Title: Runge v. Runge
Citation: 2001 ND 39, 625 N.W.2d 264
Docket Number: 
State: north-dakota
Issuer: north-dakota Supreme Court
Date: February 20, 2001

Runge v. Runge Annotate this Case Runge v. Runge, 2001 ND 39, 625 N.W.2d 264 [Go to Documents]Filed Feb. 20, 2001[Download as WordPerfect]IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA2001 ND 39 Gregory Ian Runge, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Karen Kathleen Runge, Defendant and Appellee No. 20000121 Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Ronald L. Hilden, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Edwin W. F. Dyer (argued), Dyer & Summers, P.C., P.O. Box 2261, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2261, for plaintiff and appellant. Gregory Ian Runge, 418 E. Rosser Ave., Suite A, Bismarck, N.D. 58501. Monte L. Rogneby, Vogel Law Firm, P.O. Box 2097, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2097, for defendant and appellee. Runge v. Runge No. 20000121 Per Curiam. [¶1] Gregory Ian Runge appealed the district court's judgment determining the valuation and division of marital property. Gregory Runge claims the trial court erred by not explaining the distribution and by dividing the couple's property inequitably. We conclude the trial court's distribution of the couple's marital estate is not clearly erroneous. We therefore affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Dale V. Sandstrom William A. Neumann Mary Muehlen Maring Gordon O. Hoberg, S.J. [¶3] Gordon O. Hoberg, S.J., sitting in place of Kapsner, J., disqualified.