Case ID: so2d_653/html/1145-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Sheldon GLOVER, Appellee.
    No. 94-1628.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 3, 1995.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Stephanie G. Kolman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Sally M. Richardson, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.
    Before GERSTEN, GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Based upon the record before us, we find that there is no basis to disturb the trial court’s findings and ruling on the motion to suppress. Owen v. State, 560 So.2d 207, 211 (Fla.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 855, 111 S.Ct. 152, 112 L.Ed.2d 118 (1990) (citing McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410, 412 (Fla.1978): “The ruling of the trial court on a motion to suppress comes to us clothed with a presumption of correctness and we must interpret the evidence and reasonable inference and deductions in a manner most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s ruling.”).

Affirmed.