Case ID: ohio-law-abs_6/html/0484-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MATRE v. MATRE et.
    Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist., Hamilton Co.
    No. 3150.
    Decided Mar. 5, 1928.
    First Publication of This Opinion.
    Syllabus by Editorial Staff.
    615. HUSBAND & WIFE.
    Rule of community of interest of husband and wife in personal property unknown to Ohio law.
    Error to Common Pleas.
    Judgment affirmed.
    Thos. L. Michie, Judson A. Shuey, and Albert R. Hoffman, Cincinnati, for plaintiff in error.
    Franks & Franks, and Gardner, Freking & Overbade, Cincinnati, for defendant in error.
   FULL TEXT.

PER CURIAM.

Under the facts of this case, to grant the relief sought would, in effect, require the adoption of a rule of community interest of the husband and wife in personal property. Such a doctrine is unknown to the Ohio law.

The separate findings of fact by the trial court are sustained by the evidence, and the conclusion of law, based on those findings, is correct.'

The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas is affirmed.

(Hamilton, PJ., Mills and Cushing, JJ., concur.)