Case Title: Kelly v. 1250 Oceanside Partners

Citation: 111 Haw. 205

Docket Number: 

State: hawaii

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court

Date: 2006-03-07T00:00:00Z

Document:
no. 26813

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAT'T

eee

WALTER JOHN KELLY, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appel lant s/Cross-Appellees

1250 OCEANSIDE PARTNERS, a Hawai'i Limited Partnership,
Defendant-Appellant /Cross-Appel lant /Cross-Appellee

and
STATE OF HAWAI'I, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
a Department of the State of Hawai'i, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants
and

DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES,
et al., Defendants-Appellees

and
LAND USE COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee

and

COUNTY OF HAWAT'T, et al.,
Defendants-Appel lants/Cross-Appellees.

and

‘OGNYRY HE

aay 0 31015

sun YA a wo

BO Hd L~ UNH 9002

JOHN DOES 1-10, et al., Defendants

APPEAL FROM THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT
(CIV, NO. 00-1-0192K)

ORDER
(By: Acoba, J., for the court!)

upon consideration of Defendant-Appellant /Cross-

Appellee 1250 Oceanside Partners’ motion for remand and stay of

 

considered by Moon, C.J. Levinson, Acoba, and Dafty, 3¥.

 

qa
proceedings, the papers in support, and the records and files
herein, it appears that: (1) the parties reached a tentative
settlement resolving issues in this appeal except for issues
concerning the existence or extent of any public trust
obligations relating to coastal water quality, whether such
Guties as may exist in these areas were violated in this case,
and related matters; (2) the parties submitted a joint HRCP Rule
60(b) motion to the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit to
partially vacate the third amended judgment; and (3) on March 3,
2006, the circuit court issued an order indicating its
inclination to grant the HRCP Rule 60(b) motion upon remand of
the case from the supreme court in accordance with Life of the
Land v. Arivoshi, 57 Haw. 249, 553 P.24 464 (1976). Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The motion for remand is granted, and this matter
is remanded to the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit for
consideration of the joint HRCP Rule 60(b) motion.

2, Within thirty days from the date of this order, the
parties shall file the joint HRCP Rule 60(b) motion, and the
circuit court shall hear and decide the joint HRCP Rule 60(b)
motion.

3. Within thirty days thereafter, the circuit court
shall issue its order on the HRCP Rule 60(b) motion and/or
amended judgment.

4, Within ten days after the circuit court issues its
order and/or amended judgment, the clerk of the Circuit Court of
the Third Circuit shall supplement the record on appeal with all

documents filed in the record on remand.
5. Within ten days after the circuit court issues its
order and/or amended judgment, the parties shall inform the court
of the status of the appeal and which issues, if any, renain
pending for decision.

6. The appeal is stayed pending the notification
required in this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, March “7, 2006. _

FOR THE COURT: JPR

7rasociate Justice \\

   

Lawrence S. Okinaga and
David W.K. Wong (Carlsmith
Ball LLP), on the motion

for defendant~appellant/

cross-appel lant /cross-appellee
1250 Oceanside Partners.