Case ID: cust-ct_1/html/0405-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 39393.
    Protests 176484-G, etc., of Jas. McCreery & Co. et al. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the mer•chandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) wool knit lace wearing apparel similar to that the subject of Abstract 16064 at the appropriate rate under paragraph 1114; (2) bands and flouncings in chief value of artificial silk similar to the merchandise held dutiable as compounds of cellulose in Abstract 37230 at 60 percent under paragraph 31; and (3) embroidered silk net galloons, •embroidered cotton net trimmings, and embroidered silk motifs at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, Abstract 12555 followed.