Case ID: ark_305/html/0537-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ernest Dewayne LEMONS v. STATE of Arkansas
    CR 91-108
    808 S.W.2d 778
    Supreme Court of Arkansas
    Opinion delivered May 20, 1991
    
      Daniel D. Becker, for appellant.
    
      Winston Bryant, Att’y Gen., by: Pamela Rumpz, Asst. Att’y Gen., for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

We grant appellant’s motion to supplement record and to revise briefs subject to the parties briefing the issues as to whether supplementation of record is proper in this case, and if so, how such additional record (and evidence introduced at the jury proceeding on March 28,1991) should affect the revocation decision now submitted in this appeal.

We deny appellant’s motion for review of appeal bond.