Case ID: br_407/html/1177-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re SILVER STATE HELICOPTERS, LLC. Western Aircraft, Inc., Petitioner, v. James F. Lisowski, Sr., Trustee-Respondent.
    No. 08-80165.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 23, 2009.
    Filed May 28, 2009.
    Matthew C. Zirzow and Gerald M. Gordon, Gordon & Silver Ltd., Las Vegas, Nevada; Jerry Hall, Jr. and Patrick Potter, Pillsbury Wintrop Shaw Pitman LLP, Washington, DC, for the petitioner.
    Victoria Nelson and Ogonna M. Atamoh, Santoro Driggs Walch Kearney Johnson & Thompson, Las Vegas, Nevada, for the trustee-respondent.
    Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judge.
   ORDER

In the instant case, Western Aircraft (“Western”) leased commercial real estate to Silver State Helicopters (“Silver State”). Silver State later filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy relief. After the trustee was appointed, Western demanded that the trustee pay the rent that had accrued under the lease for the first 60 days following Silver State’s filing of the bankruptcy petition. The trustee failed to pay the rent. Western moved the bankruptcy court for an order requiring the rental payment. See 11 U.S.C. § 365(d)(3). The bankruptcy court denied Western’s motion, reasoning that the timing of performance under section 365(d)(3) is within the discretion of the bankruptcy court.

The bankruptcy court has certified for appeal the question whether section 365(d)(3) requires the immediate payment of accrued rent.

Because we conclude the order at issue is fully within the discretion of the bankruptcy court, and resolution of the underlying issue (whether section 365(d)(3) requires the immediate payment of accrued rent) is unlikely to have a substantial impact on the ongoing proceedings, the petition for permission to appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(2) is denied.