Title: Sandoval v. Department of Transportation
Citation: 2008 ND 22, 747 N.W.2d 136
Docket Number: 
State: north-dakota
Issuer: north-dakota Supreme Court
Date: February 21, 2008

Sandoval v. Department of Transportation Annotate this Case [Go to Documents]Filed Feb. 21, 2008[Download as WordPerfect]IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA2008 ND 22 William Sandoval, Petitioner and Appellant v. Department of Transportation, Respondent and Appellee No. 20070295 Appeal from the District Court of Stark County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Allan L. Schmalenberger, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Kelly M. Armstrong (appeared) and Ashley Holmes (argued), third-year law student, of Reichert Armstrong Law Office, 513 Elks Drive, Dickinson, N.D. 58601, for petitioner and appellant. Andrew Moraghan (argued), Assistant Attorney General, Office of Attorney General, 500 N. 9th St., Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4509, for respondent and appellee. Sandoval v. Department of Transportation No. 20070295 Per Curiam. [¶1] William Sandoval appeals from a district court judgment affirming a North Dakota Department of Transportation order revoking Sandoval's driving privileges for three years. Sandoval argued the arresting officer did not have reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop his vehicle. We conclude the agency's order is supported by a preponderance of the evidence and summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Mary Muehlen Maring Daniel J. Crothers Dale V. Sandstrom Carol Ronning Kapsner