Case ID: us_292/html/0603-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 919.
    Lutz v. Houck et al.
    Motion submitted April 14, 1934.
    Decided April 30, 1934.
    
      Mr. George Clinton, Jr., for appellant. Mr. Henry Epstein for appellees.
   Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Hayes v. Missouri, 120 U.S. 68, 71, 72; Budd v. New York, 143 U.S. 517, 548; Toyota v. Hawaii, 226 U.S. 184, 191, 192; Packard v. Banton, 264 U.S. 140, 143, 144; Radice v. New York, 264 U.S. 292, 296; Miller v. Wilson, 236 U.S. 373, 384; Price v. Illinois, 238 U.S. 446, 453; Silver v. Silver, 280 U.S. 117, 123, 124; Sproles v. Binford, 286 U.S. 374, 396.