Case Title: State of Florida v. John Matke

Citation: 

Docket Number: SC92-476

State: florida

Court: Florida Supreme Court

Date: 2000-06-15T00:00:00Z

Document:
Supreme Court of Florida
 
____________
No. SC92476
____________
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Petitioner,
vs.
JOHN MATKE,
Respondent.
[June 15, 2000]
PER CURIAM.
We have for review the decision in Matke v. State, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D469 (Fla.
1st DCA Feb. 13, 1998), on the basis of certified conflict.  We have jurisdiction.
See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.  For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Maddox
v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S367 (Fla. May 11, 2000), we quash the decision below
and find that the unpreserved sentencing error in this case regarding costs does not
constitute fundamental error.
It is so ordered.
-2-
HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and
QUINCE, JJ., concur.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND IF
FILED, DETERMINED. 
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Certified
Direct Conflict of Decisions
First District - Case No. 1D97-1386
(Jackson County)
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, James W. Rogers, Bureau Chief, Criminal
Appeals, and L. Michael Billmeier, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida,
for Petitioner
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Angela Shelley, Assistant Public Defender,
Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, Florida,
for Respondent