Document Classification

Section Type: RESULTS

Text: Both training methods were efficient since we found an increase after training in the FVC in the G-1 group (from 2. 45 0. 17 to 2. 85 0. 16 ; P = 0. 001) and in the G-2 group (from 2. 35 0. 19 to 2. 55 0. 19 ; P = 0. 007), in the FEV (1) in G-1 (from 2. 18 0. 16 to 2. 46 0. 14 ; P = 0. 01) and in G-2 (from 1. 97 0. 17 to 2. 20 0. 15 ; P < 0. 0001), MIP in G-1 (from 70. 63 4. 03 to 108. 75 7. 41 ; P < 0. 0001) and in G-2 (from 67. 67 5. 02 to 96. 33 8. 30 ; P < 0. 001) and MEP in G-1 (from 73. 13 5. 10 to 82. 50 6. 74 ; P = 0. 007) and in G-2 (from 67. 67 5. 41 to 76. 00 4. 29 ; P = 0. 002).