Case ID: f-appx_670/html/0804-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Angelo Marcellus IRVING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 16-6705
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: November 17, 2016
    Decided: November 21, 2016
    Angelo Marcellus Irving, Appellant Pro Se. Lauren Catherine Campbell, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAKLER, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Angelo Marcellus Irving appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen the time to appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Irving v. Clarke, No. 3:14-cv-00571-JAG (E.D. Va. Apr. 29,2016), We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED