Case ID: so2d_166/html/0142-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Leroy BARBER, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Clark & Clark and the Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Respondents.
    No. 33075.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    July 10, 1964.
    James T. Earle and Masterson & Lloyd, St. Petersburg, for petitioner.
    E. O. Palermo of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos & Evans, Tampa, for Qark and Clark and The Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York.
    Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon a consideration of the record, briefs and after oral argument, we have concluded that the Florida Industrial Commission committed no- error in remanding the matter to the Deputy Commissioner for a reexamination of the extent of the petitioner’s permanent disability. The writ of certiorari is, therefore, denied.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.