Case ID: sw2d_865/html/0681-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Anthony JACKSON, Appellant. Anthony JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    Nos. 59669, 61883.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Dec. 7, 1993.
    S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay), Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Batson challenge to the State’s peremptory strikes of four venirepersons after this court remanded to the trial court to determine whether said strikes were racially motivated, 865 S.W.2d 678. We find no clear error in such denial. State v. Pullen, 843 S.W.2d 360, 362—63[3] (Mo. banc 1992).

We further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.