Do not run the inference from Model card it won't work!!

Use this model space instead!!

https://huggingface.co/spaces/Chrisneverdie/SportsDPT

This model is finetuned with QA pairs so a text completion task would probably result in an error. Questions unrelated to sports may suffer from poor performance. It may still provide incorrect information so just take it as a toy domain model.

FirstSportsELM

The first ever Sports Expert Language Model

Created by Chris Zexin Chen, Sean Xie, and Chengxi Li.

Email for question: zc2404@nyu.edu

GitHub: https://github.com/chrischenhub/FirstSportsELM

As avid sports enthusiasts, we’ve consistently observed a gap in the market for a dedicated large language model tailored to the sports domain. This research stems from our intrigue about the potential of a language model that is exclusively trained and fine-tuned on sports- related data. We aim to assess its performance against generic language models, thus delving into the unique nuances and demands of the sports industry

This model structure is built by Andrej Karpathy: https://github.com/karpathy/nanoGPT

Here is an example QA from SportsDPT 5dc29abdc17ced70ca75e2da6aa5a90

Model Checkpoint File

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1PSYYWdUWiM5t0KTtlpwQ1YXBWRwV1JWi?usp=sharing

put FineTune_ckpt.pt under model folder in finetune/model/ if you wish to proceed with inference

Pretrain Data

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1bZvWxLnmCDYJhgMDaWumr33KbyDKQUki?usp=sharing train.bin ~8.4 Gb/4.5B tokens, val.bin ~4.1 Mb/2M tokens

Pretrain

To replicate our model, you need to use train.bin and val.bin in this drive, which is processed and ready to train. We trained on a 4xA100 40GB node for 30 hrs to get a val loss ~2.36. Once you set up the environment, run the following:

$ torchrun --standalone --nproc_per_node=4 train.py config/train_gpt2.py

You can tweak around with the parameters in train_gpt2.py. We had two experiments and the first one failed badly.

image

The second trial is a success and the parameters are all stored in pretrain/train_gpt2.py

image

Fine Tune

We used thousands of GPT4-generated Sports QA pairs to finetune our model.

  1. Generate Tags, Questions and Respones from GPT-4

python FineTuneDataGeneration.py api_key Numtag NumQuestion NumParaphrase NumAnswer

  • api_key: Your Api Key
  • Numtag: number of tags, default 50, optional
  • NumQuestion: number of questions, default 16, optional
  • NumParaphrase: number of question paraphrases, default 1, optional
  • NumAnswer: number of answers, default 2, optional
  1. Convert Json to TXT and Bin for fine-tuning

python Json2Bin.py

  1. Fine Tune OmniSportsGPT

python train.py FineTuneConfig.py

Ask Your Question!

  1. Inference

python Inference.py YourQuestionHere

python DefaultAnswer.py

python RandomGPT2ChatBot.py

  1. Plot Result

python plot.py

Benchmark

Target: Sports DPT

Default: GPT2 replica finetuned by sports QA

Random: GPT2 size language model finetuned by general QA

Llama2: Llama2 7B finetuned by general QA

image

image

image

Cost

The entire pretrain and finetune process costs around 250 USD. ~200$ in GPU rentals and ~50$ in OpenAI API usage.

Downloads last month
13
Inference Examples
This model does not have enough activity to be deployed to Inference API (serverless) yet. Increase its social visibility and check back later, or deploy to Inference Endpoints (dedicated) instead.