Case ID: f-appx_478/html/0771-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roxanne Kimarie ECKLES, a/k/a Sld Dft 5:05CR9-4-V, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 12-7125.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 7, 2012.
    Decided: Sept. 17, 2012.
    Roxanne Kimarie Eckles, Appellant Pro Se. William A. Brafford, Assistant United States Attorney, Thomas A. O’Malley, Maria Kathleen Vento, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Jill Westmoreland Rose, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before KEENAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roxanne Kimarie Eckles appeals the district court’s order denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Eckles’ motion for a transcript at government expense and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Eckles, No. 5:05-er-00009-RLV-DCK-4 (W.D.N.C. June 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.