Case ID: ind_156/html/0704-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Baker, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Schaefer v. Werling et al.
    [No. 19,146.
    Filed April 17, 1901.
    Rehearing denied June 20, 1901.]
    From the Huntington Circuit Court.
    
      Affirmed.
    
    
      S. M. Sayler and B. F. Ibach, for appellant.
    
      W. H Hart and J. Q. Cline, for appellees. .
   Baker, J.

As the ground for reversal, appellant contends that the “Barrett law” is unconstitutional. The majority of the court held otherwise in Adams v. City of Shelbyville, 154 Ind. 467. On the authority of that decision, the judgment is affirmed.