Case ID: f-appx_675/html/0753-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcos De JESUS-ZEFERINO, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 16-50253
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted January 18, 2017 
    
    Filed January 24, 2017
    Christopher Alexander, Helen H. Hong, Colin M. McDonald, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Michael Marks, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Before; TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Marcos De Jesus-Zeferino appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the nine-month consecutive sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

De Jesus-Zeferino claims that the district court procedurally erred by failing to address his arguments for a low-end sentence. We disagree. The record reflects that the court considered De Jesus-Zeferi-no’s arguments and sufficiently explained its reasons for concluding that a mid-range sentence was warranted. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

De Jesus-Zeferino’s unopposed motion to take judicial notice of the presentence report is granted.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.