Case ID: ad_278/html/0631-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kenneth Bellinger, Respondent, v. Town of Salisbury, Appellant.
   Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: Defendant was entitled to inquire of plaintiff Bellinger on cross-examination whether he had received any moneys from Yurkewicz or any of his representatives or attorneys.” It was material on the question of damages. (Knapp v. Boche, 94 N. Y. 329; An ¿merman V. Utilities Oil Gorp., 222 App. Div. 481.) Exclusion of the evidence under the circumstances presents reversible error. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in a negligence action. The order denied a motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.