Case ID: nd_52/html/0844-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROGERS LUMBER COMPANY v. JOHN SCHATZEL and Wimbledon Farmers Elevator Company.
    (204 N. W. 856.)
    Opinion filed June 16, 1926.
   Pee Cueiam.

While the facts in this case differ somewhat from the facts in Rogers Lumber Co. v. Schatzel, ante 837, 204 N. W. 854, the case is controlled by the same principles. This is conceded by respective counsel in their briefs. Eor the reasons assigned in the above ease, the judgment in this case is reversed and the cause dismissed.

'ChbistiaNSON, Oh. J., and Biedzell, Nuessle, BueKE, and JohN-soN. JJ., concur.