Case Title: Rodriguez v. Pinero

Citation: 

Docket Number: 136, 2001

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2001-07-26T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
CARMELO RODRIGUEZ,
Petitioner Below,
Appellant,
v.
MICHELLE S. PINERO,
Respondent Below,
Appellee.
§
§
§  No. 136, 2001
§
§  Court Below:  Family Court
§  of the State of Delaware,
§  in and for New Castle County
§
§  File No. CN94-10226
§  Petition No. 00-33497
§
O R D E R
This 26th day of July 2001, it appears to the Court that:
1.
On June 8, 2001, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this
appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the
appellant's failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by failing to pay to Family
Court the required record transmittal fee.
2.
The notice to show cause was sent by Certified Mail, Return
Receipt Requested, to the appellant at the address he provided to this Court.  On
July 9, 2001, the notice to show cause was returned to the Clerk’s office by the
post office marked “Return to Sender (Other).”  On that date, the notice was re-
sent to the appellant by regular mail.  To date, there has been no response.
2
3.  The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within
the required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be
unopposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme
Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Carolyn Berger
Justice