Case ID: so2d_627/html/0129-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Earnestine WILKES, Appellant, v. Joseph C. WILKES, Appellee.
    No. 93-403.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 7, 1993.
    Arnold Hecker, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
    Harvey D. Rogers, Miami, for appellee.
    Before NESBITT, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

As the point is not preserved for appellate review, the judgment is affirmed on authority of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a). In addition, the theory of appellant’s appeal does not survive the decision in Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Privette, 617 So.2d 305 (Fla.1993).

Affirmed.