Title: CHAMBERS v. SAVAGE
Citation: 183 Okla. 630, 1938 OK 316, 83 P.2d 857
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: May 10, 1938

CHAMBERS v. SAVAGE Annotate this Case CHAMBERS v. SAVAGE 1938 OK 316 83 P.2d 857 183 Okla. 630 Case Number: 27353 Decided: 05/10/1938 Supreme Court of Oklahoma CHAMBERS v. SAVAGE Syllabus ¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR - Dismissal Where Appeal Abandoned. Where, after the filing of a petition in error, the plaintiffs in error abandon the appeal and seek relief in another court, this court may, in its discretion, dismiss the appeal. Appeal from District Court, Osage County; Jesse J. Worten, Judge. Action involving an interest in the estate of Charles West, deceased. From a judgment in favor of Sophia West Savage, Lucinda West Chambers et al. appeal. Dismissed. Charles R. Gray, W.N. Palmer, and G.K. Sutherland, for plaintiffs in error. L.A. Justus, Jr., and J.P. Devine, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. ¶1 This action involves the contest of the will of a deceased Osage Indian which has been duly approved by the Department of Interior. The petition in error with case-made attached was filed in this court July 29, 1936. On July 25, 1937, a motion to remand on the ground of a compromise with the said Sophia West Savage was presented to the court and denied. On October 18, 1937, the plaintiffs in error filed a motion stating that they have proceeded in the district court of Osage county to attempt to enforce the alleged compromise agreement, and as the basis of such action they move this court to suspend the proceedings in this cause until such time as the proceedings in the district court have been determined. ¶2 We are of the opinion, and hold, that the cause must be dismissed as the appeal has been abandoned. Buckley v. Kelley, 126 Okla. 20 , 257 P. 1107. In that case it is held: "Where a party after his appeal to this court causes an action to be instituted in the United States District Court, involving the same parties and the identical subject matter, the filing of such action in the latter court will be deemed to be an abandonment of the appeal in this court, and on proper motion, the appeal will be dismissed." ¶3 We think it entirely inconsistent with an appeal in this court to allege that the parties have compromised and agreed upon a settlement thereof. Either that fact is true or untrue, and only a determination thereof in the trial court will disclose that fact. Such constitutes an abandonment of the appeal in this court. ¶4 The appeal is dismissed.