Case Title: Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Haas

Citation: 1999-Ohio-40

Docket Number: 

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 1999-10-29T00:00:00Z

Document:
CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. HAAS. 
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Haas (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 1225.] 
(No. 97-2640 — Submitted and decided October 29, 1999.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
 
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for 
reinstatement by respondent Herbert Jaime Haas, Attorney Registration No. 0015411, last 
known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio. 
 
The court coming now to consider its order of September 30, 1998, wherein the 
court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year, 
finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions 
of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).  Therefore, 
 
IT IS ORDERED by this court that Herbert Jaime Haas be and hereby is reinstated 
to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of 
this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided 
for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. 
 
For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Haas (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 302, 699 
N.E.2d 919. 
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG 
STRATTON, JJ., concur.