Case ID: ad2d_15/html/0743-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. Fred Muggs Associates, Inc., et al., Respondents, v. Richard Auerbach, Appellant.
   The complaint asks for judgment in favor of the plaintiff, declaring that the defendant has no copyright, proprietary or other interest in certain films referred to in the complaint. It also asks for a temporary and permanent injunction and for money damages. It is alleged in paragraph Eighth of the complaint that the defendant has asserted a ‘ copyright and proprietary interest ’ in the proposed series” of television shows and that as a result of such claim the plaintiffs “ have been unable to conclude agreements for the production, financing and distribution of this series.” However, there is no allegation that the defendant does not have such a copyright and proprietary interest. While the complaint does allege that the plaintiff is the “owner” of the proposed series of shows, such allegation is not the equivalent of an allegation that the defendant has no “ copyright or proprietary interest ” therein. Absent such an allegation the complaint must fall. Concur—'Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.