Case ID: ny-2d_61/html/0918-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Eugene Litman, Appellant, v Phyllis Litman, Respondent.
    Argued February 17, 1984;
    decided March 20, 1984
    
      APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
    
      Kathy Solerwitz and Barbara Simon for appellant.
    
      Kenneth J. Weinstein and Richard C. Goldberg for respondent.
   OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative for the reasons stated in the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division (93 AD2d 695). We cannot say that the expert opinion with respect to the economic value of the plaintiff’s law practice would not be of assistance in fashioning a distributive award under the statute.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.