Case ID: so2d_267/html/0661-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lester DILBERTH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 72-428.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 17, 1972.
    Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender (and Bennett H. Brummer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for the crime of robbery. The evidence established that he stabbed his victim and was apprehended a short time later near the scene of the crime. He had blood on his clothes. He was identified by the victim.

On this appeal, it is urged that the evidence of the identity of the defendant as the perpetrator of the crime is insufficient. We have determined that this contention has no merit. See State v. Sebastian, Fla. 1965, 171 So.2d 893.

Affirmed.