Case ID: ohio-st-3d_30/html/0045-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Slanco, Appellant, v. Bannon, Judge, et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as Slanco v. Bannon (1987), 30 Ohio St. 3d 45.]
    (No. 86-41
    Decided April 15, 1987.)
    
      
      Michael Slanco, pro se.
    
    
      Tim Tusek, assistant prosecuting attorney, for appellees.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the court of appeals dismissing appellant’s complaint is hereby affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion and journal entry of said court of December 12, 1985.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.