Case ID: pa_456/html/0529-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Pee Curiam,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Commonwealth v. Coplin, Appellant.
    Before Jones, C. J., Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix and Manderino, JJ.
    
      
      Drew Salomon, Assistant Defender, with him John W. Paclcel, Assistant Defender, and Vincent J. Ziccardi, Defender, for appellant.
    
      David Richman, Assistant District Attorney, with him James T. Romney and Milton M. Stein, Assistant District Attorneys, and Arlen Specter, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
    May 22, 1974:
   Opinion

Pee Curiam,

The petition for allocatur is granted. We agree with the reasoning of the Opinion in Support of Reversal in the Superior Court that the evidence is insufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction of larceny. Commonwealth v. Coplin, 226 Pa. Superior Ct. 146, 147, 313 A.2d 349, 349 (1973) (Spaeth, J., Opinion in Support of Reversal, joined by Jacobs and Hoffman, JJ.).

The judgment of sentence is reversed and appellant discharged.