Case ID: so2d_291/html/0643-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James C. GRIMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 73-1154.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    March 15, 1974.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Kenneth J. Scherer, Asst. Public Defender, and H. Joseph McGuire, Legal Intern, for appellant.
    Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Frank B. Kessler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The complained of portion of the Prosecutor’s closing argument, viewed in light of the whole argument and the Court’s instructions, were not of sufficient harm and moment as to dictate a reversal of the defendant’s judgment of conviction of a crime. James v. State, 263 So.2d 284 (2nd D.C.A.Fla.1972); Wingate v. State, 232 So.2d 44 (3rd D.C.A.Fla.1970); and Johnson v. State, 140 Fla. 443, 191 So. 847 (1939).

Affirmed.

WALDEN, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.