Case ID: ad_209/html/0906-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Larchmont Gardens Company, Respondent, v. James Hanson, Appellant.
   Order reversed on the law, ivith ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. There is a plain lack of mutuality, and the contract is, therefore, void. (Levin v. Dietz, 194 N. Y. 376, 378; Schlegel Mfg. Co. v. Cooper’s Glue Factory, 231 id. 459, 462.) Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.