Case ID: nj-eq_84/html/0508-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Adam R. Sloan, receiver, &c., petitioner-appellant, v. Henry Paul et al., respondents and appellees.
    [Submitted March 22d, 1915.
    Decided June 14th, 1915.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning, whose opinion is reported ante p. 321, sub noin. The Railway Review et al. v. Groff Drill and Machine Tool Co.
    
    
      Messrs. Ott & Carr, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. F. Morse Archer and Mr. Harrison H. Voorhees, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion tiled in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Vredenburgh, White, Terhune, Heppenheimer, Williams —14.

For reversal — None.