Case ID: njl_83/html/0780-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MARY BENZ, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted July 8, 1912
    Decided November 18, 1912.
    Qn error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion 'is reported in 53 Vroom 197.
    Por the plaintiff in error, Samuel Kalisch, Jr.
    
    Por the defendant in error, George Holmes.
    
   Per Curiam.

■ The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Garrison in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Voorhees, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, Wi-itte, Treaoy, JJ. 12.

For reversal — -None.