Case ID: misc_163/html/0366-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph Morkel, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Appellant.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    November 29, 1934.
    
      Tanner, Sillcocks & Friend, for the appellant.
    
      R. John Urevich, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We think the provision against assignment of the policy was plain and unambiguous, and must be enforced as written. (Sacks v. Neptune Meter Co., 144 Misc. 70; affd., 238 App. Div. 82; Heffernan v. Prudential Insurance Co., 88 Misc. 93.)

Judgment and order reversed, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event, and motion denied.

All concur. Present — Lydon, Hammer and Shientag, JJ.