Case ID: ohio-st-3d_132/html/0316-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Luri, Appellee and Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Republic Services, Inc. et al., Appellants and Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
    [Cite as Luri v. Republic Servs., Inc., 132 Ohio St.3d 316, 2012-Ohio-2914.]
    (Nos. 2011-1097 and 2011-1120
    Submitted June 19, 2012
    Decided July 3, 2012.)
    Tucker, Ellis & West, L.L.P., Irene C. Keyse-Walker, and Benjamin C. Sassé, for appellee in case No. 2011-1097 and for appellant and cross-appellee in case No. 2011-1120.
   Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} The certified question in case No. 2011-1097 is answered in the negative, and the cross-appellants’ first proposition of law in case No. 2011-1120 is sustained. Appellant’s discretionary appeal in case No. 2011-1120 is moot. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded for application of Havel v. Villa St. Joseph, 131 Ohio St.3d 235, 2012-Ohio-552, 963 N.E.2d 1270.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P., Robin G. Weaver, Stephen P. Anway, and Trevor G. Covey, for appellants in case No. 2011-1097 and for appellees and cross-appellants in case No. 2011-1120.