Case Title: State ex rel. Market/Media Research, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Appeals

Citation: 1995-Ohio-113

Docket Number: 19941997

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 1995-03-07T00:00:00Z

Document:
OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO                               
     The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of                      
Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27,                      
1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice                   
Thomas J. Moyer.                                                                 
     Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's                   
Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio.  Attention:  Walter S.                      
Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative                         
Assistant.  Tel.:  (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010.                       
Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome.                            
     NOTE:  Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the                  
full texts of the opinions after they have been released                         
electronically to the public.  The reader is therefore advised                   
to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West                       
Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions.                     
The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume                    
and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound                   
volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.                                            
                                                                                 
The State ex rel. Market/Media Research, Inc. v. Cuyahoga                        
County Court of Appeals et al.                                                   
[Cite as State ex rel. Market/Media Research, Inc. v. Cuyahoga                   
Cty. Court of Appeals (1995),     Ohio St.3d    .]                               
Motion to dismiss granted.                                                       
     (No. 94-1997 -- Submitted March 7, 1995 --                                  
Decided              , 1995.)                                                    
     In Mandamus.                                                                
     On motion to dismiss or alternatively for summary judgment.                 
                                                                                 
     Snyder, Neff & Chamberlin and Owen Calvin Neff, for                         
relator.                                                                         
     Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting                          
Attorney, Carol Shockley and Gregory B. Rowinski, Assistant                      
Prosecuting Attorneys, for respondents Cuyahoga County Court of                  
Appeals and Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas.                               
                                                                                 
     On motion to dismiss or alternatively for summary                           
judgment.  Motion to dismiss granted.  Cause dismissed.                          
     Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney,                        
Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.                                                   
State ex rel. Market Media Research v. Cuy. Cty. Ct. Appls.                      
     Cook J., concurring.  Given that all of the issues raised                   
in this extraordinary action were either raised or could have                    
been raised in relator's discretionary appeal to this court                      
from the appellate judgment, and that relator had no good                        
ground to support a jurisdictional issue,  I would not only                      
dismiss the complaint, but also award, as attorney fees, $500                    
to the respondents.                                                              
     Wright, J., concurs in the foregoing concurring opinion.