Case ID: ny_299/html/0308-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Accounting of Anna M. Barry, as Substituted Trustee under the Will of Albert Burk, Deceased. Anna M. Barry, Individually, et al., Appellants. Anna M. Barry, as Substituted Trustee under the Will of Albert Burk, Deceased, et al., Respondents.
    Submitted April 11, 1949;
    decided June 3, 1949.
    
      Jack Korshin and F. Lloyd Barry for appellants.
    
      Frank B. Abbott for Mary E. Wright, respondent.
   Per Curiam.

As defined by the Statute of Descent and Distribution, next of Mn ” and “ distributee ” mean the distributees including a surviving spouse, who are defined in section 83 of the Decedent Estate Law (Decedent Estate Law, § 47-c; L. 1938, ch. 181). Having affirmed the Surrogate’s ruling that the remainder herein vested on death of the life tenant Annie Burk, we ruled in effect [see 298 ÜST. T. 450] that such remainder was distributable per stirpes to the “ brothers and sisters living, and the descendants in whatever degree of those dead ” (Decedent Estate Law, § 83, subd. 6; L. 1929, ch. 229). The per stirpes share to which Michael Brady, predeceased brother of life tenant, would have been entitled had he survived, or, having died, to which his son Albert would have been entitled as a descendant had he lived, may not be paid to Ella, Michael’s surviving spouse, as next of kin ” and “ distributee ” as defined in section 47-c, because she is not a descendant of Michael within the meaning of subdivision 6 of section 83 of the Decedent Estate Law.

The relationship and dates of the deaths of the various individuals not being in dispute, there is no need for reargument of the appeal herein. The remittitur however, should be amended so as to eliminate Ella Brady as a distributee.

Loughran, Oh. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Bromley, JJ., concur.

Motion for reargument denied. Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended to read as follows:

“ Order of Appellate Division reversed and decree of Surrogate’s Court modified so as to provide that Ella M. Brady is not entitled to a distributive share as a next of kin of Michael Brady, deceased, and the decree otherwise affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division to the appellants payable out of the estate.” [See 298 N". Y. 450.]