Case ID: md_391/html/0461-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

893 A.2d 1119
    ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. Michael Craig WORSHAM, Respondent.
    Misc. Docket AG No. 2,
    Sept. Term, 2005.
    Court of Appeals of Maryland.
    March 8, 2006.
    John C. Borderick, Asst. Bar Counsel (Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel, Atty. Grievance Com’n), for petitioner.
    Charles E. Iliff, Jr., Pasadena, for respondent.
   ORDER

The Court having considered the Petition for Disciplinary Action, the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law submitted by the hearing judge, the exceptions and recommendations of the parties filed hereto and the oral argument of counsel in the above-captioned case, it is this 8th day of March, 2006.

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the exceptions and recommendation of Bar Counsel be, and they are hereby, overruled, and the petition for disciplinary action is dismissed. Costs to be paid by the Attorney Grievance Commission.