Case ID: f-appx_462/html/0441-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Robert Kim ISTRE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 11-30470
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Feb. 17, 2012.
    Brian Marshall Klebba, Diane Hollens-head Copes, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Stephen Andrew Higginson, U.S. Attorney’s Office, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Deborah Ann Pearce, Law Offices of Deborah Pearce, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Robert Kim Istre has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Istre has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

The record does reveal a clerical error in the judgment. The judgment should be corrected to reflect that Istre pleaded guilty to and was convicted of receipt of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2). See Fed.R.CrimP. 36.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The case is REMANDED for correction of the clerical error pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.