Case ID: nys_87/html/1148-08.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SILER, Respondent, v. BATH & H. R. CO., Appellant.
    (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
    March 29, 1904.)
    Action by Charles Siler against the Bath & Hammondsport Railroad Company.
   PER CURIAM.

Order granting new trial reversed, with costs, and judgment directed in favor of the defendant upon the verdict. Held that, the jury having found the plaintiff was not free from contributory negligence, he was not entitled to recover, even although, the defendant was guilty of negligence.