Case ID: sw2d_945/html/0039-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Everlee HICKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 70986.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    April 29, 1997.
    Gary E. Brotherton, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Everlee Hicks appeals from the motion court’s judgment dismissing his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. He alleges the motion court erred when it denied the motion because the record clearly shows his counsel was ineffective by failing to request a change of venue before his guilty plea. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). 
      
      . This court remanded the original dismissal for an evidentiary hearing in Hicks v. State, 918 S.W.2d 385 (Mo.App. E.D.1996).