Title: ST. LOUIS & S. F. R. CO. v. DAVIS
Citation: 134 P. 2 1, 1913 OK 409, 39 Okla. 98
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: June 11, 1913

ST. LOUIS & S. F. R. CO. v. DAVIS Annotate this Case ST. LOUIS & S. F. R. CO. v. DAVIS 1913 OK 409 134 P. 21 39 Okla. 98 Case Number: 2726 Decided: 06/11/1913 Supreme Court of Oklahoma ST. LOUIS & S. F. R. CO. v. DAVIS. Syllabus ¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Presentation for Review--Denial of New Trial. Where the petition in error does not assign as error the overruling of the motion for a new trial, no question is properly presented in this court to review errors alleged to have occurred during the progress of the trial in the court below, and the appeal will be dismissed. W. F. Evans, R. A. Kleinschmidt, and J. H. Grant, for plaintiff in error. S. A. Cordell and W. L. Johnson, for defendant in error. ROBERTSON, C. ¶1 There is a motion by defendant in error to dismiss this appeal, which must be sustained. The petition in error does not assign as error the overruling of the motion for a new trial, and, therefore, no question is properly presented in this court to review errors alleged to have occurred during the progress of the trial in the court below. Hunter v. Hines, 33 Okla. 590 , 127 P. 386; Burrus v. Funk, 29 Okla. 677 , 119 P. 976; Meyer v. James, 29 Okla. 7 , 115 P. 1016; Martin v. Gassert, 17 Okla. 177 , 87 P. 586. The appeal, therefore, should be dismissed. ¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.