Case ID: nj-eq_81/html/0519-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The Rubber and Celluloid Harness Trimming Company, appellee, v. The Rubber-Bound Brush Company et al., appellants.
    [Submitted March 24th, 1913.
    Decided May 9th, 1913.]
    On apneal from a decree of the court of chancery advised bjr Vice-Chancellor Howell, whose opinion is reported ante p. kl9.
    
    
      Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Skinner, for the appellee.
    
      Messrs. King & Vogt, for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chan-' cellor Howell.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, White, Heppenheimer, Terhune — 13.

For reversal — None.