Title: State v. Marshall
Citation: 695 So. 2d 686
Docket Number: 88774
State: Florida
Issuer: Florida Supreme Court
Date: June 5, 1997

695 So. 2d 686 (1997)
STATE of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
Burt MARSHALL, Respondent.
No. 88774.

Supreme Court of Florida.
June 5, 1997.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Fleur J. Lobree and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorneys General, Miami, for Petitioner.
Laurie D. Hall, Tavernier, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
We review State v. Marshall, 695 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), in which the court certified direct conflict with State v. Riley, 617 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, sections 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution.
In construing section 316.066, Florida Statutes (Supp.1988), this Court has stated:
State v. Norstrom, 613 So. 2d 437, 440-41 (Fla.1993). We cannot say that the 1991 amendments to that statute and section 316.062, Florida Statutes (Supp.1988), affect our holding in Norstrom. If the legislature had intended to eliminate the statutory requirement that drivers give accident reports to investigating officers, it would have said so in clearer language.
*687 Accordingly, we approve the decision of the court below, adopt its opinion as our own, and disapprove State v. Riley.
It is so ordered.
KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.