Case ID: f2d_17/html/0688-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re FORSYTH.
    (Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
    Submitted January 10, 1927.
    Decided February 7, 1927.)
    No. 1878.
    Patents <@=66(4) — Applicant for patent for ornamental design for disk wheel held barred by existing patents, if not anticipated by prior art.
    Applicant for patent for ornamental design for disk wheel held completely barred by existing patents cited by Commissioner, if not anticipated by prior disclosures in the art.
    Appeal from Commissioner of Patents.
    In the matter of the application of George H. Forsyth for patent. From a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, denying application, applicant appeals.
    Affirmed.
    L. T. Greist, of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
    T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
    • Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.
   VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

Appellant was denied a .patent on a claim for an ornamental design for a disk wheel, and accordingly this appeal was taken.

We deem it unnecessary to consider the case at length, as we are clearly of the opinion that, if appellant’s design would be patentable, in the absence of anticipation by the disclosures of the prior art, he is completely barred by existing patents cited in the decisions of the tribunals below.

The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed: