Case ID: f-appx_306/html/0823-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Mark Anthony HOUGH, Defendant—Appellant.
    No. 08-7522.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Jan. 18, 2009.
    Decided: Jan. 15, 2009.
    Mark Anthony Hough, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

Mark Anthony Hough appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hough, No. 4:02-cr-00471-TLW-3 (D.S.C. filed July 21, 2008; entered July 22, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.