Case ID: njl_99/html/0269-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

KATE ARNETT, EXECUTRIX, &c., APPELLANT, v. NEWTON A. K. BUGBEE, STATE COMPTROLLER, RESPONDENT.
    Argued June 27, 1923
    Decided December 4, 1923.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 98 N. J. L. 416.
    For the appellant, Walter F. Hayhurst.
    
    For the respondent, Thomas F. McCran.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Black in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — 'The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenc hard, Parker, Minturn, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskiric, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.