Case ID: pa_611/html/0619-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

29 A.3d 368
    COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Darius PETERSON, Petitioner.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Sept. 21, 2011.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of September, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Is the Superior Court’s decision denying Petitioner’s Rule 600 claim directly contrary to well-settled precedent established by this Court?