Case ID: f-appx_389/html/0314-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jermaine BLACK, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-8001.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 22, 2010.
    Decided: July 29, 2010.
    Jermaine Black, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jermaine Black appeals the district court’s order denying Black’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Amendment 599 of the sentencing guidelines. We have reviewed the record and conclude that Amendment 599 does not apply to Black’s sentence and that he is therefore not entitled to relief under § 3582(c)(2). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.