Case ID: pa_598/html/0498-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

957 A.2d 1176
    COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Blaine BALDWIN, Petitioner.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Sept. 25, 2008.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of September 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Should not this Court clarify the doctrine of sentencing merger, and its implications under constitutional double jeopardy analysis, under circumstances where the exact same set of facts satisfies the elements of two different offenses?