Case ID: pa-super_221/html/0302-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Commonwealth v. Jaynes, Appellant.
    Argued April 11, 1972.
    Before Wright, P. J., Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, Cercone, and Packel, JJ.
    
      
      Zeno Fritz, for appellant.
    
      Henry A. Martin, Assistant District Attorney, with him John N. Scales, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
    June 15, 1972:
   Opinion

Per Curiam,

A new support hearing, stenographically reported, is necessary because the court below in violation of the Act of May 1, 1907, P. L. 135, §2, as amended, 17 P.S. §1802, had refused the request of counsel for the defendant-appellant that the testimony of the hearing be transcribed. Commonwealth ex rel. Hollinger v. Shaeffer, 196 Pa. Superior Ct. 301, 175 A. 2d 114 (1961). Remanded for a new hearing.