Case ID: nys_125/html/1149-12.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. McLennan, P. J., and WILLIAMS, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WEIDMAN, Appellant, v. KINZLY, Respondent.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    October 19, 1910.)
    Action by Edward Weidman, an infant, by guardian ad litem, against Frank Kinzly.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the court erred in charging the jury as matter of law that the defendant was justified in arresting the plaintiff and taking him into custody.

McLennan, P. J., and WILLIAMS, J.,

dissent upon the ground that there was a misunderstanding between the court and counsel, and upon the disagreement occurring the court then left to the jury the question of plaintiff’s right to recover.