Case ID: f-appx_506/html/0245-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Earles M. CRADDOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Keith WHITE, Attorney, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 12-2283.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 22, 2013.
    Decided: Jan. 24, 2013.
    Earles M. Craddock, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Earles M. Craddock appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Craddock’s civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Craddock v. White, No. 1:12-cv-00074-IMK-JSK, 2012 WL 4813790 (N.D.W.Va. Oct. 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.