Case Title: Deanna Doyle-Vallery, M.D., Et Al. v. Julie B. Aranibar, Et Vir.

Citation: 

Docket Number: SC03-359

State: florida

Court: Florida Supreme Court

Date: 2005-01-20T00:00:00Z

Document:
Supreme Court of Florida 
 
 
_____________ 
 
No. SC03-359 
_____________ 
 
 
DEANNA DOYLE-VALLERY, M.D., et al., 
Petitioners, 
 
vs. 
 
JULIE B. ARANIBAR, et vir, 
Respondents. 
 
[January 20, 2005] 
 
PER CURIAM. 
 
We have for review the decision in Doyle-Vallery v. Aranibar, 838 So. 2d 
1198 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), which certified conflict with the decision in Allstate 
Insurance Co. v. Sarkis, 809 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), which this Court 
subsequently approved in Sarkis v. Allstate Insurance Co., 863 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 
2003).  We have jurisdiction.  See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.  We accept 
jurisdiction in this case, summarily quash the decision of the Second District Court 
of Appeal, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Sarkis. 
 
It is so ordered. 
 
- 2 -
PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and 
BELL, JJ., concur. 
 
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND 
IF FILED, DETERMINED. 
 
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Certified 
Direct Conflict of Decisions 
 
 
Second District - Case No. 2D02-2311 
 
 
(Manatee County) 
 
Richard R. Garland of Dickinson and Gibbons, P.A., Sarasota, Florida, 
 
 
for Petitioner 
 
Theodore C. Eastmoore of Matthews, Eastmoore, Hardy, Crauwels and Garcia, 
P.A., Sarasota, Florida, 
 
 
for Respondent