Case ID: so2d_567/html/0062-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alexander GUERRA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 90-698.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 9, 1990.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and N. Joseph Durant, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Jacqueline M. Valdespino, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The state correctly concedes that a written order of probation revocation must conform with the court’s oral pronouncements. Salmon v. State, 540 So.2d 922 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Williams v. State, 525 So.2d 458 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). We therefore remand for the entry of a corrected order of probation revocation to conform with the trial court’s oral pronouncement at the probation revocation hearing; defendant’s probation is revoked solely because he failed to report and perform community service hours required as a condition of probation. Revocation based on the defendant’s commission of four burglaries and thefts should be stricken from the probation revocation order.