Case Title: Fessler v. Hannagan, Geelhard, et al. (Per Curiam Order)

Citation: 

Docket Number: 119 MAP 2006

State: pennsylvania

Court: Pennsylvania Supreme Court

Date: 2007-06-04T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT JOSEPH A. FESSLER AND ANN FESSLER, HIS WIFE v. LEONORA HANNAGAN, RICHARD GEELHARD, MANNY WHITMEN, JOHN WOJTOWICZ, RONALD HILLARD, LEWIS ATTORDO, DWIGHT DAVIES, THOMAS MORRISARY, HUGH MUNDY, LEON CASE, THE CITY OF WILKES-BARRE, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR CAPACITIES AS EMPLOYEES OF REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF WILKES-BARRE, LAWRENCE SINDACO, ESQ., FLANAGAN, DORAN, BISCONTINI AND SHAFFER, JAMES PALERMO, ESQ., SANDRA SERNAK, ESQ., DAVID MILLER, ESQ., WILKES- BARRE, CITY ZONING, PAUL CAIN, WILLIAM THOMPSON, KENNETH FINLAYSON, ROBERT KAPLAN, MARTIN J. MYER AND JOHN SWATKOSLI, APPEAL OF: MICHAEL SHEMONSKY : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 119 MAP 2006 Appeal from the per curiam Order of the Commonwealth Court dated October 11, 2006 at No. 1642 CD 1991. ORDER PER CURIAM DECIDED: June 1, 2007 The Order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed.