Case ID: sw3d_244/html/0197-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Larry D. ELLIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 89563.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Jan. 15, 2008.
    S. Kristina Starke, Saint Louis, MO, for movant/appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent/respondent.
    Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry D. Ellis appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 29.15 postcon-viction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. White v. State, 57 S.W.3d 341, 343 (Mo.App. E.D.2001). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).