Case ID: nys_138/html/1107-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM McLENNAN, P. J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

BERRY et al., Respondents, v. ARLAND et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    November 27, 1912.)
    Action by Hugh M. Berry and another against William W. Arland and another.
   PER CURIAM

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

McLENNAN, P. J.,

dissents, upon the ground that the plaintiffs have an adequate remedy at law, and that there are no findings of fact which do, and no evidence to warrant findings which would, support the judgment.