Case ID: f-appx_427/html/0267-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Antonio Martinelle RANDOLPH, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. L. Fuertes ROSARIO, HSA-MLP; John J. Lamanna, Warden; G. Link, Physicians Assistant, Defendants—Appellees.
    No. 10-7731.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: April 28, 2011.
    Decided: May 3, 2011.
    Antonio Martinelle Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
   PER CURIAM:

Antonio Martinelle Randolph appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Randolph’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Randolph v. Rosario, No. 9:09-cv-03166-RMG, 2010 WL 4967888 (D.S.C. Dec. 1, 2010). We deny Randolph’s motion for stay and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.