Case ID: f-cas_7/html/1108-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "THE COURT.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Case No. 4,092a.
    DROPE v. MILLER.
    [Hempst. 49.] 
    
    Superior Court, Territory of Arkansas.
    April, 1827.
    Equity—Issue for Juki.
    Issue directed out of chancery to ascertain whether a partnership, asserted by complainant and denied by defendant, was formed as alleged.
    (This was a bill in equity by William Drope against John MillerJ Order to try disputed facts.
    Before JOHNSON and ESKRIDGE, Juag-as.
   OPINION OE

THE COURT.

In this case it is alleged by the complainant that he formed a partnership in trade with the defendant, in April, 1S10, which fact is denied by the defendant. It is, therefore, ordered that a jury come at the next term on the law side of this court to ascertain by their verdict, whether there was or was not a partnership in trade formed by said Drope and Miller, in April, 1S10, and that the verdict of the jury be immediately certified to this court as a court in chancery.