Case ID: ga_169/html/0869-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Hines, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Prisant et al. v. Feingold.
    No. 7362.
    February 11, 1930.
    
      Poltle & Hofmayer, for plaintiffs..
    
      Leonard Farkas, for defendant.
   Hines, J.

Under tlie rulings in Prisant v. Peingold, ante, 864, the court did not err in refusing to attacli the respondent for contempt.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.