Case ID: f-appx_140/html/0924-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Lee FOREMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 03-14815.
    D.C. Docket No. 02-00017-CR-FTM-29-DNF.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    Aug. 9, 2005.
    Yvette Rhodes Harrison, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Cloud H. Miller, III, Miller & Associates, Decatur, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and ALARCON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       Honorable Arthur L. Alarcon, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See 11th Cir. R. 36-1. 
      
      . 11th Cir. R. 36-1 provides:
      When the court determines that any of the following circumstances exist:
      (a) judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous;
      (b) the evidence in support of a jury verdict is sufficient;
      (c) the order of an administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole;
      (d) summary judgment, directed verdict, or judgment on the pleadings is supported by the record;
      (e) judgment has been entered without a reversible error of law; and an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment or order may be affirmed or enforced without opinion.