Case ID: so2d_723/html/0377-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

TRITON HOLDINGS, INC., Appellant, v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, etc., et al., Appellees.
    No. 98-767.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 30, 1998.
    J.R. Mazor & Associates, P.A., and Jeffrey R. Mazor, Hollywood, for appellant.
    
      Robert J. Schaffer, Coral Gables, for ap-pellee Virginia R. Pietro.
    Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and SHEVIN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Contrary to the appellant’s arguments, joint depositors must both be served with notice of garnishment proceedings to comport with due process of law. See § 77.055, Fla. Stat. (1995). Accordingly, the trial court was correct in finding that the notice was deficient.

Affirmed.