Case ID: f-appx_312/html/0689-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Donald A. ELFER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant v. Pete GEREN, Secretary of the Army; United States Department of Army, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 08-30867.
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    March 4, 2009.
    James Ashley Endicott, Jr., Endicott Law Offices, Harker Heights, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Janice E. Hebert, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The judgment Of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by that court in its ruling of July 8, 2008. This court has now reviewed everything in this record and, contrary to the unsupported statements of counsel, we find no evidence that would raise an issue to support any claim of plaintiff for relief. No prima facie case of age or gender discrimination is made. No issue of causal connection between defendant’s employment action and his prior EEO complaint against the Army is shown. The defendant presented evidence to explain that plaintiffs failure of training and performance was the reason for denial of his position at Fort Polk. Plaintiff presented no evidence of pretext or discriminatory motivation.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.