Title: Gym Birthdaysuit, III v. Ho
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: SCPW-23-0000375
State: Hawaii
Issuer: Hawaii Supreme Court
Date: July 20, 2023

SCPW-23-0000375 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I GYM BIRTHDAYSUIT, III, FORMERLY KNOWN AS JAMES PAUL CALZETTA AKA JAMES PAUL CALZETA, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE TIMOTHY E. HO, Judge of the District Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge, and CIRRUS ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. and PAU STREET PARTNERS II, LLC, Respondents. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, and Eddins, JJ., Circuit Judge Souza and Circuit Judge Cataldo assigned by reason of vacancies) Upon consideration of the June 1, 2023 submission by Gym Birthdaysuit III, formerly known as James Paul Calzetta aka James Paul Calzeta (Petitioner), and the exhibits attached thereto, we conclude the Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the district court exceeded its jurisdiction, committed a Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-23-0000375 20-JUL-2023 08:12 AM Dkt. 16 ODDP 2 flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion, or refused to act on a subject properly before it, in which the court was subject to a legal duty to act (see State ex rel. Kaneshiro v. Huddy, 82 Hawaiʻi 188, 193, 921 P.2d 108, 113 (1996)), or that the Petitioner otherwise has a clear and indisputable right to relief and the lack of other means to redress the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action (see Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawaiʻi 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999)). A writ of mandamus is not intended to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the trial courts, or serve as a legal remedy in lieu of normal appellate procedures. Honolulu Advertiser, Inc. v. Takao, 59 Haw. 237, 241, 580 P.2d 58, 62 (1978). Therefore, It is ordered that the petition is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, July 20, 2023. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Kevin A.K. Souza /s/ Lisa W. Cataldo