Case ID: ad2d_297/html/0711-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lisa Linder, Respondent, v Ronald M. Linder, Appellant.
    [748 NYS2d 599]
   A party seeking downward modification of the child support terms of a stipulation of settlement must establish an unanticipated and unreasonable change in circumstances, and also must establish that such change was substantial (see Praeger v Praeger, 162 AD2d 671). The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for downward modification. Even assuming the defendant, a medical doctor, is unable to perform surgery, the defendant did not establish that he diligently sought employment commensurate with his qualifications and experience (see Yepes v Fichera, 230 AD2d 803).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Schmidt, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.