Case ID: misc2d_35/html/0164-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Esther Zalaznick, Appellant, v. Arthur Imbembo, Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    June 14, 1962.
    
      
      Abraham J. Tasgour for appellant.
   Per Curiam.

Where the landlord has presented irrefutable proof that tenant violated a substantial obligation of his tenancy by repeated and unjustified refusal to pay his rent when due, which necessitated 13 separate dispossess proceedings over a period of 21 months, a final order in favor of the landlord should have been granted. (See 974 Realty Corp. v. Ledford, 9 Misc 2d 240; Gilbert v. Becker, 142 N. Y. S. 2d 888; Stern v. Harrold, 12 Misc 2d 73; Rental Realty Corp. v. Lawrence, 14 Misc 2d 1070; Stern v. Carroll, 28 Misc 2d 507.)

The final order in favor of tenant should be reversed, with $30 costs and final order directed in favor of landlord, as prayed for in the petition, with costs.

Concur — Hecht, J. P., Hoestadtbr and Tilzer, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.