Title: Duchac v. State
Citation: 292 So. 2d 139
Docket Number: N/A
State: Alabama
Issuer: Alabama Supreme Court
Date: February 28, 1974

292 So. 2d 139 (1974)
In re David DUCHAC
v.
STATE. Ex parte David Duchac.
SC 709.

Supreme Court of Alabama.
February 28, 1974.
*140 Elno A. Smith, Jr., Montgomery, for petitioner.
No brief for the state, respondent.
BLOODWORTH, Justice.
We deny this petition for the sole reason that it is insufficient in that it does not comply with the provisions of our Rule 39, as interpreted by our case law. It merely makes the bare-bones assertion of a "conflict with a prior decision of this Court on the same point of law." There is no averment as to what portion of the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals conflicts with which decision of our Court. Nor are we advised with what part of a decision of our Court there is a conflict.
Again, we point out as we have heretofore done, first on November 7, 1969, in Ex parte State ex rel. Attorney General (In Re Clarence Stallworth v. State of Alabama), 285 Ala. 72, 229 So. 2d 27, viz.:
Ex parte State ex rel. Attorney General, 285 Ala. 72, 229 So. 2d 27 (1969).
Writ denied.
HEFLIN, C. J., and COLEMAN, McCALL and JONES, JJ., concur.