Case ID: f-appx_10/html/0076-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jeremy GERALD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 00-2332.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted March 22, 2001.
    Decided March 27, 2001.
    Jeremy Gerald, pro se.
    Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Jeremy Gerald seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e) (West Supp.2000). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Gerald’s - notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1), unless' the district court extends the appeal period under Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on July 6, 2000. Gerald’s notice of appeal was filed on October 10, 2000. Because Gerald failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.