Case ID: f-appx_670/html/0704-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NETFLIX, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee v. ROVI CORPORATION, Rovi Technologies Corporation, Rovi Guides, Inc., fka Gemstar-Tv Guide International, Inc., United Video Properties, Inc., Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellants APTIV Digital, Inc., Starsight Telecast, Inc., Counterclaimants-Appellants
    2015-1917
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    November 7, 2016
    Michael Soonuk Kwun, Keker & Van Nest, LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-appellee. Also represented by Ashok Ramani, Sharif E. Jacob, Edward A. Bayley.
    Jeffrey A. Lamken, MoloLamken LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants/counterclaimants-appellants and counterclaimants-appellants. Also represented by Michael Gregory Pattillo, Jr.; John M. Whealan, Chevy Chase, MD; Lawrence ■ Milton Hadley, Roderick George Dorman, McKool Smith Hennigan, P.C., Los Angeles, CA; Joel Lance Thol-lander, McKool Smith, PC, Austin, TX.
    Charles R. Macedo, Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP, New York, NY, for amici curiae Broadband iTV, Inc., Double Rock Corporation, Island Intellectual Property, LLC, Access Control Advantage, Inc., Fairway Financial U.S., Inc. Also represented by Sandra A. Hudak.
   JUDGMENT

Per Curiam (Lourie, Moore, and O’Malley, Circuit Judges).

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.