Case ID: f-appx_101/html/0246-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Abubacar CEESAY, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 02-10002.
    D.C. No. CR-99-20251-JW.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted June 14, 2004.
    
    Decided June 18, 2004.
    
      Gary G. Fry, Asst. U.S. Atty., USSJOffice of the U.S. Attorney, San Jose, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Peter A. Furst, Furst & Pendergast, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before HALL, LEAVY and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Abubacar Ceesay appeals his guilty plea conviction and 14-month sentence for possession of counterfeit alien registration cards, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Ceesay has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Ceesay has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.