Case ID: ad2d_51/html/0744-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Maureen K. (Anonymous), Respondent, v Kingsley P. (Anonymous), Appellant.
   In a paternity proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated February 14, 1972, which adjudged appellant the father of the child. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, and petition dismissed. Paternity was not established by evidence which was clear, convincing or entirely satisfactory. Petitioner admitted that she was uncertain of the identity of the father of the child until after the child was born. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Christ, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.