Case ID: nj-eq_122/html/0005-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Harry Burack, complainant-appellant, v. Pauline Mayers, executrix of the estate of Edward Mayers, deceased, defendant-respondent.
    [Submitted February 2d, 1937.
    Decided April 30th, 1937.]
    
      Messrs. Avidan ■& Avidan {Mr. Spaulding Frazer and Mr. Alexander Avidan, of counsel), for the appellant.
    
      Messrs. Hannoch Lasser {Mr. Herbert J. Hannoch and Mr. William S. Myers, of counsel), for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a decree dismissing the bill of complaint. We have examined with care the record and conclude that it entirely justified the decree made and the decree will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Persicie. Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.