Datasets:
Tasks:
Text Classification
Modalities:
Text
Formats:
csv
Languages:
English
Size:
10K - 100K
License:
text
stringlengths 1
1.64k
| label
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|
But really, this film doesn't have much of a plot. | 0 |
"I Am Curious: Yellow" is a risible and pretentious steaming pile. | 0 |
The viewer comes away with no new perspectives (unless one comes up with one while one's mind wanders, as it will invariably do during this pointless film). | 0 |
it's unattractive. | 0 |
MILLIONS of people flocked to this stinker, thinking they were going to see a sex film... | 0 |
I would put this at the top of my list of films in the category of unwatchable trash! | 0 |
The filmmakers tried hard, but the movie seems awfully sloppy to me. | 0 |
Overall, extremely horrible casting and the story is badly told. | 0 |
All in all, though, the movie is harmless, only a waste of rental. | 0 |
And leaves the audience bored and confused, and jealous, for that matter. | 0 |
They were not given any characters or good lines to work with. | 0 |
I was prepared for the possibility that this would be awful, but the script (or lack thereof) makes for a film that's also pointless. | 0 |
This clunker I could barely sit through once. | 0 |
So, in the end, the movie is hollow, and shallow, and message-less. | 0 |
The characters are badly developed, and I spent lots of minutes to understand their roles in the story. | 0 |
John Ritter doing pratt falls, 75% of the actors delivering their lines as if they were reading them from cue cards, poor editing, horrible sound mixing (dialogue is tough to pick up in places over the background noise), and a plot that really goes nowhere. | 0 |
Plus it just wasn't that interesting. | 0 |
John Ritter is horrible, there is simply nothing to recommend this film except to see Dorothy Stratten, who was truly pretty. | 0 |
I hope the makers of this crap have day jobs because this film sucked! | 0 |
Filmed on a budget of what looks to be about 20 bucks, TZC is a completely horrible horror movie that relies on lame, forgetable actors whom couldn't act to save their lives and gore that's more gross than frightening. | 0 |
That's not a great idea. | 0 |
We're actually bored throughout most of this 3-part chronicle because of the lame(twilight-zone like) easily understood and slow-pacingly revealed finale's. | 0 |
This thing is a big ball of nothing. | 0 |
And that's not the only way in which this low budget gore flick fails to deliver: the acting is lousy (with Joe Haggerty, as the tale-telling Ebenezer Jackson, giving one of the strangest performances I have ever seen); the locations are uninspired; the script is dreary; there's a sex scene with zero nudity; and the ending.... | 0 |
You'd do well to avoid this turkey, even at a bargain basement price. | 0 |
My girlfriend left it here, so now I live with the shame of owning this piece of crap. | 0 |
The scenery is bland and boring (same as Mr. Sykes other ventures), and the music is a cross between cheap motel porn and really bad guitar driven metal (see the scenery comment). | 0 |
story line was pretty awful and during the first part of the first short story i wondered what the hell i was watching but at the same time it was so awful i loved it cheap laughs all the way. | 0 |
Other than that, its a very clumsy anthology film with the technical competence of a Lego house built by a whelk. | 0 |
I almost didn't finish watching this bad movie,but it will be unfair of me to write a review without watching the complete movie. | 0 |
I have not seen many low budget films i must admit, but this is the worst movie ever probably, the main character the old man talked like, he had a lobotomy and lost the power to speak more than one word every 5 seconds, a 5 year old could act better. | 0 |
I couldn't pay long enough attention to it since the acting was just horrible. | 0 |
Even the half-hearted praise than surrounds his Camp Blood films is given grudgingly and I'm as guilty of this as anyone. | 0 |
Worse still, the two stories which make up the bulk of the running time are utterly routine, made worse by indifferent performances and lackluster direction by Brad Sykes, previously responsible for the likes of CAMP BLOOD (1999). | 0 |
In fact I must confess, so bad was it I fast forwarded through most of the garbage. | 0 |
Really, I can't believe that I spent $5 on this movie. | 0 |
To this day it is the worst movie I have ever seen, and I have seen some pretty bad ones. | 0 |
The whole movie was sad and depressing, there were way to many goofs, and the editing was very poor - to many scenes out of context. | 0 |
The actors are not convincing - they lack emotions. | 0 |
This story was all over the place and didn't seem to have a center. | 0 |
I was highly disappointed in this movie. | 0 |
The plot is predictable, the acting mediocre (I'm being kind), and the editing atrocious. | 0 |
You would still have bad lines, really bad acting, particularly by Shepherd, cheesy effects, and poor direction. | 0 |
What script did they read when agreeing to be in this movie as it is most assuredly boring and only a means to show off a light saber on a very small scale. | 0 |
This made no sense to me. | 0 |
The acting was atrocious, the plot completely implausible. | 0 |
This was a waste of two hours of my life. | 0 |
I found it to be absolutely idiotic. | 0 |
It is obvious this episode is a victim of style over content. | 0 |
Additionally, the story just seemed to drag on for no apparent reason... | 0 |
Unfortunately, despite an outstanding performance by Heath Ledger in the lead role, the plot was paper thin.... | 0 |
The actors are passable, but they didn't have much to work with given the very plodding and unimpressive script. | 0 |
The story plods along at an alarming rate (alarming because never has a film plodded so slowly! | 0 |
So it's silly me for fancifully imagining this movie was a serious attempt to tell the Kelly story. | 0 |
This was trite, cliche-ridden and boring. | 0 |
And the film is riddled with one hackneyed scene like this after another. | 0 |
There was no narrative flow that made any sort of sense. | 0 |
Despite the excellent line up of actors the movie was very disappointing. | 0 |
And I felt like every scene was routinely predictable and signposted, like a very bad tv soap. | 0 |
it is the worst film I have seen in a long time | 0 |
From the very beginning, the political theme of this film is so obvious and heavy handed, that the outcome is entirely predictable. | 0 |
That's really all I can say about the story, as I wasn't paying the fullest attention to be honest. | 0 |
It's not funny enough to be a comedy, it's too fake-sad to really touch, so in my eyes it's just not good. | 0 |
This movie was awful. | 0 |
This was the worst film I have seen in a long time. | 0 |
It seems like the film, at times, wants to appeal to the lowest common denominator in the audience PLUS they can't even do this well--with some of the worst acting I've seen in a very long time. | 0 |
Director Herbert Ross only did solid work when he wasn't coupled with one of Neil Simon's screenplays; here, Ross sets up gags like a thudding amateur, hammering away at belligerent routines which fail to pay off (such as semi-incoherent Matthau showing up at a mechanic's garage to audition for a TV commercial). | 0 |
Some scenes such as a party scene in a bar just goes on for too long and really has no purpose. | 0 |
The story goes downhill halfway through the movie and Goldie's charm just doesn't save this movie. | 0 |
Whatever humour exists is tired and strained, relying on offensive stereotypes about Arab men who, apparently, all lust after Western women, particularly if they are blonde and blue-eyed. | 0 |
Likely ? | 0 |
Outlandish premise that rates low on plausibility and unfortunately also struggles feebly to raise laughs or interest. | 0 |
The script is insulting to anyone (including a high school student's) intelligence. | 0 |
The only good thing about this movie was the shot of Goldie Hawn standing in her little french cut bikini panties and struggling to keep a dozen other depraved women from removing her skimpy little cotton top while she giggled and cooed. | 0 |
Their motivations, personalities, and dialogue are often simply incoherent. | 0 |
Too much blood, too much time, too much themes for nothing. | 0 |
this film was a major letdown. | 0 |
But (again) predictable and not even remotely scary. | 0 |
The cast is wasted, the writing is stupid and pretentious. | 0 |
However although it says on the DVD box it is a Matthew Mconaughey film and uses this as a marketing ploy, he has a few lines and is on screen for not very minutes at the end of the film, he is basically an extra and he doesn't exactly light up the screen while he is on, so die hard fans, really not worth it from that point of view. | 0 |
That makes it sound pretty awful, and it is... | 0 |
I finally found it on DVD at the end of last year it is a very low budget movie The story is set around amazon jungle tribes that are living in fear of the devil. | 0 |
It's just atrociously padded trash that only a Video Nasty fan will probably view and even then, if you are making your way through the list, leave this for the very last. | 0 |
To make matters worse, this film has ultra-minimal gore, no real scares and a lot of unnecessary penis. | 0 |
I am not sure what the purpose of that was. | 0 |
Franco directs in his usual torpid style and loads this laughable effort with his usual dreadful trademarks: crap gore, murky cinematography, rapid zooms, numerous crotch shots, out of focus imagery, awful sound effects, and ham-fisted editing. | 0 |
But, of course, then the "freak" is gone when you realize the eyes moved because the movie is just bad... | 0 |
The films drags along at a pretty slow pace without much at all happening. | 0 |
Worst of all, almost no one says anything. | 0 |
Sadly, ol' Jess pads this one out to an astonishing (and, at times, agonizing) 1 hour and 40 minutes when it should have run 80 minutes tops. | 0 |
The film basically just plods along for eighty five minutes and there really aren't many scenes of interest. | 0 |
This film seemed way too long even at only 75 minutes. | 0 |
It becomes incredibly dull & tedious to watch after about 10 minutes & don't forget this thing goes on for 94 minutes in it's uncut state. | 0 |
Not only is it a disgustingly made low-budget bad-acted movie, but the plot itself is just STUPID! | 0 |
All in all, it's miserably forgettable. | 0 |
to say I was disappointed by the end result is an understatement. | 0 |
it's cringe worthy material. | 0 |
I did not like the idea of the female turtle at all since 1987 we knew the TMNT to be four brothers with their teacher Splinter and their enemies and each one of the four brothers are named after the great artists name like Leonardo , Michelangleo, Raphel and Donatello so Venus here doesn't have any meaning or playing any important part and I believe that the old TMNT series was much more better than that new one which contains Venus As a female turtle will not add any action to the story we like the story of the TMNT we knew in 1987 to have new enemies in every part is a good point to have some action but to have a female turtle is a very weak point to have some action, we wish to see more new of TMNT series but just as the same characters we knew in 1987 without that female turtle. | 0 |
The actions of the characters, especially of Leopold Kessler played by Jean-Marc Barr seem confused, and lack credibility. | 0 |
The plot is terrible. | 0 |
End of preview. Expand
in Dataset Viewer.
We maximized the information within the multi-sentence input reviews of the original IMDb dataset (stanfordnlp/imdb) and transformed it into a single-sentence format. This transformation aims to make benchmark studies more compatible with datasets containing single-sentence inputs (SST-2, HateSpeech, Tweet-Emotion, etc.)
Tasks we performed to obtain this dataset:
- (1) We fine-tuned the RoBERTa model (roberta-base) on the raw IMDb dataset, achieving a classification accuracy of 94.6% for sentiment analysis. We published this fine-tuned sentiment classifier on HuggingFace under EgehanEralp/roberta-base-imdb-ft for public access.
- (2) We split the sentences in each train and test sample of the IMDb dataset's input reviews.
- (3) For each sentence in every review, we queried our fine-tuned RoBERTa sentiment classifier model to obtain sentiment predictions.
- (4) For positive reviews, we selected the sentences with the highest confidence positive label predictions by the model, retaining these sentences within the original multi-sentence reviews and deleting all other sentences.
- (5) For negative reviews, we selected the sentences with the highest confidence negative label predictions by the model, retaining these sentences within the original multi-sentence reviews and deleting all other sentences.
We created a single-sentence IMDb dataset, representing each multi-sentence review with the sentence containing the most sentiment. This strategy allowed us to select and use the sentences that best represented the sentiment of the original reviews.
- Downloads last month
- 3