Title: DIXON v. WINGFIELD
Citation: 139 Okla. 12, 1929 OK 388, 280 P. 107 1
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: October 1, 1929

DIXON v. WINGFIELD Annotate this Case DIXON v. WINGFIELD 1929 OK 388 280 P. 1071 139 Okla. 12 Case Number: 17307 Decided: 10/01/1929 Supreme Court of Oklahoma DIXON v. WINGFIELD. Syllabus Commissioners' Opinion, Division No. 2. Error from Court of Common Pleas, Tulsa County; Saul A. Yager, Judge. Action between R. J. Dixon and Nannie Wingfield. An appeal from an order overruling a motion to vacate and set aside order dismissing cause of action. Reversed and remanded. J. T. Lewellen, for plaintiff in error. HALL, C. ¶1 Where the defendant in error has failed to file a brief, as provided for in rule 7 of the Supreme Court, or failed to give the court any excuse for such failure, and the brief of plaintiff in error reasonably sustains his assignments of error, the Supreme Court will not search the record to find some theory on which the judgment of the trial court, in favor of defendant in error, may be sustained.