Case ID: nys_127/html/1115-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BURKE, Appellant, v. WESTPHAL, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    February 17, 1911.)
    Action by Joseph Burke against Louis Westphal.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs, on the ground that it appears by the testimony of plaintiff that he had executed an assignment of the claim constituting the cause of action, and there was no proof of any reassignment thereof to him. See, also, 131 App. Div. 910, 115 N. Y. Supp. 1114.