Case Title: AWH Orlando Member, LLC v. REJV5 AWH Orlando, LLC, et al.

Citation: 

Docket Number: 78, 2018

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2018-03-26T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
AWH ORLANDO MEMBER, LLC, a  § 
 
  
Delaware limited liability company, 
§ 
No. 78, 2018 
 
§  
 
 
Defendant Below, 
§ 
Court Below—Court of Chancery of    
 
Appellant, 
§ 
the State of Delaware 
 
 
 
§ 
  
 
v. 
§ 
C.A. No. 2017-0708 
 
 
§ 
 
REJV5 AWH ORLANDO, LLC, a 
§ 
Delaware limited liability company, 
§ 
 
 
 
§ 
 
Plaintiff Below,  
§  
 
Appellee, 
§  
 
 
§  
 
and 
§ 
 
 
§ 
 
AWH ORLANDO HOLDING, LLC, a § 
Delaware limited liability company, 
§ 
 
 
§ 
 
Nominal Defendant Below, 
§ 
 
Appellee. 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: March 1, 2018 
 
 
 
 
Decided: 
March 26, 2018 
 
Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices. 
 
O R D E R 
 
The appellant seeks interlocutory review of certain rulings that do not entirely 
resolve the case.  In a detailed letter opinion, the Court of Chancery explained why 
interlocutory review is not required to protect the appellant from irreparable injury 
and why the costs of interlocutory review outweigh the potential benefits.1   
                                          
 
1 REJV5 AWH Orlando, LLC v. AWH Orlando Member, LLC, 2018 WL 1109650 (Del. Chan. Feb. 
28, 2018). 
2 
 
 
Interlocutory review under Supreme Court Rule 42 is addressed to the sound 
discretion of the Court.2  In this case, we agree with the Court of Chancery’s 
reasoning, in its February 28, 2018 letter opinion, that Rule 42(b)’s principles and 
criteria do not weigh in favor of interlocutory review. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the interlocutory appeal is 
REFUSED.  
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT:  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chief Justice  
 
                                          
 
2 Del. Supr. Ct. R. 42(d)(v).