Case ID: so3d_220/html/1133-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert N. GRESHAM, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. SC16-359
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    [June 1, 2017]
    Thomas A. Burns of Burns, P.A., Tampa, Florida, for Petitioner
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent
   PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Gresham v. State, 181 So.3d 1207 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

CANADY, J., concurs in result.