Case ID: so2d_642/html/0851-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lorraine HESSLER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Hessler, Appellant, v. T & N, PLC, f/k/a Turner & Newall, pic, Appellee.
    No. 93-2834.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 5, 1994.
    David M. Lipman and Daniel A. Brown, Miami, for appellant.
    Spohrer Wilner & Maxwell and Norwood S. Wilner, Jacksonville, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The appellant has failed to demonstrate error or abuse of discretion in (a) the trial court’s exclusion of proposed rebuttal testimony, see Rhodes v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co., 528 So.2d 459 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Driscoll v. Morris, 114 So.2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959), or (b) any ruling as to the elements of the plaintiff’s strict liability claim. See Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 761 F.2d 1129 (5th Cir.1985).

Affirmed.