Case ID: so3d_19/html/0435-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

A.M.D., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES and Guardian ad Litem Program, Appellees.
    No. 3D09-1110.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Sept. 30, 2009.
    Joseph P. George, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Third Region, and Kevin Colbert, Assistant Counsel, for appellant.
    Karla Perkins, Assistant District Legal Counsel, for appellee Department of Children & Families; Hillary S. Kambour, for appellee Guardian ad Litem Program.
    Before RAMIREZ, C.J., SUAREZ, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

Because the record contains ample evidence to support the termination of appellant-father’s parental rights on grounds of failure to comply with his case plan, § 39.806(l)(e)l., Fla. Stat. (2008), and abandonment, § 39.806(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2008), the judgment under review is affirmed.

Affirmed. 
      
      . We do not reach the sufficiency of the evidence as to section 39.806(l)(c), Florida Statutes (2008).