Title: Four Hills Community, LLC v. Tucker (Unpublished Opinion)
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: S-1-SC-39821
State: new-mexico
Issuer: new-mexico Supreme Court
Date: June 17, 2024

This decision of the Supreme Court of New Mexico was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Supreme Court. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Filing Date: June 17, 2024 No. S-1-SC-39821 FOUR HILLS COMMUNITY, LLC d/b/a FOUR HILLS PRIVATE COMMUNITY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SHERRY LYNN TUCKER, Defendant-Appellant, and GLORIA H. NOVAK, Defendant. CERTIFICATION FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS Joshua A. Allison, District Judge Sherry L. Tucker Pro se Edgewood, NM for Appellant Vance, Chavez & Associates, LLC James A. Chavez Albuquerque, NM for Appellee DISPOSITIONAL ORDER OF REMAND PER CURIAM. {1} WHEREAS, this matter came on for consideration by the Court upon certification order from the Court of Appeals, and the Court having considered the foregoing order and being sufficiently advised, on March 27, 2023, held this matter in abeyance pending this Court’s disposition in Padilla v. Torres, No. S-1-SC-35619, without deciding whether to accept certification; {2} WHEREAS, this Court issued an opinion in Padilla on February 5, 2024, reversing and remanding that matter to the metropolitan court for a new trial, see Padilla v. Torres, 2024-NMSC-007, ¶ 2, ___ P.3d ___; {3} WHEREAS, the Court concludes that the certified question presented in this matter is addressed by the Court’s opinion in Padilla; {4} WHEREAS, the Court, therefore, exercises its discretion under Rule 12-405(B) NMRA to dispose of this matter by nonprecedential order; and {5} WHEREAS, the Court having considered the foregoing and being sufficiently advised; {6} NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Court’s March 27, 2023, order holding this matter in abeyance is WITHDRAWN; {7} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that certification is ACCEPTED; and {8} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is remanded to the metropolitan court for a new trial in accordance with Padilla. {9} IT IS SO ORDERED. WE CONCUR: DAVID K. THOMSON, Chief Justice MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Justice C. SHANNON BACON, Justice JULIE J. VARGAS, Justice BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Justice