Case ID: nys_135/html/1145-14.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

TANNATT, Respondent, v. HAINES, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    May 1, 1912.)
    Action by Thomas B. Tannatt against Samuel Haines.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that reversible error was committed upon the trial by receiving in evidence, first, the alleged newspaper interview with defendant; second, the subsequent transaction between the parties as to the fourth car of apples; third, the proof in relation to the alleged statute law of the state of Washington relating to commission merchants.

McLENNAN, P. j., dissents.