Case ID: sc_140/html/0051-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Cothran.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

11510
    SANDEL v. STATE
    (133 S. E., 709)
    Appeal ajtd Error. — Questions raised on former appeal, and considered and decided by Court eri banc, are res adjudicata.
    
    Before Bonham, J., Richland.
    Affirmed.
    Action by J. O’Neal Sandel, as administrator, against the State. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      
      Messrs. Graydon & Graydon, for appellant.
    
      Messrs. S. M. Wolfe and Alva M. Lumpkin, for respondent.
    May 13, 1924.
   The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, after the case had been remanded to the Circuit Court for a new trial, under the opinion reported in 126 S. C., 1; 119 S. E., 776. The exceptions raise only questions which have already been raised, considered, and decided by the Court en banc, and are res adjudicata.

The judgment of-this Court is that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Watts, Fraser and Marion concur.

Mr. Chief Justice Gary did not participate.