Case ID: sw2d_897/html/0211-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Philip BUCHANAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Suzanne MITCHELL, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. 66913.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    May 2, 1995.
    W. Bevis Schock, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Charles W. Armbruster, III, Carlson, Wendler & Sanderson, P.C., Edwardsville, IL, for respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from the circuit court’s order apportioning costs in a partition suit. We affirm. The circuit court’s order is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).