Case ID: f-appx_676/html/0197-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jitendrakumar Jagubhai PATEL, Petitioner, v. Jeff SESSIONS, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 16-1858
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: January 20, 2017
    Decided: February 10, 2017
    Gene S. Devore, Law Offices of Gene S. Devore, P.A., West Palm Beach, Florida, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, Sarah A. Byrd, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
   Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jitendrakumar Jagubhai Patel, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and Patel’s claims, and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2016); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Patel (B.I.A. June 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED