Case ID: conn_155/html/0707-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Philip J. Langley v. Frederick G. Reincke, Warden, Connecticut State Prison
    Alcorn, House, Cotter, Ryan and Covello, Js.
    Argued December 7
    decided December 19, 1967
    
      Igor I. Sikorsky, Jr., special public defender, for the appellant (plaintiff).
    
      Joseph T. Oormley, Jr., assistant state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, was Otto J. Saur, state’s attorney, for the appellee (defendant).
   Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court dismissing the plaintiff’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. It is the contention of the plaintiff that the rule enunciated in State v. Licari, 153 Conn. 127, 132, 214 A.2d 900, should be applied to invalidate his initial arrest although no timely objection was made and no appeal taken from the 1961 judgment rendered on a jury verdict finding the present plaintiff guilty of the crimes of rape and robbery with violence. This same contention was advanced and decided adversely to the present claims of the plaintiff in Reed v. Reincke, 155 Conn. 591, 599, 236 A.2d 909, and D’Amico v. Reincke, 155 Conn. 627, 629, 236 A.2d 914. For the reasons stated in those opinions we find no error on this appeal.

There is no error.