Case Title: Earl L. Newsome v. State of Florida

Citation: 

Docket Number: SC00-633

State: florida

Court: Florida Supreme Court

Date: 2001-05-31T00:00:00Z

Document:
Supreme Court of Florida
 
____________
No. SC00-633
____________
EARL L. NEWSOME
Petitioner,
vs.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
[May 31, 2001]
LEWIS, J.
We have for review Newsome v. State, 779 So. 2d 351 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). 
We have jurisdiction.  See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
We vacate the decision of the district court and remand for reconsideration
upon application of our decisions in Grant v. State, 770 So. 2d 655 (Fla. 2000);
State v. Cotton, 769 So. 2d 345 (Fla. 2000); McKnight v. State, 769 So. 2d 1039
(Fla. 2000); and Ellis v. State, 762 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 2000).
It is so ordered.
-2-
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.
QUINCE, J., dissents.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND
IF FILED, DETERMINED.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - 
Certified Direct Conflict
Second District - Case No. 2D99-1530
 
(Pinellas County)
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public
Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, Florida,
for Petitioner
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant
Attorney General, Chief of Criminal Law, and Anne Sheer Weiner, Assistant
Attorney General, Tampa, Florida,
for Respondent