Case ID: f_169/html/1023-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "McPHERSON, District Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NEW JERSEY PATENT CO. et al. v. WALKER.
    (Circuit Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.
    May 17, 1909.)
    No. 255.
    Second Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
    For opinion on first motion, see 169 Fed. 146.
    Charles N. Butler, for complainants.
    Duke Walker, pro se.
   McPHERSON, District Judge.

As it seems to me, the new affidavits offered by the complainants do not satisfactorily establish the charge that the defendant has bought or threatens to buy phonographs or records from any licensed dealer, and the situation presented upon this second motion for a preliminary injunction is therefore the same as when the original motion was denied. The preliminary injunction now asked for is refused.