Case ID: nj_37/html/0462-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

PIETRO ROSELLE, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE CITY OF EAST ORANGE, COUNTY OF ESSEX, NEW JERSEY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Argued June 4, 1962
    Decided June 11, 1962.
    
      Mr. Samuel A. Lamer argued the cause for the appellants {Messrs. Budd, Lamer & Kent, attorneys).
    
      Mr. William P. Reiss argued the cause for the respondent {Mr. William L. Brack, attorney).
   Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons-given by the trial court in an opinion reported under the name of Greggio v. Orange, 69 N. J. Super. 453 (1961).

For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall and Haneman—6.

For reversal—Hone.