Case ID: njl_93/html/0473-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HARRY S. MYERS, APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF ROSELLE ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Argued June 23, 1919
    Decided November 17, 1919.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported iii 92 N. J. L. 292.
    Eor the appellant, Collins & Corbin.
    
    Eor the respondents, Cuy W. Gordon and Abe J. David.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Tim Chancellor,, Chief Justice. Swayke, Trenoiiarb, Kaltsch, Black, White, Heppenhetmer, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 11. -

For reversal — None.