Case ID: njl_74/html/0685-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOSEPH WALTER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. WESTINGHOUSE, CHURCH, KERR & COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.
    Argued December 3, 1906 —
    Decided March 26, 1907.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    Eor the plaintiffs in error, Leivis, Besson & Bievens.
    
    Eor the defendant in error, Raymond & Van Blarcom.
    
   Per Curiam.

The court being equally divided, the judgment below is affirmed.

For ■ affirmance — Garrison, Port, Pitney, Swayze, .Vroom, Green, Gray, J.J. 7.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Garretson, Hendrickson, Reed, Trenchard, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, J.J. 7.