Case ID: so2d_551/html/1024-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Choice Lee CHESSER and Walter Robert Vincent v. T.G. & Y. STORES COMPANY and James Williams.
    88-543.
    Supreme Court of Alabama.
    Sept. 8, 1989.
    Arthur J. Madden III of Madden & Soto, Mobile, for appellants.
    W.J. McDaniel and David L. McAlister of McDaniel, Hall, Conerly & Lusk, Birmingham, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

As to the claim for malicious prosecution, the judgment is affirmed on the authority of Ennis v. Beason, 537 So.2d 17 (Ala.1988); and Alabama Power Co. v. Neighbors, 402 So.2d 958 (Ala.1981). As to the claim for false imprisonment, the judgment is affirmed on the authority of Standard Oil Co. v. Davis, 208 Ala. 565, 94 So. 754 (1922).

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, HOUSTON and KENNEDY, JJ., concur.