Case ID: f-appx_465/html/0232-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lynn Ellen MENDES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles BROWN; Charlotte Mecklenburg Public Library, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 11-1710.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 9, 2012.
    Decided: Feb. 13, 2012.
    Lynn Ellen Mendes, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lynn Ellen Mendes appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006), and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mendes v. Brown, No. 3:10-cv-00397-RLV-DCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 19, 2010; Aug. 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.