Case ID: a3d_187/html/0122-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the MATTER OF Frank N. TOBOLSKY, an Attorney At Law (Attorney No. 015051987)
    D-98 September Term 2017 080848
    Supreme Court of New Jersey.
    June 15, 2018
    ORDER
   The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 17-329, recommending that FRANK N. TOBOLSKY formerly of MERCHANT VILLE

, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, be disbarred for violating RPC 1.15(a) (knowing misappropriation of escrow funds), RPC 1.15(c) (failure to hold property of the clients or third persons in the lawyer's possession separate from the lawyer's own property), RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and the principles of In re Hollendonner, 102 N.J. 21, 504 A.2d 1174 (1985).

And FRANK N. TOBOLSKY having failed to appear on the Order directing him to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that FRANK N. TOBOLSKY be disbarred, effective immediately, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys;

ORDERED that FRANK N. TOBOLSKY be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing or hereinafter deposited in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by FRANK N. TOBOLSKY pursuant to Rule 1:21-6 be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause shown, and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that FRANK N. TOBOLSKY comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.