Case ID: f-appx_708/html/0632-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose SOLIS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-15670 Non-Argument Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    (January 9, 2018)
    Steven E. Butler, Adam W. Overstreet, Kenyen Ray Brown, George F. May, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Jose Solis, Pro Se
    Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JULIE CARNES and HULL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Andrew M. Jones, appointed counsel for Jose Solis in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant- and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Solis’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.