Case ID: f-appx_111/html/0962-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor Manuel MENDEZ, a/k/a Jose Alberto Trejo-Ruiz; et al., Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 04-10166.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 14, 2004.
    
    Decided Oct. 26, 2004.
    Mary Beth Pfister, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for PlaintiffAppellee.
    Atmore L. Baggot, Esq., Atmore Bag-got, Attorney at Law, Apache Junction, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: KLEINFELD, TASHIMA and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Victor Manuel Mendez appeals the district court’s revocation of his supervised release arising from his underlying conviction for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

As part of his plea agreement, Mendez “waivefd] any right to appeal or collaterally attack the imposition of sentence upon the defendant under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3742.” Mendez contends that his waiver did not include the knowing and voluntary waiver of his right to appeal conditions of his supervised release. His contention, however, is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Joyce, 357 F.3d 921, 923-24 (9th Cir.2004). Because Mendez validly waived his right to appeal any aspect of his sentence, including the district court’s imposition of special conditions of supervised release, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Id. at 925.

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.