Case ID: or-app_51/html/0289-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted February 27,
    affirmed March 16, 1981
    STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. BRIAN MITCHELL CHASE, Appellant.
    
    (No. B58-682, CA 19117)
    624 P2d 1100
    H. Thomas Andersen, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
    Karen H. Green, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, John R. McCulloch, Jr., Solicitor General, and William F. Gary, Deputy Solicitor General, Salem.
    Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Warren, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Defendant’s sole assignment of error is that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel and due process of law in violation of the Oregon and United States Constitutions. As we noted in State v. Robinson, 25 Or App 675, 550 P2d 758 (1976), that question can be properly resolved only in a post conviction proceeding (ORS 138.510 - 138.680) in which evidence can be adduced at a hearing. Although we indicated in Robinson, as well as in subsequent cases (e.g., State v. Henley, 31 Or App 109, 569 P2d 58 (1977)), that there may be rare instances where this issue may be raised on direct appellate review, we have been cited to no such case in which we found that rare instance; we conclude that this case is not one of them, and do not consider the question.

Affirmed.