Title: Ronnie Holden v. State of Indiana
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 49S02-0202-CR-153
State: Indiana
Issuer: Indiana Supreme Court
Date: December 3, 2003

Attorneys for Appellant                    Attorneys for Appellee  Gregory Bowes                            Steve Carter Indianapolis, Indiana                        Attorney General of Indiana 
                                 Richard C. Webster                                 Deputy Attorney General                                 Indianapolis, Indiana   
 ______________________________________________________________________________   In the  Indiana Supreme Court  _________________________________ 
 No. 49S02-0202-CR-153   Ronnie Holden,                                 Appellant (Defendant below), 
 v.   State of Indiana,                                 Appellee (Plaintiff below). _________________________________ 
 Appeal from the Marion Superior Court, No. 49G01-0006-CF-046689 The Honorable Tanya Walton Pratt, Judge _________________________________ 
 ON PETITION FOR REHEARING _________________________________ 
 December 3, 2003   Rucker, Justice.       Ronnie Holden seeks rehearing of our opinion in which we declared that Article I, Section 19 of the Indiana Constitution does not amount to a constitutionally permissible form of jury nullification. Holden v. State, 788 N.E.2d 1253 (Ind. 2003). Among other things Holden complains that we failed to address several issues raised before and decided by the Court of Appeals, whose Memorandum Decision was vacated once transfer was granted. Holden is correct. We therefore grant rehearing to summarily affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals on all issues except those addressed in our initial opinion. See Ind. Appellate Rule 58(A)(2). In all other respects the petition for rehearing is denied.   SHEPARD, C.J., and DICKSON, SULLIVAN and BOEHM, JJ., concur.