Case ID: ny-super-ct_58/html/0567-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HANNIBAL G. CUTUGNO, Respondent v. THE MAYOR, etc., OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant.
    
      Interpreters of General Sessions, the right to appoint is vested in the recorder, city judge and, judge in the Court of General Sessions—Civil service laws, rules and regulations do not govern or apply to such appointments.
    
    Before Sedgwick Ch. J., and O’Gorman, J.
    
      Decided May 5, 1890.
    The question arose on an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to an answer setting up as a defence to a complaint for services rendered by the plaintiff as interpreter to the Court of General 'Sessions of the Peace of the city and county of New York, that he had not been appointed as such interpreter in compliance with certain rules established for the regulation of the civil service of the state of New York.
    
      William H. Clark, counsel for the corporation, for appellant.
    
      
      Le Barbier & Brewster, for. respondent.
   . The court held (O’Gorman, J., writing, Sedgwick, Ch. J., concurring) as set forth in the head note, and affirmed the order, with costs.