Case Title: Disciplinary Counsel v. Cox

Citation: 2010-Ohio-2196

Docket Number: 

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2010-04-29T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Cox, 125 Ohio St.3d 1202, 2010-Ohio-2196.] 
 
 
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. COX. 
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Cox, 125 Ohio St.3d 1202, 2010-Ohio-2196.] 
(No. 2006-1906 — Submitted April 20, 2010 — Decided April 29, 2010.) 
ON PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
__________________ 
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing on 
August 5, 2009, of a petition for reinstatement by respondent, Marion N. Cox, 
Attorney Registration No. 0041495.  In accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(10)(F), 
respondent's petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of 
Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline.  The board filed its final report in 
this court on February 23, 2010, recommending that respondent be reinstated to 
the practice of law in Ohio.  No objections to the final report were filed.  Upon 
consideration thereof,  
{¶ 2} It is ordered by this court that the petition for reinstatement of 
respondent is granted and that respondent, Marion N. Cox, last known address in 
Shaker Heights, Ohio, is reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. 
{¶ 3} It is further ordered by the court that respondent be taxed the costs 
of these proceedings in the amount of $1,557.18, less the deposit of $500.00, for a 
total balance due of $1,057.18 payable, by certified check or money order, by 
respondent on or before 90 days from the date of this order.  If costs are not paid 
on or before 90 days from the date of this order, interest at the rate of 10% per 
annum will accrue until costs are paid in full.  It is further ordered that if costs are 
not paid in full on or before 90 days from the date of this order, respondent may 
be found in contempt and suspended until all costs and accrued interest are paid in 
full. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 
2 
 
{¶ 4} It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that within 90 days of 
the date of this order, respondent shall reimburse any amounts that have been 
awarded against respondent by the Clients' Security Fund pursuant to Gov.Bar R. 
VIII(7)(F).  It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that if, after the date of 
this order, the Clients' Security Fund awards any amount against respondent 
pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), respondent shall reimburse that amount to the 
Clients' Security Fund within 90 days of the notice of such award. 
{¶ 5} It is further ordered, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this 
court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of 
Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, 
number, and timeliness of filings.  All case documents are subject to Rules 44 
through 47 of the Rules of Superintendence for the Courts of Ohio, which govern 
access to court records. 
{¶ 6} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified 
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be 
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the 
costs of publication. 
{¶ 7} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Cox, 113 Ohio St.3d 
48, 2007-Ohio-979, 862 N.E.2d 514. 
PFEIFER, 
ACTING 
C.J., 
and 
LUNDBERG 
STRATTON, 
O’CONNOR, 
O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. 
The late CHIEF JUSTICE THOMAS J. MOYER did not participate in the 
decision in this case. 
______________________