Title: Braxton v. State
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 22, 2016
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: March 1, 2016

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, 
TORY E. BRAXTON, 
 
Defendant Below- 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
STATE OF DELAWARE, 
 
Plaintiff Below- 
Appellee. 
§ 
§  No. 22, 2016 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below—Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware 
§   
§  Cr. ID 0910000699 
§ 
§ 
 
Submitted:  January 19, 2016 
Decided:   March 1, 2016 
 
Before STRINE, Chief Justice; HOLLAND, and SEITZ, Justices. 
 
O R D E R 
 
On this 1st day of March 2016, the Court having considered this matter on 
the opening brief and the motion to affirm has determined that the Superior Court 
order denying several motions seeking correction of the defendant’s sentence 
should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior 
Court in its well-reasoned December 21, 2015 Letter Order.  To the extent that 
Braxton argues that the trial judge based the sentence he imposed on improper 
factors, that argument is not properly supported by the record, is not rationally 
supported by any argument of improper bias on the part of the trial judge, is 
untimely, and is belied by the rational reasons given by the trial judge for the 
sentence imposed. 
 
2 
NOW, THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 
Court is AFFIRMED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chief Justice