Case ID: so2d_568/html/0452-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 89-1082.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Aug. 1, 1990.
    On Motion for Rehearing Sept. 26, 1990.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Marcy K. Allen, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Michael H. Greenfield and Patricia G. Lampert, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and KAHN, MARTIN D., Associate Judge, concur.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

We deny the motion but acknowledge that we have rejected appellant’s claim that the habitual offender statute is facially unconstitutional. Johnson v. State, 564 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Broderick v. State, 564 So.2d 622 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).