Case ID: sw3d_111/html/0501-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re the MARRIAGE OF Kaye A. Mullins McKENZIE, Petitioner/Respondent, v. John K. McKENZIE, Respondent/Appellant.
    No. ED 81495.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    June 3, 2003.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 24, 2003.
    Application for Transfer Denied Aug. 26, 2003.
    
      Newton G. Mccoy, Schwartz, Herman & Davidson Law Offices, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Elaine Ann Pudlowski, Vines, Frankel, Rubin, Bond & Dubin Law Offices, Clayton, MO, for Respondent.
    Steven William Neimeyer, Clayton, MO, Guardian Ad Litem.
    Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John K. McKenzie (Husband) appeals from the Judgment and Decree of Dissolution (Decree) entered by the trial court on April 2, 2002, as modified by the First Amended Decree and Judgment of May 30, 2002, dissolving his marriage to Kaye A. Mullins McKenzie (Wife). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have provided the parties with a memorandum for their use only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).