Case ID: nh_115/html/0137-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hillsborough
    No. 6984
    State of New Hampshire v. Ralph Crossen
    March 31, 1975
    
      Warren B. Rudman, attorney general, and Edward N. Damon, attorney, by brief for the State.
    
      
      Ralph Crossen, pro se, by brief.
   Memorandum Opinion

Defendant was convicted in a jury trial in which he was represented by counsel of two counts of selling a controlled drug. Defendant’s exceptions were reserved and transferred by Cann, J-

A review of the transcript does not support the claim of the defendant that he did not receive a fair trial. The claim that newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial should be addressed to the superior court. RSA 491:7 (Supp. 1973); State v. Long, 90 N.H. 103, 107, 4 A.2d 865, 868 (1939).

Exceptions overruled.