Case ID: f-appx_413/html/0599-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alison Levon BOYD, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 10-7288.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 20, 2011.
    Decided: Feb. 15, 2011.
    Alison Levon Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Randall Stuart Galyon, Office of the United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed in part; dismissed in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

By notice filed September 14, 2010, Alison Levon Boyd appeals the district court’s four pre-judgment orders entered on April 19, 2010. With regard to the order denying the motion for the return of property submitted under Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e), we conclude we have jurisdiction and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. United States v. Boyd, No. 1:08-cr-00493-MJH-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2010). Because no appealable final judgment was entered when Boyd filed his notice of appeal and because a second notice of appeal has since been filed from the final judgment, we dismiss the appeal from the remaining orders. See United States v. Pardee, 356 F.2d 982 (4th Cir.1966). The appeal from the final judgment is sufficient to raise every question arising from the proceedings below. We deny as moot Boyd’s motions for appointment of counsel and for transcripts. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART.