Case ID: so2d_764/html/0611-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

McFADDEN FORD, INC., Appellant, v. Diana MANCUSO, Incompetent, By and Through her parents and legal guardians, Mario MANCUSO and Antoinette Mancuso, and Mario Mancuso and Antoinette Mancuso, individually, Appellees.
    No. 98-4152.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Aug. 11, 1999.
    Glen R. Goldsmith and Alan N. Jockers of Glen R. Goldsmith and Associates, P.A., Miami, for appellant.
    Todd R. Falzone of Sheldon J. Schlesinger, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.
   ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND MOTION TO RECALL THE MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Appellees have filed a motion for rehearing and also a motion to treat their rehearing motion as timely and to recall the mandate. We grant the relief requested, recall the mandate issued June 18, 1999, vacate our June 2, 1999 opinion, and direct the appellees to file an answer brief within twenty days from the date of this opinion. Appellant may file a reply brief within twenty days after the filing of the answer brief.

GUNTHER, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.