Case ID: sw_151/html/1051-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PRENDERGAST, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHESTER v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Dec. 11, 1912.)
    Criminal Law (§ 1097*) — Afpeal—Necessity of Statement of Facts.
    Questions attempted to be raised by motion for new trial cannot be considered without a statement of facts.
    [Ed. Note. — For other eases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2862, 2864, 2926, 2934, 2938, 2939, 2941, 2942, 2947;. Dee. Dig. § 1097.*]
    Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; Robt. B. Seay, Judge.
    Roy Chester was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    O. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   PRENDERGAST, J.

The appellant was indicted by proper indictment for burglary, and under a correct charge was convicted.

There is neither bills of exceptions nor statement of facts. The questions attempted to be raised by the motion for new trial cannot be considered without a statement of facts.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.