Case ID: f-appx_347/html/0326-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Allen McMILLION, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-30472.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 14, 2009.
    
    Filed Oct. 2, 2009.
    
      Marcia Good Hurd, Esq., USBI — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    David A. Duke, Esq., Law Office of David A. Duke, Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Mark Allen MeMillion appeals from the 188-month sentence imposed by the district court, following his jury-trial conviction for violations of the Mann and Transportation Acts, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1952, 2421, 2422(a), 2423(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

The record supports the conclusion that the district court found unique vulnerability and did not clearly err in imposing the U.S.S.G § 3A1.1 enhancement given the victim’s small size and stature and history of sexual assault and abandonment. See United States v. Williams, 291 F.3d 1180, 1196 (9th Cir.2002) (per curiam), overruled on other grounds by United States v. Gonzales, 506 F.3d 940 (9th Cir.2007).

AFFIRMED. 
      
      
         This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.