Case ID: us_19/html/0448-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(Practice.)
    Gibbons v. Ogden.
    A decree of the highest Court of Equity of a State, affirming the de> cretal order of an inferior Court of Equity of the same State, refusing to dissolve an injunction granted on the. filing of the bill, is not a final decree within the 25tb section of the judiciary act of 1789, . c. 20. from, which an appeal lies to this Court.
    Appeal from the Court for the Trial of Impeachments and the Correction of Errors of the State of New-York.
    This was a bill filed by the plaintiff .helow, (Ogden,) against the defendant below, (Gibbons,) in the Court of Chancery of the State of New-York, for an injunction to restrain the defendant from navigating certain steam boats on the waters of the State of New-York, lying between Elizabethtown, in the State of New-Jersey, and the City of New-York; the exclusive navigation of which with steam boats had been granted, by the legislature of New-York, to Livingston and Fulton, under whom the plaintiff below claimed as assignee. On this bill an injunction was granted by the Chancellor, and on the coming in of the answer, which set up a right to navigate with steam boats between the City of New-York and Elizabethtown, under a license to carry on the coasting trade, granted under the laws of the United States, the defendant below moved to dissolve the injunction, which motion was denied by the Chancellor. The defendant below appealed to the Court for the Trial of Impeachments and the Correction of Errors; the decretal order, refusing to dissolve the injunction, was affirmed by that Court; and from this last order the defendant below appealed to this Court, upon the ground, that the case involved a question arising under the constitution, laws, and treaties of the United States.
    
      March 8th.
    
    The cause was opened for the appellant, by Mr. D. B. Ogden;
    
    but on inspecting the record, it not appearing that any final decree in the caiise, within the terms of the 25th section of the judiciary act of 1789, e. 20. had been pronounced in the State Court, the appeal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
   Decree. This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record of the Court for the Trial of Impeachments and the Correction of Errors, of th,e State of New-York. On inspection . whereof, it is. ordered, that the appeal, nr this cause, be¿ and the same is. hereby dismissed, it not appearing from the record that there was a final decree in said Court for the Correction of Errors, &c. from which an appeal was taken. 
      
      
         Vide 4 Johns. Ch.Rep. 150. and 17 Johns. Rep. 488. where ■the learned reader will find the case reported as decided in the State Courts.