Case ID: so3d_162/html/0064-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kenneth N. HEBERT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D12-2965.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Aug. 13, 2014.
    Kenneth N. Hebert, Bonifay, pro se.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   On Motion for Rehearing

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for rehearing, we grant the motion in part and withdraw this court’s per curiam affir-mance dated June 12, 2014. The attached opinion is substituted therefor.

Kenneth N. Hebert appeals the denial of his amended Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. He raised two grounds within his amended motion. The trial court summarily denied ground one and scheduled ground two for an evidentiary hearing. That ground included two points; however, only the first was the subject of the evidentiary hearing and the order that followed. As a result, the trial court failed to rule on the second point within that ground. While we affirm the trial court’s disposition of ground one and the point addressed at the evidentiary hearing, we reverse and remand for the trial court to consider the remaining claim within ground two. See McClendon v. State, 862 So.2d 945 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). See also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(8)(C).

Affirmed in part, reversed and remanded in part.

WARNER, STEVENSON and LEVINE, JJ., concur.