Case ID: so2d_545/html/0940-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "POLEN, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael MARLOW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 88-3274.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    June 7, 1989.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Allen J. DeWeese, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   POLEN, Judge.

This appeal is taken from a conviction and sentence under section 893.13(l)(e), Florida Statutes (1987). Appellant unsuccessfully challenged the constitutionality of this statute in the trial court as being viola-tive of the “one-subject rule.”

This court specifically found that the challenged statute was constitutional in State v. Burch, 545 So.2d 279 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). We further have certified the question to the supreme court.

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court on authority of Burch. Issuance of the mandate is stayed pending disposition of the certified question by the supreme court.

GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., concur.