Case Title: In re United Public Workers, AFSCME, Local 646, AFL-CIO

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: hawaii

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court

Date: 2007-03-29T00:00:00Z

Document:
“** NOT FOR PUBLICATION ***
no, 27962

3

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'Y 2
eee

 

© 0. 05-1-1388,
In the Matter of UNITED PUBLIC WORKERS, AFSCME, Local 646,
AFL-C10, Complainant-Appellant, Cross-Appeliee

and

LARRY J. LEOPARDI, Chief Engineer, Acting Director, Facility
Maintenance, City and County of Honolulu; CHERYL OKUMA-SEPE,
Director, Department of human Resources, City and County of

Honolulu; and JEREMY HARRIS, Mayor, City and County of Honolulu,
THOMAS LENCHANKO, District Road Superintendent, Department of

Facility Maintenance, City and County of Honolulu; and CYNTHIA

JOHANSON, Department Coordinator, Department of Facility
Maintenance, City and County of Honolulu (2005-124),
Respondent s-Appellees, Cross-Appellants,

and

HAWAIT LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, BRIAN K. NAKAMURA,
‘SPRINGER and KATHLEEN RACUYA-MARKRICH,
Agency-Appellees, Cross-Appellees.

EMORY J.

 

SIVIL No. 05-1-1391,
In the Matter of UNITED PUBLIC WORKERS, AFSCME, Local 646,
AFL-CIO, Complainant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee

  

and

LAVERNE HIGA, Chief Engineer, Acting Director, Facility
Maintenance, City and County of Honolulu; KENNETH NAKAMATSU,
Director, Department of Hunan Resources, City and County of

Honolulu; and MUF1 HANNEMANN, Mayor, City and County of Honolulu;
THOMAS LENCHANKO, District Road Superintendent, Department of

Facility Maintenance, City and County of Honolulus and CYNTHIA
JOHANSON, Department Coordinator, Department of Facility
Maintenance, City and County of Honolulu,
Respondents-Appellees, Cross-Appellants,

 

and

ase
*** NOT FOR PUBLICATION ***

HAWAII LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, STATE OF HAWAII,
Agency-Appellee, Cross-Appellee

 

APPEALS FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT
(CIV. NOS, 05-1-1388 and 05-1-1391)

ORDER DISMISSING “yoTTc! 0 THE SUPREM! 7m
Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.)

 

Upon review of the “notice of appeal to the suprene
court” filed on March 9, 2007 by United Public Workers, AFSCHE,

 

cal 646, AFL-CIO (UPW), it appears that UPW purports to appeal
to the supreme court from a March 7, 2007 order of the
Intermediate Court of Appeals granting @ stay pending appeal
Pursuant to HRAP 8. UPW purports to appeal pursuant to HRS $$
380-10 (1993) and 602-5 (1993), but those statutes, as amended in
2004, do not authorize a
March 7, 2007 order of the Intermediate Court of Appeals. See
RRS $§ 380-10 (Supp. 2006) and 602-5 (Supp. 2006), Therefore,
IT 18 HEREBY ORDERED that UPW's March 9, 2007 “notice

 

appeal to the supreme court of the

of appeal to the supreme court” is dismissed.
DATED: Honolulu, Haws

 

“4, Maren 29, 2007,