Case ID: f-appx_332/html/0927-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph Kenneth NEWBOLD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 09-6304.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 29, 2009.
    Decided: Oct. 5, 2009.
    Joseph Kenneth Newbold, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Kenneth Newbold, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Newbold v. Stansberry, No. 1:08-cv-01266-LO-JFA, 2009 WL 86740 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 12, 2009; entered Jan. 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.