Case ID: cma_15/html/0493-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES, Appellee v ANASTACIO C. BILLONES, Chief Boatswain’s Mate, U. S. Navy, Appellant
    15 USCMA 493, 35 CMR 465
    No. 18,713
    July 23, 1965
    
      Fred W. Shields, Esquire, and Lieutenant John P. Meade, USNR, were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.
    
      Major Daniel F. McConnell, USMC, was on the brief for Appellee, United States.
   Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Tried by general court-martial and convicted, among other things, of an Additional Charge and specification of larceny, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 121, 10 USC § 921, the accused was sentenced to dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement at hard labor for ten years, and reduction. Intermediate appellate authorities, reducing the adjudged term of imprisonment to four years, have otherwise affirmed.

Examination of the record reveals that the law officer failed to instruct the court-martial on the elements of the offense alleged in the Additional Charge and specification. Such was prejudicial error. United States v Keith, 1 USCMA 442, 4 CMR 34; United States v Shepard, 1 USCMA 487, 4 CMR 79; United States v Walters, 10 USCMA 598, 28 CMR 164.

The petition for review is granted. The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy. The board may reassess the sentence on the basis of the remaining findings of guilty or order a rehearing on the Additional Charge and specification and the penalty.