Case ID: so2d_489/html/1194-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Henry MASHBURN and Margaret Mashburn, Appellants, v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellee.
    No. 85-2587.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    June 3, 1986.
    Rehearing Denied July 14, 1986.
    Baron & Budd and Jane N. Saginaw, Dallas, Tex., and Louis S. Robles, Miami, for appellants.
    Shackleford, Farrior,. Stallings & Evans and Raymond Elligett, Jr. and Charles P. Schropp, Tampa, for appellee.
    Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The summary judgment in favor of the defendants is reversed on the ground that there exists a genuine issue of fact as to when Mashburn knew or should have known of the facts giving rise to his cause of action. Copeland v. Armstrong Cork Co., 447 So.2d 922 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), affirmed in part, quashed in part, 471 So.2d 533 (Fla.1985).

Reversed.