Case ID: la_119/html/0895-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BREAUX, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(44 South. 705.)
    No. 16,813.
    FITZPATRICK v. LETTEN et al. In re FITZPATRICK.
    (Oct. 8, 1907.)
    Application by John Fitzpatrick for a writ ■of mandamus in an action by said Fitzpatrick against Charles E. Letten and others.
    Petition dismissed, and demand denied.
    Dinkelspiel, Hart & Davey, Edward Right- •or, John Patrick Sullivan, and Arthur Landry, for relator. E. Howard McCaleb and •George W. Flynn, for defendant Yirginia Reed.
   BREAUX, C. J.

Applicant’s petition considered; the order being interlocutory from ■which he asks to appeal. Under established jurisprudence, there is no need of, and no right to, an appeal from the interlocutory order permitting the party to bond, on sufficient bond to amply protect plaintiff.

Applicant’s petition and his demand are dismissed.

NICHOLLS, J., concurs in the decree.