Case ID: f-appx_31/html/0804-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Michael H. HOLLAND; A. Frank Dunham; Marty D. Hudson; Elliot A. Segal, as Trustee of the United Mine Workers of America 1992 Benefit Plan, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. LAKE ENERGY, Incorporated, a corporation; Thunder Mountain Energy, Incorporated, a corporation, Defendants, and Carey Cline, Intervenor-Appellant.
    No. 01-1939.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Feb. 26, 2002.
    Decided March 11, 2002.
    Mychal S. Schulz, Schumacher, Francis & Nelson, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. David W. Allen, Larry D. Newsome, Jonathan Sokolow, Christopher F. Clarke, United Mine Workers of America Health and Retirement Funds, Washington, D.C.,.for Appellees.
    Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
   PER CURIAM.

Carey Cline appeals from the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from the court’s judgment order directing the West Virginia Commissioner of Labor to draw on a wage bond to satisfy an unpaid judgment. We have previously granted the motion to submit this case for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. We now affirm.

Cline asserts that the district court abused its discretion in denying his Rule 60(b) motion and that the court did not have the authority to issue a suggestion order directing the Commissioner of Labor to draw on the wage bond. We have reviewed the materials in the Joint Appendix and the arguments presented in the parties’ briefs and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. See Heyman v. M.L. Mktg. Co., 116 F.3d 91, 94 (4th Cir.1997). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Holland v. Lake Energy, Inc., No. CA-98-467-2 (S.D.W. Va. June 18, 2001).

AFFIRMED.