Case ID: pa_324/html/0516-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Siemientkoskie v. Graboskie et ux., Appellants.
    Argued December 1, 1936.
    Before Kephart, C. J., Schapiter, Maxey, Drew, Linn, Stern and Barnes, JJ.
    
      W. Irvine Wiest, for appellants.
    
      J. A. Welsh, for appellee.
    December 16, 1936:
   Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from a decree directing a conveyance of real estate to appellee, the person who had paid the purchase price, the deed having been made to appellants. The court below found as a fact that at the time the consideration was paid and the property conveyed to appellants, the appellee “did not comprehend the nature of his act nor did he understand the transaction.” This finding, supported by evidence, will not he interfered with by this Court.

We have examined the other assignments of error and they are without merit. Indeed the equities of the case are all with the appellee.

Decree affirmed at cost of appellants.