Case ID: f-appx_20/html/0171-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Samuel R. ANSTEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Howard PAINTER, Mount Olive Correctional Complex, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 00-6521.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 20, 2001.
    Decided Oct. 9, 2001.
    Samuel R. Anstey, pro se. Leah Perry Macia, Bailey & Glasser, L.L.P., Charleston, WV, for appellee.
    Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Samuel R. Anstey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Anstey’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Anstey v. Painter, No. CA-99-120-5 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 16, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.