Case ID: sw3d_518/html/0285-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mitchell ARNALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    ED 104423
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: May 16, 2017
    Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market Street, Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
    Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, for respondent.
    Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mitchell Amall (“Movant”) appeals from the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).