Case ID: ga-app_35/html/0205-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Beoyxes, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

17020.
    Davis v. The State.
    Criminal Law, 17 C. J. p. 271, n. 41.
    Decided March 3, 1926.
    Embezzlement; from Grady superior court—Judge Custer. October 29, 1925.
    
      J. A. Pope, S. P. Cain, for plaintiff in error.
    
      B. C. Gardner, solicitor-general, Ira Carlisle, contra.
   Beoyxes, C. J.

The amendment to the motion for a new trial is merely an elaboration of the general grounds'; the verdiet is authorized by the evidence; and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere. . .

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Blood/worth, JJ., oonour.