Case ID: f-appx_550/html/0009-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James D. SCHNELLER, Appellant v. SUPREME COURT OF the UNITED STATES, Clerk, Appellee.
    Nos. 13-5233, 13-5234.
    United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
    Dec. 30, 2013.
    James D. Schneller, St. Davids, PA, pro se.
    R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
    BEFORE: TATEL and SRINIVASAN, Circuit Judges; GINSBURG, Senior Circuit Judge.
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed December 11, 2012, be affirmed. The district court correctly held it has no authority to order the Clerk of the Supreme Court to accept appellant’s pleadings or to take any other action. See Marin v. Suter, 956 F.2d 339 (D.C.Cir.1992) (per curiam). Moreover, the district court properly exercised its discretion in denying reconsideration of the order dismissing the action with prejudice because appellant stated no basis for such relief, nor has he proferred any amendment to the complaint that would establish the district court’s jurisdiction. See Firestone v. Firestone, 76 F.3d 1205, 1208-09 (D.C.Cir.1996).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.