Case ID: njl_110/html/0455-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GEORGE PALM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. EDWARD BAHR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Submitted February 17, 1933
    Decided April 27, 1933.
    For the prosecutor-appellant, Emil Neblo.
    
    For the defendant-respondent, Kalisch •& Kalisch.
    
   Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. See, also, Thomas v. Liondale Bleach, Dye and Print Works, 10 N. J. Mis. R. 255.

For affirmance — The Chahcellob, Chiee Justice, Paeicee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Hehee, Yah Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.