Case ID: f_87/html/1004-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HAWLEY, District Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CALIFORNIA REDWOOD CO. v. LITLE.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    May 3, 1898.)
    No. 403.
    Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.
    Page, McCutchen & Eells, for appellant. Barclay Henley and S. V. Costello, for appellee.
    Before GILBERT and ROSS, Circuit Judges, and HAWLEY, District Judge.
   HAWLEY, District Judge.

This case presents substantially the same questions that were involved in Mortgage Co. v. Hopper, 12 C. C. A. 293, 64 Fed. 553, 559. We are asked to review the question relative to the rights of bona fide purchasers, for value, before the issuance of a patent. We adhere to the views expressed upon this point in the Hopper Case, repeated and followed by this court in Diller v. Hawley, 26 C. C. A. 514, 81 Fed. 651, 655; and, upon the principles therein announced, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs.