Case ID: f-appx_30/html/0272-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Leonard Thomas WITT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 01-7376.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted March 4, 2002.
    Decided March 18, 2002.
    Leonard Thomas Witt, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Leonard Thomas Witt seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Witt v. Angelone, No. CA-01-271-AM (E.D.Va. Aug. 9, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.