Case ID: sw2d_910/html/0791-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gene T. PATRICK, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Janice M. PATRICK, Respondent/Appellant.
    No. 66757.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Nov. 21, 1995.
    Gail G. Renshaw, Nicholas J. Riggio, Sr., St. Louis, for appellant.
    Gene T. Patrick, Pacific, Pro Se.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and RHODES, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals from the trial court’s judgment on her motion to modify child support. The court denied her motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence filed after the hearing on the motion to modify. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rule 84.16(b).