Case Title: Grix, D. v. Progressive Specialty Insurance - No. (Granted) (petitions for allowance of appeal)

Citation: 

Docket Number: 76 MAL 2020

State: pennsylvania

Court: Pennsylvania Supreme Court

Date: 2020-11-03T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT DANIEL AND CATHLEEN GRIX, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF NAOMI GRIX, DECEASED, Petitioner v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 76 MAL 2020 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 3rd day of November, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioners, are: .(1) Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the Decedent was not a resident of her parents’ household at the time of her death even though she was listed as a “household driver” on the household insurance policy, a premium was charged, and the facts overwhelmingly establish she was also a “resident” of the household at the time of her death? (2) Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the Decedent was not a “designated insured” entitled to stacking even though the Decedent was listed on her parents’ policy as a “driver and household resident” and premiums were charged up through and until the time of her tragic death?