Title: SMITH v. WALLACE
Citation: 1950 OK 80, 202 Okla. 577, 216 P.2d 287
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: March 28, 1950

SMITH v. WALLACE Annotate this Case SMITH v. WALLACE 1950 OK 80 216 P.2d 287 202 Okla. 577 Case Number: 34479 Decided: 03/28/1950 Supreme Court of Oklahoma Syllabus ¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR - Rime for appeal from action of district court n refusing to discharge receiver. In order to review the action of the district court in refusing to discharge a receiver, the petition in error must be filed in this court within thirty days, as provided by 12 O.S. 1941 § 1558. Charles E. Grounds, E. Keith Cooper, Seminole, for plaintiff in error. Allen G. Nichols, Walter Billingsley, Wewoka, for defendant in error. HALLEY, J. ¶1 Plaintiff commenced an action to foreclose a chattel mortgage, and a receiver was appointed to take possession of the property. On July 14, 1949, the trial court overruled an application to vacate the appointment of the receiver. The appeal from this order was filed in this court December 22, 1949. ¶2 A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the appeal was not filed within the period prescribed by 12 O.S. 1941 § 1558. The motion must be sustained. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co. v. Dobbins, 178 Okl. 629, 63 P.2d 968 ; Grant Drilling Co. v. Robold, 181 Okl. 479, 75 P.2d 172 ; Lamb v. Alexander, 45 Okl. 573, 146 P. 443; Skelly Oil Co. v. Globe Oil Co. et al., 87 Okl. 225, 209 P. 321. In Skelly Oil Co. v. Globe Oil Co. et al., supra, we stated: 'In order to review the action of the district court in refusing to discharge a receiver, the petition in error must be filed in this court within 10 days, as provided in section 4986, Rev.Laws 1910.' ¶3 Since then the statute involved has been amended to provide for an appeal within thirty days. ¶4 There is nothing in McGrath v. Clift, 198 Okl. 644, 181 P.2d 555 , contrary to the above announced rule. The appeal here is directly from the order overruling the application to vacate and can only be taken under the provisions of the above statute. ¶5 Appeal dismissed.