Case ID: nc_1-2/html/0025-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "The Court", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Yarborough versus Beard.
    THIS was an action of trespass quare clausum fregit, brought to try the title. Plea, liberum tenementum. The plaintiff claimed title under Adlai Osborne as attorney for the trustees of the University, and his deed, as such, was read; a question then arose, whether it was incumbent on the plaintiff to produce the power of attorney constituting Adlai Osborne such, and authorizing him to make a title to lands; and if that were necessary, then, whether, as the original did not belong to the plaintiff, the Register’s books containing a copy, would be sufficient without other proofs of its being a true copy. Upon which questions,
    If a deed be executed by an attorney, his power must be produced. Instruments that are required to be recorded, are sufficient evidence for the party, when the original is lost, and complete evidence for strangers. As to instruments not required to be recorded, the Register’s certificate is of no validity.
   The Court

were of opinion, 1st. that whenever a deed was executed by virtue of a power of attorney, the power, or a copy of it, must be produced; and that as the plaintiff was not bound to have possession of the original, he may supply its absence with the next best evidence. 2d. That when an instrument of writing must be recorded in order to be valid, a copy, certified by the Register, is sufficient evidence for the party who ought to have the original, if it be lost; and is complete evidence for a stranger. In these cases, which are specified in the acts of the legislature, the law gives evidence to the certificates of the Register, because he acts by its direction and under its authority; but in other cases, his certificates are no more admissible, than those of a private person; and as registration is not necessary to give validity to powers of attorney, the books cannot be received in the present case. If the person who copied the power into the Register’s book were present to prove it a true copy, it would be sufficient, upon the common principle of evidence, that if the party has not the original he may give a copy in evidence; if he has no copy, he may prove by parol the contents of the deed.