With no explanation, label text_A→text_B with either "not_related" or "related".
text_A: Doctor Strange is a character in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
text_B: Electronic voting in Belgium started in 1991 when two locations were chosen to experiment on different electronic voting systems during the 24 November 1991 general elections .. electronic voting. electronic voting. 24 November 1991 general elections. Belgian general election, 1991. The law of 16 July 1991 to permit this experiment was passed by an absolute majority with no opposition at all .. One of the systems tested was based on a touch panel similar to those used in the Netherlands .. Netherlands. Netherlands. The other system , still in use in 2004 , is based on a magnetic card and an electronic ballot marking device with a light pen .. ballot marking device. ballot marking device. In 1994 the electronic voting experiment was extended to around 22 % of the Belgian population .. electronic voting. electronic voting. Every kind of voting area was tested  : big cities , small villages , French speaking , Dutch speaking or legally speaking both languages .. In 1999 the system was extended to 44 % of the population .. However , due to lobbying from groups like PourEva -LSB- 1 -RSB- and increasing doubt about the system , new tests were done and more controls were added .. The most important test is the introduction of optical reading of paper ballots in two areas .. This test was scheduled for 3 elections up to 2003 and was not re-conducted .. The test was successful and gave no problems , despite this being the first election to use it .. Optical reading of eVoting is Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail and guarantees the possibility of a human recount .. Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail. Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail. The extra control introduced is the creation of an expert committee to monitor the electronic election process .. That committee discovered the high dependency of the ministry of interior toward the vendor of the eVoting system .. In 2000 the local elections in Auderghem -LRB- part of Brussels -RRB- were contested in all available Belgian courts and the issue of legality of eVoting was raised before the European Court of Human Rights .. European Court of Human Rights. European Court of Human Rights. The European court discarded the request without analysing the content .. In 2003 a new eVoting system was introduced to try to convince citizens that the system was safe .. In the two locations that originally started eVoting , a `` Ticketing '' system was introduced .. The principle of this is to add a printer next to the voting machine -LRB- magnetic card and light pen -RRB- , and a paper copy of the vote is printed and approved by the voter .. Once the elections are finished , all the paper votes -LRB- tickets -RRB- are counted and compared to the electronic result .. In case of discrepancy , the paper version rules .. The paper count and the electronic count matched nowhere , and it was decided -LRB- against the law -RRB- to favour the electronic result , which was considered more reliable .. The law to organise this new test stated explicitly that this was for one election only .. In 2004 , for the European Elections , all the tests were ended and all 44 % of the population already voting electronically did so with the magnetic card .. Ticketing or Optical Reading were no longer used .. Since 1999 no further locations migrated from paper to eVoting .. The equipment acquired in 1994 was not supposed to be used in 2004 ; however , the government chose to use it for one more year .
not_related.