Case ID: so2d_593/html/0211-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. KOGAN,' Justice,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Phillip SALLAS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 77074.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Jan. 2, 1992.
    Louis 0. Frost, Jr., Public Defender and James T. Miller, Asst. Public Defender, Fourth Judicial Circuit, Jacksonville, for petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Kathleen E. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Sallas v. State, No. 90-1810 (Fla. 1st DCA Dec. 10, 1990) (unpublished order), which certified the same question of great public importance answered by this Court in Godwin v. State, 593 So.2d 211 (Fla.1992). The order below is quashed and this cause is remanded for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Godwin.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, MCDONALD, GRIMES and HARDING, JJ., concur.

BARKETT, J., concurs in result only.

KOGAN, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opinion, in which SHAW, C.J., and BARKETT, J., concur.

KOGAN,' Justice,

concurring in part, dissenting in part.

I concur that this opinion must be quashed and remanded. However, I would order the court below to apply the standard developed in my separate opinion in Godwin v. State, 593 So.2d 211 (Fla.1992) (Ko-gan, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part).

SHAW, C.J., and BARKETT, J., concur.