Case ID: ad_230/html/0708-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rose A. Fried, Respondent, v. Samuel D. Fried, Appellant.
   Order denying defendant’s motion to vacate notice of examination before trial reversed upon the law, without costs, amd motion granted, without costs, upon the authority of Safrin v. Safrin (205 App. Div. 628); Horsch v. Horsch (206 id. 710) and Hutaff v. Hutaff (208 id. 745). Linnekin v. Linnekin (96 Misc. 56) is contrary to the weight of authority and should not be followed. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.