Case ID: ga_173/html/0159-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam. Hines, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Smith v. Bennett.
   Per Curiam.

Under the pleadings and the evidence, the judge, to whom the ease was submitted for decision without the intervention of a jury, did not err in finding for the plaintiff and rendering the judgment to which exception is taken.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Eines, J., who dissents, and Gilbert, J., absent.

Hines, J.

dissenting. See Wagner v. Robinson, 56 Ga. 47; Jones v. Harrell, 110 Ga. 373 (35 S. E. 690), Blount v. Dugger, 115 Ga. 109 (41 S. E. 270); Cornelia Planing Mill Co. v. Wilcox, 129 Ga. 522 (59 S. E. 223) ; Mays v. Shields, 117 Ga. 814 (45 S. E. 68) ; Mickleberry v. O’Neal, 98 Ga. 42, 51 (25 S. E. 933) ; Napier v. Strong, 19 Ga. App. 401, 409 (91 S. E. 579).

No. 7943.

July 25, 1931.

C. W. Foy, for plaintiff in error. Homer Beeland, contra.