Case ID: ohio-st-3d_88/html/0178-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      \n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[The State ex rel.] Taylor, Appellant, v. Leffler, Pros. Atty., et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as State ex rel. Taylor v. Leffler (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 178.]
    (No. 99-1733
    Submitted January 11, 2000
    Decided March 8, 2000.)
    
      Larry Taylor, pro se.
    
   Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its opinion. A writ of mandamus will not issue to compel an act already performed. State ex rel. Sharif v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 375, 376, 708 N.E.2d 718, 719. And appellees had no duty to create documents to meet Taylor’s requests. State ex rel. Warren v. Warner (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 432, 433, 704 N.E.2d 1228, 1229.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.