Model appears to be Omnivoice's work

#5
by therysin - opened

This model appears to be OmniVoice’s 612.6M-parameter base plus a 101.8M adapter, with no current provenance explanation.

Can you explain? Especially no credit to Omnivoice?

therysin changed discussion title from Please explain how this is derived from Omnivoice and how the license can be Apache 2.0 when Omnivoice pretrained weights are non commercial. to Model appears to be Omnivoice's work (which is not Apache 2)
therysin changed discussion title from Model appears to be Omnivoice's work (which is not Apache 2) to Model appears to be Omnivoice's work

Sign up or log in to comment