Case ID: so2d_622/html/0193-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Anthony R. BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 92-2082.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
    Aug. 18, 1993.
    Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Susan D. Cline, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dawn S. Wynn, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of conviction and sentence for violating a domestic violence injunction. At a hearing, the trial court pronounced appellant guilty of indirect criminal contempt. However, the final judgment does not contain a recital of the facts constituting the contempt, contrary to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840(a)(6), nor were sufficient oral findings made at the hearing to satisfy the rule. Gidden v. State, 613 So.2d 457 (Fla.1993). Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are reversed and the cause remanded for entry of a corrected judgment and sentence.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.