Case ID: nj-eq_90/html/0274-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jesse W. Fenton, appellant, v. William S. Crook et al., respondents.
    [Decided February 6th, 1919.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevens, whose opinion is reported in 88 N. J. Eq. 432.
    
    
      Mr. Samuel Roessler, for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. Codington & Blalz, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens. ,

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, White, PIerpeniieimer, Williams, Gardner — 12.

For reversal — None.