Case ID: sw3d_112/html/0117-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dennis HYMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 62216.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Aug. 12, 2003.
    
      Ruth Sanders, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
    Joel A. Block, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Chief Judge, PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Hyman appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).