Case ID: f2d_189/html/0702-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marie E. BARWICK, Petitioner v. Hinda S. MANHEIM, Respondent.
    Misc. No. 285.
    United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
    Argued May 24, 1951.
    Decided June 7, 1951.
    Jo V. Morgan, Jr., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
    James M. Desmond, Washington, D. C., with whom Roy B. Kelly, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for respondent.
    Before EDGERTON and BAZELON, Circuit Judges, and ARTHUR F. LEDERLE, District Judge sitting by designation.
   PER CURIAM.

The petition for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is denied. Wells v. United States, 318 U.S. 257, 63 S.Ct. 582, 87 L.Ed. 746; Newman v. United States, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 419, 184 F.2d 275.