Case ID: ga-app_27/html/0285-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Luke, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

12411.
    Davenport v. The State.
    Decided July 12, 1921.
    Description and counsel as in case next before.
   Luke, J.

1. None of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial contains reversible error; they all relate to the charge of the court, and the portions thereof excepted to are correct statements of the law applicable to the facts of the case; and if the defendant desired any fuller or more specific instructions, he should have presented to the court a written request therefor.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and, no error of law appearing, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.