tasksource/deberta-small-long-nli
Zero-Shot Classification
•
Updated
•
131k
•
37
topic
stringlengths 3
73
| argument
stringlengths 24
222
| label
stringclasses 2
values |
---|---|---|
Health insurance mandates | Insurance mandates violate the rights of employers. | CON |
Health insurance mandates | Mandatory insurance violates right to engage in contracts | CON |
Health insurance mandates | Mandate deters uninsured from going to hospital, receiving penalty | CON |
More troops to Afghanistan under Obama | More troops in Afg will inflame broader Muslim anger, terrorism | CON |
More troops to Afghanistan under Obama | More troops in Afghanistan perpetuates corrupt Afghan government | CON |
More troops to Afghanistan under Obama | The military industrial complex profits from escalation in Afg. | CON |
More troops to Afghanistan under Obama | W/o more troops, Afgh will become terrorist haven | PRO |
More troops to Afghanistan under Obama | Defeat in Afghanistan would embolden terrorists globally | PRO |
Health insurance cooperatives | Co-ops lack scale to negotiate prices of drugs, services | CON |
Health insurance cooperatives | Advocates of co-ops are really aiming for socialized medicine | CON |
Health insurance cooperatives | Co-ops compete with insurers like public option could | PRO |
Public health insurance option | Public insurance would stifle medical innovation and advancement | CON |
Public health insurance option | Public insurance inefficiencies can be hidden by taxpayer-funding | CON |
Public health insurance option | Public insurance option will increase taxes, drag-down economy | CON |
Public health insurance option | Public insurance will give doctors/hospitals millions of new patients. | PRO |
Public health insurance option | Public insurance delivers same quality insurance at a lower price | PRO |
Mandatory calorie counts on menus | Mandatory calorie counts infringe restaurants' freedom of speech | CON |
Mandatory calorie counts on menus | Calorie counts are ineffective at compelling healthier choices | CON |
Mandatory calorie counts on menus | Calorie counts on menus will turn-off customers. | CON |
Mandatory calorie counts on menus | Calorie counts eliminate ability of restaurants to be spontaneous. | CON |
Mandatory calorie counts on menus | Calories on menus empower consumers to make healthier choices | PRO |
Mandatory calorie counts on menus | Calorie counts will be ignored by some, but help others | PRO |
Manned mission to Mars | Weight of supplies for long Mars trip is impractical. | CON |
Manned mission to Mars | A manned mission to Mars would unify humankind | PRO |
Manned mission to Mars | Mars mission would inspire kids to become scientists | PRO |
Colonization of the Moon | Moon's gravity is too low for human health | CON |
Colonization of the Moon | Temperature extremes make colonizing the Moon very challenging. | CON |
Colonization of the Moon | Territorial claims on the Moon will become a source of conflict. | CON |
Colonization of the Moon | Moonbase would be ideal staging area for space exploration | PRO |
Colonization of the Moon | Moonbase advances knowledge of human viability on alien planets. | PRO |
Colonization of the Moon | Moonbase will help answer remaining scientific questions | PRO |
Mandatory labeling of genetically modified foods | Arbitrary labeling rules do not offer any real choice | CON |
Mandatory labeling of genetically modified foods | Labeling of genetically modified foods increases food prices. | CON |
Mandatory labeling of genetically modified foods | Different GM labeling standards across countries is a problem | CON |
Mandatory labeling of genetically modified foods | Labeling respects opinion of those not wanting to consume GM foods. | PRO |
Mandatory labeling of genetically modified foods | It is good for labeling to turn consumers off to GM foods. | PRO |
Legality of coca production and consumption | Coca chewing is bad for human health. | CON |
Legality of coca production and consumption | Allowing coca undermines successful eradication efforts. | CON |
Filibuster | Filibuster wrongly burdens majority party | CON |
Filibuster | During turmoil, filibusters impede government progress | CON |
Filibuster | The filibuster helps protect the will of the minority | PRO |
Criminalization of Holocaust denial | Outlawing Holocaust denial risks revisionists being called deniers | CON |
Criminalization of Holocaust denial | Holocaust denial psychologically harms Holocaust survivors | PRO |
Criminalization of Holocaust denial | Holocaust denial is inherently descriminatory and damaging | PRO |
Criminalization of Holocaust denial | Holocaust denial opens doors to harmful, non-factual views | PRO |
Needle exchanges | HIV transmission has increased despite needle exchanges | CON |
Needle exchanges | Needle exchanges don't save lives; cause drug-related deaths | CON |
Needle exchanges | Drug dealers sell drugs near needle exchanges | CON |
Needle exchanges | Needle exchanged increase discarded needles on streets | CON |
Needle exchanges | Needle exchanges generally degrade community cleanliness. | CON |
Needle exchanges | Needle exchanges rightly place harm reduction over all else | PRO |
Needle exchanges | Needle exchanges decrease infections and therefore costs | PRO |
Election of judges | Elected justices are corruptly influenced by campaign funders | CON |
Election of judges | Lawyers may fund judge campaigns to influence trials | CON |
Election of judges | Impossible to avoid big-money influence in judicial elections | CON |
Election of judges | Elections make judges more democratically accountable | PRO |
Election of judges | Elected judges are more in tune with public opinion | PRO |
Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty | Test ban ties hands of good states, while rogue states ignore it | CON |
Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty | Fear will cause nuclear proliferation, despite testing ban. | CON |
Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty | Warheads and deterrence cannot be maintained without testing | CON |
Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty | Test ban halts R&D and development of nuclear weapons | PRO |
Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty | Test ban would help combat growing nuclear threats | PRO |
Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty | Improved monitoring from test ban provides important information | PRO |
Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty | Nuclear test ban reduces risks of nuclear fallout | PRO |
Israeli settlements | Israeli settlements impede creation of Palestinian state | CON |
Israeli settlements | Settlements create separate/unequal laws for Israelis/Palestinians | CON |
Israeli settlements | Settlements undercut Palestinian rights to land | CON |
Israeli settlements | Israeli settlements do not impede creation of Palestine | PRO |
Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict | A two-state solution makes Israel too narrow, vulnerable. | CON |
Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict | Israel loses strategic West Bank mountains in two-state solution | CON |
Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict | Two-state solution offers peace, the most important factor | PRO |
Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict | Two-state solution offers adequate territory to Palestinians | PRO |
Two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict | Two-state solution and peace is critical to regional stability. | PRO |
Merit pay for teachers | Merit pay focuses teachers on measures over their passion | CON |
Merit pay for teachers | Merit pay punishes teachers assigned to bad students | CON |
Merit pay for teachers | Past examples of merit pay for teachers have failed | CON |
Merit pay for teachers | Merit pay gives teachers an incentive to work harder | PRO |
Merit pay for teachers | Merit-pay helps attract teachers where there are shortages | PRO |
Merit pay for teachers | Merit pay works in markets, can work for teachers | PRO |
Enhanced interrogation techniques | Enhanced techniques hamper work with allies against terrorism. | CON |
Is a nuclear Iran intolerable? | Military strikes on Iran would invite painful retaliation | CON |
Earmarks | Earmarks are often unrelated to legislation; holds up bill. | CON |
Earmarks | Earmarks create unsustainable institutional dependencies | CON |
Free public transportation | Car sales would drop significantly. | CON |
Free public transportation | There are many people who would also lose their jobs. | CON |
Free public transportation | Some public transport cities are already terrible; this would just increase the strain. | CON |
Free public transportation | The government would be forced to improve public transport. | PRO |
Free public transportation | A lot of people would already be using it if it didn't cost so much. | PRO |
Education vouchers | Vouchers damage public schools that can't compete with private schools. | CON |
Education vouchers | Profit motive of private schools is costly, undermining vouchers. | CON |
Education vouchers | Vouchers drain talent from public schools, undermining competitiveness. | CON |
Education vouchers | Vouchers improve choice/access despite private school right to deny | PRO |
Education vouchers | Education vouchers improve minority academic achievement. | PRO |
Education vouchers | Vouchers promote innovation and specialisation. | PRO |
No Child Left Behind Act | NCLB sets overly restrictive qualifications for teaching. | CON |
No Child Left Behind Act | No Child Left Behind subjects disabled to same test standards. | CON |
No Child Left Behind Act | No Child Left Behind effectively penalizes diversity in schools. | CON |
No Child Left Behind Act | No Child Left Behind offers valuable measure of student progress | PRO |
No Child Left Behind Act | NCLB has succeeded in improving test scores | PRO |
No Child Left Behind Act | Standardized tests ensures students learn essential information. | PRO |
https://github.com/dwslab/StArCon
@inproceedings{kobbe-etal-2020-unsupervised,
title = "Unsupervised stance detection for arguments from consequences",
author = "Kobbe, Jonathan and
Hulpu{\textcommabelow{s}}, Ioana and
Stuckenschmidt, Heiner",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)",
month = nov,
year = "2020",
address = "Online",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2020.emnlp-main.4",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.4",
pages = "50--60",
abstract = "Social media platforms have become an essential venue for online deliberation where users discuss arguments, debate, and form opinions. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised method to detect the stance of argumentative claims with respect to a topic. Most related work focuses on topic-specific supervised models that need to be trained for every emergent debate topic. To address this limitation, we propose a topic independent approach that focuses on a frequently encountered class of arguments, specifically, on arguments from consequences. We do this by extracting the effects that claims refer to, and proposing a means for inferring if the effect is a good or bad consequence. Our experiments provide promising results that are comparable to, and in particular regards even outperform BERT. Furthermore, we publish a novel dataset of arguments relating to consequences, annotated with Amazon Mechanical Turk.",
}