Case ID: or-app_91/html/0176-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted April 28,
    fine vacated; order otherwise affirmed May 11, 1988
    HOWARD JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Respondent.
    
    (07-87-333; CA A45463)
    753 P2d 959
    Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.
    Jan Londahl, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Scott McAlister, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.
    Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary which imposed a $100 fine for violation of a disciplinary rule. He contends, inter alia, that the fine is invalid. We agree. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).

The other claim of error has no merit.

Fine vacated; order otherwise affirmed.