Title: BOARD OF COM'RS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY v. SEMINOLE GAS CO.
Citation: 109 P.2d 488, 188 Okla. 363, 1941 OK 11
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: January 21, 1941

BOARD OF COM'RS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY v. SEMINOLE GAS CO. Annotate this Case BOARD OF COM'RS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY v. SEMINOLE GAS CO. 1941 OK 11 109 P.2d 488 188 Okla. 363 Case Number: 29921 Decided: 01/21/1941 Supreme Court of Oklahoma BOARD OF COM'RS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY v. SEMINOLE GAS CO. Syllabus ¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Reversal and remand upon confession of error. Where an appeal is filed in this court, and the defendant in error upon due consideration files a confession of error which is reasonably sustained by the record, this court may reverse and remand the cause upon such confession of error, with directions. Appeal from Superior Court, Seminole County; Otis H. Presson, Judge. Action upon an account by the Seminole Gas Company against the Board of County Commissioners of Seminole County. From a judgment for the plaintiff,, defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded, with directions. John M. Stanley, County Atty., and J. M. Huser, Asst. County Atty., both of Wewoka, for plaintiff in error. J. W. Levin, of Seminole, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. ¶1 The plaintiff in error has appealed from an adverse judgment in an action upon an account for gas furnished. The defendant in error has filed a confession of error asking that the case be reversed and remanded, with directions for further proceedings in the trial court. In Odell v. Sharp, 182 Okla. 534, 78 P.2d 810, we held as follows: "Where an appeal is filed in this court and the appellee upon due consideration files a confession of error which is reasonably sustained by the record, this court may reverse and remand the cause upon such confession of error, with directions." See, also, Nelson v. Jones, 133 Okla. 92 , 271 P. 240; Deep Rock Oil Corp. v. State, 167 Okla. 324 , 29 P.2d 618 ; Kewanee Oil Co. v. State, 172 Okla. 424 , 45 P.2d 515. ¶2 We have examined the record, and the confession of error is reasonably supported by the same. The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the judgment entered for the plaintiff and to grant a new trial. ¶3 WELCH, C. J., CORN, V. C. J., and BAYLESS, HURST, and DAVISON, JJ, concur.