Case ID: cust-ct_59/html/0873-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Rao, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Before the Second Division,
    August 1, 1967
    No. P67/257.
    Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc. v. United States, protest 62/18542 (Boston).
   Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of battery-operated manicure sets; that said merchandise contains as an essential feature - an electrical element or device without which said articles would not operate, and does not contain an electrical heating element; and that the principles involved are the same as those in Bruce Duncan Company, a/c Sims-Worms v. United States (45 Cust. Ct. 85, C.D. 2202), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.