Case ID: ohio-law-abs_1/html/0361-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

KUBIAK v. STATE
    Ohio Court of Appeals, Eighth Dist.
    No. 4377.
    March 19, 1923
    This opinion has not bnen published except in Abstract.
    STOLEN AUTOMOBILE! receiving — Conviction sustained.
    Vickery, P. J., Sullivan and Levine JJ.
    Error to Cuyahoga Common Pleas
    Judgment Affirmed
    . - Attorney St-^D, R'./Hertz and C.:..'Ai Lefkowitz,. £or Kubiak; E. C. Stanton,' Contra-.- :■ -.- k., :
   PER CURIAM.

Epitomized Opinion

It is sought herein to reverse a judgment of conviction against Joe Kubiak, for receiving a stolen auto, that he knew to have been stolen. Several errors are urged why the judgment should be reversed, all of (which are highly technical, except the one that ■ it is contrary to - the weight - of the evidence.' This question was submitted to the -jury, and it is not so contrary to the’ evidence that this court would be warranted in interfering. The récord shows that, beyond' any doubt, he was guilty of receiving this property, and the circumstances-'all point to the fact that he'knew that it-was: stolen, and upon - the ’ whole record, the'jury was warranted in coming té thé conclúsion it'did." ' - ' '- - ■'