Case ID: ohio-st_112/html/0564-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "By the Court.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Village of New London v. Starbird.
    
      Supreme Court — Affirmances—Equal division of judges — Negligence — Municipal corporations — Sidewalk and bridge approach.
    
    Appeal and Error, 4 C. J. § 3113.
    (No. 18621
    Decided April 21, 1925.)
    Error to the Court of Appeals of Huron county.
    
      Mr. G. Ray Craig and Messrs. Young & Young, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Messrs. Rowley & Carpenter, for defendant in error.
   By the Court.

In the foregoing case Jones, Matthias and Day, JJ., reach the conclusion that no prejudicial error has intervened and that the judgment of the court below should be affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., and Allen and Robinson, JJ., are of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed.

Kinkade, J., having been a member of the Court of Appeals that heard and decided this case, and whose record is now before this court for consideration, does not participate herein.

For the foregoing reasons, there not being four judges that have reached a common conclusion, it follows that, there not being a majority of the court in favor of reversal, the judgment of the Court of Appeals stands affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Jones, Matthias and Day, JJ., concur.

Kinkade, J., not participating.