Case ID: cai_2/html/0251-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

*Waddington against Chamberlain and Clason.
    The court will renew a rule for an attachment if it has not been forwarded by the clerk in time to be duly served.
   Last term tbe court bad, in this suit, granted a rule tc sbow cause why an attachment should not issue against A. B., but from some accident in the clerk’s office, in Albany, the rule had nc>t been forwarded, so as to admit of serving a copy twenty days before the term.

Biggs, on these facts, moved to renew the rule for the attachment, which was

Ordered accordingly'.