Case ID: so2d_551/html/1281-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rose Marie HALL, as Guardian and next friend of Lisa Marie Hall, and Rose Marie Hall, individually, Appellants, v. CITY OF HIALEAH, Appellee.
    No. 89-1555.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 21, 1989.
    Klein & Tannen and Alan D. Sackrin, North Miami Beach, for appellants.
    Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder & Carson and Robert L. Teitler, Miami, for appellee.
    Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellee has conceded error in the trial court’s failure to grant a motion for new trial as to past and future non-economic damages. Finding that the trial court erred, Stevens v. Mount Vernon Fire Ins. Co., 395 So.2d 1206 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Pickel v. Rosen, 214 So.2d 730 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); Goff v. 392208 Ontario, Ltd., 539 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); see also Horowitz v. Florida Ins. Guar. Assoc., 544 So.2d 281 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Gonzalez v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 463 So.2d 1229 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Skelly v. Hartford Casualty Ins. Co., 445 So.2d 415 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), we reverse and remand for a new trial on the issue of past and future non-economic damages.