Case ID: sw2d_838/html/0522-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cathy L. SCHMIDT, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Michael C. SCHMIDT, Respondent/Appellant.
    No. 60976.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division.
    Oct. 27, 1992.
    Jeffrey P. Hine, Oliver, Oliver, Waltz & Cook, P.C., Cape Girardeau, for respondent, appellant.
    David G. Beeson, Michael L. Jackson, Jackson, for petitioner, respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from decree of dissolution which dissolved a nine-year marriage between the parties.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). •