Case ID: f-appx_6/html/0195-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Guy Lancaster RICHMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden MOATS, M.C.T.C.; Warden Sacchet, R.C.T.C.; Correctional Department; State of Maryland, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 00-7590.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted March 22, 2001.
    Decided March 28, 2001.
    Guy Lancaster Richmond, pro se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.
    Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Guy Lancaster Richmond appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Richmond v. Moats, No. CA-00-1147WMN (D.Md. filed Oct. 27, 2000; entered Oct. 31, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.