Case ID: sw3d_539/html/0931-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kurt D. USRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 105592
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: February 13, 2018
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
    ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Mary H. Moore, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.
    Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Sherri B. Sullivan and Kurt S. Odenwald, JJ.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Kurt Usry appeals from the judgment entered on his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).