Case ID: so3d_114/html/1106-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph PRESLEY, Appellant, v. Anisha WIMBISH, Appellee.
    No. 1D13-1517.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 13, 2013.
    Joseph Presley, pro se, Appellant.
    Anisha Wimbish, pro se, Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The Court has determined that this appeal is premature as it was taken from a non-final order. T.H. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 736 So.2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (holding order was non-final where order reserved jurisdiction to determine integrally-related visitation and child support issues). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek appellate review upon rendition of a final order that resolves all pending issues.

BENTON, C. J., THOMAS and CLARK, JJ., concur.