Case Title: STATE v MERSEAL

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: montana

Court: Montana Supreme Court

Date: 1975-08-08T00:00:00Z

Document:
No. 12706 I N THE S U P R E M E C O U R T O F THE STATE O F M O N T A N A 1974 STATE O F M O N T A N A , P l a i n t i f f and Respondent, -vs - BILL R O S C O E MERSEAL, Defendant and Appellant. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING: Counsel of Record: For Appellant : Daniel J.Shea argued, Missoula, Montana For Respondent: Hon. Robert L. Woodahl, Attorney General, Helena, Montana Robert L. Deschanps II1,County Attorney, appeared Missoula, Montana Harold V. Dye. Deputy County Attorney, argued, Missoula , Montana For Amicus Curiae: Charles Angel argued, Bozeman, Montana Submitted: June 25, 1974 Decided : JUL 2 3 ~ i l c d : JUL 8 8 Mr. Chief Justice James T. Harrison delivered the Opinion of the Court. Application by appellant Bill Roscoe Merseal for an order compelling Carroll B. Copeland, official court reporter for the fourth judicial district, to supply him with one original copy of the transcript of the proceedings in the district court and charge him no more than 7-1/2$ per folio (100 words). Appel- lant intends to reproduce the transcript on his own, for an appeal from a conviction for second degree assault. Appellant is not an indigent. The issue raised is: May a nonindigent appellant in a criminal case compel a court reporter to furnish only the orig- inal transcript of the trial court proceedings, and furnish other copies of the transcript himself? In support of his position appellant simply asserts there are no explicit rules concerning the number of copies of the tran- script which must be filed on appeal. Rule IV of the Rules of the Montana Supreme Court, 1966, states: "1. In all criminal appeals the Montana Rules of Appellate Civil Procedure may be followed in the preparation of the record on appeal insofar as they are applicable and not in conflict with a specific statu- tory provision of the Criminal Code. * * *" Rule 10 of the M.R.App.Civ.P. states: "(a) * * * Six copies of each transcript must be lodged with the clerk of this Court for filing. * * *". This Court is clearly entitled to six copies of the trial transcript. The only statute in Montana's Code of Criminal Procedure at variance with the above-quoted rules is section 95-2428, R . C . M . 1947, which comems itself with indigent appeals and is not applicable here. We see no merit in appellant's suggestion that he ought to be permitted t o copy t h e o r i g i n a l t r a n s c r i p t by h i s own methods. Assurances by appellant t h a t modern technology would provide us with p e r f e c t l y acceptable copies of t h e t r a n s c r i p t , and a t t h e same t i m e save appellant money, m i s s t h e point. Our concern here is t o preserve t h e i n t e g r i t y of t h e record. For obvious reasons, t h e record on appeal must be i n v i o l a t e . The court r e p o r t e r consequently i s required t o c e r t i f y t o t h e correctness of t h e t r a n s c r i p t . Section 95-2408 (b) , R.C.M. 1947; Rule 9 (b) , M.R.App.Civ.P. Common sense i n d i c a t e s t h e most p r a c t i c a b l e way of ensuring a c o r r e c t t r a n s c r i p t is f o r t h e court r e p o r t e r t o keep t h e o r i g i n a l copy i n h i s possession a t a l l t i m e s and from it manufacture more copies a s they a r e needed. Otherwise t h e r e p o r t e r w i l l be obliged t o choose between exposing himself t o l i a b i l i t y o r c e r t i f y i n g each copy made o u t s i d e h i s o f f i c e and r e c e r t i f y i n g t h e o r i g i n a l . I n a day of increasingly voluminous t r a n s c r i p t s , t h i s Court i s not about t o c a s t such a tedious burden upon c o u r t r e p o r t e r s . I n view of t h e foregoing, it is incumbent t h a t t h e copies of t h e t r a n s c r i p t needed by t h e p a r t i e s f o r use on appeal a l s o be procured from t h e r e p o r t e r . The r e l i e f sought hy appellant i s denied. f'- L. - - -- -" L L-*- - , - , , , , L , - , , , , , , - , - L-----& ------- . Chief ~ u s t i c e W e concur: , / ' : 7 /' ~ h ~ , k , - - . , ! . c&;z< . L ---- -'*--- -----------------"-' w. P e t e r G. &+./district judge, s i t t i n g i n place M r . J u s t i c e Daly. J u s t i c e Frank I. H a s w e l l d i d not p a r t i c i p a t e i n t h i s cause. - 3 -