Case ID: njl_102/html/0720-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WILLIAM DOUGLAS MOORE, EXECUTOR, ETC., APPELLANT, v. NEWTON A. K. BUGBEE, STATE COMPTROLLER, RESPONDENT
    Submitted October 29, 1925
    Decided December 2, 1926.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N. J. Mis. R. 435.
    For the appellant, Andrew Foulds, Jr.
    
    For the respondent, Edward L. Katzenbach, attorney-general.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the court below.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Katzenbach, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.