Case ID: f-appx_687/html/0288-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William Douglas HAMPTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX PETERSBURG; Eric Wilson, Warden; Maurice Danzey, Associate Warden; L. Humphrey, Recreation Supervisor; R. Spears, Education Supervisor; R. Hutchings, Associate Warden; D. DiCocco, Health Services Administrator; M. Reynolds, Director of Psychology; P. Hilletework, Mid-Level Practitioner; S. Harris, Legal Administrator; A. Lewis, Associate Warden; K. Kiddy, Unit A/B Manager, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 17-6144
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 25, 2017
    Decided: April 28, 2017
    William Douglas Hampton, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

■ Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Douglas Hampton, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his declaratory judgment action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2012) for failure to state a claim. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hampton’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Hampton has for-' feited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we deny Hampton’s motion for declaratory judgment and affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED