Case ID: f2d_11/html/1009-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Albert HOROWITZ and Rudolph Newschaffer, plaintiffs in error, v. UNITED STATES, defendant in error.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    May 3, 1926.)
    No. 391.
    In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
    Leonard A. Snitkin, of New York City (Leo H. Klugherz, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs in error.
    Emory R. Buckner, U. S. Atty., of New York City (John M. Harlan and Robert B. Watts, Asst. U. S. Attys., both of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.
    Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed.