Case ID: so2d_408/html/0082-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "JONES, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Steven D. PUGH v. Virgil KITSON.
    80-728.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Oct. 30, 1981.
    Rehearing Denied Dec. 18, 1981.
    Steven D. Pugh, pro se.
    J. N. Holt, Birmingham, for appellee.
   JONES, Justice.

Appellant seeks to challenge on five separate and several grounds the propriety of the trial court’s denial of a new trial.

We have made a thorough and painstaking effort to identify each of .the alleged errors in the record of trial before us. Without exception, none of the issues presented is traceable to a specific adverse ruling by the trial court which was properly preserved for appellate review. See Rule 51, ARCP.

We affirm.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.