90.0% on SWE-bench Verified using Qwen3.6-27B-FP8 โ€” open-weight, consumer GPUs, full transparency

#33
by mrguo - opened

Hi Qwen team and HF community ๐Ÿ‘‹

Wanted to share a result that's been three months in the making.

TL;DR: Qwen3.6-27B-FP8 (your published weights, sglang-served with served-name Qwen3.5-27B-Thinking for legacy compatibility โ€” same checkpoint) reaches 90.0% on SWE-bench Verified โ€” competitive with closed-API SOTA โ€” running on 12ร— consumer RTX 4090s modded to 48GB. No H100 / A100.

Setup

  • Model: Qwen3.6-27B-FP8, Alibaba's official FP8 release, unmodified (no fine-tune, no distillation, no continual training)
  • Inference: sglang, 3 tensor-parallel instances of 4 GPUs each
  • Agent stack: @anthropic-ai/claude-code@2.1.23 in -p one-shot mode, behind a custom protocol-translation proxy (~47K LoC Python)
  • Hardware: 12 ร— RTX 4090 modded 48GB across 2 workstations. Minimum reproducible config: 1 workstation ร— 4 cards.

Results (two-tier honest disclosure)

  • 90.0% headline (450/500) โ€” single-attempt + 13-instance cli/proxy crash retry (6 recovered) + 4 psf__requests instances re-evaluated against real httpbin.org
  • 88.0% strict floor (440/500) โ€” zero retry, zero env fix

Both preds files + official swebench.harness reports + SHA256SUMS are public.

Anti-cheat ablation (the part I think the Qwen team will find most interesting)

Same model + same proxy + Alibaba's own qwen-code CLI instead of claude-cli โ†’ 87.4% headline / 85.4% strict floor. Both significantly clear public SOTA (79.2%).

The ~2.6 pt gap between CLIs is consistent across all tiers โ€” structural (tool-surface design), not dataset-specific exploitation. The engineering uplift is CLI-independent.

Baseline comparison

  • Same Qwen3.6-27B on mini-swe-agent: 67.8%
  • Same model on engineered agent stack: 90.0%

+22.2 pt from agent engineering alone, with the model held constant.

Why posting here

  1. Public thank-you to the Qwen team โ€” the open-weight 27B FP8 release made this entire experiment possible on a budget an independent researcher can actually afford. The model is the foundation; engineering is leverage.
  2. Reviewer invitation โ€” full repo is public (preds, reports, SHA256SUMS, CLI-swap ablation evidence). Issues open for technical scrutiny.
  3. A data point that the open-weight ceiling is higher than public benchmarks suggest โ€” most public agent benchmarks use simple stacks that underestimate the underlying model.

Honest caveat

The protocol-translation proxy is closed-source. Capability disclosure is in proxy_capabilities.md; source review available to SWE-bench official reviewers under Review Terms. The CLI-swap ablation directly addresses the "task-specific exploitation" concern.

Links

Happy to answer technical questions. If anyone at the Qwen team wants to review or has feedback โ€” would be honored.

โ€” mrguo6221 (independent researcher, Jinan, Shandong, China)

Sign up or log in to comment