Case ID: f-appx_48/html/0670-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Patricia A. McCOLM, Debtor-Appellant, v. Brian HOLT, Trustee-Appellee, Elizabeth Edwards; et al., Appellees, Linda Ekstrom Stanley, Trustee-Appellee.
    No. 01-17381.
    D.C. No. 01-00678-MHP.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 7, 2002.
    
    Decided Oct. 11, 2002.
    Before FERNANDEZ, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Patricia A. McColm appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing her bankruptcy appeal with prejudice for failure to obey court orders and for failure to prosecute. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, Morris v. Morgan Stanley & Co., 942 F.2d 648, 650 (9th Cir.1991), and we reverse and remand.

The district court erred in determining that McColm’s response to the June 28, 2001 Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) was untimely. The OSC allowed McColm 30 days to respond. McColm filed a timely response on July 30, 2001. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 6(a); Kim v. Commandant, Def. Language Inst., Foreign Language Ctr., 772 F.2d 521, 524 (9th Cir.1985) (per curiam) (noting that under Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(a), where the last day for performance of the act falls on a Sunday, performance on the next day is timely).

REVERSED and REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.