Case ID: neb_234/html/0255-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard R. Thiem, appellee and cross-appellant, v. Elissa A. Thiem, appellant and cross-appellee.
    450 N.W.2d 660
    Filed January 26, 1990.
    No. 88-028.
    William T. Ginsburg, of Zuber & Ginsburg, for appellant.
    Debra Stangl, of Bradford, Coenen, Ashford & Stangl, for appellee.
    
      Hastings, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, and Fahrnbruch, J J.
   Per Curiam.

Based on the briefs and the recommendation of the Appellate Division of the District Court, and upon a de novo review of the record, the judgment of the district court is modified as set forth in the recommendation of the Appellate Division of the District Court.

Affirmed as modified.