Case ID: njl_81/html/0575-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THOMAS A. RYER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. HAMILTON W. WINTER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
    Submitted December 5, 1910
    Decided March 6, 1911.
    On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 18 Froom 141.
    For the plaintiff in error, Herrmann & Steelman.
    
    For the defendant in error, James Benny.
    
   Per Curiam.

The decision rendered by the Supreme Court in this ease has already been disapproved by this court in Sadler v. Young, 49 Vroom 594, 597. For the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Chief Justice in the latter case, the judgment of the Supreme Court in the ease now under review will be reversed, and the judgment of the District Court in favor of the plaintiff in error will be affirmed, with costs, in this court and in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—None.

For reversal—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garríson, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Voorhees, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Congdon, Sullivan, JJ. 12.