Case ID: ga-app_28/html/0693-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Jenkins, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

13001.
    Watkins v. Mathis.
   Jenkins, P. J.

The hundred dollars alleged to have been expended for the defendant, at his instance and by his request, in the purchase of a written option constituted a valid claim. . The evidence in his behalf, as set forth by the answer of the magistrate, fully authorized a judgment in’ his favor, and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Decided June 14, 1922.

Certiorari; from Floyd superior court •— J udge Wright. October 4, 1921.

F. W. Copeland, for plaintiff in error. Porter & Mebane, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Hill, JJ., concur.