Case ID: nj_48/html/0491-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDWARD “RUFF” FARMER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued January 9, 1967 —
    Decided February 6, 1967.
    
      Mr. Rudolph J. Rossetti, Assistant Camden County Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent, State of New Jersey (Mr. Norman Heine, Camden County Prosecutor, Attorney).
    
      Mr. Edward F. Menneti, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. G. Zachary Seltzer on the brief).
   The opinion of the court was delivered

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the testimony and considered defendant’s grounds and arguments for reversal. We find no basis to reverse the conviction.

Affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Haul, Schettino and Haneman — 7.

For reversal — None.