Title: Griffin v. State
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: SC17-1306
State: Florida
Issuer: Florida Supreme Court
Date: February 2, 2018

Supreme Court of Florida 
 
 
____________ 
 
No. SC17-1306 
____________ 
 
MICHAEL ALLEN GRIFFIN  
Appellant, 
 
vs. 
 
STATE OF FLORIDA  
Appellee. 
 
[February 2, 2018] 
 
 
 
 
PER CURIAM. 
We have for review Michael Allen Griffin’s appeal of the circuit court’s 
order denying Griffin’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal 
Procedure 3.851.  This Court has jurisdiction.  See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.   
Griffin’s motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s 
decision in Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and our decision on remand in 
Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 2161 
(2017).  This Court stayed Griffin’s appeal pending the disposition of Hitchcock v. 
State, 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017).  After this 
 
 
- 2 - 
Court decided Hitchcock, Griffin responded to this Court’s order to show cause 
arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case. 
After reviewing Griffin’s response to the order to show cause, as well as the 
State’s arguments in reply, we conclude that Griffin is not entitled to relief.  Griffin 
was sentenced to death following a jury’s recommendation for death by a vote of 
ten to two.  Griffin v. State, 639 So. 2d 966, 968 (Fla. 1994).  Griffin’s sentence of 
death became final in 1995.  Griffin v. Florida, 514 U.S. 1005 (1995).  Thus, Hurst 
does not apply retroactively to Griffin’s sentence of death.  See Hitchcock, 226 So. 
3d at 217.  Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Griffin’s motion. 
The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Griffin, we 
caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken.  It is so 
ordered. 
LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur. 
PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion. 
LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result. 
PARIENTE, J., concurring in result. 
I concur in result because I recognize that this Court’s opinion in Hitchcock 
v. State, 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017), is now 
final.  However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting 
opinion in Hitchcock. 
An Appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Dade County,  
Diane Valentina Ward, Judge - Case No. 131990CF016875C000XX 
 
 
- 3 - 
 
Martin J. McClain of McClain & McDermott, P.A., Wilton Manors, Florida,  
 
 
for Appellant 
 
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Melissa J. Roca, 
Assistant Attorney General, Miami, Florida,  
 
 
for Appellee