Case ID: fla_139/html/0327-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

R. R. Riley v. J. H. Corbett.
    190 So. 596
    Division A
    Opinion Filed July 18, 1939
    
      W. H. Wilson, Jr., for Plaintiff in Error;
    
      E. C. Rutledge, for Defendant in Error. ■
   Per Curiam.

This writ of error is to a final judgment in an action at law on a promissory note. There were two pleas to the declaration, viz.: (1) The note sued on was not the note of this defendant and (2) That he has heretofore discharged and settled plaintiff’s claim by payment. Evidence was taken and the trial court instructed the jury as to their verdict which was returned for the plaintiff and final judgment was entered.

We have examined the record and the briefs and find the judgment appealed from to be amply supported. No question is presented on which an opinion would serve any useful purpose. The judgment is free from error and is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Ti-iomas, J. J., concur.

Brown, J., concurs in opinion and judgment.

Justices Whitfield and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.