Case ID: sw2d_916/html/0841-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kristian GIPPO, Appellant, v. Katherine F. WAINRIGHT, Respondent.
    No. 68436.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Jan. 23, 1996.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 28, 1996.
    Carl W. Becker, Ira M. Berkowitz, Lander & Berkowitz, Clayton, for appellant.
    Donald O’Keefe, Rabbitt, Pitzer & Snod-grass, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before SMITH, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Kristian Gippo, appeals from the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, granting respondent’s, Katherine F. Wainright’s, motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the order of the circuit court is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. As we further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).