Case ID: so2d_104/html/0124-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lee WILSON, d/b/a Lee Wilson Company, Appellant, v. C. E. ROBINSON, Appellee.
    No. 57-474.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    July 3, 1958.
    Hudson, McNutt, Campbell, Isom & Reariclc, Miami, for appellant.
    Pruitt & Pruitt, Miami, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon the rule stated in American Mercantile Co. v. Circular Advertising Co., 71 Fla. 522, 71 So. 607, 608, to the effect that when testimony for a defendant was uncertain and not sufficient to sustain a verdict for the defendant, there was no error in directing a verdict for the plainjiff who successfully carried the burden of proof on the issues presented.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.