Case Title: State ex rel. Mead Corp. v. Indus. Comm.

Citation: 2001-Ohio-121

Docket Number: 20002190

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2001-06-06T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as State ex rel. Mead Corp. v. Indus. Comm., 91 Ohio St.3d 574, 2001-Ohio-
121.] 
1 
 
 
THE STATE EX REL. MEAD CORPORATION, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL 
COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL.; HARRIS, APPELLANT. 
[Cite as State ex rel. Mead Corp. v. Indus. Comm. (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 574.] 
Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. 
(No. 00-2190 — Submitted April 24, 2001 — Decided June 6, 2001.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-1434. 
__________________ 
 
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the 
opinion of the court of appeals. 
 
MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. 
 
DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. 
__________________ 
 
DOUGLAS, J., dissenting.  I respectfully dissent.  I would reverse the 
judgment of the court of appeals and reinstate the order of the Industrial 
Commission. 
 
RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting 
opinion. 
__________________ 
 
Thompson & Hine, L.L.P., and Robert W. Myers, for appellee. 
 
Livorno & Arnett Co., L.P.A., and John F. Livorno, for appellant. 
__________________