Case ID: so2d_561/html/0467-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Francis Harold ANKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 87-02972.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    May 23, 1990.
    
      James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Jennifer Y. Fogle, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Francis Harold Anker, was convicted of burglary of a structure and petit theft. He raises two points on appeal. We find merit only in the second issue.

The trial court found appellant unable to pay and orally directed that no costs be assessed against him. Yet, the written judgment assessed costs. This was clearly a mistake and the costs provision should be stricken.

We affirm appellant’s conviction, but direct that the costs provision be stricken.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and SCHEB and ' PARKER, JJ., concur.