Case ID: so2d_529/html/0763-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jack RITTER, Appellant, v. Betty RITTER, Appellee.
    No. 87-2568.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 19, 1988.
    Rehearing Denied Aug. 31, 1988.
    Pardo & Pardo and Joseph Pardo, Miami, for appellant.
    Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik and Paul A. Louis and Steven I. Weissman and Evan J. Langbein, Miami, for appellee.
    Before HUBBART, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The final judgment of dissolution is affirmed. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980). Although the parties have briefed and attempted to argue the issue of the wife’s entitlement to attorney’s fees, the final judgment expressly reserves jurisdiction to consider this issue, and we thus do not address it.