Case ID: cal_204/html/0702-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "THE COURT.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[Sac. No. 3995.
    Department One.
    July 11, 1928.]
    LIZZIE H. GLIDE, Appellant, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO (a Municipal Corporation), Respondent.
    Huston, Huston & Huston, for Appellant.
    R. L. Shinn for Respondent.
   THE COURT.

The order granting defendant's motion for a change of venue in this action is affirmed on the authority of Finance & Construction Co. of California v. City of Sacramento, ante, p. 491 [269 Pac. 167]. The only difference in the two cases is that in this case the plaintiff is a private person, while in case No. 3996 the plaintiff is a corporation. This difference is not material to any question involved herein.

Hearing in Bank denied.

All the Justices present concurred.