Case ID: sw2d_962/html/0466-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles McBRIDE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 54298.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    March 17, 1998.
    
      Gary E. Brotherton, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Angel Woodruff, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before ELLIS, P.J., and HOWARD and RIEDERER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Charles McBride, filed a Rule 24.035 motion to vacate his plea of guilty to one count of possession of a controlled substance and one count of forgery. He asserted that his plea attorney rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to get complete discovery before advising Appellant to plead guilty. The motion court denied Appellant’s motion, finding that Appellant failed to show that further discovery would have produced information that would induce him to reject the plea agreement.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we conclude the judgment should be affirmed. A published opinion would lack precedential value. A memorandum as to the reasons for our decision has been furnished to the parties. Rule

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).