Case ID: ny-2d_55/html/0798-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James F. O’Rorke, Jr., et al., Respondents, v Edmund S. Carpenter, Appellant.
    Decided December 22, 1981
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      William M. Pinzler for appellant.
    
      Stanley A. Teitler for respondents.
   OPINION of the court

On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the affirmative. Plaintiffs may defeat defendant’s claim of qualified privilege by demonstrating that the alleged defamatory statements were known to be false at the time of publication. As plaintiffs have sufficiently raised a triable issue in this regard, defendant’s motion for summary judgment was properly denied.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.