Case ID: njl_102/html/0726-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. HARRY KNOWLES (IMPLEADED), PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted February 12, 1926
    Decided April 8, 1926.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N. J. Mis. R. 1241.
    For the defendant in error, John O. Bigelow.
    
    For the plaintiff in error, Harry Simandl.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.