Case ID: sd_39/html/0513-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "WHITING, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE, Appellant, v. SCHAMBER et al., Respondents.
    (165 N. W. 248.)
    (File No. 4093.
    Opinion filed December 4, 1917.)
    Appeal from Circuit Court, Beadle County. Hon. Alva E. Taylor, Judge.
    Action by the State, against John Schamber and others. Erom an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, the state appeals.
    Reversed.
    Sec. State v. S'chamber et al., 39 S. D. 492.
    
      Clarence C. Caldwell, Attorney General, and Byron S. Payne, Assistant Attorney General (Bdiocurd B. Wagner of counsel), for the State.
    
      Buell & Denu, Gardner & Churchill, Spangler &• Haney, and Wicks & Quinn, for Respondents.
   WHITING, J.

The question presented upon this appeal is! the same as that presented in State v. Schamber, Dubs, et. al., 165 N. W. 241, this being an appeal from 'an order sustaining a demurrer to a complaint wherein the state claims the right to recover interest received by the defendant Schmaber upon funds-of the state deposited by said Schamber in various banks during his -term -of office as state treasurer, which, term succeeded the one referred to in the complaint in State v. Schamber, Dubs, et al. For all the reasons set forth in -our decision in State v. Schamber, Dubs, et al., the order appealed from herein is reversed.

P’OEDEY, J., dissents.