Case ID: ad3d_23/html/0359-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Herbert Oelschlagel, Plaintiff, v United Parcel Service et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. Burton L. Sekuler, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, et al., Third-Party Defendant.
    [804 NYS2d 765]
   In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the third-party plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated June 1, 2004, which granted the motion of the third-party defendant Burton L. Sekuler for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint insofar as asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

“Although physicians owe a general duty of care to their patients, that duty may be limited to those medical functions undertaken by the physician and relied on by the patient” (Boone v North Shore Univ. Hosp. at Forest Hills, 12 AD3d 338, 339 [2004];see Wasserman v Staten Is. Radiological Assoc., 2 AD3d 713, 714 [2003]). The third-party defendant Burton L. Sekuler submitted evidence sufficient to establish his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851 [1985]; Kleinert v Begum, 144 AD2d 645 [1988]). The single examination by Sekuler of the plaintiffs decedent did not render him responsible for her care subsequent to his consultation. In opposition, the third-party plaintiffs failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact. S. Miller, J.P., Krausman, Rivera and Covello, JJ., concur.