Case Title: Interest of D.V.A.

Citation: 2019 ND 253

Docket Number: 20190118

State: north-dakota

Court: North Dakota Supreme Court

Date: 2019-10-29T00:00:00Z

Document:
2019 ND ____ In the Interest of D.V.A. ---------- Julie Lawyer, State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee v. D.V.A., Respondent and Appellant No. 20190118 Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable James S. Hill, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Marina Spahr (on brief), Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for petitioner and appellee. Kent M. Morrow (on brief), Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellant. 1 Per Curiam. D.V.A. appealed from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. D.V.A. argues there was not clear and convincing evidence that he continues to be a sexually dangerous individual under N.D.C.C. § 25-03.3-01(8) or that he has “serious difficulty controlling behavior.” See Kansas v. Crane, 534 U.S. 407, 412-13 (2002). We conclude the district court’s findings of fact and order are supported by clear and convincing evidence, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). Interest of D.V.A. No. 20190118 Per Curiam. [¶1] D.V.A. appealed from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. D.V.A. argues there was not clear and convincing evidence that he continues to be a sexually dangerous individual under N.D.C.C. § 25-03.3-01(8) or that he has “serious difficulty controlling behavior.” See Kansas v. Crane, 534 U.S. 407, 412-13 (2002). We conclude the district court’s findings of fact and order are supported by clear and convincing evidence, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jon J. Jensen Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers