Case ID: ad3d_88/html/0741-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Heron Inniss, Appellant.
    [930 NYS2d 469]
   The defendant’s contentions raised in point one of his brief are partially unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, those contentions do not warrant reversal (see People v Lewis, 48 AD3d 483, 484 [2008]; People v Wright, 40 AD3d 1021 [2007]; see also People v Singh, 299 AD2d 498, 499 [2002]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.