Case ID: sw3d_122/html/0645-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alonzo PATTERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 82411.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Oct. 28, 2003.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 24, 2003.
    Gwenda R. Robinson, District Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Charnette D. Douglass, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. and MARY R. RUSSELL, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alonzo Patterson (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends the motion court erred in denying his postconviction motion because trial counsel was ineffective in failing (1) to call an alibi witness and (2) to contact, subpoena, and call the alibi witness. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).