Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:C2025C00037:section:49:p4
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:C2025C00037
Segment Type: section
Provision Reference: s 49 (pt 4/5)
Character Range: 331727–334330

in the computer in:
 (i) achieving a Part 5.3 object; or
 (ii) determining whether the Part 5.3 supervisory order has been, or is being, complied with; and
 (b) the general use to be made of any evidence or information obtained by access to data held in the computer.
 (2CA) For the purposes of subparagraph (2B)(b)(ixa), the details are:
 (a) if the warrant was issued to determine whether to apply for a Part 9.10 order—the benefit of obtaining access to data held in the computer in determining whether to make the application; and
 (b) if the warrant was issued on the basis of a community safety supervision order that is or was in force in relation to a person—the benefit of obtaining access to data held in the computer in:
 (i) achieving a Part 9.10 object; or
 (ii) determining whether the community safety supervision order has been, or is being, complied with; and
 (c) the general use to be made of any evidence or information obtained by access to data held in the computer.
 (2D) In the case of:
 (a) a data disruption warrant for disruption of data held in a computer; or
 (b) an emergency authorisation for disruption of data held in a computer;
the report must:
 (c) state whether the warrant or authorisation was executed; and
 (d) if so:
 (i) state the name of the person primarily responsible for the execution of the warrant or authorisation; and
 (ii) state the name of each person involved in accessing or disrupting data under the warrant or authorisation; and
 (iii) state the period during which the data was accessed or disrupted; and
 (iv) state the name, if known, of any person whose data was accessed or disrupted; and
 (v) give details of any premises at which the computer was located; and
 (vi) give details of the benefit of the use of the warrant or authorisation in frustrating criminal activity; and
 (vii) give details of the access to, and disruption of, data under the warrant or authorisation; and
 (viii) give details of the compliance with the conditions (if any) to which the warrant or authorisation was subject; and
 (e) if the warrant or authorisation was extended or varied, state:
 (i) the number of extensions or variations; and
 (ii) the reasons for them.
 (2E) In the case of a network activity warrant for access to data held in a computer, the report must:
 (a) state whether the warrant was executed; and
 (b) if so:
 (i) state the name of the person primarily responsible for the execution of the warrant; and
 (ii) state the name of each person involved in accessing data under the warrant; and
 (iii) state the period during which the data was