Case ID: ad_235/html/0449-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Clark Plastering Company, Appellant, v. Seaboard Surety Company, Respondent.
    
    First Department,
    May 20, 1932.
    
      
      Gustave B. Garfield of counsel [Garfield & Seligson, attorneys], for the appellant.
    
      Thomas Kiernan of counsel [Orison S. Mar den with him on the brief; White & Case, attorneys], for the respondent.
    
      
       Appeal dismissed, 259 N. Y. 424.
    
   Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in the opinion of the court, herewith handed down (235 App. Div. 444), in the companion appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency, it is determined that that order should be reversed and the motion granted. It becomes unnecessary, therefore, to decide whether or not a defense interposed to such complaint is sufficient in law.

The appeal should be dismissed, without costs.

Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Sherman, JJ.

Appeal dismissed, without costs.