Case Title: Miller v. Midwestern Indemn. Co.

Citation: 1997-Ohio-294

Docket Number: 19960803

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 1997-01-29T00:00:00Z

Document:
MILLER ET AL., APPELLEES, V. MIDWESTERN INDEMNITY COMPANY, APPELLANT. 
1 
[Cite as Miller v. Midwestern Indemn. Co. (1997), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] 
2 
Appellate procedure -- Supreme Court jurisdiction -- Actual conflict 
3 
between appellate districts on rule of law must exist before 
4 
certification of conflict is proper. 
5 
 
(No. 96-803 -- Submitted December 11, 1996 -- Decided January 29, 
6 
1997.) 
7 
 
CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 
8 
15360. 
9 
__________ 
10 
 
Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley & Howley and William H. Baughman, 
11 
Jr., for appellant. 
12 
__________ 
13 
 
Sua sponte, cause dismissed as having been improvidently certified 
14 
as a conflict case.  Whitelock v. Gilbane Bldg. Co. (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 
15 
594, 613 N.E.2d 1032.  There is no conflict between the appellate districts 
16 
because the controlling law is stated in Harasyn v. Normandy Metals, Inc. 
17 
(1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 173, 551 N.E.2d 962. 
18 
 
2
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and 
1 
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. 
2 
 
3