Case ID: njl_102/html/0725-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. MORRIS DRUIN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted February 12, 1926
    Decided March 26, 1926.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N. J. Mis. R. 986.
    For the defendant in error, J. Willard De Yoe.
    
    For the plaintiff in error, Wood McKee and Weinberger & Weinberger.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Hetfield, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.