Case ID: njl_116/html/0410-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

EDWARD KELLY, RESPONDENT, v. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT.
    Argued February 7, 1936 —
    Decided May 14, 1936.
    For the respondent, Quinn, Parsons & Doremus.
    
    For the appellant, William F. Hanlon.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam, in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.