Case ID: f-appx_401/html/0231-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vickie Diane BECKER, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 09-30386.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.
    
    Filed Oct. 27, 2010.
    Ryan Archer, Assistant U.S., Office of The U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Leo Sanford Selvey, II, Selvey Law Firm, Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Vickie Diane Becker appeals from her 72-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea convictions for bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344, and money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1957. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Becker contends that her sentence is substantively unreasonable because it was greater than necessary to accomplish the purposes of sentencing when considered in light of the significant mitigating factors she presented. The district court did not procedurally err, and the sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and the totality of the circumstances. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); see also United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.