Case ID: so3d_272/html/0540-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Any dismissal not specifically designated \"with prejudice\" is considered to be \"without prejudice.\" See La.C.C.P. art. 1673 ; State ex rel. Dep't of Soc. Serv. v. A.P. , 02-2372 (La. App. 1 Cir. 6/20/03), 858 So.2d 498 (\"[w]hen the judgment is silent as to whether it is being dismissed with or without prejudice, the dismissal must be without prejudice.\")", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eric Dewayne CURTIS v. MICHELS CORPORATION, et al.
    No. 2019-C-603
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    June 3, 2019
    ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT, PARISH OF ALLEN
    Writ denied.
    HUGHES, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.
    Hughes, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.
   Any dismissal not specifically designated "with prejudice" is considered to be "without prejudice." See La.C.C.P. art. 1673 ; State ex rel. Dep't of Soc. Serv. v. A.P. , 02-2372 (La. App. 1 Cir. 6/20/03), 858 So.2d 498 ("[w]hen the judgment is silent as to whether it is being dismissed with or without prejudice, the dismissal must be without prejudice.")