Case ID: ne2d_753/html/1282-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Pamela Gayle WILSON.
    No. 98S00-0104-DI-218.
    Supreme Court of Indiana.
    Aug. 16, 2001.
   ORDER OF SUSPENSION FOR FAILURE TO COOPERATE WITH THE DISCIPLINARY PROCESS

Comes now the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and, pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 23(10)(f), moves this Court for the respondent's suspension from the practice of law in this state, alleging therein that the respondent has failed to respond to the Commission's demands for responses, made pursuant to Admis.Disc.R. 23(10)(a), to grievances filed against the respondent. Pursuant to that motion, on June 11, 2001, this Court issued an order directing the respondent to show cause in writing why she should not be suspended from the practice of law in this state due to her failure to cooperate with the disciplinary process. The respondent failed to respond to that order.

This Court, being duly advised, now finds that the respondent should be suspended from the practice of law in this state due to her failure to cooperate with the disciplinary process.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that, pursuant to Admis.Disc.R. 23(10)(f), the respondent, Pamela Gayle Wilson, is suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, until (1) the executive secretary of the Disciplinary Commission certifies to this Court that the respondent has cooperated with its investigation of a grievance filed against her; (2) the investigation or any related disciplinary proceeding that may arise from the investigation is disposed; or (8) further order of this Court.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to send notice of this Order by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the respondent and her attorney. The Clerk is further directed to send notice of this Order to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and to all other entities pursuant to Admis.Disc.R. 23(3)(d), governing suspension.

All Justices concur.