Case Title: Maddox v. State

Citation: 

Docket Number: 273, 2012

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2012-07-30T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
GARY MADDOX, 
 
Defendant Below- 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
STATE OF DELAWARE, 
 
Plaintiff Below- 
Appellee. 
§ 
§  No. 273, 2012 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below—Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware, 
§  in and for Sussex County 
§  Cr. ID 0802028998 
§ 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted:  June 25, 2012 
 
 
 
 
  Decided:  July 30, 2012 
 
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND, and RIDGELY, Justices 
 
O R D E R 
 
 
This 30th day of July 2012, after careful consideration of the opening brief, 
motion to affirm, and record on appeal, we find it manifest that the judgment 
below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court=s well-reasoned 
decision dated May 7, 2012. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that 
appellant’s second motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred and 
that appellant had failed to overcome the procedural hurdles. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 
Court is AFFIRMED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Myron T. Steele 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chief Justice