Case ID: f-appx_70/html/0725-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Christopher D. WAGSTAFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DURHAM, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 03-1012.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted July 15, 2003.
    Decided Aug. 6, 2003.
    Charles Everett Robinson, Robinson Law Office, Rocky Mount, North Carolina, for Appellant. Joel M. Craig, Kennon, Craver, Belo, Craig & McKee, P.L.L.C., Durham, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, WIDENER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM:

Christopher D. Wagstaff appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this Title VII action alleging race discrimination and retaliation. We have reviewed the materials before us and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wagstaff v. City of Durham, 233 F.Supp.2d 739 (M.D.N.C.2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.