Case ID: sw3d_363/html/0134-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Randall KUTA, Appellant, v. Sherry KAMINSKY, et al., Respondents.
    No. ED 96724.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Jan. 17, 2012.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 23, 2012.
    Application for Transfer Denied May 1, 2012.
    Kenneth J. Heinz, Clayton, MO, for Appellant.
    James D. Maschoff, Brian M. Wacker, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
    Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Randall Kuta, doing business as Life-tyme Exteriors, (“Plaintiff’) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, directing a verdict in favor of defendants Sheri Kamin-sky, Oscar Hantz, and Don Anderson, doing business as Anderson Building Co., and against Plaintiff on Plaintiffs Petition for Damages. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).