Case ID: so2d_907/html/0688-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Tyrone BRANTLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D03-3522.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    July 29, 2005.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Archie F. Gardner, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Carolyn M. Snurkowski and Aisha Chaney, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the denial of a motion to suppress, after which he entered a nolo plea. Because the plea was entered without reserving any issue for appeal, the ruling which the appellant challenges is not reviewable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(2). The appellant’s convictions are therefore affirmed.

ALLEN, WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur.