Case ID: pa-super_133/html/0180-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cherry v. Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, Appellant.
    November 22, 1938:
    Argued October 25, 1938.
    Before Keller, P. J., Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Parker and Bhodes, JJ.
    
      John J. Penis, with him Ross 3. Penis, of Penis & Penis, for appellant.
    
      John A. Cherry, for appellee.
   Per Curiam,

The six judges who heard the argument in this case being equally divided in opinion, the judgment is affirmed. 
      
       A judgment by an equally divided court is a decision, but not a precedent: Griel’s Est., 171 Pa. 412, 416, 417, 33 A. 375; Com. v. Reid, 265 Pa. 328, 335, 108 A. 829; Etting v. Bank of United States, 11 Wheaton 59, 78.