Title: Johnson v. City of Jamestown
Citation: 2023 ND 87
Docket Number: 20220283
State: north-dakota
Issuer: north-dakota Supreme Court
Date: May 9, 2023

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2023 ND 87 Timothy A. Johnson, Plaintiff and Appellant v. City of Jamestown, a Municipality in the State of North Dakota, Defendant and Appellee No. 20220283 Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Cherie L. Clark, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Timothy C. Lamb, Grand Forks, N.D., for plaintiff and appellant. Brian D. Schmidt (argued) and Scott K. Porsborg (on brief), Bismarck, N.D., for defendant and appellee. FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT MAY 9, 2023 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 1 Johnson v. City of Jamestown No. 20220283 Per Curiam. [¶1] Timothy Johnson appeals from a judgment dismissing his personal injury action against the City of Jamestown entered after a jury found he did not sustain a serious injury as a result of a motor vehicle collision with a City- owned vehicle. Johnson argues the district court erred in admitting and excluding evidence, the district court judge should have recused herself, and his due process rights were violated. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting and excluding evidence and Johnson is precluded from raising the recusal and due process issues for failure to raise them in the district court. Franciere v. City of Mandan, 2020 ND 143, ¶ 24, 945 N.W.2d 251 (“Because alleged judicial bias was not raised in the district court, we will not address it for the first time on appeal.”); Matter of Didier, 2019 ND 263, ¶ 11, 934 N.W.2d 417 (concluding that appellant’s failure to raise constitutional due process issue in the district court was sufficient for this Court to decline review on appeal). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr