Case ID: nc_105/html/0130-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Clark, J.:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. M. HODGES v. BARBARA HILL et al.
    
      Justice of the Peace — Jurisdiction—Married Woman.
    
    A Justice of the Peace has jurisdiction of an action against a married woman to recover a debt contracted prior to her marriage.
    This was a civil action, begun before a Justice of the Peace, and tried before Graves, J., at February Term, 1890, of Lenoir Superior Court.
    From judgment dismissing the action, plaintiff appealed.
    
      Mr. N. J. Rouse, for the plaintiff.
    
      Messrs. IP. E. Shaw and Clement Manly, for the defendants.
   Clark, J.:

The only question' presented is whether a Justice of the Peace has jurisdiction of an action against a married woman'to recover a debt contracted prior-, to her marriage. This is not an open question. It has -been held that he has. Neville v. Pope, 95 N. C., 346. The Code, §1823, expressly provides that the liability’of & feme sole “shall not be altered or impaired” by her marriage. Dougherty v. Sprinkle, 88 N. C., 300, which holds that a Justice of the Peace has not jurisdiction of an action against a married woman, applies only to liabilities incurred by her while a feme covert, and not even to them in cases where she is a free trader, or the proceeding is to enforce a laborer’s lien. The Code, §§1790, 1828, 1831 and 1832; Smaw v. Cohen, 95 N. C., 85.

Error.