Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2023C00374:body:0:p6
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2023C00374
Segment Type: other
Provision Reference: 
Character Range: 12566–15444

the flight instructor is not authorised to conduct differences training for a variant of the second helicopter, under subregulation 61.1175 (2) of CASR.
Note   The effect of the exemption is that the flight instructor is authorised, under subregulation 61.1175 (2) of CASR, to conduct the activity the subject of the exemption, for a variant of the second helicopter, despite not holding the type rating training endorsement for the type of multi-engine helicopter that includes the helicopter.
       (4) The flight instructor is exempt from compliance with regulation 61.065 of CASR to the extent that the flight instructor is not authorised to conduct training to meet the general competency requirement stated in regulation 61.385 of CASR, in relation to the second helicopter, under subregulation 61.1175 (3) of CASR.
Note   The effect of the exemption is that the flight instructor is authorised, under subregulation 61.1175 (3) of CASR, to conduct the activity the subject of the exemption, in relation to the second helicopter, despite not holding the type rating training endorsement for the type of multi-engine helicopter that includes the helicopter.
       (5) The flight instructor is exempt from compliance with regulation 61.065 of CASR to the extent that the flight instructor is not authorised to conduct a flight review for the pilot type rating, relating to the second helicopter, under subregulation 61.1175 (6) of CASR.
Note   The effect of the exemption is that the flight instructor is authorised, under subregulation 61.1175 (6) of CASR, to conduct the activity the subject of the exemption, in relation to the second helicopter, despite not holding one of the training endorsements mentioned in subregulation 61.1175 (6).
       (6) The flight instructor is exempt from compliance with regulation 61.065 of CASR to the extent that the flight instructor is not authorised to conduct the activity mentioned in subsection (2) or (3), relating to the second helicopter, under paragraph 61.1240 (1) (a) of CASR.
Note   The effect of the exemption is that the flight instructor is authorised, under paragraph 61.1240 (1) (a) of CASR, to conduct the activity the subject of the exemption, in relation to the second helicopter, despite not holding the type rating training endorsement for the type of multi-engine helicopter that includes the helicopter.

Part 4 — Flight examiner

9 Exemption
       (1) This section applies to a flight examiner who:
(a) holds the type rating flight test endorsement for the type of multi-engine helicopter that includes a model of multi-engine helicopter (the first helicopter) mentioned in a cell in column 2 of the table in Schedule 1 but not for another relevant helicopter (the second helicopter); and
(b) holds the pilot type rating, relating to the first helicopter, mentioned in the corresponding cell in column 3 of