Case ID: so2d_297/html/0103-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HUDSON PULP & PAPER CORP., Appellant, v. BUTLER & COMPANY and Calvert Fire Insurance Company, Appellees. HUDSON PULP & PAPER CORP., Appellant, v. V. M. BOLTON, Individually and for the Use and Benefit of Northland Insurance Company, Appellees. HUDSON PULP & PAPER CORP., Appellant, v. VERNON MILLING COMPANY and Calvert Fire Insurance Company, Appellees. HUDSON PULP & PAPER CORP., Appellant, v. BUTLER & COMPANY, INC., in its own right and for the Use and Benefit of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Appellees.
    Nos. U-179 to U-182.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 6, 1974.
    Rehearing Denied July 22, 1974.
    
      Ford L. Thompson of Thompson, Wads-worth & Messer, Tallahassee, for appellant.
    William D. Reynolds, Gainesville, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an adverse final judgment rendered in favor of appel-lee. The principal question preserved on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment.

In our review of the record we have given due consideration to the applicable appellate principle that a judgment of the trial court reaches the appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness. Our review of the record reveals that although the testimony is conflicting, there is substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict and judgment thereon. It is not the province of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the trier of the facts. These findings will not be disturbed in the absence of a clear showing that the trial court committed error or that the evidence demonstrates that the conclusions reached are erroneous. The judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur. 
      
      . Stoller v. Jaffe, 125 So.2d 310 (Fla.App.1961); Old Equity Life Insurance Company v. Levenson, 177 So.2d 50 (Fla.App.1965).