Case ID: f2d_179/html/0237-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Jane SORGE, Appellee.
    No. 10912.
    United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
    Dec. 14, 1949.
    John C. Shields, William R. Althans. Detroit, Mich., and Weadock & Weadock, Saginaw, Mich., Jerome Weadock, Saginaw, Mich., for appellant.
    Heilman & Purcell and Robert H. Brucker, Saginaw, Mich., John P. Purcell and Robert H. Brucker, Saginaw, Mich., for ap-pellees.
    Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and SI-MONS and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel.

And it appearing that the verdict of the jury is supported by substantial evidence, and that the court correctly applied the law in its rulings and charge to the jury;

And no reversible error being shown:

It is ordered that the judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.