Case ID: misc2d_18/html/0422-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary Reid, Respondent, v. Rudolph Harris et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    June 16, 1959.
    
      Thomas J. Flood and Asher Marcus for appellants.
    
      Aaron Greenspan for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The order should be unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and taxable disbursements, with leave to defendants to renew motion, if they be so advised, upon proper papers showing a meritorious defense and reasonable excuse for the occurrence of the default. The affidavit of merits was inadequate.

Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.

Order affirmed, etc.