Title: Interest of P.T.D., C.R.D., P.A.D., P.P.D., & N.A.D.
Citation: 2019 ND 3
Docket Number: 
State: north-dakota
Issuer: north-dakota Supreme Court
Date: January 15, 2019

Interest of P.T.D., C.R.D., P.A.D., P.P.D., & N.A.D. Annotate this Case Court Description: 3 An appeal from a juvenile court order finding five children to be deprived is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2019 ND 3 In the Interest of P.T.D., a child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. P.T.D., child, and T.P.D., father, Respondents and A.R.D., mother, Respondent and Appellant No. 20180192 In the Interest of C.R.D., a child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. C.R.D., child, and T.P.D., father, Respondents and A.R.D., mother, Respondent and Appellant No. 20180193 In the Interest of P.A.D., a child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. P.A.D., child, and T.P.D., father, Respondents and A.R.D., mother, Respondent and Appellant No. 20180194 In the Interest of P.P.D., a child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. P.P.D., child, and T.P.D., father, Respondents and A.R.D., mother, Respondent and Appellant No. 20180195 In the Interest of N.A.D., a child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. N.A.D., child, and T.P.D., father, Respondents and A.R.D., mother, Respondent and Appellant No. 20180196 Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Jay A. Schmitz, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Frederick R. Fremgen, State's Attorney, Jamestown, ND, for petitioner and appellee. Kiara Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellant. Interest of P.T.D., C.R.D., P.A.D., P.P.D., and N.A.D.Nos. 20180192-20180196 Per Curiam. [¶1] A.D. appeals from a juvenile court order finding her five children to be deprived. On appeal, A.D. argues the juvenile court erred by finding the children to be deprived because the unsanitary and dangerous household has been cured by a move to a new home, any drug issues are now under control, there was no evidence she used drugs around the children, and the record does not contain any evidence her actions have negatively affected the children. We conclude the juvenile court's findings are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jon J. Jensen Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte