Case ID: sw2d_829/html/0677-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kenneth E. HEINTZ, Appellant, v. The SUBURBAN JOURNALS OF GREATER ST. LOUIS, et al., Respondents.
    No. 60760.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    June 2, 1992.
    Synder, Wier, Shaller and Bachman, Eric J. Snyder, Clayton, for appellant.
    Husch & Eppenberger, Caroline L. Her-meling, St. Louis, for respondents.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing Counts I and II of his two count second amended petition in a civil case with prejudice. An extended opinion would not have precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).