Case ID: sw2d_936/html/0180-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael BRADFORD, Defendant/Appellant. Michael BRADFORD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    Nos. 68554, 70230.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Dec. 10, 1996.
    Kent Denzel, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for Defendant/Appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David G. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for PlaintiffiRespondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of one count of second degree assault, § 565.060, RSMo 1994, and one count of armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1994. The court found defendant to be a persistent and class X offender and sentenced him to concurrent prison terms of 15 years for second degree assault and 15 years for armed criminal action. Defendant also appeals the denial, ■ without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).