Case ID: wash_163/html/0704-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 23267.
    
      En Banc.
    
    July 2, 1931.]
    Charles F. Clise et al., Appellants, v. Harry W. Carroll et al., Respondents, M. A. Zioncheck et al., Interveners-Respondents.
      
    
    
      Preston, Thorgrimson & Turner, George Donioorth, and Philip D. Macbride, for appellants.
    
      A. C. Van Soelen and J. Ambler Newton, for respondents Harry W. Carroll and H. L. Collier.
    
      John F. Dore and William A. Gilmore, for interveners-respond-ents.
    
      
       Reported in 300 Pac. 1047.
    
   Per Curiam.

One of the judges of this court being incapacitated and absent on account of illness, this case was argued to the remaining eight judges sitting En Banc. These eight judges are divided in their opinions and there i,s no majority either for affirmance or for reversal.

Therefore the judgment of the lower court stands affirmed.