Patent Document

FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
     This invention relates generally to the field of set-top boxes for cable or satellite television systems. More particularly, this invention relates to a method and apparatus for improvement in network performance of set-top boxes. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     Television set-top boxes such as those used in conjunction with cable television and satellite television systems often include two modems. In the case of cable television set-top boxes, often a DOCSIS cable modem and an out-of-band (OOB) modem are provided. The DOCSIS modem commonly operates at speeds up to 42 MBPS, whereas the out-of-band modem operates at a much slower but more reliable speed of perhaps 1.5 MBPS. When using the slower out-of-band modem, it may take a substantial amount time to carry out large downloads of information. Also, under high noise conditions, the cable modem may suffer high error rates producing unreliable or slow communications. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention relates generally to set-top boxes. Objects, advantages and features of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the following detailed description of the invention. 
     In one embodiment of the present invention, a method and apparatus of enhancing communications in a set-top box having a high speed modem and a lower speed modem uses selection of one of the modems depending upon noise and speed considerations, to receive a response packet by selectively substituting the appropriate IP address as the source address in a request message. 
     A method of communication in a set-top box having a high speed modem and a comparatively lower speed modem consistent with embodiments of the present invention includes transmitting a first request from the lower speed modem, the request including an IP address for the lower speed modem as a source address; determining that a reply to the first request is greater in size than a threshold size; and transmitting a second request from the lower speed modem using an IP address of the high speed modem for the source address. 
     A method of communication in a set-top box having a high speed modem and a comparatively lower speed modem consistent with another embodiment of the invention includes: transmitting a first request from the lower speed modem, the request including an IP address for the lower speed modem as a source address; determining that a communication channel used by the lower speed modem is noisy; and transmitting a second request from the lower speed modem using an IP address of the high speed modem for the source address. 
     A method of communication in a set-top box having a high speed modem and a comparatively lower speed modem consistent with yet another embodiment of the invention includes: transmitting a first request from the high speed modem, the request including an IP address for the high speed modem as a source address; determining that a communication channel used by the high speed modem is noisy; and transmitting a second request from the high speed modem using an IP address of the lower speed modem for the source address. 
     Any or all of the above methods can be implemented in a programmed processor residing within a set-top box. Moreover, a storage medium can carry instructions to implement the above process in a programmed processor residing in a set-top box. Additionally, a computer program embodying instructions to carry out the above process can be transmitted over any suitable communication medium. 
     The above summaries are intended to illustrate exemplary embodiments of the invention, which will be best understood in conjunction with the detailed description to follow, and are not intended to limit the scope of the appended claims. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     The features of the invention believed to be novel are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The invention itself however, both as to organization and method of operation, together with objects and advantages thereof, may be best understood by reference to the following detailed description of the invention, which describes certain exemplary embodiments of the invention, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which: 
     FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a first potential communication problem encountered with set-top boxes. 
     FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a second potential communication problem encountered with set-top boxes. 
     FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a solution to the potential problem of FIG.  1 . 
     FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating a solution to the potential problem of FIG.  2 . 
     FIG. 5 is a flow chart of a process consistent with embodiments of the present invention. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     While this invention is susceptible of embodiment in many different forms, there is shown in the drawings and will herein be described in detail specific embodiments, with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an example of the principles of the invention and not intended to limit the invention to the specific embodiments shown and described. In the description below, like reference numerals are used to describe the same, similar or corresponding parts in the several views of the drawings. 
     Turning now to FIG. 1, a set-top box (STB)  100  is illustrated including a pair of modems suitable for communication using a cable television system. The first modem is a high speed modem and is referred to herein as a cable modem (CM)  104  which may conform to the ITU&#39;s DOCSIS (Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification) cable modem standard. Under this standard, currently the modem may operate at baud rates of up to 42 MBPS. However, this should not be considered limiting. A second, comparatively lower speed modem  108 , such as an out-of-band (OOB) modem  108  operates, in this embodiment, at up to approximately 1.5 MBPS, but this too should not be considered limiting. In relative terms, the present invention is applicable to set-top boxes and other systems using two modems wherein one can be considered high speed in relation to the other. Thus, for purposes of this document “high” speed means higher than the lower speed modem, and “lower” speed means lower than the high speed modem. The absolute speed differences are irrelevant. By way of one example, the relative speeds of the two modems can be, for example, at least a factor of two different, with the higher speed modem considered to fall within the meaning of the term “high speed modem” herein. Unfortunately, along with the higher speed, comes somewhat greater vulnerability to noise, so that the lower speed modem can typically communicate more reliably, albeit slower, than the higher speed modem. 
     Set-top box  100  communicates via modems  104  and  108  with a server  112  over a suitable electronic communication medium. In the case of a cable television system, the communication medium constitutes the cable system itself, however, in other communication environments, wireless and satellite communications, telephone lines and/or fiber optics can constitute one or more of the communication media used by one or more of the modems of the set-top box  100 . 
     Set-top box  100 , in the preferred embodiment, also includes a processor  118  implemented, for example, as a microprocessor or microcontroller. Set-top box  100  also includes memory and/or mass storage such as Random Access Memory (RAM), Read Only Memory (ROM), flash memory, hard disc storage, etc. designated as  124 . Memory  124  stores an operating system such as the Sony Aperios™ operating system as well as data and computer programs such as a browser and control programs for controlling operation of the set-top box  100  including modems  104  and  108 . Processor  118  communicates with other devices including modems  104  and  108  residing within the set-top box  100  via a communication bus  130  in a conventional manner. 
     FIG. 1, illustrates a problem that can occur in communication with server  112  using the OOB relatively lower speed modem  108 . In this example, when a request  140  is transmitted from the OOB modem  108 , it communicates using a protocol such as Internet Protocol (IP). In this protocol and similar ones, the request message includes a destination address  142  for the message&#39;s destination server  112 , a source address  146  informing the destination of the IP address of the source (in this case IP address B—the IP address of the OOB modem) and data  148  forming the actual request. Such requests might be for download of information or updates of software, etc. At the destination server  112 , the response or reply  150  is assembled and transmitted back to the set-top box  100 . In so doing, the destination server  112  uses the source address  146  as the destination address  152  for the response. The reply similarly uses the IP address of the server  112  as the source address  156  and includes data  158  forming the actual reply or response. These messages, both  140  and  150  are typically broken into many smaller packets having similar format for communication over the network. 
     The operation described above follows conventional IP communication protocol. A problem occurs when the response message is extremely large. For example, in this case, if the reply message is 80 MB in size, it will take at least approximately 53 seconds to receive under best conditions, and typically longer. 
     Another scenario is illustrated in FIG. 2, wherein the cable modem  104  initiates a request  240  to server  112 , and the response  250  is returned under high noise conditions. The request message  240 , in accord with Internet Protocol, includes the destination address  142  of the server  112  and the source address  246  of the cable modem (address A) along with data  148 . The reply message  250  uses the source address  246  as the destination address  252  along with the source address  156  of the server  112  and the data  158 . 
     Under high noise circumstances, errors generated by the noisy conditions in the downstream cable modem communication channel can cause the response message  250  to be garbled and filled with errors. Such errors necessitate retransmission of response packets slowing down the response and possibly rendering it unreliable or even useless. 
     The problem described in connection with FIG. 1 can be ameliorated using the technique illustrated in FIG.  3 . In this embodiment, upon determining that a request is likely to or will result in a large reply message  350 , the OOB modem  108 , operating under control of the programmed processor  118 , transmits the request  340  with the IP address of the higher speed cable modem as the source address at  346 . As a result, subsequent response messages  350  will use the source address  346  (A) of the cable modem  104  as the destination address  352 . Thus, when the response message is large enough, the response can be elicited to be received on the higher speed cable modem  104 . The processor  118  can determine that a message is “large” by examining the first packet received in the response from the server  112 . This packet will indicate how large the total response is. The size of the response can therefore be ascertained and compared with a threshold. If the size of the response exceeds the threshold, the response is deemed to be large. At this point, the Out-of-band modem  104  cancels the initial request and transmits request  340  substituting the cable modem&#39;s address as  346  for the source address. Thus, the server, in accordance with standard Internet protocol, will use the cable modem address as the destination address for response message  350 . Using this technique, the receipt of an 80 MB response can take place in as little as approximately 2 seconds. 
     The threshold used in the above process can be determined based upon the relative speeds of the two modems and perceived acceptable download time for larger files. Other techniques can also be used without limitation to establish a suitable threshold. 
     The problem described in conjunction with FIG. 2 can similarly be addressed using the scenario illustrated in FIG.  4 . In the scenario of FIG. 2, a noisy downstream channel delivering data to cable modem  104  is the source of the problem. To address this problem, a request packet  440  is transmitted from the cable modem  104  to server  112 . Request packet  440  includes the server&#39;s address as the destination address at  142 , but includes the OOB modem address B as the source address at  446 . Thus, when the response is generated at server  112 , response message  450  uses the IP address B of the out-of-band modem  108  at  452  as the destination IP address. In this manner, the noisy downstream channel of the cable modem is avoided in favor of the more reliable out-of-band channel. 
     The detection of a noisy channel can be accomplished under this scenario by examining reply packets being returned to the cable modem  104  as a result of a request. Alternatively, the presence of a noisy channel can be determined by examining recently received packets arriving at the cable modem  104 . Errors can be detected by examining IP check sums for errors or by examining the reply packets for MAC CRC errors. Upon detection of errors by virtue of examining reply packets for IP checksum for errors, or by examining the reply packets for MAC CRC errors, the channel can be deemed too noisy if the error rate exceeds a predetermined threshold error rate. The error threshold can be determined empirically based upon the relative speeds of the two modems and typical error rates encountered in practice, for example. Other techniques for establishing the threshold can also be used without limitation. 
     The processes described in conjunction with FIGS. 3 and 4 are described in greater detail in conjunction with FIG.  5 . FIG. 5 illustrates a process  500  starting at  502 . When a request is to be transmitted, the process first determines if the requests from the cable modem at  506 . If not, the request must be from the out-of-band modem. If the request is not from the cable modem at  506 , the process next determines if a large response is anticipated at  510 . If a large response is expected at  510 , the cable modem&#39;s IP address is used as the source address at  514 , and the request is transmitted to the server over the out-of-band channel at  524 . In the event a large response packet is not anticipated at  510 , the process determines at  518  if the out-of-band return channel is noisy. If so, control passes to  514  where the cable modem&#39;s IP address is used as the source address prior to transmission at  524  over the out-of-band channel. If the out-of-band channel is not noisy at  518 , the out-of-band modem&#39;s IP address is used as the source address at  528  and the request is transmitted at  524  to the server over the out-of-band channel. 
     In the event the request is from the cable modem at  506 , the process determines at  534  if the downstream channel for the cable modem is noisy. If not, the cable modem&#39;s IP address is used as the source address at  538  and the request is transmitted to the server over the cable modem at  546 . In the event the downstream channel is deemed noisy by exceeding a predetermined error threshold at  548 , the out-of-band modem&#39;s IP address is used as the source address at  548  prior to transmission of the request to the server  112  over the cable modem  104  at  546 . 
     In either case, control passes from  524  or  546  to  550  where, depending upon the source address (cable modem or out-of-band modem) the response is received either on the cable modem at  554  or the out-of-band modem at  558  before control returns to the start. 
     The program instructions for carrying out the process described are stored in the electronic storage medium  124  within the set-top box  100 . The program instructions can also be downloaded to the STB  100  as a software update via a suitable communication transport medium (e.g. the cable or a satellite link or telephone line link) in a known manner. 
     Those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention has been described in terms of exemplary embodiments based upon use of a programmed processor. However, the invention should not be so limited, since the present invention could be implemented using hardware component equivalents such as special purpose hardware and/or dedicated processors which are equivalents to the invention as described and claimed. Similarly, general purpose computers, microprocessor based computers, micro-controllers, optical computers, analog computers, dedicated processors and/or dedicated hard wired logic may be used to construct alternative equivalent embodiments of the present invention. 
     Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the program steps used to implement the embodiments described above can be implemented using disc storage as well as other forms of storage including Read Only Memory (ROM) devices, Random Access Memory (RAM) devices; optical storage elements, magnetic storage elements, magneto-optical storage elements, flash memory, core memory and/or other equivalent storage technologies without departing from the present invention. Such alternative storage devices should be considered equivalents. 
     Furthermore, the present invention is preferably implemented using a programmed processor executing programming instructions that are broadly described above in flow chart form as well as graphical depictions in FIGS. 3-4. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the processes described above can be implemented in any number of variations and in many suitable programming languages without departing from the present invention. For example, the order of certain operations carried out can often be varied, and additional operations can be added without departing from the invention. Error trapping can be added and/or enhanced and variations can be made in user interface and information presentation without departing from the present invention. Such variations are contemplated and considered equivalent. 
     While the invention has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications, permutations and variations will become apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing description. Accordingly, it is intended that the present invention embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations as fall within the scope of the appended claims.

Technology Category: 5