Case Title: State v. Castaneda (*Opinion has been modified per order filed December 22, 2010; please see pdf at top of opinion for specifics.*)

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: nevada

Court: Nevada Supreme Court

Date: 2010-11-24T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

"THE STATE OF NEVADA, | vo. FILED
Appellant,

MARTY EDWARD CASTANEDA, EC 2 2 za
Respondent, Settee

    
   
  
 
 
 
   
   
 

 

 

ORDER DENYING RE} ING AND MODIFYING OPINION

Respondent has filed a petition for rehearing. Having
lconsidered the petition, we conclude that rehearing is not warranted.
INRAP 40).

However, based on the petition for rehearing, we have
Jdetermined that a sentence in the opinion requires modification. We
direct the clerk of this court to modify the opinion filed on November 24,
}2010, by replacing the fourth sentence of the opinion with the following
"He entered a plea of not guilty and also asserted a constitutional

challenge to the statute, arguing that it is facially vague and overbroad

 

1o-33412._ |
and cannot be enforced, even if the State were to prove the conduct
charged at trial.”
It is eo ORDERED.

Ca.

Parraguirre

 

Hon. James M, Bixler, District Judge
Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney
Clark County Public Defender
Eighth District Court Clerk