Case ID: sc_71/html/0016-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Jones.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HARRINGTON v. GIDEON.
    Ruled by the preceding case of Wieters v. May.
    
    Before Watts, J., Richland,
    July, 1904.
    Reversed.
    Action by London Harrington against M. B. Gideon, L. H. Wilson and M. C. Poole. From Circuit order granting motion to strike out certain allegations in the complaint, plaintiff appeals.
    
      
      Messrs. Thomas & Gibbes, for appellant.
    
      Messrs. Bellinger} Tozwisend & Haskell, contra.
    March 6, 1905.
   The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

This is an appeal from an order of Judge Watts granting a motion to strike out certain allegations of the complaint. The question presented and the facts of the case are exactly the same as in the case of Rudolph H. Weiters v. J. A. May et al., recently decided by this Court. For the reasons stated in that case, the order appealed from in this case should be reversed, in so far as it granted the motion to strike out, but in so far as the said order granted an extension of time to defendant in which to plead, answer or demur, it should be affirmed:

The judgment of the Circuit Court is, therefore, reversed, in so far as it granted the motion to strike out.