Case ID: sw3d_398/html/0527-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GERSHENSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. LEDCOR CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellant/Cross-Respondent, and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, THF Telegraph Parcel W Development, L.P., and THF Telegraph Parcel W, Inc., Cross-Respondents.
    No. ED 98220.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Feb. 19, 2013.
    Application for Transfer Denied May 28, 2013.
    Steven M. Cockriel, Cockriel & Chris-tofferson LLC, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant/Cross-Respondent, Ledcor Construction, Inc. and for Cross-Respondent Walmart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, THF Telegraph Parcel W Development, L.P., and THF Telegraph Parcel W, Inc.
    Jason Woodrow Kinser, Behr, McCarter & Potter, P.C., Clayton, MO, for Respondent/Cross-Appellant Gershenson Construction Company, Inc.
    Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and LISA VAN AMBURG, J.
    
      
      . Cross-Respondents are not involved in this appeal.
    
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ledcor Construction, Inc., (Ledcor) appeals from the trial court’s entry of an amended judgment in favor of Gershenson Construction Company, Inc., (Gershenson) on Gershenson’s petition alleging breach of contract and foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien, and on Gershenson’s claim for attorneys’ fees, expert witness fees, and costs. Gershenson cross-appeals with regard to the trial court’s entry of judgment in favor of Ledcor on the counts in Gershenson’s petition alleging quantum meruit, rescission and abandonment, and violation of the retainage act. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).