Case ID: ohio-st_142/html/0548-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "By the Court.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State, ex rel. Fulton, Supt. of Banks, et al., Appellees, v. Halliday et al., Appellants. 
    (No. 29501—
    Decided February 23, 1944.)
    
      
      Mr. Robert W. Halliday and Mr. William T. Arnos, for appellants.
    
      Messrs. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, for appellees.
   By the Court.

The record before this court does not contain proof sufficient to sustain the petition to vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The proceedings of a trial court are deemed correct unless error affirmatively appears on the face of the record. Makranczy v. Gelfand, Admr., 109 Ohio St., 325, 142 N. E., 688.

Assuming the second petition to vacate was filed within limitation, all issues presented thereby had been finally determined in the proceeding under the former petition to vacate.

’ There is nothing in the present record to establish that appellant Robert W. Halliday had not had an adjudication by a Court of Appeals composed of qualified and disinterested judges.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Bell, Williams and Turner, JJ., concur.