Case ID: so2d_465/html/0602-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marcus HOWARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 83-1793.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 19, 1985.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Defendant Howard appeals his conviction and sentence for second-degree murder and attempted armed robbery. We affirm upon a finding that the evidence in the record and the reasonable inferences and deductions derived from the evidence support the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress statements he made to police. See McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410 (Fla.1978); Finney v. State, 420 So.2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Schlanger v. State, 397 So.2d 1028, 1029 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

DANIEL S. PEARSON, J., concurs in the result.