Case ID: f-appx_204/html/0223-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Rickey R. LLOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW HANOVER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT; Lieutenant Murphy; Sidney A. Causey; Chief Parker, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 06-6994.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Oct. 31, 2006.
    Decided: Nov. 6, 2006.
    Rickey R. Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.
    
      Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
   PER CURIAM:

Rickey R. Lloyd appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lloyd v. New Hanover County Sheriff Dep’t, No. 5:06-ct-03033-H (E.D.N.C. May 16, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.