Case ID: ny-sup-ct_96/html/0607-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pratt, J.:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Orazio Valenti and Another, Composing the Firm of Valenti & Priore, Respondents, v. Richard B. Constantine and Another, Appellants.
    Judgment affirmed, with costs.—
   Pratt, J.:

We are of opinion that the referee’s conclusions are sustained by the testimony. Not only was there considerable evidence that Constantine had personal notice of the work done by the plaintiffs, but it seems pretty well established that the tenant had authority to make repairs. He made them for some years, and until the present instance his authority was never questioned. There are no exceptions that require notice, and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Brown, P. J., and Dykman, J., concurred.