Case ID: so2d_421/html/0021-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas BARTOLOMEO and Mamie Bartolomeo, Appellants, v. Juan ALVAREZ and Concepcion Alvarez, his wife, Appellees.
    No. 81-2569.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 12, 1982.
    Rehearing Denied Nov. 16, 1982.
    Brumer, Cohen, Logan & Kandell, Goodwin, Ryskamp, Welcher & Carrier and Kenneth L. Ryskamp, Miami, for appellants.
    Manuel A. Crespo, Miami, for appellees.
    Before HENDRY, SCHWARTZ and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The record supports the conclusion that the vendors waived the right to rely upon the “time is of the essence” provision of their real estate contract with the appellees. The judgment granting specific performance is therefore affirmed on the authority of Forbes v. Babel, 70 So.2d 371 (Fla.1953). See also, Harrison v. Baker, 402 So.2d 1270 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Affirmed.