Case ID: f2d_498/html/1092-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Roger C. MYERS, d/b/a Romyco Stereo, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMPEX, INC., et al., DefendantsAppellees.
    No. 73-3510
    Summary Calendar.
    
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Aug. 21, 1974.
    
      Roger C. Myers, pro se.
    Stanley McMurry, Dallas, Tex., for Cap. Records. '
    James W. Mehaffy, Beaumont, Tex., for Columbia.
    R. Daniel Settle, Fort Worth, Tex., for RCA.
    J. Hoke Peacock, II, Beaumont, Tex., for Harry Fox Agency, Inc.
    John F. Still, pro se.
    Joseph Bonner, Nowata, Okl., for other defendants-appellees.
    Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       Rule 18, 5th. Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.
    
   PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to our remand, the district court for the Eastern Disrict of Texas has examined Appellant’s complaint in his action before the district court for the Western District of Oklahoma. The district court for the Eastern District of Texas again concluded that Appellant’s claim was identical to that dismissed in the Western District of Oklahoma. We affirm, concluding that the doctrine of direct estoppel bars the claim. 
      
      . Myers v. Ampex, Inc., 491 F.2d 1103 (5th Cir. 1974).
     
      
      . See Estevez v. Nabers, 219 F.2d 321 (5th Cir. 1955); 9 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 2373, at 238-39.