Case ID: cust-ct_1/html/0341-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 39016.
    Protests 128937-G, etc., of Mills & Gibb Corp. (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record certain handkerchiefs were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 on the authority of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230 were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31.