Case ID: f2d_416/html/0970-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ed PIERCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
    No. 23409.
    United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
    Oct. 17, 1969.
    Richard G. Sherman (argued), of Sherman & Sturman, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellant.
    Gerald F. Uelmen (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Wm. Matthew Byrne, Jr., U. S. Atty., Charles Magnuson, David R. Nissen, Asst. U. S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
    Before CHAMBERS, ELY and KIL-KENNY, Circuit Judges.
   DECISION

PER CURIAM:

The appeal from the decision of the district court is dismissed. In the present circumstances, the court finds the appeal premature.

Of course, the decision is not on the merits and therefore not res judicata on the merits of Pierce’s claims with reference to the seized material.

In Goodman v. United States, 9 Cir., 369 F.2d 166, the material on which the court acted was in the frame of a fishing expedition. We do not find the case applicable here and think the general rule of DiBella v. United States, 369 U.S. 121, 132, 82 S.Ct. 654, 7 L.Ed.2d 614, applies.