Task: songer_casetyp1_1-3-1

What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Your task is to identify the issue in the case, that is, the social and/or political context of the litigation in which more purely legal issues are argued. Put somewhat differently, this field identifies the nature of the conflict between the litigants. The focus here is on the subject matter of the controversy rather than its legal basis.
Your task is to determine the specific issue in the case within the broad category of "criminal - federal offense". 

OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM.
The District Court denied the defendant Jackson’s petition for vacation of sentence which was premised on his contention that he was deprived of his right to counsel at all phases of the criminal proceedings against him and that as a result he made an involuntary confession and entered a guilty plea to an indictment charging him with theft of a money order while in the employ of the Internal Revenue Service.
On review of the record we find no error.
The Order of the District Court denying Jackson’s petition will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated in Judge Wortendyke’s Opinion, 302 F.Supp. 216.

Question: What is the specific issue in the case within the general category of "criminal - federal offense"?
A. murder
B. rape
C. arson
D. aggravated assault
E. robbery
F. burglary
G. auto theft
H. larceny (over $50)
I. other violent crimes
J. narcotics
K. alcohol related crimes, prohibition
L. tax fraud
M. firearm violations
N. morals charges (e.g., gambling, prostitution, obscenity)
O. criminal violations of government regulations of business
P. other white collar crime (involving no force or threat of force; e.g., embezzlement, computer fraud,bribery)
Q. other crimes
R. federal offense, but specific crime not ascertained
Answer:

Answer: H