Case ID: ohio-st-3d_66/html/0074-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 74.]
    (No. 92-2538
    Submitted February 2, 1993
    Decided April 7, 1993.)
    
      
      J. Warren Bettis, Disciplinary Counsel, and Harald F. Craig III, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
    
      Koblentz & Koblentz and Richard S. Koblentz, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Upon review of the evidence, we hereby adopt the findings of the board. We decline, however, to adopt the board’s recommended sanction, finding that respondent’s misconduct warrants a more severe penalty. Accordingly, respondent is hereby permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyek, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.