Case ID: sw3d_295/html/0001-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY.
    No. 04-08-00388-CV.
    Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio.
    Aug. 20, 2008.
    Deborah A. Newman, Patrick W. Drouil-het, Newman, Favaloro & Troegel, Lynne Liberato, Kent Rutter, Haynes and Boone, L.L.P., Houston, TX, for Appellant.
    Darrin Walker, Law Office of Darrin Walker, Kingwood, TX, George L. Le-Grand, Stanley Bernstein, LeGrand & Bernstein, P.C., San Antonio, TX, Robert M. Tramuto, Jones, Granger, Tramuto, Christy & Halstead, Houston, TX, for Ap-pellee.
    Sitting: ALMA L. LÓPEZ, Chief Justice, PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice, STEVEN C. HILBIG, Justice.
   MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The court has considered relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus and the response of the real parties in interest and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a).