Case ID: nc_187/html/0860-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GILLILAND STIKELEATHER et al. v. ASHEVILLE PARK COMPANY.
    (Filed 31 May, 1924.)
    Appeal by plaintiff from McElroy, J., at September Term, 1923, of Buncombe.
    
      Martin, Rollins & Wright and Marcus Erwin for plaintiffs.
    
    
      Marie W. Brown for defendant.
    
   Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs brought suit to recover certain commissions alleged to be due for services rendered the defendant in the sale of land. At .the close of the evidence the judge dismissed the action as in ease of nonsuit, and tbe plaintiff appealed.' The evidence covers more than sixty printed pages and a minute statement of the portion most favorable to the plaintiff need not be made. It is sufficient to say that while we express no opinion as to the weight of the evidence, we think there was more than a scintilla to sustain the plaintiff’s contention. The judgment is

Reversed.