Title: Stidham v. Stidham
Citation: 86 So. 2d 294
Docket Number: N/A
State: Alabama
Issuer: Alabama Supreme Court
Date: March 22, 1956

86 So. 2d 294 (1956)
Beulah STIDHAM
v.
Forble Lee STIDHAM.
8 Div. 830.

Supreme Court of Alabama.
March 22, 1956.
Potts &amp; Young, Florence, for appellant.
Bradshaw, Barnett &amp; Haltom, Geo. E. Barnett, Jr., Florence, for appellee.
MERRILL, Justice.
Appellee sued appellant for a divorce, alleging cruelty. The trial court, after taking the testimony ore tenus, granted the divorce on that ground, awarded alimony to appellant and required appellee to pay an attorneys' fee for appellant under her cross bill. The only question presented on the merits is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the decree of divorce.
We have carefully considered the evidence in consultation and are of the opinion that it is adequate, if believed, to justify the decree granting the divorce. What was said in McEvoy v. McEvoy, 214 Ala. 112, 106 So. 602, 603, is applicable here:
*295 Appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because of the inadequacy of the single assignment of error, but we do not consider the motion. The failure to assign any errors or an inadequate assignment of errors requires the affirmance of the judgment below. Nichols v. Hardegree, 202 Ala. 132, 79 So. 598; Wetzel v. Hobbs, 249 Ala. 434, 31 So. 2d 639.
It is our conclusion that the cause should be and is affirmed on the merits.
Affirmed.
LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and GOODWYN, JJ., concur.