Case ID: f-appx_471/html/0138-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Robert Lee WALSH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; District Court, Clerk of Charleston Division; Mildred L. Rivera, Warden FCI Estill, Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 11-6304.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 6, 2012.
    Decided: April 13, 2012.
    Robert Lee Walsh, Appellant Pro Se.
    Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Robert Lee Walsh, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Walsh’s 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2011) petition. Walsh has also filed a motion to supplement his informal brief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant in part and deny in part his motion to supplement his informal brief and affirm the district court’s judgment. Walsh v. Rivera, No. 8:10-cv-00085-RMG, 2010 WL 4365546 (D.S.C. Oct. 28, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       Absent exceptional circumstances, this court generally does not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal. Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir.1993).