Case ID: sw3d_513/html/0386-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael J. HAAS, Appellant, v. Thomas W. MCGRATH and Thomas W. McGrath, Trustee, Respondents.
    No. ED 103961
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    FILED: March 14, 2017
    John J. Pawloski, The Law Office of John J. Pawlosk, LLC, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    John Malee, Martin, Malee & Leopold, St. Louis, MO, for Respondents.
    Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Michael J. Haas appeals from the trial court’s Order and Judgment (“Judgment”) granting a motion for directed verdict for Thomas W. McGrath, sued individually and in his capacity as trustee, and entering Judgment in his favor.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The evidence in support of the Judgment was not insufficient. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).