Case ID: hill_7/html/0529-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "The Chancellor and Senators Hard and Lott", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rudd and another vs. Davis.
    A nonsuit may be ordered at the trial after evidence has been given on both sides, if a verdict for the plaintiff would be. against the clear weight and effect of the evidence.
    On error from the supreme court. For a report of the case in that court, see 3 Hill, 287 et seq. It was argued here by
    
      C. O’Conor, for the plaintiffs in error, and
    
      J L. Mason <Sf J. P. Hall, for the defendant in error.
   The Chancellor and Senators Hard and Lott

delivered opinions concurring substantially with the view taken of the case by the supreme court. And

On the question being put, “ Shall this judgment be reversed ?” all the members present who heard the argument, thirteen in number, voted for affirming.

Judgment affirmed.