Case ID: f-appx_256/html/0731-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Damacio ANDRADE-CASTANEDA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-10237.
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Dec. 5, 2007.
    Tamara Lynn Reno, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Lars Robert Isaacson, Bennett, Weston & Lajone, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case following remand's for resentencing, Damacio Andrade-Castaneda raises arguments that are foreclosed by the law of the case doctrine. See United States v. Matthews, 312 F.3d 652, 657 (5th Cir.2002) (holding that under the law of the case doctrine, an issue of fact or law decided on appeal may not be reexamined by the appellate court on a subsequent appeal). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.