Case ID: sw3d_400/html/0868-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cynthia A. BRINKER, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 98911.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    June 11, 2013.
    Kevin Albert Richardson, Washington, MO, for appellant.
    Rachel M. Jones, Missouri Department of Revenue, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J„ and LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cynthia A. Blinker (Blinker) appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion for summary judgment following the trial court’s judgment sustaining the Director of the Department of Revenue’s (Director) suspension of Brinker’s driving privileges for driving while under the influence of alcohol. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).