Title: BANK OF TAFT v. THOMPSON
Citation: 119 P. 12 4, 1911 OK 355, 29 Okla. 683
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: November 14, 1911

BANK OF TAFT v. THOMPSON Annotate this Case BANK OF TAFT v. THOMPSON 1911 OK 355 119 P. 124 29 Okla. 683 Case Number: 1478 Decided: 11/14/1911 Supreme Court of Oklahoma BANK OF TAFT v. THOMPSON et al. Syllabus by the Court. ¶0 Dismissed for failure to file briefs within the time limited by rule 7 of the Supreme Court (95 Pac. vi). Error from District Court, Muskogee County; John H. King, Judge. Action between the Bank of Taft and William Thompson and Walter Dills. From the judgment, the Bank of Taft brings error. Dismissed. Carl Pursel, for plaintiff in error. Benj. Martin, Jr., for defendants in error. KANE, J. ¶1 This cause comes on to be heard upon motion of the defendants in error to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that the plaintiff in error has failed to observe rule 7 of this court (95 Pac. vi) in not filing briefs within the required time. An examination of the record shows that the plaintiff in error is in default in regard to filing briefs, although the time for doing so has expired. ¶2 The motion to dismiss must be sustained. All the Justices concur, except WILLIAMS, J., absent.