Case ID: nj-eq_109/html/0134-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Helena M. Nugent, respondent, v. Stuart Lindsley, appellant.
    [Decided October 19th, 1931.]
    
      Mr. Joseph L. Smith, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. Herbert Boggs, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 100 N. J. Eq. 87, under the title of James R. Nugent v. Stuart Lindsley.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Camrbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, ECeteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.