Case ID: so2d_568/html/1346-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David Lee CURRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 90-2392.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Nov. 6, 1990.
    David Davis, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
    Jim Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Cobb v. State, 567 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Huff v. State, 566 So.2d 945 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Fla.R.App.P. 9.315(a). We certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance:

DOES A JEOPARDY VIOLATION RESULT FROM THE IMPOSITION OF A PROBATIONARY SPLIT SENTENCE WHEN THE LEGISLATURE HAS NOT EXPLICITLY AUTHORIZED THAT DISPOSITION IN THE SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES FOR § 921.087, FLA. STAT.?

SHIVERS, C.J., and SMITH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.