Case ID: nh_93/html/0335-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hillsborough,
    Mar. 6, 1945.
    No. 3518.
    Joseph Anthony Skavina v. Janet Skavina.
    
      Chretien & Craig (Mr. Chretien orally), for the plaintiff.
    
      Arthur B. Hayden and Osgood & Osgood (Mr. Hayden orally), for the defendant.
   Per Curiam.

The petition alleges sufficient grounds for annulment. However, we deem it inexpedient to consider at this time the numerous allegations of fraud, some of which may not be sustained by the evidence. The contention that the plaintiff does not come into equity with “clean hands” is not conclusive. See 16 Minn. Law Rev. 215.

Exception sustained.

Branch, J., was absent.