Case ID: nys_149/html/1085-11.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HALL et al. v. GARFINKEL (ROSING, Intervener).
    (No. 6325.)
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    October 30, 1914.)
    Appeal from Special Term, New York County. Action by Joseph Hall and others against Morris Garfinkel. From an order denying the motion of David Rosing to intervene, he appeals. Reversed. A. II. Townley, of New York City, for appellant. Clinton H. Blake, Jr., of New York City, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon the moving papers the intervening party shows such an interest in the property which is the subject-matter of the action as entitles him to an opportunity to prove his title thereto, and for that reason he should be made a party to the action. The order appealed from should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.