Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2024C00490:reg:12:p28
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2024C00490
Segment Type: reg
Provision Reference: reg 12 (pt 28/34)
Character Range: 93427–96181

affidavit, on each person directly affected by the appeal.
 (5) As soon as practicable after being served with a copy of the originating process, or interlocutory process, and any supporting affidavit, a person whose act, omission or decision is being appealed against must file an affidavit:
 (a) stating the basis on which the act, omission or decision was done or made; and
 (b) annexing or exhibiting a copy of all relevant documents that have not been put in evidence by the person instituting the appeal.

Division 15—Proceedings under the ASIC Act

15.1  Reference to Court of question of law arising at hearing of ASIC (ASIC Act s 61)
  Part 38 applies, with any necessary adaptations, to a reference of a question of law arising at a hearing by ASIC to the Court under section 61 of the ASIC Act.

15.3  Application for inquiry (ASIC Act s 70, s 201, s 219)
  An application for an inquiry under subsection 70(3), 201(3) or 219(7) of the ASIC Act must be made by filing an originating process seeking an inquiry and orders under the relevant subsection.

Division 15A—Proceedings under the Cross‑Border Insolvency Act

15A.1  Application of this Division and other rules of the Court
  Unless the Court otherwise orders:
 (a) this Division applies to a proceeding in the Court, under the Cross‑Border Insolvency Act, involving a debtor other than an individual; and
 (b) the rules in the other Divisions of these Rules, and the other rules of the Court, apply to a proceeding in the Court under the Cross‑Border Insolvency Act if they are relevant and not inconsistent with this Division.
Note: See rule 1.5 for definitions of Cross‑Border Insolvency Act and Model Law.

15A.2  Expressions used in the Cross‑Border Insolvency Act
 (1) Unless the contrary intention appears, an expression that is used in this Division and in the Cross‑Border Insolvency Act, whether or not a particular meaning is given to the expression by the Cross‑Border Insolvency Act, has the same meaning in this Division as it has in the Cross‑Border Insolvency Act.
Note: The following expressions used in this Division (including in the notes to this Division) are defined in the Model Law as having the following meanings:
 establishment means any place of operations where the debtor carries out a non‑transitory economic activity with human means and goods or services.
 foreign court means a judicial or other authority competent to control or supervise a foreign proceeding.
 foreign main proceeding means a foreign proceeding taking place in the State where the debtor has the centre of its main interests.
 foreign non‑main proceeding means a foreign proceeding, other than a foreign main proceeding, taking place in a State where the debtor has an establishment