Case ID: f-appx_216/html/0917-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CANAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Defendants-Counter Claimants-Appellees.
    No. 06-13409
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Feb. 7, 2007.
    Joseph E.B. Stewart, Keri Donald Simms, Austill, Lewis & Simms, P.C. Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellant.
    
      Carol A. Smith, Elizabeth Hannah Bowles, Smith & Ely, LLP, Scott M. Salter, Starnes & Atchison, LLP, Birmingham, AL, for Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellee United States Fire Insurance Company.
    Before BLACK, MARCUS and COX, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Canal Insurance Company challenges on this appeal the district court’s resolution of this insurance coverage dispute by the grant of summary judgment.

We have considered the briefs of the parties, and relevant parts of the record. We conclude that summary judgment was properly granted for the reasons stated in the district court’s well-reasoned opinion.

AFFIRMED.