Case ID: ohio-law-abs_19/html/0001-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "By HAMILTON, PJ.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE ex BENNETT v INDUST COMM
    Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist, Hamilton Co
    No 4769.
    Decided Jan 7, 1935
    Shook, Davies, Hoover & Beall, Cincinnati, for plaintiff.
    John W. Bricker, Attorney General, Columbus, R. R. Zurmehly, Columbus, and Raymond J. Kunkel, Cincinnati, for defendant.
   OPINION

By HAMILTON, PJ.

The motion to quash the service of summons will be overruled. It is established that an objection to the jurisdiction of the court of the subject matter or a motion to dismiss a suit or proceeding upon ahy other grounds than the court’s jurisdiction over the person, operates as a general entry of appearance. Handy v Insurance Co., 37 Oh St, 366. Smith v Hoover, 39 Oh St, 249, at 257. Elliott v Lawhead, 43 Oh St, 171. Klein v Lust, 110 Oh St, 197.

The Commission, therefore, having by the motion entered its appearance in the case, the motion will be overruled. Judgment accordingly.

ROSS, J, concurs.