Case ID: ad2d_23/html/0576-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harry Gold, Appellant, v. Surface Transit, Inc., et al., Respondents.
   'In a negligence action, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered February 11, 1964 after a jury trial, upon the court’s direction of a verdict in favor of the defendants. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur; Benjamin, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to grant a new trial on the ground: (1) that, under all the circumstances, issues of fact were presented as to the defendants’ negligence and as to the plaintiff’s contributory negligence; and (2) that such issues should have been submitted to the jury for its determination.