Title: INDUSTRIAL BLDG. & LOAN ASS'N v. CUNNINGHAM
Citation: 183 Okla. 125, 1938 OK 359, 80 P.2d 228
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: May 24, 1938

INDUSTRIAL BLDG. & LOAN ASS'N v. CUNNINGHAM Annotate this Case INDUSTRIAL BLDG. & LOAN ASS'N v. CUNNINGHAM 1938 OK 359 80 P.2d 228 183 Okla. 125 Case Number: 28512 Decided: 05/24/1938 Supreme Court of Oklahoma INDUSTRIAL BUILDING & LOAN ASS'N v. CUNNINGHAM et al Syllabus ¶0 1. APPEAL AND ERROR--Appeal by Transcript--Motion for New Trial and Order not Part of Record. A motion for new trial and an order mode thereon are no part of the record of the trial court which can be brought to this court by transcript unless incorporated therein by bill of exceptions. Appeal from District Court, Tulsa County; Harry L. S. Halley, Judge. Action by the Industrial Building & Loan Association against Willard Cunningham et al. to foreclose a mortgage. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Dismissed. O. G. Rollins, for plaintiff in error. Silverman, Rosenstein & Rinehart, for defendants in error. PER CURIAM. ¶1 This is an appeal by transcript. The appeal is from the order sustaining the motion for a new trial. A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the order sustaining the motion for new trial is not a part of the record. The appeal must be dismissed. This court has many times held that motions and rulings thereon are no part of the record and cannot be presented to this court by transcript. Chase v. Byrnes, 147 Okla. 118 , 294 P. 786; Adams Royalty Co. v. Faulkner, 176 Okla. 423 , 55 P.2d 1033; Mitchell v. Peerson, 179 Okla. 521 , 66 P.2d 1 . ¶2 The appeal is dismissed.