Case Title: Sato v. Broderick

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: hawaii

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court

Date: 2009-07-13T00:00:00Z

Document:
LAW LIBRARY

No. 29925

 

‘THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

MELANIE SATO, Petitioner, .

  
  

THE HONORABLE MICHAEL F. BRODERICK, JUDGE OF THE’)
COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI'I,
MIKE A. TROUT, Respondents

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(FC=DA NO. 09-1-1202)

ORDER
(By: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and Recktenwald, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the petition for a writ of
mandamus filed by petitioner Melanie Sato and the papers in
support, it appears that petitioner can file a protective notice
of appeal to preserve her right to appeal and petitioner can
obtain relief from the July 2, 2009 temporary protective order at
the July 27, 2009 hearing on the motion for protective order.
Therefore, petitioner is not entitled to extraordinary relief.
See Kema v, Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204, 982 P.24 334, 338 (1999)
(A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not
issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable
right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress
adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action.).
Accordingly,

IT 18 HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, July 13, 2009.

pin
2 lO raeny arc

 

 

Poti
MAE Me ectinhS