Title: Schadt, et al. v. Latchford
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 215, 2001
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: June 18, 2001

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
FRANK L. SCHADT, III and
MARGARET SCHADT,
Defendants Below-
Appellants,
v.
JANE E. LATCHFORD,
Plaintiff Below-
Appellee.
§
§
§  No. 215, 2001
§
§  Court Below—Superior Court
§  of the State of Delaware,
§  in and for New Castle County
§  C.A. No. 98C-02-170
§
§
§
§
Submitted: June 13, 2001
  Decided:
June 18, 2001
Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, WALSH, and HOLLAND, Justices.
O R D E R
This 18th day of June 2001, it appears to the Court that:
(1)
The defendants below, Frank and Margaret Schadt, have petitioned this
Court, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 42, to appeal from interlocutory orders
entered by the Superior Court on April 11, 2001 and April 23, 2001. The April 11th
decision denied the Schadts’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of
strict liability. The April 23rd decision denied the Schadts’ motion for summary
judgment on the issue of the constitutionality of Section 42-42 of Title 1 of the
Wilmington City Code.
(2)
On May 31, 2001, the Superior Court granted the Schadts’ application
-2-
to certify an interlocutory appeal on the issue of strict liability but denied their
application to certify an interlocutory appeal on the issue of the constitutionality of
Section 42-42.
(3)
Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound
discretion of this Court and are granted only in extraordinary cases.
(4)
In the exercise of its discretion, this Court has concluded that the
application for interlocutory review does not meet the requirements of Supreme
Court Rule 42(b) and should be refused.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the within
interlocutory appeal is REFUSED.  
BY THE COURT:
    s/Joseph T. Walsh
Justice