Case ID: kan_23/html/0216-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sanford Day, et al., v. C. C. Harris.
    Action brought by Harris against Day and another, upon-a promissory note. Trial at the December Term, 1878, of the district court of Cowley county, and verdict and judgment for the defendants. The court sustained plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, to which order defendants excepted, and have brought the case here.
    
      James McDermott, and Johnson & Davis, for plaintiffs in error.
    
      Hackney & McDonald, for defendant in error.
   Per Curiam:

The judgment of the court below will be-affirmed, upon the authority of the following cases, to wit: Anthony v. Eddy, 5 Kas. 127, 133, 134, and cases there cited; Field v. Kinnear, 5 Kas. 233, 238, and cases there cited; Owen v. Owen, 9 Kas. 91; Atyeo v. Kelsey, 13 Kas. 212, 216; McCrum v. Corby, 15 Kas. 112; Bedell v. National Bank, 16 Kas. 130; Barrett v. Barnes, 17 Kas. 266. All these cases require that the judgment of the court below be affirmed; and it is affirmed.