Case ID: njl_98/html/0271-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

EMMA M. LEBKUECKER, RESPONDENT, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Submitted July 10, 1022
    Decided October 6, 1922.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion, is reported in 97 N. J. L. 112.
    For the respondent, Gustav Haussling.
    
    For the appellant, Wall, Haight, Carey & Hartpence.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Katzenbaeh in the Supreme Court.

For affirm,anee — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchabd, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalis ch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yan Bus-kirk, JJ. 18.

For reversal — None.