Title: LOVE v. STATE ELECTION BD.
Citation: 170 P.2d 193, 1946 OK 160, 197 Okla. 157
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: May 17, 1946

LOVE v. STATE ELECTION BD. Annotate this Case SNOW v. FRYE 1912 OK 651 127 P. 422 34 Okla. 826 Case Number: 2231 Decided: 10/15/1912 Supreme Court of Oklahoma SNOW et al. v. FRYE et al. Syllabus ¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Failure to File Briefs--Dismissal. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Robert E. Jackson, for plaintiffs in error. Curtis & Moore, for defendants in error. ROBERTSON, C. ¶1 This appeal was filed January 3, 1911. Plaintiffs in error have filed no brief, nor has any excuse been offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should, therefore, be dismissd for want of prosecution under rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi) of this court. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290 , 111 P. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779 , 117 P. 200; Bender v. Bender et al., 30 Okla. 288 , 119 P. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296 , 119 P. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287 , 119 P. 205. ¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.