Case ID: cust-ct_48/html/0410-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Johnson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 66684.
    Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States,
    protests 58/20062 and 58/22428 (New York).
   Oxiinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic artificial teeth similar in all material respects to those the subject of Air Express Int'l Agency, Inc., et al. v. United States (46 Cust. Ct. 163, C.D. 2251), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.