Case ID: mo_76/html/0055-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Hough, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State, Appellant, v. Sebecca.
    Practice, Criminal. Under the act of 1877 in relation to misdemeanors, (Sess. Acts, p. 855, § 6,) no prosecution founded upon an affidavit alone could be sustained. It was necessary that there should be an information by the prosecuting attorney based upon the affidavit.
    
      Appeal from, Oregon Circuit Court.—Hon. J. R. Woodsidb, Judge.
    Aeeirmed.
    
      D. H. McIntyre, Attorney General, for the State.
    
      Woodside & Seay for respondent.
   Hough, J.

The defendant was proqpded against by affidavit charging him with practicing medicine without having filed, his diploma or registered his name in the county clerk’s office as provided'by statute. No information based upon said affidavit was filed by the prosecuting attorney as required by law, (Acts 1877, p. 355, § 6,) and the proceeding was properly dismissed by the circuit court. The judgment will be affirmed.

The other judges concur.