Case ID: so2d_724/html/0705-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dennis FORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 98-2974
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Jan. 27, 1999.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Ellen Griffin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, and Dennis Ford, Sanderson, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Georgina Jimenez-Orosa and Ettie Feistmann, Assistant Attorneys General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

In this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation. We have considered the issue raised in appellant’s pro se brief/petition for writ of habeas corpus and conclude that there is no basis to find that the trial court erred when it denied appellant’s request for 215 days credit for the time spent in the restitution center. See e.g. Martin v. State, 680 So.2d 454 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED.

DELL, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.