Case ID: f-appx_697/html/0789-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edgar THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The State of SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 17-1876
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: September 26, 2017
    Decided: September 28, 2017
    Edgar Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edgar Thomas appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to dismiss Thomas’ civil action without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and its order denying Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. South Carolina, No. 3:17-cv-01345-CMC (D.S.C. June 27 & July 19, 2017); see also Robinson v. Wix Filtration Corp., 599 F.3d 403, 407 (4th Cir. 2010) (reviewing Rule 59(e) denial for abuse- of discretion). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED