Title: Nistazos Holdings, LLC v. Milford Plaza Enterprises, LLC
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 481, 2016
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: September 29, 2016

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
NISTAZOS HOLDINGS, LLC,  
§ 
 
§ 
No. 481, 2016 
 
Plaintiff Below, 
§ 
 
 
Appellant, 
§ 
Court Below—Court of Chancery of 
 
 
§ 
the State of Delaware 
 
v. 
§ 
 
 
 
§ 
C.A. No. 11859 
MILFORD PLAZA ENTERPRISES, 
§ 
LLC,  
§ 
 
 
 
§ 
 
Defendant Below, 
§ 
 
 
Appellee. 
§ 
 
 
 
 
  
Submitted: September 26, 2016  
Decided: 
September 29, 2016 
 
Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN and SEITZ, Justices. 
 
O R D E R 
 
This 29th day of September 2016, it appears to the Court that: 
 
(1) 
We have before us an application for interlocutory review of a Court 
of Chancery August 31, 2016 teleconference ruling denying preliminary injunctive 
relief in a case involving a commercial lease agreement.  In a detailed order dated 
September 26, 2016, the Court of Chancery carefully considered the relevant 
factors of Supreme Court Rule 42(b) and explained why interlocutory review of its 
August 31 decision was not warranted. 
 
(2) 
This Court gives considerable weight to a trial judge’s thoughtful 
consideration of the Rule 42(b) factors.  For the reasons stated in the Court of 
2 
 
Chancery’s well-reasoned order of September 26, 2016, the Court determines in its 
discretion that the application for interlocutory review does not meet the 
requirements of Rule 42(b) and should be refused. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the interlocutory 
appeal is REFUSED.   
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/  James T. Vaughn, Jr.     
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice