Case Title: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Yoshimura

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: hawaii

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court

Date: 2005-07-18T00:00:00Z

Document:
No, 24947

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

 

JON CURTIS YOSHIMURA, Respondent.

 

(ope 99-511-6341) 2518

 

(By Moon, €.3., Levinson, Rekayase, Aeaba, and Duffy, 33.)

pen consideration of (1) the September 17, 2002
Aeeidavit of Respondent Jon Curtis Yoshimura (Respondent
Yoshimura) pursuant to Rule 16(@) of the Rules of the Suprene
court of the state of Hawas't (RSCH), (2) Respondent Yoshimura’
arch 29, 2005 petition for reinstatement to the practice of ev,
(3) the May 10, 2008 order denying without prejudice Respondent
Yoshimura’ March 29, 2008 petition for reinatatenent to the
practice of law, (4) Respondent Yoshimura’s July 6, 2005
supplemental affidavit in support of Respondent Yoshimura’ s
petition for reinstatenent, and (5) the record, it appears that
Respondent Yoshimura has substantially complied with the
requixenents of RECH Rule 2.26(@) and RSCH Rule 2.17(b).
therefore,

It 18 HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Jon curtis
Yoshimura (attorney nusber 6101) ia reinstated to the practice of

law in the State of Hawai'i and may resume the practice of law
upon payment of all required registration fees. See
RSCH Rule 17. This order is effective upon entry.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, July 18, 2005.

Gor

AEM —

 

Penta, Crest ane