Case Title: Drum v. Shaull Equipment and Supply (Summary Disposition)

Citation: 

Docket Number: 687WAL2000

State: pennsylvania

Court: Pennsylvania Supreme Court

Date: 2001-05-14T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT JAMES T. DRUM and LINDA I. DRUM, HIS WIFE, Respondents v. SHAULL EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY COMPANY, LARRY BROWN and MARLIN PENTZ, Petitioners : : : : : : : : : : No. 687 WAL 2000 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court. ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2001, the petition for allowance of appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the issue of whether the Superior Court’s analysis was in accord with the standard enunciated in Harman v. Borah, 756 A.2d 1116 (Pa. 2000). Furthermore, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED and the matter REMANDED for reconsideration in light of the Harman decision. Mr. Justice Thomas G. Saylor dissents.