Case ID: ohio-st_43/html/0063-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "By the Court.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Gordon Shilito et. al., Exrs., etc. v. John A. Thacker, Admr., etc.
    
      Bill of exceptions— When not considered part of record.
    
    Error to the District Court of Hamilton county.
    
      G. B. Matthews and Ramsey $ Matthews, for the plaintiffs in error.
    
      ■Goppock 8¡ Goppock, for defendants in error.
   By the Court.

A paper purporting to be a bill of exceptions, but which is not signed as required by statute, will not be considered as a part of the record, although the journal entry in the case recites that a bill of exceptions was duly signed, sealed, allowed and ordered to be made part of the record, and no other paper purporting to be a bill of exceptions appears in the files of the ease. Rankin v. Sanderson, 35 Ohio St. 482, approved and followed.

Judgment of the district court reversed and that of the common pleas affirmed.