Case ID: ga-app_63/html/0304-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Broyles, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

28507.
    Hendrix v. The State.
    Decided October 3, 1940.
    
      J. R. Hutcheson, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Hal G. Hutchens, solicitor-general, W. L. Denton, W. A. Foster Jr., contra.
   Broyles, C. J.

The accused was tried on an indictment charging him with rape, and was convicted of an assault with intent to rape. His motion for new trial (consisting of the general grounds only) was overruled, and he excepted to that judgment. The evidence for the State amply authorized the verdict. The defendant did not introduce any evidence; and his statement denying his guilt was evidently rejected by the jury. The refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.