Case ID: so2d_763/html/1273-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James B. FORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D00-2286.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Aug. 9, 2000.
    
      James B. Ford, Century, pro se.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s 1997 sentence as an habitual offender, as such sentences are not affected by the supreme court’s decision in Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000) (revised opinion). An habitual offender sentence is not a guidelines sentence even where, as here, the actual sentence imposed coincides with the bottom of guidelines.

GUNTHER, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ„ concur.