Case ID: so2d_82/html/0746-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Florida, Plaintiff, v. Kermit G. TINDELL, Defendant.
    Supreme Court of Florida. Division B.
    Oct. 12, 1955.
    George A. Brautigam, Miami, for plaintiff.
    Carr & O’Quin, Miami, for defendant.
   PER CURIAM.

The court declines to answer the question certified to us under 30 F.S.A. Supreme Court Rule 27 because an answer would involve the jurisdiction of the circuit court and the rule specifically provides that “The certificate shall not be employed in such a way as to affect the jurisdiction of * * * the circuit court * * * »

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, HOBSON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.