Case ID: ohio-law-abs_6/html/0368-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "ROBINSON, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BELPASH et v. EMERINE
    Ohio Supreme Court.
    No. 20948
    Decided June 6, 1928.
    Error to Lucas Appeals.
    Judgment affirmed.
    725. LIMITATION OF ACTIONS.
    Benefits of 11233 GC., inure to plaintiff, demurrer to whose petition has been erroneously sustained.
   ROBINSON, J.

, „ , The benefits of Section 11233, General Code, inure to a plaintiff who has begun an action within the time limited by law for the commencement of such action, to whose petition a demurrer, upon the ground that it was not instituted within such time, has been erroneously sustained.

Marshall, CJ., Allen, Kinkade, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur. Day J. concurs in the judgment.