Case ID: f-appx_87/html/0323-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Clinton R. BEDELL, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. VT. D.O.C.; John Gorczyk; J. Labriola; Dr. Curry-El, Psychologist; Dr. General; Dr. Fielding; B. Blakely; E. Williams; F. Roach; C. Mitchell; C. Davis; M. Millard; M. Boone; K. Davis, Defendants—Appellees, and Ron Angelone, F.T.C.A. Official Capacity; Interstate Compact Contract; Greensville; Va. D.O.C.; K. Clark; Terry Mosher, (VtDoc); Shauna Lewis; Dr. Lewis; R. Spence; G. Garraghty, Defendants.
    No. 03-7682.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 19, 2003.
    Decided Feb. 11, 2004.
    Clinton R Bedell, Jr., Appellant pro se.
    Philip Carlton Hollowell, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia; John David McChesney, Rawls & McNelis, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Michael Eugene Ornoff, Ornoff & Arnold, P.C., Virginia Beach, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM.

Clinton R. Bedell, Jr., appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his complaint against various defendants, including prison authorities in Virginia and Vermont. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and orders disposing of Bedell’s claims and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bedell v. Vermont Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-01-780-2 (E.D.Va. Oct. 6, 2003). We deny Bedell’s motion for leave to file a supplemental brief and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED