Case ID: f-appx_156/html/0917-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard TEPLICK, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. THE BOEING COMPANY EMPLOYEE HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN, an Erisa employee welfare benefit plan, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 04-35690.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Nov. 16, 2005.
    Decided Dec. 2, 2005.
    James S. Coon, Esq., Swanson, Thomas & Coon, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Bruce C. Hamlin, Thomas W. Sondag, Esq., [Ret] William T. Patton, Esq., Lane Powell, P.C., Portland, OR, for Defendants Appellee.
    Before: KLEINFELD and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.
    
      
       The Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Tepliek never moved to supplement the record to provide evidence rebutting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. Before this Court, Tepliek admitted that he did not have any additional evidence to submit. Because he failed to attempt to provide additional evidence to the district court, Tepliek has waived any claim of prejudice regarding the development of the facts or scope of review.

Tepliek did not establish that his disability made him unable to perform his old job or any other job.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
     
      
      . Cf. Mongeluzo v. Baxter Travenol Long Term Disability Benefit Plan, 46 F.3d 938, 943-944 (9th Cir. 1995).