Case ID: f-appx_444/html/0658-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kwame GYAMFI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS-FARGO-WACHOVIA BANK; Wells Fargo Bank, Corp., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 11-1116.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 25, 2011.
    Decided: Aug. 29, 2011.
    
      Kwame Gyamfi, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Gaumont, Womble Carlyle San-dridge & Rice, PLLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    
    
      
       The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2006).
    
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kwame Gyamfi appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a default judgment, denying reconsideration of that order, and dismissing his claims filed under the Bank Secrecy Act, the United States Patriot Act, and the Right to Financial Privacy Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gyamfi v. Wells-Fargo-Wachovia Bank, No. 8:09-cv-03001-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 8, 2010, June 15, 2010, Dec. 14, 2010, & Jan. 31, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.