Case ID: f-appx_651/html/0188-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alexander Otis MATTHEWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Liam O’GRADY, United States District Court Judge, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 16-6214
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 26, 2016
    Decided: June 1, 2016
    Alexander Otis Matthews, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alexander Otis Matthews appeals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(A)(b) (2012) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) and the court’s orders denying Matthews’ multiple motions to amend. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated- by the district court. Matthews v. O’Grady, Nos. 1:15-cv-01162-LMB-TCB, 1:11-cr-00348-LO-1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 2 & 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument' would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED