Document Classification

Section Type: RESULTS

Text: Compared with BMS, all 3 PES stent regions showed : 1) significantly decreased IH (proximal : 0. 97 + / - 1. 06 mm (2) vs. 3. 12 + / - 2. 40 mm (2), overlap : 0. 74 + / - 0. 91 mm (2) vs. 3. 23 + / - 1. 75 mm (2), distal : 0. 88 + / - 0. 85 mm (2) vs. 2. 69 + / - 1. 49 mm (2), all p < 0. 05) ; and 2) increased P&M and EEM areas (Delta P&M, proximal : 0. 96 + / - 1. 36 mm (2) vs. -0. 02 + / - 1. 48 mm (2), overlap : 1. 56 + / - 1. 88 mm (2) vs. 0. 29 + / - 1. 82 mm (2), distal : 1. 03 + / - 1. 81 mm (2) vs. 0. 11 + / - 0. 89 mm (2), all p < 0. 05).