Case ID: cust-ct_37/html/0416-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Wilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 60354.
    protests 181015-K, etc. (New York).
    Bernstein & Skolnick, Inc., and Leading Forwarders, Inc., et al. v. United States,
   Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that the items marked “A,” “B,” “C,” and “D” are neither appropriate nor suitable for the purpose of ornamentation to which artificial flowers may be temporarily devoted and that the merchandise consists of articles the same in all material respects, except for the component material of chief value, as those the subject of Abstract 57673. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited authority, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked “A” at 20 percent under the provision in paragraph 1023, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), for articles, composed wholly or in chief value of vegetable fiber, other than cotton; (2) the items marked “B” at 45 percent under the provision in paragraph 1529 (a), as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), for articles, composed wholly or in chief value of yarns, threads, or filaments; (3) the items marked “C” at 12]4 percent under the provision in paragraph 1537 (a), as modified by T. D. 51802, for articles, composed wholly or in chief value of palm leaf, other than raffia; and (4) the items marked “D” at 25 percent under paragraph 1537 (a) as articles, composed wholly or in chief value of straw.