Case ID: ny_172/html/0595-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Henry B. Dorney, Respondent, v. Hugh O’Neill, Appellant.
    
      Dorney v. O'Neill, 60 App. Div. 19, affirmed.
    (Argued June 23, 1902;
    decided October 7, 1902.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 11, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new •trial.
    
      David B. Sill and Eugene Lamb Richards, Jr., for appellant.
    
      Charles SteoMer and Levin L. Brown for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Pabkee, Ch. J., Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Webneb, JJ. Not voting: O’Bbien, J.