Case ID: md_98/html/0664-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Schmucker, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE, Use of DANIEL B. FLUSKEY vs. CHARLES SHIPLEY.
    The preceding case of Gemundt v. Shipley, followed.
    Appeal from Baltimore City Court (Dennis, J.)
    The cause was argued before McSherry, C. J., Fowler, Briscoe, Page, Boyd, Pearce, Schmucker and Jones, JJ.
    
      
      John C. Tolson (with whom was Olin Bryan on the brief), for the appellant.
    
      Thomas G. Hayes and R. Lee Slingluff, for the appellee.
    (Decided February 19th, 1904.)
   Schmucker, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This appeal comes before us upon the same record as the appeal in State, use of Gemundt v. Shipley, No. 12, of the present docket. The two suits were brought for damages for injuries occasioned by the same accident, and the pleadings and evidence are the same in both cases, and the appeals were by agreement heard together.

We affirmed the judgment in Gemundt’s case for the reasons set out in our opinion filed therein. Without repeating what we there said we will affirm the judgment in the present case for the same reasons.

Judgment affirmed with costs.