Case ID: f-appx_329/html/0904-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carol T. MACKEY, Calvin Mackey, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants, v. INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee, Joel A. Freedman, Does 3-10, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 07-14789.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    July 31, 2009.
    Daniel Dwight Bowen, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants.
    Greg M. Taube, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee.
    Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge, and BOWEN, District Judge.
    
      
       Honorable Dudley H. Bowen, Jr., United States District Judge for the Southern District of Georgia, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM:

Carol and Calvin Mackey appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, IndyMac Bank, F.S.B., on their claims seeking rescission under the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1635, as well as the court’s dismissal of their other federal and state law claims.

We review de novo a district court’s grant of summary judgment, applying the same legal standard used by the district court. Johnson v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. Of Ga., 263 F.3d 1234, 1242 (11th Cir.2001).

After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs, and having the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment based on the magistrate judge’s well-reasoned Report and Recommendation filed on August 7, 2007.

AFFIRMED.