Case ID: so3d_208/html/0833-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Armon EVERETT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D15-1219
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Opinion filed January 25, 2017
    Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker-Bradley, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jay E. Silver, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Floyd v. State, 569 So.2d 1225, 1232 (Fla. 1990) (“Lay witness opinion is admissible if it is within the ken of an intelligent person with a degree of experience. ... We find the officers’ testimony within the permissible range of lay observation and ordinary police experience.”)