Case ID: f-appx_430/html/0242-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jorge GEVARA, a/k/a Jorge Galeas, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Betty INPOLD, Defendant—Appellee, and Alvin William Keller, Jr.; Robert C. Lewis; Richard Neely; Lawrence Parsons; Jeffrey T. Smith; Judy Atwater; Dennis E. Marshall; D. House; J. Hyatt; E. Coleman, Defendants.
    No. 11-6279.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 19, 2011.
    Decided: May 24, 2011.
    Jorge Gevara, Appellant pro se.
    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Jorge Gevara seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motions for reconsideration and leave to amend his complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-7, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Gevara seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.