Case ID: ohio-st-3d_75/html/1493-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Tuesday, May 28, 1996
    
    MERIT DOCKET
    96-1171.
    Northeast Ohio Apt. Assn. v. Eighth Dist. Court of Appeals.
   In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ.,

dissent because they would wait for a response, then proceed with a determination under S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5).