Case ID: so2d_621/html/1093-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary Jeaninth ANTULICH, Appellant, v. ANCHOR HOCKING CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, et al., Appellee.
    No. 93-103.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Aug. 10, 1993.
    Ronald C. Pathman, Miami, for appellant.
    Nelson and Tacher and Robert Tacher, Miami, for appellee.
    Before FERGUSON, JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

In view of the fact that the record reflects the existence of a disputed issue of material fact concerning the design and manufacture of the package in question, the entry of a summary judgment by the trial court in this case was error. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Baad v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford, 606 So.2d 451 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

Reversed and remanded.