Case ID: so2d_658/html/0438-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles SULLIVAN v. MAZAK CORPORATION, a/k/a Mazak Sales and Service. MAZAK CORPORATION v. Charles W. SULLIVAN and Josephine Sullivan, d/b/a Sullivan Machine. Ex parte MAZAK CORPORATION. (In re Charles W. SULLIVAN and Josephine Sullivan d/b/a Sullivan Machine & Tool Company v. MAZAK CORPORATION, et al.).
    1921850, 1931307 and 1931735.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    March 10, 1995.
    W. Kenneth Gibson, Fairhope, for appellant/cross appellee/respondent Charles W. Sullivan.
    Ray M. Thompson, David E. Hudgens and Coleman F. Meador of Armbrecht, Jackson, DeMouy, Crowe, Holmes & Reeves, Mobile, for appellee/cross appellant/petitioner Mazak Corp.
   PER CURIAM.

Appeal number 1981307 is dismissed, because the grant of a Rule 60(b), Ala.R.Civ.P., motion is generally not appealable. Ex parte Short, 434 So.2d 728 (Ala.1983). The petition for the writ of mandamus is denied, because, after a review of the materials submitted in support of, and those submitted in opposition to, the petition, the Court has determined that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in granting relief. Cf. Rule 53(a)(1) and 53(a)(2)(F), Ala.R.App.P. Appeal number 1921850 is rendered moot by the grant of the Rule 60(b)(6) motion and by our denial of the petition for the writ of mandamus.

1921850 — APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT.

1931307 — APPEAL DISMISSED.

1931735 — WRIT DENIED.

ALMON, SHORES, HOUSTON, INGRAM and BUTTS, JJ., concur.