Case ID: so2d_805/html/1082-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harold RIGGENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 5D00-3581.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Feb. 1, 2002.
    Harold Riggens, Bushnell, pro se.
    No Appearance for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Atwater v. State, 788 So.2d 223, 227 (Fla.2001) (“[Hjabeas corpus petitions are not to be used for additional appeals on questions which could have been, should have been, or were raised on appeal or in a rule 3.850 motion, or on matters that were not objected to at trial”) (quoting Parker v. Dugger, 550 So.2d 459, 460 (Fla.1989)).

THOMPSON, C.J., PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.