judgement stringlengths 1.41k 967k | summary stringlengths 153 158k ⌀ |
|---|---|
<s>[INST] Civil Appeal No. 483 of 1958.
Appeal by special leave from the decision dated March 20, 1956, of the Labour Appellate Tribunal of India, Madras, in Appeal No. Bom.
90 of 1952 arising 145 out of the Award dated December 28, 1951, of the Industrial Tribunal, Madras, in Industrial Dispute No. 48 of 1951.
Februar... | The management by a notice terminated the services Of 39 workmen as a measure of retrenchment.
The workmen went on strike which led to an industrial dispute.
The Industrial Tribunal interalia held that the strike was not justified and that the management had made out of a case of necessity for retrenchment and no malaf... |
<s>[INST] Appeal No. 77 of 1952.
Appeal from the Judgment and Order dated the 9th January, 1951, of the High Court of Judicature at Calcutta (Harries C. J. and Banerjee J.) in its Special Jurisdiction (Income tax) in Income tax Reference No. 70 of 1950.
C. K. Daphtary, Solicitor General for India (Porus A. Mehta, with ... | For purposes of assessment to income tax, a firm is a different entity distinct from its partners, and a mere change in the constitution of the firm does not bring into existence a new assessable unit or a distinct assessable entity.
(1) 67 I.A. 464,481.
172 A firm consisting of three partners, A, B and C, carried on t... |
<s>[INST] Appeal No. 490 of 1957.
Appeal from the judgment and decree dated March 22,1954, of the Allahabad High Court in Civil Misc.
Writ No. 7854 of 1951.
G. section Pathak, section N. Andley, J. B. Dadachanji, Rameshwar Nath and P. L. Vohra, for the appellant.
C. B. Agarwala, G. C Mathur and C. P. Lal, for responden... | There were certain charges of immorality, corruption and gross dereliction of duty against the appellant who was a police officer.
After an enquiry, the Governor of U. P. referred the case under section 4 Of the U. P. Disciplinary Proceedings (Administrative Tribunal) Rules, 1947, to a Tribunal.
The Tribunal recommende... |
<s>[INST] ivil Appeal No. 3566 of 1989.
712 From the Judgment and Order dated 17.2.1989 of the Gauhati High Court in F.A. No. 7 of 1972.
K.N. Bhatt, H.N. Salve, A.K. Sil and G. Joshi for the Appel lant.
section Parekh for the Respondent.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by K. JAGANNATHA SHETT, J.
The question of... | The respondent, who was indenting and lifting goods from textile mills situated in different places, and was main taining a current account with the appellant Bank for this purpose, filed a suit against the Bank for accounts, dam ages, compensation and delivery of goods or their equivalent in money, for non delivery of... |
<s>[INST] minal Appeal No. 48 of 1958.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated July 4, 1956, of the Calcutta High Court, 321 in Criminal Revision No. 1005 of 1955 arising out of the judgment and order dated July 21, 1955, of the Additional Sessions Judge, Asansol, in Criminal Appeal No. 125 of 1955.
H... | A company dismissed from its service four of the appellants, for taking part and instigating others to join, in an illegal slowdown strike in the Hot Mill Section of its works, which were a public utility service.
On such dismissal the slow down strike however gained strength.
The company thereupon issued a notice date... |
"<s>[INST] Appeals Nos. 489 & 490 of 1961.\nAppeals by special leave from the award dated March 16, (...TRUNCATED) | "The Chief Commissioner, Delhi, referred an industrial dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tr(...TRUNCATED) |
"<s>[INST] Appeals Nos.\n1038 1040 of 1967.\nAppeals by certificate under Article 133 of the Constit(...TRUNCATED) | "The appellant mortgagor tendered to the mortgagees the mortgage money due on their mortgages and, o(...TRUNCATED) |
"<s>[INST] Appeal No. 301 of 1961.\nAppeal from the judgment and order dated March 10, 1960, of the (...TRUNCATED) | "The respondent was appointed a Naib Tehsildar under the appellant, in the year 1937.\nOn August 4, (...TRUNCATED) |
"<s>[INST] Criminal Appeal No. 533 of 1989.\nFrom the Judgment and Order dated 31.8.88 of the Bombay(...TRUNCATED) | "The appellant is a foreign national.\nAt Colva, on seeing a police party on patrol he accelerated t(...TRUNCATED) |
"<s>[INST] ition (Criminal) No.668 of 1986.\n(Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India).\nR.K. (...TRUNCATED) | "The petitioner, aged about 18 years, was convicted for an offence u/s 302/34 I.P.C. and sentenced t(...TRUNCATED) |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 11