Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2024L00482:reg:11:p1
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2024L00482
Segment Type: reg
Provision Reference: reg 11 (pt 1/6)
Character Range: 174522–177835

11     Organisations/persons involved in evaluating the performance of the plan
This plan should be reviewed no later than five years from when it was endorsed and the review should be made publicly available. The review will determine the performance of the plan and assess:
    * whether the plan continues unchanged, is varied to remove completed actions, or varied to include new conservation priorities; or
    * whether a recovery plan is no longer necessary for the species as either a conservation advice will suffice, or the species can be removed from the threatened species list.
As part of this review, the listing status of the species will be re-assessed against the EPBC Act species listing criteria. The review will be coordinated by the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water in association with relevant Australian and state government agencies, the national Swift Parrot Recovery Team and key stakeholder groups such as non-governmental organisations, local community groups, scientific research organisations and individual experts.
Australian Government
    * Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water
State/territory governments
    * Victoria – Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action
    * New South Wales – Department of Planning, Industry and Environment; Forestry Corporation of NSW
    * Queensland – Department of Environment and Science
    * South Australia – Department for Environment and Water
    * Tasmania – Department of Natural Resources and Environment
    * Australian Capital Territory – Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate
    * Natural Resource Management bodies
    * local government bodies
Non-government organisations
    * BirdLife Australia
    * local conservation groups
    * local communities
    * private landholders
    * Indigenous communities
    * industry
    * universities and other research organisations
    * Swift Parrot Recovery Team

References
Allen M, Webb M, Alves F, Heinsohn R, and Stojanovic, D (2018) Occupancy patterns of the introduced, predatory sugar glider in Tasmanian forests. Austral Ecology 43, 470–475.
Barrios L and Rodriguez A (2004). Behavioural and environmental correlates of soaring-bird mortality at on-shore wind turbines. Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 72–81.
BirdLife International (2020) The World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas. Developed by the Key Biodiversity Areas Partnership: BirdLife International, IUCN, Amphibian Survival Alliance, Conservation International, Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, Global Environment Facility, Global Wildlife Conservation, NatureServe, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, World Wildlife Fund and Wildlife Conservation Society. Downloaded from http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org on 10 August 2020.
Brown PB (1989). The Swift Parrot Lathamus discolor White: A report on its ecology, distribution and status, including management considerations. Technical Report. (Department of Lands, Parks and Wildlife: Hobart).
Campbell CD, Sarre SD, and Stojanovic D (2018).When is a native species invasive? Incursion of a novel predatory marsupial detected using molecular and historical data. Diversity and Distributions. 2018; 24, 831–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12717
Chambers LE,