Case ID: a3d_189/html/0376-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re: Risperdal Litigation Jonathan SAKSEK, Petitioner v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Johnson & Johnson Company, Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Respondents
    In re: Risperdal Litigation Joshua Winter, Petitioner v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Company, Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Respondents
    No. 75 EAL 2018 No. 76 EAL 2018
    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
    July 5, 2018
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of July, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

[S]hould summary judgment have been granted in Janssen's favor on statute of limitations grounds?