Case ID: ohio-st_111/html/0827-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

City of Findlay v. Public Utilities Commission.
    
      Public Utilities Commission — Lawfulness or reasonableness of order — Review by Supreme Court — Unified telephone service —Valuation and rates.
    
    (No. 18121
    Decided June 21, 1924.)
    Error to the Public Utilities Commission.
    
      Mr. W. S. Snook, city solicitor, and Mr. A. G. Fuller, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Mr. G. G. \Grabbe, attorney general; Mr. John W. Bricker; Mr. Karl E. Burr and Mr. Charles S. Maltby, for defendant in error.
   It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the order of the said public utilities commission be and the same is hereby, affirmed for the reason upon the consideration of the record the court is of the opinion that the order of the public utilities commission is not unreasonable or unlawful. Hocking Valley Ry. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 92 Ohio St., 362, approved and followed.

Order affirmed.

Robinson, Jones, Matthias and Day, JJ., concur.

Marshall, C. J., and Allen, J., dissent.