Case ID: so2d_806/html/0446-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert J. REARDON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. SC00-1395.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    Jan. 3, 2002.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and John M. Selden, Assistant Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, FL, for Petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Kellie A. Nielan, Denise 0. Simpson, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, FL, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision in State v. Reardon, 763 So.2d 418 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), based on alleged express and direct conflict with Thompson v. State, 650 So.2d 969 (Fla.1994), Goodwin v. State, 634 So.2d 157 (Fla.1994), and Sirmons v. State, 634 So.2d 153 (Fla.1994). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.