Case Title: Disciplinary Counsel v. Karris

Citation: 2012-Ohio-1140

Docket Number: 

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2012-03-19T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Karris, 131 Ohio St.3d 1223, 2012-Ohio-1140.] 
 
 
 
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. KARRIS. 
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Karris, 131 Ohio St.3d 1223, 2012-Ohio-1140.] 
(No. 2010-1898—Submitted March 15, 2012—Decided March 19, 2012.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
__________________ 
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 
application for reinstatement by respondent, Tom John Karris, Attorney 
Registration No. 0033659, last known business address in Strongsville, Ohio. 
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of September 1, 2011, 
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a 
period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that 
order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). 
{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to 
the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 
of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made 
as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of 
publication. 
{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Karris, 129 Ohio St.3d 
499, 2011-Ohio-4243, 954 N.E.2d 118. 
O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, 
LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. 
______________________