Case ID: so2d_605/html/0181-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Pierre-Michel SMITH, D.M.D., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF DENTISTRY, Appellee.
    No. 92-889.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 6, 1992.
    Norman W. Edwards, for appellant.
    Kathryn L. Kasprzak, Staff Atty., and Lisa S. Nelson, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Larry MacPherson, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FERGUSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm, in all respects, the final order of the Department of Regulation, except that we reverse that portion of the order which finds that appellant made “deceptive, untrue, or fraudulent representations in the practice of dentistry.” See Elmariah v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Medicine, 574 So.2d 164 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Britt v. Department of Professional Regulation, 492 So.2d 697 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Gershanik v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Medical Examiners, 458 So.2d 302 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), review denied, 462 So.2d 1106 (Fla.1985).