Case ID: utah-2d_27/html/0142-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HENRIOD, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

493 P.2d 984
    Fred W. BENTINE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. H. G. TALMADGE and Adelene Talmadge, his wife, Defendants and Appellants.
    No. 12333.
    Supreme Court of Utah.
    Feb. 23, 1972.
    Peter M. Lowe, Salt Lake City, for defendants-appellants.
    Grant S. Kesler, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff-respondent.
   HENRIOD, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff on account of electrical work and equipment furnished at defendants’ home. Affirmed, with no costs awarded.

On conflicting evidence, the court found a very small sum due plaintiff, in a case where the loss of had blood between the parties requires no legal transfusion. We believe that any infection born of this case should be terminal, justifying its demise and decent interment. Though the trial court might have concluded otherwise on believable facts, its decision is bottomed on equally believable facts, which, if believed, attest to its decision, — which we affirm under familiar rules of review.

We concur.

CALLISTER, C. J., and TUCKETT, ELLETT and CROCKETT, JJ., concur.