Case ID: nj-eq_99/html/0449-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

W. Howard Bronsdon, respondent, v. William F. Shupe, appellant.
    [Decided February 1st, 1926.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Griffin, whose opinion is reported in 98 N. J. Eq. 67.
    
    
      Mr. Lichtenstein & Lichtenstein, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. Harry Augenbliclc, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchaed, Pakkee, Mintubn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gaednee, Van Buskibk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.