Case ID: f-appx_441/html/0142-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Christopher F. GOAD, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William R. GRAY, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 11-1171.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 28, 2011.
    Decided: Aug. 1, 2011.
    Christopher Fred Goad, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
    Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher F. Goad, Sr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action for lack of diversity jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Goad v. Gray, No. 3:10-cv-00326-REP, 2010 WL 4735816 (E.D.Va. Nov. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.