Case ID: ga-app_36/html/0654-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Bloodworth, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

17922.
    Elliott v. The State.
    Criminal Law, 16 C. J. p. 1180, n. 74.
    Receiving Stolen Goods, 34 Cyc. p. 527, n. 97.
   Bloodworth, J.

There. is nothing in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial that requires a retrial of the ease; the evidence supports the finding of the jury, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Decided April 12, 1927.

Receiving stolen goods; from Whitfield superior court — Judge Tarver. December 27, 1926.

William E. & Gordon Mann, for plaintiff in error.

C. C. Pittman, solicitor-general, J. G. Mitchell, solicitor-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.