Case ID: sw3d_109/html/0207-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rodger J. SANSOUCIE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 81386.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    June 24, 2003.
    S. Kristina Starke, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    John Munson Morris, III, Assistant Attorney General, Patrick T. Morgan, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Rodger Sansoucie, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision and affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).