Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2009L00293:body:0
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2009L00293
Segment Type: other
Provision Reference: 
Character Range: 0–2738

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE
On the effective date specified below, and for the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below revokes Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD/HU 369/108 Amdt 2 and issues the following AD under subregulation 39.001(1) of CASR 1998.  The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.

McDonnell Douglas (Hughes) and Kawasaki 369 Series Helicopters
AD/HU 369/108 Amdt 3  Tailboom Attachment  2/2009

Applicability:  Model 600N helicopters, serial numbers with a prefix "RN" and 003 through 058, that have not been modified in the fuselage aft section to strengthen the tailboom attachments and longerons in accordance with MD Helicopters Technical Bulletins TB600N-007, TB600N-007R1, or TB600N-007R2, or a later FAA approved revision.
Requirement:    Action in accordance with the technical requirements of FAA AD 2008-20-05
                Amdt 39-15684.
Compliance:     As specified in the Requirement document.
                This Amendment becomes effective on 12 February 2009.
Background:     The FAA received a report of a cracked tailboom attachment bolt on an MD 600N helicopter.  Further inspection revealed cracking on bolts and attachments on several other helicopters.  This condition, if not corrected, could result in failure of a tailboom attachment, loss of the tailboom, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

                Amendment 1 required the same actions as the original issue of this Directive, but also required additional inspection holes in the aft fuselage skin panels and inspection of the upper and lower tailboom attachment fittings, the upper longerons, and the angles and nutplates for cracks.  It also required eventual replacement of the upper right tailboom attachment fitting.

                Amendment 2 required modification of the fuselage aft section to strengthen the tailboom attachment fittings and upper longerons.

   Amendment 3 is issued in response to a new FAA AD, which requires modifying the fuselage aft section, repetitively inspecting the tailboom attachment fittings, installing inspection holes and attachment bolt washers, modifying both access covers, and replacing broken attachment bolts.

David Villiers
Delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority

5 December 2008