Case ID: ad2d_203/html/0981-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Lena Everett, Respondent, v Melford Everett, Appellant.
    [612 NYS2d 1004]
   —Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Defendant’s child support obligation was properly calculated in accordance with the Child Support Standards Act (see, Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b]). The record supports the Hearing Officer’s determination that the best interests of the children would be served by awarding custody to plaintiff and granting specified visitation to defendant (see, Carr v Carr, 187 AD2d 408, 409).

We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Queens County, Turret, J.H.O. — Divorce.) Present — Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.