Patent Number: 
Section: description

The invention will now be described in detail by means of preferred embodiments. In agreement with the known MIMAS method as cited above, the method according to the invention implies the separate preparation of a Pu-U oxide powder on the one hand and an uranium oxide powder free of plutonium on the other hand. According to a first embodiment the Pu-U oxide powder is prepared conventionally by mechanically milling PuO2 and UO2 materials, whereas the UO2 powder is prepared as follows: To an aqueous solution of uranyl nitrate small amounts, i.e. between 0.5 and 2 wt %, of organic thickeners are added, such as METHOCEL (a water soluble cellulose polymer), dextran, polyvinyl alcohol, such that the viscosity of the solution is adjusted to values between 20 and 100 centipoise. There-after, this solution is dispersed into droplets, which are introduced into an ammonia bath. In this bath, due to the network formed by the long chain organic polymers, precipitation occurs within the original droplets, so that nearly spherical beads are formed. The size of these beads depends on the size of the droplets produced during dispersion. In a preferred embodiment these beads present diameters of between 20 and 50 xcexcm. These beads are then washed to remove nitrate salts (ammonium nitrate salts in the above example) and organic polymers, and are subjected to an azeotropic distillation using an immiscible organic solvent such as C2Cl4 to remove water. Once dried the beads are in a hydroxide form, from which they are converted to oxide by a thermal treatment of between 2 and 6 hours duration and at about 400xc2x0 C. in air. Thereby residual organic polymers are pyrolysed. The beads are then again submitted to a thermal treatment of between 4 and 8 hours duration, this time at about 800xc2x0 C. and in a reducing atmosphere of Ar/5%H2, to convert U3O8 to UO2. The beads can be produced by conventional uranium processing facilities (no a contamination). They are free flowing, dust free and do not require any further mechanical treatment such as milling prior to mixing with the powder containing plutonium. The homogeneity of the finally produced fuel can further be enhanced by sieving the beads and retaining only beads with diameters in the range of 20 to 50 xcexcm. Alternatively this result can also be achieved by using a droplet dispersion device which produces droplets of well defined size such that the bead diameters remain within said range and no sieving becomes necessary. Once mixed the MOX powder is compacted into pellets by using a press which applies a pressure of between 200 and 600 MPa. These pellets are then sintered at high temperature, preferably at 1700xc2x0 C., in a humidified Ar/H2 atmosphere, the hydrogen content of which lies between 1 and 6% and the water vapour introduction should result in a ratio of the partial H2 pressure to the water vapour partial pressure of between 20 and 60. The water allows to control the oxygen potential of the gas atmosphere which results in an enhanced diffusion and in a more homogeneous fuel thus enabling a longer burn-up in the reactor. According to a variant of the method the powder containing an excess content of plutonium can be prepared in the same way as above described for the uranium oxide powder, but by starting with uranyl-plutonium nitrate instead of uranyl nitrate. The inventive method can be realised in conventional MOX fabrication facilities and conserves all the advantages of the MIMAS process but does not suffer from the drawbacks of this process as mentioned above.