Case ID: ohio-st-3d_116/html/0301-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Fogle et al., Appellees, v. Village of Bentleyville et al., Appellants.
    [Cite as Fogle v. Bentleyville, 116 Ohio St.3d 301, 2007-Ohio-6454.]
    (No. 2007-1433
    Submitted November 6, 2007
    Decided December 13, 2007.)
    Michael B. Pasternak, for appellees.
    Tomino & Latchney, L.L.C., and Nick C. Tomino, for appellants.
   {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the courts of appeals is reversed on the authority of Hubbell v. Xenia, 115 Ohio St.3d 77, 2007-Ohio-4839, 873 N.E.2d 878, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals with instructions for the court of appeals to conduct a de novo review of the law and facts. If, after that review, only questions of law remain, the court of appeals may resolve the appeal. If genuine issues of material fact remain, the court of appeals may remand the cause to the trial court for further development of the facts necessary to resolve the immunity issue.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Hubbell v. Xenia.

O’Donnell, J., dissents.