Case ID: so2d_649/html/0351-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNIVERSAL PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC., Appellant, v. AMERITEK ENGINEERING SERVICE, INC., Appellee.
    No. 94-2418.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Feb. 8, 1995.
    George, Hartz, Lundeen, Flagg & Fulmer and Esther E. Galicia, Coral Gables, for appellant.
    Kneski & .Kneski and Peter Kneski, Miami, for appellee.
    Before HUBBART, BASKIN and LEVY, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from is affirmed. The said affirmance is without prejudice to the appellant seeking to have an evidentiary hearing as suggested by the trial court. See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. National Bank of Melbourne & Trust Co., 238 So.2d 665 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970).

Affirmed.