Case ID: ohio-st-3d_97/html/1420-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[Cite as 10/30/2002 Case Announcements, 2002-Qhio-5820.]
    CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
    
      October 30, 2002
    
    MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS
    2002-1349.
    Hooten v. Safe Auto Ins. Co.
   Hamilton App. No. C-010576. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ entry dated August 2, 2002:

“Must a trial court, before ruling on a motion for summary judgment under Civ.R. 56, either set an oral or non-oral hearing date or establish a cut-off date for parties to submit affidavits or materials opposing the motion?”

Douglas and P.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

The conflict ease is Hall v. Klien (Sept. 3, 1999), Wood App. No. WD-99-001, 1999 WL 682584.