Case ID: pa_627/html/0252-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

99 A.3d 531
    Frank ZAMPOGNA, Respondent v. LAW ENFORCEMENT HEALTH BENEFITS, INC., Petitioner.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Sept. 9, 2014.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED on the following issues as stated by Petitioner:

a. Whether Courts may disregard the vital function of corporate self-governance by second-guessing the decisions of corporate directors and failing to provide the required deference to their decision simply because the court may not agree with the decision?

b. Whether a court may simply usurp the role of corporate directors by negating the presumption of good-faith to the decisions of directors required by law by simply asserting, without requiring any proof thereof, a conflict of interest by the directors?

c. Whether funds, whose original source was a public entity, retain their public character once the public entity distributes those funds to a private corporation in satisfaction of an obligation, and after the private corporation had retained those funds as corporate assets, and after that corporation utilized the corporate assets for a corporate purpose?