Case ID: f-appx_134/html/0213-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aurelio SOTO-NEVAREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-10554.
    D.C. No. CR-02-00421-MCE.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted June 14, 2005.
    
    Decided June 17, 2005.
    Kenneth J. Melikian, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Lindsay Anne Weston, Esq., Lindsay A. Weston Attorney at Law, Davis, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before KLEINFELD, TASHIMA, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Aurelio Soto-Nevarez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 97-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Soto-Nevarez has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Soto-Nevarez also filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record and pro se supplemental brief pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and, in light of the valid appeal waiver contained in the plea agreement, this appeal is DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.