Case ID: so2d_505/html/0022-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marie I. ANDERSON and Ernest Anderson, Appellants, v. Willie REDDEN, Jr., Appellee.
    No. 86-1686.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 7, 1987.
    Patton & Kanner and Cromwell A. Anderson, Miami, for appellants.
    Terrence E. Rosenberg, Miami Beach, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The summary judgment below is reversed because the plaintiff-movant did not conclusively obviate the affirmative defense of fraud. See Nagelbush v. United Postal Savings Ass’n, 504 So.2d 782 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Holly Hill Acres, Ltd. v. Charter Bank, 314 So.2d 209 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); see also Aroll v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp., 496 So.2d 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); O’Neal v. Brady, 476 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Proprietors Ins. v. Siegel, 410 So.2d 993 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).