Case ID: f-appx_384/html/0255-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael Ladale REEVES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NUVOX COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 09-2370.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: June 17, 2010.
    Decided: June 23, 2010.
    Michael Ladale Reeves, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edgar McDonald, III, John Timothy Merrell, Madison Baker Wyche, III, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Ladale Reeves appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Defendant’s summary judgment motion on his discrimination and retaliation claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C.A. § 12101 to § 12213 (West 2005 & Supp. 2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Reeves v. Nuvox Commc’ns, Inc., No. 6:08-cv-04031-HMH, 2009 WL 4016617 (D.S.C. Nov. 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.