Case ID: sw3d_539/html/0740-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Penny E. JOHNSTON, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Roy R. JOHNSTON, Jr., Respondent/Appellant.
    No. ED 105188
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: October 17, 2017 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied December 19, 2017
    Edward L. Campbell, 1902 S. Baltimore, Suite 400, Kirksville, MO 63501, For Petitioner/Respondent.
    William P. Nacy, 522 E. Capitol Avenue, Jefferson City, MO 65101, For Respondent/Appellant.
    Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Roy R. Johnston, Jr. (Father) appeals from the trial court's October 13, 2016 Judgment and Order of Modification and Judgment for Contempt awarding Penny Johnston (Mother) sole legal custody of their child, R., and adjudging Father in contempt for repeatedly failing to comply with the court's past orders to have Mother's name removed from a debt incurred on a trailer awarded to Father in the 2008 dissolution of marriage judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's judgment is well within its discretion and is supported by substantial evidence. Morgan v. Morgan, 497 S.W.3d 359, 372 (Mo. App. E.D. 2016) ; Davidson v. Fisher, 96 S.W.3d 160, 164 (Mo. App. W.D. 2003). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).