Case Title: Daniek L. Spuck, Aplt v. Pa. Board of Probation and Parole (Per Curiam Order)

Citation: 

Docket Number: 25 WAP 2009

State: pennsylvania

Court: Pennsylvania Supreme Court

Date: 2010-03-26T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT DANIEL L. SPUCK, Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, ET AL., Appellees : : : : : : : : : : No. 25 WAP 2009 Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court entered August 31, 2009 at No. 246 M.D. 2009. ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 26th day of March, 2010, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby AFFIRMED.1 1 Additionally, we hereby deny Appellant’s “Motion for Permission to Attach Exhibits” filed on December 13, 2009. Certain of the exhibits Appellant seeks to attach to his brief are dehors the record and cannot be considered. See Commonwealth v. Bracalielly, 658 A.2d 755, 763 (Pa. 1995) (law of Pennsylvania is well settled that matters which are not of record cannot be considered on appeal).