Case ID: f-appx_89/html/0615-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Enriqueta Rocaela Gramajo CALDERON, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 02-72872.
    Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 17, 2004.
    
    Decided Feb. 23, 2004.
    Suzanne B. Friedman, Attorney at Law, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.
    Regional Counsel, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Regina Byrd, Attorney, Ernesto H. Molina, Jr. DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before FERNANDEZ, W. FLETCHER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Enriqueta Gramajo Calderon, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(a)(7) without opinion an immigration judge’s order of removal and denial of her applications for asylum and withholding of removal. She contends that the streamlining regulations pursuant to which the Board decided her appeal violate due process and are void for vagueness. This contention is foreclosed by Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 850-52 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.