Task: songer_opinstat

What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to identify whether the opinion writter is identified in the opinion or whether the opinion was per curiam.

PER CURIAM.
The sole question presented to this court in this case, namely, whether the Postmaster General of the United States is an indispensable party to a suit of this nature, has been heretofore decided by this court, and the question is no longer open to dispute. We held, in Neher v. Harwood, Postmaster, etc., 9 Cir., 128 F.2d 846, 852, that the Postmaster General was an indispensable party in an action to enjoin a postmaster from carrying into effect a “fraud” order issued by the Postmaster General under 39 U.S. C.A. § 259.
Accordingly, the order of the court below is affirmed.

Question: Is the opinion writer identified in the opinion, or was the opinion per curiam?
A. Signed, with reasons
B. Per curiam, with reasons
C. Not ascertained
Answer:

Answer: B