Case ID: nj-eq_114/html/0022-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Seaside Improvement Company et al., complainants, v. City of Atlantic City, defendant.
    [Submitted May term, 1933.
    Decided September 27th, 1933.]
    
      Messrs. Thompson & Hanstein> for the complainants.
    
      Mr. John D. McMullin and Mr. Emerson L. Richards, for the defendant.
   Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, and reported in 110 N. J. Eq. 510, sub nom. Seaside Improvement Co. v. Atlantic City Steel Pier Co.

For affirmance — Tete Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteteld, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.