Case ID: ala-app_25/html/0636-06.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "SAMFORD, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

140 So. 925
    Benton HARRIS and Reeder Bishop v. STATE.
    6 Div. 129, 130.
    Court of Appeals of Alabama.
    Jan. 19, 1932.
    Rehearing Denied March 1, 1932.
    Ernest B. Fite, of Hamilton, and H. H. Hamilton, of Russellville, for appellants.
    Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.
   SAMFORD, J.

Defendants were convicted of manufacturing whisky. The sole question presented by this record is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction. We have read the record and find the evidence sufficient. The affirmative charge was properly refused.

The judgment is affirmed.