Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2023L01628:clause:1_1:p2
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2023L01628
Segment Type: clause
Provision Reference: sch 1 cl 1 (pt 2/2)
Character Range: 47515–49023

use of a warrant issued under section 46A of the Act in relation to the named person have been used by, or are available to, the applicant agency;
 (d) how much the use of such methods would be likely to assist in connection with determining whether to apply for the Part 9.10 order;
 (e) how much the use of such methods would be likely to prejudice determining whether to apply for the Part 9.10 order, whether because of delay or for any other reason;
 (f) whether intercepting under a warrant communications referred to in paragraph (a) would be the method that is likely to have the least interference with any person's privacy;
 *(g) [if the applicant agency is an interception agency of Victoria] any submissions made by the Victorian PIM under section 44A of the Act to me;
 *(h) [if the applicant agency is an interception agency of Queensland] any submissions made by the Queensland PIM under section 45 of the Act to me.
 (4) I am satisfied that:
*there are no other practicable methods available to the applicant agency at the time of making the application to identify the telecommunications services used, or likely to be used, by the named person.
*interception of communications made to or from a telecommunications service used, or likely to be used, by the named person would not otherwise be practicable.
 (5) This warrant is issued to determine whether to make an application for a Part 9.10 order in relation to [the name of the person in relation to whom the application would be made].