Case ID: so2d_739/html/0129-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Christopher Timothy MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 98-2378.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    July 14, 1999.
    Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Darien M. Doe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before NESBITT, COPE, and GREEN, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it revoked the appellant’s community control where the record evidence supports the court’s conclusion that the appellant willfully changed his approved residence without permission, failed to report to his community control officer and failed to file his required weekly log accounting for all of his activities. See McPherson v. State, 530 So.2d 1095, 1097-98 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); McNealy v. State, 479 So.2d 138, 139 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Brookshire v. State, 473 So.2d 14, 15 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); see generally Anderson v. State, 711 So.2d 106 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Molina v. State, 520 So.2d 320 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Affirmed.