Case Title: Bahlitzanakis v. Robinson

Citation: 

Docket Number: 103, 2011

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2011-08-16T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
DIMITROIS and MARIA 
§ 
BAHLITZANAKIS, 
§ 
No. 103, 2011 
 
 
§ 
 
Plaintiffs/ 
§ 
 
Counterclaim Defendants Below- § 
Court Below:  Superior Court 
 
Appellants/Cross Appellees, 
§ 
of the State of Delaware in and 
 
 
§ 
for Kent County 
v. 
 
§ 
 
 
 
§ 
C.A. No. 06C–12–029 
WILLIAM A. ROBINSON, 
§ 
 
CHU PAO ROBINSON, and 
§ 
MENG ROBINSON 
§ 
 
 
§ 
 
 
Defendants/ 
§ 
 
Counterclaim Plaintiffs Below- 
§ 
 
Appellees/Cross Appellants. 
§ 
 
Submitted:  July 25, 2011 
Decided:  August 16, 2011 
 
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, JACOBS, and RIDGELY, Justices. 
 
O R D E R 
This 16th day of August 2011, having considered the briefs filed by the 
Appellants/Cross-Appellees, Dimitrios and Maria Bahlitzanakis, and the 
Appellees/Cross-Appellants, William A. Robinson, Chu Pao Robinson, and Meng 
Robinson, the Court concludes that the judgment of the Superior Court should be 
affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court’s February 7, 2011 Order.1  The 
                                          
 
1 Bahlitzanakis v. Robinson, 2011 WL 441336 (Del. Super. Feb. 7, 2011). 
 
2
Superior Court did not err in interpreting the lease agreement and its factual 
findings are supported by the record. 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 
Court is AFFIRMED. 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Henry duPont Ridgely 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice