Case ID: misc_141/html/0874-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Pauline Zysman, Appellant, v. Jacob Zysman, Respondent.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    December 5, 1930.
    
      Herman Scheckner, for the appellant.
    
      Panken & Levy, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The Statute of Limitations did not commence to run until a demand was made (Brehm v. Mayor, etc., of New York, 104 N. Y. 186, 192; Wenman v. Mohawk Ins. Co., 13 Wend. 268) or should have been made (Sullivan v. Ellis, 219 Fed. 694; 37 C. J. 818; 1 Wood Lim. [4th ed.] § 125.) As a demand within the period of the Statute of Imputations was timely as a matter of law (Sullivan v. Ellis, supra), the motion to strike out the defense as insufficient should have been granted.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Frankenthaler, JJ.