Case ID: nys_145/html/1126-08.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HANNAN, Appellant, v. CARY, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    November 26, 1913.)
    Action by Edward J. Hannan against Thomas Cary.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Rehearing denied, 145 N. Y. Supp. 1126. . .

KRUSE, P. J., and LAMBERT, J., dissent, upon the ground that there was such an unauthorized assumption of ownership over the house in question as amounted to a conversion. A specific demand of possession by plaintiff was not necessary under the circumstances.