Case ID: so2d_445/html/1031-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel C. FOWLER, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD, Appellee. Paul S. PARISER, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD, Appellee.
    Nos. 83-221, 83-222.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Jan. 4, 1984.
    Rehearing Denied March 19, 1984.
    Cynthia S. Tunnicliff of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, Tallahassee, for appellant.
    John S. Kalil of Sinoff & Alford, Jacksonville, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm because no reversible error has been made to appear and because the agency action is supported by record competent substantial evidence. Boyette v. State, Professional Practices Council, 346 So.2d 598 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) and Pauline v. Lee, 147 So.2d 359 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962).

Affirmed.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.