Case ID: njl_116/html/0181-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MARY JASNIG, RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES A. WINTER, EXECUTOR, ETC., APPELLANT.
    Submitted October 25, 1935 —
    Decided January 31, 1936.
    For the respondent, Frank Pascarella.
    
    For the appellant, Cox & Walburg.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.