Title: HALL & BRISCOE Inc. v. ROBERTS
Citation: 163 Okla. 12, 1933 OK 182, 20 P.2d 188
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: March 21, 1933

HALL & BRISCOE Inc. v. ROBERTS Annotate this Case HALL & BRISCOE Inc. v. ROBERTS 1933 OK 182 20 P.2d 188 163 Okla. 12 Case Number: 23604 Decided: 03/21/1933 Supreme Court of Oklahoma HALL & BRISCOE, INC. v. ROBERTS, et al. Syllabus by the Court ¶0 1. "Instructions must be considered as a whole and construed together, and, while a single instruction standing alone may be subject to criticism, yet, when the instructions, when taken together in their entirety, fairly submit the issues to the jury, the judgment of the trial court on the verdict of the jury will not be disturbed. It is not necessary that any particular paragraph of the instructions contain all the law of the case; it is sufficient if, when taken together and considered as a whole, they fairly present the law applicable to the issues in the pleadings upon which competent evidence has been introduced." Bucktrot v. Partridge, Appeal from District Court, Oklahoma County; Sam Hooker, Judge. Action by Claude Roberts and another against Hall & Briscoe, Inc. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals. Judgment affirmed, and judgment rendered for plaintiffs on supersedeas bond. J. S. Ross, S. J. Clay, and Jas. H. Ross, all of Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error. L. V. Reid, H. V. Lewis, Rayford S. Reid, and C. D. Bennett, all of Oklahoma City, for defendants in error. CULLISON, Vice Chief Justice. ¶1 This case is a companion case of cause No. 23603, this day decided by this court. Hall & Briscoe, Inc., v. Strode, 20 P.(2d) 186. In the case at bar, plaintiffs instituted suit seeking to recover from defendant for medical expenses, hospital expenses, and other expenses incurred by them in caring for Harley Strode as a result of the accidental injury which is the basis of cause No. 23603. This case was consolidated with, and tried with, cause No. 23603. The law applicable to case No. 23603 is applicable to the case at bar, and is conclusive of the questions of law raised herein. Relying upon the authority of said case this day decided, the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed. ¶2 Defendants in error pray that judgment be rendered upon a supersedeas bond filed herein, and, in compliance with said request, judgment is hereby rendered in favor of defendants in error against plaintiff in error as principal, and its surety, Western Casualty & Surety Company, as surety, for the amount of the principal judgment of $795, with interest and costs in accordance with the tenor of the judgment rendered in said cause.