Case ID: f-appx_13/html/0503-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David ADKINS, Plaintiff, and Bernardo Alvarez; Raul Alvarez; Daniel Atencio; Robert Auxier; Ernesto Barraza; James Bentson; Daniel Black; Virginia Brandon; Leamon Bryant; Armando Bustamente, Jr.; Edward Cesena, Jr.; Arthur Cena; Callen Campbell; Lila Diaz; Dorene Doric; Jeff Dunne; Jose Espinoza; Andrew Finley; Michael Fornaseri; Daniel Gallegos; David Garcia; Darvey Guidry; Martin Gonzalez; Fernando Gonzalez; Richard Heitzwebel; Charles Hearn; Rosemary Jaime; Patrick King; Kenneth Lammon; Jackie Lopez; Cecilia Lozano; Barbara Lute; Francisco Marin; Raul Mata; Katharine Miranda; Peter Miller; Linda Morales; William Mueller, Jr.; Matthew Montgomery, Jr.; Earl Pedford; Victor Paz; Jose Perez; Sefo Purcell; Martin Ramos; Leo Ruiz; Michael Rodriguez; Marie Riley; Blaine Roskelley; Ritch Smith; Samuel Saldana; Richard Sarmast; Thomas Servia; Martin Sepulveda; Kathy Seward; Richard Sherman; Rita Slagle; Julie Toone; Hiram Travis; John Vandyken; Jose Vargas; Ted Wightman; Darryl Williams; Gerald Wildermuth; Albert Zamora, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LUCKY STORES, INC., a California corporation and division of American Stores Company; American Stores Company, a corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
    Nos. 00-55045, 00-55388.
    D.C. No. CV-99-09406-GAF.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 4, 2001.
    
    Decided June 13, 2001.
    Before D.W. NELSON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Plaintiffs-appellants, former employees of Lucky/American Stores’ Fullerton warehouse, appeal from (1) the denial of their motion to file a second amended complaint; (2) summary judgment in favor of the defendants; and (3) the award of attorney’s fees to the defendants. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its orders of October 27, 1999, November 9, 1999, and January 24, 2000, respectively.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts in this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.