Case ID: njl_112/html/0098-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HARRY K. USLAN, RESPONDENT, v. JAMES BOWEN, APPELLANT.
    Submitted October 27, 1933
    Decided January 5, 1934.
    Por the respondent, Irving Charles Piclcer.
    
    Por the appellant, Edward P. Stout.
    
   Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Paekee, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.