Case ID: f-appx_122/html/0678-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Herbert SLATER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. John W. BLEDSOE, III, Esquire, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 04-7793.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 24, 2005.
    Decided March 8, 2005.
    Herbert Slater, Appellant pro se.
    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Herbert Slater appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Slater’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Slater v. Bledsoe, No. CA-04-21949-3-13BC (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED