Case ID: nj_53/html/0070-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DIVISION OF PENSIONS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HARRY W. LINDEMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued December 17, 1968
    Decided December 23, 1968.
    
      Mr. Harold M. Kain argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Sticlcel, Kain & Sticlcel, attorneys).
    
      Mr. William J. Brennan, III, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Herbert in the Chancery Division, 103 N. J. Super. 375.

For affirmance—Justices Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman—6.

For reversal—Hone.