Case ID: f-appx_72/html/0730-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Antonio L. GOMEZ; et al., Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 03-15425. D.C. No. CV-02-00381-JMR.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 11, 2003.
    
    Decided Aug. 21, 2003.
    Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, HAWKINS and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Antonio L. Gomez and Brenda L. Gomez appeal pro se the district court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of their tax refund lawsuit against the United States.

The district court correctly determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over appellants’ action, because they failed to fully prepay the amount of taxes assessed to them. 26 U.S.C. § 7422(a); 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1); Latch v. United States, 842 F.2d 1031, 1033 (9th Cir.1988).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.