Case ID: nj-eq_89/html/0587-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William R. Ross, respondent, v. Eleanor J. Ross, appellant.
    [Decided October 11th, 1918.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, whose opinion is reported ante p. 261.
    
    
      Messrs. Queen & Stout, for the respondent.
    
      Mr. J. Emil Walscheid, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

We concur in the view of the vice-chancellor that the proofs submitted fully justify the conclusion that the respondent was entitled to the relief sought by him in this case. The decree 'of divorce which the appellant seeks to review will be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 12.

For reversal — None.