Case ID: so2d_159/html/0244-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HOME DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF ST. PETERSBURG, Inc., and Roy J. Deeb and Marilyn K. Deeb, his wife, Appellants, v. Rudolph BURSANI and Lillian Bursani, individually and as husband and wife, Appellees.
    No. 3865.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
    Dec. 18, 1963.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 17, 1964.
    Hugh E. Reams (of Kiernan & Reams), St. Petersburg, and Goldner, Carney & Marger, St. Petersburg, fo.r appellants.
    Gardner W. Beckett, Jr. (of Askew & Beckett), St. Petersburg, for' appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

This appeal brings for review a final decree based upon findings of fact and recommendations of a Special Master. In view of the presumption of validity which attaches and with no showing of abuse of discretion or other error, the decree is

Affirmed.

KANNER, Acting C. J., WHITE, J., and McMULLEN, NEIL C., Associate Judge, concur.