Case ID: ind-app_36/html/0705-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Robinson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Pere Marquette Railroad Company v. Donnelly. Same v. Swanson. Same v. Leslie. Same v. Bellasty. Same v. Locush. Same v. Baker. Same v. Grund. Same v. Martenson. Same v. Aho. Same v. Wonries. Same v. Phillips.
    [No. 5,257.] [No. 5,258.] [No. 5,259.] [No. 5,260.] [No. 5,261.] [No. 5,262.] [No. 5,263.] [No. 5,264.] [No. 5,265.] [No. 5,266.] [No. 5,267.
    All filed June 30, 1905.
    Rehearings denied November 2, 1905.]
    From Laporte Superior Court; Harry B. Tuthill, Judge.
    Suits against the Pere Marquette Railroad Company. From decrees against defendant it appeals.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    
      M. T. Krueger and James F. Gallaher, for appellant.
    
      C. R. & J. B. Collins, for appellees.
   Robinson, J.

The errors assigned and argued in the briefs of counsel in each of the preceding eleven eases are the same as those in Pere Maquette R. Co. v. Smith (1905), ante, 439, and upon the authority of that case and the case of Pare Marquette R. Co. v. Baertz (1905), ante, 439, the judgment of the trial court in each of said cases is affirmed.