Case ID: f_59/html/0476-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE EXPRESS. THE N. B. STARBUCK. THE CHARM. NEW YORK & CUBA MAIL STEAMSHIP CO. v. THE EXPRESS, THE N. B. STARBUCK, and THE CHARM.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    December 13, 1892.)
    No. 38.
    Interest — Affirmance of Decree.
    . A party who appeals from a decree in ‘his favor in a collision case is not entitled to interest on the original recovery pending the appeal.
    Motion to Amend Mandate.
    Denied.
    For report of the decision on the appeal, see 3 C. C. A. 342, 52 Fed. 890.
   PER CURIAM.

The party who appeals from a decree in his favor in a cause of collision is not entitled to interest on the original recovery pending the appeal. Interest, in such cases, is given for delay in satisfying a decree. The party wrho appeals puts it out of the power of the opposite party to pay the decree. The Rebecca Clyde, 12 Blatchf. 403; Hemmenway v. Fisher, 20 How. 260; The Blenheim, 18 Fed. 47.

The motion to amend the mandate is denied.