Case ID: nj-eq_100/html/0346-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Ella Hicks, complainant, v. Leon Hicks et al., defendants.
    [Decided October 27th, 1926.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Griffin, whose opinion is reported in 99 N. J. Eq. 92.
    
    
      Mr. Emanuel Weils, Mr. James B. Bowen and Mr. John S. Applegate & Son, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. Leo J. Warwick, for the respondent.
   Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, "Van Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.