Case ID: ohio-st-3d_63/html/1421-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

92-389.
    State, ex rel. Gouge, v. Stuard.
   In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for an alternative writ,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that an alternative writ of mandamus be, and the same is hereby, granted, effective March 4, 1992.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that respondents show cause on or before March 24, 1992, why the writ of mandamus should not be granted.

Sweeney and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.