Case ID: f-appx_512/html/0375-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kenneth WHITMORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jonathan ARD; James L. Goldsmith, Jr.; Mitchell Byrd, Jr.; Edward W. Miller, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 12-7999.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 26, 2013.
    Decided: March 1, 2013.
    Kenneth Whitmore, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Whitmore appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2006) review. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Whitmore v. Ard, No. 6:12-cv-01049-JMC (D.S.C. Oct. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.