Case ID: so2d_768/html/0443-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Darryle T. COOK, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. SC93781.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Aug. 31, 2000.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Lyle Hitchens, Assistant Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Kellie A. Nielan, Wesley Heidt and Belle B. Schumann, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Cook v. State, 714 So.2d 674 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), a decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal citing as controlling authority its decision in Maddox v. State, 708 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), approved in part, disapproved in part, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981). We quash the district court’s decision in this case and remand for consideration in light of our opinion in Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000).

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.