Case ID: pa-super_217/html/0388-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam, Hoffman, J.:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Commonwealth v. Havel, Appellant.
    Submitted September 14, 1970.
    Before Wright, P. J., Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, and Cercone, JJ.
    
      
      Francis Wright and John W. Packet, Assistant Defenders, and Vincent J. Ziccardi, Acting Defender, for appellant.
    
      George J. D’Ambrosio and Milton M. Stein, Assistant District Attorneys, James D. Crawford, Deputy District Attorney, Richard A. Sprague, First Assistant District Attorney, and Arlen Specter, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
    November 13, 1970:
   Opinion

Per Curiam,

Order affirmed.

Dissenting Opinion by

Hoffman, J.:

For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Commonwealth v. Sheehan, 216 Pa. Superior Ct. 26, 260 A. 2d 496 (1969), I would reverse the order of the lower court and order a new trial.