Case ID: njl_115/html/0504-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

MARY SILAK, RESPONDENT, v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
    Submitted May 31, 1935
    Decided October 9, 1935.
    
      For the respondent, Lichtenstein, Schwartz & Friedenberg,
    
    For the appellant, Collins & Corbin.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Yan Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolesKell, Bafferty, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.