Title: Ann Elliot Barber v. State of Florida
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: SC01-1006
State: Florida
Issuer: Florida Supreme Court
Date: October 10, 2002

Supreme 
Court 
of 
Florida
____________
Nos. SC01-1006, SC01-1007
____________
ANN ELLIOT BARBER,
Petitioner,
vs.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
[October 10, 2002]
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Barber v. State, 781 So. 2d 425
(Fla. 5th DCA 2001), and State v. Barber, 783 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001),
based on misapplication of this Court's opinion in State v. Norris, 168 So. 2d 541,
543 (Fla. 1964), and express and direct conflict with Smith v. State, 700 So. 2d
446, 446-47 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), Audano v. State, 641 So. 2d 1356, 1358-59 (Fla.
2d DCA 1994), Dibble v. State, 347 So. 2d 1096, 1097 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977),
Malcolm v. State, 415 So. 2d 891, 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), and Smith v. State,
-2-
743 So. 2d 141, 143 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).  Upon reflection and further
consideration, we now conclude that review was improvidently granted. 
Accordingly, these review proceedings are dismissed.
It is so ordered.
ANSTEAD, C.J., SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., and
HARDING, Senior Justice, concur.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
Two Applications for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal -
Direct Conflict
Fifth District - Case Nos. 5D00-2797 & 5D99-218
(Brevard County)
Robert R. Berry and Gregory W. Eisenmenger of Eisenmenger & Berry, P.A.,
Melbourne, Florida,
for Petitioner
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Pamela J. Koller and Ann M.
Phillips, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, Florida,
for Respondent