Case ID: sw3d_568/html/0458-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sterling EVANS, Appellant, v. Ann PRECYTHE and Matthew Pierce, Respondents.
    WD 81826
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Filed: January 22, 2019 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 26, 2019
    Sterling M. Evans, Bonne Terre, appellant pro se.
    Peter Houser, Jefferson City for respondents.
    Before Division Two: Alok Ahuja, P.J., and Thomas H. Newton and Mark D. Pfeiffer, JJ.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM:

In May 2014, Appellant Sterling Evans was an inmate at the Farmington Correctional Center. He was investigated for alleged misconduct, which resulted in prison discipline, but no criminal charges. Evans filed a petition for expungement of the records of the prison misconduct investigation pursuant to § 610.122, RSMo. The circuit court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, because Evans did not seek expungement of the sort of "records of arrest" addressed in § 610.122, RSMo, and because he was ineligible for expungement because he had been previously convicted of a felony. Evans appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).