Case Title: Disciplinary Counsel v. Brueggeman

Citation: 2021-Ohio-21

Docket Number: 

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2021-01-11T00:00:00Z

Document:
1
 
 
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BRUEGGEMAN. 
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Brueggeman, ___ Ohio St.3d ___,  
2021-Ohio-21.] 
(No. 2019-1734—Submitted January 7, 2021—Decided January 11, 2021.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
____________________ 
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 
application for reinstatement by respondent, Edward Paul Brueggeman, Attorney 
Registration No. 0029159, last known business address in Mason, Ohio. 
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of April 23, 2020, wherein 
the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent for a period 
of two years, with the final 18 months stayed on condition, finds that respondent 
has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. 
V(24). 
{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to 
the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 
of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be 
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2). 
{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Brueggeman, 160 Ohio 
St.3d 198, 2020-Ohio-1578, 155 N.E.3d 833. 
O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, 
and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. 
________________________