Case ID: ny-2d_58/html/0987-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Suburban Pontiac, Inc., et al., Appellants, v General Motors Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendant.
    Argued February 7, 1983;
    decided March 22, 1983
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Michael J. Ricigliano, John F. Principe and David J. Sutton for appellants.
    
      Guy Miller Struve, Mary Anne Wirth, D. Scott Wise and Peter D. Kolbrener for respondents.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs. The factual determinations of the Appellate Division more nearly conform to the weight of the evidence, and there was no error of law in its declaration that General Motors had validly exercised its right to terminate the dealership agreement or in its decision that the complaint should otherwise be dismissed.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.