can you explain why you reposted my quants? lol
im noticing a weird trend where multiple different accounts have now cloned my repo. you at least didnt change the credits at the bottom which i can appreciate but this does take away from any download counts i have. if anything in the future were to happen where huggingface funds creators like me, this would ultimate take money from my account.
if your intention is to keep it in case i deleted mine, id recommend just making it private. otherwise, i genuinely dont know why you have this up on your page.
im noticing a weird trend where multiple different accounts have now cloned my repo. you at least didnt change the credits at the bottom which i can appreciate but this does take away from any download counts i have. if anything in the future were to happen where huggingface funds creators like me, this would ultimate take money from my account.
if your intention is to keep it in case i deleted mine, id recommend just making it private. otherwise, i genuinely dont know why you have this up on your page.
Dude, I understand wanting attrib, but this just isn’t really how Hugging Face or community model work functions... The TOS you agreed to here grants all of us “perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license” to use, publish, reproduce, distribute, and make derivative works of content through Hugging Face’s services.
The W4A8/INT8/ConvRot tooling also comes from the wider community ecosystem, and it could be questioned creating a container that represents the same weights is even a derivative to add clauses too, as it's just container format to opening the weights systems expect.
Dude, I understand wanting attrib, but this just isn’t really how Hugging Face or community model work functions... The TOS you agreed to here grants all of us “perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license” to use, publish, reproduce, distribute, and make derivative works of content through Hugging Face’s services.
The W4A8/INT8/ConvRot tooling also comes from the wider community ecosystem, and it could be questioned creating a container that represents the same weights is even a derivative to add clauses too, as it's just container format to opening the weights systems expect.
now see heres the issue here. theres a difference between reuploading something and reformatting. this is just blatant copy, paste brother lol applicable licensing or not. i get what your saying but this is bad practice regardless. i could be paywalling my shiii on a personal website and alot of the community would be twiddling their thumbs without it. i think this whole " you gave it away, whatd you expect" narrative is a little goofy when someones just reuploading shiii they never touched. thats just strange imo.
whats one viable reason to do so???
Dude, I understand wanting attrib, but this just isn’t really how Hugging Face or community model work functions... The TOS you agreed to here grants all of us “perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license” to use, publish, reproduce, distribute, and make derivative works of content through Hugging Face’s services.
The W4A8/INT8/ConvRot tooling also comes from the wider community ecosystem, and it could be questioned creating a container that represents the same weights is even a derivative to add clauses too, as it's just container format to opening the weights systems expect.
now see heres the issue here. theres a difference between reuploading something and reformatting. this is just blatant copy, paste brother lol applicable licensing or not. i get what your saying but this is bad practice regardless. i could be paywalling my shiii on a personal website and alot of the community would be twiddling their thumbs without it. i think this whole " you gave it away, whatd you expect" narrative is a little goofy when someones just reuploading shiii they never touched. thats just strange imo.
whats one viable reason to do so???
I think what you didn't get from my last post, is this is common practice, not bad practice. I don't get where you are coming from. Its like you aren't a developer or model research or how things work in these OSS communities and platforms. This whole platforms mission is the democratization of AI and here you are... You are acting like and elite expert bro trying to guard against community access and practices
I think what you didn't get from my last post, is this is common practice, not bad practice. I don't get where you are coming from. Its like you aren't a developer or model research or how things work in these OSS communities and platforms. This whole platforms mission is the democratization of AI and here you are... You are acting like and elite expert bro trying to guard against community access and practices
Listen, i get you think with the capital part of your brain but i do.
One day, hosting sites like this will pay creators for their work. Quantization, reformatting, etc. Its work regardless of what you say and i genuinely couldnt care less about how you feel about it.
And ive done my part for contribution. You should really check my resume. Ive integrated over 40 models into comfy MYSELF. Hours of work, just claimed by other creators like this guy
And you STILL cant provide a single reason why this is a viable decision to make. Theres literally no point in reuploading the same repo to his own. It waste compute, server space, and also falsely claims my work as his.
provide 1 valid excuse as to why 👋😂
Because with your logic, buddy should be using my profile pic and handle then at this point. Very strange.
I think what you didn't get from my last post, is this is common practice, not bad practice. I don't get where you are coming from. Its like you aren't a developer or model research or how things work in these OSS communities and platforms. This whole platforms mission is the democratization of AI and here you are... You are acting like and elite expert bro trying to guard against community access and practices
Listen, i get you think with the capital part of your brain but i do.
One day, hosting sites like this will pay creators for their work. Quantization, reformatting, etc. Its work regardless of what you say and i genuinely couldnt care less about how you feel about it.
And ive done my part for contribution. You should really check my resume. Ive integrated over 40 models into comfy MYSELF. Hours of work, just claimed by other creators like this guy
And you STILL cant provide a single reason why this is a viable decision to make. Theres literally no point in reuploading the same repo to his own. It waste compute, server space, and also falsely claims my work as his.
provide 1 valid excuse as to why 👋😂
Because with your logic, buddy should be using my profile pic and handle then at this point. Very strange.
I probably have more forks than you by a long shot, and like the rest of us... we don't care. What should I go after drltdata? Lol "You owe me 1.7 million downloads! I should be at 3 million downloads, not 1.3 million!" This isn't how these communities, or any of this operates. You're alone on this one.
I think what you didn't get from my last post, is this is common practice, not bad practice. I don't get where you are coming from. Its like you aren't a developer or model research or how things work in these OSS communities and platforms. This whole platforms mission is the democratization of AI and here you are... You are acting like and elite expert bro trying to guard against community access and practices
Listen, i get you think with the capital part of your brain but i do.
One day, hosting sites like this will pay creators for their work. Quantization, reformatting, etc. Its work regardless of what you say and i genuinely couldnt care less about how you feel about it.
And ive done my part for contribution. You should really check my resume. Ive integrated over 40 models into comfy MYSELF. Hours of work, just claimed by other creators like this guy
And you STILL cant provide a single reason why this is a viable decision to make. Theres literally no point in reuploading the same repo to his own. It waste compute, server space, and also falsely claims my work as his.
provide 1 valid excuse as to why 👋😂
Because with your logic, buddy should be using my profile pic and handle then at this point. Very strange.
I probably have more forks than you by a long shot, and like the rest of us... we don't care. What should I go after drltdata? Lol "You owe me 1.7 million downloads! I should be at 3 million downloads, not 1.3 million!" This isn't how these communities, or any of this operates. You're alone on this one.
I could care less about your perspective. Youll see in due time. Ill get mine and hell get removed. Id also like to point out that you have such a weakminded stance on it. You choose not to capitalize on your work. I choose to. And when were given any type of revenue based on downloads, no one will be scraping mine.
Your not God dude, you create node sets we get it. My numbers legit speak for themselves. Im no peewee here. Watch that attitude 🫡
I could care less about your perspective. Youll see in due time. Ill get mine and hell get removed. Id also like to point out that you have such a weakminded stance on it. You choose not to capitalize on your work. I choose to. And when were given any type of revenue based on downloads, no one will be scraping mine.
Your not God dude, you create node sets we get it. My numbers legit speak for themselves. Im no peewee here. Watch that attitude 🫡
This isn't going anywhere unless host wants to... You don't understand what you've agreed to, apparently, and have stated no stipulations or license in the original work, and even state the licenses for models carry forward. That's it. And your opinions after the fact don't apply in retrospect to an agreement in cloning repos. They're snapshots.
And bud, your professional contact is a gmail, something automatically screened out most places. I think you're projecting.
If you're claiming a license violation, point to the exact term being violated. Your own repo says the original licenses carry forward unchanged and adds no no-mirroring restriction. Nothing in the stated terms makes this mirror improper.
I could care less about your perspective. Youll see in due time. Ill get mine and hell get removed. Id also like to point out that you have such a weakminded stance on it. You choose not to capitalize on your work. I choose to. And when were given any type of revenue based on downloads, no one will be scraping mine.
Your not God dude, you create node sets we get it. My numbers legit speak for themselves. Im no peewee here. Watch that attitude 🫡
This isn't going anywhere unless host wants to... You don't understand what you've agreed to, apparently, and have stated no stipulations or license in the original work, and even state the licenses for models carry forward. That's it. And your opinions after the fact don't apply in retrospect to an agreement in cloning repos. They're snapshots.
And bud, your professional contact is a gmail, something automatically screened out most places. I think you're projecting.
If you're claiming a license violation, point to the exact term being violated. Your own repo says the original licenses carry forward unchanged and adds no no-mirroring restriction. Nothing in the stated terms makes this mirror improper.
Brother listen, i UNDERSTAND the legality behind it. Im simply stating its bad practice. Thats all man. Im not trying to argue with you and im sorry if you felt any distain from what ive said.
Im just trying to not only preserve contributors value but also ensure our work is appreciate by the host here. The more we push, the more we can obtain. And without the drive to do so, were all just throwing contributions into an endless well.
I hope you can understand what im conveying here. AI is in infancy and we have so much potential to make everyone enjoy the fruits of their labor.
Have a good day bud
I find it interesting that while being a super Youtuber, you don't have the common sense to remove the NSFW prompts from your workflows before you upload them. Feel free to check your Krea2 Low VRAM workflow. And the bypassed Prompt cycler node in your KREAMAGINE GGUF workflow that's not even piped in to anything. I won't bother going through the rest. Going two-for-two on this exercise, I'm sure I'd find plenty of other examples of how amateur hour you are.
Don't sprain your ankle coming down off your high horse. And if you're doing this for monetary reasons, you're in the wrong game.
I find it interesting that while being a super Youtuber, you don't have the common sense to remove the NSFW prompts from your workflows before you upload them. Feel free to check your Krea2 Low VRAM workflow. And the bypassed Prompt cycler node in your KREAMAGINE GGUF workflow that's not even piped in to anything. I won't bother going through the rest. Going two-for-two on this exercise, I'm sure I'd find plenty of other examples of how amateur hour you are.
Don't sprain your ankle coming down off your high horse. And if you're doing this for monetary reasons, you're in the wrong game.
Wait, you thought this stung? 😂 buddy i dont punch down. Have a blessed one 🙏😎
Going two-for-two on this exercise, I'm sure I'd find plenty of other examples of how amateur hour you are.
Btw, your 0-2. 🤫😂
The krea workflow contains conditioning rebalance node FOR NSFW. The prompt is intentional.
And the prompt cycler was left there FOR A VIDEO intentionally. People wanted it.
If your mad your not where YOU want to be, dont blame me. I can tell your obviously an angry human and projecting whatever your going thru.
Have a good day bud and do better 🫶🫡