Case ID: bta_3/html/0459-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Smith:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Appeal of GUARANTY TRUST CO., Executor, Estate of CLAIRE LOUISE BURTON.
    Docket No. 3272.
    Submitted June 29, 1925.
    Decided January 26, 1926.
    Tbe decedent received from tbe administrator of tbe estate of ber deceased husband, wbo died less than five years prior to tbe date of ber own decease, $127,035 in settlement of certain lawsuits. Tbe evidence does not show whether such receipt was a gift, bequest, devise, or inheritance from tbe estate of the deceased husband.
    
      Irving Gordon, Esq., for tbe taxpayer.
    
      J. G. Swayze, Esq., for tbe Commissioner.
    Before Sternhagen, Lansdon, Love, and Smith.
    Tbis is an appeal from tbe determination of a deficiency in estate tax in the amount of $7,630.06. The issue is whether there should be deducted from the gross estate of the decedent, under the provisions of section 403 (a) (2) of the Revenue Act of 1921, $127,035 claimed to have been received from the estate of the decedent’s husband, who died less than five years from the date of the death of the taxpayer decedent.
    FINDINGS OF FACT.
    Frank Vincent Burton, the husband of Claire Louise Burton, died March 11, 1922. His estate paid a Federal estate tax, levied under the provisions of the Revenue Act of 1921, upon the sum of $127,035, which sum was paid to Claire Louise Burton, as hereinafter mentioned. Claire Louise Burton, hereinafter referred to as the decedent, died August 30, 1923. Prior to the date of her death, or on or about May 24, 1923, the decedent received from the administrator of the estate of Frank Vincent Burton, in settlement of certain law suits then pending, the sum of $127,035. This sum was placed to the credit of the decedent on the books of the Guaranty Trust Co. on May 24, 1923. On the day previous the decedent’s balance in the Guaranty Trust Co. was $16,045.77. On June’26, 1923, the decedent purchased 100 shares of Union Pacific Railroad Co. common stock at a cost of $13,420 and 100 shares of American Car & Foundry common stock at a cost of $16,620. On June 29, 1923, she purchased 100 shares of United States Steel Corporation common stock at a cost of $9,315 and 100 shares of American Telephone & Telegraph stock at a cost of $12,115. The total cost of these shares of stock was $51,470. The cost of the purchases was charged against the decedent’s personal account in the Guaranty Trust Co. A transcript of the account of Mrs. Claire Louise Burton in the Guaranty Trust Co. from May 1,1923, is as follows:
    
      
    
    On June 20, 1923, the decedent, Claire Louise Burton, stated to D. B. Crocker, assistant to the trust officer of the Guaranty Trust Co. of New York, that there had recently been received by her a sum in excess of $100,000. On or about June 23, 1923, the decedent requested Crocker to purchase for her the following securities at certain prices:
    One hundred shares American Car & Foundry common.
    One hundred shares American Telephone & Telegraph common.
    One hundred shares Union Pacific Railroad Co. common.
    One hundred shares United States Steel Corporation common.
    The above-named securities were purchased by the Trust Co. and the cost was charged to decedent’s cheeking account in accordance with her instructions. The decedent was ill at the time and it was not until several weeks had elapsed that the question of investing the balance was mentioned. Some time in July, 1923, the decedent told Crocker that she expected to invest the balance of the money which she had received as soon as she felt better.
    DECISION.
    The determination of the Commissioner is approved.
   OPINION.

Smith:

In the estate-tax return filed by the Guaranty Trust Co. of New York for Claire Louise Burton, deceased, there was deducted from the gross estate $121,035, upon the ground that this amount was received by the decedent from the estate of her husband, who died less than five years prior to the date of the death of the decedent. The deduction was disallowed by the Commissioner, apparently upon the ground that the $127,035 could not “ be identified as having been acquired in exchange for property ” received from the estate of the decedent’s husband.

The law applicable to the issue involved is section 403 (a) (2) of the Revenue Act of 1921, which permits the deduction from the gross estate of a decedent, in the determination of the net estate, of “ an amount equal to the value of any property forming a part of the gross estate situated in the United States of any person who died within five years prior to the death of the decedent where such property can be identified as having been received by the decedent from such prior decedent by gift, bequest, devise, or inheritance, or which can be identified as having been acquired in exchange for property so received.”

In the instant appeal the decedent received from the administrator of the estate of Frank Vincent Burton, in settlement of certain pending lav/ suits, the sum of $127,035. The Board is not informed of the character of these law suits, or whether the amount constituted a “ gift, bequest, devise, or inheritance ” received from the estate of her deceased husband.

On reference to the Board, James did not participate.