Case ID: f-appx_500/html/0953-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

eBAY INC. and Microsoft Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Cabelas Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KELORA SYSTEMS, LLC, Defendant-Appellant. Kelora Systems, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Target Corporation, Amazon.com, Inc., Office Depot, Inc., Costco Wholesale Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Company, Audible, Inc., and Zappos.com, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and Dell, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and Newegg Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
    Nos. 2012-1474, 2012-1475, 2012-1476.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    March 19, 2013.
    Robert D. Becker, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, of Palo Alto, CA, argued for the defendant-appellant, Kelora Systems, LLC. With him on the brief were Ronald S. Katz and Shawn G. Hansen.
    Constantine L. Trela, Jr., Sidley Austin, LLP, of Chicago, IL, argued for all plaintiffs-appellees and defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Richard A. Cederoth and Theodore W. Chandler, of Los Angeles, CA, for defendants-appellees, eBay, Inc. et al. Also on the brief were Gregory P. Sitrick, Quarles & Brady LLP, of Phoenix, AZ; Christopher J. Fahy, of Chicago, IL; Jeffrey L. Fillerup, McKen-na Long & Aldridge, LLP, of San Francisco, CA, for defendants-appellees, Cabela’s Inc.; Jonathan S. Franklin, Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P., of Washington, DC; Dan D. Davison, of Dallas, TX; Richard S. Zembek and Daniel S. Leventhal, of Houston, TX; Gilbert A. Greene and Sheila Kadura, of Austin, TX, for defendants-appellees, Target, et al.; Joseph A. Mical-lef and Scott M. Border, Sidley Austin, LLP, of Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee, Dell, Inc.; Kimball R. Anderson and Kathleen B. Barry, of Winston & Strawn LLP, of Chicago, IL; Kent E. Baldauf, Jr., Bryan P. Clark and Daniel H. Brean, The Webb Law Firm, of Pittsburgh, PA, for defendant-appellee, New-egg.
    NEWMAN, PLAGER, and PROST, Circuit Judges.
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.