Case ID: f-appx_117/html/0267-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Curlee SHERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BILO, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 04-1826.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 19, 2004.
    Decided Dec. 22, 2004.
    Curlee Sherman, Appellant pro se.
    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      Affirmed by unpublished PER .CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM.

Curlee Sherman appeals the magistrate judge’s order dismissing his complaint pursuant to a pre-filing review order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm the magistrate judge’s application of the pre-filing review order. See Sherman v. Bilo, Inc., No. CA-04-1882-5 (D.S.C. filed June 15, 2004; entered June 22, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED 
      
       We agree with the district court that Sherman has a history of filing frivolous cases, many of which resulted in meritless appeals. If Sherman continues this conduct, which wastes judicial resources, this court will consider ordering sanctions and a pre-filing injunction.