Case ID: nj-eq_115/html/0074-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary Connolly, petitioner-respondent, v. Guardian Casualty Insurance Company of Buffalo, New York, defendant-appellant.
    [Submitted October 28th, 1933.
    Decided January 5th, 1934.]
    
      
      Messrs. Collins •& Corbin (Edward A. Marhley, of counsel), for the appellant.
    
      Mr. Mario Turtur (Fred E. Shepard, of counsel), for the respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We affirm the opinion below for the reasons given by YiceChancellor Fallon in his opinion. We have nothing to add excepting this: We have' examined the contention of the

appellant that “the counsel fee allowed to counsel for the respondent is excessive.” We think it is not. It was $250, and in the circumstances disclosed by the record was quite justified. The respondent is entitled to costs in this court.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Peeskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.