Case ID: f-appx_265/html/0684-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Antonio CALLES-MEDINA, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 06-10737.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Jan. 14, 2008.
    
    Filed Feb. 1, 2008.
    Munish Sharda, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Evo A. Deconcini U.S. Courthouse, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Peter Eric Herberg, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: HALL, O’SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Jose Antonio Calles-Medina appeals from his 37-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea to illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Calles-Medina contends that the district court erred by granting a 30-day continuance of the sentencing hearing so that the government could submit appropriate documentation to establish an aggravated-felony enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(B). We conclude that the district court did not act unreasonably or arbitrarily in granting the continuance. See United States v. Lopez-Patino, 391 F.3d 1034, 1038-39 (9th Cir.2004) (per curiam); cf. United States v. Pimentel-Flores, 339 F.3d 959, 969 (9th Cir.2003).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.