Case Title: Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Kathman

Citation: 2002-Ohio-1050

Docket Number: 

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2002-02-19T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Kathman, 94 Ohio St.3d 1240, 2002-Ohio-1050.] 
1 
 
 
CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. KATHMAN. 
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Kathman (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 1240.] 
(No. 00-1865 – Submitted and decided February 19, 2002.) 
ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 
__________________ 
 
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 
application for reinstatement by respondent, Edward T. Kathman, Attorney 
Registration No. 0055446, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio. 
 
The court coming now to consider its order of June 13, 2001, wherein the 
court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of 
six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and 
with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).  Therefore, 
 
IT IS ORDERED by this court that Edward T. Kathman be and hereby is 
reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified 
copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be 
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the 
costs of publication. 
 
For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Kathman (2001), 92 Ohio 
St.3d 92, 748 N.E.2d 1091. 
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and 
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. 
__________________