Case Title: Disciplinary Counsel v. Liviola

Citation: 2002-Ohio-1049

Docket Number: 20011255

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 2002-02-27T00:00:00Z

Document:
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Liviola, 94 Ohio St.3d 408, 2002-Ohio-1049.] 
 
 
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. LIVIOLA. 
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Liviola (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 408.] 
Attorneys at law — Misconduct — Permanent disbarment — Lying to friend and 
taking advantage of friend’s mental disability by taking $34,000 for legal 
services not performed — Conviction for wilful failure to provide 
information to the Internal Revenue Service. 
(No. 01-1255 — Submitted November 13, 2001 — Decided February 27, 2002.) 
ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and 
Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 99-69. 
__________________ 
 
Per Curiam.  In December 1996, respondent, Peter S. Liviola of 
Ashtabula, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0060112, met with Daniel Krapf, a 
college friend from New York who suffered from schizophrenia.  Krapf believed 
that he had various legal problems, and respondent told Krapf that although he 
could not handle the problems himself because he was not admitted to practice in 
New York, he had an attorney friend in New York City named Vincent who 
would proceed with Krapf’s legal matters. There was no attorney named Vincent. 
 
From December 1996 through June 1998, Krapf paid respondent $34,000, 
which respondent was to forward to the fictional Vincent to provide Krapf with 
legal services.  This money was not used for any legal concerns of Krapf.  In June 
1998, two days after being confronted by federal law enforcement officers, 
respondent returned the $34,000 to Krapf. 
 
Respondent did not report $14,205 of the money received from Krapf in 
his 1997 federal income tax return.  Hence, in April 1999, respondent pled guilty 
to a violation of Section 7203, Title 26, U.S.Code (willful failure to provide 
information to the Internal Revenue Service), a misdemeanor.  He was sentenced 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 
2 
to four months in prison, two months of community confinement, and one year of 
supervised release.  Respondent then filed an amended 1997 federal tax return. 
 
In December 1999, relator, Office of Disciplinary Counsel, filed a 
complaint charging that respondent’s conduct violated several provisions of the 
Code of Professional Responsibility.  Respondent answered, and the matter was 
referred to a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline 
(“board”).  After a hearing, the panel found the facts as stated and concluded that 
by lying to his college friend and taking advantage of his mental disability, 
respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3) (a lawyer shall not engage in illegal conduct 
involving moral turpitude).  In addition, the panel concurred with respondent’s 
stipulations that his conduct violated DR 1-102(A)(4) (a lawyer shall not engage 
in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation) 1-102(A)(5) 
(a lawyer shall not engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of 
justice), and 1-102(A)(6) (a lawyer shall not engage in conduct that adversely 
reflects on the lawyer’s fitness to practice law).  The panel considered evidence in 
mitigation, including evidence relating to respondent’s gambling addiction.  The 
panel recommended that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice 
of law and not readmitted until he has passed a complete psychological and 
psychiatric examination. 
 
The board adopted the findings and conclusions of the panel but 
recommended that respondent be disbarred from the practice of law. 
 
We have reviewed the record in this case and adopt the findings, 
conclusions, and recommendation of the board.  Respondent is hereby disbarred 
from the practice of law in Ohio.  Costs are taxed to respondent. 
Judgment accordingly. 
 
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and 
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. 
__________________ 
January Term, 2002 
3 
 
Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, for relator. 
 
Mary L. Cibella, for respondent. 
__________________