Case ID: misc_32/html/0777-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Isaac D. Zeeman et al., Respondents, v. Joseph Rosenthal, Appellant.
    Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York in favor of plaintiffs.
    Louis Levy, for appellant.
    Max D. Steuer (Abraham S. Levy, of counsel), for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The promise of defendant was not a promise to answer for the debt or default of another. It was an original promise. It was not necessary that it should have been in writing.

We think that no error was committed, and the judgment must he affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, Ch. J., Conlan and Hascall, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.