Case ID: so2d_674/html/0918-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jean HEGEL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 94-2617.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 5, 1996.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Sheryl J. Lowenthal, Special Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Sylvie Perez Posner, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

There is no merit in the defendant’s various claims of trial error and the convictions below are therefore affirmed. Because, however, of admitted errors in the guidelines calculations, the cause is remanded for resen-tencing upon a properly calculated score-sheet.