Case ID: ill_256/html/0076-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam :", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The Nonotuck Silk Company, Appellee, vs. The Adams Express Company, Appellant.
    
      Opinion filed October 26, 1912
    
    
      Rehearing denied Dec. J, 1912.
    
    This case is controlled by the decision in Nonotuck Silk Co. v. Adams Express Co. (ante, p. 66.)
    Appeal from the Branch “B” Appellate Court for the Eirst District;—heard in that court on writ of error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John H. Hume, Judge, presiding.
    Charles B. Elder, for appellant.
    Brode B. Davis, for appellee.
   Per Curiam :

This case is identical in its facts and the questions of law involved with the case of Nonotuck Silk Co. v. Adams Express Co. (ante, p. 66,) except that the value of the goods was $490.12, and the decision in that case is conclusive in this.

The judgment of the Appellate Court is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.