Case ID: ga_99/html/0249-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Lumpkin, J.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WHEELWRIGHT & COMPANY v. MURRAY.
    July 13, 1896. By two Justices.
    Complaint on account. Before Judge Sweat. Ware superior court. April term, 1895.
    
      Grovatt & Whitfield and W. M. Toomer, for plaintiffs in error. Hitch & Myers, contra.
   Lumpkin, J.

1. The controlling question in this case was this day ■decided in the case of Wheelwright & Co. v. Dyal & Upchurch.

2. The bill of particulars attached to the plaintiff’s declaration, though defective, was cured by amendment, and the amendment set forth no new cause of action.

3. The evidence was conflicting, but warranted the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.