Case ID: f-appx_681/html/0572-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Randal MAUDERER Plaintiff-Appellant v. IOWA ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, et al. Defendants-Appellees
    No. 16-3866
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 23, 2017
    Filed: March 28, 2017
    Randal Mauderer, Pro Se
    Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Randal Mauderer appeals after the district court dismissed his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, in which he alleged that his recommended participation in a Sex Offender Treatment Program violated his constitutional rights; and that the conditions of his exercise privileges while in segregation violated both his constitutional rights and the Americans with Disabilities Act. We conclude that the action was properly dismissed for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (§ 1915A(b) dismissal is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny the appellate motions. 
      
      . The Honorable Rebecca Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.