Case ID: tex_121/html/0495-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": " PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Elbridge Ball v. Mann Commission Company.
    App. No. 18761.
    Decided May 21, 1932.
    (50 S. W., 2d Series, 1090.)
    
      Slay & Simon, of Fort Worth, and Murphy & Murphy, of - Gainesville, for plaintiff in error.
   PER CURIAM.

We have dismissed this cause for want of jurisdiction because we believe the Court of Civil Appeals properly reversed and remanded this cause for another trial. We do not pass upon the question as to whether defendant in error is entitled to maintain this suit if its right to do business has been forfeited for non-payment of franchise tax, because the application for writ of error contains no assignment presenting such question.