Case ID: sw2d_897/html/0212-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John D. COOPER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Don DARR & Don Darr Pontiac, Inc., Defendants/Appellants, and Diestelkamp Construction Co., Defendant/Respondent.
    No. 66920.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    May 2, 1995.
    Thomas J. Casey, Jonathan E. Fortman, Casey & Meyerkord, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Patricia A. Manhart, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before AHRENS, P.J., and GRIMM and KAROHL, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, John Cooper, appeals after summary judgment in favor of defendant, Dies-telkamp Construction Co., on his personal injury claim.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).