Title: In re Shriver
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 107697
State: Kansas
Issuer: Kansas Supreme Court
Date: January 18, 2013

1 
 
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS 
 
No. 107,697 
 
In the Matter of DAVID G. SHRIVER, 
Respondent.  
 
 
ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT 
 
 
On June 22, 2012, this court suspended the respondent, David G. Shriver, from the 
practice of law in Kansas for a period of 6 months. See In re David G. Shriver, 294 Kan. 
617, 278 P.3d 964 (2012). Before reinstatement, the respondent was required to pay the 
costs of the disciplinary action and comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2012 Kan. Ct. 
R. Annot. 397) and Supreme Court Rule 219 (2012 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 398).   
 
 
On January 8, 2013, David G. Shriver filed a petition with this court for 
reinstatement to the practice of law in Kansas. The petition was referred to the 
Disciplinary Administrator for consideration by the Kansas Board for Discipline of 
Attorneys, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 219. The Disciplinary Administrator affirmed 
that the respondent met all requirements set forth by the court. 
 
 
The court, after carefully considering the record, grants the respondent's petition 
for reinstatement.   
 
 
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the respondent be reinstated to the practice 
of law in the state of Kansas conditioned upon his compliance with the annual continuing 
legal education requirements and upon his payment of all fees required by the Clerk of 
the Appellate Courts and the Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission. When the 
respondent has complied with the annual continuing legal education requirements and has 
paid the fees required by the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and the Kansas Continuing 
2 
 
Legal Education Commission, the Clerk is directed to enter respondent's name upon the 
roster of attorneys engaged in the practice of law in Kansas.  
 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order of reinstatement of David G. Shriver 
shall be published in the Kansas Reports, and the costs of the reinstatement proceedings 
are assessed to the respondent. 
 
 
Dated this 18th day of January, 2013.