Case ID: f-appx_624/html/0108-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph CUCINIELLO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles RATLEDGE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 15-7054.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 23, 2015.
    Decided: Dec. 14, 2015.
    Joseph Cuciniello, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Cuciniello, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012)' petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cuciniello v. Ratledge, No. 5:15-hc-02008-FL (E.D.N.C. June 22, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.