instruct stringclasses 1
value | input stringlengths 25 4.64k | output stringlengths 17 413 |
|---|---|---|
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma fconverseE[elim!]:
assumes "x \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> r\<inverse>\<^sub>\<bullet>"
obtains a b where "x = [b, a]\<^sub>\<circ>" and "[a, b]\<^sub>\<circ> \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> r" | using assms unfolding fconverse_def
by auto |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma fpairsD[dest]:
assumes "x \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> fpairs r"
shows "x \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> r" and "\<exists>a b. x = [a, b]\<^sub>\<circ>" | using assms unfolding fpairs_def
by auto |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma fun_dual5: "(f = \<partial> \<circ> g \<circ> \<partial>) = (\<partial> \<circ> f \<circ> \<partial> = g)" | by (metis comp_assoc fun_dual1 fun_dual2) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma Ord_vsubset_Vset_succ[V_cs_intros]:
assumes "Ord \<alpha>" and "B \<subseteq>\<^sub>\<circ> Vset \<alpha>"
shows "B \<subseteq>\<^sub>\<circ> Vset (succ \<alpha>)" | by (intro vsubsetI) (auto simp: assms Vset_trans Ord_vsubset_in_Vset_succI) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma vsv_vimageI1:
assumes "a \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> \<D>\<^sub>\<circ> r" and "a \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> A"
shows "r\<lparr>a\<rparr> \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> r `\<^sub>\<circ> A" | using assms
by (simp add: vsv_vimage_eqI) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma vsv_vlrestriction_vinsert:
assumes "a \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> \<D>\<^sub>\<circ> r"
shows "r \<restriction>\<^sup>l\<^sub>\<circ> vinsert a A = vinsert \<langle>a, r\<lparr>a\<rparr>\<rangle> (r \<restriction>\<^sup>l\<^sub>\<circ> A)" | using assms
by (auto intro!: vsubset_antisym) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma dg_prod_vdiff_vunion_Obj_in_Obj:
assumes "J \<subseteq>\<^sub>\<circ> I"
and "b \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> (\<Prod>\<^sub>D\<^sub>Gk\<in>\<^sub>\<circ>I -\<^sub>\<circ> J. \<AA> k)\<lparr>Obj\<rparr>"
and "c \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> (\<Prod>\<^sub>D\<^sub>Gj\<in>\<^sub>\<circ>J. \<AA> j)\<lparr>Obj\<rparr>"
show... | by ( vdiff_of_vunion rule: dg_prod_vunion_Obj_in_Obj assms: assms(2,3) subset: assms(1) ) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma vimage_eq_imp_vcomp:
assumes "r `\<^sub>\<circ> A = s `\<^sub>\<circ> B"
shows "(t \<circ>\<^sub>\<circ> r) `\<^sub>\<circ> A = (t \<circ>\<^sub>\<circ> s) `\<^sub>\<circ> B" | using assms
by (metis vcomp_vimage) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma vifintersectionE2[elim]:
assumes "a \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> (\<Inter>\<^sub>\<circ>i\<in>\<^sub>\<circ>I. f i)"
obtains i where "i \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> I" and "a \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> f i" | using assms
by (elim vifintersectionE3) (meson assms VInterE2 app_vimageE) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma fconst_onE[elim!]:
assumes "x \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> fconst_on A c"
obtains a where "a \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> A" and "x = [a, c]\<^sub>\<circ>" | using assms unfolding fconst_on_def
by auto |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma frestrictionI[intro!]:
assumes "a \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> A" and "b \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> A" and "[a, b]\<^sub>\<circ> \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> r"
shows "[a, b]\<^sub>\<circ> \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> r \<restriction>\<^sub>\<bullet> A" | using assms unfolding frestriction_def
by simp |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma vsv_vimage_eqI[intro]:
assumes "a \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> \<D>\<^sub>\<circ> r" and "r\<lparr>a\<rparr> = b" and "a \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> A"
shows "b \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> r `\<^sub>\<circ> A" | using assms(2)[unfolded vsv_ex1_app2[OF assms(1)]] assms(3)
by auto |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma fimageI1:
assumes "x \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> \<R>\<^sub>\<bullet> (r \<restriction>\<^sup>l\<^sub>\<bullet> A)"
shows "x \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> r `\<^sub>\<bullet> A" | using assms unfolding fimage_def
by simp |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma vrat_mult_closed:
assumes "x \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> \<rat>\<^sub>\<circ>" and "y \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> \<rat>\<^sub>\<circ>"
shows "x *\<^sub>\<rat> y \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> \<rat>\<^sub>\<circ>" | proof- have "(x'::rat) * y' \<in> UNIV" for x' y'
by simp from this[untransferred, OF assms] show ?thesis .
qed |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma vrange_VLambda: "\<R>\<^sub>\<circ> (\<lambda>a\<in>\<^sub>\<circ>A. f a) = set (f ` elts A)" | by (intro vsubset_antisym vsubsetI) auto |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma vrat_assoc_law_multiplication:
assumes "x \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> \<rat>\<^sub>\<circ>" and "y \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> \<rat>\<^sub>\<circ>" and "z \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> \<rat>\<^sub>\<circ>"
shows "(x *\<^sub>\<rat> y) *\<^sub>\<rat> z = x *\<^sub>\<rat> (y *\<^sub>\<rat> z)" | proof- have "(x' * y') * z' = x' * (y' * z')" for x' y' z' :: rat
by simp from this[untransferred, OF assms] show ?thesis .
qed |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma vimage_VLambda_vrange: "(\<lambda>a\<in>\<^sub>\<circ>A. f a) `\<^sub>\<circ> B = \<R>\<^sub>\<circ> (\<lambda>a\<in>\<^sub>\<circ>A \<inter>\<^sub>\<circ> B. f a)" | unfolding vimage_def
by (simp add: vlrestriction_VLambda) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma vrestriction_atE2[elim]:
assumes "x \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> r \<restriction>\<^sub>\<circ> A"
obtains a b where "x = \<langle>a, b\<rangle>" and "a \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> A" and "b \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> A" and "r\<lparr>a\<rparr> = b" | using assms unfolding vrestriction_def
by clarsimp |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma vint_mult_closed:
assumes "x \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> \<int>\<^sub>\<circ>" and "y \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> \<int>\<^sub>\<circ>"
shows "x *\<^sub>\<int> y \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> \<int>\<^sub>\<circ>" | proof- have "(x'::int) * y' \<in> UNIV" for x' y'
by simp from this[untransferred, OF assms] show ?thesis .
qed |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma app_vimageE[elim]:
assumes "b \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> r `\<^sub>\<circ> A"
obtains a where "\<langle>a, b\<rangle> \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> r" and "a \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> A" | using assms unfolding vimage_def
by auto |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma v11_vconverse_app_in_vdomain:
assumes "y \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> \<R>\<^sub>\<circ> r"
shows "r\<inverse>\<^sub>\<circ>\<lparr>y\<rparr> \<in>\<^sub>\<circ> \<D>\<^sub>\<circ> r" | using assms v11_vconverse unfolding vrange_vconverse[symmetric]
by (auto simp: v11_def) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma drop_suffix_hd_css_step'':
assumes step: "\<Gamma>\<turnstile> (p#ps@cs,css,s) \<rightarrow> (cs',(pnorm@cs,pabr@cs)#css,t)"
shows "\<Gamma>\<turnstile> (p#ps,css,s) \<rightarrow> (cs',(pnorm,pabr)#css,t)" | using drop_suffix_hd_css_step' [OF step]
by auto |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma mset_subst_cls_list_subst_cls_mset: "mset (Cs \<cdot>cl \<sigma>) = (mset Cs) \<cdot>cm \<sigma>" | unfolding subst_cls_mset_def subst_cls_list_def
by auto |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma cs_length_g_one: assumes \<open>length (cs\<^bsup>\<pi>\<^esup> i) \<noteq> 1\<close> obtains k where \<open>cs\<^bsup>\<pi>\<^esup> i = (cs\<^bsup>\<pi>\<^esup> k)@[\<pi> i]\<close> and \<open>i icd\<^bsup>\<pi>\<^esup>\<rightarrow> k\<close> | apply (cases \<open>i\<close> \<open>\<pi>\<close> rule: cs_cases)
using assms cs_not_nil
by auto |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma preprocess'_Tableau_Poly_Mapping_Some': "(Poly_Mapping (preprocess' cs start)) p = Some v
\<Longrightarrow> \<exists> h. poly h = p \<and> \<not> is_monom (poly h) \<and> qdelta_constraint_to_atom h v \<in> flat (set (Atoms (preprocess' cs start)))" | by (induct cs start rule: preprocess'.induct, auto simp: Let_def split: option.splits if_splits) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma length_locss:
"i < length cs
\<Longrightarrow> length (locss P cs loc ! (length cs - Suc i)) =
locLength P (fst(cs ! (length cs - Suc i)))
(fst(snd(cs ! (length cs - Suc i))))
(snd(snd(cs ! (length cs - Suc i))))" | apply (induct cs, auto)
apply (case_tac "i = length cs")
by (auto simp: nth_Cons') |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma size_jump2: "size (jump l cs) < size cs \<or> jump l cs = cs" | apply(induct cs)
apply simp
apply(case_tac a)
apply auto done |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma fps_XDp_foldr_nth [simp]: "foldr (\<lambda>c r. fps_XDp c \<circ> r) cs (\<lambda>c. fps_XDp c a) c0 $ n =
foldr (\<lambda>c r. (c + of_nat n) * r) cs (c0 + of_nat n) * a$n" | by (induct cs arbitrary: c0) (simp_all add: algebra_simps) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma weakBisimCasePushRes:
fixes x :: name
and \<Psi> :: 'b
and Cs :: "('c \<times> ('a, 'b, 'c) psi) list"
assumes "x \<sharp> \<Psi>"
and "x \<sharp> (map fst Cs)"
shows "\<Psi> \<rhd> \<lparr>\<nu>x\<rparr>(Cases Cs) \<approx> Cases(map (\<lambda>(\<phi>, P). (\<phi>, \<lparr>\<nu>x\<rparr>P... | using assms
by(metis bisimCasePushRes strongBisimWeakBisim) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma non_strict_constr_no_LTPP:
assumes "nonstrict_constrs cs"
shows "\<forall>x \<in> set cs. \<not>(\<exists>a b. LTPP a b = x)" | using assms nonstrict_constr.simps(9)
by blast |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma SubobjsR_subclassRep:
"Subobjs\<^sub>R P C Cs \<Longrightarrow> (C,last Cs) \<in> (subclsR P)\<^sup>*" | apply(erule Subobjs\<^sub>R.induct)
apply simp
apply(simp add: SubobjsR_nonempty) done |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma same_level_path_aux_Append:
"\<lbrakk>same_level_path_aux cs as; same_level_path_aux (upd_cs cs as) as'\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> same_level_path_aux cs (as@as')" | by(induct rule:slpa_induct,auto simp:intra_kind_def) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma class_leq_refl[iff]: "class_ex cs c \<Longrightarrow> class_leq cs c c" | using wf
by (simp add: class_leq_def class_ex_def refl_on_def) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma min_gallery_least_length:
assumes "chamber C" "chamber D" "C\<noteq>D"
defines "Cs \<equiv> ARG_MIN length Cs. gallery (C#Cs@[D])"
shows "min_gallery (C#Cs@[D])" | unfolding Cs_def
using assms gallery_least_length
by (blast intro: min_galleryI_betw arg_min_nat_le) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma remdups_clss_Nil_iff: "remdups_clss Cs = [] \<longleftrightarrow> Cs = []" | by (cases Cs, simp, hypsubst, subst remdups_clss.simps(2), simp add: Let_def) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma sort_eqv_trans: "sort_eqv cs x y \<Longrightarrow> sort_eqv cs y z \<Longrightarrow> sort_eqv cs x z" | using sort_eqv_def sort_leq_trans
by blast |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma valid_path_aux_intra_path:
"\<forall>a \<in> set as. intra_kind(kind a) \<Longrightarrow> valid_path_aux cs as" | by(induct as,auto simp:intra_kind_def) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma presSwap_fromIMor[simp]:
"ipresCons h hA (fromMOD MOD) \<Longrightarrow> ipresSwap h (fromMOD MOD)
\<Longrightarrow> presSwap (fromIMor h) MOD" | unfolding ipresSwap_def presSwap_def
by simp |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma ipresIGFreshAll_termMOD[simp]:
"ipresIGFreshAll h hA termMOD MOD = ipresFreshAll h hA MOD" | unfolding ipresIGFreshAll_def ipresFreshAll_def
by simp |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma fromIMor_termFSwSbMorph[simp]:
assumes "termFSwSbImorph h hA (fromMOD MOD)"
shows "termFSwSbMorph (fromIMor h) (fromIMorAbs hA) MOD" | using assms unfolding termFSwSbImorph_defs1
using assms unfolding termFSwSbImorph_def termFSwSbMorph_def
by simp |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma errMOD_igWlsAbsDisj:
assumes "igWlsAbsDisj MOD"
shows "igWlsAbsDisj (errMOD MOD)" | using assms unfolding errMOD_def igWlsAbsDisj_def
apply clarify subgoal for _ _ _ _ A
by(cases A) fastforce+ . |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma imp_igSubstInpIPresIGWlsInpSTR:
"igSubstIPresIGWlsSTR MOD \<Longrightarrow> igSubstInpIPresIGWlsInpSTR MOD" | by(simp add: igSubstInpIPresIGWlsInpSTR_def igSubstIPresIGWlsSTR_def igSubstInp_def igWlsInp_def liftAll2_def lift_def sameDom_def split: option.splits) (smt option.distinct(1) option.exhaust) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma comp_ipresIGWlsAll:
assumes "ipresIGWlsAll h hA MOD MOD'" and "ipresIGWlsAll h' hA' MOD' MOD''"
shows "ipresIGWlsAll (h' o h) (hA' o hA) MOD MOD''" | using assms unfolding ipresIGWlsAll_def
using comp_ipresIGWls comp_ipresIGWlsAbs
by auto |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma igFreshIGVar_fromMOD[simp]:
"gFreshGVar MOD \<Longrightarrow> igFreshIGVar (fromMOD MOD)" | unfolding igFreshIGVar_def gFreshGVar_def
by simp |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma ipresCons_imp_ipresSubstAll:
assumes *: "ipresCons h hA MOD" and **: "igSubstCls MOD"
and "igConsIPresIGWls MOD" and "igFreshCls MOD"
shows "ipresSubstAll h hA MOD" | unfolding ipresSubstAll_def
using assms ipresCons_imp_ipresSubst ipresCons_imp_ipresSubstAbs
by auto |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma igSubstAllIPresIGWlsAllSTR_imp_igSubstAllIPresIGWlsAll:
"igSubstAllIPresIGWlsAllSTR MOD \<Longrightarrow> igSubstAllIPresIGWlsAll MOD" | unfolding igSubstAllIPresIGWlsAllSTR_def igSubstAllIPresIGWlsAll_def
using igSubstIPresIGWlsSTR_imp_igSubstIPresIGWls igSubstAbsIPresIGWlsAbsSTR_imp_igSubstAbsIPresIGWlsAbs
by auto |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | theorem wlsFSwSb_recAll_unique_presCons:
assumes "wlsFSwSb MOD" and "presCons h hA MOD"
shows "(wls s X \<longrightarrow> h X = rec MOD X) \<and>
(wlsAbs (us,s') A \<longrightarrow> hA A = recAbs MOD A)" | using assms wlsFSw_recAll_unique_presCons unfolding wlsFSwSb_def
by blast |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma
"(0::nat) mod 0 = 0"
"(x::nat) mod 0 = x"
"(0::nat) mod 1 = 0"
"(1::nat) mod 1 = 0"
"(3::nat) mod 1 = 0"
"(x::nat) mod 1 = 0"
"(0::nat) mod 3 = 0"
"(1::nat) mod 3 = 1"
"(3::nat) mod 3 = 0"
"x mod 3 < 3"
"(x mod 3 = x) = (x < 3)" | using [[z3_extensions]]
by smt+ |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma errMOD_igWlsAllDisj:
assumes "igWlsAllDisj MOD"
shows "igWlsAllDisj (errMOD MOD)" | using assms unfolding igWlsAllDisj_def
using errMOD_igWlsDisj errMOD_igWlsAbsDisj
by auto |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma iwlsFSbSw_fromMOD[simp]:
"wlsFSbSw MOD \<Longrightarrow> iwlsFSbSw (fromMOD MOD)" | unfolding iwlsFSbSw_def wlsFSbSw_def
by simp |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma sub_diff_mod_eq': "
r \<le> t \<Longrightarrow> (k * m + t - (t - r) mod m) mod (m::nat) = r mod m" | apply (simp only: diff_mod_le[of t r m, THEN add_diff_assoc, symmetric])
apply (simp add: sub_diff_mod_eq) done |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma not_SN_onI[intro]: "f 0 \<in> X \<Longrightarrow> chain R f \<Longrightarrow> \<not> SN_on R X" | by (unfold SN_on_def not_not, intro exI conjI) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma non_empty_cycle_root_loop_converse:
assumes "non_empty_cycle_root r x"
shows "r \<le> x\<^sup>+;r" | using assms less_eq_def non_empty_cycle_root_rtc_tc
by fastforce |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma "(0::real) < 1 + x\<^sup>2" | by (sos "((R<1 + ((R<1 * (R<1 * [x]^2)) + ((A<=0 * R<1) * (R<1 * [1]^2)))))") |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma oprod_Well_order:
assumes WELL: "Well_order r" and WELL': "Well_order r'"
shows "Well_order (r *o r')" | proof- have "Total r \<and> Total r'"
using WELL WELL'
by (auto simp add: order_on_defs) thus ?thesis
using assms unfolding well_order_on_def
using oprod_Linear_order oprod_wf_Id
by blast
qed |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma subset_AboveS_UnderS: "B \<le> Field r \<Longrightarrow> B \<le> AboveS r (UnderS r B)" | by(auto simp add: AboveS_def UnderS_def) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma per_add_exp: assumes "u \<le>p r\<^sup>\<omega>" and "m \<noteq> 0" shows "u \<le>p (r\<^sup>@m)\<^sup>\<omega>" | using per_exp_pref[OF per_rootD, OF \<open>u \<le>p r\<^sup>\<omega>\<close>, of m] per_rootD'[OF \<open>u \<le>p r\<^sup>\<omega>\<close>, folded nonzero_pow_emp[OF \<open>m \<noteq> 0\<close>, of r]] unfolding period_root_def .. |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma coprimeI:
assumes "\<And>r. r dvd p \<Longrightarrow> r dvd q \<Longrightarrow> r dvd 1"
shows "coprime p q" | using assms
by (auto simp: coprime_def') |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma li_minus:
assumes "locally_irrefl R A"
shows "locally_irrefl R (A - B)" | using assms unfolding locally_irrefl_def
by (meson in_diffD) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma SN_on_Image_rtrancl_conv:
"SN_on r A \<longleftrightarrow> SN_on r (r\<^sup>* `` A)" (is "?L \<longleftrightarrow> ?R") | proof assume ?L then show ?R
by (auto simp: SN_on_Image_rtrancl) next assume ?R then show ?L
by (auto simp: SN_on_def)
qed |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma oprod_Preorder: "\<lbrakk>Preorder r; Preorder r'; antisym r; antisym r'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Preorder (r *o r')" | unfolding preorder_on_def
using oprod_Refl oprod_trans
by blast |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma pj_invim_mono1:"\<lbrakk>Ring R; ideal R I; ideal (qring R I) J1;
ideal (qring R I) J2; J1 \<subseteq> J2 \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
(rInvim R (qring R I) (pj R I) J1) \<subseteq> (rInvim R (qring R I) (pj R I) J2)" | apply (rule subsetI)
apply (simp add:rInvim_def)
apply (simp add:subsetD) done |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma rrsmult_supp : "supp (r \<currency> f) \<subseteq> R" | using rightreg_scalar_multD2 suppD_contra
by force |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma False_step_conc[iff]:
"\<And>L R. (False#p,q) : step (conc L R) a =
(\<exists>r. q = False#r \<and> (p,r) : step R a)" | apply (simp add:conc_def step_def)
apply blast done |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma r2f_ad_rel_hom: "\<F> (ad_rel R) = kad (\<F> R)" | by (force simp add: kad_def ad_rel_def r2f_def fun_eq_iff) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma abs_trans[trans]:
assumes A: "\<Up>R C \<le> B" and B: "\<Up>R' B \<le> A"
shows "\<Up>R' (\<Up>R C) \<le> A" | using assms
by (fastforce simp: pw_le_iff refine_pw_simps) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma (in ring) carrier_is_subalgebra:
assumes "K \<subseteq> carrier R" shows "subalgebra K (carrier R) R" | using assms subalgebra.intro[OF add.group_incl_imp_subgroup[of "carrier R"], of K] add.group_axioms unfolding subalgebra_axioms_def
by auto |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma (in domain) Units_mult_eq_Units [simp]: "Units (mult_of R) = Units R" | unfolding Units_def
using insert_Diff integral_iff
by auto |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma toCard_pred_toCard:
"\<lbrakk>|A| \<le>o r; Card_order r\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> toCard_pred A r (toCard A r)" | unfolding toCard_def
using someI_ex[OF ex_toCard_pred] . |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma order_asym: "trans R \<Longrightarrow> asym R = irrefl R" | unfolding asym.simps irrefl_def trans_def
by meson |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma runiq_wrt_ex1:
"runiq R \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall> a \<in> Domain R . \<exists>! b . (a, b) \<in> R)" | using runiq_basic
by (metis Domain.DomainI Domain.cases) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma per_eq: "x \<le>p r\<^sup>\<omega> \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists> k z. r\<^sup>@k\<cdot>z = x \<and> z \<le>p r) \<and> r \<noteq> \<epsilon>" | using per_pref[unfolded pref_pow_conv] . |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma rawpsubstT_atrm[simp,intro]:
assumes "r \<in> atrm" and "snd ` (set txs) \<subseteq> var" and "fst ` (set txs) \<subseteq> atrm"
shows "rawpsubstT r txs \<in> atrm" | using assms
by (induct txs arbitrary: r) auto |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma one_add_square_eq_0: "1 + (x)\<^sup>2 \<noteq> (0::real)" | by (sos "((R<1 + (([~1] * A=0) + (R<1 * (R<1 * [x]^2)))))") |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma good_ruleset_alt: "good_ruleset rs = (\<forall>r\<in>set rs. get_action r = Accept \<or> get_action r = Drop \<or>
get_action r = Reject \<or> get_action r = Log \<or> get_action r = Empty)" | unfolding good_ruleset_def
apply(rule Set.ball_cong)
apply(simp_all)
apply(rename_tac r)
by(case_tac "get_action r")(simp_all) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma divideR_right:
fixes x y :: "'a::real_normed_vector"
shows "r \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> y = x /\<^sub>R r \<longleftrightarrow> r *\<^sub>R y = x" | using scaleR_cancel_left[of r y "x /\<^sub>R r"]
by simp |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma sup_refine[refine]:
assumes "ai \<le>\<Down>R a"
assumes "bi \<le>\<Down>R b"
shows "sup ai bi \<le>\<Down>R (sup a b)" | using assms
by (auto simp: pw_le_iff refine_pw_simps) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma order_less_trans: "\<lbrakk> order r; x \<sqsubset>\<^sub>r y; y \<sqsubset>\<^sub>r z \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> x \<sqsubset>\<^sub>r z" | by (unfold order_def lesssub_def) blast |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma characteriseAx:
shows "r \<in> Ax \<Longrightarrow> r = ([],\<LM> ff \<RM> \<Rightarrow>* \<Empt>) \<or> (\<exists> i. r = ([], \<LM> At i \<RM> \<Rightarrow>* \<LM> At i \<RM>))" | apply (cases r)
by (rule Ax.cases) auto |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma is_top_sorted_antimono:
assumes "R\<subseteq>R'"
assumes "is_top_sorted R' l"
shows "is_top_sorted R l" | using assms unfolding is_top_sorted_alt
by (auto dest: rtrancl_mono_mp) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma D_inv: assumes "trans r" and "irrefl r" and "(r|\<tau>'| -s dl r \<sigma>,r|\<tau>| ) \<in> mul_eq r"
and "(r|\<sigma>'| -s dl r \<tau>,r|\<sigma>| ) \<in> mul_eq r"
shows "D r \<tau> \<sigma> \<sigma>' \<tau>'" | using assms unfolding D_def lemma3_2_2
using lemma2_6_6_a[OF assms(1)] union_commute
by metis |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma connected_root_iff4:
assumes "point r"
shows "connected_root r x \<longleftrightarrow> 1;x = r\<^sup>T;x\<^sup>+" | by (metis assms conv_contrav conv_invol conv_one star_conv star_slide_var connected_root_iff3) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | theorem per_pref: "x \<le>p r\<^sup>\<omega> \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists> k. x \<le>p r\<^sup>@k) \<and> r \<noteq> \<epsilon>" | using per_pref_ex period_root_def pref_pow_ext' pref_prod_pref
by metis |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma alpha_d_more_eqI:
assumes "tr r = tr r'" "wait r = wait r'" "ref r = ref r'" "more r = more r'"
shows "alpha_d.more r = alpha_d.more r'" | using assms
by (cases r, cases r') auto |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma pred_resumption_antimono:
assumes r: "pred_resumption A C r'"
and le: "resumption_ord r r'"
shows "pred_resumption A C r" | using r monotoneD[OF monotone_results le] monotoneD[OF monotone_outputs le]
by(auto simp add: pred_resumption_def) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma isLimOrd_succ:
assumes isLimOrd and "i \<in> Field r"
shows "succ i \<in> Field r" | using assms unfolding isLimOrd_def isSuccOrd_def
by (metis REFL in_notinI refl_on_domain succ_smallest) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma eps_match: "eps test i r \<longleftrightarrow> match test r i i" | by (induction r) (auto dest: antisym[OF match_le match_le]) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma ltlr_expand_Release:
"\<xi> \<Turnstile>\<^sub>r \<phi> R\<^sub>r \<psi> \<longleftrightarrow> (\<xi> \<Turnstile>\<^sub>r \<psi> and\<^sub>r (\<phi> or\<^sub>r (X\<^sub>r (\<phi> R\<^sub>r \<psi>))))" | by (metis ltln_expand_Release ltlr_to_ltln.simps(5-7,9) ltlr_to_ltln_semantics) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma trans_llexord:
"transp r \<Longrightarrow> transp (llexord r)" | by(auto intro!: transpI elim: llexord_trans dest: transpD) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma pure_hn_refineI_no_asm:
assumes "(c,a)\<in>R"
shows "hn_refine emp (return c) emp (pure R) (RETURN a)" | unfolding hn_refine_def
using assms
by (sep_auto simp: pure_def) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma inverse_pow_pow:
assumes "a \<in> carrier G"
shows "inv (a [^] (r::nat)) = (inv a) [^] r" | proof - have "a [^] r \<in> carrier G"
using assms
by blast then show ?thesis
by (simp add: assms nat_pow_inv)
qed |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | theorem ACI_norm_final[simp]:
"final \<guillemotleft>r\<guillemotright> = final r" | proof (induct r) case (Plus r1 r2) thus ?case
using toplevel_summands_final
by (auto simp: final_PLUS)
qed auto |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma lang_rexp_subst: "lang (rexp_subst f r) = subst_word f ` lang r" | by (induction r) (simp_all add: image_Un) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma hom_init: "hom_ab (init_a r) = init_b r" | unfolding init_a_def init_b_def hom_ab.simps
by (simp add: nonfinal_empty_mrexp) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma extended_Ax_prems_empty:
assumes "r \<in> Ax"
shows "fst (extendRule S r) = []" | using assms
apply (cases r)
by (rule Ax.cases) (auto simp add:extendRule_def) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma "(r 0 0 \<and> r 0 1 \<and> r 0 2 \<and> r 0 3) \<or>
(r 1 0 \<and> r 1 1 \<and> r 1 2 \<and> r 1 3) \<or>
(r 2 0 \<and> r 2 1 \<and> r 2 2 \<and> r 2 3) \<or>
(r 3 0 \<and> r 3 1 \<and> r 3 2 \<and> r 3 3)" | by (metis (full_types) rax) |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma non_empty_cycle_root_msc_plus:
assumes "non_empty_cycle_root r x"
shows "x\<^sup>+;r = x\<^sup>T\<^sup>+;r" | using assms many_strongly_connected_iff_7 non_empty_cycle_root_msc
by fastforce |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma d_delta_lnexp_cf2_nonpos: "diff_delta_lnexp_cf2 x \<le> 0" | unfolding diff_delta_lnexp_cf2_def
by (sos "(((R<1 + ((R<1 * ((R<5/4 * [~3/40*x^2 + 1]^2) + (R<11/1280 * [x^2]^2))) + ((A<1 * R<1) * (R<1/64 * [1]^2))))) & ((R<1 + ((R<1 * ((R<5/4 * [~3/40*x^2 + 1]^2) + (R<11/1280 * [x^2]^2))) + ((A<1 * R<1) * (R<1/64 * [1]^2))))))") |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma lang_final: "final r = ([] \<in> lang n r)" | using concI[of "[]" _ "[]"]
by (induct r arbitrary: n) auto |
Given a lemma, please prove it. | lemma in_rtrancl_insert: "x\<in>R\<^sup>* \<Longrightarrow> x\<in>(insert r R)\<^sup>*" | by (metis in_mono rtrancl_mono subset_insertI) |
PSR-Selected Isabelle Proof Dataset
This dataset contains a compact, high-quality collection of Isabelle/HOL theorem-proof pairs for neural theorem proving. It is constructed from a larger raw corpus of approximately 200,000 Isabelle/HOL and Archive of Formal Proofs (AFP) examples, using the PSR data selection criterion proposed in our paper.
PSR selects training examples from three complementary perspectives:
- Proof Complexity: keeps proofs with useful, moderate reasoning structure while filtering overly trivial or excessively long examples.
- Semantic Coverage: improves coverage across different theorem domains and problem types.
- Reasoning Diversity: encourages diverse Isabelle tactics and proof strategies.
The released dataset contains 4,271 theorem-proof pairs and is intended for supervised fine-tuning of language models for Isabelle proof generation.
Dataset Contents
Each example consists of an Isabelle theorem statement and its corresponding formal proof. A typical sample contains:
{
"instruct":"...",
"input": "...",
"output": "..."
}
The dataset can be used to train models that generate Isabelle proofs from formal theorem statements.
Intended Use
This dataset is designed for research on:
- neural theorem proving;
- Isabelle/HOL proof generation;
- formal mathematical reasoning;
- data-centric training for theorem-proving language models;
- supervised fine-tuning of proof-generation models.
In our experiments, fine-tuning DeepSeek-Math-7B-Base with LoRA on this dataset achieved strong performance on the Isabelle portion of miniF2F, despite using far fewer examples than the full raw corpus.
Source and Construction
The dataset is selected from a raw Isabelle proof corpus collected from Isabelle/HOL and AFP. We apply a PSR-guided pipeline that combines:
- complexity-based filtering;
- TF-IDF + K-Means semantic clustering;
- entropy-based reasoning diversity estimation;
- constrained sampling to reduce template-like one-shot proofs.
The final subset is intended to preserve useful proof structure, semantic breadth, and tactic-level diversity.
Limitations
This dataset focuses on Isabelle/HOL theorem proving. It may not directly transfer to other proof assistants such as Lean or Coq without additional conversion or adaptation. Users should also verify compatibility with their Isabelle version and downstream proof-checking environment.
Citation
If you use this dataset, please cite:
@inproceedings{zhu2026enhancing,
title={Enhancing Neural Theorem Proving via High-Quality Data Selection and Verifier Feedback},
author={Zhu, Xiaoxue and Hu, Jilin and Zhang, Fuyuan and Zhang, Jianyu and Zhao, Yongwang},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning},
year={2026}
}
- Downloads last month
- 32