Case Title: Steiner v. Ganley Toyota-Mercedes Benz

Citation: 2003-Ohio-3139

Docket Number: 20021216

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2003-07-02T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as Steiner v. Ganley Toyota-Mercedes Benz, 99 Ohio St.3d 211, 2003-Ohio-3139.] 
1 
 
 
STEINER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. GANLEY TOYOTA-MERCEDES BENZ ET AL., 
APPELLEES. 
[Cite as Steiner v. Ganley Toyota-Mercedes Benz, 99 Ohio St.3d 211, 2003-
Ohio-3139.] 
Torts — Negligence — Open-and-obvious doctrine remains viable in Ohio — 
Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of Armstrong v. Best 
Buy Co., Inc. 
(No.  2002-1216 — Submitted June 4, 2003 — Decided July 2, 2003.) 
CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 20767, 2002-Ohio-
2326. 
__________________ 
{¶1} 
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority 
of Armstrong v. Best Buy Co., Inc., 99 Ohio St.3d 79, 2003-Ohio-2573, 788 
N.E.2d 1088. 
 
MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, LUNDBERG STRATTON and 
O’CONNOR, JJ., concur. 
 
PFEIFER, J., dissents. 
 
O’DONNELL, J., not participating. 
__________________ 
 
Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, L.L.P., and David P. Bertsch, for 
appellants. 
__________________