Case ID: so2d_274/html/0010-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gladys VEIGA et al., Appellants, v. SOUTH CAROLINA INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Appellees.
    No. 72-891.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 6, 1973.
    Spear & Johnston, Miami Beach, for appellants.
    Corlett, Merritt, Killian & Okell, Miami, for appellees.
    Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appealed a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant in a personal injury action. We find merit in the appeal. The evidence before the court on hearing the motion for summary judgment disclosed the existence of a tria-ble issue as to assumption of risk by the plaintiff which could not properly be determined by summary judgment.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings.