Case ID: us_287/html/0561-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 34.
    Rhodes et al. v. Twing et al.
    Jurisdictional statement submitted September 15, 1932.
    Decided October 10, 1932.
    
      Mr. Oliver J. Todd for appellants. Mr. Jewell P. Lightfoot for appellees.
   Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a properly presented federal question. Godchaux v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179, 181; Jett Bros. Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 6, 7; Citizens National Bank v. Durr, 257 U. S. 99, 106; Hooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 116, 117; Live Oak Water Users Assn. v. Railroad Commission, 269 U. S. 354, 357.