Case ID: so3d_103/html/0133-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Craig B. DANIELS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. SC11-1646.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Nov. 8, 2012.
    Carlos Fernando Gonzalez of Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP, Miami, FL, for Petitioner.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals Division, and Charles Richey McCoy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision in Daniels v. State, 66 So.3d 328 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.