Case ID: sw2d_911/html/0672-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John BLANKENSHIP, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Charles HUCKSTEP, d/b/a HUCKSTEP OIL COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. 67909.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Dec. 5, 1995.
    Jeffrey P. Hine, Oliver, Oliver & Waltz, P.C., Cape Girardeau, for appellant.
    Walter S. Drusch, Lowes & Druseh, Cape Girardeau, for respondent.
    Before CRANE, C.J., SIMON, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant claiming that a genuine issue as to a material fact existed. We affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).