Case ID: ga-app_32/html/0501-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Luke, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

15602.
    Wyatt v. The State.
    Decided July 15, 1924.
    Indictment for assault with intent to murder; from Fulton superior court — Judge W. E. Thomas presiding. March 24, 1924.
    
      O. Q. Battle, for plaintiff in error.
    
      John A. Boylcin, solicitor-general, E. A. Stephens, R. II. Pharr, contra.
   Luke, J.

1. The alleged errors of omission and commission in the charge of the court, complained of in the motion for a new trial, do not, when considered in the light of the entire charge and the facts of the case, require a reversal of the judgment below.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and for no reason assigned was it error for the court to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodivorth, J., concur.