Title: HUKILL v. THARP
Citation: 128 P. 11 3, 1912 OK 728, 36 Okla. 178
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: November 19, 1912

HUKILL v. THARP Annotate this Case HUKILL v. THARP 1912 OK 728 128 P. 113 36 Okla. 178 Case Number: 2247 Decided: 11/19/1912 Supreme Court of Oklahoma HUKILL et al. v. THARP et al. Syllabus ¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR -- Dismissal -- Failure to File Briefs. Where plaintiffs in error file no brief, as required by rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi) of this court, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Dick Rice, for plaintiffs in error. F. D. Fulkerson, for defendants in error. SHARP, C. ¶1 The petition in error and case made was filed in this court January 9, 1911. Plaintiffs in error have filed no brief; nor have they asked for an extension of time in which to prepare and file brief. It will therefore be considered that the appeal has been abandoned; and the petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296 , 119 P. 205; Rice et al. v. Jones et al., 32 Okla. 734 , 124 P. 67; Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Rath, 32 Okla. 857 , 124 P. 59. ¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.