Case ID: sd_10/html/0036-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Haney, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bourne v. Johnson et al.
    
    1. Where, after the evidence has been submitted, and plaintiff has moved for direction of a verdict, the case is continued for argument, a refusal on such argument to allow defendant to introduce further evidence was in the discretion of the court.
    2. Where, after judgment rendered, an order denying a new trial was entered, and was not appealed from, the sufficiency of the evidence to justify the judgment cannot be reviewed.
    (Opinion filed May 12, 1897.)
    Appeal from circuit court, Spink county. Hon. A. W. Campbell, Judge. *
    Action for damages. Plaintiff had judgment, Epid defendant appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      The-facts are stated in the opinion.
    
      JSF. P. Bromley, for appellants.
    
      H. G. Walsh and G. T. Eoioard, for respondent.
   Haney, J.