Case ID: a2d_934/html/0695-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Brian RAAB, Appellee.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    Nov. 20, 2007.
    
      Karen Ann Diaz, Esq., Diane E. Gibbons, Esq., Doylestown, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
    Neils C. Eriksen, Jr., Esq., for Brian Raab.
    BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, BALDWIN and FITZGERALD, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of November, 2007, the order of the Superior Court is REVERSED. See Commonwealth v. Dickerson, 468 Pa. 599, 364 A.2d 677, 682 (1976) (stating “hearsay evidence is considered valid information in testing probable cause to arrest”); see also Commonwealth v. Stokes, 480 Pa. 38, 389 A.2d 74, 77 (1978); Pa.R.E. 104(a).