Case ID: sw2d_737/html/0472-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Darnell DUCKETT, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 52542.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Aug. 4, 1987.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied Oct. 6, 1987.
    Holly Simons, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for respondent.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for movant.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the trial court's denial of his Rule 27.26 motion to vacate judgment and sentence. We find no error and that the decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence. A written opinion would serve no precedential value. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

All judges concur.