Case ID: f-appx_62/html/0547-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Cornell SWIFT, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 01-6925.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted April 24, 2003.
    Decided May 15, 2003.
    James Cornell Swift, Appellant Pro Se. James Ashford Metcalfe, Assistant United States Attorney, William David Muhr, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

James Cornell Swift appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Swift, No. CR-99-13 (E.D.Va. May 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.