Case ID: sw_165/html/0523-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "RAINEY, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JONES v. MYERS et al.
    (Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Dallas.
    April 4, 1914.)
    Damages (§ 228) — Harmless Eekob — Admission oe Evidence.
    Any error in admitting testimony and refusing charges as to an item of $21.50 were harmless, where such item was remitted by ap-pellee.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Damages, Cent. Dig. §§ 576-579; Dec. Dig. § 228.]
    Appeal from Yan Zandt County Court; C. L. Stanford, Judge.
    Action by Fletcher Jones against Elijah and Sam Myers. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
    Affirmed.
    T. R. Yantis, of Canton, for appellant. L. Davidson and M. G. Sanders, both of Canton, for appeilees.
    
      
      For otter oases see same topic and section NUMBER in Deo. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key-No. Series & Rep’r Indexes
    
   RAINEY, C. J.

Suit by appellant against appellees to recover on a promissory note ¿nd to foreclose a mortgage. Appellees plead payment of the note, and, in addition, $21.50 over and above the amount of the note. A trial resulted in a judgment in favor of ap-pellees for $21.50), which was remitted, and appellant prosecutes this appeal.

Two of appellant’s assignments relate to the court’s action in admitting testimony and refusing a special charge, which pertains to the item of $21.50. As that amount ivas remitted by appellant, the assignments are without merit. The other assignments complain of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment.

The evidence shows that the note was paid off and discharged.

There is no error in the judgment, and it is affirmed.