Case ID: dc_1/html/0080-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Curry v. Lovell.
    It is no bar to execution upon a supersedeas in Washington county, that the plaintiff has recovered another judgment in Alexandria county upon the same cause of action, if it be not satisfied.
    Bule to show cause why this execution should not be quashed.
   Curry recovered judgment against Lovell before B. More, a justice of the peace for Washington county, on the 26th of August, 1801. Lovell obtained a supersedeas under the Act of Assembly of Maryland, until the 26th of February, 1802, and in the mean time removed to Alexandria county. When the super-sedeas had expired, the plaintiff obtained a new warrant from a justice of the peace in Alexandria county, and recovered judgment and took out execution theye which was not satisfied, Lovell having removed back to this county. The plaintiff then took out the present execution on the supersedeas here. Buie discharged.