Case ID: f-appx_624/html/0130-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David SERVIN-TERRASAS, a/k/a David Servin, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-7169.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 15, 2015.
    Decided: Dec. 18, 2015.
    David Servin-Terrasas, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before GREGORY and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Servin-Terrasas appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012), and denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304-05 (4th Cir.2013) (reviewing the disposition of a § 3582(c)(2) motion for an abuse of discretion); United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.2010) (holding that the district court does not have authority to reconsider a prior order for a § 3582(c)(2) motion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of relief. United States v. Servin-Terrasas, No. 4:06-cr-00004-JLK-1 (WD.Va. Mar. 23 and May 5, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Servin-Terrasas’ motion to reconsider was also a motion for downward departure.