Case ID: ny_184/html/0599-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The City of New York, Respondent, v. Artemas H. Holmes, Appellant.
    
      City of New York v. Holmes, 104 App. Div. 630, affirmed.
    (Submitted March 22, 1906;
    decided April 6, 1906.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division 'of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 1, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury and an order denying a motion for a new trial.'
    
      Artemas If. Holmes for appellant.
    
      John J. Delany, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly and Royal H T. Riggs of counsel), for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.