Case ID: ny-super-ct_59/html/0588-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frederick Storck, Respondent v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, et al., Appellants.
    Decided May 4, 1891.
    Appeal by defendants from judgment entered upon findings and conclusions at special term.
    Julien T. Davies and Brainard Tolles, for appellants.
    Sackett & Bennett, attorneys, and Charles Gibson Bennett of counsel, for respondent.
    Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Dugro, J.
   The question involved was as to the sufficiency of the evidence to require the" trial judge to find certain requests. The Court (per Curiam) held it insufficient and affirmed the judgment, with costs..