Case ID: sw3d_138/html/0759-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHESTERFIELD FENCE CO., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Nataleen PADFIELD, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. ED 83198.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    July 6, 2004.
    
      John S. Steward, Geoffrey S. Meyer-kord, Meyerkord & Steward, L.L.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Thomas A. Federer, Ian C. Simmons, Federer & Federer, P.C., St. Charles, MO, for respondent.
    Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered after a bench trial in defendant’s favor. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).