The dataset viewer is not available because its heuristics could not detect any supported data files. You can try uploading some data files, or configuring the data files location manually.
arXiv AI Entity Graph — Models, Frameworks and Benchmarks in CS Research
Structured entity extraction from arXiv CS papers — every AI model, framework, benchmark, and dataset mentioned in paper titles and abstracts, normalized to canonical names with provider, family, and confidence metadata.
Coverage: January 2024 – present · Daily updates · 23 CS categories
Sample: January 2024 + January 2025 + June 2026 (10 days each)
What makes this different
- arXiv has 2 million papers. Anyone can read them. Nobody has turned them into a structured, normalized, daily-updating database of who's using what — until now.
- Every entity mention is normalized:
GPT-4,gpt4,GPT-4-turboall resolve to the same canonical row withfamily=GPT,provider=OpenAI,model_type=llm. Your queries don't need to handle aliases. - This is not a retrieval benchmark or a paper corpus. It is an analytics database — built to answer questions like "which models are researchers actually using?", "when did DeepSeek R1 go mainstream?", and "what benchmarks are used to evaluate GPT-4o?"
Key findings (Jan 2024 – Jun 2026)
- GPT dominates at 5,652 papers citing it across the full window — but Alibaba's Qwen family (Qwen3 + Qwen2.5 + Qwen combined = 4,723 papers) rivals OpenAI's total footprint in 2026
- DeepSeek R1: fastest adoption on record — 3 papers in January 2025, 48 in February (16x spike in one month), sustained at 50–90/month since
- o1 enters the top 20 at 620 papers — reasoning models are now mainstream research infrastructure, not a curiosity
- cs.CL overtook cs.LG as the dominant category — language research (27,452 entity rows) now exceeds pure ML (20,040)
- Stable Diffusion at 884 papers — image generation is a serious parallel research track to LLMs
Schema
entities — the core table
| Column | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
paper_id |
varchar | arXiv paper ID |
version |
int | Paper version |
paper_year |
int | Year derived from paper ID |
paper_month |
int | Month derived from paper ID |
entity_type |
varchar | model, framework, benchmark, dataset |
entity |
varchar | Canonical entity name |
confidence |
double | 1.0 = confirmed · 0.2 = ambiguous · 0.1 = likely false positive |
family |
varchar | Model family (e.g. GPT, Llama, Qwen) |
provider |
varchar | Provider (e.g. OpenAI, Meta, Alibaba) |
model_type |
varchar | llm, reasoning_llm, vlm, embedding, image_gen, speech, ssm |
domain |
varchar | Benchmark domain (e.g. math, code, reasoning) |
ingest_date |
date | Partition column — date paper was ingested |
papers
| Column | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
paper_id |
varchar | arXiv paper ID |
title |
varchar | Paper title |
abstract |
varchar | Full abstract |
primary_category |
varchar | arXiv primary category (e.g. cs.LG) |
paper_year |
int | Year |
published_at |
timestamp | Submission date |
doi |
varchar | DOI if available |
pdf_url |
varchar | Direct PDF link |
is_ai |
boolean | Core AI category (cs.AI, cs.CV, cs.CL, cs.NE) |
is_ml |
boolean | ML category (cs.LG, stat.ML) |
is_llm |
boolean | LLM-related paper |
is_other_cs |
boolean | CS but outside core AI/ML |
Additional tables: authors, citations, categories, versions, links
Try it in 30 seconds
import duckdb
con = duckdb.connect("arxiv_ai_graph_sample.duckdb")
# Most cited models in AI/NLP papers — pre-built view
con.execute("SELECT * FROM model_citations LIMIT 20").df()
# Or write your own
con.execute("""
SELECT provider, entity, model_type,
COUNT(DISTINCT paper_id) AS papers_citing
FROM entities
WHERE entity_type = 'model'
AND confidence = 1.0
AND paper_year >= 2025
GROUP BY 1, 2, 3
ORDER BY papers_citing DESC
LIMIT 20
""").df()
Sample output — top models, Jan 2024 – Jun 2026
| provider | entity | model_type | papers_citing |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI | GPT | llm | 5,652 |
| OpenAI | GPT-4 | llm | 3,549 |
| OpenAI | GPT-4o | llm | 2,967 |
| Meta | Llama | llm | 1,822 |
| Alibaba | Qwen3 | llm | 1,782 |
| Meta | Llama 3 | llm | 1,727 |
| Alibaba | Qwen2.5 | llm | 1,668 |
| Anthropic | Claude | llm | 1,585 |
| Gemini | llm | 1,476 | |
| Alibaba | Qwen | llm | 1,273 |
| Meta | Llama 2 | llm | 1,141 |
| Meta | Llama 3.1 | llm | 1,039 |
| DeepSeek AI | DeepSeek R1 | llm | 1,007 |
| Stability AI | Stable Diffusion | image_gen | 884 |
| LLaVA Team | LLaVA | vlm | 867 |
| Gemini 2.5 | llm | 747 | |
| Gemma | llm | 731 | |
| Mistral AI | Mistral | llm | 708 |
| OpenAI | o1 | reasoning_llm | 620 |
| DeepSeek AI | DeepSeek | llm | 613 |
DeepSeek R1 adoption curve
The sharpest adoption spike in the dataset — from 3 papers in January 2025 to 48 in February, sustained at 50–90/month ever since:
| Month | Papers citing DeepSeek R1 |
|---|---|
| Jan 2025 | 3 |
| Feb 2025 | 48 |
| Mar 2025 | 49 |
| Apr 2025 | 47 |
| May 2025 | 90 |
| Jun 2025 | 82 |
| Jul 2025 | 52 |
| Aug 2025 | 52 |
| Sep 2025 | 56 |
| Oct 2025 | 84 |
| Nov 2025 | 54 |
| Dec 2025 | 48 |
| Jan 2026 | 53 |
| Feb 2026 | 44 |
| Mar 2026 | 57 |
| Apr 2026 | 80 |
| May 2026 | 67 |
| Jun 2026 | 38 |
More example queries
-- Framework adoption across ML papers
SELECT entity, provider, model_type AS framework_type,
COUNT(DISTINCT paper_id) AS papers
FROM entities
WHERE entity_type = 'framework' AND confidence = 1.0
GROUP BY 1, 2, 3
ORDER BY papers DESC
LIMIT 15;
-- Which benchmarks does GPT-4o get evaluated on?
SELECT e2.entity AS benchmark, COUNT(*) AS papers
FROM entities e1
JOIN entities e2 ON e1.paper_id = e2.paper_id
WHERE e1.entity = 'GPT-4o'
AND e2.entity_type = 'benchmark'
AND e1.confidence = 1.0
AND e2.confidence = 1.0
GROUP BY 1
ORDER BY papers DESC;
-- Provider market share by month (trend analysis)
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('month', ingest_date) AS month,
provider,
COUNT(DISTINCT paper_id) AS papers
FROM entities
WHERE entity_type = 'model' AND confidence = 1.0
GROUP BY 1, 2
ORDER BY 1, papers DESC;
-- LLM research bleeding into non-core CS categories
SELECT p.primary_category, COUNT(DISTINCT p.paper_id) AS papers
FROM papers p
WHERE p.is_llm = true AND p.is_other_cs = true
GROUP BY 1
ORDER BY papers DESC;
-- Model adoption velocity — which models grew fastest in 2025?
SELECT entity, provider, COUNT(1) knt
FROM entities
WHERE entity_type = 'model' AND confidence = 1.0
GROUP BY 1, 2
ORDER BY knt DESC
LIMIT 15;
Confidence scoring
Entity extraction uses a deterministic rule-based pipeline with a curated YAML knowledge base — fully auditable, no LLM black box.
| Score | Meaning |
|---|---|
1.0 |
Unambiguous alias match, or ambiguous alias confirmed by positive context |
0.2 |
Ambiguous alias — matched but context inconclusive |
0.1 |
Likely false positive — negative context matched |
Always filter WHERE confidence = 1.0 for highest-precision results.
Ambiguous tokens (e.g. "Flux" in physics papers, "Ray" in computer vision) are handled with positive/negative context windows — the methodology is documented in the dataset repository.
Coverage
Date range: January 2024 – present (daily updates)
Categories: cs.LG · cs.CL · cs.CV · cs.AI · cs.NE · cs.CR · cs.SE · cs.DC · cs.IR · cs.HC · cs.RO · cs.MA · cs.SD · cs.DB · cs.GT · cs.PL · stat.ML · eess.IV · eess.SP · q-bio.QM
Entity counts (Jan 2024 – Jun 2026):
| Type | Total entities | Unique entities | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| model | ~65,000 | 100+ | GPT-4o, Llama 3.1, Qwen3, DeepSeek R1 |
| framework | ~55,000 | 40+ | PyTorch, DeepSpeed, vLLM, LoRA |
| benchmark | ~15,000 | 50+ | MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, SWE-bench |
| dataset | ~4,000 | 30+ | The Pile, FineWeb, LAION |
Category breakdown (entity rows):
| Category | Entities | Description |
|---|---|---|
| cs.CL | 27,452 | Computation and Language |
| cs.LG | 20,040 | Machine Learning |
| cs.CV | 19,790 | Computer Vision |
| cs.AI | 9,167 | Artificial Intelligence |
| cs.CR | 3,951 | Security and Cryptography |
| cs.SE | 3,763 | Software Engineering |
Pricing and access
| Tier | Coverage | Format | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free sample | 3 × 10-day windows (Jan 2024, Jan 2025, Jun 2026) | DuckDB file (this repo) | Free |
| Snapshot | Jan 2024 – Jun 2026, full | Parquet on S3 | $49 one-time |
| Subscription | Jan 2024 – present + daily updates | Parquet on S3, daily delta | $29/month |
What you get with the full dataset
- All 7 tables in Parquet format, partitioned by
ingest_date aws s3 syncaccess — pipe directly into your existing data stack- 2.5 years of history with daily updates going forward
- Schema-stable with a changelog — no breaking changes without notice
- Daily new partition by 9am UTC
How to purchase
→ Snapshot — $49 one-time
Full dataset, Jan 2024 – Jun 2026. Download once, use forever.
→ Subscription — $29/month
Full dataset + daily updates. Cancel anytime.
After purchase you will receive AWS credentials by email within 24 hours. Download with:
```bash aws configure --profile arxiv-ai-graph aws s3 sync s3://arxiv-ai-graph/snapshot/ ./arxiv-data/ --profile arxiv-ai-graph ```
For enterprise pricing, custom date ranges, or questions: [nowudoit@gmail.com]
License
Metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, categories) derived from arXiv under CC0 1.0 Public Domain. Entity extraction, normalization, confidence scoring, and schema are original work licensed under CC BY 4.0.
Attribution: arXiv AI Entity Graph by arxgraph, CC BY 4.0https://huggingface.co/datasets/arxgraph/arxiv-ai-entity-graph
- Downloads last month
- 39