Case Title: Disciplinary Counsel v. Rumizen

Citation: 2020-Ohio-444

Docket Number: 

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2020-02-11T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Rumizen, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2020-Ohio-444.] 
 
 
 
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. RUMIZEN. 
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Rumizen, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2020-Ohio-444.] 
(No. 2019-0217—Submitted February 7, 2020—Decided February 11, 2020.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
____________________ 
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 
application for reinstatement by respondent, Scott Andrew Rumizen, Attorney 
Registration No. 0058561, last known business address in Beachwood, Ohio. 
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of June 27, 2019, wherein 
the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the 
practice of law for a period of two years, with eighteen months stayed on 
conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and 
with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). 
{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to 
the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 
of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be 
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2). 
{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Rumizen, 156 Ohio St.3d 
575, 2019-Ohio-2519, 130 N.E.3d 283. 
O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FRENCH, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, 
and STEWART, JJ., concur. 
________________________