Case ID: nj-eq_65/html/0718-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marco Bulat et al., respondents, v. Eliza Londrigan et al., appellants.
    [Filed June 19th, 1903.]
    
      Mr. Horace L. Allen, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. James B. Yredenburgh, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, delivered by him in the court of chancery, and reported in 18 Dick. Ch. Rep. 22.

For affirmance — The Ciiiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Voori-iees, Vroom — 11.

For reversal — Hendrickson—1.