Title: Amy Hinman v. State of Florida
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: SC12-2501
State: Florida
Issuer: Florida Supreme Court
Date: January 16, 2014

Supreme Court of Florida 
 
 
_____________ 
 
No. SC12-2501 
_____________ 
 
 
AMY HINMAN, 
Petitioner, 
 
vs. 
 
STATE OF FLORIDA, 
Respondent. 
 
[January 16, 2014] 
 
 
PER CURIAM. 
 
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District 
Court of Appeal in State v. Hinman, 100 So. 3d 220 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), based on 
express and direct conflict.  See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.  Upon further 
consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted.  
Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding. 
 
It is so ordered. 
 
POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and 
PERRY, JJ., concur. 
LEWIS, J., dissents. 
 
 
- 2 - 
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND 
IF FILED, DETERMINED. 
 
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal – Direct 
Conflict of Decisions  
 
Third District  – Case No. 3D11-2748  
 
(Dade County)  
 
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, Maria E. Lauredo, Chief Assistant Public 
Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Assistant Public Defender, Miami, Florida,  
 
for Petitioner 
  
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, Richard L. Polin, Bureau 
Chief Criminal Appeals, and Keri T. Josesph, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, 
Florida, 
 
for Respondent