Patent Document

BACKGROUND 
       [0001]    1. Technical Field 
         [0002]    The present disclosure relates to multifunction devices, and in particular, to a system for authoring educational assessments for printing on multifunction devices. 
         [0003]    2. Description of Related Art 
         [0004]    In recent years the basic office copier has evolved into what can be called a “multi-function device” or MFD. With digital technology, a machine with the basic outward appearance of a traditional copier can perform additional functions such as printing documents submitted in digital form over a network; sending and receiving messages via facsimile; recording hard-copy original images in digital form and sending the resulting data over a network, such as in electronic mail; or recording hard-copy original images in digital form on a compact disc or equivalent medium. These additional functions present further challenges to a designer of a convenient and intuitive user interface. 
         [0005]    The present disclosure is directed utilizing MFDs to creating, grading, and analyzing the results of tests administered to students, and in particular, to a computer-implemented educational assessment system and method for generating and administering student assessments, evaluating the results thereof to enable educators to identify strengths and weaknesses of students both individually and in the aggregate, and tailoring the learning experience of students in a classroom environment. 
         [0006]    Classroom education historically has had a one-to-many structure wherein a lesson is presented by a teacher presents to a group of students. For example, a typical mid-19 th  century classroom might include group of students representing a broad range of age and intelligence. Most likely, one would find that all the children and teenagers in the community grouped together in a single classroom under the auspices of a single teacher. Accordingly, lesson plans were often broadly focused in order to accommodate the disparate needs of such a varied student populace, which as a result left the educational needs of some students unfulfilled, while leaving other students overwhelmed. 
         [0007]    The present disclosure relates to the process of assessing the attributes of a student or group of students at selected times during their learning process and particularly relates to the assessment and evaluation of student attributes or progress in a structured classroom where a teacher is required to educate the students to a level of proficiency in various subject matters and at particular grade levels. Typically, in a grade level classroom, the teacher periodically gives the students printed form assessments or tests, as they have previously been referred to, in order to obtain an indication of the student(s) level(s) of proficiency in the subject matter of immediate interest. 
         [0008]    Where a teacher is responsible for a class having a relatively large number of students, the teacher typically passes out to all students a common assessment form. The assessments are distributed to the students who then mark their responses on the forms which are then gathered by the teacher and individually reviewed and evaluated or graded by the teacher. The process has required the teacher to then manually enter an overall metric of each student&#39;s performance on the assessment into a record book or database. Typically the metric is a single total score or percentage of possible points. This process has thus been time consuming and often requires the teacher to spend considerable time outside of the classroom performing these functions. Furthermore, no detailed record is kept regarding how each student performed on each item within the assessment. Given the low resolution metric recorded for each assessment, the recorded results do not fully or meaningfully determine the state of learning of individual students who may be experiencing learning difficulties or are insufficiently prepared for particular elements of the assessment. For example, all students whose total score is 601100 on an assessment are most likely not making the same incorrect or correct answers, but it is not possible to differentiate their performance if only total scores are recorded. 
         [0009]    Thus, it has been desired to provide a way or means of automatically scoring and recording detailed assessment results for students in a relatively large class, thereby eliminating the need for manually scoring and entering the results of the evaluations in a record book or database, and eliminating the loss of critical data inherent in the practice of recording only total scores or percentages. 
       SUMMARY 
       [0010]    The present disclosure relates to multifunction devices, and in particular, to a system for authoring educational assessments for printing on multifunction devices. 
         [0011]    In one embodiment of the present disclosure, an assessment authoring system is implemented by an operative set of processor executable instructions configured for execution by at least one processor and includes a user interface and an assessment generation component. The system can further include a marketplace interface component adapted to communicate the assessment data structure with an electronic marketplace. The user interface communicates user input and the assessment generation component receives the user input from the user interface. The assessment generation component generates an assessment data structure for printing on a multifunction device. The printed assessment includes a marking region adapted to receive a human marking. The printed assessment may be adapted for image processing. 
         [0012]    The assessment data structure can further include a meta-datum adapted to associate the human marking within the marking region with a printed question. Additionally or alternatively, a meta-datum is included within assessment data structure and is adapted to indicate a collection type; the collection type being adapted to indicate an expected human marking of the human marking. The collection type is one of a multiple-choice collection type, a multiple-choice-sequential collection type, a fill-in-the-box collection type, a singles collection type, and/or a multiple-choice-survey collection type. 
         [0013]    In other embodiment of the present disclosure, the user input may be adapted to instruct the assessment authoring tool to generate question data such that the question data is adapted to instruct a multifunction device to print the question on the printed assessment. The user input may also be adapted to instruct the assessment authoring tool to generate a meta-datum indicating an answer corresponding to the human marking occurring in the marking region and/or the meta-datum can be further adapted to indicate a mark type, e.g., Indicates Error, Indicates Correct, Selects Result, Is Result, Survey Selection, and Connector. 
         [0014]    In another embodiment of the present disclosure, the user interface is adapted for user preview of the printed assessment including user preview of the marking regions. The marking region is selected via received user input from the user interface. 
         [0015]    In yet another embodiment of the present disclosure, a system for printing assessments on a multifunction device includes a user interface and an assessment generation component. The user interface is adapted to communicate user input. The assessment generation component is in operative communication with the user interface and is configured to receive the user input therefrom. The assessment generation component is adapted to generate an assessment data structure as at least a function of the user input. The assessment data structure includes printing data and meta-data. The printing data operatively instructs the multifunction device to print an assessment having at least one marking region adapted to receive at least one human marking. The printing data can include one or more of a page description language data structure, a portable document format data structure, a postscript data structure, a raw image, a compressed image, and/or a print job. 
         [0016]    The meta-data includes a meta-datum adapted to indicate an answer corresponding to a human marking of the at least one human marking occurring in a marking region of the at least one marking region. The meta-datum can indicate the answer is one of a correct answer and an incorrect answer as corresponding to the human marking of the at least one human marking occurring in the marking region of the at least one marking region. Additionally or alternatively, the assessment generation component may also generate the assessment data structure by modifying another assessment data structure (e.g., a stored assessment data structure). The assessment generation component can generate the assessment data structure such that the printing data includes a scanned image. Additionally or alternatively, the assessment generation component operatively utilizes an assessment data structure template to generate the assessment data structure. 
         [0017]    The meta-data can include at least one global meta-datum. The at least one global meta-datum includes at least one of a bar code field, a bar code print location, a variable print data pointer, a variable print data print location, a document name, a print characteristic, a registration mark and/or a registration mark print location. The at least one global meta-datum is adapted to instruct the multifunction device to print a print object within a print region of the printed assessment. 
         [0018]    In yet another embodiment of the present disclosure, the user interface is further adapted for user preview of the printed assessment including user preview of the at least one marking region. The user interface is further adapted for user selection of a second marking region of the at least one marking region utilizing the user preview of the at least one marking region and the system further comprises a meta-datum configuration component in operative communication with the user interface and adapted to receive user input therefrom. The meta-datum configuration component is adapted to configure a second meta-datum of the meta-data of the assessment data structure such that the second meta-datum is adapted for association with a second human marking of the at least one human markings within the selected second marking region of the at least one marking region. 
         [0019]    In yet another embodiment of the present disclosure, the printing data of the assessment data structure includes a question datum adapted to operatively instruct the multifunction device to print a question on the printed assessment. The question is associated with the human marking of the at least one human marking within the marking region of the at least one marking region. The meta-datum is adapted to indicate the answer as corresponding to the human marking such that the human marking is in response to the printed question. 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         [0020]    These and other advantages will become more apparent from the following detailed description of the various embodiments of the present disclosure with reference to the drawings wherein: 
           [0021]      FIG. 1  shows an illustration of an educational assessment system in accordance with the present disclosure; 
           [0022]      FIG. 2  shows an illustration of an education assessment system utilizing an authoring system for authoring educational assessments in accordance with the present disclosure; 
           [0023]      FIG. 3  shows a block diagram of a system for authoring education assessments as utilized by the education assessment system of  FIG. 2  in accordance with the present disclosure; and 
           [0024]      FIG. 4  shows a graphic of a user interface usable with the system of  FIG. 3  in accordance with the present disclosure. 
       
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
       [0025]    Referring to the drawings,  FIG. 1  shows an illustration of an educational assessment system  100  in accordance with the present disclosure. System  100  includes stages  102  through  112 . A teacher and/or school administrator may utilize system  100 . A teacher identifies herself to the MFD  114  during stage  102  by logging into system  100 . The teacher can log into system  100  utilizing any authentication and/or security technology. For example, the teacher (or authorized user) can log into system  100  using a unique ID, a username, an RFID tag, a smart card, a passphrase, and the like. Additionally or alternatively, the teacher logs into MDF  114  using a touch-screen display. Several assessments are presented to the teacher so that she can choose among them to print. The chosen assessments are then printed during stage  102 . At stage  104 , the teacher administers the assessments to one or more students. During stage  106 , the teacher scans in the assessments into MDF  114 . MDF  114  can convert the scanned assessment into a Page Description Language File, image data, and/or other format. MDF  114  and/or a server (not shown) may perform processing on the scanned assessments. During stage  108 , the assessments are evaluated, e.g., an algorithm (not depicted) grades the assessments using a rubric (not depicted). Stage  108  evaluates the assessment by reviewing the human markings. The teacher may be notified by the algorithm that the assessments have been evaluated, e.g., via email, text message, a printed page and the like. During stage  110 , the teacher can verify and/or correct how the assessments were graded using personal computer  116 . During stage  112 , the teacher requests reports about the assessment to design other assessments and/or to tailor the teaching of the students. Stages  110  and/or  112  may be repeated several times. In other embodiments, stages  102  through  110  may vary in sequence, some stages may be performed in a serial manner or a parallel manner, and/or some stages may be performed in a step-wise manner. 
         [0026]    Referring to the drawings,  FIG. 2  shows an illustration of an education assessment system  200  utilizing an authoring assessment authoring system  300  (discussed below) for authoring educational assessments. System  200  includes stages  202  through  210 . During stage  202 , a teacher uses an authoring assessment authoring system  300  (see  FIG. 3  and the discussion below) to create a ‘trial’ assessment and associated rubric, which is attached as meta-data for scoring and/or evaluation purposes. The teacher associates the use of this ‘trial’ assessment with a small (as small as one student) pseudo-class of students and also validates that pseudo-class as one of her classes, which will appear as a valid class when the teacher access the data via MFD  114  and/or personal computer  116 . 
         [0027]    During stage  204 , the teacher identifies herself on MFD  114 , e.g., by pressing a “MY MFD” button on the touch screen. The teacher may opt to print a trial assessment for a pseudo-class. The trial assessment may be utilized to determine if the assessment is sufficient and/or if modification needs to be made. The teacher thereafter verifies the appearance of the assessment, and if satisfied, can add ‘purposeful’ marks to the assessment to simulate assessing the pseudo-class. If the teacher is not satisfied with the printed assessment then the teacher may make modifications using MFD  114  and/or personal computer  116 ; thereafter the teacher may return to stage  202  again. During Stage  206 , the teacher scans in the marked assessments, e.g., by pressing the “MY MFD” button again on the touch screen display. During stage  208 , the assessment are evaluated and the teacher may be notified, e.g., by email, or other communications technology. As previously mentioned, MDF  114  can convert the scanned assessment into a Page Description Language File, image data, and/or other format. MDF  114  and/or a server (not shown) may perform processing on the scanned assessments. 
         [0028]    During stage  210 , the teacher can validate the scoring and/or the report generation. The report and scoring should correlate to the purposeful markings the teacher made. Modifications may be made during stage  210  and the teacher may return to one of the previous stages  202  through  208 . During stage  210 , she may interface into a server via personal computer  116  (or MFD  114  itself) and store the assessments as part of a database. 
         [0029]    Additionally or alternatively, the assessment may be uploaded into a digital marketplace, such as an e-commerce website in which the teacher (or her institution) may be compensated based upon other teacher&#39;s utilization of the assessment. Assessment data structure  310  may be shared with other teacher locally. 
         [0030]    Additionally or alternatively, assessment data structure  310  may be shared via a web service with other teachers, school, and/or school districts. The money collected may be paid to the teacher, her school, and/or her school district. Assessment data structure  310  may be sold per printed assessment, via a one-time license, and/or may have an extra charge for making changes and re-selling the assessment data structure  310 . Statistics may be kept regarding the marketplace of the marketplace provider. 
         [0031]    Referring to the drawings,  FIG. 3  shows a block diagram of an assessment authoring system  300  for authoring education assessment as utilized by the education assessment system  200  of  FIG. 2  in accordance with the present disclosure. Assessment authoring system  300  includes an assessment generation component  302 , a user interface  304 , and a marketplace interface component  306 . MFD  114  may be considered part of or separate from assessment authoring system  300 . Additionally or alternatively, assessment authoring system  300  may be implemented utilizing the hardware and/or software of MFD  114 . 
         [0032]    Assessment authoring system  300  may be implemented in hardware, software, software in execution, firmware, microcode, bytecode, in virtualization, in simulation, on a personal computer, and the like. For example, assessment authoring system  300  may be implemented in VHDL and/or by utilizing FPGA. Additionally or alternatively, assessment authoring system  300  may be an installable module installable in a xerographic apparatus. 
         [0033]    User interface  304  is in operative communication with assessment generation component  302 , and assessment generation component  302  is in operative communication with marketplace interface component  306 . The communications may be packet-based, virtual circuit based, and/or may utilize hardware or software. Additionally or alternatively, the communications may be through any sufficient physical or informational medium such as light, sound, ultrasonic vibrations, electric fields, electricity, data communications, TCP/IP, and the like. 
         [0034]    Assessment authoring system  300  receives user input  308  via user interface  304 . User interface  304  operatively communicates user input  308  with assessment generation component  302 . Assessment generation component  302  utilizes user input  308  and/or store  314  to generate assessment data structure  310 . Assessment data structure  310  is adapted for printing on MFD  114  such that printed assessment  312  is printed. 
         [0035]    User interface component  304  may be a graphical user interface, e.g., a “window” box in a LCD display as shown by a GUI based operating system. User interface  304  is adapted to show a preview of printed assessment  314  including a preview of marking regions  316 . Preview of printed assessment  312  may be approximated and/or estimated representation of a printed assessment. An assessment need not be printed for viewing of the preview of printed assessment  314 . 
         [0036]    Assessment generation component  302  is in operative communications with store  314 . Store  314  includes stored assessment data structure  320 , assessment data structure template  322 , and scanned image  324 . Store  314  may be a database (e.g., a SQL based database), and/or may be implemented in volatile or non-volatile memory, a magnetic storage medium, an optical storage medium, a cache, a heap, and the like. Stored assessment data structure  320  may be another assessment similar or identical to assessment data structure  310 . For example, stored assessment data structure  320  may be a digitally-compressed stored version of assessment data structure  310 . Assessment data structure template  322  may be a pre-made form to assist the user in authoring assessment data structure  310 . Scanned image  324  may be a scanned image scanned into system  300  via MFD  114 . 
         [0037]    Assessment generation component  302  includes meta-datum configuration component  326 . Meta-datum configuration component  326  allows a user to configure and/or generate some of (or all of) meta-data  328  of assessment data structure  310 . As previously mentioned, assessment generation component  302  generates assessment data structure  301 . Assessment data structure  310  includes printing data  330  and meta-data  328 . Printing data  330  may include one or more of PDL file  332 , PDF file  334 , raw image  338 , compressed image  340 , registration marks  342 , and question data  334 . Printing data  330  instructs MFD  114  to print printed assessment  312 . Question data  344  may be an image of a question and/or may include printing instructions to instruct MFD  114  to print questions  346 . 
         [0038]    Although the assessment data structure  310  is shown as having printing data  330  and meta-data  328 , it is contemplated in other embodiments that printing data and/or meta-data are separate; for example, meta-data  328  may include a pointer (not shown) such as a filename to indicate that the meta-data  328  is associated with the printing data  330 . 
         [0039]    Assessment data structure includes meta-data  328  including meta-datum  330 , meta-datum  348 , meta-datum  350 , global meta-data  352 , and meta-datum  354 . As previously mentioned, assessment data structure  310  is printed by MFD  114  as printed assessment  312 . Printing data  330  instructs MFD  114  to print printed assessment  312  including print regions  356  having print object  358  and question  346 . Additionally, printed assessment  312  includes marking regions  360  such that a human can (after being printed) make marking  362  and human marking  364 . 
         [0040]    Printing data  330  instructs MFD  114  to print printed assessment  312 . Printed assessment  312  includes print regions  356  where inks or toners may be marked on paper (e.g., text, objects, monotone objects, B&amp;W halftone object, color objects and the like). For example printed assessment  312  may be several pages of A 4  paper and print object  358  may be a school logo in the corner of a printed page. Question  346  is a student question marked on paper. Marking regions  360  are spaces or regions on printed assessment  312  in which a student (or teacher for diagnostic purposes) can make markings such as a human markings  362  and  364 . For example, question  346  may include the text “Place an X on the Dog” accompanied with several drawings of animals. The student can mark an “X” on one of the shown animals (not depicted) resulting in human marking  364 . Thereafter printed assessment  312  is scanned by MFD  114  for image processing. 
         [0041]    As mentioned supra, assessment data structure  310  includes meta-data  328  having meta-data  348 ,  350  and  354 , and global meta-data  352 . Meta-data  328  may be created before the printing of printed assessment, during the printing of printed assessment  312  and/or after image processing is performed of printed assessment  312  including image processing of marking regions  360 . 
         [0042]    Meta-datum  348  includes an answer corresponding to a human marking, e.g., human marking  364  may indicate that an “X” was drawn. Meta-datum indicates correct/incorrect status of a human marking, e.g., human marking  364  may have an “X” over the wrong animal or the correct animal. Meta-data  352  may include a bar code field to instruct MFD  114  to print a bar code, a bar code print location to instruct MFD  114  where to print a bar code, variable print data, a document name, a print characteristic, a registration mark and/or a registration mark print location. Meta-datum  354  includes a collection type such as of a multiple-choice collection type, a multiple-choice-sequential collection type, a fill-in-the-box collection type, a singles collection type, and a multiple-choice-survey collection type. The collections types may correspond to one or both of human markings  362  and/or  364 . The collection type may be utilized by MFD  114  in image processing and/or to generate meta-data  348  and/or  350 . 
         [0043]    Referring to  FIGS. 3 and 4  simultaneously,  FIG. 4  shows a graphic of a user interface  304  of system  300  usable with the authoring assessment system  300  in accordance with the present disclosure. User interface  304  is shown as a GUI interface. User interface  304  includes a window  400  having scanned image  402  of text including words  404 ,  406 , and  408 . Words  404 ,  406 , and  408  are selectable by User Interface  304 . The meta-data configuration component  326  (see  FIG. 3 ) is in operative communications with a user via GUI portion  410 . GUI portion  410  includes mark interpretation selector  412  and collection type selector  414  wherein scanned image  402  may be associated with assessment data structure  310  such that words  404 ,  406 , and  410  are marking regions  360  adapted for human markings. The words  404 ,  406 , and  408  may be considered as printed versions of question  346 . 
         [0044]    Each of words  404 ,  406 , and  406  may be selected as a multiple-choice collection type, a multiple-choice-sequential collection type, a fill-in-the-box collection type, a singles collection type, a multiple-choice-survey collection type, and connector collector type. The multiple-choice collection type is adapted so that a human marking can select a group of objects where one of them is the correct answer. The multiple-choice-sequential collection type is adapted so that a human marking can indicate from among words  404 ,  406 , and  408  a correct word in an in-line arrangement. A fill-in-the-box collection type is adapted so that a human marking can indicate an answer such as the answer to the question: “what is 2+2=?”. The fill-in-the-box collection type may be indicated by a “______” marking region to indicate the marking region to the student. 
         [0045]    A singles collection type is adapted so that a human marking can indicate which item on the page is selected, e.g., a teacher may give the student a flash card and the student is asked to repeat the letter, and the teacher may cross out a letter on a grading sheet to indicate a wrong answer. A multiple-choice-survey collection type is adapted so that a human marking can indicate an answer to a survey question not having a “correct”-“incorrect” dichotomy. 
         [0046]    A connector collector type is adapted so that a human marking can indicate an answer via drawn lines between matching pairs; for example, a list of the words “dog”, “cat” and “elephant” may be shown near three pictures showing each respective animal. The student can draw a “connector” (the human marking is the connector line) between the word and picture which the student selects as corresponding to the word. 
         [0047]    Human markings  362  and  364  may be defined as Indicates-Error indication type, Indicates-Correct indication type, Selects-Result indication type, Is-Result indication type, Survey-Selection indication type, and Connector indication type. Mark types are options that are selected by the user of the system for “teaching” the system how to interpret the marks. Indicates Correct and Indicates Error mark types are utilized by the teacher to instruct the system how to interpret certain marks to indicate if the mark is should be interpreted as a correct or incorrect response, respectively, such as when asking the student to recite a displayed word. The teacher may circle the word to indicate a correct response and “x” a word in indicate an incorrect response. Selects-Result is a mark type that is a result of a human marking that indicates the selected item from a multiple choice question. Each question would have several possible “items” that can be marked by the person taking the test. For example, in the following question the student has to make a mark through the correct word: “Harry got up early and [saw, went, ate] to eat breakfast.” You have three “items” there which can be selected. This is used to teach the system that if the second item is marked (Selects Result) then it&#39;s correct. Is Result mark type is used for fill in the bubble type where you are not marking the actual item but instead an item (maybe next to it like a bubble) that indicates which answer you are giving. Survey Selection mark type is like the multiple-choice mark type but where more than one item can be selected and/or there is not necessarily just one answer (or any answers) that is correct. A connector mark type is type of mark drawn between two items. For example, when a student is shown a row of pictures on one side of the page and a row of words on the other side of the page and the student has to dray lines (connectors) connecting the correct word and the picture pair. The connector pairs may correspond to an answer.

Technology Category: g