Case ID: njl_113/html/0034-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GIANT TIGER CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF TRENTON, RESPONDENT.
    Submitted February 16, 1934
    — Decided May 4, 1934.
    For the appellants, Alexander Budson and Henry Hartman.
    
    For the respondents, Charles B. Bird and Romulus P. Rimo.
    
   Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Teenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Hehee, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Wells, Dill, JJ. 10.

For reversal — The Chief Justice, Peeskie, Deae, JJ. 3.