Case ID: njl_74/html/0594-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PHILADELPHIA AND CAMDEN FERRY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. INTERCITY LINK RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    Argued July 10, 1906 —
    Decided February 2, 1907.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    
      Eor the plaintiff in error, Gaskill & Gaskill.
    
    For the defendant in error, Martin V. Bergen, Jr.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment removed into this court by this writ of error is affirmed, on the grounds stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Dixon, in the Supreme Court, printed in 44 Vroom 86.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Reed, Trenohard, Bogert, Yre-DENBURGH, YROOM, GREEN, GRAY, J.J. 12.

For reversal — Hone.