Case ID: f-appx_78/html/0937-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chad Everett MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-10358
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Oct. 23, 2003.
    Linda Marie Dedman, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee. .
    Jason Douglas Hawkins, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before SMITH, DEMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Chad Everett Martin (“Martin”) appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for embezzlement of United States mail by a postal employee. Martin argues that the district court’s amount of intended loss determination was erroneous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Given the paucity of evidence submitted by Martin at sentencing and the information contained in the pre-sentence report, Martin has not shown that the district court’s amount of intended loss determination was implausible in light of the record as a whole. See U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1, comment. (n.3(C)); United States v. Ismoila, 100 F.3d 380, 396 (5th Cir.1996). Accordingly, Martin’s sentence is AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.