Case ID: or-app_228/html/0738-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

On appellant’s petition for reconsideration filed April 15,
    reconsideration allowed; former opinion (227 Or App 9, 204 P3d 852) modified and adhered to as modified May 27, 2009
    STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ANDREW FREDERIC PULCIPHER, Defendant-Appellant.
    
    Washington County Circuit Court
    C020754CR, C020987CR, C013620CR;
    A118944 (Control), A120457, A120070
    209 P3d 380
    Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Rebecca Duncan, Assistant Chief Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, for petition.
    Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Haselton, Judge.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Defendant petitions for reconsideration of our opinion in State v. Pulcipher, 227 Or App 9, 204 P3d 852 (2009), on the basis that we erred in describing his sentence on Count 9 of the indictment as a “consecutive 12-month departure sentence.” Id. at 11. In reviewing the record, we agree with defendant. The sentence imposed on Count 9 of the indictment was a consecutive 12-month sentence, not a “consecutive departure sentence.” Our erroneous description of defendant’s sentence on Count 9 had no effect on our analysis in the remainder of the opinion. Accordingly, we adhere to our opinion as modified to correct the description of defendant’s sentence on Count 9.

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.