Case ID: or-app_78/html/0185-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Argued and submitted January 13,
    decree modified February 26, 1986
    In the Matter of the Marriage of HAMILTON, Respondent, and HAMILTON, Appellant.
    
    (9585; CA A36473)
    714 P2d 285
    Richard E. Forcum, Bend, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Paul J. Speck and Forcum, Parker & Speck, Bend.
    Warren John West, Bend, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.
    Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Newman, Judges.
    PER CURIAM
   PER CURIAM

Wife appeals a decree of dissolution, challenging several of its provisions. On de novo review we affirm the decree with the exception of paragraph 7, which provides:

“Petitioner [husband] shall have a judgment against Respondent [wife] for delinquent mortgage payments in the sum of $1,135.00.”

Husband concedes that the proper amount of the judgment is $900.

Paragraph 7 of the decree is modified by reduction of the judgment to $900; otherwise the decree is affirmed. No costs to either party.