Case Title: Wong v. Getz

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: hawaii

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court

Date: 2005-10-13T00:00:00Z

Document:
LAW UBRARY

*** NOT FOR PUBLICATION ***
No. 27391

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
DAMIEN WONG and EDMUND WONG, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
ROBERT GETZ; SHELL DEVELOPMENT CORP.-LAWAI, a Hawai'i
corporation; TURTLE COVE REALTY, a Hawai"! corporation,
Defendants-Appellees,

and

JOHN DOES 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10; and DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10;
DOE ASSOCIATIONS 1-10; and DOE OTHER ENTITIES 1-10, Defendants,

and
SHELL DEVELOPMENT CORP.-LAWAI, Third-Party Plaintiff,

 

TURTLE COVE REALTY; REAL ESTATE CONSULTANTS OF KONA; and
ROES 1-10, Third-Party Defendants.

ms
‘sae

ue

APPEAL FROM THE FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT
(CIV. NO. 98-0339)

 

0380
wi

aa

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
(By: Nakayama, J. for the court!)

Ale HY EL

Upon review of the record, it appears that the circuit
court’s June 16, 2005 order granting sunmary judgment as to all

defendants was not reduced to a separate judgment, as required by

RCP S6. See Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & wright, 76

Hawai'i 118, 669 P.2d 1334 (1994) (an order that resolves claims

in a circuit court civil case is not appealable unless the order

is reduced to separate judgment pursuant to HRCP S@ by the time

Sconesds

 

1d by: Moen, C.

 

Levinson, Nakayane, Acobe, and Duffy, J
*** NOT FOR PUBLICATION ***

the record is filed in the supreme court). Thus, the appeal of
the June 16, 2005 order is premature and we lack jurisdiction.
Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed for
lack of appellate jurisdiction.

Dated: Honolulu, Hawai'i,

FOR THE COURT:

Bente Cm Que

Associate Justice