Case Title: Pennington & Todd v. Scioli

Citation: 

Docket Number: 376, 2011

State: delaware

Court: Delaware Supreme Court

Date: 2011-08-12T00:00:00Z

Document:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 
RACHEL PENNINGTON and KENDRA 
TODD, 
 
Plaintiffs Below- 
Appellants, 
 
v. 
 
DOMINICK SCIOLI, 
 
Defendant Below- 
Appellee. 
§ 
§ 
§  No. 376, 2011 
§ 
§ 
§  Court Below—Superior Court 
§  of the State of Delaware, 
§  in and for Kent County 
§  C.A. No. 07C-11-021 
§ 
§ 
§ 
 
Submitted: July 27, 2011 
  Decided: August 12, 2011 
 
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, JACOBS, and RIDGELY, Justices. 
 
 
O R D E R 
 
This 12th day of August 2011, it appears to the Court that: 
(1) 
The plaintiffs-appellants have petitioned this Court, pursuant to 
Supreme Court Rule 42, to accept an appeal from interlocutory orders of the 
Superior Court dated February 16, 2011 and June 29, 2011.  The February order 
granted the defendant’s motion for a new trial.  The June order denied the 
plaintiffs’ motion for reargument of the February order. 
(2) 
The plaintiffs filed their application for certification to take an 
interlocutory appeal in the Superior Court on July 8, 2011.  The Superior Court 
denied the certification application on July 25, 2011. 
 
 
-2-
(3) 
Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound 
discretion of this Court.  In the exercise of its discretion, this Court has concluded 
that the application for interlocutory review does not meet the requirements of 
Supreme Court Rule 42(b) and should be refused. 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the within 
interlocutory appeal is REFUSED. 
BY THE COURT: 
/s/ Henry duPont Ridgely 
Justice