Case ID: so2d_156/html/0841-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM. DREW, Justice O’CONNELL, Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

W. P. TYSON et al., Appellants, v. Wade H. LANIER, Jr., Osceola County Tax Assessor, et al., Appellees.
    No. 32180.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    June 5, 1963.
    Rehearing Denied July 15, 1963.
    Daniel J. LeFevre, Warrick, Cargill & LeFevre, Winter Park, Warren E. Hall, Jr., DeLand, Chesterfield H. Smith, Helen C. Ellis and Holland, Bevis, & Smith, Bartow, for appellants.
    Murray W. Overstreet, Jr., and Russell' S. Thacker, of Thacker & Thacker, Kissim-mee, for appellees.
    Paul & Sams, Miami, M. W. Well's-, R. F. Maguire, Jr., of Maguire, Voorhis & Wells, Orlando, Doyle E. Carlton of Mabry, Reaves, Carlton, Fields & Ward and Counts Johnson, Tampa, amici curias.
   PER CURIAM.

The record and briefs in this cause have been examined. The questions raised are the same as those raised in the companion case of Tyson et al. v. W. Lanier, Fla., 156 So.2d 833, which was consolidated with this case for purposes of review, one of said cases having been by appeal and the other review by certiorari. The matter having been disposed of by certiorari, the appeal in this case is accordingly dismissed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, THORNAL and CALL-WELL, JJ., concur.

DREW and O'CONNELL, JJ., dissent.

DREW, Justice

(dissenting-).

I would affirm decision of district court of appeal.

O’CONNELL, Justice

(dissenting).

I would affirm decision of district court of appeal.