Case Title: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Ex rel Gerald Pappert, Attorney General v. Coy (Per Curiam Order)

Citation: 

Docket Number: 171MAP2004

State: pennsylvania

Court: Pennsylvania Supreme Court

Date: 2004-10-15T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA EX REL. GERALD J. PAPPERT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellant v. JEFFREY W. COY, Appellee : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 171 MAP 2004 Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court entered on 9/24/04 (exited 9/27/04) at No. 640 MD 2004 ORDER PER CURIAM: Decided: October 15, 2004 AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2004, this Court having determined that the ripeness doctrine is not an impediment to further proceedings in the present matter, the order of dismissal entered by the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings. See generally City Council of Phila. v. Commonwealth, 806 A.2d 975, 978-80 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2002) (discussing the doctrine of ripeness), vacated and remanded on ripeness grounds, 847 A.2d 55 (Pa. 2004). Appellant’s request for oral argument is denied, and jurisdiction is relinquished.