Title: State of Florida v. Era Gregersen
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: SC93-801
State: Florida
Issuer: Florida Supreme Court
Date: April 27, 2000

Supreme Court of Florida
 
____________
No. SC93801
____________
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Petitioner,
vs.
ERA GREGERSEN,
Respondent.
[April 27, 2000]
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Gregersen v. State, 714 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA
1998), which certified conflict with the decision in Peart v. State, 705 So. 2d 1059
(Fla. 3d DCA 1998).  We have jurisdiction.  See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.  
This Court recently held in Peart v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S271 (Fla. Apr.
13, 2000), that a petition for writ of error coram nobis was the proper vehicle for
-2-
raising a claim that a noncustodial defendant was not advised of the immigration
consequences of a plea.  We emphasize that all such claims filed subsequent to our
decision in Wood v. State, 750 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 1999), must be filed pursuant to a
motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.  See Peart, 25 Fla. L.
Weekly at S273.  Gregersen is approved as being consistent with our decision in
Peart.
It is so ordered.
SHAW, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
HARDING, C.J., and WELLS and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND IF
FILED, DETERMINED.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Certified
Direct Conflict of Decisions
 Fourth District - Case No.  4D97-1373 
( Palm Beach County)
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Celia Terenzio, Bureau Chief, and Sarah B.
Mayer, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, Florida,
for Petitioner
Neal R. Lewis, Miami, Florida,
for Respondent