Case ID: nw2d_787/html/0540-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "/s/Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eric M. MADSON, Respondent, v. MINNEAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, City of Minneapolis, Self-Insured, Relator.
    No. A10-897.
    Supreme Court of Minnesota.
    Aug. 25, 2010.
    Mark F. Gaughan, Caroline Bell Beck-man, Erickson, Bell, Beckman & Quinn, P.Á., Roseville, MN, for respondent.
    Thomas J. Miller, Minneapolis City Attorney’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, for relator.
   ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed April 20, 2010, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice