Case ID: so2d_475/html/1276-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ilyse A. SUSSKIND, Appellant, v. Harry B. SUSSKIND, Appellee.
    No. 84-2308.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Sept. 10, 1985.
    Rehearing Denied Oct. 23, 1985.
    Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik and Paul Louis, Alejandro M. Sanchez and Dwight Sullivan, Miami, for appellant.
    Maurice Jay Kutner, Miami, for appellee.
    
      Before NESBITT, FERGUSON and JOR-GENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The former wife appeals a final summary judgment entered against her on her petition to vacate or set aside a property settlement agreement incorporated into a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We affirm the judgment appealed upon a holding that appellant’s allegations in support of her petition (fraud, duress, coercion and failure to provide full disclosure) form the basis for a claim of intrinsic fraud. DeClaire v. Yohanan, 453 So.2d 375 (Fla.1984); Langer v. Langer, 463 So.2d 429 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); August v. August, 350 So.2d 794 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Any petition to vacate a judgment on grounds of intrinsic fraud must be- filed within one year after the entry of the judgment. De-Claire; Langer. Appellant’s petition to set aside or vacate was filed almost four years after the entry of the final judgment of dissolution which incorporated the property settlement agreement.

Affirmed.