Case ID: sw3d_544/html/0700-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Scott SOLOVIC, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 105480
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
    Filed: April 17, 2018
    Kevin B. Gau, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, Saint Louis, MO. 63101, for appellant.
    Mary H. Moore, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.
    Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Scott Solovic appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Motion requesting post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2017). 
      
      All references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2016, unless otherwise indicated.