Case ID: so2d_168/html/0163-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alfred HOWARD and Anna F. Howard, his wife, Appellants, v. Henry A. BLAINE and Gertrude E. Blaine, Appellees.
    No. 4415.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
    Oct. 2, 1964.
    Rehearing Denied Oct. 27, 1964.
    Westley W. Silvian, of Burdick & Silvi-an, and Richard T. Stierer, West Palm Beach, for appellants.
    Kirk Sullivan, of Sullivan & Robinson, West Palm Beach, for appellees.
   PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal a judgment for the defendants in an action arising out of an intersectional automobile collision. Mutually stressed as a vital issue was the relative speeds of the respective vehicles, and the case was submitted to the jury on conflicting testimony including testimony offered by a purported expert who was not an eye witness. On careful examination of the record and arguments we cannot conclude that the jury erred in resolving the issues against the plaintiffs and for the defendants.

Affirmed.

WHITE, Acting C. J., ANDREWS, J., and McCORD, GUYTE P., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.