Case ID: misc2d_21/html/0287-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Sipal Realty Corporation, Respondent, v. Maurice William, Appellant.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    November 25, 1959.
    
      William L. Messing for appellant.
    
      Zalkin é Cohen (Frederick B. Sussmann of counsel), for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

The court below based its decision on a finding that rent was due in accordance with a judgment rendered in Special Term, Supreme Court. Thereafter, the Appellate Division reversed the Special Term. (Matter of Sipal Realty Corp. [Dankers], 16 Misc 2d 827, revd. 8 A D 2d 355.) While the preferable practice would have been to move in the Municipal Court for a new trial (Parkhurst v. Berdell, 110 N. Y. 386) we see no reason why the procedure should not be expedited. We, therefore, reverse the final order and direct a final order in favor of the tenant, without costs.

Concur — Steuer, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.