Case Title: State v. Petty

Citation: 2009-Ohio-1906

Docket Number: 20090132

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2009-04-29T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as State v. Petty, 121 Ohio St.3d 607, 2009-Ohio-1906.] 
 
 
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. PETTY, APPELLANT. 
[Cite as State v. Petty, 121 Ohio St.3d 607, 2009-Ohio-1906.] 
Discretionary appeal accepted, judgment of the court of appeals reversed in part, 
and cause remanded to the trial court for resentencing consistent with 
State v. Bezak. 
(No. 2009-0132 — Submitted March 24, 2009 — Decided April 29, 2009.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Richland County,  
No. 2007CA00050, 2008-Ohio-5962. 
__________________ 
{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I. 
{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed as to its ruling on 
appellant's eleventh assignment of error below, and the cause is remanded to the 
trial court for resentencing consistent with State v. Bezak, 114 Ohio St.3d 94, 
2007-Ohio-3250, 868 N.E.2d 961. 
 
MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, and 
CUPP, JJ., concur. 
 
PFEIFER and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent and would not accept the appeal. 
__________________ 
 
James J. Mayer Jr., Richland County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kirsten 
Pscholka-Gartner, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. 
 
Shaw & Miller and Mark J. Miller, for appellant. 
______________________