Case ID: mich_125/html/0181-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

J. E. GREILICK CO. v. HARTZELL.
    Mechanics’ Liens — Defenses.
    Case ruled by Hannah & Lay Mercantile Co. v. Hartzell, ante, 177.
    Appeal from Wexford; Aldrich, J.
    Submitted June 12, 1900.
    Decided November 13, 1900.
    Bill by the J. E. Greilick Company against S. E. Hartzell, Charles H. Bostick, and others to enforce a mechanic’s lien. From a decree for complainant, defendant Bostick appeals.
    Affirmed.
    
      Manly C. Dodge, for complainant.
    
      I. C. Wheeler (Sawyer & Bishop, of counsel), for appellant.
   Per Curiam.

This case involves the identical questions that were raised in the case of the Hannah & Lay Mercantile Company against the same defendants, ante, 177 (84 N. W. 52). That case is controlling of the present. - The decree must be affirmed.