Title: Ruddell v. State
Citation: 2015 ND 78
Docket Number: 
State: north-dakota
Issuer: north-dakota Supreme Court
Date: April 1, 2015

Ruddell v. State Annotate this Case Court Description: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2015 ND 78 Byron Ruddell, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee No. 20140413 Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas E. Merrick, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Lee M. Grossman, 341 Central Avenue North, Suite 3, P.O. Box 475, Valley City, N.D. 58072, for petitioner and appellant; on brief. Frederick R. Fremgen, Assistant State's Attorney, 511 Second Avenue SE, Jamestown, N.D. 58401, for respondent and appellee; on brief. Ruddell v. StateNo. 20140413 Per Curiam. [¶1] Byron Ruddell appeals from a district court order denying him post-conviction relief. He argues the district court, without holding an evidentiary hearing, erred in summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief, because the court did not give all reasonable inferences in regard to his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). See Dunn v. State, 2006 ND 26, ¶ 12, 709 N.W.2d 1 (if a petitioner fails to raise a genuine issue of material fact, summary disposition will be appropriate). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Dale V. Sandstrom Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Carol Ronning Kapsner