Case ID: ad2d_197/html/0530-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joe Carter, Appellant.
    [602 NYS2d 181]
   —Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Berkowitz, J.), rendered May 20, 1991, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress statements made by the defendant to a law enforcement official.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We agree with the hearing court that the defendant’s statements were made during an exchange with a police officer, while the officer was attempting merely to calm the obstreperous defendant, and not attempting to elicit an incriminating response (see, Rhode Is. v Innis, 446 US 291, 301). In any event, considering the strength of the evidence against the defendant, including the identification of the defendant as a perpetrator of the crime near the scene of, and shortly after, the crime, by a person who witnessed the incident, any error in admitting the statement would have been harmless beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 237).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Lawrence, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.