Case ID: ny-st-rep_70/html/0891-12.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Clara Parisette, App’lt, v. Louis Parisette, Resp’t.
    N. Y. Sup. Ct.,
    October 24, 1895.
    
      John D. Townsend, for app’lt; Frederick O. Steffen, for resp’t.
   Per Curiam.

The denial of the motion herein by the judge at special term was based upon conclusions of fact fully supported by the affidavits. The motion was properly denied. The order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.