Case Title: Nur v. State

Citation: 

Docket Number: 20170349

State: north-dakota

Court: North Dakota Supreme Court

Date: 2018-02-22T00:00:00Z

Document:
Nur v. State  Court Description: 40 Order denying defendant's application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (6). IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2018 ND 40 Ibrahim Hassan Nur, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee No. 20170349 Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven L. Marquart, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND 58501, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief. Tracy E. Hines (argued), Assistant State's Attorney, and Tristan J. Van de Streek (on brief), Assistant State's Attorney, Fargo, ND 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee. Nur v. StateNo. 20170349 Per Curiam. [¶1] Ibrahim Hassan Nur appeals from the district court's order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Nur argues he did not voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waive his right to counsel, and he argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel. The district court did not err in summarily denying Nur's application for post-conviction relief for misuse of process on the issue of his waiver to the right to counsel. Also, the district court did not err in denying Nur's application for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel and its findings of fact were not clearly erroneous. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (6). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jon J. Jensen Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte