Case ID: nys_69/html/1144-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

READ v. HOBART et al.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    March 12, 1901.)
    Action by Laura Read against George Bf. Hobart and others.
   PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that nothing is presented for our review by the appellant’s exceptions; also, held, that the motion, made by the appellants upon the argument of the appeal, for leave to file exception to referee’s report nunc pro tunc, be denied. All concúr, except SPRING, J., who concurs for affirmance on the merits.