Title: Kenosha Hospital & Medical Center v. Jesus E. Garcia
Citation: 2004 WI 137
Docket Number: 2002AP001727
State: Wisconsin
Issuer: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Date: November 4, 2004

2004 WI 137 
 
 
 
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 
 
 
 
 
 
CASE NO.: 
02-1727 
COMPLETE TITLE: 
 
 
Kenosha Hospital & Medical Center,  
          Plaintiff-Respondent, 
 
     v. 
 
Jesus E. Garcia,  
          Defendant, 
 
Richter Industries, Inc.,  
          Garnishee-Defendant-Appellant- 
Petitioner. 
 
 
 
 
MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION 
2004 WI 105 
Reported at:  ___ Wis. 2d ___, 683 N.W.2d 425 
 
 
OPINION FILED: 
November 4, 2004   
SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS: 
        
ORAL ARGUMENT: 
        
 
 
SOURCE OF APPEAL: 
 
 
COURT: 
        
 
COUNTY: 
        
 
JUDGE: 
        
 
 
 
JUSTICES: 
 
 
CONCURRED: 
        
 
DISSENTED: 
        
 
NOT PARTICIPATING: BUTLER, J., did not participate.   
 
 
 
ATTORNEYS: 
 
      
 
 
2004 WI 137 
NOTICE 
This opinion is subject to further 
editing and modification.  The final 
version will appear in the bound 
volume of the official reports.   
No.  02-1727  
(L.C. No. 
01 CV 663) 
STATE OF WISCONSIN  
 
 
   : 
IN SUPREME COURT 
 
 
Kenosha Hospital & Medical Center,  
 
          Plaintiff-Respondent, 
 
     v. 
 
Jesus E. Garcia,  
 
          Defendant, 
 
Richter Industries, Inc.,  
 
          Garnishee-Defendant-Appellant- 
          Petitioner. 
 
FILED 
 
NOV 4, 2004 
 
Cornelia G. Clark 
Clerk of Supreme Court 
 
 
 
 
 
¶1 
PER CURIAM.  (on motion for clarification).  Richter 
Industries, Inc. petitions this court for clarification of our 
decision in Kenosha Hospital & Medical Center v. Garcia, 2004 WI 
105, ____ Wis. 2d ____, 683 N.W.2d 425, regarding directions 
upon remand.  Specifically, Richter asks this court to clarify 
the directions upon remand as to whether Kenosha Hospital should 
be allowed to conduct further discovery to support its claim 
that the notice of motion for judgment against Richter was 
properly served.  The court answers the question in the 
affirmative.   
No. 
02-1727   
 
2 
 
¶2 
The motion for clarification is granted, without 
costs. 
¶3 
LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J., did not participate.  
 
 
No. 
02-1727   
 
 
 
1