Case ID: or-app_229/html/0090-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

On appellant’s petition for reconsideration filed March 19,
    reconsideration allowed; former disposition (217 Or App 429,175 P3d 1028 (2008)) withdrawn; remanded for resentencing June 10, 2009
    STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRIAN SCOTT TRAUTWEIN, Defendant-Respondent.
    
    Benton County Circuit Court
    CM0520181; A129516
    209 P3d 850
    John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Erika L. Hadlock, Acting Solicitor General, and Paul L. Smith, Assistant Attorney-in-Charge, Criminal Appeals, for petition.
    Before Wollheim, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

The state petitions this court to reconsider its decision in State v. Trautwein, 217 Or App 429, 175 P3d 1028 (2008). In Trautwein, a state’s appeal, the state argued that the trial court had erred in ruling that the imposition of consecutive sentences under ORS 137.123(5) would have violated defendant’s right to a jury trial under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We affirmed without opinion. The state now contends that, in light of Oregon v. Ice, 555 US_, 129 S Ct 711, 172 L Ed 2d 517 (2009), our previous decision was incorrect. We agree and, accordingly, withdraw our former decision and remand for resentencing.

Reconsideration allowed; former disposition withdrawn; remanded for resentencing.