Case ID: nj-super_28/html/0329-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. ONEIDA MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM H. MERRITT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
    Argued November 16, 1953
    Decided November 23, 1953.
    Before Judges Eastwood, Jayne and Fsancis.
    
      Mr. Frank J. Gimino, Assistant County Prosecutor, argued the cause for the complainant-respondent (Mr. Frederick T. Law, County Prosecutor, attorney).
    
      Mr. Reuben P. Goldstein argued the cause for the defendants-appellants.
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Tenenbaum reported in 27 N. J. Super. 125 (Cty. Ct. 1953).