Case ID: so2d_718/html/0368-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael MENGORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 98-2934.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Oct. 1, 1998.
    Michael Mengore, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.
    No appearance required for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Appellant Michael David Mengore appeals a trial court order denying his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. His motion was properly verified, but the factual allegations in his memorandum of law contained a defective verification clause in which he said that the statements were “true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.” See Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla.1985); Hahn v. Frederick, 66 So.2d 823 (Fla.1953).

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s denial of post-conviction relief. This disposition is without prejudice to appellant’s right to timely resubmit the motion and memorandum with a proper oath.

GUNTHER, POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.