Case ID: so2d_183/html/0858-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Curtis HUNT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 65-818.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
    March 15, 1966.
    Curtis Hunt, in pro. per.
    Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Barry Semet, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
    Before PIENDRY, C. J., and CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

By this appeal, we are required to review the propriety of an order denying a motion seeking relief, pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix.

It appears that this is the second motion for such relief filed in the trial court by the appellant, and it contains substantially the same grounds as that considered by the court in the original motion and, therefore, no error has been made to appear in the trial court’s summarily disposing of same. See: Manning v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 616; Rankin v. State, Fla.App.1964, 168 So.2d 324.

Affirmed.