Title: LIPPENCOTT v. HERRING
Citation: 100 P.2d 893, 187 Okla. 10, 1940 OK 156
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: March 26, 1940

LIPPENCOTT v. HERRING Annotate this Case LIPPENCOTT v. HERRING 1940 OK 156 100 P.2d 893 187 Okla. 10 Case Number: 28218 Decided: 03/26/1940 Supreme Court of Oklahoma LIPPENCOTT v. HERRING Syllabus ¶0 JURY--APPEAL AND ERROR--Right to jury trial in action to recover money where amount due is in issue--Syllabus adopted. The syllabus in cause No. 28217 is adopted as the syllabus herein. Appeal from District Court, Roger Mills County; W. P. Keen, Judge. Action by F. E. Herring against C. E. Lippencott for money judgment upon a promissory note. Demand for jury trial was denied and the cause tried to the court over the objection of the defendant, resulting in judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded for new trial. Orval Grim, of Cheyenne, for plaintiff in error. F. R. Blosser, of Cheyenne, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. ¶1 There is here involved the identical questions which were presented and decided in G. W. Montgomery v. F. E. Herring, 187 Okla. 10, 100 P.2d 892 . What was there said is controlling here. We therefore adopt the syllabus and opinion therein as the syllabus and opinion in this cause. ¶2 Reversed and remanded, with directions for new trial.