Case ID: misc_199/html/0216-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles Vassalo, Respondent, v. Dora Stakser, Appellant.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    January 18, 1951.
    
      
      Elihu A. Novicio for appellant.
    
      James A. Murphy and Samuel Levy for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Upon the facts presented the plaintiff has no maintainable cause of action against the defendant for the removal of the antenna.

The judgment should be reversed, with $10 costs, and complaint dismissed upon the merits, with costs.

Hammer, Edeb and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.