Case ID: so2d_553/html/0339-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Elizabeth E. PFEIFFER, Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. Arthur W. PFEIFFER, Appellee/Cross Appellant.
    No. 89-0189.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Dec. 6, 1989.
    Joan B. Tucker of Brackett, Cook, Sned, Welch, D’Angio & Tucker, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant/cross appellee.
    Timothy W. Gaskill of DeSantis, Cook, Kauffman, Gaskill, McCarthy, Schwartz & Hunston, P.A., North Palm Beach, for ap-pellee/cross appellant.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appeal and cross appeal except for the equitable distribution. Because of a mathematical error in the present day valuation of the insurance agency, a marital asset, we remand for the trial court — at the individual expense of the respective parties — to correct same and to effect such equitable distribution as the trial court may determine based on a correct valuation figure.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.