Case ID: sw2d_924/html/0049-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jesse SCOTT, Appellant.
    No. WD 51227.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
    June 18, 1996.
    Emmett D. Queener, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
    Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and HANNA and SPINDEN, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted Jesse Scott of possessing marijuana and cocaine while being held in prison. He asserts that the circuit court plainly erred by requiring him to wear restraints at trial. He also asks us to review the prosecutor’s closing argument as plain error. We do not find plain error in either case and, therefore, do not review the unpre-served issues pursuant to Rule 30.20. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).