Case ID: f-appx_515/html/0707-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Vernon Alvin LOUISVILLE, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. A.W. GIBBS, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 10-56800.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 16, 2013.
    
    Filed April 22, 2013.
    Vernon Alvin Louisville, Jr., Adelanto, CA, pro se.
    
      Donna Ford, Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office Of The U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney LA, Esquire USLA — Office Of The U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
    Before: CANBY, IKUTA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Federal prisoner Vernon Alvin Louisville, Jr. appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the denial of a section 2241 habeas petition de novo and factual findings for clear error, see Reynolds v. Thomas, 603 F.3d 1144, 1148 (9th Cir.2010), and we affirm.

Louisville contends that he is entitled to credit toward his federal sentence for the time he served in state custody before he was released to federal authorities on September 14, 2007. This argument fails because the time Louisville spent in state custody was already credited toward his state sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b); Allen v. Crabtree, 153 F.3d 1030, 1033 (9th Cir.1998) (noting that section 3585(b) disallows double crediting for time served).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.