Case Title: Murray v. Univ. of N.C. at Chapel Hill

Citation: 

Docket Number: 124A16

State: north-carolina

Court: North Carolina Supreme Court

Date: 2017-06-09T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 
No. 124A16  
Filed 9 June 2017 
JILLIAN MURRAY 
 
 
v. 
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL 
 
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of 
the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 782 S.E.2d 531 (2016), dismissing an appeal 
from an order entered on 6 November 2014 by Judge Carl R. Fox in Superior Court, 
Orange County, and remanding the case for further proceedings.  On 9 June 2016, 
the Supreme Court allowed defendant’s petition for discretionary review as to an 
additional issue.  Heard in the Supreme Court on 21 March 2017. 
 
Law Firm of Henry Clay Turner, PLLC, by Henry Clay Turner, for plaintiff-
appellee. 
Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Elizabeth A. Fisher, Assistant Solicitor 
General, and Laura Howard McHenry, Assistant Attorney General, for 
defendant-appellant. 
 
PER CURIAM. 
As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the 
majority decision of the Court of Appeals.  We conclude that the petition for 
discretionary review as to the additional issue was improvidently allowed.  
AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.