Title: State v. Marsette
Citation: 2012 ND 22
Docket Number: 
State: north-dakota
Issuer: north-dakota Supreme Court
Date: February 17, 2012

State v. Marsette Annotate this Case Court Description: Conviction of driving under the influence is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2012 ND 22 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Raunlyn Scott Marsette, Defendant and Appellant No. 20110285 Appeal from the District Court of McLean County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Ladd R. Erickson, State's Attorney, P.O. Box 1108, Washburn, ND 58577-1108, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Kent M. Morrow, 411 North 4th Street, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, ND 58502-2155, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. MarsetteNo. 20110285 Per Curiam. [¶1] Raunlyn Marsette appeals from a district court judgment entered after he conditionally pled guilty to driving under the influence. On appeal, Marsette argues the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because the arresting officer did not have reasonable and articulable suspicion for the stop of Marsette's vehicle. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Carol Ronning Kapsner Dale V. Sandstrom Daniel J. Crothers Mary Muehlen Maring