Case ID: sw2d_980/html/0059-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edward BARRY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    Nos. 72778, 72779.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Sept. 15, 1998.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 6,1998.
    Application for Transfer Denied Dec. 22, 1998.
    
      David C. Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before SIMON, P.J., and CRANE and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Edward Barry, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).