Case ID: so2d_740/html/0015-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Noah BOLDON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 98-3341.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    March 23, 1999.
    Noah Boldon, pro se, petitioner.
    
      Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

Noah Boldon petitions this court for a writ of mandamus, complaining of the trial court’s failure to rule on his motion to withdraw his plea. However, it appears that the motion was made at a time when petitioner was represented by counsel in the trial court and therefore the trial judge was within his discretion to treat the motion as a nullity and disregard it. Smith v. State, 444 So.2d 542, 547 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ„ concur.