Case ID: f-appx_64/html/0411-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Charles NORTON, Defendant-Appellant, and Cynthia K. Norton, Claimant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Charles Norton, Defendant-Appellant, and Cynthia K. Norton, Claimant.
    Nos. 03-1336, 03-1394.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted May 29, 2003.
    Decided June 3, 2003.
    Richard Charles Norton, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Sharon Burham, Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM:

Richard Charles Norton appeals the district court’s order denying is motion for an evidentiary hearing and a subsequent order entering a stay of judgment pending appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Norton, No. 99-78 (W.D.Va. Jan. 31, 2003 & Mar. 21, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.