Case ID: f3d_358/html/1280-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl M. DRURY, Jr., M.D., Doctor, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-12924.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Feb. 3, 2004.
    William E. Bubsey, McCord, Bubsey, Ketchum & Donohue, LLP, Tallahassee, FL, Thomas A. Withers, Gillen, Dailey, Cromwell & Withers, LLC, Savannah, GA, Edward T.M. Garland, Donald Samuel, Garland, Samuel & Loeb, P.C., Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Amy Lee Copeland, Savannah, GA, Edmund A. Booth, Jr., Augusta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    
      Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
   BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.