You need to agree to share your contact information to access this model

This repository is publicly accessible, but you have to accept the conditions to access its files and content.

Log in or Sign Up to review the conditions and access this model content.

YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card

Check out the documentation for more information.

ParentDopingFlowFinal Checkpoints

This repository stages the checkpoints and benchmark tables selected for external release.

Start here

Read PROJECT_STATUS.md first. It is the single current overview: scope, all three boards, contributions, limits and remaining work.

Use checkpoints/joint_v2_parentgroup_frozen_ep300.pt. It is trained with a parent-grouped split, so no parent compound appears on both sides of the holdout.

What this delivers

Given a parent structure and a set of candidate doping edits: pick the optimal concentration (mean optimal-x error 0.0122; 0.0135 on an unseen family), pick the best edit (regret 3.20 K, about half of random), and construct the chosen edit into a full structure with site occupancies (100% composition validity on oxides against a 99.6% real-data control).

What it does not deliver

Proposing edits absent from the dataset. Three independent routes fail: the CSP trunk copies atom types verbatim so the flow cannot generate composition; a learned proposer has 155 training examples over 35 parents against ~930 classes; and 88.6% of enumerated proposals have no known Tc, so they cannot be scored at all. See PROJECT_STATUS.md section 5.

Three things that are easy to misread

  1. The dome metric fluctuates by up to 0.029 rho between epochs of the same run, so smaller differences are not real.
  2. rho and top-1 already sit at the label-noise limit; only regret has headroom, and 89% of it is on parents whose best edit is multi-channel.
  3. Under a protocol that permits memorisation a random forest on composition reaches rho 0.776 against this model's 0.745. It is nearest-neighbour retrieval (r=0.987), and on a held-out family it collapses to -0.142 while this model holds 0.839. Always quote the cross-family number alongside.

A finetune must set atom_type_manifold=null_manifold to match the pretrain. Mismatching it silently collapses the doping-axis metric from 0.730 to 0.229 while the training curves still look healthy.

Files marked SUPERSEDED are the July release, measured on a split where 91.7% of the benchmark cases were training data; they are kept only for reproducibility.

Included artifacts

File Role Notes
PROJECT_STATUS.md project_status_entry_point START HERE. Scope, all three boards, contributions, limits, artifacts.
checkpoints/joint_v2_propose_v1_ep300.pt propose_mode_experiment_checkpoint Trained with --mark_identity_condition and a learnable propose token to let generation choose the edit itself. The token did learn (norm 0.71) but behaviour is unchanged, because the CSP trunk copies atom types verbatim and cannot generate composition. Kept as the negative result.
benchmark/composition_baselines_leaky.json composition_baselines_leaky RF/SVR/Ridge on composition only. Under the memorisation-permitting protocol RF reaches rho 0.776 vs the flow model's 0.745; it must be reported alongside the cross-family result below.
benchmark/composition_baselines_cross_family.json composition_baselines_cross_family With cuprate_Y123 removed from baseline training, RF/SVR/Ridge score rho -0.142 / 0.054 / -0.005 on the 89 held-out Y123 series against the flow model's 0.839. RF is nearest-neighbour retrieval (r=0.987 vs its nearest training formula's Tc), so it has nothing to retrieve here.
benchmark/composition_validity.json composition_validity Charge-neutrality validity, oxides only. Conditioned construction 100%, real-data control 99.6%, unconditioned generation 66.7%. The criterion is a false negative for the intermetallic families.
benchmark/rf_vs_flow_scorer.json rf_vs_flow_scorer Same candidate pool, two scorers. RF picks the right channel slightly more often, which shows the discovery board cannot separate discovery from retrieval rather than that RF is better at discovery.
benchmark/de_novo_proposal.json de_novo_proposal Unconditioned generation returns the parent unchanged for 5 of 6 parents; the one exception is chemically impossible (O5Ba1Pb1).
benchmark/enumerate_construct_score.json enumerate_construct_score Enumerate, construct, score. 88.6% of top picks are edits absent from the data and therefore unscoreable: only 4 of 35 parents yield a regret.
benchmark/alignment_tolerance_ladder.json alignment_coverage_limit_ladder Why board B covers only 30 parents. Loose tolerances rescue 98% at the fit stage but those correspondences carry median 0.354 fractional drift.
benchmark/regret_attribution.json regret_attribution 20 of 30 parents are solved exactly; multi-channel optima carry 89% of the remaining regret.
benchmark/channel_synergy.json channel_synergy With the primary channel fixed, true delta Tc still spans 13.59 K and the per-group
benchmark/ranking_ep300_mc2.json ranking_board_ep300 Board B for all three splits plus four trivial baselines, all at epoch 300.
checkpoints/joint_v2_parentgroup_frozen_ep300.pt delivery_checkpoint_leakage_free Primary delivery checkpoint. Frozen backbone, parent-grouped split (0% parent overlap between train and val), epoch 300. Dome benchmark rho 0.745 / peak_x_err 0.0122 / regret 1.32 K.
checkpoints/joint_v2_familyholdout_y123_ep300.pt cross_family_checkpoint Cross-family run: every cuprate_Y123 doping pair held out of training. Scores rho 0.839 on the 89 held-out Y123 series vs 0.840 for the model trained on them.
checkpoints/joint_v2_pairrow_frozen_ep300.pt leaky_split_reference_checkpoint Same recipe on the historical pair-row split, kept as the leakage reference: rho 0.742 vs 0.745, i.e. removing leakage costs nothing.
checkpoints/structure_csp_all_tcfix_v2_best_tc.pt structure_pretrain_warm_start CSP-conditioned pretrain all three runs warm-start from. Trained with atom_type_manifold=null_manifold; a finetune must match that or the doping-axis metric collapses from 0.730 to 0.229.
metadata/joint_v2_parentgroup_split_summary.json parentgroup_split_summary Parent-grouped split, 0% parent overlap.
metadata/joint_v2_familyholdout_split_summary.json familyholdout_split_summary Family holdout split; val contains only cuprate_Y123.
benchmark/DELIVERABLE_BENCHMARK_AND_CONTRIBUTIONS_20260812.md current_deliverable Current benchmark definitions, results and contributions. Start here.
benchmark/MEASUREMENT_FIXES_AND_NEXT_ACTIONS_20260807.md measurement_investigation_log Full investigation log, including every retracted conclusion.
benchmark/dome_parentgroup_ep300_summary.json dome_benchmark_summary Benchmark A result for the delivery checkpoint (213 series).
benchmark/ranking_ep300_mc2.json ranking_benchmark_summary Benchmark B for all three splits plus four trivial baselines.
benchmark/label_noise_floor.json label_noise_floor Label-noise floor. rho 0.745 and top-1 0.700 match a perfect estimator limited by ~2 K label noise, so those metrics are already at the label resolution limit.
benchmark/channel_synergy.json channel_synergy_ablation Multi-channel synergy: with the primary channel fixed, true delta Tc still spans 13.59 K and the per-group
benchmark/regret_attribution.json regret_attribution 20 of 30 parents are solved exactly; multi-channel optima carry 89% of the remaining regret.
benchmark/alignment_tolerance_ladder.json alignment_coverage_limit Why benchmark B covers only 30 parents: loose tolerances rescue 98% at the fit stage, but those correspondences carry median 0.354 fractional drift and are correctly rejected.
checkpoints/joint_v2_hardfam_preserve_best_tc.pt main_guided_replay_checkpoint SUPERSEDED (2026-08-13): measured on a leaky split. Kept for reproducibility.
checkpoints/joint_v2_with_others_best_tc.pt baseline_checkpoint Main baseline for guided replay comparison.
checkpoints/joint_v2_hardfam_v1_best.pt hardfam_ablation_checkpoint Hard-family weighted ablation checkpoint.
checkpoints/structure_csp_no_others_last.pt structure_pretrain_checkpoint Optional structure pretrain initialization checkpoint.
metadata/joint_v2_hardfam_preserve_pair_row_split_summary.json preserve_split_summary Train/val split summary for the preserve run.
metadata/joint_v2_hardfam_v1_pair_row_split_summary.json hardfam_v1_split_summary Train/val split summary for the hardfam v1 run.
metadata/joint_v2_with_others_pair_row_split_summary.json baseline_split_summary Train/val split summary for the baseline run.
benchmark/FINAL_BENCHMARK_TABLE_20260805.md final_benchmark_markdown SUPERSEDED (2026-08-13): all numbers are training-set scores. See DELIVERABLE_*.md.
benchmark/overall.csv overall_benchmark_csv Overall benchmark table in CSV.
benchmark/by_family.csv family_benchmark_csv Per-family benchmark table in CSV.

Recommended checkpoint

  • Primary guided replay checkpoint: checkpoints/joint_v2_hardfam_preserve_best_tc.pt
  • Baseline reference: checkpoints/joint_v2_with_others_best_tc.pt
  • Hard-family ablation: checkpoints/joint_v2_hardfam_v1_best.pt

Benchmark

See benchmark/FINAL_BENCHMARK_TABLE_20260805.md and the CSV tables under benchmark/.

Downloads last month

-

Downloads are not tracked for this model. How to track
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. 🙋 Ask for provider support