Case ID: minn_22/html/0531-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Gileillan, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jacob Altman vs. Peterson Graham.
    April 10, 1876.
    The evidence in this case held sufficient to sustain the finding.
    Appeal by defendant from an order of the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis, refusing a new trial. The action was for services rendered, and the defence, that they were rendered under a contract by which plaintiff agreed to work for defendant during the whole summer, and that plaintiff, without cause, quitted the defendant’s service on June 24.
    
      John W. Arctander, for appellant.
    
      Gove & Hides, for respondent.
   Gileillan, C. J.

. There is evidence in the case from which a jury might find either that there was or was not a contract to work for a specific time, and the finding of the court below on the fact cannot be disturbed.

Order affirmed.