Case ID: f-appx_300/html/0235-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Brooks James TERRELL, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 07-7223.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 23, 2008.
    Decided: Nov. 17, 2008.
    
      Brooks James Terrell, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Brooks James Terrell appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Terrell, No. 7:99-cr-00610-HMH, 2007 WL 1795792 (D.S.C. June 19, 2007). We further deny Terrell’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Terrell filed a notice of appeal outside of the appeal period, and we remanded to the district court to determine whether Terrell demonstrated excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the appeal period. See United States v. Terrell, 266 Fed.Appx. 225 (4th Cir.2008). The district court found Terrell demonstrated excusable neglect or good cause; accordingly, we review the appeal on the merits.