Task: songer_fedlaw

What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to determine whether there was an issue discussed in the opinion of the court about the interpretation of federal statute, and if so, whether the resolution of the issue by the court favored the appellant.

PER CURIAM.
We conclude that the order of the Federal. Maritime Commission had “ ‘warrant in the record’ and a reasonable basis-in law.” N. L. R. B. v. Hearst Publications, 322 U.S. 111, 131, 64 S.Ct. 851, 88 L.Ed. 1170 (1944). We do not consider it appropriate in the circumstances of' this case to consider the questions presented for the first time in the petition for review filed in this Court. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc., 344 U.S. 33, 36-37, 73 S.Ct. 67, 97 L.Ed.. 54 (1952).
The order is affirmed.

Question: Did the interpretation of federal statute by the court favor the appellant?
A. No
B. Yes
C. Mixed answer
D. Issue not discussed
Answer:

Answer: D