Case Title: Himalaya-Fidele v. Blondin

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: hawaii

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court

Date: 2009-04-20T00:00:00Z

Document:
LAW LIBRARY

No. 29724
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAT'T

CAROL JEAN HIMALAYA-PIDELE, Petitioner,
THE HONORABLE KAREN N. BLONDIN, JUDGE OF THE crgurT 5
COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI'I-and
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AS TRUSTEE FOR OPTION ONE
MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2007-CP1 ASSET-BACKED.
CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-CPl, Respondents

 

   

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING -
(CIVIL NO. 08-1-1478)

ORDER
(By: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ. and
Intermediate Court of Appeals Judge Watanabe,
‘assigned by reason of vacancy)

upon consideration of the petition for a writ of
prohibition filed by petitioner Carol Jean Himalaya-Fidele and
the papers in support, it appears that the granting and entry of
a writ of ejectment is innediately appealable pursuant to HRS §

(Supp. 2008). See Penn v. Transportation Lease Hay.

630 P.2d 646, 649 (1981); Ciesla

(1995), Petitioner can

eat-2(a)
Ltd, 2 Haw. App. 272, 274,

Reddish, 78 Hawai'i 18, 889 P.2d 702
appeal from a writ of ejectment and can seek @ stay of the writ
‘Thus, petitioner is not

See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i

(A weit of prohibition is an

pending appeal pursuant to HRAP 8.
entitled to extraordinary relief.
200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999)
extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner
demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack

of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or

obtain the requested action, Such writs are not intended to

supersede the legal discretionary authority of the lower courts,
nor are they intended to serve as legal remedies in lieu of
normal appellate procedures.). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
prohibition is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, april 20, 2009.

Sr

Ranta 6 nertapane

aa

Booms, Dvbliss

Qunie KQ Klatarabe_