Case ID: ohio-st-3d_72/html/0483-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Felman.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Felman (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 483.]
    
      (No. 95-393
    
    Submitted April 4, 1995
    Decided July 12, 1995.)
    
      • Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplin- / ary Counsel, for relator.
    
      Stewart I. Mandrel, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We concur in the board’s findings that respondent violated the cited Disciplinary Rules and with its recommendation. We, therefore, order that respondent be suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.