Case ID: f-appx_104/html/0347-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph E. MACON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Charles R. BEDDINGFIELD, their official capacities as police officers for the City of Williamston, County of Anderson; D.B. Brooks, their official capacities as police officers for the City of Williamston, County of Anderson; David J. Rogers, official capacity as dogcatcher for the City of Williamston, County of Anderson, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 04-1778.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 12, 2004.
    Decided Aug. 17, 2004.
    Joseph E. Macon, Appellant pro se. Andrew Frederick Lindemann, Davidson, Morrison & Lindemann, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Joseph E. Macon appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Macon v. Beddingfield, No. CA-02-3734-8-26-BI (D.S.C. filed June 7, 2004 & entered June 8, 2004). We deny appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED