Case ID: njl_111/html/0382-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DOROTHY L. BERRY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. SILENT AUTOMATIC SALES COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
    Submitted May 26, 1933
    Decided September 27, 1933.
    
      For the respondent-appellant, John A. Matthews.
    
    For the petitioner-respondent, DeBaun & Westervelt (Jesse B. Leslie, of counsel).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Van Buskiitk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.