Case ID: ad2d_201/html/0301-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bohunka O. Held, Respondent, v Peter Held, Appellant.
    [608 NYS2d 835]
   Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter M. Schackman, J.), entered March 10, 1992, which, inter alia, restored temporary maintenance of $500 a week in favor of plaintiff, sua sponte, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We perceive no abuse of discretion in the reinstatement of the temporary maintenance award, and reiterate that "the proper remedy of a party who thinks that temporary support payments ordered are excessive * * * is to press for an early trial” (Dreyfus v Dreyfus, 72 AD2d 522). We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.