Case ID: ohio-st-3d_87/html/0559-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

AT&T Wireless PCS, Inc. et al., Appellants, v. Beavercreek Township Board of Zoning Appeals et al., Appellees.
    [Cite as AT&T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. Beavercreek Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals (2000), 87 Ohio St.3d 559.]
    (No. 98-2482
    Submitted October 20, 1999
    Decided January 19, 2000.)
    
      Barrett & Weber, C. Francis Barrett and M. Michele Fleming, for appellants.
    
      Wead, Anderson, Phipps & Aultman and Alan G. Anderson, for appellees.
    
      Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Kathleen B. Burke and Randall A. Cole, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Nextel Communications, Inc.
    
      William F. Schenck, Greene County Prosecuting Attorney, and Suzanne M. Schmidt, Senior Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, urging affirmance for amici curiae, Ceasarscreek Township, Miami Township, Cedarville Township, Sugar-creek Township, Xenia Township, New Jasper Township, Spring Valley Township, Bath Township, and Ross Township.
   The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded on the authority of Symmes Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Smyth (2000), 87 Ohio St.3d 549, 721 N.E.2d 1057.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, O’Donnell, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Terrence O’Donnell, J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting for Resnick, J.