Case ID: ohio-st-3d_60/html/0037-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cincinnati Bar Association v. Sack.
    [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Sack (1991), 60 Ohio St. 3d 37.]
    (No. 90-2537 —
    Submitted February 13, 1991 —
    Decided May 29, 1991.)
    
      
      D. Michael Poast and R. Guy Taft, for relator.
    
      Robert H. Sack, pro se.
    
   Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s findings of fact and adopt its recommendation of a one-year suspension. We order, however, that six months of respondent’s suspension be stayed pending the successful completion of a six-month probation period. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.