Case ID: nj-tax_11/html/0087-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "BILDER, J.A.D.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RICHARD L. AND JANET MUTCH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
    Argued January 19, 1989
    Decided February 1, 1989.
    Before Judges GAULKIN and BILDER.
    
      Richard S. Hyland argued the cause for appellants (Myers, Matteo, Rabil, Norcross & Landgraf, attorneys; Mitchell J. Rabil, on the brief).
    
      Jeanne E. Gorrissen, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Benjamin Clarke, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel; Jeanne E. Gorrissen, on the brief).
   The opinion of the court was delivered by

BILDER, J.A.D.

The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed substantially for the reasons given by Judge Lario in his opinion reported at 9 N.J.Tax 612 (1986).