Case ID: sw3d_39/html/0073-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Charles E. HALEY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Kimberly D. EDGAR, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 77215.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Seven.
    March 6, 2001.
    
      Ann P. Hagan, J. Kevin Hamlett & Joseph E. Maxwell, Mexico, MO, for appellant.
    J. Patrick Chassaing, Paul E. Martin, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
    Before MARY K. HOFF, C.J., CRANDALL, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this action arising’from an automobile accident, defendant, Kimberly D. Edgar, appeals from the trial court’s grant of the motion for new trial by plaintiff, Charles E. Haley. The trial court granted plaintiff’s motion because it found that the jury’s verdict was against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears and an opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).