Case ID: so3d_192/html/0546-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Natalie LEROUX, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee.
    No. 5D15-1039.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    May 13, 2016.
    Rehearing Denied June 3, 2016.
    Nicholas A. Vidoni,- of Watson, Soileau, Deleo, Burgett & Pickles, P.A., Cocoa, for Appellant.
    Nancy M. Wallace, of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee; William P. Heller, of Aker-man LLP, Fort Lauderdale; and Celia C. Falzone, of Akerman LLP, Jacksonville, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We conclude that under the facts of this case, the trial court abused its discretion in denying the unopposed motion to vacate foreclosure sale. The record reflects that the parties had not engaged in dilatory tactics and- that granting the motion would not have unduly interfered with the efficient administration of justice. See Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Lupica, 36 So.3d 875, 876 (Fla. 6th DCA 2010).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PALMER, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.