Case Title: Marn v. Marks

Citation: 

Docket Number: 29693

State: hawaii

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court

Date: 2009-03-25T00:00:00Z

Document:
LAW LIBRARY

No. 29693

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

 

 

   

ALEXANDER Y. NARN, Petitioner, 3
“ fe E
THE HONORABLE VICTORIA S. MARKS, suDGE OF THE Gu@IT
COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWA! ss = oC
unvegt. NAR, JR.) JANES Hat. DUM, Succesese TELBtee op
Oe the’ annabenie 4. buon Brust, Dated June 16, gel
ind Thiouns E. HAYES, Receiver, Respondents Oh

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(CIVIL Nos, 98-4706, 98-5371, 07-1-0565)

 

ORDER
(By: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, 3J., and
Circuit Judge Hara, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of the petition for a writ of
mandamus and prohibition filed on March 11, 2009 by petitioner
Alexander Y. Marn and the papers in support, it appears that
petitioner's claim that the respondent judge improperly
authorized the interim payments of taxes, attorney's fees, and
expenses is not clear and indisputable. The April 3, 2008, June
5, 2008, September 16, 2008, and December 22, 2008 orders are
reviewable on appeal from final judgments entered in Civil Nos.
98-4706, 98-5371, and 07-1-0565. Thus, petitioner is not
entitled to a writ of mandamus and prohibition. See Kena v.
Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999) (A
writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is an extraordinary renedy

that will not issue unless the petitioner demon

 

ates a clear
and indisputable

 

nt to relief and a lack of alternative means
to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested

action.) .
It further appears that the March 11, 2009 petition

cannot be treated as an application for a writ of

 

certiorari to

 

review the intermediate court of appea!

 

dismissal orders filed

in Nos, 29421 and 29448 inasmuch as the p

 

 

the requirements of HRS § (Supp. 2008) and HRAP 40.
‘Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of

mandamus and prohibition is denied.

 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for expedited
review is denied.

DATED:

 

Honolulu, Hawai'S, March 25, 2009.

Tf

Seales Crecente

NS
Bune trae