Case ID: f-appx_325/html/0158-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Calvin MCCROREY, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 09-6239.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 23, 2009.
    Decided: May 5, 2009.
    Calvin McCrorey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Calvin McCrorey, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. McCrorey, No. 0:98-cr-01186-JFA-11 (D.S.C. Jan. 28, 2009) (noting that MeCrorey’s Sentencing Guidelines range remained unchanged after Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines because his statutory maximum sentence was below his guidelines sentencing range). See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5Gl.l(a) (2008) (noting that where statutorily authorized maximum sentence is less than the minimum of the applicable guidelines range, the maximum sentence shall be the guidelines range). We dispense with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately addressed in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.