Case ID: so2d_692/html/0939-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David MAYOLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 97-0253.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    April 9, 1997.
    Rehearing and Clarification Denied May 16, 1997.
    David Mayolo, Immokalee, pro se.
    Robert A Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sarah B. Mayer, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for ap-pellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The record excerpts attached to the order summarily denying David Mayolo’s rule 3.850 motion do not conclusively refute his allegations that the public defender’s office had a conflict due to its prior representation of a state witness and that he was not given prior notice that a fee for the public defender’s services would be assessed. The order denying the motion is reversed and the case is remanded for evidentiary hearing or attachment of additional record excerpts that show that Mayolo is not entitled to any relief on those two issues. We agree with the trial court’s denial of the remainder of his claims.

GLICKSTEIN, STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.