Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:C2021A00098:clause:1_27ka:p1
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:C2021A00098
Segment Type: clause
Provision Reference: sch 1 cl 27KA (pt 1/2)
Character Range: 6564–9258

27KA  Application for data disruption warrant
 (1) A law enforcement officer of the Australian Federal Police or the Australian Crime Commission (or another person on the law enforcement officer's behalf) may apply for the issue of a data disruption warrant if the law enforcement officer suspects on reasonable grounds that:
 (a) one or more relevant offences of a particular kind have been, are being, are about to be, or are likely to be, committed; and
 (b) those offences involve, or are likely to involve, data held in a computer (the target computer); and
 (c) disruption of data held in the target computer is likely to substantially assist in frustrating the commission of one or more relevant offences that:
 (i) involve, or are likely to involve, data held in the target computer; and
 (ii) are of the same kind as the relevant offences referred to in paragraph (a).

Procedure for making applications
 (2) An application under subsection (1) may be made to an eligible Judge or to a nominated AAT member.
 (3) An application:
 (a) must specify:
 (i) the name of the applicant; and
 (ii) the nature and duration of the warrant sought; and
 (b) subject to this section, must be supported by an affidavit setting out:
 (i) the grounds on which the warrant is sought; and
 (ii) the things proposed to be authorised by the warrant in accordance with section 27KE; and
 (iii) an assessment of how disruption of data held in the target computer is likely to substantially assist as described in paragraph (1)(c), to the extent that such an assessment is possible; and
 (iv) an assessment of the likelihood that disruption of data held in the target computer will substantially assist as described in paragraph (1)(c), to the extent that such an assessment is possible.

Unsworn applications
 (4) If a law enforcement officer believes that:
 (a) immediate disruption of data held in the target computer referred to in subsection (1) is likely to substantially assist as described in paragraph (1)(c); and
 (b) it is impracticable for an affidavit to be prepared or sworn before an application for a warrant is made;
an application for a warrant under subsection (1) may be made before an affidavit is prepared or sworn.
 (5) If subsection (4) applies, the applicant must:
 (a) provide as much information as the eligible Judge or nominated AAT member considers is reasonably practicable in the circumstances; and
 (b) not later than 72 hours after the making of the application, send a duly sworn affidavit to the eligible Judge or nominated AAT member, whether or not a warrant has been issued.

Target computer
 (6) The target computer referred to in subsection (1) may be any one or more