Case Title: State v. Maldonado

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: hawaii

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court

Date: 2005-07-12T00:00:00Z

Document:
LAW LIBRAR

No. 25606

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

STATE OF HAWAI'I, Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

aad

  

JOBERT LYLE MALDONADO, Defendant-Appel lant,

 

APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT
(CR. NO. 02-1-1297)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
(By: Moon, C.J., for the court’)

Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration of
the November 30, 2005 order approving in part attorney's fee
request and compensation for necessary expenses, it appears that
the time for filing a response to the application for a writ of
certiorari was not increased by two days pursuant to HRAP 26(c)
inasmuch as HRAP 26(c) applies only when the time for acting is
measured from service of a paper (i.e. HRAP 27(a), 28(c), 28(d)}
and the time for filing a response to an application for a writ
of certiorari is measured from the filing of the application, not
the service of the application. See HRAP 40.1(e). Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for
reconsideration is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, December 14, 2005.

 

FOR THE COURT:

a Justice

 

‘considered by: Moon, C.J.
putty, 99.

Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and