Case ID: f-appx_548/html/0243-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffery C. McNEALY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 12-51291
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Dec. 10, 2013.
    Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Jose Montes, Jr., El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Jeffery McNealy appeals his jury-trial conviction of receipt/distribution of material involving the sexual exploitation of children and possession of material involving the sexual exploitation of children. For the first time on appeal, McNealy contends he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to retain a defense expert in the field of computer forensics.

“[T]he general rule in this circuit is that a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel cannot be resolved on direct appeal when the claim has not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Because we conclude that “we cannot fairly evaluate the claim from the record,” we decline to consider McNealy’s claim on direct appeal. See United States v. Gulley, 526 F.3d 809, 821-22 (5th Cir.2008); United States v. Lampazianie, 251 F.3d 519, 527 (5th Cir.2001).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.