Case ID: so2d_165/html/0756-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ercel Lee VAN HOOSE, Petitioner, v. GRAHAM’S DAIRY, INC., et al., Respondents.
    No. 33369.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    June 26, 1964.
    Dan G. Wheeler, Jr., and Loring P. Evans, Jr., Miami, for petitioner.
    Fowler White, Gillen, Humkey & Tre-nam, Miami, for Graham’s Dairy Inc.; Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date January 31, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.