Case ID: njl_81/html/0570-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FRANK GARRETT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. ATLANTIC CITY AND SHORE RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    Argued November 16, 1910
    Decided March 6, 1911.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 50 Vroom 127.
    
    Eor the plaintiff in error, Wescott <& Wescott.
    
    Eor the defendant in error, Thompson &. Gole.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion pf Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—Svvayze, Reed, Trenchard, Bergen, Yoorhees, Minturn, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Congdon, JJ. 9.

For reversa<1—The Chancellor, Bogert, J. 2.