Case ID: nys_67/html/1141-12.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

O’REILLY, Respondent, v. STEPHENS, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
    November 27, 1900.)
    Action by Marie F. O’Reilly against Olin, J. Stephens. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
    Affirmed.
    Arthur Knox, for appellant.
    Maurice Mayer, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We do not think that the circumstances adverted to by the defendant’s counsel respecting the conduct of the trial justify the criticism made by him. They certainly cannot be said to have operated to the prejudice of his client, in view of the fact that the plaintiff’s evidence respecting the defendant’s liability is absolutely without contradiction. Judgment affirmed, with costs.