Case ID: so2d_502/html/0074-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, Appellant, v. Roxana DIAZ-PAEZ and Wilfredo Fife, Appellees.
    No. 86-950.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    Feb. 10, 1987.
    Merritt, Sikes & Craig, P.A., and William L. Summers, Miami, for appellant.
    Arthur J. Morburger, Miami, for appel-lees.
    Before BARKDULL, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
   PER CURIAM.

We agree with the appellant, National Union, that the factual issue of a knowing rejection of uninsured motorist coverage remains in this case. It was error, therefore, for the trial court to have granted summary judgment. See Commercial Union Ins. Co. v. Velazquez, 464 So.2d 210 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.