Case ID: so2d_506/html/0481-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nadean O. McARTHUR, f/k/a Nadean Orr Huff, Appellant, v. Clarence Wright (Pete) HUFF, III, Appellee.
    No. 4-86-2196.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 6, 1987.
    Odette Marie Bendeck of Gunster, Yoak-ley, Criser & Stewart, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Ronald Sales of Law Office of Ronald Sales, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee (withdrawn after briefs filed).
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm in part and reverse in part. We reverse only that portion of the trial court’s order which determined the value of the necklace and direct the court, if the issue has not been mooted by the return of the necklace, to conduct a separate eviden-tiary hearing to determine the value of the necklace.

ANSTEAD and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

STONE, J., dissents without opinion.