Case ID: cai_2/html/0367-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

*Jackson, ex dem. Jackway and Russell, against Stiles; Williams, tenant.
    If a person be admitted defendant in ejectment, and keep out of the -way to avoid service of the ca. sa. against the casual ejector, the court will grant a rule to show cause why an attachment should not issue, of which service at the house of the defendant will be sufficient.
    It was ruled, that if a person be admitted to defend on payment of costs, and, after entering into the consent rule, keep out of the way to avoid being served with a copy of the ca. sa. against the casual ejector, a rule will be granted to show cause why an attachment should not go against aim, and that service of that rule at the defendant’s house shall be sufficient.