Case ID: so2d_736/html/0001-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph SPRINGER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 94-2646.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 31, 1995.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Neil Rose, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Sylvie Perez Posner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.
   CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the defendant’s contention, and the state’s appropriate concession, that Springer’s conviction as to the robbery with a firearm charge contained in count three may not be sustained because it is duplicitous of the charges and convictions in counts one and two. See Fraley v. State, 641 So.2d 128 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Nordelo v. State, 603 So.2d 36 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Compare Smart v. State, 652 So.2d 448 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). Accordingly, the conviction as to count three is vacated and the cause remanded for resen-tencing as to counts one and two.