Case ID: f-appx_32/html/0495-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re: Guetatchew FIKROU, Debtor. Guetatchew Fikrou, Appellant, v. First Nationwide Mortgage Corporation; et al., Appellees.
    No. 01-15162, NC-00-1108-RYGR, NC-00-1113-RY GR.
    BAP Nos. NC-00-1108-RyGR NC-00-1113-RyGR.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 8, 2002 .
    Decided April 15, 2002.
    Before BROWNING, KLEINFELD, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, appellant’s request for oral argument is denied.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Guetatchew Fikrou appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s judgment dismissing Fikrou’s adversary action, which challenged defendants’ transfer of property. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We independently review the BAP decision. See United States v. Battley (In re Kimura), 969 F.2d 806, 810 (9th Cir.1992). We review for clear error the bankruptcy court’s findings of fact, and we review de novo its conclusions of law. See id. We affirm for the reasons stated in the BAP’s memorandum disposition filed December 28, 2000.

Fikrou’s remaining contentions are without merit.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.