, Valerius, Abrams, Adler & Newman, Miami, for appellants.
    Angela C. Flowers, Kubicki Draper, Miami, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order granting appellee’s renewed motion for directed verdict and entering final judgment. We agree with the trial court that the indemnification agreement did not meet the requirements of section 725.06(2), Florida Statutes (1999), since it did not give a “specific consideration” for the indemnification that was “provided for” in the contract.

SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ„ concur.