Case ID: so2d_542/html/0473-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George Benjamin BARBERI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 88-1280.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    May 4, 1989.
    Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and William A. Hatch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal of restitution orders entered pursuant to appellant’s five criminal convictions. We must remand in order that the trial court specify the amount of restitution in the five sentencing orders. As to three of the offenses, the amounts are set out in the presentence investigation report and need only be transcribed into the orders. For two of the cases, however, restitution amounts were not specified in the presen-tence investigation report, and a hearing is required to set the amounts.

ERVIN, BOOTH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.