Case ID: nys_63/html/1114-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PEPLOE, Respondent, v. CONNERS, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    March 5, 1900.)
    Action by John W. Peploe against Thomas J. Conners. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.
   PER CURIAM.

The record shows that the trial justice found that the plaintiff had done the work in a thorough, workmanlike manner, and therefore the questions propounded to defendant’s experts which were disallowed by the trial justice became immaterial. If the work was in fact finished as required by the contract, the questions above referred to were unnecessary. Judgment affirmed, with costs.