Case ID: f-appx_341/html/0890-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Miguel JIMINEZ, a/k/a Miguel Jiminez Gomez, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Douglas M. VAUGHAN, Warden, Nottoway Correctional Center, Commonwealth of Virginia, Respondent—Appellee.
    No. 08-7099.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: July 15, 2009.
    Decided: Aug. 25, 2009.
    John E. Davidson, Davidson & Kitz-mann, PLC, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Robert F. McDonnell, Attorney General of Virginia, Benjamin H. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Miguel Jiminez seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Jiminez v. Vaughan, No. 3:07-cv-00639-MHL, 2008 WL 2329767 (E.D. Va. June 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).