Case ID: so2d_507/html/1134-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David SCHWARTZ, Alex Smilow, Sidney Teichman, Jack Fogel, Martin Berkowitz, Jack Bernstein, Barry Hoffman, and Harry Friedman, d/b/a Bayview Associates, a Florida General Partnership, Appellants, v. Daniel RETTER, Appellee.
    No. 86-1573.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 28, 1987.
    Rehearing Denied June 16, 1987.
    Cooper, Wolfe & Bolotin and Sharon Wolfe and Maureen E. Lefebvre, Miami, Robert E. Schack, Coral Gables, Grover, Ciment, Weinstein, Stauber & Friedman, Miami Beach, for appellants.
    Zuckerman & Venditti and Donald S. Zuckerman, Miami, and Debra Cholodof-sky, Miami Beach, for appellee.
    Before HENDRY, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from an adverse final summary judgment entered by the circuit court in a legal malpractice action against defendant/appellee. The trial court found that there was no genuine issue of material fact and that the defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

We have considered the trial court’s ruling in the light of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel and have concluded that the court was correct in entering the summary judgment. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.