Case ID: ny-st-rep_59/html/0890-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People, Resp’t, v. William A. McDowell, App’lt.
    Motion to amend decision so as to certify that the reversal was upon questions of'law only, etc.
   Per Curiam.

It' is true that the new trial in -this case was granted upon the law; hut we cannot certify that upon the facts we would affirm the conviction, for the reason that tye think the evidence establishes, or that the jury might have found as facts, that the board of excise granted the defendant a license, that the commissioners of excise, composing the board, were one a de jure and the other a de facto officer, and that the defendant applied * to such board for a license in good faith, believing the persons composing it to be de jure officers.