Case ID: ad2d_277/html/0379-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Rosella G., Appellant, v Eileen B. et al., Respondents.
    [715 NYS2d 756]
   —In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Pessala, J.), dated May 27, 1998, which, after a hearing, denied her petition seeking custody of or visitation with her great-grandchild.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking custody of or visitation with her great-grandchild. The respondents are the child’s parents. We affirm the denial of the petition.

A parent may not be deprived of custody of a child absent a showing of “surrender, abandonment, persisting neglect, unfitness or other like extraordinary circumstances” (Matter of Bennett v Jeffreys, 40 NY2d 543, 544; see also, Matter of Male Infant L., 61 NY2d 420, 427; Matter of Tyrique P., 216 AD2d 387). Here, the petitioner failed to demonstrate such extraordinary circumstances (see, Matter of McGraw v McGraw, 258 AD2d 464; Matter of Tyrique P., supra).

Moreover, the petitioner, as a great-grandparent of the child, lacks standing to seek visitation (see, Family Ct Act § 651; Domestic Relations Law § 72; People ex rel. Antonini v Tracey L., 230 AD2d 869).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.