Datasets:
OmniCoder-9B: fastest code gen, same agent loop problems (2 new rows)
OmniCoder-9B agentic benchmark: fastest code generation, same agent loop problems (2 new rows)
tested Tesslate/OmniCoder-9B (dense 9B, based on Qwen3.5-9B, fine-tuned on 425K+ agentic coding trajectories) on our standard portscout + logpulse tasks via Pi agent framework.
setup
- model: OmniCoder-9B Q4_K_M (bartowski imatrix quant, 5.6 GB)
- server: llama-server (turboquant),
-rea offflag mandatory - framework: Pi coding agent (read/write/edit/bash tools)
- hardware: RTX 4060 Ti 8GB, Ryzen 5 7600X, 32 GB DDR5, WSL2
- decode speed: 42 tok/s (dense, fully in VRAM)
critical note: thinking mode must be disabled
with default settings, OmniCoder-9B burns 100% of tokens on reasoning_content and produces 0 code output. this is inherited from the Qwen3.5-9B base. the -rea off server flag disables thinking mode and routes output to content. without this flag, the model is completely unusable.
portscout (easy): PASS, fastest model tested
| metric | OmniCoder-9B | gpt-oss-20b | Qwopus 9B (Pi) | Qwen3.6 no-think |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| time | <1 min | ~3 min | ~8 min (loop) | 18 min |
| status | completed | completed | partial | completed |
| self-fixes | 0 | 1 | n/a | 0 |
| code lines | 83 | ~80 | ~70 | ~90 |
| tool calls | reliable | reliable | partial | reliable |
OmniCoder produced the cleanest first-shot output of any model: 83-line Python with ThreadPoolExecutor, as_completed, argparse with proper metavar/type hints, input validation for port ranges, and configurable thread count. no self-fixes needed, no rumination, no wasted tokens.
logpulse (hard): PARTIAL, agent stuck
all 3 files were created cleanly in one shot:
logpulse.py(111 lines): class-based watcher with file position tracking, regex pattern matching, stats (total lines, lines/sec, error count)generate_log.py(127 lines): configurable fake log generator with seed, append mode, level selectionREADME.md: usage docs with examples
two code bugs:
update_stats()callsread_new_lines()again (double-reads, double-counts)- generator only produces one log level per run instead of mixing INFO/WARN/ERROR randomly
the real failure was agent loop management:
- model ran
logpulse.py test.log(a blockingtail -fwatcher) without timeout or background flag - command hung indefinitely waiting for new log lines
- after user interrupted, model tried to debug but entered a 457s+ generation loop
- user killed the session
this is the exact same failure pattern as Qwopus 9B on Pi. the model doesn't understand that tail -f style commands block forever and need to be run in background or with a timeout.
key finding
agentic fine-tuning improves code generation quality but does NOT fix agent loop management. OmniCoder's 425K agentic trajectories made it the fastest and cleanest code generator we've tested, but the model still can't plan multi-step agent workflows involving blocking commands. code generation and agent orchestration are separate skills.
| capability | OmniCoder-9B | gpt-oss-20b |
|---|---|---|
| code generation speed | faster (<1 min vs ~3 min) | slower but still fast |
| code quality (first shot) | excellent (0 self-fixes) | good (1 self-fix) |
| agent loop management | fails on blocking commands | handles correctly |
| VRAM usage | 5.6 GB (dense) | 1.8 GB (MoE ncmoe=30) |
| thinking mode | must disable (-rea off) | not applicable |
gpt-oss-20b remains the winner for end-to-end agentic work. OmniCoder-9B could be a strong choice for single-shot code generation tasks where agent loop complexity is minimal.
data
rows 30-31 in agentic-coding-bench.jsonl. filter by model == "OmniCoder-9B".