Case ID: ny-2d_23/html/0710-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Anak Wine & Liquor Co., Inc., Appellant, v. New York State Liquor Authority et al., Respondents.
    Argued November 13, 1968;
    decided November 27, 1968.
    
      
      Robert W. Corcoran for appellant.
    
      Hyman Amsel and Joseph S. Ryan for State Liquor Authority and another, respondents.
    
      David J. Eisenberg for Murray Wine & Liquor, Inc., respondent.
   Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen. Judges Scileppi and Keating dissent and vote to reverse and to reinstate the order and judgment of Special Term upon the ground that the finding of the State Liquor Authority that the public convenience and advantage will be served by the granting of another retail liquor store license in this dilapidated, poverty stricken, disease and crime-ridden neighborhood is without support in the record.