Case ID: f-appx_51/html/0778-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Luis VASQUEZ-PULIDO, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 01-10240.
    D.C. No. CR-00-00520-SMM.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted Dec. 2, 2002.
    
    Decided Dec. 5, 2002.
    Before GOODWIN, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jose Luis Vasquez-Pulido appeals his 52-month sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Vasquez-Pulido’s counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Counsel has identified several potential appellate issues, none of which we find availing in light of the appeal waiver in Vasquez-Pulido’s plea agreement. Our examination of the briefs and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), indicates that Vasquez-Pulido knowingly and voluntarily waived his statutory right to appeal, and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement. Accordingly, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1183 (9th Cir.2000).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.