Case ID: f-appx_143/html/0822-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, Ghassan Al-Yasin, Claimant—Appellant, v. $178,208.35 IN U.S. CURRENCY, Defendant.
    No. 03-57220.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.
    
    Decided Sept. 14, 2005.
    Michele C. Marchand, Esq., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    David A. Katz, Katz & Associates, Beverly Hill, CA, for Claimant-Appellant.
    Before: SILVERMAN and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, and DUFFY, Senior Judge.
    
      
       This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
    
      
       The Honorable Kevin T. Duffy, Senior District Judge, Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.
    
   MEMORANDUM

Assuming arguendo that Al-Yasin established that his failure to file his response on time was excusable, his motion nevertheless failed to demonstrate that he had a meritorious defense. Casey v. Albertson’s, 362 F.3d 1254, 1260 (9th Cir.2004). The motion does no more than express counsel’s belief that the late-filed opposition to the motion for summary judgment would have precluded summary judgment. This is insufficient. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion.

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.