Case ID: fla_132/html/0594-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ed O’Brian and Dan Hansford and Samson Stanley v. State.
    181 So. 532.
    Opinion Filed May 21, 1938.
    
      H. V. McClellan, for Plaintiffs in Error;
    
      Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and Tyrus A. Nor-wood, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
   Per Curiam.

To a conviction of the offense of aggravated assault, plaintiffs in error sued out writ of error.

The only contention made as ground for reversal is that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict.

The evidence was conflicting but the jury within its province resolved the conflicts against the contentions of the accused.

The record discloses substantial evidence to support the judgment and, as the whole record discloses no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.