Case ID: sw3d_484/html/0349-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Matthew DE LA HUNT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 102168
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    
    Filed: November 17, 2015
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied - January 4, 2016
    Application for Transfer Denied April 5, 2016
    Elizabeth Unger Carlyle, 6320 Brook-side Plaza, # 516, Kansas City, MO 64113, for Appellant..
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, P;0. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.
    Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

■ Matthew De La Hunt appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We find that- the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of íaw are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential, purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).