Case ID: ga-app_37/html/0022-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

18089.
    Beaudry v. National Bank of Wilkes.
    Appeal and Error, 4 C. J. p. 852, n. 56.
    Trial, 38 Cyc. p. 1779, n. 75.
    Decided June 14, 1927.
    Complaint; from Fulton superior court—Judge Humphries. February 22, 1927.
    
      Alston, Alston, Foster & Moise, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Clement E. Sutton, Anderson, Rountree & Crenshaw, contra.
   Bloodworth, J.

1. When the excerpt from the charge, of which complaint is made in the motion -for a new trial, is considered in connection with the full instructions given to the jury, it shows no reason why a new trial should be granted.

■ 2. The evidence is ample to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Lulce, J., concur.