Case ID: f-appx_42/html/0609-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Guy Lancaster RICHMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of MARYLAND; Correctional Medical Service, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees, and Federal Court of Appeals; Maryland Correctional Medical Department, Defendants.
    No. 02-6433.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted July 25, 2002.
    Decided Aug. 1, 2002.
    Guy Lancaster Richmond, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Stanley Street, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, Kramon & Graham, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Guy Richmond appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2002) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Richmond v. Maryland, No. CA-01-3683-WMN (D.Md. Feb. 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.