STARE: Surprisal-Guided Token-Level Advantage Reweighting for Policy Entropy Stability
Abstract
GRPO algorithms face policy entropy collapse during training, which STARE addresses through surprisal-guided token-level advantage reweighting and target-entropy regulation to maintain stable reinforcement learning for large language models.
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards algorithms like GRPO have emerged as the dominant post-training paradigm for complex reasoning in LLMs, yet commonly suffer from policy entropy collapse during training. We conduct a first-order gradient analysis of token-level entropy dynamics under GRPO and identify a token-level credit assignment mismatch: the per-token entropy variation decomposes into the product of the trajectory-level advantage and an entropy sensitivity function over the next-token distribution, yielding an advantage-surprisal four-quadrant structure and a near-criticality property. Motivated by it, we propose STARE (Surprisal-guided Token-level Advantage Reweighting for policy Entropy stability), which identifies entropy-critical token subsets via batch-internal surprisal quantiles, selectively reweights their effective advantages, and incorporates a target-entropy closed-loop gate for stable entropy regulation. Across model scales from 1.5B to 32B and three task families (Short CoT, Long CoT, and Multi-Turn Tool Use), STARE sustains stable RL training over thousands of steps while maintaining policy entropy within the target band. On AIME24 and AIME25, STARE outperforms DAPO and other competitive baselines by 4%-8% in average accuracy, with reflection tokens and response length growing in tandem, indicating sustained exploration-exploitation balance that further unlocks RL training potential.Code is available at https://github.com/hp-luo/STARE.
Community
To mitigate policy entropy collapse during RL training, we perform a first-order gradient analysis revealing a token-level credit assignment mismatch in GRPO: the per-token entropy variation decomposes into the product of the trajectory-level advantage and an entropy sensitivity function, yielding an advantage-surprisal four-quadrant structure with a near-criticality property. Building on this insight, we propose STARE, which identifies entropy-critical token subsets through batch-internal surprisal quantiles, selectively reweights their effective advantages, and integrates a target-entropy closed-loop gate for stable entropy regulation. Spanning model scales from 1.5B to 32B across three task families (Short CoT, Long CoT, and Multi-Turn Tool Use), STARE consistently maintains policy entropy within the target band over thousands of training steps, delivering sustained performance gains that surpass competitive RL baselines. Code is available at https://github.com/hp-luo/STARE.
Neat paper. The entropy collapse issue in GRPO has been a massive headache for anyone trying to push long-chain reasoning, so framing it as an advantage-surprisal mismatch is a really intuitive way to look at the instability.
I’m curious how the target-entropy closed-loop gate behaves when you transition between tasks with different complexity levels. Does the gating mechanism need specific tuning for long CoT versus tool use, or is it pretty robust out of the box?
I made a podcast on it with ResearchPod, it makes it easy to get the key concepts on the go:
https://researchpod.app/episode/550ee9b9-74cb-481a-a6b2-7cc7687cb3e9
Thanks — glad the advantage–surprisal framing resonated. That was exactly the intuition we wanted to make explicit: GRPO isn't just "losing entropy" globally, but systematically over-crediting the low-surprisal majority at the expense of the high-surprisal tokens that actually sustain exploration.
The gating mechanism is pretty robust across scenarios. We used the same target entropy threshold Htgt=0.3 for all three task families (Short CoT, Long CoT, and Tool Use) without any task-specific tuning, and it consistently stabilized policy entropy across model scales from 1.5B to 32B.
We also ablated Htgt ∈ {0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4} under the Short CoT setting (Appendix B.8, Table 5). All configurations significantly outperformed the GRPO-ds baseline and maintained stable training within the target entropy band. So there's a fairly forgiving sweet spot rather than a narrow optimum — alternative thresholds like 0.2 also work well in practice.
Thanks for sharing the ResearchPod episode — sounds like a nice way to make the core ideas more accessible!
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2606.19236 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper