Title: STATE SAV. BANK OF MANCHESTER v. BEDDEN
Citation: 134 P. 2 0, 1913 OK 459, 38 Okla. 444
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: July 8, 1913

STATE SAV. BANK OF MANCHESTER v. BEDDEN Annotate this Case STATE SAV. BANK OF MANCHESTER v. BEDDEN 1913 OK 459 134 P. 20 38 Okla. 444 Case Number: 4609 Decided: 07/08/1913 Supreme Court of Oklahoma STATE SAVINGS BANK OF MANCHESTER, IOWA, v. BEDDEN et al. Syllabus ¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Petition in Error--Time of Filing--Jurisdiction. Where more than six months has intervened between the rendition of the final order sought to be reviewed and the filing of the petition in error in the Supreme Court, this court has no Jurisdiction to review such final order. D. W. Tracey, for plaintiff in error. E. L. Mitchell, for defendants in error. TURNER, J. ¶1 This case presents error from the district court of Roger Mills county. The judgment herein was rendered on the 13th day of December, 1911, and the petition in error was filed in this court December 3, 1912, almost a year after the rendition of final judgment in the trial court. An act approved February 14, 1911, Session Laws 1910-11, p. 35, provides: "All proceedings for reversing, vacating or modifying judgments, or final orders shall be commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of." ¶2 This is jurisdictional; and where, as here, more than six months has elapsed, this court is without authority to review the action of the trial court. Wedd v. Gates, 15 Okla. 602 , 82 P. 808; Tishomingo Elec., etc., Co. v. Harris, 28 Okla. 10 , 113 P. 713; Fairbanks-Morse & Co. v. Thurmond et al., 31 Okla. 612 , 122 P. 167; Healy v. Davis, 32 Okla. 296 , 122 P. 157. The proceeding is therefore dismissed. ¶3 HAYES, C. J., and KANE, J., concur; WILLIAMS and DUNN, JJ., absent and not participating.