Case ID: ohio-st-2d_46/html/0271-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State, ex rel. General Motors Corp., Chevrolet Motor Div., Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as State, ex rel. General Motors Corp., v. Indus. Comm. (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 271.]
    (No. 76-45
    —Decided May 26,1976.)
    
      
      Messrs. Baughman Hayes and Mr. Kenneth F. Seminatore, for appellant.
    
      Mr. William J. Brown, attorney general, and Mr. John F. Livorno, for appellee Industrial Commission.
    
      Stanley Yulish Co., L. P. A., and Mr. Stanley Yulish, for appellee Lloyd L. Moore.
   Per Curiam.

Appellant contends that “respondent grossly abused its discretion by awarding a percentage of disability in reliance upon medical reports of conditions (a) other than those for which the claim was allowed, (b) not supported by objective evidence of (c) new and changed conditions. ’ ’

However, a review of the record discloses that there is evidence which supports the findings of the Industrial Commission, and, accordingly, this court will not disturb that determination. See State, ex rel. General Motors Corp., v. Indus. Comm. (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 278, 282.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals denying the writ is affirmed. .

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neiml, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan,- Stern.,- Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.