Case ID: sw3d_557/html/0521-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Casitdel WOOTEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    ED 105915
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    Filed: September 11, 2018
    Gwenda R. Robinson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
    Joshua D. Hawley, Mary H. Moore, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
    Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Casitdel Wooten appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 29.15 (2015) after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2018).