Case ID: so2d_608/html/0940-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Arthur BREAKSTONE and Julie Breakstone, his wife, Appellants, v. LODGING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Georgia corporation f/k/a Consolidated Energy Systems Inc., Appellees.
    No. 92-276.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 1, 1992.
    Greenspoon, Marder, Hirschfeld & Raf-kin, and Leonard Lubart, and Michael Marder, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
    Michael F. Kelley, Miami, for appellees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Relying on Robert B. Ehmann, Inc. v. Bergh, 363 So.2d 613 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), the trial court denied appellants’ motion to implead a third-party defendant in proceedings supplementary. Because Exceletech, Inc. v. Williams, 597 So.2d 275 (Fla.1992), overruled Ehmann, we reverse the trial court’s denial of the motion to implead, and remand for further proceedings not inconsistent with Exceletech.

Reversed and remanded.