Case ID: ga-app_46/html/0046-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, O. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

22306, 22363.
    Stillman et al. v. General Exchange Insurance Corporation of New York; and vice versa.
    
    Decided November 17, 1932.
    
      W. F. Wimberly, A. W. & M. V. Higdon, for plaintiffs.
    
      Smith, Hammond, Smith & Bloodworth, for defendant.
   Broyles, O. J.

1. Under the facts of this case as disclosed by the record, the court did not err in awarding a nonsuit.

2. The ease having been disposed of by a judgment of nonsuit, it would be “beside the mark” for this court to pass upon the assignment of error (in the bill of exceptions) based upon the allowance of an amendment to the defendant’s plea.

Judgment on the maim hill of exceptions affirmed; cross-hill dismissed.

Hooper, J., concurs. MacIntyre, J., not presiding.