Case ID: nj-eq_90/html/0601-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James M. Dunlap, respondent, v. Emma D. Chenoweth et al., appellants.
    [Decided May 8th, 1919.]
    On appeal from an order of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 88 N. J. Eq. 496.
    
    
      Mr. David O. Watkins, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. Timothy J. Middleton and Mr. Herbert A. Drake, for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaliscit, Black, White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER — 13.

For reversal — None.