Patent Number: 044850670
Section: description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION The problem to be solved by this invention will be restated with reference to FIG. 1. Fuel pit fuel chute 1 rises from a fuel pit (not shown) at an angle .theta..sub.1 from vertical. Reactor vessel fuel chute 2 rises from a reactor vessel (not shown) at an angle .theta..sub.2 from vertical. In a current design of an LMFBR, .theta..sub.1 and .theta..sub.2 are equal and are approximately 20 degrees. It will be shown later that the sophistication and great advantage of this invention are especially striking when .theta..sub.1 and .theta..sub.2 have different values. Fuel assemblies, (not shown) of approximately 1200 lbs. weight, are to be transferred between chutes 1 and 2. Part of the problem is that the chutes are not vertical. A hoist and trolley arrangement can accomplish the transfer with difficulty by coordinating movement of the trolley along the x axis (see coordinate axes 10) with hoist movement along axis y to achieve movement parallel to .theta..sub.1 and .theta..sub.2 and the transfer between chutes 1 and 2. The coordination would require visual human control or complex computer control, both being undesirable. The current invention is a shifting beam carriage having a plurality of beams 4 supporting a hoist box 6. The beams 4 are attached to hoist box 6 and to a base plate or series of base plates 11 by rotatably free pins 7. Hoist box 6 contains hoisting means (not shown) and may support a hoist tube 5. Shifting of the carriage generally back and forth along the x axis as permitted by pin 7 attachments is planned by certain design parameters to bring hoist tube 5 into alignment with respectively .theta..sub.1 and .theta..sub.2 and also to bring the end of hoist tube 5 into close proximity respectively to chutes 1 and 2. FIG. 1 defines symbols for angles and lengths used to design the shifting beam carriage. "CG" is the center of gravity of the carriage with a loaded fuel assembly. Given that hoist tube 5 is inclined from the vertical by an angle .beta. when the CG is midway between chutes 1 and 2, define: ##EQU1## and note: ##EQU2## One can choose d and l such that: EQU .delta..apprxeq..theta..sub.0 and note that: ##EQU3## One can now iteratively solve for .alpha. and "a" such that: ##EQU4## Using the equation for x and y, the position of the CG, viz: ##EQU5## The above calculational process provides parametric values used to design the walking beam carriage. Refer to FIG. 2 which shows the shifting beam carriage in three positions. Position 13 shows hoist tube 5 in juxtaposition to fuel pit fuel chute 1, position 15 shows hoist tube 5 in juxtaposition to reactor vessel fuel chute 2, and position 14 is midway between the two. In positions 13 and 15, hoist tube 5 can receive or dispense a fuel assembly into or out of the chute. In both positions hoist tube 5 is aligned with the chute at angle .theta..sub.1 or .theta..sub.2 so that the transfer of the fuel assembly therebetween is smoothly accomplished by a simple hoisting act. Note that the center of mass 12 of the carriage (with a fuel assembly within hoist tube 5) moves along an approximately horizontal straight line (see FIG. 2). The movement of the carriage between positions 13 and 15 therefore does not occasion addition or loss of potential energy and can be impelled by forces merely sufficient to overcome frictional resistance, principally in pins 7. A pendulum mounted hoist would not share this advantage. While the carriage must be sufficiently strong to support the fuel assembly, certain components which transmit only transfer forces may be of decreased bulk and/or increased reliability due to exposure to smaller stress. DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT FIGS. 3, 4 illustrate a preferred embodiment in which four beams 4 support a hoist box 6 via six pins P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6. In the plan view of FIG. 3, and in the profile view of FIG. 4, means for control of the carriage are shown. A transfer drive shaft 16 penetrates wall 3 and drives transfer chain 17. Transfer chain 17 traverses the chamber and forms an endless circle around pulley 18. At point 19, chain 17 is fixed to hoist tube 5. When chain 17 is rotated clockwise by shaft 16, hoist tube 5 is moved in the direction of fuel pit fuel chute 1. The entire carriage pivots at P1, P2, P3, P4, P5 and P6 and hoist tube 5 moves into the configuration labeled 15 in FIG. 2. When chain 17 is rotated counterclockwise, the carriage pivots into the configuration labeled 13 in FIG. 2. Because point 19 is below the center of mass 12, a mechanical advantage exists which reduces the required transfer force. Chain 17, shaft 16, and associated components need exert forces and withstand stresses merely adequate to overcome frictional forces during transfer and need not be sufficiently strong to bear the fuel assembly weight. FIG. 3 also shows a winch drive shaft 20 with a winch chain 21 for control of a hoist located in hoist box 6. The rotary shafts 16 and 20 can be easily sealed at the sites of penetration through wall 3 to prevent escape of inerting gas or radiation. Outside the transfer chamber, these shafts will connect to drive motors which are then available for maintenance. The shafts can be externally calibrated and labeled to allow remote, and perhaps blind, operation. The motion of the transfer chain 17 for the transfer from one chute to the other is a simple linear motion of one degree of freedom. The complicated motion of the hoist tube 5, is an inherent feature of the carriage, even if the chutes are inclined at different angles .theta..sub.1 and .theta..sub.2. The carriage will transfer between chutes by means of a simple rotation of drive shaft 16 and the operation need not coordinate motions in two directions. The carriage is a squat, small and simple structure which can be easily constructed to be sufficiently reliable to provide many years of maintenance free operation in a hostile environment.