Case ID: f-appx_267/html/0266-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Roger OSBORN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Cindy OSBORN, Defendant—Appellee.
    No. 07-7623.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Feb. 21, 2008.
    Decided: Feb. 27, 2008.
    Roger Osborn, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Roger Osborn appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint against Defendant for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Osborn v. Osborn, No. 8:07-cv-02305-AW (D. Md. filed Sept. 11, 2007; entered Sept. 12, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.