Case ID: f-appx_439/html/0232-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marilyn CROWLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PINEBROOK, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 10-2398.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 12, 2011.
    Decided: July 21, 2011.
    
      Marilyn Crowley, Appellant Pro Se. Heidi Elizabeth Dudderar, Law Offices of Heidi E. Dudderar, PC, California, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Marilyn Crowley appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment and denying her claim that her employment was terminated in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e-2000e-17 (West Supp.2010) and the Jury System Improvement Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1875 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Crowley v. Pinebrook, Inc., No. 8:08-cv-03427-JKS, 2010 WL 4963004 (D.Md. Dec. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).