Case ID: njl_103/html/0487-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

E. & M. LAND COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, APPELLANT.
    Submitted October 29, 1926
    Decided January 31, 1927.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N. J. Mis. R. 467.
    For the respondent, Charles Jones.
    
    For the appellant, Jerome T. Congleton.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 12.

For reversal — if one.