Case ID: dc_1/html/0419-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "The Court", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ellicott et al. v. G. Chapman.
    Original entries in the handwriting of a deceased clerk, must be produced. It is not sufficient to give a copy in evidence.
    Assumpsit for money lent and advanced, had and received, goods sold, &e.
   The Court

refused to admit evidence that certain original entries in the books of the plaintiff, (a copy of which entries only in the handwriting of the witness was produced on the trial,) were in the handwriting of a deceased clerk, because the original entries were not produced. The Court refused to permit an account made out in the handwriting of a deceased clerk to be given in evidence, although it was said that the original entries were in the handwriting of the same deceased clerk. The Court said the original entries must be produced.