Case ID: so2d_700/html/0416-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

INVERSIONES ARMADENI, S.A., Appellant, v. Jose TEJEDO, Jr., Appellee.
    No. 96-3149.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Sept. 24, 1997.
    Rehearing Denied Nov. 5, 1997.
    Mark A. Marder, Miami, for appellant.
    Jose M. Cervera, Miami, for appellee.
    Before COPE, GERSTEN and SHEVIN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary judgment entered in favor of the appellee. A genuine issue of material fact exists as to the date the appellant knew or should have known of the existence of the fraudulent concealment action, and thus summary judgment is precluded. See Nardone v. Reynolds, 333 So.2d 25 (Fla.1976); Brugiere v. Credit Commerciale France, 679 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Grossman v. Greenberg, 619 So.2d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 629 So.2d 133 (Fla. 1993).

Reversed.