Patent Document

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
       [0001]     Embodiments of the present invention generally relate to switches for data-communication networks, and more specifically, to switches for telecommunication networks being reconfigurable to operate in a plurality of modes.  
         [0002]     Telecommunication switches are typically utilized in networks for directing data through circuits which comprise the network. Switches normally have a plurality of inputs and a corresponding number of outputs, so data entering any input line may be routed to any output line. Ideally, the switching function would be performed with one single monolithic integrated circuit, having all the inputs in one side, and all the outputs on the other side. This would permit centralized control for information access and selecting the appropriate input stream for the appropriate output stream. However, the monolithic integrated circuit approach is not realizable given the current limits of semiconductor fabrication technology and desirable switch size.  
         [0003]     Once practical solution this problem is to distribute the switching function amongst an assembly of multiple switching chips, and referring to this assembly as a switch or a switching device within the switching fabric. In order to adequately function, connections must exist from every valid input to every valid output of the switching fabric. One distributed switch architecture which is utilized widely is today is called the “Clos Architecture,” developed by Charles Clos in 1953. This architecture, also known as the Clos switch, may be realized as a multistage, non-blocking network which has the advantage of reduced cost and complexity associated with other switches, such as the traditional crossbar switch.  
         [0004]     A typical logical diagram of a Clos switch is a three-stage switch having inputs (ingress traffic) and outputs (egress traffic) as shown in  FIG. 1 . The first stage is divided into plurality of ingress switches, the second stage is plurality of center switches, and the third stage is plurality of output switches. Each stage contains one or more switching chips, and the sum total these chips produces the switching fabric which allows the direction of data from one input chip to a central stage chip to the appropriate output chip. The ingress and egress switches may be packaged into a plurality (Y) of ingress line modules  110  (LMs) and egress  120  LMs, while the center switches are packaged into a plurality (Z) of switch modules  115  (SMs). One of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate that the separate line modules shown in  FIG. 1  are not necessarily physically distinct devices, and distinct modules are delineated merely as a function of their logical operation. The distinct functionally performed by ingress LMs  110  and egress LMs  120  may be realized on a single piece of hardware configured to operate in either (or more likely, both) mode(s), depending on the direction of the flow of data. Moreover, as shown in  FIG. 1 , LMs  110 ,  120  and SMs  115  are collectively divided into two vertical groups only for comparison with embodiments of the invention presented below.  
         [0005]     Each ingress line module  110  should have at least one logical link to each switch module  115 , and each egress line module  120  should have at least one logical link to each switch module  115 . By logical link, it is meant that an information path exists between two devices so that the two devices can send and/or receive communications to and/or from each other. As used herein, the term “link” is used to refer to a physical link, such as a fiber optic line. Note that a physical link need not be equivalent to a logical link. For example, a physical link may comprise a plurality of logical links and/or a plurality of physical links may comprise a logical link.  
         [0006]     Further referring to  FIG. 1 , ingress traffic, typically coming over one or more links such as fiber optic cables, enters ingress line modules  110 . Line and section overhead data may be terminated at this point, and path overhead data may pass through ingress line module  110  as part of the data stream. Traffic may enter and proceed through ingress line modules  110 , and travel across a plurality of logical links, each denoted as n 1 , to switch modules  115  (which may contain one or more switching chips). These logical links are realized as (physical) links which are formed on the backplane (not shown) supporting the switch fabric, and each logical link n 1  depicted as a single line may consist of one or more links. From SM  115 , traffic travels across n 1  logical links through each egress LM  120 , and then may exit through another link, such as, for example, one or more fiber optic cables.  
         [0007]     Further referring to  FIG. 1 , because each of ingress LM  110  may be connected to SM  115 , and each SM  115  may in turn be symmetrically connected to egress LM  120 , a full complement of center stage switches may be needed in order for a large switching device to operate with full line module bandwidth. In other words, in order to properly make enough connections between all of the inputs and outputs to transport the data supplied by all the ports on each LM, the full complement of center stage switches may be needed in order to create a valid network for passing traffic. This condition may present limitations (such as undesirably high cost) in some low port-count applications when only a few input/output ports are required. As used herein, a port may be an external interface between a line module and a link used to transport data to and from the switch  100 .  
         [0008]     Typically, it is desirable to utilize common hardware whenever possible when realizing a network. Such benefits as reduced overall cost, streamlined maintenance and training, and higher system reliability are associated with hardware standardization. A customer desiring the benefits of standardizing switching equipment would have to purchase a full complement of center stage switches, even if the networking application is a low bandwidth one which may only using one or two line modules. Thus, an unnecessary additional expense is incurred by purchasing common equipment which may be underutilized for the low-bandwidth application. 
     
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0009]     The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate several embodiments of the invention and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.  
         [0010]      FIG. 1  shows an exemplary logical diagram of a conventional Clos switch;  
         [0011]      FIG. 2  shows a top level diagram of illustrating a chassis consistent with embodiments of the invention;  
         [0012]      FIG. 3  shows an exemplary logical diagram of a generic Clos switch consistent with embodiments of the invention;  
         [0013]      FIG. 4  shows a logical diagram of an overlapping Clos switch used for low-bandwidth operation consistent with embodiments of the invention;  
         [0014]      FIG. 5  shows a logical diagram of the Clos switch used for high-bandwidth operation consistent with embodiments of the invention;  
         [0015]      FIG. 6  shows another exemplary logical diagram of a generic Clos switch consistent with another embodiment of the invention;  
         [0016]      FIG. 6A  shows yet another exemplary implementation of a generic Clos switch consistent with an embodiment of the invention;  
         [0017]      FIG. 7  shows switch fabric being reconfigured by a controller module consistent with embodiments of the invention; and  
         [0018]      FIG. 8  shows interconnections on an exemplary backplane consistent with embodiments of the invention;  
         [0019]      FIG. 9  shows a software-based signal flow chart consistent with an exemplary embodiment of the invention. 
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS  
       [0020]     The following detailed description of the invention refers to the accompanying drawings. The same reference numbers in different drawings identify the same or similar elements. Also, the following detailed description does not limit the invention. Instead, the scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims and equivalents thereof.  
         [0021]     The expression “optically communicates” as used herein refers to any connection, coupling, link or the like by which optical signals carried by one optical system element are imparted to the “communicating” element. Such “optically communicating” devices are not necessarily directly connected to one another and may be separated by intermediate optical components or devices. Likewise, the expressions “connection” and “operative connection” as used herein are relative terms and do not require a direct physical connection.  
         [0022]     Clos switches as depicted in  FIG. 1  may be grouped together to form large switching devices for routing signals for large metropolitan areas. These switching devices may work at optical wavelengths and/or sub wavelength levels (e.g., STS-1; however, embodiments of the invention are not limited to SONET or the STS-1 framesize, and may be compatible with other networking standards, such as, for example, SDH (Synchronous Digital Hierarchy) which in turn may utilize STM frames), and form the core optical switch for a nationwide or global networks.  
         [0023]      FIG. 2  depicts a top level diagram showing switching equipment  200 , consistent with the embodiments of the present invention. Switching equipment  200  may include a single chassis having a number of connected shelves,  221 ,  231 ,  241 , which may accept line cards having Line Modules (LMs)  220 , Switch Modules (SMs)  230 , and Line Modules (LMs)  240 , respectively. Alternatively switching equipment  200  may include a plurality of chassis and/or sub chassis.  
         [0024]     Each set of LMs  220  and  240  may be operatively connected to a network, typically through a fiber optic cable, to send and receive data traffic. Data shared between any LMs, regardless of location, flows through SMs  230  over a backplane  250 . In one embodiment, there may be 32 slots for LMs  220  and LMs  240 , each of which may support 80 Gigabits/sec of data traffic, entering the system from several links, such as optical cables operatively coupled to the LMs. As used herein, a backplane may be a physical surface providing interconnections between electrical and/or optical circuits and subsystems coupled thereto. While the description for  FIG. 2  above only describes the use of one backplane, one of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate that utilizing a plurality of backplanes (connected via optical or electrical cabling) may be consistent with embodiments of the invention.  
         [0025]     According to principles consistent with embodiments of the invention, the switching fabric in switching equipment  200  may, in general, be implemented as multiple, parallel switching networks having an overlapping structure. As used herein, the term “overlap” may refer to a switching fabric supporting any number of different logical models, each having different attributes, while utilizing common hardware in an efficient manner. A fuller understanding of the term “overlap” as it is used herein will be gained by a complete reading of this invention description.  
         [0026]     For example, an embodiment of the invention may have an overlapping switching fabric which supports two different logical models. One model may operate in a high bandwidth mode, and the other model operates in a low bandwidth mode. The high bandwidth model may support the maximum number of LMs at full capacity. The low bandwidth model may support a smaller number of LMs at full capacity with less common equipment. The low bandwidth model may add approximately 10% to the total system resources (e.g., the backplane traces and switching chips), but reuses many of the resources in the high bandwidth model. This reuse, or overlapping use of resources allows the low-bandwidth mode with minimal additional system cost and complexity.  
         [0027]     With reference to  FIG. 2 , the switching fabric in switching equipment  200  may be implemented as two, parallel switching networks which may overlap each other. The first switching network, having a lower aggregate bandwidth, may support a smaller number of input/output LMs (and hence a smaller number of ports) and may also have a smaller number of center stage switches. The second switching network may have a higher aggregate bandwidth and can support the full complement of LMs and a full complement of center stage switches. The lower bandwidth switching network would reduce the cost of switch  200  given the reduction of common hardware components. Moreover, by utilizing common hardware components for two different modes of operation, both the initial cost of an entire network and ongoing maintenance costs may be reduced.  
         [0028]     Another advantage to embodiments of the invention is that both low and high bandwidth modes may be realized in same set of chassis of switching equipment  200 . The low bandwidth mode can be easily upgraded to the high bandwidth mode by adding more common hardware to switching equipment  200  and changing a logical software model of which configures the switch fabric of switching equipment  200 .  
         [0029]      FIG. 3  shows an exemplary logical diagram of a generic Clos switch consistent with embodiments of the invention. Generic switch  300  shows both Clos switches associated with both low and high bandwidth operation, and is presented for comparison with standard Clos switch shown in  FIG. 1 . It is important to note that  FIG. 3  only shows one embodiment of the invention which has two overlapping switches providing two modes of operation, one mode having low bandwidth communication and one mode having high bandwidth communication. Note that this invention is not limited to supporting two modes of operation (e.g. low and high bandwidth modes)—it is entirely consistent with this invention to design a system which supports several different modes of operation.  
         [0030]     Generic switch  300  looks similar to traditional Clos switch  100  shown in  FIG. 1 , with the exception of an additional two groups of logical links (n 2 ),  315   a  and  315   b , depicted with dashed lines. However, in general, if multiple overlapping Clos switches are used to provide multiple modes of operation, there may be a corresponding increase in the number of additional groups of logical links (n 2 , n 3 , n 4  . . . ), wherein this number corresponds directly to the number of modes.  
         [0031]     Further referring to  FIG. 3 , a first set of LMs  310 , are denoted #(1−X), may be connected to SMs  330 , denoted SM #(1−W) via additional n 2  logical links  315   a  and  315   b . n 1  logical links  312   a  and  312   b , configured as shown in  FIG. 3 , remain essentially the same as in traditional Clos switch  100  shown in  FIG. 1 . A primary functional difference between traditional Clos switch  100  and generic Clos switch  300  may be the addition of n 2  logical link  315   a  between LMs  310  and SMs  330  and n 2  logical link  315   b  between SMs  330  and LMs  350 . These extra n 2  logical links  315   a  and  315   b  may not be used in all cases, but only for low-bandwidth operation. Additionally, n 2  logical links  315   a  and  315   b  enable this new functional model, that is, it allows the switch to look like one of two different models of the switch depending on how many SMs  330  and  340  are used and how many LMs  310 ,  320 ,  350 ,  360  are used.  
         [0032]     As described above for  FIG. 1 , one of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate that the separate line modules shown in  FIG. 3  are not necessarily physically distinct devices, and distinct modules are shown merely as a function of their logical operation. The distinct functionally performed by ingress LMs  310  and  320 , and egress LMs  350  and  360 , may be realized on the same line module (i.e., on a single piece of hardware) configured to operate in each mode, depending on the direction of the flow of data. Therefore, LM  310  may be the same module as LM  350 , and LM  320  and LM  360  may also be linked.  
         [0033]      FIG. 4  shows a logical diagram of the Clos switch used for low-bandwidth operation consistent with embodiments of the invention. Low bandwidth Clos switch  400  may only accept ingress data into first set of ingress LMs  310 . Data traffic may then be provided from LMs  310  to a first set of SMs  330  over logical links n 1  and n 2 . Data may subsequently be passed from SMs  330 , over logical links n 1  and n 2 , to egress LMs  350 , and ultimately the egress traffic may be passed outside switch  400 . Ingress LMs  320 , SMs  340 , and egress LMs  360  may not be used in the low bandwidth mode, and are thus shown in  FIG. 4  with shading. This mode allows switching equipment  200  to operate with a smaller number of switch modules and line modules while utilizing common hardware with switches operating in the higher bandwidth mode. Under smaller loads, switch configuration  400  enables operation using a smaller number of switch modules (SMs), W in this case, at a higher capacity with a smaller number of LMs (up to X in this case), thus permitting a lower cost per port for initial (low bandwidth) deployments.  
         [0034]      FIG. 5  shows a logical diagram of the Clos switch used for high-bandwidth operation consistent with embodiments of the invention. High-bandwidth Clos switch  500  may accept ingress data into first set of ingress LMs  310  and second set of ingress LMs  320 . Data traffic may then be provided from ingress LMs  310  and  320  to both first set of SMs  330  and a second set of SMs  340  over logical links n 1 . Data may then be transferred from SMs  330  and  340  to a first set of egress LMs  350  and a second set of egress LMs  360 , and ultimately, may then be transferred outside switch  500  as egress traffic. It should be understood that for this operational mode, logical links n 2  may not be configured to carry traffic in high bandwidth mode. When changing operation from the low bandwidth mode to the high bandwidth mode, data traffic may be rolled off logical links n 2  onto logical links n 1 .  
         [0035]      FIG. 6  shows another exemplary implementation of a generic Clos switch consistent with an embodiment of the invention. Clos switch  600  is a generic diagram showing both low and high bandwidth modes of operation. This diagram depicts the types and interconnects of switches in all of the LMs and SMs. A first set of ingress LMs  610 , and a first set of egress LMs  650 , may each have 8 individual LMs having a bandwidth of 80 Gbps each. Each line module in LMs  610  and  650  contain two switch chips, each having 52 inputs and 52 outputs. Note that these chips have two modes of operation—one mode as an ingress chip, and one mode as an egress chip. This implies that each chip uses 36+16 inputs and 16+36 outputs, for a total size of 52 inputs and 52 outputs. These chips may be, for example, the PMC Nx160 which are made by PMC Sierra. A second set of ingress LMs  620 , and second set of egress LMs  660 , may each have 24 individual LMs each having a bandwidth of 80 Gbps. Each line module in LMs  620  and  650  contain two switch chips, each having 52 inputs and 52 outputs. These chips may be the same as the chips used in LMs  610  and  620 . A first set of SMs  630  and a second set of SMs  640 , each may have 4 SMs, and each SM may have 4 chip switches, 3 of which have 64 inputs and 64 outputs, and 1 having 48 inputs and 48 outputs. These chips are also PMC Nx160 chips made by PMC Sierra. Each switch module in SMs  630  and  640  has 600 Gbps of bandwidth.  
         [0036]     Further referring to  FIG. 6 , in low bandwidth mode, only the first ingress LMs  610 , first SMs  630 , and first egress LMs  650  are utilized. The dotted lines are used in this mode from LMs  610  to SMs  630 . Therefore chips having the connectivity of the dotted lines from those switch chips with LMs  610  to the SMs  630  may only be utilized in 4 of the switch modules slots that support the connectivity across the back plane. The other four SMs ( 5 - 8 ) do not require that connectivity, although it is possible to use the same equipment in those slots. In this embodiment, the logical links fan out so there are three links that pass from each line module to each switch module. At the SMs  630 , the interconnects have been drawn so that each one connection at that point can be seen, so there is one connection from each ingress switch to each center switch, which fans out from there. This explains why n 1  equals 1 at that point, because each center switch chip has one connection to each ingress switch. In the low bandwidth mode, only line modules in slots  1  up to  8  may be populated as indicated by LMs  610 . In the first set of SMs  630 , all four switch modules could be used, with the 48×48 switch connected by the n 2  logical links as indicated by the dotted lines. In the full capacity mode, the logical links represented by the dotted lines may not be used, therefore switch modules  1 - 8  and line modules  1  up to  32  may be used. Additionally, second set of SMs  640  could be added to the circuit.  
         [0037]      FIG. 6A  shows yet another exemplary implementation of a generic Clos switch consistent with an embodiment of the invention. This embodiment may utilize larger switch chips in the line modules and switch modules for each mode of operation. Each module in the switch may utilize a soon-to-be-available Vitesse VC9195 switch chip, having a larger switching capacity (up to 128 inputs and 128 outputs @ 2.5G per chip). Because the same type of switch chip may be used in all of the line and switch modules, this embodiment enables reuse of the same switch chips for the low bandwidth mode, instead of using a different switch chip as shown in the previous embodiment. The larger switch chip allows the ingress and egress switching function to be performed with a chip enclosed in a single package.  
         [0038]      FIG. 7  shows switch fabric being reconfigured by a controller module consistent with embodiments of the invention. A card  710  in switch  700  may control the switch chips residing in the LMs and the SMs. When traffic needs to change and the traffic patterns to the switch need to change, a controller module  710  may change the connections across the different stages. When going from the low to high bandwidth mode, extra switch modules may simply be added, that is, the extra #((W+1) to Z) SMs  340 . A new fabric configuration may be download which rolls traffic from the n 2  logical links to the new n 1  logical links, as indicated by the bold arrow in  FIG. 7 . This allows an upgrade path which provides the ability to change operational modes of the switch while minimizing the affecting on existing traffic. Once the controller  710  initiates mode change, the n 2  logical links are no longer used and the switch operates in high bandwidth mode.  
         [0039]      FIG. 8  shows interconnections on an exemplary backplane consistent with embodiments of the invention. Switch  200  may be implemented utilizing a single backplane  250  to support three shelves of hardware contained in chassis  230 . Shelves  840  and  860  may support LMs, and shelf  850  may support SMs. Shelf  840  and  860  each may support x/2 of the “low bandwidth” LM slots to ease backplane routing restrictions. The full backplane connectivity is not shown in this diagram. Instead, LM  810  connects via n 1  links (depicted using a solid line) to each SM, and via n 2  links (depicted using a dotted line) to the first w SMs (similarly, LM  830  in shelf  860  may have the same connectivity). Each of the first w SMs in turn (e.g. SM  820 ) connects to each LM in both shelves via n 1  (solid) links and to the first x LMs via n 2  (dotted) links. Note that each line on the diagram represents a bidirectional link that carries both ingress and egress traffic.  
         [0040]      FIG. 9  depicts a software-based signal flow chart consistent with an exemplary embodiment of the invention. A system can be upgraded from low bandwidth mode to high bandwidth mode as the bandwidth needs of the network node increase. The procedure for this may be relatively simple. The system starts in the low-bandwidth mode state. (Step  910 ) The operator may then add the new common equipment (SM&#39;s to slots #((w+1) through z). (Step  915 ) The equipment management software may then qualify the modules to make sure they are fully operational and inform the switch controller software of their availability. (Step  920 ) When all the new hardware has been added, the operator may manually give the command to upgrade the software model from the low bandwidth to the high bandwidth model of the switch. (Step  925 ) After this command is received by the switch controller  710 , the switch controller software may automatically calculate a new switch configuration to route all traffic previously traversing the switch on n 2  links onto the hitherto unused n 1  links to SMs #((w+1) through z). (Step  930 ) Finally, the switch controller software will autonomously switch the internal switch model to the high bandwidth model. (Step  935 ) This may consist of passing the parameters C (number of center stage switches, previously w*(#chips per SM in low bandwidth mode), now z*(#chips per SM in high bandwidth mode)) and N (number of links to each switch) to the switch controller, so that it can perform its calculation. The switch controller may also be informed that LMs in slots (x+1) to z can be used to carry traffic. From this point further, the switch controller will no longer use the n 2  links to route traffic through the fabric now that it is in high bandwidth mode.  
         [0041]     Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims.

Technology Category: h