Case Title: Stenta v. General Motors, et al.

Citation: 

Docket Number: 354, 2010

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2010-10-18T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
HENRY A. STENTA,  
 
Plaintiff Below- 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
GENERAL MOTORS 
CORPORATION, a corporation of 
the State of Delaware, and 
DELAWARE MOTOR SALES, 
INC. t/a DELAWARE CADILLAC, 
a corporation of the State of 
Delaware, 
 
Defendants Below- 
Appellees. 
§ 
§  No. 354, 2009 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below─Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§  C.A. No. 05C-03-328 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
     Submitted:  October 13, 2010 
 
 
 
 
        Decided:  October 18, 2010 
 
Before HOLLAND, BERGER and RIDGELY, Justices. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
O R D E R  
 
This 18th day of October 2010, the Court having considered this 
matter after oral argument and on the briefs filed by the parties has 
determined that, with regard to the issues raised by the appellant, the final 
judgments of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for 
the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its decision dated May 29, 
2009.  There is no need for this Court to address the issues raised in the 
cross-appeal because the appellee’s answering brief states:  “In the event this  
Court affirms the trial court’s ruling granting summary judgment in 
defendants’ favor on both issues appealed by plaintiffs, defendants expressly 
represent to this Court that they withdraw their cross appeal.” 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgments 
of the Superior Court be, and the same hereby are, AFFIRMED. 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Randy J. Holland 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice