Case ID: pa_587/html/0510-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

901 A.2d 982
    COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Nathan DUNLAP, Petitioner.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    June 27, 2006.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of June 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following questions:

Whether the Superior Court’s decision is inconsistent with this Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Banks, 540 Pa. 458, 658 A.2d 752 (1995)?
Whether this Court’s per curiam decisions reversing orders denying suppression of evidence, have precedential value where this Court has specifically cited Banks as the basis for reversal?