Case ID: f-appx_10/html/0131-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Keith S. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Daniel Brown, an infant, who brings this action by his next friend, Plaintiff, v. Natalie RAMSEY; Ruby Hart, Defendants-Appellees, and Karen Davis; Joseph Ramsey; Juanita Joyce; Mary Jane Leckrone; Billy K. Cannaday, Jr.; Stephanie Moats; Arliss Ketchum; Gail Heath; James M. Haggard, Defendants.
    No. 01-1041.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted May 8, 2001.
    Decided May 21, 2001.
    Keith S. Brown, pro se. Timothy Meade Richardson, Huff, Poole & Mahoney, P.C., Virginia Beach, VA, for appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Keith S. Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 & 1986 (West 1994) complaints. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v. Ramsey, No. CA-98-75 (E.D.Va. Nov. 24, 2000). We deny Appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.