Case ID: so2d_332/html/0025-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William BUCOLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Ronald A. SIMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. James R. AGUT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. William BUCOLO and James R. Agut, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 38280, 38279, 38278, 38424.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    April 28, 1976.
    
      Richard Yale Feder, Irma Robbins Fed-er, Miami, Alfred I. Hopkins, Miami Beach, and Allan V. Everard, Riviera Beach, for appellants.
    Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We reconsider our opinion in the instant case appearing at 316 So.2d 551 (1975), pursuant to the direction of the United States Supreme Court in Bucolo v. Adkins, — U.S. —, 96 S.Ct. 1086, 47 L.Ed.2d 301, 44 U.S.L.W. 3500 (1976). That Court, referring to its opinion in Bucolo v. Florida, 421 U.S. 927, 95 S.Ct. 1651, 44 L.Ed.2d 84 (1975), held this state was “clearly foreclosed” from proceeding further in this cause.

In accordance therewith, the convictions of appellants are reversed and they are hereby discharged from further response to these proceedings.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.