Case ID: ga-app_29/html/0494-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bell, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

13637.
    Rainey v. McFarland.
    Decided February 9, 1923.
    Complaint; from Floyd superior court—Judge Nunnally. April 6, 1922.
    
      Porter & Mebane, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Willingham, Wright & Covington, contra.
   Bell, J.

Although the plaintiff in error, who was defendant in the trial court, recites in his bill of exceptions that a verdict adverse to him was by the court directed, the sole assignment of error is upon the overruling of his motion for a new trial, which contained the general grounds only; and, since the evidence did not demand a verdict in his favor, such judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.