Case ID: njl_113/html/0160-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

E. LEONARD FRYLING AND HARRY F. FRYLING, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. HOWARD RUSS AND WARREN K. RUSS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
    Argued May 22, 1934
    — Decided May 24, 1934.
    For the defendants-appellants, Howard Faslwood.
    
    For the plaintiffs-respondents, French, Richards & Bradley (Floyd H. Bradley).
    
   Per Curiam.

From an examination of the record in this case it is apparent that there were fact questions presented which were submitted by the trial judge to the jury in a charge that was faultless so far as any question is presented for our determination.

The judgment is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ciiiee Justice, Teen-chard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Dear, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Hone.