Case ID: sw2d_962/html/0944-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DYNAMIC CABLE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. FIBER CABLE, INC., Defendant/Appellant.
    No. 72167.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Feb. 24, 1998.
    Stephen Robert Clark, St. Louis, Jacqueline S. Miller, Chopin, Miller & Yudenfreund, Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Mark R. Dunn, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this jury-tried case, plaintiff sued defendant for breach of three contracts. The jury found for plaintiff and awarded $272,640 damages.

Defendant raises five points on appeal. The first alleges the trial court erred in granting plaintiffs motion in limine to prohibit defendant from offering evidence as to the time within which plaintiff was to perform. The next three points allege the trial court erred in refusing to give three instructions defendant tendered. The final point alleges error in denying defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict. We affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).