Case ID: nys_147/html/1130-12.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PATTERSON, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    May 15, 1914.)
    Action by Kate Patterson against the City of New York and another.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs, as to the appellant the City of New York. Judgment aud order reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, as to the appellant the Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, upon the ground that, in the absence of evidence by plaintiff that the car could have been stopped after the inotorman had notice of the impending danger, no question of fact was raised which justified the court in submitting the question of said appellant's negligence to the jury. Albrecht v. Rochester, S. & E. R. R. Co., 205 N. Y. 230, 98 N. Y. 332.