Case ID: ga_95/html/0501-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bush v. The State.
    Simmons, C. J. — Several of the grounds of the motion for a new trial fail to distinctly allege error, and are too vague for consideration; the alleged newly discovered evidence, for aught that appears, was known to at least one of the counsel for the accused before the verdict was rendered; the alleged misconduct of the jury was satisfactorily explained; the evidence fully warranted the verdict for voluntary manslaughter, and on the whole it does not appear that any error authorizing the granting of a new trial was committed.
    February 18, 1895.
    By two Justices.
    Indictment for murder. Before Judge Gamble. Washington superior court. September term, 1894.
    T. W. Hardwick and J. N. Gilmore, for plaintiff in error. J. M. Terrell, attorney-general, B. D. Evans, Jr., solicitor-general, and Harris & Rawlings, contra.
    
   Judgment affirmed.