Expirements in large-scale small-scale preference learning.
This one was a failure, it benchmarks horribly, despite responding okay to trivia questions in testing
falcon-rw-1b trained with PRO (preference ranking optimization, see https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.17492) on SuperMC and PRM800K (only stage 1) for 3 epochs, using my supertrainer2000 framework.
This is an expiremental model.
Benchmarks coming soon.
Hyperparameters:
- AdamW, weight decay of 0.01, otherwise default hyperparams
- Maximum LR of 1e-5
- Cosine schedule with a warmup of 5400 steps
- Batch size of 4 (2 real x 2 accumulated)
- Maximum of 5 epochs, early stopping (visual observation), stopped after 3
- Gradient clipping norm value of 1.0
- PRO beta of 4
Training prompt format:
### Query
[insert instruction here]
### Answer
[insert response here]
Open LLM Leaderboard Evaluation Results
Detailed results can be found here
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Avg. | 29.12 |
| AI2 Reasoning Challenge (25-Shot) | 25.51 |
| HellaSwag (10-Shot) | 25.87 |
| MMLU (5-Shot) | 24.80 |
| TruthfulQA (0-shot) | 48.28 |
| Winogrande (5-shot) | 49.41 |
| GSM8k (5-shot) | 0.83 |
- Downloads last month
- 10
This model does not have enough activity to be deployed to Inference API (serverless) yet.
Increase its social visibility and check back later, or deploy to Inference Endpoints (dedicated)
instead.
Datasets used to train euclaise/crow-1b-attempt1
Evaluation results
- normalized accuracy on AI2 Reasoning Challenge (25-Shot)test set Open LLM Leaderboard25.510
- normalized accuracy on HellaSwag (10-Shot)validation set Open LLM Leaderboard25.870
- accuracy on MMLU (5-Shot)test set Open LLM Leaderboard24.800
- mc2 on TruthfulQA (0-shot)validation set Open LLM Leaderboard48.280
- accuracy on Winogrande (5-shot)validation set Open LLM Leaderboard49.410
- accuracy on GSM8k (5-shot)test set Open LLM Leaderboard0.830