Case ID: ohio-st-3d_63/html/0135-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Sweeney, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Meadows, Appellant.
    [Cite as State v. Meadows (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 135.]
    (No. 91-1080
    Submitted February 11, 1992
    Decided March 4, 1992.)
    
      Arthur M. Ney, Jr., Prosecuting Attorney, and Leonard Kirschner, for appellee.
    
      Randall M. Dana, Ohio Public Defender, and Wendie A. Gerus, for appellant.
   The cause is affirmed on the authority of State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204. However, defendant-appellant may file for delayed reconsideration of his ineffectiveness-of-counsel claim in the Hamilton County Court of Appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Sweeney, J.,

dissents based on his dissent in State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204.

Wright and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.