Case ID: nev_93/html/0063-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MOMENT LEA ARMOUR, Appellant, v. THOMAS D. ARMOUR, Respondent.
    No. 8502
    February 16, 1977
    [Rehearing denied June 9, 1977]
    560 P.2d 148
    
      Beckley, Singleton, DeLanoy, Jemison & Reid, Las Vegas, for Appellant.
    
      Peter L. Flangas, Las Vegas, for Respondent.
   OPINION

Per Curiam:

After the district court entered judgment dissolving the parties’ marriage and distributing the community property, Moment Lea Armour appealed complaining of her share of the property distribution.

After reviewing the record, we believe the distribution was equitable and perceive no abuse of discretion. NRS 125.150; Benavidez v. Benavidez, 92 Nev. 539, 554 P.2d 256 (1976); Jolley v. Jolley, 92 Nev. 298, 549 P.2d 1407 (1976); Todkill v. Todkill, 88 Nev. 231, 495 P.2d 629 (1972).

Affirmed.