Case ID: f-appx_340/html/0851-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Adrian Y. JACKSON, Defendant—Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Adrian Y. Jackson, Defendant—Appellant.
    Nos. 09-6685, 09-6686.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Aug. 5, 2009.
    Decided: Aug. 12, 2009.
    Christopher Cary Fialko, Rudolf, Wid-enhouse & Fialko, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Ashe-ville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before MICHAEL, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Adrian Y. Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jackson, Nos. 3:04-cr-00191-MR-DCK-5; 3:05-cr-00103-RJC-DCK-1 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.