Papers
arxiv:2609.09657

RESCUE-BENCH: Towards Relation-Aware Multi-Party Emotional Support Conversation Systems

Published on Sep 9
· Submitted by
tomsawyer
on Sep 10
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

This work introduces a benchmark for evaluating whether large language models can understand evolving interpersonal dynamics to provide effective emotional support in multi-party settings.

Existing emotional support conversation systems mainly focus on one-on-one seeker-supporter interactions and individual emotional states, leaving interpersonal relations in multi-party scenarios underexplored. In this work, we introduce relation-aware emotional support conversation, a new task that evaluates whether LLMs can capture and utilize the evolving dynamics of relationships to offer more effective emotional support. We construct RESCUE (Relation-aware Emotional Support Conversation Understanding and Evaluation Benchmark) from real couple and family interview conversations, containing 191 samples, 7,079 annotated turns, and 1,064.8 minutes of video. Based on rich annotations of socio-emotional and support-related dynamics, RESCUE defines six tasks that evaluate two core capabilities required for relation-aware emotional support: Relational Understanding and Relation-Sensitive Support. Experiments with ten LLMs show that current models perform relatively well on tasks relying on local emotional or intervention cues, but struggle with relation-intensive tasks such as relation pattern prediction, viewpoint prediction, and support strategy prediction. These findings reveal the limitations of current LLMs in modeling interpersonal relations and making relation-sensitive support decisions.

Community

Paper submitter

This paper introduces RESCUE-BENCH, a benchmark for studying relation-aware emotional support in multi-party conversations, an aspect largely overlooked by existing emotional support systems. The authors construct RESCUE from real couple and family interviews, containing 191 samples, 7,079 annotated turns, and 1,064.8 minutes of video. It defines six tasks covering two core capabilities: Relational Understanding and Relation-Sensitive Support. Experiments with 10 LLMs show that current models perform reasonably well on local emotional and intervention cues, but struggle with tasks requiring deeper reasoning about evolving interpersonal relationships, such as relationship-pattern prediction, viewpoint prediction, and support-strategy prediction. The results suggest that effective emotional support in multi-party settings requires models to explicitly capture and utilize dynamic relational information rather than focusing only on individual emotional states.

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2609.09657
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.09657 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.09657 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.09657 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.