Case ID: f-appx_345/html/0956-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Clinton Wade DUNSON, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-11374
    Conference Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Oct. 2, 2009.
    Mark L. Nichols, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Room 9A10, Federal Public Defender’s Office Noi’thern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
   ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM:

This case returns to us on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. The Supreme Court vacated our judgment and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Arizona v. Gant, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1710, 173 L.Ed.2d 485 (2009). We retain jurisdiction of the appeal and remand for the limited purpose of having the district court conduct an evidentiary hearing and whatever other proceedings it deems appropriate for a determination on the issue of inevitable discovery. See United States v. Casper, 332 Fed.Appx. 222, 223 (5th Cir.2009); see also United States v. Runyan, 275 F.3d 449, 466-67 (5th Cir.2001).

REMANDED. 
      
       Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.