Case ID: f-appx_260/html/0541-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re Salvatore SPINNATO, Petitioner.
    No. 07-7377.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: Dec. 20, 2007.
    Decided: Dec. 28, 2007.
    Salvatore Spinnato, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Salvatore Spinnato petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to reopen his habeas petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The district court has recently ruled on the motion to reopen. Spinnato v. Galley, No. 1:02-cv-04213-JFM (D.Md. Nov. 15, 2007). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED. 
      
       To the extent Spinnato seeks to challenge the district court's order, a mandamus petition may not serve as a substitute for an appeal. See In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979).