Case ID: f3d_213/html/1221-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jesus ESCOBAR-GRIJALVA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
    No. 98-71469.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    June 20, 2000.
    Before: PREGERSON, NOONAN, and O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.
   ORDER

The opinion filed on March 24, 2000 is amended as follows:

Slip opinion, p. 3469, sec. [4]. After ¶ 1 [206 F.3d at 1335, following the fifth paragraph], add:

The INS contends that Escobar did not raise the denial of her statutory right to counsel in a timely fashion. But her claim of counsel so ineffective in assisting her that it deprived the administrative proceeding of due process encompassed the denial of the statutory right; the latter denial was the foundation of what followed. We decide the appeal on this narrower, statutory basis. See Rios-Berrios v. INS, 776 F.2d 859, 862 (9th Cir.1985).