Case ID: sw2d_716/html/0909-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cheryl SENSIBAUGH, Respondent, v. James Michael SENSIBAUGH, Appellant.
    No. 50470.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Sept. 23, 1986.
    Edmond H. Kinghom, Clayton, for appellant.
    Joseph A. Lott, St. Louis, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by James Michael Sensi-baugh from the decree of the trial court in a dissolution of marriage proceeding. After examining the record, we are convinced that the trial court’s decree is supported by substantial evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion on the specific points on appeal would have no prece-dential value. Rule 84.16(b).

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.