Title: EIKLOR et al. v. BADGER.
Citation: 108 P. 35 9, 1910 OK 65, 25 Okla. 853
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: March 8, 1910

EIKLOR et al. v. BADGER. Annotate this Case ABBOTT v. RODGERS. 1912 OK 787 128 P. 908 35 Okla. 189 Case Number: 4064 Decided: 12/03/1912 Supreme Court of Oklahoma ABBOTT v. RODGERS. Syllabus ¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Case-Made--Filing Below. The case-made attached to the petition in error, or a copy thereof, not having been filed with the papers in the case in the court below, the same is a nullity, and cannot be considered in this court, for the purpose of reviewing matters complained of in the trial court. Baker & Bloss, for plaintiff in error. Robt. E. Adams, for defendant in error. WILLIAMS, J. ¶1 Counsel for defendant in error moves to dismiss this proceeding in error for the reason that neither the case-made attached to the petition in error nor a copy thereof was filed with the papers in the case below. The said motion was filed in this court on November 13, 1912, showing service on attorneys for the plaintiff in error on the 11th day of November, 1912. No response has been made to said motion. Under the authority of St. Louis, I. M. & So. Ry. Co. v. Burrow, 33 Okla. 701 , 127 P. 478, the motion must be sustained. See, also, Marple v. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank, 28 Okla. 810 , 115 P. 1124; Oligschlager v. Grell, 13 Okla. 632 , 75 P. 1131. The motion to dismiss this proceeding in error must therefore be sustained. ¶2 All the Justices concur.