Case Title: Ryan v. Accardi

Citation: 

Docket Number: 224, 2023

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2024-02-26T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
WALTER E. RYAN, JR. and RYAN 
ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC on 
Behalf of Themselves and All Others 
Similarly Situated, 
 
 
Plaintiffs Below,  
Appellants, 
 
v. 
 
TRACY ACCARDI, JAMES R. 
BERGMAN, JOSEPH R. 
BRONSON, TUNC DOLUCA, 
ROBERT E. GRADY, MERCEDES 
JOHNSON, WILLIAM P. 
SULLIVAN, WILLIAM D. 
WATKINS, MARYANN WRIGHT, 
and ANALOG DEVICES, INC., 
                                                                 
Defendants Below,                             
          Appellees.                                  
     § 
     §            No. 224, 2023 
     § 
     §            Court Below—Court of 
     §            Chancery of the State of 
     §            Delaware 
     §   
     §            C.A No. 2022-0255 
     §                     
     § 
     § 
     § 
     § 
     § 
     § 
     § 
     § 
     § 
     § 
     § 
     § 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: February 14, 2024 
 
 
 
 
Decided: 
February 26, 2024 
 
Before TRAYNOR, LEGROW, and GRIFFITHS, Justices. 
 
ORDER 
This 26th day of February 2024, after careful consideration of the parties’ 
briefs and the record below, and following oral argument, we find it evident that the 
judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the 
reasons stated in its May 2, 2023 order and transcript ruling granting appellees’ 
2 
 
motion to dismiss appellants’ complaint and its May 30, 2023 order denying 
appellants’ motion for reargument. 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of 
Chancery is AFFIRMED. 
BY THE COURT: 
 
/s/ N. Christopher Griffiths 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      Justice