Case ID: f-appx_433/html/0195-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dale E. FINDLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VOLVO POWERTRAIN NORTH AMERICA; Volvo Trucks North America; Volvo Group North America; Mack Trucks, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 10-1782.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 11, 2011.
    Decided: May 31, 2011.
    Steven M. Spiegel, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Suzzanne W. Decker, John M. Gilman, Miles & Stockbridge, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dale E. Findley appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment and awarding costs in favor of his former employer, Mack Trucks. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Findley v. Volvo Powertrain N. Am., No. 1:08-cv03509-JFM, 2010 WL 1418024 (D. Md. Apr. 6, 2010) & (July 1, 2010). We grant Findley’s motion to supplement the record pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 28(j). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.