Document Classification

Section Type: RESULTS

Text: Statistically significant results favoring the CTG were found in recession depth reduction (-2. 9 + 0. 5 mm, test ; -3. 3 + 0. 6 mm, control ; P = 0. 009), root coverage (90. 8 %, test ; 98. 6 %, control ; P = 0. 013), and -3. 9 + / - 0. 7 mm, control, -3. 3 + / - 1. 3 mm, test, recession width reduction (P = 0. 035), whereas mid-buccal probing depth (PD) and PD reduction (PDR) reduction favored the test group (1. 4 + / - 0. 4 mm, test ; 1. 8 + / - 0. 1 mm, control ; P < 0. 001 PD and -0. 0 mm test ; +0. 4 mm control PDR).