Case ID: f-appx_697/html/0219-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Shon ASHBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, (USCIS); Rex Tillerson, Secretary of State, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 17-1532
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: August 28, 2017
    Decided: September 20, 2017
    Shon Ashby, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey llene Young, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shon Ashby appeals the district court’s' order dismissing his amended complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), (6), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, Ashby v. U.S. Dep’t of State, No. 3:16-cv-00585-FDW-DCK, 2017 WL 1363323 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 2017). To the extent that Ashby seeks to raise a new issue on appeal, we perceive no exceptional circumstances that would allow us to reach such an issue. See Pornomo v. United States, 814 F.3d 681, 686 (4th Cir. 2016). We deny Ashby’s motion to remove Appel-lees’ attorneys and nullify the judgment, motion for return of visa application fees, motion to add additional defendants, and motion for fraud. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED