Case ID: nev_92/html/0748-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOHN D’ATRI and LIVIA D’ATRI, Appellants, v. ROBERT VIGNALATS, Respondent.
    No. 8938
    December 30, 1976
    557 P.2d 272
    [Rehearing denied January 27, 1977]
    
      Ralph M. Crow, Carson City, for Appellants.
    
      A. J. Bayer, Jr., Carson City, for Respondent.
   OPINION

Per Curiam:

Although appellants contend the district court erred in granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment, they have faded to demonstrate error, as contemplated by our rules, through briefs citing pertinent portions of the record and relevant authority. Accordingly, we will not consider their contentions. Holland Livestock v. B & C Enterprises, 92 Nev. 473, 553 P.2d 950 (1976).

Affirmed.