Title: Rodriguez v. Gomez
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 603, 2007
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: December 21, 2007

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ,  
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
No. 603, 2007 
 
Petitioner Below,  
 
§ 
 
Appellant,  
 
 
§ 
Court Below--Family Court of 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
the State of Delaware in and  
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
§ 
for Kent County 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
YOLANDA GOMEZ, 
 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
File No. CK05-02088 
 
Respondent Below, 
 
§ 
Pet. No. 06-40574 
 
Appellee. 
 
 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: December 3, 2007 
 
 
 
 
Decided: 
December 21, 2007 
 
 
 
 
 
O R D E R 
 
This 21st day of December 2007, it appears to the Court that the Clerk’s notice 
dated November 16, 2007, directed that the appellant show cause why this appeal 
should not be dismissed as untimely filed.1  The appellant did not respond to the notice 
to show cause.2  The dismissal of the appeal is deemed to be unopposed.3 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 
3(b)(2), 6(a)(i) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Myron T. Steele 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chief Justice 
                                                 
1 The notice of appeal was filed on November 16, 2007 from a Family Court order dated July 11, 
2007.  See Supr. Ct. R. 6(a)(i) (providing that notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days); Supr. Ct. R. 
29(b) (providing for involuntary dismissal of untimely appeal). 
2 See Supr. Ct. R. 29(b) (providing that appellant must respond to notice within ten days). 
3 Id. (providing that appellant’s failure to respond to notice to show cause of dismissal is deemed to be 
consent to dismissal).  See also Supr. Ct. R. 3(b)(2) (providing for dismissal by single Justice when appellant’s 
failure to respond to notice to show cause is deemed to be consent to dismissal).