Case ID: f-appx_405/html/0925-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Linda ROLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. ST. JUDE MEDICAL INC., doing business as St. Jude Medical Cardiovascular Division, Cardiology Division, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 10-30524
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Dec. 27, 2010.
    Richard L. Fewell, Jr., Esq., James M. Wilkerson, Law Office of Richard L. Fe-well, Jr., West Monroe, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Edward F. Fox, Esq., Bassford Remele, Minneapolis, MN, David E. Verlander, III, McLeod Verlander, Monroe, LA, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Defendant-Appellant Linda Rollins appeals the district court’s judgment granting the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant-Appellee St. Jude Medical Inc. (“St. Jude Medical”), dismissing Rollins’s action with prejudice, granting St. Jude Medical’s Motion in Limine to exclude irrelevant and inadmissible evidence, denying Rollins’s Motion for Leave to File Untimely Opposition, and denying as moot St. Jude Medical’s Motion for Leave to File Reply Memoranda. We have now reviewed the record on appeal in its entirety, including the briefs of the parties and the applicable law as set forth therein and as independently determined, as a result of which we are satisfied that all rulings, orders, and the judgment of the district court should be, and hereby are, AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.