Case ID: tex-crim_109/html/0660-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MARTIN, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Paul Selvey et al. v. The State.
    No. 11689.
    Delivered May 23, 1928.
    Forfeiture of Appearance Bond — Failure to File Brief — Appeal Dismissed.
    An appeal from a judgment forfeiting an appearance bond is governed by the rule obtaining in civil cases, and provided in Art. 866, C. C. P., which is as follows: “In cases provided for in the two preceding articles the proceedings shall be regulated by the same rules that govern in civil actions when an appeal is taken, or a writ of error sued out.” Appellant having failed to file a brief in the trial court, this appeal, on motion of the state for that reason is dismissed. See Vernon’s C. C. P., Vol. 3, pp. 311-312; also Art. 2283, R. C. S., 1925.
    
      Appeal from the District Court of Nacogdoches County. Tried below before the Hon. C. A. Hodges, Judge.
    Appeal from a judgment of forfeiture on an appearance bond. Dismissed.
    The opinion states the case.
    
      Adams & McAlister of Nacogdoches, for appellant.
    A. A. Dawson of Canton, State’s Attorney, for the State.
   MARTIN, Judge.

Final judgment was rendered in the District Court of Nacogdoches County on October 25, 1927, against Paul Selvey, as principal, and C. C. Peters and W. C. Blackmon, as sureties, on an appearance bond, from which judgment appellants have prosecuted an appeal to this court.

Art. 866, C. C. P., provides as follows:

“In the cases provided for in the two preceding articles, the proceedings shall be regulated by the same rules that govern civil actions where an appeal is taken or a writ of error sued out.”

The State’s Attorney has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal and it appears that no brief was filed in the trial court, nor is there any waiver of said filing shown to have been made by the attorneys for appellee. Since, this appehl is governed by the rules obtaining in civil cases, the motion must be sustained. See authorities cited in Vernon’s C. C. P., Vol. 3, pp. 311-312; also Art. 2283, R. C. S. (1925), and Bratton et al. v. State, 4 S. W. (2nd) 562, and authorities there collated.

Under the terms of the statute and the authorities supra, this appeal must be dismissed and it is accordingly so ordered.

Appeal dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the- Court.