Case ID: ohio-st-3d_71/html/0097-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      \n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cochrane.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Cochrane (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 97.]
    (No. 94-1763
    Submitted October 24, 1994
    Decided December 7, 1994.)
    
      Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Harald F. Craig III, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
   Per Curiam.

Respondent has failed to show cause why he should not receive discipline comparable to that imposed by the Supreme Court of Nevada. Accordingly, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.