Case ID: ohio-st-3d_61/html/0076-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Stark County Bar Association v. Marchbank.
    [Cite as Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. Marchbank (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 76.]
    
      (No. 90-2540
    Submitted February 13, 1991
    Decided July 3, 1991.)
    
      
      Richard Reinbold and Frank DePasquale, for relator. James R. Gregg, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We agree that respondent violated DR 6-101(A)(3) as found by the board. We also agree that suspension with a conditioned probation is the appropriate sanction for respondent’s misconduct. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. However, the suspension will be stayed in favor of a two-year monitored probation period during which respondent must comply with the conditions imposed by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.