Case ID: sw3d_458/html/0481-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Andrew MOORE, Appellant.
    No. ED 101431
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    Filed: March 17, 2015
    Amanda P. Faerber, Public Defenders Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for appellant.
    Todd T. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for respondent.
    Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM

Andrew Moore (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of unlawful possession of a firearm and unlawful use of a firearm. In his sole point on appeal, Defendant claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal in that there was insufficient evidence presented to find him guilty of each offense beyond a reasonable doubt. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).