Case ID: ohio-st-3d_128/html/1556-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

2011-0586.
    Core v. State.
   Franklin App. No. 09AP-192,191 Ohio App.3d 651, 2010-Ohio-6292. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decision in 2009-0088, State v. Williams, Warren App. No. CA2008-02-029, 2008-Ohio-6195; and briefing schedule stayed.

Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I and hold the cause for the decision in 2010-1660, State v. Palmer, Franklin App. Nos. 09AP-956 and 09AP-957, 2010-Ohio-2421.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.