Case Title: Lawrence J. Harrington, III, v. Com, Dept. of Trans., Bureau of Driver Licensing, Aplt. (Concurring Opinion)

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: pennsylvania

Court: Pennsylvania Supreme Court

Date: 2000-12-26T00:00:00Z

Document:
[J-207-2000] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT LAWRENCE J. HARRINGTON, Appellee v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING, Appellant : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 209 M.D. Appeal Docket 1999 Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County, Civil Division at Docket No. 99-02476, filed May 6, 1999 SUBMITTED: December 3, 1999 CONCURRING OPINION MR. JUSTICE CAPPY DECIDED: December 22, 2000 I join the instant opinion, notwithstanding my concurring and dissenting opinion in Commonwealth, Dep’t of Transp. v. McCafferty, 758 A.2d 1155 (Pa. 2000), in which the majority of this court determined that certain reporting requirements of Article III of the Driver’s License Compact, 75 Pa.C.S. §1581, need not be strictly complied with in order to meet the requisites of due process. I recognize that McCafferty, although ill-advised, is stare decisis and compels my joinder herein.