Case Title: State ex rel. Hughley v. McMonagle

Citation: 2009-Ohio-1703

Docket Number: 20082262

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2009-04-16T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as State ex rel. Hughley v. McMonagle, 121 Ohio St.3d 536, 2009-Ohio-1703.] 
 
 
THE STATE EX REL. HUGHLEY, APPELLANT, v. MCMONAGLE,  
JUDGE, APPELLEE. 
[Cite as State ex rel. Hughley v. McMonagle, 
 121 Ohio St.3d 536, 2009-Ohio-1703.] 
Mandamus to compel resentencing denied — Adequate remedy in the ordinary 
course of law. 
(No. 2008-2262 — Submitted April 8, 2009 — Decided April 16, 2009.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, 
No. 92071, 2008-Ohio-5882. 
__________________ 
 
Per Curiam. 
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the 
petition of appellant, Kevin Hughley, for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, 
Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Judge Timothy McMonagle, to 
resentence him in two criminal cases.  Hughley “has or had adequate remedies in 
the ordinary course of law, e.g., appeal and postconviction relief, for review of 
any alleged sentencing error.”  State ex rel. Jaffal v. Calabrese, 105 Ohio St.3d 
440, 2005-Ohio-2591, 828 N.E.2d 107, ¶ 5.  In fact, Hughley was ultimately 
successful in raising this claim in his direct appeal from these convictions.  See 
State v. Hughley, Cuyahoga App. No. 90323, 2008-Ohio-6146, ¶ 37-41.  Insofar 
as Hughley appears to claim that he is entitled to be released from prison, habeas 
corpus, instead of mandamus, is the appropriate action.  State ex rel. Gordon v. 
Murphy, 112 Ohio St.3d 329, 2006-Ohio-6572, 859 N.E.2d 928, ¶ 5. 
Judgment affirmed. 
 
MOYER, 
C.J., 
and 
PFEIFER, 
LUNDBERG 
STRATTON, 
O’CONNOR, 
O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 
2 
__________________ 
 
Kevin Hughley, pro se. 
 
William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and James E. 
Moss, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. 
______________________