Case ID: f-appx_161/html/0829-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard MORRISON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Paul LAIRD, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 05-13605
    D.C. Docket No. 03-00381-CV-OC-10-GRJ.
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Dec. 30, 2005.
    Richard Morrison, Miami, FL, pro se.
    David Paul Rhodes, United States Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Respondent-Appellee.
    Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and BIRCH, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The district court, on June 14, 2005, dismissed with prejudice petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Record, Vol. 2 at Tab 32. The court dismissed the petition because it “simply reasserted] an argument that was raised and rejected on direct appeal and in [petitioner’s] subsequent [28 U.S.C.] § 2255 and other collateral proceedings.” Id.

Petitioner now appeals the court’s decision. We find no merit in his petition for the reasons stated in the district court’s June 14 order.

AFFIRMED.