Case ID: so2d_245/html/0253-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTH FLORIDA, a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. CITY OF HALLANDALE, Florida, a municipal corporation, et al., Respondents. Clifton MEEKINS et al., Petitioners, v. CITY OF HALLANDALE, Florida, a municipal corporation, et al., Respondents.
    Nos. 40118, 40135.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Feb. 3, 1971.
    Rehearing Denied March 17, 1971.
    Marion E. Sibley and Allan M. Glaser of Sibley, Giblin, Levenson & Ward, Miami Beach, for Investment Corp. of South Florida.
    Ellis Spencer & Butler and Ralph R. Quillian, Hollywood, for Clifton Meekins, and others.
    Fred J. Ward of Crouch, Ward & Africano, Hallendale, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

The District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, having certified to us that its decision in the cases of City of Hallandale v. Meekins et al., and City of Hallandale v. Investment Corporation of South Florida (Fla.App.1970), 237 So.2d 318, passes upon a question of great public interest, we accepted jurisdiction for review pursuant to Article V, Section 4(2) of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A.

After hearing oral argument and carefully reviewing the briefs and the record, we have come to the conclusion that the decision of the District Court is correct and we adopt it as the decision of this

Court. The writ, therefore, is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

CARLTON, J., dissents.