Case ID: f-appx_292/html/0357-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guillermo RODRIGUEZ-FLORES, also known as Memo, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-10181
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Sept. 12, 2008.
    Susan B. Cowger, Tamara Lynn Reno, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Heather J. Barbieri, Plano, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
    
      ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
    
   PER CURIAM:

This court granted counsel’s motion to withdraw and dismissed the appeal of Guillermo Rodriguez-Flores pursuant to An-ders v. California. The Supreme Court vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Gall v. United States.

We have reconsidered this matter in light of Gall. However, nothing in the Supreme Court’s Gall decision requires us to change our prior opinion in this case. Accordingly, we reinstate the prior opinion. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL is DISMISSED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
     
      
      . 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). United States v. Rodriguez-Flores, 236 Fed.Appx. 138 (2007).
     
      
      . 552 U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).
     
      
      . See U.S. v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 530 F.3d 381, 385-89 (5th Cir.2008).