Task: songer_procedur

What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to determine whether there was an issue discussed in the opinion of the court about the interpretation of federal rule of procedures, judicial doctrine, or case law, and if so, whether the resolution of the issue by the court favored the appellant.

PER CURIAM.
The appellant contends that the judgment of the court below should be reversed, asserting that no actionable negligence was shown on its part which was the proximate cause of the accident, that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence, that the evidence as to the impaired physical condition of the plaintiff was insufficient, and that the verdict was excessive. Every contention made is fully answered by the opinion of Judge Stewart. See 107 F.Supp. 361. Since we perceive no error, the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Question: Did the interpretation of federal rule of procedures, judicial doctrine, or case law by the court favor the appellant?
A. No
B. Yes
C. Mixed answer
D. Issue not discussed
Answer:

Answer: A