Case ID: f-appx_416/html/0275-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Penny K. YOHE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee, and Social Security Administration, Party-in-Interest.
    No. 10-1448.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 23, 2011.
    Decided: March 14, 2011.
    
      Timothy F. Cogan, Cassidy Myers Cogan & Voegelin, L.C., Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellant. Eric Kressman, Regional Chief Counsel, Maija Pelly, Acting Supervisory Attorney, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Betsy C. Jividen, United States Attorney, Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Nicole A. Schmid, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Penny K. Yohe appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment and affirming the decision of the Commissioner to deny Yohe supplemental security income benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yohe v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 5:09-cv-00075-FPS-JES, 2010 WL 1417960 (N.D.W.Va. Apr. 6, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.