Case ID: misc2d_143/html/0565-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

224 East 18th Street Associates, Appellant, v Diane Sijacki, Also Known as Diane Smith, Respondent, et al., Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    April 24, 1989
    APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Michael Rikon, P. C. (Michael Rikon and Trudy Karp of counsel), for appellant. Lansner Himmelstein & McConnell (Samuel J. Himmelstein of counsel), for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Final judgment dated December 4, 1987 affirmed, with $25 costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Fuchs, J., at the Civil Court (see also, Matter of Rose Assocs. v State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 121 AD2d 185).

Ostrau, P. J., Parness and Miller, JJ., concur.