Case Title: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McNeff

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: hawaii

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court

Date: 2007-11-20T00:00:00Z

Document:
No. 26539

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAT'T

 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner

vs. i

92 40M tang

CYNTHIA KAY McNEFF, Respondent

(ope 04-036-8016) ai

SI

ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

(By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.)
Upon consideration of Respondent cynthia Kay MeNeff"s
petition for reinstatement to the practice of law, Chief
Disciplinary Counsel's affidavit regarding reinstatement, and the
record and files in this case, it appears that Respondent McNert
has complied with requirenents of Rule 2.17(b) of the Rules of
"1 (RSCH) and has paid

 

the Suprene Court of the State of Hawa
court-ordered costs, but, as Respondent McNeff readily admits,
did not comply with the requirements of RSCH 2.16(d). Respondent
NeNeff is adnonished that she is obliged to know the court rules,
but we will not deny reinstatement when no harm has resulted from
the failure to comply with RSCH 2.16(d). Therefore,

BP IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Cynthia Kay McNeff
is reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Hawai'i and

may resume the practice of law upon payment of all required

 
registration fees. See RSCH 17, This order is effective upon

entry.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, November 20, 2007.

cynthia Kay MeNefe,
reopondent, on the O

petition.

carole R. Richelieu, Chief Bey Lacenae~

Disciplinary Counsel, for

petitioner, on the s, Cee

affidavit.