Case ID: sw3d_241/html/0454-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kenneth W. ASKEW, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. WD 67114.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Dec. 26, 2007.
    Frederick J. Ernst, Esq., Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
    Shaun J. Mackelprang, Esq., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before NEWTON, P.J., SPINDEN and HARDWICK, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Askew appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, following an evi-dentiary hearing. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our de- . cisión, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).