Case ID: f-appx_161/html/0332-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Efrain N. CIRINEO, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Vanessa P. ADAMS, Respondent—Appellee.
    No. 05-7257.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 19, 2005.
    Decided Jan. 18, 2006.
    Efrain N. Cirineo, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Efrain N. Cirineo, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cirineo v. Adams, No. CA-05-385-2 (E.D.Va. July 19, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED 
      
       To the extent Cirineo may be seeking authorization under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) to file a second and successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion on the basis of the rules announced in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), such a motion should be filed in the circuit in which he was sentenced.