Case ID: sw3d_532/html/0705-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jeffrey SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 104597
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: September 12, 2017
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied November 13, 2017
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Sri-kant Chigurupati, 1010 .Market .Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
    ATTORNEYS FOR, RESPONDENT: Joshua D., Hawley, Attorney General, Gregory L. Barnes, Asst. Attorney General, P. O, Box, 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.
    Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Sherri B, Sullivan and Kurt'S. Odenwald, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Smith appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).,