Case Title: Robino-Bay Court v. West Willow-Bay Court

Citation: 

Docket Number: 649, 2007

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2007-12-21T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
ROBINO-BAY COURT PLAZA, LLC, 
§  
a Delaware Limited Liability Company, and §  
ROBINO-BAY COURT PAD, LLC., a  
§  
Delaware Limited Liability Company,  
§   No. 649, 2007 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§  
 
Defendants Below, 
 
 
 
§  
 
Appellants,  
 
 
 
§  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§  
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
 
§  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§  
WEST WILLOW-BAY COURT, LLC., 
§  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§  
 
Plaintiff Below, 
 
 
 
§  
 
Appellee. 
 
 
 
 
§  
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Submitted:  December 18, 2007 
 
 
 
 
 
      Decided:  December 21, 2007 
 
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and BERGER, Justices. 
 
O R D E R 
 
 
This 21st day of December 2007, it appears to the Court that: 
 
1) 
The appellants have filed an application for this Court to accept 
an appeal for interlocutory review.   
 
2) 
The Court of Chancery declined to certify this proceeding for 
interlocutory review.  This Court has considered the memorandum opinion 
of the Court of Chancery dated November 2, 2007, its decision declining to 
certify this matter for interlocutory review, and the submissions to this Court 
 
2
by the parties.  This Court’s recent opinion in Appriva,1 did not change the 
Delaware law on the interpretation of contracts.2 
 
3) 
Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the 
sound discretion of this Court and are accepted only in extraordinary 
circumstances.  In the exercise of its discretion, this Court has concluded 
that the applications for interlocutory review do not meet the requirements of 
Supreme Court Rule 42 and should be refused.   
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 
application for interlocutory review in this matter be, and the same is hereby, 
REFUSED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Randy J. Holland 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice 
 
                                          
 
1 Appriva Shareholder Litigation Co., LLC, et al. v. EV3, Inc., 2007 WL 3208783 (Del. 
Nov. 1, 2007). 
2 See Eagle v. DeVilbiss Health Care, Inc., 702 A.2d 1228, 1232 (Del. 1997) and Klair v. 
Reese, 531 A.2d 219, 223 (Del. 1987).