Case ID: ark_321/html/0496-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Douglas James CLAYTON v. STATE of Arkansas
    CR 94-1446
    902 S.W.2d 772
    Supreme Court of Arkansas
    Opinion delivered July 17, 1995
    
      Ralph M. Cloar, for appellant.
    No response.
   .

Per Curiam.

Appellant Douglas James Clayton petitions for rehearing on the basis that this court erred in dismissing his appeal on the basis that his notice of appeal was ineffective. See Clayton v. State, 321 Ark. 217, 900 S.W.2d 537 (1995). According to Clayton, we previously granted his motion for rule on the clerk, permitting him to lodge his transcript. See Clayton v. State, 319 Ark. 291, 890 S.W.2d 602 (1995) (Clayton I). We agree that we erred in dismissing the appeal, and we direct the Clerk of the Supreme Court to reinstate the appeal.