Title: CAMPBELL SPECIALTY CO. INC. v. HACKER
Citation: 2010 OK 87
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: December 14, 2010

CAMPBELL SPECIALTY CO. INC. v. HACKER Annotate this Case CAMPBELL SPECIALTY CO. INC. v. HACKER 2010 OK 87 Case Number: 106572 Decided: 12/14/2010 THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE PERMANENT LAW REPORTS. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. CAMPBELL SPECIALTY CO., INC., and COMPSOURCE OKLAHOMA Petitioners, STEPHEN HACKER and THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION COURT, Respondents. ON CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS DIVISION III ¶0 Claimant/Respondent, Stephen Hacker, seeks review of an opinion of the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals, Division III, granting employer's statute-of-limitation defense. We granted Respondent's Petition for Certiorari. CERTIORARI PREVIOUSLY GRANTED; OPINION OF THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS VACATED; WORKERS' COMPENSATION COURT ORDER SUSTAINED. Steve A. Weeks, McCLURE LAW FIRM, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Petitioner. J. Kord Hammert, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Respondent Stephen Hacker. HARGRAVE, J. ¶1 This proceeding concerns provisions of In the present matter, the amendment in question brings §43 squarely within the special law prohibition of Art. 5, §46. The classification of injured employees on the basis of continued versus terminated employment is a false and deficient classification of the larger class of injured employees because it creates preference for members in the continued employment group and results in unequal treatment for certain members of the terminated group that bear no reasonable relationship to curtailing retaliatory claims or preventing stale claims. Hence, we find the action of the Legislature to be unreasonable in their creation of this particular statutory classification. We hold the 2005 amendment to §43(A) adding the six-month statutory limitations period is unconstitutional. 2010 OK 75 at ¶7. ¶2 In the present matter, the Court of Civil Appeals found this statute constitutional. We must therefore vacate their finding and sustain the order of the Workers' Compensation Court which found this statute unconstitutional. CERTIORARI PREVIOUSLY GRANTED; OPINION OF THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS VACATED; WORKERS' COMPENSATION COURT ORDER SUSTAINED. ¶3 CONCUR: EDMONDSON, C.J., HARGRAVE, KAUGER, WATT, COLBERT, REIF, JJ. ¶4 DISSENT: TAYLOR, V.C.J., WINCHESTER, J.