Case ID: so2d_221/html/0009-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

M. G. CONLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
    No. 68-389.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
    April 9, 1969.
    Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, and Joseph F. McDermott, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.
    Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William D.' Roth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.
   PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Morgan v. State (Fla.App.2d 1962), 142 So.2d 308 and Rohdin v. State (Fla.App.2d 1958), 105 So.2d 371.

This case is clearly distinguishable from Specht v. Patterson (1967), 386 U.S. 605, 87 S.Ct. 1209, 18 L.Ed.2d 326, and Townsend v. Burke (1948), 334 U.S. 736, 68 S.Ct. 1252, 92 L.Ed. 1690; and our decision is wholly consonant with Williams v. New York (1949), 337 U.S. 241, 69 S.Ct. 1079, 93 L.Ed. 1337.

LILES, C. J., and PIERCE and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.