Escha Runtime β€” qwen3dense

By Escha Labs Inc.

The serving runtime for Escha 2-/3-bit (escha) quantized models of the qwen3_5 dense architecture (Qwen3.8-27B and siblings). One repo per model architecture, one directory per engine β€” this architecture currently has one engine, sglang/.

SGLang β€” sglang/
Best for everything: single user, teams, agents
Concurrency continuous batching, paged KV, optional radix prefix cache
Tool calls / JSON schema / thinking parser yes
Interface OpenAI-compatible (/v1/chat/completions, /v1/completions, /v1/models)
Install Python 3.12 venv + CUDA-12 PyTorch, then one wheel

The engine is a fork of SGLang bundled inside the wheel, running the Escha CUDA kernels. No separate sglang install is needed, and none should be present β€” the wheel ships its own.

Compatible models

Model repo Bits
EschaLabs/Qwen3.8-27B-Escha-W2 2-bit, mixed-rate (escha)

This runtime targets the qwen3_5 dense architecture. Its wheel also happens to register the eschamoe mixture-of-experts method, so a qwen3_5_moe model will load too β€” but the tuning, the defaults in sglang/serve.sh and the documentation here are all written for the dense architecture. For a mixture-of-experts model use escha-runtime-qwen3moe, whose defaults are measured on it. A model of a genuinely different architecture will not load β€” use the matching escha-runtime-<arch> repo.

Quickstart

Full detail, including the per-GPU cookbook and troubleshooting: sglang/INSTALL.md.

python3.12 -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -U pip wheel
pip install "torch==2.9.*" --index-url https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu128   # cu12 torch FIRST
pip install ./sglang/escha-*.whl   # pulls the bundled sglang fork + its full dep closure

hf download EschaLabs/Qwen3.8-27B-Escha-W2 --local-dir ./Qwen3.8-27B-Escha-W2
MODEL=./Qwen3.8-27B-Escha-W2 bash sglang/serve.sh

Then check the stack and the endpoint:

python -c "import torch, escha, sglang; print(torch.cuda.is_available(), hasattr(torch.ops.escha, 'escham_decode_gemv'), escha.__version__)"
curl -s http://127.0.0.1:30000/v1/models | python3 -m json.tool

pip install "torch==2.9.*" is a hard pin, not a suggestion. A bare torch>=2.9 resolves to a newer minor and import escha then fails with undefined symbol: _ZN3c10... β€” the compiled extension is ABI-linked to libtorch, and that ABI is not stable across PyTorch minors.

Thinking, and why you probably want a budget

This is a reasoning model. With thinking on, the reasoning arrives in reasoning_content and the answer in content β€” read both, or you will see half the response.

Two per-request levers, both inside chat_template_kwargs (a top-level enable_thinking field is silently ignored):

{ "chat_template_kwargs": {"enable_thinking": true, "reasoning_effort": "xhigh"} }

reasoning_effort is "xhigh" (the default), "medium" or "low"; anything else makes the template raise, which surfaces as an HTTP 400 rather than a silent fallback. It works by injecting one sentence of system instruction β€” xhigh asks the model to validate assumptions and weigh alternatives, low asks it to keep thinking brief, and medium injects nothing at all, so medium is the neutral, unsteered model rather than a midpoint. It therefore asks for shorter reasoning; it does not bound it. If you are running a benchmark or an agent, set a thinking budget instead, which forces </think> after N reasoning tokens so an answer is always produced: see sglang/INSTALL.md β†’ Bounded thinking and sglang/thinking_budget.py. Without one, the usual failure is finish_reason: "length" with content: null, which a harness scores as wrong rather than as slow.

Requirements

  • NVIDIA GPU, compute capability 8.0–12.0 (Ampere β†’ Blackwell), Linux x86-64 with glibc β‰₯ 2.28. The kernel launch route auto-selects per GPU; you never set it. Per-architecture and per-VRAM launch recipes: sglang/INSTALL.md β†’ Running on your GPU.
  • Python 3.12 (the wheel is cp312-only) + CUDA-12 PyTorch 2.9.x. The wheel handles every other dependency.
  • A working host C compiler and Python dev headers. Triton JIT-compiles a small shim at CUDA-graph capture time β€” this is separate from ptxas and from a CUDA toolkit, so "driver only" does not cover it. On slim container images a stripped libisl breaks cc1 while gcc --version still succeeds, and the failure surfaces ~40 s in as a gcc CalledProcessError inside cuda_graph_runner.py β€” which reads like a runtime bug and is not. Preflight in sglang/INSTALL.md.
  • 24 GB VRAM for the shipped defaults (65,536-token context, ~8–9 concurrent streams) with a ~10.15 GB model. Note the stream ceiling: MAMBA_RATIO=0.3 sizes the recurrent-state pool, which clamps max_running_requests to 8–9 on a 24 GB card, so the 12/16 entries in the default CUDA_GRAPH_BS are dropped and never captured. To serve more streams raise MAXREQ/MAXMAMBA with MEM β€” the throughput recipe is in the model card. 16 GB should fit at a reduced context β€” the cookbook has a recipe, but we have not run it.

Changelog

1.2.0 (2026-08-21) β€” tensor parallelism (--tp-size N) now works. The escha parameter class pins its own weight loader, which meant sglang's TP slicing never ran and every rank kept the whole checkpoint (rank 0 died with weight must have shape (dim, width)). It now slices per rank, including the fused-on-disk GDN in_proj_qkv, which is split into its three sub-projections first.

Single-GPU users are unaffected. Every new code path is gated on world_size > 1; at --tp-size 1 the loader is byte-for-byte what 1.1.1 did. Verified as an identical shard layout and byte-identical greedy output.

TP > 1 is new and lightly tested β€” treat it as experimental. It was contributed and validated by @ginerJuanUdesa on 2Γ— RTX 3090 (symmetric 6.02 GB/rank, coherent greedy output). We have one GPU and could not reproduce it, and no numerical equivalence check against --tp-size 1 has been run yet. If you use it for evaluation, sanity-check a benchmark against the single-GPU numbers first. Note that a multi-rank all-reduce reorders float accumulation, so TP > 1 output is not expected to match TP = 1 bit-for-bit even when correct.

On Ampere/Ada/Hopper you can add DETERMINISTIC=1 to remove that reduction-order variance if you want a stricter comparison.

1.1.1 (2026-08-21) β€” process_weights_after_loading now takes the rank's device instead of a hardcoded cuda:0. The hardcode put every 2-bit buffer on cuda:0 while the input tensor sat on the server's actual device, so any run not on device 0 β€” --tp-size > 1, or a single-GPU launch with --base-gpu-id N and no CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES β€” hit an illegal memory access on the first forward, behind a traceback that pointed at the kernel rather than at the cause. Bit-identical wherever cuda:0 was already correct, which is every configuration serve.sh ships. Reported with a diagnosis and a fix by @ginerJuanUdesa.

1.1.0 (2026-08-20) β€” first wheel with the dense (escha) serving path; the 1.0.x wheels registered eschamoe only, so a dense checkpoint failed at registry lookup.

Known limitations

  • Serving throughput has been measured on three cards β€” RTX 5090 (32 GB, sm_120), RTX 4090 (24 GB, sm_89) and RTX 3090 (24 GB, sm_86); the 5090 and 3090 by independent evaluators working only from these docs. The 4090 is also where the model's thinking-on benchmarks (GPQA-Diamond, LiveCodeBench) were produced; its thinking-off commonsense suite ran on an L40. The 16 GB and 40 GB+ tiers in the cookbook remain configuration guidance derived from the model size and the wheel's architecture coverage, not measurements. Per-GPU numbers live on the model card.
  • On Ampere the auto-selected kernel route is the slower one at batch 1. ESCHA_ROUTE resolves to lovelace on sm_80/sm_86, but forcing ESCHA_ROUTE=blackwell measured 1.72Γ— faster single-stream on an RTX 3090 (23.6 β†’ 40.7 tok/s, TPOT 42.4 β†’ 24.6 ms) with identical output. The two routes are bit-identical launch geometries, so this is safe to set; the gain is batch-1-only (parity at 2–16). Serving one user on Ampere? Set it.
  • DETERMINISTIC=1 fails on consumer Blackwell (sm_120). The deterministic attention kernel requests 104 KB of shared memory per block, above the sm_120 limit, and the server exits during startup. It works on Ampere, Ada and Hopper.
  • Greedy output is not bit-reproducible across requests. Batch composition changes fp16 accumulation order, so a near-tie can flip and a long reasoning chain diverges from there. Two identical greedy requests may return different text. Use DETERMINISTIC=1 when you need reproducibility, and never A/B two configurations by diffing one generation.
  • CUDA-graph batch sizes are capped at 32, the decode kernel's maximum M (torch.ops.escha.escham_decode_gemv_max_m()). The shipped default list stops at 16 because that is where aggregate throughput peaks on a 4090; capture at 24/32 works and is worth it if you serve that many streams. Past 32 a batch falls through to a large-M path meant for prefill, so the runtime refuses to capture it rather than bake in the wrong kernel.
  • ATTN_BACKEND=triton is required on consumer Blackwell (RTX 50-series). The default flashinfer backend asserts on this hybrid architecture at sm_120. The assertion names three acceptable backends β€” triton, trtllm_mha, fa4 β€” of which only triton has been run on this model. Note that sm_120 shows steeper long-prompt decode decay than sm_89 (88.5% vs 96.3% of short-prompt rate at a 5,000-token prompt); the attention path is the obvious suspect and nobody has run the A/B that would confirm it.
  • The model's stock chat template raises on a few malformed conversations (a missing user query, a system message in the wrong position). That surfaces as an HTTP 400 from the template, not as a server fault.

License

Everything here is released under the Apache License, Version 2.0 β€” see LICENSE. All bundled third-party code is permissive (Apache-2.0 / MIT / BSD-3-Clause) β€” no copyleft. Full texts and the component inventory: THIRD_PARTY_LICENSES/. Model weights are not in this repo and carry their own license in the model repository.

Downloads last month

-

Downloads are not tracked for this model. How to track
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. πŸ™‹ Ask for provider support