Case ID: sw3d_108/html/0126-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Reginald ARMSTRONG, Appellant.
    No. ED 81030.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
    June 10, 2003.
    Raymund J. Capelovitch, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
    Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Patrick T. Morgan, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
    Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, SR. J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Reginald Armstrong appeals his conviction of domestic assault in both the second and third degree, in violation of sections 565.073 and 565.074 RSMo 2000, respectively, and one count of felonious restraint, in violation of section 565.120. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A detailed opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a brief memorandum opinion, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).