Case ID: njl_103/html/0500-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JAMES R. NUGENT, APPELLANT, v. JOHN H. SCOTT ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Submitted October 29, 1926
    Decided January 31, 1927.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N. J. Mis. R. 649.
    For the appellant, James B. Nugent.
    
    For the respondents, Herbert Boggs and John Francis Cahill.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.