Case ID: nev_92/html/0629-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

WILLIAM DAVIS, Appellant, v. RAMIRO M. GOMEZ, Respondent.
    No. 8513
    November 10, 1976
    555 P.2d 1228
    
      Stanley W. Pierce, Las Vegas, for Appellant.
    
      Earle W. White, Jr., Las Vegas, for Respondent.
   OPINION

Per Curiam:

Appellant contends the trial court erred in finding consideration for modification of a written contract. We disagree.

After reviewing the record, we find substantial evidence supporting that finding and, thus, the judgment is affirmed. J & J Building Contractors, Inc. v. Savage Construction, Inc., 92 Nev. 590, 555 P.2d 488 (1976); Holland Livestock v. B & C Enterprises, 92 Nev. 473, 553 P.2d 950 (1976).

Other issues raised by appellant are without merit and we need not consider them.

Affirmed.