Case Title: Leight v W7879 LLC

Citation: 2016 NY Slip Op 02126

Docket Number: 

State: new-york

Court: New York Appellate Court

Date: 2016-03-24T00:00:00Z

Document:
Leight v W7879 LLC

2016 NY Slip Op 02126

Decided on March 24, 2016

Court of Appeals

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 24, 2016

No. 102 SSM 4

[*1]Douglas L. Leight, et al., Plaintiffs, John H. Masten, Appellant,
vW7879 LLC, et al., Respondents.


Submitted by Seth A. Miller, for appellant.
Submitted by Patrick K. Munson, for respondents.
Metropolitan Council on Housing, amicus curiae.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. Plaintiff John H. Masten failed to establish that his apartment, which was de-regulated in 2000 by an unchallenged order of the Division of Housing and Community Renewal, became re-regulated when he executed a renewal lease at market rate. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.
Decided March 24, 2016