Case ID: sw3d_505/html/0433-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Kenneth M. BUCKHOLZ, Appellant.
    WD 79334
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    ORDER FILED: December 13, 2016
    Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent
    Kenneth M. Buckholz, Appellant Pro Se
    Before Division One: Anthony Rex Gabbert, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, and Alok Ahuja,
   ORDER

Per Curiam:

Kenneth Buckholz (“Buckholz”) appeals the trial court’s decision to deny his 29.07(d) motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Buckholz argues that the trial court erred in denying his 29.07(d) motion because the plea was entered unknowingly and involuntarily in that the plea trial court breached the plea agreement by never stating whether it would or would not accept the agreement, but instead sentenced the appellant to more time than was agreed to by Buckholz and the State. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).