Case ID: f-appx_41/html/0914-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Darren Eugene SHERMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ernest C. ROE, Warden; California Attorney General; Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 00-55975.
    D.C. No. CV-98-00172-AHS.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 11, 2002.
    
    Decided July 16, 2002.
    Before KOZINSKI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and MAHAN, District Judge.
    
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
    
      
      The Honorable James C. Mahan, United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

We affirm the denial of Sherman’s habeas petition for reasons stated in Magistrate Judge Zarefsky’s Report and Recommendation and adopted by the district court.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.