Case Title: Disciplinary Counsel v. Shramek

Citation: 2003-Ohio-6805

Docket Number: 

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2003-12-04T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Shramek, 100 Ohio St.3d 1262, 2003-Ohio-6805.] 
1 
 
 
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. SHRAMEK. 
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Shramek, 100 Ohio St.3d 1262, 2003-Ohio-
6805.] 
(No. 2002-2180 — Submitted December 2, 2003 — Decided December 4, 2003.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
__________________ 
{¶1} 
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 
application for reinstatement by respondent, William Jeffrey Shramek, Attorney 
Registration No. 0059936, last known address in Amherst, New York. 
{¶2} 
The court coming now to consider its order of April 16, 2003, 
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a 
period of one year with six months stayed on conditions, finds that respondent has 
substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. 
V(10)(A).  Therefore,  
{¶3} 
IT IS ORDERED by this court that respondent be and hereby is 
reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 
{¶4} 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue 
certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that 
publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that 
respondent bear the costs of publication. 
{¶5} 
For earlier cases, see In re Report of the Comm. on Continuing 
Legal Edn. (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 1437, 761 N.E.2d 627; and Disciplinary 
Counsel v. Shramek, 98 Ohio St.3d 441, 2003-Ohio-1636, 786 N.E.2d 869. 
 
MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, 
O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., concur. 
__________________