Case ID: so2d_618/html/0204-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Steve Alan BAMBERG, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 80019.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    May 20, 1993.
    
      James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Jennifer Y. Fogle, Asst. Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, for petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Átty. Gen. and Carl R. Hayes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The decision of the district court of appeal, Bamberg v. State, 599 So.2d 769 (Fla.2d DCA 1992), which we review on the ground of conflict, art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const., is approved on the authority of McKnight v. State, 616 So.2d 31 (Fla.1993).

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.