Case ID: f-appx_84/html/0793-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Irma S. NAIG, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 02-71916.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 8, 2003.
    
    Decided Dec. 12, 2003.
    Walter Rafael Pineda, Esq., Law Offices of Walter Rafael Pineda, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.
    Regional Counsel, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, James R. Grimes, Esq., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Irma S. Naig, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance without opinion pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(a)(7) of her appeal from an Immigration Judge’s decision denying her application for suspension of deportation under INA § 244(a)(1). Naig contends that the BIA’s decision “without opinion” does not comport with due process requirements. The contention is foreclosed by this courts’ decision in Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 850-52 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. The court sua sponte changes the docket to reflect that John Ashcroft, Attorney General, is the proper respondent. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect the above caption.