Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:C2024C00749:clause:1_60:p5
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:C2024C00749
Segment Type: clause
Provision Reference: sch 1 cl 60 (pt 5/7)
Character Range: 847948–850704

Judge or nominated ART member;
 (i) in relation to an application by a Part 5.3 IPO agency of Queensland—any submissions made by a Queensland PIM under clause 59 to the eligible Judge or nominated ART member;
 (j)  such other matters (if any) as the eligible Judge or nominated ART member considers relevant.
 (6) In deciding whether to issue an international production order under subclause (2) (in the case of an application for an international production order that is in respect of one or more individual message/call application services), the eligible Judge or nominated ART member must have regard to the following matters:
 (a) how much the privacy of any person or persons would be likely to be interfered with by intercepting, under an international production order, messages sent or received, voice calls made or received, or video calls made or received, using those individual message/call application services;
 (b) how much the information referred to in paragraph (2)(j) would be likely to assist in connection with:
 (i) achieving a Part 5.3 object; or
 (ii) determining whether the Part 5.3 supervisory order, or any succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order, has been, or is being, complied with;
 (c) to what extent methods for:
 (i) achieving a Part 5.3 object; or
 (ii) determining whether the Part 5.3 supervisory order, or any succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order, has been, or is being, complied with;
  that do not involve so intercepting messages, voice calls or video calls have been used by, or are available to, the agency;
 (d) how much the use of such methods would be likely to assist in connection with:
 (i) achieving a Part 5.3 object; or
 (ii) determining whether the Part 5.3 supervisory order, or any succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order, has been, or is being, complied with;
 (e) how much the use of such methods would be likely to prejudice:
 (i) achieving a Part 5.3 object; or
 (ii) determining whether the Part 5.3 supervisory order, or any succeeding Part 5.3 supervisory order, has been, or is being, complied with;
  whether because of delay or for any other reason;
 (f) whether intercepting, under an international production order, messages sent or received, voice calls made or received, or video calls made or received, using those individual message/call application services would be the method that is likely to have the least interference with any person's privacy;
 (g) in relation to a Part 5.3 supervisory order that is a control order—the possibility that the person in relation to whom the control order is in force:
 (i) has engaged, is engaging, or will engage, in a terrorist act; or
 (ii) has provided, is providing, or will provide, support for a terrorist act; or
 (iii) has facilitated,