Case ID: ga_162/html/0627-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Beck, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rhodes v. The State.
    Constitutional Law, 12 C. J. p. 896, n. 34; p. 1187, n. 42; p. 1208, n. 56.
    No. 5210.
    September 11, 1926.
    Certiorari. Before Judge Franklin. Richmond superior court. September 26, 1925.
    
      Hammond & Kennedy and Pierce Brothers, for plaintiff.
    
      W. Inman Gurry, solicitor, and George Hames, solicitor-general, contra.
   Beck, P. J.

1. The constitutional questions raised in this case by the plaintiff in error are decided adversely to his contentions, in the case of Williams v. State, ante, 327 (133 S. E. 843).

2. Under the evidence in the case there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the court in revoking the parole of the accused.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.