Case ID: a3d_81/html/0324-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Rosemary FOSTER, Respondent.
    No. 13-BG-981.
    District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
    Filed Dec. 19, 2013.
    Before McLEESE, Associate Judge, and TERRY and FARRELL, Senior Judges.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order of the Supreme Court of the State of Oregon that suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of thirty days with reinstatement conditioned on respondent taking the Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam (MPRE) and earning a scaled score of 85 or greater; this court’s September 18, 2013, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing her to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline; and it appearing that respondent failed to respond to this court’s order, but did file a D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit on October 5, 2013, it is

ORDERED that respondent Rosemary Foster is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of thirty days, nunc pro tunc to October 5, 2013, with reinstatement contingent on her taking the MPRE and earning a scaled score of 85 or greater. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) (re-buttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate).