Case ID: f-appx_305/html/0438-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Guadalupe DIAZ-RAMOS, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 08-30051.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    
      Submitted Dec. 17, 2008.
    
    Filed Dec. 29, 2008.
    James P. Hagarty, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Nicholas W. Marchi, Carney & Marchi, PS, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: GOODWIN, TROTT, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jose Guadalupe Diaz-Ramos appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Diaz-Ramos was indicted for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the district court erred when it denied his motion to dismiss because he was previously deported under an incorrect alien number which invalidated his prior deportation. Because Diaz-Ramos did not suffer prejudice as a result of being deported under an incorrect number, his contention fails. See United States v. Muro-Inclan, 249 F.3d 1180, 1185 (9th Cir.2001).

AFFIRMED. 
      
      
         This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.