Case Title: State ex rel. King v. Indus. Comm.

Citation: 2001-Ohio-43

Docket Number: 20001212

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2001-04-25T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as State ex rel. King v. Indus. Comm., 91 Ohio St.3d 378, 2001-Ohio-43.] 
1 
 
 
THE STATE EX REL. KING, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO 
ET AL., APPELLEES. 
[Cite as State ex rel. King v. Indus. Comm. (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 378.] 
Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. 
(No. 00-1212 — Submitted February 27, 2001 — Decided April 25, 2001.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-605. 
__________________ 
 
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the 
opinion of the court of appeals. 
 
MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. 
 
RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent and would reverse the judgment 
of the court of appeals. 
 
DOUGLAS, J., dissents. 
__________________ 
 
McCrory & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Kurt M. Young, for appellant. 
 
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Dennis H. Behm, Assistant 
Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. 
 
Bugbee & Conkle and Richard L. Johnson, for appellee Toledo Stamping 
& Manufacturing Company. 
__________________