Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:C2016A00082:clause:9_24:p2
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:C2016A00082
Segment Type: clause
Provision Reference: sch 9 cl 24 (pt 2/3)
Character Range: 103338–106004

from any telecommunications service used, or likely to be used, by the person in respect of whom the warrant is sought; or
 (ii) communications made by means of a particular telecommunications device or particular telecommunications devices used, or likely to be used, by the person in respect of whom the warrant is sought;
  as the case requires; and
 (b) how much the information referred to in paragraph (2A)(e) would be likely to assist in connection with:
 (i) the protection of the public from a terrorist act; or
 (ii) preventing the provision of support for, or the facilitation of, a terrorist act; or
 (iii) preventing the provision of support for, or the facilitation of, the engagement in a hostile activity in a foreign country; or
 (iv) determining whether the control order, or any succeeding control order, has been, or is being, complied with; and
 (c) to what extent methods (including the use of a warrant issued under section 46) for:
 (i) the protection of the public from a terrorist act; or
 (ii) preventing the provision of support for, or the facilitation of, a terrorist act; or
 (iii) preventing the provision of support for, or the facilitation of, the engagement in a hostile activity in a foreign country; or
 (iv) determining whether the control order, or any succeeding control order, has been, or is being, complied with;
  that do not involve the use of a warrant issued under this section in relation to the person have been used by, or are available to, the agency; and
 (d) how much the use of such methods would be likely to assist in connection with:
 (i) the protection of the public from a terrorist act; or
 (ii) preventing the provision of support for, or the facilitation of, a terrorist act; or
 (iii) preventing the provision of support for, or the facilitation of, the engagement in a hostile activity in a foreign country; or
 (iv) determining whether the control order, or any succeeding control order, has been, or is being, complied with; and
 (e) how much the use of such methods would be likely to prejudice:
 (i) the protection of the public from a terrorist act; or
 (ii) preventing the provision of support for, or the facilitation of, a terrorist act; or
 (iii) preventing the provision of support for, or the facilitation of, the engagement in a hostile activity in a foreign country; or
 (iv) determining whether the control order, or any succeeding control order, has been, or is being, complied with;
  whether because of delay or for any other reason; and
 (f) whether intercepting under a warrant communications referred to in paragraph (a) of this subsection would be the method that is likely to have