Title: ST. LOUIS I. M. & S. RY. CO. v. FARLEY
Citation: 136 P. 119 6, 1913 OK 392, 40 Okla. 55
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: June 10, 1913

ST. LOUIS I. M. & S. RY. CO. v. FARLEY Annotate this Case ST. LOUIS I. M. & S. RY. CO. v. FARLEY 1913 OK 392 136 P. 1196 40 Okla. 55 Case Number: 5098 Decided: 06/10/1913 Supreme Court of Oklahoma ST. LOUIS, I. M. & S. RY. CO. v. FARLEY et al. ¶0 September, 1913, Decided Error from District Court, Rogers County; T. L. Brown, Judge. Action by W. P. Farley and Heber Skinner, partners as Farley & Skinner, against the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals. Dismissed. Vincent M. Miles, for plaintiff in error. Seymour Riddle, for defendants in error. KANE, J. ¶1 This cause comes on to be heard on motion to dismiss the appeal of the plaintiff in error, upon the following grounds: (1) That the case-made of the plaintiff in error herein was not served upon the defendants in error, or upon either of the defendants in error, or upon their attorney, within three days after the rendition of the judgment herein appealed from, nor did the court, or the judge thereof, extend the time for making and serving said case-made. (2) That no order of the court in which said judgment was rendered was made by the court, or by the judge thereof, and filed or entered of record herein, extending the time within which the plaintiffs in error should make and serve case-made herein, and that said case-made was not served upon the defendants in error, or either of them, or upon their attorneys, within three days from and after the rendition of the judgment herein appealed from. A great many cases by this court sustain the contention of counsel for defendants in error. The motion to dismiss must be sustained. ¶2 All the Justices concur.