Case ID: f-appx_568/html/0520-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hanan ALI Mohamed Ali, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 10-72751.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 10, 2014.
    
    Filed April 14, 2014.
    Saad Ahmad, Fremont, CA, for Petitioner.
    Jennifer R. Khouri, Oil, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
    
      Before: SILVERMAN, W. FLETCHER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Hanan Ali Mohamed Ali, a native and citizen of Eritrea, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) decision denying as untimely her motion to reopen. We review the BIA’s decision for abuse of discretion. Najma-badi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir.2010). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Ali’s motion to reopen in its entirety because it was filed five years after the BIA’s final decision, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and it did not fall within the ehanged-circumstances exception to the ninety-day time limit on motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(e)(3)(ii). Ali’s evidence did not show that conditions in Eritrea changed materially after her 2003 hearing, so the exception did not apply with respect to any of Ali’s claims. See Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 987-89.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.