Case ID: thomp-cook_5/html/0675-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Davis, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bartlett v. McNeil.
    Bupp~ementa~ry proeeeth,n93.
    Supplementary proceedings (Code, § 293) are not authorized in a judgment not in personam.
    
    Appeal by plaintiff, Charles W. Bartlett, from an order at the special term, allowing an amendment to the judgment-roll; also from an order denying a motion that the court fix a time for defendant, Alexander McNeil, to appear and be examined in supplementary proceedings.
    
      John H. Bergen, for appellant.
    
      Beebe, Wilcox & Hobbs, for respondent.
   Davis, P. J.

The onfy point of interest passed upon is fully set forth in the head-note.

Orders affirmed.