Case Title: Lamar OCI S. Corp. v. Stanly Cty. Zoning Bd. of Adjust.

Citation: 362 N.C. 670

Docket Number: 485A07

State: north-carolina

Court: North Carolina Supreme Court

Date: 2008-12-12T00:00:00Z

Document:
LAMAR OCI SOUTH CORPORATION d/b/a Lamar Advertising of Asheville,
Petitioner v. STANLY COUNTY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT and STANLY
COUNTY, Respondents
No. 485A07 
FILED: 12 DECEMBER 2008
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the
decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 186 N.C.
App. 44, 650 S.E.2d 37 (2007), reversing an order entered on 19
April 2006 and affirming an order entered on 28 April 2006, both
by Judge Mark E. Klass in Superior Court, Stanly County.  On 6
March 2008, the Supreme Court allowed petitioner’s petition for
discretionary review of additional issues.  Heard in the Supreme
Court 14 October 2008.
Van Winkle, Buck, Wall, Starnes & Davis, P.A., by Craig
D. Justus, for petitioner-appellee/appellant.
Hamilton Moon Stephens Steele & Martin, PLLC, by Robert
C. Stephens and Mark R. Kutny, for respondent-
appellants/appellees.
PER CURIAM.
As to the issue on direct appeal based on the
dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court
of Appeals.  We conclude that the petition for discretionary
review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY
ALLOWED IN PART.