Title: Kendrick v. Jones
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: SC17-679
State: Florida
Issuer: Florida Supreme Court
Date: January 25, 2018

Supreme Court of Florida 
 
 
____________ 
 
No. SC17-679 
____________ 
 
MICHAEL A. KENDRICK,  
Petitioner, 
 
vs. 
 
JULIE L. JONES, etc.,  
Respondent. 
 
[January 25, 2018] 
 
PER CURIAM. 
 
Michael A. Kendrick filed with the Court a pro se petition for writ of habeas 
corpus.1  It is the thirty-ninth pro se petition or notice that he has filed with this 
Court since 2006.  We dismissed Kendrick’s petition in this case and expressly 
retained jurisdiction to consider the imposition of sanctions.  See Kendrick v. 
Jones, No. SC17-679, 2017 WL 2391701, at *1 (Fla. June 2, 2017). 
 
In 2008, Kendrick was convicted of attempted second-degree murder and 
sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment by the Circuit Court for the Thirteenth 
                                          
 
 
1.  We have jurisdiction.  See art. V, § 3(b)(9), Fla. Const. 
 
 
- 2 - 
Judicial Circuit, in and for Hillsborough County, Florida, in case number 
292005CF013532000AHC.  His conviction and sentence were per curiam affirmed 
by the Second District Court of Appeal.  See Kendrick v. State, 36 So. 3d 668 (Fla. 
2d DCA 2010) (table).  Since his case became final, Kendrick has initiated 
numerous challenges to his conviction and sentence in the circuit and district 
courts, as well as in this Court.  In this Court alone, Kendrick has filed forty pro se 
petitions and notices.  This Court has never granted Kendrick any of the relief that 
he has sought in any of the petitions and notices that he has filed with this Court; 
each of Kendrick’s cases in this Court has been dismissed, denied, or transferred.2     
                                          
 
 
2.  See Kendrick v. State, No. SC17-1232, 2017 WL 2829191 (Fla. June 30, 
2017) (dismissing notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction); Kendrick v. State, 
No. SC16-1435, 2017 WL 225066 (Fla. Jan. 19, 2017) (dismissing mandamus 
petition); Kendrick v. Jones, No. SC16-1933, 2016 WL 6538662 (Fla. Nov. 3, 
2016) (transferring mandamus petition to the district court); Kendrick v. State, No. 
SC16-1982, 2016 WL 6462428 (Fla. Nov. 1, 2016) (dismissing notice to invoke 
discretionary jurisdiction); Kendrick v. State, No. SC16-1687, 2016 WL 5162601 
(Fla. Sept. 19, 2016) (dismissing mandamus petition); Kendrick v. Jones, No. 
SC16-1418, 2016 WL 4194777 (Fla. Aug. 9, 2016) (transferring habeas petition to 
the circuit court); Kendrick v. Jones, No. SC16-918, 2016 WL 3450456 (Fla. June 
6, 2016) (transferring habeas petition to the circuit court); Kendrick v. State, No. 
SC16-191, 2016 WL 1600823 (Fla. Apr. 21, 2016) (transferring mandamus 
petition to the district court); Kendrick v. Jones, No. SC16-524, 2016 WL 1183763 
(Fla. Mar. 24, 2016) (transferring habeas petition to the circuit court); Kendrick v. 
State, No. SC15-2118, 2016 WL 374448 (Fla. Jan 28, 2016) (dismissing notice to 
invoke discretionary jurisdiction); Kendrick v. State, 192 So. 3d 38 (Fla. 2015) 
(table) (denying mandamus petition); Kendrick v. State, 192 So. 3d 38 (Fla. 2015) 
(table) (denying mandamus petition); Kendrick v. State, 192 So. 3d 38 (Fla. 2015) 
(table) (dismissing mandamus petition); Kendrick v. State, No. SC15-1637 (Fla. 
Oct. 22, 2015) (transferring mandamus petition to the circuit court); Kendrick v. 
State, No. SC15-1572 (Fla. Oct. 16, 2015) (transferring mandamus petition to the 
 
 
- 3 - 
 
Kendrick’s petition in this case was no exception.  The petition was another 
challenge to his conviction and sentence, filed almost seven years after they 
became final.  We simultaneously dismissed Kendrick’s petition in this case and 
                                          
 
district court); Kendrick v. State, 173 So. 3d 963 (Fla. 2015) (table) (dismissing 
notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction); Kendrick v. Jones, 171 So. 3d 117 
(Fla. 2015) (table) (dismissing notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction); 
Kendrick v. James B. Nutter & Co., 163 So. 3d 510 (Fla. 2015) (table) (dismissing 
notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction); Kendrick v. Crews, No. SC14-1571 
(Fla. Sept. 22, 2014) (transferring mandamus petition to the circuit court); 
Kendrick v. James B. Nutter & Co., 157 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2014) (table) 
(dismissing notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction); Kendrick v. State, No. 
SC14-1384 (Fla. Aug. 13, 2014) (transferring mandamus petition to the circuit 
court); Kendrick v. Crews, 147 So. 3d 524 (Fla. 2014) (table) (dismissing notice to 
invoke discretionary jurisdiction); Kendrick v. Crews, No. SC14-1041 (Fla. June 6, 
2014) (transferring habeas petition to the circuit court); Kendrick v. State, 145 So. 
3d 825 (Fla. 2014) (table) (dismissing mandamus petition); Kendrick v. State, 143 
So. 3d 919 (Fla. 2014) (table) (dismissing notice to invoke discretionary 
jurisdiction); Kendrick v. State, No. SC14-65 (Fla. Mar. 17, 2014) (transferring 
mandamus petition to the district court); Kendrick v. Crews, No. SC14-249 (Fla. 
Mar. 12, 2014) (transferring habeas petition to the circuit court); Kendrick v. State, 
No. SC13-1422 (Fla. Dec. 16, 2013) (transferring mandamus petition to the district 
court); Kendrick v. Crews, No. SC13-1398 (Fla. Nov. 27, 2013) (transferring 
habeas petition to the circuit court); Kendrick v. State, 120 So. 3d 560 (Fla. 2013) 
(table) (dismissing mandamus petition); Kendrick v. State, 110 So. 3d 440 (Fla. 
2013) (table) (dismissing notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction); Kendrick v. 
State, 70 So. 3d 587 (Fla. 2011) (table) (dismissing mandamus petition); Kendrick 
v. Buss, 64 So. 3d 1260 (Fla. 2011) (table) (denying notice to invoke discretionary 
jurisdiction); Kendrick v. State, 64 So. 3d 679 (Fla. 2011) (table) (dismissing 
mandamus petition); Kendrick v. State, No. SC11-660 (Fla. Apr. 13, 2011) 
(transferring mandamus petition to the district court); Kendrick v. State, No. SC11-
336 (Fla. Feb. 23, 2011) (transferring mandamus petition to the district court); 
Kendrick v. State, No. SC10-1046 (Fla. Aug. 11, 2010) (transferring mandamus 
petition to the circuit court); Kendrick v. McNeil, No. SC09-2324 (Fla. Feb. 17, 
2010) (transferring habeas petition to the district court); Kendrick v. State, 944 So. 
2d 345 (Fla. 2006) (table) (denying notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction). 
 
 
- 4 - 
ordered him to show cause why he should not be barred from filing further pro se 
documents here.  He did not respond to the Court’s order, but instead chose to file 
yet another meritless notice to invoke this Court’s discretionary jurisdiction, which 
was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.  See Kendrick v. State, No. SC17-1232, 
2017 WL 2829191 (Fla. June 30, 2017).  Therefore, based on Kendrick’s extensive 
history of meritless pro se filings in this Court, most of which have challenged his 
conviction and sentence, we now find that he has abused the Court’s limited 
judicial resources.  See Pettway v. McNeil, 987 So. 2d 20, 22 (Fla. 2008) 
(explaining that this Court has previously “exercised the inherent judicial authority 
to sanction an abusive litigant” and that “[o]ne justification for such a sanction lies 
in the protection of the rights of others to have the Court conduct timely reviews of 
their legitimate filings”).  If no action is taken, Kendrick will continue to burden 
this Court’s resources.   
 
Accordingly, we direct the Clerk of this Court to reject any future pleadings 
or other requests for relief submitted by Michael A. Kendrick that concern circuit 
court case number 292005CF013532000AHC, unless such filings are signed by a 
member in good standing of The Florida Bar.  Henceforth, Kendrick may only 
petition the Court about his conviction and sentence in case number 
292005CF013532000AHC through the assistance of counsel whenever such 
counsel determines that the proceeding may have merit and can be filed in good 
 
 
- 5 - 
faith.  Additionally, we find the petition filed in this case by Kendrick is a frivolous 
proceeding filed by a state prisoner.  See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2017).  
Consistent with section 944.279(1), Florida Statutes (2017), we direct the Clerk of 
this Court to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the Department of 
Corrections’ institution or facility where Kendrick is incarcerated.  See Steele v. 
State, 14 So. 3d 221, 224 (Fla. 2009). 
 
No motion for rehearing or clarification will be entertained by the Court. 
 
It is so ordered. 
LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, 
and LAWSON, JJ., concur. 
 
Original Proceeding – Habeas Corpus 
 
Michael A. Kendrick, pro se, Raiford, Florida, 
 
for Petitioner 
 
No appearance for Respondent