Case Title: State v. Derov

Citation: 2009-Ohio-1111

Docket Number: 20080853 and 20080858

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2009-03-18T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as State v. Derov, 121 Ohio St.3d 269, 2009-Ohio-1111.] 
 
 
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. DEROV, APPELLEE. 
[Cite as State v. Derov, 121 Ohio St.3d 269, 2009-Ohio-1111.] 
Judgment of the court of appeals reversed in part and appeal dismissed in part as 
improvidently accepted — Notice of certified conflict dismissed for want of 
a conflict. 
(Nos. 2008-0853 and 2008-0858 — Submitted February 4, 2009 — Decided 
March 18, 2009.) 
APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County, 
No. 07 MA 71, 176 Ohio App.3d 43, 2008-Ohio-1672. 
__________________ 
{¶ 1} The record in the trial court concerning the portable breathalyzer 
test used in this case is not sufficient to support either the statements in the 
opinion of the court of appeals regarding the use of the portable breathalyzer and 
the value of its test results or the judgment that the trial court should not have 
considered the results of the portable breath test.  Accordingly, that portion of the 
judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the 
court of appeals for further proceedings. 
{¶ 2} In view of the foregoing disposition of appellant’s Proposition of 
Law No. II, the notice of certified conflict is dismissed for want of a conflict. 
{¶ 3} Sua sponte, the appeal is dismissed as to appellant’s Proposition of 
Law Nos. I and III as having been improvidently accepted. 
{¶ 4} The opinion of the court of appeals may not be cited as authority 
except by the parties inter se. 
 
MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, and 
CUPP, JJ., concur. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 
2 
 
PFEIFER and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent in part and would dismiss the cause 
as having been improvidently accepted. 
__________________ 
 
Paul J. Gains, Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney, and Ralph M. 
Rivera, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. 
 
Robert C. Kokor, for appellee. 
 
 
Lamkin, Van Eman, Trimble, Beals & Dougherty, L.L.C., and Timothy L. 
Van Eman, urging reversal for amicus curiae Mothers Against Drunk Driving. 
Joseph R. Macejko, Youngstown City Prosecutor, urging reversal for 
amicus curiae city of Youngstown. 
Richard Cordray, Attorney General, Benjamin C. Mizer, Solicitor General, 
and Jason Patrick Small, Deputy Solicitor, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio 
Attorney General. 
Timothy Huey; and Atway & Cochran, L.L.C., and Scott R. Cochran, 
urging affirmance for amicus curiae Ohio Association of Criminal Defense 
Lawyers. 
______________________