Case ID: sw3d_471/html/0786-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Duron COCKRELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 102297
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    
    Filed: October 6, 2015
    Andrew Zleit, Public Defenders Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St, Louis, Missouri 63101, for Appellant.
    Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent.
    Before Philip M. Hess, P. J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Duron Cockrell (Movant) appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims trial counsel was ineffective for adducing and failing to object to evidence about Mov-ant’s prior bad acts. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying post-conviction relief. Ah éxtend-ed opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).