Case ID: ohio-st-3d_84/html/0534-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Lundberg Stratton, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cheek, Respondent, v. Industrial Powder Coatings, Inc. et al., Petitioners.
    [Cite as Cheek v. Indus. Powder Coatings, Inc. (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 534.]
    (No. 97-1962
    Submitted February 10, 1999
    Decided March 10, 1999.)
    
      Reese M. Wineman, for respondent.
    
      Ziegler, Metzger & Miller L.L.P., Stephen M. Bales and John E. Redeker, for petitioners.
   Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII, the United States District Court certified the question of “Whether an individual employee, not otherwise deemed to be an ‘employer’ under the statute, may be individually liable for alleged violations of the employment discrimination provisions of the Ohio Civil Rights Act, Ohio Rev.Code §§ 4112.01(A)(2), 4112.02(A) & 4112.99?”

Our response is in the affirmative. See Genaro v. Gent. Transport, Inc. (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 293, 703 N.E.2d 782.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I disagree with the majority for the reasons set out in the dissenting opinions in Genaro v. Cent. Transport, Inc. (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 293, 703 N.E.2d 782. I would hold that the General Assembly intended R.C. Chapter 4112 to impose liability only on employers, not on an employer’s managers or supervisors. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.