Case ID: sw2d_943/html/0308-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Martin J. GUENTHER, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. 70660.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    April 8, 1997.
    Frank A. Anzalone, Clayton, for defen-danVappellant.
    John A. Ross, County Counselor, Jacqui De Laet Skoglund, Assistant County Counselor, St. Louis County, Clayton, for plain-tifffrespondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after his conviction following a bench trial of one count of violating a municipal assault ordinance. The court ordered him to pay a $400 fine. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).