Case ID: so2d_589/html/1036-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Allen WILSON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 91-00313.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Dec. 6, 1991.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Brad Permar, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dell H. Edwards, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s convictions for possession and sale of cocaine. Contrary to defendant’s contention on appeal, it appears clear that there had been no entrapment under the objective test of Cruz v. State, 465 So.2d 516 (Fla.1985).

We reiterate that in this court’s view that objective test was not abolished by section 777.201, Florida Statutes (1987). See Bowser v. State, 555 So.2d 879 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). Contra Krajewski v. State, 587 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Gonzalez v. State, 571 So.2d 1346 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and LEHAN, JJ., concur.