Case ID: wv-ct-cl_12/html/0069-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Opinion issued January 6, 1978
    
    BRADFORD G. FRAZIER vs. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
    (No. CC-77-201)
    No appearance on behalf of claimant.
    
      Richard Carlton, Attorney at Law, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision on the agreed facts set forth in a written stipulation, which revealed the following: that on September 19, 1977, respondent was engaged in the repair of a portion of 1-64 near the Ona Exchange and had routed traffic on 1-64 onto the exit ramp at the exchange; that respondent had knowledge of a large hole on the paved portion of the ramp but had made no repairs and had failed to erect any warning signs; that on September 19, 1977, at about 6:30 a.m., the claimant was directed onto the ramp by respondent; that the claimant was exercising due care but did not observe the hole until it was impossible to stop and avoid striking the same; and that as a proximate result of respondent’s negligence, the claimant’s vehicle struck the hole and was damaged to the extent of $160.48. By reason of the foregoing, and believing that the amount of damages is fair and reasonable, we hereby make an award in favor of the claimant in the amount of $160.48.

Award of $160.48.