Case ID: f2d_86/html/1008-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Henry E. OPPENHEIMER, Appellant, v. The HARRIMAN NATIONAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellees.
    
    No. 350.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    Nov. 2, 1936.
    For former opinion, see 85 F.(2d) 582.
    Greenbaum, Wolff & Ernst (Edward S. Greenbaum and Newman Levy, of counsel), for appellant.
    Conboy, Hewitt, O’Brien & Boardman, of New York City (David Asch, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.
    Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      Writ of certiorari granted 57 S. Ct. 435, 81 L. Ed. —.
    
   PER CURIAM.

The order of this court will be resettled to read as follows:

“Ordered, adjudged, and decreed, that the judgment of the District Court be reversed ; and it is further

“Ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the action be dismissed as to the defendant Henry E. Cooper as conservator of the Harriman National Bank & Trust Company of the City of New York inasmuch as it appears that a receiver was appointed for said bank during the pendency of said action; and it is further

“Ordered, adjudged, and decreed that judgment for the amount demanded in the complaint be entered against the defendant the Harriman Bank & Trust Company of the Qity of New York collectible out of the assets of the receivership after payment in full of all who were creditors when the said bank became insolvent; and it is further

“Ordered, adjudged, and decreed that plaintiff have judgment for costs to be paid in due course out of the receivership estate, and it is further

“Ordered, adjudged, and decreed, that the cause be remanded and a mandate issue to said District Court in accordance with this decree.”