Case ID: f-appx_655/html/0581-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Peter DEACON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PANDORA MEDIA, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 12-17734
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted February 11, 2015 San Francisco, California
    Filed July 21, 2016
    Ari Jonathan Scharg, Attorney, Ryan D. Andrews, Jay Edelson, James Dominick Larry, Edelson P.C., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant
    Michele D. Floyd, Esquire, Attorney, Shcks, Ricketts & Case LLP, San Francisco, CA, Jacob A. Sommer, Attorney, Marc Zwillinger, Attorney, ZwillGen PLLC, Washington, DC,' for Defendant-Appellee
    Before: SCHROEDER, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUCK, District Judge.
    
      
       The Honorable Paul C. Huck, United States District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Southern Florida, sitting by designation.
    
   ORDER

On February 24, 2015, we certified a question to the Michigan Supreme Court, which it modified and answered on July 6, 2016.

In view of the Court’s answer, which dispositively resolves-this case, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.