Case ID: f3d_5/html/1556-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re INSURANCE ANTITRUST LITIGATION. ACE CHECK CASHING, INC.; Acme Corrugated Box Company, Inc., Anastasios Markos, t/a Municipal Exxon; Bay Harbor Park Homeowner’s Association, Inc.; Bensalem Township Authority; Big D Building Supply Corporation, et al., Private Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and State of Alabama, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY; Allstate Insurance Company; Cigna Corp.; Hartford Fire Insurance Company, et al., Defendants-Appellees. STATE OF CALIFORNIA; City of Lafayette; City and County of San Francisco; County of San Benito, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC., CNA RE (U.K.) LTD.; Continental Reinsurance Corporation; Union-America Insurance Co.; Edwards & Payne Ltd.; Excess Insurance Co., Ltd.; General Reinsurance Corp.; Thomas A. Greene & Company, Inc.; Kemper Reinsurance London; Lloyd’s Underwriters & Brokers; Mercantile & General Reinsurance Company of America; North American Reinsurance Corporation; Oxford Syndicate Mgmt. Ltd.; (sued herein as K.F. Adler & Others (U.A.) Ltd.); Prudential Reinsurance; Reinsurance Association of America; Terra Nova Insurance Co.; Aetna Casualty and Surety Company; Allstate Insurance Company; Winterthur Reinsurance Corporation of America; Cigna Corp.; Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees. STATE OF LOUISIANA, Cities of Baton Rouge, New Orleans, Slidell, Nachitoches and Eunice, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY; Allstate Insurance; Aetna Casualty and Surety Company; Cigna Corp., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    Nos. 89-16405, 89-16513 and 89-16531.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Oct. 6, 1993.
    Before BEEZER, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and SINGLETON, District Judge.
    
      
       The Honorable James K. Singleton, United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.
    
   ORDER

The judgment of the district court is reversed and the ease is remanded to it for trial in accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 2891, 125 L.Ed.2d 612 (1993).