Case ID: ill-app_163/html/0429-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Smith", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Minnie H. Barton, Defendant in Error, v. James E. Keelyn, Plaintiff in Error.
    Gen. No. 15,771.
    Municipal Court—when statement of facts properly stricken. A statement of facts not filed within thirty days of the judgment date or within such further time as may have been provided by order entered within such time, is properly stricken.
    Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. McKenzie Cleland, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1909.
    Affirmed.
    Opinion filed October 5, 1911.
    Church & Sherburne, for plaintiff in error.
    Mayer, Meyer, Austrian & Platt, for defendant in error.
   Mr. Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

A judgment was entered in this, a fourth class case, in the Municipal Court of Chicago June 11, 1909.

Within thirty days thereafter, on July 8th, an order was entered on the stipulation of the parties that the time to file a bill of exceptions be extended to include July 24, 1909. On July 23rd another order was entered on the stipulation of the parties that the time to file a bill of exceptions be extended to include August 9, 1909. On August 9th a correct stenographic report of the proceedings at the trial was signed and filed.

On this writ of error the defendant in error moves the court to strike from the record said stenographic report because same was not filed within the first extension of time as provided by the statute. Under the authority of Lassers v. North German Steamship Co., 244 Ill. 570; Haines v. Danderine Co., 248 Ill. 259; Lakeside Fish & Oyster Co. v. Mutual Fish Co., 155 Ill. App. 681; Devine, Adm’r. v. Prudential Ins. Co., 156 Ill. App. 477, the motion is allowed.

No error appearing in the record as it remains the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.