Case ID: f2d_784/html/1061-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BY THE COURT:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frederick J. WOLFE and Heather B. Wolfe, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. E.F. HUTTON & COMPANY, INC., and Peter Panos, Defendants-Appellants. Joseph GORMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER AND SMITH, INC., a foreign corporation, Defendant-Appellant, Micah Hollander, Michael Strauss, Defendants.
    Nos. 85-3352, 85-5419.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Feb. 28, 1986.
    Keith Olin, Bennett Falk, Ruden Barnett McClosky Schuster & Russell P.A., Miami, Fla., for defendants-appellants.
    Elmo R. Hoffman, Orlando, Fla., for Wolfe.
    Karen A. Gievers, Anderson Moss Russo Gievers & Cohen, P.A., Miami, Fla., for Gorman.
    ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
    Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, and CLARK, Circuit Judges .
    
      
       Judge Anderson is disqualified and did not participate in this decision.
    
   BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.