Case ID: so2d_260/html/0235-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Clyde MEACHAM et al., Appellants, v. NOONAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a corporation, and Edward M. Chadbourne, Inc., a corporation, Appellees.
    No. O-488.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    March 23, 1972.
    Rehearing Denied April 25, 1972.
    Wilmer H. Mitchell, of Holsberry, Emmanuel, Sheppard & Mitchell, Pensacola, for appellants.
    Joe J. Harrell, of Harrell, Wiltshire, Bozeman, Clark & Stone, and Robert P. Gaines, of Beggs, Lane, Daniel, Gaines & Davis, Pensacola, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

This appeal challenges the correctness of a final summary judgment rendered in favor of appellees.

A careful examination of the record on appeal conclusively establishes the absence of any genuine triable issue of a material fact with respect to appellees’ liability for the damages suffered by appellants, and that appellees were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed. 23 Fla.Jur. 281, Negligence, § 37; DeLuca v. Manchester Laundry & Dry Cleaning Company (1955) 380 Pa. 484, 112 A.2d 372; Kite v. Jones (1957) 389 Pa. 339, 132 A.2d 683; Cotter v. Bell (1965) 417 Pa. 560, 208 A.2d 216; Tuz v. Burmeister (Fla.App.1971) 254 So.2d 569; General Telephone Company of Florida, Inc. v. Mahr (Fla.App.1963) 153 So.2d 13.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.