Case Title: Paul O. Stovall v. State of Florida

Citation: 

Docket Number: SC95-059

State: florida

Court: Florida Supreme Court

Date: 2000-08-31T00:00:00Z

Document:
Supreme 
Court 
of 
Florida
 
____________
No.  SC95059
____________
PAUL O. STOVALL,
Petitioner,
vs.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
[August 31, 2000]
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Stovall v. State, 727 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), a
decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal citing as controlling authority its
decision in Maddox v. State, 708 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), approved in
part, disapproved in part, 760 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 2000).  We have jurisdiction.  See
art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So. 2d 418, 420 (Fla. 1981).  We
quash the district court's decision in this case and remand for consideration in light
of our opinion in Maddox v. State, 760 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 2000).  
It is so ordered.
-2-
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and
QUINCE, JJ., concur.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND
IF FILED, DETERMINED.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - 
Direct Conflict
Fifth District - Case No. 5D97-2556 
(Volusia County)
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Susan A. Fagan, Assistant Public
Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, Florida,
for Petitioner
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Kellie A. Nielan, Mary G. Jolley,
Belle B. Schumann, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona
Beach, Florida,
for Respondent