Case ID: so2d_428/html/0729-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John Robert HURLEY, Appellant, v. Jane Ann Dimon HURLEY, Appellee.
    No. 82-1482.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 15, 1983.
    Rehearing Denied April 13, 1983.
    Barrett & Rogers and William Rogers, Miami, for appellant.
    Floyd, Pearson, Stewart, Richman, Greer & Weil and Bertha Claire Lee and Bruce Christensen, Miami, for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment in all respects except the issue of the wife’s attorney’s fees, which we conclude are properly chargeable to her. See Golden v. Golden, 410 So.2d 945 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 419 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1982); Pepper v. Pepper, 388 So.2d 1342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Pusey v. Pusey, 386 So.2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Bullard v. Bullard, 380 So.2d 1090 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.