Case Title: Abel v. Kowalski

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: arkansas

Court: Arkansas Supreme Court

Date: 1996-01-22T00:00:00Z

Document:
Allen ABEL and Liberty Real Estate, et al. v.
Andrew KOWALSKI

94-988                                             ___ S.W.2d ___

                    Supreme Court of Arkansas
               Opinion delivered January 22, 1996


1.   Attorney & client -- one who is not licensed attorney may not
     practice law in Arkansas. -- One who is not a licensed
     attorney may not practice law in Arkansas.

2.   Appeal & error -- matter returned to court of appeals --
     appellate court directed to have appellants promptly file
     briefs. -- Where the appeal record reflected that the original
     transcript in the present case was filed in the court of
     appeals on September 15, 1994, and appellants were granted at
     least five extensions to file a brief, the last of which was
     on November 6, 1995, but the court of appeals, giving no
     reason for doing so, certified the case to the supreme court
     on December 13, 1995, the supreme court returned the matter to
     the court of appeals, directing the court of appeals to strike
     any motions filed by the unlicensed party on behalf of others
     and to have appellants promptly file their briefs and to
     dismiss appellants' appeal if they fail to do so.


     Motion to Supplement the Record; Certified to Court of Appeals
with Directions.
     Bill Hatch, pro se.
     No response.

     Per Curiam.*ARKREP9*






ALLEN ABEL AND LIBERTY REAL
ESTATE, ET AL.,
                    APPELLANT,

V.

ANDREW KOWALSKI,
                    APPELLEE.



94-988

Opinion Delivered:  1-22-96

MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD





CERTIFY TO COURT OF APPEALS
WITH DIRECTIONS





                           PER CURIAM

     A Bill Hatch purportedly appears pro se, but tenders a motion
on behalf of appellants Allen Abel and Liberty Real Estate,
requesting certain documents be added to the record on appeal. 
First, we note that Hatch is not a licensed attorney and may not
practice law in Arkansas.  See Ark. Code Ann.  16-22-206 (1987);
see also All City Glass & Mirror, Inc. v. McGraw Hill Information
Sys. Co., 295 Ark. 520,