Case ID: f-appx_432/html/0256-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gary G. HARRIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. TIETEX INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 10-2319.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 26, 2011.
    Decided: May 31, 2011.
    Gary G. Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Brendan Murphy, Fred W. Suggs, Jr., Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gary G. Harris appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendant on his action brought pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Tietex Int’l, Ltd., No. 7:08-cv-03020-JMC, 2010 WL 4365849 (D.S.C. Oct. 28, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.