Case ID: sw3d_563/html/0181-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Margaret M. IRVING, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 106375
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    FILED: December 11, 2018
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Damien Sepher Bhakti De Loyola, 920 Main Street, Ste. 500, Kansas City, MO 64105.
    ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
    Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM

Margaret M. Irving ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment" denying Movant's "Amended Rule 29.15 Motion to Vacate Judgment & Sentence," which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).