Case ID: so2d_802/html/0516-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael Andre WHITE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D01-1435.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 26, 2001.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Valerie Jonas and Carlos Gonzalez, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Steven R. Berger, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and SHEVIN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968) (holding that to effect an investigatory stop, a police officer need only have a founded suspicion that a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime); Saturnino-Boudet v. State, 682 So.2d 188, 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (holding that founded suspicion needed to justify investigatory stop is fact specific to each case and based on totality of circumstances as viewed by an experienced police officer); Jones v. State, 758 So.2d 722, 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (holding that “under ‘inevitable discovery’ doctrine, evidence obtained ■ as the result of an unlawful search is admissible if the evidence would ultimately have been discovered by legal means.”).