Case ID: sw3d_564/html/0402-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Pierre T. PIPES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 106328
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    Filed: December 26, 2018
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Kristina S. Olson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
    ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Julia E. Neidhardt, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.
    Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Pierre Pipes appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).