Case ID: ad2d_115/html/1014-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Robert Pondexter, Respondent, v Harold J. Smith, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, et al.,
   for reargument granted and, upon reargument, judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, and petition dismissed (see, Matter of Semper v Smith, 66 NY2d 130). Moreover, the hearing officer’s designation was proper (Matter of Purnell v Kelly, 115 AD2d 1010), and a review of the record reflects the right of respondent to call witnesses was not denied. Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, O’Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.