Case ID: nj-eq_88/html/0344-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Raymond R. Wortendyke, trustee, &c., complainant-appellant, v. Louis Rayot et al., defendants-respondents.
    [Decided September 13th, 1917.]
    
      Mr. Alexander J. Higgins, for the appellant.
    
      Mr. J. Emil Walscheid, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Griffin in the opinion filed in the court below, and reported in 87 N. J. Eq. 159.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Beroten, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 13.

For reversal — None.