Case ID: ad3d_82/html/0781-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brett Archer, Appellant.
    [917 NYS2d 901]
   The defendant’s contention that improper remarks made by the prosecutor in summation deprived him of a fair trial is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bey, 71 AD3d 1156 [2010]). In any event, the challenged remarks were proper because they constituted fair comment upon the evidence or fair response to the defense summation, or otherwise remained within the “broad bounds of rhetorical comment permissible in closing argument” (People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396, 399 [1981]; see People v Cass, 79 AD3d 768 [2010]; People v Perez, 77 AD3d 974 [2010]; People v Bey, 71 AD3d 1156 [2010]; People v Dorgan, 42 AD3d 505 [2007]).

The failure of the defendant’s attorney to object to the prosecutor’s summation did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel because counsel need not make an argument that has little or no chance of success (see People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277, 287 [2004]; People v James, 72 AD3d 844 [2010]). The defendant was afforded meaningful representation (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708 [1998]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 [1981]). Mastro, J.E, Skelos, Eng and Sgroi, JJ., concur.