Case Title: Nicotra v. Rowe, et al.

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2000-11-01T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ALEX T. NICOTRA, § § Plaintiff Below, § Appellant, § No. 188, 2000 § v. § Court Below: Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware in and for KAREN ROWE, RICHARD § Sussex County ROWE and § C.A. No. 2023-S JAMES A. FUQUA, JR., § § Defendants Below, § Appellees. § Submitted: October 31, 2000 Decided: November 1, 2000 Before WALSH, BERGER, and STEELE, Justices. O R D E R This 1st day of November 2000, upon consideration of the briefs of the parties, the Court concludes that the Court of Chancery did not abuse its discretion in denying the appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and in dismissing appellant’s petition as frivolous. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Chancery is affirmed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: s/Joseph T. Walsh Justice