Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2019L00157:body:0:p23
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2019L00157
Segment Type: other
Provision Reference: 
Character Range: 110977–114481

•    nuclear actions (including uranium mines)

                                                     •    a water resource, in relation to coal seam gas development and large coal mining development (DEWHA, 2013).
Phytophthora dieback                               Plant disease caused by Phytophthora species.

Priority biodiversity assets       Matters of national environmental significance listed under the EPBC Act, such as threatened species and ecological communities; and other plants, animals, communities and vegetation landscapes prioritised under Objective 1 of this Plan for protection or remediation.
Risk                               The chance that Phytophthora will result in adverse impacts on vulnerable values or assets.
Susceptibility                     The level of resilience of a species, community, ecosystem or landscape to impact from Phytophthora.
Threat                             The known location or source, extent and severity of Phytophthora dieback in an area and its proximity to uninfested susceptible areas.
Threat abatement plan              Under the EPBC Act (section 270A), a plan providing for research, management, and any other actions necessary to reduce the impact of a listed key threatening process on a threatened species or ecological community.
Threatened ecological community    An ecological community listed under the EPBC Act as critically endangered, endangered or vulnerable.
Threatened species                 A species listed under the EPBC Act as critically endangered, endangered, vulnerable or conservation dependent.
Threatening process                A process that threatens or may threaten the survival, abundance or evolutionary development of a native species or ecological community.
Vulnerability                      The sum of susceptibility and hazards in an area, which provides a measure of exposure to the likelihood of being harmed.

            5.      References

         Aberton M, Wilson BA & Cahill DM (1999) The use of phosphite as a control for Phytophthora cinnamomi in native vegetation at Anglesea, Victoria. Australasian Plant Pathology 28, 225–234.

         Aberton MJ, Wilson BA, Hill J & Cahill DM (2003) Phosphite controls Phytophthora cinnamomi at Anglesea and Wilson's Promontory National Park, Victoria, in McComb JA, Hardy GEStJ & Tommerup IC (Eds), Phytophthora in forests and natural ecosystems: Proceedings of the 2nd International Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO) working party 7.02.09 meeting, Albany, Western Australia, 30 September – 5 October 2001. Murdoch University Print, Murdoch, Western Australia. p. 244.

         Barrett S & Rathbone D (2018) Long-term phosphite application maintains species assemblages, richness and structure of plant communities invaded by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Austral Ecology. Available at: doi.org/10.1111/aec.12574.

         Barrett S, Shearer BL, Crane CE & Cochrane A (2008) An extinction-risk-assessment tool for flora threatened by
         Phytophthora cinnamomi. Australian Journal of Botany 56, 477–486.

         Beeton RJS, Buckley KI, Jones GJ, Morgan D, Reichelt RE & Trewin D (2006) Australia state of the environment 2006. Independent report to the Australian Government Minister for the Environment and Heritage, Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory.

         Centre for Phytophthora Science and Management (CPSM) (2006) Review and evaluation of the 2001 national threat abatement plan for