Case ID: ohio-st-3d_71/html/0256-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Toledo Bar Association v. Carrigan.
    [Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Carrigan (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 256.]
    (No. 93-2536
    Submitted November 2, 1994
    Decided December 20, 1994.)
    
      
      George Gemot III and David F. Cooper, for relator.
    
      
      William, M. Connelly and Steven R. Smith, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Based upon our review, the findings and recommendations of the board are affirmed. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded and costs are taxed to him.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, J., dissents and would dismiss the cause.