Case ID: ad_215/html/0784-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

First National Bank of Secaucus, Respondent, v. Michael A. Di Menna, Appellant, Impleaded with Others, Defendants.
   Order granting new trial reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs to the appellant; verdict of the jury reinstated, and judgment directed for defendant in accordance therewith, with costs. We can see no sound reason for the granting of the motion. There was abundant evidence to sustain the verdict, and none of the rulings made by the trial court during the trial, and which were excepted to, were prejudicial to plaintiff. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur.