Case ID: sw3d_452/html/0740-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joshua L. SCRUGGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 101221
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
    
    Filed: January 13, 2015
    Andrew E. Zleit, Assistant Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Andrew C. Hooper, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before Patricia L. Cohen, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joshua L. Scruggs appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).