Case ID: fla_123/html/0001-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frank Benefield v. State.
    165 So. 897.
    Division B.
    Opinion Filed February 20, 1936.
    
      Clyde R. Brown, for Plaintiff in Error;
    
      Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant, for the State.
   Per Curiam.

The writ of error brings for review j’udgment of conviction of the offense of breaking and entering a building with intent to commit a felony, to-wit, with the intent to commit grand larceny.

The only question presented for our determination is whether or not there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict and as the record discloses ample substantial evidence to support the verdict and j'udgment, the j'udgment should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Whitfield, C. J., and Davis, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.