Case ID: so2d_637/html/0009-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rhonda G. HOGAN, Appellant, v. ARDC CORPORATION, f/k/a Arvida Corporation, et al., Appellees.
    No. 93-0883.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 4, 1994.
    Robert V. Williams and Kenneth G. Turk-el, Williams, Reed, Weinstein, Schifino & Mangione, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.
    James W. Beasley, Jr., Calwalader, Wick-ersham & Taft, Palm Beach, and Steven M. Katzman, Greenberg Traurig Hoffman Lipoff Rosen & Quentel, West Palm Beach, for appellees.
   ON MOTION FOB REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We deny appellant’s motion for rehearing, but amend our decision of March 9, 1994 to read as follows:

“PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Zell v. Cobb, 566 So.2d 806 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), rev. denied, 577 So.2d 1331 (Fla.1991).”

GLICKSTEIN and FARMER, JJ., and BROWN, LUCY, Associate Judge, concur.