Case Title: Nesheim v. Nesheim

Citation: 

Docket Number: 20160159

State: north-dakota

Court: North Dakota Supreme Court

Date: 2016-12-20T00:00:00Z

Document:
Nesheim v. Nesheim  Court Description: District court order denying post-judgment motion to amend findings of fact summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2016 ND 244 Christine M. Nesheim, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Eric Nesheim, Defendant No. 20160159 Appeal from the District Court of Traill County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas R. Olson, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Christine M. Nesheim, 718 5th Avenue Southeast, Mayville, N.D. 58257, plaintiff and appellant; submitted on brief. Eric Nesheim, defendant; no appearance. Nesheim v. NesheimNo. 20160159Per Curiam.[¶1] Christine Nesheim appeals from a district court order denying her post-judgment motion to amend findings of fact. On appeal she argues, among other things, that the district court erred in its division of the parties' property, debts and mineral interests; the court erred in failing to award temporary spousal and child support back to February 2015; the court erred in dividing Eric Nesheim's business property and debts; and the court incorrectly named the pension fund for purposes of a qualified domestic relations order. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Carol Ronning Kapsner Dale V. Sandstrom