Case ID: ga_165/html/0650-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cannon v. Plunkett, sheriff. Floyd v. Plunkett, sheriff.
    These eases being for decision by a full bench of six Justices, who are evenly divided in opinion, Russell, C. J., and Atkinson and Hill, JJ., being in favor of a reversal, and Beck, P. J., and Gilbert and Hines, JJ., being in favor of an affirmance, the judgments of the trial court stand affirmed by operation of law.
    Appeal and Error, 4 C. J. p. 1122, n. 35.
    Nos. 5820, 5824.
    November 18, 1927.
    Rehearing denied March 3, 1928.
    Petitions for injunction. Before Judge Franklin. Richmond superior court. December 18, 1926.
    
      Peebles & Bowden, for plaintiffs.
    
      W. Inman Gurry, solicitor, and George Earns, solicitor-general, for defendant.