Case ID: so2d_561/html/0028-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Orlando MANSO, Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. HEIL-QUAKER CORPORATION, Appellee/Cross Appellant, v. KING KOOL AIR, INC., et al., Appellees.
    No. 88-3425.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 16, 1990.
    John N. Buso, West Palm Beach, for appellant/cross appellee.
    Philip T. Crenshaw and Rafael J. Roca of Arnstein & Lehr, West Palm Beach, for appellee/cross appellant Heil-Quaker Corp.
   PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary judgment entered in favor of Defendant, Heil-Quaker Corporation, and against Plaintiff, Orlando Manso, because there is a genuine issue of material fact which precludes summary judgment, as a matter of law. The issue is whether the air conditioning unit, manufactured by Heil-Quaker Corporation, was defective causing Manso’s damages. See Cassisi v. Maytag Company, 396 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

REVERSED AND REMANDED for further proceedings consistent herewith.

WALDEN, GUNTHER and GARRETT, JJ., concur.