Case ID: f3d_47/html/1090-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fredel WILLIAMSON, a/k/a “Fred”, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 89-8938
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    March 16, 1995.
    Benjamin S. Waxman, Frederick S. Robbins, Weiner, Robbins, Tunkey & Ross, P.A., Miami, FL, for appellant.
    Deborah A. Griffin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Mike Solis, Charles Cox, Macon, GA, David S. Kris, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Crim. Div., Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for appel-lee.
   ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, HATCHETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In its opinion published as Williamson v. United States, 512 U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 2431, 129 L.Ed.2d 476 (1994), the United States Supreme Court vacated this court’s judgment and remanded the ease for further proceedings consistent with its opinion.

Further proceedings in this case will involve issues relating to the government’s ability or desire to continue this prosecution, issues that can be better resolved in the district court.

Accordingly, this case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Court’s opinion.

REMANDED.