Case ID: ill-app_182/html/0387-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Clark", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. W. Goggin, Defendant in Error, v. Western Union Telegraph Company, Plaintiff in Error.
    Gen. No. 18,385.
    (Not to be reported in full.)
    Abstract of the Decision.
    Municipal Court op Chicago, § 28
      
      —when propositions of law are necessary. Under section 61 of the Practice Act, J. & A. fl 8598, as to tendering propositons of law to be passed upon, which section has been adopted by the rules of the Municipal Court, such propositions are necessary to save questions for review.
    Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John R. New-comes, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1912.
    Affirmed.
    Opinion filed October 14, 1913.
    Statement of the Case.
    Action by J. W. Goggin against Western Union Telegraph Company for damages dne to a mistake in transmitting a telegram. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error. .
    West & Eckhart, for plaintiff in error.
    George M. Weichelt, for defendant in error.
    
      
      See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XIV, same topic and section number.
    
   Mr. Justice Clark

delivered the opinion of the court.