Case ID: f-appx_66/html/0522-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David J. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of NORTH CAROLINA; Wake County; Robert L. Farmer, Presiding Judge of Wake County; District Attorney, of Wake County; Roy Cooper, Attorney General of North Carolina, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 03-6524.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted June 12, 2003.
    Decided June 18, 2003.
    David J. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

David J. Williams appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find nó reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. North Carolina, No. CA-03-182-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.