Case ID: ga_111/html/0872-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Fish, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Atlanta Machine Works v. Pope & Dye et al.
    
    Submitted July 24, —
    Decided August 8, 1900.
    ■ Complaint. Before Judge Gober. Cherokee superior court. August 23, 1899.
    
      Mozley Sc Griffin, for plaintiff.
    
      Tedsley Sc Hutcherson, for defendants.
   Fish, J.

1. Grounds of a motion for a new trial which are not approved by the trial judge can not be considered by this court.

2. It is not erroneous for the trial judge to refuse to give a request to charge when such request is not in writing.

3. There was no material error in the charges excepted to, the evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict, and there was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.