Document Classification

Section Type: RESULTS

Text: WRT significantly (P < 0. 001) increased both upper (100 15 to 113 18 kg) and lower (102 20 to 116 25 kg) body strength compared with W. WRT significantly decreased waist circumference (94. 8 12. 3 to 92. 9 12. 0 cm, P = 0. 021) and total fat mass (42. 6 11. 1 to 41. 8 10. 8 kg, P = 0. 036) compared with W. WRT also significantly decreased pre - to postintervention body fat (45. 8 % 6. 2 % to 45. 3 % 6. 2 %, P = 0. 018), HbA1c (5. 9 % 1. 2 % to 5. 6 % 1. 0 %, P = 0. 028), and mean glucose calculated from HbA1c (122 39 to 114 32 mgdL (-1), P = 0. 028), whereas W showed no changes.