Case ID: sw3d_375/html/0262-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Terrish LANDRUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 97725.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Aug. 28, 2012.
    Timothy J. Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terrish Landrum appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).