Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2018L01206:reg:24:p2
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2018L01206
Segment Type: reg
Provision Reference: reg 24 (pt 2/3)
Character Range: 59832–63156

calculations that show that it satisfies the output representativeness criterion for each sub-unit (subsection 22(12));
 (i) details of the proposed project measurement period (or possible project measurement periods) with reasons for thinking that it will satisfy subsections 22(6) to (11);
 (j) reasons why the baseline period and proposed project measurement period will satisfy subsection 22(3) (limitation on concurrent maintenance or other work);
 (k)  the baseline emissions rate for each sub-unit (ERB,i and ERP,i), with a summary of the calculations;
 (l) a statement of the MVP's qualifications, showing that he or she satisfies section 26;
 (m) a statement that the MVP is satisfied that the IE unit and the proposed upgrade fulfil the requirements of this determination.
 (5) An MVP may provide a pre-upgrade declaration only if he or she is satisfied that:
 (a) he or she has received from the project proponent any information about the IE unit that he or she has requested in order to make the declaration; and
 (b) the information received is accurate and does not contain anything misleading.
Note: The information that the MVP will require in order to make the declaration, and will need to request if he or she does not already have it from involvement in implementing or testing the upgrade, is likely to include:
                    * a description of the project activities, including any changes to operating conditions compared to the baseline period
                    * a description of the energy boundary of the IE unit and any sub-units, including:
                             + the energy types consumed by each sub-unit
                             + any energy transfers between sub-units, such as heat transfers
                             + how energy inputs are measured
                             + an explanation of how proposed output measures were chosen, and why the output measure is appropriate
                             + total output data for the 12 months prior to the commissioning of the equipment
                             + details of any non-routine shutdown or startup events during the baseline period
                             + data for major variables or factors affecting energy performance of the IE unit, to enable an assessment of whether the average values of the following factors during the baseline and project measurement periods were comparable, including:
                                     o external factors, such as climate;
                                     o changes in input or output quality and type that materially affect energy consumption;
                                     o changes to the fuel mix
                                     o regular operating schedules, including start-ups and shutdowns
                                     o operating procedures or practices, beyond project activities
                    * an outline of any planned or scheduled changes to IE unit equipment during the crediting period
                    * if any time intervals were excised from the measurement period under subsection22(7)—reasons why this did not affect the representativeness of the measurement period for subsection 22(11)
                    * details of the proposed project measurement period.
Note: The actions the