Case ID: misc2d_47/html/0715-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sulil Realty Corp., Appellant, v. Rye Motors, Inc., Defendant. State National Bank of Connecticut, Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    July 1, 1965.
    
      David C. Gilberg for appellant. Philip F. Schneider for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The order should be affirmed, without costs on the sole ground that title to the property in question was in the respondent, and not in the defendant, at the time the restraining notice was served.

Concur — Martuscbllo, Hogan and Ritchie, JJ.

Order affirmed, etc.