Case ID: f-appx_318/html/0197-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Geidy VERJANO, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 09-6098.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 12, 2009.
    Decided: March 18, 2009.
    Geidy Verjano, Appellant Pro Se. Isaac Louis Johnson, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    
      Affii’med by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Geidy Verjano appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to modify her sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Verjano, No. 6:06-cr-00633-HMH (D.S.C. Jan. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.