Case ID: nh_119/html/0425-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Probate Court, Cheshire County
    No. 79-033
    
      In re JEAN FISCHER WILSON ESTATE
    May 23, 1979
    
      Goodnow, Arwe, Ayer, Prigge & Gardner, of Keene (John D. Wrigley orally), for the legatees of Jean Fischer Wilson.
    
      Bradley & Talbot P.A., of Keene (Homer S. Bradley, Jr. orally), for the heirs at law.
   Memorandum Opinion

This is an appeal from a decree of the Cheshire County Probate Court (Lichman, J.) denying admission to probate of a document purporting to be the will of Jean Fischer Wilson.

Jean Fischer Wilson, at the time of her death on December 11,1977, was a resident of Fitzwilliam, New Hampshire. The document purporting to be her will was filed for probate on December 13,1977. It was attested by two witnesses and executed in the State of New Hampshire. The sole legatees under this purported will are the Smith College Alumnae Fund and two churches.

Roger H. Cole and David R. Cole, the first cousins of the decedent, are the only heirs at law and are entitled to the estate if the purported will is invalid. They seasonably objected to the allowance of the purported will on the grounds that it does not comply with the statute, RSA 551:2, which requires that a will be subscribed by three or more credible witnesses.

On June 27,1978, a hearing was held in the Cheshire County Probate Court to determine if the purported will should be admitted to probate. Following the hearing, the court ruled that the purported will could not be admitted to probate and that the estate was to be administered on an intestate basis. The exceptions of the protesting charities were reserved and transferred to this court.

The legatees under the will ask us to depart from the holding of In re Amor Estate, 99 N.H. 417, 112 A.2d 665 (1955), affirming the validity of our statutory three-witness requirement, RSA 551:2. They assert that New Hampshire is one of only four States that require three instead of two subscribing witnesses. That argument is for the legislature, which is the appropriate governmental body to amend or modify the statute as it deems appropriate.

Exceptions overruled.