Case ID: njl_116/html/0143-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOE BRUNO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. TURNER & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Submitted October 25, 1935 —
    Decided January 31, 1936.
    
      For the appellant, Wall, Haight, Carey & Hartpence.
    
    For the respondent, Henry Harris.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance■ — -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.