Case ID: sw3d_507/html/0636-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael B. FALKIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 104037
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
    Filed: January 10, 2017
    Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Atty.. Gen. Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael B. Falkin appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).