Case ID: so2d_545/html/0064-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte Dena NEWCOMB. (Re Dena NEWCOMB v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES).
    88-753.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    May 19, 1989.
    
      Tom Payne, Montgomery, for petitioner.
    William Prendergast and Coleman Campbell, Asst. Attys. Gen., and Lynn Merrill, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The petitioner has not complied with Rule 39(k), A.R.App.P., and we find no reversible error on the facts set forth in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals. On the authority of Ex parte Save Our Streams, Inc., [1989] 541 So.2d 549 (Ala.1989), we will not issue the writ of certiora-ri, and we express no opinion regarding the merits of the petitioner’s claims.

WRIT DENIED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, ALMON, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.