Title: Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Jesus Silva-Garcia, et al.
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 507, 2012
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: September 26, 2012

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., 
 
Appellant Below, 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
JESUS SILVA-GARCIA and CITY 
WINDOW CLEANING OF 
DELAWARE, INC., 
 
Appellees Below, 
Appellees. 
§ 
§ 
§  No. 507, 2012 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below—Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware, 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§  C.A. No. N12-03-003 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
 
Submitted: September 13, 2012 
Decided: 
September 26, 2012 
 
Before BERGER, JACOBS, and RIDGELY, Justices. 
 
 
O R D E R 
 
This 26th day of September 2012, it appears to the Court that: 
(1) The appellant below, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (“Liberty 
Mutual”), has petitioned this Court, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 42, to accept 
an appeal from an interlocutory order of the Superior Court dated June 13, 2012, 
which dismissed Liberty Mutual’s appeal from an order of the Industrial Accident 
Board (“IAB”).  The IAB held that insurance coverage existed on the date of the 
claimant’s industrial accident. The Superior Court held that Liberty Mutual’s 
appeal was interlocutory because the IAB has not yet rendered a final decision on 
the claimant’s petition for compensation due. 
 
 
-2-
(2) Liberty Mutual filed an application for certification to take an 
interlocutory appeal on August 22, 2012.  The Superior Court denied the 
certification application on September 5, 2012. 
(3) Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound 
discretion of this Court.  In the exercise of its discretion, this Court has concluded 
that the application for interlocutory review does not meet the requirements of 
Supreme Court Rule 42(b) and should be refused. 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the within 
interlocutory appeal be REFUSED. 
BY THE COURT: 
 
/s/ Jack B. Jacobs 
Justice