Case Title: Reed v. Miamisburg

Citation: 1994-Ohio-166

Docket Number: 19931910

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 1994-12-30T00:00:00Z

Document:
OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO                               
                                                                                 
              **** SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITING ****                               
                                                                                 
     The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of                      
Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27,                      
1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice                   
Thomas J. Moyer.                                                                 
     Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's                   
Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio.  Attention:  Walter S.                      
Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative                         
Assistant.  Tel.:  (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010.                       
Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome.                            
     NOTE:  Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the                  
full texts of the opinions after they have been released                         
electronically to the public.  The reader is therefore advised                   
to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West                       
Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions.                     
The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume                    
and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound                   
volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.                                            
                                                                                 
Reed et al., Appellants, v. City of Miamisburg, Appellee.                        
[Cite as Reed v. Miamisburg (1994),     Ohio St.3d    .]                         
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.                                       
     (No. 93-1910 -- Submitted November 29, 1994 -- Decided                      
December 30, 1994.)                                                              
     Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County,                     
No. 13446.                                                                       
                                                                                 
     Susco, Hecht & Derose Co., L.P.A., and David P. Hecht, for                  
appellants.                                                                      
     Jenks, Surdky & Cowdrey Co., L.P.A., Robert F. Cowdrey and                  
Arden Lynn Achenberg, for appellee.                                              
                                                                                 
     The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been                          
improvidently allowed.                                                           
     Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and                     
F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.                                                       
     Pfeifer, J., dissents.                                                      
     Pfeifer, J., dissenting.  I would not have dismissed this                   
case as having been improvidently allowed, but would have heard                  
the case on its merits.  I would then have applied to this case                  
my analysis of sovereign immunity as discussed in my                             
concurrence in Garrett v. Sandusky (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 139,                    
141, 624 N.E.2d 704, 706.