Case ID: fla_148/html/0293-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Abe Gilbert and Edith Hoppel v. State of Florida.
    4 So. (2nd) 330
    Division A
    Opinion Filed October 21, 1941
    
      J. F. Gordon and Burnett Both for Appellants;
    
      Robert R. Taylor and Thos. H. Anderson, for Appellee.
   Per Curiam.

Appeal brings for review judgments of conviction of the offense of unlawfully living in an open state of adultery.

The sole challenge is to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment.

The record discloses no motion for new trial. Therefore, review of error predicated on insufficiency of evidence is not available. See Schmids v. Tampa Pub. Co., 72 Fla. 571, 73 Sou. 593; St. Andrews Bay Lbr. Co. v. Bernard, 106 Fla. 232, 143 Sou. 159; Davis v. State, 47 Fla. 26, 36 Sou. 170; Florida Power Co. v. Cason, 79 Fla. 619, 84 Sou. 921; Osceola Fertilizer Co. v. Beville, 86 Fla. 479, 98 Sou. 354; 356, citing Greenblatt v. Bissell Dry Goods Co., 85 Fla. 83, 95 Sou. 302; Johnson v. State, 53 Fla. 42, 43 Sou. 430; Thomas Bros. Co. v. Price, 56 Fla. 854, 48 Sou. 262.

No reversible error appearing from the record, the judgments are affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Buford and Adams, J. J., concur.