Task: songer_procedur

What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to determine whether there was an issue discussed in the opinion of the court about the interpretation of federal rule of procedures, judicial doctrine, or case law, and if so, whether the resolution of the issue by the court favored the appellant.

PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal in a habeas corpus case by a prisoner who is imprisoned in the Maryland penitentiary under the-sentence and judgment of a Maryland state- court. The application for the writ was properly denied since application for habeas corpus on practically the same grounds was denied by the Maryland courts, Goodman v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, Md., 60 A.2d 527, and certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court, Goodman v. Swenson, 335 U.S. 847, 69 S.Ct. 58. There are no allegations which would justify the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus by the lower federal courts under such circumstances. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 and Wade v. Mayo, 334 U.S. 672, 68 S.Ct. 1270.
Affirmed.

Question: Did the interpretation of federal rule of procedures, judicial doctrine, or case law by the court favor the appellant?
A. No
B. Yes
C. Mixed answer
D. Issue not discussed
Answer:

Answer: A