Case ID: so2d_484/html/0636-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jose PRIETO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 84-1306.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 11, 1986.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Debora J. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    
      Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and NESBITT, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

While we have no doubt that the challenged testimony concerning the alleged reason the defendant was a suspect in the instant case was erroneously admitted and was not, as claimed, justified by any previously admitted evidence, we affirm on the conclusion that, considering the entire record, the incident was harmless.

Affirmed.