Title: MASSEY v. SINOPOULO
Citation: 151 P.2d 794, 1944 OK 249, 194 Okla. 355
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: September 19, 1944

MASSEY v. SINOPOULO Annotate this Case MASSEY v. SINOPOULO 1944 OK 249 151 P.2d 794 194 Okla. 355 Case Number: 31427 Decided: 09/19/1944 Supreme Court of Oklahoma MASSEY v. SINOPOULO Syllabus ¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--NEW TRIAL--Syllabus adopted. The syllabus in cause No. 31426, Cooke ete al. v. Sinopoulo, 194 Okla. 352 , 151 P.2d 791 , is adopted as the syllabus in this case. Appeal from District Court, Oklahoma County; Sam Hooker, Judge. Action was instituted by G. E. Massey to recover from John Sinopoulo an amount alleged to be due under an assignment of contract which had theretofore been entered into between John Sinopoulo and H. R. Hollenback. Judgment for plaintiff was vacated and a new trial granted and he appeals. Affirmed. Everest, McKenzie & Gibbens, of Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error. Halley, Douglass, Felix & Douglass, of Oklahoma City, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. ¶1 This is a companion case to that of Cooke et al. v. Sinopoulo, No. 31426, 194 Okla. 352 , 161 P.2d 791. The issues of law and fact are identical save for the name of the plaintiff in error and the amount involved. The same authorities are cited and the same contentions are made here as were made in the former case. What we have therein said is controlling here in every detail. For this reason the syllabus in the above case is adopted as the syllabus herein. ¶2 Judgment affirmed. ¶3 CORN, C.J., GIBSON, V.C.J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, HURST, and DAVISON, JJ., concur.