Case ID: f-appx_81/html/0666-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oliver MAIBEN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-50055.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 10, 2003.
    
    Decided Nov. 17, 2003.
    Ronald L. Cheng, Esq., Wesley L. Hsu, Esq., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Jerry D. Whatley, Santa Barbara, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: KOZINSKI, SILVERMAN and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Oliver Maiben, Jr. appeals the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release and imposing a 5-month prison term upon a finding that he had violated the conditions of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Maiben contends that he didn’t receive written notice of the conditions of his supervised release and therefore, his 5-month sentence should be vacated. Because the district court gave Maiben actual notice of the conditions which he is alleged to have violated and Maiben admitted to having violated a condition, we affirm the district court. See United States v. Ortega-Brito, 311 F.3d 1136, 1138-39 (9th Cir.2002) (concluding written notice was not required where a defendant received actual notice of the conditions of his release).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.