Case ID: so3d_219/html/0854-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kim Duane CAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D16-2997
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    [May 24, 2017]
    Melissa Montle and Seth E. Miller of Innocence Project of Florida, Inc., Tallahassee, for appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Affirmed. See Scott v. State, 46 So.3d 529, 532-33 (Fla. 2009) (any error in trial court’s finding that defendant’s motion for postconviction DNA testing was technically insufficient was harmless where defendant’s motion for postconviction DNA testing was legally insufficient because he failed to show a reasonable probability existed that the test results would exonerate him).

Gerber, Conner and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.