Case ID: ny-2d_69/html/0801-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lovisa Construction Co., Inc., Respondent, v City of New York, Appellant, and Morse Diesel, Inc., et al., Respondents.
    Argued January 14, 1987;
    decided February 12, 1987
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (Barry P. Schwartz and Fay Leoussis of counsel), for appellant.
    
      Michael P. Goldsmith, Gary M. Axenfeld and Stephen M. Harnik for Lovisa Construction Co., Inc., respondent.
    
      Tony Berman for Sarcon Construction Corp., respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division in Naclerio Contr. Co. v City of New York (116 AD2d 463, affd 69 NY2d 794 [decided herewith]) and the question certified answered in the affirmative.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.