Case ID: sw3d_406/html/0080-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Philip A. NIBLOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 75079.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Aug. 13, 2013.
    Susan L. Hogan, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
    Andrew C. Hooper, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before Division Three: LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Presiding Judge, MARK D. PFEIFFER and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judges.
   Order

PER CURIAM.

Philip Niblock appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, after he was convicted of first-degree tampering. Ni-block contends the motion court clearly erred in denying post-conviction relief because his defense counsel was ineffective for failing to call two potential alibi witnesses and failing to fully cross-examine the victim and impeach her testimony. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).