Case ID: br_476/html/0094-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re James RIFFIN, Debtor, James Riffin, Debtor-Appellant, v. Patapsco Bank, Creditor-Appellee, Mark J. Friedman, Trustee.
    No. 12-1257.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 26, 2012.
    Decided: Aug. 1, 2012.
    James Riffin, Appellant Pro Se. Robert S. Glushakow, Nolan, Plumhoff & Williams, Chartered, Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Riffin appeals the district court’s orders: (1) granting the Appellee’s unopposed motion to dismiss Riffin’s appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order; and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Riffin v. Patapsco Bank (In re James Riffin), No. 1:11-cv-03203-CCB (D. Md. Nov. 10, 2011; Jan. 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.