Case ID: sw2d_764/html/0120-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rudolph CHRISTENSEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 40541.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Dec. 20, 1988.
    Motion for Rehearing to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 31, 1989.
    Rudolph H. Christensen, Jefferson City, pro se.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.
    Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and TURNAGE and COVINGTON, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

From an evidentiary hearing denying his Rule 27.26 (now repealed) motion, the mov-ant appeals. His claims of insufficiency of the information, fatal variance between information and verdict director, ineffective assistance of counsel, use of perjured testimony, insufficiency of the evidence, and the trial court’s failure to make requisite findings and conclusions are all denied. Rule 84.16(b).