Case ID: cust-ct_3/html/0389-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 42139.
    Protests 983924, etc., of Bloomingdale Bros. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of •embroidered motifs, galloons, trimmings, bands, and laces similar to that the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and Normandy lace articles like those passed upon in United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A., 353, C. A. D. 40). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.