Case ID: f-appx_491/html/0100-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Jovan LADSON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 12-10078
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Oct. 2, 2012.
    Mark Dispoto, Jason Linder, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Wifre-do A. Ferrer, Anne Ruth Schultz, Alejandro Oscar Soto, Arimentha R. Walkins, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Richard Carroll Klugh, Jr., Attorney at Law, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before WILSON, HILL and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Richard Klugh, appointed counsel for James Jovan Ladson, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ladson’s sentences are AFFIRMED.