Case ID: sw_158/html/0285-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PRENDERGAST, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SIMON v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    June 11, 1913.)
    Criminal Law (§ 1090*) — Questions Reviewable — Statement off Facts — Bill of Exceptions.
    In the absence of a statement of facts or bill of exceptions, questions raised by a motion for new trial cannot be considered on appeal.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2653, 2789, 2803-2822, 2825-2827, 2927, 2928, 2948, 3204; Dec. Dig. § 1090.*]
    Appeal from District Court, Tarrant County; R. H. Buck, Judge.
    Max Simon was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   PRENDERGAST, J.

Appellant was convicted of burglary under a proper indictment and charge. There is no statement of facts or bill of exception. No question is raised ■by the motion for new trial which we can consider in the absence of a statement of facts and bill of exception.

The judgment is affirmed.