Case ID: f2d_122/html/0959-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Albert E. WIER, Appellant, v. Conway P. COE, Com’r of Patents.
    No. 7719.
    United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
    Sept. 29, 1941.
    Jennings Bailey, Jr., and Hugo Huettig, Jr., both of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
    W. W. Cochran,, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
    Before GRONER, Chief Justice, and MILLER and VINSON, Associate Justices.
   PER CURIAM.

We agree with the Patent Office and the District Court, 33 F.Supp. 142, that the disclosures of appellant’s application fail to reveal anything approaching the dignity of invention.

Affirmed.