Case ID: ohio-st-3d_84/html/0491-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      \n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Office of Disciplinary Counsel et al. v. Nentwick.
    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Nentwick (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 491.]
    (No. 98-1323
    Submitted October 28, 1998
    Decided February 10, 1999.)
    
      
      Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, and Lori J. Brown, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator Office of Disciplinary Counsel.
    
      Mark A. Hutson and Frederic E. Naragon, for relator Columbiana County Bar •Association.
    
      R. Eric Kibler, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings of the board and its conclusions, except the conclusion that in the MacKall matter respondent violated DR 7-102(A)(2) (knowingly advancing a claim or defense unwarranted under existing law), which the board erroneously characterized as “failing to carry out a contract of employment.” We also adopt the recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.