Case ID: us_333/html/0836-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 286,
    No. 287,
    No. 288,
    No. 289,
    No. 290,
    No. 291,
    No. 292,
    No. 293,
    No. 294,
    No. 295,
    No. 296,
    No. 297,
    No. 298,
    No. 299,
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc.
    Misc,
    Misc.
    Brandt v. United States; Brack v. United States; Brandt v. United States; Gebhardt v. United States; Hoven v. United States; Mrugowsky v. United States; Sievers v. United States; Fischer v. United States; Genzken v. United States; Handloser v. United States; Rose v. United States; Schroeder v. United States; Becker-Freyseng v. United States; and Beigelboeck v. United States.
   Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus and prohibition denied.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Murphy and Mr. Justice Rutledge are of the opinion that the petitions should be set for hearing on the question of the jurisdiction of this Court. Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.