Case ID: ga-app_29/html/0387-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

14063.
    Walden v. The State.
    Decided January 11, 1923.
    Accusation of possession of liquor;. from city court of Thomas-ville — Judge W. H- Hammond. October 6, 1922. ■ ,
    
      J. M.. Austin, Ira Carlisle, for plaintiff in error.
    
      H. J. MacIntyre, solicitor, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contains the usual general grounds only. The evidence relied upon for a conviction, while circumstantial, is sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.