Case ID: f-appx_50/html/0011-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Oak-Hee RUESCH, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. William P. DILLON, et al., Defendants, Appellees.
    No. 01-1281.
    United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
    Nov. 7, 2002.
    Oak-Hee Ruesch on brief pro se.
    Before BOUDIN, Chief Judge, SELYA and LIPEZ, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the district court’s dismissal of plaintiffs complaint substantially for the reasons set forth in the court’s memorandum order of November 15, 2000. Plaintiffs later motion for reconsideration and new pleading did not cure the complaint’s defects nor otherwise show cause why the complaint should not be dismissed.

Affirmed.