Case ID: f-appx_631/html/0177-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mark ROBERTS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION; Warden U.S.P. Lee, Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 15-7216.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 31, 2015.
    Decided: Jan. 28, 2016.
    Mark Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Mark Roberts, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roberts v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, No. 7:14-cv-00233-MFU-RSB, 2015 WL 3559868 (W.D.Va. June 5, 2015; June 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.