Case ID: fla_83/html/0536-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

E. F. Beall, Plaintiff in Error, v. E. E. Cone, Defendant in Error.
    
    Decision Filed April 19, 1922.
    Petition for Rehearing Denied June 5, 1922.
    A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for DeSoto Coun: ty; George W. Whitehurst, Judge.
    
      W. D. Bell, for Plaintiff in Error.
    
      Leitner & Leitner, for Defendant in Error.
   Per Curiam.

-This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment aforesaid, and' briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment, it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

All concur.