Case ID: sw2d_926/html/0684-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Patricia A. PRIESTER, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Scott G. PRIESTER, Respondent/Appellant.
    No. 68676.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    June 25, 1996.
    
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 15, 1996.
    James L. Rohlfing, Brassil & Rohlfing, P.C., St. Louis, for appellant.
    Sally Austin Mills, Colleen M. Hubble, Hayes, Heisler, Mills & Wynne, Clayton, for respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals from the circuit court’s order modifying a decree of dissolution. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).