Case Title: Browning, et al. v. Hale, et al.  (dissenting)

Citation: 

Docket Number: 

State: west-virginia

Court: West Virginia Supreme Court

Date: 2005-12-15T00:00:00Z

Document:
FILED December 15, 2005 released at 3:00 p.m. RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA No. 32672 – Ulrika Browning, et al. v. Judith Halle, et al. Starcher, J., dissenting: I dissent because I believe the trial court had sufficient conflicting evidence on the issues in the instant case to preclude a grant of summary judgment on the issue of nuisance. I note that the appellants are not precluded from filing a new nuisance action in the event that they believe that their upstream neighbors continue to pollute the stream.