Case Title: Shah a/k/a Lindsey v. State

Citation: 

Docket Number: 665, 2010

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2011-04-11T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
KUSHAL SHAH a/k/a GERRON 
LINDSEY, 
 
Defendant Below- 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
STATE OF DELAWARE, 
 
Plaintiff Below- 
Appellee. 
§ 
§  No. 665, 2010 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below—Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware, 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§  Cr. ID 0002019769 
§ 
§ 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: February 25, 2011 
 
 
 
 
  Decided: April 11, 2011 
 
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, JACOBS, and RIDGELY, Justices. 
 
O R D E R 
 
 
This 11th day of April 2011, upon consideration of the parties’ briefs and the 
record on appeal, we find it manifest that the judgment below should be affirmed 
on the basis of the Superior Court’s October 7, 2010 decision. The trial court did 
not err in concluding that appellant’s sixth motion for postconviction relief was 
procedurally barred as untimely, repetitive, and previously adjudicated and that 
appellant had failed to overcome these procedural hurdles. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 
Court is AFFIRMED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Henry duPont Ridgely 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice