Title: BREWER v. MURRAY
Citation: 2012 OK 100
Docket Number: 
State: Oklahoma
Issuer: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Date: November 19, 2012

BREWER v. MURRAY Annotate this Case BREWER v. MURRAY 2012 OK 100 Case Number: 109282 Decided: 11/19/2012 THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE PERMANENT LAW REPORTS. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. ASHLEY BREWER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. JERRY LEON MURRAY, Defendant, and VICKY DYANNE JACKSON, Defendant/Appellee. ¶0 ORDER ¶1 Having considered the parties' notice of settlement, the Court's Order of October 23, 2012, the petition for certiorari and response thereto filed in the above styled and numbered cause, THE COURT DETERMINES: 1) Appellee's petition for certiorari should be dismissed. Goldman v. Goldman, 1994 OK 111, 883 P.2d 164 , 166; Order of this Court herein, October 23, 2012. 2) The opinion promulgated by the Court of Civil Appeals, Division II, in the above styled and numbered cause should be accorded precedential value and released for publication by order of this Court. Rule 1.200, Supreme Court Rules, 12 O.S. 2011, Ch. 15, App. 1; 20 O.S.2011 §§ 30.5 and 30.14. ¶2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Appellee's petition for certiorari is dismissed, and the Court of Civil Appeals opinion be accorded precedential value and released for publication by order of this Court. ¶3 DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE THIS 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2012. /S/CHIEF JUSTICE CONCUR: TAYLOR, C.J., WATT, EDMONDSON, REIF, GURICH, JJ. CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART: COLBERT, V.C.J., KAUGER, WINCHESTER, COMBS, JJ. WINCHESTER, J., Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part, with whom COLBERT, V.C.J., KAUGER and COMBS, JJ., join: I would concur to allow the parties to dismiss their case. I would not give this opinion precedential value.