Case ID: ad_283/html/1013-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of Carl S. Bresnick, Appellant, against Forman Skirt Company, Inc., Defendant, and Samuel Goldin et al., Doing Business as Goldin Bros., et al., Respondents.
   The restrictive provision in paragraph 6 ” of the order was not consented to by petitioner-appellant, and is clearly improper. It should not have been made part of the court’s order. Order unanimously modified by striking therefrom paragraph 6 ” and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Bastow and Botein, JJ.