Case ID: so2d_766/html/0410-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NITA CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Robert KAGAN, Appellee.
    No. 3D00-402.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Aug. 16, 2000.
    
      William L. Rogers, Miami, for appellant.
    Stacy Bressler, Miami, for appellee.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Although counsel for Appellee’s summation at trial contained improper arguments, we find these to be harmless. See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1999); Decks, Inc. v. Nunez, 299 So.2d 165 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974).

Affirmed.