Case ID: johns_12/html/0340-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anonymous.
    a judgment *dmpart,Vand part™ebut in such case no costs are alther tide" 61
    IN this case, on á writ of error; the judgment of the court below had been.reversed in part, and affirmed in part, and the only question was as to the costs.
   Per Curiam.

There is no doubt that a judgment may be reversed in part, and affirmed in part, But the statute speaks only of the entire affirmance or reversal of a judgment. (1 N. R. L. 346. sess. 36. c. 96. sec. 13.) We think that Ho costs, in this case, are to be allowed on either side. 
      
      
         Smith v. Jansen, 8 Johns. Rep. 111. S. P. 558.