Case ID: nj_220/html/0106-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

103 A.3d 799
    IN THE MATTER OF DALE S. ORLOVSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 000271973).
    December 12, 2014.
   ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-357, concluding that as a matter of final discipline pursuant to Rule l:20-13(c), DALE S. ORLOVSKY of TOMS RIVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1973, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since May 11, 2012, should be suspended from the practice of law for a retroactive period of two years based on his guilty plea in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey to conspiracy to defraud the United States by conspiring to conceal income from the Internal Revenue Service (18 U.S.C.A. § 371), conduct that violates RPC 8.4(b) (criminal act that reflects adversely on a lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DALE S. ORLOVSKY is suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years, effective May 11, 2012, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to Rule l:20-20(e), respondent’s failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of Rule l:20-20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent’s petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of RPC 8.1(b) and RPC 8.4(c); and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to Rule 1:10-2; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.