Case ID: f2d_926/html/1573-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Oliver M. BOND and Herta R. Bond, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OCTAGON PROCESS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 90-8898.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    March 28, 1991.
    E. Freeman Leverett, Heard, Leverett, Adams and Phelps, P.C., Elberton, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants.
    
      Carl R. Woodward, III, Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfillan, Cecehi & Stewart, Roseland, N.J. and Peter J. Anderson, Peterson, Dillard, Young Self & Asselin, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellee.
    Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, DUBINA, Circuit Judge, and HENDERSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of the district court’s dispositive opinion, which is reported as Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc., 745 F.Supp. 710 (M.D.Ga.1990).

AFFIRMED.