Case ID: sc_279/html/0033-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

21889
    The STATE, Respondent, v. Carolyn P. STEPHENS, Appellant.
    (301 S. E. (2d) 473)
    
      George M. Stuckey, Jr., and Paul M. Fata, of Stuckey Law Firm, Bishopville, for appellant.
    
    
      
      Atty. Gen. T. Travis Medlock, Retired Atty. Gen. Daniel R. McLeod and Asst. Attys. Gen. Harold M. Coombs, Jr., and Martha L. McElveen, Columbia, and Sol. R. Kirk McLeod, Sumter, for respondent.
    
    March 23, 1983.
   Per Curiam:

Appellant appeals from the lower court’s order vacating its earlier order granting appellant a new trial.

The record submitted by appellant does not contain sufficient facts for this Court to consider the propriety of the lower court’s action. Appellant has not met her burden of presenting a record on which the Court can base a decision. State v. Winestock, 271 S. C. 473, 248 S. E. (2d) 307 (1978).

We dismiss appellant’s appeal.