Case Title: Davis v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Citation: 2001-Ohio-173

Docket Number: 20001998

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2001-07-05T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as Davis v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co, 92 Ohio St.3d 212, 2001-Ohio-
173.] 
1 
 
 
DAVIS ET AL., APPELLEES, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE 
COMPANY, APPELLANT. 
[Cite as Davis v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 212.] 
Insurance — Motor vehicles — Mandatory offering of uninsured and 
underinsured motorist coverage — Amount available for payment for 
purpose of setoff — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. 
(No. 00-1998 — Submitted May 16, 2001 — Decided July 5, 2001.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-194. 
__________________ 
 
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the 
opinion of the court of appeals. 
 
DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. 
 
MOYER, C.J., COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. 
__________________ 
 
COOK, J., dissenting.  I respectfully dissent based on the reasoning set 
forth in my dissenting opinion in Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 
425, 746 N.Ed.2d 1077, and in my opinion concurring in part and dissenting in 
part in Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719. 
 
MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., concur in the foregoing 
dissenting opinion. 
__________________ 
 
Clark, Perdue, Roberts & Scott Co., L.P.A., Glen R. Pritchard and 
Douglas S. Roberts, for appellees. 
 
Gallagher, Gams, Pryor, Tallan & Littrell L.L.P., James R. Gallagher and 
Amy Mass, for appellant. 
__________________