Case ID: f-appx_584/html/0548-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas John LATTERELL, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-30232.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 13, 2014.
    
    Filed Aug. 18, 2014.
    Marcia Kay Hurd, Esquire, Assistant U.S., USBI-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Evangelo Arvanetes, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FDMT-Federal Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Thomas John Latterell appeals from the district court’s judgment following his guilty-plea conviction for failure to register as a sexual offender under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a). Latterell challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment. We review de novo. See United States v. Cabrera-Gutierrez, 756 F.3d 1125, 1128 (9th Cir.2014). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and remand.

By letter brief, the government concedes that Latterell’s conviction is infirm because it is predicated on interstate travel that occurred in 2006, and Latterell is a pre-Act offender who was not obligated to register under SORNA until August 1, 2008. See Reynolds v. United States, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 975, 984, 181 L.Ed.2d 935 (2012) (pre-Act offenders not required to register before the Attorney General validly specifies that the Act’s registration requirements apply to them); United States v. Valverde, 628 F.3d 1159, 1160 (9th Cir.2010) (Attorney General’s retroactivity provision became effective on August 1, 2008). Accordingly, we remand to the district court with instructions to dismiss the indictment against Latterell.

REVERSED and REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.