Case ID: ad_158/html/0906-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Arthur A. Rath, Respondent, v. Roy H. McNaught, Appellant, and Another, Defendant.
   As the affidavits for the remedy by arrest made a prima facie case of actionable fraud without reference to the proceedings in the suit of Eastmond v. McNaught (ante, p. 903), the order denying, the motion to vacate the order of arrest is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to abide the event. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.