Hugging Face
Models
Datasets
Spaces
Buckets
new
Docs
Enterprise
Pricing
Website
Tasks
HuggingChat
Collections
Languages
Organizations
Community
Blog
Posts
Daily Papers
Hardware
Learn
Discord
Forum
GitHub
Solutions
Team & Enterprise
Hugging Face PRO
Enterprise Support
Inference Providers
Inference Endpoints
Storage Buckets
Log In
Sign Up
91.6
TFLOPS
Aelin AquaSoul
PRO
SoulInPsyAbstract
Follow
dipankarsarkar's profile picture
1 follower
·
2 following
https://soulinpsyabstract.store ; https://soulinpsyabstract.com
AelinAquaSoul
SoulInPsyAbstract
AI & ML interests
Имею личную экосистему с мулти Гент работами 8 разных млл на разные уровни системы
Recent Activity
reacted
to
their
post
with 🤗
about 5 hours ago
Fine-Tuning the "Don't Fabricate" Rule: 14 Experiments, One Genuine Signal Over five days we ran 14 fine-tuning experiments across six base models to answer a narrow research question: can a simple behavioural rule — "if you don't know, don't guess or fabricate" — be baked into model weights via fine-tuning, rather than living only in the system prompt? The dataset started at 302 examples and grew across iterations to 2,349 examples, all designed explicitly around this rule. We tested six models: gpt-4o-2024-08-06, Mistral-7B, Qwen2.5-7B, Phi-3.5-mini, Llama-3.1-8B, and DeepSeek-R1. The pattern that wouldn't die Across all base models, the dominant response to factual questions was what we call "disclaim-then-fabricate": the output begins with a sentence like "I won't guess", and then — one sentence later — announces a specific invented number as settled fact. We captured this exact pattern six times in a row across different models. The behaviour survives even when fine-tuning examples are explicitly constructed to penalize it. On gpt-4o-2024-08-06 we ran three independent fine-tuning attempts, each with an increasingly larger version of the dataset — including examples deliberately targeted at this exact failure mode. All three runs continued to fabricate when tested. By the third run the dataset had grown ~5× and contained dozens of counterexamples; the model still produced confident fabricated numbers immediately after a disclaimer. Three out of three attempts, no measurable improvement. One exception that deserved a hard look Only on the final run — 2,349 examples, deployed via Azure OpenAI (deployment suffix protocol0-v5) — did a single test sample come back completely clean for the first time in the entire series.
updated
a dataset
about 5 hours ago
SoulInPsyAbstract/sipa-os-governance
published
a dataset
about 5 hours ago
SoulInPsyAbstract/sipa-os-governance
View all activity
Organizations
SoulInPsyAbstract
's models
9
Sort: Recently updated
SoulInPsyAbstract/sipa-os-governance
Updated
about 5 hours ago
SoulInPsyAbstract/sipa-binary-gate
Text Generation
•
Updated
about 6 hours ago
SoulInPsyAbstract/binary-hermes3-lora
Updated
about 6 hours ago
SoulInPsyAbstract/binary-r1-lora
Updated
about 6 hours ago
SoulInPsyAbstract/binary-qwen25-lora
Updated
about 6 hours ago
SoulInPsyAbstract/syntax-ai-community
Updated
about 13 hours ago
SoulInPsyAbstract/SIPA-AI
Updated
about 14 hours ago
SoulInPsyAbstract/specialist-b-refusal-governance
Updated
about 14 hours ago
SoulInPsyAbstract/protocol0-llama-3.1-8b-v5
8B
•
Updated
4 days ago
•
105