Datasets:

pile-of-law
/

pile-of-law

	---
	annotations_creators:
	- no-annotation
	language_creators:
	- found
	language:
	- en
	license:
	- cc-by-nc-sa-4.0
	multilinguality:
	- monolingual
	pretty_name: pile-of-law
	size_categories:
	- 10M<n<100M
	source_datasets: []
	task_categories:
	- fill-mask
	task_ids:
	- masked-language-modeling
	viewer: false
	---

	# Dataset Card for Pile of Law

	## Table of Contents
	- [Table of Contents](#table-of-contents)
	- [Dataset Description](#dataset-description)
	- [Dataset Summary](#dataset-summary)
	- [Supported Tasks and Leaderboards](#supported-tasks-and-leaderboards)
	- [Languages](#languages)
	- [Dataset Structure](#dataset-structure)
	- [Data Instances](#data-instances)
	- [Data Fields](#data-fields)
	- [Data Splits](#data-splits)
	- [Dataset Creation](#dataset-creation)
	- [Curation Rationale](#curation-rationale)
	- [Source Data](#source-data)
	- [Annotations](#annotations)
	- [Personal and Sensitive Information](#personal-and-sensitive-information)
	- [Considerations for Using the Data](#considerations-for-using-the-data)
	- [Social Impact of Dataset](#social-impact-of-dataset)
	- [Discussion of Biases](#discussion-of-biases)
	- [Other Known Limitations](#other-known-limitations)
	- [Additional Information](#additional-information)
	- [Dataset Curators](#dataset-curators)
	- [Licensing Information](#licensing-information)
	- [Citation Information](#citation-information)
	- [Contributions](#contributions)

	## Dataset Description

	- Homepage: https://huggingface.co/datasets/pile-of-law/pile-of-law
	- Repository: https://huggingface.co/datasets/pile-of-law/pile-of-law
	- Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.00220

	### Dataset Summary

	We curate a large corpus of legal and administrative data. The utility of this data is twofold: (1) to aggregate legal and administrative data sources that demonstrate different norms and legal standards for data filtering; (2) to collect a dataset that can be used in the future for pretraining legal-domain language models, a key direction in access-to-justice initiatives.

	### Supported Tasks and Leaderboards

	See paper for details.

	### Languages

	English

	## Dataset Structure

	### Data Instances

	courtListener_docket_entry_documents : Docket entries in U.S. federal courts, including filed briefs from CourtListener RECAP archive.

	courtListener_opinions : U.S. court opinions from CourtListener.

	atticus_contracts: Unannotated contracts from the Atticus Project.

	federal_register: The U.S. federal register where agencies file draft rulemaking.

	bva_opinions: Bureau of Veterans Appeals opinions.

	us_bills: Draft Bills from the United States Congress.

	cc_casebooks: Educational Casebooks released under open CC licenses.

	tos: Unannotated Terms of Service contracts.

	euro_parl: European parliamentary debates.

	nlrb_decisions: Decisions from the U.S. National Labor Review Board.

	scotus_oral_arguments: U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

	cfr: U.S. Code of Federal Regulations

	state_codes: U.S. State Codes

	scotus_filings: Briefs and filings with the U.S. Supreme Court.

	bar_exam_outlines: Bar exam outlines available openly on the web.

	edgar: Contracts filed with the SEC and made available on the SEC's Edgar tool.

	cfpb_creditcard_contracts: Credit Card Contracts compiled by the U.S. Consumer Finance Protection Bureau.

	constitutions : The World's constitutions.

	congressional_hearings : U.S. Congressional hearing transcripts and statements.

	oig: U.S. Office of Inspector general reports.

	olc_memos: U.S. Office of Legal Counsel memos.

	uscode: The United States Code (laws).

	founding_docs: Letters from U.S. founders.

	ftc_advisory_opinions: Advisory opinions by the Federal Trade Commission.

	echr : European Court of Human Rights opinions.

	eurlex: European Laws.

	tax_rulings: Rulings from U.S. Tax court.

	un_debates: U.N. General Debates

	fre: U.S. Federal Rules of Evidence

	frcp : U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

	canadian_decisions: Canadian Court Opinions from ON and BC.

	eoir: U.S. Executive Office for Immigration Review Immigration and Nationality Precedential Decisions

	dol_ecab: Department of Labor Employees' Compensation Appeals Board decisions after 2006

	r_legaladvice : Filtered data from the r/legaladvice and r/legaladviceofftopic subreddits in the format.
	Title: [Post Title]
	Topic: [Post Flair]
	Answer \#[N]: [Top Answers]...


	### Data Fields

	- text: the document text
	- created_timestamp: If the original source provided a timestamp when the document was created we provide this as well. Note, these may be inaccurate. For example CourtListener case opinions provide the timestamp of when it was uploaded to CourtListener not when the opinion was published. We welcome pull requests to correct this field if such inaccuracies are discovered.
	- downloaded_timestamp: When the document was scraped.
	- url: the source url

	### Data Splits

	There is a train/validation split for each subset of the data. 75%/25%

	## Dataset Creation

	### Curation Rationale

	We curate a large corpus of legal and administrative data. The utility of this data is twofold: (1) to aggregate legal and administrative data sources that demonstrate different norms and legal standards for data filtering; (2) to collect a dataset that can be used in the future for pretraining legal-domain language models, a key direction in access-to-justice initiatives. As such, data sources are curated to inform: (1) legal analysis, knowledge, or understanding; (2) argument formation; (3) privacy filtering standards. Sources like codes and laws tend to inform (1). Transcripts and court filings tend to inform (2). Opinions tend to inform (1) and (3).

	### Source Data

	#### Initial Data Collection and Normalization

	We do not normalize the data, but we provide dataset creation code and relevant urls in https://github.com/Breakend/PileOfLaw

	#### Who are the source language producers?

	Varied (see sources above).

	### Personal and Sensitive Information

	This dataset may contain personal and sensitive information. However, this has been previously filtered by the relevant government and federal agencies that weigh the harms of revealing this information against the benefits of transparency. If you encounter something particularly harmful, please file a takedown request with the upstream source and notify us in the communities tab. We will then remove the content. We cannot enable more restrictive licensing because upstream sources may restrict using a more restrictive license. However, we ask that all users of this data respect the upstream licenses and restrictions. Per the standards of CourtListener, we do not allow indexing of this data by search engines and we ask that others do not also. Please do not turn on anything that allows the data to be easily indexed.

	## Considerations for Using the Data

	### Social Impact of Dataset

	We hope that this dataset will provide more mechanisms for doing data work. As we describe in the paper, the internal variation allows contextual privacy rules to be learned. If robust mechanisms for this are developed they can applied more broadly. This dataset can also potentially be used for legal language model pretraining. As discussed in ``On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models'', legal language models can help improve access to justice in various ways. But they can also be used in potentially harmful ways. While such models are not ready for most production environments and are the subject of significant research, we ask that model creators using this data, particularly when creating generative models, consider the impacts of their model and make a good faith effort to weigh the benefits against the harms of their method. Our license and many of the sub-licenses also restrict commercial usage.

	### Discussion of Biases

	The data reflects the biases of governments and courts. As we discuss in our work, these can be significant, though more recent text will likely be less overtly toxic. Please see the above statement and embark on any model uses responsibly.

	### Other Known Limitations

	We mainly focus on U.S. and English-speaking legal sources, though we include some European and Canadian resources.

	## Additional Information

	### Licensing Information

	CreativeCommons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International. But individual sources may have other licenses. See paper for details. Some upstream data sources request that indexing be disabled. As such please do not re-host any data in a way that can be indexed by search engines.

	### Citation Information

	For a citation to this work:

	```
	@misc{hendersonkrass2022pileoflaw,
	url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.00220},
	author = {Henderson, Peter and Krass, Mark S. and Zheng, Lucia and Guha, Neel and Manning, Christopher D. and Jurafsky, Dan and Ho, Daniel E.},
	title = {Pile of Law: Learning Responsible Data Filtering from the Law and a 256GB Open-Source Legal Dataset},
	publisher = {arXiv},
	year = {2022}
	}
	```

	Since this dataset also includes several other data sources with citations, please refer to our paper and cite the additional relevant work in addition to our own work.