Case ID: so2d_932/html/0465-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jeromy BAUTZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D06-1790.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 31, 2006.
    Jeromy Bautz, Arcadia, pro se.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The denial of Bautz’s rule 3.800 motion to correct sentence is affirmed without prejudice. Bautz may raise the claim of a violation of the plea agreement in a timely and legally sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Catlin v. State, 929 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Lee v. State, 637 So.2d 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.