Case ID: f-appx_694/html/0174-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard Howard BEALL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Governor Lawrence HOGAN; 2 East Staff; Paul Vince; Tom Lewis; Director Robinson; Adam Hockner, Witness Defendant; Jenavive; Peter Ike; Peter, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 17-6626
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 27, 2017
    Decided: August 1, 2017
    Richard Howard Beall, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
    Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Howard Beall, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with the court’s prior order directing him to file an amended complaint particularizing his claims. See Fed. R. Civ, P. 41(b), We have reviewed the record and find no reversible eiTor. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Beall v. Hogan, No. 8:17-cv-00340-GJH (D. Md. filed May 2, 2017 & entered May 3, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED