Case ID: so3d_60/html/0592-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Alfred TUFF, Appellee.
    No. 3D10-2598.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 18, 2011.
    Conroy, Simberg, Ganon, Krevans, Abel, Lurvey, Morrow, & Schefer and Shannon P. McKenna, Hollywood, for appellant.
    Alvarez, Carbonell, Feltman, Jimenez & Gomez and Jorge L. Carbonell and Paul B. Feltman, for appellee.
    Before RAMIREZ, C.J., and WELLS and CORTINAS, JJ.
   ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Based on Appellee’s proper confession of error and our own independent review of the record, we reverse the trial court’s non-final order compelling appraisal and remand for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether post-loss requirements were sufficiently complied with under the policy. See Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Gutierrez, 59 So.3d 177 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Mango Hill Condo. Ass’n 12, 54 So.3d 578 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Maytin, 51 So.3d 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Galeria Villas Condo. Ass’n, 48 So.3d 188 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Reversed and remanded.