Case ID: so2d_206/html/0210-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Arthur Franklin GRIFFIN, Petitioner, v. M R & R TRUCKING COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Respondent.
    No. 36579.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Jan. 24, 1968.
    Logue, Bennett & Williams, Panama City, and William J. Rish, Port St. Joe, for petitioner.
    Benjamin W. Redding, of Barron & Hilton, Panama City, and Wilfred C. Varn, of Ervin, Pennington, Varn & Jacobs, Tallahassee, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL and ADAMS, JJ., concur.