Title: Barlow, et al. v. Finegan, et al.
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 247, 2012
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: May 22, 2012

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
ANGELA M. BARLOW and JOHN 
BARLOW, JR., wife and husband, 
and ANGELA M. BARLOW, as 
Next Friend of JOHN BARLOW, III, 
a minor, and DAWN LOCKE, as 
Next Friend of KIMBERLY FOTH, 
a minor, 
 
Plaintiffs Below- 
Appellants, 
 
v. 
 
MICHAEL P. FINEGAN, DANA M. 
FINEGAN, and MICHAEL P. 
FINEGAN, JR.,  
 
           Defendants Below- 
Appellees. 
§ 
§  No. 247, 2012 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below─Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§  C.A. No. N11C-04-237 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
 
                                         Submitted: May 8, 2012 
 
 
 
 
   Decided: May 22, 2012 
 
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices 
 
 
 
 
 
 
O R D E R  
 
 
This 22nd day of May 2012, it appears to the Court that: 
 
(1) 
The plaintiff-appellant, Dawn Locke, as Next Friend of 
Kimberly Foth, a minor (the “appellant”), has petitioned this Court, pursuant 
to Supreme Court Rule 42, to accept an appeal from the interlocutory order 
of the Superior Court dated April 27, 2012, which denied the appellant’s 
 
2
motion for reargument of its March 2, 2012 order granting the appellees’ 
motion to enforce a settlement agreement.   
 
(2) 
The appellant filed her motion for certification to take an 
interlocutory appeal in the Superior Court on March 6, 2012.  On April 27, 
2012, the Superior Court denied the application for certification of an 
interlocutory appeal on the ground that the requirements of Supreme Court 
Rule 42 had not been met. 
 
(3) 
Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the 
sound discretion of this Court.  In the exercise of its discretion, the Court has 
concluded that the appellant’s interlocutory appeal fails to meet the 
requirements of Supreme Court Rule 42 and, therefore, must be refused. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the interlocutory appeal 
is REFUSED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Henry duPont Ridgely 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice