Case Title: State of Florida v. Andre Luders

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: florida

Court: Florida Supreme Court

Date: 2000-04-27T00:00:00Z

Document:
Supreme Court of Florida
 
____________
No. SC96173
____________
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Petitioner,
vs.
ANDRE LUDERS,
Respondent.
[April 27, 2000]
PER CURIAM.
We have for review State v. Luders, 731 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999),
modified, No. 98-00729 (July 7, 1999)(unpublished order certifying conflict with
Peart v. State, 705 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)).  We have jurisdiction.  See
art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.  
This Court recently held in Peart v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S271 (Fla. Apr.
13, 2000), that a defendant may seek postconviction relief if he or she was not
-2-
advised of the immigration consequences of a plea.  We emphasize that all such
claims filed subsequent to our decision in Wood v. State, 750 So. 2d 592 (Fla.
1999), must be filed pursuant to a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure
3.850.  See Peart, 25 Fla. L. Weekly at S273.  Luders is approved as being
consistent with our decision in Peart.
It is so ordered.
SHAW, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
HARDING, C.J., and WELLS and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND IF
FILED, DETERMINED.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Certified
Direct Conflict of Decisions
 Fourth District - Case No.  4D98-0729 
( Broward County)
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Delia Terenzio, Bureau Chief, and Jeanine
M. Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, Florida,
for Petitioner
H. Dohn Williams, Jr., Fort Lauderdale, Florida,
for Respondent