Case ID: so2d_610/html/0734-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Naomi GREISDORF, Appellee.
    No. 90-2648.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Dec. 30, 1992.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Barbara J. Wolfe, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   AMENDED OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

By our Opinion on Motion for Rehearing of October 27, 1991, we denied rehearing but granted a stay of the mandate pending a decision in Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla.1992). The opinion in that case having now been issued, we grant rehearing in the present case, recall our original opinion of August 28, 1991, 587 So.2d 1153, and affirm the sentencing order rendered by the lower tribunal.

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and WARNER, JJ., concur.