Case ID: f2d_199/html/0370-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Jr'c'xs\" i^urv-iívivi.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. Frank KOENIG and Peter Koenig, Trading and Doing Business as Koenig Bros., Appellees.
    No. 11481.
    United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
    Oct. 17, 1952.
    Ogden, Galphin & Abell, Louisville, Ky., ^or appellants.
    C. Maxwell Brown, Louisville, Ky., for appenees
    Before HICKS, ALLEN and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. , . 1
   Jr'c'xs" i^urv-iívivi.

' ■ This cause has been heard on the record and on the briefs and oral arguments of the attorneys for the parties;

And it appearing that, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district judge in overruling a motion for a new trial, no error inhered in the refusal of the district judSe to direct the jury to return a verdict Bor defendants, there being no substantial evidence that the appellees penpetrated any fraud in connection with their claitns for fire losg and damage; ^ ^ ^ coart properly submitted t0 the jury under clear and correct instructions the issue in the case concerning the amount justly recover-able by appellees from the appellant insuranee companies, and that there was substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury upon which the judgment was entered;

And it appearing further that no error is shown in the conduct of the trial by the District Court, its judgment is affirmed; and it is so ordered.