Case ID: so3d_225/html/1053-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "GENOVESE, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Louisiana v. Marvin JOHNSON
    NO. 2016-OK-1520
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    09/06/2017
   ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT, PARISH OF ASSUMPTION

Writ denied.

GENOVESE, J.,

would grant and assigns reasons:

h Defendant was tried and convicted by a six-person jury for a felony punishable at hard labor. The Louisiana Constitution states: “A case in which the punishment is necessarily confinement at hard labor shall be tried before a jury of twelve persons, ten of whom must concur to render a verdict.” La.Const. art. 1, § 17(A). Additionally, this constitutional mandate is codified in La.Code Crim.P. art. 782(A) which states: “Cases in which punishment is necessarily confinement at hard labor shall be tried by a jury composed of twelve jurors, ten of whom must concur to render a verdict.”

Thus, it is crystal clear that a felony punishable at hard labor shall be tried by a twelve-person jury, not a six-person jury. The word “shall” is mandatory. This error is structural. A constitutional and legislative mandate cannot be sluffed off as harmless error. I would grant this writ to correct the structural error.