Case ID: njl_86/html/0690-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HATTIE KLOTZ, RESPONDENT, v. NEWARK PAVING COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Submitted July 3, 1914
    Decided October 16, 1914.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 85 N. J. L. 432.
    Por the respondent, John Y. Laddey.
    
    Por the appellant, McCarter & English.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chieb Justice, Garrison, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Terhune, "Williams, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.