Case ID: f-appx_397/html/0860-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Arnold YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 10-6761.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 30, 2010.
    Decided: Oct. 8, 2010.
    Larry Arnold Young, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
   Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larry Arnold Young appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Young, No. 1:88-cr-00112-1 (S.D.W.Va. May 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.