Case ID: f2d_38/html/0476-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CURTIS v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. et al.
    No. 4194.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
    Feb. 13, 1930.
    N. J. Curtis, of Ridgwood, N. J., in pro per.
    Geo. G. Tennant, of Jersey City, N. J., for respondent.
    
      Before BUFFINGTON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

It appearing in this matter that a final decree was entered in the ease, we are of opinion, after argument and due consideration had, that the appropriate remedy in such case is an appeal and not a mandamus.

The petition for the latter relief is therefore denied.