Case ID: so2d_599/html/0785-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jonathan INGRAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 91-0948.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    June 24, 1992.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Mallorye Cunningham, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We find no error as to appellant’s point I and we affirm appellant’s sentence. As to appellant’s point II, we do not consider his constitutional attack on Chapter 89-280, Laws of Florida, because appellant would have been found to be an habitual felony offender under the pre-amended statute as well. Wright v. State, 579 So.2d 418 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

AFFIRMED.

STONE, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.