Case ID: f-appx_285/html/0073-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MOOG, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stepan V. LUNIN, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-2091.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 25, 2008.
    Decided: July 25, 2008.
    Stepan V. Lunin, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin M. Kearney, Hodgson, Russ, Andrews, Woods & Goodyear, Buffalo, New York; Robert W. McFarland, McGuire-woods, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Stepan V. Lunin appeals the district court’s order granting Moog, Inc.’s (“Moog”) motion for summary judgment and converting the preliminary injunction previously entered against Lunin into a permanent injunction. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and find the district court did not err in granting Moog summary judgment, or abuse its discretion in ordering the permanent injunction. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Moog, Inc. v. Lunin, No. 2:06-cv-00238-RBS (E.D.Va. Oct. 2, 2007).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.