Case ID: f-appx_268/html/0487-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dorisene ANDERSON, Appellant, v. TARGET CORPORATION, Appellee.
    No. 06-3797.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 3, 2008.
    Filed: March 10, 2008.
    Dorisene Anderson, Woodbury, MN, pro se.
    Joseph G. Schmitt, Sandra L. Jezierski, Halleland & Lewis, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellee.
    
      Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
   [UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Dorisene Anderson appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment-discrimination action against her former employer, Target Corporation. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Anderson’s arguments, we find no basis for reversal. See Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002) (de novo standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
      
      . The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.