Case ID: f-appx_552/html/0723-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Christian RODRIGUEZ, individually and a class representatives; Alberto Cazarez, individually and a class representatives, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; Carmen Anthony Trutanich; Charles Beck; Allan Nadir; Angel Gomez, Defendants-Appellants.
    No. 13-55467.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Nov. 4, 2013.
    Filed Jan. 17, 2014.
    Olu K. Orange, Esquire, Orange Law Offices, Los Angeles, CA, Cindy Panuco, Esquire, Anne Richardson, Dan Stormer, Hadsell Stormer Richardson & Renick, LLP, Pasadena, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Cory Michael Brente, Esquire, Gary G. Geuss, Esquire, Rena Shahandeh, Carmen A. Trutanich, Esquire, Timothy T, Coates, Marc J. Poster, Gary David Rowe, Greines Martin Stein & Richland, LLP, Los Ange-les, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: McKEOWN, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

Based on the parties’ submissions and supplemental briefing, we conclude that this appeal is now moot. See, e.g., Univ. of Texas v. Camenisch, 451 U.S. 390, 398, 101 S.Ct. 1830, 68 L.Ed.2d 175 (1981) (holding that “the question whether a preliminary injunction should have been issued ... is moot ... [where] the terms of the injunction ... have been fully and irrevocably carried out.”). The case is remanded to the district court for any further proceedings. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.