Case ID: va-cir_33/html/0103-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "By Judge Jane Marum Roush", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY
    Sana Al-Homoud v. Alexandra James
    November 15, 1993
    Case No. (Law) 125619
   By Judge Jane Marum Roush

This matter came on to be heard on November 12, 1993, on the plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment. Mr. Weed, counsel for the defendant, did not appear.

The defendant was served by posting on September 24, 1993. Accordingly, the defendant had twenty-one days in which to answer the suit or otherwise file “responsive pleadings” within the meaning of the rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia.

On October 18, 1993, the defendant filed a counterclaim. Other than the counterclaim, the defendant has filed no pleadings with this court. The plaintiff moved for a judgment by default.

The sole issue before the court is whether a counterclaim is a “pleading in response” within the meaning of Rule 3:5. In addition, the court has considered whether a counterclaim is “plead[ing] to a notice of motion for judgment” under Rule 3:17.

The court has considered the matter and concludes that a counterclaim is not a responsive pleading within the meaning of the cited rules. Therefore, the defendant is in default.