Case ID: njl_112/html/0501-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LOURATTE GLINSKY, RESPONDENT, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS.
    Submitted February 16, 1934
    Decided April 12, 1934.
    For the respondent, Feder & Rinzler.
    
    For the appellants, Fatten Ac Amlicke.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.