Case ID: f-appx_668/html/0541-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Don BOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BLUESTEIN, NICHOLS, THOMPSON AND DELGADO, LLC; John S Nichols, (individually); State of South Carolina; J Emory Smith, Jr, (Individually); Katherine Bradacs; Tracie Goodwin; United States of America, The, (United States District Court for the District of South Carolina); United States of America, The, Defendants-Appellees.
    
      No. 16-1626
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: September 13, 2016
    Decided: September 16, 2016
    Don Boyd, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Don Boyd appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss Boyd’s civil complaint against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Boyd v. Blue-stein, Nichols, Thompson & Delgado, LLC, No. 3:15-cv-04791-JFA, 2016 WL 1258326 (D.S.C. Mar. 81, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED