Case ID: ohio-st-2d_5/html/0189-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Grossman, Midtown Telephone Answering Service, Inc., Appellant, v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Appellee.
    [Cite as Grossman v. Pub. Util. Comm., 5 Ohio St. 2d 189.]
    (No. 39436
    Decided March 2, 1966.)
    
      
      Mr. William B. Webber and Messrs. Roemisch & Wright, for appellant.
    
      Mr. William B. Saosbe, attorney general, Mr. Theodore K. High and Mr. Clark G. Redick, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

This case presents a question of fact. The burden of proof rests upon the complainant. He has failed to produce evidence to establish his claim. The order of the Public Utilities Commission is affirmed.

Order affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.