Case ID: a2d_145/html/0288-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Betty Louise HARRINGTON, Appellant, v. Marshall C. HARRINGTON, Appellee.
    No. 2254.
    Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
    Argued Sept. 22, 1958.
    Decided Oct. 28, 1958.
    Julius Poms, Washington, D. C., with whom Sidney S. Sachs and Lewis Jacobs, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant.
    Katherine M. Staley, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
    Before ROVER,. Chief Judge, and HOOD and QUINN, Associate Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

The background for this appeal may be found in our opinion in Harrington v. Harrington, D.C.Mun.App., 145 A.2d 121. While the main appeals were pending the wife moved to have the husband adjudged in contempt for failure to make payments for support of the child, and also moved for judgment against the husband for the arrears in such payments. The trial court denied the motions and this appeal was taken from that denial. In the light of our opinion on the main appeals we find no error in this appeal.

Affirmed.