Case ID: pa_320/html/0259-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rosemiller et al., Appellants, v. Biswanger.
    January 6, 1936:
    Argued December 5, 1935.
    Before Frazer, C. J., Schaffer, Maxey, Drew, Linn and Barnes, JJ.
    
      Harry M. Penneys, with him Otto Kraus, Jr., for appellant.
    
      Harold B. Beitler, for appellee, was not heard.
   Per Curiam,

Upon the trial of this action of trespass to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the minor plaintiff, the jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant. The testimony developed a clear question of fact as to defendant’s negligence which was submitted to the jury in a charge which we find to be free from reversible error. A careful examination of the record discloses no ground for disturbing the verdict.

The judgment and order of the court below, refusing plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, is affirmed.