Case ID: sw3d_547/html/0604-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Boyce BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 105604
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    Filed: May 15, 2018
    Casey A. Taylor, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203, for Appellant.
    Richard A. Starnes, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent.
    Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J. and Philip M. Hess, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM

Boyce Brown (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. His sole point on appeal is that the motion court erred in determining that his trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to call an alibi witness. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).