Case ID: ohio-st-3d_52/html/0220-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Reinstatler.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Reinstatler (1990), 52 Ohio St. 3d 220.]
    (No. 89-2217
    Submitted April 4, 1990
    Decided July 11, 1990.)
    
      
      J. Warren Bettis, disciplinary counsel, and Mark H. Aultman, for relator.
    
      Thomas R. Reinstatler, pro se.
    
   Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record in this case, we agree with the board’s findings of misconduct. However, we find that an indefinite suspension from the practice of law should be imposed in response to respondent’s violations of the Disciplinary Rules. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.