Case ID: ad3d_13/html/0100-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Christopher E. DiPasquale, Appellant, v Security Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York et al., Respondents.
    [785 NYS2d 335]
   Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered October 6, 2003, which denied plaintiffs motion to vacate his default on an earlier dismissal motion for failure to state a cause of action, and to grant leave to amend his complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In order to vacate a default, a plaintiff must offer a reasonable excuse for the default and demonstrate merit to the complaint. Amendment of a complaint may be denied, in the exercise of discretion, where the proposed amended cause is also without merit (Ava & Co. v Olympic Tower Assoc., 259 AD2d 315, 316 [1999]). The original complaint was clearly without merit, and the proposed amended complaint sought to reinstate a claim that the court had already dismissed on the merits. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.