Title: Wolf v. SECOND DRAINAGE DISTRICT
Citation: 180 Kan. 312, 304 P.2d 473
Docket Number: 39,954
State: Kansas
Issuer: Kansas Supreme Court
Date: December 8, 1956

180 Kan. 312 (1956)
304 P.2d 473
WALTER F. WOLF and MYRTLE B. WOLF, Appellees,
v.
THE SECOND DRAINAGE DISTRICT OF FINNEY COUNTY, KANSAS, Appellant.
No. 39,954

Supreme Court of Kansas.
Opinion on rehearing filed December 8, 1956.
Daniel R. Hopkins, of Garden City, argued the cause and Ray H. Calihan and Ray H. Calihan, Jr., both of Garden City, were with him on the briefs for the appellant.
T.M. Lillard, of Topeka, argued the cause and O.B. Eidson, Philip H. Lewis, James W. Porter, Charles S. Fisher, Jr., and E. Gene McKinney, all of Topeka, and Dale H. Corley and Clyde P. Daniel, both of Garden City, were with him on the briefs for the appellees.
The opinion of the court was delivered by
SMITH, C.J.:
The opinion reversing the judgment of the trial court in this case was published June 9, 1956. (See Wolf v. Second Drainage District, 179 Kan. 655, 298 P.2d 305.) The petition of appellee for a rehearing was granted. The appeal was again argued October 29, 1956. Various holdings in the opinion were argued to be wrong. Amongst these was an argument that the original opinion held the plaintiff could not recover for damages to his land on account of defendant's deepening the original water channel. We did not intend so to hold. The decision reversing the judgment of the trial court is adhered to. The opinion is clarified, however, so that the third syllabus shall read:
The language of the opinion is clarified in conformance therewith so that it may read:
Any language in the original opinion in conflict with this is withdrawn.