Case ID: f-appx_115/html/0178-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David MCKEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARLINGTON COUNTY; Beth Arthur, Chief Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 04-7133.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 30, 2004.
    Decided: Dec. 20, 2004.
    David McKee, Appellant pro se.
    Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

David McKee appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McKee v. Arlington County, No. CA-04-339 (E.D.Va. Aug. 2, 2004). We deny McKee’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED