Case Title: Big Creek Lumber v. Cty. of Santa Cruz

Citation: 

Docket Number: S123659M

State: california

Court: California Supreme Court

Date: 2006-08-30T00:00:00Z

Document:
Filed 8/30/06 
 
 
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
 
 
BIG CREEK LUMBER CO. et al., 
) 
 
 
) 
 
Plaintiffs and Appellants, 
) 
 
 
) 
S123659 
 
v. 
) 
 
 
) 
Ct. App. 6 H023778 
COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ et al., 
) 
 
) 
Santa Cruz County Super. Ct. 
 
Defendants and Appellants. 
) 
Nos. CV134816 & CV137992 
___________________________________ ) 
MODIFICATION OF OPINION 
THE COURT: 
The opinion herein, filed on June 29, 2006, appearing at 38 Cal.4th 1139, is 
modified as follows: 
The first sentence of the first paragraph on page 1148 is revised to read:  
“The TPA, as amended in 1982 (Stats. 1982, ch. 1489, §§ 1-39, pp. 5748-5766) 
reflects state policy, inter alia, ‘That timber operations conducted in a manner 
consistent with forest practice rules adopted by the [Board] shall not be or become 
restricted or prohibited due to any land use in or around the locality of those 
operations.’  (Gov. Code, 51102, subd. (b)).)” 
The first sentence and subsequent citation of the third paragraph on page 
1154 are revised to read:  “Of greater import is that section 4516.5(d) was added to 
the FPA during the same legislative session in which the TPA was amended.  (See 
Stats. 1982, ch. 1561, § 3, p. 6164 [adding § 4516.5] and id. ch. 1489, pp. 5748-
5766.)”  
The modifications do not affect the judgment.