Case ID: njl_84/html/0764-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ANNIE SAWYER ET AL., ADMINISTRATORS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. EDWARD I. EDWARDS, COMPTROLLER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    Argued March 4, 1913
    Decided June 18, 1913.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    For the plaintiffs in error, Edward A. Day (Edward A. & William T. Day on the brief).
    
      For the defendant in error, Edmund Wilson, attorney-general (Theodore Backes on the brief).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion in Carr v. Edwards, ante p. 667.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Garrison, Sivayze, Trbnghard, Parker, Yoorhees, Kalisck, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Congdon, White, Tertiunb, Hberenheimee, JJ. 14.

Fo r rev ersa l — FT one.