Case ID: ala-app_22/html/0672-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "RICE, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(116 So. 924)
    Bail HALL v. STATE.
    (5 Div. 706.)
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    April 24, 1928.
    J. A. Hines, Judge.
    George C. Douville, of Dadeville, for appellant.
    Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.
   RICE, J.

The court has read the entire evidence in this case, sitting en banc. We do not find anything in it connecting the defendant with the possession of the still which was found, or from which such connection might be legally inferred. Eor the error -in refusing to give at appellant’s request the general affirmative charge in his favor, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.