Case ID: so2d_835/html/1211-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BMAB EAST TOWER, INC., Appellant, v. TESTWELL CRAIG LABORATORIES AND CONSULTANTS, INC., et al., Appellees.
    No. 3D02-1507.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Jan. 15, 2003.
    Isicoff, Ragatz & Koenigsberg and Eric D. Isicoff, Miami, and Louis Perfetti Durante, for appellant.
    Moore & Goodman and Bruce A. Goodman (Ft.Lauderdale), for appellees.
    Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and FLETCHER, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the record, we conclude that appellant’s amended complaint against appellees is not barred by the statute of limitations because it relates back to the date of filing of the fourth-party complaint. See McKee v. Fort Lauderdale Produce Co., 503 So.2d 412 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), rev. denied, 513 So.2d 1061 (Fla.1987); Gatins v. Sebastian Inlet Tax Dist., 453 So.2d 871 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.