Case ID: so2d_616/html/0196-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Julian WILLFORD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-1337.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 13, 1993.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Kelley S. Roark, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Consuelo Maingot and Francine Thomas, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.
    Before HUBBART, BASKIN and LEVY, JJ. .
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Cotton, 595 So.2d 957 (Fla.1992) (approving Cotton v. State, 588 So.2d 694 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)); Burdick v. State, 594 So.2d 267 (Fla.1992). Compare Tucker v. State, 595 So.2d 956 (Fla.1992) (resentencing required where trial court did not indicate understanding that life sentence under § 775.084(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991), was permissive, not mandatory); Henry v. State, 581 So.2d 928 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (same).