Case Title: Dayton Bar Assn. v. Andrews

Citation: 2000-Ohio-363

Docket Number: 

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2000-04-18T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Andrews, 88 Ohio St.3d 1238, 2000-Ohio-363.] 
 
 
 
 
 
DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. ANDREWS. 
[Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Andrews (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 1238.] 
(No. 96-2807 — Submitted and decided April 18, 2000.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
 
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for 
reinstatement on December 30, 1999, by respondent Charles G. Andrews, a.k.a. Charles 
Granall Andrews, and the report by relator, Dayton Bar Association, filed March 17, 
2000. 
 
The court coming now to consider its order of June 25, 1997, wherein pursuant to 
Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), the court suspended respondent for one year, with conditions 
imposed on his reinstatement, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that 
order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). 
 
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED by the court that respondent Charles G. 
Andrews, a.k.a. Charles Granall Andrews, Attorney Registration No. 0037476, last 
known address in Toledo, Ohio, be reinstated to the practice of law and that he be placed 
on probation for one year in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(9).  It is further ordered, sua 
sponte, that the Toledo Bar Association monitor respondent in accordance with Gov.Bar 
R. V(9).  It is further ordered, sua sponte, that on or before thirty days from the date of 
 
 
2
this order, the Toledo Bar Association file with the Clerk of this court the name of the 
attorney who will serve as respondent’s monitor in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(9). 
 
It is further ordered that at the end of respondent’s probationary period, the 
Toledo Bar Association file with the Clerk of this court a report indicating whether 
respondent, during his probationary period, complied with the terms of the probation. 
 
It is further ordered that at the end of the probationary period, respondent may 
apply for termination of probation as provided in Gov.Bar R. V(9).  It is further ordered 
that respondent’s probation shall not be terminated and respondent shall not be reinstated 
to the practice of law until (1) respondent files an application for termination of probation 
in compliance with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D); (2) respondent complies with this and all other 
orders issued by this court; (3) respondent complies with the Rules for the Government of 
the Bar of Ohio; (4) the Toledo Bar Association files with the Clerk of this court a report 
indicating that respondent complied with the terms of the probation; and (5) this court 
orders that the probation be terminated and respondent reinstated to the practice of law. 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of 
this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided 
for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. 
 
For earlier case, see Dayton Bar Assn. v. Andrews (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 109, 679 
N.E.2d 1093. 
 
 
3
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG 
STRATTON, JJ., concur.