Case ID: nys_35/html/1108-08.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "McCarthy, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HAMMOND, Respondent, v. VAN SCHAICK, Appellant.
    (City Court of New York, General Term.
    October 29, 1895.)
    Action by Charles L. Hammond against Eugene Van Schaick.
    Cantor & Van Schaick, for appellant. Lamb, Osborn & Petty, for respondent.
   McCarthy, J.

This case involved a question of fact, and was correctly submitted to the jury on the law. We find no error, and judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.