Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2024L01095:body:0:p50
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2024L01095
Segment Type: other
Provision Reference: 
Character Range: 197331–200387

intended to stimulate tourism as well as benefit the species.

Malleefowl are also important culturally to Traditional Owners. Traditional Owner Ranger groups and their Prescribed Body Corporates present an opportunity for engagement and partnership to undertake Malleefowl survey and monitoring work.

There are likely to be few adverse social or economic impacts of this recovery plan and no specific geographic areas have been identified where recommended actions would disadvantage any social or economic interest. Legislation for native vegetation retention and threatened species protection already exist in all states, and no additional social and economic impacts are likely to occur from the implementation of this plan. For example, mineral sands mining is restricted by existing legislation in areas occupied by Malleefowl, particularly where there is a clear net loss for Malleefowl conservation.

Some negative economic impacts may occur where stock are excluded from areas that harbour Malleefowl, although these impacts are likely to be minor as habitats favoured by Malleefowl are generally of poor quality for stock. We believe the benefits gained from such exclusions in the conservation of a range of threatened species outweigh these losses in the long term.

Some negative economic impacts may also occur if tighter restrictions are placed on the eucalyptus and broombush harvesting industries in an effort to manage these areas in a way that is more sympathetic to the conservation of Malleefowl and other species. These areas tend to be relatively small, but the benefit of improved management to the regional conservation of Malleefowl in some cases would be substantial and would outweigh short-term economic losses.

Unforeseen adverse effects will be avoided through consultation with interested parties.

11 Organisations/persons involved in evaluating the performance of
the plan

This plan should be reviewed no later than five years from when it was endorsed and made publicly available. The review will determine the performance of the plan and assess:

       * whether the plan continues unchanged, is varied to remove completed actions or varied to include new conservation priorities, or
       * whether a recovery plan is no longer necessary for the species as conservation advice will suffice or the species is recommended for removal from the threatened species list.

The review should be coordinated in association with relevant Australian and state government agencies and key stakeholder groups such as non-governmental organisations, local community groups and scientific research organisations.

12 References
Albrecht GA (2019). Earth Emotions: New Words for a New World, pp 4–5. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, USA.

Aṉangu Pitjantjatjara Yankuntjatjara Land Management Nganamara Fact Sheet

Australian National University (2017). Meanings and origins of Australian words and idioms. School of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, ANU College of Arts and Social Sciences.

Barker RD & Vestjens WJ (1981).