Case ID: f-appx_14/html/0925-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Clarence HAYWOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FERGUSON, Circuit Judge; Rymer, Circuit Judge; and Hawkins, Circuit Judge, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 00-56911.
    D.C. No. CY-00-07569-CAS.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted July 9, 2001.
    
    Decided July 23, 2001.
    Before KOZINSKI, T.G. NELSON and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Clarence Haywood appeals pro se the district court’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of his complaint brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) against three Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Judges, based upon their denial of his application to file a second or successive habeas corpus petition.

Because Judges Ferguson, Rymer and Hawkins are entitled to absolute judicial immunity from Haywood’s suit, dismissal was proper. Ashelman v. Pope, 793 F.2d 1072, 1075-76, 1078 (9th Cir.1986) (en banc).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.