Patent Document

FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
       [0001]    The present invention relates to a system and a method for transmitting and activating a control data for a programmable personal medical device, in particular for an implantable medical device such as a cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, or the like. In addition, the present invention relates to such a medical device and a source unit for control data. 
       BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
       [0002]    A medical device such as a cardiac pacemaker typically receives new control data several times during its operation, with the control data including matters such as changes to the operating parameters of the cardiac pacemaker, software or firmware updates or commands for the cardiac pacemaker, etc. When programming an implant such as a cardiac pacemaker, a programming session may involve the alteration of some parameters and the issuance of associated commands to the implant, such as a request to restart statistics or to begin detection of patient data, and the transmission of the parameters and commands to the implant. 
         [0003]    When a clinical programmer programs the implant in a clinic, a control datum may be transmitted within a few seconds to the implant, with control data being transmitted to the implant in succession. When control data are remotely programmed and transmitted to the implant, the transmission may take as long as several days. In any event, control data are transmitted in succession, i.e., sequentially. 
         [0004]    As more control data are to be transmitted in sequence and as the transmission grows longer, the more probable it is that at least one control datum will be transmitted incorrectly or incompletely. During a long transmission, an interruption of the transmission by a loss of connection can occur. In addition, during such a transmission, a chronological or logical assignment between different items of data may be lost. The control data thus arrive incomplete or corrupted at the implant, which may result in a malfunction of the implant upon an implementation/execution of the control data (e.g., acceptance of the operating parameters or overriding of the firmware). When firmware is updated via remote programming, the problem additionally results that many reprogrammings must be executed, with only one containing the new implant control software. All reprogrammings connected with the update must become active jointly. If all parts are not provided in the implant, the reprogramming may not occur. 
       SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
       [0005]    The invention seeks to provide a system and a method for executing complete and secure transmission of control data, thereby avoiding the problems described above. 
         [0006]    A preferred version of the invention involves a system for transmitting control data for a programmable personal medical device, in particular an implantable medical device, such as a cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, or the like, having a source unit, a collection unit, and a medical device. The source unit has a data set unit for generating a control data set having a plurality of control data, a check data unit for generating at least one check datum for the control data set, and a transmitting unit for transmitting the control data set and check datum to the collection unit. The collection unit has a receiving unit for receiving the control data set and the check datum, a storage unit for storing the control data set and/or the control data of the control data set, a check unit for checking the integrity of the control data set using the check datum, and a transmitting unit for transmitting the control data to a programmable control unit of the medical device. The medical device has a programmable control unit for controlling functions of the medical device on the basis of the control data. The collection unit is implemented to transmit the control data to the control unit of the medical device only if the integrity of the control data set is established by the check unit. The control unit of the medical device is implemented to execute the control of functions of the medical device on the basis of the control data received from the collection unit. 
         [0007]    The invention also encompasses a method for transmitting control data for a programmable personal medical device, in particular an implantable medical device such as a cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, or the like, having the following steps:
       generating a control data set having a plurality of control data,   generating at least one check datum for the control data set, and   transmitting control data set and check datum to a collection unit,   receiving the control data set,   storing the control data set and/or the control data of the control data set,   receiving the check datum,   checking the integrity of the control data set using the control datum,   transmitting the control data to a programmable control unit of the medical device, and   executing a control of functions of the medical device on the basis of the control data received from the collection unit,
 
wherein the step of transmitting the control data to the programmable control unit only occurs if the integrity of the control data set is established during the checking.
       
 
         [0017]    The invention further encompasses a source unit and a personal programmable medical device. The source unit is used to transmit control data for a programmable personal medical device, in particular an implantable medical device such as a cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, or the like, and includes a data set unit for generating a control data set having a plurality of control data, a check data unit for generating at least one check datum usable for an integrity check of the control data set, and a transmitting unit for transmitting control data set and check datum to a collection unit. 
         [0018]    The programmable personal medical device is particularly an implantable medical device such as a cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, or the like, and includes a collection unit and a programmable control unit, the collection unit having a receiving unit for receiving a control data set comprising control data and a check datum assigned to the control data set, a storage unit for storing the control data set and/or the control data of the control data set, a check unit for checking an integrity of the control data set using the check datum, and a transmitting unit for transmitting the control data to the programmable control unit of the medical device. The programmable control unit is provided for controlling functions of the medical device on the basis of control data. The collection unit is implemented to transmit the control data to the control unit of the medical device only if the integrity of the control data set is established by the check unit, and the control unit of the medical device is implemented to execute the control of functions of the medical device on the basis of the control data received from the collection unit. 
         [0019]    The invention is based on the insight that in the event of a plurality of associated control data, the use of this control data may only be performed reliably if it is ensured in a suitable manner that all control data are also completely provided. The implant may execute the changes at one stroke if and only if an entire packet has been received. It is important for the safety and reliability of the implementation of the control data that either all changes are executed together, or none at all. 
         [0020]    In one version of the invention, the medical device is an active medical implant. Special safety requirements, which are fulfilled by the present invention, exist for the operational safety in particular for an active medical implant. 
         [0021]    In one version of the invention, the medical device is an implantable cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator-cardioverter. Secure communication of programming data or firmware updates according to the invention is advantageous particularly during operation of a cardiac pacemaker or a defibrillator-cardioverter. 
         [0022]    In one version of the invention, the source unit has a programming device for the preparation of control parameters as control data for the control unit. An operator may prepare control parameters for the control unit in a familiar way, using the programming device known to him, without the control parameters having to be transmitted once again separately to the source unit. 
         [0023]    In one version of the invention, the source unit is implemented to provide a control program for the control unit as the control data, the source unit particularly having a server for providing the control program. If the source unit is equipped with a server, the source unit may be supplied easily with control data by setting a firmware update on the server, for example. 
         [0024]    In one version of the invention, the control data have a control parameter and/or a control program. A control data set may have both control parameters and also control programs, also in combination. In particular, in a firmware update, altered control parameters may also be activated together with the update. 
         [0025]    In one version of the invention, the control data include meta-control data for the control unit for using the control data during the control of functions of the medical device, in particular information in regard to a sequence, a chronological succession, and/or a duration of the use of the control data and/or information in regard to a condition for the use of the control data. In addition to the actual control data, information on the use of the control data is contained in the control data set, which allows greater flexibility of the system according to the invention and better response to operator wishes. 
         [0026]    In one version of the invention, the medical device itself has a collection unit. The collection unit may be situated in the medical device itself, so that the medical device does not require an external collection unit. 
         [0027]    In one version of the invention, a collection unit is situated separately from the medical device and may be coupled to the medical device via a data connection, in particular via a wireless data connection having low range, preferably according to a medical implant communication service specification, the collection unit preferably being situated in a patient device assigned to the medical device. The collection unit is provided outside the medical device and thus checks incoming control data sets independently of the medical device, the checked control data then being transmitted to the medical device. 
         [0028]    It is also possible according to the invention that the collection unit itself in turn functions as a source unit for transmitting the control data to the medical device, the medical device then having a further collection unit itself. Different source and collection units may be provided in a cascade for different communication sections. 
         [0029]    In one version of the invention, the system includes a combination unit having a receiving unit for receiving a first and a second control data set from a source unit, a storage unit for storing the first and the second control data sets and/or the control data of the first and/or second control data set, a check data unit for generating at least one combination check datum for a third control data set comprising the first and the second control data sets, and a transmitting unit for transmitting the third control data set and the combination check datum to the collection unit, the combination unit preferably also having a check unit for checking an integrity of the first and the second control data sets using a first and a second check datum received from the receiving unit, the combination unit being implemented only to transmit the third control data set to the collection unit if an integrity of the first and the second control data sets is established by the check unit. The combination unit includes both functionalities of a source unit and also a collection unit, so that different control data sets, for example, from different source units or in (chronological) succession from one source unit, may be combined into a combined control data set. The combination unit is represented as a type of collection unit in relation to a source unit, while it acts as a source unit in relation to a collection unit. 
         [0030]    In one version of the invention, the check datum includes an identifier establishing an integral control data set, in particular a unique identifier, preferably a checksum and/or a hash value. The generation of a unique value from the control data set represents a simple way to identify and be able to check the control data set. Checksums or hash values which uniquely identify a control data set are especially advantageous, i.e., practically no other control data set results in the same hash value or the same checksum, so that an alteration of the control data set is recognized in any case. Non-unique check data may also be used, if the probability for incorrectly assumed integrity is small enough. 
         [0031]    In one version of the invention, the check datum includes a control data set end signal to indicate a complete transmission of the control data set, preferably in combination with a control data set start signal. Upon a transmission of a signal indicating a start of the control data set and a signal indicating an end of the control data set, it may at least be assumed upon arrival of the control data set end signal that the connection has not been lost during the transmission, because otherwise the end signal would not have arrived. As soon as the end signal indicates the completeness of the control data set, the entire control data set may thus be processed as a whole. 
         [0032]    In one version of the invention, the control data set end signal and the control data set start signal are each provided with an identifier, which allows an assignment of control data set start signal and control data set end signal to one another. An identification of the start and end signals is used for identification and allows, inter alia, different control data sets to be transmitted in parallel without the end and start signals being confused with one another. 
         [0033]    In one version of the invention, the check unit is implemented to transmit a characterization of the control data set and/or the control data forming the control data set to the check data unit, the check data unit generating the check datum on the basis of the characterization and the transmitting unit being implemented for separate transmission of control data set and check datum. One possibility for checking the integrity according to the invention includes a query at the point which has output the control data set, the query appending the required information to the received control data set, so that a comparison between the control data set to be transmitted or transmitted and the received control data set is possible. A transmission of the check datum in the form of a confirmation of the completeness and correctness is performed on the basis of this comparison. 
         [0034]    In one version of the invention, the source unit is implemented to generate and transmit a fourth data set and a fourth check datum having an urgency indicator after a transmission of the first control data set, the collection unit being implemented to interrupt the processing of the first control data set if the collection unit receives the fourth control data set having the urgency indicator. In this case, the transmission of a specially identified control data set, which may also contain a single control datum here, at least suspends the processing of prior control data sets, so that this special control data set may be processed as rapidly as possible in case of emergency and reach its goal, for example. 
         [0035]    In one version of the invention, the collection unit is implemented to abort the processing as an interruption and empty of the storage unit of control data of the first control data set. Upon an interruption of the processing, the processing of the control data set may not only be suspended as a whole, but rather completely aborted, the received control data being removed from the storage unit. 
         [0036]    In one version of the invention, the collection unit is implemented to reassume the processing of the control data set after a processing of the fourth control data set, the control unit being implemented to retain the received first control data set and/or the received control data of the first control data set in addition to the fourth control data set and/or the control data of the fourth control data set. Alternatively (or additionally) to the abort described above, the system is also capable of reassuming the processing in the event of an interruption after processing the interrupting (emergency) control data set. 
         [0037]    Further advantageous versions of the invention result in particular by combination of features of the claims and from the following description of preferred exemplary versions of the invention. 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         [0038]    The invention is explained in greater detail hereafter on the basis of preferred exemplary versions with reference to the appended figures. In the figures: 
           [0039]      FIG. 1  shows a schematic illustration of an exemplary version of the invention, 
           [0040]      FIG. 2  schematically shows a sequence for preparing a control data set, 
           [0041]      FIGS. 3   a - 3   c  show schematic sequences of an exemplary version of the invention, and 
           [0042]      FIGS. 4   a - 4   d  show schematic sequences of another exemplary version of the invention. 
       
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
       [0043]      FIG. 1  shows a schematic illustration of an exemplary version of the invention. The system  10  includes a first and a second source unit  15 , a collection unit  20 , an implant  25 , and a combination unit  30 . 
         [0044]    The first and the second source unit  15  are constructed essentially identically, operate corresponding to one another, and each include a data set unit  35 , a check data unit  40 , a transmitting unit  45 , a programming device  50 , and a server  55 . The collection unit  20  includes a receiving unit  60 , a storage unit  65 , a check unit  70 , and a transmitting unit  75 . The implant  25  includes a programmable control unit  80  and a separate collection unit  20 ′, which is constructed and operates fundamentally like the foregoing collection unit  20 . The combination unit  30  includes a receiving unit  60 ′ similar to the receiving unit  60  of the collection unit  20 , a storage unit  65 ′ similar to the storage unit  65  of the collection unit  20 , a check unit  70 ′ similar to the check unit  70  of the collection unit  20 , a check data unit  40 ′ similar to the check data unit  40  of the source unit(s)  15 , and a transmitting unit  45 ′ similar to the transmitting unit  45 ′ of the source unit(s)  15 . 
         [0045]    A physician prepares control data in the form of control parameters for the implant  25  using the programming device  50  of the source unit  15 . An alternative to this preparation includes the provision of a control data set with a firmware update in the server  55  of the source unit  15 . In any case, the prepared control data are compiled by the data set unit  35  into a control data set, for which the check data unit  40  prepares a checksum as the check datum. The control data set and the check datum are sent to the collection unit  20  via the transmitting unit  45 . Alternatively, the control data set and the check datum may also be sent to the collection unit  20 ′ of the implant  25  or to the combination unit  30 . 
         [0046]    The collection unit  20  receives the control data set and the check datum using the receiving unit  60  and stores the control data from the control data set in the storage unit  65 . The check unit  70  of the collection unit  25  also generates a checksum of the control data set in a way which corresponds to that of the check data unit  40 . If a comparison of the transmitted checksum to the checksum generated in the collection unit results in a correspondence, the integrity of the control data set is thus assumed. The control data are therefore transmitted to the control unit  80  of the implant  25 , where they are implemented. 
         [0047]    The combination unit  30  is designed to accept control data sets and check data from both source units  15  via the receiving unit  60 ′. The control data and/or control data sets are stored in the storage unit  65 ′, the check unit  70 ′ again generating checksums and performing a comparison. In case of a positive result, the control data sets recognized as complete and correct are combined into a joint control data set, a combination check datum for the combination control data set again being generated by the check data unit  40 ′. The combined control data set is transmitted with the combination check datum either to the collection unit  20  or directly to the implant  25  (more precisely its collection unit  20 ′), where the combination control data set and the combination check datum are handled like a control data set and a check datum of the source unit  15 . 
         [0048]    The implant  25  is equipped with a separate collection unit  20 ′, so that it may also directly or indirectly receive control data sets and check data from a source unit  15  or a combination unit  30  and check them for integrity before they are implemented by the control unit  80 . 
         [0049]      FIG. 2  schematically shows an exemplary sequence for preparing a control data set. In step  100 , a control datum for a setting of a first parameter is generated (e.g., parameter  1 →200). In step  105 , a control datum for a setting of a second parameter is generated (e.g., parameter  2 →50). In step  110 , the setting for the second parameter is overwritten (e.g., parameter  2 →100). In step  115 , a control datum for a setting of a third parameter is generated (e.g., parameter  3 →“OFF”). The particular control data are introduced upon their preparation and/or revision into the control data set  200 , which then contains the control data having the desired settings. In step  120 , the termination of the settings is initiated to initiate the transmission of the control data set. In step  125 , the content of the control data set is displayed, so that the user may perform a confirmation in step  130 . In step  135 , the control data set is released for a transmission to an implant. 
         [0050]      FIGS. 3   a - 3   c  show schematic sequences of an exemplary version of the invention.  FIG. 3   a  shows that a control data set  200  is transmitted from a patient device  85 , tuned to the implant  25 , which serves as a relay station to the implant  25 . In the implant  25 , a checksum  205  is calculated from the control data set  200  by a correspondingly programmed CPU or computing unit  90  of the collection unit of the implant  25 . In the event of a correspondence, which is established in step  155 , the predetermined execution of all control data which were contained in the control data set  200  is performed, in step  160 . If the checksums do not correspond, all control data of the control data set  200  are discarded in step  165 . 
         [0051]      FIGS. 4   a - 4   d  show schematic sequences of another exemplary version of the invention. The relay station  85  (the patient device) has obtained a firmware update here and transmits it in smaller packets to the implant  25 . For this purpose, the patient device  85  transmits a control data set start signal  210  to the implant  25  ( FIG. 4   a ). It then transmits the firmware update together with further control data such as new control parameters to the implant  25  ( FIGS. 4   b,    4   c ) in packets  215 ,  215 ′, whose size and number result through the communication protocol between implant  25  and patient device and the extent of the control data and/or the control data set (of the update). After all packets  215 ,  215 ″ have been transmitted, the patient device  65  transmits a control data set end signal  225  to the implant  25  ( FIG. 4   d ). Upon receiving the control data set end signal  225 , the implant assumes that all control data of the control data set  200  have been completely received, because in the event of a communication breakdown between implant  25  and patient device  85 , the control data set end signal would not have arrived. By generating the control data set start and end signals, the patient device  85  at least partially assumes the function of a check data unit and is thus also to be seen as a component of a source unit within the meaning of the invention. 
         [0052]    Upon a transmission of a program (control data) to an implant by remote programming, according to one exemplary version of the invention, a home monitoring service center (HMSC) compiles a data packet having multiple individual changes as in a “shopping basket” and provides the packet with a secure checksum. The implant receives the packet and checks the integrity of the packet on the basis of the checksum. If the packet is intact (the checked checksums correspond), the individual changes contained therein are completely executed. If the packet is incomplete or damaged (the checksum is erroneous), the contained changes are completely discarded, because it cannot be known which individual control data could still possibly be executed in spite of the incompleteness. 
         [0053]    A further exemplary version of the invention relates to the transmission of new firmware to the implant by remote programming. The HMSC sends new implant firmware to a patient device (also called a telex) tuned to the implant. The telex sends a “transaction start” command to the implant. The telex sends a firmware image divided into multiple individual packets to the implant. The telex sends a “transaction end” command to the implant. The implant checks the transmitted firmware on the basis of the checksum upon receipt of the “transaction end” command and activates the new firmware in the event of correctness. If the “transaction end” command is not received, the implant state does not change, and the received parts of the new firmware are discarded (preferably after passage of a specific deadline). 
         [0054]    One exemplary version of the invention relates to an alteration of the implant program using a clinical programmer. On the programming device (programmer), an implant parameter was altered and the program transmitted. Various parameter blocks had to be altered concurrently. Either all alterations are to be executed or none of them. The parameter blocks “SensingBradyCommon” and “BradyModepage” were altered, which are in various positions in the implant. The command “accept program” is to be transmitted, which activates the changes. The command “restart statistics” is to be executed, because after the programming the statistics become inconsistent. The command “detection on” is to be transmitted. The four commands (the alteration of the parameter blocks and the three commands) are compiled into one block (control data set) and transmitted to the implant provided with a checksum. After the completed transmission of the block, the implant checks the checksum and aborts in the event of an erroneous checksum. The parameter blocks “SensingBradyCommon” and “BradyModepage” are assumed at the target position in the implant. The commands “accept program”, “restart statistics”, and “detection on” are executed. The implant transmits a completion acknowledgment to the programming device. 
         [0055]    As an illustration of another exemplary version of the invention, upon transmission of new firmware to the implant by a clinical programmer, the control software of the implant is replaced by a newer version. In addition, the parameter settings are adapted to the new control software and also transmitted to the implant in addition to the new firmware. A firmware update lasts (for example) approximately 3 minutes. During the procedure, the old control software is to be active. After successful transmission, the new control software is activated together with the new parameters at one stroke. A total of (for example) 30 steps must be executed. All steps are transmitted by the programmer into a buffer memory of the implant. The new software and the parameter settings become active at one stroke in the implant with the last step “copy and activate”, if the check of the check data of the transmission of the control data set having the firmware update and the new parameter settings indicates a complete and correctly received control data set. 
         [0056]    The present invention allows the user to execute aftercare via remote programming in a familiar way. He may alter parameters, accept them in a “shopping basket”, alter further parameters (e.g., on another GUI page), also accept them in the “shopping basket”, set an instruction to restart the statistics in the “shopping basket”, and trigger a transmission of the “shopping basket”. The complex reprogrammings combined in the “shopping basket” then occur either completely or not at all. Intermediate states in the implant (half programmed, e.g., due to connection interruption or transmission error) are thus prevented. 
         [0057]    The transmission of a (large and complex) parameter set may preferably be interrupted at any time, so that emergency commands may be transmitted and executed within a short time. 
         [0058]    The described transmission method is generic. Programming may include a sequence of many small blocks and commands. The composition and sequence of the programming may be performed by changes on the HMSC program (remote programming) without altering the implant control software.

Technology Category: 1