Case ID: sw2d_931/html/0908-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Gary ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant. Gary ROBINSON, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.
    Nos. 66861, 69178.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Sept. 17, 1996.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 29,1996.
    Deborah B. Wafer, Dist. Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Blegen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of one count of manufacture of a controlled substance, § 195.211, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to a term of ten years’ imprisonment as a prior and persistent offender. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).