Case Title: Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v. Derivan

Citation: 1998-Ohio-546

Docket Number: 19972259

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 1998-11-24T00:00:00Z

Document:
BUTLER COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. DERIVAN. 
[Cite as Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v. Derivan (1998), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] 
(No. 97-2259 — Submitted and decided November 24, 1998.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
 
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 
application for reinstatement by respondent H.T. Derivan, a.k.a. Hubert Thomas 
Derivan, Attorney Registration No. 0006092, last known business address in 
Middletown, Ohio. 
 
The court coming now to consider its order of April 1, 1998, wherein the 
court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six 
months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with 
the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).  Therefore, 
 
IT IS ORDERED by this court that H.T. Derivan, a.k.a. Hubert Thomas 
Derivan, be and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified 
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be 
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs 
of publication. 
 
For earlier case, see Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v. Derivan (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 
300, 691 N.E.2d 256. 
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and 
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.