Case ID: f-appx_214/html/0287-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

USRP (GANT 1), LLC; USRP (Gant 2), LLC, Plaintiffs—Appellees, v. Billy Wayne LANGSTON, Jr., d/b/a Pit & Pump Tanks & Equipment, Incorporated, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 06-1528.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 30, 2006.
    Decided: Jan. 17, 2007.
    Billy Wayne Langston, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard C. Gaskins, Jr., Michael T. Champion, Moore & Van Allen, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Billy Wayne Langston, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of USRP (Gant 1), LLC, and USRP (Gant 2), LLC (“USRP”) on USRP’s complaint seeking damages for environmental remediation costs. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See USRP v. Langston, No. 4:04-cv00143-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 13, 2006). Additionally, we deny Langston’s pending motion to strike USRP’s informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.