Title: Proctor v. Foraker
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 429, 2005
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: October 13, 2005

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
RONALD E. PROCTOR, JR., 
Respondent Below, 
Appellant, 
v. 
HELEN FORAKER, STATE OF 
DELAWARE, DEPARTMENT OF 
CORRECTIONS, ET AL., 
Petitioners Below, 
Appellees. 
§ 
§  No. 429, 2005 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below—Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware, 
§  in and for Family County 
§  File Nos. CK94-3895 
§    
§ 
 
O R D E R 
 
This 13th day of October 2005, it appears to the Court that, on September 21, 
2005, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be 
dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant's failure to 
comply with Rule 42 when taking an appeal from an apparent interlocutory order 
in this matter.  The appellant failed to respond to the notice to show cause within 
the required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be 
unopposed. 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme 
Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED. 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
/s/ Myron T. Steele 
Chief Justice