Case Title: Bunbury Co. v. Windham Sports

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: vermont

Court: Vermont Supreme Court

Date: 1989-11-01T00:00:00Z

Document:
NOTICE:  This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 4
as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports.
Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Vermont Supreme
Court, 111 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05602 of any errors in order
that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press.


                                No. 89-067


The Bunbury Company, Inc.                    Supreme Court

           v.                                On Appeal from
                                             Windham Superior Court
Windham Sports, Inc., and
Sasaki Associates, Inc.                      November Term, 1989


Alden T. Bryan, J.

Heather Briggs and Andre D. Bouffard of Downs Rachlin & Martin, Burlington,
  and David F. Buckley (Of Counsel), Bellows Falls, for plaintiff-appellee

Timothy U. Martin of Carroll, George & Pratt, Rutland, for defendant-
  appellant


PRESENT:  Allen, C.J., Dooley and Morse, JJ., and Springer, D.J. (Ret.),
          Specially Assigned


     MORSE, J.   Defendant Windham Sports appeals from a judgment of
foreclosure claiming that plaintiff Bunbury Company was barred from
foreclosing its mortgage because it was a foreign corporation that had not
registered to do business in Vermont.  11 V.S.A. {{ 2651, 2668(c).  Summary
judgment was granted in favor of plaintiff, citing Redd Distributing Co.,
Inc. v. Bruckner, 128 Vt. 635,