Case Title: Winter v. Dept. of Justice and Dept. of Correction

Citation: 

Docket Number: 11, 2019

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2019-05-15T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
HERMIONE K.I. WINTER, 
 
 
Petitioner Below, 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF 
JUSTICE AND THE DELAWARE 
DEPARTMENT OF 
CORRECTION, 
 
Respondents, 
Appellees. 
§ 
§ 
§  No. 11, 2019 
§ 
§  Court Below—Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware 
§   
§  C.A. No. S18M-08-023 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§ 
   
 
 
 
 
Submitted: May 10, 2019 
 
 
 
 
Decided: 
May 15, 2019 
 
Before VAUGHN, SEITZ, and TRAYNOR, Justices. 
 
 
ORDER 
After consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion to 
affirm, and the record below, it appears to the Court that: 
(1) 
The appellant, Hermione K.I. Winter, filed this appeal from the 
Superior Court’s dismissal of her petition of a writ of mandamus. The Delaware 
Department of Justice and the Delaware Department of Correction have filed a 
motion to affirm the judgment below on the ground that it is manifest on the face of 
Winter’s opening brief that her appeal is without merit.  We agree and affirm.   
(2) 
On August 27, 2018, Winter filed a two-page petition for a writ of 
mandamus in the Superior Court.  Winter, a transgender inmate at James T. Vaughn 
 
2 
Correctional Center, alleged that she was being unlawfully held in a male prison 
where there were safety and privacy concerns, as well as unspecified violations of 
her religious rights and sought an order compelling a transfer to a female facility or 
immediate release.  The respondents filed a motion to dismiss, describing the 
Department of Correction’s policies for the housing of transgender inmates and 
arguing that a mandamus action was inappropriate for a discretionary matter.  The 
Superior Court granted the motion to dismiss.  This appeal followed. 
(3) 
Winter devotes most of her opening brief to alleged violations of her 
religious rights under the Religious Land Use & Institutionalized Persons Act.  She 
also seeks gender reassignment surgery.  She did not raise these claims in the 
proceedings below and we will not address them for the first time on appeal.1  As to 
her argument that she is entitled to a writ of mandamus compelling her transfer to a 
female prison, “[a] writ of mandamus is a command that may be issued by the 
Superior Court to an inferior court, public official, or agency to compel the 
performance of a duty to which the petitioner has established a clear legal right.”2  A 
writ of mandamus will not issue to compel a discretionary act.3  Decisions regarding 
the housing of inmates and the transfer of inmates from one housing unit to another 
                                                 
1 Supr. Ct. R. 8. 
2 Clough v. State, 686 A.2d 158, 159 (Del. 1996). 
3 Darby v. New Castle Gunning Bedford Educ. Ass’n, 336 A.2d 209, 211 (Del. 1975). 
 
3 
fall within the discretion of the Department of Correction.4  Having reviewed the 
record in this case in light of the above legal principles, we conclude that the 
Superior Court’s dismissal of Winter’s petition for a writ of mandamus was proper.  
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that motion to affirm is GRANTED 
and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice 
                                                 
4 Desmond v. Phelps, 2012 WL 424891, at *2 (Del. Feb. 8, 2012).