Case ID: so2d_765/html/0094-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jack VANDERBERG, Appellant, v. Michael W. MOORE, et al., Appellees.
    No. 1D99-903.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    May 15, 2000.
    Jack Vanderberg, pro se.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

The trial court should not have dismissed appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus without specifying which documents appellant failed to supply in his previous filings under section 57.085(7), Florida Statutes (1997). See Bandy v. Sheffield, 751 So.2d 164 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Gosman v. Moore, 745 So.2d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.