Case ID: f-appx_426/html/0576-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Francis GRANDINETTI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FTC SEG. UNIT STAFF; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 07-16339.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 5, 2011.
    
    Filed April 12, 2011.
    Francis Grandinetti, pro se.
    Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Francis Grandinetti, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing, under the “three strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1118 (9th Cir.2005). We affirm.

Grandinetti has waived any issue on appeal by failing to make any arguments in his opening brief. See Indep. Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir.2003) (“[W]e will not consider any claims that were not actually argued in appellant’s opening brief.”).

Grandinetti’s requests set forth in letters submitted March 13, 2009 and June 12, 2009 are denied.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.