Task: songer_adminrev

What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to identify the federal agency (if any) whose decision was reviewed by the court of appeals. If there was no prior agency action, choose "not applicable".

PER CURIAM.
The district court denied habeas corpus relief to appellant Kessinger, a prisoner in the Oklahoma penitentiary, on the ground that he had not exhausted his state remedies as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The record shows that appellant has appealed to the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals from his state conviction and that the appeal is pending and undecided. In such circumstances, he has not exhausted his available remedies-in state courts. Lee v. State of Kansas, 10 Cir., 346 F.2d 48. The various claims that he makes can and should be decided in the Oklahoma courts. Nothing is presented to show that the state remedy is ineffective or inadequate.
Affirmed.

Question: What federal agency's decision was reviewed by the court of appeals?
A. Benefits Review Board
B. Civil Aeronautics Board
C. Civil Service Commission
D. Federal Communications Commission
E. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
F. Federal Power Commission
G. Federal Maritime Commission
H. Federal Trade Commission
I. Interstate Commerce Commission
J. National Labor Relations Board
K. Atomic Energy Commission
L. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
M. Securities & Exchange Commission
N. Other federal agency
O. Not ascertained or not applicable
Answer:

Answer: O