Title: State v. Sean M. Daley
Citation: 2006 WI 25
Docket Number: 2005AP000048-CR
State: Wisconsin
Issuer: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Date: March 16, 2006

2006 WI 25 
 
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 
 
 
 
 
 
CASE NO.: 
2005AP48-CR 
 
 
COMPLETE TITLE: 
 
 
State of Wisconsin, 
          Plaintiff-Respondent, 
     v. 
Sean M. Daley, 
          Defendant-Appellant. 
 
 
 
 
REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS 
2005 WI App 260 
Reported at:  ___ Wis. 2d ___, 709 N.W.2d 888 
(Ct. App. 2005-Published) 
 
 
OPINION FILED: 
March 16, 2006   
SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS: 
        
ORAL ARGUMENT: 
        
 
 
SOURCE OF APPEAL: 
 
 
COURT: 
Circuit   
 
COUNTY: 
Oconto   
 
JUDGE: 
Larry Jeske 
 
 
 
JUSTICES: 
 
 
CONCURRED: 
        
 
DISSENTED: 
        
 
NOT PARTICIPATING:         
 
 
 
ATTORNEYS: 
 
      
 
 
2006 WI 25
 
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NOTICE 
This order is subject to further 
editing and modification.  The 
final version will appear in the 
bound volume of the official 
reports.   
 
 
 
No.  2005AP48-CR  
 
 
State of Wisconsin, 
 
          Plaintiff-Respondent, 
 
     v. 
 
Sean M. Daley, 
 
          Defendant-Appellant. 
 
FILED 
 
MAR 16, 2006 
 
Cornelia G. Clark 
Clerk of Supreme Court 
Madison, WI 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Court entered the following order on this date: 
 
Defendant-appellant-petitioner, Sean M. Daley, has filed a 
petition for review.  The State has filed a response that the 
court of appeals’ decision in this case conflicts with binding 
precedent, State v. Barney, 213 Wis. 2d 344, 570 N.W.2d 731 (Ct. 
App. 1997).  Having considered the petition for review and the 
State’s response, 
 
IT IS ORDERED the petition for review is granted, the court 
of appeals’ decision is vacated and this matter is remanded to 
the court of appeals for further proceedings in light of Barney.   
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the proceedings in this court 
are held in abeyance pending remand, and while the appellate 
court conducts proceedings on remand, this court retains 
jurisdiction over the petition for review and the parties are 
instructed to inform this court of the outcome on remand. 
 
 
 
No.  2005AP48-CR 
 
2