Case ID: f-appx_473/html/0203-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Samuel I. OLEKANMA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASHINGTON ADVENTIST UNIVERSITY; Laena Choudhary, and/or her successor, individually, and in her official capacity as Professor of Nursing 332 Pharmacology, Washington Adventist University an ens legis being used to conceal fraud; Valerie J. Swan, and/or her successor, individually, and in her official capacity as Professor of Nursing 350 Concepts of Maximum Health, Washington Adventist University an ens legis being used to conceal fraud, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 12-1178.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 31, 2012.
    Decided: June 5, 2012.
    Samuel I. Olekanma, Appellant Pro Se. H. Dean Bouland, Jr., Carrie McMahon Freeman, Bouland & Brush, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Samuel I. Olekanma appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed under various civil and criminal federal statutes. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Olekanma v. Washington Adventist Univ., No. 8:11-cv-01713-RWT (D.Md. Feb. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.