prompt listlengths 2 2 | completion listlengths 1 1 | label bool 2
classes | reasoning stringlengths 213 11.3k | answer stringclasses 4
values | gt_answer stringclasses 3
values | paper_id stringclasses 300
values | anchor_id stringlengths 13 13 | bin int64 0 9 | input_gt float64 1 8.67 | anchor_gt float64 0.5 8 | similarity float64 0.68 0.92 | run_idx int64 0 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews. Review 1 is AI-generated (likely from a template) and says the paper is incomplete, cuts off mid-sentence, missing sections, etc. It gives a score of -100 and decision Error. But we are not asked to score, just to compare which paper is better based on the review... | false | We are given two reviews. Review 1 is AI-generated (likely from a template) and says the paper is incomplete, cuts off mid-sentence, missing sections, etc. It gives a score of -100 and decision Error. But we are not asked to score, just to compare which paper is better based on the reviews. Review 2 is human-written an... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | dHdXvu5ehy.md | 5 | 6.67 | 4.75 | 0.760485 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated and says the paper is incomplete (truncated), so it cannot be evaluated. The second paper (Review 2) has multiple human reviews, indicating it is a complete paper with some weaknesses but also s... | false | We need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated and says the paper is incomplete (truncated), so it cannot be evaluated. The second paper (Review 2) has multiple human reviews, indicating it is a complete paper with some weaknesses but also strengths. The first paper's rev... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | GFzmAKw3RW.md | 4 | 6.67 | 3.75 | 0.759844 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews. The first review is for a paper titled \"MXNET\" about estimating clique number. The review says the paper is severely truncated, missing entire sections including experiments. It gives a score of -100 and decision Error, meaning the paper is incomplete and canno... | false | We are given two reviews. The first review is for a paper titled "MXNET" about estimating clique number. The review says the paper is severely truncated, missing entire sections including experiments. It gives a score of -100 and decision Error, meaning the paper is incomplete and cannot be evaluated. The second review... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | XWfjugkXzN.md | 1 | 6.67 | 1.666667 | 0.743143 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews. Review 1 is about a paper called MXNET. The review states that the paper is severely truncated; the experiments and most method sections are missing. The reviewer says the paper cannot be evaluated and returns an error. Essentially, the paper as provided is incom... | false | We are given two reviews. Review 1 is about a paper called MXNET. The review states that the paper is severely truncated; the experiments and most method sections are missing. The reviewer says the paper cannot be evaluated and returns an error. Essentially, the paper as provided is incomplete, so it's not a valid pape... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | F8l0llkMk0.md | 3 | 6.67 | 3.333333 | 0.770122 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews. The first review is for a paper that is severely truncated, missing major sections. The review states it's incomplete and returns Error. The second review is for a paper that also seems incomplete, with human reviewers noting it's only an abstract and partial int... | false | We are given two reviews. The first review is for a paper that is severely truncated, missing major sections. The review states it's incomplete and returns Error. The second review is for a paper that also seems incomplete, with human reviewers noting it's only an abstract and partial introduction, lacking methods and ... | tie | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | 5lUdTogEL3.md | 0 | 6.67 | 1 | 0.773686 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is for a paper called \"MXNET\" about estimating clique number. The review states that the paper is severely truncated, missing most of the method details, all experiments, and references. The reviewer gives a dec... | false | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is for a paper called "MXNET" about estimating clique number. The review states that the paper is severely truncated, missing most of the method details, all experiments, and references. The reviewer gives a decision of "Error" and says the pap... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | AxYTFpdlvj.md | 2 | 6.67 | 2 | 0.761111 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first paper's review is AI-generated and indicates the paper is severely truncated (incomplete). The second paper's review is human-written and gives mixed feedback: some weaknesses but also strengths. The instruction says to ... | false | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first paper's review is AI-generated and indicates the paper is severely truncated (incomplete). The second paper's review is human-written and gives mixed feedback: some weaknesses but also strengths. The instruction says to evaluate the papers themselves,... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | XWfjugkXzN.md | 1 | 6.67 | 1.666667 | 0.743143 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review says the paper is incomplete and gives a decision of \"Error\" with score -100. The second review describes a paper about lifelong person re-identification, but the human reviewers all say the submitted manuscript... | false | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review says the paper is incomplete and gives a decision of "Error" with score -100. The second review describes a paper about lifelong person re-identification, but the human reviewers all say the submitted manuscript is incomplete (only abstract and... | tie | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | 5lUdTogEL3.md | 0 | 6.67 | 1 | 0.773686 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that.\n\nReview 1 (AI-generated) says the paper is incomplete: it is severely truncated, missing large secti... | false | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that.
Review 1 (AI-generated) says the paper is incomplete: it is severely truncated, missing large sections including experiments. It giv... | tie | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | 5lUdTogEL3.md | 0 | 6.67 | 1 | 0.773686 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review (for paper 1, MXNET) is AI-generated. The second review (for paper 2, \"On the Hölder Stability of Multiset and Graph Neural Networks\") is human-written. We need to determine which paper is better, accounting for... | true | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review (for paper 1, MXNET) is AI-generated. The second review (for paper 2, "On the Hölder Stability of Multiset and Graph Neural Networks") is human-written. We need to determine which paper is better, accounting for the fact that the AI reviewer ca... | 1 | 1 | DFSb67ksVr | P7KIGdgW8S.md | 9 | 6.67 | 8 | 0.739853 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated and describes a paper that is incomplete—the file is severely truncated, missing major sections including experiments. The review states the paper cannot be evaluated and gives a decision of \"E... | true | We need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated and describes a paper that is incomplete—the file is severely truncated, missing major sections including experiments. The review states the paper cannot be evaluated and gives a decision of "Error". This indicates the paper ... | 1 | 1 | DFSb67ksVr | P7KIGdgW8S.md | 9 | 6.67 | 8 | 0.739853 | 1 |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 45