Case Title: Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Tatung

Citation: 

Docket Number: 38ag/22

State: maryland

Court: Maryland Supreme Court

Date: 2023-08-15T00:00:00Z

Document:
O R D E R 
 
 
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand filed by the Petitioner, the 
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, and Respondent, Celestine Tatung, on 
August 9, 2023, in the above-captioned case, in which the parties advise that the 
Respondent agrees that his conduct, as described in the Joint Petition, violated Rule 1.15 
(safekeeping property) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct and 
Federal Immigration Rules of Professional Conduct of Practitioners, 8 C.F.R. § 
1003.102(n) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), (q)(1) and (2) 
(diligence), and (r)(1)-(3) (communication) and that the Respondent consents to a 
reprimand, it is this 15th day of August 2023 
 
ORDERED, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that the Respondent, Celestine 
Tatung, is REPRIMANDED for violating Rule 1.15 (safekeeping property) of the District 
of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct and Federal Immigration Rules of Professional 
Conduct of Practitioners, 8 C.F.R. §1003.102(n) (conduct prejudicial to the administration 
of justice), (q)(1) and (2) (diligence), and (r)(1)-(3) (communication). 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
          Shirley M. Watts 
 
     Senior Justice 
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE 
COMMISSION OF MARYLAND 
 
 
 
 
v. 
 
CELESTINE TATUNG 
* 
 
* 
 
* 
 
* 
 
* 
 
* 
     IN THE 
 
     SUPREME COURT 
 
     OF MARYLAND 
 
     AG No. 38 
 
     September Term, 2022     
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials 
Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this 
document is authentic. 
 
Gregory Hilton, Clerk 
2023-08-15 14:01-04:00