Title: WHITE v. TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA
Citation: 11 Okla. 172, 1901 OK 50, 65 P. 83 5
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: July 6, 1901

WHITE v. TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA Annotate this Case WHITE v. TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA 1901 OK 50 65 P. 835 11 Okla. 172 Decided: 07/06/1901 Supreme Court of Oklahoma ED. WHITE v. THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. Appeal from the District Court of Noble County; before Bayard T. Hainer, Trial Judge. Syllabus ¶0 JUDGMENT--Not Disturbed When. In a criminal cause where the prisoner appeals from a judgment of conviction and no briefs are filed, or argument presented, this court will make an examination of the indictment, instructions excepted to, and judgment, and if no error is apparent, will affirm the case. Thos. H. Doyle, for appellant. J. C. Strang, Attorney General, for appellee. BURFORD, C. J.: ¶1 The plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court of Noble county for the crime of burglary in the second degree, and sentenced to servo a term of 5 years in the penitentiary. The judgment and sentence was entered on December 30, 1899. No brief has been filed and we are not advised what the plaintiff in error complains of, or relies upon for a reversal. In cases of this kind, we do not consider it the duty of this court to go into a careful examination of the evidence to determine whether or not the trial court erred in the admission or rejection of testimony. We have examined the indictment, the instructions of the court and the judgment and sentence, and we have discovered no error which will warrant a reversal of the judgment. ¶2 The judgment of the district court of Noble county is in all things affirmed, at the cost of the plaintiff in error. ¶3 Hainer, J., who presided in the court below, not sitting; all the other Justices concurring.