Title: Brown v. State
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 2004-MO-043
State: south-carolina
Issuer: south-carolina Supreme Court
Date: August 9, 2004

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Walter Ray Brown, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI Appeal From Charleston County Lee S. Alford, Trial Judge Deadra L. Jefferson, Post-Conviction Relief Judge Memorandum Opinion No. 2004-MO-043 Submitted January 22, 2004 - Filed August 9, 2004 DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED Tara Dawn Shurling, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, all of Columbia, for Respondent. ___________ PER CURIAM: Walter Brown (petitioner) asserts that his trial counsel (counsel) was ineffective for failing to adequately challenge the testimony of the State's primary witness during petitioner's trial for attempted first-degree burglary. After a full review of the record on appeal, we dismiss certiorari as improvidently granted. DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, BURNETT and PLEICONES, JJ., concur.