Case ID: a3d_184/html/0542-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN RE: ESTATE OF Michael J. EASTERDAY, Deceased
    Petition of: Matthew M. Easterday
    In re: Estate of Michael J. Easterday, Deceased
    Cross Petition of: Colleen A. Easterday
    No. 736 MAL 2017 No. 740 MAL 2017
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    April 17, 2018
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of April, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue for consideration is as follow:

(1) Did the Superior Court decision deviate from well-established principles of statutory construction when the lower court held that the General Assembly intended to incorporate the thirty-day procedural requirement of Pa.R.C.P. 1920.42(b), with regard to the filing of affidavits of consent in divorce actions, into 20 Pa.C.S. § 6111.2, where the language of section 6111.2 is clear and unambiguous and does not contain such time limitation?

The Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The issue, rephrased for clarity is:

(2) Under an employee benefit plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, after a plan administrator distributes funds to the named beneficiary in accordance with the plan documents, can an estate attempt to recover those funds directly from the beneficiary pursuant to a contractual waiver of those benefits contained in a proper settlement agreement?