Case ID: sw_206/html/0527-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MORROW, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ABOGADO v. STATE.
    (No. 5201.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Nov. 20, 1918.)
    Criminad Daw &wkey;>1099(ll) — Appeal—Statement of Fact — Verification—Certificate.
    A so-called statement of facts, not verified either by agreement of the attorneys or certificate of the trial judge, is wanting in statutory essentials.
    Appeal from District Court, El Paso County; W. D. Howe, Judge.
    Leonardo Abogado was convicted of theft, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    E. B. Hendricks, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   MORROW, J.

Appellant is sentenced to confinement in the penitentiary for a period of 5 years for theft of property over the value of $50.

We find no bill of exceptions bringing to our attention any complaint of the action of the trial court in the conduct of the case. There is filed with the record a paper denominated a “statement of facts.” It is not verified, either by agreement of the attorneys or certificate of the trial judge, and is consequently wanting in statutory essentials. In the absence of a statement -of facts or bills of exception, there is nothing presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.