Case ID: tex-crim_89/html/0063-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "LATTIMORE, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

W. G. Smallwood v. The State.
    No. 6157.
    Decided March 23, 1921.
    Tick Eradication—Companion Case—Practice on Appeal.
    Where the facts involved in the instant case were substantially similar to those in a companion case, and the issues were adversely decided to appellant. they need not again be considered, and the judgment below is affirmed.
    Appeal from the County Court of Gregg. Tried below before the Honorable E. M. Bramlette.
    Appeal from a violation of the tick eradication law; penalty, a fine of $25.
    The opinion states the case.
    No brief on file for appellant.
    
      C. M. Cureton, Attorney General, and C. L. Stone, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
   LATTIMORE, Judge.

In this case appellant was convicted in the County Court of Gregg County of a violation of our law regarding tick eradication, and his punishment fixed at á fine of $25.

The facts involved in this case are substantially similar to those of Walker v. State, this day decided by this court. The tick eradication law is attacked by appellant upon the same grounds discussed and disposed of in the opinion in said Walker case. Being in accord with the views expressed therein, and finding nothing in the record in this case calling for any further discussion of either the facts or the law, we omit same.

Believing the law to be constitutional, and finding no error in the record, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

Affirmed.