Case ID: ga_132/html/0698-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Atkinson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lee v. McCarty et al.
    
    Argued January 22,
    Decided June 17, 1909.
    Complaint for land. Before Judge Felton. Crawford superior court. July G, 1908.
    
      B. L. Rodgers, for plaintiff.
    
      II. A. Mathews, for defendants.
   Atkinson, J.

1. The undisputed evidence required a finding for the defendant ; and if there were any errors in some of the rulings of the court or inaccuracies in the charge, they were not such as to necessitate a new trial.

2. Sufficient foundation was laid as to the loss of the deed under which defendant prescribed, to adinit secondary evidence thereof.

3. A refusal to allow an amendment to a petition and sustaining a demurrer thereto furnishes no ground for a motion for a new trial. Turner v. Barber, 131 Ga. 444 (62 S. E. 587); Hawkins v. Studdard, 132 Ga. 262 (63 S. E. 852); Leathers v. Leathers, 132 Ga. 211 (63 S. E. 1118).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.