Case ID: so2d_861/html/0107-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John McDOWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 1D02-3124.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
    Dec. 18, 2003.
    Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Richard M. Summa, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
    Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Daniel A. David, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

We affirm, but, as in Walker v. State, 853 So.2d 498 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), certify the following question to be one of great public importance:

IS THE FLORIDA STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTION ON “POSSESSION OF PROPERTY RECENTLY STOLEN” AN IMPERMISSIBLE COMMENT ON THE EVIDENCE?

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, C.J., ERVIN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.