Case ID: f-appx_20/html/0234-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ricky HAGENBUCH; Cathy Hagenbuch; Ricky Hagenbuch Building Contractor, Incorporated; Healthful Living, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION; SBC Communications, Incorporated, d/b/a Southwestern Bell Telephone Company; Pacific Bell Telephone Company; Southwestern Bell Internet Services, Incorporated, d/b/a SBC Internet Services, Incorporated; Pacific Bell Internet Services; SBC Advanced Solutions, Incorporated, a/k/a ASI, Defendants-Appellees, and Ameritech, Incorporated; DSL Technologies, Incorporated; ASI Computer Technologies, Incorporated, Defendants.
    No. 01-1405.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 28, 2001.
    Decided Oct. 16, 2001.
    Stephen R Palmer, Stephen R. Palmer, Esq., P.C., Alexandria, VA, for appellants. Kent A. Gardiner, Christopher J. Huber, James C. Cooper, Crowell & Moring, L.L.P., Washington, DC; Emily M. Yinger, James S. Rixse, Hogan & Hartson, L.L.P., McLean, VA, for appellees.
    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal from the district court’s order dismissing their civil complaint for failure to state a claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Our review of the record included on appeal and the parties’ briefs discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hagenbuch v. Compaq Computer Corp., No. CA-00-2073-A (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 7, 2001; entered Feb. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.