Case ID: f-appx_339/html/0289-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard Powers LINCOLN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Daniel E. BAILEY, Sheriff; Aramark Corporation; B. Smith Scott; L. Pagen, Major; M. Smith, Captain; J. Ploger, Captain; J. Maness, Sergeant; D. Truesdale, Sergeant; G. Rogers, Sergeant; P. Igwesi, Detention Officer; J. Sage, Detention Officer; K. Johnson, Detention Officer; C. Smith, Detention Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 09-6602.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 30, 2009.
    Decided: Aug. 5, 2009.
    Richard Powers Lincoln, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Richard Powers Lincoln appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lincoln v. Bailey, No. 3:09-cv-00058-GCM (W.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.