Title: FIRST STATE BANK OF OILTON v. O'BANNON
Citation: 128 Okla. 16, 1927 OK 403, 260 P. 106 2
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: November 8, 1927

FIRST STATE BANK OF OILTON v. O'BANNON Annotate this Case FIRST STATE BANK OF OILTON v. O'BANNON 1927 OK 403 260 P. 1062 128 Okla. 16 Case Number: 18371 Decided: 11/08/1927 Supreme Court of Oklahoma FIRST STATE BANK OF OILTON et al. v. O'BANNON. Syllabus ¶0 Appeal and Error--Case-Made Signed and Settled Without Notice a Nullity. Where a case-made is settled and signed without notice of the time of the settlement of the case-made being given or waived and no stipulation entered into as to the correctness of the same and no appearance by the opposite party, either in person or by counsel, such case-made is a nullity and brings nothing before this court for review. Error from District Court, Creek County; Fred A. Speakman, Judge. Action between the First State Bank of Oilton et al., and Frank O'Bannon. From judgment in favor of the latter, the former appeal. Dismissed. Creekmore Wallace, for plaintiffs in error. Robson & Moreland and Hughes, Foster & Ellinghausen, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM ¶1 This is an attempt to appeal from a judgment of the trial court rendered on the 18th day of February, 1927. Case-made was served upon the defendant in error on the 9th day of May, 1927, and settled and signed by the trial judge on the 17th day of May, 1927. No amendments were suggested by the defendant in error; no notice of time and place of settlement was served by the plaintiffs in error upon the defendant in error nor was such notice waived upon the part of the defendant in error; no stipulation entered into as to the correctness of the case-made, and it is not shown that the defendant in error appeared before the trial judge at the time and place at which the case-made was settled. ¶2 The defendant in error has filed herein his motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that no notice of settling of case-made was ever given to defendant in error and no stipulation as to the correctness of the case, or waiver of notice of time and place of signing and settling of case-made, was ever entered into between the parties in this action. ¶3 This motion is well taken. This court in the case of Carr v. St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co., 118 Okla. 223 , 247 P. 38, laid down the rule that: "Where the appellant presents a case-made to the trial judge and has the same settled and signed without giving the required notice, in the absence of an appearance or waiver on the part of the appellee, such case-made so settled cannot be considered in this court, and the appeal will be dismissed."