Case ID: f-appx_36/html/0083-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John A. LENHART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, and GE Lighting Systems, Incorporated, Defendant.
    No. 01-2325.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted April 11, 2002.
    Decided June 3, 2002.
    John W. Gresham, Ferguson, Stein, Chambers, Wallas, Adkins, Gresham & Sumter, P.A., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. G. Scott Humphrey, Moore & Van Allen, P.L.L.C., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

John A. Lenhart appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to General Electric Company on Lenhart’s claims of discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621-634 (West 1999 & Supp. 2001), and a related state law claim. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Lenhart’s motion for leave to file additional material, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lenhart v. Gen. Elec. Co., No. CA-99-174-3-MU (W.D.N.C. filed Sept. 28, 2001 & entered Oct. 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.