Case ID: nj-eq_96/html/0384-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frances E. Roberts-Horsfield et al., respondents, v. Cecelia Grace Gedicks, appellant.
    [Filed April 25th, 1924.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery, advised by Vice-Chancellor Baches, whose opinion is reported in 91¡. N. J. Fq. 82.
    
    
      Mr. William New corn, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Joseph T. Hague, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ba<jkes.

For affirmance ■— Ti-ie Chief - Justice, .Teehchard, Parker, Minturh, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzehbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Vah Buskirk, Clark, McGlenhon —13.

For reversal—None.