Case ID: f-appx_710/html/0173-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adam Joe Louis JORDAN, III, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 17-7241
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: January 30, 2018
    Decided: February 2, 2018
    Adam Joe Louis Jordan, III, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, Dana Owen Washington, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Adam Joe Louis Jordan, III, appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record included on appeal and find no reversible error and no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jordan, No, 5:11-cr-00011-RJC-DSC-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED