Case ID: sw2d_792/html/0014-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William Oliver McCOLLUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 56937.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    April 24, 1990.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 30, 1990.
    Application to Transfer Denied July 31, 1990.
    Dorothy Mae Hirzy, Cheryl Rafert, St. Louis, for appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, William Oliver McCollum, appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely filed. We have reviewed appellant’s allegations of error, the entire record upon which they are based, and the findings and conclusions of the motion court. We do not find the court’s action to be clearly erroneous and find that an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We, therefore, affirm the court’s dismissal of appellant’s motion pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, which sets forth the basis of the court’s decision.