Case ID: cust-ct_4/html/0360-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 42976.
    Protests 711932-G, etc., of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) rubber articles similar to those the subject of Abstract 41517 at 25 percent under paragraph 1537; (2) uninflated rubber balls at 30 percent under paragraph 1502, United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) followed; (3) siren whistles and horns similar to those the subject of Abstracts 39948 and 40480 at 45 percent under paragraph 397; aDd (4) novelties in chief value of rubber at 25 percent under paragraph 1537 (b), Abstract 25607 followed.