Title: CITY OF MANGUM v. TODD
Citation: 175 P. 19 7, 1918 OK 497, 71 Okla. 59
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: August 27, 1918

CITY OF MANGUM v. TODD Annotate this Case CITY OF MANGUM v. TODD 1918 OK 497 175 P. 197 71 Okla. 59 Case Number: 9837 Decided: 08/27/1918 Supreme Court of Oklahoma CITY OF MANGUM v. TODD. Syllabus ¶0 Appeal and Error--Dismissal--Attestation and Filing--Case-Made. Motion to dismiss appeal sustained for the reasons stated in the opinion. Error from District Court, Greer County; Thomas A. Edwards, Judge. Action between the City of Mangum and Jarrett Todd. Judgment for the latter, and the former brings error. Dismissed. H. H. Edwards, for plaintiff in error. H. D. Henry, in pro per. KANE, J. ¶1 This cause comes on to be heard upon motion to dismiss appeal upon the following grounds: (1) Because said case-made was not attested by the clerk of the court and the seal of the court thereto attached as required by the order of the court and by section 5242, Revised Laws 1910, as amended by the act approved March 21, 1917 Session Laws 1917, p. 401, c. 218). (2) Because said case-made was not filed with the papers in said case as required by section 5242 Revised Laws 1910, as amended by the act approved March 21, 1917 (Session Laws 1917, p. 401). ¶2 This motion is accompanied by a brief containing the citation of authorities which seem to sustain the grounds for dismissal stated therein. As there is no response on the part of counsel for plaintiff in error, and the authorities cited seem to be in point, the motion to dismiss appeal will be sustained.