Case Title: Ostroff v. Quality Services

Citation: 

Docket Number: 82, 2007

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2007-04-30T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
MARGARET E. OSTROFF, 
Plaintiff/Counterclaim 
Defendant Below, 
Appellant, 
v. 
QUALITY SERVICES 
LABORATORIES, INC., 
Defendant/Counterclaim 
Plaintiff Below, 
Appellee. 
§ 
§  No. 82, 2007 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below—Court of Chancery 
§  of the State of Delaware, 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§  C.A. No. 423-NC 
§ 
§   
§ 
§ 
 
O R D E R 
 
This 30th day of April 2007, it appears to the Court that, on April 9, 2007, 
the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed 
pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant's failure to diligently 
prosecute her appeal by not filing her opening brief and appendix in this matter.  
The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required 
ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme 
Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED. 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
/s/ Jack B. Jacobs 
Justice