Case Title: Baird v. State

Citation: 

Docket Number: 218, 2009

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2009-06-29T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
STEVEN J. BAIRD, JR.,  
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
No. 218, 2009 
 
Petitioner Below,  
 
§ 
 
Appellant,  
 
 
§ 
Court Below—Superior Court  
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
of the State of Delaware in and 
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
§ 
for Sussex County 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
STATE OF DELAWARE, 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
 
 
Respondent Below, 
 
§ 
C. A. No. S09X-02-002 
 
Appellee. 
 
 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: June 23, 2009 
 
 
 
 
Decided: 
June 29, 2009 
 
O R D E R 
 
 
This 29th day of June 2009, the Court has considered the Clerk’s 
notice directing that appellant, Steven J. Baird, Jr., show cause pursuant to 
Supreme Court Rule 29(b) why this appeal should not be dismissed for 
Baird’s failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by not arranging for 
payment to the court reporter of the transcript ordered for the appeal.  Baird 
has not responded to the notice to show cause.  Baird’s failure to respond to 
the notice to show cause is deemed to be his consent to the dismissal of the 
appeal. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court 
Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Henry duPont Ridgely 
 
Justice