Case ID: so2d_559/html/1217-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles L. YOUNG, Petitioner, v. Walter COLBATH, et al., Respondents.
    No. 90-0622.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    March 21, 1990.
    Rehearing Denied April 12, 1990.
    Charles L. Young, West Palm Beach, pro se.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Patricia G. Lampert, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

By order dated March 9, 1990, this court determined that the pleading filed by petitioner, entitled petition for writ of prohibition, should be treated as a petition for writ of mandamus. Now upon further consideration of the pro se petition, as amended, and the response, we are of the opinion that correctly the petition should be denominated as petition for writ of prohibition and, accordingly, that part of the order dated March 9, 1990, providing otherwise is hereby rescinded.

The amended petition of writ of prohibition is

DENIED.

DOWNEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.