Case ID: ga-app_28/html/0345-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Luke, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

13153.
    Floyd et al. v. The State.
   Luke, J.

A conviction of the offense of larceny from the house was fully supported by the evidence; the verdict has the approval of the trial judge, and the defendants had a legal trial. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial, which was based only upon the usual general grounds.

Decided March 7, 1922.

Indictment for larceny from house; from Pulaski superior court — Judge Graham. November 12, 1921.

D. R. Pearce, H. F. Lawson, for plaintiff in error.

M. H. Boyer, solicitor-general, contra.

■Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.