Case ID: f-appx_252/html/0117-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronald L. SATTERLEE, Appellant, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; United States America; Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Appellees.
    No. 06-3776.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 25, 2007.
    Filed: Oct. 25, 2007.
    Ronald L. Satterlee, Ava, MO, pro se.
    Michael J. Haungs, John A. Nolet, Laquita Taylor-Phillips, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Appellees.
    Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Ronald L. Satterlee appeals the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his action challenging the result of a collection due process hearing relating to tax deficiencies and a civil penalty assessed against him. Upon this court’s de novo review, we conclude dismissal was proper for the reasons given by the district court. See Ferris, Baker Watts, Inc. v. Ernst & Young, L.L.P., 395 F.3d 851, 853 (8th Cir.2005) (Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal standard of review). We also conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Satterlee’s motion to reconsider. See MIF Realty, L.P. v. Rochester Associates, 92 F.3d 752, 755 (8th Cir.1996) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.