Case ID: f-appx_623/html/0391-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mercedes Molano OLIVER, a.k.a. Mercedes M. Oliver, a.k.a. Mercedes Sanchez-Molano, a.k.a. Beatriz Eugenia Zavala-Gomez, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 14-10529.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Submitted Nov. 18, 2015.
    
    Filed Nov. 24, 2015.
    Ryan Ellersiek, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, Plaintiff-Appellee.
    Matthew J. McGuire, Patagonia, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
    Mercedes Molano Oliver, Florence, AZ, pro se.
    
      Before: TASHIMA, OWENS, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
    
   MEMORANDUM

Mercedes Molano Oliver appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 40-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for attempted reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Oliver argues that the district court procedurally erred by failing to address her request for a downward variance. We review for plain error, see United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir.2010), and find none. The record reflects that the district court granted a downward variance after considering Oliver’s arguments and adequately explained the sentence. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED. 
      
       This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.