Case ID: ind-app_89/html/0713-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam. Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Schoonover v. Carpenter Construction Company.
    [No. 13,398.
    Filed March 8, 1929.
    Rehearing denied June 20, 1929.]
    
      Emsley W. Johnson, Chester L. Zechiel and Samuel J. Offult, for appellant.
    
      Henderson & Henderson and Henry W. Moore, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Affirmed, and ten per cent damages assessed.

On Petition for Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

There is merit in appellee’s contention that appellant has failed to comply with Rule 29 with reference to filing petitions for rehearing, and therefore has failed to present any question for rehearing. However, after consideration, the court concludes to remit the penalty assessed against appellant in its decision. With this modification the decision of the court affirming the judgment stands.