Case ID: sw3d_540/html/0888-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James W. LEWIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    ED 105167
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: March 6, 2018
    Annette M. Wallace, 920 Main Street, Suite 500, Kansas City, MO 64105, For Movant/Appellant.
    Evan J. Buchheim, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.
    Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

James W. Lewis appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Burston v. State, 343 S.W.3d 691, 693 (Mo. App. E.D. 2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b). 
      
      All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2016, unless otherwise indicated.