Case Title: Udo v. Umoren-Udo

Citation: 

Docket Number: 401, 2006

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2006-10-03T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
VICTOR E. UDO, 
 
Petitioner Below- 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
FAITH V. UMOREN-UDO, 
 
Respondent Below- 
Appellee. 
§ 
§  No. 401, 2006 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below─Family Court 
§  of the State of Delaware 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§  File No. CN06-01200 
§  Petition No. 06-00951 
§ 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: September 21, 2006 
 
 
 
 
   Decided: October 3, 2006 
 
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and BERGER, Justices 
 
 
 
 
 
 
O R D E R  
 
 
This third day of October 2006, the Court has considered the 
appellee’s motion to affirm pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 25(a) and finds 
it manifest on the face of the appellant’s opening brief that the appeal is 
without merit for the reasons stated by the Family Court in its decision dated 
June 29, 2006.  We conclude that there was no error or abuse of discretion 
on the part of the Family Court in affirming the commissioner’s February 3, 
2006 order.  
 
 
 
 
2
 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the appellee’s motion to 
affirm is GRANTED.  The judgment of the Family Court is AFFIRMED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Randy J. Holland 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice