Case ID: ad_239/html/0764-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rochester Trust and Safe Deposit Company, Respondent, v. Herbert J. Stull, Appellant, and Other Defendants.
    
    
      
       Affd., 264 N. Y.
    
   Judgment affirmed, with costs. Finding of fact contained in defendant Stull’s request No. 5 disapproved and reversed as without evidence to support it. (See New York Life Ins. Co. v. Casey, 178 N. Y. 381; Rafel v. Maurer, 101 Misc. 621; affd., 183 App. Div. 931; York City & County Banking Co. v. Bainbridge, 43 L. T. Rep. [N. S.] 732; Schroyer v. Thompson, 262 Penn. St. 282; Claiborne v. Birge, 42 Tex. 98.) All concur, except Thompson, J., who dissents and votes for reversal of the judgment as to the appellant Stull, on the law.