Case ID: so2d_661/html/0424-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ronald V. AQUINO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 95-1181.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Oct. 20, 1995.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and M.A Lucas, Assistant Public Defender, Day-tona Beach, for Appellant.
    No Appearance for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, we find on the face of the record that there is a discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written sentence. In the context of the entire plea and sentencing hearing, it appears that the discrepancy is the result of a scrivener’s error. Accordingly, we remand for the trial court to resolve the discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written order. Higginbotham v. State, 659 So.2d 461; Marchand v. State, 546 So.2d 1184 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Wilkins v. State, 543 So.2d 800 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 554 So.2d 1170 (Fla.1989). In all other respects, the convictions and sentences are affirmed.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error.

COBB, SHARP, W. and ANTOON, JJ., concur. 
      
      . Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).