Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2024L00408:front:0:p359
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2024L00408
Segment Type: other
Provision Reference: 
Character Range: 1106434–1109424

Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment;  and
                * possibly seeking a decision from the Minister under the EPBC Act.

           In the last case, a decision under Section 15B of the EPBC Act may be necessary because of the nature of the action involved.

           Commentary:  The outcome of this process may be a matter to be recorded in the NCA's heritage register.

           8.5 The implementation of this plan will be reviewed every second year, and the priorities re-assessed depending on resources or any other relevant factors.  The review will consider the degree to which policies and strategies have been met or completed in accordance with the timetable, as well as the actual condition of the place (Policies 3, 20 and 31).  The Criteria for Prioritising Work (Strategy 8.3) will be used if resource constraints do not allow the implementation of actions as programmed.

Policy 9 Review of the management plan
       This management plan will be reviewed:
            * once every five years in accordance with section 324W of the EPBC Act;  and
            * to take account of new information and ensure consistency with current management circumstances, again at least every five years;  or
            * whenever major changes to the place are proposed or occur by accident (such as fire or natural disaster);  or
            * when the management environment changes to the degree that policies are not appropriate to or adequate for changed management circumstances.

       Implementation Strategies

           9.1 The NCA will undertake a review of the management plan if it is found to be out of date with regards to significance assessment, management obligations or policy direction.

           Commentary

           While plans for National Heritage places are made by the Minister responsible for the EPBC Act, effectively the review of this plan will be undertaken by the NCA.

           Conservation management planning for places which are part of, include or are adjacent to Anzac Parade may lead to changed circumstances and a need to review this plan.

    Liaison

The following policies deal with a number of general relationships where liaison or consultation is required.  A few other specific consultations are dealt with in other policies (ie. Policies 4, 6, 8, 16, 32 and 40).  Importantly, the relationship with the Australian War Memorial is dealt with at Policy 6.

       Policy 10 Relationship with the Commonwealth Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment
       The NCA will maintain regular contact with this Department, including informal consultations where appropriate, and formally refer any action that potentially impacts on any heritage values or places as required by the EPBC Act, and any amendments to this Act.

       Implementation Strategies

           10.1 The NCA may provide a copy of this plan to the Department for consideration of possible amendments to the National Heritage