Case ID: f2d_38/html/1021-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Kitty JACKSON et al., Appellees.
    No. 5659.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    March 17, 1930.
    Geo. J. Hatfield, U. S. Atty., of San Francisco, .Cal., and Albert E. Sheets, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Sacramento, Cal.
    W. Ernest Dickson, of Eureka, Cal., for appellees.
    Before DIETRICH and WILBUR, Circuit Judges, and KERRIGAN, District Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

Ordered mandate of Supreme Court of the United States, 50 S. Ct. 143, answering question certified, filed, and decree entered in accordance therewith, reversing decree of District Court, 27 F.(2d) 751, and directing entry of decree in District Court in accordance with prayer of complaint.