Case ID: f-appx_468/html/0219-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cheryl B. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McCREARY MODERN, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 11-1901.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 28, 2012.
    Decided: March 7, 2012.
    Jenny L. Sharpe, Law Office of Jenny L. Sharpe, Charlotte, North Carolina; Tamara W. Brooks, Brooks Law Office, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Stephen M. Thomas, Michael P. Thomas, Susan W. Matthews, Patrick, Harper & Dixon, L.L.P., Hickory, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before GREGORY, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cheryl B. Carter appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of McCreary Modern, Inc., in her action in which she alleged that McCreary regarded her as disabled and employed improper qualifications standards in denying her employment. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs filed by the parties and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carter v. McCreary Modern, Inc., No. 5:10-cv-00014-RLV-DSC, 2011 WL 3444090 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.