Case Title: Laskowski v. Dager et al.

Citation: 

Docket Number: 10, 2002

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2002-04-25T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
ANGELINE A. LASKOWSKI,
Plaintiff Below-
Appellant,
v.
LAWRENCE M. DAGER and
CAROL McCAMBRIDGE-
DAGER, husband and wife,
Defendants Below-
Appellees.
§
§
§  No. 10, 2002
§
§  Court Below—Court of Chancery
§  of the State of Delaware,
§  in and for New Castle County
§  C.A. No. 16043
§
§
§
§
§
Submitted: April 5, 2002
  Decided:
April 25, 2002
Before WALSH, HOLLAND, and BERGER, Justices.
O R D E R
This 25th day of April 2002, having carefully considered the
appellant’s opening brief, the appellees’ motion to affirm, and the record
below, we find it manifest on the face of the opening brief that the appeal is
without merit and that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis
of, and for the reasons stated in, the Court of Chancery’s well-reasoned
opinion dated December 7, 2001.  There is sufficient evidence in the record
to support the Court of Chancery’s factual findings, and the court did not err
in its application of the law to the facts.
2
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the
Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Randy J. Holland
Justice