Case ID: nd_52/html/0672-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Burke, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. H. WISHEK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM HILDENBRAND as Mayor, and Christ Spitzer, Christ Schock, C. J. Eisenbeisz, Reinhold Schaber, John Schmidt, L. Walker, as Members of the City Council of the City of Ashley, McIntosh County, North Dakota, and the City of Ashley, McIntosh County, North Dakota, a Municipal Corporation, Appellants.
    (204 N. W. 364.)
    Controlled by prior case.
    This case is governed by tlio decision rendered in Enderson v. Hildenbrand et ai. ante, 533, decided at this tenn.
    Opinion filed May 2, 1925.
    Rehearing denied May 25, 1925.
    
      Appeal from the District Court of McIntosh County, Wolfe, J.
    Affirmed.
    
      Fronz Shubech, for appellants.
    
      Sekneller, Heder, .& Schneller and Purcell & Slallery, amicus cruda?.
    
      Wished- & 'Wishelc, A. A. Liulwigs, Lauder & Lauder, and II. P. Pe mhu¡Ion, for respondent.
   Burke, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff, under chapter ll¿ of the Session Laws of 1923, to disconnect 160 acres of land belonging to the plaintiff from the city of Ashley in the county of McIntosh and State of North Dakota. The petition, proof of hearing of .petition before the city council, decision of tire city council, and the decision of the judge of the district court on certiorari, are in all things tic same as in the case of Enderson v. Hildebrand, ante, 533, decided at this term, and which decision governs and controls the decision in this case. The decision of the lower court on certiorari is in all things affirmed.

hbtstiaNsoN, Oh. J., and Birukeel, JoiiNsoN, and Nuessue, JL, concur.