Case Title: Peterson v. Pierce

Citation: 

Docket Number: 20130164

State: north-dakota

Court: North Dakota Supreme Court

Date: 2013-11-21T00:00:00Z

Document:
Peterson v. Pierce  Court Description: In a dispute over a lost rental payment, the judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2013 ND 198 Carrie Peterson, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Mara Pierce, and all others in possession, Defendants Mara Pierce Appellant No. 20130164 Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Wickham Corwin, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Carrie Peterson, self-represented, 3226 13th Ave. S., Fargo, ND 58103, plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Ann E. Miller (argued), Tyler S. Carlson (on brief), and Krista L. Andrews (on brief), P.O. Box 10247, Fargo, ND 58106-0247, for defendant and appellant. Peterson v. PierceNo. 20130164 Per Curiam. [¶1] Mara Pierce appealed from a money judgment entered by the district court following an eviction hearing. Pierce argues the district court erred in concluding she did not make an effective rent payment by placing $1,400 cash in her landlord's unsecured mailbox. The district court found Pierce placed the cash in her landlord's mailbox, but that the landlord did not receive it. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Dale V. Sandstrom Daniel J. Crothers Mary Muehlen Maring Carol Ronning Kapsner