Case ID: nys_18/html/0953-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nordlinger, Respondent, v. Levine, Appellant.
    
      (Common Pleas of New York City and County,
    
    
      General Term.
    
    March 7, 1892.)
    Motion by defendant for reargument. Denied.
    For decision on appeal, see 16 R. Y. Supp. 955, mem.
    
    Argued before Bookstaver, Bischoff, and Pryor, JJ.
    
      Goodhart & Phillips, for the motion. Guggenheimer & XJntermyer, opposed.
   Per Curiam.

The application is too late. By the settled practice of the ■court a motion for a reargument will not be entertained unless presented, at ■furthest, to the term next succeeding that at which the appeal was decided. Independently, however, of this formal objection, the motion is without merit. Reargument denied, with costs.