Case ID: f-appx_250/html/0793-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Margaret Elizabeth BRODERICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Peter D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney General; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 07-55918.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 1, 2007 .
    Filed Oct. 10, 2007.
    Margaret Elizabeth Broderick, Fort Worth, TX, pro se.
    U.S. Attorney, USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney Civil & Tax Divisions, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: B. FLETCHER, BERZON and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       Peter D. Keisler is substituted for his predecessor, Alberto R. Gonzales, as Acting Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).
    
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Upon review of the record and appellant’s opening brief, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court’s order denying appellant’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief. See United States v. Hooton, 698 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record); see also Gregorio T. v. Wilson, 59 F.3d 1002, 1004-05 (9th Cir.1995) (denial of preliminary injunctive relief reviewed for abuse of discretion).

AFFIRMED. 
      
      
         This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.