Case ID: so2d_626/html/1035-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Reuben TROUTMAN, Appellant, v. Valerie Denise TROUTMAN, Appellee.
    No. 93-1113.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 9, 1993.
    Cain & Snihur, and May L. Cain, North Miami Beach, for appellant.
    Estelle G. Furlong, Miami, for appellee.
    Before HUBBART, BASKIN and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

When viewed as a whole, we believe the trial court properly exercised its discretion in reaching a scheme of equitable distribution and support obligations reflecting the contribution of both parties to the marriage. Pastore v. Pastore, 497 So.2d 635, 636-37 (Fla.1986); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). Therefore, we affirm the final judgment entered below.

Affirmed.