Case ID: f-appx_367/html/0471-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronald S. SNIPE, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Wayne PHILLIPS, Respondent—Appellee.
    No. 09-6235.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 18, 2010.
    Decided: Feb. 23, 2010.
    Ronald S. Snipe, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald S. Snipe, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting in part and rejecting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Snipe v. Phillips, No. 3:08-cv-00022-JPB-JSK, 2008 WL 5412868 (N.D.W.Va. Dec. 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.