Case ID: f-appx_179/html/0060-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Anthony THOMAS, Appellant.
    No. 04-3068.
    United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
    April 21, 2006.
    George Peter Eliopoulos, Kenneth L. Wainstein, U.S. Attorney Roy Wallace McLeese, III, Assistant U.S. Attorney, John Paul Gidez, U.S. Attorney’s Office, John Robert Fisher, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
    A.J. Kramer, Michelle M. Peterson, Federal Public Defenders, Washington, DC, for Appellant.
    Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and SENTELLE and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
      Circuit Judge Rogers would grant the petition for rehearing.
    
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and was argued by counsel. On consideration thereof; and of appellant’s petition for rehearing and the response thereto, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of conviction be affirmed in accordance with the opinion issued November 18, 2005, the sentence be vacated, and the case be remanded for resentencing in accordance with United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Because the parties agree that the record establishes a “reasonable likelihood that the sentence would have been lower” had the district court not applied the Sentencing Guidelines as though they were mandatory, United States v. Gomez, 431 F.3d 818, 824 (2005), a remand for resentencing is warranted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be denied in all other respects.

The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.