Case ID: sw2d_836/html/0097-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Craig PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. 61044.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Sept. 15, 1992.
    Jeannie Arterburn, St. Louis, for appellant.
    William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert Alan Kelly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The denial of Movant’s Rule 29.15 motion is affirmed. Movant has previously filed a Rule 27.26 motion. Furthermore, a Rule 29.15 motion may not be used to present newly discovered evidence.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value.

Affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).