Case ID: ny_229/html/0615-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harry Eckler, Appellant, v. Village of Ilion, Respondent.
    ' Appeal —• unanimous affirmance of order of trial court setting aside verdict and granting new trial — Court of Appeals may entertain appeal therefrom.
    
    Under subdivision 2 of section 190 of the Code of Civil Procedure an appeal may be taken, as of right, to the Court of Appeals from an unanimous affirmance by the Appellate Division of an order of the court at a Trial Term setting aside a verdict and granting a new trial upon exception.
    
      Eckler v. Village of Ilion, 183 App. Div. 919, affirmed.
    (Argued October 7, 1920;
    decided October 19, 1920.)
    Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered June 4, 1918, which unanimously affirmed an order of the court at a Trial Term setting aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff and granting a new trial.
    
      W. A. Fullerton and Harold E. Blodgett for appellant.
    
      Arleigh D. Richardson for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

This action was brought to recover damages to personal property caused by the explosion of a hot water boiler installed in the dwelling occupied by plaintiff. He had a verdict which the judge who presided at the trial, on motion of defendant’s counsel, set aside and granted a new trial upon the ground, among others, of exceptions taken on the trial. From this order the plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Division, which unanimously affirmed the same, with costs, upon questions of law only, the facts having been examined and no error found therein.” The plaintiff then appealed to this court, giving the usual stipulation for judgment absolute in case of affirmance.

We have examined the record and briefs of counsel and are satisfied the decision of the Appellate Division is correct and its order, therefore, must be affirmed. We should do this without opinion were it not for the fact that upon the argument a question was raised as to the jurisdiction of this court under section 190 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to hear the appeal, no leave having been given to appeal, and no questions certified.

We hold that this court has jurisdiction to hear the appeal under subdivision 2 of such section. This subdivision provides that an appeal may be taken, as of right, to this court, from an order of the Appellate Division granting a new trial on exceptions, where the appellant stipulates that upon affirmance judgment absolute shall be rendered against him. The Appellate Division affirmed the order of the trial court granting a new trial on questions of law only. This, in effect, was the same as though the Appellate Division itself had, on the exceptions taken at the trial, granted a new trial. (Automatic Sprinkler Company of America v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp., 221 N. Y. 552; Reed v. Belnord Realty Co., 222 N. Y. 693.) The stipulation required by the subdivision having been given, the plaintiff, as of right, could appeal to this court.

The order appealed from, therefore, should be affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against the appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts.

His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, etc.