Case ID: sw_294/html/0588-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MORROW, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOHNSON v. STATE.
    (No. 10884.)
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    May 4, 1927.
    Criminal law &wkey;>l036(l), 1054(1), 1090(8) — To justify consideration on appeal of receipt of evidence on trial, objection and exception at that time and presentation by bill of exceptions is essential.
    Where evidence was received without objection, receipt of evidence could not be considered on appeal, since objection and exception and presentation by bill of exceptions is essential to consideration of receipt of evidence on trial.
    Appeal from District Court, Kaufman County; Joel R. Bond, Judge.
    William Johnson was convicted of transporting intoxicating liquor, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    W. C. Hensley, of Dallas, for appellant.
    Sam D. Stinson, State’s Atty., and Robt. M. Lyles, Asst. State’s Atty., both of Austin, for the State.
   MORROW, P. J.

The offense is transporting intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years..

The evidence is definite to the point that the appellant was transporting whisky in an automobile.

There are no bills of exceptions complaining of the introduction of testimony. The evidence having been received without objection, the complaint that the officers searched the appellant’s car without a warrant is not tenable. To justify consideration on appeal of the .receipt of evidence on the trial, objection and exception at that time and presentation by bill of exceptions is essential.

The judgment is affirmed.