Case ID: f-appx_69/html/0108-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Melvin Eugene ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dwight CRANFORD; Melissa D. Pelfrey; James G. Harris, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 03-6433.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted April 17, 2003.
    Decided April 24, 2003.
    Melvin Eugene Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM:

Melvin Eugene Robinson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Robinson v. Cranford, No. CA-03-145-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.