Case ID: f-appx_332/html/0043-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Abdel Musen FATTAH, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-2116.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 15, 2009.
    Decided: Sept. 4, 2009.
    Sandra Lynn Greene, York, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. Barbara Murder Bow-ens, Kevin Frank McDonald, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
   Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Abdel Musen Fattah appeals a district court order denying his motion to compel the Government to comply with a consent order. During the district court proceedings, Fattah was held at the Columbia Care Center under the authority of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Division (“ICE”) of the Department of Homeland Security. The consent order in this case concerned Fattah’s medical and psychological care while at the Columbia Care Center. Fattah has since been transferred back to state custody and is presently incarcerated at the Pennsylvania State Correctional Institution at Rockview.

Because Fattah has sued only for injunctive relief, and because he is no longer under ICE’s supervision, this appeal is moot. See Rendelman v. Rouse, 569 F.3d 182, 184 (4th Cir.2009); Doe v. Kidd, 501 F.3d 348, 354 (4th Cir.2007), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 128 S.Ct. 1483, 170 L.Ed.2d 297 (2008); Mellen v. Bunting, 327 F.3d 355 (4th Cir.2003). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We also deny as moot Fattah’s pending pro se motions, including the motion to stay, the supplemental motion to stay and the pro se motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.