Case ID: nys_92/html/1127-13.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

HALSEY, Respondent, v. HOLLANDS et al., Appellants.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.
    January 10, 1905.)
    Action by Anna Halsey against William Hollands, as administrator, etc., and another.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held that, in view of the rule that in this class of cases the evidence must be clear and satisfactory, the verdict in this case should be set aside as against the weight of evidence.

CHASE and HOUGHTON, JJ„, dissent.