Title: State v. Skalicky
Citation: 2004 ND 1, 676 N.W.2d 813
Docket Number: 
State: north-dakota
Issuer: north-dakota Supreme Court
Date: January 14, 2004

State v. Skalicky Annotate this Case [Go to Documents]Filed Jan. 14, 2004[Download as WordPerfect]IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA2004 ND 1 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Thomas A. Skalicky, Defendant and Appellant Nos. 20030163-20030167 Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Gerald H. Rustad, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Nicole E. Foster (argued), State's Attorney, and Marlyce A. Wilder (appeared), Assistant State's Attorney, P.O. Box 2047, Williston, ND 58802-2047, for plaintiff and appellee. Kevin J. Chapman, Townsite Bldg., 2nd Fl., P.O. Box 1920, Williston, ND 58802-1920, for defendant and appellant. State v. Skalicky Nos. 20030163-20030167 Per Curiam. [¶1] Thomas Skalicky appeals the order of the district court denying his application for post-conviction relief. He argued his consecutive sentences for robbery under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-22-01 and burglary under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-22-02(2)(a) violated the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. Each offense to which Skalicky pleaded guilty "contains an element not contained in the other." City of Fargo v. Martin Sewall Hector, 534 N.W.2d 821, 823 (N.D. 1995)(citing United States v. Dixon, 509 U.S. 688 , 696 (1993), applying Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932)). Double jeopardy does not apply. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). [¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Carol Ronning Kapsner Dale V. Sandstrom William A. Neumann Mary Muehlen Maring