Case ID: neb_154/html/0872-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Messmore, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Christine Shipley, appellant, v. Joseph Shipley, appellee.
    50 N. W. 2d 103
    Filed November 23, 1951.
    No. 33033.
    
      Burbridge & Burbridge, for appellant.
    
      Frost, Peasinger & Meyers, for appellee.
    Heard before Simmons, C. J., ' Carter, Messmore, Yeager, Chappell, Wenke, and Boslaugh, JJ.
   Messmore, J.

The plaintiff filed a petition in the district court to modify a decree of divorce. The defendant, cross-petitioner, demurred to the petition. The demurrer was sustained. The plaintiff appeals.

The ruling on the demurrer was not followed by a judgment of dismissal nor any order showing final disposition of the case.

In Larson v. Sloan, 77 Neb. 438, 109 N. W. 752, this court held: “An order sustaining a general demurrer to a petition, not followed by a judgment of dismissal or other final disposition of the case, is not a final order or judgment, and is not reviewable in this court.” See, also, Miller v. B. & M. R. R. Co., 7 Neb. 227; State ex rel. Sorensen v. State Bank of Omaha, 131 Neb. 223, 267 N. W. 532; Cozad Ditch Co. v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation Dist., 132 Neb. 547, 272 N. W. 560; State ex rel. Johnson v. Consumers Public Power Dist., 142 Neb. 114, 5 N. W. 2d 202; § 25-1902, R. R. S. 1943.

For the reason given herein, the plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.