LFM2.5-230M beats LFM2.5-350M on GSM8K?

#10
by coder543 - opened

I converted both models to bf16 GGUFs, and used llama-eval locally to run gsm8k in the regex eval mode against them.

I saw 24.6% for LFM2.5-350M and 29.7% for LFM2.5-230M. Strangely, the 230M model is winning by a significant, repeatable margin.

The benchmarks make it seem like the 350M should be better at everything, so I find this result confusing? Maybe I did something wrong?

Hey, I ran GSM8K in an avg@10 setting with temperature=0.6: LFM2.5-230M gets 29.08% and LFM2.5-350M gets 28.36%. Both models are very close across all math evals.

I'd be slightly suspicious about the score provided by llama-eval. Maybe something related to parsing?

Yeah, I’m not sure. I was impressed at how much better LFM2.5-230M was compared to my previous experience testing out Gemma 3 270M, so then I thought maybe the 350M would be even better.

I think these tiny models are starting to get useful, so I can only imagine where they’ll be at next year!

Sign up or log in to comment