Case ID: f-appx_647/html/0211-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charlotte D. MOUNTCASTLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PREMIER AUTO BROKERS INC., Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 15-2381.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 5, 2016.
    Decided: April 28, 2016.
    Charlotte D. Mountcastle, Appellant Pro Se. David Denman Hopper, Cook, Hey-ward, Lee, Hopper & Feehan, PC, Glen Allen, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charlotte D. Mountcastle appeals the district court’s order dismissing her amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mountcastle v. Premier Auto Brokers Inc., No. 2:15-cv-00170-RBS-RJK (E.D.Va. Oct. 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

. AFFIRMED.