Case ID: nys_149/html/1069-07.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. ROBSON and MERRELL, JJ.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ARROLL, Respondent, v. BUFFALO, L. & R. RY. CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    October 22, 1914.)
    Action by James T. Arroll against the Buffalo, Lockport & Rochester Railway Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. See, also, 160 App. Div. 915, 145 N. Y. Supp. 1112.

ROBSON and MERRELL, JJ.,

dissent, upon the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence, and upon the further ground that the court committed reversible error in permitting the plaintiff to testify under defendant’s objection that the defendant’s claim agent Hoenig called upon him after the accident.