Case ID: ny-st-rep_16/html/1017-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHARLES H. HALL, Resp’t, v. ANDREW ARMANDO, App’lt.
    Counterclaim—When properly disregarded.
    
      E Mehling, for resp’t; M. Bogersderfer, for app’lt.
   Per Curiam.

The action in the fourth district court being for the claim and delivery of personal property, the counterclaim for work, labor and services was properly disregarded, as another action can be brought for that counterclaim.

We cannot see that any error was committed by the justice, in the trial, and the judgment should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.