Case ID: f-appx_310/html/0946-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John HAGENAAR; Shirley Hagenaar, Appellants, v. ANDREW COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; Gary Howard; Robert Elam; City of Savannah; Janet Hatcher; Ron Holliday, Appellees.
    No. 07-3868.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 2, 2009.
    Filed: Feb. 23, 2009.
    John Hagenaar, Savannah, MO, pro se. David S. Baker, Peter Maharry, Fisher, Patterson, Sayler & Smith, L.L.P., Overland Park, KS, for appellees Howard, Elam, and Andrew County Sheriffs Dept.
    Bradley C. Nielsen, Jason B. Moore, Franke, Schultz & Mullen, P.C., Kansas City, MO, for appellees City of Savannah, Hatcher, and Holliday.
    Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

John and Shirley Hagenaar appeal the district court’s dismissal of their complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Following careful de novo review, we conclude dismissal was proper because the Hagenaars failed to state a claim for relief against any named defendant. See LeMay v. U.S. Postal Serv., 450 F.3d 797, 799 (8th Cir.2006) (standard of review); Phipps v. FDIC, 417 F.3d 1006, 1010 (8th Cir.2005) (this court may affirm for any reason supported by record).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.