Case ID: f3d_677/html/0921-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rosalina CUELLAR DE OSORIO; Elizabeth Magpantay; Evelyn Y. Santos; Maria Eloisa Liwag; Norma Uy; Ruth Uy, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Alejandro MAYORKAS, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; Janet Napolitano, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State, Defendants-Appellees. Teresita G. Costelo; Lorenzo P. Ong, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Janet Napolitano, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; Alejandro Mayorkas, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; Lynne Skeirik, Director, National Visa Center; Christina Poulos, Acting Director, California Service Center, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State, Defendants-Appellees.
    Nos. 09-56786, 09-56846.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    April 20, 2012.
    Nancy Ellen Miller, Esquire, Reeves & Associates, APLC, Pasadena, CA, Amy Prokop, Carl Shusterman, Law Offices of Carl M. Shusterman, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    Aaron Nelson, Trial, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Mary A. Kenney, American Immigration Law Foundation, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae.
    Anthony J. Favero, Robert L. Reeves, Esquire, Reeves & Associates, APLC, Pasadena, CA, Jeremiah Johnson, Johnson & McDermed, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants Teresita G. Costelo and Lorenzo P. Ong.
    Elizabeth J. Stevens, Assistant Director, Gisela Ann Westwater, Trial, Aaron Nelson, Trial, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees.
    D.C. Nos. 5:08-cv-00840-JVS-SH, 8:08-cv-00688-JVS-SH.
   ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.