Case ID: sw3d_23/html/0671-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Clinton WILLIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 75960.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    May 23, 2000.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 6,2000.
    Application for Transfer Denied Aug. 29, 2000.
    Mary S. Choi, St. Louis, for appellant. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, III, Andrea L. Mazza, Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent.
    Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Clinton Willis (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without a hearing. We previously affirmed his convictions for first-degree assault, Section 565.050, RSMo 1994; second-degree assault, Section 565.060, RSMo 1994; and two counts of armed criminal action, Section 571.015, RSMo 1994. State v. Willis, 966 S.W.2d 313, 314 (Mo.App. E.D.1998).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).