Case ID: nj-eq_110/html/0659-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dora Eitner, respondent, v. Alfred Eitner, appellant.
    [Decided May 16th, 1932.]
    
      Mr. John J. Clancy, Mr. Merritt Lane, Mr. Philip J. Bchotland and Mr. Herbert L. Elins, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. Richard H. Cashion, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 107 N. J. Eq. 88.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Van Buskers:, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.