Title: Lundeen, et al. v. Pricewaterhouse Coopers
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 474, 2005
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: November 2, 2005

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
ARTHUR (GREG) LUNDEEN III, 
RICHARD FRENCH and JAMES 
M. CHAMBERLAIN, 
 
Plaintiffs Below- 
Appellants, 
 
v. 
 
PRICEWATERHOUSE COOPERS, 
LLC, 
 
Defendant Below- 
Appellee. 
§ 
§ 
§  No. 474, 2005 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below—Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware, 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§  C.A. No. 04C-03-200 
§ 
§ 
§ 
 
Submitted: October 14, 2005 
Decided: 
November 2, 2005 
 
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND, and RIDGELY, Justices. 
 
 
O R D E R 
 
This 2nd day of November 2005, it appears to the Court that: 
(1) 
The plaintiffs below have petitioned this Court, pursuant to 
Supreme Court Rule 42, to appeal from an interlocutory order of the Superior 
Court dated September 6, 2005.  The Superior Court’s ruling denied the 
plaintiffs’ motion for discovery sanctions and denied the plaintiffs’ fourth 
motion to supplement the report of their expert. 
(2) 
On October 6, 2005, the Superior Court denied the plaintiffs’ 
application to certify an interlocutory appeal to this Court. 
 
 
-2-
(3) 
Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound 
discretion of this Court and are granted only in extraordinary cases. 
(4) 
In the exercise of its discretion, this Court has concluded that the 
application for interlocutory review does not meet the requirements of Supreme 
Court Rule 42(b) and should be refused. 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the within 
interlocutory appeal is REFUSED.   
BY THE COURT: 
 
/s/ Myron T. Steele 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chief Justice