Title: Michael Wade Locke v. State of Florida
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: SC94-396
State: Florida
Issuer: Florida Supreme Court
Date: June 15, 2000

Supreme Court of Florida
 
____________
No. SC94396
____________
MICHAEL WADE LOCKE,
Petitioner,
vs.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
[June 15, 2000]
PER CURIAM.
We have for review a decision of the First District Court of Appeal certifying
the following question to be one of great public importance:
DOES THE FAILURE OF THE TRIAL COURT TO
ORALLY PRONOUNCE EACH STATUTORILY
AUTHORIZED COST INDIVIDUALLY AT THE TIME
OF SENTENCING CONSTITUTE FUNDAMENTAL
ERROR?
 
Locke v. State, 719 So. 2d 1249, 1252 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).  We have jurisdiction. 
See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.  For the reasons expressed in our opinion in
-2-
Maddox v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S367 (Fla. May 11, 2000), we answer the
certified question in the negative.  We approve the decision below and find that the
unpreserved sentencing errors asserted in this case do not constitute fundamental
error. 
It is so ordered. 
HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and
QUINCE, JJ., concur.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND IF
FILED, DETERMINED. 
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Certified Great
Public Importance
First District - Case No. 1D97-2431 
(Escambia County)
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Carol Ann Turner, Assistant Public Defender,
Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, Florida,
for Petitioner
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and James W. Rogers, Bureau Chief,
Criminal Appeals, Tallahassee, Florida, 
for Respondent