Case ID: so2d_521/html/0308-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Henry RICCIO and Jean Riccio, Appellants, v. GOLD COAST CAPITAL CORP., Appellee.
    No. 87-642.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    March 8, 1988.
    Ress, Gomez, Rosenberg, Howland & Mintz and Sheldon Rosenberg, for appellants.
    Broad & Cassel and Steven W. Davis, for appellee.
    Before HUBBART, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

The record supports the trial court’s determination that the parties intended the Gold Coast Capital Corporation mortgage be superior to the Riccio purchase money second mortgage. We therefore affirm the Final Judgment. See Liza Danielle, Inc. v. Jamko, Inc., 408 So.2d 735 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); see also Tippett v. Frank, 238 So.2d 671 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).

Affirmed.