Case ID: sw3d_420/html/0676-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

James A. ATCHISON, Respondent, v. PORTER POULTRY, INC., Appellant.
    No. ED 98634.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
    Feb. 4, 2014.
    William Stuart Thomas, John Joseph Fischesser II, Co-Counsel, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Thomas Cicardi Devoto, Devoto Law Firm, Andrew William Kuhlmann, Co-Counsel, Kuhlmann LLC, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent (cross-appellant).
    Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Porter Poultry, Inc., (Porter Poultry) appeals from the trial court’s judgment following a jury verdict in favor of James A. Atchison (Atchison) on Atchison’s negligence claim against Porter Poultry. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). 
      
      . Atchison initially filed a cross-appeal, which he subsequently dismissed.