Case ID: f-appx_45/html/0608-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Teobaldo ZEVALLOS-ZUMAETA, aka Miguel A. Cardenas, Jose Luis Gonzalez-Rivera, Jorge Mendoza, Aldo Daniel Villalobos, Alfred George Cruzado-Gonzales, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 01-10682.
    D.C. No. CR-01-00406TUC-JMR (JMF).
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 12, 2002.
    
    Decided Aug. 19, 2002.
    Before HALL, KOZINSKI, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. R. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Consistent with United States v. Vonn, - U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1043, 1046, 152 L.Ed.2d 90 (2002), we have reviewed the record to assess Teobaldo Zevallos-Zu-maeta’s Rule 11 and Rule 32 challenges. We conclude that the plea was knowing and voluntary and in compliance with Rule 11. The plea agreement contained an explicit waiver of appeal, and the record reflects that Zevallos-Zumaeta was advised that he waived any right to appeal so long as his sentence was consistent with the plea agreement; thus, the Rule 32 challenge also lacks force. See United States v. DeSantiago-Martinez, 38 F.3d 394, 395-96 (9th Cir.1992) (dismissing appeal on Rule 11 and Rule 32 grounds because defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal).

DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.