Case ID: f-appx_15/html/0125-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo Antonio De LOS SANTOS-MORA, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 01-6470.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted July 26, 2001.
    Decided Aug. 2, 2001.
    Ricardo Antonio De Los Santos-Mora, pro se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for appellee.
    Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Ricardo Antonio De Los Santos-Mora seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny De Los Santos-Mora’s motions for a certificate of appealability and to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. De Los Santos-Mora, No. CR-96-49 (E.D.Va. Feb. 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.