Case ID: f-appx_51/html/0461-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Calvin Angelo COWARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. D. Scott DODRILL, Warden; UNITED STATES of America, Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 02-7216.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 31, 2002.
    Decided Dec. 3, 2002.
    Calvin Angelo Coward, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Fenita Morris Shepard, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before WILLIAM D. WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Calvin Coward, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), and the district court’s order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 59(e) motion to amend. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Coward v. Dodrill, No. CA-01-398-5-HO (E.D.N.C. May 31, & July 5, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.