Title: Wilkerson v. State
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 264, 2018
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: September 17, 2018

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
QUENTIN A. WILKERSON, 
 
Defendant Below, 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
STATE OF DELAWARE, 
 
Plaintiff Below, 
Appellee. 
§ 
§   
§  No. 264, 2018 
§ 
§  Court Below—Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware 
§ 
§  Cr. ID No. 1306023969 (S) 
§   
§   
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: August 1, 2018 
 
 
 
 
 
Decided: 
September 17, 2018 
 
Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices. 
 
O R D E R 
 
 
After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion 
to affirm, and the record on appeal on appeal, we conclude that the Superior Court’s 
letter decision denying the appellant’s motion for modification of sentence should 
be affirmed.  Although the appellant’s motion indicated that he went through 
Probation and Parole and his treatment provider in preparing the motion, there was 
no sign that Probation and Parole or his treatment provider supported the motion.  
As to the appellant’s reliance on the results of a recent polygraph test to support his 
position, that test occurred after the Superior Court denied the motion.  The Superior 
2 
 
Court did not have the opportunity to consider those results and we will not consider 
them for the first time on appeal.1 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is 
GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Karen L. Valihura 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice 
                                                 
1 Supr. Ct. R. 8.