Case ID: mont_53/html/0250-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MR. JUSTICE SANNER", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re PEPIN’S ESTATE. PEPIN, Appellant, v. MEYER et al., Respondents.
    (No. 3,911.)
    (Submitted January 24, 1917.
    Decided February 9, 1917.)
    [160 Pac. 107.]
    (For syllabus, see In re Pepin’s Estate, ante, p. 240.)
    
      Appeal from District Court, Hill County; John W. Tattan, Judge.
    
    In the Matter of the estate of Simon Pepin, deceased. Petition of Adolph A. Pepin against Elizabeth Meyer and others for revocation of probate of will was dismissed, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      Mr. Wellington D. Pankin, for Appellant.
    
      Messrs. Norris & Hurd, Mr. L. Y. Beaulieu and Mr. A. L. Lamey, for Respondents.
   MR. JUSTICE SANNER

delivered the opinion of the court.

This appeal is from an order precisely similar in character, based upon the same kind of record and presenting identical questions as that disposed of in In re Pepin’s Estate (Exor Pepin v. Elizabeth Meyer), ante, p. 240, 163 Pac. 104, just decided. Upon the authority of that decision the order here appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Brantly and Mr. Justice Holloway concur.