Case ID: cal-app_79/html/0793-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "THE COURT.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[Civ. No. 3092.
    Third Appellate District.
    July 24, 1926.]
    C. W. THRESHER et al., etc., Appellants, v. LUCY A. RICHARDS, etc., Respondent.
    [1] School Law—High School Districts—Levy op Special Tax.— Judgment affirmed upon authority of McDonald v. Richards, ante, p. 1.
    APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County. J. 0. Moncur, Judge.
    Affirmed.
    The facts present substantially the same questions as discussed and decided in McDonald v. Richards, ante, p. 1.
    Orville C. Pratt, Jr., and George F. Jones for Appellants.
    W. E. Rothe, District Attorney, and Bond & Deirup for Respondent.
    Hill, Morgan & Bledsoe as Amici Curiae.
    
   THE COURT.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in the case of McDonald v. Richards, ante, p. 1 [248 Pac. 249], the judgment appealed from is affirmed.