Document ID: chunk:federal_register_of_legislation:F2024C00952:reg:8:p2
Version: federal_register_of_legislation:F2024C00952
Segment Type: reg
Provision Reference: reg 8 (pt 2/100)
Character Range: 56105–58938

by the direction;
 (b) agencies of the Commonwealth, a State or Territory whose operations in the port will be affected by the direction;
 (c) persons, other than those mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b), who need to implement, or comply with, the direction.
Examples: For paragraph (c), harbour masters and PSOs.

2.35  Giving and communicating security directions (Act s 33(5))
 (1) Subject to subsections 35(2) and 38(3) of the Act, the Secretary must give a security direction, or notify a person of the revocation of a security direction under subsection 38(2) of the Act:
 (a) orally (for example, by telephone or radio communication); or
 (b) in writing; or
 (c) by electronic transmission (for example, by fax or e‑mail).
Note: Under subsection 33(4) of the Act, a security direction has no effect until the Secretary commits the direction to writing.
 (2) Each of the following:
 (a) a port operator required to communicate a security direction under subsection 35(3) of the Act;
 (b) an offshore facility operator required to communicate a security direction under subsection 35(8) of the Act;
 (c) a ship operator required to communicate a security direction under subsection 36(2) of the Act;
must do so using any of the means set out in subregulation (1).

Part 3—Maritime security plans

Division 3.1—Preliminary

3.05  Common requirements for security assessments
  A security assessment for a maritime security plan must include the following matters:
 (a) the date when the assessment was completed or reviewed;
 (b) the scope of the assessment, including assets, infrastructure and operations assessed;
 (c) a summary of how the assessment was conducted, including details of the risk management process adopted;
 (d) the skills and experience of the key persons who completed or participated in the assessment.

3.10  Common requirements for security plan audits and reviews
  A maritime security plan for a port operator or port facility operator must set out:
 (a) a schedule of security plan audits; and
 (b) the circumstances, in addition to the occurrence of a maritime transport security incident, following which a security plan review must be conducted; and
 (c) the procedures for conducting a security plan audit, including a process for selecting auditors who are independent of the matters being audited; and
 (d) the procedures for conducting a security plan review, including a process for consultation during the review.

3.11  Common requirements for maps included with maritime security plans
 (1) A map mentioned in sections 49 or 52A of the Act must be A3 or A4 size, or in an electronic format, and include the following:
 (a) a title;
 (b) a linear scale;
 (c) a north point;
 (d) a legend;
 (e) if the map contains map projections—details of the projections;
 (f) if the maritime security plan