Case Title: Thompson v. State (Per Curiam)

Citation: 2013 Ark. 312

Docket Number: 

State: arkansas

Court: Arkansas Supreme Court

Date: 2013-09-05T00:00:00Z

Document:
Cite as 2013 Ark. 312 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-13-438 EDWARD THOMPSON APPELLANT V. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE Opinion Delivered September 5, 2013 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A BELATED BRIEF MOTION GRANTED. PER CURIAM Appellant Edward Thompson, by and through his attorney Patrick J. Benca, has filed a motion to file belated brief, and seeks an extension of time for a period of forty-five days in which to file the brief. This court appointed Patrick J. Benca to be appellant’s counsel on June 20, 2013. Appellant’s brief was due to be filed on July 30, 2013. The brief was not filed by that date, and no motion to file a belated brief was filed by counsel. Mr. Benca filed this motion on August 9, 2013, requesting the he be allowed to file a belated brief and for a forty-five-day extension from the original due date. This court will accept a criminal appellant’s belated brief to prevent an appeal from being aborted. Holt v. State, 2011 Ark. 213 (per curiam). Good cause must be shown to grant the motion. See Strom v. State, 356 Ark. 224, 147 S.W.3d 689 (2004) (per curiam) (holding that appellate counsel’s admitted failure to timely file the brief constituted good cause to grant the motion for belated brief). Here, it is clear that counsel’s failure to comply with our rules resulted in the untimely Cite as 2013 Ark. 312 filing of appellant’s brief and, thus, constitutes good cause for granting the motion. Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion to file a belated brief and grant a final extension of forty-five days from the original due date for filing appellant’s brief. A copy of this order will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. Motion granted. Patrick J. Benca, for appellant. No response. 2