Case ID: nys_80/html/1149-10.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HATCH, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SUTHERLAND v. MEAD et al.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    February 13, 1903.)
    Action by George R. Sutherland against Charles H. Mead and Thomas Taft, impleaded. From an order denying a motion to open a default, defendants Mead and Taft appeal. Affirmed. A. H. F. Seeger, for appellants. Edward Hassett, for respondent.
   HATCH, J.

This case is disposed of by the opinion in Sutherland v. Mead et al. (handed down herewith) 80 N. Y. Supp. 504. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.