Case ID: ad_172/html/0945-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rose Sobel, Respondent, v. Sarah Philip Sobel, Individually and as Executrix and Trustee, etc., and Frederick Sobel, Appellants, Impleaded with Others, Appellants.
    Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 14th day of January, 1916, denying a motion to vacate an order for the examination of defendants.
   Per Curiam:

The order appealed from should be modified by striking therefrom, after the words “the financial condition of the defendant Frederick Sobel,” the following: “and of the differences between the plaintiff and the defendant Frederick Sobel prior to such assignment; ” and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Page, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.