Case ID: cust-ct_37/html/0497-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Lawrence, Judge:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

(Reap. Dec. 8637)
    Entry No. 964730, etc.
    Royal Hair Pin Corp. v. United States
    (Decided September 7, 1956)
    
      Sylvan Schwartz for the plaintiff.
    
      George Cochran Doub, Assistant' Attorney General, (Daniel I. Auster, trial attorney), for the defendant.
   Lawrence, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached to and made part of the decision herein, were filed against the decision of the appraiser in appraising the sewing-machine needles covered thereby for dutiable purposes.

When these cases came on for trial, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff, and the court ordered the cases submitted.

In conformity with the requirements of the statute (28 U. S. C. § 2631), I have examined the records in the appeals for a reappraisement before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find, and hold that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.