Case ID: so3d_138/html/1137-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Natalia PEYSINA, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc., Appellee.
    No. 3D14-8.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 14, 2014.
    
      Parrish & Yarnell, P.A., and Jon D. Parrish (Naples), for appellant.
    Morris, Laing, Evans, Brock & Kennedy, CHTD, and Jeremy W. Harris, Khari E. Taustin, Masimba M. Matamba, and Angela Barbosa Wilborn (West Palm Beach), for appellee.
    Before WELLS, LAGOA, and LOGUE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm because competent, substantial evidence supports the trial court’s finding that Deutsche Bank National Trust Company conducted an adequate search to locate Natalia Peysina prior to constructive service. See generally Giron v. Ugly Mortg., Inc., 935 So.2d 580, 582 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (“If there is a challenge to constructive service, the trial court has the duty of determining ... whether the plaintiff conducted an adequate search to locate the defendants. Our standard of review determines whether there was competent substantial evidence to support the decision of the trial judge.”) (internal citation omitted).