Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2023L00858:body:0:p35
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2023L00858
Segment Type: other
Provision Reference: 
Character Range: 146149–149354

February 2022. Any comments received that were relevant to the survival of the species were considered by the Threatened Species Scientific Committee as part of its assessment process.

12.  Organisations and persons involved in   evaluating the performance of the plan

This plan should be reviewed no later than five years from when it was endorsed and made publicly available. The review will determine the performance of the plan and assess:

   * whether the plan continues unchanged, is varied to remove completed actions, or varied to include new conservation priorities; or
   * whether a recovery plan is no longer necessary for the species' as either conservation advice will suffice, or the species' are removed from the threatened species list.

As part of this review, the listing status of the species' will be assessed against the EPBC Act species listing criteria.

The review will be coordinated by the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (Cwth) in association with relevant Australian and state government agencies and key stakeholder groups such as non-governmental organisations, local community groups and scientific research organisations.

Key stakeholders who may be involved in the review of the performance of the Recovery Plan for the Black-breasted Button-quail include organisations likely to be affected by the actions proposed in this plan and are expected to include:

Australian Government
    *  Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water
    *  Department of Defence

Queensland Government
    *  Queensland Government Department of Environment and Science
    *  Department of Transport and Main Roads
    *  Economic Development Queensland

New South Wales Government
    *  Department of Planning and Environment
    *  Department of Primary Industries – Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Divisions
    *  Transport for New South Wales

Non-government organisations
    *  BirdLife Australia
    *  NRM groups
    *  Traditional Owner groups
    *  Universities

13.  References

  Bird JP, Martin R, Akçakaya HR, Gilroy J, Burfield IJ, Garnett ST, Symes A, Taylor J, Şekercioğlu ÇH & Butchart SHM (2020) Generation lengths of the world's birds and their implications for extinction risk. Conservation Biology 34, 1252–1261.

  BirdLife International (2021) The World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas. Developed by the Key Biodiversity Areas Partnership: BirdLife International, IUCN, Amphibian Survival Alliance, Conservation International, Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, Global Environment Facility, Global Wildlife Conservation, NatureServe, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, World Wildlife Fund and Wildlife Conservation Society. Accessed: 1 July 2021 . Available at: http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org.

  Blakers M, Davies SJJF & Reilly PN (1984) 'The atlas of Australian birds.' Melbourne University Press. Melbourne.

  Bradshaw C (2012) Little left to lose: Deforestation and forest degradation in Australia since European colonization. Journal of Plant Ecology 5, 109–120.

  Bravery JA (1970) The birds of the Atherton Shire, Queensland. Emu 70, 49–63.

  Centre for Invasive Species