Case ID: f2d_866/html/0797-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Howard RUDOLPH and Linda Magoon Rudolph, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Dr. Sandra ROBINSON, Ben Meyers, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 88-3384.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    March 1, 1989.
    Johnnie A. Jones, Jr., Jones & Jones, Baton Rouge, La., for plaintiffs-appellants.
    Roy A. Mongrue, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Louisiana Dept, of Justice, Baton Rouge, La., for defendants-appellees.
    
      Before GEE, WILLIAMS, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Good cause existed for setting aside the default in this case involving the welfare of small children, and the trial judge properly-abstained from exercising jurisdiction in factual circumstances all but identical to those presented in Moore v. Sims, 442 U.S. 415, 99 S.Ct. 2371, 60 L.Ed.2d 994 (1979).

AFFIRMED.