Case Title: Disciplinary Counsel v. Anselmi

Citation: 2005-Ohio-4099

Docket Number: 20051005

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2005-07-14T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Anselmi, 106 Ohio St.3d 1204, 2005-Ohio-4099.] 
 
 
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ANSELMI. 
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Anselmi,  
106 Ohio St.3d 1204, 2005-Ohio-4099.] 
Attorneys at law – Reciprocal discipline from the State of Michigan Attorney 
Discipline Board – Public reprimand – Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F)(4). 
(No. 2005-1005 – Submitted July 8, 2005 – Decided July 14, 2005.) 
ON CERTIFIED ORDER of the State of Michigan Attorney  
Discipline Board, Case No. 03-161-GA. 
__________________ 
{¶ 1} This cause is pending before the Supreme Court of Ohio in 
accordance with the reciprocal discipline provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F). 
{¶ 2} On June 6, 2005, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed with this court 
a certified copy of an order of the State of Michigan Attorney Discipline Board 
entered June 23, 2004, in Grievance Administrator v. Kurt Anthony Anselmi, in 
Case No. 03-161-GA, reprimanding respondent.  On June 15, 2005, this court 
ordered respondent to show cause why identical or comparable discipline should 
not be imposed in this state.  Respondent filed a response to the show cause order.  
This cause was considered by the court and on consideration thereof, 
{¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by this court that, pursuant to 
Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F)(4), respondent, Kurt Anthony Anselmi, Attorney 
Registration No. 0064192, last known business address in Bloomfield Hills, 
Michigan, be publicly reprimanded. 
{¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, by the court that, within 
90 days of the date of this order, respondent shall reimburse any amounts that 
have been awarded against the respondent by the Clients’ Security Fund pursuant 
to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F).  It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that if, 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 
2 
after the date of this order, the Clients’ Security Fund awards any amount against 
the respondent pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), the respondent shall reimburse 
that amount to the Clients’ Security Fund within 90 days of the notice of such 
award. 
{¶ 5} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that all documents filed 
with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules 
of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, 
number, and timeliness of filings. 
{¶ 6} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that service shall be 
deemed made on respondent by sending this order, and all other orders in this 
case, by certified mail to the most recent address respondent has given to the 
Attorney Registration Section. 
{¶ 7} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue 
certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that 
publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that 
respondent bear the costs of publication. 
MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, 
O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. 
______________________