Case ID: ga-app_24/html/0698-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

11015.
    Rhodes v. The State
    Decided January 27, 1920.
    Indictment for robbery; from Fulton superior court—Judge Humphries. October 18, 1919.
    
      Tillou Von Nunes, for plaintiff in error.
    
      John A. Boylcin, solicitor-general, E. A. Stephens, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

There is nothing in either of the four special grounds of the motion for new trial that would require a reversal of the judgment; there is evidence to support the finding of the jury, which has the approval of the trial judge, and, as no error of law appears, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Lulce, J., eonour.