Case ID: f-appx_670/html/0089-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles A. TREECE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carolyn W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 16-1394
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: September 30, 2016
    Decided: October 25, 2016
    Charles A. Treece, Appellant Pro Se. Maya DiDomenico, Assistant Regional Counsel, Antonia Maria Pfeffer, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Social Security Administration, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles A. Treece appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to affirm the Commissioner’s suspension of Treece’s old-age insurance benefits. Our review of the Commissioner’s determination is limited to evaluating whether the findings are supported by substantial evidence and whether the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2012); Johnson v. Barnhart, 434 F.3d 650, 653 (4th Cir. 2005).

We'have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Treece v. Colvin, No. 1:14-cv-01077-NCT-LPA, 2016 WL 1181704 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED