Case ID: nys_152/html/1117-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HEDGES, Respondent, v. PIONEER IRON WORKS, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
    April 23, 1915.)
    Action by Dayton Hedges against the Pioneer Iron Works.
   PER CURIAM.

Without determining whether the amended complaint is sufficient in law, we think that plaintiff should be permitted to serve the same. As terms of the amendment, defendant is entitled to receive its full taxable costs and disbursements of the action to date. Whether the sum allowed ($100) is equal to these or not, we are not in a position to determine. Defendant may, at its election, either receive,, as terms of the amendment, such taxable costs and disbursements, but without any extra allowance, or the sum allowed by the learned justice at Special Term. The order, as thus modified, is affirmed, without costs. See, also, 151 N. Y. Supp. 495.