Case ID: f-appx_88/html/0993-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Augustus Morris JOHNLEY, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 03-30280.
    D.C. No. CR-00-02001-EFS.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 4, 2004.
    
    Decided March 8, 2004.
    
      Robert A. Ellis, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Christina L. Hunt, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before O’SCANNLAIN, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

The district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of another act of child molestation at Johnley’s trial. United States v. Danielson, 325 F.3d 1054, 1075-76 (9th Cir.2003); see also United States v. LeMay, 260 F.3d 1018, 1027-28 (9th Cir.2001). To the contrary, the district court conscientiously applied the LeMay factors in appraising its earlier evidentiary determination, and quite reasonably concluded that they weighed in favor of admission. Because there was no error in the admission of this evidence, the judgment of the district court is hereby

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.