Case ID: nj-super_4/html/0316-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DOROTHY BEVETT MANN AND MAISIE MOBLEY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. VICTOR SHELZI, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
    Argued June 13, 1949
    Decided July 1, 1949.
    
      Before Judges McGeehan, Donges and Colie.
    
      Mr. Hymen B. Mintz (Messrs. Mintz & Herships, attorneys) argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants.
    
      Mr. Nicholas Conover English (Messrs. McCarter, English & Studer, attorneys) argued the cause for the defendant-respondent.
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under appeal is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Hartshorne in the Essex County Court. In the construction of a similar statute in New York, the same result was reached. Gruber v. Wilson et al, 276 N. Y. 135, 11 N. E. 2d 568 (Court of Appeals 1937); 125 A. L. R. 457, 473.