Case ID: ga-app_30/html/0260-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

14326,14327.
    Stacer v. Central of Georgia Railway Company; and vice versa.
    
    Decided May 15, 1923.
   Broyles, C. J.

1. The verdict in favor of the defendant was amply authorized by the evidence, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial requires a reversal of the judgment below refusing to grant a new trial.

2. In view of the above ruling it is unnecessary to consider the. cross-bill of exceptions.

Judgment on maim bill of exceptions affirmed; cross-bill dismissed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Action for damages; from city court of Millen — Judge Dekle. December 30, 1922. See 20 Ga. App. 195.

Oliver & Oliver, J. T. Chapman, A. S. Anderson, for plaintiff.

James A. Dixon, Charles G. Reynolds, for defendant.