Case ID: sw2d_829/html/0128-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

INTERNATIONAL DUNES COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. M.A. MOTANAUGH, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
    No. 60306.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    May 19, 1992.
    Vincent D. Vogler, S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for defendants-appellants.
    Robert J. Guinness, St. Charles, Edwin Lips, II, St. Louis, William Randolph Weber, St. Charles, for plaintiffs-respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellants claim the trial court erred in granting a summary judgment upon a promissory note. After a review of the whole record, we find that no error of law appears and that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. Respondents’ motion for damages for frivolous appeal denied.

Judgment affirmed.