Case ID: ohio-st-3d_57/html/0043-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n     Wright, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cincinnati Bar Association v. Lange.
    [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Lange (1991), 57 Ohio St. 3d 43.]
    (No. 90-884
    Submitted October 16, 1990
    Decided January 9, 1991.)
    
      
      W. Deems Clifton II, Donald E. Schneider and Harold M. Schwartz, for relator.
    
      James N. Perry, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Upon a careful review of the record, we agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 1-102(A)(4) and 7-102(A)(5). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.

Wright, J.,

dissenting. I would order a sanction of a six-month suspension against respondent.

Moyer, C.J., and Holmes, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.