Case Title: Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Florez

Citation: 2003-Ohio-7082

Docket Number: 

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2003-12-18T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Florez, 101 Ohio St.3d 1207, 2003-Ohio-7082.] 
1 
 
 
CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. FLOREZ. 
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Florez, 101 Ohio St.3d 1207, 2003-Ohio-7082.] 
(No. 2002-2223 — Submitted December 15, 2003 — Decided December 18, 
2003.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
__________________ 
{¶1} 
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 
application for reinstatement by respondent, Michael G. Florez, Attorney 
Registration No. 0010693, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio. 
{¶2} 
The court coming now to consider its order of April 16, 2003, 
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a 
period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that 
order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).  Therefore, 
{¶3} 
IT IS ORDERED by this court that respondent be, and hereby is, 
reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 
{¶4} 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue 
certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that 
publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that 
respondent bear the costs of publication. 
{¶5} 
For earlier case, Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Florez, 98 Ohio St.3d 448, 
2003-Ohio-1730, 786 N.E.2d 875. 
 
MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, 
O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., concur. 
__________________