Case ID: so2d_440/html/0609-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MOED, INC., d/b/a Griffing House Apartments, Appellant, v. WASH AND DRY, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.
    No. 83-598.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Nov. 8, 1983.
    John Kirk McDonald, Claudia B. Green-berg, Coral Gables, for appellant.
    Richard D. Katz, Coral Gables, for appel-lee.
    Before HENDRY, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant, defendant below, raises several issues for review, only one of which was both an issue in the trial court and adequately preserved for review, i.e., whether it should have been relieved of its duty to perform according to the terms of a written agreement because of appellee’s alleged nonperformance. There is sufficient evidence in the record to support the jury’s verdict in favor of appellee.

Affirmed.