Title: KING v. PALMER
Citation: 161 P. 82 1, 1916 OK 1030, 62 Okla. 299
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: December 19, 1916

KING v. PALMER Annotate this Case KING v. PALMER 1916 OK 1030 161 P. 821 62 Okla. 299 Case Number: 7711 Decided: 12/19/1916 Supreme Court of Oklahoma KING et al. v. PALMER et al. Error from District Court, Haskell County; W. H. Brown, Judge. Action between Rachel King and others and N.W. Palmer and others. There was judgment for the latter, and the former brings error. Reversed and remanded. G. A. Holley and E. D. Means, for plaintiffs in error. A. L. Beckett and J. E. Whitehead, for defendants in error. HOOKER, C. ¶1 Where the plaintiffs in error have briefed their cause, and the defendants in error have filed no brief, nor offered any excuse for a failure so to do, and the extension of time allowed them in which to file brief has expired, and the brief of plaintiffs in error indicates that there are errors in the record, and the authorities therein cited seem to support their contention, the cause will be reversed and remanded for a new trial. ¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.