Case ID: so2d_507/html/0774-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Maude S. VINCENT, Appellant, v. Mathieu VINCENT, Appellee.
    No. 86-1830.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 26, 1987.
    Rehearing Denied June 23, 1987.
    Louise H. McMurray, Miami, for appellant.
    Walters, Costanzo, Russell, Zyne & Newman and Mark Newman, Miami, for appel-lee.
    Before HENDRY, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Because the husband failed to request an award of special equity, Gleason v. Gleason, 453 So.2d 941 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Stetson v. Stetson, 356 So.2d 53 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); see Hernandez v. Hernandez, 444 So.2d 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), review denied, 451 So.2d 848 (Fla.1984), and failed to prove his entitlement to a special equity, see Vandegrift v. Vandegrift, 477 So.2d 638 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Gregg v. Gregg, 474 So.2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Smith v. Smith, 428 So.2d 276, 279 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (on rehearing), we reverse that portion of the Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage granting the husband a special equity in various assets. Our disposition of this issue makes it unnecessary to reach the remaining issues raised by appellant.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.