Case ID: ny-super-ct_59/html/0574-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Blake & Johnson, Respondents v. Stephen R. Krom, Appellant.
    Decided January 5, 1891.
    Appeal from judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff upon a verdict directed by the trial judge, and from order denying defendant’s motion upon the minutes for a new trial.
    Herbert T. Ketcham, for appellant.
    Michael H. Cardozo, for respondents.
    Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., Freedman and Ingraham, JJ.
   The main question involved was as to the sufficiency of the evidence to substantiate a counterclaim. The Court (per Curiam) held the evidence insufficient, and affirmed the judgment and order, with costs.