Case Title: Foraker v. State

Citation: 

Docket Number: 660, 2009

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2009-12-04T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
ROGER FORAKER,   
 
Defendant Below- 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
STATE OF DELAWARE, 
 
Plaintiff Below- 
Appellee. 
§ 
§  No. 660, 2009 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below─Family Court 
§  of the State of Delaware 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§  Case No. 0603007687 
§ 
§ 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: November 26, 2009 
 
 
 
 
   Decided: December 4, 2009 
 
 
 
 
 
 
O R D E R  
 
 
This 4th day of December 2009, it appears to the Court that, on November 
10, 2009, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be 
dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) on the ground that the Court lacks 
jurisdiction to consider an appeal directly from an order of a Commissioner of the 
Family Court.1  The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause 
within the required ten-day period.  Dismissal of this action is, therefore, deemed 
to be unopposed.2 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the within appeal is 
DISMISSED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Henry duPont Ridgely 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice 
 
                                                 
1 Del. Code Ann. tit. 10, §915(d). 
2 Supr. Ct. R. 3(b) and 29(b).