Case ID: pa_606/html/0521-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

2 A.3d 473
    Mr. Carlos ROYSTER a.k.a. Mr. Carlos Muhammad, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondent.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Aug. 12, 2010.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of August, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, Petition to Supplement and Amend, and “Petition to Supplement and Support All Contentions Stated in the Aforementioned Brief, Petition for Allowance of Appeal and Petition to Supplement and Amend Which is the Second Titled Petition Submitted to This Honorable Court” are denied.