Case ID: us_207/html/0580-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 358.
    The Blythe Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Bankers’ Investment Company et al.
    In error to the Supreme Court of the State of California.
    Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted October 21, 1907.
    Decided October 28, 1907.
    
      Mr. George W. Towle for plaintiff in error. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney, Mr. E. S. Heller and Mr. Thomas 7. Bergin for defendants in error.
   Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Blythe v. Hinckley, 84 Fed. Rep. 228; Blythe Company v. Blythe, 172 U. S. 644; Blythe Company v. Hinckley, 111 Fed. Rep. 827; Blythe Company v. Hinckley, 184 U. S. 701; Blythe v. Hinckley, 180 U. S. 333; Dupaneur v. Rochereau, 21 Wall. 130; Metcalf v. Watertown, 153 U. S. 671; Blythe Company v. Bankers’ Investment Company, 147 California, 82; Missouri Pacific Railway v. Fitzgerald, 160 U. S. 558, 582; Temple v. Hagar, 4 Wall. 432, 434.