Case ID: so2d_635/html/1066-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jaco McCALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 93-305.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    April 29, 1994.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Asst. Public Defender, Day-tona Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robin Compton Jones, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The appellants’ judgment and sentence are affirmed, but we vacate the order finding him to be an habitual felony offender in circuit court case number CR92-305. In that ease appellant was charged with a violation of probation based on his commission of a crime in a later case in which he was habitualized. The habitualization order in CR92-305 appears to be a scrivener’s error that is inconsistent with the oral pronouncement at the sentencing hearing. Habitualization for ease number CR92-7668, the later case, was correct.

JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED; ORDER OF HABITUALIZATION IN CR92-305 VACATED.

W. SHARP, PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.