Case ID: ohio-law-abs_2/html/0412-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 391
    BRYANT HEATER CO. v. KIDD
    Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist., Cuyahoga County
    No. 4912.
    Decided March 3, 1924
    313. CORPORATIONS — Judgment modified on hearing but not reversed.
   PER CURIAM.

Epitomized Opinion

Published Only in Ohio Law Abstract

This case was before the Court of Appeals on an application for a re-hearing. On the original hearing the Court of Appeals had reversed the judgment of the lower court, and rendered a judgment (2 Abs. 216) for Winifred Kidd. Upon the re-hearing, the Court of Appeals reaffirmed its former judgment, but modified the same so as to read:

Attorneys! — Austin & Kirkbride, for Bryant Heater Co.;' Snyder, Henry, Tilden, Ford & Seagrave, for Kidd; all of Cleveland.

“Case reversed and reminded to the Common Pleas Court for further proceedings according to law.”