Case ID: f-appx_244/html/0151-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Humberto ORANTES-ARRIAGA, aka Alfredo Soto-Perez aka Jorge Pena-Estrada, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-30396.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted July 9, 2007 .
    Filed Aug. 1, 2007.
    
      Johnathan S. Haub, AUSA, USPO — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Marc Sussman, Esq., Portland, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: REINHARDT, HALL, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Carlos Humberto Orantes-Arriaga appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for resentencing under 18 U.S.C. § 3582. We remand with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Because the parties are familiar with the facts and proceedings below, we do not recite them here.

Even though Amendment 505 retroactively lowered the offense level that applied to Orantes, the sentencing range that would have applied to him — automatic life imprisonment — remained the same. Therefore, § 3582(c)(2), which creates jurisdiction where the “sentencing range” has been lowered, did not confer jurisdiction on the district court to resentence in this case. See also U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 (a) (tying resentencing to the “guideline range applicable to [the] defendant”).

Accordingly, this matter is remanded to the district court with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

VACATED and REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.