Case ID: njl_76/html/0576-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. CHARLES SHARP, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued March 9, 1908
    Decided March 9, 1908.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported' in 46 Vroom 201.
    For the plaintiff in error, J ohn J. Crandall.
    
    For the state, Q. Arthur Bolte.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Eeed in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchare, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 14.

For reversal—None.