Case ID: md_234/html/0536-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PLUCKETT, Etc. v. STATE
    [No. 308,
    September Term, 1963.]
    
      Decided May 4, 1964.
    
    
      The cause was submitted to Brune, C. J., and Hammond, Prescott, Marbury and Sybert, JJ.
    Submitted on brief by /. Joseph Curran, Jr., for the appellant.
    Submitted on brief by Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General, Robert F. Sweeney, Assistant Attorney General, William J. O’Donnell, State’s Attorney for Baltimore City, and Stanley Cohen, Assistant State’s Attorney, for the appellee.
   Per Curiam.

This appeal is devoid of merit. Appellant says the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction of robbery, because of his identification only by the prosecuting witness. This witness, at the trial, positively identified appellant as the offender, without equivocation. This was sufficient to warrant the conviction if believed, as it evidently was, by the trier of facts (the court). Appellant also makes a mild suggestion that his identification by the prosecuting witness in a lineup was made under unfair conditions. A careful examination reveals no such unfairness.

Judgment affirmed.