Case ID: cust-ct_36/html/0450-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Lawrence, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 59965.
    Ore Reduction Company v. United States,
    protest 204796-K (Nogales).
   Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

As to 10 of the 18 entries covered by the protest herein, the provisions of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1514), were not complied with. Accordingly, the protest, insofar as it related to entries 68, 87, 101, 138, 167, 168, and 169, not having been filed within the 60-day statutory period, was dismissed. There being nothing in the record tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification of the collector, the protest was overruled as to entries 132, 144, 155, 156, 246, 265, 344, and 387.