Case ID: so2d_850/html/0321-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "LYONS, Justice. \n      JOHNSTONE, Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ex parte Jeffery HORNE. (In re Jeffrey Horne v. State of Alabama).
    1010796.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Nov. 1, 2002.
    Jeffery Horne, pro se.
    William H. Pryor, Jr., atty. gen., and G. Ward Beeson III, asst. atty. gen., for respondent.
    
      
       The defendant filed his petition under the name "Jeffery Horne." The Court of Criminal Appeals spelled the defendant's name “Jeffrey Horne.”
    
   LYONS, Justice.

The writ of certiorari is quashed. See Hale v. State, 848 So.2d 224, 233 (Ala.2002) (holding that “the absence of sentence enhancement allegations from the indictment does not deprive the trial court of jurisdiction to impose the enhancements” and that because the defendant “did not argue before the trial court at any time that the application of the sentence enhancements violated his rights to due process and to a trial by jury, he ... waived appellate review of [those] arguments”).

WRIT QUASHED.

MOORE, C.J., and HOUSTON, SEE, BROWN, HARWOOD, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur.

JOHNSTONE, J., dissents.

JOHNSTONE, Justice

(dissenting).

I respectfully dissent. See the dissenting part of my special writing in Hale v. State, 848 So.2d 224 (Ala.2002).