Case ID: nj-misc_8/html/0001-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PETER PETERSON, PLAINTIFF, v. REBECCA KRINICK AND HARRY KRINICK, DEFENDANTS.
    Submitted May term, 1929
    Decided December 21, 1929.
    Before Justices Trenchard, Lloyd and Case.
    Bor the plaintiff, Goult, Satz & Tomlinson.
    
    Bor the defendants, Turner & Stalter.
    
   Per Curiam.

This is an application for rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted on the ground that the verdict was excessive. An examination of the proofs and the arguments leads ns to the conclusion that a rule to show cause should issue. Let it issue accordingly.