Case ID: njl_92/html/0631-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HYATT ROLLER BEARING COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Submitted December 9, 1918
    Decided February 6, 1919.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 92 N. J. L. 94.
    Eor the respondent, Day, Day, Smith & Slingerland.
    
    For the appellant, Vredenburgh, Wall & Carey.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Mint urn in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.