Case ID: idaho_60/html/0167-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "GIVENS, J. — MORGAN, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(No. 6628.
    April 6, 1939.)
    HARRY EVANS, as Administrator of the Estate of Doris Evans, Deceased, Appellant, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation, and H. W. JOSHTON (JOHNSTON), Respondents.
    [89 Pac. (2d) 552.]
    Maurice H. Green and Karl Paine, for Appellant.
    
      Geo. H. Smith, H. B. Thompson and L. H. Anderson, for Respondents.
   GIVENS, J. —

This is a companion ease to Whiffin v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al., 60 Ida. 141, 89 Pac. (2d) 540, the only difference being that herein Mrs. Evans was a guest in the automobile. No separate briefs were filed or assignments of error furnished, and, counsel being willing to let this case rest entirely upon the disposition of Whiffin v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al., we are likewise, indicating nothing in regard to any points that might have been raised for or against appellant herein as a guest.

Upon the authority of Whiffin v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al., ante, p. 141, 89 Pac. (2d) 540, the judgment is affirmed.

Costs awarded to respondents.

Ailshie, C. J., and Budge, J., concur.

MORGAN, J.,

Dissenting. — For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Whiffin v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al., ante, p. 141, 89 Pac. (2d) 540, I dissent from the decision in this ease.

Justice Holden concurs in this dissent.