Case ID: so2d_744/html/1253-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rolando GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 99-1468.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 24, 1999.
    Rolando Gonzalez, in proper person.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Lara J. Edelstein, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and GREEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We find that all of the issues raised by the appellant in his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 8.850 are issues which were, should have, and/or could have been raised on his direct appeal to this court and therefore, is not properly cognizable in a rule 3.850. See Harvey v. Dugger, 656 So.2d 1258 (Fla.1995); Jackson v. State, 646 So.2d 792 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Thus, we conclude that the trial court properly denied the appellant’s motion.

Affirmed.