Case ID: sw3d_169/html/0557-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rodney K. JAMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 64408.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Aug. 16, 2005.
    Susan L. Hogan, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before HARDWICK, P.J., BRECKENRIDGE and SPINDEN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rodney James appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, following an evi-dentiary hearing. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s determination that James failed to prove his ineffective assistance of counsel claim by a preponderance of the evidence. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).