Case ID: nj-eq_100/html/0559-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Morris Breitman et al., appellants, v. Henry Jaehnel et al., respondents.
    [Decided January 31st, 1927.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Berry, whose opinion is reported in 99 N. J. Eq. 243.
    
    
      Mr. Benjamin Newman, for the appellants.
    
      Messrs. Edward A. & William A. Schilling, for the respondents.
   Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Mijsttuen, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Kays, JJ. 7.

For reversal — Katzenbach, Lloyd, McGlenuon, HetFIELD, JJ. 4.