Case ID: us_291/html/0643-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 740.
    Ohio ex rel. Eastman v. Stuart et al.
    Jurisdictional statement submitted February 3, 1934.
    Decided February 12, 1934.
   Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Yesler v. Washington Harbor Line Comm’rs, 146 U.S. 646, 657; Farson Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U.S. 268, 271; Doyle v. Atwell, 261 U.S. 590; Howat v. Kansas, 258 U.S. 181, 189, 190; McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U.S. 302, 303.

Messrs. Erwin R. Effler, Rufus H. Baker, and Harold W. Fraser for appellant. Messrs. Frazier Reams and J. S. Rhinefort for appellees.