Case Title: Kim v. Ko

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: hawaii

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court

Date: 2005-08-18T00:00:00Z

Document:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION ***
No. 27269

1 Sue

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

a1

ANTHONY KIM, Plaintiff-Appellant, 5

  

NONI KO, aka NONI ANNE JUD, and CATHERINE EILEEN JUD,
Defendant s-Appellees.

 

APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT
(CIV. NO. 99-0322)

(By: Nakayama, J., for the court*)

Upon review of the record, it appears that (1) the
Suprene Court Clerk's Office informed Appellant, ANTHONY KIM, by
letter dated July 15, 2005, that the record on appeal cannot be
filed without payment of the filing fee pursuant to Rule 3(f) of
the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) or an executed
motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to HRAP Rule 24 and
that the matter would be called to the attention of the court for
such action as the court deemed proper pursuant to HRAP Rule
11(a), including dismissal of the appeals and (2) Appellant
failed to pay the filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in
forma pauperis; therefore,

IT 1S HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, August 18, 2005.

FOR THE COURT:

 

 

‘considered by: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, Jv.