Case ID: nd_73/html/0133-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[File
    No. 6903.]
    WILLIAM J. MURPHY, State Dairy Commissioner in and for the State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FAIRMONT CREAMERY COMPANY, Devils Lake, North Dakota, Defendant and Respondent.
    (12 NW(2d) 197)
    Opinion filed December 10, 1944
    
      Quentin N. Burdick, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.
    
      M. K. Higgins, for respondent, Leonard A. Flansburg and Charles H. Flansburg/and M. 8. Hartman, of Counsel.
   Per Curiam.

This case involves the action of the plaintiff as dairy commissioner in canceling a license to do business issued by him to the defendant company. The defendant appealed to the district court from the order of cancellation; and at the same time commenced an action against plaintiff asking for a writ of mandamus requiring the dairy commissioner to vacate his order of cancellation and to issue a license to do business.

In that case — Fairmont Creamery Co. v. Murphy, ante, 126, 12 NW(2d) 71, decided and filed, we hold the district court was correct in issuing tbe writ demanded. Sucb decision disposes of tbe entire situation involved in tbe case at bar.

Morris, Cb. J., and Burr, Christianson, Burke, and Nuessle, JJ., concur.