Case ID: f-appx_584/html/0182-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Steven A. GOYNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joel CAVAZOS, Police Officer (in his individual and official capacity); Timothy Santos, Police Officer (in his individual and official capacity); The City of Norfolk, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 14-1556.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 16, 2014.
    Decided: Oct. 20, 2014.
    
      Steven A. Goynes, Appellant Pro Se. Melvin Wayne Ringer, City Attorney’s Office, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven A. Goynes appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Goynes v. Cavazos, No. 2:13-cv-00542-AWA-LRL (E.D.Va. May 8, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.