Title: BLAKE v. METZ
Citation: 136 Okla. 150, 1929 OK 178, 276 P. 76 5
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: April 23, 1929

BLAKE v. METZ Annotate this Case BLAKE v. METZ 1929 OK 178 276 P. 765 136 Okla. 150 Case Number: 19017 Decided: 04/23/1929 Supreme Court of Oklahoma BLAKE, Co. Treas., et al. v. METZ. Syllabus Commissioners' Opinion, Division No. 2. Error from District Court, Creek County; Fred A. Speakman, Judge. Action by W. H. Metz against Ralph A. Blake, County Treasurer, and Fred L. Patrick. County Assessor of Creek County. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Reversed and remanded, with direction. J. F. Pardoe, Co. Atty., for plaintiffs in error. Davis & Frazier, for defendant in error. DIFFENDAFFER, C. ¶1 The identical questions involved in Blake, County Treasurer, and Fred L. Patrick, County Assessor, v. W. H. Metz, 136 Okla. 146 , 276 P. 762, are involved in this appeal. The pleadings are almost alike, the only difference being that a different tract of land is here involved, and in the petition and amended petition herein, the discrepancy in the description of the land does not appear. The record is in other respects identical, except that in this case it does not appear that the assistant county attorney approved the journal entry of the judgment. ¶2 From what is held in that case, it necessarily follows that the order denying the motion to vacate the judgment should be reversed, and the cause remanded, with direction to set aside and vacate the judgment rendered in this case. ¶3 The syllabus in Blake, County Treasurer, et al. v. Metz, supra, is adopted as the syllabus to this case.