Case ID: f-appx_517/html/0885-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario Montenegro ENRIQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 12-12585
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    April 26, 2013.
    Susan Hollis Rothstein-Youakim, Matthew Jackson, Robert E. O’Neill, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Jorge Leon Chálela, Chalela Law Group, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Mario Montenegro Enriquez, Miami, FL, pro se.
    
      Before HULL, JORDAN and FAY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Jorge Chalela, appointed counsel for Mario Montenegro-Enriquez, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Montenegro-Enriquez’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.