Case ID: nys_130/html/1111-10.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM. SPRING, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FOGELSANGER, Respondent, v. GEHRES, Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    July 11, 1911.)
    Action by Calvin Fogelsanger against Anna Gehres.
   PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the trial court should have discharged the jury, when requested to do so by defendant’s counsel, because of repeated inflammatory and improper remarks by plaintiff’s counsel before the jury, after being warned.

SPRING, J.,

dissents, upon the ground that there is no claim made that the verdict is excessive.