Case ID: f-appx_37/html/0916-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ambrocio HUBER-CARLON; et al., Petitioners, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 00-70395.
    INS Nos. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ] [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 10, 2002 .
    Decided June 18, 2002.
    Before O’SCANNLAIN, BERZON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       John Ashcroft is substituted for Janet Reno pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).
    
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Ambrocio Huber-Carlon and Maricela Hernandez-Nolasco, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal of the Immigration Judge’s order denying their application for cancellation of removal because they failed to demonstrate “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” to a qualifying relative under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(D).

We lack jurisdiction to review this petition. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002).

We deny as moot petitioners’ motion for stay of removal pending decision of this Court.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.