Case ID: pa_585/html/0641-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

889 A.2d 1160
    In the Matter of Craig E. PARLES.
    No. 1060 DISC. 3.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Dec. 1, 2005.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of December, 2005, Craig E. Paries having been disbarred by consent from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated June 21, 2005; the said Craig E. Paries having been directed on September 8, 2005, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Craig E. Paries is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.