Case ID: ad2d_215/html/0338-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Baralan International, S.p.A., Respondent, v Vetrerie Bormioli Ing. Luigi S.p.A et al., Defendants, and Avant Industries, Limited, Appellant.
    [627 NYS2d 44]
   Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Irma Vidal Santaella, J.), entered March 10, 1994, which granted plaintiffs motion pursuant to CPLR 3217 (b) to voluntarily discontinue the action against defendant Avant Industries, Limited, with prejudice, but without costs, disbursements or attorneys’ fees against any party, unanimously reversed, on the law, to the extent appealed from, to condition said discontinuance upon the payment by plaintiff of Avant’s costs, disbursements and reasonable attorneys’ fees from the inception of this action to date and to remand the matter for determination of a suitable amount, with costs.

In this now sixteen-year-old action for goods sold and delivered, where the record amply supports Avant’s contention that plaintiff, an Italian manufacturer, has been largely responsible for the delays which have not only prejudiced Avant by its having to defend this action at considerable expense over so many years but, as noted by Trial Term, have abused the resources of the New York courts, including two prior appeals to this Court, it was an abuse of the court’s discretion in failing to condition the discontinuance upon payment of Avant’s costs, disbursements and reasonable attorneys’ fees. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.