Title: State v. Moore
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: S060134
State: Oregon
Issuer: Oregon Supreme Court
Date: February 27, 2014

Filed: February 27, 2014 
 
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON 
 
STATE OF OREGON, 
Petitioner on Review, 
 
v. 
JESSE JAMES MOORE, 
Respondent on Review. 
 
(CC 091131; CA A145081; SC S60134) 
 
 
En Banc 
 
 
On respondent on review's petition for reconsideration filed January 2, 2014; 
considered and under advisement on February 19, 2014. 
 
 
Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, Salem, filed the 
petition for reconsideration. 
 
 
No appearance contra. 
 
 
PER CURIAM 
 
 
The petition for reconsideration is allowed.  The former opinion is adhered to as 
modified. 
 
 
*Appeal from an order of the Tillamook County Circuit Court, Mari Garric 
Trevino, Judge. 247 Or App 39, 269 P3d 72 (2011). 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1 
 
 
PER CURIAM 
1 
 
 
Defendant has petitioned for reconsideration of our decision in State v. 
2 
Moore, 354 Or 493, __ P3d __ (2013), which reversed the decision of the Court of 
3 
Appeals and the order of the circuit court and remanded the case to the circuit court for 
4 
further proceedings.  Defendant raises a number of arguments for reconsideration of our 
5 
opinion on the merits, which we reject without discussion.  However, defendant correctly 
6 
notes that the Court of Appeals declined to address two alternative bases for affirmance 
7 
that defendant had advanced in that court.  State v. Moore, 247 Or App 39, 47 n 4, 269 
8 
P3d 72 (2011).  Defendant now asks this court to remand the case to the Court of Appeals 
9 
for consideration of those issues in the first instance.  We agree that we should do so.  We 
10 
accordingly allow the petition for reconsideration and modify our disposition of this case 
11 
as follows:  The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the case is remanded to 
12 
the Court of Appeals to consider defendant's alternative grounds for affirmance. 
13 
 
 
The petition for reconsideration is allowed.  The former opinion is adhered 
14 
to as modified. 
15 
 
16 
 
17