Case Title: Brady-Fray v. Toledo Edison Co.

Citation: 2004-Ohio-3591

Docket Number: 20031443

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2004-07-21T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as Brady-Fray v. Toledo Edison Co., 102 Ohio St.3d 1244, 2004-Ohio-3591.] 
 
 
BRADY-FRAY, ADMR., APPELLEE, v. TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY ET AL., 
APPELLANTS. 
[Cite as Brady-Fray v. Toledo Edison Co., 102 Ohio St.3d 1244, 2004-Ohio-
3591.] 
Appeal dismissed as improvidently accepted. 
(No. 2003-1443 — Submitted June 8, 2004 — Decided July 21, 2004.) 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, No. L-02-1260, 2003-Ohio-
3422. 
__________________ 
{¶1} 
The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently 
accepted. 
 
MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR 
and O’DONNELL, JJ., concur. 
 
PFEIFER, J., dissents and would affirm. 
__________________ 
 
Blumenstiel, Huhn, Adams & Evans, L.L.C., and J.B. Blumenstiel; Kolb 
& Heban and Richard Kolb, for appellee. 
 
Roetzel & Andress, L.P.A., Denise M. Hasbrook, Alisa L. Wright and 
Brad A. Rimmel, for appellant Toledo Edison Company. 
 
Baran, Piper, Tarkowsky, Fitzgerald & Theis Co., L.P.A., and Donald E. 
Theis, for appellant Asplundh Tree Expert Company. 
 
Botros, Kollin & Schulte, L.L.C., Richard W. Schulte and Stephen D. 
Behnke, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers. 
 
Calfee, Halter & Griswold, L.L.P., Thomas I. Michals and Mark L. 
Belleville, urging reversal for amici curiae Columbus Southern Power Company, 
Ohio Power Company, Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc., Cleveland Electric 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 
2 
Illuminating Company, Ohio Edison Company, Dayton Power & Light Company, 
and Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company. 
__________________