Case ID: so2d_641/html/0974-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas A. SNOWDEN, Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION and Lenzar Electro Optic, Inc., Appellees.
    No. 94-1735.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Sept. 9, 1994.
    Thomas A. Snowden, pro se appellant.
    Geri Atkinson-Hazelton, Gen. Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellee Unemployment Appeals Com’n.
   PER CURIAM.

We treat appellant’s July 18, 1994 statement as the initial brief. Upon consideration of the initial brief, we summarily affirm under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315.

HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and FARMER, JJ., concur.