Case ID: njl_52/html/0222-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THE STATE, CAROLINE M. DARCY, PROSECUTRIX, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. HENRY G. DARCY ET AL., DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For opinion of the Supreme Court, see 22 Vroom 140.
    For the plaintiff in error, Robt. H. McCarter.
    
    For the defendant in error, Joseph Coult.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed,, for the reasons given by that court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Knapp, Magie, Yan Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, McGregor, Smith, Whitaker. 13.

For reversal—None.