Case ID: sw3d_258/html/0928-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. William A. POWELL, Appellant.
    No. WD 68403.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Aug. 12, 2008.
    Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, and Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before DIV III: ELLIS, P.J., HARDWICK and DANDURAND JJ.
   Order

PER CURIAM.

William Powell challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for driving while intoxicated, a violation of Section 577.010, RSMo 2000. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the* parties, we affirm the judgment of conviction. Rule 30.25(b).