Case Title: Carr v. Passailaigue

Citation: 

Docket Number: 2004-MO-017

State: south-carolina

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Date: 2004-04-12T00:00:00Z

Document:
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court David Carr, Appellant, v. Ernest Passailaigue, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI Appeal From Charleston County R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court Judge Memorandum Opinion No. 2004-MO-017 Heard April 7, 2004 - Filed April 12, 2004 AFFIRMED IN RESULT Chalmers Carey Johnson, of Chalmers Johnson Law Firm, of Charleston, for Appellant. Charles E. Carpenter, S. Elizabeth Brosnan, and Anthony E. Rebollo, of Richardson, Plowden, Carpenter & Robinson, P.A., of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Affirmed in result pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), and the following authorities: Issue 1: Our resolution of Issues 2 and 3 makes it unnecessary to address this issue on appeal. Issue 2: Dean v. Ruscon Corp., 321 S.C. 360, 468 S.E.2d 645 (1996). Issue 3: I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. Pleasant, 338 S.C. 406, 526 S.E.2d 716 (2000) (appellate court may review respondent's additional reasons and if convinced it is proper may rely on them, or any other reason in the record, and affirm lower court's judgment). AFFIRMED IN RESULT. TOAL, C.J., WALLER, BURNETT, PLEICONES, JJ., and Acting Justice John W. Kittredge, concur.