Case ID: ad_227/html/0643-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nathan M. Gilbert, Respondent, v. Harry S. Koffman, Appellant.
    
    
      
       Affd., 252 N. Y. 602.
    
   Judgment affirmed, with costs. Van Kirk, P. J., Whitmyer and Hasbrouek, JJ., concur; Hinman and Davis, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal and a new trial on the ground that no question of fraud was asserted or submitted to the jury, and that the plaintiff at all times had in his possession a written agreement showing exactly the amount due and payable by him on the automobile.