Case ID: njl_111/html/0282-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE EATON AXLE AND SPRING COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. BREEZE CORPORATIONS, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT.
    Argued February 13, 1933
    Decided September 27, 1933.
    For the respondent, Andrew J. Whinery.
    
    For the appellant, Lionel P. KristeTler.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 1100.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Case, Heher, Van Buskirk, Hetfielu, Dear, Wells, JJ. 8.

For dismissal — Parker, Kays, JJ. 2.