Case ID: ill_181/html/0415-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George B. Cruickshank et al. v. The City of Chicago.
    
      Opinion filed October 19, 1899.
    
    This case is controlled by the decision in Holden v. City of Chicago, 172 Ill. 263.
    Writ of Error to the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Colostin D. Myers, Judge, presiding.
    Edgar Bronson Tolman, and Harvey Mitchell Harper, for plaintiffs in error.
    Charles S. Thornton, .Corporation Counsel, and John A. May, for defendant in error.
   Per Curiam:

This is a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the county court of Cook county confirming a special assessment. The ordinance providing for the improvement fails to state the heig'ht of. the curb required to be constructed ou each side of the street, and on account of this 'defect it is claimed that the ordinance is invalid. The ordinance involved, so far as the height of the curb is concerned, is substantially like the ordinance which was held to be invalid in Holden v. City of Chicago, 172 Ill. 263, and the ruling in that case must control here.

As to the property set out and described in thg assignment of errors in the record, the judgment of confirmation is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the county court.

Reversed and remanded.