Case ID: nj_14/html/0172-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

E. DONALD HARRISON, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. EDWARD H. STANTON, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
    Argued December 21, 1953
    Decided January 4, 1954.
    
      Mr. Arthur F. Mead argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Cox & Wdiburg, attorneys).
    
      Mr. John H. Yauch, Jr., argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Gilhooly, Yauch and Fagan, attorneys).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, 26 N. J. Super. 194.

For affirmance- — Justices Heher, Wachenfeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan — 5.

For reversal — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justice Oliphant — 2.