Case ID: so2d_545/html/0974-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Coleman ABSHER, Appellant, v. BROWARD MARINE, INC., Appellee.
    No. 88-0782.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    July 12, 1989.
    Richard A. Barnett of Barnett & Hammer, P.A., Hollywood, and James W. Knight, Jr. of James W. Knight, Jr., P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    James E. McDonald, Eileen L. Parsons, and Aimee Gilman of McDermott, Will & Emery, Miami, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final judgment granting appellee’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Considering the evidence most favorably to the appellant, there was sufficient proof to support his interpretation of the contract. We cannot say here, as a matter of law, that the appellant was not entitled under his contract to the payment in question for services rendered.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and STONE, JJ., concur.