Case ID: sw3d_549/html/0600-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "ELIZABETH KERR, JUSTICE", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SABRE TRAVEL INTERNATIONAL LTD., Appellant v. DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA AG, Austrian Airlines AG, Brussels Airlines NV/SA, and Swiss International Air Lines Ltd., Appellees
    NO. 02-17-00153-CV
    Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.
    DELIVERED: June 1, 2017
    Ralph H. Duggins, Philip A. Vickers, Cantey Hanger LLP, Fort Worth, TX, Steven J. Kaiser, Carl Lawrence Malm, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, Washington, DC, Chris Lind, Andrew C. MacNally, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, Chicago, Il, Karma M. Giulianelli, Jason C. Murray, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, Denver, CO, for Appellant.
    Roland K. Johnson, Harris Finley & Bogle, P.C., Fort Worth, TX, R. Paul Yetter, Christopher D. Porter, Richard B. Farrer, Wyatt J. Dowling, Yetter Coleman LLP, Houston, TX, for Appellees.
    PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; GABRIEL and KERR, JJ.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    
      
      See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
    
   ELIZABETH KERR, JUSTICE

Having considered Sabre Travel International Ltd.'s petition for permissive interlocutory appeal of the trial court's May 1, 2017 "Amended Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss," we deny the petition. 
      
      See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(d) (West Supp. 2016); see also Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(a), (f), (j) ; Tex. R. Civ. P. 168.
     
      
      See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(f) ; see also Blakenergy, Ltd. v. Oncor Elec. Delivery Co. , No. 02-14-00241-CV, 2014 WL 4771736, at *1 & n.2 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth Sept. 25, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op.) (stating that courts strictly construe the interlocutory appeals statute).