Case ID: f-appx_89/html/0063-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Alberto RUEDA-NARANJO, aka Daniel Rueda, Daniel Alberto Naranjo, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-10343.
    D.C. No. CR-02-05452-REC.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted Feb. 17, 2004.
    
    Decided Feb. 23, 2004.
    William L. Sims, USF-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Robert W. Rainwater, Appointed Federal Public Defender, FPDCA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Fresno, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before FERNANDEZ, W. FLETCHER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Daniel Alberto Rueda-Naranjo appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 77-month sentence for being a deported alien found in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Rueda-Naranjo has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Rueda-Naranjo has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.