Case ID: wis_211/html/0641-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Nelson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Espenhains Dry Goods Company, Appellant, vs. Kurzon, Respondent.
    
      March 7
    
    June 6, 1933.
    
    
      For the appellant there was a brief by Robert A. Hess, attorney, and Benjamin Poss, Clement Winzenburg, and Joseph P. Brazy of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Brazy, Mr. Poss, and Mr. Winzenburg.
    
    For the respondent there was a brief by Rubin & Zabel, attorneys, and W. B. Rubin and R. R. Staii-ff of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Stauff and Mr. Rubin.
    
   The following opinion was filed April 11, 1933 :

Nelson, J.

The issues in this case were tried at the same time that the issues in Kurzon v. Espenhains Dry Goods Co., decided this day (ante, p. 629, 248 N. W. 149), were tried. The outcome of this action was obviously bound up with that of the other action. Had the judgment in the Kurzon action been sustained it would then follow that the judgment herein would have to be affirmed. However, the judgment in the Kurzon action was reversed with directions to dismiss the complaint therein. It therefore follows that the judgment herein which dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint was erroneous.

By the Court. — Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings.

Wickhem, J., took no part.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, without costs, on June 6, 1933.