You need to agree to share your contact information to access this dataset

This repository is publicly accessible, but you have to accept the conditions to access its files and content.

Log in or Sign Up to review the conditions and access this dataset content.

Physics-IQ Verified Dataset

This repository hosts the Physics-IQ Verified benchmark data for evaluating physical understanding in generative video models.

Physics-IQ Verified is derived from the original Physics-IQ benchmark dataset.

Original Physics-IQ

Physics-IQ Verified (Recommended)

We gratefully acknowledge the original Physics-IQ authors for creating and releasing the benchmark.

Relation to the original Physics-IQ dataset

Physics-IQ Verified is not a plain copy of the original Physics-IQ dataset. It is a modified and verified benchmark variant designed to improve the robustness, traceability, and interpretability of the evaluation.

Compared to the original Physics-IQ data, Physics-IQ Verified introduces targeted changes including:

  • refined prompts for ambiguous, incomplete, temporally imprecise, vague, or factually incorrect text descriptions,
  • verified modifications to ground-truth videos and masks where spurious metric activations or visual artifacts could affect evaluation,
  • a sample-level scoring setup aligned with the Physics-IQ Verified evaluation pipeline.

What was refined?

Physics-IQ Verified refines the original benchmark along three axes: prompt quality, artifact removal, and score aggregation.

Across the 198 take-1 benchmark samples, Physics-IQ Verified modifies or refines 57.6% of samples. In particular:

  • 34.8% of prompts were refined because the original text description was ambiguous, incomplete, temporally imprecise, vague, or factually incorrect.
  • 29.8% of videos contained artifacts or spurious metric activations that were not part of the physical phenomenon being evaluated.
  • 20 videos contained both prompt issues and artifact-related modifications.
  • At the frame level, 66.2% of frames contain active physical motion or metric activation, and 27.1% of those active frames were modified to remove artifact-driven activations.

Download

Install the Hugging Face CLI:

pip install -U huggingface_hub

Download the dataset into the folder name expected by the Physics-IQ benchmark code:

hf download Anates-Labs-Research/Physics-IQ-Verified \
  --repo-type dataset \
  --local-dir physics-IQ-benchmark-verified

After download, the local structure should be:

physics-IQ-benchmark-verified/
|-- full-videos/
|-- split-videos/
|-- switch-frames/
`-- video-masks/

Place physics-IQ-benchmark-verified/ in your working directory before running the benchmark.

Usage

Use this dataset with the Physics-IQ Verified benchmark code:

GitHub: Physics-IQ Verified

Physics-IQ Verified is the recommended benchmark variant.

Citation

Please cite both the original Physics-IQ benchmark and Physics-IQ Verified when using this dataset.

Original Physics-IQ

@article{motamed2026physics,
  title={Do generative video models understand physical principles?},
  author={Saman Motamed and Laura Culp and Kevin Swersky and Priyank Jaini and Robert Geirhos},
  booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision},
  pages={948--958},
  year={2026}
}

Physics-IQ Verified

@article{radsch2026verified,
  author  = {Rädsch, Tim and Asano, Yuki M. and Kuehne, Hilde and Bauer, Stefan and Jaini, Priyank and Geirhos, Robert and Lüth, Carsten T.},
  title   = {Physics-IQ Verified},
  journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.18943},
  year    = {2026},
}

License

CC BY 4.0

Brought to you with love from the Anates Labs team.

Downloads last month
34

Paper for Anates-Labs-Research/Physics-IQ-Verified