Case ID: pa-super_85/html/0038-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Gawthrop, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Meyercord Company v. Gwilliam Manufacturing Company, Appellant
    (No. 2).
    February 27, 1925:
    Argued November 13,1924.
    Before Orlady, P. J., Porter, Henderson, Trexler,
    Keller, Linn and Gawthrop, JJ.
    Affirmed.
    Assumpsit on written contract. Before Brown, J.
    Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.
    The court made absolute the rule. Defendant appealed.
    
      Error assigned was the decree of the court.
    
      Harry M. Miller, for appellant.
    
      James Yearsley, and with him Illoway & Felix, for appellee.
   Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

This case was argued with the appeal of the plaintiff in The Meyercord Co. v. The Gwilliam Manufacturing Co;, to No. 200, October Term, 1924. In that case the question involved was whether it was error to refuse to enter judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. In this, in which the controlling facts do not differ from the facts in the former case, the court below entered judgment for the plaintiff for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. For the reasons stated in an opinion this day filed in the former case, the judgment is affirmed.