Case ID: f-appx_559/html/0516-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Chief Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Layla DARYIOSH, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 13-2146.
    United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
    May 16, 2014.
    Before: BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; BOGGS and WHITE, Circuit Judges.
   ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Chief Judge.

In this diversity action, Appellant Layla Daryiosh alleges that she suffered multiple injuries when she slipped and fell on a puddle in Target’s store in Warren, Michigan. The district court granted Target’s motion for summary judgment due to insufficient evidence of notice to support Daryiosh’s claim of negligence. After carefully reviewing the record, the applicable law, and the parties’ briefs, we are convinced that the district court did not err in its conclusions. The district court’s opinion carefully and correctly sets out the law governing the issues raised and clearly articulates the reasons underlying its decision. Thus, issuance of a full written opinion by this court would serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion, we AFFIRM.