Case ID: f-appx_31/html/0808-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anthony S. COLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARAMARK, Employ Food and Food Service Workers for Henrico County Jail, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 01-7828.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 26, 2002.
    Decided March 11, 2002.
    
      Anthony S. Coleman, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Anthony Coleman, an inmate at the Henrico County, Virginia, Jail, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.2001). Coleman alleged in his complaint that he occasionally received incomplete meals or meals that contained items that were not on his medically prescribed soft diet. We assume without deciding that ARAMARK acted under color of state law for purposes of § 1983 by performing the traditional governmental function of providing food service at the Jail. See West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 54-56, 108 S.Ct. 2250, 101 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988). However, our review of the record discloses that Coleman alleged no significant injury as a result of receiving incomplete or incorrect meals. See Strickler v. Waters, 989 F.2d 1375, 1380-81 (4th Cir.1993). We therefore agree with the district court that Coleman failed to state a claim under § 1983 and find that this appeal is frivolous. We dispense with oral argument and dismiss the appeal because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before us and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.