Case ID: ohio-st-3d_110/html/0157-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pfeifer, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John Doe No. 1 et al., Appellants, v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati, 110 Ohio St.3d 157, 2006-Ohio-4087.]
    
      (No. 2005-0262
    Submitted June 20, 2006
    Decided August 23, 2006.)
    Kircher Law Office, L.L.C., and Konrad Kircher, for appellants.
    Dinsmore & Shohl, L.L.P., Mark A. Vander Laan, and Kirk M. Wall, for appellees Archdiocese of Cincinnati and Archbishop Daniel Pilarczyk.
    Stephen J. Wenke, for appellee Lawrence Strittmatter.
   {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati 109 Ohio St.3d 491, 2006-Ohio-2625, 849 N.E.2d 268.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Resnick and Lanzinger, JJ., not participating.

Pfeifer, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 2} I dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati, 109 Ohio St.3d 491, 2006-Ohio-2625, 849 N.E.2d 268, ¶ 56-76.