Case Title: Halko v. Cobb

Citation: 

Docket Number: 410, 2001

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2001-09-13T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
MARITA HALKO, individually and §
as guardian ad litem of her minor,
§
son, KARL T. HALKO, and KARL §
T. HALKO, individually,
§
§
No. 410, 2001
Defendant Below-
§
Appellant,
§
Court Below—Superior Court
§
of the State of Delaware, in
v.
§
and for New Castle County
§
C.A. No. 99C-01-213
LINDA K. COBB, as guardian ad
§
litem for her minor daughter
§
JACLYN K. COBB,
§
§
Plaintiff Below-
§
Appellee.
§
Submitted: September 6, 2001
Decided:
September 13, 2001
Before WALSH, BERGER and STEELE, Justices.
O R D E R
This 13th day of August 2001, it appears to the Court that:
(1)
The defendants below, Marita Halko and Karlo Halko, have
petitioned this Court, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 42, to appeal from
an interlocutory ruling of the Superior Court issued August 3, 2001.  The
Superior Court’s ruling denied the defendants’ motion for summary
judgment.  The defendants had argued that the plaintiff’s claim was barred
by the applicable statute of limitations.
2
(2)
On September 4, 2001, the Superior Court denied the
defendants’ application to certify an interlocutory appeal to this Court.
(3)
Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the
sound discretion of this Court and are granted only in extraordinary cases.
(4)
In the exercise of its discretion, this Court has concluded that
the application for interlocutory review does not meet the requirements of
Supreme Court Rule 42(b) and should be refused.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the within
interlocutory appeal is REFUSED.
BY THE COURT:
Myron T. Steele                
           
           
Justice