Case ID: ny_189/html/0523-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Solomon Plant, Respondent, v. Mary Bahr, Appellant.
    
      Plant v. Bohr, 110 App. Div. 933, affirmed.
    (Submitted June 4, 1907;
    decided October 1, 1907.)
    Appeal from a judgment, of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 16, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover an amount alleged to be due as commission upon an exchange of real estate.
    
      Edward Devine for appellant.
    
      Thomas Ilogan for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of Fisher Co. v. Woods (187 N. Y. 90); no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.