Case Title: Steven Van Erden v. Joseph A. Sobczak

Citation: 2003 WI 129

Docket Number: 2002AP001595

State: wisconsin

Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court

Date: 2003-09-15T00:00:00Z

Document:
2003 WI 129 
 
 
 
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 
 
 
 
 
 
CASE NO.: 
02-1595 
 
 
 
COMPLETE TITLE: 
 
 
Steven Van Erden and Cherie Van Erden,  
          Plaintiffs-Appellants, 
     v. 
Joseph A. Sobczak,  
          Defendant, 
American Family Mutual Insurance Company  
and City of Milwaukee,  
          Defendants-Respondents, 
Badger Mutual Insurance,  
          Intervenor. 
 
 
 
 
ON REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS 
Reported at 260 Wis. 2d 81, 659 N.W.2d 896 
(Ct. App. 2003-Published) 
 
 
ORDER FILED: 
September 12, 2003   
SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS: 
        
ORAL ARGUMENT: 
        
 
 
SOURCE OF APPEAL: 
 
 
COURT: 
Circuit   
 
COUNTY: 
Milwaukee   
 
JUDGE: 
David A. Hansher   
 
 
 
JUSTICES: 
 
 
CONCURRED: 
        
 
DISSENTED: 
        
 
NOT PARTICIPATING:         
 
 
 
ATTORNEYS: 
 
      
 
 
2003 WI 129 
 
 
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NOTICE 
This order is subject to further 
editing and modification.  The 
final version will appear in the 
bound volume of the official 
reports.   
 
 
 
No.  02-1595  
 
 
Steven Van Erden and Cherie Van Erden,  
          Plaintiffs-Appellants, 
 
     v. 
 
Joseph A. Sobczak,  
          Defendant, 
American Family Mutual Insurance Company  
and City of Milwaukee,  
          Defendants-Respondents, 
Badger Mutual Insurance,  
          Intervenor. 
 
FILED 
 
SEP 12, 2003 
 
Cornelia G. Clark 
Clerk of Supreme Court 
Madison, WI 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Court entered the following order on this date: 
 
A petition for review pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 808.10 
having 
been 
filed 
on 
behalf 
of 
plaintiffs-appellants-
petitioners, Steven and Cherie Van Erden, and considered by this 
court; 
 
IT IS ORDERED that the petition for review is granted, the 
court of appeals’ decision in this case is summarily vacated and 
the matter is remanded to the court of appeals for further 
consideration in light of this court’s decision in Folkman v. 
Quamme, 2003 WI 116 (opinion issued July 16, 2003). 
 
 
No.   
 
2