Case ID: ad_112/html/0910-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Clarke, J. :", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frederick P. Fox and Edward J. Keogh, Respondents, v. New York City Interborough Railway Company, Appellant.
    (No. 2.)
    Appeal from an order denying a motion for a reargument.
   Clarke, J. :

This was an appeal from an order denying a motion for a reargument of the' motion for the continuance of an injunction pendente lite herein. As upon appeal the original order continuing -the in j unction has been reversed by_ the order of this court, handed down with an opinion this day {ante, p. 832), it is only necessary to affirm the order herein appealed- from, without costs. Ingraham,-. McLaughlin, Laughlin and Houghton, JJ., concurred. Order affirmed, without Costs. Order filed.