Case ID: f-appx_436/html/0914-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert EUSEBIO-BERROA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 10-15211
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Aug. 3, 2011.
    Kathleen M. Salyer, Anne R. Schultz, Wifredo A. Ferrer, U.S. Attorney, William C. Healy, Kelly S. Karase, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Frank Schwartz, Frank Schwartz, P.A., Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Robert Eusebio-Berroa, Miami, FL, pro se.
    Before EDMONDSON, WILSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Frank Schwartz, appointed counsel for Robert Eusebio-Berroa, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Eusebio-Berroa’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.