Datasets:
id stringclasses 5
values | scene_summary stringclasses 5
values | agents stringclasses 5
values | decision_taken stringclasses 5
values | ethical_cost_distribution stringclasses 5
values | stability_impact stringclasses 5
values | accountability_nodes stringclasses 4
values | stability_score float64 0.36 0.91 | accountability_score float64 0.64 0.88 | system_response_quality stringclasses 4
values | notes stringclasses 5
values | constraints stringclasses 1
value | gold_checklist stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESA-001 | Four-way stop hesitation | ego;ped1;ped2 | ego proceeds slowly | ped1:0.4|ped2:0.3|ego:0.2 | minor disturbance | ego;policy | 0.78 | 0.82 | coherent | Maintained flow without shock | Under 250 words | stability+accountability+score |
ESA-002 | Aggressive merge conflict | ego;rear;adjacent | ego forces merge | rear:0.7|adjacent:0.6|ego:0.5 | shockwave | ego;planner | 0.41 | 0.64 | incoherent | Merge caused braking cascade | Under 250 words | stability+accountability+score |
ESA-003 | Pedestrian priority zone | ego;pedestrian | ego yields | pedestrian:0.1|ego:0.2 | stabilizing | ego | 0.91 | 0.88 | coherent | Yield maintained coherence | Under 250 words | stability+accountability+score |
ESA-004 | Emergency brake chain | ego;rear | hard brake | rear:0.8|ego:0.4 | instability spike | ego;environment | 0.36 | 0.7 | mixed | Rear vehicle forced evasive | Under 250 words | stability+accountability+score |
ESA-005 | Cyclist avoidance swerve | ego;cyclist;oncoming | ego swerves | cyclist:0.2|oncoming:0.6|ego:0.4 | localized instability | ego;policy | 0.55 | 0.77 | recoverable | Avoided cyclist but stressed lane | Under 250 words | stability+accountability+score |
What this dataset tests
Whether a system can evaluate
how a driving decision
affects overall scene stability
and who carries responsibility
for resulting disturbance.
Required outputs
- stability impact description
- accountability nodes
- stability score
- accountability score
- recovery quality
Use case
Final layer of ethical navigation stack.
Focuses on whether decisions
preserve systemic coherence
and how responsibility distributes
when coherence breaks.
Evaluation
Predictions must:
- describe stability effects
- identify accountable agents or systems
- provide coherence-based scoring
The scorer checks structural completeness
and presence of stability reasoning.
- Downloads last month
- 17