Case ID: ill-app_26/html/0415-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Quriam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The Singer Manufacturing Company v. William A. Price.
    The comparative credibility of the witnesses is a question for the jury.
    [Opinion filed November 18, 1887.]
    Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jersey County; the Hon. Gr. W. Herman, Judge, presiding.
    Messrs. Warren & Pogue and Taylor & Poll and, for appellants.
    
      Messrs. Goodbioh & Ferns, for appellee.
   Per Quriam.

In the court below appellee recovered a judgment on the verdict for $39.20, being the amount, with interest, which he had paid the company on its contract to deliver him a specified style of sewing machine, and which he testified they refused to deliver. Their agent, on the contrary, testified that the one plaintiff said they let him have temporarily until they could send the one contracted for, was the one he contracted for. It seems the jury believed the plaintiff. The abstract shows no instruction, nor much else. Of the comparative credibility of the witnesses, it was for the jury to judge.

Judgment affirmed.