Case ID: ad_246/html/0568-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of the Application of Rudolph Inderbitzen, Respondent, for a Mandamus Order against City of Buffalo and Others, Appellants.
   Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Matter of Schmidt v. Board of Supervisors, 244 App. Div. 493, and Holton v. Board of Supervisors, 245 id. 144.) All concur. (The alternative mandamus order directs petitioner’s reinstatement.) Present — Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.