Case ID: f-appx_6/html/0543-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michaelene HART, Appellant, v. ORACLE CORPORATION, Appellee.
    No. 00-1446.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted May 1, 2001.
    Filed May 4, 2001.
    
      Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Michaelene Hart appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment in Hart’s employment discrimination action, and Oracle Corporation moves to dismiss the appeal. We deny Oracle Corporation’s motion to dismiss, and having reviewed the parties’ submissions and the record, see LaCroix v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 240 F.3d 688, 690 (8th Cir.2001) (standard of review), we agree with the district court that Hart failed to show Oracle Corporation’s proffered reason for terminating her was pretextual, see Cronquist v. City of Minneapolis, 237 F.3d 920, 924 (8th Cir.2001) (burden-shifting analysis). We thus affirm the judgment entered by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.