Case ID: so2d_209/html/0701-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Van Lester McKINZY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 67-722.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    April 30, 1968.
    Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender and Jeffrey Michael Cohen, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    
      Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen. and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from appellant’s conviction after a non-jury trial upon the charge of assault with intent to commit robbery. The appellant argues that the evidence as to identity contained in the trial record is unclear and is insufficient to identify him as the person who assaulted the complaining witness. Our review of the record convinces us that this argument is without basis. See Wright v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 264.

Affirmed.