Case ID: nys_8/html/0959-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

King, Appellant, v. Liebeskind, Respondent.
    
      (Superior Court of New York City, General Term.
    
    February 14, 1890.)
    Appeal from special term.
    Action by Bennett J. King against Abraham Liebeskind.
    Argued before Sedgwick, C. J., and Truax and Dugro, JJ.
    
      Charles H. Smith, for appellant. Franklin Bien, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The pleadings are not before us, and for that reason there' is nothing to show that the judge at special term erred in denying plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the demurrer as frivolous, and for the relief demanded in the complaint. Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.