Case ID: f-appx_668/html/0302-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ricardo SALAS-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 14-72007
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted August 16, 2016 
    
    Filed August 23, 2016
    
      Ricardo Salas-Hernandez, Las Vegas, NV, Pro Se.
    Stefanie N. Hennes, Trial Attorney, OIL, Washington, DC,' Chief Counsel ICE, San Francisco, CA.
    Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. 
        See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Ricardo Salas-Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order granting post-conclusion voluntary departure. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Salas-Hernandez’ unexhausted contentions that his former counsel provided ineffective assistance, and that the IJ forced his former counsel to withdraw Salas-Hernandez’ application for cancellation of removal. See Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (the court lacks jurisdiction to consider legal claims not presented in an alien’s administrative proceedings before the agency).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. 
      
       phis disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.