Case ID: ga-app_23/html/0309-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

9646.
    Suttles v. Parrish et al.
    
    Decided January 23, 1919.
    Complaint; from Pulton superior court—Judge Ellis. April 4, ,1918. '
    
      Joseph W. & John D. Humphries, for plaintiff in error.'
    
      Bachman & Simmons, Douglas & Douglas, contra.
   Broyles, P. J.

1. Under the facts of the ease, the excerpts from the charge of the court, complained of in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial, contain no error.

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the- court did not err in overruling the motion for a new tidal.

Judgment affirmed.

JBloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.