Title: P. v. Winbush
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: S117489M
State: California
Issuer: California Supreme Court
Date: March 30, 2017

Filed 3/29/17  
 
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
 
 
THE PEOPLE, 
) 
 
 
) 
 
Plaintiff and Respondent, 
) 
 
 
) 
S117489 
 
v. 
) 
 
 
) 
GRAYLAND WINBUSH, 
)  
Alameda County 
 
)  
Super. Ct. No. 128408B 
 
Defendant and Appellant. 
)  
 
 ___________________________________ ) 
 
 
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND 
DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING 
 
THE COURT: 
 
The opinion in this matter filed January 26, 2017, and appearing at 2 Cal.5th 402, 
is modified as follows:   
 
On page 23 of the typed opinion (2 Cal.5th at p. 432), the sentence reading, “Her 
candid admission that she could not vote for death under any circumstances revealed 
views that would ‘ “prevent or substantially impair” ’ her ability to perform as a capital 
juror.  (Wainwright v. Witt, supra, 469 U.S. at p. 424.)” is modified to read, “The trial 
court’s implied factual finding as to E. I.’s true state of mind that (1) she could not vote 
for death under any circumstances, and (2) her point of view would ‘ “prevent or 
substantially impair” ’ her ability to perform as a capital juror (Wainwright v. Witt, supra, 
469 U.S. at p. 424), has substantial support in the record and we defer to it (People v. 
Mickel (2016) 2 Cal.5th 181, 215).” 
 
This modification does not change the judgment. 
 
The petition for rehearing is denied.