Case ID: so2d_689/html/1149-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HILTON INTERNATIONAL CO., etc., et al., Appellants, v. ROBOBAR, INC., etc., et al., Appellees.
    No. 96-1511.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Feb. 26, 1997.
    Rehearing Denied April 9, 1997.
    Anderson, Moss, Sherouse & Petros; Hicks, Anderson & Blum and lia J. Klion, Miami, for appellants.
    
      Armstrong & Mejer and Timothy Armstrong, Coral Gables, for appellees.
    Before NESBITT, GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Hyatt Corp. v. Howarth, 678 So.2d 823, 824 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)(“We may not, under the abuse of discretion standard, simply supplant [the trial court’s decision to either grant or deny a motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds] with this court’s preference on a de novo review of the same venue factors.”).