Case Title: Disciplinary Counsel v. Antony

Citation: 2013-Ohio-2625

Docket Number: 2012-1181

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2013-06-25T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Antony, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2013-Ohio-2625.] 
 
 
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ANTONY. 
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Antony, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2013-Ohio-2625.] 
(No. 2012-1181—Submitted June 18, 2013—Decided June 25, 2013.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
____________________ 
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 
application for reinstatement on February 20, 2013, by respondent, John Peter 
Antony, Attorney Registration No. 0043520, last known business address in 
Highland Heights, Kentucky. 
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of September 6, 2012, 
wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F)(4), suspended respondent for 
a period of 90 days and ordered that he will not be reinstated to the practice of law 
in Ohio until he is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Florida, finds 
that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions 
of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). 
{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to 
the practice of law in the state of Ohio.  It is further ordered that respondent’s 
second application for reinstatement filed April 15, 2013, is moot. 
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 
of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made 
as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of 
publication. 
O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, 
FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. 
________________________