Case ID: cal-app_38/html/0783-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "LENNON, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[Civ. No. 2606.
    First Appellate Division.
    September 27, 1918.]
    MARY V. COWARD, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. AGNES DE CRAY, as Executrix, etc., et al., Defendants and Respondents; CATHERINE L. CODY et al., Defendants and Appellants.
    Gift—Indorsement of Stock Certificates—Delivery to Third Person for Indorsee—Retaking by Donor Ineffective—Evidence— Delivery and Recording of Other Instruments Executed by Donor.—Judgment affirmed pursuant to stipulation on the authority of Coward v. Ve Cray et ál., ante, p. 290.
    APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County; Benj. K. Knight, Judge.
    The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
    R. H. Smith and Emmet C. Rittenhouse, for Appellants.
    Wyckoff & Gardner and Chas. B. Younger, for Respondents.
   LENNON, P. J.

In this case it has been stipulated by the parties, and in accordance therewith, ordered by the court, that the appeal should be submitted to the court for decision upon the briefs and transcript filed and arguments made in an appeal involving the same parties and the same questions, numbered 2530 and entitled, Mary V. Coward, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Agnes De Cray, as Executrix, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants; Catherine L. Cody et al., Defendants and Respondents.

A decision in the above-entitled appeal, No. 2530, has this day been rendered and filed (ante, p. 290, [176 Pac. 56]), and for the reasons given therein, and in accordance with the stipulation and order filed herein, the judgment herein is affirmed.

Sturtevant, J., pro tern., and Beasly, J., pro tern,., concurred.