Case ID: minn_41/html/0493-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      By the Cov,rt.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George E. Warner vs. Charles M. Foote and Wife.
    October 18, 1889.
    Evidence considered, and held sufficient to sustain the finding and decision of the trial court.
    Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, where the action was tried by Kochren, J.
    
      Benton, Plumley & Healy, for appellants.
    
      Keith, Evans, Thompson & Fairchild, and A. Humphreys, for respondent.
   By the Cov,rt.

After the decision upon the former appeal, (40 Minn. 176, 41 N. W. Rep. 935,) the trial court, upon defendant’s application, made additional findings upon the evidence received under his counterclaim, whereby he claims to be entitled to be allowed in this action for the value of certain articles of personal property used or retained by the plaintiff. Upon the counterclaim, however, the court finds adversely to the defendant. We are of the opinion that the record presents sufficient evidence to support the finding of the trial court upon that matter, and as there is no other question upon this appeal the judgment must be affirmed.