Case ID: sw_138/html/0403-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HARPER., J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PALMER v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    June 7, 1911.)
    Criminal Law (§ 1144) — Appeal—Review— REC OR D — PEESUMPTIO N.
    The complaint and information being in proper form, it must be presumed, in the absence of bills of exception and a statement of facts, that the court submitted to the jury the law applicable to the case.
    [Ed. Note. — Eor other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. § 2767; Dec. Dig. § 1144.]
    Appeal from Brown County Court; A. M. Brumfield, Judge.
    J. ¡3. Palmer appeals from a conviction.
    Affirmed.
    O. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    
      
      For other eases see same topic and section NUMBER in Deo. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Rep’r Indexes
    
   HARPER., J.

Appellant was prosecuted under an information and complaint charging him with unlawfully carrying a pistol, and upon conviction his punishment was assessed at a fine of $100.

There are neither bills of exception nor a statement of facts in the record. Attached to the record is a letter written by appellant, in which he makes statements that would enlist the sympathy of any one; but this court is bound by the rules of law, and we cannot intentionally ignore the provisions of the law in regard to appeals and the filing of a statement of facts. The complaint and information being in proper form, we assume that the court submitted the law applicable to the case to the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.