Case ID: so2d_399/html/0504-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STONEWALL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Edward HETER, et al, Appellees.
    No. 79-2496.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    June 10, 1981.
    Clark J. Cochran, Jr., of Hainline & Billing, P. A., and Nancy Little Hoffmann, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    Richard A. Barnett and Jon E. Krupnick of Krupnick & Campbell, P. A., Fort Laud-erdale, for appellee, Edward Heter.
   PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment on an uninsured motorist coverage question. We conclude that this is not a final judgment subject to appeal at this time. Further issues remain for determination before the trial court relating to the excess or primary nature of the uninsured motorist coverage in question and the existence of or requirements relating to underlying liability or uninsured motorist coverage. The record indicates the parties are still litigating the issues relating to underlying insurance. We, therefore, dismiss this appeal without prejudice to the rights of any party to raise the same issues after final judgment is entered.

MOORE and BERANEK, JJ., and KAP-NER, LEWIS, Associate Judge, concur.