Case ID: wash_143/html/0691-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 20226.
    Department One.
    March 30, 1927.]
    C. S. Baker, Appellant, v. E. D. Sherwood et al., Respondents. 
      
    
    Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Oswald, X, entered February 6, 1926, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action to enforce a laborer’s lien.
    Affirmed.
    
      Roehe & Ayers, for appellant.
    B. H. Belden and Williams é Cornelius, for respondents.
    
      
      Reported in 254 Pac. 457.
    
   Per Curiam.

The appellant, as assignee of a claimed lien for labor performed in raising crops on property owned by the respondents, having failed to take proper exceptions to the findings of the trial court, is limited in this appeal to an examination of those findings to determine whether they support the conclusions and judgment.

According to the findings, the appellant’s assignor waived by his conduct any claim that he may have had to a lien or claim for eloignment of the crop, and estoppel prevents his recovery in this action. Our examination of these findings leads us to the same conclusion as that reached by the trial court and the judgment refusing the appellant a recovery must therefore be sustained. Bell v. Swalwell Land, Loan & Trust Co., 20 Wash. 602, 56 Pac. 401; Rogers v. Reynolds, 95 Wash. 470, 164 Pac. 80.

Affirmed.