Title: LARGE v. LARGE
Citation: 1923 OK 790, 219 P. 29 2, 95 Okla. 284
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: October 16, 1923

LARGE v. LARGE Annotate this Case LARGE v. LARGE 1923 OK 790 219 P. 292 95 Okla. 284 Case Number: 12541 Decided: 10/16/1923 Supreme Court of Oklahoma LARGE v. LARGE. Syllabus ¶0 1. Divorce -- Appeal -- Sufficiency of Evidence. In an appeal from a judgment of the trial court granting a decree of divorce, where the only question presented challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment, this court will examine the evidence, and if the same is found sufficient to sustain the judgment of the trial court, the judgment will be affirmed. 2. Same--Affirmance. Record examined, and held, that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the judgment of the trial court and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed. T. S. Hurst, for plaintiff in error. McCollum & McCollum, for defendant in error. KENNAMER, J. ¶1 Grace M. Large, plaintiff, instituted this action in the district court of Pawnee county against A. C. Large, defendant, to obtain a decree of divorce upon the ground of extreme cruelty. The trial court, upon the evidence introduced in the trial of the cause, granted the plaintiff a decree of divorce. Defendant, A. C. Large, prosecutes this appeal to reverse the judgment of the trial court. ¶2 The only question raised in the appeal presents the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment of the trial court. We have carefully examined the evidence, and it is our conclusion that the judgment entered is supported by sufficient evidence. It therefore necessarily follows that the judgment must be affirmed, and it is so ordered.