Case ID: ind_14/html/0085-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Vail v. Heustis.
    
    APPEAL from the Dearborn Court of Common Pleas.
    
      Monday, December 12.
    
    
      I Schwartz and P. L. Spooner, for the appellant.
    
      D. S. Major, for the appellee.
    
      
       A petition for a rehearing of this case was filed on the 21st of January, and overruled on the 8th of May, 1860.
    
   Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case is affirmed for the reasons given in Vail v. Heustis, at the present term , the facts and questions arising in the record of each case being similar.

The judgment is affirmed with 5 per cent, damages and costs. 
      
       There is no such case.