Case Title: In re Branack Â

Citation: 

Docket Number: S060976

State: oregon

Court: Oregon Supreme Court

Date: 2013-02-07T00:00:00Z

Document:
Filed:  February 7, 2013 
 
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON 
 
Inquiry Concerning a Judge 
 
Re:  THE HONORABLE TIMOTHY BARNACK, 
 
Accused. 
 
(CJFD No. 12-24; SC S060976) 
 
 
En Banc 
 
 
On review of the Commission on Judicial Fitness and Disability Stipulation to 
Facts and Consent to Censure.  
 
 
Filed January 9, 2013. 
 
 
The Honorable Patricia Sullivan, Chair, Oregon Commission on Judicial Fitness 
and Disability, submitted the stipulation. 
 
 
PER CURIAM 
 
The accused is censured. 
 
1 
 
 
PER CURIAM 
1 
 
 
This is a proceeding to inquire into the conduct of a circuit court judge.  
2 
ORS 1.410 establishes the Commission on Judicial Fitness and Disability (Commission), 
3 
and ORS 1.420 to ORS 1.430 set out procedures by which the Commission may 
4 
investigate any complaint concerning the conduct of a judge.  Those procedures permit 
5 
the Commission and a judge who is the subject of a complaint to enter into a stipulation 
6 
as to the facts and the appropriate sanction.  ORS 1.420(1)(c); ORS 1.430(2).  One 
7 
permissible sanction is censure by this court.  ORS 1.430(2); see also Or Const, Art VII 
8 
(Amended), § 8(1)(e) (authorizing censure by the Supreme Court as sanction for violation 
9 
of rule of judicial conduct).  In this proceeding, the Commission and the accused, the 
10 
Honorable Timothy Barnack, a judge of the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for 
11 
Jackson County, have agreed to a Stipulation of Facts and Consent to Censure 
12 
(stipulation), in which the accused has stipulated that he engaged in conduct that violated 
13 
the Oregon Code of Judicial Conduct JR 1-101(A) (judge shall observe high standards of 
14 
conduct so that integrity, impartiality, and independence of the judiciary are preserved) 
15 
and JR 1-101(C) (judge shall not engage in conduct that reflects adversely on the judge's 
16 
character, competence, temperament, or fitness to serve as a judge). 
17 
 
 
We set out the stipulation in pertinent part: 
18 
 
 
"The accused stipulates as follows: 
19 
 
"1.  If a contested hearing was held in this matter, clear, cogent and 
20 
convincing evidence would be presented sufficient to establish the facts that 
21 
follow; 
22 
 
"2.  At all material times herein, the accused was a judge on the 
23 
 
2 
Circuit Court in Jackson County, State of Oregon. 
1 
 
"3.  In October 2011, defendant Richard Lee Taylor was convicted 
2 
of 21 sex crimes including five counts of using a child in a display of 
3 
sexually explicit conduct, one count of sexual abuse in the first degree, one 
4 
count of sodomy in the second degree, three counts of encouraging child 
5 
sexual abuse in the first degree, and three counts of encouraging child 
6 
sexual abuse in the second degree. 
7 
 
"4.  Taylor's victims were two 12 year old boys.  The evidence 
8 
included about 30 video recordings showing Taylor sexually abusing the 
9 
boys.  The recordings were so disturbing that jurors thanked Judge Barnack 
10 
for stopping some of the video shown during the three day trial.  Several 
11 
jurors cried.  Three jurors asked Judge Barnack whether there was 
12 
counseling available to them. 
13 
 
"5.  On January 21, 2012, Judge Barnack sentenced Taylor to 21 life 
14 
sentences in prison without the possibility of parole.  Taylor declined to 
15 
comment during his sentencing when asked by the judge if he wished to do 
16 
so. 
17 
 
"6.  Judge Barnack referred to Taylor as a 'piece of shit,' repeatedly 
18 
asked Taylor if he wanted to salvage his soul, commented that community 
19 
members might ask why Taylor isn't 'hanging from a tree' and that he 
20 
personally hopes that Taylor rots in prison. 
21 
 
"7.  Judge Barnack, like the jurors, says he was traumatized from 
22 
viewing the videos of the abuse. 
23 
 
"8.  Judge Barnack acknowledges he lost control of his emotions 
24 
when Taylor declined to speak at his sentencing.  Judge Barnack felt Taylor 
25 
evidenced an indifferent and unsympathetic attitude towards his victims, 
26 
one of whom was in the courtroom.  Judge Barnack acknowledges that his 
27 
comments were inappropriate. 
28 
 
"9.  After sentencing, Judge Barnack sent an email to the other 
29 
Jackson County Circuit Court Judges apologizing for his remarks at the 
30 
sentencing of Taylor.  Judge Barnack sought counseling from more 
31 
experienced judges regarding how best to manage emotionally charged 
32 
courtroom situations.  Furthermore, Judge Barnack has adopted procedures 
33 
such as a prepared script for sentencing to ensure that such behavior is not 
34 
repeated." 
35 
 
 
Pursuant to ORS 1.430(2), the court has reviewed the stipulation of facts 
36 
 
3 
and the disciplinary action to which the accused has consented.  The court approves the 
1 
consent to censure. 
2 
 
 
The accused is censured. 
3