Case ID: ohio-st_176/html/0349-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State, ex rel. The Hall China Co., Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee. (Two cases.)
    (Nos. 38594 and 38595
    Decided June 17, 1964.)
    
      Messrs. Vorys, Safer, Seymour & Pease, Mr. Russell P. Herrold, Jr., Messrs. Squire, Sanders S Dempsey and Mr. William C. Hartman, for appellant.
    
      Mr. William B. Saxbe, attorney general, Mr. Robert M. Duncan and Mr. Robert N. Wistner, for appellee.
   Per Curiam.

The Industrial Commission, a fact-finding administrative agency, has made factual determinations in these causes. This court cannot say, from an examination of the records, that the commission abused its discretion in making such findings. A clear legal right to writs of mandamus has not been established.

The judgments of the Court of Appeals are affirmed.

Judgments affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.