Case ID: nys_67/html/1136-09.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

KANE, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    November Term, 1900.)
    Action by Frank Kane against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event, upon the ground that, interpreting the evidence most favorably to the plaintiff, it was not sufficient to establish actionable negligence upon the part' of the defendant, and' upon the further ground that the plaintiff assumed the risk of the accident which resulted in his injuries, and therefore the plaintiff, as matter of law, is not entitled to recover.