Title: IN RE VIA'S ESTATE
Citation: 1956 OK 106, 295 P.2d 779
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: March 27, 1956

IN RE VIA'S ESTATE Annotate this Case IN RE VIA'S ESTATE 1956 OK 106 295 P.2d 779 Case Number: 36889 Decided: 03/27/1956 Supreme Court of Oklahoma IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT W. VIA, AN INCOMPETENT AND PHYSICALLY IMPAIRED PERSON. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, L.P. GOODE AND M.E. BROSS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. ROBERT W. VIA, AN INCOMPETENT, AND ERNEST V. KEITH, GUARDIAN OF ROBERT W. VIA, AN INCOMPETENT, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR. Syllabus by the Court. ¶0 A modification and repealing clause of an Act of the Legislature which provides that certain sections of our statutes which are in conflict with, or inconsistent with the provisions of the new Act are hereby modified or repealed as may be necessary to make the new Act effective, does not repeal the sections of statutes which are not in conflict or inconsistent with the new Act. Proceedings by Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Company, on behalf of itself, L.P. Goode and M.E. Bross, seeking to set aside the appointment of Rubye Via and Ernest V. Keith as guardians of Robert W. Via, alleged incompetent, from order of District Court sustaining guardian's demurrer to the motion to dismiss the order appointing guardians, said Railroad Company appeals. Affirmed. Appeal from the District Court of Seminole County; Bob Howell, Judge. Loyd Benefield, Savage, Gibson, Benefield & Shelton, Oklahoma City, for plaintiffs in error. Rollie D. Thedford, Oklahoma City, James E. Driscoll, Seminole, Mike Tapp, Oklahoma City, for defendants in error. PER CURIAM. ¶1 This appeal is from an order of the District Court of Seminole County sustaining the demurrer to defendants in error, hereinafter referred to as guardians, to the motion to dismiss the order appointing guardians, filed by plaintiffs in error, hereinafter referred to as movants. ¶2 Briefly stated, the facts are as follows: Robert W. Via, an employee of Chicago, Rock Island Railroad Company, sustained an accidental personal injury on March 4, 1953. A full settlement was reached between Via and said company and Via executed his full release of the company from any further liability. Approximately ten months after execution of said release the county court of Seminole County, upon the petition of the wife of Via adjudged him to be an incompetent person and appointed his said wife as guardian of his person and estate. On June 17, 1954, one Ernest V. Keith was substituted as guardian for said incompetent, and on said date was authorized by the county court to bring an action on behalf of said incompetent against movants to recover damages growing out of the March 4th accident to Via. On June 28, 1954, such action was instituted in the Superior Court of Seminole County. On August 6, 1954, movants filed in the county court their motion to set aside the appointments of said guardians. On October 8, 1954, the county court entered its order denying the motion. Appeal was perfected from said order to the District Court of Seminole County and on January 11, 1955, after hearing was had, the District Court entered its order sustaining guardians' demurrer to movants motion to dismiss the order appointing guardians. ¶3 It is contended by plaintiffs in error that the county court's order appointing Rubye Via as guardian of Robert W. Via, and the order appointing Ernest V. Keith as her successor, is void for the reason that said court did not have jurisdiction to enter such orders. This contention is predicated upon their argument that "Modification and Repealing Clause. 43A Oklahoma Statutes 1951, Sections 1 through 41, Sections 102 through 111, Sections 151 through 156, Sections 201 through 225, Sections 251 through 261, Sections 301, 311, 321, 331, and 361, and 58 Oklahoma Statutes 1951 Sections 851 through 855, inclusive, and all other Acts or parts of Acts which are in conflict with or inconsistent with the provisions of this Act are hereby modified or repealed as may be necessary to make this Act effective." ¶4 It has not been pointed out to us or do we find that Sections 851 [58-851] [58-855] through 855 of 58 O.S. 1951 are in conflict or inconsistent with the Mental Health Act of 1953. The Sections in question have been neither modified nor repealed for they in no way interfere with the effectiveness of the new Act. See 82 C.J.S., Statutes §§ 285, 291. ¶5 The judgment of the trial court in sustaining the demurrer is affirmed. The Court acknowledges the aid of the Supreme Court Commissioners in the preparation of this opinion. After a tentative opinion was written by Commissioner JEAN R. REED and approved by Commissioners JAMES H. NEASE and J.W. CRAWFORD, the cause was assigned to a Justice of this Court for examination and report to the court. Thereafter, upon report and consideration in conference, the foregoing opinion was adopted by the Court.