Case ID: f-appx_30/html/0108-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Chuks Evaristus NWANERI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General; Janet Reno, Former U.S. Attorney General; William Barr, Attorney General; Richard D. Bennett, U.S. Attorney; Lynne Ann Battaglia, U.S. Attorney; Robert Harding, Assistant U.S. Attorney; Jan Miller, Assistant U.S. Attorney; Jeff Bielski, D.E.A. Agent, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 01-8009.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 14, 2002.
    Decided Feb. 27, 2002.
    Chuks Evaristus Nwaneri, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Chuks Evaristus Nwaneri appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing his action and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nwaneri v. Ashcroft, No. CA-01-3059JFM (D. Md. Oct. 22 & Nov. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.