Title: RUTTER v. HEATLY
Citation: 180 P.2d 822, 1947 OK 163, 198 Okla. 591
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: May 13, 1947

RUTTER v. HEATLY Annotate this Case ATCHISON T. & S. F. RY. CO. v. RATH 1912 OK 313 124 P. 59 32 Okla. 857 Case Number: 1844 Decided: 05/14/1912 Supreme Court of Oklahoma ATCHISON, T. & S. F. RY. CO. v. RATH. Syllabus ¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR -- Dismissal -- Failure to File Briefs. Where plaintiff in error files no brief as required by rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi) of this court, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Error from Payne County Court; P. D. Mitchell, Judge. Action by William Rath against the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Dismissed. Cottingham & Bledsoe, Charles H. Woods, and Lowry & Lowry, for plaintiff in error. BREWER, C. ¶1 The petition in error and transcript of the record was filed in this court on July 6, 1910. The plaintiff in error has failed to file any brief in the case. The petition in error shall therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass et al. v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290 , 111 P. 543; Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 778 , 117 P. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287 , 119 P. 205. ¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.