Case ID: ga-app_30/html/0594-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Luke, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

14567.
    
    Golightly et al. v. Tatum.
    Decided July 10, 1923.
    Complaint; from Campbell superior court' — Judge Hutcheson. December 2, 1922.
    
      J. F. Golightly, J. II. Longino,'iov plaintiffs.
    
      Lawrence Camp, Claude C. Smith, for defendant.
   Luke, J.

This ease is here upon the sole assignment of .error that the evidence does not authorize the verdict. There was evidence to authorize the verdict in favor of the defendant, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. It was therefore not error to overrule the motion for a new tiral.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.