Case ID: pa-super_81/html/0215-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Pittsburgh & Allegheny Telephone Co. v. Stinson Printing Co., Appellant.
    
      Practice, Superior Court — Appeals — Divided court — Affirmance of lower court.
    
    Where the appellant court is equally divided the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed.
    Argued April 23, 1923.
    Appeal, No. 3, April T., 1923, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny County, Jan. T., 1922, No. 2424, in favor of plaintiff in the case of Pittsburgh & Allegheny Telephone Company v. Stinson Printing Company.
    Before Porter, Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn and Gawthrop, JJ.
    Affirmed.
    Assumpsit to recover charges for telephone service. Before McFarlane, J., without a jury.
    
      The court entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Defendant appealed.
    
      Error assigned was the order of the court.
    
      C. F. C. Arensberg, of Patterson, Crawford, Miller & Arensberg, for appellant.
    
      John O. Wicks, of Weller & Wicks, with them C. L. Wallace, for appellee.
    July 12, 1923:
   Per Curiam,

The six judges who sat at the argument of this case being equally divided in opinion, the judgment is affirmed.