Case ID: f-appx_375/html/0727-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Estela PEREZ VAZQUEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 06-74634.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted April 5, 2010.
    
    Filed April 13, 2010.
    David T. Acalin, D. Jade Mundel, Marks & Acalin, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.
    Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Estela Perez Vazquez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Gomez-Lopez v. Ashcroft, 393 F.3d 882, 884 (9th Cir.2005). We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Ramos v. INS, 246 F.3d 1264, 1266 (9th Cir.2001). We deny the petition for review.

The agency appropriately placed the burden on Perez Vazquez to establish eligibility for relief from removal, and substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Perez Vazquez failed to meet her burden to establish eligibility for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(e)(4).

Perez Vazquez’s claim that the IJ prematurely terminated proceedings after she invoked her Fifth Anendment rights is not supported by the record.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.