Case ID: pa-super_28/html/0322-01.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "Morrison, J.,", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

Mould v. Mould
    July 13, 1905:
    (No. 2).
    Argued April 27, 1905.
    Appeal, No. 252, April T., 1905, by A. M. Murdoch, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., March T., 1904, No. 67, sustaining exceptions to auditor’s report in case of Henry S. Mould v. Henry. S. Mould Company.
    Before Rice, P. J., Beaver, 0ready, Porter, Morrison and Henderson, JJ.
    Reversed.
   Opinion by

Morrison, J.,

This is an appeal by A. M. Murdoch from the decree of the lower court and the questions raised are, in principle, precisely like those in Mould v. Mould, ante, p. 818, in which an opinion has this day been filled. And for the reasons therein stated, the assignments of error are sustained and the decree is reversed, and it is now ordered and decreed that the fund be distributed in accordance with the schedule referred to in said opinion ; and it is further ordered and decreed that the appellee pay the costs of this appeal.