Case ID: cust-ct_3/html/0442-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 42450.
    Protests 33329-G, etc., of James McCreery & Co. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel embroidered trimmings, allovers, net insertions, flouncings, and trimmings similar to those the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and Abstract 12555, filet lace articles like those passed upon in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Normandy lace articles similar to the merchandise the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 id. 353, C. A. D. 40), and embroidered wearing apparel and pillow cases similar to those passed upon in Pustet v. United States supra, were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.