Case ID: f-appx_301/html/0230-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malcolm Eugene GOLSON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08-7229.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 13, 2008.
    Decided: Nov. 21, 2008.
    Malcolm Eugene Golson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    
      Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Malcolm Eugene Golson appeals a district court order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Golson, No. 2:01-cr-00047-RGD (E.D. Va. June 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.