Case ID: nj-eq_53/html/0238-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Edwin C. Swift et al., appellants, v. James N. Pidcock, respondent.
    On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Van Fleet, whose opinion is reported in Swift v. Pidcock, 6 Dick. Ch. Rep. 405.
    
    
      Mr. Frederic W. Stevens and Mr. Richard V. Lindabury, for 2the appellants.
    
      Mr. Louis Hood and Mr. J. Flavel McGee, for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Gummere, .Lippincott, Magie, Reed, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown — 9.

For reversal — ISTone. .