Case ID: ind_4/html/0617-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eastes v. Daubenspeck.
    A bill of exceptions, wbicb does not appear to have been signed by a judge, cannot be noticed.
    ERROR to the Hamilton Circuit Court.
    
      Saturday, December 31.
    
      T. D. and R. L. Walpole, for the plaintiff
    
      S. Yandes, for the defendant.
   Per Curiam.

The bill of exceptions in this case, or what purports to be such, does not appear to be signed by any judge. The errors complained of arise upon no other part of the record.

We cannot take any notice of the contents of the alleged bill of exceptions in the absence of the authentication of a judge’s signature.

The judgment is affirmed, with 10 per cent, damages and costs.