Case ID: nj_55/html/0355-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ELIZABETH VAN SICKELL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. ABE MARGOLIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued February 17, 1970
    Decided March 2, 1970.
    
      Mr. Raymond C. Oonnell argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Gonnell & Andre'Sahes, attorneys).
    
      Mr. Adolph A. Romei argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Romei & Bernstein, attorneys).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion per curiam in the Appellate Division, 109 N. J. Super. 14.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Hane-man — 7.

For reversal — None.