Case ID: so2d_264/html/0073-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marion Kay E. KOPLON, Appellant, v. Stanley SMITH et al., Appellees.
    No. 71-879.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 13, 1972.
    Rehearing Denied July 12, 1972.
    Roy S. Wood, Jr., for appellant.
    E. Randell Beider, Phillip A. Brook and Irwin Oster, Miami Beach, for appellees.
    Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ-
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant defendant has appealed from an entry of an amended final judgment granting specific performance of her contract to sell her home to appellee-plaintiffs. We find that the evidence was sufficient to support the judgment, as the appellant breached the contract for sale. Further, there is no evidence in the record to support appellant’s position that the instant property met the qualifications for the homestead exemption for forced sale. Article 10 § 4 Florida Constitution of 1968, F.S.A.

We have considered the record, briefs and arguments of counsel in the light of the controlling principles of law, and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated.

Affirmed.