Case ID: f-appx_139/html/0589-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Vincent JENNELL, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 05-6762.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 14, 2005.
    Decided: July 27, 2005.
    Vincent Jennell, Jr., Appellant pro se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, John Leslie Brown-lee, Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Vincent Jennell, Jr., appeals the district court order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons of the district court. See United States v. Jennell, No. CR-02-32 (W.D.Va. Apr. 19, 2005). We grant the motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED