Case ID: sw3d_62/html/0628-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. James PURKETT and Phyllis Byland, Respondents.
    No. ED 79614.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Dec. 4, 2001.
    William Alexander, Farmington, MO, pro se.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stephen D. Hawke, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Aexander appeals the dismissal of his petition for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief against James Purk-ett, the superintendent, and Phyllis By-land, the records officer, at the Farming-ton Correctional Center, requesting that he be given all jail-time credit for which he was entitled. The trial court dismissed the suit finding that Defendant did not assert a claim upon which relief could be granted. We find no error and affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. We have, however, furnished the parties with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).