Case ID: nev_90/html/0112-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SILVITA ROUSEAU, Appellant, v. JAKE DIELEMAN and JAKE’S CRANE & RIGGING, INC., A Corporation, Respondents.
    No. 7212
    March 26, 1974
    519 P.2d 1135
    
      
      Eric Zubel, of Las Vegas, for Appellant.
    
      Ralph L. Denton, of Las Vegas, for Respondents.
   OPINION

Per Curiam:

We find no reversible error in the trial court’s order, which dismissed plaintiff’s action pursuant to NRCP 41(b), after presentation of her evidence. On review of the record, we believe the trial judge could properly determine, not only that plaintiff failed to prove any actual damage by reason of the defendants’ alleged trespass upon her land, but also that she failed to prove either of them was indeed responsible for the alleged trespass.

Affirmed.