Case ID: pa_432/html/0620-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Antanitis v. Hecht, Appellant.
    Argued October 10, 1968.
    Before Bell, C. J., Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.
    
      
      Francis S. Patrono, with him Robert D. Beck, and Patrono, Geisler and Edwards, for appellant.
    
      ¡Stephen I. Richman, with him Greenlee, Richma'ii, Derrico & Posa, for appellee.
    November 12, 1968:
   Opinion

Pee Curiam,

This is an appeal by defendant after a jury verdict for plaintiffs in claims arising from an automobile collision. The evidence as to negligence was conflicting, the verdicts were not excessive, and there was no error of law or abuse of discretion in the lower Court’s refusal to grant a new trial or a judgment n.o.v.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice Musmanno did not participate in the decision of this case.