Case ID: ny_170/html/0561-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nathan Krauskopf, Appellant, v. Clarence E. Tallman, Respondent.
    
      Krauskopf v. Tallman, 38 App. Div. 273, affirmed.
    (Argued January 20, 1902;
    decided February 11, 1902.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 12, 1899, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term.
    
      Leopold Leo for appellant.
    
      George M. Ourtis for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Absent: Parker, Ch. J.