Case ID: misc_34/html/0830-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lucy E. Blake et al., Appellants, v. Frederick Gerken, Respondent.
    Appeal from a judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint.
    Hardy & Shellabarger (Charles o. Hardy, of counsel), for appellants.
    H. Aplington (J. A. Stitt, of counsel), for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We think the trial justice erred in his dismissal of the complaint. The undisputed evidence was that work was done and materials furnished, for which plaintiffs were entitled to at least nominal compensation. This judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with .costs to appellants to abide event of action.

Present: Eitzsimows, Oh. J., Hascall and O’Dwyer, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.