Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2021L01869:reg:6:p62
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2021L01869
Segment Type: reg
Provision Reference: reg 6 (pt 62/86)
Character Range: 211377–214327

that may have an impact on the heritage values of the place

      * the result of monitoring programs, where they indicate that the policies contained in the plan do not achieve the stated management objectives.

  The plan will remain in force until such time as a new plan is adopted.
       10.2.1.  Summary of previous review processes

2013 Review

  In 2013 the first version of this Heritage Management Plan was reviewed by Old Parliament House staff. The main factors involved in the review were:

      * extensive consultation with Old Parliament House staff and key stakeholders (for example, the National Capital Authority and the Department of Environment) regarding the implementation and effectiveness of the 2008–2013 plan

      * notices inviting comment from the public published in a daily newspaper and on the agency website or social media sites

      * research on the implementation of the plan

      * an external assessment of the condition of the place in relation to heritage values as of 2013.

  The feedback and results gained from these processes informed the amendments that in turn became the second version of this plan. Much of the feedback centred on the refinement of the implementation tools for the plan, with very little suggestion that policies and zones should be changed.

2020 Review

  In 2020 a review was undertaken of the second version of this plan. The plan was reviewed Old Parliament House staff. The main factors involved in the review were:

      * extensive consultation with Old Parliament House staff, volunteers and key stakeholders (for example, the National Capital Authority and the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment) regarding the implementation and effectiveness of the 2015–2020 plan

      * notices inviting comment from the public published in a daily newspaper and on the agency web and social media sites

      * review of the Action Proposal Process

      * development of the Heritage Management Interactive to improve the Action Proposal web form

      * integration of subsidiary management documents with the Heritage Management Plan, including the Old Parliament House management strategies

      * an external assessment of the condition of the place in relation to heritage values as of 2020.

  The feedback and results from these processes informed the amendments that in turn became the third version of this plan. Much of the feedback centred on the refinement of the implementation tools for the plan. Very few changes were made to the policies and zones.

PART C: MANAGEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS

  Part C of the plan outlines the management tools and associated implementation processes.

      * Chapter 11: Action Proposal Process sets out this key decision-making tool which is designed to implement the conservation policies and fulfil statutory requirements.

      * Chapter 12:The Permitted Action Schedule lists those actions