Case ID: njl_88/html/0718-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOSEPH D. HENDRICKSON, RESPONDENT, v. HANNAH L. ANDREWS, EXECUTRIX OF THE WILL OF BENAJAH D. ANDREWS, DECEASED, APPELLANT.
    Argued November 23, 1915
    Decided March 6, 1916.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court.
    For the appellant, French & Richards.
    
    For the respondent, Bleakly & Stockwell.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will he affirmed, for the reasons expressed/ in the per curiam opinion of this court in John Nix & Co. v. Hannah L. Andrews, &c., No. 86 of the November term, 1915.

For affirmance—The ■ Chancellor, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisoi-i, Black, Terhune, Hehpenheimee, Williams, Taylor, JJ. 11.

For reversal—-None.