Case ID: so2d_690/html/0654-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael SEALY, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee.
    No. 96-2199.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    March 13, 1997.
    Rehearing Denied April 16, 1997.
    Michael Sealy, pro se.
    William L. Camper, General Counsel, and Bradley R. Bischoff, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Parole Commission, Tallahassee, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order finding that the claim raised by appellant’s initial petition for writ of mandamus was without merit. Such disposition is without prejudice, however, to appellant’s right to institute a separate proceeding raising his challenges to the computation of his presumptive parole release date, which was established by appel-lee during the pendency of the proceedings below.

WEBSTER, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.