Case ID: ala-app_22/html/0682-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM-.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(112 So. 923)
    Zone MARSHALL v. STATE.
    (7 Div. 299.)
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    April 12, 1927.
    W. W. Haralson, Judge.
    See, also, 109 So. 558.
    John B. Isbell, of Ft.' Payne, for appellant.
    Charlie C., McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.
   PER CURIAM-.

The court has considered this case en banc, and after reading the entire record it is the opinion of the court that the trial court admitted error in refusing to grant tp tlie .defendant a new trial upon his motion. - The -judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded. Reversed and remanded.