Case ID: f-appx_91/html/0275-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jody M. BOWER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Jo Anne BARNHART, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 03-2230.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 27, 2004.
    Decided: March 24, 2004.
    
      Jody M. Bower, Appellant pro se.
    James Anthony Winn, Assistant Regional Counsel, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia; David Fallon Chermol, Office of the General Counsel, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.
    Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Jody M. Bower appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision denying Social Security Disability (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits. We must uphold the district court’s disability determination if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir.1996). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bower v. Barnhart, No. CA-02-147-2 (W.D.Va. Aug. 13, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED 
      
       The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).