Case ID: ga_95/html/0539-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kennedy v. Brand.
    Lumpkin, J. — Under the plain and unequivocal mandate of section 4203 of the code, when exceptions to the report of an auditor are submitted to a jury, they must return a verdict on each exception seriatim. Accordingly, where divers exceptions to an auditor’s report were thus submitted, a verdict in these words, “We, the jury, find to sustain the auditor’s report,” was contrary to law, and must be set aside.
    December 21,1894.
    Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Judge Clark. Rockdale superior court. April term, 1894.
    J. N. Glenn, for plaintiff in error.
    J. R. Irwin, contra.
    
   Judgment reversed,.