Case ID: so2d_640/html/1196-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Victor MONTESINO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 94-191.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Aug. 2, 1994.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Manuel Alvarez, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Stephanie G. Kolman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and COPE, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the sole point directed to the convictions entered below. See Nacher v. State, 465 So.2d 598 (Fla. 3d DCA1985). As the state concedes, however, it was improper to impose consecutive habitual offender sentences for offenses committed in the same criminal episode. See Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993). Hence, after remand, those sentences shall be made concurrent.

Affirmed as modified.