Case ID: ga-app_36/html/0650-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Luke, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

17902.
    Beckworth v. The State.
    Criminal Law, 16 C. J. p. 1180, n. 74; p, 1217, n, 44, 45; p. 1221, n. 25.
   Luke, J.

The first special ground of the motion for a new trial being' but an amplification of the general grounds, and the second ground not having been approved by the trial judge, this case is here upon the single assignment of error that the evidence did not authorize the verdiet. There was ample evidence to authorize the verdict, and the trial judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Decided April 12, 1927.

Possessing liquor; from McIntosh superior- court — Judge Sheppard. December 30, 1926.

H. O. Farr, W. G. Little, for plaintiff in error.

J. Saxton Daniel, solicitor-general, J. T. Grice, solicitor-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.