Patent Document

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
       [0001]     1. Field of the Invention  
         [0002]     The present invention relates to a method of monitoring the status of a plasma processing system and, more particularly, to a method and system for monitoring the status of a plasma processing system using a pressure control system.  
         [0003]     2. Description of Related Art  
         [0004]     The fabrication of integrated circuits (IC) in the semiconductor industry typically employs plasma to create and assist surface chemistry within a plasma processing system necessary to remove material from and deposit material to a substrate. In general, plasma is formed within the plasma processing system under vacuum conditions by heating electrons to energies sufficient to sustain ionizing collisions with a supplied process gas. Moreover, the heated electrons can have energy sufficient to sustain dissociative collisions, and therefore, a specific set of gases under predetermined conditions (e.g., chamber pressure, gas flow rate, etc.) are chosen to produce a population of charged species and chemically reactive species suitable to the particular process being performed within the chamber (e.g., etching processes where materials are removed from the substrate or deposition processes where materials are added to the substrate).  
         [0005]     The processes described above are sensitive to the conditions achieved within the plasma processing system and, in order to meet expected yields, precise control of these conditions is now required. For example, changes in these conditions due to either abrupt changes (or faults), or gradual changes require constant monitoring. Therefore, it is of increasing importance to detect fault conditions, determine whether the fault is real or erroneous, and determine if a service condition is present.  
       SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
       [0006]     One aspect of the invention is to reduce or eliminate any or all of the above-described problems.  
         [0007]     Another object of the invention is to provide a method and apparatus for monitoring the status of a plasma processing system.  
         [0008]     Another object of the invention is to provide a method and apparatus for monitoring the status of a plasma processing system using a pressure control system.  
         [0009]     Another object of the invention is to provide a method and apparatus for detecting at least one of a fault or an erroneous fault in a plasma processing system using a pressure control system.  
         [0010]     Another object of the invention is to provide a method and apparatus for determining a condition for cleaning a plasma processing system.  
         [0011]     According to yet another aspect of the invention, a method of determining a status for a plasma processing system is described, which includes executing a process in the plasma processing system, monitoring a pressure control system coupled to the plasma processing system and configured to control the pressure of the process in the plasma processing system, and determining at least one of a fault condition, an erroneous fault condition, or a service condition for the plasma processing system from the monitoring.  
         [0012]     According to yet another aspect of the invention, a plasma processing system is described that includes a process chamber, a plasma source coupled to the process chamber and configured to form a plasma in the process chamber, a substrate holder coupled to the process chamber and configured to support a substrate, a gas injection system coupled to the process chamber and configured to introduce a process gas, a pressure control system coupled to the process chamber and configured to control a pressure in the process chamber, and a controller coupled to the plasma processing system and configured to monitor the pressure control system and determine at least one of a fault condition, an erroneous fault condition, or a service condition for the plasma processing system from the monitoring.  
         [0013]     Other aspects of the invention will be made apparent by the description that follows and by the drawings appended hereto. 
     
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0014]     The drawings depict representative embodiments of the invention. Where appropriate, like reference numerals are relied upon to designate like features, in which:  
         [0015]      FIG. 1  is a simplified schematic diagram of a plasma processing system according to an embodiment of the invention;  
         [0016]      FIG. 2  is a schematic diagram of a plasma processing system according to another embodiment of the invention;  
         [0017]      FIG. 3  is a schematic diagram of a plasma processing system according to still another embodiment of the invention;  
         [0018]      FIG. 4  is a schematic diagram of a plasma processing system according to yet another embodiment of the invention;  
         [0019]      FIG. 5  is a schematic diagram of a plasma processing system according to a further embodiment of the invention;  
         [0020]      FIG. 6  presents an exemplary set of data representing a valve angle as a function of flow throughput; and  
         [0021]      FIG. 7  illustrates a method of monitoring a plasma processing system according to another embodiment of the invention. 
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS  
       [0022]     In the following description, to facilitate a thorough understanding of the invention and for purposes of explanation and not limitation, specific details are set forth, such as a particular geometry of the plasma processing system and various descriptions of the pressure control system. However, it should be understood that the invention may be practiced with other embodiments that depart from these specific details.  
         [0023]     Nonetheless, it should be appreciated that, contained within the description are features which, notwithstanding the inventive nature of the general concepts being explained, are also of an inventive nature.  
         [0024]     Referring now to  FIG. 1 , a plasma processing system is presented for performing an etching or deposition process. For example, as shown in  FIG. 1 , an exemplary plasma processing system  1  includes a plasma processing chamber  10 , a diagnostic system  12  coupled to the plasma processing chamber  10 , and a controller  14  coupled to the diagnostic system  12  and the plasma processing chamber  10 . Additionally, the plasma processing system  1  comprises a pressure control system  30  including a pumping system  32  and a valve  34 . The plasma processing system also includes a gas injection system  36 . In the embodiment illustrated, the gas injection system  36  is shown as a component separate from the pressure control system  30 . As would be appreciated by those skilled in the art, however, in one possible variant, the gas injection system  36  may be incorporated as a part of the pressure control system  30  without departing from the scope of the invention.  
         [0025]     The controller  14  is configured to execute a process recipe including an etching process. Additionally, the controller  14  is configured to receive at least one signal from the diagnostic system  12  and to post-process the at least one signal in order to accurately determine a status for the process, such as a pressure of the process. In the illustrated embodiment, the plasma processing system  1 , depicted in  FIG. 1 , utilizes a plasma for material processing. The plasma processing system  1  may include an etch chamber, or a deposition chamber in other contemplated variants of the invention.  
         [0026]     Additionally, the pressure control system  30  is configured to perform at least one of adjusting and controlling the pressure in the plasma processing system  1 , utilizing at least one of the pumping system  32  or the valve  34 . Furthermore, the gas injection system  36  is configured to introduce a process gas at a flow rate and to adjust or control the pressure in the plasma processing system  1  in combination with the pressure control system  30 .  
         [0027]     According to the embodiment depicted in  FIG. 2 , a plasma processing system  1   a  in accordance with the present invention may include the plasma processing chamber  10 , a substrate holder  20 , upon which a substrate  25  to be processed is affixed, and the pressure control system  30 . The substrate  25  may be, for example, a semiconductor substrate, a wafer or a liquid crystal display (LCD). The plasma processing chamber  10  may be, for example, configured to facilitate the generation of plasma in processing region  15  adjacent a surface of the substrate  25 . An ionizable gas or mixture of gases is introduced via the gas injection system  36  (such as a gas injection pipe, or gas injection showerhead) and the process pressure is adjusted using the pressure control system  30 . Plasma can be utilized to create materials specific to a pre-determined materials process, and/or to aid the removal of material from the exposed surfaces of the substrate  25 . The plasma processing system  1   a  may be configured to process 200 mm substrates, 300 mm substrates, or larger-sized substrates. In fact, it is contemplated that either (or both) of the plasma processing system  1 ,  1   a  may be configured to process substrates, wafers, or LCDs regardless of their size, as would be appreciated by those skilled in the art. Therefore, while aspects of the invention will be described in connection with the processing of a semiconductor substrate, the invention is not limited solely thereto.  
         [0028]     The substrate  25  can be, for example, affixed to the substrate holder  20  via an electrostatic clamping system. Furthermore, the substrate holder  20  may, for example, further include a cooling system including a re-circulating coolant flow that receives heat from the substrate holder  20  and transfers heat to a heat exchanger system (not shown), or when heating, transfers heat from the heat exchanger system. Moreover, gas can, for example, be delivered to the back-side of the substrate  25  via a backside gas system to improve the gas-gap thermal conductance between the substrate  25  and the substrate holder  20 . Such a system may be utilized when temperature control of the substrate is required at elevated or reduced temperatures. For example, the backside gas system may include a two-zone gas distribution system, wherein the helium gas gap pressure can be independently varied between the center and the edge of the substrate  25 . In other embodiments, heating/cooling elements, such as resistive heating elements, or thermo-electric heaters/coolers may be included in the substrate holder  20 , as well as the chamber wall of the plasma processing chamber  10 , and any other component within the plasma processing system  1   a.    
         [0029]     In the embodiment shown in  FIG. 2 , the substrate holder  20  may include an electrode through which RF power is coupled to the processing plasma in the process space  15 . For example, the substrate holder  20  may be electrically biased at a RF voltage via the transmission of RF power from a RF generator  40  through an impedance match network  50  to substrate holder  20 . The RF bias may serve to heat electrons to form and maintain a plasma. In this configuration, the system  1   a  may operate as a reactive ion etch (RIE) reactor, wherein the chamber  10  and an upper gas injection electrode serve as ground surfaces. A typical frequency for the RF bias may range from 0.1 MHz to 100 MHz. RF systems for plasma processing are well known to those skilled in the art.  
         [0030]     Alternately, RF power may be applied to the substrate holder electrode at multiple frequencies. Furthermore, the impedance match network  50  serves to improve the transfer of RF power to the plasma in the plasma processing chamber  10  by reducing the reflected power. Match network topologies (e.g., L-type, π-type, T-type, etc.) and automatic control methods are well known to those skilled in the art and are, therefore, not described further.  
         [0031]     The pressure control system  30  includes the pumping system  32  and the valve  34 . The pumping system  32  may include, for example, a turbo-molecular vacuum pump (TMP) capable of a pumping speed up to 10000 liters per second (and greater). The valve  34  may include, for example, a gate valve, a swing gate valve, or a butterfly valve. Furthermore, the diagnostic system  12 , including a device for monitoring chamber pressure, may be coupled to the plasma processing chamber  10 . The pressure measuring device may be, for example, a Type 628B Baratron absolute capacitance manometer commercially available from MKS Instruments, Inc. (Andover, Mass.).  
         [0032]     The controller  14  preferably includes a microprocessor, memory, and a digital I/O port capable of generating control voltages sufficient to communicate and activate inputs to the plasma processing system  1   a  as well as monitor outputs from the plasma processing system  1   a . Moreover, the controller  14  may be coupled to and may exchange information with the RF generator  40 , the impedance match network  50 , the gas injection system (not shown), the pressure control system  30 , the diagnostic system  12 , as well as the backside gas delivery system (not shown), the substrate/substrate holder temperature measurement system (not shown), and/or the electrostatic clamping system (not shown). For example, a program stored in the memory may be utilized to activate the inputs to the aforementioned components of the plasma processing system  1   a  according to a process recipe in order to perform an etching process. One example of the controller  14  is a DELL PRECISION WORKSTATION610™, available from Dell Corporation, Austin, Tex.  
         [0033]     The controller  14  may be locally located relative to the plasma processing system  1   a , or it may be remotely located relative to the plasma processing system  1   a . For example, the controller  14  may exchange data with the plasma processing system  1   a  using at least one of a direct connection, an intranet, the Internet and a wireless connection. The controller  14  may be coupled to an intranet at, for example, a customer site; (i.e., a device maker, etc.), or it may be coupled to an intranet at, for example, a vendor site (i.e., an equipment manufacturer). Additionally, for example, the controller  14  may be coupled to the Internet. Furthermore, another computer (i.e., controller, server, etc.) may access, for example, the controller  14  to exchange data via at least one of a direct connection, an intranet, and the Internet. As also would be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the controller  14  may exchange data with the plasma processing system  1   a  via a wireless connection.  
         [0034]     In the embodiment shown in  FIG. 3 , a plasma processing system  1   b  that may be used to implement the present invention may, for example, be similar to the embodiment of  FIG. 1  or  2  and further include either a stationary or a mechanically or electrically rotating magnetic field system  60 , in order to potentially increase plasma density and/or improve plasma processing uniformity, in addition to those components described with reference to  FIG. 1  and  FIG. 2 . Moreover, the controller  14  may be coupled to the magnetic field system  60  in order to regulate the speed of rotation and field strength. The design and implementation of a rotating magnetic field is well known to those skilled in the art.  
         [0035]     In the embodiment shown in  FIG. 4 , a plasma processing system  1   c  that may be used to implement the present invention may, for example, be similar to the embodiment of  FIG. 1  or  FIG. 2 , and may further include an upper electrode  70  to which RF power may be coupled from a RF generator  72  through an impedance match network  74 . A typical frequency for the application of RF power to the upper electrode  70  may range from 0.1 MHz to 200 MHz. Additionally, a typical frequency for the application of power to the lower electrode may range from 0.1 MHz to 100 MHz. Moreover, the controller  14  is coupled to RF generator  72  and the impedance match network  74  in order to control the application of RF power to the upper electrode  70 . The design and implementation of an upper electrode is well known to those skilled in the art.  
         [0036]     In the embodiment shown in  FIG. 5 , a plasma processing system  1   d  that may be used to implement the present invention may, for example, be similar to the embodiments of  FIGS. 1 and 2 , and may further include an inductive coil  80  to which RF power is coupled via a RF generator  82  through an impedance match network  84 . RF power is inductively coupled from the inductive coil  80  through dielectric window (not shown) to the plasma processing region  15 . A typical frequency for the application of RF power to the inductive coil  80  may range from 10 MHz to 100 MHz. Similarly, a typical frequency for the application of power to the chuck electrode may range from 0.1 MHz to 100 MHz. In addition, a slotted Faraday shield (not shown) may be employed to reduce capacitive coupling between the inductive coil  80  and the plasma. Moreover, the controller  14  is coupled to the RF generator  82  and the impedance match network  84  in order to control the application of power to the inductive coil  80 . In an alternate embodiment, the inductive coil  80  may be a “spiral” coil or “pancake” coil in communication with the plasma processing region  15  from above as in a transformer coupled plasma (TCP) reactor. The design and implementation of an inductively coupled plasma (ICP) source, or transformer coupled plasma (TCP) source, is well known to those skilled in the art.  
         [0037]     Alternately, the plasma may be formed using electron cyclotron resonance (ECR). In yet another embodiment, the plasma may be formed from the launching of a Helicon wave. In yet another embodiment, the plasma may be formed from a propagating surface wave. Each plasma source described above is well known to those skilled in the art.  
         [0038]     In an example, a design of experiment (DOE) is performed for an oxide etch process in a plasma processing system, such as the one described in  FIG. 2 . The parameter ranges include: a RF power of 1400, 1700, and 2000 Watts; a flow rate of C 4 F 8  of 7, 10, and 13 sccm (standard cubic centimeters per minute); a flow rate of CO of 40, 55, and 70 sccm; a flow rate of O 2  of 2.5, 4, and 5.5 sccm; and a pressure of 30, 45, and 60 mTorr. In this example, the speed of the pumping system is maintained constant, and the flow rate of inert gas (argon) is maintained constant (i.e., 300 sccm). As shown in  FIG. 6 , the valve angle of a valve in the pressure control system varies with the effective pumping speed delivered to the process space, and may be represented by the linear expression: A=kQ/P+b, wherein A represents valve angle, Q represents throughput (Torr-Liter/Second), P represents pressure (Torr), S=Q/P represents the pumping speed, and k, b are constants. Inspection of  FIG. 6  indicates that k is approximately 2.2 and b is approximately 9.9. Therefore, a change in the valve angle translates into a change in the throughput through the plasma processing system, i.e., ΔQ=ΔAP/k. Alternatively, the valve angle may be represented by an expression of the form A=kQ/P+b+f(RF hours), wherein f(RF hours) represents an accounting of the accumulation of residue (over time from, for example, substrate to substrate, lot to lot, or number of RF hours) on interior surfaces of the plasma processing system, including the valve, and its effect on the effective pumping speed. The changes in the valve angle, arising, for example, from maintaining a constant pressure, are indicative of changes in the introduction of process gas(es) to the plasma processing system as well as changes in surface chemistry at the substrate and interior surfaces of the process chamber. These changes in the throughput can be utilized to determine a fault condition in the plasma processing system.  
         [0039]     According to an embodiment of the invention, at least one of a fault condition, an erroneous fault condition, or a service condition is determined for the plasma processing system by monitoring the pressure control system. For example,  FIG. 7  illustrates an exemplary method for monitoring the status of a plasma process system, such as one of the systems depicted in  FIGS. 1 through 5 . The method includes a flow chart  500  beginning at step  510  with executing a process in the plasma processing system. The process may include, for example, an etch process, or a deposition process.  
         [0040]     In step  520 , the pressure control system, coupled to the plasma processing system, is monitored. In one embodiment, a position of a valve is monitored. The position of the valve may include a linear position, or an angular position. For example, changes in the linear position or angular position (valve angle) of the valve may indicate changes in the pressure control system. At least one of the valve positions, or the rate of change of the valve position may be monitored. Alternatively, the speed of a pumping system may be monitored.  
         [0041]     In step  530 , at least one of a fault condition, an erroneous fault condition, or a service condition is determined from monitoring the pressure control system.  
         [0042]     In one example, a position of a valve is monitored during the execution of a process in the plasma processing system. The position of the valve includes a valve angle, wherein variation in the pressure of the process associated with a variation in the flow rate through a mass flow controller coupled to the gas injection system causes a change in the valve angle. When the change in the valve angle during the execution of a process on a substrate exceeds a pre-determined threshold value, an operator of the plasma processing system may be alerted to the occurrence of a fault condition associated with the variation in the mass flow controller. For instance, the threshold value may include an absolute value (known to be always greater than or less than the typical range of values for the valve angle), an upper control limit and lower limit set at a fraction (i.e., 20%) of the mean valve angle during processing, or an upper control limit and a lower control limit set at an integer number (i.e., 3) of root mean square (rms) values of the fluctuation of the valve angle during processing.  
         [0043]     In another example, a position of the valve is monitored during the execution of a process on the substrate in the plasma processing system. During the process, the valve position indicates no abrupt change in position; however, a mass flow controller reports a sudden change in mass flow rate. Based upon this data, an operator may identify the change reported from the mass flow controller as an erroneous fault condition, and continue to process substrates in the plasma processing system. Alternatively, the operator may identify the change reported from the mass flow controller as an erroneous fault condition, and discontinue to process substrates in the plasma processing system in order to investigate the mass flow controller.  
         [0044]     In yet another example, a position of the valve is monitored during the sequential execution of a plurality of substrates through a process in the plasma processing system. During the processing of each substrate, the position, such as a (temporal) mean position, of the valve is monitored as a function of substrate number, lot number, or radio frequency (RF) hours in the plasma processing system. When the position, change in position, or rate of change in the position of the valve becomes greater than (or less than) a pre-determined value, an operator may be notified of a service condition. The service condition may include, for instance, cleaning the plasma processing system in order to remove residue accumulated on the internal surfaces of the plasma processing system.  
         [0045]     In yet another example, a position of the valve is monitored during the formation of a plasma in the plasma processing system. When a plasma is formed, (reactant) process gases are consumed and product gases are generated, the gas temperature increases, and gas deposition occurs at surfaces of the plasma processing system. The cumulative affect of these chemical processes are observed in changes in the gas balance (or throughput) and, hence, within the valve angle as the plasma is formed. Abnormalities in the transition between the non-existence of a plasma in the plasma processing system to the existence of a plasma can indicate the occurrence of a fault condition. For example, when the change in the valve position, or angle, is greater than or less than a pre-determined threshold, an operator may be notified of the occurrence of a fault condition during the formation the plasma.  
         [0046]     Although only certain exemplary embodiments of this invention have been described in detail above, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible in the exemplary embodiments without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of this invention. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this invention.

Technology Category: h