Case ID: f-appx_203/html/0031-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronnie Lynn SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 05-30582.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Argued and Submitted Aug. 16, 2006.
    
    Filed Sept. 29, 2006.
    USGF-Office of The U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Evangelo Arvanetes, Esq., FDMT-Fed-eral Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before: PREGERSON, NOONAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

The district court did not solicit the views of counsel before deciding whether to re-sentence Appellant Ronnie Lynn Smith under United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1085 (9th Cir.2005). This mistake requires us to re-remand the case for compliance with Ameline. See United States v. Montgomery, 462 F.3d 1067, 1072 (9th Cir.2006).

REMANDED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.