Case ID: f-appx_696/html/0824-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN RE: Adina ZAHARESCU, Debtor. Satish Shetty, Appellant, v. Ocwen Financial Services, Inc.; et al., Appellees.
    No. 14-55401
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted August 9, 2017 
    
    Filed August 24, 2017
    Satish Shetty, Pro Se
    Eric D. Houser, Attorney, Robert W. Norman, Jr., Attorney, Houser & Allison, APC, Irvine, CA, for Appellees Ocwen Financial Services, Inc., Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Litton Loan Servicing, LP
    Eric D. Houser, Attorney, Robert W. Norman, Jr., Attorney, Houser & Allison, APC, Irvine, CA, Kevin Broersma, Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Appellee Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
    Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Satish Shetty appeals pro se from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing- claims against appellees in Shetty’s adversary proceeding. We review de novo our own jurisdiction and whether a bankruptcy court’s decision is final. Silver Sage Partners, Ltd. v. City of Desert Hot Springs (In re City of Desert Hot Springs), 339 F.3d 782, 787 (9th Cir. 2003). We dismiss.

This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because “the bankruptcy court’s order did not dispose of all of the issues in the adversary proceeding” or “direct entry of judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) which applies to adversary proceedings in bankruptcy by virtue of Bankruptcy Rule 7054.” Walther v. King City Transit Mix, Inc. (In re King City Transit Mix, Inc.), 738 F.2d 1065, 1066-67 (9th Cir. 1984) .(appellate jurisdiction in bankruptcy extends only to matters appealable to the district court as of right).

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.