Case ID: mont_18/html/0292-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

VOGEL, Respondent, v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.
    [Submitted May 13, 1896.
    Decided May 25, 1896.]
    See syllabus and opinion in Moore y. Northern Pacific Railroad Company, ante, page 290_
    
      Appeal from Ninth Judicial District, Gallatin Oounty.
    
    
      Oullen & Toole and Fred M. Dudley, for Appellant.
    
      Hartma/n Bros. & Stewart, for Respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The record in this case presents exactly th( same facts, issues and questions involved iu Colburn v. Northern Pacific R. R. Co., 13 Mont. 476, and Moore v. Northern Pacific R. R. Co. just decided. Upon the authority of thes< cases the judgment appealed from in this case is affirmed.

Affirmed.