Case ID: ad3d_68/html/0435-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, v Surujdat Mohabir et al., Respondents, and Progressive Insurance Company et al., Appellants.
    [888 NYS2d 881]
   Supreme Court correctly determined that petitioner presented a prima facie case that additional respondent Singh’s vehicle was involved in the accident, which, in view of Singh’s sworn denial of involvement, raises a genuine triable issue of fact justifying a stay pending a framed-issue hearing to determine whether the offending vehicle was his (see Matter of AIU Ins. Co. v Cabreja, 301 AD2d 448 [2003]; cf. Matter of New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. [Reid], 34 AD3d 333 [2006]). Concur— Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Richter, JJ.