Title: Shirley Bartz,Â Relator,Â vs. Meadow Lane Healthcare, andÂ Constitution State Services, Respondents.
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: A07-583
State: Minnesota
Issuer: Minnesota Supreme Court
Date: June 28, 2007

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A07-583 Shirley Bartz, Relator, vs. <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:4.0in;text-indent:-4.0in;line-height: normal">Meadow Lane Healthcare, and <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:4.0in;text-indent:-4.0in;line-height: normal">Constitution State Services, Respondents. Considered and decided by the court en banc. A M E N D E D O R D E R Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed February 26, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that "[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case). Dated: June 25, 2006 BY THE COURT: <p class="MsoFootnoteText" style="margin-left:3.0in;text-indent:.5in;line-height: normal"> <p class="MsoFootnoteText" style="margin-left:3.0in;text-indent:.5in;line-height: normal"> <p class="MsoFootnoteText" style="margin-left:3.0in;text-indent:.5in;line-height: normal"> /s/ <p class="MsoFootnoteText" style="margin-left:3.0in;text-indent:.5in;line-height: normal"> <p class="MsoFootnoteText" style="margin-left:3.0in;text-indent:.5in;line-height: normal">Russell A. Anderson <p class="MsoFootnoteText" style="margin-left:3.0in;text-indent:.5in;line-height: normal">Chief Justice