Case ID: cust-ct_13/html/0340-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Laweence, Judge:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Raffaele D’Amora et al. v. United States
    No. 6035.
    Invoices dated Naples, Italy, August 29, 1936, etc.
    Certified August 29, 1936, etc.
    Entered at Boston, Mass., September 21, 1936, etc.
    Entry No. 3816, etc.
    (Decided June 22, 1944)
    
      Joseph F. Lockett for the plaintiff.
    
      Paul P. Rao, Assistant Attorney General (Daniel I. Auster, special attorney) r for the defendant.
   Laweence, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement cover certain peeled tomatoes in tins, imported from Italy.

The uncontradicted evidence discloses :

1. That said tomatoes are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Luigi Vitelli Elvea, Inc., et al., Reap. Dec. 5941; that the issues in the two cases are the same; and that the record in the cited case had been incorporated herein.

2. That said tomatoes, at the time of the exportation thereof, were freely offered for sale to all purchasers in Naples (one of the principal markets in Italy) in the usual .wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade packed ready for shipment for exportation to the United States, at the following values, there being no higher foreign values:

Reap. No. Entry Per case of 24 tins of 1,200 grams each Per case of 48 tins of 600 grams each
135147-A 3816. $2. 05 $2. 65
138732-A 4057. 2. 05 2. 65
138736-A 457. 2. 00 2. 60
All the foregoing less 2 per centum cash; less .65 lire loading charge; less cost of cartons (if of American manufacture and if included in each price).

I therefore find the proper basis of value for the involved merchandise to be the export value as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such values are as set forth above.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.