Title: SPECKMAN & OSENBAUGH v. OKLAHOMA SALVAGE & SUPPLY CO.
Citation: 122 Okla. 260, 1927 OK 63, 254 P. 71 6
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: March 15, 1927

SPECKMAN & OSENBAUGH v. OKLAHOMA SALVAGE & SUPPLY CO. Annotate this Case SPECKMAN & OSENBAUGH v. OKLAHOMA SALVAGE & SUPPLY CO. 1927 OK 63 254 P. 716 122 Okla. 260 Case Number: 17461 Decided: 03/15/1927 Supreme Court of Oklahoma SPECKMAN & OSENBAUGH v. OKLAHOMA SALVAGE & SUPPLY CO. Syllabus ¶0 Appeal and Error--Reversal for Failure to File Answer Brief. Where plaintiff in error has served and filed its brief in compliance with the rules of this court, and the defendant in error has neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse for his failure to do so, this court is not required to search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment of the trial court may be sustained but may, where the authorities cited in the brief filed, appear reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, reverse the cause, with directions, in accordance with the prayer of the petition in error. E. F. Maley, for plaintiff in error. A. L. Maley, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. ¶1 This is an appeal from the judgment of the superior court of Okmulgee county. The plaintiff in error, in due time, filed its brief in compliance with the rules of this court, but the defendant in error has wholly failed to file any brief, pleadings, or other instrument in said cause on appeal, and has offered no excuse for its failure to do so. In the case of City National Bank v. Coatney,