Case ID: pa_601/html/0383-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

973 A.2d 412
    Thomas MASTROCOLA, Chris & Michelle Hammel, h/w and Michelle McDonald and Wardlaw & Joyce Hall, h/w and John & Peggy Weston, h/w, Petitioners v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Respondent.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    June 1, 2009.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to the following issues:

1. Is federal preemption based upon choice-of-law preemption a waivable defense?

2. Are Petitioners’ claims in this suit preempted, or are they preserved from preemption by the clarifying amendment to FRSA at 49 U.S.C. § 20106(b)?