Case ID: so2d_393/html/0066-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Stanley STEINBRECHER, Respondent.
    No. 81-83.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Feb. 3, 1981.
    Rehearing Denied Feb. 20, 1981.
    
      Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
    Jack Nageley, Miami Beach, for respondent.
    Before SCHWARTZ, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Although we are unaware of any authority to support the trial judge’s ruling declining to limit polygraph testimony, and we do not approve his decision, we decline to entertain the state’s petition for certiora-ri because review by certiorari of pre-trial evidentiary rulings appears inappropriate. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c).