Case ID: f2d_4/html/0287-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "ROBB, Associate Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Howard Earl HOOVER, Appellant, v. James B. KIRBY and Daniel B. REPLOGLE, Appellees.
    (Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
    Submitted January 15, 1925.
    Decided February 2, 1925.)
    No. 1712.
    Donald M. Carter, of Chicago, 111., and J. S. Barker, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
    D. B. Replogle, of Berkeley, Cal., for appellees.
    Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, ROBB, Associate Justice, and BARBER, Judge of the United States Court of Customs Appeals.
   ROBB, Associate Justice.

This interference involves substantially the same question determined in the preceding interference, No. 1711, 4 F.(2d) 287, just decided, and was so considered by the Patent Office. For the reasons stated in the other decision, we affirm the decision here.

Affirmed.

Petition for rehearing denied February 21,1925.