Case ID: sw2d_978/html/0444-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dr. Lanny S. ODIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LASER VISION CENTERS, INC. and Medical Care International, Inc., Defendants-Respondents.
    No. 73595.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Sept. 1, 1998.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 26, 1998.
    Application for Transfer Denied Nov. 24, 1998.
    The Stolar Partnership, H. Kent Munson, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Dankenbring, Greiman, Osterholt & Hoffman, P.C., Gerald P. Greiman, Craig A. Wilson, St. Louis, for Laser Vision.
    Armstrong, Teasdale, Schlafly & Davis, Jay A. Summerville, Matthew H. Armstrong, St. Louis, for Medical Care.
    Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., and SIMON and HOFF, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dr. Lanny S. Odin appeals the trial court’s judgment entered in favor of Medical Care International, Inc. and Laser Vision Centers, Inc. upon consideration of the parties’ motions for summary judgment in this damages action. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential or jurisprudential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).