Case ID: f3d_209/html/1122-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lucio Flores ORTEGA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ernest C. ROE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 97-17232.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    April 24, 2000
    Before: BEEZER, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

Upon consideration of the opinion of the Supreme Court we vacate our opinion in Ortega v. Roe, 160 F.3d 534 (9th Cir.1998). This case is remanded to the district court for proceedings consistent with the-opinion in Ernest C. Roe, Warden v. Lucio Flores-Ortega, — U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 1029, 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000).

The clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.