Case ID: njl_74/html/0851-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THOMAS STOKES ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. ALBERT HARDY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    Argued March 8, 1907 —
    Decided June 17, 1907.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    Eor the plaintiff in error, Freeman Woodbridge.
    
    Eor the defendant in error, Aaron V. Dawes.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice. Dixon in that court, reported in 44 Vroom 255.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Port, Hendrickson, Pitney, Seed, Trenci-iard, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 13.

For reversal — Hone.