Case ID: nys_129/html/1116-08.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. McLennan, P. j., and ROBSON, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CLARK, Appellant, v. WELLS, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    May 24, 1911.)
    Action hy Louisa T. Clark against A. Judson Wells.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with .costs. Held, that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence, and that the damages are excessive. New trial to be had in the City Court on the 6th day of June, 1911, at 10 o’clock in the forenoon.

McLennan, P. j., and ROBSON, J.,

dissent, and vote for modification by eliminating the first cause of action and affirming the judgment of the Municipal Court as to the balance.