Case ID: so2d_489/html/0231-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Louis LENTO, Appellant, v. HILL YORK BROWARD, INC., The Bared & Company, and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Appellees.
    No. BI-421.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    June 10, 1986.
    Debra M. Metzler of Stiles & Allen, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.
    John W. Cash, Tampa, for appellees Hill York Broward, Inc. and U.S. Fidelity and Guar. Co.
    0. Robert Wallace, III of Robbins, Gay-nor, Burton, Hampp, Burns, Bronstein & Shasteen, P.A., Tampa, for appellees The Bared & Co. and U.S. Fidelity and Guar. Co.
   PER CURIAM.

We have thoroughly examined the briefs and the arguments and find that while reasonable minds could differ as to the resolution of the issues, there is competent substantial evidence to support the deputy commissioner’s determination. Therefore, we AFFIRM.

SMITH, JOANOS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.