Case ID: f-appx_373/html/0362-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Justin HAWKINS, a/k/a Main, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-8056.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 1, 2010.
    Decided: April 12, 2010.
    Justin Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
    Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Justin Hawkins appeals the district court’s order granting his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), which sought a reduction in sentence based upon the amendments to the crack cocaine sentencing guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Hawkins, No. 5:98-cr-00016-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. filed Oct. 30, 2009 & entered Nov. 1, 2009). We deny Hawkins’ motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.