Case ID: ny-2d_72/html/0852-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Philip Tardbania, Appellant.
    Argued May 24, 1988;
    decided June 30, 1988
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Raymond, A. Meier for appellant.
    
      Barry M. Donalty, District Attorney (William M. Weber of counsel), for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The remarks made by the prosecutor on summation do not require reversal. In some instances where the defendant objected, the objection was sustained and adequate curative instructions were given and in other instances no objection was taken. Therefore, no issue has been preserved for review by this court (CPL 470.05 [2]).

We have not passed on the double jeopardy issue decided by the Appellate Division because the defendant has not argued the point on this appeal.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.