Case ID: cust-ct_60/html/1045-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Beckworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. P68/253.
    protests 61/12189, etc. (Philadelphia).
    No. P68/254.
    protest 62/4300 (Philadelphia).
    No. P68/255.
    protests 66/50358 and 66/13137 (New York).
    Globe Importing Company et al. v. United States, Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc. v. United States, Durst Industries, Inc., and Globe Importing Company v. United States,
   Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of strainers in chief value of brass similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies, Turner & Company v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.