Case ID: misc2d_124/html/0759-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

437 Palisade Avenue Realty Corp., Respondent, v Mary Boyd, Appellant.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
    May 15, 1984
    APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Ecker & Ecker {Lawrence H. Ecker and Joan Iacono of counsel), for appellant. Farrauto, Berman & Fontana {John P. Farrauto of counsel), for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment affirmed, without costs.

Since the stipulation was entered into on the record, on the advice of counsel, and in settlement of a bona fide dispute, the “no-waiver” provisions of section 11 of the Emergency Tenant Protection Act (L 1974, ch 576, § 4) and section 2500.12 of the Emergency Tenant Protection Regulations (9 NYCRR) are not applicable (see Matter of Matinzi v Joy, 60 NY2d 835; Hill v Wek Capital Corp., 4 AD2d 615; Rega v Joy, NYLJ, Aug. 25, 1982, p 11, col 1). Furthermore, the circumstances are not such as to warrant relieving tenant from the terms of the stipulation (see Hill v Wek Capital Corp., supra).

Farley, P. J., Slifkin and Geiler, JJ., concur.