Case ID: or-app_86/html/0359-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted December 5, 1986,
    affirmed July 8, 1987
    In the Matter of the Compensation of Steven Stedman, Claimant. STEDMAN, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION et al, Respondents.
    
    (WCB No. 85-07815; CA A39522)
    738 P2d 1015
    Peter Fahy, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief was Steven C. Yates, Eugene.
    Christine Chute, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
    Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that affirmed the referee’s award of 75% permanent disability. He asserts that he is permanently and totally disabled. In 1983, claimant, then age 24, sustained a lumbar strain when he fell off a log while working as a choker setter. He is unable to return to heavy labor, which has been his only type of work experience. He is of limited intellectual capability and can neither read nor write. He has twice been referred to vocational training programs. He failed to report for scheduled appointments and to cooperate in attempts to rehabilitate him. On the basis of the record, we do not agree with claimant that an attempt at vocational rehabilitation would be futile. The Board correctly affirmed the referee, who concluded that claimant has not sustained his burden to prove that he has made reasonable efforts to obtain employment. See ORS 656.206(1), (3).

Affirmed.