Title: Marler v. Martin
Citation: 2018 ND 238
Docket Number: 
State: north-dakota
Issuer: north-dakota Supreme Court
Date: November 6, 2018

Marler v. Martin Annotate this Case Court Description: 238 A judgment and order denying a motion for a new trial are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2018 ND238 Brian Marler, Plaintiff v. Kevin Martin, Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff, and Appellant and Jonathan A. Gerena and Rory Wilson, ABOS LLC, Brandon C. Knudson, Third-Party Defendants No. 20180019 Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Kirsten Marie Sjue, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Kevin S. Martin (argued), self-represented, Galeton, CO, defendant, third-party plaintiff, and appellant. Brian Marler, plaintiff; no appearance. Marler v. MartinNo. 20180019 Per Curiam. [¶1] Kevin Martin appeals from a judgment entered after a jury awarded Brian Marler $10,400 in damages for breach of contract and from an order denying Martin's motion for a new trial. On appeal, Martin raises thirteen separate issues for this Court to address. This Court is limited to a review of the issues Martin raised in his motion for a new trial. See Prairie Supply, Inc. v. Apple Elec., Inc., 2015 ND 190, ¶ 7, 867 N.W.2d 335. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Martin's motion for a new trial. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jon J. Jensen Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers