Case Title: MARVIN KENNETH SHUE v. THE STATE OF WYOMING

Citation: 

Docket Number: S-11-0201

State: wyoming

Court: Wyoming Supreme Court

Date: 2012-05-24T00:00:00Z

Document:
MARVIN KENNETH SHUE v. THE STATE OF WYOMING2012 WY 73Case Number: S-11-0201Decided: 05/24/2012This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in Pacific Reporter Third.  Readers are requested to notify the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Supreme Court Building, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002, of any typographical or other formal errors so that correction may be made before final publication in the permanent volume.  
April 
Term, A.D. 2012
 
MARVIN 
KENNETH SHUE,Appellant(Defendant),v.THE STATE OF 
WYOMING,Appellee(Plaintiff).
 
 
Order 
Affirming the Judgment and Sentence of the District Court
 
[¶1]      This matter 
came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that appellant 
has not filed a pro se brief within 
the time allotted by this Court.  
Appellant pled guilty to one count of sexual abuse of a minor in the 
first degree.  This is Appellant’s 
direct appeal from that conviction.  
On March 5, 2012, Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel filed a 
“Motion to Withdraw as Counsel,” pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 
87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967).  Following a careful review of the record 
and the “Anders brief” submitted by 
counsel, this Court, on March 27, 2012, entered its “Order Granting Permission 
for Court Appointed Counsel to Withdraw.”  
That Order notified Appellant that the District Court’s June 2, 2011 
“Judgment and Sentence” would be affirmed unless, on or before May 11, 2012, 
Appellant filed a brief that persuaded this Court that the captioned appeal is 
not wholly frivolous.  Taking note 
that Appellant, Marvin Kenneth Shue, has not filed a brief or other pleading 
within the time allotted, the Court finds that the district court’s “Judgment 
and Sentence” should be affirmed.  
It is, therefore, 
 
[¶2]     ORDERED 
that the District Court’s June 2, 2011 
“Judgment and Sentence” be, and the same hereby is, 
affirmed.
 
[¶3]     DATED this 24th day of May, 
2012.
                                                

 
                                                         BY THE COURT:
                                    
                        
    

                                                                        
/s/
 
            
                                                            
MARILYN S. KITE