Case ID: cma_18/html/0578-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Darden, Judge: Ferguson, Judge", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES, Appellee v ANTHONY A. ROMERO, Lance Corporal, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant
    18 USCMA 578, 40 CMR 290
    No. 22,073
    September 19, 1969
    
      Lieutenant Allen D. Black, JAGC, USNR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.
    
      Lieutenant Charles J. Keever, USMC, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.
   Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

The accused pleaded guilty and was found guilty of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 921. The providence of his plea is now under attack.

The procedure followed by the president of this special court-martial would not meet the standard that must apply to cases tried thirty days after the decision in United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247. His inquiry, however, is comparable to that found in Care. The president determined that defense counsel had explained each element of the offense charged to the accused but nowhere did he itemize for the accused each element. Considering the inquiry made and the crime charged, we are satisfied that Romero’s plea is knowing and provident.

The decision of the board of review is, therefore, affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Ferguson, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent.

For the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247, I would reverse the decision of the board of review and order a rehearing.