Case ID: f-appx_596/html/0251-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Starsha SEWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STRAYER UNIVERSITY, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 14-2123.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 24, 2015.
    Decided: March 11, 2015.
    Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Denise E. Giraudo, Joleen Okun, Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
    Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s order denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion and her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Strayer Univ., No. 8:12-cv-02927-DKC, 2014 WL 1573638 (D.Md. Apr. 18, Sept. 18, Sept. 26, Oct. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.