Case ID: f-appx_389/html/0226-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafael JAIMES-JAIMES, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 10-6672.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 22, 2010.
    Decided: Aug. 3, 2010.
    Rafael Jaimes-Jaimes, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rafael Jaimes-Jaimes appeals the district court's order denying his motion for an Extraordinary Writ. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Jaimes-Jaimes, No. 1:01-cr-00245-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adecjuately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.