Case ID: so2d_736/html/0151-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mauricio HERNANDEZ, M.D., and Family First Medical Centers, Inc., etc., et al., Appellants, v. Kurt D. STOFFER, Appellee.
    No. 98-746.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 7, 1999.
    Parenti, Falk, Waas, Hernandez, & Cor-tina and Gail Leverett Parenti, Coral Gables, for appellants.
    Deutsch & Blumberg and James C. Blecke; Osherow & Schwartz and Mark R. Osherow and Kenneth J. Schwartz, (Boca Raton), for appellee.
    Before LEVY, GODERICH, and FLETCHER, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Because the plaintiffs expert witness’ testimony created a conflict in the evidence, the trial court properly denied the defendants’ motions for directed verdict. See Lawrinson v. Bartruff, 600 So.2d 22 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Further, as to the remaining points raised by the defendants, we find that they lack merit. As such, we affirm the final judgment under review.

Affirmed.