Case ID: so2d_496/html/0190-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Francis Lansdale HERBERT, Jr., John Theodore Petersen, Jr., Thomas W. Stewart, Precision Packaging & Container, Inc., and T.W. Stewart & Associates, Inc., Appellants, v. TECNOMARK SERVICE, INC., James C. Urban and Samuel Z. Shoshan, Appellees.
    No. 86-462.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 7, 1986.
    Rehearing Denied Nov. 17, 1986.
    A.P. Walter, Jr., Coral Gables, and Martin L. Hannan, Miami, for appellants.
    Britton, Schantz & Schatzman and Geoffrey S. Aaronson, Miami, for appellees.
    Before NESBITT, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Finding no basis for affording appellants the benefit of their unperformed contract, we affirm the trial court’s order denying their motion to dissolve the temporary injunction previously affirmed in Herbert v. Tecnomark Service, Inc., 461 So.2d 950 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). See Superior Uniforms, Inc. v. Brown, 211 So.2d 50 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968).

Affirmed.