Case ID: so2d_369/html/0105-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lillian Lee MARICONDA, Appellant, v. Erwin A. PETRUSER, a/k/a Erwin Petrusek, and Betty Petruser, a/k/a Betty Petrusek, and Continental Insurance Company, Appellees.
    No. 78-1336.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 3, 1979.
    Hodges, Gossett, Weiss, McDonald & Wakefield and Perry W. Hodges, Jr., Hollywood, for appellant.
    Corlett, Merritt, Killian & Sikes and Gerald E. Rosser, Miami, for appellees.
    Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HUB-BART, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Two points are presented on this appeal, one being procedural and the other going to the substantive basis for the final judgment entered. The procedural point does not present reversible error under the principles stated in Marsh v. Sarasota County, 97 So.2d 312 (Fla. 2d DCA 1957). Having passed the procedural question, an examination of the record reveals that the judgment is adequately supported by the evidence presented.

Affirmed.