Title: Miller v. State
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 25, 2003
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: March 17, 2003

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
THOMAS R. MILLER, 
 
 
Defendant Below- 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
STATE OF DELAWARE, 
 
Plaintiff Below- 
Appellee. 
§ 
§ 
§  No. 25, 2003 
§ 
§  Court Below—Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware, 
§  in and for Sussex County 
§  Cr.A. Nos. 92-12-0044 and -0045
§  Cr. ID. 92S05488DI 
§   
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: March 4, 2003 
 
 
 
 
  Decided: March 17, 2003 
 
Before HOLLAND, BERGER, and STEELE, Justices. 
 
O R D E R 
 
This 17th day of March 2003, after careful consideration of the opening brief 
and the State’s motion to affirm, we find it manifest that the judgment below 
should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court=s well-reasoned decision 
dated January 9, 2003.  The Superior Court did not err in concluding that Miller’s 
motion for postconviction relief was time-barred under Superior Court Criminal 
Rule 61(i)(1) and that Miller had failed to overcome this procedural hurdle.  
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 
Court is AFFIRMED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Carolyn Berger 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice