Case ID: nj-eq_125/html/0346-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Margaret A. Brands, complainant-respondent, v. Florence E. Cassedy, Clark B. Cassedy, Mary C. Brands and Blanche C. Brands, defendants-appellants.
    [Submitted February term, 1939.
    Decided April 21st, 1939.]
    
      Mr. George O. Winne, for the defendants-appellants.
    
      Mr. Claude E. Coolc, for the complainant-respondent.
   Pee Curiam.

We have carefully examined the pleading and proofs in this case, the arguments of counsel and the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor, and we are of the opinion that his conclusions as to the facts and his application of the law thereto were in all respects proper.

The decree is affirmed.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chibe-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.