Case ID: so2d_810/html/0524-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. GRIFFIN, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROBERT FAMILY, et al., Petitioners, v. CITY OF ORLANDO, Florida, et al., Respondent.
    No. 5D01-3474.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Jan. 11, 2002.
    Rehearing Denied March 13, 2002.
    Mark V. Morsch of Mark V. Morsch & Associates, P.A., Winter Park, for Petitioners.
    No Appearance for Respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

SHARP, W., and PALMER, JJ., concur.

GRIFFIN, J., dissents with opinion.

GRIFFIN, J.,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent.

In my view, Doe v. Young, 656 So.2d 569 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) is not controlling in this case. In any event, I think Doe was wrongly decided.