Case ID: sw3d_323/html/0820-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas E. HUTSLER, II, Respondent, v. Mark VASTO, Appellant.
    No. WD 71769.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Sept. 28, 2010.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 2, 2010.
    
      Jennifer A. Donnelli, Esq., and Thomas E. Nanney, Esq., Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
    Anthony A. Stein, Esq., and Timothy J. Mudd, Esq., Kansas City, MO, for respondent.
    Before: JOSEPH M. ELLIS, P.J., and ALOK AHUJA and KAREN KING MITCHELL, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Hutsler filed a petition in the Platte County Circuit Court seeking an Order of Protection against Mark Vasto, based on repeated confrontations between the two. Vasto failed to appear at the hearing on Hutsler’s request for a full Order of Protection. The circuit court granted Hutsler a default judgment, and later denied Vasto’s Motion to Set Aside the default. Vasto appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).