Case ID: misc_33/html/0793-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Schuchman, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael Brady, Respondent, v. The Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Appellant.
    Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and from an order denying the defendant’s motion for a new'trial.
    Henry A. Bobinson (John T. Little, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.
    Logan, Demond & Harby (M. E. Harby and Arthur Wopp, of counsel), for respondent.
   Schuchman, J.

The only point urged by appellant to effect a reversal of the judgment is, that the court erred in charging “ That if, while the passenger is getting off the car, the jury find that the car is started suddenly so as to produce a jerking motion, it is in itself an act of carelessness and negligence.”

This was not error. Bennett v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 40 App. Div. 626; Roberts v. Johnson, 58 N. Y. 613; Schalscha v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 19 Misc. Rep. 141.

Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

McCarthy, J., concurs.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.