Case ID: nj-eq_65/html/0719-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph M. Perrine et al., respondents, v. William D. Perrine et al., appellants.
    [Filed June 19th, 1903.]
    
      Mr. Haward W. Ilayes,- for the appellant.
    
      Mr. John T. Rosell, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from should be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, delivered in the court of chancery, and reported in 18 Dick. Ch. Rep. 483.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Garrison, Garretson, Bogert, Voori-iees, Vroom — 7.

For reversal — Dixon, Fort, Hendrickson, Swayze, Vredenburgi-i — 5.