Case ID: del-cas_1/html/0377-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CONWELL’S LESSEE v. CONWELL.
    Supreme Court. Sussex.
    October, 1795.
    
      Bayard’s Notebook, 112.
      
    
    
      Peery and Miller for plaintiff. Ridgely and Bayard for defendant.
    
      
       This case is also reported in Wilson’s Red Book, 77.
    
   Per Curiam.

The affidavit is not evidence. It is ex parte and that objection is unanswerable. It being recorded adds nothing to its validity as a matter of evidence.

Affidavit rejected.