Case ID: sw2d_967/html/0724-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard HANNA, Claimant-Respondent, v. McDONNELL DOUGLAS AEROSPACE, Employer-Appellant, and Industrial Indemnity, Insurer.
    No. 73120.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    May 26, 1998.
    Evans & Dixon, George T. Floros, St. Louis, for employer-appellant.
    James J. Sievers, Clayton, for employee-respondent.
    Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employer appeals workers’ compensation awards. The awards are supported by competent and substantial evidence and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).