Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2024L00408:reg:2013:p15
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2024L00408
Segment Type: reg
Provision Reference: reg 2013 (pt 15/18)
Character Range: 1447648–1450598

actually support them;
     * general update of figures and images (eg. up to date images/pictures should be used in the descriptive sections);
     * consider the relationship of this plan with other plans (ie. for the Parliament House Vista and Australian War Memorial), including those to be updated, depending on if they are finished/available.  The aim being to achieve compatibility/integration;
     * revise Chapter 1 to address the conduct of the current project and project limitations;
     * general check/update of description and condition, including condition and integrity issues (Sections 2.2 and 8.5) – because of changes since the original plan was completed.  This included a discussion of impacts as a result of changes, but such discussion is not a full heritage impact assessment.  This also entailed a site inspection;
     * update overview history with events after the original plan was completed (Chapter 3);
     * revise significance in the light of new evidence, if any, and analysis, if needed (Chapters 6 and 7);
     * revise significance to address any differences between the plan and the National Heritage and Commonwealth Heritage values (Chapters 6 and 7).  This task is related to the task above about integrating such values into the plan;
     * check/update National Capital Plan requirements (Section 8.2 and Appendix E);
     * stakeholders – check if any new stakeholders to consider/or stakeholder views to update, and consult as needed (Section 8.3);
     * update NCA aspirations at Section 8.4 – given passage of time, including meetings with NCA business areas;
     * update management issues (Section 8.4);
     * review policies – especially identify any specific issues requiring specific policy guidance and include such guidance (Chapter 9) – partly because of passage of time/partly because of experience in using the plan over the years;
     * update priority works (Appendix F) – given passage of time, etc;  and
     * update with latest version (2013) of Burra Charter (Appendix H).

In undertaking this review and update work, as noted, consultations were also held with key NCA staff responsible for management of the place, in part to ascertain the effectiveness of the 2013 plan and any issues to be addressed in the update work.  Site inspections were another important aspect of the review.

A workshop was also held with key NCA staff to generally discuss heritage management plans.  The workshop sought to consider whether plans were effective for the NCA, what aspects of plans worked well, and what aspects were problematic.  Relevant workshop outcomes are integrated with the text below.

An assessment of whether the plan addresses the matters prescribed in the regulations including being consistent with the National Heritage management principles

The 2013 plan addressed matters prescribed in the regulations including the National Heritage management principles, and the