Case ID: ny_176/html/0556-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Melle S. T. Werner, Respondent, v. William R. Hearst, Appellant. (Actions 1 and 2.)
    Reported below, 76 App. Div. 375.
    (Argued October 5, 1903;
    decided October 13, 1903.)
    Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 16, 1903, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
    The motion was made upon the ground that the only questions of law involved which the Court of' Appeals had jurisdiction to consider had become abstract.
    
      lioger M. Sherman for motion.
    
      David B. Hill opposed.
   Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.