Case ID: sw3d_122/html/0623-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CARTER BUILDING, INCORPORATED, Respondent, v. Mark LAMARTINA, Sr., Defendant, and Environmental Sales Company, Appellant.
    No. ED 81968.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Oct. 14, 2003.
    Rehearing Denied Dec. 10, 2003.
    Stephen B. Evans, St. Louis, MO, for appellant and defendant.
    James F. McMullin, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
    Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Environmental Sales Co. et al. (hereinafter, “ESC”) appeals the judgment entered following a jury verdict. ESC claims the trial court erred in excluding evidence of lost profits.

We have reviewed all of the briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. There is no genuine issue of material fact or error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).