Case ID: ad2d_6/html/1029-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

C. Gerard Dodge, Respondent, v. Frederick W. Richmond, Appellant.
   — Order denying motion by defendant to amend his answer to include an affirmative defense of illegality is reversed in the exercise of discretion, and the motion is granted, without costs, on condition (1) that defendant serves his amended answer within five days after the entry of an order herein; (2) that service of the amended answer shall be without prejudice to all prior proceedings in the action and shall not delay the trial of the action when reached on the calendar; and (3) that defendant withdraws his motion to strike the cause from the trial calendar. Any examination as to the new defense should be conducted in connection with the examination of plaintiff before trial now being held. If defendant does not comply with the conditions above set forth, the order denying the motion- to amend is affirmed, with costs to respondent. Defendant shall signify his willingness to conform to the conditions upon settlement of the order hereon. Since parties should be permitted to amend their pleadings at any stage of an action if no prejudice will result to the other side, amendment herein should have been allowed upon conditions which would remove the probability of prejudice to plaintiff. The conditions imposed will, we believe, eliminate any reasonable claim of prejudice. Settle order. Concur — Rabin, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.