Case ID: njl_75/html/0942-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THOMAS TONKS AND HARRY TONKS, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM F. MULLIN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued November 29, 1907 —
    Decided March 2, 1908.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiff in error, Biker •& Biker.
    
    For the defendants in error, Pitney, Hardin & Skinner.
    
   Pee Curiam.

An examination of the record discloses no error prejudicial to the plaintiff in error. The judgment under review should be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Eeed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Bogert, Yroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 12.

For reversal — None.