Case ID: md_236/html/0643-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MORGAN v. DIRECTOR OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION
    [App. No. 59,
    September Term, 1964.]
    
      Decided November 16, 1964.
    
    Before Henderson, C. J., and Hammond, Prescott, HornEy, Sybert and Oppenheimer, JJ.
   Per Curiam.

In this application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency the applicant raises contentions all of which are without merit, and are answered by prior decisions in Eggleston v. State, 209 Md. 504; Gee v. Director, 231 Md. 610; Porter v. Director, 232 Md. 639, and Pierson v. Director, 235 Md. 654. The crimes for which he was sentenced were enough to bring him within the provisions of sub-sections 1 and 5 of section 6(a) of Article 31B, and we think the report of Patuxent supports the finding of defective delinquency.

Application denied.