Case Title: Wolford v. State

Citation: 

Docket Number: 345, 2016

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2016-10-25T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
DUSTIN M. WOLFORD, 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
No. 345, 2016 
 
Defendant Below,  
 
§ 
 
Appellant,  
 
 
§ 
Court Below—Superior Court of the 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
State of Delaware 
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
Cr. ID Nos. 1108016428 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
 
 
1209017309 
STATE OF DELAWARE, 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
 
Plaintiff Below, 
 
 
§ 
 
Appellee. 
 
 
 
§ 
 
Submitted: August 23, 2016 
Decided: 
October 25, 2016 
 
Before HOLLAND, VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices. 
 
O R D E R 
 
 
This 25th day of October 2016, upon consideration of the appellant’s opening 
brief, the appellee’s motion to affirm, and the Superior Court record, it appears to 
the Court that: 
 
(1) 
On December 5, 2011, the appellant, Dustin M. Wolford, pled guilty 
to Burglary in the Third Degree and was sentenced to three years at Level V, 
suspended for probation.  On January 7, 2013, Wolford pled guilty to Possession of 
Child Pornography and was sentenced to three years at Level V, suspended for 
probation.  Burglary in the Third Degree and Possession of Child Pornography are 
2 
 
both class F felonies.1  The statutory maximum for a class F felony is three years in 
prison.2     
(2) 
On June 27, 2014, Wolford was convicted of violation of probation 
(“VOP”) and was sentenced, under 11 Del.  C. § 4204(k), to a total of four years in 
prison, two years for Burglary in the Third Degree (hereinafter “burglary”) and two 
years for Possession of Child Pornography (hereinafter “child pornography”).  It 
was Wolford’s fourth VOP in the burglary case and his second VOP in the child 
pornography case.  Under § 4204(k), Wolford is required to serve both two-year 
VOP sentences without any “form of reduction or diminution of sentence” such as 
good time credits.3 
(3) 
On May 16, 2016, Wolford filed a motion for correction of sentence 
under Superior Court Criminal Rule 35(a).  By order dated June 3, 2016, the 
Superior Court denied the motion.  This appeal followed. 
(4) 
On appeal, observing that 11 Del. C. § 4204(k) can be applied only to 
sentences of one year or less or to sentences imposing the statutory maximum,4 
Wolford contends that the two-year VOP sentences for burglary and child 
                                                          
 
1 11 Del. C. § § 824, 1111.  
2 11 Del. C. § 4205(b)(6). 
3 11 Del. C. § 4204(k)(1). 
4 See 11 Del. C. § 4204(k)(3) (“The provisions of this subsection shall be applicable only to 
sentences of imprisonment at Level V for 1 year or less, or to sentences of imprisonment at Level 
V which are equal to the statutory maximum Level V sentence available for the crime or 
offense.”).  
3 
 
pornography in his case do not fit that criteria.  According to Wolford, the Superior 
Court must either reduce the two-year sentences to one year each or remove the 
§ 4204(k) restriction from the sentences.  Wolford’s claim is without merit.   
(5) 
As previously noted, Burglary in the Third Degree and Possession of 
Child Pornography are both class F felonies for which the maximum penalty is 
three years at Level V.5  In this case, Wolford was originally sentenced to three 
years at Level V, suspended for probation, for both burglary and child 
pornography.  When sentencing Wolford on the June 27, 2014 VOP, the Superior 
Court properly applied § 4204(k) to the Level V time remaining on each of those 
sentences.6 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is 
GRANTED.  The judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Karen L. Valihura 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice 
                                                          
 
5 Supra notes 1, 2. 
6 See Ingram v. State, 567 A.2d 868, 869 (Del. 1989) (ruling that, on a VOP, the Superior Court 
can impose § 4204(k) on the re-imposition of the original term of imprisonment); see also Owens 
v. State, 2013 WL 6536758, at *2 (Del. Dec. 9, 2013) (“Read together, subsections 4204(k)(1) 
and (3) allow a trial court to suspend a portion of the maximum sentence and refuse to award 
specified benefits that would effectively diminish the unsuspended portion of the sentence.”).