DigiMind: A Modular Cognitive Architecture for Continual Learning and Factual Coherence

Status: Preliminary Draft (November 2025)
Author: Chaiya Tantisukarom (Independent Researcher)
Contact: drchaiya@gmail.com


πŸ“– Overview

DigiMind is a proposed unified theoretical and architectural framework designed to address the fundamental limitations of modern monolithic Large Language Models (LLMs): Catastrophic Forgetting, Super-linear Computational Costs, and Factual Incoherence (Hallucination).

The framework re-imagines the cognitive process as a computational Analog-to-Digital Conversion (ADC) problem. By replacing the monolithic model with a hierarchical Hard-Switch Mixture-of-Experts (H-MoE), DigiMind creates a blueprint for sustainable Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) capable of:

  1. Continual Learning: Learning new tasks without degrading previous knowledge.
  2. Sparse Computation: Massive reduction in energy and latency per inference.
  3. Factual Stability: Decoupling procedural "know-how" from epistemic "know-that."

🧠 The "Crisis of Monolithic Memory"

Current Transformer architectures face three critical bottlenecks that DigiMind aims to solve:

  1. Catastrophic Forgetting: Sequential training overwrites previous weights (the plasticity-stability dilemma).
  2. Computational Inefficiency: Every query activates 100% of parameters ($\mathbf{P}_{\text{Total}}$).
  3. Generative Error: Retrieval is probabilistic, lacking a grounded "truth" mechanism.

βš™οΈ Architecture: The ADC/DAC Framework

DigiMind splits the cognitive workload into two distinct phases: ADC (We Learn/Route) and DAC (We Talk).

1. ADC: The Router ($\mathbf{R}$) & Semantic Index

  • The Router: A fixed-size Gating Transformer that performs "quantization." It maps continuous input embeddings to a precise Digital Address ($\mathbf{A}$). It uses Hierarchical Contrastive Loss ($\mathcal{L}_{\text{HCL}}$) to enforce high-margin separation between concepts.
  • Semantic Index (SI): A non-volatile, vector-based lookup table for Epistemic Memory (facts).
    • Feature: Factual Override. If the SI returns a high-confidence match ($\mathbf{A}_{\text{gold}}$), the neural routing is overridden, eliminating hallucination.
    • Validation: Connected to Stack.AI, a conceptual external loop where human reviewers validate facts before they are committed to memory.

2. Specialist Modules ($\mathbf{M}_i$)

  • Decoupled, independent neural networks holding Procedural Knowledge.
  • Activated via Hard-Switch: Non-selected modules consume zero compute.
  • Updated via Localized PEFT, ensuring no interference with other knowledge domains.

3. DAC: The Synthesis Decoder ($\mathbf{D}_{\text{synth}}$)

  • A dedicated, medium-weight Multimodal LLM (1B–5B parameters).
  • Role: A knowledge-agnostic "Syntactic Engine." Its base weights are permanently frozen.
  • Mechanism: Fuses the sparse outputs ($O_i$) from experts with the original context using Multi-Head Cross-Attention (MHXA) to generate coherent, stylistically fluid output.

πŸ”¬ Key Theoretical Concepts

Knowledge Entropy ($\mathcal{H}_{\text{K}}$)

A formal metric quantifying the relational complexity and conceptual overlap of a domain. It determines the optimal bit-depth required to resolve ambiguity.

HK,j=βˆ’log⁑2(min⁑c,k∈Cj,cβ‰ k(βˆ₯ccβˆ’ckβˆ₯2+δσj)) \mathcal{H}_{\text{K}, j} = - \log_2 \left( \min_{c, k \in C_j, c \neq k} \left( \frac{\| \mathbf{c}_{c} - \mathbf{c}_{k} \|_2 + \delta}{\sigma_j} \right) \right)

Granular Evolution

The architecture is not static. It utilizes Vertical Flexibility to dynamically adapt its structure:

  • Split Operation: If a module's $\mathcal{H}_{\text{K}}$ exceeds a threshold, it splits into a new router and sub-modules.
  • Result: The system grows its depth ($D$) and bit-resolution ($B$) only where complexity demands it.

Hierarchical Contrastive Loss ($\mathcal{L}_{\text{HCL}}$)

Unlike standard Load Balancing losses, $\mathcal{L}_{\text{HCL}}$ actively forces conceptual clusters apart in the embedding space to ensure strict path sparsity.


πŸ“‰ Economic Analysis & Efficiency

DigiMind shifts the paradigm from parameter count to architectural complexity.

Simulated Cost-Savings per Inference: Comparison of a 220B Monolithic Baseline vs. a 227B DigiMind System (distributed across $N=1000$ modules).

Model Component Total Parameters Active Parameters Active Ratio
LLM Monolithic 220B 220B 100%
DigiMind Router ($\mathbf{R}$) 2B 2B 0.9%
DigiMind Modules ($k=2$) 220B 0.44B 0.2%
Synthesis Decoder ($\mathbf{D}_{\text{synth}}$) 5B 5B 2.3%
DigiMind Total 227B 7.44B 3.4%

Result: A projected 30x to 60x reduction in computational cost/latency per inference.


πŸ“š Terminology

Term Definition
Epistemic Memory Non-volatile facts stored in the Semantic Index (SI).
Router ($\mathbf{R}$) The Gating Transformer that maps input to a Digital Address ($\mathbf{A}$).
Digital Address ($\mathbf{A}$) The sparse binary string used as a hard-coded activation mask.
Vertical Flexibility Allowing bit resolution and layer depth to vary by schema complexity.
$\mathbf{D}_{\text{synth}}$ The Synthesis Decoder; a frozen-weight syntactic fusion engine.
Stack.AI External Epistemic Validation loop with human-in-the-loop verification.

βš–οΈ License & Citation

This work is currently a preliminary draft made available as an open idea.

Citation:

Tantisukarom, C. (2025). DigiMind: A Modular Cognitive Architecture for Continual Learning and Factual Coherence. Preliminary Draft.

Downloads last month

-

Downloads are not tracked for this model. How to track
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. πŸ™‹ Ask for provider support