Case ID: fla_97/html/0372-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Woods Cones, Appellant, v. John P. Hendry, Ethel D. Hendry and John H. Treadwell, Appellees.
    
    En Banc.
    Decision filed March 19, 1929.
    
      Leitner & Leitner, for Appellant;
    
      Treadwell & Treadwell, for Appellees.
   Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. See Brett v. First National Bank, decided at the present term.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.