Case ID: sw2d_990/html/0023-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

David BRIGHAM, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CITY OF TOWN & COUNTRY, et al., Defendants/Respondents.
    No. 74004.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Feb. 9, 1999.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 6, 1999.
    Application to Transfer Denied June 1, 1999.
    Merle L. Silverstein, Sanford J. Boxer-man, Clayton, for appellants.
    Kenneth J. Heinz, Steven W. Garrett, St. Louis, for respondents.
    Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and RHODES RUSSELL, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Landowners appeal from the trial court’s granting of summary judgment to defendant City of Town & Country on their petition challenging City’s ordinance closing a private road, and seeking injunc-tive relief, declaratory relief, and damages. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value.

However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).