Case ID: sw3d_540/html/0889-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael FORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 105646
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: March 6, 2018
    FOR APPELLANT: Susan DeGeorge, Office of the Missouri Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
    FOR RESPONDENT: Chris Koster, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
    Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Michael Ford appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).