Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2007L01320:body:0:p17
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2007L01320
Segment Type: other
Provision Reference: 
Character Range: 47999–51348

by participating biologist), and monitoring the implementation of the communication strategy.
There will be an external review after four years of Recovery Plan implementation.

10. Interests that will be affected by the Recovery Plan's implementation

       * SA Department for Environment and Heritage
       * Vic Department of Sustainability and Environment; Parks Victoria
       * ForestrySA
       * Vic CMAs: Wimmera and Glenelg-Hopkins; SA NRM: South-East
       * Local Governments: Vic: West Wimmera, Glenelg and Horsham Shires; SA: Grant, Tattyara, Naracoorte-Lucindale, and Wattle Range District Councils
       * Private landholders, leaseholders and 22 Landcare Groups
       * Indigenous people (including Goolum Goolum, Kungari Assoc, SE Nungas Community Organisation, Tattyara Aboriginal Heritage Consultancy, traditional owners – Wadjaballick and Gundij-mara
       * Non-government reserve management and covenanting organisations
       * Non-government organisations such as bird clubs and field naturalists clubs
       * Research organisations such as universities

This list of stakeholders covers the main bodies but should not be considered exhaustive. There may be other interest groups which need to be considered when particular tasks need to be undertaken.

11. Social and economic impacts

The main potential impacts on landholders are covered by existing legislation for native vegetation retention in Victoria and South Australia.  Protection of habitat by determining authorities when considering clearing applications could result in economic impacts on a small number of individuals by restricting the development of areas for cropping.

Restrictions on timber harvesting within known nesting areas will have minor economic impacts as most such areas are currently excluded from harvesting or no longer contain suitable timber. Exclusion of harvesting of firewood from known habitat on public lands will possibly have an economic impact on local communities. Any exclusion of harvesting on these reserves will force individuals to use alternative fuel sources or buy firewood at commercial rates.

Fencing will allow areas to recover from continual grazing resulting in an increase in plant and structural diversity. Fencing areas on private land to exclude grazing may result in some small economic impact, however, the benefits gained from structurally and floristically diverse woodlands should outweigh any losses.

12. References

   Attiwill, A.R. 1960. Red-tailed Black-Cockatoo in South-east of South Australia. South Australian Ornithologist 23: 37-38.
   Baird, R. 1986. Historical records of the Glossy Black-Cockatoo Calyptorhynchus lathami and the Red-tailed Black-Cockatoo C. magnificus on south-eastern Australia.  South Australian Ornithologist 30: 38-45.
   Barrett, G., Silcocks, A., Barry, S., Cunningham, R. And Poulter, R. 2003. The New Atlas of Australian Birds. RAOU, Melbourne.
   Beumer, W. 2003. South -eastern Red-tailed Black-Cockatoos – flagship for the Greater Green Triangle. A survey of landholders' understanding of and attitudes towards the conservation of the South-eastern Red-tailed Black-Cockatoo. Unpublished Report to the Red-tailed Black-Cockatoo Recovery Team.
   Burnard, T. And Hill, R. 2002. Draft South-eastern Red-tailed Black-Cockatoo Recovery Plan. Birds