Case ID: f-appx_285/html/0418-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John A. MERZWEILER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 06-56421.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 1, 2008.
    
    Filed July 10, 2008.
    John A. Merzweiler, Huntington Beach, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Carol A. Chen, Esq., Office of the U-.S. Attorney Civil & Tax Divisions, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

John A. Merzweiler appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendant in Merzweiler’s lawsuit, arising from the termination of his employment with the United Statés Postal Service. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Albano v. Norwest Fin. Haw., Inc., 244 F.3d 1061, 1063 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm.

We agree with the district court that the Office of Special Counsel’s decision finding no jurisdiction was correct for the reasons stated by the district court.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.