Case ID: nj-tax_9/html/0090-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROMULUS DEVELOPMENT CORP., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF WEEHAWKEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. ROMULUS DEVELOPMENT CORP., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWN OF WEST NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
    Submitted February 19, 1987
    Decided March 5, 1987.
    Before Judges FURMAN, DREIER and SHEBELL.
    
      Venino & Venino, attorneys for the appellant Township of Weehawkin (Richard Venino of counsel and on the brief).
    
      Sidney I. Turtz, attorney for the appellant Town of West New York.
    
      McCarter & English, attorneys for respondent (William T. Reilly of counsel; Frank E. Ferruggia on the brief).
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Lasser in his opinion published at 7 N.J.Tax 305 (Tax Ct.1985).