Title: YOCUM v. SIKKINK
Citation: 1952 OK 107, 206Okla180, 242 P.2d 164
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: March 18, 1952

YOCUM v. SIKKINK Annotate this Case YOCUM v. SIKKINK 1952 OK 107 242 P.2d 164 206 Okla 180 Case Number: 34575 Decided: 03/18/1952 Supreme Court of Oklahoma Syllabus ¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR - Where motion for new trial not filed within statutory time, appeal dismissed. Where motion for new trial is not filed within three days from the date of the verdict of the jury, and no showing is made that the motion was unavoidably prevented from being filed within the time, the appeal will be dismissed. Appeal from Court of Common Pleas, Tulsa County; Stanley C. Edmister, Judge. Action by Mr. and Mrs. Dean Sikkink against H.L. Yocum et al. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal. Dismissed. Bradford, March & Trippet, Tulsa, for plaintiffs in error. Grady S. Cornett, Tulsa, for defendants in error. PER CURIAM. ¶1 This appeal comes from the court of common pleas of Tulsa county, Oklahoma, Division three. The case was tried to the court and jury November 1, 1949, and the jury returned verdict same day, $200, for the plaintiffs. Defendants filed motion for new trial November 5, 1949, and same was overruled December 5, 1949, to which defendants excepted and have appealed to this court. ¶2 It will be observed that the motion for new trial was one day late and there being no showing that plaintiffs in error were unavoidably prevented from filing their motion for new trial within the time provided by 12 O.S. 1951 § 653, the right of appeal was lost. Ramsey Oil Co. v. Dunbar, 171 Okla. 124 , 42 P.2d 128 ; Joiner v. Goldsmith, 25 Okla. 840 , 107 P. 733; Gibson v. Farmers' & Merchants' Bank of Boley, 108 Okla. 268, 236 P. 420. For other cases see 12 O.S. 1951 § 653, note 1. ¶3 Appeal dismissed. ¶4 Execution of supersedeas bond herein having been called to the court's attention, judgment accordingly is rendered thereon in favor of defendants in error. ¶5 This court acknowledges the services of Attorneys Charles G. Watts, R.A. Wilkerson, and Fred W. Martin, who as Special Masters aided in the preparation of this opinion. These attorneys were recommended by the Oklahoma Bar Association, approved by the Judicial Council, and appointed by the court. ¶6 HALLEY, V.C.J., and CORN, GIBSON, DAVISON, JOHNSON, O'NEAL, and BINGAMAN, JJ., concur.