Case ID: f-appx_5/html/0330-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Priscilla HINES, Petitioner.
    No. 00-2464.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted March 6, 2001.
    Decided March 19, 2001.
    
      Priscilla Hines, Petitioner pro se.
    Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

Priscilla Hines filed this mandamus petition challenging the district court’s remand of her action alleging error in the amount of her social security retirement checks. Because this petition seeks the identical relief sought in an earlier petition filed by Hines, which was denied by this court, and because Hines presents no reason to question the propriety of that decision, we deny mandamus relief. See In re: Hines, No. 00-1924, 2000 WL 1745206 (4th Cir. Nov. 28, 2000) (unpublished). We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.