Case ID: so2d_554/html/0673-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William Harris SNELLING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 89-37.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Jan. 11, 1990.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and James R. Wulchak, Chief, Appellate Div., Office of the Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The departure sentence imposed, based on factors relating to the violation of probation, is vacated on the authority of Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d 851 (Fla.1989); Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989); see also, Dewberry v. State, 546 So.2d 409 (Fla.1989); Phillips v. State, 550 So.2d 1189 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); and Branton v. State, 548 So.2d 882 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). The cause is remanded for resen-tencing within the recommended guidelines range. See Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987); see also Branton, supra. The trial court may (but need not) bump up one cell. Franklin v. State, supra; Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)14.

SENTENCE VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.