Case ID: sw3d_144/html/0887-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jimi T. COOPERWOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 82914.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Sept. 28, 2004.
    Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Leslie E. McNamara, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jimi Cooperwood appeals the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).