Case ID: njl_97/html/0583-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. CHARLES L. LAVINE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Submitted March 27, 1922
    Decided June 19, 1922.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 96 N. J. L. 356.
    Por the defendant in error, A. Dayton OUphant, prosecutor of the pleas.
    Por the plaintiff in error, Henry 11. WUtstein and John II. Kafes.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Tbenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimbr, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Hone.