Case Title: Barnhard v. Kearney

Citation: 

Docket Number: 97160

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2007-06-18T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JOHN BARNHARD, §
§ No. 26, 2007

Petitioner Below- §
Appellant, 5

§ Court Below~Superior Court
v § of the State of Delaware

§ in and for Sussex County
RICK KEARNEY, Warden, and § C.A. No. 07M-01-005

CARL C. DANBERG, Attomey §

General, 5

5

Respondents Below §

Appellees. 5
ORDER

‘This 18" day of June 2007, the Clerk issued a notice dated May 22,

2007, dire

 

the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be

dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for his failure to diligently

 

prosecute the appeal by not filing his opening brief and appendix. The
‘appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the
required ten-day period. Dismissal of this action is, therefore, deemed to be
‘unopposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court
Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:

[si Myron T. Steele
Chief Justice