Case Title: Felicetty v. State

Citation: 

Docket Number: 128, 2002

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2002-05-07T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
SHAWN FELICETTY,
Defendant Below-
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF DELAWARE,
Plaintiff Below-
Appellee.
§
§
§  No. 128, 2002
§
§
§  Court Below—Superior Court
§  of the State of Delaware,
§  in and for Sussex County
§  Cr. ID No. 9806003895
§
§
Submitted: April 2, 2002
  Decided:
May 7, 2002
Before WALSH, HOLLAND, and BERGER, Justices.
O R D E R
This 7th day of May 2002, upon consideration of the appellant’s
opening brief and the State’s motion to affirm, it is manifest that this matter
must be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court’s well-reasoned decision
dated March 6, 2002.  The claims raised in Felicetty’s postconviction
petition were procedurally barred under Superior Court Criminal Rule 61(i).
To the extent the issues were a refinement of issues raised by Felicetty and
rejected by this Court in an earlier appeal,* Rule 61(i)(4) bars
reconsideration of those issues. To the extent Felicetty failed to raise these
                                                 
* Felicetty v. State, 2002 WL 200967 (Del. Supr.).
2
issues in his prior appeal, Rule 61(i)(3) bars consideration of these claims.
Felicetty has failed to overcome these procedural hurdles.
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the
Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Randy J. Holland
Justice