Case ID: ala-app_25/html/0685-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SAMFORD, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

147 So. 926
    Council TAYLOR v. STATE.
    8 Div. 486.
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    April 11, 1933.
    See, also, ante, p. 408, 147 So. 647.
    Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.
   SAMFORD, Judge.

Under the evidence in this case the guilt of the defendant was a question for the jury.

'We are moved to say that there are some circumstances connected with this prosecution which tend to show that this charge is the result of malice on the part of some of the witnesses, but, in the absence of error in the trial, we are powerless. The case is one for the pardoning power.

The judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.