Case ID: kan_72/html/0701-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

E. C. Owen v. J. H. Milhoan.
    No. 14,462.
    (83 Pac. 1044.)
    Original proceeding in quo warranto.
    
    Opinion filed November 11, 1905.
    Judgment for plaintiff.
    
      S. T. Seaton, L. G. Ferrell, E. C. Oioen, and Ogg & Scott, for plaintiff.
    
      C. Hr Potts, J. P. Hindman, I. 0. Pickering, C. B. Little, J. W. Parker, J. T. Little, C. W. Gorsuch, A. Smith Devenney, and C. L. Randall, for defendant.
   Per Curiam:

This case is in all respects similar to Ogg v. Glover, ante, p. 247, except that the office involved is that of police judge. Applying the principles announced in that case to a count of the ballots in this gives the plaintiff 598 votes and the defendant 570. Judgment is therefore rendered for the plaintiff.