Case ID: cust-ct_2/html/0515-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Sullivan, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 40283.
    Protests 755136-G, etc., of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc. (New York).
   Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

It was stipulated that certain items consist of novelties in chief value of rubber. They were held dutiable at 25 percent, under paragraph 1537 (b) on the authority of Abstract 25607. Uninflated rubber balls or so-called beach balls the same as those the subject of Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48231) and United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770) were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1502.