Case ID: so2d_606/html/0368-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael John MANNING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 79603.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Oct. 22, 1992.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Allen J. DeWeese, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Michelle A. Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We review State v. Manning, 595 So.2d 307 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), in which the court certified the same question answered by this Court in Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla.1992). Upon the authority of Scates, we answer the certified question in the affirmative. We quash the decision below and remand with directions to reinstate Manning’s probation.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.