Case Title: Outlaw v. Kurpis

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: hawaii

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court

Date: 2007-01-29T00:00:00Z

Document:
No. 27710
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAT'T

EnmuR wFIELD OUTAAW, formeriy wnow og)
ar rote comaanc/flarnciteneeles
Es ~ Cr
ge oO
= o
3

PETER KURPIS, Petitioner/Defendant-Appell:

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(FC-D NO. 98-150K)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CORRECTION OF ERROR,
‘INTHE ALTERNATIVE, EXTENSION OF TIME

OR,
(By: Acoba, J., for the court)
upon consideration of Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’ s

Motion for Correction of Error, or, in the Alternative, Extension
of Tine, and the attachments thereto, it appears that the filing
of an application for a writ of certiorari is measured from the
filing of the judgment on appeal, not service of the judgment on

1t further appears

appeal, and HRAP Rule 26(c) does not apply.
(Supp. 2006) does not authorize the

that HRS § 602-59(c)
appellate court to extend the ninety-day period for filing an

application for a writ of certiorari. Therefore,
IT 18 HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied.

  
     

DATED:
FOR THE COURT: é
\ SEAL
SIMEON R. ACOBA, JR. 3h
Associate Justice ee
Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, J3-

 

+ considered by Moon, C.J., Levinson,

Honolulu, Hava‘'s, February 21, 2007.