Case ID: ny-super-ct_45/html/0633-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MARY E. SACIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NEAL W. O’CONNOR, Defendant and Appellant.
    
    Before Curtis, Ch. J., and Freedman, J.
    
      Decided November 11, 1879.
    Appeal by defendant- from an order denying his motion for a new trial and for the making of one Lockwood a party defendant.
    The action is ejectment. It appeared in the papers that defendant withdrew his answer, and that judgment had been taken by consent.
    
      A. J. Roe, attorney, and of counsel, for appellant.
    
      Ira D. Warren, of counsel, for defendant.
    
      
       Decision in this case affirmed by court-of appeals, December 16, 1879; 9 Weekly Dig. 397.
    
   Per Curiam.

Order affirmed with costs.