Case ID: so2d_346/html/0082-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David F. STEVENSON and Carolyn E. Stevenson, Appellants, v. Mary Nell HAYS, Appellee.
    No. DD-453.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    March 25, 1977.
    Rehearing Denied April 29, 1977.
    O. E. Adams, Sr., Pensacola, for appellants.
    Eric C. Eggen, Pensacola, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal having been found to be without substantial merit, the appeal is dismissed.

BOYER, C. J., and. MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

ORDER ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Appellants’ petition for rehearing states that this court’s per curiam affirmance decision was in error because the order under which appellant David F. Stevenson was incarcerated on five occasions was “totally without merit” since the order as referred to in the petition does not provide in any manner for a hearing prior to the incarceration and it was unconstitutionally void inasmuch as it provides for incarceration without appellant David Stevenson being first brought before a committing magistrate. The order referred to in appellants’ petition was entered June 13, 1972. This order was not the subject of appellants’ interlocutory appeal. Appellants’ notice of appeal was filed from the court’s order of September 3, 1976, wherein their counterclaim was dismissed with prejudice from the final order denying motion for rehearing dated September 23,1976. The petition for rehearing is denied.

BOYER, C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.