Task: songer_weightev

What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. You will be asked a question pertaining to issues that may appear in any civil law cases including civil government, civil private, and diversity cases. The issue is: "Did the factual interpretation by the court or its conclusions (e.g., regarding the weight of evidence or the sufficiency of evidence) favor the appellant?" This includes discussions of whether the litigant met the burden of proof. Answer the question based on the directionality of the appeals court decision. If the court discussed the issue in its opinion and answered the related question in the affirmative, answer "Yes". If the issue was discussed and the opinion answered the question negatively, answer "No". If the opinion considered the question but gave a mixed answer, supporting the respondent in part and supporting the appellant in part, answer "Mixed answer". If the opinion does not discuss the issue, or notes that a particular issue was raised by one of the litigants but the court dismissed the issue as frivolous or trivial or not worthy of discussion for some other reason, answer "Issue not discussed". If the opinion considered the question but gave a "mixed" answer, supporting the respondent in part and supporting the appellant in part (or if two issues treated separately by the court both fell within the area covered by one question and the court answered one question affirmatively and one negatively), answer "Mixed answer". If the opinion either did not consider or discuss the issue at all or if the opinion indicates that this issue was not worthy of consideration by the court of appeals even though it was discussed by the lower court or was raised in one of the briefs, answer "Issue not discussed".

PER CURIAM.
In this proceeding to enforce the order of the National Labor Relations Board, the Board adopted the finding of the Trial Examiner that the respondent union caused the discharge by the employer of an employee Klopp for reasons other than his failure to tender periodic dues, in violation of Section 8(b)(1)(A) and (2) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158 (b)(1) (A) (2).
The Board ordered respondent to cease and desist from violating Section 8(b) (2) and from in any like or related manner restraining or coercing employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in Section 7 of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 157, 'except to the extent that such rights may be affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor organization as a condition of employment, as authorized in Section 8(a)(3) of the Act. It also ordered respondent to make whole the employee discharged for loss of pay suffered thereby, and to post appropriate notices.
The credibility of the witnesses and the reasonable inferences to be drawn from the evidence are matters for determination by the Board. United Fireworks Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 6 Cir., 252 F.2d 428, 430. We are of the opinion that the findings are supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole and must be accepted on this review. N.L.R.B. v. Bishop, 6 Cir., 228 F.2d 68, 70; N.L.R.B. v. Aluminum Workers, etc., 7 Cir., 230 F.2d 515, 520.
The order of the Board based on such findings is not erroneous, and it is decreed that said order be enforced.

Question: Did the factual interpretation by the court or its conclusions (e.g., regarding the weight of evidence or the sufficiency of evidence) favor the appellant?
A. No
B. Yes
C. Mixed answer
D. Issue not discussed
Answer:

Answer: B