Title: Jasmann v. State
Citation: 2017 ND 150
Docket Number: 
State: north-dakota
Issuer: north-dakota Supreme Court
Date: June 29, 2017

Jasmann v. State Annotate this Case Court Description: 150 A district court order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (7). IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2017 ND 150 Matthew Jasmann, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee No. 20160396 Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable John E. Greenwood, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Thomas J. Glass, Bismarck, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief. Frederick R. Fremgen, Stutsman County State's Attorney, Jamestown, ND, for respondent and appellee. Jasmann v. StateNo. 20160396 Per Curiam. [¶1] Matthew Jasmann appealed from the district court's order denying his application for post-conviction relief. In his application, Jasmann argued: (1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel, (2) the State failed to obtain evidence which was exculpatory in nature, and (3) the State's actions during trial amounted to prosecutorial misconduct. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P 35.1(a)(2), (7). State v. Steffes, 500 N.W.2d 608 , 612 (N.D. 1993) ("Police generally have no duty to collect evidence for the defense."). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Carol Ronning Kapsner