Title: Greybull v. State
Citation: 2005 ND 1, 692 N.W.2d 784
Docket Number: 
State: north-dakota
Issuer: north-dakota Supreme Court
Date: January 19, 2005

Greybull v. State Annotate this Case [Go to Documents]Filed Jan. 19, 2005[Download as WordPerfect]IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA2005 ND 1 Danielle Greybull, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee No. 20040254 Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Danielle Greybull (on brief), pro se, 1010 W. 6th Avenue, Shakopee, MN 55379, petitioner and appellant. Cynthia M. Feland (on brief), Assistant State's Attorney, Courthouse, 514 E. Thayer, Bismarck, ND 58501-4413, for respondent and appellee. Greybull v. State No. 20040254 Per Curiam. [¶1] Danielle Greybull appeals from the district court's dismissal of her petition for post-conviction relief. Greybull argues Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004) supports her position that the holding in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 490 (2000) should be applied retroactively to her case. The district court dismissed her petition, finding this Court had already addressed this issue in Greybull v. State, 2004 ND 116, 680 N.W.2d 254 . [¶2] We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). [¶3]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Carol Ronning Kapsner Dale V. Sandstrom William A. Neumann Mary Muehlen Maring