Case ID: f2d_82/html/0999-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

AMERICAN STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. WICKWIRE SPENCER STEEL COMPANY, Defendant. JOSEPH & ZEAMANS, Appellants, v. AMERICAN STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as Trustee, and Chase National Bank of the City of New York, as Trustee, Complainants-Appellees, Wickwire Spencer Steel Company, Defendant-Appellee, Edward C. Bowers and Charles L. Feldman, as Receivers of Wickwire Spencer Steel Company, Defendants-Appellees, Rudolph P. Flershem, John E. White, and Walter Tufts, as a Committee under Protective Agreement Dated October 28, 1927, for Five-Year Six Per Centum Class B Notes of Wickwire Spencer Steel Company, and Frederic W. Allen, Arthur H. Lockett, Acosta Nichols, Robert W. Stearns, and George W. Treat, as a Reorganization Committee Acting by and under a Plan and Agreement of Reorganization Dated May 27, 1929, Intervening Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 294.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    April 6, 1936.
    Joseph & Zeamans, of New York City (Harold R. Zeamans, of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.
    
      Davis, Polk, Wardwell, (Sardiner & Reed, of New York City (L. H. Coleman and G. Campbell Becket, both of New York City, of counsel), for Guaranty Trust Co. of New York, as trustee.
    Larkin, Rathbone & Perry, of New 'York City (Henry- E. Kelley and Franklin Benkard, both of New York City, of counsel), for reorganization committee.
    Dudley, Stowe & Sawyer, of Buffalo, N. Y. (Joseph G. Dudley and Mason O. Damon, both of Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for Edward C. Bowers and Charles L. Feldman, as receivers, etc., defendantsappellees.
    Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Davis v. Seneca Falls Mfg. Co. (C.C.A.) 17 F.(2d) 546; Nolte v. Hudson Navigation Co. (C.C.A.) 47 F.(2d) 166; In re New York Investors (C.C.A.) 79 F.(2d) 182.