Case ID: so2d_356/html/1326-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DAUKSCH, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re the ESTATE of Grace ZALOUDEK, Deceased.
    No. 77-1606.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    April 4, 1978.
    Robert M. Curtis, of Saunders, Curtis, Ginestra & Gore, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
    John V. Russell, Fort Lauderdale, for ap-pellee-Richard M. Sauls.
    Robert A. Ware, of English, McCaughan & O’Bryan, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee-Landmark First Nat. Bank of Fort Lauder-dale.
   DAUKSCH, Judge.

Appellants bring for our review an order of the trial court which quashed a subpoena duces tecum. They have designated their appeal as being an interlocutory appeal and we recognize it as such. We derive our authority for interlocutory review from Fla. App. Rule 4.2. In this probate matter Fla. Probate and Guardianship Rule 5.100 also defines the right of appeal. In neither rule does a party have the right to interlocutory appeal from a non-final order in a probate action. In re Estate of Baker, 327 So.2d 205 (Fla.1976); Tyler v. Huggins, 175 So.2d 239 (Fla. 2 DCA 1965); In re Estate of Leterman, 238 So.2d 695 (Fla. 3 DCA 1970); Johnson v. General Motors Corp., 350 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 4 DCA 1977).

Appeal DISMISSED.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and MOORE, J., concur.