Case Title: Harold Grill 2 IRA, et al. v. Chenevert, et al.

Citation: 

Docket Number: 390, 2013

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2013-12-19T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
HAROLD GRILL 2 IRA,  
 
§ 
Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal  
§  No. 390, 2013 
Defendant UNITED  
 
 
§ 
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, §  Court Below – Court of Chancery 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§  of the State of Delaware 
 
 
Plaintiff Below, 
 
§  C.A. No. 7999 
 
 
Appellant,  
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
LOUIS R. CHÊNEVERT, JOHN V. § 
FARACI, JEAN-PIERRE GARNIER, 
§ 
JAMIE S. GORELICK, EDWARD A. 
§ 
KANGAS, ELLEN J. KULLMAN,  § 
MARSHALL O. LARSEN,  
 
§ 
RICHARD D. MCCORMICK,   
§ 
HAROLD MCGRAW III, RICHARD § 
B. MYERS, H. PATRICK  
 
§ 
SWYGERT, ANDRE  
 
 
§ 
VILLENEUVE, CHRISTINE TODD § 
WHITMAN, and GEORGE DAVID, § 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
 
 
Defendants Below, 
 
§ 
 
 
Appellees,  
 
§ 
and 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES   
§ 
CORPORATION,  
 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
Nominal Defendant. 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
    Submitted:  December 18, 2013 
 
 
 
 
        Decided:  December 19, 2013 
 
Before HOLLAND, BERGER, JACOBS and RIDGELY, Justices and 
CARPENTER, Judge,1 constituting the Court en Banc. 
 
                                          
 
1 Sitting by designation pursuant to Del. Const. art. IV, § 12 and Supr. Ct. R. 2 and 4. 
O R D E R 
 
This 19th day of December 2013, the Court, having considered this 
matter after oral argument and on the briefs filed by the parties, has 
determined that the final judgment of the Court of Chancery should be 
affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Court of 
Chancery in its opinion dated June 24, 2013. 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment 
of the Court of Chancery be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED. 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Randy J. Holland 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice