Case ID: sw3d_556/html/0125-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dorothy RISSELL, Appellant, v. Michael RISSELL, Respondent.
    No. ED 106199
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    Filed: September 4, 2018
    FOR APPELLANTS: Susan Kreher Roach, 8000 Maryland Avenue, Suite 760, Clayton, Missouri 63105.
    FOR RESPONDENTS: Deborah C.M. Henry, 130 South Bemiston Avenue, Suite 200, St. Louis, Missouri 63105.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM

Dorothy Rissell appeals the trial court's modification judgment that reduced her former husband Michael Rissell's maintenance. Ms. Rissell contends that the judgment was entered against the weight of the evidence, which she asserts showed that Mr. Rissell failed to demonstrate a substantial and continuing change in circumstances. She also argues that the trial court erred by denying without an evidentiary hearing her motion to reopen the evidence.

We affirm. Because an extended opinion would have no precedential value, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).