Title: YOUNG v. HENDERSON
Citation: 146 Okla. 11, 1930 OK 508, 292 P. 111 5
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: November 11, 1930

YOUNG v. HENDERSON Annotate this Case YOUNG v. HENDERSON 1930 OK 508 292 P. 1115 146 Okla. 11 Case Number: 19733 Decided: 11/11/1930 Supreme Court of Oklahoma YOUNG et al. v. HENDERSON et al. Syllabus ¶0 Wills--Costs in Contest Chargeable to Losing Contestant. The fees and expenses in a contest of the validity or probate of a will must be paid by the parties contesting the same if the will in probate be confirmed. Under those conditions, it is error to tax the same to the property of the decedent. Error from District Court, Carter County; Asa E. Walden, Judge. In the matter of probate of will of G. W. Young, deceased; Lucy Henderson et al., contestants. From order taxing costs to estate, Adaline Young and another, executors, et al., bring error. Revised and remanded, with directions. H. C. Potterf, Earl Q. Gray, and J. M. Poindexter, for plaintiffs in error. Wm. M. Franklin, J. A. Bass, H. A. Hicks, and Thomas W. Champion, for defendants in error. ANDREWS, J. ¶1 This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Carter county taxing to the estate the costs of an unsuccessful proceeding to revoke the probate of a will. ¶2 The governing statute is section 1120, C. O. S. 1921, which reads as follows: "The fees and expenses must be paid by the party contesting the validity or probate of the will, if the will in probate be confirmed. If the probate be annulled and revoked, the costs must be paid by the party who resisted the revocation, or out of the property of the decedent, as the court directs." ¶3 The probate of the will in question was confirmed. The costs were chargeable to the parties contesting the probate thereof and not to the estate. ¶4 It is urged that, inasmuch as Lou (Mattie Louise) Franklin was not given notice of the filing of the case-made in the office of the court clerk, the appeal should be dismissed. She was not one of the parties contesting the validity or probate of the will, and for that reason could not be liable for the costs. None of her rights would be affected by a reversal of the cause, and no notice to her was necessary. ¶5 The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the district court of Carter county, with directions to tax the costs of the proceeding, including the costs of this appeal, to the parties contesting the validity or probate of the will.