Case ID: ga_163/html/0835-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Brown v. Weathers et al., commissioners, et al.
    
    Appeal and Error, 4 C. J. p. 1122, n. 35.
    No. 5581.
    February 24, 1927.
    Petition for mandamus. Before Judge Maddox. Fioyd superior court. July 13, 1926.
    
      M. B. Súbanles, for plaintiff.
    
      Paul II. Doyal, for defendants.
   Pee Curiam.

This case came before a full bench of six Justices, the question being whether the judgment of the superior court refusing to grant a mandamus absolute was error. On that question the Justices are equally divided in opinion, Russell, C. J., Beck, P. J., and Gilbert, J., being of the opinion that the court did not err, and Atkinson, Hill, and Hines, JJ., being of the contrary opinion; and the judgment of the trial court stands affirmed by operation of law. Judgment affirmed.