Case ID: f2d_496/html/0531-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charlie Albert YOUNG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. W. J. ESTELLE, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 74-1146.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    June 26, 1974.
    James H. Randals, Staff Counsel for Inmates, Tex. Dept. of Corrections, Huntsville, Tex., for petitioner-appellant.
    
      Max P. Flusche, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondent-appellee.
    Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and RIVES and DYER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the briefs and oral arguments in this appeal, we conclude that the record developed in the state post-conviction proceedings was insufficient to support the denial of federal habeas corpus relief without a hearing. Therefore the judgment of the district court is vacated and the cause remanded with directions to hold an evidentiary hearing.

Vacated and remanded with directions.