Case ID: f-appx_332/html/0011-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael Brunell FLANIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Harley Lappin; Officer Smith; Lieutenant Broe; Bop; Lieutenant Negron; A. Joseph; D. Townes; R.E. Holt; T. Thomas; Vanessa Adams; Karen White; Harrell Watts; Dr. B. Rice, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 09-6536.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 26, 2009.
    Decided: Sept. 2, 2009.
    Michael Brunell Flanigan, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Brunell Flanigan appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Flanigan v. United States, No. 2:08-cv-00446-MSD-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 6, 2009 & entered Mar. 9, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.