Case ID: sw2d_886/html/0756-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Laura Ann LACEY, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Michael Robert LACEY, Respondent/Appellant.
    No. 64764.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Nov. 22, 1994.
    Allan H. Zerman, Cary J. Mogerman, Zer-man & Mogerman, L.L.C., Clayton, for appellant.
    Thomas H. Lake, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals from the September 2, 1993 disolution decree of the trial court (as modified on September 17, 1993). We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. A written opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).