Case ID: sd_58/html/0437-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HELGERSON, Respondent, v. ALLEY, et al, Appellants.
    (235 N. W. 366.)
    (File No. 7183.
    Opinion filed May 11, 1931.)
    
      Mats & Wipf, of LIuron, for Appellant.
    
      C. R. Keister, of Mitchell, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Defendant Ingle demurred to the amended complaint of the plaintiff, and from an order overruling his demurrer he has appealed. The complaint is far from a model pleading, but we are not convinced, that the learned trial judge erred in holding the same good as against demurrer. We think no useful purpose would be served by setting out the complaint or discussing the matter at further length.

The order appealed from is affirmed.