Case ID: njl_90/html/0348-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ELIZABETH WHITTINGHAM, APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF MILLBURN ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Argued November 29, 1916
    Decided December 5, 1916.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court.
    For the appellant, Cortlandt & Wayne Parker and John O. Bigelow.
    
    For the respondent township of Millburn, Jerome T. Congleton.
    
    For the respondent Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Walter. J. Larranee.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam in Whittingham v. Township of Millburn et al., No. 125, present term of this court, ante p. 344.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Garrison, Trenci-iard, Black, White, Heppeniieimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 9.

For reversal—Parker, Bergen, JJ. 2.