Case ID: nj-eq_88/html/0594-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marie A. Eugster, petitioner-respondent, v. Benedict Eugster, defendant-appellant.
    [Decided January 31st, 1918.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson, whose opinion is reported ante p. 73.
    
    
      Mr. Isidor H. Brand, for the respondent.
    
      Messrs. Queen & Stout, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in tbe opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson.

For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 13.

For reversal — None.