Case ID: so2d_652/html/0935-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bryant VALDEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 93-04309.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    March 31, 1995.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ron Napolitano, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm the imposition of restitution, but remand for a hearing to determine the amount. See State v. Sanderson, 625 So.2d 471 (Fla.1993); Crosby v. State, 637 So.2d 341 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). On remand, the trial court is also directed to reconsider its cost order to conform with this court’s recent decision in Reyes v. State, 20 Fla.L.Weekly D467,-So.2d-[1995 WL 65502] (Fla. 2d DCA Feb. 15, 1995).

FRANK, C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.