Case ID: so2d_483/html/0884-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph NAZZARO, Appellant, v. Mary R. Dupont, MOKSEL f/k/a Mary R. Dupont, Appellee.
    No. 84-2432.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 4, 1986.
    Joseph Nazzaro, in pro per.
    H. Allan Tucker, Hollywood, for appel-lee.
    Before HENDRY, HUBBART and NES-BITT, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The parties entered into a stipulation for dismissal of the foreclosure action which contained a condition that the defendant pay the 1983 ad valorem taxes on the subject property by June 30, 1984. The defendant tendered payment of the taxes on June 29, 1984. For administrative reasons, however, the tax collector refused to accept payment until July 17, 1984, on which date the defendant paid the taxes in full. The plaintiff sought and obtained a final judgment of foreclosure on the basis of this default with regard to the tax payment. We find that equity requires that a defendant in foreclosure be excused where, as here, the defendant is technically in default due to circumstances beyond his control, the default is cured by the defendant as soon as practicably possible, and the default has not resulted in an impairment of the security. See Kreiss Potassium Phosphate Co. v. Knight, 98 Fla. 1004, 124 So. 751, 756 (1929); Schechtman v. Grobbel, 226 So.2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969); Overholser v. Theroux, 149 So.2d 582 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963). Accordingly, the final judgment of foreclosure is reversed.