Case ID: or_19/html/0397-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[Filed June 21, 1890.]
    A. E. EATON, Respondent, v. THE OREGON RAILWAY & NAVIGATION COMPANY, Appellant.
    Appeal from Union county: Jas. A. Fee, judge.
    
      W. W. Cotton and Gilbert & Snow, for Appellant.
    
      E. Ealaitn and T. H. Crawford, for Respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The points raised and decided in the preceding cases—Eaton v. O. R’y & N. Co., ante, p. 391—render it unnecessary to consider the main questions suggested by this record. In the views there expressed the instructions were not prejudicial, and the judgment must be affirmed.