Title: STATE ex rel. COM'RS OF THE LAND OFFICE v. HENDRIX
Citation: 167 P.2d 43, 1946 OK 70, 196 Okla. 596
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: February 26, 1946

STATE ex rel. COM'RS OF THE LAND OFFICE v. HENDRIX Annotate this Case HILL v. RIDDLE 1912 OK 726 128 P. 112 36 Okla. 122 Case Number: 2141 Decided: 11/19/1912 Supreme Court of Oklahoma HILL v. RIDDLE. Syllabus ¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Failure to File Brief--Dismissal. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Crawford & Bolen, for plaintiff in error. ROBERTSON, C. ¶1 This appeal was filed in this court November 22, 1910. No brief has been filed by either party, and it is evident that the appeal has been abandoned. The petition in error should, therefore, be dismissed for want of prosecution under rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi) of this court. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290 , 111 P. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779 , 117 P. 200; Bender v. Bender et al., 30 Okla. 288 , 119 P. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296 , 119 P. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287 , 119 P. 205. ¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.