Case ID: njl_90/html/0312-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LUIGI CARUSO AND CARMELA CARUSO, APPELLANTS, v. TOWN OF MONTCLAIR, RESPONDENT.
    Submitted July 10, 1916
    Decided March 5, 1917.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court.
    For the appellants, Gaetano Belfatto and Wilbur A. Reisley.
    
    For the respondent, Hartsliorne, Insley & Leake.
    
   Per Curiam.

The same question presented in this ease was involved in Nicola Caruso and Guiseppi Caruso, appellants, v. Town of Montclair, decided at the present term (ante p. 255), and for the reasons given in the opinion filed in that case, the judgment herein will bo affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance—Tile Chancellor, Cihee Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trench ard, Parker, Bergen, MInturn, Kallsch, Black, White, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 13.

For reversal—None.