Case Title: Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Deardorff

Citation: 1999-Ohio-152

Docket Number: 

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 1999-06-29T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Deardorff, 86 Ohio St.3d 1204, 1999-Ohio-152.] 
 
 
 
 
 
CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. DEARDORFF. 
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Deardorff (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 1204.] 
(No. 98-377 — Submitted and decided June 29, 1999.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
 
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 
application for reinstatement by respondent, Timothy John Deardorff, Attorney 
Registration No. 0006308, last known address in Cincinnati, Ohio. 
 
The court coming now to consider its order of November 25, 1998, wherein 
the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of 
one year with six months stayed, finds that respondent has substantially complied 
with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).  Therefore, 
 
IT IS ORDERED by this court that the last six months of respondent’s one-
year suspension be stayed and, further, that respondent, Timothy John Deardorff, 
be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified 
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be 
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs 
of publication. 
 
For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Deardorff (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 
85, 702 N.E.2d 59. 
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and 
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.