Case ID: minn_81/html/0278-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER OURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

W. E. INGALLS v. NELS HOLMGREN.
    
    October 25, 1900.
    Nos. 12,275—(177).
    Assignment of Error.
    Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Otter Tail county, Searle, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
    Affirmed.
    
      James T. McCulloch, for appellant.
    
      Chas. C. Houpt, for respondent.
    
      
       Reported in 83 N. W. 980.
    
   PER OURIAM.

A verdict having been returned for defendant in the court below, plaintiff moved for a new trial on two grounds: First, that the verdict of the jury was not justified by the evidence and is contrary to law; second, for error in law occurring at the trial, and excepted to by the plaintiff. The motion for a new trial was denied, and plaintiff appealed.

The only assignment of error is as follows: “The court erred in refusing plaintiff a new trial.” Under the authority of Stevens v. City of Minneapolis, 42 Minn. 136, 43 N. W. 842, the assignment is wholly insufficient.

Order affirmed.