Case Title: Peca v. Riedl

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: hawaii

Court: Hawaii Supreme Court

Date: 2003-09-25T00:00:00Z

Document:
NOS. 25627 and 25840 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I ALBA PECA, Plaintiff-Appellant vs. BRIGITTE R. RIEDL, Defendant-Appellee and JOHN DOES 1-50; JANE DOES 1-50; DOE PARTNERSHIPS; DOE CORPORATIONS, DOE ENTITIES and DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-50, Defendants APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT (CIV. NO. 00-1-1247) ORDER (By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.) Upon consideration of appellant’s letter to this court of September 12, 2003, which shall be treated as a motion for clarification of the August 29, 2003 order dismissing this appeal, the papers in support and the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for clarification is denied without prejudice to appellant seeking relief in the circuit court. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 25, 2003. Alba Peca, pro se on the motion