Case ID: wis-2d_73/html/0206-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Punches, Respondent, v. Schmidt, and another, Appellants.
    
      No. 645 (1974).
    
    
      Argued February 2, 1976.
    
      Decided June 30, 1976.
    
    (Also reported in 243 N. W. 2d 518.)
    For the appellants there were briefs by Bronson G. La Follette, attorney general, Charles R. Larsen and James H. McDermott, assistant attorneys general, and oral argument by Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney general.
    For the respondent there was a brief by Boar, Drill, Norman & Balcke of New Richmond, and oral argument by Thomas D. Bell.
    
   Per Curiam.

The members of the court being equally divided on the question of whether the judgment and order should be affirmed or reversed, Mr. Chief Justice Beilfuss, Mr. Justice Hanley, and Mr. Justice Robert W. Hansen being of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed, and Mr. Justice HEFFERNAN, Mr. Justice Connor T. Hansen, and Mr. Justice Day being of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, the judgment appealed from is affirmed under the rule.

Judgment affirmed.