Case ID: pa-super_167/html/0022-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Commonwealth v. Dugan, Appellant et al.
    Argued April 10, 1950.
    Before Rhodes, P. J., Hirt, Reno, Dithrich, Ross and Arnold, JJ.
    
      N. J. IÁppard and U. G. Yogan, for appellant, submitted a brief.
    
      Marjorie H. Matson, Assistant District Attorney, with her William S. Rahauser, District Attorney and Samuel Strauss, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.
    July 20 1950:
   Per Curiam,

Appellant Dugan was convicted of the same offense and in the same trial as Flaherty, whose appeal has been disposed of in an opinion filed this day. Dugan raises the same questions which have been completely answered in the Flaherty opinion. A separate opinion is unnecessary.

Judgment and sentence affirmed.