Case ID: misc_30/html/0781-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jesse D. Crary, Respondent, v. Julian A. Dimock et al., Appellants.
    Appeal by the defendants from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, second district, borough of Manhattan.
    Bradbury C. Chetwood, for appellants.
    Sidney H. Stuart, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

No question of law is presented for our review, 'and as the conflict of fact was correctly disposed of below, it follows that the judgment must be affirmed.

Present: Freedman, P. J.; MacLean and Leventritt, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.