Title: SAVERY v. COCHRAN
Citation: 174 Okla. 511, 1935 OK 1088, 51 P.2d 290
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: November 5, 1935

SAVERY v. COCHRAN Annotate this Case SAVERY v. COCHRAN 1935 OK 1088 51 P.2d 290 174 Okla. 511 Case Number: 26551 Decided: 11/05/1935 Supreme Court of Oklahoma SAVERY v. COCHRAN et al. Syllabus ¶0 Appeal and Error--Review--Motion to Vacate Judgment and Order Thereon not Part of Record. A motion to vacate a judgment and the order made thereon are no part of the record, and unless the proceedings thereon are incorporated in a case-made or bill of exceptions and duly presented to this court, the error predicated upon such motion and order will not be reviewed. Appeal from District Court, Pontotoc County; Tal Crawford, Judge. Proceedings by Agnes Cochran, defendants, to vacate a judgment. From an order vacating judgment, plaintiff, R. S. Savery, appeals. Dismissed. Leo G. Mann and C. F. Green, for plaintiff in error. W. F. Schulte, for defendants in error. PER CURIAM. ¶1 On the 17th day of December, 1930, a judgment was rendered in the trial court, and thereafter the defendants filed motion to vacate the said judgment, and on the 13th day of February, 1935, the court entered its order vacating and setting aside said judgment, from which plaintiff appeals. ¶2 Although a case-made was served upon the defendants in error, the same was never settled and signed by the judge, nor is it stipulated that the same is a true and correct case-made. The appeal is therefore by transcript. ¶3 This court has many times held that motion and the rulings made thereon are no part of the record unless incorporated in a case-made or bill of exceptions and presented to this court. Hill v. Okla. Life Ins. Co., 173 Okla. 472. 50 P.2d 320 ; First National Bank v. McIntosh, 113 Okla. 15, 237 P. 460; Lamb v. Young, 24 Okla. 614 , 104 P. 335; Exchange Nat. Bank v. Merritt, 108 Okla. 184 . 235 P. 180; Whitaker v. Chestnut, 65 Okla. 122, 165 P. 160. The motion to vacate and the order thereon therefore are not before this court. ¶4 The appeal is therefore dismissed.