Title: Denston v. State
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 167, 2004
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: August 13, 2004

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
GREGORY A. DENSTON, 
 
 
Defendant Below- 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
STATE OF DELAWARE, 
 
Plaintiff Below- 
Appellee. 
§ 
§ 
§  No. 167, 2004 
§ 
§  Court Below—Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware, 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§  Cr.A. No. IN97-12-0863 and 
§  -0864 
§    
§   
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: June 15, 2004 
 
 
 
 
  Decided: August 13, 2004 
 
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND, and JACOBS, Justices. 
 
O R D E R 
 
This 13th day of August 2004, after careful consideration of the 
appellant’s opening brief and the State’s motion to affirm, we find it 
manifest that the judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the 
basis of the Superior Court=s well-reasoned decision dated April 16, 2004.  
The Superior Court did not err in concluding that Denston’s motion for 
postconviction relief was both time-barred and repetitive and that Denston 
had failed to overcome these procedural hurdles.1  
                                          
 
1 See Del. Super. Ct. R. 61(i)(1), (4). 
 
2
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the 
Superior Court is AFFIRMED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Jack B. Jacobs  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice