Case ID: f-appx_651/html/0968-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Edward ROWLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 15-12965
    Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Date Filed: 06/07/2016
    Adam W. Overstreet, Gregory A. Bor-denkircher, Kenyen Ray Brown, Sinan Ka-layoglu, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Mark Edward Rowley, Montgomery, AL, Pro Se.
    Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

William Hughes, appointed counsel for Mark Rowley in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Rowley’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.