Case ID: ad2d_228/html/0426-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ramapo Police Benevolent Association, on Behalf of Neil Sweeney, Respondent, v Town of Ramapo, Appellant.
    [643 NYS2d 665]
   The language contained in paragraph 3 (c) of the parties’ Memorandum Agreement is ambiguous with regard to whether the 8% midnight shift pay differential applies immediately upon an employee’s return to active duty "after 18 days of combined sick days and LOD absences cumulative or otherwise”. In light of the foregoing, it was improper for the Supreme Court to grant the plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment in its favor (cf., Ñamad v Salomon, Inc., 74 NY2d 751). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Joy, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.