Case ID: ill-app_202/html/0042-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr! Justice MoGoorty", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anton J. Cermak, Bailiff, for use of Staver Carriage Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. American Surety Company of New York and David Jetzinger, Defendants in Error.
    Gen. No. 21,626.
    (Not to be reported in full.)
    Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Chables N. Goodnow, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1915.
    Affirmed.
    Opinion filed November 14, 1916.
    Rehearing denied November 24, 1916.
    Statement of the Case.
    Action by Anton J. Cermak, bailiff of the Municipal Court of Chicago, for the use of Staver Carriage Company, a corporation, plaintiff, against the American Suretv Comuany of New York and David Jet-zinger, defendants, in the Municipal Court of Chicago. To reverse a judgment for defendants for costs, plaintiff prosecutes this writ of error.
    Bulkley, More & Tallmadge, for plaintiff in error.
    John M. Zane, for defendants in error.
    
      
      See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.
    
   Mr! Justice MoGoorty

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision.

Appeal and ebbob, § 1014 —what essential to review of rulings on propositions of law. In order to enable the Appellate Court to review alleged errors of the trial court in holding propositions of law in a case tried without a jury, it is necessary not only that such propositions shall have been submitted to the trial court, but also that the rulings of the court thereon shall be preserved in the record.