Case ID: ga_78/html/0353-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Blandford, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Boggess vs. Lowrey.
    The only ground of complaint is, that the court erred in not continuing the case upon application of plaintiff in error. The showing for continuance was complete, except that it failed to show that the same was not made for delay, but to procure the attendance of the witness at the next term. This was material, and the court could well refuse the continuance for this reason.
    (Head-note by the court.)
    Judgment affirmed.
    December 21, 1886.
   Blandford, Justice.