Case ID: pa-super_202/html/0172-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Ervin, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hainzer Unemployment Compensation Case.
    Argued November 12, 1963.
    Before Rhodes, P. J., Ervin, Wright, Woodside, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ.
    Appeal, No. 272,
    
      Anna A. Hainzer, appellant, in propria persona, submitted a brief.
    
      Sydney Reuben, Assistant Attorney General, with him Walter E. Alessandroni, Attorney General, for Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, appellee.
    December 12, 1963:
   Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

In this unemployment compensation case the bureau, referee and the board all concluded that thé appellant voluntarily terminated her employment because of domestic reasons and that she was disqualified from receiving benefits under the provisions of §402(b) (2) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802(b) (2).

Claimant quit her full-time employment because her baby sitter left and she had no one to care for her five-year old child. This case is ruled by Dawkins Unemployment Compensation Case, 197 Pa. Superior Ct. 427, 178 A. 2d 775; and Domico Unemployment Compensation Case, 198 Pa. Superior Ct. 327, 181 A. 2d 731.

Decision affirmed.