Case Title: Young v. State

Citation: 

Docket Number: 2004-MO-032

State: south-carolina

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Date: 2004-06-28T00:00:00Z

Document:
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Marvin Young, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI Appeal From Spartanburg County Gary E. Clary, Trial Judge J. Derham Cole, Post-Conviction Relief Judge Memorandum Opinion No. 2004-MO-032 Submitted June 14, 2004 - Filed June 28, 2004 DISMISSED Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, S.C. Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Allen Bullard, and Assistant Attorney General Douglas Leadbitter, all of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari from the denial of his application for post-conviction relief (PCR). Because there is sufficient evidence to support the PCR judge's finding that petitioner did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to a direct appeal, we grant certiorari, dispense with further briefing, and proceed with a review of the direct appeal issue pursuant to Davis v. State, 288 S.C. 290, 342 S.E.2d 60 (1986). The direct appeal issue is dismissed under Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted. DISMISSED. TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, BURNETT and PLEICONES, JJ., concur.