Case ID: sw3d_484/html/0876-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dajuan BROWN, Appellant.
    No. ED 102868
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    
    Filed: March 22, 2016
    
      For Appellant: John K.. Tucci, 720 Olive Street, Suite 1600, St. Louis, Missouri, 63101.
    For Respondent: Chris Koster, Christine Lesicko, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102. > ■
    Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J.,- and James M; Dowd, J. •
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Dajuan Brown appeals his convictions following a jury trial in thé Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis of one count of first-degree robbery "and one count of armed criminal action. In his two points on appeal, Brown contends that the trial court erred (1) by admitting in- and out-of-court identifications of him the reliability of which was tainted by impermissibly suggestive pretrial identification procedures, and (2) by overruling his challenge under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), to the State’s peremptory strike of a potential juror. We affirm.

We .have concluded that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth , the reasons for , this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).