Case ID: ohio-st-3d_39/html/0337-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. O’Neill.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. O’Neill (1988), 39 Ohio St. 3d 337.]
    (No. D.D. 88-13
    — Submitted September 8, 1988 —
    Decided November 16, 1988.)
    
      
      J. Warren Bettis, disciplinary counsel, and Mark H. Aultman, for relator.
    
      Anthony G. Ellis, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The record substantiates that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3) and 1-102(A)(4). Accordingly, we concur in the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.