Case ID: misc2d_13/html/0447-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sue Healy, Respondent, v. H. K. Realty Corp., Appellant.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    June 19, 1958.
    
      Richard E. Bauman for appellant.
    
      Elliott A. Ferber for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

A motion for summary judgment pursuant to rule 113 is unavailable to the petitioner tenant in this summary proceeding. The statutory remedy may be utilized by a plaintiff or by a petitioner movant only if the cause of action falls within one of the nine subdivisions of the rule. (Feyh v. Brandtgen & Kluge, 283 App. Div. 807).

The final order in favor of the petitioner tenant should be reversed, with $10 costs to the appellant landlord, and motion for summary judgment denied.

The motion to dismiss the appeal should be denied, without costs.

Hofstadter, J. P., and Tilzer,, J., concur; Hecht, J., concurs in result.

Pinal order reversed, etc.