Case ID: sw3d_558/html/0603-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Nicholas NETTLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
    No. ED 105894
    Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
    Filed: October 9, 2018
    FOR APPELLANT: Kevin L. Schriener, Law & Schriener, LLC, 141 North Meramec Avenue, Suite 314, Clayton, Missouri 63105.
    FOR RESPONDENT: Julia E. Neidhardt, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
    Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J. and Mary K. Hoff, J.
    ORDER
   PER CURIAM

Nicholas Nettles ("Movant") appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Movant's sole point on appeal is his trial counsel was ineffective for advising him to admit to the prior uncharged bad act of striking J.J. and counsel conceding in his opening statement that Movant struck J.J. Finding no clear error, we affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order under to Rule 84.16.