Case ID: nj-eq_52/html/0588-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dominick Coogan et al., appellants, v. Amos H. Van Horn, Limited, respondent.
    On appeal from an order granting an injunction advised by Vice-Chancellor Van Fleet, whose opinion is reported in Van Horn v. Coogan, 7 Dick. Ch. Rep. 880.
    
    
      Mr. Abner Kalisch, for the appellants.
    
      
      Mr. Robert Ii. McCarter, for the respondent.
   Pee Cueiam.

Order affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Gaeeison, Lippincott, Magüe, Eeed, Van Syckel, Bogeet, Beown, Geeen, Keuegee, Sims, Smith — 13.

For reversal — None.