Case ID: nj-eq_103/html/0022-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charlotta E. Ostrom et al., complainants, v. Warren Ferris, defendants.
    [Decided May 14th, 1928.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.
    On appeal of Charlotta Marie Keifer.
    
      Messrs. Roberson & Roberson, for the complainants.
    
      Mr. William P. Martin and Messrs. Butler & Butler, for the defendants.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baches, and reported in 99 N. J. Eq. 551.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trbnchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McG-lennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.