Case ID: so2d_198/html/0835-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Curtiss L. RAINES, Marvin Francois, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    Nos. 66-714, 66-720.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    May 16, 1967.
    Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and' Phillip A. Hubbart, Asst. Public Defender,, for appellants.
    Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf and Jesse McCrary, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.
    
      Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and SWANN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The appellants were convicted of robbery after a joint trial before the court without jury. Their appeals raise a single point which is that the proof was insufficient to support the judgment. We hold the proof sufficient under the rule stated in Stephens v. State, 92 Fla. 43, 109 So. 303 (1926); Wood v. State, 98 Fla. 703, 124 So. 44 (1929) and the rule stated in State v. Sebastian, Fla.1965, 171 So.2d 893.

Affirmed.