Case ID: f-appx_584/html/0153-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kpegnon ASSOUMANOU, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 14-1186.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 28, 2014.
    Decided: Oct. 9, 2014.
    Ronald D. Richey, Law Office of Ronald D. Richey, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, Katharine E. Clark, Senior Litigation Counsel, E. Tayo Otunla, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kpegnon Assoumanou, a native and citizen of Togo, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s decision denying her motion to reopen. We have thoroughly reviewed the motion, including Assouma-nou’s affidavit and the various documentary exhibits and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir.2009); see also 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(3) (2014). We are without jurisdiction to review the Board’s decision not to sua sponte reopen the proceedings. Mosere, 552 F.3d at 400-01. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Assoumanou (B.I.A.Jan.31, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.