Case ID: f-appx_587/html/0081-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Miguel Baltazar De Leon VIVAS, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 14-1639.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 2, 2014.
    Decided: Dec. 16, 2014.
    John E. Gallagher, Catonsville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Joyce R. Branda, Acting Assistant Attorney General, John S. Hogan, Senior Litigation Counsel, Samuel P. Go, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Miguel Baltazar De Leon Vivas (“Petitioner”), a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his request for protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Petitioner’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. See Dankam v. Gonzales, 495 F.3d 113, 124 (4th Cir.2007) (setting forth standard of review).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: De Leon Vivas (B.I.A. May 30, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.