Case ID: nys_155/html/1148-10.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WETMORE, Respondent, v. CONGER & PHELPS LUMBER CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    October 20, 1915.)
    Action by Madison H. Wet-more against the Conger & Phelps Lumber Company.
   No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Held: (1) That the evidence sustains the verdict. (2) That the evidence of the usual rate of commission was competent. See Barney v. Fuller, 133 N. Y. 605, 30 N. E. 1007; Rubino v. Scott, 118 N. Y. 662, 22 N. E. 1103; Flagg v. Reilly, 23 App. Div. 57, 48 N. Y. Supp. 544.