Case ID: f-appx_698/html/0548-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Manuel Antonio ASTETE-DIAZ, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 13-73081
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted September 26, 2017 
    
    OCTOBER 3, 2017
    Manuel Antonio Astete-Diaz, Las Vegas, NV, pro se.
    Edward C. Durant, Oil, Claire Workman, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Qhief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
    Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Manuel Antonio Astete-Diaz, a native and citizen of Chile, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision granting voluntary departure. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Astete-Diaz’s challenges to the BIA’s April 2012 order denying his due process claims regarding a continuance and asylum relief, where this petition for review is not timely as to that order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (“The petition for review must be filed not later than 30 days after the date of the final order of removal.”); Rizo v. Lynch, 810 F.3d 688, 691 (9th Cir. 2016) (a BIA order remanding solely for voluntary departure proceedings is a final order of removal).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.