Case ID: f-appx_595/html/0991-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., HTC America Inc, United States Cellular Corporation, Sprint Spectrum, L.P., Motorola Solutions, Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 2014-1496.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    March 6, 2015.
    
      Teresa M. Summers, Morrison & Foer-ster LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by John L. Hendricks, Daniel Robinson Scar-dino, John Matthew Murrell, Reed & Scar-dino LLP, Austin, TX.
    L. Norwood Jameson, Duane Morris LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for defendant-appellees. Defendant-appellee Cisco Systems, Inc., also represented by Alison Haddock Hutton, Matthew Yungwirth, John R. Gibson; Joseph Powers, Philadelphia, PA. Defendant-appellee HTC America Inc, also represented by Fred I. Williams, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP, Austin, TX; Eric Joseph Klein, Todd Eric Landis, Dallas, TX. Defendant-appellee United States Cellular Corporation, also represented by Richard John O’Brien, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL; Bryan K. Anderson, Ashish Nagdev, Sid-ley Austin LLP, Palo Alto, CA; Ryan C. Morris, Washington, DC. Defendant-appel-lee Sprint Spectrum, L.P., also represented by John J. Cotter, Venkata Raman Bharatula, K & L Gates LLP, Boston, MA. Defendant-appellees Motorola Solutions, Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC, also represented by Steven Moore, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, San Francisco, CA; Carl Elliott Sanders, Winston-Salem, NC; Frederick Lee Whitmer, New York, NY; Christopher Schenck, Seattle, WA.
    WALLACH and HUGHES, Circuit Judges, and FOGEL, District Judge .
    
      
       Honorable Jeremy Fogel, District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and Director of the Federal Judicial Center, sitting by designation.
    
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.