Case ID: okla_187/html/0468-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

TIDAL PIPE LINE CO. et al. v. DAUGHERTY et al.
    No. 29415.
    May 21, 1940.
    Rehearing Denied June 25, 1940.
    
      103 P. 2d 534.
    
    Pierce & Rucker, of Oklahoma City, and A. M. Covington, of Tulsa, for plaintiffs in error.
    Harper, Williams & Boesche, of Tulsa, McCollum & McCollum, of Pawnee, and Hamilton & Clendinning, of Tulsa, for defendants in error.
   PER CURIAM.

This was a proceeding in garnishment against the Washington National Insurance Company, insurance carrier, and H. C. Daugherty. On the 8th day of May, 1939, the district court of Pawnee county, Okla., entered its order sustaining the motion of the Washington National Insurance Company to discharge said garnishment.

A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the cause was not filed herein within 30 days from the date the order discharging garnishment was entered. The motion must be sustained. This court has many times held that in order to appeal from a motion to discharge the garnishee and the order made thereon discharging the garnishee, said appeal must be taken within 30 days as provided by section 555, O. S. 1931, 12 Okla. St. Ann. § 983. Berry-Beall Dry Goods Co. v. Adams, 87 Okla. 291, 211 P. 79; Phillips v. Button, 126 Okla. 138, 258 P. 879; Security Bldg. & Loan Ass’n of Oklahoma City v. Ward, 174 Okla. 238, 50 P. 2d 651; State ex rel. Commissioners of Land Office v. Elam, 161 Okla. 288, 18 P. 2d 865; Stumpf v. Pederson, 171 Okla. 145, 40 P. 2d 15.

The appeal is dismissed.

RILEY, OSBORN, HURST, DAVISON, and DANNER, JJ., concur.