Case ID: so2d_561/html/0436-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Florence London ROSENBERG, Petitioner, v. Simeon BURGESS and Clarissa Burgess, his wife, Respondents.
    No. 90-0699.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 16, 1990.
    Robert I. Buchsbaum of Conroy, Simberg & Lewis, P.A., Hollywood, for petitioner.
    Gary E. Garbis of Gary E. Garbis, P.A., Miami, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

Here, as in Waste Management, Inc. v. Southern Bell, 544 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), the trial court prematurely terminated its inquiry into petitioner’s work product objection, and departed from the essential requirements of law in determining that petitioner had no right to object to producing items which she herself had asked respondents to produce. Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of certio-rari, quash the trial court’s February 12, 1990, and March 12, 1990, orders, and remand the case so the court can entertain petitioner’s work product objection on its merits.

DOWNEY, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.