Case ID: ad_281/html/0952-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Roy F. Tetor, Respondent, v. Dorothy E. Stansbury, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Reinzi T. Stansbury, Deceased, et al., Appellants.
   Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: The proposed amendment setting up section 36 of the Civil Practice Act has no applicability to an action of this character. All concur. (Appeal from an order denying defendants’ motion for leave to serve an amended answer.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.