Case ID: f-appx_547/html/0359-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James D. WILKES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DR. Inerio ALARCON; United States Bureau of Prisons, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 13-6967.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.
    Decided: Dec. 9, 2013.
    James D. Wilkes, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

James D. Wilkes appeals the district court’s order adopting as modified the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wilkes v. Alarcon, No. 1:11-cv-00131IMK-JSK, 2013 WL 2237861 (N.D.W.Va. May 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.