Case ID: misc2d_35/html/0175-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cloverdale Garden Apartments, Inc., Appellant, v. Steven Martin, Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    March 28, 1962.
    
      
      Dorsey é Berko (Louis J. Berko of counsel), for appellant. Brennan é Landers for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The presence of the washing machine in tenant’s apartment, connected to the plumbing and requiring but the turn of a dial to put it in operation, constituted continued installation and use ” of the machine in contravention of lease provision 23. (Emanden Realty Corp. v. Angley, 24 Misc 2d 877 [App. Term, 1st Dept.]; cf. L. H. Estates Co. v. Bartholomew, 9 Misc 2d 116 [App. Term, 1st Dept.], affd. 5 A D 2d 815.)

The final order should be unanimously reversed, with $30 costs to landlord, and final order directed for landlord with appropriate costs in the court below. If tenant disconnects and removes the washing machine from his apartment within 5 days after the service of a copy of the order entered hereon, with notice of entry, the eviction is stayed until further order of the court.

Concur — Hart, Brown and Benjamin, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.