Case Title: Logue v. State

Citation: 

Docket Number: 367, 2023

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2023-11-28T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
BRANDON LOGUE, 
 
Defendant Below, 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
STATE OF DELAWARE, 
 
Appellee. 
§ 
§   
§  No. 367, 2023 
§ 
§  Court Below: Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware 
§   
§  Cr. ID No. 2201000054 (N) 
§   
§ 
 
Submitted: November 21, 2023 
Decided: 
November 28, 2023 
 
 
ORDER 
 
(1) 
On October 2, 2023, the appellant filed a document indicating that he 
wanted to appeal from a Superior Court violation of probation sentence order dated 
September 7, 2023.  The Senior Court Clerk sent the appellant letters directing him 
to complete and sign an official Form A notice of appeal by October 18, 2023, and 
to pay the filing fee or to file a motion and affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis by 
the same date.  On October 19, 2023, the Chief Deputy Clerk sent another letter 
directing the appellant to either file a motion and affidavit to proceed in forma 
pauperis or pay the filing fee by November 2, 2023, or a notice to show cause would 
issue. 
(2) 
On November 6, 2023, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice, by 
certified mail, directing the appellant to show cause why the Court should not 
 
2 
dismiss the appeal for the appellant’s failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by 
either paying the Supreme Court filing fee or filing a motion to proceed in forma 
pauperis.  The notice to show cause directed the appellant to respond within ten days 
and advised that if the appellant did not respond, dismissal of the appeal would be 
deemed to be unopposed.  On November 13, 2023, the Court received the certified-
mail receipt indicating that the notice had been delivered on November 8, 2023.   
(3) 
The appellant having failed to respond to the notice to show cause 
within the required ten-day period, dismissal of this action is deemed to be 
unopposed. 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b) 
and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED. 
BY THE COURT: 
/s/ Gary F. Traynor 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice