Case ID: ad2d_40/html/0685-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William Holsten, an Infant, by His Parent and Guardian, Mary Holsten, et al., Appellants, v. Thomas J. Maloney, Respondent.
   In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated August 19, 1971, which denied their motion for a general preference. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements,, and motion granted. In our opinion, from the facts adduced, it would appear that a general preference is warranted. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Munder and Latham, JJ., concur; Shapiro, J., not "voting.