Case ID: f-appx_692/html/0168-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Steven Dixon PRENTICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barry EDWARDS, Unit Manager—FTC Oklahoma; HSA Grismer, Health Services Administrator—FCI El Reno; H.A. Ledezma, Warden (former)—FCI El Reno; Jason Sickler, Legal Counsel—BOP South Central Regional Office; Mr. Commacho, Unit Manager (former)—FCI Butner; Angela Dunbar, Warden (former)—Butner Medium II; Justin Andrews, Warden—Butner Medium II; Andrea Richardson, Case Manager, Defendants-Appellees, and Bureau of Prisons; Adrian Towe, Unit Team Counselor—FCI Butner, Defendants.
    No. 17-6230
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 22, 2017
    Decided: June 27, 2017
    Steven Dixon Prentice, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Ann Kelley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven Dixon Prentice appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, Prentice v. Edwards, No. 5:15-ct-03006-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 14, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED