Case Title: In re Cases Held for the Decision in State v. Brunning

Citation: 2012-Ohio-5777

Docket Number: 

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2012-12-07T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as In 
re Cases Held for the Decision in State v. Brunning, Slip Opinion No. 2012-Ohio-5777.] 
 
NOTICE 
This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in 
an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports.  Readers are requested 
to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 
65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or 
other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be 
made before the opinion is published. 
 
SLIP OPINION NO. 2012-OHIO-5777 
IN RE CASES HELD FOR THE DECISION IN STATE v. BRUNNING. 
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets,  
it may be cited as In re Cases Held for the Decision in State v. Brunning,  
Slip Opinion No. 2012-Ohio-5777.] 
 (Submitted December 4, 2012—Decided December 7, 2012.) 
__________________ 
{¶ 1} The following cases were held for the decision in State v. 
Brunning, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2012-Ohio-5752, ___ N.E.2d ___.  The judgments 
of the courts of appeals are affirmed.  See State v. Howard, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 
2012-Ohio-5738, ___ N.E.2d ___.   
{¶ 2} 2012-0236.  State v. Harrison, Montgomery App. No. 24471, 
2011-Ohio-6803.  
{¶ 3} 2012-0328.  State v. Williams, Montgomery App. No. 24452, 
2012-Ohio-107.  
{¶ 4} 2012-0346.  State v. Cook, Montgomery App. No. 24611, 2012-
Ohio-198.   
{¶ 5} 2012-0375 and 2012-0381.  State v. Smith, Cuyahoga App. Nos. 
96582, 96622, and 96623, 2012-Ohio-261.   
__________________ 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 
2 
 
{¶ 6} The following cases were held for the decision in State v. 
Brunning, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2012-Ohio-5752, ___ N.E.2d ___.  The judgments 
of the courts of appeals are reversed, and the causes are remanded for further 
proceedings consistent with this court’s decision in Brunning. 
{¶ 7} 2011-1062.  State v. Gilbert, Cuyahoga App. Nos. 95083 and 
95084, 2011-Ohio-1928.   
{¶ 8} 2011-1548.  State v. Greenlee, Cuyahoga App. No. 96002, 2011-
Ohio-3692.  
{¶ 9} 2011-1553.  State v. Grunden, Cuyahoga App. No. 95909, 2011-
Ohio-3687.  
{¶ 10} 2011-2093 and 2011-2187.  State v. Ogletree, Cuyahoga App. No. 
96438, 2011-Ohio-5846.   
{¶ 11} 2012-0194.  State v. Williams, Cuyahoga App. No. 97005, 2011-
Ohio-6763.   
{¶ 12} 2012-1039.  State v. Kempson, Cuyahoga App. Nos. 97409 and 
97410, 2012-Ohio-1954.   
__________________ 
{¶ 13} The following cases were held for the decision in State v. 
Brunning, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2012-Ohio-5752, ___ N.E.2d ___.  The causes are 
remanded for application of this court’s decision in Brunning.   
{¶ 14} 2011-1061.  State v. Campbell, Cuyahoga App. No. 95348, 2011-
Ohio-2281.   
{¶ 15} 2012-0196.  State v. Caldero, Cuyahoga App. No. 96719, 2012-
Ohio-11.   
{¶ 16} 2012-1074.  State v. Harris, Hamilton App. Nos. C-100243 and C-
100273, 2012-Ohio-2460.   
January Term, 2012 
3 
 
{¶ 17} 2012-1210.  State v. Brown, Cuyahoga App. No. 97746, 2012-
Ohio-2515.   
__________________ 
{¶ 18} The following cases were held for the decision in State v. 
Brunning, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2012-Ohio-5752, ___ N.E.2d ___.  In both cases, 
the convictions are affirmed, and the sentences are reversed.  The causes are 
remanded to the appellate court for further proceedings consistent with this 
court’s decision in State v. Brunning and State v. Howard, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 
2012-Ohio-5738, ___ N.E.2d ___.  
{¶ 19} 2012-1100.  State v. Topping, Warren App. No. CA2011-07-067, 
2012-Ohio-2259.    
{¶ 20} 2011-1923.  State v. Bowling, Hamilton App. No. C-100323, 2011-
Ohio-4946.   
O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL 
LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.   
______________________