Case ID: serg-rawl_4/html/0081-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Girard against Hutchinson. Same against same.
    Monday, March 30.
    THE arbitrators to whom both these causes were submit-, ted, under the act of 20th March, 1810, met forty-two times, and charged for forty-two days, spent in the investigation of each case. But the Court decided that they were only enti- ,,, . , _ ,, it* tied to be paid for forty-two day’s service m the whole, viz. twenty-one in each case. '
    _ It appeared that the matter of the two causes was intermixed, and that the arbitrators might have decided either of them separately, in much less than forty-two days.
    if two causes between the same parties and decided by the same arbitrators at the e’ntitied to be paid ^ spent*hi investigation ofboth cases; and cannot make a distinct charge for each case.