Case ID: ill_56/html/0283-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

P. F. W. Peck et al. and Azel Dorathy v. The City of Chicago.
    
    Appeals from the Superior Court of Chicago.
    These were suits in the cotirt below, for taxes, in which judgments were rendered against the several defendants, who thereupon took these appeals.
    
      
       This and thirteen other cases against the city of Chicago, all involving the same questions, were considered together. The parties appealing in the other cases were as follows: Charles Follansbee; Cornelia W. Storey et al.; Potter Palmer et al.; Azel Dorathy; S. J. McCormick et al. and Martin O. Walker; John C. Haines et al.; William Wheeler et al. and Edgar Loomis et al.; Moses Grey and W. H. Adams; N. B. Smith et al. and A. D. Rich; R. McClelland et al. and Martin O. Walker; L. C. P. Freer and Azel Dorathy; Martin O. Walker et al.; Martin O. Walker.
    
   Per Curiam:

All the questions presented by the records in these cases, and discussed, are decided in the case of Dunham v. The City of Chicago, 55 Ill. 357, and must be disposed of in the same way.

Judgment affirmed.