Case ID: ga-app_54/html/0241-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MacIntyre, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

25707.
    Hale v. The State.
    Decided September 17, 1936.
   MacIntyre, J.

The verdict finding the defendant guilty of having, possessing, and controlling intoxicating liquor being authorized by the evidence, the court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial containing the general grounds only.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Guerry, J., concur.

Duke Davis, for plaintiff in error.

L. L. Meadors, solicilor, contra.