Case ID: nj_214/html/0499-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

70 A.3d 592
    SAM HARGROVE, ANDRE HALL AND MARCO EUSEBIO, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. SLEEPY’S, LLC, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, v. I STEALTH, LLC, EUSEBIO’S TRUCKING CORP., AND CURVA TRUCKING, LLC, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS.
    July 10, 2013.
   ORDER

The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit having certified to the Supreme Court the following question of law pursuant to Rule 2:12A:

Under New Jersey law, which test should a court apply to determine a plaintiffs employment status for purposes of the New Jersey Wage Payment Law, N.J.S.A. § 34:11-4.1, et seq., and the New Jersey Wage and Hour Law, N.J.S.A. § 34:11-66a, et seg. ?;

And the Court having determined to accept the question as certified.

It is ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall set the matter down for oral argument in due course.