Case ID: ny_186/html/0579-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Arthur F. Simonson, Respondent, v. Louis P. Mendham et al., Appellants.
    Reported below, 115 App. Div. 882.
    (Submitted November 12, 1906;
    decided November 20, 1906.)
    Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 3, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
    The .motion was made upon the ground that the appeal was irregular and unauthorized.
    
      Albert A. Wray and Stephen Callaghan for motion.
    
      Frank A. Acer opposed.
   Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.