Case ID: so2d_421/html/0824-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      MILLS, Judge. ERVIN, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cecil B. STACEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. AH-263.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Nov. 17, 1982.
    Michael Allen, Public Defender, David J. Busch, Asst. Public Defender, Cecil B. Stacey, pro se, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Carolyn M. Snur-kowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
   MILLS, Judge.

This appeal has been conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

After reviewing the entire record, as well as a pro se brief, we find no error and affirm.

WIGGINTON, J., concurs.

ERVIN, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.

ERVIN, Judge,

concurring and dissenting.

I concur in all aspects of the majority’s opinion except that portion affirming the sentence which enhanced appellant’s ninety-nine year sentence for armed robbery by imposing a three-year mandatory minimum sentence for possession of a firearm during the robbery’s commission. Appellant’s pro se brief clearly alleged that such enhancement was a violation of our rule in Skipper v. State, 400 So.2d 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), rev’d. on other grounds, 420 So.2d 877 (Fla., 1982), as applied to armed robbery, involving as an essential element the use of a firearm. Accordingly, I would affirm the ninety-nine year sentence for the offense of robbery, but would strike the enhanced three-year mandatory minimum sentence.