Case ID: f2d_353/html/0739-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Raymond Edward DAVIS, Appellant.
    No. 10226.
    United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
    Argued Dec. 6, 1965.
    Decided Dec. 8, 1965.
    R. R. Ryder, Richmond, Va., for appellant.
    T. P. Baer, Asst. U. S. Atty. (C. V. Spratley, Jr., U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.
    Before SOBELOFF, BOREMAN and J. SPENCER BELL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

This appeal is from the District Court’s denial of a motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. Neither the asserted discrepancy in the testimony nor the allegedly new evidence is of sufficient materiality or weight to warrant our saying that the District Court abused its discretion. We find no error; the appeal is frivolous.

Affirmed.