Case ID: so2d_833/html/0942-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph WILLIAMS v. RUBICON, INC. and Len Sanford.
    No. 2002-C-0802.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Dec. 4, 2002.
    Rehearing Denied as Amended Jan. 24, 2003.
    Maria N. Alessandra, Larry E. Dem-mons, New Orleans, Harry A. Johnson, III, Alan J. Robert, Phelps Dunbar, L.L.P., Gonzales, for applicant.
    Robert B. Macmurdo, Victor L. Marcel-lo, Talbot, Carmouche & Marcello, Gonzales, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon defendant’s application, we granted certiorari in this case. Williams v. Rubicon, Inc., 02-0802 (La.6/7/02), 818 So.2d 766. After hearing oral arguments and reviewing the record of the matter, we conclude that the judgment below does not require the exercise of our supervisory authority. Accordingly, we recall our order of June 7, 2002 as improvidently granted, and deny plaintiffs application.

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Rehearing is granted for the sole purpose of clarifying this court’s original decree. The decree of December 4, 2002 in this matter is hereby amended to read as follows:

Upon defendant’s application, we granted certiorari in this case. Williams v. Rubicon, Inc., 02-0802 (La.6/7/02), 818 So.2d 766. After hearing oral arguments and reviewing the record of the matter, we conclude that the judgment below does not require the exercise of our supervisory authority. Accordingly, we recall our order of June 7, 2002 as improvidently granted, and deny defendant’s application.

In all other respects, rehearing is denied.