Case ID: so2d_436/html/0951-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Milton LIFSCHITZ and Old Republic Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Filomena TROCCOLI and Emilio Troccoli, her husband, Appellees.
    No. 82-507.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 5, 1983.
    Rehearing Denied Sept. 21, 1983.
    Robert A. Glassman, Miami, for appellants.
    Keyfetz, Poses & Halpern and Jay Hal-pern, Miami, for appellees.
    Before BARKDULL, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the jury verdict and judgment entered thereon upon a holding that (1) the visibility of the danger Troccoli encountered and whether she used due care under the circumstances are issues properly left for the jury, see City of Jacksonville v. Stokes, 74 So.2d 278 (Fla.1954); Brown v. McArthur Dairies, Inc., 280 So.2d 520 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Bryant v. Florida Inland Theatres, Inc., 274 So.2d 249 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973), and (2) Lifschitz has failed to meet his burden of demonstrating prejudicial error regarding comments of the trial court, see Thompson v. Martin, 216 So.2d 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968).

Affirmed.