Case ID: f-appx_26/html/0347-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randolph E. DAWSON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 01-7521.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 31, 2002.
    Decided Feb. 7, 2002.
    
      Randolph E. Dawson, Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MIC}IAEL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Randolph E. Dawson appeals from the district court's order denying his "Motion for Writ of Mandamus." We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Dawson, No. CR-99-88 (E.D.Va. Aug. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.