Case Title: IRET Properties v. Tano

Citation: 

Docket Number: 20130359

State: north-dakota

Court: North Dakota Supreme Court

Date: 2014-06-18T00:00:00Z

Document:
IRET Properties v. Tano  Court Description: Order denying motion to vacate or set aside default judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2014 ND 112 IRET Properties, a North Dakota, Limited Partnership, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Dr. Benoit Tano and Fatima Trigui Tano, Defendants and Appellants No. 20130359 Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Lawrence E. Jahnke, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Donald T. Campbell (argued), 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 2300, Minneapolis, MN 55402; for plaintiff and appellee. Benoit Tano (argued) and Fatima T. Tano (appeared), self-represented, 210 Marcou Road, Onalaska, WI 54650; defendants and appellants. IRET Properties v. TanoNo. 20130359 Per Curiam. [¶1] Dr. Benoit Tano and Fatima T. Tano appeal from a district court order denying their motion to vacate or set aside default judgment. On appeal, the Tanos argue the district court abused its discretion in failing to find excusable neglect existed because they were unable to obtain legal representation in spite of their diligent efforts. Failure to obtain legal representation does not amount to excusable neglect under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1). See State v. $33,000 U.S. Currency, 2008 ND 96, 748 N.W.2d 420. All other issues the Tanos raised were without merit. We summarily affirm the district court order under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Lisa Fair McEvers Carol Ronning Kapsner Dale V. Sandstrom Daniel J. Crothers