Title: WADE v. HOPE & KILLINGSWORTH
Citation: 186 P. 23 5, 1919 OK 300, 77 Okla. 62
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: October 21, 1919

WADE v. HOPE & KILLINGSWORTH Annotate this Case WADE v. HOPE & KILLINGSWORTH 1919 OK 300 186 P. 235 77 Okla. 62 Case Number: 10868 Decided: 10/21/1919 Supreme Court of Oklahoma WADE v. HOPE & KILLINGSWORTH. Syllabus ¶0 1. New Trial--Ruling on Motion--Reconsideration--Time for New Trial A motion to vacate an order overruling motion for new trial can serve no purpose but to take the place of an application or petition for new trial, and does not have the effect of extending the time within which the trial court may reconsider its order denying motion for new trial beyond the term at which the same was made, or to extend the time in which a petition for new trial, after the term, may be filed. 2. Same--Motion for New Trial--Time for Filing. Under section 5035, Rev. Laws 1910, application for new trial must be made at the term the judgment was rendered, except in the instances mentioned in said section, and a petition for new trial, after the term, under the provisions of section 5037, Rev. Laws 1910, must be filed within one year after the final judgment was rendered. Error from District Court, Jefferson County, Will Linn, Judge. Motion by C. S. Wade to vacate order overruling motion for new trial. From a judgment in favor of Hope & Killingsworth, adverse, parties striking motion from the files and denying the relief prayed, Wade brings error. Appeal dismissed as frivolous. H. P. Lockett, for plaintiff in error. Bridges & Vertrees and A. W. Reynolds, for defendants in error. OWEN, C. J. ¶1 From a judgment in favor of Hope & Killingsworth, entered October 15, 1915, Wade prosecuted error to this court, and his appeal was dismissed ( ¶2 A motion to vacate an order overruling but to take the place of an application or petition for new trial, and does not have the effect of extending the time in which the trial court may reconsider its order denying a motion for new trial beyond the term at which the same was made, as provided by section 5035, Rev. Laws 1910, or to extend the time in which a petition for new trial may be filed under the provisions of section 5037, of this statute, which requires same to be filed within one year from the date of the final judgment. Owen v. Dist. Ct. of Okla. Co., ¶3 The appeal, therefore, is dismissed.