Task: songer_appel1_8_2

What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
When coding the detailed nature of participants, use your personal knowledge about the participants, if you are completely confident of the accuracy of your knowledge, even if the specific information is not in the opinion. For example, if "IBM" is listed as the appellant it could be classified as "clearly national or international in scope" even if the opinion did not indicate the scope of the business. 

Your task concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "miscellaneous". Your task is to determine which of the following categories best describes the litigant.

PER CURIAM:
Appellant, Evelyn Marks, who, as Executrix of her deceased father’s estate, holds shares of stock in Raljoed Realty Co., Inc. and Park Towers Corp., appeals from the order of Judge Palmieri dismissing her petition to review the order of Referee Babitt, dismissing petitions filed by her “on. behalf of” those New York Corporations to have each of them adjudicated voluntary bankrupts. We affirm the dismissal order below.
The Boards of Directors of the corporations conferred no authority upon appellant to prepare and file the petitions, and the Referee acted properly in dismissing and in vacating any orders made in proceedings thereon prior to the dismissal orders.
We need not enlarge upon the discussions contained in the opinions below which set forth the applicable law that a stockholder of a New York corporation who does not act by authority of the corporation’s directors may not file a petition in bankruptcy for the corporation, 277 F.Supp. 225.

Question: This question concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "miscellaneous". Which of the following categories best describes the litigant?
A. fiduciary, executor, or trustee
B. other
C. nature of the litigant not ascertained
Answer:

Answer: B