Case ID: nj-misc_2/html/0577-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JAY RUSSELL. PLAINTIFF, v. EVA M. SMITH ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
    Decided June 19, 1924.
    Service of Summons. — Defendant’s Usual Abode" is With Parents.
    On rule to show cause why service of summons should not he vacated.
    Before Justice Mintukn.
    Eor the rule, Collins é Corbin.
    
    
      Contra, Alexander Simpson.
    
   The residence of the defendant, or his usual place of abode in this state, is the home of his parents. The testimony makes that fact reasonably clear; and henee, I conclude that their residence was his usual place of abode in this state within the meaning of the statute.

‘ The rule upon the subject, as declared by this court, is amply stated in accordance with that conclusion in Missell v. Hayes, 84 N. J. L. 196, and 85 Atl. Rep. 818.

The rule to show cause will therefore he discharged.