HeOCR R7: Hebrew printed-text recognition for Tesseract

R7 is a Tesseract language model (.traineddata) for printed modern Hebrew. HeOCR made it by fine-tuning Tesseract's own heb model from tessdata_best on 95,151 real scanned lines from 30 public-domain books. Seven of the books are National Library of Israel "public domain, free use" scans; 23 are university-library scans from the Internet Archive. Each line is labelled with the Project Ben-Yehuda transcription of the same edition, never with OCR output.

It has the same recipe and the same base as HeOCR R6, on about seven times as many lines from six times as many books. It does not continue from R6.

What it gains, and what it does not. R7 is better than stock Tesseract on printed Hebrew pages, but no better than R6:

  • On 38 real printed pages with human-adjudicated references, it lowers the character error rate (CER) from 0.226 (stock) to 0.209, and the word error rate (WER) from 0.473 to 0.393.
  • Against R6 it is a tie on CER (0.2089 against 0.2094; R7 βˆ’ R6 = βˆ’0.0005 [βˆ’0.0072, +0.0061]). Its WER is slightly lower, but the interval includes zero.
  • On the 10 hardest of those pages it is no better than stock Tesseract or R6, and its CER point estimate is slightly worse (see Evaluation).

R7 supersedes nothing. R6 remains valid. Use R7 if you want the newer model trained on more varied books; it has no measured page-level gain over R6.

It is released on its own, with no link to HeOCR's kraken pipeline (R4d, A1, R3h).

File heocr_r7.traineddata (trained as heb.traineddata), 3,628,595 bytes
sha256 95faab81fba6fe57f854f973c1ccad2b0d1059fb951f34b17277385ceea8b303
Model type recognition (line-level LSTM, CTC); Tesseract does the page layout
Format Tesseract 4/5 LSTM traineddata, LSTM only (--oem 1; no legacy engine). Trained and tested with Tesseract 5.5.3
Base model tessdata_best heb.traineddata at e12c65a (Apache-2.0), sha256 dbaa827aea6bc21215638447f17783a1004987c2d0bf5573d111fee397abdae5, fine-tuned (modified) by HeOCR
Licence Apache-2.0, Copyright (c) 2026 HeOCR maintainers (see LICENSE and NOTICE)
Training record r7_training_run.json (heocr_tesseract_training_run.v1)
Code HeOCR/heocr-engine

Uses

  • OCR of printed Hebrew pages, books and periodicals in the square script, such as 19th- and early-20th-century book type, without niqqud. Use it in place of Tesseract's heb.
  • Line recognition of single printed Hebrew line images, for example lines found by another segmenter.
  • A research baseline for Hebrew OCR on real scans, and for comparison with R6: the two differ only in their training lines.

Out of scope

  • Handwriting. R7 was trained on print only.
  • Niqqud (vowel points) and cantillation. The training labels have none, and fully pointed books were left out (see Training data). How R7 behaves on pointed text was not measured.
  • Rashi script and other non-square Hebrew scripts, and medieval or other historical hands.
  • Unsupervised transcription. Its CER on real pages is still about 0.21 (one character in five). Check the output.
  • Documents that are not mainly Hebrew. No Latin text was in the training lines.

How to get started with the model

Install Tesseract 4 or 5 (tested with 5.5.3). Put heocr_r7.traineddata in a directory, say DIR, and pass that directory and the language name heocr_r7.

Whole pages: page segmentation mode 3 (automatic layout, Tesseract's default). The page figures below use it.

tesseract page.png out -l heocr_r7 --tessdata-dir DIR --psm 3

This writes out.txt, in logical (reading) order.

Single line images: psm 13 (raw line). Do not use psm 7 on line crops: with stock heb and with R6, psm 7 returned empty text on crops that carry a sliver of the neighbouring line. R7 has the same recognizer and was not tested separately for this.

tesseract line.png out -l heocr_r7 --tessdata-dir DIR --psm 13

Notes:

  • --tessdata-dir replaces Tesseract's data directory. Output formats other than plain text (tsv, hocr, pdf, alto) read their config files from DIR/configs. Link or copy the configs folder of your Tesseract installation into DIR, or put heocr_r7.traineddata in your installation's own tessdata directory and drop --tessdata-dir.
  • The language name is the file name without .traineddata. heocr_r7 follows tessdata's naming (chi_sim, deu_latf). It combines with other models in the usual way, for example -l heocr_r7+eng, which runs but was not evaluated.

Training details

Training data

Lines: 95,151 real line images, the train split of HeOCR's bynli_lines_v2 line set (Ben-Yehuda Γ— NLI and Internet Archive), after two filters (below). They come from 30 books: 19,820 lines from 7 NLI scans and 75,331 from 23 Internet Archive scans. Each record is capped at 6,100 lines, so no book has more than 6.4% of the lines; Smolenskin's collected works, three Internet Archive volumes, have 18.6% together.

Source Record Book Lines
NLI 990017640460205171 Leo Tolstoy (1828–1910), Anna Karenina, Hebrew translation by Yosef Eliyahu Triwosch (1855–1940), Moscow: A. Y. Stybel, 1918–1922 6,100
NLI 990020308000205171 Yeshayahu Berashadsky (1871–1908), Ketavim Aharonim, Warsaw: Tushiya, 1910 6,076
NLI 990020495520205171 Shmuel Leib Citron (1860–1930), Me-Ahorei ha-Pargod, Vilna: Z. Matz, 1923–1925 6,052
NLI 990020522850205171 Shmuel Tchernowitz (1879–1929), Im Shahar, Jerusalem: Ha-Madpis, 1927 1,511
NLI 990020466440205171 David Frischmann (1859–1922), Be-Yom ha-Kippurim, Warsaw: Y. Alapin, 1881 72
NLI 990019385920205171 Azriel Natan Frank (1863–1924), Sefer Agadot ha-Zohar, Warsaw: Ahiasaf, 1923–1924 8
NLI 990013538860205171 Yitzhak Katzenelson (1885–1944), Shirim, Lodz: Hovevei Shira, 1938 1
IA kolsifreperetsbe03smoluoft Peretz Smolenskin (d. 1885), Kol Sifre, vol. 3, Vilna: M. Katzenellenbogen, 1905 6,100
IA sifrehazikhronot00mont Israel Hayyim Tavyov (d. 1920), Sifre ha-Zikhronot le-Sir Moshe Montefiore, Warsaw: Tushiya, 1898 6,100
IA kolsifreperetsbe01smoluoft Peretz Smolenskin (d. 1885), Kol Sifre, vol. 1, Vilna: M. Katzenellenbogen, 1905 6,096
IA kolsifreperetsbe05smoluoft Peretz Smolenskin (d. 1885), Kol Sifre, vol. 5, Vilna: M. Katzenellenbogen, 1905 5,489
IA miyarketetevel008800 Zvi Kasdai (d. 1937), Mi-Yarkete Tevel, Jerusalem: A. M. Luncz, 1914 4,760
IA ldpd_15772050_000 Ludwig Philippson (d. 1889), Ya'akov Tirado, translated by Samuel Joseph Fuenn (d. 1891), Vilna: S. Y. Fuenn, 1881 4,639
IA mabeothayehudims00raff Samuel Raffaeli (d. 1923), Matbe'ot ha-Yehudim, Jerusalem: E. Dainard, 1913 4,135
IA atn3681.0001.001.umich.edu Menahem Mendel Dolitzky (d. 1931), Shevet Sofer, Vienna: G. Brag, 1883 4,027
IA maloketravseadya00bornuoft Hayyim Yehiel Bornstein (d. 1928), Mahloket Rav Sa'adyah Ga'on u-Ben Meir, Warsaw: Schuldberg, 1904 3,643
IA mimitsrayimhusef00fran Ludwig August Frankl (d. 1894), Mi-Mitsrayim, translated by Abraham Baer Gottlober (d. 1899) and Meir Halevi Letteris (d. 1871), Vienna: J. Holzwarth, 1862 3,529
IA ademataidibruivr00benyuoft Eliezer Ben-Yehuda (d. 1922), Ad Ematai Dibru Ivrit?, New York: Kadima, 1919 2,980
IA agadothatanaim11bach Wilhelm Bacher (d. 1913), Agadot ha-Tanna'im, translated by Alexander Siskind Rabinovitz (d. 1945), Berlin and Jerusalem: Dvir, 1922 2,977
IA motsaegolahzikhr00rabbuoft Saul Pinchas Rabinowitz (d. 1910), Motsa'e Golah, Warsaw: Ahiasaf, 1894 2,836
IA peereakhmemedina00gree Jekuthiel Judah Greenwald (d. 1955), Pe'ere Hakhme Medinatenu, Sighet: A. Kaufman, 1910 2,776
IA imanuelharomimon0000tche Shaul Tchernichovsky (d. 1943), Immanuel ha-Romi, Berlin: Eshkol, 1924 2,572
IA mishnatrishonimt0000klat Jacob Klatzkin (d. 1948), Mishnat Rishonim, Berlin: Eshkol, 1924 2,553
IA igrothaasirmeiha00drey Alfred Dreyfus (d. 1935), Igrot ha-Asir me-I ha-Shedim, translated by Abraham Shalom Friedberg (d. 1902), Warsaw: M. Spektor and E. Berman, 1898 2,487
IA masaleeretsyirae00lewi Elhanan Leib Lewinsky (d. 1910), Massa le-Erets Yisra'el bi-Shnat 800, Berlin: Kelal, 1922 1,917
IA sepherhayyeyehud01mode Leon of Modena (d. 1648), Sefer Hayye Yehudah, Kiev, 1912 1,491
IA reginahashkenazi00ginsuoft Pesach Ginzburg (d. 1947), Regina Ashkenazi, London: Iyim, 1918 1,304
IA anshekayruan00pozn Samuel Abraham PoznaΕ„ski (d. 1921), Anshe Kairuan, Berlin, 1909 1,218
IA maamarmagenetsin00mode Leon of Modena (d. 1648), Ma'amar Magen ve-Tsinah, edited by Abraham Geiger (d. 1874), Breslau: H. Sulzbach, 1856 1,145
IA hegyoneshpinozah00rubi Salomon Rubin (d. 1910), Hegyone Shpinozah, Krakow: A. Faust, 1897 557
  • NLI scans: From the collections of the National Library of Israel / ΧžΧΧ•Χ‘Χ£ Χ”Χ‘Χ€Χ¨Χ™Χ™Χ” Χ”ΧœΧΧ•ΧžΧ™Χͺ. Each record's IIIF manifest carries NLI's "public domain, free use" licence. They were fetched from NLI's IIIF service. No Google-digitized "public domain, non-commercial use" scan was used.
  • Internet Archive scans: each item was scanned by a university library, named in the NOTICE (the University of Toronto for 15 of them; also Michigan, Columbia, Duke, Brandeis, Illinois, Ohio State and Florida). None was digitized by Google or comes from NLI. They were fetched from the Internet Archive, which publishes them without an explicit licence; the original conditions of each item on the Internet Archive still apply. Each item passed HeOCR's Internet Archive rights gate, and each book has its own recorded rights justification (author death years, publication year and place, digitizer, route), listed by id in the training record.
  • Text: the Project Ben-Yehuda public-domain transcription of the same edition (public domain dump, release 2026-03), placed on each scanned line by HeOCR's alignment tool (hocrgen F8f). Lines were kept only where the alignment scored at least 0.9 and its text agreed with Tesseract's reading of the line at a similarity of at least 0.7. Tesseract only located the lines and chose between candidate spans at a line's edges; no label is OCR output.
  • Label normalisation: Unicode NFC, logical order. Niqqud removed; … written as ..., β€ž as ", soft hyphens removed. The training labels contain no niqqud and no Latin letters; 2,820 of them contain digits.
  • Pointed prints dropped: fully pointed books were left out (Hiawatha, Pines, Meyuhas, Mahamadim, Mandelkern, and two Internet Archive items). Mi-Mitsrayim and Shirim are unpointed prints whose edition text carries some niqqud; it was removed from their labels.
  • Two filters on the train lines: 69 lines that share a word 6-gram with a selection line were removed (63 of them from Shevet Sofer, atn3681, which the Brainin selection book quotes), and so were 145 lines containing Χ³, Χ΄ or β€”, which are not in the character set.
  • Edition spelling: Ben-Yehuda's text sometimes differs from the print. Such variants are in the labels.
  • All authors, translators and named contributors died more than 70 years ago, so the books are in the public domain in Israel. Every book except Shirim (1938, one line) was printed before 1931 and is also past the US term; Shirim has no established US status.

Selection lines (not trained on): 7,113 lines of three NLI "public domain, free use" books, held out whole: Reuven Brainin (1862–1939), Avraham Mapu: Hayav u-Sfarav, Tushiya, 1928 (990018546440205171, 4,046 lines); Kadish Yehuda Silman (1880–1937), Sansinim, Tarbut, 1929 (990020250940205171, 3,046 lines); and Menahem Mendel Bodek (1825–1874), Pe'er mi-Kedoshim, Lemberg, about 1870 (990010684570205171, 21 lines). The first two are R6's selection books, so 99.7% of the selection lines are R6's.

Training procedure and hyperparameters

The recipe is R6's. Only the line set and the number of iterations changed.

  • Start: tessdata_best heb (e12c65a), its LSTM extracted with combine_tessdata. The network is the base's own, unchanged: [1,36,0,1Ct3,3,16Mp3,3Lfys48Lfx96Lrx96Lfx192O1c1]. R7 does not start from R6, so the R6–R7 comparison isolates the data and the training length.
  • Character set: the base's, plus the maqaf ΦΎ and the en dash –; R6's starter file, byte for byte. The output layer grew from 69 to 70 codes. The dictionary is the base's own word list, rebuilt with Tesseract's build files from langdata_lstm 07930fd (Apache-2.0).
  • Truth order: each label is written in Tesseract's LSTM training order: the logical line reversed, punctuation not mirrored, digit runs kept left to right. Each line was converted to .lstmf with tesseract … --psm 13 lstm.train.
  • Trainer: lstmtraining --continue_from the base, Tesseract 5.5.3, on CPU. Two arms of 200,000 iterations each (--target_error_rate 0.01), about two passes over the lines:
    • lrdef: the learning rate stored in the base, not set on the command line;
    • lr1e4: --learning_rate 0.0001 --reset_learning_rate.
  • Selection: the checkpoint with the lowest BCER (lstmeval) on the selection lines, over all 89 saved checkpoints of both arms. That is lr1e4 at iteration 117,100 (heb_0.634_52608_117100): BCER 1.567%, BWER 4.463%. The best lrdef checkpoint scored 2.095% / 5.733%.
  • Conversion: lstmtraining --stop_training to heb.traineddata, renamed heocr_r7.traineddata for release (same bytes).
  • One training run. It is not deterministic, and the bytes are not reproducible.

Evaluation

Real pages

  • Testing data: E2d4c, 38 real printed Hebrew pages from 14 Hebrew Wikisource Indexes, with human-adjudicated references (hocrgen manifest e2d4c_wikisource_printed_v7), the same set and references as R6's card. They are a scored set under heocr-engine decision 0012: no training, tuning or checkpoint choice used them, R7 was scored on them once after selection, and their works are held out of training.
  • Metric: CER and WER under hocrgen's primary.v1 normalisation (hocrgen d4a3414 evaluate-references), pooled over pages. Every engine reads whole pages with Tesseract 5.5.3, psm 3.
  • Intervals: 95% paired bootstrap, resampling pages, then Wikisource Indexes (clusters); 2,000 resamples, seed 20261106.
Engine CER, 38 pages WER, 38 pages CER, 10 pages WER, 10 pages
Stock Tesseract heb (Homebrew) 0.226 0.473 0.384 0.588
tessdata_best heb (R6's and R7's base) 0.225 0.481 0.376 0.609
R6 0.209 0.407 0.383 0.585
R7 0.209 0.393 0.393 0.568
R7 minus Ξ”CER, 38 pages (page; cluster) Ξ”WER, 38 pages (page; cluster)
stock Tesseract βˆ’0.0168 [βˆ’0.0285, βˆ’0.0058]; cl [βˆ’0.0336, +0.0063] βˆ’0.0798 [βˆ’0.1066, βˆ’0.0531]; cl [βˆ’0.1203, βˆ’0.0238]
tessdata_best βˆ’0.0157 [βˆ’0.0305, βˆ’0.0013]; cl [βˆ’0.0351, +0.0125] βˆ’0.0877 [βˆ’0.1150, βˆ’0.0600]; cl [βˆ’0.1305, βˆ’0.0287]
R6 βˆ’0.0005 [βˆ’0.0072, +0.0061]; cl [βˆ’0.0094, +0.0121] βˆ’0.0135 [βˆ’0.0273, +0.0004]; cl [βˆ’0.0311, +0.0088]
R7 minus Ξ”CER, 10 pages (page; cluster) Ξ”WER, 10 pages (page; cluster)
stock Tesseract +0.0091 [βˆ’0.0041, +0.0246]; cl [βˆ’0.0094, +0.0202] βˆ’0.0201 [βˆ’0.0469, βˆ’0.0047]; cl [βˆ’0.0861, βˆ’0.0070]
tessdata_best +0.0173 [βˆ’0.0037, +0.0362]; cl [βˆ’0.0096, +0.0392] βˆ’0.0402 [βˆ’0.0872, βˆ’0.0141]; cl [βˆ’0.1588, βˆ’0.0191]
R6 +0.0108 [βˆ’0.0011, +0.0186]; cl [βˆ’0.0097, +0.0210] βˆ’0.0162 [βˆ’0.0463, +0.0000]; cl [βˆ’0.0648, βˆ’0.0066]
  • Against stock Tesseract, on the 38 pages, R7 lowers CER by 0.017 and WER by 0.080. It improves the CER of 24 pages, leaves 3 unchanged and worsens 11. The page interval on CER excludes zero; the cluster interval, over only 14 Indexes, does not.

  • Against R6: a tie. The CER difference is 0.0005, far inside its interval. WER is 0.0135 lower; the page interval only just reaches zero (+0.0004), and the cluster interval includes it. R7 improves 22 pages against R6 and worsens 15. About seven times as many training lines did not move page-level CER.

  • No gain on the hardest pages. The 10-page subset is the pages whose Wikisource Indexes fed none of HeOCR's glyph banks, and stock Tesseract's error is highest there. R7's CER there is 0.393, against stock's 0.384 and R6's 0.383. These differences are within their intervals, but the point estimate is worse than both. R7 improves 4 of the 10 pages against stock and worsens 6. Its WER on these pages is lower than stock's (the interval excludes zero) and R6's (the page interval reaches zero).

  • Why, not yet measured: the line recognizer did improve (see Selection lines). The likely reason the gain does not reach pages is that page-level error on this set is dominated by what the line model does not control: Tesseract's layout and reading order, and typefaces outside the training books.

  • Reference caveat: E2d4c is the human audit of the earlier E2d3d references. Some audit proposals came from places where Tesseract and another engine agreed with each other but not with the reference, so the corrections may lean slightly toward what Tesseract reads. That is why every comparison above is paired on the same references.

  • No text overlap with training. The 95,151 training labels share no word 6-gram with the 38 reference texts (letters only, niqqud stripped), whether each label is checked alone or the labels of each work are joined in reading order; the 7,113 selection labels share none either. The full Ben-Yehuda texts of the 30 training books share 10 6-grams with two reference pages, none of them in a training label:

    • 3 from two Bible verses (Isaiah 26:2, Psalms 118:20), quoted by one Frank story, as in R6's check;
    • 5 from one Bible verse (Psalms 102:14), quoted in Frankl's Mi-Mitsrayim;
    • 2 from a stock rabbinic title formula (אב"Χ“ Χ•Χ¨"מ Χ‘Χ§"Χ§), in Greenwald's Pe'ere Hakhme Medinatenu.

    No evaluation manifest names an NLI record or an Internet Archive identifier of the training or selection books.

Selection lines

On the 7,113 selection lines (Brainin, Silman and Bodek), scored with lstmeval (R6 and R7 against the shared starter, tessdata_best with its own character set):

Model BCER BWER
tessdata_best heb (the base) 11.516% 23.304%
R6 (its selected checkpoint) 2.056% 5.406%
R7 1.567% 4.463%

R7 lowers line BCER by about a quarter. The comparison favours R6: R6's checkpoint was chosen on Brainin and Silman, which are 99.7% of these lines, while R7's was chosen on all of them. The line set kept only lines whose text agreed with stock Tesseract's reading at 0.7 or more, so the figures are optimistic, and they compare models rather than give an absolute level. They are Tesseract-internal error rates on the training-order truth, not hocrgen primary.v1.

Bias, risks and limitations

  • No gain over R6 on pages. R7 ties R6 on CER, on the same base and recipe, with about seven times the lines. Its line-level gain did not carry through to whole pages.
  • A small gain over stock Tesseract, by 0.017 CER, and no gain on the hardest pages, where its CER is slightly worse than stock's. It worsens 11 of 38 pages against stock.
  • Training data from 30 books, printed in Warsaw, Vilna, Vienna, Berlin, Moscow, Jerusalem, London, New York and elsewhere between 1856 and 1938, all but three of them between 1881 and 1927. Smolenskin's collected works are 18.6% of the lines. Other typefaces, layouts and periods may gain less, or lose.
  • Printed Hebrew only. Not for handwriting, Rashi script or non-Hebrew text.
  • No niqqud training. The labels have no vowel points; pointed text was not evaluated.
  • Missing characters. Geresh Χ³, gershayim Χ΄ and the em dash β€” are not in the character set, so R7 cannot output them; lines with them were left out of training.
  • Edition spelling. Ben-Yehuda sometimes modernises or varies the spelling of the print, and the labels carry those variants.
  • Layout is Tesseract's. R7 changes only the line recognizer. Page segmentation and reading order are Tesseract's own, and on complex layouts they dominate the error.
  • One training run, small evaluation. The intervals cover page and Index sampling, not training seeds. 38 pages from 14 Indexes is a small scored set.

Licence and attribution

  • Licence: Apache-2.0. Copyright (c) 2026 HeOCR maintainers.
  • Base model: a modified (fine-tuned) version of tessdata_best heb, Apache-2.0, from the Tesseract OCR project.
  • NOTICE: redistributions must keep the NOTICE file. It credits:
    • the tessdata_best base model and the langdata_lstm build files (Apache-2.0);
    • the National Library of Israel for its scans, with every record id: From the collections of the National Library of Israel / ΧžΧΧ•Χ‘Χ£ Χ”Χ‘Χ€Χ¨Χ™Χ™Χ” Χ”ΧœΧΧ•ΧžΧ™Χͺ;
    • the Internet Archive and the contributing libraries for their scans, with every Internet Archive identifier; the original conditions of each item on the Internet Archive still apply;
    • Project Ben-Yehuda volunteers for the text;
    • Hebrew Wikisource, whose CC BY-SA transcriptions were used for scoring only, never for training.
  • No endorsement. Neither the National Library of Israel, the Internet Archive, the contributing libraries, Project Ben-Yehuda, the Tesseract project nor Wikisource endorses HeOCR or this model.
  • The model contains no scan images or text files. The line crops are not distributed with it.

Provenance and reproduction

Part Identity
Base model tessdata_best heb.traineddata at e12c65a915945e4c28e237a9b52bc4a8f39a0cec, git blob 0fc27335…, sha256 dbaa827aea6bc21215638447f17783a1004987c2d0bf5573d111fee397abdae5
Starter R6's: base character set plus ΦΎ and –, the base's word list, langdata_lstm 07930fd; heb.traineddata sha256 8b9d798a456bd1d4cd8bdf71b3d7b9d7579cea6cbd51302accd57f521669b846
Line set bynli_lines_v2 (schema s16c_benyehuda_nli_lines.v2): manifest.jsonl sha256 53dd7f1a10929ad4a60020ad7f42be62f27ee905cb7e6cfb0e319c5b2f5db7ca, summary.json faf3faf49dbe4e07fef01606ff2dd07ea1aca57062d666be564f57c061860a5f; its 102,478 PNGs concatenated in sorted path order 39c1aa7da99866eea22130151e7c65f69cdff6f729f083dfd1400bff2e41e711. Built with hocrgen 1921bbe; hand-off record hocrgen docs/f8f_r7_handoff.md
Text Project Ben-Yehuda public_domain_dump, release 2026-03
Training Tesseract 5.5.3 lstmtraining (Homebrew), 2026-11-11; selected checkpoint lr1e4/heb_0.634_52608_117100
Training record r7_training_run.json (heocr_tesseract_training_run.v1), in this deposit
Scoring hocrgen d4a3414 evaluate-references, primary.v1, Tesseract 5.5.3 psm 3; references e2d4c_wikisource_printed_v7 (manifest sha256 0de65f63…)

The line set is not yet published. Its per-line manifest names each line's source record (NLI record id or Internet Archive identifier), canvas, box, Ben-Yehuda work and, for Internet Archive lines, the rights justification id, so the training set can be rebuilt from the public scans and texts, or rebuilt without any one book.

Contact

Report problems and questions as issues on HeOCR/heocr-engine. A rights concern about any source book can be raised the same way, or by email to heocrproject@gmail.com; name the NLI record id or the Internet Archive identifier. The takedown procedure is at heocr.github.io/rights.html.

Citation

Cite this model by its version DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.24126449.

Downloads last month

-

Downloads are not tracked for this model. How to track
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. πŸ™‹ Ask for provider support