Case ID: ny-2d_27/html/0658-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Susan Goldshein et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. Ronald J. D’Angelo et al., Respondents, and Thomas P. McInerney et al., Appellants-Respondents.
    Argued June 15, 1970;
    decided June 16, 1970.
    
      
      Salvatore D’Ambrosio and Robert B. Brady for appellants-respondents and respondents.
    
      Albert J. Millus for respondents-appellants.
   Order modified, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed: We agree with the dissenters at the Appellate Division that there was insufficient evidence to support a determination that respondents McInerney, Delloso and Sedano were “not in sympathy with the principles of [the Republican] party” (Election Law, § 332, subd. 2). The proof that they were aided in their candidacies by members and leaders of the Conservative Party in the circulation of their petitions and otherwise falls far short of establishing petitioners’ claim. The order should be modified by reversing as to said respondents and dismissing the petition as to them.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.