Case ID: so2d_98/html/0744-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. ROBERTS, Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frederick G. PENCE, Appellant, v. Nancy PENCE, Appellee.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Dec. 4, 1957.
    J. Lewis Hall, Tallahassee, for appellant.
    S. L. Holland, Jr., Bartow, Richard L. Walsh, Washington, D. C., and Cromelin, Raysor, Fletcher, Walsh & Lauderdale, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., and THOMAS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

HOBSON, ROBERTS and DREW, JJ., dissent.

ROBERTS, Justice

(dissenting).

I would reverse with directions to enter a decree of divorce. It is obvious to me that the marriage is done for. See language in McGee v. McGee, 149 Fla. 31, 5 So.2d 49. This states my views about such situations as we have here.

DREW, J., concurs.