Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2023C01116:body:0:p8
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2023C01116
Segment Type: other
Provision Reference: 
Character Range: 21199–24594

made by the engagement team and the conclusions reached thereon;

(b)                The responsibilities of the engagement partner in relation to the engagement quality review, including that the engagement partner is precluded from dating the engagement report until notification has been received from the engagement quality reviewer in accordance with paragraph 27 that the engagement quality review is complete; and (Ref: Para. A25–A26)

(c)                Circumstances when the nature and extent of engagement team discussions with the engagement quality reviewer about a significant judgement give rise to a threat to the objectivity of the engagement quality reviewer, and appropriate actions to take in these circumstances. (Ref: Para. A27)

25.               In performing the engagement quality review, the engagement quality reviewer shall: (Ref: Para. A28–A33)

(a)                Read, and obtain an understanding of, information communicated by: (Ref: Para. A34)

(i)                 The engagement team regarding the nature and circumstances of the engagement and the entity; and

(ii)               The firm related to the firm's monitoring and remediation process, in particular identified deficiencies that may relate to, or affect, the areas involving significant judgements made by the engagement team.

(b)                Discuss with the engagement partner and, if applicable, other members of the engagement team, significant matters and significant judgements made in planning, performing and reporting on the engagement. (Ref: Para. A35–A38)

(c)                Based on the information obtained in (a) and (b), review selected engagement documentation relating to the significant judgements made by the engagement team and evaluate: (Ref: Para. A39–A43)

(i)                 The basis for making those significant judgements, including, when applicable to the type of engagement, the exercise of professional scepticism by the engagement team;

(ii)               Whether the engagement documentation supports the conclusions reached; and

(iii)             Whether the conclusions reached are appropriate.

(d)                For audits of a financial report, evaluate the basis for the engagement partner's determination that relevant ethical requirements relating to independence have been fulfilled. (Ref: Para. A44)

(e)                Evaluate whether appropriate consultation has taken place on difficult or contentious matters or matters involving differences of opinion and the conclusions arising from those consultations. (Ref: Para. A45)

(f)                 For audits of  financial reports, evaluate the basis for the engagement partner's determination that the engagement partner's involvement has been sufficient and appropriate throughout the audit engagement such that the engagement partner has the basis for determining that the significant judgements made and the conclusions reached are appropriate given the nature and circumstances of the engagement. (Ref: Para. A46)

(g)                Review:

(i)                 For audits of  financial reports, the financial reports and the auditor's report thereon, including, if applicable, the description of the key audit matters; (Ref: Para. A47)

(ii)               For review engagements, the financial report or financial information and the engagement report thereon; or (Ref: Para. A47)

(iii)