Case ID: ny_238/html/0577-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ethel Malcolm, Respondent, v. William N. Thomas, Jr., et al., Appellants.
    
      Negligence — landlord and tenant — tenant injured by fall from fire escape — when complaint improperly dismissed on ground that she had no right to go thereon.
    
    
      Malcolm v. Thomas, 207 App. Div. 230, affirmed.
    (Argued April 16, 1924;
    decided May 20, 1924.)
    Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 7, 1923, reversing a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term and granting a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendants. Plaintiff was a tenant in a tenement house owned by defendants. During all of the period of plaintiff’s tenancy the fire escape platforms were used by the various occupants, including the defendants, as a balcony on which to stand while hanging out laundry or wash to be dried. The wash lines ran from the window casements of each floor to a pole at the rear of the premises and were manipulated by pulleys. On the plaintiff’s floor the fire escape had a balcony railing extending around its three outer sides with an opening of twenty-one inches in one corner. This opening had always been protected by an iron ladder which hung on a hook suspended from the fire escape attached to the third floor. Shortly before the accident one of the defendants removed the ladder without giving notice thereof to plaintiff and without her knowledge. While using the fire escape, as customary, to hang her laundry on her pulley line, she fell through the unguarded opening to the ground and suffered injury. The complaint was dismissed upon the ground that plaintiff had no right to go on the fire escape for the purpose stated.
    
      Murray G. Jenkins and William Dike Reed for appellants.
    
      James P. Kohler for respondent.
   Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellants on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.