Title: Julianne M. Holt, etc. v. Michael Edward Keetley, et al.
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: SC18-1171
State: Florida
Issuer: Florida Supreme Court
Date: September 5, 2019

Supreme Court of Florida 
 
 
____________ 
 
No. SC18-1171 
____________ 
 
JULIANNE M. HOLT, etc., 
Petitioner, 
 
vs. 
 
MICHAEL EDWARD KEETLEY, et al., 
Respondents. 
 
September 5, 2019 
 
PER CURIAM. 
 
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Holt v. Keetley, 250 So. 3d 206 
(Fla. 2d DCA 2018), based on express and direct conflict with a decision of 
another district court of appeal and on the ground that the decision expressly 
affects a class of constitutional officers.  See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. 
 
Upon further consideration, we conclude that this matter is moot, and we 
exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction.  Accordingly, this review 
proceeding is hereby dismissed. 
 
It is so ordered. 
CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, LAGOA, LUCK, and 
MUÑIZ, JJ., concur. 
 
- 2 - 
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. 
 
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal – 
Constitutional Construction/Direct Conflict of Decisions 
 
Second District - Case No. 2D17-2157 
 
(Hillsborough County) 
 
Julianne M. Holt, Public Defender, and Jennifer Spradley, Assistant Public 
Defender, Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, Tampa, Florida, 
 
 
for Petitioner 
 
Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Caroline Johnson Levine, Assistant Attorney 
General, Amit Agarwal, Solicitor General, Edward M. Wenger, Chief Deputy 
Solicitor General, and Christopher J. Baum, Deputy Solicitor General, Tallahassee, 
Florida, 
 
 
for Respondent State of Florida 
 
Lyann Goudie of Goudie & Kohn, P.A., Tampa, Florida, 
 
 
for Respondent Michael Edward Keetley