Case ID: f-appx_599/html/0253-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antoinne GOODLOE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 14-5627.
    United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
    April 14, 2015.
    Before: NORRIS, SUTTON, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

In 2008, Antoinne Goodloe pleaded guilty to a crack-related offense. See 21 U.S.C. § 846. He received a 121-month sentence, one month above the then-applicable mandatory minimum. After the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 lowered that minimum to sixty months, Goodloe moved for a sentence reduction. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The district court obliged him one month, but refused to apply the new minimum retroactively. That refusal, Goodloe now argues, violates both the Act and the Constitution. But United States v. Blewett, 746 F.3d 647, 650 (6th Cir.2013) (en banc), holds otherwise. Because the old minimum still applies to his case, Good-loe received the. maximum reduction the law permits.

For these reasons, we affirm.