Case ID: njl_104/html/0174-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WILLIAM KATZ, APPELLANT, v. ESSEX SALES COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
    Argued May 20, 1927
    Decided October 17, 1927.
    Eor the appellant, Aaron Harder.
    
    Eor the respondent, McCarter & English.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Paricer, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Hone.