Case ID: sw2d_789/html/0099-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mark DUCEPT, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.
    No. 56708.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    March 20, 1990.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 25, 1990.
    Application to Transfer Denied June 19, 1990.
    Elizabeth R. Brown, St. Louis, for mov-ant-appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert Y. Franson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent-respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing of his rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).