Case ID: ohio-st-3d_32/html/0379-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Holmes, J,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Zuranski, Appellant.
    [Cite as State v. Zuranski (1987), 32 Ohio St. 3d 379.]
    (No. 87-232
    Decided September 16, 1987.)
    
      John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, and Ann T. Mannen, for ap-pellee.
    
      Hyman Friedman, county public defender, and Patricia Walsh, for appellant.
   This cause (court of appeals No. 50447) is allowed as to Proposition of Law No. XV only, and as so allowed is reversed on authority of State v. Penix (1987), 32 Ohio St. 3d 369, 513 N.E. 2d 744, and remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accordance with that decision.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Holmes, J., dissents.

Holmes, J,

dissenting. I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in State v. Penix (1987), 32 Ohio St. 3d 369, 513 N.E. 2d 744.