Case ID: f-appx_84/html/0291-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles M. CASSELL, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Thomas J. Shields, Plaintiff, v. Sargeant NORRIS; Lieutenant Oneal; Captain Whelman; Nurse Hart, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 03-6714.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 7, 2003.
    Decided Dec. 23, 2003.
    Charles M. Cassell, III, Appellant pro se.
    Before TRAXLER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM.

Charles M. Cassell, III, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cassell v. Sargeant Norris, No. CA-02-943-5H (E.D.N.C. filed Apr. 18, 2003 & entered Apr. 21, 2003). We also deny all of Cassell’s pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED