Case Title: Amendments To Florida Rule Of Judicial Administration 2.085, Time Standards

Citation: 

Docket Number: SC04-854

State: florida

Court: Florida Supreme Court

Date: 2004-11-18T00:00:00Z

Document:
Supreme Court of Florida 
 
_____________ 
 
No. SC04-854 
_____________ 
 
 
 
AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF JUDICIAL 
ADMINISTRATION 2.085, TIME STANDARDS 
 
[November 18, 2004] 
 
PER CURIAM. 
At the request of the Court, the Florida Bar’s Rules of Judicial 
Administration Committee has filed an out-of-cycle report of proposed 
amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.085(e)(1), Trial Court 
Time Standards.  We have jurisdiction.  See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const; Fla. R. Jud. 
Admin. 2.130(f). 
In Amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration (2-year 
Cycle), 851 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 2003), the Court adopted amendments to the time 
standards for juvenile delinquency and dependency hearings.  The amendments 
were proposed by the Rules of Judicial Administration Committee in its 
regular-cycle report of proposed rules changes.  The Steering Committee on 
 
 
- 2 - 
Families and Children in the Court (Steering Committee) filed a comment in the 
prior case suggesting time standards for juvenile delinquency and dependency 
hearings different from those adopted by the Court.  The Steering Committee also 
urged the adoption of time standards for permanency hearings and termination of 
parental right proceedings.  See id. at 701.  At the suggestion of the Chair of the 
Rules of Judicial Administration Committee at oral argument, the Court referred 
the Steering Committee’s suggestions to the Juvenile Court Rules Committee for 
consideration.  See id at 701. 
After considering the proposals, The Juvenile Court Rules Committee 
approved the Steering Committee’s proposed time standards for delinquency and 
dependency hearings as well as a twelve-month time standard for completion of a 
permanency hearing.  Although the Juvenile Court Rules Committee agreed with 
the Steering Committee that a time standard for termination of parental rights cases 
was desirable, it did not recommend such a standard because of the uncertainty 
involved in completing diligent searches for absent parents. 
The chairs of the Juvenile Court Rules Committee and the Rules of Judicial 
Administration Committee agreed that the Rules of Judicial Administration 
Committee should consider the proposed time standards before they were 
submitted to the Court.  The Rules of Judicial Administration Committee then also 
approved the proposals and filed the instant report with the Court.  The proposed 
 
 
- 3 - 
amendments to rule 2.085(e)(1) were published for comment.   No comments were 
filed. 
After considering the Steering Committee’s proposed time standards and the 
rules committees’ approval of the proposals, we amend rules 
2.085(e)(1)(E)(Juvenile Delinquency), and 2.085(e)(1)(F)(Juvenile Dependency) 
as reflected in the appendix to this opinion.  We also adopt new rule 
2.085(e)(1)(G)(Permanency Proceedings).  The new time standards generally 
reflect time requirements in chapters 39 and 985, Florida Statutes (2004), and are 
intended to further the goal of expeditiously concluding court proceedings 
involving children.   Additions to the rule are indicated by underscoring; deletions 
are indicated by struck-through type.  The amendments shall become effective 
January 1, 2005, at 12:01 a.m. 
It is so ordered.   
 
 
PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and 
BELL, JJ., concur. 
 
 
THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER THE 
EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 4 - 
An Original Proceedings  -  Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.085,  
Time Standards 
 
Stanford R. Solomon, Chair, Florida Rules of Judicial Administration Committee 
of the Solomon Tropp Law Group, P.A., Tampa, Florida and John F. Harkness, Jr., 
Executive Director, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida, 
 
 
for Petitioner 
 
 
 
- 5 - 
 
APPENDIX 
RULE 2.085. 
TIME STANDARDS FOR TRIAL AND APPELLATE 
COURTS 
(a) 
Purpose. Judges and lawyers have a professional obligation to 
conclude litigation as soon as it is reasonably and justly possible to do so. 
However, parties and counsel shall be afforded a reasonable time to prepare and 
present their case. 
(b) 
Case Control. The trial judge shall take charge of all cases at an early 
stage in the litigation and shall control the progress of the case thereafter until the 
case is determined. The trial judge shall take specific steps to monitor and control 
the pace of litigation, including the following: 
(1) 
assuming early and continuous control of the court calendar; 
(2) 
identifying priority cases as assigned by statute, rule of 
procedure, case law, or otherwise; 
(3) 
implementing such docket control policies as may be necessary 
to advance priority cases to ensure prompt resolution; 
(4) 
identifying cases subject to alternative dispute resolution 
processes; 
(5) 
developing rational and effective trial setting policies; and 
(6) 
advancing the trial setting of priority cases, older cases, and 
cases of greater urgency. 
(c) 
Priority Cases. 
(1) 
In all noncriminal cases assigned a priority status by statute, 
rule of procedure, case law, or otherwise, any party may file a notice of priority 
status explaining the nature of the case, the source of the priority status, any 
deadlines imposed by law on any aspect of the case, and any unusual factors that 
may bear on meeting the imposed deadlines. 
(2) 
If, in any noncriminal case assigned a priority status by statute, 
rule of procedure, case law, or otherwise, a party is of the good faith opinion that 
 
 
- 6 - 
the case has not been appropriately advanced on the docket or has not received 
priority in scheduling consistent with its priority case status, that party may seek 
review of such action by motion for review to the chief judge or to the chief 
judge’s designee. The filing of such a motion for review will not toll the time for 
seeking such other relief as may be afforded by the Florida Rules of Appellate 
Procedure. 
(d) 
Continuances. All judges shall apply a firm continuance policy. 
Continuances should be few, good cause should be required, and all requests 
should be heard and resolved by a judge. All motions for continuance shall be in 
writing unless made at a trial and, except for good cause shown, shall be signed by 
the party requesting the continuance. All motions for continuance in priority cases 
shall clearly identify such priority status and explain what effect the motion will 
have on the progress of the case. 
(e) 
Time Standards. The following time standards are hereby established 
as a presumptively reasonable time period for the completion of cases in the trial 
and appellate courts of this state. It is recognized that there are cases that, because 
of their complexity, present problems that cause reasonable delays. However, most 
cases should be completed within the following time periods: 
(1) 
Trial Court Time Standards. 
(A) 
Criminal. 
Felony — 180 days (arrest to final disposition) 
Misdemeanor — 90 days (arrest to final disposition) 
(B) 
Civil. 
Jury cases — 18 months (filing to final disposition) 
Non-jury cases — 12 months (filing to final disposition) 
Small claims — 95 days (filing to final disposition) 
(C) 
Domestic Relations. 
Uncontested — 90 days (filing to final disposition) 
Contested — 180 days (filing to final disposition) 
 
 
- 7 - 
(D) 
Probate. 
Uncontested, no federal estate tax return — 12 months (from 
issuance of letters of administration to final discharge) 
Uncontested, with federal estate tax return — 12 months (from 
the return’s due date to final discharge) 
Contested — 24 months (from filing to final discharge) 
(E) 
Juvenile Delinquency. 
AdjudicatoryDisposition hearing — 90120 days (filing of 
petition or child being taken into custody to hearing) 
AdjudicatoryDisposition hearing (child detained) — 2136 days 
(date of detention to hearing) 
(F) 
Juvenile Dependency. 
Disposition hearing (child sheltered) — 88 days (shelter 
hearing to disposition) 
Disposition hearing (child not sheltered) — 180120 days (filing 
of petition for dependency to hearing) 
(G) 
Permanency Proceedings. 
Permanency hearing — 12 months (date child is sheltered to 
hearing) 
(2) 
Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal Time 
Standards: Rendering a decision — within 180 days of either oral argument or the 
submission of the case to the court panel for a decision without oral argument 
(3) 
Florida Bar Referee Time Standards: Report of referee — 
within 180 days of being assigned to hear the case 
(4) 
Circuit Court Acting as Appellate Court: 
Ninety days from submission of the case to the judge for review 
(f) 
Reporting of Cases. The time standards require that the following 
monitoring procedures be implemented: 
 
 
- 8 - 
All pending cases in circuit and district courts of appeal exceeding the 
time standards shall be listed separately on a report submitted quarterly to the chief 
justice. The report shall include for each case listed the case number, type of case, 
case status (active or inactive for civil cases and contested or uncontested for 
domestic relations and probate cases), the date of arrest in criminal cases, and the 
original filing date in civil cases. The Office of the State Courts Administrator will 
provide the necessary forms for submission of this data. The report will be due on 
the 15th day of the month following the last day of the quarter.