Case ID: ohio-st-3d_74/html/0204-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Akron Bar Association v. Bonetti.
    [Cite as Akron Bar Assn. v. Bonetti (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 204.]
    (No. 95-1667
    Submitted September 27, 1996
    Decided January 10, 1996.)
    
      
      Constance L. Leistiko and Wayne M. Rice, for relator.
    
      Colopy & Casalinuovo and John A. Casalinuovo, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3) and (6). We also agree with the sanction recommended by the board. Respondent is therefore suspended for two years from the practice of law in Ohio; however, we suspend both years of the sanction period and place respondent on probation under the conditions established by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.