Case ID: njl_115/html/0560-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. THOMAS SERLINSKY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued May 27, 1935
    Decided October 9, 1935.
    
      For the plaintiff in error, Joseph Grossman and Merritt Lane.
    
    For the defendant in error, James D. Carpenter.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodi'ne in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.