Patent Document

CLAIM OF PRIORITY 
     Priority is claimed based on U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/209,040 filed Jun. 2, 2000. 
    
    
     STATEMENT OF INVENTORSHIP 
     Assignee Holland Company believes that the subject matter disclosed in  FIG. 2  was the sole invention of Richard L. Thelen. Assignee Holland Company believes the subject matter in  FIG. 3  was co-invented by Richard L. Thelen, James Mumaw of Lincoln Electric Company and Steve Sulc of Fanuc Robotics North America. That portion of  FIG. 4  not specified as sole invention of Richard L. Thelen or co-invented by Richard L. Thelen, James Mumaw of Lincoln Electric Company and Steve Sulc of Fanuc Robotics North America was not invented by Richard L. Thelen and no rights therein will be claimed. These disclosures are made to comply with section 112 of 35 U.S.C. § 112. 
     GAP WELDING PROCESS 
     This proposed method and operation would electronically determine the location, orientation and size of the gap between two pieces that are to be welded together relative to the robotic welder&#39;s own coordinates. The gap welding process would adjust the predetermined welding coordinates to conform to the gap as presented, set the spatial association between the welder and the gap and then produce a sound weld. 
     BACKGROUND 
     During gas shielded arc welding of steel railroad rails in the field, difficulties have arisen in the past when the welding of gaps were reliant on the operators ability to position the pieces of rail to within the specified weld gap limitations. As in the case of on-site welding of large essentially immovable objects, positioning pieces of welding equipment to within the weld gap limitations can be very difficult or impossible to accomplish. Typically, robotic gas shielded arc welding has been very effective when welding is performed under controlled conditions, such as in a test laboratory, and the item to be welded can be brought to the stationary robotic welder and positioned to produce a weld gap that is within tolerance. On-site welding of large essentially immovable objects utilizing gas shielded arc welding has been ineffective until this point because of (1) the difficulties in positioning an easily transportable robotic arc welding device precisely with respect to the gap between two pieces to be welded when the pieces are stationary and repositioning is virtually impossible, (2) positioning the pieces to be welded precisely with respect to each other to define the weld gap to be welded by a nominal weld program is difficult and (3) the inability to accurately cut the faces of the pieces to be welded so that the geometrical planes created by the faces, that define the gap, are parallel to each other. 
     It was desirable to design a system that can sense the location and size of the gap between two pieces to be welded and automatically orient the gas arc welder to the proper location with respect to the gap to perform the welding function. It was also desirable to instantaneously gather information during the welding process to adjust data to allow the weld program to adapt to the weld gap. It was desirable to store the weld program data in a format that allows for easy manipulation of this data during the welding process. When automation is added, it is possible to properly align and modify the weld coordinates so a sound and accurate weld can be produced between two pieces. 
     SUMMARY OF INVENTION 
     The present invention provides a gap welding process that determines the location, orientation and shape of the gap between two pieces to be welded and then uses that information, along with data stored in spreadsheet format and feedback data to gas shield arc weld the gap. The preferred welding method is gas shield arc welding but electroslag welding may also be substituted into the gap welding process. The invention has three processes, the gap sensing process, the data transfer process and the robotic welding process which work simultaneously to produce a complete and accurate weld despite variations in the size and position of the weld gap. 
     The gap sensing process is designed to accurately measure the location and size of the gap to be welded and save the acquired information to allow the robotic control program to modify the program data. The gap sensing process utilizes a High Level Programming Language program to maneuver the robotic welder to touch specific locations on the faces and edges of the pieces forming the weld gap or ancillary fixturing to determine the weld gap&#39;s exact location, orientation and shape. 
     The data transfer process uses a data conversion program to (1) process welding data stored in files in a spreadsheet format, (2) convert the welding data into weld programming data and (3) make the weld program data available for use by the robotic control programs. The principle for the format of data stored in spreadsheet is relative to each of the user frames and alternation of the user frames as the welding process continues. The stored welding data includes, but is not limited to, point position, user frame to be used, weld schedule, seam tracking schedule, weave schedule, azimuth orientation, travel speed, wait time, weave time and digital output control data. 
     The gap welding process allows for the use of data from the gap sensing process to orient the welding torch to the proper coordinates for welding of the gap. It is further designed to compare weld program data provided by the data transfer process to current welding parameters in the form of feedback data to make welding calculations. The welding program then uses these calculations to determine subsequent weld process operations. 
     The robotic welding process uses data that has been downloaded into the robotic control program from the data transfer process, in the form of weld program data, to properly position the torch during welding. The robotic control program is written in a “Higher Level Programming Language”. Data used by the robotic control program includes feedback data, weld variance data and weld program data. Feedback data are readings taken during the weld cycle of real time welding conditions. 
     With the gap sensing, data transfer, and robotic welding processes working together, the gap welding process can produce a complete and accurate weld despite variations in the location, orientation and shape of the weld gap. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         FIG. 1   a  is a table showing an overview of the steps in the gap welding process. 
         FIG. 1   b  is a flow diagram displaying an overview of the gap welding process. 
         FIG. 2  is a flow diagram of the data download process with an expanded description of the properties of the data conversion program. 
         FIG. 3  is a flow diagram of the gap sensing process. 
         FIG. 4  is a flow diagram of the gap welding process incorporating weld program data, weld variance data and welding feedback data. 
         FIG. 5  is an elevational drawing of the robotic welder at the weld gap. 
         FIG. 6  is a top plan view of the weld gap. 
         FIG. 7  is a perspective view of the weld gap. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     Several welding processes which have proven satisfactory in laboratory testing are unable to perform adequate welds in the field, as those taught in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,773,779 and 5,877,468 which are incorporated by reference, because of a lack of adjustment and adaptability as provided by this gap welding process. It should also be understood that the invention here is applicable to robotic welding of any workpiece which is substantially immovable, however the principles are described with particular reference to rail welding. The prior art robotic calibration problem is a result of applying the typical method of robotic control such as one used in a manufacturing assembly line where work pieces are brought to a fixed welder. When the typical method of robotic control is used, which is one where the robotic welder is in a fixed location, the operator manually positions the robotic welder and pieces to be welded so the proper gap size is created. Once the pieces are properly positioned, fixed stops are used so subsequent pieces to be welded can be positioned in the exact location as the original. When using a fixed robotic welder, pieces to be welded have identical weld face orientation which is accomplished by the use of precise cutting methods and the ability of the operator to manually position the pieces so that the faces to be welded are parallel to each other. 
     When the robotic welder  30  is brought out into the field, each weld gap  32  encountered is unique from the next. To perform a weld, the robotic welder  30  needs to be moved to the next gap location and realigned. Due to the immovable nature of the weld pieces, the gap welding process  10  must sense the location, orientation and origin position of the faces of the pieces that define the gap and make adjustments to weld coordinate data so it can accurately and completely fill in the weld gap  32 . 
     A preferred embodiment of the gap welding process  10  of the present invention is shown in the flow diagram of  FIG. 1 . The gap welding process  10  includes three processes that are needed to accurately and completely fill the weld gap  32  between two pieces  51  to be welded. The three processes include the data transfer process  12 , the gap sensing process  14 , and the robotic welding process  16 . It will be understood that the problems are not necessarily unique to rail welding, as other on—site welds, such as in architectural construction, or ship-building, to name some examples, could also benefit from the teachings herein. 
     The gap welding process  10 , which is made up of these several robotic control and sensing processes, is capable of welding a gap between two pieces of metal with variations in gap location, orientation and position. The advantages of the gap welding process  10  is the ability to locate the boundaries of the weld gap so the robotic control program  24  can continuously move the gas arc welding torch through the gap between the two pieces to be welded to properly produce a sound and accurate weld. 
     The gap welding process  10  is initiated with the transfer of weld data, which is performed by the data transfer process  12 . The data transfer process  12 , best shown in the flow diagram of  FIG. 2 , allows predetermined welding position data which is stored as spreadsheet data  18  to be converted into weld program data  22  by the data conversion program  20 . The spreadsheet data  18  are stored information needed to instruct the robotic welder  30 . The operator has the option of choosing a preselected group of spreadsheets or can create a customized group by selecting individual spreadsheet data  18 . Other spreadsheet data can be substituted depending on the dimensions of the pieces to be welded. Once selected, the spreadsheet data  18  is converted by the data conversion program  20  to the weld program data  22  that can be used to position the robotic welder  30 . The weld program data  22  contains variables in the X-Y-Z − -W-P-R coordinate system that allows for three dimensional positioning and rotation of the robotic welder  30 . The stored weld program data  22  also includes, but is not limited to, point position, user frame to be used, weld schedule, seam tracking schedule, weave schedule, azimuth orientation, travel speed, weave time and digital output control data. The data transfer process  12  allows for instantaneous transfer of weld program data  22  needed by the robotic control program  24  to perform a complete weld. The robotic control program can easily and automatically manipulate information stored in the weld program data. The data conversion program  20  is a Higher Level Programming Language program, which transfers the weld program data  22  into a program data memory location within a robotic control program  24 . The weld program data  22  provides detailed information so the robotic control program  24  can accurately maneuver the robotic welder  30  in the weld gap  32  relative to the user frames that will be defined in the gap sensing process. The spreadsheet data  18  can be created or altered depending upon the object to be welded. Spreadsheets can be selected by the operator, as needed depending on the complexity or simplicity of the weld subject matter. The data transfer process  12  does not provides enough information for the robotic control program  24  to manipulate within a gap, additional physical data is required so the robotic control program  24  can conform to a specific weld gap  32 . The process that provides the physical data is the gap sensing process  14 . 
     The gap sensing process  14 , best shown in the flow diagram of  FIG. 3 , is designed to accurately measure the location, orientation and position of the gap  32  to be welded and store the acquired information as weld variance data  26  to be used by the robotic control program  24 . Weld variance data  26  is made up of user frames  34  and offsets  36 . User frames  36  are stored weld gap  32  data for the different weld face configurations. One geometrical plane of the User frames  36 , determined by gap sensing, is formed by the face of the piece to be welded in relation to the coordinate position of the robotic welder  30 . Offsets  36  are the measurements of the differences in actual dimension from the nominal dimension caused by manufacturing wear or handling, determined by the gap-sensing program  28  and used to make adjustments to weld program data. The gap sensing process  14  utilizes a gap sensing program  28  which is a “High Level Programming Language” program to maneuver the robotic welder  30  to touch the pieces to be welded which form the weld gap  32 , to determine user frames  3  and  4  and offsets  36 . The gap-sensing program  28  determines user frames to define the boundaries of the gap  32  to be welded. The gap sensing process  14 , as shown in  FIG. 4 , is initiated by placing the robotic welder  38  to within ¼ inch spherical proximity of a location  50  that has a relationship to the gap  32  formed by the pieces to be welded. It will be readily observed that  FIGS. 5 ,  6  and  7  do not show this gap  32  to scale, being exaggerated for clarity. This orientation and location of the robot with respect to the gap  32  formed by the pieces to be welded is arbitrarily designated as User Frame  1 . User Frame  1  is a relatively gross orientation and location between the robot and the gap to be welded and is used as the coordinate system for the start of the gap sensing process. 
     The arbitrary first user frame to be determined by the gap sensing program  28  is the geometrical face  52  of the piece to be welded, best shown in  FIG. 7 , which is closest to the robotic welder  30  and is arbitrarily designated as user frame  4 . To determine the geometrical plane of user frame  4 , and to determine orientation of the gap face within the plane, the gap sensing program  28  maneuvers the robotic welder  30  so the torch tip and/or weld wire  38  contacts the face  52  of the piece to be welded or the fixturing at several locations. The points of contact typically include the two bottom corner points  54  and  56  of the face, the top center point  58  along with other points, but many point combinations may be incorporated. The torch tip and/or weld wire  38  is electrically charged so when it comes into contact with the piece to be welded or fixturing, which is grounded, a circuit is completed. The gap-sensing program  28  senses the presence of a completed circuit and stops the robotic welder  30  and records its position in the X-Y-Z coordinate system. Once contact takes place, the robotic weld&#39;s  30  position is recorded and moved to the next location on the face until all needed points are gathered to determine user frame  4 . 
     After collecting the points that make up user frame  4 , the robotic welder  30  is instructed by the gap sensing program  28  to determine the next user frame. This is the face that opposes user frame  4  and is arbitrarily designated as user frame  3 . To determine the geometrical plane of user frame  3 , and to determine orientation of the gap face within that plane, the gap sensing program  28  maneuvers the robotic welder  30  so the torch tip and/or welding wire  38  contacts the face  52  of the piece to be welded or fixturing at several locations. The points of contact typically include the two bottom corner points  65  and  66  of the face, the top center point  67  along with other points, but many point combinations may be incorporated. 
     The operation of using the gap sensing program  28  to determine the geometrical plane of a user frame and orientation of the face of the piece to be welded within that plane is repeated until all necessary user frames have been defined and oriented. 
     Once the data points are gathered for all user frames, the robotic control program  24  calculates an arbitrarily chosen user frame  2 , which is an imaginary geometrical plane which has a certain orientation to previously determined user frames. User frame  2  gives the robotic control program  24  a plane of reference when performing welding functions that are not oriented to a gap face. After gathering the necessary user frame data, the robotic control program  24  determines the gap offsets  36  of the pieces to be welded by positioning the torch tip and/or welding wire  38  to touch the outside  60 , inside  62  and top  64  of the pieces to be welded to determine if any parts of the piece are offset in the X-Y-Z direction from the expected coordinates as represented in the weld program data  22 . Offset determination is a crucial step in the gap welding process  10  because the weld program data  22  only provides the robotic control program  24  with the welding data for ideal weld gap conditions and does not compensate for dimensional variations in the pieces to be welded. When on-site welding, it is not uncommon to encounter material to be welded that has been deformed due to wear or other elemental factors such as manufacturing defects or damage due to improper handling. Offsets  36  as well as user frames are needed so the robotic control program  24  can vary the weld program data  22  to accurately conform to the weld gap  32 . Weld variance data  26 , which encompasses the user frames and offsets is used by the robotic control program  24  to determine whether the weld gap is within the allowable welding tolerance. If the weld gap  32  is larger or smaller than the acceptable tolerance limits, the robotic control program  24  will abort and no weld will be made. 
     The variance data allows the gap welding process  10  to be adapted to each individual weld gap  32 . The gap sensing program  28 , which uses a Higher Level Programming Language, uses the data received by physically touching the pieces to be welded to initialize the weld variance data  26 . The initializing of the weld variance data  26  is when the gap sensing program  28  initializes the user frames to best fit the orientation of the weld gap  32 , faces  52  and edges  53  and sets the offsets  36  to be used in the robotic welding process  10 . 
     The robotic welding process  16 , as shown in the flow diagram in  FIG. 4 , features the robotic control program  24  which receives input data in the form of weld variance data  26 , weld program data  22  and feedback data  44 . The robotic control program  24  uses the input data to determine where to position the robotic welder  30 . The robotic control program  24  can manipulate the weld variance data  26  and the weld program data  22  based on information received from the real time feedback data  44  such as position and amperage. The manipulated data may be used by the robotic control program  24  to transmit computer instructions directly to the “Robotic Welding Control Software”  46  or due to differences in programming language, an instruction translation may be required. If a computer instruction translation is required to transform the High Level Programming Language instructions to Low Level Programming Language instruction, the robotic control program  24  can transmit the instructions to the Lower Level Welding Program  48  where the higher level welding program language instructions are converted into a format that can be understood by the Robotic Welding Control Software  46 . It has been determined that the programming language known as KAREL is a suitable programming language for the invention described herein. 
     The Lower Level Welding Program  48  first receives instructions from the robot control program  24  and then the Lower Level Welding Program  48  written in a Low Level Programming Language is used as an Instruction Translating Program. The converted instructions are then transmitted from the Lower Level Welding Program  48  to the robotic welding control software that instructs the robotic welder  30  to properly position the welding torch and perform the appropriate operations, which produce a sound and accurate weld in the weld gap  32 . 
     Various features of the invention have been particularly shown and described in connection with the illustrated embodiment of the invention, however, it must be understood that these particular arrangements merely illustrate, and that the invention is to be given its fullest interpretation.

Technology Category: 3