Case ID: f-appx_11/html/0102-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William M. WRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY, Warden; Officers, S.R.T. (7-3 Shift) Staff; S.R.T. Sergeant Johnson; D. Johnson, C.O. II (Division of Correction), M.H.C.-X, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 00-7762.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted March 30, 2001.
    Decided April 9, 2001.
    William M. Wray, pro se. Gloria Wilson Shelton, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.
    Before WILLIAMS and DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

William M. Wray appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. ■ Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wray v. Conroy, No. CA-00-1348-PJM (D.Md. Nov. 16, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.