Case ID: sw2d_801/html/0798-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eileen Renee HENKE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Raymond Carl HENKE, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. 58170.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Jan. 15, 1991.
    Margaret E. Gangle, Rock Hill, for plaintiff/appellant.
    Michael P. Shea, St. Charles, for defendant/respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this action for back child support, defendant’s summary judgment motion was sustained.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).