Title: Kostyshyn v. New Castle County, et al.
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 371, 2009
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: August 21, 2009

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
PETER KOSTYSHYN and 
PATRICIA KOSTYSHYN, 
 
Plaintiffs Below, 
Appellants, 
 
v. 
 
NEW CASTLE COUNTY, et al. 
and TOWN OF BELLEFONTE, 
 
Defendants Below, 
Appellees. 
§ 
§  No. 371, 2009 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below—Court of Chancery 
§  of the State of Delaware, 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§   
§   
§ 
§ 
 
Submitted:  July 30, 2009 
Decided:  August 7, 2009 
Corrected:  August 21, 2009 
 
O R D E R 
 
This 7th day of August 2009, it appears to the Court that, on June 26, 2009, 
appellants filed a notice of appeal from a Court of Chancery order denying their 
motion to file, in forma pauperis, a complaint that was never assigned a civil 
action number by the trial court.  This Court issued a notice to appellants to show 
cause why their appeal should not be dismissed for the failure to comply with 
Supreme Court Rule 42 when appealing an interlocutory order.  The appellants 
have failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day 
period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. 
 
2 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme 
Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED. 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
/s/ Myron T. Steele 
Chief Justice