Case ID: f3d_897/html/1224-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC.; Planned Parenthood: Shasta-Diablo, Inc., DBA Planned Parenthood Northern California ; Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, Inc.; Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest; Planned Parenthood Los Angeles; Planned Parenthood/Orange and San Bernardino Counties, Inc.; Planned Parenthood of Santa Barbara, Ventura and San Luis Obispo Counties, Inc. ; Planned Parenthood Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley, Inc.; Planned Parenthood Center for Choice; Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains; Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS; Biomax Procurement Services, LLC; David Daleiden, AKA Robert Daoud Sarkis; Sandra Susan Merritt, AKA Susan Tennenbaum; Gerardo Adrian Lopez, Defendants-Appellants, and Troy Newman; Phillip S. Cronin; Albin Rhomberg, Defendants.
    No. 16-16997
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Filed August 1, 2018
    ORDER
   The concurrence opinion in the above-captioned matter filed on May 16, 2018, and published at 890 F.3d 828, is amended as follows:

At opinion page 838, delete the sentence: < I respectfully suggest that we should take this opportunity to fix this error in our court's precedent with a call of the case en banc.>

And replace the deleted sentence with: < Although the propriety of interlocutory appeals for denials of anti-SLAPP motions was not briefed by the parties in this case, I respectfully suggest that we take the opportunity to fix this error in the future.>

The Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc remains pending.

IT IS SO ORDERED.