Case ID: nj-super_317/html/0323-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

722 A.2d 114
    D.O., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. T.B., R.B. AND B.R.B., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
    Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
    Argued December 2, 1998
    Decided December 29, 1998.
    Before Judges KING, WALLACE and NEWMAN.
    
      
      David J. Weaver argued the cause for appellant (Trapasso, Dolan & Hollander, attorneys; John D. Williams, on the brief).
    
      S.M. Chris Franzblau argued the cause for respondents (Franzblau Dratch, attorneys; Mr. Franzblau, on the brief).
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm Judge Conforti’s decision dismissing the complaint for the reasons expressed in his written opinion of November 7, 1997. He soundly exercised his discretion in rejecting plaintiffs claimed right to subject involuntarily his alleged adult offspring to genetic blood testing. See M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 429, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); see also Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110, 124, 109 S.Ct. 2333, 105 L.Ed.2d 91, 106 (1989).