Title: DURHAM v. BROWN
Citation: 164 Okla. 139, 1933 OK 396, 24 P.2d 295
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: June 20, 1933

DURHAM v. BROWN Annotate this Case DURHAM v. BROWN 1933 OK 396 24 P.2d 295 164 Okla. 139 Case Number: 22267 Decided: 06/20/1933 Supreme Court of Oklahoma DURHAM v. BROWN Syllabus ¶0 Appeal and Error--Reversal--Failure of Defendant in Error to File Brief. Where plaintiff in error has served and filed its brief in compliance with the rules of court, and the defendant in error has neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse for his failure to do so, the court is not required to search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment of the trial court may be sustained, but may, where the authorities cited in the brief filed, appear reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, reverse the cause, with directions. Appeal from District Court, Oklahoma County; Lucius Babcock, Judge. Action by M. E. Durham et al. against Adelbert Brown et al. to recover money Judgment for funds held by the City Audit Company. From a judgment for the defendants, plaintiffs appeal. Reversed and remanded, with directions. Armstrong & Murphy and Sam Gill, for plaintiffs in error. A. M. Beets, D. T. McConnell, Adelbert Brown, and Lewis R. Morris, Co. Atty., for defendants in error. OPINION: PER CURIAM. ¶1 On April 7, 1931, plaintiff in error filed case-made with petition in error in this court, and on November 3, 1931, the brief was filed by plaintiff in error.