Case ID: f-appx_462/html/0319-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Millard Burton HARMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David A. BUNCH; Kenneth Droddy, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 11-1748.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 9, 2012.
    Decided: Jan. 24, 2012.
    Scott Gregory Crowley, Sr., Crowley & Crowley, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. William F. Etherington, Leslie A. Winneberger, Beale, Davidson, Ethering-ton & Morris, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Millard Burton Harman appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Appellees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harman v. Bunch, No. 3:10-cv-00759-JRS-DWD, 2011 WL 2441678 (E.D.Va. June 16, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.