Case ID: so2d_198/html/0014-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Pablo H. LaSALLE, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 35683.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    April 28, 1967.
    Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Phillip A. Hubbart, Asst. Public Defender, for petitioner.
    Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and James T. Carlisle, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this court so we issued the writ. However, after hearing argument of the parties and upon further consideration of the briefs and record we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. Therefore the writ of certiorari heretofore issued is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.