Case ID: sw3d_14/html/0153-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Willie WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 75739.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Jan. 25, 2000.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 14, 2000.
    Application for Transfer Denied April 25, 2000.
    Daniel L. Mohs, St. Louis, for Appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Kristin M. Frazier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.
    
      Before CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J., and SULLIVAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Willie Williams (“Appellant”) appeals from a judgment denying Appellant’s request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. Appellant claims ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). 
      
      . All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.1999, unless otherwise indicated.