Case ID: sw2d_833/html/0479-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. David JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. 60576.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    July 14, 1992.
    
      John Klosterman, St. Louis, for defendant, appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Joan F. Edwards, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff, respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of possession of cocaine. We affirm. We find no error by the trial court and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).