Case ID: f-appx_367/html/0792-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

OMNI HOME FINANCING, INC., A California Corporation; Keith W. Murphy, An Individual; Anthony A. Gaglione, An Individual; David A. Bancroft, An Individual; Omni Home Financing, Inc. 412(I) Defined Benefit Plan, an Employee Benefits Plan Under Erisa, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation; Paul Bannock, an Individual, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 08-56431.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Feb. 23, 2010.
    Marc Schechter, Esquire, Susan Meter, Esquire, Butterfield Schechter LLP, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    Dan Marmalefsky, David Frank McDowell, Jr., Esquire, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
    D.C. No. 3:06-ev-00921-IEG-JMA, Southern District of California, San Diego.
    Before: THOMAS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and BEISTLINE, Chief District Judge.
    
      
       The Honorable Ralph R. Beistline, United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.
    
   ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation by the parties, and for good cause shown, this case is dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear their respective costs and attorneys’ fees. A certified copy of this order sent to the district court shall constitute the mandate.