Case ID: sw3d_533/html/0238-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "ORDER PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bryan EVANS, Appellant.
    No. ED 104710
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: November 7, 2017
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Jay L. Kanzler, Jr., 2001 S. Big Bend Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63117.
    ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Christine K. Lesicko, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899,' Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.
    Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Sherri B. Sullivan and Kurt S. Odenwald, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bryan Evans (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment entered after a jury trial on his convictions for numerous counts of assault, armed criminal action, unlawful use of a weapon and burglary. We find no clear error in the denial of Defendant’s challenge under' Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), no plain error in accepting the verdicts and no abuse of discretion in the admission of 911 tapes. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).