Case ID: sw2d_966/html/0312-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rodney VAN HUSKEY, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 71724.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    March 10, 1998.
    
      Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 7, 1998.
    David C. Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for movant-appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Gregory L. Barnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., and SIMON and HOFF, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rodney Van Huskey, Movant, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after a hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and concluded the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). A published opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b)(2). We have provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only. Judgment affirmed.