Title: MERCHANTS SOUTHWEST TRANSFER & STORAGE CO. v. WOODRUFF
Citation: 1923 OK 924, 220 P. 33 7, 93 Okla. 162
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: November 6, 1923

MERCHANTS SOUTHWEST TRANSFER & STORAGE CO. v. WOODRUFF Annotate this Case MERCHANTS SOUTHWEST TRANSFER & STORAGE CO. v. WOODRUFF 1923 OK 924 220 P. 337 93 Okla. 162 Case Number: 12497 Decided: 11/06/1923 Supreme Court of Oklahoma MERCHANTS SOUTHWEST TRANSFER & STORAGE CO. v. WOODRUFF. Syllabus ¶0 Appeal and Error -- Absence of Answer Brief -- Review. Where the plaintiff in error has filed a brief, and the defendant in error has filed none, and has given no excuse for his failure. and upon the examination of the record it appears that the errors assigned are well founded, this court is not required to search for some theory, or for some authority, that might possibly save the judgment appealed from. Gasper Edwards, for plaintiff in error. Albert L. McRill, for defendant in error. DICKSON, C. ¶1 This case was tried in the county court of Oklahoma county, on the 15th day of December, 1920, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant in error, R. A. Woodruff, and, against the plaintiff in error, Merchants Southwest Transfer & Storage Company. Motion for a new trial in the lower court was overruled and within the time allowed by law, the plaintiff in error perfected its appeal to this court by filing its petition in error with case-made attached: On the 31st day of July, the attorney for the defendant in error accepted service of the plaintiff in error's brief, and on the same day said brief was filed in this court. The defendant in error has filed no brief and no extension of time has been granted, and no excuse is shown why such brief has not been filed. ¶2 We have examined the errors assigned in the brief of the plaintiff in error and the record upon which they are predicated, and the grounds urged for a reversal appear to be well taken. Where such a situation arises as presented in this case, we are not required to search the record for reasons why the judgment should be upheld, neither are we required to search for authorities in support of the judgment appealed from. Upon the authority of Miles v. Bird, 41 Okla. 428 , 138 P. 789, and Walker v. Robinson, 66 Okla. 56, 166 P. 1042, the judgment appealed from will be reversed in accordance with the prayer of the petition in error and the cause remanded