Case ID: sw3d_14/html/0187-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

POLYTECH, INC., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. RABBITT, PITZER & SNODGRASS, P.C., Defendants/Respondents.
    No. ED 76446
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
    Feb. 8, 2000.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 14, 2000.
    Application for Transfer Denied April 25, 2000.
    Isidore I. Lamke, Washington, for appellant.
    Gerard T. Noce, Hilary R. Huffman, St. Louis, for respondents.
    Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing with prejudice plaintiffs’ malpractice action. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).