Case ID: nw2d_360/html/0678-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PARKER, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Minnesota, City of La Crescent, Respondent, v. Bruce Allan STOTESBERY, Appellant.
    No. C9-83-1520.
    Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
    Jan. 22, 1985.
    Hubert H.' Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Linda F. Close, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, William Y. Von Arx, LaCrescent City Atty., Caledonia, for respondent.
    Ross A. Phelps, La Crescent, for appellant.
    Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., PARKER, and FOLEY, JJ., with oral argument waived.
   SUMMARY OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Following a jury trial on August 2, 1983, appellant was convicted of D.W.I. under Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 1(d) (1982). On appeal he claims that the Commissioner of Public Safety failed to promulgate standards for the nurse who drew a blood sample from him. We affirm.

DECISION

Appellant’s contention was specifically addressed in Ouimby v. State, Department of Public Safety, 351 N.W.2d 629, 633 (Minn.1984), where the court held that “the training standards for those authorized to draw blood samples for later analysis for alcohol concentration promulgated by the Commissioner of Public Safety are sufficient to meet the statutory requirement.” His conviction, therefore, is affirmed.

Affirmed.