Case ID: wash_144/html/0332-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 20670.
    Department Two.
    July 19, 1927.]
    The State of Washington, on the Relation of State Highway Committee, Plaintiff, v. Roland H. Hartley et al., Respondents. 
    
    
       Mandamus (89) — To State Boards — Scope of Inquiry — Moot' Question. Mandamus will not lie to compel state officers to-return unopened bids to the state highway committee, where the right to possession has become a moot question, through the necessity of readvertising for new bids.
    
       Same (41) — To State Officers — Public Records — Possession. Mandamus lies to compel the state highway engineer to turn over records to the state highway committee, whose property they were.
    Application filed in the supreme court May 7, 1927, for a writ of mandamus to compel the governor and state highway engineer to deliver records and bids for highway work to the state highway committee.
    Denied in part and granted in part.
    
      The Attorney General and L. B. Donley, for relator.
    
      Coleman & Fogarty and E. H. Guie, for respondents.
    
      
      Reported in 258 Pac. 6.
    
   Per Curiam:.

In this action it is sought to have the respondents return to the state highway committee certain unopened bids for highway work and certain records of the committee.

£1] It appears from the record that the case, in so far as it involves the unopened bids, is a moot one, for these bids were some of those submitted in response to advertisement for the letting of contracts for highway work, and the majority of the bids having been returned to those who presented them, the possession by the committee of the remaining unopened bids is a matter of no moment for the reason that the work must of necessity be readvertised and new bids called for before the contracts can be let.

£2] On the other branch of the ease, involving the records of the state highway committee, the respondent Humes, who it is alleged is in possession of these records, should turn such records over to the possession of the committee, they being the property of, and rightfully in the possession of, the committee.

Therefore the writ is denied as to the respondent Hartley and is granted as to the respondent Humes, who is directed to deliver to the state highway committee all books and records belonging to that committee.