Case ID: nj_172/html/0293-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

798 A.2d 83
    CLAIRE PHILIPP, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT STAHL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued April 29, 2002
    Decided June 12, 2002.
    
      James G. O’Donohue argued the cause for appellant (Hill Wallack, attorneys).
    
      Anthony B. Vignuolo argued the cause for respondent (Borrus, Goldin, Foley, Vignuolo, Hyman & Stahl, attorneys; Jack Borrus and Peter A. Vignuolo, of counsel and on the brief).
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Wecker’s dissenting opinion, reported at 344 N.J.Super. at 274, 781 A.2d 1065 (2001).

For reversal — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, and ZAZZALI join in this opinion — 7.

Opposed — None.