Case ID: sw3d_386/html/0889-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Interest of B.S., a minor. Juvenile Officer of St. Charles County, Missouri, Petitioner/Respondent, v. R.H. and J.S., Respondents/Appellants.
    Nos. ED 98036, ED 98037.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Nov. 27, 2012.
    Rebeca Navarro-McKelvey, St. Charles, MO, for respondent.
    Charles Ceedrick Curd, Weldon Spring, MO, for appellant R.H.
    George E. Tillman, St. Charles, MO, for appellant J.S.
    Pamela J. Ciskowski, St. Charles, MO, Guardian Ad Litem.
    Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LISA VAN AMBURG, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated appeal, mother and father separately appeal from the judgments of the trial court terminating their parental rights to their minor child pursuant to section 211.447 RSMo (Cum.Supp. 2007). The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).