Case ID: njl_64/html/0722-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RICHARD R. MILLER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. PETER GREENWALT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued March 14, 1900
    Decided June 18, 1900.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiff in error, John W. Wescott and John J. Crandall.
    
    For the defendant in error, Edward G. C. Bleakly.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment brought up by this writ of error must be affirmed, for the reasons given by Mr. Justice Collins in his opinion in the Supreme Court. See ante p. 197.

For affirmance—Depue (Chief Justice), Van Syckel, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees. 10.

For reversal—Magie (Chancellor). 1.