Case ID: sw2d_930/html/0532-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Randall ESROCK, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. C & M BAIL BONDS, INC., and Cody Ice, Defendants/Appellants.
    No. 68766.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Oct. 15, 1996.
    Gregg T. Hyder, Columbia, for defendants/appellants.
    Mark D. Hirsehfeld, Clayton, for plain-tifffrespondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendants appeal the judgment for plaintiff in an action for breach of a criminal bail bond agreement following a bench trial. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).