Manifest Specialist โ€” Demand Planning & Forecasting

A specialized supply-chain domain-expert โ€” focused entirely on demand planning & forecasting.

Manifest Demand Planning is a domain-expert in the Manifest family: where the general Manifest orchestrator models cover all of supply chain, this one is tuned specifically for demand planning and forecasting โ€” baseline vs promotional uplift, forecast methods, seasonality, and forecast accuracy.

  • Family: Manifest ยท Type: domain-expert (specialized) ยท Size: 2B
  • Specialty: demand planning & forecasting

Preferred 82.5% of the time over the base model โ€” 100% with matched format

On a focused 20-question planning benchmark, an independent LLM judge panel preferred this model's answer over the base model's 82.5% of the time (16 wins / 3 losses / 1 tie), and 100% of the time (20 / 0 / 0) when both models were given the same answer format โ€” the strongest result in the Manifest specialist line.

Best for

Demand planning and forecasting questions where a focused, practitioner's answer beats a generic one:

  • Baseline vs promotional-uplift separation and event forecasting
  • Choosing and tuning forecast methods (moving average, exponential smoothing, etc.)
  • Seasonality, forecast accuracy (MAPE/bias) and demand-sensing trade-offs

See the difference

Same question. Base model vs this specialist.

Ask (supply-chain director, mostly manual planning, prepping a trade promotion): "Why separate baseline demand from promotional uplift?"

Base model โ†’ "โ€ฆthe separation of baseline demand from promotional uplift is critical for this mid-market scenario due to the company's reliance on a simple moving averageโ€ฆ" โ€” hedged and generic.

Manifest Demand Planning โ†’ "A moving average of total history lumps every past period together, so it smears a one-time promo into a baseline and then over-forecasts the weeks after the eventโ€ฆ" โ€” direct, mechanism-first, practitioner framing.

The Manifest family

Two kinds of models:

๐Ÿงญ Orchestrators โ€” general-purpose, handle any supply-chain area

Model Size Preferred over base Status
Manifest 0.8B 0.8B 68.5% โœ… available
Manifest 2B 2B 88.4% โœ… available
Manifest 4B 4B 90.9% โœ… available

๐ŸŽฏ Domain-experts โ€” specialized for a single area

Model Preferred over base Status
Manifest Specialist ยท Risk & Resilience 72.5% โœ… available
Manifest Specialist ยท Inventory Optimization 77.5% โœ… available
Manifest Specialist ยท Demand Planning 82.5% โœ… available

Orchestrators are scored on the general supply-chain benchmark; domain-experts on their focused domain benchmark.

How to use

This is a LoRA adapter (~44 MB), applied on top of its base model at load time.

from peft import PeftModel
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer

base = "Qwen/Qwen3.5-2B"  # base model โ€” see "Built on" below
tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(base)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(base, device_map="auto")
model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(model, "metafloor-ai/manifest-specialist-demand-planning")

SYSTEM = "You are a senior supply chain expert. Answer correctly and concisely."
msgs = [{"role": "system", "content": SYSTEM},
        {"role": "user", "content": "How should I forecast a new SKU with only 8 weeks of history and a promo coming up?"}]
inputs = tok.apply_chat_template(msgs, add_generation_prompt=True, return_dict=True, return_tensors="pt")
out = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=512, temperature=0.7)
print(tok.decode(out[0][inputs["input_ids"].shape[-1]:], skip_special_tokens=True))

Prompt tip: include the asker's role and operating scale (revenue, SKUs, suppliers, nodes, lead time) for the sharpest answers.

Training details

Method LoRA (PEFT 0.20.0), rank 16 / alpha 16 / dropout 0.05
Target modules all attention + MLP projections
Trainable params 10,911,744 (~0.9% of the 1.21B base)
Epochs 3
Final loss 1.78

The training data is a focused, proprietary demand-planning dataset and is not open-sourced โ€” only the held-out evaluation benchmark (supply-chain-eval) is public.

Evaluation

Scored on a focused 20-question demand-planning benchmark โ€” pairwise LLM-as-judge (2-model panel), this model's answer vs the base model's for the same prompt.

Comparison Win-rate W / L / T
Manifest Demand Planning vs base 82.5% 16 / 3 / 1
Manifest Demand Planning vs base + format 100% 20 / 0 / 0

Benchmark: supply-chain-eval (planning split). The sample is small (20 items), so treat exact figures as directional.

Intended use & limitations

  • Intended use: decision-support and drafting for demand planning & forecasting questions.
  • Out of scope: not legally binding, contractual, or safety-critical guidance; no access to your live systems. Verify outputs before acting.
  • Limitations: English-only; specialized to demand planning (use a Manifest orchestrator for general questions); trained on synthetic data; standard LLM risks apply.

License

Released under CC-BY-NC-4.0 โ€” free for research and non-commercial use, with attribution. Commercial use requires a license from MetaFloor โ€” get in touch at metafloor.ai.

Built on

This model is a LoRA adapter over Qwen/Qwen3.5-2B (used under its own license); the base model is required to load the adapter.

Citation

@misc{metafloor_manifest_demand_planning,
  title  = {Manifest Specialist โ€” Demand Planning: a demand-planning domain-expert (MetaFloor Manifest family)},
  author = {MetaFloor AI},
  year   = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/metafloor-ai/manifest-specialist-demand-planning}}
}
Downloads last month
19
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. ๐Ÿ™‹ Ask for provider support

Model tree for metafloor-ai/manifest-specialist-demand-planning

Finetuned
Qwen/Qwen3.5-2B
Adapter
(179)
this model

Collection including metafloor-ai/manifest-specialist-demand-planning

Evaluation results

  • Preferred over base model by independent LLM judge panel on supply-chain-eval (planning)
    self-reported
    0.825