Case Title: State v. Kalili

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: hawaii

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court

Date: 2006-06-14T00:00:00Z

Document:
*** NOT FOR PUBLICATION
No. 27617

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

 

y

STATE OF HAWAI'I, Plaintif£-Appelle¢

 

 

  

HY war sun

z
Pp
c

JAMES DAVID KALILI, Defendant-Appellant _
———— i

APPEAL FROM THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT ©
(CR. NOS. 05-1-0006K and 05-1-0087K)

 

"

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
(By: Nakayama, J., for the court!)

Upon review of the record, it appears that the
August 18, 2005 judgments were appealable under HRS § 641-11 by

notices of appeal filed by the original thirty-day deadline of

 

September 19, 2005 or by an extended deadline not exceeding
thirty days past September 19, 2005, which was October 19, 2005.
See HRAP 4(b) (17 HRAP 4(b) (5) ("(T]he circuit . . . court may .
| extend the time for filing a notice of appeal for a period not
to exceed 30 days from the expiration of [the original 30-day

deadiine]."). Appellant’s motions for extensions of time to

appeal, though not acted upon, were filed on Novenber 17, 2005,
after expiration of the extension period, and were of no effect.
‘the notices of appeal filed on Novenber 17, 2005 were untimely.
our recognized exceptions to late criminal appeals do not apply

in this case. Thus, we lack jurisdiction. See Grattafior:

considered by! Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Accba, and Duffy, 33.
*** NOT FOR PUBLICATION ***
State, 79 Hawai'i 10, 13, 697 P.2d 937, 940 (1995) ("[C]ompliance
with the requirement of the timely filing of a notice of appeal,
is jurisdictional, and we must dismiss an appeal on our own
motion if we lack jurisdiction.”). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed for
lack of appellate jurisdiction.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, June 14, 2006.
FOR THE COURT:

Peete C1. Name omer

Associate Justice