Case ID: nj-misc_3/html/0118-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cukiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PETER GREINER, PROSECUTOR, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, IN THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
    Argued on brief submitted December 2, 1924
    Decided January 29, 1925.
    Land — Dedication for Park Purposes — Fact of Dedication Disputed — Testimony Ordered to be Taken.
    On application for writ of certiorari.
    
    Before Justices Kalis oh, Black and Campbell.
    .For the application, Bernard W. Vogel and Ephraim Cutter.
    
    For the defendants, J. II. Thayer Martin.
    
   Pee Cukiam.

The affidavits presented on behalf of the prosecutor disclose facts which are disputed by defendants, and which facts involve the determination of the * * * the question whether there was a dedication, as claimed by the prosecutor, for jiark purposes, and an acceptance by the township. Testimony must be taken in regard thereto. The writ is allowed with leave to take depositions.