Case ID: so2d_621/html/0447-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rupert EUBANK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-0157.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Jan. 27, 1993.
    On Motion for Rehearing March 24, 1993.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Douglas J. Glaid, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., FARMER, J., and OWEN, WILLIAM G, Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

We previously affirmed, per curiam, the amended judgment of December 23, 1991, as we were aware that it superseded the original, incorrect judgment from which appellant took his appeal.

By spelling out the foregoing, the parties are now also aware of the amended judgment which was part of the record on appeal.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., FARMER, J., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.