Case ID: f-appx_56/html/0154-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony MCCLAIN, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-7436.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 4, 2003.
    Decided Feb. 20, 2003.
    Anthony McClain, Appellant Pro Se. Maxwell Barnes Cauthen, III, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Anthony McClain appeals the order of the district court granting summary judgment to the Government on his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). McClain moved under § 3582, alleging that Amendment 599 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines mandates a reduction of his sentence. See USSG App. C, amend. 599 (2000) (amending USSG § 2K2.4, comment. (n.2)). The district court’s legal interpretation of Amendment 599 is reviewed de novo. See United States v. Turner, 59 F.3d 481, 484 (4th Cir.1995). We have reviewed the record and conclude that Amendment 599 does not apply to McClain’s sentence and that he is not entitled to relief under § 3582. We therefore affirm the order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.