Case ID: njl_39/html/0714-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dalrimple, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JAMES G. IVINS v. HENRY R. ACKERSON.
    In error to Supreme Court. For opinion of Supreme Court, see 9 Vroom 220.
   Dalrimple, J.

The opinion of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Chief Justice.

For affirmance—Dalrimple, Dixon, Knapp, Eeed, Woodhull, Clement, Green, Lathrop, Lilly—9.

For reversal—None.