Case ID: ohio-st_174/html/0273-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State, ex rel. Nadlin, v. Somers et al., City Commission of Dayton.
    (No. 37599
    Decided March 13, 1963.)
    
      
      Mr. Emanuel Nadlin, in propria persona.
    
    
      Mr. Herbert 8. Becme, city attorney, and Mr. Maurice J. Gilbert, for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The petition does not set forth facts indicating that respondents are required to perform any specific duty imposed upon them by law and therefore does not state a cause of action in mandamus. Relator’s motion is overruled, respondents’ motion to dismiss is sustained, and judgment denying the writ is rendered accordingly.

Writ denied.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.