Case ID: minn_168/html/0436-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Dibell, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

DEAN S. RUNDLETT v. BANKERS NATIONAL BANK.
    
    October 8, 1926.
    No. 25,487.
    Case followed.
    The answer stated a defense, following Rundlett v. Midland National Bank & Trust Company, supra, page 434.
    Plaintiff appealed from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Salmon, J., overruling his demurrer to the answer in an action upon a cashier’s check.
    Affirmed.
    
      L. K. Eaton and 8elover, Schultz, Mansfield & Bryan, for appellant.
    
      Deutsch, Loeffler & Amide, Brill & Maslon and Robert 8 Eolliner, for respondent.
    
      
       Reported in 210 N. W. 631.
    
   Dibell, J.

The demurrer of the plaintiff to the answer of the defendant was overruled and he' appeals.

The facts are substantially those alleged in the case of the same plaintiff against the Midland National Bank & Trust Company, supra, page 434, except that Henderson received payment of the cashier’s check issued by the Midland bank from the defendant, which later received payment from the Midland bank through the clearings. As in the case cited there is no merit in the demurrer.

Order affirmed.

Holt, J., took no part.