Case ID: f-appx_344/html/0369-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fermin Lee HAWEE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-10255.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 20, 2009.
    
    Filed Aug. 31, 2009.
    Roger Dokken, Assistant U.S., USPX-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Brian Russo, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Fermín Hawee appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to assaulting a federal officer in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111.

Hawee contends that the district court erred in treating the sentencing Guidelines as mandatory, and its application of U.S.S.G. § 3A1.2(c)(l) constituted impermissible double-counting.

As part of his written plea, Hawee waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Hawee makes no argument that his plea agreement and appeal waiver were invalid. The district court’s plea colloquy confirms that Hawee knowingly and voluntarily waived the right to appeal. Accordingly, we enforce the appeal waiver. See United States v. Bibler, 495 F.3d 621, 624 (9th Cir.2007).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.