Case ID: ny-2d_21/html/0794-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent-Appellant, v. Robert Moll, Appellant, and William Stanbridge and John Closter, Appellants-Respondents.
    Submitted January 15, 1968;
    decided February 14, 1968.
   Motion by appellant Stanbridge to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein of appellant William Stanbridge, there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether appellant’s right to due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment had been adversely affected and whether appellant’s conviction was based in part on unlawful search and seizure in violation of his rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Court of Appeals held that there was no violation of appellant’s constitutional rights under either of these amendments. [See 21 N Y 2d 706.]