Case ID: ark_273/html/0456-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Larry Ellender WILSON v. STATE of Arkansas
    620 S.W. 2d 936
    Supreme Court of Arkansas
    Opinion delivered July 20, 1981
    
      Donald H. Smith, for appellant.
    
      Steve Clark, Atty. Gen., by: Alice Ann Bums, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.
   Per Curiam.

The appellant, Larry Ellender Wilson, by his attorney has filed a Motion for Rule on the Clerk. It is denied because the motion does not state good cause. While the attorney for the appellant says there was a misunderstanding between him and the court reporter, there is no acknowledgement that the sole reason the record was not filed was the negligence of the attorney. If the appellant’s attorney will concede that in an amended motion, then the appellant will be granted a belated appeal. See Moore v. State, 267 Ark. 548, 609 S.W. 2d 894 (1980).