Title: Whitton v. State
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: SC17-1118
State: Florida
Issuer: Florida Supreme Court
Date: January 31, 2018

Supreme Court of Florida 
 
 
____________ 
 
No. SC17-1118 
____________ 
 
GARY RICHARD WHITTON,  
Appellant, 
 
vs. 
 
STATE OF FLORIDA,  
Appellee. 
 
[January 31, 2018] 
 
 
 
PER CURIAM. 
We have for review Gary Richard Whitton’s appeal of the circuit court’s 
order denying Whitton’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal 
Procedure 3.851.  This Court has jurisdiction.  See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.   
Whitton’s motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme 
Court’s decision in Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and our decision on 
remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 
2161 (2017).  This Court stayed Whitton’s appeal pending the disposition of 
Hitchcock v. State, 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017).  
 
 
- 2 - 
After this Court decided Hitchcock, Whitton responded to this Court’s order to 
show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case. 
After reviewing Whitton’s response to the order to show cause, as well as 
the State’s arguments in reply, we conclude that Whitton is not entitled to relief.  
Whitton was sentenced to death following a jury’s unanimous recommendation for 
death.  Whitton v. State, 649 So. 2d 861, 864 (Fla. 1994).  Whitton’s sentence of 
death became final in 1995.  Whitton v. Florida, 516 U.S. 832 (1995).  Thus, Hurst 
does not apply retroactively to Whitton’s sentence of death.  See Hitchcock, 226 
So. 3d at 217.  Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Whitton’s motion. 
The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Whitton, we 
caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken.  It is so 
ordered. 
LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur. 
PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion. 
LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result. 
PARIENTE, J., concurring in result. 
I concur in result because I recognize that this Court’s opinion in Hitchcock 
v. State, 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017), is now 
final.  However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting 
opinion in Hitchcock. 
An Appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Walton County,  
Michael G. Allen, Judge - Case No. 661990CF000429CFAXMX 
 
 
- 3 - 
 
Mark E. Olive of Law Office of Mark Olive, P.A., Tallahassee, Florida,  
 
for Appellant 
 
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lisa A. Hopkins, Assistant Attorney 
General, Tallahassee, Florida, 
 
for Appellee