Title: Aadil Ashfaque v. State of Indiana
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 49S02-1505-CR-288
State: Indiana
Issuer: Indiana Supreme Court
Date: October 7, 2015

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT 
Mark W. Rutherford 
Stephen R. Donham 
Indianapolis, Indiana 
 
 
 
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE 
Gregory F. Zoeller 
Attorney General of Indiana 
 
Ellen H. Meilaender 
Deputy Attorney General 
Indianapolis, Indiana 
 
 
In the 
Indiana Supreme Court  
No. 49S02-1505-CR-288 
AADIL ASHFAQUE, 
Appellant (Defendant below), 
v. 
STATE OF INDIANA, 
Appellee (Plaintiff below). 
Appeal from the Marion Superior Court, No. 49G14-1305-FD-29521 
The Honorable Jose Salinas, Judge 
On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 49A02-1404-CR-286 
 
 October 7, 2015 
Massa, Justice. 
Aadil Ashfaque appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss charges of dealing 
in and possession of a synthetic drug, namely XLR11 [(1-(5-fluoropentyl)indol-3-yl)-(2,2,3,3-
tetramethylcyclopropyl)methanone].  For the reasons set forth in our companion decision of 
Tiplick v. State, also issued today, we find no constitutional or statutory infirmity to these charges, 
but nevertheless dismiss them due to the inadequacy of the charging information, and remand to 
the trial court for all other proceedings consistent with that opinion.  
Rush, C.J., and Dickson, Rucker, and David, JJ., concur. 
Oct 07 2015, 10:46 am