Title: WOODWARD v. BRUHWILDER
Citation: 153 P. 86 3, 1915 OK 1048, 54 Okla. 131
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: December 14, 1915

WOODWARD v. BRUHWILDER Annotate this Case WOODWARD v. BRUHWILDER 1915 OK 1048 153 P. 863 54 Okla. 131 Case Number: 6421 Decided: 12/14/1915 Supreme Court of Oklahoma WOODWARD v. BRUHWILDER. Syllabus ¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Briefs--Failure to File--Disposition of Cause. Where plaintiff in error fails to comply with rule 7 (38 Okla. vi, 137 P. ix) by filing a brief, the cause may be continued or appeal dismissed, or the judgment affirmed, in the discretion of the court. Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge. Proceedings against C. F. Woodward by August Bruhwilder. From the judgment, Woodward brings error. Affirmed. Bennett & Pope, for plaintiff in error C. H. Shubert, for defendant in error PER CURIAM. ¶1 This appeal was docketed in this court on May 16, 1914, and was submitted on December 6, 1915.The plaintiff in error has filed no brief, nor asked for an extension of time within which to do so, nor given any explanation for his failure to comply with rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 P. ix). The defendant in error has filed a motion, asking that the judgment be affirmed. This motion should be granted. Chamberlin v. Fearnow, 46 Okla. 161 , 148 P. 138; Simmons v. Berryhill, 48 Okla. 98 , 149 P. 1131. ¶2 We therefore recommend that the judgment be affirmed. ¶3 By the Court: It is so ordered.