Case ID: so2d_578/html/0390-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BALDAN IMPLEMENTOS AGRICOLAS, S.A., Appellant, v. AGRIDISC AND IMPLEMENTS CORPORATION, Appellee.
    No. 90-2472.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 16, 1991.
    Klayman & Associates, P.C., and Larry Klayman and Frederick J. Sujat, Washington, D.C., Manzini & Associates, P.A., and Nicolas A. Manzini, Miami, for appellant.
    Harvey D. Rogers, Miami, for appellee.
    Before FERGUSON, JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Baldan appeals from a nonfinal order of partial summary judgment. We reverse.

Genuine issues of material fact on the issue of whether the appellee assigned its right to payment to Baldan precluded the entry of partial summary judgment in this case. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966).

Accordingly, the partial summary judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.