Case ID: so2d_595/html/0584-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carlos Edward APONTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 91-01151.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 25, 1992.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and John S. Lynch, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Stephen A. Baker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The only point raised in this appeal challenges the validity of conditions 6, 9, 10, 18 and 19 which were imposed in the written order of probation. We strike these special conditions of probation because they did not conform to the oral pronouncement of sentence imposed at the sentencing hearing. Labar v. State, 584 So.2d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

Affirmed, except remanded for conformance of the sentence to the oral pronouncement.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.