Case ID: ohio-st-3d_70/html/0469-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Doe, Appellant, v. Doe, Appellee.
    [Cite as Doe v. Doe (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 469.]
    
      (No. 94-963
    Submitted September 14, 1994
    Decided October 5, 1994.)
    
      Katz, Greenberger & Norton, Richard L. Norton and Ellen Essig, for appellant.
    
      Graydon, Head & Ritchey, Michael R. Barrett and Jean M. Geoppinger, for appellee.
   The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Ault v. Jasko (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 114, 637 N.E.2d 870, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for application of Ault.

AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent.