Case ID: f2d_33/html/1022-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

George MARTIN, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
    Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
    June 6, 1929.
    No. 18.
    George Martin, pro se.
    Frank Lee, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Muskogee, Okl.
    Before COTTERAL, PHILLIPS, and MeDERMOTT, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

The order of the District Court, overruling the motion of the plaintiff in error for a consideration of his special plea of limitations to .the indictment, and for a vacation of the judgment in this cause, is affirmed, on the authority of Martin v. Biddle (C. C. A.) 16 F.(2d) 118, and U. S. v. Mayer, 235 U. S. 55, 35 S. Ct. 16, 59 L. Ed. 129.

Affirmed.