Case ID: sw2d_965/html/0325-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anthony SANFORD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. 71681.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Feb. 17, 1998.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 20, 1998.
    Application for Transfer Denied May 26, 1998.
    S. Paige Canfield, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for movant-appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Seth A. Albin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Sanford, movant, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).