Case ID: f_91/html/1004-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

ROBERTSON v. FLEITMAN et al.
    (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
    January 5, 1899.)
    No. 6.
    In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
    Henry B. Platt, for plaintiff in error.
    Byman Tremain, for defendants in error.
    Before WALLACE, LACOMBE, and SHIPMAN, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

The facts and the questions presented are substantially the same as in Robertson v. Edelhoff (decided herewith) 91 Fed. 642. The plaintiff in error further contends in this case that, as to four importations, the duty was not paid to get possession of the goods. As this point was not raised below, and is not included in the assignment of errors, it cannot be considered here. Judgment affirmed.