Case ID: cole-cai-cas_1/html/0421-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n     Livingston, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rogers v. Garrison.
    THIS cause had, at the last New-York sitting's^ been set down for trial on the day docket, but from some little confusion as to the suits that would be heard before the respective judges, who separately at different times presided, the counsel did not attend. A motion Was made for judgment as m case oi non-suit. . J °
   Per Curiam.

Stipulate and pay costs.

Livingston, J.

I dissent from this, because the only use of a day docket is to enable the bar to know what causes will come on, and it then becomes their duty to attend. If we allow of excuses of this sort, the force of the rule,' in the city of New-York, by which day dockets have been established, will be to,tally done away.