Case ID: ny_291/html/0656-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John C. Rochester, Appellant, v. Hugh G. Bergen et al., Respondents.
    Argued June 14, 1943;
    decided October 14, 1943.
    
      ' Henry Vollmer, Jr., and John C. Osborne for appellant.
    
      Lloyd P. Stryker, Howard A. Rochford and Harold W. Wolf- , ram for respondents. 1
   Per Curiam.

Paragraph 3 of the agreement is invalid. Paragraph 2 is inseparable from paragraph 3 and falls with it. There has been no refusal or failure to perform any other provision of the agreement. The judgment appealed from denying specific performance and dismissing the complaint is therefore affirmed, with costs.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.