Case ID: njl_127/html/0234-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RUTGERS ASSOCIATION OF BETA THETA PI, RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK ET AL., APPELLANTS.
    Argued May 21, 1941 —
    Decided September 19, 1941.
    For the respondent, Hicks, Kuhlthau, Thompson & Deshler.
    
    For the appellants, Paul W. Ewing.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — -The Chancellob, Chiee Justice, Paekee, Bodine, Peeskie, Poetee, Colie, Deae, Wells, Woles-Keil, Raeeeety, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.