Case ID: f2d_142/html/1014-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. CLUETT, PEABODY & CO., Inc., a Corporation, and Menlo Investment Company, a Corporation, Appellees.
    No. 10543.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    May 25, 1944.
    Norman M. Littell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Vernon L. Wilkinson and Wilma C. Martin, Attys., Department of Justice, both of Washington, D. C., and M. Mitchell Bourquin, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., for appellant.
    Edgar H. Rowe and Walter S. Brann, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee Cluett, Peabody & Co.
    Andrew F. Burke, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee Menlo Investment Co.
    Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the stipulation of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the judgment of the said District Court in this cause be modified pursuant to the stipulation filed, that a judgment be filed and entered herein pursuant to said stipulation and that the mandate of this Court in this cause issue forthwith.