Case ID: sw3d_333/html/0543-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Donald JORDAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 95154.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    March 15, 2011.
    Gwenda R. Robinson, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., P.J., MARY K HOFF, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald Jordan (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant asserts that the motion court clearly erred in denying Movant’s claim that his plea to felony resisting arrest lacked sufficient factual basis.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).