Case Title: Lum v. State

Citation: 

Docket Number: 169, 2007

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2007-12-20T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
RICHARD H. LUM, JR., 
 
 
Defendant Below- 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
STATE OF DELAWARE, 
 
Plaintiff Below- 
Appellee. 
§ 
§ 
§  No. 169, 2007 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below—Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware, 
§  in and for Sussex County 
§  Cr. ID 88S01376DI 
§   
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: September 27, 2007 
 
 
 
 
Decided: 
December 20, 2007 
 
Before BERGER, JACOBS, and RIDGELY, Justices. 
 
O R D E R 
 
This 20th day of December 2007, after careful consideration of the parties’ 
briefs and the record below, we find it manifest that the judgment below should be 
affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court=s well-reasoned decision dated March 
22, 2007.  The Superior Court did not err in concluding that appellant’s motion for 
postconviction relief was time-barred and that appellant had failed to overcome 
this procedural hurdle.  
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 
Court is AFFIRMED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
      
 
 
 
 
 
 /s/ Jack B. Jacobs  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice