Case ID: sw2d_920/html/0193-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mike NAZEMI, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Leila NORMAND, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. 67393.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    April 23, 1996.
    Gary M. Siegel, David M. Segall, Gerald M. Poger, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Sharon E. Wilkes, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mike Nazemi appeals from a jury verdict in favor of the defendant, Leila Normand, on a claim for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident. We affirm. Respondent’s motion to dismiss and for damages for frivolous appeal is denied.

An extended opinion would serve no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).