Case ID: ark_372/html/0306-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dianna Page SAUNDERS v. WILDER BROTHERS SAWMILL, INC., Bobby D. Davis and Len Pitts
    07-1249
    275 S.W.3d 158
    Supreme Court of Arkansas
    Opinion delivered February 7, 2008
   Per Curiam.

We recently accepted a certified question from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. See Saunders v. Wilder Bros. Sawmill, Inc., 372 Ark. 48, 269 S.W.3d 812 (2007) (per curiam). On December 18, 2007, Petitioner moved to dismiss, stating no controversy exists. We denied the motion and noted that the matter was certified to us by the District Court, not the Petitioner, and it was incumbent upon the District Court to withdraw the certified question. See Saunders v. Wilder Bros. Sawmill, Inc., 372 Ark. 185, 271 S.W.3d 522 (2008) (per curiam).

Now we have a request from the District Court to consider the request for review withdrawn.

Request granted; certified question dismissed.

Imber, J., not participating.