Case ID: ohio-law-abs_8/html/0459-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

FARNSWORTH v SONDELS et
    Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Summit Co
    No 1718.
    Decided May 27, 1930
    Walter R. East, Akron, for Farnsworth.
    S. A. Decker, Barberton, for Sondéis, et.
   PER CURIAM

After a careful consideration we have reached the conclusion that the circumstances' are not such as to estop the defendant from discontinuing the arrangement made for a joint driveway and using the part thereof which is upon his property for the purpose of constructing a separate driveway and using dll of his lot the same as if no joint driveway had existed.

Plaintiff’s petition is therefore dismissed, at her costs.

Funk, PJ, Pardee, J, and Washburn, J, concur.