Case Title: David M. Pomerance v. Homosassa Special Water District

Citation: 

Docket Number: SC00-912

State: florida

Court: Florida Supreme Court

Date: 2001-04-12T00:00:00Z

Document:
Supreme Court of Florida
 
____________
No. SC00-912
____________
DAVID M. POMERANCE, et al.,
Petitioners,
vs.
HOMOSASSA SPECIAL WATER DISTRICT, etc.,
Respondent.
[April 12 2001]
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review of the decision of the district court of appeal in 
Pomerance v. Homosassa Special Water District, 755 So. 2d 732 (Fla. 5th DCA
2000), based on express and direct conflict with the decision in Lake County v.
Water Oak Management Corp., 695 So. 2d 667 (Fla. 1997).  Upon further
consideration, we find that review was improvidently granted.  Accordingly, this
review proceeding is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
-2-
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and
QUINCE, JJ., concur.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - 
Direct Conflict
Fifth District - Case No. 5D98-2504 
(Citrus County)
Karen O. Gaffney, Inverness, Florida,
for Petitioners
Jack A. Moring of Myers and Moring, P.A., Crystal River, Florida; and Sidney F.
Ansbacher of Upchurch, Bailey & Upchurch, P.A., St. Augustine, Florida,
for Respondent
Frank A. Shepherd, Miami, Florida,
for Pacific Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae