Title: Eric Edenfield v. State of Florida
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: SC10-2146
State: Florida
Issuer: Florida Supreme Court
Date: March 15, 2012

Supreme Court of Florida 
 
 
_____________ 
 
No. SC10-2146 
_____________ 
 
ERIC EDENFIELD, 
Petitioner, 
 
vs. 
 
STATE OF FLORIDA, 
Respondent. 
 
 
[March 15, 2012] 
 
 
PER CURIAM. 
 
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the First District 
Court of Appeal in Edenfield v. State, 45 So. 3d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), based on 
express and direct conflict.  See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.  Upon further 
consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted.  
Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding. 
 
It is so ordered. 
CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, 
and PERRY, JJ., concur. 
 
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. 
 
 
- 2 - 
 
 
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Direct 
Conflict of Decisions 
 
 
First District - Case No. 1D09-6554 
 
 
(Duval County) 
 
Susan Z. Cohen and David M. Robbins of Epstein and Robbins, Jacksonville, 
Florida, 
 
 
for Petitioner 
 
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Joshua 
Ryan Heller, and Thomas D. Winokur, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, 
Florida, 
 
 
for Respondent 
 
Sonya Rudenstine, Gainesville, Florida, Michael Robert Ufferman, Tallahassee, 
Florida, and David Oscar Markus, Miami, Florida, on behalf of the Florida 
Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the National Association of Criminal 
Defense Lawyers, and the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, 
 
 
as Amicus Curiae