Case ID: f-appx_272/html/0598-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel AGUILAR-BARRAGAN, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 07-30217.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted March 18, 2008.
    
    Filed March 28, 2008.
    Donald E. Kresse, Jr., Esq., USYA— Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Tracy A. Staab, Esq., FPDWA — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Manuel Aguilar-Barragan appeals from the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being an alien in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Aguilar-Barragan contends that his sentence is unreasonable. We conclude that his sentence is reasonable. See Gall v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 597-98, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

Aguilar-Barragan also contends that the district court erred by applying a 16-level Guideline enhancement after finding him removed subsequent to a prior felony conviction. We conclude that any error was harmless. See United States v. Zepeda-Martinez, 470 F.3d 909, 913-14 (9th Cir.2006).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.