Case ID: njl_123/html/0201-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROSE DROTAR ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Argued May 24, 1939
    Decided September 22, 1939.
    For the appellants, Kenneth J. Dawes.
    
    For the respondents, John A. Hartpence and B. Thorn Lord.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker, in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Hone.