Case ID: f-appx_169/html/0777-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Frank MOORE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BUNCOMBE COUNTY; Kate Dreher, Assistant District Attorney, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 05-7611.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 23, 2006.
    Decided March 3, 2006.
    Frank Moore, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Frank Moore appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action and motion for a temporary restraining order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Moore v. Buncombe County, No CA-05-294-1 (W-D.N.C. Sept. 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED