Case ID: so2d_460/html/1031-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

S.C.H. REALTY, INC., Appellant, v. SOUTH BAYSHORE DEVELOPMENT CORP., C. Robert Cusick, L. Ronald Capozzoli and Richard Vazza, Edward J. DeBartolo, Appellee.
    No. 84-1153.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Jan. 2, 1985.
    
      Lapidus & Stettin and Richard Lapidus, Miami, for appellant. .
    Smith & Mandler and Mitchell Mandler and Patricia M. Silver, Miami Beach, Wright & Carauana, Miami, for appellee.
    Before NESBITT, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final summary judgment against appellant, S.C.H. Realty, Inc. [S.C.H.] upon a finding that seller-principal, South Bayshore Development Corporation [South Bayshore], is not liable to subagent-broker S.C.H. in light of the undisputed evidence in the record indicating that South Bayshore neither directly contracted with S.C.H. to retain its services nor authorized or ratified the employment of S.C.H. Whidden v. Morse, 213 So.2d 625 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968).

Affirmed.