Case ID: f-appx_138/html/0378-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jack BARRESI, Defendant-Appellant.
    Docket No. 04-3782-CR.
    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    July 8, 2005.
    
      Randolph Z. Volkell, Merrick, NY., for Appellant.
    Walter M. Norkin, Assistant United States Attorney, Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Roslynn R. Mauskopf, United States Attorney, Peter A. Norling, Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief), for Appellee.
    Present: POOLER, SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judges, and CHIN, District Judge.
    
    
      
      . The Honorable Denny Chin, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.
    
   SUMMARY ORDER

Jack Barresi appeals the June 18, 2004, sentence of two years imprisonment imposed upon him after his plea of guilty to two counts of violation of supervised release. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, the underlying proceedings, and specification of appellate issues.

Barresi argues as his sole ground for reversal that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh. We review the reasonability of a sentence imposed for violation of supervised release deferentially, recognizing that the district court has a superior opportunity to judge the reasonability of a sentence because it has “gained an impression of a defendant from the entirety of the proceedings.” United States v. Fleming, 397 F.3d 95, 100 (2d Cir.2005). Barresi’s sentence was not unreasonable. See United States v. Pelensky, 129 F.3d 63 (2d Cir.1997) (affirming a three-year sentence in similar circumstances).

We therefore affirm the judgment of the district court.