Case ID: us_365/html/0768-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

VERRET et al. v. OIL TRANSPORT CO., INC., et al.
    No. 388.
    Decided April 17, 1961.
    
      James J. Morrison, Arthur A. de la Houssaye and Raymond H. Kierr for petitioners.
    
      Eberhard P. Deutsch for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

It appearing from the joint suggestion of mootness that, subsequent to the judgment of reversal by the Court of Appeals of the judgment of the District Court and the filing and granting of the petition for writ of certiorari, a consent judgment was entered by the District Court and that said judgment has been satisfied, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to dismiss the appeal as moot.