Case ID: so2d_634/html/0326-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. ZEHMER, Chief Judge", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frederick P. SHOLTZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-1679.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    April 12, 1994.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, J. Yvette Pressley and Carol Ann Turner, Asst. Public Defenders, Tallahassee, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Carolyn J. Mosley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept, of Legal Affairs, Tallahassee, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

KAHN and BENTON, JJ., concur.

ZEHMER, C.J., concurs with written opinion.

ZEHMER, Chief Judge

(concurring).

I concur in the affirmance of this appeal. Lest the prosecution come to the wrong conclusion by reason of this summary affir-mance, however, I write only to point out that the portions of the prosecuting attorney’s arguments complained of on appeal were highly inappropriate, although they did not rise to the level of harmful, and thus reversible, error.