Case ID: sw2d_883/html/0577-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Howard HARRIS, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. 64056.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Sept. 20, 1994.
    S. Paige Canfield, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jennifer A. Glancy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and CRAHAN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted in a jury-waived case, in Cause No. 921-3237, for possession of a controlled substance. § 195.202, RSMo Supp.1993. He was sentenced to a term of three years. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).