Case ID: f_32/html/0229-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Nelson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Torrent v. Duluth Lumber Co.
    
      (Circuit Court, D. Minnesota.
    
    October 15, 1887.)
    Appeal — Rehearing—Misquotation oe Testimony.
    A rehearing will not be granted because the court in its opinion misquoted the testimonj', where such misquotation does not change the opinion.
    
      Parker & Burton and P. IT. Gunckel, for complainant.
    
      West & Bond, for defendant.
   Nelson, J.

This is a petition for a rehearing and reargument of the case. In the opinion of the court heretofore delivered in this case (30 Fed. Rep. 830) the court (page 835) misquotes the testimony, viz.: “It has to have it on,” quoted from Robert Orm’s testimony, should read: “They all have to have something to hold the tooth-bar up to the log;” hut such misquotation does not change the opinion of the court.

The petition for rehearing and reargument is denied; final decree ordered; accounting waived; appeal taken and allowed; bond on appeal fixed at $500.