Title: HUNTER v. HUGHES
Citation: 186 P. 46 8, 1920 OK 3, 77 Okla. 81
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: January 6, 1920

HUNTER v. HUGHES Annotate this Case HUNTER v. HUGHES 1920 OK 3 186 P. 468 77 Okla. 81 Case Number: 10508 Decided: 01/06/1920 Supreme Court of Oklahoma HUNTER v. HUGHES et al. Syllabus ¶0 Appeal and Error--Notice of Appeal--Statute. Section 5238, Rev. Laws Okla. 1910, as amended by Act March 23, 1917 (Laws 1917, c. 219, section 1), is mandatory, and, among other things, provides that: "The party desiring to appeal shall give notice in open court, either at the time the judgment is rendered, or within ten day thereafter, of his intentions to appeal to the Supreme Court." Error from District Court, Creek County; M. L. Bozarth, Judge. Action between Charlotte Hunter and Gordon C. Hughes and others. From the judgment, Hunter brings error. Dismissed. I. H. Spears, for plaintiff in error. Ernest B. Hughes, for defendants in error. OWEN, C. J. ¶1 On motion to dismiss it appears there was no notice given of the intention to appeal, as provided by chapter 219, Sess. L. 1917, repealing section 5238, Rev. Laws 1910. That portion of the chapter providing: "* * * and the party desiring to appeal shall give notice in open court, either at the time the judgment is rendered, or within ten days thereafter, of his intention to appeal to the Supreme Court" --was held to be mandatory in the case of Cates v. Miles, 67 Okla. 192 , 169 P. 888, and under the authority of that case the motion to dismiss must be sustained. ¶2 The motion is therefore sustained, and the appeal dismissed.