Case ID: fla_154/html/0651-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOHN O. HUZZEN v. MARY S. HUZZEN
    18 So. (2nd) 539
    June Term, 1944
    June 27, 1944
    Division B
    
      Billie B. Bush, for appellant.
    
      Edwin R. Dickenson, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM:

Appeal is from final decree denying divorce, directing the custody of a minor child and decreeing separate maintenance for the wife and minor child on bill of complaint, answer incorporating counter claim and testimony taken.

No useful purpose can be served by setting forth the evidence which is conflicting. We construe the decree as one for separate maintenance.

Appellant has failed to carry the burden of clearly showing that reversible error has occurred and as such is not apparent from the record, the decree is affirmed.

So ordered. ■

BUFORD, C. J., BROWN, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.