Case ID: ny_181/html/0543-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Grove D. Curtis et al., Respondents, v. Natalie Anthracite Coal Company, Appellant.
    
      Curtis v. Natalie Anthracite Coal Co., 89 App. Div. 61, affirmed.
    (Argued March 17, 1905;
    decided April 11, 1905.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 11, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
    
      Martin Conboy, Arthur J. Baldwin and Leonard D. Baldwin for appellant.
    
      George O. Austin for respondents.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs, on prevailing opinion below.

Concur: O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ. Dissenting: Cullen, Oh. J. Absent: Gray, J.