Case ID: fla_113/html/0258-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Marianna Lime Products Co., et al., v. State, for the Use and Benefit of G. D. Hilton.
    151 So. 379.
    Special Division A.
    Opinion Filed December 15, 1933.
    
      Thomas Sale, for Plaintiffs in Error;
    
      Thos. E. Walker, for Defendant in Error.
   Per Curiam.

This Cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Cotirt that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same .is hereby affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.