Case ID: so2d_731/html/0862-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Patricia BIGGER, et al., Appellants, v. MONROE COUNTY, Appellee.
    No. 98-1411.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 19, 1999.
    Angones, Hunter, McClure, Lynch & Williams and Steve Hunter, Miami, for appellants.
    Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke & George and Bruce Johnson and Christine M. Duignan, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and GREEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Even if, as the appellant contends, the supplemental jury instruction on attractive nuisance was error, there was no theory upon which the appellant could prevail given the facts and circumstances of this case. See Gibson v. Avis Rentr-A-Car Sys., Inc., 386 So.2d 520 (Fla.1980); Tampa Elec. Co. v. Jones, 138 Fla. 746, 190 So. 26 (1939).

Affirmed.