Title: HIGH v. UNITED STATES
Citation: 14 Okla. 399, 1904 OK 100, 78 P. 10 0
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: September 3, 1904

HIGH v. UNITED STATES Annotate this Case HIGH v. UNITED STATES 1904 OK 100 78 P. 100 14 Okla. 399 Decided: 09/03/1904 Supreme Court of Oklahoma DANIEL HIGH v. THE UNITED STATES, E. A. HITCHCOCK, Secretary of the Interior, W. A. RICHARDS, Assistant Commissioner of the General Land Office, F. C. SICKLES, Register, AND T. R. REID, Receiver of the U. S. Land Office at El Reno, Oklahoma Territory. Syllabus ¶0 APPEAL--Case Made. A case made which does not contain a copy or statement of the pleadings, any motion for a new trial, or any final order of judgment of the trial court, but merely a purported transcript of the stenographer's notes of the evidence, presents no question to this court for review. Error from the District Court of Canadian County; before Clinton F. Irwin, Trial Judge. Goodwin & Reid, for plaintiff in error. Horace Speed, United States Attorney, John W. Scothorn and Frank Hall, Assistant United States Attorneys, for defendants in error. BEAUCHAMP, J.: ¶1 This case comes here on appeal from the district court of Canadian county, sitting with the powers of a circuit court of the United States, under the provisions of the act of congress, approved February 6, 1901, 31 Statutes at Large, page 760. Attached to the petition in error is what purports to be a case made, which contains only the stenographer's transcript to the evidence. There are no pleadings shown in the record, no judgment or final order of the court, no motion for a new trial, and no record by which we can determine what the issues were or that any disposition was ever made of the case; merely a recital in the stenographer's transcript to the effect that upon the conclusion of the plaintiff's testimony, defendants demurred to the evidence, and the court sustained the demurrer, to which ruling the plaintiff excepted. The record is wholly insufficient to present such a case made as will enable this court to review the errors assigned by plaintiff in error. ¶2 See Board of Commissioners of Custer Co. v. Moon, 8 Okla. 205 , and cases cited. ¶3 The petition in error, therefore is dismissed, with costs to plaintiff in error. ¶4 Irwin, J., who presided in the court below, not sitting; Pancoast, J., absent; all the other Justices concurring.