Case ID: ohio-st_95/html/0403-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "By the Court.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The Hocking Valley Railway Co. v. The Public Utilities Commission et al.
    
      Continuation of railzvay service — Objection to order of utilities commission — Time of operation not sufficient for determination of court.
    
    (No. 15256
    Decided December 12, 1916.)
    Error to the Public Utilities Commission.
    
      Messrs. Wilson & Rector, for plaintiff in error.
    
      Mr. Edward C. Turner, attorney general; Mr. Freeman T. Eagleson and Mr. E. E. Eubanks, for defendants in error.
   By the Court.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the order of the said public utilities commission be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; for the reason the court finds that it is disclosed by the record that sufficient time had not elapsed after the former order of this court to sufficiently inform the court touching the different claims of the parties in the premises. And this court does not pass upon the other questions involved nor preclude itself from passing on any state of facts which might be shown concerning the disputed matters covering' a longer and sufficient period of time.

Order affirmed.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Wanamaker, Newman, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.