Title: Monk et al. v. Imaging Automation, Inc
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 229, 2002
State: Delaware
Issuer: Delaware Supreme Court
Date: August 29, 2002

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
  
BRUCE C. MONK and HOWARD 
DENTON, 
 
Petitioners Below- 
Appellants, 
 
v. 
 
IMAGING AUTOMATION, INC., 
 
Respondent Below- 
Appellee. 
 
§ 
§ 
§  No. 229, 2002 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below-Court of Chancery 
§  of the State of Delaware, 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§  C.A. No. 19290 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
 
Submitted: August 9, 2002 
  Decided:   August 29, 2002 
 
Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, WALSH and HOLLAND, Justices 
 
 
O R D E R 
 
This 29th day of August 2002, upon consideration of the briefs of the 
parties, it appears to the Court that the March 26, 2002 judgment of the Court 
of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons set forth in 
the Court of Chancery’s ruling from the bench dated March 21, 2002.  This 
matter is clearly controlled by this Court’s decision in Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 
v. W. S. Dickey Clay Mfg. Co., 24 A.2d 315 (Del. 1942).  See also Orban v. Field, 
1993 WL 547187 (Del. Ch.). 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court 
of Chancery is AFFIRMED. 
BY THE COURT: 
   s/Joseph T. Walsh 
       Justice