Case ID: ga-app_28/html/0672-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Luke, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

13484.
    Curles v. The State.
    Decided June 14, 1922.
    Indictment for manufacture of liquor; from Mitchell superior court — Judge E. C. Bell. January 14, 1922.
    
      E. E. Cox, for plaintiff in error.
    
      B. C. Gardner, solicitor-general, Billie B. Bush, C. E. Crow, contra.
   Luke, J.

The sole assignment of error is upon the ground that the evi-

does not authorize the defendant’s conviction. Upon conflicting evidence the jury were authorized to return a verdict of guilty against the defendant. This verdict having the approval of the trial judge, the judgment denying the motion for a new trial can not be interfered with. -Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.