Case ID: f-appx_23/html/0077-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Steven McINTOSH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
    Docket No. 01-7481.
    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    Dec. 20, 2001.
    Steven McIntosh, pro se, Queens Village, NY, for Appellant.
    Mary K. Schuette, (Barbara Jane Carey, on the brief), New York, NY, for Appellee.
    Present CABRANES, STRAUB and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
   SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and hereby is AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff Steven McIntosh appeals from the District Court’s May 22, 2001 order denying his motion for sanctions and to vacate a settlement agreement. The order was entered on March 23, 2001, and this timely appeal followed.

Before the District Court, plaintiff brought a motion to “(1) impose sanctions upon Consolidated Edison ... for breach of the Settlement Agreement so ordered by [the District Court] on April 30, 1997 ... whereby Mr. McIntosh released his Title VII claims against [Consolidated] Edison, and (2) vacate the Settlement Agreement.” McIntosh v. Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc., No. 96-3624, slip op. at 1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 23, 2001). The District Court denied the motion, finding that “[b]oth claims [were] wholly frivolous and duplicative of issues already fully litigated.” Id.

Plaintiff raises the same issues on appeal.

We affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the District Court in its March 22, 2001 Order.

For the reasons set forth above, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.