Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2021C00104:schedule:1:p13
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2021C00104
Segment Type: schedule
Provision Reference: sch 1 (pt 13/43)
Character Range: 47876–51024

(i) the actions of bona fide medical personnel involving a prohibited substance that is used for genuine and legal therapeutic purposes, or with other acceptable justification; or
 (ii) actions involving prohibited substances that are not prohibited in out‑of‑competition testing unless the circumstances as a whole demonstrate such prohibited substances are not intended for genuine and legal therapeutic purposes or are intended to enhance sport performance.

2.01H  Administration or attempted administration of a prohibited substance or prohibited method by an athlete, support person or non‑participant
 (1) Administration or attempted administration by an athlete, support person or non‑participant to any athlete in‑competition of a prohibited substance or prohibited method, or administration or attempted administration to any athlete out‑of‑competition of a prohibited substance or prohibited method that is prohibited out‑of‑competition, constitutes a violation of an anti‑doping rule.
 (2) In the NAD scheme:
administration, in relation to a prohibited substance or prohibited method:
 (a) means providing, supplying, supervising, facilitating, or otherwise participating in, the use or attempted use by another person of a prohibited substance or prohibited method; but
 (b) does not include:
 (i) the actions of bona fide medical personnel involving a prohibited substance that is used for genuine and legal therapeutic purposes, or with other acceptable justification; or
 (ii) actions involving prohibited substances that are not prohibited in out‑of‑competition testing unless the circumstances as a whole demonstrate such prohibited substances are not intended for genuine and legal therapeutic purposes or are intended to enhance sport performance.

2.01J  Complicity or attempted complicity by an athlete, support person or non‑participant
  Assisting, encouraging, aiding, abetting, conspiring, covering‑up or any other type of intentional complicity, or attempted complicity, involving an anti‑doping rule violation, or a violation of Article 10.14.1 of the World Anti‑Doping Code, by another person constitutes a violation of an anti‑doping rule.

2.01K  Prohibited association by an athlete, support person or non‑participant
 (1) Association by a participant or non‑participant in a professional or sport‑related capacity with a support person covered by Article 2.10.1.1, 2.10.1.2 or 2.10.1.3 of the World Anti‑Doping Code constitutes a violation of an anti‑doping rule.
 (2) To establish the violation, the CEO must establish that the participant or non‑participant knew that the support person was covered by that Article.
 (3) The burden is on the participant or non‑participant to establish either or both of the following:
 (a) that any association with the support person was not in a professional or sport‑related capacity;
 (b) that any such association could not have been reasonably avoided.

Freedom of association
 (10) Subclause (1) does not apply to the extent (if any) that it would be inconsistent with Article 22 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, done at New York on 16 December