Case ID: f-appx_171/html/0969-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ajamu Sawandi OSBORNE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. M.W. MURPHY; P. Jones, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 05-7623.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 23, 2006.
    Decided March 3, 2006.
    Ajamu Sawandi Osborne, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Mureier Bowens, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    
      Before WIDBNER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Ajamu Sawandi Osborne appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Bivens action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Osborne v. Murphy, No. CA-04-2368-8-MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED. 
      
      
        Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).