Case ID: cal-unrep_2/html/0271-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "By the COURT.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SHAEFFER v. MATZEN.
    February 25, 1884.
    3 Pac. 95.
    Ejectment.—The Legal Title Being Opposed Only by a Mere Naked Possession, the holder of such title is entitled to the possession.
    J. H. McKune for appellant; Long, Lott & Belcher for respondent.
   By the COURT.

The defendant Stillinger does not appear to have had any claim to the demanded premises beyond what his naked possession gave him; and at the time of the commencement of this action the plaintiff had the legal title, and was entitled to the possession of said premises. This is sufficiently apparent, although somewhat obscured by the finding of a great number of irrelevant facts.

Judgment affirmed.