Case ID: pa-super_208/html/0753-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Commonwealth ex rel. Snook, Appellant, v. Rundle.
    Submitted September 12, 1966.
    
      John Snook, appellant, in propria persona; Ralph B. D’lorio and 7mm S. Nedurian, Assistant District Attorneys, Paul R. Sand, First Assistant District Attorney, and Jacques H. Fox, District Attorney, for appellee.
   Order affirmed.

Hoffman, J., dissents because appellant’s statement, which was elicited without a prior warning of his right to remain silent and which admitted an essential element of the crime charged, was introduced into evidence against him.