Case ID: so2d_429/html/0778-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. HUBBART, Judge", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Diane D. LESLIE, Appellant, v. Eli Y. LESLIE, Appellee.
    Nos. 82-45, 82-1088.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 12, 1983.
    Mason & Meyerson and Jill Touby, Miami, for appellant.
    Gary S. Gostel, Miami, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUB-BART and NESBITT, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

HUBBART, Judge

(concurring in part; dissenting in part).

I concur in the court’s decision to affirm the final judgment on the main appeal. I dissent, however, from the court’s decision on the cross-appeal to affirm that portion of the final judgment [i.e., paragraph 3] which determines the method by which the husband’s special equity in the marital residence should be satisfied. Duncan v. Duncan, 379 So.2d 949, 952 (Fla.1980); Starcher v. Starcher, 391 So.2d 340, 341 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Leonard v. Leonard, 389 So.2d 256, 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), pet. for rev. den., 399 So.2d 1144 (Fla.1981); see also Rutkin v. Rutkin, 345 So.2d 400, 401 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), and cases collected therein.