Case ID: ga-app_28/html/0452-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

13226.
    Hayes v. The State.
    Decided April 11, 1922.
   Bloodworth, J.

The special grounds of the motion for a new trial are without merit. There is evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and, as no error of law appears, this court is powerless to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of Alma — .Judge Tuten. November 26, 1921.

I. J. Bussell, for plaintiff in error.

H. L. Causey, solicitor, contra.