Case ID: f-appx_200/html/0715-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Allan SCHULER, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-10779.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Aug. 17, 2006.
    Filed Sept. 5, 2006.
    Gary M. Restaino, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Jon M. Sands, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant — Appellant.
    Before: CANBY, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
   MEMORANDUM

There was sufficient evidence, albeit circumstantial, from which a rational trier of fact could conclude that Appellant Robert Schuler knowingly possessed destructive devices in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d). See United States v. Brady, 579 F.2d 1121, 1127 (9th Cir.1978) (“[C]ircumstantial evidence can be used to prove any fact, in-eluding facts from which another fact is to be inferred.”).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.