Case ID: so3d_114/html/0978-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Juan Javier ROMO-JIMENEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 5D09-3270.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    May 18, 2012.
    James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Thomas J. Lukashow, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Juan Javier Romo-Jimenez challenges the denial of his motion to suppress recordings obtained following the approval of a wiretap and the trial court’s sua sponte restriction of the cross-examination of a co-defendant. In addition, Romo-Jimenez raises a Shelton issue. Finding no error, we affirm. See Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). We certify that the same issue reviewed in this case is currently pending before the Florida Supreme Court in State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011). The mandate will be withheld pending final disposition in Adkins.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, COHEN and JACOBUS, JJ., concur. 
      
      . Shelton v. Sec., Dep't of Corr., 802 F.Supp.2d 1289 (M.D.Fla.2011).