Case ID: nh_86/html/0596-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Peaslee, C. J. Woodbury, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hillsborough,
    Jan. 2, 1934.
    Joseph George v. Morse & Malloy Shoe Company.
    
      Thorp & Branch (Mr. Branch orally), for the plaintiff.
    
      Wyman, Starr, Booth & Wadleigh (Mr. Ralph E. Langdell orally), for the defendant.
   Peaslee, C. J.

The case is governed by Thomson v. Company, ante, 436, decided this day.

In so far as the facts differ from those in the earlier case, they are not more favorable to the plaintiff.

Exception overruled.

Branch, J., did not sit: Woodbury, J., concurred in the result: the others concurred.

Woodbury, J.

I concur in the result upon the ground that the injury was foreseen, anticipated and not accidental. In so far as the doctrine upon which this case is disposed of is concerned I dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion in Thomson v. Company.