Case ID: njl_3/html/0231-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "By the Court.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[*] PIGGIN against BLACKMAN.
    OH CERTIORARI.
    The action before the justice, was brought on the following state of demand:
    Edward Piggin Dr. to John Blackman, to two thirds of one execution we held against Isaac Simpkins, to the amount of $19 32 Two thirds of the balance due me, 12 66
    JOHN BLACKMAN, Jr.
    The lirst objection taken to the proceedings below, was the insufficiency of the state of demand.
   By the Court.

The interest of the plaintiff below in the execution against Simpkins, is not clearly set out; but supposing it was, how was the defendant below liable for it? It is not stated that he had either received the money, or promised to pay it.

Judgment reversed.