Case ID: sw3d_318/html/0312-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ted E. DAVISON, Jr., Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 93401.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Aug. 17, 2010.
    John K. Tucci, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Ted E. Davison, Jr., appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).