Case ID: so3d_92/html/0311-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edward W. MASLOW, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE o/b/o Julianne M. EDWARDS, Appellee.
    No. 5D11-3034.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    July 20, 2012.
    Rehearing Denied Aug. 7, 2012.
    Edward W. Maslow, Little Falls, NY, pro se.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and William H. Branch, Assistant Attorney General, Child Support Enforcement Division, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Edward Maslow appeals the trial court’s order recalculating his child support obligation and arrearages. In doing so, he misperceives the effect of our remand in Maslow v. Edwards, 59 So.3d 299 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). There, we concluded that the trial court had failed to apply the correct formula in determining Maslow’s child support obligation, but affirmed as to all other issues raised by Maslow. On remand, the trial court complied with our mandate in recalculating child support. Contrary to Maslow’s argument, he was not entitled to a new trial.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, C.J., TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.