Case ID: cust-ct_61/html/0645-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Richardson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Before the Third Division,
    September 3, 1968
    No. P68/380.
    protest 66/76292 (New York).
    Ruth A. Kunstler Executrix for the Estate of Adolph Kunstler v. United States,
   Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of certain diamond gemstones, cut and polished in the United States, exported without benefit of drawback, and returned without having been advanced in value or improved in condition, and that the applicable customs regulations have been complied with, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. Bertrand Freres, Inc., et al. v. United States (47 Cust. Ct. 155, C.D. 2296).