Case ID: f-appx_467/html/0832-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Johnny Ward PUTNAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BAYER A.G., et al., Defendants, Bayer Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 11-12999.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    April 24, 2012.
    John T. Givens, Patrick Cash Malouf, Timothy W. Porter, Porter & Malouf, Jackson, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    
      Patricia E. Lowry, Amy Bloom, Barbara Bolton Litton, Squire Sanders & Dempsey (US), LLP, West Palm Bch, FL, Steven E. Derringer, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott, LLP, Eugene Schoon, Sidley Austin, LLP, Chicago, IL, William F. Goodman, C. Alleen Mclain, Watkins & Eager, Jackson, MS, Rebecca K. Wood, Sidley Austin, LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendants.
    Before HULL and COX, Circuit Judges, and BOWEN, District Judge.
    
      
       The Honorable Dudley H. Bowen, Jr., United States District Judge for the Southern District of Georgia, sitting by designation.
    
   PER CURIAM:

After review and oral argument before this Court, we conclude that Plaintiff-Appellant Johnny Ward Putnam has shown no reversible error in the district court’s order, dated 27 May 2011, granting summary judgment in favor of DefendantAppellee Bayer Corporation on all of Putnam’s claims, based on Mississippi’s statutes of limitation.

The district court did not err in finding that, as a matter of law, Putnam failed to show that the relevant Mississippi limitation periods were tolled based on theories of fraudulent concealment and/or discovery of latent injury.

AFFIRMED.