Case ID: sc_278/html/0571-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David Lamar GODLEY, Respondent, v. UNIROYAL INC., General Motors Corporation and Sweat Pontiac-Buick-GMC-IMP, Inc., Defendants, of whom General Motors Corporation and Sweat Pontiac-Buick-GMC-IMP, Inc., are Appellants.
    (300 S. E. (2d) 78)
    
      Ladson F. Howell, of Howell, Barnes, Bowers & Gibson, Beaufort, and Richard B. Watson, of Nelson, Mullins, Grier & Scarborough, Columbia, for appellants.
    
    
      J. Robert Peters, Jr., of Peters, Murdaugh, Parker, Eltzroth & Detrick, Hampton, for respondent.
    
    
      Wade H. Logan, III, of Holmes, Thomson, Logan & Cantrell, Charleston, for defendants.
    
    
      Jan. 17, 1983.
   ORDER

This matter is currently before the Court on respondent’s motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellants appealed from a circuit court order denying their motion for a change of venue.

It is generally held that an order granting or refusing a change of venue is interlocutory and therefore not immediately appealable. See 4 C. J. S. Appeal & Error § 115(a) (1957). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed without prejudice.

This order is to be published with the opinions of this Court.