Case ID: ny_137/html/0605-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam mem.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Annie I. Dawson, as Trustee, etc., Respondent, v. John D. Parsons, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
    (Argued February 27, 1893;
    decided March 14, 1893.)
    Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, made Eovember 22, 1892, which affirmed two orders of the Special Term, the last of which appointed a receiver of the assets of the firm of Weed, Parsons & Company.
    The following is the mem. handed down herein:
    “ The court at Special Term had power and jurisdiction upon the facts appearing to appoint the receiver, and its order made in the exercise of its discretion, is not reviewable here.
    
      “ The appeal should be dismissed, with costs.”
    
      Matthew Hale and Charles J. Buchanan for appellant.
    
      Edward J. Meegan and Jacob H. Clute for respondent.
   Per Curiam mem.

for dismissal of appeal.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.