Case ID: f-appx_333/html/0730-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Tyrone HURT, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND; All Department of Corrections of the Forty Nine States of the USA, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 09-7500.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 28, 2009.
    Decided: Oct. 14, 2009.
    Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. Dep’t of Corrections, No. 8:09-cv-01248-RWT (D. Md. filed June 2, 2009, entered June 3, 2009). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.