Title: Bocci v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: S46461
State: Oregon
Issuer: Oregon Supreme Court
Date: April 19, 2001

Filed:  April 19, 2001
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

PAUL R. BOCCI, JR.,guardian ad litem forPAUL R. BOCCI, III,an incapacitated individual,
	Plaintiff,
		v.
KEY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,a foreign corporation,SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION,a foreign corporation,and SCHERING CORPORATION,a foreign corporation,
	Defendants,
		and
MILES, INC.,an Indiana corporation,MILES, INC., PHARMACEUTICAL DIVISION,an Indiana corporation,LEGACY HEALTH SYSTEM,an Oregon corporation, LEGACY IMMEDIATE CARE CLINIC,FREDERICK D. EDWARDS, M.D.,
and THE EUGENE CLINIC,a partnership,
	Defendants.
_________________________________________________________________
FREDERICK D. EDWARDS, M.D.,
	Respondent on Review,
		v.
KEY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
a foreign corporation,
SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION,
a foreign corporation,
and SCHERING CORPORATION,
a foreign corporation,
	Petitioners on Review.
(CC A9210-07050; CA A86556; SC S46461)

	On petition for review filed May 18, 1999.*
	William F. Gary, Stanton F. Long, Sharon A. Rudnick, James
E. Mountain, Jr., and Judith Giers, of Harrang Long Gary Rudnick
P.C, Eugene, filed the petition for petitioners on review.
	Margaret A. Sundberg and Mary H. Spillane, of Williams,
Kastner &amp; Gobbs PLLC, Seattle, Washington, filed the response for
respondent on review.  With them on the response were Daniel M.
Holland and Ronald B. Terzenbach, of Loomis &amp; Holland, Eugene.
	Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Durham,
Kulongoski, Leeson, and De Muniz, Justices.**
	MEMORANDUM OPINION
	The petition for review is allowed.  The decision of the
Court of Appeals is vacated.  The case is remanded to the Court
of Appeals for further consideration in light of Parrott v. Carr
Chevrolet, Inc., 331 Or 537, ___ P3d ___ (2001).
* 	Appeal from Multnomah County Circuit Court, William C. Snouffer, Judge. 158 Or App 521, 974 P2d 758 (1999).
** 	Riggs, J., did not participate in the consideration or
decision of this case.