Case ID: so3d_230/html/1279-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nathan Lee GARROW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-242
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Opinion filed December 8, 2017
    
      James S. Purdy, ■ Public Defender, and David M. Dixon, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.
   PER CURIAM.

•'Nathan Garrow (the defendant) appeals his judgment and sentences entered by the trial court after a jury found him guilty of operating a chop shop, conspiracy to commit dealing in stolen property, and four counts of dealing in stolen property.-Finding no merit in the claims of error raised on appeal, we affirm. However, a scrivener’s error appears on the last page of the defendant’s sentencing' documents where the following paragraph appears:

In imposing the above sentence, the court further recommends; CT 1, & 3 YEARS-DOC F/B 2 YEARS COMMUNITY CONTROL-CTS ‘ 2,7,8,13 3 YEARS DOC F/B 2 YEARS COMMUNITY CONTROL FOLLOWED BY 5 YEARS OF PROBATION.

The paragraph should read: “CTS 1 & 4 3 YEARS.... ” Accordingly, we remand for correction of the defendant’s sentencing documents.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED TO CORRECT SCRIVENER’S ERROR.

SAWAYA, PALMER and'TORPY, JJ., concur.