Case ID: so2d_557/html/0110-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

VENUS LABORATORIES, INC., etc., et al., Appellants, v. Fred KATZ and Adele Katz, his wife, Appellees.
    No. 89-1783.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Feb. 6, 1990.
    
      Hertzberg & Malinski and Deborah Marks, for appellants.
    Richard and Richard and Brian S. Behar, for appellees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The defendants’ failure twice to satisfactorily answer the plaintiffs’ interrogatories did not justify striking their pleadings and entering a default against them. See Summit Chase Condominium Ass’n v. Protean Investors, Inc., 421 So.2d 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Accordingly, the orders under review are reversed without prejudice to consideration of any appropriate lesser sanction.