Case ID: so2d_463/html/0424-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph BILINSKI and James Jones, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 83-748.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Feb. 5, 1985.
    
      Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Samek & Besser and Lawrence Besser and Jeffrey Samek, Sp. Appointed Public Defenders, Robert Kalter, North Miami, for appellants.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Randi Klayman Lazarus, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The final judgments of conviction and sentences under review are affirmed. The trial court committed no error, as asserted, in denying the defendants’ respective motions to suppress the eyewitness identification in this case. The defendants were not unlawfully in custody when they were identified by the eyewitness at a prompt on-the-scene police show-up; nor was the show-up procedure impermissibly suggestive so as to give rise to a likelihood of irreparable misidentification. See State v. Vamedoe, 443 So.2d 201 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Cross v. State, 432 So.2d 780 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); State v. Cromartie, 419 So.2d 757 (Fla. 1st DCA), ■pet. for review dismissed, 422 So.2d 842 (Fla.1982).

Affirmed.