Case ID: f-appx_363/html/0222-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Earlene M. SNOWDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Claudine HEASLEWOOD; Shapiro & Burson, LLP; Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 09-1367.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 19, 2010.
    Decided: Feb. 2, 2010.
    Earlene M. Snowden, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Barry Fisher, Scott R. Robinson, FISHER LAW GROUP, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Earlene M. Snowden appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss and denying Snowden’s motion for summary judgment, application for writ of audita querela, emergency application for ex parte temporary injunction, and motion for subpoena. Snowden has also filed in this court a motion for summary judgment, seeking judgment against Defendant on the basis of fraud and theft. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order for the reasons stated by the district court. Snowden v. Heaslewood, No. 8:08-cv-00674-DKC (D.Md. March 23, 2009). We also deny Snowden’s motion for summary judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.