Case ID: nj-eq_65/html/0374-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard Siegman, appellant, v. George H. Day et al., respondents.
    [Filed March 11th, 1903.]
    On appeal from a decree in chancery sustaining a demurrer to a bill of complaint and dismissing the bill. See 18 Dick. Ch. Rep. 422.
    
   Per Curiam.

The facts set out in the bill of complaint in this cause are, in their legal effect, identical with those exhibited in the bill in the ease of Siegman v. Maloney, decided at the present term of this court. For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case, the decree brought up ,by this appeal should be affirmed. '

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Yredenburgi-i, Yoorhees, Yroom — 10.

For reversal — None.