Case ID: nj-eq_134/html/0409-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Margaret M. Rusch, executrix, &c., et al., respondents, v. Henry J. Melosh, executor, et al., appellants.
    [Decided February 1st, 1944.]
    
      Mr. Raymond J. Lamb, for the respondents.
    
      Messrs. Milton, McNulty & Augelli, for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by YiceChancellor Egan, and reported at 133 N. J. Eq. 502.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Donges, FIehbr, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, Thompson, JJ. 8.

For reversal — Parker, Case, Colie, Rafferty, Hague, Dill, JJ. 6.