Case ID: so2d_185/html/0170-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harold F. PEARSON, Petitioner, v. STERCHI BROTHERS STORES, INC., and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents. STERCHI BROTHERS STORES, INC. and Florida Industrial Commission, Cross-Petitioner, v. Harold F. PEARSON, Cross-Respondent.
    No. 34521.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    April 12, 1966.
    Monroe E. McDonald, of Sanders, McEwan, Schwarz & Mims and Edward H. Hurt, Orlando, for .petitioner and cross-respondent.
    John M. Cain, of Frederick, Cain & Duckworth,’ Orlando, for respondent and cross-petitioner.
    Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and briefs and have heard argument by the parties. We find that in entering the order under attack the respondent-commission did not depart from the essential requirements of law. Accordingly, the petition and the cross-petition for writ of certiorari are both denied. The petition for attorneys’ fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., and WARREN, Circuit Judge, concur.