Case ID: f2d_850/html/1086-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William S. SMITH, Jr., and Marion R. Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COOPER/T. SMITH CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 87-3247.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Aug. 1, 1988.
    Stone, Pigman, Walther, Wittmann & Hutchinson, Gregory F. Gambel, Karen L. Sonnier, New Orleans, La., William H. Jef-fress, Jr., J.R. Caldwell, Jr., Mary L. Lyons, Miller, Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs-appellants.
    Harry A. Rosenberg, Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie & Sims, New Orleans, La., Armbrecht, Jackson, Demouy, Crowe, Holmes & Reeves, Norman E. Waldrop, Jr., Mobile, Ala., for Cooper/T. Smith Corp.
    John M. McCollam, Ewell E. Eagan, Gordon, Arata, McCollam & Duplantis, New Orleans, La., Bernard J. Rothbaum, Jr., James P. Linn, Linn & Helms, Oklahoma City, Okl., for Moffett, Amato & Merrigan.
    Harvey C. Koch, Howard Marks, New Orleans, La., for James E. Smith, Sr.
   ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion June 7, 1988, 5 Cir., 1988, 846 F.2d 325)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAYLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court m active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed.