Case ID: f-appx_26/html/0329-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gene JOHNSON, Deputy Director; David A. Garraghty, Chief Warden; Rufus Fleming, Regional Director; S. Avent, Associate Warden; Belinda Caraballo, Unit Manager; Sergeant Hayhurst, Investigator; R. Bailey, Lab Technician, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 01-7244.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 31, 2002.
    Decided Feb. 6, 2002.
    Charles Wright, Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Charles Wright appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wright v. Johnson, No. CA-01-215-3 (E.D.Va. July 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.