Case ID: ala-app_18/html/0687-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SAMFORD, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(90 South. 926)
    GRAHAM v. STATE.
    (8 Div. 805.)
    (Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    May 10, 1921.)
    Appeal from Circuit Court, Lauderdale County; O. P. Almon, Judge. Roy Graham was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appealed.
    Affirmed.
    This is a companion case to the case of W. B. Smith v. State, 90 South. 45, and the facts are the same in both cases.
    Mitchell & Hughston, of Florence, for appellant.
    Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.
    Harwell G. Davis, A.tty. Gen., for the State.
    Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.
    
      
       Ante, p. 112.
    
   SAMFORD, J.

There is no brief calling the court’s attention to any special ruling of the court upon which error is grounded. In the absence of such brief, we have examined each exception, and are of the opinion that the court did not commit reversible error in any of its rulings. The rulings on the admission of evidence are obviously free from error, and the question of guilt vel non was one of fact for the jury. We find no error in the record, ana the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.