Case ID: so2d_629/html/0102-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Patricia FRUETEL, Respondent.
    No. 81165.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Dec. 16, 1993.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Joan Fowler, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Criminal Law and Don M. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.
    Anthony C. Musto, Miami, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We review the decision of the district court of appeal in Fruetel v. State, 609 So.2d 697 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), on the jurisdictional ground of certified conflict. Art. Y, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

The decision under review is quashed on the authority of Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla.1993), and the case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Munoz.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.