Case ID: f-appx_670/html/0774-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles CLAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John DOE, Clerk of the States Attorney’s Office of St. Mary’s County, MD; John Doe, Clerk of Circuit Court of St. Mary’s County, MD, Defendants-Appellees, and Thomas V. Mike Miller, Jr., Attorney; Peter O’Neil, Defendants.
    No. 16-1585
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: November 4, 2016
    Decided: November 21, 2016
    
      Charles Clair, Appellant Pro Se. Brian E. Frosh, Attorney General, Jennifer L. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Clair appeals the district court’s orders granting the motion to dismiss his amended complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Clair v. Doe, No. 8:14-cv-00713-PWG, 2016 WL 374097 (D. Md. Apr. 29, 2016; Feb. 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED