Case ID: nc_356/html/0288-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

IN THE MATTER OF: MITCHELL, M., A minor child, d.o.b. 12/24/94 IN THE MATTER OF: MITCHELL, K., a minor child, d.o.b. 01/16/98 IN THE MATTER OF: MITCHELL, K., a minor child, d.o.b. 02/06/96
    No. 127A02
    (Filed 4 October 2002)
    Termination of Parental Rights— dispositional stage — best interests of children — proper determination
    The decision of the Court of Appeals remanding a termination of parental rights case is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion that the trial court did not place an improper burden on respondent in the dispositional stage to show that termination is not in the children’s best interest and that the trial court did not fail to exercise its discretion in finding that termination would be in the best interests of the children.
    Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 148 N.C. App. 483, 559 S.E.2d 237 (2002), affirming in part, reversing in part, and remanding orders entered 16 November 2000 by Pool, J., in District Court, Transylvania County. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 September 2002.
    
      Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, P.L.L.C., by Stuart A. Brock, for appellant Guardian ad Litem.
    
    
      Charles W. McKellerfor respondent-appellee Cynthia Chatman.
    
   PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion.

REVERSED.