Case ID: nj-eq_71/html/0303-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas P. McKenna, respondent, v. Richard F. Corcoran et al., appellants.
    [Argued March 16th, 1906.
    Decided November 19th, 1906.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Garrison, whose opinion is reported in 70 N. J. Eq. QSS7.
    
    
      Mr. Charles J. Roe, for the appellants.
    
      Messrs. Collins & Corbin, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Garrison.

For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredeneurgh, . Vroom, Green, Gray, -Dili—14.

For reversal—None.