Case ID: f-appx_458/html/0235-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Christopher Jay DUDLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. 4-McCAR-T, INCORPORATED; McDonald’s, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 11-1481.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Nov. 30, 2011.
    Decided: Dec. 15, 2011.
    Christopher Jay Dudley, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Robert Becker, Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Washington, D.C.; Steven R. Miller, Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Cincinnati, Ohio; Adam J. Rocco, Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Columbus, Ohio; Gregory Branch Robertson, Hunton & Williams, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Jay Dudley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dudley v. 4-McCar-T, Inc., No. 7:09-cv-00520-sgw-mfu, 2011 WL 1742184 (W.D.Va. May 4, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.