Title: FIRST NAT. BANK OF OKEMAH v. BALDWIN
Citation: 127 P. 26 0, 1912 OK 624, 34 Okla. 825
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: October 15, 1912

FIRST NAT. BANK OF OKEMAH v. BALDWIN Annotate this Case FIRST NAT. BANK OF OKEMAH v. BALDWIN 1912 OK 624 127 P. 260 34 Okla. 825 Case Number: 2206 Decided: 10/15/1912 Supreme Court of Oklahoma FIRST NAT. BANK OF OKEMAH v. BALDWIN. Syllabus ¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Failure to File Brief--Dismissal. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. C. B. Conners and W. A. Huser, for plaintiff in error. Patterson & Brewer, for defendant in error. ROBERTSON, C. ¶1 This appeal was filed in this court December 22, 1910. Neither party has filed a brief, nor has there been any excuse offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should, therefore, be dismissd for want of prosecution, under rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi). Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290 , 111 P. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779 , 117 P. 200; Bender v. Bender et al., 30 Okla. 288 , 119 P. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296 , 119 P. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287 , 119 P. 205. ¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.