Case ID: so2d_963/html/0283-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert L. PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D07-2522.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Aug. 1, 2007.
    Robert L. Phillips, Raiford, pro se.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed, without reference to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), a motion simply titled “Motion to Define or Clarify.” The trial court treated the motion as a rule 3.800(c) motion and denied it on the merits. We dismiss the appeal as a non-appealable order. See State v. Woodard, 866 So.2d 120 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Grosse v. State, 511 So.2d 688 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

KLEIN, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.