Case ID: f-appx_599/html/0389-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Florent BAYALA, Appellant v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Office of the General Counsel, Appellee.
    No. 14-5279.
    United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
    March 9, 2015.
    David Laundon Cleveland, Catholic Charities, Washington, DC, for Appellant.
    Kenneth A. Adebonojo, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
    BEFORE: HENDERSON, SRINIVASAN, and PILLARD, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the response thereto, and the reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be denied. The merits of the parties’ positions are not so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam).

Because the court has determined that summary disposition is not in order, the Clerk is instructed to calendar this case for presentation to a merits panel.