Case Title: Arnold v. DFS

Citation: 

Docket Number: 243, 2010

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2010-07-23T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
KATIE ARNOLD,1   
 
Respondent Below- 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
DFS, 
 
Petitioner Below- 
Appellee. 
§  No. 243, 2010 
§  Court Below─Family Court 
§  of the State of Delaware 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§  File Nos. CN08-05964; 05965  
§                  CN09-05235 
§                  CN09-05241 
§                  E09-10-06TN 
§  Petition Nos. 08-38595; 08-38601 
§                        09-33834; 09-32035 
§                        09-32024; 09-40323 
§                        09-41085 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: July 14, 2010 
 
 
 
 
   Decided: July 23, 2010 
 
 
 
 
 
 
O R D E R  
 
 
This 23rd day of July 2010, it appears to the Court that, on June 22, 
2010, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be 
dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant’s failure 
to diligently prosecute the appeal by failing to pay the Family Court filing 
fee and transcript costs.  The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to 
show cause within the required 10-day period.2  Therefore, dismissal of this 
action is deemed to be unopposed. 
 
                                                 
1 The Court sua sponte assigned a pseudonym to the appellant by Order dated April 29, 
2010.   
2 All attempts by the Office of the Clerk to locate the appellant have failed.  The appellant 
has not notified the Clerk’s Office of her new address and all notices and letters have 
been returned to the sender unclaimed. 
 
2 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court 
Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT:  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Carolyn Berger 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice