Case ID: so2d_447/html/0228-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Diane Joy SAUGSTAD, Appellant, v. VICKY’S CAR CITY, INC., and Steven Jerry Glauser, Appellees.
    No. 82-2692.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    July 1, 1983.
    Paul F. Probst, Jr., of Larson, Conklin, Stanley & Probst, P.A., Belleair Bluffs, for appellant.
    Guillermo A. Ruiz, St. Petersburg, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

As to the dismissal of Count II of appellant’s complaint, we cannot find that the argument raised by appellant was preserved for appeal. In any event, as to both Count I and Count II, there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the trial court’s determinations, which are entitled to a presumption of correctness. Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977).

AFFIRMED.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and SCHOON-OVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.