Case ID: f2d_283/html/0695-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SARKES TARZIAN, INC., a Corporation, Appellant, v. AUDIO DEVICES, INC., a Corporation, et al., Appellees.
    No. 16431.
    United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
    Nov. 21, 1960.
    C. B. Dutton, Carl D. Overman, Indianapolis, Ind., Jacob Swartz, Los Ange-les, Cal. (Dutton & Kappes, Indianapolis, Ind., Dryden, Harrington, Horgan & Swartz, Los Angeles, Cal., Mason, Koleh-mainen Rathburn & Wyss, Chicago, 111., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.
    Richards, Watson, Birnbaum & Smith, Clifford A. Hemmerling, Los Angeles, Cal. (Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Barrows & Taylor, Thomas F. Reddy, Jr., Fritz L. Schweitzer, Jr., James G. Foley, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees.
    Before STEPHENS, BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed in the case by the learned District Judge, and reported at D.C., 166 F.Supp. 250.