Case ID: nj-eq_85/html/0207-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Dinah Schneider et al., respondents, v. Emma Schmidt et al., appellants.
    [Argued June 22d, 1915.
    Decided November 15th, 1915.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice,-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in 8L N. J. Eq. IS. '
    
      Mr. Alfred F. Stevens, for the appellants.
    
      Mr. William 4. Lord, for the respondents.
   Pee Curiam.

The decree order appealed from will be affirmed,.for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Emery.

■For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchaed, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor—11.

For reversal—None.