Case ID: ga-app_30/html/0013-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodwortii, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

14065.
    Harrison v. The State.
    Decided March 6, 1923.
    Accusation of using opprobrious words; from city court of Jesup — Judge Clark., October 13, 1922.
    
      James B. Thomas & Son, for plaintiff in error.
    
      W. B. Gibbs, solicitor, contra.
   Bloodwortii, J.

The grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new

trial are without merit; the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict of the jury; their finding has the approval of the trial judge, and the judgment is Affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luhe, J., concur.