Case ID: tex_90/html/0282-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "GAINES, Chief Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

W. S. Robson et al. v. Pliney Byler et al.
    Decided December 3, 1896.
    Presumptions—Commissioners Court—Roads.
    Refusing a writ of error, on the -ground that a correct result was reached, the-court finds it unnecessary to decide whether the presumptions, which obtain with reference to judgments of courts of general jurisdiction, are to be indulged in favor of orders of Commissioners Courts in road matters.
    Application for writ of error to Court of Civil Appeals for First District, in an appeal from Fayette County.
    The application was by Robson and Sawyers to obtain a writ of error-to revise a decision affirming a judgment of the District Court perpetuating an order enjoining applicants from reopening a highway over plaintiffs’ land, which had been closed for two years under an order of the Commissioners Court; which order plaintiffs claimed discontinued the road, but defendants, the road-overseers, attacked as invalid. The. record and briefs have not reached the Reporter, and a statement of the contents of the application is not necessary to an understanding of théopinion. :
    
      Moore & Duncan, for petitioners.
   GAINES, Chief Justice.

In our view of this case, it is not necessary to decide whether or not the same presumptions should be indulged in favor of’an order of the Commissioners Court in establishing a new road which obtain in reference to the judgments of courts of general jurisdiction. Without passing upon that question, we are of opinion that the correct-result was reached upon appeal and that there is no-error in the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals.

The petition for the writ of error is therefore refused.

Writ of error refused.