Case Title: Tamara Joan Haeg, Respondent, vs. SEKO Worldwide d/b/a Vast Logistics,Â Relator,Â and Minnesota Assigned Risk Plan, adm

Citation: 

Docket Number: A07-258

State: minnesota

Court: Minnesota Supreme Court

Date: 2007-06-07T00:00:00Z

Document:
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A07-258 Tamara Joan Haeg, Respondent, vs. SEKO Worldwide d/b/a Vast Logistics, Relator, and Minnesota Assigned Risk Plan, adm'd by Berkley Risk Administrators, Respondent, and Regions Hospital, St. Paul Radiology, North Memorial Ambulance Service, and Twin City Anesthesia Associates, Intervenors. Considered and decided by the court en banc. O R D E R Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed January 4, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton,317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that "[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case). Dated: May 30, 2007 BY THE COURT:     /s/  Sam Hanson Associate Justice