Case ID: f-appx_45/html/0317-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bernard SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Parris N. GLENDENING, State of Maryland, Governor; Anthony Williams, Mayor, Washington D.C.; David Garraghty, Warden, Greensville Correctional Center, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 02-6995.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 9, 2002.
    Decided Sept. 18, 2002.
    Bernard Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Bernard Smith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Smith v. Glendening, No. CA-02-10 (E.D.Va. June 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.