Title: VADA GROUP, LP v. JOHN L. GLASER, APRIL MARIE GLASER BERGERON, CHARITY ANN GLASER, PAULINE MARIE GLASER, ANGELLE ALINE GLASER, THEODORE H. GLASER, III, CYNTHIA LONG STEIB, CHARLES R. GLASER, AUDREY GLASER BROWNING, JOHN BURTON PRATHER, JEANETTE PRATHER HEINEN, GEORGIE FAY PRATHER, CYNTHIA PRATHER ROBERTSON, JOHNNIE PRATHER OLINGER, YVONNE PRATHER CRAMER, MICHAEL J. CRAMER, ANTHONY E. CRAMER, RHENA VIENNE CRAMER, BRENT BEAUVAIS, CYNTHIA MARIE BEAUVAIS, JODIE HENDERSON WILLIAMS, SR., CHARLES G. CHAUVIN, STACY MARIE CHAUVIN GUEHO, GRETCHEN ANN CHAUVIN ALLEMAN, JASON ANDREW CHAUVIN, ADAIR CHAUVIN CHUTZ, SHIRLEY BALLARD ELAM, FREDERICK DOMINGUE, MICHAEL NORTHERN, SYLVIA NORTHERN, BRENDA SAM AND DAVID MICHAEL MOYE
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 2012-C-2064
State: Louisiana
Issuer: Louisiana Supreme Court
Date: September 6, 2013

Supreme Court of Louisiana FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #051 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Per Curiam handed down on the 6th day of September, 2013, is as follows: PER CURIAM: 2012-C -2064 VADA GROUP, LP v. JOHN L. GLASER, APRIL MARIE GLASER BERGERON, CHARITY ANN GLASER, PAULINE MARIE GLASER, ANGELLE ALINE GLASER, THEODORE H. GLASER, III, CYNTHIA LONG STEIB, CHARLES R. GLASER, AUDREY GLASER BROWNING, JOHN BURTON PRATHER, JEANETTE PRATHER HEINEN, GEORGIE FAY PRATHER, CYNTHIA PRATHER ROBERTSON, JOHNNIE PRATHER OLINGER, YVONNE PRATHER CRAMER, MICHAEL J. CRAMER, ANTHONY E. CRAMER, RHENA VIENNE CRAMER, BRENT BEAUVAIS, CYNTHIA MARIE BEAUVAIS, JODIE HENDERSON WILLIAMS, SR., CHARLES G. CHAUVIN, STACY MARIE CHAUVIN GUEHO, GRETCHEN ANN CHAUVIN ALLEMAN, JASON ANDREW CHAUVIN, ADAIR CHAUVIN CHUTZ, SHIRLEY BALLARD ELAM, FREDERICK DOMINGUE, MICHAEL NORTHERN, SYLVIA NORTHERN, BRENDA SAM AND DAVID MICHAEL MOYE (Parish of Pointe Coupee) This writ application was granted to determine a single issue. A thorough review of the record and arguments reveals that issue is not properly before this court. Accordingly, we recall this writ application. WRIT GRANT RECALLED; WRIT DENIED. WEIMER, J., dissents and assigns reasons. 09/06/13 SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 2012-C-2064 VADA GROUP, LP VERSUS JOHN L. GLASER, APRIL MARIE GLASER BERGERON, CHARITY ANN GLASER, PAULINE MARIE GLASER, ANGELLE ALINE GLASER, THEODORE H. GLASER, III, CYNTHIA LONG STEIB, CHARLES R. GLASER, AUDREY GLASER BROWNING, JOHN BURTON PRATHER, JEANETTE PRATHER HEINEN, GEORGIE FAY PRATHER, CYNTHIA PRATHER ROBERTSON, JOHNNIE PRATHER OLINGER, YVONNE PRATHER CRAMER, MICHAEL J. CRAMER, ANTHONY E. CRAMER, RHENA VIENNE CRAMER, BRENT BEAUVAIS, CYNTHIA MARIE BEAUVAIS, JODIE HENDERSON WILLIAMS, SR., CHARLES G. CHAUVIN, STACY MARIE CHAUVIN GUEHO, GRETCHEN ANN CHAUVIN ALLEMAN, JASON ANDREW CHAUVIN, ADAIR CHAUVIN CHUTZ, SHIRLEY BALLARD ELAM, FREDERICK DOMINGUE, MICHAEL NORTHERN, SYLVIA NORTHERN, BRENDA SAM AND DAVID MICHAEL MOYE ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT, PARISH OF POINTE COUPEE PER CURIAM This writ application was granted to determine a single issue. A thorough review of the record and arguments reveals that issue is not properly before this court. Accordingly, we recall this writ application. WRIT GRANT RECALLED; WRIT DENIED. 09/06/13 SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA No. 12-C-2064 VADA GROUP, LP VERSUS JOHN L. GLASER, APRIL MARIE GLASER BERGERON, CHARITY ANN GLASER, PAULINE MARIE GLASER, ANGELLE ALINE GLASER, THEODORE H. GLASER, III, CYNTHIA LONG STEIB, CHARLES R. GLASER, AUDRY GLASER BROWNING, JOHN BURTON PRATHER, JEANETTE PRATHER HEINEN, GEORGIE FAY PRATHER, CYNTHIA PRATHER ROBERTSON, JOHNNIE PRATHER OLINGER, YVONNE PRATHER CRAMER, MICHAEL J. CRAMER, ANTHONY E. CRAMER, RHENA VIENNE CRAMER, BRENT BEAUVAIS, CYNTHIA MARIE BEAUVAIS, JODIE HENDERSON WILLIAMS, SR., CHARLES G. CHAUVIN, STACY MARIE CHAUVIN GUEHO, GRETCHIN ANN CHAUVIN ALLEMAN, JASON ANDREW CHAUVIN, ADAIR CHAUVIN CHUTZ, SHIRLEY BALLARD ELAM, FREDERICK DOMINGUE, MICHAEL NORTHERN, SYLVIA NORTHERN, BRENDA SAM, AND DAVID MICHAEL MOYE On Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Point Coupee WEIMER, J., dissents I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to recall the writ. Having granted the writ, I would resolve this case on the merits based on the issues and the record properly before this court.