Case ID: pa-super_236/html/0517-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Commonwealth v. Scott, Appellant.
    Submitted April 14, 1975.
    Before Watkins, P. J., Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van der Voort, and Spaeth, JJ.
    
      Stephen P. Swem, Trial Defender, John J. Dean, Chief, Appellate Division, and George H. Ross, Public Defender, for appellant.
    
      
      Charles W. Johns and Robert L. Eberhardt, Assistant District Attorneys, John M. Tighe, First Assistant District Attorney, and John J. Hicktooi, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
    September 22, 1975:
   Opinion

per Curiam,

Appellant’s sole claim is that his waiver of a jury trial was inadequate under the standards set forth in Commonwealth v. Williams, 454 Pa. 368, 312 A.2d 597 (1973). This issue not having been raised in post-trial motions, it cannot be raised on this direct appeal. Commonwealth v. Agie, 449 Pa. 187, 296 A.2d 741 (1972).

Judgment affirmed.