Case Title: State v. Towe

Citation: 1998-Ohio-703

Docket Number: 19980604

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 1998-10-13T00:00:00Z

Document:
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. TOWE, APPELLANT. 
[Cite as State v. Towe (1998), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] 
Criminal procedure — Classification as sexual predator — Court of appeals’ 
judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Cook — APPEAL dismissed as 
improvidently allowed on Propositions of Law Nos. III, IV, and V. 
(Nos. 98-604 and 98-606 — Submitted October 13, 1998 — Decided November 
25, 1998.) 
APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-
970283. 
__________________ 
 
Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Sherry 
Green, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. 
 
Schuh & Goldberg and J. Robert Andrews, for appellant. 
__________________ 
 
The judgment of the court of appeals on Propositions of Law Nos. I and II is 
affirmed on the authority of State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 
570. 
 
Propositions of Law Nos. III, IV, and V are dismissed as having been 
improvidently allowed. 
 
DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., 
concur. 
 
MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., concur in part and dissent in part. 
__________________ 
 
Cook, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.  I dissent from the 
dismissal of Propositions of Law Nos. III, IV, and V. 
 
MOYER, C.J., concurs in the foregoing opinion.