Case ID: so3d_81/html/0613-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Juan FEBRES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D10-372.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 7, 2012.
    Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and, Douglas J. Glaid, Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before WELLS, C.J., and FERNANDEZ, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WELLS, C.J., and FERNANDEZ, J., concur.

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge

(dissenting).

In my view, the confession which was the most significant aspect of the prosecution’s case, should have been suppressed as the product of an unlawful, non-consensual confinement, that is, an arrest, which was not supported by probable cause. See Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 95 S.Ct. 2254, 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 103 S.Ct. 1319, 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983), affirming Royer v. State, 389 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Ladson v. State, 63 So.3d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (Schwartz, Senior J. dissenting); B.S. v. State, 548 So.2d 838 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Taylor v. State, 355 So.2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).