Case ID: nys_80/html/1136-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. VAN BRUNT, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

GOLDBERG, Respondent, v. LONDON et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
    February 20, 1903.)
    Action by Harris Goldberg against Reuben London and another. From an order amending plaintiff’s summons herein, defendants appeal. Modified. O. C. Bernheimer, for appellants. A. H. Sarasobn, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from should be modified by striking out the provision awarding costs to the plaintiff, and granting the motion upon the payment of $10 costs by the plaintiff to the defendants, and as thus modified affirmed, with costs to the appellants.

VAN BRUNT, P. J.

I dissent. I think that the order appealed from should be reversed on the ground that the court could never acquire jurisdiction by the service of a summons of the character of the one in the case at bar, notwithstanding the decisions to the contrary.