Case ID: f-appx_606/html/0114-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Deborah V. HUBBARD, a/k/a Deborah Videtto Hubbard, a/k/a Deborah Hubbard-Sarvis, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William BYARS, Jr.; Judy Anderson; T. Tyler; D. Foulk, a/k/a Officer Foulks; Sadi Rafi, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 15-6207.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 25, 2015.
    Decided: June 30, 2015.
    Deborah V. Hubbard, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr., Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Deborah V. Hubbard appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hubbard v. Byars, No. 8:14-cv-00038-BHH (D.S.C. Jan. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.