Case ID: mcgrath_1/html/0327-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

VAN VRANKEN ET AL. vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Wayne),
    No. 11912,
    85 M., 140.
   To vacate an order requiring relator to furnish a bill of particulars, in an action for breach of contract where the damages are unliquidated.

Denied, without costs, April 15, 1891.

Held, that ordinarily an order requiring a-bill of particulars will not be reviewed or disturbed, but in the present case the court went beyond what is properly required to be stated in a bill, and in such case the Supreme Court will correct the action of the trial court.