Title: Cramer v. Brady
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 232, 2009
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: December 4, 2009

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
DONALD CRAMER, 
 
Petitioner Below, 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
CAROLYN BRADY, 
 
Respondent Below, 
Appellee. 
§ 
§  No. 232, 2009 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below—Family Court 
§  of the State of Delaware, 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§  File No. CN09-01824 
§   
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: November 19, 2009 
 
 
 
 
 
   Decided: December 4, 2009 
 
O R D E R 
 
This 4th day of December 2009, it appears to the Court that, on November 
17, the Clerk sent a notice to appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be 
dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for appellant's failure to diligently 
prosecute his appeal by not filing his opening brief and appendix in this matter.  
Appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-
day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme 
Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED. 
BY THE COURT: 
 
/s/Henry duPont Ridgely 
Justice