Case ID: f-appx_677/html/0186-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM: \n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Raul SAUCEDO, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
    No. 15-41701 Conference Calendar
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Filed February 21, 2017
    
      Dan Ryan Locker, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
    Raul Saucedo, Jr., Pro Se
    Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM:

The attorney appointed to represent Raul Saucedo, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Saucedo has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Saucedo’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 
      
       Pursuant To 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court Has Determined That This Opinion Should Not Be Published and Is Not Precedent Except Under the Limited Circumstances Set Forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.