Case ID: f2d_354/html/0240-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard JOHNSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
    No. 19711.
    United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
    Jan. 5, 1966.
    George Haslett, Jr., Portland, Or., for appellant.
    Sidney I. Lezak, U. S. Atty., Charles H. Habernigg, Asst. U. S. Atty., Norman Sepenuk, U. S. Atty., Portland, Or., for appellee.
    Before BARNES, KOELSCH and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

On consideration of the appeal, we find a strictly factual issue was determined in the District Court adverse to appellant. Under well-known rules governing our examination of evidence on an appeal, the evidence supports the trial court’s determination, and we affirm.

The above affirmance renders appellant’s request for bail moot, and therefore the request for bail is dismissed.