Case Title: Bradley v HWA 1290 III LLC

Citation: 2018 NY Slip Op 06853

Docket Number: 

State: new-york

Court: New York Appellate Court

Date: 2018-10-16T00:00:00Z

Document:
Bradley v HWA 1290 III LLC

2018 NY Slip Op 06853

Decided on October 16, 2018

Court of Appeals

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 16, 2018

No. 144 SSM 19

[*1]Marie Bradley, & c., et al., Appellants,
vHWA 1290 III LLC, et al., Respondents.


Submitted by Brian J. Isaac, for appellants.
Submitted by Richard J. Sabatini, for respondents.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs. To the extent that a violation of standards of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) constitutes evidence of negligence (see Sawyer v Dreis & Krump Mfg. Co. , 67 NY2d 328 [1986]; Trimarco v Klein , 56 NY2d 98 [1982]), plaintiffs' reliance on those standards was proper. However, plaintiffs nevertheless failed to raise a triable question of fact as to whether defendants had either actual or constructive notice of the alleged dangerous condition. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Wilson and Feinman concur. Judge Garcia took no part.
Decided October 16, 2018