Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2024C00347:reg:9:p15
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2024C00347
Segment Type: reg
Provision Reference: reg 9 (pt 15/18)
Character Range: 56263–58885

after the date that the safety case was first accepted under regulation 2.26; and
 (b) five years after the date of each acceptance of a revised safety case under regulation 2.34;
whether or not a revision under regulation 2.30 or 2.31 has been accepted within the 5 year period.
 (2) A revised safety case submitted under this regulation must describe the means by which the operator will ensure the ongoing integrity of the technical and other control measures identified by the formal safety assessment for the facility.

2.33  NOPSEMA may request more information
 (1) If an operator submits a revised safety case to NOPSEMA, NOPSEMA may request the operator to provide further written information about any matter required by these Regulations to be included in a safety case.
 (2) A request under subregulation (1) must:
 (a) be in writing; and
 (b) set out each matter for which information is requested; and
 (c) specify a period of not less than 10 days within which the information is to be provided.
 (3) If an operator receives a request and provides all information requested by NOPSEMA within the period specified:
 (a) the information becomes part of the revised safety case as if it had been included with the revised safety case as it was submitted to NOPSEMA; and
 (b) NOPSEMA must have regard to the information as if it had been so included.

2.34  Acceptance or rejection of a revised safety case
 (1) NOPSEMA must accept a revised safety case if:
 (a) the revised safety case is appropriate to the facility and to the activities conducted at the facility; and
 (b) the revised safety case complies with Subdivisions A, B and C of Division 1 for each stage in the life of the facility in respect of which the revision is submitted; and
 (c) the revised safety case complies with Subdivision D of Division 1; and
 (d) in a case on which NOPSEMA has required a validation relating to a proposed modification:
 (i) the person, or each person, undertaking the validation meets the criteria specified in subregulation 2.40(5); and
 (ii) the validation complies with regulation 2.40.
 (2) If a safety case is revised in relation to more than 1 stage in the life of the facility, NOPSEMA may accept the revised safety case for 1 or more stages in the life of the facility and reject the revised safety case for 1 or more stages in the life of the facility.
 (3) If NOPSEMA rejects a safety case because NOPSEMA is not satisfied as to any of the matters mentioned in subregulation (1), NOPSEMA must give the operator a reasonable opportunity to change the safety case and resubmit it.
 (4) NOPSEMA must reject