Case ID: sw2d_896/html/0679-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re MARRIAGE OF Linda S. KAHN and Farrell Kahn. Linda S. KAHN, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Farrell KAHN, Respondent/Appellant.
    No. 66001.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    March 28, 1995.
    Rehearing Denied April 26, 1995.
    John A, Klobasa, Alan C. Kohn, Kohn, Shands, Elbert, Gianoulakis & Giljum, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Thomas P. Rosenfeld, Stone, Leyton & Gershman, Clayton, for respondent.
    Before CRANE, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from a judgment entered after remand in Kahn v. Kahn, 846 S.W.2d 219 (Mo.App.1993). The trial court ordered husband to pay wife $122,015.88 in attorney’s fees incurred by wife as a defendant in a Kentucky lawsuit.

The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).