Case ID: njl_112/html/0241-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

AGNES J. BADER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Submitted October 27, 1933
    Decided January 5, 1934.
    
      For the appellant, William Charlton.
    
    For the respondent, Carr & Carroll (Walter B. Carroll, of counsel).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Heher, Perskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.