Case ID: so2d_649/html/0275-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert BAKERMAN, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, Appellee.
    No. 93-1142.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Jan. 11, 1995.
    Rehearing Denied Feb. 22, 1995.
    Rodger J. Bakerman, for appellant.
    Richard A. Grumberg, Tallahassee, for ap-pellee.
    Before COPE, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Robert Bakerman appeals an order of the Department of Business Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering.

Assuming, without deciding, that appellant was entitled to an administrative appeal as a matter of right to the Division of Pari-Mutu-el Wagering, we find no reversible evidentia-ry error and conclude that the law was correctly applied. See Fla.Admin.Code R. 61D-1.008(16); Hyman v. State, Dep’t of Business Regulation, Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, 431 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); § 550.2415, Fla.Stat. (1993).

Affirmed.