Case ID: so2d_452/html/1125-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eugene Anthony CHESTNUT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 84-98.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 17, 1984.
    
      Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Gelber, Glass, Durant & Grande and N. Joseph Durant, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Calvin L. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before HUBBART, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The trial court did not err in giving the jury an instruction on “principals” after closing arguments, even though the instruction had not been requested at the charge conference. See Jacobs v. State, 396 So.2d 713 (Fla.1981).

Affirmed.