Task: songer_counsel1

What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
Your task is to determine the nature of the counsel for the appellant. If name of attorney was given with no other indication of affiliation, assume it is private - unless a government agency was the party

PER CURIAM.
On September 26,1960, we affirmed the judgment of Mende’s conviction. Mende v. United States, 9 Cir., 282 F.2d 881.
With prison facing him, Mende has obtained new counsel who has made below a collateral attack on the judgment, claiming the indictment was so fatally defective that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to try him. The trial court rejected it.
The government makes a number of suggestions as to why Mende had no standing below or here to now be heard. But in our opinions its objections do not go to the naked right of a court to hear the collateral attack. Therefore, we consider the attack on its merits.
Under critical examination, the indictment could be improved. But the whole point defendant-appellant makes, could have been taken care of by proffering a precautionary instruction. Such was not done. We hold the indictment was not so fatally defective as to deprive the court of jurisdiction.
The order appealed from is affirmed.

Question: What is the nature of the counsel for the appellant?
A. none (pro se)
B. court appointed
C. legal aid or public defender
D. private
E. government - US
F. government - state or local
G. interest group, union, professional group
H. other or not ascertained
Answer:

Answer: D