Title: Krogstad v. State
Citation: 2023 ND 30
Docket Number: 20220264
State: north-dakota
Issuer: north-dakota Supreme Court
Date: February 16, 2023

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2023 ND 30 Jeffrey Scott Krogstad, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee No. 20220264 Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable John A. Thelen, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, N.D., for petitioner and appellant; on brief. Andrew C. Eyre, Assistant State’s Attorney, Grand Forks, N.D., for respondent and appellee; on brief. FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT FEBRUARY 16, 2023 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 1 Krogstad v. State No. 20220264 Per Curiam. [¶1] Jeffrey Krogstad appeals from an order dismissing his application for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. He argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial attorney did not demand a speedy trial or secure an independent DNA test. He also asserts that the district court erred by failing to analyze whether he was prejudiced by counsel’s representation. We conclude the district court’s findings regarding the first prong, whether counsel’s conduct fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). Broadwell v. State, 2014 ND 6, ¶ 7, 841 N.W.2d 750 (“Courts need not address both elements of the ineffective assistance of counsel test, and if a court can dispose of the case by addressing only one element, it is encouraged to do so.”). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr