Case ID: so2d_212/html/0334-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William R. GALIVAN, Jr., individually, and as father and next friend of Mary Alice Galivan and Veronica Galivan, minors; and Mary Galivan, his wife, Appellants, v. The LOWELL DUNN COMPANY, a Florida corporation; and Mills Engineering Company, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
    No. 68-8.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    July 2, 1968.
    
      Highsmith & Ezzo and James O. Nelson, Miami, for appellants.
    Dixon, Dejarnette, Bradford, Williams, McKay & Kimbrell and Joseph Womack, Blackwell, Walker & Gray and James E. Tribble, Miami, for appellees.
    Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The appellants, plaintiffs in the trial court, seek review of an order of the trial court dismissing their amended complaint with prejudice as to the appellees, The Lowell Dunn Company and Mills Engineering Company, Inc. The action in the trial court sounded in negligence, and the cause still pends against another defendant who was the alleged active tort feasor.

The appellees were charged in the amended complaint with having removed a stop sign at an intersection while doing certain construction work, after which an automobile accident occurred between the appellants and the remaining defendant in the trial court.

We find no error in the dismissal of the appellees, The Lowell Dunn Company and Mills Engineering Company, Inc. See: Rosen v. City of Miami, 141 Fla. 664, 193 So. 749; Raven v. Coates, Fla.App.1961, 125 So.2d 770.

Therefore, the final order here under review be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.