Case ID: or-app_5/html/0049-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued March 16,
    dismissed for want of jurisdiction March 16, 1971
    CITY OF SALEM, Respondent, v. ARLO WILLIAM KIMBALL, Appellant.
    
    482 P.2d 191
    
      Mike Bye, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Eleen & Dye, Salem.
    
      William G. Blair, Assistant City Attorney, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was William J. Juza, City Attorney, Salem.
    Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Langtry and Fort, Judges.
   MEMORANDUM DECISION.

This appeal involved violation of a city ordinance. Oral argument confirmed the fact that the appeal did not involve an issue as to “* * * the constitutionality of the charter provision or ordinance under which the conviction was obtained * * ORS 221.360. Therefore, in view of ORS 221.350 and 221.360, we ruled from the bench that this case be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 
      
       This matter could have been more expeditiously and less expensively handled by a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction prior to the filing of briefs.