DriveDNA: A Large-Scale Multimodal Naturalistic Driving Dataset and Benchmark for Driving Style Identification
Abstract
Driving style captures stable, driver-specific patterns in how a vehicle is driven. In naturalistic data, however, this signal is hard to isolate because drivers are observed in different vehicles, on different roads, and under different conditions, so models may mistake vehicle- or situation-specific regularities for driver-specific style. We introduce DriveDNA, a large-scale naturalistic dataset and benchmark for personalized driving-style modeling, comprising 4,121 drives from 465 drivers across 115 vehicle models and totaling 975 hours of human-controlled driving at 10 Hz with forward video, collected from community drivers in everyday use. DriveDNA defines driving style as a consistent, driver-specific behavioral pattern in how a vehicle moves under similar conditions. The benchmark evaluates this signal through three core tasks: few-shot driver re-identification, personalized behavior prediction, and condition-matched comparison, and provides behavioral annotations plus 276,248 rule-generated maneuver events across six classes with large-scale human auditing. We evaluate baselines spanning classical descriptors, supervised and self-supervised time-series encoders, multimodal fusion, probabilistic prediction, and zero-shot foundation models under a fixed multi-seed protocol. Learned representations substantially outperform classical descriptors on unseen drivers (AUROC .935 vs. .707) and retain driver-specific information under matched driving conditions, while descriptor performance approaches chance. Video-only models achieve comparable re-identification accuracy but exhibit severe route leakage, showing that strong recognition may arise from contextual shortcuts rather than driving behavior. These findings show that reliable driving-style evaluation must assess both the behavioral value of learned representations and their robustness to vehicle, drive, and condition confounds.
Community
Hi, author here ๐
TL;DR: Recognizing a driver is not the same as capturing driving style. DriveDNA is a large-scale naturalistic driving benchmark (465 drivers, 115 vehicle models, 975 h of human-controlled driving with CAN + forward video) built around one question: does a model recognize how a person drives โ or merely which car they own, which roads they frequent, and which conditions they encounter?
Highlights:
๐งฌ Learned representations reach AUROC .935 on unseen drivers vs .707 for classical descriptors, and retain .811 under condition-matched evaluation while descriptors collapse to chance.
๐ฅ A video-only model matches CAN at re-identification (.937) โ but predicts the route at 347ร chance and collapses to .675 once conditions are matched. Strong recognition can be pure shortcut.
๐ 30 baseline configurations under one frozen multi-seed protocol, with leakage probes shipped as part of the benchmark: report utility and leakage.
Dataset & evaluation harness (public tier reproduces every number in the paper):
๐ https://huggingface.co/datasets/HenryYHW/DriveDNA
Happy to answer questions!
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2607.23822 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 1
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper