Case ID: ohio-st_127/html/0402-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gilvary v. Cuyahoga Valley Ry. Co.
    (No. 23947
    Decided October 25, 1933.)
    
      Messrs. Bernsteen & Bernsteen and Mr. J. E. Mathews, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Messrs. Tolies, Hogsett S Ginn, Mr. W. T. Kinder and Mr. Thomas O. Nevison, for defendant in error.
   It appearing that the judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of this ease (one judge not participating) and are for that reason unable to agree upon a judgment, and the entry of that fact constituting an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, it is ordered that said judgment be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Jones, Matthias and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Weygandt, C. J., not participating.