Case ID: ad2d_8/html/0989-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jack Garliner, Appellant-Respondent, v. Allan Herschell Company, Inc., Respondent-Appellant.
   Judgment reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the plain tiff-appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the evidence presented a question of fact which should have been presented to the jury. All concur. (Cross appeals from a judgment of Monroe Trial Term dismissing plaintiff’s complaint and defendant’s counterclaim after motions by both parties as to the complaint and a motion by plaintiff as to defendant’s counterclaim, in an action for damages 'for an alleged breach of contract.) Present — MeCurn, P. J., Kimball, Williams, Bastow and Goldman, JJ.