Case ID: so2d_830/html/0205-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kirk A. CANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 5D02-829.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Nov. 8, 2002.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and George D.E. Burden, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
    Kirk A. Cano, Gainesville, pro se.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Kirk Cano, appeals the summary denial of his second rule 3.850 motion. We affirm the trial court’s denial of the motion as successive. See Pope v. State, 702 So.2d 221 (Fla.1997). However, the affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant filing a proper rale 3.800(a) motion challenging his prison releasee reoffender sentence. See Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000).

AFFIRMED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

HARRIS, GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.