Case ID: njl_67/html/0354-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. JUNIOR HATFIELD, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued November 20, 1901
    Decided March 3, 1902.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiff in error, Michael Dunn.
    
    For the state, Eugene Emley, prosecutor of the pleas.
   Per Curiam.

Two eases with the above title were argued together.

The judgment in each of them is affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court. 37 Vroom 443.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Van Syckel, Garretson, Fort, Garretson, Pitney, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom. 12.

For reversal — None.