Case ID: njl_76/html/0574-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DAVID WOLFF, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. MAUD M. MEYER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
    Argued March 5, 1908
    Decided June 15, 1908.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 46 Vroom 181.
    Por the plaintiff in error, John A. Kiernan and Glarence D. Meyer.
    
    Por the defendant in error, Sanmel Koestler.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Bogeet, Yredenburgh, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 10.

For reversal—Yooehees, Yeoom, J.J. 2.