Case ID: ga_230/html/0607-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Jordan, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

27867.
    WILLADSEN v. WILLADSEN.
    Submitted April 9, 1973
    Decided May 10, 1973.
    
      John N. Crudup, for appellant.
    
      Whelchel, Dunlap & Gignilliat, Weyman H. Forrester, for appellee.
   Jordan, Justice.

This appeal from the grant of a divorce is without merit.

The trial judge heard the case without a jury. His judgment does not disclose any details of the evidence adduced or what rulings were made in respect thereto. The appeal is unaccompanied by a transcript of the proceedings or an acceptable substitute and none appears to be available. The only errors argued and insisted upon, a ruling on the admissibility of testimony and the refusal to grant a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, necessarily require a consideration of what transpired at the trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.