Case ID: misc2d_35/html/0177-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John Bracchi, Respondent, v. James King & Sons, Inc., Appellant.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    April 26, 1962.
    
      
      John W. Olmstead and John Nielsen for appellant. Winnie & Matis (Robert E. Judge of counsel), for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

In an action in which recovery was based on the failure to supply a safe working space as required by section 200 of the Labor Law, failure to charge that a requisite for defendant’s liability was knowledge, actual or constructive of the condition complained of is ground for reversal. (Zaulich v. Thompkins Sq. Holding Co., 10 A D 2d 492.)

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.

Concur — Hoestadter, J. P., Gold and Capozzoli, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.