Case Title: Weidman v. Rantz

Citation: 

Docket Number: 216, 2012

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2012-05-23T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
SUSAN PITTARD WEIDMAN, 
 
Defendant Below- 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
GARY F. RANTZ, 
 
          Plaintiff Below- 
          Appellee. 
§ 
§  No. 216, 2012 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below—Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware, in and 
§  for New Castle County 
§  C.A. No. N11C-06-043 
§ 
§ 
 
Submitted: May 15, 2012 
Decided: 
May 23, 2012 
 
Before BERGER, JACOBS, and RIDGELY, Justices. 
 
 
O R D E R 
 
This 23rd day of May 2012, it appears to the Court that: 
(1) Defendant, Susan Weidman, has petitioned this Court, pursuant to 
Supreme Court Rule 42, to accept an appeal from an interlocutory order of the 
Superior Court dated April 17, 2012.  The trial court’s order denied Weidman’s 
motion for judgment on the pleadings and/or summary judgment. 
(2) Weidman filed her application for certification to take an interlocutory 
appeal in the Superior Court on April 20, 2012.  The Superior Court denied the 
certification application on May 14, 2012. 
(3) Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound 
discretion of this Court.  In the exercise of its discretion, this Court has concluded 
 
 
-2-
that the application for interlocutory review does not meet the requirements of 
Supreme Court Rule 42(b) and should be refused. 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the within 
interlocutory appeal be REFUSED. 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
/s/ Jack B. Jacobs 
        Justice