Case ID: f-appx_44/html/0861-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas D. PATRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul G. ROSENBLATT, et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 02-15421.
    D.C. No. CV-01-00330-KJD.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 12, 2000.
    
    Decided Aug. 19, 2002.
    Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Thomas D. Patrick appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his Bivens action against Arizona federal district court judges Paul G. Rosenblatt and Susan R. Bolton. The Nevada district court properly dismissed Patrick’s complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendants, Doe v. American Nat’l Red Cross, 112 F.3d 1048, 1050-52 (9th Cir.1997), and based upon absolute judicial immunity, Moore v. Brewster, 96 F.3d 1240, 1243-44 (9th Cir.1996). We reject Patrick’s pending motion as lacking merit.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.