Case Title: BOOST v. City of Myrtle Beach

Citation: 

Docket Number: 2010-MO-015

State: south-carolina

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Date: 2010-06-08T00:00:00Z

Document:
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court BOOST a/k/a Business Owners Organized to Save Tourism and Bart Viers, Petitioners, v. City of Myrtle Beach, Respondent. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Memorandum Opinion No. 2010-MO-015 Heard February 3, 2010 - Filed June 8, 2010 JUDGMENT FOR PETITIONER VIERS J. Todd Kincannon, of Kincannon & Associates, of Columbia and Thaddaeus Viers, of Coastal Law, of Myrtle Beach, for Petitioners. Michael W. Battle, of Battle, Vaught & Howe, of Conway, for Respondent. JUSTICE PLEICONES: We grant judgment for Petitioner Bart Viers[1] pursuant to Rule 220, SCACR and the opinion in George Jensen Aakjer v. City of Myrtle Beach, Op. No. 26825 (S.C. Sup. Ct. filed June 8, 2010 ). JUDGMENT FOR PETITIONER. TOAL, C.J., BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur. [1] Petitioners did not contest Respondent's assertion that BOOST does not have standing in this action.