Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:C2025C00155:section:269zzm:p2
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:C2025C00155
Segment Type: section
Provision Reference: s 269ZZM (pt 2/2)
Character Range: 2048152–2050208

such a notice; or
 (aa) in the case of a notice published where the following applies:
 (i) the reviewable decision is a decision by the Minister under subsection 269ZHG(1) not to secure the continuation of anti‑dumping measures;
 (ii) those measures comprised the giving of an undertaking by a person;
 (iii) the person was released from the undertaking under subsection 269ZHG(3);
 (iv) the person does not agree to the undertaking being reinstated;
  5 years after the day the decision to publish the notice takes effect; or
 (b) in the case of a varied or substituted notice—5 years after the publication of the original notice.
Example: If the reviewable decision relates to a dumping duty notice that was published on 1 July 1998, and if the Minister, following a review under this Division, revokes that notice and substitutes a new dumping duty notice on 1 January 1999, the substituted notice will expire on 1 July 2003.
 (5A) A notice that is reinstated under subsection (1), as mentioned in paragraph (3)(d), expires 5 years after the day the decision to reinstate the notice takes effect, unless the reinstated notice is revoked before the end of that period.
 (5B) An undertaking that is reinstated under subsection (1), as mentioned in paragraph (3)(e), expires 5 years after the day the decision to reinstate the undertaking takes effect, unless provision is made for its earlier expiration.
 (6) If:
 (a) the Minister makes a decision under subsection (1) to revoke or vary a dumping duty notice or countervailing duty notice (the original notice), or to revoke the original notice and substitute another notice, with effect from a date before the Minister's decision; and
 (b) an amount of interim duty has been paid on goods the subject of the original notice in excess of the amount of interim duty that would have been payable on those goods as a result of the Minister's decision;
the person who paid the interim duty may apply for a refund of the excess under Division 3 of Part VIII.

Subdivision C—Review of Commissioner's decisions