Case ID: f-appx_317/html/0687-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Thomas T. ALFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. I.D. CLAY, Warden of SCC, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 08-17485.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 23, 2009.
    
    Filed March 9, 2009.
    Thomas T. Alford, Vacaville, CA, pro se.
    
      Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, HAWKINS and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

On June 3, 2008, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations that appellant’s complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim. On June 30, 2008, the Magistrate Judge vacated his earlier recommendation of dismissal and granted appellant an extension of time to file an amended complaint. Appellant filed an amended complaint as directed on July 31, 2008. On September 29, 2008, 2008 WL 4490060, the district court adopted the June 3, 2008 findings and recommendations, which had been vacated by the Magistrate Judge. This appears to have been an oversight. Because the Magistrate Judge vacated his initial recommendation and because appellant filed an amended complaint as directed, we remand to the district court to consider the amended complaint filed on July 31, 2008.

REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.