Case ID: misc_16/html/0686-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "McCarthy, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CITY COURT OF NEW YORK—GENERAL TERM,
    APRIL, 1896.
    Morris Pollatschek et al., Respondents, v. Matilda E. Goodwin, Appellant.
    ' Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiffs.
    Theodore L. Frothingham, for appellant. ■ ■
    Hoffman & Hoffman, for respondents.
   McCarthy, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for broker’s commission against the seller on an exchange of certain real estate and other properties. ' '

The judge’s charge being omitted, we must accept that the case was fairly and properly submitted to the jury.

It was a question of fact, and we cannot disturb their verdict unless for some error of law.

After a careful examination of the points suggested by the appellant we do not find any substantial error requiring a reversal.

Judgment must, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

Van Wyck, Ch. J., and Fitzsimons, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.