Case ID: nj-eq_92/html/0230-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph D. Bardo, respondent, v. Elizabeth Bardo, appellant.
    [Decided October 21st, 1920.]
    On appeal from a. decree, of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, whose opinion is reported in 92 N. J. Eq. 106.
    
    
      Mr. Elmer W. Demurest, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. Frank G. Turner, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be .affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion, filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis. '.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, .Swayzé, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoi-i, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Ackerson—13.

For reversal—None.