Title: COLEMAN v. NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO.
Citation: 170 Okla. 128, 1934 OK 707, 44 P.2d 880
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: December 11, 1934

COLEMAN v. NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO. Annotate this Case COLEMAN v. NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO. 1934 OK 707 44 P.2d 880 170 Okla. 128 Case Number: 25790 Decided: 12/11/1934 Supreme Court of Oklahoma COLEMAN et al. v. NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO. et al. Syllabus ¶0 Appeal and Error--Dismissal Where Appeal Without Merit and for Delay Only. Where it appears from an examination of the record, the assignments of error, and the motion to dismiss filed by the defendant in error that the appeal is without merit and for delay only, the cause will be dismissed. Appeal from District Court, Tulsa County; Harry L. S. Halley, Judge. Action by the New York Life Insurance Company et al. against Hattie Belle Coleman et al. on a note and foreclosure of a mortgage. From an order denying the motion to set aside sale, defendants appeal, Dismissed. Franklin H. Griggs, for plaintiffs in error. C. A. Steele and W. A. Daugherty, for defendants in error. PER CURIAM. ¶1 Plaintiffs in error were defendants and defendants in error were plaintiffs in the lower court, and will be so designated in this opinion. ¶2 Plaintiffs filed their petition June 18, 1932, seeking a judgment on a promissory note and foreclosure of a mortgage given to secure the same, and, under date of February 3, 1933, the judgment of the court was entered, granting judgment to the plaintiff as prayed and ordering foreclosure of real estate. The appeal is by transcript and purported bill of exceptions, but none of the evidence, if any was introduced, is shown, and no exception to the judgment of the court is made, and the only objection in the record to the order of the court overruling the motion to vacate the order approving sale. No evidence is in the record which shows what basis the court entered its order denying the application to set aside the sale, or what errors were committed, if any. ¶3 This court has held that where, upon examination of the record, the assignments of error, and the motion to dismiss, the appeal is manifestly without merit and taken for delay only, the same will be dismissed. Wetumka Ice Corporation v. Williams, 163 Okla. 169 , 21 P.2d 742 ; Johnson v. Mills Produce Co., 163 Okla. 121, 21 P.2d 1053; Semler v. State, 163 Okla. 58 , 20 P.2d 1041.