Case ID: so2d_495/html/0876-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Riley Bernard SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 86-552.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
    Oct. 9, 1986.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Christopher S. Quarles, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joseph N. D’Achille, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

None of the reasons for departing from the presumptive guideline sentence given by the lower court in this case presents a valid basis for departure. See Scurry v. State, 489 So.2d 25 (Fla.1986); Dixon v. State, 492 So.2d 410 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986) and Kirk v. State, 490 So.2d 176 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). Thus, this case is remanded for resentencing within the presumptive guideline range.

REMANDED.

ORFINGER, COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.