Case ID: f-appx_59/html/0944-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael Allan DUNN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James NOE; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 02-16849.
    D.C. No. CV-02-00043-MJJ.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted March 10, 2003.
    
    Decided March 19, 2003.
    Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

California state prisoner Michael Allan Dunn appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging defendants improperly seized materials from Dunn’s property without a hearing in 1993. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Johnson v. California, 207 F.3d 650, 653 (9th Cir.2000) (per curiam), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Dunn’s action as time-barred because all of the allegations stem from incidents occuring on or about March 12, 1993, and Dunn did not file his complaint until January 3, 2002. See id.; Cal. Civ. Pro.Code § 352.1.

Dunn’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.