Case ID: f-appx_669/html/0147-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Floyd JOYNER, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, officer all in my yard, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 16-6750
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: September 29, 2016
    Decided: October 4, 2016
    Floyd Joyner, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
    Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Floyd Joyner, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and to reconsider the court’s order dismissing his action without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Joyner v. Sheriff Dep’t, No. 1:16-cv-00091-LO-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 27, 2016 & entered Apr. 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED