Case ID: kan_77/html/0855-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James R. Scott v. Nancy Leonard et al.
    
    No. 15,387.
    (94 Pac. 1135.)
    Error from «Chautauqua district court; Granville P. Aikman, judge.
    Opinion filed February 8, 1908.
    Affirmed.
    
      J. E. Brooks, and C. W. Spencer, for plaintiff in error.
    
      W. H. Sproul, and N. E. Van Tuyl, for defendants in error.
   Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is denied. The decision upon the merits is controlled by the opinion rendered in the case of Ham v. Booth, 72 Kan. 429, 83 Pac. 24, with which the court is entirely satisfied. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.