Case ID: cust-ct_3/html/0432-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dallinger, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 42392.
    Protests 413056-G, etc., of Saks & Co. (New York).
   Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel bottles, atomizers, photo frames, cocktail shakers, cups, shakers, jars, boxes, and tantalus set (liquor set) chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 47857), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.