Case ID: f-appx_350/html/0121-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Enrique BOJORQUEZ-SOTO, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-10473.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 13, 2009 .
    Filed Oct. 27, 2009.
    Francisco Leon, Esquire, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: B. FLETCHER, LEAVY, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Luis Enrique Bojorquez-Soto appeals from the 87-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(ii)(II). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Bojorquez-Soto contends that the district court violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32 by failing to rule on a disputed fact in the presentence report. The record reflects that the district court sufficiently resolved the dispute. See United States v. Karterman, 60 F.3d 576, 583 (9th Cir.1995).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposidon is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.