Case ID: misc_188/html/0180-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Al Roth, Respondent, v. Hotel Riverside Plaza, Inc., Appellant.
    Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
    January 9, 1947.
    
      George J. Stacy and Frank B. Gass for appellant.
    
      Robert Levine and Frederick E. M. Ballon for respondent.
   Per Curiam.

Memobahdum Plaintiff was admittedly indebted to defendant for unpaid rent and it had the right to retain possession of any property stored with it until the debt was paid (Lien Law, § 181). Plaintiff not having paid the same was, therefore, not entitled to immediate possession. Such payment was a condition precedent to making out a cause of action in conversion (Jackson v. Appleton, 50 Hun 604, opinion in 2 N. Y. S. 787). Moreover, the mere loss of the property does not constitute a tortious conversion (Salt Springs National Bank v. Wheeler, 48 N. Y. 492, 495; Magnin v. Dinsmore, 70 N. Y. 410, 417).

The judgment should he reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Hammer, Shientag and Edeb, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.