Case ID: sarat-ch-sent_6/html/0047-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Wobd et al v Byington. (
      
      )
    
    J. R. Lawrence, for appellants;
    J. Rhoades, for respondent.
    
      
      
         Decided Aug’t 24, 1846.
    
   This case, which was an appeal from an order of a surrogate made upon an application for the sale of the real estate of infants, was noticed as a special motion, and placed upon the calendar also : and the question was raised as to the manner in which it was to be heard.

The chancellor said the application before the surrogate was a summary proceeding,, and therefore the appeal was not a proper case to be placed upon the calendar. And he directed that it should be heard as a special motion.