Case ID: ohio-st_172/html/0385-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mattox v. Sacks, Warden.
    (No. 36930
    Decided July 12, 1961.)
    
      
      Mr. Pearl R. Mattox, in propria persona.
    
    
      Mr. Marh McElroy, attorney general, and Mr. Aubrey A. Wendt, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgments of conviction and sentence to review the alleged errors and irregularities which are nonjurisdictional and of wMch he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Radoliep and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.