Case ID: misc2d_28/html/0510-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Henderson Investors, Respondent, v. Henderson Equities, Inc., et al., Appellants.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    November 3, 1960.
    
      Richard 8. Hull for appellants. David 8. Meyer for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The order appealed from is not appealable as of course, and it does not appear that permission to appeal has been granted (N. Y. City Mun. Ct. Code, § 154, subd. 7 ; Abel Toy & Novelty Co. v. Giaquinto Contr. Corp., 8 Misc 2d 1039).

The appeal should be dismissed.

Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.

Appeal dismissed.