Title: Nevins v. Bryan, et al.
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 251, 2005
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: October 6, 2005

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
RAPHAEL F. NEVINS, 
 
Plaintiff Below- 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
GEORGE BRYAN, DEANWHITLA, 
WILLIAM SCHULER, CAROLYN 
TINKER, VICKI IRVING, and THE 
CENTERFORTHEADVANCEMENT 
OF DISTANCE EDUCATION IN  
RURAL AMERICA, a corporation, 
 
Defendants Below- 
Appellees. 
§ 
§  No. 251, 2005 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below-Court of Chancery 
§  of the State of Delaware 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§  C.A. No. 19975 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: August 10, 2005 
 
 
 
 
   Decided: October 6, 2005 
 
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, BERGER and RIDGELY, Justices 
 
 
 
 
 
 
O R D E R  
 
 
This 6th day of October 2005, the Court has considered the appellee’s 
motion to affirm pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 25(a) and finds it manifest 
on the face of the appellant’s opening brief that the appeal is without merit 
for the reasons stated by the Court of Chancery in its well-reasoned decision 
dated May 4, 2005, and revised May 17, 2005.  We find no error or abuse of 
discretion on the part of the Court of Chancery. 
 
2
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the appellee’s motion to 
affirm is GRANTED.  The judgment of the Court of Chancery is 
AFFIRMED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     /s/ Henry duPont Ridgely     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice