Case ID: wash_93/html/0699-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 13348.
    Department One.
    November 13, 1916.]
    Clarke & Eaton Company, Appellant, v. Warden Investment Company, Respondent.
    
    Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered October 25, 1915, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action for damages, tried to the court.
    Affirmed.
    
      Peacock & Ludden, for appellant.
    
      Wakefield & Witherspoon (E. P. Twohy, of counsel), for respondent.
    
      
      Reported in 160 Pac. 1199.
    
   Per Curiam.

The question in this case is whether a payment of interest amounting to $1,466.64, made upon a note secured by a real estate mortgage, should be credited upon a note executed by the defendant and held by the plaintiff. The trial court, upon the issues of the case, found that a settlement and stated account was had by the parties, and that the defendant had assumed this payment in addition to the note held by the plaintiff. The evidence plainly sustains this finding. The judgment must therefore be affirmed.