Case ID: sw3d_449/html/0790-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard Gary DEKRUYFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    WD 76703
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    ORDER FILED: November 25, 2014
    S. Kathleen (Kate) Webber, Assistant Appellate Defender Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant,
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.
    Before Division Three: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, and Cynthia L. Martin and Gary D. Witt, Judges
   Order

Per Curiam:

Richard Dekruyff appeals, following an evidentiary hearing, the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Dekruyff claims that plea counsel provided ineffective assistance by: (1) failing to intervene when the court granted Dekruyff additional time to plead guilty; and (2) failing to inform both Dekruyff and the court that if Dekruyff did not plead guilty at that time, the State’s plea offer would expire. Because Dekruyffs claims on appeal differ from those raised before the motion court, they are not preserved. We affirm the motion court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b).