Case ID: ala-app_21/html/0660-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BRICKEN, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(109 So. 923)
    Louis BELL v. STATE.
    (8 Div. 409.)
    (Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    June 15, 1926.
    Rehearing Denied June 29, 1926.)
    Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County. W. W. Haralson, Judge.
    O. M. Raines, of Scottsboro, for appellant. Harwell G.' Davis, Atty. Gen., and Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Bell v. State, 109 So. 921.
   BRICKEN, P. J.

By a general verdict of guilty as charged in the indictment the defendant was convicted and duly sentenced. The indictment contained two counts, distilling prohibited liquors, and possessing a still, etc., to be used for that purpose. The evidence was in conflict. It was amply sufficient to warrant the jury in returning a verdict of conviction, and to sustain the judgment pronounced and entered. The evidence also tended to show the flight of defendant; this, with his explanations and denials, were questions of fact for the jury. It so clearly appears that there was no error in any of the rulings of the court upon the trial of this case we refrain from a discussion of the points involved upon this appeal. The judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken is affirmed. Affirmed.