Case ID: ad_178/html/0905-08.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edward J. Ahrens, Respondent, v. Lefstein & Rosenfeld, Defendant, and Morris Lefstein, Appellant.
   Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The facts.as stated in the complaint and as admitted by the demurrer, do not show receipt of the money for the purpose of conversion, or refusal to surrender the same to the plaintiff’s employer, or any demand therefor, and the history of the transaction intermediate the receipt of the money to the application for the warrant is absent. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.