Case ID: njl_101/html/0569-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOHN TRICOLO, RESPONDENT, v. DONATO CENTALANZA, APPELLANT.
    Argued March 20, 1925
    Decided May 18, 1925.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 2 N. J. Mis. B. 1157.
    For the appellant, Thomas Brunetto.
    
    For the respondent, Gaetano M. Belfatto.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.