Title: State v. VanDyke
Citation: 2012 ND 190
Docket Number: 
State: north-dakota
Issuer: north-dakota Supreme Court
Date: September 25, 2012

State v. VanDyke Annotate this Case Court Description: Criminal judgment for gross sexual imposition is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2012 ND 190 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Ned D. VanDyke, Defendant and Appellant No. 20110325 Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Frank L. Racek, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Reid A. Brady (on brief) and Ryan J. Younggren (on brief), Assistant State's Attorneys, Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, ND 58108-2806, for plaintiff and appellee. Monty G. Mertz (on brief) and Christopher S. Joseph (on brief), third-year law student, under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, Fargo Public Defender Office, 912 Third Avenue South, Fargo, ND 58103-1707, for defendant and appellant. State v. VanDykeNo. 20110325 Per Curiam. [¶1] Ned VanDyke appeals from a criminal judgment after a jury found him guilty on three counts of gross sexual imposition. On appeal, VanDyke argues the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to sustain the guilty verdicts. We conclude sufficient evidence exists to support the verdicts. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Carol Ronning Kapsner Dale V. Sandstrom Daniel J. Crothers Mary Muehlen Maring