Case ID: cma_15/html/0017-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES, Appellee v WILLIAM E. KAUFMAN, Specialist Five, U. S. Army, Appellant
    15 USCMA 17, 34 CMR 463
    No. 17,741
    August 21, 1964
    
      Colonel Joseph L. Chalk, Captain Charles W. Schiesser, and Captain J. Philip Johnson were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.
    
      Colonel Bruce C. Babbitt and First Lieutenant Joseph H. Crosby were on the brief for Appellee, United States.
   Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, the accused was convicted of a mail offense, forgery, and absence without leave, in violation, respectively, of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Articles 134, 123, and 86, 10 USC §§ 934, 923, 886. He was sentenced to dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement at hard labor for five years. As a result of the pretrial arrangement for the entry of accused’s guilty pleas, the convening authority reduced the period of confinement involved to one year, but otherwise approved the sentence. The board of review affirmed, and we granted accused’s petition for review upon the issue of the propriety of the law officer’s instructions on the sentence.

The advice, although delivered by a different law officer, is similar to that condemned by us in United States v Ellis, 15 USCMA 8, 34 CMR 454, this day decided. As the circumstances of the case indicate the existence of a fair risk of prejudice to the accused, it follows that the sentence must be set aside.

The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army. A rehearing on the sentence may be ordered.