Case ID: nys_131/html/1143-08.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SEPPALA, Respondent, v. WARE et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    October 13, 1911.)
    Action by David Seppala against William V. Ware and others.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the writing shows that the principal, Imatra I., was disclosed as the principal contracting, and that the defendants each executed the paper in his capacity as member of the committee, and hence as the agent of Imatra I.