Case ID: ark_179/html/0316-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Kirby, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hopewell School District No. 28 v. Bush.
    Opinion delivered April 1, 1929.
    
      E. II. Tharp, for appellant.
    
      Cunningham & Cunningham, for appellee.
   Kirby, J.

The sole question presented for determination by this appeal is whether a sohool district, in exercising the right of eminent domain, condemning’ lands for school purposes, acquires the entire interest, the fee, in the lands condemned, or only the right to its exclusive use for such purposes so long as it may he so used.

Act 82 of the Acts of the. 1927 Legislature authorizes the exercise of the power of eminent domain hy the school districts in the State, and provides the procedure therefor. In School District of Ogden v. Smith, 113 Ark. 530, 168 S. W. 1089, this court, construing a like provision in an aiot of the Legislature of 1913 for the condemnation of lands for school purposes, held the power conferred was similar to the power of eminent domain conferred upon railroad corporations.

In Rinke v. Union Special School District, 174 Ark. 59, 294 S. W. 910, a case wherein land was condemned for a site for a school building and grounds, the court held the rule for the measure of the owner’s compensation for the land condemned was as declared in Fort Smith & Van Buren District v. Scott, 103 Ark. 405, 147 S. W. 440, “the market value thereof at the time of the taking, for all purposes, comprehending its availability for any use to which it is plainly adapted, as well as the most valuable purpose for which it can be used anci will bring most in the market.”

The interest in the property to be taken or condemned in this proceeding was expressly stated to be the fee, and no lesser estate would be sufficient to satisfy the purpose of the taking — a site for the school building- — and the price to be paid or the compensation for the land condemned was the full market value thereof for all purposes, and the court erred in not making an order condemning the said land for school purposes and vesting the title thereto, the entire interest, the fee, in the school district, in accordance with the statute. See 15'Cyc. 1020, and 20 C. J: 1223, § 583.

The words “for school'purposes” in the statute are not a limitation upon the interest or estate taken in the lands condemned, but upon the right to exercise the power of eminent domain.

For the error designated the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to enter a judgment vesting the entire interest and fee in the lands condemned in the school district.