Case ID: sw3d_568/html/0558-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lonnie SNELLING, Appellant, v. Willie C. HEMPHILL, Jr., et al., Respondents.
    ED 106817
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    Filed: February 26, 2019
    Lonnie Snelling, Pro Se, 1518 79th Street, St. Louis, MO 63130, for appellant.
    Ellsworth D. Ware III, 4144 Lindell Blvd., Suite 126, St. Louis, MO 63108, for respondent.
    Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Lonnie Snelling appeals the denial of his motion to amend or to enter a nunc pro tunc judgment for an order reviving a judgment. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).