Case ID: fla_145/html/0705-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George Oscar Harris, Appellant, v. Louise Lough Harris, Appellee.
    200 So. 78
    En Banc
    Opinion Filed January 28, 1941
    
      O. B. White and Edmund B. Sigman, for Appellant-;
    
      Joe Brown Booth and Irving Ellsworth Lewis, for-Appellee. ■ ■ . !
   Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the final decree herein, and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and. inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said final decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said final decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. We do not approve the bill of complaint but it was not attacked and is sufficient to support the decree.

Affirmed.

Brown, C. J.; Whitfield, Chapman, Thomas and Adams, J. J., concur. ■’

Terrell and Buford, J. J., dissent.