Case ID: so2d_555/html/0945-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Tracy Wayne O’HARA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 89-196.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Jan. 18, 1990.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm in this cause, but certify to the Florida Supreme Court, as a question of great public importance, the same question certified in Blankenship v. State, 545 So.2d 908 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), and State v. Burch, 545 So.2d 279 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989):

IS SECTION 893.13, FLORIDA STATUTES (1987), CONSTITUTIONAL?

DANIEL, C.J., and COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.