Case ID: so2d_578/html/0052-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Kevin Antonio DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 90-00107.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    April 19, 1991.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David R. Gemmer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant contends his sentencing as an habitual offender was invalid because it was based on two prior convictions of the same date. Walker v. State, 567 So.2d 546 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). As the second supplemental record shows, this was not the case.

Affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and CAMPBELL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.