Title: Allen Silas v. State
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: SC95-754
State: Florida
Issuer: Florida Supreme Court
Date: April 12, 2001

Supreme Court of Florida
  
CORRECTED OPINION
____________
No. SC95754
____________
ALLEN SILAS,
Petitioner,
vs.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
[March 15, 2001]
LEWIS, J.
We have for review State v. Gitto, 731 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), in
which the petitioner, Allen Silas, was one of several appellees below.  The
reasoning applied by the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Gitto was expressly
disapproved in State v. Warner, 762 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 2000).  Therefore, the
decision of the appellate court is quashed, and the case is remanded for
consideration and determination in accordance with the principles announced in
Warner.
It is so ordered.
-2-
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.
QUINCE, J., concurs in result only.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND
IF FILED, DETERMINED.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - 
Direct Conflict
Fifth District - Case No. 5D97-1376
(Seminole County)
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Michele A. Lucas, Assistant Public
Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, Florida,
for Petitioner
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Belle B. Schumann, Assistant
Attorney General, Daytona Beach, Florida, 
for Respondent