Title: HOLMES v. CITY OF MUSKOGEE
Citation: 169 Okla. 514, 1934 OK 671, 37 P.2d 982
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: November 27, 1934

HOLMES v. CITY OF MUSKOGEE Annotate this Case HOLMES v. CITY OF MUSKOGEE 1934 OK 671 37 P.2d 982 169 Okla. 514 Case Number: 24260 Decided: 11/27/1934 Supreme Court of Oklahoma HOLMES v. CITY OF MUSKOGEE et al. Syllabus ¶0 Master and Servant--Workmen's Compensation--Motion to Dismiss Proceeding to Review Award Sustained Where Merits of Motion Admitted. In a proceeding to review an award of the State Industrial Commission, when the respondent has filed a motion to dismiss upon the ground that the proceedings are not duly prosecuted, this court may dismiss said proceedings when, in response to an order for the petitioner to respond thereto, the merits of the motion to dismiss are admitted, and the record of the proceedings supports such admission. Original action in the Supreme Court by Paul Holmes, claimant, to review an award of the State Industrial Commission wherein the City of Muskogee was respondent. Dismissed. Bower Broaddus, for petitioner. Forrester Brewster and J. Berry King, Atty, Gen., for respondents. PER CURIAM. ¶1 On the 6th day of September, 1934, motion to dismiss the appeal for failure to prosecute was filed on behalf of the city of Muskogee, a municipal corporation, carrying its own risk. ¶2 Thereafter a response by order of court was filed, and in that response the petitioner states: "Comes now Paul Holmes by his attorney of record and states that he does not wish to press his appeal in the above matter."