Case Title: People v Davis

Citation: 2014 NY Slip Op 08057

Docket Number: 

State: new-york

Court: New York Appellate Court

Date: 2014-11-20T00:00:00Z

Document:
People v Davis

2014 NY Slip Op 08057

Decided on November 20, 2014

Court of Appeals

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 20, 2014

No. 232 SSM 22

[*1]The People & c., Respondent,
vTyrone Davis, Appellant.


Submitted by Steven A. Feldman, for appellant.
Submitted by Thomas Constant, for respondent.


MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant failed to bring a motion to withdraw his plea under CPL 220.60 (3) or a motion to vacate the judgment of conviction pursuant to CPL 440.10. Nor did his factual [*2]recitation negate the intent element of the crime to which he pleaded guilty. His plea therefore does not qualify for the "rare case" exception to the preservation requirement under People v Lopez  (71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]). Consequently, defendant's challenge to the factual sufficiency of his allocution "was properly rejected by the Appellate Division and its order upholding the plea and conviction should be affirmed" (People v Toxey , 86 NY2d 725, 726 [1995]).
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Decided November 20, 2014