Case ID: nj-eq_88/html/0595-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary Agnes Heyer, complainant-respondent, v. Michael A. Sullivan, defendant-appellant.
    [Decided March 14th, 1918.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery, advised by Vice-Chancellor Baches, whose opinion is reported ante p. 165.
    
    
      Mr. Theodore Rurode, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Thomas J. Brogan, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We agree with the vice-chancellor that the gift was not established. We express no opinion on the other points discussed by him. Let the decree be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner — 12.

For reversal — None.