Case ID: so2d_609/html/0161-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HIALEAH, INC., Appellant, v. OCALA BREEDERS’ SALES CO., Appellee.
    No. 91-2346.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 8, 1992.
    Ruden, Barnett, McClosky, Smith, Schus-ter & Russell, Gregory P. Borgognoni and Kenneth S. Klein, Miami, for appellant.
    Holland & Knight, Daniel S. Pearson, William F. Hamilton, and Lucinda A. Hof-mann, Miami, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Because the recent decision in Exceletech, Inc. v. Williams, 597 So.2d 275 (Fla.1992) renders any procedural error harmless, see § 59.041, Fla.Stat. (1991), and the nunc pro tunc order permissible, the order below is

Affirmed.