Case ID: ohio-law-abs_4/html/0739-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 937
    SCHICK v. CINCINNATI (City) Imbus v. Same and Hull v. Same
    Nos. 20022-23-24.
    Supreme Court
    On motion to certify.
    Dock. July 29, 1926;
    4 Abs. 525.
    291. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — Are ordinances and resolutions of the City of Cincinnati in relation to referendum unconstitutional under 4227-2-3 GC?
    Attorneys — W. J. Schick for plaintiffs herein; E. F. Alexander and C. S. Bell for City; all of Cincinnati.
   _ The question herein involved is a constitutional one relating to the interpretation of 4227-2-3 GC. relative to ordinances and resolutions that are subject to referendum.