Case ID: sw3d_541/html/0052-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bruce T. SHOCKLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    WD 80334
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    Order filed: March 6, 2018
    Natalie H. Hoge, for Appellant.
    Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, for Respondent.
    Before Division One: Thomas H. Newton, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Karen King Mitchell, Judge
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM:

Bruce Shockley appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. In his sole point on appeal, he claims the evidence showed that if his counsel had investigated and presented relevant evidence that there is a reasonable probability the outcome of his case would have been different. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).