Case ID: f-appx_627/html/0925-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PRICEPLAY.COM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. AOL ADVERTISING, INC., Facebook Inc., Google Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
    Nos. 2015-1492, 2015-1589, 2015-1660.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    Jan. 7, 2016.
    Scott Daniels, Westerman, Hattori, Daniels & Adrian, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by Darrin A. Auito.
    Daryl Joseffer, King & Spalding LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellees. Appellee Google Inc., also represented by Paul Alessio Mezzina; Adam Conrad, Charlotte, NC. Appellee AOL Advertising, Inc., also represented by George Frank Pappas, Peter Andrew Swanson, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC. Appellee Facebook Inc., also represented by Heidi Lyn Keefe, Mark R. Weinstein, Lam K. Nguyen, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA; Michael Graham Rhodes, San Francisco, CA.
    MOORE, BRYSON, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.