Case Title: Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Teitelbaum

Citation: 

Docket Number: 43ag/23

State: maryland

Court: Maryland Supreme Court

Date: 2024-05-31T00:00:00Z

Document:
O R D E R 
 
Following the filing of the petition for disciplinary or remedial action, in which 
Bar Counsel charged that respondent had been disciplined by the District of Columbia 
Court of Appeals for violation of Rule 1.15(a) of the District of Columbia Rules of 
Professional Conduct, the Court required the parties to show cause why reciprocal 
discipline should not be imposed. Respondent did not respond to the order to show cause. 
Bar Counsel did respond and recommended corresponding discipline.  
It is, therefore, this 31st day of May 2024, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,  
ORDERED that George Alan Teitelbaum is suspended from the practice of 
law in Maryland for 30 days; and it is further  
ORDERED that the suspension is stayed in favor of one year of unsupervised 
probation under the same conditions imposed by the District of Columbia Court of 
Appeals. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
        /s/ Matthew J. Fader 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
Chief Justice 
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE 
COMMISSION OF MARYLAND 
 
 
 
 
v. 
 
GEORGE ALAN TEITELBAUM 
 
* 
 
* 
 
* 
 
* 
 
* 
 
     
     IN THE 
 
     SUPREME COURT 
 
     OF MARYLAND 
 
     AG No. 43 
     September Term, 2023 
   
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal 
Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State 
Government Article) this document is authentic. 
 
Gregory Hilton, Clerk 
2024.05.31 
08:47:03 -04'00'