Case ID: f-cas_29/html/0853-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "THE COURT", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Case Wo. 17,478.
    WHANN v. HALL.
    [2 Cranch, C. C. 4.] 
    
    Circuit Court, District of Columbia.
    June Term, 1810.
    Evidence — Subsciubing Witnesses.
    Testimony of the subscribing witness cannot be dispensed with, although he resides in (Massachusetts.
    The plaintiff offered in evidence a receipt, to which there was a subscribing witness.
   THE COURT

refused to receive other evidence of the handwriting, although the plaintiff proved that the subscribing witness resided in Massachusetts, and had not been in the district since the last term.

But THE COURT said they would hear a motion íor a new trial, if the verdict should be against the plaintiff.

Verdict for the plaintiff.