Title: Morrow Development Corp. v. American Bank and Trust Co.
Citation: 1991 OK 31, 61OBJ2723, 816 P.2d 537
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: April 1, 1991

Morrow Development Corp. v. American Bank and Trust Co. Annotate this Case Morrow Development Corp. v. American Bank and Trust Co. 1991 OK 31 816 P.2d 537 61 OBJ 2723 Case Number: 77034, 77128 Decided: 04/01/1991 Supreme Court of Oklahoma MORROW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, AN OKLAHOMA CORPORATION, AND DAVID GORDON MANAGEMENT, INC., AN OKLAHOMA CORPORATION, APPELLEES, v. AMERICAN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, AN OKLAHOMA BANKING CORPORATION, APPELLANT. MORROW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, AN OKLAHOMA CORPORATION, AND DAVID GORDON MANAGEMENT, INC., AN OKLAHOMA CORPORATION, PETITIONERS, v. THE HONORABLE RONALD SHAFFER, DISTRICT JUDGE, TULSA COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, AND AMERICAN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF TULSA, OKLAHOMA, A STATE BANKING CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS. ORDER ¶1 On the court's own motion, these matters are consolidated under surviving number 77,034. ¶2 Appellees' application to assume original jurisdiction, and petition for writs of prohibition and mandamus are treated as a quest for corrective relief ancillary to the above styled and numbered appeal. Because the court has appellate jurisdiction, an assumption of original jurisdiction is unnecessary. The trial court's order of January 28, 1991, granting a stay of execution without bond pursuant to Oklahoma Banking Board Rule IV-19 is vacated. The Legislature may not delegate to an administrative agency the power to amend or subvert a statute through administrative rules and regulations. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Welch, 446 P.2d 268 (Okl. 1968). Any stay of enforcement of the judgment from which this appeal is taken must comply with 12 O.S. 1990 Supp. § 1007 [90-1007]. ¶3 All Justices concur.