Case ID: sw2d_839/html/0026-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re the ESTATE OF Carolyn Storz BROWN, Respondent, v. Larry Craig BROWN, Appellant.
    No. 61028.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Aug. 4, 1992.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 29, 1992.
    Joe A. Johnson, Arnold, for appellant.
    Hebert Kasten, St. Louis, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from an order which ratified the filing of a dissolution action by wife’s conservator on behalf of wife. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantia] evidence and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).