Case ID: sw2d_883/html/0579-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Timothy KENNEDY, Defendant/Appellant. Timothy KENNEDY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    Nos. 63180, 63969 and 65237.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Sept. 27, 1994.
    Matthew J. O’Connor, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of delivery of a controlled substance, § 195.-211.2, RSMo Supp.1991. He was sentenced by the court as a class X offender to a term of six years’ imprisonment. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).