Case ID: so2d_595/html/1118-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SHIVERS, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Daniel P. BROWN, Appellant, v. DEALERS INSURANCE COMPANY and Florida Managing General Agency, Inc., #555, Appellees. DEALERS INSURANCE COMPANY and Florida Managing General Agency, Inc., # 555, Cross-Appellants, v. Betty C. KIRKPATRICK d/b/a Kirkpatrick Insurance Agency, Cross-Appellee.
    No. 91-1618.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    April 8, 1992.
    Antony E. Fiorentino, Pensacola, for appellant Daniel P. Brown.
    Gordon D. Cherr, of McConnaughhay, Roland, Maida, Cherr, and McCranie, P.A., for appellees/cross-appellants Dealers Ins. Co. and Florida Managing General Agency, Inc., No. 555.
    Gayle H. Cramer and Dennis K. Larry, of Clark, Partington, Hart, Larry, Bond, Stackhouse & Stone, Pensacola, for cross-appellee Betty C. Kirkpatrick d/b/a Kirkpatrick Ins. Agency.
   SHIVERS, Judge.

We affirm that portion of the trial court’s Final Judgment in favor of Dealers Insurance Company (Dealers) and Florida Managing General Agency, Inc., # 555, entered on the verdict of the jury on the claim of Daniel P. Brown. As to Brown’s claim against Betty C. Kirkpatrick, d/b/a Kirkpatrick Insurance Agency, we find that the questions were properly submitted to the jury, and we reverse the judgment non obstante veredicto and direct that the jury verdict in favor of Brown and against Kirkpatrick be reinstated and judgment in favor of Brown and against Betty C. Kirkpatrick d/b/a Kirkpatrick Insurance Agency be entered thereon. In view of our disposition, it is unnecessary to reach the issues raised by Dealers on cross-appeal.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with directions.

MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.