Case ID: f-appx_388/html/0918-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Milford VICKERS, a.k.a. Buddy, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-16063
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    July 22, 2010.
    Jonathan Wesley Dingus, Panama City, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Gayle Littleton, Panama City, FL, Nancy J. Hess, United States Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and COX, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Dingus, appointed counsel for Milford Vickers, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Vickers’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.