Case Title: State v. Larkin

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: hawaii

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court

Date: 2005-04-20T00:00:00Z

Document:
‘*** NOT FOR PUBLICATION ***
No. 27036

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAT'T

 

STATE OF HAWAI'L, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appegiee

vs. Fe

 

oss

APPEND Foy Tae Fanst cxncurr count SBE
(eh 55. ons 9058)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

(By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.)

g
2
z
e
8

Upon review of the record, it appears that judgment has
not been entered in Cr. No. 01-1-1825. The appeal by defendant
shaun Larkin from the December 20, 2004 order denying the motion
to dismiss indictment as to Counts I, IT and III is an appeal of
an interlocutory order. The December 20, 2004 order was not
certified for appeal pursuant to HRS § 641-17 and is not
immediately appealable by defendant Larkin as an appellant or a
cross-appellant. See HRS § 641-11; Grattafiori v, State, 79
Hawai'i10, 13, 897 P.2d 937, 940 (1995) ("The right of appeal in
a criminal case is purely statutory and exists only when given by
MRAP 4.2(a) (3)

 

some constitutional or statutory provision.”)
("the defendant may file a cross-appeal . . . if the appeal is
otherwise allowed by law."). ‘Thus, we lack jurisdiction as to

defendant Larkin’s appeal. Therefore,
*** NOT FOR PUBLICATION ***
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal by defendant Shaun
Larkin is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, April 20, 2005.

ro

MieFip Lene

en

Gane recags th