Task: songer_geniss

What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Your task is to identify the issue in the case, that is, the social and/or political context of the litigation in which more purely legal issues are argued. Put somewhat differently, this field identifies the nature of the conflict between the litigants. The focus here is on the subject matter of the controversy rather than its legal basis. Consider the following categories: "criminal" (including appeals of conviction, petitions for post conviction relief, habeas corpus petitions, and other prisoner petitions which challenge the validity of the conviction or the sentence), "civil rights" (excluding First Amendment or due process; also excluding claims of denial of rights in criminal proceeding or claims by prisoners that challenge their conviction or their sentence (e.g., habeas corpus petitions are coded under the criminal category); does include civil suits instituted by both prisoners and callable non-prisoners alleging denial of rights by criminal justice officials), "First Amendment", "due process" (claims in civil cases by persons other than prisoners, does not include due process challenges to government economic regulation), "privacy", "labor relations", "economic activity and regulation", and "miscellaneous".

PER CURIAM.
On May 22, 1934, this court, upon the petition of the appellant, granted a rehearing for the purpose of further considering two questions:
(1) Can the effect of section 5741, Rev. St. Mo. 1929 (Mo. St. Ann. § 5741, p. 4388), as interpreted by the Supreme Court of Missouri in the case of Gooch v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 61 S.W.(2d) 704, be considered by this court upon this appeal, in view of the pleadings and proceedings in the eourt below?
(2) If that section can be considered by this eourt upon this appeal, is it, as apparently now construed by the Supreme Court of Missouri, void or, for any reason, inapplicable to the policy here involved?
These questions have now been briefed and reargued, and we have further considered them.
Our conclusion is that the broad issue of the right of the appellant to recover upon the policy of insurance in question was before the court below and is before this court; that section 5741, Rev. St. Mo. 1929, was a part of the policy; and that the appellant is entitled to the construction of that statute adopted by the Supreme Court of Missouri in the ease above referred to, regardless of the fact that that construction was first placed upon this statute after this case was tried.
Our opinion, heretofore filed, will stand as the opinion in this case.
The judgment is reversed, and the case remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this court.

Question: What is the general issue in the case?
A. criminal
B. civil rights
C. First Amendment
D. due process
E. privacy
F. labor relations
G. economic activity and regulation
H. miscellaneous
Answer:

Answer: G