Case ID: sw_195/html/0599-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "DAVIDSON, P. J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

RAMIREZ v. STATE.
    (No. 4485.)
    (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
    May 23, 1917.)
    Criminal Law <®=s>1000(8) — Statement of Facts and Bill of Exceptions — Necessity.
    Where there was no statement of facts or bill of exceptions in the record, and questions and answers claimed to be erroneous were simply stated in the motion for new trial and not verified in any way by the court, they could not be reviewed.
    [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2816, 3204.] .
    Appeal from Bexar County Court ; Nelson Lytle, Judge.
    Ramundo Ramirez was convicted of unlawfully carrying a pistol, and he appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      E. B. Hendricks, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
   DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was given 12 months in the county jail for unlawfully carrying a pistol.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. The motion for new trial contains some questions and answers which, appellant alleges, show error, but they are not verified in any way by the court, and are simply stated in the motion for new trial.' In the attitude presented by the record, this matter cannot be considered.

As the record is presented there is nothing to review, and the judgment will be affirmed. 
      
       — -Pnr other eases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes