Case ID: cust-ct_37/html/0275-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Lawrence, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 60074.
    protests 220622-K/5063 and 229042-K/5266 (Chicago).
    Brasco Manufacturing Co. v. United States,
   Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the) merchandise consists of hot-rolled steel strips similar to those involved in Abstract 58580, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to entries 14724 and 14912 covered by protest 220622-K. Since protest 229042-H was filed more than 61 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514 (16 U. S. C. § 1514).