Case Title: Bartley v. State

Citation: 

Docket Number: 575, 2009

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2010-09-23T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
MICHAEL BARTLEY, 
 
Defendant Below, 
Appellant, 
 
v. 
 
STATE OF DELAWARE, 
 
Plaintiff Below, 
Appellee. 
§ 
§  No. 575, 2009 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below—Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware, 
§  in and for Sussex County 
§  Cr. ID 0005016436 
§   
§ 
§ 
 
Submitted:  September 20, 2010 
Decided:  September 23, 2010 
 
O R D E R 
 
This  23rd day of September 2010, it appears to the Court that, on August 31, 
2010, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be 
dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for appellant's failure to diligently 
prosecute his appeal by not filing his supplemental opening memorandum in this 
matter.  The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the 
required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be 
unopposed. 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme 
Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED. 
BY THE COURT: 
 
/s/Henry duPont Ridgely 
Justice