Case ID: ohio-st-3d_118/html/0265-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Foster, Appellee.
    [Cite as State v. Foster, 118 Ohio St.3d 265, 2008-Ohio-2542.]
    (No. 2007-1585
    Submitted April 23, 2008
    Decided June 4, 2008.)
    Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Tanner B. McFall, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
   {¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Cabrales, 118 Ohio St.3d 54, 2008-Ohio-1625, 886 N.E.2d 181, but the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with State v. Cabrales, including a determination as to whether the trafficking and possession offenses were committed with a separate animus under R.C. 2941.25(B).

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Lanzinger, J., not participating.