Case ID: nys_141/html/1149-13.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

VAN WINKLE, Respondent, v. WATERMAN et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    May 21, 1913.)
    Action by Cornelia Ann Van Winkle against Elias Waterman and another.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment reversed, and complaint dismissed, with costs, including costs of this appeal. Held that, under the most favorable construction of the evidence and the findings of the trial court, plaintiff is not entitled to a judgment of specific performance; that, if any such contract was made, she has an adequate remedy at law.