Case ID: f-appx_655/html/0165-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cory MCKENSTRY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-6392
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 21, 2016
    Decided: July 22, 2016
    Cory McKenstry, Appellant Pro Se. Debra Lynn Dwyer, Allen F. Loucks, James Thomas Wallner, Angela R. White, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cory McKenstry appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Because McKenstry’s Sentencing Guidelines range was not based on drug quantity, Amendment 782 does not lower the applicable Guidelines range. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. McKenstry, No. 1:05-cr-00281-JFM-1 (D. Md. Feb. 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court, and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED