Case ID: cust-ct_4/html/0466-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Tilson, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

No. 43634.
    Protests 193064-G, etc., of Lord & Taylor (New York).
   Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel embroidered-net galloons similar to those involved in Abstract 12555, filet lace articles like those covered by United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Normandy laces similar to those passed upon in United States v. Amrein (26 id. 353, C. A. D. 40), and embroidered wearing apparel like that the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.