Case ID: so2d_453/html/0537-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel Ray SULLIVAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 83-1919, 83-1915 to 83-1918.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Aug. 3, 1984.
    Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and Amelia G. Brown, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.
    
      Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Katherine V. Blanco, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the trial court’s revocation of defendant’s probation and in the trial court’s sentencing of defendant on the convictions for which defendant had received probation. This is without prejudice to defendant filing a motion under Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850 on grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. See Williams v. State, 438 So.2d 781, 786 (Fla.1983).

AFFIRMED.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and OTT and LEHAN, JJ., concur.