Case ID: f-appx_42/html/0994-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael MADDOX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G & G PRODUCE CO., INC.; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 01-56980.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Aug. 12, 2002 .
    Decided Aug. 22, 2002.
    Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Michael Maddox appeals the district court’s dismissal of his employment discrimination action for lack of prosecution and its denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, Oliva v. Sullivan, 958 F.2d 272, 273 (9th Cir.1992), and we vacate and remand.

The district court abused its discretion when it sua sponte dismissed Maddox’s action for failure to appear at a pre-trial conference. See Oliva, 958 F.2d at 274. The district court did not warn Maddox of imminent dismissal, and there is no indication the court considered less drastic sanctions. See id. Further, we note that Maddox filed a timely opposition to a defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the same day the district court dismissed for failure to prosecute. Accordingly, we vacate the dismissal and remand for further proceedings.

VACATED AND REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.