Case ID: nj-misc_10/html/0074-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Cueiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ANDREW LEWIS, PLAINTIFF, v. JAMES FELZ AND CHARLES LOESSIG, DEFENDANTS.
    Submitted October 16, 1931
    Decided December 22, 1931.
    Before ■ Justices Campbell, Lloyd and Bodine.
    Bor the plaintiff, Harry Spitzer.
    
    Bor the defendant, John G. Stoclcel.
    
   Pee Cueiam.

Our examination of the evidence leads us to the conclusion that the verdict was supported by the clear weight of evidence. The damages, however, seem excessive, and unless the plaintiff consents to a reduction of his judgment to the sum of $2,400, a rule absolute for a new trial will be entered. Otherwise the rule will be discharged.