Case ID: sw2d_870/html/0478-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Patricia FITZGERALD, Appellant. Patricia FITZGERALD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    Nos. 61674, 63808.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Feb. 22, 1994.
    Ellen H. Flottman, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before GRIMM, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Patricia Fitzgerald, appeals the judgment of murder in the first degree and armed criminal action and the denial of her Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm.

An Opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no prec-edential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only. This memorandum sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed according to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).