Case ID: sw2d_860/html/0392-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joann HAZZARD, Employee-Appellant, v. CHRYSLER MOTOR PLANT II, Employer-Respondent.
    No. 63164.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Aug. 31, 1993.
    Gabriel & McCartney, P.C., James F. McCartney, St. Louis, for employee-appellant.
    Raymond J. Flunker, Jeffrey M. Proske, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, for employer-respondent.
    Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employee, Joann Hazzard, appeals from a decision by the Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) which reduced the worker’s compensation award set by the Administrative Law Judge against her employer-de1 fendant, Chrysler Motor Plant II.

The Commission’s decision is supported by substantial and competent evidence on the whole record; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

The decision of the Industrial Relations Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).