Case ID: pa_568/html/0599-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. Justice CAPPY.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

798 A.2d 1276
    John Douglas WOOD, Appellee, v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, Appellant.
    No. 88-MAP-2000.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    June 18, 2002.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of June 2002, we reverse the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County and reinstate the license suspension. See Scott v. Commonwealth, Deft of Transp., 567 Pa. 631, 790 A.2d 291 (2002); Crooks v. Commonwealth, Dep’t of Transp., 564 Pa. 436, 768 A.2d 1106 (2001); Harrington v. Commonwealth, Dep’t of Transp., 563 Pa. 565, 763 A.2d 386 (2000).

Justice CAPPY files a Concurring and Dissenting Statement, in which Chief Justice ZAPPALA joins.

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING STATEMENT

Justice CAPPY.

I concur in the court’s per curiam order reversing the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County. However, I dissent to the court reinstating Appellee John Douglas Wood’s license suspension. In accordance with this court’s recent decision in Harrington v. Commonwealth Dep’t of Transportation, 563 Pa. 565, 763 A.2d 386, 393-94 (2000), I believe that the matter should be remanded for consideration of ancillary non-constitutional issues that were raised and preserved for review.

Chief Justice ZAPPALA joins this concurring and dissenting statement.