Case Title: Kinzley v. Kinzley

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: north-dakota

Court: North Dakota Supreme Court

Date: 2001-05-07T00:00:00Z

Document:
Kinzley v. Kinzley  Kinzley v. Kinzley, 2001 ND 89, 629 N.W.2d 585 [Go to Documents]Filed May 7, 2001[Download as WordPerfect]IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA2001 ND 89 David Kinzley, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Sindy Kinzley, n/k/a Sindy Meadows, Defendant and Appellant No. 20000277 Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Gail H. Hagerty, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. LaRoy Baird III of LaRoy Baird, P.C., P.O. Box 913, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-0913, for defendant and appellant. Carol K. Larson of Pringle & Herigstad, P.C., P.O. Box 1000, Minot, N.D. 58702-1000, for plaintiff and appellee. Kinzley v. Kinzley No. 20000277 Per Curiam. [¶1] Sindy Kinzley appealed from a divorce judgment. She argued the trial court erred in allowing the parties' children to testify in camera and in distributing the parties' marital property. We conclude the trial court's distribution of the parties' marital estate is not clearly erroneous, and the court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the children to testify in camera. [¶2] We summarily affirm the trial court's judgment under Rule 35.1(a)(2) and (4), N.D.R.App.P. [¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. William A. Neumann Mary Muehlen Maring Carol Ronning Kapsner Robert W. Holte, D.J. [¶4] The Honorable Robert W. Holte, D.J., sitting in place of Sandstrom, J., disqualified.