Case ID: nj-eq_102/html/0330-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert H. Armstrong, respondent, v. Bertha Louise Armstrong, appellant.
    [Decided February 6th, 1928.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.
    
      Mr. Edmund A. Hayes, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. Winfield 8. Angleman, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, and reported in 99 N. J. Eq. 19.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Jus,tice, Trenchaed, Parker, Minturn, EIalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Camebell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.