Case ID: so2d_457/html/1155-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Juan HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 84-647.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Oct. 26, 1984.
    Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and L.S. Alperstein, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Karla J. Staker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We disagree with the appellant’s two contentions.

There was sufficient evidence to support the order of the trial judge finding that the appellant violated conditions of his probation. Furthermore, it was proper for the trial judge to depart from the sentencing guidelines using the violation of probation by the appellant as the basis for doing so. Addison v. State, 452 So.2d 955 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

AFFIRMED.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and DANAHY and LEHAN, JJ., concur.