Case ID: cust-ct_2/html/0737-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Sullivan, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 41521.
    Protests 865046-G, etc., of M. Pressner & Co. et al. (New York).
   Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) squawker balloons and so-called cigarette whistles or noisemakers, not toys, in chief value of bamboo, at 45 percent under paragraph 409, Abstracts 40493 and 39509 followed; (2) tennis rackets similar to those the subject of Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48573) at 30 percent under paragraph 1502; and (3) siren whistles and horns like those the subject of Abstracts 39948 and 40480 at 45 percent under paragraph 397.