Case ID: njl_87/html/0685-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CARLSTADT NATIONAL BANK, RESPONDENT, v. BOROUGH OF WOOD RIDGE, APPELLANT.
    Argued March 15, 1915-
    Decided June 14, 1915.
    On appeal from the Supreme Court.
    .For the respondent, Robert H. McCarter (Luce & Kipp on the brief).
    For the appellant, George L. Record (John M. Bell on the brief).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, for reasons stated in the opinion in Carlstadt National Bank v. Borough of Little Ferry, just decided (ante p. 546).

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Harrison, Swayze, Tkenchard, Parker, Bergen, Mixturn, Tí aliso». Black, Ahiedexburgh, White, Teehuxe, Hkfi'KXHKIMER, JJ. 14.

For reversal—Hone.