Case ID: or_302/html/0148-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      MEMORANDUM OPINION", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Submitted on petition for reconsideration of order dated July 29, denying petition for review, reconsideration allowed; petition for review allowed and case remanded to Court of Appeals for further consideration October 28, petition for reconsideration filed November 12,
    allowed December 23, 1986
    See 302 Or 459, 727 P2d 125 (1986)
    In the Matter of the Compensation of Johnnie Stepp, Claimant. STEPP, Petitioner on Reconsideration, v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND CORPORATION et al, Respondents on Reconsideration.
    
    (WCB 83-01242; CA A34646; SC S32946)
    727 P2d 125
    James L. Edmunson, Malagon & Moore, Eugene, for petitioner on reconsideration. David C. Force, Eugene, for petitioner on review.
    Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, and John A. Reuling, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Salem, for respondents on review.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    
      
       Judicial review of order of Workers’ Compensation Board. 78 Or App 438, 717 P2d 216 (1986).
    
   MEMORANDUM OPINION

We allow the petition for reconsideration and the petition for review.

Having concluded that this case presents, as one of the primary issues, the same question presented in Smith v. SAIF, 302 Or 109, 727 P2d 123 (1986), we hereby remand this case to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of our decision in Smith v. SAIF, supra.