Title: Steven R. Turner, Relator, vs. EVTAC Mining, and CNA ClaimsPlus, Respondents, and Iron Range Rehab Center, and Orthopaedic Associates of Duluth, P.A., Intervenors.
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: A06-1195
State: Minnesota
Issuer: Minnesota Supreme Court
Date: November 30, 2006

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A06-1195 Steven R. Turner, Relator, vs. EVTAC Mining, and CNA ClaimsPlus, Respondents, and Iron Range Rehab Center, and Orthopaedic Associates of Duluth, P.A., <p class="MsoNormal" align="left" style="margin-left:1.0in;text-align:left; text-indent:.5in;line-height:normal;">Intervenors. Considered and decided by the court en banc. O R D E R Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed May 25, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton,317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that, "[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case). Dated: November 22, 2006 BY THE COURT: <p class="MsoFootnoteText" style="margin-left:3.0in;text-indent:.5in;line-height: normal"> <p class="MsoFootnoteText" style="margin-left:3.0in;text-indent:.5in;line-height: normal"> <p class="MsoFootnoteText" style="margin-left:3.0in;text-indent:.5in;line-height: normal"> /s/ <p class="MsoFootnoteText" style="margin-left:3.0in;text-indent:.5in;line-height: normal"> <p class="MsoFootnoteText" style="margin-left:3.0in;text-indent:.5in;line-height: normal">Paul H. Anderson <p class="MsoFootnoteText" style="margin-left:3.0in;text-indent:.5in;line-height: normal">Associate Justice