Case ID: teiss_2/html/0007-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DUFOUR, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 3473.
    (Court of Appeal, Parish of Orleans.)
    WIDOW ISAAC LICHENTAG vs. M. FEITEL, et al. LAMBERT BROS. vs. MRS. I. LICHENTAG, et al. FRANK KEFF vs. J. H. PETRIE, et al.
    1. All parties to the suit who are not appellants are appellees, and ali are concluded by the judgment rendered on appeal. A second appeal eatlftot be allowed.
    Appeal from Civil District Court, Division “BY
    H. W. Robinson, for Lambert Bros and Fred Keff, Appellant,
    E. H. MeCaleb and A. B. Leopold, 'for Appellees.
    May 16, 1904.
    Rehearing refused March 20, Í905.
   DUFOUR, J.

The present appellants were appellees in suit No. 322!, recently decided, and that decision exhausted our ap-pelate jurisdiction in the premises.

No review cafl now he had of a judgment, which could have been had on the first appeal, either by motion to amend or be becoming appellants.

Arts. 888-889 C. P.

42 An. 441, 48 A. 351, 105 La. 309.

The first decision concludes both appellants and appellees,

Tire motion to dismiss must prevail.