Case ID: okla_165/html/0210-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BUSBY, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DODSON et al. v. CORPORATION COMMISSION et al.
    No. 24131
    Sept. 12, 1933.
    Rehearing Denied Oct. 10, 1933.
    Ledbetter, Stuart, Bell & Ledbetter, for plaintiffs in error.
    E‘. S. Ratliff, for defendants in error.
   BUSBY, J.

This is a companion case to cause No. 24132, Oils Incorporated v. Corporation Commission et al., this date decided. (165 Okla. 202, 25 P. (2d) 703.) The same property is involved as well as the ame period of production. The cases differ only in that the plaintiffs in error in this case are owners of fractional interests in and to the % working interest covered by the lease of the producing property involved, whereas, in cause No. 24132 the plaintiff in error was the operator. The legal questions involved which are material to a determination of the issues are identical. The causes have been considered together in this court, and the ultimate rights of the parties in this case have been determined in accordance with the views expressed in the opinion in cause No. 24132.

The opinion in cause No. 24132 is therefore adopted as the opinion in this case, and this cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to proceed in a manner not inconsistent with the views announced.

RILEY, C. J., OÜLLISON, V. C. J., and SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, OSBORN, BAYLESS, and WELCH, JL, concur.