Case ID: f-appx_670/html/0780-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph B. LAMBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MECKLENBURG COUNTY; Dena Diorio; Chris Peek, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 16-1755
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: November 17, 2016
    Decided: November 21, 2016
    Joseph B. Lambert, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Rainey, Womble Carlyle San-dridge & Rice, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph B. Lambert appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss and denying Lambert’s motion to amend his complaint as futile. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lambert v. Mecklenburg Cty., No. 3:15—cv-00577-GCM, 2016 WL 3176593 (W.D.N.C. June 2, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

■ AFFIRMED