Case ID: f-appx_706/html/0116-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bradley WILLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 17-1438
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: November 28, 2017
    Decided: December 13, 2017
    Joyce E. Smithey, Reuben W. Wolfson, RIFKIN WEINER LIVINGSTON LLC, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellant. Nancy McCutchan Duden, County Attorney, Kelly C. Lovett, Senior Assistant County Attorney, ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before KEENAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bradley Willis appeals the district court’s order granting Anne Arundel County, Maryland, summary judgment on his discriminatory discipline claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2017); Md. Code Ann., State Gov’t Title 20 (West 2017); Md. Const. Deck of Rights, art. 24; and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Willis v. Anne Arundel Cty., Md., No. 1:16-cv-01388-JKB, 2017 WL 952686 (D. Md. March 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED