Case ID: sw3d_554/html/0556-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Deangelo WILSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 105965
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    FILED: August 14, 2018
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Ellen H. Flottman, Office of the State Public Defender, 1000 West Nifong, Bldg. 7, Ste. 100, Columbia, MO 65203.
    ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
    Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., and Mary K. Hoff, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM

Deangelo Wilson appeals from the "Memorandum Decision and Judgment" denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).