Title: WALKER v. JACOBS
Citation: 100 Okla. 277, 1924 OK 761, 229 P. 22 6
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: September 16, 1924

WALKER v. JACOBS Annotate this Case WALKER v. JACOBS 1924 OK 761 229 P. 226 100 Okla. 277 Case Number: 12993 Decided: 09/16/1924 Supreme Court of Oklahoma WALKER et al. v. JACOBS. Syllabus ¶0 Appeal and Error--Absence of Answer Brief--Reversal. Where the plaintiffs in error have duly filed and served brief in compliance with the rule of the Supreme Court, and defendant has neither filed brief nor offered excuse for failure so to do, the Supreme Court will not search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment may be sustained; but where the brief filed appears reasonably to sustain any assignment of prejudicial error, the judgment will be reversed. Commissioners' Opinion, Division No. 2. Error from District Court, Hughes County; John L. Coffman, Judge. Action by Willie Jacobs against Thomas Walker et al., to cancel oil and gas lease and to recover damages. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Reversed. Crump & Hall, for plaintiffs in error. Anglin & Stevenson, for defendant in error. JARMAN, C. ¶1 This is an appeal from the district court of Hughes county. The plaintiffs in error filed their brief November 24, 1922. No brief hits been filed by the defendant in error and no extension of time has been given to file same, and no reason has been assigned by the defendant in error as to why it has not filed brief. The brief of the plaintiffs in error appears to reasonably sustain the assignments of error, and under the rule of this court, the record will not be searched to find some theory upon which the judgment of the lower court may be sustained. ¶2 The judgment of the lower court is reversed.