Case ID: so2d_195/html/0256-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Samuel Junior THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 7378.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
    Feb. 22, 1967.
    Joseph G. Spicola, Jr., Public Defender, and Delano S. Stewart, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant,
    Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed under the authority of Carroll v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 266; Taylor v. State, Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 402; and Dozier v. State, Fla.App. 1966, 192 So. 2d 506, opinion filed December 7, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

SHANNON, Acting C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ., concur.