Title: Stephen J. Klarich, Jr. v. State of Florida
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: SC95-705
State: Florida
Issuer: Florida Supreme Court
Date: June 15, 2000

Supreme Court of Florida
 
____________
No. SC95705
____________
STEPHEN J. KLARICH, JR.,
Petitioner,
vs.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
[June 15, 2000]
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Klarich v. State, 730 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), a
decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal that cited as controlling authority
Maddox v. State, 708 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), approved in part,
disapproved in part, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S367 (Fla. May 11, 2000).  We have
jurisdiction.  See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So. 2d 418, 420
(Fla. 1981).  For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Maddox v. State, 25 Fla. L.
Weekly S367 (Fla. May 11, 2000), we approve the decision below and find that the
-2-
unpreserved sentencing errors in this case do not constitute fundamental error. 
It is so ordered. 
HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and
QUINCE, JJ., concur.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND IF
FILED, DETERMINED. 
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - 
Direct Conflict
Fifth District - Case No. 5D98-172 
(Volusia County)
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Susan A. Fagan, Assistant Public Defender,
Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, Florida,
for Petitioner
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Belle B. Schumann, Wesley Heidt, and
Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, Florida,
for Respondent