Title: State v. Parizek
Citation: 2003 ND 192, 674 N.W.2d 21
Docket Number: 
State: north-dakota
Issuer: north-dakota Supreme Court
Date: December 19, 2003

State v. Parizek Annotate this Case Filed Dec. 19, 2003 IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2003 ND 192 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Steve Parizek, Defendant and Appellant No. 20030125 Appeal from the District Court of McKenzie County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable David W. Nelson, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Ross L. Sundeen, Assistant State's Attorney, 109 Fifth Street SW, P.O. Box 1260, Watford City, N.D. 58854-1260, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Steve Parizek, pro se, 2521 Circle Drive, Jamestown, N.D. 58401, defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. Parizek No. 20030125 Per Curiam. [¶1] Steve Parizek appeals from a Northwest Judicial District Court judgment convicting him of possession of drug paraphernalia in violation of N.D.C.C. §§19-03.4-03 and 19.1-03.1-07(5). Parizek argues the district court failed to give him a complete transcript to prepare his appeal. He also argues that the district court did not properly question him to determine whether his guilty plea was voluntary and that he had ineffective assistance of counsel. The judgment of conviction is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). We summarily affirm without prejudice to Parizek's right to raise the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel in post-conviction proceedings. See State v. Palmer, 2002 ND 5, ¶13, 638 N.W.2d 18 . [¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Dale V. Sandstrom Carol Ronning Kapsner Mary Muehlen Maring William A. Neumann