Case ID: f-appx_126/html/0525-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jorge COMPRES-PAULINO, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 04-1588-CR.
    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    April 26, 2005.
    
      Darrell B. Fields, The Legal Aid Society, Federal Defender Division, Appeals Bureau, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Marc P. Berger, Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (David N. Kelley, United States Attorney; Harry Sandick, Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief), New York, NY, for Appellee.
    Present: FEINBERG, STRAUB, and RAGGI, Circuit Judges.
   SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the case is hereby REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this order.

In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and this Court’s decision in United States v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103 (2d Cir.2005), this case is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings in conformity with Crosby.

The disposition in the opinion previously issued in connection with this appeal is hereby made part of this order and is fully effective, except to the extent that it is inconsistent with the present remand in conformity with Crosby.

Any appeal taken from the District Court following this remand and resentencing, if it occurs, can be initiated only by filing a new notice of appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 3, 4(b).

A party will not waive or forfeit any appropriate argument on remand or on any appeal post-remand by not filing a petition for rehearing of this remand order. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

For the reasons set forth above, the case is hereby REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this order.