Case Title: Lum v. City and County of Honolulu

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: hawaii

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court

Date: 2005-11-25T00:00:00Z

Document:
Lawuie:

 

No. 27193

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAT'T

ons

Plaintiff-Appellant

 

SUZTE LUM,

 

CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, a government entity,
Defendant~Appellee

and

JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 1-10; DOE PARTNERSHIPS,
CORPORATIONS and/or OTHER ENTITIES 1-10, Defendants

and

CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU,
Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee

VERIZON HAWAII, INC. and STANDARD ELECTRIC,
Third-party Defendants
APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT

(CIV. NO, 02-1-1047)

INC.,

ORDER

(By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.)
Upon consideration of Defendant-Appellee City and
county of Honolulu's motion to dismiss the appeal of Plaintift-
Appellant Suzie Lum due to Appellant's failure to file an opening
brief, the papers in support, and the records and files herein,
it appears Appellant failed to file an opening brief as required

by HRAP Rule 28(b). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is
granted, and this appeal is dismissed pursuant to HRAP Rule 30.
‘The parties shall bear their own appellate fees and costs.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, November 25, 2005.

Richard D, Lewatlen,
Deputy Corporation Counsel, G
for. defendent appellee
én the notion
2iDhcteriae—
Deseates Lille frr0.

-

ene east