Case ID: sw3d_451/html/0352-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Donald CARRIKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 100643
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    FILED: December 23, 2014
    Gary E. Brotherton, 503 E. Nifong Blvd., # 377, Columbia, MO 65201, for appellant.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
    Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J., and Lisa Van Amburg, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Donald Carriker (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court that denied his amended motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).