Case ID: johns-cas_1/html/0469-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Scofield and Wife against Lodie.
    Where the tenant, in a writ of right, demands a view, it is the duty of the demandant to sue out the writ of view, and if he does not, he will be non-suited.
    The tenant, in this cause, at a previous term, demanded a view; but no writ for that purpose, had been sued out by the defendant.
    
      Munro now moved,
    that the demandant sue out the writ of view, and cause view to be given, by the first day of the next term, or be nonsuited. He contended, that though the view is granted at the instance of the tenant, the demandant is bound to sue out the writ. He cited Booth, 40.
   Per Curiam.

Take your rule.

Rule granted. 
      
       See infra, 2 J. C.49; C. C. 98. See also supra, 335, n. (b) to Haines v. Budd.