Title: State v. Markel
Citation: 2004 ND 103, 688 N.W.2d 402
Docket Number: 
State: north-dakota
Issuer: north-dakota Supreme Court
Date: June 3, 2004

State v. Markel Annotate this Case Filed June 3, 2004 IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2004 ND 103 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Douglas Loren Markel, Defendant and Appellant No. 20030299 Appeal from the District Court of Richland County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Richard W. Grosz, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Arthur Warren Stokes (on brief), State's Attorney, 413 3rd Avenue North, Wahpeton, N.D. 58075, for plaintiff and appellee. Henry H. Howe, Howe & Seaworth, 421 DeMers Avenue, Grand Forks, N.D. 58201, for defendant and appellant. State v. Markel No. 20030299 Per Curiam. [¶1] Douglas L. Markel appealed from a criminal judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of class B felony possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver in violation of N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-23(1)(b). On appeal, Markel argues the district court erred in admitting an exhibit in evidence and in allowing a witness to testify as an expert. Markel also argues the evidence was insufficient to establish that he possessed the controlled substance with intent to deliver. We affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4). [¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Carol Ronning Kapsner Dale V. Sandstrom William A. Neumann Mary Muehlen Maring