Case ID: nd_24/html/0326-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SECKERSON v. SINCLAIR.
    (140 N. W. 239.)
    Opinion filed November 20, 1912.
    Rehearing denied January 7, 1913.
    Motions by respondent to dismiss tbe appeal and also to vacate an order made by a-judge of this court permitting a supersedeas undertaking on appeal to be given.
    First motion denied and second motion granted.
    
      Garr & Kneeland and 8. E. Ellsworth, for respondent.
    
      Knauf & Knwuf, for appellant.
   Per Curiam.

Tbe motions in tbe case at bar present tbe same questions that were just decided by us in tbe case of Burger v. Sinclair [next case] 140 N. W. 235, and tbe decision in tbat case controls tbis. Tbe same order will accordingly be made herein, with tbe exception tbat no costs are allowed.

Goss, L, being disqualified, did not participate.