Title: Aker v. Neiber
Citation: 2016 ND 47
Docket Number: 
State: north-dakota
Issuer: north-dakota Supreme Court
Date: March 3, 2016

Aker v. Neiber Annotate this Case Court Description: Order denying motion to amend parenting time is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2016 ND 47 Paul W. Aker, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Diane C. Neiber, f.k.a. Diane C. Aker, Defendant and Appellee No. 20150229 Appeal from the District Court of Richland County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Bradley Allen Cruff, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Amy M. Clark, 321 Dakota Avenue, P.O. Box 38, Wahpeton, N.D. 58074-0038, and John M. Wilka, 300 North Dakota Avenue, Suite 510, Sioux Falls, S.D. 57104, for plaintiff and appellant; submitted on brief. Samuel S. Johnson, 205 Seventh Street North, P.O. Box 5, Wahpeton, N.D. 58074-0005, for defendant and appellee; submitted on brief. Aker v. NeiberNo. 20150229 Per Curiam. [¶1] Paul Aker appeals a district court order denying his motion to amend parenting time. Aker claims the ongoing conflict between the parties constitutes a material change of circumstances warranting modification, and amending parenting time is in the best interests of the children. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court did not err in finding no material change of circumstances warranting modification of parenting time. [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Dale V. Sandstrom Carol Ronning Kapsner Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers