Patent Number: 052176754
Section: description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION In the process of the invention, the termination point of the bubbling is decided by utilizing the increase of radiation due to the introduction of .sup.11 CO.sub.2 into the reaction vessel by bubbling, and the termination point of the distillation of .sup.11 CH.sub.3 I is decided by utilizing the decrease of radiation due to the discharge of .sup.11 CH.sub.3 I from the reaction vessel by the distillation. That is, when the radiation becomes a maximum, it is judged that the bubbling is terminated. When the radiation becomes a minimum, it is judged that the distillation of .sup.11 CH.sub.3 I is terminated. The termination point of the evaporation of the reducing agent solution is decided by detecting the temperature in an exhaust tube for discharging the vapor of the reducing agent solution connected with the reaction vessel. In this process, the temperature variation due to the evaporation of the reducing agent solution is utilized, i.e., the temperature rises together with the start of the evaporation and drops by the termination of the evaporation. When the temperature in the exhaust tube becomes a minimum, it is judged that the evaporation of the reducing agent solution is terminated. The temperature variation accompanied by the evaporation of the reducing agent solution is preferably detected by measuring the temperature in the reaction vessel. However, since the corrosive action of hydroiodic acid placed in the reaction vessel is very strong, it is difficult to place a temperature sensor in the reaction vessel. Therefore, the temperature sensor is attached to the exhaust tube, and the temperature in the exhaust tube is detected. The termination point of the supply of .sup.11 CO.sub.2 gas into the reaction vessel is decided by detecting the radiation on the introducing side of .sup.11 CO.sub.2 gas. In this process, the fact is utilized that the radiation is great during supplying .sup.11 CO.sub.2 gas, but it is small when the supply is terminated. When the radiation is sharply decreased, it is judged that the supply of .sup.11 CO.sub.2 gas is terminated. The detecting point of the radiation may be any point between the target box and the reaction vessel. The above maximum point and the minimum point of the radiation emitted from the reaction vessel, the minimum point of the temperature in the exhaust tube, and the sharp decrease of the radiation on the introducing side of .sup.11 CO.sub.2 gas can be decided by visual observation of various displays indicating the output of the radiation sensor. Alternatively, the output of the radiation sensor is automatically decided by inputting it into a controller such as a microcomputer, and the next work is automatically started. Unless otherwise indicated, the discussion regarding FIG. 1 with respect to elements 1 to 19 and 21 to 23 also applies to FIG. 8. However, also shown in FIG. 8 is the provision of a branch tube 25 connected with the exhaust tube 15, and a temperature detecting element 26 is inserted into the exhaust tube 15. The temperature detecting element 26 is connected with a microprocessor 28 through an A/D converter 27. Also shown in FIG. 8 is radiation sensor 21 provided near the detecting coil 30 of the transfer tube 7 connecting the target box 4 with the collecting coil 8. EXAMPLES Example 1 An apparatus for the synthesis of .sup.11 C-labeled methyl iodide is shown in FIG. 1. The apparatus is composed of a target gas cylinder 1 which stores a mixed gas for the target, and the target gas cylinder 1 is connected with a target box 4 in which .sup.11 CO.sub.2 gas is produced by a transfer tube 3 through an electromagnetic valve 2. The target box 4 is connected with a collecting coil 8 by a transfer tube 7 through electromagnetic valves 5,6. A helium gas cylinder 9 is also connected with the collecting coil 8 by transfer tubes 11,7 through electromagnetic valves 10,6. The collecting coil 8 is put in a cooling vessel 12, and the outlet of the collecting coil 8 is connected with a reaction vessel 14 by a transfer tube 13. The reaction vessel 14 is further connected with a syringe 16 containing hydroiodic acid by a transfer tube 18 through an electromagnetic valve 17 as well as an exhaust tube 15. A radiation sensor 21 is disposed adjacent to the reaction vessel, and the radiation sensor 21 is connected with a personal computer 23 through an A/D converter 22. .sup.11 C-labeled methyl iodide was produced using the above apparatus. As the mixed gas for the target, highly pure N.sub.2 gas (99.999%) or a mixed gas of 90% of N.sub.2 gas and 10% of O.sub.2 gas was used, and filled into the target box 4 from the target gas cylinder 1 by opening the valve 2 at a pressure of 5-30 kg/cm.sup.2. Then, proton beam 19 supplied from a cyclotron (not shown) was irradiated for 10-60 minutes to produce .sup.11 CO.sub.2 gas through a nuclear reaction (.sup.14 N(p.multidot.d).sup.11 C). Subsequently, the target gas containing .sup.11 CO.sub.2 was delivered to the collecting coil 8 cooled at -186.degree. C. by the cooling vessel 12 through the valves 5,6, and .sup.11 CO.sub.2 gas was collected. After the collection was finished, the collecting coil 8 was heated to deliver .sup.11 CO.sub.2 gas to the reaction vessel 14 by supplying helium gas from the gas cylinder 9 through the valves 10,6. In the reaction vessel, .sup.11 CO.sub.2 was reduced by bubbling it into 50-30 .mu.l of (a saturated solution of LiAlH.sub.4 and THF) solution as the reducing agent solution. The radiation emitted from the reaction vessel 14 was measured by the radiation sensor 21, and the electric signal outputted therefrom was converted to a digital signal by the A/D converter 22. The digital signal was inputted in the microcomputer 23. The microcomputer 23 treated the digital signal data to indicate the strength of the radiation on a display as a voltage value, and decided the termination point of the bubbling. The output voltage curve x was as shown in FIG. 2. When the bubbling was started, the output voltage rose from the starting point a of the bubbling. The output voltage rise was stopped at the termination point b of the bubbling. The termination point b was decided by the microcomputer 23, and the computer 23 instructed to start heating of the reaction vessel 14. The reducing agent solution was evaporated by the heating, and discharged through the exhaust tube 15. Thus, a complex of .sup.11 CO.sub.2 and LiAlH.sub.4 remained in the reaction vessel 14 as the intermediate. 1 ml of 55-58% hydroiodic acid solution was introduced into the reaction vessel 14 by operating the syringe 16 to synthesize methyl iodide labeled with .sup.11 C. The output voltage was almost constant from the termination of the bubbling to the .sup.11 CH.sub.3 I synthesis. Then, the reaction vessel 14 was heated again, and .sup.11 CH.sub.3 I was recovered by distillation. The output voltage dropped from the starting point c of the distillation, and the output voltage drop was stopped at the termination point d of the distillation. The microcomputer 23 decided the termination point of the distillation, and instructed to stop the recovery. The synthesis time of .sup.11 CH.sub.3 I was 7-8 minutes. The utilization of .sup.11 CO.sub.2 gas was 98%, and the recovery of .sup.11 CH.sub.3 I was 70% , whereas in the conventional process conducted using the above apparatus except the radiation sensor 21, the synthesis time was 15-20 minutes. The utilization of .sup.11 CO.sub.2 gas was 88%, and the recovery of .sup.11 CH.sub.3 I was 50%. Example 2 An apparatus for the synthesis of .sup.11 C-labeled methyl iodide is shown in FIG. 3. This apparatus is the same as employed in Example 1 except that the radiation sensor 21 is not provided but a temperature sensor 24 is provided. In detail, a branch tube 25 is connected with the exhaust tube 15, and a temperature detecting element 26 is inserted into the exhaust tube 15. The temperature detecting element 26 is connected with a microcomputer 28 through an A/D converter 27. .sup.11 C-labeled methyl iodide was produced using the above apparatus sumilar to Example 1. The bubbling time was set at the same 4-5 minutes as the conventional process, and the distillation time was set at the same 4-5 minutes as the conventional process. The temperature in the exhaust tube 15 was measured by the temperature sensor 24, and the electric signal outputted therefrom was converted to a digital signal by the A/D converter 27. The digital signal was inputted in the microcomputer 28. The microcomputer 28 treated the digital signal data to indicate the temperature on a display as a voltage value, and decided the termination point of the evaporation of the reducing agent solution. The output voltage curve y was shown in FIG. 4. After the termination of the bubbling, when the evaporation of the reducing agent solution was started, the output voltage gradually rose from the starting point 4 of the evaporation. Then, the output voltage gradually dropped, and it was a minimum at the termination point f of the evaporation. The termination point f was decided by the microcomputer 28, and the computer 28 instructed to work the syringe 16. The hydroiodic acid was injected into the reaction vessel 14, and .sup.11 CH.sub.3 I was synthesized. The synthesis time of .sup.11 CH.sub.3 I was 7-8 minutes. The utilization of .sup.11 CO.sub.2 gas was 98%, and the recovery of .sup.11 CH.sub.3 I was 70%, whereas in the conventional process conducted using the above apparatus except the radiation sensor 21, the synthesis time was 15-20 minutes. The utilization of .sup.11 CO.sub.2 gas was 98%, and the recovery of .sup.11 CH.sub.3 I was 50%. EXAMPLE 3 An apparatus for the synthesis of .sup.11 C-labeled methyl iodide is shown in FIG. 5. This apparatus is the same as Example 1 except that the radiation sensor 21 is provided near the detecting coil 30 of the transfer tube 7 connecting the target box 4 with the collecting coil 8 instead of the reaction vessel 14. .sup.11 C-labeled methyl iodide was produced using the above apparatus similar to Example 1. The bubbling time was set at the same 4-5 minutes as the conventional process, and the distillation time was set at the same 4-5 minutes as the conventional process. The evaporation time of the reducing agent solution was set at the same 2-3 minutes as the conventional process. The output voltage curve z was shown in FIG. 6. When the supply of .sup.11 CO.sub.2 gas was started, the output voltage rose from the starting point g of the supply. While the supply of .sup.11 CO.sub.2 gas was almost constant, the output voltage curve z was almost constant. When the supply of .sup.11 CO.sub.2 gas was terminated, the output voltage dropped. The computer 23 decided the termination point of the supply, and instructed to start the collection of .sup.11 CO.sub.2 gas by the collecting coil 8. The synthesis time of .sup.11 CH.sub.3 I was 7-8 minutes. The utilization of .sup.11 CO.sub.2 gas was 98%, and the recovery of .sup.11 CH.sub.3 I was 70%, whereas in the conventional process conducted using the above apparatus except the radiation sensor 21, the synthesis time was 15-20 minutes. The utilization of .sup.11 CO.sub.2 gas was 98%, and the recovery of .sup.11 CH.sub.3 I was 50%.