Case ID: so2d_706/html/0952-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Porter W. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 97-751.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    March 18, 1998.
    
      Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Carl S. McGinnes, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Stephen R. White, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in appellant’s arguments challenging his conviction. Appellant’s argument that the trial court erred in not conforming the written judgment of conviction and sentence to the oral pronouncement of sentence was not properly preserved for appeal. See Davis v. State, 704 So.2d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). We, therefore, affirm.

BARFIELD, C.J., and WOLF and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur. 
      
      . We do not accept the state’s concession as to this issue since the failure to preserve this issue for appeal appears clearly on the record.