Title: State of Maine v. Kenneth G. Coffin
Citation: 2003 ME 83
Docket Number: Pis-02-768
State: Maine
Issuer: Maine Supreme Court
Date: July 3, 2003

State of Maine v. Kenneth G. Coffin Annotate this Case Download PDF MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Decision: 2003 ME 83 Docket: Pis-02-768 Submitted on Briefs: May 29, 2003 Decided: July 3, 2003 Panel: Reporter of Decisions SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, ALEXANDER, and CALKINS, JJ. STATE OF MAINE v. KENNETH G. COFFIN CALKINS, J. [¶1] The State of Maine appeals from an order entered in the District Court (Dover-Foxcroft, Stitham, J.), granting Kenneth Coffin s motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to a search warrant. The police obtained a search warrant for Coffin s residence based on the discovery of marijuana plants in the woods near the residence and a path leading in the direction of the residence. The State argues that the affidavit supporting the request for a warrant provided the basis for a probable cause determination. Finding that the warrant was supported by probable cause, we vacate the order suppressing the warrant. 2 I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE [¶2] Officer Guy Dow of the Piscataquis County Sheriff s Department received a tip that marijuana was being grown in the woods near the Medford Center Road. After investigating, Dow applied for a search warrant to search the Coffin residence and curtilage. In his affidavit accompanying the request for the warrant, Dow averred that he was in the woods behind [Coffin s] premises and intersected a beaten path coming from the direction of the premises. At the end of this path was [sic] several plots of marijuana. Some of this marijuana was approximately two feet tall. I counted a total of eight plants. Dow further stated: I estimate that I was approximately 50 yards straight behind this residence, as I heard a dog bark, and this is the only residence on this side of the road for approximately half a mile. A search warrant was issued by the District Court (Gunther, J.), authorizing a search of Coffin s premises, curtilage, vehicles, and outbuildings. [¶3] The warrant was executed the same day it was signed. The State charged Coffin with marijuana cultivation (Class D), 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1117(2)(C) (Supp. 2002) (current version at 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1117(1)(B)(3) (Supp. 2002)). Coffin pled not guilty and filed a motion to suppress evidence of marijuana cultivation obtained during the search of his premises. He argued that Dow s affidavit did not support the conclusion that there was probable cause to believe 3 that a search of the Coffin residence would uncover evidence of criminal activity. After hearing, the court granted the motion to suppress, finding that Dow s affidavit did not provide a substantial basis for a finding of probable cause. With the approval of the Attorney General, the State brought this timely appeal. II. DISCUSSION [¶4] When the State appeals from the District Court s order suppressing evidence, we review directly the probable cause finding of the judge or magistrate who issued the warrant. State v. Crowley, 1998 ME 187, ¶ 3, 714 A.2d 834, 836. We do not make the probable cause determination de novo, but rather we accord deference to the decision to issue a warrant, and we look to see whether there was a substantial basis for the finding of probable cause. Id. ¶ 4, 714 A.2d at 836. We give a positive reading to the affidavit rather than a grudging reading. Id. (quoting State v. Ward, 624 A.2d 485, 487 (Me. 1993)). [¶5] A positive reading of the affidavit here reveals that eight marijuana plants were discovered growing in the vicinity of the Coffin residence and that there was a beaten path that went from the direction of the plants toward the Coffin residence. This indicated a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime would be found on the Coffin premises, and that is all that is required for a search warrant. See Crowley, 1998 ME 187, ¶ 3, 714 A.2d at 836. 4 [¶6] Read with deference to the judge who issued the search warrant, the affidavit provides a substantial basis for a finding of probable cause. The District Court erred in suppressing the evidence discovered at the Coffin residence. The entry is: Order of suppression vacated. Remanded to the District Court for entry of an order denying the motion to suppress. Attorneys for State: R. Christopher Almy, District Attorney C. Daniel Wood, Asst. Dist. Atty. 97 Hammond Street Bangor, ME 04401 Attorney for defendant: Michael P. Harman, Esq. Law Offices of Dean A. Beaupain 4 Hill Street Millinocket, ME 04462