Case ID: f-appx_384/html/0608-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David WEBB, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Joanne Sumie ONIZUKA; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 09-16391.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted May 25, 2010.
    
    Filed June 17, 2010.
    David Webb, Clearfield, UT, pro se.
    Emmanuel G. Guerrero, Esquire, John Ryan Dwyer, Jr., Esquire, Principal Litigation Counsel, Dwyer Schraff Meyer Grant & Green, Pamela W. Bunn, Jason C. Zhao, Paul, Johnson, Park & Niles, Yuriko Jane Sugimura, Esquire, Bendet Fidell Sakai & Lee, Sarah S.P. Wong, Kobayashi, Sugita & Goda, Honolulu, HI, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

David Webb appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action arising from his purchase of a used vehicle. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Peralta v. Hispanic Bus., Inc., 419 F.3d 1064, 1068 (9th Cir.2005). We affirm the dismissal of each defendant because the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.