Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2016L01891:body:0:p77
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2016L01891
Segment Type: other
Provision Reference: 
Character Range: 221470–224558

initiatives within the resourcing levels in place at that time.
However, the Commonwealth has developed an ongoing capital program in 2015-2016 which has increased
available funding. The works program was focused on maintenance works and based on a 1988 Maintenance
Manual (which was under review). However, the Museum, which was separately funded by the Norfolk Island
administration, was relatively well resourced and could adjust casual staffing to reflect visitor demand, entry fee
and tour income.

The relatively small works crew is highly skilled and very experienced to undertake the required maintenance
and work of the grounds, gardens, buildings and structures. The works crew are predominantly older men and,
in time, if there is not a new generation of apprentices trained and offered opportunities to gain experience, this
important skill set is in danger of being lost. However, the quantum of work undertaken and the absence of
formally qualified tradespeople (who can be 'masters' for apprentices) present barriers to new apprenticeship
opportunities. The facilities, and plant and equipment available to the works crew require review and upgrading.

Kingston and Arthur's Vale Historic Area—Heritage Management Plan, April 2016

Authorised Version F2016L01891 registered 09/12/2016

6.3 Private Landholdings

The KAVHA site includes approximately 50 hectares of freehold or leasehold land, mainly across the
hillslopes that form an important landscape backdrop to the historic area. Some significant historic
features associated with the phases of settlement at Kingston and Arthur's Vale are located on some of
these properties. There are 17 freehold and 15 leasehold properties within the KAVHA site. Many
landholders have occupied these properties for generations. The landholders recognise that the site is an
important part of Norfolk Island and Australian history, as well as a part of their own Pitcairner and Norfolk
Island heritage.

Landholders have expressed frustration with the perceived complexities of planning approvals processes,
the lack of clarity regarding what is permissible, and the costs associated with planning applications. They
seek fewer restrictions on development, with development decisions based on careful assessment of the
real impacts on the historic site. Better communication and clearer development guidelines by the Norfolk
Island administration are seen to be needed, and landholders understandably believe that the same rules
should apply to all landholders—government and private alike.

Landholders should have access to expertise, advice and other resources to contribute towards their own
heritage and conservation efforts. Consultation with the Norfolk Island Planning Office by a landholder
during the initial stages of a proposal could help define what use and development is permissible and the
required procedures associated with an application. All landholders can avail themselves of exemptions
from the need to obtain development consent for compliant works under the Norfolk Island Plan.

Private landholders feel a