Case ID: sw3d_171/html/0173-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Susan M. SLOCUM, Respondent, v. David W. SLOCUM, Appellant.
    No. ED 85565.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Sept. 13, 2005.
    The Roach Law Firm, Susan K. Roach, Clayton, MO, for appellant.
    Summers, Compton, Wells & Hamburg, Robert F. Summers, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David W. Slocum appeals from the trial court’s judgment and decree of dissolution of marriage dissolving his marriage to Susan M. Slocum and dividing the parties’ marital property. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).