Case ID: sw2d_835/html/0539-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kevin M. DWYER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 60911.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    July 21, 1992.
    David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert Alan Kelly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Kevin M. Dwyer, appeals the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County. We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, the transcript and the legal file, and can find no clear error by the motion court. As we further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the motion court’s ruling pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties involved have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, explaining the reasons for our decision.