Case ID: pa_615/html/0423-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

42 A.3d 1057
    COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Craig Mathew HECKMAN, Respondent.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    April 27, 2012.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of April 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED and the Superior Court’s decision is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Wilgus, 6 MAP 2012, and, if deemed necessary by the Superior Court, further briefing to explore the factual distinctions between this case and Wilgus, specifically the ties Defendant Heckman maintained to the residence he originally registered.