Case ID: a3d_209/html/1232-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Penny OUDHEUSDEN v. Peter OUDHEUSDEN
    Supreme Court of Connecticut.
    Decided June 26, 2019
    Scott T. Garosshen and Kenneth J. Bartschi, in support of the petition.
    Yakov Pyetranker, in opposition.
    The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 190 Conn. App. 169, 209 A.3d 1282 (2019), is granted, limited to the following issues:
    "1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had erroneously engaged in 'double dipping" by awarding the plaintiff alimony from income generated by the defendant's businesses and also awarding the plaintiff a percentage of those businesses in its division of property?
    "2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had abused its discretion by failing to enter financial orders that equitably divided the marital estate?"