Case ID: sw2d_872/html/0177-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael DAVIS-BEY, Defendant/Appellant. Michael DAVIS-BEY, Petitioner/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    Nos. 61853, 63595.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    March 22, 1994.
    Judith C. LaRose, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., F. Martin Dajani, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before GRIMM, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted defendant of one count of first degree burglary and one count of misdemeanor stealing, in violation of §§ 569.160 and 570.030, RSMo 1986. Defendant raises two points on direct appeal. He also raises two points concerning the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).