Case ID: njl_108/html/0189-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROSA E. GERSTLEY, RESPONDENT, v. DAVID H. BEST ET AL., APPELLANTS.
    Submitted February 13, 1931
    Decided October 19, 1931.
    For the respondent, Cassman & Gottlieb.
    
    For the appellants, Babcock & Champion.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.