Case ID: ad_198/html/0914-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gussie Rosenzweig, Appellant, v. The Dime Savings Bank of Williamsburg and Barnet Rosenzweig, Respondents.
   The real ownership of this bank deposit and how far it was known to Mr. Rosenzweig seem doubtful, and we, therefore, afford the plaintiff a new trial. Hence the judgment and findings numbered 4, 5 and 6, are severally reversed, with the conclusion of law, as against the weight of the evidence, and a new trial is granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Blaekmar, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Jaycox, JJ., concur.