Case ID: vt_10/html/0321-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Clark v. R. M. Field.
    
      (Practice.)
    
    Motion by A. Aikens, of cqunsel for the complainant, for permission to inspect certain letters, &c., in the possession pf the adverse party, which had been proved, as exhibits.
   Per Curiam.

The motion is denied, on the authority of the case of Davers v. Davers, 2 P. Wms. 410, and S. C. 2 Strange, 764,