Case ID: ny-2d_40/html/0894-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Paul Borst, A Child Alleged to be Neglected, Appellant-Respondent. Lorraine Borst, Respondent-Appellant.
    Decided October 19, 1976
   On the court’s own motion, appeals by appellant infant and appellant mother transferred to the Appellate Division, Third Department, without costs. A direct appeal does not lie where questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, § 5, subd b; CPLR 5601, subd [b], par 2; Matter of Bartsch v State of New York, 33 NY2d 938).