Title: Hudson's Bay Company Luxembourg, v. JZ LLC and AGZ LLC
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 182, 2013
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: November 1, 2013

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
HUDSON’S BAY COMPANY
§
LUXEMBOURG, S.A.R.L.,
§
§
No. 182, 2013
Plaintiff Below,
§
Appellant,
§
Court Below: 
 
§
v.
§
Superior Court of the
§
State of Delaware, in and for 
JZ LLC and AGZ LLC,
§
New Castle County
§
Defendants Below,
§
C.A. No. N10C-12-107 
Appellees.
§
Submitted:  October 23, 2013
Decided:  November 1, 2013
Before HOLLAND, BERGER, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices and NOBLE,
Vice Chancellor,*constituting the Court en Banc.
O R D E R
On consideration of the parties’ briefs and oral arguments, this Court affirms,
in part, the Superior Court’s  judgment in favor of appellees, JZ LLC and AGZ LLC,
on the basis of its March 11, 2013 Memorandum Opinion.  Specifically, this Court
affirms the trial court’s reasoning and holding that unintentional and immaterial
errors in appellant’s financial statements do not constitute a breach of warranty or
misrepresentation under the operative Securities Purchase Agreement.  Having
affirmed on the basis of the trial court’s first holding, this Court does not reach the
* Sitting by designation pursuant to art. IV, § 12 of the Delaware Constitution and Supreme Court
Rules 2 and 4 (a) to fill up the quorum as required.
alternative holding regarding damages.
It appears to this Court that an issue concerning attorneys’ fees remains
unresolved.  Accordingly, we remand for the trial court’s consideration of this issue. 
Jurisdiction is not retained.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Carolyn Berger
Justice
2