Case ID: sw3d_538/html/0345-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jerry L. RADLEY, Appellant.
    WD 80077
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    ORDER FILED: December 19, 2017 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 30, 2018
    Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.
    Jerry Radley, Cameron, MO, Appellant, pro se.
    Before Division One: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, and James Edward Welsh and Karen King Mitchell, Judges
    Order
   Per Curiam:

Jerry Radley appeals from the denial of his "Motion Requesting Sua Spont[e] Inquiry into Abandonment by Postconviction Counsel," which also alleged that "Counsel Labored Under a Conflict of Interest." Radley argues that the court erred in denying his motion on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction. Because the court did not clearly err in denying Radley's motion, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).