Case ID: sw3d_92/html/0323-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Tyrie POWELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 81179.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    Dec. 17, 2002.
    Gwenda R. Robinson, Assistant State Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Patrick T. Morgan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, C.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J, and LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Tyrie Powell, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.085 motion without an evidentiary hearing. He contends the prosecutor committed misconduct by showing favoritism to the State’s witness.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum for their use only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).