Case Title: Snyder v. Johnstown-Monroe Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

Citation: 1994-Ohio-20

Docket Number: 19931218

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 1994-05-11T00:00:00Z

Document:
OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO                               
     The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of                      
Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27,                      
1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice                   
Thomas J. Moyer.                                                                 
     Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's                   
Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio.  Attention:  Walter S.                      
Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative                         
Assistant.  Tel.:  (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010.                       
Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome.                            
     NOTE:  Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the                  
full texts of the opinions after they have been released                         
electronically to the public.  The reader is therefore advised                   
to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West                       
Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions.                     
The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume                    
and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound                   
volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.                                            
                                                                                 
Snyder, Appellee, v. Board of Education of the Johnstown-Monroe                  
Local School District, Appellant.                                                
[Cite as Snyder v. Johnstown-Monroe Local School Dist. Bd. of                    
Edn. (1994),     Ohio St. 3d    .]                                               
Schools -- Teachers -- Nonrenewal of limited teaching contract                   
     -- Procedural provisions of R.C. Chapter 2506 provide                       
     procedure that must be followed in an appeal pursuant to                    
     R.C. 3319.11.                                                               
     (No. 93-1218 -- April 6, 1994 -- Decided May 11, 1994.)                     
     Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Licking County, No.                    
92-CA-92.                                                                        
                                                                                 
     Martin, Pergram, Browning & Parker Co., L.P.A., and Dennis                  
L. Pergram, for appellee.                                                        
     Robert L. Becker, Licking County Prosecuting Attorney, and                  
David Q. Wigginton, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for                          
appellant.                                                                       
                                                                                 
     The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on                         
authority of Kiel v. Green Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.                        
(1994),     Ohio St.3d    ,     N.E.2d    , paragraph one of                     
the syllabus, and also for the reasons stated in the opinion of                  
the court of appeals.                                                            
     This cause is remanded to the trial court to apply the law                  
as set forth in Kiel.                                                            
     A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer,                   
JJ., concur.                                                                     
     Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J. concurs in part and dissent in                  
part.                                                                            
     Wright, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.                      
I concur in the result obtained in this cause.  I continue to                    
disagree with the reasoning stated in Kiel v. Green Local                        
School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 149,                              
N.E.2d    , for the reasons stated in my dissent therein.                        
     Moyer, C.J., concurs in the foregoing opinion.