Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2023C00919:body:0:p110
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2023C00919
Segment Type: other
Provision Reference: 
Character Range: 327821–331160

rs                 Amendment 1
                    rs                 Amendment 3
                    am                 Amendment 4
                    rs                 Amendment 5
                    rs                 Amendment 6
Appendix B          ad                 Amendment 2
                    rep                Amendment 3

[1] Former title of the Agreement: Agreement Concerning the Adoption of Uniform Conditions of Approval and Reciprocal Recognition of Approval for Motor Vehicle Equipment and Parts, done at Geneva on 20 March 1958.
[2] As defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3.), document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.3, para. 2 - www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/wp29resolutions.html
[3] In the case of lighting devices for the rear registration plate and direction-indicators of categories 5 and 6, the "light-emitting surface" shall be used.
[4] Examples to enable a decision regarding reciprocal incorporation of lamps can be found in Annex 3, Part 7.
[5] CIE Publication 15.2, 1986, Colorimetry, the CIE 1931 standard colorimetric observer.
[6] The distinguishing numbers of the Contracting Parties to the 1958 Agreement are reproduced in Annex 3 to the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3), document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev. 3, Annex 3 - www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/wp29resolutions.html
[7] This does not apply to dedicated objects that may be added to the exterior of the headlamp.
[8] Measurement of the chromaticity coordinates of the light emitted by the lamps is not part of this regulation.
[9] Also known as white or colourless retro-reflector.
[10] Nothing in this Regulation shall preclude the Contracting Parties applying this Regulation from allowing the use of white conspicuity markings to the rear in their territories.
[11] As defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3.), document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.3, para. 2 - www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/wp29resolutions.html
[12] Contracting Parties to the respective regulations can still prohibit the use of mechanical cleaning systems when headlamps with plastic lenses, marked "PL", are installed.
[13] As defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3.), document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev.3, para. 2 - www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/wp29resolutions.html
[14] New vehicle types which do not comply with this provision may continue to be approved until 18 months after the entry into force of Supplement 4 to the 03 series of amendments.
[15] The Contracting Parties not applying Regulation No. 87 may prohibit the presence of DRL (as specified in paragraph 5.22.) on the basis of national regulations.
[16] New vehicle types which do not comply with this provision may continue to be approved until 18 months after the entry into force of Supplement 4 to the 03 series of amendments.
[17] In case of additional "two symmetrically placed lighting units" the horizontal distance may be 200 mm (C in the figure).
[18] Traffic directions being separated by means of road construction, or, a corresponding lateral distance of opposing traffic is identified. This implies a reduction of undue glare from vehicles headlamps in opposing traffic.
[19] This provision does