anchor
stringlengths
5
1.82k
entailment
stringlengths
1
351
contradiction
stringlengths
1
295
metadata
dict
Now conservatives are fighting back.
Conservatives are battling now.
Conservatives have given up and conceded that they are wrong on all matters.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
But the explanation is institutional, not ideological.
The explanation isn't ideological.
The explanation is ideological not institutional.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
They celebrate the U.S. women's comparative innocence.
The U.S women are comparatively innocent.
They berate the U.S women for their comparative innocence.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
The Liberal Humanitarians (a k a Red-Tailed Hawks)
Red tailed hawks are liberal humanitarians.
Conservative humanitarians aka red tailed hawks.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Republicans have a "I stole all your money hahaha" outdoor barbecue.
Some people are having a barbecue outdoors.
Some ladies are getting their hair done.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Democrats offered more spending and lost the House.
Democrats spent more so they lost the house.
Democrats kept the house because if their spending.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Republican term limit traitors don't need to apologize for changing their minds, which they have every right to do.
Republican term limit traitors have the right to change their minds.
Republican term limit traitors do not have the right to change their minds.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
yeah there are there's uh big military constituency
Correct and there's a lot of people who support the military.
There's a whole foods here and everyone here opposes the military.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Those others are presumably still in office.
We presume those others are still in office.
Those others have left office years ago.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
The triumvirate has outgrown ideology and practices pure Realeconomik.
Realeconomik is a new practice.
Realeconomik is an old practice.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Though this party fell into disfavor for some time, their fundamentalist concerns, shared by members of the Shiv Sena party, increased in popularity in subsequent years.
The fundamentalist concerns of the party increased in popularity, even if the party itself fell into disfavor.
This party's support grew and grew for as long as it existed.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
that's true i i've been Democrat for since i've been voting which isn't that long but i'll agree with you there that there's not much organization going on
As long as I have been voting I have been a Democrat but I don't think they are organized.
For as long as I have been voting I have been voting Republican.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
They appeal to patriotism and then to anarchism.
They are patriotic.
They are against their country.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Republicans reply that they're serving their country by debunking and thwarting a bad policy administered by a bad president.
Republicans reply that they serve their county with debunking and thwarting policy administered by a bad president.
Republicans reply that they serve their county through aiding the goals of the president.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Shields notes that the Democrats are in a win-win situation--if the bill dies, the Republicans can be attacked as pro-teen smoking; if it passes, the Democrats can claim credit.
The democrats are in a win win situation with this bill.
The democrats are in a lose lose situation here.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Republicans aren't sure whether to blame the spy case on ideology or corruption.
Ideology and corruption are both suspect in the spy case.
Republicans do not blame the spy case on anything.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
they'll just say oh well you know the Republicans have this election we'll see you in four years
They will cede the election to the Republicans
They are claiming to have won the election for the Democrats.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
The second pedophilia scare has served a more pragmatic legislative blackmail.
Scared by pedophilia not once but twice, there is a more sensible basis for legislative blackmail.
There has only ever been one pedophilia scare.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
A piece suggests that Americans aren't seduced by Republican offers of a generous federal tax cut.
The generous federal tax cut offered by Republicans isn't appealing to Americans.
Americans are in love with the Republican tax plan.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
The Liberal Humanitarians are a product of the post-Cold War peace.
Post-Cold War peace resulted in the creation of The Liberal Humanitarians.
The Liberal Humanitarians are a result of stress during the Cold War.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
And it is impossible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing upon the First Amendment question, which, to repeat, is whether the funding scheme is 'manipulated' to have a 'coercive effect' on those who do not hold the subsidized position.
It is not possible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing on the First Amendment question.
The difference from Rust on the First Amendment question is very noticeable.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Bush plays up his born-again faith to the religious right.
Bush caters to the religious right with his faith.
Bush does not cater to the religious right.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Since 1994, when Republicans took over as the majority party in the Congress, GOP members have charged that the LSC takes part in political activities.
Republicans, since 1994, have declared that the LSC engages in politics.
Since 1994, Republicans have consistently denied that the LSC takes part in politics.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
They may prevent you from associating with the senator at an exclusive cocktail party for lobbyists and other large givers--but that's the whole idea.
Their whole agenda is to prevent you from engaging with other relevant circles.
They openly allow you to engage freely.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
What is odd about these libertarian conclusions is that they do not at all follow from the premises.
Libertarian conclusions are loosely based.
Dogs are the world's leading producers of fine Sushi.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
They are in the Reform Party.
They are members of a political party.
They are Republicans.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Being loyal Republicans, Lamar's contributors talk about such happenings only obliquely.
Those who donated to Lamar are loyal Republicans.
The Republicans who donated to Lamar constantly betray their party.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
McCain : Medical Savings Accounts, etcetera.
McCain: Accounts related to health.
McCain: Farmers Market Account, etc.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
The gay rights groups claim the ex-gay movement is a public relations front for conservative efforts to discriminate against gays.
They say the ex-gay movement is just a front from conservatives to discriminate against gays.
They say that the support from conservatives will stop the ex-gay movement
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
This suggests that paycheck protection will likely live on more as a rhetorical excuse for Republican opponents of campaign reform than as an actual cause.
Paycheck protection will likely live on more as a rhetorical excuse for republican opponents of campaign reform.
Paycheck protection will not help either party in the campaign.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Meanwhile, liberals in the Democratic party have been publicly embracing the idiom of hard work and personal responsibility.
Members of the Democratic party have liberal views.
Republicans do not believe in hard work.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Not all Republican moderates are Moderates.
Republicans are not always what they claim to be.
All Republican moderates are Moderates.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Republicans should counter with logical, informative statements that point out the costs involved in litigation.
Republicans should give the facts about the costs.
Republicans informed the public about the low costs of litigation.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Another favorite Republican cause is the Small Business Administration, which exists to make loans to companies that banks deem nonviable.
The Small Business Administration gives loans.
''The SBA does not do loans at all'' would be incorrect, because they do.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
The privilege squabble, in fact, marks the first time the Dead President defense has failed.
This is the first time that the Dead President argument hasn't succeeded.
This isn't the first time that arguing the Dead President defense hasn't succeeded.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
As it happens, McCain says he supports both paycheck protection and stockholder protection.
McCain supports stockholder protection and paycheck protection.
McCain does not support either paycheck protection or stockholder protection.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
The other rhetorical way out for Republican politicians is to say that you yourself are as hard-core as ever, but since a majority of Americans apparently disagrees, there's no point in trying to do anything about it it.
More Americans are against rather than for the Republican rhetoric.
All Americans support the same ideologies.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
As discussed below, we strongly disagree with the Vice Presidentas positions.
As stated, they do not at all agree with the Vice Presidenta.
They wholeheartedly agree with the Vice Presidenta.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Even Moms Allen seems to be turning Californian.
Moms Allen seems to be becoming a Californian too.
Moms Allen is protesting going Californian.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Others blame Republicans for muting substantive conservative issues such as education reform in a misguided wager that the Lewinsky scandal would bring conservative voters to the polls.
Others say Republicans tried to stop discussion about some conservative issues.
Others say Republicans tried to encourage discussion about some conservative issues.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Liberal interest groups and the White House scrambled to find new objections to the larger Among other things, they warned that it threatens legal immigrants with deportation and diminishes their safeguards against job discrimination.
The legal immigrants are threatened with deportation and discrimination.
Liberal interest groups threaten legal immigrants with deportation.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
He can drop the pretense that he's nonpartisan.
He can stop pretending that he's nonpartisan.
He can stop pretending that he's bipartisan.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
The former POV might be thought of as Democratic, the latter Republican.
The latter POV is thought of as a Republican.
The latter POV has never been described as a Republican.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
and most of them are partying
The majority are doing parties.
and none of them are partying.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
And Democrats, who want to run against the do-nothing Republicans in 2000, are happy to stall major legislation.
Democrats want to run in 2000.
Democrats think they will lose it all in 2000.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
They have mainstream acceptance and no shock value, and are worn by young career women and old grandmothers alike.
They are mainstream and conservative.
They are edgy and controversial.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Bob Barr, R-Ga.) Yet it must be punitive enough that Republicans will be satisfied.
Yet it must the enough punishment to appease the Republicans.
The Republicans will not be satisfied even by this punishment.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Congressional war powers are not an entirely lost cause.
Congressional war powers are not pointless.
Congressional war powers are completely a lost cause.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Volunteers from Britain and the US arrived to fight on the side of the Republicans.
The Republicans benefited from volunteer fighters coming from the United States.
No help was obtained from British individuals by the Republicans.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
The RPH who must legislate or govern (Gingrich, Kasich, Bush) is quieter about his principles--probably because he actually has to live by them.
The RPH is expected to live by his principles.
Nobody expects the RPH to live by the principles he talks about.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
The majority leader, while conservative, cares more about passing bills than about ideology.
The majority leader's main concern is to pass new legislation.
The majority leader will prioritize ideology over passing new legislation.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Theirs is now the dominant right-wing critique of integrationist programs.
Integrationist programs now criticize right wing politics.
Right wing politics is praised by the integrationist.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
The Democratic base will awaken.
The democrats will wake up.
The democratic base will rest.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
The Nixon Analogy: Why the Flytrap-Watergate comparison will backfire.
Comparisons between Watergate and Flytrap are sure to backfire.
The Flytrap-Watergate comparison is more apt than previously admitted as far as making comparisons to Nixon go.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Consider the rest of the Republican
Take the other part of the Republican into account.
Do not take the other part of the Republican into account.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
You might think mainstream conservatives would be wary of Klayman's tactics.
You shouldn't think that those on the right are sharp to what Klayman does.
Mainstream conservatives are very wary of Klayman's tactics.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
But so far, conservatives have been silent, perhaps because Klayman has proved remarkably effective at abusing the people most right-wingers dislike.
Thus far, conservatives haven't been making much noise.
Conservatives have been loud in their protests against Klayman.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Republicans smell their opportunity.
The Republicans feel their chance.
The Republicans have no idea of their luck.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
i don't i don't know what Foley's is uh-huh yeah
I haven't heard of Foley's before.
No, I've known Foley's for a long time.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
yeah absolutely i think the republic rats have uh driven this country downhill for too long
I think republic rats have ruined the country.
The republic rats have saved us!
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
All ideological differences between Democrats and Republicans.
Republicans and Democrats have ideological differences.
Democrats and Republicans don't have any differences in ideology.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
One difference is that this time around, Democrats are less likely to get played for suckers.
Democrats will not be "played for suckers"
The Democrats will be taken advantage of.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Republicans say that organized labor spent $200 million to $500 million promoting Democratic candidates last year.
Republicans said unions supported Democrats.
Democrats said unions supported Republicans.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
uh certainly not presidential but but quite possibly VP and here they are they they know very well they can't do it because if they do it's going to split the party and if they do it they're going to alienate a whole bunch of others so i mean they were stuck one way or the other yeah it was an interesting thing i was laughing through the whole thing uh
They're in a bit of a catch-22.
I thought it was extremely boring and dull.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Bush's Republican rivals are happy to exploit and hide behind the media's pseudo-objectivity.
Bush has Republican rivals.
Bush's Republican rivals are upset at how objective the media are.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
uh they do what they think is either best for the you know the the uh economy or whatever's best for the people that are the lobbyists that are paying you know part of their way
They act in the economy or their lobbyists' best interests.
They always do what is in the best interest of the public.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
In the 1990s, northern fiscal conservatives such as Anderson, Tsongas, and Rudman have backed free-trade agreements such as NAFTA.
NAFTA was backed by northern fiscal conservatives in the 1990s.
NAFTA was backed by northern fiscal progressives and liberals in the 1990s.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
but now you know people don't they don't support each other that way
People don't support each other
People always support each other, I can vouch for that
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
The factional war within the Reform Party, then, represents the decomposition of the movement into its Northern progressive and Southern populist wings.
There is significant unrest within the Reform Party.
The Reform party is as stable as ever.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
well they have a whole nation behind them you got to remember that instead of just you know one section of the country like we have
it's important to remember that they have a whole country supporting them
you've got to remember that they have very little support from their country
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
And regardless of who supports them, these guys have a lot of expertise to offer, don't they?
They are experts.
They don't know about anything.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
On Friday's NewsHour , Gigot asks, Is this a Republican Congress?
Gigot inquires if Congress is controlled by the republicans
Gogot states that this is a Democratic Congress.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Similarly, Bush boasts that he's a uniter, not a divider, while the RLC complains that Forbes, by criticizing Dole in 1996, caused fighting within the Republican Party that was divisive and not inclusive.
According to Bush he is a uniter, not a divider.
Bush is a divider, not a uniter.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
And slight as they are, most of Kasich's proposed cuts aren't really corporate welfare at all.
Kasich's proposed cuts are slight but are not corporate welfare.
Kasich's has proposed large cuts that are probably corporate welfare.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
8) The media will turn on the GOP.
The GOP will be criticized by the media.
The media will support the GOP.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
The largest Republican constituency may be the Tight-Lipped Republicans . These folks, who include old-timers such as Virginia's John Warner, Alaska's Ted Stevens, and Mississippi's Thad Cochran, are as annoyed by the president as the next guy.
John Warner and Ted Stevens are Republicans.
Warner and Stevens have sided with the Democrats all year.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Buchanan or Bush vs. the congressional Republicans.
There are Republicans in Congress.
Bush and Buchanan are in agreement with the congressional Republicans.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
They've used the same pollster and seen the same Americans favor equal treatment of gays in the workplace but oppose gay marriage, probably because the latter involves sex.
Some Americans favor equal treatment of gays but oppose gay marriage.
All Americans support gay marriage and have no problems with it.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
These groups feel uncomfortable with the Christian Coalition, the most powerful organization on the right and the one most committed to reviving the popular-front approach.
The Christian Coalition is a powerful right-wing organization.
The Christian Coalition is an important Democrat organization.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Also, you have no obligation to the Libertarian Party to fight on every street corner in its defense.
You have no obligation to fight for the libertarian party to fight everywhere.
You have to fight for the libertarians every chance you have.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
yeah all the Democrats trying to show that yeah oh oh gosh we really did support it i mean just because we wanted to impeach him doesn't mean anything
The Democrats are trying to show that they really did support it.
The Democrats aren't trying to show they supported it.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
The under-30s despise Mexico's corrupt, one-party government, but they are not as skeptical about capitalism as the leftist candidates they voted for.
The leftist candidates are skeptical about capitalists.
THe leftists are not at all skeptical.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Both are Democrats who converted to conservative Republicanism.
They used to be Democrats but are now Republicans.
They are both Democrats who used to be Republicans.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Republicans used to defend any conceivable expression of executive privilege over Congress and the courts--now Democrats do that, while Republicans take up the old cry of imperial presidency.
Republicans and Democrats have switched positions.
Republicans are the only one to defend executive priviledge
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
The Republicans who hold real power keep Barr at a distance.
There are Republicans who hold real power.
Barr is one of the Republicans who hold real power.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Who else do the Republicans have?
They have themselves.
The Democrats have their support.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
But now that a Democratic president whom they despise has led the nation into war, GOP leaders have adopted the arguments of the counterculture.
Because of the war, GOP leaders side with the arguments of the counterculture.
GOP leaders look up to the Democratic president.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Though this version of libertarianism seems to flirt with anarchism, Boaz isn't worried about disarray.
Anarchism is associated with disarray.
Boaz is completely against anarchism.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Some House Republicans, including DeLay, have fired back at Bush, accusing him of betraying them, meddling in their business, and distorting their ideas.
DeLay disagreed with Bush.
DeLay said Bush had been supportive and understanding.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Democrats will point out that the president's party usually loses dozens of congressional seats in his sixth year.
In the sixth year of his term, the president's party loses seats in congress.
They note that president's typically gain seats during their sixth year.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
The Washington Post awards the GOP a clean win on an issue of prime importance to the American public but foresees an election-time brawl.
The GOP got a clean win, according to the Washington Post.
The GOP is a dirty party, says the Washington Post.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Time 's enthusiastic package echoes the familiar line about why Bush is the Republican The breadth of his support among blacks and Hispanics and his landslide re-election victory wowed the GOP.
Support from blacks and Hispanics made the GOP take notice.
Bush did not have the support of blacks nor Hispanics.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
The many parties who had already argued that a $1.
Many parties argue over a $1.
There is no evidence that $1 is enough.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
But they insist that they stand by the right to any other second-term abortion.
They are assertive in their support for any other second-term abortion.
They do not support abortion at all.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
No more than six members of the bipartisan board can be from any one political party.
Only six members of the board can be from one political party.
All members of the board are Republican.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Luntz is now advising Republicans to decry the IRS at every opportunity.
Luntz wants the Republicans to decry the IRA whenever they can.
Luntz doesn't advise anything against the IRS.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Democrats have done themselves a lot of harm by refusing to discriminate between those programs that are vital and those that are not.
Democrats refused to discriminate between programs, causing them harm.
The Democrats did not harm themselves.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
The Unabomber's neighbors said Kaczynski was hardly odd enough to worry We've got other ones around here that act a lot farther out than he ever was.
The Unabomber's neighbors said Kaczynski was hardly odd enough to worry
The Unabomber's neighbors said Kaczynski was odd enough to worry a lot
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
Now the conservative mantras are perjury is perjury and no man is above the law--and K finds himself tempted by the idea that it isn't the end of the world if a perjurer gets away with it.
Conservatives say perjury is perjury and no one can get away with it.
Democrats say perjury is perjury and no one can get away with it.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
right and they'll just pick crooked people again and then people the the wrong people will just fight their way up to the top again and it'll all be for nothing
There is no point because things will be the same again.
This time they will not pick crooked people.
{ "objective": { "paired": [ [ "anchor", "entailment" ] ], "self": [], "triplet": [ [ "anchor", "entailment", "contradiction" ] ] }, "topic": "Political parties" }
README.md exists but content is empty. Use the Edit dataset card button to edit it.
Downloads last month
5
Edit dataset card