Case ID: nys_57/html/0816-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "CORLAN, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LOCKWOOD v. SELLO.
    (City Court of New York, General Term.
    April 27, 1899.)
    Execution—Supplementary Proceedings—Insufficiency of Affidavit.
    An affidavit for the examination of third persons in supplementary proceedings, made on information and belief, is insufficient, where the relation of the informant to the third persons is not shown.
    Appeal from special term.
    Action by Howard Lockwood against Max Sello. There was a- judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion, to vacate an. order for the examination of third persons in supplementary proceedings defendant appeals.
    Reversed.
    Argued before MCCARTHY, CORLAN, and O’DWYER, JJ.
    Black, Olcott, Gruber & Bonynge, for appellant.
    William G. Brown, for respondeat.
   CORLAN, J.

Appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate an order for the examination of third parties in supplementary proceedings. The affidavit is on information and belief, and the affiant’s source of information does not satisfy us that the order should stand. The relation of his informant to the third parties is not given, except that he was a representative; but in what capacity is not shown, nor does his conversation with the plaintiff strengthen the affidavit. We think it falls within the ruling in Pierce v. Parrish, 28 App. Div. 22, 50 N. Y. Supp. 735, and In re Leslie, 19 Misc. Rep. 670, 44 N. Y, Supp. 1103, and must therefore be reversed.

Order appealed from reversed, with costs. All concur.