Case ID: so2d_566/html/0018-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. LETTS, Judge, WALDEN, Judge,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BELLWETHER PROPERTIES, Appellant, v. TOMBERG AND TOMBERG, P.A., and Diamond C. Properties, Inc., Appellees.
    No. 89-1220.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Aug. 8, 1990.
    Rehearing Denied Sept. 18, 1990.
    Robert C. Furr of Furr and Cohen, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant.
    Mark B. Kleinfeld and George H. Bailey of Jones, Foster, Johnston & Stubbs, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WARNER, J., concurs.

LETTS, J., concurs specially with opinion.

WALDEN, J., dissents with opinion.

LETTS, Judge,

specially concurs.

I write specially rather than producing a full-blown opinion which would not, in my opinion, add to the body of the law. However, it needs to be explained that this case began in 1987, was set for trial in December of 1988, said trial on the docket for March 20, 1989. Through all this time and up until the second to the last day of February, 1989, the deposition of the main character in this proceeding was never taken. Further, it was not until March 6, 1989 that a motion to amend the pleadings was filed based on the belated deposition. Under these facts, I cannot hold that Judge Rodgers abused his discretion by refusing to permit the amendment. It is well settled that the liberality espoused in granting motions to amend “diminishes as the case progresses to trial.” Allett v. Hill, 422 So.2d 1047, 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

WALDEN, Judge,

(dissenting).

I respectfully dissent because in my opinion under the facts of this case the trial court abused its discretion and committed reversible error in denying Bellwether Properties, Inc., motion to amend pleadings to add an affirmative defense.

I would reverse and remand with instructions to allow such amendment.