Case ID: nj-eq_110/html/0035-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Catherine E. Lister, complainant-respondent, v. Nathan Vogel et al., defendants-appellants.
    [Argued May 26th, 1931.
    Decided February 1st, 1932.]
    
      
      Messrs. Cook & Stout and Mr. Merritt Lane, for the appellants.
    
      Messrs. Gerand, Matlack & Lautman, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the conclusions of Vice-Chancellor Berry.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenohabd, Paekee, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.