Case ID: ri_114/html/0945-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Appeal No. 73-255.
    Edward A. Sullivan, Jr. et al. v. Dorothy M. Spicer et al.
    
    
      Letts, Quinn & Licht, Richard A. Licht, Alan S. Flink, for Edward A. Sullivan, Jr. Gunning, LaFazia & Gnys, Inc., Richard T. Linn, for defendants.
   Petition for reargument is denied. The defendants based their petition for reargument on the ground that they had not waived the question as to whether or not the plaintiff’s appeal should be dismissed because of failure to file a transcript as required by Super. R. Civ. P. 75(b). Assuming that the defendants are correct, this issue examined and considered and found without merit.