Case ID: sw3d_147/html/0813-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Timothy SCHRUM and Myrna Lynn Schrum, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. SULZER SPINE-TECH SURGICAL, INC., Defendant/Respondent.
    No. ED 83814.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Sept. 7, 2004.
    Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 14, 2004.
    Application for Transfer Denied Nov. 23, 2004.
    Thomas Casey, Stephen, Meyerkord & Steven Rineberg, St. Louis, for appellant.
    
      Thomas Sterchi, Patrick Lysaught, Paul Penticuff, Kansas City, for respondent.
    Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Timothy Schrum and Myrna Lynn Schrum, appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant, Sulzer Spine-Tech Surgical, Inc. (Spine-Tech), in their action for negligent entrustment.

We have reviewed the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).