Case ID: vt_100/html/0160-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Powers, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

State v. C. D. Williams.
    .October Term, 1926.
    Present: Watson, C. J., Powers, Slack, and Fish, JJ., and Moulton, Supr. 3.
    
    Opinion filed January 8, 1927.
    Information for violation of Motor Vehicles Act, by operation of an unregistered motor bus on highways of State. Heard on demurrer to complaint, by Hartford municipal court, A. G. Witham, Judge. Demurrer overruled and complaint adjudged sufficient. The respondent excepted.
    
      Affirmed and remanded.
    
    
      Raymond Trainor and Stanley C. Wilson for the respondent.
    
      J. Ward Carver, Attorney General, Robert R. Twitchell, State’s attorney, and George L. Hunt of counsel, for the State.
   Powers, J.

This respondent lives at Lebanon, N. H., and is charged with operating a certain motor truck for the regular delivery of goods, wares, and merchandise for more than thirty trips in the current year upon a certain highway in this State while such truck was duly registered in New Hampshire but not in Vermont. Under section 64 of the Motor Vehicles Act, No. 70, Acts of 1925, this respondent stands just as a nonresident bus owner does. So all the questions here involved are like those in State v. Captan, ante p. 140, 135 Atl. 705, and for the reasons therein given the entry in this case is:

Judgment affirmed and cause remanded.