Case ID: so2d_391/html/0218-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Victor Murdoch SHEMWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 80-976.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
    Oct. 29, 1980.
    
      Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, and Robert F. Moeller, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
    Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Eula Tuttle Mason, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, but the case is remanded for resen-tencing. The sentence incorrectly failed to provide the period of credit time to be allowed appellant as required by Section 921.-161(1), Florida Statutes (1979). Brooker v. State, 362 So.2d 697 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). Appellant need not be present at resentenc-ing.

BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., and OTT and RYDER, JJ., concur.