Case ID: so3d_272/html/0465-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

M.N., a Juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D18-735
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed March 27, 2019
    Carlos J. Martinez, Miami, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker-Bradley, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
    Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kayla Heather McNab, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before EMAS, C.J., and LOGUE and MILLER, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See M.F. v. State, 255 So.3d 519, 519 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (When reviewing the adequacy of a Richardson hearing, a "ruling that no [discovery] violation occurred moots any inquiry into whether there was procedural prejudice."); see also Mascolo v. State, 774 So.2d 827, 829 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) ("[T]he trial court found there was no discovery violation. We find that the record supports the decision of the trial court and therefore we find no error.").