Case ID: nys_147/html/1116-10.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HOCH, Respondent, v. CHESTER, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    May 1, 1914.)
    Action by Abraham Hoch against Samuel Chester.
   PER CURIAM.

Order modified, by inserting therein a recital that the grounds of the injunction are that it .appears by affidavits that defendant during the pendency of the action is doing, or procuring or suffering to bé done, or threatens or is about to do, or procure or suffer to be done, an act in violation of plaintiff’s rights respecting the subject of the action, and tending to render the judgment ineffectual, and, as so modified, the said order is affirmed, without costs.