Case ID: nj-super_96/html/0066-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DANIEL B. ROSETTY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON, IN THE COUNTY OF MERCER, A BODY POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, CROSS-APPELLANT.
    Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division.
    Argued January 16, 1967
    Decided July 12, 1967.
    Before Judges Conford, Foley and Leonard.
    
      Mr. George L. Pellettieri argued the cause for appellant, cross-respondent (Messrs. Pellettieri and Rabstein, attorneys; Miss Ruth Rabstein, on the brief).
    
      Mr. William A. Dietrich argued the cause for respondent, cross-appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Barlow, reported at 82 N. J. Super. 340 (Law Div. 1964).