Case ID: ny_217/html/0669-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Application of Anna I. Rich, Respondent, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus against Onondaga Chapter, Daughters of the American Revolution, Appellant.
    
      Matter of Rich v. Onondaga Chapter, D. A. R., 166 App. Div. 963, affirmed.
    (Argued February 21, 1916;
    decided March 7, 1916.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 13, 1915, which affirmed an order made at a Trial Term, after trial of the issues before a jury and a verdict directed in favor of relator, directing that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue commanding the defendant to reinstate the relator in the Onondaga Chapter, Daughters of the American Revolution, and restore her to membership therein.
    
      Oliver D. Burden for appellant.
    
      Stewart F. Hancock for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Seabury and Pound, JJ.