Case ID: so2d_458/html/0796-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bernard BALLARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 84-954.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 16, 1984.
    Rehearing Denied Dec. 3, .1984.
    Saul T. Von Zamft and Samuel E. Smith, Coral Gables, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Richard E. Doran, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Mabry v. Johnson, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2543, 81 L.Ed.2d 437 (1984). Cf. State v. Borrego, 445 So.2d 666 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) (in the absence of detrimental reliance on State’s agreement not to prosecute, defendant not entitled to specifically enforce the agreement).