Case ID: ohio-st-3d_50/html/0131-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dayton Bar Association v. Ellison.
    [Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Ellison (1990), 50 Ohio St. 3d 131.]
    (No. 89-2167
    Submitted February 13, 1990
    Decided April 11, 1990.)
    
      
      Charles Geidner, for relator.
    
      Kathy L. Ellison, pro se.
    
   Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 6-101(A)(3) and 7-101(A)(3). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.