Case ID: f-appx_425/html/0409-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Henry W. SKINNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lynn SWITZER, District Attorney for the 31st Judicial District of Texas, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 10-70002.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    May 18, 2011.
    Robert Charles Owen, Esq., Owen & Rountree, L.L.P., Austin, TX, Douglas George Robinson, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Mark D. White, Sprouse Shrader Smith, P.C., Amarillo, IX, for Defendant-Appel-lee.
    Before SMITH, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
   ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM:

The Supreme Court reversed and remanded this court’s affirmance of the district court’s dismissal. Skinner v. Switzer, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 1289, 179 L.Ed.2d 233 (2011). We VACATE and REMAND the judgment of the district court for further proceedings in accordance with the Supreme Court’s directive. We express no view on what decisions the district court should make on remand. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.