Case ID: f-appx_449/html/0037-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CHET’S SHOES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sidney KASTNER, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 2010-1555.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    Aug. 5, 2011.
    Rehearing Denied Sept. 21, 2011.
    Donald W. Niles, Niles Law Office, P.A., of Wadena, MN, argued for plaintiff-appel-lee.
    Walter D. Ames, Law Office of Walter D. Ames, of McLean, VA, argued for defendant-appellant.
    LOURIE, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.