Case ID: f-appx_699/html/0257-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlton A. EDWARDS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 17-7098
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: October 19, 2017
    Decided: October 24, 2017
    Carlton A. Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Arthur Garnett, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carlton A. Edwards appeals the district court’s order denying relief on Edwards’ 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Edwards, No. 3:11-cr-00100-REP-RCY-1 (E.D. Va. July 25, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED