Case ID: sw3d_472/html/0653-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael B. SCHLUETER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 102348
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    
    Filed: October 20, 2015
    
      Erika R. Eliason, Woodrail Center, 1000 W. Nifong, Bldg. 7 Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 889, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent,
    Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Michael Schlueter appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Schlueter raises one point on appeal, asserting that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because there was no factual basis in the plea-court record to support his guilty pleas for first-degree child molestation, and thus his guilty pleas were involuntary, unknowing, and unintelligent. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).