Case Title: Evans v. State

Citation: 

Docket Number: 3m/05

State: maryland

Court: Maryland Supreme Court

Date: 2006-02-06T00:00:00Z

Document:
*PLEASE NOTE: There are five orders attached.
VERNON EVANS, JR.
*
In the
   
*
Court of Appeals
     
   v.    
*
of Maryland
     
*
Misc. No. 3
 
STATE OF MARYLAND
*
September Term, 2005
  O R D E R
The Court having considered the motion to stay warrant of
execution pending resolution of a petition for certiorari filed
in the Supreme Court of the United States, and the State’s
opposition thereto in the above-captioned case, it is this 6th
day of February, 2006,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of
the Court concurring, that the motion to stay warrant of
execution be, and it is hereby, denied as moot. 
/s/ Robert M. Bell            
      Chief Judge
Judge Cathell did not participate in the consideration of this
matter.
VERNON EVANS, JR.
*
In the
   
*
Court of Appeals
     
   v.    
*
of Maryland
     
*
Misc. No. 19
 
STATE OF MARYLAND
*
September Term, 2005
  O R D E R
The Court having considered Vernon Evans’s application for
leave to appeal, the State’s answer opposing the application,
Evans’s reply to the State’s answer, the motion to stay warrant
of execution and the opposition filed thereto in the above-
entitled case, it is this 6th day of February, 2006,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of
the Court concurring, that said application be, and it is hereby,
granted and the case shall be transferred to the regular docket
as No. 123, September Term, 2005, and it is further
ORDERED that the motion for stay of warrant of execution is 
GRANTED, and the execution of Vernon Evans is stayed pending 
final disposition of this case on appeal, and it is further
ORDERED that counsel for each side shall file one
consolidated brief covering all four cases on appeal (Nos. 107,
122, 123, and 124, September Term, 2005) not to exceed seventy-
five (75) pages in length and printed record extract in
accordance with Md. Rules 8-501 and 8-502, appellant’s brief and
record extract to be filed on or before March 3, 2006; appellee’s
brief to be filed on or before April 3, 2006; and it is further
ORDERED, that this case shall be set for argument during the
May Session of Court.
/s/ Robert M. Bell            
       Chief Judge
Judge Cathell did not participate in the consideration of this
matter.
VERNON EVANS, JR.
*
In the
   
*
Court of Appeals
     
   v.    
*
of Maryland
     
*
Misc. No. 22
 
STATE OF MARYLAND
*
September Term, 2005
  O R D E R
The Court having considered the application for leave to
appeal, the motion to stay warrant of execution and the responses
filed thereto in the above-captioned case, it is this 6th  day of
February, 2006,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of
the Court concurring, that said application be, and it is hereby,
granted and the case shall be transferred to the regular docket
as No. 124, September Term, 2005, and it is further
ORDERED that the motion to stay warrant of execution be, and
it is hereby, GRANTED, and the execution of Vernon Evans is
stayed pending final disposition of this case on appeal, and it
is further
ORDERED that counsel for each side shall file one
consolidated brief covering all four cases on appeal (Nos. 107,
122, 123, and 124, September Term, 2005) not to exceed seventy-
five (75) pages in length and printed record extract in
accordance with Md. Rules 8-501 and 8-502, appellant’s brief and
record extract to be filed on or before March 3, 2006; appellee’s
brief to be filed on or before April 3, 2006; and it is further
ORDERED, that this case shall be set for argument during the
May Session of Court.
/s/ Robert M. Bell            
       Chief Judge
Judge Cathell did not participate in the consideration of this
matter.
VERNON EVANS, JR., et al.
*
In the
   
*
Court of Appeals
     
   v.    
*
of Maryland
     
*
No. 122
 
MARY ANN SAAR, SECRETARY, et al.*
September Term, 2005
  O R D E R
The Court having considered the motion for injunction
pending appeal, the appellants’ memoranda in support of the
motion and the response filed thereto in the above-entitled case,
it is this 6th day of February, 2006,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of
the Court concurring, that the motion for injunction pending
appeal be, and it is hereby, GRANTED, and the execution of Vernon
Evans is enjoined pending final disposition of this case on
appeal, and it is further 
ORDERED that counsel for each side shall file one
consolidated brief covering all four cases on appeal (Nos. 107,
122, 123, and 124, September Term, 2005) not to exceed seventy-
five (75) pages in length and printed record extract in
accordance with Md. Rules 8-501 and 8-502, appellants’ brief and
record extract to be filed on or before March 3, 2006; appellees’
brief to be filed on or before April 3, 2006; and it is further
ORDERED, that this case shall be set for argument during the
May Session of Court.
/s/ Robert M. Bell            
     Chief Judge
Judge Cathell did not participate in the consideration of this
matter.
VERNON EVANS, JR.
*
In the
   
*
Court of Appeals
     
   v.    
*
of Maryland
     
*
No. 107
 
STATE OF MARYLAND
*
September Term, 2005
  O R D E R
The Court having considered Vernon Evans’s motion to stay 
warrant of execution, the State’s motion to summarily affirm the
circuit court’s denial of Evans’s motion to correct illegal
sentence and to deny the request for stay and the answers filed
thereto in response to a show cause order issued by the Court in
the above-entitled case, it is this 6th day of February, 2006,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of
the Court concurring, that the motion for stay of warrant of
execution be, and it is hereby, GRANTED, and the execution of
Vernon Evans is stayed pending final disposition of this case on
appeal, and it is further
 
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of
the Court concurring, that the motion to summarily affirm the
circuit court’s denial of Evans’s motion to correct illegal
sentence be, and it is hereby, denied, and it is further
ORDERED that counsel for each side shall file one
consolidated brief covering all four cases on appeal (Nos. 107,
122, 123, and 124, September Term, 2005) not to exceed seventy-
five (75) pages in length and printed record extract in
accordance with Md. Rules 8-501 and 8-502, appellant’s brief and
record extract to be filed on or before March 3, 2006; appellee’s
brief to be filed on or before April 3, 2006; and it is further
ORDERED, that this case shall be set for argument during the
May Session of Court.
/s/ Robert M. Bell            
     Chief Judge
Judge Cathell did not participate in the consideration of this
matter.