Case Title: In re Wolfrom

Citation: 1997-Ohio-67

Docket Number: 

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 1997-08-28T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN RE WOLFROM. 
[Cite as In re Wolfrom (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 1234.] 
(No. 97-1249 — Submitted and decided August 28, 1997.) 
ON MOTION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
 
On July 11, 1997, this court suspended respondent, Carl T. Wolfrom, a.k.a. 
Carl Thompson Wolfrom, for an interim period pursuant to Gov.Bar R. 
V(5)(A)(4).  On July 15, 1997, respondent filed a motion for reinstatement.  On 
July 16, 1997, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline 
submitted an entry pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1)(c), stating that respondent 
no longer was in default of the child support order previously submitted to the 
court on June 19, 1997.  Upon consideration thereof, 
 
IT IS ORDERED by the court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1), 
respondent, Carl T. Wolfrom, a.k.a. Carl Thompson Wolfrom, Attorney 
Registration No. 0019564, be reinstated to the practice of law. 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the requirements 
of this court’s order dated July 11, 1997, requiring respondent to file with the 
Clerk of this court and with Disciplinary Counsel an affidavit of compliance on or 
before August 11, 1997, and to comply with Gov.Bar R. X(3)(G) be waived. 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(2), 
reinstatement of respondent shall not terminate any disciplinary proceedings that 
may be pending against respondent. 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified 
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be 
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs 
of publication. 
 
2
 
For earlier case, see In re Wolfrom (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 1224, 681 N.E.2d 
1336. 
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and 
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.