Case ID: so2d_447/html/0393-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "MILLS, Judge.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Philip I. EMMER and Barbara L. Emmer, d/b/a Brandywine Associates, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, Appellants, v. Trifon and Trudi DUBOLSKY, Appellees.
    No. AV-236.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    March 14, 1984.
    R. Franklin Ritch of Ritch & Graves, P.A., Gainesville, for appellants.
    Jack J. Fine of Fine & Farkash, P.A., Gainesville, for appellees.
   MILLS, Judge.

The Emmers take an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order denying their motion to dismiss the Dubolsky’s complaint, denying their motion for leave to file an amended answer and overruling their objections to the Dubolsky’s interrogatories.

The appeal is taken pursuant to Rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(i) which allows interlocutory appeals from nonfinal orders determining jurisdiction of the person. None of the orders appealed from relate to jurisdiction of the person. The Emmers were properly served and the trial court acquired personal jurisdiction of them.

We dismiss the appeal.

WENTWORTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.