With no explanation, label text_A→text_B with either "not_related" or "related".
text_A: Shingles affects those over 65 at a lower rate.
text_B: DVD Copy Control Association , Inc. v. Bunner was a lawsuit that was filed by the DVD Copy Control Association -LRB- `` DVD CCA '' -RRB- in California , accusing Andrew Bunner and several others of misappropriation of trade secrets under California 's implementation of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act .. lawsuit. lawsuit. DVD Copy Control Association. DVD Copy Control Association. California. California. trade secrets. trade secrets. Uniform Trade Secrets Act. Uniform Trade Secrets Act. The case went through several rounds of appeals and was last heard and decided in February 2004 by the California Court of Appeal for the Sixth District .. California. California. California Court of Appeal for the Sixth District. California Court of Appeal#Sixth District. DVD CCA 's alleged trade secret was its `` content scramble system '' -LRB- CSS -RRB- .. The case was first heard in the Superior Court of California in Santa Clara County .. California. California. Superior Court of California in Santa Clara County. Santa Clara County Superior Court. The court initially found CSS to be a reasonably guarded trade secret and that its trade secret status should not be destroyed simply because it was posted on the Internet .. Internet. Internet. The preliminary injunction was granted to the plaintiff on January 20 , 2000 .. The defendants appealed to the California Court of Appeal , claiming that the lower court 's decision unnecessarily restrained Bunner 's First Amendment free speech rights .. California. California. First Amendment. First Amendment. The Appellate Court agreed with Bunner , which led to a further appeal by DVD CCA to the Supreme Court of California .. California. California. Supreme Court of California. Supreme Court of California. The Supreme Court of California held that although dissemination of computer code is protected free speech , the First Amendment does not prohibit courts from enjoining speech to protect a legitimate property right .. California. California. First Amendment. First Amendment. Supreme Court of California. Supreme Court of California. property right. property right. It found that the preliminary injunction did not violate the free speech clauses and remanded for the Appellate Court to `` make an independent examination of the entire record '' to determine whether there was misappropriation of trade secret .. Finally , on February 27 , 2004 , the California Court of Appeal for the Sixth District concluded that the CSS technology had lost its trade secret status .. California. California. California Court of Appeal for the Sixth District. California Court of Appeal#Sixth District. Therefore , the preliminary injunction burdened more speech than necessary .. The granting of the preliminary injunction was therefore reversed .
not_related.