Case ID: or_131/html/0208-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "RAND, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued October 9;
    affirmed November 26, 1929
    GEORGE P. REIHSEN v. THE BURLINGAME CO.
    (282 Pac. 554)
    For appellant there was a brief over the names of Messrs. Senn & Reckon, Messrs. Beach, Simon & Greene and Mr. W. B. STiively with an oral argument by Mr -. F. S. Senn.
    
    
      ■ For respondent there was a brief over the name of Messrs. Gallagher S Conway with an oral argument by Mr. P. J. Gallagher.
    
   RAND, J.

This is a suit for rescission and a companion case to Sharkey v. The Burlingame Co. this day decided. The two cases were argued together and upon the same testimony. The facts are identical except as to the description of the property sold and the further fact that plaintiff did not solicit others to attend the lecture' courses. The same rules were applicable to both cases and from this it follows that, since the decree in that case was affirmed, this should be and it is so ordered.

Affirmed,

Belt .and Brown, JJ., absent.

Rossman, J., dissenting.