Case ID: ny3d_27/html/1144-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[57 NE3d 1095, 37 NYS3d 58]
    The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nadine Panton, Appellant.
    Argued June 2, 2016;
    decided June 30, 2016
    APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York City {Robin Nichinsky of counsel), for appellant.
    
      Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York City {David P. Stromes of counsel), and Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx {Joseph N. Ferdenzi, Peter D. Coddington and T Charles Won of counsel), for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant contends that police engaged in improper pre-Miranda custodial interrogation and, as a result, her post- Miranda written and video statements should have been suppressed. Because defendant did not raise this particular ground either in her suppression motion or at the hearing, it is unpre-served for our review (see People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 887, 888 [1982]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit.

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.

Order affirmed, in a memorandum.