Title: HILLERY ATKINS BUICK CO. v. COX
Citation: 114 Okla. 46, 1925 OK 807, 243 P. 93 5
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: October 6, 1925

HILLERY ATKINS BUICK CO. v. COX Annotate this Case HILLERY ATKINS BUICK CO. v. COX 1925 OK 807 243 P. 935 114 Okla. 46 Case Number: 16734 Decided: 10/06/1925 Supreme Court of Oklahoma HILLERY ATKINS BUICK CO. et al. v. COX. Syllabus ¶0 Appeal and Error--Order Overruling Motion to Dismiss Held Not Appealable. An order overruling a motion to dismiss, which raises questions in bar of proceeding further with the case, is not an appealable order. Error from County Court, Stephens County; John W. Scott, Judge. Action by J. D. Cox against the Hillery Atkins Buick Company and others. Judgment overruling a motion to dismiss, and the defendant appeals. Appeal dismissed. H. B. Lockett, for plaintiffs in error. J. W. Marshall, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. ¶1 This case is appealed from the county court of Stephens county. It was called for trial on the 9th day of March, 1925, and plaintiff in error presented a motion to dismiss on the ground that there was then pending in the district court of Stephens county an action between the same parties and involving the same questions and that the same was so pending when the instant case was filed. This motion is what is known in common pleading as a plea in bar. The court overruled the motion, and plaintiff in error excepted, gave notice of appeal, and was allowed 60 days in which to serve case-made. Plaintiff in error filed no answer or other plea, and, upon overruling the motion, the court proceeded to try the case, and rendered judgment in favor of defendant in error. To this action of the court no exception is saved and no notice of appeal given.