Case ID: so2d_827/html/1104-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Carlos MORAES, Appellant, v. CITY OF MIAMI, A Municipal Corporation, State of Florida, by and through its Department of Transportation and Traffic Control Devices, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Homestead Concrete & Drainage, Inc., a Florida Corporation, f/k/a Homestead Concrete & Drywall, Appellees.
    No. 3D02-177.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Oct. 16, 2002.
    Michael R. Miller, Orlando, and Gail Scopinich, North Miami Beach, for appellant.
    Carman, Beauchamp & Sang, Deerfield Beach, and Rhea P. Grossman, Miami, for appellee Traffic Control Devices, Inc.
    
      George, Hartz, Lundeen & Fulmer and Michael L. Glass, Coral Gables, for appel-lee Homestead Concrete.
    Before COPE, LEVY and GREEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

As the evidence is clear that the appel-lees had not taken physical possession of the work site and had not begun construction on it, the summary judgment is affirmed. See Verges v. Pacheco & Sons, Inc., 822 So.2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Cruz v. Gables Colony, Ltd., 579 So.2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

Affirmed.