Case ID: a3d_211/html/1252-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Konrad KURACH, Petitioner v. TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Respondent
    Mark Wintersteen, Individually and on Behalf of All others Similarly Situated v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Respondent
    No. 531 EAL 2018 No. 532 EAL 2018
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    May 29, 2019
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the limitation of payment of General Contractors Overhead and Profit from actual cash value in a replacement cost policy, although violative of binding precedent, was nonetheless valid and enforceable?