Document Classification

Section Type: RESULTS

Text: The eMPC algorithm gave the best performance as assessed by time to target (8. 8 + / - 2. 2 vs. 10. 9 + / - 1. 0 vs. 12. 3 + / - 1. 9 h ; eMPC vs. Matias vs. Bath, respectively ; P < 0. 05), average blood glucose after reaching the target (5. 2 + / - 0. 1 vs. 6. 2 + / - 0. 1 vs. 5. 8 + / - 0. 1 mmol/l ; P < 0. 01), time in target (62. 8 + / - 4. 4 vs. 48. 4 + / - 3. 28 vs. 55. 5 + / - 3. 2 % ; P < 0. 05), time in hyperglycemia > 8. 3 mmol/l (1. 3 + / - 1. 2 vs. 12. 8 + / - 2. 2 vs. 6. 5 + / - 2. 0 % ; P < 0. 05), and sampling interval (2. 3 + / - 0. 1 vs. 2. 1 + / - 0. 1 vs. 1. 8 + / - 0. 1 h ; P < 0. 05).