Case Title: Disciplinary Counsel v. Booher

Citation: 1997-Ohio-65

Docket Number: 

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 1997-07-09T00:00:00Z

Document:
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL V. BOOHER. 
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Booher (1997), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] 
 
(No. 95-2554 — Submitted and decided July 9, 1997.) 
 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
 
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 
application for reinstatement by respondent Michael R. Booher, a.k.a. 
Michael Robert Booher, Attorney Registration No. 0007694, last known 
address in Middletown, Ohio. 
 
The court coming now to consider its order of May 29, 1996, wherein 
the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a 
period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with 
that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).  Therefore,  
 
IT IS ORDERED by this court that Michael R. Booher, a.k.a. Michael 
Robert Booher, is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in the state of 
Ohio. 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified 
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that 
 
2
publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that 
respondent bear the costs of publication. 
 
For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Booher (1996), 75 Ohio 
St.3d 509, 664 N.E.2d 522. 
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and 
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.