Case ID: f-appx_139/html/0697-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "COLE, Circuit Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PARKWOOD PLACE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF BRECKSVILLE, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 04-3739.
    United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
    July 28, 2005.
    Patrick M. Flanagan, Rocky River, OH, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    John T. McLandrich, Frank H. Scialdone, Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder, Cleveland, OH, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Before BATCHELDER and COLE, Circuit Judges; REEVES, District Judge.
    
    
      
       The Honorable Danny C. Reeves, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.
    
   OPINION

COLE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Parkwood Place, et. al., appeal a district court order granting Defendant-Appellee City of Breeksville’s motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6). The plaintiffs’ complaint alleges that the enactment of two zoning ordinances violates state and federal law because the ordinances infringe upon plaintiffs’ property rights as established in previous litigation regarding the zoning of the same property. On appeal, Parkwood contends that the district court erred in: (1) dismissing the state law claims under the “law-of-the-case” doctrine, (2) dismissing the federal constitutional claims because of collateral estoppel, and (3) dismissing the takings claims because they were not yet ripe for review.

We have reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions. For substantially the same reasons set forth in the district court’s comprehensive opinion, we AFFIRM the district court’s grant of the City of Brecksville’s motion to dismiss.