Case ID: f-appx_227/html/0296-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Zara Ellis SADLER, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Barbara Claire TILLEY, Respondent—Appellee.
    No. 07-6075.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 10, 2007.
    Decided: May 14, 2007.
    Zara Ellis Sadler, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Zara Ellis Sadler, who is not incarcerated, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. Section 2254 provides a vehicle for habeas corpus relief for state prisoners “in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State Court” in violation of the Constitution or federal laws or treaties. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). As Sadler’s petition does not arise from a criminal conviction, but rather was filed in connection with Sadler’s employment discrimination action, we conclude the district court properly dismissed the petition without prejudice. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the order of the district court. See Sadler v. Tilley, 2:06-cv-03399-DCN, 2007 WL 36964 (D.S.C. Jan. 4, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.