Title: In Re Cox Radio, Inc. Shareholders Litigation/Dixon et al. v. George Leon, et al. v. Cox Radio, et al.
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 338, 2010
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: November 22, 2010

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN RE COX RADIO, INC.
§
SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION
§
______________________________ §
DONALD DIXON and JOHN F.
§
BRADLEY,
§
§  No. 338, 2010
Objectors Below,
§
Appellants,
§
§  Court Below:  
     v.
§  Court of Chancery  
§  of the State of Delaware
GEORGE LEON, as Trustee for the
§
George Leon Family Trust, and 
§  C.A. No. 4461
CORAL SPRINGS POLICE 
§
PENSION FUND,
§
§
Plaintiffs Below, 
§
Appellees,
§
§
     v.
§ 
§ 
COX RADIO, INC., COX
§
ENTERPRISES, INC., COX MEDIA §  
GROUP, INC., PAUL M. HUGHES, §
JAMES C. KENNEDY, JUANITA
§
P. BARANCO, G. DENNIS BERRY, §
NICK W. EVANS, JIMMY W. 
§
HAYES, MARC W. MORGAN, 
§
ROBERT F. NEILL and
§
NICHOLAS D. TRIGONY,
§
§
Defendants Below,
§
Appellees.
§
Submitted:  November 17, 2010
Decided:  November 22, 2010
Before HOLLAND, BERGER and RIDGELY, Justices.
1Cf.  Kahn v. Lynch Communication Systems, Inc., 638 A.2d 1110 (Del. 1994); In Re Pure
Resources, Inc. S’holders Litig., 808 A.2d 421 (Del. Ch. 2002).
2
O R D E R
This 22nd day of November 2010, on consideration of the briefs and arguments
of the parties, the Court has concluded that this matter should be affirmed on the basis
of and for the reasons assigned by the Court of Chancery in its Memorandum Opinion
dated May 6, 2010.  The Court of Chancery concluded that, even if the transactions
at issue were subjected to the entire fairness standard of review, the proposed
settlement should be approved.1 .  Accordingly, we need not and do not express any
view as to the proper standard by which the underlying transactions should be
reviewed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the
Chancery Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Carolyn Berger
Justice