Case ID: ny-super-ct_56/html/0610-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James Rogers, Respondent v. James McGay, Impleaded, Appellant.
    Decided April 15, 1889.
    Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff.
    Hastings & Southworth, for appellant. James A. Deering, for respondent.
    Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., Truax and Dugro, JJ.
   This appeal involved only a question of fact. The Court held (Dugro, J., writing, Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Truax, J., concurring) “ that the judgment should be affirmed.”