Case ID: or-app_54/html/0679-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Submitted on record and briefs October 2.
    reversed and remanded for trial November 9, 1981
    STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. BRUCE DOUGLAS HALL, Respondent.
    
    (No. G-81-14, CA A21111)
    635 P2d 681
    Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Salem, William F. Gary, Solicitor General, and Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for appellant.
    Daniel W. Seitz and Cegavske & Seitz, Roseburg, filed the brief for respondent.
    Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Roberts and Young, Judges.
    PER CURIAM.
   PER CURIAM.

The state appeals a trial court order suppressing evidence seized pursuant to a warrant. The trial court found the affidavit in support of the warrant insufficient. We find the challenged affidavit establishes probable cause. See United States v. Ventresca, 380 US 102, 85 S Ct 741, 13 L Ed 2d 684 (1965); United States v. Allen, 588 F2d 1100, 1106 (5th Cir), cert den sub nom Perkins v. United States, 441 US 965, 99 S Ct 2415, 60 L Ed 2d 1071 (1979).

Reversed and remanded for trial.