Case Title: Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Davis

Citation: 

Docket Number: 2ag/24

State: maryland

Court: Maryland Supreme Court

Date: 2024-07-09T00:00:00Z

Document:
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE 
COMMISSION OF MARYLAND 
 
 
 
 
v. 
 
MARY ELIZABETH DAVIS 
* 
 
* 
 
* 
 
* 
 
* 
 
 
     IN THE 
 
     SUPREME COURT 
 
     OF MARYLAND 
 
     AG Docket No. 2 
 
     September Term, 2024     
ORDER 
 
 
After the Attorney Grievance Commission filed its petition for disciplinary or 
remedial action, which alleged that discipline had been imposed by the District of Columbia 
Court of Appeals, the Court required the parties to show cause why corresponding discipline 
should not be imposed. Neither party responded to the Court’s order.  
Upon consideration of the petition for disciplinary or remedial action, it is this 9th day 
of July 2024, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, 
 
ORDERED that, nunc pro tunc to July 29, 2023, respondent, Mary Elizabeth Davis, is 
suspended from the practice of law for 30 days with the entirety of the suspension stayed 
under the following conditions, both of which have already been satisfied: 
(a) 
that respondent not be the subject of a disciplinary complaint that results in a 
finding of misconduct in this or any other jurisdiction for the nine-month 
period that started on June 21, 2022, and 
(b) 
that respondent take three hours of continuing legal education courses in legal 
ethics. 
 
 
 
 
 
            /s/ Matthew J. Fader            
     Chief Justice 
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal 
Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State 
Government Article) this document is authentic. 
 
Gregory Hilton, Clerk 
 2024.07.09
'00'04- 14:03:30