Case Title: Chevalier, T. v. General Nutrition Centers, Aplt. (concurring/dissenting)

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: pennsylvania

Court: Pennsylvania Supreme Court

Date: 2019-11-20T00:00:00Z

Document:
[J-26A&B-2019][M.O. - Baer, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT TAWNY L. CHEVALIER AND ANDREW HILLER, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Appellees v. GENERAL NUTRITION CENTERS, INC. AND GENERAL NUTRITION CORPORATION, Appellants : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Nos. 22 & 23 WAP 2018 Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court entered 12/22/17 at Nos. 1437 WDA 2016 and 92 WDA 2017, affirming in part and reversing in part the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County entered 12/29/16 at No. GD 13-017194 and remanding ARGUED: April 10, 2019 CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR DECIDED: NOVEMBER 20, 2019 I agree with the reasoning set forth in the concurring and dissenting opinion in the Superior Court, authored by Judge Solano, and would adopt that position here. See Chevalier v. Gen. Nutrition Ctrs., Inc., 177 A.3d 280, 303-08 (Pa. Super. 2017) (Solano, J., concurring and dissenting).