Case ID: or-app_201/html/0206-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Submitted on record and briefs July 1,
    reversed August 10, 2005
    In the Matter of Mary Walker, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MARY WALKER, Appellant.
    
    0411-72506; A126851
    116 P3d 954
    Thomas A. Coleman filed the brief for appellant.
    Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Katherine H. Waldo, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
    Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Wollheim, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Appellant was committed to the custody of the Mental Health Division based on the trial court’s finding that, because of a mental disorder, she is unable to provide for her basic personal needs and is not receiving such care as is necessary for her health or safety. ORS 426.005(l)(d)(B). She appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in finding that the state had proved by clear and convincing evidence that she is unable to provide for her basic needs. The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence to establish the required elements for an order of involuntary commitment. After reviewing the record de novo, State v. O’Neill, 274 Or 59, 61, 545 P2d 97 (1976), we accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.