Case ID: njl_73/html/0678-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SARAH DILKS, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. ORLANDO KELSEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued November 27, 1905
    Decided June 18, 1906.
    On error to the- Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiff in error, Timothy J. Middleton and John J. Crandall.
    
    For the defendant in error, Watkins & Avis.
    
   Per Cueiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court, affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court, in proceedings under the Landlord and Tenant act, is now affirmed on the grounds stated in the per curiam memorandum filed in the Supreme Court, and reported in 59 Atl. Rep. 897.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Greeij, Gray. 10.

For reversal. — None.