Case ID: f-appx_55/html/0468-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose RAMOS-ESCOBAR, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-50385.
    D.C. No. CR-01-02966-JMF.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 13, 2003.
    
    Decided Jan. 22, 2003.
    Before BEEZER, KLEINFELD and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jose Ramos-Escobar appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for harmless error whether the district court denied Ramos-Escobar the right of allocution. United States v. Leasure, 122 F.3d 837, 840 (9th Cir.1997). We affirm.

Ramos-Escobar’s contention that he was denied the right of allocution lacks merit because the record shows that he was provided an opportunity to address the district court before it imposed sentence. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3); Leasure, 122 F.3d at 840 (stating “that Rule 32 may be satisfied by allowing a defendant an opportunity to make a statement before the end of sentencing but after the court has indicated its tentative conclusions on sentencing”).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.