Case ID: ga-app_24/html/0267-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Luke, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

10659.
    Norton v. Anderson.
    Decided October 10, 1919.
    Garnishment; from Cobb superior court—Judge Morris. May 10, 1919.
    
      H. B. Moss, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Q. M. Dobbs, Herbert Olay, contra.
   Luke, J.

The only question raised by the exceptions in this ease is whether the evidence authorized the verdict. Upon a careful examination of the evidence we cannot say that the verdict was without evidence to support it. The trial judge having approved the verdict, it was not error to overrule1 the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.