Case ID: nj-eq_128/html/0180-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anna Helen Silakoski, petitioner-appellant, v. John C. Silakoski, defendant-respondent.
    [Submitted May term, 1940.
    Decided October 10th, 1940.]
    
      Mr. David I. Stepacof, for the petitioner-appellant.
    
      Mr. Stephen F. Somogyi, for the defendant-respondent.
   Pee Curiam.

The wife appeals from a decree dismissing her petition for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. The facts as found by the learned advisory master, who heard the testimony and observed the witnesses, find an abundance of support in the record before us. His conclusions were filed February 2d, 1940.

The decree is affirmed.

For affirmance — -The Ciiiee-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hei-ier, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, JJ. 13.

For reversal — -Hone.