Case ID: so2d_624/html/0263-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Heide M. Hess JONES, Petitioner, v. Curtis Lee JONES, Respondent.
    No. 80809.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Sept. 30, 1993.
    Jeffrey L. Dees, Dunn, Abraham, Swain & Dees, Daytona Beach, for petitioner.
    Peter Keating, Daytona Beach, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We review Jones v. Jones, 606 So.2d 748 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), based on conflict of decisions. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We recently resolved the conflict in Mize v. Mize, 621 So.2d 417 (Fla.1993). On the authority of Mize, we quash the decision of the district court of appeal; we remand the case to that court for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Mize.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.