Case ID: so3d_21/html/0045-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Steve URSI, Petitioner, v. Gina URSI, Respondent.
    No. 3D09-2501.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Sept. 15, 2009.
    Rehearing Denied Oct. 1, 2009.
    Tracy Belinda Newmark, Hollywood, for petitioner.
    Barry Franklin, for respondent.
    
      Before RAMIREZ, C.J., and LAGOA and SALTER, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Denied. See Ellis v. Henning, 678 So.2d 825, 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (“Without a transcript or sworn factual allegations concerning the context in which the trial judge’s alleged comments arose, we do not find that the allegations in plaintiffs motions to disqualify set forth a legally sufficient ground for recusal.... A trial judge’s expression of dissatisfaction with counsel or a client’s behavior alone does not give rise to a reasonable belief that the trial judge is biased and the client cannot receive a fair trial.”).