Case ID: sw3d_418/html/0480-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Eric B. HICKERSON, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 99498.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    Oct. 22, 2013.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 5, 2013.
    Application for Transfer Denied Feb. 4, 2014.
    Dora A. Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Eric B. Hickerson, Boonville, MO, pro se.
    Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eric B. Hickerson appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his Motion for Post-Conviction DNA Testing without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. State v. Ruff, 256 S.W.3d 55, 56 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).