yolov7-seg optimized for Arm-based Edge Linux systems
An INT8-quantized version of yolov7-seg for instance segmentation, exported to ExecuTorch (.pte) and optimized for Arm-based Edge Linux systems.
Summary
This repository contains an Arm-optimized version of yolov7-seg for instance segmentation, quantized to INT8 via static PTQ — per-channel symmetric weights, per-tensor symmetric activations. The model is provided in ExecuTorch (.pte) format, targeting Edge Linux systems.
This version is intended to demonstrate efficient inference on Arm-based platforms while preserving the original model's intended behavior. Arm has evaluated this model on COCO 2017 and measured performance on a representative evaluation target.
Key results
| Area | Result |
|---|---|
| Model format | ExecuTorch (.pte) |
| Target device class | Edge Linux |
| Reference device | Raspberry Pi 5 (Cortex-A76, Linux Raspberry Pi OS 64-bit, based on Debian 13 "Trixie") |
| Primary performance result | p50 latency 1880.52 ms (2.68x faster than baseline) |
| Accuracy result | Segm mAP@0.5:0.95 40.09%, Segm mAP@0.5 63.55% |
| Size / memory result | 40.84 MB (3.59x smaller), peak memory 277.69 MB |
Original model
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Original model | yolov7-seg |
| Original source | GitHub |
| Original developer | YOLOv7 (Chien-Yao Wang, Alexey Bochkovskiy and Hong-Yuan Mark Liao) |
| Original model card | YOLOv7 repository |
| Original license | GPL-3.0 |
Model files
| File | Description |
|---|---|
yolov7-seg_raspberry_executorch_optimized.pte |
Arm-optimized INT8 model for deployment |
example.py |
Minimal inference example |
pyproject.toml |
Pinned runtime dependencies for example.py, resolved with uv |
uv.lock |
Locked dependency resolution for pyproject.toml |
config.yaml |
Model I/O contract used by the example |
benchmarks/ |
FP32 baseline and Arm-optimized benchmark records |
Performance
Performance was measured on the reference configuration below. Results are intended to make the optimization reproducible but do not guarantee identical performance on every Arm-based system.
Reference configuration
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Device / platform | Raspberry Pi 5 |
| CPU | Cortex-A76, 4 cores @ 2.4 GHz |
| System memory | 8 GB |
| OS | Linux, Raspberry Pi OS 64-bit, based on Debian 13 "Trixie" |
| Runtime | ExecuTorch 1.1.0 |
| Execution backend | CPU, 1 thread (XNNPACK, KleidiAI) |
| Precision | INT8, static PTQ — per-channel symmetric weights, per-tensor symmetric activations |
| Batch size | 1 |
| Input resolution | 640x640 |
| Runs / warmup | 100 / 10 |
Performance results
| Metric | Original / baseline | Arm-optimized | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model size (MB) | 146.492 | 40.836 | 3.59x smaller |
| End-to-end latency p50 (ms) | 5046.218 | 1880.522 | 2.68x faster |
| End-to-end latency p90 (ms) | 5051.159 | 1883.469 | 2.68x faster |
| Model load time (ms) | 300.261 | 91.748 | 3.27x faster |
| Time to first inference (ms) | 5870.043 | 1944.384 | 3.02x faster |
| Peak memory (MB) | 520.83 | 277.69 | 1.88x less |
| Average memory (MB) | 519.98 | 276.53 | 1.88x less |
| Frames per second | 0.20 | 0.53 | 2.65x |
Accuracy
Accuracy was evaluated using the same preprocessing, input resolution, and evaluation protocol described below. Where possible, the optimized model is compared against the original model under the same evaluation conditions.
Evaluation setup
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Dataset | COCO 2017 |
| Split | val2017 |
| Sample count | 5000 |
| Metric(s) | Segm mAP@0.5, Segm mAP@0.75, Segm mAP@0.5:0.95 |
| Runtime | ExecuTorch 1.1.0 (CPU, XNNPACK, KleidiAI) |
Accuracy results
| Metric | Original / baseline | Arm-optimized | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Segm mAP@0.5 (%) | 63.83 | 63.55 | -0.28 pp |
| Segm mAP@0.75 (%) | 42.35 | 42.40 | +0.05 pp |
| Segm mAP@0.5:0.95 (%) | 40.17 | 40.09 | -0.08 pp |
Accuracy was measured using the evaluation setup described above. Users should re-evaluate the model on their own data before production use.
Arm optimization approach
Arm optimized this model for efficient inference on Arm-based platforms using a hardware-aware conversion and validation flow.
For this release, Arm used:
| Optimization area | Applied? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Model conversion | Yes | Converted to ExecuTorch .pte via torch.export, followed by PT2E capture/prepare/convert and XNNPACK lowering |
| Quantization | Yes | INT8 static PTQ — per-channel symmetric weights, per-tensor symmetric activations; calibrated on 2,000 COCO 2017 images; the segmentation head was kept in FP32 except for proto.cv2, while the first convolution was also kept in FP32 |
| Runtime/backend selection | Yes | XNNPACK + KleidiAI delegate |
| Graph/runtime compatibility updates | Yes | Performed as part of the ExecuTorch export pipeline |
| Accuracy validation | Yes | Compared against the original model or published baseline |
| Performance validation | Yes | Measured on the reference Arm platform |
The goal of this process is to improve deployment characteristics such as latency, memory use, model size, and runtime compatibility while preserving the model's intended behavior. Detailed conversion scripts, calibration configuration, or backend-specific implementation details may be provided separately where appropriate.
Using this model
Install dependencies
Dependencies are declared in pyproject.toml, which ships with this repository. Resolve and install them into a local virtual environment with uv:
uv python install
uv sync --frozen
Run the example
uv run example.py
Expected input
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Shape | [1, 3, 640, 640] |
| Dtype | float32 |
| Range | [0.0, 1.0] |
| Preprocessing | letterbox to 640x640 (pad value 114, no scale-up, centered), to tensor — no ImageNet normalization, the model expects raw [0, 1] values |
Expected output
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Shape | [1, 117N + 32160*160 + 4] |
| Format | Single flattened tensor combining detection predictions ([1, 117, N]: 4 box coordinates + 1 objectness + 80 class scores + 32 mask coefficients) and mask prototypes ([1, 32, 160, 160]); the trailing 4 values are a metadata tail that is unreliable under INT8 quantization |
| Postprocessing | score = objectness sigmoid times class score sigmoid, confidence threshold 0.4, IoU threshold 0.45, max 300 detections, boxes in xyxy mapped back to original image coordinates; masks = sigmoid(coefficients times prototype masks), cropped to box, thresholded at 0.5, mapped back to original image coordinates |
Intended use
This model is intended for developers evaluating instance segmentation workloads on Arm-based platforms. It is suitable as a reference implementation for benchmarking, prototyping, and integration exploration.
Limitations
- Evaluated on 5,000 images from COCO 2017 val2017 (the standard validation split, not the full dataset)
- Fixed input size of 640x640, letterboxed — very small or extreme-aspect-ratio images are padded rather than distorted, but still lose resolution relative to native size
- The confidence threshold (0.4) and IoU threshold (0.45) used by
example.pywere selected so that inference results are visually clear during human validation - Performance measurements are from Raspberry Pi 5 hardware; results may differ on other Arm devices
- This repository is not a replacement for the original model documentation
Additional notes
The segmentation head (ISegment, model.105) is kept in FP32, except for its self-contained proto.cv2 Conv-BN-SiLU block, which is quantized: the head mixes pixel-scale box coordinates, a 0-1 sigmoid range for objectness and class scores, and mask coefficients in one output tensor, so a single per-tensor scale would crush the small-range channels. The first convolution is also kept in FP32 as the input-quantization boundary. Calibration used 2,000 randomly selected images from COCO 2017.
- Sample input:
sample_input.jpgis derived from Living room (Unsplash) by Jarosław Ceborski, via Wikimedia Commons (CC0 1.0).
About this version
Original Model: yolov7-seg by YOLOv7 (Chien-Yao Wang, Alexey Bochkovskiy and Hong-Yuan Mark Liao) - Repository
Optimization/conversion: Arm-Optimized version for execution on Arm-based platforms.
Converted/optimized by: Arm
License: The Original Model and the Optimized Model are subject to GPL-3.0.
This repository contains a converted or optimized version of the Original Model (the “Optimized Model”). The Original Model has been converted or optimized as described above for execution on Arm-based platforms.
No retraining or fine-tuning of the Original Model was performed as part of the conversion or optimization. The conversion or optimization was not intended to change the Original Model’s behavior or intended use.
Original Model and Documentation
For information about the Original Model, including its development, training data, intended uses, limitations and other relevant information, please refer to the Original Model repository. Information in that repository was provided by the original developer or other third parties and, unless expressly stated otherwise, has not been independently verified by Arm.
Licenses and Third-Party Terms
Use of the Original Model and the Optimized Model is subject to the applicable licenses, usage restrictions and other terms identified above and in the relevant repositories. Publication of the Optimized Model does not grant any rights beyond those provided under the applicable license terms.
You are responsible for reviewing those terms and ensuring that your use of the Original Model and the Optimized Model is permitted.
Purpose of this Release
The Optimized Model is provided as a reference implementation to demonstrate and evaluate execution and performance on Arm-based systems. It is not a production-ready or supported solution.
Arm’s publication of the Optimized Model does not constitute an endorsement or certification of the Original Model or a representation that the Optimized Model is suitable for production use or any particular purpose.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law (i) the Optimized Model is provided “as is.” Arm makes no representations or warranties that the Original Model, the Optimized Model or their outputs are accurate, safe, secure, non-infringing, legally compliant, suitable for production use or fit for any particular purpose; and (ii) Arm will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from or in connection with the Optimized Model, its use or its outputs.
You are responsible for independently evaluating the Optimized Model, its outputs and its suitability for your intended use, including compliance with applicable legal, regulatory, safety and security requirements.
Arm does not commit to provide ongoing support, maintenance or updates for the Optimized Model. Any use of or reliance on the Optimized Model or its outputs is at your own risk.
- Downloads last month
- 15