Case ID: so2d_423/html/1137-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. DENNIS, Justice,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Louisiana v. Ernest Lee BREAUX.
    No. 82-KA-0932.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Dec. 10, 1982.
    William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leonard K. Knapp, Dist. Atty., Eugene Bouquet, Robert R. Bryant, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-appellee.
    Carl A. Leckband, Jr., James Miquez, Mi-quez & Leckband, Lake Charles, for defendant-appellant.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DENNIS, J., concurs.

DENNIS, Justice,

concurring.

I respectfully concur.

However, the questions of whether the evidence of intent to arouse sexual desire and whether the defendant was tried by a jury of the proper number deserve written reasons by the court.