Case ID: pa-super_41/html/0263-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Porter, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bergdoll v. Pitts, Appellant
    (No. 2).
    Argued Oct. 8, 1909.
    December 13, 1909:
    Appeal, No. 83, Oct. T., 1909, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1908, No. 5,409, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Louis J. Berg-doll v. Lillie H. Pitts.
    Before Rice, P. J., Porter, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Head and Beaver, JJ.
    Affirmed.
   Opinion by

Porter, J.,

The affidavit of defense, which in this case the court below held to be insufficient, is in all respects similar to that which we have considered in the case of Charles A. Bergdoll, guardian, v. Lillie H. Pitts, in which an opinion has this day been filed, ante, p. 257. We in that case held the affidavit to be insufficient and, for the reasons in that opinion stated, the specifications of error in this appeal are overruled.

The judgment is affirmed and the appeal dismissed.

Henderson and Morrison, JJ., dissent.