Case ID: njl_105/html/0492-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

REBECCA KOPLIN, APPELLANT, v. VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Argued October 25, 1928
    Decided February 4, 1929.
    For the appellant, Feit & Feit.
    
    For the respondent, Biker & Biker.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — JThe Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Yan Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.