Case ID: f-appx_245/html/0668-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry DORAN, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-10667.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 13, 2007.
    
    Filed Aug. 21, 2007.
    
      Michael K. Kawahara, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Honolulu, HI, for PlaintiffAppellee.
    Georgia K. McMillen, Esq., Wailuku Maui, HI, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jerry Doran appeals from the 108-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B), assaulting, resisting or impeding law enforcement officers, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111(a), and willfully committing damage to a government vehicle, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1361. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Doran contends that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court erred by exercising its discretion and imposing a sentence outside of the Guidelines range due to Doran’s reckless conduct. We disagree. We conclude that the district court properly considered the § 3553(a) factors. Given the facts of Doran’s case, we conclude that the sentence was not unreasonable. See United States v. Mohamed, 459 F.3d 979, 988-89 (9th Cir.2006).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.