Case ID: p3d_415/html/1153-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Barry ADAMSON, Petitioner, v. BUREAU OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Respondent.
    A165559
    Court of Appeals of Oregon.
    Submitted February 2, 2018. April 18, 2018
    Barry Adamson filed the briefs pro se.
    Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and
    Carson L. Whitehead, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
    Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Garrett, Judge, and Powers, Judge.
   PER CURIAM

Under ORS 183.400, petitioner seeks a judicial determination of the validity of four administrative rules adopted by the Bureau of Labor and Industries, arguing that OAR 839-005-0005, OAR 839-005-0010, OAR 839-005-0205, and OAR 839-005-0206 are unconstitutionally overbroad under the free exercise clauses in Article I, sections 2 and 3, of the Oregon Constitution. Having reviewed petitioner's arguments, we conclude that the rules challenged by him are valid.

OAR 839-005-0005, OAR 839-005-0010, OAR 839-005-0205, and OAR 839-005-0206 held valid.