Case ID: ny_211/html/0509-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alfred Cossman, Appellant, v. Chenango Silk Company, Respondent.
    
      Cossman v. Chenango Silk Co., 150 App. Div. 895,' affirmed.'
    (Argued March 25, 1914;
    decided April 14, 1914.)
    Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered April 12, 1912, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered , upon a verdict in an action to recover for an alleged breach, of contract.
    
      
      Henry B. Twombly and Edmonds Putney for appellant.
    
      Harvey D. Hinman for respondent.
   Judgment affirmed, with costs; r£o opinion.

Concur: Willakd Bartlett, Oh. J., Werner, Chase, Collin, Ouddebaok, Hogan and Cardozo, JJ.