Case Title: Thomas Kirkendall v. State of Florida

Citation: 

Docket Number: SC00-351

State: florida

Court: Florida Supreme Court

Date: 2001-05-17T00:00:00Z

Document:
Supreme Court of Florida
 
____________
No. SC00-351
____________
THOMAS KIRKENDALL,
Petitioner,
vs.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
[May 17, 2001]
LEWIS, J.
We have for review Kirkendall v. State, 749 So. 2d 571 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). 
We have jurisdiction.  See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
We vacate the decision of the district court and remand for reconsideration
upon application of our decisions in Grant v. State, 770 So. 2d 655 (Fla. 2000);
State v. Cotton, 769 So. 2d 345 (Fla. 2000); McKnight v. State, 769 So. 2d 1039
(Fla. 2000); and Ellis v. State, 762 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 2000).
It is so ordered.
-2-
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.
QUINCE, J., dissents.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND
IF FILED, DETERMINED.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - 
Statutory Validity
Second District - Case No. 2D99-227 
(Pinellas County)
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public
Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, Florida,
for Petitioner
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant
Attorney General, Chief of Criminal Law, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant
Attorney General, Tampa, Florida,
for Respondent