Case ID: ad2d_299/html/0237-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Saul Castro et al., Respondents, v Antonio Cepero, Jr., et al., Appellants.
    [749 NYS2d 419]
   Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered May 1, 2002, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly denied since it may be reasonably inferred from the evidence that plaintiff, while bicycling, skidded and fell, by reason of dirt tracked onto the street from defendants’ steeply pitched intersecting dirt driveway (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853; Rose v Da Ecib USA, 259 AD2d 258, 259; Sheppard Intl, v Vogel, 147 AD2d 351, 352). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.