Case ID: sw3d_485/html/0826-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Gaudencio MEDINA-LAUREANO, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 102914
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    
    Filed: April 12, 2016
    Dora A. Fichter, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Plaintiff/Respondent.
    Amy M. Bartholow, 1000 W. Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, for Defendant/Appellant.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gaudencio Medina-Laureano appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of second-degree assault and sentencing him to a year in prison. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not clearly abuse its broad discretion in excluding certain testimony. State v. Chaney, 967 S.W.2d 47, 55 (Mo.banc 1998). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

i