Case ID: ohio-st-3d_93/html/0189-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Lundberg Stratton, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State ex rel. Hobart Corporation/PMI Food Equipment Group, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as State ex rel. Hobart Corp./PMI Food Equip. Group v. Indus. Comm. (2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 189.]
    (No. 01-256
    Submitted July 17, 2001
    Decided September 19, 2001.)
    
      Baran, Piper, Tarkowsky, Fitzgerald & Theis Co., L.P.A, and John Tarkowsky, for appellant.
    
      Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jeffrey B. Hartranft, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.
    
      Philip J. Fulton & Associates and William A. Thorman III, for appellee Douglas E. Moerch.
   The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I dissent and would grant the requested writ of mandamus and return the matter to the Industrial Commission for reconsideration. Therefore, I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.