Title: City of Philadelphia v. The Philadelphia Parking Authority, et al. (Per Curiam Order)
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 28 EAP 2001, 28EAP2001
State: Pennsylvania
Issuer: Pennsylvania Supreme Court
Date: May 31, 2002

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, APPELLANT, v. THE PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY, JOSEPH T. ASHDALE, MICHAEL A. CIBIK, CATHERINE MARSHALL, ALFRED W. TAUBENBERGER, RUSSELL R. WAGNER, KAREN M. WRIGLEY, APPELLEES. : : : : : : : : : : No. 28 EAP 2001 Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court, dated July 20, 2001, at No. 343 M.D. 2001; Petition for Contempt SUBMITTED: September 5, 2001 ORDER PER CURIAM: AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2002, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for disposition on the merits. In light of our disposition of the jurisdictional issue, we hereby lift the stay of further implementation of Act 22. Appellant’s Petition for Contempt is DENIED as moot. Mr. Justice Castille files a Concurring Statement which is joined by Mr. Justice Nigro. Mr. Justice Saylor files a Concurring Statement. Mr. Chief Justice Zappala files a Dissenting Statement which is joined by Mr. Justice Cappy.