Case ID: sw3d_456/html/0545-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jacqueline T: PITTMAN, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent.
    No. ED 100881
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    
    Filed: March 10, 2015
    Michael E. Reid, 205 S. Main Street, Suite B, Edwardsville, IL 62025, For Appellant.
    Rachel M. Jones, P.O. Box 475, 301 W, High Street, Jefferson City, MO 65105, For Respondent.
    Before Sherri'B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jacqueline T. Pittman appeals from the trial court’s judgment upholding the administrative revocation of her driving privileges for refusing to submit to a chemical analysis of her breath under Missouri’s Implied Consent Law, Section 577.020 RSMo 2006. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the trial court was supported by substantial evidence, was not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law. Velluto v. Dir. of Revenue, 383 S.W.3d 14, 17 (Mo. App. E.D. 2012). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).