Case ID: ad3d_52/html/0258-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Kevin O’Neill, Petitioner, v City of New York et al., Respondents.
    [859 NYS2d 183]
   Determination of respondent Fire Department’s Commissioner, dated October 13, 2005, terminating petitioner’s employment as a firefighter, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [William A. Wetzel, J.], entered June 12, 2007), dismissed, without costs.

The penalty of termination for testing positive for marijuana during a random drug test under a zero tolerance policy in effect at the time of the decision does not shock the conscience (see Trotta v Ward, 77 NY2d 827 [1991]; Matter of Kirk v City of New York, 47 AD3d 406 [2008]; Matter of McGovern v Safir, 266 AD2d 107 [1999]). Although petitioner alleges that changes have been made to the Fire Department’s policy regarding marijuana usage subsequent to petitioner’s termination, we reject petitioner’s claim that the changes should be retroactively applied to his case (see Matter of Solomon v Department of Bldgs. of City of N.Y., 46 AD3d 370, 372 [2007]). Concur—Saxe, J.P, Nardelli, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.