Case ID: so2d_668/html/0234-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Peter MARLOWE, Appellant, v. Thomas J. COVEY, Jr., and Lucille Covey, his wife, Appellees.
    No. 95-1898.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Feb. 7, 1996.
    Rehearing Denied March 6, 1996.
    Morgan & Hendrick, and James T. Hen-drick, Key West; Siegel & Lipman, and Steven M. Goldsmith, Boca Raton, for appellant.
    Browning, Guller and Associates, and Charlene Guller Browning, Key West, for appellees.
    Before LEVY, GERSTEN, and GREEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Haimovitz v. Robb, 130 Fla. 844, 178 So. 827 (1937) (“[H]e is not required under the law to do a vain and useless thing.”).