Case ID: nj-eq_98/html/0687-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cuetam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bertha Baumann, appellant, v. Reginald B. Naugle et al., respondents.
    [Decided September 29th, 1925.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan, whose opinion is reported in 97 N. J. Eq. 110.
    
    
      Mr. Earl A. Merrill, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Augustus G. Nash, for the respondents.
   Pee Cuetam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

For affirmance- — The Chiee-Justice, Parker, Minturn, Kaltsoh, Black, Katzenbaoi-i, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Bus kirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.