Case ID: pa_214/html/0334-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Stewart,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bordentown Banking Company v. Sparhawk, Appellant
    (No. 2).
    Argued Jan. 12, 1906.
    Appeal, No. 232, Jan. T., 1905, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., March T., 1905, No. 4,247, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Bordentown Banking Company v. John Sparhawk, Jr.
    Before Mitchell, C. J., Fell, Brown, Mestrezat, Potter, Elkin and Stewart, JJ.
    Affirmed.
    March 12, 1906:
   Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stewart,

The cause of action here is the same as in Bordentown Banking Co. v. Restein, ante, p. 331, just decided, and the affidavit of defense is precisely the same. For reasons stated in that case, this judgment is affirmed.