Case ID: a3d_190/html/1130-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Jeffery Charles MAGUIRE, Petitioner
    No. 105 MAL 2018
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    August 7, 2018
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner are:

1. Whether the Superior Court committed an error of law/abuse of discretion in reversing the trial court's suppression of the evidence obtained during the commercial vehicle stop based upon failure to abide by the Tarbert/Blouse guidelines?
2. Whether the Superior Court committed an error of law/abuse of discretion in determining that the Tarbert/Blouse guidelines do not apply to commercial vehicle check-points?
3. Whether the Superior Court committed an error of law/abuse of discretion in failing to affirm the decision of the trial court on alternate grounds?