Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2025C00115:reg:3:p14
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2025C00115
Segment Type: reg
Provision Reference: reg 3 (pt 14/26)
Character Range: 390719–393210

child order in force in relation to the visa holder;
 (ea) in the case of a Subclass 601 (Electronic Travel Authority) visa—that, despite the grant of the visa, the Minister is satisfied that the visa holder:
 (i) did not have, at the time of the grant of the visa, an intention only to stay in, or visit, Australia temporarily for the tourism or business purposes for which the visa was granted; or
 (ii) has ceased to have that intention;
 (f) in the case of:
 (i) the holder of an Electronic Travel Authority (Class UD) visa who is under 18 and is not accompanied by his or her parent or guardian; or
 (iii) the holder of a Tourist (Class TR) visa, that was applied for using a form 601E, who:
 (A) is under 18; and
 (B) is not accompanied by his or her parent or guardian; or
 (iv) the holder of a Visitor (Class TV) visa who is under 18 and is not accompanied by his or her parent or guardian; or
 (v) the holder of a Subclass 600 (Visitor) visa in the Tourist stream, that was applied for using form 1419 (Internet), who is under 18 and is not accompanied by his or her parent or guardian;
  that the holder of that visa does not have adequate funds, or adequate arrangements have not been made, for the holder's maintenance, support and general welfare during the holder's proposed visit in Australia;
 (g) in the case of a temporary visa held by a person other than a visa holder mentioned in paragraph (h)—that the visa holder asks the Minister, in writing, to cancel the visa;
 (h) in the case of a temporary visa held by a person who is under the age of 18 years and is not a spouse, a former spouse or engaged to be married—that:
 (i) a person who is at least 18 years of age, and who can lawfully determine where the visa holder is to live, asks the Minister, in writing, to cancel the visa; and
 (ii) the Minister is satisfied that there is no compelling reason to believe that the cancellation of the visa would not be in the best interests of the visa holder;
 (i) in the case of the holder of:
 (i) a Subclass 456 (Business (Short Stay)) visa; or
 (ia) a Subclass 459 (Sponsored Business Visitor (Short Stay)) visa; or
 (ib) a Subclass 600 (Visitor) visa in the Business Visitor stream; or
 (ii) a Subclass 956 (Electronic Travel Authority (Business Entrant—Long Validity)) visa; or
 (iii) a Subclass 977 (Electronic Travel Authority (Business Entrant—Short Validity)) visa—
  that, despite the grant of the visa, the Minister is satisfied that the visa holder did not have,