Case ID: so2d_630/html/0578-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gregory J. TRIGG, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 81578.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Jan. 20, 1994.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Stephen Krosschell and Jennifer Fogle, Asst. Public Defenders, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, for petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Stephen A. Baker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We accepted jurisdiction of Trigg v. State, 614 So.2d 1223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), based upon a conflict of decisions. These conflicts have now been resolved by opinions of this Court which are consistent with the opinion below. Therefore, the petition for review is discharged.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.