Case ID: dc_2/html/0078-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

William Sanford v. Washington Boyd.
    A sail-maker at the'Washington n^vy-yard, appointed by a warrant under the hand of the Secretary of the Navy and seal of the department, is an officer of the United States and exempt from militia duty.
    Replevin, for goods taken by distress for militia fines.
    Mr. Jones, for the plaintiff.
    Sanford was appointed sail-maker for the navy-yard at Washington, by a warrant under the hand of the Secretary of the Navy and the seal of the department, and is therefore an officer of the government of the United States, and exempted from militia duties, by the second section of the Act of Congress of the 8th of May, 1792, [1 Stat. at Large, 271,] Wise v. Withers, 3 Cranch, 331.
    
      Mr. Caldwell, contra.
    
    The case of Wise v. Withers does hot decide this. Wise was a judicial officer and expressly excepted. The act of the 27th of March, 1804, [2 Stat. at Large, 297,] authorizes the President to attach, to the navy-yard, a sail-maker; but this does not authorize the Secretary to make the appointment by a warrant under his hand and the seal of the department only. He is, therefore, not an officer, either judicial or executive, of the government of the United States.
   Judgment for the plaintiff.