Case ID: f3d_743/html/1295-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Barbara BAUMAN; Gregory Grieco; Josefina Nunez; Gabriele Nunez; Miriam Nunez; Silvia Nunez; Emilio Guillermo Pescé; Mirta Haydee Arenas; Graciéla Gigena; Guillermo Alberto Gigena, Nuria Gigena; Amelia Schiaffo; Elba Leichner; Anuncia-ción Spaltro De Belmonte; Hector Ratto; Eduardo Olasiregui; Ricardo Martin Hoffman; Eduardo Estiville; Alfredo Manuel Martin; Juan Jose Martin; Jose Barreiro; Alejandro Daer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION and DaimlerChrysler AG, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 07-15386.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Feb. 28, 2014.
    Terrence Patrick Collingsworth, Esquire, Senior Partner, Natacha H. Thys, Esquire, Senior, Conrad & Scherer, LLP, Washington, DC, Paul Hoffman, Schon-brun Desimone Seplow Harris Hoffman & Harrison, LLP, Venice, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    Peter J. Messrobian, Esquire, Sedgwick LLP, Matthew James Kemner, Esquire, Carroll, Burdick & McDonough, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Thomas Henderson Du-pree, Jr., Daniel W. Nelson, Esquire, Theodore Olson, Amir C. Tayrani, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.
    Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and STEPHEN REINHARDT, Gircuit Judges.
   ORDER

In accordance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of January 14, 2014, as well as the resulting judgment, the district court’s order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss is AFFIRMED.