Case ID: nj-eq_69/html/0833-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James M. Seymour, Jr., respondent, v. Rebecca Goodwin, executrix, et al., appellants. (Two cases.)
    [Argued June 22d, 1905.
    Decided March 5th, 1906.]
    On appeal from an order advised by Yice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in 68 N. J. Eq. 189.
    
    
      Messrs. Qorilancli and Wayne Parker, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. Louis A. Ziegler and Mr. James E. Howell, for the respondent.
   Pee Curiam.

The order brought up for review by these appeals is affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Yice-Chancellor Emery.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Fort, Garretson, Pitney, Bogert, Yeedenbuegh, AJroom, Green—8.

For reversal—Dixon, Garrison, Swayze—3.