Title: Berry v. State
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 35, 2019
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: April 2, 2019

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
STEVEN BERRY, 
 
Defendant Below, 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
STATE OF DELAWARE, 
 
Plaintiff Below, 
Appellee. 
§ 
§   
§  No. 35, 2019 
§ 
§  Court Below–Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware 
§  
§  Cr. ID No. 1109007172 (K)   
§   
§ 
§ 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: March 21, 2019 
 
 
 
 
Decided: 
April 2, 2019 
 
ORDER 
 
It appears to the Court that, on February 19, 2019, the Chief Deputy Clerk 
issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed under 
Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant’s failure to diligently prosecute his 
appeal by not responding to the Clerk’s January 28, 2019, letter directing him to file 
his motion to proceed in forma pauperis with notarization by February 12, 2019.  
The appellant responded to the notice to show cause.  The Clerk informed him that 
the motion to show cause would be held in abeyance pending the receipt of his 
corrected motion to proceed in forma pauperis on or before March 21, 2019.  
Appellant failed to file his motion to proceed in forma pauperis with notarization on 
or before March 21, 2019.  Therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed unopposed.  
2 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) 
and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED. 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice