Case ID: ny_148/html/0763-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nathan R. Curtis, Respondent, v. The President, Managers and Company of the Delaware and Hudson Canal Company, Appellant.
    Mem. of decision below, 76 Hun, 610.
    (Argued February 27, 1896;
    decided March 13, 1896.)
    Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made February 13, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
    
      Lewis L. Garr for appellant.
    
      James W. Virbeek for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

All concur, except Andrews, Oh. J., not sitting, and Gray,. J., not voting.