Case Title: In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure; Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure; New Florida Rules For Court-Appointed Alternative Dispute Resolution Neutrals

Citation: 

Docket Number: SC14-1852

State: florida

Court: Florida Supreme Court

Date: 2015-10-08T00:00:00Z

Document:
Supreme Court of Florida 
 
 
____________ 
 
No. SC14-1852 
____________ 
 
 
IN RE:  AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL 
PROCEDURE; FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE; NEW 
FLORIDA RULES FOR COURT-APPOINTED ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE 
RESOLUTION NEUTRALS. 
 
[October 8, 2015] 
 
PER CURIAM. 
 
This matter is before the Court for consideration of proposed amendments to 
the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure 
and proposed new Florida Rules for Court-Appointed Alternative Dispute 
Resolution Neutrals Regarding Dispute Resolution Processes for Which No Other 
Supreme Court Rules or Standards of Professional Conduct Exist.  We have 
jurisdiction.  See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const. 
The Supreme Court Committee on Alternative Dispute Resolution Rules and 
Policy (ADR Committee) has filed a petition proposing new Family Law Rules of 
Procedure, new Rules of Civil Procedure, and new Rules for Court-Appointed 
Alternative Dispute Resolution Neutrals Regarding Alternative Dispute Resolution 
 
- 2 - 
Processes for Which No Other Supreme Court Rules or Standards of Professional 
Conduct Exist.  Similar proposals were submitted by the ADR Committee in case 
number SC11-1454; however, the Court declined to adopt those proposals and 
referred them back to the ADR Committee for further study and consideration.   
See In re Amends. to Fla. R. Civ. P., Fla. Fam. L. R. P., New Fla. R. for Qualified 
and Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators, New Fla. R. for Other Court-
Appointed Alternative Dispute Resolution Neutrals, 104 So. 3d 1043, 1045 (Fla. 
2012).   
According to the petition, the ADR Committee received input from the 
Florida Bar Rules Committees.  The petition also states that the proposals were 
posted on the Dispute Resolution Center website from May 20, 2011, to June 8, 
2011, and the Committee received one comment.  After submission to the Court, 
the proposals were published for comment in The Florida Bar News.  Comments 
were received from several interested parties and groups, including the Family 
Law Rules Committee, the Civil Procedure Rules Committee, the Executive 
Council of the ADR Section of the Florida Bar, the Honorable Thomas McGrady, 
Chief Judge of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, the Honorable Robert E. Roundtree, Jr., 
Chief Judge of the Eighth Judicial Circuit, Attorney Robert J. Merlin, and Gregory 
Firestone, Ph.D.  The ADR Committee filed a response to the comments, and oral 
argument was heard on the Committee’s proposals on June 3, 2015.   
 
- 3 - 
We commend the ADR Committee’s careful consideration and considerable 
effort in presenting these matters to the Court and its continued work in supporting 
and encouraging the use of alternative dispute resolution in Florida courts.  
However, upon consideration of the ADR Committee’s petition, the comments 
filed and the Committee’s response thereto, and the presentations of the parties at 
oral argument, we decline to adopt the Committee’s proposals at this time.  Given 
the substantial criticism, alleged deficiencies in the proposals, and other issues 
raised at oral argument in this matter and in the comments received, we conclude 
that the time is not yet ripe for rules addressing ADR processes other than those 
already identified and governed by current court rules. 
It is so ordered.   
LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and 
PERRY, JJ., concur. 
LEWIS, J., concurs in result. 
 
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND 
IF FILED, DETERMINED.   
  
Original Proceeding – Florida Rules of Civil Procedure  
 
Judge Rodney Smith, Chair, Committee on Alternative Dispute Resolution Rules 
and Policy, Miami, Florida; Judge William David Palmer, Past Chair, Committee 
on Alternative Dispute Resolution Rules and Policy, Daytona Beach, Florida; and 
Susan Carolyn Marvin, Senior Staff Attorney, Dispute Resolution Center, 
Tallahassee, Florida, 
 
 
for Petitioner 
 
 
- 4 - 
Robert Joseph Merlin of Robert J. Merlin, P.A., Coral Gables, Florida; Chief Judge 
James T. McGrady, III, Sixth Judicial Circuit, Clearwater, Florida; Michael L. 
Emge, Senior Staff Attorney, Sixth Judicial Circuit, Saint Petersburg, Florida; 
Gregory Firestone, Ph.D., Director of Conflict Resolution Collaborative, 
University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida; Charles Cole Jeffries, Jr., Chair, 
Family Law Rules Committee, Tampa, Florida; Elizabeth Ann Blackburn, Past 
Chair, Family Law Rules Committee, Daytona Beach, Florida; John F. Harkness, 
Jr., Executive Director, Ellen H. Sloyer, Senior Rules Liaison, and Gregory A. 
Zhelesnik, Bar Staff Liaison, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida; Judge 
Jacqueline Hogan Scola, Chair, Civil Procedure Rules Committee, Miami, Florida; 
Kevin Bayly Cook, Past Chair, Civil Procedure Rules Committee, Roger Towers, 
P.A., Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida; Chief Judge Robert E. Roundtree, Jr. and 
Bridget Longridge Baker, Family Court Manager, Eighth Judicial Circuit, 
Gainesville, Florida; Michael H. Lax, Chair, Alternative Dispute Resolution 
Section of The Florida Bar, Michael H. Lax, P.A., Miami, Florida; David Robert 
Hoyle, Vice-Chair, Alternative Dispute Resolution Section of The Florida Bar, D. 
Robert Hoyle, P.A., Bradenton, Florida; and Gregory Pierce Brown of Hill Ward 
Henderson, Tampa, Florida,  
 
 
Responding with Comments