Case ID: a3d_180/html/0367-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SLICE OF LIFE, LLC and Val Kleyman, Respondents v. HAMILTON TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD and Hamilton Township, Petitioners
    No. 604 MAL 2017
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    February 21, 2018
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of February, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the Commonwealth Court disregarded the binding precedent of this Court, set forth in the case Albert v. Zoning Hearing Board of North Abington Township, 578 Pa. 439, 854 A.2d 401 (2004), by finding that the purely transient use of a property as part of a commercial short-term vacation rental business was a permitted use in a residential zoning district?