Case Title: In re Application of Tilson

Citation: 2011-Ohio-551

Docket Number: 20101703

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2011-02-15T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as In 
re Application of Tilson, Slip Opinion No. 2011-Ohio-551.] 
 
 
NOTICE 
This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in 
an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports.  Readers are requested 
to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 
65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or 
other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be 
made before the opinion is published. 
 
SLIP OPINION NO. 2011-OHIO-551 
IN RE APPLICATION OF TILSON. 
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it 
may be cited as In re Application of Tilson, Slip Opinion No. 2011-Ohio-551.] 
Attorneys at law — Character and fitness of candidate for admission to the bar — 
Failure to comply with contract with the Ohio Lawyers Assistance 
Program — Application disapproved. 
(No. 2010-1703 — Submitted January 4, 2011 — Decided February 15, 2011.) 
ON REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Character and 
Fitness of the Supreme Court, No. 457. 
__________________ 
 
Per Curiam. 
{¶ 1} Jason Raymond Tilson of Gahanna, Ohio, received his M.B.A. 
from the Ohio State University Fisher College of Business in June 2008 and his 
J.D. from the Moritz College of Law in June 2009.  He has applied to register as a 
candidate for admission to the Ohio bar and has filed an application to take the 
Ohio bar examination administered in February 2010.  Based upon the applicant’s 
two convictions for operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol (“OVI”) 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 
2 
 
and his failure to comply with the terms of his contract with the Ohio Lawyers 
Assistance Program (“OLAP”), the Board of Commissioners on Character and 
Fitness recommends that we disapprove the applicant’s current application but 
permit him to apply for the July 2011 bar examination.  We accept the board’s 
findings of fact and recommendation. 
Summary of Proceedings 
{¶ 2} In January 2010, the admissions committee of the Columbus Bar 
Association recommended that the applicant’s character, fitness, and moral 
qualifications to practice law be approved.  The applicant was not permitted to 
take the February 2010 bar examination, however, because the board did not 
submit final approval of his character and fitness.  Instead, the board exercised its 
investigatory authority sua sponte to review the applicant’s (1) 2007 honor code 
violation in an M.B.A. class, (2) neglect of his financial obligations and 2008 
bankruptcy, and (3) his alcohol abuse.  See Gov.Bar I (10)(B)(2)(e). 
{¶ 3} A panel of the board conducted a formal hearing.  The applicant 
testified that on the advice of counsel, he had entered into an OLAP contract 
following his 2008 arrest for OVI, which enabled him to obtain a favorable 
sentence for that offense.  The OLAP contract required him to refrain from using 
alcohol or drugs, to attend 90 Alcoholics Anonymous meetings within 90 days, 
and to attend at least three meetings per week for the remainder of the two-year 
contract.  The applicant, however, attended approximately one meeting per week 
after the first 90 days, and failed to keep a log of that attendance.  He claimed that 
he stopped attending meetings regularly because he was “not getting anything out 
of it.”  Realizing that noncompliance with his OLAP contract could affect his 
application for admission to the bar, he agreed to extend the contract for an 
additional year, to June 2011, but made no effort to comply with its terms.  He 
also admitted that he continued to consume alcohol. 
January Term, 2011 
3 
 
{¶ 4} Citing the applicant’s 2006 and 2008 convictions for OVI and his 
failure to comply with his OLAP contract, the panel recommended that the 
applicant’s character and fitness be disapproved and that he be permitted to apply 
for the February 2011 bar examination. 
{¶ 5} The board agreed that the applicant should be disapproved, but 
recommended that he be permitted to apply for the July 2011 bar examination, 
provided that he submit to a full character and fitness investigation by the 
appropriate bar association admissions committee. 
Disposition 
{¶ 6} An applicant to the Ohio bar must prove by clear and convincing 
evidence that he or she “possesses the requisite character, fitness, and moral 
qualifications for admission to the practice of law.”  Gov.Bar R. I(11)(D)(1).  The 
applicant’s record must justify “the trust of clients, adversaries, courts, and others 
with respect to the professional duties owed to them.”  Gov.Bar R. I(11)(D)(3).  
“A record manifesting a significant deficiency in the honesty, trustworthiness, 
diligence, or reliability of an applicant may constitute a basis for disapproval of 
the applicant.”  Id. 
{¶ 7} In determining that the applicant has not proved that he possesses 
the requisite character, fitness, and moral qualifications, the board focused upon 
evidence of the applicant’s existing and untreated alcohol dependency.  See 
Gov.Bar R. I(11)(D)(3)(b).  The evidence demonstrates that the applicant has had 
two OVI convictions in the past five years.  Although he entered into an OLAP 
contract to address his difficulties with alcohol, he has not complied with even the 
most basic term of that contract, which requires him to “[t]otally refrain from the 
use of all mood altering substances, including alcohol.”  Although he attended 
Alcoholics Anonymous meetings for a time, he failed to keep a regular log of that 
attendance, failed to achieve his attendance goals after the first 90 days, and 
stopped making required weekly telephone calls to the OLAP office.  Moreover, 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 
4 
 
he has failed to submit any evidence that he has sought an evaluation or treatment 
recommendation from any of the treatment centers recommended by OLAP, let 
alone that he has followed any treatment recommendation.  In light of the 
applicant’s failure to follow through with his commitment to the OLAP program 
and prove that he has overcome his problems with alcohol, his claims that he has 
“grown up” and learned from his mistakes ring hollow. 
{¶ 8} Based upon the foregoing, we agree that the applicant has failed to 
prove that he currently possesses the requisite character, fitness, and moral 
qualifications for admission to the practice of law.  Therefore, we disapprove his 
application to take the bar exam at this time.  The applicant may apply to take the 
July 2011 bar examination, and in doing so shall submit to a full character and 
fitness investigation by the appropriate bar association admissions committee. 
Judgment accordingly. 
 
O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, 
LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. 
__________________ 
Jason Raymond Tilson, pro se. 
William A. Reddington, for the Columbus Bar Association. 
______________________