Case ID: ga_191/html/0675-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Duckworth, Justice.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Smith v. Smith.
    No. 13603.
    March 14, 1941.
   Duckworth, Justice.

The petition seeks to enjoin enforcement of a contempt order for non-payment of a judgment for alimony, and to set aside the alimony judgment, on grounds of alleged fraud. An exhibit attached to the petition shows a written acknowledgment of service, waiver of process, and appearance, signed by this petitioner, which it is admitted was filed as a part of the pleadings in the alimony proceeding. The petition alleges that this acknowledgment of service was intended for the divorce suit only, and that the fraud consists in the fact that the suit was for divorce and alimony. The acknowledgment of service and waiver of process identifies the suit by naming the parties and the court and the return term. The exception is to a judgment sustaining a general demurrer and dismissing the petition. Held, that, under the facts as shown by the petition, the defendant in the alimony suit is conclusively presumed to have known the contents of the petition; and if he suffered an unwarranted judgment, it is due to his negligence, and he is bound thereby. There was no error in the judgment sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the petition. Code, § 81-211; Hill v. Hatcher, 53 Ga. 291; Epps v. Buckmaster, 104 Ga. 698 (30 S. E. 959); Henry v. Johnson, 178 Ga. 541 (173 S. E. 659).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. ■

Howard, Henson & Howard and Thomas H. Goodwin, for plaintiff.

Craighead & Dwyer, for defendant.