Case ID: f-appx_654/html/0651-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos CARMONA, also known as Kid, Defendant-Appellant
    No. 15-41028
    Summary Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Date Filed: 07/07/2016
    Ernest Gonzalez, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Plano, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Carlos Carmona, Pro Se
    Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Carmona has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S, 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Carmona has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Carmona’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the issue without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Carmona’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Carmo-na’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED as untimely. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.