Case ID: f-appx_128/html/0666-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Leonora ROTAR; Viorel Rotar, Plaintiffs- Appellants, v. Colette SKAGGS, Deputy DA, Placer County; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 04-15745.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted May 9, 2005.
    
    Decided May 13, 2005.
    Leonora Rotar, Carmichael, CA, pro se.
    Viorel Rotar, Carmichael, CA, pro se.
    Mark W. Rathe, Esq., Office of the County Counsel, Auburn, CA, Scott Wyck-off, AGCA-Offiee of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Leonora and Viorel Rotar appeal pro se the district court’s dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that a Deputy District Attorney and a Superior Court Judge violated their constitutional rights by prosecuting them on the basis of forged pleadings and manufactured evidence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. After de novo review, Guerrero v. Gates, 357 F.3d 911, 916 (9th Cir.2004), we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the Rotars’ action because their claims implicate the validity of their state-court convictions, and they have not proven that their convictions were reversed, expunged, or otherwise called into question. See Harvey v. Waldron, 210 F.3d 1008, 1013-14 (9th Cir.2000) (citing Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994)).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.