Case ID: sw3d_351/html/0249-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marvin J. NORMAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. ED 95883.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Oct. 25, 2011.
    
      Stephen A. Walsh, Law Offices of Stephen A. Walsh, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Katherine J. Hausman, Law Offices of Rouse and Cary, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in an action to recover damages from injuries suffered when he was bitten by his dog while it was being examined by a veterinarian. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).