Case ID: ohio-st-3d_118/html/0445-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Swaisgood, Appellee, v. Puder et al.; Verizon North, Inc., Appellant.
    [Cite as Swaisgood v. Puder, 118 Ohio St.3d 445, 2008-Ohio-3177.]
    (No. 2007-0442
    Submitted May 21, 2008
    Decided July 2, 2008.)
    Murray & Murray Co., L.P.A., Charles M. Murray, and William H. Bartle, for appellee.
    Thompson Hiñe, L.L.P., Andrew H. Cox, and William J. Hubbard, for appellant.
   {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Turner v. Ohio Bell Tel. Co., 118 Ohio St.3d 215, 2008-Ohio-2010, 887 N.E.2d 1158.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

O’Donnell, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Turner v. Ohio Bell Tel. Co.