Case ID: md_255/html/0651-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HARTMAN et al. v. CADDINGTON
    [No. 106,
    September Term, 1969.]
    
      Decided November 20, 1969.
    
    The cause was argued before Hammond, C. J., and Barnes, Finan, Singley and Smith, JJ.
    
      Robert E. Bullard for appellants.
    
      Frank W. Wilson for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

The appeal must be dismissed because there was no final judgment below from which an appeal could be taken. After a jury verdict, appellants filed a motion for judgment n.o.v. or in the alternative a new trial and the trial court granted a new trial.

Appeal dismissed with costs.