Case ID: f-appx_1/html/0196-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kyle G. MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 00-4437.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Dec. 8, 2000.
    Decided Jan. 11, 2001.
    Mary Lou Newberger, Acting Federal Public Defender, Edward H. Weis, First Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, WV, for appellant. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, John L. File, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, WV, for appellee.
    Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
   OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Kyle G. Mitchell appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and distribution of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 846 (West 2000). Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

On appeal, Mitchell contends that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Ap-prendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), requires that his conviction and sentence be vacated. Because Mitchell’s sentence of 135 months’ imprisonment and five years’ supervised release does not exceed the twenty-year statutory maximum term of imprisonment or unspecified maximum term of supervised release set out in 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(b)(1)(C) (West 1999) for the core offense without enhancement for drug quantity, we find that his sentence is permissible under Apprendi See United States v. Angle, 230 F.3d 113 (4th Cir. 2000); United States v. Aguayo-Delgado, 220 F.3d 926, 933 (8th Cir.), cert, denied'— U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 600, 148 L.Ed.2d 518 (2000). Accordingly, we affirm Mitchell’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.