Case ID: a3d_158/html/0064-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Christopher TONER, Petitioner v. The TRAVELERS HOME AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondents
    No. 170 WAL 2016
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    September 8, 2016
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the Superior Court correctly determined that an insured, who signed a UM/UIM stacking waiver at the inception of a single vehicle policy, was not entitled to stack UM/UIM benefits, even though the carrier failed to obtain stacking waivers when second and third vehicles were added to the policy?