Case ID: sw3d_208/html/0343-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Melissa DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 87524.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Dec. 12, 2006.
    Gwenda R. Robinson (Public Defender), St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Melissa Davis (Davis) appeals the Judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County (Court), the Honorable Larry L. Kendrick presiding. Davis pled guilty to three counts of Forgery, Section 570.090.1. The Court sentenced Davis, as a persistent felony offender under Section 558.016, to three concurrent eight year imprisonment terms. Davis filed a pro se Rule 24.035 motion, which the Court denied without an evidentiary hearing.

On appeal, Davis argues that the Court erred when it denied her Rule 24.035 motion. Davis claims she pled facts, not refuted by the record, which indicate that her plea counsel failed to discuss sentence enhancement and parole ineligibility with her before the guilty plea. We have reviewed the briefs and the Record on Appeal, and find no error of law in this case. Thus, a written opinion would have no precedential value. The Judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).