Case ID: f-appx_110/html/0365-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Karl G. BYRD, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The BALTIMORE SUN COMPANY; Baltimore Graphic Communications Union #31; Robert Stallings, President, Baltimore Graphic Communications Union # 31, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 03-2219.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 27, 2004.
    Decided Oct. 15, 2004.
    Ralph T. Byrd, Laytonsville, Maryland, for Appellant. Howard K. Kurman, Laura L. Hoppenstein, Offit, Kurman, Yumkas & Denick, P.A., Owings Mills, Maryland; Charles Lamasa, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    
      Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM.

Karl G. Byrd, Sr., appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in Byrd’s employment discrimination action and denying Byrd’s motion for a continuance and motion to strike materials submitted in support of summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Byrd v. Baltimore Sun Co., 279 F.Supp.2d 662 (D.Md.2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED