Case ID: njl_92/html/0645-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. MORRIS RUDNER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    Argued November 27, 1918
    Decided March 3, 1919.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported m 92 N. J. L. 20.
    For the plaintiff in error, A. Dayton Oliphant and Martin P. Devlin.
    
    For the defendant in error, Harry Heher, Aaron V. Dawes and John A. Montgomery.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Chief Justice. The supplement thereto by our opinion just filed in State v. Levin (ante p. 553) is applicable also to the present case.

(For dissenting opinion by the Chancellor, see ante p. 555.)

For affirmance — Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Heppenheimer, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 8.

For reversal — The Chancellor, White, Williams, JJ. 3.