Case ID: sw2d_988/html/0602-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James P. MARTINEZ, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ST. LUKE’S HEALTH CORPORATION, Defendant/Respondent.
    No. 74772.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    March 30, 1999.
    G. William Wynne, Clayton, for appellant.
    John J. Moellering, Gary M. Smith, Lewis, Rice & Fingersh, L.C., St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before HOFF, P.J. and GARY M. GAERTNER, J. and RHODES RUSSELL, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James P. Martinez (Plaintiff) appeals from a judgment entered by the trial court sustaining the motion for summary judgment filed by St. Luke’s Health Corporation (Defendant) and denying Plaintiffs Motion to Substitute Name of Party and Suggestion of Mootness of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. We find no genuine issue of material fact or error of law. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).