Case ID: f-appx_143/html/0825-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Alberto Leandro Maldonado PEREZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
    No. 04-72095.
    Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.
    
    Decided Sept. 15, 2005.
    Law Offices of Sarah J.M. Jones, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.
    Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, OIL, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Offiee of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
    Before REINHARDT, RYMER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Alberto Leandro Maldonado Perez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that Maldonado Perez failed to establish good moral character for purposes of cancellation of removal. See Moran v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1089, 1091 (9th Cir.2005) (a moral character determination is reviewable only where it falls under one of the per se exclusion categories contained in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)); cf. Gomez-Lopez v. Ashcroft, 393 F.3d 882, 884 (9th Cir.2005).

We also lack jurisdiction to review the denial of voluntary departure. See Gomez-Lopez, 393 F.3d at 884.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.