Case ID: njl_128/html/0318-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ELEANOR J. KLINGEL, ADMX., ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. THE TOWN OF BLOOMFIELD, APPELLANT.
    Argued February 4, 1942 —
    Decided April 23, 1942.
    For the respondents, Coult-, Batz, Tomlinson & Morse.
    
    For the appellant, Edward G. Peltit.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Donges, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 7.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Parker, Bodine, Colie, Wells, JJ. 5.