Case ID: sw2d_987/html/0511-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marissa BENINCASA by Thomas HAYES, Respondent, v. Susan BENINCASA, Appellant.
    No. 74126.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    March 9, 1999.
    Charles P. Todt, Cheryl A. Zopp, Kathleen E. Shaul, The Todt Law Firm, P.C., St. Louis, for appellant.
    Susan M. Hais, Philip E. Adams, Clayton, for respondent.
    Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Susan Benincasa (mother) appeals from an order modifying judgment of paternity entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis in favor of Marissa Benincasa (child), a minor, by her next friend, Thomas Hayes (father), on father’s Second Amended Motion to Modify Judgment of Paternity and for Order of Child Custody and Support. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that no error of law appears. Because an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.