Task: songer_procedur

What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to determine whether there was an issue discussed in the opinion of the court about the interpretation of federal rule of procedures, judicial doctrine, or case law, and if so, whether the resolution of the issue by the court favored the appellant.

PER CURIAM:
We affirmed, 455 F.2d 1406, the conviction of John Leslie Lenhard for failing to report and submit to induction into the armed forces in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462 (1964). In response to Lenhard’s petition for a writ of certi-orari, the Solicitor General asserted a position different from that previously advanced by the United States in this court and urged the Supreme Court to grant the petition, vacate our judgment and reverse the conviction. The Supreme Court granted the petition, vacated our judgment and remanded the case to us for consideration in light of the Solicitor General’s newly asserted position. 405 U.S. 1013, 92 S.Ct. 1296, 31 L.Ed.2d 477 (1972).
Accordingly, we reverse Lenhard’s conviction.

Question: Did the interpretation of federal rule of procedures, judicial doctrine, or case law by the court favor the appellant?
A. No
B. Yes
C. Mixed answer
D. Issue not discussed
Answer:

Answer: B