Case ID: f-appx_4/html/0428-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David A. ELIAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Susan JUST; Karen Scurrh; Aron Franchello; Marc Greenbaum; Anthony Summers; Sherrie Moffet; Lawrence Richman; the State of California, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 96-56855.
    D.C. No. CV-96-00621-AHS.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 12, 2001.
    
    Decided Feb. 21, 2001.
    
      Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      . The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument and denies Elias’ request for oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

David A. Elias appeals pro se a minute order of the district court dismissing his civil rights complaint with leave to amend, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 8. Because this order was neither final nor appealable, we lack jurisdiction and must dismiss the appeal. Indian Oasis-Baboquivari Unified Sch. Dist. v. Kirk, 109 F.3d 634, 636 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc). Dismissal of the State of California due to its immunity under the Eleventh Amendment does not change this result. Id.

Elias’ March 25, 1997 motion for judicial notice and May 1, 1998 “motion to argument record on appeal” are denied as moot.

No further filings shall be accepted on this closed appeal. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

DISMISSED. 
      
      . This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.