Case Title: Lazaro Flores v. State of Florida

Citation: 

Docket Number: SC10-2198

State: florida

Court: Florida Supreme Court

Date: 2012-06-07T00:00:00Z

Document:
Supreme Court of Florida 
 
 
____________ 
 
No. SC10-2198 
____________ 
 
LAZARO FLORES,  
Petitioner, 
 
vs. 
 
STATE OF FLORIDA,  
Respondent. 
 
[June 7, 2012] 
 
PER CURIAM. 
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District 
Court of Appeal in Flores v. State, 46 So. 3d 102 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010), based on 
express and direct conflict.  See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.  Upon further 
consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. 
Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding. 
It is so ordered. 
 
CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and 
PERRY, JJ., concur. 
LEWIS, J., dissents. 
 
 
 
 
- 2 - 
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.  
 
 
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Direct 
Conflict of Decisions 
 
 
Third District - Case No. 3D09-1543 
 
 
(Miami-Dade County) 
 
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Manuel Alvarez, Assistant Public 
Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, Florida, 
 
 
for Petitioner 
 
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Richard Polin, 
Bureau Chief and Lunar C. Alvey, Assistant Attorneys General, Miami, Florida, 
 
 
for Respondent