Case ID: nw2d_906/html/0911-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

2018 ND 38
    STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Romez Michael COLEMAN, Jr., Defendant and Appellant
    No. 20170315
    Supreme Court of North Dakota.
    Filed 2/22/2018
    Haley L. Wamstad, Assistant State’s Attorney, Grand Forks, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
    Russell J. Myhre, Valley City, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. ''
    
   Per Curiam.

[¶1] Romez Michael Coléman, Jr., appeals from a criminal judgment for aggravated assault—domestic violence. Coleman argues the State presented insufficient evidence to sustain the guilty verdict and the district court erred in allowing testimony about two physical objects that were subject to a stipulation and order restricting their admission into evidence. Sufficient evidence exists to sustain the criminal judgment, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting testimony about the objects. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). and (4).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jon J. Jensen

Jerod E. Tufte