Case Title: Disciplinary Counsel v. Linick

Citation: 2000-Ohio-320

Docket Number: 

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2000-03-06T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Linick, 88 Ohio St.3d 1228, 2000-Ohio-320.] 
 
 
 
 
 
1
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. LINICK. 
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Linick (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 1228.] 
(No. 98-1241 — Submitted and decided March 6, 2000.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
 
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for 
reinstatement by respondent, David Irving Morris Linick, Attorney Registration No. 
0009026, last known address in Beachwood, Ohio. 
 
The court coming now to consider its order of February 10, 1999, wherein the 
court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year, 
finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions 
of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).  Therefore, 
 
IT IS ORDERED by this court that David Irving Morris Linick be and hereby is 
reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of 
this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided 
for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. 
 
For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Linick (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 489, 705 
N.E.2d 667. 
 
 
2
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG 
STRATTON, JJ., concur.