Case ID: a2d_871/html/0186-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Dante OVERBY, Appellant.
    Nos. 32 & 33 EAP 2004.
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    April 8, 2005.
    Sondra R. Rodrigues, Esq., Philadelphia, for Dante Overby.
    Hugh J. Burns, Esq., Philadelphia, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
    BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and BAER, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of April, 2005, the Order of the Superior Court is hereby reversed, and the matter is remanded to the Superior Court for a merits review of the issue(s) raised in Appellant’s direct appeal nunc pro tunc. Commonwealth v. Halley, — Pa. -, 870 A.2d 795, 2005 WL 709283 (2005).