Case Title: Disciplinary Counsel v. Manning

Citation: 2009-Ohio-3723

Docket Number: 20060738 and 20080037

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2009-06-30T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Manning, 122 Ohio St.3d 1222, 2009-Ohio-3723.] 
 
 
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MANNING. 
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Manning,  
122 Ohio St.3d 1222, 2009-Ohio-3723.] 
(Nos. 2006-0738 and 2008-0037 — Submitted June 23, 2009 — Decided  
June 30, 2009.) 
ON APPLICATIONS FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
__________________ 
{¶ 1} These causes came on for further consideration upon the filing of 
applications for reinstatement by respondent, Thomas Joel Manning, Attorney 
Registration No. 0059759, last known business address in Dayton, Ohio. 
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of November 22, 2006 
in case No. 2006-0738 wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), 
suspended respondent for a period of two years, finds that respondent has 
substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. 
V(10)(A).  Therefore, 
{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the 
practice of law in the state of Ohio in case No. 2006-0738. 
{¶ 4} The court coming now to consider its order of July 8, 2008 in case 
No. 2008-0037 wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended 
respondent for a period of six months to commence at the conclusion of the two-
year suspension ordered in case No. 2006-0738, followed by a two-year 
probationary period, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that 
order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).  Therefore, 
{¶ 5} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the 
practice of law in the state of Ohio in case No. 2008-0037.  It is further ordered 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 
2 
that respondent is hereby placed on monitored probation for a period of two years 
from the date of this order. 
{¶ 6} It is further ordered that on or before 30 days from the date of this 
order, relator shall file with the Clerk of this court the name of the attorney who 
will serve as respondent's monitor, in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(9).  It is 
further ordered that at the end of respondent's probationary period in case No. 
2008-0037, relator shall file with the Clerk of this court a report indicating 
whether respondent, during the probationary period, complied with the terms of 
the probation. 
{¶ 7} It is further ordered that at the end of the probationary period, 
respondent may apply for termination of probation as provided in Gov.Bar R. 
V(9).  It is further ordered that respondent's probation shall not be terminated until 
(1) respondent files an application for termination of probation in compliance 
with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D), (2) respondent complies with this and all other orders 
issued by this court, (3) respondent complies with the Rules for the Government 
of the Bar of Ohio, (4) relator files with the Clerk of this court a report indicating 
that respondent has complied with the terms of the probation, and (5) this court 
orders that the probation be terminated. 
{¶ 8} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified 
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be 
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the 
costs of publication. 
{¶ 9} For earlier cases, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Manning, 111 Ohio 
St.3d 349, 2006-Ohio-5794, 856 N.E.2d 259, and 119 Ohio St.3d 52, 2008-Ohio-
3319, 891 N.E.2d 743. 
 
MOYER, 
C.J., 
and 
PFEIFER, 
LUNDBERG 
STRATTON, 
O’CONNOR, 
O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. 
______________________