Case ID: f-appx_688/html/0222-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Prentis L. HERNDON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALUTIIQ EDUCATION AND TRAINING, LLC, Defendant-Appellant, and Janina Zequeira-Perez, Defendant. Ahtna, Inc.; Arctic Slope Regional Corporation; Bristol Bay Native Corporation; Calista Corporation; Chugach Alaska Corporation; Koniag, Inc.; Old Harbor Native Corporation; Sealaska Corporation, Amici Supporting Appellant.
    No. 16-1964
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 27, 2017
    Decided: May 5, 2017
    Ramsay C. McCullough, Kristina H. Va-quera, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Prentis L. Hern-don, Appellee Pro Se. Kevin Mark Cuddy, Sarah Langberg, STOEL RIVES LLP, Anchorage, Alaska, for Amici Supporting Appellant.
    Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alutiiq Education & Training, LLC (“AET”) seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying its motion for summary judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 546-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order AET seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 515-16, 126 S.Ct. 1235, 163 L.Ed.2d 1097 (2006); see also 43 U.S.C. § 1626(g) (2012). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, and deny Herndon’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED