Title: BISHOP v. HARRIS
Citation: 168 Okla. 626, 1934 OK 372, 34 P.2d 243
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: June 26, 1934

BISHOP v. HARRIS Annotate this Case BISHOP v. HARRIS 1934 OK 372 34 P.2d 243 168 Okla. 626 Case Number: 25326 Decided: 06/26/1934 Supreme Court of Oklahoma BISHOP v. HARRIS. Syllabus ¶0 Appeal and Error--Appeal Dismissed Where Petition in Error not Filed Within Six Months Period. Where petition in error is not tiled in this court until after the expiration of six months from the date of the judgment or order appealed from, the appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appeal from District Court, Lincoln County; Hal Johnson, Judge. Action by V. E. Harris against Ed Bishop for damages to personal property. From a judgment for the plaintiff, defendant appeals. Dismissed. Courtland M. Feuquay, for plaintiff in error. Erwin & Erwin, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. ¶1 This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Lincoln county, Okla., rendered on June 13, 1933. The motion for new trial was overruled on the 22nd day of July, 1933. The petition in error with case-made attached was filed in this court on the 25th day of January, 1934. The defendant in error has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that this proceeding was not commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or order overruling the motion for new trial. Section 547, O. S. 1931, provides that all proceedings for reversing, vacating or modifying a judgment or final order shall be commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of. ¶2 In the case of Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. Austin, 161 Okla. 280, 18 P.2d 539 , the syllabus is as follows: "Where petition in error is not filed in this court until after the expiration of six months from the date of the judgment or order appealed from, the appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction." ¶3 To like effect see Gilmore v. Smith, 93 Okla. 4. 219 P. 92: Verschoyle v. McDaniels, 127 Okla. 166, 260 P. 55; Williams et al. v. Local Bldg. & Loan Ass'n, 165 Okla. 244 . 25 P.2d 1086.