Case ID: f-appx_215/html/0822-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HOME DESIGN SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCHWAB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation, d.b.a. Schwab Custom Homes, William D. Klein, Michael P. Schwab, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 06-10003.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Jan. 24, 2007.
    Kimberly Lynn Boldt, The Boldt Law Firm, Boca Raton, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Brian R. Gilchrist, Jeffrey Scott Boyles, Allen, Dyer, Doppelt, Milbrath & Gilchrist, P.A., Orlando, FL, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before ANDERSON, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

After oral argument and careful consideration, and for the reasons fully discussed at oral argument, we conclude that the district court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that there were no satisfactory lesser sanctions. We conclude that there has been no abuse of discretion, and that the judgment of the district court dismissing this case with prejudice is due to be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.