Title: Ramunno & Ramunno, P.A. v. Lundy Law, L.L.P.
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 366, 2018
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: February 18, 2019

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
RAMUNNO & RAMUNNO, P.A. 
§ 
INTERVENOR IN  
 
 
§ 
(C.A. No: N15C-03-060,  
 
§ 
No. 366, 2018 
 GILES v. BOYKIN-BOYD) 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
Court Below:  Superior Court 
 
Appellant,  
 
 
§ 
of the State of Delaware  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
 
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
§ 
C.A. No. N15C-03-060  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
 
LUNDY LAW, L.L.P. 
 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
 
Appellees.  
 
 
§ 
 
Submitted: February 6, 2019 
Decided: 
February 18, 2019  
Before VAUGHN, SEITZ, and TRAYNOR, Justices. 
 
O R D E R 
 
 
(1) 
Ramunno and Ramunno, P.A. (“Ramunno”) appeals from a Superior 
Court order awarding 15% of a fee collected by Lundy Law in a personal injury 
action in which Ramunno’s former client was the plaintiff. 
 
(2) 
Ramunno claims that the award was “unreasonable, unfair and arbitrary 
and not the result of a reasonable, articulate and rational process”1 because the 
Superior Court failed to adequately explain the basis for its opinion. 
                                         
1 Op. Br. at 3. 
 
(3) 
We are satisfied that the Superior Court considered the relevant factors 
in makings its determination that Ramunno was entitled on a quantum meruit basis 
to 15% —or $6,000.00—of Lundy Law’s 40% contingency fee. 
 
(4) 
We therefore affirm the Superior Court’s judgment on the basis of and 
for the reasons stated in its June 1, 2018 opinion2 and June 19, 2018 order3 granting 
in part and denying in part Ramunno’s motion for reargument. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 
Court be AFFIRMED.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Gary F. Traynor 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice 
                                         
2 Giles v. Boykin-Brown, 2018 WL 2464873 (Del. Super. June 1, 2018). 
3 Giles v. Boykin-Brown, N15C-03-060 (Del. Super. June 19, 2018) Dkt. No. 48.