Datasets:

EgehanEralp

/

imdb-single-sentence

like 1

Even when this movie was made, the cynic was the stereotypical hero, and the one Stewart portrays really has few saving graces.

This is the worst sequel on the face of the world of movies.

The problem is that this sequel is horrible, not even unintentionally funny and tries to imitate the original.

This sequel, to me, just wasn't on target as much as the original, with a lot of the humor less effective and more obvious.

It must have had a very low budget because a fair amount of the movie must have been filmed with a regular video camera.

I'm not sure if maybe these scenes had to be shot later and at that time they didn't have the money to shoot on film (I assume this is why, anyway), but it is disorienting and really makes the film look shoddier than it had to look.

It was a complete waste of my time and it WILL be a waste of yours.

In the first movie, he had a "reason" to kill people, but in this sequal, half of the killingsattempted killings were basicly for no reason.

So, I tune in for the airing this evening and was extremely disappointed.

The acting was not good and the plot wasn't even remotely interesting.

Any humor is not of the funny kind.

I've personally seen better acting in soap operas, it is so pitiful that you just have to laugh.

The whole Movie within a Movie crap.

As for the quality of the production, the continuityediting is poor enough to induce cringing, and the lighting is, perhaps, even worse than that, but you hardly have time to notice because the script is so bad.

The plot is stupid.

The actual show-runner, Brannon Braga, didn't help matters by his uninspired and tired rehashing of previous Trek episodes and careless disregard of the franchise's internal mythology (it was painfully obvious early on that he was in it only for the paycheck).

I don't blame her for not being involved with this mess.

How dumb are these writersAny ways, just saying if Enterprise is on DON'T WATCH IT!

The central plot didn't reflect or do justice to the grand theme of the series.

I didn't see anything all that interesting in this pilot.

Although Turturro is an actor I generally like, his Luzhin often resembled a bad Rain Man impression and the portrayal of the genius as a semi-autistic man was annoying.

whih in itelf is not such a crime, but towards the end, the tremendous plot-twists get very tiresome and boring.

The story is pointless.

I found myself looking at my watch just 40 minutes into this, being bored to death.

I therefor found it strange that she would appear in a film that so distorted that facts.

Other than that, libelous!

The scenes did not flow smoothly and the characters were odd.

I watched it both dubbed and with subtitles and both were equally bad and hard to understand....

That's not a good sign.

Either the subtitling was very poor or the actual dialog doesn't make much of story and give any character development.

All these horrific scenes are given little screen time, and are instead surrounded by moments of pixie-dust cinematography, a meddlesome symphonic score, incongruous comedy and overly exuberant camera work.

) The way Spielberg directs this is so contrived, so meddlesome.

There is nothing good in the movie.

Total waist of money and free time, have watched a lot of movies, were as horror is my all time favorite, I really am speechless, have nothing more to say that please don't do the effort to watch something so daft, please understand

This has to be the worst movie I've seen in a long long time.

At least that movie is so unbelievably bad that you'll laugh harder than you thought possible.

They do what they can with the material they've got, but a lackluster script doesn't really do them any justice.

Everyone else: this is just a very bad horror flick.

Not only is the movie bad, it isn't even sure who the killer is; the final "twist" is more "Huh"?

It's a shame that I actually sat through this movie, this very tiresome and predictable movie.

And the moment the killer comes on screen, you know who it is, it's just sssssssssssooooooooooooo predictable.

Firstly, there are some good things about this film, but it's all cliche slasher stuff combined with a teen movie.

It's not scary, it's not clever, and it's not funny.

This movie had the potential to be a great movie, but it failed.

It was a dull,not very entertaining movie.

There just wasn't much to it.

They are so unbelievably formulaic.

Even the acting is mediocre at best.

This is, of course, completely unnecessary, because it's so obvious from how badly he plagiarizes the film.

Valentine had no chance of being a good movie.

The plot sucks, and the acting is the worst I've seen.

Big disappointment and not really "a modern cannibal tale".

It's just not what it claims to be on the cover and in the plot summary.

Absurd.

Other than the interesting sex scenes, you'll be bored dry watching this film.

And its sex scenes, at one time the subject of sensational obscenity trials, look pretty tame in a modern context.

Throughout the film the sound was echoy, garbled and much of the dialog was unintelligible.

gosh the same ones who watch Fashion TV day and night - watching girls between the age group of 14 to 40 ...

The whole concept of the movie is ridiculous and absolutely implausible.

Absurd.

The only redeeming quality of the movie is the exquisite beauty of the leading actresses.

I get the impression, however, that the producers of this movie took themselves way to seriously, like they were putting together a 10-star classic, complete with poor attempts at poignant lines and dumb camera shots.

The script is dismal, peppered with clichéd lines, "Are you ready, Pardner"?

Instead of sticking to its main topic the film veers in other directions leading to its downfall.

But unfortunately we can't sympathize with "our hero" (how he is called by the story-teller), because he is unnecessarily and incomprehensibly tired of company and himself.

Blank check is one of those kids movies that could have been a great suspense thriller for the kids but instead it's a tired lame home alone ripoff that isn't worth a dime.

I wouldn't call Blank Check a bad film but its not really entertaining either.

Also, this was a shallow movie with weak acting, a predictable plot line and characters who are less than memorable.

The worst movie I have seen in a while.

The plot is completely pointless; its overtones of lonliness are pathetic.

Not even worth seeing if someone else rents it.

I saw it as an 11 year old, and even then I thought it was pretty ridiculous!

Very predictable, not interesting at all.

Bad Actors, bad filming, choppy dialog, shallow characters, but then again it was a bad premise in the first place.

It was so pathetically bad all over that I had to figure it was a fourth-rate spoof of Springtime for Hitler.

Adding onto his ever-growing pile of folders left over from Oliver Stone's "eh-I-grew-out-of-it" conspiracy drawer, here's "Down On Us (i.e.- "Beyond the Doors") which is the working definition of historical inaccuracy.

amateurish writing, acting, direction...

Fraught with lousy acting, poor sets and costuming, etc.

Watching the movie I was disappointed that so many changes were made.

The movie let me down!

I was left feeling surprised that Connery, Harris, Fishburn and Capshaw had anything to do with this turkey, individually or collectively.

A suitably convoluted plot was obviously thought to be more important than political consistency.

Two thumbs down.

But it disappoints, and disappoints severely.

Then you hit the last third and everything starts to get increasingly silly until you've got a killer with a flashlight strapped to his forehead threatening to fillet Sean Connery's wife (a typically mannered and unconvincing Kate Capshaw) and kid (a very young Scarlet Johannsen) in an alligator skinner's shack.

It's not particularly original, and the "twists" are downright cruel.

The film makers apparently knew when they pieced this mess together that all they needed were sweet potatoes and pumpkin pie to have Thanksgiving dinner, so to compensate they added an overloud "dramatic" score.

This made this movie look cheap and unreal.

Despite the very talented cast this movie is way too predictable and just downright under-estimates it's audience.

In fact the screenplay doesn't make sense; imagine a 60 min.

To rein in any kudos, a major twist had to be delivered along the way and here it fails palpably too.

The scripting and direction are extremely poor.

This is just a case of a previously worthless island changed into something worthwhile.

* out of ****

It's dumb.

That being said, this movie is so god damn awful I flip between pure joy of seeing a godly body of Traci (Mandy Schaffer) and cringing my eyeballs out for the disaster of a plot.

Unfortunately Mandy Schaeffer (as the daughter) murders more than people - she delivers such a terrible performance that she also wipes out the movie, though the incoherent script, useless direction and appalling music (check out the saxophone the first time she displays her bikini-clad bod) don't help any; we're supposed to find her sexy and scary, but she fails on both counts.

This movie is so bad, I knew how it ends right after this little girl killed the first person.

We're talking really bad directing.

The plot is very bad, but as bad as it is it does not compare to the special effects.