Case ID: nys_129/html/1144-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURHAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RITLER, Respondent, v. ACME ENGINEERING & CONTRACTING CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department,
    May 3, 1911.)
    Action by Mary Ritier against the Acme Engineering & Contracting Company.
   PER CURHAM.

Judgment and order reversed, on the ground that the verdict is excessive, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event, unless the plaintiff stipulates to reduce the verdict to $1,500, in which case the judgment is modified, and, as so modified, judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

SMITH, P. J., and BETTS, J., vote for affirmance without modification.