Case ID: or-app_70/html/0725-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted November 5,
    reversed November 14,1984
    In the Matter of the Marriage of CONDON, Respondent, and CONDON, Appellant.
    
    (81-1869-E; CA A31569)
    690 P2d 1121
    Donald H. Coulter, Grants Pass, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Myrick, Coulter, Sea-graves, Myrick & Adams, Grants Pass.
    Walter L. Cauble, Grants Pass, waived appearance for respondent.
    Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

The trial court’s holding that defendant was in indirect contempt is not supported by adequate findings. See State ex rel v. Bassett, 166 Or 628, 113 P2d 432, 114 P2d 546 (1941); State ex rel Hiers v. Strain, 56 Or App 402, 642 P2d 315 (1982).

Reversed. Costs to appellant.