Case ID: f-appx_676/html/0190-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ryan Christopher EADDY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-7283
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: January 18, 2017
    Decided: February 9, 2017
    Ryan Christopher Eaddy, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before KEENAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ryan Christopher Eaddy seeks to appeal the district court’s'order disposing of his post-judgment motion. We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s order and, thus, dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED