Case ID: conn-app_1/html/0453-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harold Noyes v. University Realty, Inc., et al.
    (2282)
    Testo, Dupont and Borden, Js.
    Argued February 8
    decision released March 27, 1984
    
      Laurence M. Wood filed a brief for the appellant (defendant Anthony J. Mase).
    
      F. Woodward Lewis, Jr., for the appellee (plaintiff).
   Per Curiam.

The appellant did not appear to argue this appeal on the date the case was assigned for hearing. Subsequently, a motion to reargue was denied by the court because we were not persuaded that the reasons given for the appellant’s absence warranted reargument.

Furthermore, a review of the record and briefs indicates that there was no error.

There is no error.