Title: RAGSDALE v. RAGSDALE
Citation: 136 Okla. 248, 1929 OK 196, 277 P. 58 3
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: May 7, 1929

RAGSDALE v. RAGSDALE Annotate this Case RAGSDALE v. RAGSDALE 1929 OK 196 277 P. 583 136 Okla. 248 Case Number: 19309 Decided: 05/07/1929 Supreme Court of Oklahoma RAGSDALE et al. v. RAGSDALE. Syllabus ¶0 Appeal and Error--Reversal in Absence of Answer Brief. The syllabus in the case of City National Bank v. Coatney et al., 122 Okla. 233 , 253 P. 481, is hereby adopted as the syllabus in this case. Error from District Court, Muskogee County; Enloe V. Vernor, Judge. Action by Lewis Ragsdale against Howard Ragsdale et al. Injunction granted. From this judgment, defendants appeal. Reversed and remanded, with directions. J. Bernard Smith, for plaintiffs in error. C. G. McKoin, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. ¶1 This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Muskogee county in an action wherein the plaintiffs in error were defendants below. Plaintiffs in error in due time served and filed their briefs in full compliance with the rules of this court, but the defendant in error has wholly failed to file any brief, pleading, or to otherwise appear in this cause upon the merits of the case, nor has he offered any excuse for his failure to do so. In the case of City National Bank v. Coatney et al., 122 Okla. 233 , 253 P. 481, this court said: