Case Title: Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. Marosan

Citation: 2006-Ohio-1505

Docket Number: 

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2006-03-07T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. Marosan, 108 Ohio St.3d 1220, 2006-Ohio-1505.] 
 
 
STARK COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION ET AL. v. MAROSAN. 
[Cite as Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. Marosan,  
108 Ohio St.3d 1220, 2006-Ohio-1505.] 
(No. 2005-0818 — Submitted February 22, 2006 — Decided March 7, 2006.) 
ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. 
__________________ 
{¶ 1} On October 26, 2005, this court issued an order suspending 
respondent, Joseph E. Marosan, from the practice of law for a period of two years 
with the last eighteen months of the suspension stayed and ordering respondent to 
be placed on probation for the stayed portion of the suspension, with conditions.  
It was further ordered that if respondent violated any of the conditions, the stay 
would be lifted, and respondent would serve the entire two-year suspension.  
Respondent was ordered to pay board costs in the amount of $6,615.15.  These 
costs and all accrued interest remain unpaid. 
{¶ 2} On January 10, 2006, respondent was ordered to show cause why 
he should not be found in contempt for failure to comply with the court’s order of 
suspension.  On January 30, 2006, respondent filed a response to the show cause 
order with an affidavit of compliance attached.  Relator Cuyahoga County Bar 
Association filed a reply to respondent’s response.  Upon consideration thereof, 
{¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED that the previously imposed stay is revoked and 
respondent, Joseph E. Marosan, Attorney Registration No. 0025849, last known 
business address in Middleburg Heights, Ohio, shall serve the entire two-year 
suspension imposed in the court’s order of October 26, 2005, as an actual period 
of suspension.  All terms of that order remain in effect. 
{¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that service shall be 
deemed made on respondent by sending this order, and all other orders in this 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 
2 
case, by certified mail to the most recent address respondent has given to the 
Attorney Registration Section. 
{¶ 5} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue 
certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that 
publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that 
respondent bear the costs of publication. 
{¶ 6} For earlier case, see Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. Marosan, 106 Ohio 
St.3d 430, 2005-Ohio-5412, 835 N.E.2d 718. 
 
MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, 
O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. 
__________________