Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:C2024C00866:section:176:p2
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:C2024C00866
Segment Type: section
Provision Reference: s 176 (pt 2/3)
Character Range: 1725213–1727871

Review Tribunal Act 2024, an application to the Administrative Review Tribunal for review of a decision must be made within the period of 3 months after the applicant is given a document setting out the terms of the decision.
 (4A) Despite section 19 of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024, the Administrative Review Tribunal must not extend the period during which an application may be made beyond the period of 12 months after the day on which the document setting out the terms of the decision was given to the applicant.
 (5) Despite subsection 22(1) of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024, the parties to a proceeding before the Administrative Review Tribunal for a review of a reviewable decision are:
 (a) if the person who has applied for a review of the decision is a person other than the Commission:
 (i) the person who has so applied; and
 (ii) the Commission; or
 (b) in any other case:
 (i) the Commission; and
 (ii) the veteran, or dependant of a deceased veteran, affected by that decision.
 (7) Despite section 105 of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024, where the Administrative Review Tribunal sets aside a decision under subsection 31(6) to cancel or suspend, or reduce the rate of, a pension or attendant allowance, or a decision under subsection 31(8) to increase the rate of a pension or attendant allowance, being:
 (a) a decision of the Commission that has been affirmed by the Board; or
 (b) a decision of the Board that was made in substitution for a decision of the Commission;
the Tribunal need not make another decision in substitution for the decision so set aside.
 (8) Despite section 105 of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024, where the Administrative Review Tribunal sets aside a decision:
 (a) to cancel or suspend a pension under section 56E; or
 (b) to reduce the rate of a pension under section 56D; or
 (c) to increase the rate of a pension under section 56C;
and the decision was one that was:
 (d) affirmed by the Commission under section 57B; or
 (e) made by the Commission in substitution for a decision set aside under section 57B;
the Tribunal need not make another decision in substitution for the decision set aside by it.
 (9) Despite section 105 of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024, where the Administrative Review Tribunal:
 (a) sets aside a decision that a person ceases to be entitled to a seniors health card; and
 (b) the decision was one that was:
 (i) affirmed by the Commission under section 118ZU; or
 (ii) made by the Commission in substitution for a decision set aside under that section;
the Tribunal need not make another decision in substitution for