Title: NIDIFFER v. NIDIFFER.
Citation: 144 P. 35 0, 1914 OK 542, 44 Okla. 218
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: November 10, 1914

NIDIFFER v. NIDIFFER. Annotate this Case NIDIFFER v. NIDIFFER. 1914 OK 542 144 P. 350 44 Okla. 218 Case Number: 3868 Decided: 11/10/1914 Supreme Court of Oklahoma NIDIFFER v. NIDIFFER. Syllabus ¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Assignment of Error--Denial of New Trial. Errors alleged to have occurred during the progress of a trial cannot be considered by this court, unless the overruling of the motion for a new trial is assigned as error. Wm. P. Thompson, for plaintiff in error. W. H. Kornegay, for defendant in error. RITTENHOUSE, C. ¶1 This action was instituted in the district court of Ottawa county by Lucy Nidiffer against Robert Nidiffer for a divorce on the grounds of adultery and for alimony. Judgment was rendered in favor of Lucy Nidiffer for a divorce and $ 1,600 alimony, which sum was made a lien on the W. 1/2 of the S.W. 1/4 of section 5, township 26 N., range 23 E., I. M. Motion for a new trial was filed and overruled, and exceptions allowed. The action of the trial court in overruling the motion for a new trial is not assigned as error, and, as all the questions raised by the petition in error occurred during the progress of the trial, we cannot consider them, in the absence of an assignment of error based on the overruling of the motion for a new trial. Avery et al. v. Hays et al., ante, 144 P. 624. The cause should, therefore, be affirmed. ¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.