Case ID: ad_139/html/0940-08.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles G. Willoughby, Respondent, v. Dana A. Patten, Appellant.
   Orders of the County Court of Kings county reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that they are.improperly based in part upon conduct during examination subsequent to the motion, that such conduct does not justify the. punishment, and that the evidence that the creditor’s rights and remedies were prejudiced does not warrant the fine imposed. Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Burr and Thomas, JJ., concurred.