Case ID: f-appx_653/html/0213-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sharon DYE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; Wells Fargo, N.A., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 16-1236
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.'
    Submitted: June 23, 2016
    Decided: June 28, 2016
    Sharon Dye, Appellant Pro Se. John T. Benjamin, Jr., Law Office of John T. Benjamin, Jr., PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sharon Dye appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action challenging the validity of a note underlying a state foreclosure proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dye v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, No. 3:15-cv-00082-RJC, 2016 WL 427940 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED