Case ID: so2d_266/html/0212-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      TATE, J. DIXON, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

262 La. 1068
    INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. UTAH-LOUISIANA INVESTMENT CO. et al.
    No. 52822.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 13, 1972.
   In re: International Development, Inc. applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition or mandamus.

Writ refused. The showing made is insufficient to warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.

TATE, J.

I concur in the denial. Louisiana jurisprudence has consistently barred successive injunctive suits by the same party to bar a judicial sale of the same property under the same judgment or order of seizure sale. See McMicken v. Morgan, 9 La.Ann. 208 (1854); Quarles v. Lewis, 226 La. 76, 75 So.2d 14 (1954). See also Slidell Bldg. etc. v. I. D. S. Mtg. Corp., 237 So.2d 923 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1970); Simon v. Broussard, 216 So.2d 668 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1969).

DIXON, Justice.

I concur in the denial. Although there is no bar to successive injunction suits in sales under executory proceedings, the allegations of defects in this proceeding are not sufficient to support injunctive relief.