Case ID: conn_173/html/0759-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

State of Connecticut v. William J. Peay
    
      George D. Stoughton, state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).
    
      Mary V. McCarthy, for the appellant (defendant).
    Argued June 7
    decided June 7, 1977
   It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that unless the defendant files his assignment of errors on or before June 27,1977, the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.