Case ID: f-appx_320/html/0184-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Howard HUDSON, a/k/a Nort, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-6624.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 10, 2009.
    Decided: April 7, 2009.
    Michael T. Clifford, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. J. Patrick Rowan, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Mul-laney, John W. Van Lonkhuyzen, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Howard Hudson timely appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and motion to supplement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Hudson, No. 2:99-cr-00048-1 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.