Case ID: ad_258/html/0953-08.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Wynne M. Casteel, Respondent, v. Clarence Hodson & Co., Inc., Appellant.
   —■ Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — O’Malley, Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.; Untermyer and Callahan, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial upon the ground that the holding by the court that as matter of law the plaintiff was entitled to recover commissions on sales made outside the principal territory named in the contract of hiring was improper.