Title: State v. Klamm
Citation: 2013 ND 208
Docket Number: 
State: north-dakota
Issuer: north-dakota Supreme Court
Date: November 21, 2013

State v. Klamm Annotate this Case Court Description: Criminal judgment after a defendant conditionally pled guilty to driving under the influence is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2013 ND 208 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Andrew Neal Klamm, Defendant and Appellant No. 20130136 Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonja Clapp, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Faye A. Jasmer, Assistant State's Attorney, and Jared J. Wall, under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, 124 South Fourth Street, P.O. Box 5607, Grand Forks, N.D. 58206-5607, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. David C. Thompson, 321 Kittson Avenue, P.O. Box 5235, Grand Forks, N.D. 58206-5235, for defendant and appellant. State v. KlammNo. 20130136 Per Curiam. [¶1] Andrew Klamm appeals from a judgment entered after the district court denied his motion to suppress evidence and he entered a conditional guilty plea to driving under the influence. Klamm argues law enforcement stopped his vehicle without reasonable suspicion he was violating the law. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), concluding law enforcement had reasonable suspicion to make the stop. [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Dale V. Sandstrom Daniel J. Crothers Mary Muehlen Maring Carol Ronning Kapsner