Case ID: so2d_447/html/1074-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Arthur QUICK v. MURPHY OIL COMPANY, et al.
    No. 84-C-0391.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    April 2, 1984.
   In re Murphy Oil Company, M.J. Leumas, Dave Thomas, and James O’Neal, Jr., applying for writ of certiorari or review to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal, No. 13258, from the Twenty-fifth Judicial District Court, Parish , of St. Bernard, No. 38-421.

Case below: 446 So.2d 775.

Writ denied. The result, remanding the case to the district court for further proceedings, is correct. We decline, however, to express an opinion at this stage of the proceeding as to whether the date of “contraction” can be established with sufficient legal certainty to hold that the cause of action arises at that time. Such a determination necessarily requires expert testimony explaining how such time, or period of time, can be established. Until such a record is before the court, the issue cannot be fairly resolved. See Owens v. Martin, 438 So.2d 1114 (La.1984).