Case ID: sw3d_527/html/0188-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lashawn WOOTEN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
    No. ED 104668
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: August 29, 2017
    Andrew E. Zleit, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Mov-ant/Appellant.
    Garrick F. D. Aplin, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.
    Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lashawn Wooten appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b). 
      
      . Mo. R. Crim. P. 2015.