Case ID: so2d_867/html/1220-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carl WASILESKI, former attorney for Russell J. Warga, and Russell J. Warga, Appellants, v. Shannon D. WARGA, Appellee.
    No. 1D02-2439.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    March 11, 2004.
    
      Carl Wasileski, Titusville, and Russell K. Ramey, Panama City, for Appellants.
    Samuel T. Adams, Panama City, for Ap-pellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s determination to impose attorney’s fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes. We do, however, find error in the apportionment of fees. Accordingly, we vacate that portion of the order and remand with directions that the order require the “attorney’s fee to be paid to the [former wife] in equal amounts by the [former husband] and the [former husband’s] attorney.” § 57.105(1), Fla. Stat. (1999).

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, KAHN and HAWKES, JJ., concur.