Case ID: ohio-st-3d_56/html/0058-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Giegel.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Giegel (1990), 56 Ohio St. 3d 58.]
    (No. 90-1125
    Submitted July 31, 1990
    Decided December 12, 1990.)
    
      
      J. Warren Bettis, disciplinary counsel, and Karen B. Hull, for relator Office of Disciplinary Counsel.
    
      John T. Jeandrevin and John C. Oberholtzer, for relator Medina County Bar Association.
    
      Charles W. Kettlewell, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We concur with the board’s findings and recommendations. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Moreover, the court admonishes respondent that in any application for reinstatement, the court will look for proof that respondent has resolved his alcohol abuse problems and made restitution to persons injured by his misconduct. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.