Case ID: cal_4/html/0286-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Ch. J. Murray", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MARY E. GATES v. CHARLES E. BUCKINGHAM.
    
      Appeal, Aefirmanoe oe Judgment. — The notices and affidavits filed on an application to re-tax costs, were not embodied in a bill of exceptions or statement. Beld, that the judgment must be affirmed, upon the presumption that the Court below decided properly upon all the evidence before' it.
    Appeal from the Fourth Judicial District.
    
      
       Cited in Butter v. Mason, 11 Cal. 214; Moore v. Semvie. Id. ÍÍG1.
    
   Mr. Ch. J. Murray

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. J. Heydeneeldt concurred.

This appeal is presented from an order of the Court below re-taxing costs.

The record contains various notices and affidavits, which are not, however, embodied in a bill of exceptions or statement, so that we are uninformed upon what the Court acted. The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed, on the presumption that the Court below decided correctly upon all the evidence before it.