Case ID: ny-2d_73/html/0945-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dean Simonds, Appellant.
    Argued February 16, 1989;
    decided March 23, 1989
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Howard Friedman and Philip L. Weinstein for appellant.
    
      Paul T. Gentile, District Attorney (Allen M. Hecht and Susan L. Valle of counsel), for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed. Defendant’s argument with respect to an alleged Rosario (People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286) violation, never having been raised in the trial court or the Appellate Division, is unpreserved for our review (People v Poole, 48 NY2d 144, 149-150), and his other arguments are without merit.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.