Case ID: okla-crim_31/html/0266-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

O. W. HIGGINS v. STATE.
    No. A-5134.
    Opinion Filed July 25, 1925.
    (238 Pac. 1118.)
    See, also, 29 Okla. Cr. 367, 233 P. 1116.
    E. T. Barbour, for plaintiff in error.
    The Attorney General and G. B. Fulton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   PER CURIAM.

In this case the Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, upon the ground that the plaintiff in error is a" fugitive from justice. This motion is supported by the affidavits of the sheriff and the county attorney of Canadian county, and proof of service upon the attorney for plaintiff in error is shown, but no response to said motion has been made. From the motion, and the affidavits in support thereof, it appears that plaintiff in error cannot at this time be made to respond to any order or judgment of this court. The motion is therefore sustained, and the appeal dismissed.