Case ID: wash_89/html/0699-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[No. 11305.
    Department Two.
    January 27, 1916.]
    Northern Pacific Railway Company, Respondent, v. W. R. Tuttle, Appellant.
      
    
    Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Pendergast, J., entered March 15, 1912, in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to quiet title, tried to the court.
    Affirmed.
    
      Harris Baldwin, for appellant.
    
      Edward J. Cannon and Cannon, Ferris & Swan, for respondent.
    
      
       Reported in 154 Pac. 796.
    
   Per Curiam.

This case presents the same legal question involving the right of adverse possession of respondent’s right of way as presented in Northern-Pac. R. Co. v. Concannon, 239 U. S. 382. The question being a Federal one, the cited case is controlling.

Judgment affirmed.