Case ID: nj-eq_69/html/0844-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

United New Jersey Railroad and Canal Company et al., appellants, v. William McCully et al., respondents.
    [Argued June 27th, 28th, 1905.
    Decided June 18th, 1906.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by yice-Ohancellor Bergen, whose opinion is reported in 68 N. J. Eq. M2.
    
    
      Mr. Alan II. Strong, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. George T. Parrot, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree in this case is affirmed for the reasons contained in the opinion delivered in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Bergen.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Fort, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredeneurgii, yROOM^ Gray —10.

For reversal—None.