Case ID: a3d_180/html/0365-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Shakir BERRYHILL, Petitioner
    No. 439 EAL 2017
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    January 30, 2018
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did not the Superior Court panel err in reversing the trial court's dismissal of the case pursuant to Rule 600 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure where the panel instantly failed to apply this Court's holding in Commonwealth v. Mills, 162 A.3d 323 (Pa. 2017) that time attributable to the normal progression of a case is not delay excludable from calculations under Rule 600?