Title: STONE v. ALBERTSON
Citation: 100 Okla. 254, 1924 OK 754, 229 P. 22 7
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: September 16, 1924

STONE v. ALBERTSON Annotate this Case STONE v. ALBERTSON 1924 OK 754 229 P. 227 100 Okla. 254 Case Number: 13468 Decided: 09/16/1924 Supreme Court of Oklahoma STONE v. ALBERTSON et al. Syllabus ¶0 Appeal and Error--Absence of Answer Brief--Reversal. Where the plaintiff in error has duly filed and served brief in compliance with the rule of the Supreme Court, and defendants in error have neither filed brief nor offered excuse for failure so to do, the Supreme Court will not search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment may be sustained; but where the brief filed appears reasonably to sustain any assignment of prejudicial error the judgment will be reversed. Commissioners' Opinion, Division No 2. Error from District Court, Creek County; John L. Norman, Judge. Action by Van H. Albertson et al. against A. H. Stone. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error. Reversed. Cheatham, Beaver & Johnston, for plaintiff in error. JARMAN, C. ¶1 This is an appeal from the district court of Creek county. The plaintiff in error filed brief December 20, 1922. No brief has been filed by the defendants in error and no extension of time has been given to file same and no reason has been assigned by the defendants in error as to why they have not tiled brief. The brief of the plaintiff in error appears to reasonably sustain the assignments of error, and under the rule of this court, the record will not be searched to find some theory upon which the judgment of the lower court may be sustained. ¶2 The judgment of the lower court is reversed.