Case ID: so2d_483/html/0894-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James A. AOSSEY, Appellant, v. Carl NOLTING, Shearson/American Express, Inc., a Delaware corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Safecard Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Peter A. Halmos, and Steven J. Halmos, Appellees.
    No. 84-1646.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    March 5, 1986.
    
      Francine Clair Landau of Inman and Landau, and Penland, Seelie, Morgan & Penland, Jacksonville, for appellant.
    Bennett Falk and Patricia E. Cowart of Ruden, Barnett, McClosky, Schuster & Russell, P.A., for appellees Shearson and Nolting.
   UPON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellees’ Motion for Rehearing, vacate our opinion filed February 6, 1985, 473 So.2d 690, and affirm the trial court’s order which granted the appellees’ Motion to Stay and to Compel Arbitration. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Byrd,U.S. 105 S.Ct. 1238, 84 L.Ed.2d 158 (1985); Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. v. Young, 475 So.2d 221 (Fla.1985); Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc., v. Me-lamed, 453 So.2d 858 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), app’d 476 So.2d 140 (Fla.1985).

It is so ORDERED.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and WALDEN, JJ., concur.