Case ID: ny_203/html/0595-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dunelle Van Schaick, Respondent, v. Oscar Heyman et al., Doing Business under the Firm Name of Oscar Heyman & Co., Appellants.
    
      Van Schaick v. Heyman, 138 App. Div. 905, affirmed.
    (Argued October 27,1911;
    decided November 21, 1911.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 9, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed .by the court in an action to recover for goods alleged to have been sold and delivered.
    
      Arthur B. Hyman, Martin Paskus and William S. Gordon for appellants.
    
      William H. Hamilton and Thomas Gregory for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Chase and Collin, JJ.