Case ID: ga-app_86/html/0832-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Worrill, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

34168.
    Clay v. Merchants Mutual Credit Corporation.
    Decided September 26, 1952.
    
      Barrett & Hayes, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Edward E. Dorsey, Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, contra.
   Worrill, J.

1. Where the defendant excepted to a judgment overruling his general demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition but failed to argue or insist upon that ground of exception before this court, the judgment of the trial court overruling such general demurrers will be affirmed. See Code (Ann.), § 6-1308, and cases cited under catchword “Abandonment.”

2. “An assignment of error on a judgment striking an answer can not be made in a bill of exceptions assigning error on a judgment overruling a general demurrer to a petition. Wright v. Morris, 50 Ga. App. 196 (3) (77 S. E. 365).” Cooledge v. Casey, 58 Ga. App. 134 (2), 137 (198 S. E. 96).

Judgment affirmed.

Sutton, C.J., and Felton, J., concur.