Case ID: mo-app_28/html/0551-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Philips, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Humphrey Connelley, Respondent, v. William Leslie et al., Appellants.
    Kansas City Court of Appeals,
    January 9, 1888.
    Practice — Bill of Exceptions — Signing of by Other Than Trial Judge — Case Adjudged. — Where a cause was tried before the then judge of the judicial circuit, who went out of office before the bill of exceptions was signed, and the bill of exceptions was after-wards presented to his successor and signed by him. Held, that such successor had no authority to sign such bill of exceptions, with or without the consent of the parties, and that there is no bill of exceptions in this record, which this court can consider.
    Appeal from Bates Circuit Court, Hon. James B. Gantt, Judge.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    . The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
    Silas W. Dooley, for the appellants.
    Thos. J. Smith, for the respondent.
   Philips, P. J.

-There is no bill of exceptions in this record which this court can consider. It appears from the record that the cause was tried before Hon. James B. Gantt, judge of that circuit, who went out of office before the bill of exceptions was signed. The bill of exceptions was afterwards presented to his successor, Hon. D. A. DeArmond, and signed by him. Judge DeArmond had no authority to sign such bill of exceptions, with or without the consent of the parties. Cranor v. School District, 18 Mo. App. 347. As the matters of error complained of by the appellants are such as could only be brought to our consideration by being preserved in a bill of exceptions, it follows that the judgment of -the circuit court is affirmed.

All concur.