Case ID: f-appx_474/html/0199-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joshua Latron GALLISHAW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer DELOACH; Officer Williamson; Sgt Hicks; Capt Best; Warden Cohen; Major Nln; Sgt Marquez; Sgt Housey; Lt Housey; SCDC Director, and other unknown John Does, Janes Does, individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 12-6730.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 14, 2012.
    Decided: June 20, 2012.
    Joshua Latron Gallishaw, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel F. Arthur, III, Aiken, Bridges, Nunn, Elliott & Tyler, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    
      ' Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joshua Latron Gallishaw appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gallishaw v. DeLoach, No. 9:11-cv-00404-CMC, 2012 WL 881854 (D.S.C. Feb. 16) & (Apr. 2, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.