Case ID: okla_118/html/0238-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BAY, 0.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HOOVEN v. OKLAHOMA COTTON GROWERS’ ASS’N.
    No. 16702
    Opinion Filed June 8, 1926.
    Case Followed.
    • For law of the case see syllabus in Oklahoma Oottch Growers Association v. Salyer, 114 Okla. 77, 243 Pac. 232.
    ((Syllabus by Bay, O.)
    Commissioners’ Opinion, Division Not 1.
    Error from District Court, Carter County; W. F. Freeman, Judge.
    Action by Oklahoma Cotton. Growers Association against N. M. Bfodven. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
    Reversed.
    Sigler & Jackson, for plaintiff in error.
   ■ Opinion by

BAY, 0.

It is apparent from an examination of plaintiff in error’s brief and the record, that the case is controlled by the case of Oklahoma' Cotton Growers Association v. Salyer, 114 Okla. 77, 243 Pac. 232. A similar contract was there helu to be illegal and unenforceable. For the law of the case, see the syllabus in that ease.

The judgment is reversed, with directions to dismiss the action.

By the Court: It is so ordered.