Case ID: so2d_636/html/0202-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Freddie WIGGINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-3275.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    May 13, 1994.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Carl S. McGinnes, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and James W. Rogers, Sr. Asst. Deputy Atty. Gen., Dept, of Legal Affairs, Tallahassee, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to reconcile and correct discrepancies between the written judgment and sentence, the order of revocation, and the oral pronouncements at the revocation hearing. See Maddox v. State, 619 So.2d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Williams v. State, 604 So.2d 8 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

BOOTH, WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.