Case ID: so2d_189/html/0194-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HENDRY, Chief Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. Earl L. STAGER, Respondent.
    No. 66-118.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District
    Aug. 2, 1966.
    Bolles, Goodwin & Ryskamp, Miami, for petitioner.
    Frates, Fay, Floyd & Pearson and Larry Stewart, Miami, for respondent.
    . Before HENDRY, C. J., and CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.
   HENDRY, Chief Judge.

The issues raised by the petition for writ of certiorari were decided in our decision filed on this date, August 2, 1966, Stager v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, Fla.App.1966, 189 So.2d 192.

Certiorari does not lie to review an order if. there is any other adequate remedy. Fort v. Fort, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 69.

Accordingly, petition for writ of certio-rari is denied.