Case ID: ny_190/html/0509-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sarah Goldman, Respondent, v. Barnett B. Goldberg, Appellant.
    
      Goldman v. Goldberg, 113 App. Div. 912, affirmed.
    (Submitted October 24, 1907;
    decided November 19, 1907.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 15, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to compel specific performance of a contract to convey real estate.
    
      Nathan J). Stern and Edward Herrmarm for appellant.
    
      Arthur Hurst for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur : Cullen, Ch.'J., Gray, O’Brien, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.