Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2017L01040:body:0:p32
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2017L01040
Segment Type: other
Provision Reference: 
Character Range: 129095–132330

gouldi) (2016) has been developed through ongoing consultation with a broad range of stakeholders. The consultation process commenced with a workshop in Tasmania that brought together key species experts, conservation managers and land managers, to categorize ongoing threats to the species and identify knowledge gaps and potential management options. Workshop participants included representatives from DoEE, DPIPWE, CSIRO, FPA, IFS, Hydro Tasmania, researchers from UTAS, other species experts and local community groups. These parties were engaged repeatedly throughout the development of the draft recovery plan, which was subsequently released for a three month public consultation period. Submissions were invited from any interested parties during this period. In the process of finalising the recovery plan DoEE continued to work closely with key stakeholders, including DPIPWE, FPA, FT and independent researchers.

14 Organisations/persons involved in evaluating the performance of the plan
This plan should be reviewed no later than five years from when it was endorsed and made publically available. The review will determine the performance of the plan and assess:
        * whether the plan continues unchanged, is varied to remove completed actions, or varied to include new conservation priorities; and
        * whether a recovery plan is no longer necessary for the species as either conservation advice will suffice, or the species is removed from the threatened species list.
As part of this review, the listing status of the species will be assessed against the EPBC Act species listing criteria.
The review will be coordinated by DoEE in association with relevant Australian and state government agencies and key stakeholder groups such as non-governmental organisations, local community groups and scientific research organisations.
Key stakeholders who may be involved in the review of the performance of the Recovery Plan for the Giant Freshwater Crayfish (Astacopsis gouldi), include organisations likely to be affected by the actions proposed in this plan and are expected to include:
Australian Government
Department of the Environment and Energy
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
State/territory governments
Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (Tas)
Inland Fisheries Service (Tas)
Forestry Tasmania (Tas)
Forest Practices Authority (Tas)
Hydro Tasmania (Tas)
Tasmanian Irrigation (Tas)
Local government across the species range

Non-government organisations
Natural resource management bodies across the species range
Conservation groups
Local communities
Universities and other research organisations
Recreational fishers and associations

15 References
Barmuta LA, Linke S and Turak E (2011), Bridging the gap between 'planning' and 'doing' for biodiversity conservation in freshwaters. Freshwater Biology 56, 180–195.

Boulton AJ and Brock MA (1999). Australian Freshwater Ecology: Processes and Management. Gleneagles Publishing, Glen Osmond South Australia.

Bryant SL and Jackson JE (1999). Tasmania's Threatened Fauna Handbook: what, where and how to protect Tasmania's threatened animals. Threatened Species Unit, Parks and Wildlife Service,