Title: VGS, Inc. v. Castiel et al. and Virtual Geosatellite, LLC
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 564, 2000
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: May 23, 2001

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
VGS, INC.,
§
§
No. 564, 2000
Plaintiff Below, Appellant
§
§
v.
§
Court Below:  Court of
§
Chancery of the State of
DAVID CASTIEL, VIRTUAL
§
Delaware in and for
GEOSATELLITE HOLDINGS, INC.,
§
New Castle County
and ELLIPSO, INC.,
§
C.A. No. 17995
§
Defendants Below, Appellees. §
§
VGS, INC., PETER D. SAHAGEN
§
and SAHAGEN SATELLITE
§
TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC,
§
§
Counterclaim Defendants
§
Below, Appellants,
§
§
v. 
§
§
VIRTUAL GEOSATELLITE 
§
HOLDINGS, INC., and ELLIPSO, INC., §
§
Counterclaim Plaintiffs
§
Below, Appellees,
§
§
and
§
§
VIRTUAL GEOSATELLITE, LLC,
§
§
Counterclaim Plaintiff
§
Below, Appellee.
§
Submitted:  May 22, 2001
Decided:  May 23, 2001
Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and BERGER, Justices.
2
O R D E R
This 23rd day of May, 2001, the Court, having considered the
decision of the Court of Chancery dated August 31, 2000, and the briefs
and arguments of the parties, has determined that:  to the extent the issues
raised on appeal are factual, the record evidence supports the trial judge’s
factual findings; to the extent the errors alleged on appeal are attributed to
an abuse of discretion, the record does not support those assertions; and to
the extent that the issues raised on appeal are legal, they are controlled by
settled Delaware law, which was properly applied.  Accord Schnell v.
Chris-Craft Industries, Inc., Del.Supr., 285 A.2d 437 (1971);
Rossdeutscher v. Viacom, Inc., Del.Supr., 768 A.2d 8 (2001).
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the
Court of Chancery Court be, and the same hereby is
AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Carolyn Berger
Justice