Case ID: or_128/html/0176-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued January 16,
    affirmed January 22, 1929.
    C. C. BROWER v. A. L. LEAVITT.
    (273 Pac. 721.)
    For appellant there was a brief over the name of Mr. W. E. A. Benner, with an oral argument by Mr. G. G. Brower.
    
    For respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Mr. Wm. Ganong.
    
   PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing the complaint after a demurrer to his second amended complaint had been sustained. Defendant did not appear in the oral argument presented to this court. We have carefully considered the second amended complaint and the argument advanced by plaintiff in his own behalf orally and find that the complaint does not state a cause of action. We concur with the opinion of the learned Circuit Court in this, that the alleged libelous article does not cast any reflection on plaintiff.

For that reason the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.