Case ID: kan_70/html/0898-02.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "\n      Per Curiam:\n    ", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

M. Rumely Company v. C. F. Wiebke.
    No. 13,948.
    (79 Pac. 1133.)
    Error from Saline district court; Rollin R. Rees, judge.
    Opinion filed February 11, 1905.
    Affirmed.
    Z. F. Jackson and U. C. Tobey, for plaintiff in error.
    
      C. W. Burch, for defendant in error.
   Per Curiam:

The errors complained of in this case are confined exclusively to the sustaining of a motion to suppress certain questions asked by the plaintiff of his witnesses while taking depositions. An examination of these questions satisfies us that the rulings of the court were right.

The judgment is affirmed.