Case ID: f2d_283/html/0865-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William E. HEUER, Jr. and Lucille M. Heuer, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
    No. 18233.
    United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
    Dec. 6, 1960.
    Louis Dutrey, Elwood H. Clay, New Orleans, La., Clay, Coleman, Dutrey & Thomson, New Orleans, La., for petitioners.
    C. Guy Tadlock, Robert N. Anderson, Lee A. Jackson, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Charles P. Dugan, Sp. Atty., I.R.S., Hart H. Spiegel, Chief Counsel, I.R.S., Washington, D. C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
    Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and CAMERON and JONES, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

The facts from which this controversy arose and the reasons given by the Tax Court for its decisions sustaining the position of the Commissioner are set forth in the opinion of the Tax Court. Heuer v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 32 T.C. 947. We are in agreement with the conclusions reached by the Tax Court and its decision is

Affirmed.