Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2023L00432:reg:6:p4
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2023L00432
Segment Type: reg
Provision Reference: reg 6 (pt 4/20)
Character Range: 88861–92549

consultation with conservation organisations, Traditional Owners, Indigenous rangers, state and territory government conservation agencies, and other land managers is necessary to identify further sites relevant to this plan.
Sites identified in the plan are shown on maps available with this plan. The recovery team may revise these maps during the life of the plan, to reflect new information about the need for the implementation of actions at identified or additional sites.
The partner/s who have an interest in implementing each action have been identified in the action tables (Table 1 to Table 8). Depending on the action, a partner may be an individual group or organisation, or a term used to describe a sector or type of organisation, for example conservation organisation.

6.3.1             Supporting Strategy: Survey, monitoring, and information management
The actions required to conserve the Greater Bilby vary at each site according to local conditions and the way the threats interact. The effectiveness of actions at a local scale may be reliant on adapting actions to those circumstances, including for example the way threats, such as predator distribution and abundance, change due to impacts of climate change. Monitoring provides the ability to test the impact of management actions and modify or change actions if required. Monitoring is also required to measure performance against the objectives of the plan.
Although survey and monitoring methods are expected to vary across the distribution of the Greater Bilby in order to accommodate local ecological conditions, skills and capacity, it is intended that standardisation of simple and repeatable methods over time will improve the consistency and comparability of the data available for analysis.
While not specifically identified as an action, it is important that existing traditional ecological knowledge be considered when implementing this strategy (Table 1).
Table 1 Strategic actions for survey, monitoring and information management
Action  Description                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Partners
1a      In collaboration with land managers, survey for bilbies to identify further sites for management or monitoring. Priority areas include pastoral and other privately-managed lands in                                                                                                   State and territory government conservation agencies, Save the Bilby Fund, other land managers, Indigenous land managers and organisations, including Indigenous rangers and Traditional Owners
            * Western Queensland west and south of Pullen Pullen to Birdsville,
            * North-western Western Australia, including the Pilbara, Gascoyne, Dampierland, and Ord Valley Plain IBRA regions, and
            * Western Northern Territory
        These areas are shown on the maps associated with the recovery plan as survey and liaison areas.
1b      Continue or start bilby monitoring and bilby surveys to establish baseline and measure management impact:                                                                                                                                                                              Indigenous land managers and organisations, including Indigenous rangers and Traditional Owners, Save the Bilby Fund, other land managers, state and territory government conservation agencies, AWC and species experts.
            * Facilitate and