Case ID: ga-app_32/html/0770-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

15668.
    Denny & Co. v. Gunn.
    Decided October 7, 1924.
    Complaint; from city court of Houston county — Judge Eiley. May 10, 1934.
    
      Brown & Brown, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Duncan & Nunn, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

1. As far as they present any questions in such manner as requires a consideration by this court, there is no merit in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

2. In the brief of the plaintiff in error the general grounds of the motion for a new trial are not insisted upon; and the court committed no error when it overruled the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.