Case ID: so2d_211/html/0059-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Roy Lee BAKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 67-451.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    May 28, 1968.
    Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Herbert M. Klein, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arthur L. Rothenberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
    Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The only point preserved for review on this appeal is the question of the “voluntariness” of a statement given by the appellant.

From the record, it appears that counsel for the appellant [defendant in the trial court] conceded that the statement was given voluntarily. Therefore, we find the point not to be well taken on this appeal. Compare: Morgan v. State, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 60; State v. Jones, Fla.1967, 204 So.2d 515; Colebrook v. State, Fla.App.1968, 205 So.2d 675; Grace v. State, Fla.App.1968, 206 So.2d 225; Harris v. State, Fla.App.1968, 208 So.2d 108; DeRiggi v. State, Fla.App.1968, 209 So.2d 714 [opinion filed April 30, 1968],

Affirmed.