Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:C2018C00182:section:30:p8
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:C2018C00182
Segment Type: section
Provision Reference: s 30 (pt 8/12)
Character Range: 57228–60044

the negotiation for the abolition of consular jurisdiction which is still enjoyed by nationals of some Powers, the CHINESE Government is unable to accept Article 10, which involves the general undertaking of a Government to grant extradition of a foreigner who is accused of counterfeiting currency by a third State.
(3) As regards the provisions of Article 20, the delegation of the UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS reserves for its Government the right to address, if it so desires, the instrument of its ratification to another signatory State in order that the latter may transmit a copy thereof to the Secretary‑General of the League of Nations for notification to all the signatory or acceding States.

III. DECLARATIONS

SWITZERLAND
At the moment of signing the Convention, the representative of Switzerland made the following declaration:
  "The Swiss Federal Council, being unable to assume any obligation as to the penal clauses of the Convention before the question of the introduction of a unified penal code in Switzerland is settled in the affirmative, draws attention to the fact that the ratification of the Convention cannot be accomplished in a fixed time.
  "Nevertheless, the Federal Council is disposed to put into execution, to the extent of its authority, the administrative provisions of the Convention whenever these will come into force in accordance with Article 25."

UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS
At the moment of signing the Convention, the representative of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics made the following declaration:
  "The delegation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, while accepting the provisions of Article 19, declares that the Government of the Union does not propose to have recourse, in so far as it is concerned, to the jurisdiction of the Permanent Court of International Justice.
  "As regards the provision in the same Article by which disputes which it has not been possible to settle by direct negotiations would be submitted to any other arbitral procedure than that of the Permanent Court of International Justice, the delegation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics expressly declares that acceptance of this provision must not be interpreted as modifying the point of view of the Government of the Union on the general question of arbitration as a means of settling disputes between States."
The present Protocol in so far as it creates obligations between the High Contracting Parties will have the same force, effect and duration as the Convention of to‑day's date, of which it is to be considered as an integral part.
IN FAITH WHEREOF the undersigned have affixed their signatures to the present Protocol.
DONE at Geneva, this twentieth day of April, one thousand nine hundred and twenty‑nine, in a single copy, which shall be