You need to agree to share your contact information to access this model

This repository is publicly accessible, but you have to accept the conditions to access its files and content.

Log in or Sign Up to review the conditions and access this model content.

Gemma-4-E4B-it β€” Tajik adaptation (CPT β†’ SFT β†’ tool-calling)

Saidzoda Lab. One model line, trained 2026-09-22 β†’ 2026-09-25 on 6Γ—H100. Base: google/gemma-4-E4B-it. Adapters are LoRA; only the final tool-calling stage is published as a full merged model.

Contents

path what size format
cpt-lora/ stage 1 β€” Tajik continual pretraining 3.33 GB LoRA adapter (r64, Ξ±64, rslora; embed_tokens+lm_head trained)
sft-lora/ stage 2 β€” Tajik supervised fine-tune 325 MB LoRA adapter (r32)
tool-full/ stage 3 β€” tool-calling, full merged model 15 GB safetensors

Each LoRA applies to the output of the previous stage, not to the stock base: base β†’ cpt-lora β†’ (merge) β†’ sft-lora β†’ (merge) β†’ tool-full. So sft-lora is not loadable on stock E4B β€” it expects the CPT-merged model.

Measured results

Frozen benches, method = log-likelihood, identical across every row so the deltas are comparable. Full sets (no subsampling).

stage belebele-tgk (900) tajik-curated (657)
stock gemma-4-E4B-it 37.8% (340) 28.3% (186)
+ CPT 63.8% (574) 44.9% (295)
+ SFT 72.1% (649) 53.4% (351)
+ tool (this repo's full model) 72.6% (653) 53.7% (353)

belebele 37.8 β†’ 72.6 (+34.8 pp), curated 28.3 β†’ 53.7 (+25.4 pp). CPT alone contributes +26.0 / +16.6 β€” the largest single step, because stock E4B is not competent in Tajik (37.8% against a 25% chance floor on a 4-choice benchmark).

Read before using the numbers

  • These are log-likelihood scores. They are not comparable to chat/generative-mode scores, and LL generally understates an instruction-tuned model's practical performance.
  • The CPT stage ran 1.5 of 2 planned epochs (stopped at step 26,500/35,332 by owner decision, mid-cosine at 16% of peak LR). It is not an annealed endpoint. Loss was still improving when stopped.
  • The tool-calling stage adds +0.5/+0.3 on these MCQ benchmarks, which is inside noise β€” it targets tool-call formatting, not knowledge, so these benches are not the right measure of it.
  • No GRPO stage. GRPO fails on E4B with ValueError: Target module Gemma4ClippableLinear(...) is not supported β€” PEFT cannot wrap E4B's non-nn.Linear wrapper modules. Unresolved at publication.

Training

stage data steps seq LR schedule
CPT Tajik text corpus 26,500 / 35,332 2048 packed 5e-5 cosine
SFT Tajik instruction set (1,112,888 rows) 37,097 (2 ep) 1024 1e-5 cosine
tool tool-call set (176,522 rows) 2,705 (1 ep) 1024 2e-5 cosine

Global batch 60 on all stages (6-GPU DDP). bf16, max_grad_norm 0.5.

Gated (manual) β€” access on request.

Downloads last month

-

Downloads are not tracked for this model. How to track
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. πŸ™‹ Ask for provider support

Model tree for Tohirju/sl-ivory

Adapter
(357)
this model