Case ID: vt_144/html/0647-05.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Armand G. PEPIN v. Lorraine PEPIN.
    [470 A.2d 224]
    No. 556-81
    January 9, 1984.
   In the absence of findings of fact, which in this case were waived, our review of the record discloses that there is a reasonable evidentiary basis to support the judgment. Lanphere v. Beede, 141 Vt. 126, 128, 446 A.2d 340, 341 (1982). Since the trial court did not withhold its discretion, abuse it, or exercise it on grounds clearly untenable or to an extent clearly unreasonable, the judgment is affirmed.