Case ID: so2d_240/html/0528-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jeanette PECKER, Appellant, v. Samuel PECKER, Appellee.
    No. 70-346.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 3, 1970.
    Herman Grayson ánd John E. Porte, Miami Beach, for appellant.
    Betty Kessler, Miami, for appellee.'
    Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a final judgment granting the appellee a divorce and denying her claim for alimony.

The sole question presented is whether the court er.red in taking jurisdiction of the parties-and subject matter. It is appellant’s contention that the appellee did not prove that he had become a bona fide resident of the state of Florida for six months last past prior to filing his complaint for divorce.

It is a well established rule of law that the trial judge’s findings of fact and conclusions of law come to the appellate court with a presumption of correctness and will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. No reversible error having been made to appear the judgment appealed must be affirmed.

Affirmed.