Case ID: sw2d_916/html/0858-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ray MAHLBERG, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. 68936.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Feb. 20, 1996.
    Deborah B. Wafer, Dist. Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jill C. LaHue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Defendant pled guilty to passing bad checks, § 570.120, RSMo 1994. Pursuant to a plea bargain, the trial court imposed a sentence of three years imprisonment.

Defendant filed a Rule 24.035 motion. Thereafter, the motion court entered judgment denying the motion without a hearing. On appeal, defendant alleges the trial court erred in accepting his plea of guilty because there was an insufficient factual basis to support his conviction. However, defendant failed to raise this issue in his Rule 24.035 motion. We have no jurisdiction to review issues which were not before the motion court. State v. Light, 835 S.W.2d 933, 941 (Mo.App.E.D.1992).

The motion court’s judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).