Title: Hall Drive Ins, Inc. d/b/a Triangle Park v. City of Fort Wayne
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: 02S03-0109-CV-425
State: Indiana
Issuer: Indiana Supreme Court
Date: August 16, 2002

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT            ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE M. Scott Hall                        Martin T. Fletcher, Sr. Barnes &amp; Thornburg                Christine M. Stach Fort Wayne, Indiana                    Rothberg, Logan &amp; Warsco                             Fort Wayne, Indiana 
 
   In The  INDIANA SUPREME COURT   HALL DRIVE INS, INC. d/b/a            ) TRIANGLE PARK,                    )                             ) Defendant-Appellant,            ) )         v.                    )    O2S03-0109-CV-425                             ) CITY OF FORT WAYNE,             ) ) Plaintiff-Appellee.                )                             ) ________________________________________________ 
 APPEAL FROM THE ALLEN SUPERIOR COURT Cause No. 02D04-9912-OE-1134(A) ________________________________________________   On Petition To Transfer 
 
 August 16, 2002   DICKSON, Justice 
     The defendant-appellant, Halls Drive-Ins, Inc. d/b/a Triangle Park ("Triangle"), appeals from a judgment finding that it violated the City of Fort Wayne Smoking Ordinance. Fort Wayne, Ind., City Code Tit. IX, § 95.60-70 (1998). The Court of Appeals reversed, 747 N.E.2d 643 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001), and we granted transfer. 761 N.E.2d 418 (Ind. 2001). In accord with our decision today in the companion case of Hall Drive-Ins, Inc. d/b/a Don Hall's Guesthouse v. City of Fort Wayne, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. 2002), we conclude that Triangle does not fall within one of the exceptions provided in the ordinance, we affirm the trial court. The proceedings at trial and on appeal are substantially the same as those in Guesthouse. The two cases differ in the fact that Triangle was found to have violated the Smoking Ordinance because of the presence of smoking paraphernalia, an ashtray, in the Triangle bar area, contrary to Section 95.64(C) of the ordinance, whereas in Guesthouse, a patron was found smoking in its bar area. Triangle presents the same arguments as presented in Guesthouse, and we resolve them in the same way. The trial court is affirmed.  
 SHEPARD, C.J., and SULLIVAN, BOEHM, and RUCKER, JJ., concur.