Case ID: so3d_135/html/0280-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "POLSTON, C.J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner(s) v. Robin CURRAN, Respondent(s).
    No. SC12-157.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    March 13, 2014.
    
      PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
    POLSTON, C.J., dissents with an opinion, in which CANADY, J., concurs.
   POLSTON, C.J.,

dissenting.

Because I would order the trial court to vacate the judgment against State Farm, I would deny Curran’s motion for attorney’s fees and grant State Farm’s Case No. SC12-157 Page 2 motion for attorney’s fees, conditioned upon the trial court’s finding that State Farm is entitled to fees pursuant to its proposal for settlement.

CANADY, J., concurs.