Case ID: sw2d_890/html/0417-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gerald W. BEREUTER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. 65850.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Jan. 10, 1995.
    
      Gerald W. Bereuter, pro se.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his “Motion to Correct Sentence by Order Nunc Pro Tunc”. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).