Case ID: ga-app_28/html/0728-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodwobth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

13542.
    Odom v. The State.
    Decided July 11, 1922.
    Indictment for possessing liquor; from Muscogee superior court —-Judge Munro. March 25, 1922.
    
      D. L. Parmer, R. Terry, for plaintiff in error.
    
      C. F. McLaughlin, solicitor-general, contra.
   Bloodwobth, J.

No error of law is complained of. The evidence is contradictory; the jury, the final arbiters on all questions of fact, believed the witnesses for the State, as they had a right to do, and returned a verdict of guilty, and this court cannot overturn such a verdict when approved by the judge who presided at the trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.