Task: songer_geniss

What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Your task is to identify the issue in the case, that is, the social and/or political context of the litigation in which more purely legal issues are argued. Put somewhat differently, this field identifies the nature of the conflict between the litigants. The focus here is on the subject matter of the controversy rather than its legal basis. Consider the following categories: "criminal" (including appeals of conviction, petitions for post conviction relief, habeas corpus petitions, and other prisoner petitions which challenge the validity of the conviction or the sentence), "civil rights" (excluding First Amendment or due process; also excluding claims of denial of rights in criminal proceeding or claims by prisoners that challenge their conviction or their sentence (e.g., habeas corpus petitions are coded under the criminal category); does include civil suits instituted by both prisoners and callable non-prisoners alleging denial of rights by criminal justice officials), "First Amendment", "due process" (claims in civil cases by persons other than prisoners, does not include due process challenges to government economic regulation), "privacy", "labor relations", "economic activity and regulation", and "miscellaneous".

PER CURIAM.
The Tax Court held that petitioner club cannot be exempted from taxation under Section 101(9) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C. § 101 (9), as a club “organized and operated exclusively for pleasure, recreation, and other nonprofitable purposes, no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder.” Petitioner club meticulously fulfils the Code requirements except that it operates a small members death benefit fund which was commenced by a transfer of $500 from its general funds and for which a fourth of dues paid is set aside. Though nonprofitable, the purpose of the fund is not for “ ‘pleasure [or] recreation’ ” or similar purpose as the language “ ‘and other nonprofitable purposes’ ” has been construed by this court. Keystone Automobile Club v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 1950, 181 F.2d 402, 403. We are bound by that decision and therefore the decision of the Tax Court will be affirmed.
. See also Chattanooga Automobile Club 7. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 1950, 182 F.2d 551.

Question: What is the general issue in the case?
A. criminal
B. civil rights
C. First Amendment
D. due process
E. privacy
F. labor relations
G. economic activity and regulation
H. miscellaneous
Answer:

Answer: G