Case ID: sw3d_374/html/0397-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James D. BALDWIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 74009.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Aug. 28, 2012.
    Susan E. Summers, for Appellant.
    Richard A. Starnes, for Respondent.
    Before Division Two: JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Presiding Judge, ALOK AHUJA, Judge and MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant James D. Baldwin appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evi-dentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A formal, published opinion would have no jurisprudential value; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).