Case ID: so2d_520/html/0709-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert JAMES, Appellant, v. Frank PLANO d/b/a Gulfstream Masonry and Milord Development Corporation, Appellees. MILORD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Frank PLANO d/b/a Gulfstream Masonry and Robert James, Appellees.
    Nos. 4-86-2400, 4-86-2465.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    March 9, 1988.
    Russell S. Bohn, of Edna L. Caruso, P.A., and Law Offices of Phillip C. Houston, West Palm Beach, for Robert James.
    Charles R. Crispell and John J. Bulfin, of Wiederhold, Moses & Bulfin, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Milord Development.
    Richard H. Gaunt, Jr., of Cibula, Gaunt, Pratt & Radford, West Palm Beach, for Frank Plano.
   ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We deny the appellee’s motion for rehearing. However, we withdraw our opinion of December 16, 1987, and substitute the following revised opinion:

On the authority of Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966), we reverse the summary final judgment and the resulting cost judgment entered in favor of the appellee, Frank Plano d/b/a Gulfstream Masonry (Plano), against the appellant Robert James (James). A genuine issue of material fact remains as to whether the wall that collapsed resulting in injury to James was negligently constructed by Plano. For this reason, the summary final judgment entered against Milord Development Corporation on its cross claim for contribution and common law indemnity is also reversed.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.