Case ID: nj-eq_99/html/0885-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Per Curiam.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mary V. Hebble, respondent, v. Amos S. Hebble, appellant.
    [Decided May 17th, 1926.]
    On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, whose opinion is reported in 99 N. J. Eq. 58.
    
    
      Mr. Frank B. Pentlarge, for the respondent.
    
      2Iessrs. McDermott, Enright & Carpenter, for the appellant.
   Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by. Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teen chard, Parker, Minttjrn, Kalis ch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 14.

For reversal — Hone.