Beyonder-4x7B-v3-random-lora
The idea was very simple. If heuristic methods for determining gate parameters in mergekit-based MoE models can work well, then perhaps we could obtain a better performing model by fine-tuning only the gate parameters.
This model is an attempt at testing that idea. Unfortunately, the performance degraded slightly, but I am sharing it as an experimental result.
Model Details
First, I created an MoE model using mergekit with gate_mode=random and the following four models (same as mlabonne/Beyonder-4x7B-v3):
- mlabonne/AlphaMonarch-7B
- beowolx/CodeNinja-1.0-OpenChat-7B
- SanjiWatsuki/Kunoichi-DPO-v2-7B
- mlabonne/NeuralDaredevil-7
Then, I used LoRA to fine-tune only the gate parameters by specifying "gate" in target_modules. The data used for fine-tuning is as follows. I used the Mistral prompt format.
- 5000 random samples from llm-jp/oasst1-21k-en
- 5000 random samples from databricks/databricks-dolly-15k
- 5000 random samples from hieunguyenminh/roleplay
- 5000 random samples from meta-math/MetaMathQA
- 5000 random samples from m-a-p/CodeFeedback-Filtered-Instruction
The training was conducted on runpod using 4xA6000 GPUs. The main training parameters are as follows:
- lora_r: 128
- lora_alpha: 256
- lora_dropout: 0.05
- lora_target_modules: "gate"
- learning_rate: 3e-4
- num_train_epochs: 5
- batch_size: 64
- max_seq_length: 2048
Evaluation
The evaluation results show a slight degradation in performance. Apart from the possibility that this approach may not be effective, other potential causes could be issues with the dataset, training parameters, training setup (such as prompt formatting), and so on.
Nous (LLM AutoEval)
Model | Average | AGIEval | GPT4All | TruthfulQA | Bigbench |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
mlabonne/AlphaMonarch-7B 📄 | 62.74 | 45.37 | 77.01 | 78.39 | 50.2 |
mlabonne/Beyonder-4x7B-v3 📄 | 61.91 | 45.85 | 76.67 | 74.98 | 50.12 |
Aratako/Beyonder-4x7B-v3-random-lora 📄 | 60.29 | 45.82 | 76.69 | 69.94 | 48.72 |
mlabonne/NeuralDaredevil-7B 📄 | 59.39 | 45.23 | 76.2 | 67.61 | 48.52 |
SanjiWatsuki/Kunoichi-DPO-v2-7B 📄 | 58.29 | 44.79 | 75.05 | 65.68 | 47.65 |
mlabonne/Beyonder-4x7B-v2 📄 | 57.13 | 45.29 | 75.95 | 60.86 | 46.4 |
beowolx/CodeNinja-1.0-OpenChat-7B 📄 | 50.35 | 39.98 | 71.77 | 48.73 | 40.92 |
MT-Bench
1-turn
Model | Coding | Extraction | Humanities | Math | Reasoning | Roleplay | STEM | Writing | avg_score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mlabonne/Beyonder-4x7B-v3 | 6.7 | 8.3 | 9.7 | 6.7 | 6.3 | 9.3 | 9.7 | 10.0 | 8.33750 |
Aratako/Beyonder-4x7B-v3-random-lora | 6.6 | 8.2 | 9.6 | 6.3 | 6.4 | 8.7 | 9.4 | 9.5 | 8.08750 |
mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1 | 5.3 | 8.5 | 9.9 | 6.8 | 6.0 | 9.1 | 9.55 | 8.9 | 8.00625 |
2-turn
Model | Coding | Extraction | Humanities | Math | Reasoning | Roleplay | STEM | Writing | avg_score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mlabonne/Beyonder-4x7B-v3 | 5.4 | 7.6 | 10.0 | 3.5 | 5.5 | 9.0 | 9.6 | 9.1 | 7.46250 |
Aratako/Beyonder-4x7B-v3-random-lora | 5.1 | 8.1 | 9.9 | 4.1 | 3.7 | 8.55 | 9.0 | 7.7 | 7.01875 |
mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1 | 4.1 | 8.4 | 9.8 | 4.7 | 5.6 | 9.0 | 9.2 | 9.5 | 7.53750 |
Open LLM Leaderboard Evaluation Results
Detailed results can be found here
Metric | Value |
---|---|
Avg. | 73.91 |
AI2 Reasoning Challenge (25-Shot) | 71.25 |
HellaSwag (10-Shot) | 87.40 |
MMLU (5-Shot) | 64.78 |
TruthfulQA (0-shot) | 70.49 |
Winogrande (5-shot) | 82.16 |
GSM8k (5-shot) | 67.40 |
- Downloads last month
- 11
Model tree for Aratako/Beyonder-4x7B-v3-random-lora
Evaluation results
- normalized accuracy on AI2 Reasoning Challenge (25-Shot)test set Open LLM Leaderboard71.250
- normalized accuracy on HellaSwag (10-Shot)validation set Open LLM Leaderboard87.400
- accuracy on MMLU (5-Shot)test set Open LLM Leaderboard64.780
- mc2 on TruthfulQA (0-shot)validation set Open LLM Leaderboard70.490
- accuracy on Winogrande (5-shot)validation set Open LLM Leaderboard82.160
- accuracy on GSM8k (5-shot)test set Open LLM Leaderboard67.400