Case ID: so2d_613/html/0145-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jean M. DRIVER and Michael J. Driver d/b/a The Escambia Sun-Press, Appellants, v. John R. TUCKER and Ouida G. Tucker, husband and wife, Appellees.
    No. 92-1789.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Feb. 17, 1993.
    T.A. Borowski, Jr., of Emmanuel, Sheppard & Condon, Pensacola, for appellants.
    Fletcher Fleming of Shell, Fleming, Davis & Menge, Pensacola, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellants have appealed a nonfinal order denying their motion for preliminary injunction by which they sought to enforce their alleged right to a prescriptive easement. It appearing that Appellants failed to present sufficient proof to overcome the presumption of permission, the order is affirmed. City of Daytona Beach v. Tona- Rama, Inc., 294 So.2d 73 (Fla.1974); Downing v. Bird, 100 So.2d 57 (Fla.1958).

AFFIRMED.

ZEHMER, BARFIELD and MINER, JJ., concur.