Case ID: f-appx_442/html/0071-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Derek N. JARVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDEX OFFICE & PRINT SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 11-1214.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 25, 2011.
    Decided: Aug. 2, 2011.
    Derek N. Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. David Samuel Panzer, Eric C. Rowe, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Derek N. Jarvis appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider and granting summary judgment against him in his civil action. On appeal, Jarvis contests the denial of his motion to reconsider the court’s earlier denial of his spoliation of evidence claim, and the denial of his claim of discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jarvis v. FedEx Office & Print Servs., Inc., No. 08-1694, 2011 WL 826796 (D.Md. Mar. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.