Case ID: f-appx_695/html/0333-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Emery SOOS, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 15-56663
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted August 9, 2017 
    
    Filed August 16, 2017
    Emery Soos, Sr., Pro Se
    Valerie Larissa Makarewicz, Assistant U.S. Attorney, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Los Angeles, CA, John Schumann, Bridget Maria Rowan, Attorneys, DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee
    Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Emery Soos, Sr., appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

In his opening brief, Soos fails to challenge the district court’s decision dismissing his action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and therefore he has waived such a challenge. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[O]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.”); Greenwood v. FAA, 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (“We will not manufacture arguments for an appellant....”).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.