Case ID: f2d_496/html/1197-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. MISSION RUBBER COMPANY, INC., Respondent.
    No. 73-1703.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    June 19, 1974.
    
      A. Bashir (argued), Wilford W. Johansen, Director, Region 21, N.L.R.B., Los Angeles, Cal., Elliott Moore, Acting Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
    A. Patrick Nagel (argued), Stephen C. Drummy, of Nagel, Regan & Davidson, Newport Beach, Cal., for respondent.
    Before DUNIWAY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and SKOPIL, District Judge.
    
      
       The Honorable Otto R. Skopil, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation.
    
   OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The petitioning Board’s decision and order are published at 202 N.L.R.B. No. 17, 82 L.R.R.M. 1801 (1973). The Board’s findings that Mission Rubber violated sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(1) and 158(a)(3), are supported by substantial evidence. See NLRB v. Miller Redwood Co., 407 F.2d 1366 (9th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, the Board’s order will be enforced.