Case ID: f-appx_255/html/0287-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Manuel ROSAS, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 06-30357.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 13, 2007 .
    Filed Nov. 26, 2007.
    Pamela Jackson Byerly, Esq., USSP— Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Tracy A. Staab, Esq., FPDWA — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: TROTT, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Manuel Rosas appeals from the 63-month sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to being an alien in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Rosas contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) should be construed to require the defendant to admit, or the jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt, the fact that a prior removal was “subsequent to” a prior felony conviction. Because the record indicates that Rosas admitted the date of removal at the change-of-plea hearing, we reject this contention. See United States v. Bolanos-Hernandez, 492 F.3d 1140, 1148 (9th Cir.2007).

Rosas also contends that AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), is invalid. We also reject this contention. See Bolanos-Hernandez, 492 F.3d at 1148.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.