Case ID: minn_181/html/0517-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HARRY S. COATES v. PAUL M. HOLDEN.
    
    November 21, 1930.
    No. 28,350.
    
      E. T. (Jhesnut, for relator.
    
      R. B. Brower, for respondent.
    
      
       Reported in 233 N. W. 9.
    
   Per Curiam.

The venue of this transitory action, commenced in Hennepin county, was, pursuant to statute (G. S. 1923 [2 Mason, 19271 § 9215) summarily changed to Stearns county. There plaintiff moved to remand to Hennepin and submitted affidavits in support of his claim that when the action ivas commenced defendant was a resident of Hennepin. Defendant made a contrary showing and thereby raised an issue of fact, which will not be reviewed here.

In such a case our examination of the record goes only to the extent of determining Avhether there was an issue of fact. If there is one, the decision of the district court is final. State ex rel. Perkins v. District Court, 155 Minn. 505, 193 N. W. 169; State ex rel. Ryan v. A. Guthrie & Co. Inc. 164 Minn. 525, 205 N. W. 448.

The alternative writ of mandamus should be discharged.

So ordered.