Case Title: State v. Razo

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: hawaii

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court

Date: 2006-12-19T00:00:00Z

Document:
No. 26604

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAT'T

 

STATE OF HAWAI'T, Plainti¢f-Appellee 3
vs, 2 4m
VINCE WILLIAM RAZO, Defendant-Appellant <= SE

APPEAL FROM THE sécoND cuncuIT cour |F

(CR. NO. 03-1-0293) al 2

‘ORDER
(ay: Duffy, J. for the court!)
upon consideration of the motion for extension of tine
to file an application for a writ of certiorari, it appears that
HRS § 602-59(c) (Supp. 2005), as amended by Act 149, 2006 Hawai'i
Session Laws, does not authorize the appellate court to extend
the ninety-day period for filing an application for a writ of
certiorari. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for extension of
time to file an application for a writ of certiorari is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai"t, December 19, 2006.

FOR THE COURT:

Yen €. Dads

Associate Justice

 

‘considered by: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy,
gs