Case ID: wash_19/html/0708-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 2870.
    Decided September 17, 1898.]
    M. Gottstein et al., Respondents, v. Katharine Wist, Appellant.
    
    Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. E. D. Benson, Judge.
    Affirmed.
    
      Ballinger, Ronald & Battle, for appellant.
    
      Allen & Allen, for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

It being stipulated by the parties that the question presented in this case is similar to the one decided in Hemrich v. Wist, ante, p. 516 (53 Pac. 710), the judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.