Title: Summit Steel, Inc. v. EDIS Company et al.
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 715, 2002
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: February 27, 2003

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
SUMMIT STEEL, INC., 
 
Third Party Defendant Below- 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
EDIS COMPANY, EDIS BUILDING 
SYSTEMS, INC., ERNEST 
DISABATINO AND SONS, INC., 
CONSTRUCTION SAFETY 
CONSULTANTS, INC., ATLAS 
LAB ASSOCIATES, ATLAS 
POINT, LLC, and CRYSTAL 
HOLDINGS, INC., 
 
Defendants/Third Party 
Plaintiffs Below- 
Appellees. 
§ 
§ 
§  No. 715, 2002 
§ 
§  Court Below—Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware, 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§  C.A. No. 01C-09-183 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
 
Submitted: January 24, 2003 
  Decided: February 27, 2003 
 
Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, WALSH, and STEELE, Justices. 
 
 
O R D E R 
 
This 27th day of February 2003, it appears to the Court that: 
(1) 
The third-party defendant below, Summit Steel, Inc., has petitioned 
this Court, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 42, to appeal from an interlocutory 
ruling of the Superior Court entered November 25, 2002.  The Superior Court=s 
ruling denied Summit’s second motion for summary judgment. 
 
 
-2- 
(2) 
On January 15, 2003, the Superior Court denied Summit=s 
application to certify an interlocutory appeal to this Court. 
(3) 
Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound 
discretion of this Court and are granted only in extraordinary cases. 
(4) 
In the exercise of its discretion, this Court has concluded that the 
application for interlocutory review does not meet the requirements of Supreme 
Court Rule 42(b) and should be refused. 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the within 
interlocutory appeal is REFUSED.   
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ E. Norman Veasey 
       
 
 
 
 
 
     Chief Justice