Case ID: mont_16/html/0581-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE, Respondent, v. WHALEY, Appellant.
    [Submitted September 17, 1895.
    Decided September 30, 1895.]
    See syllabus and op nion in State v. Whaley, ante, page 574.
    
      Appeal from, 1 ourth Judicial District, Ha/oalli County.
    
    Conviction for grand larceny. The defendant Matthew L. Whaley was tried before Woody, J.
    Affirmed.
    
      Marshall c& Corbett, Webster <& Wood and Toole <& Wallace, for Appellant.
    
      Henri J. HasTcell, Attorney General, for the State, Respondent.
   Per Curiam.

This is sCn appeal by the defendant from a' judgment convicting him of the crime of grand larceny.

As stated by appellant’s counsel, precisely the same questions of procedure are involved in this case as in the case of State v. Daniel J. Whaley, ante, page 574. Therefore, on the authority of the last-mentioned case, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Affirmed.