Case ID: ohio-st-3d_39/html/0349-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Douglas, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Horn, Appellant, v. Mayfield, Admr.; Inland Division, GMC, Appellee, et al.
    [Cite as Horn v. Mayfield (1988), 39 Ohio St. 3d 349.]
    (No. 88-435
    — Submitted September 21, 1988 —
    Decided November 23, 1988.)
    
      
      E. S. Gallon & Associates and Deborah J. Adler, for appellant.
    
      Smith & Schnacke Co., L.P.A., and Thomas P. Whelley II, for appellee.
    
      Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Stewart R. Jaffy, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio AFL-CIO.
   The judgment of the court of appeals is hereby affirmed on authority of Clementi v. Wean United, Inc. (1988), 39 Ohio St. 3d 342, 530 N.E. 2d 909.

Moyer, C.J., Locher, Holmes, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Sweeney and Douglas, JJ., dissent.

Douglas, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent. For the reasons stated in my dissent in Clementi v. Wean United, Inc. (1988), 39 Ohio St. 3d 342, 530 N.E. 2d 909, this case should be reversed on the authority of Dent v. AT&T Technologies (1988), 38 Ohio St. 3d 187, 527 N.E. 2d 821. It appears to me that this case and Dent are inapposite to Clementi — but then I readily admit that I do not understand Clementi.

Sweeney, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.