Case Title: Youngbird v. Whirlpool Corp.

Citation: 1995-Ohio-83

Docket Number: 19940612

State: ohio

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Date: 1995-06-07T00:00:00Z

Document:
OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO                               
    The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio                  
are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992,                     
pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas                  
J. Moyer.                                                                        
    Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's                    
Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio.  Attention:  Walter S.                      
Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative                         
Assistant.  Tel.:  (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010.                       
Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome.                            
    NOTE:  Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the                   
full texts of the opinions after they have been released                         
electronically to the public.  The reader is therefore advised                   
to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West                       
Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions.                     
The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume                    
and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound                   
volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.                                            
                                                                                 
Youngbird et al., Appellants, v. Whirlpool Corporation,                          
Appellees et al.                                                                 
[Cite as Youngbird v. Whirlpool Corp. (1995),     Ohio                           
St.3d     .]                                                                     
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.                                       
    (No. 94-612 -- Submitted April 19, 1995 -- Decided June 7,                   
1995.)                                                                           
    Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hancock County, No.                     
5-93-17.                                                                         
                                                                                 
    Williams, Jilek, Lafferty & Gallagher Co., L.P.A., and Drew                  
R. Masse, for appellants.                                                        
    Robert M. Anspach Associates, Robert M. Anspach and J. Roy                   
Nunn, for appellee.                                                              
                                                                                 
    The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been                          
improvidently allowed.                                                           
    Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney,                         
Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.