boulderspot
Collection
find places to climb outside from aerial imagery
•
4 items
•
Updated
•
3
This is a model fine-tuned to classify whether an aerial/satellite image contains a climbing area or not.
You can find some images to test inference with in this old repo from the original project
This model is a fine-tuned version of facebook/convnextv2-nano-22k-384 on the pszemraj/boulderspot dataset. It achieves the following results on the evaluation set:
import requests
from PIL import Image
from transformers import pipeline
pipe = pipeline(
"image-classification",
model="pszemraj/convnextv2-nano-22k-384-boulderspot",
)
url = "https://huggingface.co/pszemraj/convnextv2-nano-22k-384-boulderspot/resolve/main/test_img_magic_wood.png?download=true"
image = Image.open(requests.get(url, stream=True).raw)
result = pipe(image)[0]
print(result)
# image.show()
Classification of aerial/satellite imagery, ideally with spacial resolution 10-25 cm (i.e. for 10 cm, each pixel in the image corresonds to approx. 10 cm x 10 cm area on the ground). It may be suitable outside of that, but should be validated as other resolutions were not present in the training data.
The following hyperparameters were used during training:
Training Loss | Epoch | Step | Validation Loss | Accuracy | F1 | Precision | Recall | Matthews Correlation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.1102 | 1.0 | 203 | 0.0431 | 0.9839 | 0.9840 | 0.9841 | 0.9839 | 0.8590 |
0.0559 | 2.0 | 406 | 0.0476 | 0.9839 | 0.9845 | 0.9858 | 0.9839 | 0.8709 |
0.0402 | 3.0 | 609 | 0.0464 | 0.9810 | 0.9817 | 0.9831 | 0.9810 | 0.8468 |
0.0334 | 4.0 | 813 | 0.0348 | 0.9868 | 0.9869 | 0.9870 | 0.9868 | 0.8846 |
0.0445 | 4.99 | 1015 | 0.0340 | 0.9883 | 0.9883 | 0.9883 | 0.9883 | 0.8962 |
Base model
facebook/convnextv2-nano-22k-384