Case ID: sw3d_446/html/0738-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Timothy ASHLOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 100468
    Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Division One
    Filed: October 21, 2014
    Andrew E. Zleit, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Chris Koster, Atty. Gen. Todd T. Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J., Glenn A. Norton, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Timothy Ashlock appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).