Case ID: a3d_170/html/1040-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Leo J. DOLAN, Jr. and Cherie M. Dolan, H/W, v. HURD MILLWORK COMPANY, INC., Bentley Homes, Ltd., Garvin Mitchell Corporation, Chadwell Associates, L.P., Chadwell Realty, Inc., Harrison Community Association, Petition of: Leo J. Dolan, Jr.
    No. 168 MAL 2017
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    September 11, 2017
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

(1) What is the proper role of an appellate court in reviewing a non-jury decision where it deems the Pa. R.A.P. 1925(a) opinion inadequate but the trial judge is no longer available to provide a supplemental opinion?
(2) If the appellate court is required to reach the merits of the trial court’s decision, what are the appropriate scope and standard of review?