Case ID: ohio-st-3d_90/html/0522-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Alice Robie Resnick, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State ex rel. Light, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.
    [Cite as State ex rel. Light v. Indus. Comm. (2001), 90 Ohio St.3d 522.]
    (No. 00-677
    Submitted November 14, 2000
    Decided January 10, 2001.)
    
      Butkovich, Schimpf, Schimpf & Ginocchio Co., L.P.A., and James A. Whittaker, for appellant.
    
      Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Thomas L. Reitz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
   The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent.

Alice Robie Resnick, J.,

dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and return the cause to the Industrial Commission for relief consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666.

Douglas, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.