Case ID: sw2d_644/html/0479-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Albert Roman CASTRO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
    No. 638-82.
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.
    Jan. 26, 1983.
    John R. Froeschner, Texas City, for appellant.
    James F. Hury, Jr., Dist. Atty. and Michael J. Guarino and David T. Marks, Asst. Dist. Attys., Galveston, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty. and Alfred Walker, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.
   OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of murder and punishment was assessed at imprisonment in the Texas Department of Corrections for 15 years. Appellant’s conviction was reversed and remanded in a published opinion delivered by the Court of Appeals. Castro v. State, No. C-14-81-821-CR, (delivered 06/10/82) (Tex.App.—Houston [14th] 1982).

It now appears that the decision to grant the state’s petition for discretionary review was improvident. Tex.Cr.App.R. 304(k); Art. 44.45(b)(6) & (7), V.A.C.C.P. See Hanna v. State, 632 S.W.2d 151 (Tex.Cr.App.1982).

The state’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.

TEAGUE, J., not participating.