Case ID: so2d_469/html/0142-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MILLBROOK INVESTMENTS, N.V., Mallville Investments, N.V., Ozone Investments, N.V., Saville Investments, N.V., Molbeston Corporation, N.V., Hatterway Corporation, N.V., all Netherlands Antilles corporations, Appellants, v. Kenneth W. ROTH, Executive Management, Inc., Arthur R. Scott, and Charles A. Forbes, Appellees.
    No. 84-1204.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Jan. 29, 1985.
    Thomson, Zeder, Bohrer, Werth, Adorno & Razook and John W. Zeder and Susan H. Aprill and Rana M. Gorzeck, Miami, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker and Joseph J. O’Malley, Los Angeles, Cal, for appellants.
    Burnett Roth, Miami Beach, Stephens, Lynn, Chernay & Klein and Robert M. Klein and Andrew Seiden, Miami, for appel-lees.
    Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The lower court’s Order of Dismissal With Prejudice is reversed upon a holding that the causes of action alleged in the plaintiffs’ second amended complaint are sufficiently pleaded so as not to be subject to dismissal; that the plaintiffs have sufficiently alleged their standing to bring such action; that the false representations allegedly made by the defendants are not, as a matter of law, nonactionable statements of opinion; and that there is no reason inhering in the alleged transaction between the parties which would legally preclude the action from proceeding.

Reversed and remanded.