Case ID: so2d_323/html/0281-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Annie B. CULBERTH, Appellant, v. Iola KEITH and William Keith, her husband, and any and all persons claiming by or through them, Appellees.
    No. 75-542.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Dec. 12, 1975.
    Ralph L. Flowers, Fort Pierce, for appellant.
    No appearance for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant takes a plenary appeal from a trial court order denying appellant’s motion for a judgment on the pleadings in an action to quiet title. The order appealed is an interlocutory order and the appeal should have been designated an interlocutory appeal as provided by Rule 4.2 F.A.R. (1975). However, we shall treat the appeal as an interlocutory appeal. DeWitt v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company, 268 So.2d 177 (Fla.App.1972).

Upon review of the record on appeal and after consideration of the brief of appellant's counsel, counsel for appellee having failed to file a brief, we determine that the appellee’s answer to appellant’s complaint raises issues of fact to be determined by the trial court upon presentation of evidence by the parties. Therefore, the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for a judgment on the pleadings is affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., and CROSS and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.