Case ID: so2d_802/html/0484-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Chaz DAVIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D01-3095.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 26, 2001.
    Chaz Davis, in proper person.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before COPE, FLETCHER, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). We also certify the same question as in Major:

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAS A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?