Case ID: ohio-st_119/html/0503-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "By the Court.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The Salisbury Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.
    (No. 21194
    Decided November 28, 1928.)
    
      Messrs. Postlewaite & Bricker and Messrs. Brown & Reed, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Messrs. Eerbruck, Shelter, Melchior & Roach, for Stark Electric Railroad Ct>.
    
      Mr. E. G. Turner, attorney general, and Mr. A. M. Calland, for defendant in error.
   By the Court.

This court had the complaint in this case under consideration^in the case of Stark Electric Ry. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 118 Ohio St., 222, 160 N. E., 699, and there held that the complaint stated a case for revocation or modification of the certificate here involved. A hearing before the Public Utilities Commission upon the complaint has since been had, and a finding made against the plaintiff in error upon the evidence. The only question here, therefore, is the weight of the evidence, and upon that subject we find ourselves in accord with the Public Utilities Commission.

Order affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Allen, Kinkade, Robinson and Jones, JJ., concur.