Case ID: ohio-st-3d_88/html/0274-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Toledo Bar Association v. Slack.
    [Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Slack (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 274.]
    (No. 99-1895
    Submitted December 15, 1999
    Decided March 22, 2000.)
    
      
      Jonathan B. Cherry and Matthew J. Rohrbacher, for relator.
    
      James D. Caruso, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. However, we do not accept the board’s recommendation of indefinite suspension. Based on the continuing course of misconduct and respondent’s multiple felony convictions, we believe that a harsher sanction is warranted. Therefore, respondent is permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.