Case ID: sw2d_742/html/0629-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re the Marriage of Dianne Marie BOHNERT, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Clarence Edward BOHNERT, Respondent-Appellant.
    No. 52615.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Jan. 12, 1988.
    David B. Lacks, Kris R. Baumgartner, St. Louis, for respondent-appellant.
    Herbert A. Kasten, Jr., Ste. Genevieve, for petitioner-respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Husband appeals from the portions of a dissolution decree that distributed the marital property and awarded maintenance to wife. Wife contends, with some justification, that husband’s points relied on do not comply with Rule 84.04(d). Nevertheless, we have reviewed the merits of husband's contentions in light of the standards set forth in Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976), and conclude from the record that the distribution of marital property and the award of maintenance are supported by substantial evidence. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).