Case ID: so2d_666/html/1016-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Josephius POLLOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 94-3984.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Jan. 23, 1996.
    Appellant pro se.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Terry Carley, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; James W. Rogers, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm without discussion appellant’s conviction and sentence. However, we strike from the judgment the requirement that appellant pay $27.50 in court costs, listed on the line identified as “Other,” because no statutory authority is cited to support such a cost award, and no explanation is provided as to what this cost represents. On remand, the trial court may reimpose such cost, provided that a legal basis for its imposition is recited. E.g., Bradshaw v. State, 638 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 1st DCA1994).

WEBSTER, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.