Case ID: misc_27/html/0050-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Giegerich, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Morris Petschaft, Plaintiff, v. Nathan Lubow, Defendant.
    (Supreme Court, New York Special Term,
    March, 1899.)
    Order of arrest—Not vacated for service of defective, copies.
    Where the original papers for an order of arrest are not defective, the order will not be vacated merely because the copies served on the defendant did not contain a jurat or verification. ' '
    Motion to vacate an order of arrest,
    Goldfogle, Cohn & Lind, for motion.
    W. N. Loew, opposed.
   Giegerich, J.

The order of arrest is assailed solely upon the ground that the copies of the papers-served Upon the defendant at the time of arrest did not contain a jurat or verification. The original papers were not defective, and the order cannot be vacated for defects in the copies. Barker v. Cook, 40 Barb. 254; Bank of Havana v. Moore, 5 Hun, 624. Motion denied, but without costs.

Motion denied, without costs.