Case ID: so2d_569/html/1388-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jonathan Lynch DEDO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 90-0830.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Nov. 28, 1990.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Allen J. DeWeese, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John M. Koenig, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises two points, neither of which we conclude to have merit, but one of which warrants discussion.

We hold that appellant waived his right to a determination of his ability to pay the restitution subsequently ordered by the trial court by failing to preserve same when entering his plea. The only issue which was preserved and remained for the trial court was the amount of restitution.

ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and OFTEDAL, RICHARD L., Associate Judge, concur.