Case ID: ny_221/html/0665-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas H. Ball, Appellant, v. Julian M. Gerard et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others.
    (Argued October 9, 1917;
    decided October 23, 1917.)
    
      Ball v. Gerard, 160 App. Div. 619, affirmed.
    Appeal from a judgment entered March 4, 1914, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in .the first judicial department, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion by defendants, respondents, for judgment in their favor upon the pleadings and directed a dismissal of the complaint. The action was for false representations alleged to have been fraudulently made by the said defendants and others in a prospectus whereby the plaintiff was- induced to enter into a subscription contract by which he bought and agreed to pay for stock of a mining company. The answer interposed a general denial and as an additional defense set up the Statute of Limitations.
    
      Frederick H. Sanborn for appellant.
    
      John M. Bowers and Latham G. Reed for respondents.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Cuddeback, Hogan, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ.