Case ID: ohio-st-2d_13/html/0149-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Beerman, Appellee, v. City of Kettering et al., Appellants.
    (No. 41032
    Decided March 20, 1968.)
    
      
      Messrs. Goldman, Cole & Putmck and Mr. Jerome Goldman, for appellee.
    
      Mr. John L. Adams, law director, Messrs. Vorys, Safer, Seymour & Pease and Mr. Arthur 1. Vorys, for appellants.
   Per Curiam.

This court finds itself in the same predicament as did the Court of Appeals. There is no bill of exceptions and no findings of fact and conclusions of law by the trial court.

In entertaining the appeal we were not fully aware of the situation as it has developed. For the reason stated, we cannot reach the merits of the controversy, and we' are constrained to affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmebmah, Matthias, Hebbebt, SchNeid-eb and BbowN, JJ., concur.

Tboop, J., dissents.

Tboob, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting, for O’Nehx, J.