Case ID: ny-super-ct_52/html/0563-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Opinion Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles W. Romeyn, respondent, v. Daniel E. Sickles, appellant.
    Decided October 5, 1885.
    Appeal from a judgment entered upon the report of a referee. Action to recover for services as architect in preparing plans, &c.
    Daniel P. Hays, for appellant. Theron G-. Strong, for respondent.
    Before Freedman and Truax, JJ.
   Opinion Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion delivered by the referee.