Case ID: la-ann_45/html/0484-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Watkins, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 11,214.
    Caroline Prudhomme vs. R. B. Williams. Isaac McMills, Warrantor.
    Same as in Russ & Hollingsworth vs. Their Creditors, this day decided.
    APPEAL from the Eleventh District Court, Parish of Natchitoches. Pierson, J.
    
    
      Cunningham & Tucker and Omer Villeré for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    
      Scarborough & Carver for Defendant and Appellee.
    
      C. F. Dranquet for Warrantor and Appellee.
   The opinion of the court was delivered by

Watkins, J.

The defendant and appellee moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appeal bond is wanting in two essential requisites, to-wit: First, in not containing the stipulation of the Code of Practice that appellant shall prosecute her appeal; and, second, in not specifying the amount for which the sureties are bound.

The first of the two foregoing objections was made and sustained in Russ & Hollingsworth vs. Their Creditors, No. 11,189 of the docket of this court, decided this day, and on that ground the appeal was dismissed.

Without expressing any opinion upon the second objection, it is sufficient to say that for the reasons therein assigned the motion of the defendant and appellee in this case must be likewise sustained, and the appeal dismissed; and it is so ordered.

Rehearing refused.