Case ID: so2d_762/html/1034-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Reinaldo VALDEZ, Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED PROPERTY AND CASUALTY, etc., et al., Appellees.
    No. 3D99-2353.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 26, 2000.
    Michael I. Libman, Miami, for appellant.
    Buckner & Shifrin, Miami; Lauri Wald-man Ross, Miami, for appellees.
    Before JORGENSON and SORONDO, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge
   PER CURIAM.

Valdez appeals a final judgment voiding his insurance policy. For the following reasons, we affirm.

The insurance .policy contained a valid provision voiding the policy upon intentional concealment or misrepresentation by the insured. See Wong Ken v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 685 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (clause which voids coverage for intentional misrepresentation is valid and enforceable). The jury found that Valdez violated that provision. Therefore, the trial court properly voided the insurance policy.

AFFIRMED.