Case ID: misc2d_13/html/0350-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Adam De Donato, Doing Business as Adam Roofing & Window Co., Respondent, v. Norma Brill, Appellant.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    May 20, 1958.
    
      Joseph P. Apfel for appellant.
    No appearance for respondent.
   Per Curiam,

The court’s decision was inconsistent.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with $10 costs to the defendant to abide the event.

Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.