Case ID: nj-eq_72/html/0435-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard Siegman, complainant-respondent, v. Electric Vehicle Company et al., defendants-appellants.
    [Argued November 26th, 1906.
    Decided March 26th, 1907.]
    On appeal from an order of the chancellor, advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.
    
      Mr. Richard V. Lindabury, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. James B. Howell, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

This canse was argued together with Siegman v. Electric Vehicle Co. and Kissell, decided by this court at the present term, upon an opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Pitney, ante p. 403. The same question being presented in each of the two cases, the order under review herein will be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons given in that opinion.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Garrison, Port, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Trenci-iard, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill—15.

For reversal—None.