Case ID: f-appx_319/html/0241-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert C. WOODSON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-6121.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 17, 2009.
    Decided: March 24, 2009.
    Robert C. Woodson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon, Edmund P. Power, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert C. Woodson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Woodson, No. 1:96-cr-00370-1 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 5 & entered Jan. 7, 2009); see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir.2009) (“[A] district judge is not authorized to reduce a defendant’s sentence below the amended guideline range.”). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.