Title: COMMERCE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY v. STUTES
Citation: 1954 OK 351, 277 P.2d 995
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: December 14, 1954

COMMERCE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY v. STUTES Annotate this Case COMMERCE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY v. STUTES 1954 OK 351 277 P.2d 995 Case Number: 36323 Decided: 12/14/1954 Supreme Court of Oklahoma COMMERCE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. NICK STUTES, DEFENDANT IN ERROR. Syllabus by the Court ¶0 Where plaintiff in error has served and filed its brief in compliance with the rules of court, and the defendant in error has neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse for his failure to do so, the court is not required to search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment of the trial court may be sustained, but may, where the authorities cited in the brief filed appear reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, reverse the cause, with directions. Appeal from the District Court, Creek County, Kenneth Hughes, J. Ungerman, Whitebook, Grabel & Ungerman, William Leiter, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error. Wallace & Wallace, Sapulpa, for defendant in error. O'NEAL, J. ¶1 On the 15th day of January, 1954, plaintiff in error filed case-made with petition in error in this court and on May 1, 1954, filed its brief. The authorities cited therein reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has failed to file a brief or offer any excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances it is not the duty of this court to search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment of the trial court may be sustained, but may, where the authorities cited in the brief appear reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, reverse the cause with directions. Durham v. Brown, 164 Okl. 139, 24 P.2d 295. ¶2 The cause is reversed and remanded with directions to vacate the judgment entered for defendant and enter order granting plaintiff a new trial.