Case ID: sw3d_63/html/0680-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Johnny SMITH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 79354.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Dec. 26, 2001.
    Mark A. Grothoff, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Johnny Smith, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. The court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum for them information only setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).