Document Classification

Section Type: RESULTS

Text: The total effective rate was 91. 3 % (21/23) in Group B, better than that (59. 1 %, 13/22) in Group A. By the end of this study, all scores in Group B, except HAMD, were significantly lower than those in Group A respectively, i. e., for IAD, 33. 20 + / - 4. 53 vs. 44. 00 + / - 5. 81 ; for SAS, 30. 90 + / - 6. 30 vs. 39. 60 + / - 5. 80 ; for SDS, 35. 38 + / - 4. 59 vs. 39. 60 + / - 6. 33 ; for HAMA, 7. 50 + / - 2. 54 vs. 12. 70 + / - 3. 68 ; for SRSHS, 39. 60 + / - 5. 66 vs. 48. 40 + / - 6. 91, showing statistical significances (P < 0. 05).