Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2023L01628:clause:1_1:p1
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2023L01628
Segment Type: clause
Provision Reference: sch 1 cl 1 (pt 1/2)
Character Range: 9041–11995

1  Authorisation
 (1) I, [name], *an eligible Judge/*a nominated AAT member within the meaning of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (the Act), acting under section 46 of the Act, authorise interceptions of communications made to or from the telecommunications service mentioned above.
 (2) I am satisfied, on the basis of the information given to me by the applicant agency, that:
 (a) Division 3 of Part 2‑5 of the Act has been complied with in relation to the application for this warrant; and
 *(b) because of urgent circumstances, it was necessary to make the application by telephone; and
 (c) there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the particular *person/*persons mentioned above *is/*are using, or *is/*are likely to use, the service; and
 (d) *a community safety supervision order is/*community safety supervision orders are in force (including because of section 6UA of the Act) in relation to *the particular person/*each of the particular persons mentioned above; and
 (e) information that would be likely to be obtained by intercepting under a warrant communications made to or from the service would be likely to substantially assist in connection with:
 *(i) achieving a Part 9.10 object; or
 *(ii) determining whether the community safety supervision *order/*orders, or any succeeding community safety supervision order *order/*orders, *has/*have been, or *is/*are being, complied with.
Note: For paragraph (2)(d), section 6UA of the Act deems community safety supervision orders to be in force if they have been made but not yet come into force.
 (3) I am satisfied, on the basis of the information given to me by the applicant agency, that the warrant should be issued having regard to the following matters only:
 (a) how much the privacy of any person or persons would be likely to be interfered with by intercepting under a warrant communications made to or from the service;
 (b) how much the information referred to in paragraph (2)(e) would be likely to assist in connection with:
 (i) achieving a Part 9.10 object; or
 (ii) determining whether the community safety supervision *order/*orders, or any succeeding community safety supervision *order/*orders, *has/*have been, or *is/*are being, complied with;
 (c) to what extent methods for:
 (i) achieving a Part 9.10 object; or
 (ii) determining whether the community safety supervision *order/*orders, or any succeeding community safety supervision order/*orders, *has/*have been, or *is/*are being, complied with;
  that do not involve so intercepting communications have been used by, or are available to, the applicant agency;
 (d) how much the use of such methods would be likely to assist in connection with:
 (i) achieving a Part 9.10 object; or
 (ii) determining whether the community safety supervision *order/*orders, or any succeeding community safety supervision *order/*orders, *has/*have been, or *is/*are being, complied with;
 (e)