Case ID: nys_107/html/1135-08.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LUSK, Respondent, v. LEE et ah, Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    November 27, 1907.)
    Action by Fred Lusk against Fred Lee and another.
   PER CURIAM.

Orders affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Held that under the circumstances of this case it cannot be said that the court abused its discretion in denying the motions.

SPRING and ROBSON, JJ., dissent.