Case ID: ohio-law-abs_27/html/0543-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "By THE COURT", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE ex YEAZELL v GARVIN
    Ohio Appeals, 2nd Dist, Clark Co
    No 354.
    Decided June 1, 1938
    Aaron J. Halloran, Springfield, for relator.
    H. W. Snodgrass, Asst. City Solicitor, Springfield, for respondent.
   OPINION

By THE COURT

The above entitled cause presents the identical questions as are presented in case Nc. 353, and the motion to dismiss the appeal will be sustained on the ground that the action is one in mandamus and not appealable. We make reference to case No. 353 for full opinion.

BARNES, PJ, HORNBECK and GEIGER, JJ, concur.