Case ID: f-appx_623/html/0880-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Devon John McKENNA; Cynthia McKenna, Debtors, Devon John McKenna; Cynthia McKenna, Appellants, v. Michael D. Hitt, Chapter 7 Trustee; et al., Appellees.
    No. 13-60091.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 18, 2015.
    
    Filed Nov. 30, 2015.
    Devon John McKenna, Rainier, WA, pro se.
    Cynthia McKenna, Rainier, WA, pro se.
    Michael D. Hitt, University Place, WA, pro se.
    Daniel T. Davies, Esquire, Hugh Robert McCullough, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Seattle, WA, for Appellees.
    Before: TASHIMA, OWENS, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Chapter 7 debtors Devon John and Cynthia McKenna appeal pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) order denying their motion for rehearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review for an abuse of discretion. In re Fowler, 394 F.3d 1208, 1214 (9th Cir.2005). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the McKennas’ motion for rehearing because the McKennas failed to raise any point of law or fact allegedly overlooked or misapprehended by the BAP concerning their lack of standing to prosecute the adversary proceeding. See id.

We reject the McKennas’ contention that the bankruptcy judge was biased against them.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.