Case ID: nys_78/html/1135-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RILEY, Respondent, v. VILLAGE OF BALLSTON SPA, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.
    September 3, 1902.)
    Action by Benjamin C. Riley against the village of Ballston Spa.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment reversed, on the ground that the damages are excessive, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event, unless the plaintiff stipulates to reduce the damages to $75 per year, in which case the judgment, as so modified, is affirmed, without costs in this court.