Case Title: State v. Kelly James Kloss

Citation: 

Docket Number: 2018AP000651-CR

State: wisconsin

Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court

Date: 2020-03-06T00:00:00Z

Document:
2020 WI 26 
 
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 
 
 
 
 
 
CASE NO.: 
2018AP651-CR 
 
 
 
COMPLETE TITLE: 
State of Wisconsin, 
          Plaintiff-Respondent-Cross Petitioner, 
     v. 
Kelly James Kloss, 
          Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. 
 
 
 
 
 
REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS 
Reported at 386 Wis. 2d 314,925 N.W.2d 563 
PDC No:2019 WI App 13 - Published 
 
 
OPINION FILED: 
March 6, 2020   
SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS: 
        
ORAL ARGUMENT: 
October 14, 2019   
 
 
SOURCE OF APPEAL: 
 
 
COURT: 
Circuit   
 
COUNTY: 
St. Croix   
 
JUDGE: 
Eugene D. Harrington   
 
 
 
JUSTICES: 
 
PER CURIAM. 
 
REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY and DANIEL KELLY, JJ., dissent. 
NOT PARTICIPATING: 
        
 
 
 
ATTORNEYS: 
 
For the plaintiff-respondent-cross petitioner, there were 
briefs filed by Lisa E.F. Kumfer, assistant attorney general, with 
whom on the brief was Joshua L. Kaul, attorney general. There was 
an oral argument by Lisa E.F. Kumfer. 
 
For the defendant-appellant-petitioner, there were briefs 
filed by Steven L. Miller and Miller Appellate Practice, LLC, River 
Falls. There was an oral argument by Steven L. Miller.  
2020 WI 26 
 
NOTICE 
This opinion is subject to further 
editing and modification.  The final 
version will appear in the bound 
volume of the official reports. 
No.   2018AP651-CR 
(L.C. No. 
2014CF465) 
STATE OF WISCONSIN  
 
 
   : 
IN SUPREME COURT 
 
 
State of Wisconsin, 
 
          Plaintiff-Respondent-Cross   
          Petitioner, 
 
     v. 
 
Kelly James Kloss, 
 
          Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. 
 
 
 
FILED 
 
MAR 6, 2020 
 
Sheila T. Reiff 
Clerk of Supreme Court 
 
 
 
 
 
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals.  Dismissed as 
improvidently granted. 
 
¶1 
PER CURIAM.   Kelly Kloss and the State cross-petitioned 
for review of the decision of the court of appeals, State v. Kloss, 
2019 WI App 13, 386 Wis. 2d 314, 925 N.W.2d 563.  After reviewing 
the record and the briefs of both parties, and after hearing oral 
arguments, we conclude this matter should be dismissed as 
improvidently granted. 
No. 
2018AP651-CR 
 
2 
 
¶2 
By the Court.—The review of the decision of the court of 
appeals is dismissed as improvidently granted. 
¶3 
REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY and DANIEL KELLY, JJ., dissent. 
 
No. 
2018AP651-CR 
 
 
 
1