Case ID: ny_178/html/0574-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Solomon Ranger, Suing on his Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Other Bondholders of the Tennessee Central Railroad Company, Appellant, v. Ernst Thalmann et al., Composing the Firm of Ladenburg, Thalmann & Co., Respond
    
      Ranger v. Thalmann, 84 App. Div. 341, affirmed.
    (Argued March 14, 1904;
    decided March 29, 1904.)
    Appeal, by permission, from a judgment entered June 19, 1903, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, which reversed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint. The following is the question certified: “ Does the amended complaint herein state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ?
    
      Thomas D. Adams and Arthur C. Palmer for appellant.
    
      Edwvn C. Iloyt and Henry G. Wiley for respondents.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below, and question certified answered in the negative.

Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Cullen and Werner, JJ.