Case ID: so2d_448/html/1254-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George M. KUBSKI and Nayda Kubski, his wife, Appellants, v. Conrad W. SCHAEFER, et al., Appellees.
    No. 83-912.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 2, 1984.
    Stephen R. Koons of McGee, Jordan, Shuey, Koons, Schroeder & Morris, Lake Worth, for appellants.
    William G. Shofstall, Jr. of Casey & McBane, West Palm Beach, and Max Rud-mann of Martin Zevin, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. We are in no position to disturb the findings of fact of the trial judge made in the face of conflicting evidence as to the existence and extent of termite infestation in appellees’ house and the related issue as to the valid cost of repair of any such damage. We also find no error by the trial court in allowing the appellee property owner to testify as to the existence and extent of termite infestation in the house.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and LETTS and BERA-NEK, JJ., concur.