Case ID: cust-ct_32/html/0465-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Ekwall, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Before the Third Division,
    April 22, 1954
    No. 58029.
    protest 129450-K (Minneapolis).
    M. A. Hoenecke v. United States,
   Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the appraisement of the merchandise and the liquidation of the entry were made in the same manner, under facts and circumstances the same in all material respects, as the appraisement and liquidation in The Gruen Watch Company v. United States (24 Cust. Ct. 101, C. D. 1216). In accordance with stipulation and following the tited .authority, it was held that a legal liquidation should be had which would form the basis for a protest in which, should he so desire, the importer may litigate any question presented by such action under section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.