Case ID: nj-eq_79/html/0218-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary K. Hammell, appellant, v. Henry R. Barrett, respondent.
    [Submitted March 27th, 1911.
    Decided November 20th, 1911.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning, whose opinion is reported ante p. &S.
    
    
      Mr. William Harris, for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. Garrow & Kraft, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

So much of the decree as is involved in this appeal will be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance—Thu Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Bogert, Yeeden-BURGI-I, CONGDON—10.

For reversal—None.