Case ID: ga-app_35/html/0577-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Blood wobte:, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

17387.
    Brewer v. The State.
    Criminal Lw, 16 C. J. p. 1218, n. 53 New; p. 1219, n. 67; 17 C. J. p. 177, n. 88; p. 233, n. 83.
    Decided July 13, 1926.
    Making intoxicating liquor; from Heard superior court—Judge Boop. April 12, 1926.
    
      Smith & Millicm, for plaintiff in error.
    
      W. Y. Athinson, solicitor-general, contra. -
   Blood wobte:, J.

1. No error was committed when the motion to continue was overruled.

2. Each ground of a motion for a new trial should be complete and understandable within itself; should of itself show error. Neither of the grounds of the motion based on the admission of evidence does this. There was no error in refusing a new trial on 'either of the grounds of the motion complaining of the admission of evidence.

3. There is ample evidence to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Lulce, J., concur.