Title: HILL v. CITY OF KINGFISHER
Citation: 136 P. 77 5, 1913 OK 656, 39 Okla. 782
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: November 18, 1913

HILL v. CITY OF KINGFISHER Annotate this Case HILL v. CITY OF KINGFISHER 1913 OK 656 136 P. 775 39 Okla. 782 Case Number: 3176 Decided: 11/18/1913 Supreme Court of Oklahoma HILL v. CITY OF KINGFISHER. Syllabus ¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Brief--Dismissal. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 95 P. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Cunningham & Weiss, for plaintiff in error. John T. Bradley, Jr., for defendant in error. ROBERTSON, C. ¶1 This appeal was filed in this court October 14, 1911. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 95 P. vi). Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490 , 126 P. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521 , 125 P. 1133; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491 , 126 P. 216; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759 , 127 P. 260; M., O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816 , 127 P. 386; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825 , 127 P. 260; Snow v. Frye, 34 Okla. 826 , 127 P. 422. ¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.