Case ID: f-appx_649/html/0309-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Roger F. CARLSON; Mary Jo Carlson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DEL WEBB COMMUNITIES, INC.; Pulte Homes, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and South Carolina State Plastering, LLC; Peter Conley, Defendants.
    No. 15-2349.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 23, 2016.
    Decided: May 20, 2016.
    
      William Jefferson Leath, Jr., Michael S. Seekings, Leath, Bouch & Seekings, LLP, Charleston, South Carolina; Phillip W. Se-guí, Jr., Amanda Morgan Blundy, Segui Law Firm, PC, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellants. Robert L. Widener, McNair Law Firm, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina; A. Victor Rawl, Jr., Henry W. Frampton, rV, McNair Law Firm, P.A., Charleston, South Carolina, for Ap-pellees.
    Before TRAXLER,. Chief Judge, and GREGORY and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roger F. Carlson and Mary Jo Carlson appeal the district court’s order denying their motion under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) (2012) seeking attorney’s fees. We have reviewed the' district court’s decision for abuse of discretion and find none. See In re Lowe, 102 F.3d 731, 733 n. 2 (4th Cir.1996) (noting that district court has discretion to award fees on remand). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carlson v. Del Webb Communities, Inc., No. 9:15-cv-00292-SB (D.S.C. Oct. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.