Case ID: ohio-law-abs_1/html/0375-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SULLIVAN, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 368
    WORTHINGTON, BELLOWS & CO. v. WHITMAN
    Ohio Court of Appeals,
    Nov. 25, 1921
    15 Ohio App. 161
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS — Defense—Consid- . eration a gambling transaction — Stock margins— 5966 GC. — Proviso—Broker of stock exchange— Evidence of intent to gamble.
    Attorneys — Wilkin, Cross & Daoust, for plaintiff in error; John A. Elden, Contra.
   SULLIVAN, J.

Error to Cuyahoga Common Pleas; judgment reversed.