Case ID: ohio-st-3d_92/html/0070-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Alice Robie Resnick, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State ex rel. Tenoever, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.
    [Cite as State ex rel. Tenoever v. Indus. Comm. (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 70.]
    (No. 00-1906
    Submitted April 24, 2001
    Decided June 13, 2001.)
   The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Butkovich■, Schimpf, Schimpf & Ginocchio Co., L.P.A., and James A. Whittaker, for appellant.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Dennis L. Hufstader, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Moyer. C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Resnick, J., dissents.

Alice Robie Resnick, J.,

dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.