Case ID: conn_243/html/0249-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

JEFFREY D. FISI ET AL. v. HOLLY B. CYR ET AL.
    (SC 15583)
    Callahan, C. J., and Berdon, Norcott, Katz and Palmer, Js.
    Argued October 1
    officially released November 11, 1997
    
      Martin M. Rutchik, with whom, on the brief, was Sharon L. Gibbs, for the appellant (named plaintiff).
    
      Richard D. Haviland, for the appellee (named defendant).
   Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.

The appeal is dismissed. 
      
       We granted the named plaintiffs petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court; Fisi v. Cyr, 43 Conn. App. 911, 684 A.2d 280 (1996); limited to the following issue: “In the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly affirm the judgment of the trial court denying the plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the verdict based upon allegedly improper communications made by court personnel to the jury during its deliberations?” Fisi v. Cyr, 239 Conn. 955, 688 A.2d 325 (1996).