Case ID: so3d_156/html/1037-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES—REPORT NO. 2014-03.
    No. SC14-465.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Jan. 29, 2015.
    Jerri Lynn Collins, Chair, Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases, Sanford, FL; Joseph Anthony Bulone, Past Chair, Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases, Clear-water, FL; and Bart Neil Schneider, Staff Liaison, Office of the State Courts Administrator, Tallahassee, FL, for Petitioner.
   PER CURIAM.

The Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases (Committee) has submitted a report proposing changes to the standard criminal jury instructions and asks the Court to authorize the amended standard instructions for publication and use. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

The Committee proposes changes to the following six standard criminal jury instructions: (1) 11.1, Sexual Battery — Victim Less Than 12 Years of Age; (2) 11.2, Sexual Battery — Victim 12 Years of Age or Older — Great Force; (3) 11.3, Sexual Battery — Victim 12 Years of Age or Older— Specified Circumstances; (4) 11.4, Sexual Battery-Person 12 Years of Age or Older; (5) 11.5, Solicitation of Child Under 18 Years of Age to Engage in an Act that Constitutes Sexual Battery by Person in Familial or Custodial Authority; and (6) 11.6, Sexual Battery Upon Child 12 Years of Age or Older but Under 18 Years of Age by Person in Familial or Custodial Authority.

The Committee previously proposed amendments to Criminal Jury Instruction 11.1. The Court declined to authorize the proposed changes due to a lack of supporting legal authority for certain proposed changes and a perceived logical inconsistency in the table of lesser-included offenses. See In re Std. Jury Instrs. in Crim. Cases—Report No. 2012-05, 131 So.3d 755, 756 (Fla.2013). We asked the Committee to reconsider its proposal. The current report provides the legal support previously found lacking and clarifies the Committee’s reasoning with respect to the table of lesser-included offenses. After the Committee’s report was filed with the Court, the proposed changes were published in The Florida Bar News and comments were solicited. No comments were filed.

In reconsidering its proposed changes to instruction 11.1, the Committee discovered additional issues affecting not only instruction 11.1 but also instructions 11.2-11.6. All six instructions are amended in order to include all the possible ways the various offenses can be committed based on the statutory language defining the offenses. Other changes are made to conform the instructions and notes to the statutory language and caselaw. Obsolete notes and comments are deleted from the instructions. The tables of lesser-included offenses are revised for technical correctness and consistency.

Upon consideration of the Committee’s report, we authorize the amended instructions, as set forth in the appendix to this opinion, for publication and use. New language is indicated by underlining, and deleted language is indicated by struck-through type.

In authorizing the publication and use of these instructions, we express no opinion on their correctness and remind all interested parties that this authorization forecloses neither requesting additional or alternative instructions nor contesting the legal correctness of the instructions. We further caution all interested parties that any comments associated with the instructions reflect only the opinion of the Committee and are not necessarily indicative of the views of this Court as to their correctness or applicability. The instructions as set forth in the appendix shall be effective when this opinion becomes final.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

11.1 SEXUAL BATTERY—VICTIM LESS THAN 12 YEARS OF AGE

§ 794.011(2), Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of Sexual Battery upon a Person Less Than 12 Years of Age, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Victim) was less than 12 years of age.
Give 2a, 2b, 2c, or 2d as applicable.
2. a. (Defendant) committed an act [upon] [with] (victim) in which the sexual organ of the [ (defendant) ] [ (victim) ] penetrated or had union with the [anus] [vagina] [mouth] of the [ (victim) ] [ (defendant) ].
b. (Defendant) committed an act [upon] [with] (victim) in which the [anus] [vagina] of [ (victim) ] [ (defendant) ] was penetrated by an object.
c. (Defendant) injured the sexual organ of (victim) in an attempt to commit an act [upon] [with] (victim) in which the sexual organ of the [ (defendant) ] [ (victim) ] would have penetrated or would have had union with the [anus] [vagina] [mouth] of the [ (victim) ] [ (defendant) ].
d. (Defendant) injured the sexual organ of (victim) in an attempt to commit an act upon (victim) in which the [anus] [vagina] of (victim) would be penetrated by an object.
Give 3a or 3b as applicable.
3.a. (Defendant) was 18 years of age or older at the time of the sexual battery.
b. (Defendant) was less than 18 years of age at the time of the sexual battery.
Give if applicable.

However, any act done for bona fide medical purposes is not a sexual battery.

Definition. Give if applicable.

“Union” means contact.

Give if requested. Khianthalat v. State, 974 So.2d 359 (Fla.2008).

Consent of (victim) is not a defense to the crime charged.

Give if requested. § 794-022, Fla. Stat.

(Victim’s) lack of chastity is not a defense to the crime charged.

§ 794.021, Fla. Stat.

Ignorance of (victim’s) age, (victim’s) misrepresentation of his or her age, or a defendant’s bona fide belief of (victim’s) age is not a defense to the crime charged.

dn-the-event-that-m/idUple-perpetrators is-eharged-andproven-give-instruction on enhancement?

§ 794.023, Fla. Stat.

The option■■■ of-the word ‘‘[with] (victim) in-2a — and-2e—is—provided—io-reflect-the manner in which the crime was committed. See Coleman v. State, 484 So.2d 624 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), at pages 627, 628.

Lesser-Included Offenses

Comment

This instruction was adopted in 1981 and was amended in 1987 [508 So.2d 1221], 1995 [657 So.2d 1152], and 2007, by-adding 3(a)-and-3(b) pursuant to Glover v. State, [ 863 So.2d 236], (Fla.2003) and 2015.

11.2 SEXUAL BATTERY — VICTIM 12 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER — GREAT FORCE OR DEADLY WEAPON

§ 794.011(3), Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of Sexual Battery upon a Person 12 Years of Age or Older with the Use of [a Deadly Weapon] [or] [Physical Force Likely to Cause Serious Personal Injury], the State must prove the following four elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Victim) was 12 years of age or older.
2. a. [(Defendant) committed an act [upon] [with] (victim) in which the sexual organ of the [ (defendant) ] [ (victim) ] penetrated or had union with the [anus] [vagina] [mouth] of the [ (victim) ] [ (defendant) ].]
b. (Defendant) committed an act [upon] [with] (victim) in which the [anus] [vagina] of [ (victim) ] [ (defendant) ] was penetrated by an object.
3. (Defendant) in the process
a. [used or threatened to use a deadly weapon].
b. [used actual physical force likely to cause serious personal injury].
4. The act was done without the consent of (victim).
Definitions.
Give in all cases.

“Consent” means intelligent, knowing, and voluntary consent and does not include coerced submission. Consent does not mean the failure by the alleged victim to offer physical resistance to the offender.

Give if applicable.

Evidence of the victim’s mental incapacity or defect, if any, may be considered in determining whether there was an intelligent, knowing, and voluntary consent.

“Mentally incapacitated” means that a person is rendered temporarily incapable of appraising or controlling his or her conduct due to the influence of a narcotic, anesthetic, or intoxicating substance administered to that person without his or her consent, or due to any other act committed upon that person without his or her consent.

“Mentally defective” means that a person suffers from a mental disease or defect that renders that person temporarily or permanently incapable of appraising- the nature of his or her conduct.

“Union” means contact.

Give if 3a alleged.

A weapon is a “deadly weapon” if it is used or threatened to be used in a way likely to produce death or great bodily harm.

Give if 3b alleged.

“Serious personal injury” means great bodily harm or pain, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement.

Give if applicable.

However, any act done for bona fide medical purposes is not a sexual battery.

Give if requested. § 79j.022, Fla. Stat.

(Victim’s) lack of chastity is not a defense to the crime charged.

In the event that-multiple perpetrators is charged and proven^ give instruction on enhancement. § 79^.023, Fla. Stat.

¥-he-opüon-of the ivord “[with] (victim)” in-2a-is provided to reflect the manner in which — the- - crime was — committed¡—See Coleman v. State, 484 So.2d 624 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), at pages 627, 628.

Lesser-Included Offenses

Comment

This instruction was adopted in 1981 and was amended in 1987 [508 So.2d 1221], 1995 [657 So.2d 1152], 2003 [850 So.2d 1272], and 2008 [995 So.2d 476], and 2015.

11.3 SEXUAL BATTERY — VICTIM 12 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER-SPECIFIED CIRCUMSTANCES

§ 794.011(4), Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of Sexual Battery upon a Person 12 Years of Age or Older under Specified Circumstances, the State must prove the following four elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Victim) was 12 years of age or older.
2. a. [(Defendant) committed an act [upon] [with] (victim) in which the sexual organ of the [ (defendant) ] [ (victim) ] penetrated or had union with the [anus] [vagina] [mouth] of the [ (victim) ] [ (defendant) ].]
b. (Defendant) committed an act [upon] [with] (victim) in which the [anus] [vagina] of [ (victim) ] [ (defendant) ] was penetrated by an object.
3. a. [ (Victim) was physically helpless to resist.]
b. [ (Defendant) coerced (victim) to submit by threatening to use force or violence likely to cause serious personal injury and (victim) reasonably believed the (defendant) had the present ability to execute the threat.]
c. [ (Defendant) coerced (victim) to submit by threat of retaliation against (victim) or any other person and (victim) reasonably believed that (defendant) had the ability to execute the threat in the future.]
d. [ (Defendant), without prior knowledge or consent of (victim), administered or had knowledge of someone else administering to (victim) a narcotic, anesthetic, or other intoxicating substance that mentally or physically incapacitated (victim).]
e. [ (Victim) was mentally defective and (defendant) had reason to believe this or had actual knowledge of that fact.]
f. [ (Victim) was physically incapacitated.]
g. [ (Defendant) was at the time a[n] (insert official title or position) and was a[n] [certified [law enforcement officer] [correctional officer] [correctional probation officer]] [elected official exempt from certification] [person in a position of control or authority in a probation, community control, controlled release, detention, custodial, or similar setting] and the [officer] [official] [person] was acting in such a manner as to lead (victim) to reasonably believe that (defendant) was in a position of control or authority as an agent or employee of government.]
4. The act was committed without the consent of (victim).
Definitions.
Give in all cases.

“Consent” means intelligent, knowing, and voluntary consent and does not include coerced submission. Consent does not mean the failure by the alleged victim to offer physical resistance to the offender.

Give if applicable.

Evidence of the victim’s mental incapacity or defect, if any, may be considered in determining whether there was an intelligent, knowing, and voluntary consent.

“Mentally incapacitated” means that a person is rendered temporarily incapable of appraising or controlling his or her conduct due to the influence of a narcotic, anesthetic, or intoxicating substance administered to that person without his or her consent, or due to any other act committed upon that person without his or her consent.

“Mentally defective” means that a person suffers from a mental disease or defect that renders that person temporarily or permanently incapable of appraising the nature of his or her conduct.

“Union” means contact.

Give if 3a alleged.

“Physically helpless” means that a person is unconscious, asleep, or for any other reason physically unable to communicate unwillingness to act.

Give if 3b alleged.

“Serious personal injury” means great bodily harm or pain, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement.

Give if 3f alleged.

“Physically incapacitated” means that a person is bodily impaired or handicapped and substantially limited in his or her ability to resist or flee an act.

Give if applicable.

However, any act done for bona fide medical purposes is not a sexual battery.

Give if requested. § 791.022, Fla. Stat.

(Victim’s) lack of chastity is not a defense to the crime charged.

In the event that multiple perpetrators is charged and proven, give instruction cm, enhancement. § 791.023, Fla. Stat.

The option of the-word-“fwith] (victim)’’ in-2a~is-providedto reflect the manner in which.the.-crime was committed. — See Coleman v. State, 484 So.2d 624 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), at pages 627, 628.

Lesser-Included Offenses

Comments

Element 3g: See s. 943.10(1), (2), (3), (6), (7), (8), (9) for the definition of a law enforcement officer, correctional officer, or correctional probation officer who must be either certified pursuant to s. 943.1395 or an elected officer exempt from certification pursuant to s. 943.253.

This instruction was adopted in 1981 and was amended in 1987 [508 So.2d 1221], 1992 [603 So.2d 1175], 1995 [657 So.2d 1152], 2003 [850 So.2d 1272], and 2008 [995 So.2d 476], and 2015.

11.4 SEXUAL BATTERY — PERSON 12 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER

§ 794.011(5), Fla. — Stat.

To prove the crime of Sexual Battery upon a Person 12 Years of Age or Older, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Victim) was 12 years of age or older.
Give 2a or 2b as applicable.
2. a. [ (Defendant) committed an act [upon] [with] (victim) in which the sexual organ of the [ (defendant) ] [ (victim) ] penetrated or had union with the [anus] [vagina] [mouth] of the [ (victim) ] [ (defendant) ].]
b. (Defendant) committed an act [upon] [with] (victim) in which the [anus] [vagina] of [ (victim) ] [ (defendant) ] was penetrated by an object.
3. The act was committed without the consent of (victim).
Definitions
Give in all cases.

“Consent” means intelligent, knowing, and voluntary consent and does not include coerced submission. Consent does not mean the failure by the alleged victim to offer physical resistance to the offender.

Give if applicable.

Evidence of the victim’s mental incapacity or defect, if any, may be considered in determining whether there was an intelligent, knowing, and voluntary consent.

“Mentally incapacitated” means that a person is rendered temporarily incapable of appraising or controlling his or her conduct due to the influence of a narcotic, anesthetic, or intoxicating substance administered to that person without his or her consent, or due to any other act committed upon that person without his or her consent.

“Mentally defective” means that a person suffers from a mental disease or defect that renders that person temporarily or permanently incapable of appraising the nature of his or her conduct.

Give if applicable.

“Union” means contact.

Give if applicable.

However, any act done for bona fide medical purposes is not a sexual battery.

Give if requested. § 791.022, Fla. Stat.

(Victim’s) lack of chastity is not a defense to the crime charged.

In the event that multiple perpetrators is charged and proven, give instruction on enhancement. § 79Í.023, Fla. — Stat.

The option oftheioord “[with] (victim) - in 2a is provided-to reflect the manner-in ivhiGhr-tke crivie.ivas committed.— See Coleman v. State, 484 So.2d 624 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), at pages 627, 628.

Lesser-Included Offenses

Comment

This instruction was adopted in 1981 and was amended in 1987 [508 So.2d 1221], 1995 [657 So.2d 1152], and 2003 [850 So.2d 1272], and 2015.

11.5 SOLICITATION OF CHILD UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE TO ENGAGE IN AN ACT THAT CONSTITUTES SEXUAL BATTERY BY PERSON IN FAMILIAL OR CUSTODIAL AUTHORITY

§ 794.011(8)(a), Fla. — Stat.

To prove the crime of Solicitation of a Child to Engage in an Act that Constitutes Sexual Battery by a Person in Familial or Custodial Authority, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Victim) was less than 18 years of age.
2. (Defendant) stood in the position of familial or custodial authority with regard to (victim).
3. (Defendant) [commanded] [encouraged] [hired] [requested] [tried to induce] (victim) to engage in an act which constitutes sexual battery in which:
a. [the sexual organ of the [ (defendant) ] [ (victim) ] would penetrate or have union with the [anus] [vagina] [mouth] of the [ (victim) ] [ (defendant) ]].
b. [the [anus] [vagina] of [(victim) ] [ (defendant) ] would be penetrated by an object].

It is not necessary that a sexual battery actually take place for the crime to be completed.

§ 79⅛.011(8), Fla. Stat.

It is not a defense that (victim) was willing to engage in an act which constitutes sexual battery or consented to engage in such acts.

Give if applicable.

However, any act done for bona fide medical purposes is not a sexual battery.

Definition. Give if applicable.

“Union” means contact.

Give if requested. § 794..022, Fla. Stat.

(Victim’s) lack of chastity is not a defense to the crime charged.

§ 79Í.021, Fla. Stat.

Ignorance of (victim’s) age, (victim’s) misrepresentation of his or her age, or a defendant’s bona fide belief of (victim’s) age is not a defense to the crime charged.

Lesser Included Offenses

No lesser included offenses have been identified for this offense.

Comment

This instruction was adopted in 1987 [508 So.2d 1221] and was amended in 1995 [657 So.2d 1152], and 1997 [697 So.2d 84], and 2015.

11.6 SEXUAL BATTERY UPON CHILD 12 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER BUT UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE BY PERSON IN FAMILIAL OR CUSTODIAL AUTHORITY

§ 794.011(8)(b), Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of Sexual Battery Upon a Child by a Person in a Familial or Custodial Authority, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. (Victim) was 12 years of age or older but less than 18 years of age.
2. (Defendant) stood in the position of familial or custodial authority with regard to (victim).
3. (Defendant) committed an act [upon] [with] (victim) in which:
a. [the sexual organ of the [ (defendant) ] [ (victim) ] penetrated or had union with the [anus] [vagina] [mouth] of the [ (victim) ] [ (defendant) ]].
b. [the [anus] [vagina] of [(victim) ] [ (defendant) ] was penetrated by an object].
§ 791011(8), Fla. Stat.

It is not a defense that (victim) was willing to engage in acts which would constitute a sexual battery or consented to engage in such acts.

Give if applicable.

However, any act done for bona fide medical purposes is not a sexual battery.

Definition. Give if applicable.

“Union” means contact.

Give if requested. § 794-022, Fla. Stat.

(Victim’s) lack of chastity is not a defense to the crime charged.

79J/..021, Fla. Stat.

Ignorance of (victim’s) age, (victim’s) misrepresentation of his or her age, or a defendant’s bona fide belief of (victim’s) age is not a defense to the crime charged.

Lesser-Included Offenses

Comment

This instruction was adopted 1987 [508 So.2d 1221] and was amended in 1995 [657 So.2d 1152], 1997 [697 So.2d 84], and 2008 [995 So.2d 476], and 2015. 
      
      . The amendments as reflected in the appendix are to the Criminal Jury Instructions as they appear on the Court’s website at www. floridasupremecourt.org/jury_instructions/ instructions.shtml. We recognize that there may be minor discrepancies between the instructions as they appear on the website and the published versions of the instructions. Any discrepancies as to instructions authorized for publication and use after October 25, 2007, should be resolved by reference to the published opinion of this Court authorizing the instruction.