Case ID: or_128/html/0414-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued January 30,
    affirmed February 5,
    rehearing denied February 26, 1929.
    NILS PAULSON et Ux. v. FRED H. HENRICI et Ux.
    (274 Pac. 313.)
    For appellants there was a brief over the names of Mr. W. L. Mulvey and Mr. B. F. Lindas.
    
    For respondents there was a brief over the name of Messrs. Clark, Bkulason & Clark, with an oral argument by Mr. A. E. Clark.
    
   PER CURIAM.

This is a suit to restrain a continuing trespass to real property. The transcript of evidence is not here. The complaint unquestionably states a cause of suit. There is, therefore, no question which we can review. It follows that the decree of the lower court in favor of plaintiffs is affirmed.

Affirmed.