Case ID: ny_196/html/0534-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David P. Canavan et al., Respondents, v. Decauville Auto mobile Company, Appellant.
    
      Oanamn v. Decaumlie Automobile Co., 124 App. Div. 933, affirmed.
    (Argued October 11, 3909;
    decided October 26, 1909.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 26, 1908, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying .a motion for a new trial in an action to recover upon ■ certain contracts.
    
      Francis Fitch, Frederick 8. Randall and Samuel 8. Slater for appellant.
    
      L. Lajtin Kellogg and Franklin. Kevins for respondents.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.