Case ID: njl_105/html/0246-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DANIEL A. PALLADINO, RESPONDENT, v. ANDREA RAIO ET AL., APPELLANTS.
    Argued May 23, 1928
    Decided October 15, 1928.
    For the respondent, Fugene Liotta.
    
    For the appellants, Egidio W. Mascia.
    
   Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Teenchabd, Paekee, Mintubn, Ka-LISCH, KaTZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, YAH BuSKIEK, Mc-Glennon, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.