Document Classification

Section Type: RESULTS

Text: Outcomes did not differ between the group which received a gait report (n = 39 ; 19 males, 20 females ; mean age 10y 4mo [SD 3y] ; hemiplegia, 3 ; di/triplegia, 28 ; quadriplegia, 8 ; Gross Motor Function Classification System [GMFCS] : level I, 5 ; level II, 12 ; level III 19 ; level IV, 3) and the control group (n = 26 ; 14 males, 12 females ; mean age 9y 5mo [SD 2y 10mo] ; hemiplegia, 1 ; di/triplegia, 21 ; quadriplegia, 4 ; GMFCS : level I, 4 ; level II, 1 ; level III, 9 ; level IV, 2 ; all p values > 0. 29), but improved more in the gait report subgroup in which the FDRO recommendation was followed (seven limbs ; change in anteversion -32. 9, hip rotation -25. 5, foot progression -36. 2) than in the control group (anteversion -12. 2, hip rotation -7. 6, foot progression -12. 4 ; all p values 0. 02) and the gait report subgroup in which FDRO was not performed (32 limbs ; anteversion -1. 0, hip rotation 0. 5, foot progression -8. 0 ; all p values 0. 003).