Case ID: nj_32/html/0277-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FLUORO ELECTRIC CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SMITH TRANSPORT LIMITED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued April 25, 1960
    Decided May 9, 1960.
    
      Mr. Jerome S. Lieb argued the cause for the defendant-appellant (Messrs. Earlcavy & Lieb, attorneys).
    
      Mr. Arthur Slavitt argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent.
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Conford in the court below.

Burling, J., concurring in result.

For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Burling, Jacobs, Prancis, Proctor, Hall and Schettino—7.

For reversal—Hone.