Title: FRANK HAROLD WEBER v. THE STATE OF WYOMING
Citation: 2010 WY 19, 225 P.3d 515
Docket Number: 
State: Wyoming
Issuer: Wyoming Supreme Court
Date: February 24, 2010

FRANK HAROLD WEBER v. THE STATE OF WYOMING Annotate this Case FRANK HAROLD WEBER v. THE STATE OF WYOMING 2010 WY 19 225 P.3d 515 Case Number: No. S-09-0150 Decided: 02/24/2010 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2009 FRANK HAROLD WEBER, Appellant (Defendant), v. THE STATE OF WYOMING, Appellee (Plaintiff). Appeal from the District Court of Fremont County The Honorable Norman E. Young, Judge Representing Appellant: Diane M. Lozano, State Public Defender; Tina N. Kerin, Appellate Counsel. Argument by Ms. Kerin. Representing Appellee: Bruce A Salzburg, Wyoming Attorney General; Terry L. Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Leda M. Pojman, Senior Assistant Attorney General. Argument by Ms. Pojman. Before VOIGT, C.J., and GOLDEN, HILL, KITE, and BURKE, JJ. VOIGT, Chief Justice. [¶1] The State conceded at oral argument that this case must be remanded to the district court for the purpose of allowing the appellant to withdraw his conditional no contest plea, and to plead anew. A conditional plea under W.R.Cr.P. 11(a)(2) may not be utilized to reserve argument on non-dispositive matters. Walters v. State, 2008 WY 159, ¶¶ 16-23, 197 P.3d 1273 , 1278-79 (Wyo. 2008). The appellant's motion seeking to prevent the admission of uncharged misconduct evidence under W.R.E. 404(b) was not a dispositive motion. We will not resolve other issues raised by the appellant because such issues may not survive in their current form, making any such resolution advisory in nature. [¶2] Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.