Case ID: njl_112/html/0090-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOSEPH FEMIA, RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF BAYONNE, APPELLANT.
    Argued October 23, 1933
    Decided January 5, 1934.
    Por the respondent, Hyman BrodsTcy.
    
    Por the appellant, Daniel J. Murray.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells^ Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.