Patent Number: 
Section: claims

1. A method of validating a nuclear reactor instrumentation output signal for a plurality of in-reactor detectors having a plurality of detector elements radially spaced at approximately the same axial elevation relative to a nuclear reactor core with each of the detector elements having an output signal indicative of a measured reactor operating parameter at a radial and axial location at which the detector element is located, comprising the steps of:running a predictive calculation of an anticipated output of three or more of the detector elements at substantially the same axial elevation based on a current operating state of the reactor;taking a ratio of an actual signal respectively generated by the three or more detector elements at approximately the same axial elevation, to the corresponding anticipated output;generating an expected range of the ratios of the actual signals generated to the corresponding anticipated outputs for a number of adverse plant operating conditions;determining if the ratio of the actual signal generated by any of the three or more of the detector elements at substantially the same axial elevation is outside the range of ratios;spline fitting the ratios of the detector elements at substantially the same axial elevation that are within the range of ratios;identifying whether any detector element who has a ratio outside the ange has a ratio that is similar to the spline fit ratio at the corresponding radial location; andremoving any detector element that has a ratio outside the range that is not similar to the spline fit ratio from reactor core calculation considerations. 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of generating an expected range of the ratios is determined by an offline Monte Carlo analysis. 3. The method of Claim l wherein the number of adverse operating conditions include one or more dropped rods. 4. The method of claim 3 wherein the number of adverse operating conditions take into consideration random detector depletion and sensor signal noise. 5. The method of Claim l including the step of normalizing the range of ratios to take into account the difference in total measured signal and total predicted signal. 6. The method of claim 1 wherein before a suspect detector is removed from reactor core calculation considerations there must be a user-specified number of validated detectors within a given area of the suspect detector. 7. The method of claim 6 wherein the user-specified number of detectors must be detectors whose signals have been validated. 8. The method of claim 6 wherein before a suspect detector is removed from reactor core calculation considerations there must be a predetermined fraction of the plurality of detector elements at approximately the same axial elevation whose signals have been validated or is otherwise known to be working. 9. The method of claim 1 wherein the number of adverse operating conditions include one or more of misaligned rods, misaligned control banks, and power level mismatches.