Case ID: f-appx_668/html/0515-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Duvall HUCKS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-6289
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: September 7, 2016
    Decided: September 14, 2016
    Duvall Hucks, Appellant Pro Se. Debra Lynn Dwyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Duvall Hucks appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hucks, No. 8:95-cr-00267-AW-7 (D. Md. Feb. 2, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court.and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED