Case ID: sw3d_527/html/0126-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Buddy James WICKIZER, Appellant.
    WD 79627
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    ORDER FILED: August 29, 2017
    Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.
    Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant.
    Before Division Two: Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Presiding Judge, and Karen King Mitchell and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judges
   Order

Per Curiam:

Following a jury trial, Buddy Wickizer appeals the trial court’s decision to admit certain testimony given by the victim’s grandmother, Wickizer argues the testimony was inadmissible hearsay because Grandmother was not disclosed under § 491.075 as a witness who would testify about the victim’s out-of-court statements and because Grandmother’s testimony was not admissible under the hearsay exception recognized by § 491.075, We affirm. Rule 30.25(b),