Title: Huntley et al. v. B & R 1105, LLC
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 296, 2009
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: September 10, 2009

1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
DONALD W. HUNTLEY and 
HUNTLEY & ASSOCIATES, LLC,  
 
Defendants Below- 
Appellants, 
 
v. 
 
B & R 1105, LLC, a Delaware 
limited liability company, 
 
Plaintiff Below- 
Appellee. 
§ 
§  No. 296, 2009 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below─Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§  C.A. No. 07C-05-207 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: September 4, 2009 
 
 
 
 
   Decided: September 10, 2009 
 
 
 
 
 
 
O R D E R  
 
 
This 10th day of September 2009, it appears to the Court that, on 
August 25, 2009, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal 
should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the 
appellants’ failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by not filing the 
opening brief and appendix in this matter.  The appellants have failed to 
respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period.  
Therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.1 
                                                 
1 Appellant Huntley is a Delaware lawyer.  Huntley was sent delinquency letters on July 
21, 2009, August 5, 2009, and August 13, 2009.  A notice to show cause for performance 
deficiency also was issued on August 13, 2009.  On August 14, 2009, the Court granted 
Huntley’s out-of-time motion for an extension of time to file the opening brief.  In its 
 
2
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court 
Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Randy J. Holland 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice 
 
                                                                                                                                                 
Order, the Court stated that, if the opening brief were not filed in a timely manner, a 
notice to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed would be issued.