Case ID: so2d_620/html/1256-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sheryl DYKSTRA-GULICK, Petitioner, v. Douglas GULICK, Respondent.
    No. 80486.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    June 24, 1993.
    Dock A. Blanchard of Blanchard, Merriam, Adel & Kirkland, P.A., Ocala, for petitioner.
    Anthony J. Salzman and Ernest J. Myers of Moody, Salzman & Robertson, Gaines-ville, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We have for review Dykstra-Gulick v. Gulick, 604 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), which certified a question of great public importance recently answered by our opinion in Waite v. Waite, 618 So.2d 1360 (Fla.1993). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. The decision below is quashed, and this cause is remanded for reconsideration in light of Waite.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.