Case ID: ohio-st-3d_66/html/0163-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      \n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Paxton.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Paxton (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 163.]
    (No. 92-2527
    Submitted February 2, 1993
    Decided April 28, 1993.)
    
      J. Warren Bettis, Disciplinary Counsel, and Dianna L. Chesley, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
    
      Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, David J. Young and John R. Gall; and Mark H. Aultman, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

After reading the testimonial letters submitted by respondent, we agree with the findings and recommendation of the board. We hereby publicly reprimand respondent and tax costs to him.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.