Case ID: sw3d_22/html/0760-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Susan STUCKENSCHNEIDER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Reginald TAYLOR, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. ED 76538.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    July 25, 2000.
    William James O’Herin, Florissant, for appellant.
    Lewis C. Green, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr. J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Susan Stuckenschneider (Plaintiff) appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of Reginald Taylor (Defendant) in a personal injury lawsuit. Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in permitting defense counsel to argue the comparative fault of her husband. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the parties’ briefs and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).