Case ID: f-appx_301/html/0742-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Francisca CELAYA-LOPEZ, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 07-50530.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 11, 2008.
    
    Filed Nov. 26, 2008.
    Stephen F. Miller, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Kathryn Thickstun Leff, Law Offices of Kathryn Thickstun Leff, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, KLEINFELD and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Appellant’s sufficiency of evidence challenge fails under the standard set in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). Sufficient evidence supports the district court’s finding that appellant had a reasonable opportunity to escape. See United States v. Verduzco, 373 F.3d 1022, 1030 (9th Cir. 2004).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.