Back to all models
fill-mask mask_token: <mask>
Query this model
πŸ”₯ This model is currently loaded and running on the Inference API. ⚠️ This model could not be loaded by the inference API. ⚠️ This model can be loaded on the Inference API on-demand.
JSON Output
API endpoint  

⚑️ Upgrade your account to access the Inference API

Share Copied link to clipboard

Monthly model downloads

pdelobelle/robbert-v2-dutch-base pdelobelle/robbert-v2-dutch-base
last 30 days



Contributed by

pdelobelle Pieter Delobelle
3 models

How to use this model directly from the πŸ€—/transformers library:

Copy to clipboard
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForMaskedLM tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("pdelobelle/robbert-v2-dutch-base") model = AutoModelForMaskedLM.from_pretrained("pdelobelle/robbert-v2-dutch-base")


Model description

RobBERT v2 is a Dutch state-of-the-art RoBERTa-based language model.

More detailled information can be found in the RobBERT paper.

How to use

from transformers import RobertaTokenizer, RobertaForSequenceClassification
tokenizer = RobertaTokenizer.from_pretrained("pdelobelle/robbert-v2-dutch-base")
model = RobertaForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained("pdelobelle/robbert-v2-dutch-base")

Performance Evaluation Results

All experiments are described in more detail in our paper.

Sentiment analysis

Predicting whether a review is positive or negative using the Dutch Book Reviews Dataset.

Model Accuracy [%]
ULMFiT 93.8
BERTje 93.0
RobBERT v2 95.1

Die/Dat (coreference resolution)

We measured how well the models are able to do coreference resolution by predicting whether "die" or "dat" should be filled into a sentence. For this, we used the EuroParl corpus.

Finetuning on whole dataset

Model Accuracy [%] F1 [%]
Baseline (LSTM) 75.03
mBERT 98.285 98.033
BERTje 98.268 98.014
RobBERT v2 99.232 99.121

Finetuning on 10K examples

We also measured the performance using only 10K training examples. This experiment clearly illustrates that RobBERT outperforms other models when there is little data available.

Model Accuracy [%] F1 [%]
mBERT 92.157 90.898
BERTje 93.096 91.279
RobBERT v2 97.816 97.514

Using zero-shot word masking task

Since BERT models are pre-trained using the word masking task, we can use this to predict whether "die" or "dat" is more likely. This experiment shows that RobBERT has internalised more information about Dutch than other models.

Model Accuracy [%]
ZeroR 66.70
mBERT 90.21
BERTje 94.94
RobBERT v2 98.75

Part-of-Speech Tagging.

Using the Lassy UD dataset.

Model Accuracy [%]
Frog 91.7
mBERT 96.5
BERTje 96.3
RobBERT v2 96.4

Interestingly, we found that when dealing with small data sets, RobBERT v2 significantly outperforms other models.

RobBERT's performance on smaller datasets

Named Entity Recognition

Using the CoNLL 2002 evaluation script.

Model Accuracy [%]
Frog 57.31
mBERT 90.94
BERT-NL 89.7
BERTje 88.3
RobBERT v2 89.08

Training procedure

We pre-trained RobBERT using the RoBERTa training regime. We pre-trained our model on the Dutch section of the OSCAR corpus, a large multilingual corpus which was obtained by language classification in the Common Crawl corpus. This Dutch corpus is 39GB large, with 6.6 billion words spread over 126 million lines of text, where each line could contain multiple sentences, thus using more data than concurrently developed Dutch BERT models.

RobBERT shares its architecture with RoBERTa's base model, which itself is a replication and improvement over BERT. Like BERT, it's architecture consists of 12 self-attention layers with 12 heads with 117M trainable parameters. One difference with the original BERT model is due to the different pre-training task specified by RoBERTa, using only the MLM task and not the NSP task. During pre-training, it thus only predicts which words are masked in certain positions of given sentences. The training process uses the Adam optimizer with polynomial decay of the learning rate l_r=10^-6 and a ramp-up period of 1000 iterations, with hyperparameters beta_1=0.9 and RoBERTa's default beta_2=0.98. Additionally, a weight decay of 0.1 and a small dropout of 0.1 helps prevent the model from overfitting.

RobBERT was trained on a computing cluster with 4 Nvidia P100 GPUs per node, where the number of nodes was dynamically adjusted while keeping a fixed batch size of 8192 sentences. At most 20 nodes were used (i.e. 80 GPUs), and the median was 5 nodes. By using gradient accumulation, the batch size could be set independently of the number of GPUs available, in order to maximally utilize the cluster. Using the Fairseq library, the model trained for two epochs, which equals over 16k batches in total, which took about three days on the computing cluster. In between training jobs on the computing cluster, 2 Nvidia 1080 Ti's also covered some parameter updates for RobBERT v2.

Limitations and bias

In the RobBERT paper, we also investigated potential sources of bias in RobBERT.

We found that the zeroshot model estimates the probability of hij (he) to be higher than zij (she) for most occupations in bleached template sentences, regardless of their actual job gender ratio in reality.

RobBERT's performance on smaller datasets

By augmenting the DBRB Dutch Book sentiment analysis dataset with the stated gender of the author of the review, we found that highly positive reviews written by women were generally more accurately detected by RobBERT as being positive than those written by men.

RobBERT's performance on smaller datasets

BibTeX entry and citation info

    title={RobBERT: a Dutch RoBERTa-based Language Model},
    author={Pieter Delobelle and Thomas Winters and Bettina Berendt},