Case ID: f-appx_334/html/0548-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Akeem Labeeb AL-MUWWAKKIL, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 09-7425.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 15, 2009.
    Decided: Oct. 22, 2009.
    Akeem Labeeb Al-Muwwakkil, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Woodrow Hoffman, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Akeem Labeeb Al-Muwwakkil appeals the district court’s order denying his Rule 60(b) motion of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in which Al-Muwwakkil attempted to revisit an order issued during his criminal trial denying a motion to suppress. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Al-Muwwakkil, No. 4:01-cr-00092-RGD-1 (E.D.Va. July 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.