Case ID: sw3d_193/html/0773-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Hugh LAW, Appellant, v. VIGILANT INSURANCE CO., et al., Respondents.
    No. ED 86943.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
    May 9, 2006.
    Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 13, 2006.
    Hugh R. Law, Lowenhaupt & Chasnoff, LLC, St. Louis, pro-se.
    Elizabeth A. Bradley, Knapp, Ohl & Green, Edwardsville, IL, for Respondent, Vigilant Ins. Co.
    Russell F. Watters, Thomas M. Ward, Brown & James, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for Respondent, The Cincinatti Ins. Co.
    Michael Patrick Stephens, Jenkins <& Kling, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for Respondent, Katherine & Sarah Law.
    Theodore Joseph Williams, Jr., St. Louis, MO, for Respondent, City of St. Louis & Gateway Council of Hostelling InÜ.-American Youth Hostels.
    Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Hugh Law (“Law”) appeals from the decision of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, the Honorable David L. Dowd presiding, granting Respondent Vigilant Insurance Company’s and Cincinnati Insurance Company’s motions for summary judgment dismissing Law’s petition for declaratory judgment.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been given a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).