Case ID: ad2d_23/html/0727-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of J. Homer Butler, Appellant, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent.
   Judgment in an article 78 proceeding entered May 19, 1964, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The record satisfies the court that the landlord knew, or should have known, that the premises were being used primarily for residential purposes, and that the Administrator’s findings, although insufficiently articulated, purported to so find. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.