Title: HOWE v. HALL.
Citation: 183 P. 98 3, 1919 OK 267, 76 Okla. 41
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: September 30, 1919

HOWE v. HALL. Annotate this Case HOWE v. HALL. 1919 OK 267 183 P. 983 76 Okla. 41 Case Number: 10826 Decided: 09/30/1919 Supreme Court of Oklahoma HOWE v. HALL. Syllabus ¶0 1.Appeal and Error--Record Proper--Agreed Facts. An agreed statement of facts, not being a part of the record, unless made so by bill of exceptions or case-made, cannot be considered on error, although a copy of it is attached to the transcript of the record. 2. Same. The "record" proper in a civil action does not include an agreed statement of facts. Error from District Court, McIntosh County; H. L. Melton, Judge. R. D. Howe, for plaintiff in error. Jno. W. Porter, for defendant in error. Action by Lena Tiger Hall against Mrs. R. D. Howe to cancel deed and remove cloud from title. From the judgment, Mrs. R. D. Howe brings error by transcript. Dismissed. PER CURIAM. ¶1 This is an appeal by transcript, without bill of exceptions or case-made. A motion to dismiss the appeal was filed by defendant in error. The case was tried on an agreed statements of facts, and judgment rendered for plaintiff canceling a deed under which the defendant claimed title to the land in controversy. The assignments of error require a consideration of the agreed statement of facts on which the case was tried. It was held in the case of Brown v. Capital Townsite Co., ¶2 The "record" proper in a civil action does not include an agreed statement of facts. So. Surety Co. v. Turnham,