Case ID: so2d_622/html/0638-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jack R. BRUCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-01360.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Aug. 25, 1993.
    Judith Ellis, St. Petersburg, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Katherine V. Blanco, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant argues that the court erred when it revoked his probation. Although our review leads us to conclude that the record contains sufficient evidence to find that appellant violated his probation, we remand for the trial court to properly specify which conditions were violated in a written order of revocation.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.