Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2018L01206:reg:25
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2018L01206
Segment Type: reg
Provision Reference: reg 25
Character Range: 63584–66380

25  Post-upgrade declaration by MVP
 (1) A post-upgrade declaration about an upgraded IE unit is a declaration by an MVP in accordance with this section.
 (2) A post-upgrade declaration must be made after the end of the project measurement period, following the upgrade of the IE unit.
 (3) To avoid doubt, a post-upgrade declaration may be made using more than one document.
 (4) A post-upgrade declaration must be signed or electronically authenticated by the MVP and must include the following:
 (a) a reference that identifies the pre-upgrade declaration for the IE unit;
 (b) any changes to details set out in the pre-upgrade declaration that are required to accurately describe the IE unit, the upgrade as implemented and the effects of the upgrade;
 (c) if any such changes are not material—a declaration to that effect;
 (d) if there are material differences:
 (i) a description of each difference and the reasons why the relevant element continues to satisfy this determination; and
 (ii) a declaration to the effect that the relevant elements continue to satisfy this determination;
 (e) the date the upgraded unit was commissioned;
 (f) a description of the upgraded unit showing that it satisfies subsection 10(4) (not operating irregularly or intermittently); and
 (g) details of the project measurement period with:
 (i) a description of the evidence that it satisfies subsections 22(6) to (11); and
 (ii) a summary of the calculations that show that it satisfies the output representativeness criterion for each sub-unit (subsection 22(12));
 (iii) reasons why the baseline period and project measurement period satisfy subsection 22(4) (limitation on concurrent maintenance or other work);
 (h) a statement that the MVP has examined the calculations of the rate of abatement produced by the IE upgrade (ERBi – ERP,i where these are given by equations 2 and 3) and is satisfied that the amount is consistent with its being predominantly the result of the IE upgrade;
 (i) if the MVP did not make the pre-upgrade statement—a statement of the MVP's qualifications, showing that he or she satisfies section 26;
 (j) a statement that the MVP is satisfied that the IE unit continues to fulfil the requirements of this determination.
 (5) An MVP may provide a post-upgrade declaration only if he or she is satisfied that:
 (a) he or she has received from the project proponent any information about the IE unit that he or she needs to make the declaration; and
 (b) the information received is accurate and does not contain anything misleading.
 (6) An MVP who provides the project proponent with a post-upgrade declaration must provide, at the same time, written evidence supporting the statements and calculations, including the calculations, assumptions, information and inputs used.