Case ID: f-appx_114/html/0923-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re: Jean Leonard HARRIS, Debtor, Jean Leonard Harris, Appellant, v. Sandra J. Wittman, Trustee, Appellee.
    No. 03-57023.
    D.C. No. CV-03-01554-MLH/AJB.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 6, 2004.
    
    Decided Dec. 10, 2004.
    Jean Leonard Harris, Rancho Santa Fe, CA, pro se.
    Gary B. Rudolph, Esq., Sparber, Ferguson, Ponder and Ryan, San Diego, CA, for Appellee.
    Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jean Leonard Harris appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing as moot Harris’s appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order granting the Trustee’s motion to approve the sale of personal property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158. After de novo review, Ewell v. Diebert (In re Ewell), 958 F.2d 276, 279 (9th Cir.1992), we affirm.

The district court properly concluded that Harris’s appeal was moot because the personal property had already been sold and the bankruptcy court’s conclusion that Jack Swain was a good faith purchaser was not clearly erroneous. See 11 U.S.C. § 363(m); Ewell, 958 F.2d at 279, 281.

Harris’s remaining contentions are without merit.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.