Case ID: so2d_638/html/0200-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Albert COOPER and Tivan Johnson, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 93-933, 93-932.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 21, 1994.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Robert Finlay and Neil Rose, Sp. Asst. Public Defenders, for appellants.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Linda S. Katz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

No reversible error has been demonstrated in the trial proceedings which culminated in the convictions entered below. Specifically, we find no deficiency in the standard Miranda rights form utilized by the Metro-Dade Police Department, see California v. Prysock, 453 U.S. 355, 101 S.Ct. 2806, 69 L.Ed.2d 696 (1981), and that, in the light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, any arguable error in the admission of evidence or the argument of the prosecutor was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). We do agree that the formal judgments entered against the defendants should be corrected to reflect that the charges contained in count V were dismissed on motion of the state.

Affirmed as modified.