Case ID: nc_1/html/0273-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hall vs. Gerrard.
    Mich. 3 Car.
    NOY for the plaintiff.
    It has been objected that the traverse
    de injurie is not good, where the justification is by reason of a free tenement or lease for years. But yet the plaintiff ought to have judgment.
    1. Because the justification here is not in the realty alone, but mixed with the personalty: And where it is mixed with the personalty, de injuria sua propria is a good traverse; and it is necessary to traverse the title, as the defendant pretends. 8 H. 6. 34. Also, the justification is not on the lease, but on the assault, by putting his hands molliter on him, to put him out. So the realty is only an inducement to the justification.
    
      2. Their title is not certain, nor traversable by reason of their lease pro termino diversorum annorum; and this uncertainly we cannot traverse, as they have shewn no certain tern.
    3. By this demurrer our plea is confessed; that it was de injura sua propria, and then, although the issue be not well tendered, yet the demurrer having confessed the tort, judgment ought to be according to the justice of the case, by 27 El. 5.p, 332.
   Th defendant not being ready, a day was given him.

Boo of Entries, titles Assault, Placito 17, p. 554. Afterwards jdgment was given for the plaintiff. Antea, p. 20. 128, 21.