Case ID: f-appx_111/html/0998-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MURPHY, Circuit Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stephen H. PAVEY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-1540.
    United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
    Nov. 2, 2004.
    John W. Suthers, U.S. Attorney, Brenda Taylor, Robert M. Russel, Denver, CO, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Stephen M. Wheeler, Evergreen, CO, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before EBEL, MURPHY, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant, Stephen H. Pavey, appeals the district court’s revocation of his five-year term of probation and its imposition of a six-month term of imprisonment to be followed by a three-year term of supervised release. On September 14, 2004, Pavey was ordered to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed as moot. See United States v. Meyers, 200 F.3d 715, 721-22 (10th Cir.2000) (holding that an appeal from the revocation of supervised release and resulting imprisonment becomes moot upon the completion of the term of imprisonment). Although Pavey has filed an untimely response to the order to show cause, he has failed to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction over his appeal. Specifically, he has failed to adequately show how his term of supervised release differs in any material way from his term of probation. Accordingly, we conclude that this appeal is moot and that we lack jurisdiction to consider the merits of Pavey’s claims. The appeal is dismissed. Appellee’s motion seeking to file a Supplemental Appendix is denied.