Case ID: mass_432/html/1028-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jeffrey Miller & another
      vs. Darryl Fickett & others.
    
    November 21, 2000.
    
      Negligence, Real estate broker, Duty to warn, Assumption of risk. Child. Dog.
    
    
      William McElligott for the plaintiffs.
    
      Clyde K. Hanyen for Remax New Horizons & another.
    
      
       Dorothy Miller, individually and as mother and next friend of Rachel Miller.
    
    
      
       Kathleen Fickett, Remax New Horizons, Suanne DeFrancesco, and Denise Eason. Summary judgment in favor of Darryl and Kathleen Fickett was affirmed by the Appeals Court in an unpublished memorandum and order entered pursuant to its rule 1:28, Miller v. Fickett, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 1122 (2000), and the plaintiffs’ application for further appellate review was denied, 431 Mass. 1105 (2000).
    
   A judge in the Superior Court entered summary judgment against the plaintiffs and in favor of the defendants Remax New Horizons and Suanne DeFrancesco (defendants). The Appeals Court affirmed the judgment, holding that the defendants did not breach any duty to the plaintiffs. Miller v. Fickett, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 654 (2000). We granted the plaintiffs’ application for further appellate review.

For the reasons stated in the opinion of the Appeals Court, we affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.

So ordered.