Case Title: Foreman v. State

Citation: 

Docket Number: 599, 2018

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2019-04-30T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
DAVID FOREMAN, 
 
Defendant Below, 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
STATE OF DELAWARE, 
 
Plaintiff Below, 
Appellee. 
§ 
§   
§  No. 599, 2018 
§ 
§  Court Below—Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware 
§   
§ Cr. ID No. 1007011701(S) 
§  
§ 
§ 
 
Submitted: March 5, 2019 
Decided: 
April 30, 2019 
 
Before VAUGHN, SEITZ, and TRAYNOR, Justices. 
 
 
ORDER 
 
After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion 
to affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment below should be 
affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court’s order, 
dated November 15, 2018, denying the appellant’s third motion for postconviction 
relief as procedurally barred under Superior Court Rule 61(i)(1), (i)(2), and (i)(3).  
The appellant has not pleaded any circumstances under Rule 61(d)(2)(i) or (d)(2)(ii) 
that overcome the procedural bars set forth in Rule 61. 
 
 
 
 
2 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is 
GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.   
 
BY THE COURT: 
 
/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Justice