Case ID: njl_102/html/0442-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FILOMENA MIGLIACCIO, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC., APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC SERVICE RAILWAY COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
    Argued October 30, 1925
    Decided March 26, 1926.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 101 N. J. L. 496.
    For the appellant, Lazarus, Brenner & Vickers.
    
    For the respondent, Leonard J. Tynan.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Eatzenbach in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 6.

For reversal — Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, JJ. 4.