Case ID: so2d_916/html/0065-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Osmel ALVAREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D04-1028.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 14, 2005.
    Woodward & Reizenstein and Philip L. Reizenstein, Miami, for appellant.
    Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General and Douglas J. Glaid (Ft.Lauderdale), Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before LEVY and SHEPHERD, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

The order below, entered after an extensive evidentiary hearing, denied the appellant’s application for relief from a judgment affirmed in Alvarez v. State, 774 So.2d 802 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), review denied, 791 So.2d 1094 (Fla.2001), on grounds of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. That order is itself affirmed. See Florida v. Nixon, 543 U.S. 175, 125 S.Ct. 551, 160 L.Ed.2d 565 (2004); Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Affirmed.