Case ID: ny_300/html/0593-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Fanning, Appellant.
    Submitted November 28, 1949;
    decided December 29, 1949.
    
      
      John Fanning, appellant in person.
    
      Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney (Edgar J. Nathan, 3d, and. Whitman Knapp of counsel), for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The defendant’s petition does not sufficiently allege a case of fraudulent use of perjured testimony by the prosecuting attorney to warrant relief by a coram nobis proceeding. The order should be affirmed.

Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Bromley, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed. [See 300 N. Y. 677.]