Case ID: pa_568/html/0036-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

791 A.2d 1153
    Gerald CRISWELL, III and Tracey Criswell, et ux., Petitioners, v. David S. KING, Respondent.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    March 12, 2002.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted limited to the following issue: Whether Petitioner was required to object to the verdict prior the discharge of the jury where the verdict was not inconsistent?