Case ID: nev_92/html/0017-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NUTRITIONAL ADDITIVES CORPORATION, A Nevada corporation, and W. GLENN SEXTON, Appellants, v. MIN-AD, INC., a Colorado corporation, Respondent.
    No. 8451
    January 6, 1976
    544 P.2d 437
    
      Stanley H. Brown and Harold G. Albright, Reno, for Appellants.
    
      Roland W. Belanger, Lovelock, for Respondent.
   OPINION

Per Curiam:

The district court having on June 18, 1975, entered a preliminary injunction without requiring a bond, as contemplated by NRCP 65; and

The respondent having conceded that the district court’s action was, therefore, erroneous, cf. State ex rel. Friedman v. Dist. Ct., 81 Nev. 131, 399 P.2d 632 (1965);

It is hereby ordered that the district court order granting the preliminary injunction is reversed.

Remittitur shall issue forthwith.