Case ID: sw3d_74/html/0807-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kathy FLEAHMAN, Michelle Fleahman, and Melissa Fleahman, b/n/f Kathy Fleahman, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. Charles W. FLEAHMAN, Jr., and Donna Marie Fleahman, Defendants/Appellants.
    No. ED 79395.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    March 26, 2002.
    Rehearing Denied May 14, 2002.
    Daniel W. Deiter, Montogomery City, MO, for appellants.
    
      Dennis G. Schafer, Montgomery City, MO, for respondents.
    Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this action to set aside a deed for fraud and an accounting for partnership assets, defendants, Charles Fleahman, Jr., and Donna Fleahman, appeal from the judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs, Kathy Fleahman and her two daughters. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have, however, been provided with a memorandum for their information only setting forth reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).