Case Title: State v. Lakman

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: hawaii

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court

Date: 2006-04-26T00:00:00Z

Document:
LAW LIBRARY

*** NOT FOR PUBLICATION ***

ee
No. 27752

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

STATE OF HAWAI'I, Plaintiff-Appellee 5

JASON M. LAKMAN, Defendant-Appellant s

anid

APPEAL FROM THE SECOND CIRCUIT COURT
(CR. NO, 05-1-0329)

 

BDI PP
(ay: Duffy, J. for the court)

Upon consideration of appellant's motion to dismiss
appeal for lack of jurisdiction, the papers in support and the
record, it appears that the sentence imposed by the circuit court
in the ganuary 4, 2006 judgment was not the final sentence
inasmuch as it left open the possibility that it may include
payment of restitution, which matter has yet to be determined.
Consequently, the January 4, 2006 judgment is not an appealable
final judgment and we lack jurisdiction. See HRS § 641-11; State
ye Kilborn, 109 Hawai'i 435, 127 P.3d 95 (App. 2005). Therefore,

17 IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to dismiss appeal
is granted and this appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate
jurisdiction.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, april 26, 2006.

James S. Tabe, FOR THE COURT:
Deputy Public Defender,
for defendant -appellant Guc oui

on the motion
Associate Justice

 

considered by: Moon, C.2., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy,
a.