Case ID: sw3d_509/html/0130-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Trevor TYSINGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 103489
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    Filed: April 26, 2016
    Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Trevor Tysinger appeals from the motion court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Mov-ant’s motion without an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015). 
      
      . All rule references are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2015) unless otherwise indicated.