Case ID: sw3d_72/html/0222-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jeffrey HOBBS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 80171.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    April 2, 2002.
    Nancy L. Vincent, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Nicole E. Gorovsky, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J. and MARY R. RUSSELL, J. and MARY •K. HOFF, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Jeffrey Hobbs, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s decision is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only, which sets forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).