Case ID: ohio-st-3d_70/html/0397-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Smith et al., Appellants, v. Rudler, Appellee.
    [Cite as Smith v. Rudler (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 397.]
    (No. 93-2055
    Submitted August 31, 1994
    Decided September 28, 1994.)
    
      Yulish, Twohig & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Jeffrey S. Watson, for appellants.
    
      Bobulsky & Grdina and Timothy J. Bohanowski, for appellee.
    
      
      Licata & Crosby Co., L.P.A., Louis J. Licata and Elizabeth A. Crosby, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Adult Support for Incest Survivors of Today.
   The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for consideration and application of Ault v. Jasko (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 114, 637 N.E.2d 870.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Wright, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Ault v. Jasko (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 114, 637 N.E.2d 870.