Case ID: f_87/html/1004-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HAWLEY, District Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CALIFORNIA REDWOOD CO. v. MAHAN.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    May 3, 1898.)
    No. 404.
    Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.
    Page, McCutchen & Eells, for appellant. Barclay Henley and S. Y. Costello, for appellee.
    Before GILBERT and ROSS, Circuit Judges, and HAWLEY, District Judge.
   HAWLEY, District Judge.

This is a companion case to that of California Redwood Co. v. Litle, ubi supra; but the special point relied upon by appellant in this case is that the cancellation of the entry for fraud was made without notice to the claimant or parties interested. The facts are identical with those presented upon this point in Mortgage Co. v. Hopper, 12 C. C. A. 293,. 64 Fed. 553, 556; and, upon the principles announced in that case and the authorities there cited, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs.