Case ID: nj-eq_120/html/0200-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bridgeport Brass Company, complainant, v. Feuser & Sullivan, Incorporated, a corporation, defendant; Green & Green, appellants.
    [Argued February term, 1936.
    Decided April 24th, 1936.]
    
      Messrs. Green & Green, pro se, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. Michael G. Alenick, for Feuser & Sullivan, Incorporated.
   Per Curiam.

The appeal is from an order denying an application for counsel fee in resisting an adjudication of insolvency, and from an order denying a claim for alleged services in collecting certain accounts receivable of .the defendant corporation.

A careful examination of the record satisfies us that the orders complained of were entered pursuant to the exercise of a sound discretion and they are, therefore, affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hei-ier, Perseie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Hone. .