Case ID: sw3d_204/html/0328-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Terry GRAY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 86967.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Oct. 24, 2006.
    Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jayne T. Woods, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terry Gray (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 postconvietion motion to vacate judgment and sentence after an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s findings are not clearly erroneous. Simmons v. State, 100 S.W.3d 143, 145 (Mo.App. E.D.2003). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b). 
      
      . All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2006, unless otherwise indicated.