Case ID: so3d_166/html/0240-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Joseph A. KUNSTLER and C. Dean Newton v. LTSKC, INC., Thomas A. Parsons, and Ivan T. Cabrera.
    No. 2015-CC-0914.
    Supreme Court of Louisiana.
    June 5, 2015.
   PER CURIAM.

| granted. Venue for this derivative action is not proper in East Baton Rouge Parish. See' La.Code Civ. P. art. 641; H.R. 10 Profit Sharing Plan v. Mayeux, 03-0691 (La.App. 1 Cir. 9/17/04), 893 So.2d 887 (on rehearing), writ denied, 05-0868 (La.5/13/05), 902 So.2d 1031. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and the district court is directed to dismiss the action or transfer it to a proper venue, as provided by La.Code Civ. P. art. 121.