Case Title: McBride v. State

Citation: 554 So. 2d 1160

Docket Number: 73514

State: florida

Court: Florida Supreme Court

Date: 1989-11-30T00:00:00Z

Document:
554 So. 2d 1160 (1989)
Michael McBRIDE, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 73514.

Supreme Court of Florida.
November 30, 1989.
Rehearing Denied January 29, 1990.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Ellen Morris, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Patricia G. Lampert, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.
BARKETT, Justice.
We have for review McBride v. State, 535 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), in which the district court affirmed on authority of State v. Avery, 531 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). In Avery, the district court certified the following question to be of great public importance:
Id. at 188. We have discretionary jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in Bostick v. State, 554 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 1989), we answer the certified question, as rephrased therein, in the affirmative, quash the opinion of the district court, and remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with Bostick.
It is so ordered.
EHRLICH, C.J., and SHAW and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
GRIMES, J., dissents with an opinion, in which OVERTON and McDONALD, JJ., concur.
GRIMES, Justice, dissenting.
I dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Bostick v. State, 554 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 1989).
OVERTON and McDONALD, JJ., concur.