Title: McKesson Corporation v. Saito
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 638, 2002
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: March 7, 2003

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
McKESSON CORPORATION,
§
f/k/a McKESSON HBOC, INC.,
§
a Delaware corporation,
§
§
Defendant Below,
§ No. 638, 2002
Appellant,
§
§ Court Below: Court of Chancery
v.
§ of the State of Delaware in and for
§ New Castle County
NOEL SAITO,
§ C.A. No. 18553
§
Plaintiff Below,
§
Appellee.
§
Submitted: February 19, 2003
Decided:
March 7, 2003
Before WALSH, BERGER and HOLLAND, Justices.
O R D E R
This 7th day of March 2003, upon careful consideration of the briefs  submitted
in this matter the Court concludes that the Court of Chancery’s decision of September
20, 2002 setting the limits of discovery in this matter was an appropriate
implementation of the appellee’s entitlement to discovery established under this
Court’s decision in Saito v. McKesson, HBOC, Inc., 806 A.2d 113 (Del. 2002).  To
the extent that the Court of Chancery exercised its discretion in defining the scope of
discovery in an on-going Section 220 proceeding in that court, we review that ruling
under an abuse of discretion standard.  Security First Corp. v. U. S. Die Casting &
Dev. Co., 687 A.2d 563 (Del. 1997).  Upon review of the record, we find no abuse of
discretion.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of
Chancery be, and the same hereby is,
AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
   s/Joseph T. Walsh
      Justice