Case ID: f-appx_160/html/0335-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dallice M. ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Kathleen A. Mika; Denise Riddle; Blake Gordan; Social Security Disability and Appeals, Defendants.
    No. 05-1646.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 22, 2005.
    Decided Jan. 4, 2006.
    Dallice M. Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Dallice Allen appeals from the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her complaint in which she asserted that the Social Security Administration unlawfully suspended her benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Allen v. Social Security Admin., No. CA-04-280 (D.S.C. filed Feb. 18, 2005; entered Feb. 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED