Case ID: njl_52/html/0559-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

LYDIA VAN SICKELL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. PETER J. STAATS ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
    On error to the Supreme Court.
    Eor the plaintiff in error, Theodore B. Booraem.
    
    .Eor the defendants in error, Alan H. Strong.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the-reasons duly given by that court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Dixon, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Van Syokel, Brown, Clement, Cole,. Smith, Whitaker. 11.

For reversal—None.