Case ID: ny_285/html/0611-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harold S. Clark, Appellant, v. George A. Reynolds, Respondent.
    Submitted February 24, 1941;
    decided March 4, 1941.
    
      
      Harold S. Clark, in person, for motion.
    No one opposed.
   Motion denied. The moving papers do not indicate that the plaintiff moved for a direction of a verdict or that the trial court erred in submitting questions of fact to the jury. Upon an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division reversing a judgment on the facts and granting a new trial, this court may consider only whether as matter of law on the evidence the plaintiff was entitled to judgment.” (Rockowitz C. & B. Corp. v. Madame X Co., 248 N. Y. 272.)