Case ID: f-appx_437/html/0531-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus RODRIGUEZ-MORENO, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 10-50397.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted May 24, 2011.
    
    Filed June 3, 2011.
    David Daniel Leshner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Bruce R. Castetter, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Daniel Casillas, Law Office of Daniel Casillas, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jesus Rodriguez-Moreno appeals from the 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Rodriguez-Moreno contends that the district court procedurally erred by considering his non-scoring prior arrests in formulating the sentence, and failing to adequately address his request for a lower sentence. Though the court mentioned Rodriguez-Moreno’s non-scoring arrests when discussing his history and characteristics under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), Rodriguez-Moreno has not shown that the information formed a basis for the sentence. See United States v. Huckins, 53 F.3d 276, 280 (9th Cir.1995) (“When a sentencing judge considers unreliable information in sentencing, remand is required only if the challenged information is ‘demonstrably made the basis for the sentence.’ ”). Moreover, the district court considered and addressed Rodriguez-Moreno’s arguments for a lower sentence based on his medical condition. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

Rodriguez-Moreno also contends that the district court erred by denying his motion for a downward departure based on physical impairment, pursuant to U.S.S.G § 5H1.4. When an appellant makes such a contention, we will review the ultimate sentence for reasonableness. See United States v. Mohamed, 459 F.3d 979, 986-87 (9th Cir.2006).

Rodriguez-Moreno contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of his deteriorating medical condition. Under the totality of the circumstances and the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), the sentence at the low end of the Guidelines range is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.