Case ID: njl_114/html/0156-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MARY STELIGA ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. THE METROPOLITAN CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, APPELLANT.
    Submitted October 26, 1934
    Decided January 10, 1935.
    For the respondents, Kenneth G. Gaughman.
    
    For the appellant, Marie Townsend, Jr.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Yah Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.