Case ID: f-appx_464/html/0650-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fidel DIAZ-LEMUS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 11-10002.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 19, 2011.
    
    Filed Dec. 30, 2011.
    Monte Cress Clausen, USTU—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Adam N. Bleier, Law Offices of Adam N. Bleier, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    
      Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Fidel Diaz-Lemus appeals from the 12-month sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Diaz-Lemus contends that the district court failed to consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors in imposing the consecutive 12-month sentence, and that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The district court did not procedurally err and Diaz-Lemus’ within-Guidelines sentence is reasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(a)(l), (f).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.