Title: SPAULDING MFG. CO. v. BUCKHOLTZ
Citation: 135 P. 105 2, 1913 OK 599, 40 Okla. 54
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: October 14, 1913

SPAULDING MFG. CO. v. BUCKHOLTZ Annotate this Case SPAULDING MFG. CO. v. BUCKHOLTZ 1913 OK 599 135 P. 1052 40 Okla. 54 Case Number: 5516 Decided: 10/14/1913 Supreme Court of Oklahoma SPAULDING MFG. CO. v. BUCKHOLTZ et al. Syllabus ¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Dismissal--Summons. Syllabus same as Watkins et al. v. Barnwell, 35 Okla. 205 , 128 P. 511. Moore & Bass, for plaintiff in error. Sigler & Howard, for defendants in error. ¶1 this case the demurrer of G. W. Buckholtz, defendant in error, was sustained to the petition of the plaintiff, Spaulding Manufacturing Company, February 27, 1913, and a motion for a new trial was overruled that same day in the trial court. Petition in error and case-made was filed in this court August 26, 1913, but there was no waiver of issuance and service of summons in error until August 29, 1913, or until after six months had expired from the date of the judgment. Neither was a praecipe for summons in error filed or summons issued thereon or a general appearance made within six months. This being the state of the record, the law in Watkins et al. v. Barnwell, 35 Okla. 205 , 128 P. 511, rules this case. The motion to dismiss is sustained, and the cause ordered dismissed. ¶2 All the Justices concur, except WILLIAMS, J., absent and not participating.