Case ID: misc_8/html/0693-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "McCarthy, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles H. Mead et al., Respondents, v. H. Edgar Hartwell et al., Appellants.
    
      Dill <& Chandler, for respondents.
    
      J. C. dk H. C. /Smith & Koejpke, for appellants.
   McCarthy, J.

There is nothing in the objections of the appellants.

It is too finely drawn. The summons complies with the order and its intent.

The order is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

Ehrlich, Ch. J., and Vah Wyck, J., concur.

Order affirmed, with costs.