Case ID: ga-app_23/html/0105-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

9810.
    Daniel v. Keen.
    Decided November 23, 1918.
    Appeal; from Laurens superior court—Judge Kent. May 7, 1918.
    
      Hal B. Wimberly, for plaintiff.
    
      T. E. Hightower, for defendant.
   Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial in this case is not in the record. However, the bill of exceptions, duly certified, recite^ that the motion for a new trial was submitted on the general grounds only. There is evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and this court can not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., concurs. Stephens, J., not presiding.