Case ID: ad2d_228/html/0674-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Nancy Buntzman, Respondent, v Arol I. Buntzman, Appellant.
    [644 NYS2d 986]
   The Family Court had jurisdiction over the instant application (see, Family Ct Act § 466). The appellant’s remaining contention is without merit (see, Matter of Cox v Cox, 181 AD2d 201, 204; Singer v Singer, 180 AD2d 725). Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.