Case ID: so2d_460/html/1013-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. DIVERSIFIED WATER SYSTEMS CORPORATION and Virgil Lepar, Appellees.
    No. 84-885.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 26, 1984.
    Charles B. Atwood, III, and Theresa E. Dalba, Miami, for appellant.
    Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Strickroot and Michael J. Murphy and Michael Kennedy, Miami, for appellees.
    Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants Diversified Water Systems Corporation and Virgil Le-par upon a holding that the evidence before the trial court does not establish, as a matter of law, an accord and satisfaction. See Redding v. Powell, 452 So.2d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); see also Miller-Dunn Co. v. Green, 154 Fla. 72, 16 So.2d 637 (1944).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.