Case ID: so2d_479/html/0320-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Bart WIENER, Appellant, v. Charles H. POPE, Charles H. Pope and Associates, Inc., and Two Rivers Associates, Inc., Appellees.
    No. 85-503.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Dec. 17, 1985.
    Bryson & Berman, P.A., and John E. Bergendahl, Miami, for appellant.
    Jones & Foster, P.A., and Margaret L. Cooper and Neil Hayes, West Palm Beach, for appellees.
    Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

Bart Wiener, a broker, brought an action to recover his commission for brokering a mortgage loan. The trial court granted appellees’ motion to dismiss on the stated basis that “since the construction mortgage loan contemplated by the commitment was never actually closed, the [complaint] failed to state a cause of action.” This case is factually indistinguishable from S & D Enterprises, Inc. v. Sonnenblick-Goldman Southeast Corp., 310 So.2d 343 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), and we reverse on that authority-

Reversed and remanded.