Case ID: so2d_884/html/0919-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte Stephen R. QUETGLES. (In re Stephen R. Quetgles v. State of Alabama).
    1021242.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Jan. 30, 2004.
    V. A Pennington, Mobile, for petitioner.
    
      William H. Pryor, Jr., atty. gen., Nathan A. Forrester, deputy atty. gen., and Michael B. Billingsley, asst. atty. gen., for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

,. . . Ihe petition for the writ of certiorari is quashed.

In quashing the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED.

HOUSTON, SEE, LYONS, BROWN, JOHNSTONE, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur.