Title: Ennen v. State
Citation: 2013 ND 66
Docket Number: 
State: north-dakota
Issuer: north-dakota Supreme Court
Date: May 14, 2013

Ennen v. State Annotate this Case Court Description: An appeal from an order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2013 ND 66 John Karl Ennen, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee No. 20120408 Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Cynthia Feland, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Kent M. Morrow, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2155, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief. Jackson J. Lofgren, Assistant State's Attorney, 210 2nd Avenue NW, Mandan, N.D. 58554, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief. Ennen v. StateNo. 20120408 Per Curiam. [¶1] John Ennen appeals from an order denying his application for post-conviction relief. After an evidentiary hearing, the district court decided Ennen did not receive ineffective assistance of trial counsel in proceedings culminating with this Court's summary affirmance of his conviction for surreptitious intrusion. See State v. Ennen, 2011 ND 130, ¶ 1, 803 N.W.2d 834. We conclude the district court did not err in deciding Ennen did not receive ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and we affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Mary Muehlen Maring Daniel J. Crothers Dale V. Sandstrom Carol Ronning Kapsner