Title: Waslaski v. State
Citation: 2012 ND 232
Docket Number: 
State: north-dakota
Issuer: north-dakota Supreme Court
Date: November 27, 2012

Waslaski v. State Annotate this Case Court Description: Order summarily dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2012 ND 232 Edward Waslaski Jr., Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee Nos. 20120291, 20120292 & 20120293 Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Douglas R. Herman, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Benjamin C. Pulkrabek (on brief), 402 1st St. NW, Mandan, N.D. 58554-3118, for petitioner and appellant. Leah J. Viste (on brief), Assistant State's Attorney, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee. Waslaski v. StateNos. 20120291-20120293 Per Curiam. [¶1] Edward Waslaski, Jr., appealed from a trial court order summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Waslaski argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel and the trial court failed to advise him of his rights under N.D.R.Crim.P. 11(b). [¶2] We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7); see Ude v. State, 2009 ND 71, ¶ 12, 764 N.W.2d 419 (stating a petitioner is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his application for post-conviction relief if he fails to provide any competent evidence to raise a genuine issue of material fact). [¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Mary Muehlen Maring Daniel J. Crothers Dale V. Sandstrom Carol Ronning Kapsner