Title: John Ellsworth v. Polk County Board Of County Commissioners
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: SC00-190
State: Florida
Issuer: Florida Supreme Court
Date: February 22, 2001

Supreme Court of Florida
 
____________
No. SC00-190
____________
JOHN ELLSWORTH,
Petitioner,
vs.
POLK COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,
Respondent.
[February 22, 2001]
QUINCE, J.
We have for review a decision of the Second District Court of Appeal that
cited as controlling authority Joshua v. City of Gainesville, 734 So. 2d 1068 (Fla.
1st DCA 1999), quashed, 768 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 2000), which was then pending
review in this Court.  See Ellsworth v. Polk County Board of County
Commissioners, 751 So. 2d 87 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).    We have jurisdiction.  See
art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 1981).  Based on
our recent decision in Joshua v. City of Gainesville, 768 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 2000), we
1  Section 760.11(8), Florida Statutes (1995), provides in pertinent part: “In the event that the
commission fails to conciliate or determine whether there is reasonable cause on any complaint under this
section within 180 days of the filing of the complaint, an aggrieved person may proceed under subsection
(4), as if the commission determined that there was reasonable cause.”  Section 760.11(4), Florida Statutes
(1995), explains steps that claimants may take if the Commission has determined there is reasonable cause
to believe that discriminatory action has occurred.  
2   See § 760.10(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995).
-2-
quash the decision of the district court.
John Ellsworth (Ellsworth) filed charges of discrimination against the Polk
County Board of County Commissioners (the Board) with the Florida Commission
on Human Relations (the Commission) on February 11, 1997.  The Commission
failed to make a reasonable cause determination within the 180-day period
embodied in section 760.11(8).1  On November 19, 1998, Ellsworth filed his initial
complaint in the Circuit Court of the Tenth Judicial Circuit alleging the Board
violated the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 by failing to hire and promote him to
several positions for which he was qualified because of his age.2  Ellsworth later
filed an amended complaint relating back to his original complaint on January 25,
1999.
The Board filed a motion to dismiss, alleging Ellsworth’s action was barred
by the one-year statute of limitations set forth in section 760.11(5), Florida Statutes
3  Section 760.11(5), Florida Statutes (1995), provides in pertinent part: “A civil action brought
under this section shall be commenced no later than 1 year after the date of determination of reasonable
cause by the commission.”
-3-
(1995).3  The Board claimed that the one-year statute of limitations began to run at
the end of the 180-day period when the Commission failed to make a reasonable
cause determination.  The trial court agreed and granted the motion to dismiss with
prejudice.  The Second District affirmed the trial court’s dismissal, citing Joshua v.
City of Gainesville, 734 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), as controlling authority.
In Joshua, the First District Court of Appeal held the one-year statute of
limitations applies when the Commission fails to make a reasonable cause
determination within 180 days.  See id. at 1071.  However, the First District
certified the following as a question of great public importance:
DOES THE SECTION 760.11(5), FLORIDA
STATUTES (1995), ONE-YEAR STATUTE OF
LIMITATIONS FOR FILING CIVIL ACTIONS
“AFTER THE DATE OF DETERMINATION OF
REASONABLE CAUSE BY THE COMMISSION”
APPLY ALSO UPON THE COMMISSION’S
FAILURE TO MAKE ANY DETERMINATION AS TO
“REASONABLE CAUSE” WITHIN 180 DAYS AS
CONTEMPLATED IN SECTION 760.11(8), FLORIDA
STATUTES (1995), SO THAT AN ACTION FILED
BEYOND THE ONE-YEAR PERIOD IS TIME
BARRED?
We recently answered this question in the negative and held that the general
-4-
four-year statute of limitations for statutory causes of action embodied in section
95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1999), applies when the Commission fails to make a
reasonable cause determination within 180 days.  See Joshua v. City of Gainesville,
768 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 2000).  Because the Second District’s decision in Ellsworth
relied upon the decision of the First District in Joshua, we quash the decision below
and remand for further proceedings not inconsistent with this decision.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE and LEWIS, JJ.,
concur.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND
IF FILED, DETERMINED.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - 
Direct Conflict
Second District - Case No. 2D99-00828 
(Polk County)
Merette L. Oweis of Dicesare, Davidson & Barker, P.A., Lakeland, Florida,
for Petitioner
Brendan Lee and Denise Wheeler of MacFarlane, Ferguson & McMullen, Tampa,
Florida,
for Respondent