Case Title: State Of Florida v. Peyton Honeycutt

Citation: 

Docket Number: SC02-69

State: florida

Court: Florida Supreme Court

Date: 2005-05-05T00:00:00Z

Document:
Supreme Court of Florida 
 
 
____________ 
 
No. SC02-69 
____________ 
 
STATE OF FLORIDA,  
Petitioner, 
 
vs. 
 
PEYTON HONEYCUTT,  
Respondent. 
 
[May 5, 2005] 
 
PER CURIAM. 
 
We have for review the decision in Honeycutt v. State, 805 So. 2d 987 (Fla. 
4th DCA 2001), which certified conflict with the decisions in Coppola v. State, 
795 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), and Regan v. State, 787 So. 2d 265 (Fla. 1st 
DCA 2001).  We accept jurisdiction, see art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const., summarily 
quash the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal, and remand for 
reconsideration in light of our decision in Banks v. State, 887 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 
2004).  
PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and 
BELL, JJ., concur. 
 
 
 
- 2 -
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND 
IF FILED, DETERMINED. 
 
 
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Certified 
Direct Conflict of Decisions 
 
 
Fourth District - Case No. 4D01-2559 
 
 
(Palm Beach County) 
 
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida and James J. Carney, 
Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, Florida, 
 
 
for Petitioner 
 
Peyton Honeycutt, pro se, Bothell, Washington, 
 
 
for Respondent