Case ID: nj_51/html/0005-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cubiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WINDSOR CONTRACTING CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, CROSS-APPELLANT, v. VINCENT BUDNY AND BUDNY’S TIRE SERVICE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS.
    Argued December 18,1967
    Decided December 22,1967.
    
      Mr. Edward B. Meredith for appellants (Messrs. Meredith & Meredith, attorneys).
    
      Mr. Anton J. Hollendonner for respondent.
   Pee Cubiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Kilkenny in the Appellate Division, 93 N. J. Super. 235. Mr. Justice Proctor votes to reverse for the reasons given by Judge Goldmann in his dissenting opinion.

For affirmance—Chief Justice Wbintbaub and Justices Jacobs, Ebancis, Schettino and Haneman—5.

For reversal—Justice Pboctoe—1.