Case ID: how-pr_4/html/0367-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Reuben Mattison, plaintiff in error, vs. Daniel Baucus, defendant in error.
    
      —Judgment affirmed.
    
    T. C. Ripley, for plaintiff in error;
    J. Pierson, for defendant in error.
   This was a question as to the interest of a mortgagor in personal property. That his interest, even before forfeiture, where he has not the right of possession for a definite period, is not the subject of levy and sale upon execution. (Reported, 1 Comstock 295.)