Case ID: f-appx_96/html/0883-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rodney Victor HARRIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Angi Nicole MORRIS, Attorney At Law; Gilmer, Sadler, Ingram, Sutherland & Hutton, L.L.P., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 03-2500.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted April 23, 2004.
    Decided May 11, 2004.
    Rodney Victor Harris, Appellant pro se. Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., Guynn, Memmer & Dillon, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia; Phillip Verne Anderson, Kevin Osborne Barnard, Frith, Anderson & Peake, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Rodney Victor Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and state law. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Harris’s motions for a stay, to supplement the record with circuit court transcripts, and for a continuance, and we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Harris v. Morris, No. CA-03-560-7 (W.D.Va. Nov. 14, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED