Case ID: md_220/html/0659-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BUSCEMI v. WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION
    [P. C. No. 3,
    September Term, 1959 (Adv.).]
    
      
      Decided July 6, 1959.
    
    Before Bruñe, C. J., and Henderson, Hammond, Prescott and Horney, JJ.
   Per Curiam.

Application for leave to appeal is denied for the reasons set out in the opinion of the court below. On the first point, that his sentence as a second offender was illegal, because Code (1957), Art. 27, sec. 300, was enacted subsequent to his first conviction in 1949, see also Taylor v. Warden, 213 Md. 646, and Beard v. Warden, 211 Md. 658, which dispose of the point. Cf. Buscemi v. Warden, 215 Md. 620.