Case ID: f_119/html/0544-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WALEACE, Circuit Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NEW YORK PHONOGRAPH CO. v. NATIONAL PHONOGRAPH CO.
    (Circuit Court, S. D. New York.
    November 13, 1902.)
    No. 7,719.
    1. Parties—Right to Maintain Suit—Effect of Champertous Contract.
    Tbe right of a complainant to maintain a suit is not affected by a contract constituting a third person its agent to prosecute and collect all claims against defendant for a per cent, of the amount recovered, even though such contract may have been champertous.
    In Equity. On plea.
    Eouis Hicks, for complainant.
    Howard W. Hays, for defendant.
   WALEACE, Circuit Judge.

The complainant’s right to maintain this action is in no respect affected by its contract with Andem. By this contract Andem was made its agent to prosecute all its claims and demands against the defendant and various other parties, and collect all moneys arising therefrom, and to retain as his compensation a sum equal to 6o per cent, of recoveries; and complainant undertook not to settle or compromise without his consent, and he undertook not to settle or compromise with the defendant for less than a specified sum without the consent of the complainant. Andem could not have maintained an action in his own name against the defendant.

As to the contention that the agreement was champertous, even if the law of champerty were in force in this state and if the agreement were void, the complainant would not be precluded from maintaining an action not founded upon the agreement.

The plea is overruled, with costs.