Case ID: sw3d_179/html/0306-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ernest WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 85674.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Nov. 29, 2005.
    Michelle M. Rivera, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jáy) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Evan'J. Buchhieim, Victor J. Melenbrink, Jefferson City, MÓ, for respondent.
    Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ernest Williams (Williams) appeals the trial court’s judgment, which denied his Rule '29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The trial court properly found that Williams was not entitled to relief under Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the Record on Appeal, and we find no error of law in this case. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).