Case ID: f-appx_474/html/0554-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., a corporation, Defendant-counter-claimant-Appellant, v. Frydoun SHEIKHPOUR, aka Fred Sheikhpour, an individual, Defendant-cross-defendant, and A and S Engineering Services, INC., a California corporation, DBA A & S Engineering, Inc., Plaintiff-cross-defendant, and Habib American Bank, Cross-defendant-Appellee., Los Angeles County Tax Collector; et al., Cross-defendants.
    No. 11-57201.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 26, 2012.
    
    Filed July 5, 2012.
    MacKenzie Bright Hunt, Kurt Osen-baugh, Esquire, Samuel C. Taylor, Alston & Bird LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-counter-claimanh-Appellant.
    David K. Eldan, Senior, A Professional Organization, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-cross-defendant.
    Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Appellant Chevron U.S.A. Inc., a corporation, appeals the district court’s denial of its request for preliminary injunctive relief against appellee Habib American Bank. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. The Lands Council v. McNair, 537 F.3d 981, 986 (9th Cir.2008); see Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 129 S.Ct. 365, 374, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int’l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.