Title: Kaopua v. Kollar
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: SCPW-18-0000889
State: Hawaii
Issuer: Hawaii Supreme Court
Date: November 21, 2018

SCPW-18-0000889 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I HERMAN-LEE KAOPUA, SR., Petitioner, vs. JUSTIN F. KOLLAR, in his capacity as Prosecuting Attorney, County of Kaua#i; and STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondents. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (S.P.P. NO. 18-1-0001) ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) Upon consideration of petitioner Herman-Lee Kaopua, Sr.’s petition for writ of mandamus, filed on November 14, 2018, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate that he is entitled to the requested extraordinary writ. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action); Barnett v. Broderick, 84 Hawai#i 109, 111, 929 P.2d 1359, 1361 (1996) (with respect to a public official, mandamus relief is available to Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-18-0000889 21-NOV-2018 11:51 AM compel an official to perform a duty allegedly owed to an individual only if the individual’s claim is clear and certain, the official’s duty is ministerial and so plainly prescribed as to be free from doubt, and no other remedy is available). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 21, 2018. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson 2