Case Title: Laney v. Uecker

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: north-dakota

Court: North Dakota Supreme Court

Date: 1997-09-30T00:00:00Z

Document:
Laney v. Uecker  Laney v. Uecker, 1997 ND 185, 575 N.W.2d 224 Filed Sep. 30, 1997 IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 1997 ND 185Denise Laney,Plaintiff and Appellee v. Shawn Uecker,Defendant and Appellant Civil No. 970076 Appeal from the District Court for Mercer County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable James M. Vukelic, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Richard B. Baer (argued), of Richard B. Baer, P.C., 1003 E. Interstate Ave., P.O. Box 1221, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-1221, for defendant and appellant. R. Rick Maixner (argued), of Schmitz, Moench & Schmidt, 222 North 4th Street, P.O. Box 2076, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2076, for plaintiff and appellee. Laney v. Uecker Civil No. 970076 Per Curiam. [¶1] Shawn Uecker appeals from the trial court judgment awarding Denise Laney custody of their minor child. The trial court's custody determination is a finding of fact which will not be set aside on appeal unless it is clearly erroneous. Huesers v. Huesers, 1997 ND 33, ¶6, 560 N.W.2d 219 ; Ternes v. Ternes, 555 N.W.2d 355, 357 (N.D. 1996). We conclude the trial court's custody determination was not clearly erroneous. The judgment is affirmed under Rule 35.1(a)(2), N.D.R.App.P.[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Mary Muehlen Maring William A. Neumann Dale V. Sandstrom Herbert L. Meschke