Case ID: ohio-st-3d_79/html/0030-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cincinnati Bar Association v. Rinderknecht.
    [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Rinderknecht (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 30.]
    
      (No. 96-1993
    Submitted March 4, 1997
    Decided June 18, 1997.)
    
      
      John B. Pinney and James L. O’Connell, for relator.
    
      H. Fred Hoefle, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We reject respondent’s arguments that the panel incorrectly admitted the statement of a co-conspirator and that relator did not prove the violations by clear and convincing evidence. Furthermore, we accept the findings, conclusions, and recommended sanction of the board. Accordingly, we indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law in Ohio and tax costs to him.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.