Case ID: nys_96/html/1116-15.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CALLAHAN, Respondent, v. SHAW, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    December 29, 1905.)
    Action by William Callahan against Samuel Shaw.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event,, for the error in the exclusion of the evidence on pages 8 and 9 of the stenographer’s minutes, designed to prove that the plaintiff was employed under an agreement for compensation by the other prospective contracting, party.