Case ID: nj-eq_107/html/0577-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lucy B. Pound et al., complainants-appellants, v. Henry W. Pleister, defendant-respondent.
    [Argued May 26th, 1930.
    Decided February 2d, 1931.]
    
      Mr. Earl A. Merrill, for the appellants.
    ■ ■ No appearance, for the respondents.
   Per Curiam.

This is an action for specific performance and the learned vice-chancellor dismissed the bill of complaint, from which decree so advised the complainant below appeals.

Without going into details it is sufficient to say that we conclude that the opinion of this court in Lennig v. Ocean City Association, 41 N. J. Eq. 606, is controlling and for that reason the decree below is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Van Bus-kirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.