Title: NAPIER v. DILDAY
Citation: 132 P. 108 5, 1913 OK 388, 38 Okla. 365
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: June 10, 1913

NAPIER v. DILDAY Annotate this Case NAPIER v. DILDAY 1913 OK 388 132 P. 1085 38 Okla. 365 Case Number: 4810 Decided: 06/10/1913 Supreme Court of Oklahoma NAPIER et al. v. DILDAY. Syllabus ¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Review--Consent Judgment. A case having been tried to the court without the intervention of a jury and the finding upon which the judgment was rendered being made by the consent of all parties, the judgment being rendered according to such finding, there is nothing for this court to review, and the proceeding in error will be dismissed. Chalmers B. Wilson and W. H. Hills, for plaintiffs in error. Robberts & Curran, for defendant in error. WILLIAMS, J. ¶1 The record shows that the finding made against the plaintiffs in error, upon which the judgment was rendered, was with the consent of their counsel. Consent ends all contention between the parties, and there is nothing to review on appeal. Baker v. Van Ness et al., 37 Okla. 122 , 130 P. 536; Schmidt v. Oregon Gold Mining Co., 28 Ore. 9, 40 P. 406, 1014, 52 Am. St. Rep. 759, and authorities therein cited. The proceeding in error is dismissed. ¶2 All the Justices concur.