Case ID: so2d_766/html/0410-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Derik HOSKINS, Appellant, v. The CITY OF MIAMI, et al., Appellees.
    No. 3D00-279.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Aug. 16, 2000.
    Derik Hoskins, in proper person.
    Alejandro Vilarello, City Attorney, and George K. Wysong, III, and Myrna D. Bricker, Assistant City Attorneys, for ap-pellees.
    Before COPE, GERSTEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Mandamus is not the proper remedy for redress of Appellant Derik Hoskins’ complaints. See Davis v. City of South Bay, 433 So.2d 1364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).