Case ID: ny_280/html/0687-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Schafran & Finkel, Inc., Appellant, v. M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc., Respondent.
    Submitted April 3, 1939;
    decided April 11, 1939.
   Motion for reargument denied with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. There is no stay preventing defendant from < proceeding according to the provisions of the Arbitration Law. Neither is there any intimation in the opinion that there was, or was not, a contract. We were dealing simply with the pleadings as they were. (See 280 N. Y. 164.)