Document Classification

Section Type: RESULTS

Text: Intervention arm families had a significantly lower bath hot water temperature at 3-month and 12-month follow-up than families in the control arm (3 months : intervention arm median 45. 0 C, control arm median 56. 0 C, difference between medians, -11. 0, 95 % CI -14. 3 to -7. 7) ; 12 months : intervention arm median 46. 0 C, control arm median 55. 0 C, difference between medians -9. 0, 95 % CI -11. 8 to -6. 2) They were significantly more likely to be happy or very happy with their bath hot water temperature (RR 1. 43, 95 % CI 1. 05 to 1. 93), significantly less likely to report the temperature as being too hot (RR 0. 33, 95 % CI 0. 16 to 0. 68) and significantly less likely to report checking the temperature of every bath (RR 0. 84, 95 % CI 0. 73 to 0. 97).