Case ID: nj-super_120/html/0469-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MATTHEW J. HALE, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
    Submitted September 11, 1972
    Decided September 19, 1972.
    .Before Judges Coldestek, Leonabd and Halpebn.
    
      
      Mr. George H. Barbour, attorney for appellant.
    
      Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney. General of New Jersey, attorney for respondent (Mr. Fred H. Eumpf, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons expressed by Judge Martino, 116 N. J. Super. 106 (Law Div. 1971).