Case ID: nys_105/html/1131-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MICHIGAN BUGGY CO., Respondent, v. CAMDEN WAGON & SLEIGH CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    May 15, 1907.)
    Action by the Michigan Buggy Company against the Camden Wagon & Sleigh Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with costs. Held that, while the evidence specified in the order was competent, the order should be affirmed for .other errors in the reception of evidence.

SPRING and KRUSE, JJ., dissent.