Case ID: so2d_558/html/1104-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re ESTATE OF Ruth BAKST, Deceased.
    No. 89-0287.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    April 11, 1990.
    Samuel S. Smith, James R. George, and James Jordan of Ruden, Barnett, McClo-sky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A., Miami, for appellant, Alvin A. Bakst.
    Wilson Smith and Rohan Kelley of Rohan Kelley, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee, Robert Bakst.
   PER CURIAM.

Because the record reflects genuine issues of material fact, we reverse the order dismissing appellant's petition as sham. We specifically do not address the question raised concerning whether appellant’s claim is time barred.

ANSTEAD, STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.