Case ID: ad2d_146/html/0656-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Smith, Appellant.
   — Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), rendered December 3, 1987, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of his plea allocution has not been preserved for appellate review since he did not seek to withdraw his plea at any time prior to sentencing (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636).

In any event, under the circumstances herein, the court properly adjudicated the defendant in violation of probation based upon his plea of guilty (see, CPL 410.70; People v Lombardo, 108 AD2d 873, 874; People v Pons, 134 AD2d 378).

We find no basis for concluding that the sentence, which was the product of a negotiated plea, requires modification in the interest of justice (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

Finally, we note that contrary to defendant’s contention the material referred to by the People was not dehors the record. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Kunzeman and Hooper, JJ., concur.