Case ID: njl_99/html/0515-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MORRIS MARGOLIS AND HYMAN M. MARGOLIS, RESPONDENTS, v. MAN PINNAS AND SAM PINNAS, PARTNERS, TRADING AS PINNAS & PINNAS, APPELLANTS.
    Submitted December 10, 1923
    Decided April 11, 1924.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 1 N. J. Mis. B. 117.
    For the respondents, Benjamin M. Weinberg.
    
    For the appellants, Harry Levin and Milton M. Unger.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Minturn. Kalisoh, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.