Patent Number: 
Section: claims

1. A computer-implemented diagnostic method for determining a cause of an event in a product or process according to an energy function model, the method comprising:using at least one processor to perform the steps of:receiving a signal from a first measurement system indicating the event in the product or process;displaying, on a display device, a schematic of a function model of the product or process, the function model comprising a plurality of functions describing actions designed to be performed in the operation of the product or process, the function model further identifying dependencies between the plurality of functions to describe how, why, and when respective actions are performed;converting the function model to an energy function model by performing, using the at least one processor, the steps of:(a) assigning, to each of the plurality of functions, an energy function according to an energy action describing how the particular function of the product or process uses energy during operation;(b) identifying, for a first energy function, a plurality of energy paths within the product or process;(c) displaying, on the schematic, the energy functions and a representation of the plurality of energy paths shown with respect to a displayed how direction, an opposing why direction, and a perpendicular when direction corresponding to the dependencies between the plurality of functions; and(d) associating the first energy function with a second energy function by displaying, on the schematic, a connection between at least one of the plurality of energy paths for the first energy function and the second energy function according to an energy relationship between the first energy function and the second energy function to define the energy function model so as to account for energy within the product or process during operation;selecting, from among the plurality of energy paths, a measurement energy for detecting a contrast between how the product or process is actually using energy and how the product or process is intended to use energy;generating a plurality of measurements of the selected measurement energy using a second measurement system that is different than the first measurement system that indicated the event in the product or process;displaying the plurality of measurements on the display device to identify the contrast; andconducting a progressive search on the contrast to identify a feature or property of the product or process responsible for causing the event. 2. The diagnostic method according to claim 1, wherein the event comprises a malfunction event. 3. The diagnostic method according to claim 1 further comprising the step of limiting the schematic to the narrowest scope known to contain the root cause of the event. 4. The diagnostic method according to claim 1, wherein the first energy function comprises a function for directing energy. 5. The diagnostic method according to claim 1, wherein the first energy function comprises a function for transmitting energy. 6. The diagnostic method according to claim 1, wherein the first energy function comprises a function for converting energy. 7. The diagnostic method according to claim 1, wherein the first energy function comprises a function for containing energy. 8. The diagnostic method according to claim 1, wherein at least one energy path of the plurality of energy paths comprises an input energy path corresponding to energy used to achieve the assigned first energy function. 9. The diagnostic method according to claim 1, wherein at least one energy path of the plurality of energy paths comprises an output energy path corresponding to the performance of useful work. 10. The diagnostic method according to claim 1, wherein at least one energy path of the plurality of energy paths comprises a waste energy path corresponding to energy loss. 11. The diagnostic method according to claim 1, wherein at least one energy path of the plurality of energy paths comprises an input signal energy path. 12. The diagnostic method according to claim 1, wherein at least one energy path of the plurality of energy paths comprises an environmental energy path. 13. The diagnostic method according to claim 1, wherein the plurality of generated measurements comprises direct measurements of the selected energy. 14. The diagnostic method according to claim 1, wherein the plurality of generated measurements comprises indirect measurements of the selected energy through at least one of its component factors. 15. The diagnostic method according to claim 1 further comprising the step of controlling the identified feature or property to prevent a future occurrence of the event. 16. The diagnostic method according to claim 2, wherein the contrast between how the product or process is actually performing and how the product or process is intended to perform is detected by generating a plurality of energy measurements for a second product or process that is not experiencing a malfunction event. 17. The diagnostic method according to claim 2, wherein the product or process comprises a prototype product or process. 18. The diagnostic method according to claim 17, wherein the identified feature or property corresponds to a design under consideration for which a contrast in the direct measurement of the malfunction event is not detected. 19. The diagnostic method according to claim 1, wherein the product or process comprises a production product or process. 20. The diagnostic method according to claim 1 further comprising the step of storing the plurality of generated measurements in a computer data storage device. 21. The diagnostic method according to claim 1, wherein selecting the measurement energy comprises:selecting a first energy;generating one or more first measurements of the selected first energy in the product or process;based on the one or more first measurements, determining that the contrast is not detected by measuring the first energy;in response to determining that the contrast is not detected by measuring the first energy, selecting a second energy;generating one or more second measurements of the selected second energy in the product or process;based on the one or more second measurements, determining that the contrast is detected by measuring the second energy; andassigning the second energy as the measurement energy. 22. A computer-implemented method for diagnosing and applying corrective action to a malfunctioning product or process according to an energy function model, the method comprising:using one or more processors to perform the steps of:receiving a signal from a first measurement system indicating the event in the product or process;selecting from among a plurality of energy paths existing during operation of the product or process, a first energy for measurement to detect a contrast between how the product or process is actually using energy and how the product or process is intended to use energy, wherein the energy function model defines the plurality of energy paths associated with respective energy functions of the product or process, wherein the respective energy functions describe how the product or process is intended to use energy during operation, and wherein the one or more processors displays on a display device a representation of at least one of the plurality of energy paths connecting two or more of the respective energy functions along a displayed how direction, an opposing why direction, and a perpendicular when direction corresponding to dependencies between the two or more respective functions so as to account for energy within the product or process during operation;conducting a progressive search on the contrast to identify a feature or property of the product or process that can be used to control an energy function that is malfunctioning; andcontrolling the identified feature or property to prevent future malfunctions. 23. The method according to claim 22, wherein the contrast between how the product or process is actually performing and how the product or process is intended to perform is detected by generating a plurality of energy measurements for a second product or process that is not experiencing a malfunction event. 24. The method according to claim 22, wherein the product or process comprises a prototype product or process. 25. The method according to claim 24, wherein the identified feature or property corresponds to a design under consideration for which a contrast in the direct measurement of the malfunction event is not detected. 26. The method according to claim 22, wherein the product or process comprises a production product or process. 27. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having stored thereon computer-executable program instructions for diagnosing a cause of an event in a product or process according to an energy function model, the computer-executable program instructions, when executed by a computer processor, causing the computer processor to perform the steps of:receiving a signal from a first measurement system indicating the event in the product or process;displaying, on a display device, a schematic of a function model of the product or process, the function model comprising a plurality of functions describing actions designed to be performed in the operation of the product or process, the function model further identifying dependencies between the plurality of functions to describe how, why, and when respective actions are performed;converting the function model to an energy function model by performing, using the computer processor, the steps of:(a) assigning, to each of the plurality of functions, an energy function according to an energy action describing how the particular function of the product or process uses energy during operation;(b) identifying, for a first energy function, a plurality of energy paths within the product or process;(c) displaying, on the schematic, the energy functions and a representation of the plurality of energy paths shown with respect to a displayed how direction, an opposing why direction, and a perpendicular when direction corresponding to the dependencies between the plurality of functions; and(d) associating the first energy function with a second energy function by displaying, on the schematic, a connection between at least one of the plurality of energy paths for the first energy function and the second energy function according to an energy relationship between the first energy function and the second energy function to define the energy function model so as to account for energy within the product or process during operation;selecting, from among the plurality of energy paths, a measurement energy for detecting a contrast between how the product or process is actually using energy and how the product or process is intended to use energy;generating a plurality of measurements of the selected measurement energy using a second measurement system that is different than the first measurement system that indicated the event in the product or process; andconducting a progressive search on the contrast to identify a feature or property of the product or process responsible for causing the event.