Case ID: f-appx_615/html/0808-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harald SCHMIDT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steven HUNSBERGER; John Burk, Defendants-Appellees, and Michael Burke, Defendant.
    No. 15-1340.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 31, 2015.
    Decided: Sept. 11, 2015.
    Harald Schmidt, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Notz, County Attorney’s Office, Prince William, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Harald Schmidt appeals the district court’s orders consolidating his cases against Officers Steven Hunsberger and John Burk and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaints against the officers. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See A/S J. Ludwig Mowinckles Rederi v. Tidewater Constr. Corp., 559 F.2d 928, 933 (4th Cir.1977) (identifying district court’s broad discretion in consolidation issues); United States v. Buckner, 473 F.3d 551, 554-55 (4th Cir.2007) (discussing apparent authority to consent to search). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.