Case ID: misc2d_17/html/0512-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jacob S. Grazi, Appellant, v. Douglaston Estates, Inc., Respondent. Julius Goldberg et al., Appellants, v. Douglaston Estates, Inc., Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    November 24, 1958.
    
      Berman t0 Tomaselli (Charles Sutton of counsel), for appellants.
    
      Holman<0 Holman {Paul C. Fusco of counsel), for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

By proceeding to trial, plaintiffs waived their right to appeal from that part of the order which granted defendant’s motion to open its default and permitted it to interpose an answer herein. No appeal lies from the order insofar as it denied plaintiffs’ cross-motion to strike out the appearance of the attorneys purporting to act in the name of the defendant ” (Nassau County District Court Act, § 190; L. 1939, ch. 274).

The appeals from order should be dismissed, with $5 costs in each case.

Concur — Pette, Di Giovanna and Brown, JJ.

Appeals dismissed, etc.