Case ID: wash_11/html/0035-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Hoyt, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 1542.
    Decided February 1, 1895.]
    The Colton Mercantile Company, Respondent, v. Luella Duff et al., Appellants.
    
    APPEAL — SUFFICIENCY OF PLEADING — OBJECTION NOT RAISED IN BRIEF.
    Where there is no question before the court on appeal except the sufficiency of the complaint and that point is not raised in appellant’s brief, the appeal will be dismissed.
    
      Appeal from Superior Court, Whitman County.
    
    
      James W. Reid, for appellants.
    
      Chadwick & Fullerton, for respondent.
   The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, C. J.

Upon the hearing the purported statement of facts was stricken from the record, leaving for our consideration only the question of the sufficiency of the pleadings. It is claimed on the part of appellants that they have raised the question of the sufficiency of the complaint in their brief, but we are unable to find anything therein which sufficiently challenges the complaint to authorize us to enter into an investigation as to its sufficiency. See Francioli v. Brue, 4 Wash. 124 (29 Pac. 928).

The judgment will be affirmed.

Scott, Anders, Dunbar and Gordon, JJ-, concur.