Title: Ayers v. State
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 13, 2004
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: May 4, 2004

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
BRANDON AYERS, 
 
 
Defendant Below- 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
STATE OF DELAWARE, 
 
Plaintiff Below- 
Appellee. 
§ 
§ 
§  No. 13, 2004 
§ 
§  Court Below—Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware, 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§  Cr.A. No. IN00-05-0167 thru  
§    -0170 
§  Cr. ID. 0004013377  
§   
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: March 30, 2004 
 
 
 
 
  Decided: May 4, 2004 
 
Before HOLLAND, BERGER, and JACOBS, Justices. 
 
O R D E R 
 
This fourth day of May 2004, after careful consideration of the 
appellant’s opening brief and the State’s motion to affirm, we find it 
manifest that the judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the 
basis of the Superior Court’s well-reasoned decision dated December 17, 
2003.  The Superior Court did not err in concluding that the claims raised in 
Ayers’ second motion for postconviction relief were either repetitive or 
previously adjudicated under Superior Court Criminal Rules 61(i)(2) and 
(i)(4) and that Ayers’ had failed to overcome these procedural hurdles. 
 
2
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the State’s motion to 
affirm is GRANTED.  The judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Randy J. Holland 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice