Case ID: pa_314/html/0017-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Baiz v. Atlantic Refining Company, Appellant.
    Argued January 2, 1934.
    Before Frazer, C. J., Simpson, Kephart, Schaffer, Maxey, Drew and Linn, JJ.
    
      
      Thomas Byron Miller, with him Wm. A. Valentine, Jr., for appellant.
    
      John H. Dando, Richard B. Sheridan and WilUam A. Corcoran, for appellee, were not heard.
    January 30, 1934:
   Per Curiam,

Defendant appeals from the refusal of its motion for judgment n. o. v. and new trial, after verdict for plaintiff, in an action of trespass arising from a collision between two trucks. All questions raised by appellant relate to matters of fact which were left to' the jury under proper instructions and resolved in plaintiff’s favor. As the record discloses ample testimony to support the' finding of the jury, we are concluded thereby: Remppis v. Ettelt, 310 Pa. 479; Rossheim v. Bornot, 310 Pa. 154; Adams v. Gardiner, 306 Pa. 576; Sheasley v. Haney, 311 Pa. 144.

The judgment is affirmed.