Case ID: f-appx_242/html/0908-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re: Rayford KNIGHT, a/k/a Cherokee, a/k/a Chief, Petitioner.
    No. 07-4202.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 21, 2007.
    Decided: June 27, 2007.
    Rayford Knight, Petitioner Pro Se.
    
      Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Rayford Knight petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for return of property. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court has denied the motion. Accordingly, because the district court has ruled on Knight’s motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.