Case ID: so2d_490/html/0085-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Larry KING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. BI-54.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Jan. 15, 1986.
    Larry King, pro se.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion for correction of sentence based upon his assertion that the sentence violated the plea agreement is AFFIRMED. The trial court has attached to its order the transcripts of the plea and sentencing hearings, which conclusively show that appellant is entitled to no relief. Appellant may not in the future assert this ground in a motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

THOMPSON, ZEHMER and BAR-FIELD, JJ., concur.