Case Title: Columbus Bar Assn. v. Dye

Citation: 2000-Ohio-87

Docket Number: 19971904

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2000-10-27T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Dye, 90 Ohio St.3d 1229, 2000-Ohio-87.] 
 
1 
 
 
COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. DYE. 
[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Dye (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 1229.] 
(No. 97-1904 — Submitted and decided October 27, 2000.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
 
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 
application for reinstatement by respondent Lewis William Dye, Attorney 
Registration No. 0013021, last known address in Columbus, Ohio. 
 
The court coming now to consider its order of June 3, 1998, wherein the 
court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of 
two years, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and 
with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).  Therefore, 
 
IT IS ORDERED by this court that Lewis William Dye be and hereby is 
reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified 
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be 
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), and that respondent bear the 
costs of publication. 
 
For earlier case, see Columbus Bar Assn. v. Dye (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 64, 
694 N.E.2d 440. 
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and 
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.