Case ID: f-appx_249/html/0531-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joe TURNEY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Ana Ramirez PALMER, Warden; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 06-15140.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 24, 2007.
    
    Filed Sept. 27, 2007.
    Joe Turney, Vacaville, CA, pro se.
    Helene E. Swanson, Esq., Attorney General’s Office for the State of California, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appel-lees.
    Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Joe Turney, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials delayed his hernia surgery in violation of the Eighth Amendment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Turney did not raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether defendants acted with deliberate indifference in treating his hernia. See id. A difference in opinion between Turney and the prison physicians about the offered alternatives and the preferred course of medical treatment does not constitute an Eighth Amendment violation. See id. at 1058.

We grant Turney’s motion to file a late reply brief and instruct the Clerk to file the brief received on July 13, 2006.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.