Case ID: so2d_253/html/0457-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James Otis YOUNGBLOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1124.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Oct. 26, 1971.
    Fred S. Schmunk, Jr., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, James T. Carlisle and Charles W. Mus-grove, Asst. Attys. Gen., Vero Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We have examined appellant’s points on appeal and considered the record and legal arguments and find same to be without merit and not such as to constitute reversible error.

Affirmed.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.