Case ID: f-appx_185/html/0679-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jeffrey RICKMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-30312.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted June 12, 2006.
    
    Decided June 19, 2006.
    Kurt Alme, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Michael Donahue, Federal Defenders of Montana, Helena, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: FERNANDEZ, KLEINFELD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jeffrey Rickman appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 42-month sentence for mail fraud and money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1957.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Rickman has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief was filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.