Case ID: fla_77/html/0221-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. I. Gowin, Appellant, v. H. F. Atkinson and R. F. Burdine, Doing Business Under the Firm Name of Atkinson & Burdine, the Coe-Mortimer Company, a Foreign Corporation, B. F. Lasseter, E. J. Lasseter and Gus Lasseter, Appellees.
    
    Opinion filed March 4, 1919.
    Petition for rehearing denied April 10, 1919.
    An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; H. Pierre Branning, Judge.
    Decree reversed.
    
      Penny & Penny, for Appellant;
    
      Bart A. Riley and' Rose á RoMneau, for Appellees.
   Per Curiam.

— A bill of complaint to set aside a sale of pledged personal property was brought by Gowin. The Court sustained demurrers to the bill and complainant appealed.

The allegations of the bill as to the circumstances of the sale and the price bid and accepted do not wholly fail to state an equity for appropriate relief; and considerations of justice require the defendants to answer the material allegations showing equity.

Decree reversed.

Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Whitfield, Ellis and West, J. J., concur.