Case ID: ad_234/html/0786-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edward J. Cassent, Respondent, v. Viktoria Utyro, Appellant.
   Order modified by striking therefrom the words “ Ordered that the counterclaim be and the same is dismissed; and it is further,” and by providing that, in addition to paragraphs 6, 7, 8 and 9, paragraph 15 be stricken out. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. Paragraphs 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20 constitute a counterclaim and they should not have been stricken out. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.