Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:C2024C00749:section:46a:p6
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:C2024C00749
Segment Type: section
Provision Reference: s 46A (pt 6/10)
Character Range: 302266–305035

the AFP Minister (or a legal representative of the AFP Minister); and
 (d) how much the use of such methods would be likely to assist in determining whether to apply for the post‑sentence order; and
 (e) how much the use of such methods would be likely to prejudice determining whether to apply for the post‑sentence order, whether because of delay or for any other reasons; and
 (f) in relation to an application by an interception agency of Victoria—any submissions made by the Victorian PIM under section 44A to the Judge or nominated ART member; and
 (g) in relation to an application by an interception agency of Queensland—any submissions made by the Queensland PIM under section 45 to the Judge or nominated ART member.

Warrant for community safety supervision order
 (2E) If a Part 9.10 warrant agency applies to an eligible Judge or nominated ART member for a warrant in respect of a person and the Judge or nominated ART member is satisfied, on the basis of the information given to the Judge or nominated ART member under this Part in connection with the application, that:
 (a) Division 3 has been complied with in relation to the application; and
 (b) in the case of a telephone application—because of urgent circumstances, it was necessary to make the application by telephone; and
 (c) there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that a particular person is using, or is likely to use, more than one telecommunications service; and
 (d) a community safety supervision order is in force in relation to the person; and
 (e) information that would be likely to be obtained by intercepting under a warrant:
 (i) communications made to or from any telecommunications service that the person is using, or is likely to use; or
 (ii) communications made by means of a particular telecommunications device or particular telecommunications devices that the person is using, or is likely to use;
  would be likely to substantially assist in connection with:
 (iii) achieving a Part 9.10 object; or
 (iv) determining whether the community safety supervision order, or any succeeding community safety supervision order, has been, or is being, complied with; and
 (f) having regard to the matters referred to in subsection (2F), and to no other matters, the Judge or nominated ART member should issue a warrant authorising such communications to be intercepted;
the Judge or nominated ART member may, in the Judge or member's discretion, issue such a warrant.
Note 1: Subsection (3) restricts the issuing of a warrant authorising interception of communications made by means of a telecommunications device or telecommunications devices identified in the warrant.
Note 2: For community safety supervision orders that have been made but not come into force, see section