Case ID: f-appx_101/html/0407-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gieday BAHILU, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 03-2285.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 28, 2004.
    Decided: June 25, 2004.
    Oti W. Nwosu, Arthur D. Wright, III, The Wright Law Network, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner.
    Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Senior Litigation Counsel, John D. Williams, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Gieday Bahilu, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reconsider its previous order denying her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Bahilu’s motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2003) (setting forth standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Bahilu, No. [ AXX-XXXXXX ] (B.I.A. Sept. 26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED