Case ID: ohio-st-3d_74/html/0635-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Toledo Bar Association v. Rust.
    [Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Rust (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 635.]
    (No. 95-2128
    Submitted December 6, 1995
    Decided February 28, 1996.)
    
      
      Joseph L. Wittenberg; Paul D. Giha; Frank W. Cubboh, Jr. & Associates and Guy T. Barone, for relator.
    
      Marshall & Melhom and Richard M. Kerger, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings of misconduct, but we consider public reprimand a sufficient sanction. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for his violations of DR 5-105(A) and (B) and 9-102(A). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Wright, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Douglas and Resnick, JJ., not participating.