Case ID: scl_20/html/0524-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel G. Lavender v. Luoy Lavender, Executrix of D. Lavender.
    This Court will very seldom interfere with the vérdict of a jury — the general rule is, that such a verdict will not be disturbed; but where it is manifest that the verdict is without evidence to sustain it, in the furtherance of justice, a new trial will be granted ; and in such a case the opinion of the judge below, against the verdict, is of great importance as furnishing the best means of knowing that the Verdict is not sustained by the evidence which appeared on the trial, but which cannot bo shewn on paper.
   Per Curiam,

granting motion for new trial.