Case Title: Saunders v. Warden Phelps

Citation: 

Docket Number: 233, 2009

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2009-05-20T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
ROBERT SAUNDERS, 
 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
No. 233, 2009 
 
Plaintiff Below, 
 
 
§ 
 
Appellant, 
 
 
 
§ 
Court Below—Superior Court  
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
of the State of Delaware in and 
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
§ 
for New Castle County 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
WARDEN PERRY PHELPS, 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
§ 
 
 
Defendant Below,  
 
§ 
C. A. No. 09C-02-224 
 
Appellee. 
 
 
 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: 
May 12, 2009 
 
 
 
 
Decided: 
May 20, 2009 
 
O R D E R 
 
 
This 20th day of May 2009, the Court has considered the Clerk’s notice directing 
the appellant to show cause pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) why this appeal 
should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with Supreme Court Rule 42 when 
taking an appeal from an apparent interlocutory order.  The appellant has not responded 
to the notice to show cause.  The appellant’s failure to respond to the notice to show 
cause is deemed to be his consent to the dismissal of this appeal. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 
3(b)(2), 29(b) and 42, that the appeal is DISMISSED.   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Jack B. Jacobs 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
         Justice