Case ID: dc_3/html/0176-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William Hollenback v. Michael Miller & Wife.
    Trover will not lie against husband and wife for a conversion to her use only.
    In trover, the declaration stated that the defendants, (husband and wife,) converted the goods “ to her own use.”
    
      Mr. J. Dunlop,
    moved in arrest of judgment, that there cannot be a conversion to the use of the wife during the coverture. 2 Saund. 47, note; Rhemes v. Humphreys, Cro. Car. 254; Perry v. Diggs, Cro. Car. 494.
   Judgment arrested (nem. con.) for that reason.