Case ID: cust-ct_4/html/0762-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, Judge:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sardo Lace Co. v. United States
    No. 4839.
    Entry No. 29718, etc.
    Invoices dated Shanghai, China, March 30, 1939, etc.
    Certified April 3, 1939, etc.
    Entered at New York May 12, 1939, etc.
    (Decided March 29, 1940)
    
      Lane & Wallace for the plaintiff.
    
      Webster J. Oliver, Assistant Attorney General (Daniel 1. Auster, special attorney), for the defendant.
   Tilson, Judge:

Counsel for the respective parties have submitted for decision the appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, upon an agreed statement of facts to the effect that the price or market value at the dates of exportation of the instant merchandise at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of China, for export to the United States, in usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including all costs, charges, and expenses specified in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, are the appraised values, less any amount added under duress.

On the agreed facts and the law applicable thereto I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by these appeals to be the values found by the appraiser, less any amount added under duress. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.