Case ID: wash_152/html/0699-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 21659.
    Department Two.
    May 27, 1929.]
    The State of Washington, Appellant, v. Pete Stromberger, Respondent.
      
    
    
      Richard B. Ott, for appellant.
    
      Miller & Freese, for respondent.
    
      
      Reported in 277 Pac. 1119.
    
   Pee Curiam.

Respondent was arrested, tried and convicted on an information filed in the superior court. Motion for a new trial was made' on the following grounds: First, errors in law occurring at the trial and excepted to by thé defendant; second, that the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence. Defendant’s motion for a new trial being granted, this appeal follows.

We have in this case the same situation as arose in the case of State v. Pavelich, 150 Wash. 411, 273 Pac. 182.

On the authority of that case, it is conceded that the judgment must be affirmed.