Case ID: nj_53/html/0007-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Ctjriam:.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SALVATORE PIRO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    Argued November 6, 1968
    Decided November 25, 1968.
    
      Mr. Geoffrey Gaulkin argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Beggans and Eeale, attorneys).
    
      Mr. Arthur N. D’ltalia argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Warren, Chasan, Leyner & Holland, attorneys).
   Pee Ctjriam:.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Appellate Division, 103 N. J. Super. 456.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Erancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and HaneMAN - 7.

For reversal — Hone.