Case ID: so2d_557/html/0246-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edward J. BROPHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 89-0586.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    March 7, 1990.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Cherry Grant, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Edward J. Brophy, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joan Fowler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

PER CURIAM.

On November 2, 1989, we sua sponte issued an order withdrawing our October 25, 1989, opinion in this cause. The substituted opinion follows.

We grant the public defender’s Anders motion to withdraw. We agree that the designated judicial acts are wholly frivolous and without merit. The public defender has complied with the requirements set forth in Anders and recently addressed by the supreme court in Forrester. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); Order of the First District Court of Appeal Regarding Brief Filed in Forrester v. State, 556 So.2d 1114 (Fla.1990). We affirm the conviction and sentence and grant the public defender’s motion to withdraw.

GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and POLEN, JJ., concur.