Case ID: sw2d_908/html/0381-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert O. BAILEY, Appellant. Robert O. BAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    Nos. 66514, 68237.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Oct. 31, 1995.
    Emmett D. Queener, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Aundreia R. Alexander, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated action, Defendant appeals from his conviction of second degree burglary and stealing, and from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm.

An extended opinion would serve no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).