Case ID: so3d_235/html/0969-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Leighdon HENRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Case No. 5D17-92
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Opinion filed November 3, 2017
    James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Nancy Ryan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
    Leighdon Henry, Malone, pro se.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.
   ON MOTION FOR REHEARING-

PER CURIAM.

We grant Leighdon Henry’s Motion for Rehearing, withdraw our earlier per cu-riam affirmance and substitute the following in its place.

As to Counts 1, 2, 3 and 5, the sentencing documents shall, on remand, be amended to reflect that Henry is entitled to a review of his- sentence after serving twenty years, not twenty years after the date of his initial sentencing. See § 921.1402(2)(d), Fla. Stat. (2014); Tyson v. State, 199 So.3d 1087, 1089 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.