Case ID: ga-app_30/html/0122-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

14209.
    Moore v. Reville.
    Decided April 10, 1923.
    Foreclosure of mortgage; from Biebmond superior court — Judge Henry C. Hammond. December 16, 1922.
    
      Isaac 8. Beetles, for plaintiff in error.
    
      William II. Fleming, contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

The general grounds of the motion for a new trial are expressly abandoned in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error; and the excerpt from the charge of the court, complained of in the only special ground of the motion, when considered in the light of the entire charge and the particular facts of the case, does not require a new trial. ■ Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Blbodworth, JJ., concur.'