Case Title: Susan Dial v. State of Florida

Citation: 

Docket Number: SC95-507

State: florida

Court: Florida Supreme Court

Date: 1999-12-16T00:00:00Z

Document:
Supreme Court of Florida
 
____________
No. 95,507
____________
SUSAN DIAL, et al.
Petitioners,
vs.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
[December 16, 1999]
PARIENTE, J.
We have for review Dial v. State, 730 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999),
which expressly and directly conflicts with the opinions in State v. Holland, 689 So.
2d 1268 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), and State v. Perry, 716 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 2d DCA
1998).  We have jurisdiction.  See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.  For reasons
expressed in our opinion in Hayes v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly S467 (Fla. Oct. 7,
1999), the decision of the Fourth District is hereby quashed.  We remand to the
district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
-2-
It is so ordered.
HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ.,
concur.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND IF
FILED, DETERMINED.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - 
Direct Conflict
Fourth District - Case No. 98-2803 
(Indian River County)
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Assistant Public Defender,
Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, Florida,
for Petitioner
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Celia Terenzio, Bureau Chief, West Palm
Beach, and Leslie T. Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, Florida,
for Respondent