Case ID: nw2d_814/html/0357-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "M_ Christopher J. Dietzen Associate Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Julie A. BOURGOIN, Respondent, v. The GILLETTE COMPANY, Self-Insured/ESIS, Relator.
    No. A11-2288.
    Supreme Court of Minnesota.
    June 7, 2012.
    Jason Schmickle, Aafedt, Forde, Gray, Monson & Hagar, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for relator.
    
      Sean M. Quinn, Stephanie Balmer, Fal-sani, Balmer, Peterson, Quinn & Beyer, Duluth, MN, for respondent.
   ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on November 23, 2011, be and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

M_ Christopher J. Dietzen Associate Justice