Case ID: ohio-st-3d_66/html/0372-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Application of Grossman.
    [Cite as In re Application of Grossman (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 372.]
    (No. 93-362
    Submitted April 6, 1993
    Decided June 16, 1993.)
    
      
      Michael D. Juhola, for applicant.
    
      Vorys, Safer, Seymour & Pease, Charles A. Schneider and Susan M. Barrett, for the Columbus Bar Association.
   Per Curiam.

We concur in the board’s findings and adopt its recommendation. The applicant has failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he possesses the requisite character, fitness, and moral qualifications for admission to the practice of law. Neal L. Grossman’s application to register as a candidate for admission to the practice of law is denied, and he is permanently prohibited from reapplying to take the Ohio bar examination and from reapplying for admission to the practice of law in Ohio.

Application denied.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.