Case ID: f-appx_654/html/0636-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dustin C. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lieutenant TINCHER; Sergeant Lundy; Warden Wright; Grievance Counselor Walls; Nurse Payne, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 16-6559
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 21, 2016
    Decided: July 22, 2016
    Dustin Chase Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Rosalie Fes-sier, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia, for Ap-pellees.
    Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dustin C. Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting one defendant’s motion to dismiss and granting in part and denying in part' the remaining defendants’ motion for summary judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Wilson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Robinson v. Parke-Davis & Co., 685 F.2d 912, 913 (4th Cir. 1982). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED