Case ID: f-appx_376/html/0923-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAMt:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angel HARO-PEREZ, a.k.a. UM-23, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-14946
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    April 27, 2010.
    Thomas C. Wooldridge, Wooldridge & Jezek, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Elizabeth M. Hathaway, Jenny R. Turner, John Andrew Horn, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    
      Before PRYOR, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAMt:

Thomas C. Wooldridge, appointed appellate counsel for Angel Haro-Perez, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Haro-Perez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.