Case ID: or_246/html/0280-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued March 8,
    affirmed March 15, 1967
    STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROOSEVELT JENKINS, Appellant.
    
    424 P. 2d 894
    
      Oscar D. Eowlett, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.
    
      Jacob B. Tamer, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, Portland.
    Before McAllister, J., Presiding, and O’Connell, Goodwin and Fort, Justices.
   PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a burglary conviction, contending that the court erred in excluding certain evidence.

No offer of proof was made and consequently, even if the evidence was admissible, we have no way of determining whether the exclusion of the evidence was prejudicial to defendant.

The judgment is affirmed.