Case ID: f-appx_412/html/0297-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "PER CURIAM.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

In re RICOH COMPANY, LTD. PATENT LITIGATION. Synopsys, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricoh Company, Ltd., Defendant-Appellant. Ricoh Company, Ltd., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Aeroflex Incorporated, AMI Semiconductor, Inc., Matrox Electronic Systems, Ltd., Matrox Graphics, Inc., Matrox International, Inc., Matrox Tech, Inc., and Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 2010-1415.
    United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
    March 8, 2011.
    Rehearing Denied April 22, 2011.
    
      Carter G. Phillips, Sidley Austin, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee and defendants-appellees. With him on the brief for plaintiff-appellee were Richard D. Klingler and Rachel H. Townsend. Also on the brief were Ron E. Shulman, Terrence J.P. Kearney and Richard G. Frenkel, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, of Palo Alto, CA, for plaintiff-ap-pellee and defendants-appellees.
    Gary M. Hoffman, Dickstein Shapiro LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant and plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Kenneth W. Brothers and Eric Oliver.
    Before BRYSON, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges.
   JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.