Case ID: sw_163/html/0080-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DAVIDSON, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

AUSTIN v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Jan. 28, 1914.)
    Criminal Law (§ 1090) — Appeal — Statement of Pacts — Bills of Exception.
    Where there is no statement of facts or bills of exception, the grounds of a motion for new trial cannot be reviewed.
    [Ed. Note. — Por other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. «§ 2653, 2789, 2S03-2822, 2825-2827, 2927, 2928, '2948, 3204; Dec. Dig. § 1090.]
    Appeal from District Court, Ft. Bend County; Samuel J. Styles, Judge.
    Blake Austin, Jr., was convicted of theft from the person, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    
      
      For other oases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig.. Key-No. Series & Rep’r Indexes
    
   DAVIDSON, J.

Appellant, was convicted of theft from the person, his punishment being assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. In this condition of the record, the grounds of the motion for a new trial are not reviewable.

The judgment will be affirmed.