Case ID: f-appx_308/html/0669-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gilbert L. SPURLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS; Mark Adkins, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 08-2064.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 5, 2009.
    Decided: Jan. 21, 2009.
    Gilbert L. Spurlock, Appellant Pro Se. Carol A. Casto, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Gilbert L. Spurlock appeals the district court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Spurlock v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, No. 3:07-cv-00643-RCC, 2008 WL 3992774 (S.D.W.Va. Aug. 21, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.