Case ID: ga-app_25/html/0773-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

11824.
    Davis v. The State.
    Decided November 9, 1920.
    Accusation of cheating and swindling; from city court of Cairo — Judge Eigsby. August 23, 1920.
    
      W. Henry Duckworth, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Ira Carlisle, solicitor, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

As the only grounds of the motion for a new trial in this case are those which complain of the verdict, and as there is evidence sufficient to support the verdict, which has the approval of the presiding- judge, the verdict must stand.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.