Case ID: sw3d_351/html/0273-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael A. NEWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 72986.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Nov. 1, 2011.
    Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
    
      Shaun J. Mackelprang and Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before Division Two: MARK D. PFEIFFER, Presiding Judge, VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Michael Newman appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. Newman claims that the motion court clearly erred because he received ineffective assistance of counsel in that his trial counsel failed to cross examine the victim adequately. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).