Case ID: so2d_148/html/0731-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

D. A. D., INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. CALI, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.
    No. 62-451.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    Jan. 22, 1963.
    Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1963.
    E. O. Denison, Fort Pierce, for appellant.
    W. F. Esslinger and Nestor Morales, Miami, for appellee.
    Before PEARSON, TILLMAN, C. J., and HORTON and HENDRY, TT.
   PER CURIAM.

The question presented by this appeal is whether the chancellor erred when he found that the forfeiture of the security deposit under the hotel lease involved was a penalty rather than liquidated damages. The decree is affirmed upon authority of Stenor, Inc. v. Lester, Fla.1951, 58 So.2d 673; Kanter v. Safran, Fla.1953, 68 So.2d 553; Pappas v. Deringer, Fla.App.1962, 145 So.2d 770.

Affirmed.