Case ID: or_53/html/0161-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Chief Justice Moore.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued January 7,
    decided February 2, 1909.
    HULBERT v. STATE.
    [99 Pac. 422.]
    From Linn: William Galloway, Judge.
    Writ of review by H. F. Hulbert against the State to review a judgment convicting plaintiff of violating the local option law. Proceedings dismissed, and petitioner appeals.
    Affirmed.
    For appellant there was a brief and an oral argument by Mr. John J. Whitney.
    
    For the State there was a brief over the names of Mr. John H. McNary, District Attorney, and Mr. Gail S. Hill, Deputy District Attorney, with an oral argument by Mr. Hill.
    
   Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moore.

This is a special proceeding, instituted by H. F. Hulbert against the State of Oregon, to review a judgment of the justice’s court of Linn County, whereby he was sentenced to pay a fine and costs for violating the provisions of the local option liquor law. The writ of review having been issued, the return thereto sets forth facts relating to the procedure adopted in the justice’s court, and the transcript on appeal to this court shows the determination arrived at by the circuit court for that county to be almost identically the same as detailed in the case of Curran v. State, 53 Or. 154 (99 Pac. 420).

As the conclusion réached in that case is controlling herein, it follows that the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.