Case ID: so2d_816/html/0208-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jeffrey Howard VAN POYCK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 3D01-1863.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
    May 8, 2002.
    Rehearing Denied May 29, 2002.
    Jeffrey Howard Van Poyck, in proper person.
    Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Linda S. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before JORGENSON and SHEVIN, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
   PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is barred as successive. See, e.g., Walker v. State, 814 So.2d 516 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). “The defendant is abusing the judicial process by filing successive motions that attempt to litigate issues that were, could, or should have been raised either on direct appeal or in his previous motions.” Duncan v. State, 728 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

AFFIRMED.