Case ID: so2d_369/html/0948-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James W. INGRAM, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 53929.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    April 5, 1979.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, Miami, for petitioner.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and James H. Greason, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ. Upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by article V, section (3)(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.