Case ID: f-appx_193/html/0671-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Clive Milton WILSON, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 04-50449.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted July 24, 2006.
    
    Decided July 27, 2006.
    Jason M. Otha, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Michael Berg, Esq., Law Offices of Michael S. Berg, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: ABARCÓN, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Wilson’s Februaiy 6, 2006, motion for argument is denied.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Clive Milton Wilson appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release and imposing a 21-month sentence. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir.1999) (stating that a defendant lacks standing to challenge a completed sentence); see also Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 14, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998) (holding that revocation of parole does not create collateral consequences sufficient to extend standing beyond expiration of sentence and rejecting as moot a challenge to an allegedly erroneous parole revocation).

Wilson’s motion to dismiss is denied as moot.

The appeal is DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.