Case ID: nj_43/html/0512-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee CuhiAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

THELMA DOUGHTY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. TUNG-SOL ELECTRIC, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
    Argued November 17, 1964
    Decided December 14, 1964.
    
      Mrs. Sonia Napolitano argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Pindar, McElroy, Connell & Foley, attorneys).
    
      Mr. Louis C. Jacobson argued the cause for the respondent.
   Pee CuhiAM.

We granted certification to review the judgment of the Appellate Division reversing the judgment of the County Court and adjudging that Workmen’s Compensation benefits be paid to the employee.

The issue is wholly factual and ultimately turned upon conflicting medical testimony. After considering all of the circumstances we are not persuaded that we should disturb the judgment of the Appellate Division and it accordingly is affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WeiNTRAub, and Justices Jaoobs, FkaNcis, Proctok and SohettiNo — 5.

For reversal — Justices Haul and HaNEMAN — 2.