Case ID: ad2d_83/html/0502-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Kupferman, J. P., dissents in a memorandum as follows:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In the Matter of American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v Tax Commission of the City of New York et al., Appellants-Respondents.
   Final order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Bowman, J.), entered October 3, 1974, which reduced the assessments for five out of the nine years in question, reversed, on the law and the facts, petition dismissed and assessments reinstated and confirmed, with costs. Findings of fact inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings made consistent herewith. The petitioner has not sustained its burden of overcoming the presumption of the validity of the assessments by showing by substantial evidence that they were excessive. In this case the record shows that petitioner’s low appraisal is insufficient to meet the standard. In addition, the reductions allowed by Special Term have inadequate support in the record. (Matter of Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v Tax Comm. of City of N. Y., 31 AD2d 606; Matter of General Motors Corp. v Finance Administrator of City of N. Y., 70 AD2d 843; Matter of Union Carbide Corp. v Finance Administrator of City of N. Y., 70 AD2d 844.) We find the assessments do not exceed the value of the property. Concur — Sandler, Ross, Carro and Silverman, JJ.

Kupferman, J. P., dissents in a memorandum as follows:

I would affirm. It is obvious that the trial court analyzed the situation with respect to two periods and separated them in its determination, confirming the assessments for the late 1960’s and reducing them for the early 1970’s. The economic realities for the period of the reductions with the then glut of office space on the market, justify the reduction. While it is difficult in the present inflationary economic climate to consider the Avenue of the Americas in retrospect, in the early 1970’s real estate values in that area were in a decline. (Cf. Comptroller of State of N. Y. v Avon Associates, 58 AD2d 752, mot for lv to app den 43 NY2d 644, involving 1166 Avenue of the Americas.)