Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2024L00006:reg:3:p48
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2024L00006
Segment Type: reg
Provision Reference: reg 3 (pt 48/58)
Character Range: 203875–207129

from when it was endorsed and made publicly available. The review will determine the performance of the plan and assess:
   •      whether the plan continues unchanged, is varied to remove completed actions, or
   varied to include new conservation priorities; or
   •      whether a recovery plan is no longer necessary for the species as either conservation advice will suffice, or the species are removed from the threatened species list.

 As part of this review, the listing status of the species will be assessed against the
 EPBC Act species listing criteria.

 The review will be coordinated by the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (Commonwealth) in association with relevant Australian and state government agencies and key stakeholder groups such as non-governmental organisations, local community groups and scientific research organisations.

 Key stakeholders who may be involved in the review of the performance of the Recovery Plan, include organisations likely to be affected by the actions proposed in this plan and are expected to include:

Australian Government
   •      Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water.
   •      Parks Australia.
   •      Department of Defence – Australian Defence Force.

State/territory governments
   •      New South Wales – Department of Planning and Environment, National Parks and Wildlife Service.

   •      Queensland – Department of Environment and Science.

   •      Victoria – Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning; Parks Victoria.
   •      Regional natural resource management organisations (NSW and Vic).
   •      Local governments

           Other
•      BirdLife Australia.
•      Emergency services (e.g., CFA).
•      Traditional owners.
•      Industry.
•      Local communities.
•      Local conservation groups.
•      Northern Eastern Bristlebird Working Group.

•      Private landholders.
•      Regional natural resource management organisations (Qld).
•      RSPCA.
•      Sydney Water.
•      Universities and other research organisations.
•      Wildlife health practitioners.
•      Zoos and Aquarium Association.

       13.  References

 Bain D (2007) Two potential sexing techniques for the Eastern Bristlebird Dasyornis brachypterus. Australian Zoologist 34, 1, 92–96.

 Bain DW, Baker JR, French KO & Whelan RJ (2008) Post-fire recovery of eastern bristlebirds (Dasyornis brachypterus) is context-dependent. Wildlife Research 35 1, 44–49.

 Bain D, Clarke RH, Oliver D, Bramwell MD, MacGregor C, Lindenmayer DB, Maple D, Dexter N, Ehmke G, Burbidge AH, Menkhorst PW & Garnett ST (2021) Southern Eastern Bristlebird Dasyornis brachypterus brachypterus. In The Action Plan for
 Australian Birds 2020. (Eds ST Garnett and GB Baker) pp. 584–587. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne.

 Bain D & McPhee N (2005) Resurveys of the Eastern Bristlebird Dasyornis brachypterus in central-eastern New South Wales 1999–2001: their relationship with fire and observer competence. Corella 29, 1–6.

 Baker J (1997) The decline, response to fire, status, and management of the Eastern Bristlebird. Pacific Conservation Biology 3, 3, 235–243.

 Baker J (1998) Ecotones and fire and the conservation of the endangered