Case ID: so2d_477/html/1032-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      DAUKSCH, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles E. ARD, Appellant, v. Morton D. AULLS, et al., Appellees.
    Nos. 84-1008, 84-1709.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Oct. 3, 1985.
    Rehearing Denied Nov. 4, 1985.
    Larry Sands, P.A., Daytona Beach, for appellant.
    Clifford L. Adams of Rumberger, Kirk, Caldwell, Cabaniss & Burke, P.A., Orlando, for appellee Aulls.
    F. Bradley Hassell of Smalbein, Eubank, Johnson, Rosier & Bussey, P.A., Daytona Beach, for appellees C. Michael Duncan and Lawyers Professional Liability Ins. Corp.
   DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary final judgment in a legal malpractice case. Ap-pellees failed to file a lis pendens against real property which was the subject of a lawsuit in which appellees were the lawyers for appellant. Had they filed the lis pendens perhaps a quiet title judgment would not have been rendered against appellant. It is alleged the lawyers were negligent. That is a question for the jury to decide — was there a legal duty (to properly represent Ard) which they breached (by not recording the lis pendens) which caused (was the alleged breach the cause) injury (was there an injury) to Ard? Jury questions are not decided by summary judgment.

The judgment is reversed and this cause remanded for trial.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

UPCHURCH and SHARP, JJ., concur.