Case ID: ad3d_140/html/1192-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jason S. Molinaro, Appellant.
    [33 NYS3d 755]
   — Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), rendered November 18, 2014, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the County Court erred in denying his request, pursuant to 7 NYCRR 1900.4 (c) (1) (iii), for a document specifying the section and subdivision of the Penal Law under which he was convicted. However, the defendant’s sentence and commitment specifies the section and subdivision of the Penal Law under which he was convicted, as required by CPL 380.65, so his sentence and commitment fulfills the requirements of 7 NYCRR 1900.4 (c) (1) (iii) (see People v Jackson, 136 AD3d 1056, 1057 [2016]; People v Lynch, 121 AD3d 717, 718-719 [2014]). There was, therefore, no need to provide the defendant with a separate document of the type described in 7 NYCRR 1900.4 (c) (1) (iii) (see People v Ellis, 123 AD3d 1054 [2014]; People v Nelson, 121 AD3d 719, 720 [2014]; People v Lynch, 121 AD3d at 719).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Cohen and Duffy, JJ., concur.