Case ID: ad2d_278/html/0102-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Raymond J. Duffy, Plaintiff, v Chemical Bank et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
    [717 NYS2d 532]
   Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), entered on or about October 12, 1999, which, upon reargument, granted the previously denied motion of third-party defendant Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. to dismiss the third-party complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In view of the service agreement between defendant and third-party plaintiff building owners and third-party defendant management company requiring third-party plaintiffs to purchase insurance and indemnify third-party defendant with respect to claims such as those asserted by plaintiff in the main action, the third-party action was properly dismissed (see, Santamaria v 1125 Park Ave. Corp., 238 AD2d 259). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Tom, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.