Case ID: sw2d_889/html/0065-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Curtis BOCLAIR, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 65382.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Oct. 25, 1994.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 30, 1994.
    Application to Transfer Denied Jan. 24, 1995.
    David C. Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John R. Watson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., GRIMM, C.J., and CRAHAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Curtis Boelair (“Defendant”) appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the judgment of the motion court is based on findings that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).