Case ID: ark_364/html/0271-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam. Tom Glaze, Justice,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eric Randall NANCE v. STATE of Arkansas
    CR 99-365
    217 S.W.3d 850
    Supreme Court of Arkansas
    Opinion delivered November 28, 2005
    
      Jennifer Horan, Federal Public Defender, by; Bruce D. Eddy, Julie Brain, and Rebecca Blaskey, Ass’t Federal Public Defenders, for appellant.
    
      
      Craig Lambert, for appellant.
    
      Mike Beebe, Att’y Gen., by: Kelly Hill, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

The application for permission to appear as counsel on behalf of petitioner, Eric Randall Nance, is denied. In the alternative, even if we were to grant the application, the motion for stay of execution is denied.

Tom Glaze, Justice,

concuning. I would deny the motion for application of permission to appear as counsel, but alternatively concur with the court’s decision to deny the motion for stay of execution for the reasons set forth by the State in its brief in response to the motion for stay of execution.