Case ID: so2d_458/html/0903-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

D’AMICO, CURET & DAMPF, et al. v. Barbara Nations JUMONVILLE, et al.
    No. 84-CC-1777.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Nov. 16, 1984.
   PER CURIAM.

Granted. The court of appeal erred in refusing to consider relator’s application for rehearing. Uniform Rule 2-18.7 applies only when application for supervisory writs either has been denied or has been granted for subsequent disposition after the return date fixed for submission of the case.

In the present ease, the court granted the application as part of a peremptory-reversal. Therefore, Rule 2-18.7 does not apply, and relator is entitled to apply for a rehearing.

Accordingly, the case is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration of relator’s application for rehearing.