Case ID: nj-misc_13/html/0525-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

EDWARD O’NEILL, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. FRANK BREIDT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Argued May 9, 1935
    Decided May 9, 1935.
    Before Chief Justice Brogan, and Justices Lloyd and Donges.
    Por the appellants, Benjamin Gordon and Earl A. Merrill.
    
    Por the respondent, Connolly & Hueston.
    
   Per Curiam.

The proofs have been examined and from the evidence we can find no proof whatever of negligence on the part of the defendant.

The judgment is affirmed.