Case ID: f-appx_499/html/0629-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rhonda GOLDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION; Michelle Hughes; Tom O’Connell, district manager; Ruth Greggory, risk management; Gaylon Keetis, regional manager; Kimberly Knaff; Ray LNU, store manager, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 12-3027.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 14, 2013.
    Filed: March 1, 2013.
    Rhonda Golden, Grandview, MO, pro se.
    James R. Holland, II, Ashley Shaney-felt, Fisher & Phillips, argued, Kansas City, MO, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before MURPHY, SMITH, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Rhonda Golden appeals the district court’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of her complaint. After careful de novo review, see Palmer v. Ill. Farmers Ins. Co., 666 F.3d 1081, 1083 (8th Cir.2012), we conclude that the dismissal was proper because Golden’s complaint did not allege sufficient facts to support any of her claims, see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) (complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, that states facially plausible claim for relief). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.