Case ID: ala_201/html/0428-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MAYFIELD, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(78 South. 806)
    PEARSON v. HANCOCK & SON.
    (5 Div. 705.)
    (Supreme Court of Alabama.
    April 18, 1918.)
    Appeal and Error <@=»1094(1) — Scope Of Review-Findings of Fact.
    The Supreme Court will not review the Court of Appeals as to findings of facts.
    Certiorari to Court of Appeals.
    Action by Hancock & Son against H. W. Pearson. To review a judgment affirming a judgment for plaintiff (77 South. 934), Pearson petitions for certiorari.
    Writ denied.
    J. W. Strother, of Dadeville, for appellant. George A. Sorrell, of Alexander City, for appellee.
   MAYFIELD, J.

If there be any error in the decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the judgment of the lower court, that error is based on a finding of facts. It has’ been uniformly ruled by this court that we would not review the Court of Appeals as to findings otf facts. If the facts as found by the Court- of Appeals are as stated in the opinion, then the decision is correct!. We find no principle) of law decided erroneously.

It results that the application for certiorari must be denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.