Case ID: f-appx_223/html/0950-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas William SCHWARTZ, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 06-10501
    Non-Argument Calendar.
    United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
    May 10, 2007.
    J. Stanford Lifsey, P.A., Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
    David Paul Rhodes, United States Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for PlaintiffAppellee.
    Before TJOFLAT, BIRCH and HILL, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

J. Stanford Lifsey, counsel for Thomas William Schwartz, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Schwartz’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.