Case ID: so2d_487/html/0031-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dallas G. DIXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 85-652.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Dec. 26, 1985.
    Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied May 7, 1986.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Anthony Calvello, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Richard G. Bartmon, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm. the judgment and sentence except as to the assessment of costs. While there is some uncertainty whether contemporaneous objection was required to preserve the primary issue herein for appeal, the trial court did not err. See State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985).

As to the trial court’s assessment of costs, we remand with direction to provide appellant the opportunity to object to the assessment prior to reassessment thereof, if any. See Lawson v. State, 470 So.2d 109 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

GLICKSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., Associate Judge (Retired), concur.