Case Title: State v. Keck

Citation: 112 Haw. 88

Docket Number: 

State: hawaii

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court

Date: 2006-10-04T00:00:00Z

Document:
LAW UBRARY

No. 27311

ZN THE SUFREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAT'Ip| 8

Ea
STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent /Plaintiff-Appellgg) =}
vs &

PAUL A. KECK, Fetitioner/Defendant-Appellanés| py

  

 

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CR. NO. 04-1-1525)

RDI wi -RTTORART
(By: Levinson, J., for the majority:
with Acoba, J., Concurring Separately
and Dissenting, With Whom Duffy, J., Joins)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Paul A. Keck’s
application for writ of certiorari, filed on September 14, 2006,
is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, October 4, 2006.

 
 
 

Earle A. Partington FOR THE MAJORITY: (F*®%
for petiioner/ & »
defendant-appeliant : eee ®
on the application BteeHietee — | SEAL,
STEVEN H. Levinson \ Sy,

Associate Justice

 

De
Sor SY
COMCURRENCE AND DISSENT BY ACOBA. J.
‘INWHICH DUFFY, Ji, JOINS
1 concur in part, but 1 dissent as to the extended term
sentences issue, As to that iamve, I would grant certiorari.

See State v. White, 110 Hawai'i 79, 91, 129 P.3d 1107, 1119

 

\ Considered by: Moon, C.J., Levinson and Nakayama, 29. with Acoba,
Joy concurring separately and Gissenting, with whom Ouffy, J.» Joins,

 
(2006) (Acoba, J., dissenting, joined by Duffy, J.) (Because
“(t]he Winth Circuit’s . . . decision [in Kaua vw. Frank, 436 F.3d
1057 (9th Cir, 2006)] has in large part undercut the .

Mintrineic-extrinsic fact’ distinction (in State v. Rivera, 106

 

Hawai'i 146, 102 P.3d 1044 (2004), cert, denied, --- U.S. ~
(2005),] and the two-step sentencing process{,] . . . the
availability of federal habeas proceedings and the resulting
impact on the parties and both state and federal courts makes @
reexamination of our extended-term sentencing decisions even more

Amperative.")