Case Title: Mizukami v. Don Quijote

Citation: 

Docket Number: SCPW-13-0001762

State: hawaii

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court

Date: 2013-07-11T00:00:00Z

Document:
SCPW-13-0001762 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I CAROLYN MIZUKAMI, Petitioner, vs. DON QUIJOTE (USA) CO. LTD., DTRIC INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., Respondents. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CIV. NO. 12-1-3273-12) ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.) Upon consideration of the document submitted by petitioner Carolyn Mizukami entitled “Plaintiff’s Original Proceeding for this Supreme Court of Hawai#i’s Findings of the Unconstitutionally-Applied HRS § 605-14 Unauthorized-Practice-of- Law, In-Itself & to Abrogate Fundamental Rights Secured by the HRS Chapter 551D Uniform Durable Power of Attorney Act Amongst States & in Circuit Court Civil No. 12-1-003273”, which the appellate clerk’s office filed on July 5, 2013, and which the court reviews as a petition for a writ of mandamus, and the record, it appears that petitioner has alternative means to seek the requested relief and, therefore, is not entitled to a writ of Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-13-0001762 11-JUL-2013 09:12 AM 2 mandamus. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 11, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack