Case ID: ark_24/html/0586-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Compton:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Wilson vs. The State.
    The ease of Matthews vs. State, ante, approved.
    
      Appeal from, Ouachita Circuit Gourb.
    
    Hon. JohN T. Bearden, Circuit Judge.
    Gallagher & Newton, for appellant.
    JORDAN, Attorney General, relied upon the cases of Brittmi vs. State, 5 Eng., 301, and Matthews vs. State, decided at December term, 1866.
   Mr. Justice Compton:

The only question presented in this case, is precisely the same as that determined in Matthews vs. State, at the last term. The decision in that case is the law of this. Let the judgment be affirmed.