Case ID: ny-super-ct_60/html/0501-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eliza L. Hinschberger, Respondent v. The Manhattan Railway Company, et al., Appellants.
    Decided March 14, 1892.
    Appeal by defendants from judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon decision of a judge at special term.
    Davies & Rapallo, attorneys, and Joseph E. Lord of counsel, for appellants. Peck-ham & Tyler, attorneys, and Charles A. B. Pratt, Jr. of counsel, for respondent.
    Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., Dugro and Gildersleeve, JJ.
   Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.