Case ID: f-appx_531/html/0527-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Oswaldo RAMOS-MURRILLO, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 12-40829
    Summary Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    June 25, 2013.
    Paula Camille Offenhauser, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Molly Estelle Odom, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before WIENER, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Defendant-Appellant Oswaldo Ramos-Murrillo (Ramos) appeals the 46-month sentence imposed following his conviction for illegal reentry. He contends that the district court erred in enhancing his sentence for a crime of violence under United States Sentencing Guidelines § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) based on his Texas conviction under Texas Penal Code § 22.021 for aggravated sexual assault of a child under 14. He also contends that the district court erred by refusing to award a three-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility under United States Sentencing Guidelines § 3El.l(b) based on the government’s failure to move for the reduction because he refused to waive his right of appeal.

Ramos’s contentions are foreclosed by our decisions in United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 562 n. 28 (5th Cir.2013) (en banc), and United States v. Newson, 515 F.3d 374, 376-79 (5th Cir.2008).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.