Case ID: so2d_447/html/0383-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Arnold CLARK, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Edward N. MOORE, as Judge of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, in and for Dade County, Respondent.
    No. 84-118.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 13, 1984.
    Rehearing Denied April 10, 1984.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Karen M. Gottlieb and Bruce Rosen-thal, Asst. Public Defenders, for petitioner.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Richard E. Doran, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
    Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and FERGUSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Based on the controlling authority of Healey v. State, 389 So.2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), we grant the petition for a writ of prohibition herein and direct that the respondent trial judge grant the petitioner’s motion for discharge filed below. As the respondent, through counsel, concedes, Healey is factually indistinguishable from the instant case and compels the result we reach today. We will withhold issuance of a formal writ of prohibition as we are confident that the respondent will discharge the petitioner upon receipt of this opinion.

Prohibition granted.