Patent Document

FIELD 
     The field relates to security techniques, and more particularly to content randomization techniques for thwarting malicious software (malware) attacks. 
     BACKGROUND 
     Today, sophisticated yet highly available malware enables fraudsters to automate transfers from victims&#39; online accounts, as well as perpetrate other acts of fraud. For example, the malware waits for the legitimate user to log in to a web site associated with the account and then activates a script which initiates a fraudulent money transfer without the customer knowing. This attack is known as a Man-In-The-Browser (MITB) attack. Another form of attack is to “inject” additional fields in web pages in order to obtain information on the victim in addition to the information already requested by the legitimate web site. 
     These two types of attacks are incredibly hard to stop. MITB is a huge problem today as anti-fraud systems search for characteristics in each money transfer request that do not fit the profile of the user. Yet the problem is that the web site sees this request as being sent from the legitimate machine of the user, and therefore may not be able to detect that it is actually being sent by the malware without the user&#39;s knowledge. 
     SUMMARY 
     Embodiments of the invention provide content randomization techniques for thwarting (reducing or eliminating) malware attacks. 
     In one embodiment, a method comprises the following steps. Content is received at a randomizer module from a first computing device, the content having been retrieved by the first computing device in response to a content request by a second computing device. By way of example only, the first computing device is a web server and the second computing device is a client device. The content is randomly altered at the randomizer module to generate randomly altered content. Log information about the random alteration to the content is maintained at the randomizer module. The randomly altered content is sent from the randomizer module to the first computing device such that the first computing device is able to provide the randomly altered content to the second computing device in response to the content request by the second computing device. 
     In a further embodiment, reply content is received at the randomizer module from the first computing device, the reply content having been received from the second computing device in response to the randomly altered content. The random alteration is removed from the reply content at the randomizer module using the log information. The reply content is sent from the randomizer module to the first computing device after removal of the random alteration. 
     In another embodiment of the invention, a computer program product is provided which comprises a processor-readable storage medium having encoded therein executable code of one or more software programs. The one or more software programs when executed by at least one processor implement steps of the above-described method. 
     In yet another embodiment of the invention, an apparatus comprises a memory and at least one processor operatively coupled to the memory and configured to perform steps of the above-described method. 
     Advantageously, embodiments of the invention provide techniques for thwarting malware attacks including, but not limited to, malware that employs an injection type attack and/or an MITB type attack. By randomizing content that the malware acts upon, the malware is unable to perform its intended function. 
     These and other features and advantages will become more readily apparent from the accompanying drawings and the following detailed description. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         FIGS. 1A through 1D  illustrate how two types of malware attacks associated with web site content are performed. 
         FIG. 2  illustrates a distributed computer system with web site content randomization functionality in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. 
         FIG. 3  illustrates a web site content randomization methodology in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. 
         FIG. 4  illustrates a computing device architecture for one or more elements of the distributed computer system with web site content randomization functionality of  FIG. 2 . 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     Illustrative embodiments of the invention will be described herein with reference to an exemplary system in which a user device (referred to herein as a user machine or client device) communicates with a server (referred to herein as a web server). It is to be appreciated, however, that embodiments of the invention are not limited to use in this or any other particular system configuration. 
     Before describing illustrative content randomization embodiments of the invention, examples of how a fraudster may implement an injection attack and an MITB attack will be described. 
       FIGS. 1A through 1C  illustrate an example of the HTML (HyperText Markup Language) injection attack. In the HTML injection attack, the user machine is infected with malware, perhaps inadvertently downloaded from an email attachment or some other selected link or downloaded file. The HTML injection attack malware detects when the user accesses a subject HTML page online, and before the HTML page is displayed to the user on his/her display screen, the malware inserts one or more additional fields into the HTML of the page to request additional user data. 
     For example, consider the typical login page  102  in  FIG. 1A  which includes a username field  104  and a password field  106 . To perform the HTML injection, the malware looks for certain string tokens in order to identify the location in the HTML code in which it should insert (inject) the HTML code to request the additional data from the user. So in the example in  FIG. 1A , assume that the malware searches the HTML code for the string token  108  shown in  FIG. 1B . String token  108  is the HTML code that represents the password field  106  on login page  102 . Thus, the malware uses the password field  106  to pinpoint the location after which to insert additional HTML code. 
     Once the malware finds the string token  108 , the malware inserts/injects further HTML after the string token  108  that requests the additional user data. In this example, the malware inserts HTML code that renders an additional field  112  that asks for a credit card number of the user. The altered HTML page  110  is shown in  FIG. 1C . Since page  110  generally appears to look like the login page (i.e., page  102 ) the user is accustomed to seeing when accessing the subject web site, the user enters his/her credit card information. The credit card information is then captured by the malware and reported to the fraudster for use in fraudalent transactions (e.g., unauthorized online purchases). 
     Turning to the MITB type of malware attack, again the user machine is infected with malware that is somehow dowloaded without the user being aware of its presence. The malware waits for the user to log in to a web site and then activates a script. Script, as used here, refers to a simple program language, e.g., a function/procedure of the malware program that executes. The script causes an action to be taken via the user&#39;s browser without the user&#39;s knowledge or permission.  FIG. 1D  illustrates an HTML POST command (i.e., client POSTs data back to the server) executed by the script  114  which initiates a fraudulent transfer of money out of the user&#39;s bank account. 
     It is to be understood that while the examples above illustrate HTML-based malware attacks, injection and MITB type malware exists that performs similar fraudalent actions on Javascript-based source code. 
     Embodiments of the invention provide techniques for thwarting malware attacks including, but not limited to, injection and MITB type attacks. For example, in one embodiment, randomization is added to the source code of the subject web site per session such that the randomization does not impact the user experience or the back-end logic, yet thwarts the malware&#39;s attempt to inject or perform actions on behalf of the user. As illustrated above, in order to perform an injection or issue a fraudulent transfer (MITB), the malware searches for string tokens within the web site&#39;s source code (HTML or Javascript), and then alters or uses that same code on the fly. It is important to emphasize that all of this is happening on the end-user&#39;s machine. By randomizing the source code, the malware will fail to find the tokens and thus fail to perform its intended actions. As will be explained, such content randomization can be done in a variety of ways. In one embodiment, form fields which are submitted to the web site are given randomized generated names, e.g., instead of field name “username” every session, that field will have a different string. In another embodiment, a set of non-visible paragraphs are added into the web site in order to randomize the expected format of the source code, without appearing to the end-user. 
     The content randomization is performed on the server (back-end) side. The source code is randomized and then the user&#39;s response is de-randomized (removal of the randomization) for the back-end. In the “de-randomizing” process, the system can also be used to search and identify suspicious malicious activity. For example, if malware sends additional fields to the site that were not presented to the user, the system could block the transaction and terminate the session, while also alerting authorities (e.g., bank or web site operator/owner) in the process. 
       FIG. 2  illustrates a distributed computer system with web site content randomization functionality in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. This figure illustrates content randomization at the server side. 
     As shown, system  200  comprises a user machine  202 , a web server  206  and a randomizer module  208 . The user machine  202  and the web server  206  are coupled via a network  204 . The network  204  may comprise, for example, a global computer network such as the Internet, a wide area network (WAN), a local area network (LAN), a satellite network, a telephone or cable network, or various portions or combinations of these and other types of networks. The randomizer module  208  is shown as being separate from the web server  206  in  FIG. 2 . In such a case, the randomizer module  208  and the web server  206  are coupled by the network  204  or some other network. However, alternatively, the randomizer module  208  can be implemented within the web server  206  as a software component resident on the web server  206 . The web server  206  and the randomizer module  208  provide a protected online service  210  (content randomization to thwart malware) to the user machine  202 . 
     It is to be appreciated that an embodiment of the invention may comprise multiple instances of a user machine, a web server, a randomizer module and/or other system components not expressly shown, although only single instances of components are shown in  FIG. 2  for the sake of clarity of illustration. 
     As used herein, the term “session” refers to an interactive information interchange. For example, an online session is shown in  FIG. 2  between the user machine  202  and the web server  206 , while a randomization session is shown in  FIG. 2  between the web server  206  and the randomizer module  208 . 
     The user machine  202  may comprise a portable device, such as a mobile telephone, personal digital assistant (PDA), wireless email device, game console, etc. The user machine  202  may alternatively comprise a desktop or laptop personal computer (PC), a microcomputer, a workstation, a mainframe computer, a wired telephone, a television set top box, or any other information processing device which can benefit from the use of content randomization techniques in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. 
     The user machine  202  may also be referred to herein as simply a “user.” The term “user” should be understood to encompass, by way of example and without limitation, a user device, a person utilizing or otherwise associated with the device, or a combination of both. An operation described herein as being performed by a user may therefore, for example, be performed by a user device, a person utilizing or otherwise associated with the device, or by a combination of both the person and the device. 
     The web server  206  may be, for example, an application server such as a web site or other software program or hardware device that is accessed by the user machine  202  over the network  204 . 
     The randomizer module  208  may be, for example, a server or other software program or hardware device that is accessed by the web server  206  over the network  204  (when remote from the web server) or directly (when resident on the web server). 
       FIG. 3  illustrates a web site content randomization methodology  300  in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. Reference will be made to the system  200  in  FIG. 2 . However, methodology  300  can be implemented in other system configurations. 
     In step  302 , the user machine  202  accesses the web server  206  and establishes an online session. The user machine  202 , in step  304 , requests an HTML page (an example of the more general term “content”) from the web server  206 . 
     In step  306 , the web server  206  connects to the randomizer module  208  and a randomization session is established. The web server  206 , in step  308 , sends the HTML page requested by the user machine  202  to the randomizer module  208 . 
     In step  310 , the randomizer module randomly alters (randomizes) the HTML page. For example, as mentioned above, this may comprise randomly inserting one or more redundant HTML elements/tags into the code of the HTML page. Alternatively, this may comprise randomly obfuscating (obscuring) one or more HTML input field names in the code of the HTML page. The randomizer module  208 , in step  312 , maintains a log of randomizations per randomization session, i.e., it keeps a history of which randomizations were applied to which HTML pages. In step  314 , the randomizer module  208  sends the randomized HTML page to the web server  206 . 
     In step  316 , the web server  206  sends the randomized HTML page to the user machine  202  in reply to original request. The user machine  202 , in step  318 , submits reply credentials such as login credentials back to web server  206  (i.e., POST data). In step  320 , the web server  206  sends the POST data to the randomizer module  208 . 
     In step  322 , the randomizer module  208  uses the randomization session log data to remove the randomization from the POST data. The randomizer module  208 , in step  324 , sends the POST data with the randomization removed back to the web server  206 . 
     Multiple requests and replies between the user machine  202  and the web server  206  may be performed in a similar manner as described above with respect to steps  304  through  324 . 
     Recall the injection attack described above in the context of  FIGS. 1A through 1C . Since the HTML page has been randomized, as described in methodology  300  of  FIG. 3 , the injection will fail to locate the pre-defined locations and therefore the malware attack will be foiled. 
     Similarly, in the MITB attack described above in the context of  FIG. 1D , recall that the malware scripts must know the field names into which they must provide the transaction-related data. By randomizing the field names, as described in methodology  300  of  FIG. 3 , the MITB scripts will attempt to POST field names (and values) that are non-existent in the current online session. By POSTing field names that are not part of the randomization manifest, the MITB attack will fail. More particularly, when the malware performs an MITB attack, using an automated script, it attempts to POST the data relating to the fraudulent transaction back to the web server, providing values for [payeeAccount] and [amount]. Because the randomizer module has obfuscated these field names (for example, into [1a983jfhsdf81ASskfg] and [8sdfKSDn38hf], respectively), the fields POSTed by the malware will not be known to (recognized by) the randomizer module, since the randomizer module is expecting [1a983jfhsdf81ASskfg] and instead receives [payeeAccount]. As such, the de-randomization will fail and a notice of such failure will be returned to the web server. This is how the automated MITB script is thwarted. 
       FIG. 4  illustrates a computing device architecture for one or more components of the distributed computer system with web site content randomization functionality (system  200 ) of  FIG. 2 . That is, computing device architecture  400  in  FIG. 4  may be respectively implemented by the user machine  202 , the web server  206  and the randomizer module  208 . The computing device architecture  400 , as illustrated, comprises a processor  402 , a memory  404 , input/output devices  406  and network interface  408 , all coupled via a bus  410 . 
     The processor  402  may comprise a microprocessor, a microcontroller, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or other type of processing circuitry, as well as portions or combinations of such circuitry elements. 
     The memory  404  may be viewed as an example of what is more generally referred to herein as a “computer program product.” A computer program product comprises a processor-readable storage medium having encoded therein executable code of one or more software programs. Such a memory may comprise electronic memory such as random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM) or other types of memory, in any combination. The computer program code when executed by a processing device such as the processor  402  causes the device to perform functions associated with one or more of the components of the distributed computer system  200 . One skilled in the art would be readily able to implement such software given the teachings provided herein. Other examples of computer program products embodying embodiments of the invention may include, for example, optical or magnetic disks. 
     The input/output devices  406  may comprise one or more mechanisms for inputting data to the processor  402  (e.g., keyboard, keypad or pointing device), and one or more mechanisms for providing results or otherwise presenting information associated with the processor  402  (e.g., display, screen or other form of presentation device). 
     The network interface  408  comprises circuitry that serves to interface the computing device (e.g., user machine  202 , web server  206 , randomizer module  208 , etc.) with a network (e.g., network  204 ) and/or other system components. Such circuitry may comprise conventional transceivers of a type well known in the art. 
     The computing device architecture  400  may comprise additional known components (not expressly shown) such as parallel processing systems, physical machines, virtual machines, virtual switches, storage volumes, etc. Again, the computing device architecture shown in the figure is presented by way of example only, and system  200  may include additional or alternative computing architectures, as well as numerous distinct computing architectures in any combination. 
     Also, numerous other arrangements of servers, computers, storage devices or other components are possible in the system  200 . Such components can communicate with other elements of the system  200  over any type of network or networks. 
     Furthermore, it is to be appreciated that the system  200  of  FIG. 2  can comprise virtual machines (VMs) implemented using a hypervisor. A hypervisor is an example of what is more generally referred to herein as “virtualization infrastructure.” The hypervisor runs on physical infrastructure. As such, the content randomization techniques illustratively described above as a protected online service can be provided as one or more cloud services. The cloud services thus run on respective ones of the virtual machines under the control of the hypervisor. System  200  may also include multiple hypervisors, each running on its own physical infrastructure. Portions of that physical infrastructure might be virtualized. 
     As is known, virtual machines are logical processing elements that may be instantiated on one or more physical processing elements (e.g., servers, computers, processing devices). That is, a “virtual machine” generally refers to a software implementation of a machine (i.e., a computer) that executes programs like a physical machine. Thus, different virtual machines can run different operating systems and multiple applications on the same physical computer. Virtualization is implemented by the hypervisor which is directly inserted on top of the computer hardware in order to allocate hardware resources of the physical computer dynamically and transparently. The hypervisor affords the ability for multiple operating systems to run concurrently on a single physical computer and share hardware resources with each other. 
     An example of a commercially available hypervisor platform that may be used to implement portions of the system  200  in one or more embodiments of the invention is the VMware® vSphere™ which may have an associated virtual infrastructure management system such as the VMware® vCenter™. The underlying physical infrastructure may comprise one or more distributed processing platforms that include storage products such as VNX and Symmetrix VMAX, both commercially available from EMC Corporation of Hopkinton, Mass. A variety of other storage products may be utilized to implement at least a portion of the cloud services. 
     It should again be emphasized that the above-described embodiments of the invention are presented for purposes of illustration only. Many variations may be made in the particular arrangements shown. For example, although described in the context of particular system and device configurations, the techniques are applicable to a wide variety of other types of information processing systems, computing systems, data storage systems, processing devices and distributed virtual infrastructure arrangements. In addition, any simplifying assumptions made above in the course of describing the illustrative embodiments should also be viewed as exemplary rather than as requirements or limitations of the invention. Numerous other alternative embodiments within the scope of the appended claims will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art.

Technology Category: 3