problem stringlengths 2.47k 9.74k | answer stringclasses 2
values | statement stringlengths 16 397 | chain stringclasses 3
values | chain_label stringclasses 3
values | verdict_sentence stringclasses 6
values | evidence stringlengths 2.07k 9.33k | p_true float64 0 1 | root_gold bool 2
classes | spread bool 2
classes | dataset_name stringclasses 2
values | n_questions int64 1 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STATEMENT: CHAIN A's verdict that R is true is correct.
EVIDENCE:
R: The TV show starring an actor was written by the creator of the radio talk show "The Borowitz Report". This show also starred Joseph Marcell as the butler. The first actor also stars in the 2019 film Aladdin.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is true (its tr... | False | The TV show starring an actor was written by the creator of the radio talk show "The Borowitz Report". This show also starred Joseph Marcell as the butler. The first actor also stars in the 2019 film Aladdin. | s1 | A | CHAIN A's verdict that R is true is correct. | R: The TV show starring an actor was written by the creator of the radio talk show "The Borowitz Report". This show also starred Joseph Marcell as the butler. The first actor also stars in the 2019 film Aladdin.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is true (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.95)
closing rationale: Based on the ... | 0.95 | false | true | hover | 4 |
STATEMENT: CHAIN B's verdict that R is false is correct.
EVIDENCE:
R: The TV show starring an actor was written by the creator of the radio talk show "The Borowitz Report". This show also starred Joseph Marcell as the butler. The first actor also stars in the 2019 film Aladdin.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is true (its t... | True | The TV show starring an actor was written by the creator of the radio talk show "The Borowitz Report". This show also starred Joseph Marcell as the butler. The first actor also stars in the 2019 film Aladdin. | s2 | B | CHAIN B's verdict that R is false is correct. | R: The TV show starring an actor was written by the creator of the radio talk show "The Borowitz Report". This show also starred Joseph Marcell as the butler. The first actor also stars in the 2019 film Aladdin.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is true (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.95)
closing rationale: Based on the ... | 0.2 | false | true | hover | 4 |
STATEMENT: CHAIN C's verdict that R is false is correct.
EVIDENCE:
R: The TV show starring an actor was written by the creator of the radio talk show "The Borowitz Report". This show also starred Joseph Marcell as the butler. The first actor also stars in the 2019 film Aladdin.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is true (its t... | True | The TV show starring an actor was written by the creator of the radio talk show "The Borowitz Report". This show also starred Joseph Marcell as the butler. The first actor also stars in the 2019 film Aladdin. | s3 | C | CHAIN C's verdict that R is false is correct. | R: The TV show starring an actor was written by the creator of the radio talk show "The Borowitz Report". This show also starred Joseph Marcell as the butler. The first actor also stars in the 2019 film Aladdin.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is true (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.95)
closing rationale: Based on the ... | 0.4 | false | true | hover | 4 |
STATEMENT: CHAIN B's verdict that R is true is correct.
EVIDENCE:
R: Erwin S. Barrie managed a company from its founding in September 1922 until he retired in 1975. The works of the artist closely associated with that company are more likely to be seen in an art gallery than the works of Armen Chakmakian.
CHAIN A - i... | False | Erwin S. Barrie managed a company from its founding in September 1922 until he retired in 1975. The works of the artist closely associated with that company are more likely to be seen in an art gallery than the works of Armen Chakmakian. | s1 | B | CHAIN B's verdict that R is true is correct. | R: Erwin S. Barrie managed a company from its founding in September 1922 until he retired in 1975. The works of the artist closely associated with that company are more likely to be seen in an art gallery than the works of Armen Chakmakian.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is true (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.57)
clo... | 0.95 | false | true | hover | 4 |
STATEMENT: CHAIN A's verdict that R is true is correct.
EVIDENCE:
R: Erwin S. Barrie managed a company from its founding in September 1922 until he retired in 1975. The works of the artist closely associated with that company are more likely to be seen in an art gallery than the works of Armen Chakmakian.
CHAIN A - i... | False | Erwin S. Barrie managed a company from its founding in September 1922 until he retired in 1975. The works of the artist closely associated with that company are more likely to be seen in an art gallery than the works of Armen Chakmakian. | s2 | A | CHAIN A's verdict that R is true is correct. | R: Erwin S. Barrie managed a company from its founding in September 1922 until he retired in 1975. The works of the artist closely associated with that company are more likely to be seen in an art gallery than the works of Armen Chakmakian.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is true (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.57)
clo... | 0.57 | false | true | hover | 4 |
STATEMENT: CHAIN C's verdict that R is true is correct.
EVIDENCE:
R: Erwin S. Barrie managed a company from its founding in September 1922 until he retired in 1975. The works of the artist closely associated with that company are more likely to be seen in an art gallery than the works of Armen Chakmakian.
CHAIN A - i... | False | Erwin S. Barrie managed a company from its founding in September 1922 until he retired in 1975. The works of the artist closely associated with that company are more likely to be seen in an art gallery than the works of Armen Chakmakian. | s3 | C | CHAIN C's verdict that R is true is correct. | R: Erwin S. Barrie managed a company from its founding in September 1922 until he retired in 1975. The works of the artist closely associated with that company are more likely to be seen in an art gallery than the works of Armen Chakmakian.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is true (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.57)
clo... | 0.95 | false | true | hover | 4 |
STATEMENT: CHAIN B's verdict that R is false is correct.
EVIDENCE:
R: The commander, in charge of the First Division of the Japanese Second Army at The Port Arthur massacre in China, was a general in the early Imperial Japanese Army which belonged to the Empire of Japan
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is false (its truthful... | False | The commander, in charge of the First Division of the Japanese Second Army at The Port Arthur massacre in China, was a general in the early Imperial Japanese Army which belonged to the Empire of Japan | s1 | B | CHAIN B's verdict that R is false is correct. | R: The commander, in charge of the First Division of the Japanese Second Army at The Port Arthur massacre in China, was a general in the early Imperial Japanese Army which belonged to the Empire of Japan
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is false (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.00)
closing rationale: The "Port Arthur mas... | 0 | true | true | hover | 4 |
STATEMENT: CHAIN C's verdict that R is true is correct.
EVIDENCE:
R: The commander, in charge of the First Division of the Japanese Second Army at The Port Arthur massacre in China, was a general in the early Imperial Japanese Army which belonged to the Empire of Japan
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is false (its truthfuln... | True | The commander, in charge of the First Division of the Japanese Second Army at The Port Arthur massacre in China, was a general in the early Imperial Japanese Army which belonged to the Empire of Japan | s2 | C | CHAIN C's verdict that R is true is correct. | R: The commander, in charge of the First Division of the Japanese Second Army at The Port Arthur massacre in China, was a general in the early Imperial Japanese Army which belonged to the Empire of Japan
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is false (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.00)
closing rationale: The "Port Arthur mas... | 0.98 | true | true | hover | 4 |
STATEMENT: CHAIN A's verdict that R is false is correct.
EVIDENCE:
R: The commander, in charge of the First Division of the Japanese Second Army at The Port Arthur massacre in China, was a general in the early Imperial Japanese Army which belonged to the Empire of Japan
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is false (its truthful... | False | The commander, in charge of the First Division of the Japanese Second Army at The Port Arthur massacre in China, was a general in the early Imperial Japanese Army which belonged to the Empire of Japan | s3 | A | CHAIN A's verdict that R is false is correct. | R: The commander, in charge of the First Division of the Japanese Second Army at The Port Arthur massacre in China, was a general in the early Imperial Japanese Army which belonged to the Empire of Japan
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is false (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.00)
closing rationale: The "Port Arthur mas... | 0 | true | true | hover | 4 |
STATEMENT: CHAIN A's verdict that R is false is correct.
EVIDENCE:
R: A battle came before the fight where Agat Invasion Beach was a landing site. Hoffman Farm was used as a hospital and airfield during this battle.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is false (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.00)
closing rationale: The sta... | True | A battle came before the fight where Agat Invasion Beach was a landing site. Hoffman Farm was used as a hospital and airfield during this battle. | s1 | A | CHAIN A's verdict that R is false is correct. | R: A battle came before the fight where Agat Invasion Beach was a landing site. Hoffman Farm was used as a hospital and airfield during this battle.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is false (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.00)
closing rationale: The statement claims that a battle preceding the one where **Agat Invasion ... | 0 | false | true | hover | 5 |
STATEMENT: CHAIN C's verdict that R is false is correct.
EVIDENCE:
R: A battle came before the fight where Agat Invasion Beach was a landing site. Hoffman Farm was used as a hospital and airfield during this battle.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is false (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.00)
closing rationale: The sta... | True | A battle came before the fight where Agat Invasion Beach was a landing site. Hoffman Farm was used as a hospital and airfield during this battle. | s2 | C | CHAIN C's verdict that R is false is correct. | R: A battle came before the fight where Agat Invasion Beach was a landing site. Hoffman Farm was used as a hospital and airfield during this battle.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is false (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.00)
closing rationale: The statement claims that a battle preceding the one where **Agat Invasion ... | 0.1 | false | true | hover | 5 |
STATEMENT: CHAIN B's verdict that R is true is correct.
EVIDENCE:
R: A battle came before the fight where Agat Invasion Beach was a landing site. Hoffman Farm was used as a hospital and airfield during this battle.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is false (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.00)
closing rationale: The stat... | False | A battle came before the fight where Agat Invasion Beach was a landing site. Hoffman Farm was used as a hospital and airfield during this battle. | s3 | B | CHAIN B's verdict that R is true is correct. | R: A battle came before the fight where Agat Invasion Beach was a landing site. Hoffman Farm was used as a hospital and airfield during this battle.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is false (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.00)
closing rationale: The statement claims that a battle preceding the one where **Agat Invasion ... | 0.7 | false | true | hover | 5 |
STATEMENT: CHAIN A's verdict that R is false is correct.
EVIDENCE:
R: Paola Suarez was not a higher ranked tennis player than the partner of US Open mixed doubles finalist Chan Hao-ching.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is false (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.05)
closing rationale: According to retrieved evidence, Ch... | True | Paola Suarez was not a higher ranked tennis player than the partner of US Open mixed doubles finalist Chan Hao-ching. | s1 | A | CHAIN A's verdict that R is false is correct. | R: Paola Suarez was not a higher ranked tennis player than the partner of US Open mixed doubles finalist Chan Hao-ching.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is false (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.05)
closing rationale: According to retrieved evidence, Chan Hao-ching reached the 2017 US Open mixed doubles final partnering... | 0.05 | false | true | hover | 4 |
STATEMENT: CHAIN C's verdict that R is false is correct.
EVIDENCE:
R: Paola Suarez was not a higher ranked tennis player than the partner of US Open mixed doubles finalist Chan Hao-ching.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is false (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.05)
closing rationale: According to retrieved evidence, Ch... | True | Paola Suarez was not a higher ranked tennis player than the partner of US Open mixed doubles finalist Chan Hao-ching. | s2 | C | CHAIN C's verdict that R is false is correct. | R: Paola Suarez was not a higher ranked tennis player than the partner of US Open mixed doubles finalist Chan Hao-ching.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is false (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.05)
closing rationale: According to retrieved evidence, Chan Hao-ching reached the 2017 US Open mixed doubles final partnering... | 0.05 | false | true | hover | 4 |
STATEMENT: CHAIN B's verdict that R is true is correct.
EVIDENCE:
R: Paola Suarez was not a higher ranked tennis player than the partner of US Open mixed doubles finalist Chan Hao-ching.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is false (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.05)
closing rationale: According to retrieved evidence, Cha... | False | Paola Suarez was not a higher ranked tennis player than the partner of US Open mixed doubles finalist Chan Hao-ching. | s3 | B | CHAIN B's verdict that R is true is correct. | R: Paola Suarez was not a higher ranked tennis player than the partner of US Open mixed doubles finalist Chan Hao-ching.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is false (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.05)
closing rationale: According to retrieved evidence, Chan Hao-ching reached the 2017 US Open mixed doubles final partnering... | 0.95 | false | true | hover | 4 |
STATEMENT: CHAIN A's verdict that R is false is correct.
EVIDENCE:
R: Russell Crowe starred in a 1992 film and gained cult success. It was directed by the director of the film Australian newcomer Natalie Ramsey starred in.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is false (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.05)
closing rationale: ... | True | Russell Crowe starred in a 1992 film and gained cult success. It was directed by the director of the film Australian newcomer Natalie Ramsey starred in. | s1 | A | CHAIN A's verdict that R is false is correct. | R: Russell Crowe starred in a 1992 film and gained cult success. It was directed by the director of the film Australian newcomer Natalie Ramsey starred in.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is false (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.05)
closing rationale: The statement asserts a connection between Russell Crowe's 1992 film... | 0.05 | false | true | hover | 4 |
STATEMENT: CHAIN B's verdict that R is false is correct.
EVIDENCE:
R: Russell Crowe starred in a 1992 film and gained cult success. It was directed by the director of the film Australian newcomer Natalie Ramsey starred in.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is false (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.05)
closing rationale: ... | True | Russell Crowe starred in a 1992 film and gained cult success. It was directed by the director of the film Australian newcomer Natalie Ramsey starred in. | s2 | B | CHAIN B's verdict that R is false is correct. | R: Russell Crowe starred in a 1992 film and gained cult success. It was directed by the director of the film Australian newcomer Natalie Ramsey starred in.
CHAIN A - its verdict: R is false (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.05)
closing rationale: The statement asserts a connection between Russell Crowe's 1992 film... | 0.05 | false | true | hover | 4 |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
RLCR credibility dataset (v3-cred)
Training rows for scoring whether one ReCCon chain's verdict on a statement is correct. Built 2026-11-01 from new HoVer and FactCHD pipeline runs. IFQA is held out (string overlap 0) and is not in this dataset.
Each row is one chain of one statement. answer is True iff that chain's verdict (p_true >= 0.5) matches the statement gold. The problem column is the RLCR evidence prompt: the statement to score is CHAIN X's verdict that R is {true|false} is correct. Evidence is the shared stage-5 context (all three verdicts, closing rationales, verification questions). The numeric chain estimate (its truthfulness estimate for R: 0.NN) is included. The same statement's three rows stay in one split.
| split | rows | statements | P(answer=True) | spread rows |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| train | 1893 | 631 | 0.577 | 1410 |
| validation | 234 | 78 | 0.543 | 165 |
| test | 240 | 80 | 0.596 | 201 |
Spread rows are statements whose three p_true values differ by more than 0.25. Non-spread rows are included at most one per three spread rows. Seed 43.
Load the parquet files:
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("Alexps9yyy/rlcr-credibility-dataset", data_dir="hf_files")
- Downloads last month
- 82