Case ID: njl_110/html/0515-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FRANK A. DEPTULA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued February 14, 1933
    Decided April 28, 1933.
    
      
      Messrs. Wall, Haight, Carey & Haripence, for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. Degheri & Ormsby {Mr. Edward A. MarMey, Mr. Bernard M. Degheri and Mr. Alexander F. Ormsby, of counsel), for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, CniEE Justice, Teen-chard, Parker, Case, ITehee, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.