Case ID: so3d_182/html/0022-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "CLARK, J., CRICHTON, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cristen HEMSTAD v. Francis DAKIN and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, M. Christakis Co., L.L.C.
    No. 2015-CC-1211.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    Sept. 25, 2015.
   In re M. Christakis Co., L.L.C.; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 717-114 C/W 715-260; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 15-C-267.

| denied.

WEIMER, J., would grant.

GUIDRY, J., would grant.

CLARK, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.

CLARK, J.,

additionally concurring.

hi concur in the denial of the writ. Defendants have an adequate remedy-on appeal, when the appellate courts will have fully developed record to review.

CRICHTON, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.

CRICHTON, J.,

additionally concurs and assigns reasons.

[ t While I agree that there are genuine issues of material fact, in my view, this is a very close case. In the event of an adverse judgment at trial, defendants will have an adequate remedy on appeal, at which time the appellate court will have the benefit of a fully developed record.