Case ID: nys_35/html/1117-04.html
Source: Caselaw Access Project
Author: {"author": "McCARTHY, J.", "license": "Public Domain", "url": "https://static.case.law/"}
Date Created: 2024-08-24T03:29:51.129683

SHIMM, Respondent, v. EXCHANGE BROADWAY BATH CO., Limited, Appellant.
    (City Court of New York, General Term.
    October 29, 1895.)
    Action by Luther E. Shimm against the Exchange Broadway Bath Company, Limited.
    Kudlich & Finck, for appellant. Brooke & Brooke, for respondent.
   McCARTHY, J.

The issues of fact in this case were properly submitted to the jury, and were clear and favorable to the defendant. The verdict of the jury cannot be disturbed, and, finding no errors, judgment must therefore be affirmed, with costs. All concur.