Case Title: Douglas Isom v. State of Florida

Citation: 

Docket Number: SC00-724

State: florida

Court: Florida Supreme Court

Date: 2001-07-12T00:00:00Z

Document:
Supreme 
Court 
of 
Florida
 
____________
No. SC00-724
____________
DOUGLAS ISOM,
Petitioner,
vs.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
[July 12, 2001]
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review in Isom v. State, 750 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 3d DCA
2000), based on an alleged express and direct conflict with the First District’s
decision in Daniels v. State, 593 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).  Upon closer
examination, however, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted in this
case.  Therefore, we dismiss review of this cause.
It is so ordered.  
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and
QUINCE, JJ., concur.
-2-
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - 
Direct Conflict
Third District - Case No. 3D97-2430 
(Dade County)
Mary E. Adkins, Melrose, Florida,
for Petitioner
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Michael J. Neimand, Senior Assistant
Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Assistant Attorney General, Fort
Lauderdale, Florida,
for Respondent