Case ID: so2d_818/html/0500-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anthony B. BOYKINS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. SC01-1123.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    May 16, 2002.
    James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Linda L. Gaustad, Assistant Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, FL, for Petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Kellie A. Nielan and Pamela J. Roller, Assistant Attorneys General, Day-tona Beach, FL, for Respondent.
   PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision in Boykins v. State, 783 So.2d 317 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), based on alleged express and direct conflict with a decision of another district court of appeal. Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.