Case ID: njl_104/html/0432-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam;.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ARMOUR & COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF JERSEY CITY ET AL., APPELLANTS.
    Argued October 31, 1927
    Decided February 6, 1928.
    For the respondent, John Milton.'
    For the appellants, Thomas J. Brogan.
    
   Pee Cueiam;.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Teenchabd, Mintubn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McG-lennon, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 13.

.For reversal — None.