Case ID: f2d_124/html/0397-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. MICHIGAN SILICA COMPANY, Respondent.
    No. 8721.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
    Dec. 9, 1941.
    Samuel O. Clark, Jr., J. P. Wenchel, Sewall Key, Charles E. Lowery, and Edward First, all of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
    R. M. O’Hara, of Detroit, Mich., for respondent.
    Before HAMILTON, MARTIN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and it appearing that the provisions of respondent’s . contract, herein concerned, expressly deal with the disposition of the gross income of respondent and, therefore, necessarily deal with the disposition of the earnings and profits within the taxable year, as required for credit on undistributed profts tax under Section 26(c) (2), of the Revenue Act of 1936, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order of the Board of Tax Appeals, 41 B.T.A. 511, be and the same is hereby affirmed. See Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Strong Manufacturing Company, 6 Cir., 124 F.2d 360, this day decided.