Case ID: pa_623/html/0251-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

82 A.3d 942
    Mary DANIEL and Thomas Daniel, Sr., Appellees v. WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst International, Inc., Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Division of Wyeth, Division of American Home Products Corp., Wyeth Inc., a/k/a American Home Products Corp., Appellants. Mary Daniel and Thomas Daniel, Sr., Appellees v. Wyeth, Inc., Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Wyeth-Ayerst International, Inc., Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Division of Wyeth, Appellants.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Argued Sept. 11, 2012.
    Decided Dec. 16, 2013.
    
      Sheila L. Birnbaum, Robert C. Heim, Judy L. Leone, Dechert LLP, Philadelphia, for Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.
    Lindsay Dobrzynski Breedlove, Neal Kumar Katyal, Melissa B. Kimmel, Mit Spears, for Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Appellant Amicus Curiae.
    Robert Brian Murphy, for the Product Liability Advisory Council, Appellant Amicus Curiae.
    Samuel Abloeser, Philadelphia, Howard Jonathan Bashman, Esther Berezofsky, Mark R. Cuker, Philadelphia, William Cuker Berezofsky, Michael J. Quirk, Philadelphia, for Daniel, Mary and Thomas, Sr.
    Andre Mura, George Gerasimos Rassias, Schmidt, Kirifides & Fridkin, for Pennsylvania Association for Justice, Appellee Amicus Curiae.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of December, 2013, the appeals are dismissed as having been improvidently granted.