Case ID: a3d_191/html/0613-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the MATTER OF Stephen F. JUMAN, an Attorney At Law (Attorney No. 240441967)
    D-141 September Term 2017 081235
    Supreme Court of New Jersey.
    August 2, 2018
    CORRECTED ORDER
    This matter have been duly presented pursuant to Rule 1:20-10(b), following the granting of a motion for discipline by consent in DRB 18-082, of STEPHEN F. JUMAN, formerly of EDISON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1967;
    And the District VIII Ethics Committee and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent violated RPC 1.5(b) (failure to communicate to the client in writing, the basis or rate of the fee);
    And the parties having agreed that respondent's conduct violated RPC 1.5(b), and that said conduct warrants an admonition or lesser discipline;)
    And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined because respondent's misconduct was de minimus, and that no discipline need be imposed;
    And the Disciplinary Review Board having submitted the record of the proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an order in accordance with Rule 1:20-16(e);
    And good cause appearing;
    It is ORDERED that no discipline be imposed on STEPHEN F. JUMAN, formerly of EDISON.