Case ID: njl_94/html/0278-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OE NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM TIETJEN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted December 8, 1919
    Decided March 1, 1920.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 93 N. J. L. 22.
    For the defendant in error, Pierre P. Ganen.
    
    For the plaintiff in error, Alexander Simpson.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein, should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—Tire Chancellor, Parker, Bergen, Mixteen, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 12.

For reversal—iSTone.