Case ID: pa_604/html/0685-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

987 A.2d 637
    DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION, Petitioner v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CRAWFORD & COMPANY), Respondent.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Dec. 17, 2009.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of December, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the Supersedeas Fund may deny reimbursement of medical treatment rendered before an insurer requested supersedeas, where the Workers’ Compensation Act only permits reimbursement of amounts paid as a result of a denial of supersedeas?