Case ID: nj-eq_63/html/0802-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Benjamin Hancock, complainant and respondent, v. Ellison Elmer, defendant and appellant.
    [Filed June 23d, 1902.]
    
      Mr. David J. Pancoast, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Walter 11. Bacon, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Grey delivered in the court' below. See 16 Dick. Ch. Rep. 558.

For affirmance—^The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Garrison, Garretson, Pitney, Bogert, Krueger, Adams, VredenBURGH, VOORHEES—10.

For reversal—Dixon, Collins, Hendrickson, Vroom—4.