Task: songer_concur

What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Your task is to determine the number of judges who either wrote a concurring opinion, joined a concurring opinion, or who indicated that they concurred in the result but not in the opinion of the court.

PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard upon the transcript, briefs, and arguments of counsel; and it appearing that the testimony of an accomplice need not be corroborated to support a conviction [Caminetti v. United States, 242 U.S. 470, 495, 37 S.Ct. 192, 61 L.Ed. 442, L.R.A. 1917F, 502, Ann.Cas.1917B, 1168; Nibbelink v. United States, 6 Cir., 73 F.2d 677, 678; United States v. Muraskin, 2 Cir., 99 F.2d 815], and that there is sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and it is hereby affirmed.

Question: What is the number of judges who concurred in the result but not in the opinion of the court?
A. 0
B. 1
C. 2
D. 3
E. 4
F. 5
G. 6
H. 7
I. 8
J. 9
K. 10
L. 11
M. 12
N. 13
O. 14
P. 15
Q. Not ascertained
Answer:

Answer: A