Case ID: f-appx_305/html/0430-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Benjamin CANEZ, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 07-10577.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 17, 2008.
    
    Filed Dec. 29, 2008.
    Claire Kiehl Lefkowitz, Esq., USTUOffice of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Natman Schaye, Esq., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Benjamin Canez appeals from the 25-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Canez contends that it was unreasonable for the district court to impose an above-Guidelines range sentence pursuant to the departure provision set forth in U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4 Application Note 3, and that the sentence is also unreasonable in light of the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. We conclude that the sentence is reasonable. See United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1176 (9th Cir.2006); United States v. Mohamed, 459 F.3d 979, 986-87 (9th Cir.2006).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.