Case ID: so2d_677/html/0997-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FLORIDA MINING & MATERIALS, Appellant, v. Thomas Ray HOLLEY, Appellee.
    No. 95-4026.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Aug. 14, 1996.
    Debra M. Metzler and Mary Ann Stiles of Stiles, Taylor & Metzler, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.
    Rosemary B. Eure of Lancaster & Eure, P.A., Sarasota, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

REVERSED AND REMANDED. The order setting the amount of the attorney’s fee is facially insufficient. See Metric Constructors, Inc. v. Boyles, 633 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We remand for additional findings as required by section 440.34, Florida Statutes. See Barco Vending Co. v. Villalonga, 608 So.2d 128 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Dobbs v. Suncoast Acoustics, 590 So.2d 7 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

KAHN, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., concur.