Case ID: okla-crim_35/html/0382-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte WILL CRAWFORD.
    No. A-.
    Opinion Filed Dec. 3, 1910.
    (112 Pac. 41.)
    W. A. Huser and W. T. Banks, for petitioner.
    Fred S. Caldwell and J. C. Wright, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Will Crawford, the petitioner, being imprisoned under a judgment of the county court of Ok-fuskee county for a violation of the prohibition law, has applied to this court for a writ of habeas corpus to the end that he be discharged.

His contention is that the county court was without jurisdiction to try him, and that the judgment of conviction rendered against him is void, for the reason that the information upon which the prosecution was based was not verified.

This ease presents the same question just determined by this court in case No. A-817, Ex parte Tom Talley, 4 Okla. Cr. 398, 112 Pac. 36, and decision in that case is controlling here.

The writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued herein will therefore be discharged and the petitioner will be remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Okfuskee county, with directions to execute the judgment of the county court.