Case ID: so2d_184/html/0423-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHEMSTRAND CORPORATION and Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., Petitioners, v. Dorothy SKIPPER et al., Respondents.
    No. 34993.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    March 23, 1966.
    J. Nixon Daniel, Jr., and Beggs, Lane, Daniel, Gaines & Davis, Pensacola, for petitioners.
    Joseph Q. Tarbuck, Pensacola, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.
   PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 18, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The attorney for the respondent is hereby awarded a fee in the amount of $250.00 for services in this Court.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.