Case ID: njl_100/html/0177-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HACKENSACK WATER COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS ET AL., APPELLANTS.
    Argued March 6, 1924
    Decided April 17, 1924.
    On appeal from the ¡Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 98 N. -7. L. 41.
    For the respondent, Collins cG Coi bin and Thomas Brown.
    
    For the appellant, William B. Stuhr, Jr.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ciuee Justice* Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbacil Campbell. Lloyd, "White, Gardner, Van Buskihk, Clark, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Kone.