Case ID: sw3d_297/html/0149-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Kimoni RUSSELL, Appellant.
    No. WD 69775.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Nov. 17, 2009.
    Susan E. Summers, Esq., Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, Esq., and John M. Reeves, Esq., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before Division One: ALOKAHUJA, P.J., and JAMES MADISON SMART, JR. and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kimoni L. Russell appeals his conviction for robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 2000. In his sole Point Relied On, Russell argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction on a theory of accomplice liability. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).