Case ID: f-appx_310/html/0617-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kevin D. WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Authur SMITH, Department of Police; S.L. Schultz, #2552; G. Brandt, # 1537; Knode, Ofc.; Dietz, Ofc.; Cindy Messer Smith, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 08-7719.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 28, 2009.
    Decided: Feb. 9, 2009.
    Kevin D. Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Douglas Peter, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellees.
    
      Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin D. Walker appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Walker v. Smith, No. 1:07-cv-02717-RDB (D.Md. Aug. 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.