Title: Eric M. Madson, Respondent, vs. Minneapolis Police Department, City of Minneapolis, Self-Insured, Relator.
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: A10-897
State: Minnesota
Issuer: Minnesota Supreme Court
Date: September 2, 2010

1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A10-897 Eric M. Madson, Respondent, vs. Minneapolis Police Department, City of Minneapolis, Self-Insured, Relator. ________________________________ Mark F. Gaughan, Caroline Bell Beckman, Erickson, Bell, Beckman & Quinn, P.A., Roseville, Minnesota, for respondent. Thomas J. Miller, Minneapolis City Attorney’s Office, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for relator. _______________________________ Considered and decided by the court without oral argument. O R D E R Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed April 20, 2010, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. 2 See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case). Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees. Dated: August 25, 2010 BY THE COURT: /s/ Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice