Case ID: f-appx_708/html/0634-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyler Dwayne WADDLE, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 17-12022 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    (January 9, 2018)
    Peter J. Sholl, U.S. Attorney Service— Middle District of Florida, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    
      Nicole Valdes Hardin, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tampa, FL, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant
    Tyler Dwayne Waddle, Pro Se
    Before WILSON, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Robert Godfrey, appointed counsel for Tyler Waddle in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Waddle’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.