Case Title: Rosalyn Ann Sanders v. State

Citation: 

Docket Number: SC00-1688

State: florida

Court: Florida Supreme Court

Date: 2001-09-26T00:00:00Z

Document:
Supreme 
Court 
of 
Florida
 
____________
No. SC00-1688
____________
ROSALYN ANN SANDERS,
Petitioner,
vs.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
[September 26, 2001]
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review of Sanders v. State, 765 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 1st
DCA 2000), based on certified conflict with T.E.J. v. State, 749 So. 2d 557 (Fla.
2d DCA 2000); Stanton v. State, 746 So. 2d 1229 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); and Brown
v. State, 652 So. 2d 877 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).  Upon further consideration,
however, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted in this case. 
Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this cause.
It is so ordered.
-2-
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ.,
concur.
ANSTEAD, J., dissents.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - 
Certified Direct Conflict
First District - Case No. 1D99-2302 
(Escambia County)
Steven A. Been, Assistant Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee,
Florida,
for Petitioner
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, James W. Rogers, Tallahassee Bureau
Chief, Criminal Appeals, and Karen M. Holland, Assistant Attorney General,
Tallahassee, Florida,
for Respondent
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Richard J. Sanders, Assistant
Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, Florida,
for Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amicus Curiae