Case ID: sw3d_471/html/0374-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CÚRIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Nicholas NETTLES, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 101095
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    
    Filed: August 11, 2015
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied September 10, 2015
    Application for Transfer Denied October 27, 2015
    William J. Swift, Public Defenders Office, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Adam S. Rowley, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65109, for Respondent;
    Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.
   ORDER

PER CÚRIAM

Nicholas Nettles (Defendant) appeals the trial court’s judgment, entered after a jury trial, finding him guilty of two counts of kidnapping, two counts of felonious restraint, two counts of sexual exploitation of a minor, and two counts of third-degree assault. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on charges for sexual exploitation of a minor and kidnapping because the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. Defendant also contends that the felonious restraint and kidnapping charges resulted in a violation of his right to be free from double jeopardy. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).