Case ID: ga-app_127/html/0351-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Stolz, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

47504.
    ROBBINS v. ROBBINS.
   Stolz, Judge.

The defendant ex-husband appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff ex-wife in her action on a New York judgment for past due alimony payments. Held:

Even assuming that the original alimony agreement is invalid for any of the reasons asserted by the defendant’s answer, the undisputed facts show a ratification of the agreement by the defendant, while represented by counsel, by his subsequent payments thereunder and his incorporation of the agreement in a Mexican divorce decree which he obtained. Brooks v. Hooks, 221 Ga. 229, 235 (144 SE2d 96); Camp v. Hatcher, 119 Ga. App. 63 (166 SE2d 422). The balance of payments due is shown by the evidence; the defendant’s remedy for reducing the amount of his obligation is the revision of the alimony judgment pursuant to Code Ann. § 30-220 (Ga. L. 1955, pp. 630, 631; Ga. L. 1964, pp. 713, 714).

Argued September 7, 1972

Decided October 17, 1972.

Rose M. Higby, for appellant.

Cotton, Katz & White, Richard Katz, for appellee.

Therefore, the grant of summary judgment for the wife was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., concurs. Evans, J., concurs in the judgment only.