Papers
arxiv:2607.20982

GuardianAgentBench: Where Agents Fail and How to Guard Them

Published on Jul 23
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

As large language model agents increasingly operate autonomously with access to tools and external environments, ensuring their safe and reliable behavior becomes critical. We present GuardianAgentBench (GABench), a benchmark of 580 scenarios across six domains evaluated on three production-ready frameworks: LangChain, LlamaIndex, and Vectara. The benchmark incorporates rigorous multi-stage validation and five adversarial attack modes. Experiments with six state-of-the-art models reveal that even the strongest configuration achieves only 74.8% overall accuracy and expose two distinct failure regimes: stronger models under-call required tools, while weaker models mis-select and over-call tools. Performance degrades monotonically with both tool-set size and sequential turn depth, with long-horizon planning proving the steeper bottleneck. Our guardrail implementation consistently outperforms system-prompt-based defenses across all models, recovering 19.9% of failures at a false positive rate of just 0.5%. These results demonstrate that execution-time structural intervention improves safety without disrupting correct agent behavior.

Community

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2607.20982
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.20982 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.20982 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.20982 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.