Case ID: ohio-st-3d_71/html/0611-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Cincinnati Bar Association v. Wolosin.
    [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Wolosin (1995), 71 Ohio St.3d 611.]
    
      (No. 94-1375
    Submitted January 10, 1995
    Decided March 22, 1995.)
    
      
      Rebecca K. Kaye and Thomas R. Smith, for relator.
    
      Kondritzer, Gold, Frank & Crowley Co., L.P.A., and Mark R. Naegel, for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is therefore suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for two years, but the suspension is stayed, and respondent is placed on probation under the conditions set by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.