Case ID: misc_11/html/0711-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Benjamin A. Norton et al., Respondents, v. James W. Matthews et al., Appellants.
    Appeal by the defendants, James W. Matthews and John Rofkar, and by John Rofkar, Jr., as their assignee, from a judgment entered upon the decision of a judge at Special Term setting aside assignment as fraudulent and for other relief.
    
      It. P. Lee and G. A. Seixas, for appellants.
    
      Frederic R. Fellogg, for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

The appellants having failed to print the evidence given upon the trial by the parties, the findings of fact made by the learned trial judge must be deemed to have been made upon sufficient evidence. The only question raised by the appeal, therefore, is whether the conclusions of law are warranted by the facts as found. Upon a careful consideration of this question we think they are.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion filed below.

Present: Freedman and Gildersleeve, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.