Case ID: f-appx_647/html/0195-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roderick Arnez WHITAKER, a/k/a Snoop, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-7989.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 21, 2016.
    Decided: April 26, 2016.
    Roderick Arnez Whitaker, Appellant Pro Se. Banumathi Rangarajan, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roderick Arnez Whitaker appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Whitaker’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Whitaker, No. 5:09-cr-00125-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 11, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.