Case Title: State ex rel. Tamco Distrib. Co. v. Indus. Comm.

Citation: 2003-Ohio-369

Docket Number: 

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2003-02-12T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as State ex rel. Tamco Distrib. Co. v. Indus. Comm., 98 Ohio St.3d 285, 2003-Ohio-369.] 
1 
 
 
THE STATE EX REL. TAMCO DISTRIBUTORS COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. 
INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. 
[Cite as State ex rel. Tamco Distrib. Co. v. Indus. Comm., 98 Ohio St.3d 285, 
2003-Ohio-369.] 
Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. 
(No. 2002-0701 — Submitted January 7, 2003 — Decided February 12, 2003.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 01AP-874. 
__________________ 
{¶1} 
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the 
opinion of the court of appeals. 
 
MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK, LUNDBERG 
STRATTON and O’CONNOR, JJ., concur. 
__________________ 
 
David R. Cook, for appellant. 
 
Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Keith D. Blosser, Assistant Attorney 
General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. 
 
Elliott, Heller, Maas, Moro & Magill Co., L.P.A., Robert J. Foley and 
Richard L. Magill, for appellee Marilyn D. Cramb. 
__________________