Case ID: cal-app_71/html/0799-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "CRAIG, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[Civ. No. 4938.
    Second- Appellate District, Division, Two.
    March 7, 1925.]
    EMMA HOOPES et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY et al., Respondents.
    
       Justice’s Court—Appeal—Delay in Bringing to Trial.—Peremptory writ of mandamus granted upon authority of Hoopes v. Superior Court, ante, p. 564.
    PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel the dismissal of a Justice’s Court appeal.
    Peremptory writ granted.
    The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
    Thos. H. Cornett for Petitioners.
    Gerecht & Hall, E. P. Gerecht and C. W. Hall for Respondents.
   CRAIG, J.

Petitioners herein were defendants in an action commenced in the justice’s court of Los Angeles township by one Jay Smith. Otherwise the record before us in this proceeding is the same in all respects as that presented in Hoopes v. Superior Court, ante, p. 564 [235 Pac. 739.]

The questions involved herein have been discussed and decided in the opinion filed in case numbered 4939 {ante, p. 564).

The peremptory writ of mandate is therefore -granted, and the Superior Court is directed to dismiss the appeal.

Finlayson, P. J., and Works, J., concurred.