Case ID: sw_228/html/0356-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      COBBS, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RAMSEY v. EVANS.
    (No. 6508.)
    (Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.
    Feb. 16, 1921.
    Rehearing Denied March 16, 1921.)
    Appeal and error (®=999(l)— Jury’s finding not disturbed when substantial justice done.
    In a fact case where the issues were submitted to a jury and substantial justice has been obtained,, the judgment will not be disturbed.
    Error from District Court, Hays County; M. C. Jeffrey, Judge
    Action between J. M. Ramsey and W. E. Evans. Judgment for Evans, and Ramsey brings error.
    Affii’med.
    J. Bouldin Rector, of Austin, for plaintiff in error.
   COBBS, J.

We overruled defendant in-error’s motion to dismiss this appeal, because we were satisfied that plaintiff in error filed his brief in ample time before the cause was submitted for it to-have been answered. Defendant in error filed no brief.

There were no new or important questions presented by assignment, nor any authorities cited in support of any of them.

We have read and considered the brief filed by plaintiff in error, and the supposed errors assigned.

This is a fact case. The issues were submitted to the jury, and they found for defendant in error. As we believe substantial justice has been obtained, we do not feel inclined to disturb the judgment and send the case back for another trial. Whitaker v. McCarty (Com. App.) 221 S. W. 572.

There is no reversible error assigned, and the assignments are all overruled, and the judgment is affirmed. 
      <g^>For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes