Case ID: so2d_776/html/0031-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "HOUSTON, Justice. COOK, Justice", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lisa COAR, as mother and next friend of Deneidra Coar; and Deneidra Coar v. CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL OF ALABAMA et al.
    1980994.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Nov. 24, 1999.
    Rehearing Denied Jan. 28, 2000.
    Jeffrey W. Bennitt of Bennitt & Bufford, L.L.C., Birmingham, for appellant.
    Robert L. Williams of Spain & Gillon, L.L.C., Birmingham, for Dr. Danny Cartwright and Dr. Tom Belhorn.
    Jasper P. Juliano and Dorothy A. Powell of Parsons, Lee & Juliano, P.C., Birmingham, for The Children’s Hosp. of Alabama.
   HOUSTON, Justice.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala.R.App.P.; Ex parte Cranman [Ms. 1971903, November 24, 1999]; Ex parte Rizk [Ms. 1970493, November 24, 1999]; Wimpee v. Stella [Ms. 1971774, November 24, 1999]; and Wells v. Storey, [Ms. 1970450, November 24, 1999], — So.2d - (Ala.1999).

HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, SEE, LYONS, and BROWN, JJ., concur.

COOK and JOHNSTONE, JJ., dissent.

COOK, Justice

(dissenting).

I respectfully dissent, for the same reasons I expressed in Ex parte Cranman [Ms. 1971903, November 24, 1999] (Cook, J., dissenting). 
      
       Note from the reporter of decisions: The Supreme Court, on June 16, 2000, withdrew the Cranman opinion of November 24, 1999, and substituted another opinion. On June 30, 2000, on application for rehearing, the Supreme Court withdrew its November 24, 1999, opinion in Rizk and substituted another, with a different result. On September 1, 2000, the Supreme Court withdrew its November 24, 1999, memorandum affirmance in Wim-pee and substituted an opinion, with a different result. As of the date this memorandum in Coar v. Children's Hospital of Alabama was released for publication in the official reports, the Cranman, Rizk, and Wimpee cases were pending on applications for rehearing and therefore the opinions in those cases had not been released for publication.