Case ID: nj-super_142/html/0287-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES SAUNDERS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
    Argued June 14, 1976
    Decided June 21, 1976.
    Before Judges Kole, Ard and Collester.
    
      
      Mr. Alan Silber argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney; Mr. Robert A. Baime, of counsel).
    
      Mr. Roy B. Greenman, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Prosecutor of Essex County, attorney).
   Per Curiam.

The conviction of defendant is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Bedford. Cf. Doe v. Commonwealth’s Attorney for City of Richmond, D. C., 403 F. Supp. 1199, aff’d - U. S. -, 96 S. Ct. 1489, 47 L. Ed. 2d 751 (1976).

Affirmed.