Case ID: sw3d_423/html/0800-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mark FRISELLA, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 99041.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Oct. 15, 2013.
    Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Gregory L. Barnes, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Mark Frisella, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).