Case ID: f2d_103/html/1018-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Arthur PINOVER v. The BALTIMORE PURE RYE DISTILLING CO., a Corporation.
    No. 9154.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    May 8, 1939.
    McFarland, Scheinman & Sisenwein, and David Blonder, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
    Baldwin Robertson, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
    Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of motion of appellee for dismissal of the appeal herein for failure of appellant to make deposit covering estimated expense of printing the transcript, there being no opposition to said motion by appellant, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered said motion granted, that a decree be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.