Case ID: f-appx_5/html/0328-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Glenn SURBER, Petitioner, v. CANNELTON INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents.
    No. 00-2191.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 28, 2001.
    Decided March 19, 2001.
    S.F. Raymond Smith, Rundle & Rundle, L.C., Pineville, WV, for petitioner. Mary Rich Maloy, Jackson & Kelly, P.L.L.C., Charleston, WY, for respondents.
    Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Glen Surber seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Surber v. Cannelton Industries, Inc., BRB No. 99-1153-BLA, (B.R.B. Aug. 9, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.