Case ID: sw3d_374/html/0402-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

John WILLIAMSON d/b/a Williamson Brothers Lawn & Landscaping, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Appellant.
    No. ED 97266.
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
    Aug. 28, 2012.
    Al W. Johnson, St. Louis, MO, for Plain-tifi/Respondent.
    Amy Hardin Surber, St. Louis, MO, for Defendani/Appellant.
    Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
   ORDER

PER CURIAM.

American Family Mutual Insurance Company appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of John Williamson d/b/a Williamson Brothers Lawn & Landscaping on Williamson’s petition for breach of contract. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the trial court was supported by substantial evidence, was not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law. Lagermann v. Farm Bureau Town and Country Ins. Co. of Missouri, 356 S.W.3d 780, 784 (Mo.App. S.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).