Case ID: f-appx_486/html/0370-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William Bill CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. CHEESEBORO, Sargeant/H.R.R.J.; c/o Simmons, Corr. Officer at H.R.R.J.; SGT. Ward, Sargeant at H.R.R.J.; MJO Littlejohn, Master Jail Officer/H.R.R.J.; C/O C. Rogers, Corr. Officer/Hearings; M.J.O. Hansley, Master Jail Officer/H.R.R.J., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 12-6670.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Sept. 21, 2012.
    Decided: Nov. 1, 2012.
    William Bill Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville, Norris & St. Clair P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Bill Clark appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clark v. Cheeseboro, No. 2:11-cv-00097-RAJ-TEM (E.D.Va. Mar. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.