Case ID: a3d_208/html/0461-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DANA HOLDING CORPORATION, Petitioner v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (SMUCK), Respondent
    No. 729 MAL 2018
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    May 14, 2019
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

1. Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in applying the [Protz II] standard to the case on appeal at the time of this Court's decision retroactive to the date of the IRE instead of as of the date of the Supreme Court changed in the law?
2. Whether the Commonwealth Court's failure to grant the employer credit for the three year period between the date of the IRE evaluation and the date of this Court's decision in [Protz II] unlawfully violates Employer's constitutional right pursuant to the "Due Course of Law" provisions of the Pennsylvania Constitution Article I, Section 11?