Case ID: so2d_458/html/1171-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Malcolm WINFIELD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, Appellee.
    No. 83-2521.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 6, 1984.
    Rehearing Denied Dec. 17, 1984.
    Milton E. Grusmark, Miami, Sheryl Low-enthal, Coral Gables, for appellant.
    Elliot Henslovitz, Staff Atty., Miami, for appellee.
    Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The final order of the Division of PariMutuel Wagering is affirmed upon a holding that there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the hearing officer’s determinations, which were adopted by the Division, that Winfield violated three rules of the Florida Administrative Code.

Affirmed.