Case ID: ohio-law-abs_6/html/0725-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DURST et v. STATE ex WATMOUGH et.
    Ohio Supreme Court.
    No. 21267.
    Decided Oct. 24, 1928.
    Syllabus by Editorial Staff.
    SCHOOLS AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS.
    (530 D) Written remonstrance against organization of new rural school district, required to contain signatures of majority of all electors in all townships affected.
   HISTORY: — Rural school district dissolved and, on same day, new district created, including additional territory. Remonstrance filed. Board of education held remonstrance not sufficient as to signatures. Court of Appeals holds that remonstrance required to contain majority of all electors in each of three townships affected. Relator prosecutes error. Judgment affirmed.

. Reference to full opinion will appear in Omnibus Index of later date.