Case ID: so2d_614/html/0049-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Robert Allen DRIGGERS, Thomas Haggerty, Appellees.
    No. 91-3226.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    March 10, 1993.
    Opinion Granting Certification of Question June 9, 1993.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Gary S. Ostrow of Law Office of Gary S. Ostrow, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee-Hag-gerty.
    Craig K. Satehell, Hollywood, for appel-lee-Driggers.
   PER CURIAM.

Having accepted jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.160, this court reverses the suppression order that was presented in this appeal for review, and remands the case to the trial court. See State v. Rochelle, 609 So.2d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ.,

concur.

ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION

We grant the motion and certify as questions of great public importance those certified in State v. Nevadomski, No. 92-0763, 1993 WL 64830 (Fla. 4th DCA March 10, 1993).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD, J., concur.

HERSEY, J., dissents without opinion.