Case ID: sw2d_894/html/0252-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eileen M. DAVIS, Respondent, v. William A. FRISELLA, Appellant.
    No. 64915.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    March 7, 1995.
    Charles P. Todt, Clayton, for appellant.
    Thomas H. Nations, Clayton, for respondent.
    Before GRIMM, C.J., and CARL r! GAERTNER and CRANE, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Frisella appeals from the judgment and decree modifying provisions of a dissolution decree pertaining to child custody and support. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are supported by the evidence, are not against the weight of the evidence and do not erroneously declare or apply the law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).