Case ID: so2d_498/html/1035-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Arthur O. FRANKLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. BK-300.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Dec. 16, 1986.
    Michael E. Allen, Public Defender and Carl S. McGinnes, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Gregory G. Costas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Notwithstanding this court’s prior remand of this case with instructions to the trial court to resentence the appellant in conformity with the provisions of § 39.-111(6), Fla.Stat. (1983), see, Franklin v. State, 476 So.2d 1346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), we find the case again before us on a record which does not include a written statement of reasons justifying imposition of adult sanctions as is required by § 39.-111(6)(d). Accordingly, we again reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

JOANOS, THOMPSON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.