Case ID: ga-app_32/html/0502-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodwortii, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

15609.
    Dixon v. The State.
    Decided July 15, 1924.
    Indictment• for assault with intent to murder; from Houston superior court — Judge Mathews. January 26, 1924.
    
      Marx Eum, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Charles H. Garrett, solicitor-general, contra.
   Bloodwortii, J.

There is no merit in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial; the evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luhe, J., concur.