Case ID: so2d_574/html/1231-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Majed Sal HACK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 90-1012.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Feb. 28, 1991.
    H. Manuel Hernandez, Longwood, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nancy Ryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of probation imposed by the lower court and direct the court to hold a hearing on restitution on appellant’s motion. See A.P. v. State, 558 So.2d 519 (Fla.1990).

As in Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), we certify to the supreme court the following question:

DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?

DAUKSCH, COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.