Case ID: cust-ct_45/html/0360-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Oliver, C. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 64841.
    Manca, Inc. v. United States,
    protest 58/16331 (New York).
   Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the article in question, described on the invoice as “1 Rangefinder testing device,” is a metal testing device, that it has no optical component parts, and that the device enables the observer to check, for correct position, the rangefinder coupling of a photographic lens, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. United States v. J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc. (30 C.C.P.A. 213, C.A.D. 235), followed.