Case ID: so2d_750/html/0770-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "GRIFFIN, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DOYLE GROUP, d/b/a Chiropractic Economics, Appellant, v. Daniel B. SCHERER, Appellee.
    No. 5D99-2322.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Feb. 11, 2000.
    Jay A. Gayoso, of Homer, Bonner & Delgado, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.
    Dennis K Bayer, Flagler Beach, for Ap-pellee.
   GRIFFIN, J.

Appellant, Doyle Group, d/b/a Chiropractic Economics [“Doyle”], seeks review of an order denying a temporary injunction to enforce a non-compete agreement. Although we agree that the more logical interpretation of the non-compete agreement is Doyle’s, it was within the purview of the lower court to determine that the language is not without doubt and that a temporary injunction should not be entered.

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.