Case ID: ad_158/html/0911-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Second Department,
    September, 1913.
    Richard Powers Phelan, Respondent, v. The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Appellant.
    Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 31st day of December, 1913, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 6th day of January, 1913, denying a motion for a new trial.
   Per Curiam:

While we look upon this case as a close one, both upon the law and the facts, we think that the question of the defendant’s negligence cannot be disposed of as one of law. Hor do we think that, considering the sharp conflict of evidence, and the serious questions of credibility which arose upon the trial, we should be justified in setting aside the verdict of the jury as against the weight of evidence. The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.