Case Title: Briseno v. Cook

Citation: 2009-Ohio-308

Docket Number: 20081733

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2009-02-03T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as Briseno v. Cook, 121 Ohio St.3d 38, 2009-Ohio-308.] 
 
 
BRISENO, APPELLANT, v. COOK, WARDEN, APPELLEE. 
[Cite as Briseno v. Cook, 121 Ohio St.3d 38, 2009-Ohio-308.] 
Habeas corpus — Writ not available when petitioner had adequate remedy by 
way of direct appeal — Writ denied. 
(No. 2008-1733 — Submitted December 17, 2008 — Decided February 3, 2009.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Madison County, No. CA2008-05-012. 
__________________ 
 
Per Curiam. 
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the 
habeas corpus petition of appellant, Antonio Briseno.  Appellant had an adequate 
remedy by way of direct appeal from his sentence to raise his claim that he did not 
receive proper notification about postrelease control at his sentencing hearing.  
Patterson v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 120 Ohio St.3d 311, 2008-Ohio-6147, 898 
N.E.2d 950, ¶ 8; Watkins v. Collins, 111 Ohio St.3d 425, 2006-Ohio-5082, 857 
N.E.2d 78, ¶ 45 and 53. 
Judgment affirmed. 
 
MOYER, 
C.J., 
and 
PFEIFER, 
LUNDBERG 
STRATTON, 
O’CONNOR, 
O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. 
__________________ 
 
Kenneth J. Rexford & Co., L.L.C., and Kenneth J. Rexford, for appellant. 
 
Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and M. Scott Criss, Assistant 
Attorney General, for appellee. 
______________________