Case ID: f-appx_690/html/0312-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael HASAN, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-3824
    United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
    Filed May 23, 2017
    Ranya Elzein, Carmen Evette Henderson, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Thomas E. Conway, Law Offices, Cleveland, OH, for Defendant-Appellant
    BEFORE: CLAY, GIBBONS, and STRANCH, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

The issue presented by this case is whether Michael Hasan’s aggravated-robbery conviction pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code § 2911.01(A)(1) qualifies as a violent felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act’s (“ACCA”) use-of-force clause. On April 3, 2017, we definitively answered that question. In United States v. Patterson, 853 F.3d 298 (6th Cir. 2017), a unanimous panel of this court held that a conviction under § 2911.01(A)(1) is categorically a violent felony pursuant to the ACCA’s use-of-force clause because the Ohio statute requires proof of the use, attempted use, or threated use of physical force against another person. That resolves this matter. Accordingly, because his Ohio aggravated-robbery conviction qualifies as an ACCA predicate offense, we affirm the district court’s determination that Hasan is an armed career criminal.