Case ID: sw2d_873/html/0956-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David Allen AMOS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 64592.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    April 26, 1994.
    Emmett D. Quener, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John R. Watson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the motion court’s denial of his ineffective assistance of counsel claim following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We find no error of law appears, and the findings of fact issued by the motion court in denying Movant’s motion are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5).

We further find an opinion in this case would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.