Title: HYDE v. JOHNSON
Citation: 1922 OK 280, 209 P. 44 0, 87 Okla. 88
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: September 26, 1922

HYDE v. JOHNSON Annotate this Case HYDE v. JOHNSON 1922 OK 280 209 P. 440 87 Okla. 88 Case Number: 12543 Decided: 09/26/1922 Supreme Court of Oklahoma HYDE et al. v. JOHNSON. Syllabus ¶0 Appeal and Error -- Nullity of Case-Made -- Dismissal. Motion to dismiss sustained upon the grounds stated in the opinion. Error from District Court, Nowata County; , Judge. Action between Lula Johnson, nee Musgrove, and George W. Hyde et al. From the judgment, the latter bring error. Motion to dismiss sustained. Walter S. Keith and Harold McGugin, for plaintiffs in error. A. B. Campbell, for defendant in error. KANE, J. ¶1 This cause comes on to be heard upon the motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the case-made was signed and settled before the time expired in which to suggest amendments. ¶2 The record shows that various orders extending the time to make and serve case-made were entered, the last one being on the 18th day of July, 1921, and extended the time 40 days from July 30, 1921, with ten days thereafter in which to suggest amendments, which time expired on the 8th day of September, 1921, and the time in which to suggest amendments expired on the 18th day of September, 1921. On the 6th day of August, 1921, case-made was settled and signed by the court without any notice to the defendant in error and without her presence and without waiver of her presence. ¶3 The rule is that a case-made settled and signed before the expiration of time allowed for suggesting amendments is a nullity, and confers no jurisdiction upon the Supreme Court to review alleged errors presented thereby. Frey v. McCune et al., 49 Okla. 493 , 153 P. 109.