Case ID: sw3d_546/html/0596-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Darnell L. WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 105447
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    FILED: January 30, 2018 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 22, 2018
    Amy E. Lowe, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Joshua D. Hawley, Nathan J. Aquino, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM

Darnell Wilson ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The State charged Movant in two separate cases. In one case, the State charged Movant with one count of the Class D felony of stealing, third offense. In the second case, the State charged Movant with the class C felony of assault on a law enforcement officer in the second degree, the Class D felony of stealing, third offense, and the Class D felony of resisting arrest by fleeing. Movant agreed to plead guilty to all counts in both cases. The court sentenced Movant to concurrent sentences of five years for assault of a law enforcement officer in the second degree, two years for stealing, third offense, and two years for resisting arrest. The motion court denied an evidentiary hearing for post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).