Case ID: cust-ct_50/html/0440-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Wilson, Judge:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(Reap. Dec. 10482)
    Finwood Industries, Inc. v. United States
    Entry No. 9869, etc.
    (Decided April 8, 1963)
    
      Siegel, Mandell é Davidson for the plaintiff.
    
      John W. Douglas, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
   Wilson, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of the appeals for reappraisemeht enumerated in the schedule attached hereto consists of birch plywood, exported from Finland in the years 1952,1953,1954, 1955, and 1956.

Counsel for the parties have stipulated and agreed that the merchandise and issues involved in the said appeals are the same in all material respects as those in the case of United States v. Plywood & Door Manufacturers Corporation, 46 Cust. Ct. 797, A.R.D. 133, decided on remand in Plywood & Door Manufacturers Corporation v. United States, 48 Cust. Ct. 526, Reap. Dec. 10151, and that the record in that case be incorporated as part of the record herein.

The appeals have been submitted for decision on written stipulation, on the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, as in effect prior to the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the birch plywood involved and that such values are those set forth in column “4” of said schedule, packed, less the prorated amounts of the nondutiable charges set forth directly after the description of the merchandise in each said reappraisement case set forth in said schedule.

Judgment will issue accordingly.