Case Title: Tahara v. Matson Terminals, Inc.

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: hawaii

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court

Date: 2006-06-30T00:00:00Z

Document:
LAW LIBRARY

g
=

wo, 26627 é

Bale

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAFT) =

 

  

QUENTIN HIDEYUKI TAHARA, Plaintiff-Appella:
Cross-Appellee,

 

ve.

MATSON TERMINALS, INC. ; MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY, INC. ;
McCABE, HAMILTON & RENNY CO., LTD.; INTERNATIONAL
LONGSHOREMEN AND WAREHOUSEMEN’S UNION, LOCAL 142;

and HENRY KREUTZ, JR., Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellees,

and
BRUCE GEORGE PERRY, Defendant -Appellee/Cross-Appellant,
and

JOHN DOBS 1-20, MARY DOES 1-20, DOR CORPORATION 1-20,
DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-20, DOE ASSOCIATES 1-20, DOE GOVERNMENTAL
AGENCIES 1-20, DOE STATES and OTHER ENTITIES 1-20, Defendants

APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT
(CIV. NO. 96-1204)

iKI_TAHARA’S MOTT: 7
(By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, and Nakayama, JJ.; Intermediate
Court’ of Appeals Associate Judge Lim, in place of
Acoba, J., recused; and Intermediate Court of Appeals
Associate Judge Fujise, in place of Duffy, J., recused)
Having considered plaintiff-appellant /cross-appellee Quentin

Hideyuki Tahara’s motion for reconsideration, filed guly 10,

2006, the papers in support thereof, and the record herein,

 
IT 18 HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i,
Jay Lawrence Priedheim

(of Admiralty Advocates) ,
and Mark McDougal and
Gregory Kafoury, (of
Karoury & MeDougal,
Portland, Oregon) ,

pro hac vice, for
plaintiff-appellant/
cross-appellee

Toe
Sha {flor

Daetce OS enetiy Oren

 

No. 26617 Tahara v. Matson Terminale, Inc. -- Order Denying

Plaintiff -Appellant/Cross-Appellee Quentin
Hideyuki Tahara’s Motion for Reconsideration