Case ID: so2d_935/html/1230-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael Allen DRIGGERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 5D05-3554.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Aug. 11, 2006.
    James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Rebecca M. Becker, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
    Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ann M. Phillips, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.
   PER CURIAM.

See § 812.022(2), Fla. Stat. (2001) (providing that “[pjroof of possession of property recently stolen, unless satisfactorily explained, gives rise to an inference that the person in possession of the property knew or should have known that the property had been stolen”).

AFFIRMED.

PLEUS, C.J., ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.