Case ID: f-appx_120/html/0465-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sophal LUY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT; Kevin Clark, Police Commissioner; Barbara Magnass, Lieutenant, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 04-1994.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 27, 2005.
    Decided: Feb. 1, 2005.
    Sophal Luy, Appellant pro se.
    Kim Yvette Johnson, Baltimore City Police Department, Baltimore, Maryland; William Rowe Phelan, Jr., City of Baltimore Law Department, Baltimore, Maryland; Neal Marcellas Janey, Sr., The Janey Law Firm, PC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Sophal Luy appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action against the Baltimore Police Department, Police Commissioner Kevin Clark, and Lieutenant Barbara Magnass. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Luy v. Baltimore Police Dep’t, No. CA-03-2833CCB (D. Md. July 16, 2004; July 29, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED