Case ID: ohio-st-3d_72/html/0040-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      \n      Per Curiam.\n     Wright, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cleveland Bar Association v. Podor.
    [Cite as Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Podor (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 40.]
    (No. 94-2648
    Submitted January 24, 1995
    Decided April 19, 1995.)
    
      
      Edward T. Clarke, Warren P. Geiger, Robert H. Gillespy II and Mary Cibella, Bar counsel, for relator.
    
      Synenberg & Associates and Roger M. Synenberg, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is, therefore, suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months, but this sanction is suspended on the condition that respondent complete a two-year monitored probation as set forth by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent.

Wright, J.,

dissenting. Because I would not suspend respondent’s six-month suspension, I respectfully dissent.

Moyer, C.J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.