Case ID: f-appx_184/html/0626-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alejandro VIAZ-CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 04-30020.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 8, 2006.
    
    Filed June 9, 2006.
    Pamela J. Byerly, AUSA, USSP-Offiee of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Stephen R. Hormel, Esq., FPDWAFederal Public Defender’s Office (Eastern WA & ID), Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: TALLMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and HUFF, District Judge.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
    
      
       The Honorable Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.
    
   ORDER

The joint motion for remand is GRANTED. The sentence for Alejandro ViazCruz is VACATED, and his case is REMANDED for resentencing.

MOTION GRANTED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by the Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.