Case ID: ark_294/html/0208-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Raenita McKIMM v. STATE of Arkansas
    742 S.W.2d 114
    Supreme Court of Arkansas
    Opinion delivered January 13, 1988
    
      D. Scott Hickam, for petitioner.
    No objection.
   Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Raenita McKimm, by and through her attorneys, Hickam & Williams, P.A., has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Her attorney, D. Scott Hickam, admits that the record was submitted late due to his miscalculation of the seven-month maximum limit for filing the record in this Court. See Ark. R. App. P. 5.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.