Case ID: f-appx_538/html/0307-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Emmanuel EDOKOBI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE, INC.; Barclays Bank, PLC, Defendants-Appellees, and Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.; Avelo Mortgage, L.L.C.; Deutsche Bank AG; Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC; GS Mortgage Securities Corp.; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; Real Time Resolutions, Inc., Defendants. Emmanuel Edokobi, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.; Avelo Mortgage, L.L.C.; Deutsche Bank AG; Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC; GS Mortgage Securities Corp.; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; Real Time Resolutions, Inc., Defendants-Appel-lees, and Barclays Capital Real Estate, Inc.; Barclays Bank, PLC, Defendants.
    Nos. 13-1289, 13-1432.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 31, 2013.
    Decided: Aug. 26, 2013.
    
      Emmanuel Edokobi, Appellant Pro Se. David Block Bergman, Arnold & Porter, LLP, Washington, DC, Nicholas M. DePal-ma, Venable, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia, Daniel J. Tobin, Ballard Spahr, LLP, Washington, DC, Bizhan Beiramee, McGinnis Wutscher Beiramee, LLP, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Emmanuel Edokobi appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to remand, denying his motion to disqualify, and granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Edokobi v. Barclays Capital Real Estate, Inc.; Edokobi v. Greenpoint Mortg. Funding, Inc., No. 8:13-cv-00288-JFM (D. Md. Feb. 28, Mar. 14 & Mar. 29, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.