Case ID: ohio-st-3d_68/html/0482-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Malkin.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Malkin (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 482.]
    (No. 93-1739
    Submitted January 5, 1994
    Decided March 23, 1994.)
    
      
      Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
    
      James M. Burge, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent and would disbar respondent.