Case ID: so2d_832/html/0943-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Troy MARTIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D02-2471.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 26, 2002.
    Troy Martin, in proper person.
    Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, and Erin K. Zack, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before COPE, GERSTEN and SHEWN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Troy Martin appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, wherein defendant-appellant Martin asserts newly discovered evidence. The motion fails to set forth what the evidence was in the defendant’s case, and how the claimed newly discovered evidence would have affected the outcome, if at all. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). This court’s affirmance is without prejudice to the defendant to file an amended motion.

Affirmed.