Title: EGGLESTON v. SINCLAIR OIL & GAS CO.
Citation: 132 Okla. 84, 1928 OK 356, 269 P. 35 6
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: May 29, 1928

EGGLESTON v. SINCLAIR OIL & GAS CO. Annotate this Case EGGLESTON v. SINCLAIR OIL & GAS CO. 1928 OK 356 269 P. 356 132 Okla. 84 Case Number: 18376 Decided: 05/29/1928 Supreme Court of Oklahoma EGGLESTON v. SINCLAIR OIL & GAS CO. et al. Syllabus ¶0 Oil and Gas--Instrument Construed as Lease Forfeited by Abandonment. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed upon the authority of case No. 18375, Thomas L. Eggleston, Sr., v. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co., Garfield Oil Co., Laura Crews et al., this day decided ( 132 Okla. 81 , 269 P. 306). Error from District Court, Garfield County; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action by Thomas L. Eggleston, Sr., against the Sinclair Oil & Gas Company et al. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error. Affirmed. Snyder, Owen & Lybrand, for plaintiff in error. Edw. H. Chandler, Wm. O. Beall, Thos. J. Hanlon, Summers Hardy, Robert L. Imler, and W. W. Sutton, for defendants in error. LESTER, J. ¶1 The identical question here presented was involved in No. 18375, Thomas L. Eggleston, Sr., v. Sinclair Oil & Gas Company et al., this day decided by this court ( 132 Okla. 81 , 269 P. 306), and by stipulation of the parties, this case was submitted on the same briefs and oral argument.