Case ID: f-appx_260/html/0598-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Tajinder SINGH, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 07-1538.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 19, 2007.
    Decided: Jan. 7, 2008.
    Martin Avila Robles, San Francisco, California, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Aviva L. Poczter, Senior Litigation Counsel, Vanessa O. Lefort, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Tajinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying as untimely his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion in the Board’s order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2007) (“The decision to grant or deny a motion to reopen ... is within the discretion of the Board.... ”); Barry v. Gonzales, 445 F.3d 741, 744 (4th Cir.2006) (stating abuse of discretion standard), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 1147, 166 L.Ed.2d 997 (2007). We therefore deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Singh, No. [ AXX-XXXXXX ] (B.I.A. May 8, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.