Case ID: sw2d_842/html/0575-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Edward Tate EIDSON and Kyle Logan Eidson. George EIDSON, Appellant, v. Deborah DECKER, Respondent.
    No. 61566.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Dec. 15, 1992.
    George Eidson, pro se.
    Leigh Joy Carson, Clayton, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant George Eidson appeals from a decision granting name changes to his two children. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).