Case ID: ny_213/html/0636-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary A. Kunz, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant.
    (Argued October 19, 1914;
    decided November 10, 1914.)
    
      Kunz v. City of N. Y., 155 App. Div. 920, affirmed.
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 5, 1913, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant in failing to keep a sidewalk in proper repair.
    
      Frank L. Polk, Corporation Counsel (Edward A. Freshman and James D. Bell of counsel), for appellant.
    
      Frederick E. Fishel and Hamilton Anderson for respondent.
   Judgment .affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Werner, Chase, Collin, Hogan, Miller and Cardozo, JJ.