Case ID: ohio-st_165/html/0341-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State, ex rel. Dawson, v. Roberts, Clerk of Courts.
    (No. 34751
    Decided June 6, 1956.)
    
      
      Messrs. Herbert, Tuttle, Applegate é Britt, Mr. Joseph S. Deutsehle, Jr., and Mr. W. T. Reed, for relator.
    
      Mr. Wray Bevens, prosecuting attorney, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

There is a duty enjoined by law upon respondent, a ministerial officer of the court, to accept and file the petition tendered by relator.

A writ of mandamus is allowed on authority of State, ex rel. Wanamaker, Judge, v. Miller, Clerk, 164 Ohio St., 176, 128 N. E. (2d), 110.

Writ allowed.

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Bell and Taet, JJ., concur.