Case ID: so2d_758/html/1199-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jason DENNIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 4D99-4301.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    May 10, 2000.
    Jason Dennis, Chipley, pro se.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Jason Dennis argues that the trial court erred in denying his amended 3.850 motion on the ground that it was untimely and successive. We agree with Dennis as his amended motion was “filed” in accordance with Haag v. State, 591 So.2d 614 (Fla.1992), three days before the trial court denied his initial 3.850 motion.

Nonetheless, we have considered the merits of his claim and conclude that any error was harmless. See, e.g., Wilson v. State, 436 So.2d 908 (Fla.1983).

WARNER, C.J., KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.