Case ID: ny_201/html/0527-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Emil J. Wesp, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Rose Shoe Manufacturing Company, Respondent, v. Robert J. Strasenburgh, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
    
      Wesp v. Muckle, 136 App. Div. 241, affirmed.
    (Argued January 26, 1911;
    decided February 14, 1911.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered February 3, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover the amount of certain dividends alleged to have been wrongfully declared by the defendants as directors of the Rose Shoe Manufacturing Company.
    
      John A. Barhite for appellant.
    
      Isaac Adler for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Cli. J., G-ray, Haight, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Absent: Vann, J.