Case ID: f-appx_66/html/0512-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ELKAY MINING COMPANY, a West Virginia Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ATEL FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a foreign corporation; Atel Cash Distribution Fund V, L.P., a limited partnership, Defendants-Appellants.
    No. 02-1747.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted June 3, 2003.
    Decided June 18, 2003.
    David Marvin Wiseblood, Berg & Parker L.L.P., San Francisco, California, for Appellants. Richard J. Bolen, Huddleston, Bolen, Beatty, Porter & Copen, L.L.P., Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, and LUTTIG and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant ATEL Financial Corporation (“ATEL”) appeals the district court’s resolution of cross-motions for summary judgment in favor of Appellee Elkay Mining Company (“Elkay”) on Elkay’s declaratory judgment claim that it did not owe any “termination value” to ATEL on an expired lease for mining equipment. We have reviewed the record below, the opinion of the district court, and the briefs of the parties. Because we conclude that the district court properly resolved the legal questions presented on summary judgment, we affirm the judgment of that court on the reasoning of its well-written opinion.

AFFIRMED.