Title: Winarske v. State
Citation: 2015 ND 21
Docket Number: 
State: north-dakota
Issuer: north-dakota Supreme Court
Date: February 12, 2015

Winarske v. State Annotate this Case Court Description: A district court judgment denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2015 ND 21 Adam Winarske, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee Nos. 20140112-20140118 Appeal from the District Court of Stark County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable William A. Herauf, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Lynn Slaathaug Moen, P.O. Box 547, Mayville, ND 58257, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief. James Allen Hope, Assistant State's Attorney, P.O. Box 130, Dickinson, ND 58602-0130, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief. Winarske v. StateNos. 20140112-20140118 Per Curiam. [¶1] Adam Winarske appealed a district court judgment denying his application for post-conviction relief. Winarske argued he is entitled to post-conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel, his guilty pleas were not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily given, and he was denied effective assistance of counsel at all stages of the proceedings. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court did not err in dismissing Winarske's application for post-conviction relief, after an evidentiary hearing. [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Dale V. Sandstrom Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Carol Ronning Kapsner