Case ID: f-appx_113/html/0291-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Victor CARRILLO, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Cameron LINDSAY, Warden, FCI Lompoc, Respondent—Appellee.
    No. 03-55168.
    D.C. No. CV-02-08956-MMM.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 15, 2004.
    
    Decided Nov. 22, 2004.
    Victor Carrillo, Reg. 63704-065, FCILFederal Correctional Institution, Lompoc, CA, pro se.
    Leon W. Wiedman, USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
    
      Before LEAVY, McKEOWN, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Victor Carrillo, formerly a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing, without prejudice, his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. We dismiss the action as moot.

According to the Bureau of Prisons’ Inmate Locator, Carrillo has been released from custody. “Subsistence of the suit requires, therefore, that continuing ‘collateral consequences’ ... be either proven or presumed.” Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 8, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998). The record demonstrates no such consequences resulting from Carrillo’s medical care while incarcerated. His petition is therefore moot. See Nonnette v. Small, 316 F.3d 872, 876-77 (9th Cir.2002) (a habeas petition is moot after a prisoner’s release if the petition presents no case or controversy).

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.