Case ID: sw2d_963/html/0391-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eirtis McKAY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. 71832.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Jan. 20, 1998.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 11, 1998.
    Application to Transfer Denied April 21, 1998.
    David C. Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for movant/appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jacqueline K. Hamra, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondeni/respondent.
    Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).