Case ID: nys_75/html/1128-08.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LICHTENSTEIN, Appellant, v. RABOLINSKI, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    March 18, 1902.)
    Action by Meyer Lichtenstein against Harry Rabolinski.
   PER CURIAM.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs, but without prejudice to the right to renew the motion at the opening of the next term of this court, in case of failure to exercise due diligence in procuring the case and exceptions herein to be settled and filed, and the printed papers filed and served.