Case ID: sw2d_945/html/0588-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Claude TURNER, Defendant/Appellant. Claude TURNER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    Nos. 67035, 71010.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    May 13, 1997.
    Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Kurt U. Schaefer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of one count of sale of a controlled substance, § 195.211, RSMo Supp.1993, and one count of unlawful use of a weapon, § 571.030, RSMo Supp.1993. The court found defendant to be a prior, persistent, and Class X offender and sentenced him to two concurrent prison terms of ten years. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).