Case ID: ohio-law-abs_5/html/0124-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 158
    LUPSON et v. ZINK
    No. 20189.
    Supreme Court
    On motion to certify.
    Dock. Nov. 24, 1926,
    4 Abs. 805.
    1104. STATUTES — Is 1685 GC., requiring a court of record to determine and adjudicate matters submitted to it within thirty days, mandatory or directory?
    First Publication of this Case
    Attorneys — J. A. Jeffers for Lupson; H. Nus-baum for Zink; all of Canton.
   This case involves the construction of Sec. 1685 GC., which provides that a Court of record determine and adjudicate matters submitted to it within thirty days after such submission. The question involved is:—

Whether this statute is mandatory and must be observed by the Courts or whether it is simply directory and may be disregarded by the Court if it so desires.

Note — Motion to certify overruled, 5 Abs. 44.