Case ID: so2d_680/html/0454-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James Richard DEGON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 94-4337.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Jan. 19, 1996.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Kathleen Stover, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Stephen R. White, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm without further discussion the revocation of appellant’s probation. However, we vacate appellant’s sentence because the trial court did not have before it a score-sheet at the time of sentencing, and it cannot be determined whether appellant received a guidelines sentence absent a scoresheet. E.g., Brown v. State, 623 So.2d 800 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), review denied, 634 So.2d 627 (Fla.1994); Barr v. State, 474 So.2d 417 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). On remand, the trial court is directed to resentence appellant, with reference to a properly prepared scoresheet.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.

ERVIN, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.