Case ID: f-appx_573/html/0251-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael HILL, a/k/a Saleet, a/k/a Steve Philip, a/k/a Junito Tomilson, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 13-8043.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: May 22, 2014.
    Decided: May 28, 2014.
    Michael Hill, Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.
   Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. •

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Hill appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hill, No. 7:96-cr-00042-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.