Case ID: so2d_537/html/0691-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cleveland LYNN, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 88-302.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Jan. 27, 1989.
    Michael E. Allen, Public Defender; P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., A.E. Pooser, IV, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The Public Defender filed an Anders brief and the appellant filed a short pro se brief.

At sentencing of the defendant in the instant case (trial court case #87-4695), the court announced that the sentences imposed were to run concurrent with the sentence imposed in a previous case (trial court case # 87-2255). However, the written sentence omits such provision for concurrency. On remand, the trial court shall amend to provide for such concurrency.

We affirm the judgments and sentences but remand for the purpose stated above.

SMITH, C.J., and ERVIN and NIMMONS, JJ., concur. 
      
      . Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).