Case ID: so2d_454/html/0680-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Juan ECHEVARRIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 83-582, 83-583.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 31, 1984.
    Rehearing Denied Sept. 10, 1984.
    Hutner & Abramson and Stuart Abram-son, Coral Gables, and Bennet Lapidus, Miami, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Having carefully considered the record in this consolidated criminal appeal, the briefs, and the arguments of counsel, we conclude that the errors raised as issues on appeal are either harmless errors, United States v. Hastings, 461 U.S. 499, 103 S.Ct. 1974, 76 L.Ed.2d 96 (1983); Drake v. State, 441 So.2d 1079 (Fla.1983); Palmes v. State, 397 So.2d 648 (Fla.1981), or were not preserved for appellate review by contemporaneous objection below. Sims v. State, 444 So.2d 922 (Fla.1983); Wilson v. State, 436 So.2d 908 (Fla.1983); Steinhorst v. State, 412 So.2d 332 (Fla.1982).

Affirmed.