Case ID: f-appx_428/html/0254-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Russell E. LAMBERT, Petitioner, v. FRANK ARNOLD CONTRACTORS, INCORPORATED; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, Respondents.
    No. 10-2150.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: March 29, 2011.
    Decided: May 5, 2011.
    
      Russell E. Lambert, Petitioner Pro Se. Paul Edwin Frampton, Bowles, Rice, McDavid, Graff & Love, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia; Sarah Marie Hurley, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
    Before KEENAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Russell E. Lambert seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2006). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Lambert v. Frank Arnold, Contractors, Inc., No. 09-0658-BLA (B.R.B. May 14 & Sept. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.