Title: CASNER v. WOOLEY
Citation: 114 P. 70 0, 114 P. 700, 1911 OK 79, 28 Okla. 424
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: March 21, 1911

CASNER v. WOOLEY Annotate this Case CASNER v. WOOLEY 1911 OK 79 114 P. 700 28 Okla. 424 Case Number: 1320 Decided: 03/21/1911 Supreme Court of Oklahoma CASNER v. WOOLEY. Syllabus ¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Case-Made--Extension of Time to Settle--Powers of Special Judge. A special judge or judge pro tempore, while possessing the power to sign and settle a case-made after he has ceased to sit as judge, has no power to extend the time for its settlement and signing, and where he attempts to do so his act is a nullity. Error from District Court, Tulsa County; R. L. Davidson, Special Judge. Action by F. W. Casner against James Wooley. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. Dismissed. E. G. Wilson, for plaintiff in error. Biddison & Campbell, for defendant in error. TURNER, C. J. ¶1 On January 9, 1909, the special judge trying the cause, after overruling the motion for a new trial, entered judgment against the plaintiff, taxed him with the cost, and gave him 90 days in which to prepare and serve a case-made. After the expiration of the term, and after he had ceased to sit as such, said judge, on March 30, 1909, granted an extension of time for said purpose, and the case-made in question was signed and settled by him within the time thus extended. ¶2 The petition in error should be dismissed, pursuant to the motion filed. The law in Horner et al. v. Goltry & Sons, 23 Okla. 905 , 101 P. 1111, and cases there cited, govern this case. ¶3 It is so ordered. ¶4 All the Justices concur.