Case ID: sw3d_453/html/0347-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN the INTEREST OF: S.T. and P.T.; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. B.T. (Father), Appellant.
    WD 77700 Consolidated with WD 77701
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    ORDER FILED: January 27, 2015
    Summer A. Duke, St. Joseph, MO, for respondent.
    Lindsey C. Bachman, St. Joseph, MO, for appellant.
    Before Division One: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton, Judge and Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge
   ORDER

Per curiam:

B.T. appeals a judgment terminating his parental rights to his son, P.T., and his daughter, S.T. Because the trial court did not err in finding that clear and convincing evidence established a statutory ground for terminating B.T.’s parental rights, and did not err in finding by a preponderance of the evidence that termination of B.T.’s parental rights was in the best interests of P.T. ánd S.T., we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).