Case Title: Akzo Salt, Inc. v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Serv.

Citation: 1996-Ohio-434

Docket Number: 19951253

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 1996-07-03T00:00:00Z

Document:
AKZO SALT, INC., APPELLANT, V. ADMR., OHIO BUREAU OF EMPLOYMENT 
1 
SERVICES, APPELLEE. 
2 
[Cite as Akzo Salt, Inc. v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Serv. (1996), ___ Ohio St.3d 
3 
___.] 
4 
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. 
5 
 
(No. 95-1253 -- Submitted May 22, 1996 -- Decided July 3, 1996.) 
6 
 
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 67221. 
7 
_________ 
8 
 
Willacy & LoPresti, Timothy A. Marcovy, Aubrey B. Willacy and M. 
9 
Scott Young, for appellant. 
10 
 
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, Betsey Nims Friedman and 
11 
Frank J. Reed, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee. 
12 
_________ 
13 
 
The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently 
14 
allowed. 
15 
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and 
16 
STRATTON, JJ., concur. 
17 
 
2
 
COOK, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of 
1 
appeals. 
2 
 
3