Case ID: sw3d_398/html/0055-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Peggy FRANTZ, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent.
    No. WD 75195.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    April 2, 2013.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 30, 2013.
    
      Craig D. Hines, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
    Larry R. Ruhmann, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before Division Three: CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and GARY D. WITT, Judge.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Peggy Frantz appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying unemployment benefits • on the basis that her termination was due to misconduct connected with work. Frantz claims the decision should be reversed because: (1) employer did not meet its burden of proof and the record does not establish by a preponderance of the evidence that Frantz’s actions constituted misconduct; (2) the Commission’s findings of fact and witness credibility determinations were procured through fraud by Employer’s witness; (3) the hearing and the resultant denial of benefits violated Frantz’s rights to procedural and substantive due process, and to the equal protection of the law; and (4) the Commission erred in its legal conclusion that Frantz’s actions constituted misconduct in that the record does not establish culpable misconduct. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).