Case ID: miss_253/html/0587-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Brady, Tom P., J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Orgill Brothers & Company, Inc. v. Saucier
    No. 43582
    June 14, 1965
    176 So. 2d 480
    
      Ebb J. Ford, Jr., Gulfport, for appellant.
    
      
      J ack Parsons, Wiggins, for appellees.
   Brady, Tom P., J.

We have carefully studied the charadic evidence of this record. Like an iceberg which reveals only one-tenth of itself, the proof here is inadequate. We have come to the same conclusion which the learned circuit judge reached, namely, it is regrettable that the essential evidence, if it be true, has not been proven. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Ethridge, P. J., and Gillespie, Patterson and Inzer, JJ., concur.