Case ID: f-appx_22/html/0165-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Nathaniel CHAPMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 01-7302.
    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 8, 2001.
    Decided Nov. 19, 2001.
    Mark Nathaniel Chapman, pro se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD; Barbara Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Deborah A. Johnston, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenbelt, MD, for appellee.
    Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
   PER CURIAM.

Mark Nathaniel Chapman seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Chapman, Nos. CR-97-478-AW; CA-00-2695-AW (D.Md. July 13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.