Case ID: ga-app_37/html/0486-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

18488.
    Dixon v. The State.
    Criminal Law, 17 C. J. p. 272, n. 43.
    Decided December 13, 1927.
    Cheating and swindling; from Laurens superior court—Judge Camp. September 17, 1937.
    
      E. L. Stephens, T. E. Hightower, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Fred Kea, solicitor-general, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

While there are some special grounds of the motion for a new trial, with subdivisions, the only thing argued by counsel for the plaintiff in error is that the verdict is not supported by the evidence. There is no general insistence on all the grounds of the motion. The jury has settled the issues of fact in favor of the State; their finding has been approved by the judge who tried the case, and this court will not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.