Case ID: ad2d_12/html/0752-08.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Maxim Gashel et al., Respondents, v. Vladimir Z. Vicas, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
   Order entered June 17, 1960, denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency, unanimously affirmed, on the law and on the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondents. It is clear, and it was confirmed upon oral argument, that the conferences and conversations alleged by plaintiffs were not pleaded as specific acts constituting due and full performance, but to establish the chronology of events preceding and following the making of the agreement. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.