Case ID: f-appx_94/html/0632-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

INLAND MEDIATION BOARD, INC.; et al., Plaintiffs—Appellees, v. CITY OF POMONA; et al., Defendants, and Wilfred Keagy, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 02-55923.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 4, 2004.
    
    Decided April 13, 2004.
    Michael S. Evans, Esq., Christopher Brancart, Esq., Brancart & Brancart, Pescadero, CA, John S. Ward, Esq., Law Offices of John S. Ward, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
    David D. Lawrence, Esq., Franscell, Strickland, Roberts & Lawrence, Glendale, CA, for Defendants.
    Barry R. Levy, Esq., Tracy L. Turner, Horvitz & Levy LLP, Encino, CA, Paul R. Ayers, Esq., Law Offices of Michael Thomas, Glendale, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: KLEINFELD, WARDLAW, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   ORDER

As both parties agree that the district court’s order barring Keagy from raising the defense of qualified immunity was improper and should be vacated, the order granting plaintiffs’ “Motion in Limine re Qualified Immunity” (dist. ct. docket no. 266, pp. 4-6) is hereby vacated. If the case proceeds to trial, Keagy is entitled to raise qualified immunity as a merits-level defense to liability. We express no opinion concerning whether the qualified immunity defense should be decided by the court as a matter of law or by the jury, as the issue is not before us.

ORDER VACATED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.