Case ID: f-appx_63/html/0987-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose COLIN-CORREA, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 01-10327.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 10, 2003.
    
    Decided May 21, 2003.
    Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jose Colin-Correa appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 33-month sentence for harboring illegal aliens and engaging in a related monetary transaction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) and 18 U.S.C. § 1957. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Colin-Correa’s counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, and requesting to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our examination of the briefs and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no arguable issues for review on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and, in light of the appeal waiver, the appeal is DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.