Case ID: so2d_655/html/0103-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SHAW, Judge. KOGAN, J., specially concurring.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Terry Michael HUFFINE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
    No. 84962.
    Supreme Court of Florida.
    May 18, 1995.
    James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, for petitioner.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, and Parker D. Thomson and Carol A. Licko, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Miami, for respondent.
   SHAW, Judge.

We have for review Hujfine v. State, 648 So.2d 783 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), wherein the district court certified:

Is section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992), facially unconstitutional as vague and overbroad?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We recently upheld the constitutionality of the ansi-stalking statute. See Bouters v. State, 20 Fla.L.Weekly S186, — So.2d(Fla. Apr. 27, 1995). Accordingly, we approve Hujfine on this issue.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

KOGAN, J., concurs specially with an opinion.

KOGAN, J.,

specially concurring.

Subject to the reservations that I stated in Bouters v. State, 20 Fla.L.Weekly S186, — So.2d-[1995 WL 242403] (Fla. Apr. 27, 1995) (Kogan, J., specially concurring), I concur with the majority.