Case ID: f_273/html/0523-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ALLEMANNI et al. v. UNITED STATES.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    April 13, 1921.)
    No. 172.
    Criminal law <©=1009(19) — Stipulation that transcript of record is true docs not bring up exceptions.
    A stipulation by counsel that tbe transcript of record bad been agreed on as true does not bring before tbe appellate court any exception taken at tbe trial, where no bill of exceptions was ever signed by tbe judge.
    In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
    Cesare Allemanni and another were convicted of crime, and they bring error.
    Affirmed.
    Austin & Abruzzo, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for plaintiff in error Eantini. (besar B. F. Barra, of New York City, for plaintiff in error Allemanni.
    Francis G. Caffey, U. „S. Atty., of New York City (G. W. Taylor, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for the United States. Before WARD, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.
    <=For other oases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes
   PER CURIAM.

May 18, 1920, these defendants were found guilty by the jury and no bill of exceptions was ever signed by the judge. December 3, 1920, counsel for the parties stipulated that the transcript of record had been agreed upon as true. This brought before us no exception taken at the trial as to which error was assigned. Still we have examined the assignments and think none involves reversible error.

The judgment is affirmed.