Case ID: f-appx_85/html/0616-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert Scott REYNOLDS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Charles A. DANIELS, Warden; John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Respondents—Appellees.
    No. 03-35365.
    D.C. No. CV-03-00329-HJF.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 8, 2004.
    
    Decided Jan. 14, 2004.
    Christine Stebbins Dahl, Esq., FPDORFederal Public Defender’s Office, Portland, OR, for Petitioner-Appellant.
    Britannia I. Hobbs, AUS, USPO-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Portland, OR, for Respondent-Appellee.
    Before GRABER, TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   ORDER

Because the appellant has been entirely released from the custody of the Bureau of Prisons, his habeas petition is moot. Without prejudice to appellant’s ability to file a timely complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the appeal is DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.