Title: SAUERS v. TATE
Citation: 1898 OK 80, 54 P. 45 2, 7 Okla. 211
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: July 30, 1898

SAUERS v. TATE Annotate this Case SAUERS v. TATE 1898 OK 80 54 P. 452 7 Okla. 211 Decided: 07/30/1898 Supreme Court of Oklahoma P. SAUERS v. JOHN P. TATE et al SYLLABUS ¶0 APPEAL--Dismissal. Cause dismissed for failure to file briefs in compliance with the rule of the court. Error front the District Court of Noble County; before A. G. C. Bierer, District Judge. Action by P. Sauers against John P. Tate and others. From the judgment, Sauers brings error. Dismissed. H. B. Martin and James B. Diggs, for plaintiff in error Thomas H. Doyle, for defendant in error. MCATEE, J.: ¶1 No briefs have been filed in this cause, and since it is provided in the rules of practice in this court (rule 4, 5 Okla., v.) that "counsel shall file ten printed briefs in each case," and by rule 6, "In each civil case, counsel for plaintiff in error shall furnish a copy of his brief," etc., and, "in case of the failure to comply with the requirements of this rule, the court may continue, or dismiss the case, or affirm or reverse the judgment," the case will therefore be dismissed for failure to file briefs in the case in compliance with the rule. ¶2 All of the Justices concurring.