Case ID: f-appx_57/html/0203-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos ROME, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-7904.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted March 6, 2008.
    Decided March 14, 2003.
    Carlos Rome, Appellant Pro Se. C.J. Moore, Cherry Point, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Carlos Rome appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for return of property, specifically $6245 in U.S. currency. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Rome, No. CR-00-33-4 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.