Case Title: Claudio v. State

Citation: 

Docket Number: 125, 2014

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2014-06-09T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
CARMELO J. CLAUDIO, 
 
Defendant Below- 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
STATE OF DELAWARE, 
 
Plaintiff Below- 
Appellee. 
§ 
§  No. 125, 2014 
§ 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below—Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware, 
§  in and for New Castle County 
§  Cr. ID 87001256DI 
§ 
§ 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted: May 15, 2014 
 
 
 
 
  Decided: June 9, 2014 
 
Before STRINE, Chief Justice, BERGER, and RIDGELY, Justices 
 
O R D E R 
 
 
This 9th day of June 2014, after careful consideration of appellant’s opening brief 
and the State’s motion to affirm, we find it manifest that the judgment below should be 
affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court=s order dated February 18, 2014, which 
adopted the Commissioner’s report dated January 30, 2014. The Superior Court did not 
err in concluding that appellant’s sixth motion for postconviction relief was barred by 
Superior Court Criminal Rule 61 and that appellant had failed to overcome the 
procedural hurdles. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court 
is AFFIRMED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Henry duPont Ridgely 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice