Title: PILLSBURY FLOUR MILLS CO. v. MCNEILL
Citation: 185 Okla. 574, 1939 OK 437, 95 P.2d 235
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: October 24, 1939

PILLSBURY FLOUR MILLS CO. v. MCNEILL Annotate this Case PILLSBURY FLOUR MILLS CO. v. MCNEILL 1939 OK 437 95 P.2d 235 185 Okla. 574 Case Number: 29014 Decided: 10/24/1939 Supreme Court of Oklahoma PILLSBURY FLOUR MILLS CO. et al. v. McNEILL et al. Syllabus ¶0 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION--Review of Awards by Court--Disposition of Cause Upon Confession of Error by Claimant. In a proceeding to review an award of the State Industrial Commission, when the claimant, respondent, files a confession of error and the record and the authorities reasonably support said confession of error, this court may in its discretion remand the cause to the State Industrial Commission with instructions to vacate the award in accordance with said confession of error. Original proceeding in the Supreme Court by the Pillsbury Flour Mills Company et al. to review an award of the State Industrial Commission in favor of George Riley MeNeill. Award vacated, with directions. Crouch, Rhodes & Crowe, of Oklahoma City, for petitioners. L. E. Roseboom, of Enid, and Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for respondent. PER CURIAM. ¶1 By this proceeding the petitioner Pillsbury Flour Mills Company, employer, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, insurance carrier, seek to review an award of the State Industrial Commission entered November 18, 1938, in favor of George Riley McNeill, respondent, who was claimant in the State Industrial Commission, which award found that respondent was totally temporarily disabled by reason of an accidental injury and ordered payment accordingly. ¶2 One of the specifications of error in the petition for review is that the evidence is not sufficient to support the award. On March 28, 1939, respondent filed a confession of error in which it is admitted that the evidence in the record now before us might be insufficient. He suggests that the cause be remanded to the State Industrial Commission for further proceedings, but such proceeding is not authorized for such purpose. ¶3 Under the authority of Harbour-Longmire Co. v. Owrey, 167 Okla. 417, 30 P.2d 163 , upon the filing of such confession of error, the award may be vacated. ¶4 The award is vacated.