Case ID: wash_139/html/0706-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam. Askren, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 20032.
    
      En Banc.
    
    July 14, 1926.]
    The State of Washington, on the Relation of W. A. Rupp, Relator, v. A. H. B. Jordan, Respondent.
      
    
    Information in,quo warranto filed in the supreme court May 10, 1926, to try title to an appointive state office.
    Writ denied.
    
      Wright, Fronde, Allen & Hilen, Preston, Thorgrimson & Turner, Chadwick, McMicken, Ramsey & Rupp, and Peters & Powell, for relator.
    
      The Attorney General, Hartman & Hartman, J. A. Coleman, Coleman & Fogarty, and Horan & Mulvihill, for respondent.
    
      
       Reported in 248 Pac. 432.
    
   Per Curiam.

This case, in all essential particulars, is similar to that of State ex rel. Davis v. Johns, ante p. 525, 248 Pac. 423. The two cases were argued together. For the reasons given in the opinion in the other ease, the writ applied for in this one will be denied.

Askren, J.

(dissenting)—I dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in State ex rel. Davis v. Johns, ante p. 525, 248 Pae. 423.

Bridges and Main, JJ., concur with Askren, J.