Title: P. v. Johnson
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: S029551M
State: California
Issuer: California Supreme Court
Date: February 13, 2020

Filed 2/11/20 
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  
CALIFORNIA 
 
THE PEOPLE, 
Plaintiff and Respondent, 
v. 
JOE EDWARD JOHNSON, 
Defendant and Appellant. 
 
S029551 
 
Sacramento County Superior Court 
58961 
 
 
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND  
DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING 
 
THE COURT: 
 
 
The majority opinion in this case, filed on November 25, 2019, 
and appearing at 8 Cal.5th 475, is modified as follows: 
1. 
The first sentence of the third full paragraph on page 494 
presently reads:  “At a pretrial hearing on June 12, trial counsel 
indicated that they were ready to proceed with trial as scheduled.”  
This sentence is modified to read as follows: 
 
 
 
At a discovery sanctions hearing on June 12,  
 
 
the court confirmed the scheduled June 22  
 
 
trial date, and counsel for both parties indicated  
 
 
that they anticipated proceeding with pretrial  
 
 
motions on that date. 
2 
 
 
2. 
The last sentence of the second full paragraph on page 501 
presently reads:  “Meanwhile, trial counsel advised the court on  
June 12 that they were ready to proceed with trial as scheduled.”  
This sentence is modified to read as follows: 
 
 
 
Meanwhile, trial counsel advised the court  
 
 
on June 12 that they intended to adhere to the  
 
 
existing trial schedule. 
 
 
This modification does not affect the judgment. 
 
The petition for rehearing is denied.