Case ID: nj_62/html/0019-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

CARMELA LENA, ADMINISTRATIX OF THE ESTATE OF FAUST LENA AND ADMINISTRATIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF FAUST LENA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CLARENCE ENSLEY, ANTHONY DiPIETRO, NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, GIORDANO AND MOLAR TRUCKING CO., INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
    Argued December 5, 1972
    Decided December 18, 1972.
    
      Mr. Gerald S. Gordon argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Pincus, Sheehan & Hendriclcs, attorneys).
    
      Mr. Henry H. Rubenson argued the cause for respondents.
   Per Curiam.

This matter comes to us as of right because of dissent in the Appellate Division. The judgment of the-Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for reasons expressed in the majority opinion.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Wbintraub, Justices Jacobs, Hall and Mountain, and Judges Coneord, Sullivan and Lewis — 7.

For reversal — None.