Document Classification

Section Type: RESULTS

Text: Concordance between EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-TBNCS was high, with no significant difference in adequacy (88 % vs 88 %, respectively [P. 858] ; concordance rate, 83. 9 % [95 % CI, 77. 9-88. 8]) ; diagnosis (36 % vs 34 %, respectively [P. 289] ; concordance rate, 95. 8 % [95 % CI, 92-92. 8]) ; diagnosis of malignancy (28 % vs 26 %, respectively [P. 125] ; concordance rate, 97. 9 % [95 % CI, 94. 8-99. 4]) ; or sample quality (concordance rate, 83. 3 % [95 % CI, 73. 3-88. 3]).