Case ID: njl_105/html/0642-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

O’GORMAN & YOUNG, INCORPORATED, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT, v. PHOENIX ASSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED, OF LONDON, A CORPORATION OF GREAT BRITAIN, RESPONDENT. O’GORMAN & YOUNG, INCORPORATED, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT, RESPONDENT.
    Argued February 19, 1929
    Decided May 20, 1929.
    
      For the appellant, Pilgrim & Bitger.
    
    For the respondents, Lum, Tamblyn & Colyer.
    
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion by Judge Dungan in the Circuit Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 8.

For reversal — Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Van Buskiek, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 6.