Case ID: sw3d_302/html/0743-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Cornelius A. SUTTON, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 92297.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Jan. 26, 2010.
    
      Terrence M. Messonnier, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Margaret M. Johnston, Woodrail Cen-tre, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
    Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Cornelius A. Sutton, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of involuntary manslaughter, in violation of section 565.024 RSMo (2000); robbery in the first degree, in violation of section 569.020 RSMo (2000); and burglary in the first degree, in violation"’ of "section’ 569.160 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment on the involuntary manslaughter count; life imprisonment on the robbery count; and thirty years imprisonment on the burglary count, to be served consecutively.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 80.25(b).