Case ID: ad3d_142/html/0922-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Freedom R. and Others, Infants. Jamila W., Appellant; Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.
    [37 NYS3d 888]—
   Appeal from order, Family Court, New York County (Clark V. Richardson, J.), entered on or about July 23, 2015, which granted petitioner Administration for Children’s Services’ motion for an order directing that the subject children receive all immunizations necessary to allow them to attend New York State Department of Education schools, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.

Because it is undisputed that the children have already been vaccinated, the appeal is moot. The issues presented by this appeal are not sufficiently substantial or novel to warrant invocation of the exception to the mootness doctrine (see Coleman v Daines, 79 AD3d 554, 558 [1st Dept 2010], affd 19 NY3d 1087 [2012]). Were we to reach the merits of the appeal, we would affirm since the mother failed to submit an affidavit, relying only on an affirmation of counsel without any supporting evidence, and thus failed to demonstrate that her opposition to immunization stems from beliefs that are religious in nature, and are genuinely and sincerely held (see Matter of Isaac J. [Joyce J.], 75 AD3d 506, 507 [2d Dept 2010]; Matter of Nassau County Dept. of Social Servs, v R.B., 23 Misc 3d 270, 274-275 [Fam Ct, Nassau County 2008]).

We have considered the remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.R, Acosta, Saxe, Moskowitz and Gesmer, JJ.