Title: Coady v. Dist. Atty. of Montgomery Cty. (Dissenting Opinion)
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 212 M.D. MISC. DKT. 1999
State: Pennsylvania
Issuer: Pennsylvania Supreme Court
Date: March 23, 2001

[J-87-00] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT JOSEPH COADY, Appellee v. DONALD T. VAUGHN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellants : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 212 M.D. Miscellaneous Docket 1999 On petition for certification of questions of law from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit SUBMITTED: March 14, 2000 DISSENTING OPINION MR. JUSTICE NIGRO DECIDED: March 22, 2001 Since I believe that a person seeking parole is entitled to limited appellate review of a Board order denying parole, as explained in my dissenting opinion in Rogers v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole, 724 A.2d 319 (Pa. 1999), I must respectfully dissent.