Case ID: nys_82/html/1104-14.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

KRACHT, Appellant, v. BROSMAN, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    May 19, 1903.)
    Action by John Kracht against Henry Brosman.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the referee was justified in finding that the evidence in this case did not satisfactorily establish the appellant’s claim, within the well-settled rule relative to claims against the estates of deceased persons. O’Neill v. Barry, 20 App. Div. 121, 46 N. Y. Supp. 752; Van Slooten v. Wheeler, 140 N. Y. 624, 35 N. E. 583.