Case ID: sw_161/html/0118-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PRENDERGAST, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ARRISMAN v. STATE.
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    Nov. 19, 1913.
    Rehearing Denied Dec. 10, 1913.)
    Criminal Law (§ 1102) — Statement oe Eacts.
    A purported statement of facts, not filed in the trial court until six months after adjournment, cannot be considered on a criminal appeal, and will be stricken.
    [Ed. Note. — For .other cases, see Criminal Law, Dec. Dig. §1102.]
    Appeal from District Court, Wichita County; P. A. Martin, Judge.
    Will Arrisman was convicted of robbery, and appeals.
    Affirmed.
    T. E. Hunter, of Wichita Falls, for appellant. C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
    
      
      For Other oases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key-No. Series & Rep’r Indexes
    
   PRENDERGAST, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of robbery, and his punishment fixed at the lowest prescribed by law. What purports to be a very short statement of facts in the case was not filed in the court below until six months after the adjournment of the court, and, of course, cannot be considered on this appeal, and is struck out on the motion of the Assistant Attorney General. There is nothing attempted to be raised by appellant which we can consider in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment will be affirmed.