Case ID: f-appx_55/html/0843-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Juan Manuel DIAZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
    No. 01-70961.
    INS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Jan. 17, 2003.
    Decided Feb. 6, 2003.
    Before FRIEDMAN, KOZINSKI and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The Honorable Daniel M. Friedman, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

We have jurisdiction to review the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of a motion to reopen. See Rodriguez-Lariz v. INS, 282 F.3d 1218, 1223 (9th Cir.2002). The BIA properly denied Juan Manuel Diaz’s motion, which raised the same insufficient factors of economic hardship, reduction in standard of living, and lack of educational opportunities previously rejected by the BIA. See Agyeman v. INS, 296 F.3d 871, 890, n. 2 (9th Cir.2002); see also Ramirez-Durazo v. INS, 794 F.2d 491, 498 (9th Cir.1986). The BIA therefore did not violate Diaz’s due process rights. See Colmenar v. INS, 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000).

PETITION DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.