Case ID: f-appx_184/html/0323-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Douglas FAUCONIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E.M. SHRINER, C.O. II; Groves, C.O. Lieutenant; Stolmeyer, C.O. Captain; Coulter, C.O. Lieutenant, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 05-7279.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 22, 2006.
    Decided: June 6, 2006.
    Douglas Fauconier, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Douglas Fauconier appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fauconier v. Shriner, No. CA-05-149-RDB (D. Md. filed Aug. 2, 2005; entered Aug. 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.