Case ID: f-appx_687/html/0283-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Larry HAMILTON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State Commonwealth of VIRGINIA; L. Pena; States Attorney, Jane Doe; Jeff Sheidon; Jamie Haddock; Police Officer, John Doe; Prince Williams County Police, Jane Doe et al.; John Doe; PWDC; Garret, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 17-1302
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 25, 2017
    Decided: April 28, 2017
    
      Larry Hamilton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
    Jeffrey Notz, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Prince William, Virginia, for Ap-pellees.
    Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larry Hamilton, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his amended civil rights complaints with prejudice as incomprehensible and untimely. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hamilton’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Hamilton has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED