Case ID: njl_110/html/0016-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ALEXANDER F. SCHAACK ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. J. A. HOLMES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS.
    Argued October 24, 1932
    Decided January 5, 1933.
    Por the respondents, Chandless_, Weller & Selser.
    
    Por the appellants, Machay & Machay.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 226.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.