Case Title: Boggs v. Treptor

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2000-10-12T00:00:00Z

Document:
Boggs v. Treptor  Download PDF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DANIEL A. BOGGS, JR. Petitioner BelowAppellant, v. DENISE M. TREPTOR, Respondent BelowAppellee. § § § § § § § § § § § No. 486, 2000 Court Below Family Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County File No. CN94-11387 Submitted: October 10, 2000 Decided: October 12, 2000 Before HOLLAND, BERGER and STEELE, Justices ORDER This 12th day of October 2000, it appears to the Court that: (1) On September 14, 2000, this Court dismissed the appeal of the petitioner-appellant, Daniel A. Boggs, Jr., as interlocutory. 1 On September 26, 2000, this Court denied Boggs motion for reargument. Boggs has now filed another appeal from essentially the same orders he Boggs appealed from orders of the Family Court dated June 5, 2000, June 7, 2000, June 8, 2000, June 9, 2000, June 12, 2000, August 1, 2000 and August 2, 2000. 1 appealed from previously. 2 The appeal must, therefore, be dismissed as moot. (2) We further conclude that Boggs most recent appeal is repetitive and frivolous and was filed in knowing defiance of the previous Orders of this Court. As such, it is necessary to restrict Boggs ability to attempt any further appeals to this Court in this matter3 pending the issuance of a final order by the Family Court. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED.4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed not to docket any further filings by Boggs in this matter pending the issuance of a final order of the Family Court. 5 BY THE COURT: Randy J. Holland Justice 2 Boggs does not appeal from the order of the Family Court dated August 2, 2000. 3 This includes No. 425, 2000 as well as the instant appeal. 4 Supr. Ct. R. 29(c). 5 Stroud v. Milliken Enterprises, Inc., Del. Supr., 552 A.2d 476, 481-82 (1989). 2