Title: Kenneth Spatz and Ta-Li Spatz v. City of Conway, Arkansas, Mayor Tab Townsell, Shelia Whitmore, Andy Hawkins, David Grimes, Adam Weeks, Sandy Brewer, Jack Bell, Mary Smith and Theodore Jones
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 05-635
State: Arkansas
Issuer: Arkansas Supreme Court
Date: July 1, 2005

Kenneth SPATZ and Ta-Li Spatz v. CITY OF CONWAY, Arkansas, Mayor Tab Townsell, Shelia Whitmore, Andy Hawkins, David Grimes, Adam Weeks, Sandy Brewer, Jack Bell, Mary Smith and Theodore Jones 05-635 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered July 1, 2005 Appeal &amp; error - emergency appeal of denial of petition for writ of mandamus denied - briefing schedule issued in error. - In a mandate issued on June 13, 2005 the supreme court denied emergency appeal on a denial of a petition for writ of mandamus; however, on June 28, 2005, the supreme court issued a briefing schedule on the denied appeal in error; the court regrets any confusion this error may have created. Briefing schedule issued in error. Wilson, Engstrom, Corum &amp; Coulter, by: Nate Coulter and Gary Corum, for appellants. Mark R. Hayes, General Counsel, and Michael Murphy, Conway City Attorney, for appellees. Per Curiam. This court issued a per curiam opinion in this case in Spatz v. City of Conway, ___ Ark. ___, ___ S.W.3d ___ (June 9, 2005), denying a petition filed in this court seeking a writ of mandamus. This court stated in the per curiam opinion that the petition was denied without prejudice to allow Spatz to seek "such relief as may yet be available under an appeal or otherwise." Spatz had previously filed a petition for writ of mandamus in Faulkner County Circuit Court that wasdenied. Spatz filed a notice of appeal from the circuit court's decision on June 9, 2005. A motion to expedite the appeal was also filed on June 13, 2005. This court granted the motion to expedite and denied the appeal because there was no time to hear the appeal before the election on June 14, 2005. In the mandate issued on June 13, 2005, we stated, "Emergency appeal of denial of petition for writ of mandamus is denied." However, on June 28, 2005, this court issued a briefing schedule on the denied appeal in error. We regret any confusion this error may have created.