Case ID: f-appx_37/html/0331-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re: BORTIS CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, Debtor. Moise Bortis; Marius Bortis, d/b/a Bortis Construction & Development, Appellants, v. Michael J. Garrison, Appellee.
    No. 01-35576.
    BAP No. WW-98-1525-PMcMe.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 10, 2002.
    
    Decided June 17, 2002.
    Before O’SCANNLAIN, BERZON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      
         The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument and denies appellants’ request for oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Moise Bortis and Marius Bortis appeal pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) order denying as untimely their motion to reopen the time to appeal filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We conclude that the BAP properly denied the Rule 4(a)(6) motion as untimely. See Mitchell v. Burt Vetterlein & Bushnell PC (In re Stein), 197 F.3d 421, 425 (9th Cir.1999).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.