Case ID: f-appx_85/html/0598-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joel Heredia NARANJO, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Ernest ROE, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
    No. 02-56757.
    D.C. No. CV-02-00068-GLT.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Dec. 2, 2003.
    Decided Jan. 12, 2004.
    Joel Heredia Naranjo, pro se, Corcoran, CA, Phillip I. Bronson, Encino, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
    Michael C. Keller, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
    Before KOZINSKI, NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge.
    
      
      The Honorable William W Schwarzer, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
    
   ORDER

This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because petitioner Joel Heredia Naranjo failed to file a timely notice of appeal and the district court found that Naranjo does not qualify for reopening of time under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). The mandate issued on January 2, 2004 is hereby withdrawn.

DISMISSED 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.