Case ID: sw3d_359/html/0539-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Richard C. SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 96289.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
    Feb. 21, 2012.
    Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
    Chris Koster, Attorney General, John M. Reeves, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
    Before KURT S. ODENWALD, C.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J„ and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Simmons appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Simmons’ request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedéntial value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).