Case ID: ga-app_31/html/0787-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Luke, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

15251.
    Stalnaker v. The State.
    Decided March 6, 1924.
    Indictment for manufacture of liquor; from Wilkes superior court—Judge Sliurley. November 29, 1923.
    
      Clement E. Sutton, for plaintiff in error.
    
      M. L. Felts, solicitor-general, contra.
   Luke, J.

The motion for a new trial complains that the verdict of guilty

was not authorized by the evidence. There is some evidence to authorize the defendant’s conviction, which conviction has the approval of the trial judge. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.