Case ID: mont_14/html/0462-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE, Respondent, v. McGINNIS et al., Appellants.
    [Submitted May 21, 1894.
    Decided June 5, 1894.]
    See syllabus and opinion in the case of State v. Marion, ante, p. 458.
    
      Appeal from, Second Judicial District, Silver Bow County.
    
    Conviction for sale of liquor in place where women are employed. Defendants were tried before Speer, J.
    Affirmed.
    
      George Haldorn,.and C. L. Campbell, for Appellants.
    
      Attorney General Henri J. ' Haskell, and M. L. Wines, for the state, Respondent.
   Per Curiam.

This case, on appeal, involves questions for consideration and determination entirely like those considered in the case of State v. Marion (just considered and determined), ante, p. 458, and, upon the conclusions there reached, the judgment herein must be likewise affirmed.

It will therefore be ordered that the judgment in the above-entitled cause be, and is hereby, affirmed, and that it be carried into effect by the trial court,' according to the terms and conditions thereof.

Affirmed.

All concur.