Case ID: njl_97/html/0331-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ELIZA GEISEL, RESPONDENT, v. THE REGINA COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Submitted December 5, 1921
    Decided February 9, 1922.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 96 N. J. L. 31.
    For the respondent, Kalisch & Kalisch.
    
    For the appellant, Randolph Perkins.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenehard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Black, Katzenbach, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.