Case ID: conn_161/html/0595-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard Clark et al. v. Leo J. Mulcahy et al.
    
      Fíalo G. Gnutti, for the appellants (plaintiffs).
    
      Bernard F. McGovern, Jr., assistant attorney general, for the appellees (defendants).
    Argued October 5
    decided October 5, 1971
   It appearing that the plaintiffs in the above-entitled ease have failed to prosecute their appeal from the Superior Court in Tolland County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed unless the appellants’ brief is field on or before November 15, 1971.