Title: Holland v. Rust-Holland
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 250, 2005
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: July 15, 2005

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
BRYON C. HOLLAND,  
 
§  
 
 
 
 
 
 
§   No. 250, 2005 
 
Respondent Below, 
 
§  
 
Appellant,  
 
 
§   Court Below – Family Court 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§   of the State of Delaware, 
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
§   in and for New Castle County 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§   File No. CN99-09654 
PAMELA RUST-HOLLAND,  
§   Petition No. 05-15776 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§  
 
Petitioner Below,  
 
§  
 
Appellee. 
 
 
 
§  
 
 
O R D E R 
 
 
This 15th day of July 2005, it appears to the Court that: 
 
(1) 
On June 15, 2005, the Clerk of this Court issued a notice to 
show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme 
Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant’s failure to comply with Rule 42 when 
taking an appeal from an apparent interlocutory order. 
 
(2) 
The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause 
within the required 10-day period.  Therefore, dismissal of this action is 
deemed to be unopposed. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court 
Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Randy J. Holland 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice