Case Title: Batson v. Coastal Res. Comm'n

Citation: 

Docket Number: 94A22

State: north-carolina

Court: North Carolina Supreme Court

Date: 2023-10-20T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 94A22 Filed 20 October 2023 HOLLIS L. BATSON and CAROL D. BATSON; LAWRENCE F. BALDWIN and ELIZABETH C. BALDWIN; BALDWIN-BATSON OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC. v. COASTAL RESOURCES COMMISSION and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 282 N.C. App. 1 (2022), vacating an order entered on 23 September 2020 by Judge Charles H. Henry in Superior Court, Carteret County, and remanding the case. Heard in the Supreme Court on 20 September 2023. I. Clark Wright Jr. for petitioner-appellees. Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Mary L. Lucasse, Special Deputy Attorney General, for respondent-appellant Coastal Resources Commission. No brief for respondent-appellee North Carolina Department of Transportation. PER CURIAM. Justice DIETZ did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See City of Charlotte v. Univ. Fin. Props., LLC, 373 N.C. 325 (2020) (per curiam) (affirming by an equally divided vote a Court of Appeals BATSON V. COASTAL RES. COMM’N Opinion of the Court -2- decision without precedential value). AFFIRMED.