Case ID: so2d_741/html/0637-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael A. MUSTO, Appellant, v. BELL SOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, a Georgia corporation, and Recovery Specialists, Inc., Appellees.
    No. 98-1729.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Sept. 29, 1999.
    Donald P. Kohl of Donald P. Kohl, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Michele L. McNichol of Katz, Barron, Squitero, Faust & Berman, P.A., Miami, for appellees.
   ON APPELLEES’ MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellees’ motion for certification and certify the following question to be of great public importance:

IN DETERMINING WHEN THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS BEGINS TO RUN ON THE COMMON LAW TORT OF CREDIT SLANDER, SHOULD COURTS APPLY THE “SINGLE PUBLICATION RULE” AT ISSUE IN WAGNER, NUGENT, JOHNSON, ROTH, ROMANO, ERIK- SON & KUPFER, P.A. v. FLANAGAN, 629 So.2d 113 (Fla.1993), OR THE “MULTIPLE PUBLICATION RULE?”

DELL, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.