Case ID: njl_117/html/0454-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PATRICK DOUGHERTY, RESPONDENT, v. ANTHONY P. MILLER, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT.
    Argued October 20, 1936
    Decided January 22, 1937.
    For the respondent, H. Albert Hyett.
    
    For the appellant, Bolte & Miller.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.