Case ID: so2d_559/html/0111-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, WORKERS COMPENSATION CARRIER, Appellant, v. Leotis BROWN, Carlisle Construction Company, Inc., Coutinho Construction Company, Inc., etc., et al., Appellees.
    No. 88-3200.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    April 18, 1990.
    Neil J. Hayes of Neil J. Hayes, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Philip M. Burlington of Edna L. Caruso, P.A., and Moses Baker, Jr., of Searcy & Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order which determined appellant’s worker’s compensation lien and remand with direction to conduct an eviden-tiary hearing upon proper written notice.

The panel which heard this appeal has concluded the issue of inadequate notice to be dispositive and has not reached the remaining issue.

GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and GARRETT, JJ., concur.