Case ID: nj-eq_138/html/0111-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Quigley Company, Inc., respondent, v. Asbestos Limited, Inc., appellant.
    [Decided May 3d, 1946.]
    
      Mr. Max L. Rosenstein, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. George L. Burton (Mr. Morris Spritzer, of counsel), for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the Court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder and printed in 23 N. J. Mis. R. 301.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Oliphant, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, McGeehan, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.