text
stringlengths
1
1.64k
label
int64
0
1
It was possibly the worst movie I've ever had the displeasure of sitting through.
0
Sloppily directed, witless comedy that supposedly spoofs the "classic" 50s "alien invasion" films, but really is no better than them, except of course in the purely technical department (good makeup effects).
0
Its a bad bad movie thats not worth seeing except as a Milligan completeist or because its got some good looking people fooling around.
0
This film is such a foundationally inaccurate depiction of Artemisia Gentileschi's life that it almost made me weep.
0
As others have noted, this movie is criminally inaccurate in its portrayal of the artist's life and I for one was very annoyed and offended...
0
and plasters it with sex and scandal to make the whole film, well, interesting, but not remarkable.
0
Otherwise, you are wasting your time.
0
But it's simply bizarre -- by all accounts the true story of this artist would have made for a far better film, so why did they come up with this dishwater-dull script?
0
Very disappointing choice by the makers of this film.
0
Inconcievably (or perhaps it should have been expected), Artemisia's entire character and all that she stands for, had been reduced to a standard Hollywood, female character; a pitiful, physically flawless, helpless little creature, displaying none of the character traits that actually got her that place in history which was being mutilated here.
0
The level of language was too familiar and too contemporary for an action taking place in 1610, and it took away most of the magic of the film.
0
I was disgusted by this movie.
0
The script is awful -- pretentious, stilted, and vapid -- and its rewriting of the facts is unusually offensive even in a genre that all too often makes its living by distorting, rather than retelling, history.
0
That's "sexy" -- the truth is boring and seems too feministpolitically correct.
0
Any time a movie is so myopic in its desire to present a particular ending or viewpoint that it simply doesn't bother with an actual story, it's annoying.
0
The movie was just all too painful.
0
Unfortunately, the film turns out to be hopelessly unbelievable and mushy despite Ms. Francis' best efforts.
0
The whole film is so cheap, so implausible and so careless that it feels infected by a sour cynicism on the part of everyone who made it: Warner Bros tossing garbage to dolts who don't know, in Warner Bros' cynical estimation of them, that what they're getting is garbage.
0
Also, the sets and costumes looked like B-movie stuff.
0
Don't waste your time with this movie; read the book instead.
0
The story itself was OK.
0
Their scenes that they share together are pointless and honestly void of any emotion.
0
Flat-out embarrassing.
0
It's so stupid and vulgar it lowers itself to high art.
0
What a waste!
0
The soundtrack had only 2-3 widely-recognizable hits (not the smash compilation others had mentioned) and the frequent voice-overs were terrible.
0
the editing is el crapo, the plot is incredibly thin and stupid...
0
Alas, no dice for her or of the other gorgeous actress that appeared here: Stacey Nelkin who's supposed to be a teen but was actually 20 when she made this.
0
Avoid this like the plague, annoying music throughout, terrible editing, no comedy, its tackier than a novelty mug...
0
lack of coherent writing?
0
The story was just plain bad and obnoxious.
0
This movie is not in anyway funny, it tries to be funny with it's lame humor, which is so dry and boring that the movie is just 2 hours of torture.
0
It starts out immensely boring, and TOTALLY inane.
0
The jokes, if you could call them that, were so predictable as to be pathetic.
0
Plus The script is absolutely atrocious, I can't believe someone can came out with such crappy ideas.
0
All in all, a bland piece of crap.
0
First, the script is stupid and not funny at all, relying on tired, recycled jokes and a farting turtle for laughs.
0
The delivery is sub-par and very formulaic.
0
Sure, I like short cartoons, but I didn't like this one.
0
), a dancing chorus, and The Mills Brothers -- it only makes it worse.
0
This was,in so many ways, an anti-American movie.
0
Cage simply never settles into his role.
0
The Rest: a thin plotline, Nicholas Cage's performance, and a totally unhumorous and weak attempt to portray an Italian-American family from New York.
0
No closure, bad script, and doesn't have enough extension of minor characters.
0
The whole story was stupid, the acting was uninspired, the 'drama' was emotionless.
0
but had no idea what, and came up with this crappy show.
0
Decent enough premise: odd couple + fish out of water + high jinx.
0
Amanda Bynes' talent is completely wasted.
0
It got a boring cast, although A.Bynes is okej in her perky way, the rest is just stereotypical crap....
0
The wedding was completely unconvincing and a dumb finish.
0
Overall, this film failed in its aim, which was to draw attention to a little-known act of resistance, which is a shame, because done better, it could have had a major impact.
0
The storytelling (storyline) is bad.
0
The entire character of Ruth is so one dimensional, so stereotypical.
0
This game wouldn't even be worth renting.
0
But now most of them is dumb, cheaply made and boring.
0
I had hopes that there would be new ideas and influences, but there were none.
0
Just a stilted rip-off of the infinitely better "Murder, She Wrote", it is absolutely amazing that this poorly-written garbage lasted for a full eight years.
0
It's a completely predictable story that goes nowhere.
0
Secondly, the overall sloppiness of the production, with dialogues that were barely understandable.
0
But - sorry to be prosaic - where is the evidence for this?
0
This speech is reduced to outdated psychological platitudes: it-ego-super ego, anal phase, sexual insufficiency.
0
He seems to regard logic, proof, common-sense, and reason as enemies or mere throwaway toys; concepts to be either avoided, twisted to fit the end-goal, or simply annihilated.
0
I gave this four because of the acting, but the story is lame.
0
Better off with mindless crap than this pile of junk.
0
But again, it really doesn't.
0
This is really not that good.
0
We know who the bad guys are from the beginning, and just follow along as they fall like dominoes.
0
The characters are boring, John Cusack's accent is laughable, and the plotline teeters between boring and laughable.
0
> What a dud.
0
However, it was a big disappointment and I actually left very angry at what Disney had done.
0
No mention of the grown cubs impending deaths due to the same plight their father endured, no warning of trouble for future generations if we don't get our act together, nothing.
0
Aside from incredible cinematography, it was a typical Disney disappointment for me.
0
i feel that we are due for something as ground breaking as Koyannisquatsi (sic) and this movie is certainly not it
0
Then in typical, comic relief fashion we get to see the magnificent Birds-of-Paradise perform mating rituals to the most annoying and stupid narration humanly possible.
0
We were very very disappointed , as I think 90% of the footage is from "Planet Earth" .
0
But the melodramatic point of view just doesn't cut it for me, moreover if a predator finally catches up on a prey (one exception left there) the camera zooms out or skips to another scene.
0
The movie is silly, stupid, and finally laughable with the way realism is sometimes used, sometimes not.
0
It is obvious that the money is the key issue here: the time and energy put into the script is nowhere near enough, and as a result, "Hollow Man" is seriously undermined with clichés, sappy characters, predictability and lack of any depth whatsoever.
0
Even the name of the film is as hopeless as the movie itself, and not even impressive special effects come anywhere near saving this one, which should be avoided at all costs.
0
Unfortunately these things didn't matter at all.
0
But then what could I have expected from the director of SHOWGIRLS, which, btw, is much more entertaining than this stilted & bad film.
0
There are a couple of bare breasts, a really lame dirty joke and enough out of place swearing to give this movie an R-rating that it really didn't need.
0
The story is just poor and so, everything fails.
0
Elisabeth Shue comports herself well in the role of Linda McKay, Caine's willing accomplice in the ill-fated experiment, but it's basically a thankless part that offers little challenge, especially to an actor of Shue's caliber.
0
However, this movie is stupid and generally doesn't come near to explaining the point or technical aspect of the subject matter, and instead settles for predictable action without any enjoyment.
0
Unfortunately, one of the best efforts yet made in the area of special effects has been made completely pointless by being placed alongside a lumbering, silly and equally pointless plot and an inadequate, clichéd screenplay.
0
This film has nothing of note in it.
0
Other than some neat special effects, this movie has nothing to offer.
0
I'm not sure why; perhaps it's that I don't want Kevin Bacon to be evil, and there's disappointment in that.
0
Because, there's nothing else there to show.
0
It's not worth picking apart the story.
0
I wouldn't recommend this movie to anyone, man or woman, that has any form of self-respect to account for.
0
The other principals are Elisabeth Shue and Josh Brolin, neither of whom are gifted enough to make a solid impression and who, when forced to deliver inane dialogue, embarrass themselves.
0
Clever special effects, dire script, non-existent plot.
0
That's what I found myself saying time after time in the remarkably inept 3rd act of this sorry excuse for a film.
0
He's just plain bad.
0
It all falls apart after that, it's your typical Hollywood thriller now, filmed on a soundstage with special effects galore, minus any kind of humour, wit or soul.
0
Except a few notable exceptions i.e "The city on the edge of forever" , "assignment Earth" and "Tomorrow is Yesterday" The old series of Star Trek needs to be seriously moth-balled and put out of it's boring misery.
0
Whatever it is, the creators of "The Day Time Ended" (good old John 'Bud' Cardos of "Kingdom of the Spiders" and writer David Schmoeller of "Tourist Trap") must have been sniffing quite a lot glue when they penned down the ideas for this demented hodgepodge of genres.
0
In my experience, it was just not strong enough.
0