Case ID: f-appx_713/html/0988-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hamilton Nolberto Contreras LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 17-13388 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    (February 21, 2018)
    
      Yvette Rhodes, U.S. Attorney Service— Middle District of Florida, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Hamilton Nolberto Contreras Lopez, Pro Se
    Before WILSON, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Darlene Calzón Barror, appointed counsel for Hamilton Nolberto Contreras Lopez in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Contreras Lopez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.