Case ID: so2d_903/html/0302-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Herby LUMA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D05-450.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 8, 2005.
    Herby Luma, in proper person.
    Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Ishir Mehta, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before GERSTEN, FLETCHER and RAMIREZ, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Forcelledo v. State, 898 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)(“The State is allowed to give notice under as many classifications as it chooses, where the State is prepared to show the defendant meets the statutory criteria.”); Cooper v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)(notice deficiency does not render a sentence “illegal” for the purposes of a rule 3.800 petition; claim should have been raised via 3.850 and is now time barred).