Case ID: f2d_41/html/0523-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "COTTERAL, Circuit Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WILLIS v. SCOTT et al.
    No. 185.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
    June 11, 1930.
    For former opinion, see 40 F.(2d) 330.
    Guy H. Sigler and H. A. Ledbetter, both of Ardmore, Okl. (H. E. Ledbetter and P. M. Jackson, both of Ardmore, Okl., on the brief), for appellant.
    Philos S. Jones, of Muskogee, Okl. (Frank Lee, of Muskogee, Okl., on the brief), for appellees McMillan and Buddrus.
    F. M. Adams, of Ardmore, Okl. (Adams So Orr, of Ardmore, Okl., Marion W. Roily, of Meridian, Miss., and Earl Richardson, of Philadelphia, Miss., on the brief), for appellee Scott.
    W. F. Semple, of Durant, Okl. (A. H. Ferguson, of Durant, Okl., on the brief), for appellee Willis.
    Before COTTERAL, PHILLIPS, and MeDERMOTT, Circuit Judges.
   COTTERAL, Circuit Judge.

It is asserted in the petition for a rehearing that our opinion erroneously states Lilly Tubby and Feliah Jim Willis pleaded to the bill in the trial court. The record shows the only pleadings of these parties were their responses filed in the county court of Carter county. The correction is made. However, the interests of these parties were not involved, and our decision is in no wise affected by the fact.

We are not persuaded that there was error in our determination of this ease.

The petition for rehearing is therefore denied.