Case ID: sw2d_945/html/0042-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Edward WESSELS, Appellant.
    No. 70054.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    April 29, 1997.
    John M. Schilmoeller, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Deborah Bell Yates, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before RHODES RUSSELL, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after sentencing on verdict on charge of forcible sodomy in violation of § 566.060 RSMo Cum.Supp.1993. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).