Case ID: f-appx_279/html/0238-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel MELLINGER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mr. BAUKNECHT; United States Parole Commission, Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 08-6061.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 29, 2008.
    Decided: May 30, 2008.
    Daniel Mellinger, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Daniel Mellinger appeals a district court order granting Respondents’ motion for summary judgment on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mellinger v. Bauknecht, No. 0:06-cv-03441-RBH, 2007 WL 4276415 (D.S.C. Nov. 29, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.