Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2017L01229:body:0:p22
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2017L01229
Segment Type: other
Provision Reference: 
Character Range: 58680–62089

(optional);
(e) Lateral acceleration (aY);
(f) Yaw velocity (d/dt);
(g) Roll velocity (d/dt);
(h) Pitch velocity (d/dt);
(i) Roll angle ();
(j) Pitch angle ().
2.2. The objective is to show that the simulated vehicle behaviour and operation of the vehicle stability function is comparable with that seen in practical vehicle tests.
2.3. The simulator shall be deemed to be validated when its output is comparable to the practical test results produced by a given vehicle type during the dynamic manoeuvres of paragraph 9.9. of this Regulation. The relationship of activation and sequence of the vehicle stability function in the simulation and in the practical vehicle test shall be the means of making the comparison.
2.4. The physical parameters that are different between the reference vehicle and simulated vehicle configurations shall be modified accordingly in the simulation.
2.5. A simulator test report shall be produced, a model of which is defined in Annex 5 to this Regulation, and a copy attached to the vehicle approval report.
Annex 5
  Vehicle stability function simulation tool test report
Test Report Number: ..............................................
1. Identification
1.1. Name and address of the simulation tool manufacturer...............
1.2. Simulation tool identification: name/model/number (hardware and software)
 ...................................................
2. Scope of application
2.1. Vehicle type:..........................................
2.2. Vehicle configurations:....................................
3. Verifying vehicle test
3.1. Description of vehicle(s):..................................
3.1.1. Vehicle(s) identification: make/model/VIN.......................
3.1.2. Vehicle description, including suspension/wheels, engine and drive line, braking system(s), steering system, with name/model/number identification:
 ...................................................
3.1.3. Vehicle data used in the simulation (explicit):.....................
3.2. Description of location(s), road/test area surface conditions, temperature and date(s):
3.3. Results with the vehicle stability function switched on and off, including the motion variables referred to in Annex 4, paragraph 2.1. as appropriate:
4. Simulation results
4.1. Vehicle parameters and the values used in the simulation that are not taken from the actual test vehicle (implicit):
4.2. Yaw stability and lateral displacement according to paragraphs 7.1. to 7.3. of this Regulation:
5. This test has been carried out and the results reported in accordance with Annex 4 to Regulation No. 140.
 Technical Service conducting the test[10] .......................
 Signed: ……………………..   Date: ..……………………
 Approval Authority1 ……………………………………....…………………..
 Signed: …………………….   Date: …..……………… "

* The category code may also be in the format L1, L2, L3 etc.
** See clause 3.1.
[*] * Former title of the Agreement: Agreement Concerning the Adoption of Uniform Conditions of Approval and Reciprocal Recognition of Approval for Motor Vehicle Equipment and Parts, done at Geneva on 20 March 1958.
[1] M1 and N1 categories of vehicles are defined in the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3.), document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/78/Rev. 4, para. 2. - www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/wp29resolutions.html
[2] An axle group shall be treated as a single axle and dual wheels shall