Case ID: or-app_126/html/0265-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Submitted on record and briefs December 23, 1993,
    affirmed February 2, 1994
    ERIC MICHAEL AKERS, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent.
    
    (CA A68021)
    866 P2d 527
    Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Lawrence J. Hall, Deputy Public Defender, filed the brief for petitioner.
    Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Harrison Latto, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
    Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds, Judge, and Durham, Judge pro tempore.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision that imposed as a condition of parole that he not have contact with a particular person. He asserts that there is not substantial evidence to support imposition of the condition. We have reviewed the record, including evidence not disclosed to petitioner, and conclude that there is evidence justifying the imposition of the condition. He also challenges the refusal of the Board to disclose to him a letter it considered in imposing the condition. The withholding of the letter was not error. Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331, 862 P2d 1312 (1993).

Affirmed.