Case ID: ohio-st-3d_64/html/0457-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dayton Bar Association v. Hanaghan.
    [Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Hanaghan (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 457.]
    (No. 92-834
    Submitted June 2, 1992
    Decided September 2, 1992.)
    
      
      Bieser, Greer & Landis and Howard P. Krisher, for relator.
    
      
      Charles W. Kettlewell, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.