Case ID: a3d_177/html/0822-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Charles Edward BROOKS, Petitioner
    No. 434 WAL 2015
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    January 3, 2018
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

1. Is it unconstitutional to require [Petitioner]' to register for a lifetime when said registration requirement exceeds the statutory maximum penalty for [Petitioner’s] offense?
2. Is the Adam Walsh Statute unconstitutional in requiring the [Petitioner] to register for a lifetime?

The judgment of sentence'is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Muniz, — Pa. -, 164 A.3d 1189 (2017).