Case ID: ad2d_230/html/0789-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sandra H. Votta, Appellant, v Anthony J. Votta, Respondent.
    [646 NYS2d 619]
   —In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Prudenti, J.), entered December 27, 1994, which, inter alia, equitably distributed the parties’ marital property.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

"Equitable distribution presents matters of fact to be resolved by the trial court, and its distribution of the parties’ marital property should not be disturbed unless it can be shown that the court improvidently exercised its discretion” (see, Oster v Goldberg, 226 AD 2d 515). Here, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in distributing the marital property.

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit.

Miller, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan and Florio, JJ., concur.