Case ID: f-appx_64/html/0408-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Darryl ALLMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALEXANDRIA SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; Edward J. Prokop, Chief Deputy; John Kapetanis, Sergeant; George Gray, Deputy; Darren Hinzman, Deputy, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 03-1172.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted May 29, 2003.
    Decided June 3, 2003.
    Darryl Allmond, Appellant pro se. Christina Kearney Saba, Shuford, Rubin & Gibney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM:

Darryl Allmond appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Allmond v. Alexandria Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. CA-02-309-A (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 22, 2003 & entered Jan. 23, 2003; Jan. 29, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.