Case ID: f3d_786/html/0801-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John DOE I; John Doe II; John Doe III, individually and on behalf of proposed class members; Global Exchange, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NESTLE USA, INC.; Archer Daniels Midland Company; Cargill Incorporated Company; Cargill Cocoa, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 10-56739.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    May 22, 2015.
    Terrence Patrick Collingsworth, Esquire, Senior Partner, Conrad & Scherer, LLP, Washington, DC, Paul L. Hoffman,-Schonbrun Desimone Seplow Harris & Hoffman, Venice, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    Craig A. Hoover, Neal Katyal, Dominic Francis Perella, Esquire, Hogan Lovells U.S., LLP, Andrew John Pincus, Mayer Brown, LLP, Washington, DC, Julie A. Shepard, Jenner & Block, LLP, Brad D. Brian, Esquire, Daniel Paul Collins, Mun-ger, Tolies & Olson, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Jonathan H. Blavin, Kristin Linsley Myles, Esquire, Munger Tolies & Olson, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Lee H. Rubin, Mayer Brown, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
    
      Before: DOROTHY W. NELSON, KIM McLANE WARDLAW and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

The order denying the petition for rehearing/rehearing en banc, filed on May 6, 2015, is hereby redesignated as a published order.

SO ORDERED.