Case ID: njl_60/html/0242-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MAHLON SPEICHER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY TELEPHONE COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiff in error, Samuel Kalisch.
    
    For the defendant in error, Depue & Parher.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.

For affirmance—Depue, Gummere, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon. 8.

For reversal—None.