Case Title: Berger v. Port Clinton

Citation: 1994-Ohio-429

Docket Number: 19931399

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 1994-12-27T00:00:00Z

Document:
OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO                              
                                                                                 
              **** SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITING ****                               
                                                                                 
     The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio                 
are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992,                     
pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas                  
J. Moyer.                                                                        
     Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's                   
Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio.  Attention:  Walter S.                      
Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative                         
Assistant.  Tel.:  (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010.  Your                 
comments on this pilot project are also welcome.                                 
     NOTE:  Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the                  
full texts of the opinions after they have been released                         
electronically to the public.  The reader is therefore advised                   
to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West                       
Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions.                     
The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume                    
and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound                   
volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.                                            
                                                                                 
Berger et al., Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. City of Port                   
Clinton, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.                                           
[Cite as Berger v. Port Clinton (1994),     Ohio St.3d    .]                     
Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.                      
     (No. 93-1399 -- Submitted October 12, 1994 -- Decided                       
December 27, 1994.)                                                              
     Appeal and Cross-Appeal from the Court of Appeals for                       
Ottawa County, No. 92-OT-037.                                                    
                                                                                 
     Spitler & Williams-Young Co., L.P.A., Steven M. Spitler,                    
Marc G. Williams-Young and Debra M. Jennings, for appellants and                 
cross-appellees.                                                                 
     Flynn, Py & Kruse, L.P.A., and John A. Coppeler, for                        
appellee and cross-appellant.                                                    
                                                                                 
     This cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been                         
improvidently allowed.                                                           
     A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and                    
Pfeifer, JJ., concur.                                                            
     Moyer, C.J., dissents.                                                      
     Moyer, C.J., dissenting.  I dissent.  I would affirm the                    
well-reasoned decision of the court of appeals.