Case ID: us_506/html/0810-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 91-8579.
    No. 91-8581.
    No. 91-8773.
    Medina v. Kansas. McDonald v. Yellow Cab Metro, Inc. Quinn v. Feltham et al. Oyegbola v. United States. Schultz et ux. v. Parr Elevator, Inc. Carver v. Carver et al.
   Ct. App. Kan.;

Sup. Ct. Tenn.;

C. A. 2d Cir.;

No. 92-5047.

No. 92-5205.

No. 92-5384.

C. A. 1st Cir.;

C. A. 7th Cir.; and

C. A. 11th Cir. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until October 26, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens,

dissenting.

For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), we would deny the petitions for writs of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motions to proceed in forma pauperis.