Case ID: ga-app_28/html/0227-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

13157.
    Tinch v. The State.
    Decided February 14, 1922.
    Accusation of sale of incumbered property; from city of Dawson ■ — Judge Edwards. December 1, 1921.
    
      R. R. Marlin, for plaintiff in error.
    W. H. Gurr, solicitor, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial is based upon the general grounds only; there is evidence to support the verdict; no error of law appears, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.