Case ID: mo_28/html/0598-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Napton, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gillespie, Respondent, v. Gillespie, Appellant.
    1. Judgment affirmed.
    
      Appeal from Dade Circuit Court.
    
    
      Wilkes, Crawford, McDowell and Stemmons, for appellant.
    
      Coffee and Ewing, for respondent.
   Napton, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The testimony upon which the decree in this case was based is not of such a nature as to authorize, in our view of it, any interference on the part of this court. No point of law is presented by the record. A review of the evidence could lead to the settlement of no principle or precedent; it is very contradictory, and the circuit court, before whom the witnesses appeared, being satisfied, we do not feel ourselves competent to interfere.

Judgment -affirmed.

The other judges concur.