Case ID: nj-eq_81/html/0208-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Louis Giusto, respondent, v. Anna Giusto, appellant.
    [Argued November 22d, 1912.
    Decided March 5th, 1913.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Garrison, whose opinion is reported in SO' N. J. Eq. (10 Buch.) 355.
    
    
      Mr. Amedeus Valente (Mr. Leon Abbett, of counsel), for the respondent.
    
      Mr. John J. Fallon (Mr. Maurice J. Breen with him), for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will'be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Garrison.

For affirmance — The Ci-itef-Justioe, Garrison, Swaxze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, ‘Bogbrt, Vredenburgi-i, .Congdon, Tbeacx — 11.

For reversal — None.