Case ID: f-appx_18/html/0177-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Clarence Edward ALEXANDER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; Bureau of Prisons; Mickey E. Ray, Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 01-6725.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 6, 2001.
    Decided Sept. 13, 2001.
    Clarence Edward Alexander, pro se.
    Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Clarence Edward Alexander appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Alexander v. United States Dep’t of Justice, No. CA-00-392-2-11AJ (D.S.C. Feb. 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.