Case ID: so2d_412/html/0973-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Douglas S. MANLEY, Appellant, v. Jeri MANLEY, Appellee.
    No. 81-2753.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    April 27, 1982.
    
      Lawrence & Daniels and Adam H. Lawrence, Miami, for appellant.
    Gary N. Holthus, Miami, for appellee.
    Before HENDRY and PEARSON, DANIEL and FERGUSON, JJ.
   ON MOTION TO REVIEW ORDER FOR STAY

PER CURIAM.

Having heard oral argument and considered the trial court’s order granting stay of proceeding pending appeal provided the Respondent/husband post bond in the amount of $10,000.00 within thirty days, we conclude that the trial court was correct in setting bond in this amount. However, the order should have provided that the husband’s entire equity in the house together with his stock interest could be used in lieu of a cash or surety bond.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.