Case ID: f2d_439/html/0155-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Odell ANDREWS and Willie Sloan, Appellants.
    No. 26567.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    April 13, 1971.
    Burton Marks, of Marks, Sherman & London, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellant.
    Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., David R. Nissen, Chief, Crim. Div., Brain J. O’Neill, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
    Before CHAMBERS, HUFSTEDLER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction after remand, 426 F.2d 1304, of this judge-tried case is affirmed.-

We hold it was not necessary to have a whole new trial or to let defendant have a second chance with a jury instead of a judge.

A close parallel is found in the case of Campbell v. United States, 365 U.S. 85, 81 S.Ct. 421, 5 L.Ed.2d 428.