Case ID: sw2d_895/html/0083-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Quience WARD, Appellant, v. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, et al., Respondent.
    No. 64857.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Jan. 17, 1995.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 22, 1995.
    Application to Transfer Denied April 25, 1995.
    Norton Y. Beilenson, Susman, Schermer, Rimmel & Shifrin, St. Louis, for appellant.
    David M. Duree, Nicholas B. Carter, Rei-nert, Duree & Crane, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this jury-tried negligence action, plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendants.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).