Case ID: so2d_409/html/0200-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Rogelio VELOSO, Appellee.
    No. 81-825.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Feb. 2, 1982.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Calianne P. Lantz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
    Weiner, Robbins, Tunkey & Ross and Geoffrey C. Fleck, Miami, for appellee.
    Before HUBBART, C. J., and BARK-DULL and BASKIN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The order granting the motion to dismiss the information in the trial court is reversed upon the reasoning found in the recent Supreme Court opinion of Ensor v. State, 403 So.2d 349 (Fla.1981). The order granting the motion to suppress is also reversed, in accordance with the stipulation made in the trial court.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings. 
      
      . It is noted that this decision was rendered subsequent to the principal order under review in the case sub judice.