Case ID: njl_101/html/0407-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, APPELLANT, v. KEUFFEL & ESSER CO. ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
    Submitted February 9, 1925
    Decided March 10, 1925.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam, is printed in 8 N. J. Mis. B. 505.
    For the appellant, John J. Fallon and Horace L. Allen.
    
    For the respondents, Pierson & Schroeder and Hopkins & Iierr.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Min-turn, Kaliscii, Black, Katzendach, Lloyd, White, Gardner, A7an Buskiric, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.