Case Title: Coty v. Ramsey Assoc.

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: vermont

Court: Vermont Supreme Court

Date: 1989-04-01T00:00:00Z

Document:
NOTICE:  This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P.
40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports.
Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Vermont Supreme
Court, 111 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05602 of any errors in order
that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press.
 
 
                                No. 88-346
 
 
Victor and Mary Coty, Donald and             Supreme Court
Dorothy Nelson d/b/a Stowe Country
Shop and Anton and Pamela Flory              On Appeal from
d/b/a Die Alpen Rose Motel                   Lamoille Superior Court
 
     v.
                                             April Term, 1989
Ramsey Associates, Inc.; Normand
Ramsey and Raymond Ramsey
 
 
Linda Levitt, J., Presiding, and Shirley I. Locke and Charles A. Bailey,
  Assistant Judges
 
Harold B. Stevens, Stowe, for plaintiffs-appellants
 
Robert D. Rachlin and Anita Tuttle of Downs, Rachlin & Martin, Burlington,
  and Peter L. Murray and Thomas C. Newman of Murray, Plumb & Murray,
  Portland, Maine, for defendants-appellees Ramsey Associates, Inc., and
  Normand Ramsey
 
 
PRESENT:  Peck,(FN1) Dooley, and Morse, JJ., and Barney, C.J. (Ret.), and Dier,
 Super. J. (Ret.), Specially Assigned
 
 
     DOOLEY, J.   This is the second appeal generated in the course of
protracted litigation concerning the establishment of a deliberately
offensive pig farm in Stowe.  The relevant facts are detailed in Coty v.
Ramsey Associates, Inc., 149 Vt. 451,