Case ID: f-appx_218/html/0226-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In Re: Wenley McCLAREN, Petitioner.
    No. 06-7194.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 17, 2007.
    Decided: Feb. 16, 2007.
    Wenley MeClaren, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Wenley McClaren petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his Motion for Reduction of Sentence. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Because the district court has recently decided McClaren’s motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.