Title: HARRELL-DAVIS OIL CO. v. STATE INDUS. COM.
Citation: 175 Okla. 210, 1935 OK 1071, 51 P.2d 945
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: November 5, 1935

HARRELL-DAVIS OIL CO. v. STATE INDUS. COM. Annotate this Case HARRELL-DAVIS OIL CO. v. STATE INDUS. COM. 1935 OK 1071 51 P.2d 945 175 Okla. 210 Case Number: 26061 Decided: 11/05/1935 Supreme Court of Oklahoma HARRELL-DAVIS OIL CO. v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COM. et al. Syllabus ¶0 1. Master and Servant--Workmen's Compensation--Review of Awards--Conclusiveness of Findings of Fact. This court in reviewing an award for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law does not weigh controverted questions of fact. The findings of fact by the Industrial Commission are conclusive upon this court and will not be disturbed where there is any competent evidence reasonably tending to support the same. 2. Same--Award for Temporary Total Disability Affirmed. Record examined. Award affirmed. Original proceedings in the Supreme Court by the Harrell-Davis Oil Company to review an award of the State Industrial Commission in favor of W. C. Chandler. Affirmed. Freeling & Box and Dan Welch, for petitioner. Paul F. Showalter, for respondents. MCNEILL, C. J. ¶1 This is a proceeding to review an award of the State Industrial Commission. ¶2 The Commission made an award to the employee for temporary total disability. The employer challenges the award on the ground that the evidence was not sufficient to support the finding of the Commission. ¶3 The employee was an oil field worker, and, at the time of the accident in question, was engaged in placing a connection in a pipe line carrying oil. In making the connection it was necessary to dig a hole. The employee, in connection with other members, worked in this hole for a period of several hours, being relieved at frequent intervals by other workmen. While he was in the performance of such work he inhaled gas which came from the oil in the pipe line. The Commission found that temporary total disability resulted from the inhalation of the gas. ¶4 The findings of the commission on controverted questions of fact are binding on this court. Suffice it to say that the evidence was amply sufficient to sustain the finding that the employee suffered temporary total disability attributable to the inhaling of the gas in making the connection on the pipe line. The injury was compensable. We find no error. ¶5 The award is affirmed.