Case ID: sw3d_153/html/0868-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sarah D. SACHTLEBEN, Petitioner/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 84056.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Dec. 21, 2004.
    Samuel W. Panos, Chesterfield, MO, for appellant.
    Daniel L. Massey, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J, KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Sarah D. Sachtleben, appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying her petition for review of revocation of her driving privilege under Section 577.041 RSMo (2000) after she refused to submit to a chemical test. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).