Case ID: sw3d_571/html/0700-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jason E. BROWNLEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 106469
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: April 16, 2019
    FOR APPELLANT: Kevin B. Gau, Assistant Public Defender, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
    FOR RESPONDENT: Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
    Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

Jason E. Brownlee appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).