Case ID: ohio-st-3d_60/html/0043-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jackson, Appellant, v. City of Cleveland, Appellee.
    [Cite as Jackson v. Cleveland (1991), 60 Ohio St. 3d 43.]
    (No. 90-1739 —
    Submitted January 22, 1991 —
    Decided May 29, 1991.)
    
      
      Jesse R. Jackson, pro se.
    
    
      Mark A. McClain, chief prosecutor, and Edward T. Buelo, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

We overrule appellee’s motion to dismiss and proceed to consideration on the merits.

In his brief, appellant argues matters germane to his criminal conviction and appeal — invalid warrant, discovery rights, and right to a new trial. None of these issues relates to the mandamus action at issue. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.