Case ID: sw2d_989/html/0956-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Francis MACKENBERG, Employee/Appellant, v. ST. CHARLES SCRAP METAL AND AUTO PARTS, INC., Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Respondent.
    No. 74903.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    May 4, 1999.
    Thomas M. Kendrick, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Beverly E. Temple, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before JAMES A. PUDLOWSKI, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL Jr., J., and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Francis Mackenberg, claimant, appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. Claimant argues that the Commission’s findings were not supported by substantial and competent evidence. He alleges that certain hospital bills were “reasonable and necessary and causally related to the injuries sustained” by claimant.”

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. The Commission’s award was supported by substantial and competent evidence. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).