Case ID: f-appx_225/html/0120-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael F. EASLEY; M.D. Congleton; City of Wendell; Chief of Police Department; L. Houpe; John Doe, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 07-1045.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 12, 2007.
    Decided: May 3, 2007.
    
      Arthur 0. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se. Grady L. Balentine, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina; Kari Russwurm Johnson, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Arthur 0. Armstrong appeals the district court judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint as frivolous, sanctioning him $8000 and enjoining him from filing anything in the district court without first getting leave of court. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Armstrong v. Easley, No. 5:06-cv-00495-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 12, 2006). We deny Armstrong’s motion to supplement the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.