Case ID: f-appx_399/html/0788-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Percy Lee CLAY; Diane Clay, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Commissioner; Un-Named Revenue Officers, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 10-1456.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.
    Decided: Oct. 25, 2010.
    
      Percy Lee Clay and Diane Clay, Appellants Pro Se. Teresa E. McLaughlin, Laurie Allyn Snyder, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
    Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Percy Lee Clay and Diane Clay appeal the district court’s orders dismissing, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, their action challenging their federal income tax liability, as well as their motions for reconsideration and recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clay v. Internal Rev. Serv., No. 1:08-cv-00681-WO-PTS, 2009 WL 3391577 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 19, 2009); 2010 WL 4489368 (Mar. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.