Case ID: so2d_407/html/0356-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Clinton B. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 81-2004.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Dec. 16, 1981.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reviewof an order of the Polk County Circuit Court which summarily denied his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

Issues which were or could have been raised on a direct appeal are not cognizable grounds for relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Hargrave v. State, 396 So.2d 1127 (Fla.1981); Owens v. State, 397 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

Although appellant makes a bald assertion of ineffective assistance of counsel, he does not provide this court with the specific facts necessary to support such an assertion as required by Knight v. State, 394 So.2d 997 (Fla.1981).

AFFIRMED.

SCHEB, C. J., and RYDER and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.