Case ID: njl_104/html/0449-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JESSIE STEVENS ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. SOMERSET BUS COMPANY, INCORPORATED, ET AL., APPELLANTS. MARY BERNHARDT ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. SOMERSET BUS COMPANY, INCORPORATED, ET AL., APPELLANTS. LOUIZA STOLTZ, RESPONDENT, v. SOMERSET BUS COMPANY, INCORPORATED, ET AL., APPELLANTS.
    Submitted October 28, 1927
    Decided February 6, 1928.
    Por the appellants, Edward A. Marlceley and Jacob Schneider.
    
    Por the respondents, Robert Newton Orane.
    
   Per Curiam.

These three eases were tried together. They all arose out of injuries received by the respective female plaintiffs, who were passengers in a bus of the Somerset Bus Company, in a collision between that bus and a truck belonging to Hearn & Son, Incorporated, the other defendant. The trial resulted in verdicts against both defendants for each of the plaintiffs, and the former have appealed from the judgments entered thereon.

Our consideration of the several grounds for reversal argued by the counsel of the appellants leads us to the conclusion that in no one of the rulings or instructions by the trial court which are made the basis of these appeals was there harmful error, and that the questions raised are, none of them, of sufficient legal importance to justify specific discussion.

The judgments under review will be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yah Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.