Case ID: f-appx_709/html/0162-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "AMBRO, Circuit Judge", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America v. Keith BECK, Appellant
    No. 17-1709
    United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
    Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) January 16, 2018
    (Opinion filed: January 26, 2018)
    Rebecca R. Haywood, Esq., Laura S. Irwin, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Steven C. Townsend, Esq., Eddy DeLu-ca Gravina & Townsend, Pittsburgh, PA, for Defendant-Appellant
    Before: AMBRO, RESTREPO, and FUENTES, Circuit Judges
   OPINION

AMBRO, Circuit Judge

The Government met its burden of proving Beck violated the conditions of release on the basis of the positive drug test on January 11, 2017. See U.S.S.G. § 7B1.1. That test was listed on the Government’s pre-hearing petition, thus any further notice deficiencies cannot amount to clear error for lack of prejudice. See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 734, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993). The District Court’s judgment revoking Beck’s supervised release is affirmed. 
      
       This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.