Title: Wilber v. Scaff
Citation: 2019 ND 281
Docket Number: 20190196
State: north-dakota
Issuer: north-dakota Supreme Court
Date: December 12, 2019

2019 ND ____ McKiley Wilber, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Sarah Scaff, Defendant and Appellee No. 20190196 Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable James S. Hill, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Jennifer M. Gooss, Beulah, N.D., for plaintiff and appellant. Matthew J. Arthurs, Bismarck, N.D., for defendant and appellee. 1 Per Curiam. McKiley Wilber appeals from a district court judgment granting Sarah Scaff primary residential responsibility of their child. On appeal, Wilber argues the district court’s findings were clearly erroneous. He also argues the district court abused its discretion by allocating to him all costs of transporting the child and by not taking judicial notice of the criminal history of Scaff’s former live-in boyfriend. We conclude the district court’s findings are not clearly erroneous and it did not abuse its discretion. Therefore, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). Wilber v. Scaff No. 20190196 Per Curiam. [¶1] McKiley Wilber appeals from a district court judgment granting Sarah Scaff primary residential responsibility of their child. On appeal, Wilber argues the district court’s findings were clearly erroneous. He also argues the district court abused its discretion by allocating to him all costs of transporting the child and by not taking judicial notice of the criminal history of Scaff’s former live-in boyfriend. We conclude the district court’s findings are not clearly erroneous and it did not abuse its discretion. Therefore, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jon J. Jensen