Case ID: ohio-st-3d_37/html/0323-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Douglas, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State, ex rel. Rose, v. Radcliffe, Judge.
    [Cite as State, ex rel. Eose, v. Eadcliffe (1988), 37 Ohio St. 3d 601.]
    No. 87-1456
    Submitted May 23, 1988
    Decided June 29, 1988.
    
      James M. Daniels and Linda I. Sutton, for intervening relator Peggy Corey.
   The motion for leave to intervene is granted.

Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., and Douglas, J., dissent.

Douglas, J.,

dissenting. I would strike the motion. The action of the majority to grant a motion to intervene is impossible to understand. Case No. 88-783, the underlying basis for this motion, has been dismissed.