Task: songer_adminrev

What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to identify the federal agency (if any) whose decision was reviewed by the court of appeals. If there was no prior agency action, choose "not applicable".

PER CURIAM:
To recover damages for the death of William Edwin Baughn when struck by a train of the Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company on June 1, 1966, while driving a truck over a highway crossing of the tracks a few miles east of Liles-ville, North Carolina, his administratrix sued the railroad. The District Court directed a verdict for the defendant and dismissed the action, for the decedent’s contributory negligence.
In his opinion, Baughn. v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company, 291 F.Supp. 425 (M.D.N.C.1968), the District Judge recounts closely and with clarity the proofs upon the tragic event. The issue of contributory negligence is decided in this context and in the frame of the law of North Carolina. Since our review discloses no substantial error in the premises or the final determination, we cannot overrule the dismissal.
Affirmed.

Question: What federal agency's decision was reviewed by the court of appeals?
A. Benefits Review Board
B. Civil Aeronautics Board
C. Civil Service Commission
D. Federal Communications Commission
E. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
F. Federal Power Commission
G. Federal Maritime Commission
H. Federal Trade Commission
I. Interstate Commerce Commission
J. National Labor Relations Board
K. Atomic Energy Commission
L. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
M. Securities & Exchange Commission
N. Other federal agency
O. Not ascertained or not applicable
Answer:

Answer: O