Title: City of Bismarck v. Perusquia
Citation: 2006 ND 207, 725 N.W.2d 588
Docket Number: 
State: north-dakota
Issuer: north-dakota Supreme Court
Date: October 17, 2006

City of Bismarck v. Perusquia Annotate this Case Filed Oct. 17, 2006 IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2006 ND 207 City of Bismarck, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Martin G. Perusquia, Defendant and Appellant No. 20060048 Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Wayne D. Goter, P.O. Box 1552, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-1552, for defendant and appellant; submitted on briefs. Paul H. Fraase, City Prosecutor, P.O. Box 5503, Bismarck, N.D. 58506-5503, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on briefs. City of Bismarck v. Perusquia No. 20060048 Per Curiam. [¶1] Martin Perusquia appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol. He argues the City of Bismarck did not present sufficient evidence to convict him. The record contains sufficient evidence to support the conviction; therefore, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). [¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Mary Muehlen Maring Daniel J. Crothers Dale V. Sandstrom Carol Ronning Kapsner