Case ID: br_457/html/0272-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re: Stephen Charles SIEBER, Debtor. Stephen Charles Sieber, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cheryl E. Rose, Trustee—Appellee.
    No. 10-2341.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 26, 2011.
    Decided: May 31, 2011.
    Stephen Charles Sieber, Appellant Pro Se. James Martin Hoffman, Offit Kur-man, PA, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appel-lee.
    Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
   Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Charles Sieber seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying him permission to file documents in his bankruptcy appeal under the electronic filing system. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1523 (1949). The order Sieber seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.