Title: COTTINGHAM v. COTTINGHAM
Citation: 113 Okla. 115, 1925 OK 666, 239 P. 57 4
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: September 15, 1925

COTTINGHAM v. COTTINGHAM Annotate this Case COTTINGHAM v. COTTINGHAM 1925 OK 666 239 P. 574 113 Okla. 115 Case Number: 16249 Decided: 09/15/1925 Supreme Court of Oklahoma COTTINGHAM et al. v. COTTINGHAM. Syllabus ¶0 Appeal and Error -- Case-Made -- Invalid Order Extending Time. An order granting an extension of time in which to serve case-made, made after the expiration of the time previously granted, is void and confers upon this court no jurisdiction. Error from District Court, Osage County; Jesse J. Worton, Judge. Action by Anna Lee Cottingham against Logan Cottingham and Charles B. Cottingham, as special guardian. Judgment for plaintiff, from which defendants appeal. Dismissed. John W. Tillman, Fred A. Tillman, and Welcome D. Pierson, for plaintiffs in error. Grimstead, Scott, Hamilton & Gross, for defendant in error. PER CURIAM. ¶1 This case is appealed from an order of the district court of Osage county made on the 29th day of November, 1924, denying motion of plaintiff in error to modify a former decree of the court as to the sum of money to be paid for the support of a minor child. Sixty days from the date of this order was given plaintiff in error in which to make and serve case-made. ¶2 On the 21st day of February, 1925, plaintiff in error was granted an extension of time of thirty days in which to serve case-made and defendant in error moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order of extension is void, the time having expired in which the order could be made. Under the extension granted at the time order was made November 29, 1924, the time expired in which to serve case-made on the 28th day of January, 1925, and subsequent to this time the trial court had no jurisdiction to make an order extending the time in which to make and serve case-made, and such an order of extension confers upon this court no jurisdiction to hear the appeal. Case-made was served on the 6th day of March, 1925. Montooth et al. v. Smith, 85 Okla. 43 , 203 P. 214: Brittain v. Lorett, 85 Okla. 49, 204 P. 438; Bowers v. Lawrence, 88 Okla. 31 , 210 P. 1023.