Case ID: f2d_454/html/1173-03.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      PER CURIAM:", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Jack KILLIAN, Individually and for and on Behalf of Jan Killian, a Minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. EYERLY AIRCRAFT COMPANY and Jack Eyerly, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 71-1282
    Summary Calendar.
    
    United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
    Feb. 3, 1972.
    Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
    
      
       Rule 18, 5 Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409.
    
   PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying sanctions under Rule 37(d), F.R.Civ.P. Appellee caused unnecessary matters to be included in the appendix to the extent that four fifths of the cost of producing the appendix is cast upon appellee. Rule 30(b), F.R.A.P. 
      
       See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.