Case ID: sw3d_19/html/0700-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CITY OF BRECKENRIDGE HILLS, Defendant/Appellant, v. Timothy WALK, Plaintiff/Respondent.
    No. ED 77109.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    May 30, 2000.
    Paul E. Martin, St. Louis, for appellant.
    Timothy Walk, St. Louis, for respondent.
    Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, City of Breckenridge Hills, appeals the trial court’s decision sustaining Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the princi-pies of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).