Case Title: Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Fidler

Citation: 2000-Ohio-40

Docket Number: 

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2000-09-08T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Fidler, 90 Ohio St.3d 1206, 2000-Ohio-40.] 
 
 
 
 
 
CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. FIDLER. 
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Fidler (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 1206.] 
(No. 97-2641 — Submitted and decided September 8, 2000.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR TERMINATION OF PROBATION. 
 
On July 24, 2000, respondent filed an application for termination of 
probation.  The court finds that respondent has substantially complied with 
Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D) and with its June 8, 1999 order. 
 
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the probation of Mark W. 
Fidler, Attorney Registration No. 0020309, last known business address in 
Cincinnati, Ohio, be, and hereby is, terminated. 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, by the court, that within ninety 
days of the date of this order, respondent shall reimburse any amounts that have 
been awarded against the respondent by the Clients’ Security Fund pursuant to 
Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F).  It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that if, after 
the date of this order, the Clients’ Security Fund awards any amount against the 
respondent pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), the respondent shall reimburse that 
amount to the Clients’ Security Fund within ninety days of the notice of such 
award. 
 
 
2
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified 
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be 
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs 
of publication. 
 
For earlier cases, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Fidler (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 
396, 700 N.E.2d 323, and Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Fidler (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 
1201, 711 N.E.2d 690. 
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and 
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.