Title: Chrichlow v. State
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 604, 2009
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: November 2, 2009

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
KEINO S. CHRICHLOW, 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
No. 604, 2009 
 
Defendant Below,  
 
§ 
 
Appellant,  
 
 
§ 
Court Below—Superior Court  
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
of the State of Delaware in and 
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
§ 
for New Castle County 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
STATE OF DELAWARE, 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
 
Plaintiff Below, 
 
 
§ 
Cr. ID No. 0611011396 
 
Appellee. 
 
 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: October 27, 2009 
 
 
 
 
Decided: 
November 2, 2009 
 
O R D E R 
 
 
This 2nd day of November 2009, it appears to the Court that: 
 
(1) 
On October 15, 2009, the appellant, Keino S. Chrichlow, filed a 
notice of appeal from the Superior Court’s September 17, 2009 denial of his 
request for transcript at State expense.  It appears that Chrichlow seeks the 
preparation of transcript to pursue postconviction relief. 
 
(2) 
On October 15, 2009, the Clerk issued a notice directing that 
Chrichlow show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to 
Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the Court’s lack of jurisdiction to consider a 
 
2
criminal interlocutory appeal.1  Chrichlow did not respond to the Clerk’s 
notice to show cause.  Dismissal of the appeal is deemed to be unopposed.2 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court 
Rules 3(b)(2)(b) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.   
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Jack B. Jacobs  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      Justice 
                                          
 
1 Under the Delaware Constitution, this Court may review only a final judgment in a 
criminal case.  Del. Const. art. IV, § 11(1)(b). 
2 Del. Supr. Ct. R. 3(b)(2)(b), 29(b).