Case ID: so2d_623/html/0606-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Terrance S. HAMPTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 93-260.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Aug. 31, 1993.
    Rehearing Denied Sept. 28, 1993.
    H.T. Smith and Charlene Honig, Miami, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Fleur J. Lobree, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in either of the arguments presented for reversal of the conviction which is therefore affirmed. However, in view of the admitted uncertainty concerning the proper computation of guidelines points, the sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing.