Case ID: nj-eq_92/html/0240-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marie Schmidt, respondent, v. Albert A. Raphael, trustee, et al., appellants.
    [Decided October 21st, 1920.]
    On appeal from,,a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in 91 N. J. Eq. 386.
    
    
      Messrs. McDermott & Enright, for the respondent.
    
      Messrs. Dam, Tamblyn & Golyer, for the appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalis ch, Black, Katzenbaci-i, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner—13.

For reversal—None.