Case ID: ohio-st-3d_94/html/1475-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS
    01-2282.
    McDonald v. Dayton.
   Montgomery App. No. 18721. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and cross-appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of this court that appellee/crossappellant has not filed a memorandum in response and in support of cross-appeal, due January 30, 2002, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute the cross-appeal with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the cross-appeal be, and hereby is dismissed, sua sponte.

The appeal of the city of Dayton et al. remains pending.