Case ID: tenn_1/html/0383-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam.\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FISK vs. COPELAND.
    Covenant for the delivery of staves. It was proved that Stowel was a partner of Fisk’s in merchandize ; that the consideration of this covenant was merchandize, and that Stowel carried the staves down the river for the purpose of sale. It was moved to prove what Stowel had said respecting the receipt of the staves.
    The admissions of one partner are evidence against all, as to partnership transactions.
    Hamilton for plaintiff.
    Harris and Barry for defendant.
   Per Curiam.

In partnership transactions, the acknowledgments of any one concerned in interest, may be received in evidence, though the suit may not be in the name of the firm. 
      
      1Tyler’s R. 452. Taunton, 104, 2 Bay. 533.