Case Title: Wood v. Nunnery

Citation: 

Docket Number: 100PA14

State: north-carolina

Court: North Carolina Supreme Court

Date: 2015-04-10T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 
No. 100PA14  
FILED 10 April 2015 
TERRY WAYNE WOOD 
 
 
v. 
JEREMY 
NUNNERY, 
NORTH 
CAROLINA FARM 
BUREAU 
MUTUAL 
INSURANCE COMPANY, and FIREMEN’S INSURANCE COMPANY OF 
WASHINGTON, D.C.  
 
On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous, 
unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 757 S.E.2d 526 
(2014), affirming an order entered on 11 February 2013 by Judge Edwin G. Wilson, 
Jr. in Superior Court, Forsyth County.  On 11 June 2014, the Supreme Court allowed 
plaintiff’s conditional petition for discretionary review as to additional issues.  Heard 
in the Supreme Court on 12 January 2015.  
Maynard & Harris, Attorneys at Law, PLLC, by C. Douglas Maynard, Jr., for 
plaintiff-appellant/appellee. 
 
Van Laningham Duncan PLLC, by L. Cooper Harrell; Smith Moore 
Leatherwood LLP, by James G. Exum, Jr.; and Bennett & Guthrie, PLLC, by 
Rodney 
A. 
Guthrie 
and 
Roberta 
King 
Latham, 
for 
defendant-
appellant/appellee Jeremy Nunnery. 
 
Brown Moore & Associates, PLLC, by Jon R. Moore; and White & Stradley, 
PLLC, by J. David Stradley, for North Carolina Advocates for Justice, amicus 
curiae. 
 
Pinto Coates Kyre & Bowers, PLLC, by Deborah J. Bowers, for North Carolina 
Association of Defense Attorneys, amicus curiae. 
 
 
PER CURIAM. 
 
WOOD V. NUNNERY 
 
Opinion of the Court 
 
 
-2- 
 
DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.