Case Title: Tony Alamo v. Christhiaon Cole

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: arkansas

Court: Arkansas Supreme Court

Date: 1997-04-14T00:00:00Z

Document:
Tony ALAMO v. Christhiaon COIE

 97-318                                            ___ S.W.2d ___

                    Supreme Court of Arkansas
                Opinion delivered April 14, 1997


Appeal & error -- motion for rule on the clerk denied --
     appellant's petition for review properly rejected. -- Where
     the supreme court had considered appellant's petition for
     review and found that it had no merit, appellant's petition
     was properly rejected; the motion for rule on the clerk was
     denied.

     Motion for Rule on the Clerk; denied.
     Eric M. Lieberman, for appellant.
     No response.

     Per Curiam.
     Appellant Tony Alamo, by his attorney, Eric M. Lieberman, has
filed a motion for rule on the clerk.
     Appellant alleges that the Clerk of the Supreme Court rejected
appellant's petition for review because, as a matter of unwritten
practice, "the Supreme Court does not review per curiam decisions
of the Court of Appeals."  If appellant's petition for review was
indeed rejected for the reason stated by appellant's counsel, the
rejection would have been error.  In any event, we have considered
appellant's petition for review and find that it has no merit.
     The motion is, therefore, denied.