Title: BOARD OF ED. OF CHICKASHA v. CITY OF CHICKASHA ex rel. POOL
Citation: 155 P.2d 723, 1945 OK 44, 195 Okla. 127
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: February 6, 1945

BOARD OF ED. OF CHICKASHA v. CITY OF CHICKASHA ex rel. POOL Annotate this Case LAIRD v. BANNON 1912 OK 193 122 P. 180 31 Okla. 627 Case Number: 2483 Decided: 03/12/1912 Supreme Court of Oklahoma LAIRD v. BANNON. Syllabus ¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Record--Review of Motions. Motions presented in the trial court, including a motion for a new trial and the ruling thereon and exceptions taken, are not a part of the record proper, and can be preserved and presented for review on appeal only by incorporating the same into a bill of exceptions or case-made. Error from Superior Court, Oklahoma County; A. N. Munden, Judge. Action between Samuel B. Laird and L. Bannon. From the judgment, Laird brings error. Dismissed. Jas. R. Lewis, for plaintiff in error. Thorp & Thorp, for defendant in error. DUNN, J. ¶1 This case presents error from the superior court of Oklahoma county. The proceeding is not instituted by either case-made or bill of exceptions, but is here upon a transcript of the record. The only assignment of error contained in the petition in error is that the court erred in overruling the motion of plaintiff in error for a new trial. A motion to dismiss has been filed by counsel for defendant in error for the reason that the record before us presents no error subject to review. This motion must be sustained. That motions are no part of the record proper and are not brought to this court on a transcript thereof, see McMechan v. Christy, 3 Okla. 301 , 41 P. 382, Tribal Development Co. et al. v. White Bros. et al., 28 Okla. 525 , 114 P. 736 , and cases therein cited. ¶2 The cause is, accordingly, dismissed. ¶3 TURNER, C. J., and HAYES and KANE, JJ., concur; WILLIAMS, J., absent, and not participating.