Case ID: cal-app_33/html/0807-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      THE COURT.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

[Civ. No. 2230.
    Second Appellate District.
    March 26, 1917.]
    JOHN LAPIQUE, Appellant, v. FRANK E. WALSH, Administrator of the Estate of Laurent Etchepare, Deceased, Respondent.
    Appeal Dismissed, on the authority of Lapigue v. Plummer, ante, p. 317.
    APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Fred H. Taft, Judge.
    The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in La-pique v. Plummer, ante, p. 317.
    John Lapique, in pro. per., for Appellant.
    H. H. Appel, and Horace Bell, for Respondent.
   THE COURT.

It appearing that the facts in this case are identical with those involved in Civil No. 2231, entitled John Lapique, Appellant, v. Eugene R. Plummer et al., Respondents, ante, p. 317, wherein an opinion was this day filed dismissing the appeal, it is ordered, upon the authority of the opinion so filed in said last-mentioned ease, that the appeal herein be and the same is dismissed.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 24, 1917.