Case Title: Persico v. Russo

Citation: 721 So. 2d 302

Docket Number: 92685

State: florida

Court: Florida Supreme Court

Date: 1998-11-25T00:00:00Z

Document:
721 So. 2d 302 (1998)
Anthony PERSICO, et al., Petitioners,
v.
Robert RUSSO, Respondent.
No. 92685.

Supreme Court of Florida.
November 25, 1998.
Leigh Katzman of Katzman & Korr, P.A., Margate, for Petitioners.
Stephan P. Lange of Lange and Lange, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Respondent.
PARIENTE, Justice.
We have for review a decision certifying the following question to be of great public importance:
Russo v. Persico, 706 So. 2d 933, 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
We resolved this issue in Von Eiff v. Azicri, 720 So. 2d 510, 23 Fla.L. Weekly S583 (Fla.1998). We rephrase the certified question here, as we did in Von Eiff:
For the reasons stated in our decision in Von Eiff, we answer the rephrased question in the affirmative, and approve the decision below.
It is so ordered.
HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.