Case ID: pa-super_199/html/0395-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Wright, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Commonwealth v. Miller, Appellant.
    Argued September 11, 1962.
    Before Rhodes, P. J., Ervin, Wright, Woodside, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ.
    
      
      Malvin L. Skaroff, with him Skaroff and Skaroff, for appellant.
    
      Edward G. Biester, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, with him Paul R. Beckert, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
    November 15, 1962:
   Opinion by

Wright, J.,

This appeal is controlled by our opinion in the case of Commonwealth v. Dalton, 199 Pa. Superior Ct. 388, 185 A. 2d 653. The only difference is a matter of procedure. Each appellant was granted a supersedeas conditioned upon the entry of security. Dalton filed the required bond. Miller did not.

Judgment affirmed.