Case ID: conn-app_18/html/0801-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William R. Petrillo v. Janice A. Petrillo
    (6542)
    Dupont, C. J., Stoughton and Norcott, Js.
    Argued March 7
    decision released March 15, 1989
    
      Robert S. Kolesnik, with whom, on the brief, was Maureen E. Norris, for the appellant (defendant).
    
      William R. Petrillo, pro se, the appellee (plaintiff).
   Per Curiam.

We have scrutinized the record and briefs submitted with this appeal. After affording the defendant’s claims of error the appropriate scope of review, we find them to be without merit.

There is no error.