Case ID: mont_354/html/0093-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

From: The District Court of the 20th Judicial District. County of Lake.
    STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. GABRIEL ZAVALA, Defendant,
    CAUSE NO. DC-08-73 DECISION
   On July 17, 2009, the defendant was sentenced as follows: Count T: Twenty (20) years in the Montana State Prison, with ten (10) years suspended, for the offense of Criminal Mischief, a felony; Count II: Six (6) months in the Lake County Jail, with all suspended except 30 days, for the offense of Theft, a misdemeanor; and Count III: Six (6) months in the Lake County Jail, with all suspended except 30 days, for the offense of Possession of Burglary Tools, a misdemeanor Counts I, II and III shall run concurrently with each other. The Defendant was designated a Persistent Felony Offender.

On November 12, 2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Kara Docherty. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 12th day of November, 2009.

DATED this 25th day of November, 2009.

Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Hon. Richard Simonton.