Case Title: Will v. Mill Condominium Owners' Assoc., et al.

Citation: 179 Vt. 500, 2006 VT 36, 898 A.2d 1264

Docket Number: 

State: vermont

Court: Vermont Supreme Court

Date: 2006-04-28T00:00:00Z

Document:
Will v. Mill Condominium Owners' Association (2005-019); 179 Vt. 500; 898 A.2d 1264

2006 VT 36

[Filed 28-Apr-2006]


       NOTICE:  This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under
  V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont
  Reports.  Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions,
  Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801 of
  any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes
  to press.


                                 2006 VT 36

                                No. 2005-019


  Anne M. Will                                   Supreme Court

                                                 On Appeal from
       v.                                        Windsor Superior Court


  Mill Condominium Owners' Association, et al.   November Term, 2005


  Theresa S. DiMauro, J.

  Stephen S. Ankuda of Parker & Ankuda, P.C., Springfield, for
    Plaintiff-Appellant.

  Jennifer G. Mihalich of Lynn, Thomas & Mihalich, P.C., Burlington, for
    Defendants-Appellees Mill Condominium Owners' Association, Inc., Graham,
    and McMillen.

  Robert Reis and Matthew D. Anderson of Reis, Urso & Ewald, LLP, Rutland,
    for  Defendant-Appellee Nitka.

  T. Darrah Moore of Birmingham & Moore, P.C., Ludlow, for
    Defendants-Appellees Seiple.



  PRESENT:  Reiber, C.J., Dooley, Johnson, Skoglund and Burgess, JJ.

       ¶  1.  JOHNSON, J.   Plaintiff Anne M. Will, owner of a unit in the
  Mill Condominiums, challenges the trial court's decision denying her claims
  for damages, attorneys' fees, and costs resulting from the commercially
  unreasonable foreclosure sale of Will's condominium by defendant Mill
  Condominium Owners' Association.  We affirm in part and reverse in part.
   
       ¶  2.  This is the second time this case has come before us on
  appeal.  The facts underlying the conflict between Will and the defendants
  are recited in our first decision, Will v. Mill Condo. Owners' Ass'n, 2004
  VT 22, 176 Vt. 380,