Case ID: f2d_181/html/1012-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lela WILCOX, Appellant, v. Tighe E. WOODS, Housing Expediter, Office of the Housing Expediter, Appellee.
    No. 12316.
    United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
    May 22, 1950.
    Rehearing Denied June 27, 1950.
    Lela Wilcox, in pro. per.
    Ed Dupree, Gen. Counsel, OHE., Leon J. Libeu, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Francis X. Riley, Sp. Lit. Atty., Washington, D. C., for appellee.-
    Before BIGGS, BONE, and POPE, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

A careful consideration of the briefs, the record and the qral argument convinces ,us that the learned trial judge committed no error in this proceeding which would require a reversal of the judgment below. No new point of law is presented which should be discussed here. See Porter v. Warner Holding Co., 328 U.S. 395, 66 S.Ct. 1086, 90 L.Ed. 1332; Woods v. Richman, 9 Cir., 174 F.2d 614, and Brooks v. Woods, 9 Cir., 181 F.2d 716. The judgment is affirmed.