Case ID: nj_50/html/0426-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MARGARET FOLEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM W. ULRICH AND LOIS ULRICH, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
    Argued November 21, 1967 —
    Decided December 4, 1967.
    
      
      Mr. Samuel A. Gennet for appellants (Mr. Aram B. Schefrin on the brief).
    
      Mr. Myron W. Kronisch for respondent (Messrs. Roskein, Kronisch & Felzenberg, attorneys).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Kolovsky in the Appellate Division.

For reversal — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Francis, Proctor, Goldmann, Schettino and Haneman —6.

For affirmance — None.