Case ID: or-app_229/html/0714-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

On appellant’s petition for reconsideration filed June 5,
    reconsideration allowed; former opinion (227 Or App 152, 205 P3d 84) modified and adhered to as modified July 15, 2009
    STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CHESTER LAWRENCE GUNTER, JR., Defendant-Appellant.
    
    Clackamas County Circuit Court
    CR0200095; A119373
    215 P3d 875
    Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Rebecca Duncan, Assistant Chief Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, for petition.
    Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Haselton, Judge.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Defendant requests reconsideration of this court’s decision in State v. Gunter, 227 Or App 152, 205 P3d 84 (2009). Defendant argues that, in our opinion affirming his convictions and sentences, we failed to address several arguments concerning sentencing that were made in defendant’s opening brief on appeal. Defendant requests that we consider those arguments now. We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments that the court erred in imposing sentence on defendant. A discussion of those arguments would be of no benefit to the bench, the bar, or the public. Accordingly, we modify our previous opinion to add that we reject defendant’s previously unaddressed sentencing arguments without discussion.

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.