Case Title: Kahooilihala v. Hifo

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: hawaii

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court

Date: 2006-03-29T00:00:00Z

Document:
wo. 27834
Zeit
IN THE SUPRENE COURT OF THE STATE OF HAMAR RS

Hd 62 By soaz

|

JOHN F. KAHOOTLIHALA, DOREEN K, KAHOOILIM
and JOHN K. MORRIS, Petitioners

823]

‘THE HONORABLE EDEN ELIZABETH HIFO and KAWATAHA’O CHURCH,
by and through Its Board of Trustees, Respondents

og

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

 

DER DENYING PI
(By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the petition for a writ of

mandamus filed by petitioners John F. Kahooilihala, Doreen K.
Kahooilinala and John K. Morris, the papers in support and the
record, it appears that the actions of the respondent judge are
reviewable on appeal from a judgment entered in Civil No.

03+1-0166, petitioners will have a remedy by way of appeal fron
any adverse judgment and a writ of mandamus is not intended to

take the place of an appeal. Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of

mandamus is denied without prejudice to any remedy petitioners

may have by way of appeal.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i,

March 29, 2006.

Wayne M. Sakai,
Michiro Twanaga,
and Daniel M. Chen
for petitioners on
the writ