Title: PRAIRIE OIL & GAS CO. v. PICKETT Co. Treas.
Citation: 100 Okla. 288, 1924 OK 744, 229 P. 25 8
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: September 16, 1924

PRAIRIE OIL & GAS CO. v. PICKETT Co. Treas. Annotate this Case PRAIRIE OIL & GAS CO. v. PICKETT Co. Treas. 1924 OK 744 229 P. 258 100 Okla. 288 Case Number: 11792 Decided: 09/16/1924 Supreme Court of Oklahoma PRAIRIE OIL & GAS CO. v. PICKETT, Co. Treas. Syllabus ¶0 Appeal and Error--Absence of Answer Brief--Reversal. Where the defendant in error fails to file brief and the brief of the plaintiff in error appears reasonably to support the assignments of error, the Judgment of the trial court will be reversed. Commissioners' Opinion, Division No. 2. Error from District Court, Creek County; Lucien B. Wright, Judge. Action by the Prairie Oil & Gas Company, a corporation, against Enos R. Pickett, County Treasurer of Creek County, to recover excess taxes paid under protest. Judgment was for defendant. Plaintiff appeals. Reversed. T. J. Flannelly, Paul B. Mason, and West, Sherman, Davidson & Moore, for plaintiff in error. Tom Wallace, Co. Atty., and Wayne H. Lasater, Asst. Co. Atty., for defendant in error. ESTES, C. ¶1 Pursuant to the order of this court duly given, plaintiff in error filed brief. No brief has been filed by defendant in error and no reason assigned for such failure. When the brief of plaintiff in error appears reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, this court will not search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment may be sustained. The brief of plaintiff in error complies with said rule. The judgment of the trial court is therefore reversed and the cause remanded with direction to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff in error.