Title: Gabriel Jock Kenon v. State of Florida
Citation: N/A
Docket Number: SC94-991
State: Florida
Issuer: Florida Supreme Court
Date: July 13, 2000

Supreme 
Court 
of 
Florida
 
____________
No. SC94991
____________
GABRIEL JOCK KENON,
Petitioner,
vs.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
[July 13, 2000]
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Kenon v. State, 724 So. 2d 716 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), a 
decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal citing as controlling authority its
opinion in Maddox v. State, 708 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), approved in
part, disapproved in part, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S367 (Fla. May 11, 2000).  We have
jurisdiction.  See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So. 2d 418, 420
(Fla. 1981).  Because the parties have not adequately briefed the merits of the
alleged sentencing errors in this case, we quash the decision below and remand for
1We decline to address the other issues raised by Kenon that are not the basis of our jurisdiction.
See, e.g., Wood v. State, 750 So. 2d 592, 595 n.3 (Fla. 1999); McMullen v. State, 714 So. 2d 368, 373
(Fla. 1998).
-2-
the district court's consideration in light of our opinion in Maddox.1
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and
QUINCE, JJ., concur.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND
IF FILED, DETERMINED.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - 
Direct Conflict
Fifth District - Case No. 5D97-3558 
(Orange County)
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Anne Moorman Reeves,  Assistant Public
Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, Florida,
for Petitioner
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Belle B. Schumann and Wesley
Heidt, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, Florida,
for Respondent