Case ID: pa_578/html/0192-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

850 A.2d 629
    Charles F. McCREESH, Petitioner, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Respondent.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    June 2, 2004.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of June 2004, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issue:

Whether, in light of Lamp v. Heyman, 469 Pa. 465, 366 A.2d 882 (1976) and its progeny, a plaintiff should be permitted to have a writ of summons reissued when that writ was originally filed prior to the running of the statute of limitations but ineffectively served?