Case ID: njl_110/html/0013-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LOUIS FINKELSTEIN, RESPONDENT, v. HYMAN BRODSKY, APPELLANT.
    Submitted October 28, 1932
    Decided January 5, 1933.
    For the respondent, Lichtenstein, Schwartz & Friedenberg.
    
    For the appellant, Stuhr & Vogt.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Circuit Court Judge Ackerson, to whom the case was referred and whose opinion is printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 55.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Teen-chard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 16.

For reversal — None.