Case ID: so2d_555/html/1241-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph A. BLAINE, Appellant, v. Martin MARMOR and Goldie Marmor, Appellees.
    No. 89-288.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 14, 1989.
    Rehearing Denied Feb. 15, 1990.
    Scott Greenfield, for appellant.
    Genet & Milner and Donald G. Criscuolo, North Miami Beach, for appellees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and COPE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

As the record shows that appellant is a stranger to the note as to which he seeks to recover allegedly usurious payments, dismissal of plaintiff’s action is affirmed. See Nesbitt v. Citicorp Savings, 514 So.2d 371 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Affirmed.