Case ID: sw2d_926/html/0948-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROOSEVELT BANK, Respondent, v. Larry D. LUMLEY and Karen A. Lumley, Appellants.
    No. 69332.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Aug. 20, 1996.
    Appellants pro se.
    Gregory F. Hoffmann, Millar, Schaefer, Hoffmann & Robertson, St. Louis, for respondent. .
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Larry D. Lumley and Karen A. Lumley, appeal the judgment sustaining respondent’s, Roosevelt Bank’s, motion for summary judgment on its action to recover the balance due on two promissory notes. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find no error. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.1603).