Case ID: sw2d_861/html/0830-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cecil W. GAVRIL, Claimant/Appellant, v. SUNSET AUTO COMPANY, Employer/Respondent.
    No. 63209.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Oct. 5, 1993.
    Mare S. Wallis, Newman & Bronson, St. Louis, for claimant, appellant.
    Raymond J. Flunker, Jeffrey M. Proske, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, for employer, respondent.
    Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

Claimant appeals from a final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission), modifying the award of an Administrative Law Judge and awarding him $11,778.15. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by substantial and competent evidence and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).