Case ID: so2d_446/html/1118-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

G.W., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 83-666.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Feb. 28, 1984.
    Rehearing Denied April 4, 1984.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Robert Kalter, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The final judgment of delinquency is affirmed upon a holding that the trial court properly denied the motion to suppress the out-of-court and in-court identification of the juvenile herein filed below. There was substantial, competent evidence presented at the hearing on the motion to suppress— although this evidence was in part contradicted — to support the conclusion that the police did not employ an unnecessarily suggestive procedure in obtaining the out-of-court identification in this case, to wit: a prompt, fair, on-the-scene show-up identification of a purse snatch suspect. See Grant v. State, 390 So.2d 341 (Fla.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 913, 101 S.Ct. 1987, 68 L.Ed.2d 303 (1981).

Affirmed.