Case ID: sw2d_838/html/0015-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Orlando LARKINS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. 61001.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    July 21, 1992.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 2, 1992.
    Application to Transfer Denied Oct. 27, 1992.
    David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for mov-ant/appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Rudolph R. Rhodes, IV, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent/respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion after pleading guilty to distribution of a controlled substance near a school. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).