Case ID: sarat-ch-sent_5/html/0041-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the matter of the petition of Edward B. Leefe and wife.
    
    Murray Hoffman, for appellant;
    John Anthon, for res-pondenns.
    of a relative is a parly.
   Application to dismiss an appeal by the late sKs-cant register, on the ground that the chancellor had not Jurisdiction to hear it Decided that as the constitution gives an appeal to the chancellor from all inferior equity tribunals, and the legislature has made no provision for a case where She chancellor is related to one of ihe parties, authorizing any .other person to sit for him, the chancellor is bound to hear ihe appeal, evert where a near relative is personally interested. And that the provision of the statute, prohibiting any judge from sitting where he is related to either of the parties is controlled by the constitution as the paramount law.

■Order directing all future proceedings in this cause to be ⅛ the name of the present assistant register.