Case ID: f_122/html/1021-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

READ v. HALE.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit
    April 17, 1903.)
    No. 460.
    In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Rhode Island.
    Lewis S. Dabney and Cyrus M. Van Slyck (Charles C. Mumford, on the brief), for plaintiff in error.
    M. H. Boutelle (Robert W. Burbank and Eben Winthrop Freeman, on the brief), for defendant in error.
    Before COLT, Circuit Judge, and ALDRICH and HALE, District Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

This case is governed by the conclusion reached in Tyler v. Hale, Receiver, infra, in which a per curiam opinion was handed down this day. The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed, and the case iS remanded to that court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.