Case ID: sw3d_62/html/0494-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Arlene FLACH, Defendant/Appellant, and Laura J. Burge, Richard L. Flach, Jr., Cindy F. Miller, Kenneth E. Flach and Douglas I. Flach, Defendants/Respondents.
    No. ED 79404.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Oct. 16, 2001.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 28, 2001.
    Application for Transfer Denied Jan. 22, 2002.
    Robert J. Selsor, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Robert O. Appleton, Jr., David M. Stol-ze, Clayton, Carl C. Pohle, Clayton, MO, Jeana D. McFerron, David W. Gearhart, St. Louis, MO, for respondents.
    Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J., MARY R. RUSSELL, and MARY K. HOFF, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Arlene Flach appeals from the grant of summary judgment in a suit to interpret provisions of a will that created a trust under which her husband was a beneficiary. She alleges that the trial court erred in finding that her stepchildren were each entitled to an undivided one-fifth interest in the trust estate in that a later provision of the will required the trustee to provide for her support. We find no error and affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. We have, however, furnished the parties with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).