Task: songer_procedur

What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to determine whether there was an issue discussed in the opinion of the court about the interpretation of federal rule of procedures, judicial doctrine, or case law, and if so, whether the resolution of the issue by the court favored the appellant.

PER CURIAM.
This case came on to be heard on appeal from the action of the district court in dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by appellant William Estep, on the relation of his wife, Dora L. Estep.
And it appearing that the appellant has not petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States to review the judgment of the Supreme Court of Tennessee construing the statutes of that state, and that the petitioner has fáiled to exhaust his remedies in the state courts. See Ex parte Hawk, 321 U.S. 114, 64 S.Ct. 448, 88 L.Ed. 572; McCrea v. Jackson, Warden, 6 Cir., 148 F.2d 193.
The judgment below is affirmed.

Question: Did the interpretation of federal rule of procedures, judicial doctrine, or case law by the court favor the appellant?
A. No
B. Yes
C. Mixed answer
D. Issue not discussed
Answer:

Answer: A