Case ID: ny-super-ct_45/html/0588-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JOHN J. CORBETT, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LOUIS DE COMEAU, Defendant and Appellant.
    
    The order appealed from denies defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff’s attorney to ■ furnish “a sworn statement showing residence, occupation, and present address of plaintiff, &c.,” that the defendant might be enabled to examine the plaintiff before trial. It appcared from the moving papers that the complaint was not served, plaintiff’s proceedings being stayed. Held, that no substantial right was necessarily involved - in the denial of the motion and the case failed to disclose any exigency which demanded the order. At most the matter rested in the discretion of the judge below.
    Before Sedgwick and Van Vorst, JJ.
    
      Decided March 14, 1879.
    Appeal by defendant from order, &c.
    
      Coudert Brothers, for appellant.
    
      Frank W. Severance, for respondent.
    
      
       See post, p. 637.
    
   Per Curiam

opinion for dismissal of the appeal with ten dollars costs.