Case ID: sw2d_936/html/0856-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael CHARLESTON, Appellant. Michael CHARLESTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 69075.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Dec. 24, 1996.
    Ellen H. Flottman, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David R. Truman, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before CRANE, P.J., and GERALD M. SMITH and PUDLOWSKI, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of robbery in the second degree and resisting arrest. He also appeals from the denial of his post-conviction motion, Rule 29.15, without an evidentiary hearing. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion. The findings of fact made on the post-conviction motion are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears and there was evidence to support the verdict. The parties have been furnished with a statement of the reasons for our decision.

Judgments of conviction affirmed; judgment denying post-conviction motion affirmed. Rules 30.25(b), 84.16(b).