Case ID: sw3d_110/html/0890-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Samuel COLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 61292.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    July 29, 2003.
    Susan L. Hogan, Appellate District Defender, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before: ULRICH, P.J., and HOWARD and NEWTON, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Samuel Cole appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, Cole alleges the hearing court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion because he was denied effective assistance of counsel in that counsel induced him to plead guilty by telling him he would return to prison with an additional ten-year sentence if he did not plead guilty in exchange for probation. As a result, Cole argues his guilty plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).