Case ID: f-appx_127/html/0966-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Paul FEINER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 04-56082.
    D.C. No. CV-04-03390-CBM.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 23, 2005.
    
    Decided April 13, 2005.
    Paul Feiner, Valley Glen, CA, pro se.
    
      Before B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Paul Feiner appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his application to proceed in forma pauperis. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion. O’Loughlin v. Doe, 920 F.2d 614, 616 (9th Cir.1990). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Feiner leave to file in forma pauperis because Feiner’s action is frivolous. See id. at 617 (holding that in forma pauperis complaint may be dismissed as frivolous when it contains no arguable basis in law or fact).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.