Case ID: ad3d_154/html/0881-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Merrick McDermott, Appellant.
    [62 NYS3d 278]
   — Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), imposed September 23, 2014, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Given the defendant’s limited education, reported illiteracy, and lack of any prior criminal history, the Supreme Court’s terse plea colloquy was not sufficient to demonstrate that the defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was voluntary, knowing, and intelligent (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337 [2015]). Moreover, the plea colloquy failed to address whether the defendant waived the right to appeal the harshness of his sentence (see People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 927-928 [2012]). Therefore, the defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid and does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Leventhal, Austin, Duffy and Barros, JJ., concur.