Case ID: ohio-law-abs_7/html/0524-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      HUGHES, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CONTINENTAL SUGAR CO v AGNER
    Ohio Appeals, 3rd Dist, Putnam Co
    No 230.
    Decided April 24, 1929
    Smith, Beckwith, ohlinger & Froelick, Toledo and Lease & Eastman, Ottawa, for Sugar Co.
    J. T. DeFord, Ottawa, for Agner.
   HUGHES, J.

There was no objection made by the defendant to proceeding with the trial, nor was there any objection made by the defendant when it appeared in court to submit the motion to quash on the ground that the justice of the peace had unlawfully delayed the hearing of the case, and thereby lost jurisdiction. When the defendant, being present in court, made no objection to proceeding with the trial, it laid no foundation for error to the common pleas court. The judgment is therefore affirmed. See, Swan’s Treatise, 26th Edition, page 83.

The bill of exceptions filed by plaintiff can not be used for the purposes of this review on error.

Before Judges Hughes, Justice & Crow.