Case ID: ad2d_39/html/0621-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Claim of Hyman Kirschenbaum, Appellant, v. Reliable Plastics Corp. et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
   Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed April 15, 1971. The board affirmed the Referee’s finding of no compensable lost time, determining that appellant’s income from corporate respondent was salary for services performed. This amount exceeds a sum represented by the established average weekly wage. There is substantial evidence to support this determination and to reject appellant’s contention that a portion of this income represented profits and not earnings (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 15, subd. 5-a). Matter of Roberge v. United Bd. & Carton Corp. (21 A D 2d 713) is clearly distinguishable on its facts and does not require a contrary result. The issue presented being essentially one of fact, we are bound by the board’s determination (Matter of Kopec v. Buffalo Brake Beam-Acme Steel & Malleable Iron Works, 304 N. Y. 65). Decision affirmed, without costs. Staley, Jr., J. P., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Reynolds, JJ., concur.