Case ID: njl_130/html/0555-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ALBERT SCHER, APPELLANT, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO., RESPONDENT.
    Submitted May 28, 1943
    Decided September 16, 1943.
    For the appellant, Levy & Krauss and Walter G. Winne.
    
    For the respondent, Cox & Walburg.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafeertt, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.