Title: Correa v. State
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 563, 2004
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: September 20, 2005

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
GUANGO F. CORREA,  
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
No. 563, 2004 
 
Defendant Below,  
 
§ 
Appellant, 
 
 
§ 
Court Below--Superior Court 
 
 
 
§ 
of the State of Delaware, in and 
v. 
 
 
§ 
for Sussex County in S02-05- 
 
 
 
§ 
0001R5. 
STATE OF DELAWARE, 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
 
Plaintiff Below, 
 
 
§ 
 
Appellee. 
 
 
 
§ 
Def. ID No. 0204015491 
 
Submitted: June 21, 2005 
Decided: 
September 20, 2005 
 
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and BERGER, Justices.  
  
 
O R D E R 
 
 
This 20th day of September 2005, after careful consideration of the 
appellant's opening brief and the State's motion to affirm, we find it manifest 
that the judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of 
the Superior Court's decision dated December 9, 2004.1  The Superior Court 
did not err in concluding that the claims raised in the appellant's fifth motion 
for postconviction relief were either repetitive or were previously 
                                          
 
1 Supr. Ct. R. 25(a). 
 
2
adjudicated pursuant to Superior Court Criminal Rule 61, and that the 
appellant had not overcome those procedural hurdles.2 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the State's motion to 
affirm is GRANTED.  The judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Randy J. Holland 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice  
 
                                          
 
2 See Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(i)(2) (providing that any ground for relief that was not 
asserted in a prior postconviction proceeding is barred unless consideration of the claim 
is warranted in the interest of justice).  See Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(i)(4) (providing that 
any ground for relief that was formerly adjudicated is barred unless reconsideration of the 
claim is warranted in the interest of justice).