Case ID: so2d_255/html/0273-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert Ralph MORET, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 71-511.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 30, 1971.
    Milton E. Grusmark, Miami Beach, for appellant.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
    Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying a petition filed pursuant to CrPR 3.850, 33 F.S.A. The order was entered after a full evidentiary hearing. The argument presented on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying the petition upon the basis of the evidence presented upon the petition. We affirm the order appealed upon the rule stated in Plymale v. State, Fla.App.1967, 201 So.2d 85, 86, where it is stated:

* * * * * *
“If the evidence in the record on appeal, viewed in a light most favorable to the trial court’s ruling, supports the order he should be affirmed. See: Crum v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 24; Hennessy v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 198 So.2d 37.”
******

Affirmed.