Case Title: Vincent Parrish v. State of Florida

Citation: 

Docket Number: SC00-878

State: florida

Court: Florida Supreme Court

Date: 2001-06-07T00:00:00Z

Document:
Supreme Court of Florida
 
____________
No. SC00-878 
____________
VINCENT PARRISH,
Petitioner,
vs.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
[June 7, 2001]
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Parrish v. State, 760 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), 
wherein the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the Second
District’s decision in Thompson v. State, 708 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998),
approved, 750 So. 2d 643 (Fla. 1999), on the issue of standing to challenge chapter
95-182, Laws of Florida, as violative of the single subject rule contained in article
III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution.  We have jurisdiction.  See Art. V, §
3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
-2-
Based on our decision in Salters v. State, 758 So. 2d 667 (Fla. 2000), and
the State’s confession of error, we quash the decision below to the extent that it is
inconsistent with Salters, and remand to the district court for reconsideration in
light of our opinions in Salters and State v. Thompson, 750 So. 2d 643 (Fla. 1999). 
It is so ordered. 
SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
WELLS, C.J., dissents.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION, AND
IF FILED, DETERMINED.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - 
Certified Direct Conflict
Fourth District - Case No. 4D97-4409 
(Broward County)
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Joseph R. Chloupek, Assistant Public
Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, Florida,
for Petitioner
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Celia Terenzio, Bureau Chief, and
Joseph A. Tringali, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, Florida,
for Respondent