Case ID: ill-app_205/html/0351-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Mr. Justice Holdom", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph Mazur, trading as Joseph Mazur & Company, Appellee, v. Stanislaw Goderski and Pelagia Goderski, Appellants.
    Gen. No. 22,755.
    (Not to he reported in full.)
    Abstract of the Decision.
    Brokers, § 88
      
      —when evidence is sufficient to show employment as broker. Evidence held sufficient to sustain the finding that defendants employed plaintiff in the exchange of defendants’ real estate, in an action to recover a commission on such exchange.
    Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John J. Sullivan, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.
    Affirmed.
    Opinion filed April 16, 1917.
    Statement of the Case.
    Action "by Joseph Mazur, trading as Joseph Mazur & Company, plaintiff, against Stanislaw Goderski and Pelagia Goderski, defendants, to recover commissions as a real estate broker. From a judgment for plaintiff for three hundred dollars, defendants appeal.
    C. C. H. Zillman, for appellants.
    Beach & Beach, for appellee.
    
      
      See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.
    
   Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.