Case ID: so2d_498/html/0629-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joe R. CURRAN, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PROBATION AND PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee.
    No. BK-306.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Dec. 8, 1986.
    Joe R. Curran, pro se.
    No appearance for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The denial of appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus is affirmed. However, as in Harris v. State, 486 So.2d 27 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), we certify the following as being a question of great public importance:

DOES SECTION 57.081 FLA.STAT. AUTHORIZE OR REQUIRE THAT INDIGENT APPELLANTS IN NONCRIMINAL APPEALS BE PROVIDED WITH TRANSCRIPTS AT NO COST TO THEM?

ERVIN, NIMMONS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.